alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 136 (Friday, July 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34745-34746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16974]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER02-862-011]


Entergy Power Ventures, L.P.; Notice of Filing

July 10, 2009.
    Take notice that on July 9, 2009, Entergy Power Ventures, L.P. 
submitted a revised version of its market-based rate tariff reflecting 
the tariff requirements established in Order No. 697-A.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9fd9dacddcd0f1f3f6f1facceaefeff0edebdff9faedfcb1f8f0e9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="33757661707c5d5f5a5d56604643435c414773555641501d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

[[Page 34746]]

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on July 14, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-16974 Filed 7-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (No. 333-143376, No. 333-135403, No. 333-125511,No. 333-117651, No. 333-106503 and No. 333-42996) of OmniVision Technologies,Inc. of our report dated June 27, 2007 relating to the financialstatements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.
| **/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------|------------|
|                               |
| San Jose, California               |
| June 27, 2007                 |

 

----
# cpsaat23
Order entered Febr uary 10 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 01038

- CR

RICHARD RAMON ANGTON , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. F13

- 55911

- H



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATE S the appeal.

On January 21, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the

reporter’s record had not been filed. On February 9, 2015, we received the reporter’s record.

Theref ore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the January 21, 2015 order

requiring findings.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
#### In the Matter of Jayson Marino, Petitioner, v Barbara Kahn et al., Respondents.

[855 NYS2d 560]

It is well settled that “a court order to obtain a blood sample of a suspect may issue provided the People establish (1) probable cause to believe the suspect has committed the crime, (2) a ‘clear indication’ that relevant material evidence will be found, and (3) the method used to secure it is safe and reliable” *(Matter of Abe A.,*56 NY2d 288, 291 [1982]). The People satisfactorily established each of these elements. Upon balancing the seriousness of the crime, the importance of the evidence to the investigation, and the unavailability of less intrusive means of obtaining the evidence, on the one hand, against a concern for the petitioner’s constitutional right to be free from bodily intrusion on the other *(id.),*we conclude that the petitioner failed to demonstrate “a clear legal right to the extraordinary remedy of prohibition” *(Matter of DeFilippo v Rooney,*46 AD3d 681, 682 [2007]). Spolzino, J.P., Miller, Dillon and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The Consolidated Balance sheet as of March 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998 and
the statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and March
31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000884269
<NAME>                        Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                 380
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        3,257
<ALLOWANCES>                                            48
<INVENTORY>                                          3,448
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     7,165
<PP&E>                                               3,639
<DEPRECIATION>                                       1,542
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       9,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                3,257
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               241
<OTHER-SE>                                          24,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         9,842
<SALES>                                              4,489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     4,489
<CGS>                                                2,596
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        1,580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      41
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        272
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    272
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           272
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.01
                                               


</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5394 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the taxation of 

arrow components. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2004 

Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin (for himself and Mr. MATHESON) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the taxation of arrow components. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXCISE TAX ON ARROWS. 

4 (a) REPEAL.—Subsection (b) of section 332 of the 

5 American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, and the amend6 ments made by such subsection, are hereby repealed; and 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied as if 

8 such subsection and amendments had never been enacted. 
2 

•HR 5394 IH 

1 (b) TAX ON ARROW SHAFTS.—Paragraph (2) of sec2 tion 4161(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relat3 ing to arrows) is amended to read as follows: 

4 ‘‘(2) ARROWS.— 

5 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—There is hereby im6 posed on the first sale by the manufacturer, 

7 producer, or importer of any shaft (whether 

8 sold separately or incorporated as part of a fin9 ished or unfinished product) of a type used in 

10 the manufacture of any arrow which after its 

11 assembly— 

12 ‘‘(i) measures 18 inches overall or 

13 more in length, or 

14 ‘‘(ii) measures less than 18 inches 

15 overall in length but is suitable for use 

16 with a bow described in paragraph (1)(A), 

17 a tax equal to 39 cents per shaft. 

18 ‘‘(B) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.— 

19 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any 

20 calendar year beginning after 2005, the 

21 39-cent amount specified in subparagraph 

22 (A) shall be increased by an amount equal 

23 to the product of— 

24 ‘‘(I) such amount, multiplied by 
3 

•HR 5394 IH 

1 ‘‘(II) the cost-of-living adjust2 ment determined under section 1(f)(3) 

3 for such calendar year, determined by 

4 substituting ‘2004’ for ‘1992’ in sub5 paragraph (B) thereof. 

6 ‘‘(ii) ROUNDING.—If any increase de7 termined under clause (i) is not a multiple 

8 of 1 cent, such increase shall be rounded 

9 to the nearest multiple of 1 cent.’’. 

10 (c) ARROW POINTS.—Clause (ii) of section 

11 4161(b)(1)(B) (relating to archery equipment) of such 

12 Code is amended by striking ‘‘quiver or broadhead’’ and 

13 inserting ‘‘quiver, broadhead, or point’’. 

14 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 subsections (b) and (c) shall apply to articles sold by the 

16 manufacturer, producer, or importer after March 31, 

17 2005. 

Æ
Ex. 10.33.3 Amendment-December2012-Lynch


Exhibit 10.33.3


December 10, 2012


Mr. Brian Lynch




		
	Re: 
	Amendment to Confidentiality, Non-Solicitation of Associates and Non-Competition Agreement




Dear Brian:


In consideration of your continued employment and other good and valuable consideration, this will confirm our agreement to amend the Confidentiality, Non-Solicitation of Associates and Non-Competition Agreement.  Effective immediately, the Agreement is amended as follows:


		
	(1)
	The following sentence is added to the end of Paragraph 2(c):




Subject to Paragraph 2(h), the Company will commence to pay the Separation Pay, if any, payable under this Paragraph 2(c), on the first scheduled payroll date following the fifty-third (53rd) day following your separation date, provided that you have executed and not revoked the separation agreement referenced in Paragraph 2(g).


		
	(2)
	The last sentence of Paragraph 2(d) is deleted and replaced with the following:




Provided that you have executed and not revoked the separation agreement referenced in Paragraph 2(g), the Company will pay the STIP bonus, if any, payable under this Paragraph 2(d) when bonuses are paid to other Company executives under the STIP Plan, or the annual cash bonus plan in effect at the time of termination, but in no event later than two and a half (21⁄2) months following the end of the performance period to which the STIP bonus relates.


		
	(3)
	The last sentence of Paragraph 2(e) is deleted and replaced with the following:




Provided that you have executed and not revoked the separation agreement referenced in Paragraph 2(g), the Company will pay the earned monies in the restricted cash feature of the STIP Plan, if any, in accordance with the payment schedule for active associates.  


		
	(4)
	The following sentence is added to the end of Paragraph 2(g):




You must sign the separation agreement within forty-five (45) days of receiving it.  If you do not revoke the separation agreement within seven (7) days, the separation agreement will become effective on the eighth (8th) day following your execution of such agreement.





Exhibit 10.33.3




Except as amended hereby, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  








ANN INC.                    


	
	
	/s/ Kay Krill






Kay Krill
President & Chief Executive Officer








Agreed:                    Date: December 19, 2012






	
	
	/s/ Brian Lynch




 
Brian Lynch
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7061

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KEVIN COMMANDER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-91-57-G, CA-97-686-2) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 27, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Kevin Commander, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Commander , Nos. CR-91-57-G; CA-97-686-2 (M.D.N.C. May 26, 1998). In addition, this Court will generally not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal. See Karpel v. Inova Health Sys. Servs. , 134 F.3d 1222, 1227 (4th Cir. 1998). We note there was sufficient evidence to sentence Appellant based upon crack cocaine. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 2:11-cr-00405-KSH Document 5 Filed 07/18/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 9
Case 2:11-cr-00405-KSH Document 5 Filed 07/18/11 Page 2 of 8 PageID: 10
Case 2:11-cr-00405-KSH Document 5 Filed 07/18/11 Page 3 of 8 PageID: 11
Case 2:11-cr-00405-KSH Document 5 Filed 07/18/11 Page 4 of 8 PageID: 12
Case 2:11-cr-00405-KSH Document 5 Filed 07/18/11 Page 5 of 8 PageID: 13
Case 2:11-cr-00405-KSH Document 5 Filed 07/18/11 Page 6 of 8 PageID: 14
Case 2:11-cr-00405-KSH Document 5 Filed 07/18/11 Page 7 of 8 PageID: 15
Case 2:11-cr-00405-KSH Document 5 Filed 07/18/11 Page 8 of 8 PageID: 16
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 11
                                ADE CORPORATION
            STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                            Three months ended                 Nine months ended
                                               January 31,                       January 31,
                                        ------------------------           ------------------------             
                                            1997        1996                   1997       1996
                                            ----        ----                   ----       ----
                                              (unaudited)                        (unaudited)
<S>                                     <C>         <C>                    <C>          <C>   
 
Net income                               $3,061,000   $2,224,000             $8,448,000   $5,226,000
                                         ==========   ==========             ==========   ==========
 
Weighted average common and
  common equivalent shares 
  outstanding during the period           8,050,000    8,063,000              8,015,000    6,892,000
 
Shares issuable pursuant to Staff
 Accounting Bulletin No. 83 (SAB 83)
 using treasury stock method                     --           --                     --       82,000
 
Shares used in computation                8,050,000    8,063,000              8,015,000    6,947,000
                                         ==========   ==========             ==========   ==========
 
Net income per share                     $     0.38   $     0.28             $     1.05   $     0.75
                                         ==========   ==========             ==========   ==========
 
</TABLE>


                                      14
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Brendan J. McGill, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

(1)   The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended
      September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C
      78m(a) or 78o(d); and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


                                                  By: /s/ Brendan J. McGill
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Brendan J. McGill
                                                      Senior Vice President and
                                                      Chief Financial Officer

Date: December 19, 2003

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Harleysville Savings Financial
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

This meeting is for the initial review of applications. 

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting. 

*Dates and Times:*

July 29, 2009, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Closed. 

July 30, 2009, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Closed. 

July 31, 2009, 10 a.m.-4 p.m. Closed. 

August 3, 2009, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Closed. 

August 4, 2009, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Closed. 

*Place:*                         W Hotel, 3377 Peachtree Road, NE., Atlanta, GA 30326, 770-488-3024 and teleconference.                     

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                     

*Matters to be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the review, discussion, and evaluation of the application received in response to “RFA-DP09-101SUPP09: Health Promotion ans Disease Prevention ResearchCenters: Special Interest Project Competitive Supplements (SIPS) (U48Panels A-M).”                     

*For More Information Contact:*                         Brenda Colley Gilbert, PhD, Director, Extramural Research Program Office, CCHP, 4770 Buford Highway, M/S K-92, Atlanta, GA 30341; 770-488-6295.                     

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                     

Dated: July 8, 2009. 

Elaine L. Baker, 

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-16647 Filed 7-13-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J ASON ST EP HEN BEL L, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 09- 50387 D . C . N o . 8 : 0 8 - c r - 0 0 0 8 7 - MMM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M ar gar e tM . M orr ow , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B e f o r e : S I L V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , N .R . S M I T H , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . J a s on S t e phe n B e l l appe a l s f r om the 108- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f ol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on f orr e c e i ptof

c hi l d pornogr aphy , i n vi ol a t i on of 18 U . S . C . § 2252A ( a ) ( 2) ( A ) . P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 38 6 U . S . 73 8 (19 67 ), 

# FI LED SEP 27 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 50387 2 B e l l ’ s c ouns e l ha s f

i l e d abr i e f

s t a t i ng the r e a r e no gr ounds f orr e l i e f , a l ong w i th a m ot i on t o w i thdr aw a s c ouns e l of r e c or d. W e ha ve pr ovi de d the appe l l antw i th the opportuni tyt o f

i l e apr o s e s uppl e m e nt a lbr i e f . N o pr o s e s uppl e m e nt a l br i e f or a ns w e r i ng br i e f

ha s be e n f

i l e d. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 - 8 1 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. W e d is m is s in lig h t o f

th e v a lidap p e a l w a iv e r . See U ni ted States v. N

gu ye n , 235 F . 3d 11 79 , 11 82 (9th C i r. 20 00 ). C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s GR AN T E D. DI S MI S S E D.