alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Skagit State Bancorp,Inc.  on Form 10-Q for the period endingJune 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), we, Cheryl Bishop, Chief Executive Officer, and Carla F.Tucker, Senior Vice-President/Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Bancorp, Inc.

 
| /s/Cheryl R. Bishop     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Cheryl R. Bishop        |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
|                    |
| /s/Carla F. Tucker      |   |
| Carla F. Tucker         |   |
| Senior Vice-President   |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |
|                    |
| August 13, 2007         |   |
| Date                    |

 

1

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of PRIMEDIA Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dean B. Nelson, Chairman,Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Dean  B. Nelson                               |     |     |
|---------------------------------------------------|----------|----------|
| Dean B. Nelson                                    |     |
| *Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President* | * * | * * |

 

August 7, 2007

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to theextent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by theCompany for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Civil Action No. 11-4052 (JLL) (JAD)

Civil Action No. 12-7300 (JLL) (JAD)

NOTICE OF APPEAL

EDWARD SCHWARTZ, on behalf 

of himself and others similarly 

situated,

 Plaintiff, 

 

vs.

AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, 

LLC, and AVIS BUDGET GROUP, 

INC.,

 Defendants.

DANIEL KLEIN and 

STEPHANIE KLEIN, on behalf of 

themselves and others similarly

situated,

 Plaintiffs,

vs. 

BUDGET RENT A CAR SYSTEM, 

INC. and AVIS BUDGET GROUP, 

INC.,

 Defendants.

Case 2:11-cv-04052-JLL-JAD Document 194 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 5091
2

Notice is hereby given that Class Member/Objector Mark Ray appeals to the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from the Opinion in Case No. 

12-7300 (JLL) (JAD) (Doc. No. 72) and Case No. 11-4052 (JLL) (JAD) (Doc. No. 

191) entered in this action on June 21, 2016 and the Order Granting Motion for Final 

Approval of Class Action Settlement, Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal in Case

No. 12-7300 (JLL) (JAD) (Doc. No. 73) and Case No. 11-4052 (JLL) (JAD) (Doc. 

No. 192) entered in this action on June 21, 2016 and all orders and opinions that 

merge therein. The Class Member/Objector also hereby appeals from any and all 

orders or judgments approving the class settlement, class counsel's attorneys' fees or 

expenses, and/or incentive awards to class representatives, and any order or judgment 

naming or identifying this Class Member/Objector or the objection filed by this Class 

Member/Objector, including any entered or signed subsequent to this notice of 

appeal. 

Dated: June 29, 2016.

/s/ Janet L. Gold, Esquire

Janet L. Gold, Esquire

Eisenberg, Gold, Cettei & Agrawal, P.C.

1040 North Kings Highway, Suite 200

Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08034

Telephone: (856) 330-6200

Facsimile: (856) 330-6207

Email: jgold@egclawfirm.com 

Attorney for Objector Mark Ray

Case 2:11-cv-04052-JLL-JAD Document 194 Filed 06/29/16 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 5092
3

Certificate of Service

The undersigned certifies that today she filed the foregoing Notice of Appeal 

on ECF which will send electronic notification to all attorneys registered for ECFfiling. The undersigned further certifies she caused to be served via USPS First Class 

Mail, postage prepaid, a copy of this Notice of Appeal upon the following:

Daniel R. Karon, Esq.Karon LLC

700 West St. Clair Avenue, Suite 200

Cleveland, Ohio 44113

Bruce D. Greenberg, Esq.

Lite DePalma Greenberg, LLC

570 Broad Street, Suite 1201

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Philip R. Sellinger, Esq.

Greenberg Traurig, LLP

500 Campus Drive

Florham Park, New Jersey 07932

Dated: June 29, 2016 /s/ Janet L. Gold, Esquire

Janet L. Gold, Esquire

Case 2:11-cv-04052-JLL-JAD Document 194 Filed 06/29/16 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 5093
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000661 29-SEP-2017 08:24 AM
#### WANECKE v. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, Inc., et al.

No. 26764.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

Jan. 25, 1950.

Harold S. Walters, Chicago, 111., C. W. Sellers, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Ed. D. Crocker, McKeehan, Merrick, Arter & Stewart, M. C. Harrison, Wm. K. Thomas, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant.

FREED, District Judge.

This is an action for wrongful death arising out of an accident involving airplane No. NC 93044, owned and operated by Northwest Airlines, Inc., and manufactured by the Glenn L. Martin Co. The latter moves to strike from the complaint certain language generally alleging the negligent manufacture of other airplanes of the type of NC 93044.

The plaintiff apparently included the language objected to as a prelude to the presentation of evidence of defects in other “Martin 202” airplanes in support of the central allegation that NC 93044 had been negligently manufactured. The admissibility of such evidence will be determined on trial. It is not affected by the presence in the complaint of this language, except perhaps insofar as the possibility of surprise has been obviated. Cf. Knight v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., D.C., 8 F.R.D. 256; Id.,8 F.R.D. 261.

Motions to strike are not regarded with favor and are ordinarily not granted unless the allegations attacked have no possible relation to the controversy or may prejudice the movant. Moore v. C. A. Olsen Mfg. Co., D.C., 7 F.R.D. 269. Although the language assailed perhaps may not perform any useful function in the complaint, prejudice to the defendant, in the event the proposed evidence is excluded at the time of trial, can be prevented either by proper instruction to the jury or by refusal to submit the pleadings to the jury.

Motion will be overruled.
Exhibit 32.2

Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer
of Tidelands Oil and Gas Corporation,  (the  "Company"),  herby certify that, to
the best of my  knowledge,  the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for
the period  ended  December  31, 2005 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the financial  condition  and results of operation of the Company.  A
signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 has been
provided  to the  registrant  and will be retained  by it and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: June 16, 2006.                                     /s/ James B. Smith
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                         Senior V.P. and CFO
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 EXTERRAN PARTNERS, L.P.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 /s/ Stephen A. SniderStephen A. SniderChief Executive Officer, Exterran GP LLCAs General Partner of Exterran General Partner, L.P.As General Partner of Exterran Partners, L.P.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1522

_____________________________

LEMUEL L. COOPER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

January 10, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Lemuel L. Cooper, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for 

Appellee.
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF   Document 91    Filed 11/01/11   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 3466

Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF   Document 91    Filed 11/01/11   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 3467
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 537

To authorize the grant program for elimination of the nationwide backlog 

in analyses of DNA samples at the level necessary to completely eliminate 

the backlog and obtain a DNA sample from every person convicted 

of a qualifying offense. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2003

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To authorize the grant program for elimination of the nationwide backlog in analyses of DNA samples at the level 

necessary to completely eliminate the backlog and obtain 

a DNA sample from every person convicted of a qualifying offense.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘DNA Database Com5 pletion Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 537 IH 

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF DNA BACKLOG GRANTS AT 

2 LEVEL NECESSARY TO COMPLETELY ELIMI3 NATE BACKLOG AND OBTAIN DNA SAMPLES 

4 FROM ALL PERSONS CONVICTED OF QUALI5 FYING OFFENSES. 

6 Subsection (j) of section 2 of the DNA Analysis 

7 Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–546; 

8 114 Stat. 2726; 42 U.S.C. 14135) is amended to read as 

9 follows: 

10 ‘‘(j) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

11 are authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney General 

12 for grants under subsection (a) $100,000,000 for each of 

13 fiscal years 2003 through 2007.’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 137 (Monday, July 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35165-35166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17152]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DOD-2009-OS-0085]


Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to Delete a System of Records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency is deleting a system of records 
notice in its existing inventory of record systems subject to the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This action will be effective without further notice on August 
19, 2009 unless comments are received that would result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: Chief Privacy and FOIA Officer, Headquarters Defense 
Logistics Agency, ATTN: DGA, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 1644, 
Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6221

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Lewis Oleinick at (703) 767-6194.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Logistics Agency notices for 
systems of records subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), 
as amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are 
available from the address above.
    The Defense Logistics Agency is proposing to delete a system of 
records notice in its existing inventory of record

[[Page 35166]]

systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. 
The proposed deletion is not within the purview of subsection (r) of 
the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires 
the submission of a new or altered system report.

    Dated: July 13, 2009.
Morgan E. Frazier,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
S434.15 DLA-C

SYSTEM NAME:
    Automated Payroll Cost and Personnel System (APCAPS).

REASON:
    Records are now covered under the DFAS Privacy notice T7205a, 
entitled ``Defense Business Management System (DBMS)'' published July 
2, 2009, at 74 FR 31711.

[FR Doc. E9-17152 Filed 7-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
RECE!VED 

APR 0 9 2014 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

tiJ 8:30.,__ M 

WILU.AM T. WALSir 

CLERK 

MARY ANN SIVOLELLA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, et al., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 11-4194 (PGS) 

PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 

This matter having come before the Court during a status conference on Apr~l 

4, 2014; and the Court having conferred with counsel following oral argument; and good 

cause appearing for the entry of the within Order; 

IT IS on this 8th day of April2014, 

ORDERED THAT: 

i 

1. The deadline to complete the remaining fact discovery agreed upon durin~ 

the status conference is May 5, 2014. 1 

2. The date by which Plaintiff must serve expert disclosures and reports is 

extended to June 4, 2014. ' 

3. To date by which Defendants must serve expert disclosures and reports is 

extended to July 4, 2014. 

i 

4. Counsel must meet and confer in an attempt to resolve any discovery or c~ase 

management disputes before making such dispute the subject of a motion. No discovery mot.on 

will be entertained absent counsel's full compliance with L. CIV. R. 37.1(a)(1); see also L. C~rv. 

R. 16.1(f). Any unresolved disputes must be brought to the Court's attention immediately.: 

5. The Court will conduct a telephone status conference on June 9, 2014 at ]:00 

P.M. Defense counsel will initiate this call. 

6. The Court may, from time to time, schedule conferences as may be requi 1ed, 

either on its own motion or .at the request of counsel. Failure to appear at subsequ~nt 

conferences, or to comply with any of the terms of this Order, may result in sanctions. 

Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 80 Filed 04/09/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1764
7. Since all dates set forth herein are established with the assistance and knowle~lge 

of counsel, there will be no further extensions absent extraordinary circumstances. 1 

s/ Douglas E. Arpert 

DOUGLAS E. ARPERT 

United States Magistrate Judge 

ALL PROPOSED ORDERS AND LETTER MEMORANDA SENT TO CHAMBERS SHOU'LD 

BE IN WORDPERFECT FORMAT AND E-MAILED TO: dea_orders@njd.uscourts.gov. A~Y FILINGS WITH THE CLERK'S OFFICE SHOULD BE IN PDF FORMAT. 1 

i 

Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 80 Filed 04/09/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1765
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ERIC J. RHETT,

Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.:1:09-CV-64-SPM/AK

FIREMANS INSURANCE CO., et al,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge's Report

and Recommendation (doc. 7). The parties have been furnished a copy and have

been afforded an opportunity to file objections. The Plaintiff has filed three

objections (docs. 8, 9, and 10) and two memos in support of his objections (docs.

11 and 12). Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have

made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and

Recommendation to which an objection has been made. Having considered the

objections, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be

adopted.

Venue for civil cases is governed by 28 U.S.C § 1391, which states that

venue is proper in the district court “where any defendant resides, if all defendants

Case 3:09-cv-02727-PGS-DEA Document 13 Filed 06/04/09 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 103
2

reside in the same State.” All the Defendants in this case reside in New Jersey. 

Therefore, as stated by the Magistrate Judge, the United States District Court for

the District of New Jersey is the proper venue for this cause of action. Despite

Plaintiff’s objections, there is no connection to Florida that would justify this Court

hearing this case or ruling on pending motions. Consequently, Plaintiff must

defend his rights and prosecute his case in New Jersey, the home state of Plaintiff

and of the Defendants.

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 7) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is hereby transferred to the United States District Court for

the District of New Jersey.

3. The Clerk is directed to immediately take all steps necessary to

effectuate the transfer.

 DONE AND ORDERED this fourth day of June, 2009.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02727-PGS-DEA Document 13 Filed 06/04/09 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 104
##### 



Exhibit 2.2
 Amendment No. 1
to
Purchase Agreement
 Agreement GLG Sellers
Representative Buyers Representative
 Preliminary Statements
 Purchase Agreement
 1. Defined Terms.
 Effective Date
 2. Amendment of Purchase Agreement.




---



##### 



3. Governing Law.
 4. Execution in Counterparts.
 5. Effect on the Transaction Documents.
 6. Effectiveness of Agreement.
  Dated:  March 4, 2008
    GLG PARTNERS, INC.By:
    /s/ Noam GottesmanName:
    Noam GottesmanTitle:
    Co-Chief Executive OfficerDated:  March 4, 2008
    /s/ Jared BluesteinJared Bluestein, as Buyers RepresentativeDated:  March 4, 2008
    /s/ Noam GottesmanNoam Gottesman, as Sellers Representative 2
Chart 1-1. More than half of the population 16 years of age 

and over works full time

Employed full time

(116.4 million)

Others not in 

the labor force

(75.2 million) Employed part time for 

economic reasons 

(4.4 million)

Marginally attached workers,

including discouraged workers

(1.5 million)

Unemployed (7.6 million)

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Employed part time for 

noneconomic reasons

(21.0 million)

2005

Chart 1-1. More than half of the population 16 years of age 

and over works full time

• More than half of the 226 million persons in the civilian noninstitutional 

working-age population in 2005 were employed full time. An additional 11 

percent were working part time, with a large majority of these workers 

preferring a part-time schedule.

• Of the third of the population not in the labor force (neither working nor 

looking for work), a relatively small number (1.5 million) were classified as 

"marginally attached" workers—persons who want to work, are available for 

work, and had looked for a job in the past year but are not currently looking 

either because they are discouraged about job prospects or because certain 

conditions, like family responsibilities, impede their entry into the job market.

• The vast majority of persons not in the labor force do not want to work.
Case 2:11-cv-03091-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 05/27/11 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1
Case 2:11-cv-03091-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 05/27/11 Page 2 of 15 PageID: 2
Case 2:11-cv-03091-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 05/27/11 Page 3 of 15 PageID: 3
Case 2:11-cv-03091-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 05/27/11 Page 4 of 15 PageID: 4
Case 2:11-cv-03091-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 05/27/11 Page 5 of 15 PageID: 5
Case 2:11-cv-03091-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 05/27/11 Page 6 of 15 PageID: 6
Case 2:11-cv-03091-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 05/27/11 Page 7 of 15 PageID: 7
Case 2:11-cv-03091-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 05/27/11 Page 8 of 15 PageID: 8
Case 2:11-cv-03091-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 05/27/11 Page 9 of 15 PageID: 9
Case 2:11-cv-03091-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 05/27/11 Page 10 of 15 PageID: 10
Case 2:11-cv-03091-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 05/27/11 Page 11 of 15 PageID: 11
Case 2:11-cv-03091-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 05/27/11 Page 12 of 15 PageID: 12
Case 2:11-cv-03091-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 05/27/11 Page 13 of 15 PageID: 13
Case 2:11-cv-03091-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 05/27/11 Page 14 of 15 PageID: 14
Case 2:11-cv-03091-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 05/27/11 Page 15 of 15 PageID: 15
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of
title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Orchid Cellmark Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Form
10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                                                                                               
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:    May 23, 2006 |  | /S/    GEORGE H. POSTE, DVM,
PH.D.                                                                            
|                       |  | George H. Poste Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer)                                           
|                       | 
|Dated:    May 23, 2006 |  | /S/    RAYMOND J.
LAND                                                                                        
|                       |  | Raymond J. Land Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.