alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (ii) "Fund" means any registered investment company            adopting this Code of Ethics.                 |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (iii) "Compliance Officer" means the person so designated            by the Adviser to act in that capacity. |
|   | Adviser does not include any consultant or sub-advisor          whose only role is to advise on general principles.    |
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF PERIODIC REPORT**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended                January                31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended,                and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                   |                                                     |
|--------------|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|         |                                   |
|    |                              |                                                |
|         |                                   | /s/ JAY              C.              PETERSON  |
|         | Jay              C. Peterson           |
|         | Chief                Financial Officer |
|         | March 14, 2006                    |

----
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 By:
Name:
    
    /s/ Michael Nole

Michael NoleTitle:
    
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    November 19, 2009
### Expense Limitation and Fee Waiver Agreement

Saturna Capital Corporation is undertaking to continue to waive its advisory and administration fee and, to the extent necessary, reimburse expenses, to ensure that the total net annual operating expenses (excluding taxes, commissions, and extraordinary expenses) of each Fund listed below, through March 31, 2017, is not more than as set forth in the table below:

| Fund                            | Annual Total Net Operating Expenses |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Short Term Bond Fund            | 0.75%                               |
| Bond Income Fund                | 0.90%                               |
| Global High Income Fund         | 0.90%                               |
| Saturna Sustainable Equity Fund | 0.99%                               |
| Saturna Sustainable Bond Fund   | 0.89%                               |

In addition, with respect to Sextant Short-Term Bond Fund, Sextant Bond Income Fund and Sextant Core Fund (each, a "Fund"), Saturna Capital Corporation is undertaking to waive its entire management fee payable by the Fund on days when the total assets of the Fund are under $2 million.

The undertakings described above may be canceled with respect to any of these Funds only with the consent of the Board of Trustees or the termination of the management contract of any such Fund with Saturna Capital Corporation.

| SATURNA INVESTMENT TRUST

By: */s/ Nicholas F. Kaiser*Name: Nicholas F. KaiserTitle: PresidentDate: Decemebr 22, 2015 | SATURNA CAPITAL CORPORATION

By: */s/ Jane K. Carten*Name: Jane K. CartenTitle: PresidentDate: December 22, 2015 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

24. Unemployed persons by marital status, race, age, and sex

Marital status, race, and age

Men Women

Thousands of

persons

Unemployment

rates

Thousands of

persons

Unemployment

rates

1998 1999 1998 1999 1998 1999 1998 1999

 Total, 16 years and over ............................................. 3,266 3,066 4.4 4.1 2,944 2,814 4.6 4.3

Married, spouse present ................................................... 1,034 990 2.4 2.2 985 921 2.9 2.7

Widowed, divorced, or separated ..................................... 435 411 4.8 4.6 628 585 4.9 4.5

Single (never married) ...................................................... 1,798 1,665 8.5 7.8 1,332 1,308 7.8 7.4

 White, 16 years and over ............................................ 2,431 2,274 3.9 3.6 2,053 1,999 3.9 3.8

Married, spouse present ................................................... 836 797 2.2 2.1 808 749 2.7 2.5

Widowed, divorced, or separated ..................................... 334 320 4.5 4.3 449 427 4.4 4.2

Single (never married) ...................................................... 1,261 1,157 7.4 6.7 797 823 6.3 6.3

 Black, 16 years and over ............................................ 671 626 8.9 8.2 756 684 9.0 7.8

Married, spouse present ................................................... 133 130 3.9 3.8 120 119 4.5 4.2

Widowed, divorced, or separated ..................................... 84 77 6.9 6.3 156 134 7.0 6.1

Single (never married) ...................................................... 455 419 15.4 14.0 480 430 13.5 11.7

 Total, 25 years and over ............................................. 1,998 1,870 3.2 3.0 1,926 1,805 3.6 3.3

Married, spouse present ................................................... 980 925 2.3 2.1 878 828 2.7 2.5

Widowed, divorced, or separated ..................................... 415 393 4.8 4.5 590 544 4.8 4.3

Single (never married) ...................................................... 602 553 5.5 4.9 458 433 5.4 4.9

 White, 25 years and over ............................................ 1,516 1,415 2.8 2.6 1,361 1,294 3.1 2.9

Married, spouse present ................................................... 790 744 2.1 2.0 717 671 2.5 2.4

Widowed, divorced, or separated ..................................... 318 305 4.4 4.3 418 396 4.3 4.0

Single (never married) ...................................................... 407 366 4.7 4.2 226 227 3.8 3.8

 Black, 25 years and over ............................................ 373 345 6.0 5.4 471 423 6.8 5.9

Married, spouse present ................................................... 126 120 3.8 3.6 109 107 4.3 4.0

Widowed, divorced, or separated ..................................... 81 74 6.8 6.2 151 127 6.9 5.9

Single (never married) ...................................................... 166 152 9.5 8.4 211 188 9.5 8.1

 NOTE: Beginning in January 1999, data reflect revised population controls used in the household survey.

200
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, the undersigned, Jay C. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer, of Forgent
Networks, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:  1.
    
    The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
period ended January 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ JAY C. PETERSONJay C. Peterson
Chief Financial Officer
March 16, 2004
H. R. 5363

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To authorize salary adjustments for Justices and judges of the United States for

fiscal year 2005.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR FEDERAL

JUSTICES AND JUDGES.

Pursuant to section 140 of Public Law 97–92, Justices and

judges of the United States are authorized during fiscal year 2005

to receive a salary adjustment in accordance with section 461 of

title 28, United States Code.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
John E. Flaherty

Partner 

T. 973.639.7903 

F. 973.297.3971 

jflaherty@mccarter.com

McCarter & English, LLP 

Four Gateway Center 

100 Mulberry Street 

Newark, NJ 07102-4056 

T. 973.622.4444 

F. 973.624.7070 

www.mccarter.com 

BOSTON

HARTFORD 

NEW YORK 

NEWARK 

PHILADELPHIA 

STAMFORD 

WILMINGTON 

June 18, 2013 

VIA ECF 

Hon. Lois H. Goodman, U.S.M.J. 

U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey 

Clarkson S. Fisher Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse 

402 East State Street 

Trenton, New Jersey 08608 

Re: Orexo AB v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al., 

 Civil Action No. 11-3788 (FLW) (LHG) 

Dear Judge Goodman: 

Our firm, along with our co-counsel Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy 

LLP, represents Plaintiff Orexo AB in the above-referenced matter. We write to 

inform the Court that Orexo has decided not to file a brief in opposition to 

Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File Its First Amended Answer to Complaint, 

Separate Defenses, and Counterclaims. In light of the Court’s reasoning and 

order during the June 17, 2013 teleconference permitting discovery relating to 

inequitable conduct while Mylan’s motion to add that defense is pending, Orexo 

believes it will be more efficient for the parties to direct their attention towards 

completing discovery at this time. Orexo maintains that Mylan’s allegations are 

factually deficient and legally baseless, and should have never been asserted. 

Orexo intends to seek summary judgment that there has been no inequitable 

conduct after the parties complete discovery. 

Respectfully submitted, 

s/John E. Flaherty 

John E. Flaherty 

cc: Counsel of Record (via email) 

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW-LHG Document 135 Filed 06/18/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 3670
EXHIBIT 32

                      Rule 13a-14(b) Certification

The undersigned officer certifies that this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Headliners
Entertainment Group, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Headliners Entertainment Group, Inc. and will be retained by
Headliners Entertainment Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
 Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

April 4, 2006                        /s/ Eduardo Rodriguez
                                     -----------------------------------
                                     Eduardo Rodriguez (Chief executive
                                     officer and chief financial officer)
#### Tina Lai Gallais-Pradal, Appellant, v YWCA of Brooklyn, Respondent.

[822 NYS2d 314]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), dated May 2, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied her cross motion for sanctions against the defendant for spoliation of evidence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell on a puddle of water in the women’s locker room of the defendant’s premises. The defendant met its initial burden of making a prima facie showing that it did not create or have actual or constructive notice of the alleged defect (see *Marino v Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.,*21 AD3d 531, 532 [2005]; *Galietta v New York Sports Club,*4 AD3d 449 [2004]; *Stumacher v Waldbaum, Inc.,*274 AD2d 572 [2000]; *Goldman v Waldbaum, Inc.,*248 AD2d 436 [1998]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the defendant’s general awareness that the locker room floor where the plaintiff fell, which was in close proximity to the showers and a swimming pool, sometimes became wet, was insufficient to provide notice of the specific wet condition which caused the plaintiff to fall *(see Berzon v D’Agostino Supermarkets, Inc.,*15 AD3d 600 [2005]; *Gloria v*
      *661
      *MGM Emerald Enters.,*298 AD2d 355, 356 [2002]; *Kraemer v K-Mart Corp.,*226 AD2d 590, 591 [1996]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, JJR, Santucci, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.
Sommer Barnard Attorneys, PC 

March 20, 2007

Saturna Investment Trust  C/O Saturna Capital  1300 North State Street  Bellingham, Washington 98225-4730

 
> 
Re: Amendment to Form N-1A

 

Gentlemen:

In accordance with the registration      of an indefinite number of units (“Units”)  registered by Saturna Investment Trust (the “Trust”)  for its Funds, we have been asked to provide the  opinion of counsel required to be filed as  an exhibit to the Trust’s registration statement  on Form N-1A (the “Registration  Statement”). In rendering this opinion, we  have examined such documents (including the audited  financial statements of the Funds as of November  30,  2006), records and questions of law as we deemed  it necessary to examine for the purpose of this opinion.  Based on that examination and investigation, it  is our opinion that the Units will be, upon issuance,  validly issued, fully paid and not liable to further  assessments.

We consent to the filing of this letter as an      exhibit to Post Effective Amendment No. 29 to      the Registration Statement.

Sincerely,

SOMMER BARNARD PC  /s/Sommer Barnard PC

 

 

----

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the references to our firm in      the Registration Statement, (Form N-1A), and      related Statement of Additional Information of      the Saturna      Investment Trust and to the inclusion of our      report dated January 17, 2007 to the Shareholders      and Board of Trustees of the Sextant Short-Term      Bond      Fund, Sextant Bond Income Fund, Sextant Core      Fund, Sextant Growth Fund, Sextant International      Fund and Idaho      Tax      Exempt Fund, each a series of the Saturna Investment      Trust. 

 
> 
TAIT, WELLER & BAKER LLP

 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  March 20, 2007
|     |                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                      |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                                                    |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                    |
| /s/ Gerald P. Plush                                                |
| Name: Gerald P. Plush                                              |
| Title: Chief Financial Officer and Senior Executive Vice President |
Exhibit 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Millennium Electronics, Inc.
File No. 33-0750730

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Millennium  Electronics,  Inc.
(the  Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Douglas P. Morris,  President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Douglas P. Morris
President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

November 13, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2099

CHRISTIANA TRUST, a division of Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, not 

in its individual capacity, but solely as owner trustee on behalf of RBSHD 2013-1 

Trust,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

and

BANK OF AMERICA, NA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JULIETT MARSH-DAVIS,

Defendant – Appellant,

and

CORNELL D. DAVIS; AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK; 

CARRIAGE LANE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:17-cv-01502-RMG)

Submitted: December 21, 2017 Decided: December 27, 2017
2

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Juliett Marsh-Davis, Appellant Pro Se. William Price Stork, SCOTT & CORLEY, P.A., 

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Juliett Marsh-Davis has noted an appeal from the district court’s order adopting the 

magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, granting the Plaintiff’s motion to remand, 

and remanding a removed foreclosure action to South Carolina state court. Pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2012), an order remanding a case from which it was removed is not 

reviewable on appeal. The district court remanded Marsh-Davis’ removed action for lack 

of subject matter jurisdiction. Because the district court remanded the action for lack of 

subject matter jurisdiction, we lack jurisdiction to review the order. Accordingly, we grant 

the Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16557]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1340-000]


Grand Ridge Energy III LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

July 7, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Grand Ridge Energy III LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is July 27, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#82c4c7d0c1cdeceeebece7d1f7f2f2edf0f6c2e4e7f0e1ace5edf4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dd9b988f9e92b3b1b4b3b88ea8adadb2afa99dbbb8afbef3bab2ab">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-16557 Filed 7-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiffs,

V.

JOHN ALFY SALAMA MARKUS,

Defendants.

Criminal No.: 2:11-366 (JLL) 01

ORDER

Please be advised that oral argument on defendant’s motion as against the Government

[docket entry # 41] is scheduled for Wednesday, September 5, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom

5D of the Martin Luther King Jr., Federal Building, 50 Walnut Street, Newark, New Jersey. All

parties are hereby required to appear.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

L. Linares,

nited States District Judge

Dated: July 19, 2012

Case 2:11-cr-00366-JLL Document 44 Filed 07/20/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 325