alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 537 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 537

   To authorize the grant program for elimination of the nationwide 
backlog in analyses of DNA samples at the level necessary to completely 
    eliminate the backlog and obtain a DNA sample from every person 
                   convicted of a qualifying offense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2003

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the grant program for elimination of the nationwide 
backlog in analyses of DNA samples at the level necessary to completely 
    eliminate the backlog and obtain a DNA sample from every person 
                   convicted of a qualifying offense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``DNA Database Completion Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF DNA BACKLOG GRANTS AT LEVEL NECESSARY TO 
              COMPLETELY ELIMINATE BACKLOG AND OBTAIN DNA SAMPLES FROM 
              ALL PERSONS CONVICTED OF QUALIFYING OFFENSES.

    Subsection (j) of section 2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination 
Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-546; 114 Stat. 2726; 42 U.S.C. 14135) is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(j) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Attorney General for grants under subsection (a) 
$100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2003 through 2007.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000885051
<NAME> TMP INLAND EMPIRE II, LTD.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           44321
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5951
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    5633198
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5683470
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5683470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           286749
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     5396721
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5683470
<SALES>                                            975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   975
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1654
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (679)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (679)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (679)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

TO: CLERK OF THE ABOVE-NAMED COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby enters an appearance as additional 

counsel for defendant Andrew Auernheimer in the above-entitled action.

Law Office of Nace Naumoski

618 Newark Avenue

Elizabeth, NJ 07208

tel. 908-349-8462 fax 908-325-1646

nace@naumoski.com

Attorney for Defendant,

Andrew Auernheimer

By: 

 Nace Naumoski (NN-8021)

/s/ Nace Naumoski

________________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

 -vsANDREW AUERNHEIMER,

Criminal No.: 2:11-cr-470 (SDW)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Defendant.

________________________________________ 

Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 36 Filed 03/27/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 105
24(b)(4)
                           Specimen Stock Certificates


                              The AAL Mutual Funds

                              ---------------------
                                  Name of Fund

                              ---------------------
                                  Name of Class

                         A Massachusetts Business Trust



     This certifies that  ______________________________________ is the owner of
________ shares of beneficial interest, $.01 par value, of The AAL Mutual Funds,
_____________________________  established  as a Trust under the laws of the
      (Name  of  Fund)         Commonwealth  of  Massachusetts  by a Declaration
of Trust  effective  March 13, 1987. The interest  represented  hereby is 
transferable only on the books of the Trust by the  holder  hereof  in person or
by a duly  authorized  attorney  upon surrender of this Certificate to the 
Transfer Agent properly endorsed.
     This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent.
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Trust has caused this Certificate to be signed
by its facsimile signatures of its duly authorized  officers,  and the facsimile
of its Trust Seal.

Dated: ________________________         

/s/ Robert G. Same                           /s/ Ronald G. Anderson
Secretary                                    President
Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant To
18
U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Paul B. Dykstra, Chief Executive
Officer of Viad Corp, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
  
  the report on Form 10-Q of Viad Corp for the
fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  2.
  
  the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Viad Corp. Date: November 5, 2010 By /s/ Paul B.
Dykstra

Paul B. Dykstra 
Chief Executive Officer  3
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jair Lipscombe, Appellant.

[854 NYS2d 452]

*782At the plea proceeding, the defendant was not advised that he would be subject to a period of post-release supervision as part of an enhanced sentence if he failed to comply with the conditions of his plea. After the defendant failed to appear on the scheduled sentencing date, the Supreme Court imposed the maximum sentence plus three years’ post-release supervision. As the People correctly concede, the failure to advise the defendant of post-release supervision at the time of his plea requires reversal of his conviction *(see People v Louree, 8*NY3d 541 [2007]; *People v Pagan,*43 AD3d 1086 [2007]). Spolzino, J.P., Skelos, Lifson and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5106 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5106

  To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to expand the Agricultural 
     Management Assistance Program to include the State of Hawaii.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 2004

   Mr. Case introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to expand the Agricultural 
     Management Assistance Program to include the State of Hawaii.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF THE AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

    Section 524(b)(1) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 
1524(b)(1)) is amended by inserting ``Hawaii,'' after ``Delaware,''.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-3081

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Michael Shane Golden

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs

____________

Submitted: July 17, 2018

Filed: July 20, 2018

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Michael Golden directly appeals the within-Guidelines sentence the district

court

1

imposed after he pled guilty to a firearm offense pursuant to a plea agreement

1The Honorable Susan O. Hickey, United States DistrictJudge for the Western

District of Arkansas.
containing an appeal waiver. Golden’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed

a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the substantive

and procedural reasonableness of Golden’s sentence. Golden has filed a pro se

supplemental brief, in which he challenges the reasonableness of his sentence and

appears to claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.

Asto the arguments challenging the procedural and substantive reasonableness

of the sentence, we conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, applicable, and

enforceable. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo

review of validity and applicability of appeal waiver); United States v. Andis, 333

F.3d 886, 890-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing enforcement of appeal

waivers).

Further, we decline to consider Golden’s ineffective-assistance claim in this

direct appeal, see United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez, 449 F.3d 824, 826-27 (8th

Cir. 2006) (ineffective-assistance claims are best litigated in collateral proceedings,

where record can be properly developed).

Finally, having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio,

488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues outside the scope of the appeal

waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we dismiss this

appeal.

______________________________

-2-
EXHIBIT 12.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Wolfgang Ziebart, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Infineon Technologies AG; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the company and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period duringwhich this annual report is being prepared;  (b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003)]  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annualreport based on such evaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this annual report any change in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual reportthat as materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal controls over financialreporting.Date: November 23, 2005         By:                                                              /s/ DR. WOLFGANG ZIEBART       Dr. Wolfgang Ziebart
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Grace 2,
      Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending August 31, 2007, I, Virginia K.
      Sourlis, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
      hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
      and
      belief, that:





1.
      Such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending August 31, 2007, fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
      ending August 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      October 5, 2007


By: /s/
              VIRGINIA K. SOURLISVirginia
                K. Sourlis
The AAL Mutual Funds

        Supplement Dated June 2, 1997, to the prospectus dated January 8,
     1997, for The AAL Mutual Funds (The AAL Capital Growth, Mid Cap Stock,
        Small Cap Stock, International, Utilities, Bond, Municipal Bond,
                    High Yield Bond and Money Market Funds).

       Proposed Change to Objective and Industry Concentration Policy --
                             The AAL Utilities Fund

The Board of Trustees of The AAL Mutual  Funds is  recommending  a change to the
investment objective and industry concentration policy of The AAL Utilities Fund
(the "Fund").  Presently,  the Fund seeks current  income,  long-term  growth of
income and capital growth by investing  primarily in a diversified  portfolio of
public utilities securities. As a matter of fundamental policy, the Fund invests
at least sixty-five  percent (65%) of its assets in securities  issued by public
utilities  companies.  Recent  developments  within the utilities  industry have
caused the number of public  utilities  securities  appropriate to achieving the
Fund's objective,  and which otherwise meet the Fund's investment  criteria,  to
decline. The Board of Trustees concluded that the Fund's industry  concentration
policy is impeding its ability to achieve its investment objective.

Accordingly,  the  Board of  Trustees  is  recommending  that the Fund no longer
concentrate its investments in the public utilities  industry.  Rather, the Fund
should continue its present  objective to seek current income,  long-term growth
of income and capital  growth by investing in equity  securities  and securities
exchangeable or convertible  into equity  securities  issued by companies in any
industry.  The Fund would seek  securities it believes offer higher than average
dividend  yields and favorable  prospects for future growth and  dividends.  The
Fund  would  seek  securities  fitting  these  criteria  that  it  believes  are
underpriced  relative to securities of companies with  comparable  fundamentals,
thereby offering an opportunity for capital appreciation.

Because the Fund's investment  objective and industry  concentration  policy are
fundamental,  the proposed change is subject to approval by shareholders.  Proxy
material will be prepared and circulated to shareholders of the Fund in mid-June
1997 to  recommend,  and solicit  their  approval  of, the proposed  change.  If
approved by the  shareholders,  the proposed change would take effect  beginning
September  1,  1997,  at which  time the Fund  would  change its name to The AAL
Equity Income Fund.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from The
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of ADE Corporation for the nine
months ended January 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                          69,296
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     28,546
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,632
<PP&E>                                          22,315
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 167,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,154
<BONDS>                                          8,707
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              111
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     140,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   167,477
<SALES>                                         99,386
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,386
<CGS>                                           44,080
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,840
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,447
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,913
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,391
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,522
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,830
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.83
        

</TABLE>
#### Walterina MIRANDA-MURILLO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.

No. 12-3374.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted April 5, 2013.*

Decided April 9, 2013.

Joseph W. Murphy, Attorney, Gresk *&*Singleton, Indianapolis, IN, for Petitioner.

*611Edward C. Durant, Attorney, OIL, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.

*

 The court granted the parties’ joint motion to waive oral argument.

Order

Walterina Miranda-Murillo, a citizen of Honduras, was ordered removed from the United States following her conviction for misuse of a Social Security number in order to deceive an employer into thinking that her immigration status allowed employment. See 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(7)(B). She asked for discretionary relief, such as cancellation of removal, but the Board of Immigration Appeals concluded that her offense is a “crime of moral turpitude.” An alien who has committed such an offense lacks the good moral character required for discretionary relief. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229b(b)(l)(B), 1229c(b)(l)(B).

The Board deems offenses that entail fraud to be crimes of moral turpitude. Miranda-Murillo contends that the Board’s understanding of “moral turpitude” is mistaken and asks this court to follow *Beltran-Tirado v. INS,*213 F.3d 1179 (9th Cir.2000). Other courts of appeals have rejected *Beltran-Tirado*and held that the Board is entitled to use the understanding of “moral turpitude” that it has followed for many years and to conclude that offenses such as § 408(a)(7)(B) come within it. See, e.g., *Guardado-Garda v. Holder,*615 F.3d 900, 902-03 (8th Cir.2010); *Serrato-Soto v. Holder,*570 F.3d 686, 692 (6th Cir.2009); *Hyder v. Keisler,*506 F.3d 388, 393 (5th Cir.2007). See also *Lateef v. Department of Homeland Security,*592 F.3d 926, 928, 931 (8th Cir.2010); *Omagah v. Ashcroft,*288 F.3d 254, 261-62 (5th Cir.2002).

In *Marin-Rodriguez v. Holder,*710 F.3d 734 (7th Cir.2013), this court disagreed with *Beltran-Tirado*and held that the Board acted within its authority when concluding that offenses arising from the misuse of Social Security cards and Social Security numbers are “crimes of moral turpitude.” In light of *Marinr-Rodriguez,*Miranda-Murillo’s petition for review must be denied. She has done all that is necessary to preserve an entitlement to ask the Supreme Court to resolve the conflict and should direct her arguments to that forum.

The petition for review is denied.