alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2


Section 906 Certifications

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the following  certifications were made to accompany
the Form 10-KSB/A.

                 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of
          Quintek Technologies, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         In connection with the annual report of Quintek Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/SBA for the year ended June 30, 2002, Andrew Haag hereby
certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

         1. The annual report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.The  information  contained in the annual report fairly presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


February 5, 2003

/s/  ANDREW HAAG
--------------------------------------------
     Andrew Haag, Chief Financial Officer


         The above  certification  is furnished  solely to accompany  the Report
pursuant to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  Section
1350)  and is not  being  filed  as part of the  Form  10-K/A  or as a  separate
disclosure statement.

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the following  certifications were made to accompany
the Form 10-KSB/A.

                 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of
          Quintek Technologies, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         In connection with the annual report of Quintek Technologies,  Inc (the
"Company")  on Form  10-KSB/A  for the year ended June 30, 2002,  Robert  Steele
hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of his
knowledge:

         1.The annual  report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.The  information  contained in the annual report fairly presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


February 5, 2003

/s/  ROBERT STEELE
-------------------------------------------
     Robert Steele, Chief Executive Officer


         The above  certification  is furnished  solely to accompany  the Report
pursuant to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  Section
1350)  and is not  being  filed as part of the Form  10-KSB/A  or as a  separate
disclosure statement.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Cheryl R. Bishop,certify that:

1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Skagit State Bancorp, Inc.;

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)           Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)           Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date:  |  November  13, 2006 |                     | /s/ Cheryl R. Bishop |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   |                     | Cheryl R. Bishop         |
|   |                     | Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
#### Taylor *et al. v.*New England Mortgage Security Co.

Lumpkin, J. — There being several plaintiffs in error in the bill of exceptions sued out in .this case, an affidavit by one only of them of inability from poverty to pay the costs is not sufficient to bring the case to this court *informa pauperis.*No such affidavit having been duly filed by the other plaintiffs in error, and counsel for the plaintiffs in error having, up to the time of the calling of the case for trial in this court, neglected or refused to pay the costs, the writ of error is dismissed, in accordance with the provisions of rule 44 of the Supreme Court.

December 8,1894.

Affidavit *informa pauperis.*

Ejectment was brought against John Taylor, Nancy E. Renfroe and Charles T. Taylor. There was a verdict against them, and they excepted to the overruling of their motion for a new trial. The pauper affidavit was: “Personally appeared before me N. E. Renfroe and John Taylor, who upon oath says, that they are unable from his poverty to pay costs in the above stated case, and that their counsel has advised them that they has good cause for a writ of error.” Signed by John Taylor and N. E. Renfroe.

J. N. Gilmore and Jordan & Tyson, for plaintiffs in error. Evans & Evans, *contra.*

*Writ of error dismissed.*
ETN 12.31.2012 EX 10(oo)


Exhibit 10(oo)




AMENDMENT TO
EATON CORPORATION SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS PLAN I
(January 1, 1989 Restatement)
WHEREAS, the Corporation maintains in effect the Eaton Corporation Supplemental Benefits Plan I under a January 1, 1989 Restatement, as amended (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, the Pension Administration Committee reserves the right to amend the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Pension Administration Committee wishes to amend the Plan in order to reflect the corporate restructuring of Eaton Corporation pursuant to which common shares of Eaton Corporation will be converted into ordinary shares of Eaton Corporation plc.
NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is amended, effective as of the Merger Effective Time described in the Transaction Agreement dated May 21, 2012, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Transaction Agreement, dated June 22, 2012, and Amendment No. 2 to the Transaction Agreement, dated October 19, 2012, between Cooper Industries plc, Eaton Corporation, Abeiron Limited, Comdell Limited, Turlock B.V., and Turlock Corporation, to provide as follows: 
1. Section 2(a) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
(a)    “Pension Administration Committee” means the committee comprised of corporate officers of Eaton Corporation plc appointed by the Board of Directors from time to time to administer the retirement benefit programs of Eaton Corporation plc and any of its subsidiaries.
2. Section 2(b) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
(b)    “Board of Directors” means the Board of Directors of Eaton Corporation plc.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Pension Administration Committee has caused this Amendment to be executed through duly authorized persons on this ____ day of November, 2012.




PENSION ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE


By:  __________________________________ 


Title: _________________________________
Case 2:11-cv-04287-KM-SCM Document 90-1 Filed 09/18/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 2770
Case 2:11-cv-04287-KM-SCM Document 90-1 Filed 09/18/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2771
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x 

ANTHONY STOKES, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

JOHN STEPHENS a/k/a JOHN LEGEND, 

SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, 

COLUMBIA RECORDS, GETTING OUT OUR 

DREAMS, INC. d/b/a G.O.O.D. Music, JOHN 

DOES 1-20, fictitious persons, and XYZ 

CORPORATIONS 1-20, fictitious entities, 

Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x 

CASE NO.: 2:11-cv-03849 

(SDW) (MCA) 

ECF CASE

RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE FOR 

DEFENDANTS SONY MUSIC 

ENTERTAINMENT AND 

COLUMBIA RECORDS 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, the undersigned counsel for Defendants 

SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT and COLUMBIA RECORDS (collectively “Sony Music,” as 

Columbia Records has been erroneously sued herein as a separate legal entity), certifies as follows: 

Columbia Records is an unincorporated division of Sony Music. Sony Music is a Delaware 

general partnership and has no stock. Sony Corporation Japan is a publicly-held company, and is the 

ultimate parent company of Sony Music. 

Dated: September 13, 2011 

 New York, New York 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 

 PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 

 By:__s/ Dolores DiBella_________ 

 Dolores F. DiBella (DD 9637) 

Eleven Times Square 

New York, New York 10036 

Telephone: 212.969.3000 

Facsimile: 212.969.2900 

ddibella@proskauer.com 

 Attorney for Defendants 

Case 2:11-cv-03849-SDW -MCA Document 10 Filed 09/13/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 63
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I caused the following counsel of record for Plaintiff to be served with a 

copy of the foregoing document via ECF, on this 13th of September 2011: 

Louis D. Tambaro, Esq. 

Marks & Klein, LLP 

63 Riverside Avenue 

Red Bank, New Jersey 07701 

Telephone: (732) 747-7100 

Facsimile: (732) 219-0625 

Dated: September 13, 2011 

 __ s/ Dolores F. DiBella__________ 

 Dolores F. DiBella (DD 9637) 

Case 2:11-cv-03849-SDW -MCA Document 10 Filed 09/13/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 64
Case 2:11-cr-00381-JLL Document 27 Filed 11/15/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 439
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In connection with the filing by ADE Corporation (the Company) of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31,
2004 (the Report), the undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Brian C. JamesBrian C. James Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 30, 2013

s0722

Order 

Clerk

July 30, 2013

146543

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146543

COA: 310175

Berrien CC: 2009-015597-FC

2009-015572-FC

ANDRE MAURICE FRANCE, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 27, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 4 0 5 7 2 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,
P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
.
D A M I E N V A R G A S

- P E N A , a l s o k n o w n a s D o m i n g o A l v a r a d o
- C a n t u , a l s o k n o w n a s J o r g e T a r a n
- B e l t r a n ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 2 : 1 0

- C R

- 5 0

- 1

B e f o r e H I G G I N B O T H A M , S M I T H , a n d H A Y N E S , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t D a m i e n V a r g a s
- P e n a h a s m o v e d f

o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s

v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. V a r g a s
- P e n a h a s f i l e d a r e s p o n s e , w h i c h i n c l u d e s a c l a i m t h a t c o u n s e l r e n d e r e d i n e f f e c t i v e a s s i s t a n c e
. T h e r e c o r d i s i n s u f f i c i e n t l y d e v e l o p e d t o a l l o w c o n s i d e r a t i o n a t t h i s t i m e o f V a r g a s
- P e n a ’ s

c l a i m o f i n e f

f e c t i v e a s s i s t a n c e o f c o u n s e l

. S u c h c l a i m s g e n e r a l l y “ c a n n o t b e U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D March 9, 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-40572 Document: 00511404951 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/09/2011N o
. 1 0

- 4 0 5 7 2

r e s o l v e d o n d i r e c t a p p e a l w h e n [ t h e y h a v e ] n o t b e e n r a i s e d b e f o r e t h e d i s t r i c t 1

c o u r t s i n c e n o o p p o r t u n i t y e x i s t e d t o d e v e l o p t h e r e c o r d o n t h e m e r i t s o f t h e

a l l e g a t i o n s
. ” U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. C a n t w e l l , 4 7 0 F

. 3 d 1 0 8 7 , 1 0 9 1 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 0 6 ) ( i n t e r n a l q u o t a t i o n m a r k s a n d c i t a t i o n o m i t t e d )

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e

r e c o r d , c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f , a n d V a r g a s
- P e n a ’ s r e s p o n s e d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D ,

c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S
D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

.

At his fir st ple a coll o q u y h e aring, Vargas -Pen a mad e a pas sin g rem ark about his 1
couns el’s ef

fec tivene ss , but no rec ord w as deve lop ed on this p oint

. 2 Case: 10-40572 Document: 00511404951 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/09/2011
C OUR T OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 7

- 00 137

- CV

Style: In re Terra Energy Partners, LLC, Benjamin “B.J.” Reynolds, Mark

Mewshaw, and Wes Hobbs, Relators

Date motion s filed * : June 6 , 201 7

Type of motion s : Motion f o r Pro Hac Vice Admission of Rachel Cowen with Christina

E. Ponig’s Motion Pursuant to Rule XIX(B) of the Rules Governing

Admission to the Bar of Texas

Part ies filing motion s : Counsel for relators, Terra Energy Partners, LLC, Benjamin “B.J.”

Reynolds, Mark Mewshaw, and Wes Hobbs, Christina E. Ponig

Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? Yes (original proceeding)

.

Ordered that motion s are :

 Granted

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

The motion for pro hac vice admission of Rachel Cowen , filed by the resident attorney,

Christina E. Ponig, and Christina E. Ponig’s motion in support are denied without

prejudice to refiling with the required motion filed by the non

- resident attorney,

Rachel Cowen. See T EX

. R ULES G OVERN

. B AR A DM ’ N XIX( b ) (West 2015) (“The

motion of the non

- resident attorney seeking permission to participate in Texas

p roceedings must be accompanied by motion of the resident practicing Texas attorney

with whom the non

- resident attorney will be associated in the proceeding of a

particular cause.”) (emphasis added)

.

Judge's signature: /s /Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: June 1 3 , 2017
Exhibit 15.1
   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
   We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration  Statements Nos. 333-42000, 333-115003, 333-135435, 333-141307, 333-149825, 333-158839 and 333-166028on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-166046 on Form F-3 of our reports dated March 29, 2011, relating to the financial statements of ClickSoftware Technologies Ltd. (the "Company"), and the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
 
 /s/ Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.
 
 Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.
 Certified Public Accountants
 A Member Firm Of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
 
 Tel Aviv, Israel
 March 29, 2011
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

34. Unemployed jobseekers by sex, reason for unemployment, and active jobsearch methods used

[Numbers in thousands]

Sex and reason

2016

Unemployed Percent of jobseekers using method

Average

number of

methods

used

Total Jobseekers

Contacted

employer

directly

Sent out

resumes

or filled

out

applications

Placed

or

answered

ads

Contacted

friends

or

relatives

Public

employment

agency

Private

employment

agency

Other

Total unemployed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,751 6,785 50.6 57.7 15.4 25.8 15.9 8.0 13.6 1.9

Job losers and persons who completed

temporary jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,740 2,774 53.3 57.6 17.8 29.8 20.7 10.5 14.2 2.0

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 858 52.2 60.3 16.3 23.5 13.0 7.4 13.4 1.9

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,330 2,330 47.6 56.3 13.0 22.8 12.7 6.2 14.1 1.7

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 823 48.5 58.8 13.0 23.0 12.1 4.9 10.1 1.7

Men. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,187 3,625 52.2 55.7 15.0 26.8 16.4 8.4 13.6 1.9

Job losers and persons who completed

temporary jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,232 1,670 55.1 56.1 17.7 30.6 20.1 10.9 14.2 2.1

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414 414 53.2 57.9 15.7 24.4 12.6 7.1 13.2 1.8

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,108 1,108 47.9 53.4 12.2 23.5 13.7 6.5 14.2 1.7

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 433 433 51.1 57.7 11.2 22.6 12.9 5.3 9.8 1.7

Women. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,564 3,160 48.8 60.0 15.8 24.6 15.4 7.4 13.5 1.9

Job losers and persons who completed

temporary jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,508 1,104 50.6 60.0 18.0 28.6 21.7 9.9 14.0 2.0

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 444 444 51.2 62.5 16.8 22.6 13.4 7.7 13.6 1.9

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,222 1,222 47.3 59.0 13.7 22.2 11.8 6.0 14.1 1.7

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 390 390 45.5 60.1 15.0 23.3 11.2 4.4 10.4 1.7

1 Data on the number of jobseekers and the jobsearch methods used exclude persons on temporary layoff.

NOTE: The jobseekers total is less than the total unemployed because it does not include persons on temporary layoff. The percent using each method will always total

more than 100 because many jobseekers use more than one method. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

1