alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
,

v. ORDER

TARGET CORPORATION. et al.,

I)efendants.

A Report and Recommendation was filed on December 2, 2011. recommending that this

Court dismiss this case without prejudice based on Plaintiffs failure to comply with Court

Orders and to prosecute this case. (ECE io. 10). The parties were given notice that they had

fourteen days from receipt thereof to file and serve objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 72(b)(2). No objections having been received, and the Court having reviewed the

Report and Recommendation de novo, and for good cause shown;

It is on this 19th day of December, 2011,

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bongiovanni is

hereby adopted as the opinion of the Court. and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiffs case is i)ISMISSED without prejudice.

d’

PETER G. SHERIDAN, [.S.I).J.

December 19. 2011
**Exhibit 10.27**

 

**FIRST HORIZON PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION**

 

**DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION FOR 2006 SUMMARY SHEET**

 
| **ANNUAL  BOARD RETAINER**                              |   | 2005   |   | $      | 30,000 |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                    |   | 2006   |   | $      | 30,000 |   |
|                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |
| **ANNUAL BOARD CHAIRMANSHIP RETAINER**                  |   | 2005   |   | $      | 10,000 |   |
|                                                    |   | 2006   |   | $      | 10,000 |   |
|                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |
| **ANNUAL COMMITTEE CHAIRMANSHIP RETAINER:**             |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |
| Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee               |   | 2005   |   | $      | 5,000  |   |
|                                                    |   | 2006   |   | $      | 5,000  |   |
|                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |
| Audit Committee                                         |   | 2005   |   | $      | 5,000  |   |
|                                                    |   | 2006   |   | $      | 5,000  |   |
|                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |
| Compensation Committee                                  |   | 2005   |   | $      | 5,000  |   |
|                                                    |   | 2006   |   | $      | 5,000  |   |
|                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |
| Mergers and Acquisition Committee                       |   | 2005   |   | $      | 5,000  |   |
|                                                    |   | 2006   |   | $      | 5,000  |   |
|                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |
| **BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETING FEE (In Person Meeting)** |   | 2005   |   | $      | 1,500  |   |
|                                                    |   | 2006   |   | $      | 1,500  |   |
|                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |
| **BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETING FEE (Telephone Meeting)** |   | 2005   |   | $      | 750    |   |
|                                                    |   | 2006   |   | $      | 750    |   |
|                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |
| **AUDIT COMMITTEE ACCOUNTING EXPERT RETAINER**          |   | 2005   |   | $      | — |   |
|                                                    |   | 2006   |   | $      | 5,000  |   |

 

In 2005, in addition to the base compensation, each director who wasnot an employee and not affiliated with a greater than 10% stockholder wasgranted 5,000 stock options and 2,500 restricted shares

 

----
MICHELE BLACK and ERIN WALSH Civil Action No.: 11-709 (CCC)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER

v.

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH ORANGE, et al.,

Defendants.

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the motion of Defendants City of

Orange and City of Orange Police Department for summary judgment (ECF No. 43), and on the

separate motion of Defendants Township of South Orange and Township of South Orange Police

Departments for summary judgment (ECF No. 44) (the “Defendants”); and the Court deciding the

matter without oral argument pursuant to Rule 78 ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and forthe reasons expressed in the Opinion filed herewith; and for good cause shown,

IT IS on this 2 day of September 2014,

ORDERED that Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 43 and 44) are

GRANTED with respect to Plaintiffs’ federal claims; and it is further

ORDERED that the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’

claims arising under state law pursuant to 28 USC. § 1367(c)(3), and Plaintiffs’ state law claims

are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in order to allow Plaintiffs to re-tile these

claims in a court of competent jurisdiction: and it is further
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of MCA Holdings Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, I, Wai Leung Cheng, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  November 10, 2008 MCA HOLDINGS CORPORATION By:  /s/ Wai Leung Cheng  Wai Leung Cheng  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of MCA Holdings Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, I, Michael Yu-Lung Wong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  November 10, 2008 MCA HOLDINGS CORPORATION By:  /s/ Michael Yu-Long Wong  Michael Yu-Lung Wong
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**344 CA 10-01730** 
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

JOAN HAYMON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF LEONARD HAYMON, AN INFANT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DONALD J. PETTIT, DEFENDANT, AND CITY OF AUBURN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

DAMON MOREY LLP, BUFFALO (STEVEN M. ZWEIG OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

JOHN C. ROSSI, CORPORATION COUNSEL, AUBURN, RIVKIN RADLER LLP, UNIONDALE (CHERYL F. KORMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Mark H. Fandrich, A.J.), entered November 4, 2009 in a personal injury action. The judgment granted summary judgment to defendant City of Auburn and dismissed the amended complaint against that defendant.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action, individually and on behalf of her 14-year-old son, seeking damages for injuries he sustained when he was struck by a vehicle operated by defendant Donald J. Pettit. Plaintiff’s son had been standing with a group of children outside a stadium owned and operated by defendant Auburn Community Non-Profit Baseball Association, Inc. (Baseball Association). There was a baseball game in progress in the stadium, and plaintiff’s son was struck by Pettit’s vehicle while he was running across the street in defendant City of Auburn (City) in an attempt to catch a baseball that was hit out of the stadium. On a prior appeal, we determined that Supreme Court erred in denying the Baseball Association’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against it ( Haymon v Pettit , 37 AD3d 1194, affd 9 NY3d 324, rearg denied 10 NY3d 745), and plaintiff now appeals from a judgment granting the City’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against it. In affirming our order in the prior appeal, the Court of Appeals wrote that “[t]here are inherent risks associated with crossing the street. Those risks are multiplied when doing so indiscriminately . . . We must assume that adults, and children of [the] age [of plaintiff’s son], will act prudently in doing so” ( Haymon , 9 NY3d at 329). The City met its initial burden on the**-2- 344 CA 10-01730** 

motion by establishing that it did not owe a legally recognized duty to plaintiff ( see Gilson v Metropolitan Opera , 5 NY3d 574, 576-577), and plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact to defeat the motion ( see generally Zuckerman v City of New York , 49 NY2d 557, 562).

Entered: March 25, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5234 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5234

 To remediate groundwater contamination caused by perchlorates in the 
                   city of Santa Clarita, California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 2004

  Mr. McKeon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To remediate groundwater contamination caused by perchlorates in the 
                   city of Santa Clarita, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Eastern Santa Clara River Basin 
Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. EASTERN SANTA CLARA RIVER BASIN GROUNDWATER RESTORATION.

    (a) Eastern Santa Clara River Basin.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary of the Army, in cooperation 
        with Federal, State, and local government agencies, shall 
        participate in studies and other investigative activities and 
        in the construction, planning, and design of projects 
        determined by the Secretary to offer a long-term solution to 
        the problem of groundwater contamination caused by perchlorates 
        in the Eastern Santa Clara River Basin, in the city of Santa 
        Clarita, California.
            (2) Sources of perchlorate.--The investigative activities 
        and projects described in paragraph (1) shall include sites 
        that are--
                    (A) sources of perchlorate; and
                    (B) located in the city of Santa Clarita, 
                California.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.

SEC. 3. GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION WITHIN THE SANTA CLARITA VALLEY FOR 
              PERCHLORATE CONTAMINATION.

    Section 219(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 3835; 113 Stat. 335) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(75) Santa clarita, california.--$25,000,00 to remediate 
        groundwater contamination in the Eastern Santa Clara River 
        Basin, Santa Clarita, California. The Secretary shall allow 
        credit for in-kind services provided by the non-Federal sponsor 
        before the initiation of the project, not to exceed the non-
        Federal cost of the project. If the in-kind services provided 
        by the non-Federal sponsor before the initiation of the project 
        exceed the non-Federal cost of the project, the Secretary shall 
        reimburse the non-Federal sponsor for such services.''.
                                 <all>
```
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000032529-JUN-201209:54 AM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CHAMBERS OF

ESTHER SALAS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MARTIN LUTHER KING COURTHOUSE

50 WALNUT ST.

ROOM 2060

NEWARK, NJ 07101

973-297-4887

November 15, 2010

LETTER ORDER

Re: Santiago v. Hudson County, et al.

Civil Action No. 10-3059 (PGS) 

Dear Counsel:

Please be advised that a telephone conference has been scheduled for December 6, 2010 at

4:00 p.m. Plaintiff’s counsel shall initiate the call. Should you have any questions, please call (973)

297-4887.

SO ORDERED.

s/Esther Salas 

Esther Salas, U.S.M.J

Case 3:10-cv-03059-PGS-DEA Document 9 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 114
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying  with 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, the  undersigned
Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Speaking  Roses   International,   Inc.,  a  Utah
corporation (the  "Company"),  hereby certify,  based on my knowledge,  that the
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the three months ended March
31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

 By /s/ Alan K. Farrell
Alan K. Farrell
President and Chief Executive Officer

June 20, 2007



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 11638] 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) declaration for the State of Ohio, dated 01/16/2009. 

*Incident:*                         Category One Hurricane Force Winds.                     

*Incident Period:*                         09/14/2008.                     

*Effective Date:*                         01/16/2009.                     

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         10/16/2009.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. 

The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: 

*Primary Counties:*                     Franklin, Greene, Hamilton, Montgomery.                 

*Contiguous Counties:*

Ohio:  Butler, Clark, Clermont, Clinton, Darke, Delaware, Fairfield, Fayette, Licking, Madison, Miami, Pickaway, Preble, Union, Warren. 

Indiana: Dearborn, Franklin. 

Kentucky: Boone, Campbell, Kenton. 

The Interest Rate is: 4.000. 

The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 116380. 

The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002)

Dated: January 16, 2009. 

 Sandy K. Baruah, 

Acting Administrator.

 [FR Doc. E9-1710 Filed 1-26-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.9




                  Anhui Fuyang Xinte Medical Purchase Contract

                                                                                        Date: 2007-1-05
--------------------------- ---------------- ----------- ------------- --------------- -------------------
Brand name                  description      unit        Unit price    quantity        amount
--------------------------- ---------------- ----------- ------------- --------------- -------------------
<S>                         <C>              <C>         <C>           <C>             <C>


Hepatocyte                  Raw material     Kg          9000          9000            8100000
growth-promoting factor
--------------------------- ---------------- ----------- ------------- --------------- -------------------
Naproxen sodium and         Raw material     Kg          1050          1600            1680000
pesudopherine
hydrochloride
--------------------------- ---------------- ----------- ------------- --------------- -------------------

Ozegrel                     Raw material     Kg          8000          100             4000000
--------------------------- ---------------- ----------- ------------- --------------- -------------------
</TABLE>


1.[ ] Term of quality guarantee:
2.[ ] Way of payment: prepaid.
3.[ ] Way of delivery and fees charged: supplier in charge.
4.[ ] The package is satisfied the standard.
5.[ ] The quality is satisfied the standard, attach the quality inspection
      certificate.
6.[ ] Inspection of goods:
7.[ ] Validity of the contract:
8.[ ] Other arguments: by negotiation
9.[ ] The contract is valid at the time of signature and stamp.






Anhui  Fuyang  Xinte  Pharmaceutical  Company  &  Hainan  Helpson  Medicine  and
Bio-Technology Co., Ltd.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5325 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5325

To amend title 49, United States Code, to establish a deadline for the 
  screening of all individuals, goods, property, vehicles, and other 
equipment entering a secure area of an airport, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2004

  Mrs. Lowey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 49, United States Code, to establish a deadline for the 
  screening of all individuals, goods, property, vehicles, and other 
equipment entering a secure area of an airport, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Guaranteeing Airport Physical 
Screening Standards Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. SCREENING OF ALL INDIVIDUALS AND PROPERTY ENTERING SECURE AREAS 
              OF AN AIRPORT.

    (a) Deadline.--Section 44903(h)(4)(A) of title 49, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``as soon as practicable after the date of 
enactment of this subsection'' and inserting ``not later than 120 days 
after the date of enactment of the Guaranteeing Airport Physical 
Screening Standards Act of 2004''.
    (b) Screening and Inspection Requirements.--Section 44903(h)(4)(B) 
of such title is amended by inserting before the semicolon at the end 
the following: ``and will include at a minimum physical screening for 
metal objects''.
    (c) Interim Measures.--The Secretary shall require random 
screenings and inspections of individuals, goods, property, vehicles, 
and other equipment at the entrances of, and within, secure areas of an 
airport until such date as the Secretary has fully complied with the 
requirements of section 44903(h)(4)(A) of such title. The random 
screenings and inspections shall be conducted in a manner that assures 
the level of protection described in section 44903(h)(4)(B) of such 
title, as amended by this section. The random screenings and 
inspections shall be unannounced and shall be conducted 24 hours a day.

SEC. 3. HIRING OF SCREENERS.

    (a) Number of Screeners.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, the Secretary of Homeland Security may hire the number of 
passenger and baggage screeners that the Secretary determines necessary 
to ensure aviation security.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```
exhibit4-1.htm


Exhibit 4.1


 





 




  





Page - 1











  






 





 




  





Page - 2











  






 





 




  





Page - 3











  






 





 




  





Page - 4











  






 





 




  





Page - 5











  






 





 




  





Page - 6











  






 





 




  





Page - 7











  






 





 




  





Page - 8











  






 





 




  





Page - 9