alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Penn Virginia GP Holdings, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank A. Pici, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PVG GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 6, 2009



/s/    Frank A. PiciFrank A. PiciVice President and Chief Financial Officer


This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# Labor force research series

https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpspopsm.pdf
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00378

- CR

Pablo Garcia

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 4

o f Tarrant County (1219701D )

November 7, 2013

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_________________________________ Justice Lee Gabriel
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 17 Filed 09/14/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 166
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 17 Filed 09/14/10 Page 2 of 6 PageID: 167
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 17 Filed 09/14/10 Page 3 of 6 PageID: 168
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 17 Filed 09/14/10 Page 4 of 6 PageID: 169
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 17 Filed 09/14/10 Page 5 of 6 PageID: 170
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 17 Filed 09/14/10 Page 6 of 6 PageID: 171
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying  Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Grace 6,
Inc. (the  "Company") for the quarter  ending  February 28, 2007, I, Virginia K.
Sourlis,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company
hereby  certify  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

      1. Such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ending  February
28, 2007,  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information  contained in such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ending February 28, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 21, 2007
Grace 6, Inc.
By: /s/ Virginia K. Sourlis
    -----------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:11-cr-00372-MCA Document 13 Filed 06/22/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 30
Case 2:11-cr-00372-MCA Document 13 Filed 06/22/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 31
Case 2:11-cr-00372-MCA Document 13 Filed 06/22/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 32
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Piedmont Mining Company, Inc. (the
        “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
        undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
  1. The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 Date:
                    May 16, 2007By:
                /s/
                    Robert M. Shields,
                    Jr.Name:
                    Robert M. Shields, Jr.Title:
                    Chief Executive Officer
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
        appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to Piedmont Mining Company, Inc. and will
        be
        retained by Piedmont Mining Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT

F

Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH-PS Document 1-6 Filed 08/02/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 67
FNA0000049

Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH-PS Document 1-6 Filed 08/02/11 Page 2 of 9 PageID: 68
FNA0000050

Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH-PS Document 1-6 Filed 08/02/11 Page 3 of 9 PageID: 69
FNA0000051

Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH-PS Document 1-6 Filed 08/02/11 Page 4 of 9 PageID: 70
FNA0000052

Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH-PS Document 1-6 Filed 08/02/11 Page 5 of 9 PageID: 71
FNA0000053

Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH-PS Document 1-6 Filed 08/02/11 Page 6 of 9 PageID: 72
FNA0000054

Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH-PS Document 1-6 Filed 08/02/11 Page 7 of 9 PageID: 73
FNA0000055

Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH-PS Document 1-6 Filed 08/02/11 Page 8 of 9 PageID: 74
FNA0000056

Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH-PS Document 1-6 Filed 08/02/11 Page 9 of 9 PageID: 75
Exhibit 23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements(Form S-8 No. 333-116612, Form S-8 No. 333-125777, Form S-8 No. 333-135995, and Form S-8 No. 333-132797)pertaining to the Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan of Blackboard Inc., in the RegistrationStatement on Form S-3 No. 333-143715 and in the related Prospectus pertaining to the Convertible SeniorNotes due 2027, and in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 No. 333-148975 and in the related Prospectuspertaining to the registration and sale by selling shareholders of 1,972,596 shares of common stock, ofour reports dated February 19, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of BlackboardInc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Blackboard Inc., included inthis Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.
 /s/ Ernst &Young LLPMcLean, Virginia
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

____________________________________

PATRICK COLLINS :

Plaintiff : Civil Action No. 11-4203 (FSH)

v. :

JOHN DOES 1-13, :

 

Defendant :

____________________________________:

K-BEECH, INC., :

Plaintiff : Civil Action No. 11-4776 (FSH)

v. :

JOHN DOES 1-39, :

Defendant :

____________________________________:

ORDER ON INFORMAL APPLICATION

This matter having come before the Court by way of motion of plaintiff’s counsel to

withdraw and to adjourn all deadlines by thirty days;

and the Court having determined that an expedited in-person hearing with all counsel, pro

se defendants, and a representative of the plaintiffs shall be convened so as to not unduly and

prejudicially delay these proceedings;

and the Court reminding the movant that counsel is responsible for handling this matter

unless and until the motion is granted;

Case 2:11-cv-04203-FSH-PS Document 43 Filed 02/24/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 406
IT IS THEREFORE on this 24 day of February, 2012 th

ORDERED that any response to the motion to withdraw shall be submitted no later than

March 2, 2011 at noon;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there shall be an in-person hearing before the

Undersigned on March 5, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. to address the motion of plaintiff’s counsel to

withdraw. This date supercedes any automatic entries on the docket concerning the application. 

Trial counsel for all parties and the plaintiff are required to appear in person at the hearing. If the

plaintiff fails to appear, its absence shall be deemed consent to the motion and a decision to

abandon this case and the Undersigned will recommend to the United States District Judge that

the Complaint be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff’s counsel shall serve a copy of this Order

upon the plaintiff by regular mail, certified or overnight mail/return receipt requested, and fax

and/or email if available and file a certificate of service with the Clerk; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request for a thirty-day extension of the deadlines is

denied and all deadlines remain in full force and effect.

s/Patty Shwartz 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:11-cv-04203-FSH-PS Document 43 Filed 02/24/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 407
1996 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

11-20-1996

Antol v. Exposto

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 95-3714

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1996

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1996 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Antol v. Exposto" (1996). 1996 Decisions. Paper 31.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1996/31
 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 ____________ 

 No. 95-3714 

 ____________ 

 GARY L. ANTOL, et al., 

 Appellants 

 v. 

 DOMINIC ESPOSTO, et al., 

 Appellees 

 ____________ 

 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 (D. C. No. 95-cv-00951) 

 ____________ 

 Argued August 6, 1996 

 Before: MANSMANN, SCIRICA, and WEIS, Circuit Judges 

 Filed November 20, 1996 

 ____________ 

 ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION 

 It is hereby ordered that the following footnote 4 will replace 

the existing footnote 4 appearing on page 18 of the slip opinion in this 

case. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/Joseph F. Weis 

 ___________________________ 

 Joseph F. Weis 

 United States Circuit Judge

Date: January 10, 1997
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21E0028. IN THE INTEREST OF BABY GIRL N. (A CHILD).

The Appellant in the above-styled case has filed an emergency motion,

pursuant to Court Rule 40(b), entitled Emergency Motion For Extension Of Time To

File Application For Discretionary Appeal. Appellant received a previous extension

to file the discretionary application on December 9, 2020. Pursuant to OCGA §

5-6-39(a)(5), (c), said motion is hereby DENIED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

January 22, 2021

01/22/2021
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, the undersigned, Jay C. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer, of Forgent Networks, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:



| | 1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended April 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ JAY C. PETERSONJay C. PetersonChief Financial OfficerJune 14, 2005
Case 2:11-cr-00080-SDW Document 171 Filed 02/28/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 568
Case 2:11-cr-00080-SDW Document 171 Filed 02/28/12 Page 2 of 6 PageID: 569
Case 2:11-cr-00080-SDW Document 171 Filed 02/28/12 Page 3 of 6 PageID: 570
Case 2:11-cr-00080-SDW Document 171 Filed 02/28/12 Page 4 of 6 PageID: 571
Case 2:11-cr-00080-SDW Document 171 Filed 02/28/12 Page 5 of 6 PageID: 572
Case 2:11-cr-00080-SDW Document 171 Filed 02/28/12 Page 6 of 6 PageID: 573
EXHIBIT 32.2

            CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Scherne, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of Dentalserv.com  on Form 10-
QSB, for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-QSB
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of Dentalserv.com


                                 /S/  Robert Scherne
                                 ---------------------------
                                 Robert Scherne
                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                 Dentalserv.com

May 14, 2007








<PAGE>
Exhibit 77.B

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

                               (LOGO)
**Exhibit      21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES      OF DEBT RESOLVE, INC.**

| Subsidiary                                                                    |   | Owner                                          |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                          |   |                                           |
| DRV                  Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company        |   | Debt                  Resolve, Inc.            |
|                                                                          |   |                                           |
| EAR                  Capital I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company     |   | DRV                  Capital LLC.              |
|                                                                          |   |                                           |
| First                  Performance Corporation, a Nevada corporation          |   | Debt                  Resolve, Inc.            |
|                                                                          |   |                                           |
| First                  Performance Recovery Corporation, a Nevada corporation |   | First                  Performance Corporation |

----
#### CORIELL et al. v. COSMOPOLITAN TOURIST CO., Inc.

Civ. A. No. 10940.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

July 31, 1950.

*443Carlton Adams Walls, New York City, for plaintiffs.

David Tepp, White Plains, N. Y., for defendant.

INCH, Chief Judge.

The affidavit of the attorney for plaintiffs is not sworn to, but it sufficiently sets forth the general situation. From this it appears that the plaintiffs claim to have been injured in a collision between a car in which they were riding and a bus owned by the defendant. The action was first brought in the State Court. Apparently plaintiffs decided to discontinue the State Court action and commence the present suit in this Federal Court. However, the only steps toward taking such discontinuance was a stipulation to do so signed by plaintiffs and sent to counsel for defendant, but not signed and returned by him. No further steps to discontinue were thereupon taken. I need not discuss the question of the State Court order for security for costs as that is a matter for the State Court.

 It seems to me, however, that the plaintiffs should complete the discontinuance of their State Court action in view of the above before seeking production and inspection of documents in this action. In order to avoid delay, and in accordance with the Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, 28 U.S.C.A., I will dispose of the motion as follows: Provided the plaintiffs complete discontinuance of the action in the State Court and submit to the examination requested by defendant, the defendant is required to produce and permit plaintiffs’ counsel to inspect and copy any written statements made by Motto, Bliebtrey, Cooper, Rossi, Mildred Coriell and Det-jen, and the medical report as to plaintiff, Mildred Coriell, made by defendant’s physician, and plaintiff is entitled to the names and addresses of any eye-witnesses to the accident in the possession of the defendant.

As to the examination of the co-plaintiff, Mildren Coriell, it is claimed that she is mentally ill, and not available for examination. If this circumstance exists, her examination would naturally have to be postponed, but formal application showing good ground therefor would have to be made.

Motion granted accordingly. Settle order on notice.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Arnulfo Garza CANTU, also known as Arnulfo Garza, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-20697

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 2012.

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Cheryl Harris Diggs, Diggs Law Firm, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Arnulfo Garza Cantu has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Garza Cantu has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the rec*332ord reflected therein, as well as Garza Cantu’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5363 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5363

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize salary adjustments for Justices and judges of the United 
                      States for fiscal year 2005.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5363

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize salary adjustments for Justices and judges of the United 
                      States for fiscal year 2005.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR FEDERAL JUSTICES AND 
              JUDGES.

    Pursuant to section 140 of Public Law 97-92, Justices and judges of 
the United States are authorized during fiscal year 2005 to receive a 
salary adjustment in accordance with section 461 of title 28, United 
States Code.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Case 2:11-cv-00678-SDW-MCA Document 11 Filed 03/09/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 98
Case 2:11-cv-00678-SDW-MCA Document 11 Filed 03/09/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 99
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 
 2013 Annual Base Salaries 
  

									
	 Executive Officer
	  	Prior Base Salary	 	  	2013 Base Salary	 
	 Douglas C. Bryant

President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	496,501	  	  	$	511,396	  
	 Robert J. Bujarski

Senior Vice President, Business Development and General Counsel
	  	$	320,816	  	  	$	330,440	  
	 Mark Smits

Senior Vice President, Commercial Operations, North America
	  	$	290,700	  	  	$	310,000	  
	 Timothy T. Stenzel

Chief Scientific Officer
	  	$	308,404	  	  	$	315,000	  
	 Randall Steward

Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	303,000	  	  	$	315,000	  
	 John D. Tamerius

Senior Vice President, Clinical and Regulatory Affairs
	  	$	290,178	  	  	$	298,883
CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








The
      Board
      of Directors


World
      Am,
      Inc.





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by
      reference in the previously
      filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-109358 and 333-130882)
      of our report dated March 20, 2007, appearing in the Annual Report on Form
      10-KSB of World Am, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.





/s/ KMJ Corbin & Company, LLPKMJ
              Corbin & Company, LLPIrvine,
                California
              April
                1, 2007
Chart 6-5. In 2005, working wives contributed a little more 

than a third of their families’ income

23

25

27

29

31

33

35

37

1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003

23

25

27

29

31

33

35

37

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Percent

Chart 6-5. In 2005, working wives contributed a little more 

than a third of their families’ income

• As more wives have entered higher-paying occupations and more wives work 

full time all year, their contribution to family income has increased. By 2005, 

35 cents of every dollar of married-couple family income were earned by the 

wife.

• Among married-couple families where both the wife and husband have 

earnings, 26 percent of wives earned more than their husbands in 2005. This 

was up from 18 percent in 1987.