alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

34. Unemployed jobseekers by sex, reason for unemployment, and active jobsearch methods used

[Numbers in thousands]

Sex and reason

2013

Unemployed Percent of jobseekers using method

Average

number of

methods

used

Total Jobseekers

Contacted

employer

directly

Sent out

resumes

or filled

out

applications

Placed

or

answered

ads

Contacted

friends

or

relatives

Public

employment

agency

Private

employment

agency

Other

Total unemployed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,460 10,324 51.1 57.3 17.2 28.8 19.4 8.9 15.2 2.0

Job losers and persons who completed

temporary jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,073 4,937 53.5 57.3 19.5 32.7 24.0 11.2 16.2 2.2

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 932 51.5 60.7 16.9 25.7 17.2 7.9 14.3 2.0

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,207 3,207 48.4 56.5 15.3 25.4 15.9 7.0 15.2 1.8

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,247 1,247 48.7 56.9 13.3 25.0 11.9 5.2 11.8 1.7

Men. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,314 5,588 52.4 55.3 17.1 30.2 20.0 9.3 15.5 2.0

Job losers and persons who completed

temporary jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,690 2,964 54.5 55.5 19.0 33.4 23.6 11.1 16.4 2.1

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 465 465 51.9 59.2 17.4 27.7 19.0 8.6 14.2 2.0

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,491 1,491 49.7 53.1 15.5 26.9 16.8 7.5 16.0 1.9

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 668 668 49.6 56.6 12.3 25.1 12.0 5.8 11.5 1.7

Women. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,146 4,736 49.6 59.7 17.3 27.3 18.7 8.4 14.8 2.0

Job losers and persons who completed

temporary jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,383 1,974 51.9 60.0 20.1 31.6 24.6 11.5 15.9 2.2

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 467 467 51.1 62.1 16.5 23.7 15.4 7.3 14.4 1.9

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,716 1,716 47.3 59.5 15.2 24.1 15.0 6.5 14.5 1.8

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 579 579 47.7 57.3 14.3 25.0 11.8 4.5 12.0 1.7

1 Data on the number of jobseekers and the jobsearch methods used exclude persons on temporary layoff.

NOTE: The jobseekers total is less than the total unemployed because it does not include persons on temporary layoff. The percent using each method will always total

more than 100 because many jobseekers use more than one method. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

1
Exhibit 4.32
   Hoshin GigaMedia Center Inc.
   
  Koos Broadband Telecom Company Limited




---



##### 



TRANSITIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT
 Agreement
 Party A
 Ko Ying KBT Ko Ying Party B
  RECITALS
 WHEREAS CNS Share Purchase Agreement
 WHEREAS Asset Purchase Agreement
 WHEREAS




---



##### 



AGREEMENT
  
 General Interpretation
     
 Transitional Services
 Transitional Services
  Lease Agreement
 t Cooperation Agreement




---



##### 



Technical Support by Party B
 
  Waiver for PPPOE Patent
 
 ARTICLE III
SERVICE CHARGES
 Service Charges




---



##### 



t t
   Payment
   
 Access to Information




---



##### 



Duties; Disclaimer
  
 Termination
       Effect of Termination




---



##### 



Amendment and Modification
  Waiver
  Notices




---



##### 



No Third-Party Beneficiaries
  Governing Law
  Dispute Resolution
  Assignment; Successors
  Severability




---



##### 



Counterparts
  No Presumption Against Drafting Party




---



##### 



Hoshin GigaMedia Center Inc.Name:Title:Name:Title:Koos Broadband Telecom Company LimitedName:Title:




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



#####
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Matritech, Inc. (the registrant):2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be
designed under our
supervision, to ensure that
material information relating
to the registrant, including
its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those
entities, particularly during
the period in which this
report is being prepared;b.
    
    [Paragraph omitted in
accordance with SEC
transition instructions
contained in SEC Release
33-8238 and 34-47986.]c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness
of the registrants
disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this
report based on such
evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrants
internal control over
financial reporting that
occurred during the
registrants third fiscal
quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal
control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of
internal controls over
financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to
adversely affect the
registrants ability to
record, process, summarize
and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves
management or other employees
who have a significant role
in the registrants internal
controls over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Richard A. SandbergRichard A. SandbergChief Financial Officer
Case 2:11-cv-03614-FSH-PS Document 1-3 Filed 06/20/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 17
Case 2:11-cv-03614-FSH-PS Document 1-3 Filed 06/20/11 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 18
Case 2:11-cv-03614-FSH-PS Document 1-3 Filed 06/20/11 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 19
Case 2:11-cv-03614-FSH-PS Document 1-3 Filed 06/20/11 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 20
Case 2:11-cv-03614-FSH-PS Document 1-3 Filed 06/20/11 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 21
Case 3:11-cv-04275-JAP-DEA Document 53 Filed 10/15/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 314
Case 3:11-cv-04275-JAP-DEA Document 53 Filed 10/15/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 315
[No. 31163-1-II.

Division Two.

October 18, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Vernon Gene Scadding, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 03-1-01346-1, Stephen M. Warning, J., entered December 18, 2003. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Van Deren, A.C.J., and Houghton, J.
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 01-4295



#  N ELSON P EREZ , a/k/a Pop, a/k/a Eric Epps, Defendant-Appellant. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge.

(CR-94-41) Submitted: September 13, 2001 Decided: September 25, 2001 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Edward H. Childress, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Ruth Plagenhoef, United States Attorney, Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM: Nelson Perez appeals the twenty-four-month prison sentence the district court imposed after revoking his supervised release. Perez asserts that the sentence was plainly unreasonable because it exceeded the eight-to-fourteen month sentence suggested under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

§ 7B1.4, p.s. (2000). Perez also claims that the court failed to consider the availability of a substance abuse treatment program and other factors in 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 1985 & Supp. 2001) before imposing sentence. We affirm. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the districtcourt did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Perez to a twenty-fourmonth term of imprisonment. See United States v. Davis , 53 F.3d 638, 642 (4th Cir. 1995) (providing standard of review). We also find that the district court properly considered the factors set forth in § 3553(a). Id. ("A court need not engage in ritualistic incantation in order to establish its consideration of a legal issue. It is sufficient if . . . thedistrict court rules on issues that have been fully presented for determination. Consideration is implicit in the court’s ultimate ruling."). Accordingly, we affirm Perez’s sentence. We dispense with oralargument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. P EREZ
# 2007

# 2008

# 2009

# 2010
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

28. Unemployed persons by reason for unemployment, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity

(Numbers in thousands)

Reason

White Black or African

American Asian Hispanic or Latinoethnicity

2003 2004 2003 2004 2003 2004 2003 2004

NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYED

 Total unemployed .................................................................. 6,311 5,847 1,787 1,729 366 277 1,441 1,342

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs .......... 3,613 3,105 876 828 195 139 807 693

 On temporary layoff ................................................................ 924 819 138 129 27 19 224 200

 Not on temporary layoff .......................................................... 2,689 2,286 738 699 169 120 583 493

 Permanent job losers ............................................................ 2,085 1,744 530 484 144 95 393 321

 Persons who completed temporary jobs .............................. 604 542 208 215 25 24 190 172

Job leavers ............................................................................... 619 654 132 142 37 28 103 121

Reentrants ................................................................................ 1,676 1,638 614 590 88 73 398 377

New entrants ............................................................................ 403 450 165 169 46 37 133 152

PERCENT DISTRIBUTION

 Total unemployed .................................................................. 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

 Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs ......... 57.3 53.1 49.0 47.9 53.4 50.2 56.0 51.6

 On temporary layoff ............................................................... 14.6 14.0 7.7 7.5 7.2 7.0 15.6 14.9

 Not on temporary layoff ......................................................... 42.6 39.1 41.3 40.4 46.1 43.2 40.5 36.7

 Job leavers .............................................................................. 9.8 11.2 7.4 8.2 10.1 10.2 7.1 9.0

 Reentrants ............................................................................... 26.6 28.0 34.4 34.1 23.9 26.2 27.6 28.1

 New entrants ........................................................................... 6.4 7.7 9.2 9.8 12.6 13.4 9.2 11.3

UNEMPLOYED AS A PERCENT OF THE

 CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE

 Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs ......... 3.0 2.6 5.3 5.0 3.2 2.2 4.3 3.6

 Job leavers .............................................................................. .5 .5 .8 .9 .6 .4 .5 .6

 Reentrants ............................................................................... 1.4 1.4 3.7 3.5 1.4 1.2 2.1 2.0

 New entrants ........................................................................... .3 .4 1.0 1.0 .8 .6 .7 .8

 NOTE: Estimates for the above race groups (white, black or African American, and Asian) do not sum to totals because data are not presented for all races. In

addition, persons whose ethnicity is identified as Hispanic or Latino may be of any race and, therefore, are classified by ethnicity as well as by race. Beginning in

January 2004, data reflect revised population controls used in the household survey.

240
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Alpha ProTech, Ltd on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Sheldon Hoffman Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to10 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| DATE:      | **   May 14, 2008** | ** ** | BY:                                                                                  |    /s/**Sheldon  Hoffman** |
|------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| ** ** |                                    |       |                                                                                 |
| ** ** |                                    |       |         Sheldon Hoffman                      |
|       |                                    |       |         Chief Executive Officer and Director |

 

----
Case 2:11-cr-00459-SDW Document 12 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 25
Case 2:11-cr-00459-SDW Document 12 Filed 10/28/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 26
Case 2:11-cr-00459-SDW Document 12 Filed 10/28/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 27
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 574

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat gold, silver, and 

platinum, in either coin or bar form, in the same manner as stocks 

and bonds for purposes of the maximum capital gains rate for individuals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2003

Mr. HAYWORTH (for himself and Mr. GIBBONS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat gold, 

silver, and platinum, in either coin or bar form, in the 

same manner as stocks and bonds for purposes of the 

maximum capital gains rate for individuals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GOLD, SILVER, AND PLATINUM TREATED IN 

4 THE SAME MANNER AS STOCKS AND BONDS 

5 FOR MAXIMUM CAPITAL GAINS RATE FOR IN6 DIVIDUALS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

8 1(h)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 
2

•HR 574 IH 

1 to definition of collectibles gain and loss) is amended by 

2 striking ‘‘without regard to paragraph (3) thereof’’ and 

3 inserting ‘‘without regard to so much of paragraph (3) 

4 thereof as relates to palladium and the bullion requirement 

5 for physical possession by a trustee’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

8 December 31, 2002.

Æ
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT 

ELIZABETH A. BRO 

BY: 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

EDGAR MARTINEZ, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

ANN GUTIERREZ, 

Respondent. 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

No. 83228 

FILED( 

SEP 2021 

EuzABE-i A. anowN 

CLE F REME COUR"— 

BY DEPUTY CLERK 

Cause appearing, appellant's motion for a voluntary dismissal 

of this appeal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. NRAP 42(b). 

It is so ORDERED. 

cc: Hon. Aimee Banales, District Judge 

M.J. Caffaratti Law, LLC 

Ann Gutierrez 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER 

), [947 .ePTE)•. - Z,6 31.7-
[No. 51905-1-I.

Division One.

November 21, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Nazario Santiago-Perez, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Skagit County, No. 02-1-00571-2, Susan K. Cook, J., entered February 20, 2003. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Executive, 

administrative, 

and managerial

Professional 

specialty

Technicians and 

related support

Sales 

occupations

Administrative 

support, including 

clerical

Service 

occupations

Precision 

production, craft

and repair

Total for occupation (in thousands)............ 20,345 21,685 4,498 16,308 18,604 18,796 14,969 

Percent................................................... 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 

Management, business, and financial operations occupations............................ 73.1 3.6 1.5 7.7 5.0 0.9 3.3 

Professional and related occupations............ 4.1 91.8 79.2 1.1 7.1 3.6 3.0 Service occupations.................................... 4.0 2.0 8.5 1.6 1.8 91.3 1.9 Sales and related occupations..................... 4.4 0.5 0.4 83.6 2.5 0.9 1.4 

Office and administrative support occupations........................................... 11.1 1.3 2.1 4.2 81.6 1.1 1.3 

Farming, fishing, and forestry occupations...... 0.1 [ 1 ] 0.1 0.1 [ 1 ] 0.1 0.1 Construction and extraction occupations......... 1.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 38.9 

Installation, maintenance, and repair occupations........................................... 0.4 0.2 2.1 0.3 0.2 0.4 27.1 

Production occupations.............................. 1.1 0.5 2.1 0.7 0.9 0.8 21.7 

Transportation and material moving occupations........................................... 0.6 0.1 3.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 1.3 

1Value less than 0.05

NOTE: Estimates are based on three-year average employment (2000-2002).SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey.

Table 1. Distribution of employment from the 1990 to the 2002 Census Occupational Classification by major occupational group

(Percent distribution)

2002 Occupational Group

1990 Occupational Group
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 17 (Wednesday, January 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1747]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

Date and Time:  Thursday, January 29, 2009, at 10 a.m.

Place:  999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

Status:  This meeting will be open to the public.

Items to be Discussed: Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2008-20: National Right to Life Committee, 
Inc., by James Bopp, Jr., Esquire.
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2008-22: Senator Frank Lautenberg and 
Lautenberg for Senate, by Marc E. Elias, Esquire.
    Report of the Audit Division on the Missouri Democratic State 
Committee.
    Explanation and Justification for Final Rules on Reporting 
Contributions Bundled by Lobbyists, Registrants, and the PACs of 
Lobbyists and Registrants.
    Management and Administrative Matters.
    Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such 
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact Mary Dove, Commission Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at 
least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

Person to Contact for Information:  Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E9-1747 Filed 1-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-74,574-02

IN RE TIMOTHY JOHNSON, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. R114-2867-06 IN THE 114 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM SMITH COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus under this

Court’s original jurisdiction. He contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in

Smith County and his application has not been properly forwarded to this Court.

Respondent, the District Clerk of Smith County, shall forward Relator’s habeas application

to this Court, respond that Relator has not filed a habeas application in Smith County, or forward a

copy of an order designating issues together with correspondence documenting the date the State

received Relator’s habeas application. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(c) and (d); TEX.

R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(5). This motion for leave to file will be held. Respondent shall comply with this

order within thirty days from the date of this order.

Filed: January 11, 2023

Do not publish
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Subjex Corporation does hereby certifythat:





(a) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/Aof Subjex
Corporation for the yearendedDecember 31, 2007(the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects,the financial
conditionand results of operations of
Subjex Corporation








Date:
      August 12, 2008
            By:
            /s/  Andrew
      D. HyderAndrewD.HyderPresident& Chief Executive
    Officer
# cpsaat40
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd.**

 

Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Alpha ProTech, Ltd on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Sheldon Hoffman Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to10 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| DATE:  | **May 6, 2009** |   | BY:    | /s/  **Sheldon Hoffman**             |
|--------|----------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |                 |   |   |                                 |
|   |                 |   |   | Sheldon Hoffman                      |
|   |                 |   |   | Chief Executive Officer and Director |

 

----