alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Robert DeSanto, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

Cardworks Servicing, LLC; and DOES 1-10, 

inclusive, 

 Defendant. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action No.: 3:11-cv-04300-FLW -TJB

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT AND VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)

 Robert DeSanto (“Plaintiff”), by Plaintiff’s attorney, hereby withdraws the complaint and 

voluntarily dismisses this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). 

Dated: September 12, 2011 

 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 By: /s/ Sofia Balile 

 

Sofia Balile, Esq. 

Lemberg & Associates LLC 

1100 Summer Street 

Stamford, CT 06905 

Phone: (917) 981-0849 

Facsimile: (203) 653-3424 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 

 

Case 3:11-cv-04300-FLW-TJB Document 3 Filed 09/12/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 11
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on September 12, 2011, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

Notice of Withdrawal was served electronically by the U.S. District Court for the District of New 

Jersey Electronic Document Filing System (ECF) and that the document is available on the ECF 

system. 

 By_/s/ Sofia Balile_______ 

 Sofia Balile 

Case 3:11-cv-04300-FLW-TJB Document 3 Filed 09/12/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 12
#### KANE v. SESAC, Inc. (BREGOFF et al., Third Party Defendants).

District Court, S. D. New York.

Oct. 2, 1942.

Harry Weinberger, of New York City, for plaintiff Thos. Kane.

I. Bregoff, of New York City, in pro per.

COXE, District Judge.

The defendant Bregoff has in his answer set up a counterclaim against the plaintiff for $25,000. This counterclaim is asserted only against the plaintiff, and is not involved in the bankruptcy proceedings; it would in no way be affected by a stay or dismissal of the main action. I think, therefore, that the defendant Bregoff is subject to examination with respect to the counterclaim. The notice to produce is, however, objectionable. If the purpose is to inspect designated documents, etc., Rule 34, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, should be followed; otherwise a subpoena should be obtained under Rule 45.

The motion is denied insofar as it seeks to stay the examination or vacate the notice for the deposition; it is granted as to the notice to produce, without prejudice to proceeding as above indicated.
Case 2:11-cv-00897-JLL-MAH Document 18 Filed 09/08/11 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 542
Case 2:11-cv-00897-JLL-MAH Document 18 Filed 09/08/11 Page 2 of 15 PageID: 543
Case 2:11-cv-00897-JLL-MAH Document 18 Filed 09/08/11 Page 3 of 15 PageID: 544
Case 2:11-cv-00897-JLL-MAH Document 18 Filed 09/08/11 Page 4 of 15 PageID: 545
Case 2:11-cv-00897-JLL-MAH Document 18 Filed 09/08/11 Page 5 of 15 PageID: 546
Case 2:11-cv-00897-JLL-MAH Document 18 Filed 09/08/11 Page 6 of 15 PageID: 547
Case 2:11-cv-00897-JLL-MAH Document 18 Filed 09/08/11 Page 7 of 15 PageID: 548
Case 2:11-cv-00897-JLL-MAH Document 18 Filed 09/08/11 Page 8 of 15 PageID: 549
Case 2:11-cv-00897-JLL-MAH Document 18 Filed 09/08/11 Page 9 of 15 PageID: 550
Case 2:11-cv-00897-JLL-MAH Document 18 Filed 09/08/11 Page 10 of 15 PageID: 551
Case 2:11-cv-00897-JLL-MAH Document 18 Filed 09/08/11 Page 11 of 15 PageID: 552
Case 2:11-cv-00897-JLL-MAH Document 18 Filed 09/08/11 Page 12 of 15 PageID: 553
Case 2:11-cv-00897-JLL-MAH Document 18 Filed 09/08/11 Page 13 of 15 PageID: 554
Case 2:11-cv-00897-JLL-MAH Document 18 Filed 09/08/11 Page 14 of 15 PageID: 555
Case 2:11-cv-00897-JLL-MAH Document 18 Filed 09/08/11 Page 15 of 15 PageID: 556
UNITED STATESSECURITY AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RICHARD and JANET BROOKE, : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiffs, : NO. 11-2418

 :

v. :

:

J&J PAINTING, et al., :

:

Defendants. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 31 day of May, 2011, upon consideration of Defendant Shree st

Ganeshai, Inc’s Motion to Transfer Venue (Dkt. No. 2), and Plaintiffs’ Opposition thereto (Dkt.

No. 4), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED

as follows:

1. Said Motion is GRANTED; 

2. The matter is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the District

of New Jersey; and

3. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case as CLOSED for statistical purposes in the

Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ C. Darnell Jones, II

 

C. DARNELL JONES, II J.

Case 3:11-cv-03862-MLC-TJB Document 7 Filed 05/31/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 100
Case 2:11-mj-08131-MCA Document 13 Filed 02/09/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 26
Case 2:11-mj-08131-MCA Document 13 Filed 02/09/12 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 27
Case 2:11-mj-08131-MCA Document 13 Filed 02/09/12 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 28
Case 2:11-mj-08131-MCA Document 13 Filed 02/09/12 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 29
Case 2:11-mj-08131-MCA Document 13 Filed 02/09/12 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 30
Exhibit 23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos.333-102351, 333-112220, 333-109872, 333-109873, 333-127521, 333-145311, and 333-141388) of DendreonCorporation and in the related Prospectuses and to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-39634, 333-107551, 333-85032, and 333-143251) pertainingto the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the 2002Broad Based Equity Incentive Plan of our reports dated March 11, 2008 with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of Dendreon Corporation and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting of Dendreon Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for theyear ended December 31, 2007./s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPSeattle, Washington
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: December 17, 2010
    /s/ Brendan J. McGillBrendan J. McGillExecutive Vice President and
Chief Operating and Financial Officer
Case 1:11-cv-02578-RMB-KMW   Document 47   Filed 03/27/12   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 258

Case 1:11-cv-02578-RMB-KMW   Document 47   Filed 03/27/12   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 259
|                  |   |                                  |   |
|-----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: August 12, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Dann H. Bowman                    |   |
|                  |   | Dann H. Bowman                        |   |
|                  |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

|   |   |                                              |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | By:    | /s/ Sandra F. Pender                              |   |
|   |   | Sandra F. Pender                                  |   |
|   |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |   |                                              |   |

----
THE MCDANIEL LAW FIRM, PC 

54 Main Street 

Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 

(201) 845-3232 

(201) 845-3777 - facsimile 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Baseprotect UG, Ltd. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

BASEPROTECT UG, LTD., a German 

Corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

JOHN DOES 1-X (such persons being 

presently unknown), 

 Defendants. 

 

Civ. Action. No. 2:11-cv-03621(CCC)(JAD) 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

AS TO IP ADDRESS 66.30.90.201 ONLY

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Plaintiff BASEPROTECT UG, LTD., by its undersigned attorney, hereby voluntarily 

dismisses, without prejudice, the above-captioned matter pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) as 

to the defendant identified by Internet Protocol address 66.30.90.201 ONLY. No answer or 

motion for summary judgment has been served in this action by this defendant. 

DATED: April 1, 2012 THE MCDANIEL LAW FIRM, P.C. 

 By: 

 Jay R. McDaniel, Esq. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Baseprotect UG, Ltd.

DATED: 

 _________________________________________ 

 Hon. Joseph A. Dickson, U.S.M.J. 

Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC-JAD Document 158 Filed 04/01/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1188
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Baoshinn Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, I, Tong Ricky Chiu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  August 10, 2007 Baoshinn Corporation By: /s/ Tong Ricky Chiu Tong Ricky Chiu  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Baoshinn Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, I, Pan Hung Benny Kan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  August 10, 2007 Baoshinn Corporation By: /s/ Pan Hung Benny Kan Pan Hung Benny Kan
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2233

GREGORY W. SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA;

DAVID SANDERS, Judge; N. EDWARD EAGLOSKI;

ORVILLE CONNER SPAULDING, “Hobby”, Judge,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 03-2243

GREGORY W. SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA;

DAVID SANDERS, Judge of the Berkeley Circuit

Court,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

No. 03-2244

GREGORY W. SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA;

N. EDWARD EAGLOSKI, Judge of the Putnam County

Circuit Court,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Elizabeth V. Hallanan,

Senior District Judge. (CA-03-171-2, CA-03-138-2, CA-03-148-2)

Submitted: December 11, 2003 Decided: December 19, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory W. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Gregory W. Smith appeals the

district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge to dismiss the petitions for writs of mandamus as

frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and

dismiss the appeals as frivolous. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

21. Persons at work in nonagricultural industries by class of worker and usual full- or part-time status

(Numbers in thousands)

Industry and class of worker

2002

Total

at

work

Worked 1 to 34 hours

Worked

35 hours

or more

Average hours

Total

For

economic

reasons

For noneconomic

reasons

Total

at

work

Persons who

usually work

full time

Usually

work

full

time

Usually

work

part

time

 Total 16 years and over .................................................................... 127,899 30,267 4,035 7,918 18,314 97,632 39.1 42.8

Wage and salary workers ................................................................... 119,834 27,641 3,623 7,385 16,634 92,193 39.1 42.7

 Mining ............................................................................................... 483 37 4 23 9 446 48.1 48.7

 Construction ..................................................................................... 7,938 1,353 398 560 395 6,584 40.5 42.0

 Manufacturing ................................................................................... 17,286 1,960 365 992 602 15,326 42.1 43.0

 Durable goods ................................................................................ 10,435 1,088 196 620 271 9,347 42.4 43.0

 Nondurable goods .......................................................................... 6,851 872 169 372 331 5,979 41.6 42.9

 Transportation and public utilities ..................................................... 8,870 1,353 208 574 571 7,517 41.7 43.5

 Wholesale and retail trade ................................................................ 25,816 8,360 1,193 1,165 6,002 17,456 36.9 42.9

 Finance, insurance, and real estate ................................................. 8,196 1,438 103 575 761 6,758 40.3 42.4

 Service industries ............................................................................. 45,287 12,194 1,314 2,877 8,003 33,093 38.0 42.4

 Private households ......................................................................... 793 439 73 37 329 354 29.4 41.5

 All other industries .......................................................................... 44,494 11,755 1,241 2,841 7,673 32,739 38.1 42.4

 Public administration ........................................................................ 5,959 947 37 619 291 5,013 40.7 41.9

Self-employed workers ....................................................................... 7,971 2,568 407 527 1,634 5,403 39.0 45.4

Unpaid family workers ........................................................................ 94 58 5 6 47 36 31.6 44.5
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Network Communications, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC.January 17, 2007
    
    /s/ Gerard P. ParkerGerard P. ParkerSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORTPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, the undersigned, JayC. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer of Forgent Networks, Inc. (the “Company”),do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       Thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended October 31,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ JAY C. PETERSON     |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Jay C. Peterson         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | December 15, 2006       |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Forgent Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Forgent Networks,Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.  The foregoing certification isbeing furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not beingfiled as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

----
STEVEN T. RAPPOPORT 

SRappoport@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

250 West 55th Street 

New York, NY 10019-9601 

Telephone: 212.468.8000 

Attorney for Defendant 

L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

ex rel. JAMES STEUERT, 

Plaintiff, 

v. No. 1:11-cv-03385-JHR-MJS 

L-3 COMMUNICATIONS 

CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION’S 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, defendant L3 Harris Technologies, Inc. 

f/k/a L-3 Communications Corporation states that it is a public corporation, it has no parent 

corporation, and no public corporation owns 10% or more of its stock. 

Case 1:11-cv-03385-JHR-MJS Document 8 Filed 06/30/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 26
- 2 - 

Dated: June 30, 2021 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

 

By: /s/ Steven T. Rappoport 

Steven T. Rappoport 

250 West 55th Street 

New York, NY 10019-9601 

Tel: (212) 468-8000 

Fax: (212) 468-7900 

E-mail: SRappoport@mofo.com

W. Jay DeVecchio* 

Edward Jackson* 

*(Pro Hac Vice forthcoming) 

2100 L St. N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20037 

Tel: (202) 887-1500 

Fax: (202) 887-0763 

E-mail: JDeVecchio@mofo.com 

E-mail: EJackson@mofo.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

L-3 Communications Corporation

 

Case 1:11-cv-03385-JHR-MJS Document 8 Filed 06/30/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 27
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00374

- CR

Wallace Wayne Bowman

, Jr.

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 97th District Court

of Montague County (2008

-

0000143M

- CR)

August 29 , 2013

Per Curiam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed f or

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 By:
Name:
    
    /s/ Michael Nole

Michael NoleTitle:
    
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    November 14, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

K-BEECH, INC. :

Plaintiff : Civil Action No. 11-3614(FSH)

v. :

JOHN DOES 1-26, : ORDER

Defendants :

This matter having come before the Court on its review of the docket;

and the docket reflecting that the plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint that substituted

the original Plaintiff, Patrick Collins, with plaintiff K-Beech, Inc., ECF NO. 5;

and the docket sheet incorrectly identifying K-Beech as a defendant and thus the docket

needing to be corrected;

IT IS THEREFORE ON this 6th day of July, 2011

ORDERED that the Clerk shall correct the docket to reflect that the caption set forth in

the Amended Complaint, filed as ECF No. 5. 

s/Patty Shwartz

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:11-cv-03614-FSH -PS Document 9 Filed 07/06/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 99