alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JANET L. GOLD, ESQUIRE

EISENBERG, GOLD, CETTEI & AGRAWAL, P.C.

1040 North Kings Highway, Suite 200

Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08034

Telephone: (856) 330-6200

Facsimile: (856) 330-6207

Email: jgold@egclawfirm.com

File No. RL-241-G

Attorney for Mark Ray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

EDWARD SCHWARTZ, on behalf of 

himself and all other similarly situated, 

 

 Plaintiff,

v.

AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, LLC and 

AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC., 

 Defendants.

11 Civ. 4052 (JLL) (JAD)

DANIEL KLEIN and STEPHANIE KLEIN, 

on behalf of themselves and all other 

similarly situated, 

 

 Plaintiff,

v.

BUDGET RENT A CAR SYSTEM, INC. 

and AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC., 

 Defendants.

12 Civ. 7300 (JLL) (JAD)

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

Kindly enter my appearance on behalf of Mark Ray, a Class Member/Objector.

Date: April 6, 2016 /s/ Janet L. Gold

Janet L. Gold, Esquire

Case 2:11-cv-04052-JLL-JAD Document 181 Filed 04/06/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 4503
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 6, 2016, I caused to be filed the foregoing Entry of 

Appearance using the court’s ECF system, which will provide a copy thereof to counsel who 

have entered appearances in this matter. 

Date: April 6, 2016 /s/ Janet L. Gold

Janet L. Gold, Esquire

Case 2:11-cv-04052-JLL-JAD Document 181 Filed 04/06/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 4504
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-41301 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. GERMAN LOPEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 6:10-CR-77-1
Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Th e F e d e r a l P ub l i c Defender appointed to represent G e r m a n L o p e z - G a r c i a has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez-Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

cou n s e l is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Octob er 21 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Pur sua nt to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has det erm ined thatt his op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-41301 Document: 00511640575 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
A06A0424.

#### In the Interest of L. S., a child.

(630 SE2d 177)

Barnes, Judge.

L. S. appeals the judgment of the Juvenile Court of Fulton County denying his motion to vacate a dispositional order and enter a plea of incompetence. He contends the juvenile court erred by refusing to vacate the disposition order and transfer the case to the Juvenile Court of Clayton County and also erred by failing to hold a competency hearing. Because the State concedes that the juvenile court erred by finding it had no jurisdiction to reopen the case and recommends that we vacate the juvenile court’s order and remand the case for further proceedings, we will adopt the State’s recommendation.

The record shows that L. S. was adjudicated delinquent by the Juvenile Court of Clayton County following his admission that he committed theft by receiving an automobile, concealing the identification of a motor vehicle, driving without a license, speeding, and violating curfew. The Juvenile Court of Clayton County then transferred the case to the Juvenile Court of Fulton County for disposition because L. S. is a resident of Fulton County. After a disposition *32hearing, the juvenile court committed L. S. to the Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice.

Decided April 19, 2006.

*Linda A. Pace,*for appellant.

*PaulL. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Kathleen A. Giroux, LynK. Armstrong, Ay ana C. Curry, Assistant District Attorneys,*for appellee.

The record further shows, however, that because of charges against L. S. in DeKalb County, the Juvenile Court of DeKalb County had ordered a mental competency evaluation of L. S., and the evaluation by a State psychologist found that L. S. was not competent to stand trial. As a result, his plea of incompetence was granted in DeKalb County.

The next month, L. S. filed a motion to vacate the disposition order and enter a plea of incompetence. Following a hearing on that motion, the juvenile court denied the motion because the court believed that it lacked jurisdiction to grant the relief requested.

As the State concedes that the trial court’s ruling was erroneous and recommends that we remand the case to the Juvenile Court of Fulton County, see OCGA§ 15-11-40 (a) (3); *Huzzie v. State,*236 Ga. App. 192, 193 (1) (512 SE2d 5) (1999), we need not address in detail the arguments of the parties. Accordingly, the judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the Juvenile Court of Fulton County for further proceedings. Upon the juvenile court’s resolution of the issue, if necessary, the appellant may reinitiate his appeal by timely filing a notice of appeal within 30 days of the juvenile court’s order ruling on his motions. Ga. Const, of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. IV.

*Judgment vacated and remanded with direction.*

*Andrews, P. J., and Bernes, J., concur.*
# field_descriptions

# qcew_fdi_state_cnty_2012
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 134 (Wednesday, July 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34320-34321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16721]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13475-000]

FFP Project 64, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application 
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and 
Competing Applications

July 8, 2009.
    On May 22, 2009, FFP Project 64, LLC filed an application for a 
preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, 
proposing to study the feasibility of the Palmetto Point Hydrokinetic 
Project, to be located on the Mississippi River, in Concordia Parish, 
Louisiana and Wilkinson County, Mississippi.
    The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant 
the permit holder priority to file a license application during the 
permit term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder 
to perform any land-disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands 
or waters owned by others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed Palmetto Point Hydrokinetic Project consists of: (1) 
5,069 proposed 40 kilowatt Free Flow generating units having a total 
installed capacity of 202.76 megawatts; (2) a 7-mile-long, 69 kilovolt 
transmission line; and (3) appurtenant facilities. The proposed 
Palmetto Point Hydrokinetic

[[Page 34321]]

Project would have an average annual generation of 888 gigawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Ramya Swaminathan, Vice President of 
Development, Free Flow Power Corporation, 33 Commercial Street, 
Gloucester, MA 01930; phone: (978) 226-1531.
    FERC Contact: Kim Carter, (202) 502-6486.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project, including a copy of 
the application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of 
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. 
Enter the docket number (P-13475) in the docket number field to access 
the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-16721 Filed 7-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
## T RIAL 

## C OURT 

## O FFICIAL 

## ’ S 

## R EQUEST FOR 

## E XTENSION OF 

## T IME TO 

## F ILE 

## R ECORD
Fax to Cathy S. Lusk, 12 th Court of Appeals, Tyler, TX. Fax # (903) 593-2193

Court of Appeals No. (If Known): _12-15-00029-CV___________________

Trial Court Style: TONYA M. ALLEN DDS, P.A. VS SMITH COUNTY APPRAISAL

DISTRICT

Trial Court & County: 114th District Court Smith Trial Court No.: 14-1121-B

Date Trial Clerk’s Record Originally Due: 05-08-15

Date Court Reporter’s/Recorder’s Record Originally Due: 05-

08-15

Anticipated Number of Pages of Record: 150

I am responsible for preparing a record in this appeal but I am unable to file the record by the original due date for the following reason(s): (check all th at apply – attach additional pages if necessary)

To the best of my knowledge, the Appellant has made no claim of indigence and has failed to either pay the required fee or to make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the record

My duties listed below preclude working on this record

x I have had not respond from the attorney I have called and let a message bill of cost has not been paid $189.00. I have contact attorney by phone and letter.

I anticipate this record will be completed and forwarded to the 12 th Court of Appeals by, 06-22-15
And I hereby request an additional 30 days within which to prepare the record.
TEX.R.APP.P.37.3.

In compliance with TEX.R.APP.P.9.5(e), I certify that a copy of this notice has been served on counsel for all parties to the Trial Court’s judgment or order being appealed. I further certify by my signature below that the information contained in this notice is true and within my personal knowledge.

Date: 5/13/2015 / S/ Linda Rhymes

Phone Number: 903-590-1677 / S/ Linda Rhymes Deputy Clerk

### T EXAS 

### R ULE OF 

### A PPELLATE 

### P ROCEDURE 

### 9.5(e) reads:

Certificate requirements: A certificate of service must be signed by the person who made
the service and must state:



### (1) the date and manner of service; 

### (2) the name and address of each person served; and 

### (3) if the person served is a party’s attorney, the name of the party represented by that attorney.

The following parties have been served with a copy of this document:

Lead Counsel for APPELLANT(S): Lead Counsel for APPELLEE(S):

Name: MICHAEL W. EATON Name: SANDRA GRIFFIN

Address: 109 RIVER OAKS DRIVE
SUITE 150
SOUTHLAKE TX 76092 Address: 3301 NORTHLAND DRIVE
SUITE 505
AUSTIN TX 78731

Phone #: 817-431-1111 Phone #: 512-302-0190

Attorney For: P.A. TONYA M. ALLEN, DDS Attorney For: SMITH COUNTY APPRAISAL
DISTRICT
CERTIFICATIONS

I, V. Terence Franzke, Chief Financial Officer of Capital Group  One,
Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Capital
Group One, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-
14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
indicated in this annual report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 15, 2007

/s/ V. Terence Franzke
-----------------------
V. Terence Franzke
Chief Executive Officer
# Forklifts9210

Fatal occupational injuries involving forklifts, 1992-2010 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries involving forklifts, 1992-2010		

Fatal occupational injuries involving forklifts, 1992-2010 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries involving forklifts, 1992-2010		

Page &P
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 19

- 1614

_____________________________ T ERRANCE L AMAR J ACKSON , Petitioner ,

v.
S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

— Original Jurisdiction

.

June 6, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. D ENIED

. R OBERTS , O STERHAUS , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Terrance Lamar Jackson, pro se , Petitioner

.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General , Tallahassee, for Respondent

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         662,152
<SECURITIES>                                   321,199
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,223
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,490)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,325
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,001,817
<PP&E>                                          60,215
<DEPRECIATION>                                (33,402)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,362,698
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          126,889
<BONDS>                                        242,242
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          574,653
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                     418,602
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,362,698
<SALES>                                          1,061
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,530
<CGS>                                            1,927
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,528
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,994
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (76,532)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (76,532)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (76,532)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.86)


</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ALELI HERNANDEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2727

[November 14, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Joseph Marx, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 502008CF018482AXXXWB.

Aleli Hernandez, Mayo, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Nanosphere, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ann Wallin, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|   |                                                                                                                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                    
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ann WallinAnn WallinInterim Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


April 2, 2015


This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EFiled: Oct 14 2011 4:20PM EDT 

Transaction ID 40370014 

Case No. 6720-CS

Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 81-1 Filed 10/18/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 2830
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 81-1 Filed 10/18/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2831
EXHIBIT 99.3

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Federal Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, dated the
date of this Certification (the "Report"), I, Connie Ayres LaPlante, the
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.


Date:  May 13, 2003                    By: /s/ Connie Ayres LaPlante
                                           --------------------------------
                                               Connie Ayres LaPlante
                                               Treasurer
                                               (Chief Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to First Federal Bancorp, Inc., and will be retained by First
Federal Bancorp, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
0

20

40

60

80

100

16 to 19

years

20 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 years 

and over

Chart 5-2. Women's labor force participation patterns are 

now more like those of men

Men

Women

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Percent

Age

1970

2005

2005

1970

Chart 5-2. Women’s labor force participation patterns are 

now more like those of men

• In 1970, the impact of marriage and motherhood on women's labor force 

participation rates was strikingly evident. At that time, their participation 

reached its initial peak at ages 20-24, dropped at ages 25-34, and then gradually 

rose to a second peak at ages 45-54 before tapering off. 

• In 2005, this pattern of peaks and valleys was no longer evident, as women had 

increasingly added the role of worker to their lives. Indeed, women's labor 

force participation pattern by age now resembles that of men, although at a 

lower overall participation rate.