alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         30,642
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  263,552
<ALLOWANCES>                                   37,160
<INVENTORY>                                    31,313
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               497,166
<PP&E>                                         286,451
<DEPRECIATION>                                 146,072
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,038,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          517,374
<BONDS>                                        2,085,158
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          558,593
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       988,082
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,142,623)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,038,416
<SALES>                                        837,449
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               837,449
<CGS>                                          190,687
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  190,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               614,305
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             81,536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (50,878)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (50,878)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (50,878)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.53)



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Crirn. No. 11-282 (DMC)

v.

HONORABLE DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH, U.S.D.J.

ALFRED HERNANDEZ,

CONSENT ORDERTO

Defendant. : AMEND PRETRIAL

RELEASE CONDITIONS

THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon the application of Defendant Alfred

Hernandez (Candace Horn, Assistant Federal Public Defender, appearing) for an order modifying

bail conditions in this matter, and the Government (Kathleen O’Leary, Assistant United States

Attorney, appearing), and U.S. Pretrial Services having no objection to Mr. Hernandez’s request;

and for good cause shown;

IT IS on this /J day of May 2012,

HEREBY ORDERED that the bail conditions previously imposed upon Mr. Hernandez

are modified as follows: U.S. Pretrial Services is ordered to release Mr. Hernandez’s passport to

him for the limited purpose ofrenewing his state-issued identification card, and Mr. Hernandez is

to return the passport to U.S. Pretrial Services as soon as his identification card is renewed; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other bail conditions remain the same.

HONORABLE DENNIS . ANAUGH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
|     |                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                         |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all in material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                              |
|----------------------------------------------|
|                                              |
| /s/ Scott E. Powell                          |
| Name: Scott E. Powell                        |
| Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, the undersigned, Richard N. Snyder, Chief Executive Officer, of Forgent
Networks, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. |  | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
period ended October 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.                                                                                                 

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ RICHARD N. SNYDER  
| |                        
| | Richard N. Snyder      
| | Chief Executive Officer
| | December 15, 2003
Exhibit 32.1





Written Statement of the Principal Executive Officer & Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008 (the “Report”) by Westergaard.Com, Inc. ("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.








Date:  December 18, 2009





/s/  Anne Straton


Anne Straton


Principal Executive Officer & Principal Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to Westergaard.Com, Inc and will be retained by Westergaard.Com, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with the Annual Report of JCP&L Transition Funding LLC ("Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each undersigned
officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of his knowledge:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.



                                                     /s/ Stephen E. Morgan
                                                     -----------------------
                                                       Stephen E. Morgan
                                                              President
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                          March 26, 2004



                                                     /s/ Richard H. Marsh
                                                     -----------------------
                                                       Richard H. Marsh
                                                    Senior Vice President and
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                         March 26, 2004
Exhibit 12.1

CEO SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Arthur J. Young, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of PSi Technologies Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of
companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys
internal control over financial reporting.



By:

/S/    ARTHUR J. YOUNG,
JR.Name:

Arthur J. Young, Jr.Title:

Chief Executive OfficerAugust 15, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

VASSILIKI KOUKOUTAS : 

 

 : Civil Action No. 11-3091 (SDW)

 

 Plaintiff (s)

 :

 vs 

 : ORDER OF DISMISSAL

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY 

SOLUTIONS :

 

 Defendant(s) :

It has been reported to the Court that the above-captioned matter has been settled, 

It is on this 14 day of March, 2012 th

 

ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs,

subject to the right of the parties upon good cause shown within 60 days, to reopen the action if the

settlement is not consummated. The terms of the settlement agreement are incorporated herein by

reference and the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the settlement agreement to enforce its terms.

 /s/ Susan D. Wigenton 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Case 2:11-cv-03091-SDW-MCA Document 16 Filed 03/14/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 63
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 18

- 4344

_____________________________ V ERNON S TEWART P OLK , Petitioner ,

v.
S TATE O F F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

— Original Jurisdiction

.

October 3, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. D ISMISSED

. See Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).
R AY , C.J., and W OLF and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Vernon Stewart Polk, pro se , Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent

.
#### ALI AKBER KIACHIF et al. v. PHILCO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

April 6, 1950.

Samuel B. Ohlbaum, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Donovan, Leisure, Newton, Lumbard & Irvine, New York City, Granville Whit-tlesey, Jr. and Joseph S. Kelley, New York City, for defendant.

McGOHEY, District Judge.

Defendant moves under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 37(d), 28 U.S.C.A., to dismiss the complaint for failure of plaintiff Gholam H. Kiachif to appear for deposition pursuant to notices served on his attorney January 21, 1949 and February 28, 1950.

It appears that Gholam H. Kiachif, who is a resident of Iran, was in this country in 1948 but, as the result of a heart attack, *279was in a hospital continuously from the day of his arrival until his departure, which was prior to the service of the notice of January 21, 1949; and that he was in Iran at the time of the service of the second notice. His attorney, upon receipt of the notice of February 28, 1950, informed the defendant’s attorney that ill health and the great distance involved precluded appearance of this plaintiff.

There is clearly no showing that the plaintiff’s failure to appear was wilful. Indeed, he was out of the country when the notice was served on his attorney.

The defendant urges quite strongly that it must have this plaintiff’s testimony in order to prepare its defense. And plaintiffs’ attorney says that he, too, would like to have it; and that he will gladly “join in an application for the examination of Gholam H. Kiachif by means of letters rogatory.” If the parties agree, this may be considered as a motion under Rule 28(b) for an order directing issuance of letters rogatory to the appropriate judicial authority in Teheran for examination of Gholam H. Kiachif, and they may agree on an appropriate order to he submitted.

The defendant, by another motion, decided herewith, 10 F.R.D. 277, seeks letters rogatory to examine a witness in Teheran. That motion is being granted and so both examinations could proceed, if not simultaneously, then in quick succession. This would seem to afford both parties what they want and save time also.

The motion to dismiss the complaint, however, is denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: December 17, 2010
    /s/ Ronald B. GeibRonald B. GeibPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
                                                                    ------------

                         Independent Auditiors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Orchid BioSciences, Inc.:

          We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements No. 333-53118 and No. 333-76744 on Form S-8 and No. 333-60582 on Form
S-3 of Orchid BioSciences, Inc. of our report dated February 25, 2002, except as
to note 21, which is as of March 5, 2002, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of Orchid BioSciences, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, and the related
financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2001
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Orchid BioSciences, Inc. Our report refers to the
Company's adoption of the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards ("SFAS") No. 141, "Business Combinations," as of July 1, 2001 and of
certain provisions of SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," as
required for goodwill and other intangibles resulting from business combinations
consummated after June 30, 2001.

                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

Princeton, New Jersey
April 1, 2002
#### DUBLER et al. v. GILBERT.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Aug. 11, 1950.

*531Wagner, Quillinan, Wagner & Tennant, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Max Herschaft, New York City, for defendant.

McGOHEY, District Judge.

The defendant moves (a) to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, (b) alternatively, “for a more definite statement or bill of particulars,” (c) for security for costs. The plaintiffs having removed to this court an action brought in the New York Supreme Court by this defendant, move for consolidation. The defendant consents. Each party seeks to be plaintiff in the consolidated action.

Plaintiffs are residents of Wohlen, Switzerland, and defendant is a resident of New York. Defendant became plaintiffs’ selling agent in 1937, and during the period 1937-1949 received shipments of merchandise from them for sale.

The motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for a more definite statement or bill of particulars is denied. The complaint sets out with sufficient detail the claim which the plaintiffs assert against the defendant so that the latter can responsively plead to it. It is not required to do- more.1 *The detailed information which the defendant claims to need “to simplify the trial” can be obtained by appropriate use of the simple and expeditious methods provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.2

The motion to -consolidate is granted. It is clear to me that Gilbert’s claim, stated in the removed action, is a counterclaim against the plaintiffs arising out of the admitted relationship between them. Accordingly the consolidated action will be entitled as this one is, and Gilbert’s complaint will be considered as setting out his counterclaim.

The defendant’s request for security for costs is reasonable in my opinion, sin-ce the plaintiffs are residents of a foreign country. The order to be entered will provide for such security in the sum of $250.

Settle order.

1

. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., rule 8, 28 U.S.C.A.; Securities and Exchange Commission v. Timetrust, Inc., D.C.N.D.C'al., 28 F.Supp. 34, 41; 2 Moore’s Federal Practice, 1649-1651, 2245 (2d ed.).

2

. Fed.R.Civ.P., 16, 26-37 ; 2 Moore’s Federal Practice 2283-84 (2d ed.).
[No. 31922-5-II.

Division Two.

November 1, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Shanti Paul Burr, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 03-1-03880-8, Rosanne Buckner, J., entered June 28, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J., concurred in by Armstrong and Hunt, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of ThermoEnergy Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report"), I,
Dennis C. Cossey, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  November
16, 2009




By:
              /s/ Dennis C. CosseyName:
      Dennis C. CosseyTitle:
      Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer