alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 13.2 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to section 906 if the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Crayfish Co., Ltd., a
Japanese company (the Company), hereby certifies, that: The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  April 12, 2005
    By:

/s/ Fumiya HoshinoFumiya HoshinoPrincipal officer of administration department
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of PRIMEDIA Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kelly P. Conlin,Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Kelly P. Conlin                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Kelly  P. Conlin                       |
| Chief  Executive Officer and President |
| August  9, 2004                        |

 

This certificationaccompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

65

----
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying  with 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, the  undersigned
President and Chief Executive Officer of Speaking Roses  International,  Inc., a
Utah corporation (the "Company"),  hereby certify,  based on my knowledge,  that
the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the three  months ended
September  30, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section  13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  and  that  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

By /s/ Blaine Harris
------------------------------
Blaine Harris, President
and Chief Executive Officer

November 17, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 137 (Monday, July 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35229-35230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17168]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

July 13, 2009.
    The Department of Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the date of publication of this notice. Copies of the 
submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance 
Officer listed. Comments regarding this information collection should 
be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department 
Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, 1750 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before August 19, 2009 
to be assured of consideration.

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)

    OMB Number: 1506-0001.
    Type of Review: Extension.

[[Page 35230]]

    Title: Suspicious Activity Report by Depository Institutions.
    Description: FinCEN and the five Federal financial institutions 
supervisory agencies require banks, to report on a consolidated, 
uniform form, to a single location, reports of suspicious transactions.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 1,344,594 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Russell Stephenson (202) 354-6012, Department of 
the Treasury, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, P.O. Box 39, 
Vienna, VA 22183.
    OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed (202) 395-7873, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.

Robert Dahl,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-17168 Filed 7-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-02-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Centillium Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Faraj Aalaei, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Dated: March 13, 2006 | /s/ Faraj Aalaei
                       Faraj Aalaei Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13b-14(b) OF THE
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

In connection with the Annual Report of Subjex Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew D. Hyder,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

Date: April 17, 2006                              By: /s/  Andrew D. Hyder
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Chairman, President
#### Frick and others *v.*Clements and others.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. Georgia, W. D.*

*1887.)*

*1.*United States Courts—Pleading—Set-Off.

A set-off may be pleaded as a defense to an action brought in the United States courts in any state where that plea is permissible by the laws of the state.

2. Same—Reply to Set-Off.

It is not, in the courts of the United States, a proper reply to a set-off showing a moneyed indebtedness to the defendant, for the plaintiff to show that the defendant has personal property in his possession belonging to the plaintiff, which the defendant will not restore to the plaintiff.

*(Syllabus by the Court.)*

At Law.

*Lanier &*Anderson, for plaintiffs.

*Bacon & Rutherford,*for defendants.

Speer, J.

Frick *&*Co. have brought suit against Clements and others as principals, and M. J. Hatcher & Co. as indorsers, on two promissory notes for about $375 each. The makers of the notes make no defense. Hatcher & Co. defend on the ground that Frick & Co. are indebted to them for various sums, growing out of certain cross-obligations arising under the contract by which Hatcher & Co. became indorsers for Clements and others.

Now, this is an action at law, and a set-off is permissible. In *Partridge v. Insurance Co.,*15 Wall. 573, it is distinctly held by the *supreme*court of the United States that a set-off may.be pleaded as a defense to an action brought in the United States courts in any state where that plea is permissible by the laws of the state, and set-off is a familiar plea in Georgia. It is sought, however, to reply to the plea of set-off, (evidence in support of which, if worthy of belief, presents distinct matters of indebtedness on the part of the plaintiffs to the defendants Hatcher & Co.,) by replying that the defendants Hatcher & Co. have in their possession, under the same contract, certain engines and other personal property belonging to the plaintiffs, which they refused to deliver to plaintiffs; and it is sought to oppose the value of these engines to the set-off which Hatcher & Co. have proven. Necessarily that involves the idea of unliquidated damages depending on tortious conduct. If this *543had been a suit in equity, and the allegations were that Hatcher & Co. were insolvent, or that the plaintiffs could not recover damages from them for the improper custody and detention of their engines, there might be some propriety in this reply. It is, however, an equitable reply to a legal defense, and cannot, in the opinion of the court, be entertained at common law. It is not alleged that Hatcher & Co. are irresponsible, nor could such evidence be heard in an action at common law. The plaintiffs can bring their action against Hatcher & Co. for trover, and recover their engines, if they are entitled to do so. They may either recover the property itself, or its highest value, since it was wrongfully converted by Hatcher & Co. So it is not a proper reply to Hatcher,& Co.’s claim for commissions, etc., that they refused to turn over these engines, and the evidence is excluded.

The plaintiffs thereupon took judgment against the maker of the notes, and dismissed the action as to Hatcher & Co.
|   | (a) | our periodic report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Form 10-K”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related interpretations; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and our results of operations. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Carlos A. Cabrera |   |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|
|   | Carlos A. Cabrera     |   |
|   | Executive Chairman    |   |
|   |                  |   |
| Date:  | March 15, 2012        |   |

----
PATRICK COLLINS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEFF HITCHCOCK, JUAN DICKERSON, 

MARY KLINE, FLOYD G. REMLEY, AND

JOHN DOE 23 AND JOHN DOE 33,

 Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 2:11-cv-04203-FSH-PS

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANTS, JEFF HITCHCOCK A.K.A. JOHN DOE 9, 

MARY KLINE A.K.A. JOHN DOE 17, FLOYD G. REMLEY A.K.A. JOHN DOE 38 AND 

JOHN DOE 23

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, Plaintiff hereby voluntary dismisses Defendants Jeff 

Hitchcock a.k.a. John Doe 9, Mary Kline a.k.a. John Doe 17, Floyd G. Remley a.k.a. John Doe 

38 and John Doe 23 (“Defendants”), from this action with prejudice. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(a)(1)(A)(i) Defendants have neither answered Plaintiff’s Complaint nor filed a motion for 

summary judgment. 

Consistent herewith, Plaintiff consents to having this case closed for administrative 

purposes.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Samantha Lutzer

Samantha Lutzer (SE0898)

Bowles Crow Lutzer & Newman, LLP.

54 W. 21st Street, Suite 1007

New York, NY 10010

T: 646.374.0351

F:866.844.8305

sam@bowlescrow.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:11-cv-04203-FSH-PS Document 45 Filed 03/01/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 410
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 1, 2012 I electronically filed the foregoing document with 

the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF and that service was perfected on all counsel of record and 

interested parties through this system.

s/ Samantha Lutzer

Samantha Lutzer (SE0898)

Case 2:11-cv-04203-FSH-PS Document 45 Filed 03/01/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 411
Case 2:11-cr-00525-SDW Document 14 Filed 01/31/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 28
Case 2:11-cr-00525-SDW Document 14 Filed 01/31/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 29
Page



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northeast Bancorp (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert S. Johnson, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|November 14, 2002 | /s/ Robert S. Johnson  
|----------------- | -----------------------
|                  | Robert S. Johnson      
|                  | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                           6,835
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     20,268
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,755
<PP&E>                                          11,626
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,834
<BONDS>                                          5,166
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            76
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,752
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,904
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,780
<CGS>                                            9,420
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,022
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,444
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,526
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,933
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
        

</TABLE>
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 17

- 00025

- CR

BOBBY RAY TURNER, JR., Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 102nd District Court Bowie County, Texas Trial Court No. 16F0481

- 102

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 

### O R D E R Appellant Bobby Ray Turner, Jr., was convicted in Bowie County, Texas, of burglary of a habitation with a prior felony conviction and was sentenced to twenty years’ incarceration. The trial court appointed J. Randle Smolarz to represent Turner on appeal, and on April 18, 2017, Smolarz filed an appellate brief on Turner’s behalf.

It has come to this Court’s attention that sometime after April 18, 2017, Smolarz was hired by the Bowie County District Attorney’s Office as an assistant district attorney. The Bowie County District Attorney’s Office is, obviously, representing the State in this ma tter. Given that Smolarz is now a member of the Bowie County District Attorney’s Office, his continued representation of Turner in this matter is inappropriate. In light of the foregoing, on our own motion, and in the interests of justice, we abate this

a ppeal to the trial court with directions to relieve J. Randle Smolarz of any further responsibility in this matter and to appoint new counsel to represent Turner before this Court through the remainder of the appeal. We are confident that the Bowie County District Attorney’s Office has established an appropriate wall between Smolarz and all aspects of this case. The trial court need not hold a hearing to accomplish this new appointment. A written memorialization of the trial court’s new appointment shall be entered into the record of the case and presented to this Court in the form of a supplemental clerk’s record within five days of the date of this order, or on or before August 7, 2017. Upon receipt of the supplemental clerk’s record identifying new cou nsel, this abatement will terminate. We will not withdraw the current3

submission date of July 31, 2017, but will, instead, cease further consideration of the appeal until jurisdiction has been returned to this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: July 31, 2017
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer Income Tax Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, August 11, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718 488-3557.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer Income Tax Issue Committee will be held Tuesday, August 11, 2009, at 2 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Marisa Knispel. For more information please contact Ms. Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                

The agenda will include various IRS Issues.

Dated: July 16, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-17465 Filed 7-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P