alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1.     | The name of the entity for which correction is being made:                               |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                     |
|   | Blugrass Energy Inc.                                                                     |
|   |                                                                                     |
| 2.     | Description of the original document for which correction is being made:                 |
|   |                                                                                     |
|   | Certificate of Change Pursuant to NRS 78.209                                             |
|   |                                                                                     |
| 3.     | Filing date of the original document for which correction is being made:                 |
|   |                                                                                     |
|   | 3/31/2011                                                                                |
|   |                                                                                     |
| 4.     | Description of the inaccuracy or defect:                                                 |
|   |                                                                                     |
|   | Name of the corporation incorrectly stated, in paragraph 1 of the Certificate of Change. |
|   |                                                                                     |
| 5.     | Correction of the inaccuracy or defect:                                                  |
|   |                                                                                     |
|   | Name of the corporation:  Blugrass Energy Inc.                                 |
|   |                                                                                     |
| 6.     | Signature:                                                                               |

| /s/ Abram Janz       | President & Chief Executive Officer |  April 12, 2011 |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------|----------------------|
| Authorized Signature | Title                                   |  Date           |

----
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the  Annual Report of The Children's  Internet,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2003, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Sholeh Hamedani,  Chief Executive Officer,  President,  and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of  operations  of the
        Company.


 /s/ SHOLEH HAMEDANI
---------------------------------
Sholeh Hamedani,
Chief Executive Officer, President,
and Chief Financial Officer
March 22, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5297 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5297

     For the relief of the Big Spring Independent School District.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2004

Mr. Neugebauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     For the relief of the Big Spring Independent School District.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR GRANTS UNDER RURAL AND LOW-INCOME SCHOOL 
              PROGRAM.

     The Big Spring Independent School District in the State of Texas 
shall be eligible to receive a grant under subpart 2 of part B of title 
VI of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
7351 et seq.; commonly referred to as the ``Rural and Low-Income School 
Program'') for any fiscal year in which the Big Spring Independent 
School District--
            (1) meets the eligibility criterion of section 
        6221(b)(1)(A) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 7351(b)(1)(A)); and
            (2) would meet the eligibility criterion of section 
        6221(b)(1)(B) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 7351(b)(1)(A)), but for 
        the inclusion of the Federal prison population in the 
        calculation of the school locale codes described in that 
        section.
                                 <all>
```
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x 

ANTHONY STOKES, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

JOHN STEPHENS a/k/a JOHN LEGEND, 

SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, 

COLUMBIA RECORDS, GETTING OUT OUR 

DREAMS, INC. d/b/a G.O.O.D. Music, JOHN 

DOES 1-20, fictitious persons, and XYZ 

CORPORATIONS 1-20, fictitious entities, 

Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x 

CASE NO.: 2:11-cv-03849 

(SDW) (MCA) 

ECF CASE

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record: 

Please enter the withdrawal of Dolores F. DiBella of Proskauer Rose LLP as counsel of 

record in this case for Defendants JOHN STEPHENS a/k/a JOHN LEGEND (“Legend”), SONY 

MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT and COLUMBIA RECORDS (collectively “Sony Music,” as 

Columbia Records has been erroneously sued as a separate legal entity), and GETTING OUT 

OUR DREAMS, INC. d/b/a G.O.O.D. Music (“GM,” erroneously sued herein as GETTING 

OUT OUR DREAMS MUSIC) (collectively, the “Defendants”). As of December 30, 2011, I 

will no longer be affiliated with the law firm Proskauer Rose LLP. 

The Defendants will continue to be represented by Elizabeth A. Figueira (whose 

appearance has been recently entered) and Charles B. Ortner of Proskauer Rose LLP. A pro hac

application will also be forthcoming from Sandra A. Crawshaw-Sparks of Proskauer Rose LLP. 

Case 2:11-cv-03849-SDW -MCA Document 21 Filed 12/21/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 114
2 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: New York, New York 

 December 21, 2011 

 PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 

 

 By:_ s/ Dolores F. DiBella____

 Dolores F. DiBella (DD-9637) 

Eleven Times Square 

New York, New York 10036 

Telephone: 212.969.3000 

Facsimile: 212.969.2900 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I caused the counsel of record for Plaintiff to be served with a copy of 

the foregoing document via ECF, on 21st of December 2011. 

Dated: December 21, 2011 

 __ s/ Dolores F. DiBella__________ 

 Dolores F. DiBella (DD 9637) 

Case 2:11-cv-03849-SDW -MCA Document 21 Filed 12/21/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 115
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of Mattmar Minerals, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Arnold P. Kling,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934, as amended; and                  
| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2) | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 6, 2010

|                   
|-------------------
|/s/ Arnold P. Kling
|                   
|Arnold P. Kling    
|President          

A signed original of this
certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

---
Case 2:11-cv-03986-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1
Case 2:11-cv-03986-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 07/12/11 Page 2 of 6 PageID: 2
Case 2:11-cv-03986-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 07/12/11 Page 3 of 6 PageID: 3
Case 2:11-cv-03986-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 07/12/11 Page 4 of 6 PageID: 4
Case 2:11-cv-03986-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 07/12/11 Page 5 of 6 PageID: 5
Case 2:11-cv-03986-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 07/12/11 Page 6 of 6 PageID: 6
#### In the Matter of Melissa B., Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 586]

*537The Family Court has broad discretion as to the dispositional orders it enters. In this instance, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in adjudicating the appellant a juvenile delinquent and then placing her on probation for 12 months. Such an adjudication was particularly appropriate in view of her relatively poor record of attendance at school and the recommendation made in the probation report that she is in need of supervision. Moreover, the appellant in this case committed a type of misconduct that warrants a determination, at the least, that she was a juvenile delinquent. That this was her first brush with the law does not entitle her to an adjudication of an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal (hereinafter an ACD) *(see Matter of Oneil D.,*35 AD3d 602 [2006]; *Matter of Rosario S.,*18 AD3d 563 [2005]; *Matter of Nikita P.,*3 AD3d 499, 500-501 [2004]).

We further note that an ACD is limited to a maximum period of six months. Thus, once the Family Court determined that a period of supervision longer than six months was required, the entry of an ACD was no longer an option *(see*Family Ct Act § 315.3 [1]; *see Matter of Antonio C.,*294 AD2d 123 [2002]; *Matter of Raymond*A., 136 AD2d 700 [1988]).

The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J.P., Florio, Garni and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2014

d0421 

# Order

Clerk April 28, 2014

148213

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148213

COA: 314828

Bay CC: 11

- 011055

- FC

JOSEPH WAYNE THOMPSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 16, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, becau se we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
HOUSEHOLD DATA HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES ANNUAL AVERAGES

35. Persons not in the labor force by desire and availability for work, age, and sex

(In thousands)

Category

Total Age Sex

2006 2007

16 to 24

years

25 to 54

years

55 years

and over Men Women

2006 2007 2006 2007 2006 2007 2006 2007 2006 2007

Total not in the labor force .................................... 77,387 78,743 14,549 15,192 21,318 21,343 41,520 42,207 29,350 30,036 48,037 48,707

 Do not want a job now 1 ..................................... 72,602 74,040 12,867 13,510 19,221 19,256 40,514 41,275 27,248 27,914 45,354 46,126

 Want a job 1 ........................................................ 4,786 4,703 1,682 1,683 2,097 2,088 1,006 933 2,102 2,122 2,684 2,581

 Did not search for work in previous year .......... 2,758 2,748 883 931 1,155 1,148 720 668 1,145 1,173 1,612 1,575

 Searched for work in previous year 2 ............... 2,028 1,955 800 751 942 939 286 264 956 950 1,071 1,005

 Not available to work now ............................... 580 560 282 272 252 234 46 53 226 223 354 336

 Available to work now ..................................... 1,448 1,395 518 479 690 705 240 211 731 726 717 669

 Reason not currently looking:

 Discouragement over job prospects 3 ........ 381 369 118 110 195 199 68 61 229 226 152 143

 Reasons other than discouragement .......... 1,067 1,026 399 370 495 506 172 150 502 500 565 526

 Family responsibilities .............................. 152 160 31 31 97 109 24 21 35 37 117 123

 In school or training .................................. 207 180 177 149 28 27 2 3 111 102 96 78

 Ill health or disability ................................. 130 114 18 11 76 66 36 37 63 57 68 58

 Other 4 ...................................................... 578 572 174 178 294 304 110 90 292 305 285 267

1 Includes some persons who are not asked if they want a job. 2 Persons who had a job in the prior 12 months must have searched

since the end of that job. 3 Includes believes no work available, could not find work, lacks

necessary schooling or training, employer thinks too young or old, and

other types of discrimination.

4 Includes those who did not actively look for work in the prior 4 weeks

for such reasons as child care and transportation problems, as well as a

small number for which reason for nonparticipation was not ascertained.

 NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the

release of January data.

250
**Exhibit 10.19****DISBURSEMENT REQUEST AND AUTHORIZATION**               **Principal** **Loan Date** **Maturity** **Loan No** Call / Coll **Account** **Officer** **Initials****$3,517,572.00** **03-23-2007** **03-23-2008** **3787** 2200   **242**  References in the shaded area are for Lender’s use only and do not limit the applicability of this document to any particular loan or item. Any item above containing “***” has been omitted due to text length limitations.         **Borrower:** **Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC (TIN:**   **Lender:** **Home Federal Savings Bank**  **48-1200438)**     **Business Banking**  **106 W Main, PO Box C**     **1016 Civic Center Dr NW Suite 300**  **Riceville, IA 50466**     **Rochester, MN 55901****LOAN TYPE.**This is a Fixed Rate (8.250%1 Nondisclosable Loan to a Limited LiabilityCompany for $3,517,572.00 due on March 23, 2008.**PRIMARY PURPOSE OF LOAN.**The primary purpose of this loan is for:o Personal, Family, or Household Purposes or Personal Investment.þ Business (Including Real Estate Investment).**SPECIFIC PURPOSE.**The specific purpose of this loan is: Term loan.**DISBURSEMENT INSTRUCTIONS.**Borrower understands that no loan proceeds will be disbursed untilall of Lender’s conditions for making the loan have been satisfied. Please disburse the loanproceeds of $3,517,572.00 as follows:     **Other Disbursements:** **$****3,500,000.00** $3,500,000.00         **Other Charges Financed:** **$****72.00** $72.00 Mortgage Fee         **Total Financed Prepaid Finance Charges:** **$****17,500.00** $17,500.00 Origination Fee             **Note Principal:** **$****3,517,572.00** BORROWER ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF A COMPLETED COPY OF THIS DISBURSEMENT REQUEST ANDAUTHORIZATION AND ALL OTHER DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THIS DEBT.**FINANCIAL CONDITION. BY SIGNING THIS AUTHORIZATION, BORROWER REPRESENTS AND WARRANTS TOLENDER THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND CORRECT AND THAT THERE HAS BEEN NOMATERIAL ADVERSE CHANGE IN BORROWER’S FINANCIAL CONDITION AS DISCLOSED IN BORROWER’S MOSTRECENT FINANCIAL STATEMENT TO LENDER. THIS AUTHORIZATION IS DATED MARCH 23, 2007.**         **BORROWER:**               **HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC**               **By:** **/s/ Steven K. Eastman** **By:** **/s/ Bernard Retterath**     **Steve Eastman, President of Homeland EnergySolutions, LLC**    **Bernard Retterath, Treasurer of Homeland EnergySolutions, LLC**
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Crim. No. 11-372 (FSH)

v. : O R D E R

RONALD CHAMBERS :

Defendant. :

This matter having come before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge filed in this matter, which was submitted as a result of this Court having

referred this cause to the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of conducting a plea proceeding under

Fed. R. Crim. P. 11; and the defendant having consented to the Magistrate Judge conducting the

guilty plea proceeding; and the Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as

the transcript of the proceedings on September 9, 2011 and there being no objection to the Report

and Recommendation timely filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b); and the Court finding the Report

and Recommendation is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law; and the Court hereby finding

that the Report and Recommendation should be approved and adopted and the defendant’s guilty

plea accepted,

IT IS ON THIS 13 day of October, 2011, th

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is

approved and adopted; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant’s guilty plea is accepted and a judgment

of guilt to Count One of the Indictment shall be entered. 

 s/ Faith S. Hochberg 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: COPART, INC., COPART OF

HOUSTON, INC., AND HOUSTON

COPART SALVAGE AUTO

AUCTIONS, LP

,

Relator s

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 204

- C V

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

O R D E R

On April 12, 2019, the Court abated this original proceeding to give the Honorable Selena

Solis an opportunity to reconsider the ruling of the former judge of the 243rd District Court of El

Paso County. The District Clerk forwarded to this Court an order signed by Judge Solis on May

28, 2019. Therefore, the above

- styled and numbered cause is reinstated. In the event Relators

wish to file an amended mandamus petition, it is due to be filed twenty

- one days from the date of

this order. Any response by the Real Party in Interest is due to be filed twenty

- one days after the

amended mandamus petition is f iled with th e Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5 th day of June

, 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 137 (Monday, July 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 35198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17208]



[[Page 35198]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel; Biotechnology.
    Date: August 17, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 9 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Democracy 1, 6701 
Democracy Blvd., 1070, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Martha F. Matocha, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, 
National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., 1 Democracy 
Plaza, Rm. 1070, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0810, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d6bbb7a2b9b5beb7bb96bbb7bfbaf8b8bfbef8b1b9a0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="563b372239353e373b163b373f3a78383f3e78313920">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical 
Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 93.306, 93.333; 93.702, 
ARRA Related Construction Awards, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: July 14, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-17208 Filed 7-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Hector Ismael SANCHEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-40276

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 2012.

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Hector Ismael Sanchez-Garcia raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by *United States v. Betancourt,*586 F.3d 808, 308-09 (5th Cir.2009), which reaffirmed the holding in *United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez,*319 F.3d 695, 700 (5th Cir.2003), that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of the offense under 21 U.S.C. § 841. The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.