alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Chart 1-19. Six of the 10 industries projected to grow the 

fastest are health related and one is computer related

47

47

49

50

50

55

61

68

70

79

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Percent change in wage and salary employment, projected 2004-2014

Educational support services, private

Home health care services

Software publishers

Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Community care facilities for the elderly

Outpatient care centers, except mental health & substance abuse

Residential mental health and substance abuse facilities

Offices of all other health practitioners

Residential mental retardation facilities

Facilities support services

Chart 1-19. Six of the 10 industries projected to grow the 

fastest are health related and one is computer related

• Private educational support services, projected to be the fastest growing 

industry over the 2004-2014 period, includes educational consulting, guidance 

counseling, and testing organizations.

• Projected employment growth in health care industries is driven by a growing 

and aging population that will demand more medical services, and by medical 

advances that create more types of treatment. Six of the 10 industries 

projected to grow the fastest are health related, including community care 

facilities for the elderly and residential care facilities for mental health and 

substance abuse.

• Information technology will continue to transform the economy and spur job 

growth in computer-related industries. Software publishing employment has 

more than doubled since 1990; as firms continue to invest heavily in 

information technology, employment will continue to grow.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0383

SAMANTHA VULLES, SHERI 

ESTENSON, et. al,

 

 Plaintiffs and Appellants,

 v. 

THIES & TALLE MANAGEMENT, INC., 

THIES & TALLE ENTERPRISES, INC., 

ALAMANOR INVESTORS LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP, AND JOHN DOES 1-4

 Defendants and Appellees.

AMENDED ORDER OF 

MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT Alice J. Hinshaw, whose name appears next on the list 

of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is 

maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5),

A notice advises that this appeal is from a money judgment of less than $5,000. 

Pursuant to Rule 7(4)(f), M.R.App.P., the appointed mediator shall serve Pro Bono 

and the mediator’s incidental expenses shall be shared equally by the parties.

and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this August 24, 2023.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Christopher W. Froines, Ben Kappelman, Alice J. Hinshaw

08/24/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0383
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5326

To provide additional security for nuclear facilities under certain 

circumstances. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2004

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To provide additional security for nuclear facilities under 

certain circumstances.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NO-FLY ZONE NEAR NUCLEAR FACILITIES 

4 UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—If the threat alert level deter6 mined by the Homeland Security Advisory System is ele7 vated to code orange or code red, the Secretary of Trans8 portation shall prohibit any commercial or private aircraft 

9 from flying below 18,000 feet within a 10-mile radius of 

10 a nuclear facility. 
2

•HR 5326 IH 

1 (b) DEFINITION.—The term ‘‘nuclear facility’’ means 

2 a commercial nuclear power reactor licensed by the Nu3 clear Regulatory Commission under the Atomic Energy 

4 Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.).

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Speaking Roses International, Inc., a Utah corporation (the"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report onForm 8-KSB of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2004 (the"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

|                                                                             | /s/ Blaine Harris |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|
| Blaine Harris, President    and Chief Executive Officer
May 21, 2004
  |
Case 3:10-cr-00571-PGS Document 21 Filed 09/22/10 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 46
Case 3:10-cr-00571-PGS Document 21 Filed 09/22/10 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 47
Case 3:10-cr-00571-PGS Document 21 Filed 09/22/10 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 48
PROB 12A 

(6/21) 

United States District Court 

for 

District of New Jersey 

Report on Individual Under Supervision

his

Name of Individual Under Supervision: Russell Fluker Cr.: 11-00447-002 

PACTS #: 57633 

Name of Sentencing Judicial Officer: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. WALLS 

Name of Assigned Judicial Officer: 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

THE HONORABLE CLAIRE C. CECCHI 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Date of Original Sentence: 11/14/2012 

Original Offense: Conspiracy to Distribute and Possess with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substance, 

in violation of 21 §§ 846, a Class A Felony.

Original Sentence: 120 months’ imprisonment, 60 months’ supervised release 

Special Conditions: Special Assessment, Financial Disclosure, Life Skills and/or Educational/Vocational 

Training, and Department of Motor Vehicle Compliance 

Type of Supervision: Supervised Release Date Supervision Commenced: 12/12/2018 

NONCOMPLIANCE SUMMARY

The individual under supervision has not complied with the following condition(s) of supervision: 

Violation Number Nature of Noncompliance 

1 “The defendant shall not commit another federal, state, or local crime 

during the term of supervision.”

On November 5, 2021, Fluker was arrested by the Newark Police Department 

and charged with Aggravated Assault for a domestic incident that occurred on 

October 6, 2021. Fluker was released on pretrial supervision by Essex County 

Prosecutor’s Office. The next scheduled court appearance is December 17, 

2021. 

U.S. Probation Officer Action: 

The Probation Office recommends no formal court action be taken at this time to investigate the arrest to 

determine if violation charges will be filed. We will continue to monitor Fluker and upon the completion 

of investigation, our office will update the Court immediately. 

Case 2:11-cr-00447-CCC Document 174 Filed 12/06/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 2868
Prob 12A – page 2 

Russell Fluker 

Respectfully submitted, 

SUSAN M. SMALLEY, Chief 

U.S. Probation Officer 

By: ERIN A. DESILVA 

U.S. Probation Officer

/ ead

APPROVED: 

Elisa Martinez 12/3/2021 

ELISA MARTINEZ Date 

Supervising U.S. Probation Officer 

Please check a box below to indicate the Court’s direction regarding action to be taken in this case:

No Formal Court Action to be Taken at This Time (as recommended by the Probation Office) 

Submit a Request for Modifying the Conditions or Term of Supervision 

Submit a Request for Warrant or Summons 

Other 

Signature of Judicial Officer 

Date 

X

12/6/2021

Case 2:11-cr-00447-CCC Document 174 Filed 12/06/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2869
----

| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in      the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |                           |   |
|---------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
| Date: March      14, 2008 | By:    | /s/ MichaelMcLaren        |   |
|                      |   | Michael McLaren                |   |
|                      |   | Principal Executive    Officer |   |
|                      |   |                           |   |
Exhibit
32.2





EXTERRAN
PARTNERS, L.P.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Exterran Partners, L.P.
(the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended September  30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
Daniel K. Schlanger, as Chief Financial Officer of Exterran GP LLC, the general
partner of the Partnership’s general partner, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to his knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





/s/ Daniel K.
Schlanger


Daniel K.
Schlanger


Chief
Financial Officer, Exterran GP LLC


As
General Partner of Exterran General Partner, L.P.


As
General Partner of Exterran Partners, L.P.




November
6, 2008





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the
Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
# cpsaat02
Case 2:11-cv-04073-JLL -MAH Document 32 Filed 01/19/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 172
Case 2:11-cv-04073-JLL -MAH Document 32 Filed 01/19/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 173
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

p0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

138302

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138302 COA: 281528 Kent CC: 07-003765-FH DERRICK DEMONES GUNN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 8, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY

, C.J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her opinion in People v Idziak , 484 Mich 549 (2009).
Ex. I

Case 2:11-cv-04586-KM-MAH Document 94-9 Filed 05/31/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 1297
Case 2:11-cv-04586-KM-MAH Document 94-9 Filed 05/31/13 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 1298
Case 2:11-cv-04586-KM-MAH Document 94-9 Filed 05/31/13 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 1299
Case 2:11-cv-04586-KM-MAH Document 94-9 Filed 05/31/13 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 1300
Case 2:11-cv-04586-KM-MAH Document 94-9 Filed 05/31/13 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 1301
. . . .

: :

**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  TEXAS **AUSTIN**?

*. i% i:

iI.

: .l t, but in ~~aaotlonod b y (r ~0x1 ostabllahed rulo

of dooi8lonr in thlr Stats aad otbst **stator,** ::uoh

aa aato of T-8 vr D.9108, 105 Tox. 95, 141)

8. 111. 3301 Bradley we TMM Liqu4r oontro1

BoErd Per. ai*. QP., 108 %4p2e&oo aennoliv, Tuar uqu4r Jon-

# 37 2. J., &n. 100, m&o 143. . . ."

or, Olr,App. 142 $a ‘il. 26 732; 

### The **CQM** 

### or c8ootta ve ui8, 28 Ire (24) 6 7 hold t&t a pwmittu h4 no mated fight in u nlo ot % pcrait, but held it cm llaitationo oreatdlby rSstut4. There 8 elty 4mot4 a ml14 oidlnmaea&moh;blt1% tha sala a1 al.ooh~Ua bormqrm rlthln 300 tsot e$ ux: ahuroh, pub110

mahoolor pabllo

horpl6al (a00 l tatutorf mthod or arsamurment ), &or the prv~im OM of -4 Arti 6&25a, V, A. Fe P. 01 ruoh oale l~em4lat.d~beoomamunlartul. Ii n a4aLrra&or ruoh M ualmdul m&o hla llou60 w4uld be oubjeol to revooationby tha T.nr Liquor **coatr41 fmta.** 

We amme rroa your latter tbhat the bulldins

mad promher darorlbod in JOW letternm **USO~** by a BOM fldo nll~l4u4 orplanitatba u 8 4bPrab. If tZ11e br true, we namer your rim puertion Sa the lfflnmtlro.

IImln~; marore jrour rlrat ?uostiw in tha aiilr111;m, it beoomor unnoeerrary to lnanef your l oro~ mwl
V a ry Wul y y ou r8 APMR NET ~OFIiZIEhL O f TEX M
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

March 28, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00565

- CV

David MORA , Texas Sterling Construction Co. a/k/a Texas Crushed Concr ete, and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. a/k/a Sterling Delaware Holding Company, Inc.

, Appellants

v.

Martin VALDIVIA Sr. and Maria Cervantes Valdivia, both Individually and as Sole Heirs of the Estate of Martin Valdivia Jr., Deceased,

Appellees

F rom the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CI09734 Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

After this court granted court reporter Amy L. Hinds ’s first

, second , and third request s for
extension s of time to file the record , the reporter’s record was due on March 9 , 201 8

.
After the extended due date, the court reporter filed a fourth notification of late record and a status report showing the number of pages that have been edited , proofread, and formatted
to date

. The court reporter requested a fourth extension of time to file the record until April 9

, 2018, for a total extension of 124 days . The court reporter stated she will complete the record by April 9. 2018.

The court reporter’s request is GRANTED. We ORDER court reporter Amy L. Hinds to
file t he reporter’s record with this court not later than April 9 , 201 8

. See id. R. 35.3(c) (limiting an extension in an ordinary appeal to thirty days). No further request s for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record will be granted.

________ _________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of March, 2018

.

___ ________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS

NEWARK DATE: November 19, 2012 

 

JUDGE: Susan D. Wigenton

 

COURT REPORTER: Carmen Liloia

 

DEPUTY CLERK: Antigone Owens-Krefski

OTHER: ______________

Title of Case: Docket # 11cr470 

 

USA v. ANDREW AUERNHEIMER 

 

Appearances:

Zach Intrater, AUSA and Michael Martinez, AUSA for the Gov’t

Tor Ekeland, Esq. and Mark Jaffe, Esq. for the Dft 

 

Nature of proceedings: Jury Trial

Timothy Glantz Sworn for Dft

R. David Hulsey Sworn for Dft

Sergey Bratus Sworn for Dft

Stipulation read into the record.

Dft rests.

Jury excused

Charge conference held on the record.

Jury trial adjourned to 11/20/12 at 9:30 a.m.

Time Commenced 9:30 a.m.

Time Adjourned 4:00 p.m.

cc: chambers Antigone Owens-Krefski

 Deputy Clerk

Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 78 Filed 11/19/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1002
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 78 Filed 11/19/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1003
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-11546 Summary Calendar

THEODORE A OSBORNE, SR

Petitioner - Appellant

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Respondent - Appellee

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:01-CV-1064-P

-------------------- June 18, 2002 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Theodore Osborne, Sr., federal prisoner # 98686-131, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he raised challenges to the jurisdiction of the Parole Commission to revoke his parole in 2001. On appeal he argues that he was denied a hearing within five years of initially being released on parole to determine whether parole should continue in accordance with now repealed 18 U.S.C. § 4211(c)(1). He also argues that the evidence at trial constructively amended hisNo. 01-11546 -2- bank-robbery charge in his indictment, that his attorney was ineffective, and that there was a double jeopardy violation resulting from his convictions of armed bank robbery and use of a firearm during the offense. Osborne’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, a double jeopardy violation, and a constructive amendment to the indictment arise under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and not 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and he has not shown that he satisfied the requirements of the savings clause to raise these claims in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 proceeding. See Pack v. Yusuff , 218 F.3d 448, 452 (5th Cir. 2000); Reyes-Requena v. United States , 243 F.3d 893, 900, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). His claim that his parole ended five years after he was initially released on parole because there was no hearing in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 4211(c)(1) to determine whether supervision should continue is without merit. See Penix v. United States Parole Comm’n. , 979 F.2d 386, 388-89 (5th Cir. 1992).
AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 3 ORDER FOR RETURN OF
vs. DEPOSIT FOR BAIL
JAISON MARTINEZ : RECOG. NEW3333
Case No. DNJX210MJ003148
3 DNdJX211CR000352

It appearing to the Court that the above-named defendant was
held in bail by the United States District Court for the District of New
Jersey for his appearance before this Court, and that the sum of Fifteen
thousand dollars ($15,000.00) was deposited in the registry of this Court
as security for the said recognizance; and it further appearing that the
purposes of said recognizance have been fulfilled and the said “st
recognizance has been duly canceled of record, it is, on this AS day
of December, 2011

ORDERED that the sum of Five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) so
deposited as aforesaid be returned to Nidelsa Gil 298 Gurside Street,
Newark, NJ 07105, Five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) be returned to
Deyanira Moya, 298 Gurside Street, Newark, NJ 07105 and the remaining
Five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) be returned to Flor Martinez, 678

Summer Avenue, Apt. 1, Newark, NJ 07104 sureties of said recognizance.

GARRETT E. BROWN, CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
ORDER GRANTING

MOTION TO SEAL

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and,

MYLAN INC, : DU1!ENT FILED ELECTRONIcALLY

Defendants,

THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court upon the Motion of

Defendants Mvlan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Mvlan Inc. (collectively, “Mylan”). pursuant to

Local Civil Rule 5.3(c). to Seal portions the following documents:

I. Portions of Defendants Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion for Leave

to File its First Amended Answer to Complaint. Separate Defenses, andCounterclaims (ECF No. 131);

2. Portions of Exhibits A and B to the Declaration of Sung W. Kim (ECF Nos. 131-1

and 13 1-2); and

3. Exhibits D. H, and K to the Declaration of Sung W. Kim in their entirety (ECF

Nos. 131-3. 131-4. and 131-5);

and the Court having considered the papers submitt d by Mylan in support of the pr sent I

(10(1 A

\lotion

and the Court having considered and adopted the Findings of

Fact and Conclusions of Lax\ submitted by M Ian in support of the present Motion: and the

Cvurt haing furthr found that the standards of Local Cii1 Role 5 3(c(2) ba\e been mci and

Oil (5 flo_ L

ii ol u tluLntoI 1 ii ri il on r’c

J V

and for other and cuod cause bovine been shown;
ppo

t o

its Motion for Leave

to File its First Amended Answer to Complaint. Separate Defenses, and

Counterclaims (EC[ No, 131 ):

2. Portions of Exhibits A and B to the Declaration of Sung W. Kim (ECF Nos. 131-1

and 131-2); and

3. Exhibits D.and K to the Declaration of Sung W. Kim in their entirety (ECF

os. ui-i. foi-+. and ai-;

is hereby GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that the documents set fbrth above that were electronically filed with the

ORDERED that Mvlan shall electronically file on ti e

art\H;; w

Court shall be sealed and maintained under seal by the Court;

and it is further A frz> t,‘

docke’t public copies ofe

HONO IS H. MAN

UNITED STATES MAGISYRATE JUDGE

(1-lu I KoutC 226u6 I