alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Veraz Networks, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) for the purpose of
complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350).

Douglas A. Sabella, the Chief Executive Officer, and Albert J. Wood, the Chief Financial Officer of Veraz Networks, Inc., each hereby
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the
undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 16th day of November, 2009.



|                        |  |        |  |                                                   
|----------------------- |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 16, 2009 |  | By:    |  | /s/    Douglas A. Sabella                         
|                        |  | Name:  |  | Douglas A. Sabella                                
|                        |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer                           
|                        |  |        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                     
|                        |  |       
|                        |  | By:    |  | /s/    Albert J. Wood                             
|                        |  | Name:  |  | Albert J. Wood                                    
|                        |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer                           
|                        |  |        |  | (Principal Financial and Chief Accounting Officer)

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Veraz Networks, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the
date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 135 (Thursday, July 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34579-34580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16961]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Meetings; Sunshine Act

Agency Holding the Meeting:  Federal Maritime Commission.

[[Page 34580]]

    Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 74 FR 32934 
(July 9, 2009)

Previously Announced Time and Date of the Meeting:  July 14, 2009--10 
a.m.

Change: Withdrawal of Item 3 in the Closed Session.

Contact Person For More Information:  Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, 
(202) 523-5725.

Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-16961 Filed 7-14-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE P
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5356 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5356

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the placement in a 
national cemetery of memorial markers for the purpose of commemorating 
   servicemembers or other persons whose remains are interred in an 
             American Battle Monuments Commission cemetery.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 9, 2004

 Mr. Langevin (for himself, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, 
Mr. Grijalva, and Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the placement in a 
national cemetery of memorial markers for the purpose of commemorating 
   servicemembers or other persons whose remains are interred in an 
             American Battle Monuments Commission cemetery.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF INTERNMENT OF REMAINS IN AN AMERICAN BATTLE 
              MONUMENTS COMMISSION CEMETERY AS UNAVAILABLE FOR THE 
              PURPOSES OF PLACEMENT OF MEMORIAL MARKERS IN NATIONAL 
              CEMETERIES.

    Paragraph (3) of section 2306(b) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (C);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (D) 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(E) are interred in an American Battle Monuments 
        Commission cemetery.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Orchid Cellmark Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report for the year ended
December 31, 2009 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                                                                                                       
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:    March 12, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/    THOMAS A. BOLOGNA                                                                              
|                         |  |  |  | Thomas A. Bologna President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)                 
|                         |  | 
|Dated:    March 12, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/    JAMES F. SMITH                                                                                 
|                         |  |  |  | James F. Smith Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_______ _______ __________ No. ACM 39006

_______ _______ __________ UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Todd M. G ETZ Staff Sergeant (E

- 5 )
, U.S. Air Force, Appellant

_______ _______ __________ Appeal from the United S tates Air Force Trial Judiciary
Decided 22 February 2017

_______ _______ __________ Military Judge: Donald R. Eller (arraignment); Natalie D

. Richardson. Approved sentence: Dishonorable discharge, confinement for 6 years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, 1 and reduction to E

- 1. Sentence adjudged 11 November 2015 by GCM convened at Aviano Air Base
, Italy

. For Appellant: Major Mark C. Bruegger, USAF , and Captain Kevin R. C ayton , USAF. For Appellee: Major Jeremy D. Gehman, USAF, and Gerald R. Bruce
, Esquire

. Before MAYBERRY
, SPERANZA , and JOHNSON
, Appellate Military Judges

.

________________________ This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

_______ _______ __________

1 In accordance with a pretrial agreement and for the benefit of Appellant’s family, theconvening authority deferred the adjudged forfeitures until action and waived mandatory forfeitures for a period of six months, App ellant’s release from confinement, or the expiration of Appellant’s term of service, whichever was less.United States v. Getz , No. ACM 39006

2 PE R CURIAM :The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant ’ s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

KURT J. BRUBAKER Clerk of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Crim. No. 11-352 (FSH)

 

v. : O R D E R

FRANKLIN RAUL SALAZAR-MARTINEZ : 

Defendant. :

This matter having come before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge filed in this matter, which was submitted as a result of this Court having

referred this cause to the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of conducting a plea proceeding under

Fed. R. Crim. P. 11; and the defendant having consented to the Magistrate Judge conducting the

guilty plea proceeding; and the Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as

the transcript of the proceedings on November 22, 2011 and there being no objection to the Report

and Recommendation timely filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b); and the Court finding the Report

and Recommendation is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law; and the Court hereby finding

that the Report and Recommendation should be approved and adopted and the defendant’s guilty

plea accepted,

IT IS ON THIS 21 day of December, 2011, st

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is

approved and adopted; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant’s guilty plea is accepted and a judgment

of guilt to Count One of the Information shall be entered. 

 s/ Faith S. Hochberg 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:11-cr-00352-MCA Document 54 Filed 12/21/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 139
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Perry Foy, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 890]

“Utilization of the risk assessment instrument will generally result in the proper classification in most cases so that departures will be the exception not the rule ... A departure from the presumptive risk level is warranted where there exists an aggravating or mitigating factor of a kind or to a degree not otherwise adequately taken into account by the guidelines” *(People v O’Neal,*26 AD3d 365, 365 [2006]). There must be clear and convincing evidence of the existence of a special circumstance to warrant a departure *(see People v Dexter,*21 AD3d 403 [2005]).

Here, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the request for a downward departure based upon the defendant’s contention that his conviction was for statutory rape, as opposed to forcible rape. This factor was already taken into account in the risk assessment instrument, as indicated by the failure to assess points therein for the use of force *(see People v Walker,*47 AD3d 692 [2008]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Rivera, J.P., Lifson, Florio and Chambers, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Simula, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John A. Jenson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                        
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company for the periods presented.




| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ John A. Jenson     
| |                        
| | John A. Jenson         
| | Chief Financial Officer
| | November 5, 2003
Table 25. Wives who earn more than their husbands, 1987-2006

(Numbers in thousands)

Married-couple 

families in which 

wife (but not 

necessarily 

husband) had 

earnings from 

work

Wives who earn

more than 

their 

husbands 1

Percent of wives

who earn more 

than their 

husbands 1

Married-couple 

families in which 

both wife and 

husband had 

earnings from 

work

Wives who earn

more than 

their

husbands 2

Percent of wives

who earn more 

than their 

husbands 2

1987.................. 32,025 7,581 23.7 29,755 5,311 17.8

1988.................. 32,810 7,827 23.9 30,503 5,520 18.1

1989.................. 33,119 8,068 24.4 30,848 5,796 18.8

1990.................. 33,093 8,221 24.8 30,794 5,923 19.2

1991.................. 33,516 8,983 26.8 30,998 6,465 20.9

1992.................. 33,987 9,715 28.6 31,221 6,948 22.3

1993.................. 34,286 10,000 29.2 31,264 6,978 22.3

1994.................. 35,066 10,184 29.0 32,091 7,209 22.5

1995.................. 34,819 9,822 28.2 32,030 7,033 22.0

1996.................. 35,120 10,070 28.7 32,389 7,340 22.7

1997.................. 35,613 10,309 28.9 32,745 7,441 22.7

1998.................. 35,806 10,467 29.2 32,782 7,443 22.7

1999.................. 36,454 10,548 28.9 33,340 7,434 22.3

2000.................. 37,037 11,070 29.9 33,873 7,906 23.3

2001.................. 36,864 11,329 30.7 33,665 8,130 24.1

2002.................. 36,905 11,765 31.9 33,531 8,391 25.0

2003.................. 36,761 11,923 32.4 33,189 8,351 25.2

2004.................. 36,710 11,985 32.6 33,110 8,386 25.3

2005.................. 37,055 12,215 33.0 33,364 8,524 25.5

2006.................. 37,733 12,601 33.4 33,838 8,707 25.7

Year

Families in which wives have earnings 

but husbands may not

Families in which both wives and husbands 

have earnings

1 Includes families in which husband had no earnings

from work. 2 Excludes families in which husband had no earnings

from work.

NOTE: These data, collected in the Annual Social

and Economic Supplement, reflect the earnings and work

experience of the entire year. 

SOURCE: Annual Social and Economic

Supplements, 1988-2007, Current Population Survey,

U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor

Statistics.

78
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of PRIMEDIA Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles J. Stubbs, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/ CHARLES J. STUBBS                
|Charles J. Stubbs,                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer

May 2, 2011

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1175 

KA 12-01266 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, FAHEY, CARNI, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TAJENEE J., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (NICHOLAS P. DIFONZO OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. HILLERY

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an adjudication of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M.

William Boller, A.J.), rendered June 8, 2012. The adjudication

revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the adjudication so appealed from is

unanimously modified on the law by directing that all of the sentences

shall run concurrently with respect to each other and as modified the

adjudication is affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant was adjudicated a youthful offender on

January 6, 2012 and was sentenced to, inter alia, concurrent terms of

five years of probation with respect to the three crimes of which he

was convicted. Defendant subsequently admitted that he had violated

the conditions of his probation, and he now appeals from an

adjudication that revoked his probation and sentenced him to three

terms of incarceration of 1a to 4 years, two of which were ordered to

run consecutively to each other. Defendant’s sentence thus aggregates

to a term of incarceration of 2b to 8 years, and we agree with

defendant that the sentence is illegal. “[H]aving adjudicated

defendant a youthful offender, [Supreme C]ourt was without authority

to impose consecutive sentences in excess of four years” (People v

Jorge N.T., 70 AD3d 1456, 1458, lv denied 14 NY3d 889 [internal

quotation marks omitted]; see People v Cory T., 59 AD3d 1063, 1064). 

We therefore modify the adjudication by directing that all of the

sentences shall run concurrently with respect to each other (see

People v Christopher T., 48 AD3d 1131, 1131-1132). The sentence as

modified is not unduly harsh or severe. 

Entered: November 15, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2013

s0722 

# Order

Clerk July 30, 2013

146543

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146543

COA: 310175

Berrien CC: 2009

- 015597

- FC

2009

- 015572

- FC

ANDRE MAURICE FRANCE

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 27 , 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                         5
<MULTIPLIER>                                               1    
       
                                                   
<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                  Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                                     Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                       Sep-30-1997

<CASH>                                                      5,905,082
<SECURITIES>                                                1,501,607
<RECEIVABLES>                                              30,099,707
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                 3,339,088
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           24,514,434
<PP&E>                                                     98,058,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                            (18,400,374)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            173,041,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      85,293,333
<BONDS>                                                    61,043,858
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                      105,421
<OTHER-SE>                                                 12,981,238
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              173,041,077
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          292,287,264
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             291,113,536
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           (2,657,403)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          3,806,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                24,213
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            24,213
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   24,213
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0
        
 

</TABLE>
#### J. C. SPACH WAGON WORKS, Inc. v. UNION PASTE CO. GLOBE PARLOR FURNITURE CO. v. UNION PASTE CO.

Civ. Nos. 8742, 8743.

United States District Court D. Massachusetts.

Feb. 17, 1950.

Dallace McLennan, Winston-Salem, N. C., Julius C. Smith, C. H. Wharton, Armi-stead W. Sapp, Beverly C. Moore, McNeill Smith, Richard L. Wharton, all of the firm of Smith, Wharton, Sapp & Moore, Greensboro, N. C., Alfred Gardner, Boston, Mass., for J. C. Spach Wagon Works, Inc.

Dallace McLennan, Winston-Salem, N. C., Armistead W. Sapp, McNeill Smith, Richard L. Wharton, all of the firm of Smith, Wharton, Sapp, & Moore, Greensboro, N. C., Alfred"Gardner, Boston, Mass., for Globe Parlor Furniture Co.

Joseph W. Worthen, Erland B. Cook, Boston, Mass., Leon F. Sargent, Powers *&*Hall, Boston, Mass., for defendants.

SWEENEY, Chief Judge.

The plaintiffs’ oral motion to hold these actions in abeyance pending the determination of a similar action in North Carolina is denied. In the Carolina action there- are many defendants, whereas in these the defendant is sued alone. The motion is therefore denied without prejudice to its renewal after the hearing on the defendant’s contractual relationship has been determined.

The defendant’s motion for a separate trial of the issue of whether or not there was any contractual relationship between the plaintiffs and the defendant is allowed under the authority of Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.SlC.A. This ought to be a comparatively simple issue to try as distinguished from a trial on the merits.