alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Michael Vardakis, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report (the Report) on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:7/31/07By:/s/Michael VardakisMichael VardakisPresident and Director
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the quarterly report of ThermoEnergy Corporation (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof


(the
      “Report"), I, Dennis C. Cossey, President of the Company, certify to the best
      of
      my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      August 21, 2006





By:
      /s/
      Dennis C. Cossey


-
      ----------------------------------------


Name:
      Dennis C. Cossey,


Title:
      President
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-50053

 

DONALD BENALLY,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

J.E. SLADE, Warden, Federal

Correctional Institution

La Tuna; O. IVAN WHITE, 

Regional Director - 

United States Bureau of

Prisons,

Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-97-CV-418-H

- - - - - - - - - -

August 19, 1998

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Donald Benally, federal prisoner # 26826-008, argues that

the district court erred in denying his § 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas

petition alleging that the respondents have refused to

recalculate his sentence under the pre-Sentencing Guidelines law.

We have reviewed Benally’s petition and have determined that

Benally is challenging the validity of the district court’s 
No. 98-50053

-2-

imposition of his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines rather

than the manner in which his sentence is being executed. 

Therefore, Benally’s “petition” should have been construed as a

motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See Cox v. Warden,

Fed. Detention Ctr., 911 F.2d 1111, 1113-15 (5th Cir. 1990).

Because a § 2255 motion requires a certificate of

appealability (COA) to be eligible for appellate review, the

court would generally remand the case to the district court for

the limited purpose of determining whether a COA should issue. 

See United States v. Youngblood, 116 F.3d 1113, 1114-15 (5th Cir.

1997).

However, a § 2255 motion must be presented to the sentencing

court for determination. See § 2255. Benally was sentenced by

the district court in Phoenix, Arizona, which is located in the

Ninth Circuit. Because neither the Texas district court nor this

court has jurisdiction to address Benally’s motion, Benally’s

appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Benally’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is

DENIED as moot.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Healthcare
      Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      Steven Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
                Steven WangSteven
                Wang, Chief Financial OfficerAugust
                12, 2008
# cpsaat01
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5016

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2004

Received 

AN ACT

To extend the water service contract for the Ainsworth Unit, 

Sandhills Division, Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program, 

Nebraska.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 5016 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. AINSWORTH UNIT, SANDHILLS DIVISION, PICK2 SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

4 extend for the period described in subsection (b) the water 

5 service contract for the Ainsworth Unit, Sandhills Divi6 sion, Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program, Nebraska, con7 sisting of—

8 (1) the water service contract entered into by 

9 the Secretary of the Interior under—

10 (A) section 9(e) of the Reclamation Project 

11 Act of 1939 (43 U.S.C. 485h(e)); 

12 (B) section 9(c) of the Act of December 

13 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887, chapter 665); 

14 (C) the Act of August 21, 1954 (68 Stat. 

15 757, chapter 781); and 

16 (D) the Act of May 18, 1956 (70 Stat. 

17 160, chapter 285); and 

18 (2) the water service contract for the set project 

19 located in Cherry, Brown, and Rock Counties, Ne20 braska, for the use of a part of the waters of the 

21 Snake River, a tributary of the Niobrara River. 

22 (b) PERIOD OF EXTENSION.—The water service con23 tract described in subsection (a) shall be extended for 4 

24 years after the date on which the contract expires under 
3

HR 5016 RDS 

1 the water service contract and law in existence before the 

2 date of enactment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
###### **EXHIBIT32.2**

###### ** **

Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd.

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Alpha ProTech, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Lloyd Hoffman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| DATE:  | **October 28, 2009** | ** ** | BY:    | /s/**Lloyd  Hoffman**   |
|--------|---------------------------|------------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |                      |       |   |                    |
|   |                      |       |   | Lloyd Hoffman           |
|   |                      |       |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
1

Codrut Radu Radulescu Attorney At Law

65 Longview St. Phone: 973 536 2608

West Orange, New Jersey 07052 email: radu@synclabs.com

Honorable Madeline Cox Arleo

M.L. King , Jr., Federal Building & Courthouse

50 Walnut Street

Newark, New Jersey 07103

RE: Sync Labs v. Fusion Manufacturing

Civ. Action no. 11-cv-03671 (WHW)(MCA)

Dear Judge Arleo,

You Honor scheduled for June 7th at 2 PM the oral arguments concerning the motion to 

disqualify attorney filed by the Defendants Fusion Manufacturing and Michael Ferchak. I am 

respectfully requesting a projector for my visual presentation and a time slot to test the 

equipment with my laptop.

Respectfully submitted,

Codru Radu Radulescu, Esq Date :June 5th, 2012

/s Codrut Radu Radulescu 

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Cc: Christopher W. Hager ( via ECF)

Case 2:11-cv-03671-WHW-MCA Document 36 Filed 06/05/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 499
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6730

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. JAMES PRESTON FRYE, a/k/a Jamie Frye, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:01-cr-00167-JRS-1)

Submitted: March 25, 2009 Decided: April 3, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Preston Frye, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Ronald Hood, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Preston Frye appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Frye , No. 3:01-cr00167-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Chart 4-7. Earnings of blacks and Hispanics are lower than 

those of Asians and whites

NOTE: Earnings are median weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers. Earnings data have been adjusted using the 

CPI-U-RS research series. Persons whose ethnicity is identified as Hispanic or Latino may be of any race. Data for Asians only 

available since 2000.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

$400

$450

$500

$550

$600

$650

$700

$750

$800

$850

1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006

$400

$450

$500

$550

$600

$650

$700

$750

$800

$850

White

Hispanic or Latino

Black or African American

Asian

Median weekly earnings of full-time workers (In constant 2006 dollars)

Chart 4-7. Earnings of blacks and Hispanics are lower than 

those of Asians and whites

• The median usual weekly earnings for full-time wage and salary workers are 

higher for Asians and whites than for blacks and Hispanics.

• In 2006, median weekly earnings of white workers were $690, compared with 

$554 for blacks and $486 for Hispanic workers. Asians earned $784 per week.
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of USA Video Interactive Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anton J. Drescher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   By: /s/Anton J. Drescher Anton J. Drescher, Chief Financial Officer March 31st, 2010
JAN-21-2014 TUE 08:45 AN FAX NO. P, 02/03

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ; Hon, Douglas B. Arpert:
v. : Mag. No. 11-2525 (DEA)
DAVID WAX and : ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE

JUDY WAX

This matter ttt ving come before the Court on the joint application of Paul J.
Fishman, United States Arter icy for the District of New Jersey (R. Joseph Gribko, Assistant U.S.
Attorney, appearing), and diiandants David Wax and Judy Wax (Mitchel! J. Ansell, Esq. and
Steven Secare, Esq., appear rg), for an order granting a continuance of the proceedings in the
above-captioned matter, anc! ‘he defendants and their counsel being aware that an Information or
Indictment ordinarily must he filed within thirty (30) days of defendamt's initial appearance on this
charge, pursuant to Title 18, | nited States Code, Section 3161(b); and, pursuant to Title 18, United
States Code, Section 3161(t) 7)(A), the United States and the defendants having requested this
continuance so that the partic .can negotiate plea agreements and thereby avoid a possible trial;

atk

ITS on this 0) ~ day of sanuary, 2014,

and for good cause shown;

ORDERED th 't the time from the date this Order is entered, to and including
February 28, 2014, shall be «: cluded in caleulating the time within which an Information or
Indictment must be filed uncl¢r the Speedy Trial Act for the following reasons:

1, Both 1b? United States and the defendants desire time to discuss plea
negotiations, which would rer der any grand jury proceedings and any subsequent trial of this

matter unnecessary;


JAN-21-2014 TUE 08:44 AM FAX NO, P, 03

2. Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), the ends of
justice served by granting the continuance outwei igh the best interest of the public and the

defendants in a speedy trial,

HON. DOUGLAS E. ARPERT
United States Magistrate Judge

AL, ~

VX Joseph Gribko
Assistant United States Attorney

Mitchell Ansell, Esq.
Counsel for Defendant David Wax

Steven Sceare, Esq.
Counsel for defendant Judy Wax


JAN-21-2014 TUE 08:45 Al FAX NO. P, 03/03

2. Pursa-nt to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), the ends of

Justice served by granting ti - continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendants in a speedy trial,

HON. DOUGLAS E. ARPERT
United States Magistrate Judge

K. Joseph Gribko
Assistant United States Attor iey

Mitchell Ansell, Esq.
Counsel for Defendant David Wax

oY

Steven Setare, Esq.
Counsel for defendant Judy ¥ ‘ax
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Matritech, Inc. (the registrant):2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be
designed under our
supervision, to ensure that
material information relating
to the registrant, including
its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those
entities, particularly during
the period in which this
report is being prepared;b.
    
    [Paragraph omitted in
accordance with SEC
transition instructions
contained in SEC Release
33-8238 and 34-47986.]c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness
of the registrants
disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this
report based on such
evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrants
internal control over
financial reporting that
occurred during the
registrants second fiscal
quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal
control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of
internal controls over
financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to
adversely affect the
registrants ability to
record, process, summarize
and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves
management or other employees
who have a significant role
in the registrants internal
controls over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 10, 2006/s/ Richard A. SandbergRichard A. SandbergChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-QSB of DirectView, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the three months ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Perry,
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/ Michael Perry
Michael Perry
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
May 17, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5167 

To extend for 18 months the period for which chapter 12 of title 11 of 

the United States Code is reenacted. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2004 

Ms. BALDWIN (for herself, Mr. SMITH of Michigan, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. OTTER, Mr. GORDON, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. ETHERIDGE, Mr. 

LAHOOD, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, and Ms. 

KAPTUR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To extend for 18 months the period for which chapter 12 

of title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protection of Family 

5 Farmers Act of 2004’’. 
2 

•HR 5167 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EIGHTEEN-MONTH EXTENSION OF PERIOD FOR 

2 WHICH CHAPTER 12 OF TITLE 11, UNITED 

3 STATES CODE, IS REENACTED. 

4 (a) AMENDMENTS.—Section 149 of title I of division 

5 C of Public Law 105–277 (11 U.S.C. 1201 note) is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘January 1, 2004’’ each place 

8 it appears and inserting ‘‘July 1, 2005’’; and 

9 (2) in subsection (a)— 

10 (A) by striking ‘‘June 30, 2003’’ and in11 serting ‘‘December 31, 2003’’; and 

12 (B) by striking ‘‘July 1, 2003’’ and insert13 ing ‘‘January 1, 2004’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 subsection (a) take effect on January 1, 2004. 

Æ