alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JARVIS JACKSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D23-140

[June 29, 2023]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 from the Circuit Court for the 

Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Daliah H. Weiss, Judge;

L.T. Case No. 502009CF001912A.

Andrea Flynn Mogensen of Law Office Andrea Flynn Mogensen, PA,

Sarasota, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

FORST, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**EXHIBIT 99.2**
**CERTIFICATION BY THE****CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER RELATING TO A PERIODICREPORT****CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS**
I, John O’Keefe, Chief Financial Officer, ofIvanhoe Energy Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(a) the Company’s periodic report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the“Form 10-K”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and related interpretations; and
(b) the information contained in theForm 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
* * *
By: /s/ JOHN O’KEEFE    John O’KeefeChief Financial Officer
Date:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 621 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 621

    To amend the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940 to 
  prohibit discrimination in the rental of housing to members of the 
                             Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2003

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940 to 
  prohibit discrimination in the rental of housing to members of the 
                             Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON DISCRIMINTATION IN THE RENTAL OF HOUSING TO 
              MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    Section 300 of the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940 
(50 U.S.C. App. 530) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(e) Whoever knowingly discriminates against a person in the 
military service in the rental of a dwelling because of the person's 
status as a person in the military service, or attempts to do so, shall 
be fined as provided in title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned for 
not to exceed one year, or both.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

Form of Section 906 Certification

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Pacific Medical, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Brant Dees, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/ Brant Dees

Brant Dees

Chief Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer

Date: December 24, 2002
[No. 53964-7-I.

Division One.

November 28, 2005.]

#### Mikel Hernandez et al., *Appellants,*v. Kim Brady Carpenter, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-2-12084-9, Michael S. Spearman, J., entered February 19, 2004. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Schindler, J., concurred in by Appelwick, A.C.J., and Becker, J.
# Employment research series

https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpspopsm.pdf
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4945

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an incentive for 

expanding employment in rural areas by allowing employers the work 

opportunity credit for hiring residents of rural areas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2004

Mr. HAYES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an incentive for expanding employment in rural areas 

by allowing employers the work opportunity credit for 

hiring residents of rural areas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Economic Devel5 opment and Opportunities Act of 2004’’. 
2

•HR 4945 IH 

1 SEC. 2. WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT TO APPLY TO NEW 

2 EMPLOYEES WHO ARE RESIDENTS OF RURAL 

3 AREAS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 51(d) of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining members of 

6 targeted groups) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end 

7 of subparagraph (G), by striking the period at the end 

8 of subparagraph (H) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by adding 

9 at the end the following new subparagraph: 

10 ‘‘(I) a rural area resident.’’

11 (b) RURAL AREA RESIDENT.—Subsection (d) of sec12 tion 51 of such Code is amended by redesignating para13 graphs (10) through (12) as paragraphs (11) through 

14 (13), respectively, and by inserting after paragraph (9) the 

15 following new paragraph: 

16 ‘‘(10) RURAL AREA RESIDENT.—

17 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘rural area 

18 resident’ means, with respect to any period, any 

19 employee of the employer if—

20 ‘‘(i) substantially all of the services 

21 performed during such period by such em22 ployee for such employer are performed 

23 within an area determined by the Secretary 

24 of Agriculture to be a rural area, and 
3

•HR 4945 IH 

1 ‘‘(ii) the principal place of abode of 

2 such employee while performing such serv3 ices is within such an area. 

4 ‘‘(B) TERMINATION.—Such term shall not 

5 include any individual who begins work for the 

6 employer after the date which is 5 years after 

7 the date of the enactment of this paragraph.’’

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for 

10 the employer after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Table 35. Multiple jobholders and multiple jobholding rates by sex and race, May of selected years, 

1970-2008, not seasonally adjusted

(Numbers in thousands)

Multiple jobholders

Number

Percent of 

all multiple 

jobholders

1970........ 78,358 4,048 636 15.7 3,412 5.2 2.2 7.0 5.3 4.4 

1971......... 78,708 4,035 765 19.0 3,270 5.1 2.6 6.7 5.3 3.8 

1972......... 81,224 3,770 735 19.5 3,035 4.6 2.4 6.0 4.8 3.7 

1973....... 83,758 4,262 869 20.4 3,393 5.1 2.7 6.6 5.1 4.7 

1974......... 85,786 3,889 867 22.3 3,022 4.5 2.6 5.8 4.6 3.8 

1975......... 84,146 3,918 956 24.4 2,962 4.7 2.9 5.8 4.8 3.7 

1976....... 87,278 3,948 911 23.1 3,037 4.5 2.6 5.8 4.7 2.8 

1977......... 90,482 4,558 1,241 27.2 3,317 5.0 3.4 6.2 5.3 2.6 

1978......... 93,904 4,493 1,281 28.5 3,212 4.8 3.3 5.8 5.0 3.1 

1979....... 96,327 4,724 1,407 29.8 3,317 4.9 3.5 5.9 5.1 3.0 

1980......... 96,809 4,759 1,549 32.5 3,210 4.9 3.8 5.8 5.1 3.2 

1985......... 106,878 5,730 2,192 38.3 3,537 5.4 4.7 5.9 5.7 3.2 

1989......... 117,084 7,225 3,109 43.0 4,115 6.2 5.9 6.4 6.5 4.3 

1991........ 116,626 7,183 3,129 43.6 4,054 6.2 5.9 6.4 6.4 4.9 

1994........ 122,946 7,316 3,343 45.7 3,973 6.0 5.9 6.0 6.1 4.9 

1995....... 124,554 7,952 3,727 46.9 4,225 6.4 6.5 6.3 6.6 5.2 

1996........ 126,391 7,846 3,494 44.5 4,352 6.2 6.0 6.4 6.4 5.1 

1997........ 129,565 8,197 3,800 46.4 4,398 6.3 6.4 6.3 6.5 5.7 

1998........ 131,476 8,126 3,688 45.4 4,438 6.2 6.1 6.3 6.3 5.5 

1999........ 133,411 7,895 3,778 47.9 4,117 5.9 6.1 5.8 6.0 5.5 

2000........ 136,685 7,751 3,667 47.3 4,084 5.7 5.8 5.6 5.9 4.9 

2001........ 137,121 7,540 3,626 48.1 3,914 5.5 5.7 5.3 5.6 5.3 

2002........ 136,559 7,247 3,511 48.4 3,736 5.3 5.5 5.1 5.5 4.7 

2003........ 137,567 7,338 3,498 47.7 3,841 5.3 5.4 5.3 5.5 4.3 

2004........ 138,867 7,258 3,605 49.7 3,653 5.2 5.6 4.9 5.3 5.1 

2005.........141,730 6,895 3,402 49.3 3,493 4.9 5.2 4.6 5.4 4.4 

2006.........144,041 7,641 3,778 49.4 3,863 5.3 5.7 5.0 5.3 5.4 

2007.........145,864 7,693 3,858 50.1 3,835 5.3 5.7 4.9 5.5 4.4 

2008.........145,927 7,653 3,812 49.8 3,842 5.2 5.6 4.9 5.4 4.9 

White

Black or 

African 

American 2

Year Total 

employed

Multiple jobholding rate1

Total

Women

Men Total Women Men

1 Multiple jobholders as a percent of all employed

persons in specified group.

2 Data for years prior to 1977 refer to the black-andother population group.

NOTE: Data beginning in 1994 are not strictly

comparable with data for prior years. For an explanation, 

see the Historical Comparability documentation provided

at http://www.bls.gov/cps/eetech_methods.pdf.

Comprehensive surveys of multiple jobholders were not

conducted in 1981-84, 1986-88, 1990, and 1992-93.

SOURCE: Current Population Survey, U.S.

Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

90
|   | 1. | I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Chanticleer Holdings, Inc. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Attached to this certification is Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, a periodic report (the “periodic report”) filed by the issuer with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), which contains financial statements. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3 | I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: |
|--------|---|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | The periodic report containing the financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | The information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer for the periods presented. |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| April 1, 2011 | /s/ Michael D. Pruitt              |   |
|---------------|------------------------------------|--------|
|          | Michael D. Pruitt                  |
|          | President, Chief Executive Officer |
|          | and Chief Financial Officer        |

----
Order filed March 4, 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 11

- 00046

- CV

____________ FIVE STAR RECONSTRUC TORS, G.V. INC. , Appellant

V. GRAYCO BUILDERS, LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County, Te xas Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 72279



### O R D E R
On February 24, 2011, this court abated this appeal because Five Star Reconstructors, GV, Inc. petitioned for voluntary bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, un der cause number 11

- 31130. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2.
Through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system, the court has learned that the bankruptcy case was closed January 15, 2014

. The parties failed to advise this court of the bankruptc y court action.2

Unless within 20 days of the date of this order, any party to the appeal files a motion demonstrating good cause to retain this appeal, this appeal will be reinstated and dismissed for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 16 Filed 11/04/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 332
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 16 Filed 11/04/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 333
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 16 Filed 11/04/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 334
Presidential Documents

35763 

Federal Register 

Vol. 74, No. 138 

Tuesday, July 21, 2009 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of July 16, 2009 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect To the 

Former Liberian Regime of Charles Taylor 

On July 22, 2004, by Executive Order 13348, the President declared a national 

emergency and ordered related measures, including the blocking of the 

property of certain persons connected to the former Liberian regime of 

Charles Taylor, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers 

Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706). The President took this action to deal with 

the unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the United 

States constituted by the actions and policies of former Liberian President 

Charles Taylor and other persons, in particular their unlawful depletion 

of Liberian resources and their removal from Liberia and secreting of Liberian 

funds and property, which have undermined Liberia’s transition to democracy and the orderly development of its political, administrative, and economic institutions and resources. The President further noted that the Comprehensive Peace Agreement signed on August 18, 2003, and the related 

cease-fire had not yet been universally implemented throughout Liberia, 

and that the illicit trade in round logs and timber products was linked 

to the proliferation of and trafficking in illegal arms, which perpetuated 

the Liberian conflict and fueled and exacerbated other conflicts throughout 

West Africa. 

The actions and policies of Charles Taylor and others have left a legacy 

of destruction that continues to undermine Liberia’s transformation and 

recovery. Because the actions and policies of these persons continue to 

pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the United 

States, the national emergency declared on July 22, 2004, and the measures 

adopted on that date to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect 

beyond July 22, 2009. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the 

National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year 

the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13348. 


cprice-sewell on DSK89S0YB1PROD with RULES
35764 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 21, 2009 / Presidential Documents 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

July 16, 2009. [FR Doc. E9–17373 

Filed 7–20–09; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–W9–P 


cprice-sewell on DSK89S0YB1PROD with RULESOB#1.EPS</GPH>
exhibit_4-2.htm










Exhibit 4.2


 


This ADDENDUM TO SERVICES AGREEMENT is entered into on May 23, 2012 between ELRON ELECTRONIC INDUSTRIES LTD., a public company incorporated and existing under the laws of the State of Israel (“Elron”) and DISCOUNT INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD., a public company incorporated and existing under the laws of the State of Israel (“DIC”).


 



	
WHEREAS

	
Elron and DIC are parties to a Services Agreement dated as of March 19, 2009 with respect to the provision of certain managerial and administrative services by DIC to Elron, the term of which is three years lapsing on April 30, 2012 (the "Agreement"); and







 



	
WHEREAS

	
Elron and DIC wish to extend the term of the Agreement and revise the amount of the fee for such services to be payable under the Agreement in respect of such extended term;







 


NOW THEREFORE THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:


 



	
1.

	
The term of the Agreement is extended by a period of three consecutive years ending on April 30, 2015 (the "Extended Period").







 



	
2.

	
All the provisions of the Agreement shall apply with respect to the Extended Period as well, except that for the purpose of Section 9 of the Agreement applying in respect of the Extended Period the Fee shall be in the amount of NIS 5,900,000 per annum and the Basic Index shall be the Index for November 2011 as published on December 15, 2011.







 



	
3.

	
This Addendum is effective as of May 1, 2012.







 



	
4.

	
This Addendum forms an integral part of the Agreement.







 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT:


 



	
________________________________

	
______________________________________


	
ELRON ELECTRONIC INDUSTRIES LTD.

	
DISCOUNT INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130678 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130678 

 COA: 264524 

Kent CC: 00-011090-FC 

NGUYEN NGODTU CHU,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 3, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0619 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2006 

Clerk
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lloyd Hoffman Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 10 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934: and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| DATE:  | **  January 16,  2009** |   | BY:                     | /s/ Lloyd Hoffman |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|-------------------|
|   |                                   |   |                    |
|   |                                   |   |                    |
|   |                                   |   | Lloyd Hoffman           |
|   |                                   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                        Valley Community Bancshares, Inc.

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

David H. Brown, Chief Executive Officer and Joseph E. Riordan, Chief Financial
Officer of Valley Community Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company"), each certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

1.       the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
         "Form 10-K"), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
         and

2.       the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: March 8, 2004

                                             By: /s/ David H. Brown
                                                 ---------------------------
                                                 David H. Brown
                                                 President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

                                             By: /s/ Joseph E. Riordan
                                                 ---------------------------
                                                 Joseph E. Riordan
                                                 Executive Vice President and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer