alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5364

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

5505 Stevens Way in San Diego, California, as the ‘‘Earl B. Gilliam/

Imperial Avenue Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2004

Mr. FILNER (for himself, Mr. BACA, Mr. BECERRA, Mr. BERMAN, Mrs. BONO, 

Mr. CALVERT, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. CARDOZA, Mr. COX, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, 

Mr. DOOLEY of California, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. DOOLITTLE, 

Mr. DREIER, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. FARR, Mr. GALLEGLY, Ms. HARMAN, Mr. 

HERGER, Mr. HONDA, Mr. ISSA, Mr. LANTOS, Ms. LEE, Mr. LEWIS of 

California, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. MCKEON, Ms. MILLENDERMCDONALD, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. 

NUNES, Mr. OSE, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. POMBO, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. 

ROHRABACHER, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. ROYCE, Ms. LINDA T. 

SA ́NCHEZ of California, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. 

SCHIFF, Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. SOLIS, Mr. STARK, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. 

THOMAS, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. WAXMAN, Ms. WATERS, Ms. 

WATSON, and Ms. WOOLSEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 5505 Stevens Way in San Diego, California, 

as the ‘‘Earl B. Gilliam/Imperial Avenue Post Office 

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5364 IH 

1 SECTION 1. EARL B. GILLIAM/IMPERIAL AVENUE POST OF2 FICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 5505 Stevens Way in San Diego, 

5 California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Earl 

6 B. Gilliam/Imperial Avenue Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the Earl B. Gilliam/Impe11 rial Avenue Post Office Building.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7018
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES NEAL, III, a/k/a Sonny, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock H ill. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-94-27, CA-96-1624-0-6) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 26, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Neal, III, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Neal , Nos. CR-94-27; CA-96-1624-0-6 (D.S.C.June 12, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
     BEACON CAPITAL INVESTMENT, INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
     ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     524,529
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         524,529
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               524,529
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 524,529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,410
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    517,119
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   524,529
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,165
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               21,045
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               14,880
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   14,880
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .01
        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

GILLIAN LEWIS HITSON

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 23 DB 2018 (No. 28 RST 2018)

Attorney Registration No. 80367

(Out of State)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2018, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated May 15, 2018, is approved and it is ORDERED that

Gillian Lewis Hitson, who has been on Administrative Suspension, has never been 

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, 

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, 

shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this 

Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing 

of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
Exhibit 31.2

                         CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dan Mumford, Chief Financial Officer of Speaking Roses International, Inc.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Speaking Roses
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
  disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
  to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
  within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
  report is being prepared;

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
  and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
  of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
  control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's first
  fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 that has materially affected, or is
  reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
  over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
  operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
  reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
  record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

  b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
  employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
  over financial reporting.


Date: May 23, 2005                    By/s/ Dan Mumford
                                      Dan Mumford,
                                      Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Penn Virginia GP Holdings, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
William H. Shea, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of PVG GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: October 29, 2010 |  |  |  |                                      
|                       |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | /s/ William H. Shea, Jr.             
|                       |  |  |  | William H. Shea, Jr.                 
|                       |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:11-cv-04287-KM-SCM Document 90-2 Filed 09/18/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 2772
Case 2:11-cv-04287-KM-SCM Document 90-2 Filed 09/18/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2773
#### Pullman’s Palace Car Company *v.*Martin.

Under the facts in evidence, there was no error in denying a non-suit.

January 28,1895.

Atkinson, Justice.

Upon the exception to the order overruling the motion for nonsuit, brought up by bill of exceptions to the last term of this court, and which, by consent, was continued to be argued and considered along with the main case, it is unnecessary to do more than refer to the discussion of the evidence as stated in’ the opinion in the case of *Pullman’s Palace Car Company*v. Martin, this day decided. *Ante,*316. *Judgment affirmed.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

VICTORY INTERNATIONAL (USA)

LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

LA VERSAILLES FRAGRANCES, INC.,

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action No. 11-757 (SRC)

OPINION

CHESLER, District Judge

This matter has come before the Court on the motion for summary judgment,

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, by Plaintiff Victory International (USA)

LLC (“Plaintiff”). The motion is unopposed. For the reasons stated below, the motion

will be granted.

“When the moving party has the burden of proof at trial, that party must show

affirmatively the absence of a genuine issue of material fact: it must show that, on all the

essential elements of its case on which it bears the burden of proof at trial, no reasonable

jury could find for the non-moving party.” In re Bressman, 327 F.3d 229, 238 (3d Cir.

2003) (quoting United States v. Four Parcels of Real Property, 941 F.2d 1428, 1438 (11th

Cir. 1991)). The sole issue before this Court in addressing this unopposed motion is

whether Plaintiff has pointed to evidence sufficient to establish the essential elements of

its case. 

Plaintiff has offered evidence that it delivered to Defendant goods with a value of

Case 2:11-cv-00757-SRC-MAS Document 35 Filed 01/17/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 234
$651,154.75, that it retained a purchase money security interest in the goods until they

had been paid for, that Defendant has not paid for the goods, and that it has perfected the

purchase money security interest. Plaintiff now seeks to foreclose on the purchase money

security interest. Plaintiff has offered evidence sufficient to establish all the essential

elements of its claim. 

N.J. Stat. Ann. § 12A:9-601 states: 

(a) Rights of secured party after default. After default, a secured party has

the rights provided in this part and, except as otherwise provided in

12A:9-602, those provided by agreement of the parties. A secured party:

(1) may reduce a claim to judgment, foreclose, or otherwise enforce the

claim, security interest, or agricultural lien by any available judicial

procedure. 

Pursuant to N.J. Stat. Ann. § 12A:9-601(a), this Court is authorized to foreclose on the

security interest. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is granted, and Judgment shall

be entered in Plaintiff’s favor in the amount of $651,154.75. 

 s/ Stanley R. Chesler 

Stanley R. Chesler, U.S.D.J

2

Case 2:11-cv-00757-SRC-MAS Document 35 Filed 01/17/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 235
EXHIBIT 32.2
                        COLLECTIBLE CONCEPTS GROUP, INC.
      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Collectible  Concepts  Group,  Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended February 28, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  Report),  I, Paul
Lipschutz,  Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Collectible Concepts Group, Inc. and will be retained by Collectible
Concepts Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.

Date:  October 20, 2005


 /s/ Paul Lipschutz
---------------------------
Paul Lipschutz
Principal Financial Officer
May 12, 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

BERNARDO TORRES , JR. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00006

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

___________ _____________________ This cause was heard on the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5380

To improve the safe operation of aircraft. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2004

Mr. WEINER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To improve the safe operation of aircraft.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flight 587 Account5 ability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INFORMATION IN FLIGHT MANUALS. 

7 The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Adminis8 tration shall require each manufacturer of aircraft to list 

9 any information in the limitation section of each flight 

10 manual that may affect the safe operation of an aircraft. 
2

•HR 5380 IH 

1 SEC. 3. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. 

2 Except in cases in which an adjudicatory resolution 

3 is sought, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Ad4 ministration shall resolve a dispute between an aircraft 

5 manufacturer and an aircraft operator that arises regard6 ing the safe operation of an aircraft. 

7 SEC. 4. IMPLEMENTATION OF SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS. 

8 Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment 

9 of this Act, the Government Accountability Office shall 

10 conduct a study to review the effectiveness and timeliness 

11 of the Federal Aviation Administration in implementing 

12 recommendations made by the National Transportation 

13 Safety Board.

Æ
IB 

Union Calendar No. 207

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 587

[Report No. 108–353] 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to add Ashtabula, Mahoning, and 

Trumbull Counties, Ohio, to the Appalachian region. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2003

Mr. LATOURETTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

NOVEMBER 6, 2003

Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House 

on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL

To amend title 40, United States Code, to add Ashtabula, 

Mahoning, and Trumbull Counties, Ohio, to the Appalachian region.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADDITIONS TO APPALACHIAN REGION. 

4 Section 14102(1)(H) of title 40, United States Code, 

5 is amended—
2

•HR 587 RH 

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘Ashtabula,’’ after ‘‘Adams,’’; 

2 (2) by inserting ‘‘Mahoning,’’ after ‘‘Law3 rence,’’; and 

4 (3) by inserting ‘‘Trumbull,’’ after ‘‘Scioto,’’.

5 SECTION 1. ADDITIONS TO APPALACHIAN REGION. 

6 (a) KENTUCKY.—Section 14102(a)(1)(C) of title 40, 

7 United States Code, is amended—

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘Nicholas,’’ after ‘‘Morgan,’’; 

9 and 

10 (2) by inserting ‘‘Robertson,’’ after ‘‘Pulaski,’’. 

11 (b) OHIO.—Section 14102(a)(1)(H) of such title is 

12 amended—

13 (1) by inserting ‘‘Ashtabula,’’ after ‘‘Adams,’’; 

14 (2) by inserting ‘‘Fayette,’’ after ‘‘Coshocton,’’; 

15 (3) by inserting ‘‘Mahoning,’’ after ‘‘Lawrence,’’; 

16 and 

17 (4) by inserting ‘‘Trumbull,’’ after ‘‘Scioto,’’. 

18 (c) TENNESSEE.—Section 14102(a)(1)(K) of such title 

19 is amended—

20 (1) by inserting ‘‘Giles,’’ after ‘‘Franklin,’’; and 

21 (2) by inserting ‘‘Lawrence, Lewis, Lincoln,’’ 

22 after ‘‘Knox,’’. 

23 (d) VIRGINIA.—Section 14102(a)(1)(L) of such title is 

24 amended—

25 (1) by inserting ‘‘Henry,’’ after ‘‘Grayson,’’; and 
3

•HR 587 RH 

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘Patrick,’’ after ‘‘Montgomery,’’. 

2 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

3 Section 14703(a) of title 40, United States Code, is 

4 amended by striking paragraphs (1) through (3) and insert5 ing the following: 

6 ‘‘(1) $88,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2002 

7 and 2003. 

8 ‘‘(2) $91,000,000 for fiscal year 2004. 

9 ‘‘(3) $93,000,000 for fiscal year 2005. 

10 ‘‘(4) $95,000,000 for fiscal year 2006.’’.

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to amend title 

40, United States Code, to make additions to the Appalachian region, and for other purposes.’’. 
Union Calendar No. 207

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 587

[Report No. 108–353] 

A BILL

To amend title 40, United States Code, to add Ashtabula, Mahoning, and Trumbull Counties, Ohio, 

to the Appalachian region. 

NOVEMBER 6, 2003

Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee 

of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
v. Crim, No. 11-131

ELVIN R. CABBALLERO ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on the petition ofthe United States Probation

Office for a hearing regarding the failure of defendant Elvin R. Caballero (David Holman.

Assistant Federal Public Defender, appearing) to comply with certain conditions of supervised

release imposed on May 8, 2009; and the defendant having entered a guilty plea on June 20,

2012 to having violated a condition of supervised release which states he shall not commit

another federal, state, or local crime; and for good cause shown;

IT IS on thisdayofJune, 2012,

ORDERED that the defendant is adjudged guilty of having violated a condition of

supervised release which states he shall not commit another federal, state, or local crime by

being sentenced on May 15, 2012 in the Middle District of Pennsylvania by the HonorableEdwin M. Kosik on two counts of Stealing Blank Money Order Forms Under the Authority of

the Postal Service, in violation of 18 USC. § 500;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the term of supervised release is hereby revoked:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of

the Bureau of Prisons to he imprisoned for a period of twenty-two months to run consecutively

to the sentence imposed by Judge Kosik in the Middle District of Pennsylvania;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no additional period ofsupervised release will be
ull force and effect.

HONORABLE SA%EY R. (‘HESLER

United States Ditrict Judge
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Shaw Hong, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of OmniVision Technologies, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
June 30, 2008

| |  | By: | /s/SHAW HONGShaw HongChief
Executive Officer and President
| |  | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks