alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001



Subsidiary of BNP Residential Properties, Inc.:

     Subsidiary name:             BNP Residential Properties Limited Partnership
     State of organization:       Delaware
     Business name:               BNP Residential Properties Limited Partnership

Subsidiaries of BNP Residential Properties Limited Partnership:

     Subsidiary name:             BNP Realty, LLC
     State of organization:       North Carolina
     Business name:               BNP Realty, LLC

     Subsidiary name:             BNP/Chrysson Phase I, LLC
     State of organization:       North Carolina
     Business name:               BNP/Chrysson Phase I, LLC

     Subsidiary name:             BNP Chason Ridge, LLC
     State of organization:       North Carolina
     Business name:               BNP Chason Ridge, LLC

     Subsidiary name:             BNP/Paces Commons, LLC
     State of organization:       Delaware
     Business name:               BNP/Paces Commons, LLC

     Subsidiary name:             BNP Residential Management Services, LLC
     State of organization:       North Carolina
     Business name:               BNP Residential Management Services, LLC

     Subsidiary name:             BNP/Oakbrook, LLC
     State of organization:       Delaware
     Business name:               BNP/Oakbrook, LLC

Subsidiary of BNP Realty, LLC:

     Subsidiary name:             BNP Management, Inc.
     State of organization:       North Carolina
     Business name:               BNP Management, Inc.




                                       53
<PAGE>
###### **EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

AlphaPro Tech, LtdCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd on from 10-Q for the period ending March31,2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Sheldon Hoffman Chief Executive Officer of the company,certify, pursuant to 10 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934: and

 

(2)                                   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| DATE:  | April 21, 2003 | BY:    | /s/  Sheldon Hoffman    |
|--------|----------------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |           |   | SHELDON HOFFMAN         |
|   |           |   | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |

 

 

----
EX-10.20



 Exhibit 10.20 
 WESTWOOD HOLDINGS GROUP, INC. 
 MUTUAL FUND SHARE INCENTIVE AGREEMENT

 AMENDMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT OF THE MUTUAL FUND SHARE INCENTIVE AGREEMENT (The “Agreement”) dated February 7, 2012 between Mark Freeman (“Participant”) and Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. (the
“Company” and, together with its subsidiaries, “WHG”), whose registered office is 200 Crescent Court, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas, is made and entered into as of the 14 day of JANUARY, 2013. 

Effective February 7, 2012, the Agreement is amended as follows: 

 

	1.	Revised Paragraph 2(a). Add the following sentence at the end of Paragraph 2(a): 


The Morningstar rating assigned to the Fund for the Performance Period shall be the Overall Rating reflecting Fund performance through
December 31 of the Performance Period as published by Morningstar on or about the third business day following the end of the Performance Period. 
  

	2.	Revised Paragraph 4(a). Remove Paragraph 4(a) A in its entirety and replace with the following language: 


(a) General. Participant’s right to receive payment of the Account will become vested twelve (12) months from
December 31, 2012, which is the end of the Performance Period (the “Stated Vesting Date”), subject to Participant’s continuous employment with WHG. If Participant’s employment with WHG terminates before the Stated Vesting
Date (or before an Accelerated Vesting Date, as described below), the Participant will forfeit the entire Account balance and will have no further rights under or in respect of this Agreement, except where vesting terms that are more favorable to
the Participant are specified elsewhere in this Agreement, in the employment agreement between Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. and Participant effective February 7, 2012, or as determined by the Committee (in its sole discretion),
the vesting terms most favorable to the Participant shall control. 
  

	3.	Miscellaneous. Except as herein modified, the Agreement dated February 7, 2012 shall be and remain unchanged and in full force and effect according
to its terms. 


  
 Page 1 of 2









 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. 

 

			
	WESTWOOD HOLDINGS GROUP, INC.
		
	By:	 	 




  

		 	Brian O. Casey
		 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	
	PARTICIPANT:
		
	By:	 	 




  

		 	Mark Freeman
		 	Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer



  
 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 21.1
 Blackboard Inc. Subsidiaries
 Entity
    
    State/Country of FormationBlackboard Tennessee, LLC
    
    DelawareBb Acquisition Corp.
    
    DelawareBlackboard International Holdings Inc.
    
    DelawareBb Management Co. LLC
    
    DelawareBlackboard CampusWide of Texas, Inc.
    
    TexasBlackboard International LP
    
    BermudaBlackboard International B.V.
    
    NetherlandsBlackboard Japan KK
    
    JapanBlackboard (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaBlackboard (UK) Limited
    
    United KingdomBlackboard Educational (Canada) Corporation
    
    CanadaBlackboard (Australia) Pty Ltd.
    
    AustraliaCerbibo Holding Co., Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsXythos Software, Inc.
    
    DelawareXythos Czech s.r.o.
    
    Czech RepublicBlackboard Connect Inc.
    
    DelawareNotification Technologies, Inc.
    
    DelawareBlackboard Singapore Pty Limited
    
    Singapore
#### Farmer *v.*The State.

Simmons, J. — The showing for a continuance was incomplete, if not appearing that the application was not made for delay; it did not appear by affidavit or otherwise that the accused and his counsel were ignorant of the alleged newly discovered evidence until after the verdict; the law of involuntary manslaughter in the commission of a lawful act without due caution and circumspection was inapplicable to the facts of the case; the evidence for the State warranted a conviction for murder, and as the accused was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter in the commission of an unlawful act, he has no cause for complaint against the verdict.

November 12,1894.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Hutchins. Jackson superior court. August term, 1894.

George C. Thomas and John J. Strickland, for plaintiff' in error. R. B. Russell, solicitor-general, *contra.*

*Judgment affirmed.*
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001

Commission file number 333-42127-05

ABN AMRO Mortgage Corporation (as depositor under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
Dated as of February 1, 2000 providing for, inter alia, the issuance of ABN AMRO Mortgage
Corporation Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2000-1)
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of  incorporation or organization)

363886007
(I.R.S. Employer  Identification No.)

181 West Madison Street, Chicago, Illinois  60602
(Address of principal executive offices)

60602
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (248)  643-2530

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
           Yes [X]       No  [ ]


This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A amends Item 14 of the original Form 10-K
which was filed on March 26, 2002


      Item 14.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.

	(a)	Exhibits

		(99.1)	Annual Independent Accountant's Servicing Report

		(99.2)	Annual Statement of Compliance

	(b) 	Reports on Form 8-K were filed during the last quarter of 2001 in order
		to provide statements for the monthly distributions to investors on
		September 27, 2001, October 25, 2001, November 27, 2001, and December 26, 2001.





				SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

LaSalle Bank National Association, in its
capacity as Agent for the Trustee under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement on behalf of  ABN AMRO Mortgage
Corporation, Registrant


By:	/s/  	Cynthia Reis
	---------------------------
		Cynthia Reis
		First Vice President

Date:	May 21, 2002
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

34. Unemployed jobseekers by sex, reason for unemployment, and active jobsearch methods used

[Numbers in thousands]

Sex and reason

2019

Unemployed Percent of jobseekers using method

Average

number of

methods

used

Total Jobseekers

Contacted

employer

directly

Sent out

resumes

or filled

out

applications

Placed

or

answered

ads

Contacted

friends

or

relatives

Public

employment

agency

Private

employment

agency

Other

Total unemployed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,001 5,177 51.1 56.0 13.1 23.3 13.6 7.7 13.5 1.8

Job losers and persons who completed

temporary jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,786 1,963 53.1 56.3 15.1 27.8 17.4 10.0 14.0 1.9

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 814 55.6 58.8 15.0 20.4 12.8 8.1 12.9 1.8

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,810 1,810 48.1 53.6 11.1 20.8 11.0 5.6 14.0 1.6

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 591 591 47.4 58.9 10.5 19.9 10.1 5.4 11.1 1.6

Men. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,227 2,749 51.9 53.8 12.9 24.2 13.9 7.6 14.0 1.8

Job losers and persons who completed

temporary jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,611 1,133 54.2 53.6 14.9 28.1 16.8 9.5 14.8 1.9

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 444 444 55.5 57.8 15.2 22.6 11.9 8.3 13.0 1.9

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 851 48.2 51.2 9.7 21.6 12.2 5.6 14.4 1.6

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321 321 48.7 55.6 11.3 19.8 10.8 5.8 11.9 1.6

Women. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,774 2,429 50.2 58.6 13.4 22.3 13.3 7.7 12.9 1.8

Job losers and persons who completed

temporary jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,175 830 51.5 60.0 15.4 27.4 18.3 10.8 12.9 2.0

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 370 370 55.9 60.0 14.7 17.8 13.9 7.9 12.7 1.8

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 959 959 48.1 55.7 12.3 20.1 9.9 5.7 13.6 1.7

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270 270 45.7 62.8 9.5 20.2 9.3 5.0 10.2 1.6

1 Data on the number of jobseekers and the jobsearch methods used exclude persons on temporary layoff.

NOTE: The jobseekers total is less than the total unemployed because it does not include persons on temporary layoff. The percent using each method will always total

more than 100 because many jobseekers use more than one method. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Quarter Ended April 30, 2003 (the "Report") by Forgent Networks, Inc.
("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

         1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

         2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of Registrant.

                                                    /s/ RICHARD N. SNYDER
                                                        ------------------
                                                    Richard N. Snyder
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    June 16, 2003

                                                    /s/ JAY C. PETERSON
                                                        -------------------
                                                    Jay C. Peterson
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                    June 16, 2003
Exhibit 32.2

 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
Velocity Asset Management, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2004, I, James
J. Mastriani, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.      Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004,
        fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
        year ended December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of Velocity Asset
        Management, Inc.

                                            VELOCITY ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.


Dated: April 13, 2005                      By: /s/ JAMES J. MASTRIANI
                                               --------------------------------
                                               James J. Mastriani
                                               Chief Financial Officer
#### Washington *v.*The State.

Atkinson, J. — No error of law having been committed, and the verdict being supported by the evidence, this court will not interfere with the discretion of the trial judge in refusing a new trial.

December 21, 1894.

Indictment for robbery. Before Judge Harris. Oar-roll superior court. April term, 1894.

W. D. Hamrick and S. Holderness, for plaintiff in error. T. A. Atkinson, solicitor-general, *contra.*

*Judgment affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 By:
    /s/  Michael NoleName:
    Michael NoleTitle:
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    May 15, 2009
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 19-1896 JACKELINE BARBOSA, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Appellant, MARK ANDERSON, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated; DOUGLASS BAKER, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,

v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC; SCHREIBER/COHEN, LLC, Defendants, Appellees, LUSTIG, GLASER & WILSON, P.C., Defendant.

**ERRATA SHEET** The opinion of this Court issued on November 25, 2020, is amended as follows: On page 9, line 1, replace "like to us" with "like us"
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 570 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 570

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 5-year 
      extension of the credit for electricity produced from wind.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2003

    Mr. Foley (for himself, Mr. Weller, Mr. Matsui, Mrs. Johnson of 
 Connecticut, Mr. Pomeroy, Mr. McCrery, Mr. Hayworth, Mr. Ramstad, Mr. 
McInnis, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Doggett, Mr. Becerra, Mrs. Jones of 
 Ohio, Ms. Berkley, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. Leach, Mrs. Davis of California, 
 Mr. Paul, Mr. Wu, Mr. Stupak, Mr. Udall of New Mexico, Mr. Langevin, 
  Mr. Walden of Oregon, Mrs. Tauscher, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Sanders, Mr. 
 Shays, Mr. Inslee, Mr. Snyder, Mr. Engel, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, 
  Mr. Simpson, Mr. Otter, Mrs. Capps, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. Kennedy of 
Minnesota, Mr. Ehlers, Mr. Green of Wisconsin, Mr. Smith of Washington, 
Mr. Hoeffel, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Deutsch, Mr. Delahunt, Mr. Greenwood, Mr. 
 Lucas of Oklahoma, Mr. Weldon of Florida, Mr. Gutknecht, Mr. Simmons, 
 Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Bereuter, Mr. Latham, Mr. Rehberg, Mr. Boucher, Mr. 
  Frost, Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart of Florida, and Mr. Moran of Kansas) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 5-year 
      extension of the credit for electricity produced from wind.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 5-YEAR EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR ELECTRICITY PRODUCED FROM 
              WIND.

    Section 45(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 
to wind facility) is amended by striking ``2004'' and inserting 
``2009''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

Section 1350 Certification

 

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of DirectView, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michele Ralston, acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/Michele Ralston

Michele Ralston

Acting Chief Financial Officer

November 20 , 2006

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### BARROM et al. v. ROUX LABORATORIES, Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Oct. 1, 1942.

Abraham D. Shackton, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Glenney, Mathews & Hampton, of New York City, (Walter L. Glenney, of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

COXE, District Judge.

It cannot be said at this time that the challenged allegations of the complaint have no bearing on the subject matter of the action. That is a question which should properly be left to the trial judge to determine when evidence is offered. Motions to strike are not favored, and I cannot see that the defendants will in any way be prejudiced by allowing the allegations to stand.

The motion of the defendants to strike is denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 

JAMES JOSEPH KRIVACSKA, :

Petitioner, :

v. :

GARY LANIGAN, :

Respondent. :

 

Civil Action No. 11-3729 (FLW)

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court upon Petitioner’s Motion

for Reconsideration, see Docket Entry No. 37, from this Court’s

decision, see Docket Entry No. 36, and renewed Motion for Leave

to File In Forma Pauperis, see Docket Entry No. 38, and it

appearing that:

1. By Memorandum Opinion and Order dated December 18, 2012,

this Court denied Petitioner’s Motion for leave to appeal in

forma pauperis, Docket Entry No. 30. See Docket Entry No.

36.

2. Petitioner then filed his Motion for Reconsideration and his

renewed Motion for Leave to File In Forma Pauperis on

January 2, 2013. See Docket Entry Nos. 37 and 38.

3. On February 22, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals For

the Third Circuit issued an order denying Petitioner’s

application for a certificate of appealability (COA) with

respect to this matter. See Docket Entry No. 39.

Case 3:11-cv-03729-FLW Document 40 Filed 05/10/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 5742
4. Accordingly, Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration and his

renewed Motion for Leave to File In Forma Pauperis are

rendered moot by the Third Circuit decision denying a COA in

this matter. 

IT IS, therefore, on this 10 day of May , 2013, th

ORDERED that the Clerk shall reopen this matter for the

purposes of this Court’s examination of Petitioner’s motions,

Docket Entry Nos. 37 & 38; and it is further

ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration, Docket

Entry No. 37, is DENIED as moot; and it is further

ORDERED that Petitioner’s renewed Motion for Leave to File

In Forma Pauperis, Docket Entry No. 38, is DENIED as moot; and it

is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall close the file on this matter

by making a new and separate entry on the docket reading, “CIVIL

CASE TERMINATED.”

s/Freda L. Wolfson 

Freda L. Wolfson, U.S.D.J

2

Case 3:11-cv-03729-FLW Document 40 Filed 05/10/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 5743
Series {
  Decimals = 3
  File = "c:\vx13\Marie 2019\s6.dat"
  Format = Datevalue
  Save = (B1)
  Span = (2012.01,2019.12)
  Start = 2012.01
  Title = "Cereals and bakery products - last yr's model (2012.01,2019.12)"
}
PickMdl { 
  File = "c:\vx13\Marie 2019\x12a.mdl"
  Method = Best
  Mode = Fcst
  Overdiff = 0.95
}
Estimate { 
  Exact = ArMa
  MaxIter = 200
  Print = (LkStats)
}
Regression { 
  Variables = (AO2015.10)
}
Transform { Power = 0.0 } 
X11 { 
  AppendFcst = No 
  Mode = Mult
  Print = (Brief +Extreme +D13)
  Save = (C20 D10 D11 D13)
  SeasonalMA = Msr
  SigmaLim = (1.5 2.5)
  Title = "Cereals and bakery products - last yr's model (2012.01,2019.12)"
}
Spectrum {print=()}