alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         24,538
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  284,441
<ALLOWANCES>                                   37,303
<INVENTORY>                                    41,254
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               347,142
<PP&E>                                         283,290
<DEPRECIATION>                                 135,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,041,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          581,187
<BONDS>                                        1,956,997
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          557,841
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       984,154
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,064,893)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,041,074
<SALES>                                        1,573,573
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,573,573
<CGS>                                          367,466
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  367,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,087,950
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             144,442
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (37,736)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (37,736)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (37,736)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.71)



</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
OF PERIODIC REPORT
  Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  the undersigned officer of Seaway Valley
Capital Corporation (the "Company") certifies that:
  1. The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter ended March 31,
2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and
  2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /S/
            THOMAS
      SCOZZAFAVATHOMAS
      SCOZZAFAVAChief
      Executive Officer and
      Chief Financial OfficerDate:
            May 20,
      2008
   This
certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
[No. 49075-3-I.

Division One.

November 14, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Victor Matthew David, *Appellant.*

*233
      *Oliver R. Davis*(of *Washington Appellate Project),*for appellant.

*Janice E. Ellis, Prosecuting Attorney,*and *Seth A. Fine, David F. Thiele,*and *Mary K. Webber, Deputies,*for respondent.

f 1

Per Curiam.

— This case was remanded to us following our Supreme Court’s decision in *State v. Hughes*
      *1*
      **We withdraw the former unpublished section F of *State v.*David2 relating to the exceptional sentence and replace it with this published section C.

*C. Exceptional Sentence*

¶2 David also contends that the trial court erred in imposing an exceptional sentence under RCW 9-.94A.535.3 Recently, the Supreme Court in *Blakely v. Washington*
      *4*
      **held unconstitutional an exceptional sentence that is based on facts (other than prior convictions) not found by the jury beyond a reasonable doubt. *Blakely*does not *234invalidate RCW 9.94A.535 on its face, but it does provide for an as-applied challenge.5

¶3 None of the six aggravating factors used to lengthen David’s sentence was found by the jury, and none was a prior conviction. The exceptional sentence was improper in light of *Blakely*and is reversed.

¶4 The only remaining question is the appropriate sentencing procedure on remand. To uphold the exceptional sentence, a jury would need to be empanelled to make the appropriate findings of fact. In *Hughes,*our Supreme Court determined that only the legislature may amend RCW 9-.94A.535 to require this procedure.6 The legislature recently did so, but whether the amendment applies retroactively has yet to be decided.

f 5 We affirm the judgment and remand for resentencing.

154 Wn.2d 118, 134, 110 P.3d 192 (2005).

118 Wn. App. 61, 74 P.3d 686 (2003).

RCW 9.94A.535 allows the court to “impose a sentence outside the standard sentence range for an offense if it finds, considering the purpose of this chapter, that there are substantial and compelling reasons justifying an exceptional sentence.”

542 U.S. 296, 124 S. Ct. 2531, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004).

*Hughes,*154 Wn.2d at 134.

*Hughes,*154 Wn.2d at 149.
# 2012

&P
Exhibit 32.1

|   | **CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER** |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|

 

 

I, Derek Jones, Chief Executive Officer of Quantum Companies, Inc., (the “Small Business Issuer”) do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that:

 

(1) The Small Business Issuer’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) to which this statement is filed as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Small Business Issuer.

 

|   | By:*/s/ Derek Jones* | Date: April 11, 2007 |
|--------|----------------------|----------------------|

|   | Derek Jones |
|--------|-------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|
# Employment Projections and Occupational Outlook Handbook

"The Employment Projections and Occupational Outlook Handbook news release presents estimates of the size and composition of the U.S. labor force 10 years into the future, including projections of employment by industry and occupation. These projections, along with information on job duties, wages, and education and training requirements, are presented in the Occupational Outlook Handbook, the government’s premier source of career information."

- Total employment is projected to increase almost 4.7 million from 2022 to 2032
- Employment is projected to increase by 8.3 million jobs from 2021 to 2031
- Employment is projected to increase by 11.9 million jobs from 2020 to 2030
- Employment is projected to grow by 6.0 million jobs from 2019 to 2029
- Employment is projected to grow by 8.4 million jobs from 2018 to 2028
- Employment is projected to grow by 11.5 million from 2016 to 2026, led by health care
- Healthcare industries are projected to become the largest employer in 2024
- Employment is projected to grow 10.8% from 2012 to 2022, led by jobs in healthcare
- Employment is projected to grow 14.3% from 2010-20, led by health care and construction
#### Melvin C. LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES of America, The Internal Revenue Service, The State of New York, The State of Florida, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-11335

Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 21, 2012.

Melvin C. Lewis, Clermont, FL, pro se.

Laurie Snyder, Michael J. Haungs, Steven Christopher Woodliff, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Robert E. O’Neill, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Victor G. Paladino, William J. McCarthy, Attorney General’s Office, Albany, NY, Ana Margarita Gargollo-McDonald, Pam Bondi, Attorney General’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Melvin Lewis appeals the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his *pro se*civil complaint, which alleged that the United States and other defendants placed unlawful liens on his property due to unpaid federal income taxes, and also *863alleged that he was owed damages stemming from his liens over the United States. Although Lewis essentially challenged his underlying tax debt and the resulting liens, he brought claims pursuant to general jurisdiction statutes and admiralty laws.

We conclude from the record that the district court did not err in granting defendants’ separate motions to dismiss the complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for a lack of subject matter jurisdiction, where (1) New York and Florida were immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment; (2) the United States was immune under general rules of sovereign immunity; (3) Lewis’s true recourse, if any, was in the United States Tax Court; and (4) his complaint was patently frivolous. Additionally, we conclude that it was not an abuse of discretion for the district court to dismiss the complaint with prejudice, where any amendment to the complaint would not have cured the lack of subject matter jurisdiction, a fatal deficiency. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of dismissal.

AFFIRMED.
**Taft /**One Indiana Square, Suite 3500 /  Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-4609Tel: 317.713.3500 /  Fax: 317.713.3699www.taftlaw.com

March 29, 2016

Saturna Investment Trust  c/o Saturna Capital  1300 North State Street  Bellingham, Washington 98225-4730

> 
Re: Amendment to Form N-1A

Gentlemen:

 	In accordance with the registration of an indefinite number of units ("Units") registered by Saturna Investment Trust (the "Trust") for its Funds, we have been asked to provide the opinion of our counsel required to be filed as an exhibit to the Trust's registration statement on Form N-1A (the "Registration Statement"). In rendering this opinion, we have examined such documents, records and questions of law as we deemed it necessary to examine for the purpose of this opinion. Based on that examination and investigation, it is our opinion that the Units will be, upon issuance, validly issued, fully paid and not liable to further assessments.

 We have reviewed Post Effective No. 47, and determined that it does not contain disclosures that would render it ineligible to become effective under Rule 485(b) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933.

 We consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to Post Effective Amendment No. 45 to the Registration Statement.

> 
 Sincerely,

TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP*/s/Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP*

15807110

Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP             Chicago / Cincinnati / Cleveland / Columbus / Dayton / Indianapolis / Northern Kentucky / Phoenix
ABN AMRO

ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc.

4242 North Harlem Avenue

Norridge, Illinois 60706 1283

(708) 583 7579

Mary Pat Sperlik

First Vice President

 

 

 

 

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

 

The undersigned, an officer of ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc., (the "participant"), hereby certifies as follows:

I have made, or caused to be made under my supervision, a review of the activities of ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc.

during the preceding calendar year ending December 31, 2002, with respect to performance under the Servicing Certificates

attached:

and

To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, there is as of this date, no default by ABN AMRO in the fulfillment 

of any of it's obligations under these issues, except as otherwise noted in the Management Report related to each issue.

In witness whereof the undersigned has this Certificate of Compliance this 1st day of March, 2003.

ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, In.

By:	*Mary P. Sperlik
	Mary P. Sperlik

	First Vice President

					

 

 

 

Banks and Other Lending Offices: ABN AMRO Mortgage, LaSalle Bank N.A., LaSalle Home Mortgage, Standard Federal Bank NA

 

Affiliates: LaSalle Bank, LaSalle Home Mortgage, Standard Federal Bank

 

 

 

 

 

 

Banks and Other Lending Offices: ABN AMRO Mortgage, LaSalle Bank N.A., LaSalle Home Mortgage, Standard Federal Bank NA
** 

Master Servicing Certificates**
PROGRAM NUMBER:		ABN98001

					ABN98002

ABN98003

ABN98004

ABN98005

ABN99001

ABN99002

ABN99003

ABN99004

ABN99005

ABN99006

ABN99007

ABN99008

ABN00001

ABN00002

ABN00003

ABN00004

ABN01002

ABN01003

ABN01005

ABN01006

ABN0101A

ABN01007

ABN01008

ABN02001

ABN02002

ABN02003

ABN02004

ABN0201A

ABN02007

ABN02008

ABN02010

ABN02005

ABN02006

ABN03001

ABN03002

 

 

 

 *
EX-10.8.3




 EXHIBIT 10.8.3 
 COMPENSATION AGREEMENT 
 It is hereby agreed and understood between James A. Datin
(“Executive”) and Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. (the “Company”) as of this 28th day of December, 2012 as follows: 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary that may be contained in any other written agreement pertaining to the employment of Executive by the Company,
in an effort to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and other applicable rules and regulations, effective December 31, 2012, upon any termination of Executive’s employment in circumstances which result in the Company being
obligated regarding the payment of amounts relating to COBRA coverage, in order to comply with its obligations the Company shall no longer waive the applicable premium otherwise payable for COBRA continuation coverage or directly subsidize payment
of the applicable premium for continued coverage under Safeguard’s medical insurance plan for Executive (and, to the extent covered immediately prior to the date of Executive’s termination of employment, his spouse and dependents).

 In lieu of such waiver or direct subsidy, Executive will be entitled to reimbursement by the Company of the cost of such COBRA continuation
coverage with respect to medical insurance, less such co-payment amount payable by Executive under the terms of the Company’s medical insurance program, as may be amended from time to time. Such reimbursement shall only be made to the extent
Executive continues to pay the monthly premiums for such medical insurance. 
 Other than as specifically set forth herein, it is not intended
that this Agreement shall in any way affect any of the other prevailing terms of employment between Executive and the Company 
 In witness
whereof, the undersigned have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	EXECUTIVE
		
		 	/s/ James A. Datin
	Name:	 	James A. Datin
	
	SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Brian J. Sisko
	Name:	 	Brian J. Sisko
	Title:	 	 Executive Vice President and

Managing Director
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6883** 

EDWARD HAROLD SAUNDERS, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v.
KENNETH E. LAY , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:11

- cv - 00566

- BO )

Submitted : September 4, 2012 Decided: September 12, 2012

Before KING and SHEDD , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Edward Harold Saunders, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Edward Harold Saunders, Jr. appeals the district
court ’ s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ( 200 6) complaint as frivolous . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we a ffirm the district court ’s order
. See Saunders v. Lay , No. 5:11

- cv - 00566

- BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the fa cts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
EX-10.8.4



 Exhibit 10.8.4 
 To: 
 Ormat Technologies, Inc. 

May 22, 2012 

Re:     Waiver of certain Compensation 

I, the undersigned, Yoram Bronicki, ID No. 022808984, an employee of Ormat Technologies Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the
“Company”) hereby acknowledge, declare and confirm that: 
 Subject to the consummation and performance of the
transaction (the “Transaction”) contemplated by the Share Purchase Agreement dated March 16, 2012 by and among Bronicki Investments Ltd., an Israeli Company (Company No. 51-255064-1), organized under the laws of the State
of Israel, FIMI ENRG, Limited Partnership, a newly formed Israeli Limited Partnership and FIMI ENRG L.P., a newly formed Delaware limited partnership (the “Buyer” and the “Share Purchase Agreement”, respectively), I
hereby waive any golden parachute or any similar rights I have that may have been triggered by or as a result of the Transaction, and for avoidance of doubt I hereby irrevocably agree that the Transaction (including for the avoidance of doubt any
designation or election of any directors by either the Buyer and/or the Seller, directly or indirectly, in connection with the closing of the Transaction and thereafter) shall not be deemed at all times and for all intents and purposes a
“Change of Control” as defined in the Employment Agreement dated December 23, 2004, as amended from time to time, by and between the Company and the undersigned (“Employment Agreement”). 

Sincerely, 
  /s/ Yoram Bronicki

 Mr. Yoram Bronicki 
  

	Cc:	Ormat Industries Ltd. 

 FIMI
ENRG, Limited Partnership 
 FIMI ENRG L.P.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Jill Kathryn Arno Peterson

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 01029

- CV

Trial court case number: 2018

- 43305

Trial court: 280th District Court of Harris County

By order dated January 7, 2019, this Court abated the proceeding and remanded it to the

trial court to allow the successor respondent to reconsider the ruling challenged. Relator has filed

a motion to reinstate, attaching an order signed January 28, 2019, confirming the original ruling

and granting the motion for new trial. Relator also filed an amended motion to reinstate attaching

the trial court’s order and a copy of the hearing record.

Accordingly, we GRANT relator’s motion s and REINSTATE the proceedin g on the

active docket.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

__

/s/ Justice Richard Hightower

________________  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___ March 14, 2019

___
EXHIBIT 31.1 / 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS  I, Floricel Leiton, certify that:  1.      I have reviewed
this report on Form 10-Q of Coronado Corp.  2.      Based on my
knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.      Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;  4.      I am responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)
for the Registrant and have;  (a)  Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal
control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness
of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any
change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.      I have disclosed,
based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies
and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Registrants ability to record, process,summarize and report
financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  November 13,
2009

/s/Floricel LeitonFloricel Leition
Principal Executive and Financial
Officer
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly present, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                August 14, 2007                                                                                                                                           |        |        |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                |        |        |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                           |   |   |   |
| By:                 /s/                Kelly Fan                                                                                                                          |   |   |        |
| Name: Kelly              Fan                                                                                                                                              |   |   |        |
| Title: President,                Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer,                and Director(Principal                  Executive, Financial, and Accounting Officer) |   |   |        |

----