alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 60 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 60

To amend the Metric Conversion Act of 1975 to require Federal agencies 
 to impose certain requirements on recipients of awards for scientific 
                       and engineering research.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

  Mr. Ehlers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                          Committee on Science

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Metric Conversion Act of 1975 to require Federal agencies 
 to impose certain requirements on recipients of awards for scientific 
                       and engineering research.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

     Section 12(b) of the Metric Conversion Act of 1975 (15 U.S.C. 
205j-1(b)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(b) Guidelines established under subsection (a) shall require 
that any transaction between the Federal agency and another person 
providing for such person to perform scientific or engineering research 
with Federal funding include provisions--
            ``(1) clearly identifying the extent to which the metric 
        system of measurement or other systems of measurement will be 
        used under the transaction;
            ``(2) requiring the usage of systems of measurement 
        consistent with the provisions described in paragraph (1); and
            ``(3) assigning to the person receiving Federal funding the 
        financial responsibility for failure to follow the requirements 
        stated in paragraph (2).''.
                                 <all>
```
**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC  ACCOUNTANTS**

  To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees  Saturna Investment Trust  We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of the  Sextant Short-Term Bond Fund, Sextant Bond Income Fund, Sextant Growth Fund  and Sextant International Fund, each a series of the Saturna Investment Trust,  including the schedules of investments as of November 30, 2000, and the related  statements of operations for the year then ended, and the changes in net assets  for each of the two years then ended, and the financial highlights for each  of the four years then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights  are the responsibility of the Trust’s management. Our responsibility is  to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights  based on our audits. The financial statements and financial highlights presented  for the year ended November 30, 1996 were audited by other auditors whose report  dated December 18, 1996, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements.  We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable  assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are  free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,  evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of November 30,  2000, by correspondence with the custodian. Our audit also includes assessing  the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,  as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe  that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.   In our opinion the financial statements and financial highlights referred to  above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sextant  Short-Term Bond Fund, Sextant Bond Income Fund, Sextant Growth Fund, and Sextant  International Fund, as of November 30, 2000, the results of their operations  for the year then ended, and the changes in their net assets for each of the  two years then ended and their financial highlights for each of the four years  in the period then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

**TAIT, WELLER &  BAKER**

/s/signature

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  December 15, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5207 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5207

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the amount of the 
            military death gratuity from $12,000 to $75,000.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 4, 2004

 Mr. Fossella (for himself and Mr. Cox) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the amount of the 
            military death gratuity from $12,000 to $75,000.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN DEATH GRATUITY PAYABLE WITH RESPECT TO MEMBERS 
              OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) Amount of Death Gratuity.--Section 1478(a) of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``$12,000'' and inserting 
``$75,000''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to deaths occurring on or after September 11, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
Consumer Price Index, Bureau of Labor Statistics, February 2015 

Consumer Price Index: Changes in Seasonal Adjustment Status for 2015

These items are changing to Seasonally Adjusted:

Item code Title 

CUUR0000SS0501A 

CUUR0000SEFS02

CWUR0000 SEFS02

Lunchmeats 

Salad dressing 

CUUR0000SEEE03 

CWUR0000SEEE03

Internet services and electronic information providers 

CUUR0000SEHN01 

CWUR0000SEHN01

CUUR0000SEGA

CWUR0000SEGA

CUUR0000SEGA01

CWUR0000SEGA01 

Household cleaning products 

Tobacco and smoking products 

Cigarettes

CUUR0000SEEC02

CWUR0000SEEC02

CUUR0000SAH31 

CWUR0000SAH31

CUUR0000SS20022

CUUR0000SEFG01

CWUR0000SEFG01

CUUR0000SAD

CWUR0000SAD

CUUR0000SEFN03

CWUR0000SEFN03

Delivery services

Household furnishings and supplies

Distilled spirits, excluding whiskey, at home

Fresh fish and seafood

Durables

Nonfrozen noncarbonated juices and drinks
Consumer Price Index, Bureau of Labor Statistics, February 2015 

These items are changing to Not Seasonally Adjusted: 

Item code Title 

CUUR0000SEFJ04 

CWUR0000SEFJ04

CUUR0000SEFF01

CWUR0000SEFF01

CUUR0000SEGD02

CWUR0000SEGD02

CUUR0000SS20021

CUUR0000SS53022 

Other dairy and related products 

Chicken

Funeral expenses

Whiskey at home

Intercity train fare
**Exhibit 23.1**
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.333-42996, No. 333-106503, and No. 333-125511) and Form S-3 (No. 333-106078) and No. 333-125069) ofOmniVision Technologies, Inc. of our report dated July 14, 2005 relating to the financialstatements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting,which appears in this Form 10-K.
**/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP**
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Page



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northeast Bancorp (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), James D. Delamater, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,that:



(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|November 14, 2002 | /s/ James D. Delamater
|----------------- | ----------------------
|                  | James D. Delamater    
|                  | President and CEO
**Exhibit 8.1**

----

**Schedule of Subsidiary Companies as at 17 January 2003**

| **Company Name**                               | **Country** |
|------------------------------------------------|-------------|
| Last Minute SPRL                               | Belgium     |
| Travelprice Belgium SA                         | Belgium     |
| Travelprice Voyagistes Canada      Inc         | Canada      |
| Last Minute A/S                                | Denmark     |
| Travelprice A/S                                | Denmark     |
| Last Minute Network SARL                       | France      |
| Travelprice SAS                                | France      |
| Travelprice.com SA                             | France      |
| Voyages sur Mesures SA                         | France      |
| Lastminute.com GmbH                            | Germany     |
| Travelprice Germany GmbH                       | Germany     |
| Last Minute Network Limited                    | Ireland     |
| Lastminute.com srl                             | Italy       |
| Travelprice Italia srl                         | Italy       |
| Lastminute.com BV                              | Netherlands |
| Urbanbite BV                                   | Netherlands |
| Last Minute A/S                                | Norway      |
| Lastminute Network SL                          | Spain       |
| Travelprice Spain SL                           | Spain       |
| Lastminute AB                                  | Sweden      |
| 4Less Limited                                  | UK          |
| Danube Travel Limited                          | UK          |
| Destination Australia Limited                  | UK          |
| Destination Caribbean Limited                  | UK          |
| Destination Far East Limited                   | UK          |
| Destination Holdings Group Limited             | UK          |
| Destination Malaysia Limited                   | UK          |
| Destination Pacific Limtied                    | UK          |
| Destination USA Limited                        | UK          |
| Exhilaration Incentive Management      Limited | UK          |
| Exhilaration Limited                           | UK          |
| Exhilaration Travel Limited                    | UK          |
| Globepost Limited                              | UK          |
| Holidays4Less Limited                          | UK          |
| Last Minute Network Limited                    | UK          |
| lastminute.com plc                             | UK          |
| The Destination Group Limited                  | UK          |
| Travel4Less Limited                            | UK          |
| Travelprice Limited                            | UK          |
| Travelselect.com Limited                       | UK          |
| Urbanbite Limited                              | UK          |

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario Humberto VARELA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-10448.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 12, 2012.*

Filed Sept. 17, 2012.

*640Erica McCallum, Assistant U.S., Christina Marie Cabanillas, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Eric Scott Manch, Manch Law Firm PLLC, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: RAWLINSON, BYBEE, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Varela appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence that he contends was obtained during an unconstitutional investigative stop. We affirm.

The district court did not clearly err in concluding that Sifuentes’s testimony was credible. Contrary to Varela’s arguments, Sifuentes’s testimony was consistent with his initial report, albeit more detailed.

In light of his credible testimony, Si-fuentes had reasonable suspicion to stop the car driven by Varela, taking into account the totality of the circumstances, which included the following facts: (1) Si-fuentes was positioned in a remote area frequented by drug smugglers, and was within fifteen miles of the border; (2) a sensor alarm indicated that drug smugglers might be present in Sifuentes’s area; (8) Sifuentes determined, in light of “officer experience,” *United States v. Garcia-Barron,*116 F.3d 1305,1307 (9th Cir.1997), that a tip from the driver of a Chevy Blazer was a ruse intended to cause Si-fuentes to leave the area so he would not see Varela’s vehicle; and (4) Sifuentes determined, again in light of “officer experience,” *id.,*that tape-wrapped bundles in the car driven by Varela were bricks of marijuana. *See United States v. Arvizu,*534 U.S. 266, 269-70, 273, 277, 122 S.Ct. 744, 151 L.Ed.2d 740 (2002).

We reject Varela’s argument that the district court’s reliance on certain factors (such as Varela’s failure to acknowledge Sifuentes, and Varela’s orange hunting cap) was impermissible. The Supreme Court has prohibited courts “from adopting a ‘divide-and-conquer analysis’ by looking at each factor in isolation and according it no weight if it is susceptible- to an innocent explanation.” *United States v. Berber-Tinoco,*510 F.3d 1083, 1088 (9th Cir.2007) (quoting *Arvizu,*534 U.S. at 274, 122 S.Ct. 744). And in any event, the remaining factors supported a determination that Sifuentes had reasonable suspicion.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
BE IT REMEMBERED:

THAT at the term of the Honorable Court of Appeals for the Tenth District of the State of Texas, begun and holden at Waco on the 1st day of January, 2015, present Chief Justice TOM GRAY and Justices REX D. DAVIS and AL SCOGGINS

In the cause

No. 10-15-00287-CR

IN RE BRIAN DAMON WARD

Original Proceeding

the following Judgment was entered on the 10th day of September, 2015:

“Came on to be heard on the original Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed in this Court on August 27, 2015, by Relator Brian Damon Ward, and the same having been considered, because it is the opinion of the Court that the Petition for Writ of Mandamus should be dismissed; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Petition for Writ of Mandamus be, and hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.  It is further ordered that the Relator Brian Damon Ward, pay all costs in this behalf expended and incurred in this Court.”

I, SHARRI ROESSLER, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the Tenth District of Texas, at the City of Waco, hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Judgment entered herein by this Court in the above entitled and numbered cause as appears of record in Minute Book 13, Page 621.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and affix the seal of said Court at Waco, this 10th day of September A.D. 2015.

SHARRI ROESSLER, Clerk

By: ______________________________________

Nita Whitener, Deputy Clerk

# image1.png

# image2.jpeg
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

(A Pennsylvania Limited Liability Partnership) 

502 Carnegie Center 

Princeton, NJ 08540 

(609) 919-6609/6656 

Richard G. Rosenblatt 

Valerie E. Manos 

Attorneys for Defendant Cognizant 

Technology Solutions Corporation 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

VASSILIKI KOUKOUTAS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY 

SOLUTIONS, INC. a corporation, 

Defendants.

Civil Docket No. 2:11-cv-03091-SDW-MCA 

DEFENDANT’S RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE 

STATEMENT 

Document Filed Electronically 

 Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and to enable judges and 

magistrate judges of the Court to evaluate possible disqualification and recusal, the undersigned 

counsel of record for Defendant Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (incorrectly 

named in the complaint as “Cognizant Technology Solutions, Inc.”) states that Cognizant 

Technology Solutions Corporation is a publicly traded company which has no parent 

corporation, and there are no publicly held corporations that own 10% or more of its stock. 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

Attorneys for Defendant Cognizant Technology 

Solutions Corporation 

/s/ Valerie E. Manos 

 Richard G. Rosenblatt 

 Valerie E. Manos 

Dated: June 1, 2011 

Case 2:11-cv-03091-SDW-MCA Document 2 Filed 06/01/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 20
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of Defendant’s Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement 

was served this 1st day of June, 2011, via the Court’s Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) system and 

First Class Mail upon the following: 

Alan Krumholz 

Krumholz Dillon, P.A. 

574 Summit Ave., Suite 402 

Jersey City, NJ 07306 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

 s/ Valerie E. Manos 

 Valerie E. Manos 

Case 2:11-cv-03091-SDW-MCA Document 2 Filed 06/01/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 21
1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United Stat es District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-2609

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Gregory Dell Johnson, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 27, 2009 Filed: November 2, 2009

___________ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Gregory Johnson (Johnson) challenges the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pled guilty to a drug crime. His counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he seek s permission to withdraw, arguing that the district court erred in determini ng the amount of drugs attributable to Johnson which resulted in a 120-month statutory minimum. Johnson filed a pro se supplemental brief reiterating this argument.-2- We enforce the appeal waiv er in this case. SeeUnited States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-90 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (deciding our court will enforce an appeal waiver in a plea agreement wh en the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, both waiver and plea agreement were ente red into knowingly and voluntarily, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a mi scarriage of justice). This appeal falls within the scope of the waiver containe d in Johnson’s plea agreement, the record shows the requisite knowledge and voluntariness, and wediscover nothing to suggest a miscarriage of justice would result fro m enforcing the appeal waiver. See United States v. Chacon , 330 F.3d 1065, 1066 (8th Cir. 2003) (holding the only authority for a district court to depart from a statut ory minimum sentence is found in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) and (f), which apply only when the government makes a motion for substantial assistance or the defenda nt qualifies for safety-valve relief).
We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we dismiss the appeal.

______________________________
Case 3:10-cr-00640-PGS Document 28 Filed 02/16/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 29
Case 3:10-cr-00640-PGS Document 28 Filed 02/16/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 30
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                         WASHINGTON, D. C.   20549



                                 FORM 8-K


                             CURRENT REPORT

                  PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE 
                     SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934




      DATE OF REPORT  (date of earliest event reported ) :  1/8/96

                           BETHEL BANCORP
           (exact name of registrant as specified in charter)


    Maine                 01-16123                      01-0425066
(State or other        (Commission File               (IRS Employer
Jurisdiction of         Number)                        Identification
Incorporation                                          Number)


     489 Congress Street, Portland, Maine               04101
   (Address of principal executive offices)          (Zip Code)

  REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE:   (207) 772-8587

    (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)


ITEM  5  Other Events
_____________________

     On Monday, January 8, 1996, the President of Bethel Bancorp (the 
"Company"), James D. Delamater, announced that the Company, subject to the 
receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, intends to merge the Company's two 
wholly-owned banking subsidiaries, Bethel Savings Bank F.S.B. and Brunswick 
Federal Savings Bank, F.A.  (the "Bank Subsidiaries").  The proposed merger was
approved by the Boards of Directors of the two Bank Subsidiaries on January 3, 
1996.  The resulting bank, which will be known as Northeast Bank, F. S. B. will
have assets of over $200,000,000 and will operate eight branches in four Maine 
counties.  The Bank Subsidiaries intend to apply to the Office of Thrift 
Supervision for approval of the proposed merger immediately.

     On the same day, Mr. Delamater announced that the Company intends to 
change its name to Northeast Bancorp upon the merger of its two Bank 
Subsidiaries and at the same time to change the symbol under which its stock 
trades on The Nasdaq Stock Market to NEBC.



                         SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the 
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the 
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                     Bethel Bancorp
                                     (Registrant)

                               By:    /s/ James D. Delamater
                                      James D. Delamater
                                      Its President


January 12, 1996
(Date)