alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Joseph P. La Sala 

MCELROY, DEUTSCH, MULVANEY &

 CARPENTER, LLP

1300 Mount Kemble Avenue

P.O. Box 2075

Morristown, NJ 07962-2075 

Tel.: (973) 993-8100

Fax: (973) 425-0161

Jlasala@mdmc-law.com

Attorneys for Defendants Express Scripts, Inc., Aristotle Holding, Inc., Aristotle Merger Sub, 

Inc. and Plato Merger Sub, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN RE:

MEDCO/EXPRESS SCRIPTS MERGER 

LITIGATION

Civil Action No. 11-4211 (DMC) 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Joseph P. La Sala, Esq., certify that on October 11, 2011, I served true and accurate

copies of the Express Scripts' Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion for

Certification Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and Stay Pending Appeal, the October 11, 2011

Certification of Joseph P. La Sala, Esq. in Further Support of its Motion for Certification

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and Stay Pending Appeal with Exhibit A, and this Certificate of

Service upon all counsel of record in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and

the electronic filing rules of the United States District Court, District of New Jersey. 

Dated: October 11, 2011 /s/ Joseph P. La Sala

Joseph P. La Sala

Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 74-3 Filed 10/11/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 2817
Case 2:11-cv-04529-JLL-MAH Document 9 Filed 09/19/11 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 333
Case 2:11-cv-04529-JLL-MAH Document 9 Filed 09/19/11 Page 2 of 16 PageID: 334
Case 2:11-cv-04529-JLL-MAH Document 9 Filed 09/19/11 Page 3 of 16 PageID: 335
Case 2:11-cv-04529-JLL-MAH Document 9 Filed 09/19/11 Page 4 of 16 PageID: 336
Case 2:11-cv-04529-JLL-MAH Document 9 Filed 09/19/11 Page 5 of 16 PageID: 337
Case 2:11-cv-04529-JLL-MAH Document 9 Filed 09/19/11 Page 6 of 16 PageID: 338
Case 2:11-cv-04529-JLL-MAH Document 9 Filed 09/19/11 Page 7 of 16 PageID: 339
Case 2:11-cv-04529-JLL-MAH Document 9 Filed 09/19/11 Page 8 of 16 PageID: 340
Case 2:11-cv-04529-JLL-MAH Document 9 Filed 09/19/11 Page 9 of 16 PageID: 341
Case 2:11-cv-04529-JLL-MAH Document 9 Filed 09/19/11 Page 10 of 16 PageID: 342
Case 2:11-cv-04529-JLL-MAH Document 9 Filed 09/19/11 Page 11 of 16 PageID: 343
Case 2:11-cv-04529-JLL-MAH Document 9 Filed 09/19/11 Page 12 of 16 PageID: 344
Case 2:11-cv-04529-JLL-MAH Document 9 Filed 09/19/11 Page 13 of 16 PageID: 345
Case 2:11-cv-04529-JLL-MAH Document 9 Filed 09/19/11 Page 14 of 16 PageID: 346
Case 2:11-cv-04529-JLL-MAH Document 9 Filed 09/19/11 Page 15 of 16 PageID: 347
Case 2:11-cv-04529-JLL-MAH Document 9 Filed 09/19/11 Page 16 of 16 PageID: 348
Exhibit 12.1

CEO SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Arthur J. Young, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of PSi Technologies Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of
companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys
internal control over financial reporting.



By:

/S/    ARTHUR J. YOUNG,
JR.Name:

Arthur J. Young, Jr.Title:

Chief Executive OfficerAugust 16, 2006
Case 2:11-cr-00421-SDW Document 12 Filed 02/28/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 15
Case 2:11-cr-00421-SDW Document 12 Filed 02/28/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 16
Case 2:11-cr-00421-SDW Document 12 Filed 02/28/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 17
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Grace 7,
      Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ending February 29,
      2008 (the “Report”), I, Virginia K. Sourlis, the Chief Executive Officer and
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      April 3, 2008





By:
            /s/
              Virginia K. SourlisVirginia
                K. Sourlis
              Chief
                Executive Officer and
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)
Case 2:11-cv-03213-SDW Document 4 Filed 09/14/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 31
Case 2:11-cv-03213-SDW Document 4 Filed 09/14/11 Page 2 of 10 PageID: 32
Case 2:11-cv-03213-SDW Document 4 Filed 09/14/11 Page 3 of 10 PageID: 33
Case 2:11-cv-03213-SDW Document 4 Filed 09/14/11 Page 4 of 10 PageID: 34
Case 2:11-cv-03213-SDW Document 4 Filed 09/14/11 Page 5 of 10 PageID: 35
Case 2:11-cv-03213-SDW Document 4 Filed 09/14/11 Page 6 of 10 PageID: 36
Case 2:11-cv-03213-SDW Document 4 Filed 09/14/11 Page 7 of 10 PageID: 37
Case 2:11-cv-03213-SDW Document 4 Filed 09/14/11 Page 8 of 10 PageID: 38
Case 2:11-cv-03213-SDW Document 4 Filed 09/14/11 Page 9 of 10 PageID: 39
Case 2:11-cv-03213-SDW Document 4 Filed 09/14/11 Page 10 of 10 PageID: 40
Exhibit 10.22

FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE  dated for reference purposes, as of January 23, 2002  by and between  MONROVIA TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS LLC,  a California limited liability company ("Landlord")  and
SEEBEYOND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION ("Tenant").

R E C I T A L S:

A.    Pursuant
to that certain Lease dated as of November 28, 2000, between Landlord and Tenant ("Lease"), Landlord
agreed to construct and lease to Tenant that certain improved premises located at 800 Royal Oaks, Monrovia, California (unless otherwise specified herein, all terms are used herein as defined in the
Lease).

B.    Landlord
and Tenant hereby amend the Lease as follows;



---









---

A G R E E M E N T:

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein and in the Lease and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as above:

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment as of the day and year first above written.

|LANDLORD:                              |                                                 | TENANT:             
|-------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- | --------------------
|MONROVIA TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS LLC         |                                                 | SEEBEYOND TECHNOLOGY
|a California limited liability company |                                                 | CORPORATION         
|By:                                    | /s/ Blaine P. FetterBlaine P. Fetter, Manager   |                     
|By:                                    | /s/ Reid G. SamuelsonReid G. Samuelson, Manager |                     

---

QuickLinks
EX-10.9



 Exhibit 10.9 
  





 
 December 22, 2008 
 Joseph S. Tibbetts, Jr. 
 ******** 
 ******** 
  

	Re:	Amendment to Your Offer Letter 

 Dear
Joe: 
 Sapient Corporation (“Sapient”) is fast approaching the December, 31, 2008 deadline for documentary compliance
with IRC §409A. In reviewing our executive employment arrangements to assure they comply with IRC §409A, we noted that your offer letter dated October 16, 2006 (the “Offer Letter”), which you signed after the Internal
Revenue Service published the IRC §409A final regulations, contains a severance provision that requires modification to comply with IRC §409A. As such, we propose to amend your Offer Letter by adding the following after subsection
(e) in the paragraph that addresses “Good Reason” (the “Offer Letter Amendment”): 
 “You shall
provide written notice to the Company within sixty (60) days of the occurrence of any event that constitutes Good Reason for terminating your employment and you shall set forth, in reasonable detail, the nature of the event constituting Good
Reason (the “Notice”). The Company will have thirty (30) days from receipt of the Notice to cure the event specified in the Notice, and if it fails to do so, your employment will terminate for Good Reason on the first day following
the expiration of such thirty (30) day cure period.” 
 In addition to seeking your approval of the Offer Letter
Amendment, we hereby request that in the event additional changes to your offer letter or other employment related agreements are necessary to comply with IRC §409A, you authorize Sapient to amend these agreements accordingly, subject to
providing you written notice of, and an opportunity to object to, the proposed amendments. 
 If you agree to the foregoing,
please sign and date this letter in the signature box, below, and return a fully executed copy of the letter to me. 
 Except as
amended herein, all other terms and conditions in your Offer Letter shall remain in full force and effect and you continue to be employed on an “at-will” basis, which means that you are free, at any time, for any reason, to end your
employment with Sapient and Sapient may do the same. 
  
 



 








	
	Best regards,
	
	Sapient Corporation
	
	/s/ Alan Herrick
	  

	By: Alan Herrick
	
	Accepted and Agreed:
	
	 /s/ Joseph S. Tibbetts, Jr.

	Joseph S. Tibbetts, Jr.
	
	Date: 12/22/2008


  
 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 28, 2013

p1021 

# Order

Clerk October 28, 2013

147035

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147035

COA: 308964

Ingham CC: 11

- 000849

- FC

ADAM RUSSELL WEAVER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 19, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it i s DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7019

LEO L. MADDOX,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID ODOM, Hearing Officer; MARIA BLANDSHAW,

I.A.C. Staff Coordinator, in their official

and individual capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-94-1835-3-18BC)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leo L. Maddox, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Arlen Cotter, Jr., Benjamin

Davis McCoy, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN, GRIER & HOWSER, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Maddox v. Odom,

No. CA-94-1835-3-18BC (D.S.C. June 13, 1995). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### SHIMER v. AMERICAN OIL CO.

No. 3721.

District Court, M. D. Pennsylvania.

March 13, 1944.

Deane Ramey, of New York City, and William L. Showers, of Lewisburg, xPa., for plaintiff.

Frank M. Walsh, of Scranton, Pa., for ■defendant.

WATSON, District Judge.

This is a motion filed February 4, 1944, to vacate and set aside nonsuit entered March 30, 1937.

This suit was commenced March 27, 1935. The plaintiff alleged that he sustained injuries in a building owned, occupied, maintained, operated and controlled by defendant. The affidavit of defense by the defendant denied that the building was at the time occupied, maintained, or managed by it, averring that it was in the sole and exclusive control and possession of a tenant under a lease. The nonsuit was properly entered seven years ago. I have carefully examined the record in the case. It clearly shows that, under any view, the plaintiff was guilty of laches, and to allow the motion at this late date would be highly prejudicial to the rights of and would work a grave injustice upon the defendant.

Plaintiff’s motion was not only not made within a reasonable time, but it was not made within six months, which is the dead line under 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

The motion to have set aside the nonsuit entered March 30, 1937, is denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                              CERTIFICATION BY THE
      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
                                  ACT OF 2002

I, E. Leon Daniel, Chief Executive Officer, of Ivanhoe Energy Inc, hereby
certify that:

(a)   our periodic report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
"FORM 10-K"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related interpretations; and

(b)   the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and our results of operations.

                                      * * *

Chief Executive Officer

By: /s/  E. Leon Daniel
    --------------------------------------
    E. Leon Daniel

March 3, 2005

                                       88
##### 



Exhibit 12.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT I, Srinivas V., certify that:  1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Satyam Computer Services
Limited;2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.

The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:  (a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.

The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys
auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  (a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over
financial reporting. Dated this April 26, 2005. By:
    /s/  Srinivas V.Director and Senior Vice President &Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in these Registration Statements onForm S-8 (No. 333-36464, No. 333-107957, No. 333-117958 and No. 333-129691) of our report dated March 13, 2006 relating to the consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, of Embarcadero Technologies, Inc., which appears in this Form 10-K. 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Jose, California 

March 15, 2006
Case 2:11-cv-03240-SDW-MCA Document 3 Filed 06/08/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 43
[No. 55024-1-I.

Division One.

November 21, 2005.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Tod Alan Bullard, *Appellant,*and Wendy Marie Bullard, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 03-3-01121-7, David F. Hulbert, J., entered September 2, 2004. *Remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(ii), it is hereby stipulated, by

and between counsel for Plaintiff, Elena Montanez, and Defendant, Academy Collection

Services Inc. f’k/a Monarch Recovery Management, Inc., that this action and all of the

claims set forth therein are dismissed with prejudice.

/s/ Amy L. Bennecoff

Amy L. Bennecoff, Esquire

Kimmel & Silverman, P.C.30 East Butler Avenue

Ambler, PA 19002

(215)540-8888

abennecoff)creditlaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff,

Elena IVontanez

/s/ Rocco Casale

Rocco Casale, Esquire

Stevens & Schwab

100 Connell Drive, Suite 100

Berkeley Heights, NJ 07922

(908) 679-4999

Rocco .casalechartisinsurance.com

Attorney for Defendant,Academy Collection Services Inc.

f/kia Monarch Recovery

Management, Inc.

ELENA MONTANEZ.

Plaintiff

V.

ACADEMY COLLECTION SERVICES,

INC. fYk/a MONARCH RECOVERY

MANAGEMENT, INC.,

Defendant

CASE NO: 2:1 l-cv-03661

)

)

)

)

)))

)

))

)

))
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4958 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4958

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a sale of oil and 
gas leases on certain submerged lands of the outer Continental Shelf in 
                      the Eastern Gulf of Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2004

   Mr. John introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a sale of oil and 
gas leases on certain submerged lands of the outer Continental Shelf in 
                      the Eastern Gulf of Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Energy Independence for a Strong 
America Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. LEASE SALE REQUIRED.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall, as soon as practicable after 
the date of the enactment of this Act and under section 8 of the Outer 
Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337), conduct a sale of oil and 
gas leases on all submerged lands of the outer Continental Shelf in the 
Eastern Gulf of Mexico that--
            (1) are depicted as ``Leased or Deferred--Not Offered'' on 
        the Minerals Management Service document entitled ``Eastern 
        Gulf of Mexico Lease Sale 181, December 2001 Lease Terms, 
        Economic Conditions, Stipulations, and Deferred Blocks for the 
        FINAL NOTICE OF SALE 181''; and
            (2) are not subject to a lease under that section.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 30 DB 2020 (No. 30 RST 2020)

:

GREGORY BRIAN PECCA, SR. : Attorney Registration No. 88997

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM RETIRED STATUS : ( Out of State )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6 th day of May

, 2020 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated April 24 , 2020

, is approved and it is ORDERED that

Gregory Brian Pecca, Sr.

, who has been on Retired Status

, has never been suspended

or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and

learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is,

hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The

expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall

be paid by the Petitioner.