alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Globalstar, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify that:
 
 This quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: August 5, 2011By:
/s/ James Monroe IIIJames Monroe IIIChief Executive OfficerDated: August 5, 2011By:
/s/ Dirk WildDirk WildChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Grace 2,
      Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ending November 30,
      2007 (the “Report”), I, Virginia K. Sourlis, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      to
      the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      January 9, 2008





By:
            /s/
                Virginia K. SourlisVirginia
              K. SourlisChief
              Executive Officer andChief
              Financial Officer ofGrace
              2, Inc.
Case 3:11-cv-03183-FLW-TJB Document 4-6 Filed 06/03/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 126
Case 2:11-mj-08143-MCA Document 4 Filed 07/14/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 7
|  | Principal Officers:Keith M. Braaten, P. Eng.  President & CEOJodi L. Anhorn, P. Eng.  Executive Vice President & COO Officers / Vice Presidents:Terry L. Aarsby, P. Eng.Caralyn P. Bennett, P. Eng.Leonard L. Herchen, P. Eng.Myron J. Hladyshevsky, P. Eng.Bryan M. Joa, P. Eng.Mark Jobin, P. Geol.John E. Keith, P. Eng.John H. Stilling, P. Eng.Douglas R. Sutton, P. Eng.James H. Willmon, P. Eng. |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Yours very truly,                  |
|------------------------------------|
|                               |
| GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.     |
|                               |
| “Originally Signed by” |
|                               |
| Tracy K. Bellingham, P. Eng.       |
| Senior Engineer                    |
|                               |
| “Originally Signed by” |
|                               |
| Caralyn P. Bennett, P. Eng.        |
| Vice President                     |

----
Case 3:10-cr-00398-PGS Document 35 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 198
---

CERTIFICATIONS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of 24 Hour Auction
  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10KSB for the period ended August 31, 2003,
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date, the undersigned,
  being the Chief Executive Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
  2002, that:

|1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: September 17, 2004 | Signed: | /s/
      Robin Lee                                    
|------------------------ | ------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|                         | Name:   | Robin Lee                                              
|                         | Title:  | Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer



---
#### Cottle *v.*Krementz and others.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

May 13, 1887.)

Patents for Inventions—Patentability—Novelty—Collar and Sleeve Buttons.

Letters patent No. 202,412, dated April 16, 1878, to Shubael Cottle, for im- - provemeut in collar and sleeve buttons, contained two claims,—one for the making- of such buttons by striking- up the post from the back, forming them in one piece, thickening- the post at the base for strength, and soldering the head to the post; the other for the button, whose tubular back and post are formed in one piece, and having the metal thickened at the base of the post. *Hetd,*that the first claim was patentable for novelty in method of construction, but that the claim for the button itself was not.

In Equity. Bill for infringement of letters patent.

*W. H. L. Lee,*for orator.

*Frederic H. Betts*and *J. E. Hindon Hyde,*for defendants.

*43Wheeler, J.

This causo rests upon patent for invention No. 202,412, dated April 16,1878, issued to the orator for an improvement in the construction of collar and sleeve buttons. The specification describes the making of such buttons by striking up the post from the back, forming them in one piece, thickening the post at the base for strength, and soldering the head to tho post. There are two claims,—one for the improved process oí'constructing the button; and the other for the button, whose tubular post and back are formed in one piece, and having the metal thickened at the base of the post. The defendants’ buttons are formed wholly in *one piece,*but without using the orator’s process. The patent describes tho prior method of making such buttons, which was to make the head, back, and post separately, and then unite them by soldering them together; and their defects, wliich were that frequently they wore imperfectly united. When well made, they were not essentially different in form or function from those made according to the patent, or those of the defendants. The thickening of the post at the base is not material. They were generally strong enough there before; but, if not, the strengthening of them at that place would be too obvious to support a patent for doing that. Tho orator invented a mode of making such buttons which was new and very useful, and for wliich he deservedly had a patent; but tho buttons, when made, wore not new, except that they were made by that new mode. For them there was no ground for a patent. In the old buttons the post and back were not formed of one piece, but when they had been united, and become, with the head, a button, they were of one piece for the purposes of the button, as much as if they had always been in one piece. The thing patented in this part of the patent was not new, and this part of the patent is, apparently, invalid on that account. *The Wood Paper Patent,*23 Wall. 563; *Cochrane*v. *Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik,*111 U. S. 293, 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 455; *McKloskey*v. *Du Bois,*8 Fed. Rep. 710, and 9 Fed. Rep. 38; *McCloskey*v. *Hamill,*15 Fed. Rep. 750.

Let a decree he entered dismissing the bill of complaint, with costs.
**Exhibit32.1**

**UNIVERSALCOMPRESSION PARTNERS, L.P.CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report* of Universal Compression Partners, L.P. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Stephen A.Snider, Chief Executive Officer of the general partner of the Company’s generalpartner, UCO GP, LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ STEPHEN A. SNIDER                                       |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Stephen A. Snider                                           |
| Chief Executive Officer, UCO GP, LLC                        |
| As General Partner of UCO General Partner, LP               |
| As General Partner of Universal Compression  Partners, L.P. |

May9, 2007

In connection with theQuarterly Report* of Universal Compression Partners, L.P. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Daniel K.Schlanger, Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of the Company’sgeneral partner, UCO GP, LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ DANIEL K. SCHLANGER                                     |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Daniel K. Schlanger                                         |
| Chief Financial Officer, UCO GP, LLC                        |
| As General Partner of UCO General Partner, LP               |
| As General Partner of Universal Compression  Partners, L.P. |

May9, 2007

----

*                    Thisreport presents the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant and the results of operations and cash flow of the registrant’spredecessor, the natural gas contract compression business that is provided inthe United States of America by Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. and itssubsidiaries.

27

----
EXHIBIT 23.2





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS







We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-113054, 333-143029, 333-151943 and 333-168964 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 15, 2012, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (which report expressed an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding conditions and events that cast substantial doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern) and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2011.





/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


Independent Registered Chartered Accountants


Calgary, Canada


March 15, 2012
EXHIBIT 32





<PAGE>


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tian'an Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  Weng  Jianjun,  the
Principal  Executive Officer and Zhu Jie, the Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of their knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


                                 TIAN'AN PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.



August 9, 2007                    /s/ Weng Jianjun
                                  -------------------------------------
                                  Weng Jianjun, Principal Executive Officer


August 9, 2007                    /s/ Zhu Jie
                                  ------------------------------------
                                  Zhu Jie, Principal Financial and Accounting
                                  Officer
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF


DENARII RESOURCES INC.


FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Dr. Stewart A. Jackson, am the Chief Executive Officer of Denarii Resources Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the nine month period ended September  30, 2010 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 17, 2010
By:
/s/ Dr. Stewart A. JacksonDr. Stewart A. JacksonChief Executive Officer, President Secretary,

and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 108-1 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 6766
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 108-1 Filed 01/23/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 6767
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1664]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Neurological Sciences Training Initial Review 
Group; NST-1 Subcommittee.
    Date: January 26-27, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Renaissance Mayflower Hotel, 1127 Connecticut Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20036.
    Contact Person: Raul A. Saavedra, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, 
NINDS/NIH/DHHS, NSC; 6001 Executive Blvd., Ste. 3208, Bethesda, MD 
20892-9529, 301-496-9223, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b4c7d5d5c2d1d0c6c6f4dadddad0c79adadddc9ad3dbc2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fb889a9a8d9e9f8989bb9592959f88d5959293d59c948d">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 16, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
 [FR Doc. E9-1664 Filed 1-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 2:11-cv-01586-KM Document 2 Filed 06/22/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 22
Case 2:11-cv-01586-KM Document 2 Filed 06/22/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 23
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES OFCLICK COMMERCE, INC.**

Click Commerce BV, a wholly-owned subsidiary organizedunder the laws of the Netherlands

Click Commerce Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiaryorganized under the laws of the United Kingdom

Click Commerce GmbH, a wholly-owned subsidiaryorganized under the laws of Germany

Allegis Acquisition, Inc. a wholly-ownedsubsidiary organized under the laws of Delaware

AllegisCorporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Allegis Acquisition, Inc.organized under the laws of California

Allegis Ltd., awholly-owned subsidiary of Allegis Corporation organized under the laws of theUnited Kingdom

Click West Coast Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiaryorganized under the laws of Delaware

Click-Webridge, Inc.,a wholly-owned subsidiary of West Coast Corp., organized under the laws ofDelaware

Click Texas Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary organizedunder the laws of Delaware

bTrade, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of ClickTexas Corp., organized under the laws of Texas

CWV Acquisition, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiaryorganized under the laws of Delaware

Optum, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of.organized under the laws of Delaware

Optum, BV, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Optum, Inc.organized under the laws of the Netherlands

Xelus Acqusition, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiaryorganized under the laws of Delaware

Click Commerce SPO, Inc.,a wholly-owned subsidiary of Xelus Acquistion, Inc. organized under thelaws of Delaware

Xelus, Ltd, awholly-owned subsidiary of Click Commerce SPO, Inc. organized under thelaws of the United Kingdom

Requisite Technology, Inc., a wholly-ownedsubsidiary organized under the laws of Delaware

RequisiteTechnology Canada, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Requisite Technology, Inc.organized under the laws of Canada

RequisiteTechnology GmbH, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Requisite Technology, Inc.organized under the laws of Germany

RequisiteTechnology Ltd, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Requisite Technology, Inc.organized under the laws of the United Kingdom

Click Procure, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiaryorganized under the laws of Delaware

Elance UK, Ltd, awholly-owned subsidiary of Click Procure, Inc. organized under the laws ofthe United Kingdom

Elance SoftwareTechnologies (India) Private Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ClickProcure, Inc. organized under the laws of India

----
#### TINKER v. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, Inc., et al.

Civ. No. 26778.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

June 30, 1950.

See, also, 9 F.R.D. 703.

*373John H. Watson, Jr., Robert W. Wheeler, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Edward Crocker (of McKeehan, Merrick, Arter & Stewart) and M. C. Harrison, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants.

FREED, District Judge.

The action is for wrongful death arising out of an airplane accident occurring in Wisconsin. Defendant Martin moves to strike certain matter from the complaint, for a statement in separate counts, and for a dismissal of the second cause of action.

Assuming, arguendo, that the wrong measure of recovery has been stated, the motion to strike need not be granted. No prejudice to the defendant will result for the jury will be instructed on the correct measure of damages after all the facts are fully developed at trial and the pleadings need not necessarily be sent to the jury. Cf. Plummer v. Glenn L. Martin Co., D.C., 10 F.R.D. 395.

The separation of claims into individual counts is mandatory only where separation will facilitate clear presentation. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 10(b) 28 U.S.C.A. Assuming that the complaint intermingles four separate claims, as defendant contends, the fact that the defendant has been able to ascertain the precise nature of the claims against it demonstrates that little will be gained by requiring a separate statement. The matters raised in defendant’s brief on the present motion can be asserted in its answer. It should be parenthetically noted that a motion for summary judgment on the claim for pain and suffering before death may not be tenable for there may be a genuine issue as to the material fact of the time of decedent’s death which can only be resolved after all the facts are developed at trial.

The motion to dismiss is not well taken. If it transpires at trial that there is no cause of action in favor of the estate of the decedent, then the plaintiff is entitled to sue as an individual. It is therefore impossible to hold that the second count fails to state a claim. The cases cited by defendant deal with the requirements of state and not federal pleading.
Case 1:97-cv-05127-RBK-JS Document 1199 Filed 03/31/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 9056
Case 1:97-cv-05127-RBK-JS Document 1199 Filed 03/31/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 9057
#### Bruce Schwartz, Respondent, v Morse Business Machines Corporation et al., Appellants.

[853 NYS2d 887]

The defendants failed to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Accordingly, that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851 [1985]).

The defendants’ remaining contention is without merit. Mastro, J.P., Dickerson, Belen and Chambers, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

JOHN KEYS,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 5 EM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4

th day of April, 2023, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief 

is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 14, 2008
    /s/ Miguel B. FernandezMiguel B. FernandezChief Executive Officer