alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1




                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ThermoEnergy Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis
C. Cossey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Dennis C. Cossey
-------------------------------
Dennis C. Cossey
Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2002
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

35. Persons not in the labor force by desire and availability for work, age, and sex

[In thousands]

Category

Total Age Sex

2015 2016

16 to 24

years

25 to 54

years

55 years

and over Men Women

2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016

Total not in the labor force. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93,671 94,351 17,367 17,232 23,957 23,513 52,347 53,606 37,481 37,743 56,190 56,608

Do not want a job now1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87,589 88,502 15,525 15,452 21,344 21,032 50,719 52,018 34,681 35,009 52,907 53,492

Want a job1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,082 5,849 1,842 1,780 2,612 2,481 1,628 1,587 2,799 2,733 3,283 3,116

Did not search for work in previous

year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,454 3,415 1,030 994 1,357 1,353 1,067 1,069 1,507 1,522 1,947 1,894

Searched for work in previous year,

but not in past 4 weeks2. . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,628 2,434 812 787 1,256 1,128 561 519 1,292 1,211 1,336 1,222

Not available to work now. . . . . . . . . . . . 673 630 287 257 307 287 79 86 277 251 395 379

Marginally attached (available to

work now)3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,956 1,804 525 530 949 841 482 433 1,015 960 941 843

Discouraged over job

prospects4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 664 553 159 130 316 267 189 156 404 345 261 208

Reasons other than

discouragement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,291 1,250 366 400 632 573 293 277 611 615 680 635

Family responsibilities. . . . . . . . . . . 216 199 23 26 138 127 55 46 64 61 153 138

In school or training. . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 224 154 171 51 47 7 7 106 120 107 105

Ill health or disability. . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 144 16 16 77 67 75 62 84 77 84 67

Other5

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 695 682 174 187 366 333 155 162 358 356 337 326

1

Includes some persons who are not asked if they want a job.

2 Persons who had a job in the prior 12 months must have searched since the end of that job.

3 Persons ′′marginally attached to the labor force′′ are those who want a job, have searched for work during the prior 12 months, and were available to take a job during

the reference week, but had not looked for work in the past 4 weeks.

4 Discouraged workers are persons marginally attached to the labor force who did not actively look for work in the prior 4 weeks for reasons such as thinks no work

available, could not find work, lacks schooling or training, employer thinks too young or old, and other types of discrimination.

5

Includes those who did not actively look for work in the prior 4 weeks for such reasons as child-care and transportation problems, as well as a small number for which

reason for nonparticipation was not ascertained.

NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

1
#### PRICE v. CLEVELAND PNEUMATIC TOOL CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Jan. 28, 1943.

Kaye, Scholer, Fierman & Hays, of New York City (Benj. M. Kaye, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Hughes, Hubbard & Ewing, of New York City (George B. Schoonmaker, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

Defendant moves for leave 'to take depositions prior to answer in order to enable it to plead certain affirmative defenses. Pursuant to Rule 26(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, a motion of this character is addressed to the discretion of the court.

The three affirmative defenses which defendant contemplates interposing are (1) that neither plaintiff nor his assignee is the real party in interest; (2) the suit is brought on behalf of an alien enemy; and (3) the contract which is the basis of the suit has been modified and payment made pursuant to such modification.

The action is for royalties due under a royalty agreement executed between a partnership (of which plaintiff is a member) and the defendant, in Paris, France, in April, 1940.

The only issue before the court is whether the defendant is sufficiently informed of his proposed defenses so as to draw an adequate answer. From an examination of all the papers submitted, as well as the decision in Price v. Gestia et al.,1 opinion by Judge Collins, Supreme Court, New York County, Special Term, Part I, December 9, 1942, I conclude that the defendant can plead. To permit this examination at this time would in effect result in the defendant’s obtaining all the evidence necessary for a trial of the action or a motion for a stay. This is not the function of a deposition to be taken before answer.

After the joinder of issue defendant may examine without leave of the court. The motion is denied.

1

 No opinion for publication.
Exhibit 99.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual filing of GSI Technologies USA, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
October 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Rene Arbic and __________________, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company,
each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C.ss.1350), that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 4, 2003


Rene Arbic                        _____________________
Rene Arbic, CEO                   ________________, CFO



<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 539 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 539

    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the 
    admission to the United States for permanent residence without 
     numerical limitation of spouses of permanent resident aliens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2003

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the 
    admission to the United States for permanent residence without 
     numerical limitation of spouses of permanent resident aliens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADMISSION OF SPOUSES OF PERMANENT RESIDENT ALIENS WITHOUT 
              NUMERICAL LIMITATION.

    (a) Removing Spouses of Permanent Resident Aliens From Provisions 
Relating to Family-Sponsored Immigrants.--Section 203(a)(2) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in the paragraph heading by striking ``Spouses and'';
            (2) in subparagraph (A) by striking ``spouses or''.
    (b) Adding Spouses of Permanent Resident Aliens to List of Aliens 
Not Subject to Direct Numerical Limitations.--Section 201(b)(2) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151(b)(2)) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(C) Spouses of permanent resident aliens.''.
    (c) Procedure for Granting Immigrant Status.--Section 
204(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1154(a)(1)(A)(ii)) is amended by inserting ``or section 201(b)(2)(C)'' 
after ``201(b)(2)(A)(i))''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.30

 

[ServiceMaster letterhead]

 

November 19, 2012

 

Mr. David Martin

 

Dear David:

 

We are pleased to extend this offer of the position of Interim Chief Financial Officer for The ServiceMaster Company.  In this interim role you will report to Hank Mullany, the President and Chief Executive Officer of ServiceMaster.  Your effective start date is November 28, 2012.  When a new Chief Financial Officer is hired you will return to your current role, responsibilities and compensation if you are not selected as the final candidate.

 

Compensation:  During the period of service as the Interim CFO, in addition to your regular salary, you will be paid an additional $10,000 per month. For the period from November 28th through November 30th you will receive a pro-rated amount of $1,000.  Regardless of the length of service, you will be paid a minimum of $70,000 for performing this role.  At the end of your service as Interim CFO this additional salary will cease.

 

Your bonus target under the 2012 and 2013 Annual Bonus Plan (“ABP”) will be adjusted up to 65% of your salary during your service as Interim CFO.  Regardless of the length of your service, you will receive a minimum incremental award of $50,000 for plan year 2013 payable in March 2014.  All payments will be made subject to and in accordance with ABP rules.  At the end of your service as Interim CFO your bonus target will revert to your current 50%.

 

All compensation, including bonus and incentive payments will be subject to applicable payroll deductions.

 

Additional Conditions:  Participation in these compensation plans is contingent on your re-execution of a ServiceMaster Non-Compete/Non-Solicitation/Confidentiality agreement and your agreement to utilize ServiceMaster’s alternative dispute resolution program We Listen to resolve any and all work-related disputes/concerns and to arbitrate such disputes if they are not resolved.  Full details regarding the We Listen program are available from your HR representative.

 

Please note that this letter shall not constitute an employment contract, and nothing herein changes the terms of the employment agreement or your status as an at-will employee.

 

We look forward to you fulfilling one of ServiceMaster’s key executive roles during this important period.  We believe that you will make a valuable contribution to our team and the organization.

 

If you accept this offer, please sign the acceptance below and return it to me within five days of the offer date.  If you have any questions, please feel free to call me.

 











 

	
Sincerely,
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   Jed Norden
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Jed   Norden
    	
 
    
	
Senior   Vice President, Human Resources
    	
 
    
	
The   ServiceMaster Company
    	
 
    
	
Direct   Dial: 901-597-XXXX
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
I accept this offer of employment under the terms   and conditions set forth above.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Signature:
    	
/s/   David W. Martin
    	
 
    	
Date:
    	
11/20/12
HOUSEHOLD DATA HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES ANNUAL AVERAGES

21. Persons at work in nonagricultural industries by class of worker and usual full- or part-time status

(Numbers in thousands)

Industry and class of worker

2008

Total

at

work

Worked 1 to 34 hours

Worked

35 hours

or more

Average hours

Total

For

economic

reasons

For noneconomic

reasons

Total

at

work

Persons who

usually work

full time

Usually

work

full

time

Usually

work

part

time

 Total, 16 years and over ......................................................... 137,739 32,836 5,773 8,058 19,005 104,903 38.8 42.5

Wage and salary workers ......................................................... 129,053 29,652 5,007 7,493 17,151 99,401 39.0 42.4

 Mining ..................................................................................... 771 57 5 35 16 714 49.7 50.3

 Construction ........................................................................... 8,885 1,611 656 559 396 7,274 40.1 41.5

 Manufacturing ......................................................................... 15,177 1,689 368 802 519 13,488 42.1 43.0

 Durable goods ...................................................................... 9,818 1,028 220 515 293 8,790 42.3 43.1

 Nondurable goods ................................................................ 5,359 661 148 287 226 4,697 41.8 42.9

 Wholesale and retail trade ...................................................... 18,959 5,218 944 831 3,444 13,741 37.8 42.6

 Transportation and utilities ..................................................... 7,024 1,122 252 402 468 5,902 41.8 43.7

 Information .............................................................................. 3,253 607 83 193 331 2,647 39.8 42.7

 Financial activities .................................................................. 9,205 1,534 159 629 746 7,671 40.3 42.3

 Professional and business services ....................................... 13,172 2,534 482 766 1,286 10,638 40.0 42.7

 Education and health services ................................................ 28,544 7,655 765 1,900 4,989 20,889 37.5 41.6

 Leisure and hospitality ............................................................ 11,694 4,855 933 470 3,452 6,839 34.3 42.0

 Other services ........................................................................ 5,820 1,787 306 280 1,201 4,033 37.1 42.9

 Other services, except private households ........................... 5,042 1,355 212 239 904 3,687 38.3 43.1

 Private households ............................................................... 778 431 94 41 297 346 29.6 40.7

 Public administration .............................................................. 6,549 983 54 627 303 5,565 41.1 42.2

Self-employed workers ............................................................. 8,592 3,136 760 562 1,813 5,457 37.0 43.6

Unpaid family workers .............................................................. 93 48 5 2 41 45 33.4 44.2

 NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

233
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURTOFCRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 

# ^f ^,x ^sJqccv^^ 1/6/2015 fe» \a''A^ &c . ENDERLIN, EUGENE DALE JR. \Tr|Ct. No. 1114973-A WR-82,683-02 

### On this day, the application for<11^07^Writ^of Habeas Corpus has been received and presented to the Court. <^t7^::;&/;:''' ^2^ Abel Acosta, Clerk EUGENEDALE ENDERLIN JR. 

### MM«M&- TDC # 1490997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of ADE Corporation for the six
months ended October 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          69,806
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,130
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     28,191
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               121,475
<PP&E>                                          25,076
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 160,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,499
<BONDS>                                          8,832
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           131
<OTHER-SE>                                     135,878
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   160,898
<SALES>                                         36,267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,267
<CGS>                                           26,256
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,256
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,461)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,096)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,715)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,381)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,712)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.67)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Subjex Corporation does
      hereby certify that:





(a)
      the
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Subjex Corporation for the year ended December
      31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Subjex
      Corporation




Date:
                October 24, 2007
            By:
            /s/  Andrew
                D. HyderAndrew
                D. HyderPresident
                & Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyree A. WALKER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-2160.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 8, 2013.

Decided Feb. 20, 2013.

Timothy M. O’Shea, Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Madison, WI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jonathan E. Hawley, Federal Public Defender, A. Brian Threlkeld, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Peoria, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge, ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge and DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Tyree Walker cased a Wisconsin credit union and then led police on a high-speed chase through rush-hour traffic after his confederate robbed the institution at gunpoint and jumped into Walker’s waiting car. The two men made it ten miles before they were caught. Walker, who was on parole from a state conviction, pleaded guilty to bank robbery. *See*18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). As a condition of his plea agreement he waived his right to appeal his conviction or a sentence of imprisonment of 151 months or less. In exchange the government agreed to a three-level reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 for acceptance of responsibility and recommended a prison term within the guidelines range. The district court sentenced Walker to 151 months. The court ordered that term to run consecutively to the period of imprisonment later imposed when a state judge revoked Walker’s parole.

Walker filed a notice of appeal, but his appointed lawyer has concluded that the appeal is frivolous and seeks to withdraw. *See Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Walker opposes counsel’s motion. *See*CIR. R. 51(b). We limit our review to the potential issues identified in counsel’s facially adequate submission and in Walker’s response. *See United States v. Schuh,*289 F.3d 968, 973-74 (7th Cir.2002).

*574Walker has informed his lawyer that he does not wish to challenge his guilty plea, so counsel’s brief properly omits any discussion about the plea colloquy or the vol-untariness of the plea. *See United States v. Konczak,*683 F.3d 348, 349 (7th Cir.2012); *United States v. Knox,*287 F.3d 667, 671 (7th Cir.2002). It follows, says counsel, that Walker’s appeal waiver makes this case frivolous. We agree. An appeal waiver stands or falls with the guilty plea, *United States v. Sakellarion,*649 F.3d 634, 639 (7th Cir.2011); *United States v. Cole,*569 F.3d 774, 776 (7th Cir.2009), and Walker’s prison sentence satisfies the condition triggering application of the waiver. Moreover, no element of his sentence exceeds a statutory maximum, *see*18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), and the district court did not rely on any unconstitutional factor when imposing Walker’s sentence, *see Dowell v. United States,*694 F.3d 898, 902 (7th Cir.2012). Thus, the appeal waiver must be enforced. And that waiver means, despite Walker’s contrary argument in his Rule 51(b) response, that Walker cannot challenge the length or consecutive nature of his prison term.

The motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CHANCELLOR FRAGOSO

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 2 2

- 00 182

- C R

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20 160D01962 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter ’ s third request for an extension of time within

which to file the Reporter ’ s Record until February 6 , 202 3

. NO FURTHER REQUESTS

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER ’ S RECORD WILL BE

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Evangelina Morales , Court Reporter for the Criminal District

Court No. 1 for El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Repo rter ’ s Record for the above styled and

N umbered cause and forward the same to this Court on or before February 6 , 202 3

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25 th day of January , 20 2 3

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox

, and Soto

, JJ.