alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.15
 PROMISSORY NOTE
 $620,235.00
    
    June ___, 2009
 Borrower Holder Note
 A.
    
    A payment, on the date hereof (the Disbursement Date) in the sum of:
(i) $65,560.00, plus (ii) an amount representing interest from the Disbursement Date
through the last day of the calendar month this Note is executed;
 B.
    
    A payment of interest only at the Applicable Rate on the first day of August,
2009 and on the first day of each calendar month thereafter up to and including the
first day of January, 2010;
 C.
    
    A constant payment of $32,299.69 (based upon an 18 month amortization schedule
assuming a 360 day year consisting of 12 months of 30 days each) on the first day of
February, 2010 and on the first day of each calendar month thereafter up to and
including the first day of June, 2011; and
 D.
    
    The balance of said principal sum, all unpaid interest thereon and all other
amounts owed pursuant to this Note or otherwise in connection with the debt evidenced
by this Note (the Loan) shall be due and payable on the first day of July,
2011 (the Maturity Date).
  Applicable Interest Rate Applicable Interest Rate
 Application




---



##### 



Late Charge th Late Charge
 Security; Defined Terms; Incorporation by Reference (collectively, the Construction Lien) Debt
 Prepayment
 Default Event of Default
 
 2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



Acceleration
 Default Interest Default Rate
 Attorney Fees attorney fees counsel fees
 Limit of Validity Maximum
Rate
 No Oral Amendments
 Assignment
 
 4




---



##### 



Applicable Law; Jurisdiction
 Joint and Several Liability; Authorization
 Waiver of Presentment, Etc
 No Waiver
 Notices
 Holder:
    
    Hatzel & Buehler, Inc.,3600 Silverside Road,Wilmington, DE 19810Attention: Michael C. GoellerBorrower:
    
    Converted Organics of Woodbridge, LLC75 Crows Mill RoadKeasbey, New Jersey 08832Attention:Converted Organics, Inc.7A Commercial Wharf WestBoston, Massachusetts 02110Attention:
  
 5




---



##### 



Severability
 Time of the Essence
 BORROWER AND HOLDER HEREBY KNOWINGLY, VOLUNTARILY AND INTENTIONALLY WAIVE ANY RIGHT THEY, OR
THEIR RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY LITIGATION
BASED ON THE
LOAN EVIDENCED BY THIS NOTE OR ARISING OUT OF, UNDER OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS NOTE, OR ANY COURSE
OF CONDUCT, COURSE OF DEALING, STATEMENT (WHETHER VERBAL OR WRITTEN) OR ACTION OF BORROWER OR
HOLDER.
 [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
 
 6




---



##### 



Witness:
    
    
    
    BorrowerConverted Organics of Woodbridge, LLC,

a New Jersey limited liability companyBy:Name:Title:Converted Organics, Inc.,

a Delaware corporationBy:Name:Title:
 STATE OF NEW JERSEY
    
    ::

    ss.COUNTY OF
    
    :
 
 STATE OF NEW JERSEY
    
    ::

    ss.COUNTY OF
    
    :
 
 
 
 7
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 1 of 26 PageID: 11353
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 2 of 26 PageID: 11354
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 3 of 26 PageID: 11355
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 4 of 26 PageID: 11356
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 5 of 26 PageID: 11357
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 6 of 26 PageID: 11358
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 7 of 26 PageID: 11359
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 8 of 26 PageID: 11360
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 9 of 26 PageID: 11361
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 10 of 26 PageID: 11362
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 11 of 26 PageID: 11363
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 12 of 26 PageID: 11364
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 13 of 26 PageID: 11365
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 14 of 26 PageID: 11366
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 15 of 26 PageID: 11367
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 16 of 26 PageID: 11368
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 17 of 26 PageID: 11369
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 18 of 26 PageID: 11370
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 19 of 26 PageID: 11371
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 20 of 26 PageID: 11372
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 21 of 26 PageID: 11373
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 22 of 26 PageID: 11374
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 23 of 26 PageID: 11375
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 24 of 26 PageID: 11376
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 25 of 26 PageID: 11377
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 170 Filed 08/25/15 Page 26 of 26 PageID: 11378
Case 2:11-mj-03651-MF Document 8 Filed 01/10/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 16
Case 2:11-mj-03651-MF Document 8 Filed 01/10/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 17
Case 2:11-mj-03651-MF Document 8 Filed 01/10/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 18
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 86 Filed 10/26/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 2984
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 86 Filed 10/26/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2985
Case 2:11-cv-04586-KM-MAH   Document 120   Filed 07/10/13   Page 1 of 3 PageID: 2667

Case 2:11-cv-04586-KM-MAH   Document 120   Filed 07/10/13   Page 2 of 3 PageID: 2668

Case 2:11-cv-04586-KM-MAH   Document 120   Filed 07/10/13   Page 3 of 3 PageID: 2669
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries.

SeeBeyond
Technology Corporation Japan K.K.

SeeBeyond
Technology Corporation Korea Ltd.

SeeBeyond
Pty Ltd.

SeeBeyond
Pte Ltd.

SeeBeyond
(Deutschland) GmbH

SeeBeyond
(Schweiz) AG

SeeBeyond
(France) SARL

SeeBeyond
(Italy) S.R.L.

SeeBeyond
(UK) Ltd.

SeeBeyond
B.V.

SeeBeyond
(Belgium) S.A.

SeeBeyond
(Nordic) ApS

SeeBeyond
Espana SL

SeeBeyond
Limited (Hong Kong)

SeeBeyond
(Norway) AS

SeeBeyond
(Sweden) AB

---
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302    OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 I, Troy Nikolai, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual    report on Form 10-KSB of 2000 New Commerce, Inc. for the year ended December    31, 2002;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this    annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or    omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light    of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading    with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the    financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual    report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results    of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods    presented in this annual report.

      4. The registrant's other certifying    offering officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)    for the registrant and we have: 

          a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period    in which this annual report is being prepared; 

          b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures    as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report    (the "Evaluation Date"); and 

          c)    presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of    the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation    Date;

      5. The registrant's other certifying    officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the    registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors    (or persons performing the equivalent function):

           a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls    which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,    summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's    auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

          b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees    who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

      6. The registrant's other certifying    officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were    significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly    affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,    including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and    material weaknesses.

Date: July 24th, 2003/s/ Troy Nikolai                                 Troy Nikolai    President
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 108 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 6764
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 108 Filed 01/23/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 6765
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of The Children's Internet, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Sholeh  Hamedani,  Chief Executive  Officer,  President,  and Chief Financial
Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/S/ SHOLEH HAMEDANI
-----------------------------------
Sholeh Hamedani,
Chief Executive Officer, President,
and Chief Financial Officer
June 8, 2005
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harry Burwell, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 458]

Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nicholas J. Iacovetta, J.), rendered on or about May 12, 2004, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant *366may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur—Tom, J.E, Saxe, Friedman, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
#### Wallace *v.*The State.

Lumpkin, J. — 1. Although the accused was indicted for assault with intent to murder, yet where the solicitor-general announced he would only ask a conviction for the offense of stabbing, which was a misdemeanor, and the trial judge stated he would instruct the jury there could be no conviction for the felony, and afterwards did so, there was no error in refusing to allow counsel for the accused two hours for argument, nor in limiting his argument to thirty minutes under the rule applicable in misdemeanor cases. See New Buies Superior Court, No. 6. The cases of *Hunty. The State,*49 *Ga.*255, and *Williams y. The Stale,*60 *Ga.*367, were decided before the rule in question was adopted.

2. The evidence was sufficient to warrant the jury in finding that the defendant was guilty of culpable negligence in using the knife; the charges of the court complained of were legal and pertinent, and were authorized by the evidence; the assignments of error as to the admission of evidence, not stating what were the grounds of objection, cannot be considered; and there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial.

October 8,1894.

Indictment for assault to murder. Before Judge Griggs. Bibb superior court. April term, 1894.

Wallace was found guilty of stabbing, and his motion for a new trial was overruled. The defense relied solely on the code, §4302. The testimony showed, that about *471half past ten o’clock at night the defendant went to the house of a woman and told her he wanted to see her. ■She said, “I am sick to-night; don’t bother me.” He said, “You ain’t much sick,” and commenced to play with her, catching hold of her, etc. He had a pocketknife open in his hand. She told him to go away, but he continued to do as before. She shoved at him to keep him away, and the knife stuck into her side, making a serious wound, about one and a half inches deep. He was not angry; there were no cross words between them. He had been coming to see her about a year.

*470
      *Judgment affirmed.*

*471The court charged the jury: “If you believe from the evidence in this case, beyond a reasonable doubt, that this defendant stabbed this woman as charged in the bill of indictment, and that he did it intending to stab her and that he was not justified in so doing; or, that he did not intend to stab her but that it happened through negligence on his part, which you believe to be criminal negligence, then your verdict ought to be, guilty of stabbing.” Also, that if the jury believed, beyond a reasonable doubt, that defendant struck the blow that inflicted the wound alleged to have been made by accident or misfortune, in order to acquit him it must satisfactorily appear that there was no evil intention or design or any culpable negligence on his part. These instructions were assigned as erroneous, because there was no evidence that the offense was committed with any intention or with any criminal negligence or culpable neglect on defendant’s part.

John R. Cooper, for plaintiff in error. W. IT. Felton, solicitor-general, by Harrison & Peeples, *contra.*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeremy Stark, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 810]

Defendant’s appeal waiver precludes his challenges to both the severity of his sentence *(see People v Graham,*35 AD3d 1039, 1040 [2006], *lv denied*8 NY3d 922 [2007]) as well as the denial of youthful offender treatment *(see People v Baldwin,*36 AD3d 1024, 1025 [2007]). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Kane and Kavanagh, JJ., conur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
John E. Flaherty 

MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP 

Four Gateway Center 

100 Mulberry Street 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

(973) 622-4444 

Errol B. Taylor 

Fredrick M. Zullow 

MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & MCCLOY LLP 

1 Chase Manhattan Plaza 

New York, New York 10005-1413 

(212) 530-5000 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Orexo AB 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

OREXO AB, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

 

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. 

and MYLAN INC., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

Honorable Freda L. Wolfson, U.S.D.J. 

Honorable Lois H. Goodman, U.S.M.J. 

Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-3788 (FLW)(LHG) 

Motion Day: May 20, 2013 

NOTICE OF MOTION FOR APPLICATION FOR ISSUANCE, PURSUANT TO THE 

HAGUE CONVENTION, OF A LETTER OF REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL 

JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE TO THE APPROPRIATE JUDICIAL AUTHORITY OF INDIA 

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW-LHG Document 122 Filed 04/23/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 2572
2 

TO MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. AND MYLAN INC., AND THEIR 

ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Orexo AB (“Plaintiff”), will move before this 

Court at the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, 402 East State Street, 

Trenton, New Jersey, on May 20, 2013 at 10:00 a.m., before the Honorable Freda L. Wolfson, 

United States District Judge, for entry of an Order granting Orexo’s application, pursuant to the 

Hague Convention, for issuance of a Letter of Request for international judicial assistance to the 

appropriate judicial authority of India. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Plaintiff will rely upon the Memorandum 

submitted with this Notice of Motion, the Declaration of Sunila Sreepada, Exhibits A–G and 

Schedule A, and upon all pleadings and proceedings on file herein. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that a Proposed Order granting Plaintiff’s 

motion is attached as Exhibit B. 

 Respectfully Submitted,

Dated: April 23, 2013 By: s/ John E. Flaherty 

John E. Flaherty 

MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP 

Four Gateway Center 

100 Mulberry Street 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

(973) 622-4444 

Errol B. Taylor 

Fredrick M. Zullow 

MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY &

MCCLOY LLP 

1 Chase Manhattan Plaza 

New York, New York 10005-1413 

(212) 530-5000 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Orexo AB

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW-LHG Document 122 Filed 04/23/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 2573
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 The undersigned hereby certifies that true copies of the foregoing NOTICE OF MOTION 

FOR APPLICATION FOR ISSUANCE, PURSUANT TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION, OF A 

LETTER OF REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE TO THE 

APPROPRIATE JUDICIAL AUTHORITY OF INDIA and supporting documents were caused 

to be served on April 23, 2013 via email and/or the ECF system upon all counsel of record. 

 

 By: s/John E. Flaherty 

 John E. Flaherty 

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW-LHG Document 122 Filed 04/23/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 2574
Exhibit 32.1

              Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                      of Title 18 of the United States Code

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of NTR Acquisition Co. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Mario E. Rodriguez, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ MARIO E. RODRIGUEZ
-----------------------------------
Mario E. Rodriguez
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2007

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to NTR Acquisition Co. and will be
retained by NTR Acquisition Co. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarterly period ended
September 30,
2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 By:
Name:
    
    /s/ Bryan McGuire

Bryan McGuireTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    February 1, 2008
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 530

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 7, 2004

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT

For the relief of Tanya Andrea Goudeau.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 530 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR TANYA AN2 DREA GOUDEAU. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Tanya Andrea Goudeau shall be 

4 classified as a child under section 101(b)(1)(E) of the Im5 migration and Nationality Act for purposes of approval 

6 of a relative visa petition filed under section 204 of such 

7 Act by her adoptive parent and the filing of an application 

8 for an immigrant visa or adjustment of status. 

9 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Tanya Andrea 

10 Goudeau enters the United States before the filing dead11 line specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to 

12 have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise 

13 eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 

14 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 

15 of the enactment of this Act. 

16 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

17 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the pe18 tition and the application for issuance of an immigrant 

19 visa or the application for adjustment of status are filed 

20 with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the 

21 enactment of this Act. 

22 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

23 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res24 idence to Tanya Andrea Goudeau, the Secretary of State 

25 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, for the 

26 current or next following fiscal year, the worldwide level 
3

HR 530 RFS 

1 of family-sponsored immigrants under section 

2 201(c)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

3 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

4 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

5 parents, brothers, and sisters of Tanya Andrea Goudeau 

6 shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 

7 right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Na8 tionality Act. 

9 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR CITIZENSHIP. 

10 For purposes of section 320 of the Immigration and 

11 Nationality Act, Tanya Andrea Goudeau shall be consid12 ered to have satisfied the requirements applicable to 

13 adopted children under section 101(b)(1) of such Act.

Passed the House of Representatives July 6, 2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.