alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 516 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 516

To amend the General Education Provisions Act to clarify the definition 
     of a student regarding family educational and privacy rights.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2003

  Mr. Kennedy of Minnesota (for himself, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Boehner, Mr. 
   Ramstad, Mr. Gutknecht, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. Green of Wisconsin, Mr. 
   Hoekstra, Mr. Burr, Mr. Souder, Mr. Tancredo, Mr. Pickering, Mr. 
Hostettler, and Mr. Aderholt) introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the General Education Provisions Act to clarify the definition 
     of a student regarding family educational and privacy rights.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO GENERAL EDUCATION PROVISIONS ACT.

    Paragraph (6) of subsection (a) of section 444 of the General 
Education Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. 1232g; also known as the Family 
Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974) is amended by inserting 
``(other than a person educated at a home school, whether or not a home 
school is treated as a home school or a private school under State 
law)'' after ``does not include a person''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.29*Term Sheet Based On Promotion

 

 

December 12, 2001

Mr. Darrel Slack2745 Summit DriveBurlingame, CA  94010

Dear Darrel:

	I am pleased to offer you the promotion to Chief Financial Officer,effective January 1, 2002.  You will continue to report to me.  The terms ofthis promotion are outlined below.
Base Salary:	$180,000
Stock Options:	    55,000 shares
If Centillium Communications, Inc. is acquired, merged, or a significantchange of control occurs which impacts your job responsibilities, in one of thefollowing ways, you and the Company agree that your stock options would beaccelerated by one full year.
- Job elimination or if you are asked to leave the organization;
- Job responsibilities were significantly reduced, changed or altered;
- Forced to move to an unacceptable location.

Your acceptance of these terms regarding your promotion represents the soleagreement between you and Centillium Communications, no prior promises,representations or understandings relative to any terms or conditions of youremployment are to be considered as part of this agreement unless expressed inwriting in this letter or your original offer letter signed May 9, 2000.   

Please indicate your acceptance by signing below.

Sincerely,

 

Faraj Aalaei

Chief Executive Officer

				The forgoing terms and conditions are hereby accepted:

				Signed:__________________________

				Date:_________________________*
ex10-1i.htm


 


EXHIBIT 10.1i


NINTH AMENDMENT TO REAL ESTATE LEASE


THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 1st day of November, 2012, by and between TIPPMANN PROPERTIES, INC., as agent for LAURENCE TIPPMANN, SR. FAMILY PARTNERSHIP(hereinafter referred to as “Lessor”), and TOWER FINANCIAL CORPORATION(hereinafter referred to as “Lessee”), and WITNESSETH:


WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into a Real Estate Lease dated January 1, 1999, amended on March 8, 1999, August 12, 1999, June 29, 2001, March 24, 2004, May 5, 2006, September 18, 2006, January 10, 2006, and January 10, 2010 currently covering approximately 49,257 usable square feet of premises commonly known as 116 East Berry Street, Suite 100, Fort Wayne, Indiana;


AND WHEREAS, Lessee and Lessor are desirous as of November 1, 2012 of increasing the space by approximately 108 rentable square feet of office space commonly known as a part of Suite 555 as outlined on attached floor plan;


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:








	
  

	
1.

	
Beginning November 1, 2012, the leased premises shall be increased to reflect approximately 108 rentable square feet of office space (part of Suite 555 as outlined on attached floor plan) for a total of approximately 49,365 usable square feet.


















	
  

	
2.

	
The following chart summarizes the preceding changes effective November 1, 2012:







 




	Floor 	 	Total Sq. Ft.	 	 	Rate	 	 	Monthly Rent	 	Expiration
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	1st Floor 	 	 	22,227	 	 	$14.75	 	 	$*27,320.69	 	
12/31/18


	2nd Floor 	 	 	6,924	 	 	$14.75	 	 	$* 8,510.75	 	
12/31/18


	2nd Floor 	 	 	12,640	 	 	$13.50	 	 	$*14,220.00	 	

12/31/18




	5th Floor 	 	 	7,466	 	 	$13.50	 	 	$8,399.25	 	
12/31/13**


	5th Floor 	 	 	108	 	 	$13.50	 	 	$121.50	 	
12/31/13


	 	 	 	49,365	 	 	 	 	 	 	$58,572.19	 	 





 









*Monthly rent will change 1/1/14 with start of Annual CPI.


**Includes three (3) year option to renew.


 


105









  





  











  






 



	
  

	
3.

	
Except as hereby amended, all other terms and conditions contained in the original Real Estate Lease are hereby reaffirmed and left unchanged by the terms of this Ninth Amendment.






















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Ninth Amendment on the day and year first above written.


 


 


 


 


 




	
TIPPMANN PROPERTIES INC., as

	 	 	 	 
	
agent for Laurence Tippmann, Sr.

	 	TOWER FINANCIAL CORPORATION	 
	Family Partnership                                        	 	  (“Lessee”)	 
	(“Lessor”) 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	BY:                                                                                        	 	 	BY:                                                                                                                      	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	PRINTED:                                         	 	 	PRINTED:                                                                                                           	 







 


 


106
Exhibit
      32.1





Certification
      of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002





The
      undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-KSB filed
      by
      Weststar Financial Services Corporation (the “Issuer”) for the year ended
      December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained
      in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the
      periods presented therein.








Date:   March
                17, 2008
            /s/
                G. Gordon GreenwoodG.
                Gordon GreenwoodPresident  &
                Chief Executive Officer
#### CREEDON v. WILSON et al.

Civ. A. No. 7830.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

March 12, 1948.

*489Joseph J. Strassman, Litigation Attorney, Office of the Housing Expediter, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

A. Allan Goodman, Charles Polis, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.

GANEY, District Judge.

This action 1 is almost identical to Creedon v. Polis, D.C.E.D.Pa., 7 F.R.D. 652. For the reasons stated by Judge Bard in his opinion, the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint is denied and an order may be entered directing that the persons to whom the Housing Expediter has requested that restitution be tendered be added as a party plaintiff in this action so that any counterclaim of the defendants relating to the cause of action may be asserted against, but not to exceed, the claim of the plaintiff.

1

. This court has jurisdiction by virtue of Secs. 205 and 206 of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, §§ 1895, 1896.
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the report on Form 10-Q of Viad Corp for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Viad Corp.
 Date: August 6, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Ellen M. IngersollEllen M. IngersollChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PRIMEDIA Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kim R. Payne, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/S/ KIM R. PAYNE                                 
|Kim R. Payne,                                    
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

August 9, 2010

This certification
accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-11194

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARVIN JAMEL FANTROY, also known as Seven,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:12-CR-427-10

Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Marvin Jamel Fantroy has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Fantroy has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 16, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-11194 Document: 00512871074 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/16/2014
No. 13-11194

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-11194 Document: 00512871074 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/16/2014
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5346 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5346

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to transfer to the Bureau 
  of Immigration and Customs Enforcement all functions of the Customs 
  Patrol Officers unit of the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection 
 operating on the Tohono O'odham Indian reservation (commonly known as 
          the ``Shadow Wolves'' unit), and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2004

Mr. Souder (for himself, Mr. Shadegg, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Nethercutt, Mr. 
 Tom Davis of Virginia, and Mr. McHugh) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to transfer to the Bureau 
  of Immigration and Customs Enforcement all functions of the Customs 
  Patrol Officers unit of the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection 
 operating on the Tohono O'odham Indian reservation (commonly known as 
          the ``Shadow Wolves'' unit), and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Shadow Wolves Border Defense Act''.

SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF EXISTING CUSTOMS PATROL OFFICERS UNIT AND 
              ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW CPO UNITS IN THE BUREAU OF 
              IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT.

    (a) Transfer of Existing Unit.--Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security 
shall transfer to the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement all 
functions (including the personnel, assets, and obligations held by or 
available in connection with such functions) of the Customs Patrol 
Officers unit of the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection operating 
on the Tohono O'odham Indian reservation (commonly known as the 
``Shadow Wolves'' unit).
    (b) Establishment of New Units.--The Secretary is authorized to 
establish within the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement 
additional units of Customs Patrol Officers in accordance with this 
section.
    (c) Duties.--The Customs Patrol Officer unit transferred pursuant 
to subsection (a) and the additional units established pursuant to 
subsection (b) shall enforce the customs laws of the United States on 
Indian lands by preventing the smuggling of narcotics, weapons of mass 
destruction, and other contraband.
    (d) Basic Pay for Journeyman Officers.--The rate of basic pay for a 
journeyman Customs Patrol Officer in a unit described in this section 
shall be not less than the rate of basic pay for GS-13 of the General 
Schedule.
                                 <all>
```
S06F0857.

#### JONES v. SMITH.

(632 SE2d 663)

Decided July 13, 2006

Reconsideration denied July 28, 2006.

Franklin G. Jones, *pro se.*

Nancy M. Smith, *pro se.*

melton, Justice.

Franklin Jones and Nancy Smith, who have one minor child, were divorced in 2005. In the final judgment and decree of divorce entered on September 13, 2005, the trial court awarded the parties joint legal custody of the minor child, with sole physical custody to appellee-wife. Based upon the evidence presented, the trial court determined that appellant was in wilful contempt for being in arrears in temporary child support, for having failed to comply with the terms of a motion to compel discovery, and for having refused to pay attorney fees to appellee’s attorney pursuant to a court order. Appellant filed a pro se application for discretionary review which we granted pursuant to this Court’s pilot project. See *Wright v. Wright,*277 Ga. 133 (587 SE2d 600) (2003).

1. Appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding physical custody of the minor child to appellee and restricting him to a specific visitation schedule, arguing that the evidence showed that the best interests of the child were better served by awarding joint physical custody. See OCGA § 19-9-3 (a) (2). As a general rule, where the trial court exercises its discretion and awards custody of a child to one fit parent over the other fit parent, an appellate court will not interfere with that decision unless there is evidence the trial court clearly abused its discretion. *Welch v. Welch,*277 Ga. 808, 809 (596 SE2d 134) (2004). Here, in the absence of a transcript or a stipulation of evidence promulgated in accordance with OCGA§ 5-6-41 (g), we must presume that the evidence supports the findings made by the trial court. See *Blue v. Blue,*279 Ga. 550 (1) (615 SE2d 540) (2005).

2. Appellant asserts that the trial court further abused its discretion when, ignoring appellee’s demonstrated adultery, the court awarded attorney fees and found him in contempt. Absent a trial transcript, we must presume that the evidence considered by the trial court supported the finding made by the court. *Blue,*supra; *Pollard v. Pollard,*279 Ga. 57 (1) (609 SE2d 354) (2005).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Exhibit
32.2





EXTERRAN
PARTNERS, L.P.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Exterran Partners, L.P.
(the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Daniel K.
Schlanger, as Chief Financial Officer of Exterran GP LLC, the general partner of
the Partnership’s general partner, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
his knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





/s/ Daniel K.
Schlanger


Daniel K.
Schlanger


Chief
Financial Officer, Exterran GP LLC


As
General Partner of Exterran General Partner, L.P.


As
General Partner of Exterran Partners, L.P.




August 6,
2008





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the
Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.




33
0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Chart 1-11. The job openings rate generally has moved in the 

opposite direction of the unemployment rate

Unemployment rate

Job openings rate

NOTE: Shaded area represents recession. Data are seasonally adjusted.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Percent

Chart 1-11. The job openings rate generally has moved in the 

opposite direction of the unemployment rate

• The job openings rate (the number of job openings as a percent of employment 

plus job openings) decreased during the 2001 recession. As the job openings 

rate edged up from mid-2003 forward, the unemployment rate declined.

• Both the unemployment rate and the job openings rate are approaching their 

pre-recession levels.
Exhibit 31

                        RULE 13a-14(a) Certification

I, Eduardo Rodriguez, certify that:

   1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Headliners
Entertainment Group, Inc.;

   2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
   to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
   such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

   3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

   4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

       a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

       b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of ths disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

       c)  Disclosed in this report any changes in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

   5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

       a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

       b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 14, 2005                  /s/ Eduardo Rodriguez
                                      -------------------------------------
                                      Eduardo Rodriguez, Chief Executive
                                       Officer and Chief Financial Officer