ME1 12633143v.1

John E. Flaherty 

Jonathan M.H. Short 

McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP 

Four Gateway Center 

100 Mulberry Street 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

(973) 622-4444 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs/CounterclaimDefendants AstraZeneca AB, 

Aktiebolaget Hässle, AstraZeneca LP, 

KBI Inc. and KBI-E Inc. 

Of Counsel: 

Errol B. Taylor 

Fredrick M. Zullow 

MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY 

 & McCLOY LLP 

1 Chase Manhattan Plaza 

New York, New York 10005-1413 

(212) 530-5000 

Henry J. Renk 

Bruce C. Haas 

Colleen Tracy 

Joshua I. Rothman 

FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER 

 & SCINTO 

1290 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10104-3800 

(212) 218-2100 

Einar Stole 

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 

1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004-2401 

(202) 662-6000 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

ASTRAZENECA’S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO HANMI’S 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT NO. 5: NON-INFRINGEMENT 

OF UNASSERTED CLAIMS OF U.S. PATENT NO. 5,714,504 

ASTRAZENECA AB, AKTIEBOLAGET 

HÄSSLE, ASTRAZENECA LP, KBI INC. 

and KBI-E INC., 

Plaintiffs and 

Counterclaim-Defendants,

 v. 

HANMI USA, INC., HANMI 

PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., HANMI 

FINE CHEMICAL CO., LTD. and HANMI 

HOLDINGS CO., LTD., 

 

Defendants and 

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs. 

Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00760-JAP-TJB 

Judge Joel A. Pisano 

Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni 

Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB Document 154 Filed 12/03/11 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 5499
- 1 - 

ME1 12633143v.1

AstraZeneca1

 submits this brief in opposition to Hanmi’s2 “Motion for Summary 

Judgment No. 5: Non-Infringement of Unasserted Claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,714,504.” D.I. 

104, 117 (“Motion 5”). 

In Motion 5, Hanmi contends that it is entitled to summary judgment of noninfringement of claims 8 and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 5,715,504 (“the ’504 patent”) because Hanmi 

does not infringe these claims and AstraZeneca does not contend otherwise. D.I. 117 at 2. 

AstraZeneca does not oppose Motion 5 with respect to claims 8 and 9. 

Hanmi’s arguments in Motion 5 with respect to claims 3, 5 and 10 of the ’504 

patent were “contingent on the Court’s denial of AstraZeneca’s motion to belatedly assert these 

claims.” D.I. 117 at 2. The Court granted AstraZeneca’s motion to amend its Disclosure of 

Asserted Claims to add claims 3, 5 and 10 on November 14, 2011. D.I. 138, 139. Thus, 

Hanmi’s Motion 5 with respect to claims 3, 5 and 10 is moot. 

For the foregoing reasons, AstraZeneca respectfully requests that the Court deny 

Hanmi’s summary judgment Motion 5 with respect to claims 3, 5 and 10 of the ’504 patent. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: December 2, 2011 By: s/ John E. Flaherty 

John E. Flaherty 

Jonathan M.H. Short 

McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP 

Four Gateway Center 

100 Mulberry Street 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

(973) 622-4444 

 

1

 “AstraZeneca” refers collectively to plaintiffs AstraZeneca AB, Aktiebolaget Hässle, 

AstraZeneca LP, KBI Inc. and KBI-E Inc. 

2

 “Hanmi” refers collectively to defendants Hanmi, Inc., Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 

Hanmi Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. and Hanmi Holdings Co., Ltd. 

Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB Document 154 Filed 12/03/11 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 5500
- 2 - 

ME1 12633143v.1

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ASTRAZENECA AB, 

AKTIEBOLAGET HÄSSLE, 

ASTRAZENECA LP, KBI INC. 

and KBI-E INC. 

Of Counsel: 

Henry J. Renk 

Bruce C. Haas 

Colleen Tracy 

Joshua I. Rothman 

FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER 

& SCINTO 

1290 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10104-3800 

(212) 218-2100 

Errol B. Taylor 

Fredrick M. Zullow 

MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY 

 & McCLOY LLP 

1 Chase Manhattan Plaza 

New York, New York 10005-1413 

(212) 530-5000 

Einar Stole 

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 

1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004-2401 

(202) 662-6000 

Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB Document 154 Filed 12/03/11 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 5501
- 3 - 

ME1 12633143v.1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on December 2, 2011, I caused a copy of the foregoing 

ASTRAZENECA’S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO HANMI’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT NO. 5: NON-INFRINGEMENT OF UNASSERTED CLAIMS OF U.S. PATENT 

NO. 5,714,504 and supporting documents to be served upon the following counsel by operation 

of the Court’s electronic filing system and/or electronic mail: 

Allyn Z. Lite (alite@litedepalma.com) 

Michael E. Patunas (mpatunas@litedepalma.com) 

Mayra V. Tarantino (mtarantino@litedepalma.com) 

LITE DEPALMA GREENBERG 

Two Gateway Center, 12th Floor 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

T: (973) 623-3000 

Mark Boland (mboland@sughrue.com) 

Michael R. Dzwonczyk (mdzwonczyk@sughrue.com) 

Renita Rathinam (rrathinam@sughrue.com) 

SUGHRUE MION, PLLC 

2100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 800 

Washington, D.C. 20037-3213 

T: (202) 293-7060 

John B. Scherling (jscherling@sughrue.com) 

SUGHRUE MION, PLLC 

4250 Executive Square, Suite 900 

La Jolla, California 92037 

T: (858) 795-1180 

 By: s/ John E. Flaherty 

 John E. Flaherty 

 

Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB Document 154 Filed 12/03/11 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 5502