alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Chart 4-4. Blacks are less likely to participate in the labor 

force than whites, Asians, or Hispanics

NOTE: Persons whose ethnicity is identified as Hispanic or Latino may be of any race. Data for Asians only available since 2000.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

58

60

62

64

66

68

70

1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006

58

60

62

64

66

68

70

Percent

White

Hispanic or Latino

Black or African American

Asian

Chart 4-4. Blacks are less likely to participate in the labor 

force than whites, Asians, or Hispanics 

• In 2006, the labor force participation rate—the percent of persons 16 years and 

over who are working or looking for work—was 64.1 percent for blacks; this 

compared with 68.7 percent for Hispanics. 

• The rates for whites and Asians were about equal—66.5 percent and 66.2 

percent, respectively.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Miguel B. FernandezMiguel B. FernandezNovember 14, 2007
    Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 24(b)(9)(c)

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 3
                                       TO
                        SHAREHOLDER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT

The  Shareholder  Maintenance  Agreement  between  The AAL Mutual  Funds and AAL
Capital Management  Corporation,  as amended, effective April 1, 1995, is hereby
amended, January 8, 1997, as follows:

         1.       Schedule A, attached to the Shareholder Maintenance Agreement,
                  is amended to add The AAL High  Yield Bond Fund.  Schedule  A,
                  effective as of January 8, 1997, is attached hereto.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be signed by
the respective officers effective as of January 8, 1997.


ATTEST:                                  THE AAL MUTUAL FUNDS



By_________________________              By______________________________
    Robert G. Same, Secretary                H. Michael Spence, President



ATTEST:                                  AAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
                                         CORPORATION



By________________________               By______________________________
    Robert G. Same, Secretary            H. Michael Spence, President

                                                       

<PAGE>



                        SHAREHOLDER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
                                   SCHEDULE A
                           (effective January 8, 1997)

                           The AAL Capital Growth Fund
                                The AAL Bond Fund
                           The AAL Municipal Bond Fund
                            The AAL Money Market Fund
          The AAL U.S. Government Zero Coupon Target Fund, Series 2001
          The AAL U.S. Government Zero Coupon Target Fund, Series 2006
      The AAL Mid Cap Stock Fund (f/k/a The AAL Smaller Company Stock Fund)
                             The AAL Utilities Fund
                           The AAL International Fund
                          The AAL Small Cap Stock Fund
                          The AAL High Yield Bond Fund
H. Res. 920 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 14, 2020. 

Resolved, That House Resolution 891, agreed to March 

11, 2020 (as most recently amended by House Resolution 

911, agreed to March 27, 2020), is amended— 

(1) in section 7, by striking ‘‘April 19, 2020’’ and 

inserting ‘‘May 3, 2020’’; 

(2) in section 10, by striking ‘‘April 19, 2020’’ and 

inserting ‘‘May 3, 2020’’; and 

(3) in section 11, by striking ‘‘April 20, 2020’’ and 

inserting ‘‘May 4, 2020’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**Exhibit 32**

**** 

**** 

**** 

**** 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT**

**** 

**** 

**** 

**           **Dann H. Bowman and Sandra F. Pender hereby certify as follows:

 

                1.  They are the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Chino Commercial Bancorp.

 

                2.    The Form 10-Q of Chino Commercial Bancorp for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78(m) or 78(d)) and the information contained in the report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Chino Commercial Bancorp.

 

Date: November 15, 2010

                                                                        

                        By: /s/ Dann H. Bowman

                                                                       Dann H. Bowman

       President and Chief Executive Officer       

 

 

By: /s/ Sandra F. Pender

       Sandra F. Pender

                                                                                                       Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

                                                                               (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)            

 

 

----
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF   Document 112    Filed 04/18/12   Page 1 of 6 PageID: 6213

Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF   Document 112    Filed 04/18/12   Page 2 of 6 PageID: 6214

Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF   Document 112    Filed 04/18/12   Page 3 of 6 PageID: 6215

Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF   Document 112    Filed 04/18/12   Page 4 of 6 PageID: 6216

Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF   Document 112    Filed 04/18/12   Page 5 of 6 PageID: 6217

Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF   Document 112    Filed 04/18/12   Page 6 of 6 PageID: 6218
Case 3:11-cr-00499-JAP   Document 9   Filed 03/09/11   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 13

Case 3:11-cr-00499-JAP   Document 9   Filed 03/09/11   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 14
EX-10.17



 Exhibit 10.17 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 
 USPI GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. 

2007 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 This Second Amendment (this “Amendment”) is entered into to be effective as of February 21, 2013 (the “Effective Date”). All capitalized terms used but not defined
herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the USPI Group Holdings, Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended, the “Plan”). 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, USPI Group Holdings, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), has adopted the Plan to advance the interests of the Company by providing for the grant to Participants of Awards. 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9 of the Plan, the Administrator may amend the Plan; 
 WHEREAS, Section 4(a) of the Plan initially provided that a maximum of 20,145,458 shares of Stock may delivered in satisfaction of Awards under the Plan; 

WHEREAS, the First Amendment to the Plan increased the maximum shares of Stock that may be delivered in satisfaction of Awards
under the Plan to 20,726,523; and 
 WHEREAS, the Administrator again desires to amend Section 4(a) of the Plan as
set forth in this Amendment. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of the Effective Date, as
follows: 
 1. The first sentence of Section 4(a) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: “A
maximum of 26,630,457 shares of Stock may be delivered in satisfaction of Awards under the Plan.” 
 2. Except as modified
by this Amendment, the Plan shall continue to read in its current state. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being
the duly elected Secretary of the Company, hereby certifies that this Amendment was adopted by the Administrator on the Effective Date. 
  

			
	USPI GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John J. Wellik

		
	Name:	 	John J. Wellik
	Title:	 	Secretary
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Carla F. Tucker,certify that:

1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Skagit State Bancorp, Inc.;

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)           Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)           Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date:  |  November  13, 2006 |                     | /s/ Carla F. Tucker |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|   |                     | Carla F. Tucker          |
|   |                     | Senior  Vice-President   |
|   |                     | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Carmen Resendiz PICHARDO, also known as Jose Carmen Resendiz-Pichardo, also known as Orlando Alaniz-Mungia, also known as Orlando Alaniz, also known as J. Carmen Resendiz, also known as Sergio Reyes, Jr., also known as Orlando Roberto Alaniz-Muniga, also known as Jose C. Resendiz-Pichards, also known as Orlando R. Alaniz, also known as Orlando Alanizmunguia, also known as Orlando Alaniz-Muniga, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-20877

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 2012.

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Lourdes Rodriguez, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Carmen Resendiz Pichardo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Resendiz Pichardo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s mo*344tion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Faraj Aalei, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report of Centillium Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Faraj Aalaei
Faraj Aalaei
Chief Executive Officer

February 14, 2003



---
Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW -LHG Document 53 Filed 04/16/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 221
Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW -LHG Document 53 Filed 04/16/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 222
Case 2:11-cr-00404-SDW Document 25 Filed 10/14/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 59
Case 2:11-cr-00404-SDW Document 25 Filed 10/14/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 60
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Malone BURNS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-40516

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 2012.

Terri Lynn Hagan, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Ernest Gonzalez, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Plano, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert Gerard Arrambide, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Office of the Federal Defender-Eastern District, Frisco, TX, Amy R. Blalock, Federal Defender’s Office, Tyler, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES*

PER CURIAM: *

On April 17, 2012, we affirmed Burns’s sentence because we were bound by our precedent which held that the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010(FSA) does not apply retroactively to a defendant who is sentenced after the effective date of the FSA *346but whose offense preceded the FSA’s effective date. *United States v. Burns,*467 Fed.Appx. 265 (5th Cir.2012) (citing *United States v. Tickles,*661 F.3d 212, 214-15 (5th Cir.2011)).

After our opinion was issued, the Supreme Court held in *Dorsey v. United States,*— U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 2321, 183 L.Ed.2d 250 (2012), that the more lenient penalties of the FSA apply to offenders who committed offenses before the effective date of the FSA, but who were sentenced after that date. The Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded for further consideration in the light of *Dorsey. Burns v. United States,*— U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 331, 184 L.Ed.2d 4, 2012 WL 3018574 (U.S. Oct. 1, 2012). We therefore VACATE Burns’s sentence and REMAND this case for resentencing consistent with *Dorsey.*

VACATED and REMANDED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 21.1****SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**   **Name of Subsidiary (Jurisdiction)** **Ownership**IVANHOE ENERGY INTERNATIONAL INC. (B.V.I.) 100%   IVANHOE ENERGY HOLDINGS INC. (NEVADA) 100%Ivanhoe Energy (USA) Inc. (Nevada) 100% (indirect)Ivanhoe Energy Petroleum Projects Inc. (Nevada) 100% (indirect)Ivanhoe Energy HTL Inc (Nevada) 100% (indirect)Ivanhoe HTL Petroleum Ltd (Nevada) 100% (indirect)Ivanhoe Energy HTL (USA) Inc. (Nevada & California) 100% (indirect)   IVANHOE ENERGY INTERNATIONAL VENTURES INC. (BVI) 100%Ivanhoe Energy (Middle East) Inc. (BVI) 100% (indirect)Energy Resources Development Japan Corporation (Japan) 100% (indirect)Ivanhoe Energy (Latin America) Inc. (BVI) 100% (indirect)   SUNWING HOLDING CORPORATION (Barbados) 100%Sunwing Energy Ltd. (Bermuda) 100% (indirectSunwing Zitong Energy Ltd. (BVI) 100% (indirect)Sunwing Management Limited (Hong Kong) 100% (indirect)Pan-China Resources Ltd. (BVI) 100% (indirect)Dagang Resources Ltd. (BVI) 100% (indirect)China Ivanhoe Energy Ltd. (BVI) 100% (indirect)   IVANHOE ENERGY ADVISORY INC. (BVI) 100%   IVANHOE ENERGY ECUADOR INC. (BC) 100%
##### 



Blackboard Inc. Subsidiaries
 Blackboard Tennessee, LLC
    
    DelawareBb Acquisition Corp.
    
    DelawareBlackboard International Holdings Inc.
    
    DelawareBb Management Co. LLC
    
    DelawareBlackboard iCollege, Inc.
    
    DelawareBlackboard CampusWide of Texas, Inc.
    
    TexasBlackboard International LP
    
    BermudaBlackboard International B.V.
    
    NetherlandsBlackboard Japan KK
    
    JapanBlackboard (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaBlackboard USA Inc.
    
    DelawareBlackboard (UK) Limited
    
    United KingdomBlackboard Educational (Canada) Corporation
    
    CanadaBlackboard (Australia) Pty Ltd.
    
    AustraliaGreenery Days Company Limited
    
    Cayman Islands
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 137 (Monday, July 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 35203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17109]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5300-N-13]


Notice of Availability: Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for 
Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Through this notice, HUD announces the availability on its Web 
site of the application information, submission deadlines, funding 
criteria, and other requirements for the FY2009 Self-Help Homeownership 
Opportunity Program (SHOP) NOFA. The FY2009 SHOP NOFA makes $26.5 
million in assistance to national and regional nonprofit organizations 
and consortia which facilitate and encourage innovative homeownership 
opportunities for low-income individuals and families. The notice 
providing information regarding the application process, funding 
criteria and eligibility requirements is available on Grants.gov Web 
site http://apply07.grants.gov/apply/forms_apps_idx.html. A link to 
Grants.gov is also available on the HUD Web site at http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm. The Catalogue of Federal Domestic 
Assistance (CFDA) number for the Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity 
Program is 14.247. Applications must be submitted electronically 
through Grants.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information concerning 
the Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP), contact Lou 
Thompson, Office of Affordable Housing Programs, Office of Community 
Planning and Development, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 
451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7168, Washington, DC 20410-7000; 
telephone 202-402-4594 (this is not a toll-free number). Persons with 
speech or hearing impairments may access this telephone number via TTY 
by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service during 
working hours at 800-877-8339.

    Dated: June 12, 2009.
Nelson R. Breg[ograve]n,
General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development.
[FR Doc. E9-17109 Filed 7-14-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of ThermoEnergy Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report"), I, Teodor
Klowan, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May12,
2010




By:
                      /s/ Teodor Klowan,
      Jr.Name:
      Teodor Klowan, Jr., CPATitle:
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Josephine Morris, Appellant, v Queens Long Island Medical Group, P.C., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[854 NYS2d 222]

*828The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the motion of the defendants Queens Long Island Medical Group, P.C., and Neelima Phatak (hereinafter the respondents) which was to strike stated portions of the plaintiffs expert witness disclosure pursuant to CPLR 3101 (d), since the proposed testimony exceeded the bounds of the allegations in the plaintiffs bill of particulars *(see Gray v City of New York,*33 AD3d 857, 859 [2006]; *Arguinzoni v Parkway Hosp.,*14 AD3d 633, 634 [2005]; *Palchik v Eisenberg, 278*AD2d 293, 294 [2000]).

The Supreme Court also providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for leave to amend her bill of particulars to assert new theories of liability. Generally, “[i]n the absence of prejudice or surprise to the opposing party, leave to amend a pleading should be freely granted unless the proposed amendment is palpably insufficient or patently devoid of merit” *(G.K. Alan Assoc., Inc. v Lazzari,*44 AD3d 95, 99 [2007]; *see*CPLR 3025 [b]; *Lucido v Mancuso,*49 AD3d 220 [2008]; *Trataros Constr., Inc. v New York City School Constr. Auth.,*46 AD3d 874 [2007]). However, where the application for leave to amend is made long after the action has been certified for trial, “judicial discretion in allowing such amendments should be discrete, circumspect, prudent, and cautious” *(Clarkin v Staten Is. Univ. Hosp.,*242 AD2d 552, 552 [1997]; *Countrywide Funding Corp. v Reynolds,*41 AD3d 524, 525 [2007]). Moreover, when, as here, leave is sought on the eve of trial, judicial discretion should be exercised sparingly *(see Comsewogue Union Free School Dist. v Allied-Trent Roofing Sys., Inc.,*15 AD3d 523, 525 [2005]; *Rosse-Glickman v Beth Israel Med. Ctr.-Kings Hwy. Div.,*309 AD2d 846 [2003]). Further, the court’s exercise of discretion under such circumstances will not be lightly disturbed *(see Trataros Constr., Inc. v New York City School Constr. Auth.,*46 AD3d at 874). Here, granting the plaintiffs application would have substantially prejudiced the respondents as the amendment, which was based upon facts that the plaintiff had known since the inception of *829this action, sought to add new theories of liability that were not readily discernible from the allegations in the complaint and the original bill of particulars *(see Cohen v Ho,*38 AD3d 705, 706 [2007]). In light of such prejudice, we need not address the issue of whether the proposed amendment was palpably insufficient or patently devoid of merit *(see G.K. Alan Assoc., Inc. v Lazzari,*44 AD3d at 99; *Lucido v Mancuso,*49 AD3d 220 [2008]; *Trataros Constr., Inc. v New York City School Constr. Auth.,*46 AD3d 874 [2007]). Spolzino, J.P., Skelos, Lifson and McCarthy, JJ., concur.