35844 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 21, 2009 / Notices 

1Because the last day of the anniversary month 

of this order, November 30, 2008, fell on a Sunday, 

petitioners filed their request for review on the next 

business day, Monday, December 1, 2008. 

Group Inc., Wayne, PA; and United 

Defense, L.P., Arlington, VA. 

2. Add the following companies as 

new Members of the Certificate within 

the meaning of section 325.2(l) of the 

Regulations (15 CFR 325.(l)): AAR 

Corp., Wood Dale, IL; Accenture, 

Hartford, CT (controlling entity: 

Accenture, Ltd., Hamilton Bermuda); 

Airlaunch LLC, Kirkland, WA; Allfast 

Fastening Systems, City of Industry, CA; 

AMSAFE Aviation, Phoenix, AZ; AMT 

II Corporation, New York, NY; Aurora 

Flight Sciences Corporation, Manassas, 

VA; AUSCO, Inc., Port Washington, NY; 

B/E Aerospace, Inc., Wellington, FL; 

Belcan Corporation, Cincinnati, OH; 

Best Foam Fabricators, Inc., Chicago, IL; 

BreconRidge Corporation, Ottawa, 

Ontario; CAE USA Inc., Tampa, FL 

(controlling entity: CAE Inc., Montreal, 

Canada); Chromalloy Power Services 

Corporation, San Antonio, TX 

(controlling entity: Carlyle Group, 

Washington, DC); Click Bond, Inc., 

Carson City, NV (controlling entity: 

Physical Systems, Inc., Carson City, 

NV); Click Commerce, Inc., Chicago, IL; 

Cobham, Arlington, VA (controlling 

entity: Cobham, plc, Winborne, Dorset, 

United Kingdom); DynCorp 

International LLC, Falls Church, VA; 

Eaton Aerospace Operations, Irvine, CA 

(controlling entity: Eaton Corporation, 

Cleveland, OH); Eclipse Aviation 

Corporation, Albuquerque, NM; 

Electronic Data Systems Corporation, 

Plano, TX (controlling entity: Hewlett 

Packard, Palo Alto, CA); Erickson AirCrane Inc., Portland, OR; ESI North 

America, Bloomfield Hills, MI 

(controlling entity: ESI Group, Paris, 

France); Flextronics International USA, 

Inc., San Jose, CA (controlling entity: 

Flextronics International, Ltd., 

Singapore); Flight Safety International, 

Inc., Flushing, NY (controlling entity: 

Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Omaha, NE); 

FTG Circuits, Inc., Chatsworth, CA 

(controlling entity: FTG Group 

Corporation, Toronto, Canada); Groen 

Brothers Aviation, Inc., Salt Lake City, 

UT; IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY; LAI 

International, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ 

(controlling entity: Spell Capital 

Partners, LLC, Minneapolis, MN); LMI 

Aerospace, Inc., St. Charles, MO; Lord 

Corporation, Cary, NC; Marotta 

Controls, Inc., Montville, NJ; McKechnie 

Aerospace, Irvine, CA; Micro-Coax, Inc., 

Pottstown, PA; Micro-Tronics, Inc., 

Tempe, AZ; MicroSat Systems, Inc., 

Littleton, CO (controlling entity: Sierra 

Nevada Corporation, Sparks, NV); Natel 

Engineering Company, Inc., Chatsworth, 

CA; National Machine Group, Stow, OH; 

National Technical Systems, Inc., 

Calabasas, CA; Naverus, Inc., Kent, WA; 

The NORDAM Group, Inc., Tulsa, OK; 

NYLOK Corporation, Macomb, MI 

(controlling entity: Berkshire Hathaway, 

Inc., Omaha, NE); Oracle USA, Inc., 

Redwood Shores, CA (controlling entity: 

Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores, 

CA); Pall Aeropower Corporation, New 

Port Richey, FL (controlling entity: Pall 

Corporation, East Hills, NY); Pinkerton 

Government Services, Inc., Springfield, 

VA (controlling entity: Securitas 

Security Services, USA, Parsippany, NJ); 

PPG Aerospace, Sylmar, CA (controlling 

entity: PPG Industries, Pittsburgh, PA); 

Science Applications International 

Corporation, San Diego, CA; Siemens 

PLM Software, Plano, TX (controlling 

entity: Siemens AG, Munich, Germany); 

SITA, Atlanta, GA (controlling entity: 

SITA, Geneva, Switzerland); SM&A, 

Newport Beach, CA; Southern California 

Braiding Company, Inc., Bell Gardens, 

CA; Space Exploration Technologies 

Corporation, Hawthorne, CA; Sparton 

Corporation, Jackson, MI; Spirit 

AeroSystems, Inc., Wichita, KS; 

TechniGraphics, Inc., Wooster, OH; 

Timken Aerospace Transmissions, 

LLC—Purdy Systems, Manchester, CT 

(controlling entity: The Timken 

Company, Canton, OH); Vibro-Meter, 

Inc., Manchester, NH (controlling entity: 

Meggitt PLC, Christchurch, Dorset, 

United Kingdom); and WIPRO 

Technologies, Beaverton, OR 

(controlling entity: WIPRO 

Technologies, Bangalore, India). 

3. Change the listing of the following 

Members: ‘‘Analytical Graphics, Inc., 

Malvern, PA’’ to the new listing 

‘‘Analytical Graphics, Inc., Exton, PA’’; 

‘‘BAE Systems North America, Inc., 

Rockville, MD’’ to the new listing ‘‘BAE 

Systems, Inc., Rockville, MD’’; ‘‘B&E 

Tool Company, Inc., Southwick, MA’’ to 

the new listing ‘‘B&E Group, LLC, 

Southwick, MA’’; ‘‘Curtiss-Wright 

Corporation, Lyndhurst, NJ’’ to ‘‘CurtissWright Corporation, Parsippany, NJ’’; 

‘‘E. I. duPont de Nemours & Company, 

Wilmington, DE’’ to ‘‘Dupont Company, 

New Castle, DE’’; ‘‘General Atomics 

Aeronautical Systems, Inc., San Diego, 

CA’’ to ‘‘General Atomics Aeronautical 

Systems, Inc., Poway, CA’’; ‘‘HEICO, 

Miami, FL’’ to ‘‘HEICO Corporation, 

Hollywood, FL’’; ‘‘ITT Industries, Inc., 

McLean, VA’’ to ‘‘ITT Corporation, 

White Plains, NY’’; ‘‘L–3 

Communications Holdings, Inc., New 

York, NY’’ to ‘‘L–3 Communications 

Corporation, New York, NY’’; 

‘‘Raytheon Corporation, Lexington, MA’’ 

to ‘‘Raytheon Company, Waltham, MA’’; 

and ‘‘Woodward Governor Company, 

Rockford, IL’’ to ‘‘Woodward Governor 

Company, Fort Collins, CO’’. 

Dated: July 16, 2009. 

Jeffrey Anspacher, 

Acting Director, Office of Competition and 

Economic Analysis. 

[FR Doc. E9–17268 Filed 7–20–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–201–805] 

Certain Circular Welded Non–Alloy 

Steel Pipe from Mexico; Extension of 

Time Limit for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Maryanne Burke or Robert James, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–5604 or (202) 482– 

0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 1, 2008, the Department 

of Commerce (the Department) received 

a timely request from interested party 

U.S. Steel Corporation to conduct an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

circular welded non–alloy steel pipe 

from Mexico.1 On December 24, 2008, 

the Department published a notice of 

initiation of this administrative review, 

covering the period of November 1, 

2007 to October 31, 2008. See Initiation 

of Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Request for Revocation in Part, 73 FR 

79055 (December 24, 2008). The current 

deadline for the preliminary results of 

this review is August 2, 2009. 

Extension of Time Limits for 

Preliminary Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

the Department to complete the 

preliminary results of an administrative 

review within 245 days after the last day 

of the anniversary month of an order for 

which a review is requested. However, 

if it is not practicable to complete the 

review within this time period, section 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 21, 2009 / Notices 35845 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend the time limit for 

the preliminary results to a maximum of 

365 days after the last day of the 

anniversary month of an order for which 

a review is requested. 

The Department finds it is not 

practicable to complete the preliminary 

results of this review within the original 

time frame because we require 

additional time to analyze Tuberia 

Nacional, S.A. de C.V.’s (TUNA’s) claim 

that it did not have exports, sales or 

entries of subject merchandise to the 

United States during the period of 

review. See TUNA’s ‘‘no shipment’’ 

letter to the Department, dated January 

23, 2009. In light of our ongoing 

changed circumstances review, more 

time is also necessary to consider the 

relationship between Ternium Mexico, 

S.A. de C.V. and Hylsa, S.A. de C.V, a 

mandatory respondent in the instant 

review. See Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review: Certain Circular 

Welded Non–Alloy Steel Pipe and Tube 

from Mexico, 74 FR 28883 (June 18, 

2009). Accordingly, the Department is 

extending the time limit for completion 

of the preliminary results of this 

administrative review until no later than 

November 30, 2009, which is 365 days 

from the last day of the anniversary 

month. We intend to issue the final 

results no later than 120 days after 

publication of the preliminary results 

notice. 

This extension is issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: July 15, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–17278 Filed 7–20–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–580–835] 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils 

from the Republic of Korea: 

Rescission of Countervailing Duty 

Changed Circumstances Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 21, 2009. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the ‘‘Department’’) is rescinding the 

countervailing duty (‘‘CVD’’) changed 

circumstances review of stainless steel 

sheet and strip in coils (‘‘S4’’) from the 

Republic of Korea (‘‘Korea’’), as INI 

Steel Company (‘‘INI’’) was found to be 

the successor–in-interest to Inchon Iron 

and Steel Co., Ltd. (‘‘Inchon’’) in other 

segments of this proceeding. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Magd Zalok or Howard Smith, AD/CVD 

Enforcement Office IV, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–4162 and (202) 

482–5193. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 21, 2001, the 

Department initiated the instant 

changed circumstances review to 

examine whether INI was the successor– 

in-interest to Inchon. See Stainless Steel 

Sheet and Strip in Coils from the 

Republic of Korea: Notice of Initiation of 

Changed Circumstances Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review, 66 FR 

49639 (September 28, 2001). The 

Department published its preliminary 

results in this changed circumstances 

review on June 3, 2002, and 

preliminarily determined that Inchon 

was the successor–in-interest to INI. See 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils 

from the Republic of Korea: Notice of 

Preliminary Results of Changed 

Circumstances Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review, 67 FR 38257 

(June 3, 2002) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 

We gave interested parties 10 days to 

comment on the Preliminary Results. 

The Department received no comments. 

Scope of the Order 

The products subject to the order are 

certain stainless steel sheet and strip in 

coils. Stainless steel is an alloy steel 

containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or 

less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more 

of chromium, with or without other 

elements. The subject sheet and strip is 

a flat–rolled product in coils that is 

greater than 9.5 mm in width and less 

than 4.75 mm in thickness and that is 

annealed or otherwise heat treated and 

pickled or otherwise descaled. The 

subject sheet and strip may also be 

further processed (e.g., cold–rolled, 

polished, aluminized, coated), provided 

that it maintains the specific 

dimensions of sheet and strip following 

such processing. 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is currently classifiable in the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) at 

subheadings: 7219.13.00.30, 

7219.13.00.50, 7219.13.00.70, 

7219.13.00.80, 7219.14.00.30, 

7219.14.00.65, 7219.14.00.90, 

7219.32.00.05, 7219.32.00.20, 

7219.32.00.25, 7219.32.00.35, 

7219.32.00.36, 7219.32.00.38, 

7219.32.00.42, 7219.32.00.44, 

7219.33.00.05, 7219.33.00.20, 

7219.33.00.25, 7219.33.00.35, 

7219.33.00.36, 7219.33.00.38, 

7219.33.00.42, 7219.33.00.44, 

7219.34.00.05, 7219.34.00.20, 

7219.34.00.25, 7219.34.00.30, 

7219.34.00.35, 7219.35.00.05, 

7219.35.00.15, 7219.35.00.30, 

7219.35.00.35, 7219.90.00.10, 

7219.90.00.20, 7219.90.00.25, 

7219.90.00.60, 7219.90.00.80, 

7220.12.10.00, 

7220.12.50.00,7220.20.10.10, 

7220.20.10.15, 7220.20.10.60, 

7220.20.10.80, 7220.20.60.05, 

7220.20.60.10, 7220.20.60.15, 

7220.20.60.60, 7220.20.60.80, 

7220.20.70.05, 7220.20.70.10, 

7220.20.70.15, 7220.20.70.60, 

7220.20.70.80, 7220.20.80.00, 

7220.20.90.30, 7220.20.90.60, 

7220.90.00.10, 7220.90.00.15, 

7220.90.00.60, and 7220.90.00.80. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the Department’s written 

description of the merchandise is 

dispositive. 

Excluded from the scope of the order 

are the following: (1) sheet and strip that 

is not annealed or otherwise heat treated 

and pickled or otherwise descaled, (2) 

sheet and strip that is cut to length, (3) 

plate (i.e., flat–rolled stainless steel 

products of a thickness of 4.75 mm or 

more), (4) flat wire (i.e., cold–rolled 

sections, with a prepared edge, 

rectangular in shape, of a width of not 

more than 9.5 mm), and (5) razor blade 

steel. Razor blade steel is a flat rolled 

product of stainless steel, not further 

worked than cold–rolled (cold– 

reduced), in coils, of a width of not 

more than 23 mm and a thickness of 

0.266 mm or less, containing, by weight, 

12.5 to 14.5 percent chromium, and 

certified at the time of entry to be used 

in the manufacture of razor blades. See 

Chapter 72 of the HTSUS, ‘‘Additional 

U.S. Note’’1(d). 

The Department has determined that 

certain specialty stainless steel products 

are also excluded from the scope of the 

order. These excluded products are 

described below. 

Flapper valve steel is defined as 

stainless steel strip in coils containing, 

by weight, between 0.37 and 0.43 

percent carbon, between 1.15 and 1.35 

percent molybdenum, and between 0.20 

and 0.80 percent manganese. This steel 

also contains, by weight, phosphorus of 

0.025 percent or less, silicon of between 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES