alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:11-cv-03305-WJM-MF   Document 5   Filed 08/05/11   Page 1 of 13 PageID: 27

Case 2:11-cv-03305-WJM-MF   Document 5   Filed 08/05/11   Page 2 of 13 PageID: 28

Case 2:11-cv-03305-WJM-MF   Document 5   Filed 08/05/11   Page 3 of 13 PageID: 29

Case 2:11-cv-03305-WJM-MF   Document 5   Filed 08/05/11   Page 4 of 13 PageID: 30

Case 2:11-cv-03305-WJM-MF   Document 5   Filed 08/05/11   Page 5 of 13 PageID: 31

Case 2:11-cv-03305-WJM-MF   Document 5   Filed 08/05/11   Page 6 of 13 PageID: 32

Case 2:11-cv-03305-WJM-MF   Document 5   Filed 08/05/11   Page 7 of 13 PageID: 33

Case 2:11-cv-03305-WJM-MF   Document 5   Filed 08/05/11   Page 8 of 13 PageID: 34

Case 2:11-cv-03305-WJM-MF   Document 5   Filed 08/05/11   Page 9 of 13 PageID: 35

Case 2:11-cv-03305-WJM-MF   Document 5   Filed 08/05/11   Page 10 of 13 PageID: 36

Case 2:11-cv-03305-WJM-MF   Document 5   Filed 08/05/11   Page 11 of 13 PageID: 37

Case 2:11-cv-03305-WJM-MF   Document 5   Filed 08/05/11   Page 12 of 13 PageID: 38

Case 2:11-cv-03305-WJM-MF   Document 5   Filed 08/05/11   Page 13 of 13 PageID: 39
Exhibit No. 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Juhl Wind, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the undersigned’s knowledge:





(1)   the Report of the Company filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  May 12, 2011
/s/John P. MitolaJohn P. MitolaPresident
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Hon. Dennis M. Cavanaugh

v. Crim. No. 11—459

BLAS ERNERS ESPINAL”CABRERA,: ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE

a/k/a “Hermano”

This matter having come before the Court on the joint

application of Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the

District of New Jersey (by Mary E. Toscano, Assistant U.S.

Attorney), and defendant BIAS ERNERS ESPINAL-CABRERA (by Patrick

J. Brackley), for an order granting a continuance of the

proceedings in the above-captioned matter, and the defendant

being aware that he has the right to have the matter brought to

trial within 70 days of the date of his appearance before a

judicial officer of this court pursuant to Title 18 of the United

States Code, Section 3161(c) (1), and five continuances having

previously been approved by the Court in this matter, and as the

defendant has consented to such a continuance, and for good and

sufficient cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should

be continued for the following reasons:.

(1) Plea negotiations are currently in progress, and

both the United States and the defendant desire additional time
CD C) CD)

C C) CD

1) cv9 -+ CD

cv CD

cv CD

cv cv

—

cv -TI

cvcv

—

-

cv TI CD

0

C) CD -1

CD C) CD CD

cv CD cv TI

cv CD U)

CD (1) CD

H cv cv

CD Cl. C)

CD CD Cl) Ce

cv cvCD

0 CD

C) CD CD

0

CD cv

U)

H

CD

U) CD

CD CD

cv e- cv

CD C)cv cv CDTI CO

cv U)

cv

çt TI CD

< cv

o cv CD

TI) CD CD

C)

CD C).

cvcv

CD Ce

CD TI CU

cv cv

t

CD UI cvCD Ce U)CD CD

( cv ()

TQ C)

cv cv.

CD cv

CD CD

cv

Co

CD cv

(U (1

cv

:1) CD

cv cv

TI

H

El

H

(I

U)0cv

cv0

CDCD0

TI

cvcv

H

1) CD

cv cv

Ii)

CD CD

Cl C.

1)

Cl

CD

cvcv

CD C)

TIcvCDC

cv

CD

CoCl)CD

CD(U,

UICD

C)

CD

CD

CD

çt (U,

)

cC

C. ‘P

CD )

cv cv CD

cv cv ‘- cvCD TI U) TI

T< CD

CD C) Cl) C) C) CD

C) CO CD cD CD CD

H

TI CD C)CD CD CD ) CD

cv CD CD CD CD CD C1

CD C) CD cv CD

CD

U TI ON CD

CD 1) 0) CD

0 CD CD CD

CD U) CD (I CD 1)

CD C) Cv cv TI

C) cv CD

H CD cv

TI) t- U) TI)

CD CD CD

0

C’ CD CD. CD TICO CD cv TI CD cv

—i cv

0 U)

CD C) • cv cv cv C)

X cv

0 cv

cv cv CD

CD C) CD CD CD

D CD

< C) CD

CD cv CD

CI U)

CD TI CD CD ‘ 0 cv

CD

L C C) 1 4 C) C. ‘ C)

t N) ..

C)

O C)

0 CD cv cvC)

0 cv

H

CD C)

CI - Ci) cv C)

CD C) CD CDCD 1) CD

H

cv CD

C1

cC) C’ cv CD

D

CD C) U) CD CD

H

CD CD cv

C) CD TI C)

‘P cv C) CD

C) CD cv C)

CD CD ON) CD CDcv CD CD

0. CD cvcv CD CD

C) C) cv

CD CD

C’

C) CD

TI)

C

CD C)CD cv

CD

UN CC

CD

C) CD

cv

CD

CD cvcvTI U)cD CD

cv CDcv cvcv

u

0C) cv

U) cC)U) TI

cv cv

TI cv

H C) (U

cvCD

CDCD

0CD

0cv

CDCDCD

cv

TIcv

H

TI

cvcv

CDCr

TI

CD

F)

cv

cv

CD CD

CD•(U

CDU

CD

(I CD

CDZU) H)CDU)cv

U

CD C)

CDTICD CD

CDCD

CD

C4C)D

0.

cC)

cv
EX-99.4
      CONFIRMATION OF PROVISIONAL PATENT APPLICATION

            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE


Bryan Haddox
10260 Washington St. #1818
Thornton, CO 80229

Receipt is acknowledged of this provisional Patent Application. It
will not be examined for patentability and will become abandoned not
later than twelve months after its filing date.  Be sure to provide
the US. APPLICATION NUMBER, FILING DATE, NAME OF APPLICANT, and TITLE
OF INVENTION when inquiring about this application.  Fees transmitted
by check or draft are subject to collection.  Please verify the
accuracy of the data presented on this receipt.  If an error is noted
on this Filing Receipt, please write to the Office of Initial Patent
Examination's Filing Receipt Corrections, facsimile number 703-
746~9195.  Please provide a copy of this Filing Receipt with the
changes noted thereon.  If you received a "Notice to File Missing
Parts" for this application, please submit any corrections to this
Filing Receipt with your reply to the Notice.  When the USPTO
processes the reply to the Notice, the USPTO will generate another
Filing Receipt incorporating the requested corrections (if
appropriate).

Applicant(s)

Bryan W. Haddox, Thornton, CO.
Roy F. Bishop, Lafayette, CO.

Power of Attorney: None

If Required, Foreign Filing License Granted: 09/02/2004

The number of your priority application, to be used for filing abroad
under the Paris Convention is: US60/589,022

Projected Publication Date: None.  Application is not eligible for
pre-grant publication.

Non-Publication Request: No

Early Publication Request: No
HOUSEHOLD DATA HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES ANNUAL AVERAGES

27. Unemployed persons by reason for unemployment, sex, and age

(Numbers in thousands)

Reason

Total,

16 years

and over

Men,

20 years

and over

Women,

20 years

and over

Both sexes,

16 to 19

years

2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010

NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYED

 Total unemployed .................................................................. 14,265 14,825 7,555 7,763 5,157 5,534 1,552 1,528

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs .......... 9,160 9,250 5,796 5,773 3,093 3,257 271 220

 On temporary layoff ................................................................ 1,630 1,431 1,103 946 450 416 77 68

 Not on temporary layoff .......................................................... 7,530 7,819 4,694 4,827 2,642 2,840 194 152

 Permanent job losers ............................................................ 6,129 6,404 3,794 3,905 2,202 2,396 133 104

 Persons who completed temporary jobs .............................. 1,401 1,415 899 922 440 444 61 48

Job leavers ............................................................................... 882 889 407 433 419 413 56 42

Reentrants ................................................................................ 3,187 3,466 1,190 1,346 1,449 1,633 548 487

New entrants ............................................................................ 1,035 1,220 162 211 196 231 677 778

PERCENT DISTRIBUTION

 Total unemployed .................................................................. 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs .......... 64.2 62.4 76.7 74.4 60.0 58.8 17.5 14.4

 On temporary layoff ............................................................... 11.4 9.6 14.6 12.2 8.7 7.5 5.0 4.5

 Not on temporary layoff ......................................................... 52.8 52.7 62.1 62.2 51.2 51.3 12.5 10.0

Job leavers ............................................................................... 6.2 6.0 5.4 5.6 8.1 7.5 3.6 2.8

Reentrants ................................................................................ 22.3 23.4 15.8 17.3 28.1 29.5 35.3 31.9

New entrants ............................................................................ 7.3 8.2 2.1 2.7 3.8 4.2 43.6 50.9

UNEMPLOYED AS A PERCENT OF THE

 CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs .......... 5.9 6.0 7.3 7.3 4.5 4.7 4.2 3.7

Job leavers ............................................................................... .6 .6 .5 .5 .6 .6 .9 .7

Reentrants ................................................................................ 2.1 2.3 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.4 8.6 8.2

New entrants ............................................................................ .7 .8 .2 .3 .3 .3 10.6 13.2

 NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

44
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         I, Moshe BenBassat, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of ClickSoftware Technologies Ltd. on Form 10-K/A for the year
ended December 31, 2001 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of ClickSoftware Technologies Ltd.



January 24, 2003



                                     By:     /s/ MOSHE BENBASSAT
                                        ------------------------
                                     Name:  Moshe BenBassat
                                     Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10-K ClickSoftware Technologies Ltd.                                     Page 79
Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW-LHG   Document 176   Filed 02/11/14   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 5383

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW-LHG   Document 176   Filed 02/11/14   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 5384
#### Dana, Ex’x, *v.*Parker.

*(Circuit Court, D. Massachusetts.*

April 9, 1886.)

Action—Parties—Jotnt Bono.

S. L. B. and 36. B. "became sureties on a trustee’s bond, and P. and H. ex ecuted a bond as sureties to indemnify them. E. B. indorsed on the trustee’s bond an agreement to indemnify S. L. B. Subsequently tbe executrix of E. B brought suit on tbe bond against P *Held,*that as it did not appear that S. L B., the joint obligee, was not living, the plaintiff was not the proper party U sue, and that the suit should be dismissed.

At Law.

*A. S. Wait,*for plaintiff.

*Hutchins & Wheeler,*for defendant.

*264.Colt, J.

In 1871 John H. Swasey, of Boston, applied to the probate court for the county of Grafton, in the state of New Hampshire, to be appointed trustee for Benjamin M. Swasey; and it being necessary for him to furnish two sureties, residents of New Hampshire, upon his bond, Edmund Burke, the plaintiff’s testator, and Shepherd L. Bowers agreed to become sureties, provided they were secured by a bond of indemnity, with the defendant, Parker, and one Jacob Hittinger, as sureties thereon. The bond of indemnity was given, and is the subject-matter of the present suit. The suit is brought by the executrix of Burke, one of the two joint obligees, against Parker, one of the sureties on the bond. Tb„ case comes before the court on an agreed statement of facts. At the outset the objection is raised by the defendant that the plaintiff is not the proper person to bring the action. We think the objection well taken. It does not appear but what Bowers, the joint obligee, is living, and, if so, he is the proper person to bring suit, for, Burke being dead, the right of action survives to the other joint obligee. Dicey, Parties, 128; *Donnell*v. *Manson,*109 Mass. 576. “It is an elemental principle of the common law that where a contract is joint and not several, all the joint obligees who are alive must be joined as plaintiffs, and that the defendant can object to a non-joinder of plaintiffs, not only by demurrer, but in arrest of judgment, under the plea of the general issue.” *Farni*v. *Tesson,*1 Black, 309, 315.

The fact that Burke indorsed on the bond of indemnity an agreement to indemnify Bowers cannot affect the question now raised, nor can it be said that the agreement of facts operated as a waiver of this objection, because the legal right.to bring the action does not exist in the plaintiff, but in Bowers, the surviving joint obligee. Suit dismissed.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JAN 24, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-12029

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 02-03165 CV-CAP-1

DOCTOR’S HOSPITAL AUGUSTA,

Assignee of Candace A. Murray, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

HORTON HOMES, INC.,

Defendant-Cross

Defendant-Appellee,

ACS BENEFIT SERVICES, INC.,

J. SMITH LANIER AND CO.

ADMINISTRATORS, INC.,

Defendants-Cross

Claimants.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

 Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(January 24, 2007)

Before ANDERSON and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and STROM,* District

Judge.

_______________

*Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska, sitting by

designation.
2

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument and careful consideration, we conclude that the district

court is due to be affirmed because plaintiff has not proved that the decision of the

plan administrator was wrong. The evidence before the decision-maker clearly

indicated that Candace was not “principally dependent” on her father, the covered

employee.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.2




Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of
Title 18 of the United States Code




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NTR Acquisition Co. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, William E. Hantke, Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






/s/
      William E. HantkeWilliam
      E. HantkePrincipal
      Financial OfficerNovember
      12, 2008




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has
been provided to NTR Acquisition Co. and will be retained by NTR Acquisition Co.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PRIMEDIA Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew A. Flynn, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



/s/MATTHEW A. FLYNN

Matthew A.
Flynn Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

NOEL VELASQUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF PASSAIC,

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action No. 11-2075 (SRC)

OPINION

CHESLER, District Judge

This matter was initiated by Order To Show Cause, issued by Magistrate Judge Shipp on

July 14, 2011, directing pro se Plaintiff Noel Velasquez to show cause why the magistrate judge

should not recommend that the district court dismiss this action for failure by Plaintiff to

prosecute his action and to comply with court orders directing him to appear for conferences. 

The Order To Show Cause expressly warned that should Plaintiff fail to appear in person to show

cause as ordered, Judge Shipp would recommend that the district judge dismiss this action. Judge

Shipp issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on January 13, 2012 pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 72(b), L. Civ. R. 72.1(a)(2), and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) [docket entry 10]. According

to the R&R, Plaintiff neither appeared as required by the Order To Show Cause nor filed a prehearing written submission. 

Judge Shipp recommends that this Court dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37, which permits the Court to “dismiss the action . . . or render

a judgment by default against the disobedient party.” Roadway Express v. Piper, 447 U.S. 752,

Case 2:11-cv-02075-SRC -MAS Document 12 Filed 01/31/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 64
763 (1980) (citations omitted). The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) (“Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and

file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of

court.”). No objections to it have been filed. This Court has reviewed Judge Shipp’s R&R. It

accepts and agrees with Judge Shipp’s findings and recommendation in whole. Plaintiff’s noncompliance with court orders, apparent disinterest in prosecuting his case and overall dilatory

behavior warrant imposing the sanction of dismissal pursuant to Rule 37.

Accordingly, this Court will adopt the R&R issued on January 13, 2012 [docket entry 10]

as the opinion of the Court and will dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 37. An appropriate form of Order will be filed.

 s/Stanley R. Chesler 

STANLEY R. CHESLER

United States District Judge

DATED: January 31, 2012

2

Case 2:11-cv-02075-SRC -MAS Document 12 Filed 01/31/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 65
**Exhibit
      23.2**









**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
      S-8 No. 333-45260) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Option and Restricted Stock
      Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-45262) pertaining to the
      2000
      Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
      333-62024) pertaining to the 2001 Supplemental Stock Option Plan and the
      Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-115788) pertaining to the Airspan
      Omnibus Equity Compensation plan 2003 Supplemental Stock Option Plan 2000
      Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Airspan Networks, Inc. of our report dated
      April
      27, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule
      of
      Airspan Networks, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
      year
      ended December 31, 2005.







Ernst
      & Young LLP







London,
      England


April
      27,
      2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-28-1997
<CASH>                                         7254
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15060
<ALLOWANCES>                                   933
<INVENTORY>                                    12818
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               36227
<PP&E>                                         78868
<DEPRECIATION>                                 37324
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 84299
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          37354
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       23110
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   84299
<SALES>                                        283371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               288073
<CGS>                                          254405
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  254405
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               104
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (894)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   403
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1297)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1297)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
Case 3:11-cv-04155-MLC-LHG Document 1 Filed 07/19/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 1
Case 3:11-cv-04155-MLC-LHG Document 1 Filed 07/19/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 2
Case 3:11-cv-04155-MLC-LHG Document 1 Filed 07/19/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 3