alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:11-cv-01699-SDW -MCA Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 1
Case 2:11-cv-01699-SDW -MCA Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 2 of 9 PageID: 2
Case 2:11-cv-01699-SDW -MCA Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 3 of 9 PageID: 3
Case 2:11-cv-01699-SDW -MCA Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 4 of 9 PageID: 4
Case 2:11-cv-01699-SDW -MCA Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 5 of 9 PageID: 5
Case 2:11-cv-01699-SDW -MCA Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 6 of 9 PageID: 6
Case 2:11-cv-01699-SDW -MCA Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 7 of 9 PageID: 7
Case 2:11-cv-01699-SDW -MCA Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 8 of 9 PageID: 8
Case 2:11-cv-01699-SDW -MCA Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 9 of 9 PageID: 9
#### Sherry A. BULLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KRAFT FOODS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11-2404.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 20, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 27, 2012.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg, Law Office of Michael D.J. Eisenberg, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. John B. Flood, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before KING, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sherry A. Bullock appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in her suit alleging violations of the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) and under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.**Bullock v. Kraft Foods, Inc.,*2011 WL 5872898 (E.D.Va. Nov. 22, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 In addition, we note that Bullock’s claim that she was not sufficiently paid for dates incorrectly scheduled outside of her medical restrictions in September 2007 was waived by failure to argue it to the district court. *See Aziz v. Alcolac, Inc.,*658 F.3d 388, 394 n. 6 (4th Cir.2011) ("In the normal course, we do not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal .... ”). Further, Bullock’s claim of improper retroactive designation of FMLA leave fails for lack of prejudice. *See Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.,*535 U.S. 81, 89, 122 S.Ct. 1155, 152 L.Ed.2d 167 (2002).
# Major Work Stoppages (Annual)

"The Major Work Stoppages release contains annual data on work stoppages (strikes and lockouts) involving 1,000 or more workers lasting one full shift or longer in the United States. The release is a compilation of detailed work stoppages released monthly and provides statistics, analysis, and details of each work stoppage of 1,000 or more workers that occurred during the year. For more details, visit the Work Stoppages home page at www.bls.gov/wsp."

- There are 33 major work stoppages beginning in 2023, idling 458,900 workers
- There are 23 major work stoppages beginning in 2022, idling 120,600 workers
- In 2021, 16 major work stoppages began in the year, idling 80,700 workers
- In 2020 there were 8 major work stoppages, the third lowest number since 1947
- 25 major work stoppages in 2019 is the largest number in the 2010-2019 decade
- 20 major strikes and lockouts idle 485,000 workers in 2018
- Number of work stoppages is 7 in 2017; second lowest on record
- Lowest decade on record for number of major work stoppages, averaging 14 per year
- 12 major strikes and lockouts idle 47,000 workers in 2015
- 11 major strikes and lockouts in 2014, lowest since 2010
- In 2013, there were 15 major strikes and lockouts involving 55,000 workers
- 19 major strikes and lockouts involving 148,000 workers in 2012
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5087 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-Hydroxy-4-[(4-methyl-2- 

sulfophenyl)azo]-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid, calcium salt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2004 

Mr. BERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-Hydroxy-4-[(4-methyl2-sulfophenyl)azo]-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid, calcium salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 3-HYDROXY-4-[(4- 

4 METHYL-2-SULFOPHENYL)AZO]-2- 

5 NAPHTHALENECARBOXYLIC ACID, CALCIUM 

6 SALT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

9 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

10 new heading: 
2 

•HR 5087 IH 

‘‘ 9902.35.15 3-Hydroxy-4-[(4-methyl-2- 

sulfophenyl)azo]-2- 

naphthalenecarboxylic acid, 

calcium salt (CAS No. 

5281–04–9) (provided for in 

subheading 3204.17.90) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2007 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           129,197
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0 
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 136,937                   
<CASH>                                           2,287
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          34,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 914,314
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 88,690
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          736,499
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,288
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   914,314 
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              4,541
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 203
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   5,215
<BENEFITS>                                       2,495
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      1,405
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             3,872
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,187
<INCOME-TAX>                                       766
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,421
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EX-10.112



 Exhibit 10.112 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER FIVE TO 
 THE METLIFE PLAN FOR TRANSITION ASSISTANCE
FOR OFFICERS 
 (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2010) 

THE METLIFE PLAN FOR TRANSITION ASSISTANCE FOR OFFICERS (the “Plan”) is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2012, as
follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 1.4.05(d) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new subsection (5) after subsection (4) to read as follows:


 “(5) Appendix A of the MetLife Bank Enhanced Severance and Retention Plan for Servicing Employees at Salary
Grades 29 and Above” 
  

	 	2.	Section 4.3 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the phrase “provided that the Participant has granted a Separation Agreement” at the end of the
first sentence therein. 

  

	 	3.	Section 5.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the phrase “Except for those participating in the plans set forth in Section 1.4.05(d),” at the
beginning of the second sentence thereof. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company has caused
this amendment to be executed by an officer thereunto duly authorized on the date noted below the officer’s signature. 
  

			
	METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
		
	By:	 	/s/ Mark Davis


			
		
	Name/Title:	 	 Mark Davis–Vice President/
 Plan Administrator



			
		
	Date:	 	12-26-2012


			
		
	Witness:	 	/s/ Andrew Bernstein
Exhibit
No. 32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Juhl Wind, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, the Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002 that, to the undersigned’s knowledge:





(1)   the
Report of the Company filed today fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




Date:  May 17,
    2010
                /s/John J. BrandJohn
      J. BrandPrincipal
      Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5298 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5298

To amend title 4, United States Code, to clarify the treatment of self-
    employment for purposes of the limitation on State taxation of 
                           retirement income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2004

  Mr. Cannon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 4, United States Code, to clarify the treatment of self-
    employment for purposes of the limitation on State taxation of 
                           retirement income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF SELF-EMPLOYMENT FOR PURPOSES 
              OF THE LIMITATION ON STATE TAXATION OF RETIREMENT INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Section 114(b)(1)(I) of title 4, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting ``including such a plan, program, or 
arrangement for a self-employed individual,'' after ``section 
3121(v)(2)(C) of such Code,''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
amounts received after December 31, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40265

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HUGO CASTILLO-CHAVEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B:97-CR-480-1

- - - - - - - - - -

March 16, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Hugo Castillo-Chavez appeals the sentence he received after

he pleaded guilty to illegal entry into the United States after

having been deported. The record does not support Castillo’s

argument that the district court mistakenly believed it could not

depart downwardly based on Castillo’s purported assimilation into

this country. Thus, this court lacks jurisdiction to review that

issue. See United States v. Palmer, 122 F.3d 215, 222 (5th Cir.
No. 98-40265

-2-

1997). Further, Castillo is not entitled to a downward departure

based on the quantity of drugs involved in his prior convictions. 

See U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A), comment. (n.5); Koon v. United

States, 518 U.S. 81, 92 (1996). Lastly, Castillo’s argument that

his prior convictions for possession of drugs do not qualify as

aggravated felonies for purposes of § 2L1.2 identifies no error, 

plain or otherwise. See United States v. Rodriguez, 15 F.3d 408,

414 (5th Cir., 1994); United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez, 130 F.3d

691, 693 (5th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1722** 

SILVIO BITTENCOURT BAPTISTA , Petitioner ,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : February 11, 2016 Decided: March 14, 2016

Before KING, DIAZ, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Petition d ismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Hashim G. Jeelani, Royal Oak, Michigan , for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Jennifer P. Levings, Senior Litigation Counsel, Laura Halliday Hickein , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not bin ding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Silvio Bittencourt Baptista , a native and citizen of Brazil , petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigratio n Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. For the reasons set forth below, we dismiss the petition for review. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) (20 12 ), entitled “Denials of discretionary relief,” “no court shall have jurisdiction to review any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section . . . 1229b,” which is the section governin g cancellation of removal. In this case , the immigration judge found, and the Board agreed, that Baptista failed to meet his burden of establishing tha t his United States citizen child would suffer exceptional and extremely unusual hardship if Baptista is r eturned to Brazil. We conclude that this determination is clea rly discretionary in nature, and we therefore lack jurisdiction to review challenges to this finding absent a colorable constitutional claim or question of law

. See Sattani v. Holder , 749 F.3d 368, 372 (5th Cir. 2014) (finding no jurisdiction to review determination that aliens failed to demonstrate requisite hardship to their U.S. citizen son); Obioha v. Gonzales , 431 F.3d 400, 405 (4th Cir. 2005) (“It is quite clear that the gatekeeper provision [of3 § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i)] bars our jurisdiction to review a decision of the [Board] to actually deny a petition for cancellation of removal.”) ; Okpa v. INS , 266 F.3d 313, 317 (4th Cir. 2001) (concluding, under transitional rules, that issue of hardship is committed to agency discretion and is not subject to appellate review)

. We have reviewed Baptista’s claims of error and conclude that he fails to raise a colorable constitutional claim or question of law under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D) (2012). See Gomis v. Holder , 571 F.3d 353, 358 (4th Cir. 2009) (“[A]bsent a colorable constitutional claim or question of law, our review of the issue is not authori zed by § 1252(a)(2)(D).” (emphasis added)). Accordingly, we grant the Attorney General’s pending motion to dismiss and dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pr ese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DISMISSED
an

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES v. BRIHEEM NERO

PETITION FOR
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

1. BRIHEEM NERO, DOBAEMEIERBBSBI#: 218095C, is now confined to Passaic County
Correctional Facility.

2. BRIHEEM NERO, DOB: SBi#: 218095C will be required at the United States Court

House in Newark, New Jersey before the Hon. Katherine S. Hayden, U.S. District Judge, on
Thursday, January 18, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., for a Status Conference, in the above-captioned case.
A Writ of Habeas Corpus should be issued for that purpose.

DATED: January 9, 2012 Khe J
Newark, NJ Fabiana Pierre-Louis, Assistant U.S. Attorney
Petitioner
ORDER

Let the Writ Issue.
Bu
Ie : IR f
Hon. Katherine S. Hayden, U.S.D.J.
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

The United States of America to Warden of Passaic County Correctional Facility
WE COMMAND YOU that you have the body of

DATED: } 1)

BRIHEEM NERO, DOB: Bi#t: 218095C

now confined at the Passaic County Correctional Facility, brought before the United States
District Court, before the Hon. Katherine S. Hayden, U.S. District Judge, on Thursday, January
18, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., for a Status Conference

WITNESS the Hon. Katherine S. Hayden
United States District Judge

Newark, New Jersey.

DATED: pole

7
/
Exhibit No. 32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of Juhl Wind, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), on Form 10Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act
of 2002 that, to the undersigned’s knowledge:





(1)   the
Report of the Company filed today fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and





(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






Date: November
      15, 2010
            /s/John
      P. MitolaJohn
      P. MitolaPresident
Exhibit 4.3

 

	
 
    	
Richard J. Bradfield

Senior Vice President and Treasurer

PHH Corporation

3000 Leadenhall Road

Mt. Laurel, NJ   08054
    


 

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549

 

February 28, 2013

 

Subject:   PHH Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 – File No. 001-07797

 

To whom it may concern:

 

Neither PHH Corporation (the “Company”) nor any of its consolidated subsidiaries has outstanding any instrument with respect to long-term debt not being registered under which the total amount of securities authorized thereunder exceeds 10% of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis other than those instruments filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. In accordance with paragraph (b)(4)(iii) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR Sec. 229.601), the Company hereby agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of each instrument that defines the rights of holders of such long term debt and that is not filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

 

	
Very truly yours,
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
PHH Corporation
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Richard J. Bradfield
    	
 
    
	
Richard J. Bradfield
    	
 
    
	
Senior Vice President and Treasurer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

KIRKER ENTERPRISES, INC.,

Plaintiff

 V. SUMMONS IN A CIVIL CASE

EXPRESSION BEAUTY WORKS, INC., ET AL.,

Defendant

CASE NUMBER: 2:11−CV−02541−FSH −PS

 TO: (Name and address of Defendant):

 A lawsuit has been filed against you.

 Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) −− or 60 days if

you are the United States or a United States Agency, or an office or employee of the United States described in

Fed. R. civ. P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) −− you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a

motion under rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the

plaintiff or plaintiff`s attorney, whose name and address are:

 If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the

complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

WILLIAM T. WALSH

 CLERK

 Leroy Dunbar

 (By) DEPUTY CLERK

ISSUED ON 2011−05−05 15:22:28.0, Clerk

USDC NJD

Case 2:11-cv-02541-FSH -PS Document 4 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 37
RETURN OF SERVICE

 Service of the Summons and complaint was made by me (1) DATE

 NAME OF SERVER (PRINT) TITLE

 Check one box below to indicate appropriate method of service

Served personally upon the defendant. Place where served: _______________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

Left copies thereof at the defendant's dwelling house or usual place of abode with a person of suitable age and

discretion then residing therein.

Name of person with whom the summons and complaint were left:__________________________________

Returned unexecuted:_____________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

Other (specify) :_________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF SERVICE FEES

 TRAVEL SERVICES TOTAL

DECLARATION OF SERVER

 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Return of Service and Statement of Service Fees is true and correct.

Executed on ___________________ _______________________________________

Date Signature of Server

_______________________________________

Address of Server

Case 2:11-cv-02541-FSH -PS Document 4 Filed 05/05/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 38