alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit_4-7.htm










Exhibit 4.7







SUMMARY OF LEASE AGREEMENTS


 



Lease agreement dated May 28, 2000, as amended and supplemented on August 21, 2000, February 20, 2003, November 1, 2005, May 7, 2007, October 30, 2010, May 15, 2011, June 15, 2012, July 5, 2012 and February 28, 2013 (together: the “Integrated Agreement”).


 





	
1.

	
Parties:


	  	
Ef-Shar Ltd. Israel ("EfShar")


Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. ("Nova")







 



	
2.

	
The premises


	  	
Certain areas in building 22, Weizmann Scientific Park, Ness-Ziona, Israel (6,300 square meters).


Certain areas in buildings 16 and 18, Weizmann Scientific Park, Ness-Ziona, Israel (1,126 square meters).


Total square meters: approximately 7,426.


Parking spaces.







 



	
3.

	
Leasing period


	  	
The premises are currently leased until January 31, 2016.







 



	
4.

	
Cost of leasehold improvements


	  	
Nova will bear the costs of leasehold improvements.







 



	
5.

	
Guarantees


	  	
Nova shall pay the rent payments and maintenance fees in advance for the following three months on the 1st of every third month. 


Guarantee - Nova will issue an autonomous bank guarantee for this lease in the amount equal to 6-9 months’ rent payments and maintenance fees plus VAT, according to the leased area.







 



	
6.

	
Insurance


	  	
Insurance for the construction work and “all risks” insurance, property insurance, third party insurance and employer liability insurance.







 


Lease Agreement dated September 19, 2012, as supplemented on October 15, 2012.


 



	
1.

	
Parties:


	  	
Darban Investments Ltd. (“Darban”)


Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. (“Nova”)







 



	
2.

	
The premises


	  	
Certain areas in parcel 185 in block 3695 at Tamar Park in Rehovot, Israel (705 square meters).


Parking Spaces.







 



	
3.

	
Leasing period


	  	
The lease period is for two (2) years from the first transfer of possession (the “Original Lease Period”).














  





  











  






 



	
4.

	
Option for additional lease period


	  	
Nova has an option to extend the lease for an additional lease period of one (1) year (the “Extended Lease Period”).







 



	
5.

	
Guarantees


	  	
Nova will deposit an autonomous bank guarantee equal to 5 months of Lease Payments and maintenance fees, which shall be repayable in installments without proof of damage.







 



	
6.

	
Insurance


	  	
Insurance for the construction work and “all risks” insurance, Property insurance, Third Party insurance and Employer liability insurance.
PROFESSIONAL CORP. El P Subs For Panel Attorney DY Standby Counsel

3131 PRINCETON PIKE, BLDG. 3D. STE 200 Prior Attorney’s

LAWRENCEVILLE NJ 08648 Appointment Dates ‘ Because the above-named person represented has testified under oath or has otherwise

Telephone Number: (fl0)43Q_770O satisfied tIns Court thai he or sIte ( I) is financially unable to employ counsel and (2) does not

ss’msli to svaive counsel, and because tIme interests ofjusimce so require, the attorney svhose

14. NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS OF LAW FIRM Only provide per m.structions) name appears in Item 12 is appointed to represent this person in this case, OR

SAME

U Other (See Instnj

Signature of Presiding Judicial Officer or By Order of the Court

R!15 /7 16

Date of Order Nunc Pro Tune Date

Repayment or partial repayment ordered from the person represented for this service at timeappointment. El YES El NO

CLAIM FOR SERVICES AND EXPENSES FOR COURT USE ONLY

HO TOTAL MATH/TECH. MATH/TECH. D

CATEGORIES (‘4ttach itemization ofservices wit/i dates) CLAIMED AMOUNT ADJUSTED ADJUSTED A DITIONAL CLAIMED HOURS AMOUNT

15. a. Arraignment and/or Plea

b. Bail and Detention Hearings

c. Motion Hearingsd. Trial

e. Sentencing Hearingsf. Revocation Hearingsg. Appeals Court

Is. Other (Specm’ oti additional sheets) ‘pmt::’” .

(RATE PER HOUR S ‘) TOTALS:

16. a. Interviews and Conferences :,

b. Obtaining and reviewing records .c. Legal research and brief writingd. Travel time

e. Investigative and other work (SpeciJj on additional .5/meets)

(RATE PER HOUR = $ ) TOTALS:

17. Travel Expenses (lodging, parking, meals, mileage, etc.)

18. Other Expenses (other than expert, transcripts, etc.,)

GRAND TOTALS (CLAIMED AND ADJUSTED):

19. CERTIFICATION OF ATTORNEY/PAYEE FOR THE PERIOD OF SERVICE 20. APPOINTMENT TERMINATION DATE 21. CASE DISPOSITION

IF OTHER THAN CASE COMPLETION

TO:

22 CLAIM STATUS El Final Payment El Interim Payment Number Q Supplemental Payment

Have you previously applied to the court for compensation and/or reimbursement for this °°1FJ YES El NO If yes, were you paid? El YES U NOOther than from the Court, have you, or to your knowledge has anyone else, received payment (‘compensatton or anything of value, from any other source in connection with this

representation’ o YES El NO lfes, give details on additional sheets

I swear or affirm the truth or correctness of the above statements.

Signature of Attorney Date

APPROVED FOR PAYMENT — COURT USE ONLY

23. IN COURT COMP. 24. OUT OF COURT COMP. 25. TRAVEL EXPENSES 26 OTHER EXPENSES 27 TOTAL AMT APPR./CERT.28. SIGNATURE OF THE PRESIDING JUDICIAL OFFICER DATE 28a JUDGE/MAG. JUDGE CODE

29. IN COURT COMP. 30. OUT OF COURT COME. 31. TRAVEL EXPENSES 32. OTHER EXPENSES 33. TOTAL AMT. APPROVED

34. SIGNATURE OF CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF APPEALS (OR DELEGATE) Payment appros’ed DATE 34a JUDGE CODE

in excess ofthe statutory threshold amount.
#### In the Matter of Michael J. Fagan, Appellant, v Marvin L. Colson et al. Respondents.

[856 NYS2d 153]

*878Contrary to the petitioner’s contentions, the findings and conclusions of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Brookhaven (hereinafter the Board) were amply supported by the evidence in the record, and its determination to deny the substantial variances requested by the petitioner was not arbitrary and capricious (see *Matter of Pecoraro v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 2*NY3d 608 [2004]; *Matter of Halperin v City of New Rochelle,*24 AD3d 768 [2005]; *Matter of Tetra Bldrs. v Scheyer,*251 AD2d 589 [1998]; *Matter of Becvar v Scheyer,*250 AD2d 842 [1998]). The Board properly considered and weighed the factors enumerated in Town Law § 267-b (3) (b) (see *Matter of Sasso v Osgood,*86 NY2d 374 [1995]), and its reliance upon the specific, detailed testimony of a neighbor of the petitioner which was based on personal knowledge did not render the determination the product of generalized and conclusory community opposition (see *Matter of Pecoraro v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 2*NY3d 608 [2004]; *Matter of Ifrah v Utschig,*98 NY2d 304 [2002]; *cf. Matter of 450 Sunrise Highway v Town of Oyster Bay,*287 AD2d 714 [2001]; *Matter of Necker Pottick, Fox Run Woods Bldrs. Corp. v Duncan,*251 AD2d 333 [1998]). Similarly, the petitioner failed to present evidence to sustain his burden (see *Matter of Campo Grandchildren Trust v Colson,*39 AD3d 746, 749 [2007]) of demonstrating that the Board’s determination was inconsistent with a prior determination based on “essentially the same facts” *(Matter of North Shore F.C.P., Inc. v Mammina, 22*AD3d 759, 761 [2005]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.P., Dickerson, Belen and Chambers, JJ., concur.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 576

To provide for the transfer to the Secretary of Energy of title to, and 

full responsibility for the possession, transportation, and disposal of, 

radioactive waste associated with the West Valley Demonstration Project, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2003

Mr. HOUGHTON (for himself, Mr. QUINN, and Mr. REYNOLDS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To provide for the transfer to the Secretary of Energy of 

title to, and full responsibility for the possession, transportation, and disposal of, radioactive waste associated 

with the West Valley Demonstration Project, and for 

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER. 

4 Not later than September 30, 2004, in exchange for 

5 payment to the United States of all amounts held by the 

6 New York State Energy Research and Development Au7 thority for the maintenance of radioactive waste solidified 
2

•HR 576 IH 

1 under the West Valley Demonstration Project and referred 

2 to in section 3.05(b) of the cooperative agreement entered 

3 into under section 2(b)(4) of the West Valley Demonstra4 tion Project Act, title to, and full responsibility for the 

5 possession, transportation, disposal, stewardship, mainte6 nance, and monitoring of, all radioactive waste at the 

7 Western New York Service Center in West Valley, New 

8 York, other than the waste disposed of in the State-li9 censed disposal area, shall transfer to the Secretary of En10 ergy.

Æ
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez, United States District Judge for **

the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANASTASIA MAXWELL,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 09-15720

D.C. No. 4:07-cv-05598-CW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Claudia Wilken, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 14, 2010

San Francisco, California

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge and 

MARTINEZ, District Judge.** 

Plaintiff has not shown that the legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons

defendant has offered for any actions it took against her are a pretext for

FILED

MAY 18 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
page 2

discrimination. See, e.g., Surrell v. Cal. Water Serv. Co., 518 F.3d 1097, 1105–07

(9th Cir. 2008); Bradley v. Harcourt, Brace & Co., 104 F.3d 267, 269–71 (9th Cir.

1996). Nor has plaintiff shown that defendant took an adverse action against her

because she engaged in protected activity. See, e.g., Surrell, 518 F.3d at 1107–08. 

And, none of the conduct plaintiff alleges occurred was sufficiently severe or

pervasive to alter the conditions of her employment and create an abusive work

environment. See, e.g., Manatt v. Bank of Am., N.A., 339 F.3d 792, 798, 800–01

(9th Cir. 2003); Kortan v. Cal. Youth Auth., 217 F.3d 1104, 1110–11 (9th Cir.

2000). 

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION


I, Mark Clancy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Hybrid Fuel Systems,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the small
business issuer's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting.


September 8, 2005

                          /s/ Mark Clancy
                          Name: Mark Clancy
                          Title: Chief Executive Officer
                          (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

The certification set forth below is being submitted
in connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Veraz Networks, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350).

Douglas A. Sabella, the Chief Executive Officer, and Albert J. Wood, the Chief Financial Officer of Veraz Networks, Inc., each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 14th day of August, 2009.



|                      |  |        |  |                                                   
|--------------------- |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  | By:    |  | /s/    Douglas A. Sabella                         
|                      |  | Name:  |  | Douglas A. Sabella                                
|                      |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer                           
|                      |  |        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                     
|                      |  |       
|                      |  | By:    |  | /s/    Albert J. Wood                             
|                      |  | Name:  |  | Albert J. Wood                                    
|                      |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer                           
|                      |  |        |  | (Principal Financial and Chief Accounting Officer)

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Veraz Networks, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 139 (Wednesday, July 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 36240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17303]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel. Formative Children's Center Review 
2.
    Date: July 24, 2009.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Washington Plaza Hotel, 10 Thomas Circle, NW., 
Washington, DC 20005.
    Contact Person: Linda K. Bass, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research and Training, Nat. Institute Environmental Health Sciences, 
P. O. Box 12233, MD EC-30, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. (919) 
541-1307. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9bf6faf7f4f5fedbf5f2fef3e8b5f5f2f3b5fcf4ed"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="254844494a4b40654b4c404d560b4b4c4d0b424a53">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, 
Biometry and Risk Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental 
Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety 
Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic 
Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Development 
in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response to 
Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied Toxicological Research 
and Testing, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 14, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-17303 Filed 7-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MEGAN BATYKEFER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 222 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of October, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### Teresa A. Doherty et al., Appellants, v Smithtown Central School District, Respondent.

[854 NYS2d 202]

The injured plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell on water on the floor of the defendant’s premises. The injured plaintiff was looking straight ahead, and she did not see the defect before the accident occurred. After she fell, she saw a four-foot area which was covered with spots of dirty water with footprints in them.

A defendant who moves for summary judgment in a slip-and-*802fall case has the initial burden of making a prima facie showing that it neither created the hazardous condition nor had actual or constructive notice of its existence for a sufficient length of time to discover and remedy it *(see Ames v Waldbaum, Inc.,*34 AD3d 607 [2006]; *Britto v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc.,*21 AD3d 436 [2005]). “To constitute constructive notice, a defect must be visible and apparent and it must exist for a sufficient length of time prior to the accident to permit defendant’s employees to discover and remedy it” *(Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,*67 NY2d 836, 837 [1986]). Only after the defendant has satisfied its threshold burden will the court examine the sufficiency of the plaintiffs opposition *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851 [1985]; *Joachim v 1824 Church Ave., Inc.,*12 AD3d 409 [2004]).

Here, the defendant failed to submit evidence sufficient to establish that it did not have constructive notice of the alleged hazardous condition *(see Cox v Huntington Quadrangle No. 1 Co.,*35 AD3d 523, 524 [2006]; *Ames v Waldbaum, Inc.,*34 AD3d 607 [2006]; *Yioves v T.J. Maxx, Inc.,*29 AD3d 572, 573 [2006]; *Britto v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc.,*21 AD3d at 437). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Rivera, J.P., Ritter, Carni and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 519

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of the San Gabriel River Watershed,

and for other purposes.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 519

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a

study of the San Gabriel River Watershed, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 519 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘San Gabriel River Wa3 tershed Study Act’’.

4 SEC. 2. STUDY OF SAN GABRIEL RIVER WATERSHED.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior

6 (hereafter in this Act referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall

7 conduct a special resource study of the following areas:

8 (1) The San Gabriel River and its tributaries

9 north of and including the city of Santa Fe Springs.

10 (2) The San Gabriel Mountains within the ter11 ritory of the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles

12 Rivers and Mountains Conservancy (as defined in

13 section 32603(c)(1)(C) of the State of California

14 Public Resource Code).

15 (b) STUDY CONDUCT AND COMPLETION.—Section

16 8(c) of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)) shall

17 apply to the conduct and completion of the study con18 ducted under this section.

19 (c) CONSULTATION WITH FEDERAL, STATE, AND

20 LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.—In conducting the study under

21 this section, the Secretary shall consult with the San Ga22 briel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Con23 servancy and other appropriate Federal, State, and local

24 governmental entities.

25 (d) CONSIDERATIONS.—In conducting the study

26 under this section, the Secretary shall consider regional
3

•HR 519 EH

1 flood control and drainage needs and publicly owned infra2 structure such as wastewater treatment facilities.

3 SEC. 3. REPORT.

4 Not later than 3 years after funds are made available

5 for this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee

6 on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the

7 Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives

8 a report on the findings, conclusions, and recommenda9 tions of the study.

Passed the House of Representatives March 19,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.