____________________________________

: 

OREXO AB., : UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 : DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Plaintiff(s), :

: Civil Action No. 11-3788(FLW)

-vs- : ARB: Yes___ No X

:

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, :

INC., ET AL. : ORDER SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

:

Defendant(s). :

____________________________________: 

IT IS on this 28 Day of November, 2011; TH

ORDERED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, that a scheduling conference be

held before the Honorable Lois H. Goodman, on January 31 , 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in st

Court room 7 East at the United States Courthouse, Trenton, New Jersey, and it is

further

ORDERED that (1) prior to the above conference, all counsel and individuals

who are appearing on their own behalf (or “pro se”) confer on a joint discovery plan (see

L.Civ.R. 26.1(b)); (2) the joint discovery plan, as well as any disputes regarding it, be

submitted to the undersigned no later than one week prior to the above conference (see

L.Civ.R. 26.1(b)); the joint discovery plan should NOT be electronically filed, but may be

submitted to Chambers via regular mail, facsimile [(609) 989-2193], or e-mail

[lhg_orders@njd.uscourts.gov]; (3) at the above conference, all parties not appearing pro se

shall be represented by counsel with full authority to speak for their clients in all pretrial

matters (see L.Civ.R. 16.1(a)); (4) Plaintiff(s) notify any party who hereafter enters an

appearance for the above conference and forward to that party a copy hereof; and (5) the

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW -LHG Document 31 Filed 11/28/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 103
parties are to advise the Honorable Lois H. Goodman immediately if this action has been

settled or terminated, so that the above conference may be cancelled. 

Furthermore, counsel and litigants are advised that, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26,

30, and 33, early disclosure requirements and limitations on depositions and interrogatories

will be enforced; therefore, counsel shall exchange the following information without formal

discovery requests:

(i) identities of individuals with knowledge of facts that support your

claims or defenses;

(ii) A copy of, or description by category and location of, documents and

things in the possession of counsel or the parties regarding the disputed

issues;

(iii) insurance agreements in force; and

(iv) statement of the basis for any damages claimed;

and it is further

ORDERED that the meeting of parties required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f) shall take

place no later than two weeks prior to the date of the initial conference; and it is further

ORDERED that upon the entry of appearance of any new and/or additional counsel

subsequent to the date of this Order, Plaintiff’s counsel shall send a copy of this Scheduling

Order to the newly appearing attorney(s), but on any third party claim, the counsel for the

third party plaintiff shall send a copy of this Order to the newly entering counsel for third

party defendant(s); and it is further

ORDERED that all parties shall confer and submit a Joint Discovery Plan to the

Magistrate Judge not less than one week prior to the above-stated conference date, as

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW -LHG Document 31 Filed 11/28/11 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 104
required by L.Civ.R. 26.1(b) of this Court. The conference date should appear on the

caption of the Joint Discovery Plan, which shall include, at a minimum, the following items:

(1) a brief statement of the facts underpinning the claims or defenses in the action, as well

as a brief statement of the legal issues in the case; (2) a description of all discovery

conducted by the parties to date; (3) a description of all discovery problems encountered to

date, the efforts undertaken by the parties to remedy these problems, and the parties’

suggested resolution of the problems; (4) a description of the parties’ further discovery

needs; (5) the parties’ estimate of the time needed to complete discovery; (6) a statement

regarding whether expert testimony will be necessary, and the parties’ anticipated schedule

for retention of experts and submission of their reports; (7) a statement regarding whether

there should be any limitation placed upon use of any discovery device and, if so, the

reasons the limitation is sought; (8) a description of any special discovery needs of the

parties (e.g., videotape, telephone depositions, or problems with out-of-state witnesses or

documents, or discovery of digital information) (see L.Civ.R. 26(d)); and it is further

ORDERED that in all patent cases where the parties cannot agree on a proposed

schedule, the Court will apply the scheduling provisions set forth in the Local Patent Rules

(see generally L.Civ.R. 9.3).

Sanctions may be imposed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(f) if Counsel or a pro se

litigant either fails to appear at the conference or appears unprepared. Each attendant at 

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW -LHG Document 31 Filed 11/28/11 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 105
the conference shall be fully familiar with the file, and have full authority to bind his or her

clients in all pretrial matters. 

 s/ Lois H. Goodman 

HONORABLE LOIS H. GOODMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW -LHG Document 31 Filed 11/28/11 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 106
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 Mediation is the Alternative Dispute Resolution ( “ADR” ) program in this Court. 

Mediation is governed by Local Civil Rule 301.1. The mediation program under this rule is

supervised by a judicial officer (at present United States Magistrate Judge Madeline Cox Arleo)

who is available to answer any questions about the program.

 Any district judge or magistrate judge may refer a civil action to mediation. This may be

done without the consent of the parties. However, the Court encourages parties to confer among

themselves and consent to mediation. Moreover, you are reminded that when counsel confer

pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26.1, one of the

topics that must be addressed is the eligibility of a civil action for participation in ADR.

 A civil action may be referred to mediation at any time. However, one of the advantages

of mediation is that, if successful, it enables parties to avoid the time and expense of discovery and

trial. Accordingly, the Court encourages parties to consent to mediation prior to or at the time that

automatic disclosures are made pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

 If parties consent to mediation, they may choose a mediator either from the list of

certified mediators maintained by the Court or by the selection of a private mediator. If a civil

action is referred to mediation without consent of the parties, the judicial officer responsible for

supervision of the program will select the mediator.

 Mediation is non-judgmental. The role of the mediator is to assist the parties in reaching

a resolution of their dispute. The parties may confer with the mediator on an ex parte basis. 

Anything said to the mediator will be deemed to be confidential and will not be revealed to another

party or to others without the party’s consent. The mediator’s hourly rate is $300.00, which is

borne equally by the parties.

 If you would like further information with regard to the mediation program please visit

the Court’s web site www.njd.uscourts.gov and review the Guidelines for Mediation, Appendix Q

to the Local Civil Rules. You may also make inquiries of the judicial officer responsible for

supervision of the program.

 Civil actions in which there are pro se parties (incarcerated or not) are not eligible for

mediation. DNJ-Med-001 (10/1/10)

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW -LHG Document 31 Filed 11/28/11 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 107