alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



                  Certification of Principal Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blugrass Energy, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-Q  for the  quarter  ended  December  31,  2008 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Leslie
A. Schaefer,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Leslie A. Schaefer
Leslie A. Schaefer
Chief Financial Officer
February 20, 2009

      This certification  accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  and  shall  not be  deemed  to be  incorporated  by
reference into any filing under the  Securities Act of 1933, as amended,  or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (09-068)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee.

# DATES:

Wednesday, August 5, 2009, 8 a.m.-12 noon (EDT).

# ADDRESSES:

Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1530 P Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005,  Telephone: (202) 939-1138.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Philip R. McAlister, Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546. Phone 202-358-0712.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room. It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. The agenda topics for the meeting include:
    - Vision for Space Exploration Background.
    - Mars Society Views on U.S. Human Space Flight Program.
    - Science-related Briefings.
    - Arianespace Briefing.
    - Public Comment.

P. Diane Rausch,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-17305 Filed 7-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### UNITED STATES of America v. PARAFFIN WAX, 2255 BAGS. Karl BURGI and Anna Nee Tobler, doing business as K. Burgi-Tobler & Company, Third Party Plaintiff, v. BAIRD CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Third Party Defendant.

Misc. No. 1977.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

March 6, 1959.

See also 141 F.Supp. 402.

Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City, for third party plaintiff, Sheldon A. Vogel, New York City, of counsel.

*290Benjamin, Galton *&*Robbins, New York City, for third party defendant, David E. Schwab, II, New York City, of counsel.

BRUCHHAUSEN, District Judge.

The third party plaintiff, K. Burgi-Tobler & Company, moves for the issuance of letters rogatory, pursuant to Rule 28(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., directed to the appropriate Court in Switzerland, requesting the examination of Karl Burgi, an associate of the said Company, and Hans Schulthiss, a former employee, on written interrogatories and cross-interrogatories.

The movant desires to obtain this evidence for use at the trial, thus avoiding the attendance of the witnesses, one of whom is claimed to be of advanced age and in poor health and the other, not within the movant’s control and direction, and also avoiding expense.

The third party defendant opposes an examination by interrogatories for the reason that it will thereby be deprived of the opportunity of cross-examining important witnesses on crucial elements of the case. Its plea is for a denial of the motion or in the alternative that this Court direct issuance of letters rogatory to the appropriate Court in Switzerland with a request for permission to orally examine and cross-examine the witnesses.

Rule 28 of the said rules authorizes this Court to issue commissions or letters rogatory in connection with obtaining evidence in a foreign country. See also Yol. 4, Moore’s Federal Practice, Second Edition, pages 1907-1921 and Vol. 3, Benedict on Admiralty, Sixth Edition, Section 400. In general, a commission may be resorted to where the law of the particular foreign country permits the taking of the testimony in accordance with the law of the jurisdiction from which it emanates, whereas the procedure for the taking of testimony under letters rogatory is governed by the law of the foreign country wherein the prospective witnesses reside.

The movant has submitted a letter from the United States Department of State, dated September 19, 1957, setting forth the procedure in effect in Switzerland. It seems that the testimony of witnesses residing therein, for use in another country, may only be taken by interrogatories, forwarded to the appropriate Swiss Court through diplomatic channels. This is the relief requested by the movant.

The motion is granted.

Settle order on notice.
Exhibit No. 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report of Juhl Wind, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the undersigned’s knowledge:





(1)   the Report of the Company filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  August 14, 2012

/s/ John P. MitolaJohn P. Mitola

President
Case 2:11-cv-00712-CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/08/11 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1
Case 2:11-cv-00712-CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/08/11 Page 2 of 16 PageID: 2
Case 2:11-cv-00712-CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/08/11 Page 3 of 16 PageID: 3
Case 2:11-cv-00712-CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/08/11 Page 4 of 16 PageID: 4
Case 2:11-cv-00712-CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/08/11 Page 5 of 16 PageID: 5
Case 2:11-cv-00712-CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/08/11 Page 6 of 16 PageID: 6
Case 2:11-cv-00712-CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/08/11 Page 7 of 16 PageID: 7
Case 2:11-cv-00712-CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/08/11 Page 8 of 16 PageID: 8
Case 2:11-cv-00712-CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/08/11 Page 9 of 16 PageID: 9
Case 2:11-cv-00712-CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/08/11 Page 10 of 16 PageID: 10
Case 2:11-cv-00712-CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/08/11 Page 11 of 16 PageID: 11
Case 2:11-cv-00712-CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/08/11 Page 12 of 16 PageID: 12
Case 2:11-cv-00712-CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/08/11 Page 13 of 16 PageID: 13
Case 2:11-cv-00712-CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/08/11 Page 14 of 16 PageID: 14
Case 2:11-cv-00712-CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/08/11 Page 15 of 16 PageID: 15
Case 2:11-cv-00712-CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/08/11 Page 16 of 16 PageID: 16
CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Dialex Minerals Inc. (the
Company) for the year ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report),  I,  Alexander G. Stewart,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to
the best of his/her knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: April 15, 2004

By:                      /s/ Alexander G. Stewart
                          ----------------------------------
                             Alexander G. Stewart
                             Chief Executive Officer


This  certification   accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Motion for Rehearing Granted; Order filed November 27, 2012. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00941-CV

____________

HECTOR GAINES BARKLEY, III, Appellant

V.

TEXAS WINDSTORM INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 122nd District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-CV-3087A

ORDER

On September 11, 2012, this court issued an opinion dismissing this appeal. On, 

October 10, 2012, appellant filed a motion for rehearing. The motion is GRANTED. 

This court’s opinion filed September 11, 2012, is WITHDRAWN, and our 

judgment of that date is VACATED. The appeal is ordered REINSTATED. 

Appellant’s brief is due 30 days from the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and Jamison.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 542 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 542

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To repeal the reservation of mineral rights made by the United States 
 when certain lands in Livingston Parish, Louisiana, were conveyed by 
                          Public Law 102-562.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 542

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To repeal the reservation of mineral rights made by the United States 
 when certain lands in Livingston Parish, Louisiana, were conveyed by 
                          Public Law 102-562.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF RESERVATION OF MINERAL RIGHTS, LIVINGSTON PARISH, 
              LOUISIANA.

    Section 102 of Public Law 102-562 (106 Stat. 4234) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a) In General.--'';
            (2) by striking ``and subject to the reservation in 
        subsection (b),''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (b).

SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF AMENDMENT.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall execute the legal instruments 
necessary to effectuate the amendment made by subsection (a)(3) of 
section 1.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 20, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of the amended Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A for the Quarter Ended October 31, 2002 (the "Report") by Forgent
Networks, Inc. ("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Registrant.


                                              /s/ RICHARD N. SNYDER
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Richard N. Snyder
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              May 29, 2003


                                              /s/ JAY C. PETERSON
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Jay C. Peterson
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              May 29, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metals USA Holdings Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
(the Periodic Report), I, C. Lourenço Gonçalves, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. To my knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                              |  |                                                            
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 3, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    C. LOURENÇO
GONÇALVES
|                        |  |  |  |                              |  | C. Lourenço Gonçalves President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# cpsaat11b
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Criminal No. 11-cr-470 (SDW)

:

:

v. : ORDER

:

ANDREW AUERNHEIMER, :

: October 26, 2012

:

Defendant. :

:

WIGENTON, District Judge.

This matter, having come before the Court on Defendant Andrew Auernheimer’s

(“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss the Superseding Indictment, and this Court, having carefully 

reviewed and considered the submissions and arguments of the parties, for the reasons stated in 

this Court’s Opinion dated October 26, 2012, 

IT IS on this 26th day of October, 2012,

ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is DENIED.

_ s/Susan D. Wigenton, U.S.D.J.

Susan D. Wigenton, U.S.D.J.
Exhibit 32.1





EXTERRAN PARTNERS, L.P.


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Exterran Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Ernie L. Danner, as Chief Executive Officer of Exterran GP LLC, the general partner of the Partnership’s general partner, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





/s/ ERNIE L. DANNER


Ernie L. Danner


Chief Executive Officer, Exterran GP LLC


As General Partner of Exterran General Partner, L.P.


As General Partner of Exterran Partners, L.P.





May 6, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# cpsaat22
NOTE: Data are for weekdays (Monday-Friday) only and refer to employed persons ages 25 to 54 who worked on the diary day and 

lived in households with children under 18. All categories, except sleeping and working, include related travel time. Data are 2006 

annual averages.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Chart 6-9. On weekdays that they worked, employed persons 

with children spent two-thirds of an average day working and 

sleeping

Sleeping

7.6 hours

Working

8.2 hours

Household 

activities

1.0 hours

Leisure

and sports

2.6 hours

Eating and drinking

1.1 hours

Other

2.4 hours

Caring for others

1.1 hours

Total = 24 hours

2006

Chart 6-9. On weekdays that they worked, employed persons 

with children spent two-thirds of an average day working and 

sleeping

• On an average work day (Monday-Friday) in 2006, employed persons ages 25 

to 54 with children in the household worked about one-third (8.2 hours) of the 

day. No other single activity was allocated as much time.

• This same group slept 7.6 hours on weekdays that they worked—0.7 hour less 

than the average for workers 15 years and older. The remainder of the day 

was spent doing a variety of activities, including leisure and sports (2.6 hours); 

caring for others (1.1 hours); eating and drinking (1.1 hours); household 

activities such as housework, food preparation, and household management 

(1.0 hours); and other miscellaneous activities.

• Of the 1.1 hours spent per day caring for others, about an hour was spent 

providing care to children (household and non-household) under the age of 18 

as a primary activity. Primary childcare activities include bathing, dressing, 

reading to, and playing with children.
# THEATTORNEYGENERAL OF TEXAS

June 26, 1975
The Honorable Bill McCoy Ector County Attorney Ector County Courthouse Odessa, Texas 79761 Opinion No. H- 636 Re: Whether a county may expend money from its general fundfor construction,,of a drainage ditch. Dear Mr. McCoy:

You have requested our opinion concerning whether arounty~may expend money from its geIiera1 fund for construction ofadrainage ditch; You explain that the Commissioners Court of Ector County has voted to enter anagreement with the City ofOdessa whereby the county ~wouldcontribute tothe construction ofa drainage ditch. You further note that Ector County has noFlood Control Fund. Article 1581e, section 3. V. T. C.S., provides inpart: The Commissioners Court ofany county inthis State may contract and agree with any other county, political subdivision, governmental unit, or municipal corporation for the joint acquisition of right-of-ways, orjoint construction or maintenance of canals, drains, levees and other improvements for flood control, and drainage as related to flooa control, and for making necessary outlets, and maintaining them. The proposed contract is therefore authorized by law and is avalid expenditure of county funds. InBexar County v. Mann, 157 S.W. 2d 134,136 (Tex. Sup. 1941). the Texas Supreme~ Court stated:

All county expenditures lawfully authorized to be made by a county must be paid out ofthe county’s general fund unless there is some law which makes them acharge against a special fund. Since we are aware ofno special fund from which this expenditure is required to be made, inour opinion itis tobe made from the county’s general fund. SUMMARY

Where a county has no special fund from which
p. 2883The Honorable Bill McCoy - Page 2
expenditures for drainage ditches must be made, itmay finance acontract for the construction of such ditches with money from its general fund.

Attorney General of Texas -PROVED:

jad

p. 2884