alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Hon. Dennis M. Cavanaugh
v. : Crim. No. 11-459
BLAS ERNERS ESPINAL-CABRERA, : ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE

a/k/a “Hermano”

This matter having come before the Court on the joint
application of Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the
District of New Jersey (by Mary E. Toscano, Special Assistant
U.S. Attorney), and defendant BLAS ERNERS ESPINAL-CABRERA (by
Patrick J. Brackley), for an order granting a continuance of the
proceedings in the above-captioned matter, and the defendant
being aware that he has the right to have the matter brought to
trial within 70 days of the date of his appearance before a
judicial officer of this court pursuant to Title 18 of the United
States Code, Section 3161(c) (1), and as the defendant has
consented to such a continuance, and for good and sufficient
cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should
be continued for the following reasons:

(1) The parties request an opportunity for sufficient
time to review the evidence and engage in plea negotiations,
which would render any subsequent trial of this matter

unnecessary;


(2) Taking into account the exercise of diligence,
therefore, the facts of this case require that defense counsel be
permitted a reasonable amount of additional time to review the
evidence with the defendant, and should plea negotiations fail
time for effective trial preparation in this matter.

(3) As a result of the foregoing, pursuant to Title 18,
United States Code, Section 3161(h) (7), the ends of justice
served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interest of
the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS, therefore, on this 20 day of November, 2011,

ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, continued
for a period of 60 days from November 29, 2011 to January 28,
2012; and it is further

ORDERED that the period from November 29, 2011 through

January 28, 2012 shall be excludable in computing time under the

VU TE,

HON. DENNIS M. CAVANAUG
United States Distric. US oe

Speedy Trial Act of 1974.



Form and entry
consented to:

Mary E.” Toscano
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

hice L Syracnloy

Patrick J. Brackley

Counsel for defendant BLAS ERNERS ESPINAL-CABRERA
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5360 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5360

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To authorize grants to establish academies for teachers and students of 
          American history and civics, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American History and Civics 
Education Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. PRESIDENTIAL ACADEMIES FOR TEACHING OF AMERICAN HISTORY AND 
              CIVICS; CONGRESSIONAL ACADEMIES FOR STUDENTS OF AMERICAN 
              HISTORY AND CIVICS.

    (a) Establishment.--The Secretary of Education (referred to in this 
Act as the ``Secretary'') may award not more than 12 grants, on a 
competitive basis--
        (1) to entities to establish Presidential Academies for 
    Teaching of American History and Civics that may offer workshops 
    for both veteran and new teachers of American history and civics; 
    and
        (2) to entities to establish Congressional Academies for 
    Students of American History and Civics.
    (b) Application.--An entity that desires to receive a grant under 
subsection (a) shall submit an application to the Secretary at such 
time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary 
may require.
    (c) Demonstrated Expertise.--The Secretary shall require that each 
entity, to be eligible to receive a grant under this section, 
demonstrate expertise in historical methodology or the teaching of 
history.
    (d) Available Funds.--To carry out this section, the Secretary may 
use any funds appropriated for fiscal year 2005 or any subsequent 
fiscal year to carry out part D of title V of the Elementary and 
Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7241 et seq.).

SEC. 3. NATIONAL HISTORY DAY PROGRAM.

    The Secretary may award grants to the National History Day Program 
for the purpose of continuing and expanding its activities to promote 
the study of history and improve instruction.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
S05O1591.

#### VAN DETTA v. BOARD TO DETERMINE CHARACTER AND FITNESS OF BAR APPLICANTS.

(625 SE2d 752)

Decided January 17, 2006.

Gina Van Detta, *pro se.*

*Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Rebecca S. Mick, Kristin L. Miller, Assistant Attorneys General, HulettH. Askew, Director, Office of Bar Admissions,*for Fitness Board.

Per curiam.

In May 2005, the Board to Determine Character and Fitness of Bar Applicants (hereinafter “Fitness Board”), tentatively denied certification of fitness to practice law to bar applicant Gina Van Detta. See Rules Governing Admission to the Practice of Law, Pt. A. After Van Detta filed an answer and the Fitness Board requested appointment of a hearing officer, this Court appointed a hearing officer on June 7, 2005. See Rules Governing Admission to the Practice of Law, Pt. A, Sec. 8 (a). Prior to a hearing, Van Detta filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in this Court on June 15, 2005, seeking an order requiring the Fitness Board to withdraw its tentative denial of certification or, in the alternative, to clarify and alter the specifications included in the tentative denial of certification. Subsequent to answering the petition, the Fitness Board filed a motion to dismiss the petition on several grounds, including that Van Detta has legal remedies available to her.

The writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy available in limited circumstances to compel action by a public officer when there is no other adequate legal remedy. *Ford Motor Co. v. Lawrence,*279 Ga. 284, 285 (612 SE2d 301) (2005). The availability *of*an administrative process through which redress may be sought constitutes an adequate legal remedy the existence of which warrants the denial of mandamus relief. *Thomas v. Madison County Bd. of Commrs.,*261 Ga. 265, 266 (404 SE2d 271) (1991). The process which is presently underway provides Van Detta an adequate legal remedy in the form of a hearing before a hearing officer, a final decision by the Fitness Board, and an appeal to this Court in the event of an undesirable result. See Rules Governing Admission to the Practice of Law, Pt. A, Sec. 8; and Pt. F, Sec. 7. That being so, Van Detta is not entitled to a writ of mandamus. *Thomas v. Madison County Bd. of Commrs.,*supra.

*Writ denied.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Baoshinn Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending March 31, 2013, I, Sean Webster, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2013, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2013, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 20, 2013

Baoshinn Corporation



By:  /s/ Sean Wester

Sean Webster
Case 2:11-mj-08143-MCA Document 1 Filed 07/14/11 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 1
Case 2:11-mj-08143-MCA Document 1 Filed 07/14/11 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 2
Case 2:11-mj-08143-MCA Document 1 Filed 07/14/11 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 3
Case 2:11-mj-08143-MCA Document 1 Filed 07/14/11 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 4
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00066-CR

Juan Orozco, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 5 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C1CR96 454-713

HONORABLE NANCY WRIGHT HOHENGARTEN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

We grant appellant Juan Orozco’s motion to dismiss his appeal. See Tex. R. App.

P. 42.2(a). The appeal is dismissed.

_____________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: April 23, 2008

Do Not Publish
76

Table 31. Job-related work at home on primary job: All workers by marital status, presence and age 

(Numbers in thousands)

Total, 16 years and over.................. 136,602 20,673 15.1 16.2 49.3 33.7

Married, spouse present............ 77,243 14,623 18.9 16.4 48.1 34.6

Not married.............................. 59,359 6,050 10.2 15.7 52.2 31.5

Never married..................... 36,857 3,087 8.4 17.7 58.1 23.2

Other marital status............... 22,502 2,963 13.2 13.6 46.1 40.2

With own children under 18......... 50,011 8,584 17.2 17.4 47.5 34.0

 With own children under 6... 21,373 3,599 16.8 19.2 47.3 32.8

With no own children under 18...... 86,591 12,090 14.0 15.4 50.5 33.4

Total, 16 years and over.................. 64,185 9,893 15.4 17.8 51.4 29.4

Married, spouse present............ 33,750 6,509 19.3 18.2 48.8 31.4

Not married................................ 30,435 3,384 11.1 17.1 56.5 25.5

Never married..................... 16,754 1,522 9.1 19.2 66.2 12.7

Other marital status............... 13,681 1,862 13.6 15.3 48.6 35.9

With own children under 18......... 24,108 4,051 16.8 19.9 46.6 31.5

 With own children under 6... 9,331 1,614 17.3 23.4 42.6 32.6

With no own children under 18...... 40,077 5,842 14.6 16.3 54.8 27.9

Total, 16 years and over.................. 72,417 10,780 14.9 14.7 47.3 37.6

Married, spouse present............ 43,493 8,114 18.7 15.0 47.5 37.1

Not married................................ 28,924 2,666 9.2 13.9 46.8 39.1

Never married..................... 20,104 1,565 7.8 16.2 50.3 33.3

Other marital status............... 8,820 1,101 12.5 10.5 41.8 47.4

With own children under 18.......... 25,903 4,533 17.5 15.1 48.4 36.3

 With own children under 6... 12,042 1,986 16.5 15.8 51.0 33.0

With no own children under 18...... 46,514 6,247 13.4 14.5 46.5 38.6

Unpaid

Total

Women

Men

of children, sex, and pay status, May 2004

Characteristic Total

employed 3

Persons who usually worked at home 1

Total Rate

Percent distribution by class of worker 2

Wage and salary Selfemployed 4

Paid

1 Persons who usually work at home are defined as

those who work at home at least once per week as part

of their primary job. 2 Unpaid family workers and wage and salary workers

who did not report pay status are included in total but not

shown separately. 3 Includes persons who did not provide information on

work at home. 

4 Includes both the incorporated and unincorporated

self-employed.

NOTE: Data refer to employed persons in

nonagricultural industries. Own children include sons,

daughters, stepchildren, and adopted children. Not

included are nieces, nephews, grandchildren, and other

related and unrelated children.

SOURCE: May 2004 Work at Home supplement to

the Current Population Survey, U.S. Department of

Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

76
Amended and Restated Exhibit A to the Investment Management Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.15 
 EXHIBIT A 
 FEE SCHEDULE 

AMENDED AND RESTATED as of January 1, 2013 
 This Amended and Restated Exhibit A is effective as of January 1, 2013, and is attached to and made a part of the Investment Management Agreement between Stateco Financial Services, Inc.
(“Stateco”) and State Auto Insurance Company of Wisconsin (formerly Midwest Security Insurance Company) effective January 1, 1997. 
 Agreement 
 Except as amended or modified by mutual
agreement of the parties hereto, Stateco shall be paid an investment management fee every quarter based on a percentage of the average asset value of invested assets which average shall be calculated by adding the market value of invested assets at
the beginning of the quarter and at the end of the quarter, dividing that sum by two. The fee will be paid within forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar quarter. 

The annual fee for fixed instruments including bonds (taxable and tax-free), invested cash and preferred stock is 20
basis points or .002 times the average asset value of that category of invested asset. 
 The annual fee for all
common stock portfolios is 50 basis points or .005 times the average asset value of that category of invested assets. 
 In addition, as respects the common stock portfolios, Stateco shall be entitled to a performance bonus based on the performance of the common stock portfolios determined in the following manner.

 In the event the total return on any common stock portfolio exceeds for a particular quarter the total return
for the S&P 500 for the same quarter, Stateco shall be paid an annual bonus of 10 basis points or .001 times the portion of the average asset value of the particular portfolio which exceeds the asset value of the same portfolio calculated based
on the actual total performance of the S&P 500 for the quarter in question. 
  

			
	 STATECO FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

		
	By: 	 	 /s/ Robert P. Restrepo, Jr.

		 	 President

		 	
	STATE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY of WISCONSIN
		
	By: 	 	 /s/ Robert P. Restrepo, Jr.

		 	 President


 Agreemen/Investment Management-SAWI Fee Schedule 1-1-13
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0521]

# AGENCY:

 Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

 The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Guidance for Clinical Trial Sponsors: Establishment and Operation of Clinical Trial Data Monitoring Committees” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3794.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of March 10, 2009 (74 FR 10253), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and                           ( print page 36229)                        clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0581. The approval expires on June 30, 2012. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain*.                

Dated: July 15, 2009.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.

[FR Doc. E9-17330 Filed 7-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
Exhibit 21.1
 Blackboard Inc. Subsidiaries
 Entity
    
    State/Country of FormationBlackboard Tennessee, LLC
    
    DelawareBb Acquisition Corp.
    
    DelawareBlackboard International Holdings Inc.
    
    DelawareBb Management Co. LLC
    
    DelawareBlackboard CampusWide of Texas, Inc.
    
    TexasBlackboard International LP
    
    BermudaBlackboard International B.V.
    
    NetherlandsBlackboard Japan KK
    
    JapanBlackboard (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaBlackboard (UK) Limited
    
    United KingdomBlackboard Educational (Canada) Corporation
    
    CanadaBlackboard (Australia) Pty Ltd.
    
    AustraliaCerbibo Holding Co., Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsXythos Software, Inc.
    
    DelawareXythos Czech s.r.o.
    
    Czech RepublicBlackboard Connect Inc.
    
    DelawareNotification Technologies, Inc.
    
    DelawareBlackboard Singapore Pty Limited
    
    SingaporeCERNET-Blackboard Information Technology
(Beijing) Co., Ltd
    
    ChinaANGEL Learning, Inc.
    
    Indiana
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-11266

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BOBBY LEWIS LEINBAUGH,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:00-CR-36-1-C

--------------------

April 12, 2001

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Bobby Lewis Leinbaugh appeals the 151-month sentence imposed

following his plea of guilty to a charge of possession of a

firearm by a felon, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He

contends that the prior violent felony convictions that subjected

him to an enhanced sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) were

elements of the offense that should have been charged in the

indictment.

Leinbaugh acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United
No. 00-11266

-2-

States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue

for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v.

New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000). 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at ___, 120 S. Ct. at 2362; United States v. Dabeit, 231

F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), petition for cert. filed, (U.S.

Jan. 26, 2001)(No. 00-8299). Leinbaugh’s argument is foreclosed. 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
CL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0136

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

NEEGE R. NELSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for an 8-day extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and

including October 31, 2022, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 14 2022

10/14/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0136
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5381 

For the relief of Griselda Lopez Negrete. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2004 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Griselda Lopez Negrete. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR GRISELDA 

4 LOPEZ NEGRETE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Griselda Lopez Negrete shall be eligible for issuance 

8 of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that 

9 of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 

10 upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant 

11 visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of 

12 status to lawful permanent resident. 
2 

•HR 5381 IH 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Griselda Lopez 

2 Negrete enters the United States before the filing deadline 

3 specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have 

4 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi5 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 

6 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 

7 the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Griselda Lopez Negrete, the Secretary of State 

16 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 

17 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 

18 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIALOF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 
3 

•HR 5381 IH 

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Griselda Lopez Negrete 

2 shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 

3 right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Na4 tionality Act. 

Æ
Case 3:10-cr-00398-PGS Document 48 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 236