alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 1 of 24 PageID: 6
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 2 of 24 PageID: 7
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 3 of 24 PageID: 8
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 4 of 24 PageID: 9
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 5 of 24 PageID: 10
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 6 of 24 PageID: 11
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 7 of 24 PageID: 12
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 8 of 24 PageID: 13
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 9 of 24 PageID: 14
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 10 of 24 PageID: 15
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 11 of 24 PageID: 16
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 12 of 24 PageID: 17
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 13 of 24 PageID: 18
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 14 of 24 PageID: 19
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 15 of 24 PageID: 20
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 16 of 24 PageID: 21
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 17 of 24 PageID: 22
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 18 of 24 PageID: 23
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 19 of 24 PageID: 24
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 20 of 24 PageID: 25
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 21 of 24 PageID: 26
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 22 of 24 PageID: 27
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 23 of 24 PageID: 28
Case 2:11-cv-03354-SRC-MAS Document 1-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 24 of 24 PageID: 29
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 555

To suspend temporarily the duty on tantalum capacitor ink. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2003

Mr. DEMINT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on tantalum capacitor ink.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TANTALUM CAPACITOR INK. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 
2

•HR 555 IH 

‘‘ 9902.34.10 Tantalum capacitor ink: Graphite 

Ink P7300 of 

85% butyl acetate, 8% graphite, and the remaining balance 

of non-hazardous 

resins; and 

Graphite Paste 

P5900 of 92–

96% water, 1–

3% graphite 

(CAS No. 7782–

42–5), 0.5–2% 

ammonia (CAS 

No. 7664–41–7), 

and <1% acrylic 

resin (CAS No. 

9003–32–1) 

(provided for in 

subheading 

3207.30.00) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2005 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
### O pinion issued October 15, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The



## First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 13

- 002 25

- CV

IN RE TRAVELERS LLOYDS OF TEXAS INSURANCE COMPANY , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

By petition for writ of mandamus, relator, Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance

Company , seeks mandamus relief from the trial court’s February 22, 2013 order denying

summary judgment.

We lift the stay previously ordered by this Court and DENY the petition for writ of

mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle

.

1 The underlying case is Samuel Guerra, et al v. Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company

, No. 2009

- 33090 in the 11th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Hon. Mike Miller

presiding.
PINNP 2012.12.30 EX 10.41






Exhibit  10.41








Peak Holdings LLC
399 Jefferson Road
Parsippany, New Jersey 07054
March 4, 2013
Team Member: 


In light of recent performance of Peak Holdings LLC (the “Company”), the board of directors of the Company has decided to modify the vesting terms applicable to certain Class B Units currently held by you.  The changes are intended to increase the likelihood that the Internal Rate of Return target with respect to your Class B Units will be satisfied.  This increases the likelihood that you will become vested in these Class B Units.  In addition, the Company is asking you to waive the EBITDA-based vesting triggers applicable to your Class B-2 Units (in which case such Class B-2 Units will only be eligible to vest as a result of the Internal Rate of Return targets). 


Capitalized terms used but not defined in this letter shall have the meanings ascribed such terms in the Management Unit Subscription Agreement pursuant to which any Class B Unit was granted to you (each, as amended from time to time, a “Subscription Agreement”).


1.    Effective immediately, Schedule I to each Subscription Agreement shall hereby be amended to replace all references to a “20% annual Internal Rate of Return” with “12% annual Internal Rate of Return”. 


2.    Effective immediately, all performance-based vesting conditions based on the achievement of Target EBITDA or Cumulative Target EBITDA amounts are hereby removed and any right to vesting of Class B-2 Units based on the achievement of EBITDA amounts are hereby waived by you. Any unvested Class B-2 Units previously eligible to vest based on the achievement of Target EBITDA or Cumulative Target EBITDA amounts will remain outstanding and eligible to vest based solely on the achievement of the Internal Rate of Return targets set forth in your Subscription Agreement applicable to such Class B-2 Units (as revised pursuant to this letter). 


Except as is provided in this letter, each Subscription Agreement shall remain unchanged and continue in full force and effect. 


Please indicate your agreement to the changes set forth above in the space provided for your signature below.  




	
		
	By:
	/s/ M. Kelley Maggs

	Name:
	M. Kelley Maggs

	Its:
	Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel

















Agreed to this 4th day of March, 2013


	
		
	By:
	 

	Name:
	 

	Its:
V.

ORDER

THOMAS FREEMAN

The financial inability of the defendant to retain counsel

having been established by the Court, and the defendant not having

waived the appointment of counsel.

It is on this l6tl day of December 2015,

0 R D E R E D that Federal Public Defender

Brian Reilly, AFPD for the District of New Jersey, is hereby

appointed to represent said defendant in this cause until further

order of the Court.

PETER G. SHERIDAN, U.S.D.J.

cc: Petitioner

Federal Public Defender
Case 2:10-cv-03984-FSH -PS   Document 31    Filed 10/01/10   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 542

Case 2:10-cv-03984-FSH -PS   Document 31    Filed 10/01/10   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 543
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, the undersigned, Richard N. Snyder, Chief Executive Officer, of Forgent Networks, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:



| | 1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended April 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ RICHARD N. SNYDERRichard N. SnyderChief Executive OfficerJune 14, 2005
Exhibit 99.1



Certification Of Chief Executive Officer And Chief Financial
Officer



I, Andrew G. Raguskus, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Sonic Innovations, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sonic Innovations, Inc.





|By:    |  | /s/     Andrew G. Raguskus           
|------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Name:  |  | Andrew G. Raguskus                   
|Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer





I, Stephen L. Wilson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Sonic Innovations, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sonic Innovations, Inc.





|By:    |  | /s/     Stephen L. Wilson                                      
|------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Name:  |  | Stephen L. Wilson                                              
|Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ThermoEnergy Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dennis C. Cossey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

/s/ Dennis C. Cossey
--------------------------------
Dennis C. Cossey
Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying  Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Grace 4,
Inc. (the  "Company") for the quarter  ending  February 28, 2007, I, Virginia K.
Sourlis,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company
hereby  certify  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

      1. Such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ending  February
28, 2007,  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information  contained in such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ending February 28, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 21, 2007
Grace 4, Inc.
By: /s/ Virginia K. Sourlis
    -----------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 11

- 00150

- CV

RECYCLED MATERIALS, INC. AND

MATBON, INC. APPELLANTS

V.

ALMA J. TAYLOR AND B ILL

JOSSERAND AS TRUSTEE FOR

ALMA J. TAYLOR TRUST APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 271ST DISTRICT COURT OF WISE COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

On June 2, 2011 and October 12, 2011 , we notified appellant s that the trial

court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court

that p ayment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as

required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

unless appellant s , within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s

record and provided thi s court with proof of payment.

Because appellant s have not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s

record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want

of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant s shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: December 8 , 2011
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 80 Filed 11/20/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1006
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS
I N RE:
SUN FAB I

NDUSTRI AL CONTRACTI

NG, I NC.,
REL ATOR. § § § § § No. 08-11-00085- CV AN ORI GI

NAL PROCEEDI

NG I N MANDA MUS

MEMORAN DUM OP INION ON P ETIT ION F OR WRIT OF M ANDAM US Relator see ks a writ of ma ndamus to overturn a

n order denying its motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the Fe dera l Arbitration Act ( “F AA”) . A writ of manda mus will i ssue only if the trial cour

t clear ly abused its discre tion and if the re lator has no a dequate reme dy by appea l. In re Prude ntial Ins. Co. of America , 148 S.W .3d 124, 135-36 (Te x . 2004). A pa rty may bring an interloc utory

appea l from an or der de ny ing a motion to compel arbitration under the FA A. See T E X .C I V .P R A C .&RE M .C O D E AN N . § 51.016 (West Supp. 2010); In re M errill Lynch & Co., Inc. , 315 S.W .3d 888, 891 n.3 (Tex. 2010)(orig . proce eding ); Sidley Austin Brown & W ood, LLP v. J.A . Gree n Dev . Corp. , 327 S.W .3d 859, 861 (Tex.App.--Da llas 2010, no pet.). B eca use Relator has a

n adequa te re medy by appea l, the petition for a wr it of mandamus is denied. See I n re H.D. Ve

st, Inc. , ___ S.W .3d ___, ___, 2010 WL4816067, at *1 (Te x .App.--E l Paso Nov. 29, 2010, orig . proce eding ). 1

An appe al, docke ted as No. 08- 10-00340-CV, is pendingin this C ourt from the same 1 order that is being challeng ed in this mandamus proce eding
.Marc h 23, 2011 DAVI D WEL L I NGTON CHEW, C hief Just ice Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ
.

-2-
Summary of Executive Officer and Non-employee Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.10 
 Summary of Executive Officer and Non-employee Director Compensation 
 Set forth below is a
summary of the compensation paid by Dril-Quip, Inc. (the “Company”) to its executive officers and non-employee directors as of the date of filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. For more information regarding executive
officer and director compensation, please read “Director Compensation,” “Executive Compensation,” and “Corporate Governance Matters—Related Person Transactions—Employment Agreements with Executive Officers”
contained in the Company’s proxy statement for its 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A. 
 Executive Officers 
 Each of the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer,
Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Vice President—Finance and Chief Financial Officer and Vice President—General Counsel and Secretary (each, an “Executive Officer”) is compensated in accordance with his
employment agreement, each of which is filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K/A filed December 12, 2011 and is incorporated by reference herein. 
 In addition, the Executive Officers are eligible to receive a performance bonus for 2013 performance under the Company’s Short Term Incentive Plan. The bonus award will be calculated based on
(i) the Company’s performance in the 12-month period ending December 31, 2013 against target performance, (ii) the Executive Officer’s achievement of personal objectives and (iii) the bonus target amounts for each
Executive Officer that are set by the Nominating, Governance and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. 
 Under the Company’s
2004 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “Long Term Incentive Plan”), employees may be granted awards in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, cash awards or performance awards. The current forms of
the applicable award agreements pursuant to the Company’s Long Term Incentive Plan are included as exhibits to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. 
 Non-Employee Directors 
 The non-employee Chairman of the Board receives an annual fee of
$150,000 and the Company’s other non-employee directors receive an annual fee of $75,000. In addition, the non-employee Chairman of the Board and the other non-employee directors receive a fee of $1,000 for attendance at each Board of Directors
meeting and $1,000 for each committee meeting. All directors are reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses and other expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board or its committees and for other expenses incurred in their capacity as
directors. 
 Under the Company’s Long Term Incentive Plan, non-employee directors may be granted awards in the form of stock options,
stock appreciation rights, stock awards, cash awards or performance awards. The current forms of the applicable award agreements pursuant to the Company’s Long Term Incentive Plan are included as exhibits to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5396 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5396

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for a 
   portion of any dividend received by a domestic corporation from a 
                     qualified foreign corporation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2004

 Mr. Acevedo-Vila introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for a 
   portion of any dividend received by a domestic corporation from a 
                     qualified foreign corporation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Financial Transactions Equity Act of 
2004''.

SEC. 2. DIVIDEND RECEIVED DEDUCTION FOR DIVIDENDS RECEIVED FROM 
              QUALIFIED FOREIGN CORPORATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 245 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to dividends received from certain foreign corporations) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Dividends Received From Corporations Organized Under the Laws 
of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of dividends received by a 
        domestic corporation from a corporation organized under the 
        laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, there shall be allowed 
        as a deduction an amount equal to the percent (specified in 
        section 243 for the taxable year) of such dividends.
            ``(2) Exclusion of certain dividends.--Paragraph (1) shall 
        not apply to any dividend received from a corporation organized 
        under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to the extent 
        that the dividend consists of earnings and profits accumulated 
        during a taxable year that such corporation was a controlled 
        foreign corporation (as defined in section 957).
            ``(3) Coordination with section 1248.--For purposes of this 
        subsection, the term `dividend' does not include any amount 
        treated as a dividend under section 1248.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
H. R. 5149

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To reauthorize the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families block grant program

through March 31, 2005, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Welfare Reform Extension Act,

Part VIII’’.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY

FAMILIES BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM THROUGH MARCH

31, 2005.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Activities authorized by part A of title IV

of the Social Security Act, and by sections 510, 1108(b), and 1925

of such Act, shall continue through March 31, 2005, in the manner

authorized for fiscal year 2004, notwithstanding section

1902(e)(1)(A) of such Act, and out of any money in the Treasury

of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby

appropriated such sums as may be necessary for such purpose.

Grants and payments may be made pursuant to this authority

through the second quarter of fiscal year 2005 at the level provided

for such activities through the second quarter of fiscal year 2004.

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— (1) SUPPLEMENTAL GRANTS FOR POPULATION INCREASES IN

CERTAIN STATES.—Section 403(a)(3)(H)(ii) of the Social Security

Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(3)(H)(ii)) is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2004’’ and inserting ‘‘March 31, 2005’’.

(2) CONTINGENCY FUND.—Section 403(b)(3)(C)(ii) of such

Act (42 U.S.C. 603(b)(3)(C)(ii)) is amended by striking ‘‘2004’’

and inserting ‘‘2005’’.

(3) MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT.—Section 409(a)(7) of such

Act (42 U.S.C. 609(a)(7)) is amended—

(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or 2005’’ and

inserting ‘‘2005, or 2006’’; and

(B) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking ‘‘2004’’ and

inserting ‘‘2005’’.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL RANDOM SAMPLE STUDY OF

CHILD WELFARE AND CHILD WELFARE WAIVER

AUTHORITY THROUGH MARCH 31, 2005.

Activities authorized by sections 429A and 1130(a) of the Social

Security Act shall continue through March 31, 2005, in the manner

authorized for fiscal year 2004, and out of any money in the

Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there
H. R. 5149—2

are hereby appropriated such sums as may be necessary for such

purpose. Grants and payments may be made pursuant to this

authority through the second quarter of fiscal year 2005 at the

level provided for such activities through the second quarter of

fiscal year 2004.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.