alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Norma Noemy Baksh, Appellant, v Mojamid Amin Baksh, Respondent.

[852 NYS2d 851]

The allegations set forth in the petition failed to state a cause of action constituting a family offense pursuant to Family Court Act § 812 (1) *(see Matter of Eck v Eck,*44 AD3d 1168, 1169 [2007]; *Matter of Santiago v Friedman,*35 AD3d 482 [2006]; *Matter of Thomas v Thomas,*32 AD3d 521 [2006]; *Matter of Ford v Pitts,*30 AD3d 419, 420 [2006]; *Swersky v Swersky,*299 AD2d 540 [2002]).

*729The appellant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review *(see Matter of Anthony R.,*43 AD3d 939 [2007]; *Matter of Rahmel S., 4*AD3d 365, 366 [2004]). Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Balkin', JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Initial Review Group; Subcommittee A—Cancer Centers.                    

*Date:*                         August 7, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Gail J. Bryant, MD, Scientific Review Officer, Resources and Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Blvd, Room 8107, MSC 8328, Bethesda, MD 20892-8328, (301) 402-0801,                         *gb30t@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 10, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-17049 Filed 7-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
The State of TexasAppellee



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 16, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00761

- CR

David CHARLES

, Appellant

v.

T he STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR5564

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of June, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 10.3**

 

 
| **Mic****haelanne C. Discepolo** | ** ** |
|----------------------------------|------------|
| Executive Vice  President        |       |
| Human Resources                  |       |

 

**PRIMEDIA**

**PRIMEDIA Inc.**

745 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10151

Tel: 212 745 0115

Fax: 212 745 1269

mike.discepolo@primedia.com

June 12, 2007

Mr. Dean Nelson

Dear Dean:

We are pleased to informyou that you are entitled to receive a special bonus of $1,000,000 (the “Bonus”),less applicable withholdings, upon the successful closing of the sale ofPRIMEDIA Enthusiast Media, Inc. to Source Interlink Companies, Inc. (the “Sale”)and the transition of operations and management of PRIMEDIA Inc. to Atlanta,Georgia. The Bonus will be payable within ten days of the later to occur– theclosing of the Sale or the completion of the transition of the corporate activitiesto Atlanta (the “Payment Date”).

In the event thatPRIMEDIA Inc. terminates your employment for “Cause” prior to the Payment Date,you would no longer be entitled to receive the Bonus. For purposes of thisLetter Agreement, “cause” shall include any act of dishonesty committed by youin connection with your employment, substance abuse, conviction of a felony,behavior injurious to PRIMEDIA, the willful or repeated failure or refusal toperform your duties or gross insubordination.

In the event thatPRIMEDIA terminates your employment without Cause prior to the Payment Date,you shall remain entitled to the Bonus.

In the event youvoluntarily terminate your employment prior to the Payment Date, you would nolonger be entitled to receive the Bonus.
|        | Very truly yours,  |
|--------|--------------------|
|   | Mike Discepolo     |
|   | /s/ Mike Discepolo |   |

 

----
The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, Chief Judge, United States District Court

1

for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable

Jonathan G. Lebedoff, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-1356

___________

James E. Mooney, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

 * District of Minnesota.

State of Minnesota, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: May 26, 1998

 Filed: May 27, 1998

___________

Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,

Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

James E. Mooney appeals from the district court&s denial of his motion to

1

proceed in forma pauperis and dismissal of his complaint prior to service pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Liberally construing Mr. Mooney&s complaint and
-2-

accepting his contention that he sued the Minnesota Department of Corrections and

state agents in their “official capacity,” we conclude his action requesting declaratory

relief for conduct that occurred over thirty-five years earlier was barred by the Eleventh

Amendment. See Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 506

U.S. 139, 146 (1993); Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89, 99-

100 (1984). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 29, 2013

d0422 

# Order

April 29, 2013

145565(16)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145565

COA: 307732

Wayne CC: 02

- 014810

- FH

ELIZABETH LLOYD,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November

20, 2012 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order

was entered erroneously.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10772 Summary Calendar

In re: HAROLD O’CONNOR, Debtor,

--------------------------------------------------- GREG GUTMAN and PRESTON NATIONAL BANK, Appellants,

versus HAROLD O’CONNOR, Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC Nos. 3:01-CV-2606-D; 3:01-CV-2607-D____

-------------------- February 13, 2003 Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * In this bankruptcy litigation matter, the bankruptcy court imposed sanctions pursuant to Rule 9011, Fed. Bankr. R.P., the sanctions provision substantially similar to Rule 11, Fed. R. Civ. P. The district court, acting in its appellate capacity,No. 02-10772 -2- affirmed the bankruptcy court. In their appeal, appellants argue i.) the bankruptcy court committed error in assessing sanctions against appellants for allegedly violating the automatic stay imposed by the court pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362; ii.) the bankruptcy court committed error by failing to sanction appellee’s counsel for violation Rule 9011, Fed. Bankr. R.P.; iii.) the bankruptcy court committed error by failing to sanction appellee’s counsel for presenting perjured testimony in support of debtor-appellee’s motion for contempt. It is well-settled that “[w]e review the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact under the clearly erroneous standard and decide issues of law de novo.” In re First City Bancorporation of Texas
Inc. , 282 F.3d 864, 867 (5th Cir. 2002) (citing Henderson v. Belknap (In re Henderson) , 18 F.3d 1305, 1307 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1014 (1994)). As the imposition of sanctions is discretionary, we review the exercise of this power for an abuse of discretion. See First City Bancorporation , 282 F.3d at 867; Matter of Terrebonne Fuel and Lube, Inc. , 108 F.3d 609, 613 (5th Cir.1997). "A court abuses its discretion when its ruling is based on an erroneous view of the law or on a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence." Chaves v. M/V Medina
Star , 47 F.3d 153, 156 (5th Cir. 1995). Bankruptcy courts, in general, should exercise restraint when considering using its inherent power to impose sanctions. See id.No. 02-10772 -3- Our review of the record supports the conclusion of the bankruptcy court that appellant ignored the automatic stay imposed by the bankruptcy court, that this conduct merited sanction, and that the sanction imposed does not constitute an abuse of discretion. Thus, we find no merit to the arguments advanced by appellant in this appeal. The judgment of the bankruptcy court is AFFIRMED.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Robert Earl Byrd v. The State of Texas

Ap pellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00 108

- CR

Trial court case number: 1578701

Trial court: 178 th District Court of Harris County

Appellant and the State ha ve filed a joint motion to abate the appeal to allow

the trial court to issue findings and fact and conclusions of law on appellant’s motion to suppress evidence.

We grant the motion and abate the appeal and remand for the trial court to enter written findings of fact and conclusions of law, separate and apart from any docket sheet notations in this case, in conjunction with the trial court’s denial of appellant’ s motion to suppress eviden ce

. See State v. Cullen , 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (holding that trial court must provide findings of fact and conclusions of law adequate to provide appellate court with basis to review trial court’s application of law to facts, either i n writing or on record at hearing); Wicker

v. State , 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987) ; T EX

. R. A PP . P. 44.4.

The trial court shall make the appropriate findings and conclusions and shall

cause them to be filed with the trial court clerk within 3 0 days of the date of this

order. We further order t he trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law with this Court within 30 days of the date of this order.

This appeal is a

bated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket without further order of the Court when the supplemental clerk’s record is filed in this Court.

It is so ORDERED.Judge’s signature:

_____ /s/ Sherry Radack

_______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___ April 7, 2020

____
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

# AGENCY:

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

# ACTION:

Notice.

*Board Action:*                     Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules of Procedure, as amended in April, 2004, notice is hereby given that the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has released the Exposure Draft on                     *Accounting for Federal Oil and Gas Resources.*

                    The exposure draft proposes standards that would result in recognition of the estimated value of royalties from Federal oil and gas leases and changes in those values over time as well as the amount of royalties designated for distribution to non-Federal entities such as State governments. The Exposure Draft is available on the FASAB home page                     *http://www.fasab.gov/​exposure.html.*                     Copies can be obtained by contacting FASAB at (202) 512-7350.                

Respondents are encouraged to comment on any part of the exposure draft. Written comments are requested by September 8, 2009, and should be sent to: Wendy M. Payne, Executive Director, Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board, 441 G Street, NW., Suite 6814, Mail Stop 6K17V, Washington, DC 20548.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Wendy Payne, Executive Director, at (202) 512-7350.

Authority:  Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463.

Dated: July 7, 2009.

Charles Jackson,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-16399 Filed 7-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-01-P
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.      SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (a) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:   | /s/ Barry                Zyskind                                                                                                 |
|--------|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |            | Barry                Zyskind  President                and Chief Executive Officer*(Principal                Executive Officer)* |

----
EXHIBIT 31.02

CERTIFICATION

(Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a))

I, Eric E. Rhodes, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Bank of the Carolinas Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter business that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  |  |                                           
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Eric E. Rhodes                        
|                        |  |  |  | Eric E. Rhodes                            
|                        |  |  |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16571]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, July 20, 2009, 8 a.m. to July 
21, 2009, 5 p.m., Melrose Hotel, 2430 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20037 which was published in the Federal Register on 
June 15, 2009, 74 FR 28260-28262.
    The meeting will be held at the Ritz Carlton Hotel, 1150 22nd 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037. The meeting dates and time remain 
the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: July 7, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
 [FR Doc. E9-16571 Filed 7-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# cpsaat27
40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004

Chart 5-1. After rising for several decades, the labor force 

participation rate for women has shown no growth in recent 

years

NOTE: Shaded areas represent recessions. Data are seasonally adjusted.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Adult men

Adult women

Percent

Teenagers

Chart 5-1. After rising for several decades, the labor force 

participation rate for women has shown no growth in recent 

years

• The labor force participation rate for adult women rose dramatically during the 

1970s and 1980s. In the 1990s, growth in participation slowed substantially. 

The participation rate has shown no growth in recent years. 

• The participation rate for adult men has waned over time. 

• The participation rate for teenagers (both sexes, 16 to 19 years old) has trended 

downward since the late 1970s. From 2000 to 2003, the rate declined sharply. 

The teen rate is more cyclically sensitive than that for adults.