alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000884504
<NAME> THERMOENERGY CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         113,220
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,220
<PP&E>                                          19,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                (19,809)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 594,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,078,327
<BONDS>                                        956,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,487
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,443,332)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   594,482
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  199,219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (243,660)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (243,660)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
| Dated:      November 9,2010      |   |                         |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                             |   |                         |   |
|                             | By:    | /s/ Peter J. Dalton          |   |
|                             |   | Peter      J. Dalton         |   |
|                             |   | Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|                             |   |                         |   |
| Dated: November 9,2010 |   |                         |   |
|                             |   |                         |   |
|                             | By:    | /s/ Dirk Wild                |   |
|                             |   | Dirk      Wild               |   |
|                             |   | Chief      Financial Officer |   |

----
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

27. Unemployed persons by reason for unemployment, sex, and age

[Numbers in thousands]

Reason

Total,

16 years

and over

Men,

20 years

and over

Women,

20 years

and over

Both sexes,

16 to 19

years

2020 2021 2020 2021 2020 2021 2020 2021

NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYED

Total unemployed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,947 8,623 6,118 4,302 5,804 3,625 1,025 696

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs. . . 9,770 5,099 4,837 2,827 4,507 2,130 426 142

On temporary layoff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,371 1,582 2,917 837 3,121 680 333 66

Not on temporary layoff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,399 3,516 1,920 1,990 1,386 1,450 92 76

Permanent job losers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,655 2,799 1,480 1,554 1,107 1,190 68 55

Persons who completed temporary jobs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 744 717 440 436 279 260 25 21

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 683 803 343 383 296 372 44 48

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,969 2,204 817 956 872 1,007 281 241

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 526 518 121 136 130 116 275 266

PERCENT DISTRIBUTION

Total unemployed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs. . . 75.5 59.1 79.1 65.7 77.6 58.8 41.5 20.4

On temporary layoff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49.2 18.4 47.7 19.5 53.8 18.7 32.5 9.4

Not on temporary layoff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26.3 40.8 31.4 46.3 23.9 40.0 9.0 10.9

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.3 9.3 5.6 8.9 5.1 10.3 4.3 6.8

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15.2 25.6 13.3 22.2 15.0 27.8 27.4 34.6

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1 6.0 2.0 3.2 2.2 3.2 26.8 38.2

UNEMPLOYED AS A PERCENT OF THE

CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs. . . 6.1 3.2 5.9 3.4 6.2 2.9 7.4 2.4

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.8

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2 1.4 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.4 4.9 4.0

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 4.8 4.5

NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

1
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 139 (Wednesday, July 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 36227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17418]



[[Page 36227]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Reissuances

    Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 
U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to 
the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           License No.                           Name/address                           Date reissued
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
020890N.........................  Aegis International, Inc., 300 Sunset      May 6, 2009.
                                   Road, Suite 301, Burlington TWP, NJ
                                   08016.
000858F.........................  John A. Steer Co., 28 South 2nd Street,    April 29, 2009.
                                   Philadelphia, PA 19106.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. E9-17418 Filed 7-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 31, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00308

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.C

.

From the 2 85th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021EM503388
Honorable Nick Catoe Jr. , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On August 30, 2022 , this court received appellant ’s brief. The brief violates Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38 in that it does not (1) identify the parties and counsel; (2) include a table of contents; (3) include an index of authorities; (4) include a statement of the case; (5)
include a brief state ment of the issues presented; (6) include record references in the statement of facts; (7) include a summary of the argument; (8) include a conclusion stating the nature of the relief sought. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.1

. While substantial compliance with Rule 38 is sufficient, this court may order a party to amend, supplement, or redraw a brief if it flagrantly violates Rule

38. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.9(a). We conclude that the formal defects described above constitute flagrant violations of Rule 38.

We, the refore, ORDER Appellant Guillermo Valverde III to file an amended brief within
twenty days from the date of this order. If the amended brief does not correct the violations, we may strike the brief and prohibit appellant from filing another. See T EX

. R. A P P

. P. 38.9(a); see also id. 42.3(c) (allowing dismissal of appellant’s appeal if appellant fails to comply with a requirement of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure or an order of this court).

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 31st day of August, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
35

Table 12. Employed women by occupation, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, 2006 annual averages

(Percent distribution)

 Total, 16 years and over (thousands)................................... 53,950 8,410 3,011 7,725

 Percent.......................................................................... 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Management, professional, and related occupations ..................... 38.9 31.1 45.7 22.1

Management, business, and financial operations occupations ... 13.8 10.0 14.5 8.3

Professional and related occupations ......................................... 25.2 21.1 31.2 13.9

Service occupations ....................................................................... 19.3 27.3 18.5 30.6

Sales and office occupations .......................................................... 34.8 32.3 27.3 32.7

Sales and related occupations .................................................... 12.4 10.9 11.6 12.6

Office and administrative support occupations ........................... 22.4 21.4 15.7 20.2

Natural resources, construction, and maintenance occupations .... 1.1 1.0 .7 2.2

Farming, fishing, and forestry occupations ................................. .3 .2 .2 1.0

Construction and extraction occupations .................................... .5 .3 .3 .9

Installation, maintenance, and repair occupations ...................... .4 .5 .3 .3

Production, transportation, and material moving occupations ........ 5.8 8.3 7.7 12.3

Production occupations ............................................................... 4.0 5.2 6.7 9.0

Transportation and material moving occupations ....................... 1.8 3.1 1.0 3.3

 SOURCE: Current Population Survey, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Hispanic or 

Latino

ethnicity

Occupation White

Black or 

African

American

Asian

35

1.8
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 140 (Thursday, July 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 36496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17435]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial 
Research Special Emphasis Panel, Review of R03 and ARRA Revision 
Applications.
    Date: July 31, 2009.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Jonathan Horsford, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Natl Inst of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Room 664, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-594-4859, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#553d3a2726333a273f1538343c397b3b3c3d7b323a23"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ae2e5f8f9ece5f8e0cae7ebe3e6a4e4e3e2a4ede5fc">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 16, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-17435 Filed 7-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.5






Exhibit 10.5


Summary of the principal terms of the lease agreements
between Finisar Israel (formerly Red-C Optical Networks Ltd.) and Kiryat Atidim
(Original document in Hebrew)


Beginning on April 1, 2005, Red-C Optical Networks Ltd. (now Finisar Israel) entered into a lease agreement with Landlord Kiryat Atidim regarding office space located at Atidim Technology Park, Building #3, POB 58101, Tel Aviv 61580 Israel.  The initial term of 5 years was renewed in 2010 for an additional 5 years running until April 1, 2015. The current total leased space is 2,046 square meters.  


The current monthly rental payment is ILS 239,505, which is adjusted annually to the change in the Israeli Consumer Price Index.  There is no security deposit required under the terms of the lease.  Finisar Israel is entitled to terminate the lease for part of the premises or terminate the lease entirely without penalty by giving the landlord 12 months prior notice.  The lease agreement also contains customary terms and conditions.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5280-N-28]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         July 24, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                    *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: July 16, 2009.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. E9-17324 Filed 7-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Click Commerce, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael W. Ferro,
Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company] and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed as
part of the Form 10-K.



Dated: February 4, 2005              /s/  Michael W. Ferro, Jr.
                                     --------------------------
                                       Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of USA Video Interactive Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edwin Molina, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:

/s/Edwin Molina



Edwin Molina,

Chief Executive Officer

March 31st, 2008
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

NICHOLAS ST. CLAIRE THOMPSON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-429 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed November 1, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge. Nicholas St. Claire Thompson, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
VILLANTI, SALARIO, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42834

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

THOMAS HENRY BUCK,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 566

Filed: July 27, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Cheri C. Copsey, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and sentence of a unified term of five years with three 

years determinate for stalking in the first degree, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Brian R. Dickson, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Jessica M. Lorello, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Thomas Henry Buck pled guilty to stalking in the first degree. Idaho Code § 18-7905. 

The district court sentenced Buck to a unified term of five years with three years determinate, to 

run consecutive to a separate sentence. Buck appeals contending that the district court abused its 

discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 
2

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Buck’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.