alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

A.K. : Hon. Joseph H. Rodriguez

 

 Plaintiff, : Civil Action No. 11-4243

 v. : ORDER 

NORTHERN BURLINGTON REGIONAL : 

SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al,

 Defendants. :

This matter having come before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand

[Docket Entry # 3]; and the Court having considered the written submissions of the

parties, as well as having heard oral argument on the matter; and for the reasons

expressed in the Opinion issued on even date,

IT IS on this 1st day of February, 2012 hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion

to Remand is GRANTED; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter BE REMANDED to the Superior

Court of New Jersey, Burlington County, Law Division for want of federal subject matter

jurisdiction.

 /s/ Joseph H. Rodriguez 

Hon. Joseph H. Rodriguez

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-04243-JHR-KMW Document 13 Filed 02/01/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 122
ES OF AMERICA : Hon. Stanley R. Chesler

Crirn. No. 11-417

v •

CONTINUANCE ORDER

LANCE POWELL

This matter having come before the Court on the joint

application of Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the

District of New Jersey (Shirley U. Emehelu, Assistant U.S.

Attorney, appearing), and defendant Lance Powell (Paul

Casteleiro, Esq.., appearing), for an order granting a continuance

of the proceedings in the above-captioned matter, and the

defendant being aware that he has the right to have the matter

brought to trial within 70 days of the date of his appearance

before a judicial officer of this court pursuant to Title 18,

United States Code, Section 3161(c) (1>, and the defendant having

consented to such a continuance, and it appearing that the

defendant waives such right, and for good and sufficient cause

shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should

be continued for the following reasons:

1. Defendant requests a one-week extension of his

deadline to tile pre—trial motions;

2. The Government will need time to respond to

defendant’ s motions;
to negotiate a plea agreement, which would render any trial of

this matter unnecessary;

4. As a result of the foregoing, pursuant to Title

18, United States Code, Section 3161(h) (7), the ends of justice

served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interest of

the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS, therefore, on this day of September, 2011,

ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, continued

until November 15, 2011; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant’s motions are due on or before

September 16, 2011; and it is further

ORDERED that the Government’s response is due on or

before September 26, 2011; and it is further

ORDERED that a motion hearing is scheduled for

(C± / / , 2011 at I /;i; and it is

further

ORDERED that trial in this matter shall commence on

November 15, 2011 at 10:00 a.m..; and it is further

ORDERED that the period from the date of this order

through November 15, 2011 shall be excludable in computing time

under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974.

I

p

JjD STANLEY R. CHESLER

United States District Judge
irley (1. Ehe1u

Assistan orney

Paul as e

Counsel for defendant Lance Powell
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. : [PROPOSED] AMENDED ORDER OF

RESTITUTION

MICHAEL ARATO : Cr. No. 11-090 (JLL)

AL RAIMI : Cr. No. 11-116 (JLL)

Defendant Michael Arato and defendant Al Raimi having

been convicted of and sentenced in the above-captioned cases for

violating Title 18, United States Code, Section 201 (Bribery of a

Public Official) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 654

(Theft by a Government Officer), respectively, and the Court

having ordered restitution as part of the Judgements of

Conviction against both defendants; and following the entry of

those Judgements, the Office of the Inspector General -

Department of Homeland Security (OIG-DHS) having determined that

it still had $250 in its possession that defendant Arato had

stolen from certain of the victims, namely victim M.C. ($100),

victim V.D. ($100) and victim E.K. ($50), and that had been

obtained by OIG-DHS during the course of the investigation; and

the government now seeking to return this money directly to these

victims from whom it was stolen and to have the amounts to be

returned to these victims by OIG-DHS deducted from the

restitution amounts previously ordered for these victims; and the

defense counsel for both defendants having consented to the

restitution order being amended as follows;

IT IS on this Wday of April, 2012,

ORDERED, that the previous restitution ordered in these

cases be amended as follows:

Name of Payee (victim): Amount of Restitution

J.V. $1,450

D.B. $1,000

C.S. $ 300

A.A. $6,000

K.S. $ 500

V.J. $ 500

Case 2:11-cr-00090-JLL Document 20 Filed 04/10/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 63
T.B. $9,900

M.R. $3,000

RS. $ 700

M.C. $ 300

V.D. $ 100

E.K. $ 50

C.N. $ 100

It is further ORDERED that the following money that is

still in the possession of OIG-DHS be returned upon entry of this

Order, as follows.

Name of Payee (victim): Amount to be Returned

M.C. $ 100

V.D. $ 100

E.K. $ 50

It is further ORDERED that the amounts ordered

represent the total amounts due to the victims for these losses.

The amounts shall be payable without interest. A defendant’s

restitution obligation shall not be affected by any restitution

payments made by the other defendant, except that no further

payments shall be required after the sums of the amounts actually

paid by all defendants have fully satisfied these losses.

States District Judge

2

Case 2:11-cr-00090-JLL Document 20 Filed 04/10/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 64
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 130 (Thursday, July 9, 2009)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 32785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16348]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 130 / Thursday, July 9, 2009 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 32785]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2009-22 of July 1, 2009

                
Presidential Determination Under Section 402 
                (c)(2)(A) of the Trade Act of 1974--Republic of Belarus

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to section 402(c)(2)(A)of the Trade Act of 
                1974 (Public Law 93-618), as amended (the ``Act''), I 
                determine that a waiver by Executive Order of the 
                application of subsections (a) and (b) of section 402 
                of the Act with respect to Belarus will substantially 
                promote the objectives of section 402.

                You are authorized and directed to transmit this 
                determination to the Congress and to publish it in the 
                Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, July 1, 2009.

[FR Doc. E9-16348
Filed 7-8-09; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PRIMEDIA Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew A. Flynn, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|/s/MATTHEW A. FLYNNMatthew A. Flynn                                      |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | 
|Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerMay 10, 2004

This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5214 

To require combination 3-point safety belts on all school buses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 5, 2004 

Mr. BACA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require combination 3-point safety belts on all school 

buses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save Every Child 

5 Using Restraints Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) According to a National Transportation 

9 Safety Board report, the current safety feature of 

10 compartmentalization does not protect school bus 

11 passengers during lateral impacts and rollover crash-
2 

•HR 5214 IH 

1 es because passengers do not always remain com2 pletely in their seat. 

3 (2) Studies by the National Highway Traffic 

4 Safety Administration indicated less trauma to the 

5 head and neck of those passengers wearing 3-point 

6 safety belts in school buses than by passengers in 

7 buses without 3-point safety belts, or wearing only 

8 lap safety belts. 

9 (3) Such studies also concluded that 3-point 

10 safety belts may not be compatible with seats de11 signed according to the current safety mechanism of 

12 compartmentalization. 

13 (4) Such studies have also shown the need for 

14 proper use of safety belts and the need for increased 

15 education in school bus safety and safety belt use. 

16 SEC. 3. 3-POINT SAFETY BELTS IN SCHOOL BUSES. 

17 The Secretary of Transportation shall prescribe regu18 lations establishing a safety standard requiring that all 

19 school buses with a gross vehicle weight of more than 

20 10,000 pounds be equipped with 3-point safety belts on 

21 all seats. In formulating the safety standard, the Secretary 

22 shall consider the compatibility of 3-point safety belts on 

23 seats designed according to the current safety mechanism 
3 

•HR 5214 IH 

1 of compartmentalization, as designated by the National 

2 Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Ben Franklin Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Glen A. Miller, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (2) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 13, 2010



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ Glen A. Miller                        
|Glen A. Miller                            
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA CC: 

# Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge

Fabien Hunt Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

2 (0) I947A mize,
Case 2:11-cr-00165-KSH Document 32 Filed 04/12/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 96
WASH 2012.12.31 Exhibit 10.53






EXHIBIT 10.53


TERMS OF CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT WITH AN EXECUTIVE OFFICER


The form of Change in Control Agreement (the “Agreement”), filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, contains blanks where the multiple of the executive's base amount and the term of continued benefits provided under the Agreement vary for certain executives.  On January 10, 2013 the Registrant entered into such an Agreement with the executive officer below, providing continued benefits for the term, and at the multiple of such executive's base amount, as listed in the following chart:


	
			
	 
	Number of Times Base Amount
	Term of Continued Benefits

	Executive Officer
	Section (4 a)
	Section (4 b & c)

	Kristen L. DiSanto
	 
	 

	Executive Vice President, Human Resources
	2 times
	24 months
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of SPEAR & JACKSON,
INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending September 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William Fletcher, principal accounting officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                               /s/ William Fletcher
                                                   ---------------------------
                                          Name:    William Fletcher
                                          Title:   Principal Accounting Officer
                                          Dated:   May 27, 2003
AMENDMENT 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS
FIRST AMENDMENT to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of February
28, 2013, by and between ADVANCED PHOTONIX, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and
RICHARD D. KURTZ (“Employee”).


 


Recitals


 


A.Company and Employee are parties
to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of August 19, 2011 (the “Employment Agreement”).


 


B.Company has requested that
Employee amend the Employment Agreement and Employee has consented to the Amendment in accordance with the terms and subject to
the conditions set forth herein.


 


Agreement


 


Now,
Therefore, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy
of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.                  
Definitions.
Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings given to them in the Employment Agreement.


 


2.                  
Amendments to Employment Agreement. Section
3.1 of the Employment Agreement is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 


 


“3.1.Base Salary.
In consideration of the services to be performed by Employee during the Employment Period, the Company agrees to pay Employee a
base salary (“Base Salary”) at the rate of $295,000 per year payable in accordance with the Company’s
customary payroll practices as in effect from time to time. Base Salary will be reviewed no less frequently than annually, and
may be increased (but not decreased) in the sole discretion of the independent directors of the Board or the Compensation Committee
of the Board (the “Committee”). Notwithstanding the preceding, from the period commencing March 1, 2013 and
ending July 31, 2013, the Base Salary payable pursuant to this Section 3.1 shall be reduced by twenty percent (20%).”


 


3.                  
Limitation of Amendment.
Except as expressly provided herein, the terms, covenants and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unamended and
shall continue to be and shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their respective terms. The terms set forth herein
shall be limited precisely as provided for herein to the provisions expressly referred to herein and shall not be deemed an amendment
or modification of or consent to any other term or provision of the Employment Agreement, or otherwise prejudice any right or remedy
which either party may now have or may have in the future under or in connection with the Employment Agreement.


 


4.                  
Counterparts.
This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and all of such counterparts taken together shall be deemed to constitute
one and the same instrument.


 


In
Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first
written above.


 


 








	COMPANY	 	 	EMPLOYEE
	 	 	 	 
	ADVANCED PHOTONIX, INC.	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:
    /s/Jeff Anderson	 	 	/s/
    Richard Kurtz
	Name: Jeff Anderson	 	 	Richard Kurtz
	Title: Chief Financial
    Officer
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

30. Unemployed total and full-time workers by duration of unemployment

[Numbers in thousands]

Duration of unemployment

Total Full-time workers

Unemployed Percent distribution Unemployed Percent distribution

2021 2022 2021 2022 2021 2022 2021 2022

Total unemployed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,623 5,996 100.0 100.0 7,246 4,879 100.0 100.0

Less than 5 weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,140 2,216 24.8 37.0 1,586 1,640 21.9 33.6

5 to 14 weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,981 1,711 23.0 28.5 1,651 1,423 22.8 29.2

5 to 10 weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,325 1,177 15.4 19.6 1,088 965 15.0 19.8

11 to 14 weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 657 534 7.6 8.9 563 458 7.8 9.4

15 weeks and over. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,501 2,070 52.2 34.5 4,008 1,817 55.3 37.2

15 to 26 weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,164 756 13.5 12.6 1,029 658 14.2 13.5

27 weeks and over. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,337 1,314 38.7 21.9 2,979 1,159 41.1 23.8

27 to 51 weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,341 409 15.6 6.8 1,204 358 16.6 7.3

52 weeks and over. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,996 905 23.2 15.1 1,775 801 24.5 16.4

Average (mean) duration, in weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28.7 22.6 – – 30.1 24.1 – –

Median duration, in weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.5 8.7 – – 19.1 9.6 – –

NOTE: Full-time workers are unemployed persons looking for full-time work (35 hours or more per week) or on layoff from full-time jobs. Updated population controls are

introduced annually with the release of January data. Dash indicates no data or data that do not meet publication criteria (values not shown where base is less than

35,000).

1
Case 2:11-cv-02461-FSH-MAH Document 10 Filed 05/19/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 69
Case 2:11-cv-02461-FSH-MAH Document 10 Filed 05/19/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 70
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5331 

To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the 

reduction in Medicare payment through competitive bidding for certain 

items of durable medical equipment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2004 

Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 

the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security 

Act to repeal the reduction in Medicare payment through 

competitive bidding for certain items of durable medical 

equipment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5331 IH 

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REDUCTION IN MEDICARE PAY2 MENTS THROUGH COMPETITIVE BIDDING 

3 FOR CERTAIN ITEMS OF DURABLE MEDICAL 

4 EQUIPMENT. 

5 Section 1834(h)(4)(C) of the Social Security Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 1395m(h)(4)(C)), as amended by section 627(b)(1) 

7 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and 

8 Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108–173), is 

9 amended by striking ‘‘(and includes shoes described in sec10 tion 1861(s)(12))’’. 

Æ