alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Matthew McNeally, Chief Executive Officer of Capital Group  One,
Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Capital
Group One, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-
14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
indicated in this annual report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 15, 2007

/s/ Matthew McNeally
-----------------------
Matthew McNeally
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000

<CASH>                                         31,228
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  277,596
<ALLOWANCES>                                   32,697
<INVENTORY>                                    33,076
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               422,707
<PP&E>                                         345,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                 188,962
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,660,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          551,392
<BONDS>                                        1,557,435
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          560,508
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,341,193
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,373,531)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,660,970
<SALES>                                        829,977
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               829,977
<CGS>                                          200,281
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  200,281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               607,506
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             75,319
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (46,499)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (46,499)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (46,499)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.47)



</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, the undersigned, Jay C. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer, of Forgent
Networks, Inc. (the Company), certify, that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
Company (the Report);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the periods covered by this Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in the Report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
the Report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
Company and we have (a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within these entities, particularly
during the period in which the Report is being prepared; (b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in the Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by the Report based on such evaluation;
and (c) disclosed in the Report any change in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys
most recent fiscal quarter (the quarter ended April 30, 2004) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls
over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and to the Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors: (a) all significant
deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls. /s/ JAY C. PETERSONJay C. PetersonChief Financial OfficerJune 14, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                        ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                             DENARII RESOURCES INC.
             FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2008
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Chris Lori, am the Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer
of Denarii Resources Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering
this  certificate  in connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company  for the six  month  period  ended  June  30,  2008 and  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information
contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 31, 2008

                                         By: /s/ Chris Lori
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             CHRIS LORI
                                             Chief Executive Officer, President,
                                             acting Chief Financial Officer,
                                             acting Principal Accounting Officer
                                             and Director
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of World Am, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert A.
      Hovee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                    April 11, 2008
            
            /s/
                Robert A. HoveeBy:
                    Robert A. HoveeChief
                  Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      World Am, Inc. and will be retained by World Am, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
HOUSEHOLD DATA HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES ANNUAL AVERAGES

27. Unemployed persons by reason for unemployment, sex, and age

(Numbers in thousands)

Reason

Total,

16 years

and over

Men,

20 years

and over

Women,

20 years

and over

Both sexes,

16 to 19

years

2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008

NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYED

 Total unemployed .................................................................. 7,078 8,924 3,259 4,297 2,718 3,342 1,101 1,285

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs .......... 3,515 4,789 2,064 2,918 1,276 1,668 176 203

 On temporary layoff ................................................................ 976 1,176 580 751 333 352 63 72

 Not on temporary layoff .......................................................... 2,539 3,614 1,483 2,167 943 1,316 113 131

 Permanent job losers ............................................................ 1,781 2,670 1,013 1,574 696 1,013 72 83

 Persons who completed temporary jobs .............................. 758 943 470 593 247 302 42 48

Job leavers ............................................................................... 793 896 371 410 351 406 71 80

Reentrants ................................................................................ 2,142 2,472 723 856 984 1,126 435 490

New entrants ............................................................................ 627 766 101 113 107 143 419 511

PERCENT DISTRIBUTION

 Total unemployed .................................................................. 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs .......... 49.7 53.7 63.3 67.9 46.9 49.9 16.0 15.8

 On temporary layoff ............................................................... 13.8 13.2 17.8 17.5 12.2 10.5 5.7 5.6

 Not on temporary layoff ......................................................... 35.9 40.5 45.5 50.4 34.7 39.4 10.3 10.2

Job leavers ............................................................................... 11.2 10.0 11.4 9.5 12.9 12.1 6.5 6.3

Reentrants ................................................................................ 30.3 27.7 22.2 19.9 36.2 33.7 39.5 38.1

New entrants ............................................................................ 8.9 8.6 3.1 2.6 3.9 4.3 38.0 39.8

UNEMPLOYED AS A PERCENT OF THE

 CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs .......... 2.3 3.1 2.6 3.7 1.9 2.4 2.5 3.0

Job leavers ............................................................................... .5 .6 .5 .5 .5 .6 1.0 1.2

Reentrants ................................................................................ 1.4 1.6 .9 1.1 1.5 1.6 6.2 7.1

New entrants ............................................................................ .4 .5 .1 .1 .2 .2 6.0 7.5

 NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

240
#### Laurentino Rodrigues, Appellant, v Donald Caetano, Respondent.

[856 NYS2d 150]

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for costs against the plaintiff for engaging in frivolous conduct. Conduct is frivolous if “it is undertaken primarily to delay or prolong the resolution of the litigation, or to harass or maliciously injure another” (22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c] [2]). Since the plaintiff admitted that after commencing the action he no longer wanted to pursue it, and took no steps to discontinue the action, awarding costs to the defendant to reimburse him for *708actual expenses and attorney’s fees reasonably incurred to defend against and to obtain dismissal of the action was proper *(see*22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [a]; *Moran v Regency Sav. Bank, F.S.B.,*20 AD3d 305, 306-307 [2005]; *Timoney v Newmark & Co. Real Estate,*299 AD2d 201, 202 [2002]; *Janitschek v Trustees of Friends World Coll.,*249 AD2d 368, 369 [1998]; *cf. Juron & Minzner v State Farm Ins. Co.,*303 AD2d 463 [2003]).

Furthermore, the Supreme Court properly articulated the basis for its determination pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.2.

The plaintiffs remaining contention is without merit. Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Covello, McCarthy and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Case 2:11-mj-08143-MCA Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 11
Case 2:11-mj-08143-MCA Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 12
Case 2:11-mj-08143-MCA Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 13
EXHIBIT 32





<PAGE>


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tian'an Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Weng Jianjun, the
Principal Executive Officer and Zhu Jie, the Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of her knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


                                 TIAN'AN PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.



May 14, 2007                     /s/ Weng Jianjun
                                 ------------------------------------------
                                 Weng Jianjun, Principal Executive Officer


May 14, 2007                     /s/ Zhu Jie
                                 ------------------------------------------
                                 Zhu Jie, Principal Financial and Accounting
                                 Officer
Exhibit 31.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES


EXCHANGE


ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, A. Lanham Napier, certify that:




1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rackspace Hosting, Inc.;




2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. [This certification is intentionally omitted because this amendment does not contain financial statements or other financial information.];




4. [This certification is intentionally omitted because this amendment does not contain or amend disclosure pursuant to Item 307 or 308 of Regulation S-K, and such disclosure is not otherwise required to be amended given the nature and reasons for the amendment.]; and




5. [This certification is intentionally omitted because this amendment does not contain or amend disclosure pursuant to Item 307 or 308 of Regulation S-K, and such disclosure is not otherwise required to be amended given the nature and reasons for the amendment.].





Date: July 19, 2010



By:

/s/ A. Lanham NapierA. Lanham NapierChief Executive Officer, President and Director(Principal Executive Officer)
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
  We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption
  "Independent Auditors" and to the use of our report dated
  January 14, 1999,in the Registration Statement and related
  Prospectus of The Municipal Bond Trust, Series 222.
  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
  New York, New York
  January 26, 1999
1

 The p etitioner has procee ded in this c ase as if it were an ap peal as o f right, an ap peal to

which he is not entitled. We will treat his brief as an application pursuant to T.C.A. § 40-30-216(c).

FILED

October 15, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

 AT KNOXVILLE 

 SEPTEMBER 1998 SESSION

KENNETH RUSSELL LEWIS, )

)

Appellant, ) No. 03C01-9802-CR-00054

 )

) Hamilton County

v. ) 

) Honorable Stephen M. Bevil, Judge 

)

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) (Post-Conviction)

) 

Appellee. )

O R D E R

The petitioner, Kenneth Russell Lewis, has applied for permission to

appeal from the Hamilton County Criminal Court’s refusal to reopen his post-conviction

case that had previously been dismissed with prejudice.1 He is seeking relief relative to

his second degree murder conviction upon his guilty plea in December 1991 for which

he received a twenty-five year sentence. He asserts that (1) the dismissal of his postconviction case with his purported agreement resulted from the ineffective assistance of

counsel, (2) the state has violated its agreement not to oppose parole, and (3) his

attorney in the convicting case was ineffective in representing him. He also has moved

for consideration of “Post-Judgment Facts” by which he seeks to submit for our

consideration medical records that he claims bear upon his issues regarding counsel. 

Pursuant to T.C.A. § 40-30-216(c), the petitioner could seek review of the

denial of his motion to reopen by filing an application with this court seeking permission

to appeal. The application may not be granted “unless it appears that the trial court

abused its discretion in denying the motion.” Id. 
2

The reopening of a post-conviction case is allowed in very limited

situations. There must be either a new constitutional right established with

retrospective application to the petitioner’s case, new scientific evidence that

establishes the petitioner’s actual innocence, or the invalidation of a prior conviction

that was used to enhance the petitioner’s sentence. T.C.A. § 40-30-217(a)(1)-(3). The

petitioner alleges none of these in this case. In this respect, even though his convicting

case counsel’s affidavit supports the petitioner’s claim that the state agreed not to

oppose parole, such a claim does not constitute grounds to reopen his previous postconviction case. Also, a claim of ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel

relative to the post-conviction case being dismissed does not provide the petitioner an

avenue of relief. See House v. State, 911 S.W.2d 705, 714 (Tenn. 1995). 

We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to

reopen the petitioner’s post-conviction case. In consideration of the foregoing, it is

hereby ORDERED as follows:

(1) The Motion for Consideration of Post-Judgment Facts is denied.

(2) Permission to appeal is denied.

(3) The costs of this cause are taxed against the state.

____________________________

Joseph M. Tipton, Judge 

CONCUR:

_________________________

John H. Peay, Judge 

_________________________

David G. Hayes, Judge
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 136 (Friday, July 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17039]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Amended 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, July 
30, 2009, 2 p.m. to July 30, 2009, 4:30 p.m., NIEHS/National Institutes 
of Health, Keystone Building, 530 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, 
NC 27709 which was published in the Federal Register on July 2, 2009, 
FR E9-15689.
    The meeting date was changed from July 30, 2009 to August 12, 2009 
and the meeting time was changed from 2 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. The meeting 
is closed to the public.

    Dated: July 9, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-17039 Filed 7-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7606

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LORENZO WHITE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.

(CR-94-229-A, CA-97-793-AM)

Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lorenzo White, Appellant Pro Se. Robert William Wiechering, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)

and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. White, Nos. CR-94-229-A; CA-97-793-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 2,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED