alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PRIMEDIA Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert J. Sforzo, Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|/s/ROBERT J. SFORZORobert J. Sforzo
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                                                   |  | 
|May 10, 2005                                                                                       |  | 

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                         Vally Community Bancshares,Inc.

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Joseph E. Riordan, the Chief Financial Officer of Valley Community
Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company"),  hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.   the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended  December  31,  2002 (the
     "Form 10-K"), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.   the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 3, 2003

                                       By /s/ Joseph E. Riordan
                                          --------------------------
                                       Joseph E. Riordan
                                       Executive Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer

                                       17
Case 2:11-cv-03941-ES-CLW Document 12 Filed 02/17/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 79
#### Romaldo GARCIA-GARCIA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 12-70179.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2012.*

Filed Dec. 21, 2012.

Romaldo Garcia-Garcia, pro se.

Dalin Riley Holyoak, Esquire, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, OIL, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of The Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Romaldo Garcia-Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing de novo questions of law, *Cabantac v. Holder,*693 F.3d 825, 826 (9th Cir.2012) (per curiam), we deny the petition for review.

The agency correctly concluded that Garcia-Garcia was statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal due to his conviction for possession of a controlled substance in violation of section 11377(a) of the California Health and Safety Code, *see Esquivel-Garcia v. Holder,*593 F.3d 1025, 1028 (9th Cir.2010) (observing that a conviction for a controlled-substance violation renders an alien statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal), because a modified categorical analysis of the criminal complaint, read in conjunction with the transcript of his plea hearing, establishes that Garcia-Garcia’s conviction relates to the federally controlled substance of methamphetamine, *see Cabantac,*693 F.3d at 826 (concluding that a petitioner had suffered a conviction for a controlled-substance violation where judicially noticeable *685documents indicated that he had pled guilty to possession of methamphetamine).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Phyliss Russano, Appellant.

[855 NYS2d 410]

No opinion. Spolzino, J.P., Florio, Covello and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
PACTS #: 58243

Name of Sentencing Judicial Officer: THE HONORA BLE ESTFIER SALAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Date of Original Sentence: 11/10/2014

Original Offense: False statements to Medicare

Original Sentence: 36 Months Probation

Special Conditions: Six Months Location Monitoring, Cooperation with Immigration and Customs

Enforcement. New Debt Restrictions, Self-Employment/Business Disclosure, Occupational Restrictions,

$100 Special Assessment. and $195,602 in Restitution

Type of Supervision: Probation Date Supervision Commenced: 11/10/2014

STATUS REPORT

We believe that Mr. Ejere has paid the court-ordered restitution to the best of his financial

ability. To date, he has paid $4,650 towards his restitution. It should be noted that should his

term of supervision expire as scheduled, his case will be referred to the U.S. Attorney’s 0111cc.

Financial LitiQation Linit. for the collection of any uncollected criminal monetary penalties.

Recommendation: It is respectfully requested that Your Honor take no further action and allow

Mr. Ejere’s term of supervision to expire as scheduled on November 9, 2017.

Respectfully submitted,

Riefiette Skd’zi&

By:Michelle Siedzik

U.S. Probation Officer Assistant

Date: 08/25/20 17
Other

ignaIure of&tidicial Offi r
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 131 (Friday, July 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16399]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD


Notice of Release of Exposure Draft on Accounting for Federal Oil 
and Gas Resources

AGENCY: Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Board Action: Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules of 
Procedure, as amended in April, 2004, notice is hereby given that the 
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has released the 
Exposure Draft on Accounting for Federal Oil and Gas Resources.
    The exposure draft proposes standards that would result in 
recognition of the estimated value of royalties from Federal oil and 
gas leases and changes in those values over time as well as the amount 
of royalties designated for distribution to non-Federal entities such 
as State governments. The Exposure Draft is available on the FASAB home 
page http://www.fasab.gov/exposure.html. Copies can be obtained by 
contacting FASAB at (202) 512-7350.
    Respondents are encouraged to comment on any part of the exposure 
draft. Written comments are requested by September 8, 2009, and should 
be sent to: Wendy M. Payne, Executive Director, Federal Accounting 
Standards Advisory Board, 441 G Street, NW., Suite 6814, Mail Stop 
6K17V, Washington, DC 20548.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wendy Payne, Executive Director, at 
(202) 512-7350.

    Authority:  Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463.

    Dated: July 7, 2009.
Charles Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-16399 Filed 7-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-01-P
#### FOUNDRY EQUIPMENT CO. v. CARL-MAYER CORPORATION et al.

Civ. No. 26952.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

March 27, 1950.

John F. Oberlin, Lawrence C. Spieth, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Vern L. Oldham, Cleveland, Ohio, B. C. Boer, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants.

JONES, Chief Judge.

This is a patent infringement action. Defendants have answered and have set up two counterclaims based on patent infringement, unfair trade practices and monopolistic trade practices.

Plaintiff moves to strike the counterclaims because (1) neither action arises out of the subject matter of the complaint, (2) misjoinder of federal and nonfederal causes, and (3) the asserted causes do not rest on substantially identical facts.

Defendant in a patent infringement suit has the right to counterclaim for patent infringement by plaintiff of defendant’s patents. This is true even if the patent which is the subject of the counterclaim is not related to the patent which is the sub*201ject of the complaint. General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co., 287 U.S. 430, 53 S.Ct. 202, 77 L.Ed. 408; Leman v. Krent-ler-Arnold, 284 U.S. 448, 52 S.Ct. 238, 76 L.Ed. 389; Hauserman Co. v. Wright Metal, D.C., 1 F.Supp. 43; Michigan Tool Co. v. Drummond, D.C.Cir., 33 F.Supp. 540.

Plaintiff has cited some authority which in effect holds that a plaintiff cannot join an unrelated nonfederal cause with a federal cause. French Renovating Co. v. Ray Renovating Co., 6 Cir., 170 F.2d 945. It is not clear that this case applied to the counterclaims of the defendant. It is, however, sufficient to state that, if the unfair trade practices of the plaintiff are non-federal claims, they relate to the misuse of plaintiff’s federal patent, and are therefore sufficiently related to the federal cause to give this court jurisdiction under the French ruling.

Finally, counterclaims in a patent infringement action which raise the issue of plaintiff’s monopolistic practices have been approved by various courts. Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Inv. Co., 320 U.S. 661, 64 S.Ct. 268, 88 L.Ed. 376; Hancock Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Co., 9 Cir., 115 F. 2d 45.

The plaintiff’s motions to strike will be overruled, and leave given to file a reply within the time limit set by Rule 12(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A.
Exhibit 12.2



I, Thomas Hui, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of GigaMedia Limited (the Company);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.



5. The Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Companys auditors and the audit committee of Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: June 30, 2005



|      |  |                        
|----- |  | -----------------------
|      |  | /s/  THOMAS HUI        
|Name: |  | THOMAS HUI             
|Title |  | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PAUL J. FISHMAN

United States Attorney

JORDAN M. ANGER

Assistant U.S. Attorney

970 Broad Street, Room 701

Newark, NJ 07102

(973) 645-645-2829

J1V1A2859

FLU:KCPB

UNITED STA TES DISTRICT CoURT

DISTRICT OF NEWJERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Hon. Jose L. Linares

Plaintiff

v. CRIMINALNo. 11-473

SWISS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

GARNISHEE ORDER

Defendant.

and

PNC BANK,

and its successors or assigns,

Garnishee.

An Application and Order for Writ of Garnishment was filed by the United States of

America. and a Writ of Garnishment directed to Garnishee was duly issued. The Garnishee

waived service ofthe Writ of Garnishment by United States Marshal and accepted service by

federal express mail. Pursuant to the Writ of Garnishment, the Garnishee has filed an Answer to

the Writ stating that at the time of the service of the Writ he had in his possession, custody or

under his control, personal property belonging to and due defendant, and that garnishee was
indebted to defendant in the sum of $6.372.03.

IT IS ORDERED that the garnishee liquidate the defendant’s account so that it may be

applied to the defendant’s financial obligation to the United States of America.

DATED: I

H9/JOSE TLINARES, JUDGE

> TED STATES DISTRICT COURT
#### In re Christoph GESKES.

No. 2012-1390.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 19, 2013.

Mark B. Harrison, Venable, LLP, of Washington, DC, for appellant. With him on the brief was Michael E. Hall.

Raymond T. Chen, Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, for appellee. With him on the brief were Thomas L. Casag-rande and Christina J. Hieber, Associate Solicitors.

NEWMAN, PLAGER, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit
No. 32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Juhl Wind, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), on Form 10Q for the quarter ended June  30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, the Principal Financial Officer, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the undersigned’s
knowledge:





(1)   the
Report of the Company filed today fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





Date:  August
      14, 2009
            
            /s/ John J. BrandJohn
      J. BrandChief
      Financial Officer
# cpsaat16
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Robert A. Rich, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of American Uranium
      Corporation for the quarter ended August 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of American Uranium Corporation.                                                                    

Dated: October 19, 2007

|/s/ Robert A. Rich                              | 
|----------------------------------------------- | 
|Robert A. Rich,                                 | 
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | 
|(Principal Executive Officer)                   | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to American Uranium
Corporation and will be retained by American Uranium Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-10230

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 11, 2012.

Anne Ruth Schultz, Wifredo A. Ferrer, Chad E. Kauffman, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, Brandy Brentari Galler, U.S. Attorney’s Office, West Palm Beach, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Richard L. Rosenbaum, Arnstein & Lehr, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Richard L. Rosenbaum, appointed appellate counsel for Patrick Campbell in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and *882Campbell’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zevotek, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Babkie, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May 16, 2011





/s/ Robert BabkieRobert Babkie, President, Chief Executive Officer,

Chief Financial Officer and Director

(Principal Executive and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CYBRA Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harold Brand, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: May 14, 2009                                                              /s/ Harold Brand


Harold Brand


Interim Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:11-mj-08131-MCA Document 1 Filed 07/13/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1
Case 2:11-mj-08131-MCA Document 1 Filed 07/13/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5428 

To amend the Federal Charter of the Boy Scouts of America in title 36, 

United States Code, to ratify the authority of the Secretary of Defense 

and military installations and units of the Armed Forces to officially 

sponsor units of the Boy Scouts of America serving dependents of members of the Armed Forces and to make facilities of the Department 

of Defense available for Boy Scout meetings and activities, such as 

national and world Boy Scout Jamborees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2004 

Mr. DINGELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Charter of the Boy Scouts of America 

in title 36, United States Code, to ratify the authority 

of the Secretary of Defense and military installations 

and units of the Armed Forces to officially sponsor units 

of the Boy Scouts of America serving dependents of 

members of the Armed Forces and to make facilities 

of the Department of Defense available for Boy Scout 

meetings and activities, such as national and world Boy 

Scout Jamborees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

2 

•HR 5428 IH 

1 SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SPONSORSHIP AND 

2 SUPPORT FOR BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA. 

3 Section 30904 of title 36, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following new sub5 section: 

6 ‘‘(c) FEDERAL SUPPORT.—The Secretary of Defense, 

7 and military installations and units of the Armed Forces 

8 under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense, may 

9 support the corporation by officially sponsoring units of 

10 the Boy Scouts of America serving dependents of members 

11 of the Armed Forces and by making facilities of the De12 partment of Defense available for the meetings of such 

13 Boy Scout units and for other Boy Scout activities, such 

14 as national and world Boy Scout Jamborees.’’. 

Æ