alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000884504
<NAME> THERMOENERGY CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         411,275
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               411,275
<PP&E>                                          19,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 994,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,078,539
<BONDS>                                      1,737,631
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,607
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,825,256)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   994,521
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  420,649
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              56,452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (173,737)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (173,737)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 2099

CHRISTIANA TRUST, a division of Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, not in its individual capacity, but solely as owner trustee on behalf of RBSHD 2013

- 1
Trust,

Plaintiff

– Appellee,

and

BANK OF AMERICA, NA

,

Plaintiff,

v.

JULIETT MARSH

- DAVIS

,

Defendant

– Appellant,

and

CORNELL D. DAVIS; AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK; CARRIAGE LANE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC.,

Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at
Charleston

. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 2:17

- cv

- 01502

- RMG )

Submitted : December 21 , 2017 Decided: December 27, 20172 Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Juliett Marsh

- Davis, Appellant Pro Se. William Price Stork, SCOTT & CORLEY, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Juliett Marsh

- Davis has noted an appeal from the district court’ s order adopting the

magistrate judge’s report and recommen dation, granting the Plaintiff’s motion to remand,

and remanding a removed foreclosure act ion to South Carolina state court . Pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2012), an order remanding a case from which it was removed is not

reviewable on appeal. The district court remanded Marsh

- Davis’ removed action for lack

of subject matter jurisdiction. Because the district court remanded the action for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction, we lack jurisdiction to review the order. Accordingly, we grant

the Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09** 
**- 2185** 

CHRISTOPHER H. GORDON ,
Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
and

BREWER K. THOMPSON,
Plaintiff,

v.

KYLE L. DONIFF; EDWARD PRIMOFF; SLOCUM & BODDIE PC; ALIAREZA ALIASKARI; DARIA LAND GROUP LLC; ROBERT H. HILLMAN; MAGAZINE & HILLMAN PC; SHEA HICKMAN, Tenants; SUZANNE GORDON, Tenants; RICHARD FRANK BODDIE ,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Roger W. Titus , District Judge. ( 8:08

- cv
- 02802

- RWT )

Submitted : May 2 0 , 2010 Decided: May 24, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Christopher H. Gordon, Appellant Pro Se. R ichard Frank Boddie , SLOCUM & BODDIE, PC, Springfield, Virginia; Robert H. Hillman, MAGAZINE & HILLMAN, PC, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees;2 Suzanne Gordon, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Christopher H. Gordon appeals the district court ’ s

order dismissing his civil complaint for failure to state a

claim . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Gordon v. Doniff , No. 8:08

- cv
- 02802

- RWT (D. Md.
Sept. 10, 2009) . We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 10.1**

**OCCUPANCY AGREEMENT**

           This AGREEMENT  (the “Agreement”), effective as of January 1, 2009 (the “Effective  Date”), between Mattmar Minerals, Inc. (the “Corporation”),  a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware and Kirk M.  Warshaw, LLC (the  "LLC"), a limited liability company organized  under the laws of the State of New Jersey.  

           WHEREAS, the Corporation’s principal offices are located at 47 School  Avenue, Chatham, New Jersey and such premises are owned by the LLC (the “Principal  Offices”); and

           WHEREAS, the Corporation and the LLC wishes to enter into an agreement for  use and occupancy of the Principal Offices and certain administrative services;

           NOW, THEREFORE,  for good and valuable consideration, it is agreed that:

1.        Effective  as of the Effective Date, the Corporation hereby agrees that it shall pay to  the LLC a quarterly occupancy and administrative services fee in the amount  of U.S. five hundred dollars ($500) (the “Fee”) on  each of June 1st, September 1st, December 1st and March 1st until such time  as this Agreement is terminated by written notice of either party.

2.        The Fee  for the fiscal quarter beginning on December 1, 2008 shall be prorated as of  the Effective Date through the remainder of the quarter.

            IN  WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed and delivered this Agreement  effective as of the Effective Date on January 29, 2009.

 

**MATTMAR MINERALS, INC.,    a Delaware corporation**
| By:    |   /s/          Arnold P. Kling                        |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Arnold P. Kling        Title:    President |

**Kirk M. Warshaw, LLC.,    a New Jersey limited liability company**
| By:    |   /s/          Kirk Warshaw            |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Kirk Warshaw        Title: Managing Member |

 

 

----
Exhibit
32.1





Written
Statement of the Principal Executive Officer & Principal Financial
Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350







In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended October 31, 2009 (the “Report”) by Westergaard.Com, Inc. ("Registrant"),
the undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.








Date: 
January 22, 2010





/s/  Anne
Straton


Anne
Straton


Principal
Executive Officer & Principal Financial Officer





A
signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has
been provided to Westergaard.Com, Inc and will be retained by Westergaard.Com,
Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
2012 OGE 10-K - Ex. 10.38






Exhibit 10.38


OGE Energy Corp.
Director Compensation

Compensation of non-officer directors of the Company in 2012 included an annual retainer fee of $128,600, of which $45,600 was payable in cash in monthly installments and $83,000 was deposited in the director's account under the Company's Deferred Compensation Plan in December 2012 and converted to 1,460.239 common stock units based on the closing price of the Company's Common Stock on December 3, 2012. All non-officer directors received $2,000 for each Board meeting and $2,000 for each committee meeting attended. The lead director received an additional $15,000 cash retainer in 2012. The chairman of the Audit Committee received an additional $10,000 cash retainer in 2012.  The chairmen of the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees received an additional $5,000 annual cash retainer in 2012. Each chairman of a board committee also received a meeting fee of $2,000 for each meeting (either in person or by phone) with management to address committee matters. Each member of the Audit Committee also received an additional annual retainer of $5,000. These amounts represent the total fees paid to directors in their capacities as directors of the Company and OG&E in 2012. 


Under the Company's Deferred Compensation Plan, non-officer directors may defer payment of all or part of their attendance fees and the cash portion of their annual retainer fee, which deferred amounts are credited to their account as of the first day of the month in which the deferred amounts otherwise would have been paid.  Amounts credited to the accounts are assumed to be invested in one or more of the investment options permitted under the Company's Deferred Compensation Plan. In 2012, those investment options included a Company Common Stock fund, whose value was determined based on the stock price of the Company's Common Stock, and various money market, bond and equity funds.  When an individual ceases to be a director of the Company, all amounts credited under the Company's Deferred Compensation Plan are paid in cash in a lump sum or installments. In certain circumstances, participants may also be entitled to in-service withdrawals from the Company's Deferred Compensation Plan.



In November 2012, the Compensation Committee met to consider director compensation.  At that meeting, the Compensation Committee increased the additional annual retainer for the chairmen of the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees for 2013 to $7,500 from $5,000, increased the additional annual retainer for the chairman of the Audit Committee for 2013 to $12,500 from $10,000 and increased the additional annual retainer for the lead director for 2013 to $17,500 from $15,000.  At that meeting, the Compensation Committee also increased the portion of the annual retainer payable in December 2012 and deposited in the director's account under the Company's Deferred Compensation Plan for 2012 to $83,000 from $73,000. The other components of director compensation remained unchanged.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-36464, No. 333-107957 and No.333-117958) of our report dated April 21, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, of Embarcadero Technologies, Inc., which appears in this Form 10-K/A. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Jose, California 

April 21, 2005
Case 3:10-cr-00692-PGS Document 18 Filed 11/03/10 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 52
Case 3:10-cr-00692-PGS Document 18 Filed 11/03/10 Page 2 of 8 PageID: 53
Case 3:10-cr-00692-PGS Document 18 Filed 11/03/10 Page 3 of 8 PageID: 54
Case 3:10-cr-00692-PGS Document 18 Filed 11/03/10 Page 4 of 8 PageID: 55
Case 3:10-cr-00692-PGS Document 18 Filed 11/03/10 Page 5 of 8 PageID: 56
Case 3:10-cr-00692-PGS Document 18 Filed 11/03/10 Page 6 of 8 PageID: 57
Case 3:10-cr-00692-PGS Document 18 Filed 11/03/10 Page 7 of 8 PageID: 58
Case 3:10-cr-00692-PGS Document 18 Filed 11/03/10 Page 8 of 8 PageID: 59
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:

Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-2955. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at                     *http://www.federalreserve.gov*                     for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting.                

Dated: July 10, 2009. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

 [FR Doc. E9-16843 Filed 7-10-09; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM LOPEZ-ROMERO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-72464

Agency No. A098-854-646

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 21, 2012** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

William Lopez-Romero, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision denying his motion to

reopen removal proceedings. 

FILED

FEB 22 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-72464

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Lopez-Romrero’s motion to

reopen because it was untimely, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). Lopez-Romero

failed to demonstrate changed country conditions to qualify for the regulatory

exception to the time limit, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii). Finally, Lopez-Romero

did not show prima facie eligibility for the relief sought, see Ochave v. INS, 254

F.3d 859, 865 (9th Cir. 2001) (asylum is not available to victims of violence unless

they are singled out on account of a protected ground).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.1 / 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coronado Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Floricel Leiton, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.   /s/ Floricel LeitonName:
Floricel LeitonTitle:
Chief Executive and Financial OfficerDate:
November 13, 2009
Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 1 of 22 PageID: 1036

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 2 of 22 PageID: 1037

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 3 of 22 PageID: 1038

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 4 of 22 PageID: 1039

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 5 of 22 PageID: 1040

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 6 of 22 PageID: 1041

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 7 of 22 PageID: 1042

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 8 of 22 PageID: 1043

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 9 of 22 PageID: 1044

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 10 of 22 PageID: 1045

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 11 of 22 PageID: 1046

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 12 of 22 PageID: 1047

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 13 of 22 PageID: 1048

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 14 of 22 PageID: 1049

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 15 of 22 PageID: 1050

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 16 of 22 PageID: 1051

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 17 of 22 PageID: 1052

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 18 of 22 PageID: 1053

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 19 of 22 PageID: 1054

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 20 of 22 PageID: 1055

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 21 of 22 PageID: 1056

Case 3:04-cv-03530-PGS-DEA   Document 103-1   Filed 03/01/11   Page 22 of 22 PageID: 1057
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA H Hon. Faith S. Hochberg
v. : Crim. No. 11-472
AL-SHABAZ2Z HINTON : ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE

This matter having come before the Court on the joint
application of Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the
District of New Jersey (by Mary E. Toscano, Special Assistant
U.S. Attorney), and defendant AL-SHABAZZ HINTON (by K. Anthony
Thomas, Assistant Federal Public Defender), for an order granting
a continuance of the proceedings in the above-captioned matter,
and the defendant being aware that he has the right to have the
Matter brought to trial within 70 days of the date of his
appearance before a judicial officer of this court pursuant to
Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 3161(c) (1), and two
continuances having previously been approved by the Court in this
matter, and as the defendant has consented to such a continuance,
and for good and sufficient cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should
be continued for the following reasons:

(1) The parties request an opportunity for sufficient
time to review the evidence and engage in plea negotiations,
which would render any subsequent trial of this matter

unnecessary;


(2) Taking into account the exercise of diligence,
therefore, the facts of this case require that defense counsel be
permitted a reasonable amount of additional time to review the
evidence with the defendant, and should plea negotiations fail,
time for effective trial preparation in this matter.

(3) As a result of the foregoing, pursuant to Title 18,
United States Code, Section 3161(h) (7), the ends of justice
served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interest of
the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS, therefore, on this \@TM day of December, 2011,

ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, continued
for a period of 60 days from December 23, 2011 to February 20,
2012; and it is further :

ORDERED that the period from December 23, 2011 through
February 20, 2012 shall be excludable in computing time under the
Speedy Trial Act of 1974.

[BERG
rict

-2-


Form and entry
consented to:

btu E Tac si ep pes

Mary E.” Toscano 7
Special Assista tr

.S. Attorney

HvAthony hmas
Assistant #ederal Public Defender
Counsel fef defendant AL~SHABAZ2Z
#### Richard F. Olsen, Appellant, v William L. Evers et al., Respondents.

[852 NYS2d 801]

On October 25, 1998 Georgia Lane was admitted to the hospital with a history of confusion and memory loss. At various times over the next eight days, the 78-year-old Lane was unable to correctly recall the current President, the names of her dogs, or the month. Five minutes after being told she likely suffered a stroke, she could not recall the conversation. An MRI revealed Lane had suffered an “acute infarct anterior thalamus” and her doctors diagnosed her with “severe anterograde amne*616sia.” On November 2, 1998 Lane was discharged from the hospital to the care of the plaintiff. At the time, her doctors indicated she would require 24-hour a day assistance. Three days later, Lane executed a deed and a second document conveying, allegedly as gifts, her home and all her personal property located therein to the plaintiff. The following day the plaintiff sought to retain the services of two attorneys for the purpose of recording the deed. After the attorneys spoke with Lane alone, they concluded that she was confused and did not understand what she was doing. As a result, they refused to record the deed for the plaintiff.

Based on the foregoing, the defendants, William L. Evers, as executor of Lane’s estate, and Steven Kretz, one of the attorneys who refused to record the deed for the plaintiff, satisfied their burden of proving that Lane was incompetent at the time she executed the subject documents *(see Crawn v Sayah,*31 AD3d 367, 368 [2006]; *Schlage v Barrett,*259 AD2d 691 [1999]; *Smith v Comas,*173 AD2d 535 [1991]; *Feiden v Feiden,*151 AD2d 889, 890 [1989]). Thus, the Supreme Court properly entered judgment in favor of the defendants declaring the deed null and void and dismissing the complaint.

The plaintiffs remaining contention is without merit. Lifson, J.P., Ritter, Florio and Garni, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

ISRAEL ORTIZ, 

Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

:

:

:

: ORDER

:

: Crim. No. 11-475 (WHW)

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Walls, Senior District Judge

It is, on this 26th day of September, 2012:

ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to vacate his conviction under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 or 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 is denied.

/s/ William H. Walls

United States Senior District Judge