alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 17. Median usual weekly earnings of full-time wage and 

salary workers 25 years and over by educational attainment 

and sex, 2008 annual averages

Total, both sexes

Total................................................. 96,027 $761

 Less than a high school diploma ............ 8,120 453

 High school graduate or more1

............. 87,907 800

 High school graduates, no college1

...... 27,392 618

 Some college or associate degree......... 26,526 722

 Some college, no degree................... 16,522 699

 Associate degree............................ 10,004 757

 Occupational program..................... 4,541 750

 Academic program......................... 5,463 762

 College graduates, total..................... 33,990 1,115

 Bachelor's degree............................ 22,033 1,012

 Master's degree.............................. 8,881 1,233

 Professional degree......................... 1,620 1,531

 Doctoral degree.............................. 1,455 1,561

Women

Total.................................................. 42,584 670

 Less than a high school diploma............ 2,566 378

 High school graduate or more1............. 40,018 697

 High school graduates, no college1

...... 11,451 520

 Some college or associate degree......... 12,756 628

 Some college, no degree................... 7,713 611

 Associate degree............................ 5,043 661

 Occupational program..................... 2,121 639

 Academic program......................... 2,922 676

 College graduates, total..................... 15,812 955

 Bachelor's degree........................... 10,202 878

 Master's degree.............................. 4,476 1,074

 Professional degree......................... 629 1,258

 Doctoral degree................................ 504 1,352

 Educational attainment and sex Total employed 

(in thousands)

Median weekly 

earnings

53
Table 17. Median usual weekly earnings of full-time wage and

salary workers 25 years and over by educational attainment

and sex, 2008 annual averages—Continued

Men

Total................................................. 53,444 $857

 Less than a high school diploma............ 5,554 497

 High school graduate or more1............. 47,889 913

 High school graduates, no college1

...... 15,941 709

 Some college or associate degree......... 13,770 830

 Some college, no degree................... 8,809 803

 Associate degree............................ 4,961 883

 Occupational program..................... 2,420 871

 Academic program......................... 2,541 896

 College graduates, total..................... 18,178 1,285

 Bachelor's degree............................ 11,831 1,172

 Master's degree.............................. 4,405 1,442

 Professional degree........................... 991 1,758

 Doctoral degree............................... 951 1,736

Educational attainment and sex Total employed 

(in thousands)

Median weekly 

earnings

 1 Includes persons with a high school diploma or equivalent.

 SOURCE: Current Population Survey, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. 

Bureau of Labor Statistics.

54
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1216 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 

depreciation rules for property used predominantly within an Indian 

reservation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 11, 2019 

Mr. INHOFE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

extend the depreciation rules for property used predominantly within an Indian reservation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF DEPRECIATION 

4 RULES FOR PROPERTY ON INDIAN RESERVA5 TIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (j) of section 168 of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

8 paragraph (9). 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1216 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

3 December 31, 2017. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### Rucker *v.*The State.

Simmons, J. — An indictment for larceny after trust, which charges that a person unknown, a passenger on board a car, entrusted a ticket to the accused to be applied to the use of the railroad company to whom it belonged after being so entrusted, is not supported by evidence that the accused received the ticket from the passenger in the course of his duty as porter on the car, his further duty to the company being to turn over the ticket to the conductor, which he failed to do but fraudulently converted it to his own use. The trust proved was not one between the passenger and the accused, but one between the railroad company and the latter, inasmuch as the passenger acted for himself and not for the company in delivering the ticket to the porter, and by such delivery discharged himself from all liability to the company for the carriage to which the ticket related, the same as if the ticket had been surrendered directly to the conductor or any other agent or officer authorized to receive it in behalf of the company. *MeNish*v. *The State,*88 *Ga.*499.

October 15, 1894.

Indictment for larceny after trust. Before Judge ■Clark. Pulton superior court. March term, 1894.

P. R. Walker and G. P. Roberts, for plaintiff in error.

C. D. Hill, solicitor-general, and IIillyer, Alexander & Lambdin, *contra.*

*Judgment reversed.*
- - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

ASTRAZENECA AB, AKTIEBOLAGET 

HÄSSLE, ASTRAZENECA LP, KBI INC., 

and KBI-E INC., 

Plaintiffs and 

Counterclaim-Defendants,

 v. 

HANMI USA, INC., HANMI 

PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., HANMI 

FINE CHEMICAL CO., LTD, and HANMI 

HOLDINGS CO., LTD., 

 

Defendants and 

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs. 

Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00760-JAP-TJB 

Judge Joel A. Pisano 

Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni 

DECLARATION OF PATRICK L. CHEN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ BRIEF IN IN 

OPPOSITION TO HANMI’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 5 (TO PRECLUDE 

TESTIMONY OF DR. PAUL BARTLETT AS TO THE STATE OF THE ART 

REGARDING GASTRIC ACID RELATED DISEASES) 

I, Patrick L. Chen, hereby declare as follows, 

1. I am an associate at the law firm of Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, 1290 

Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10104-3800, counsel for Plaintiffs AstraZeneca

AB, Aktiebolaget Hässle, AstraZeneca LP, KBI Inc., and KBI-E Inc. in connection with the 

present action. 

2. I make this Declaration on my personal knowledge in support of Plaintiffs’ Brief 

in Opposition to Hanmi’s Motion in limine No. 5 (To Preclude Testimony of Dr. Paul Bartlett as 

to the State of the Art Regarding Gastric Acid Related Diseases). 

3. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the March 25, 2013 Rebuttal 

Report of Paul A. Bartlett on Validity. 

4. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of Dr. Bartlett’s CV. 

Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB Document 314 Filed 05/06/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 13449
- - 2

5. Attached as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of the April 17, 2013 deposition 

of Dr. Paul A. Bartlett. 

6. Attached as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of the March 25, 2013 Rebuttal 

Report of Dr. David A. Johnson on Validity. 

7. Attached as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of the March 25, 2013 Expert 

Rebuttal Report of René H. Levy, Ph.D. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: May 6, 2013 

Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB Document 314 Filed 05/06/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 13450
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Docket ID: DOD-2009-OS-0107]

# AGENCY:

Defense Information Systems Agency, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice to delete a system of records.

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Information Systems Agency is deleting a system of records notice in its existing inventory of records systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

# DATES:

This proposed action will be effective without further notice on August 21, 2009 unless comments are received which result in a contrary determination.

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to the Defense Information Systems Agency, 5600 Columbia Pike, Room 933-I, Falls Church, VA 22041-2705.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Jeanette M. Weathers-Jenkins at (703) 681-2103.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Defense Information Systems Agency systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and are available from the address above.                

The Defense Information Systems Agency is proposing to delete a system of records notice in its existing inventory of records systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or altered system report.

Dated: July 16, 2009.

Morgan E. Frazier,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

*Deletion:*

## KEUR.02

DISA Form 605, Personnel Data Sheet (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10562).

*Reason:*                     System form is no longer in DISA publication inventory and therefore should not be maintained. All information previously retained in the DISA Form 605 is currently maintained under KEUR 010, Personnel File (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10562).                

[FR Doc. E9-17297 Filed 7-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
[No. 23584-0-III.

Division Three.

December 20, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Burton Robert Funk, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 04-1-02447-2, Tari S. Eitzen, J., entered November 16, 2004. *Reversed with instructions*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, A.C.J., concurred in by Schultheis and Brown, JJ.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129819 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129819 

 COA: 261831 

Saginaw CC: 01-020508-FC 

JIMMY FELTON MORGAN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
# 2019

# 2020
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5089 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5089

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,2'-[(3,3'-Dichloro[1,1'-biphenyl]-
    4,4'-diyl)bis(azo)]bis[N -(2,4-dimethylphenyl)-3-oxobutyramide] 
         Butanamide, 2,2'-[(3,3'-dichloro[1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-
           diyl)bis(azo)]bis[N -(2,4-dimethylphenyl)-3-oxo-.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 15, 2004

  Mr. Berry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,2'-[(3,3'-Dichloro[1,1'-biphenyl]-
    4,4'-diyl)bis(azo)]bis[N -(2,4-dimethylphenyl)-3-oxobutyramide] 
         Butanamide, 2,2'-[(3,3'-dichloro[1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-
           diyl)bis(azo)]bis[N -(2,4-dimethylphenyl)-3-oxo-.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 2,2'-[(3,3'-DICHLORO[1,1'-BIPHENYL]-
              4,4'-DIYL)BIS(AZO)]BIS[N-(2,4-DIMETHYLPHENYL)-3-
              OXOBUTYRAMIDE] BUTANAMIDE, 2,2'-[(3,3'-DICHLORO[1,1'-
              BIPHENYL]-4,4'-DIYL)BIS(AZO)]BIS[N-(2,4-DIMETHYLPHENYL)-
              3-OXO-.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following:

``      9902.35.12       2,2-[(3,3-         Free         No Change        No Change        On or Before 12/  ''.
                         Dichloro[1,1-                                                      31/2007
                         biphenyl]-4,4-
                         diyl)bis(azo)]bis
                         [N-(2,4-
                         dimethylphenyl)-3-
                         oxobutyramide]
                         Butanamide, 2,2-
                         [(3,3-
                         dichloro[1,1-
                         biphenyl]-4,4-
                         diyl)bis(azo)]bis
                         [N-(2,4-
                         dimethylphenyl)-3-
                         oxo- (CAS No.
                         5102-83-0)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3204.17.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Lewis Finfrock v. Jacob Ungeheuer.

*No.*315.

1. Practice, District *Court*— New *Trial*— Newly *Discovered Evidence.*On the hearing of a motion for a new trial under our statutes on the ground of newly discovered evidence, the questions to be considered are whether the evidence is newly discovered and material, or merely cumulative, and whether diligence has been exercised in its discovery.

2. Practice, Courts or Appeals— *Evidence not Contained in Reoord.*Where there is no evidence contained in the record, we are unable to determine whether the alleged newly-discovered evidence is cumulative.

Error from Linn district court; J. S. West, judge.-

Opinion filed September 22, 1898.

Affirmed.

*John O. Gannon,*for plaintiff in error.

*John TV. Poore,*for defendant in error.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dennison, P. J.:

This action was commenced in the district court of Linn county by the defendant in error to recover a judgment against the plaintiff in error on a promissory note and to foreclose a real estate mortgage given by plaintiff in error to secure the payment of the note. The answer of the defendant in the court below alleged payment to Robert Kincaid as the agent of the plaintiff below. An application for a continuance was overruled, and the case went to trial before a jury. The court sustained a demurrer to the evidence introduced by the defendant below on the ground that no agency had been established. A motion was filed asking for a new trial for the following causes : (1) Accident and surprise which ordinary precaution could not have guarded against; and *482(2) newly discovered evidence material for the party applying, which he could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced at the trial. To sustain this motion, the affidavit of James Tyrer was filed, tending to show that he was present when Kincaid turned over to the plaintiff $175 which he had collected from the defendant on the note in controversy. None of the evidence is in the case-made.

The petition in error alleges that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. No other error is complained of. There is no argument on the question of accident or surprise and we are not informed as to the nature of the accident or the cause of the surprise. The .only question presented is the question of newly-discovered evidence. On the hearing of a motion for a new trial under our statutes on the ground of newly-discovered evidence, the questions to be considered are whether the evidence is newly-discovered and material, or merely cumulative, and whether diligence has been exercised in its discovery. On the question whether the evidence was newly-discovered and was material, we are inclined to hold in favor of the plaintiff in error. We cannot, however, say that the plaintiff in error made such a showing of reasonable diligence that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial, and we do not know of any way of determining whether the evidence is cumulative, for the reason that none of it is contained in the record.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, the undersigned Richard N. Snyder, Chief Executive Officer, of Forgent
Networks, Inc. (the Company), certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
Company (the Report);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the periods covered by this Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in the Report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
the Report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
Company and we have (a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within these entities, particularly
during the period in which the Report is being prepared; (b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in the Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by the Report based on such evaluation;
and (c) disclosed in the Report any change in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys
most recent fiscal quarter (the quarter ended April 30, 2004) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over
financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and to the Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors: (a) all significant
deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls. /s/ RICHARD N. SNYDERRichard N. SnyderChief Executive OfficerJune 14, 2004
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 633

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility in Iron Mountain, Michigan, as the ‘‘Oscar G. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2003

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility 

in Iron Mountain, Michigan, as the ‘‘Oscar G. Johnson 

Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

4 MEDICAL FACILITY, IRON MOUNTAIN, MICHI5 GAN. 

6 The Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility 

7 in Iron Mountain, Michigan, shall after the date of the 

8 enactment of this Act be known and designated as the 

9 ‘‘Oscar G. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Med-
2

•HR 633 IH 

1 ical Facility’’. Any reference to that medical facility in any 

2 law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of 

3 the United States shall be considered to be a reference 

4 to the Oscar G. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs 

5 Medical Facility.

Æ
Case 2:11-cr-00554-KSH Document 16 Filed 09/09/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 53
Case 2:11-cr-00554-KSH Document 16 Filed 09/09/11 Page 2 of 8 PageID: 54
Case 2:11-cr-00554-KSH Document 16 Filed 09/09/11 Page 3 of 8 PageID: 55
Case 2:11-cr-00554-KSH Document 16 Filed 09/09/11 Page 4 of 8 PageID: 56
Case 2:11-cr-00554-KSH Document 16 Filed 09/09/11 Page 5 of 8 PageID: 57
Case 2:11-cr-00554-KSH Document 16 Filed 09/09/11 Page 6 of 8 PageID: 58
Case 2:11-cr-00554-KSH Document 16 Filed 09/09/11 Page 7 of 8 PageID: 59
Case 2:11-cr-00554-KSH Document 16 Filed 09/09/11 Page 8 of 8 PageID: 60