alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1



LION BIOSCIENCE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of LION bioscience Aktiengesellschaft (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel Keesman, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2004 and
results of operations of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2004.



/s/ Daniel KeesmanName:

Daniel KeesmanTitle:

Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating OfficerDate:

September 24, 2004
2/13/2015 5:01:42 PM 

,• 

Durkin, Gina M. 

RECEIVED 

FEB 1 7 2015 

AT 8:30 M 

WILLIAM T. WALSH 

CLERK 

YIA ECF & FACSIMILE (609) 989-0451 

The Honorable Douglas E. Arpert, U.S.M.J. 

United States District Court 

Clarkson S. Fisher Building & U.S. Courthouse 

402 East State Street · 

Trenton, NJ 08608 

Saul Ewing Page 3 

.February 13,2015 

Charles M. Lizza 

Phone: (973) 286--671 S 

Fax.: (973) 286-68 IS 

clizza@saul.com 

www.saul.com 

RECEIVED 

FEB I I 2015 

DOUGLAS E. ARPERT 

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

~: Helsinn Healthcare S.A.J et. al. v. Dr. Reddy,s Laboratories} Ltd, et al . 

.. CiYH. .. ~~·No~,·i 1-39~~ (MLC)(J),O:) ow•~ 

Dear Judge Arpert: 

This finn, together with Paul Hastings LLP and Loeb & Loeb LLP, represents Plaintiffs 

Helsinn. Healthcare S .A. and Roche Palo Alto LLC (''Plaintiffs'!') in the above-captioned matter. 

As discussed at the conference \\rith Your Honor this past Wednesday, February 11, 

enclosed is a proposed amended case schedule to which the parties have agreed. If this meets 

with the Your Honor's approval, we respectfWly request that Your Honor sign the below form of 

endorsement and enter the schedule on. the docket. 

Thank you for Your Honor's kind attention to this matter. 

Re~~tfully yours, . 

Cbarles 

~-·"k&iir- M. Lizza . 

cc: AU Counsel (via e-mail) 

IIJ f!: SO ORDERED on this L.L day o~ &2wrf· ~201S. . ... ~ . . ....... ·· ... . 

Hon. Douglas . . rt, U.S.MI 

______ ..........,...~___,_.....,..,.. ,.;;;;.:;····· ... ·.·.··""' ..... ·,.,.;;:;....· _...;,o;.;,;.,;,;,;,.,;.;.;wo-....._.__.......,.. • ...__~ ... '!""" ........................... ~·.·.~·.······~·.·.·.·.~·.··.·.·~· .. '!"""· --~·.·."!':"'· 

Uf:t.A"WA.tl.£ V,;\I.YLAN~ W:AUACBIEYt~!'if'tR ll.~Wl JE.B.~.i£1" ltr'EW YOaK PENNSYLVANIA W.UHIWGTO'N, DC:: 

Case 3:11-cv-03962-MLC-DEA Document 255 Filed 02/17/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 15470
2/13/2015 5:01:44 PM Durkin, Gina M. saul Ewing 

Helsinn et aL v. Dr. Reddy's Labs·. el aL (D.N.J.) 

PrQposed Consolidated 11-03962 /13-05815 Schedule 

2 

Case 3:11-cv-03962-MLC-DEA Document 255 Filed 02/17/15 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 15471 Page 4 
2/13/2015 5:01:46 PM Durkin, Gina M. saul Ewing Page 5 

3 

Case 3:11-cv-03962-MLC-DEA Document 255 Filed 02/17/15 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 15472
EXHIBIT
      32.1


COLLECTIBLE
      CONCEPTS GROUP, INC.


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Collectible Concepts Group, Inc. (the
      Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended February 28, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul
      Lipschutz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Collectible Concepts Group, Inc. and will be retained by Collectible Concepts
      Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.


Date:
                June 13,
                2007/s/ Paul LipschutzPaul
                LipschutzChief Executive Officer
#### Shickle, Harrison & Howard Iron Co. *v.*South St. Louis Foundry Co. and others.1

*(Circuit Court, E. D. Missouri.*

February 7, 1887.)

1. Patents for Inventions—Broadened Reissues—Delay.

A broadened reissue should not be granted after a delay of four years in making application therefor.

2. Same—Infringement.

Letters patent No. 209,428, granted to Frederick Shickle for an improvement in pipe-moulding machines, *held*not infringed by a yoke having its arms connected at their lower ends by means of a rod, and provided at their extreme ends with clips to connect them to the ends of the patterns.

3. Same—Invention.

Letters patent No. 295,205, granted to Frederick Shickle for an improvement in pipe-moulding apparatus, are void for want of patentability.

In Equity.

This is a suit for the infringement of three letters patent granted to Frederick Shickle, viz.: (i) Reissued letters patent No. 8,562, granted January 28, 1879, for an Improvement in Moulding Pipes; (2) letters patent No. 209,428, granted October 29, 1878, for an “Improvement in Pipe-moulding Machines;” (3) letters patent No. 295,205, granted March 18, 1884, for an “Improvement in Pipe-moulding Apparatus.”

*867The claims of-letters patent No. 209,428 are as follows:

“(1) The combination of the flask, B, having the compartments, B7, B7, and the pattern, D, having the parts, *d, d,*united at or near their tops by a yoke, *d',*consisting of two rings and a connecting bar, substantially as described.

“(2) The combination of the flask, B, having the compartments, B, B, and the pattern, D, having the parts, *d, d,*and the yoke, *d',*substantially, as described. ”

The yoke which the complainants contended infringed letters patent No. 209,428 is a bar, bent somewhat in the shape of an inverted “U,” strengthened by a cross-bar, and having the ends of its arms provided with clips, to connect each of them with the ends of a pattern to be lifted.

*Robert H. Parkinson, E. J. O’Brien,*and *T. A. Post,*for complainant.

*Geo. H. Knight*and *H. D. Wood,*for defendants.

1

 Edited by Benj. F. Rex, Esq., of the St. Louis bar.

Treat, J.

Reissue patent No. 8,562, dated January 28, 1879, of patent No. 148,094, dated March 8, 1874, being more than four years thereafter, said reissue, under the recent decisions of United States supreme court, is null and void. As to patent No. 209,428, dated October 29, 1878, there is no infringement. As to patent No. 295,205, dated March 18,1884, said patent is null and void for want of patentability.

Bill dismissed, with costs.
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying  with 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, the  undersigned
Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Speaking  Roses   International,   Inc.,  a  Utah
corporation (the  "Company"),  hereby certify,  based on my knowledge,  that the
Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB/A of the Company  for the three  months  ended
March 31, 2007 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

By /s/ Alan K. Farrell
Alan K. Farrell
President and Chief Executive Officer

June 25, 2007



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5288

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid blue 324. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 7, 2004

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid blue 324.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON ACID BLUE 324. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.32.05 Acid blue 324 (CAS No. 

70571–81–2) (provided for 

in subheading 3204.12.45) .. Free No Change No Change On or before 

12/31/2007 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 5288 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
20. Persons at work 1 to 34 hours in all and in nonagricultural industries by reason for working less than 35 hours

and usual full- or part-time status

(Numbers in thousands)

Reason for working less than 35 hours

2010

All industries Nonagricultural industries

Total

Usually

 work

full time

Usually

 work

part time

Total

Usually

 work

full time

Usually

 work

part time

 Total, 16 years and over ................................................................... 35,097 10,217 24,880 34,505 10,033 24,471

Economic reasons ................................................................................ 8,874 2,245 6,629 8,744 2,183 6,561

 Slack work or business conditions ...................................................... 6,174 2,004 4,170 6,087 1,962 4,126

 Could only find part-time work ............................................................ 2,375 – 2,375 2,358 – 2,358

 Seasonal work .................................................................................... 207 123 84 184 107 77

 Job started or ended during week ...................................................... 118 118 – 115 115 –

Noneconomic reasons .......................................................................... 26,223 7,972 18,251 25,761 7,850 17,911

 Child-care problems ........................................................................... 800 61 739 793 61 732

 Other family or personal obligations ................................................... 4,634 623 4,010 4,562 613 3,949

 Health or medical limitations ............................................................... 737 – 737 722 – 722

 In school or training ............................................................................ 5,470 70 5,400 5,412 70 5,342

 Retired or Social Security limit on earnings ........................................ 2,184 – 2,184 2,074 – 2,074

 Vacation or personal day .................................................................... 3,395 3,395 – 3,351 3,351 –

 Holiday, legal or religious ................................................................... 854 854 – 849 849 –

 Weather-related curtailment ............................................................... 656 656 – 627 627 –

 All other reasons ................................................................................. 7,493 2,312 5,180 7,370 2,280 5,091

Average hours:

Economic reasons .............................................................................. 22.5 23.5 22.1 22.5 23.5 22.1

Other reasons ..................................................................................... 21.3 24.9 19.7 21.4 25.0 19.8

 NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data. Dash indicates no data or data that do not meet publication

criteria.

36

HOUSEHOLD DATA 

ANNUAL AVERAGES

 HOUSEHOLD DATA 

ANNUAL AVERAGES
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

January 25, 2013

p0122

Order 

January 25, 2013

146109

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146109

COA: 310346

Gd Traverse CC: 11-011321-FH

BRIAN JEFFERY SANDBERG,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 17, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case 3:10-cr-00640-PGS Document 24 Filed 12/22/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 26
Case 3:10-cr-00640-PGS Document 24 Filed 12/22/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 27
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KAREEM BARNES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 288 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of September, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
**EXHIBIT        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                                  |                                     |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                  | /s/ Andrew                T. Melton |
|   | Andrew T. Melton, Executive Vice President                  andChief                  Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting                  Officer) |

----
DAY PITNEY LLP

ONE JEFFERSON ROAD, PARSIPPANY, NJ 07054-2891

(973) 966-6300

dsager@ciaypitneycom

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Travelodge Hotels, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

TRAVELODGE HOTELS, INC., HON. WILLIAM H. WALLS, S.U.S.D.J.

Civil Action No. 1 1-cv-2599 (WHW)

Plaintiff,

v.

FINAL JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT

MERIDIAN GLOBAL INVESTMENTS, LP; *

MERIDIAN PREMIER MANAGEMENT,

LLC; and EVAN JACOBSON,

Defendants.

This matter having been opened to the Court by way of motion filed by plaintiff

Travelodge Hotels, Inc. (“THI”), by its attorneys, Day Pitney LLP (David S. Sager, Esq.,

appearing), seeking the entry of final judgment by default against defendants Meridian Global

Investments, LP (“Meridian Global”), Meridian Premier Management, LLC (“Meridian

Premier”), and Evan Jacobson (“Jacobson,” and collectively, “Defendants”) pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ, P. 55(b)(2); and it appearing that the Complaint in this matter was filed on May 5, 2011,

seeking damages from Defendants as a result of the breach and premature termination of a

license agreement between THI and Meridian Global; and service of a copy of the Summons and
g

g

Complaint having been effectuated on each of the Defendants; and the time for Defendants to

answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint having expired; and no extensions having been

requested or granted; and Defendants having failed to interpose an answer or otherwise respond

to the Complaint; and it appearing that default was duly entered by the Clerk ofthe Court against

Defendants for their failure to plead or otherwise defend in this action; and THI having provided

Defendants with notice of the motion for default judgment and related documentation; and the

Court having reviewed the papers; and good cause having been shown:

IT IS on this

day of , 2012,

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that THI have judgment against

Defendants, jointly and severally, in the total amount of $444,620.97 comprised of the following:

(a) $134,521.52 for Recurring Fees (principal plus prejudgment interest through

May 7, 2012);

(b) $302,008.44 for liquidated damages (principal plus prejudgment interest

through May 7, 2012); and

(c) $8,091.01 for attorneys’ fees and costs; and it is further

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that THI have judgment against

Meridian Global Investments, LP and Meridian Premier Management, LLC on the First Count

for an additional amount of $288,901.08 for infringement damages; and it is further

-2-
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that beyond the date of this Final

Judgment, post-judgment interest with respect to the total amount of this Final Judgment will

continue to accrue at the rate allowed by law until the Judgment is paid in full; and it is further

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that upon entry of this Final

Judgment the Second Count, Fourth Count, and Sixth Count are dismissed.

HON. WILLIAM H. WALLS, S.U.S.D.J.

-3-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                  5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            393,906
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      18,803
<ALLOWANCES>                                        3,590
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  409,119
<PP&E>                                             56,248
<DEPRECIATION>                                      8,971
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,241,574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             133,836
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                               80
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,023,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,241,574
<SALES>                                            85,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   85,123
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     479,802
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (292,029)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (292,029)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (292,029)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.05)




</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Orchid Biosciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Form
10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                             |  |  |  |                                                                                       
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:    March 31, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    PAUL J. KELLY, MD   
|                         |  |  |  |                             |  |  |  | Paul J. Kelly, MD Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                         |  |  |  |                             |  |  |  |                                                                                       
|Dated:    March 31, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    JENNIFFER L. COLLINS
|                         |  |  |  |                             |  |  |  | Jenniffer L. Collins Corporate Controller (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.