alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
72

 1 Data refer to persons who had 3 or more years of tenure

on a job they had lost or left between January 2003 and

December 2005 because of plant or company closings or

moves, insufficient work, or the abolishment of their positions

or shifts. 2 Data not shown where base is less than 75,000.

NOTE: Estimates for the above race groups (white, black

or African American, and Asian) do not sum to totals because

data are not presented for all races. In addition, persons

whose ethnicity is identified as Hispanic or Latino may be of

any race and, therefore, are classified by ethnicity as well as

by race.

SOURCE: January 2006 Displaced Worker supplement

to the Current Population Survey, U.S. Department of Labor,

Bureau of Labor Statistics

Table 31. Displaced workers1

 by age, sex, race, Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, and employment status in January 2006

(Numbers in thousands)

Total

Total, 20 years and over........................ 3,815 100.0 69.9 13.4 16.7

 20 to 24 years.................................... 111 100.0 66.4 21.4 12.2

 25 to 54 years.................................... 2,841 100.0 74.5 13.4 12.0

 55 to 64 years.................................... 728 100.0 60.6 12.3 27.0

 65 years and over.............................. 135 100.0 25.4 10.8 63.8

Women, 20 years and over.................... 1,739 100.0 65.6 13.1 21.3

 20 to 24 years.................................... 44 100.0 (2) (2) (2)

 25 to 54 years................................... 1,289 100.0 69.6 14.2 16.2

 55 to 64 years................................... 350 100.0 59.7 10.0 30.3

 65 years and over............................. 55 100.0 (2) (2) (2)

Men, 20 years and over....................... 2,076 100.0 73.5 13.6 12.9

 20 to 24 years................................... 67 100.0 77.4 21.4 1.2

 25 to 54 years................................... 1,552 100.0 78.6 12.8 8.5

 55 to 64 years................................... 377 100.0 61.5 14.5 24.0

 65 years and over............................. 80 100.0 27.5 18.3 54.2

White

Total, 20 years and over....................... 3,169 100.0 70.0 13.2 16.8

 Women.......................................... 1,386 100.0 64.8 13.3 22.0

 Men.............................................. 1,784 100.0 74.1 13.1 12.8

Black or African American

Total, 20 years and over...................... 452 100.0 71.2 13.4 15.4

 Women........................................... 271 100.0 70.7 11.5 17.9

 Men................................................. 181 100.0 72.1 16.3 11.6

Asian

Total, 20 years and over...................... 113 100.0 72.0 12.3 15.7

 Women........................................... 48 100.0 (2) (2) (2)

 Men............................................... 65 100.0 (2) (2) (2)

Hispanic or Latino ethnicity

Total, 20 years and over...................... 416 100.0 60.2 22.9 16.9

 Women............................................ 187 100.0 56.2 20.3 23.5

 Men............................................... 230 100.0 63.5 25.0 11.5

Age, sex, race, and Hispanic 

or Latino ethnicity Total 

Percent distribution by employment status

Total Employed Unemployed Not in labor force
United States Court of Appeals 

For the First Circuit 

No. 19-1896 

JACKELINE BARBOSA, 

individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, Appellant, 

MARK ANDERSON, individually and on behalf of other similarly 

situated; DOUGLASS BAKER, individually and on behalf of others 

similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC; SCHREIBER/COHEN, LLC, 

Defendants, Appellees, 

LUSTIG, GLASER & WILSON, P.C., 

Defendant. 

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on November 25, 2020, is 

amended as follows: 

On page 9, line 1, replace "like to us" with "like us"
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 99.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended January 31, 2003 (the "Report") by Forgent Networks, Inc.
("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Registrant.


                                             /s/ RICHARD N. SNYDER
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Richard N. Snyder
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             March 17, 2003


                                             /s/ JAY C. PETERSON
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Jay C. Peterson
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             March 17, 2003
Exhibit 23.0

                       CONSENT OF CLIFTON D. BODIFORD, CPA





               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


         I consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement Nos. 333-43174 and 333-43174 on Form S-8 of DutchFork Bancshares, Inc.
of our report dated November 2, 2001 relating to the consolidated balance sheet
of DutchFork Bancshares, Inc. as of September 30, 2001 and 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive operations, changes in
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended.





                                                    /s/ Clifton D. Bodiford, CPA
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Clifton D. Bodiford, CPA



Columbia, South Carolina
December 28, 2001
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification ofChairman and Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned officer ofWatson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)            the accompanying Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:       May 10, 2004

 
|   | By:    | **/s/ Allen Chao**                   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |   | **Allen Chao, Ph.D.**                |
|   |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)        |

 

The foregoing certification is beingfurnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and isnot being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
Arnold B. Calmann (abc@saiber.com) 

Jeffrey Soos (js@saiber.com) 

Katherine A. Escanlar (kae@saiber.com) 

SAIBER LLC 

One Gateway Center, 10th Floor 

Newark, New Jersey 07102-5311 

973-622-3333 

973-286-2465 (facsimile) 

Douglass C. Hochstetler (DHochstetler@KelleyDrye.com) 

Constantine Koutsoubas (CKoutsoubas@KelleyDrye.com) 

KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 

333 West Wacker Drive 

26th Floor 

Chicago, IL 60606 

312-867-7070 

312-867-7096 (facsimile) 

Beth D. Jacob (BJacob@KelleyDrye.com) 

Clifford Katz (CKatz@KelleyDrye.com) 

Sung W. Kim (SuKim@KelleyDrye.com) 

KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP

101 Park Avenue 

Suite 1700 

New York, NY 10178 

212-808-7800 

212-808-7897 (facsimile) 

Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs 

Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Mylan Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

OREXO AB, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

 

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and, 

MYLAN INC, 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

Honorable Michael A. Shipp, U.S.D.J. 

Honorable Lois H. Goodman, U.S.M.J. 

Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-03788 (MAS)(LHG) 

Case 3:11-cv-03788-MAS-LHG Document 74-5 Filed 07/30/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 726
2

ARNOLD B. CALMANN, hereby certifies as follows: 

1. I am an attorney-at-law of the State of New Jersey and admitted to 

practice before the Courts of the State of New Jersey and the United States District Court for the 

District of New Jersey. 

2. I hereby certify that I caused a copy of Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs 

Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Mylan Inc.’s (collectively “Mylan”) (1) Reply Brief in support 

of their Motion to Seal; (2) Declaration of Constantine Koutsoubas (with exhibits A – C); and (3) 

this Certificate of Service, to be served upon counsel of record by CM/ECF and electronic mail, 

this 30th day of July, 2012. 

Dated: July 30, 2012 s/ Arnold B. Calmann 

 Arnold B. Calmann 

Case 3:11-cv-03788-MAS-LHG Document 74-5 Filed 07/30/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 727
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CHAMBERS OF

MADELINE COX ARLEO

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MARTIN LUTHER KING COURTHOUSE

50 WALNUT ST.

ROOM 2060

NEWARK, NJ 07101

973-297-4903

 July 19, 2012

VIA REGULAR & CERT. MAIL, R.R.R.

Codrut Radu Radulescu, Esq.

65 Longview Street

West Orange, NJ 07052

LETTER ORDER

Re: Sync Labs LLC, et al. v. Fusion-Manufacturing, et al.

Civil Action No. 11-3671 (WHW) 

Dear Mr. Radulescu:

Currently before the Court is your request of July 5, 2012 to submit a Reply Brief in further

support of your pending Motion for Reconsideration. Your request is denied.

SO ORDERED.

 s/Madeline Cox Arleo 

MADELINE COX ARLEO

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Clerk

Hon. William H. Walls, U.S.D.J.

Christopher W. Hager, Esq.

File

Case 2:11-cv-03671-WHW-MCA Document 47 Filed 07/19/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 621
# Field descriptions

# National cross-industry

# National sector

# National_3digit

# National_4digit 

# Statewide cross-industry

# Country group cross-industry

# Country cross-industry
Case 1:11-cr-00552-NLH Document 6 Filed 08/17/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 55
Case 1:11-cr-00552-NLH Document 6 Filed 08/17/11 Page 2 of 6 PageID: 56
Case 1:11-cr-00552-NLH Document 6 Filed 08/17/11 Page 3 of 6 PageID: 57
Case 1:11-cr-00552-NLH Document 6 Filed 08/17/11 Page 4 of 6 PageID: 58
Case 1:11-cr-00552-NLH Document 6 Filed 08/17/11 Page 5 of 6 PageID: 59
Case 1:11-cr-00552-NLH Document 6 Filed 08/17/11 Page 6 of 6 PageID: 60
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Lamarlon Tremone Thompson, Appellant

No. 06-18-00066-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 4th District Court of Rusk 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR16-309). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, 

Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Lamarlon Tremone Thompson, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 5, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
# 2016

# 2017

# 2018

# 2019

# 2020
#### Lucia WONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11-35839.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2012.*

Filed Dec. 21, 2012.

Lucia Wong, Bellevue, WA, pro se.

Nancy Watkins Anderson, Lane Powell, PC, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellee.

*665Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Lucia Wong appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in her diversity action alleging unlawful termination based on race or ancestry in violation of Washington state law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Las Vegas Sands, LLC v. Nehme,*682 F.3d 526, 532 (9th Cir.2011), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Wong failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether she was performing satisfactorily for purposes of a prima facie case of discrimination and, in any event, whether Wells Fargo’s legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for terminating her was pretex-tual. *See Milligan v. Thompson,*110 Wash.App. 628, 42 P.3d 418, 423 (2002) (stating elements for a prima facie case of discrimination and explaining burden shifting framework); *see also Carmen v. S.F. Unified Sch. Dist.,*237 F.3d 1026, 1028 (9th Cir.2001) (unsupported subjective statement about defendant’s motive is insufficient to defeat summary judgment); *F.T.C. v. Publ’g Clearing House, Inc.,*104 F.3d 1168, 1171 (9th Cir.1997) (conclusory, self-serving affidavit lacking detailed facts and supporting evidence insufficient to create dispute of material fact).

Contrary to Wong’s contention on appeal, Wells Fargo’s belief that Wong violated federal regulations constitutes a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for terminating her, even if Wong did not actually violate federal regulations. *See Villiarimo v. Aloha Island Air, Inc.,*281 F.3d 1054, 1063 (9th Cir.2002) (“[Cjourts only require that an employer honestly believed its reason for its actions, even if its reason is foolish or trivial or even baseless.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


                                                                      [ASC LOGO]



June 8, 2000


Mr. Joseph Blake
Vice President and CFO
JPE, Inc. (dba ASC Exterior Technologies, Inc.)
30400 Telegraph Road, Suite 401
Bingham Farms, MI  48025

Subject:  Letter Agreement Regarding a Loan Guarantee

Dear Mr. Blake:

JPE, Inc., dba ASC Exterior Technologies, Inc. (ASCET), has requested that ASC
Incorporated (ASC) provide a facility which would guarantee Five Million
Dollars of ASCET debt with Comerica Bank.  ASC is willing to provide such a
guarantee under the following conditions:

a.        ASCET will pay, on a quarterly basis and in arrears, a fee of 3% per
annum for this service, and

b.        ASCET will provide a resolution from its Board of Directors
authorizing the payment of this fee; and

c.        ASCET agrees to indemnify and hold ASC harmless for any and all loss
arising from or relating to the issuance of this loan guarantee.

     If these conditions are acceptable to ASCET, please indicate such by
signing a copy of this letter and returning it to me at your earliest
convenience.


     Sincerely,


     ASC Incorporated

     /s/ Brad A. Obenauf
     Brad A. Obenauf
     Vice President & CFO

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     The terms and conditions set out in this letter agreement are acceptable to
JPE, Inc., dba ASC Exterior Technologies, Inc.:


     By: /s/ J. E. Blake

     Its:  Chief Financial Officer

     Date: June 27, 2000

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                ASC INCORPORATED
               One Sunroof Center, Southgate, Michigan 48195-3098
                  TEL. 734.285.4911  -  WEB. www.ascglobal.com
                     WHERE SPECIALTY VEHICLES COME TO LIFE
Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH -PS Document 39 Filed 02/24/12 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 523
Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH -PS Document 39 Filed 02/24/12 Page 2 of 18 PageID: 524
Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH -PS Document 39 Filed 02/24/12 Page 3 of 18 PageID: 525
Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH -PS Document 39 Filed 02/24/12 Page 4 of 18 PageID: 526
Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH -PS Document 39 Filed 02/24/12 Page 5 of 18 PageID: 527
Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH -PS Document 39 Filed 02/24/12 Page 6 of 18 PageID: 528
Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH -PS Document 39 Filed 02/24/12 Page 7 of 18 PageID: 529
Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH -PS Document 39 Filed 02/24/12 Page 8 of 18 PageID: 530
Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH -PS Document 39 Filed 02/24/12 Page 9 of 18 PageID: 531
Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH -PS Document 39 Filed 02/24/12 Page 10 of 18 PageID: 532
Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH -PS Document 39 Filed 02/24/12 Page 11 of 18 PageID: 533
Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH -PS Document 39 Filed 02/24/12 Page 12 of 18 PageID: 534
Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH -PS Document 39 Filed 02/24/12 Page 13 of 18 PageID: 535
Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH -PS Document 39 Filed 02/24/12 Page 14 of 18 PageID: 536
Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH -PS Document 39 Filed 02/24/12 Page 15 of 18 PageID: 537
Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH -PS Document 39 Filed 02/24/12 Page 16 of 18 PageID: 538
Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH -PS Document 39 Filed 02/24/12 Page 17 of 18 PageID: 539
Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH -PS Document 39 Filed 02/24/12 Page 18 of 18 PageID: 540
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel David Guerra DELGADO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-5035.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 14, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 27, 2012.

John Carlyle Sherrill, III, Sherrill & Cameron, PLLC, Salisbury, North Carolina, for Appellant. Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel David Guerra Delgado pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United States after having previously been deported following a conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2) (2006). The district court sentenced Delgado to forty-one months of imprisonment, and he now appeals. Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), questioning whether the sentence was reasonable. Although Delgado was informed of the right to file a supplemental pro se brief he has not done so. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Counsel questions whether the sentence at the low end of the advisory Guidelines range was reasonable. We review a sentence for reasonableness, applying an abuse of discretion standard. *Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); *see also United States v. Layton,*564 F.3d 330, 335 (4th Cir.2009). In so doing, we examine the sentence for “significant procedural error,” including “failing to calculate (or improperly calculating) the Guidelines range, treating the Guidelines as mandatory, failing to consider the [18 U.S.C.] § 3553(a) [ (2006) ] factors, selecting a sentence based on clearly erroneous facts, or failing to adequately explain the chosen sentence.” *Gall, 552*U.S. at 51, 128 S.Ct. 586. We will presume on appeal that a sentence within a properly calculated advisory Guidelines range is reasonable. *United States v. Allen,*491 F.3d 178, 193 (4th Cir.2007); *see Rita v. United States,*551 U.S. 338, 346-56, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007) (upholding presumption of reasonableness for within-Guidelines sentence). We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the sentence was reasonable.

We have examined the entire record in accordance with the requirements of *An-ders*and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. This court requires that counsel inform Delgado, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Delgado requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that *301such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Delgado. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
ANNUAL
MASTER SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE
   GE DEALER
FLOORPLAN MASTER NOTE TRUST
  The
undersigned, a duly authorized officer of General Electric Capital Corporation
(“ GECC ”), as
the master servicer (the “ Master
Servicer ”),
pursuant to the Servicing Agreement dated as of August 12, 2004 (as may be
further amended and supplemented from time to time, the “ Agreement ”),
between GECC and GE Dealer Floorplan Master Note Trust (“ Trust ”), does
hereby certify that:
  1.  GECC is,
as of the date hereof, Master Servicer under the Agreement.
 
 2.  The
undersigned is an authorized officer who is duly authorized pursuant to the
Agreement to execute and deliver this certificate to the Trust.
 
 3.  A review
of the activities of Master Servicer during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004, and of its performance under the Agreement was conducted under my
supervision.
 
 4.  Based on
such review, Master Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, performed in all
material respects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year
and no default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is
continuing.
 
 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 28th day of March, 2005.
  
 /s/
Michael
Cipolla
 Name:
Michael Cipolla
 Title:  
Principal Servicing Officer
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 By:
    /s/  Michael NoleName:
    Michael NoleTitle:
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    May 15, 2008
Order entered Ju ly 3 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 1 3
- 00 009
- CR
JOY JANE KIRVEN , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from t he Criminal District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause N o. F1 2
- 50611
- H



### O RDER
The Court GRANTS the June 27, 2013 request of the Dallas County District Clerk for an extension of time to file the supplemental clerk’s record in this appeal.
We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in the case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court appointed attorney fees. In accordance with Texas Code of Cri minal Procedure article 103.001, the cost bill shall be signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment for the cost. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include a document explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court appointed attorney fee.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the

Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Cle rk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE