Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 22, 2009 / Notices 36253 

Environmental Policy Act, National 

Historic Preservation Act and the 2006 

NPS Management Policies, and input 

received from the public during the 

planning process, Alternative D was 

chosen by NPS as the alternative to be 

implemented. Compared to all the 

alternatives considered, the selected 

alternative best fulfills the mandates of 

the Presidential Proclamations, the 

purpose and significance, and the other 

laws and policies guiding the NPS and 

the Monument. By partnering with 

others to help protect, interpret and 

educate visitors about the Monument, 

the island and New York Harbor, the 

Monument’s long-term future, viability 

and relevance is assured. 

The selected alternative best protects 

park resources while also providing 

high-quality visitor experiences 

including effective educational and 

interpretive programs focused on 

Governors Island National Monument’s 

purpose, significance and goals. 

Implementation of the selected 

alternative will not result in the 

impairment of park resources and 

values. Provisions in the selected 

alternative are incorporated to protect 

and enhance the park’s cultural and 

natural resources, and provide for highquality visitor experiences. Negative 

impacts are minor or moderate in 

intensity. Overall, the selected 

alternative will have beneficial effects 

on cultural and natural resources, the 

visitor experience and park operations. 

The Record of Decision includes a 

statement of the decision made, 

synopses of other alternatives 

considered, the basis for the decision, a 

description of the environmentally 

preferable alternative, a finding on 

impairment of park resources and 

values, a list of measures to minimize 

environmental harm, and an overview 

of public involvement in the decisionmaking process. This decision is the 

result of a public planning process that 

began in 2003. Between 2003 and 2007, 

prior to the release of the Draft GMP/ 

EIS, NPS staff met with and briefed 

representatives from numerous agencies 

and organizations about the GMP and 

NPS’s future plans on Governors Island. 

Additional public involvement 

activities followed the release of the 

Draft GMP/EIS and a detailed analysis 

of public comment with NPS responses 

was provided in the Final GMP/EIS. The 

official responsible for this decision is 

the NPS Regional Director, Northeast 

Region. 

Dated: June 11, 2009. 

Dennis R. Reidenbach, 

Regional Director, Northeast Region, National 

Park Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–17376 Filed 7–21–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–14–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

[Docket Number FWS–R9–MB–2009–N0097; 

91200–1231–9BPP] 

Migratory Birds; Take of Peregrine 

Falcons for Use in Falconry 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In December 2008 we 

completed an Environmental 

Assessment on take of peregrine falcons 

for use in falconry. This notice is to 

inform the public of the allocation of 

take of nestling and migrant peregrine 

falcons in 2009 agreed on by the States. 

It also will inform interested individuals 

about which States will allow take of 

nestling or migrant peregrine falcons. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. 

George Allen, Division of Migratory Bird 

Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service, at 703–358–1825. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Our 

authority to govern take of raptors is 

derived from the Migratory Bird Treaty 

Act (16 U.S.C. 703–712), which 

prohibits any person from taking, 

possessing, purchasing, bartering, 

selling, or offering to purchase, barter, 

or sell, among other things, raptors 

(birds of prey) listed in 50 CFR 10.13 

unless the activities are allowed under 

Federal regulations. Take and 

possession of raptors for use in falconry 

is governed by regulations at 50 CFR 

21.29. 

In 2007, we completed an 

Environmental Assessment (EA) on 

falconry and raptor propagation take (72 

FR 31268; June 6, 2007), in which we 

selected an alternative that will ensure 

that take of raptors for these purposes 

will be well below levels that will affect 

their populations. However, that EA did 

not consider of take of fall migrant 

peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus), 

which may originate outside the United 

States. 

We completed an EA on take of 

migrant peregrine falcons in 2008 (73 

FR 74508; December 8, 2008). Our 

preferred alternative was to allow take 

of 116 nestling and postfledging firstyear peregrine falcons from the nesting 

period through 31 August west of 100 

degrees W longitude (including Alaska), 

and allow a take of 36 first-year migrant 

peregrine falcons between 20 September 

and 20 October from anywhere in the 

United States east of 100 degrees W 

longitude. 

Allocation of the 36 fall migrant 

peregrine falcons to be taken from the 

United States east of 100 degrees W 

longitude was agreed upon by the 

Atlantic, Mississippi, and Central 

Flyways. We expect the allowed take of 

the fall migrants in 2009 to be as 

follows: 

State Allowed 

take 

Maryland ....................................... 4 

Virginia .......................................... 4 

North Carolina .............................. 3 

South Carolina .............................. 2 

Georgia ......................................... 5 

Arkansas ....................................... 3 

Mississippi .................................... 3 

Oklahoma ..................................... 2 

Texas ............................................ 10 

Total .......................................... 36 

In the western United States, the 

Central and Pacific Flyways allocation 

complies with the provisions of our 

2008 Final Environmental Assessment, 

to total no more than 41 nestlings in 

Alaska and 75 in the remaining western 

States. We expect take of nestling 

peregrines to be allowed in 2009 in 9 

States, as follows: 

State Allowed 

take 

Alaska ........................................... 6 

Washington ................................... 9 

Idaho ............................................. 0 

Montana ........................................ 5 

Oregon .......................................... 7 

Utah .............................................. 11 

Wyoming ....................................... 5 

California ....................................... 0 

Nevada ......................................... 0 

Colorado ....................................... 4 

Arizona .......................................... 8 

New Mexico .................................. 2 

Total .......................................... 57 

Western States continue to have the 

authority to determine allocation of take 

of nestlings. Take in previous years has 

been much less than we allowed, and 

has been consistent with other take of 

raptors for falconry. Therefore, after this 

year we will not publish information 

about allocation of nestling take. 

We expect the Flyways to review the 

allocation of the take of passage 

peregrines each year. We will continue 

to work with them on the issue, and 

may publish notices about it in the 

future. As noted in the Final EA on take 

of migrant peregrines, we will review 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
36254 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 22, 2009 / Notices 

population and harvest data for Canada, 

the U.S., and Mexico every five years, or 

at the request of the Flyway Councils, to 

reassess the allowable harvest limits. 

We will publish a Notice in the Federal 

Register if we determine that the take of 

nestling or fall migrant peregrines 

should be changed. 

Interested individuals will need to 

contact each State that will allow take 

of peregrine falcons to learn whether the 

State will allow take by a resident of 

another State. 

Dated: June 3, 2009. 

Stephen Guertin, 

Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–16923 Filed 7–21–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–55–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1034 (Review)] 

Certain Color Television Receivers 

From China 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Termination of five-year review. 

SUMMARY: The subject five-year review 

was initiated in May 2009 to determine 

whether revocation of the antidumping 

duty order on certain color television 

receivers from China would be likely to 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

material injury. On July 1, 2009, the 

Department of Commerce published 

notice that it was revoking the order 

effective June 3, 2009, ‘‘{b}ecause the 

domestic interested parties did not 

participate in this sunset review * * *’’ 

(74 FR 31409). Accordingly, pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 

(19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), the subject review is 

terminated. 

DATES: Effective Date: June 3, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired individuals are advised that 

information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). 

Authority: This review is being terminated 

under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act 

of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to 

section 207.69 of the Commission’s rules (19 

CFR 207.69). 

Issued: July 16, 2009. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–17311 Filed 7–21–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

Notice is hereby given that on July 16, 

2009, a proposed de minimis party 

consent decree (‘‘Consent Decree’’) in 

United States, et al. v. George A. 

Whiting Paper Co., et al., Civil Action 

No. 1:09–cv–00692 was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Wisconsin. 

In this action the United States and 

the State of Wisconsin sought to recover 

unreimbursed costs incurred for 

response activities undertaken in 

response to the release and threatened 

release of hazardous substances from 

facilities at and near the Lower Fox 

River and Green Bay Site in 

northeastern Wisconsin and damages for 

injury to, loss of, or destruction of 

natural resources in order to 

compensate for and restore natural 

resources injured by the release of 

hazardous substances into the 

environment at the Site. 

The eleven settling defendants are: 

George A. Whiting Paper Co.; Green Bay 

Metropolitan Sewerage District; Green 

Bay Packaging, Inc.; Heart of the Valley 

Metropolitan Sewerage District; 

International Paper Co.; Lafarge North 

America Inc.; Leicht Transfer & Storage 

Co.; Neenah Foundry Co.; The Procter & 

Gamble Paper Products Co., Union 

Pacific Railroad Co.; and Wisconsin 

Public Service Corp. The Consent 

Decree reflects the conclusion of the 

United States and the State of 

Wisconsin that each of the Settling 

Defendants qualifies for treatment as a 

CERCLA Section 122(g) de minimis 

party. The proposed Consent Decree 

requires the Settling Defendants to make 

a collective payment of $1,875,000. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the Consent Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and either e-mailed to 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States, et al. v. George A. Whiting Paper 

Co., et al., D.J. Ref. 90–11–2–1045/7. 

The Consent Decree may be examined 

at the Office of the United States 

Attorney, Eastern District of Wisconsin, 

530 Federal Building, 517 East 

Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 

53202, and at U.S. EPA Region Region 

5, 77 West Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 

60604. During the public comment 

period, the Consent Decree may also be 

examined on the following Department 

of Justice Web site, http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Consent Decree may also be obtained by 

mail from the Consent Decree Library, 

P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or 

by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy from the Consent 

Decree Library, please enclose a check 

in the amount of $10.75 (25 cents per 

page reproduction cost) payable to the 

U.S. Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, 

forward a check in that amount to the 

Consent Decree Library at the stated 

address. 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. E9–17489 Filed 7–21–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Office of the Secretary 

Submission for OMB Review: 

Comment Request 

July 16, 2009. 

The Department of Labor (DOL) 

hereby announces the submission of the 

following public information collection 

request (ICR) to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35). 

A copy of this ICR, with applicable 

supporting documentation, including 

among other things a description of the 

likely respondents, proposed frequency 

of response, and estimated total burden 

may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov 

Web site at http://www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/PRAMain or by contacting 

Darrin King on 202–693–4129 (this is 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES