alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Table 4. Employment status by marital status and sex, 2006 annual averages

(Numbers in thousands)

 Civilian labor force 

 Employed Unemployed 

 Total 

Percent

of

population

 Total 

 Percent 

of labor 

force

Total

Total, 16 years and over......... 228,815 151,428 66.2 144,427 63.1 7,001 4.6 77,387 

 Married, spouse present...... 120,327 83,156 69.1 80,972 67.3 2,183 2.6 37,172 

 Unmarried, total................. 108,487 68,272 62.9 63,455 58.5 4,817 7.1 40,216 

 Never married.................. 63,554 43,447 68.4 39,884 62.8 3,563 8.2 20,107 

 Other marital status............ 44,933 24,825 55.2 23,570 52.5 1,254 5.1 20,108 

 Divorced........................ 22,675 16,235 71.6 15,464 68.2 771 4.7 6,440 

 Separated..................... 8,413 5,849 69.5 5,480 65.1 369 6.3 2,564 

 Widowed...................... 13,845 2,741 19.8 2,626 19.0 115 4.2 11,105 

Women

Total, 16 years and over......... 118,210 70,173 59.4 66,925 56.6 3,247 4.6 48,037 

 Married, spouse present...... 59,576 36,314 61.0 35,272 59.2 1,042 2.9 23,262 

 Unmarried, total................... 58,634 33,858 57.7 31,653 54.0 2,205 6.5 24,775 

 Never married.................. 29,624 19,474 65.7 17,978 60.7 1,496 7.7 10,150 

 Other marital status............ 29,010 14,385 49.6 13,675 47.1 709 4.9 14,626 

 Divorced........................ 13,221 9,323 70.5 8,915 67.4 408 4.4 3,898 

 Separated..................... 4,635 2,965 64.0 2,750 59.3 215 7.2 1,670 

 Widowed...................... 11,154 2,097 18.8 2,010 18.0 87 4.1 9,058 

Men

Total, 16 years and over......... 110,605 81,255 73.5 77,502 70.1 3,753 4.6 29,350 

 Married, spouse present...... 60,751 46,842 77.1 45,700 75.2 1,142 2.4 13,910 

 Unmarried, total.................. 49,854 34,413 69.0 31,802 63.8 2,612 7.6 15,440 

 Never married.................. 33,931 23,974 70.7 21,907 64.6 2,067 8.6 9,957 

 Other marital status.......... 15,923 10,440 65.6 9,895 62.1 545 5.2 5,483 

 Divorced........................ 9,454 6,912 73.1 6,549 69.3 363 5.3 2,542 

 Separated...................... 3,778 2,884 76.3 2,730 72.3 154 5.3 894 

 Widowed...................... 2,691 644 23.9 616 22.9 28 4.3 2,047 

 SOURCE: Current Population Survey, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Marital status and sex

 Civilian 

noninstitutional

population

 Not in

labor

force Total 

Percent

of

population

2
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5136 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5136

   To amend section 108 of title 17, United States Code, relating to 
            reproduction of works by libraries and archives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 23, 2004

     Mr. Berman (for himself, Ms. Lofgren, and Mr. Smith of Texas) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend section 108 of title 17, United States Code, relating to 
            reproduction of works by libraries and archives.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preservation of Orphan Works Act''.

SEC. 2. REPRODUCTION OF COPYRIGHTED WORKS BY LIBRARIES AND ARCHIVES.

    Section 108(i) of title 17, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``(b) and (c)'' and inserting ``(b), (c), and (h)''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5202 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5202

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 5, 2004

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To clarify the treatment of supplemental appropriations in calculating 
 the rate for operations applicable for continuing appropriations for 
                           fiscal year 2005.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS IN 
              CALCULATING RATE FOR OPERATIONS.

    For purposes of the application of section 103 of Public Law 108-
309, supplemental appropriations shall be included in the calculation 
of the rate for operations only in accordance with the attachments to 
Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. 04-05 entitled 
``Apportionment of the Continuing Resolution(s) for Fiscal Year 2005''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 4, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION

OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Andrew G. Raguskus, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sonic Innovations, Inc. for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Sonic Innovations, Inc.



Dated:    March 15, 2004

|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|/S/    ANDREW G. RAGUSKUS                                          
|President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



I, Stephen L. Wilson, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sonic Innovations, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sonic Innovations, Inc.



Dated:    March 15, 2004

|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|/s/    STEPHEN L. WILSON                                                                     
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer)
Securities and Exchange Commission

Judiciary Plaza

450 Fifth Street NW

Washington DC 20549

 

RE:	Saturna Investment Trust, File #33-13247

 

May 2, 2001

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

On behalf of the referenced Trust and pursuant to Rule 497 (j),we wish to certify that the form of the recently filed Prospectusand Statement of Additional Information for CIK #0000811860,Saturna Investment Trust, would not have differed from the paperfiling (Rule 497 (b) and (c)) and that the text of the most recentregistration statement or amendment has been filed electronically.

If you have any questions or comments concerning this filing,kindly contact me at 1-360-594-9900 x303.

Yours truly,

/s/ Ethel Beltran

Ethel Beltran

Administration

Saturna Investment Trust
THE MCDANIEL LAW FIRM, PC 

54 Main Street 

Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 

(201) 845-3232 

(201) 845-3777 - facsimile 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Baseprotect UG, Ltd.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

BASEPROTECT UG, LTD., a German 

Corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

JOHN DOES 1-X (such persons being 

presently unknown), 

 Defendants. 

 

Civ. Action. No. 

RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE

The undersigned counsel for Plaintiff Baseprotect UG, Ltd. certifies that this party is a 

non-governmental corporate party and that this party does not have a parent corporation, nor is 

there any publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of this party's stock. 

DATED: June 23, 2011 THE MCDANIEL LAW FIRM, P.C. 

 By: 

Jay R. McDaniel, Esq. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Baseprotect UG, Ltd. 

Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC-JAD Document 2 Filed 06/23/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 49
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Penn Virginia GP Holdings, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, A. James Dearlove, Chief Executive Officer of PVG GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |              |  |                        
|----- |  | ------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: |  | May 11, 2009 |  |                        
|      |  |              |  | /s/ A. James Dearlove  
|      |  |              |  | A. James Dearlove      
|      |  |              |  | Chief Executive Officer

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 20-12497

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00537-VMC-AEP-3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JHON EDINSON GONZALEZ ROMERO,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(April 20, 2021)

Before NEWSOM, BRANCH, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

USCA11 Case: 20-12497 Date Filed: 04/20/2021 Page: 1 of 2
2

Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Jhon Gonzalez Romero in this 

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the 

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Romero’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 20-12497 Date Filed: 04/20/2021 Page: 2 of 2
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 28 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 88
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 28 Filed 07/21/11 Page 2 of 8 PageID: 89
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 28 Filed 07/21/11 Page 3 of 8 PageID: 90
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 28 Filed 07/21/11 Page 4 of 8 PageID: 91
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 28 Filed 07/21/11 Page 5 of 8 PageID: 92
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 28 Filed 07/21/11 Page 6 of 8 PageID: 93
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 28 Filed 07/21/11 Page 7 of 8 PageID: 94
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 28 Filed 07/21/11 Page 8 of 8 PageID: 95
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-10677

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

TOMMY D. ALCORN,

Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:06-CR-4-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Tommy D. Alcorn appeals the 24-month sentence he received after his

supervised release was revoked. The sentence was the statutory maximum that

Alcorn could receive and was within the Guidelines policy statement range of

imprisonment that he faced. Alcorn argues that the district court procedurally

erred when it sentenced him because the court’s stated reasons for his sentence

did not address Alcorn’s non-frivolous reasons for imposing a sentence below the

Guidelines policy statement range of imprisonment.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 30, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-10677 Document: 00511429771 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/30/2011
No. 10-10677

Because Alcorn objected only generally to the procedural reasonableness

of the sentence, his sentence is reviewed for plain error. See United States v.

Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 361 (5th Cir. 2009). To show plain error,

Alcorn must show a forfeited error that is clear or obvious and affects his

substantial rights. See Puckett v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 1423, 1429 (2009).

Even if such a showing is made, this court has the discretion to correct the error,

but only if it “seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of

judicial proceedings.” Id. (quotation marks and citation omitted). Because

Alcorn does not argue that an adequate explanation by the district court would

have changed his sentence, he has failed to show that the error, if any, affected

his substantial rights. See Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d at 365. Therefore, he

has not shown plain error. Id.

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 10-10677 Document: 00511429771 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/30/2011
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Franklin Towers
      Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Patricia E. Dowell, the Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly present, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                August 14, 2007By:/s/
                Patricia E. DowellName:Patricia
              E. DowellTitle:Secretary
EXHIBIT 4.9  THIS IS AN ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF THE ORIGINAL FRENCH DOCUMENT.  Non-Competition Agreement of Mr. Alain de Pouzilhac  Mr. de Pouzilhac confirms his irrevocable acceptance of this non-competition agreement, pursuant to the following conditions:  1.1
        Mr. de Pouzilhac shall not, for a period of 36 months from June 23, 2005:  
        solicit or work on Havas Group accounts, directly or indirectly, for payment or free of charge, either on his own behalf or on behalf of any employer or third party;  Accounts of the Havas Group shall include:  (a) all accounts which, in the course of the 12 months preceding June 23, 2005, were worked on by Havas SA or any of the companies within the Havas Group, or which were actively solicited by one or more of these companies;  (b) all accounts relating to advertising or the offer of services, which were sold under any of the trademarks or brand names used in the accounts defined in paragraph (a) above.  
        solicit or hire away any person who is in a management-level position of the Havas Group at June 23, 2005 or who was in a management-level position during the six months preceding June 23, 2005.  1.2
        However, for the avoidance of doubt, the present non-competition covenant shall not prevent Mr. de Pouzilhac from occupying the position of director or member of the supervisory board of a client company of the Havas Group. Mr. de Pouzilhac agrees, however, to maintain absolute neutrality in performing his duties at such client company and to abstain from all intervention in such companys choice of communications agency, with respect to the accounts addressed above.  1.3
        This non-competition agreement is valid for the territory of the Member States of the European Union as of the date of signature hereof and the territory of Switzerland.  1.4
        In consideration for the execution of the present non-competition agreement, Havas SA will pay Mr. de Pouzilhac during the above-referenced 36-month period, with the first payment to occur on July 31, 2005, a gross quarterly payment equal to half of the quarterly average of the gross fixed and variable compensation owed to Mr. de Pouzilhac by all of the Havas Group companies--excluding the compensation paid by Euro RSCG New York, Inc.--for the last calendar year.      1.5
        This agreement may not be terminated or modified except on the mutual written agreement of Havas SA and of Mr. de Pouzilhac.



Signed in Suresnes on June 28, 2005:

In two original copies












_______________________
        _____________________________For Havas S.A*
        Mr. Alain de Pouzilhac*Mr. Richard ColkerChairman and CEO






2
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 16

- 00296

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.M.C. , A.M.C., and N.R.S.C., Children

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014PA02352

Honorable Peter Sakai, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the order of the trial court is

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs be assessed against appellant in relation to this appeal

because he qualifies as indigent under T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.

SIGNED September 14, 2016.

_____________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5425 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5425

 To amend a provision relating to privacy officers in the Consolidated 
                       Appropriations Act, 2005.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 6, 2004

  Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend a provision relating to privacy officers in the Consolidated 
                       Appropriations Act, 2005.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    Section 1. Section 522 of the Transportation, Treasury, Independent 
Agencies, and General Government Appropriations Act, 2005 (division H 
of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005), is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``Sec. 522. Each agency shall have a Chief Privacy Officer, who 
shall assist the agency Chief Information Officer (designated under 
section 3506 of title 44, United States Code) in matters relating to 
the use, collection, and disclosure of personally identifiable 
information.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 RULE 15d-14(b)
                                       and
                               18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Thinka Weight-Loss Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith
Romine, Secretary, Treasurer, and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                         /s/  Keith Romine
                         ---------------------------------------
                         Keith Romine, Secretary, Treasurer, and
                         Principal Financial Officer
                         October 15, 2003


<PAGE>
###### **EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

AlphaPro Tech, Ltd

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

 

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002

 

In connection withthe quarterly report of Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd on Form 10-Q for the quarterending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lloyd Hoffman Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 10 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| DATE:  | **November 14, 2005** |   |    BY:                                                | **/s/****Lloyd Hoffman** |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |                       |   |                                                            |                     |
|   |                       |   |                                                            |                     |
|   |                       |   |    Lloyd Hoffman                                      |
|   |                       |   |                                                            |                     |
|   |                       |   |    Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice  President |

 

1

----