alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 540

To amend title 9, United States Code, to allow employees the right to 

accept or reject the use of arbitration to resolve an employment controversy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2003

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend title 9, United States Code, to allow employees 

the right to accept or reject the use of arbitration to 

resolve an employment controversy.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ARBITRATION CHOICE. 

4 (a) DEFINITION.—Section 1 of chapter 1 of title 9, 

5 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘nation, but 

6 nothing herein’’ and all that follows through the end and 

7 inserting ‘‘nation.’’. 

8 (b) ARBITRATION CHOICE.—Chapter 1 of title 9, 

9 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

10 following: 
2

•HR 540 IH 

1 ‘‘§ 17. Resolution of controversy 

2 ‘‘(a) Notwithstanding an employment contract that 

3 provides for the use of arbitration to resolve a controversy 

4 arising out of or relating to the employment relationship, 

5 arbitration may be used to settle such a dispute only if—

6 ‘‘(1) the employer or employee submits a writ7 ten request after the dispute arises to the other 

8 party to use arbitration; and 

9 ‘‘(2) the other party consents in writing not 

10 later than 60 days after the receipt of the request 

11 to use arbitration. 

12 ‘‘(b) An employer subject to this Act may not require 

13 an employee to arbitrate a dispute as a condition of em14 ployment.’’. 

15 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

16 The amendments made by section 1 shall apply to 

17 contracts entered into, amended, altered, modified, re18 newed, or extended after the date of the enactment of this 

19 Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 542 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 542

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 21, 2003

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To repeal the reservation of mineral rights made by the United States 
 when certain lands in Livingston Parish, Louisiana, were conveyed by 
                          Public Law 102-562.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF RESERVATION OF MINERAL RIGHTS, LIVINGSTON PARISH, 
              LOUISIANA.

    Section 102 of Public Law 102-562 (106 Stat. 4234) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a) In General.--'';
            (2) by striking ``and subject to the reservation in 
        subsection (b),''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (b).

SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF AMENDMENT.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall execute the legal instruments 
necessary to effectuate the amendment made by subsection (a)(3) of 
section 1.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 20, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of RADVISION Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Boaz Raviv, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Boaz Raviv              *


Boaz Raviv


Chief Executive Officer





April 25, 2010





*           The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Andrew D. Hyder, certify that:





Annual Report (the “Registrant”);





2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:














































Date: April 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Andrew D. HyderAndrew D. HyderPresident & Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10447 (Summary Calendar)

WILBUR L. WILLIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC., d/b/a ITT TECHNICAL INSTITUTE,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Northern District of Texas

(95-CV-1966)

February 10, 1998

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

In this Title VII employment discrimination case, PlaintiffAppellant Wilbur L. Willis appeals from the district court’s grant

of summary judgment, dismissing his action against DefendantAppellee ITT Educational Services, Inc., d/b/a ITT Technical

Institute. After reviewing de novo all of the facts as presented2 When Appellan t refused to include in the record on appeal a

transcript of the portion of the summary judgment hearing containing the ruling of the district court, we ordered a transcript prepared, the costs of which are assessed as costs of this appeal. by the parties, we reach the same conclusion as did the district

court

—— for the reasons advanced by that court —— and append

hereto a copy of the transcript of the district court’s oral

ruling. 2 Accordingly, the judgment of the district court, is, in

all respects, affirmed at appellant’s cost. The parties’

respective motions for attorney’s fees are denied.

AFFIRMED; costs assessed to Appellan t; parties’ motions for

attorney’s fees denied
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, the undersigned, Jay C. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer, of Forgent
Networks, Inc. (the Company), certify, that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
Company (the Report);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the periods covered by this Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in the Report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
the Report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
Company and we have (a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within these entities, particularly
during the period in which the Report is being prepared; (b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in the Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by the Report based on such evaluation;
and (c) disclosed in the Report any change in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys
most recent fiscal quarter (the quarter ended January 31, 2004) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls
over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and to the Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors: (a) all significant
deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls. /s/ JAY C. PETERSONJay C. Peterson
Chief Financial Officer
March 16, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of ThermoEnergy Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report"), I, Teodor Klowan, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 11, 2011





/s/ Teodor Klowan, Jr. CPAName: Teodor Klowan, Jr., CPATitle: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-40572

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DAMIEN VARGAS-PENA, also known as Domingo Alvarado-Cantu, also known

as Jorge Taran-Beltran,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:10-CR-50-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Damien Vargas-Pena

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Vargas-Pena has filed a response, which

includes a claim that counsel rendered ineffective assistance. The record is

insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Vargas-Pena’s

claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Such claims generally “cannot be

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 9, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-40572 Document: 00511404951 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/09/2011
No. 10-40572

resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district

1

court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the

allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006)

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the

record, counsel’s brief, and Vargas-Pena’s response discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

At his first plea colloquy hearing, Vargas-Pena made a passing remark about his 1

counsel’s effectiveness, but no record was developed on this point.

2

Case: 10-40572 Document: 00511404951 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/09/2011
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of SPEAR & JACKSON,
INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Dennis Crowley, principal executive officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                               /s/ Dennis Crowley
                                                   -------------------------
                                          Name:    Dennis Crowley
                                          Title:   Principal Executive Officer
                                          Dated:   January 10, 2003
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

----------------------------X 

J.G.,

 

 Plaintiff, 2:11-CV-2887WJM 

 

v.

 ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

C.M.,

 Defendant. 

----------------------------X

C.M.,

 Third Party Plaintiff,

v.

V.G. and N.G.,

 Third Party Defendants.

----------------------------X

The parties indicated this matter is settled; the terms of

the settlement having been placed on the record in open court,

It is on this 23 day of October, 2014 rd

ORDERED that this matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

s/William J. Martini

 _____________________________

 WILLIAM J. MARTINI, U.S.D.J.

Case 2:11-cv-02887-WJM-MF Document 179 Filed 10/24/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 2708
EXHIBIT 8

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG

Significant Subsidiaries and Associated Companies  As of September 30, 2001

|Name and Location of Company                                                             |  | Share in
capital |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | -
|EUPEC Europäische Gesellschaft für Leistungshalbleiter mbH & Co. KG, Warstein-Belecke    |  | 100              | %
|Infineon Technologies Dresden GmbH & Co. OHG, Dresden                                    |  | 100              | %
|Infineon Technologies SC 300 GmbH & Co. KG, Dresden                                      |  | 87               | %
|Infineon Technologies Austria AG, Villach, Austria                                       |  | 100              | %
|Infineon Technologies-Fabrico de Semiconductores, Portugal S.A., Vila do Conde, Portugal |  | 100              | %
|Infineon Technologies France S.A.S., Saint Denis, France                                 |  | 100              | %
|Infineon Technologies Holding B.V., Rotterdam, Netherlands                               |  | 100              | %
|Infineon Technologies Trutnov s.r.o., Trutnov, Czech Republic                            |  | 100              | %
|Infineon Technologies U.K. Ltd., Bracknell, U.K.                                         |  | 100              | %
|Infineon Technologies Holding North America Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, USA              |  | 100              | %
|Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Wilmington, Delaware, USA                     |  | 100              | %
|Infineon Technologies Richmond LP, Delaware, USA                                         |  | 100              | %
|Infineon Technologies Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., Singapore                                  |  | 100              | %
|Infineon Technologies (Integrated Circuit) Sdn. Bhd., Malacca, Malaysia                  |  | 100              | %
|Infineon Technologies Japan K.K., Tokyo, Japan                                           |  | 100              | %
|Infineon Technologies (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd., Malacca, Malaysia                            |  | 100              | %
|ALTIS Semiconductor S.N.C, Essonnes, France                                              |  | 50.1             | %
|ProMOS Technologies Inc., Hsinchu, Taiwan                                                |  | 32.5             | %

A complete list of all subsidiaries and associated companies is on file at the Commercial Register of Munich, Germany, under the number HRB 126 492.

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 RULE 15d-14(b)
                                      and
                              18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Thinka Weight-Loss Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Charles Seven, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                         /s/  Charles Seven
                         ---------------------------------------
                         Charles Seven, President & Chief Executive Officer
                         October 15, 2003


<PAGE>
Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 1 of 28 PageID: 1

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 2 of 28 PageID: 2

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 3 of 28 PageID: 3

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 4 of 28 PageID: 4

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 5 of 28 PageID: 5

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 6 of 28 PageID: 6

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 7 of 28 PageID: 7

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 8 of 28 PageID: 8

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 9 of 28 PageID: 9

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 10 of 28 PageID: 10

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 11 of 28 PageID: 11

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 12 of 28 PageID: 12

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 13 of 28 PageID: 13

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 14 of 28 PageID: 14

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 15 of 28 PageID: 15

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 16 of 28 PageID: 16

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 17 of 28 PageID: 17

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 18 of 28 PageID: 18

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 19 of 28 PageID: 19

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 20 of 28 PageID: 20

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 21 of 28 PageID: 21

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 22 of 28 PageID: 22

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 23 of 28 PageID: 23

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 24 of 28 PageID: 24

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 25 of 28 PageID: 25

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 26 of 28 PageID: 26

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 27 of 28 PageID: 27

Case 3:10-cv-01235-PGS-ES   Document 1   Filed 03/09/10   Page 28 of 28 PageID: 28
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5407 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5407

   To require the Secretary of Energy to prepare a strategic plan to 
  ensure that the United States is energy self-sufficient by the year 
                                 2015.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2004

  Mr. Larson of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
the Committee on Science, for a period to be subsequently determined by 
the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of Energy to prepare a strategic plan to 
  ensure that the United States is energy self-sufficient by the year 
                                 2015.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Energy Independence Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. DOMESTIC ENERGY SELF-SUFFICIENCY PLAN.

    Section 801 of the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 
7321) is amended by adding the following new subsection at the end 
thereof:
    ``(e)(1) Each plan submitted under this section after the date one 
year after the date of enactment of this subsection shall include a 
strategic plan to ensure that the United States is energy self-
sufficient by the year 2015.
    ``(2) The strategic plan under this subsection shall examine and 
report on the status of existing energy technology and domestic 
resources as well as developing energy generation and transmission 
technologies, including, but not limited to fuel cell technology, and 
should focus on their integration into an overall national energy 
portfolio to meet the stated goal of achieving energy self-sufficiency 
within 10 years.
    ``(3) The strategic plan shall include recommendations to Congress 
for targeted research and development in promising new energy 
generation and transmission technologies, and funding levels necessary 
for specific programs and research efforts necessary to implement a 
plan providing for the energy self-sufficiency of the United States 
within the next 10 years.''.
                                 <all>
```