alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

U

For the Northern District of California

NITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY INC.

Plaintiff(s),

v.

PFIZER, INC.

Defendant(s).

_____________________________________/

No. C 10-05597 MEJ

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT

TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION

FORM

 Pending before the Court are Defendant’s pro hac vice applications. Upon review of the

record in this action, the Court notes that Defendant has not filed a written consent to Magistrate

Judge James' jurisdiction. This civil case was randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge James for all

purposes including trial. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the magistrate judges of this district

court are designated to conduct any and all proceedings in a civil case, including trial and entry of

final judgment, upon the consent of the parties. An appeal from a judgment entered by Magistrate

Judge James may be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the

same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a district court.

You have the right to have your case assigned to a United States District Judge for trial and

disposition. Accordingly, Defendant shall inform the Court whether it consents to Magistrate Judge

James’ jurisdiction or requests reassignment to a United States District Judge for trial. A copy of

both the consent and declination forms may be obtained from the Northern District of California's

website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/. From the homepage, click on the "Forms" tab on the left

margin, then choose "Civil." The consent/declination form shall be filed by January 25, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2011 _______________________________

Maria-Elena James 

Chief United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:11-cv-03865-JLL-MAH Document 8 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 30
**EXHIBIT 24.01****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes andappoints Russell M. Medford, Mark P. Colonnese and Joseph M. Gaynor, Jr., and each of them, histrue and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution, for him and in hisname, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofAtheroGenics, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and any and all amendments thereto,and other documents in connection therewith, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto andother documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting untosaid attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and performeach and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done, as fully to all intents andpurposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that saidattorney-in-facts and agents or any of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, maylawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.     This power of attorney may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemedan original or a facsimile or photocopy of an original, and all of which together shall constituteone and the same power of attorney.     This 7th day of March, 2007.              /s/ MICHAEL A. HENOS   Michael A. Henos               /s/ R. WAYNE ALEXANDER   R. Wayne Alexander               /s/ SAMUEL L. BARKER   Samuel L. Barker               /s/ DAVID BEARMAN   David Bearman               /s/ VAUGHN D. BRYSON   Vaughn D. Bryson               /s/ T. FORCHT DAGI   T. Forcht Dagi               /s/ MARGARET E. GRAYSON   Margaret E. Grayson               /s/ ARTHUR M. PAPPAS   Arthur M. Pappas               /s/ WILLIAM A. SCOTT   William A. Scott
JUSTIN WAYNE WOOD

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 1097

______ _______________________/

Opinion filed July 3, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. James B. Fensom , Judge

.

Justin Wayne Wood , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFF IRMED.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           126,947
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 138,574
<CASH>                                             518
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          35,607
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 880,077
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 88,434
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          701,149
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,230
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   880,077
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              6,796
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 500
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   7,992
<BENEFITS>                                       3,751
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      3,661
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             5,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,562
<INCOME-TAX>                                       897
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,665
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,665
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Monday, August 17, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Monday, August 17, 2009, at 12:30 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for                           ( print page 36550)                        consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Sallie Chavez. For more information please contact Ms. Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: July 16, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-17459 Filed 7-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### United States *v.*Thompson.

*(District Court, E. D. South Carolina.*

January 14, *1887.)*

Post-Oejtce—Embezzling Registered Letters—Rev. St. U. S. § 5467.

The purpose of Rev. St. TJ. S. § 5467, is to prevent and punish any interference with, the contents of a letter in the custody of the mail; and a postmaster who takes money out of a registered letter, and borrows it, with the hope and expectation of returning it, and does return it, is within the terms of the statute.1

Indictment under Rev. St. U. S. § 5467, for secreting and embezzling a registered letter.

*L. F. Youmans,*Dist. Atty., for the Government.

*T. H. Clark*and *E. H.*Alley, for defendant.

1

 See Jones v. U. S., 27 Fed. Rep. 447.

Simonton, J.,

*(charging*jury.) One of the counts of the indictment charges the defendant with violating the provisions of section 5467 of the Revised Statutes, by secreting and embezzling a registered letter intrusted to him as postmaster, which letter contained $12 in United States currency, and that he did *steal or take*the contents thereof. The defendant has been examined before you, and admits that the letter ivas delivered to him to be registered, containing this sum of money, and that he gave a receipt for it; that he did not mail it for want of a post-office receipt for a registered package; that he put it in his pocket, and forgot it; that some days afterwards, when called upon by the person who handed him the letter, he produced it without its contents, but at once paid the value thereof to her. He denies that he stole, or intended to steal, this money. There is a conflict in the testimony upon the question whether the letter was sealed or not when handed to him for registration.

The counsel for the defendant has requested the court to charge the jury that they cannot convict the defendant unless they conclude from *707the testimony that he took the money with felonious intent; that the original taking must have been with intent to steal. Where words are used in a statute, a meaning must be given to each word, if possible. Words are not to be taken as synonymous, unless they are so necessarily. Congress, in using these two words,—“steal,” “take,”—with the disjunctive, must have intended them to hear different meanings, else both would not have been used. If you find from the evidence that the defendant took the contents of this letter *animo*furandi, with intent to steal them, he comes within the prohibition of this section; if you find that he took the contents, borrowing them, hoping and expecting to return them, making temporary use of them, he also comes within the prohibition of the statute, and may he found guilty. The purpose of the section is to prevent and punish any interference with the contents of a letter in the custody of the mail.
Case 3:11-cv-03587-AET-LHG   Document 31-2   Filed 01/23/12   Page 1 of 3 PageID: 509

Case 3:11-cv-03587-AET-LHG   Document 31-2   Filed 01/23/12   Page 2 of 3 PageID: 510

Case 3:11-cv-03587-AET-LHG   Document 31-2   Filed 01/23/12   Page 3 of 3 PageID: 511
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF PERIODIC REPORT**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended                April                30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended,                and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |                                                                                               |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | /s/ RICHARD              N. SNYDER                                                            |
|        |   |   | Richard                N. SnyderChief                Executive OfficerJune                14, 2006 |

----
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL Justice

MACKEY K. HANCOCK Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE Justice 

# Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449 www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

February 23, 2015

Joel Cook

LAW OFFICES OF WM EVERETT
SEYMORE

810 Main St. Lubbock, TX 79401

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Jeffrey S. Ford

Assistant Criminal District Attorney
P.O. Box 10536 Lubbock, TX 79408

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 07-14-00369-CR, 07-14-00370-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 2013-400,580, 2013-400,581

Style: Zavier Allen v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

The following has been filed in the captioned appeal:

Supplemental Reporter’s Record (1 volume)

Very truly yours, 

# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

xc: Honorable Bradley S. Underwood (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Janette Bills (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

34. Unemployed jobseekers by sex, reason for unemployment, and active jobsearch methods used

[Numbers in thousands]

Sex and reason

2023

Unemployed Percent of jobseekers using method

Average

number of

methods

used

Total Jobseekers

Contacted

employer

directly

Sent out

resumes

or filled

out

applications

Placed

or

answered

ads

Contacted

friends

or

relatives

Public

employment

agency

Private

employment

agency

Other

Total unemployed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,080 5,269 51.5 53.7 12.3 24.2 12.7 8.7 15.5 1.8

Job losers and persons who completed

temporary jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,870 2,059 54.3 54.3 13.6 29.6 15.9 11.7 16.1 2.0

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 822 53.1 57.1 13.8 21.2 11.1 7.4 14.8 1.8

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,831 1,831 48.2 50.3 10.7 20.1 11.1 6.7 16.3 1.6

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 556 556 49.6 57.6 10.8 22.2 8.9 6.0 12.1 1.7

Men. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,377 2,886 53.2 51.5 12.3 25.8 13.2 9.2 15.6 1.8

Job losers and persons who completed

temporary jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,744 1,252 56.6 51.9 13.3 30.8 15.4 11.9 16.0 2.0

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 425 425 54.2 56.4 15.1 20.2 10.9 7.6 14.3 1.8

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 892 48.9 46.4 10.1 22.3 12.1 7.0 17.1 1.7

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317 317 50.9 57.6 10.9 23.0 10.3 6.4 11.9 1.7

Women. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,702 2,383 49.4 56.4 12.3 22.3 12.1 8.1 15.4 1.8

Job losers and persons who completed

temporary jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,126 806 50.9 58.1 14.0 27.6 16.6 11.4 16.3 2.0

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 398 398 51.9 57.8 12.3 22.3 11.2 7.2 15.3 1.8

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 939 939 47.5 54.0 11.3 18.0 10.0 6.4 15.5 1.6

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239 239 48.0 57.6 10.7 21.2 7.1 5.5 12.4 1.6

1 Data on the number of jobseekers and the jobsearch methods used exclude persons on temporary layoff.

NOTE: The jobseekers total is less than the total unemployed because it does not include persons on temporary layoff. The percent using each method will always total

more than 100 because many jobseekers use more than one method. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

1
61

Table 21. Average weekly hours at work in all industries and in nonagricultural

industries by sex, 1976-2005 annual averages 

All industries Nonagricultural industries

Total Women Men Total Women Men

1976......... 38.7 34.1 41.7 38.4 34.1 41.4

1977......... 38.8 34.2 41.9 38.5 34.2 41.6

1978......... 39.0 34.5 42.1 38.7 34.4 41.8

1979......... 38.9 34.5 42.0 38.6 34.4 41.7

1980......... 38.5 34.5 41.5 38.3 34.4 41.2

1981......... 38.1 34.1 41.1 37.9 34.1 40.7

1982......... 38.0 34.1 40.9 37.7 34.0 40.6

1983......... 38.3 34.5 41.2 38.1 34.4 41.0

1984......... 38.8 34.9 41.8 38.6 34.9 41.5

1985......... 39.0 35.2 42.0 38.9 35.2 41.8

1986......... 39.1 35.4 42.1 38.9 35.3 41.9

1987......... 39.0 35.3 42.0 38.8 35.3 41.8

1988......... 39.4 35.7 42.4 39.3 35.7 42.2

1989......... 39.6 35.8 42.6 39.4 35.8 42.4

1990......... 39.4 35.8 42.3 39.3 35.8 42.1

1991......... 39.2 35.8 42.0 39.1 35.8 41.9

1992......... 38.9 35.6 41.7 38.8 35.6 41.6

1993......... 39.4 36.0 42.2 39.3 36.0 42.1

19941

........ 39.2 35.5 42.2 39.1 35.6 42.1

1995......... 39.3 35.6 42.3 39.2 35.7 42.2

1996......... 39.3 35.7 42.3 39.2 35.7 42.2

1997......... 39.5 36.0 42.4 39.4 36.0 42.3

1998......... 39.3 35.8 42.2 39.2 35.9 42.2

1999......... 39.6 36.2 42.4 39.5 36.2 42.4

20001

........ 39.7 36.4 42.5 39.6 36.4 42.4

2001......... 39.2 36.1 41.9 39.2 36.1 41.8

2002......... 39.2 36.0 41.8 39.1 36.1 41.7

2003......... 39.0 35.9 41.7 39.0 35.9 41.6

2004......... 39.0 35.9 41.7 39.0 35.9 41.6

2005........ 39.2 36.1 41.8 39.1 36.1 41.7

Year

1 The comparability of historical data has been affected at various times by methodological

and conceptual changes in the Current Population Survey (CPS). For an explanation, see the

Explanatory Notes and Estimates of Error section of Employment and Earnings, a monthly

BLS periodical.

SOURCE: Current Population Survey, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document





































 



 
 

  Exhibit 10.13    
    


 
 

  Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
  Non-Employee Director Cash Compensation at March 14, 2012    
    


        This Exhibit discloses the current understandings with respect to cash compensation between Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") and each of its non-employee directors. Axcelis provides both cash retainers and meeting fees to its non-employee directors, as follows: 


 
 

  Annual Retainers (paid quarterly in advance)    
    

 






					
	Board Member Position



 
	 	Amount 	 
	 Lead Director
	 	$	50,000	 
	 Non-Employee Board Member (not Lead Director)
	 	$	30,000	 
	 Audit Committee Chair*
	 	$	15,000	 
	 Compensation Committee Chair*
	 	$	10,000	 
	 Nominating Committee Chair*
	 	$	7,500	 









 


 	*
	Retainers
for Committee Chairs are in addition to the retainer payable to all non-employee Board members. 


 

         To
the extent that other committees are formed by the Board, similar retainers may be approved for the committee chairmen. 


 
 

  Meeting Fees (payable quarterly in arrears)    
    

 






					
	Meeting Type



 
	 	Amount Per Meeting 	 
	 In Person Board Meetings
	 	$	2,000	 
	 Telephone Board Meetings
	 	$	1,000	 
	 In Person or Telephone Committee Meetings**
	 	$	1,000	 









 


 	**
	Committee
meeting fees are paid only to committee members, and not to other Board me members, attending committee meetings. 


 


        Non-employee
directors also receive reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending Board and committee meetings.
Non-employee directors do not receive any Company-paid perquisites. 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.13


Axcelis Technologies, Inc. Non-Employee Director Cash Compensation at March 14, 2012

Annual Retainers (paid quarterly in advance)

Meeting Fees (payable quarterly in arrears)