alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GEBHARD v. ISBRANDTSEN CO., Inc.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

March 31, 1950.

*120Benjamin B. Sterling, New York. City, for plaintiff.

Lord, Day & Lord, New York City, William J. Brennan, New York, of counsel, for defendant.

McGOHEY, District Judge.

This is a suit under the Jones Act for damages for personal injuries and for maintenance and cure.

Plaintiff, pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. propounded twenty-four interrogatories to the defendant. Objections were made to nine, of which seven were disposed of on argument, leaving for consideration only two which relate to interrogatories Nos. 4 and 7. These demand “verbatim contents” or if in writing a true copy of “any statements or reports made to defendant by any of defendant’s agents, servants and employees with regard [interrogatory 4] to the said vessel striking a mine off the coast of Yugoslavia on or about March 25, 1947”; and “with regard [interrogatory 7] to any injury or illness sustained by plaintiff on or about March 25, 1947 and/or the treatment thereof.”

Although such documents cannot be secured under Rule 33, Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 504, 67 S.Ct. 385, 91 L.Ed. 451; Alltmont v. United States, 3 Cir., 177 F.2d 971, 976; Castro v. A. H. Bull & Co., S.D.N.Y., 9 F.R.D. 84, counsel for the defendant does not press this valid objection. Neither does it claim that its agents are beyond the reach of Rule 33, Hickman v. Taylor, supra. Defendant argues rather that, assuming this to be a motion for discovery properly brought under Rule 34, the plaintiff has failed to show good cause why he should get the demanded documents. I agree.

The affidavit in opposition to the objections is made by plaintiff’s counsel. It fails completely to show that the plaintiff has been prevented from getting the statements requested; indeed it would se.em that he has not even tried to do so for it is only now, more than a year after the filing of the complaint, that he is seeking the names of those who may have made the statements if any were made. This affidavit states that the plaintiff is “ill and on relief” and asks “how can he possibly afford to search out witnesses and. foreign doctors, and, assuming he could find them, go to the expense of sending attorneys all over the country to serve subpoenas on them and take their depositions.” No facts whatever are presented to support these assumptions and conclusions. The unopposed interrogatories will discover the names and addresses of the defendant’s witnesses who, for all that now appears, may all be available in New York for full examination by the plaintiff in appropriate proceedings. Reeves v. Pennsylvania R. Co., D.Del., 8 F.R.D. 616, 619; Newell v. Capital Transit Co., D.C., 7 F.R.D. 732. Plaintiff’s attorney shows no more than that it would be more convenient for him to proceed as *121he has. Mere convenience of counsel, however, is not in my view good cause within the meaning of Rule 34.

Accordingly, the objections to interrogatories Nos. 4 and *7*are sustained. Submit order.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 129819 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129819 COA: 261831 Saginaw CC: 01-020508-FC JIMMY FELTON MORGAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2005

Clerk
Case 3:10-cr-00860-PGS Document 86 Filed 02/23/11 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 91
Case 3:10-cr-00860-PGS Document 86 Filed 02/23/11 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 92
Case 3:10-cr-00860-PGS Document 86 Filed 02/23/11 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 93
Case 3:10-cr-00860-PGS Document 86 Filed 02/23/11 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 94
#### Joseph WOJCICKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AIKEN TECHNICAL COLLEGE; Susan A. Winsor, ex Graham ATC president; William Tilt, Associate Vice President of Technical Education; Thomas Desrocher, Program Coordinator; Lee Powell, Human Resources Director, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-2086.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 20, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 26, 2012.

Joseph Wojcicki, Appellant Pro Se. Charles J. Boykin, Kimberly Ann Gertner, BOYKIN & DAVIS, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Wojcicki appeals the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and to dismiss his employment discrimination complaint, and denying Wojcicki’s motions *287for relief from that judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Wojcicki v. Aiken Technical Coll.,*No. 1:06— cv-00461-MBS, 2012 WL 3596161 (D.S.C. filed Sept. 80, 2011 & entered Oct. 3, 2011; Aug. 21, 2012). We deny Wojcicki’s motion to add three new defendants to this action. Out of an abundance of caution, though, we grant Wojcicki’s motion to seal the documents filed in this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                    1,000
       
<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                              SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                            408
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  19,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     (799)
<INVENTORY>                                                    26,141
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               49,049
<PP&E>                                                         35,436
<DEPRECIATION>                                                (13,298)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                106,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         120,213
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                       28,051
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (43,430)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  106,477
<SALES>                                                       185,217
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              185,217
<CGS>                                                         165,885
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 188,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               35,946
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             10,659 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (50,304)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   (1,496)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (48,808)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (48,808)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  (10.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (10.61)

        


</TABLE>
Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities incompliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selectedtransactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred eitherprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated orreported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions orany other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance withthe servicing criteria.     As described in the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance for servicing criteria1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), the Company has engaged various vendors to performthe activities required by these servicing criteria. The Company has determined that none of thesevendors is considered a “servicer” as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company haselected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable toeach vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manualof Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations (“Interpretation 17.06”). As permitted byInterpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and procedures in placedesigned to provide reasonable assurance that the vendors’ activities comply in all materialrespects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The Company is solely responsiblefor determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendorsand related criteria as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect tothe Company’s eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.     Our examination disclosed the following material noncompliance with servicing criterion1122(d)(1)(i), as applicable to the Company during the year ended December 31, 2008. Policies andprocedures were not instituted to monitor certain events of default in that notification of theevent of default was not provided to the certificate holders within the timeframe required by thetransaction agreements.     In our opinion, except for the material noncompliance described above, the Company complied,in all material respects, with the aforementioned servicing criteria, including servicing criteria1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii) for which compliance is determined based onInterpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008.                                                    /s/ KPMG LLP  Chicago, Illinois
Consumer Price Index, Bureau of Labor Statistics, February 2013 

Consumer Price Index: Changes in Seasonal Adjustment Status for 2013

These items are changing to Seasonally Adjusted:

Item code Title 

CUUR0000SAM1

CWUR0000SAM1

CUUR0000SAN1D

CWUR0000SAN1D

CUUR0000SEHC

CWUR0000SEHC

CUUR0000SEHC01

CWUR0000SEHC01

CUUR0000SEHL

CWUR0000SEHL

CUUR0000SEMC04

CWUR0000SEMC04

CUUR0000SERC02

CWUR0000SERC02

Medical care commodities 

Domestically produced farm food 

Owners’ equivalent rent of residences 

Owners’ equivalent rent of primary residence 

Other household equipment and furnishings 

Services by other medical professionals 

Sports equipment 

CUUR0000SS04012

CUUR0000SS10011

CUUR0000SS53022

CUUR0000SS61011

Breakfast sausage and related products 

Butter 

Intercity train fare 

Toys, games, hobbies and playground equipment 
Consumer Price Index, Bureau of Labor Statistics, February 2013 

These items are changing to Not Seasonally Adjusted: 

Item code Title 

CUUR0000SEGD03

CWUR0000SEGD03

CUUR0000SEMC03

CWUR0000SEMC03

Laundry and dry cleaning services 

Eyeglasses and eye care 

CUUR0000SERE02

CWUR0000SERE02

Sewing machines, fabric and supplies
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 630

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide an apportionment to 

a primary airport that falls below 10,000 passenger boardings in a 

calendar year as a result of the discontinuance of air carrier service 

at the airport, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2003

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide an apportionment to a primary airport that falls below 10,000 

passenger boardings in a calendar year as a result of 

the discontinuance of air carrier service at the airport, 

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That section 47114(c)(1) of title 49, United States Code, 

4 is amended by adding at the end the following:

5 ‘‘(F) GRANDFATHER CLAUSE.—Notwith6 standing subparagraph (A), the Secretary may 

7 apportion to an airport sponsor in a fiscal year 
2

•HR 630 IH 

1 an amount equal to the amount apportioned to 

2 that sponsor in the previous fiscal year if the 

3 Secretary finds that—

4 ‘‘(i) passenger boardings at the air5 port are below 10,000 in the calendar year 

6 used to calculate the apportionment as a 

7 result of the discontinuance of air carrier 

8 service to and from the airport in any of 

9 the 3 calendar years preceding the cal10 endar year used for such calculation; and 

11 ‘‘(ii) the airport had at least 10,000 

12 passenger boardings in any of such 3 pre13 ceding calendar years.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Grace 2, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas Dyer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: July 14, 2011

By: /s/ DOUGLAS DYERName: Douglas DyerTitle: President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer,

Principal Financial Officer

and Principal Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                    1,000
       
<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                              MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                            357           
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  42,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                    38,188
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               89,963
<PP&E>                                                         95,605
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 22,950
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                196,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         151,493
<BONDS>                                                         9,096
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                       30,207
<OTHER-SE>                                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  196,683
<SALES>                                                        69,423
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               69,557
<CGS>                                                          63,231
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  70,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   19
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              3,464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (4,835)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   (1,567)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            (3,268)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (3,268)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   (0.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (0.71)
             


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Bradley P. Forst, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this AmendmentNo. 1 Report on Form 10-Q/A of Simula, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, thisamended report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this amended report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this amended report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this amended reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.  /s/ Bradley P. ForstBradley P. ForstChief Executive OfficerNovember 5, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 6 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-171]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and 
Texas)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 10, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227, or 
(414) 231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, February 10, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. Central Time. You can submit 
written comments to the panel by faxing the comments to (414) 231-2363, 
or by mail to Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin 
Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53201-2221, or you can contact us at http://www.improveirs.org. Please contact Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(414) 231-2360 for more information.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: December 22, 2008.
Roy L. Block,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-171 Filed 1-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ThermoEnergy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis C. Cossey, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Dennis C. CosseyDennis C. Cossey, Chairman,Chief Executive Officer,Principal Financial OfficerAugust 15, 2005