alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MCELROY, DEUTSCH, MULVANEY & CARPENTER, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1300 MOUNT KEMBLE AVENUE

P.O. BOX 2075

MORRISTOWN, NEW JERSEY 07962-2075

(973) 993-8100

FACSIMILE (973) 425-0161

NEW JERSEY NEW YORK PENNSYLVANIA CONNECTICUT MASSACHUSETTS COLORADO DELAWARE

667226-Wilmington Server 1A - MSW

JOSEPH P. LA SALA

Direct dial: (973) 425-8749

jlasala@mdmc-law.com

October 11, 2011

VIA ECF and HAND DELIVERY

Hon. Dennis M. Cavanaugh, United States District Judge

Martin Luther King, Jr. Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse

50 Walnut Street

Newark, New Jersey 07101

Re: In re: Medco/Express Scripts Merger Litigation

Civil Action No. 11-4211 (DMC) (MF) Dear Judge Cavanaugh: 

We, together with co-counsel Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, represent 

Defendants Express Scripts, Inc. and Plato Merger Sub, Inc. (collectively, “Express Scripts”) in this

consolidated matter. 

We write to provide Your Honor with courtesy copies of the following documents which were

e-filed with the Court earlier today in the above-referenced action:

Express Scripts’ Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion For Certification 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1292(b) and Stay Pending Appeal;

The October 11, 2011 Certification of Joseph P. La Sala, Esq. in further support of 

Express Scripts’ Motion For Certification Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1292(b) and Stay 

Pending Appeal, with Exhibit A; and 

The October 11, 2011 Certificate of Service of Joseph P. La Sala.

Our response to Plaintiffs' letter and proposed order dated October 7, 2011, is essentially

presented in the Opening Brief in support of Express Scripts' Motion for Certification and the attached

Reply Brief. Our position remains that oral argument on Express Scripts' Motion for Certification and 

Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 74-4 Filed 10/11/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 2818
MCELROY, DEUTSCH, MULVANEY & CARPENTER, LLP

Hon. Dennis M. Cavanaugh

October 11, 2011

Page 2

Plaintiffs' Application for Expedited Discovery should occur prior to the entry of any discovery order. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Joseph P. La Sala

Joseph P. La Sala

Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 74-4 Filed 10/11/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2819
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 5148

_____________________________ C HRISTOPHER L AMONT A LTMAN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Thomas V. Dannheisser , Judge

. August 21 , 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and O STERHAUS and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion un der Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
----

| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |   |                             |   |
|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      May 20, 2008 | By:    | /s/      Michael McLaren         |   |
|                    |   | Michael      McLaren             |   |
|                    |   | Principal      Executive Officer |   |
|                    |   |                             |   |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of ThermoEnergy Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report"), I, Cary G. Bullock, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 11, 2011





/s/  Cary G. BullockName: Cary G. BullockTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer
#### David A. DICE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent.

No. 2012-3139.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 4, 2013.

Charles Williamson Day Jr., Gebhardt & Associates, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner.

Elizabeth Anne Speck, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were Stuart F. De-lery, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Reginald T. Blades, Jr., Assistant Director.

NEWMAN, BRYSON, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0478

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSIAH BRACKETT,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 30, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 23 2022

12/23/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0478
H. R. 5039

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at United

States Route 1 in Ridgeway, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Eva Holtzman Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

United States Route 1 in Ridgeway, North Carolina, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Eva Holtzman Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Eva Holtzman

Post Office’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JASON STEPHEN BELL,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-50387

D.C. No. 8:08-cr-00087-MMM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Jason Stephen Bell appeals from the 108-month sentence imposed following

his guilty-plea conviction for receipt of child pornography, in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(A). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

FILED

SEP 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-50387

Bell’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a

motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We

dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d

1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 35 Filed 06/01/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 123
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 35 Filed 06/01/11 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 124
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 35 Filed 06/01/11 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 125
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 35 Filed 06/01/11 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 126
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 35 Filed 06/01/11 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 127
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. § 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted inconnection with this annual report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title18 of the United States Code. 

 

I, Faraj Aalaei, the ChiefExecutive Officer do certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1850, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and 

 

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Centillium Communications, Inc.
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

19. Persons at work in agriculture and nonagricultural industries by hours of work

[Numbers in thousands]

Hours of work

2016

Persons at work Percent distribution

All

industries

Agriculture

and related

industries

Nonagricultural

industries

All

industries

Agriculture

and related

industries

Nonagricultural

industries

Total, persons at work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146,152 2,369 143,783 100.0 100.0 100.0

1 to 34 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,632 575 34,058 23.7 24.3 23.7

1 to 4 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,421 37 1,385 1.0 1.6 1.0

5 to 14 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,257 133 5,124 3.6 5.6 3.6

15 to 29 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,362 261 17,101 11.9 11.0 11.9

30 to 34 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,593 144 10,448 7.2 6.1 7.3

35 hours and over. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111,519 1,794 109,726 76.3 75.7 76.3

35 to 39 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,564 104 9,460 6.5 4.4 6.6

40 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65,184 729 64,455 44.6 30.8 44.8

41 hours and over. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,771 961 35,810 25.2 40.6 24.9

41 to 48 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,747 186 12,561 8.7 7.9 8.7

49 to 59 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,300 274 14,026 9.8 11.6 9.8

60 hours and over. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,724 501 9,223 6.7 21.2 6.4

Average hours, total at work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38.7 43.0 38.7 – – –

Average hours, persons who usually work full time. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42.5 48.2 42.4 – – –

NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data. Dash indicates no data or data that do not meet publication criteria (values

not shown where base is less than 35,000).

1
* This order is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

** After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### March 18, 2009 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
ROLAND RUDD, also known as Farrakhan Israel Aziz, Petitioner-Appellant,
v. ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of Corrections, State of Kansas; STEPHEN N. SIX, Attorney General of the State of Kansas, Respondents-Appellees. No. 08-3268 (D.C. No. 5:07-CV-03097-JTM) (D. Kan.)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY *
Before McCONNELL , McKAY , and GORSUCH , Circuit Judges. ** Roland Rudd, a Kansas state prisoner, was convicted of sexual assault and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 272 months. Following the denial of his direct appeals and collateral proceedings in state court, he filed a challenge to his confinement in federal district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, in which he-2- raised some eighteen separate claims. In a thorough opinion, the district court discussed each claim and denied the petition. Because the district court did not rule on his subsequent request for a certificate of appealability (“COA”), it was deemed denied. See 10th Cir. R. 22.1(C). Mr. Rudd now seeks a COA from this court to permit an appeal of the district court’s denial of his § 2254 petition. In order to obtain a COA, a petitioner must make a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right,” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), such that “reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong.” Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 338 (2003) (quotation omitted). Mindful of the solicitous construction to be afforded Mr. Rudd’s pro se filings, Van Deelen v. Johnson , 497 F.3d 1151, 1153 n.1 (10th Cir. 2007), we nonetheless conclude that no reasonable jurist could doubt the correctness of the district court’s disposition. As such, and for substantially the same reasons given by the district court, we deny Mr. Rudd’s application for a COA and we dismiss this appeal. Entered for the Court

Neil M. Gorsuch Circuit Judge
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Orchid Cellmark Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Form 10-K) of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                                                                                  
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated:    March 15, 2007 |  |  |  | /S/    THOMAS A.
BOLOGNA                                                         
|                         |  |  |  | Thomas A. Bologna Chief Executive Officer                                        
|                         |  | 
|Dated:    March 15, 2007 |  |  |  | /S/    JOHN C.
DEIGHAN                                                           
|                         |  |  |  | John C. Deighan Corporate Controller (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CLOSED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 

:

LUIS ANGEL CORDERO, JR., :

:

Petitioner, :

:

v. :

:

DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, :

:

Respondents. :

 :

Civil No. 11-3753 (NLH)

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the Opinion filed herewith,

IT IS on this 30 day of December , 2011, th

ORDERED that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is

DISMISSED AS MOOT; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order and

the accompanying Opinion upon the parties, and shall close the

file.

 /s/ Noel L. Hillman 

NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J.

At Camden, New Jersey

Case 1:11-cv-03753-NLH Document 8 Filed 12/30/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 136
Exhibit 99.1
Millennium Electronics, Inc.
Form 10-QSB



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Millennium  Electronics,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Douglas P. Morris,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Dated: November 19th, 2002                    /s/ Douglas P. Morris
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:10-cr-00326-PGS Document 17 Filed 09/24/10 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 95
Case 3:10-cr-00326-PGS Document 17 Filed 09/24/10 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 96
Case 3:10-cr-00326-PGS Document 17 Filed 09/24/10 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 97
Case 2:11-cr-00184-JLL Document 43 Filed 03/29/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 90
Case 2:11-cr-00184-JLL Document 43 Filed 03/29/11 Page 2 of 8 PageID: 91
Case 2:11-cr-00184-JLL Document 43 Filed 03/29/11 Page 3 of 8 PageID: 92
Case 2:11-cr-00184-JLL Document 43 Filed 03/29/11 Page 4 of 8 PageID: 93
Case 2:11-cr-00184-JLL Document 43 Filed 03/29/11 Page 5 of 8 PageID: 94
Case 2:11-cr-00184-JLL Document 43 Filed 03/29/11 Page 6 of 8 PageID: 95
Case 2:11-cr-00184-JLL Document 43 Filed 03/29/11 Page 7 of 8 PageID: 96
Case 2:11-cr-00184-JLL Document 43 Filed 03/29/11 Page 8 of 8 PageID: 97
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 135 (Thursday, July 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17001]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold Closed Meetings on Monday, July 20, 
2009 at 3 p.m. and on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meetings. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(10), permit consideration 
of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meetings.
    Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meetings in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meetings scheduled for Monday, 
July 20, 2009 and Tuesday, July 21, 2009 will be: Post-argument 
discussions.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: July 13, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-17001 Filed 7-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

(Bar Docket No. 3881)

#### In the matter of the Complaint made against Robert Louis Marietta by the State Board of Law Examiners.

(478 P. 2d 212)

ORDER OF PUBLIC CENSURE

Whereas, In a proceeding conducted by the State Board of Law Examiners to inquire into the complaints of alleged professional misconduct by Robert Louis Marietta, and,

Whereas, Following a full hearing as to such complaints the State Board of Law Examiners found that said Robert Louis Marietta was guilty of three (3) violations of Canon No. 9 and one (1) violation of Canon No. 6 of the Canons of Professional Ethics (198 Kan. xvh), see DR 7-104 (A) (1) and DR 5-105 (B) of the Code of Professional Responsibility (205 Kan. lxxxv), and violation of the provisions of K. S. A. 78-101, and,

Whereas, The State Board of Law Examiners has made a written recommendation to this court that said Robert Louis Marietta be disciplined by “Public Censure” as provided by Rule No. 205 (m) (2), (205Kan. lxh), and,

Whereas, The said Robert Louis Marietta, pursuant to subdivision (n) of Rule No. 205, above, has in writing elected to accept such recommended discipline and to pay the costs of the proceeding, and,

Whereas, Upon consideration of the record and being fully advised in the premises, the court accepts the recommendation of the State Board of Law Examiners.

It is, therefore by the court Considered, Ordered and Adjudged that the said Robert Louis Marietta be, and he is hereby Censured by this court and that he pay the costs of the proceeding. It is further ordered that this Order of Public Censure be published in the official Kansas Reports.

By order of the court, dated this 12th day of December, 1970.