alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ex. B

Case 2:11-cv-04586-KM-MAH Document 94-2 Filed 05/31/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1221
 Lee S. Shalov is a partner and member of McLaughlin Stern LLP’s Litigation and 

Financial Services Department. He concentrates his practice in complex commercial litigation 

with an emphasis on prosecuting and defending securities class actions, consumer class actions, 

wage and hour class actions and mutual and hedge fund actions. Mr. Shalov has litigated cases 

throughout the country and represented companies and hedge funds located in the United States, 

England, Germany, and China. He also has substantial trial experience, having conducted multiweek jury and non-jury trials in Federal and State Court.

 Some of Mr. Shalov’s representative engagements include the following: 

3⁄4 Trial counsel in In re: Globalstar Securities Litig., which settled for $20 million 

after Plaintiffs rested their case. In commenting on the efforts of Plaintiffs’ trial 

team, the Honorable Kevin P. Castel observed that Mr. Shalov and his colleagues 

“have all done a terrific job in presenting the case for the plaintiffs.”

3⁄4 Represented investors In re Dreyfus Aggressive Growth Mutual Fund Litig.,

which resulted in an $18.5 million recovery on behalf of investors in the Dreyfus 

Aggressive Growth Fund. 

3⁄4 Lead trial counsel for Audiovox Corporation in Audiovox Corp. v. Benyamini,

which resulted in plaintiffs’ jury verdict in connection with the enforcement of 

corporate guaranty.

3⁄4 Co-lead counsel in Baan Company Sec. Litig., a securities fraud class action that 

resulted in a $32.5 million recovery for the class. 

3⁄4 Representing a China-based company and its senior executives in a securities 

fraud class action.

3⁄4 Co-lead counsel in Baird v. Thomson Consumer Electronics, a consumer class 

action that made available $100 million in cash and other benefits to purchasers of 

defective products. 

3⁄4 Lead trial counsel in a derivative action against Wayne Huizenga and other 

directors of Florida Panthers Holdings, Inc.

Case 2:11-cv-04586-KM-MAH Document 94-2 Filed 05/31/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1222
EXHIBIT 31.1
------------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, L. B. (Brad) Clarke, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Organetix, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
      being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
      the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: April 20, 2006
/s/ L. B. (Brad) Clarke
-------------------------------
Name: L. B. (Brad) Clarke
Title: Chief Executive Officer and President
SHOO-2012.12.31-EX 10.02




CONSULTING AGREEMENT


WHEREAS, Steven Madden,  Ltd., a Delaware corporation (“Madden”), desires to hire a consultant for its International division;  and


WHEREAS, JLM Consultants Inc., a Florida corporation  (“JLM”) desires to supply such services to Madden;  then
W I T N E S S E T H :


		
	1.
	JLM shall enter into this consulting agreement (the “Agreement”) with Madden.  JLM shall supply such services to Madden for its International division, in connection with sales and distribution of Madden product.  




		
	2.
	The term of the Agreement shall be approximately three years, and shall expire on December 31, 2014.




		
	3.
	JLM shall receive the following consulting fees:




		
	a.
	For the year 2012, 1.5% of net sales, excluding retail royalty income.


		
	b.
	For the years 2013 and 2014, 1% of net sales, excluding retail royalty income.


		
	c.
	For the entire term, 10% of all retail royalty income.


		
	d.
	To the extent that any commission income to the International division is not recognized in net sales, Consultant shall receive the applicable above percentages of that income.




		
	4.
	JLM shall receive a draw against fees in the amount of $25,000 per month.  Fees shall be payable quarterly.




		
	5.
	In addition:


		
	a.
	 On or about January 2, 2013, JLM shall receive a restricted stock grant of shares (SHOO) (the “Shares”) in the amount of $2 Million, such shares vesting in twelve equal tranches on the quarterly anniversary of the grant, starting April 1, 2013.  The amount of shares of the total grant shall be determined by dividing $2 Million by the price of the Shares as of the market close on January 2, 2013.


		
	b.
	Consultant shall receive an automobile allowance of $1,000 per month.







		
	c.
	Consultant, during the term, shall be entitled to participate in the Corporation’s health insurance, group insurance, hospitalization, and group health and benefit plans.  In the event that Consultant shall not be able to participate in Corporation’s health and other insurance packages as above, the Company shall reimburse Consultant for such expenses.






		
	6.
	JLM shall pay all taxes due on the receipt of any fees, and on the vesting of any Shares.




		
	7.
	JLM shall not be construed as an employee of Madden, but shall act as an Independent Subcontractor.  JLM shall not be entitled to any benefits accorded an employee, Section 5(c) above notwithstanding.  JLM shall not have the authority to bind Madden to any contract or other agreement.




		
	8.
	This Agreement shall be subject to the laws of the State of New York.  Should any one provision be found to be not valid, it shall not affect the validity of any other provision.




Signed, this 23 day of February, 2012.




/s/ JOHN L. MADDEN                /s/ EDWARD R. ROSNFELD
JLM Consultants, Inc.                    Steven Madden, Ltd.
By: John Madden                    By: Ed Rosenfeld, Chairman and CEO
Portfolio, the EQ/Large Cap Value PLUS Portfolio,

the EQ/Global Multi-Sector Equity Portfolio, the Civil Action No. 3:1 l-cv-041 94(PGS)EQ/Mid Cap Value PLUS Portfolio, the EQ/GAMCO (DEA)

Small Company Value, and the EQ/Intermediate

Government Bond Index Portfolio, and

Plaintif Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00312 (PGS)

vs. (DEA)

AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

and AXA EQUI’TABLE FUNDS MANAGEMENT

GROUP, LLC.

Defendants,

GLENN D. SANFORD. el al.,

Plaintiffs,

vsAXA EQUITABLE FUNDS MANAGEMENT

GROUP, LLC,

Defendant.

JOINT STIPULATION AND ftOPO1 ORDER REGARDING

PAGE LIMIT FOR REPLY BRIEFS

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants (the “Parties”) served respective summary

judgment motions on January 23, 2015 (the “Summary Judgment Motions”).

WhEREAS, the Parties served oppositions to the Summary Judgment Motions on March

20. 2015 (the “Summary Judgment Opsition Briefs”):

WHEREAS. the Parties must file respective reply briefs in further support of the

Summary Judgment Motions by May 4, 2015 (the “ggpjyjl’s”):

WHEREAS, the Defendants seek an extension of the page limitation set forth in the

Local Rules for this District for Defendants’ Reply Brief and Plaintiffs’ have consented to that

request:
District is increased from 11.25 pages using 12-point proportional l’ont to 20 pages using 12-

point proportional font (or 27 pages using 14-point proportional font):

NOW. THEREFORE. the Parties hereby STTPU[.ATE AND AGREE, by and through

their undersigned counsel and subject to thc Court’s approval, as t’ollows:

1. The Parties ma submit Reply Briefs to the Summary .Judgment Motions that do not

exceed 20 pages using 12-point proportional font (or 27 pages using 14-pointproportional font),

By: /s! Robert L. Lakind

Robert L. Lakind

SZAFFRMAN, LAKIND.

BLUMSTEIN & BLADER. P.C.

101 Grovers Mill Road, Suitc 200

Lawrenceville, N.J 08648

‘Fe]. (609) 275-0400

Fax: (609) 275-4511

.l1oi’nes for P/unti//.

So ORDERED.

AprilI. 2015

By: Is! .lonathan i\’l. Korn

.Jonathan M. Korn

BLANK ROME, l.l,l

301 Carncge Center. 3rd Floor

Princeton, N.J 08540

Tel: (609) 750-7700Fax: (609) 897-7395MEL.BANK, ‘I’WEED. JIADLEY & McCLOY

F F P

.Jarnes N. Benedict (pro hue vice)Sean M. Murphy t’/n’o huc lice)

1 Chase Manhattan PILILU

New York. NY 10005

(212) 530-5000

‘i lt0I’fle’j.S /0! J)e/eiiclciiirs

1-Ion. Peter G. SheridanL’nited States District Judge
#### WAMSUTTA MILLS v. CANNON MILLS CO. et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Dec. 16, 1942.

*235Breed, Abbott & Morgan, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Gerdes & Montgomery, of New York City, for Cannon Mills, Inc.

Hodges, Reavis, Pantaleoni & Downey, of New York City, for Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc.

HULBERT, District Judge.

Plaintiff sues to recover damages for infringement of a trademark registered in the United States Patent Office on or about November 24, 1931. , . ^

Upon the motion of the defendant Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc., to dismiss, the allegations of the complaint must be accepted as true.

While the Act does not create a trademark but merely provides for its registration, it is the use rather than the mere adoption of the trademark which gives the registrant protection intended in appropriating it to a particular class of goods, to distinguish his product from like goods sold by others with the hope that it will come to symbolize good will.

From the record before me it appears that up to June 30, 1942, the gross sales of sheets and pillow cases manufactured by the plaintiff under its trademark “Supercale” amounted to $8,701,564.72 and up to July 31, 1942, plaintiff spent the sum of $609,499 for advertising its product.

The defendant Cannon Mills Co. manufactures sheets and pillow cases under the trademark “Superfine Percale” which defendant Cannon Mills, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary and sales agent of the manufacturer, sells under said trademark to other parties throughout the United States, including the defendant Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc., which, in turn, sells said sheets and pillow cases under said trademark to the general public.

There is a doubt in my mind whether the acts of the defendant as alleged in the complaint may not create such confusion in the minds of the purchasing public as the Act itself was designed to prevent, and which is sufficient to justify the taking of proofs and the motion to dismiss is denied.

The same defendant also moves for a bill of particulars.

Its counsel is apprehensive that the language of the complaint may be susceptible to a construction, or that facts may later develop, which would entitle him, or even require him, to plead defenses of which he is not now aware.

This argument appears to be without merit. If, however, after issue joined, any such situation should develop, on application to the court to amend the answer, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 15 (a), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the present motion, in that event, might well prove to have been precautionary and protective.

The alternative motion is denied. Settle order if not agreed upon as to form.
I. MARQUIS WORKS, SBI No.: 601531C 84 is now confined at the Essex County Correctional Facility, 356 Doremus Avenue, NewarK, NJ 07105.

2. This individual is a defendant in a federal case and will be required at Newark, New Jersey before the Hon. Stanley R. Chester, on Tuesday, May 31, 2011 at 9:30 a.rn. for a Plea Hearing. A Writ of Habeas Corpus should be issued for that purpose.

DATED: May Ii, 2011 S:;RODNEY VILLAZOR

Rodney C. Villazor

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Petitioner - 973-645-2823

ORDER

/

4on. Stanley R. Chesler

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

The United States of America to Warden of the Essex County Correctional Facility: WE COMMAND YOU that you have the body of:

MARQUIS WORKS, SB! No.: 601531C , D.O.B

now confined at the Essex County Correctional Facility, on Tuesday, May 31, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. be brought before the United States District Court, the Hon. Stanley R. Chesler. U.S. District Judge, in the U.S. Post Office and Federal Courthouse, 2 Federal Square. Newark, New Jersey 07102 on Tuesday, May 31, 2011 at 9:30 a.m., so that he may appear for a plea hearing in the above-captioned matter.

WITNESS the Honorable Stanley R. Chesler

United States District Judge

Newark. New Jersey.

DATED: l WILLIAM T. WALSH

I Clerk of the U.S. District Coup

for the I)isWict of New Jersey

Per

Deputy Clerk
Case 3:10-cv-06037-PGS-DEA   Document 57   Filed 05/07/12   Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1530
! UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA H Hon. Katharine S. Hayden
v. : Crim. No. 11-471 (KSE)
ROD PEREZ H ORDER

This matter having been opened to the Court on the
United States Motion In Limine to Admit Evidence Pursuant to
Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) (doc. 24), by Paul J. Fishman,
United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (David L.
Foster and Rodney C. Villazor, Assistants United States Attorney,
appearing), Carl Herman, Esq., attorney for defendant Rod Perez;
the Court having considered the submissions of counsel at a
hearing on November 15, 2011 (doc. 27), the Court grants, in
part, and denies, in part, the United States Motion In Limine for
the reasons set forth on the record. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that:*
1. Vizcaino 404(b) Evidence, as specified herein, is
hereby admitted pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b):
a. On one occasion Perez asked Ms. Vizcaino to
transport a sum of money which was narcotics

proceeds to New York using a Red Acura.

1 At the hearing, the Government withdrew its motion to
admit the Honda Accord 404(b) Evidence, and the Court found that
Rule 404(b) did not apply to the conduct underlying the December
2010 404(b) Evidence.



2. Martinez 404(b) Evidence, as specified herein, is

hereby admitted pursuant to Fed. R. Evidence 404(b):

a. From October 2009 through November 2009, Martinez
supplied Perez with approximately 1-2 kilograms of
cocaine on 3-4 occasions on consignment. Perez
would then pay Martinez between $31,000 to $36,000
per kilogram several days afterwards;

b. From January 2009 through May 2009, Martinez
supplied Perez with approximately 1-2 kilograms or
6-7 occasions on consignment. Perez would then
pay Martinez between $31,000 to $36,000 per
kilogram several days afterwards;

c. In May 2009, Martinez supplied Perez with
approximately 1 kilogram of heroin with the
agreement that they would split the profits.
Martinez and Perez each profited approximately
$14,000, some of Perez’s share consisted of auto
parts from Martinez’ Ford Expedition.

d. From February 2010 through April 2010, Martinez
supplied Perez with kilograms of cocaine on 4
occasions on consignment. The first supply

consisted of 3-4 kilograms, the second and third

time consisted of 5 kilograms and the fourth



supply consisted of 10 kilograms. Perez would
then pay Martinez between $31,000 to $36,000 per
kilogram several days afterwards.

e. On one occasion, Martinez asked Rod Perez to have
someone bring money to New York. Perez tasked
Vizcaino to bring the money to New York. Vizcaino
utilized Martinez’ red Acura.

3. Tennessee 404(b) Evidence is hereby admitted pursuant
to Fed. R. Evidence 404(b).

4, Lynn 404(b) Evidence is hereby excluded.

avyu—

HON. KATHARENE S. HAYDEN
United States District Judge

+
Date: cecenner?_, 2011
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PRIMEDIA Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kelly P. Conlin, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|/s/KELLY P. CONLINKelly P. Conlin Chief Executive Officer and PresidentMay 10, 2004 |  |  |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 

This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5285

To suspend temporarily the duty on Direct blue 90. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 7, 2004

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Direct blue 90.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON DIRECT BLUE 90. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.32.08 Direct blue 90 (CAS No. 

71873–63–7) (provided for 

in subheading 3204.14.20) .. Free No Change No Change On or before 

12/31/2007 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 5285 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2009
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.
 By:
Name:
    
    /s/ Bryan McGuire

Bryan McGuireTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    August 14, 2009
EXHIBIT 10.3

                            ADDITIONAL AGREEMENT

This additional Agreement (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of
January 18, 2000, by and between Quintek Technologies, Inc.
("Quintek/Licensor"), a California corporation having its principal place of
business at 537 Constitution Ave., Suite B, Camarillo, California, 93012 USA,
and Qtek Aperture Card AB ("Qtek/Licensee"), a Swedish Company, having its
principal place of business at Kyrkogardsgatan 38, 69 133 Karlskoga, Sweden.

                                 Recitals

WHEREAS Quintek owns intellectual property rights and has licensed certain
intellectual property rights to Qtek and undertaken a purchase commitment
towards Qtek in exchange for shares in Qtek;

WHEREAS Quintek and Qtek wants to have other parts of their relation in a
separate agreement;

NOW THEREFORE for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement
herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:

                                 Agreement

Purchase by Quintek
-------------------

In addition to the purchase commitment regarding the 30 4303 units in the
License Agreement Quintek undertakes to, during the term of the 4300 License
Agreement, to purchase its need of 4305 units and spare parts exlusively from
Qtek but subject to the terms and exceptions in the License Agreement. These
purchases shall be made after the fulfillment of the first 30 purchases under
the License Agreement and under such terms and conditions which are reasonable
for both parties.

The price (not including, VAT, import-export cost etc.) for each purchase
shall be at least all reasonable manufacturing costs plus a margin of 10 %.

Purchase by Qtek
----------------

Qtek undertakes to, during the term of the 4300 License Agreement, to purchase
its need of aperture card media and 4303 units and spare parts exclusively
from Quintek. These purchases shall be made under such terms and conditions
which are reasonable for both parties.

The price (not including, VAT, import-export cost etc.) for each purchase
shall be cost plus a margin of 10%.

Reasonable Terms and Conditions
-------------------------------

If the parties do not agree on specific terms and conditions for the above
referred purchases shall the international rules and principles regarding
purchase of goods be applicable.
<PAGE>

Miscellaneous
-------------

This Agreement may not be assigned by either party without the prior written
consent of the other party.

This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the
4300 License Agreement and the laws of Sweden.

The duly authorized officers of each party have signed this Agreement.


Qtek Aperture Card AB

____________________________________
By: Christer Karstrom, Chairman


Quintek Technologies, Inc. A California Corporation

___________________________________
By: Thomas W. Sims, President & CEO