alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 136 (Friday, July 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34746-34747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16975]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1423-000]


Verde Energy USA, Inc.; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

July 10, 2009.

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Verde Energy USA, Inc.'s application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is July 30, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by

[[Page 34747]]

clicking on the appropriate link in the above list. They are also 
available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in 
Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the Web site that 
enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is 
added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance with any FERC Online 
service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c2a293e2f2302000502093f191c1c031e182c0a091e0f420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="692f2c3b2a26070500070c3a1c1919061b1d290f0c1b0a470e061f">[email protected]</span></a> or call (866) 208-
3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-16975 Filed 7-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The Missouri Pacific Railway Company v. Mrs. Ray Weil.

No. 612.

*Railroads*— Duty *as Bailee.*A railway company which, as bailee, accepts goods for storage in its depot after such goods have reached their destination is bound in law to deliver the same to the consignee or to his authorized agent,

Error from Reno district court; F. L. Martin, judge.

Opinion filed July 10, 1899.

Affirmed.

*J. H. Richards, C. E. Benton,*and *O. M. Williams,*for plaintiff in error.

*R. A. Campbell,*and *R. J. Cannell,*for defendant in error.

*840The opinion of the court was delivered by

Milton, J.:

The plaintiff in error seeks to reverse a judgment of the district court of Reno county in favor of the defendant in error in the sum of $129.68. The facts appearing in the record are, in brief, as follows : The defendant in error delivered to the plaintiff in error, at St. Louis, Mo., to be forwarded to Hutchinson, Kan., one box of clothing, of the alleged value of $144.45, receiving a bill of lading therefor. After the goods reached Hutchinson, the defendant in error requested the station agent to hold the goods for a few days, and the agent consented to do so, without charge for storage. About thirty days after the arrival of the box of goods, the husband of the defendant in error was introduced to the railway company's agent at the depot in Hutchinson, and stated that he had “come for that box,” meaning the box billed to the defendant in error. The goods were thereupon delivered to him, and he disposed of the same, all of which acts were without the knowledge or consent of the defendant in error, who was ignorant of the fact that he had obtained the goods until some days later, when she called for the box. She held the bill of lading, and the same had not been transferred. The defendant in error and her husband were not living together.

The district court instructed the jury that the only question of fact for their determination was the fair market value of the goods at the time they were delivered by the defendant company to a person other than the plaintiff; that the defendant, having as bailee accepted the goods from the plaintiff, was bound in law to deliver the same to her or her authorized agent, and that there was no evidence in the case to *841show that the goods were so delivered. An examination of the record shows that the evidence warranted the giving of this instruction. The court refused to give certain instructions asked for by the defendant below, which in effect .stated that the delivery of the box of goods to the husband of the defendant in error was only slight negligence and not such as to render the railway company liable, for the loss of the goods. The instructions were properly refused, as not being the law and as invading the province of the jury. *(Wheeler & Wilson Mfg. Co. v. Morgan,*29 Kan. 519; *L. L. & G. Rld. Co. v. Maris,*16 id. 333; *U. P. Rly. Co. v. Moyer,*40 id. 184, 19 Pac. 639.) The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C 1350)**

 

  I, **Nicholas Kaiser**, certify that:

This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form N-CSR for the period ended November 30, 2011 (the “Report”).

 I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

  Date: January 27, 2012  /s/ *Nicholas Kaiser*  President 

**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C 1350)**

  I, **Christopher Fankhauser**, certify that:

This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form N-CSR for the period ended November 30, 2011 (the “Report”).

I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

Date: January 27, 2012

/s/ *Christopher Fankhauser*Treasurer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**







**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of ThermoEnergy Corporation (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report"), I,
      Dennis C. Cossey, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
      to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 20, 2007




By: /s/
      Dennis C.
      Cossey


Name:
      Dennis C. Cossey


Title:
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CYBRA Corporation (the
“Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harold Brand,
Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Date:
August 18,
2009                                                         /s/Harold
Brand


Harold Brand


Chief Executive Officer
#### COLLINS v. C. W. WHITTIER & BROS. et al.

No. 1818.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

May 1, 1942.

A. Frank Reel and Roewer & Reel all of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

T. M. Reynolds and Tyler, Eames & Reynolds, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant Whittier.

Robert G. Dodge, of Boston, Mass., for defendant National Shawmut Bank.

FORD, District Judge.

The defendants’ motion for a bill of particulars (paragraph (e) being waived) is denied on the following grounds:

(1) The matters relied upon in the complaint by the plaintiff for recovery are averred with sufficient definiteness to enable the defendants properly to prepare a responsive pleading. Rule 12(e), Federal Rules of Civil Practice, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

(2) The information sought is peculiarly within the possession of the defendants and there is no ineluctable barrier to prevent them from filing a proper responsive pleading. Cf. Townsend et al. v. Boston & Maine Railroad, D.C.Mass., 35 F.Supp. 938. In Britt v. Cole Drug Co. of Boston, D.C.Mass., 39 F.Supp. 90, the court did not expect that the plaintiff would do otherwise than rely finally on the books of the defendant as it compelled the plaintiff only to particularize “so far as reasonably possible”.
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

To: Honorable William H. Walls
United States District Judge

cc: Shana Chen
Assistant United States Attorney

Antonio Toto
Defense Counsel

From: Barbara Hutchinson
United States Pretrial Services Officer

Re: CASTRO, Roy
Docket No.11-4571-1

Date: October 19, 2011

Attached is a Petition for Action on Conditions of Pretrial Release recommending that Your Honor
order the following:

X A warrant shall be issued to act as a detainer for the defendant.

O The conditions of release shall be amended as indicated in the attached Petition for Action.

0 A hearing shall be scheduled to address the violation of the conditions of pretrial release.

Should Your Honor concur with the recommendation, an Order has been provided for your signature.
Pretrial Services is available to the Court should any further information be needed.

Thank you for Your Honor’s attention to this matter.

Reviewed by:

- Jonathan Muller
Supervising United States Pretrial Services Officer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of New Jersey


U.S.A. vs. Roy Castro Docket No. 11-457-1
Petition for Action on Conditions of Pretrial Release

COMES NOW Barbara Hutchinson PRETRIAL SERVICES OFFICER, presenting an
official report upon the conduct of defendant Roy Castro, who was placed under pretrial release
supervision by the Honorable Mark Falk sitting in the Court in Newark, on November 4, 2010,
on a $100,000 Unsecured Appearance Bond with four co-signers under the following conditions:

1. Pretrial Services supervision;

2. The defendant's mother, Maria Cubero shall serve as third party custodian;

3. The defendant shall reside with his third party custodian;

4. The defendant shall be placed on 24 hours hour arrest with electronic monitoring with
absences to be approved fro Court, Attorney visits, medical treatment and other activities
approved by Pretrial Services;

5. The defendant shall abstain from the consumption of alcohol;

6. The defendant shall participate in alcohol and substance abuse testing and treatment as deemed
appropriate by Pretrial Services;

7. The defendant shall surrender passport and not re-apply for any new travel documents;
8. The defendant's travel is restricted to New Jersey unless otherwise approved.

Respectfully presenting petition for action of Court and for cause as follows:
[SEE ATTACHED ADDENDUM]
PRAYING THAT THE COURT WILL ORDER A warrant to act as a detainer
ORDER OF COURT I declare under penalty of perjury that the
A foregoing is true and correct.
Executed
on

Barbara Hutchinson
United States Pretrial Services Officer

United States Senior District Judge
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.3

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Russell M. Medford, certify that:

      (1) I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K
      of AtheroGenics, Inc.; and

      (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this report.

Date: April 5, 2005

                                    /s/ RUSSELL M. MEDFORD
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Name: Russell M. Medford
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       10
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In connection with the filing by ADE Corporation (the Company) of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2005
(the Report), the undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 9, 2005 |  | /s/ Brian C. James     
|                        |  | Brian C. James         
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:10-cr-00720-PGS Document 68 Filed 12/22/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 141
Case 3:10-cr-00720-PGS Document 68 Filed 12/22/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 142
EXHIBIT 10.7


INVESTORSVOICE.COM SERVICE AGREEMENT
  This lnvestorsVoice Service Agreement (the "Agreement") datedAugust 19. 2009 is made by and between SeaFarer (the "Company"),and InvestorsVoice.com,LLC ("InvestorsVoice")a Texas limited liability company.
  1.    Promotion Services.The Company hereby retains InvestorsVoice to perform the following services in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. InvestorsVoice willprovide FullMarketing services which include: daily news alerts. mid-day alerts. traders alerts. unlimited news releases all to 1.5 million opt-in investors plusthe Full Call Center Program (the "Services") for the Company mainly through database system for the term set forth below.
  2.    Term of the Agreement.The Services will begin August . 2009 (the "CommencementDate")and will end November 1. 2009 (the "End Date").Either party may cancel this agreement within or on 5 business days prior to the Commencement Date (the "TerminationDate")by e-mail ing the other party.
  3. Time Devoted by InvestorsVoice.It is anticipated that lnvestorsVoiec will spend approximately 45 days in fulfilling its obligations under this Agreement. The particular amount of time spent may vary from day to day or week to week or month to month..
 
 4. Place Where Services Will Be Rendered.InvestorsVoice will pertbrm most services in accordance with this Agreement on its website wv.\__________r,In addition InvestorsVoice will perl'onn services with other media outlets and at such other places as necessary to perform the Services in accordance with this Agreement.
  5.Payment to InvestorsVoice.InvestorsVoice has or will be paid $6.000 for work performed accordance with this Agreement. Both the Company and InvestorsVoice agree that InvestorsVoice will act as an independent contractor in the performance of its duties under this Agreement. No refunds are allowed after Termination Date. InvestorsVoice shall be responsible for payment of all taxes including Federal. State and local taxes arising out of the service activities in accordance with this contract, including by way ofillustration but not limitation. Federal and State income tax. Social Security tax. Unemployment Insurance taxes. and any other taxes or business license fee as required.
  6.   Confidential lnforrmation. Company agrees that the rate thatwas given is confidential and shall not be discussed with other firms. organizations or compnies. .
  Company Rep:
  By: /s/ Richard Davis
  Richard Davis, President
Case 3:11-cr-00482-JAP Document 9 Filed 02/23/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 35
Case 3:11-cr-00482-JAP Document 9 Filed 02/23/12 Page 2 of 6 PageID: 36
Case 3:11-cr-00482-JAP Document 9 Filed 02/23/12 Page 3 of 6 PageID: 37
Case 3:11-cr-00482-JAP Document 9 Filed 02/23/12 Page 4 of 6 PageID: 38
Case 3:11-cr-00482-JAP Document 9 Filed 02/23/12 Page 5 of 6 PageID: 39
Case 3:11-cr-00482-JAP Document 9 Filed 02/23/12 Page 6 of 6 PageID: 40
S05A0592.

#### HICKS v. THE STATE.

(612 SE2d 801)

Sears, Presiding Justice.

The appellant appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea to murder and armed robbery. Because the motion was not timely filed, the trial court did not err in dismissing it.1

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Hunstein, J., who is disqualified.*

*304Decided May 9, 2005.

Jemarco Hicks, *pro se.*

*Jeffrey H. Brickman, District Attorney, Robert M. Coker, Assistant District Attorney, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Raina J. Nadler, Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee.

1

*Rubiani v. State,*279 Ga. 299 (612 SE2d 798) (2005).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2559

DEBORAH S. COX,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, LLC,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,

District Judge. (3:14-cv-00679-MOC-DCK)

Submitted: June 20, 2016 Decided: July 26, 2016

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Geraldine Sumter, FERGUSON, CHAMBER & SUMTER, P.A., Charlotte, 

North Carolina, for Appellant. James M. Powell, WOMBLE CARLYLE 

SANDRIDGE & RICE, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina; Blair L. 

Byrum, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, LLP, Winston-Salem, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Deborah S. Cox appeals the district court’s order granting 

Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC’s summary judgment motion on her age 

discrimination claims, brought pursuant to the Age 

Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 

U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2015); and North 

Carolina’s Equal Employment Practices Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. 

§§ 143.422.1 to 143.422.3 (2015). We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s judgment. Cox v. Lowe’s Home Ctrs., LLC, No. 

3:14-cv-00679-MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 2015). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ThermoEnergy Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, P.L.
Montesi, President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



/s/ P.L. Montesi
----------------------------------
P.L. Montesi
President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
May 17, 2004
1

Samantha H. Evans (SE0898)

Bowles Crow Newman & Lutzer LLP

54 W. 21st Street, Suite 1007

New York, NY 10010

T: 646.374.0351

F:866.844.8305

sam@bowlescrow.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PATRICK COLLINS, INC.,

v.

JOHN DOES 1-26.

Civil Action No. 

CERTIFICATION OF RELATED CASES

I, Samantha H. Evans, certify that the following cases are related:

Caption Index Number

District 

Court Judge/Magistrate Judge

Patrick Collins , Inc. v. 

John Does 1-13 2:11-cv-01470-FSH -PS Newark

Faith S. Hochberg, J. 

Patty Shwartz, M.J.

Patrick Collins , Inc. v. 

John Does 1-10 2:11-cv-01512-FSH -PS Newark

Faith S. Hochberg, J. 

Patty Shwartz, M.J.

Patrick Collins , Inc. v. 

John Does 1-9 2:11-cv-01513-FSH -PS Newark

Faith S. Hochberg, J. 

Patty Shwartz, M.J.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:11-cv-03614-FSH-PS Document 1-7 Filed 06/20/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 25
2

 s/ Samantha H. Evans

Samantha H. Evans

Patrick Collins , Inc. v. 

John Does 1-21 2:11-cv-01514-FSH -PS Newark

Faith S. Hochberg, J. 

Patty Shwartz, M.J.

Patrick Collins , Inc. v. 

John Does 1-21 2:11-cv-01483-FSH -PS Newark

Faith S. Hochberg, J. 

Patty Shwartz, M.J.

Patrick Collins , Inc. v. 

John Does 1-10 2:11-cv-01484-FSH -PS Newark

Faith S. Hochberg, J. 

Patty Shwartz, M.J.

Patrick Collins , Inc. v. 

John Does 1-7 2:11-cv-01478-FSH -PS Newark Faith S. Hochberg, J. 

Patty Shwartz, M.J.

Patrick Collins , Inc. v. 

John Does 1-7 2:11-cv-01485-FSH -PS Newark

Faith S. Hochberg, J. 

Patty Shwartz, M.J.

Patrick Collins , Inc. v. 

John Does 1-5 2:11-cv-01486-FSH -PS Newark

Faith S. Hochberg, J. 

Patty Shwartz, M.J.

Patrick Collins , Inc. v. 

John Does 1-7 2:11-cv-01517-FSH -PS Newark

Faith S. Hochberg, J. 

Patty Shwartz, M.J.

Case 2:11-cv-03614-FSH-PS Document 1-7 Filed 06/20/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 26