alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6159

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ELI WRIGHT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-96-104, CA-98-2809-7)

Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 31, 1999

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eli Wright, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Eli Wright seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Wright, Nos. CR-96-104; CA-98-

2809-7 (Dec. 8, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
**REPORT of****INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

To the Shareowners and Board of Trustees  Idaho Tax-Exempt Fund  We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of the  Idaho Tax-Exempt Fund, a series of shares of the Saturna Investment Trust, including  the schedules of investments as of November 30, 2000, and the related statements  of operations for the year then ended, the changes in net assets for each of  the two years then ended, and the financial highlights for the four years then  ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility  of the Trust’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion  on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.  The financial statements and financial highlights presented for the year ended  November 30, 1996 were audited by other auditors whose report dated December  16, 1996, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements.  We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable  assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are  free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,  evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of November 30,  2000, by correspondence with the custodian. Our audit also includes assessing  the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,  as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe  that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.   In our opinion the financial statements and financial highlights referred to  above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Idaho  Tax-Exempt Fund as of November 30, 2000, the results of its operations for the  year then ended, the changes in net assets for each of the two years then ended,  and the financial highlights for each of the four years then ended, in conformity  with generally accepted accounting principles.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Tait, Weller & Baker  /s/ signature
December 15, 2000
EX-10.3


 Exhibit 10.3 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 Between DSP Group, Inc. (“Parent”), DSP Group, Ltd.
(the “Company”) and David Dahan (the “Executive”). Effective date of this amendment is March 5, 2013. 
 Executive entered
into an employment agreement with the Company, effective February 1, 2012 (the employment agreement and this amendment hereto hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Employment Agreement”). The Employment Agreement is hereby amended
as follows: 
 1. Section 3c of the Employment Agreement is amended and restated as follows: 

The Company will be entitled to terminate your employment without prior notification in the following cases: (a) your willful and
continued failure to substantially perform your duties with the Company or Parent (other than such failure resulting from your incapacity due to physical or mental illness) after there is delivered to you by the Board of Directors of Parent (the
“Board”) a written demand for substantial performance which sets forth in detail the specific respects in which it believes you have not substantially performed your duties; (b) your willfully engaging in gross misconduct which is
materially and demonstrably injurious to the Company or Parent; or (c) your committing a felony or an act of fraud against the Company or Parent. 
 No act, or failure to act, by you shall be considered “willful” if done, or omitted to be done, by you in good faith and in your reasonable belief that your act or omission was in the best
interest of the Company or Parent and/or required by applicable law. 
 2. For purposes of the Employment Agreement, Executive shall not be
deemed to have been terminated pursuant to Section 3c unless and until there shall have been delivered to Executive a copy of a resolution duly adopted by the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the entire membership of the Board at a
meeting of the Board called and held for that purpose (after reasonable notice to and an opportunity for Executive, together with Executive’s counsel, to be heard before the Board), finding that in the good faith opinion of the Board, Executive
was guilty of conduct set forth in Section 3c and specifying the particulars thereof in detail. 
 3. This amendment to the Employment Agreement
shall be binding upon Parent, the Company and their successors and assigns, if any. 
 4. All terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement,
other than amended hereby, shall remain in full force and effect. 
  

							
	 /s/ Ofer Elyakim
	 		 		 	 /s/ David Dahan

	DSP Group, Inc.	 		 		 	David Dahan
				
	 /s/ Dror Levy
	 		 		 	
	DSP Group, Ltd.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 

:

DEAN W. SCHOMBURG, :

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

DOW JONES & CO., :

:

Defendant. :

 :

 Civil No. 11-3410 (GEB)

OPINION AND ORDER

BROWN, Chief Judge

Plaintiff Dean W. Schomburg (“Schomburg”) filed a complaint on June 13, 2011, that

opened the above captioned case in this Court. (Doc. No. 1.) It appears that:

1. The Clerk of the Court will not file the complaint unless the person seeking relief pays

the entire applicable filing fee in advance or the person applies for and is granted in forma pauperis

status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. See Local Civil R. 5.1(f).

2. The filing fee for commencing a civil action in this court is $350.00. See 28 U.S.C. §

1914(a). 

3. Schomburg did not prepay $350.00; rather, he submitted an application to proceed in this

matter in forma pauperis (IFP Application), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (IFP Application; Doc.

No. 1.)

4. Having considered Schomburg’s IFP Application, the Court concludes that Schomburg

has not adequately established that his financial condition renders him reasonably impoverished, or

Case 3:11-cv-03410-GEB-TJB Document 4 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 15
that payment of the $350.00 filing fee is an undue hardship; instead, Schomburg’s IFP Application

lists not-insignificant net assets and regular monthly income that apparently exceeds expenses. 

Therefore, for the foregoing reasons;

IT IS THIS 15 day of December, 2011, hereby th

ORDERED that Schomburg’s IFP Application is DENIED; (Doc. No. 1.) 

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court transmit a copyof this orderto Schomburg via regular

U.S. Mail;

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court administratively terminate this matter without

prejudice to reopen if Schomburg pays the statutorily-mandated $350 filing fee;

ORDERED that, if this case is reopened in the future, the Clerk of the Court REASSIGN it

to another District Judge in the Trenton Vicinage. 

 /s/ Garrett E. Brown, Jr. 

GARRETT E. BROWN, JR., U.S.D.J.

Page 2 of 2

Case 3:11-cv-03410-GEB-TJB Document 4 Filed 12/15/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 16
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 639

To amend the Act of March 3, 1875, to permit the State of Colorado 

to use land held in trust by the State as open space, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2003

Mr. UDALL of Colorado introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To amend the Act of March 3, 1875, to permit the State 

of Colorado to use land held in trust by the State as 

open space, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COLORADO TRUST LAND. 

4 Section 7 of the Act of March 3, 1875 (18 Stat. 475; 

5 chapter 139; commonly known as the ‘‘Colorado Enabling 

6 Act’’), is amended by inserting before the period at the 

7 end the following: ‘‘and for use for open space, wildlife 

8 habitat, scenic value, or other natural values, but any in9 come received for such uses or any other uses of such 
2

•HR 639 IH 

1 lands shall be used only for the common schools as de2 scribed under section 14’’.

Æ
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5283

To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse blue 281. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 7, 2004

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse blue 281.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON DISPERSE BLUE 281. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.32.10 Disperse blue 281 (CAS 

Nos. 53950–33–7, 22578–

86–5, 56548–64–2, and 

67674–22–0) (provided for 

in subheading 3204.11.50) .. Free No Change No Change On or before 

12/31/2007 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 5283 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
EX-99.3
          CONFIRMATION OF PROVISIONAL PATENT APPLICATION

               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE


Bryan Haddox
10260 Washington St. #1818
Thornton, CO 80229

Receipt is acknowledged of this provisional Patent Application. It
will not be examined for patentability and will become abandoned not
later than twelve months after its filing date.  Be sure to provide
the US. APPLICATION NUMBER, FILING DATE, NAME OF APPLICANT, and TITLE
OF INVENTION when inquiring about this application.  Fees transmitted
by check or draft are subject to collection.  Please verify the
accuracy of the data presented on this receipt.  If an error is noted
on this Filing Receipt, please write to the Office of Initial Patent
Examination's Filing Receipt Corrections, facsimile number 703-
746~9195.  Please provide a copy of this Filing Receipt with the
changes noted thereon.  If you received a "Notice to File Missing
Parts" for this application, please submit any corrections to this
Filing Receipt with your reply to the Notice.  When the USPTO
processes the reply to the Notice, the USPTO will generate another
Filing Receipt incorporating the requested corrections (if appropriate).

Applicant(s)

Bryan W. Haddox, Thornton, CO.
Roy F. Bishop, Lafayette, CO.

Power of Attorney: None

If Required, Foreign Filing License Granted: 09/02/2004

The number of your priority application, to be used for filing abroad
under the Paris Convention is: US60/530,705

Projected Publication Date: None.  Application is not eligible for
pre-grant publication.

Non-Publication Request: No

Early Publication Request: No
[No. 54667-8-I.

Division One.

October 31, 2005.]

#### Joseph Luna et al., *Respondents,*v. Household Finance Corporation, III, et al., *Appellants.*

The Court of Appeals *withdrew*the unpublished opinion in this cause and *dismissed*the appeal by order dated February 6, 2006.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Grace 6, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for quarter ending November 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Virginia K. Sourlis,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: December
      10, 2008
                /s/ Virginia K. SourlisVirginia K. SourlisChief
      Executive Officer andChief
      Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer)(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Raj Sabhlok, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By:/s/ |  | RAJ SABHLOKRaj Sabhlok Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Corporate Development
|------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 26, 2003
Percent per year

1.4 1.5

2.5

2.8

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

1979-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2006

Chart 1-17. Labor productivity began to accelerate in the 

mid-1990s, led by gains in manufacturing

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Growth in output per hour of all persons, nonfarm 

business sector, 1979-2006

Growth in output per hour of all persons, 

manufacturing sector, 1987-2006

Percent per year

1.7

3.4

4.7

4.2

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

1987-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2006

• Labor productivity relates changes in the real production of goods and services 

to changes in the hours of all persons working in a sector.

• Since 1990, labor productivity growth has averaged 2.3 percent per year in the 

total nonfarm business sector and 4.1 percent per year in manufacturing.

• In contrast to earlier long economic expansions, the expansion of the 1990s was 

marked by higher productivity growth in the latter part of the cycle. Nonfarm 

business productivity grew by 1.5 percent per year from 1990 to 1995 and by 

2.5 percent in the 1995 to 2000 period.

• Higher rates of productivity growth have continued into the current period. 

Since 2000, labor productivity has been rising at a 2.8-percent annual rate in 

nonfarm businesses and at a 4.2-percent annual rate in manufacturing.

Chart 1-17. Labor productivity began to accelerate in the 

mid-1990s, led by gains in manufacturing
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 685 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 685

  To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to repeal the provisions 
 prohibiting persons convicted of drug offenses from receiving student 
                         financial assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2003

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. Towns, Mr. Olver, Mr. 
  McDermott, Mr. George Miller of California, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. 
Waxman, Mr. Blumenauer, Ms. Norton, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. Farr, 
Ms. Slaughter, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Markey, Mr. Nadler, 
   Mr. Tierney, Mr. Rush, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Capuano, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. 
Abercrombie, Mr. Snyder, Mr. Matsui, Mr. Payne, Mr. Hoeffel, Mr. Owens, 
    Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. Baca, Mr. Stark, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. 
   Lofgren, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Filner, Mr. Cummings, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. 
 Matheson, Mr. Wexler, and Mr. Lantos) introduced the following bill; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to repeal the provisions 
 prohibiting persons convicted of drug offenses from receiving student 
                         financial assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROVISIONS PROHIBITING PERSONS CONVICTED OF DRUG 
              OFFENSES FROM RECEIVING STUDENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.

    Subsection (r) of section 484 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
(20 U.S.C. 1091(r)) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

24. Unemployed persons by marital status, race, age, and sex

Marital status, race, and age

Men Women

Thousands of

persons

Unemployment

rates

Thousands of

persons

Unemployment

rates

2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002

 Total, 16 years and over ................................................ 3,690 4,597 4.8 5.9 3,111 3,781 4.7 5.6

Married, spouse present ................................................... 1,226 1,650 2.7 3.6 1,083 1,323 3.1 3.7

Widowed, divorced, or separated ..................................... 476 641 5.1 6.8 642 837 4.7 6.1

Single (never married) ...................................................... 1,988 2,306 8.9 10.3 1,386 1,621 7.7 8.9

 White, 16 years and over ............................................... 2,754 3,459 4.2 5.3 2,215 2,678 4.1 4.9

Married, spouse present ................................................... 981 1,319 2.5 3.3 864 1,048 2.8 3.4

Widowed, divorced, or separated ..................................... 364 505 4.7 6.5 474 624 4.4 5.8

Single (never married) ...................................................... 1,409 1,635 7.8 9.1 877 1,006 6.6 7.4

 Black, 16 years and over ............................................... 709 835 9.3 10.7 706 858 8.1 9.8

Married, spouse present ................................................... 154 216 4.5 6.0 123 165 4.3 5.8

Widowed, divorced, or separated ..................................... 88 106 7.4 8.7 137 171 6.1 7.6

Single (never married) ...................................................... 467 514 15.6 17.1 447 521 12.2 14.2

 Total, 25 years and over ................................................ 2,351 3,105 3.6 4.7 2,078 2,590 3.7 4.6

Married, spouse present ................................................... 1,159 1,566 2.6 3.5 984 1,209 2.9 3.5

Widowed, divorced, or separated ..................................... 455 617 5.0 6.7 601 782 4.5 5.9

Single (never married) ...................................................... 738 922 6.2 7.7 493 599 5.4 6.5

 White, 25 years and over ............................................... 1,781 2,381 3.2 4.3 1,514 1,854 3.3 4.0

Married, spouse present ................................................... 925 1,246 2.4 3.2 783 953 2.7 3.3

Widowed, divorced, or separated ..................................... 347 488 4.6 6.4 441 580 4.2 5.5

Single (never married) ...................................................... 509 647 5.4 6.9 291 321 4.7 5.1

 Black, 25 years and over ............................................... 423 514 6.7 8.0 426 555 5.8 7.6

Married, spouse present ................................................... 147 207 4.3 5.9 114 153 4.1 5.5

Widowed, divorced, or separated ..................................... 85 100 7.2 8.4 131 161 6.0 7.3

Single (never married) ...................................................... 191 207 10.7 11.7 181 241 7.7 10.1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000884504
<NAME> THERMOENERGY CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         411,275
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               411,275
<PP&E>                                          19,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                (19,809)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 994,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,078,539
<BONDS>                                      1,737,631
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,607
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,825,256)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   994,521
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  678,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             120,848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (486,964)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (486,964)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)


</TABLE>