alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Christopher T. KING, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-11144

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 2012.

Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jason Douglas Hawkins, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, William Reynolds Biggs, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*331Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Christopher T. King has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). King has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 132 (Monday, July 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16460]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Capacity Building Assistance (CBA) To Improve the 
Delivery and Effectiveness of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) 
Prevention Services for High-Risk and/or Racial/Ethnicity Minority 
Populations, Program Announcement Number PS09-906, Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting.

    Time and Date: 8:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m., July 28, 2009 (Closed).
    Place: CDC, Corporate Square Campus, 8 Corporate Boulevard, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30329.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include an initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Capacity Building Assistance (CBA) to Improve the 
Delivery and Effectiveness of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) 
Prevention Services for High-Risk and/or Racial/Ethnicity Minority 
Populations, PS09-906.'' The meeting was initially held June 15-18, 
2009. A reviewer conflict of interest was confirmed after the 
meeting commenced and a reviewer for another application was unable 
to participate due to sudden illness; therefore, the panel will be 
reconvened to review the affected applications.
    Contact Person for More Information: Monica Farmer, M.Ed., 
Public Health Analyst, Strategic Science and Program Unit, Office of 
the Director, Coordinating Center for Infectious Diseases, CDC, 1600 
Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E-60, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone: 
(404) 498-2277.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: July 7, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-16460 Filed 7-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Case 2:11-cv-01281-FSH-MAH Document 41 Filed 07/08/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1071
Notice of Dimissal

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

DIANE LITTLE-KING, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION

vs. ) FILE NO. 2:11-cv-03227-KSH -PS

)

) NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLES )

MANAGEMENT, INC. )

AKA ARM, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________)

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiff has filed with the Clerk of 

the District Court of New Jersey, Plaintiff’s Notice of Dismissal of Case With 

Prejudice.

 Respectfully submitted this 8th day of August, 2011.

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

Diane Little-King

/s/ Dennis R. Kurz

Dennis R. Kurz

NJ Bar No. 4570453

Weisberg & Meyers, LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiff

5025 N. Central Ave., #602

Phoenix, AZ 85012

(888) 595-9111 ext. 412

(866) 842-3303 (fax)

dkurz@attorneysforconsumers.com

Case 2:11-cv-03227-KSH-PS Document 5 Filed 08/08/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 16
Notice of Dimissal

Page 2 of 2

Notice Filed electronically on this 8th day of August, 2011, with: 

United States District Court CM/ECF system

Jessica DeCandia

s/Jessica DeCandia

Case 2:11-cv-03227-KSH-PS Document 5 Filed 08/08/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 17
EX-10.58



 Exhibit 10.58 
 English Translation 
 Form of Power of Attorney 

I,                     , citizen of the People’s
Republic of China (the “PRC”) with ID No. of                     , is the shareholder of Beijing Gamease Age Digital Technology Co., Ltd.
(“Gamease”) holding                      equity interest of Gamesase, hereby irrevocably appoint
                     with the following powers and rights during the term of this Power of Attorney: 

I hereby appoint                      to exercise, on
my behalf, all shareholder’s rights corresponding to the                      equity interests of Gamease in accordance with PRC laws and
Gamease’s Articles of Association at the shareholders’ meetings of Gamease, including but not limited to the right to call the shareholder’s meeting, accept the notice regarding the shareholder’s meeting and its agenda,
participate in the shareholder’s meeting and exercise the voting right (including elect, designate or appoint the director, general manager, financial controller or other senior management personnel, the matters of distribution of dividend), to
sell or transfer any or all of equity interests of Gamease. 
 Such authorization and appointment are based upon the precondition that
                     is acting as an employee of Beijing AmazGame Age Internet Technology Co., Ltd. (“AmazGame”) and AmazGame agrees in
written such authorization and appointment. Once                      loses his title or position in AmazGame or AmazGame notifies of the termination
of such authorization and appointment, I shall withdraw such authorization and appointment to him immediately and designate/authorize the other individual nominated by AmazGame to exercise the full aforesaid rights on behalf of myself at the
shareholders’ meetings of Gamease. If I die, I agree to transfer the right and obligation pursuant to this Power of Attorney to the person designated by AmazGame. 
 The initial term of this Power of Attorney is ten (10) years upon the execution date of this Power of Attorney during the duly existing term of Gamease unless the early termination of Operation
Agreement jointly executed by AmazGame and Gamease by any reason. If the term expires, upon the request by AmazGame, I will extend the term of this Power of Attorney. Within the term of this Power of Attorney, this Power of Attorney shall not be
revised or terminated without the consent of AmazGame. 
  

			
	
                  
       
	 	(Signature)
	
	                    , 2010



  
 1
Exhibit 23

LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

American Community Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Form S-8 Registration Statements No. 333-128833, 333-127746, 333-117778, 333-101208, 333-58278,
and 333-129991 of American Community Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated February 19, 2009, except for Note 25, as to which the date is March 26, 2009 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of American Community Bancshares,
Inc. and subsidiary, which report appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Community Bancshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008.

LOGO

Charlotte, North Carolina

March 26, 2009



111
Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW-LHG   Document 113-2   Filed 12/14/12   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 2510

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW-LHG   Document 113-2   Filed 12/14/12   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2511
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Hon. Dickinson R. Debevoise

v. : Crim. No. 11-132(DRD)

CARLOS E. ALMONTE : SCHEDULING ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the

application of defendant CARLOS E. ALMONTE (James Patton, Esq.,

appearing) and the government (Paul J. Fishman, United States

Attorney, counsel for the United States, L. Judson Welle and

Andrew Kogan, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, appearing), for a

scheduling order in this matter; and for good cause shown,

It is on this 3L day of March 2012

ORDERED that:

1. On or before April 17, 2012, defendant shall disclose

to the United States any reports and/or summaries of anticipated

testimony of the following who have been noticed as potential

expert witnesses on behalf of defendant: (a) Marc Sageman; and

(b) Yasir Qadhi.

2. The United States shall disclose to defendant its

responsive reports and/or summaries in this matter on a date to

be determined by the Court, which date shall be set following

defendant’s disclosures stated in Paragraph One of this Order.

1

Case 2:11-cr-00132-DRD Document 44 Filed 04/02/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 173
3. The parties, within two business days of the issuance

of the final Presentence Report, shall contact the Court to

schedule a status conference, During the status conference, the

parties shall submit proposed dates concerning the: (a)

submission of sentencing memoranda; (b) provision of notice

regarding the intent to call witnesses during the sentencing

hearing; and Cc) sentencing hearing.

t \/,—

15

HON. DICKINSON R. DEBEVOISE

United States Senior District Judge

2

Case 2:11-cr-00132-DRD Document 44 Filed 04/02/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 174
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 136 (Friday, July 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17051]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Amended Notice of 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, July 29, 2009, 
8 a.m. to July 30, 2009, 5 p.m., Ritz Carlton Hotel, 1150 22nd Street, 
NW., Washington, DC, 20037 which was published in the Federal Register 
on July 8, 2009, FRE9-16115.
    The meeting date was changed from July 29-30, 2009 to July 29, 
2009. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: July 10, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-17051 Filed 7-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Case 2:11-cv-03888-ES Document 8 Filed 11/10/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 66
Case 2:11-cv-03888-ES Document 8 Filed 11/10/11 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 67
Case 2:11-cv-03888-ES Document 8 Filed 11/10/11 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 68
Case 2:11-cv-03888-ES Document 8 Filed 11/10/11 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 69
Case 2:11-cv-03888-ES Document 8 Filed 11/10/11 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 70
#### Royer *v.*Shultz Belting Co.1

*(Circuit Court, E. D. Missouri,*

November 3, 1886.)

Trial—-Ordering Verdict.

Where tlie court would set a side the verdict *eo instante*if found for the plaintiff at the close of his case, it should instruct the jury to find for the defendant.

At Law. Motion by plaintiff for a now trial.

For report of trial, see 28 Fed. Rep. 850.

*M. A. Wheaton*and *Broadhead &*Hæussler, for plaintiff.

*Krum &*Jonas, for defendant.

1

 Edited by Benj. E. Rex, Esq., of the St. Louis bar.

Treat, J.,

*(orally.)*This case being for an alleged infringement of an expired patent under the recent rulings of the supreme court of the United States, it became necessary to go to the jury on the law side of the court. Those who have had any experience in this class of litigation know how difficult it is for 12 gentlemen, sitting in a jury-box, to go through an examination of a long series of patents, hurried as they must be, in order to reach a right conclusion; but the law devolves that duty upon them under proper circumstances.

The patent in this case of Boyer was before the jury, with the specifications and claims, and a draft, admitted to be correct, of the apparatus used by the defendant. The court instructed the jury to find for the defendant. In doing so it laid the strain of the case on what it believed to be non-infringement. True, the counsel for the defendant insisted very strenuously, as he lias on the motion now pending for a new trial, that the contrivances were not patentable, because there was no novelty, or no patentability I should say. The court did not consider that question, for the reason, to suit the convenience of the court and all concerned, it was suggested by the court that- the question of infringement should be at first considered, and, if there was an infringement, the court would then proceed, in proper order, to determine the patentability or non-patentability of plaintiff’s contrivance. The ground on which the court instructed the jury, as stated orally at the time, was that, admitting the plaintiff’s patent to he valid, the defendant did not infringe. The reasons were then stated, and are preserved in the record. I have seen no reason to change my view with regard to the non-infringement by the defendant of plaintiff’s patent. I held up the case on another question,— whether, inasmuch as the patentee, being a witness on the stand, said that the defendant’s machine was substantially the same as described in his patent, it should not have been submitted to the jury. Now, the case referred to in 13 Wall., and succeeding cases, as I understand them, are practically these: that, where a court should set *282aside the verdict *eo instante*if found for the plaintiff at the close of the plaintiff’s case, it could instruct the jury to find for the defendant, thus saving time, costs, expenses, and annoyance. It was upon that doctrine, which I understand to be the doctrine now laid down by the supreme court, that the jury were instructed to find for the plaintiff.

There is no error. Therefore the motion will be overruled.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JESSIE J. CRAWLEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 372 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of February, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Case 2:11-cv-03950-SRC -MAS Document 29 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 746
Case 2:11-cv-03950-SRC -MAS Document 29 Filed 08/04/11 Page 2 of 6 PageID: 747
Case 2:11-cv-03950-SRC -MAS Document 29 Filed 08/04/11 Page 3 of 6 PageID: 748
Case 2:11-cv-03950-SRC -MAS Document 29 Filed 08/04/11 Page 4 of 6 PageID: 749
Case 2:11-cv-03950-SRC -MAS Document 29 Filed 08/04/11 Page 5 of 6 PageID: 750
Case 2:11-cv-03950-SRC -MAS Document 29 Filed 08/04/11 Page 6 of 6 PageID: 751
Case 3:11-cv-03764-AET -DEA Document 28 Filed 04/09/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 315
Case 3:11-cv-03764-AET -DEA Document 28 Filed 04/09/12 Page 2 of 7 PageID: 316
Case 3:11-cv-03764-AET -DEA Document 28 Filed 04/09/12 Page 3 of 7 PageID: 317
Case 3:11-cv-03764-AET -DEA Document 28 Filed 04/09/12 Page 4 of 7 PageID: 318
Case 3:11-cv-03764-AET -DEA Document 28 Filed 04/09/12 Page 5 of 7 PageID: 319
Case 3:11-cv-03764-AET -DEA Document 28 Filed 04/09/12 Page 6 of 7 PageID: 320
Case 3:11-cv-03764-AET -DEA Document 28 Filed 04/09/12 Page 7 of 7 PageID: 321
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold Closed Meetings on Monday, July 20, 2009 at 3 p.m. and on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meetings. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meetings.

Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meetings in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meetings scheduled for Monday, July 20, 2009 and Tuesday, July 21, 2009 will be: Post-argument discussions.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: July 13, 2009.

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-17001 Filed 7-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS

NEWARK DATE: July 21, 2011 

 

JUDGE: Susan D. Wigenton

 

COURT REPORTER: Carmen Liloia

 

DEPUTY CLERK: Antigone Owens-Krefski

Title of Case: Docket #11-470 

 

U.S.A. v. ANDREW AUERNHEIMER

 

Appearances:

Zach Intrater, AUSA for the Gov’t

Candace Hom, Esq. for Dft

 

Nature of proceedings: Arraignment on Indictment

Dft advised of charges in the Indictment and pled Not Guilty to all

Counts of the Indictment.

Order for Discovery and Inspection filed

Motions due: 8/22/11

Opposition due: 9/5/11

Motion hearing: 9/12/11

Trial: 9/13/11

Ordered bail continued.

Time commenced 9:45 a.m.

Time Adjourned 9:50 a.m.

cc: chambers Antigone Owens-Krefski 

 Deputy Clerk

Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 27 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 87
Case 2:11-cv-03614-FSH-PS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 15
Case 2:11-cv-03614-FSH-PS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 16
Case 2:11-cv-01936-KSH-PS Document 27 Filed 05/02/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 214
Case 2:11-cv-01936-KSH-PS Document 27 Filed 05/02/12 Page 2 of 6 PageID: 215
Case 2:11-cv-01936-KSH-PS Document 27 Filed 05/02/12 Page 3 of 6 PageID: 216
Case 2:11-cv-01936-KSH-PS Document 27 Filed 05/02/12 Page 4 of 6 PageID: 217
Case 2:11-cv-01936-KSH-PS Document 27 Filed 05/02/12 Page 5 of 6 PageID: 218
Case 2:11-cv-01936-KSH-PS Document 27 Filed 05/02/12 Page 6 of 6 PageID: 219
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 519

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 20, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a 

study of the San Gabriel River Watershed, and for other 

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 519 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘San Gabriel River Wa3 tershed Study Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. STUDY OF SAN GABRIEL RIVER WATERSHED. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior 

6 (hereafter in this Act referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall 

7 conduct a special resource study of the following areas: 

8 (1) The San Gabriel River and its tributaries 

9 north of and including the city of Santa Fe Springs. 

10 (2) The San Gabriel Mountains within the ter11 ritory of the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles 

12 Rivers and Mountains Conservancy (as defined in 

13 section 32603(c)(1)(C) of the State of California 

14 Public Resource Code). 

15 (b) STUDY CONDUCT AND COMPLETION.—Section 

16 8(c) of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)) shall 

17 apply to the conduct and completion of the study con18 ducted under this section. 

19 (c) CONSULTATION WITH FEDERAL, STATE, AND

20 LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.—In conducting the study under 

21 this section, the Secretary shall consult with the San Ga22 briel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Con23 servancy and other appropriate Federal, State, and local 

24 governmental entities. 

25 (d) CONSIDERATIONS.—In conducting the study 

26 under this section, the Secretary shall consider regional 
3

HR 519 RFS 

1 flood control and drainage needs and publicly owned infra2 structure such as wastewater treatment facilities. 

3 SEC. 3. REPORT. 

4 Not later than 3 years after funds are made available 

5 for this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee 

6 on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the 

7 Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives 

8 a report on the findings, conclusions, and recommenda9 tions of the study.

Passed the House of Representatives March 19, 

2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

PETER MANUEL CANDELARIA,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00011

- CR

Appeal from the

118th District Court

of Howard County, Texas

(TC#15,560)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no reversible

error in the judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 23RD OF APRIL, 2021.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
ex109.htm






  





  











  








Exhibit 10.9


Schedule of Board Fees












The Compensation Committee and Board of Directors of Lakeland Financial Corporation adopted the following fee schedule effective January 1, 2013:


 



	
Annual Director Retainer:

	  	
$

	
25,000

	  	  
	
Annual Audit Committee Chairman Retainer:

	  	
$

	
35,000

	  	  
	
Annual Lead Director and Compensation Committee Chairman Retainer:

	  	
$

	
35,000

	  	  
	
Annual Governance Committee Chairman Retainer:

	  	
$

	
30,000

	  	  
	
Annual Corporate Risk Committee Chairman Retainer

	  	
$

	
30,000

	  	  
	
Board Meeting Fee:

	  	
$

	
1,000

	  	
per meeting


	
Committee Meeting Fee:

	  	
$

	
1,000

	  	
per meeting


	
Annual stock grant:

	  	  	
1,250

	  	
shares