alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd.

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Alpha ProTech, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Sheldon Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer and Directorof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| DATE:  | **August 11, 2010** | ** ** | BY:    | /s/ **Sheldon Hoffman**              |
|--------|--------------------------|------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |                     |       |   | Sheldon Hoffman                      |
|   |                     |       |   | Chief Executive Officer and Director |

 

1

----
Exhibit 31.1.1

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302

I, Thomas A. Bologna, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Orchid Cellmark Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 30, 2009



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/ THOMAS A. BOLOGNA                
|Thomas A. Bologna                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs.

MITCHELL KURLANDER and

ALAN ABESHAUS,

Defendants.

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the application of Defendant Alan

Abeshaus, through his attorneys, Marino, Tortorella & Boyle, P.C. (Kevin H. Marino, Esq.,

appearing) for an Order continuing the trial date in this matter from Tuesday, March 19, 2013 to

Tuesday, April 2, 2013; and the Government (Lee Cortes, AUSA and J. Fortier Imbert, AUSA,

appearing) and Defendant Mitchell Kurlander, through its attorneys, Stevens & Lee (William A.

DeStefano, Esq. and Tern Paweiski, Esq., appearing) having consented to this adjournment; and

good cause having been shown;

IT IS on this/iday of March, 2013,

ORDERED that the trial in this matter be and hereby is adjourned from Tuesday, March

19, 2013, to Tuesday, April 2, 2013

/ I / I

United States Senior District Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case No. 11-cr-00315 (WHW)

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE
#### HIRSCH v. SCOPARINO et al.

Civ. A. No. 9162.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

April 4, 1950.

Irving Berkelhammer, New York City, for plaintiff.

Henry L. Burkitt, New York City, for defendants.

KENNEDY, District Judge.

This is a motion for summary judgment.

The complaint (in two counts) charges the defendants with infringement of two patents embodying improvements in the making of a doll, and also with unfair competition in respect of the same product. I consider myself bound by a prior decision in the case filed by Chief Judge Inch sustaining the unfair competition count and holding that this claim is, to quote defendants’ brief: “one and the same thing as the patent action, under the doctrine of Hurn v. Oursler, 289 U.S. 238, 53 S.Ct. 586, *77*L.Ed. 1148.”

The motion for summary judgment is based on the contention that a mere visual examination of the accused product, coupled with analysis of the patents, is enough to warrant a finding and conclusion that the patents are not infringed. There is no occasion for me to discuss generally the question whether the summary judgment rule, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 56, 28 U.S.C.A., is or is not appropriate in patent cases. The matter has been dealt with before, Weil v. N. J. Richman Co., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 1940, 34 F.Supp. 401; E. W. Bliss Co. v. Cold Metal Process Co., D.C. N.D.Ohio, 142, 47 F.Supp. 897; Millburn Mills, Inc., v. Meister, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 1940, 4 Fed.Rules Service 741; Brown v. Ford Motor Co., D.C.E.D.Mich., 1944, 57 F.Supp. 825; Avrick v. Rockmont Envelope Co., 10 Cir., 1946, 155 F.2d 568; Steigleder v. Eberhard Faber Pencil Co., D.C., 81 F.Supp. 143; Vulcan Corp. v. International Shoe Machine Corp., D.C.Mass., 1946, 68 F.Supp. 990, affirmed 1 Cir., 158 F.2d 520, certiorari denied 330 U.S. 825, 67 S.Ct. 868, 91 L.Ed. 1275. Plaintiff in this case seems to have been reluctant to proceed to trial, and defendants’ argument that there is no possibility of infringement comes close to being persuasive. However, I cannot say that there is lacking a substantial issue because, under the prior ruling of the Chief Judge, jurisdiction to determine the unfair competition claim will survive the disposition of the claim asserted under the letters patent. That being so, it seems clear that any effort to save time by disposing of the infringement issue would be a mistake, cf. Bozant v. Bank of New York, 2 Cir., 1946, 156 F.2d 787.

While I feel that I must deny the motion, I suggest to counsel for the plaintiff that the case should be promptly tried.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5100 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5100

To reinstate for 10 years the repealed criminal provisions relating to 
     assault weapons and large capacity ammunition feeding devices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 15, 2004

Mrs. McCarthy of New York (for herself, Mr. Hoeffel, Mr. Ferguson, and 
 Mr. Castle) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reinstate for 10 years the repealed criminal provisions relating to 
     assault weapons and large capacity ammunition feeding devices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Neighborhood Security Act''.

SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT FOR 10 YEARS OF REPEALED CRIMINAL PROVISIONS 
              RELATING TO ASSAULT WEAPONS AND LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION 
              FEEDING DEVICES.

    (a) Reinstatement of Provisions Wholly Repealed.--Paragraphs (30) 
and (31) of section 921(a), subsections (v) and (w) and Appendix A of 
section 922, and the last 2 sentences of section 923(i) of title 18, 
United States Code, as in effect just before the repeal made by section 
110105(2) of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, 
are hereby enacted into law.
    (b) Reinstatement of Provisions Partially Repealed.--Section 924 of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking subparagraph (B) and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(B) knowingly violates subsection (a)(4), (f), (k), (r), 
        (v), or (w) of section 922;''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(1)(B), by striking clause (i) and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(i) is a short-barreled rifle, short-barreled shotgun, or 
        semiautomatic assault weapon, the person shall be sentenced to 
        a term of imprisonment of not less than 10 years; or''.
    (c) Sunset.--Effective 10 years after the date of the enactment of 
this section--
            (1) the provisions enacted by subsection (a) of this 
        section are repealed; and
            (2) section 924 of title 18, United States Code, is 
        amended--
                    (A) in subsection (a)(1)(B), by striking ``(r), 
                (v), or (w)'' and inserting ``or (r)''; and
                    (B) in subsection (c)(1)(B)(i), by striking 
                ``short-barreled shotgun, or semiautomatic assault 
                weapon'' and inserting ``or short-barreled shotgun''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 13.2

  CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b)) OR
RULE 15d-14(b) (17 CFR 240.15d-14(b)) AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
OF THE UNITED STATES CODE (18 U.S.C. 1350), PROMULGATED UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Havas, a French company
(the "Company") for the year ended December 3l, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Havas hereby certifies, to
such officer's knowledge, that the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 9, 2006


                                    By: /s/ Herve Philippe
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Herve Philippe
                                    Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                           (principal financial officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document
and will not be deemed "filed" for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
Section.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5282 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5282

           To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic blue 154.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 2004

 Mr. Wilson of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic blue 154.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON BASIC BLUE 154.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.32.01      Basic blue 154      Free         No Change        No Change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 159064-                                                   31/2007
                         94-1) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         3204.13.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 EXTERRAN PARTNERS, L.P.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 *
 (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ DANIEL K. SCHLANGER

Daniel K. SchlangerChief Financial Officer, UCO GP, LLCAs General Partner of UCO General Partner, LPAs General Partner of Exterran Compression Partners, L.P.
  
 *
    
    This report presents the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant and the results of operations and cash flow of the registrants predecessor,
the natural gas contract operations business that was provided in the United States of America
by Universal Compression Holdings and its subsidiaries.
Case 3:11-mj-02503-DEA   Document 2   Filed 03/01/11   Page 1 of 1 PageID: 4
Case 2:11-cv-04052-JLL-JAD Document 203 Filed 08/19/16 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 5380
THE MCDANIEL LAW FIRM, PC 

54 Main Street 

Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 

(201) 845-3232 

(201) 845-3777 - facsimile 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Baseprotect UG, Ltd. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

BASEPROTECT UG, LTD., a German 

Corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

JOHN DOES 1-X (such persons being 

presently unknown), 

 Defendants. 

 

Civ. Action. No. 2:11-cv-03621(CCC)(JAD) 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

AS TO IP ADDRESS 68.108.127.150 ONLY

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Plaintiff BASEPROTECT UG, LTD., by its undersigned attorney, hereby voluntarily 

dismisses, without prejudice, the above-captioned matter pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) as 

to the defendant identified by Internet Protocol address 68.108.127.150 ONLY. No answer or 

motion for summary judgment has been served in this action by this defendant. 

DATED: November 4, 2011 THE MCDANIEL LAW FIRM, P.C. 

 By: 

 Jay R. McDaniel, Esq. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Baseprotect UG, Ltd.

DATED: 

 _________________________________________ 

 Hon. Joseph A. Dickson,, U.S.M.J. 

Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 96 Filed 11/04/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 842
Exhibit
32.2




Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of
Title 18 of the United States Code






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NTR Acquisition Co. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, William E. Hantke, Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






/s/
      William E. HantkeWilliam
      E. HantkePrincipal
      Financial OfficerAugust
      ___, 2008




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has
been provided to NTR Acquisition Co. and will be retained by NTR Acquisition Co.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 10.8

 

 

January 11, 2008                 Re: Service about being independent director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of China Pharma Holdings, Inc                  Dear Mr.Yingwen Zhang         On behalf of the Board of Directions and the Company, I am pleased to welcome you to join the Board of the China Pharma Holdings, Inc as an independent director and Chairman of the Audit Committee. I look forward to working with you. Your starting date will be the date of the board approves your engagement and your engagement for this term will end on the date of the next annual shareholders meeting.                  Your compensation will consist of the following:

|  | 1)      | A retainer ofRMB 40,000 per year, payable quarterly within 5 days of the start of the quarter; |
|--|----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

If you agree to the terms and conditions stated above, please sign and date this letter below.                  I look forward to working with you and sincerely hope that your service will be enjoyable and rewarding.                  Sincerely                                    Chairman of the Board         China Pharma Holdings, Inc                           Response:        This letter correctly sets forth the understanding of Mr.Yingwen Zhang.                 By: ____________________________

Date:___________________________
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5282

To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic blue 154. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 7, 2004

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic blue 154.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON BASIC BLUE 154. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.32.01 Basic blue 154 (CAS No. 

159064–94–1) (provided for 

in subheading 3204.13.60) .. Free No Change No Change On or before 

12/31/2007 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 5282 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
HOUSEHOLD DATA HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES ANNUAL AVERAGES

34. Unemployed jobseekers by sex, reason for unemployment, and active jobsearch methods used

Sex and reason

2008

Thousands of

persons Methods used as a percent of total jobseekers

Average

number

of

methods

used

Total

unemployed

Total

jobseekers

Employer

directly

Sent out

resumes

or filled

out

applications

Placed

or

answered

ads

Friends

or

relatives

Public

employment

agency

Private

employment

agency

Other

 Total, 16 years and over ......................................................... 8,924 7,749 56.9 52.3 17.1 23.8 18.9 8.0 14.1 1.92

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs 1 ........ 4,789 3,614 59.5 51.4 20.1 28.0 24.3 10.6 15.2 2.10

Job leavers ............................................................................... 896 896 58.7 54.8 18.3 22.5 16.9 7.8 13.2 1.93

Reentrants ................................................................................ 2,472 2,472 53.3 51.7 14.0 19.5 14.6 5.9 14.0 1.73

New entrants ............................................................................ 766 766 54.5 55.1 11.2 19.3 9.9 3.4 10.8 1.64

 Men, 16 years and over .......................................................... 5,033 4,234 58.7 49.8 17.1 26.1 19.3 8.1 14.2 1.94

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs 1 ........ 3,055 2,255 61.0 48.7 19.5 29.9 23.7 10.2 15.0 2.08

Job leavers ............................................................................... 458 458 59.2 52.6 17.9 24.2 16.9 7.2 13.2 1.92

Reentrants ................................................................................ 1,128 1,128 55.1 49.1 14.0 21.0 14.9 6.0 14.1 1.75

New entrants ............................................................................ 393 393 55.9 54.9 11.8 21.4 9.5 3.0 10.8 1.67

 Women, 16 years and over .................................................... 3,891 3,515 54.7 55.3 17.0 21.0 18.4 8.0 14.1 1.89

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs 1 ........ 1,735 1,359 57.1 56.0 21.1 24.9 25.2 11.2 15.6 2.12

Job leavers ............................................................................... 438 438 58.1 57.1 18.8 20.7 17.0 8.5 13.2 1.94

Reentrants ................................................................................ 1,345 1,345 51.8 54.0 14.0 18.3 14.2 5.8 13.9 1.73

New entrants ............................................................................ 374 374 53.1 55.2 10.5 17.1 10.3 3.7 10.7 1.61

1 Data on the number of jobseekers and the jobsearch methods used exclude

persons on temporary layoff.

 NOTE: The jobseekers total is less than the total unemployed because it does

not include persons on temporary layoff. The percent using each method will

always total more than 100 because many jobseekers use more than one method.

Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January

data.

246
0

2

4

6

8

10

12

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004

Chart 1-16. Consumer prices usually increase more slowly 

than private employers' compensation costs

Percent change from previous year

Consumer Price Index

Employment Cost Index

NOTE: The Employment Cost Index is for private-sector workers. The Consumer Price Index is the CPI-U-RS research series. 

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Chart 1-16. Consumer prices usually increase more slowly 

than private employers' compensation costs

• The Employment Cost Index (ECI) measures the costs to employers of both 

employee wages and benefits, and the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measures 

the average change in prices paid by consumers for a variety of goods and 

services. 

• Changes in the ECI and the CPI have tracked fairly closely over time, though 

increases in the CPI tend to be smaller than those for the ECI. 

• In 2005, however, increases in consumer prices exceeded growth in private 

employers' compensation costs.
V.

DANIEL M. FURESZ

Hon. Peter C, Sheridan

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on pro se Defendant Daniel M. Furesz’s motion to

withdraw his guilty plea (ECF No. 53.); and the Court having considered the papers submitted by

the parties; and the Court having heard oral argument on said motion on April 26, 2011; and for thereasons stated on the record on April 26, 2011 and May 9, 2011; and for good cause shown;

IT IS on this 9th day of May 2011, ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to withdraw his

guilty plea is denied. (ECF No. 53.)

I-’

i_)

PETER C. SHERIDAN, U.S.D.J.

May 9, 2011
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 20 Filed 02/28/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 59
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 20 Filed 02/28/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 60
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 20 Filed 02/28/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 61