alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SJW 2012 Q4 10K Exhibit 10.61




EXHIBIT 10.61
2013 PERFORMANCE GOALS FOR
CEO SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE BONUS
	
			
	Performance Criteria
	Goals and Minimum and Maximum Thresholds
	Allocation of Target Amount ($) (1)

	San Jose Water 
Company Return on 
Equity for the 2013 
Fiscal Year
	Target Goal:  9.45% 


Minimum Threshold:  7.00%


Maximum Goal:   At least 11.00%
	$54,167

	Compliance (Environmental) (2)
	Maximum Goal:  No material water quality or environmental violations (Goal and Minimum Threshold are not applicable).
	$54,167

	San Jose Water 
Company 
Operational Goals 
	Target Goal:  Achieve 80% of identified key water industry objectives measured primarily in terms of service, reliability and efficiency. 


Minimum Threshold:  Achieve 70% of identified water industry objectives. 


Maximum Goal:  Achieve 90% of identified key water industry objectives.
	$54,166










		
	1)
	The target 2013 annual cash bonus amount is equal to $162,500, which is 25 percent of Mr. Roth’s 2013 base salary per his employment agreement. The actual bonus attributable to each performance goal may range from 0 to 150 percent of the portion of the target bonus amount allocated to that goal. Based on the Committee determination of the level of achievement of each performance goal, the amount payable with respect to that goal will be as follows:




		
	•
	If the goal is attained at target level, 100 percent of the allocated amount will be paid.  


		
	•
	If the goal is only attained at the minimum level, then 50 percent of the allocated amount will be paid.  


		
	•
	If the goal is attained at or above maximum level, then 150 percent of the allocated amount will be paid.


		
	•
	Should the actual level of attainment of any such performance goal be between two of the designated levels, then the bonus potential with respect to that goal will be interpolated on a straight-line basis.




		
	2)
	“No material water quality or environmental violations” means the absence of citations with material fines issued by state or federal environmental regulators in the performance year in connection with violations which occurred in the performance year.  A material fine will be deemed to occur if the amount of the fine exceeds $25,000 in any one instance or $100,000 in the aggregate for the year.
EX-31.1
   RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF JAMES H. ALEXANDER

             RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, James H. Alexander, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of World Am,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period] for
the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: April 20, 2005                  /s/ James H. Alexander
                                       James H. Alexander
                                       President/Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, July 20, 2009, 8 a.m. to July 21, 2009, 5 p.m., Melrose Hotel, 2430 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20037 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 15, 2009, 74 FR 28260-28262.                 

The meeting will be held at the Ritz Carlton Hotel, 1150 22nd Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037. The meeting dates and time remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public. 

Dated: July 7, 2009. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

 [FR Doc. E9-16571 Filed 7-13-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**Exhibit
      31.1**




CERTIFICATION




I,
      Bo
      Huang, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the nine moths transition period
      ended September 30, 2007, of Sinoenergy Corporation;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors:




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Dated:
                December 27, 2007
            
            /s/ Bo
              HuangChief
                Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

: ORDER

 VS. 

:

JOSEPH KEOSSEIAN

 : CR. NO.3:11-361-1 (FLW)

 Defendant

:

The financial inability of the defendant to retain counsel having been established by the

Court, and the defendant not having waived the appointment of counsel, 

It is on this 15th day of August, 2018,

 

ORDERED that Saverio Viggiano, AFPD from the Office of the Federal Public Defender 

for the District of New Jersey is hereby appointed to represent said defendant in this cause until 

further order of the Court.

 s/Freda L. Wolfson 

FREDA L. WOLFSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: Federal Public Defender
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,307

EX PARTE JOSEPH DENNIS LEWIS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1060932-A IN THE 178 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to life imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Lewis

v. State, No. 14-07-00377-CR (Tex. App. - Houston [14 Dist.], May 29, 2008). 

th

Applicant contends that he was denied the opportunity to petition this Court for discretionary

review, because counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and

failed to advise him of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. Appellate counsel filed
2

an affidavit with the trial court, indicating that he timely mailed the notification to Applicant. We

remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.

 The record has now been supplemented with an affidavit and authenticated copies of the

prison mail logs from Applicant’s unit during the applicable period of time. Based on those

documents, the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that Applicant did not

timely receive the notification from appellate counsel that his conviction had been affirmed and that

he had a right to petition for discretionary review pro se. See Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex.

Crim. App. 2006). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-oftime petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause

No. 14-07-00377-CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 1060932-A from the 178th Judicial

District Court of Harris County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with the

Fourteenth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: March 3, 2010

Do not publish
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4968

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 7, 2004

Received 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 25 McHenry Street in Rosine, Kentucky, as 

the ‘‘Bill Monroe Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 4968 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 25 McHenry Street in Rosine, Kentucky, shall 

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘Bill Monroe Post Of5 fice’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Bill Monroe Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 6, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 6

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                        1,142,958
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                       1,828,519
<RECEIVABLES>                                  341,058
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                       0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,118,009
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                             53,159
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                             0
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                            1,771
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                            1,783
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                    2,081,253
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                         50,353
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                             0
<NET-ASSETS>                                 2,064,850
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                               31,550
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                                  28,082
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              0
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                      (10,265)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                     (12,172)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                         (12,172)
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                              0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                          0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                          15,252
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                            0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                            5,180
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                 28,082
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                         2,064,449
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                          1165.15
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   1.02
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                              0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                            0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                            1166.17
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   1.36




</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5090 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the credit 

for producing fuel from a nonconventional source shall apply to gas 

produced onshore from a formation more than 15,000 feet deep. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2004 

Mr. COLE (for himself, Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. ISTOOK, 

and Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

that the credit for producing fuel from a nonconventional 

source shall apply to gas produced onshore from a formation more than 15,000 feet deep. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Natural Gas Produc5 tion Act of 2004’’. 
2 

•HR 5090 IH 

1 SEC. 2. CREDIT FOR PRODUCING FUEL FROM NONCONVEN2 TIONAL SOURCE TO APPLY TO GAS PRO3 DUCED ONSHORE FROM FORMATIONS MORE 

4 THAN 15,000 FEET DEEP. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

6 29(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining 

7 qualified fuels) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end 

8 of clause (i), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of clause (ii) 

9 and inserting ‘‘or’’, and by inserting after clause (ii) the 

10 following new clause: 

11 ‘‘(iii) an onshore well from a forma12 tion more than 15,000 feet deep, and’’. 

13 (b) ELIGIBLE WELLS.—Section 29 of such Code is 

14 amended by adding at the end the following new sub15 section: 

16 ‘‘(h) ELIGIBLE DEEP GAS WELL WELLS.—In the 

17 case of a well producing qualified fuel described in sub18 paragraph (B)(iii)— 

19 ‘‘(1) for purposes of subsection (f)(1)(A), such 

20 well shall be treated as drilled before January 1, 

21 1993, if such well is drilled after the date of the en22 actment of this subsection, and 

23 ‘‘(2) subsection (f)(2) shall not apply.’’ 
3 

•HR 5090 IH 

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the 

3 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### Joseph ZHEMECK v. J. H. WINCHESTER *&*CO. and Liberty Navigation and Trading Co., Inc. (two cases).

Admiralty No. 113/58, Civ. A. No. 24591.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

Dec. 15, 1958.

Stark & Goldstein, Herman Moskowitz, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Rawle & Henderson, Harrison G. Kil-dare, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.

GRIM, District Judge.

These actions arise out of an illness plaintiff suffered while a seaman on the steamship Josefina. Process was served on Lavino Shipping Company in this district as agent for both defendants. Liberty Navigation and Trading Co., Inc. has moved to set aside the service and to dismiss in both actions. J. H. Winchester & Co. has joined in Liberty’s *9motion in the civil action and has entered an appearance in the admiralty action.

Liberty is the owner of the Josefina. Winchester & Co., a partnership with offices in New York City, acted as agent for the owner. Neither defendant has offices or property in this district. Liberty is a corporation of an unknown state, with offices in Connecticut and Delaware. Liberty owns another vessel, the Barbara Freitche, which was in Philadelphia April 6-10, 1952, May 22-30, 1953, July 7-9, 1954, and August 11-19, 1954. The Josefina was in Philadelphia October 3-6, 1956, and at no other time. On each of these occasions Lavino acted as agent in Philadelphia for the particular vessel on the instructions of Winchester & Co. Lavino’s activities with respect to the Josefina included obtaining stores, arranging for repairs, tugs, and docking, and redelivery of the ship from the charterer. Lavino presumably acted similarly with respect to the Barbara Freitche. Lavino’s last transaction involving either vessel was the sending of the disbursement account of the Josefina on December 26,1956. There was no continuing agency agreement with Lavino, and arrangements were made individually as each ship was bound for Philadelphia. Beyond the facts above stated, the only evidence that Lavino was agent for the defendants at those times consists of statements in the marshal’s returns that Lavino was served “as agent.”

F.R.Civ.P. 4(d) (3), 28 U.S.C. authorizes service “Upon a domestic or foreign corporation or upon a partnership * * by delivering [the process] * * * to * * * a managing or general agent, or to any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process * *

I find this evidence insufficient to establish that at the time when process was served on it Lavino was the agent of Winchester or Liberty, and since it was not then their agent the service was invalid. Holland v. Parry Navigation Co., D.C.E.D.Pa.1947, 7 F.R.D. 471.'

The motions of Liberty Navigation and Trading Co., Inc. to set aside service in both actions will be granted. The motion of J. H. Winchester & Co. to set aside service in the civil action will be granted. The motions to dismiss will be refused. Thompson v. Trent Maritime Company, D.C.E.D.Pa.1957, 149 F.Supp. 468.

The motion of Liberty Navigation and Trading Co., Inc. for leave to file an amended affidavit is granted.
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed February 23 , 20 12

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00 024

- CV

____________ JOHN J. PRESTON AND MONICA S. PRESTON , Appellant s

V.

MICHAEL A. INGLIS AND ALLEN GREGORY ALPER , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 122nd District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10CV2676



### MEM O RANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from a judgment signed September 23 , 20 12

.
On February 9 , 20 12
, appellants filed a n unopposed motion to reverse the judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties ' settlement agreement. See Tex. R. App

. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.
Accordingly, we reverse the judgment signed September 23 , 20 12 , and we remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties ' agreement.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Brown, and Boyce.
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 18 Filed 02/28/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 57
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JESSIE J. CRAWLEY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 372 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of February, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.