alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 572 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 572

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
              on capital losses applicable to individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2003

 Mr. Fossella introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
              on capital losses applicable to individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON CAPITAL LOSSES APPLICABLE TO 
              INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 1211(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limitation on capital losses for 
taxpayers other than corporations) is amended by striking ``$3,000 
($1,500'' and inserting ``$8,250 (1/2 such amount''.
    (b) Adjustment for Inflation.--Section 1211 of such Code (relating 
to limitation on capital losses) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subsection:
    ``(c) Adjustment for Inflation.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of any taxable year 
        beginning in a calendar year after 2003, the $8,250 amount 
        contained in subsection (b)(1) shall be increased by an amount 
        equal to--
                    ``(A) such amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins by substituting `calendar year 
                2002' for `calendar year 1992' in subparagraph (B) 
                thereof.
            ``(2) Rounding.--If any increase determined under paragraph 
        (1) is not a multiple of $50, such increase shall be rounded to 
        the next highest multiple of $50.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 99.1**ANNUAL MASTER SERVICER’S CERTIFICATEGE DEALER FLOORPLAN MASTER NOTE TRUST     The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of General Electric Capital Corporation(“GECC”), as the master servicer (the“Master Servicer ”), pursuant to theServicing Agreement dated as of August 12, 2004 (as may be further amended and supplemented fromtime to time, the “Agreement”), between GECC and GE Dealer Floorplan Master Note Trust(“Trust”), does hereby certify that:     1. GECC is, as of the date hereof, Master Servicer under the Agreement.     2. The undersigned is an authorized officer who is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreementto execute and deliver this certificate to the Trust.     3. A review of the activities of Master Servicer during the fiscal year ended December 31,2005, and of its performance under the Agreement was conducted under my supervision.     4. Based on such review, Master Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, performed in allmaterial respects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year and no default in theperformance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate this 31st day of March,2006.                                                           /s/ Michael Cipolla   Name:  Michael Cipolla   Title:  Principal Servicing Officer
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

CRUZ-GARCIA, OBEL CAUSE NUMBER WR-85,051-02

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ORDER

The above styled and numbered cause is before this Court on Application for Writ of 

Habeas Corpus pursuant to Art. 11.071 stemming from Applicant’s Capital Murder conviction in 

Cause No. 1384794-A from the 337th District Court of Harris County.

Exhibits Nos. 1 - 36 are ordered returned to the District Clerk of Harris county.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021

PER CURIAM

EN BANC

DO NOT PUBLISH

FILE COPY
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 642 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 642

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that certain 
    deductions of school bus owner-operators shall be allowable in 
                    computing adjusted gross income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2003

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that certain 
    deductions of school bus owner-operators shall be allowable in 
                    computing adjusted gross income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``School Bus Driver Tax Fairness Act 
of 2003''.

SEC. 2. DEDUCTIONS OF SCHOOL BUS OWNER-OPERATORS ALLOWABLE IN COMPUTING 
              ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 62(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain trade and business deductions 
of employees) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(E) Certain expenses of school bus owner-
                operators.--The deductions allowed by part VI (section 
                161 and following) which consist of expenses paid or 
                incurred by the taxpayer in connection with the 
                performance by the taxpayer of services as an employee 
                while driving a school bus (as defined in section 
                4221(d)(7)(C)) owned by the employee.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 17, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131035 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, HARVEY GRACE, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 131035 

 COA: 257896 

Oakland CC: 2002-045572-NM 

BRUCE LEITMAN and BRUCE 

LEITMAN, P.C., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 

7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether the proffered affidavit 

from plaintiff's expert witness was sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact, in 

light of the principles discussed in Simko v Blake, 448 Mich 648 (1995), and other 

applicable law. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 35 days of the date of 

this order, but they should avoid submitting a mere restatement of the arguments made in 

their application papers. 

d1114 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 17, 2006 

 Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) National Advisory Council (NAC) will meet on August 5, 2009 from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. via teleconference.

The meeting will include the review, discussion, and evaluation of grant applications reviewed by Initial Review Groups. Therefore, the meeting will be closed to the public as determined by the Administrator, SAMHSA, in accordance with Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (6) and 5 U.S.C. App.2, Section 10(d).

                    Substantive program information, a summary of the meeting and a roster of Council members may be obtained as soon as possible after the meeting, either by accessing the SAMHSA Committee Web site at                     *http://www.samhsa.gov/​council/​csap/​csapnac.aspx*, or by contacting the CSAP National Advisory Council's Acting Designated Federal Official, Ms. Joyce Weddington (                    *see*                     contact information below).                

*Committee Name:*                         SAMHSA Center for Substance Abuse Prevention National Advisory Council.                    

*Date/Time/Type:*                         August 5, 2009, 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.: Closed.                    

*Place:*                         SAMHSA Building, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Conference Room 4-1058, Rockville, Maryland 20857.                    

*Contact:*                         Joyce Weddington, Acting Designated Federal Official, SAMHSA CSAP National Advisory Council, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Room 4-1065, Rockville, Maryland 20857,                         *Telephone:*                         (240) 276-2448,                         *Fax:*                         (240)276-2430,                         *E-mail:**joyce.weddington@samhsa.hhs.gov*.                    

Dated: July 10, 2009.

Toian Vaughn,

Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-17143 Filed 7-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
3ioUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS

OFFICE: TRENTON DATE: August 12, 2015

JUDGE MARY L. COOPER 

COURT REPORTERS: Regina Tell

TITLE OF CASE: CV11-3962(MLC) 

HELSINN HEALTHCARE S.A. 

v.

DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. 

 

APPEARANCES:

Joseph O’Malley, Esq., Eric Dittman, Esq., Isaac Ashkenazi, Esq., and 

Charles Lizza, Esq., for plaintiffs

Gorge Lombardi, Esq., Jovial Wong, Esq., Mayra Tarantino, Esq., Julia Johnson, Esq.,

and Brendan Barker, Esq. for defendant TEVA

Stuart Sender, Esq., Michael Imbacuan, Esq., and Howard Wang, Esq., for defendant 

DR. REDDY'S LAB

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:

Trial without jury continued before the Honorable Mary L. Cooper from 6/16/15.

Closing arguments held.

Ordered decision taken under advisement.

Lunch recess: 12:20pm – 1:20pm

TIME COMMENCED: 10:00am 

TIME ADJOURNED: 5:00pm 

TOTAL TIME: 6 hours

s/Elizabeth Heffner

Deputy Clerk

Case 3:11-cv-03962-MLC-DEA Document 352 Filed 08/12/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 21118
Consumer Price Index, Bureau of Labor Statistics, February 2012 

Consumer Price Index: Changes in Seasonal Adjustment Status for 2012

These items are changing to Seasonally Adjusted:

Item code Title 

CUUR0000SEFJ02 

CWUR0000SEFJ02 

CUUR0000SEFW02 

CWUR0000SEFW02 

Cheese and related products 

Distilled spirits at home 

CUUR0000SEFB02 

CWUR0000SEFB02 

Fresh biscuits, rolls, muffins 

CUUR0000SS02042 Cookies 

CUUR0000SEFG 

CWUR0000SEFG 

CUUR0000SEEC01 

Fish and seafood 

Postage 

CWUR0000SEEC01 

CUUR0000SEHE02 

CWUR0000SEHE02 

Propane, kerosene, and firewood 

 
Consumer Price Index, Bureau of Labor Statistics, February 2012 

These items are changing to Not Seasonally Adjusted: 

Item code Title 

CUUR0000SEGD01 

CWUR0000SEGD01 

Legal services 

CUUR0000SERE03 

CWUR0000SERE03 

Music instruments and accessories 

CUUR0000SERF01 

CWUR0000SERF01 

Club dues and fees for participant sports and group 

exercises 

CUUR0000SS68023 

CUUR0000SEHC 

CWUR0000SEHC 

CUUR0000SEHC01 

CWUR0000SEHC01 

Tax return preparation and other accounting fees 

Owners’ equivalent rent of residences 

Owners’ equivalent rent of primary residence 

CUUR0000SS10011 Butter
**Exhibit 32.3**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of PRIMEDIA Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Sforzo,Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ ROBERT J. SFORZO                                              |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert J. Sforzo                                                  |
| *Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer  and Controller* |
| November 9, 2006                                             |

 

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to theextent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by theCompany for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
Case 2:11-cv-03510-JMV-JAD Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 4
Case 2:11-cv-03510-JMV-JAD Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/11 Page 2 of 10 PageID: 5
Case 2:11-cv-03510-JMV-JAD Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/11 Page 3 of 10 PageID: 6
Case 2:11-cv-03510-JMV-JAD Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/11 Page 4 of 10 PageID: 7
Case 2:11-cv-03510-JMV-JAD Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/11 Page 5 of 10 PageID: 8
Case 2:11-cv-03510-JMV-JAD Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/11 Page 6 of 10 PageID: 9
Case 2:11-cv-03510-JMV-JAD Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/11 Page 7 of 10 PageID: 10
Case 2:11-cv-03510-JMV-JAD Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/11 Page 8 of 10 PageID: 11
Case 2:11-cv-03510-JMV-JAD Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/11 Page 9 of 10 PageID: 12
Case 2:11-cv-03510-JMV-JAD Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/11 Page 10 of 10 PageID: 13
Eos Petro, Inc.


 


VIA E-MAIL


 


Entrex, Inc.


233 South Wacker Drive


Suite 300


Chicago, IL 60606


Attn: Mr. Stephen H. Watkins, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


E-mail: swatkins@entrex.net


 


March 1, 2013


 


MUTUAL AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE 


TIGRCUB® LICENSE AND SERVICING
AGREEMENT


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


We refer you to the TIGRcub®
License and Servicing Agreement between Eos Petro, Inc. (the “Company”) and you dated March 1, 2012 (the “Agreement”).
This letter serves to evidence that you and the Company have mutually agreed to terminate the Agreement, effective March 1, 2013,
except for those terms of the Agreement that expressly survive termination of the Agreement in accordance with the terms thereof.
Please acknowledge your acceptance of this letter and your agreement with the foregoing by signing where indicated below and returning
a signed copy of this letter to the Company. We wish you the best in your future endeavors.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	“COMPANY”
	 	Eos Petro, Inc.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Nikolas Konstant
	 	Name:	Nikolas Konstant
	 	Title:	Chairman


 


Acknowledged and Accepted on


March 4, 2013


 


	By:	/s/ Stephen H. Watkins	 
	Name:	Stephen H. Watkins	 
	Title:	CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                    1,000

<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                              JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                           2,034
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  21,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     (976)
<INVENTORY>                                                    20,085
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               49,519
<PP&E>                                                         30,473
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   (296)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 82,659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         (61,091)
<BONDS>                                                          (320)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                   (16,590)
<COMMON>                                                       (2,333)
<OTHER-SE>                                                       (293)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  (82,659)
<SALES>                                                        14,103
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               14,103
<CGS>                                                          11,021
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  12,807
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                384
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   822
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      309
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               513
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      513
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.20



</TABLE>
SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Chart 4-1. Selected labor force characteristics of blacks or 

African Americans

0 20 40 60 80 100

Percent

In 2005, blacks or African Americans comprised:

15 percent of those

working part time for

economic reasons

22 percent of the

unemployed

11 percent of the

labor force

29 percent of the

long-term unemployed

25 percent of 

marginally attached

workers

Chart 4-1. Selected labor force characteristics of blacks or 

African Americans

• Blacks are more likely than other groups to experience labor market problems. 

For instance, while blacks made up 11 percent of the U.S. labor force in 2005, 

they accounted for 22 percent of the unemployed and 29 percent of the longterm unemployed (persons unemployed for 27 weeks or longer).

• Also, blacks comprised a disproportionate share of the marginally attached—

persons who were available for work and had searched for work during the 

prior 12 months but who were not currently looking for work.
#### Martin *v.*The Georgia Railroad & Banking Company.

It affirmatively appearing from the evidence that the defendant company was not, relatively to the plaintiff, guilty of any negligence, and also that the latter by the exercise of ordinary care might have avoided the injury he received, the court was right in granting a nonsuit.

February 5, 1895.

Action for damages. Before Judge Clark. DeKalb superior court. August term, 1894..

W. W. Braswell and Hulsey & Bateman, for plaintiff. Joseph B. & Bryan Cumming and Candler & Thomson, for defendant.

Simmons, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff, while walking along the main track of the'defendanfis railroad, heard the noise of a train behind him, and stepped aside until the engine passed. No cars were attached to the engine, and he did not know that any were following .it. When it passed he stepped back on the cross-ties, without looking in the direction from which the engine came, and two cars which had been cut loose from the engine and were following .about a hundred feet or more behind it, ran upon him, inflicting the injury .on account of which this action ivas brought. When the cars struck him they were running at a speed variously estimated at from eight to fifteen miles an hour; one or more employees were on the cars putting on or trying to put on the brakes, which *362were midway of the two ears, and the speed was gradually decreasing. The cars ran about as far as the public crossing, about a hundred yards beyond the point at which the plaintiff was injured.

It is clear from this evidence that the defendant was not, relatively to the plaintiff', guilty*of any negligence. The evidence shows that it was impossible, after the plaintiff stepped back upon the track, to stop the cars in time to avoid striking him; and the failure to comply with the statutory requirements as to giving signals, etc., while approaching the public crossing, was not negligence as to him, inasmuch as these requirements raise no duty as between the railroad company and strangers who may be upon the track elsewhere than at a public crossing. *Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Ry. Co.*v. *Gravitt,*93 *Ga.*369, 20 S. E. Rep. 650. It is also clear that the plaintiff failed to exercise ordinary care for his own safety, and that by the exercise of such care he could have avoided the injury. He knew that this train, which was engaged in hauling rock from a neighboring quarry at which he was employed, passed frequently at that point, and that other trains might pass at any moment. Ordinary care required, when he undertook to walk along the track, that he should look behind to see if a train was approaching; and his failure to do so is not excused by the fact that an engine had already passed him. The court below, therefore, did not err in granting a nonsuit. See *White*v. *Central Railroad Co.,*83 *Ga.*595, and cases cited; *Smith*v. *Central Railroad Co.,*82 *Ga.*801.

*Judgment affirmed.*