alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Michael Vardakis, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report (the Report) on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:11/7/07By:/s/Michael VardakisMichael VardakisPresident and Director     1
Case 2:11-cv-02293-CCC Document 12 Filed 07/12/12 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 86
Case 2:11-cv-02293-CCC Document 12 Filed 07/12/12 Page 2 of 15 PageID: 87
Case 2:11-cv-02293-CCC Document 12 Filed 07/12/12 Page 3 of 15 PageID: 88
Case 2:11-cv-02293-CCC Document 12 Filed 07/12/12 Page 4 of 15 PageID: 89
Case 2:11-cv-02293-CCC Document 12 Filed 07/12/12 Page 5 of 15 PageID: 90
Case 2:11-cv-02293-CCC Document 12 Filed 07/12/12 Page 6 of 15 PageID: 91
Case 2:11-cv-02293-CCC Document 12 Filed 07/12/12 Page 7 of 15 PageID: 92
Case 2:11-cv-02293-CCC Document 12 Filed 07/12/12 Page 8 of 15 PageID: 93
Case 2:11-cv-02293-CCC Document 12 Filed 07/12/12 Page 9 of 15 PageID: 94
Case 2:11-cv-02293-CCC Document 12 Filed 07/12/12 Page 10 of 15 PageID: 95
Case 2:11-cv-02293-CCC Document 12 Filed 07/12/12 Page 11 of 15 PageID: 96
Case 2:11-cv-02293-CCC Document 12 Filed 07/12/12 Page 12 of 15 PageID: 97
Case 2:11-cv-02293-CCC Document 12 Filed 07/12/12 Page 13 of 15 PageID: 98
Case 2:11-cv-02293-CCC Document 12 Filed 07/12/12 Page 14 of 15 PageID: 99
Case 2:11-cv-02293-CCC Document 12 Filed 07/12/12 Page 15 of 15 PageID: 100
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

______________

Nos. 16-3000 & 17-1851

______________

CITY SELECT AUTO SALES INC, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF A CLASS OF 

SIMILARLY SITUATED PERSONS,

Appellant

v.

DAVID RANDALL ASSOCIATES, INC.; RAYMOND MILEY, III

v.

CAROLINE ABRAHAM, d/b/a Business to Business Solutions; 

JOEL ABRAHAM, d/b/a Business to Business Solutions

______________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

(D.C. No. 1-11-cv-02658)

District Judge: Honorable Jerome B. Simandle

______________

Argued January 24, 2018

Before: HARDIMAN, VANASKIE, and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges.

______________

JUDGMENT

______________

This cause came to be considered on the record from the United States District 

Court for the District of New Jersey and was argued on January 24, 2018. On 

consideration whereof, it is now hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this Court that 

the judgment of the District Court entered May 27, 2016, and the order of the District 

Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 264 Filed 04/09/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 9684 Case: 16-3000 Document: 003112877797 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/16/2018
Court entered March 29, 2017, are AFFIRMED. Costs taxed against Appellant. All of 

the above in accordance with the Opinion of this Court. 

ATTEST: 

s/ Patricia S. Dodszuweit 

Clerk 

Dated: March 16, 2018 

Case: 16-3000 Document: 003112877797 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/16/2018

April 9, 2018

Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 264 Filed 04/09/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 9685
EXHIBIT 13**CEO AND CFO CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Infineon Technologies AG (the “Company”)for the annual period ended September 30, 2007, as amended byAmendment No. 1 thereto filed on March 31, 2008 andAmendment No. 2 thereto filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Wolfgang Ziebart, asMember of the Management Board and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, and Marco Schroeter, asMember of the Management Board and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of his knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     This certification will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certificationwill not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specificallyincorporates it by reference.Date: April 17, 2008         /s/  Wolfgang Ziebart  Dr. Wolfgang Ziebart   Member of the Management Boardand
CLOSED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 

:

WILLIAM DYKEMAN, :

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

ALAN I. SMITH, et al., :

:

Defendants. :

 :

Civil No. 11-3608 (SDW)

ORDER

For the reasons expressed in the Opinion filed herewith,

IT IS on this 14 day of July, 2011, th

ORDERED that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted and the

Clerk shall file the Complaint without prepayment of the filing fee; and it is further

ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a

claim upon which relief may be granted; and it is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), the Clerk shall serve a copy of this

Order by regular mail upon the Warden of New Jersey State Prison; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff is assessed a filing fee of $350.00 which shall be deducted from

his prison account pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2) in the manner set forth below, regardless

of the outcome of the litigation; and it is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)(A), Plaintiff is assessed an initial

partial filing fee equal to 20% of the average monthly deposits to the Plaintiff's prison account

for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the Complaint; when funds exist, the

Case 2:11-cv-03608-SDW-MCA Document 3 Filed 07/14/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 31
New Jersey Department of Corrections shall deduct said initial fee from Plaintiff’s prison

account and forward it to the Clerk; and it is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), until the $350.00 filing fee is paid,

each subsequent month that the amount in Plaintiff's prison account exceeds $10.00, the New

Jersey Department of Corrections shall assess, deduct from the Plaintiff's account, and forward to

the Clerk payments equal to 20% of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's prison

account, with each payment referencing the docket number of this action; and it is finally

ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve this Order and the accompanying Opinion on

Plaintiff by regular mail, and shall close the file. 

s/Susan D. Wigenton 

SUSAN D. WIGENTON, U.S.D.J.

2

Case 2:11-cv-03608-SDW-MCA Document 3 Filed 07/14/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 32
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeremy Ray DANNER, a/k/a Caesar, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-7362.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 13, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 18, 2012.

Jeremy Ray Danner, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Vincent Talinao Odulio, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeremy Ray Danner appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction *237of his sentence based on Amendment 750. Our review of the record demonstrates that Amendment 750 did not reduce Dan-ner’s Guidelines range of 240 months. *See United States v. Munn,*595 F.3d 183, 187 (4th Cir.2010). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the report on Form 10-Q of Viad Corp for the fiscal quarter
ended June 30,
2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Viad Corp.
 Date: August 7, 2008
    
    By /s/ Paul B. DykstraPaul B. DykstraChief Executive Officer
Alan E. Sash 

(646) 278-4298 

asash@mclaughlinstern.com 

Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC 1100 New York Avenue, N.W. Suite 500, West Tower Washington, D.C. 20005

t: 202 408 4600 f: 202 408 4699 www.cohenmilstein.com 

May 4, 2012 

The Honorable Michael A. Shipp 

United States Magistrate Judge 

United States District Court 

District of New Jersey 

Martin Luther King Jr. Federal Building 

50 Walnut Street 

Newark, New Jersey 07101 

 Re: Sabol v. Hydroxatone, LLC, No. 2:11-cv-04586-SRC-MAS

Dear Magistrate Judge Shipp: 

Pursuant to the Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order, dated December 2, 2011 

(the “Order”), the parties and their counsel are required to attend a 

status/settlement conference on May 31, 2012. The named plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”) 

in this class action, Susan Sabol and Valerie Done, respectfully request to be 

excused from appearing in person at the May 31st conference. Good cause exists 

for Plaintiffs’ request. Should they be required to attend the hearing, Ms. Sabol 

and Ms. Done would have to travel from Montana and Utah, respectively, and stay 

over-night in a hotel on May 30th. 

Because this is a class action, the expenses associated with Plaintiffs’ travel 

could eventually detract from any award to the class. Further, Plaintiffs need not 

be present in order for counsel to represent their interests, and the interests of the 

proposed class, both with respect to the status of the case and any potential 

Case 2:11-cv-04586-KM-MAH Document 34 Filed 05/04/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 257
The Honorable Michael A. Shipp 

May 4, 2012 

Page 2 

settlement at this relatively early stage of litigation. If deemed necessary, the 

Plaintiffs will be available by telephone throughout the conference. Thus, 

Plaintiffs ask to be excused from attending the status/settlement conference 

scheduled for May 31, 2012. 

Counsel for Plaintiffs has conferred with Defendants and they do not object 

to Plaintiffs’ request. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

___/s/ Alan E. Sash______________ 

Alan E. Sash 

Lee S. Shalov 

McLAUGHLIN & STERN LLP 

260 Madison Ave. 

New York, NY 10016 

Tel: (646) 278-4298 

Fax: (212) 448-0066 

Andrew N. Friedman 

Whitney R. Case 

Stefanie M. Ramirez 

COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL 

PLLC 

1100 New York Avenue NW 

Suite 500 West 

Washington, DC 20005 

Tel: (202) 408-4600 

Fax: (202) 408-4699 

Case 2:11-cv-04586-KM-MAH Document 34 Filed 05/04/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 258
The Honorable Michael A. Shipp 

May 4, 2012 

Page 3 

Angela Edwards 

LAW OFFICE OF ANGELA EDWARDS 

72 Canterbury Circle 

East Longmeadow, MA 01028 

Tel: (413) 525-3820 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on this date, a true copy of the foregoing letter and 

attached proposed form of Order were served via ECF on the following: 

Michael Lynch 

Lauri Mazzuchetti 

Ilona Korzha 

KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 

200 Kimball Drive 

Parsippany, NJ 07054 

Dated May 4, 2012 __/s/ Alan E. Sash______________ 

Alan E. Sash 

Case 2:11-cv-04586-KM-MAH Document 34 Filed 05/04/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 259
Exhibit 31.1

| 1. | I      have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of      ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc.; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                         |   |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/      Jonathan Lewis                      |   |   |   |   |
| Jonathan      Lewis, Chief Executive Officer |   |   |   |   |
| (Principal      Executive Officer)           |   |   |   |   |

----
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 1 of 32 PageID: 422
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 2 of 32 PageID: 423
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 3 of 32 PageID: 424
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 4 of 32 PageID: 425
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 5 of 32 PageID: 426
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 6 of 32 PageID: 427
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 7 of 32 PageID: 428
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 8 of 32 PageID: 429
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 9 of 32 PageID: 430
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 10 of 32 PageID: 431
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 11 of 32 PageID: 432
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 12 of 32 PageID: 433
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 13 of 32 PageID: 434
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 14 of 32 PageID: 435
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 15 of 32 PageID: 436
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 16 of 32 PageID: 437
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 17 of 32 PageID: 438
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 18 of 32 PageID: 439
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 19 of 32 PageID: 440
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 20 of 32 PageID: 441
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 21 of 32 PageID: 442
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 22 of 32 PageID: 443
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 23 of 32 PageID: 444
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 24 of 32 PageID: 445
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 25 of 32 PageID: 446
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 26 of 32 PageID: 447
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 27 of 32 PageID: 448
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 28 of 32 PageID: 449
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 29 of 32 PageID: 450
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 30 of 32 PageID: 451
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 31 of 32 PageID: 452
Case 2:11-cv-01874-ES -PS Document 28-2 Filed 07/22/11 Page 32 of 32 PageID: 453
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10531 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARTI BLACKWELL BYRD, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:97-CR-9-1

- - - - - - - - - - February 11, 1998 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Marti Byrd appeals from her sentence for bank fraud and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344(1) and § 2. The district court did not clearly err in finding that Byrd did not accept responsibility within the meaning of U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. United States v. Flucas , 99 F.3d 177, 180 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied , 117 S. Ct. 1097 (1997). This court lacks jurisdiction to review a defendant's challenge to his sentence based upon mere dissatisfaction with the court’s refusal to grant a downwardNo. 97-10531 -2- departure. United States v. DiMarco , 46 F.3d 476, 477 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Palmer , 122 F.2d 215, 222 (5th Cir. 1997). Byrd’s motion to supplement her brief is DENIED AS UNNECESSARY. AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE**

 

**OFFICEROF GENERAL PARTNER OF HILAND HOLDINGS GP, LP**

 

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q for the three and sixmonths ended June 30, 2009 of Hiland Holdings GP, LP (the “Company”) andfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Joseph L. Griffin, Chief Executive Officer and President of Hiland PartnersGP Holdings, LLC, the general partner of the Company, hereby certify, pursuantto18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 10,  2009 | /s/ Joseph L. Griffin                  |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                        | Joseph L. Griffin                      |
|                        | Chief Executive Officer  and President |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 136 (Friday, July 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16984]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13491-000]


FFP Project 81, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application 
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and 
Competing Applications

July 10, 2009.

    On May 22, 2009, FFP Project 81, LLC filed an application for a 
preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, 
proposing to study the feasibility of the Island 14 Bend Hydrokinetic 
Project, to be located on the Mississippi River, in Pemiscot County, 
Missouri and Lake County, Tennessee.
    The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant 
the permit holder priority to file a license application during the 
permit term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder 
to perform any land disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands 
or waters owned by others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed Island 14 Bend Hydrokinetic Project consists of: (1) 
3,295 proposed 40 kilowatt Free Flow generating units having a total 
installed capacity of 131.80 megawatts; (2) a 4.2-mile-long, 69 
kilovolt transmission line; and (3) appurtenant facilities. The 
proposed Island 14 Bend Hydrokinetic Project would have an average 
annual generation of 577 gigawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Ramya Swaminathan, Vice President of 
Development, Free Flow Power Corporation, 33 Commercial Street, 
Gloucester, MA 01930; phone: (978) 226-1531.
    FERC Contact: Kim Carter, 202-502-6486.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project, including a copy of 
the application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of 
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. 
Enter the docket number (P-13491) in the docket number field to access 
the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-16984 Filed 7-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 38 Filed 06/14/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 106
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 38 Filed 06/14/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 107
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 38 Filed 06/14/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 108