alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 57

To make the repeal of the estate tax permanent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Ms. DUNN (for herself, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. 

NETHERCUTT, Mr. KOLBE, Mr. HERGER, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, 

Mr. CAMP, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. WELLER, 

Mr. PUTNAM, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. MICA, Mr. WICKER, Mr. 

BOEHNER, Mr. PLATTS, Mr. GOODE, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. 

NORWOOD, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. GIBBONS, Mr. BASS, Mr. 

CUNNINGHAM, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. WAMP, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. PICKERING, 

Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin, Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, Mr. KIRK, Mr. JONES

of North Carolina, Mr. WOLF, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. 

ENGLISH, Mr. HALL, Mrs. NORTHUP, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr. 

HAYWORTH, Mr. DREIER, Mr. MCINNIS, Mr. CRANE, Mr. SHAW, Mr. 

ABERCROMBIE, Mr. SOUDER, Mrs. WILSON of New Mexico, Mr. ROGERS

of Kentucky, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. REHBERG, and Mr. CALVERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To make the repeal of the estate tax permanent.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Death Tax Perma5 nency Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 57 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ESTATE TAX REPEAL MADE PERMANENT. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 901 of the Economic 

3 Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 is 

4 amended—

5 (1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘shall not 

6 apply—’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘(other 

7 than title V) shall not apply to taxable, plan, or limi8 tation years beginning after December 31, 2010.’’, 

9 and 

10 (2) in subsection (b) by striking ‘‘, estates, 

11 gifts, and transfers’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in section 

14 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconcili15 ation Act of 2001.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000884504
<NAME> THERMOENERGY CORP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         183,165
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               183,165
<PP&E>                                          19,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                (19,102)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 564,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,915,935
<BONDS>                                        656,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,486,797
<OTHER-SE>                                ( 3,010,990)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   564,432
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  529,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              97,691
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (608,417)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (608,417)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1208

MUSA NABIEU BANGURA,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A73-699-795)

Argued: October 26, 2004 Decided: December 8, 2004

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ARGUED: Randall Lee Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, Arlington,

Virginia, for Petitioner. Margaret Kuehne Taylor, Office of

Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Washington, D.C., for Respondent. ON BRIEF: Robert D. McCallum,

Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Mary Jane Candaux,

Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Musa Bangura, a native and citizen of the Republic of Sierra

Leone, seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s

denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal.

We first reject Bangura’s claim that he established

eligibility for asylum and withholding of removal. In its

decision, the Board found that Bangura had not established a wellfounded fear of persecution based upon his political beliefs and

opinions if he returned to Sierra Leone. To obtain reversal of

this decision, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented

was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find

the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502

U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record

and conclude that Bangura has not shown that the evidence compels

a different result. Bangura thus cannot also meet the higher

standard for withholding of removal. See INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca,

480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987).

We also reject Bangura’s claim that the Board’s summary

affirmance procedure violates his right to due process because the

Board did not give detailed consideration of his claim. See 8

C.F.R. § 1003.1(a)(7)(2004). We have previously held that the

summary affirmance procedure comports with due process and after

reviewing the record, we find nothing in Bangura’s case that
3

suggests his claim was not handled with the required consideration.

See Blanco de Belbruno v. Ashcroft, 362 F.3d 272, 281-83 (4th Cir.

2004). 

Because we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s

denials and Bangura’s right to due process was not violated by the

summary affirmance procedure, the petition for review is

 DENIED.
###### **EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

 

AlphaPro Tech, LtdCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd on from 10-Q for the period ending March31,2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Sheldon Hoffman Chief Executive Officer of the company,certify, pursuant to 10 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934: and

 

(2)                                   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| DATE:  | April 21, 2003 | BY:    | /s/  Lloyd Hoffman      |
|--------|----------------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |           |   | LLOYD HOFFMAN           |
|   |           |   | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |

 

 

----
Exhibit 3-1  STATE OF DELAWARE SECRETARY OF STATE DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS FILED 01:29 PM 03/11/2003 030161856 - 3634706    CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION  OF  MOTOR
TREND AUTO SHOWS INC.   The undersigned, for the
purposes of forming a corporation under the laws of the State of Delaware, do make, file and record this Certificate, and do certify that:  FIRST:         
The name of this corporation is Motor Trend Auto Shows Inc.  SECOND:     Its Registered Office in the State of
Delaware is to be located at 9 East Loockerman Street, Suite 1B, In the City of
Dover, County of Kent, 19901.  The
Registered Agent in charge thereof is National Registered Agents, Inc.  THIRD:         The purpose of the corporation is to
engage in any lawful act or activity
for which a corporation may be organized under the General Corporation Law of
Delaware.  FOURTH:      The amount of the total authorized
capital stock of the corporation is 1,000, all of which are of a par value of
$0.01 dollars each and classified as Common stock.  FIFTH:           
The name and mailing address of the incorporator are as follows:  NAME
  
  MAILING ADDRESSBeverly C. Chell
  
  745 Fifth Avenue, 23rd FloorNew York, NY  10151
   SIXTH:          
The duration of the corporation shall be perpetual.  SEVENTH:     The
personal liability of all of the directors of the corporation is hereby
eliminated to the fullest extent allowed as provided by the Delaware General
Corporation Law, as the same may be supplemented and amended.  
     EIGHTH:     The corporation shall, to the fullest
extent legally permissible under the provisions of the Delaware General
Corporation Law, asthe same may
be amended and supplemented, indemnify and hold harmless any and all persons
whom it shall have power to indemnify under said provisions from and against
any and all liabilities (including expenses) imposed upon or reasonably
incurred by him in connection with any action, suit or other proceeding in
which he may be involved or with which he may be threatened, or other matters
referred to in or covered by said provisions both as to action in his official
capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such office, and
shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director or officer of the
corporation. Such indemnification provided shall not be deemed exclusive of any
other rights to which those indemnified may be entitled under any Bylaw,
Agreement or Resolution adopted by the shareholders entitled to vote thereon
after notice.    Dated
on this 28th day of February, 2003.    Beverly C. ChellBeverly C. Chell, Incorporator  2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-6730

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

JAMES PRESTON FRYE, a/k/a Jamie Frye, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief 

District Judge. (3:01-cr-00167-JRS-1) 

Submitted: March 25, 2009 Decided: April 3, 2009 

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

James Preston Frye, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Ronald Hood, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 James Preston Frye appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Frye, No. 3:01-cr00167-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5363 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5363

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 18, 2004

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize salary adjustments for Justices and judges of the United 
                      States for fiscal year 2005.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR FEDERAL JUSTICES AND 
              JUDGES.

    Pursuant to section 140 of Public Law 97-92, Justices and judges of 
the United States are authorized during fiscal year 2005 to receive a 
salary adjustment in accordance with section 461 of title 28, United 
States Code.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### OVERSEAS EXCHANGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. INWOOD MOTORS, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, Esco Packers *&*Supply Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Dec. 31, 1956.

Mandel, Beck & Krakowski, New York City, for plaintiff. Newton W. Mandel, New York City, of counsel.

*229Goodman & Werner, .New York City, for defendant and third party plaintiff, Emanuel Goodman, New York City, of counsel.

William H. Ross, New York City, for third party defendant.

FREDERICK VAN PELT BRYAN, District Judge.

Defendant corporation makes two motions, pursuant to Rule 30(b), Fed. Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A., to vacate respective notices by plaintiff and third party defendant to take its depositions by an officer having knowledge of the facts.

Defendant predicates its motions upon the grounds that none of its officers have any knowledge of the facts and that they all reside and do business in Missouri.

The defendant is a New York corporation with a place of business here. The moving affidavit is made by an Assistant Secretary of the corporation who is also its attorney, and who states that he is familiar with many of the facts and circumstances.

The mere fact that the officers of the defendant state by affidavit that they have no knowledge of the facts is no reason why they should not be examined as to any knowledge they may have or what the books and records of the corporation disclose concerning the transactions in suit. The examining parties are entitled to explore these subjects and test the truth of the statements of complete lack of knowledge so as to be in the position to bar the officers from testifying at the trial if the facts so indicate.

Moreover, the Assistant Secretary is here and available, and admits he has knowledge of at least some of the facts. Since he occupies this corporate office he cannot escape examination merely because he is also one of defendant’s attorneys. The examining parties will examine him first and may then determine which, if any, of the other officers they need to examine to ascertain further facts.

The motions are denied,
ALASKA HAWAII

Percentage change

3.0% and over

2.0% to 2.9%

1.0% to 1.9%

0.0% to 0.9%

-0.1% or below

D.C.

West

North Central Mountain

East

North Central

Middle

Atlantic

New England

South

Atlantic

East

South Central

West

South Central

Pacific

WASH.

ORE.

NEV.

CALIF.

IDAHO

MONT.

WYO.

UTAH

COLO.

N.D.

S.D.

NEB.

KAN.

ARIZ.

N.M.

TEXAS

OKLA.

ARK.

LA.

MISS.

TENN.

MO.

ILL.

MINN.

IOWA

WIS.

MICH.

IND. OHIO

KY.

N.Y.

PA.

W.VA. VA.

N.C.

S.C.

GA.

FLA.

ALA.

VT.

N.H.

MAINE

#

MASS.

#

CONN.

#

N.J.

#

DEL. #

MD.

#

R.I.

Chart 1-10. Total nonfarm employment continued to rise 

across most of the Nation in 2006

NOTE: Percent change in nonfarm payroll employment from 2005 to 2006, annual averages.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

• Employment increased in 48 states and the District of Columbia, with 38 states 

posting increases of 1.0 percent or more over the year. Employment was down 

in two states, Louisiana and Michigan.

• The largest over-the-year increases in employment occurred in states of the 

Mountain division: Arizona (5.4 percent), Wyoming (4.9 percent), Nevada and 

Utah (4.8 percent each), and Idaho (4.6 percent).

• Reflecting the continuing impact of Hurricane Katrina, Louisiana recorded the 

largest percentage decrease in employment (-1.9 percent) from 2005 to 2006.

Chart 1-10. Total nonfarm employment continued to rise 

across most of the Nation in 2006
-28

-15

-7

17

-2

-9

4

10

32

24

-40 -20 0 20 40

Percent change in real earnings, 1979-2006

Women

Men

Chart 5-9. The change in real earnings since 1979 has been 

more favorable for women than for men at all levels of 

education

NOTE: Change in median usual weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers 25 years and older, adjusted using the CPI-URS research series as of April 2007. In 2006, data were based on highest diploma or degree received; in 1979, data were based on 

years of school completed.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Total, 25 years and over

Bachelor's degree and higher

Less than a high school diploma

High school graduates, no college

Some college or associate degree

Chart 5-9. The change in real earnings since 1979 has been 

more favorable for women than for men at all levels of 

education

• Overall, real earnings for women 25 years and over increased by nearly 25 

percent from 1979 to 2006, while men’s real earnings were little changed.

• Women with at least a high school diploma experienced increases in real 

earnings. For men, only college graduates saw an increase; all other education 

groups experienced a decline in real earnings.

• While women fared better overall than men during this time period, in a sense 

they were playing “catch up” to men. The growth in women’s earnings reflects 

the impacts of a rise in the proportion of working women with a college 

education, an increase in women in higher-paying managerial and professional 

jobs, and a shift toward more year-round, full-time work among women.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Special Emphasis Panel (SEP): Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research Centers, Special Interest Project Competitive Supplements (SIPS) (U48 Panels N, O and P), RFA-DP09-101SUPP09, Initial Review 

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting.

Time and Dates: 

9 a.m.-5 p.m., August 5, 2009 (closed).

9 a.m.-5 p.m., August 6, 2009 (closed).

9 a.m.-5 p.m., August 7, 2009 (closed).

*Place:*                     Westin Hotel, 3377 Peachtree Road, NE., Atlanta, GA, 30326, Telephone (678) 500-3100.                

*Status:*                     The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                

*Matters To Be Discussed:*                     The meeting will include the review, discussion, and evaluation of the application received in response to “Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research Centers, Special Interest Project Competitive Supplements (SIPS) (U48 Panels N, O and P), RFA-DP09-101SUPP09, initial review.”                

*Contact Person for More Information:*                     Brenda Colley-Gilbert, PhD, Director, Extramural Research Program Office, CCH, 47770 Buford Highway, MS K-92, Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone (770) 488-8390.                

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Dated: July 16, 2009.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-17359 Filed 7-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16732]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

 [USITC SE-09-020]

Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date:  July 15, 2009 at 11 a.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status:  Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-457 and 731-TA-1153 (Final) (Certain Tow-Behind 
Lawn Groomers and Parts Thereof from China)--briefing and vote. (The 
Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determinations and 
Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before July 
27, 2009.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting. Earlier announcement of this meeting 
was not possible.

    By order of the Commission:

     Issued: July 9, 2009.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
 [FR Doc. E9-16732 Filed 7-10-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```