alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11


                K-III COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
         For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 1995 and 1996
                (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                         Three Months Ended September 30,    Nine  Months Ended September 30,
                         --------------------------------    --------------------------------
                                 1995           1996             1995            1996
                                 ----           ----             ----            ----
<S>                        <C>             <C>                <C>             <C>  

Loss applicable to common
    shareholders           $    (22,386)   $    (23,973)      $   (136,511)   $    (78,599)
                            ===========     ===========        ===========     =========== 


Weighted average common
    shares outstanding      110,909,810     128,874,002        110,120,522     128,721,459
                            ===========     ===========        ===========     ===========

Loss per common share      $       (.20)   $       (.19)      $      (1.24)   $       (.61)
                            ===========     ===========        ===========     =========== 

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In connection with the filing by ADE Corporation (the Company) of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2003
(the Report), the undersigned, as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Chris L. KoliopoulosChris L. Koliopoulos, Ph.D.President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Skagit State Bancorp, Inc.  on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), we, Cheryl Bishop, President and Chief Executive Officer, andCarla F. Tucker, Executive Vice-President/Chief Financial Officer, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
| /s/  Cheryl R. Bishop                  |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Cheryl  R. Bishop                      |   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                   |   |
|                                   |   |
| /s/  Carla F. Tucker                   |   |
| Carla  F. Tucker                       |   |
| Executive  Vice-President              |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer               |   |
|                                   |   |
|                                   |   |
| August 10,  2010                  |   |
| Date                                   |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the filing by ADE Corporation (the Company) of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended January 31, 2006 (the Report), the undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 13, 2006 |  | /s/ Brian C. James     
|                     |  | Brian C. James         
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5195 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5195

  To permanently reenact chapter 12 of title 11 of the United States 
                   Code, relating to family farmers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 30, 2004

  Mr. Smith of Michigan (for himself, Ms. Baldwin, and Mr. Bishop of 
   Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To permanently reenact chapter 12 of title 11 of the United States 
                   Code, relating to family farmers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT REENACTMENT OF CHAPTER 12.

    (a) Reenactment.--Chapter 12 of title 11, United States Code, as 
reenacted by section 149 of division C of the Omnibus Consolidated and 
Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999 (Public Law 105-277), 
is reenacted.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 302 of the Bankruptcy, Judges, 
United States Trustees, and Family Farmer Bankruptcy Act of 1986 (28 
U.S.C. 581 note) is amended by striking subsection (f).

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendment made by this Act shall take effect on 
January 1, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 84-4 Filed 10/25/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 2974
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 84-4 Filed 10/25/11 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 2975
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 84-4 Filed 10/25/11 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 2976
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 84-4 Filed 10/25/11 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 2977
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 84-4 Filed 10/25/11 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 2978
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
 Date: August 14, 2009
    By:
    /s/ David R. AllenDavid R. AllenChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
# cpsaat30
Exhibit 10.16


 


BASE SALARIES FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


OF


C&F FINANCIAL CORPORATION


 


The following are the base salaries (on an annual basis) effective as of January 1, 2013 of the named executive officers of C&F Financial Corporation:


 


	
Larry G. Dillon

	 	
$

	
285,000

	 
	
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

	 	 	 	 
	
 

	 	 	 	 
	
Thomas F. Cherry

	 	
$

	
240,000

	 
	
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

	 	 	 	 
	
 

	 	 	 	 
	
Bryan E. McKernon

	 	
$

	
220,000

	 
	
President and Chief Executive Officer of C&F Mortgage Corporation
EXHIBIT 23.1
**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement onForm S8 (No. 333-48534) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Plan and 2000 EmployeeStock Purchase Plan and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-56610)pertaining to the 1997 Stock Plan, the 2000 Employee Stock Plan, the 2001Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan and  the vEngines, Inc. 2000 Stock IncentivePlan of our report dated March 12, 2002, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements and the schedule of Centillium Communications, Inc.included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.
                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
San Jose, CaliforniaMarch 26, 2002
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5106 

To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to expand the Agricultural 

Management Assistance Program to include the State of Hawaii. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 

Mr. CASE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to expand the 

Agricultural Management Assistance Program to include 

the State of Hawaii. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF THE AGRICULTURAL MANAGE4 MENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. 

5 Section 524(b)(1) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act 

6 (7 U.S.C. 1524(b)(1)) is amended by inserting ‘‘Hawaii,’’ 

7 after ‘‘Delaware,’’. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATIONS

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the foregoing Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Bank of the Carolinas
Corporation (the Registrant) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                   |  |                                                                    
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 17, 2010 |  | /s/ Robert E. Marziano                                             
|                   |  | Robert E. Marziano                                                 
|                   |  | President, Chief Executive Officer
& Acting Chief Financial Officer



29
1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United St ates District Judge for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-4096

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Nebraska. * Salome Gee Perez, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 9, 2006 Filed: October 23, 2006

___________ Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Salome Gee Perez appeals the 100-month prison sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to conspiri ng to distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. His couns el has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), suggesting that the sentence is unreasonable.-2- We disagree. In sentencing Perez within the undisputed Guidelines range, the district court properly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, specifically noting Perez’s mental health needs; and nothing in the record rebuts the presumption that the sentence is reasonable. See United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220, 260-64 (2005) (appellate courts must revi ew sentences for unreasonablen ess; sentencing courts must take into account Guidelines and other § 3553(a) factors ); United States v. Tobacco , 428 F.3d 1148, 1151 (8th Cir. 2005) (presu mptively reasonable sentence can be unreasonable if district court failed to c onsider relevant factor that should have received significant weight, gave significant we ight to improper or irrelevant factor, or considered only appropriate factors but committed clear error of judgment in weighing them); United States v. Lincoln , 413 F.3d 716, 717-18 (8th Cir.) (sentence within applicable Guidelines range is presumptively reasonable, and defendant bears burden to rebut that presumption), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 840 (2005). Having reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

______________________________
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the report on Form 10-Q of Viad Corp for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Viad Corp.
 Date: May 8, 2009
    By /s/ Paul B. DykstraPaul B. DykstraChief Executive Officer
#### Bruce Kelley et al., Respondents, v Gregory Chavez et al., Appellants.

[821 NYS2d 466]

In an action to recover possession of real property, defendants Gregory Chavez appeals, and the defendant Kristina Heuser, sued herein as Kristina Huser, separately appeals, from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grays, J.), dated July 27, 2005, which denied the motion of the defendant Gregory Chavez to vacate a stipulation of settlement entered into by the parties on February 15, 2005, and to reinstate a preliminary injunction and motion to dismiss that were withdrawn under the terms of that stipulation, and (2) an order of the same court, also dated July 27, 2005, which denied the motion of the defen*591dant Gregory Chavez to vacate a judgment of the same court dated April 7, 2005, and (3) the defendant Kristina Heuser, sued herein as Kristina Huser, also appeals from an order of the same court, also dated July 27, 2005, which denied her motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against her for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Ordered that the appeals by the defendant Kristina Heuser, sued herein as Kristina Huser, from the two orders dated July 27, 2005, denying the motions of the defendant Gregory Chavez are dismissed, as she is not aggrieved by those orders *(see*CPLR 5511); and it is further,

Ordered that the orders are affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents.

The motion of the appellant Gregory Chavez to vacate a written stipulation of settlement was properly denied. Stipulations of settlement are favored by the courts and are not to be lightly set aside *(Daniel v Daniel,*224 AD2d 573 [1996]), especially where, as here, the party seeking to vacate the stipulation was represented by counsel *(see Hallock v State of New York,*64 NY2d 224, 230 [1984]; *Town of Clarkstown v M.R.O. Pump & Tank,*287 AD2d 497, 498 [2001]; *Kazimierski v Weiss,*252 AD2d 481 [1998]). Relief from a stipulation will be granted only upon a showing of good cause sufficient to invalidate a contract, such as fraud, overreaching, duress, or mistake *(see Hallock v State of New York, supra*at 230; *Town of Clarkstown v M.R.O. Pump & Tank, supra; Kazimierski v Weiss, supra).*Here, Chavez’s submissions did not amount to a showing of good cause sufficient to invalidate the stipulation.

The motion of the appellant Kristina Heuser, sued herein as Kristina Huser, to dismiss the action insofar as asserted against her for lack of personal jurisdiction was properly denied. We agree with the Supreme Court that Heuser’s objections to personal jurisdiction amounted to a bare denial of service of process, which was insufficient to warrant a hearing *(see Chemical Bank v Darnley,*300 AD2d 613 [2002]; *Greenpoint Sav. Bank v Aponte,*238 AD2d 376 [1997]; *Granite Mgt. & Disposition v Sun,*221 AD2d 186 [1995]).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J.E, Adams, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.
Case 3:10-cr-00285-PGS Document 15 Filed 09/27/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 23
Case 3:10-cr-00285-PGS Document 15 Filed 09/27/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 24
Petitioner.

v. ORDER

OSCAR AVILES, et aL,

Respondents.

For the reasons expres intheM9morandum Opinion accompanying this Order,

IT IS

onthis /2dayof ,2011,

ORDERED that the Petittora of Habeas Comus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is

DISMISSED as moot; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order upon the parties, and shall

close the file.

ISLE’ R flSLFRtTh i
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2



       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as
follows:

     1.   I, Janet Ching Man Fung, am the Group Director - Finance of SUNDAY
          Communications Limited (the "Company").

     2.   To the best of my knowledge:

          (A)  The Company's Form 20-F accompanying this Certification, in the
          form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"); and

          (B)  The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company.

Dated: June 30, 2004


                                                 By: /s/ JANET CHING MAN FUNG
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Name:  Janet Ching Man Fung
                                                 Title: Group Director - Finance


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO SUNDAY COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED AND WILL
BE RETAINED BY SUNDAY COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATION IS BEING FURNISHED SOLELY PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERIM GUIDANCE FOR SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION
ISSUED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON MARCH 21, 2003 IN RELEASE
NO. 33-8212, THIS CERTIFICATION WILL NOT BE DEEMED "FILED" FOR PURPOSES OF
SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, OR OTHERWISE SUBJECT TO THE
LIABILITY OF THAT SECTION.
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

35. Persons not in the labor force by desire and availability for work, age, and sex

[In thousands]

Category

Total Age Sex

2016 2017

16 to 24

years

25 to 54

years

55 years

and over Men Women

2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017

Total not in the labor force. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94,351 94,759 17,232 16,989 23,513 23,014 53,606 54,756 37,743 38,130 56,608 56,629

Do not want a job now1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88,502 89,242 15,452 15,335 21,032 20,732 52,018 53,175 35,009 35,591 53,492 53,650

Want a job1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,849 5,518 1,780 1,655 2,481 2,282 1,587 1,581 2,733 2,539 3,116 2,979

Did not search for work in previous

year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,415 3,320 994 953 1,353 1,281 1,069 1,086 1,522 1,450 1,894 1,870

Searched for work in previous year,

but not in past 4 weeks2. . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,434 2,198 787 702 1,128 1,001 519 495 1,211 1,089 1,222 1,109

Not available to work now. . . . . . . . . . . . 630 610 257 263 287 258 86 90 251 254 379 357

Marginally attached (available to

work now)3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,804 1,587 530 439 841 743 433 405 960 835 843 752

Discouraged over job

prospects4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 553 476 130 115 267 223 156 138 345 299 208 177

Reasons other than

discouragement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,250 1,112 400 324 573 519 277 268 615 536 635 575

Family responsibilities. . . . . . . . . . . 199 188 26 23 127 121 46 44 61 53 138 135

In school or training. . . . . . . . . . . . . 224 187 171 141 47 41 7 6 120 103 105 84

Ill health or disability. . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 139 16 13 67 54 62 71 77 68 67 71

Other5

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 682 598 187 147 333 304 162 147 356 312 326 286

1

Includes some persons who are not asked if they want a job.

2 Persons who had a job in the prior 12 months must have searched since the end of that job.

3 Persons ′′marginally attached to the labor force′′ are those who want a job, have searched for work during the prior 12 months, and were available to take a job during

the reference week, but had not looked for work in the past 4 weeks.

4 Discouraged workers are persons marginally attached to the labor force who did not actively look for work in the prior 4 weeks for reasons such as thinks no work

available, could not find work, lacks schooling or training, employer thinks too young or old, and other types of discrimination.

5

Includes those who did not actively look for work in the prior 4 weeks for such reasons as child-care and transportation problems, as well as a small number for which

reason for nonparticipation was not ascertained.

NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

1
##### 



EXHIBIT 13

CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002

Pursuant
to section 906 if the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Crayfish Co., Ltd., a Japanese company (the Company), hereby
certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended September 30, 2003 (the
Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 10, 2004
    
    /s/ Kazuhiko MurakiKazuhiko MurakiPresident and Representative DirectorDated: March 10, 2004
    
    /s/ Kazuhiro TamuraKazuhiro TamuraDirector and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2009
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.
 By:
    /s/  Bryan McGuireName:
    Bryan McGuireTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    May 14, 2010