alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
442061v1

EXHIBIT G

Case 2:11-cv-02873-WJM-MF Document 1-7 Filed 05/19/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 98

1~'~1~' !!!!--. ~.

',1'~ ,~~"

• iinl¥z1lF~'~~

:,:,:~~"l~!;;~!~~

Case 2:11-cv-02873-WJM-MF Document 1-7 Filed 05/19/11 Page 3 of 7 PageID: 100
.", ..it..

.. 1_- • • e...lfliL_

•

•

~'"

-~:,.~'

Case 2:11-cv-02873-WJM-MF Document 1-7 Filed 05/19/11 Page 4 of 7 PageID: 101
Case 2:11-cv-02873-WJM-MF Document 1-7 Filed 05/19/11 Page 5 of 7 PageID: 102
Case 2:11-cv-02873-WJM-MF Document 1-7 Filed 05/19/11 Page 6 of 7 PageID: 103
U8a02

usaoo

':';':";)~~J;t~!£';;;01';'iill,'" 

U804S?!

US586

U81l25

USS2l

>zilroblnBr2MI6flaps me'l:lWW

08819

:>3Mf1CHA!'€MEASURE
#### Alberto Livichusca, Respondent, v M & T Mortgage Co., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[854 NYS2d 226]

*823In March 2001 the plaintiff acquired the premises known as 3152 Fulton Street in Brooklyn. Between January 23, 2003 and March 9, 2005, the appellant owned the adjoining parcel of real property known as 3154 Fulton Street.

On April 18, 2006 the plaintiff commenced this action against, among others, the appellant, alleging a negligence cause of action for damage to property. The plaintiffs complaint alleged that “commencing in 2001 and continuing thereafter,” the owners of the building located at 3154 Fulton Street, including the appellant, failed to clean the gutters which caused an accumulation of ice and water on the roof to ultimately run off into the plaintiffs basement, causing property damage.

The appellant moved to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) and (7) on the grounds that the complaint was time-barred and failed to state a cause of action. The appellant contended that the property damage claim against it accrued in 2001 when the water damage commenced. The plaintiff cross-moved pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) for leave to amend the complaint. The proposed amended complaint included allegations that the appellant failed to maintain the gutters at 3154 Fulton Street in December 2004, that the appellant violated Administrative Code of the City of New York § 27-2027, and that melting snow and ice from the appellant’s building ran off into the plaintiffs basement causing damage. The Supreme Court denied the appellant’s motion and granted the plaintiffs cross motion. We affirm.

The appellant did not own the building at 3154 Fulton Street in 2001. Any duty of the appellant to maintain the building must be predicated upon the appellant’s ownership, occupancy, control, or special use of the property *(see Cabales v Little League of Islips,*292 AD2d 329 [2002]). Therefore, no cause of action for negligence could have accrued in favor of the plaintiff against the appellant in 2001 because the appellant did not owe *824the plaintiff any duty of care at that time *(see Espinal v Melville Snow Contrs.,*98 NY2d 136, 138 [2002]). The plaintiffs action, to the extent it seeks to recover for property damage which occurred in 2004 during the appellant’s ownership of the building, was timely commenced *(see*CPLR 214 [4]).

The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff leave to amend the complaint *(see Comsewogue Union Free School Dist. v Allied-Trent Roofing Sys., Inc.,*15 AD3d 523 [2005]). The proposed amended complaint sufficiently stated a cause of action sounding in common-law negligence, causing property damage. Additionally, a violation of Administrative Code § 27-2027 may be considered by the trier of fact as some evidence of negligence by the appellant and in support of the plaintiffs common-law negligence cause of action to recover for damage to property *(see White v Jeffco W. Props.,*304 AD2d 824 [2003]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Lifson, J.P., Ritter, Florio and Carni, JJ., concur.
Case 3:06-cv-04841-PGS-ES Document 66 Filed 10/28/08 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 4017
Case 3:06-cv-04841-PGS-ES Document 66 Filed 10/28/08 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 4018
PROB 12C 

(7/93) 

United States District Court 

for 

District of New Jersey 

Amended Petition for Warrant or Summons for Offender Under Supervision 

Name of Offender: Antonio Gee Docket Number: ll-00453-001 

PACTS Number: 41398 

Name of Sentencing Judicial Officer: THE HONORABLE MARYL. COOPER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Date of Original Sentence: 03/31/2006 

Original Offense: Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon 

Original Sentence: 78 Months imprisonment, 36 months supervised release 

Special Conditions: $100 special assessment 

Type of Supervision: Supervised Release Date Supervision Commenced: June 8, 2016 

Assistant U.S. Attorney: Brendan Day, 402 East State Street, Room 430, Trenton, New Jersey 08608, 

(609) 989-2190 

Defense Attorney: Brian Reilly, Federal Defenders Office, 22 South Clinton Ave., Station Plaza #4, 4th 

Floor, Trenton, New Jersey 08609, (609) 989-2160 

PETITIONING THE COURT 

Rl To issue a warrant 

C To issue a summons 

The probation officer believes that the offender has violated the following condition(s) of supervision: 

Violation Number Nature ofNoncompliance 

The offender has violated the standard supervision condition which states 'You 

shall not commit another federal, state, or local crime.' 

On December 28, 2016, the offender was arrested by Trenton Police Officers and 

charged with Possession of a CDS with Intent to Distribute Cocaine. The 

probation office is awaiting details of this offense. 

The offender was released by police and he immediately notified the probation 

office of his arrest. No court date has been set at this time. 

Case 3:11-cr-00453-MLC Document 32 Filed 01/27/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 79
2 

Prob 12C-page 2 

Antonio Gee 

The offender has violated the standard supervision condition which states 'You 

shall notify the probation officer within 72 hours of any change of residence 

or employment.' 

On January 4, 2017, the probation office was notified by law enforcement 

officials that the offender is no longer living at 6 Bradford Street, Hamilton, New 

Jersey. The offender is living at 169 Passaic Street in Trenton, New Jersey. 

The offender f€liled to notify the probation office within 72 hours of any change of 

residence. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

By: Edwin Vazquez~~· '~ ,, 

Supervising U.S. Pr 1cer 

Date: 0112612017 

THE COURT ORDERS: 

~e Issuance of a Warrant 

["' The Issuance of a Summons. Date of Hearing: ___ _ 

u No Action 

D Other 

Case 3:11-cr-00453-MLC Document 32 Filed 01/27/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 80
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, John Harkola, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of RDC International, Inc.

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
exchange act rules 13a-14 and 15d- 14) for the registrant and have:

     A) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
     B) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the  "evaluation  date");  and C)  presented  in this annual  report our
conclusions  about the  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures
based on our evaluation as of the evaluation date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     A) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     B) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: December 29,
2003

/s/ John Harkola
-----------------------------------------
John Harkola
Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent)
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Click Commerce, Inc.Chicago, Illinois

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Form S-3 (No. 333-118951) and Form S-8(Nos. 333-70084, 333-54432 and 333-107845) of ClickCommerce, Inc. of our reports dated March 30, 2006, relating to theconsolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, and theeffectiveness of Click Commerce, Inc.’s internal control over financialreporting, which appear in this Form 10-K.
|                     |   | /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP |
|---------------------|--------|----------------------|
| Chicago, Illinois   |   |                 |
| March 30, 2006 |   |                 |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Ben Franklin Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Steven Sjogren, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2008              
|                                     
|/s/ C. Steven Sjogren                
|C. Steven Sjogren                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
NOTE: Data are for persons 25 years and older.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Chart 2-3. Regardless of race or Hispanic ethnicity, 

unemployment rates generally decline with higher levels of 

education

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Bachelor's degree and

higher

Some college or

associate degree

High school graduates,

no college

Less than a high school

diploma

White

Black or African American

Asian

Hispanic or Latino

Unemployment rate

2006

Chart 2-3. Regardless of race or Hispanic ethnicity, 

unemployment rates generally decline with higher levels of 

education

• In 2006, among persons 25 years and older, the unemployment rate of blacks 

with a college degree (2.8 percent) was 10 percentage points lower than the 

rate for blacks with less than a high school diploma (12.8 percent). 

• The unemployment rate for white college graduates (2.0 percent) was about 4 

points below that of whites with less than a high school diploma (5.9 percent). 

• The unemployment rate for Hispanic college graduates (2.2 percent) was about 

3 points below that of Hispanics with less than a high school diploma (5.5 

percent).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 :

SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL :

ASSOCIATION LOCAL 27 ANNUITY, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-4234 (MLC)

HEALTH & WELFARE, EDUCATION & :

UNEMPLOYMENT FUNDS, et al., : O P I N I O N

 :

Plaintiffs, :

 :

v. :

 :

AMERICAN AIR SYSTEMS GROUP, INC., :

 :

Defendant. :

 :

THE CLERK OF THE COURT entered default against the defendant

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 55(a). (See

unnumbered dkt. entry following dkt. entry no. 11.) The

plaintiffs now move under Rule 55(b) for entry of judgment by

default against the defendant. (Dkt. entry no. 12.) The motion

is unopposed, even though the return date was more than one week

ago. (Id.) The motion will be granted. For good cause

appearing, the Court will issue an appropriate order and

judgment.

 s/ Mary L. Cooper 

MARY L. COOPER

United States District Judge

Dated: April 11, 2012

Case 3:11-cv-04234-MLC-DEA Document 13 Filed 04/11/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 135
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

34. Unemployed jobseekers by sex, reason for unemployment, and active jobsearch methods used

Sex and reason

2004

Thousands of

persons Methods used as a percent of total jobseekers

Average

number

of

methods

used

Total

unemployed

Total

jobseekers

Employer

directly

Sent out

resumes

or filled

out

applications

Placed

or

answered

ads

Friends

or

relatives

Public

employment

agency

Private

employment

agency

Other

 Total, 16 years and over ......................................................... 8,149 7,151 62.7 54.5 16.4 18.0 19.9 7.7 11.8 1.92

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs 1 ........ 4,197 3,199 65.4 53.9 19.8 21.1 25.7 10.3 13.5 2.10

Job leavers ............................................................................... 858 858 64.4 54.0 17.3 16.8 18.7 7.0 11.6 1.90

Reentrants ................................................................................ 2,408 2,408 59.4 55.1 13.5 15.1 15.2 5.5 11.0 1.75

New entrants ............................................................................ 686 686 59.6 56.2 10.3 15.8 11.2 4.0 6.4 1.64

 Men, 16 years and over .......................................................... 4,456 3,807 63.9 52.4 15.9 19.5 20.0 8.2 12.7 1.93

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs 1 ........ 2,603 1,954 66.3 51.5 18.6 22.1 24.7 10.4 14.1 2.08

Job leavers ............................................................................... 437 437 66.1 51.6 17.8 17.8 19.1 8.4 12.1 1.94

Reentrants ................................................................................ 1,070 1,070 59.8 53.1 12.2 15.8 14.7 5.2 12.1 1.73

New entrants ............................................................................ 346 346 59.7 56.0 9.8 17.8 11.4 4.8 7.1 1.67

 Women, 16 years and over .................................................... 3,694 3,344 61.4 57.0 17.1 16.4 19.8 7.1 10.7 1.90

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs 1 ........ 1,595 1,245 64.0 57.5 21.6 19.5 27.2 10.2 12.6 2.13

Job leavers ............................................................................... 421 421 62.5 56.5 16.8 15.8 18.3 5.6 11.1 1.87

Reentrants ................................................................................ 1,338 1,338 59.0 56.8 14.5 14.4 15.7 5.7 10.2 1.77

New entrants ............................................................................ 340 340 59.4 56.4 10.8 13.6 11.0 3.2 5.7 1.60

1 Data on the number of jobseekers and the jobsearch methods used exclude

persons on temporary layoff.

 NOTE: The jobseekers total is less than the total unemployed because it does

not include persons on temporary layoff. The percent using each method will

always total more than 100 because many jobseekers use more than one method.

Beginning in January 2004, data reflect revised population controls used in the

household survey.

245
# cpsaat28
ex10-32.htm


Exhibit 10.32


 


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SUMMARY


(EFFECTIVE AS OF JUNE 6, 2012)


 


Employee directors receive no additional compensation other than their normal salary for serving on the Board or its committees. The Chairman of the Board receives $130,000 annually.  Each non-employee director (other than the Chairman of the Board) receives $55,000 annually.  In addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee receives a $30,000 annual retainer. The Chairmen of the Compensation and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees each receive an additional $20,000 annual retainer. Each Audit Committee member (other than the Chairman of the Committee) receives an additional $15,000 annual retainer. Each member of the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees (other than the Chairmen of those Committees) receives an additional $10,000 annual retainer. Outside directors (including the Chairman of the Board) also receive an initial grant, upon first election or appointment, and an annual grant of shares of restricted stock equal to $130,000, which valuation is based on the price of Newpark stock on the date of the grant (appointment, election or re-election).
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Faraj Aalaei, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report of Centillium Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: March 13, 2008 | Faraj Aalaei Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------

---
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 37 Filed 01/15/13 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 774
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 37 Filed 01/15/13 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 775
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 37 Filed 01/15/13 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 776
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 37 Filed 01/15/13 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 777
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section
                     906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert C. Howell, Chief Financial Officer of Organetix, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the quarter ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 15, 2005

/s/ Robert C. Howell
--------------------
Robert C. Howell
Chief Financial Officer
- ,}\ 

, ~.· 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

MARY ANN SIVOLELLA, et al. 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY AND AXA EQUITABLE 

FUNDS MANAGEMENT GROUP, 

LLC 

Defendants. 

GLENN D. SANFORD, et al. 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

AXA EQUITABLE FUNDS MANAGEMENT 

GROUP, LLC 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) Civil No. 3: 11-cv-04194 PGS-DEA 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

RECEIVED 

AUG 1 9 2014 

AT 8:30 M 

WILLIAM T. WALSH CLERK 

) Civil No. 3:13-cv-00312 PGS-DEA 

) 

) 

) 

) ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE 

) FOR SERVICE OF PLAINTIFFS' 

) EXPERT REBUTTAL REPORTS 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court by Plaintiffs, through their 

counsel, and for good cause showing; 

IT IS on this /g~day of August 2014, 

Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 91 Filed 08/19/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1794
ORDERED that the June 10, 2014 Consent Order Extending Expert Deadlines 

previously entered by this Court (Dkt. 89) is amended with respect to the deadline for service of 

Plaintiffs' rebuttal expert reports responsive to Defendants' expert reports, which is hereby 

extended to September 19, 2014. 

SO ORDERED. 

Date: August (!(, 2014 

Hon.D~· 

-2-

Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 91 Filed 08/19/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1795
H. R. 519

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

An Act

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of the San Gabriel

River Watershed, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘San Gabriel River Watershed

Study Act’’.

SEC. 2. STUDY OF SAN GABRIEL RIVER WATERSHED.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior (hereafter in

this Act referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall conduct a special

resource study of the following areas:

(1) The San Gabriel River and its tributaries north of

and including the city of Santa Fe Springs.

(2) The San Gabriel Mountains within the territory of

the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains

Conservancy (as defined in section 32603(c)(1)(C) of the State

of California Public Resource Code).

(b) STUDY CONDUCT AND COMPLETION.—Section 8(c) of Public

Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)) shall apply to the conduct and

completion of the study conducted under this section.

(c) CONSULTATION WITH FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.—In conducting the study under this section, the Secretary

shall consult with the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers

and Mountains Conservancy and other appropriate Federal, State,

and local governmental entities.

(d) CONSIDERATIONS.—In conducting the study under this section, the Secretary shall consider regional flood control and drainage

needs and publicly owned infrastructure such as wastewater treatment facilities.

SEC. 3. REPORT.

Not later than 3 years after funds are made available for

this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Energy

and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on
H. R. 519—2

Resources of the House of Representatives a report on the findings,

conclusions, and recommendations of the study.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.