alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Rachel Erika PIZAN, a.k.a. Rachel Erika Alcalde, a.k.a. Rachel Erika Bigler, a.k.a. Rachel de Alcalde, a.k.a. Rachel Piza, a.k.a. Rachel Pizan, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 11-72380.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*711Submitted Dec. 19, 2012.*

Filed Dec. 28, 2012.

Jeremy Frost, Law Offices of Jeremy R. Frost & Associates, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Oil, Ann Carroll Varnon, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rachel Erika Pizan, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Pizan’s motion to reopen because she failed to show she was prejudiced by her counsel’s performance. *See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft,*389 F.3d 814, 826 (9th Cir.2003) (presumption of prejudice rebutted where petitioner cannot establish plausible grounds for relief).

In light of our disposition, we need not address Pizan’s remaining contentions.

We do not consider the supplemental material filed by Pizan because it is not part of the administrative record. *Dent v. Holder,*627 F.3d 365, 371 (9th Cir.2010).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case 1:11-cv-04018-JEI-KMW Document 21 Filed 12/12/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 344
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

:

DONNY REEVEY, :

:

Petitioner, : Civil Action No. 11-4063 (MLC)

:

v. : O P I N I O N

:

PAULA K. LAGANA, et al., :

:

Respondents. :

 :

1. On March 16, 2012, this Court ordered Petitioner to show

cause in writing why his habeas petition should not be

dismissed as time-barred. (Dkt. entry no. 6, 3-16-12 Order;

see dkt. entry no. 5, 3-16-12 Op.)

2. Petitioner has not responded, and as such this Court has not

been provided with any facts to indicate that the Petition

was filed within the one-year limitations period under 28

U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2) or that the Petition can overcome the

statutory time-bar due to equitable tolling.

3. The petition appears to be time-barred. Accordingly, the

petition will be dismissed. The Court will enter an

appropriate order and judgment.

 s/ Mary L. Cooper 

MARY L. COOPER

United States District Judge

Dated: July 11, 2012

Case 3:11-cv-04063-MLC Document 7 Filed 07/11/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 64
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code),each of the undersigned officers of Globalstar, Inc. (the “Company”), doeshereby certify that:

 

Thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 ofthe Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information containedin the Form 10-Q****fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Dated: May 11, 2009  |   |                    |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                      |   |                    |
|                      |   |                    |
|                      | By:    |                    | /s/ JAMES MONROE III |
|                      |   | James Monroe III        |
|                      |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|                      |   |                    |
| Dated: May 11,  2009 |   |                    |
|                      |   |                    |
|                      | By:    |                    | /s/ FUAD AHMAD |
|                      |   | Fuad Ahmad              |
|                      |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MedPro Safety Products, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, W. Craig Turner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1)      | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and    |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |
| (2)      | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|                    |

|                 | MEPRO SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. |
|----------------------|-----------------------------|
|                 |
|                 |
| Dated: June 24, 2009 | By:                         | /s/W. Craig Turner |
|                 |                        |  |
|                 |                        | W. Craig Turner |
|                 |                        | Chief Executive Officer |

25

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

OFFICERS CERTIFICATIONS

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Douglas
Emmett, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ JORDAN L. KAPLAN
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Jordan L. Kaplan                     
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Douglas Emmett, Inc.                 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 32.2

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Spear & Jackson, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Patrick J.
Dyson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

   1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Patrick J. Dyson
--------------------
Patrick J. Dyson
Chief Financial Officer

December 23, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of Mattmar Minerals, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Kirk M. Warshaw, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934, as amended; and                  
| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2) | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 6, 2010

|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Kirk M. Warshaw    
|                       
|Kirk M. Warshaw        
|Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this
certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5334 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5334

        To suspend temporarily the duty on Dichloroethyl Ether.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2004

 Mr. Gary G. Miller of California introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on Dichloroethyl Ether.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DICHLOROETHYL ETHER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.39.41      Dichloroethyl       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Ether (1,1'-                                                       31/2014
                         oxybis [2-
                         chloroethane] CL-
                         CH2-CH2-0-CH2-CH2-
                         CL) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2909.19.18)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 21.1


                                ADE CORPORATION

                      List of Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries


ADE Phase Shift, Inc.                  ADE Technologies, Inc.
3470 E. Universal Way                  77 Rowe Street
Tucson, AZ 85706                       Newton, MA 02466

ADE Optical Systems Corporation        ADE International Corporation
9625 Southern Pine Boulevard           32 Loockerman Square
Charlotte, NC 28273                    Suite L-100
                                       Dover, DE

ADE International GmbH                 ATI Foreign Sales Corporation
Klausnerring 17                        c/o Corporate Services
85551 Kirchheim                        Price Waterhouse Centre
85551 Heimstetten                      Collymore Rock, St. Michael
Germany                                Barbados

ADE Securities Corporation             ADE Software Corporation
80 Wilson Way                          80 Wilson Way
Westwood, MA 02090                     Westwood, MA 02090


                    List of Partially-Owned Subsidiaries


Japan ADE Ltd.
Tokimec Building
16-1, 2-chome, Minamikamata
Ohta-ku, Tokyo 144
Japan
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Syndication, Inc. (the
        "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
        Brian Sorrentino, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
        certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  *Dated:*April 15, 2008
              *By:*
              */s/
                  Brian Sorrentino**Brian
                  Sorrentino**Acting Chief
                  Executive Officer*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v.

Sixing Liu,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Criminal No. 11-208 (SRC)

OPINION & ORDER

CHESLER, District Judge

This matter comes before the Court on a motion filed by Defendant Sixing Liu 

(“Defendant”) to discharge his legal counsel and represent himself. For the reasons that follow, 

the Court denies the motion.

When a litigant appeals a District Court disposition, that Court relinquishes jurisdiction

over most aspects of the case. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 

(1982) (“The filing of a notice of appeal . . . confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and 

divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal.”); 

United States v. Lafko, 520 F.2d 622, 627 (3d Cir. 1975) (“Filing of a notice of appeal 

immediately transfers jurisdiction of a case from the District Court to the Court of Appeals.”); 

United States v. Batka, 916 F.2d 118, 120 (3d Cir. 1990). 

A jury convicted Defendant on September 26, 2012. [Docket Item # 121]. Thereafter, 

Defendant appealed his conviction to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. 

[Docket Item # 131]. That appeal remains pending. See United States of America v. Sixing Liu, 

Docket Nos. 13-1940 & 13-2282 (3d Cir.). This Court therefore does not have jurisdiction to 

1

Case 2:11-cr-00208-SRC Document 164 Filed 09/10/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 3046
grant Defendant’s request. Additionally, it appears that on June 10, the Court of Appeals granted 

Defendant permission to proceed pro se. 

If Defendant’s case returns to this Court, and if Defendant again seeks to discharge his 

counsel, this Court will consider a renewed motion at that time. Accordingly,

IT IS on this 10th day of September, 2014,

ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to discharge his counsel is hereby DENIED. 

 s/ Stanley R. Chesler 

STANLEY R. CHESLER

United States District Judge

2

Case 2:11-cr-00208-SRC Document 164 Filed 09/10/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 3047
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) by ClickSoftware Technologies Ltd. (the "Company"), the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Shmuel Arvatz

Shmuel Arvatz

Chief Financial Officer

April 8, 2010
Case 3:11-mj-05017-TJB     Document 79     Filed 05/11/11     Page 1 of 1 PageID: 161
Order entered February 14, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01485-CV

DANIEL K. HAGOOD, P.C. AND FITZPATRICK HAGOOD SMITH AND UHL, LLP,

Appellants

V.

KUNAL KAPAI, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-04027-D

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s February 13, 2019 first unopposed motion for extension of 

time to file brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than March 4, 

2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
BETHEL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Exhibit 11.  Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings

                             Three Months Ended           Three Months Ended
                             September 30,1995            September 30, 1994
                           ----------------------       ---------------------

EQUIVALENT SHARES:

Average Shares Outstanding           560,125                     547,400

Total Equivalent Shares              560,125                     547,400
Total Primary Shares                 608,261                     617,816
Total Fully Diluted Shares           725,785                     734,698
                                                                             
Net Income                       $   421,637                 $   405,712
Less Preferred Stock Dividend         35,000                      35,000
                              -------------------       ---------------------
Net Income after Preferred                                                    
  Dividend                       $   386,637                 $   370,712
                              ===================       =====================
                                                                             
Primary Earnings Per Share       $       0.64                $       0.60
Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share $       0.58                $       0.55
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 2 3

- 2013 LT Case No. 2022

- D P

- 024

_____________________________ R.F. , Father of G.F. , a Child , Appellant,

v. D EPARTMENT OF C HILDREN AND F AMILIES , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal fro m the Circuit Court for Hernando County. Stephen E. Toner, Jr. , Judge

. Ana Gomez-Mallada, Fort Lauderdale , for Appellant. Rachel Batten, o f C hildren’s Legal Serv ices, Brooksville, for Appellee. Blake Lynne Bruce, of Defending Best Interests Project, Alexandria, Virginia, and Sara Elizabeth G oldfarb, Statewide Director o f Appeals , and Amanda Victoria G lass, Senior Attor ney, of Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem o/b/o G.F. November 14, 2023
P ER C URIAM
. A FFIRMED
.2

H ARRIS , S OUD , and P RATT , JJ., concur .

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
**Exhibit 32.3**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of PRIMEDIA Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Sforzo,Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ ROBERT  J. SFORZO                                             |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert J. Sforzo                                                  |
| *Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer  and Controller* |

 

May 10, 2007

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to theextent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by theCompany for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
Exhibit 31.1.  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Chief Executive Officer Certification
Pursuant To Section 302 Of 
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

|I, James D. Delamater, certify that:
|------------------------------------
|                                    
|1.                                  
|                                    
|2.                                  
|                                    
|3.                                  
|                                    
|4.                                  
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|5.                                  
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    



|February 08, 2005 | /s/ James D. Delamater 
|----------------- | -----------------------
|                  | James D. Delamater     
|                  | Chief Executive Officer