Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 136 / Friday, July 17, 2009 / Notices 34785 

investigations available to authorized 

applicants under the APO issued in the 

investigations, provided that the 

application is made no later than 21 

days prior to the hearing date specified 

in this notice. Authorized applicants 

must represent interested parties, as 

defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are 

parties to the investigations. A party 

granted access to BPI in the preliminary 

phase of the investigations need not 

reapply for such access. A separate 

service list will be maintained by the 

Secretary for those parties authorized to 

receive BPI under the APO. 

Staff report.—The prehearing staff 

report in the final phase of these 

investigations will be placed in the 

nonpublic record on September 2, 2009, 

and a public version will be issued 

thereafter, pursuant to section 207.22 of 

the Commission’s rules. 

Hearing.—The Commission will hold 

a hearing in connection with the final 

phase of these investigations beginning 

at 9:30 a.m. on September 17, 2009, at 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission Building. Requests to 

appear at the hearing should be filed in 

writing with the Secretary to the 

Commission on or before September 9, 

2009. A nonparty who has testimony 

that may aid the Commission’s 

deliberations may request permission to 

present a short statement at the hearing. 

All parties and nonparties desiring to 

appear at the hearing and make oral 

presentations should attend a 

prehearing conference to be held at 9:30 

a.m. on September 11, 2009, at the U.S. 

International Trade Commission 

Building. Oral testimony and written 

materials to be submitted at the public 

hearing are governed by sections 

201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), and 207.24 of the 

Commission’s rules. Parties must submit 

any request to present a portion of their 

hearing testimony in camera no later 

than 7 business days prior to the date of 

the hearing. 

Written submissions.—Each party 

who is an interested party shall submit 

a prehearing brief to the Commission. 

Prehearing briefs must conform with the 

provisions of section 207.23 of the 

Commission’s rules; the deadline for 

filing is September 10, 2009. Parties 

may also file written testimony in 

connection with their presentation at 

the hearing, as provided in section 

207.24 of the Commission’s rules, and 

posthearing briefs, which must conform 

with the provisions of section 207.25 of 

the Commission’s rules. The deadline 

for filing posthearing briefs is 

September 24, 2009; witness testimony 

must be filed no later than three days 

before the hearing. In addition, any 

person who has not entered an 

appearance as a party to the 

investigation may submit a written 

statement of information pertinent to 

the subject of the investigation, 

including statements of support or 

opposition to the petition, on or before 

September 24, 2009. On October 9, 

2009, the Commission will make 

available to parties all information on 

which they have not had an opportunity 

to comment. Parties may submit final 

comments on this information on or 

before October 14, 2009, but such final 

comments must not contain new factual 

information and must otherwise comply 

with section 207.30 of the Commission’s 

rules. All written submissions must 

conform with the provisions of section 

201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any 

submissions that contain BPI must also 

conform with the requirements of 

sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the 

Commission’s rules. The Commission’s 

rules do not authorize filing of 

submissions with the Secretary by 

facsimile or electronic means, except to 

the extent permitted by section 201.8 of 

the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 

FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even 

where electronic filing of a document is 

permitted, certain documents must also 

be filed in paper form, as specified in II 

(C) of the Commission’s Handbook on 

Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR 

68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002). 

Additional written submissions to the 

Commission, including requests 

pursuant to section 201.12 of the 

Commission’s rules, shall not be 

accepted unless good cause is shown for 

accepting such submissions, or unless 

the submission is pursuant to a specific 

request by a Commissioner or 

Commission staff. 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, 

each document filed by a party to the 

investigations must be served on all 

other parties to the investigations (as 

identified by either the public or BPI 

service list), and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

Authority: These investigations are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.21 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

Issued: July 13, 2009. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–16995 Filed 7–16–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–628] 

In the Matter of Certain Computer 

Products, Computer Components and 

Products Containing Same; Notice of 

Commission Decision Not To Review 

the ALJ’s Final Initial Determination 

Finding No Violation of Section 337; 

Termination of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review the presiding administrative law 

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) final initial 

determination (‘‘ID’’) issued on March 

16, 2009, finding no violation of section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 

1337 in this investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Panyin Hughes, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3042. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on January 14, 2008, based on a 

complaint filed by International 

Business Machines Corporation of 

Armonk, New York (‘‘IBM’’). 73 FR 2275 

(Jan. 14, 2008). The complaint alleged 

violations of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, or the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain computer products, computer 

components and products containing 

same by reason of infringement of 

certain claims of United States Patent 

Nos. 5,008,829 (‘‘the ’829 patent’’); 

5,249,741 (‘‘the ’741 patent’’); and 

5,371,852 (‘‘the ’852 patent’’). The 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

34786 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 136 / Friday, July 17, 2009 / Notices 

complaint named as respondent 

ASUSTek Computer, Inc. of Taipei, 

Taiwan and ASUS Computer 

International of Fremont, California. On 

January 21, 2008, IBM amended the 

complaint and notice of investigation to 

add Respondents Pegatron Technology 

Corporation of Taipei, Taiwan and 

Unihan Technology Corporation, of 

Taipei, Taiwan, wholly owned 

subsidiaries of ASUSTek. The 

respondents are referred to collectively 

as ‘‘ASUS.’’ 

On August 4, 2008, the ALJ issued an 

ID that extended the target date for 

completion of the investigation to July 

14, 2009. The Commission determined 

not to review the ID. 

On March 16, 2009, the ALJ issued his 

final ID finding no violation of section 

337 by ASUS. The ID included the ALJ’s 

recommended determination on remedy 

and bonding. In the subject ID, the ALJ 

found that ASUS’s products do not 

infringe asserted claims 1 and 2 of the 

’829 patent. The ALJ also found that 

none of the cited references anticipated 

claims 1 and 2 of the ’829 patent or 

rendered them obvious. Likewise, the 

ALJ found that ASUS’s products do not 

infringe asserted claim 1 of the ’741 

patent. The ALJ further found that none 

of the cited references anticipated claim 

1 or rendered claim 1 of the ’741 patent 

obvious. The ALJ also found that the 

’741 patent satisfied the written 

description and enablement 

requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112, first 

paragraph, for claim 1. Similarly, the 

ALJ found that ASUS’s accused 

products do not infringe asserted claims 

1, 8, 13, 14, 22 and 23 of the ’852 patent. 

The ALJ also found that none of the 

cited references anticipates the asserted 

claims of the ’852 patent. The ALJ 

further found that IBM met the domestic 

industry requirement because a 

sufficient nexus existed between IBM’s 

licensing activities and each of the 

asserted patents. 

On March 30, 2009, IBM filed a 

petition, seeking review of the ALJ’s ID 

with regard to infringement of all the 

patents-in-issue. That same day, ASUS 

filed a contingent petition, seeking 

review of the ALJ’s findings that the 

’829 and ’741 patents are not invalid. 

On April 7, 2009, ASUS filed an 

opposition to IBM’s petition for review, 

and IBM filed a response to ASUS’s 

contingent petition for review. Also on 

April 7, 2009, the Commission 

investigative attorney filed a response to 

both IBM’s petition and ASUS’s 

contingent petition. 

Having examined the record of this 

investigation, including the ALJ’s final 

ID, the petitions for review, and the 

responses thereto, the Commission has 

determined not to review the subject ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42(h) of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42(h)). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: July 13, 2009. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–16997 Filed 7–16–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1122–NEW] 

Office on Violence Against Women; 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: New Collection 

ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review: Semi-Annual 

Progress Report for the Grants to 

Enhance Culturally and Linguistically 

Specific Services for Victims of 

Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, 

Sexual Assault, and Stalking. 

The Department of Justice, Office on 

Violence Against Women (OVW) will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

Comments are encouraged and will be 

accepted for ‘‘sixty days’’ until 

September 15, 2009. This process is 

conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 

1320.10. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to The Office of 

Management and Budget, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention Department of Justice Desk 

Officer, Washington, DC 20503. 

Additionally, comments may be 

submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 

395–5806. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

New collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: SemiAnnual Progress Report for Grantees 

from Grants to Enhance Culturally and 

Linguistically Specific Services for 

Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating 

Violence, Sexual Assault, and Stalking 

Program (Culturally and Linguistically 

Specific Services Program). 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection: Form Number: 1122- XXXX. 

U.S. Department of Justice, Office on 

Violence Against Women. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: The affected public includes 

the approximately 50 grantees of the 

Culturally and Linguistically Specific 

Services Program. The program funds 

projects that promote the maintenance 

and replication of existing successful 

domestic violence, dating violence, 

sexual assault, and stalking communitybased programs providing culturally 

and linguistically specific services and 

other resources. The program also 

supports the development of innovative 

culturally and linguistically specific 

strategies and projects to enhance access 

to services and resources for victims of 

violence against women. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond/reply: It is estimated that it will 

take the approximately 50 respondents 

(Culturally and Linguistically Specific 

Services Program grantees) 

approximately one hour to complete a 

semi-annual progress report. The semiannual progress report is divided into 

sections that pertain to the different 

types of activities in which grantees 

may engage. A Culturally and 

Linguistically Specific Services Program 

grantee will only be required to 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES