alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 

:

JOEY W. JACKSON, :

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

STATE OF NEW JERSEY :

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, :

:

Defendant. :

 :

 Civil No. 11-2592(GEB)

OPINION AND ORDER

BROWN, Chief Judge

Plaintiff Joey W. Jackson (“Jackson”) filed a complaint on May 2, 2011, that opened the

above captioned case in this Court. (Doc. No. 1.) It appears that:

1. The Clerk of the Court will not file the complaint unless the person seeking relief pays

the entire applicable filing fee in advance or the person applies for and is granted in forma pauperis

status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. See Local Civil R. 5.1(f).

2. The filing fee for commencing a civil action in this court is $350.00. See 28 U.S.C. §

1914(a). 

3. Jackson did not prepay $350.00; rather, he submitted an application to proceed in this

matter in forma pauperis (IFP application), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (IFP Application; Doc.

No. 1-2.)

Case 3:11-cv-02592-PGS-TJB Document 38 Filed 06/14/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 187
4. Having considered Jackson’s IFP application, the Court concludes that Jackson has 

adequatelyestablished that hisfinancial condition renders payment ofthe $350.00 filing fee a hardship.

Therefore, for the foregoing reasons;

IT IS THIS 14th day of June, 2011, hereby

ORDERED that Jackson’s IFP application is GRANTED;

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court FILE Jackson’s complaint.

 /s/ Garrett E. Brown, Jr. 

GARRETT E. BROWN, JR., U.S.D.J.

Page 2 of 2

Case 3:11-cv-02592-PGS-TJB Document 38 Filed 06/14/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 188
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6240

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROMERO DAVIS, a/k/a BeBe, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CR-98-360, CA-99-3879-19-0) Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: August 29, 2001 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Romero Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Romero Davis appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversibleerror. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Davis , Nos. CR-98-360; CA-99-3879-19-0 (D.S.C. filed Oct. 23, 2000, entered Oct. 24, 2000; filed Jan. 23, 2001, entered Jan. 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
ME1 14510781v.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

OREXO AB, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. 

and MYLAN INC., 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 11-3788 (FLW)(LHG)

REQUEST BY JOHN E. FLAHERTY FOR 

PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY 

TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC NOTIFICATION 

Request is hereby made by John E. Flaherty for pro hac vice counsel Suni Sreepada to 

receive electronic notification in the within matter, and it is represented that: 

1. An order of the Court granting a motion to appear pro hac vice in the within 

matter has been entered; and 

2. The Admission Fee, in the amount of $150.00, pursuant to L. Civ. R. 101.1(c)(3), 

has been paid to the Clerk of the Court for Suni Sreepada. 

Dated: December 7, 2012 s/ John E. Flaherty 

John E. Flaherty 

McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP 

Four Gateway Center 

100 Mulberry Street 

Newark, NJ 07102 

(973) 622-4444 (telephone) 

(973) 624-7070 (facsimile) 

Of Counsel: 

Errol B. Taylor 

Frederick M. Zullow 

Anna Brook 

Suni Sreepada 

MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & 

McCLOY LLP 

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW-LHG Document 109 Filed 12/07/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 2264
2 

ME1 14510781v.1

One Chase Manhattan Plaza 

New York, New York 10005-1413 

(212) 530-5000 (telephone) 

(212) 530-5219 (facsimile) 

PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY INFORMATION 

Suni Sreepada (SSreepada@milbank.com) 

MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & McCLOY LLP 

One Chase Manhattan Plaza 

New York, New York 10005-1413 

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW-LHG Document 109 Filed 12/07/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2265
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,925-01

EX PARTE JERRY WAYNE DUKES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1136610-A IN THE 184TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of

cocaine and sentenced to eight months’ incarceration. 

On February 10, 2015, the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law that were

based on laboratory results purportedly showing that Applicant possessed no controlled substances. 

The trial court recommended that relief be granted. However, the habeas record contains only an

unsigned letter describing the results of the laboratory testing. 

The trial court shall supplement the record with the laboratory report showing the analysis
2

of the evidence from Applicant’s case. If no such report is available, the trial court shall make

findings of fact addressing the absence of this evidence and assessing the credibility of the letter

included in the habeas record as Exhibit 4. The trial court shall also make any other supplemental

findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of

Applicant’s claims for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has supplemented the record and

resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental

transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes

from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and

conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any

extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: April 22, 2015

Do not publish
May 12, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

BERNARDO TORRES, JR., Appellant

NO. 14-14-00006-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the record of the court below. Having considered 

the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court 

orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT' COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

UNITED STATES v. BRIHEEM NERO : CRINHNAL NO.: tt .. cR ... 405 

PETITI()N FOR 

WRIT OF HABEAS CORI>US 

(X) Ad Prosequendum ( ) Ad Testificandum 

1. BRIHEEM NERO, SBI# 218095C; FBI# 966964CB4, 

"Detainee'') is now confined at the: 

• (hereinafter the 

PASSAIC COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 

2. The Detainee is charged in this District by: ( X ) Indictment ( ) Inforn1ation ( ) Complaint 

with a violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 922(g). 

3. The Detainee wi11 be returned to the custody of the detaining facility upon termination of 

proceedings. 

4. The Detainee will be required at the U.S. POST OFFICE & COURTHOUSE~ FEDERAL 

SQUARE, COURTROOM #5, NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, before the Hon. Katharine S. 

Hayden, U.S.D.J., on MONDAY, NOVEMBER 5, %012 at 9:00a.m., for SENTENCING in 

the above-captioned case. A Writ of Habeas Corpus 'should issue for that purpose. 

DATED: October 17, 2012 

Fabiana Pierre-Louis 

Assistant U.S. Attorney 

Petitioner 

Case 2:11-cr-00405-KSH Document 21 Filed 10/23/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 53
ORDER 

Let the Wn. "t lsfu~~ J 

DATED: JO(ZVfiV 

WRIT OF HABEAS 

The United States of America to Warden of the PASSAIC CO 

FACILITY: 

WE COMMAND YOU that you have the body of 

BRIHEEM NERO 

now confined at the PASSAIC COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACULTY, brought before the 

United States District Court, the Hon. Katharine S. Hayden, U .. District Judge, U.S. POST 

OFFICE & COURTHOUSE, FEDERAL SQUARE, Courtroom #5, NEW ARK, NEW JERSEY 

on MONDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2012 at 9:00 a.m., for SENT NCING in the above-captioned 

matter. 

Immediately upon completion of the proceedings, the Detainee ·n be returned to said place of 

confinement in safe and secure conduct. 

DATED: 

WITNESS the Honorable Katharine S. Hayden 

United States District Judge 

Newark, New Jersey. 

foWrv I ' . 

Case 2:11-cr-00405-KSH Document 21 Filed 10/23/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 54
EXHIBIT 32

   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of eGene, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Udo
Henseler, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Jeffrey
Williams, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.    The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


Dated: March 30, 2004         By:    /s/ Udo Henseler
                              Udo Henseler
                              Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
                              Officer

Dated: March 30, 2004         By:    /s/ Jeffrey Williams
                              Jeffrey Williams
                              Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 1 of 24 PageID: 2651
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 2 of 24 PageID: 2652
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 3 of 24 PageID: 2653
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 4 of 24 PageID: 2654
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 5 of 24 PageID: 2655
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 6 of 24 PageID: 2656
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 7 of 24 PageID: 2657
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 8 of 24 PageID: 2658
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 9 of 24 PageID: 2659
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 10 of 24 PageID: 2660
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 11 of 24 PageID: 2661
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 12 of 24 PageID: 2662
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 13 of 24 PageID: 2663
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 14 of 24 PageID: 2664
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 15 of 24 PageID: 2665
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 16 of 24 PageID: 2666
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 17 of 24 PageID: 2667
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 18 of 24 PageID: 2668
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 19 of 24 PageID: 2669
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 20 of 24 PageID: 2670
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 21 of 24 PageID: 2671
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 22 of 24 PageID: 2672
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 23 of 24 PageID: 2673
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59-1 Filed 09/26/11 Page 24 of 24 PageID: 2674
H. R. 5370

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4985 Moorhead

Avenue in Boulder, Colorado, as the ‘‘Donald G. Brotzman Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

4985 Moorhead Avenue in Boulder, Colorado, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Donald G. Brotzman Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Donald

G. Brotzman Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

34. Unemployed jobseekers by sex, reason for unemployment, and active jobsearch methods used

[Numbers in thousands]

Sex and reason

2015

Unemployed Percent of jobseekers using method

Average

number of

methods

used

Total Jobseekers

Contacted

employer

directly

Sent out

resumes

or filled

out

applications

Placed

or

answered

ads

Contacted

friends

or

relatives

Public

employment

agency

Private

employment

agency

Other

Total unemployed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,296 7,322 50.5 57.4 15.1 26.8 17.2 8.3 14.1 1.9

Job losers and persons who completed

temporary jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,063 3,089 53.8 57.1 17.8 32.1 21.8 10.3 14.3 2.1

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 819 52.6 60.2 16.0 23.2 14.1 7.7 13.6 1.9

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,535 2,535 46.9 55.8 12.8 22.4 14.4 6.9 14.6 1.7

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879 879 47.6 60.8 11.9 24.1 11.6 5.6 11.8 1.7

Men. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,490 3,898 51.0 54.9 14.9 28.3 17.5 8.6 14.1 1.9

Job losers and persons who completed

temporary jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,441 1,849 54.6 54.8 17.2 32.3 21.4 10.2 14.2 2.1

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 397 397 51.0 57.1 16.0 25.4 14.9 8.3 14.5 1.9

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,178 1,178 46.5 52.8 12.0 24.3 14.3 7.6 14.8 1.7

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 474 474 48.3 58.7 11.9 25.2 12.1 5.1 11.9 1.7

Women. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,807 3,424 49.9 60.2 15.5 25.0 16.8 7.9 14.0 1.9

Job losers and persons who completed

temporary jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,622 1,239 52.5 60.4 18.7 31.6 22.3 10.4 14.5 2.1

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 423 423 54.1 63.1 16.0 21.2 13.4 7.2 12.8 1.9

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,357 1,357 47.3 58.3 13.5 20.8 14.5 6.3 14.5 1.8

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 405 46.8 63.1 11.8 22.8 11.1 6.1 11.7 1.7

1 Data on the number of jobseekers and the jobsearch methods used exclude persons on temporary layoff.

NOTE: The jobseekers total is less than the total unemployed because it does not include persons on temporary layoff. The percent using each method will always total

more than 100 because many jobseekers use more than one method. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

1
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

19. Persons at work in agriculture and nonagricultural industries by hours of work

[Numbers in thousands]

Hours of work

2018

Persons at work Percent distribution

All

industries

Agriculture

and related

industries

Nonagricultural

industries

All

industries

Agriculture

and related

industries

Nonagricultural

industries

Total, persons at work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150,394 2,328 148,066 100.0 100.0 100.0

1 to 34 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,025 589 33,436 22.6 25.3 22.6

1 to 4 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,485 44 1,441 1.0 1.9 1.0

5 to 14 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,212 140 5,072 3.5 6.0 3.4

15 to 29 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,039 274 16,765 11.3 11.8 11.3

30 to 34 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,290 132 10,158 6.8 5.7 6.9

35 hours and over. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116,369 1,739 114,630 77.4 74.7 77.4

35 to 39 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,359 99 9,260 6.2 4.2 6.3

40 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69,340 703 68,637 46.1 30.2 46.4

41 hours and over. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37,670 937 36,733 25.0 40.3 24.8

41 to 48 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,060 192 12,867 8.7 8.3 8.7

49 to 59 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,734 292 14,442 9.8 12.5 9.8

60 hours and over. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,877 453 9,424 6.6 19.5 6.4

Average hours, total at work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38.9 42.1 38.9 – – –

Average hours, persons who usually work full time. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42.5 47.6 42.5 – – –

NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data. Dash indicates no data or data that do not meet publication criteria (values

not shown where base is less than 35,000).

1
FACSIMILE 

(212) 808-7897 

www.kelleydrye.com 

KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP

A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 

101 PARK AVENUE 

NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10178 

 

(212) 808-7800 

WASHINGTON, DC 

LOS ANGELES, CA 

CHICAGO, IL 

STAMFORD, CT 

PARSIPPANY, NJ 

 

BRUSSELS, BELGIUM 

 

AFFILIATE OFFICES 

MUMBAI, INDIA 

BETH D. JACOB 

DIRECT LINE: (212) 808-7624 

EMAIL: bjacob@kelleydrye.com 

August 10, 2012 

VIA E-MAIL

Honorable Lois H. Goodman, U.S.M.J. 

United States District Court 

Clarkson S. Fisher Federal Building 

 & U.S. Courthouse 

402 East State Street 

Trenton, New Jersey 08608 

Re: Orexo AB v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.

Civil Action No. 11-3788 (MAS) (LHG) 

Dear Judge Goodman, 

On behalf of the Mylan defendants, we respectfully request that the Court 

consider this brief response to the letter submitted by plaintiff Orexo this morning shortly after 

midnight, concerning the parties’ August 17 claim construction submissions. We recognize that 

the parties are discussing the interpretation of the Court’s ruling of August 1 and that Your 

Honor, of course, knows best what that ruling encompassed. We write only to correct Orexo’s 

mistaken characterization of Mylan’s position, because an accurate understanding of Mylan’s 

proposed August 17 submission should assist in a resolution of the dispute. 

As set forth in our opening letter, Mylan’s intent is to supplement its identification 

of evidence in opposition to Orexo’s proposed claim constructions. Our understanding of the 

August 1 ruling is that we are permitted to supplement our opposition evidence with the NDA – 

which Orexo belatedly produced after the submission of the joint claim construction statement – 

and with other evidence, as proposed by Orexo’s counsel on the call. 

Much of Orexo’s letter addresses its misconception that Mylan intends to identify 

additional evidence in support of Mylan’s claim constructions, and its arguments that this should 

Case 3:11-cv-03788-MAS-LHG Document 82 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 800
Honorable Lois H. Goodman, U.S.M.J. 

August 10, 2012 

Page Two 

KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP

not be permitted. Since Mylan has no such intention, most of Orexo’s arguments are irrelevant 

to the issue before the Court.1 

We appreciate the Court’s consideration. 

Respectfully, 

Beth D. Jacob 

cc: Errol Taylor, Esq. (via e-mail) 

Arnold Calmann, Esq. (via e-mail) 

John Flaherty, Esq (via e-mail) 

 1

 I have been advised by our local counsel that there is no need to respond to the 

personal attack in the first footnote of Orexo’s letter, since such attacks are inconsistent with 

accepted practice in the District of New Jersey. 

Case 3:11-cv-03788-MAS-LHG Document 82 Filed 08/10/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 801
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-36464, No. 333-107957, No. 333-117958, No. 333-129691 and No. 333-136695) of our report dated May 23, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial statements and
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, of Embarcadero Technologies, Inc., which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/S/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
|San Jose, California             
|May 23, 2007