alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW   Document 88   Filed 12/03/12   Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1142

Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW   Document 88   Filed 12/03/12   Page 2 of 6 PageID: 1143

Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW   Document 88   Filed 12/03/12   Page 3 of 6 PageID: 1144

Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW   Document 88   Filed 12/03/12   Page 4 of 6 PageID: 1145

Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW   Document 88   Filed 12/03/12   Page 5 of 6 PageID: 1146

Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW   Document 88   Filed 12/03/12   Page 6 of 6 PageID: 1147
Exhibit 32(i)

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The
undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-K filed by American Community Bancshares, Inc. (the Issuer) for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates
and for the periods presented therein.



|                     |  |                                    
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2009 |  | /s/ Randy P. Helton                
|                     |  | Randy P. Helton                    
|                     |  | President & Chief Executive Officer



116
**Exhibit 21.1****SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**         **Name of Subsidiary (Jurisdiction)** **Ownership**          IVANHOE ENERGY INTERNATIONAL INC. (BVI)  100%             IVANHOE ENERGY HOLDINGS INC. (Nevada)  100%    Ivanhoe Energy Royalty Inc. (Nevada)  100% (indirect)Ivanhoe Energy (USA) Inc. (Nevada)  100% (indirect)Ivanhoe HTL Petroleum Ltd. (Nevada)  15% (indirect)Ivanhoe Energy Petroleum Projects Inc. (Nevada)  100% (indirect)Ivanhoe Energy HTL (USA) Inc. (Nevada & California)  100% (indirect)         IVANHOE ENERGY INTERNATIONAL VENTURES INC. (BVI)  100%    Ivanhoe Energy Sweetwater Limited (Malta)  100% (indirect)Ivanhoe Energy (Middle East) Inc. (BVI)  100% (indirect)Energy Resources Development Japan Corporation (Japan)  99% (indirect)Ivanhoe Energy (Latin America) Inc. (BVI)  100% (indirect)         SUNWING HOLDING CORPORATION (Barbados)  100%    Sunwing Energy Ltd. (Bermuda)  100% (indirect)Sunwing Management Limited (Hong Kong)  99% (indirect)Sunwing Zitong Energy Ltd. (BVI)  100% (indirect)Pan-China Resources Ltd. (BVI)  100% (indirect)Dagang Resources Ltd. (BVI)  100% (indirect)         IVANHOE ENERGY ADVISORY INC. (BVI)  100%             IVANHOE ENERGY HTL INC. (Nevada)  100%    Ivanhoe HTL Petroleum Ltd. (Nevada & California)  85% (indirect)ITS Ensyn LLC (USA)  50% (indirect)Ensyn Petroleum (Canada) Inc.  100% (indirect)EEC Management Corp. (USA)  22.5% (indirect)Ensyn Energy Management L.P. (USA)  .10% (indirect)Ensyn Energy Corp. (Delaware)  100% (indirect)EEC Management Corp. (USA)  55% (indirect)Ensyn Energy Management L.P. (USA)  71.36% (indirect)EEC Management Corp. (USA)  22.5% (indirect)Ensyn Energy Management L.P. (USA)  28.54% (indirect)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 

 ORDER

 v.

ANDREW AURNHEIMER 

 

 

 MAGISTRATE NO. 11-4022-02(CCC)

The financial inability of the defendant to retain counsel having been established by the

Court, and the defendant not having waived the appointment of counsel,

It is on this 23 day of February, 2011 , rd

ORDERED that Candace Homm from the Office of the Federal Public Defender for the

District of New Jersey is hereby appointed to represent said defendant in the cause until further order

of the Court.

 S/Patty Shwartz 

PATTY SHWARTZ 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 16 Filed 02/23/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 55
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 BROOKSIDE
TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS CORP., INC.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of Brookside
Technology Holdings Corp., Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15e for the small business issuer and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidating subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small
business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting.
  By:
Name:
    
    /s/ Bryan McGuire

Bryan McGuireTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
(

0555 Linwood Creene — Suite 12 VANESSA E. JAMES (609) 601-8577 Telefax Linwood, New Jersey 08221

(609) 601-8677 Gloucester County Office: (609) 601-8577 - Telefax JEFFRF’ A. JAKETLC 91 Circle Avenue

JEFFREY Pitman, New Jersey 08071 P. SARVAS. O COuNSEL

(856) 244-1854

Email: vjames©barkerlawfirm,net

By Appointment Only

‘CERTBymESW€MCoRTop Webcite:

LcrNsEe TO Pi’AcncE e-mail: TCel1and@ BarkerLawFirm.net

PLFASI REPLY TO

CAMDEN CouNTY OFFIcE

July 29, 2013

The Honorable Joel Schneider, Magistrate Judge United States District Court for the

District of New Jersey/ Camden Vicinage Mitchell H. Cohen Building & US Courthouse

One John F. Gerry Plaza

Camden, New Jersey 08101

Re: Tracey Miller, Sr. v Waterford Township, Sergeant Joseph McNally, Officer Timothy Lyons, Evesham Township, and Officer Bernard Davis

Civil Action Number: 11—cv---3405 (JEI/ JS) And

Re: S.M. (A Minor) Tracey Miller, Sr. Guardian ad Litem for S.M. V Waterford__Townsp, Sergeant Joseph McNally, Officer Timothy Lyons, Evesham Township, and Officer Bernard Davis

Civil Action Number: 11cv-3579 (JBS/JS)

And

Re: Ronald Miller, Sr. and Levine Miller v Waterford Township,

Civil Action Number:

Dear Judne Schneider:

In accord with Your Honor’s Letter Order of June 28, 2013, dlspositive motions are due to be filed with the Court by July 31, 2013. Since Your Honor’s ruling, she deposition of Officer Staiger
ct

o

Nu

be

: 1 1

cv

3579 (JBS/JS)

And

Re: Ronald Miller, Sr. and Lavina Miller v WaiforclImvnshj, er al.

Civil Action Number: 1 l.cv-3578 ØBS/JS)

Our Pile Number: 47620-124

(scheduled for July 8, 2013) was rescheduled for today, July 29th, (The

witness was present and the deposition went forward.)

In light of the adjourned deposition of Officer Staiger, and the

timeframe needed for the transcript to be produced, reviewed, and

perhaps made a part of the Motion for Summary Judgment, we

ctfullyrequestatwoweekadournforfiiindisosit

motions to August 14, 2Q_

We have communicated with our adversary, and Mr. Fiore poses no

objection.

Respectfully Submitted:

BARKER, GELFAND & JANES

A PRossxoNJ1 CoRPoIuTIoN

s/ Todd J. Gelfand

By:

Todd J. Gelfand, Esquire

cc: Charles Fiore, Esquire

Attorney for Plaintiffs

J. Brooks DiDonato, Esquire

Attorney for Evesham Townshin and Officer Davi

James R. Birchmeier, Esquire

Attorney for Sergeant McNally and Officer Lyons

Township of Waterford:

John Maroccia, Esquire/ Solicitor

Ciief of Police John W. Knoll

BARKER, GELFAND &JAMES A PROFESSIONAL CoRPoRATION VO0RHEES, NEW JERsEY 08043
NASH WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

J. BENTIVEGNA, NEW JERSEY

DIVISION OF STATE POLICE,

SUPERINTENDENT OF NEW JERSEY

DIVISION OF STATE POLICE, AND

JOHN DOES 1-10,

Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

HONORABLE JOSEPH E. IRENAS

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-4018

(JEI/KMW)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

 

APPEARANCES:

FARRELL & THURMAN, PC

By: Douglass L. Derry

172 Tamarack Circle

Skillman, NJ 08558

Counsel for Plaintiff

GLUCK WALRATH, LLP

By: David Allan Clark

428 River View Plaza

Trenton, NJ 08611

Counsel for Defendant J. Bentivegna

IRENAS, Senior District Judge:

This matter having been opened to the Court on Defendant J.

Bentivegna’s Notice of Removal, the Court having considered the

submission of Defendant Bentivegna, and for good cause appearing;

IT IS on this 19th day of July, 2011,

ORDERED THAT:

(1) Plaintiff shall show cause in writing why an order

should not be entered dismissing the New Jersey

Case 1:11-cv-04018-JEI-KMW Document 2 Filed 07/19/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 17
Division of State Police and the Superintendent of New

Jersey Division of State Police from this action on the

basis that these parties enjoy sovereign immunity under

the Eleventh Amendment to the United States

Constitution and are therefore immune from suit in this

Court. See Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651, 662 1

(1974)(“[A]n unconsenting State is immune from suits

brought in federal courts by her own citizens as well

as by citizens of another State.”)

(2) Plaintiff’s brief on this matter shall be filed with

the Court (with a copy sent directly to Chambers) by

5:00 p.m., Tuesday, July 26, 2011.

(3) Defendants’ briefs, if any, shall be filed with the 

 Court (with a copy sent directly to Chambers) by 

 5:00 p.m., Tuesday, August 2, 2011.

 s/ Joseph E. Irenas 

JOSEPH E. IRENAS

Senior United States District Judge

 If either of these parties is amenable to suit in this 1

Court, then the Complaint must be remanded to the Superior Court

of New Jersey because all of the Defendants have not consented to

the removal. See Balazik v. County of Dauphin, 44 F.3d 209, 213

(3d Cir. 1995)(“[I]t is well established that removal generally

requires unanimity among the defendants.”)

2

Case 1:11-cv-04018-JEI-KMW Document 2 Filed 07/19/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 18
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, July 30, 2009, 2 p.m. to July 30, 2009, 4:30 p.m., NIEHS/National Institutes of Health, Keystone Building, 530 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 2, 2009, FR E9-15689.                

The meeting date was changed from July 30, 2009 to August 12, 2009 and the meeting time was changed from 2 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: July 9, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-17039 Filed 7-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Chart 1-5. The percentage of the population that is employed 

has trended up since September 2003

Percent

54

56

58

60

62

64

66

1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006

54

56

58

60

62

64

66

NOTE: Shaded areas represent recessions. Data are seasonally adjusted.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Chart 1-5. The percentage of the population that is employed 

has trended up since September 2003

• The proportion of the population 16 years and over that is employed fell from a 

pre-recession peak of 64.7 percent in April 2000 to 62.0 percent in September 

2003. The ratio has trended up since then. 

• While the employment-population ratio rose to 63.4 percent by the end of 

2006, it was still well below its pre-recession peak.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Darrel Slack, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Centillium Communications, Inc. (the “registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with Amendment No.1 to the Quarterly Report of PRIMEDIA Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, KellyP. Conlin, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Kelly P. Conlin                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Kelly  P. Conlin                       |
| Chief  Executive Officer and President |
| November  8, 2004                      |

 

This certificationaccompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Case 2:11-cv-03592-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 06/20/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 1
Case 2:11-cv-03592-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 06/20/11 Page 2 of 8 PageID: 2
Case 2:11-cv-03592-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 06/20/11 Page 3 of 8 PageID: 3
Case 2:11-cv-03592-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 06/20/11 Page 4 of 8 PageID: 4
Case 2:11-cv-03592-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 06/20/11 Page 5 of 8 PageID: 5
Case 2:11-cv-03592-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 06/20/11 Page 6 of 8 PageID: 6
Case 2:11-cv-03592-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 06/20/11 Page 7 of 8 PageID: 7
Case 2:11-cv-03592-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 06/20/11 Page 8 of 8 PageID: 8
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5256 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5256

        To suspend temporarily the duty on Polyethylene HE2591.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 2004

 Mr. Aderholt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on Polyethylene HE2591.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POLYETHYLENE HE2591.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.39.33      Polyethylene        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         HE2591 (CAS No.                                                    31/2008
                         25087-43-7), with
                         l-butene as
                         comonomer
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3901.20.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

WAYNE O. REVEL, JR.

,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE

,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee. §

§

§ No. 177 , 2020

§

§ Court Below: Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No. 1906000518 (S)

§

§

§

Submitted: October 19 , 2020

Decided: October 28 , 2020

O R D E R

On June 16 , 2020, the Court issued a briefing schedule; the appellant’s

opening brief was due July 31 , 2020. On August 5 , 2020, the Chief Deputy Clerk

sent a brief delinquency letter to the appellant. On August 24 , 2020, the Chief

Deputy Clerk issued a notice, sent by certified mail, directing the appellant to show

cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for his failu re to file his opening brief

and appendix

. On September 8, 2020, t he postal service returned the August 24

notice with the designations “attempted

- not known” and “unable to forward.” On

September 16 , 2020, the Senior Court Clerk obtained an updated address for the

appellant and resent the notice to the new address by certified mail. On October 6,

2020, the Chief Deputy Clerk resent the notice to the new address by first

- class mail.

On October 19 , 2020, the pos tal service returned the September 16 notice with the2

designations “unclaimed” and “unable to forward.” The appellant having failed to

respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten

- day period or to report

any change of address to the Court, dismissal of this action is deemed unopposed.

N OW, THEREFORE, IT IS OR DERED, under Supreme Court Rule s 3(b) (2)

and 29(b) , that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice