alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 134 (Wednesday, July 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16862]



[[Page 34372]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (NSF)


National Science Board Ad Hoc Committee on Nominations for the 
NSB Class of 2010-2016; Sunshine Act Meetings; Notice

    The National Science Board's ad hoc Committee on Nominations for 
the NSB Class of 2010-2016, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 
614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-
5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby 
gives notice in regard to the scheduling of meetings for the 
transaction of National Science Board business and other matters 
specified, as follows:

Date and Time: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 2 p.m.

Subject Matter:  Nominations for the National Science Board Class of 
2016.

Status:  Closed.
    This meeting will be held by teleconference originating at the 
National Science Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Please refer to the National Science Board 
Web site (http://www.nsf.gov/nsb) for information or schedule updates, 
or contact: Kim Silverman, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7000.

Ann Ferrante,
Writer-Editor.
[FR Doc. E9-16862 Filed 7-13-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Embarcadero
Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Stephen Wong, Chief Financial Officer, and Raj
Sabhlok, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                                      
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    STEPHEN WONGStephen Wong President and Chief Executive Officer



Date: March
12, 2004



|    |  |                                                                                                         
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    RAJ SABHLOKRaj Sabhlok Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Corporate Development



Date: March 12, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 49 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 49

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To permanently extend the moratorium enacted by the Internet Tax 
                  Freedom Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Internet Tax Nondiscrimination 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF INTERNET TAX FREEDOM ACT MORATORIUM.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 1101 of the Internet Tax 
Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) Moratorium.--No State or political subdivision thereof may 
impose any of the following taxes:
            ``(1) Taxes on Internet access.
            ``(2) Multiple or discriminatory taxes on electronic 
        commerce.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--(1) Section 1101 of the Internet Tax 
Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) is amended by striking subsection (d).
    (2) Section 1104(10) of the Internet Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 
note) is amended by striking ``unless'' and all that follows through 
``1998''.
    (3) Section 1104(2)(B)(i) of the Internet Tax Freedom Act (47 
U.S.C. 151 note) is amended by striking ``except with respect to a tax 
(on Internet access) that was generally imposed and actually enforced 
prior to October 1, 1998,''.
    (c) Clarification.--The second sentence of section 1104(5), and the 
second sentence of section 1101(e)(3)(D), of the Internet Tax Freedom 
Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) are each amended by inserting ``, except to 
the extent such services are used to provide Internet access'' before 
the period.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                H. R. 49

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To permanently extend the moratorium enacted by the Internet Tax 
                  Freedom Act, and for other purposes.
```
##### 



Exhibit 10.3
  GLG GLOBAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
    
    GLG PARTNERS, INC.
390 PARK AVENUE,
20THFLOOR
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022
Telephone +1 (212) 224 7200
www.glgpartners.com
  
     Sincerely,
GLG Partners, Inc.By:
    /s/  Simon WhiteName:
    Simon WhiteTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer Accepted and agreed to:/s/  Alejandro San MiguelAlejandro San Miguel




---



##### 



PERFORMANCE GOALS
 Alejandro San Miguel
Years 2007-2013
 Award Vesting Date
    
    
    Performance GoalFirst anniversary of the Grant Date
(November 2, 2008)
    
    
    AUM as of October 31, 2008 is not
less than[***]% of the AUM as of
October 31, 2007.Second anniversary of the Grant Date
(November 2, 2009)
    
    
    AUM as of October 31, 2009 is not
less than[***]% of the AUM as of
October 31, 2008.Third anniversary of the Grant Date
(November 2, 2010)
    
    
    AUM as of October 31, 2010 is not
less than[***]% of the AUM as of
October 31, 2009.Fourth anniversary of the Grant Date
(November 2, 2011)
    
    
    AUM as of October 31, 2011 is not
less than[***]% of the AUM as of
October 31, 2010.Fifth anniversary of the Grant Date
(November 2, 2012)
    
    
    AUM as of October 31, 2012 is not
less than[***]% of the AUM as of
October 31, 2011.Sixth anniversary of the Grant Date
(November 2, 2013)
    
    
    AUM as of October 31, 2013 is not
less than[***]% of the AUM as of
October 31, 2012.
 Operating Rules
#### Cox *et al. v.*The State.

Bleckley, C. J. — The evidence warranted the finding of guilty by the judge, and it does not affirmatively appear with sufficient certainty that any error was committed in refusing to rule out testimony.

October 15, 1894.

Accusation of gaming. Before Judge Westmoreland. Criminal court of Atlanta. September term, 1894.

Howell C. Erwin, for plaintiffs in error.

Lewis W. Thomas, solicitor, *contra.*

*Judgment affirmed.*
Case 3:11-mj-05028-TJB     Document 21     Filed 06/13/11     Page 1 of 1 PageID: 101
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5138 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to establish an equitable ceiling on 

credit card interest rates, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2004 

Mr. BELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to establish an equitable 

ceiling on credit card interest rates, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Credit Card Inter5 est Rate Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CREDIT CARD INTEREST RATE CEILING. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of the Truth in Lend8 ing Act (15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) is amended by inserting 

9 after section 109 the following new section: 
2 

•HR 5138 IH 

1 ‘‘§ 110. Limitations on credit card interest rates 

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—During any calendar quarter, no 

3 creditor may impose a finance charge under any open end 

4 consumer credit plan involving a credit card which results 

5 in an annual percentage rate greater than 10 percentage 

6 points over the most recent composite prime rate pub7 lished in the Wall Street Journal before the beginning of 

8 the 10-business-day period ending on the first day of such 

9 calendar quarter. 

10 ‘‘(b) REGULATIONS BY BOARD.—The Board may 

11 prescribe such regulations as the Board may, in the discre12 tion of the Board, determine to be appropriate to imple13 ment and carry out the requirements of subsection (a), 

14 including the determination and publication of the applica15 ble maximum annual percentage rate under such sub16 section for any calendar quarter.’’. 

17 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

18 for chapter 1 of the Truth in Lending Act is amended 

19 by inserting after the item relating to section 109 the fol20 lowing new item: 

‘‘110. Limitation on credit card interest rates.’’. 

21 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

22 this section shall apply with respect to calendar quarters 

23 that begin after the end of the 6-month period beginning 

24 on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 40108 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

FRANCISCO ARAIZA

- RODRIGUEZ ,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:18

- CR

- 354

- 1

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco Araiza

Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Araiza

- Rodriguez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 30, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-40108 Document: 00515181040 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/30/2019No. 19

- 40108

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leav e to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-40108 Document: 00515181040 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/30/2019
#### Renee Hadida, Appellant, v Austin Ventures Corp., Respondent.

[853 NYS2d 904]

While standing outside a door to premises owned by the defendant, the plaintiff was struck by the door, which was pushed open by an individual exiting the premises. The plaintiff subsequently commenced this action to recover damages for the personal injuries which she allegedly sustained in the accident, claiming that the door in question was dangerous and defective.

The evidence which the defendant submitted in support of its motion for summary judgment, including the deposition testimony and affidavit of the defendant’s co-owner, Gary Salvit, established, prima facie, that the door did not constitute a dangerous or defective condition *(see Mullaney v Koenig,*21 AD3d 939 [2005]). The submission of the plaintiffs expert in opposition to the motion failed to raise a triable issue as to whether the condition of the door constituted a violation of a statute or code or raise any other triable issue of fact *(see Hargrove v Baltic Estates,*278 AD2d 278, 279 [2000]). Mastro, J.P., Covello, Eng and Belen, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5374 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5374

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 30777 Rancho California Road in Temecula, California, as the ``Dalip 
                  Singh Saund Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 2004

 Mr. Issa (for himself, Mr. Filner, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mrs. 
     Bono, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Cox, Mr. Pombo, Mr. Gary G. Miller of 
 California, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. McKeon, Mr. 
     Dreier, Mr. Lewis of California, Mr. Ose, Mr. Radanovich, Mr. 
   Rohrabacher, Mr. Royce, Mr. Nunes, Mr. Herger, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. 
Thomas, Mr. Baca, Mr. Berman, Mr. Matsui, Ms. Woolsey, Ms. Pelosi, Mrs. 
 Tauscher, Mr. Lantos, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Farr, Mr. Cardoza, Mrs. Capps, 
Mr. Schiff, Mr. Waxman, Mr. Becerra, Ms. Roybal-Allard, and Ms. Eshoo) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 30777 Rancho California Road in Temecula, California, as the ``Dalip 
                  Singh Saund Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DALIP SINGH SAUND POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 30777 Rancho California Road in Temecula, California, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Dalip Singh Saund Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Dalip Singh 
Saund Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ivanhoe Energy Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a  15(f) and 15d  15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a.) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c.) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andd.) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a.) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 b.) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
    By:
    
    /s/ E. Leon DanielE. Leon Daniel
 94
#### California & Oregon Land Co. *v.*Munz.

*(Circuit Court,*D. *Oregon.*

February *14, 1887.)*

Deady, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff, a corporation duly formed under the laws of California, against the defendant, a citizen of Oregon, to recover the possession of the E. i of section 21, in township 86 S., of rango 14 E. of the Willamet meridian. It was heard and submitted with the foregoing- case of *Pengra*v. *Munz, ante,*830.

The facts and circumstances of the two cases are similar, except that in this case tho defendant, on June 25, 1880, took a lease for one year from tho plaintiff for the north half of the section at a rent of §80, and covenanted therein to surrender the premises to the lessor at tho end of the term. The lease was evidently intended to cover the east half instead of the north half of tho section, as that was the portion belonging to the lessor. But it took effect at least as a lease of the north-east quarter, and by reason of it the defendant is estopped to deny the *838plaintiff’s title thereto. It is familiar learning that a tenant is estopped to deny his landlord’s title, either during the term or the continuance of the possession taken under the lease. 1 Washb. Real Prop, 356; *Zeller*v. *Eckert,*4 How. 289; *Sawyer*v. *Sargent,*7 Pac. Rep. 120.

In his testimony, the defendant says that he was imposed úpon in this matter by the agent of the plaintiff, from whom he took the lease. But the circumstances do not support the assertion. The agent simply told the defendant that the plaintiff had the title to the land, and that, if he cut hay on it, without his permission, he would be prosecuted; when the defendant, to use his own language, asked for and obtained the lease, to save trouble. Afterwards, when the mistake was made in listing the section as swamp land, the defendant undertook to take advantage of it, and buy in what he doubtless thought was a paramount title to that of his landlord, and thereby hold the possession in his own right.

There must be a finding for the plaintiff in this case as in the other.
H. Walls

Crim. No. 11-276 (WHW) V.

CONTINUANCE ORDER CHARLES CURRY

This matter having come before the Court on the joint

application of Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the

District of New Jersey (by Shirley U. Emehelu, Assistant U.S.

Attorney), and defendant Charles Curry (by Patrick N. McMahon,

Esq.) for an order granting a continuance of the proceedings in

the above-captioned matter, and the defendant being aware that he

has a right to have the matter brought to trial within 70 days of

the date of his appearance before a judicial officer of this

court pursuant to Title 18 of the United States Code, Section

3161(c) (1), and as the defendant has consented to such a

continuance, and for good and sufficient cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should

be continued for the following reasons:

1. Defense counsel requires adequate time to review

the discovery provided by the United States;

2. Taking into account the exercise of diligence,

therefore, the facts of this case require that defense counsel be
to negotiate a plea agreement, which would render trial of this

matter unnecessary;

4. Defendant has consented to the aforementioned

continuance; and

S. Pursuant to Title 18 of the United States Code,

Section 3161(h) (7), the ends of justice served by granting the

continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial.

WHEREFORE, on this

day of May, 2011,

IT IS ORDERED that defense motions shall be filed by

August 12, 2011, the government’s response shall be filed by

September 12, 2011, a motions hearing will be held on September

19, 2011, and the trial is scheduled for September 20, 2011; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period from the date of

this order through and including September 20, 2011, shall be

excludable in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974,

pursuant to Title 18, United States Cod , Section 3161 h) (7).

HON. WJ,J.Wi{. WALLS

United States District Judge
, 

ttorney

PATRICK MCMAHON

Assistant Federal Public Defender Counsel for defendant Charles Curry
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
ONI Systems Corp.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (Nos.
333-38288, 333-38290 and 333-56304) on Form S-8 of ONI Systems Corp. of our
report dated January 31, 2002, except Note 17, which is as of February 20, 2002,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of ONI Systems Corp. as of
December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2001, which report appears in the December
31, 2001, annual report on Form 10-K of ONI Systems Corp.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Mountain View, California
March 13, 2002