alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-20249

Summary Calendar

CHRISTOFOROS G POLITIS

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY; SHARON HUDSON, District Director for the 38th District;

CHARLES ARENDALE, Field Office Director; DAVID LEONG, Deportation

Officer

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CV-3229

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Former immigration detainee Christoforos Politis, a native of Greece,

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents

of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), civil suit alleging that

several defendants, including Michael Chertoff, the Secretary of Homeland

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 4, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-20249

2

Security, had unconstitutionally detained him for an indefinite period of time

and had refused to provide him with adequate medical care during this

detention. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants after

concluding that it did not have personal jurisdiction over Chertoff, that the

defendants were entitled to qualified immunity, and that Politis had failed to

state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

Politis argues that the grant of summary judgment was inappropriate

because the district court erred in not liberally construing his pleadings and in

finding that it did not have personal jurisdiction over Chertoff. Politis also

claims that the defendants retaliated against him by filing criminal charges for

failure to cooperate in his deportation proceedings and by expeditiously

deporting him to Greece; however these particular issues are independent from

and not related to the claims that form the basis of this Bivens suit and are not

properly before this court. See Dollis v. Rubin, 77 F.3d 777, 779 & n.2 (5th Cir.

1995); Quezada v. INS, 898 F.2d 474, 477 (5th Cir. 1990).

Politis was deported while this case was pending. Accordingly, to the

extent that he seeks injunctive relief or specific performance to remedy his

alleged wrongful detention, his claims are moot. See Herman v. Holiday,

238 F.3d 660, 665 (5th Cir. 2001).

Politis fails to adequately brief those issues that are properly before this

court, thus, they are considered abandoned. Hughes v. Johnson, 191 F.3d 607,

613 (5th Cir. 1993). Politis’s appeal lacks any issue of arguable merit. See

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Therefore, we dismiss it as

frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
Case 2:11-cv-03614-FSH-PS Document 1-6 Filed 06/20/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 24
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Skagit State Bancorp, Inc.  on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Cheryl Bishop, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Carla F. Tucker, Executive Vice-President/Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
| /s/   Cheryl R. Bishop                  |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Cheryl   R. Bishop                      |   |
| President   and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

 
| /s/   Carla F. Tucker      |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Carla   F. Tucker          |   |
| Executive   Vice-President |   |
| Chief   Financial Officer  |   |

 

 
| May 10,   2011 |   |
|---------------------|--------|
| Date                |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT C 

Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 383-4 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 15678
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 383-4 Filed 12/15/17 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 15679
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 383-4 Filed 12/15/17 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 15680
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 383-4 Filed 12/15/17 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 15681
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 383-4 Filed 12/15/17 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 15682
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tube City IMS Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel E. Rosati, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ DANIEL E. ROSATI                                        
|Daniel E. Rosati                                            
|Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|Tube City IMS Corporation                                   
|November 1, 2007                                            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tube
City IMS Corporation and will be retained by Tube City IMS Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5194 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5194

  To clarify that service marks, collective marks, and certification 
 marks are entitled to the same protections, rights, and privileges of 
                              trademarks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 30, 2004

Mr. Simpson (for himself, Mr. Otter, Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, and Mr. 
   Jenkins) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To clarify that service marks, collective marks, and certification 
 marks are entitled to the same protections, rights, and privileges of 
                              trademarks.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROTECTIONS, RIGHTS, AND PRIVILEGES OF SERVICE MARKS, 
              COLLECTIVE MARKS, AND CERTIFICATION MARKS.

    The Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the registration and 
protection of trade-marks used in commerce, to carry out the provisions 
of certain international conventions, and for other purposes'', 
approved July 5, 1946 (commonly referred to as the Trademark Act of 
1946) is amended--
            (1) in section 3 (15 U.S.C. 1053) in the first sentence, by 
        striking ``protection'' and inserting ``protections, rights, 
        and privileges''; and
            (2) in section 4 (15 U.S.C. 1054) in the first sentence, by 
        striking ``protection'' and inserting ``protections, rights, 
        and privileges''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Centillium Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, J. Scott Kamsler, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  §1350, as adopted pursuant to  §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Dated: March 13, 2006 | /s/ J. Scott Kamsler
                     J. Scott Kamsler Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Case 2:11-cr-00204-SDW Document 30 Filed 05/10/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 84
Case 2:11-cr-00204-SDW Document 30 Filed 05/10/12 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 85
Case 2:11-cr-00204-SDW Document 30 Filed 05/10/12 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 86
Case 2:11-cr-00204-SDW Document 30 Filed 05/10/12 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 87
Case 2:11-cr-00204-SDW Document 30 Filed 05/10/12 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 88
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tube City IMS Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, I Michael Coslov, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|/s/ I MICHAEL COSLOV                                                                        
|I Michael Coslov Chairman and Chief Executive Office Tube City IMS Corporation July 31,
2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tube
City IMS Corporation and will be retained by Tube City IMS Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAE 

AUSTIN 
fIonorfMe *o. IT. Shhagpard, Page 2 

Hooonble Qeo. & Shqmrd~ Paw L 
at lntoraatloa, nnd ia turn obtain& ourrio. up 

01% a brsle of oht~gee rixed or appmwed b;r theaselves ha6 aat made thds cnterprlfm a *eomeroial* 

axle. f t ia t&air nethod ot sattlng us a alaarine; 

house or information concerning credit or proposed purahasera an6 oudtogers, &iOh is nn essential facta in thdr buafnoaa, end they ZUB'X 

doubt are thun twmetins their aredlt arralrs ar 

effioiratly and at a~ 15~ @aat ;ay tha)r ojluld bo 

athem ooa&ueto& 9isrousrd 3x8 teaha sat z&lee 

lfnble r0r tbls taxa 
It is our oplafon Chat, andor the faatr, we hwo 

bsrore un, ma Me$ionl md matal Semlaa Buruma ia not 

liable ror the .groas reaeipta tax 3~0tlded rw in &Mole 

7041, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas. 

Ceoil 0. Rotmh 

A88lcIttmt 

AppflOVEDF?dB 26, 1940
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-116612) pertaining to the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and the Amended and Restated StockIncentive Plan, as amended, of Blackboard Inc. of our reports dated January 27, 2005, with respectto the consolidated financial statements of Blackboard Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP                              
McLean, Virginia
Notice of Dimissal

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

KIWANDA COATES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION

vs. ) FILE NO. 2:11-cv-3565

)

) NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,)

GC SERVICES FINANCIAL CORP, )

DLS ENTERPRISES, INC. )

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________)

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiff has filed with the Clerk of 

the District Court of New Jersey, Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of 

Case Without Prejudice.

 Respectfully submitted this 9th day of September, 2011.

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

Kiwanda Coates

/s/ Dennis R. Kurz

Dennis R. Kurz

NJ Bar No. 4570453

Weisberg & Meyers, LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiff

5025 N. Central Ave., #602

Phoenix, AZ 85012

(888) 595-9111 ext. 412

(866) 842-3303 (fax)

dkurz@attorneysforconsumers.com

Case 2:11-cv-03565-SDW-MCA Document 9 Filed 09/09/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 34
Notice of Dimissal

Page 2 of 2

Notice Filed electronically on this 9th day of September, 2011, with: 

United States District Court CM/ECF system

Jessica DeCandia

s/Jessica. DeCandia

Case 2:11-cv-03565-SDW-MCA Document 9 Filed 09/09/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 35
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Criminal Action No.: 11-353 (JLL)

v.
ORDER

BAHADIR YAHSI,

LINARES, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on various motions in limine filed by the parties. For

the,reasons places on the record on April 2, 2012,
“IT IS on this 2” day of April, 2012 :
“ORDERED that Defendant's motion to exclude Defendant’s January 9, 2012 plea

colloquies to the state charge and to violation of probation charges is GRANTED; and it is
further :

ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to exclude Defendant’s March 29, 2004 plea is
DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to exclude testimonial evidence regarding
Defendant’s putative trafficking in Crack Cocaine in early 2009 is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to exclude communications between the
Cooperating Informant (the “CI”) and the Defendant regarding his state charges is GRANTED;
and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to exclude the testimony of Special Agent Jason
Frederick is DENIED, except that Agent Frederick may not testify as to the addictive nature of
illegal drugs; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to exclude the Government’s proffered Fed. R.
Evid. 609 evidence is DENIED; and it is further



ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to publish certain documents during the cross-
examination of the Government’s witnesses is DENIED; however certain portions of audio
evidence may be allowed to be played with the Court’s permission, if allowed, on application by
Defendant; and it is further
ORDERED that the Government’s motion to exclude Defendant’s immigration expert is
GRANTED; however, the Court reserves decision on whether any explanation regarding
immigration law may be necessary to be given to the jury; and it is further
ORDERED that the Government’s motion to exclude an October 1, 2010 conversation
between Defendant’s wife and the CI is GRANTED; and it is further;
ORDERED that transcripts of the recordings played at trial will be available to the jurors
during deliberations as aids; and it is further
ORDERED that Defendant’s Outrageous Government Conduct Motion is DENIED
without prejudice to be remade, if appropriate, based on new evidence that arises at trial and not
available to the ‘Court at this ‘time. ¢
SO ORDERED. o

s/ Jose L. Linares
JOSE L. LINARES
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
* Effective March 31, 1995, the functions of the Secr etary of Health and

Human Services in social security cases were transf erred to the Commissioner of Social Security. P.L. No. 103-296. Pursuant to Fe d. R. App. P. 43(c), Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security, is substituted for Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services, as the defe ndant in this action. Although we have substituted the Commissioner for the Secretary in the caption, in the text we continue to refer to the Secretary b ecause she was the appropriate party at the time of the underlying decision.

** This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

*** Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior Circuit Judge, Un ited States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designat ion.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 8/14/96 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
CLARENCE M. KING, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. SHIRLEY S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, *

Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-5282 (D.C. No. 94-C-586-J) (N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT **

Before PORFILIO, BRIGHT, *** and KELLY, Circuit Judges.-2-

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a dec ision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. Th e case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. We affirm for substantially the reasons given by th e district court. The judgment of the United States District Court fo r the Northern District of Oklahoma is affirmed.

Entered for the Court
Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         491,174
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,194,915
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (146,600)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,516,306
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,087,288
<PP&E>                                       1,626,119
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,420,611)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,292,796
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,256,011
<BONDS>                                         31,897
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,236,845
<COMMON>                                       182,148
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,414,105)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,292,796
<SALES>                                      3,507,532
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,225,027
<CGS>                                        2,780,698
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,780,698
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,855,389
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (421,188)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (421,188)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (421,188)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.66)
        

</TABLE>
S. 1321 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit interference with voting systems 

under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defending the Integrity of Voting 

Systems Act’’. 

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON INTERFERENCE WITH VOTING SYSTEMS. 

Section 1030(e) of title 18, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (2)— 

(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

(B) in subparagraph (B), by adding ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

and 

(C) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(C) that— 

‘‘(i) is part of a voting system; and 

‘‘(ii)(I) is used for the management, support, or 

administration of a Federal election; or 

‘‘(II) has moved in or otherwise affects interstate 

or foreign commerce;’’; 

(2) in paragraph (11), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(3) in paragraph (12), by striking the period and inserting 

a semicolon; and 

(4) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(13) the term ‘Federal election’ means any election (as 

defined in section 301(1) of the Federal Election Campaign 

Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30101(1))) for Federal office (as defined 

in section 301(3) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 

1971 (52 U.S.C. 30101(3))); and 
S. 1321—2 

‘‘(14) the term ‘voting system’ has the meaning given the 

term in section 301(b) of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 

(52 U.S.C. 21081(b)).’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129381 Michael F. Cavanagh 

129382 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

LAUREL YEOMANS and Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, STEVEN YEOMANS, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 129381, 129382 

 COA: 252216, 252392 

Wayne CC: 03-308574-NO 

WAYNE COUNTY and WAYNE COUNTY 

AIRPORT AUTHORITY, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 19, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0221 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 27, 2006 

Clerk