alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. ER98-4512-007; ER08-1164-002]

Take notice that on June 30, 2009, Consolidated Water Power Company and Escanaba Paper Company, tendered for filing their updated market power analysis and revised tariff sheets.

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*, or call (866)  208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. Eastern Time on July 21, 2009.                

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-16976 Filed 7-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT 32 .01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of N I S
Holdings, Corp (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),

I, Brian Stewart, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report
fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial  condition  and result of  operations of
the Company.

 /s/ Brian Stewart
    ------------
     Brian Stewart
 Chief Executive Officer

August 12, 2010
#### Cantrell *v.*The State.

Bleckley, C. J. — Beading the whole charge of the court together, it conforms substantially to the rule touching the establisment of an *alibi*and the doctrine of reasonable doubt, set forth .in *Harrison*v. *The State,*83 *Qa.*129; and there was no error in denying a new trial.

October 8, 1894.

Indictment for robbery. Before Judge Clark. Fulton superior court. March, term, 1894.

F. R. "Walker, for plaintiff in error.

C. D. Hill, solicitor-general, *contra.*

*Judgment affirmed,.*
#### KAHN-PFEIFFER CO. v. BRASSCO, S. R. L.

Civ. 54-249.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

March 16, 1950.

*290Lans, Goldstein, Golenbock & Abrams, New York City, for plaintiff, Asher Lans, New York City, of counsel.

Casey, Beinecke & Chase, New York City, for defendant, William S. Beinecke, Edward J. Madden, New York City, of counsel.

CONGER, District Judge.

Motion by plaintiff to discontinue this action pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

There are two actions pending between these parties for the same relief; one in the Supreme Court of the State of New York and the other (this action) in this Court. Issue has been joined in each action. The actions are identical. Ordinarily, this motion might very well be granted. It does appear that the action in the State Court may be reached for trial much quicker than the action here. In the State Court a preference may be had because of the nature of the action find the trial could be had in June of this year. In this Court the trial could not be had until probably next fall or winter.

However, in this court complications have arisen. To grant the motion at this time would greatly prejudice the defendant. At the present time pursuant to orders of Judge Irving Kaufman and Judge Sidney Sugarman defendant is in the midst of taking the examination of one of the partners of plaintiff.

• In connection with this examination, defendant’s attorney intends to apply for an inspection of documents, pursuant to Rule 34 of the F.R.C.P. to effectuate and complete the examination.

In addition .there is pending in this Court a motion made by defendant to punish plaintiff’s attorney for contempt. Under the circumstances I feel that this motion should not be granted until those matters are disposed of.

.When this motion was argued before me I expressed my opinion to the attorneys involved that this whole problem could be settled easily and all the difficulties ironed out. I spent considerable time with them discussing the situation and finally suggested to them a plan whereby by stipulation their difficulties could be resolved. It was agreed that such a stipulation would be prepared and signed. Apparently, however, the attorneys have reached a stage where they cannot agree. I still think my plan was a good one. The stipulation [annexed hereto] follows generally but not fully my suggestion. I annex hereto the letters of the attorneys concerning the stipulation.

Under the circumstances I feel there is only one thing for me to do. The motion is denied without prejudice to a renewal thereof at an appropriate time.

Settle order on notice.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1355 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from 

gross income for AmeriCorps educational awards. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2019 

Mr. BENNET (for himself, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. BLUNT, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. 

COONS, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. PORTMAN, Mrs. SHAHEEN, and Mr. WICKER) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an exclusion from gross income for AmeriCorps educational awards. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Segal AmeriCorps 

5 Education Award Tax Relief Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF AMERICORPS 

7 EDUCATIONAL AWARDS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 117(c) 

9 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strikVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:36 May 11, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 \\ALPHA3\E\BILLS\S1355.IS S1355

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1355 IS

1 ing ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph (B), by striking the 

2 period at the end of subparagraph (C) and inserting ‘‘, 

3 or’’, and by adding at the end the following new subpara4 graph: 

5 ‘‘(D) a national service educational award 

6 under subtitle D of title I of the National and 

7 Community Service Act of 1990.’’. 

8 (b) EXCLUSION OF DISCHARGE OF STUDENT LOAN

9 DEBT.—Subsection (f) of section 108 of such Code is 

10 amended by adding at the end the following new para11 graph: 

12 ‘‘(6) PAYMENTS UNDER NATIONAL SERVICE

13 EDUCATIONAL AWARD PROGRAMS.—In the case of 

14 an individual, gross income shall not include any 

15 amount received under a national service educational 

16 award under subtitle D of title I of the National and 

17 Community Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12601 

18 et seq.).’’. 

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the 

21 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 13.1

                          CEO SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

                                   ----------

                         PSi TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.

          This certification is provided to PSi Technologies Holdings, Inc. (the
"Issuer") in connection with the preparation of the annual report on Form 20-F
(the "Form 20-F") for the period ended December 31, 2003 of Issuer.

          I, Arthur J. Young, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify
that:

     (1)  To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:

          (i)  the Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of section
               13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
               and

          (ii) the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in
               all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Issuer.

     (2)  I have reviewed the contents of this certificate with the Chief
          Financial Officer of Issuer.

          Dated: June 30, 2004.


                                        /s/ Arthur J. Young, Jr.
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Name: Arthur J. Young, Jr.
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer
MEMC Exhibit 10.35 - Director Plan - 12.31.12


Exhibit 10.35




Summary of Director Compensation 
Set forth below is a summary of the compensation paid by MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. (the “Company”) to its outside directors who are not employees of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company. Directors that are also employees of the Company receive no additional compensation for their service as a director. 
Initial Election to the Board of Directors 
Upon initial election to the MEMC Board of Directors, all outside directors are awarded non-qualified stock options for 25,000 shares of MEMC common stock. These options will have a strike price equal to the market value at date of grant and vest ratably over four years. 
Annual Compensation 
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) 
Annually (as of the date of the Annual Stockholder Meeting for that year), each person whose term on the Board of Directors extends for an additional year or who is expected to be nominated for re-election at such Annual Meeting of Stockholders, shall be awarded restricted stock units (RSUs) for shares of MEMC common stock having a value of approximately $185,000 on the date of grant (based on the closing price of MEMC common stock on the date of grant). Each RSU shall represent the right to receive one share of MEMC common stock. The actual number of RSUs to be awarded shall be determined in increments of 100 RSUs such that the value of the MEMC common stock underlying the RSUs is as close to $185,000 as possible. 
The RSUs shall vest 100% on the first anniversary of the date of grant.
Cash Compensation 
The directors shall receive the following cash compensation: 
An annual retainer of $50,000. 
An additional retainer of $50,000 for the Chairman of the Board. 
An additional retainer of $40,000 for the Chairman of the Audit Committee and an additional retainer of $10,000 for each other member of the Audit Committee. 
An additional retainer of $20,000 for the Chairman of the Compensation Committee and an additional retainer of $5,000 for each other member of the Compensation Committee. 
An additional retainer of $5,000 for the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. 
An additional fee of $1,000 for each Board and Committee meeting attended. 
Reimbursable Expenses 
All reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by a director for attending Board or Committee meetings will be reimbursed by the Company.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 131 (Friday, July 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16330]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Proposed Fee

    Authority:  Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act, (Title 
VIII, Pub. L. 108-447)
AGENCY: Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, USDA Forest Service.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, Naches Ranger 
District, proposes to charge new fees at four recreation sites. A $5.00 
per vehicle per night charge at Ponderosa Camp, Lost Meadow, Longmire 
Meadow and Long Meadow camp areas in the Little Naches drainage is 
under consideration. The fee would not apply to any towed vehicle(s). 
Fees are assessed based on the level of amenities and services 
provided, cost of operation and maintenance, market assessment, and 
public comment. Revenue generated would be used for operation and 
maintenance of existing facilities at the sites, increased services, 
and potential future improvements. The fees listed are only proposed 
and will be determined upon further analysis and public comment.

DATES: Submit comments on or before January 31, 2010. The proposed fee 
could be implemented as soon as May 2010.

ADDRESSES: Address all comments to Randall Shepard, Naches District 
Ranger, 10237 US Highway 12, Naches, Washington 98937, (509) 653-1401. 
Submit electronic comments and other data to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ea80888f838e86aa8c99c48c8f8ec49f99"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ce6eee9e5e8e0cceaffa2eae9e8a2f9ff">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Beidl (509) 653-1432.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement Act 
(Title VII, Pub. L. 108-447) directed the Secretary of Agriculture to 
publish a six month advance notice in the Federal Register whenever new 
recreation fee areas are established.
    Once public involvement is complete, these new fees will be 
reviewed by a Recreation Resource Advisory Committee prior to a final 
decision and implementation.

    Dated: July 6, 2009.
Randall Shepard,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. E9-16330 Filed 7-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 2:11-cr-00281-DMC Document 6 Filed 04/26/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 22
Case 2:11-cr-00281-DMC Document 6 Filed 04/26/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 23
Case 2:11-cr-00281-DMC Document 6 Filed 04/26/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 24
##### 



Exhibit 13.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officer of Satyam Computer Services Limited (the Company) hereby certifies,
to such officers knowledge, that: (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended March
31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: April 26, 2005
    /s/ Srinivas V.Director and Senior Vice
President  &Chief Financial Officer The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language
in such filing.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Shaw Hong, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of OmniVision Technologies, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
June 29, 2011

By:

/s/ SHAW HONGShaw HongChief Executive Officer and President


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR YEAR ENDING MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE SUCH TEKRON, INC. 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,873
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,873
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,104
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,873
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,227
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,227)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .000


</TABLE>
Case 2:10-cr-00445-DRD Document 4 Filed 07/06/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 7
Case 2:11-cr-00305-KM Document 14 Filed 08/25/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 25
Case 2:11-cr-00305-KM Document 14 Filed 08/25/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 26
Case 2:11-cr-00305-KM Document 14 Filed 08/25/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 27
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |   |                    |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
| Date: November 18, 2010  |   | /s/ Harold Brand        |   |
|                          |   | Harold Brand            |   |
|                          |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                          |   |                    |   |