alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
20. Persons at work 1 to 34 hours in all and in nonagricultural industries by reason for working less than 35 hours

and usual full- or part-time status

(Numbers in thousands)

Reason for working less than 35 hours

2007

All industries Nonagricultural industries

Total

Usually

 work

full time

Usually

 work

part time

Total

Usually

 work

full time

Usually

 work

part time

 Total, 16 years and over ................................................................... 32,435 9,976 22,460 31,902 9,813 22,089

Economic reasons ................................................................................ 4,401 1,697 2,704 4,317 1,647 2,670

 Slack work or business conditions ...................................................... 2,877 1,436 1,441 2,827 1,403 1,423

 Could only find part-time work ............................................................ 1,210 – 1,210 1,199 – 1,199

 Seasonal work .................................................................................... 175 122 53 154 106 48

 Job started or ended during week ...................................................... 139 139 – 137 137 –

Noneconomic reasons .......................................................................... 28,034 8,278 19,756 27,585 8,166 19,419

 Child-care problems ........................................................................... 728 72 656 723 72 651

 Other family or personal obligations ................................................... 5,739 799 4,940 5,657 787 4,870

 Health or medical limitations ............................................................... 853 – 853 830 – 830

 In school or training ............................................................................ 6,239 89 6,150 6,165 87 6,079

 Retired or Social Security limit on earnings ........................................ 2,200 – 2,200 2,106 – 2,106

 Vacation or personal day .................................................................... 3,579 3,579 – 3,539 3,539 –

 Holiday, legal or religious ................................................................... 582 582 – 579 579 –

 Weather-related curtailment ............................................................... 669 669 – 645 645 –

 All other reasons ................................................................................. 7,443 2,488 4,956 7,340 2,457 4,883

Average hours:

Economic reasons .............................................................................. 23.1 23.8 22.6 23.1 23.8 22.7

 Other reasons ..................................................................................... 21.3 25.0 19.8 21.4 25.0 19.8

 NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data. Dash indicates no data or data that do not meet publication

criteria.

235
Case 3:11-mj-05028-TJB   Document 26   Filed 06/13/11   Page 1 of 1 PageID: 107
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5209 

To adjust the boundary of Lowell National Historical Park, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 4, 2004 

Mr. MEEHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To adjust the boundary of Lowell National Historical Park, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lowell National His5 torical Park Boundary Adjustment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

7 The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for the establish8 ment of the Lowell National Historical Park in the Com9 monwealth of Massachusetts, and for other purposes’’ ap-
2 

•HR 5209 IH 

1 proved June 5, 1978 (Public Law 95–290; 92 Stat. 290; 

2 16 U.S.C. 410cc et seq.) is amended as follows: 

3 (1) In section 101(a), by adding a new para4 graph after paragraph (2) as follows: 

5 ‘‘(3) The boundaries of the park are modified 

6 to include five parcels of land identified on the map 

7 entitled ‘Boundary Adjustment, Lowell National 

8 Historical Park,’ numbered 475/81,424B and dated 

9 September 2004, and as delineated in section 

10 202(a)(2)(G).’’. 

11 (2) In section 202(a)(2), by adding at the end 

12 the following new subparagraph: 

13 ‘‘(G) The properties shown on the map 

14 identified in subsection (101)(a)(3) as follows: 

15 ‘‘(i) 91 Pevey Street. 

16 ‘‘(ii) The portion of 607 Middlesex 

17 Place. 

18 ‘‘(iii) Eagle Court. 

19 ‘‘(iv) The portion of 50 Payne Street. 

20 ‘‘(v) 726 Broadway.’’. 

Æ
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of PRIMEDIA Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew A. Flynn,Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Matthew A. Flynn                                         |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Matthew  A. Flynn                                             |
| Senior  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| November  9, 2004                                             |

 

 

This certificationaccompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

1

----
Case 2:11-cv-03511-WJM Document 3 Filed 06/29/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 292
Case 2:11-cv-03511-WJM Document 3 Filed 06/29/11 Page 2 of 6 PageID: 293
Case 2:11-cv-03511-WJM Document 3 Filed 06/29/11 Page 3 of 6 PageID: 294
Case 2:11-cv-03511-WJM Document 3 Filed 06/29/11 Page 4 of 6 PageID: 295
Case 2:11-cv-03511-WJM Document 3 Filed 06/29/11 Page 5 of 6 PageID: 296
Case 2:11-cv-03511-WJM Document 3 Filed 06/29/11 Page 6 of 6 PageID: 297
Exhibit 32.1

Statement Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, each undersigned officer of Archipelago Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to such officer's
knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

|Date: March 22, 2005 |  | /s/GERALD D. PUTNAMGerald D. Putnam Chief Executive
Officer
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 22, 2005 |  | /s/NELSON CHAINelson Chai Chief Financial Officer          

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
#### Juan Smith et al., Respondents, v Yonkers Contracting Company, Inc., Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 906]

The Supreme Court correctly granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1). The plaintiffs established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence sufficient to demonstrate that the defendant failed to provide adequate safety devices and that its violation of Labor Law § 240 (1) was a proximate cause of the injuries incurred *(see Felker v Corning Inc.,*90 NY2d 219, 224 [1997]; *Tylman v School Constr. Auth.,*3 AD3d 488, 489 [2004]; *Ramos v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.,*306 AD2d 147, 148 [2003]; *Nephew v*
      *858
      *Barcomb,*260 AD2d 821, 823 [1999]; *see also Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). In opposition, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d at 324; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Fisher, J.P., Miller, McCarthy and Chambers, JJ., concur.
ME1 13358934v.1 

John E. Flaherty

Partner 

T. 973.639.7903 

F. 973.297.3971 

jflaherty@mccarter.com 

McCarter & English, LLP 

Four Gateway Center 

100 Mulberry Street 

P.O. Box 652 

Newark, NJ 07102 

T. 973.622.4444 

F. 973.624.7070 

www.mccarter.com 

BOSTON

HARTFORD 

NEW YORK 

NEWARK 

PHILADELPHIA 

STAMFORD 

WILMINGTON 

May 1, 2012 

VIA ECF 

Hon. Tonianne J. Bongiovanni, U.S.M.J. 

U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey 

Clarkson S. Fisher Building & U.S. Courthouse 

402 East State Street 

Trenton, New Jersey 08608 

Re: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, et al. v. Mylan Inc. et al.

 Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-02506-JAP-TJB 

Dear Judge Bongiovanni: 

We represent plaintiffs in the above action. We write on behalf of all parties to 

request that the due date for the parties’ Markman responsive briefs be extended 

until June 22, 2012. The current due date for the parties’ Markman responsive 

briefs is May 23, 2012 (D.I. 49). 

If this extension meets with Your Honor’s approval, we respectfully request that 

Your Honor “so order” it and have it entered on the docket. 

 

Respectfully, 

s/John E. Flaherty

John E. Flaherty 

cc: Counsel of Record (via email) 

SO ORDERED on this ____ day of May, 2012: 

__________________________________ 

 Hon. Tonianne J. Bongovanni, U.S.M.J. 

Case 3:11-cv-02506-JAP-TJB Document 74 Filed 05/01/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1397
John E. Flaherty

Partner 

T. 973.639.7903 

F. 973.297.3971 

jflaherty@mccarter.com

McCarter & English, LLP 

Four Gateway Center 

100 Mulberry Street 

Newark, NJ 07102-4056 

T. 973.622.4444 

F. 973.624.7070 

www.mccarter.com 

BOSTON

HARTFORD 

NEW YORK 

NEWARK 

PHILADELPHIA 

STAMFORD 

WILMINGTON 

June 14, 2013 

VIA ECF 

Hon. Lois H. Goodman, U.S.M.J. 

U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey 

Clarkson S. Fisher Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse 

402 East State Street 

Trenton, New Jersey 08608 

Re: Orexo AB v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al., 

 Civil Action No. 11-3788 (FLW) (LHG) 

Dear Judge Goodman: 

Our firm, along with our co-counsel Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy 

LLP, represents Plaintiff Orexo AB in this action. We write regarding a proposed 

change to the briefing schedule for Mylan’s Motion for Leave to File Its First 

Amended Answer to Complaint, Separate Defenses, and Counterclaims (ECF No. 

130) (“Motion for Leave”), which was filed on June 7, 2013. 

Orexo contacted Defendants on Wednesday, June 12, 2013 to request 

Defendants’ consent to a one-week extension of the filing deadline for Orexo’s 

opposition brief (from June 17, 2013 to June 24, 2013). In response, Defendants 

requested an additional week to the time allotted to file their reply brief. Both 

parties consented to the requests. 

Accordingly, Orexo respectfully requests the Court’s approval of the 

following briefing schedule for Mylan’s Motion for Leave: 

• Orexo’s brief in opposition to the Motion for Leave (currently due 

Monday, June 17, 2013) will be due on Monday, June 24, 2013. 

• Mylan’s reply brief will be due on Monday, July 8, 2013. 

If the proposed schedule is acceptable to Your Honor, we respectfully 

request that you ‘so order’ this letter and have it entered on the docket. 

Respectfully submitted, 

s/John E. Flaherty 

John E. Flaherty SO ORDERED on this ____ day of June, 2013: 

cc: Counsel of Record 

 ______________________________________ 

 Hon. Lois H. Goodman, U.S.M.J. 

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW-LHG Document 134 Filed 06/14/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 3669
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan Lewis,
Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
      Jonathan LewisJonathan
      Lewis, Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)March
      23, 2009
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I,
Patrick P. Fourteau, the Chief Executive Officer and President of First Horizon Pharmaceutical Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

This
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|March 1, 2004 |  | By: |                                                                                            
|------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|              |  |     | /s/PATRICK P. FOURTEAUName: Patrick P. Fourteau
Title:Chief Executive Officer and President

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to First Horizon Pharmaceutical Corporation and will be retained by First Horizon
Pharmaceutical Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 136 (Friday, July 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17037]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Notice of Proposed Information Collection Request

AGENCY: Department of Education.

ACTION: Correction Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 9, 2009, the Department of Education published a 
comment period notice in the Federal Register (Page 32896, Column 3) 
for the information collection, ``Requests for Title I, Part A 
Waivers''. Written comments regarding the emergency review should be 
electronically mailed to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b1412091a24080e19161208081214153b141619551e140b551c140d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="224d4b50437d5157404f4b51514b4d4c624d4f400c474d520c454d54">[email protected]</span></a>. The IC Clearance 
Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of 
Management, hereby issues a correction notice as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

    Dated: July 13, 2009.
Angela C. Arrington,
IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, 
Office of Management.
[FR Doc. E9-17037 Filed 7-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
, 

v. Civil Action No. 3:ii-cv-03788 (FLW)(LHG)

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and,

MYLAN ThC,

Defendants,

EPROPOSED1 ORDER

This matter having come before the Court, it is hereby ordered that, absent extraordinary

circumstances, the parties will produce employee witnesses for deposition in NY. Mylan shall

produce Dr. Abhijit Deshmukh for deposition in New York on May 3, 2013. Mylan will

continue to report to the court on its efforts to secure visas and any other necessary

documentation for Balamurugan Jeganathan and Raveendra Pai (collectively, with Dr.Deshmukh, “Mylan’s Employee Witnesses”) so that they may appear for depositions in New

York before May 15, 2013,

L

Lk

It is further ordered that Mylan nthe gee4 ihefft4g to secure the deposition testimony

of its former employees Subash Chandra Mohanta and P. Murali Krishna

Orexos nomemplovee inventor, Christer NystrOrn. will testify voluntarily in New York on April

25, 2013.

The Court shall address the remainder of the schedule after Mylan resolves whether it is

able to produce th Mvlan Emp’oyee Vvitnesses in New Yoik before Ma 15, 2013 and the
April2O13

onLo’ H,Good an,U.S,MJ.

2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS

OFFICE: TRENTON DATE: June 11, 2015

JUDGE MARY L. COOPER 

COURT REPORTERS: Regina Tell and Carol Farrell

TITLE OF CASE: CV11-3962(MLC) 

HELSINN HEALTHCARE S.A. 

v.

DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. 

 

APPEARANCES:

Joseph O’Malley, Esq., Eric Dittman, Esq., Isaac Ashkenazi, Esq., and 

Charles Lizza, Esq., for plaintiffs

Gorge Lombardi, Esq., Jovial Wong, Esq., Mayra Tarantino, Esq., Julia Johnson, Esq.,

and Brendan Barker, Esq. for defendant TEVA

Stuart Sender, Esq., Michael Imbacuan, Esq., Howard Wang, Esq., Kenneth Crowell, Esq.

and Constance Huttner, Esq., for defendant DR. REDDY'S LAB

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:

Trial without jury continued before the Honorable Mary L. Cooper.

Carl Peck SWORN for plaintiffs.

Ordered trial adjourned until 6/12/15 at 9:30am.

Lunch recess: 11:45am – 12:30pm

TIME COMMENCED: 9:30am 

TIME ADJOURNED: 3:15pm 

TOTAL TIME: 5 hours 

s/Elizabeth Heffner

Deputy Clerk

Case 3:11-cv-03962-MLC-DEA Document 333 Filed 06/11/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 19890
P:\Linares\Lissette\Order-consent re schedule.wpd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
wae eee eee eee eee eee ee eee x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, :
-against- : 11-cr-00310 (JLL)
KOLE AKINOLA, : CONSENT ORDER REGARDING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Defendant. :
wee eee eee eee eee eee ee eee x

This matter having been opened on the motion of Defendant, Kole Akinola, and the
United States having consented, Joseph B. Shumofsky, A.U.S.A., and good cause having
been shown, it is on this 17" day of OCTOBER, 2011;

ORDERED that on or before October 20, 2011, Defendant may file a reply brief ,
limited to the issues presented by the motion to suppress (Docket Entry 16); it is further

ORDERED that the Court hereby establishes November 16, 2011, at 1:30 p.m., as the

return date for all pending motions. 7

JOSE L. LINARES, U.S.DJ.
Case 2:11-mj-09101-ARM Document 5 Filed 06/02/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Crim. No. 11-352 (FSH)

 

v. : O R D E R

FRANKLIN RAUL SALAZAR-MARTINEZ : 

Defendant. :

This matter having come before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge filed in this matter, which was submitted as a result of this Court having

referred this cause to the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of conducting a plea proceeding under

Fed. R. Crim. P. 11; and the defendant having consented to the Magistrate Judge conducting the

guilty plea proceeding; and the Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as

the transcript of the proceedings on November 22, 2011 and there being no objection to the Report

and Recommendation timely filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b); and the Court finding the Report

and Recommendation is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law; and the Court hereby finding

that the Report and Recommendation should be approved and adopted and the defendant’s guilty

plea accepted,

IT IS ON THIS 21 day of December, 2011, st

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is

approved and adopted; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant’s guilty plea is accepted and a judgment

of guilt to Count One of the Information shall be entered. 

 s/ Faith S. Hochberg 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Nag 4 No. ll-225 (DEfl)

ORDER FOR CONTThTUC

This matttc having come before the Court on the joint

application.of Paul

3 Fisb.man, United States Attorney for the

District of New Jey CR. Joeph Gribico, Assistant tLS.

Attorney, appearing and defendants avid Wax arzd Judy Wax

(Mitchell 3. Ansell, Esq, and Steven Secarer appearing),

for an order ranti

a doritinuance of the proceedings in the

above-captioned matr, and the defendants and their counsel

beiflg aware that ar tnformation or Indictnent ordinarily must be

filed within thirty (SO) days of defendant’s initial appearanceon this charge, pur.iant to Title l, United States Code, Section

31G1(b) 1and, pursu1t to Title 18,. United States Code, eltion

3161 (Ii) (‘7) (A), the iited States and the defendants having

requested this contiiuance so that the parties ca.n negotiate plea

agreements and thety avoid

a possible trial; and for good cause

shown;

IT

I on t(lis

— ( day of March, 2013,

ORDERED t:t the time from the date this Order is

entered, to and inuding May 23, 2013, shall be excluded in

calculating the titt within which an Information or Indictment

ir.

DAVID WAX and

Jt7TY WAX
jury proceedings and any ubsequeit trial ef this matter

unnecessary;

2. Puu.int to Title 18, United States Code, Sectiofl

3161 (h) (7) (h), the ds o justice served by grenting the

centinuance outweig) the best interest Of the public and the

defendants in a speLy triaL.

Nelson ST

Mitchell zel1, Esc

Cotuisel for e en anavid Wax

tevep 4ecare, q.

Coun4el for defendan Judy Wax

HON. DOUGLAS E • ARPRT

United 5tte Magistrate Judge

Office

-
time to discuss plea negotiations, which would render any grand

jury proceedings and any subsequent trial of this matter

unnecessary;

21 Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section

3161(h) (7) (A), the ends of justice served by granting the

continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendants in a speedy trial.

HON. DOUGLAS( E \kRPERT

United Statesistrate Judge

Nelsons.’r. Thayer, Jr.

At ey In arge ren n Office

ose Gibi

As ist it St es Attorney

Mitchell Ansell, Esq.

Counsel for Defendant David Wax

Steven Secare, Esq.

Counsel for defendant Judy Wax