1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

 .

: 

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF : 

PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES : 

DISTRICT COUNCIL 711 HEALTH & : 

WELFARE, VACATION AND : 

FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE : 

FUNDS, ET AL. : Civil Action No. 11-2948 (ES) (CLW) 

: 

Plaintiff, : OPINION & ORDER

: 

v. : 

: 

R&S PAINTING & DECORATING, INC. : 

: 

Defendant. : 

 : 

SALAS, DISTRICT JUDGE

 Pending before the Court is a motion for default judgment under Rule 55 of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure submitted by Trustee and Fiduciary, Harry J. Harchetts, on behalf of 

International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council 711 Health and Welfare, 

Vacation and Finishing Trades Institute Funds (“Plaintiffs”). (Docket Entry No., “D.E.” 6). 

Because Plaintiffs moved for default judgment before the Clerk’s entry of default, Plaintiffs’ 

motion is DENIED without prejudice with leave to re-file. 

An application for entry of default judgment must contain evidence, by affidavits and 

documents, of: “(1) the entry of default pursuant to Rule 55(a); (2) the absence of any 

appearance by any party to be defaulted; (3) that the defendant is neither an infant nor an 

incompetent; (4) that the defendant has been validly served with all pleadings; (5) the amount of 

judgment and how it was calculated; (6) and an affidavit of non-military service in compliance 

Case 2:11-cv-02948-ES-CLW Document 8 Filed 01/23/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 109
2 

with the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act.” Ciasulli v. Hartmann, No. 08-5544, 2009 WL 

150668, at *1 (D.N.J. Jan. 21, 2009) (quoting GE Healthcare Fin. Servs. v. New Brunswick XRay Grp., PA, No. 05-833, 2007 WL 38851, at *3 (D.N.J. Jan. 4, 2007)). 

Here, Plaintiffs’ motion fails on prong (1), because, at the time Plaintiffs filed their 

motion for default judgment, an entry of default had not yet been issued under Rule 55(a). On 

March 24, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a complaint against Defendant alleging claims under §§ 502 and 

515 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1145, as well as § 

301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. §185. (D.E. 1). The 

Defendant was served, but has failed to file an answer. On July 28, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a 

motion for default. (D.E. 6). However, it was not until July 29, 2011 that Plaintiffs requested 

and received the Clerk’s Entry of Default as to R&S Pleading & Decorating, Inc. (D.E. 7). 

Rule 55 sets forth the default procedure. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55. First, a party requests an 

entry of default, and the Clerk makes a judgment; however, the clerk’s entry of default alone 

does not entitle the party to relief. Second, following the Clerk’s entry of default, the party must 

submit a motion for default judgment to the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2). Where plaintiffs 

have failed to follow this procedure, courts have denied their motions for default judgment 

because an entry of default by the Clerk under Rule 55(a) constitutes a general prerequisite for a 

subsequent default judgment under Rule 55(b). See, e.g., Husain v. Casino Control Comm’n, 

265 F. App’x 130, 133 (3d Cir. 2008) (“Prior to obtaining a default judgment under either Rule 

55(b)(1) or Rule 55(b)(2), there must be an entry of default as provided by Rule 55(a).”); 

Limehouse v. Delaware, 144 F. App’x 921 (3d Cir. 2005) (denying plaintiff’s motion for default 

where plaintiff failed to request an entry of default prior to moving for default judgment); United 

States SBA v. Beals, No. 08-1954, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102141, at *11-12 (D.N.J. Dec. 16, 

Case 2:11-cv-02948-ES-CLW Document 8 Filed 01/23/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 110
3 

2008) (denying plaintiff’s motion for default where plaintiff failed to request an entry of default); 

United States SBA v. Hamaayan Fountain of Jewish Culture Inst., Inc., No. 08-1957, 2008 U.S. 

Dist. LEXIS 102095 (D.N.J. Dec. 16, 2008) (denying plaintiff’s motion for default judgment 

because plaintiff requested an entry of default the day after filing a motion to dismiss). Here, as 

in Husain, Limehouse, Beals, and Hamaayan Fountain, the Clerk had not entered default before 

Plaintiffs filed their motion for default judgment; therefore, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. 

IT IS THEREFORE on this 23rd day of January 2012, 

ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment, (D.E. 6), is DENIED pending 

receipt by this Court of a timely filed motion following the Clerk’s entry of default, in addition to 

compliance with all other requirements established by Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure. 

SO ORDERED. 

s/Esther Salas x 

Esther Salas, U.S.D.J.

Case 2:11-cv-02948-ES-CLW Document 8 Filed 01/23/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 111