alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Agency for International Development

          - 48 CFR Parts 704, 713, 714, 715, 744, and 752
          - RIN 0412-AA63

# AGENCY:

United States Agency for International Development.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document makes corrections to the preamble and clause of a proposed rule published in the                         **Federal Register**                         of June 26, 2009, regarding Partner Vetting in USAID Acquisitions. This correction corrects the fax number provided in the                         **ADDRESSES**                         section of the rule and a paragraph reference in the definitions section of clause 752.204-71.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jennifer Norling, 202-712-1807.

## Corrections

In proposed rule FR Doc. E9-15012, beginning on page 30494 in the issue of June 26, 2009, make the following corrections:

                        1. In the                         **ADDRESSES**                         section, on page 30494 in the 2nd column, correct the Fax number in the third bullet to read “                        *Fax:*                         202-216-3395”.                    

2. In line 2 of the 48 CFR 752.204-71(b) definition of “Vetting Official”, on page 30498 in the 2nd column, correct the paragraph reference to read “paragraph (d) of this clause”.

Dated: June 26, 2009.

Diane Howard,

Chief, Policy Division, Office of Acquisition and Assistance, U.S. Agency for International Development.

[FR Doc. E9-16227 Filed 7-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### Karen McCarthy, Respondent, v Thomas D. McCarthy, Appellant.

[854 NYS2d 456]

The parties’ judgment of divorce, which incorporated, but did not merge, a stipulation of settlement dated February 16, 2000, *697provided that the Supreme Court would retain jurisdiction of the matter concurrently with the Family Court for the purpose, inter alia, of making further determinations with respect to support, custody, or visitation. From the time that the judgment of divorce was entered, the Family Court, Suffolk County, has heard at least one petition to modify the visitation schedule with respect to the parties’ child, and has appointed a Law Guardian for the child. Both parties reside in Suffolk County, and the child’s therapist practices there.

The father nonetheless moved in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, inter alia, to transfer custody of the child from the mother to him. The mother cross-moved to change venue from Nassau County to Suffolk County and to refer the matter to the Family Court, Suffolk County *(see*CPLR 510 [3]; Family Ct Act § 651 [a]). The Supreme Court granted the cross motion and directed that the issues raised in the father’s motion be determined in Suffolk County. We affirm.

Inasmuch as the Family Court, Suffolk County, is familiar with the issues in the matter, the child and both of the parents reside in Suffolk County, and it appears that all of the material witnesses are in Suffolk County, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the mother’s cross motion *(see*CPLR 510 [3]; *cf. Matter of Arcuri v Osuna,*41 AD3d 841 [2007]). The father’s argument that the Supreme Court lacked the power to grant the motion is without merit *(see*Family Ct Act § 651 [a]). Fisher, J.P., Florio, Angiolillo, Dickerson and Belen, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50831

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESUS MANUEL SALAZAR-MONTES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-69-ALL-FM

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jesus Manuel

Salazar-Montes raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8

U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 134 (Wednesday, July 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16912]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Federal Register Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Dates: Weeks of July 13, 20, 27, August 3, 10, 17, 2009.

Place: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

Status: Public and Closed.

Week of July 13, 2009

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of July 13, 2009.

Week of July 20, 2009--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of July 20, 2009.

Week of July 27, 2009--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of July 27, 2009.

Week of August 3, 2009--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of August 3, 2009.

Week of August 10, 2009--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of August 10, 2009.

Week of August 17, 2009--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of August 17, 2009.
* * * * *
    * The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on 
short notice. To verify the status of meetings, call (recording)--(301) 
415-1292. Contact person for more information: Rochelle Bavol, (301) 
415-1651.
* * * * *
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policy-making/schedule.html.
* * * * *
    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation 
to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or 
the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another 
format (e.g. braille, large print), please notify the NRC's Disability 
Program Coordinator, Rohn Brown, at 301-492-2279, TDD: 301-415-2100, or 
by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6614090e084804140911082608140548010910"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fc8e939492d29e8e938b92bc928e9fd29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>. Determinations on requests for 
reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.
* * * * *
    This notice is distributed electronically to subscribers. If you no 
longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the 
distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, 
DC 20555 (301-415-1969), or send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f591948799909b90db82879c929d81b59b8796db929a83"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b4d0d5c6d8d1dad19ac3c6ddd3dcc0f4dac6d79ad3dbc2">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: July 9, 2009.
Rochelle C. Bavol,
Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-16912 Filed 7-13-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection  with the Quarterly  Report of W2 ENERGY, INC.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A, First Amended for the period
ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I, Michael McLaren, Principal Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March
      14,
      2008
            By:
            /s/ Michael
McLarenMichael McLarenPrincipal Financial
    Officer
#### Amos Diaz et al., Appellants, v Ryan Chrysler, Respondent.

[822 NYS2d 136]

*582In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered January 19, 2005, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action based on Labor Law § 241 (6) alleging a violation of 12 NYCRR 23-1.8 (a).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The injured plaintiff was hired to install a video system in a minivan, an activity that required only screwdrivers and a ratchet set. While attempting to snake wires under the minivan’s carpet, he was injured. The Supreme Court, inter alia, granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action based on Labor Law § 241 (6) alleging a violation of 12 NYCRR 23-1.8 (a). We affirm insofar as appealed from.

The activity in which the injured plaintiff was engaged when he was injured did not, as a matter of law, take place in the context of construction, as required for a claim under Labor Law § 241 (6) *(see Nagel v D & R Realty Corp.,*99 NY2d 98, 103 [2002]; *Rodriguez v 1-10 Indus. Assoc., LLC,*30 AD3d 576 [2006]; *Lioce v Theatre Row Studios,*7 AD3d 493 [2004]; *Sarigul v New York Tel. Co.,*4 AD3d 168, 170 [2004]; *Luthi v Long Is. Resource Corp.,*251 AD2d 554, 555-556 [1998]). Accordingly, summary judgment dismissing the cause of action based on Labor Law § 241 (6) alleging a violation of 12 NYCRR 23-1.8 (a) was properly granted. Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Covello, JJ., concur.
MICHAEL DURANTE : ORDER

A status conference having been held by the Court concerning the scheduled trial of this

matter, the parties having the opportunity to be heard, and for good and sufficient cause shown;

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that the action should be continued for the

following reasons:

1. This case has been deemed a “complex case” pursuant to Title 18, United States

Code, Section 3161 (h)(7)(B)(ii);

2. There has been extensive motion practice, pursuant to which the Court has

conducted an on-going evidentiary hearing, and a number of motions have yet to be fully briefed;

3. The Court is conducting an on-going evidentiary hearing which may require further

witness testimony prior to resolution, and the Defendant seeks the opportunity to file additionalmotions based on the outcome ofthat hearing;

4. In light of these findings, and given the nature ofthe case and its complexity, it is

unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings or the trial itself within thetime limits established under the Speedy Trial Act;

5. Defendant objects to a continuance ofthis matter;

6. Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161, the ends ofjustice served by

granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the Defendant in a speedy

trial;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period between April 30, 2012, until September 11,

2012, shall be excludable in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that trial in this matter shall commence September 11,

2012.

;—-—-.—-——... ,—

H9jAN’LLYR SLER

—nited States District Judge
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 135 (Thursday, July 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16848]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13483-000]


FFP Project 72, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application 
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and 
Competing Applications

July 9, 2009.
    On May 22, 2009, FFP Project 72, LLC filed an application for a 
preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, 
proposing to study the feasibility of the Miller Bend Hydrokinetic 
Project, to be located on the Mississippi River, in Chicot County, 
Arkansas and Washington County, Mississippi.
    The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant 
the permit holder priority to file a license application during the 
permit term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder 
to perform any land disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands 
or waters owned by others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed Miller Bend Hydrokinetic Project consists of: (1) 
2,724 proposed 40 kilowatt Free Flow generating units having a total 
installed capacity of 108.96 megawatts; (2) a 3.3-mile-long, 69 
kilovolt transmission line; and (3) appurtenant facilities. The 
proposed Miller Bend Hydrokinetic Project would have an average annual 
generation of 477 gigawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Ramya Swaminathan, Vice President of 
Development, Free Flow Power Corporation, 33 Commercial Street, 
Gloucester, MA 01930; phone: (978) 226-1531.
    FERC Contact: Kim Carter, 202-502-6486.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project, including a copy of 
the application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of 
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. 
Enter the docket number (P-13483) in the docket number field to access 
the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-16848 Filed 7-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0248

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

REGINA LEE THOMPSON,

 Defendant and Appellant,

 

 ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension 

of time, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an 

extension of time to and including July 1, 2022, within which to 

prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 20 2022

05/20/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0248
Design B: A Comprehensive 

Picture of Expenditures & Income

Workshop Discussion of NRC Report 

October 16, 2012
Design B schematic

1 
Potential strengths

 Large sample

 Detailed expenditure at the household 

level

 Only imputation from within HH diary data

 No split sample—all data from all HHs

 Panel data

 “Gold standard” supplement

2 
Potential weaknesses

 Loss of bounding information—are benefits 

of bounding worth the cost?

 Streamlining—will it mitigate response 

problems 

 Estimation—do individual HHs have to 

have records to “account” for spending 

rather than “recall” or “estimate” it?

 “Gold standard”—is there an operational 

gold standard?

3 
What design is optimal?

 CPI weights—which design has lowest MSE? 

 Design B has large effective sample size

 Evidence is that recall surveys have lower bias

 Research & other uses (e.g., poverty 

measurement, child support)

 Design B is the only design with true HH 

microdata (with panel)

 Supplemental panel is potential vehicle for 

future design improvements

4 
Data output

 Data produced by design B roughly 

comparable to current survey, but with 

less detail on recall survey

 No processing of base records, such as 

receipts

 Minimal imputation (within HH from diary 

component)

5
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document





































 



 
 

  Exhibit 10.9    
    


 
 

  TRUE RELIGION APPAREL, INC.
  
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPENSATION    
    


        The following table sets forth the Company's current compensation arrangements with its non-employee directors. 

 






			
	Annual Retainer:	 	$25,000 per calendar quarter ($100,000 annually)
	
Committee Chairs:	
 	
Board Lead Director—Annual Retainer of $100,000

Audit Committee—Annual Retainer of $15,000

Compensation Committee—Annual Retainer of $15,000
	
Special Committee Service:	
 	
$30,000 per month so long as the Company continues to pursue strategic alternatives.
	
Restricted Stock Grant:	
 	
Annual grant of restricted shares with an aggregate market value of $135,000 on the date of grant, to vest in three equal annual installments on the anniversary of the grant date.




 

 








QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.9


TRUE RELIGION APPAREL, INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPENSATION
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of POINTSTAR  ENTERTAINMENT  CORP. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  October 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Altaf Alimohamed,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Altaf Alimohamed
                                        --------------------------------
Date: November 29, 2006                 Altaf Alimohamed
                                        Chief Executive Officer
>



**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**









Keith
      Lowey, in the capacity of the officer who performs the functions of Principal
      Financial Officer, of Conihasset Capital Partners, Inc, a Delaware corporation
      (the “Registrant”), certifies that:




1.
      The
      Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007
      (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




Dated:
                     August 14, 2007
                /s/
                    Keith LoweyKeith
                    LoweyChief
                    Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hostopia.com Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Colin Campbell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (1350, as adopted pursuant to (906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 13, 2007 | /s/ COLIN CAMPBELL   |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------|

|   | Colin Campbell |
|--------|----------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

 

 

34

----
SUMMARY OF MATERIAL TERMS OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT FOR
                         PREMISES IN TEL AVIV, ISRAEL

o    The leased premises are at 34 Ha Barzel Street, Tel Aviv 69710 Israel.

o    The initial lease agreement was entered into on February 12, 1998 by and
     among ClickSoftware Technologies Ltd. and Aradin Ltd., Larga Ltd., T.N.R
     properties Ltd., Eligar Ltd., as lessors. The lease was amended three
     times thereafter.

o    The commencement date of the lease is June 1, 1998, and the lease expires
     on May 31, 2006. ClickSoftware has the option to extend the term of the
     lease by two periods of one year each.

o    The total area leased by ClickSoftware is 1843 square meters, of which
     350 square meters was subleased.

o    The average price per square meter per month is US$8.89 (payable in New
     Israeli Shekels) per square meter per month. The company also leases 60
     parking spaces for $90 per month. The current monthly lease is US$21,634.
     The lease amounts are paid in quarterly installments.

o    ClickSoftware has undertaken to compensate and indemnify the lessor in
     case of any damage or expense they might incur as a result of the lease.
     ClickSoftware is required to insure the leased premises.

o    ClickSoftware is required to submit the lessor a bank guarantee and
     promissory note against its obligations pursuant to the lease in the
     amount of $60,000. ClickSoftware is obligated to pay interest for fees
     not paid when due.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

JOHN KEYS,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 5 EM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4 th day of April , 2023, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief

is DENIED.