alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of theundersigned officers of Globalstar, Inc. (the “Company”), does herebycertify that:

 

This quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2009 of the Company fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q****fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  August 10, 2009 |   |                     |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                         |   |                     |
|                         |   |                     |
|                         | By:    | /s/  Peter J. Dalton     |
|                         |   | Peter  J. Dalton         |
|                         |   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|                         |   |                     |
| Dated:  August 10, 2009 |   |                     |
|                         |   |                     |
|                         | By:    | /s/  FUAD AHMAD          |
|                         |   | Fuad  Ahmad              |
|                         |   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

21. Persons at work in nonagricultural industries by class of worker and usual full- or part-time status

(Numbers in thousands)

Industry and class of worker

1999

Total

at

work

Worked 1 to 34 hours

Worked

35 hours

or more

Average hours

Total

For

economic

reasons

For noneconomic

reasons

Total

at

work

Persons who

usually work

full time

Usually

work

full

time

Usually

work

part

time

 Total 16 years and over .......................................................... 124,948 30,000 3,189 8,614 18,197 94,948 39.5 43.3

Wage and salary workers ......................................................... 116,602 27,370 2,852 8,073 16,444 89,232 39.5 43.1

 Mining ..................................................................................... 525 44 8 29 7 481 48.1 48.6

 Construction ........................................................................... 7,200 1,235 271 594 370 5,966 41.1 42.6

 Manufacturing ......................................................................... 19,081 2,167 265 1,209 694 16,914 42.7 43.6

 Durable goods ...................................................................... 11,703 1,212 123 755 334 10,491 43.1 43.8

 Nondurable goods ................................................................ 7,378 955 142 454 360 6,423 42.0 43.3

 Transportation and public utilities ........................................... 8,751 1,368 158 616 594 7,383 42.5 44.3

 Wholesale and retail trade ...................................................... 25,086 8,145 935 1,192 6,018 16,941 37.2 43.4

 Finance, insurance, and real estate ....................................... 7,887 1,469 79 632 758 6,418 40.3 42.5

 Service industries ................................................................... 42,345 11,913 1,099 3,096 7,718 30,432 38.1 42.7

 Private households ............................................................... 897 516 71 47 398 381 28.7 41.8

 All other industries ................................................................ 41,447 11,397 1,028 3,049 7,319 30,051 38.3 42.7

 Public administration .............................................................. 5,727 1,029 37 706 287 4,698 40.7 41.9

Self-employed workers ............................................................. 8,252 2,577 334 536 1,707 5,675 40.1 46.7

Unpaid family workers .............................................................. 95 54 3 5 46 41 33.4 45.7

 NOTE: Beginning in January 1999, data reflect revised population controls used in the household survey.

197
HOUSEHOLD DATA HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES ANNUAL AVERAGES

35. Persons not in the labor force by desire and availability for work, age, and sex

(In thousands)

Category

Total Age Sex

2008 2009

16 to 24

years

25 to 54

years

55 years

and over Men Women

2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009

Total not in the labor force .................................... 79,501 81,659 15,452 16,207 21,255 21,823 42,794 43,629 30,593 32,013 48,908 49,646

 Do not want a job now 1 ..................................... 74,519 75,765 13,719 14,263 19,087 19,199 41,712 42,303 28,365 29,234 46,154 46,531

 Want a job 1 ........................................................ 4,983 5,894 1,733 1,944 2,168 2,624 1,082 1,325 2,228 2,779 2,755 3,115

 Did not search for work in previous year .......... 2,826 3,075 913 960 1,145 1,241 768 874 1,187 1,344 1,639 1,731

 Searched for work in previous year 2 ............... 2,157 2,818 819 983 1,023 1,383 314 452 1,041 1,435 1,115 1,384

 Not available to work now ............................... 543 592 252 275 244 256 48 61 214 251 329 341

 Available to work now ..................................... 1,614 2,226 568 708 780 1,127 266 391 827 1,184 787 1,043

 Reason not currently looking:

 Discouragement over job prospects 3 ........ 462 778 145 200 226 427 90 151 282 485 180 293

 Reasons other than discouragement .......... 1,152 1,449 422 509 554 699 176 240 545 699 607 749

 Family responsibilities .............................. 171 209 35 38 111 131 25 41 45 50 126 159

 In school or training .................................. 218 306 173 234 42 65 3 7 108 163 109 144

 Ill health or disability ................................. 124 136 16 19 68 68 40 49 55 70 69 66

 Other 4 ...................................................... 640 798 199 219 332 435 108 144 337 417 303 381

1 Includes some persons who are not asked if they want a job. 2 Persons who had a job in the prior 12 months must have searched

since the end of that job. 3 Includes believes no work available, could not find work, lacks

necessary schooling or training, employer thinks too young or old, and

other types of discrimination.

4 Includes those who did not actively look for work in the prior 4 weeks

for such reasons as child care and transportation problems, as well as a

small number for which reason for nonparticipation was not ascertained.

 NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the

release of January data.

242
Case 3:11-cv-00745-PGS-DEA   Document 145   Filed 08/14/12   Page 1 of 3 PageID: 4670

Case 3:11-cv-00745-PGS-DEA   Document 145   Filed 08/14/12   Page 2 of 3 PageID: 4671

Case 3:11-cv-00745-PGS-DEA   Document 145   Filed 08/14/12   Page 3 of 3 PageID: 4672
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Grace 4, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Virginia K. Sourlis,
Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




Dated:  October
13, 2009





GRACE
      4, INC.By:
                  /s/
      VIRGINIA K. SOURLISVirginia
      K. SourlisPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)(Principal
      Financial
Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Cancellation of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App 1, 10), notice is hereby given that the July 21, 2009, meeting of the Big Cypress National Preserve ORV Advisory Committee previously announced in the                         **Federal Register**                        , Vol. 73, November 17, 2008, p. 67882, is cancelled.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Pedro Ramos, Superintendent, Big Cypress National Preserve, 33100 Tamiami Trail East, Ochopee, Florida 34141-1000; 239-695-1103.                              ( print page 34777)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Committee was established (                    **Federal Register**                    , Vol. 72, August 1, 2007, pp. 42108-42109) pursuant to the Preserve's 2000                     *Recreational Off-Road Vehicle Management Plan*                     and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C. Appendix) to examine issues and make recommendations regarding the management of off-road vehicles (ORVs) in the Preserve. The agendas for these meetings are published by press release and on the                     *http://parkplanning.nps.gov/​projectHome.cfm?​parkId=​352&​projectId=​20437*                     Web site. The meetings are open to the public, and time is reserved for public comment. Oral comments are summarized for the record. If individuals wish to have their comments recorded verbatim, they must submit them in writing.                

Dated: July 6, 2009.

Pedro Ramos,

Superintendent, Big Cypress National Preserve.

[FR Doc. E9-17098 Filed 7-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-V6-P
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5180 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5180

  To extend the authority of the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act of 
                     1999 through October 22, 2005.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2004

Mr. Peterson of Minnesota (for himself and Mr. Boswell) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the authority of the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act of 
                     1999 through October 22, 2005.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE LIVESTOCK MANDATORY REPORTING ACT OF 1999 
              THROUGH OCTOBER 22, 2005.

    Section 942 of the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act of 1999 (7 
U.S.C. 1635 note) is amended by striking ``5 years'' and inserting ``6 
years''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:11-cr-00473-JLL Document 8 Filed 04/17/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 30
Case 2:11-cr-00473-JLL Document 8 Filed 04/17/12 Page 2 of 6 PageID: 31
Case 2:11-cr-00473-JLL Document 8 Filed 04/17/12 Page 3 of 6 PageID: 32
Case 2:11-cr-00473-JLL Document 8 Filed 04/17/12 Page 4 of 6 PageID: 33
Case 2:11-cr-00473-JLL Document 8 Filed 04/17/12 Page 5 of 6 PageID: 34
Case 2:11-cr-00473-JLL Document 8 Filed 04/17/12 Page 6 of 6 PageID: 35
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Airspan Networks, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, :Peter Aronstam, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/    PETER
ARONSTAM                                
|-----------------------------------------------------
|Peter Aronstam Chief Financial Officer March 28,
2003



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Airspan Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Airspan Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 136 (Friday, July 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17058]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; Behavioral AIDS.
    Date: July 22, 2009.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Enid Light, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental 
Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 
6132, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20852-9608, 301-443-0322, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c5a0a9aca2adb185a8a4aca9ebabacadeba2aab3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c5a0a9aca2adb185a8a4aca9ebabacadeba2aab3">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

    Dated: July 13, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-17058 Filed 7-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### HEINER v. NORTH AMERICAN COAL CORPORATION et al.

No. 1756.

District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

Nov. 14, 1942.

.James I. Marsh and Samuel Kaufman, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay and Thomas W. Pomeroy, Jr., all of Pittsburgh, Pa,, for defendants.

GIBSON, District Judge.

The complainant has moved the court for an order upon the Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Company “to produce and permit the inspection and copying or photographing * * * of certain minute books and applications filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission and Reconstruction Finance Corporation already produced in response to subpoena and other records and documents hereafter to be produced inj response to subpjoena * * *»

The application is made pursuant to Rule 34, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. That rule is more rigid than the rules relating to depositions and interrogatories. To entitle complainant to the order prayed he must show good cause for the order, must designate the documents desired, and must show that they are not privileged and are material to any matter involved in the action.

The complainant’s motion does not meet the requirements of the rule and will be denied, without prejudice to the right of complainant to renew his motion in proper form.

Order.

And now, to wit, November 14, 1942, the motion of complainant for an order upon the Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Company to produce documents and papers-for inspection and copying is hereby denied, without prejudice to his right to renew his motion in the form required by Rule 34 of the Rules of Federal Procedure.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Crim. No. 11-352-03 (FSH)

 

v. : O R D E R

JAISON MARTINEZ : 

Defendant. :

This matter having come before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge filed in this matter, which was submitted as a result of this Court having

referred this cause to the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of conducting a plea proceeding under

Fed. R. Crim. P. 11; and the defendant having consented to the Magistrate Judge conducting the

guilty plea proceeding; and the Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as

the transcript of the proceedings on January 18, 2012, and there being no objection to the Report and

Recommendation timely filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b); and the Court finding the Report and

Recommendation is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law; and the Court hereby finding that

the Report and Recommendation should be approved and adopted and the defendant’s guilty plea

accepted,

IT IS ON THIS 8 day of February, 2012, th

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is

approved and adopted; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant’s guilty plea is accepted and a judgment

of guilt to Count One of the Indictment shall be entered. 

 s/ Faith S. Hochberg 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                               MEGAPRO TOOLS, INC.


         Pursuant to Section 78.385 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Megapro Tools, Inc., a corporation
organized and existing under and by virtue of the law of the State of Nevada
(the "Corporation"), does hereby certify:

         That pursuant to a Written Consent of the Board of Directors dated
October 1, 2002, and a Written Consent of stockholders holding at least a
majority of the voting power of the Company dated October 2, 2002, the Board of
Directors and stockholders approved the amendment to the Corporation's Articles
of Incorporation as follows:

         FIRST: Article I of the Articles of Incorporation of this Corporation
is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

         "The name of this Corporation shall be Spear & Jackson, Inc."

         SECOND: The foregoing amendment was adopted by a Written Consent of the
Board of Directors dated October 1, 2002, pursuant to Section 78.315(2) of the
Nevada Revised Statutes, and Written Consent of stockholders holding at least a
majority of the voting power of the Corporation dated October 2, 2002, pursuant
to Section 78.320(2) of the Nevada Revised Statutes. The number of votes cast
for the amendment to the Corporation's Articles of Incorporation were sufficient
for approval.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer
of this Corporation, has executed this Certificate of Amendment as of November
7, 2002.

                                            MEGAPRO TOOLS, INC.


                                        /s/ Dennis Crowley
                                            -------------------
                                            Dennis Crowley
                                            Chief Executive Officer
#### Shenel Clark Breland, Appellant, v Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[854 NYS2d 209]

On October 21, 2002 James Breland (hereinafter the decedent) was taken by ambulance to the emergency room of the defendant Jamaica Hospital Medical Center (hereinafter the Hospital), complaining of a severe headache, dizziness, and blurred vision. The decedent, who suffered a brain hemorrhage, died two days later.

The plaintiff, the administratrix of the decedent’s estate, commenced the instant action against the Hospital and another defendant. The plaintiff asserted causes of action to recover damages for medical malpractice and wrongful death alleging, inter alia, that the Hospital’s staff delayed the decedent’s treatment in certain respects, and that such delays constituted departures *790from good and accepted medical practice. The Hospital subsequently moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. The Supreme Court granted that motion and entered judgment in favor of the Hospital. We reverse.

On its motion, the Hospital established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). The Hospital provided an affidavit of an expert neurosurgeon, who, upon reviewing the decedent’s medical records and the deposition testimony, opined to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that the delays in treatment did not constitute departures from good and accepted medical practice, and moreover, were not proximate causes of the decedent’s death *(see Rebozo v Wilen,*41 AD3d 457, 458 [2007]; *Thompson v Orner,*36 AD3d 791, 792 [2007]; *Williams v Sahay,*12 AD3d 366, 368 [2004]).

In opposing the motion, the plaintiff provided an affidavit from an expert neurologist, who, upon reviewing the decedent’s medical records and the deposition testimony, opined to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that the delays in treatment constituted departures from good and accepted medical practice, and were proximate causes of the decedent’s death. Contrary to the conclusion of the Supreme Court, the plaintiff’s expert’s knowledge of the relevant standards of care was established *(see Erbstein v Savasatit,*274 AD2d 445, 445-446 [2000]). Furthermore, the affidavit of the plaintiff’s expert was sufficient to raise triable issues of fact as to whether the Hospital’s staff departed from good and accepted medical practice in its treatment of the decedent, and whether such departure was a proximate cause of the decedent’s death *(see Vera v Soohoo,*41 AD3d 586, 587 [2007]; *Rebozo v Wilen,*41 AD3d at 458; *Thompson v Orner,*36 AD3d at 792; *Dellacona v Dorf,*5 AD3d 625 [2004]; *Domaradzki v Glen Cove Ob/Gyn Assoc.,*242 AD2d 282 [1997]; *Sisko v New York Hosp.,*231 AD2d 420, 422 [1996]). Miller, J.P., Covello, Eng and Chambers, JJ., concur.