alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.11


 Exhibit 10.11 
 HANCOCK HOLDING COMPANY 
 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

 Amendment 
 (Tax Withholding) 
 Whereas, Hancock Holding Company (the
“Company”) maintains the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, which plan was most recently amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2008 (the “Plan”); 

Whereas, the Board of Directors of the Company now desires to amend the Plan to provide for an exemption under Rule 16b-3
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with respect to certain withholding transactions related to shares of the Company’s $3.33 par value common stock paid or distributed from the Plan; 

Now, Therefore, the Plan shall be amended as follows, such amendment to be effective as set forth herein: 

Tax Withholding: 

Effective with respect to distributions or payments made from the Plan as of October 1, 2009, or thereafter, section 15.1(c) of the
Plan shall be amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: 
  

	 	“c.	Distributions. The Employer shall withhold from any payment made to a Participant hereunder, as a condition thereof, the amount of any federal, state and local
income, employment or other tax required by law to be withheld. To the extent a Participant may direct, he or she may satisfy this obligation, in whole or in part, by directing the Employer to withhold from any payment or distribution hereunder
shares of Common Stock having a Fair Market Value equal to the amount required to be withheld, provided that (i) such amount shall be determined for Federal income tax purposes at a rate not in excess of the aggregate rates applicable to
supplemental wage payments and employment taxes, to the extent withholding is required with respect thereto, (ii) such withholding shall not exceed the amount of such tax, determined at the rates provided herein, attributable to Common Stock
paid or distributed hereunder, and (iii) Fair Market Value shall be determined as of the date on which such shares are otherwise subject to payment or distribution hereunder.” 


This Amendment was approved by the Board of Directors on September 10, 2009, to be effective as set
forth above, and was executed by an authorized officer of the Company on this 10th day of September, 2009. 
  

					
	Hancock Holding Company
		
	By:	 	 
		 	        Its:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 13

- 00581

- CV

In the INTEREST OF J.R.L. III , a Child

From the 83rd Judicial District Court

, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 29690

Honorable Robert Cadena, Judge Pres iding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 18, 2013

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(a)(1). Because the motion does not disclose an agreement of the parties regarding the

assessment of costs, we order costs of the appeal assessed against appellan t. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(d) (absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
##### 



Exhibit 13.1 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to section 906 if the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Crayfish Co., Ltd., a
Japanese company (the Company), hereby certifies, that: The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  April 12, 2005
    By:

/s/ Masaaki ShimamuraMasaaki ShimamuraChief Executive Officer, President
andRepresentative Director
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CAMDEN VICINAGE

CITY SELECT AUTO SALES, INC., a )

New Jersey corporation, individually and )

as the representative of a class of similarly )

situated persons, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) No.: 1:11-cv-02658-JBS -KMW

v. )

)

DAVID RANDALL ASSOCIATES, INC. )

and RAYMOND MILEY III, )

)

Defendants. )

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the Notice of Motion for Pro Hac Vice

Admission of Jonathan B. Piper, Certification of Alan C. Milstein, Affidavit of

Jonathan B. Piper, proposed form of Order and Certificate of Service were filed with

the Court Clerk, United States District Court, and served upon all counsel via the

Court’s ECF filing system

Sherman, Silverstein, Kohl,

Rose, and Podolsky

S/ALAN C. MILSTEIN

Alan C. Milstein

308 Harper Dr., Ste. 200

Moorestown, NJ 08057

Telephone: 856-662-0700

Jonathan B. Piper

Bock & Hatch, LLC

134 N. La Salle St., Ste. 1000

Chicago, IL 60603

Dated: Telephone: 312-658-5500 January 10, 2013

Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 54-4 Filed 01/10/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1484
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10487

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LUIS RIVERA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:15-CR-51-1

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Luis Rivera has moved for leave to 

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Rivera has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow

us to make a fair evaluation of Rivera’s claim of ineffective assistance of 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-10487 Document: 00513804370 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
No. 16-10487

2

counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to 

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Rivera’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-10487 Document: 00513804370 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00381-CR

Joshua Allen SCHOPPMAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR0692

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED July 22, 2015.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Barbara Lampley v. D’Nisha Sterling

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00 549

- CV

Trial court case number: 18

- DCV

- 248776

Trial court: 4 00 th District Court of Fort Bend County



### The clerk’s record was filed September 7, 2022

. A reporter’s record was filed on September 16, 2022 from a hearing conducted on June 29, 2021

. On October 7, 2022

, appellant filed a motion to abate the appeal, contending that she requested reporter’s records from various hearings, but th at transcripts from these hearings have not bee n made a part of the appellate record. Appellee did not respond to the motion. Accordingly, we issue the following order:

The judge of the 400th District Court is ordered to conduct a hearing at which the
court reporter s , Mindy Hall and Stephanie A. Webb , appellant’s counsel and appellee’s counsel shall participate (a) to determine whether the appellate record is complete, (b) to
determine the reason for failure to file the reporter’s record s , if any ; ( c ) to establish a date

certain when any additional re porter’s record will be filed, and ( d ) to make whatever additional findings and orders to ensure that the appellate record is timely filed. The trial court shall forward to this court a supplemental clerk’s record containing its relevant findings and orde rs. The hearing record and supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of this court within 30 days of the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be r einstated on this Court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal on its own motion. If the court reporter files the

record (s) p rior to the date set for the hearing, the appeal will be reinstated and the trial court need not hold a hearing.

. It is so ORDERED

.Judge’s signature:

___ /s/ Sherry Radack

_____  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___ October 27, 2022

___
EXHIBIT 23.2





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS







We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-113054, 333-143029, 333-151943 and 333-168964 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 15, 2012, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (which report expressed an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding conditions and events that cast substantial doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern) and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2011.





/s/ Deloitte LLP


Independent Registered Chartered Accountants


Calgary, Canada


March 27, 2013
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Grace 4, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for three month period ended August 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Virginia K.
      Sourlis, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
      and belief:





1.    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated: October
                7, 2008
            
            /s/ Virginia K. SourlisVirginia K. Sourlis
              Chief
                Executive Officer and
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              (Principal Executive Officer)
              (Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION****OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the yearly report of China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank Waung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18        U.S.C. Sec.1350 as adopted pursuant section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:                 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.                 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Pharma Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by China Pharma Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|  |   |   | Date: June 24, 2009                              |   |   |
|--|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|  |        |        |                                             |        |        |
|  |   |   | By: /s/ Frank Waung                              |   |   |
|  |   |   |        Frank Waung |   |   |
|  |   |   | Chief Financial Officer                     |
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David A. Finke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ David A. FinkeDavid A. Finke,Chief Financial OfficerDated:May 16, 2011
NOT FOR PUBLICATION CLOSED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

LORI BIANCO,

 Plaintiff,

v.

ELMWOOD PARK POLICE

DEPARTMENT,

 Defendant.

Civil Action No.: 11-2402 (JLL)

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court by way of a Complaint submitted by Plaintiff

on April 27, 2011; and it appearing that Plaintiff has not prepaid the $350 filing fee; and it

appearing that while Plaintiff has submitted a non-prisoner application to proceed in forma

pauperis, such application is incomplete, as Plaintiff has failed to make entries in numerous

fields, including fields in Questions 3 and 4; and it further appearing that Plaintiff has filed six

other Complaints with this Court that appear to be factually related to the instant Complaint, see

Civil Action Nos. 11-1986, 11-2400, 11-2401, 11-2403, 11-2404, 11-2500;

IT IS on this 27th day of June, 2011,

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; and it is

further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively terminate this case, without

filing the complaint or assessing a filing fee. Plaintiff may seek to have this case reopened by

either filing a complete in forma pauperis application or paying the $350 filing fee. Plaintiff is

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:11-cv-02402-JLL-CCC Document 4 Filed 06/27/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 17
further encouraged to consider filing her related claims as a single civil action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Jose L. Linares 

JOSE L. LINARES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 2 of 2

Case 2:11-cv-02402-JLL-CCC Document 4 Filed 06/27/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 18
#### The Western Union Telegraph Company *v.*Davis.

Simmons, C. J. — The only question being whether or not the telegraph-company exercised proper diligence in attempting to deliver the message, and the evidence being sufficient to authorize the jury to find that it did not, the verdict for the plaintiff below will not be-disturbed.

November 12,1894.

Action for penalty. Before Judge Westmoreland. City court of Atlanta. May term, 1894.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*521The plaintiff", between seven and eight o’clock in the evening of September 13,1891, within usual office hours,, delivered to defendant’s agent at Hapeville a message addressed to Lillian Hendricks, 38 Terry street, Atlanta. That was her place of residence, and had been so for over a month. It was within a mile of defendant’s office. The message was given to Boon, one of the defendant’s messengers, to be delivered that night. He looked in the city directory for 38 Terry street, but could not find it; he found the numbers 37 and 39,and thought 38 ought to be near them. He then went to the street and looked for the place. As it was dark he could not see the number. He went to 37 and inquired for Lillian Hendricks, and where number 38 was, but got no information ; then went to 39 with like result. He crossed the street and made inquiry at a house the occupants of which said they did not know. He then gave up the search. He did not go to the next house, which was the one he afterwards found to be 38. The next morning he made search for 38 in daylight, and could not find it. Some days afterwards, on complaint of failure to deliver the message, another of defendant’s messengers went to the street and looked for number 38, but could not find it. He looked on the left side of the street, going south. Being asked, on cross-examination, if he found 37 and 39, he answered that he was not looking for them but for 38. There was some testimony that the number 38 was on the house, and had been there for about a month before the message was sent; and there was testimony, on the other hand, that the number was put there after the complaint of failure to deliver.

Dorsey, Brewster & Howell and Bisby, Reed & Berry, for plaintiff" in error. J. B. Stewart, *contra.*
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cal Dive International, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Quinn J. Hébert, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and G. Kregg Lunsford, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:   August 1, 2008







| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| | /s/ Quinn J. Hébert                  
| | Quinn J. Hébert                      
| | President and
Chief Executive Officer







| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ G. Kregg Lunsford                               
| | G. Kregg Lunsford                                   
| | Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

____________________________________

:

:

ASTRAZENECA AB, et al. :

:

:

Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No. 11-760 (JAP)

:

v. :

: ORDER

HANMI USA, INC., et al. :

:

:

: 

Defendants. :

____________________________________:

Presently before the Court are motions by Hanmi seeking (1) summary judgment of noninfringement of claims 1-11, 13-18 and 20-23 of the ‘192 patent, and (2) summary judgment of 

non-infringement on claims 3, 5 and 8-10 of the ‘504 patent. For the reasons in the 

accompanying Opinion,

IT IS on this 29th day of June 2012

ORDERED that Hanmi’s motion (designated by the parties as Motion No. 1) [#97]

seeking summary judgment of non-infringement of claims 1-11, 13-18 and 20-23 of the ‘192 

patent is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that the part of Hanmi’s motion (designated by the parties as Motion No. 5) 

[#104] seeking summary judgment of non-infringement on claims 8 and 9 of the ‘504 patent is 

DENIED without prejudice, and that part of Hanmi’s Motion No. 5 for summary judgment of 

non-infringement of claims 3, 5 and 10 of the ‘504 patent is DENIED as moot.

/s/ Joel A. Pisano

JOEL A. PISANO, U.S.D.J.

Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB Document 227 Filed 06/29/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 8674
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of EGPI Firecreek, Inc. (the "Registrant")
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Dennis R. Alexander,
      President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that, to the best of


our
      knowledge and belief:





(1)
        The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
        The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
      the
      Registrant.





By:
            /s/
                Dennis R. AlexanderDennis
                R. Alexander
              President
                and Chief Financial Officer




Date:
      July 24, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by
      the
      Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.





*****