alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5029 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5029

 To allow a waiver or exemption of certain requirements for restricted 
                  airspace if security is not reduced.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 8, 2004

Mr. LaTourette (for himself and Mr. Kucinich) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow a waiver or exemption of certain requirements for restricted 
                  airspace if security is not reduced.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AIR SHOW EXEMPTION IN CERTAIN CASES.

    Section 521(a)(2) of the Transportation, Treasury, and Independent 
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2004 (Public Law 108-199, div. F) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (B)(v);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (C) 
        and inserting the following: ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) to allow the operations of an aircraft 
                participating in an air show in restricted airspace if 
                the Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
                Administration determines that the security of an 
                event, stadium, or other venue is not reduced.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 132 (Monday, July 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16551]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (09-065)]


Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a meeting of the Review of U.S. Human Space 
Flight Plans Committee. The agenda topics for the meeting include:
    <bullet> Marshall Space Flight Center Perspective.
    <bullet> Constellation projects.
    <bullet> Committee subgroup reports.
    <bullet> Public comment.

DATES: Wednesday, July 29, 2009, 8 a.m.-4 p.m. Note: All times listed 
are local times.

ADDRESSES: The Davidson Center for Space Exploration, The U.S. Space & 
Rocket Center, One Tranquility Base, Huntsville, AL 35805, 256-837-
3400.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Philip R. McAlister, Office of 
Program Analysis and Evaluation, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Washington, DC 20546. Phone 202-358-0712.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. It is imperative that the meeting be 
held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key 
participants.

P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
 [FR Doc. E9-16551 Filed 7-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5133 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5133

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 11110 Sunset Hills Road in Reston, Virginia, as the ``Martha Pennino 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 23, 2004

  Mr. Moran of Virginia (for himself, Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia, Mr. 
Cantor, Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia, Mr. Forbes, Mr. Goode, Mr. Wolf, 
 Mr. Boucher, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. Goodlatte, and Mr. 
   Schrock) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 11110 Sunset Hills Road in Reston, Virginia, as the ``Martha Pennino 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARTHA PENNINO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 11110 Sunset Hills Road in Reston, Virginia, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Martha Pennino Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Martha 
Pennino Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
Case 3:11-cv-03243-AET-TJB   Document 2   Filed 06/10/11   Page 1 of 5 PageID: 12

Case 3:11-cv-03243-AET-TJB   Document 2   Filed 06/10/11   Page 2 of 5 PageID: 13

Case 3:11-cv-03243-AET-TJB   Document 2   Filed 06/10/11   Page 3 of 5 PageID: 14

Case 3:11-cv-03243-AET-TJB   Document 2   Filed 06/10/11   Page 4 of 5 PageID: 15

Case 3:11-cv-03243-AET-TJB   Document 2   Filed 06/10/11   Page 5 of 5 PageID: 16
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the "Company") for the period
ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Wayne Pastore, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



Date:
March 10, 2011

/s/ WAYNE PASTOREWayne PastoreSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks
ME1 13789154v.1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL 

TO: THE CLERK OF COURT AND ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Dillon Kim withdraws as attorney of record for Plaintiffs 

and Counterclaim-Defendants Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda 

Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals LLC, Takeda Pharmaceuticals 

America, Inc., and Ethypharm, S.A. (collectively, "Plaintiffs"). Attorneys from Hogan Lovells 

US LLP, Hogan Lovells Horitsu Jimusho, and McCarter & English, LLP will continue to 

represent Plaintiffs in this case. Attorneys from Baker Botts LLP will continue to represent 

Ethypharm, S.A. in this case. 

Dated: July 13, 2012 s/John E. Flaherty 

John E. Flaherty 

McCarter & English, LLP 

Four Gateway Center 

100 Mulberry Street 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

T (973) 622-4444 

F (973) 624-7070 

TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL 

COMPANY LIMITED, TAKEDA 

PHARMACEUTICALS NORTH AMERICA, 

INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS 

LLC, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS 

AMERICA, INC., and ETHYPHARM, S.A., 

Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants, 

 

v. 

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., 

Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-02506-JAP-TJB 

 

Case 3:11-cv-02506-JAP-TJB Document 86 Filed 07/13/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1824
2 

ME1 13789154v.1 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on July 13, 2012, I caused a copy of the foregoing NOTICE OF 

WITHDRAWAL to be served upon all counsel of record by operation of the Court’s electronic 

filing system. 

 s/ John E. Flaherty 

 John E. Flaherty 

Case 3:11-cv-02506-JAP-TJB Document 86 Filed 07/13/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1825
EX-10.101



 Exhibit 10.101 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER SIX TO THE 
 METLIFE AUXILIARY PENSION PLAN 

(As amended and restated effective January 1, 2008) 
 The MetLife Auxiliary Pension Plan is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2012, as follows: 
  

	1.	Part I Article 1 is hereby amended to read as follows: 

 “The purpose of the Plan is to provide to certain participants employed by the Company, and other employers (each an “Employer”) participating under the Metropolitan Life Retirement Plan
for United States Employees (“Retirement Plan”) and his/her beneficiaries, the excess amount that would have been payable under the Retirement Plan in the absence of the limitations under (i) section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986 (as amended) (“Internal Revenue Code”), (ii) section 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code, or such lesser limit as in effect under the Retirement Plan and (iii) or (iii) section 1.415(c)-2(c) of the Income Tax
Regulations “Regulation(s)”, that excludes compensation deferred under the Company’s or an Employer’s deferred compensation arrangements. 
 Except for terms defined in this Plan, all capitalized terms used in this Plan shall have the same definition and meaning assigned to those terms under the Retirement Plan.” 

 

	2.	Part I, Article 2, Section 2.1, subsection (b) is hereby amended to read as follows: 


 

	“(b)	whose Retirement Plan benefits are reduced because of the application of section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code, including Regulation section 1.415(c)-2(c).”


  

	3.	Part I, Article 4, Section 4.2, subsection (a) subpart (iii) is hereby amended to read as follows: 


“(iii) Regulation section 1.415(c)-2(c) (with respect to deferred compensation arrangements); and,” 

 

	4.	Part I, Article 7, is hereby amended to read as follows: 

 “The Company shall have the ability to withhold any tax amounts (whether income, employment, estate or other tax) it determines, in its discretion, is due and owing from the Participant to the
Company, whether the tax obligation arose on account of the benefit under this Plan or arose due to other wages or amounts payable by the Company to the Participant. If, however, tax is determined, in the discretion of the Company and in accordance
with any process the Plan Administrator approves for the determination and collection of taxes, to be due and owing from the Participant, at a time other than when amounts are due to be paid from this Plan, then the Company will have the discretion
to reduce the accrued benefit or account balance of the Participant in this Plan by the amount of any tax that it determines is due and owing.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be adopted in its name and behalf this 20th day of December, 2012, by its officer thereunto duly authorized. 

 

									
				
	METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,	 	 	 	By: 	 	/s/ Andrew Bernstein
		 		 		 	Andrew Bernstein, Plan Administrator
	ATTEST: 	 	 /s/ Anne Browne
	 		 		 	


  
 1
#### In the Matter of S & S Pub, Inc., Doing Business as Dublin Pub, Appellant, v New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

[852 NYS2d 804]

Upon judicial review of a determination rendered by an administrative body following a hearing, this Court’s function is limited to consideration of whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence *(see Matter of Lahey v Kelly,*71 NY2d 135, 140 [1987]; *Matter of Alegre Deli v New York State Liq. Auth.,*298 AD2d 581, 582 [2002]). The term “substantial evidence” has been held to be a “minimal standard” *(Matter of FMC Corp. [Peroxygen Chems. Div.] v Unmack,*92 NY2d 179, 188 [1998]; *Matter of Café La China Corp. v New York State Liq. Auth.,*43 AD3d 280 [2007]). Hearsay evidence is admissible in administrative proceedings, and may, if sufficiently relevant and probative, constitute substantial evidence *(see People ex rel. Vega v Smith,*66 NY2d 130, 139 [1985]; *Matter of Abdelrahman*
      *655
      *v New York State Liq. Auth.,*209 AD2d 405, 406 [1994]). Moreover, under appropriate circumstances, hearsay evidence may form the sole basis for an agency’s ultimate determination *(see Matter of Gray v Adduci,*73 NY2d 741, 742-743 [1988]; *Matter of Ridge, Inc. v New York State Liq. Auth.,*257 AD2d 625, 626 [1999]; *Matter of A. J. & Taylor Rest, v New York State Liq. Auth.,*214 AD2d 727 [1995]).

The determination of the respondent New York State Liquor Authority sustaining charges that the petitioner violated Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 (1), which prohibits the sale of alcoholic beverages to persons under the age of 21, is supported by substantial evidence *(see Matter of294 Grand Ave. Grocery Corp. v New York State Liq. Auth.,*12 AD3d 521 [2004]; *Matter of Oneonta Water St. v New York State Liq. Auth.,*279 AD2d 849, 850 [2001]; *Matter of Sue’s Rendezvous of Westchester v New York State Liq. Auth.,*177 AD2d 273; *cf. Matter of Vitagliano v State of N.Y. Liq. Auth.,*174 AD2d 624 [1991]).

Additionally, the penalty imposed is not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness *(see Matter of Cantina El Bukis Corp. v New York State Liq. Auth.,*46 AD3d 557, 558 [2007]; *Matter of Oneonta Water St. v New York State Liq. Auth.,*279 AD2d at 851; *Matter of Ira Wyman, Inc. v New York State Liq. Auth.,*170 AD2d 991 [1991]). Rivera, J.P., Skelos, Santucci and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
013:7AUL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0162

IN MATTER OF:

J.D.D., A.J.D., and M.T.D.,

Youths in Need of Care.

FILED

JUN 2 6 2020

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Couri

State of Montana

ORDER

Upon consideration of Counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel of record,

and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Appellant in this matter shall file a

response to this motion within thirty (30) days ofthe date ofthis Order. The response

must be served upon all counsel of record, including the Attorney General, the

County Attorney, and the Appellate Defender's Office.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give notice of this

Order by mail to all counsel of record and to the Appellant at her last known

address.

DATED thisgyk day of June, 2020.

r\

06/26/2020
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document





































 



 
 

  EXHIBIT 10.11    
    


 
    Summary of Jeffrey R. Blom 2013 Compensation    
    


        The Knoll, Inc. compensation committee approved an annual base salary of $265,000 for Jeffrey R. Blom, with a bonus
target of $265,000. Mr. Blom is also entitled to participate in the benefit plans provided by Knoll that are generally available to Knoll employees. 











QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.11


Summary of Jeffrey R. Blom 2013 Compensation
# 013:7 AUL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No.DA 20-0162 IN MATTER OF: J.D.D.,A.J.D.,and M.T.D., Youths in Need ofCare. 

# FILED JUN 26 2020 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Couri State of Montana ORDER Upon consideration of Counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Appellant in this matter shall file a response to this motion within thirty (30) days ofthe date ofthis Order. The response must be served upon all counsel of record, including the Attorney General, the County Attorney,and the Appellate Defender's Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk ofthis Court give notice ofthis Order by mail to all counsel ofrecord and to the Appellant at her last known address. DATED thisgyk day ofJune, 2020.

r\ 06/26/2020
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Drew Bonnell, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Coronado Corp. for
      the period ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Coronado Corp.                                                                

Dated: August 16, 2010

| | /s/
      Drew Bonnell                                     
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | Drew Bonnell                                               
| | Secretary, Treasurer and CFO                               
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting
| | Officer)                                                   
| | Coronado Corp.                                             

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Coronado Corp.
and will be retained by Coronado Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICERANDCHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Chris Cooper, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Explortex Energy Inc., (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
      Company for the three months ended July 31, 2006 (the Quarterly Report)
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Quarterly
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.                                                                                   

| | By:    |                                  
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| |        | /S/ Chris Cooper                 
| | Name:  | Chris Cooper                     
| |        |                                  
| | Title: | Chief Executive
      Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial
      Officer    
| |        |                                  
| | Date:  | September 12,
      2006         

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying  Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Grace 2,
Inc. (the  "Company") for the quarter  ending  February 28, 2007, I, Virginia K.
Sourlis,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company
hereby  certify  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

      1. Such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ending  February
28, 2007,  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information  contained in such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ending February 28, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 21, 2007
Grace 2, Inc.
By: /s/ Virginia K. Sourlis
    -----------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 134 (Wednesday, July 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16724]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13478-000]


FFP Project 68, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application 
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and 
Competing Applications

July 8, 2009.
    On May 22, 2009, FFP Project 68, LLC filed an application for a 
preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, 
proposing to study the feasibility of the Davis Island Bend 
Hydrokinetic Project, to be located on the Mississippi River, in Tensas 
Parish, Louisiana and Warren County, Mississippi.
    The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant 
the permit holder priority to file a license application during the 
permit term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder 
to perform any land disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands 
or waters owned by others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed Davis Island Bend Hydrokinetic Project consists of: 
(1) 3,675 proposed 40 kilowatt Free Flow generating units having a 
total installed capacity of 147 megawatts; (2) a 4.8-mile-long, 69 
kilovolt transmission line; and (3) appurtenant facilities. The 
proposed Davis Island Bend Hydrokinetic Project would have an average 
annual generation of 644 gigawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Ramya Swaminathan, Vice President of 
Development, Free Flow Power Corporation, 33 Commercial Street, 
Gloucester, MA 01930; phone: (978) 226-1531.
    FERC Contact: Kim Carter, (202) 502-6486.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project, including a copy of 
the application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of 
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. 
Enter the docket number (P-13478) in the docket number field to access 
the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-16724 Filed 7-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P