alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

# Time and Date:

 August 6, 2009, 12 noon to 3 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time. 

# Place:

 This meeting will take place telephonically. Any interested person may call Mr. Avelino Gutierrez at (505) 827-4565 to receive the toll free number and pass code needed to participate in these meetings by telephone.

# Status:

 Open to the public.

# Matters to be Considered:

 The Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors (the Board) will continue its work in developing and implementing the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement and to that end, may consider matters properly before the Board.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Avelino Gutierrez, Chair, Unified Carrier Registration Board of Directors at (505) 827-4565.

Issued on: July 9, 2009.

Larry W. Minor,

Associate Administrator for Policy and Program Development.

[FR Doc. E9-16902 Filed 7-13-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Abram Janz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Blugrass Energy Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Blugrass Energy Inc.




By:
/s/ Abram JanzName:
Abram JanzTitle:
President and Chief Executive Officer


May 16, 2011














I, Laurence K. Maguire, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Blugrass Energy Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Blugrass Energy Inc.




By:
/s/ Laurence K. MaguireName:
Laurence K. MaguireTitle:
Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)


May 16, 2011
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Curtis James LAY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-7392.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 13, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 18, 2012.

Curtis James Lay, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Slaymaker Sale, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Curtis James Lay appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Lay,*No. 8:97-cr-00313-PJM-1 (D. Md. July 30, 2012; Dec. 4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal *231contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 21.1

OMNIVISION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.        Subsidiaries of OmniVision Technologies, Inc.

Registrant's significant consolidated subsidiaries and the state or jurisdiction of organization of each subsidiary are shown below:

Name of Subsidiary

Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

Percentage
OwnershipOmniVision International Holding Ltd.

Cayman Islands


100
%OmniVision Technology International Ltd., (formerly Hua Wei Technology International, Ltd.)

Cayman Islands


100
%OmniVision Technologies (Hong Kong) Company Limited

Hong Kong, China


100
%OmniVision Trading (Hong Kong) Company Limited

Hong Kong, China


100
%OmniVision Semiconductor (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. (formerly Hua Wei Semiconductor (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.)

China


100
%OmniVision Technologies (Shanghai) Co. Ltd., (formerly Shanghai OmniVision IC Design Co., Ltd.)

China


100
%Taiwan OmniVision Technologies Co., Ltd.

Taiwan


100
%Taiwan OmniVision International Technologies, Co., Ltd.

Taiwan


100
%Taiwan OmniVision Investment Holding Co., Ltd.

Taiwan


100
%OmniVision Holding (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd.

Hong Kong, China


100
%OmniVision Investment Holding (BVI) Ltd.

British Virgin Islands


100
%Shanghai OmniVision Semiconductor Technology Co. Ltd.

China


100
%Silicon Optronics, Inc.

Taiwan


44
%


---



QuickLinks
NO. 07-10-00142-CV 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AT AMARILLO 

PANEL D 

APRIL 23, 2010 

KYLE DEAN MERCHANT, 

 Appellant 

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

 

 Appellee 

_____________________________ 

FROM THE 12TH DISTRICT COURT OF WALKER COUNTY; 

NO. 21,760; HONORABLE DONALD KRAEMER, PRESIDING 

On Motion to Dismiss 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

 Appellant Kyle Dean Merchant has filed a pro se motion to dismiss his appeal 

because he no longer desires to prosecute it. Without passing on the merits of the 

case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no 

motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. 

 

Per Curiam 
2
Exhibit 32.2

              Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                      of Title 18 of the United States Code

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of NTR Acquisition Co. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, William E. Hantke,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ WILLIAM E. HANTKE
-----------------------------------
William E. Hantke
Principal Financial Officer
May 18, 2007

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to NTR Acquisition Co. and will be
retained by NTR Acquisition Co. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
---

Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Defentect Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the
undersigned’s knowledge, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: 
      May 19, 2010
              By:
              /s/ John T. GrippoJohn
      T. Grippo, Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coastal Media Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jan Aaron
Sigurgeirson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopteD pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
10th day of May, 2006.


/s/ Jan Aaron Sigurgeirson
---------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Exh 4.2 Trasfer Restrictions on Stock 2012 S-3






Exhibit 4.2
STATEMENT REGARDING RESTRICTIONS ON 
TRANSFERABILITY OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK 
(To Appear On Stock Certificate Or To Be Sent 
To Stockholders Issued Shares Without Certificates) 


The shares represented by this certificate are subject to restrictions on Beneficial Ownership, Constructive Ownership and Transfer for the purpose of the Corporation's maintenance of its status as a Real Estate Investment Trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).  Subject to certain further restrictions and except as expressly provided in the Corporation's charter:  (a) no Person may Beneficially Own or Constructively Own shares of the Corporation's Common Stock in excess of 9.8% (in value or number of shares) of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Corporation unless such Person is an Excepted Holder (in which case the Excepted Holder Limit for such Excepted Holder shall be applicable); (b) no Person may Beneficially Own or Constructively Own shares of Capital Stock of the Corporation in excess of 9.8% of the value of the total outstanding shares of Capital Stock of the Corporation, unless such Person is an Excepted Holder (in which case the Excepted Holder Limit for such Excepted Holder shall be applicable); (c) no Person may Beneficially Own or Constructively Own Capital Stock that would result in the Corporation being “closely held” under Section 856(h) of the Code or otherwise cause the Corporation to fail to qualify as a REIT; and (d) other than as provided in the Corporation's charter, no Person may Transfer shares of Capital Stock if such Transfer would result in the Capital Stock of the Corporation being owned by fewer than 100 Persons.  Any Person who Beneficially Owns or Constructively Owns or attempts to Beneficially Own or Constructively Own shares of Capital Stock which causes or will cause a Person to Beneficially Own or Constructively Own shares of Capital Stock in excess or in violation of the above limitations must immediately notify the Corporation.  If any of the restrictions on Transfer or ownership are violated, the shares of Capital Stock represented hereby will be automatically transferred to a Trustee of a Trust for the benefit of one or more Charitable Beneficiaries.  In addition, upon the occurrence of certain events, attempted Transfers in violation of the restrictions described above may be void ab initio.  


All capitalized terms in this legend have the meanings defined in the charter of the Corporation, as the same may be amended from time to time, a copy of which, including the restrictions on Transfer and ownership, will be furnished to each holder of Capital Stock of the Corporation on request and without charge.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Resolve Staffing, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10-KSB  for the period ending December 31, 2002, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of  the  Company,  certifies,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 3(a) or 15(d) of
     the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                         /s/ Wanda Dearth
                         ______________________________________
                         By:  Wanda Dearth
                         Chief Executive Officer
                         June 3, 2003

                         /s/ Cristino L. Perez
                         ______________________________________
                         By:  Cristino L. Perez
                         Chief Financial Officer
                         June 3, 2003















<PAGE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7711

GREGORY R. JOHNSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS CORCORAN, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District

Judge. (CA-96-1710-H)

Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: January 6, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory R. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Gwynn X. Kinsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Johnson v. Corcoran, No. CA-96-1710-H (D.

Md. Sept. 19, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4924 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4924

 To designate the United States courthouse at 300 North Hogan Street, 
Jacksonville, Florida, as the ``John Milton Bryan Simpson United States 
                             Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2004

Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida (for herself and Mr. Crenshaw) introduced 
      the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the United States courthouse at 300 North Hogan Street, 
Jacksonville, Florida, as the ``John Milton Bryan Simpson United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse at 300 North Hogan Street, 
Jacksonville, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``John 
Milton Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John Milton 
Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

13-1438

BRAINTREE LABORATORIES, INC., 

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NOVEL LABORATORIES, INC., 

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in case no. 11-CV-1341 United 

States District Judge Peter G. Sheridan

MANDATE

 In accordance with the judgment of this Court, entered April 22, 2014, and pursuant to Rule 41(a) of 

the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the formal mandate is hereby issued.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole 

Clerk of Court

Case 3:11-cv-01341-PGS-LHG Document 399 Filed 08/11/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 28758 Case: 13-1438 Document: 86 Page: 1 Filed: 08/11/2014
#### 220 West 93rd St., LLC, Respondent, v Rena Stavrolakes, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 44]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered April 7, 2006, after a nonjury trial, declaring that defendant violated her obligations as a rent-controlled tenant and terminating her tenancy, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The judgment was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence and should not be disturbed *(Saperstein v Lewenberg,*11 AD3d 289 [2004]). Sufficient evidence, in the form of testimony and numerous exhibits, was presented for the court to find that the occupancy of this three-bedroom apartment (with dining room converted to a fourth bedroom) by numerous persons between 2001 and 2005—especially short-term transient students at illegal rents—was in the nature of subletting rather than taking in roommates, and constituted profiteering and commercialization of the premises, an incurable violation of the rent control laws *(see BLF Realty Holding Corp. v Kasher,*299 AD2d 87 [2002], *lv dismissed*100 NY2d 535 [2003]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Buckley, EJ., Tom, Saxe, Sullivan and McGuire, JJ.
EXHIBIT 10.5

                                     [LOGO]

May 4, 2005

To: JRT Associates

From: Paul S. Lipschutz


      RE: Consulting Agreement

This letter is an addendum to our agreement dated October 10, 2004.

Collectible  Concepts  Group,  Inc.  hereby  agrees that because of the services
provided by Mr.  Theismann in attaining  the NFL license for CCGI,  we will also
pay 5% (five percent) of sales (as defined by the previous  agreement and on the
terms of the previous  agreement) for Major League Baseball (upon  completion of
license) sales made by CCGI.

Additionally,  we will issue options for an additional 3 million  shares at .003
(3 mills) good for 3 years from the date of this addendum.

/s/ Paul S. Lipschutz
----------------------
President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

BARBARA FISHER,

 Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER

OF SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION,

 Defendant.

HON. JEROME B. SIMANDLE

Civil No. 11-01634 (JBS)

ORDER

This matter came before the Court upon review of the final

decision of the Defendant, Commissioner of the Social Security

Administration, denying the application of Plaintiff, Barbara

Fisher, for Supplemental Security Income and Disability Benefits;

and the Court finding that the Commissioner’s decision should be

vacated and remanded for reasons stated in the Opinion of today’s

date; 

IT IS on this 21st day of March, 2012, hereby 

ORDERED and that the Commissioner’s decision is VACATED and

REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the instructions

set forth in today’s Opinion.

 s/ Jerome B. Simandle 

JEROME B. SIMANDLE

Chief United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01634-JBS Document 12 Filed 03/21/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 733
|  | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q      for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      August 9, 2010 | By:   | /s/ Barry      D. Zyskind                                                                    |
|---------------------------|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |            | Barry      D. ZyskindPresident      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer) |

----
EX-10.21



 Exhibit 10.21 
 SCHEDULE OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 
 For 2012, Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.
paid each non-employee member of our Board of Directors a $20,000 annual retainer, $5,000 for each regularly scheduled quarterly meeting of the Board of Directors attended by the member and $5,000 per board or committee meeting attended other than
regularly scheduled quarterly meetings. The Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an additional $5,000 annual retainer. Additionally, upon the date of election or re-election as a member of our Board of Directors, each non-employee director is
awarded 1,500 restricted shares of our common stock, which vest approximately 12 months from the date of grant. We review our compensation arrangement for directors from time to time.