alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Name of Subsidiary                               | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Formation |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Dagang Resources Ltd.                            | British Virgin Islands                     |
| IELA Colombia Inc.                               | Barbados                                   |
| IELA Mexico Pte. Ltd.                            | Singapore                                  |
| IELA Singapore Pte. Ltd                          | Singapore                                  |
| Ivanhoe Energy (Latin America) Inc.              | British Virgin Islands                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy (Middle East) Inc.                | British Virgin Islands                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy Advisory Inc.                     | British Virgin Islands                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy Canada Inc.                       | Alberta                                    |
| Ivanhoe Energy Canadian Holdings Inc.            | Alberta                                    |
| Ivanhoe Energy Colombia Inc.                     | Barbados                                   |
| Ivanhoe Energy Ecuador Inc.                      | British Columbia                           |
| Ivanhoe Energy Holdings Inc.                     | Nevada                                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy HTL (USA) Inc.                    | Nevada                                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy HTL Inc.                          | Nevada                                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy International Inc.                | British Virgin Islands                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy International Ventures Inc.       | British Virgin Islands                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy Latin America Inc.                | British Columbia                           |
| Ivanhoe Energy MENA Inc.                         | British Columbia                           |
| Ivanhoe Energy Mexico IELA, S.A. de C.V.         | Mexico                                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy Mexico Inc.                       | British Columbia                           |
| Ivanhoe Energy Mongolia Inc.                     | Alberta                                    |
| Ivanhoe Energy Petroleum Projects Inc.           | Nevada                                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy Services Mexico IELA S.A. de C.V. | Mexico                                     |
| Ivanhoe HTL Petroleum Ltd                        | Nevada                                     |
| Panasian Energy Ltd.                             | Nevis                                      |
| Shaman LLC                                       | Mongolia                                   |
| Sunwing Energy Ltd.                              | Bermuda                                    |
| Sunwing Holding Corporation                      | Barbados                                   |
| Sunwing Management Limited                       | Hong Kong                                  |
| Sunwing Zitong Energy Ltd.                       | British Virgin Islands                     |

----
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 28, 2015

NO. 03

- 14

- 00468

- CR

Mitchell Hollis Wright, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURL AND MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment adjudicating guilt entered by the tr i a l court. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, t he Court ho lds that there was no error in the

court’s judgment requiring reversal

. However, there was error in the judgment that requires

correction. Therefore, the Court mo difies the trial court’s judgment to reflect that the “Statute

for Offense” is “31.03(a), (e)(4)(A) Penal Code

. ” The judgment, as modified, is affirmed

.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Splinternet Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of the undersigned’s knowledge, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      May 14, 2009
              By:
              /s/ James C. AckerlyJames
      C. Ackerly, Chief Executive Officerand
      President (Principal Executive
Officer)
HOUSEHOLD DATA HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES ANNUAL AVERAGES

21. Persons at work in nonagricultural industries by class of worker and usual full- or part-time status

(Numbers in thousands)

Industry and class of worker

2010

Total

at

work

Worked 1 to 34 hours

Worked

35 hours

or more

Average hours

Total

For

economic

reasons

For noneconomic

reasons

Total

at

work

Persons who

usually work

full time

Usually

work

full

time

Usually

work

part

time

 Total, 16 years and over ......................................................... 131,891 34,505 8,744 7,850 17,911 97,386 38.1 42.2

Wage and salary workers ......................................................... 123,546 31,112 7,666 7,278 16,168 92,434 38.3 42.1

 Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction ......................... 682 49 9 31 9 632 49.4 49.9

 Construction ........................................................................... 7,148 1,534 787 439 308 5,614 39.1 41.1

 Manufacturing ......................................................................... 13,459 1,623 459 698 466 11,835 41.8 42.9

 Durable goods ...................................................................... 8,417 949 249 438 262 7,468 42.0 42.9

 Nondurable goods ................................................................ 5,041 674 210 260 204 4,367 41.5 42.8

 Wholesale and retail trade ...................................................... 18,234 5,626 1,573 779 3,274 12,608 36.9 42.3

 Transportation and utilities ..................................................... 6,524 1,123 324 379 420 5,401 41.3 43.5

 Information .............................................................................. 2,935 589 116 170 303 2,346 39.5 42.7

 Financial activities .................................................................. 8,469 1,448 212 568 667 7,021 40.1 42.2

 Professional and business services ....................................... 12,907 2,645 728 770 1,146 10,262 39.6 42.5

 Education and health services ................................................ 29,283 8,254 1,318 2,023 4,912 21,030 37.1 41.3

 Leisure and hospitality ............................................................ 11,579 5,240 1,572 450 3,218 6,339 33.2 41.5

 Other services ........................................................................ 5,574 1,827 446 253 1,128 3,747 36.2 42.4

 Other services, except private households ........................... 4,930 1,446 324 220 902 3,483 37.3 42.6

 Private households ............................................................... 644 381 122 33 226 264 28.0 39.4

 Public administration .............................................................. 6,752 1,154 121 718 315 5,598 40.4 41.6

Self-employed workers ............................................................. 8,261 3,347 1,069 566 1,713 4,914 35.6 42.9

Unpaid family workers .............................................................. 84 45 9 6 30 39 33.3 42.4

 NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

37
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

27. Unemployed persons by reason for unemployment, sex, and age

(Numbers in thousands)

Reason

Total,

16 years

and over

Men,

20 years

and over

Women,

20 years

and over

Both sexes,

16 to 19

years

2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006

NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYED

 Total unemployed .................................................................. 7,591 7,001 3,392 3,131 3,013 2,751 1,186 1,119

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs .......... 3,667 3,321 2,095 1,927 1,417 1,249 155 145

 On temporary layoff ................................................................ 933 921 557 540 317 324 59 57

 Not on temporary layoff .......................................................... 2,734 2,400 1,538 1,387 1,100 925 96 88

 Permanent job losers ............................................................ 1,955 1,686 1,068 948 831 685 56 53

 Persons who completed temporary jobs .............................. 779 714 470 439 269 240 40 35

Job leavers ............................................................................... 872 827 405 368 391 380 76 78

Reentrants ................................................................................ 2,386 2,237 793 757 1,103 1,019 489 461

New entrants ............................................................................ 666 616 99 78 101 103 466 435

PERCENT DISTRIBUTION

 Total unemployed .................................................................. 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs .......... 48.3 47.4 61.8 61.6 47.0 45.4 13.1 13.0

 On temporary layoff ............................................................... 12.3 13.2 16.4 17.3 10.5 11.8 5.0 5.1

 Not on temporary layoff ......................................................... 36.0 34.3 45.3 44.3 36.5 33.6 8.1 7.9

Job leavers ............................................................................... 11.5 11.8 11.9 11.7 13.0 13.8 6.4 7.0

Reentrants ................................................................................ 31.4 32.0 23.4 24.2 36.6 37.0 41.3 41.2

New entrants ............................................................................ 8.8 8.8 2.9 2.5 3.3 3.7 39.3 38.9

UNEMPLOYED AS A PERCENT OF THE

 CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs .......... 2.5 2.2 2.7 2.5 2.2 1.9 2.2 2.0

Job leavers ............................................................................... .6 .5 .5 .5 .6 .6 1.1 1.1

Reentrants ................................................................................ 1.6 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.7 1.5 6.8 6.3

New entrants ............................................................................ .4 .4 .1 .1 .2 .2 6.5 6.0

 NOTE: Beginning in January 2006, data reflect revised population controls used in the household survey.

251
1 The HONORABLE STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-3033

___________ Terry Allen Norton, et al., * * Plaintiffs - Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Bob Holden, Governor of the State of * Missouri, et al., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Defendants - Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 30, 2002 Filed: November 4, 2002

___________ Before LOKEN, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Terry Norton and four other Missouri inmates and non-inmate taxpayers appeal the district court’s 1 dismissal of their constitutional and statutory claims challenging the administration of the Missouri Sexual Offenders Program and the Missouri Drug Treatment Programs for rehabilitating Missouri inmates. The district court dismissed the federal civil rights act claims and the state pendent claims without prejudice, and the Federal qui tamclaims with prejudice. Upon careful review of the record, we-2- affirm for the reasons stated in the court’s June 28, 2002 Order and Memorandum. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). Judge Bye dissents from the dismissal of the Federal qui tam claims. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

 

CREATIVE MONTESSORI 

LEARNING CENTER,

Plaintiff,

v.

ASHFORD GEAR, LLC, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 09 CV 3963

Judge Robert W. Gettleman

 

 

PLAINTIFF’S STATUS REPORT RE: CLASS NOTICE 

 

Plaintiff Creative Montessori Learning Center on its own behalf and on 

behalf of the certified class of similarly situated individuals, by class counsel, 

pursuant to the court’s November 6, 2012 order (Doc. # 253), reports as follows

regarding the status of class notice:

1. Commencing on November 9, 2012, class counsel caused the class 

notice (Exhibit A) to be sent by fax to the 14,574 facsimile numbers (Exhibit B) to 

which the Defendant’s advertisement, which is the subject of the lawsuit, was sent.

2. Of the 14,574 facsimile numbers, the fax transmission was successful 

to 11,192 numbers, a success rate of over 76 per cent. The fax record is attached as 

Exhibit C.

3. There were 3,382 fax numbers for which the fax transmission, after 

three attempts, still was not successful. The notice was sent by U. S. Mail, 

Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 98-3 Filed 01/10/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 3666 Case: 1:09-cv-03963 Document #: 255 Filed: 11/20/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:10508
commencing on November 12, 2012, to the last known address corresponding to 

each of those numbers.

4. As a result, the class notice has now been sent with respect to each of 

the 14,574 facsimile numbers for the class, either by successful facsimile 

transmission or by U. S. Mail.

Respectfully submitted,

By: s/ Jonathan B. Piper

One of Plaintiff’s Attorneys

Brian J. Wanca

Ryan M. Kelly

ANDERSON & WANCA

3701 Algonquin Road, Suite 760

Rolling Meadows, IL 60008

Telephone: 847-368-1500

Phillip A. Bock

Robert M. Hatch

Jonathan B. Piper

Tod A. Lewis

BOCK & HATCH, LLC

134 N. La Salle St., Suite 1000

Chicago, IL 60602

Telephone: 312-658-5500

Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 98-3 Filed 01/10/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 3667 Case: 1:09-cv-03963 Document #: 255 Filed: 11/20/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:10509
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                          [DYNEGY HOLDINGS LETTERHEAD]

March 21, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

By letter dated March 20, 2002, addressed to Dynegy Holdings Inc., our
independent public accountants, Arthur Andersen LLP, pursuant to the
requirements of Securities and Exchange Commission Release Nos. 33-8070 and
34-45590, represented that their audit of Dynegy Holdings Inc. was subject to
Arthur Andersen's quality control systems for U.S. accounting and auditing
practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in
compliance with professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity
of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability of national
office consultation to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

Sincerely,

/s/ J. Kevin Blodgett

J. Kevin Blodgett, Assistant Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5157 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5157

 To amend the Public Health Service Act to expand the risk pools that 
                   qualify for high risk pool grants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2004

  Mr. Nethercutt (for himself and Ms. Dunn) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Public Health Service Act to expand the risk pools that 
                   qualify for high risk pool grants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``High Risk Pool Flexibility Act of 
2004''.

SEC. 2. REVISION OF DEFINITION OF QUALIFIED HIGH RISK POOL.

    Section 2745(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-
45(d)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(d) Definitions.--For purposes of this section:
            ``(1) Qualified high risk pool.--The term `qualified high 
        risk pool' has the meaning given such term in section 
        2744(c)(2), except that a State may elect to meet the 
        requirement of subparagraph (A) of such section (insofar as it 
        requires the provision of coverage to all eligible individuals) 
        through providing for the enrollment of eligible individuals 
        through an acceptable alternative mechanism (as defined for 
        purposes of section 2744) that includes a high risk pool as a 
        component.
            ``(2) State.--The term `State' means any of the 50 States 
        and the District of Columbia.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**I, Michael L. Chasen, Chief Executive Officer of Blackboard Inc. (the “Company”), do herebycertify, under the standards set forth in and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:1.     The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the“Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 as amended; and2.     The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated:February 19, 2008                                              /s/ Michael L. Chasen   Michael L. Chasen                                    Chief Executive Officer   
 

 
**EXHIBIT 32.2****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**I, Michael J. Beach, Chief Financial Officer of Blackboard Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify,under the standards set forth in and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:1.     The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the“Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 as amended; and2.     The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated:February 19, 2008                                              /s/ Michael J. Beach   Michael J. Beach                                    Chief Financial Officer
EX-10.21.1



 Exhibit 10.21.1 
 December 19, 2008 
 Darryl McDonald 
 Teradata Corporation 
 Dear Darryl: 
 This letter amends the letter agreement between you and Teradata Corporation (“Teradata”) dated September 20, 2007 (the “Agreement”) and shall be effective as of December 31,
2008. As we have discussed, the amendment set forth below is necessary in order for the Agreement to comply with the new tax rules imposed under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). 

 

	1.	The section of the Agreement entitled “Arbitration” is amended by adding the following at the end of the sixth sentence thereof:


 “at any time from the Start Date through your remaining lifetime (or, if longer, through the 20th
anniversary of the Start Date). To the extent that the reimbursement for reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses and arbitration expenses is considered “deferred compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, then
the reimbursement must be paid as soon as reasonably practicable after, but in any event not later than the end of the calendar year in which, you are declared the prevailing party. The amount of such attorneys’ fees and expenses and
arbitration expenses that Teradata is obligated to pay in any given calendar year shall not affect the attorneys’ fees and expenses and arbitration expenses that Teradata is obligated to pay in any other calendar year, and your right to have
Teradata pay such attorneys’ fees and expenses and arbitration expenses may not be liquidated or exchanged for any other benefit.” 
  

	2.	Except as explicitly set forth herein, the Agreement will remain in full force and effect. 

 Please indicate your acceptance of the amendment to the Agreement by signing below and returning a copy to me. 
 Sincerely, 
  

			
	TERADATA CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Molly A. Treese
		 	Molly A. Treese
		 	Chief Corporate & Governance Counsel and Assistant Secretary

  

					
	Agreed and Accepted:	 		 	
			
	/s/ Darryl D. McDonald	 		 	1/5/09
	Darryl McDonald	 		 	Date
2012 Exhibit 10.43.2






Exhibit 10.43.2


FIRST AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This First Amendment (the “Amendment”) to that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement made and entered into as of December 31, 2008 by and between Sprint Nextel Corporation and CHARLES R. WUNSCH (the “Agreement”) is entered into on this 12th day of December, 2012. Certain capitalized terms shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement as provided herein.


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the covenants and agreements set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Executive hereby amend the Agreement as follows:


		
	1.
	Effective as of November 6, 2012, Section 11(b) of the Agreement is replaced in its entirety by the following:


    
(b)     A “Competitor” is any entity doing business directly or indirectly (e.g., as an owner, investor, provider of capital or otherwise) in the United States including any territory of the United States (the “Territory”) that provides wireless products and/or services that are the same or similar to the wireless products and/or services that are currently being provided at the time of Executive's termination or that were provided by the Company Group during the two-year period prior to the Executive's separation from service with the Company Group.


In all other respects, the terms, conditions and provisions of the Agreement shall remain the same. 




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed by an officer pursuant to the authority of its Board, and the Executive has executed this Amendment, as of the date set forth above.




SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION            EXECUTIVE




/s/ Sandra J. Price                    /s/ Charles R. Wunsch            
By: Sandra J. Price,                     CHARLES R. WUNSCH
Senior Vice President, Human Resources