alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GAGE v. UNITED STATES ATTY. et al.

No. 1107.

District Court, M. D. Pennsylvania.

June 23, 1944.

Peter P. Jurchak, of Wilkes-Barre, Pa., for plaintiff.

Frederick V. Pollmer, U. S. Atty., of Scranton, Pa., for defendant..

WATSON, District Judge.

This suit was brought by C. B. Gage against the United Statés Attorney, Middle District of Pennsylvania, and Charles W. Leach, Custodian Procurement Division, Treasury Department.

In the complaint it is alleged, inter alia, that the plaintiff, at the invitation of the Treasury Department through the Procurement Division, submitted in proper form a bid on certain musical instruments offered for sale in the invitation, that the plaintiff’s bid of $600 was the highest presented in proper form and that the bid of $900 of the Fred Gretch Manufacturing Company, not being a “sealed” bid, but one submitted by telegram, was improperly recognized as valid.

The complaint contains no statement upon which the court’s jurisdiction depends, nor does it contain a demand for judgment for the relief to which the plaintiff deems himself entitled.

The United States Attorney has moved to dismiss the action upon the ground, inter alia, that the complaint has failed to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 8(a), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, provide: “A pleading which sets forth a claim for relief, * * * shall contain (1) a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court’s jurisdiction depends, unless the court already has jurisdiction and the claim needs no new *493grounds of jurisdiction to support it, * * * (3) a demand for judgment for the relief to which he deems himself entitled.”

It is therefore clear that the plaintiff has failed to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and on that ground the action should be dismissed. Not only does the complaint fail to contain grounds for the court’s jurisdiction, but it is obvious that the plaintiff could not comply, even if given further opportunity to do so.

Now, June 23, 1944, this action is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 By:
    /s/  Bryan McGuireName:
    Bryan McGuireTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    August 14, 2008
Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 104 Filed 07/31/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 2014
Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 104 Filed 07/31/12 Page 2 of 7 PageID: 2015
Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 104 Filed 07/31/12 Page 3 of 7 PageID: 2016
Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 104 Filed 07/31/12 Page 4 of 7 PageID: 2017
Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 104 Filed 07/31/12 Page 5 of 7 PageID: 2018
Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 104 Filed 07/31/12 Page 6 of 7 PageID: 2019
Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 104 Filed 07/31/12 Page 7 of 7 PageID: 2020
Case 1:11-cv-02872-NLH-AMD Document 1 Filed 05/19/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 1
Case 1:11-cv-02872-NLH-AMD Document 1 Filed 05/19/11 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 2
Case 1:11-cv-02872-NLH-AMD Document 1 Filed 05/19/11 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 3
Case 1:11-cv-02872-NLH-AMD Document 1 Filed 05/19/11 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 4
Case 1:11-cv-02872-NLH-AMD Document 1 Filed 05/19/11 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 5
Case 2:11-cr-00080-SDW Document 131 Filed 09/12/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 446
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, the undersigned, Jay C. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer, of Forgent Networks, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:



| | 1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ JAY C. PETERSON

Jay C. Peterson

Chief Financial Officer

March 15, 2005
Case 2:11-cv-03329-JLL-MAH   Document 38   Filed 12/27/11   Page 1 of 1 PageID: 843
HOUSEHOLD DATA HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES ANNUAL AVERAGES

28. Unemployed persons by reason for unemployment, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity

(Numbers in thousands)

Reason

White Black or African

American Asian Hispanic or Latinoethnicity

2006 2007 2006 2007 2006 2007 2006 2007

NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYED

 Total unemployed .................................................................. 5,002 5,143 1,549 1,445 205 229 1,081 1,220

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs .......... 2,479 2,667 660 637 83 95 522 635

 On temporary layoff ................................................................ 764 805 115 122 13 16 159 184

 Not on temporary layoff .......................................................... 1,715 1,861 545 515 70 79 363 451

 Permanent job losers ............................................................ 1,236 1,328 351 337 54 56 216 276

 Persons who completed temporary jobs .............................. 479 533 194 178 16 23 147 175

Job leavers ............................................................................... 608 595 161 139 22 25 107 111

Reentrants ................................................................................ 1,514 1,474 564 500 75 79 331 346

New entrants ............................................................................ 401 407 164 169 25 29 121 127

PERCENT DISTRIBUTION

 Total unemployed .................................................................. 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

 Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs ......... 49.6 51.8 42.6 44.1 40.4 41.6 48.3 52.1

 On temporary layoff ............................................................... 15.3 15.7 7.4 8.4 6.4 7.1 14.7 15.1

 Not on temporary layoff ......................................................... 34.3 36.2 35.2 35.6 34.1 34.6 33.6 37.0

 Job leavers .............................................................................. 12.2 11.6 10.4 9.6 10.9 10.9 9.9 9.1

 Reentrants ............................................................................... 30.3 28.7 36.4 34.6 36.6 34.7 30.7 28.4

 New entrants ........................................................................... 8.0 7.9 10.6 11.7 12.1 12.7 11.2 10.4

UNEMPLOYED AS A PERCENT OF THE

 CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE

 Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs ......... 2.0 2.1 3.8 3.6 1.2 1.3 2.5 2.9

 Job leavers .............................................................................. .5 .5 .9 .8 .3 .4 .5 .5

 Reentrants ............................................................................... 1.2 1.2 3.3 2.9 1.1 1.1 1.6 1.6

 New entrants ........................................................................... .3 .3 .9 1.0 .4 .4 .6 .6

 NOTE: Estimates for the above race groups (white, black or African American, and Asian) do not sum to totals because data are not presented for all races. 

Persons whose ethnicity is identified as Hispanic or Latino may be of any race. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January

data.

244
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Healthcare
      Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      Alwin Tan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





1. 
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. 
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
                Alwin TanAlwin
                Tan, Chief Executive OfficerMay
                14, 2008
Case 3:11-cr-00493-AET   Document 7   Filed 03/01/11   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 9

Case 3:11-cr-00493-AET   Document 7   Filed 03/01/11   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 10
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Hassan Hans Badreddine, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (a) | the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      third quarter ended January 31, 2010, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                         

|By:    | /s/ Hassan Hans Badreddine                               | 
|------ | -------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Hassan Hans Badreddine                                   | 
|Title: | President and Chief Executive
      Officer and Director | 
|       | (Principal Executive Officer)                            | 
|Date:  | March 22, 2010                                           | 

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 530 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 530

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

                For the relief of Tanya Andrea Goudeau.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 530

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
                For the relief of Tanya Andrea Goudeau.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR TANYA ANDREA GOUDEAU.

    (a) In General.--Tanya Andrea Goudeau shall be classified as a 
child under section 101(b)(1)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
for purposes of approval of a relative visa petition filed under 
section 204 of such Act by her adoptive parent and the filing of an 
application for an immigrant visa or adjustment of status.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Tanya Andrea Goudeau enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
she shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the petition and the application for 
issuance of an immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of 
status are filed with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Tanya Andrea Goudeau, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
for the current or next following fiscal year, the worldwide level of 
family-sponsored immigrants under section 201(c)(1)(A) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Tanya Andrea 
Goudeau shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR CITIZENSHIP.

    For purposes of section 320 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 
Tanya Andrea Goudeau shall be considered to have satisfied the 
requirements applicable to adopted children under section 101(b)(1) of 
such Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 6, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit
31.3



CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,
Pankaj Mohan, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed
    this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Sonnet BioTherapeutics Holdings, Inc.; and                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|2. | Based on my knowledge,
    this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
    covered by this report.



|Date:
    April 22, 2020 | /s/
    Pankaj Mohan         
|------------------------ | -----------------------------
|                         | Pankaj Mohan                 
|                         | Chief Executive Officer      
|                         | (Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7227
ELWALDO R. JAMES, a/k/a Donald Mitchell, a/k/a Calvin B. Smith, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus J. THICKENS, Investigator, Rock Hill Police Department; C. RUSSELL, Police Officer, Rock Hill Police Department; C. LONG, Chief, Rock Hill City Police Department Jail; individually and in their official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-1114-2-6AJ) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 6, 1997 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elwaldo R. James, Appellant Pro Se. Terry B. Millar, MCKINNEY, GIVENS & MILLAR, P.A., Rock Hill, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error in the denial of § 1983 relief. Nor did the district court abuse its discretion in denyingAppellant's Rule 59(e) motion. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. James v. Thickens , No. CA-94-1114- 2-6AJ (D.S.C. July 2, 1996; July 25, 1996). We also note that although the district court did not address Appellant's request fordeclaratory and injunctive relief, this action is properly construed as a habeas corpus action which requires Appellant to exhaust state court remedies. See Preiser v. Rodriguez , 411 U.S. 475, 489 (1973); Hamlin v. Warren , 664 F.2d 29 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 911 (1982). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CVB Ticket Image Page 1 of 1 

16 

New Citation.Search New Hearing Search 

me eve locatIOn Code a es 0' t ' t C 


Violation Notice 


U 'fi d St t IS riC ourt 

I~J6 I 

VIOlation Number OffICer Name (Print) OffioerNo » 

A 2194186 W\~50'r) ..v,dc)<aj 3').60 N 

YOU ARE CHARGED WITH THE FOLLOWING VIOLATION I---" 

DatI!! and Time of Offense (mn'lodl)wyl Offense Charged [) CFR :J USC )It Slate Coda to 

07/12/200 '7 39' ~""IO 

..r;:::.. 

..... Pll'Oe of Offense CO 

en 

!.:,st 6<a +e J- Oe E'el ""1J",(1 kve.. 

Offense Oes(mpt,on 

DEFENDANT INFORMATION 

Street Address 

D"ve.s License No 

T~NO Color 

A IF BOX A IS CHECKED, YOU B 0 IF BOX B IS CHECKED, YOU MUST 

MUST APPEAR IN COURT SEE PAY AMOUNT INDICATED BELOW INSIRUCTIONS (00 b",k 01 y."()W copy) OR APPEAR IN COURT SEe IN$TAUCI'ONS Ion back Of yti!!OW COPYl 

Forfeiture Amount 

+ $25 Processmg Fee 

PAY THIS AMOUNT ­ ,$ Total Collateral Due 

YOUR COURT DATE 

(II no CDun appearance date 1$ shown, you WIll be no1lfred of your appearanoe date by mall) 

Covrt Address Date (mml<idIYYYY) 

f V<>.r/..2Cc7 

Tll'11e(rt1mm) 

o 'de <'1_ 

My sIgnature srgnliles thaI I nave receIVed a copy 01 thiS v'olatlon rObe.; It 1S not an adml$$IOn 01 gUilt 

I promise 10 appea' fDr the hearing at the time and place Ir.Sjructed or pay the total collateral due 

x DetendMt SIgnature 

00 FORM 1605, JUt. 2005 angInal· CVB Copy 

hnp:I!156.132.86.246!cgi-cvb/getimage.pl?daviss:NJ16:A:A2194186 3121/2008 

Case 2:07-mj-09587-ARM Document 1 Filed 12/05/07 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1
CVB Probable Cause Page 1 of I ~ , . 

16 : A2194J :8 

NewCjJatlQJLSearchNew~Hearing . Search 

STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CAUSE 


(For Issuance of an arrest warrant or summons) 


I state that on -=i.~~, 20~ while exerCIsing my duties as a 

law enforcement officer !n the f.!:...,1"1 C/t""... .,. ... ;J. District of ..L:~::::.J.t:____ 

"y-, ,..(,./It 1:1 :1.':"'2 (;,I- 4(?pt"...>r- ';13 ~ 1',.... 

"''''vr~ S .... bi"'c)/ w~.. ~"C>f'-to 10,,/ -Lr '-' , ') S'c .... r ~'1 t.v.... 1 t e",)-n.",) £:.<d!- c:.~re ... 

-(1.fPV~Io," CJ...., 1'''''''<Sj.''",~,(,,,, feve-=,Ie"~ fh ..."" 

G<>., 't Ci J ~ z. F Co n C H (;' """CJ'S Off:. ('0,;-' .... 5 Cc 

Sv1,\"'c.)- Wet!:) S':>'''''''~("~ joo fl.,~ PO/<;''C. 

S)-",l',';:"('\ O"'~ • ..)S l.Ia~ ~ ~ I if:cS. 

The foregOing statement IS based upon 

my personal observation my personal Investigation 

mformatlon supplied to me from my fellow officer's observation 

other (explain above) 

I declare IJnder penally of per']ury that the Inforrnatlon which I hal/e set forth above and on 

Ihe face of this Violation notice IS true and correct to the besl of my knowledge 

Executed on 0"/1 2/Zop'? ;.!tCl v<..4­

Date (mmJdd/yyyy) OffIcer's Signature 

Probable cause has been stated for the Issuance of a warrant 

Executed on _______________________ 

Date (mm/ddlyyyy) U S Magistrate Judge 

CVB Scan 7/19/2007 1424 10 

http://156.132.86.246/cgi-cvb/getimage.pl?daviss:NJ16;B:A2194186 3/21/2008 

Case 2:07-mj-09587-ARM Document 1 Filed 12/05/07 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2
Exhibit 99.4

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of RADVision Ltd. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Seligman, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/David Seligman*
------------------
David Seligman
Chief Financial Officer
March 30, 2003



* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
Exhibit 32.2
 EXTERRAN PARTNERS, L.P.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Partnership.
 /s/Michael J. AaronsonMichael J. AaronsonChief Financial Officer, Exterran GP LLC
As General Partner of Exterran General Partner, L.P.
As General Partner of Exterran Partners, L.P.