alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4968 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4968

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 7, 2004

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 25 McHenry Street in Rosine, Kentucky, as the ``Bill Monroe Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 25 
McHenry Street in Rosine, Kentucky, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Bill Monroe Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Bill Monroe Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 6, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 99.2

Certification pursuant to Section 1350  of Chapter 63 of Title 18  of the United States Code

I, David Obstler, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Pinnacor Inc. (the "Company"), certify that (i) the Company's 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such
10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/DAVID OBSTLERDavid Obstler, CFO & Treasurer
Date: March 31, 2003 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5005 Considered and Passed House (CPH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5005

Making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending 
        September 30, 2004, for additional disaster assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 7, 2004

Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on 
the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

                           September 7, 2004

          Considered under suspension of the rules and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
Making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending 
        September 30, 2004, for additional disaster assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the following sums 
are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004, to provide 
emergency supplemental appropriations for additional disaster 
assistance, namely:

                    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

                  EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE

                            Disaster Relief

    For an additional amount for ``Disaster Relief'', $2,000,000,000, 
to remain available until expended, of which up to $30,000,000 may be 
transferred to ``Small Business Administration--Salaries and 
Expenses'', for administrative expenses to carry out the disaster loans 
program authorized by section 7(b) of the Small Business Act: Provided, 
That the amounts provided herein are designated as an emergency 
requirement pursuant to section 402 of S. Con. Res. 95 (108th 
Congress), as made applicable to the House of Representatives by H. 
Res. 649 (108th Congress) and applicable to the Senate by section 14007 
of Public Law 108-287.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Emergency Supplemental 
Appropriations for Disaster Relief Act, 2004''.
                                 <all>
```
LITE DEPALMA GREENBERG, LLC 

Allyn Z. Lite 

Michael E. Patunas 

Mayra V. Tarantino 

Two Gateway Center, Suite 1201 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

(973) 623-3000 

alite@litedepalma.com

mpatunas@litedepalma.com

mtarantino@litedepalma.com

Attorneys for Defendants Hanmi USA, Inc., 

Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 

Hanmi Fine Chemical Co., Ltd., and 

 Hanmi Holdings Co., Ltd. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

ASTRAZENECA AB, AKTIEBOLAGET 

HÄSSLE, ASTRAZENECA LP, KBI INC., 

and KBI-E INC., 

 Plaintiffs and 

 Counterclaim Defendants, 

 v. 

HANMI USA, INC., HANMI 

PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., HANMI 

FINE CHEMICAL CO., LTD, and HANMI 

HOLDINGS CO., LTD., 

 Defendants and 

 Counterclaim Plaintiffs. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

:

Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00760-JAP-TJB 

NOTICE OF MOTION TO AMEND 

CONTENTIONS 

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on November 19, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon 

thereafter as counsel may be heard, the undersigned attorneys for Defendants Hanmi USA, Inc., 

Hanmi Fine Chemical Co., Ltd., and Hanmi Holdings Co., Ltd. (collectively “Hanmi”) will move 

Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB Document 238 Filed 10/15/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 8784
2

before the Honorable Tonianne J. Bongiovanni, U.S.M.J., at the United States District Court, 

Clarkson S. Fisher Federal Bldg. & U.S. Courthouse, 402 E. State Street, Trenton, New Jersey, 

for an order granting Hanmi leave to amend its contentions pursuant to Local Patent Rules 3.6 

and 3.7. 

 PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that in support of this motion, Defendants will 

rely upon the Memorandum in Support of Hanmi’s Motion to Amend Its Contentions, the 

Declaration of Mayra V. Tarantino, and the files and records of this case. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(e), a 

proposed form of order is also submitted. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Local Civil Rule 78.1(b) oral 

argument is requested in the event opposition to this motion is submitted. 

Dated: October 15, 2012 LITE DEPALMA GREENBERG, LLC 

 s/Mayra V. Tarantino 

Allyn Z. Lite 

Michael E. Patunas 

Mayra V. Tarantino 

Two Gateway Center, Suite 1201 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

(973) 623-3000 

alite@litedepalma.com

mpatunas@litedepalma.com 

mtarantino@litedepalma.com

Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB Document 238 Filed 10/15/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 8785
3

Mark Boland 

Michael R. Dzwonczyk 

Renita S. Rathinam 

SUGHRUE MION, PLLC 

2100 Pennsylvania Ave. NW 

Washington, DC 20037 

(202) 293-7060 

mboland@sughrue.com 

mdzwonczyk@sughrue.com 

rrathinam@sughrue.com

John B. Scherling 

SUGHRUE MION, PLLC 

 4250 Executive Square, Suite 900 

 La Jolla, California 92037 

 (858) 795.1180 

jscherling@sughrue.com

 Attorneys for Defendants Hanmi USA, Inc., 

 Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 

 Hanmi Fine Chemical Co., Ltd., and 

 Hanmi Holdings Co., Ltd. 

Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB Document 238 Filed 10/15/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 8786
#### Central Trust Co. *v.*Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co. (Hannibal Water Co., Intervenor.)1

*(Circuit Court, E.*D. *Missouri.*

June 26, 1886.)

Water. Companies—Contracts—Sales—Railroads.

‘Where, under a contract with a water company, a railroad is authorized to use a specified quantity of water for so much per annum, but consumes only a portion of that quantity, it cannot sell the balance.

In Equity.

This is an action to recover the value of water taken by the receivers of the Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Company from the mains of the intervenor, at the round-house of the Missouri Pacific Railway Company. The defense is that the water was sold to the defendant by the Missouri Pacific Railway Company, and that the *795latter had a right, under its contract with intervenor, to make the sale. Said contract provides that the intervenor shall furnish water to the Missouri Pacific Eailway Company, “at Hannibal station, in their tank, at round-house, and at Penstock, * *' * for the general uses of the road qt this point, for a term of ten years, * * * for the sum of $1,080 per annum. * * * It is further agreed and understood that the above price * * * is based on an average daily consumption of 50,000 gallons, to be determined either by meter measurement or by the estimated capacity of the engines watered. * * * When said daily average shall exceed 50,000 gallons, the party of the second part shall pay for such excess at the rate of 10 cents per 1,000 gallons.” The amount used by both the Wabash and the Missouri Pacific Eailway Company did not exceed 50,000 gallons per month.

*H. D. Wood,*for intervenor.

G. *S. Grover,*for receivers.

1

 Reported by Benj. E. Rex, Esq., of the St. Louis bar.

Treat, J.,

*(orally.)*In the matter of the intervening petition of the Hannibal Water Company, according to the terms of the contract submitted to the court, it appears that an arrangement was made between the intervenor and the Missouri Pacific Eailroad for tlio supply of water, determined by the provisions of said contract. There was no authority on the part of the Missouri Pacific Eailroad to sublet or furnish supplies to other parties. It having done so, and received from the respondent in this case that amount of money, it should refund the same, for the value of the water supplied belongs to the intervenor, and not to the Missouri Pacific.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CAMDEN VICINAGE

CITY SELECT AUTO SALES, INC., a New Jersey

corporation, individually and as the representative of a

class of similarly-situated persons,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVID RANDALL ASSOCIATES, INC. and

RAYMOND MILEY III,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW

REQUEST BY LOCAL COUNSEL FOR

PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY

TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC NOTIFICATION

Request is hereby made by local counsel for pro hac vice counsel to receive electronic notification in the

within matter, and it is represented that:

1. An order of the Court granting a motion to appear pro hac vice in the within matter has been

entered and;

2. If admission was granted after March 22, 2005, the Admission Fee, in the amount of $150,

pursuant to L. Civ. R. 101.1 (c) (3), has been paid to the Clerk of the Court.

S/Alan C. Milstein

Signature of Local Counsel

PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY INFORMATION:

Name: Jonathan B. Piper

Address: Bock & Hatch, LLC

134 N. La Salle St., Ste. 1000

Chicago, IL 60602

Email: jon@bockhatchllc.com

Instructions for LOCAL COUNSEL for filing:

1. Select the Case Type (Civil) from the menu bar at the top of your screen.

2. Click on Notices.

3. Select the event, Notice of Pro Hac Vice to Receive NEF.

4. Enter the case for which the Request is being filed.

5. Select the PDF document to file.

6. Proofread the docket text.

7. Submit the Request to ECF by clicking the NEXT button.

Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 96 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 3648
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 519 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 519

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of the 
          San Gabriel River Watershed, and for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 519

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of the 
          San Gabriel River Watershed, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``San Gabriel River Watershed Study 
Act''.

SEC. 2. STUDY OF SAN GABRIEL RIVER WATERSHED.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior (hereafter in this 
Act referred to as the ``Secretary'') shall conduct a special resource 
study of the following areas:
            (1) The San Gabriel River and its tributaries north of and 
        including the city of Santa Fe Springs.
            (2) The San Gabriel Mountains within the territory of the 
        San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains 
        Conservancy (as defined in section 32603(c)(1)(C) of the State 
        of California Public Resource Code).
    (b) Study Conduct and Completion.--Section 8(c) of Public Law 91-
383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)) shall apply to the conduct and completion of 
the study conducted under this section.
    (c) Consultation with Federal, State, and Local Governments.--In 
conducting the study under this section, the Secretary shall consult 
with the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains 
Conservancy and other appropriate Federal, State, and local 
governmental entities.
    (d) Considerations.--In conducting the study under this section, 
the Secretary shall consider regional flood control and drainage needs 
and publicly owned infrastructure such as wastewater treatment 
facilities.

SEC. 3. REPORT.

    Not later than 3 years after funds are made available for this Act, 
the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Resources of the House of 
Representatives a report on the findings, conclusions, and 
recommendations of the study.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 19, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
ME1 13999407v.1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

OREXO AB, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. 

and MYLAN INC., 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 11-3788 (MAS)(LHG)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ANNA BROOK 

TO: THE CLERK OF COURT AND ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby appears as attorney of record for 

Plaintiff Orexo AB. The undersigned hereby certifies that she is admitted to practice before this 

court. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & McCLOY

Dated: September 4, 2012 By: s/ Anna Brook______ 

 Anna Brook 

E-mail: abrook@milbank.com

Errol B. Taylor 

Fredrick M. Zullow 

MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & McCLOY LLP 

One Chase Manhattan Plaza 

New York, New York 10005-1413 

(212) 530-5000 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Orexo AB 

Case 3:11-cv-03788-MAS-LHG Document 90 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 828
ME1 13999407v.1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on September 4, 2012, I caused a copy of the foregoing NOTICE OF 

APPEARANCE to be served upon all counsel of record via email. 

By: s/ Anna Brook______ 

 Anna Brook 

Case 3:11-cv-03788-MAS-LHG Document 90 Filed 09/04/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 829
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Skagit State Bancorp, Inc.  on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), we, Cheryl Bishop, Chief Executive Officer, and Carla F.Tucker, Executive Vice-President/Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
| /s/ Cheryl R. Bishop      |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Cheryl R. Bishop          |   |
| Chief Executive Officer   |   |
|                      |   |
|                      |   |
| /s/ Carla F. Tucker       |   |
| Carla F. Tucker           |   |
| Executive  Vice-President |   |
| Chief Financial  Officer  |   |
|                      |   |
|                      |   |
| May 14, 2009         |   |
| Date                      |   |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 10.29
 CHANGE IN TERMS AGREEMENT
 Principal
    
    Loan Date
    
    Maturity
    
    Loan No
    
    Call / Coll
    
    Account
    
    Officer
    
    Initials$4,606,511.50
    
    09-07-2007
    
    03-23-2008
    
    
    3787
    
    
    
    2200
    
    
    
    
    
    242
 
 Borrower:
    
    Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC (TIN:
    
    Lender:
    
    Home Federal Savings Bank48-1200438)
    
    
    
    Business Banking106 W Main, PO Box C
    
    
    
    1016 Civic Center Dr NW Suite 300Riceville, IA 50466
    
    
    
    Rochester, MN 55901
  Principal Amount: $4,606,511.50
    
    Interest Rate: 8.250%
    
    Date of Agreement: September 7, 2007
 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING INDEBTEDNESS.
 DESCRIPTION OF COLLATERAL.
 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE IN TERMS.
 PAYMENT. Borrower will pay this loan in one principal payment of $4,606,511.50 plus interest on
March 23, 2008. This payment due on March 23, 2008, will be for all principal and all accrued
interest not yet paid.
 CONTINUING VALIDITY.
 PRIOR TO SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT, BORROWER READ AND UNDERSTOOD ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THIS
AGREEMENT. BORROWER AGREES TO THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT.
 BORROWER ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF A COMPLETED COPY OF THIS CHANGE IN TERMS AGREEMENT AND ALL
OTHER DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THIS DEBT.
 BORROWER:
 HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC
 By:
    
    /s/ Stephen K. Eastman        President
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Bernard RetterathSteve Eastman, President of Homeland Energy
    
    
    
    
    
    Bernard Retterath, Treasurer of Homeland EnergySolutions, LLC
    
    
    
    
    
    Solutions, LLC
BAC-12.31.2012-10K EX. 10 (d)






Exhibit 10(d)


BANK OF AMERICA
EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN


Instrument of Amendment
THIS INSTRUMENT OF AMENDMENT (the “Instrument”) is executed this 23rd day of January, 2013 by BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”).
Statement of Purpose
The Corporation maintains the Bank of America Corporation Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”). The Corporation desires to amend the Plan as set forth herein to change the divisor price under the Plan from a five (5) day average closing price to a ten (10) day average closing price of the Corporation's common stock, preceding and including the applicable grant date. In Section 7 of the Plan, the Corporation has reserved the right to amend the Plan.


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of the date hereof as follows:
1.    The definition of “Fair Market Value” under Section 3 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:


“Fair Market Value” of a share of the Corporation's common stock as of a given date means the average Closing Price of a share of such common stock for the ten (10) consecutive trading days ending on the applicable date.


2.    Except as expressly or by necessary implication amended hereby, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Instrument to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of the day and year first above written.


BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION


	
		
	By:
	/s/ Andrea B. Smith




Andrea B. Smith, Global Head of Human Resources
#### Barbe Ramon, Respondent, v Julio Ramon, Appellant.

[855 NYS2d 184]

A stipulation of settlement in a matrimonial action is a contract subject to principles of contract interpretation *(see Petrovich v Obradovic,*40 AD3d 1063, 1065 [2007]; *Clark v Clark,*33 AD3d 836, 837 [2006]; *Sieratzki v Sieratzki,*8 AD3d 552 [2004]; *De Luca v De Luca,*300 AD2d 342 [2002]). Where the stipulation is “clear and unambiguous on its face, the intent of the parties must be gleaned from within the four corners of the instrument, and not from extrinsic evidence” *(Rainbow v Swisher,*72 NY2d 106, 109 [1988]; *see Perry v Perry,*13 AD3d 508, 509 [2004]; *Douglas v Douglas,*7 AD3d 481, 482 [2004]).

In this case, the child support provisions of the parties’ stipulation of settlement, which were incorporated but not merged *844into the parties’ divorce judgment, provided that the child support obligation would be adjusted annually to reflect “income changes and major financial changes” of the parties “according to the Child Support Standards Act” *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b]). The stipulation set forth both the initial annual and monthly payments of child support to be made by the defendant—amounting to the statutory guideline percentage rate of 17% applicable to his total income, less certain deductions *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [b] [3] [i])—and set forth his income as of the date of the stipulation, which substantially exceeded $80,000 *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [c]).

The Supreme Court properly determined that the defendant failed to establish that the stipulation was unfair or inequitable at the time it was made, or that a substantial, unanticipated, and unreasonable change in circumstances had occurred resulting in a concomitant need *(see Merl v Merl,*67 NY2d 359, 362 [1986]; *Matter of Davis v Davis,*13 AD3d 623, 624 [2004]; *Rich v Rich,*234 AD2d 354 [1996]), so as to warrant its modification.

The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court erred in failing to impose a cap on the combined parental income, upon which his child support obligation may be based, is without merit. The stipulation of settlement contains no provision for such a cap *(see Phillips v Phillips,*300 AD2d 642, 644 [2002]).

The parties’ remaining contentions are without merit. Skelos, J.P., Lifson, Santucci and Balkin, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors and Shareholders 

Sonic Innovations, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-104239, 333-36562, 333-59988, 333-76250, 333-98303, 333-99035, 333-115524, 333-124814) on Form S-8 of Sonic Innovations, Inc. of our reports dated March 16, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets ofSonic Innovations, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December31, 2005 and the related financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-Kof Sonic Innovations, Inc. 

Salt Lake City, Utah 

March 16,2006
October 1, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HERBERT GARFILED GARDNER, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00690-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.