alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Brendan J. McGill,  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Harleysville  Savings  Financial  Corporation (the  "Company"),  hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, that:

     (1)  The Annual  report on Form 10-K of the  Company  for the  fiscal  year
          ended  September  30,  2002 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m(a) or 78o(d); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                      By:      /s/ Brendan J. McGill
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Brendan J. McGill
                                               Senior Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer

Date:    December 18, 2002
Case 2:11-cv-00796-WJM Document 2 Filed 04/05/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 14
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Monarch Financial Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                     |  |                  
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|/s/ Brad E. Schwartz                                
|Brad E. Schwartz,                                   
|Chief Executive Officer                             
|                                                    
|/s/ Lynette P. Harris.                              
|Lynette P. Harris                                   
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                     | 
|Date:                                                |  | December 15, 2010



6
EXHIBIT 31.1
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ming S. Liu, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of eGene,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report (the "Annual Report") on Form 10-KSB of
the Company.

2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Annual Report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report.

4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this Annual Report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this Annual Report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the Company's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the Company's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.

Dated: March 31, 2005              By:    /s/ Ming S. Liu
                                   Ming S. Liu
                                   Chairman of the Board and
                                   Chief Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, the undersigned, Richard N. Snyder, Chief Executive Officer, of Forgent
Networks, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:  1.
    
    The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
period ended January 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ RICHARD N. SNYDERRichard N. Snyder
Chief Executive Officer
March 16, 2004
Case 2:11-cv-03496-JLL-MAH Document 35 Filed 01/09/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 703
Case 2:11-cv-03496-JLL-MAH Document 35 Filed 01/09/12 Page 2 of 9 PageID: 704
Case 2:11-cv-03496-JLL-MAH Document 35 Filed 01/09/12 Page 3 of 9 PageID: 705
Case 2:11-cv-03496-JLL-MAH Document 35 Filed 01/09/12 Page 4 of 9 PageID: 706
Case 2:11-cv-03496-JLL-MAH Document 35 Filed 01/09/12 Page 5 of 9 PageID: 707
Case 2:11-cv-03496-JLL-MAH Document 35 Filed 01/09/12 Page 6 of 9 PageID: 708
Case 2:11-cv-03496-JLL-MAH Document 35 Filed 01/09/12 Page 7 of 9 PageID: 709
Case 2:11-cv-03496-JLL-MAH Document 35 Filed 01/09/12 Page 8 of 9 PageID: 710
Case 2:11-cv-03496-JLL-MAH Document 35 Filed 01/09/12 Page 9 of 9 PageID: 711
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Click Commerce, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael W. Nelson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.

                                            /s/  Michael W. Nelson.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Michael W. Nelson
                                            Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  March 28, 2003
EX-10.54



 Exhibit 10.54 
 FIFTH AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 BETWEEN FOSTER WHEELER INC. 
 AND 

FRANCO BASEOTTO 
 This FIFTH AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement between FOSTER WHEELER INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and FRANCO BASEOTTO (the
“Executive”), dated as of May 6, 2008 (the “Agreement”), is made and entered into effective as of January 1, 2013 (the “Amendment Effective Date”). 

WHEREAS, Foster Wheeler Ltd. entered into the Agreement with the Executive; 

WHEREAS, the Company thereafter assumed the Agreement from Foster Wheeler Ltd. on or about February 9, 2009, and the Company
and the Executive entered into a (i) First Amendment to the Agreement, effective January 18, 2010, (ii) Second Amendment to the Agreement, effective May 4, 2010, (iii) a letter amendment, dated March 14, 2012, and
(iv) Fourth Amendment to the Agreement, dated October 29, 2012; 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to eliminate
the gross-up it provides for taxable income on certain perquisites under the Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to
Section 9.9 of the Agreement, an amendment to the Agreement may be made pursuant to the written consent of the Company and the Executive. 
 NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree that the Agreement is amended as follows: 

1. Agreement Section 3.7 is hereby revised to read in its entirety as follows: 

“3.7 Perquisites. During the Term, the Executive shall be provided by the Company with the following perquisites:

 3.7.1 an annual physical examination; 
 3.7.2 an annual automobile allowance based upon the current Company policy; 

3.7.3 home office equipment and associated services for business use in Executive’s homes not to exceed $5,000 per year; 

3.7.4 annual reimbursement for the reasonable fees associated with financial planning and income tax advice and document preparation not
to exceed $5,000 per year; and 
 3.7.5 reimbursement for a one-time cost of estate planning services, at a time selected by the
Executive during the Term, not to exceed $10,000 in the aggregate.” 
 As of the Amendment Effective Date, Executive shall
not be eligible to receive a gross-up for taxable income on the perquisites provided under this Section 3.7. For the avoidance of doubt, the elimination of the gross-up for taxable income in this Section 3.7 shall not affect the
Executive’s gross-up on taxable income to the extent the Executive is eligible for a gross-up under another section of the Agreement. 







 2. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in two (2) or more counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed to be an original but all of which together constitute one (1) and the same instrument. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Fifth Amendment to the Agreement effective as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	FOSTER WHEELER INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ J. Kent Masters

	Name:	 	J. Kent Masters
	Title:	 	President & CEO
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Franco Baseotto

		 	FRANCO BASEOTTO



  
 2
**Exhibit32.1**

**UNIVERSALCOMPRESSION PARTNERS, L.P.**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report* of Universal Compression Partners, L.P. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 (the “Report”), I, StephenA. Snider, Chief Executive Officer of the general partner of the Company’sgeneral partner, UCO GP, LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ STEPHEN A. SNIDER                                       |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Stephen A. Snider                                           |
| Chief Executive Officer, UCO GP, LLC                        |
| As General  Partner of UCO General Partner, LP              |
| As General  Partner of Universal Compression Partners, L.P. |
|                                                        |
| November 21, 2006                                           |

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report* of Universal Compression Partners, L.P. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Daniel K.Schlanger, Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of the Company’sgeneral partner, UCO GP, LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/  DANIEL K. SCHLANGER                                    |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Daniel K. Schlanger                                         |
| Chief Financial Officer, UCO GP, LLC                        |
| As General  Partner of UCO General Partner, LP              |
| As General  Partner of Universal Compression Partners, L.P. |
|                                                        |
| November 21, 2006                                           |

 

 

----

*                 Thisreport presents the financial condition of the registrant and the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant’spredecessor, the natural gas contract compression business that is provided inthe United States of America by Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. and itssubsidiaries.

----
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Marcio C. CabreraMarcio C. CabreraNovember 12, 2008
    Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC,

 Plaintiff,

v.

KAREN BAREL and ARIEL BAREL,

 Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 11-3329 (JLL)

ORDER

This matter comes before this Court by way of Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand this action

to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Passaic County [Docket Entry No. 20].

The Court has considered the Plaintiff’s submissions and Defendants’ opposition thereto, and

rules on the motion on the papers pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. For the reasons stated in the

accompanying Opinion, and for good cause shown,

IT IS on this 17 day of November, 2011,

th

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand this matter to State Court is GRANTED;

and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant’s Notice of Removal filed on June 9, 2011 is DENIED; and

it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall close the file in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Jose L. Linares 

United States District Judge

Case 2:11-cv-03329-JLL-MAH Document 29 Filed 11/17/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 796
Case 3:11-cr-00069-PGS Document 12 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 18
Case 3:11-cr-00069-PGS Document 12 Filed 03/11/11 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 19
Case 3:11-cr-00069-PGS Document 12 Filed 03/11/11 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 20
Case 3:11-cr-00069-PGS Document 12 Filed 03/11/11 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 21
Case 3:11-cr-00069-PGS Document 12 Filed 03/11/11 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 22
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders
                                                                              Ending
Class                   Interest             Principal      Losses           Balance
<S>                     <C>                  <C>            <C>              <C>
A1                    51,672,537.88     262,345,713.23         0.00        720,718,286.77
A2                    19,153,921.46      39,011,028.04         0.00        236,667,971.96
B                      1,044,842.03               0.00         0.00         13,534,000.00
M1                     2,499,972.94               0.00         0.00         40,604,000.00
M2                     2,680,999.11               0.00         0.00         40,604,000.00
P                              0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
R1                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
R2                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
R3                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
X                     13,813,373.09               0.00         0.00                  0.00
</TABLE>
#### MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. v. KELLY.

No. 2869.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

March 17, 1943.

*29Richard A. Smith, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Henry Thomas Dolan, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

BARD, District Judge.

Defendant has filed a motion for a more definite complaint.

This is an action for damages for breach of a written contract between plaintiff and defendant in which defendant agreed to indemnify plaintiff against any loss it might sustain in executing a bond to the General State Authority, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, on behalf of one Mark, a contractor. A photostatic copy of this contract, which formed part of Mark’s application to the plaintiff for the bond, is attached to the complaint as an exhibit. The complaint further alleges that plaintiff executed the bond, but that Mark failed to perform his contract with the General State Authority, as a result of which plaintiff was obliged to, and did, pay out the sum of $5,-560.67 for which it instituted the present action against the defendant.

Defendant has filed a motion for a more definite complaint to compel plaintiff to attach a copy of the contract between Mark and the General State Authority and to compel him to set forth when and in what respects Mark is alleged to have failed in the performance thereof.

There is nothing in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, which requires a plaintiff to include in his complaint a copy of a contract on which his suit is based. Indeed, official forms Nos. 3, 12 and 13, all of which are forms of complaints based on written agreements, specifically allow the pleader the choice of quoting the agreement verbatim, including it by exhibit, or pleading it according to its legal effect. Therefore, even if the contract between Mark and the General State Authority be regarded for purposes of this action as the contract in suit, there is no requirement in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that a copy thereof be incorporated in or attached to the complaint.

Defendant claims, however, that he is entitled to know in what respects it is alleged that Mark failed to perform his contract, as a result of which plaintiff makes claim against defendant as indemnitor. In an “Answer” to the defendant’s motion for a more definite complaint, plaintiff has set forth the contents of a letter which it alleges it wrote to the defendant stating the amounts it was obliged to pay on its bond for Mark, the names of the persons to whom such payments were made, and the dates of the payments. Defendant insists, however, that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for an “Answer” to a motion for more definite complaint and that averments as to Mark’s defaults should appear in the complaint. While this may appear unduly technical in a case where defendant apparently knows the facts it seeks by this motion, it will further the purpose and effectiveness of the Rules if the issues are created by the pleadings therein provided.

Motion sustained, with leave to file an amended complaint.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.01

                   CONSENT OF KPMG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
ONI Systems Corp.:

   We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 dated February 28, 2001 to register common stock associated with the
2000 Equity Incentive Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of ONI Systems
Corp., of our report dated February 7, 2001, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of ONI Systems Corp. as of December 31, 1999, and 2000, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit),
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 2000, which report appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form
10-K of ONI Systems Corp.

Mountain View, California
March 30, 2001