alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5042

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 6, 2004

Received 

AN ACT

To amend the Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 

1944 to ensure that the dependents of employees of 

the Forest Service stationed in Puerto Rico receive a 

high-quality elementary and secondary education.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 5042 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO COVER EXPENSES OF PRIMARY 

2 AND SECONDARY SCHOOLING OF DEPEND3 ENTS OF FOREST SERVICE PERSONNEL IN 

4 PUERTO RICO. 

5 Section 202 of the Department of Agriculture Or6 ganic Act of 1944 (16 U.S.C. 554b) is amended—

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) PROVISION OF MEDICAL

8 CARE; RELATED TRANSPORTATION.—’’ before ‘‘Ap9 propriations for the Forest Service’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub11 section: 

12 ‘‘(b) COVERAGE OF DEPENDENT EDUCATIONAL EX13 PENSES IN PUERTO RICO; RELATED TRANSPORTATION.—

14 (1) Appropriations for the Forest Service shall be available 

15 to the Secretary of Agriculture to cover the cost of pri16 mary and secondary schooling of dependents of Forest 

17 Service personnel, who are stationed in Puerto Rico and 

18 are subject to transfer and reassignment to other locations 

19 in the United States, but not to exceed the costs author20 ized by the Department of Defense for the same area for 

21 dependents of members of the Armed Forces, when it is 

22 determined by the Secretary that the schools available in 

23 the area of Puerto Rico in which the dependents reside 

24 are unable to provide adequately for the education of the 

25 dependents. 
3

HR 5042 RDS 

1 ‘‘(2) If the Secretary determines that the school at2 tended by a dependent described in paragraph (1) is not 

3 accessible by public means of transportation on a regular 

4 basis, the Secretary may provide, out of funds appro5 priated for the Forest Service, for the transportation of 

6 the dependent between the school and the place of resi7 dence of the dependent.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 5, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coastal Media Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jon Suk, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
10th day of May, 2007.


/s/ Jon Suk
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                          |   |   |                                                                                                     |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                    November 10,                    2008 |   |   | /s/ Harold                  Brand                                                              |
|                                                               |   |   | Harold                        BrandChief                        Executive                        Officer |

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19
- 0717 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LYNDSEY MAE LALICKER,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 26 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Beth Baker Justice, Montana Supreme Court January 20 2021

01/20/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0717
#### MARKEM-IMAJE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ZIPHER LTD. and Videojet Technologies, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 2013-1032.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 25, 2013.

Kara F. Stoll, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP., of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. With her on the brief was Garth D. Baer.

Before NEWMAN, LINN, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Subsequent to the district court’s final judgment the parties agreed to a settlement that leaves no “legitimate, continuing case or controversy.” *Allflex USA, Inc. v. Avid Identification Sys., Inc.,*704 F.3d 1362, 1369 (Fed.Cir.2013). Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed.

DISMISSED

No costs.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| Dated:                May 14, 2007                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |   |   |   |
| By:                 /s/                Kelly Fan                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |   |   |        |
| Name:                 Kelly                FanTitle:                   President,                Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer,                and Director  (Principal                Executive, Financial, and Accounting                Officer) |   |   |        |

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coastal Media Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jon
Suk, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
7th day of November, 2006.


/s/  Jon Suk
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
- - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

ASTRAZENECA AB, AKTIEBOLAGET 

HÄSSLE, ASTRAZENECA LP, KBI INC., 

and KBI-E INC., 

Plaintiffs and 

Counterclaim-Defendants,

 v. 

HANMI USA, INC., HANMI 

PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., HANMI 

FINE CHEMICAL CO., LTD, and HANMI 

HOLDINGS CO., LTD., 

 

Defendants and 

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs. 

Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00760-JAP-TJB 

Judge Joel A. Pisano 

Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni 

DECLARATION OF PATRICK L. CHEN IN SUPPORT 

OF PLAINTIFFS’ BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO PRECLUDE 

DEFENDANTS’ EXPERT DR. ATWOOD FROM RELYING ON 

EVIDENCE FIRST IDENTIFIED IN HIS REPLY EXPERT REPORT 

(i.e., TEST REPORTS AND OPINIONS OF DRS. KIRSCHNING AND 

HORNCHEN AND PROF. BRAUN) FOR WHICH DISCOVERY IS UNAVAILABLE 

I, Patrick L. Chen, hereby declare as follows, 

1. I am an associate at the law firm of Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, 1290 

Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10104-3800, counsel for Plaintiffs AstraZeneca

AB, Aktiebolaget Hässle, AstraZeneca LP, KBI Inc., and KBI-E Inc. in connection with the 

present action. 

2. I make this Declaration on my personal knowledge in support of Plaintiffs’ 

Motion in Limine to Preclude Defendants’ Expert Dr. Jerry Atwood from Relying on Evidence 

First Identified in His Reply Expert Report (i.e., Test Reports and Opinions of Drs. Kirschning 

and Hornchen and Prof. Braun) for Which Discovery is Unavailable. 

3. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the transcript of 

Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB Document 295-1 Filed 04/29/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 11429
- - 2

the April 26, 2013 deposition of Jerry L Atwood, Ph.D. 

4. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the March 25, 2013 Rebuttal 

Report of Stephen G. Davies, D.Phil. on Validity. 

5. Attached as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of the April 8, 2013 Reply Expert 

Report of Jerry L. Atwood, Ph.D. 

6. Attached as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of the April 17, 2013 Sur-Reply 

Expert Report of Stephen G. Davies, D.Phil. Concerning Validity. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: April 29, 2013 

Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB Document 295-1 Filed 04/29/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 11430
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

35. Persons not in the labor force by desire and availability for work, age, and sex

[In thousands]

Category

Total Age Sex

2010 2011

16 to 24

years

25 to 54

years

55 years

and over Men Women

2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011

Total not in the labor force. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83,941 86,001 17,014 17,201 22,350 22,961 44,577 45,839 33,189 34,343 50,752 51,658

Do not want a job now1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77,882 79,564 14,990 15,177 19,659 20,107 43,233 44,280 30,309 31,298 47,573 48,266

Want a job1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,059 6,437 2,024 2,023 2,691 2,854 1,344 1,560 2,880 3,045 3,179 3,392

Did not search for work in previous

year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,948 3,268 968 1,010 1,189 1,303 791 955 1,279 1,463 1,669 1,804

Searched for work in previous year,

but not in past 4 weeks2

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,111 3,169 1,056 1,014 1,502 1,551 553 605 1,601 1,582 1,510 1,587

Not available to work now. . . . . . . . . . . . . 623 597 274 262 284 262 65 73 264 236 359 361

Marginally attached (available to work

now)3

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,487 2,573 782 752 1,218 1,289 487 532 1,337 1,346 1,151 1,227

Discouraged over job

prospects4

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,173 989 291 222 595 519 287 248 731 579 442 410

Reasons other than

discouragement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,315 1,584 491 530 623 770 200 284 606 767 709 817

Family responsibilities. . . . . . . . . . . . 286 215 49 30 171 139 66 45 83 48 203 166

In school or training. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350 323 262 245 81 75 7 4 191 183 158 140

Ill health or disability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 169 4 18 21 93 25 58 21 86 29 83

Other5

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 629 877 176 238 350 463 102 177 311 449 318 428

1 Includes some persons who are not asked if they want a job.

2 Persons who had a job in the prior 12 months must have searched since the end of that job.

3 Persons ′′marginally attached to the labor force′′ are those who want a job, have searched for work during the prior 12 months, and were available to take a job during the

reference week, but had not looked for work in the past 4 weeks.

4 Discouraged workers are persons marginally attached to the labor force who did not actively look for work in the prior 4 weeks for reasons such as thinks no work available,

could not find work, lacks schooling or training, employer thinks too young or old, and other types of discrimination.

5 Includes those who did not actively look for work in the prior 4 weeks for such reasons as child-care and transportation problems, as well as a small number for which reason

for nonparticipation was not ascertained.

NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

1
Case 2:10-cv-03872-ES-JAD Document 5 Filed 09/29/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 48
Case 2:10-cv-03872-ES-JAD Document 5 Filed 09/29/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 49
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.3

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of Ivanhoe Energy Inc.:

o     Registration Statement No. 333-12976 on Form S-8;
o     Registration Statement No. 333-113054 on Form S-8; and
o     Registration Statement No. 333-109783 on Form F-10

of our reports dated February 26, 2004, appearing in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Chartered Accountants
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
March 15, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Velocity
Asset Management, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2006, I, James J.
Mastriani, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.   Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006
     fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
     ended December 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
     financial condition and results of operations of Velocity Asset Management,
     Inc.


Dated: April 5, 2007                   /s/ JAMES J. MASTRIANI
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       James J. Mastriani
                                       Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:09-cv-02440-PGS-DEA Document 89 Filed 09/29/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 2606
Case 3:09-cv-02440-PGS-DEA Document 89 Filed 09/29/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2607
Exhibit 10.43


 


EXPONENT, INC.


 


[1999 Stock Option Plan or 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan]


Amendment to Stock Option Agreement


 


 


The following amendment to your [Insert Grant Date] stock
option grant award agreement is effective February 15, 2013:


 


Dividend Equivalent Payments. If the Company declares
and pays an ordinary cash dividend to its shareholders while any portion of the Option remains outstanding and unvested, the Optionee
may become entitled to receive a dividend equivalent payment, subject to the following limitations. Any such dividend equivalent
payment will be paid, in cash, on the date of vesting of the applicable portion of the Option. Any such payment will be equal to
the aggregate of any ordinary cash dividends distributed by the Company to its shareholders, from the date of grant until the applicable
vesting date, on a single share of common stock multiplied by the number of shares underlying the portion of the Option vesting
on such date.


 


Once any portion of the Option has vested, the Optionee thereafter
will have the right to receive a dividend equivalent payment with respect to the vested, unexercised portion of the Option, which
payment (if any) will be made quarterly on the first day of the calendar quarter following the
most recent dividend record date. Any such payment will be equal to the dividends paid on a share of Common Stock multiplied
by the number of shares relating to such vested portion of the Option. In no event will an Optionee
receive more than one dividend equivalent payment per record date per Option share.


 


For clarity, if any portion (or all) of the Option never vests
for any reason, the Optionee will not be entitled to receive any dividend equivalent payments pursuant to this provision. Moreover,
if the Optionee exercises any portion of the Option, the Optionee will no longer be entitled to receive dividend equivalent payments
with respect to the portion of the Option exercised by the Optionee. Finally, if any portion of the Option that is outstanding
and vested terminates without being exercised by the Optionee, the Optionee will no longer be eligible to receive any dividend
equivalent payments with respect to such portion of the Option.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Jean Slack Lockhart, in her capacities as 

Trustee of the Lockhart Family Bypass 

Trust and as Independent Executor of the 

Estate of Warren L. Lockhart,

 

 Appellant,

v.

Chisos Minerals, LLC et al.,

 Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00153-CV

Appeal from the

118th District Court

of Howard County, Texas 

(TC# 52663)

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Appellant's motion for leave to file a response to Appellee's 

sur-reply brief. The motion for leave is granted, and Appellant’s response has this day been filed. 

No further briefing from any party will be considered.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of November, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Case 3:10-cv-01132-PGS-DEA Document 35 Filed 12/13/10 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 304
Case 3:10-cv-01132-PGS-DEA Document 35 Filed 12/13/10 Page 2 of 15 PageID: 305
Case 3:10-cv-01132-PGS-DEA Document 35 Filed 12/13/10 Page 3 of 15 PageID: 306
Case 3:10-cv-01132-PGS-DEA Document 35 Filed 12/13/10 Page 4 of 15 PageID: 307
Case 3:10-cv-01132-PGS-DEA Document 35 Filed 12/13/10 Page 5 of 15 PageID: 308
Case 3:10-cv-01132-PGS-DEA Document 35 Filed 12/13/10 Page 6 of 15 PageID: 309
Case 3:10-cv-01132-PGS-DEA Document 35 Filed 12/13/10 Page 7 of 15 PageID: 310
Case 3:10-cv-01132-PGS-DEA Document 35 Filed 12/13/10 Page 8 of 15 PageID: 311
Case 3:10-cv-01132-PGS-DEA Document 35 Filed 12/13/10 Page 9 of 15 PageID: 312
Case 3:10-cv-01132-PGS-DEA Document 35 Filed 12/13/10 Page 10 of 15 PageID: 313
Case 3:10-cv-01132-PGS-DEA Document 35 Filed 12/13/10 Page 11 of 15 PageID: 314
Case 3:10-cv-01132-PGS-DEA Document 35 Filed 12/13/10 Page 12 of 15 PageID: 315
Case 3:10-cv-01132-PGS-DEA Document 35 Filed 12/13/10 Page 13 of 15 PageID: 316
Case 3:10-cv-01132-PGS-DEA Document 35 Filed 12/13/10 Page 14 of 15 PageID: 317
Case 3:10-cv-01132-PGS-DEA Document 35 Filed 12/13/10 Page 15 of 15 PageID: 318
Presidential Documents

4341 

Federal Register 

Vol. 74, No. 14 

Friday, January 23, 2009 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8343 of January 20, 2009 

National Day of Renewal And Reconciliation, 2009 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

As I take the sacred oath of the highest office in the land, I am humbled 

by the responsibility placed upon my shoulders, renewed by the courage 

and decency of the American people, and fortified by my faith in an awesome 

God. 

We are in the midst of a season of trial. Our Nation is being tested, and 

our people know great uncertainty. Yet the story of America is one of 

renewal in the face of adversity, reconciliation in a time of discord, and 

we know that there is a purpose for everything under heaven. 

On this Inauguration Day, we are reminded that we are heirs to over two 

centuries of American democracy, and that this legacy is not simply a 

birthright—it is a glorious burden. Now it falls to us to come together 

as a people to carry it forward once more. 

So in the words of President Abraham Lincoln, let us remember that: ‘‘The 

mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave 

to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet 

swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will 

be, by the better angels of our nature.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States 

of America, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws 

of the United States, do hereby proclaim January 20, 2009, a National Day 

of Renewal and Reconciliation, and call upon all of our citizens to serve 

one another and the common purpose of remaking this Nation for our 

new century. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
4342 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 14 / Friday, January 23, 2009 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day 

of January, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third. 

[FR Doc. E9–1677 

Filed 1–22–09; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3195–W9–P 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICESOB#1.EPS</GPH>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-31121

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CARLOS GALVAN-LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:13-CR-121-1

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos GalvanLopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Galvan-Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 6, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-31121 Document: 00512619475 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/06/2014
No. 13-31121

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-31121 Document: 00512619475 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/06/2014