alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        As of July 15, 2009, the Secretary of the Treasury gives public notice that all outstanding 11                        3/4                         percent Treasury Bonds of 2009-14 (CUSIP No. 912810 DN 5) dated November 15, 1984, due November 15, 2014, are called for redemption at par on November 15, 2009, on which date interest on such bonds will cease.                    

# DATES:

Treasury calls such bonds for redemption on November 15, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Definitives Section, Customer Service Branch 3, Office of Retail Securities, Bureau of the Public Debt, (304) 480-7711.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    1.                     *Bonds Held in Registered Form.*                     Owners of such bonds held in registered form should mail bonds for redemption directly to: Bureau of the Public Debt, Definitives Section, Customer Service Branch 3, P.O. Box 426, Parkersburg, WV 26106-0426. Owners of such bonds will find further information regarding how owners must present and surrender such bonds for redemption under this call, in Department of the Treasury Circular No. 300 dated March 4, 1973, as amended (31 CFR part 306); by contacting the Definitives Section, Customer Service Branch 3, Office of Retail Securities, Bureau of the Public Debt, telephone number (304) 480-7711; and by going to the Bureau of the Public Debt's Web site,                     *http://www.treasurydirect.gov.*

                    2.                     *Bonds Held in Book-Entry Form.*                     Treasury automatically will make redemption payments for such bonds held in book-entry form, whether on the books of the Federal Reserve Banks or in Treasury Direct accounts, on November 15, 2009.                

Richard L. Gregg,

Acting Fiscal Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-16773 Filed 7-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-40-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Hon. Jose L. Linares
v. : Crim. No. 11-353 (JLL)
BAHADIR YAHSI z ORDER _FOR CONTINUANCE

This matter having come before the Court on the joint
application of Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the
District of New Jersey (Shirley U. Emehelu, Assistant U.S.
Attorney, appearing), and defendant BAHADIR YAHSI(Catherine M.
Brown, Esq., appearing), for an order granting a continuance of
the proceedings in the above-captioned matter, and the defendant
being aware that he has the right to have the matter brought to
trial within 70 days of the date of his appearance before a
judicial officer of this court pursuant to Title 18, United
States Code, Section 3161(c) (1), and the defendant having
consented to such a continuance, and it appearing that the
defendant waives such right, and for good and sufficient cause
shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should
be continued for the following reasons:

(1) The discovery in this case involves numerous audio
and video recordings that defense counsel requires adequate time

to review;


(2) Taking into account the exercise of diligence,
therefore, the facts of this case require that defense counsel be
permitted a reasonable amount of additional time for effective
preparation in this matter;

(3) As a result of the foregoing, pursuant to Title 18,
United States Code, Section 3161(h) (7), the ends of justice
served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interest of
the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS, therefore, on this day of November, 2011,

ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, continued
until February 29, 2012; and it is further

ORDERED that trial in this matter is scheduled for

wo be PEGE Cif rence et foc Jay El -

ORDERED that the period from the date of this order

through and including February 29, 2012 shall be excludable in

computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974.

HON. /JOSE L. LINARES
Uniféd States District Judge


Form and entry
consented to:

4

whitey Cthe belay
SHIRLEY U. EMEHELU
Assistant U.S. Attorney

GO2> a, fo

CATHERINE M. BROWN, ESQ. :
Counsel for defendant Bahadir Yahsi
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MattMar Minerals Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sean
Mitchell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
11th day of January, 2008.


/s/ Sean Mitchell
-----------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2008 (the “Report”) of Pegasi Energy Resources Corporation (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Michael Neufeld, as the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations of
the Registrant.






August
      13, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Michael
      NeufeldMichael
      NeufeldChief
      Executive Officer






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

      ( print page 34365)    
                    Notice is hereby given that, on June 10, 2009, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et**seq.*                     (“the Act”), Advanced Media Workflow Association Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Florical Systems, Gainesville, FL; StorerTV, Mequon, WI; Matt Beard (individual member), Maud, UNITED KINGDOM; and John Luff (individual member), Sewickley, PA have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Digital Vision, London, UNITED KINGDOM; Nielsen, Westport, CT; SecurePath Technology LLC, Los Angeles, CA; and Rick Turbeville (individual member), Waynesboro, VA have withdrawn as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Advanced Media Workflow Association Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. 

                    On March 28, 2000, Advanced Media Workflow Association Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 24, 2009. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 24, 2009 (74 FR 18748).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. E9-16699 Filed 7-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Splinternet Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:  August
      14, 2008


By: /s/
      James
      C. Ackerly


James
      C.
      Ackerly


Chief
      Executive Officer and
      President


(Principal
      Executive Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 

 :

RICKY LEE MENNEN, :

 :

Petitioner, :

 :

v. :

 :

DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, :

:

 Respondent. :

 :

Civil Action No. 11-1794 (JBS)

O R D E R

For the reasons set forth in this Court’s Opinion filed

herewith,

It is on this 13th day of January , 2012;

ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, is hereby dismissed; and it is

further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall close this case.

 s/ Jerome B. Simandle 

JEROME B. SIMANDLE

Chief, U.S. District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01794-JBS Document 9 Filed 01/13/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 149
Case 3:11-cr-00268-MLC Document 20 Filed 04/27/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 54
Case 3:11-cr-00268-MLC Document 20 Filed 04/27/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 55
EX-10.21



 Exhibit 10.21 
 First Amendment to that 
 Certain Employment Agreement 

by and between Tronox LLC and 
 Thomas J. Casey, dated April 19, 2012 
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (“Amendment”)
is made and entered into as of February 22, 2013 (“Effective Date”), and amends the Employment Agreement dated April 19, 2012 (the “Agreement”) between Tronox LLC (“Tronox” or “Company”) and Thomas
J. Casey. (“Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to amend the Agreement effective February 22, 2013, under the terms
and conditions of this Amendment, 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein and other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 4(f) of the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following new Section 4(f): 


“4(f) Equity Awards. In each year of the Employment Period, the Executive shall be granted a number of shares of restricted
stock or restricted stock units (or, to the extent the Equity Incentive Plan restricts the grant of restricted stock units, another form of equity award with an equivalent grant date fair value) under the Equity Incentive Plan with a value equal to
not less than $3,000,000, with such number of shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units (or equivalent award) to be calculated based upon the volume-weighted average price of the Company’s stock over the thirty (30)-day period
preceding the date of grant (the “Annual Equity Award”). For the 2013 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter during the Employment Period, the Company shall grant the Annual Equity Award on the date that is the earlier of
(x) the date on which the Company makes equity grants to its other executive officers and (y) last business day of March for the applicable year. The terms and conditions applicable to any Annual Equity Award shall be determined by the
Committee in accordance with the Company’s applicable long-term incentive plan.” 
  

	 	2.	Except as modified by this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of any conflict between the
Agreement and this Amendment, this Amendment Two shall prevail. 

 Signature Page Follows 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment by their duly authorized representatives, as of
the date first written hereinabove. 
  

									
	Tronox LLC:	 		 	Thomas J. Casey
			
	 /s/ Michael J. Foster
	 		 	 /s/ Thomas J. Casey

	By:	 	Michael J. Foster	 		 		 	
	Title:	 	 Senior Vice President,
 General
Counsel & Secretary
	 		 		 	
					
	Date:	 	February 22, 2013	 		 	Date:	 	February 22, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

JINPAN INTERNATIONAL (USA), 

LIMITED

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C.W.D. INC., CAUSEWAY 

WAREHOUSE & DISTRIBUTION,

INC., JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 

1-10; ABC CORPORATIONS 1-3

Defendants. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action No. 11-02834 (SDW)

ORDER

November 3, 2011

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of 

United States Magistrate Judge Madeline C. Arleo filed September 27, 2011, regarding 

Plaintiff’s motion to remand the instant action for fees and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447 

(Dkt. No. 4). No objections to the R&R were filed.

The Court has reviewed the R&R and the briefs and documents on file in this matter. 

Based on the foregoing, and for good cause shown, 

IT IS, on this 3rd day of November, 2011, 

ORDERED that the R&R of Magistrate Judge Arleo as set forth on the record on 

September 27, 2011, is ADOPTED by this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion to remand is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.

Case 2:11-cv-02834-SDW -MCA Document 15 Filed 11/03/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 257
s/ Susan D. Wigenton, U.S.D.J.

cc: Clerk

Magistrate Judge Madeline C. Arleo

Case 2:11-cv-02834-SDW -MCA Document 15 Filed 11/03/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 258
**Exhibit 12.2**

 

**CFO SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Thelma G. Oribello, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of PSi Technologies Holdings, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of thecompany’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financialreporting; and 

 

5. The company’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): 

 

a) All significant deficienciesand weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GERARDO GOMEZ SALGADO;

ESTHER FRANCO DE GOMEZ,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

Nos. 06-71665

 06-73051

Agency Nos. A077-843-790

 A077-843-791

MEMORANDUM *

On Petitions for Review of Orders of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 5, 2010** 

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. 

In these consolidated petitions, Gerardo Gomez Salgado and Esther Franco

de Gomez, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion

FILED

APR 13 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 06-73051

to reopen removal proceedings, and their subsequent motion to reconsider. We

have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion

the denial of a motion to reopen and reconsider. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d

785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petitions for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioners’ motion to

reopen, because the BIA considered the evidence they submitted and acted within

its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant

reopening. See Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (The BIA’s

denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only if it is “arbitrary, irrational or

contrary to law.”). 

The BIA was within its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to

reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the

BIA’s prior decision denying their motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1);

Socop-Gonzalez v. INS, 272 F.3d 1176, 1180 n.2 (9th Cir. 2001) (en banc). 

Construed as a second motion to reopen, the BIA correctly determined that the

motion was barred by the regulatory limitations on motions to reopen. See 8

C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). 

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

[GLJ LOGO GRAPHIC]

Gilbert Laustsen Jung
Associates Ltd. Petroleum Consultants
4100, 400 - 3rd Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta,
Canada T2P 4H2 (403) 266-9500 Fax (403) 262-1855







                               LETTER OF CONSENT









TO:  Ivanhoe Energy Inc.




We hereby consent to the inclusion in the Form 10-K of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. for
2002, of our report dated February 19, 2003 on oil and gas reserves of Ivanhoe
Energy Inc. and subsidiaries.




                                                         Yours very truly,


                                                         GILBERT LAUSTSEN JUNG
                                                         ASSOCIATES LTD.


                                                         ORIGINALLY SIGNED BY


                                                         Wayne W. Chow, P. Eng.
                                                         Vice-President


Date:  February 26, 2003
Calgary, Alberta
CANADA
Case 3:11-cv-02565-AET -DEA Document 56 Filed 03/16/12 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 536
Case 3:11-cv-02565-AET -DEA Document 56 Filed 03/16/12 Page 2 of 17 PageID: 537
Case 3:11-cv-02565-AET -DEA Document 56 Filed 03/16/12 Page 3 of 17 PageID: 538
Case 3:11-cv-02565-AET -DEA Document 56 Filed 03/16/12 Page 4 of 17 PageID: 539
Case 3:11-cv-02565-AET -DEA Document 56 Filed 03/16/12 Page 5 of 17 PageID: 540
Case 3:11-cv-02565-AET -DEA Document 56 Filed 03/16/12 Page 6 of 17 PageID: 541
Case 3:11-cv-02565-AET -DEA Document 56 Filed 03/16/12 Page 7 of 17 PageID: 542
Case 3:11-cv-02565-AET -DEA Document 56 Filed 03/16/12 Page 8 of 17 PageID: 543
Case 3:11-cv-02565-AET -DEA Document 56 Filed 03/16/12 Page 9 of 17 PageID: 544
Case 3:11-cv-02565-AET -DEA Document 56 Filed 03/16/12 Page 10 of 17 PageID: 545
Case 3:11-cv-02565-AET -DEA Document 56 Filed 03/16/12 Page 11 of 17 PageID: 546
Case 3:11-cv-02565-AET -DEA Document 56 Filed 03/16/12 Page 12 of 17 PageID: 547
Case 3:11-cv-02565-AET -DEA Document 56 Filed 03/16/12 Page 13 of 17 PageID: 548
Case 3:11-cv-02565-AET -DEA Document 56 Filed 03/16/12 Page 14 of 17 PageID: 549
Case 3:11-cv-02565-AET -DEA Document 56 Filed 03/16/12 Page 15 of 17 PageID: 550
Case 3:11-cv-02565-AET -DEA Document 56 Filed 03/16/12 Page 16 of 17 PageID: 551
Case 3:11-cv-02565-AET -DEA Document 56 Filed 03/16/12 Page 17 of 17 PageID: 552