alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SPAULDING v. PARRY NAVIGATION CO., Inc. (TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION, Third-Party Defendant).

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Feb. 21, 1950.

See also, 90 F.Supp. 564, 567.

*291Benjamin B. Sterling, New York City (Marvin Schwartz, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Irving L. Evans, New York City, for Parry Navigation Co., Inc.

John J. Kirwan, New York City (Leo F. Hanan, New York City, of counsel), for Todd Shipyards Corporation.

CONGER, District Judge.

The third party defendant herein, Todd Shipyards Corporation, has moved for leave to make Lamport & Holt Line, Ltd. a party to this action. Application is made pursuant to rule 14 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

Motion is denied.

This application is within the jurisdiction of the Court. General Taxicab Ass’n v. O’Shea, 71 App.D.C. 327, 109 F.2d 671; Moore’s Federal Practice, 2nd Edition, Page 414, Paragraph 14.05.

I denied the application because of the laches of the third party defendant. The action arises under the Jones Act, 46 U. S.C.A. § 688.

The accident to plaintiff occurred on or about August 14, 1947. The action was commenced against Parry Navigation Company, Inc. on September 15, 1947. The answer was served on October 5, 1947. On or about April, 1949 defendant Parry Navigation Company, Inc. impleaded as third party defendant Todd Shipyards Corporation, by motion.

On May 26, 1949 a deposition of an eyewitness to the accident was taken in San Francisco, California. The attorney for the plaintiff, the attorney for the defendant Parry Navigation Company, Inc., and the attorney for Todd Shipyards Corporation were present.

On January 11, 1950 depositions of other witnesses were taken on which occasion attorney for Todd Shipyards Corporation was present.

This motion was originally returnable on February 14, 1950 but was adjourned until today, February 21, 1950. The case was placed on the calendar on October 5, 1947 and appeared on the reserve calendar in the latter part of the year 1948. On January 23, 1950 the case was on the day calendar, No. 19. During the week of February 6, 1950 the case was near the top of the calendar. On Thursday, February 9, 1950 the case was No. 3 on the day calendar. On February 10, 1950 Todd Shipyards Corporation served the motion papers to implead.

The case is now No. 2 on the calendar and is awaiting assignment to a trial part. It may be reached at any time now.

The impleading of this third party defendant will greatly delay the trial. For that reason I feel I should not grant the motion.
Ex 10b16 2012 10-K






EXHIBIT 10(b)15


BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


ALABAMA POWER COMPANY


The following are the annual base salaries, effective March 1, 2013, of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Alabama Power Company and certain other executive officers of Alabama Power Company who served during 2012.


	
		
	Charles D. McCrary
President and Chief Executive Officer
	$803,247

	Philip C. Raymond
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, 
and Treasurer
	$301,666

	Theodore J. McCullough 
Senior Vice President
	$241,497

	Zeke W. Smith 
Executive Vice President
	$297,718

	Steven R. Spencer 
Executive Vice President
	$454,871
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

19. Persons at work in agriculture and nonagricultural industries by hours of work

[Numbers in thousands]

Hours of work

2011

Persons at work Percent distribution

All

industries

Agriculture

and related

industries

Nonagricultural

industries

All

industries

Agriculture

and related

industries

Nonagricultural

industries

Total, persons at work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134,879 2,162 132,717 100.0 100.0 100.0

1 to 34 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,898 627 34,271 25.9 29.0 25.8

1 to 4 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,516 50 1,466 1.1 2.3 1.1

5 to 14 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,426 150 5,275 4.0 7.0 4.0

15 to 29 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,223 290 16,933 12.8 13.4 12.8

30 to 34 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,733 136 10,597 8.0 6.3 8.0

35 hours and over. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99,981 1,535 98,446 74.1 71.0 74.2

35 to 39 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,528 100 9,428 7.1 4.6 7.1

40 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57,064 603 56,461 42.3 27.9 42.5

41 hours and over. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,389 832 32,557 24.8 38.5 24.5

41 to 48 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,449 137 11,312 8.5 6.4 8.5

49 to 59 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,913 248 12,665 9.6 11.5 9.5

60 hours and over. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,027 447 8,580 6.7 20.7 6.5

Average hours, total at work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38.3 41.7 38.2 – – –

Average hours, persons who usually work full time. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42.4 48.2 42.3 – – –

NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data. Dash indicates no data or data that do not meet publication criteria (values not

shown where base is less than 35,000).

1
Hon Stanley R. Chesler

CONSENT ORDER MODIFYING

LANCE POWELL, : CODITX0NS OP DEFENDANT’S

a/k/a “Lace” RtEASE

This matter having come before the Court on consent, Paul

Caste1eiro Esq. on behalf of the defendant Lance Powell, Paul J.

Fishman, United States Attorney for the District of New Jer8ey,

by Shirley LT. Emehelu, Assistant U. S. Attorney, on behalf of the

United States, for an Order modifyiri the conditions of the

defendant’s releaBe, and for good cause having been shown,

IT IS hereby on thisSi day offll2O:L2,

ORDERED that the electronic monitoring of the defendant

shall end at 20O a..tn. on June 1, 2012 on condition that the

defendant tbn leave with Andre Eentley within a reasonable time

thereafter to travel to Hopewell, Virginia where he is to report

by noon on June 4, 2012 to the Federal Correctional Institution,

Petersburg Medium, Hopewell, Virginia 23860 to begin serving his

sentence ; it is further

ORDERED that Mr. Powell is to call Pretrial Services once

each day on Friday, June 1, Saturday, June 2, Sunday, Jime 3, and

Monday, June 4, 2012; it is further

ORDERED that if Mr Powell does not leave with Mr. entley

to travel to Hopewell, Virginia on Friday, June 1, 2012 by 8:00
LE STANLEY R. CHESLER

United State3 District Judge

Form and. entry

consented to

Attorney for de

2
NEW YORK BAR

May30, 2012

Via Facsimjie_973-645-31 77

Theresa Trivino

Courtroom Deputy

Hon. Stanley R. Chesler, L).S.D.J.US. Post Office & Courthouse BIdg, Room 417

Newark, NJ 07101

Re; United States v Lance Powell

Grim, No 11-417 (SRC)

Dear Ms. Trivino:

Attached please find proposed Consent Order Modifying Conditions of

Defendant’s Release in the above referenced matter for Judge Chesler’s

consideration signed by bath Shirley Emehelu 1Assistant U.S. Attorney and, and

myself. Earlier this afternoon my secretary mistakenly faxed to you this proposed

order which was not signed by Ms. Emehelu,

Please note that this Order is time sensitive and if it is to be signed by the

Judge it must be entered no later than tomorrow.

If you should have any questions please do not hesitate to call me,

PC:ca

Attachmentcc: Shirley Emehelu, AUSA, vla email
Exhibit 31.1





Certification of Chief
Executive Officer





I, Peter J. Dalton, certify
that:





1.   I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Globalstar, Inc.;and





2.   Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.








Date:
                November
      10, 2010By:
                /s/
      Peter J. DaltonPeter
      J. DaltonChief
      Executive Officer
H. Res. 905 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 19, 2020. 

Resolved, That House Resolution 891, agreed to March 

11, 2020, is amended— 

(1) in section 7, by striking ‘‘March 22, 2020’’ and 

inserting ‘‘March 29, 2020’’; 

(2) in section 10, by striking ‘‘March 22, 2020’’ 

and inserting ‘‘March 29, 2020’’; and 

(3) in section 11, by striking ‘‘March 23, 2020’’ 

and inserting ‘‘March 30, 2020’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
September 2, 1997

Gaylord Receivables Corporation
1013 Centre Road, Suite 350
Wilmington, DE  19805
Attention:  Catherine A. Curran

Gaylord Container Corporation
500 Lake Cook Road
Suite 400 Deerfield, Illinois  60015
Attention:  Catherine A. Curran

   Re:  Extension Request   Revolving Credit Agreement

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     Reference is hereby made to that certain Revolving Credit Agreement dated 
as of September 24, 1993 among Gaylord Receivables Corporation, Various 
Financial Institutions and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as Facility Agent 
and as Collateral Agent (the "Agreement").  Capitalized terms not otherwise 
used herein shall have the same meaning as ascribed to them in the Agreement.

     GRC has notified the Facility Agent of its desire to extend the Scheduled 
Commitment Termination Date by July 1, 1999 to July 3, 2000 pursuant to 
Section 3.03(b) of the Agreement.  Please be advised that the Facility Agent 
has notified each Lender of such extension request.  

     Please be further advised that pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Agreement 
that the Facility Agent hereby notifies GRC and S & P of the decisions of all 
of the Lenders to grant the request of GRC to extend the Scheduled Commitment 
Termination Date to July 3, 2000.  Therefore, pursuant to Section 3.03 of the 
Agreement, the Scheduled Commitment Termination Date is hereby extended to 
July 3, 2000.

<PAGE>
Gaylord Receivables Corporation
Gaylord Container Corporation
September 2, 1997
Page 2


If you have questions, please contact me at (312) 461-6780.
                             
                                           Very truly yours,
                                                          
                                           Harris Trust and Savings Bank,
                                           as Facility Agent
                                                          
                                           By  /s/ John M. Dillon
                                               ------------------
                                               John M. Dillon
                                               Vice President
                             
cc:           Standard & Poors
              Harris Trust and Savings Bank
              Banco Di Napoil SpA
              Caisse Nationale De Credit Agricole
              Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (a)
    
    our periodic report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010
(the Form 10-K), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related interpretations; and(b)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and our results of operations.
  By:
    
    /s/ Gerald D. Schiefelbein

Gerald D. SchiefelbeinChief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    March 16, 2011
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 :

UNITED STATES SOCIAL SECURITY : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-2928 (MLC)

ADMINISTRATION and NEAL PRASAD, :

 :

Plaintiffs, : O P I N I O N

 :

v. :

 :

JAMES MCVAUGH, et al., :

 :

Defendants. :

 :

THE PLAINTIFF NEAL PRASAD, who is pro se, brought this action

(1) asserting a qui tam claim pursuant to the False Claims Act

(“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3730, for fraudulent collection of Social

Security disability benefits, and (2) to recover damages under

state law for tortious interference with business relations,

tortious interference with prospective economic advantage,

defamation, and false light. (See dkt. entry no. 1, Compl.)

THE COURT, in a Notice dated January 29, 2013, advised

Prasad that (1) he had failed to prosecute the action for more

than 120 days, and (2) the claims would be dismissed on February

20, 2013, without further notice in accordance with Local Civil

Rule 41.1 unless, inter alia, he resumed prosecution of the

action. (See dkt. entry no. 12, Notice.)

THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY has notified the

Court that the United States declines to intervene in the action. 

(See dkt. entry no. 13, Notice of Declination.)
PRASAD has failed to contact the Court, even though the time

to do so has long expired. The Court also notes that Prasad, as

a pro se plaintiff, is not authorized to pursue a qui tam claim

when the United States declines to intervene. See United States

ex rel. Mergent Servs. v. Flaherty, 540 F.3d 89, 93-94 (2d Cir.

2008); United States ex rel. Fisher v. Network Software Assocs.,

377 F.Supp.2d 195, 196-97 (D.D.C. 2005). The Court thus intends

to dismiss the Complaint for lack of prosecution. For good cause

appearing, the Court will issue an appropriate order and

judgment.

 s/ Mary L. Cooper 

MARY L. COOPER

United States District Judge

Dated: May 9, 2013

2
Case 2:11-cr-00315-WHW Document 13 Filed 05/18/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 61
Case 2:11-cr-00315-WHW Document 13 Filed 05/18/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 62
Case 2:11-cr-00315-WHW Document 13 Filed 05/18/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 63
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hasaun Grigger, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 721]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 17, 1997 *(People v Grigger,*244 AD2d 501 [1997]), affirming two judgments of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, both rendered August 3, 1995.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz, 2*NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, PJ., Florio, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.
----

| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |   |                             |   |
|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      May 20, 2008 | By:    | /s/      Michael McLaren         |   |
|                    |   | Michael      McLaren             |   |
|                    |   | Principal      Financial Officer |   |
|                    |   |                             |   |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5147 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5147

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2004

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 23055 Sherman Way in West Hills, California, as the ``Evan Asa 
                    Ashcraft Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 23055 
Sherman Way in West Hills, California, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Evan Asa Ashcraft Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Evan Asa Ashcraft Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 102 Filed 04/14/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1336
Case 3:09-cr-00695-PGS Document 27 Filed 11/17/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 49
34868 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 136 / Friday, July 17, 2009 / Notices 

at a card reader. The access record also 

includes the individual’s biographic 

information (full legal name, date of 

birth, and Social Security Number) and 

biometric information (fingerprints, 

digital color photograph, height, weight, 

and eye/hair color).’’ 

* * * * * 

RETRIEVABILITY: 

Description of change: Remove 

current entry and in its place add the 

following: ‘‘Information on individuals 

can be retrieved by name or card 

number or other assigned identifier such 

as biometric or biographic information.’’ 

* * * * * 

Dated: July 13, 2009. 

Elizabeth Cuffe, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Privacy and 

Treasury Records. 

[FR Doc. E9–17132 Filed 7–16–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–39–P 

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 

Meeting; Sunshine Act 

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: 

Tennessee Valley Authority (Meeting 

No. 09–04). 

TIME AND DATE: 3 p.m., July 21, 2009. 

TVA West Tower Auditorium, 400 West 

Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, TN. 

STATUS: Open. 

Agenda 

Action on the following New Business 

1. Selection of Senior Vice President, 

Communications. 

2. Kingston Report. 

FOR MORE INFORMATION: Please call TVA 

Media Relations at (865) 632–6000, 

Knoxville, Tennessee. People who plan 

to attend the meeting and have special 

needs should call (865) 632–6000. 

Anyone who wishes to comment on any 

of the agenda in writing may send their 

comments to: TVA Board of Directors, 

Board Agenda Comments, 400 West 

Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, 

Tennessee 37902. 

Dated: July 14, 2009. 

Maureen H. Dunn, 

General Counsel and Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–17141 Filed 7–15–09; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 8120–08–P 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to China
Healthcare Acquisition Corp., including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of China Healthcare Acquisition Corp.s
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in China Healthcare Acquisition
Corp.s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
China Healthcare Acquisition Corp.s most recent fiscal year that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
China Healthcare Acquisition Corp.s internal control over financial
reporting.
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect China
Healthcare Acquisition Corp.s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a
significant role in China Healthcare Acquisition
Corp.s internal controls over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 17, 2008
    /s/ Alwin TanAlwin Tan, Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6686

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RONALD EVANS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:06-cr-00162-RAJ-JEB-7)

Submitted: July 21, 2015 Decided: July 24, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott Capotosto, Joseph 

Evan DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorneys, Norfolk, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Ronald Evans appeals the district court’s orders denying his 

motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United 

States v. Evans, No. 2:06-cr-00162-RAJ-JEB-7 (E.D. Va. Mar. 16, 

2015); see also U.S Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.10(b)(2), 

p.s. (2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED