alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 17, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00145

- CV

INTEREST OF J.P,

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- PA

- 00980

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee ’ s Motion for Extension o f Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The

appellee ’ s brief is due on July 6, 2015.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of June, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Mr. Abel Acosta/ Clerk.

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS.

P.O. Box 12308

Austin, Texas 78711.

April 15, 2015.

RE: EX PARTE, FREDERICK DEWAYNE HUGHES.

Trial Court NO. W380-82593-2011-HC

WR-83,082-01

and

Trial Court NO. W380-82564-2011-HC

WR-83,082-02

$3 ,m -b[PL

RECEIVED \H

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APR 22 2015

Abel Acosta,Clark

Greetings:

For an unknown reason, Collin County District Clerk's Office has declined to

release information regarding the filing date of my applications for habeas re

lief and has provided no copies of documents filed by other parties. Thus, I

have no idea of what documents, and, if a complete record was forwarded to your

office. This concern derives from previous experiences and unprofessional prac

tices on conducting business by that county.

This is a consolidated proceeding. Two cases were consolidated for trial, re

sulting in two habeas applications for which consolidation was requested in a

written form. It contains a number of attachments, including written objections

to proposed findings of fact and order.

If not much to ask, would you, please, provide me with an itemized list of

the instruments delivered to your office by Collin County District Clerk in

connection with the above referenced action.

Your assistance in this matter will be profoundly appreciated.

). Hughes/ #1821493.

Michael Unit, 2664 FM 2054

Tennessee Colony, Texas 75886.
Case 3:11-mj-05017-TJB   Document 79   Filed 05/11/11   Page 1 of 1 PageID: 161
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before August 14, 2009 to be assured of consideration. 

## Internal Revenue Service (IRS) 

*OMB Number:*                     1510-0073.                 

*Type of Review:*                     Extension.                 

*Form:*                     111.                 

*Title:*                     ETA Financial Agency Agreement.                 

*Description:*                     This application will collect a financial institution's identifying information, confirm a financial institution's commitment to offering the ETA, identify a point of contact for the ETA Program and determine date when institutions will offer ETAs.                 

*Respondents:*                     Businesses or other for-profits.                 

*Estimated Total Burden Hours:*                     10 hours.                 

*Clearance Officer:*                     Wesley Powe (202) 874-7662, Financial Management Service, Room 135, 3700 East West Highway, Hyattsville, MD 20782.                 

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Shagufta Ahmed (202) 395-7873, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                 

Celina Elphage, 

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.

 [FR Doc. E9-16789 Filed 7-14-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF THE

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Eric Johnson, the CEO of First Responder Products Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of First Responder Products Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of First Responder Products Inc.



|                     |  |                                  
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|Date: March 15, 2007 |  | /s/ Eric Johnson                 
|                     |  | Eric Johnson                     
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer/President
|                     |  |                                  







I, Richard Reincke, the CFO of First Responder Products Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of First Responder Products Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of First Responder Products Inc.





|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 15, 2007 |  | /s/ Richard Reincke    
|                     |  | Richard Reincke        
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                     |  |
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regal Rock, Inc. (the  "Company")  on
Form  10-QSB  for  the period ended August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

   1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:  October 13, 2006


/s/ Bruce Biles
-------------------------------------------
Bruce Biles, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
Case 3:10-cv-04008-MAS-TJB Document 28-2 Filed 11/23/10 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 173
Case 3:10-cv-04008-MAS-TJB Document 28-2 Filed 11/23/10 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 174
Case 3:10-cv-04008-MAS-TJB Document 28-2 Filed 11/23/10 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 175
Case 3:10-cv-04008-MAS-TJB Document 28-2 Filed 11/23/10 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 176
Case 3:11-cr-00482-JAP Document 1 Filed 07/14/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 1
Case 3:11-cr-00482-JAP Document 1 Filed 07/14/11 Page 2 of 8 PageID: 2
Case 3:11-cr-00482-JAP Document 1 Filed 07/14/11 Page 3 of 8 PageID: 3
Case 3:11-cr-00482-JAP Document 1 Filed 07/14/11 Page 4 of 8 PageID: 4
Case 3:11-cr-00482-JAP Document 1 Filed 07/14/11 Page 5 of 8 PageID: 5
Case 3:11-cr-00482-JAP Document 1 Filed 07/14/11 Page 6 of 8 PageID: 6
Case 3:11-cr-00482-JAP Document 1 Filed 07/14/11 Page 7 of 8 PageID: 7
Case 3:11-cr-00482-JAP Document 1 Filed 07/14/11 Page 8 of 8 PageID: 8
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.08

                                  ZymeTx, Inc.
                         800 Research Parkway, Suite 100
                             Oklahoma City, OK 73104
                       (405) 271-1314 Fax: (405) 271-1944

December 26, 2001

Mr. Mike D. Morgan
Vice President of Business Operations
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
825 Northeast 13th Street
Oklahoma City, OK 73104

Dear Mr. Morgan:

With reference to your letter dated December 12, 2001, and OMRF's continuing
waiver of default on ZymeTx's past due notes payable, we propose the following:
ZymeTx will provide OMRF with a note payable in the amount of $51,390.45, which
will make us current on our past due payments. We also propose to add to the
note outstanding royalties due OMRF as of December 31, 2001 (approximately
$20,000). The note will be be dated December 31, 2001, bear interest at twelve
per cent and be payable on May 31, 2002. We will also issue a warrant for each
dollar of the note payable for the purchase of ZymeTx common stock at an
exercise price of $.30 per share. The warrants will expire on December 31, 2006.

Please indicate your acceptance of our proposal and we will execute the note and
issue the warrants by January 15, 2002.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Fred E. Hiller

Fred E. Hiller
Chief Financial Officer


ACCEPTED BY:   NAME   Mike D. Morgan
                      --------------

               TITLE  Vice President of Business Operations
                      -------------------------------------

SIGNATURE /s/ Mike D. Morgan   Date 12/26/01
          -------------------       --------
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Darrel Slack, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Centillium Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    DARREL
SLACKDarrel Slack Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




April 18, 2003
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 :

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS :

& ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-3640 (MLC)

711 HEALTH & WELFARE, VACATION, :

& FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE : O P I N I O N

FUNDS, et al., :

 :

Plaintiffs, :

 :

v. :

 :

CASTLE PAINTING, INC., :

 :

Defendant. :

 :

THE CLERK OF THE COURT entered default against the defendant

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 55(a). (See

unnumbered dk. entry following dkt. entry no. 5.) The plaintiff

moves under Rule 55(b) for entry of judgment by default against

the defendant. (Dkt. entry no. 6.) The motion is unopposed,

even though the return date was three weeks ago. (Id.) The

motion will be granted. For good cause appearing, the Court will

issue an appropriate order and judgment.

 s/ Mary L. Cooper 

MARY L. COOPER

United States District Judge

Dated: December 28, 2011

Case 3:11-cv-03640-MLC-DEA Document 8 Filed 12/28/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 99
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 65 Filed 10/07/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 575
Case 3:11-cv-03561-PGS-TJB Document 109 Filed 07/17/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 2147
Case 3:11-cv-03561-PGS-TJB Document 109 Filed 07/17/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2148
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document





































 



 
 

  EXHIBIT 10.12    
    


 
    Summary of Benjamin A. Pardo 2013 Compensation    
    


        The Knoll, Inc. compensation committee approved an annual base salary of $265,000 for Benjamin A. Pardo, with a bonus
target of $250,000. Mr. Pardo is also entitled to participate in the benefit plans provided by Knoll that are generally available to Knoll employees. 











QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.12


Summary of Benjamin A. Pardo 2013 Compensation
Case 2:11-cr-00310-JLL Document 43 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 272
NOT FOR PUBLICATION (Doc. Nos. 33, 34)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CAMDEN VICINAGE

____________________________________

:

U.S. CLAIMS :

:

Plaintiff, : Civil No. 11-02574 (RBK/JS)

:

v. : ORDER

:

LISA ROSS, et. al., :

:

Defendants. :

____________________________________ :

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the motions of Citibank, N.A. 

(“Citibank”) and Bank of America, N.A. (“BOA”) for summary judgment on Count 2 of the 

complaint of U.S. Claims (“Plaintiff”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, and the 

Court having considered the moving papers and attached documents; and for the reasons 

expressed in the Opinion issued this date;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Citibank and BOA’s motions for summary judgment 

on Count 2 of Plaintiff’s complaint are GRANTED. 

Dated: 12/4/2012 /s/ Robert B. Kugler 

 ROBERT B. KUGLER

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02574-RBK-JS Document 41 Filed 12/06/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 314
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16742]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5300-N-23]


Notice of Availability: Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for 
HUD's Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 HOPE VI Revitalization Grants Program

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian 
Housing, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HUD announces the availability on its Web site of the 
applicant information, submission deadlines, funding criteria and other 
requirements for HUD's HOPE VI Revitalization Program NOFA for FY 2009. 
Approximately $113 million is made available through this NOFA, to 
remain available until September 30, 2010, by the Department of Housing 
and Urban Development Appropriations Act, 2009 (Pub. L. 111-8, approved 
March 11, 2009) for HUD's HOPE VI Revitalization Program. The notice 
providing information regarding the application process, funding 
criteria and eligibility requirements is available on the Grants.gov 
Web site at https://apply07.grants.gov/apply/forms_apps_idx.html. A 
link to Grants.gov is also available on the HUD Web site at http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm. The Catalogue of Federal 
Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for the HOPE VI Revitalization 
Program is 14.866. Applications must be submitted electronically 
through Grants.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding specific program 
requirements should be directed to the agency contact identified in the 
program NOFA. Questions regarding the 2009 General section should be 
directed to the Office of Departmental Grants Management and Oversight 
at 202-708-0667 (this is not a toll-free number) or the NOFA 
Information Center at 1-800-HUD-8929 (toll-free). Persons with hearing 
or speech impairments may access these numbers via TTY by calling the 
Federal Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339.

    Dated: July 2, 2009.
Paula O. Blunt,
General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing.
 [FR Doc. E9-16742 Filed 7-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
Case 3:11-mj-02525-DEA   Document 36   Filed 06/09/14   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 82

Case 3:11-mj-02525-DEA   Document 36   Filed 06/09/14   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 83
- - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

ASTRAZENECA AB, AKTIEBOLAGET 

HÄSSLE, ASTRAZENECA LP, KBI INC., 

and KBI-E INC., 

Plaintiffs and 

Counterclaim-Defendants,

 v. 

HANMI USA, INC., HANMI 

PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., HANMI 

FINE CHEMICAL CO., LTD, and HANMI 

HOLDINGS CO., LTD., 

 

Defendants and 

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs. 

Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00760-JAP-TJB 

Judge Joel A. Pisano 

Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni 

DECLARATION OF PATRICK L. CHEN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ BRIEF IN 

SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO PRECLUDE DEFENDANTS FROM RELYING ON 

EVIDENCE OF EXPERIMENTS PERFORMED BY MR. BRACKEEN FOR WHICH 

SAMPLES AND DOCUMENTATION HAVE NOT BEEN PRODUCED 

I, Patrick L. Chen, hereby declare as follows, 

1. I am an associate at the law firm of Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, 1290 

Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10104-3800, counsel for Plaintiffs AstraZeneca

AB, Aktiebolaget Hässle, AstraZeneca LP, KBI Inc., and KBI-E Inc. in connection with the 

present action. 

2. I make this Declaration on my personal knowledge in support of Plaintiffs’ 

Motion in Limine to Preclude Defendants from Relying on Evidence of Experiments Performed 

by Mr. Brackeen for Which Samples and Documentation Have Not Been Produced. 

3. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the February 19, 2013 Expert 

Report of Marcus F. Brackeen. 

4. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the February 19, 2013 Expert 

Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB Document 287-2 Filed 04/29/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 10031
- - 2

Report of Jerry L. Atwood, Ph.D. 

5. Attached as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of the April 8, 2013 Reply Expert 

Report of Jerry L. Atwood, Ph.D. 

6. Attached as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the transcript of 

the April 26, 2013 deposition of Jerry L Atwood, Ph.D. 

7. Attached as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of the March 25, 2013 Rebuttal 

Expert Report of Stephen G. Davies, D.Phil. on Validity. 

8. Attached as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of the April 17, 2013 Sur-Reply 

Expert Report of Stephen G. Davies, D.Phil. Concerning Validity. 

9. Attached as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of a letter, and exhibits thereto, 

from John E. Flaherty, Esq. to Hon. Tonianne J. Bongiovanni, U.S.M.J. dated March 18, 2013 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: April 29, 2013 

Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB Document 287-2 Filed 04/29/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 10032
Liza M. Walsh

Rukhsanah L. Singh

CONNELL FOLEY LLP

85 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, New Jersey 07068

Telephone No.: (973) 535-0500

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., HOFFMANN-La 

ROCHE INC., F. HOFFMANN-La ROCHE 

LTD. and GENENTECH, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NATCO PHARMA LIMITED and NATCO 

PHARMA INC.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

C.A. No. 1:11-cv-01455-SDW-MCA

consolidated with

C.A. No. 2:11-cv-04969-SDW-MCA

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL

OF COUNSEL ADMITTED 

PRO HAC VICE

Electronically Filed

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Leora Ben-Ami of the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis LLP

hereby withdraws her pro hac vice admission on behalf of Plaintiffs in the above-captioned 

action and requests removal from all service lists.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Plaintiffs will continue to be represented by 

Connell Foley LLP, together with counsel from Sidley Austin LLP, to be admitted pro hac vice.

Dated: September 12, 2014 s/Liza M. Walsh

Liza M. Walsh

3222690-1

Case 2:11-cv-01455-SDW-SCM Document 93 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1347
#### Baltimore Car-Wheel Co. and others *v.*Bemis and others.

*(Circuit Court, D. Massachusetts.*

November 24, 1886.)

Patents for Inventions—Libel—Injunction.

There is no jurisdiction in the United States courts of equity to enjoin a libel on the rights or title of an owner of letters patent.

*Benjamin Price*and *William C. Williamson,*for complainants.

*Benjamin F. Thurston*and *Wilmarth H. Thurston,*for respondents.

Heard by Colt and Carpenter, JJ.

Carpenter, J.

This bill alleges that tho complainants are the owners of and licensees under certain letters patent for cars and car axle boxes, and that the respondents have falsely and maliciously published statements and written letters to the effect that the complainants have failed in a suit for infringement of said letters patent brought against the respondents; that the axle boxes and gear manufactured by the complainants are infringements of certain other letters patents owned by tho respondents; and that suits are about to be brought by the respondents, on account of such infringement, against the complainants, arid those who shall purchase and use their axle boxes and gears. The bill further alleges that, by reason of the said false statements, those who desire to purchase and use the apparatus made and sold by the complainants aro deterred from so doing through fear of litigation, and the business of the complainants is thereby injured; and prays for an injunction. To this bill respondents demur.

We think the demurrer is well founded. There is no jurisdiction in a court of equity to enjoin libel on the rights or title of the complainant. We understand this to be the settled law both in England and in this country, in the absence of statutory provisions conferring such jurisdiction. The question is so fully and clearly discussed in the leading decisions that we do no more than cite them. *Prudential Assur. Co.v. Knott,*L. R. 10 Ch. 142; *Boston Diatile Co.*v. *Florence Manuf’g Co.,*114 Mass. 69; *Kidd*v. *Horry,*28 Fed. Rep. 773.
#### STANLEY WORKS v. ROCKWELL MFG. CO.

Civ. A. No. 7290.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

Sept. 26, 1950.

T. Clay Lindsey, of Hartford, Conn., William G. Young, Christy, Parmelee & Strickland, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

William A. Strauch, of Washington, D. C., Davis C. Burroughs, Jr., Moorehead & Knox, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

BURNS, District Judge.

The primary basis of the objections of defendant to the interrogatories propounded by plaintiff is apparently the fear that answers to the questions asked might tend to accentuate what defendant considers to be less important facts. When it is recalled, however, that the function of interrogatories is to inform the parties in advance of trial, and not to serve as a substitute for the trial itself, the disposal of the rule on the instant objections becomes clear. Examination of the interrogatories, as amended, reveals that the information desired in those interrogatories may have relevance to the issues likely to arise at the trial of this case. Defendant has equal opportunity to insure adequate pretrial development of the case by itself resorting to cross-interrogatories and the other pretrial procedure permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. At the trial, neither party will be foreclosed from a full, developed presentation of its position.