alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S06Y0726.

#### IN THE MATTER OF MARK BENVENISTE.

(627 SE2d 3)

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court pursuant to the report of the Special Master who recommends acceptance of Respondent Mark Benveniste’s petition for voluntary surrender of license in *306which Benveniste admits that on September 12, 2003 he was sentenced in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia pursuant to jury convictions on one count of Bank Fraud in violation of 18 USC §§ 1344 and 2; 25 counts of False Statements or Reports in violation of 18 USC § 1014; four counts of Mail Fraud in violation of 18 USC § 1341; and two counts of Wire Fraud in violation of 18 USC § 1343, all felony violations of the United States Code, and that by virtue of these convictions he has violated Rule 8.4 (a) (2) of Bar Rule 4-102 (d), the maximum penalty for which is disbarment. Benveniste, who has been a member of the Bar since 1990, requested that he be allowed to voluntarily surrender his license to practice law and asserted that he understood that a voluntary surrender was tantamount to disbarment. The State Bar did not respond to Ben-veniste’s petition, but the special master considered the matter and recommends that the petition be accepted.

Decided February 27, 2006.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Gene Chapman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

We have reviewed the record and agree to accept Benveniste’s petition for the voluntary surrender of his license. Accordingly, the name of Mark Benveniste is hereby removed from the rolls of persons entitled to practice law in the State of Georgia. Benveniste is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Voluntary surrender of license accepted.*

*All the Justices concur.*
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Sean Mitchell, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MattMar Minerals
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
11th day of January, 2008.


/s/ Sean Mitchell
--------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Nag. No. Il-4059 (CCC)

JUAN MONTANEZ ORDER FOR I..ONTINUANCE

Th.is. matter havinc come before the Court on the joint

application of Paul J. Fishman., United States Atto.rney for the

District of New Jersey (Brooke S. Carey, Assistant US. Attorney,

appearing), and defendant Juan Montanez (Linda Foster, Esc,

appearing), for an order granting a second continuance of the

oroceedings in the abovecaptzoned matter for a period of 90 days

to permit defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for

effective preparation in this matter and to allow the parties toconduct pIca negotiations and attempt to finalize a plea

agreement, and the defendant being aware that the defendant hasthe right Lo have the matter submitted to a grand jury within

thirty days of the date of the defendant’s arrest, pursuant to

Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(b), and the defendant

havinc. consented to the continuance and waived such right, and

for good cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should

be continued for the following reasons:

(1) Plea negotiation.s are currently i.n progress, and

both the United States and the defendant desire additional time
C))

CC) N

(33

C)

LCDN

Lu

(N

(N

CD

C).

CD

(N

N)3

Lu.

Lu

C)

CD0

Lu

(N

CD

(3D

C)

(N

Li

CD

C)-

CD

C))

(N

(N

CC) N

CC)

C)) 0

C) 0

Lu3

CD.

C)) Lu

CC)

0

N) C)) o (N N CC) N

CC)

N) Li

CDC)3

C) C) Li

CC)

CL4

Lu

Lu 0

C)

Lu

N) C)

CDN

—3 CL) N

C))

Li. N)

C) N)

(N

Cl)

0 Li

N) Lu

F”

N) N)

N)

-N Li

CC)

CD

>)

C)

(N

Li

Lu

Li

N)

CD

C-”

C) 0

333

U)

Lu

(N

I-”

C)

C)

(NN

33

CD

C)

Li

CDN

(N

CD

(1)

Li

CD

CC)

Li

Lu (N

C) ... :i

Li Cl CD

N) Lu “CC. (N

U) Li F” CD N)

CO C-i

N) C)

o Cl) C) NC

Li Lu Li CC) -33 Lu

(C)N C)

Li (N

0 Li CC Li

Li Li N). :,) Li)

Li CD N)

- (N

Li

N a- CC) C)

C) (N CD rt (N Li

Li Li Li CD Li

Lu Lu C))

N CD

(N

< (N CC)

C

(0 N) CD

(N. (N

0 C) Li C-ti. Li N Li

CD

N C-” CD Lu o co - C))

Li 3333 (N

CD Lu

0

N Li C) C)

N

N- Lu• (N C) 0 3 (N

Li CD CD Li

C) F”

N) N) CC) C)) N Lu Li Li O - CD\J. CC)

33

-

CD

N) r-w. Li

Li CC) Luj (N

Lu _) .—,

C) Li (N

CD CL

N

(N Li C)) N)

() CD (N Lu CO N N) - Li CD 0

Lu Li N)

N) C) (N CD Lu Li C-—4 C)) N) Lu

N) (N C)) C)

CD:

(N N)

-

C)

N C) - C) CL)

C) C)

Lu N) (N .N)

C) C) C-” N)

CC: C)

—

C)) N) Lu

(N —. CD

Li

C.

Li

C):

CD
#### ATKINSON v. THOMPSON, Trustee for Missouri Pac. R. Co.

No. 6347.

United States District Court W. D. Missouri, W. D.

May 27, 1950.

Robert L. Robertson, Fred J. Freel, Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff.

Beeson & Dabbs, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant.

*259REEVES, Chief Judge.

By the above motion the defendant seeks to have the plaintiff state: “(1) At what place he was working * * * as well as the place of the occurrence and the facts surrounding the manner of the collision mentioned in paragraph 3 of the complaint * * * (2) in what way plaintiff was caused to suffer personal injuries; (3) upon what act or acts of omission or commission plaintiff will rely on the trial as constituting negligence of the defendant; (4) that plaintiff set forth the particular nature and extent of injuries claimed received.” These are requested because the defendant believes that the “complaint is so vague, indefinite and uncertain that he is unable to properly plead and prepare his defense.”

An inspection of the rules of evidence in the federal court disclose that the motion for a bill of particulars has been deleted. Where a motion for a more definite statement is the exact equivalent of a bill of particulars, then necessarily it should be treated as a motion for a bill of particulars.

Rule 8, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, 28 U.S.C.A., among other things, that the complaint shall contain “(2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, * * This is regarded as entirely sufficient except in cases where there are ambiguities or doubtful averments against which a motion for a more definite statement may he lodged. Turning to the Appendix of Forms to the New Rules, 28 U.S.C.A., in this Appendix the Supreme Court has furnished model pleadings; Form 1^ is a model complaint for negligence under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., and a reading of this form shows that the plaintiff followed it with considerable precision and exactness. It must, therefore, be deemed sufficient. The information sought by the defendant can he obtained under the discovery rules.

In view of the above, the motion for a more definite and certain statement should be and will be overruled.
Exhibit 13.1



LION BIOSCIENCE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of LION bioscience Aktiengesellschaft (the Company) on Form 20-F/A for the period ending
March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel Keesman, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2003 and results of
operations of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2003.



/s/    Dr. Daniel KeesmanName:

Dr. Daniel KeesmanTitle:

Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer




Date: April 20, 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

TYRICE GRIFFIN,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF 

PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 488 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**


In
      connection with the quarterly report of Associated Media Holdings, Inc. (the
      “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Darryl Franklin,
      Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Darryl Franklin


Darryl
      Franklin, (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer)








Dated: August
      20, 2007













28
EXHIBIT 32.1
                        COLLECTIBLE CONCEPTS GROUP, INC.
      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Collectible  Concepts  Group,  Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended February 28, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  Report),  I, Paul
Lipschutz,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Collectible Concepts Group, Inc. and will be retained by Collectible
Concepts Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.

Date:  October 20, 2005


 /s/ Paul Lipschutz
-----------------------
Paul Lipschutz
Chief Executive Officer
Case 2:11-cv-01210-SDW-MCA Document 9 Filed 02/28/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 141
Case 2:11-cv-01210-SDW-MCA Document 9 Filed 02/28/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 142
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7668

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARCUS MANDEL ELLIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-00-107; CA-03-2954-06-20) Submitted: February 19, 2004 De cided: February 26, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marcus Mandel Ellis, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).PER CURIAM: Marcus Ellis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ellis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
|                                         | 31.2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|---------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
|                                        
|I, Lisa Norman, certify that:           
|1.                                       | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Home Alliance Corporation.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|2.                                       | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.
|3.                                       | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results from operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.                





|By:  /s/Lisa NormanLisa Norman
Chief Financial Officer | Date:  October 11, 2011
|------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Crim. Action No. 11-310 (JLL)

V. ORDER

KOLE AKLNOLA

Defendant.

LINARES, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court by way of Defendant Kole Akinola (“Defendant”)’s

(1) motion to suppress evidence seized from a rental vehicle on April 27, 2011, and (2) motion to

suppress statements made during a telephone conversation on April 27, 2011. For the reasons

stated in the Court’s corresponding Opinion,

IT IS, on this ‘ day of March, 2013

ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized from a rental vehicle

on April 27, 2011 is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to suppress statements made during a telephone

conversation on April 27, 2011 is DENIED.

,0/ •,,

ose L. Linares

United States District Judge

1
Exhibit
32.01
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Kinder Travel Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dirk
Holzhauer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/
      Dirk HolzhauerBy:
      Dirk HolzhauerChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDated:
      November 14, 2008
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
   1
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1418 HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. IMMUNEX CORPORATION and AMGEN INC.,

Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States Court District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 07-CV-780, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

ON MOTION Before MOORE, Circuit Judge. ORDER Human Genome Sciences, Inc. moves for a 14-day extension of time, until April 6, 2009, to file a reply brief. Immunex Corporation and Amgen Inc. oppose. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion for an extension of time is granted. FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Date
cc: Richard L. DeLucia, Esq. Robert M. Galvin, Esq. Jan Horbaly Clerk 

### FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT APR 0 2 2009 s20 JAW HORSALY CLERK 

# APR 2 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

Dated: Friday, July 10, 2009.

Vicky D'Onofrio,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-16864 Filed 7-13-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-P