alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
20. Persons at work 1 to 34 hours in all and in nonagricultural industries by reason for working less than 35 hours

and usual full- or part-time status

(Numbers in thousands)

Reason for working less than 35 hours

2009

All industries Nonagricultural industries

Total

Usually

 work

full time

Usually

 work

part time

Total

Usually

 work

full time

Usually

 work

part time

 Total, 16 years and over ................................................................... 37,614 12,853 24,761 37,041 12,679 24,362

Economic reasons ................................................................................ 8,913 2,861 6,051 8,791 2,801 5,990

 Slack work or business conditions ...................................................... 6,648 2,632 4,015 6,556 2,586 3,970

 Could only find part-time work ............................................................ 1,966  ̆ 1,966 1,955  ̆ 1,955

 Seasonal work .................................................................................... 192 122 70 174 109 65

 Job started or ended during week ...................................................... 108 108  ̆ 107 107  ̆

Noneconomic reasons .......................................................................... 28,701 9,991 18,710 28,250 9,878 18,372

 Child-care problems ........................................................................... 713 57 656 709 57 652

 Other family or personal obligations ................................................... 4,916 644 4,272 4,844 636 4,208

 Health or medical limitations ............................................................... 793  ̆ 793 773  ̆ 773

 In school or training ............................................................................ 5,714 81 5,634 5,654 79 5,575

 Retired or Social Security limit on earnings ........................................ 2,200  ̆ 2,200 2,098  ̆ 2,098

 Vacation or personal day .................................................................... 3,626 3,626  ̆ 3,592 3,592  ̆

 Holiday, legal or religious ................................................................... 2,834 2,834  ̆ 2,822 2,822  ̆

 Weather-related curtailment ............................................................... 420 420  ̆ 393 393  ̆

 All other reasons ................................................................................. 7,485 2,329 5,156 7,364 2,299 5,065

Average hours:

Economic reasons .............................................................................. 22.7 23.6 22.2 22.7 23.7 22.2

 Other reasons ..................................................................................... 21.9 26.1 19.6 21.9 26.1 19.7

 NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data. Dash indicates no data or data that do not meet publication

criteria.

227
ME1 13072836v.1

John E. Flaherty

Partner 

T. 973.639.7903 

F. 973.297.3971 

jflaherty@mccarter.com

McCarter & English, LLP 

Four Gateway Center 

100 Mulberry Street 

Newark, NJ 07102-4056 

T. 973.622.4444 

F. 973.624.7070 

www.mccarter.com 

BOSTON

HARTFORD 

NEW YORK 

NEWARK 

PHILADELPHIA 

STAMFORD 

WILMINGTON 

March 1, 2012 

VIA ECF AND FEDERAL EXPRESS 

Honorable Lois H. Goodman, U.S.M.J. 

U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey 

Clarkson S. Fisher Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse 

402 East State Street 

Trenton, New Jersey 08608 

Re: Orexo AB v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. 

Civil Action No. 11-3788 (FLW) (LHG) 

Dear Judge Goodman: 

Our firm, along with our co-counsel Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, represents 

Plaintiff Orexo AB in the above-referenced matter. We write on behalf of both 

Parties to request a one-week extension of the deadline to submit a consent 

discovery confidentiality order, which, under this Court’s February 7, 2012 Pretrial 

Scheduling Order, is due to be filed today. 

The Parties have exchanged a draft of the order and have conferred on the 

unresolved issues. The Parties are working to finalize the consent order, which they 

expect to be prepared to submit on or before March 8, 2012. 

Accordingly, the Parties respectfully request that the Court stay the Parties’ 

obligations under the Pretrial Scheduling Order and the Local Rules to submit a 

consent discovery confidentiality order or alternative application for a discovery 

confidentiality order, until March 8, 2012. 

Respectfully, 

s/John E. Flaherty 

John E. Flaherty 

cc: All Counsel (via email) 

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW -LHG Document 38 Filed 03/01/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 139
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5018

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain capers preserved by vinegar 

or acetic acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2004

Mr. PASCRELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain capers preserved 

by vinegar or acetic acid.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CAPERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.20.03 Capers, prepared or preserved by vinegar or acetic 

acid, in containers holding 

more than 3.4 kg (provided 

for in subheading 

2001.90.10) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2007 ’’. 
2

•HR 5018 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 132 (Monday, July 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16411]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLNVC0200.L58740000.EU0000; N-82710, N-82711; 9-08807; TAS:14X5260]


Notice of Realty Action; Extension of Segregation of Public Lands 
for Proposed Sale in Lyon County, NV

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of realty action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice extends the segregation on 998.2 acres of public 
lands in Lyon County, Nevada for up to 2 additional years.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Slagle, (775) 885-6115.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following described public lands are 
located southwest (sec. 22) and south (sec. 36) of Fernley, Nevada:

Mount Diablo Meridian

T. 20 N., R. 24 E.,
    Sec. 22, 1ots 1 to 6, inclusive, NE\1/4\, E\1/2\NW\1/4\, E\1/
2\SW\1/4\, and W\1/2\SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 36, E\1/2\NE\1/4\NE\1/4\, NW\1/4\NE\1/4\NE\1/4\, N\1/
2\NW\1/4\NE\1/4\, and W\1/2\.

    The areas described aggregate 998.2 acres, more or less, in Lyon 
County.

    Notification of a 2-year segregation of the described lands from 
appropriation under the public land laws, including the mining laws, 
except the sale provisions of the Federal Land Policy Management Act, 
appeared in the Federal Register on August 20, 2007 (72 FR 46509). The 
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has completed an environmental analysis 
and by decision dated August 11, 2008, found the lands suitable for 
sale. The BLM has encountered unanticipated processing delays, 
including a pending action to clear an encumbrance on portions of the 
sale area. In accordance with 43 CFR 2711.1-2(d), the BLM Nevada State 
Director has determined that extension of this segregation is necessary 
to provide sufficient time to complete final processing steps required 
to offer these lands for sale. The segregative effect will terminate on 
issuance of a patent, publication in the Federal Register of a 
termination of the segregation, or on August 20, 2011, whichever occurs 
first.

(Authority: 43 CFR 2711.1-2(d))

Bryant Smith,
Associate District Manager, Carson City District.
[FR Doc. E9-16411 Filed 7-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 By:
    /s/  Michael NoleName:
    Michael NoleTitle:
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    August 14, 2008
Order entered February 1 4 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 01485 - CV DANIEL K. HAGOOD, P. C. AND FITZPATRICK H AGOOD SMITH AND UHL, LLP, Appellant s V. KUNAL KAPAI, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 18 - 04027 - D



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee’s February 13, 2019 first unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than March 4, 2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Skagit State Bancorp, Inc.  on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), we, Cheryl Bishop, President and Chief Executive Officer, andCarla F. Tucker, Executive Vice-President/Chief Financial Officer, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
| /s/  Cheryl R. Bishop                  |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Cheryl  R. Bishop                      |   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                   |   |
|                                   |   |
| /s/  Carla F. Tucker                   |   |
| Carla  F. Tucker                       |   |
| Executive  Vice-President              |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer               |   |
|                                   |   |
|                                   |   |
| November 9,  2010                 |   |
| Date                                   |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 23.1




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
                         ------------------------------


     We  consent  to the  reference  of our firm  under  the  section  "Selected
Financial  Data"  and to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statements  on Form S-8 (Nos.  333-45422,  333-53814,  333-55130,  333-66250 and
333-82488  of our report dated  February 3, 2004,  except for note 7e, for which
the date is  February  12,  2004,  with  respect to the  consolidated  financial
statements  and schedule of Radvision Ltd. for the years ended December 31, 2002
and 2003 included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended  December
31, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                            /s/ Kost, Forer, Gabbay & Kasierer
                                            Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
                                            A Member of Ernst & Young Global



Tel-Aviv, Israel
March 11, 2004
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 08, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 08, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20A1803. JOHN RAYMOND ETIENNE v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion the hereby GRANTED, and 

jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
RCM 4.8

RCM 4.8 REconciliation of Names Revised Feb 19, 2014 Page 1 of 3

4.8.1 Reconciliation of Names Without Affidavits

A. General - If the name claimed or established on Board records for a person 

varies materially from the name as it appears on the application or evidence in 

file, reconcile the discrepancy.

B. Methods of Reconciling Names - Discrepant names may be reconciled when:

1. Sufficient information is on record.

2. The employer states affirmatively that the service verified under a different 

name is the service of the claimant.

3. The maiden name of a married woman is shown on the document or other 

evidence, and that name is also shown on an application for benefits.

4. The variation in names is caused by one of the following:

• Anglicization or simplification of spelling;

• Use of standard nicknames and diminutive forms of names;

• Literal translation of names from one language to another;

• Transposition, addition, or dropping of names in accordance with 

established popular or religious customs.

NOTE: When doubt exists after referring to the list of Reconciliation of 

Given Names, Webster's New International Dictionary, or any other 

standard dictionary as to whether or not a reconciliation can be made, 

refer to the case to your supervisor, who has a copy of CFO Informational 

Memorandum No. 25-74, Reconciliation of Given Names.

4.8.2 Types Of Evidence

If reconciliation cannot be accomplished under the preceding section, obtain:

• A personally executed affidavit from the person involved stating that the names 

involved refer to one and the same person; and

• A corroborating affidavit executed by a responsible person which substantiates the 

applicant's statement and reflects the basis of the affiant's knowledge.

In cases in which the change of name was effected through legal proceedings, obtain 

the original or a certified copy of the legal authorization.
RCM 4.8

RCM 4.8 REconciliation of Names Revised Feb 19, 2014 Page 2 of 3

4.8.3 Discrepant Name Reported By Employer

If a difference exists between the name of the employee as reported on the employer's 

service report and the name under which the employee claimed the service, compare 

the other identifying data (i.e., DOB, place of residence, and similar information) to 

determine whether or not the forms relate to the same person. When the employer is 

unable to affirm that the discrepant names refer to the same person, obtain affidavits.
Case 3:11-cr-00325-PGS Document 5 Filed 05/16/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 21
Case 3:11-cr-00325-PGS Document 5 Filed 05/16/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 22
Case 3:11-cr-00325-PGS Document 5 Filed 05/16/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 23
**Exhibit 32**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Skagit State Bancorp, Inc.  on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), we, Cheryl Bishop, Chief Executive Officer, and Carla F.Tucker, Senior Vice-President/Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
| /s/Cheryl  R. Bishop    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Cheryl R. Bishop        |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

 
| /s/Carla  F. Tucker      |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Carla F. Tucker          |   |
| Senior  Vice-President   |   |
| Chief Financial  Officer |   |

 

 
| May 14, 2008 |   |
|-------------------|--------|
| Date              |   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 134 (Wednesday, July 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16789]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

July 9, 2009
    The Department of Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the date of publication of this notice. Copies of the 
submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance 
Officer listed. Comments regarding this information collection should 
be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department 
Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, and 1750 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before August 14, 2009 
to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1510-0073.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Form: 111.
    Title: ETA Financial Agency Agreement.
    Description: This application will collect a financial 
institution's identifying information, confirm a financial 
institution's commitment to offering the ETA, identify a point of 
contact for the ETA Program and determine date when institutions will 
offer ETAs.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 10 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Wesley Powe (202) 874-7662, Financial Management 
Service, Room 135, 3700 East West Highway, Hyattsville, MD 20782.
    OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed (202) 395-7873, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.

Celina Elphage,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
 [FR Doc. E9-16789 Filed 7-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBITS

A, 1-5, 10-16, 27-29 

TO THE PEPPAS DECLARATION

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW-LHG Document 97 Filed 10/05/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1534
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Abdon Ricardo HERNANDEZ-MATEOS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-40351

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 2012.

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Sarah Beth Landau, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*343Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Abdon Ricardo Hernandez-Mateos raises an argument that is foreclosed by *United States v. Betancourt,*586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir.2009), which reaffirmed the holding in *United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez,*319 F.3d 695, 700 (5th Cir.2003), that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of the offense under 21 U.S.C. § 841. The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
ME1 13998061v.1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

OREXO AB,

Plaintiff,

v.

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

and MYLAN INC.,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 11-3788 (MAS)(LHG)

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL

TO: THE CLERK OF COURT AND ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that William J. McNamara withdraws as attorney of record

for Plaintiff Orexo AB ("Plaintiff"). Attorneys from Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP

and McCarter & English, LLP will continue to represent Plaintiff in this case.

Dated: August 20, 2012 s/ John E. Flaherty

 John E. Flaherty

McCarter & English, LLP

Four Gateway Center

100 Mulberry Street

Newark, New Jersey 07102

T (973) 622-4444

F (973) 624-7070

Click to buy NOW!

PDF-XChange

www.docu-track.com

Click to buy NOW!

PDF-XChange

www.docu-track.com

Case 3:11-cv-03788-MAS-LHG Document 86 Filed 08/20/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 808
2

ME1 13998061v.1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 20, 2012, I caused a copy of the foregoing NOTICE OF

WITHDRAWAL to be served upon all counsel of record by operation of the Court’s electronic

filing system.

 s/ John E. Flaherty

 John E. Flaherty

Click to buy NOW!

PDF-XChange

www.docu-track.com

Click to buy NOW!

PDF-XChange

www.docu-track.com

Case 3:11-cv-03788-MAS-LHG Document 86 Filed 08/20/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 809
Case 2:11-cr-00454-JLL Document 10 Filed 09/07/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 19
Case 2:11-cr-00454-JLL Document 10 Filed 09/07/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 20
Case 2:11-cr-00454-JLL Document 10 Filed 09/07/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 21
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

JEAN EDDIS, on behalf of

herself and all those

similarly situated,

 Plaintiff,

v.

MIDLAND FUNDING, L.L.C. and

PRESSLER & PRESSLER, L.L.P.,

 Defendants. 

HON. JEROME B. SIMANDLE

Civil No. 11-3923 (JBS/AMD)

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on Defendant’s

motion to dismiss [Docket Item 14]; the Court having considered

the submissions of the parties in support thereof and opposition

thereto; for the reasons explained in the Opinion of today’s

date; and for good cause shown;

IT IS this 22nd day of February, 2012 hereby

ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss shall be and

hereby is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall close this docket.

 s/ Jerome B. Simandle 

JEROME B. SIMANDLE

Chief United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-03923-JBS-AMD Document 22 Filed 02/22/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 162