alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.19

 

Amendment #1 to the

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation 401(k)

Savings and Investment Plan

(Effective January 1, 2010)

 

The Edwards Lifesciences Corporation 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan (“Plan”) is amended as of January 1, 2011, unless specified otherwise:

 

1.               Section 2.16 is amended by the addition of subsection (e) which reads as follows:

 

“(e)  any employee who is classified as a “proctor” who is hired in conjunction with the launch of the THV product.”

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, a duly authorized officer of the Company has caused this Plan to be executed on the 1st day of April, 2011.

 

 

	
 
    	
EDWARDS   LIFESCIENCES
    
	
 
    	
CORPORATION
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Robert C. Reindl
**Exhibit31.1**

**Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification**

I, Colin Campbell,certify that:

1.                                       Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hostopia.com Inc.;

2.                                       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have:

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)             any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|  Date: February 13, 2007 | /s/ COLIN CAMPBELL       |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                          | Colin Campbell           |
|                          | Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
907 A.2d 426

#### IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY W. LUTZ, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 002571975).

October 3, 2006.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-164, concluding on the record certified to the *337Board pursuant to *Rule*1:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that JEFFREY W. LUTZ of BRICK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, should be reprimanded for violating *RPC*1.1(a) (gross neglect), *RPC*1.3 (lack of diligence), *RPC*1.4(b) (failure to communicate with client), and *RPC*8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having concluded that the Office of Attorney Ethics should conduct an audit of respondent’s attorney books and records;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JEFFREY W. LUTZ is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics conduct an audit of the books and records maintained by JEFFREY W. LUTZ pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6, the scope of audit to be determined by the Director of the Office of Attorney Ethics; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
2012 EX 10.18






Exhibit 10.18


SCHEDULE OF AMENDMENTS TO CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS


The following have executed Amendments to Change of Control Severance Agreements substantially in the form of the amendment attached as Exhibit 10.XX to Valero’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (SEC File No. 1-13175).




Kimberly S. Bowers
Michael S. Ciskowski
S. Eugene Edwards
Joseph W. Gorder
William R. Klesse
**Exhibit 32****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), DougSabella, Chief Executive Officer of Veraz Networks, Inc. (the “Company”), and Al Wood, the ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge:**1.**The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, and towhich this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “***Periodic Report***”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and**2.**The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.**INWITNESS WHEREOF,**the undersigned have set their hands hereto asof the 14th day of November,2007.           /s/ Doug Sabella   Doug Sabella    **CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**         /s/ Al Wood   Al Wood    **CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00784-CV

Alyssa Lee Brewer, Appellant

v.

James Patrick Esquenazi, Appellee

FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

NO. 292,406-E, STEVEN J. DUSKIE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Alyssa Lee Brewer has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this 

appeal. We grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Justices Baker, Kelly, and Smith

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: January 17, 2023
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 135 (Thursday, July 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16921]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Impact of Tic Disorders, Including Tourette 
Syndrome, in Youth, on Individuals, Families, and Communities, Funding 
Opportunity Announcement (FOA) DD09-004, Initial Review

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 10:30 a.m.-12:30 p.m., July 31, 2009 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of ``Impact of Tic Disorders, 
Including Tourette Syndrome, in Youth, on Individuals, Families, and 
Communities, FOA DD09-004.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Michael Dalmat, Scientific 
Review Administrator, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop K92, 
Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone (770) 488-6423.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: July 9, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-16921 Filed 7-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                                   CONSENT OF
                     GILBERT LAUSTSEN JUNG ASSOCIATES LTD.

As independent petroleum consultants, Gilbert Laustsen Jung Associates Ltd.
hereby consents to the use of our Reserve Appraisal and Economic Analysis Report
dated January 1, 2001, and all references to our firm included in or made a part
of the Ivanhoe Energy Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about March 30, 2001.

                                          Yours truly,

                                          GILBERT LAUSTSEN JUNG ASSOCIATES LTD.

                                          /s/ WAYNE W. CHOW
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Wayne W. Chow, P. Eng.
                                          Vice-President

                                          March 15, 2001

                                       E-64
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 7 Filed 05/18/11 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 77
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 7 Filed 05/18/11 Page 2 of 14 PageID: 78
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 7 Filed 05/18/11 Page 3 of 14 PageID: 79
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 7 Filed 05/18/11 Page 4 of 14 PageID: 80
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 7 Filed 05/18/11 Page 5 of 14 PageID: 81
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 7 Filed 05/18/11 Page 6 of 14 PageID: 82
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 7 Filed 05/18/11 Page 7 of 14 PageID: 83
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 7 Filed 05/18/11 Page 8 of 14 PageID: 84
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 7 Filed 05/18/11 Page 9 of 14 PageID: 85
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 7 Filed 05/18/11 Page 10 of 14 PageID: 86
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 7 Filed 05/18/11 Page 11 of 14 PageID: 87
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 7 Filed 05/18/11 Page 12 of 14 PageID: 88
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 7 Filed 05/18/11 Page 13 of 14 PageID: 89
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 7 Filed 05/18/11 Page 14 of 14 PageID: 90
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Annual Report of RADVision Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tsipi
Kagan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Tsipi Kagan*
---------------
Tsipi Kagan
Chief Financial Officer
March 15, 2004



* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hostopia.com Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Mugan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (1350, as adopted pursuant to (906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 14, 2007 | /s/ MICHAEL J. MUGAN   |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------|

|   | Michael J. Mugan |
|--------|------------------|

|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

 

 

 

34

----
Exhibit 10.41

 

BUNGE LIMITED BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

DESCRIPTION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION

 

(Effective as of January 1, 2013)

 

Annual Retainer

 

·                                          $100,000 per year.

 

Lead Independent Director Fees

 

·                                          $20,000 per year.

 

Committee Chairman Fees

 

·                                          $20,000 per year for Audit Committee chair.

·                                          $15,000 per year for each other committee chair.

 

Committee Member Fees

 

·                                          $10,000 per year for Audit Committee membership.

·                                          $0 per year for each other committee membership.

 

Meeting Fees

 

·                                          If the Board of Directors meets more than 10 times per year, each non-employee director will receive a fee of $1,000 for each additional meeting attended.

·                                          If a committee meets more than 10 times per year, each committee member will receive a fee of $1,000 for each additional meeting attended.

 

Equity Awards

 

·                                          Pursuant to the 2007 Non-Employee Directors Equity Incentive Plan, an annual equity award will be granted to each continuing non-employee director as of the date of Bunge’s annual general meeting of the shareholders.  The value and form of award are recommended by the Compensation Committee.

 

·                                          Pursuant to the 2007 Non-Employee Directors Equity Incentive Plan, an equity award will be granted upon a new non-employee director’s initial election or appointment to the Board of Directors.  The award will include a pro rata portion of the awards made to the non-employee directors generally on the immediately preceding date of grant based on the number of days from the date of the director’s initial appointment or election to the next annual general meeting.
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 10 , 2019.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 18

- 00444

- CR

JUAN L. MORENO , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 337th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1514867

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Juan L. Moreno appeals his conviction for aggravated assault

. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without me rit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 , 811

– 13 (Tex. Cr im. App. 1978).2

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford
v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more t han 60 days have passed and no pro se response has been filed. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in
the record. We are not to address t he merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for
review. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is af firmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Hassan. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2( b).
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7272
DEVON SAMPLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SERGEANT TART; R. ADCOCK, Lieutenant; HATTIE PIMPONG, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-95-541-5-BO) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 6, 1997 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Devon Sample, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sample v. Tart , No. CA-95-541-5-BO (E.D.N.C. June 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: May 15, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Edward J. GildeaEdward J. GildeaCEO, President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-8012

JUAN RAMON AYALA, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GEORGE HINKLE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00319) Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 20, 2007 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Juan Ramon Ayala, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Beatty Martin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Juan Ramon Ayala seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ayala has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Ayala’s motion for a certificate of appealability, deny his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny his motion for judicial notice, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Case 2:11-cr-00294-GEB Document 25 Filed 04/27/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 56
Case 2:11-cr-00294-GEB Document 25 Filed 04/27/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 57