alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 1 of 27 PageID: 387
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 2 of 27 PageID: 388
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 3 of 27 PageID: 389
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 4 of 27 PageID: 390
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 5 of 27 PageID: 391
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 6 of 27 PageID: 392
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 7 of 27 PageID: 393
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 8 of 27 PageID: 394
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 9 of 27 PageID: 395
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 10 of 27 PageID: 396
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 11 of 27 PageID: 397
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 12 of 27 PageID: 398
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 13 of 27 PageID: 399
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 14 of 27 PageID: 400
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 15 of 27 PageID: 401
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 16 of 27 PageID: 402
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 17 of 27 PageID: 403
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 18 of 27 PageID: 404
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 19 of 27 PageID: 405
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 20 of 27 PageID: 406
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 21 of 27 PageID: 407
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 22 of 27 PageID: 408
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 23 of 27 PageID: 409
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 24 of 27 PageID: 410
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 25 of 27 PageID: 411
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 26 of 27 PageID: 412
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC -JAD Document 43 Filed 09/16/11 Page 27 of 27 PageID: 413
29637924.1 

ORDER RE SPRINT’S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF 

CASE NO. C10-05621-SBA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ARLENE BAISA LOCKHART and GENE 

LOCKHART, on behalf of themselves and all 

others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

SPRINT SOLUTIONS INC., SPRINT 

SPECTRUM LP, 

Defendants. 

 CASE NO. C10-05621-SBA 

 ORDER RE DEFENDANTS SPRINT 

SPECTRUM, L.P.’S AND SPRINT 

SOLUTIONS, INC.’S 

MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE 

RELIEF TO VACATE DEADLINES FOR 

RULE 26 CONFERENCE AND RULE 26 

EXCHANGE IN LIGHT OF PENDING 

MDL PROCEEDINGS 

Case 2:11-cv-02308-SDW-MCA Document 50 Filed 03/01/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 518
29637924 2

ORDER RE SPRINT’S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF 

CASE NO. C10-05621-SBA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Having considered Defendants Sprint Spectrum, L.P.’s and Sprint Solutions, Inc.’s Motion 

For Administrative Relief to Vacate Deadlines for Rule 26 Conference and Rule 26 Exchange in 

Light Of Pending MDL Proceedings, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

Sprint Spectrum, L.P.’s and Sprint Solutions, Inc.’s Motion for Administrative Relief is 

GRANTED in light of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation proceedings currently pending 

and scheduled for hearing on March 30, 2011 in San Diego, California. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT: 

(1) the March 1, 2011 deadline to file ADR Certification is vacated; 

(2) the March 1, 2011 deadline to file either stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need 

for ADR Phone Conference is vacated; 

(3) the March 1, 2011 deadline to meet and confer re: Initial Disclosures, Early Settlement, 

ADR Process Selection and Discovery Plan is vacated; 

(4) the March 15, 2011 deadline to submit Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures 

or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report and file Case Management Statement is vacated. 

DATED: 3/1/11 By: 

 Saundra Brown Armstrong 

 United States District Court Judge 

Respectfully submitted, 

DATED: February 24, 2011 

MCGUIREWOODS LLP 

By /s/ Erika L. Pennington.

Erika L. Pennington 

Attorneys for Defendants Sprint Solutions, Inc. 

and Sprint Spectrum LP 

Case 2:11-cv-02308-SDW-MCA Document 50 Filed 03/01/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 519
29637924 3

ORDER RE SPRINT’S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF 

CASE NO. C10-05621-SBA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

Case 2:11-cv-02308-SDW-MCA Document 50 Filed 03/01/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 520
Opinion issued October 15, 2013

 

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-13-00225-CV

IN RE TRAVELERS LLOYDS OF TEXAS INSURANCE COMPANY, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

By petition for writ of mandamus, relator, Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance 

Company, seeks mandamus relief from the trial court’s February 22, 2013 order denying 

summary judgment.

We lift the stay previously ordered by this Court and DENY the petition for writ of 

mandamus. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle. 

 

1

The underlying case is Samuel Guerra, et al v. Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company, 

No. 2009-33090 in the 11th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Hon. Mike Miller

presiding.
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Shaw Hong, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of OmniVision Technologies, Inc. on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of OmniVision Technologies, Inc. A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to OmniVision Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by OmniVision
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. Dated: July 14, 2005 By:
    /s/Shaw HongShaw HongChief Executive Officer, President and Director (Principal Executive Officer) I, Peter V. Leigh, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of OmniVision Technologies, Inc. on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of OmniVision Technologies, Inc. A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to OmniVision Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by OmniVision
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. Dated: July 14, 2005 By:
    /s/Peter V. LeighPeter V. LeighVice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

____________________________________

:

DAVID L. STREETER, :

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICE, :

:

Defendant. :

____________________________________:

Civil Action No. 11-3419 (SRC)

ORDER

CLOSED

CHESLER, U.S.D.J.

This matter comes before this Court following the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”)

filed on May 7, 2012 by Magistrate Judge Shipp, pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) and L. CIV.

R. 72.1(a)(2). The R&R recommended that Plaintiff’s Complaint be dismissed following, inter

alia, Plaintiff’s failure to comply with Court orders and to prosecute his case. The time for filing

objections to the R&R has expired, and no objections were submitted. 

A magistrate judge’s recommended disposition of a dispositive matter is subject to de

novo review. In re U.S. Healthcare, 159 F.3d 142, 145-46 (3d Cir. 1998); see also FED. R.

CIV. P. 72(b). This Court has reviewed the R&R under the appropriate de novo standard, and

agrees with Magistrate Judge Shipp’s analysis and conclusion. Therefore,

IT IS on this 11th day of June, 2012,

ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Shipp’s R&R (Docket Entry No. 14) is adopted as

the Opinion of the Court; and it is

1

Case 2:11-cv-03419-SRC Document 15 Filed 06/13/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 71
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice, and

this case shall be marked CLOSED. 

 s/ Stanley R. Chesler 

STANLEY R. CHESLER, U.S.D.J. 

2

Case 2:11-cv-03419-SRC Document 15 Filed 06/13/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 72
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CYBRA
      CORPORATION**





**SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION**





In
      connection with the periodic report of Harold Brand (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Harold Brand, Interim Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
      purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
      States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.




Date:
                November 13, 2007By:
            /s/
                Harold BrandHarold
                  Brand
              Interim
                Chief Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-2013

LT Case No. 2022-DP-024

_____________________________

R.F., Father of G.F., a Child,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND 

FAMILIES,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County. 

Stephen E. Toner, Jr., Judge. 

Ana Gomez-Mallada, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant. 

Rachel Batten, of Children’s Legal Services, Brooksville, for

Appellee. 

Blake Lynne Bruce, of Defending Best Interests Project, 

Alexandria, Virginia, and Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide 

Director of Appeals, and Amanda Victoria Glass, Senior 

Attorney, of Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, 

for Guardian ad Litem o/b/o G.F. 

November 14, 2023 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
2

HARRIS, SOUD, and PRATT, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer of Tidelands Oil & Gas
Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ James B.
Smith


James B.
Smith, President & Chief Financial Officer


Date:
April 15, 2008
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Shaw Hong, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of OmniVision Technologies, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
June 30, 2010

By:

/s/ SHAW HONGShaw HongChief Executive Officer and President


---



QuickLinks
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU NE 2 3 , 2015

NO. 03

- 13

- 00371

- CR

Douglas Farirayi, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 427TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO OD WIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudica tion of costs

is made

.
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

27. Unemployed persons by reason for unemployment, sex, and age

(Numbers in thousands)

Reason

Total,

16 years

and over

Men,

20 years

and over

Women,

20 years

and over

Both sexes,

16 to 19

years

2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005

NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYED

 Total unemployed .................................................................. 8,149 7,591 3,791 3,392 3,150 3,013 1,208 1,186

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs .......... 4,197 3,667 2,503 2,095 1,529 1,417 165 155

 On temporary layoff ................................................................ 998 933 613 557 326 317 59 59

 Not on temporary layoff .......................................................... 3,199 2,734 1,890 1,538 1,202 1,100 107 96

 Permanent job losers ............................................................ 2,386 1,955 1,366 1,068 949 831 71 56

 Persons who completed temporary jobs .............................. 813 779 524 470 253 269 36 40

Job leavers ............................................................................... 858 872 398 405 384 391 76 76

Reentrants ................................................................................ 2,408 2,386 791 793 1,107 1,103 510 489

New entrants ............................................................................ 686 666 99 99 131 101 456 466

PERCENT DISTRIBUTION

 Total unemployed .................................................................. 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs .......... 51.5 48.3 66.0 61.8 48.5 47.0 13.7 13.1

 On temporary layoff ............................................................... 12.2 12.3 16.2 16.4 10.4 10.5 4.9 5.0

 Not on temporary layoff ......................................................... 39.3 36.0 49.8 45.3 38.2 36.5 8.8 8.1

Job leavers ............................................................................... 10.5 11.5 10.5 11.9 12.2 13.0 6.3 6.4

Reentrants ................................................................................ 29.5 31.4 20.9 23.4 35.1 36.6 42.2 41.3

New entrants ............................................................................ 8.4 8.8 2.6 2.9 4.1 3.3 37.8 39.3

UNEMPLOYED AS A PERCENT OF THE

 CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs .......... 2.8 2.5 3.3 2.7 2.4 2.2 2.3 2.2

Job leavers ............................................................................... .6 .6 .5 .5 .6 .6 1.1 1.1

Reentrants ................................................................................ 1.6 1.6 1.0 1.0 1.7 1.7 7.2 6.8

New entrants ............................................................................ .5 .4 .1 .1 .2 .2 6.4 6.5

 NOTE: Beginning in January 2005, data reflect revised population controls used in the household survey.

247
Consumer Price Index, Bureau of Labor Statistics, February 2018 

Consumer Price Index: Changes in Seasonal Adjustment Status for 2018

These items are changing to Seasonally Adjusted:

Item code Title 

CUUR0000SEHE01 

CWUR0000SEHE01 

CUUR0000SEGD 

CWUR0000SEGD 

CUUR0000SEHK02 

CWUR0000SEHK02 

CUUR0000SS52051 

Fuel oil 

Miscellaneous personal services 

Other appliances 

Parking fees and tolls 

 

 

 

 

 
Consumer Price Index, Bureau of Labor Statistics, February 2018 

These items are changing to Not Seasonally Adjusted: 

Item code Title 

CUUR0000SS20022 

CUUR0000SETA03 

CWUR0000SETA03 

Distilled spirits, excluding whiskey, at 

home 

Leased cars and trucks 

CUUR0000SAG1 

CWUR0000SAG1 

Personal care
Case 3:11-cv-02506-JAP-TJB Document 95 Filed 09/27/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1916
Case 2:10-cv-03400-DMC-JAD Document 8 Filed 02/03/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 32
Case 2:10-cv-03400-DMC-JAD Document 8 Filed 02/03/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 33
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 132 (Monday, July 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16440]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13451-000]


McGinnis, Inc.; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application Accepted 
for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Competing 
Applications

July 2, 2009.
    On April 29, 2009, McGinnis, Inc. filed an application for a 
preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, 
proposing to study the feasibility of the Greenup Hydrokinetic Project, 
located on the Ohio River, in Greenup County, Kentucky, and Scioto 
County, Ohio. The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is 
to grant the permit holder priority to file a license application 
during the permit term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the 
permit holder to perform any land disturbing activities or otherwise 
enter upon lands or waters owned by others without the owners' express 
permission.
    The proposed project would consist of: (1) A 100 to 300-foot-long 
by 20 to 52-foot-wide barge spudded down to the riverbed; (2) 10 6-8-
foot-long by 6-8-foot-diameter turbine-generators mounted in line along 
the side of the barge; (3) one armored, high-voltage cable transmitting 
the generated power to the existing transmission line located adjacent 
to the proposed project area; and (4) appurtenant facilities. The 
proposed project would generate about 1,533 megawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Bruce D. McGinnis, Sr., McGinnis, Inc., P.O. Box 
534, 502 Second St. Ext., South Point, OH 45680, phone: (740) 377-4391.
    FERC Contact: Sergiu Serban, 202-502-6211.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the 
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of 
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. 
Enter the docket number (P-13451) in the docket number field to access 
the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-16440 Filed 7-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P