alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

34. Unemployed jobseekers by sex, reason for unemployment, and active jobsearch methods used

Sex and reason

1998

Thousands of

persons Methods used as a percent of total jobseekers

Average

number

of

methods

used

Total

unemployed

Total

jobseekers

Employer

directly

Sent out

resumes

or filled

out

applications

Placed

or

answered

ads

Friends

or

relatives

Public

employment

agency

Private

employment

agency

Other

 Total, 16 years and over ......................................................... 6,210 5,344 64.6 48.6 15.9 14.8 19.2 6.9 8.8 1.79

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs1 ......... 2,822 1,957 68.0 47.1 19.7 17.5 25.2 9.5 10.0 1.98

Job leavers ............................................................................... 734 734 67.9 51.2 18.8 13.4 20.2 7.7 7.8 1.87

Reentrants ................................................................................ 2,132 2,132 61.1 48.2 13.1 13.0 15.6 5.4 8.8 1.65

New entrants ............................................................................ 520 520 61.7 51.8 9.4 14.0 9.8 2.4 6.2 1.56

 Men, 16 years and over .......................................................... 3,266 2,748 65.6 46.7 15.8 16.3 19.2 6.9 9.4 1.80

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs1 ......... 1,703 1,185 69.4 44.9 19.1 18.7 24.6 9.4 10.6 1.97

Job leavers ............................................................................... 368 368 68.6 49.7 18.4 15.0 19.7 7.1 7.9 1.87

Reentrants ................................................................................ 931 931 60.7 46.0 12.4 14.3 15.1 4.9 9.7 1.64

New entrants ............................................................................ 264 264 61.6 53.0 8.9 14.2 8.7 2.7 5.7 1.55

 Women, 16 years and over .................................................... 2,944 2,596 63.6 50.6 16.1 13.2 19.1 6.9 8.2 1.78

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs1 ......... 1,119 772 65.9 50.6 20.6 15.7 26.0 9.7 9.1 1.98

Job leavers ............................................................................... 366 366 67.2 52.7 19.1 11.8 20.7 8.4 7.6 1.88

Reentrants ................................................................................ 1,201 1,201 61.4 49.9 13.6 11.9 15.9 5.8 8.1 1.67

New entrants ............................................................................ 257 257 61.9 50.6 10.0 13.7 10.9 2.1 6.7 1.56

1 Data on the number of jobseekers and the jobsearch methods used exclude

persons on temporary layoff.

 NOTE: The jobseeker total is less than the total unemployed because it does

not include persons on temporary layoff. The percent using each method will

always total more than 100 because many jobseekers use more than one method.

Beginning in January 1998, data reflect new composite estimation procedures and

revised population controls used in the household survey.

209
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rafael A. Solano, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 782]

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed, a determinate term of imprisonment of eight years, was within the range authorized by the applicable statute *(see*Penal Law § 70.71 [3] [b] [ii]), and therefore was not illegal.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Fisher, J.P., Miller, McCarthy and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 By:
    
    /s/ Bryan McGuireName:
    
    Bryan McGuireTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    November 14, 2008
EX-10.15


 Exhibit 10.15 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 HANCOCK HOLDING COMPANY 

2010 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 
 HANCOCK HOLDING COMPANY (the “Company”) hereby amends the HANCOCK HOLDING COMPANY 2010 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (the “Plan”) this the 15th day of December, 2011.

 W I T N E S S E T H: 

WHEREAS, effective the 1st day of January, 2011, the Company established the Plan to provide for ownership of stock in the Company by Associates
of the Company and/or of its Affiliates; and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 18.1 of the Plan, the Company reserved
the right to amend the Plan at any time provided no such amendment affects any Participant’s rights to the benefits of contributions made prior to the date of such amendment; and 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the eligibility provisions of the Plan. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Hancock Holding Company 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

ARTICLE XVI 

Section 4.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by the deletion of the Section in its entirety and the substitution of the following:

 4.1 Eligibility Requirements. Each Eligible Associate shall be eligible for participation in this Plan after
attaining age eighteen (18) and completing sixty (60) days of consecutive employment as an Eligible Associate with the Company or one of its Affiliates. 
 ARTICLE XVII 
 This Amendment shall supersede the provisions of the Plan to the
extend those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions of this Amendment. 
 ARTICLE XVIII 

Capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the same meaning as when used in the Plan unless otherwise specifically provided
herein. 






 ARTICLE XIX 

This Amendment shall be effective as of the 1st day of January, 2012. 
 ARTICLE XX 
 Except as amended here, the Hancock Holding Company 2010 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan shall remain unchanged. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed
by its officers thereunto duly authorized and attested as of the date first-noted above. 
  

											
	ATTEST:	 		 	HANCOCK HOLDING COMPANY
					
	By:	 	 	 		 	By:	 	 
		 		 		 		 		 	
		 		 		 		 	Title:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5224 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5224

                 For the relief of Dylan Brian Benwell.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 5, 2004

  Mr. Crane introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 For the relief of Dylan Brian Benwell.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATURALIZATION OF DYLAN BRIAN BENWELL.

    Notwithstanding the provisions of title III of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.), Dylan Brian Benwell, shall be 
held and considered to be a naturalized citizen of the United States as 
of the date of the enactment of this Act and shall be furnished by the 
Secretary of Homeland Security with a certificate of such 
naturalization.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Skagit State Bancorp, Inc.  on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), we, Cheryl Bishop, Chief Executive Officer, and Carla F.Tucker, Executive Vice-President/Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
| /s/ Cheryl R. Bishop      |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Cheryl R. Bishop          |   |
| Chief Executive Officer   |   |
|                      |   |
|                      |   |
| /s/ Carla F. Tucker       |   |
| Carla F. Tucker           |   |
| Executive  Vice-President |   |
| Chief Financial Officer   |   |
|                      |   |
|                      |   |
| November 13, 2009    |   |
| Date                      |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Airspan Networks Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Brant, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  March
      31, 2009
                /s/ David BrantDavid
      BrantChief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.2

CFO SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

PSi TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.

This certification is provided to PSi Technologies Holdings, Inc. (the Issuer) in connection with the preparation of the annual
report on Form 20-F/A (the Form 20-F/A) for the year ended December 31, 2004 of Issuer.

I, Thelma
G. Oribello, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer certify that:

(1) To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:

(i) the Form 20-F/A fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Form 20-F/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Issuer.

(2) I have reviewed the contents of this certificate with the Chief Executive Officer of
Issuer.

Dated: July 24, 2006.



/S/ THELMA G. ORIBELLOName: Thelma G. OribelloTitle: Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 136 (Friday, July 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17120]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 11785 and <greek-i> 11786]


South Dakota Disaster Number SD-00023

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of South Dakota 
(FEMA-1844-DR), dated 06/16/2009.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 03/11/2009 through 07/06/2009.
    Effective Date: 07/06/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 08/17/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/16/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of South 
Dakota, dated 06/16/2009, is hereby amended to establish the incident 
period for this disaster as beginning 03/11/2009 and continuing through 
07/06/2009.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-17120 Filed 7-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
U.S. Department of Justice

United States Attorney

District of New Jersey

970 Broad Street, Suite 700 (973)645-2700

Newark, NJ 07102

July 11, 2013

Honorable Stanley R. Chesler

United States District Judge

U.S. Post Office and Courthouse

Federal Square

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Re: United States v. Sixing Liu, a/k/a “Steve Liu”

Criminal No. 11-208 (SRC) 

 

Dear Judge Chesler:

Attached hereto is a proposed order of restitution in the above-referenced case. The

parties have agreed to the form and entry of the order. The Probation Office has received a copy

of the order and concurs. The entry of the order will avoid the necessity of a restitution hearing

to determine the amount of mandatory restitution. The Court has scheduled such a hearing to

commence on July 16, 2013. 

If a more formal submission is required, the government will provide one at the Court’s

direction. The undersigned Assistant United States Attorney may be reached at (973) 645-2735. 

Respectfully submitted,

PAUL J. FISHMAN

United States Attorney

/s/ L. Judson Welle

 By: L. JUDSON WELLE

 Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attachment

cc: James D. Tunick, Esq. (counsel for defendant Sixing Liu)

Randi Martorano, Senior United States Probation Officer

Case 2:11-cr-00208-SRC Document 144 Filed 07/11/13 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 2972
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Hon. Stanley R. Chesler

 

v. : Crim. No. 11-208 (SRC)

 

SIXING LIU : ORDER OF RESTITUTION

The defendant having been sentenced by the Court on

March 25, 2013, and the final determination of the amount of

mandatory restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 3663A having been

deferred pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3664(d)(5), and the United

States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (by L. Judson

Welle, Assistant U.S. Attorney) and defendant Sixing Liu (by

James Tunick, Esq.) having agreed that paragraph 34 of the final

presentence investigation accurately sets forth the amount of

mandatory restitution that is owed to Sensors in Motion based on

its present knowledge, and the United States Probation Office

having been consulted and concurring with the same, and based on

the findings set forth below which are uncontested by the

parties, and without prejudice or waiver to any claim, argument,

or ground involved in the defendant’s direct appeal from the

Judgment in this case, and for good cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that:

(1) Sensors In Motion is a victim within the meaning of

18 U.S.C. § 3663A(a)(2) with respect to Count Seven (Theft of

Trade Secrets) and Count Eight (Interstate Transportation of

Stolen Property) of the Second Superseding Indictment; 

Case 2:11-cr-00208-SRC Document 144 Filed 07/11/13 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 2973
Case 2:11-cr-00208-SRC Document 144 Filed 07/11/13 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 2974
Case 2:11-cr-00208-SRC Document 144 Filed 07/11/13 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 2975
#### Pounds *v.*The State.

Simmons, J. — Where, upon the trial of an indictment for rape alleged to have been committed upon a female between the ages of ten and eleven years, it appeared that sexual intercourse was accomplished, and the main question at issue, therefore, being whether the female was in fact capable of consenting to the act or not, and the court having several times, in substance, instructed the jury that although she was over ten «years old, yet if she was a child in stature, constitution and physical and mental development, and they believed from her age and appearance that she was incapable of consenting, the accused would be guilty, although she made no objection to the intercourse, it was also the duty of the court to charge the jury that if they believed she was capable of consenting and did actually consent, the accused should be acquitted. The failure to so charge is cause for a new trial in a close case like the present, taking this omission in connection with the fact that the court allowed the solicitor-general, in his concluding argument, to state to the jury, over objection of counsel for the accused, that “ the age of consent in many States is higher than in this State, and should be made higher here; and a committee of ladies waited on the judiciary committee of the last house of representatives and urged that the age of consent be raised to twelve years in this State.”

October 15, 1894.

Indictment for rape. Before Judge Janes. Haralson superior court. July term, 1894.

E. S. Grieeith and Edwards & Edwards, for plaintiff' in error. J. M. Terrell, attorney-general, and A. Richardson, solicitor-general, *contra.*

*Judgment reversed.*
exhibit10-9.htm


 











Exhibit 10.9


Director Compensation


 


Effective June 1, 2012, non-employee director compensation is as follows:


 



	  	 	 	 	 	
Committee Service

	 
	  	 	
Board Service

	 	 	
Audit

	 	 	
Compensation

	 	 	
Nominating and


Governance

	 
	
Annual retainer

	 	$	45,000	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
Restricted stock (value), one year vesting

	 	$	150,000	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
Committee chair annual retainer

	 	 	 	 	 	$	25,000	 	 	$	15,000	 	 	$	15,000	 
	
Committee chair restricted stock (value)

	 	 	 	 	 	$	25,000	 	 	$	15,000	 	 	$	15,000	 
	
Committee member annual retainer

	 	 	 	 	 	$	7,500	 	 	$	5,000	 	 	$	5,000	 
	
Meeting fee

	 	$	1,500	 	 	$	1,500	 	 	$	1,500	 	 	$	1,500
Philip Rosenbach, Esq. (PR-7672)

BERMAN ROSENBACH, P.C.

10 Madison Avenue, P.O. Box 1916

Morristown, New Jersey 07962-1916

(973) 206-8200

pr@brglaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Automotive Technologies International, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 

AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES

INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Plaintiff,

-vs.-

ONSTAR GLOBAL SERVICES

CORPORATION,

Defendants.

 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

CASE NO.: 2:11-cv-02490(SRC)(MAS)

Hon. Stanley R. Chesler

NOTICE OF MOTION TO AMEND

COMPLAINT

Return Date: August 15, 2011

TO: Michael E. Patunas

Mayra V. Tarantino

Lite Depalma Greenberg, LLC

Two Gateway Center, 12th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07101

Mark M. Supko

Jeffrey D. Ahdoot

Crowell & Moring LLP

1001 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington, DC 20004

Case 2:11-cv-02490-SRC-MAS Document 8 Filed 07/15/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 37
-2-

Please take notice that on June 15th, 2010, or as soon thereafter as counsel may

be heard, the undersigned attorneys for Plaintiff will move before the Honorable

Stanley R. Chesler, U.S.D.J., at the United States District Court for the District of

New Jersey, Martin Luther King, Jr. Federal Building,Room5054, 50 Walnut Street,

Newark, New Jersey for an order to allow plaintiff to amend its complaint to

substitute OnStar, LLC for Onstar Global Services Corporation as the defendant in

this matter. 

Using the best information at the time of filing, plaintiff believed OnStar

Global Services to be the proper defendant. Since the date of filing, it has come to

plaintiff’s attention that OnStar, LLC is the proper defendant to whom the complaint

should be addressed. The plaintiff therefore requests to amend the brief to include

OnStar, LLC as a defendant party pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 15(a)(2), because

twenty-one days have passed since the date of service for the first defendant. 

In support of this application, plaintiff relies on a Certification of Counsel

submitted herewith. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(4), no brief has been

submitted in support of this motion. Plaintiff believes a brief is not necessary for this

application because this application has been brought at the effective inception of this

case, this application has been filed only because the plaintiff falls outside the 21-day

time period set forth in Fed.R.Civ.Pro.15(a)(1)(B) by four days, and Fed.R.Civ.Pro.

Case 2:11-cv-02490-SRC-MAS Document 8 Filed 07/15/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 38
-3-

15(a)(2) states that “[t]he court should freely give leave when justice so requires”

with regard to requests to amend pleadings. 

Please take further notice that a proposed form of Order is also submitted

herewith. 

BERMAN ROSENBACH, P.C.

10 Madison Avenue, P.O. Box 1916

Morristown, New Jersey 07962-1916

(973) 206-8200

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Automotive Technology International, Inc.

By: /s/ Philip Rosenbach 

 Philip Rosenbach

pr@brglaw.com

July 15, 2011

Michael J. Mehrman, Esq.

MERHMAN LAW OFFICE, P.C.

P.O. Box 420797

Atlanta, Georgia 30342

404 497 7400 (phone)

404 420 2435 (facsimile)

mike@merhmanlaw.com

Case 2:11-cv-02490-SRC-MAS Document 8 Filed 07/15/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 39
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5303 

To provide for the establishment of a Department of Veterans Affairs Community-Based Outpatient Clinic (CBOC) for veterans on the grounds of 

the Navy Supply Corps School in Athens, Georgia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2004 

Mr. BURNS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for the establishment of a Department of Veterans Affairs Community-Based Outpatient Clinic 

(CBOC) for veterans on the grounds of the Navy Supply 

Corps School in Athens, Georgia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS COMMU4 NITY-BASED OUTPATIENT CLINIC, NAVY SUP5 PLY CORPS SCHOOL, ATHENS, GEORGIA. 

6 (a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of 

7 Veterans Affairs is authorized— 
2 

•HR 5303 IH 

1 (1) to work with the Secretary of the Navy in 

2 developing on the grounds of the Navy Supply Corps 

3 School in Athens, Georgia, a site suitable for a med4 ical facility; and 

5 (2) to construct on that site a joint Navy-De6 partment of Veterans Affairs Community-Based 

7 Outpatient Clinic, as called for in the Capital Asset 

8 Realignment for Enhanced Services (CARES) stra9 tegic plan approved by the Secretary of Veterans Af10 fairs. 

11 (b) FUNDING.—There are authorized to be appro12 priated such sums as may be necessary for the purposes 

13 of subsection (a). 

14 (c) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section: 

15 (1) The term ‘‘medical facility’’ has the mean16 ing given that term in section 8101(3) of title 38, 

17 United States Code. 

18 (2) The term ‘‘Community-Based Outpatient 

19 Clinic’’ has the meaning given that term in the De20 partment of Veterans Affairs’ Capital Asset Realign21 ment for Enhanced Services (CARES) strategic 

22 plan. 

Æ