alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

The Board of DirectorsClick Commerce, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-118951) and Form S-8(Nos. 333-70084, 333-54432 and 333-107485) of Click Commerce, Inc. ofour reports dated March 21, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balancesheet of Click Commerce, Inc. as of December 31, 2004, and therelated consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss),shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-yearperiod ended December 31, 2004 and the related consolidated financialstatement schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annualreport on Form 10-K of Click Commerce, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, IllinoisMarch 30, 2006

----
Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB   Document 52   Filed 05/03/11   Page 1 of 1 PageID: 269
Bailey & Orozco, LLC :
Michael Orozco, Attomey for Defendant
744 Broad Street, Suite 1901
Newark, N.J. 07102

(973) 693-4408

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA . : .
Case No.: 11-735

ZADME GA CONSENT ORDER SETTING
AMENDED CONDITIONS OF BAIL

‘The Court orders the defendant's bail conditions, previously set on June 8*, 2011,

and then further amended by way of a consent order on October 14, 2011, be amended by

‘way of agreement between the defendant and the Government es set forth below:

Defendant’s curfew shall be extended to 8:00 pm daily so as to allow ‘him
visitation with his youngest child.’ :

All other bail conditions shall remain in full force and effect
SO ORDERED ‘ .

etimha Or,

Agreed as to form: : ~

i
i!
#### HSBC Bank USA, N.A., Respondent, v Bruno Decaudin et al., Defendants, and Naida I. Velazquez, Appellant.

[854 NYS2d 184]

*695A motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) may be granted only where “the documentary evidence that forms the basis of the defense [is] such that it resolves all factual issues as a matter of law, and conclusively disposes of the plaintiffs claims” *(Saxony Ice Co., Div. of Springfield Ice Co., Inc. v Ultimate Energy Rest. Corp.,*27 AD3d 445, 446 [2006]; *see Museum Trading Co. v Bantry,*281 AD2d 524, 525 [2001]). The documentary evidence submitted by the defendant Naida I. Velazquez was sufficient to demonstrate that the subject conveyance to the defendant Bruno Decaudin was unauthorized. The conveyance was made by one of the two attorneys-in-fact of Velazquez’s mother, in disregard of the requirement set forth in the power of attorney that they “act together” *(see Unterberg v Elder,*211 NY 499 [1914]; General Obligations Law § 5-1501 [3]; 1-11 Warren’s Weed, New York Real Property, Attorney-in-Fact § 11.25 [5th ed]). Nonetheless, an unauthorized conveyance may be ratified by the subsequent acts of the principal *(see Lipman v Vebeliunas,*39 AD3d 488, 490 [2007]; *Alexandru v Berritt,*168 AD2d 472, 474 [1990]; *Rende & Esposito Consultants v St. Augustine’s R. C. Church,*131 AD2d 740, 743 [1987]; *Diocese of Buffalo v McCarthy,*91 AD2d 213 [1983]). Since the documentary evidence does not establish the absence of ratification, the motion was properly denied.

Velazquez’s remaining contentions are without merit. Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Balkin, JJ., concur.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-3895

___________ United States of America, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Timothy James Dowdle, * [PUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: June 22, 2000 Filed: June 30, 2000

___________ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, FAGG and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Timothy James Dowdle was in state custody on commercial burglary and theft of property charges when he was indicted on a federal possession of stolen mail charge. Dowdle pleaded guilty to the federal charge and was sentenced to twenty-four months imprisonment

and three years supervised release. After the federal sentencing, Dowdle pleaded guilty to the state charges and was sentenced to five years to run concurrently with the federal sentence. The state judge made a notation on Dowdle's criminal docketsheet that the state relinquished custody of Dowdle to the federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP). When the BOP refused to accept custody, Dowdle filed a motion-2-

asking the federal district court to determine whether he was in federal or state custody. The district court found that the state judge's notation on Dowdle's docket sheet validly relinquished the state's custody and that the BOP had primary custody of Dowdle for the duration of his federal sentence. The Government appeals, arguing the state judge lacked authority to relinquish state jurisdiction over Dowdle. We agree. As the sovereign that first arrested Dowdle, the state had primary jurisdiction which it could "elect under the doctrine of comity to relinquish [] to [the United States]," but the "discretionary election is an executive, and not a judicial, function." UnitedStates v. Warren , 610 F.2d 680, 685 (9th Cir. 1980); accord Ponzi v. Fessenden , 258 U.S. 254, 261-62 (1922). Because the state's jurisdiction was relinquished by a state judge, rather than the prosecutor or a representative of the state executive branch, the relinquishment

was ineffective and Dowdle's status as a state prisoner was unchanged. See Ponzi , 258 U.S. at 261-62 (in federal system, power and discretion to practice comity vested in Attorney General); Del Guzzi v. United States , 980 F.2d 1269, 1270 (9th Cir. 1992) (per curiam) (state sentencing judge's authority limited to sending defendant to state prison); cf. 18 U.S.C. § 3623 (1994) (federal Bureau of Prisons may transfer federal prisoner to state for state prosecution if "transfer has been requested by the Governor or other executive authority of the State"). We thus reverse the order of the district court directing Dowdle into the custody of the BOP. A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Jan Aaron Sigurgeirson, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Coastal Media Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
7th day of November, 2006.


/s/ Jan Aaron Sigurgeirson
------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Click Commerce, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael W. Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed as part of
the Form 10-K.

|Date: March 21, 2005 |  | /s/MICHAEL W. NELSONChief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

:

CHARLES DOGAN, :

:

Petitioner, : Civil No. 11-3383 (JBS)

:

v. :

:

BUREAU OF PRISONS, : ORDER

:

Respondent. :

:

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion filed

on this date,

IT IS on this 3rd day of January , 2012,

ORDERED that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order and

the accompanying Opinion by regular mail upon the parties, and

shall close the file.

s/ Jerome B. Simandle 

JEROME B. SIMANDLE

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-03383-JBS Document 9 Filed 02/03/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 86
Oxy Ex 10.4 10K 12.31.2012






EXHIBIT 10.4


AMENDMENT 
TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made as of the 25th day of February, 2013 by and between Occidental Petroleum Corporation, a Delaware corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Employer”), and Donald P. de Brier (hereinafter referred to as “Employee”).
WITNESSETH


WHEREAS, Employee has been rendering services to Employer, most recently pursuant to a written agreement between Employee and Employer dated October 9, 2008 (the “Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the Agreement in certain respects;


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein, Employer and Employee hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:


1.    Employer and Employee acknowledge that Employee's position now is Corporate Executive Vice President and Corporate Secretary.


2.    In accordance with the Paragraphs 2 and 9 of the Agreement, the term of employment under the Agreement is extended to midnight December 31, 2014, unless terminated prior thereto in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement, or unless extended by mutual agreement in accordance with Paragraphs 2 and 9 of the Agreement.


3.    As amended by this Amendment, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect for the extended term described in the preceding paragraph.  The provisions of Paragraphs 9 through 14 of the Agreement shall apply to this Amendment, but with all references to the Agreement being deemed to refer to this Amendment.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment the day and year first above written.




	
				
	 
	/s/ DONALD P. DE BRIER
	 

	 
	Donald P. de Brier


	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION



	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ MARTIN A. COZYN
	 

	 
	 
	Martin A. Cozyn,
Executive Vice President - Human Resources
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v. :Crim, No. 11-341 (SDW)
LAWRENCE J. BROWN “CONTINUANCE ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of Paul J. Fishman, United
States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (by Mala Ahuja Harker, Assistant U.S. Attomey),
and defendant Lawrence J. Brown (by Patrick McMahon, Esq.) for an order granting a continuance
of the proceedings in the above-captioned matter for a period of 14 days to allow the parties to
conduct plea negotiations and attempt to finalize a plea agreement, and two continuances having
previously been granted by the Court pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section
3161(h)(7)(A), so that the parties could attempt to resolve the matter and thereby. avoid a possible
trial, and the defendant being aware that he has the right to have the matter tried within seventy
days of the date of his arraignment pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(b), and
the defendant having consented to the continuance and waived such right, and for good cause
shown,

It IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should be continued for the
following reasons:

(1) Plea negotiations are currently in progress, and both the United States and

the defendant desire additional time to negotiate a plea agreement, which would render a trial of

this matter unnecessary;


my Pursuantto Te 18 United Sates Code, Section 3161(H( 7) the ends of sis

served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a

speedy trial. . oth
IT IS, therefore, on this / day of January, 2012,

ORDERED that this action be, and it hereby is, continued for a period of 14 days
from January 19, 2012 through and including February 2, 2012; and it is further
ORDERED that the period from January 19, 2019 through and including February

2, 2012 shall be excludable in computing time und

n, Esq.
Counsel for defendant La J, Brown
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

KIMBERLEE WILLIAMS, ET AL., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

BASF CATALYSTS LLC, ET AL., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No: 11-cv-1754 (JLL) (JAD) 

STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT 

GLENN A. HEMSTOCK. 

Whereas the parties acting through undersigned counsel agree to a voluntary dismissal of 

the Plantiffs' claims against Defendant Glenn A. Hemstock, PhD ("Hemstock"} pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED: 

1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A), Plaintiffs Kimberlee 

Williams, Nancy Pease, Marilyn L. Holley, Donna Ware, Donnette Wengerd and Rosanne 

Chernick (colledivey "Plantiffs") aid Defendant Hemstock by and through the undersigned 

counsel, hereby stipulate that all claims asserted by Plaintiffs against Defendant Hemstock, and 

only those against Hemstock, are dismissed in their entirety without prejudice, with each party to 

bear own costs. 

2. In consideration for being voluntarily dismissed, Hemstock agrees that to the 

extent his health and circumstances reasonably permit he will cooperate with the remaining parties 

in providing, on notice to all parties, discoverable documents in his possession or control or 

testimony, including deposition testimony, without the necessity of being subpoenaed. 

Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-ESK Document 195 Filed 04/18/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 6160
Dated: April 13, 2016 

/SI Christopher M. Placitella 

Christopher M. Placitella 

Michael Coren 

Jared M. Placitella 

COHEN, PLACITELLA & ROTH P.C. 

27 Maple Ave. 

Red Bank, NJ 07701 

747-9003 

and 

Jeffrey M. Pollock 

ROTHSCHILD LLP 

Princeton Pike Cmp. Center 

Lennox Drive, Building 3 

Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 

( 609) 896-7 660 

Attorneys for Plaint~ffs 

Dated: April/jt2016. 

So stipulated and agreed: 

Isl Walter R. Krzastek Jr. 

Walter R. Krzastek, Jr. 

Michael B. Devins 

McELROY, DEUTSCH, MULVANEY AND 

CARPENTER, LLP 

1300 Mount Kemble Ave. 

PO Box 2075 

Morristown, NJ 07962-2075 

973-993-8100 

Attorneys for Defendant Glenn A. Hems tock 

SO ORDERED BY T 

Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-ESK Document 195 Filed 04/18/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 6161
PROR 12C

(7/93)

United States District Court

for

District of New Jersey

Petition for Warrant or Summons for Offender Under Supervision

Name of Offender: Reynaldo Martinez Docket Number: 1 1-O019O001

PACTS Number: 56521

Name of Judicial Officer: Honorable Dickinson R. Debevoise

Senior United States District Judge

Name of Sentencing Judicial Officer: Honorable Andre M. Davis

United States District Judge. D/MD

Date of Original Sentence: April 25, 2003

Original Offense: Possession with Intent to Distribute Narcotics

Original Sentence: 100 months imprisonment; 4 years supervised release; $100 Special Assessment.

Type of Supervision: supervised release Date Supervision Commenced: 10/01/10

Assistant U.S. Attorney: To be assigned

Defense Attorney: To be assigned

PETITIONING THE COURT

[ j To issue a warrant

[X] To issue a summons

The probation officer believes that the offender has violated the following condition(s) of supervision:

Violation Number Nature of Noncompliance

The offender has violated the standard supervision condition which states ‘You

shall not commit another federal, state, or local crime.’

On October 22, 2012, the offender was arrested by the Jersey City Police

Department and charged with possession of CDS; manufacture/distribute CDS;

and. CDS on school property.

The offender has violated the standard supervision condition which states You

shall not associate with any persons engaged in criminal activity, and shall

not associate with any person convicted ofa felony unless granted permission

to do so by the probation officer.’

On October 22. 2012. the offender was arrested with Raymond Rodriguez, a

convicted felon.
PROB 12C - Page 2

Reynaldo Martinez

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

GiseHa M.

Bassohno

2013,01.15

11:34:36 -0500

By: Gisella M. Bassolino Carolee Ann Az2arello U S ProbataotQf 20130116132303

Date: 1/15/13

THE COURT ORDERS:

I The Issuance of a Warrant

[J The Issuance of a Summons. Date of Hearing: iJ iw

[ I No Action

[ I Other 1

/ 1

f

Signature ofJudicial Officer

J

i--yi

/ Date
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Grace 3, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas A. Dyer,
Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




Dated:  May
      _______ 2010
              GRACE
      3, INC.By: /s/ DOUGLAS A. DYERDouglas
      A. DyerPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)(Principal
      Financial Officer)
|        | Principal Officers: Keith M. Braaten, P. Eng.  President & CEOJodi L. Anhorn, P. Eng.  Executive Vice President & COO                                                                                                                                   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | Officers / Vice Presidents: Terry L. Aarsby, P. Eng.Caralyn P. Bennett, P. Eng.Leonard L. Herchen, P. Eng.Myron J. Hladyshevsky, P. Eng.Bryan M. Joa, P. Eng.Mark Jobin, P. Geol.John E. Keith, P. Eng.John H. Stilling, P. Eng.Douglas R. Sutton, P. Eng.James H. Willmon, P. Eng. |

|   | Yours very truly,GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.“Originally Signed by”Jason Paul, P. Eng.Manager, Engineering |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Pinnacle Gas Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending June 30,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Peter G. Schoonmaker, President and Chief Executive Officerof the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  August14, 2007
|        | /s/ Peter  G. Schoonmaker             |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Peter G. Schoonmaker                  |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----