alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in open session at 11:30 a.m. on Thursday, July 2, 2009, to consider the following matter: 

## Discussion Agenda 

Memorandum and resolution re: Policy on Investment in, or Acquisition of, Failing Insured Depository Institutions. 

The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 

                    This Board meeting will be Webcast live via the Internet and subsequently made available on-demand approximately one week after the event. Visit                     *http://www.vodium.com/​goto/​fdic/​boardmeetings.asp*                     to view the event. If you need any technical assistance, please visit our Video Help page at:                     *http://www.fdic.gov/​video.html.*

                    The FDIC will provide attendees with auxiliary aids (                    *e.g.*, sign language interpretation) required for this meeting. Those attendees needing such assistance should call (703) 562-6067 (Voice or TTY), to make necessary arrangements.                 

Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at (202) 898-7043. 

Dated: June 25, 2009. 

Valerie J. Best, 

Assistant Executive Secretary, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

[FR Doc. E9-15505 Filed 6-29-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P
Case 2:11-cr-00200-SDW Document 6 Filed 04/04/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 27
Case 2:11-cr-00200-SDW Document 6 Filed 04/04/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 28
Case 2:11-cr-00200-SDW Document 6 Filed 04/04/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 29
**Exhibit 23.3**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDCHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS**
We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statements No. 333-113054, 333-143029 and333-151943 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 26, 2009, relating tothe consolidated financial statements of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (which reportexpressed an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraphregarding conditions and events that cast substantial doubt on theCompany’s ability to continue as a going concern), and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Reporton Form 10-K of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008.
(signed) “Deloitte &Touche LLP”
Independent Registered CharteredAccountants
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5021 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5021

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pepperoncini prepared or 
 preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid in concentrations 
                             less than .5%.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 7, 2004

 Mr. Pascrell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pepperoncini prepared or 
 preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid in concentrations 
                             less than .5%.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PEPPERONCINI PREPARED OR PRESERVED OTHERWISE THAN BY 
              VINEGAR OR ACETIC ACID IN CONCENTRATIONS LESS THAN .5%.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.20.07       Pepperoncini,      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         prepared or                                                        31/2007
                         preserved
                         otherwise than by
                         vinegar or acetic
                         acid in
                         concentrations
                         less than .5%
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2005.90.97)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:10-cr-00440-WHW Document 9 Filed 11/23/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 23
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40334 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. GERARDO ROJO-MARTINEZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-730-1
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Gerardo Rojo-Martinez appeals the sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to illegally reentering the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). He argues that the district court acted unreasonably in upwardly departing from the advisory guidelines range when imposing his sentence. He also challenges the extent of the upward departure. Because the district court departed upward pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3, Ro jo-Martinez received a guidelines sentence rather than a non-guidelines United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November 28, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-40334

2 sentence. See United States v. Smith, 440 F.3d 704, 707 (5th Cir. 2006); United States v. Torres-Aguilar, 352 F.3d 934, 935-36 (5th Cir. 2003). We review the decision of the sentencing court to depart for abuse of discretion, ultimately determining whether the sentence is unreasonabl e under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Zuniga-Peralta, 442 F.3d 345, 347 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 2954 (2006). We review the extent of the departure for plain error because it was not objected to by Rojo-Martinez in the district court. See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 731-37 (1993). The district court did not abuse its discretion in upwardly departing from the recommended guidelines range. Its decision took into account the factors identified in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2), including the need to promote respect for the law, the need for adequate deterrence, and the need to protect the public from future crimes by Rojo-Martinez. See § 4 A1.3(a)(1). In addition, the leniency ofRojo-Martinez’s prior sentenceswas an appropriate consideration by the district court in considering the upward departure. See § 4A1.3, comment. Moreover, Rojo-Martinez’s argument that any sentence of imprisonment would have been an adequate deterrent to him committing future crimes is belied by the fact that he served 30 days in prison during May and June of 2006 on a probation revocation but illegally reentered the United States only months later, in October 2006, in connection with the instant offense. Rojo-Martinez’s sentence is nine months higher than the highest sentence that could have been imposed under theadvisory guidelines range. Based on the record facts cited by the district court, the extent ofthedeparturewaswithin the discretion of the district court. See Z uniga-Peralta, 442 F.3d at 347. Accordingly, there was no plain error regarding the extent of the upward departure, and Rojo-Martinez’s sentence is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION****OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the yearly report of China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Zhilin Li, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley        Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.                 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Pharma Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by China Pharma Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

|  |   |   | Date: March 4, 2010     |   |   |
|--|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|  |        |   |                         |        |        |
|  |   |   | By: /s/ Zhilin Li       |   |   |
|  |   |   | Zhilin Li               |   |   |
|  |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
Exhibit 13.2



LION BIOSCIENCE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of LION bioscience Aktiengesellschaft (the Company) on Form 20-F/A for the period ending
March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin Hollenhorst, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2003 and results of
operations of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2003.



/s/    Martin HollenhorstName:

Martin HollenhorstTitle:

Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




Date:    April 20, 2004
```

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Certification of chief FINANCIAL officer

In connection with the Annual Report of Tekron, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Lugi Brun, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

        (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.

/s/ Luigi Brun
    Luigi Brun Chief Financial Officer
    July 11, 2003
```
Exhibit 10.40


 


 


 


Non-Employee Director
Compensation 


 


The Chairman of the Board of
Directors receives an annual retainer of $120,000 for his services as Chairman
and his attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors and committees of the
Board. Each other non-employee director (the “non-employee directors”) receives
an annual retainer of $60,000 for his or her services as a director.  In
addition, the Chairman of the Board of Directors receives an annual grant of
restricted stock with a value equal to $135,000, and each other non-employee
director receives an annual grant of restricted stock with a value equal to $100,000.
Chairmen of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees
receive an annual retainer of $35,000, $25,000 and $20,000, respectively.
Non-chair members of the Audit Committee receive an annual retainer of $20,000,
and non-chair members of the Compensation and Nominating and Governance
Committee receive an annual retainer of $10,000 and $7,500, respectively. 


 


From time to time, the Board of
Directors of the Company may form ad hoc committees. Each non-employee director
who serves on an ad hoc committee receives $1,000 for each meeting of the ad
hoc committee that he or she attends, whether in person or via telephone, except
that the Chair of any ad hoc committee receives $2,000 for each such meeting
that he or she attends. 


 


The Company maintains a
supplemental executive and director retirement savings plan pursuant to which
non-employee directors may defer up to 100 percent of their cash director fees
and make pre-tax contributions to an investment account established in their
name.  Participants in the supplemental executive and director retirement
savings plan are fully vested in their contributions to the plan, and direct
the investment of their accounts in investment alternatives that the Company
selects.  All contributions to the plan are subject to claims of our creditors.


 


The Company also reimburses each
non-employee director for his or her out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
attending Board of Directors’ meetings and committee meetings.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Imad Kamel Yassine, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Bioshaft Water
      Technology, Inc. for the period ended July 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc..                                                               

Dated: September 19, 2011



| | Imad Kamel Yassine                                                
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Imad Kamel Yassine                                                  
| | Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial
      Officer, Secretary   
| | Treasurer and Director                                              
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer)
| | Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc.                                     



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Bioshaft Water
Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
911 A.2d 66

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ALLEN BENOWITZ, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

November 22, 2006.

ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, limited solely to defendant’s sentence. On that issue, the matter is summarily remanded to the trial court for resentencing in light of the Court’s decisions in *State v. Natale,*184 *N.J.*458, 878 A.2d 724 (2005) and *State v. Pierce,*188 *N.J.*155, 902 A.2d 1195 (2006).
May 17, 2018

VIA EMAIL

Justice Roberto A. Rivera-Soto (ret.)

Special Discovery Master

Ballard Spahr LLP

210 Lake Drive East, Suite 200

Cherry Hill, NJ 08002-1163

riverasotor@ballardspahr.com

Re: Williams v. BASF Catalysts LLC, No. 11-1754

Amendment of ECF 403 -Order re: ECF 383

Dear Justice Rivera-Soto:

Plaintiffs and BASF are writing to Your Honor regarding (1) the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition 

of BASF’s corporate representative and (2) Plaintiffs’ responses to BASF’s requests for 

admission. 

By way of background, on April 9, 2018, Plaintiffs served a 30(b)(6) notice to BASF that 

included 60 topics. On April 19, 2018, BASF objected on the grounds that Plaintiffs’ notice was 

overbroad, unduly burdensome, not proportional, and sought privileged information. On May 8, 

2018, the parties met and conferred about Plaintiffs’ notice. During that discussion, Plaintiffs 

explained that they would be serving an amended notice that, in Plaintiffs’ view, would address 

BASF’s concerns about the April 9, 2018 notice. On May 8, 2018, plaintiffs served an amended 

30(b)(6) notice setting forth 14 topics, which was further reduced to 11 topics by a second 

amended notice on May 10th.

In subsequent meet and confer discussions, BASF stated that it could not reasonably 

prepare a witness on the topics contained in the May 10th notice because of the limited time left 

in fact discovery. Plaintiffs and BASF therefore agreed that the 30 (b)((6) examination could go 

forward after May 21, 2018, subject to the Court’s approval, so that BASF would have adequate 

time to prepare the witness. Plaintiffs and BASF therefore respectfully request that leave be 

granted so that the deposition of BASF’s 30(b)(6) designee can occur after May 21. Plaintiffs 

and BASF expect that the deposition would occur no later than June 6, 2018.

Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 520 Filed 05/17/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 30480
Justice Robert A. Rivera-Soto (ret.)

May 17, 2018

Page 2

Plaintiffs and BASF also discussed Plaintiffs’ responses to BASF’s requests for 

admission, which were served upon each of the Plaintiffs on April 20, 2018. Plaintiffs’

responses currently are due on May 21, 2018. Because discovery remains ongoing, and to 

facilitate a review of those requests and the preparation of responses, Plaintiffs requested a twoweek extension of time to respond. BASF agreed to that extension, subject to the Court’s 

approval. Plaintiffs therefore request, with BASF’s consent, that a two-week extension be 

granted so that Plaintiffs’ responses are due on Monday, June 4, 2018. 

Thank you for your kind consideration of this request.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Christopher M. Placitella

Christopher M. Placitella

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

and the Proposed Class

cc: Defense Counsel of Record (via email)

Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 520 Filed 05/17/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 30481
***Exhibit 32.1*****Section 1350 Certification**The undersigned hereby certify that, to their knowledge, **(i)**the Form 10-Q filed byYadkin Valley Financial Corporation (the “Issuer”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2006,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and **(ii)**the information contained in that report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theIssuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.         **Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation**         Date: August 14, 2006 By: /s/ William A. Long           William A. Long    President and Chief Executive Officer           By: /s/ Edwin E. Laws           Edwin E. Laws    Chief Financial Officer  Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
#### RICKENBACHER TRANSP., Inc., v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Sept. 9, 1942.

Abram A. Golden, of Newark, N. J., for plaintiff.

Burlingham, Veeder, Clark & Hupper, of New York City, for defendant

CONGER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, in the above entitled negligence action brought to recover - damages for injuries to personal property, moves under Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for an order directing that the issues of liability and damages be tried separately. The defendant has demanded that these issues be tried by a jury, and under ordinary circumstances separate trials of such issues *would*serve *no*useful purpose but would hamper and impede the proper administration of justice. Issues should not be tried piecemeal unless necessary to prevent undue delay or to promote the interests of justice. Collins v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp., 106 F.2d 83.

*203However, in the case at bar the facts are such as to warrant that the issue of liability be tried and determined before the issue of plaintiff’s damages. The cause of action arose as the result of a grade crossing accident involving one of the defendant’s trains and a trailer truck owned by the plaintiff, Rickenbacher Transportation, Inc. The accident took place in Ohio at a time when the truck was loaded with thirty-five separate and distinct shipments from thirty-five consignors, located in a number of different states. To prove damages to the truck and cargo the plaintiff will have to produce in Court or take the depositions of the persons who handled and disposed of the wreckage as well as the thirty-five different consignors. This would impose an undue burden and expense on the plaintiff and would seriously inconvenience the various witnesses if after proving damages it should be determined that the defendant is not liable for such damages.

In furtherance of convenience, therefore, it would be better if the issue of liability is tried and determined first. This carries with it also the determination of defendant’s counterclaim. Particularly is this so where, as here, the defendant has failed to show it will be seriously prejudiced in any way by a separate trial of these two issues. Accordingly, the motion for a separate trial of the issue of liability and the issue of plaintiff’s damages is granted.

Settle order on notice.