alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KIMERLY JOYNES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 66 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 2018, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
Case 2:11-cr-00163-FSH Document 31 Filed 03/21/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 52
Case 2:11-cr-00163-FSH Document 31 Filed 03/21/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 53
Exhibit 31.1
 MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Primo Water Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent quarter (the
registrants fourth quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 /s/ Billy D. PrimDate: May 13, 2011
    Billy D. PrimChairman, Chief Executive Officer
and President
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-10425 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TED CALVIN BLAND, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CR-191-1-E

-------------------- March 19, 2001 Before REAVLEY, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ted Calvin Bland appeals his convictions for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Bland argues that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional on its face because it fails to require a “substantial effect” on interstate commerce. He also contends that the Government should be required to prove the knowledge element of the same statute. Bland concedes that his arguments are foreclosed by this court’s precedent and indicates they are presented here solely for issue preservation purposes.No. 00-10425 -2- The “in or affecting commerce” element of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) requires only a minimal nexus between the firearm and interstate commerce. United States v. Gresham , 118 F.3d 258, 265 (5th Cir. 1997). This element is satisfied because the firearms possessed by Bland previously traveled in interstate commerce. United States v. Rawls , 85 F.3d 240, 242 (5th Cir. 1996). Knowledge of a legal obligation is not an element of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). United States v. Dancy , 861 F.2d 77, 82 (5th Cir. 1988). Recent decisions by the Supreme Court do not alter this court’s jurisprudence regarding 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)’s minimal interstate-nexus or knowledge requirements. Accordingly, Bland’s convictions are AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

STEVE LUECKE and DEB LUECKE, h/w 

Plaintiff

 vs.

SAGE CAPITAL RECOVERY, LLC

Defendant

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 11-cv-03144

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2011, it is hereby Stipulated and Agreed by 

and between counsel for plaintiff and counsel for defendant in the above captioned matter 

that the above captioned matter be dismissed with prejudice.

Warren & Vullings, LLP

 BY:__/s/ Bruce K. Warren

Bruce K. Warren, Esquire

Attorney for Plaintiff

Sessions, Fishman, Nathan & Israel, LLC

 BY:__/s/ Ross S. Enders

Ross S. Enders, Esquire

Attorney for Defendant 

Case 1:11-cv-03144-NLH-JS Document 10 Filed 08/31/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 39
Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 9 Filed 09/07/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 84
Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 9 Filed 09/07/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 85
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
 AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), DOT.
 ACTION: List of applications delayed more than 180 days.
 SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(c), PHMSA is publishing the following list of special permit applications that have been in process for 180 days or more. 
                        ( print page 35229)
                        The reason(s) for delay and the expected completion date for action on each application is provided in association with each identified application.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Delmer F. Billings, Director, Office of Hazardous Materials Special Permits and Approvals, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, East Building, PHH-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, Southeast, Washington, DC 20590-0001, (202) 366-4535. Key to “Reason for Delay” 1. Awaiting additional information from applicant. 2. Extensive public comment under review. 3. Application is technically complex and is of significant impact or precedent-setting and requires extensive analysis. 4. Staff review delayed by other priority issues or volume of special permit applications. Meaning of Application Number Suffixes N—New application. M—Modification request. PM—Party to application with modification request. Issued in Washington, DC, on July 10, 2009. Delmer Billings, Director, Office of Hazardous Materials, Special Permits and Approvals.
 Modification to Special Permits
Application No.
Applicant
Reason for delay
Estimated date 
                                 of completion14167-M
Trinityrail Dallas, TX
4
08-01-200914467-M
Brenner Tank, LLC Fond Du Lac, WI
1,4
10-01-200914436-M
BNSF Railway Company Topeka, KS
4
10-01-2009**New Special Permit Applications**14733-N
GTM Technologies, Inc. San Francisco, CA
1,3
10-01-2009


[FR Doc. E9-17074 Filed 7-17-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-60-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Penn Virginia GP Holdings, L.P. (the
Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank A. Pici, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PVG GP,
LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                           
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: August 2, 2007 |  |                                           
|                     | 
|                     |  | /s/ Frank A. Pici                         
|                     |  | Frank A. Pici                             
|                     |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit
to the Report. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to China Healthcare Acquisition Corp., including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of China Healthcare Acquisition Corp.s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in China Healthcare Acquisition Corp.s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during China Healthcare
Acquisition Corp.s most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, China Healthcare Acquisition Corp.s internal
control over financial reporting.
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect China Healthcare Acquisition Corp.s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in China Healthcare Acquisition Corp.s internal controls
over financial reporting.
 Date:
June 4, 2007
    
    /s/ Steven WangSteven Wang, Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# Date and Time:

 Tuesday, July 14, 2009, 10:30 a.m. Wednesday, July 15, 2009, 10 a.m.

# Place:

 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# Status:

 This meeting will be closed to the public.

# Items To Be Discussed:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. § 437g. Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. § 437g, § 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C. Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration. Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# Date and Time:

 Thursday, July 16, 2009, at 10 a.m.

# Place:

 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# Status:

 This meeting will be open to the public.

# Items To Be Discussed:

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

# Draft Advisory Opinion 2009-13:

 The Black Rock Group, by WiIIam J. McGinley, Esq. Report of the Audit Division on Edwards for President. Final Rule on Transfer of Motor Voter Regulations to the EAC. Presidential Debates Rulemaking Petitions—Suggested Disposition. 

# Proposed Rule of Agency Procedures:

 Notice to Respondents in Non-Complaint Generated Matters.

# Proposed Rule of Agency Procedures:

 Notice to Named Respondents of Additional Material Facts or Additional Potential Violations.

# Proposed Rule of Agency Procedures:

 Notice to Potential Respondents in Enforcement.

# Proposed Rule of Agency Procedures:

 Modification of Procedural Rules for Probable Cause Hearings.

Management and Administrative Matters.

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Mary Dove, Commission Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-16701 Filed 7-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
#### Johnson *v.*The State.

Simmons, C. J. — 1. The grounds of the motion for a new trial, so far as they relate to the overruling of the motion for a continuance, not being approved by the judge otherwise than by reference to a stenographic report of the evidence introduced in support of the motion to continue, are not verified in such manner as to require consideration by this court. Even if they had been properly verified, it would not appear that the court erred in refusing a continuance; the absence of the alleged leading counsel of the accused not being sufficiently accounted for; and it not being in the least probable that he would ever be able to procure the attendance of the absent witness, who resided in Rhode Island, and on account of whose absence the case had been continued at the preceding term. •

2. The ground of the motion assigning error upon the charge of the *500court upon the subject of the character of the accused for peaceableness was not approved at all, and therefore cannot be considered. The request to charge upon this subject was argumentative, and stated the law too favorably for the accused. The other requests to charge, including one with reference to the law of reasonable doubt, were, so far as legal and pertinent, covered by the general charge of the court.

3. Where during the progress of a trial the court refused to allow the introduction of certain evidence on the ground that the same was irrelevant, and afterwards this evidence in the opinion of the judge becoming relevant on account of the introduction of other testimony and being then admitted, the refusal to admit it when first offered is not cause for a new trial, even if it was really relevant when so offered.

4. The evidence being such that the jury might have found the accused guilty of the crime of murder, and the verdict being for voluntary manslaughter, the accused has in this respect no cause of complaint. There was no error in refusing a new trial.

February 5, 1895.

By two Justices.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Hunt. Dodge superior court. September term, 1894.

J. W. Preston and E. T. Davis, for plaintiff’ in error.

J. M. Terrell, attorney-general, and Tom Eason, solicitor-general, *contra.*

*Judgment affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of USA Video Interactive Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edwin Molina, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   By: /s/Edwin Molina Edwin Molina, Chief Executive Officer March 31st, 2010
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MARTIN CARRILLO-CASTANEDA,

a.k.a. Martin Carillo, a.k.a. Marty Carrillo,

a.k.a. Spanky, a.k.a Rodolfo Valdez,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50294

D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00138-ODW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Martin Carrillo-Castaneda appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 21-

month sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California,

FILED

JUN 24 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50294

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Carrillo-Castaneda’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are

no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We

have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental

brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

JOE CASTILLO :

:

:

 

Plaintiff, :

:

Case No. 11-1296 (PGS)

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER

Defendant. :

Having considered the application to proceed without prepayment of fees under 28 U.S.C.

§1915; it is on this 10 day of March, 2011 th

ORDERED that the application is:

__X_ GRANTED, and the clerk is directed to file the complaint; and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk issue summons to be served by the

plaintiffs attorney upon defendants with copies of the Complaint and this Order.

_____ DENIED, for the following reasons:

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

s/Peter G. Sheridan 

PETER G. SHERIDAN, U.S.D.J. 

Case 2:11-cv-01296-ES Document 2 Filed 03/10/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 8
Case 2:11-cv-01296-ES Document 2 Filed 03/10/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 9
Opinion issued July 21, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00580-CR

———————————

IN RE CLAIR A. WOLF, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Clair A. Wolf, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to 

compel the trial court “to set, hear and rule on a properly filed motion.”1

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5 

(requiring all documents filed with court to contain proof of service on all parties), 

 

1

The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Clair A. Wolf, cause number 1354683, 

in the 248th District Court of Harris County, Texas.
2

52.3 (establishing requirements for contents of petition for writ of mandamus), 

52.7 (requiring that petition for writ of mandamus be accompanied by record).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Massengale.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with the accompanying Annual Report of TS Electronics, Inc.
(formerly  named  Softstone  Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year  ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Keith Boyd, Chief Executive Officer
of  the  Company,  hereby  certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                   /s/  Keith  Boyd
Dated:  October  10,  2003         ---------------------------------------------
                                   Keith  Boyd
                                   Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-K  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.










                                                                      Exhibit 32
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page