alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1



I, Daniel Keesman, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of LION bioscience Aktiengesellschaft;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred subsequent to the
date of our most recent evaluation that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting.



5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the companys internal controls over financial reporting.



Date: April 20, 2004



|       |  |                                                       
|------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/    Dr. Daniel Keesman                             
|Name:  |  | Dr. Daniel Keesman                                    
|Title: |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5153 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the Native American 

veteran housing loan pilot program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 

Ms. HERSETH (for herself, Mr. EVANS, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. UDALL of New 

Mexico, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, and Mr. ABERCROMBIE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the Native 

American veteran housing loan pilot program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Native American Vet5 erans Home Loan Act of 2004’’. 
2 

•HR 5153 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF NATIVE AMERICAN VETERAN HOUS2 ING LOAN PILOT PROGRAM. 

3 Section 3761(c) of title 38, United States Code, is 

4 amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2005’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘December 31, 2010’’. 

Æ
Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB   Document 129   Filed 11/02/11   Page 1 of 1 PageID: 4193
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of JPG Associates, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Greeley, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ John P. Greeley John P. Greeley Title: President and Chief Financial Officer   May 16 2007
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Krista Lynne Gardner, Independent Executrix of the Estate of Larry Ray Tiner, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00062

- CV v.
Penny Heddin Tiner, Appellee Appeal from the 402nd Judicial District Court of Wood County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2006

- 404 ). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgme nt of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We further order that the appellant, Krista Lynne Gardner, Independent Executrix of the Estate of Larry Ray Tiner, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED MARCH 17, 2015 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: D ebra K. Autrey, Clerk
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0106. WILLIAM J. HENDERSON v. THE STATE.

In 2000, William J. Henderson pled guilty to murder and other charges. The

Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s denial of his motion for out-of-time appeal. 

Henderson v. State, 293 Ga. 6 (743 SE2d 19) (2013). Henderson later filed a motion

in arrest of judgment, which the trial court denied. He sought discretionary review

of that ruling in this Court, but we transferred the application to the Supreme Court. 

See Case No. A16D0069 (transferred September 22, 2016). Henderson has now filed

a “Petition for Writ of Certiorari” in this Court, which we have docketed as a second

application for discretionary appeal and in which he again seeks review of the trial

court’s denial of his motion in arrest of judgment. 

Under our Constitution, the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction over

“[a]ll cases in which a sentence of death was imposed or could be imposed.” Ga.

Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (8). Because a penalty of death can be

imposed for the crime of murder, jurisdiction is proper in the Supreme Court. See

OCGA § 17-10-30 (b); Neal v. State, 290 Ga. 563, 572 (722 SE2d 765) (2012)

(Hunstein, C. J., concurring); see also State v. Thornton, 253 Ga. 524 (1) (322 SE2d

711) (1984) (directing this Court to transfer “all cases in which either a sentence of

death or of life imprisonment has been imposed upon conviction of murder”).

Accordingly, this application is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for

disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

10/14/2016

October 14, 2016
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joyce Copeland, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 755]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Ward, J., at plea; Robert Stolz, J., at sentence), rendered on or about May 21, 2004, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur—Tom, J.E, Saxe, Friedman, Sullivan and McGuire, JJ.
Case 2:11-cr-00117-SDW Document 13 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 24
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5122 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2004 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to 

permit members of the Board of Directors of the Office 

of Compliance to serve for 2 terms. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 5122 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. PERMITTING SECOND TERM FOR BOARD OF DI2 RECTORS OF OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The second sentence of section 

4 301(e)(1) of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 

5 (2 U.S.C. 1381(e)(1)) is amended to read as follows: ‘‘A

6 member of the Board may be reappointed, but no indi7 vidual may serve as a member for more than 2 terms.’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE .—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to individuals serv10 ing on the Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance 

11 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
Case 2:11-cv-02479-JLL-MAH   Document 72-2   Filed 12/15/11   Page 1 of 8 PageID: 3064

Case 2:11-cv-02479-JLL-MAH   Document 72-2   Filed 12/15/11   Page 2 of 8 PageID: 3065

Case 2:11-cv-02479-JLL-MAH   Document 72-2   Filed 12/15/11   Page 3 of 8 PageID: 3066

Case 2:11-cv-02479-JLL-MAH   Document 72-2   Filed 12/15/11   Page 4 of 8 PageID: 3067

Case 2:11-cv-02479-JLL-MAH   Document 72-2   Filed 12/15/11   Page 5 of 8 PageID: 3068

Case 2:11-cv-02479-JLL-MAH   Document 72-2   Filed 12/15/11   Page 6 of 8 PageID: 3069

Case 2:11-cv-02479-JLL-MAH   Document 72-2   Filed 12/15/11   Page 7 of 8 PageID: 3070

Case 2:11-cv-02479-JLL-MAH   Document 72-2   Filed 12/15/11   Page 8 of 8 PageID: 3071
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 12-3828

_____________

PATRICIA THOMPSON,

Appellant

v.

REAL ESTATE MORTGAGE NETWORK; 

SECURITY ATLANTIC MORTGAGE COMPANY;

NOEL CHAPMAN, an individual; SAMUEL LAMPARELLO, an individual

_____________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(D.C. Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01494)

District Judge: Honorable Dennis M. Cavanaugh

_____________

Argued November 6, 2013

Before: GREENAWAY, JR., VANASKIE and ROTH, Circuit Judges

___________ 

JUDGMENT

___________

This cause came on to be considered on the record from the United States District 

Court for the District of New Jersey and was argued on November 6, 2013. On 

consideration whereof, it is now hereby

ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this Court that the Order of the District Court 

entered August 31, 2012 is hereby vacated and remanded. Costs shall be taxed against 

Appellees in this matter. All of the above in accordance with the Opinion of this Court.

Case 2:11-cv-01494-DMC-JAD Document 43 Filed 04/03/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 302
2

ATTEST:

s/Marcia M. Waldron

Clerk

Dated: April 3, 2014

Case 2:11-cv-01494-DMC-JAD Document 43 Filed 04/03/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 303
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 95-30531

____________________

HERBERT J. AUCOIN; PENNY ST. GERMAIN AUCOIN, Wife,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

and

AMER PLANT SERVICES, INC., and
LANDMARK INSURANCE COMPANY;

Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

CNI GIRDLER INC., a/k/a Bartlett-Snow, Inc.; SKF BEARINGS, INC.; BARTLETT-SNOW, A Division of Combustion Engineering, Inc.; MIETHER BEARING PRODUCTS, INC., A Division of Alco Industries, Inc., successor in interest to Miether Machine Works, inc; KENNEDY VAN SAUN CORP., A subsidiary of McNally Pittsburg SEQUOIA VENTURES, INC., Successor in interest to C&I Girdler, Inc.,

Defendants,

and

SVEDALA INDUSTRIES, INC., incorrectly named as Kennedy Van Saun Corp.,

Defendant-Appellee.

_______________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Louisiana

(CA-93-2565-N)

_______________________________________________________________
February 14, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

1 The plaintiffs initially contend that the characterization of a transaction as a contract of sale or a construction contract is necessarily an issue of fact for which summary judgment is improper. This argument is without merit. S ee, e.g. , Smith v. Arcadian Corp. , 657 So.2d 464 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1995).

2 We also affirm the district court's denial of the plaintiffs' motion for new trial, properly construed by the district court as

a third motion for reconsideration, on the basis that it raised an entirely new theory of liability. PER CURIAM: *

The central issue in this diversity case is whether the

contract between Sveldala Industries, Inc., and Sequoia Ventures,

Inc., for a granulator constitutes a contract of sale or a

construction contract under Louisiana law. 1 The district court

determined that it was a construction contract and thus applied the

ten-year peremptive period provid ed by section 9:2772 of the

Louisiana Revised Statutes to bar the claims of the plaintiffs.

Having reviewed the thoughtful opinion of the district court, the

briefs of the parties, and the record, we fin d no error in the

analysis of the district court, and therefore AFFIRM. 2

A F F I R M E D.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

---------------------------------------------------------------X

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Crim. No.: 11cr165 (KSH)

: ORDER AMENDING

JUDGMENT IN A

-against- : CRIMINAL CASE AS TO 

SURRENDER DATE 

ONLY

:

PASQUALE ZINNA,

a/k/a “PATTY ZINNA,” and “ :

PATRICK ZINNA,” et. al.

:

---------------------------------------------------------------X

WHEREAS the defendant, Pasquale Zinna, has made application for an 

earlier surrender date, the U.S. Attorney’s office has no objection to this application, and 

good cause appears to grant the application;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Judgment signed June 6, 2012 and 

entered June 8, 2012 as Doc #101 is hereby amended and the defendant shall surrender 

for service of sentence at the institution previously designated by the Bureau of Prisons, 

Fort Dix SCP, Fort Dix, New Jersey before 12 noon on July 15, 2012. 

SO ORDERED:

/s/ Katharine S. Hayden

______________________________

KATHARINE S. HAYDEN, U.S.D.J.

Dated: June 29, 2012
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00074

- CR

Javier Salazar v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 197th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021

- DCR

- 0793

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered th is cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RE NDERS judgment in
accordance wit h its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
M arch 23, 2023
Case 2:11-cr-00076-KSH Document 14 Filed 07/20/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 35
Case 2:11-cr-00076-KSH Document 14 Filed 07/20/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 36
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
RULES 13A-15(E) AND 15D-15(E) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lotus Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report.3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
represented in this report.4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
    /s/ Richard E. BauerRichard E. BauerChief Financial Officer
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1384 

KA 10-01085 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

JOHNNY CANNON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PIOTR BANASIAK OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County

(John J. Brunetti, A.J.), rendered May 3, 2010. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession

of a weapon in the second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Entered: December 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
|Exhibit 32
|----------

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT



|Dann H. Bowman and Sandra F. Pender hereby certify as follows:1.  They are the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, ofChino Commercial Bancorp.2.  The Form 10-Q of Chino Commercial Bancorp for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009complies with the requirements pf Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78(m)or 78(d)) and the information contained in the report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Chino Commercial Bancorp.Date: May 12, 2009
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | By:/s/ Dann H. BowmanDann H. BowmanPresident and Chief Executive OfficerBy:/s/ Sandra F. PenderSandra F. PenderSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         Neurological Sciences Training Initial Review Group; NST-1 Subcommittee.                     

*Date:*                         January 26-27, 2009.                     

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Renaissance Mayflower Hotel, 1127 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20036.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Raul A. Saavedra, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch,  Division of Extramural Research,  NINDS/NIH/DHHS,  NSC; 6001 Executive Blvd., Ste. 3208, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529,  301-496-9223,                         *saavedrr@ninds.nih.gov*.                     

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle. 

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological  Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 16, 2009. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

 [FR Doc. E9-1664 Filed 1-26-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P