alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

                   SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF MICHAEL KELLEHER


                        CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT

      In connection with the Annual Report of Quantum Companies, Inc.
 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael Kelleher, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
 that:

         (1.) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: March 25, 2005               By: /s/ Michael Kelleher
                                          -----------------
                                            Michael Kelleher
                                               President
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
 Date: November 16, 2009
    By:
    /s/ David R. AllenDavid R. AllenChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 23.3****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-113054 and333-143029 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 11, 2008 relating to the financial statementsof Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (which audit report expresses an unqualified opinion on the financialstatements and includes a separate report titled Comments by Independent Registered CharteredAccountants on Canada — United States of America Reporting Differences referring to conditions andevents that cast substantial doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern andchanges in accounting principles that have a material effect on the comparability of the Company’sfinancial statements) and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearingin this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.(signed) “Deloitte & Touche LLP”Independent Registered Chartered Accountants
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 32644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16149]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ID-957-1420-BJ]


Idaho: Filing of Plats of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of filing of plats of surveys.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has officially filed the 
plats of survey of the lands described below in the BLM Idaho State 
Office, Boise, Idaho, effective 9 a.m., on the dates specified.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 1387 South 
Vinnell Way, Boise, Idaho 83709-1657.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These surveys were executed at the request 
of the Bureau of Land Management to meet their administrative needs. 
The lands surveyed are:
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
subdivisional lines and the subdivision of sections 4, 9, 10, 11, and 
12 in T. 11 N., R. 16 E., Boise Meridian, Idaho, Group Number 1264, was 
accepted April 28, 2009.
    The field notes representing the perpetuation of Angle Point Number 
1, in section 27 in T. 9 S., R. 20 E., Boise Meridian, Idaho, Group 
Number 1000, were accepted May 7, 2009.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of portions of the 
south boundary, subdivisional lines, and subdivision of section lines, 
and the subdivision of sections 26, 29, 32, 33, and 34, and the metes-
and-bounds survey of lot 2 in section 20, T. 7 S., R. 35 E., Boise 
Meridian, Idaho, Group Number 1148, was accepted May 7, 2009.
    The supplemental plat of section 20, lots 1 and 2, T. 7 S., R. 35 
E., Boise Meridian, Idaho, was prepared to amend certain erroneous 
acreages as depicted on the plat accepted May 7, 2009.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
south boundary and a portion of the subdivisional lines, and 
subdivision of sections 27 and 34, T. 14 S., R. 22 E., Boise Meridian, 
Idaho, Group Number 1276, was accepted June 25, 2009.

    Dated: July 2, 2009.
Stanley G. French,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho.
[FR Doc. E9-16149 Filed 7-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
Exhibit 32.1

              Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                      of Title 18 of the United States Code

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of NTR Acquisition Co. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Mario E. Rodriguez,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ MARIO E. RODRIGUEZ
-----------------------------------
Mario E. Rodriguez
Chief Executive Officer
May 18, 2007

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to NTR Acquisition Co. and will be
retained by NTR Acquisition Co. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5105 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5105

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 30, 2004

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to 
    carry out construction and related activities in support of the 
 collaborative Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System 
          (VERITAS) project on Kitt Peak near Tucson, Arizona.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING BOARD OF REGENTS OF SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION TO 
              CARRY OUT CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED ACTIVITIES IN SUPPORT 
              OF VERITAS ASTROPHYSICAL OBSERVATORY PROJECT.

    The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution is authorized 
to carry out construction and related activities in support of the 
collaborative Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System 
(VERITAS) project on Kitt Peak near Tucson, Arizona.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 for fiscal year 
2005 to carry out section 1.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 29, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### BRUNNER v. ROP-LOC PRODUCTS CO. et al.

Civ. No. 26143.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

April 28, 1949.

Vern L. Oldham, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Milton Alfred Roemisch, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants.

JONES, Chief Judge.

This is an action for alleged patent infringement.

From the affidavits and pleadings and briefs submitted by the parties it appears that the complaint was filed on January 12, 1949; that on January 26th plaintiff’s counsel received a copy of a joint answer and cross petition by defendants and on the same day a copy was presented to the Clerk’s office of this court for filing; that the copy presented to the Clerk did.not contain a certification of service or mailing to plaintiff and was, for that reason, returned to the counsel for defendant by the Clerk; that on February 8th another joint answer and cross petition which contained the necessary certification was presented to the Clerk and was filed. Meanwhile, it appears that the plaintiff unaware that the first joint answer and cross petition had been rejected by the Clerk for filing, had, on February 7th, filed a reply to said cross petition; that the joint answer and cross petition filed on February 8th contained a further defense which had not been set forth in the first joint answer which had been sent to plaintiff but had not been filed.

Under this state of facts, the plaintiff has filed a motion to strike the additional defense on the grounds that it was not timely filed and that the joint answer and cross petition could not be amended as a matter of course under Rule 15, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., since a responsive pleading, i. e., plaintiff’s reply, had already been served.

*209Defendants have filed a motion for leave to amend their first (unfiled) joint answer to read as the one which was filed on February 8th. Plaintiff opposes the motion on the ground that since a responsive pleading (the reply) has been filed, an amendment of the pleading to which the responsive pleading was made cannot be filed as a matter of right under Rule 15.

Plaintiff’s reply was responsive to defendants’ cross petition but was not responsive to the joint answer. It is the joint answer, not the cross petition, which defendants wish to amend. The fact that defendants saw fit to file a cross petition along with their answer should not operate to deprive defendants of an otherwise available right to amend their answer. Plaintiff will not be required to amend his reply to the cross petition because of a change in the joint answer. The plaintiff will in no way be prejudiced because of the proposed amendment.

In the interests of justice and in order to straighten out the pleadings, the defendants’ motion for leave to amend their joint answer will be granted and plaintiff’s motion to strike will be overruled.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6414

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHARLES ANTOINE BURGESS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (8:13-cr-00361-GRA-1)

Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: July 27, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Antoine Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B. Cauthen, 

II, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Antoine Burgess appeals from the district court order 

denying, without prejudice, his motion to be transferred to a 

federal correctional facility. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. United States v. Burgess, No. 8:13-

cr-00361-GRA-1 (D.S.C. Feb. 5, 2015). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-05-00020- CV The HON Co m pany , asubs idia r y o f HON Indus tr ie s In c ., App e lla nt v. Mayfield Paper C om pany, Ap pellee
F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY , 51ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. A-04- 0117 -C, H ONO RAB LE BEN WO ODW ARD, JUDGE P RESIDING

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N The pa rties have filed a joint motion to di smiss this appea l advising that they have e nte re d into a

se ttl e me nt a g re e me nt. Th e a pp e a l is dis mis se d a

nd c os ts a re a sse sse d a g a ins t th e pa

rt y inc ur ri ngthe m.

__________________________________________ Be a Ann Smith, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces B . A. Smith and Pemberton Dismissed on J oint Moti on Filed: May

12, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

____________________________________

:

RONALD MAZZUCCO :

: Civil Action No.: 11-2430 (ES)

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL, INC., et al., : ORDER

:

Defendants. :

____________________________________:

This matter comes before the Court by way of Plaintiff’s objection to Magistrate Judge

Waldor’s Report and Recommendation dated November 23, 2011. For the reasons set forth in the

corresponding Opinion, 

IT IS on this 30th day of December, 2011, hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s objection to the Report and Recommendation is overruled; and

it is further 

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is adopted in full; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall therefore terminate Plaintiff’s motion to remand

(Docket Entry No. 7), as well as the Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 22). 

s/Esther Salas 

Esther Salas, U.S.D.J.

Case 2:11-cv-02430-ES-CLW Document 26 Filed 12/30/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 537
EXHIBIT 23.1

BAGELL, JOSEPHS
& COMPANY, L.L.C.
Certified Public Accountants


                                                     High Ridge Commons
                                                     Suites 400-403
                                                     200 Haddonfield Berlin Road
                                                     Gibbsboro, New Jersey 08026
                                                     P: 856-346-2828
                                                     F: 856-346-2882

May 9, 2005

The Board of Directors
SiteWorks, Building & Development Co.,
6464 N W 5th Wat, Ft. Lauderdale Fl.


Ref:     Consent to use of financial statements

         We consent to the use of our consolidated financial statements dated
December 31, 2005 with respect to SiteWorksBuilding & Development Co.,. and
subsidiary for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, included herein on
annual reports and reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the
company's prospectus.



/s/ Bagell Josephs & Company LLC
--------------------------------
Gibbsboro, New Jersey
May 9, 2006
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5097 

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to prevent conflicts of interest 

by establishing post-employment limitations on bank examiners-in-charge, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2004 

Mr. GUTIERREZ (for himself and Mrs. KELLY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to prevent 

conflicts of interest by establishing post-employment limitations on bank examiners-in-charge, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Close the Bank Exam5 iner Revolving Door Act ’’. 
2 

•HR 5097 IH 

1 SEC. 2. POST-EMPLOYMENT LIMITATIONS ON BANK EXAM2 INERS-IN-CHARGE. 

3 Section 10 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 

4 U.S.C. 1821) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(g) POST-EMPLOYMENT LIMITATIONS ON BANK

7 EXAMINERS-IN-CHARGE.— 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any person 

9 who— 

10 ‘‘(A) ceases to be an officer or employee of 

11 a Federal banking agency; and 

12 ‘‘(B) at any time during the 3-year period 

13 ending on the date such person ceases to be an 

14 officer or employee of such agency, was the 

15 chief examiner of, or had supervisory authority 

16 over, any depository institution, 

17 such person may not hold any office, position, or 

18 employment (including a position which causes such 

19 person to be treated as an institution-affiliated 

20 party) at any such depository institution during the 

21 1-year period beginning on such date. 

22 ‘‘(2) PENALTY FOR NONCOMPLIANCE.— 

23 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Any person who vio24 lates paragraph (1) shall forfeit such person’s 

25 retirement and other benefits under title 5, 

26 United States Code. 
3 

•HR 5097 IH 

1 ‘‘(B) NOTICE.—If the head of any Federal 

2 banking agency determines that a violation of 

3 paragraph (1) has occurred, the head of such 

4 agency shall notify the Director of the Office of 

5 Personnel Management of such violation.’’. 

Æ
Exhibit 23**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-116234 ofThe Topps Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form S-8 of our reports dated May 9, 2006, relating tothe consolidated financial statements and consolidated financialstatement schedule of the Company (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes anexplanatory paragraph relating to the restatement described in Note2),and to management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingappearing in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for thefiscal year ended February 25, 2006.DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPNew York, New York
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

      ( print page 33269)    

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of Amspec Services LLC, as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, Amspec Services LLC, 360 East Elizabeth Ave., Linden, NJ 07036, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​.*

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of Amspec Services LLC, as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on March 18, 2009. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for March 2012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anthony Malana, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: July 2, 2009.

Ira S. Reese,

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. E9-16361 Filed 7-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
PacifiCorp 12.31.12 EX 10.11






EXHIBIT 10.11




AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO THE
PACIFICORP
EXECUTIVE VOLUNTARY DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN




This Amendment No. 2 to the PacifiCorp Executive Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan (“Plan”) shall be effective as of January 1, 2013.


The purpose of this Amendment is to provide that members of the Advisory Boards (as defined in Section 1.18 the Plan prior to the adoption of this Amendment) are no longer eligible to participate in the Plan (no individual has participated in the past as an Advisory Board member).


		
	1.
	Section 1.07, definition of “Compensation”,  is hereby amended by substituting the following in place thereof:




“1.07  'Compensation' means Base Salary, performance awards and annual incentive bonuses (other than Employer long term incentive awards).  Inclusion of any other forms of compensation is subject to approval by the Employer.”  


		
	2.
	Section 1.18, definition of “Participant”, is hereby amended by substituting the following in place thereof:




“1.18  'Participant' means an Employee of the Employer who has met the eligibility requirements of Section 2.01 and who has accrued a benefit under the Plan.”


		
	3.
	Section 2.01, entitled “Participant Designated”, is hereby amended by substituting the following in place thereof:




“2.01  Participant Designated.  The Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Employer shall designate and approve the Employees who are eligible to participate in the Plan, such designation to be either by name, job title or other classification.  The Chairman may also notify any Participant that he or she is no longer eligible to make future deferrals into the Plan.  Such termination of eligibility shall be effective for Compensation earned after December 31 following such written notification to the individual.  However, until final distribution has been made to such person from his or her Accounts, for all other purposes under the Plan, the person shall still be considered a Participant.”















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PacifiCorp has caused this instrument to be signed by its duly authorized officer on this 16th day of October, 2012.


                    
                	
		
	PACIFICORP

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Gregory E. Abel

	 
	Gregory E. Abel

	 
	Chairman