alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



                                   CONSENT OF
                            ALLAN SPIVAK ENGINEERING


As independent oil and gas consultants, Allan Spivak Engineering hereby consents
to the use of our reserve report dated as of March, 2003, and all references to
our firm included in or made a part of the Ivanhoe Energy Inc. Annual Report on
Form 10-K to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about
March 17, 2003.



                                            Yours truly,

                                            ALLAN SPIVAK ENGINEERING


                                            "Allan Spivak"
                                            ------------------------------------
                                             Allan Spivak, President

                                             March 1, 2003
Case 2:11-cr-00405-KSH Document 12 Filed 01/13/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 27
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2

- 10

- 152

- CR

NO. 2

- 10

- 153

- CR

RUSSELL SMITH APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 16TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

Appellant Russell Smith filed a pro se notice of appeal from the March 23

,

2010 judgment s convicti ng him of assault

– family violence and tampering with a

witness. On April 27, 2010, we notified Smith that the trial court’s certification s of

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

his right to appeal had been filed under the date of April 27, 2010; 2 that the

certification s state these are plea bargain case s and he has no right of appeal;

and that the appeal s may be dismissed unless he or any party desir ing to

continue the appeal s files a response showing grounds for continuing the

appeal s with the court on or before May 7, 2010. We have not received a

response. Therefore, in accordance with the trial court’s certification s , we

dismiss the appeal s

. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J

. ; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 5 , 2010

2 See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4623

_____________________________
L ILLIAN T HURMAN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Jackson County

. Christopher N. Patterson , Judge

. September 13, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R AY , C.J., and B.L. T HOMAS and R OWE , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahasse e , for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v. :Crim. No. 11-341 (SDW)

LAWRENCE J. BROWN ‘CONTINUANCE ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of Paul J. Fishman, United
States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (by Mala Ahuja Harker, Assistant U.S. Attorney),
and defendant Lawrence J. Brown (by Patrick McMahon, Esq.) for an order granting a continuance
of the proceedings in the above-captioned matter for a period of 45 days to allow the parties to
conduct plea negotiations and attempt to finalize a plea agreement, and one continuance having
previously been granted by the Court pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section
3161(h)(7)(A), so that the parties could attempt to resolve the matter and thereby avoid a possible
trial, and the defendant being aware that he has the right to have the matter tried within seventy
days of the date of his arraignment pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(b), and
the defendant having consented to the continuance and waived such right, and for good cause
shown,

It IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should be continued for the
following reasons:

(1) Plea negotiations are currently in progress, and both the United States and

the defendant desire additional time to negotiate a plea agreement, which would render a trial of

this matter unnecessary;


Gee fl

(2) Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7), the ends of justice

served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a
speedy trial.

IT IS, therefore, on this os of October, 2011,

ORDERED that this action be, and it hereby is, continued for a period of 45 days
from October 7, 2011 through and including November 20, 2011; and it is further

ORDERED that the period from October 7, 2011 thro ‘ and including November

Form and entry
consented to:

Mala Ahuja Harkey”
Assistant U.S. Attorney

FS Decl

Patrick McMahon, Esq.
Counsel for defendant Lawrence J. ¥ own
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 49

To permanently extend the moratorium enacted by the Internet Tax Freedom 

Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Mr. COX (for himself, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. CANNON, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. 

CUNNINGHAM, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. DREIER, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. 

GOODLATTE, Mr. HERGER, Mr. HYDE, Mr. ISSA, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. 

GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. OSE, Mr. PENCE, Mr. PLATTS, Mr. 

POMBO, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. DOOLITTLE, 

Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Mr. SWEENEY, 

Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. 

BLUMENAUER, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. DICKS, Mr. 

LEWIS of California, and Mr. BEAUPREZ) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To permanently extend the moratorium enacted by the 

Internet Tax Freedom Act, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Internet Tax Non5 discrimination Act’’. 
2

•HR 49 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF INTERNET TAX FREE2 DOM ACT MORATORIUM. 

3 (a) PERMANENT EXTENSION; INTERNET ACCESS

4 TAXES.—Section 1101 of the Internet Tax Freedom Act 

5 (47 U.S.C. 151 note) is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘taxes during the period begin7 ning on October 1, 1998, and ending on November 

8 1, 2003—’’ and inserting ‘‘taxes after September 

9 30, 1998:’’; 

10 (2) by striking paragraph (1) of subsection (a) 

11 and inserting the following: 

12 ‘‘(1) Taxes on Internet access.’’, 

13 (3) by striking ‘‘multiple’’ in paragraph (2) of 

14 subsection (a) and inserting ‘‘Multiple’’; 

15 (4) by striking subsection (d); and 

16 (5) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as 

17 subsections (d) and (e), respectively. 

18 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1104(10) 

19 of the Internet Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) 

20 is amended by striking ‘‘unless’’ and all that follows 

21 through ‘‘1998’’.

Æ
EX-10.6



 Exhibit 10.6 
 ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Assignment Agreement (“Assignment”), entered
into by and among Northwest Pipeline Services LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignor”), and Williams WPC-I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”), is effective as of January 1, 2013 (the
“Effective Date”). 
 RECITALS 
 A. WHEREAS, Northwest Pipeline GP, a Delaware general partnership, and Assignor are parties to an Administrative Services Agreement dated October 1, 2007 (the “Agreement”). 

B. WHEREAS, pursuant to an organizational restructuring of The Williams Companies, Inc. and its affiliates, employees of Assignor ceased
to be employees of Assignor and became employees solely of Assignee on the Effective Date. 
 Assignor and Assignee hereto agree as follows:

 ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION 
 1. Assignment. Assignor hereby assigns to Assignee all rights, obligations, and other interests in and under the Agreement. 
 2. Assumption. Assignee shall assume and be responsible for all of Assignor’s rights, obligations, and other interests in and under the Agreement, including, but not limited to, any rights or
obligations arising before the Effective Date. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Assignment to be
executed by their duly authorized representatives on February 13, 2013. 
  

									
	 ASSIGNOR:
	 		 	ASSIGNEE:
			
	 Northwest Pipeline Services LLC
	 		 	 Williams WPC-I, LLC

					
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Allison G. Bridges
	 		 	 By:
	 	/s/ Stephanie C. Cipolla
		 	 Allison G. Bridges

Vice President
	 		 		 	 Stephanie C. Cipolla

President
Case 2:11-cv-02312-SDW-MCA Document 32 Filed 02/10/11 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 267
Case 2:11-cv-02312-SDW-MCA Document 32 Filed 02/10/11 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 268
Case 2:11-cv-02312-SDW-MCA Document 32 Filed 02/10/11 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 269
Case 2:11-cv-02312-SDW-MCA Document 32 Filed 02/10/11 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 270
IC 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 134 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 29, 2019 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend title 18, United States Code, with regard to 

stalking. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

S 134 RFH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Combat Online Preda3 tors Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ENHANCED PENALTY FOR STALKERS OF CHILDREN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 110A of title 18, United 

6 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2261A 

7 the following: 

8 ‘‘§ 2261B. Enhanced penalty for stalkers of children 

9 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection 

10 (b), if the victim of an offense under section 2261A is 

11 under the age of 18 years, the maximum imprisonment 

12 for the offense is 5 years greater than the maximum term 

13 of imprisonment otherwise provided for that offense in sec14 tion 2261. 

15 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to 

16 a person who violates section 2261A if— 

17 ‘‘(1) the person is subject to a sentence under 

18 section 2261(b)(5); and 

19 ‘‘(2)(A) the person is under the age of 18 at 

20 the time the offense occurred; or 

21 ‘‘(B) the victim of the offense is not less than 

22 15 nor more than 17 years of age and not more 

23 than 3 years younger than the person who com24 mitted the offense at the time the offense oc25 curred.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

S 134 RFH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 at the beginning of chapter 110A of title 18, United States 

3 Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to 

4 section 2261A the following new item: 

‘‘2261B. Enhanced penalty for stalkers of children.’’. 

5 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2261A of 

6 title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘sec7 tion 2261(b) of this title’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2261(b) 

8 or section 2261B, as the case may be’’. 

9 SEC. 3. REPORT ON BEST PRACTICES REGARDING EN10 FORCEMENT OF ANTI-STALKING LAWS. 

11 Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 

12 of this Act, the Attorney General shall submit a report 

13 to Congress, which shall— 

14 (1) include an evaluation of Federal, Tribal, 

15 State, and local efforts to enforce laws relating to 

16 stalking; and 

17 (2) identify and describe those elements of such 

18 efforts that constitute the best practices for the en19 forcement of such laws. 

Passed the Senate October 28, 2019. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000

Commission File Number: 333-85443-03

ABN AMRO Mortgage Corporation issuer in respect of
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2000-1
(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware      			363886007
(State or Other Juris-		(I.R.S. Employer
diction of Incorporation)     Identification No.)

181 West Madison Street, Chicago, IL 60602
(Address of Principal Executive Office)

248-643-2530
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:     None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:     None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed  by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  X   No _

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.

Not applicable.

Aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of
the Registrant as of December 31, 2000.

Not applicable.

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31,
2000.

Not applicable.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5147

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostAshcraft Post Office Building’’. West Hills, California, as the ‘‘Evan Asa al Service located at 23055 Sherman Way in

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5147

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 23055 Sherman Way in West Hills, California,

as the ‘‘Evan Asa Ashcraft Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5147 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 23055 Sherman Way in West Hills, California,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Evan Asa Ashcraft

5 Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Evan Asa Ashcraft Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 28,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                        ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                             DENARII RESOURCES INC.
            FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2008
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Chris Lori, am the Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer
of Denarii Resources Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering
this  certificate  in connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company  for the three  month  period  ended  March 31,  2008 and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information
contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 24, 2008
                                         By: /s/ Chris Lori
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             CHRIS LORI
                                             Chief Executive Officer, President,
                                             acting Chief Financial Officer,
                                             acting Principal Accounting Officer
                                             and Director
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-44114) pertaining to the 1997
Stock Plan, 1998 Stock Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-102922, No. 333-84620,
No. 333-58680) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the related prospectus of SeeBeyond Technology Corporation (formerly Software
Technologies Corporation) of our report dated January 27, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, as amended, and financial statement schedule of SeeBeyond Technology
Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission

Woodland
Hills, California
March 9, 2004

---

QuickLinks
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NOS. WR-79,487-01 AND WR-79,487-02

EX P ARTE ERMINIO ARROYOS, JR., Appli cant
ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. W11627-1 AND W11713-1 IN THE 355TH DIST RICT COURT F ROM HOOD COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a firea rm by a felon and possession of a controlled s ubstance , and sentenc ed to ninety-nine year s’ imprisonment. The Second Court of Appea ls aff irmed his convictions. Arroyos v. State , Nos. 02- 1100135-CR and 02-11-00136- CR (Tex. App. – Fort Worth, May 3, 2012). Applicant contends that h is a pp e ll a te c o u n s e l re n d ere d ineffe ctive assistance beca use counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been aff irmed. We reman ded this application to the trial c ourt for f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law
.2

Appellate counsel filed an aff idavit with the trial court. In addition, the trial court obtained
an aff idavit from the custodian of rec ords of the prison mail room on the unit wher e Applicant was imprisoned during the applicable time period. Ba sed on those aff idavits, the trial court has enter ed finding s of fac t and conclusions of law rec ommending that relief be grante d. Ex parte W ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionar

y revie w of the judgme nts of the S ec o n d C o urt of Appea ls in Cause Nos. 02-11- 0 0 1 3 5 -C R and 02-11-00136- CR that aff irmed his convictions in Cause Nos. W11627-1 an d W 1 1 7 1 3 -1 fr o m the 355th District Court of Hood County
. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionar

y revie w with this Court within 30 day s of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Deliver ed: September

11, 2013 Do not publish
Exhibit 12.2

CFO SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Francisco H. Suarez, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of PSi Technologies Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The companys other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of
companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys
internal control over financial reporting.

July 16, 2007



|       |  |                                
|------ |  | -------------------------------
|By:    |  | /S/    FRANCISCO H. SUAREZ,
JR.
|Name:  |  | Francisco H. Suarez, Jr.       
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 1 of 20 PageID: 281
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 2 of 20 PageID: 282
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 3 of 20 PageID: 283
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 4 of 20 PageID: 284
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 5 of 20 PageID: 285
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 6 of 20 PageID: 286
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 7 of 20 PageID: 287
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 8 of 20 PageID: 288
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 9 of 20 PageID: 289
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 10 of 20 PageID: 290
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 11 of 20 PageID: 291
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 12 of 20 PageID: 292
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 13 of 20 PageID: 293
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 14 of 20 PageID: 294
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 15 of 20 PageID: 295
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 16 of 20 PageID: 296
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 17 of 20 PageID: 297
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 18 of 20 PageID: 298
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 19 of 20 PageID: 299
Case 3:11-cv-03153-MAS-TJB Document 8 Filed 11/08/12 Page 20 of 20 PageID: 300