alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Grace 6,
      Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ending November 30,
      2007 (the “Report”), I, Virginia K. Sourlis, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      to
      the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      January 9, 2008




By:
            /s/
                Virginia K. SourlisVirginia
                K. SourlisChief
                Executive Officer andChief
                Financial Officer ofGrace
                6, Inc.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 14, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40577

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PEDRO GRANDE-DORANTES,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(1:05-CR-1046-ALL)

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Pedro Grande-Dorantes appeals, on two bases, his sentence

following a guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry following

deportation. 

First, he contends the district court erred by enhancing his

sentence pursuant to advisory Guidelines § 2L1.2(b)(1)(B), based on

the court’s finding he was previously deported after a conviction

for a felony drug-trafficking offense. Grande-Dorantes contends
2

his prior Texas conviction for possession with intent to deliver

cocaine is not a drug-trafficking offense under § 2L1.2(b)(1)(B)

because Texas Health and Safety Code § 481.112(a) defines a

“delivery” to include an “offer to sell,” which is not punishable

under the Controlled Substances Act. 

Because Grande-Dorantes challenged this sentencing enhancement

in the district court, we review the district court’s application

of the advisory Guidelines de novo; its factual findings for clear

error. United States v. Villegas, 404 F.3d 355, 359 (5th Cir.

2005); United States v. Villanueva, 408 F.3d 193, 203 & n.9 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 268 (2005). 

At sentencing, the Government submitted state-court records

establishing that Grande-Dorantes stipulated to possessing cocaine

with the intent to distribute it. Because Grande-Dorantes

stipulated to conduct which constitutes a drug-trafficking offense

under § 2L1.2, the district court did not err in enhancing his

sentence. Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13, 16 (2005); United

States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 274 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,

126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). 

Grande-Dorantes also asserts that the felony and aggravated

felony provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional in the

light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and

subsequent Supreme Court decisions. This constitutional challenge

is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224,
3

235 (1998). Grande-Dorantes properly concedes this; he raises the

issue here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that two meetings of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts will be held at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20506 as follows (ending times are approximate):

*Literature (application review):*                     August 5-6, 2009 in Room 714. This meeting, from 9 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on August 5th and from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. on August 6th, will be closed.                

*Literature (application review):*                     August 7, 2009 in Room 714. This meeting, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., will be closed.                

The closed portions of meetings are for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of February 28, 2008, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.

Further information with reference to these meetings can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC, 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

Dated: July 13, 2009.

Kathy Plowitz-Worden,

Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.

[FR Doc. E9-16915 Filed 7-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
y 

)

as the representative of a class of similarly )

situated persons, )

Plaintiff, )

No.: l:11-cv-02658-JBS -KMW

V.

DAVID RANDALL ASSOCIATES, INC. )and RAYMOND MILEY III, )

Defendants. )

LPROPOSEDI ORDER ADMITTING DANIEL J. COHEN PRO HAC VICE

THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court on application of

Sherman, Silverstein, Kohl, Rose, and Podoisky, Alan C. Milstein appearing, New

Jersey counsel for Plaintiff City Select Auto Sales, Inc., for the admission pro hac

vice of Daniel J. Cohen, of the law firm Bock & Hatch, LLC, and for such good and

sufficient cause shown;

ITlSonthis Idayof ,2013;

ORDERED that Daniel J. Cohen. of the law flrm Bock & Hatch. LLC, be

permitted to appear pro hac vice in the ahovecaptioned matter pursuant to L. Giv.

1?, lOLlc provided, however, that all pleadings, briefs, and other papers filed with

the Court shall be signed by Alan C. Milstein of Sherman, Silverstein, Kohl, Rose,

and Podolskv which attorney shall be a member in good standing of the Bar of the

Supreme Court of New Jersey and the Bar of this court, who shall be held
p

y jurisdiction

of this Court: and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to New Jersey Court Rule 1:28-2(a), the

appropriate amount be promptly submitted by Daniel J. Cohen, or on his behalf, to

the New Jersey Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection, together with a copy of this

Order; and it is further

ORDERED that the United States District Court, District of New Jersey fee

for pro hac vice admission in the amount of $150.00 be paid within five (5) days of

receipt of this Order by Sherman, Silverstein, Kohl, Rose, and Podolsky and it is

further

ORDERED that Daniel J. Cohen continue to make the required annual

payments for any year in which the admitted attorney continues to represent a

client in a matter pending before this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Daniel J. Cohen shall be bound by the Local Givil Rules for

the District ofNew Jersey including, but not limited to, the provisions of L. Giv. R.

101. 1, Admission of Attorneys, L. Civ. R. 1 0-i. 1, Judicial Ethics and Professional

Re’..ponihi1itx md L (ii R 101 1 Discipline of \ttorne and it ifurther
—— —

KAREN M. \VILLIAMS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

3
Consumer Price Index, Bureau of Labor Statistics, February 2014 

Consumer Price Index: Changes in Seasonal Adjustment Status for 2014

These items are changing to Seasonally Adjusted:

Item code Title 

CUUR0000SERA05 

CWUR0000SERA05 

CUUR0000SEHP03 

CWUR0000SEHP03 

Audio equipment 

Moving, storage, freight expenses 

CUUR0000SETF03 

CWUR0000SETF03 

Parking and other fees 

CUUR0000SERE01 

CWUR0000SERE01 

Toys 

CUUR0000SS07021 

CUUR0000SS1804B 

CUUR0000SSFV031A 

Frozen fish and seafood 

Other condiments 

Food at elementary and secondary schools 

 
Consumer Price Index, Bureau of Labor Statistics, February 2014 

These items are changing to Not Seasonally Adjusted: 

Item code Title 

CUUR0000SAD 

CWUR0000SAD 

Durables
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER     
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,          
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Hassan Hans Badreddine, President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director of Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (a) | the Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the third quarter ended January 31, 2008, and to which this certification
      is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           

|By:    | /s/ Hassan Hans Badreddine                            | 
|------ | ----------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Hassan Hans Badreddine                                | 
|Title: | President, Chief Executive
      Officer and Director | 
|       | (Principal Executive Officer)                         | 
|Date:  | March 14, 2008                                        | 

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration
 AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (DOT).
 ACTION: Notice of national public workshop.
 SUMMARY: This FAA sponsored workshop will bring together individuals from FAA Headquarters, Certification Directorates, including the Aircraft Certification Offices, Industry and other Aviation Authorities including the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), and Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) for a collaborative discussion about TSO/European (E)TSO programs. The workshop will include presentations on: The Technical Standard Order (TSO) and European Technical Standard Order (ETSO) programs, which will include discussions on:
                    An overview of the data from the TSOA Holder evaluations;
                    Survey results on the TSO program;
                    Gaps in the TSO/ETSO programs;
                    Future Initiatives. Who should attend: Aviation Authorities who work with TSOs/ETSOs.
                    Industry participants who work with TSOs/ETSOs, including:
                    Avionics manufacturers;
                    TSO/ETSO installers (*i.e.*
                         Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) holders).
 DATES:  2009—Workshop Schedule
Tuesday
September 1
Aviation Authorities Only (FAA, EASA, TCCA) 8:30 a.m.-4 p.m.Wednesday
September 2
Open to all 8:30 a.m.-4 p.m.Thursday
September 3
Aviation Authorities Only (FAA, EASA, TCCA) 8:30 a.m.-4 p.m.
 ADDRESSES: The workshop will be held at the FAA Southern Regional Office, located at 1701 Columbia Ave., College Park, GA 30337. Workshop Information: Attendance at the conference will be limited to 350 participants. There is no charge for this workshop, however all participants must be registered in advance, no later than August 7, 2009. Agenda, Hotel, and Registration Information will be posted at: 
                        *http://www.faa.gov/​aircraft/​air_​cert/​design_​approvals/​tso/​.*
                         You may e-mail us at: 
                        *9-AWA-AVS-TSO-Workshop@faa.gov*
                         if you have questions.
 Issued in Washington, DC, July 9, 2009. Susan J. M. Cabler, Assistant Manager, Aircraft Engineering Division, Aircraft Certification Service.


[FR Doc. E9-16809 Filed 7-15-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7450

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee,
versus BARRY LEWIS MATTHEWS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (6:94-cr-70077-jct) Submitted: December 20, 2006 Decided: January 10, 2007 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barry Lewis Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Barry Lewis Matthews seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to correct sentence and modify judgment under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000). In criminal cases, the defendant must file his notice of appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); United States v. Alvarez , 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000) (holding that § 3582 proceeding is criminal in nature and ten-day appeal period applies, citing United States v. Petty , 82 F.3d 809, 810 (8th Cir. 1996), and United States v. Ono , 72 F.3d 101, 102-03 (9th Cir. 1995)). With or without a motion, the district court may grant an extension of time to file a notice of appeal of up to thirty days upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). The district court’s order was entered on its docket on July 14, 2006, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(6), and the ten-day appeal period expired on July 28, 2006. SeeFed. R. App. P. 26 (providing that “intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays” are excluded when the time period is less than eleven days). On August 4, 2006, the district court received a letter from Matthews in which he inquired as to the status of his § 3582 motion. Upon receipt of this letter, the district court mailed Matthews another*Although Matthews’ notice of appeal was stamped as filed by the district court on August 17, 2006, we deem it filed as of August 15, 2006, the date he gave it to prison officials for mailing. Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). - 3 - copy of its July 13 order. Matthews filed a notice of appeal on August 15, 2006, * within the thirty-day excusable neglect period. Because Matthews filed his notice of appeal within the excusable neglect period, we remand the case to the district court for the court to determine whether Matthews demonstrated excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the ten-day appeal period. The record as supplemented with the district court’s findings on remand will then be returned to this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. REMANDED
#### Evangeline Maria Boone et al., Plaintiffs, v City of New York, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Keyspan Energy Delivery N.Y.C., Sued Herein as Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 914]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hinds-Radix, J.), dated February 24, 2006, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint is granted.

The third-party defendant met its burden of establishing, prima facie, that it did not create the allegedly dangerous condition upon which the plaintiff Evangeline Maria Boone tripped and fell, and the third-party plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition *(see Cendales v City of New*York, 25 AD3d 579 [2006]; *Schwartz v City of New York,*23 AD3d 368 [2005]; *Verdes v Brooklyn Union Gas. Co.,*253 AD2d 552, 553 [1998]; *Curd v City of New York,*240 AD2d 460 [1997]).

Accordingly, the third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment should have been granted.

The third-party plaintiffs contentions regarding the best evidence rule and an affidavit of the third-party defendant’s employee are improperly raised for the first time on appeal, and, in any event, are without merit. Miller, J.E, Goldstein, Mastro and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.18.2

 

AMENDMENT TO JANUS 2010 LONG TERM STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

 

The Janus Capital Group Inc. 2010 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan, as amended (the “Plan”), is hereby amended as follows, effective April 26, 2012:

 

1.                                      The first sentence of Section 4.1 of the Plan hereby is amended by deleting it and replacing it with the following sentence:

 

Number of Shares Available for Grants.  Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.2, the number of Shares hereby reserved for issuance under the Plan shall be 13,400,000.

 

2.                                      The third sentence of Section 4.1 of the Plan hereby is amended by deleting it and replacing it with the following sentence:

 

The number of Shares for which Awards may be granted to any Grantee on any Grant Date, when aggregated with the number of Shares for which Awards have previously been granted to such Grantee in the same calendar year, shall not exceed one percent (1%) of the total Shares outstanding as of such Grant Date; provided, however, that the total number of Shares for which Awards may be granted to any Grantee in any calendar year shall not exceed 1,000,000.

 

3.                                      Except as amended above, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Janus Capital Group Inc. has executed this Amendment as of this 26th day of April, 2012.

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
Janus Capital Group Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Karlene J. Lacy
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
ATTEST:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Susan J. Armstrong
**EXHIBITNO. 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of NUICorporation (the "company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),I, John Kean, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)       thereport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2)       theinformation contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

/s/  John Kean, Jr.

John Kean, Jr.

President and

Chief Executive Officer

December 30, 2002
Exhibit 8

Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 600-10 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 43269

Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 600-10 Filed 06/25/18 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 43271 Case 2:11-cv-01754-JLL-JAD Document 529-14 Filed 05/21/18 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 34640

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this day I caused a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing documents to be served via ECF upon all counsel of record.

Dated: May 21, 2018 By: s/ Justin T. Quinn

Justin T. Quinn

Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 600-10 Filed 06/25/18 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 43273 Case 2:11-cv-01754-JLL-JAD Document 529-15 Filed 05/21/18 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 34642