alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U n ited S ta tes D istrict C ou rt

D istrict of N ew Jersey

LETTER-ORDER ORIGINAL FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURT

July 20, 2011

Charles R. Virginia, Esq.

Virginia & Ambinder, LLP

Trinity Centre

111 Broadway, 14th Floor

New York, NY 10006

Re: Trustees of the B.A.C., Local 4 Pension & Annuity Funds, et al

 v. Spezialetti Contracting, LLC

Civil Action: 11-2529 (JLL)

Dear Mr. Virginia:

You are hereby directed to move this civil action, by requesting that default

judgment be entered or submitting an extension to answer out of time, within fourteen 

(14) days from the date hereof. Should you fail to do so, this action shall be

listed for dismissal on Wednesday, August 3, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. 

SO ORDERED

 /s/ Jose L. Linares 

Jose L. Linares, U.S.D.J.

Case 2:11-cv-02529-JLL-MAH Document 6 Filed 07/20/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 20
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 135 (Thursday, July 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16914]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Allegheny National Forest, PA: Willow Creek All-Terrain Vehicle 
(ATV) Trail Expansion Project

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Withdrawal of a Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental 
Impact Statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Allegheny National Forest, Bradford Ranger District is 
issuing this notice to advise the public that the agency intends to 
withdraw their Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental 
Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed Willow Creek All-Terrain 
Vehicle (ATV) Trail Expansion Project (WCATEP).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NOI for this project was published on 
Friday, April 9, 2004, and can be found in the Federal Register Vol. 
69, No. 69, pages 18866-18867.
    Bradford District Ranger Anthony Scardina has recommended 
cancellation saying: It is important to focus on the maintenance and 
improvement of the recreation facilities and trails that we currently 
have on the District and Forest. This is the message that we continue 
to hear from our visitors and that is made apparent from our recent 
Recreation Facilities Analysis and other data analyses. Some of our 
existing motorized and non-motorized trails and recreation facilities 
need significant amounts of work to be maintained to standard and 
provide quality recreational experiences for our visitors. I have 
determined that it is not a responsible use of public funds to add 24 
to 43 miles of new trail, estimated to cost $40,000 per mile to build. 
Therefore, I recommend that this project be cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony V. Scardina, District Ranger 
or Julie Moyer, IDT Leader, Bradford Ranger District, 29 Forest Service 
Drive, Bradford, PA 16701, telephone (814)-363-6000.
    Responsible Official: Leanne Marten, Forest Supervisor, Allegheny 
National Forest, 4 Farm Colony Drive, Warren, PA 16365, is the 
responsible official.

    Dated: July 10, 2009.
Leanne M. Marten,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E9-16914 Filed 7-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
Case 3:11-cv-03183-FLW-TJB Document 4 Filed 06/03/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 97
Case 3:11-cv-03183-FLW-TJB Document 4 Filed 06/03/11 Page 2 of 10 PageID: 98
Case 3:11-cv-03183-FLW-TJB Document 4 Filed 06/03/11 Page 3 of 10 PageID: 99
Case 3:11-cv-03183-FLW-TJB Document 4 Filed 06/03/11 Page 4 of 10 PageID: 100
Case 3:11-cv-03183-FLW-TJB Document 4 Filed 06/03/11 Page 5 of 10 PageID: 101
Case 3:11-cv-03183-FLW-TJB Document 4 Filed 06/03/11 Page 6 of 10 PageID: 102
Case 3:11-cv-03183-FLW-TJB Document 4 Filed 06/03/11 Page 7 of 10 PageID: 103
Case 3:11-cv-03183-FLW-TJB Document 4 Filed 06/03/11 Page 8 of 10 PageID: 104
Case 3:11-cv-03183-FLW-TJB Document 4 Filed 06/03/11 Page 9 of 10 PageID: 105
Case 3:11-cv-03183-FLW-TJB Document 4 Filed 06/03/11 Page 10 of 10 PageID: 106
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

12-1515

Tammy Duffy v. GE Healthcare, Inc, et al

3-11-cv-00468

O R D E R 

In accordance with the agreement of the parties in the above-captioned case, the matter is hereby 

dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), without cost to either party. A certified copy of this 

order is issued in lieu of a formal mandate.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Dated: June 28, 2012

SLC/cc: Mark DianaEsq.

Maurice W. McLaughlinEsq.

Jocelyn A. MercedEsq.

Pauline M.K. YoungEsq.

Case 3:11-cv-00468-PGS-LHG Document 38 Filed 06/28/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 736
eXHIBIT 10.95.1


 


SECOND
amendment to the


MANAGeMENT
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


As
AMENDED AND RESTATED


 


The
Management Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective July
12, 2011, and as subsequently amended (the “Plan”), is hereby amended effective
as of the close of December 31, 2012.


(1)            Explanation of Amendment


The Plan is amended to (a) replace the Plan
with the Duke Energy Corporation Executive Savings Plan as a vehicle for the
deferral of base salary after 2012, and (b) continue, for 2012, the matching
contributions of those individuals who were members of the Progress Energy,
Inc. SMC in the same manner before and after the merger by and between Progress
Energy, Inc. and Duke Energy Corporation.


(2)           Amendment 


(a)            Section 1.44 of the Plan is
amended in its entirety to read as follows:


“1.44        “SMC
Participant” shall mean, with respect to the entire 2012 calendar year during
which such individual remains an Eligible Employee, an employee of the Company
who was a member of the “Senior Management Committee” of Progress Energy, Inc.
immediately prior to July 2, 2012.”


(b)            Section 3.2 of the Plan is
hereby amended by adding the following at the end thereof:


“No
Matching Allocation shall be made under the Plan with respect to Salary earned
after the 2012 Plan Year.”


(c)             Article III is hereby amended
by the addition of the following new Section 3.3:


“3.3            Freezing
of Deferrals


No
Participant shall be permitted to make a Deferral Election with respect to
Salary earned after the 2012 Plan Year.”


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Progress Energy, Inc. has caused this Amendment to be executed effective as of
the date specified below.


PROGRESS
ENERGY, INC.


 


By:            
Jennifer L. Weber_________________


Title:   Executive Vice President


 


Date:  December 26, 2012
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-10447

(Summary Calendar) 

 

WILBUR L. WILLIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.,

d/b/a ITT TECHNICAL INSTITUTE,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas 

(95-CV-1966)

 

February 10, 1998

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In this Title VII employment discrimination case, PlaintiffAppellant Wilbur L. Willis appeals from the district court’s grant

of summary judgment, dismissing his action against DefendantAppellee ITT Educational Services, Inc., d/b/a ITT Technical

Institute. After reviewing de novo all of the facts as presented
2When Appellant refused to include in the record on appeal a

transcript of the portion of the summary judgment hearing

containing the ruling of the district court, we ordered a

transcript prepared, the costs of which are assessed as costs of

this appeal. 

by the parties, we reach the same conclusion as did the district

court —— for the reasons advanced by that court —— and append

hereto a copy of the transcript of the district court’s oral

ruling.2 Accordingly, the judgment of the district court, is, in

all respects, affirmed at appellant’s cost. The parties’

respective motions for attorney’s fees are denied. 

AFFIRMED; costs assessed to Appellant; parties’ motions for

attorney’s fees denied
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Globalstar, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify that:





This quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 5, 2011By:
/s/ Peter J. DaltonPeter J. Dalton

Chief Executive OfficerDated: May 5, 2011By:
/s/ Dirk WildDirk Wild

Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CAMDEN VICINAGE

CITY SELECT AUTO SALES, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

DAVID RANDALL ASSOCIATES, INC., 

et al.,

 Defendant.

Civil No. 11-2658-JBS-KMW

SCHEDULING ORDER

This Scheduling Order confirms the directives given to 

counsel at the initial scheduling conference held pursuant to Rule 

16, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on January 10, 2014; and the Court 

noting the following appearances: Tod A. Lewis, Esquire (admitted 

pro hac vice), appearing on behalf of the plaintiff; and F. Emmett 

Fitzpatrick, III, Esquire, appearing on behalf of the defendants; and 

for good cause shown:

IT IS this 10th day of January, 2014, hereby ORDERED:

1. Initial written discovery requests shall be served by 

January 31, 2014. Any responses, answers and objections to initial 

written discovery requests shall be served in accordance with Court 

Rules.

2. The Court will conduct a telephone status conference 

on March 12, 2014, at 11:30 a.m. Counsel for plaintiff shall 

initiate the telephone call.

3. Any application for an extension of time beyond the 

deadlines set herein shall be made in writing to the undersigned and 

served upon all counsel prior to expiration of the period sought to 

be extended, and shall disclose in the application all such extensions 

previously obtained, the precise reasons necessitating the 

application showing good cause under FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b), and whether 

adversary counsel agree with the application. The schedule set 

herein will not be extended unless good cause is shown.

Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 99 Filed 01/10/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 3668
THE FAILURE OF A PARTY OR ATTORNEY TO OBEY THIS ORDER MAY 

RESULT IN IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 16(f).

s/ Karen M. Williams 

KAREN M. WILLIAMS

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Hon. Jerome B. Simandle

 

Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 99 Filed 01/10/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 3669
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coastal Media Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jan Aaron
Sigurgeirson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
7th day of February 2008.


/s/ Jan Aaron Sigurgeirson
----------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
329606-1

557114.1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Alan C. Milstein, Esquire, hereby certify as follows:

I am an attorney at law admitted to practice before this Court and am a member of the

firm Sherman, Silverstein, Kohl, Rose & Podolsky, attorneys for Plaintiff CITY SELECT AUTO

SALES, INC., a New Jersey corporation, individually and as the representative of a class of

similarly situated persons in the above-captioned matter. On Thursday, January 09, 2014, I

electronically filed the foregoing with the United States District Court for the District of New

Jersey, using the CM/ECF system and served the same on the following persons in the matter

shown:

Served via CM/ECF

Emmett Fitzpatrick, Esquire

Flamm, Boroff & Bacine, PC

794 Penllyn Pike

Blue Bell, PA 19422

SHERMAN, SILVERSTEIN, KOHL,

ROSE & PODOLSKY, P.A.

BY: S/Alan C. Milstein

Alan C. Milstein

East Gate Center

308 Harper Drive

Suite 200

Moorestown, NJ 0857

Telephone: (856) 662-0700

FAX: (856) 488-4744

Counsel for Plaintiff, City Select Auto

Sales, Inc. individually and as the

representative of a class of similarlysituated persons and the Class

DATE: Thursday, January 09, 2014

Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 96-1 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 3649
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antwonne D. WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-7240.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 13, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 18, 2012.

Antwonne D. White, Appellant Pro Se. Monica D. Coleman, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antwonne D. White seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

*220We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that White has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certifícate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB -KMW   Document 38    Filed 01/18/12   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 2686

Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB -KMW   Document 38    Filed 01/18/12   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2687
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5297

For the relief of the Big Spring Independent School District. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2004

Mr. NEUGEBAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

For the relief of the Big Spring Independent School District.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR GRANTS UNDER RURAL AND 

4 LOW-INCOME SCHOOL PROGRAM. 

5 The Big Spring Independent School District in the 

6 State of Texas shall be eligible to receive a grant under 

7 subpart 2 of part B of title VI of the Elementary and 

8 Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7351 et seq.; 

9 commonly referred to as the ‘‘Rural and Low-Income 

10 School Program’’) for any fiscal year in which the Big 

11 Spring Independent School District—
2

•HR 5297 IH 

1 (1) meets the eligibility criterion of section 

2 6221(b)(1)(A) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 

3 7351(b)(1)(A)); and 

4 (2) would meet the eligibility criterion of section 

5 6221(b)(1)(B) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 

6 7351(b)(1)(A)), but for the inclusion of the Federal 

7 prison population in the calculation of the school lo8 cale codes described in that section.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

November 13,
2007

U.
S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N. E.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

The
certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not to be deemed to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part of the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q (the "Report") accompanying this letter and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

I,
Robert E. Driscoll, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Mirant North America, LLC (the "Company"), certify that, subject to the qualifications noted below, to
the best of my knowledge:



|Name: | /s/ROBERT E. DRISCOLLRobert E. Driscoll President and Chief
Executive Officer | 
|----- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mirant North America, LLC and will be retained by Mirant
North America, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1305 

To establish a Federal cost share percentage for the Milk River Project 

in the State of Montana. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 2, 2019 

Mr. TESTER (for himself and Mr. DAINES) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To establish a Federal cost share percentage for the Milk 

River Project in the State of Montana. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘St. Mary’s Reinvest5 ment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COST SHARE FOR THE MILK RIVER PROJECT. 

7 (a) DEFINITION OF MILK RIVER PROJECT.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—In this Act, the term ‘‘Milk 

9 River Project’’ means the Bureau of Reclamation 

10 project authorized by the Secretary of the Interior 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1305 IS

1 on March 14, 1903, under the Act of June 17, 1902 

2 (32 Stat. 388, chapter 1093), commencing at Lake 

3 Sherburne and providing water to a point approxi4 mately 6 miles east of Nashua, Montana. 

5 (2) INCLUSIONS.—The term ‘‘Milk River 

6 Project’’ includes— 

7 (A) Swiftcurrent Dike; 

8 (B) Lake Sherburne; 

9 (C) Nelson and Fresno dams, dikes, and 

10 reservoirs; 

11 (D) St. Mary, Dodson, Vandalia, and Par12 adise Diversion dams; 

13 (E) Dodson pumping plant; and 

14 (F) associated siphons, canals, drops, 

15 laterals, and drains. 

16 (b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost of 

17 the operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of the 

18 Milk River Project shall be 75 percent, which shall not 

19 be reimbursable to the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 3 Hon. Faith S. Hochberg
Crim. No. 11-290 (FSH)
v. 3
CONTINUANCE ORDER
PETER HALAS :

This matter having come before the Court on the joint
application of Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the
District of New Jersey (by Brian L. Urbano, Assistant U.S.
Attorney), and defendant Peter Halas (by K. Anthony Thomas, Esq.)
for an order granting a continuance of the proceedings in the
above-captioned matter, and the defendant being aware that she
has the right to have the matter brought to trial within 70 days
of the date of his appearance before a judicial officer of this
court pursuant to Title 18 of the United States Code, Section
3161(c) (1), and as the defendant has consented to such a
continuance, and for good and sufficient cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should
be continued for the following reasons:

1, Plea negotiations are currently in progress, and
both the United States and the defendants desire additional time
to finalize a plea agreement, which would render trial of this

matter unnecessary;


2. Defendant has consented to the aforementioned
continuance; and

3. Pursuant to Title 18 of the United States Code,
Section 3161(h) (8), the ends of justice served by granting the
continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the
defendant in a speedy trial.

WHEREFORE, on this ac day of October, 2011,

IT IS ORDERED that defense motions shall be filed by
November 28, 2011, the government's reply shall by filed by
December 5, 2011, the defense surreply, if any, shall be filed by
December 12, 2011, the argument of the motions is scheduled for
December 19, 2011, and the trial is scheduled for January 3,

2011; and


IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period from September
26, 2011, through January 3, 2011, shall be excludable in
computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, pursuant to

Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h) (8).

HON. FAITH “SS HOCHBERG

United States District! ge

I hereby consent to the form

wen L. URBANO, AUSA