alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 508 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 508

To provide that, in establishing wage schedules for certain prevailing 
    rate employees with respect to whom the Government is currently 
   experiencing recruitment and retention problems, rates of pay for 
 comparable positions in the nearest, most similar wage area shall be 
                          taken into account.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2003

  Mr. Wicker introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that, in establishing wage schedules for certain prevailing 
    rate employees with respect to whom the Government is currently 
   experiencing recruitment and retention problems, rates of pay for 
 comparable positions in the nearest, most similar wage area shall be 
                          taken into account.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METHODOLOGY FOR ESTABLISHING CERTAIN WAGE SCHEDULES.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of applying section 5343(d) of title 
5, United States Code, with respect to prevailing rate employees of the 
Department of Defense within the Northern Mississippi Wage Grade Area, 
all wage schedules and rates for such employees shall be established--
            (1) in accordance with paragraph (2)(A) thereof (rather 
        than paragraph (1) or (2)(B) thereof); and
            (2) deeming all conditions for the application of such 
        paragraph (2)(A) to have been met.
    (b) Commencement Date.--Wage schedules and rates satisfying the 
requirements of subsection (a) shall be established, and shall apply 
with respect to wages for service performed in pay periods beginning, 
no later than 12 months after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Termination.--
            (1) In general.--The requirements of subsection (a) shall 
        remain in effect until such time as, upon written request of 
        the lead agency for the Northern Mississippi Wage Grade Area 
        (together with supporting documentation), the Office of 
        Personnel Management determines that the recruitment and 
        retention problems giving rise to this Act no longer exist.
            (2) Consultation.--Any determination under paragraph (1) 
        shall be made in consultation with the Federal Prevailing Rate 
        Advisory Committee under section 5347 of title 5, United States 
        Code.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:11-cv-00902-FSH -PS Document 27 Filed 06/16/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 383
Case 2:11-cv-00902-FSH -PS Document 27 Filed 06/16/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 384
Exhibit 32.1



                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blugrass Energy, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-Q  for the  quarter  ended  December  31,  2008 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Leslie
A.  Schaefer,  Chairman and Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Leslie A. Schaefer
Leslie A. Schaefer
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
February 20, 2009

      This certification  accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  and  shall  not be  deemed  to be  incorporated  by
reference into any filing under the  Securities Act of 1933, as amended,  or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[904 NYS2d 639]

#### Salvatore Sciortino, Respondent, v Public Storage, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

May 10, 2010

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Cullen & Dykman, LLP,*Brooklyn *(Graig A. Russo*of counsel), for appellant.

*23OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed without costs and the action is dismissed.

Plaintiff commenced this small claims action to recover $5,000 in damages after plaintiffs camper was allegedly ruined while stored at defendant’s facility. Plaintiff attributed the damage to vandalism. After a nonjury trial, the District Court found that the damage to plaintiffs camper was the result of defendant’s negligence and awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $5,000. Defendant appeals.

We find that substantial justice was not done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law (UDCA 1807). The lease agreement between the parties stated that defendant, a self-service storage facility *(see*Lien Law § 182), is not a warehouse. It also contained several exculpatory clauses, including a clause stating that defendant is not responsible for any personal property stored by plaintiff. Under the facts presented, the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, including section 7-204 thereof, which provides that a warehouseman is responsible for negligent damage to goods in his custody and sets forth the sole manner in which a warehouse owner may properly limit his liability, do not apply *(see*Lien Law § 182 [1] [a]). Moreover, plaintiff has not demonstrated that the damage to his camper, which he attributed to vandalism, was the result of defendant’s willful or grossly negligent acts, in which case the exculpatory clauses would not be enforced *(see Kalisch-Jarcho, Inc. v City of New York,*58 NY2d 377, 384-385 [1983]). Under these circumstances, there was no basis for the District Court’s determination of liability. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the action is dismissed.

Tanenbaum, J.E, Molía and Iannacci, JJ., concur.
I 

★

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 516

To amend the General Education Provisions Act to clarify the definition 

of a student regarding family educational and privacy rights. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2003

Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota (for himself, Mr. DELAY, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. 

RAMSTAD, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin, 

Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. BURR, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. PICKERING, Mr. HOSTETTLER, and Mr. ADERHOLT) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the General Education Provisions Act to clarify 

the definition of a student regarding family educational 

and privacy rights.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO GENERAL EDUCATION PROVI4 SIONS ACT. 

5 Paragraph (6) of subsection (a) of section 444 of the 

6 General Education Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. 1232g; also 

7 known as the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act 

8 of 1974) is amended by inserting ‘‘(other than a person 
2

HR 516 IH1S 

1 educated at a home school, whether or not a home school 

2 is treated as a home school or a private school under State 

3 law)’’ after ‘‘does not include a person’’.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 10.28
 DISBURSEMENT REQUEST AND AUTHORIZATION
 Principal
    
    Loan Date
    
    Maturity
    
    Loan No
    
    Call / Coll
    
    Account
    
    Officer
    
    Initials$4,606,511.50
    
    09-07-2007
    
    03-23-2008
    
    
    3787
    
    
    
    2200
    
    
    
    
    
    242
 
 Borrower:
    
    Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC (TIN:
    
    Lender:
    
    Home Federal Savings Bank48-1200438)
    
    
    
    Business Banking106 W Main, PO Box C
    
    
    
    1016 Civic Center Dr NW Suite 300Riceville, IA 50466
    
    
    
    Rochester, MN 55901
 LOAN TYPE.
 PRIMARY PURPOSE OF LOAN.
 o
    
    Personal, Family, or Household Purposes or Personal Investment.
 þ
    
    Business (Including Real Estate Investment).
 SPECIFIC PURPOSE.
 DISBURSEMENT INSTRUCTIONS.
 Other Disbursements:
    
    $
    4,601,111.50$3,517,572.00 Funds already disbursed$1,083,539.50 To be disbursed to customer at closingTotal Financed Prepaid Finance Charges:
    
    $
    5,400.00$5,400.00 Modification FeeNote Principal:
    
    $
    4,606,511.50
  FINANCIAL CONDITION. BY SIGNING THIS AUTHORIZATION, BORROWER REPRESENTS AND WARRANTS TO
LENDER THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND CORRECT AND THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO
MATERIAL ADVERSE CHANGE IN BORROWERS FINANCIAL CONDITION AS DISCLOSED IN BORROWERS MOST
RECENT FINANCIAL STATEMENT TO LENDER. THIS AUTHORIZATION IS DATED SEPTEMBER 7, 2007.
 BORROWER:
 HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC
 By:
    
    /s/ Steven K. Eastman       President
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Bernard RetterathSteve Eastman, President of Homeland Energy
    
    
    
    
    
    Bernard Retterath, Treasurer of Homeland EnergySolutions, LLC
    
    
    
    
    
    Solutions, LLC
----

EXHIBIT 12.1 

CERTIFICATION 

I, William Bruce Hicks, certify that: 

- I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of SUNDAY Communications  Limited;    
- Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the  statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     
- Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial  information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects  the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the  registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this report;    
- The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for  establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in  Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

> 
(a)Designed such disclosure    controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures    to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period    in which this report is being prepared; 
(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the    registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and    procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such    evaluation; and 
(c)Disclosed in this report any change in    the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred    during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected,    or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal    control over financial reporting; and - The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,  based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial  reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of  registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent  functions); 

(a)All significant deficiencies and    material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over    financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial    information; and 
(b)Any fraud, whether or not material,    that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in    the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 
Date: June 30, 2005 
By: /s/ WILLIAM BRUCE HICKSName: William Bruce HicksTitle: Group Managing Director
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 1 Filed 07/21/09 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 1
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 1 Filed 07/21/09 Page 2 of 10 PageID: 2
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 1 Filed 07/21/09 Page 3 of 10 PageID: 3
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 1 Filed 07/21/09 Page 4 of 10 PageID: 4
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 1 Filed 07/21/09 Page 5 of 10 PageID: 5
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 1 Filed 07/21/09 Page 6 of 10 PageID: 6
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 1 Filed 07/21/09 Page 7 of 10 PageID: 7
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 1 Filed 07/21/09 Page 8 of 10 PageID: 8
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 1 Filed 07/21/09 Page 9 of 10 PageID: 9
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 1 Filed 07/21/09 Page 10 of 10 PageID: 10
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-62,484] 

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on January 10, 2008, applicable to workers of Halmode Apparel, a Division of Kellwood Company, New York, New York. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 25, 2008 (73 FR 4634).                 

At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in activities related to the production women's apparel samples and patterns. 

New information provided by the company official shows that some of workers wages at Halmode Apparel are reported under Federal Employment Identification Number (FEIN) for Halmode Apparel/Liz Claiborne Dresses. 

Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to include workers of Halmode Apparel, a Division of Kellwood Company, 1400 Broadway, New York, New York, whose wages were reported under the FEIN for Halmode/Liz Claiborne Dresses. 

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-62,484 is hereby issued as follows: 

All workers of Halmode Apparel, Halmode/Liz Claiborne Dresses, 1400 Broadway, a Division of Kellwood Company, New York, New York, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after November 4, 2007, through January 10, 2010, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of July 2009. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-16605 Filed 7-13-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### Kennedy *v.*Brand.

Lumpkin, J. — Under the plain and unequivocal mandate of section 4203 of the code, when exceptions to the report of an auditor are submitted to a jury, they must return a verdict on each exception *seriatim.*Accordingly, where divers exceptions to an auditor’s report were thus submitted, a verdict in these words, “We, the jury, find to sustain the auditor’s report,” was contrary to law, and must be set aside.

December 21,1894.

Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Judge Clark. Rockdale superior court. April term, 1894.

J. N. Glenn, for plaintiff in error.

J. R. Irwin, *contra.*

*Judgment reversed,.*
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATE      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002 **

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |                                                                                               |                                                  |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                                                                          |                                             |
| December              8, 2005 | By:                                                                                      | /s/ JAMES              D.              BURCHETTA |
|                          |                                                                                                    |
|                          | James                D. BurchettaCo-Chairman, President and Chief Executive                Officer |

|   |                                                                                                                   |                                        |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | By:                                                                                                          | /s/ KATHERINE                A. DERING |
|   |                                                                                                                        |
|   | Katherine                  A.                  DeringChief Financial Officer, Treasurer and                  Secretary |
|   |                                                                                                                   |
|   |                                                                                                                   |
| -41-   |

----
PROB I2A

(7/93)

United States District Court

for

District of New Jersey

Report on Offender Under Supervision

Name ofOffender: Christopher Hurst Cr.: 11 -00354-001

PACTS #: 61967

Name of Sentencing Judicial Officer: THE HONORABLE KATHARINE S. HAYDEN

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Date ofOriginal Sentence: April 16, 2012

Original Offense: Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon

Original Sentence: 30 months imprisonment, 3 years supervised release; $100 Special Assessment

Special Conditions: Alcohol and Substance Abuse Testing and Treatment, Gang/Criminal Associations

Prohibition

Type ofSupervision: Supervised Release Date_Su2eryision_Commenced^_01^^

NONCOMPLIANCE SUMMARY

Theoffender has notcomplied with the following condition(s) ofsupervision:

Violation Number Nature ofNoncomoliance

1 On May 19, 2015, Jersey City police detectives observed Hurst meeting with

Terrence Glenn at Garfield and Fulton Avenues, where the offender allegedly

provided Glenn with a white plastic bag in exchange for a sum of currency.

The offender then departed the area in his vehicle. Glenn was stopped by

detectives and a search of his person revealed a white plastic bag containing

marijuana weighing 29 gross grams. The offender was followed and stopped a

short distance later. He was ordered out of his vehicle and arrested. A total of

$470 was seized from his person assuspected narcotics proceeds. Aconsented

search of his vehicle concluded with negative results for narcotics. The

offender was charged with Distributing, Dispensing or Possessing within 500

Feet of Public Property. Hewas released ona $1,000 cash bail.

This matter is pending in Jersey City Municipal Court and was forwarded to

the Hudson County Prosecutors Office for consideration. There is no

scheduled court date as ofthis time.

U.S. Probation Officer Action:

With the exception ofthis arrest, the offender has remained compliant with all conditions ofsupervised

release. He has remained gainfully employed with CBA, a circular distribution company in Jersey City,

andhas been pursuing a careerin themusic industry as a rapartist.

Case 2:11-cr-00354-KSH Document 17 Filed 06/17/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 50
Prob 12A - page 2

Christopher Hurst

It is respectfully requested that the Court refrain from taking action until the offender's pendingstate case

is resolved. The offender will be closely supervised by the probation office and we will keep the Court

apprised of any changes or the possible need to initiate violation proceedings.

Respectfully submitted,

Mmreen icelly

By: Gisella M. Bassolino

U.S. Probation Officer

Date: 06/16/2015

Please check a box below to indicate the Court's direction regarding action to be taken in this case:

Formal Court Action to be Taken at This Time

V Submita Request for Modifying the Conditions or Term of Supervision

r Submita Requestfor Warrantor Summonsj

r Other

Signature afJudicial

Case 2:11-cr-00354-KSH Document 17 Filed 06/17/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 51