alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

34. Unemployed jobseekers by sex, reason for unemployment, and active jobsearch methods used

[Numbers in thousands]

Sex and reason

2011

Unemployed Percent of jobseekers using method

Average

number of

methods

used

Total Jobseekers

Contacted

employer

directly

Sent out

resumes

or filled

out

applications

Placed

or

answered

ads

Contacted

friends

or

relatives

Public

employment

agency

Private

employment

agency

Other

Total unemployed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,747 12,517 51.5 55.6 18.5 28.8 21.0 8.6 15.4 2.0

Job losers and persons who completed temporary

jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,106 6,876 53.5 54.9 20.9 32.4 24.9 10.2 16.3 2.1

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 956 50.6 58.6 18.3 25.8 17.8 8.0 14.2 1.9

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,401 3,401 48.9 55.6 15.6 24.1 16.9 6.9 15.2 1.8

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,284 1,284 48.7 57.7 13.5 24.8 13.1 5.3 12.3 1.8

Men. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,684 6,875 52.4 53.0 18.0 30.4 22.0 9.0 15.7 2.0

Job losers and persons who completed temporary

jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,968 4,159 54.3 52.1 20.1 33.3 24.8 10.1 16.8 2.1

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 494 494 51.8 56.4 17.8 27.7 18.5 8.3 13.3 1.9

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,545 1,545 49.1 52.5 14.4 25.5 18.2 7.4 15.2 1.8

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 678 678 48.8 57.4 13.1 25.8 15.8 6.0 11.9 1.8

Women. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,063 5,642 50.4 58.8 19.1 26.9 19.8 8.2 15.1 2.0

Job losers and persons who completed temporary

jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,139 2,718 52.2 59.1 22.1 30.9 25.1 10.3 15.6 2.2

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 463 463 49.2 60.9 18.8 23.7 17.0 7.6 15.1 1.9

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,857 1,857 48.7 58.1 16.5 22.9 15.8 6.5 15.1 1.8

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 605 605 48.6 58.1 13.9 23.6 10.0 4.5 12.7 1.7

1 Data on the number of jobseekers and the jobsearch methods used exclude persons on temporary layoff.

NOTE: The jobseekers total is less than the total unemployed because it does not include persons on temporary layoff. The percent using each method will always total more

than 100 because many jobseekers use more than one method. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

1
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 By:
    /s/  Michael NoleName:
    Michael NoleTitle:
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    May 14, 2010
EX-10.25



 Exhibit 10.25 
 AMENDMENT TO APPENDIX A 
 Supplemental Retirement Benefits

 This Amendment to Appendix A of the Amended Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of
December 21, 2012, by and between MKS Instruments, Inc. (the “Corporation”), and Gerald Colella (the “Employee”). 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Employee previously entered into an Appendix A to Employee’s Amended Employment Agreement, dated November 10, 2008 (the “Agreement”), which
Agreement may be amended by a written instrument executed by both parties; and 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation and the
Employee desire to amend the Agreement to comply with Internal Revenue Service Notice 2010-80, as set forth below. 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants contained herein, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree to amend Section 4.5 of the Agreement to provide as follows: 

 

	 	“4.5	Release.    Benefits payable under this Appendix A (other than death benefits payable under Section 6) are specifically conditioned upon
and provided in exchange for Employee signing a separation agreement that releases the Corporation from any liabilities that may have arisen as a result of Employee’s employment and/or termination of employment with the Corporation. The time
period for returning such separation agreement shall be designated by the Corporation and shall not be less than 21 days nor more than 45 days following Employee’s Separation from Service. If such time period (including any period for
revocation) begins in one taxable year and ends in a subsequent taxable year, any payments conditioned upon such separation agreement shall be made in the later taxable year. Payments of benefits hereunder shall not be made unless and until the
separation agreement has been signed and timely returned by Employee and the specified period for revocation of the separation agreement has expired without revocation. In the event Employee terminates employment with the Corporation for any reason
other than death (including Retirement) without satisfying the requirements of this Section 4.5 all benefits shall be forfeited, and no amount shall be payable under this Appendix A.” 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date and year first above written. 

 

	
	MKS INSTRUMENTS, INC.
	
	/s/ Leo Berlinghieri
	
	 
	
	EMPLOYEE
	
	/s/ Gerald Colella
Case 2:1 1-cv-04073-JLL -MAH Document 35-1 Filed 02/15/12 Page 1 of I PagelD: 234

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR TUE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

DEBORAH MOULTON, individually and Civil Action No. 2:11-CV-04073-JLL-MAH

on behalf of all others similarly situated,

CLASS ACTION

Plaintiffs,

V.

LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics

USA, Inc.,

Defendants.

CONSENT ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR DEBORAH MOULTON TO RESPOND TO LG

ELECTRONICS, USA, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE CLASS COMPLAINT

With the consent of counsel for the respective parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the time

plaintiff Deborah Moulton shall respond to LG ElectronicsUSA, Inc.’s motion to dismiss is enlarged

to and including March 13, 2012

p

t

ON. JOSE L. LINARES, U,S.DJ.

Entered: /

The parties hereby signify this consent to the above order.

s/Christopher N. Tomlin

Christopher N. Tomlin, Esq.

John B. Kearney, Esq.

BALLARD SPAHR LLP

210 Lake Drive East, Suite 200

Cherry Hill, NJ 08002

Attorneysfor Defendants LG Electronics, Inc.

and LG Electronics USA, Inc.

s/Gary S. Graifman

Gary S. Graifman, Esq.

Kantrowitz, Goldhamer

& Graifman, P.C.

210 Summit Avenue

Montvale, NJ 07642

Attorneysfor Plaintiff

Case 2:11-cv-04073-JLL -MAH Document 37 Filed 02/21/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 237
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Q Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Deborah A. Eppstein, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: August 9, 2012 | By:    | /s/ DEBORAH A. EPPSTEIN                                        
|-------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                     | Name:  | Deborah A. Eppstein, PhD                                       
|                     | Title: | Chief Executive Officer, President(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT

A

Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH-PS Document 1-1 Filed 08/02/11 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 14
FNA0000001

Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH-PS Document 1-1 Filed 08/02/11 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 15
FNA0000002

Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH-PS Document 1-1 Filed 08/02/11 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 16
FNA0000003

Case 2:11-cv-04487-KSH-PS Document 1-1 Filed 08/02/11 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 17
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of MCA Holdings Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, I, Wai Leung Cheng, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  May 14, 2007 MCA Holdings Corporation By: /s/ Wai Leung Cheng Wai Leung Cheng  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of MCA Holdings Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, I, Stewart M. Dean, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  May 14, 2007 MCA Holdings Corporation By:  /s/ Stewart M. Dean Stewart M. Dean
[Docket No. 5] 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

CAMDEN VICINAGE

JASON COLE, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH 

AMERICA, LLC, 

 Defendant. 

Civil No. 11-4174 (RMB) 

ORDER 

 THIS MATTER coming before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion 

to Remand for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and the Court 

having considered the papers; and the Court having issued an 

Opinion on the motion; 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED and 

this matter is REMANDED, for lack of subject matter 

jurisdiction, to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, 

Camden County. 

 s/Renée Marie Bumb 

RENÉE MARIE BUMB 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: March 2, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-04174-RMB-JS Document 12 Filed 03/02/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 153
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection  with the  Annual Report of EGPI Firecreek, Inc. (the

"Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with

the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis

R. Alexander, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)

or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

material  respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of

the Company.





/s/ Dennis R. Alexander

-----------------------

Dennis R. Alexander

Chief Financial Officer



Date: April 12, 2004
Case 3:11-cv-03962-MLC-DEA Document 165 Filed 08/16/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 3800
Case 3:11-cv-03962-MLC-DEA Document 165 Filed 08/16/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 3801
Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW Document 178 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 9661
Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW Document 178 Filed 09/11/15 Page 2 of 6 PageID: 9662
Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW Document 178 Filed 09/11/15 Page 3 of 6 PageID: 9663
Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW Document 178 Filed 09/11/15 Page 4 of 6 PageID: 9664
Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW Document 178 Filed 09/11/15 Page 5 of 6 PageID: 9665
Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW Document 178 Filed 09/11/15 Page 6 of 6 PageID: 9666
Case 2:11-cv-03849-SDW -MCA Document 16 Filed 10/21/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 96
Case 2:11-cv-03849-SDW -MCA Document 16 Filed 10/21/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 97
Case 2:11-cv-03849-SDW -MCA Document 16 Filed 10/21/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 98
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 137 (Monday, July 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 35197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17206]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Cardiac Translational Research 
Implementation Program.
    Date: July 24, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Youngsuk Oh, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 7182, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-0277, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f28b9d9ab29f939b9edc9c9b9adc959d84"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e6771765e737f77723070777630797168">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 14, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-17206 Filed 7-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 3:11-cv-02276-MLC-DEA   Document 12   Filed 05/25/11   Page 1 of 3 PageID: 131

Case 3:11-cv-02276-MLC-DEA   Document 12   Filed 05/25/11   Page 2 of 3 PageID: 132

Case 3:11-cv-02276-MLC-DEA   Document 12   Filed 05/25/11   Page 3 of 3 PageID: 133
#### Brown *v.*Lapham and another.1

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

April 1, 1886.)

1. Patents tor Inventions—License—Estoppel .

A licensee under a patent, is estopped to deny its validity on any question arising out of that relation between the parties, *(Kinsman*v. *Parkhurst,*18 How. 289,) but it does not follow that he will be always estopped because he has stood in that relation.

2. Same—When Licensee mat Challenge Validity of Patent.

When a licensee under a patent stands out from under the license, and claims nothing from it, and does nothing more under it, with full knowledge to the licensor of his position, he is at as full liberty to contest the patent as any one.

3. Same—When Infringement by Licensee will be Enjoined.

Taking and operating- under a license is sufficient evidence of acquiescence to warrant an injunction without any previous adjudication, if the patent is unchallenged.

In Equity.

*B. F. Clark,*for plaintiff.

*Samuel Greenbaum,*for defendants.

1

 Reported by Charles C. Linthicum, Esq., of the Chicago bar.

Wheeler, J.

The defendants appear to have been licensees of the plaintiff under his patent No. 264,854, dated September 26, 1882, for an improvement in stylographic pens, and afterwards to have repudiated the license and continued their infringement in defiance of the patent. The plaintiff has moved for a preliminary injunction. On this motion the defendants have filed affidavits tending to show that a manufacturer for the plaintiff of another style of pen, and his own workmen, devised this improvement for the plaintiff, and that they were the inventors of it, although the plaintiff got the patent for it. The plaintiff relies upon the estoppel of the defendants to deny the validity of the patent growing out of the license and the operating under it by them. There is no fair question but that a licensee under a patent is estopped to deny its validity on any question arising out of that relation between the parties. *Kinsman v. Parkhurst,*18 How. 289. It does not follow that lie will be always estopped because be lias stood in that relation. When he stands out from under the license, and claims nothing from it, and does nothing more under it, with full knowledge to the licensor of his position, he would appear to be at as full liberty to contest the patent as any one. In this case, taking and operating under the license would appear to be sufficient evidence of acquiescence to warrant this injunction without any previous adjudication, if the patent was unchallenged. As it is, the plaintiff must stand upon the validity of his patent, and maintain, it against this attack. On cross-examination of these witnesses, and the whole evidence when put in, this attack may not amount to any*78thiüg decisive. As it is, upon this question as submitted, the affidavits raise sufficient' doubts about the patent to stand in the way of granting this motion now. Motion denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 6

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                        1,088,819
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                       1,776,105
<RECEIVABLES>                                  261,172
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                       0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,064,875
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                            208,932
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                             0
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                            1,616
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                            1,771
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                            0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                          4,800
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                        32,116
<NET-ASSETS>                                 1,850,605
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                               31,606
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                                  26,548
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         41,739
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                         4,800
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                       41,739
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                        (206,629)
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                              0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                      (155)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                        (33,587)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                            0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                            5,124
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                 26,548
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                         1,960,329
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                          1161.87
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                (16.43)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                              0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                           40
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                            1145.44
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   1.43


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I caused a copy of OREXO AB’S RESPONDING MARKMAN

SUBMISSION and accompanying declarations and exhibits to be served by electronic mail, this 

7th day of December, 2012, upon the following counsel: 

Beth D. Jacob (bjacob@kelleydrye.com) 

Douglass C. Hochstetler (dhochstetler@kelleydrye.com) 

Clifford Katz (ckatz@kelleydrye.com) 

Constantine Koutsoubas (ckoutsoubas@kelleydrye.com)

KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP

101 Park Avenue 

New York, NY 10178 

Tel: (212) 808-7800 

Arnold B. Calmann (abc@saiber.com) 

Jeffrey S. Soos (js@saiber.com) 

Katherine A. Escanlar (kae@saiber.com) 

SAIBER LLC 

One Gateway Center, 10th Floor 

Newark, NJ 07102-5311 

Tel: (973) 622-3333 

By: s/John E. Flaherty 

 John E. Flaherty 

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW-LHG Document 112-5 Filed 12/07/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 2499