alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.14

 

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.

2013 Non-Employee Director Compensation

(Effective January 1, 2013)

 

	
Annual   fee paid to:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
All non-employee   Directors, including Chairman 
    	
 
    	
$
    	
175,000
    	
(1)
    
	
Chairman 
    	
 
    	
$
    	
25,000
    	
 
    
	
Audit Committee   Chair 
    	
 
    	
$
    	
25,000
    	
 
    
	
Compensation   Committee Chair 
    	
 
    	
$
    	
15,000
    	
 
    
	
Nominating &   Governance Committee Chair 
    	
 
    	
$
    	
10,000
    	
 
    
	
Lead Director 
    	
 
    	
N/A
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Equity   Awards
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
New Director Award   
    	
 
    	
$
    	
75,000
    	
(2)
    



 






(1)                                 Payable quarterly in arrears in cash and/or restricted stock in the proportion elected by each non-employee Director before the end of the prior calendar year.  The number of restricted shares to be issued pursuant to the 2010 Plan in payment of the portion of the annual fee to be paid in restricted stock shall be determined based on the closing price of the Corporation’s common stock on the first trading day of the calendar year, with such number of shares to be rounded to the nearest whole share.  The restricted stock will be granted at the beginning of the year, but will vest over the calendar year 25% on the last day of each calendar quarter.  A non-employee Director, other than those designated by a significant shareholder, must elect to receive at least 2/3 of his or her annual fee in the form of restricted stock if such Director does not meet the thresholds set forth in the Corporation’s Stock Ownership Guidelines for Non-Employee Directors.  If a Director is no longer a Director at the end of the calendar quarter, no cash payment for the quarter will be due to the Director and the restricted shares scheduled to vest as of the end of that quarter and thereafter will be forfeited.  If a non-employee Director joins the board mid-year, the entire amount of their annual fee for the remainder of the year shall be made in cash.

 

(2)                                 The New Director Award vests one-third on the grant date and one-third on each of the first and second anniversaries of the grant date, and shall be made by the Compensation Committee pursuant to the 2010 Plan as soon as practicable upon a non-employee Director’s initial election or appointment to the Board.  The number of shares to be issued in the New Director Award shall be determined based on the closing price of the Corporation’s common stock on the trading day on or after the grant date, with such number of shares to be rounded to the nearest whole share.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6689

LEON LORENZO HARRIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

L. BARLOW, the Sheriff of Piedmont Regional

Jail; SERGEANT COLE, Piedmont Regional Jail,

Medical Department Supervisor; NURSES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-97-19-2)

Submitted: October 10, 1997 Decided: November 12, 1997

Before HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leon Lorenzo Harris, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action without prejudice for failing to comply

with a court order. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Harris v. Barlow,

No. CA-97-19-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 9, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.46

 

SCHEDULE TO FORM OF AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO

WITH CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

	
Executive Officer
    	
 
    	
Title
    
	
Cox, M.*
    	
 
    	
Chief Executive Officer
    
	
Wine, J.*
    	
 
    	
SVP, Chief Financial Officer
    
	
O’Rourke, K.*
    	
 
    	
SVP, Chief Legal Officer
    
	
Hoppes, D.
    	
 
    	
SVP, Ocean Services
    
	
Forest, R.
    	
 
    	
SVP, Operations
    
	
Angoco, V.
    	
 
    	
SVP, Pacific & EVP, MTI
    
	
Weis, P.
    	
 
    	
SVP, CIO
    
	
Gonzales, Y.
    	
 
    	
VP, Human Resources
    
	
Rolfe, R.
    	
 
    	
EVP, Matson Logistics
    


 




* Participants in previous CIC plan
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 134 (Wednesday, July 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM08-11-002]


North American Electric Reliability Corporation; Notice of Filing

July 8, 2009.
    Take notice that on July 6, 2009, the North American Electric 
Reliability Corporation, in compliance with the directives in 
paragraphs 99 and 100 of the Commission's Order 722, issued on March 
20, 2009, 126 FERC 61, 255 (2009), submitted the Western Electricity 
Coordinating Council's (WECC) proposed Violation Risk Factors 
(``VRFs'') for the WECC Regional Difference Requirements to the 
Reliability Standards.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f2b4b7a0b1bd9c9e9b9c97a18782829d8086b294978091dc959d84"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="45030017060a2b292c2b20163035352a373105232037266b222a33">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on August 5, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-16729 Filed 7-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 21.1

OMNIVISION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.        Subsidiaries of OmniVision Technologies, Inc.

Registrant's significant consolidated subsidiaries and the state or jurisdiction of organization of each subsidiary are shown below:

Name of Subsidiary

Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

Percentage
OwnershipOmniVision International Holding Ltd.

Cayman Islands


100
%OmniVision Technology International Ltd.,
(formerly Hua Wei Technology International, Ltd.)

Cayman Islands


100
%OmniVision Technologies (Hong Kong) Company Limited

Hong Kong, China


100
%OmniVision Trading (Hong Kong) Company Limited

Hong Kong, China


100
%OmniVision Semiconductor (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.
(formerly Hua Wei Semiconductor (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.)

China


100
%OmniVision Technologies (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.,
(formerly Shanghai OmniVision IC Design Co., Ltd.)

China


100
%OmniVision CDM Optics, Inc.
(formerly CDM Optics, Inc.)

Delaware


100
%Taiwan OmniVision Technologies Co., Ltd.

Taiwan


100
%Taiwan OmniVision International Technologies, Co., Ltd.

Taiwan


100
%Taiwan OmniVision Investment Holding Co., Ltd.

Taiwan


100
%OmniVision Holding (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd.

Hong Kong, China


100
%OmniVision Investment Holding (BVI) Ltd.

British Virgin Islands


100
%Shanghai OmniVision Semiconductor Technology Co. Ltd.

China


100
%OmniVision Technologies Japan K.K.

Japan


100
%Silicon Optronics, Inc.

Taiwan


44
%


---



QuickLinks
#### Aileen Canty-Cleveland, Respondent, v New York Congregational Nursing Center, Inc., Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 452]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for deprivation of rights pursuant to Fublic Health Law § 2801-d, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated May 1, 2005, as denied that branch of its motion which was for leave to renew and reargue a decision of the same court set forth in an unsigned transcript dated September 20, 2004.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal must be dismissed because no appeal lies from of an order which denies leave to renew and reargue a decision *(see Trepel v Asian Pac. Express Corp.,*16 AD3d 405 [2005]; *Zabezhanskaya v Dinhofer, 2*AD3d 521 [2003]; *Island Holding v O’Brien,*305 AD2d 463 [2003]; *Travelers Prop. Cas. v Powell,*289 AD2d 564 [2001]; *Yan v Klein,*266 AD2d 209 [1999]; *Giardelli v Rainbow Apparel Distrib. Ctr. Corp.,*262 AD2d 603 [1999]; *Tomasello v Choice Care Long Is.,*229 AD2d 527 [1996]). Florio, J.E, Krausman, Luciano and Skelos, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Chanticleer
Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”), I, Eric
S. Lederer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Eric S. Lederer    
| | -----------------------
| | Eric S. Lederer        
| | Chief Financial Officer
| | April 30, 2018
Case 1:11-cr-00137-NLH Document 4 Filed 03/04/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 12
Case 1:11-cr-00137-NLH Document 4 Filed 03/04/11 Page 2 of 10 PageID: 13
Case 1:11-cr-00137-NLH Document 4 Filed 03/04/11 Page 3 of 10 PageID: 14
Case 1:11-cr-00137-NLH Document 4 Filed 03/04/11 Page 4 of 10 PageID: 15
Case 1:11-cr-00137-NLH Document 4 Filed 03/04/11 Page 5 of 10 PageID: 16
Case 1:11-cr-00137-NLH Document 4 Filed 03/04/11 Page 6 of 10 PageID: 17
Case 1:11-cr-00137-NLH Document 4 Filed 03/04/11 Page 7 of 10 PageID: 18
Case 1:11-cr-00137-NLH Document 4 Filed 03/04/11 Page 8 of 10 PageID: 19
Case 1:11-cr-00137-NLH Document 4 Filed 03/04/11 Page 9 of 10 PageID: 20
Case 1:11-cr-00137-NLH Document 4 Filed 03/04/11 Page 10 of 10 PageID: 21
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.15d-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2008
    /s/ Stephen EastmanStephen Eastman,President (Principal Executive Officer)
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 24, 2014

NO. 03-12-00476-CR

Paul Casarez Mata, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Ben Franklin
Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Steven Sjogren, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 13, 2009



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ C. Steven Sjogren                
|C. Steven Sjogren                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Rafeh Hulays, certify that:

1.   I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Pointstar
     Entertainment Corp.:

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material  fact or omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements
     were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the  period  covered by this
     quarterly report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
     procedures  (as  defined in Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and I have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during  the  period in which  this  quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c)   presented in this report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
          the disclosure  controls and procedures  based on our evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed,  based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit  committee of  registrant's  board of directors  (or
     persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6.   I have  indicated  in this  report  whether or not there  were  significant
     changes in internal  controls or in other factors that could  significantly
     affect  internal  controls  subsequent  to  the  date  of our  most  recent
     evaluation,  including any  corrective  actions with regard to  significant
     deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: September 6, 2006


By: /s/ Rafeh Hulays
   -------------------------------
   Rafeh Hulays
   Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 131 (Friday, July 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33268-33269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16361]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of Amspec Services LLC, as a 
Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

[[Page 33269]]


ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Amspec Services LLC, as 
a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Amspec Services LLC, 360 East Elizabeth Ave., Linden, NJ 
07036, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and 
petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs 
purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 
151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory 
analyses and gauger services should request and receive written 
assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or 
gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the 
specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved 
to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by 
calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#640706144a0805060c1524000c174a030b12"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c2a1a0b2ecaea3a0aab382a6aab1eca5adb4">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories. 
http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Amspec Services LLC, as 
commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on March 18, 2009. 
The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for March 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Malana, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: July 2, 2009.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. E9-16361 Filed 7-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 3:11-cv-03054-FLW-DEA Document 1-6 Filed 05/25/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 34
Case 3:11-cv-03054-FLW-DEA Document 1-6 Filed 05/25/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 35
Case 2:11-cv-03614-FSH-PS Document 1-4 Filed 06/20/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 22
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

KOLE AKINOLA, 

 Defendants.

Criminal No.: 11-310 (JLL) 01

ORDER

Please be advised that oral argument on all pending motions is scheduled for Thursday,

November 17, 2011 at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5D of the Martin Luther King Jr., Federal

Building, 50 Walnut Street, Newark, New Jersey. All parties are hereby required to appear. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Jose L. Linares 

Jose L. Linares,

United States District Judge 

Dated: November 1, 2011
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
 Date:  November 19, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Edward J. GildeaEdward J. GildeaChief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)