alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4995

To require the acquisition of intermittent escalators by Federal agencies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2004

Ms. SLAUGHTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To require the acquisition of intermittent escalators by 

Federal agencies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Efficiency 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that—

8 (1) escalators move more people in the United 

9 States than airplanes; 
2

•HR 4995 IH 

1 (2) there are 30,000 escalators in the United 

2 States, with people using escalators 90,000,000,000 

3 times per year; 

4 (3) the national energy use of escalators is esti5 mated at 2,600,000,000 kilowatt hours per year; 

6 (4) the energy use of escalators per year is 

7 equal to powering 375,000 houses, or 45,000,000 

8 60-watt light bulbs; 

9 (5) if the escalators are in continuous oper10 ation, the estimated cost to the country for this en11 ergy usage is $260,000,000 per year; 

12 (6) the European escalator safety code allows 

13 the use of intermittent escalators, which run only 

14 when a passenger rides the escalator; 

15 (7) intermittent escalator models and other en16 ergy efficient motors can increase the country’s en17 ergy savings for escalators by 40 to 50 percent; and 

18 (8) to reduce the energy use of escalators, esca19 lators in Federal buildings should use the intermit20 tent escalator technology. 

21 SEC. 3. AMENDMENT. 

22 Section 543 of the National Energy Conservation 

23 Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 8253) is amended by adding at the 

24 end the following new subsection: 

25 ‘‘(e) INTERMITTENT ESCALATORS.—
3

•HR 4995 IH 

1 ‘‘(1) REQUIREMENT.—Except as provided in 

2 paragraph (2), any escalator acquired for installa3 tion in a Federal building shall be an intermittent 

4 escalator. 

5 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—Paragraph (1) shall not 

6 apply at a location outside the United States where 

7 the Federal agency determines that to acquire an 

8 intermittent escalator would require substantially 

9 greater cost to the Government over the life of the 

10 escalator. 

11 ‘‘(3) ADDITIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION

12 MEASURES.—In addition to complying with para13 graph (1), Federal agencies shall incorporate other 

14 escalator energy conservation measures, as appro15 priate. 

16 ‘‘(4) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this sub17 section, the term ‘intermittent escalator’ means an 

18 escalator that remains in a stationary position until 

19 it automatically operates at the approach of a pas20 senger, returning to a stationary position after the 

21 passenger completes passage.’’.

Æ
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Exploration Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Warren
Robb, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a member of the
Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and






(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.










/s/
Warren Robb


Warren
Robb


Chief
Executive Officer






January
7, 2009








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Exploration Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Warren
Robb, Chief Financial Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of
Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and






(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.




















/s/
Warren Robb


Warren
Robb


Chief
Financial Officer






January
7, 2009
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 1 of 38 PageID: 298
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 2 of 38 PageID: 299
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 3 of 38 PageID: 300
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 4 of 38 PageID: 301
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 5 of 38 PageID: 302
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 6 of 38 PageID: 303
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 7 of 38 PageID: 304
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 8 of 38 PageID: 305
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 9 of 38 PageID: 306
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 10 of 38 PageID: 307
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 11 of 38 PageID: 308
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 12 of 38 PageID: 309
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 13 of 38 PageID: 310
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 14 of 38 PageID: 311
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 15 of 38 PageID: 312
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 16 of 38 PageID: 313
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 17 of 38 PageID: 314
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 18 of 38 PageID: 315
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 19 of 38 PageID: 316
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 20 of 38 PageID: 317
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 21 of 38 PageID: 318
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 22 of 38 PageID: 319
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 23 of 38 PageID: 320
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 24 of 38 PageID: 321
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 25 of 38 PageID: 322
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 26 of 38 PageID: 323
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 27 of 38 PageID: 324
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 28 of 38 PageID: 325
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 29 of 38 PageID: 326
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 30 of 38 PageID: 327
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 31 of 38 PageID: 328
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 32 of 38 PageID: 329
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 33 of 38 PageID: 330
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 34 of 38 PageID: 331
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 35 of 38 PageID: 332
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 36 of 38 PageID: 333
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 37 of 38 PageID: 334
Case 2:11-cv-03503-JLL-MAH Document 5-1 Filed 06/24/11 Page 38 of 38 PageID: 335
- - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

ASTRAZENECA AB, AKTIEBOLAGET 

HÄSSLE, ASTRAZENECA LP, KBI INC., 

and KBI-E INC., 

Plaintiffs and 

Counterclaim-Defendants,

 v. 

HANMI USA, INC., HANMI 

PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., HANMI 

FINE CHEMICAL CO., LTD, and HANMI 

HOLDINGS CO., LTD., 

 

Defendants and 

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs. 

Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00760-JAP-TJB 

Judge Joel A. Pisano 

Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni 

DECLARATION OF PATRICK L. CHEN IN SUPPORT 

OF PLAINTIFFS’ BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO PRECLUDE 

DEFENDANTS’ EXPERT DR. GENCK FROM RELYING 

ON NON-INFRINGEMENT OPINIONS AND EVIDENCE CONCERNING 

“HYDRATES” FIRST IDENTIFIED IN HIS SECOND EXPERT REPORT 

I, Patrick L. Chen, hereby declare as follows, 

1. I am an associate at the law firm of Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, 1290 

Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10104-3800, counsel for Plaintiffs AstraZeneca

AB, Aktiebolaget Hässle, AstraZeneca LP, KBI Inc., and KBI-E Inc. in connection with the 

present action. 

2. I make this Declaration on my personal knowledge in support of Plaintiffs’ 

Motion in Limine to Preclude Defendants’ Expert Dr. Genck from Relying on Non-Infringement 

Opinions and Evidence Concerning “Hydrates” First Identified in His Second Expert Report. 

3. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the March 25, 2013 Second 

Expert Report of Wayne J. Genck, Ph.D. 

4. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the April 8, 2013 Reply Expert 

Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB Document 292-1 Filed 04/29/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 10723
- - 2

Report of Stephen R. Byrn, Ph.D. Concerning Infringement. 

5. Attached as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the transcript of 

the April 25, 2013 deposition of Wayne J. Genck, Ph.D. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: April 29, 2013 

Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB Document 292-1 Filed 04/29/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 10724
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CARLA M. GRENVILLE,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 11-3622 (KSH) 

EQUITABLE ASCENT FINANCIAL, LLC,

ORDER

Defendants.

KATHARINE S. HAYDEN, U.S.D.J.

This matter having come before the Court by way of Magistrate Judge Patty Shwartz’s 

Report and Recommendation [D.E. 11] that the Court dismiss plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to 

appear at an October 17, 2011 Rule 16 conference, subsequent failure to appear on November 3, 

2011 to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for missing the Rule 16 conference, 

and plaintiff’s apparent abandonment of this action; and the parties having had 14 days to object 

to the Report and Recommendation pursuant to L. Civ. R. 72.1(c)(2); and none of the parties

having filed an objection; good cause appearing,

IT IS ON THIS 18th day of November, 2011,

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [D.E. 11] is adopted, and it is further

ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, plaintiff’s 

Complaint is dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 

/s/ Katharine S. Hayden

 Katharine S. Hayden, U.S.D.J.

Case 2:11-cv-03622-KSH -PS Document 13 Filed 11/18/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 67
1 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

Brian J. KARCHER, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

Rich DEPIERRO, et al., 

 Defendant. 

 

 

 Civil No. 11-2911 

 

 

 MEMORANDUM ORDER 

 

THOMPSON, U.S.D.J. 

This matter has come before the Court upon Plaintiff Brian J. Karcher’s Motion for 

Default Judgment against Rich Depierro [docket #18]; and Defendant Richard Depierro having 

opposed the motion and having filed a Cross Motion to Vacate Entry of Default [20], noting that 

he had prepared and served a response to the Complaint, but did not realize he must file the same 

with the Court; and the Court having reviewed and considered the submissions of the parties and 

without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78; and the Court finding that 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedue 55(c), “[f]or good cause shown the court may set 

aside an entry of default”; and the Court further finding that “[i]n determining whether to set 

aside an entry of default, the Court looks at (1) whether the plaintiff will be prejudiced; (2) 

whether the defendant has a meritorious defense; and (3) whether the default was the result of the 

defendant’s culpable conduct” (Malik v. Hannah, Civil No. 05-3901, 2007 WL 2892648, *1 

(D.N.J. Sept. 27, 2007) (citing Chamberlain v. Giampapa, 210 F.3d 154, 164 (3d Cir. 2000))); 

and the Court further finding that “’[a] motion to set aside a default is addressed to the discretion 

of the court [and a]ny doubt should be resolved in favor of setting aside defaults so that cases 

Case 3:11-cv-02911-AET-TJB Document 21 Filed 09/10/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 169
2 

may be decided on their merits’” (Id. (quoting Alopari v. O’Leary, 154 F. Supp. 78, 80-81 

(E.D.Pa. 1957))); and the Court noting that Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to Defendant’s 

motion; and the Court finding that good cause has been shown to set aside the default and that 

vacating the default would not prejudice Plaintiff; and the Court further recognizing the 

procedural impropriety of the motion for default being filed before default had been entered by 

the Clerk pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a); 

IT IS on this 6th day of September, 2012, 

ORDERED that Plaintiff Brian J. Karcher’s Motion for Default Judgment [docket #18] is 

DENIED; and it is 

ORDERED that Defendant Richard Depierro’s Cross Motion to Vacate Entry of Default 

[20] is GRANTED; and it is 

ORDERED that Defendant shall file his Answer, flagged as such on the docket, with the 

Court within 10 days of the date of the filing of this Order; and it is 

ORDERED that upon the filing of the Answer entry of default as to Defendant Richard 

Depierro be vacated and the matter restored to the active case calendar; and it is finally 

ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be mailed to all parties who have not received 

same by ECF. 

 /s/ Anne E. Thompson 

 ANNE E. THOMPSON, U.S.D.J. 

Case 3:11-cv-02911-AET-TJB Document 21 Filed 09/10/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 170
Exhibit 32.2

Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer
of Tidelands Oil and Gas Corporation,  (the  "Company"),  herby certify that, to
the best of my knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
period  ended  December  31,  2005  (the  "Report")   fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the financial  condition  and results of operation of the Company.  A
signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 has been
provided  to the  registrant  and will be retained  by it and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: August 21, 2006.                               /s/ James B. Smith
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     Senior V.P. and CFO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Crim. No. 11-352-02 (FSH)

 

v. : O R D E R

LUIS MANUEL ABREU : 

Defendant. :

This matter having come before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge filed in this matter, which was submitted as a result of this Court having

referred this cause to the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of conducting a plea proceeding under

Fed. R. Crim. P. 11; and the defendant having consented to the Magistrate Judge conducting the

guilty plea proceeding; and the Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as

the transcript of the proceedings on February 7, 2012, and there being no objection to the Report and

Recommendation timely filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b); and the Court finding the Report and

Recommendation is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law; and the Court hereby finding that

the Report and Recommendation should be approved and adopted and the defendant’s guilty plea

accepted,

IT IS ON THIS 22 day of February, 2012, nd

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is

approved and adopted; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant’s guilty plea is accepted and a judgment

of guilt to Count One of the Indictment shall be entered. 

 s/ Faith S. Hochberg 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:11-cr-00352-MCA Document 73 Filed 02/22/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 203
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CARLO E. CEROME, :

Civil Action No. 11-1588(FSH)

Petitioner, :

v. : ORDER TO ANSWER

ERIC HOLDER, et al., :

Respondents. :

Petitioner having filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241;

IT IS on this 26th day of April, 2011,

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve copies of the

Petition, this Order, and all other documents docketed in this

matter upon Respondents by certified mail, return receipt

requested, with all costs of service advanced by the United States;

and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall forward,

electronically or by regular mail, a copy of the Petition, this

Order, and all other documents docketed in this matter to the

Chief, Civil Division, United States Attorney’s Office, 970 Broad

Street, Room 700, Newark, NJ 07102; and it is further

ORDERED that, in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing

Section 2254 Cases, applicable to § 2241 cases through Rule 1(b),

this Court has examined the Petition and determined that dismissal

Case 2:11-cv-01588-FSH Document 3 Filed 04/26/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 24
prior to submission of an answer and the record is not warranted;

and it is further

ORDERED that, within 30 days after the date of entry of this

Order, Respondents shall electronically file a full and complete

answer to said Petition, which responds to the factual and legal

allegations of the Petition paragraph by paragraph; and it is

further

ORDERED that the answer shall state the statutory authority

for Petitioner’s detention, see 28 U.S.C. § 2243; and it is further

ORDERED that Respondents shall raise by way of the answer any

appropriate defenses which Respondents wish to have the Court

consider, including, but not limited to, exhaustion of

administrative remedies, and also including, with respect to the

asserted defenses, relevant legal arguments with citations to

appropriate legal authority; and it is further

ORDERED that Respondents shall electronically file with the

answer certified copies of the administrative record and all other

documents relevant to Petitioner’s claims; and it is further

ORDERED that all exhibits to the Answer must be identified by

a descriptive name in the electronic filing entry, for example:

“Exhibit #1 Transcript of [type of proceeding] held on

XX/XX/XXXX” or 

“Exhibit #2 Opinion entered on XX/XX/XXXX by Judge YYYY”; 

and it is further

2

Case 2:11-cv-01588-FSH Document 3 Filed 04/26/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 25
ORDERED that Petitioner may file and serve a reply in support

of the Petition within 30 days after the answer is filed; and it is

further

ORDERED that, within 7 days after any change in Petitioner’s

custody status, be it release or otherwise, Respondents shall

electronically file a written notice of the same with the Clerk of

the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve this Order on

Petitioner by regular mail.

s/ Faith S. Hochberg 

FAITH S. HOCHBERG

United States District Judge

3

Case 2:11-cv-01588-FSH Document 3 Filed 04/26/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 26
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Kevin K. Moriarty, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Del Taco Income Properties IV;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:  a)
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):  a)
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: March 25, 2005
    
    /s/ Kevin K. MoriartyKevin K. MoriartyDirector, Chairman andChief Executive Officer
1

            FILED IN4th COURT OF APPEALS  SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS7/24/2015 4:12:03 PM    KEITH E. HOTTLE              Clerk

2

3

- Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 5, 2012

p0227 

# Order

March 5, 2012

144075

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 14 4075 COA: 298340 Washtenaw CC: 09-001378-FC WILLIE JAMES HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 20, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.