alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

28. Unemployed persons by reason for unemployment, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity

(Numbers in thousands)

Reason

White Black or African

American Asian Hispanic or Latinoethnicity

2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005

NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYED

 Total unemployed .................................................................. 5,847 5,350 1,729 1,700 277 259 1,342 1,191

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs .......... 3,105 2,681 828 770 139 104 693 585

 On temporary layoff ................................................................ 819 755 129 137 19 14 200 151

 Not on temporary layoff .......................................................... 2,286 1,926 699 634 120 90 493 434

 Permanent job losers ............................................................ 1,744 1,405 484 422 95 70 321 273

 Persons who completed temporary jobs .............................. 542 521 215 212 24 20 172 161

Job leavers ............................................................................... 654 654 142 147 28 35 121 113

Reentrants ................................................................................ 1,638 1,589 590 596 73 92 377 355

New entrants ............................................................................ 450 425 169 186 37 28 152 139

PERCENT DISTRIBUTION

 Total unemployed .................................................................. 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

 Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs ......... 53.1 50.1 47.9 45.3 50.2 40.2 51.6 49.1

 On temporary layoff ............................................................... 14.0 14.1 7.5 8.0 7.0 5.4 14.9 12.7

 Not on temporary layoff ......................................................... 39.1 36.0 40.4 37.3 43.2 34.7 36.7 36.5

 Job leavers .............................................................................. 11.2 12.2 8.2 8.7 10.2 13.6 9.0 9.5

 Reentrants ............................................................................... 28.0 29.7 34.1 35.1 26.2 35.6 28.1 29.8

 New entrants ........................................................................... 7.7 8.0 9.8 11.0 13.4 10.7 11.3 11.6

UNEMPLOYED AS A PERCENT OF THE

 CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE

 Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs ......... 2.6 2.2 5.0 4.5 2.2 1.6 3.6 3.0

 Job leavers .............................................................................. .5 .5 .9 .9 .4 .5 .6 .6

 Reentrants ............................................................................... 1.4 1.3 3.5 3.5 1.2 1.4 2.0 1.8

 New entrants ........................................................................... .4 .3 1.0 1.1 .6 .4 .8 .7

 NOTE: Estimates for the above race groups (white, black or African American, and Asian) do not sum to totals because data are not presented for all races. In

addition, persons whose ethnicity is identified as Hispanic or Latino may be of any race and, therefore, are classified by ethnicity as well as by race. Beginning in

January 2005, data reflect revised population controls used in the household survey.

248
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

KIMBERLEE WILLIAMS, et al.,

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

BASF CATALYSTS, LLC, et al.,

 

Defendants.

HONORABLE JOSE L. LINARES

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-1754 (JLL) (JAD)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify a true and accurate copy of the foregoing attached Motion to Appeal being

served on all counsel for the parties of record listed below on this 25th day of June 2018 date via 

electronic delivery only. 

Eugene F. Assaf, P.C.

Kirkland & Ellis, LLP 

655 15th St., N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20005

eassaf@kirkland.com

Peter A. Farrell, Esq.

Kirkland & Ellis, LLP 

655 15th St., N.W.

Facsimile: (202) 879-5200

pfarrell@kirkland.com

Justin T. Quinn, Esq.

Robinson Miller LLC

One Newark Center, 19th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

jquinn@rwmlegal.com

Attorneys for Defendant, BASF Catalysts, LLC

Kevin H. Marino, Esq.

Marino, Tortorella & Boyle, P.C.

437 Southern Boulevard

Chatham, New Jersey 07928

kmarino@khmarino.com

John A. Boyle, Esq.

Marino, Tortorella & Boyle, P.C.

437 Southern Boulevard

Chatham, New Jersey 07928

jboyle@khmarino.com

Attorneys for Defendant Arthur Dornbusch

Eric Tunis, Esq.

Herold Law, P.A.

25 Independence Boulevard

Warren, New Jersey 07059

etunis@heroldlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant Thomas Halkett

Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 600-17 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 44664
Barry H. Boise, Esquire

Anthony Vale, Esquire

Nina M. Gussack, Esquire 

Pepper Hamilton LLP

3000 Two Logan Square

18th & Arch Streets

Philadelphia, PA 19103

boiseb@pepperlaw.com

valea@pepperlaw.com

gussackn@pepperlaw.com

Angelo A. Stio, III, Esquire

Pepper Hamilton LLP

301 Carnegie Center, Suite 400

Princeton, New Jersey 08543

stioa@pepperlaw.com

Jessica S. Russell, Esquire

Pepper Hamilton LLP 

333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 400

Redwood City, CA 94065

russellj@pepperlaw.com

Attorneys for Cahill Defendants

COHEN PLACITELLA & ROTH PC

/s/ CHRISTOPHER M. PLACITELLA 

_________________________________

CHRISTOPHER M. PLACITELLA

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 600-17 Filed 06/25/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 44665
S06A0170.

#### WINSTEAD v. THE STATE.

(632 SE2d 86)

Decided June 12, 2006.

*Carson & Ruskell, G. Channing Ruskell,*for appellant.

*David L. Cannon, Jr., Solicitor-General, Barry W. Hixson, Assistant Solicitor-General,*for appellee.

SEARS, Chief Justice.

On November 10, 2004, the appellant, Daniel Winstead, pled guilty to driving under the influence. This was Winstead’s second conviction for driving under the influence in five years. In sentencing Winstead, the trial court did not require Winstead to install an ignition interlock device on his vehicles pursuant to the provisions of OCGA §§ 42-8-111 and 42-8-112. Winstead subsequently filed a motion to set aside his sentence, contending that the trial court was required to order him to install an ignition interlock device. The trial court denied Winstead’s motion, and Winstead has now filed this appeal, contending that the trial court erred in not setting aside his sentence. Winstead’s sentence, however, was more lenient to him than permitted under OCGA § 42-8-111. In situations where a defendant has received a sentence that is too lenient under the law, it has been held that a “defendant will not be heard to complain on appeal that he was ‘accorded an unmerited privilege with beneficent results.’ ”1 Accordingly, the trial court in the present case did not err in denying Winstead’s motion to set aside his sentence.2

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

*Woodson v. State,*267 Ga. App. 636, 638 (600 SE2d 717) (2004), *quoting Fortson v. Hopper,*242 Ga. 81, 82 (247 SE2d 875) (1978).

2

 Because we are able to affirm the trial court’s judgment for the foregoing reason, we need not address the constitutional issue that the trial addressed and that formed the basis of jurisdiction in this Court. See *Green v. Green,*263 Ga. 551, 552 (437 SE2d 457) (1993) (This Court will not decide cases “on constitutional issues when other issues are dispositive.”).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andrew Lessie, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 893]

The defendant argues that the Supreme Court erred in admitting testimony from the arresting officer that, prior to trial, he was threatened by two defense witnesses. The defendant contends that the admission of this testimony was improper, as *899there was insufficient circumstantial evidence connecting him to the alleged threat.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not err in determining that there was sufficient circumstantial evidence linking him to the alleged threat to warrant its admission into evidence (see *People v Myrick,*31 AD3d 668, 669 [2006]; *People v Cotto,*222 AD2d 345 [1995]; *People v Pitts,*218 AD2d 715 [1995]). Moreover, the Supreme Court instructed the jury that it was free to believe, or not believe, that the alleged threat had been made and/or that the defendant was linked to the alleged threat (see *People v Myrick,*31 AD3d at 669). Rivera, J.P., Ritter, Garni and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

_________________________ 

Rosemary Clark and Patrick DeAngelis, : 

 

 Plaintiff, : Hon. Joseph H. Rodriguez 

 

 v. : Civil Action No. 10-6725 

 

Bally’s Park Place. Inc., et. al., : Order

 

 Defendants. : 

____________________________ 

This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiff Patrick DeAngelis’ Motion 

for Class Certification [Dkt. No. 48] pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23; and the Court having 

considered the written submissions of the parties, including the supplemental briefing, 

and the Court having considered the arguments presented at the hearing on this motion 

on May 2, 2013; and for the reasons expressed on the record that day, as well as those 

set forth in the Court’s opinion of even date, 

IT IS on this 12th day of March, 2014, hereby 

ORDERED that Plaintiff Patrick DeAngelis’ Motion for Class Certification [Dkt. 

No. 48] pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 is GRANTED. 

 

 s/ Joseph H. Rodriguez 

 Hon Joseph H. Rodriguez, 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:10-cv-06725-JHR-JS Document 66 Filed 03/12/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1125
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 14, 2019

p0813 

# Order

Clerk August 14, 2019

160026 & (10)

In re PETITION OF CHIPPEWA COUNTY

TREASURER FOR FORECLOSURE.

_________________________________________

CHIPPEWA COUNTY TREASURER,

Petitioner

- Appellee,

v SC: 160026

COA: 349188

Chippewa CC: 17

- 014728

- CH

THOMAS O’CONNOR,

Respondent

- Appell ant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The application for leave to appeal the July 22, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals is

considered, and it is DENIED, because we ar e not persuaded that the questions presented

should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED.
John E. Flaherty 

MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP 

Four Gateway Center 

100 Mulberry Street 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

(973) 622-4444 

Errol B. Taylor 

Fredrick M. Zullow 

Anna Brook 

MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY

 & MCCLOY LLP

1 Chase Manhattan Plaza 

New York, New York 10005-1413 

(212) 530-5000 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Orexo AB 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

OREXO AB, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

 

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and 

MYLAN INC., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

:

: 

Honorable Freda L. Wolfson, U.S.D.J. 

Honorable Lois H. Goodman, U.S.M.J. 

Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-03788 (FLW)(LHG) 

NOTICE OF MOTION TO SEAL 

Motion Day: May 20, 2013 

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW-LHG Document 124 Filed 04/25/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 2853
2 

 

TO MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. AND MYLAN INC., AND THEIR 

ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Orexo AB (“Plaintiff”), will move before this 

Court at the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, 402 East State Street, 

Trenton, New Jersey, on May 20, 2013 at 10:00 a.m., before the Honorable Lois H. Goodman, 

United States Magistrate Judge, for entry of an Order, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.3(c), 

permitting the sealing of portions of the Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff Orexo 

AB’s Motion for the Issuance of a Letter of Request to the Central Authority of India for 

Testimony from Subash Chandra Mohanta and P. Murali Krishna, and Exhibits A, C, D, E, and F 

in their entirety, which were electronically filed on April 23, 2013 [D.I. 123]. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Plaintiff will rely upon the Memorandum 

submitted with this Notice of Motion, the Declaration of Sunila Sreepada, the proposed 

redactions to the memorandum, and upon all pleadings and proceedings on file herein. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that a Proposed Order granting Plaintiff’s 

motion is attached. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: April 25, 2013 By: s/John E. Flaherty 

John E. Flaherty 

MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP 

Four Gateway Center 

100 Mulberry Street 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

(973) 622-4444

Errol B. Taylor 

Fredrick M. Zullow 

Anna Brook 

MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY

 & MCCLOY LLP

1 Chase Manhattan Plaza 

New York, New York 10005-1413 

(212) 530-5000 

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW-LHG Document 124 Filed 04/25/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 2854
3 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 The undersigned hereby certifies that true copies of the foregoing Notice of Motion to 

Seal and supporting documents were caused to be served on April 25, 2013 via email and/or the 

ECF system upon all counsel of record. 

 

 By: s/John E. Flaherty 

 John E. Flaherty 

Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW-LHG Document 124 Filed 04/25/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 2855
Case 2:11-cv-00427-JLL -CCC Document 5 Filed 02/18/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 37
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 85 Filed 11/20/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1013
907 A.2d 1007

#### A.A., A.B., A.C., A.D. (BY M.M., HIS NATURAL PARENT), A.E., A.F., AND A.G. (ALL FICTITIOUS INITIALS), INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RICHARD J.CODEY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ACTING GOVERNOR, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PETER C. HARVEY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND JOSEPH R. FUENTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SUPERINTENDENT OF THE NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

September 8, 2006.

Denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1631]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

*Whereas*, CODEZOL, C.D., grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 163, submitted an application to the Board for authority to expand its zone to include an additional site (Site 10) in the Ponce, Puerto Rico area, adjacent to the Ponce Customs and Border Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 58-2008, filed 10/08/08);                

*Whereas*, notice inviting public comment was given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (73 FR 61780, 10/17/08; correction 73 FR 65583, 11/4/08), and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                

*Whereas*, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest;                

*Now, therefore*, the Board hereby orders:                

                    The application to expand FTZ 163 is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, and subject to a sunset provision that would terminate authority for Site 10 on June 30, 2014, if no activity has occurred under FTZ procedures before that date.                          ( print page 34307)    

Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of June 2009.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce  for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:

Andrew McGilvray,

 Executive Secretary,

[FR Doc. E9-16790 Filed 7-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Grace 3, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas A. Dyer,
Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




Dated:  January
      14, 2010
              GRACE
      3, INC.By: /s/ DOUGLAS A. DYERDouglas
      A. DyerPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)(Principal
      Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Baoshinn Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, I, Benny Kan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  November 18, 2008 BAOSHINN CORPORATION By:  /s/ Benny Kan Benny Kan  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Baoshinn Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, I, Sean Webster, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  November 18, 2008 BAOSHINN CORPORATION By:  Sean Webster Sean Webster
-against

11 Cr. 447 (WHW)

JAMES PENDER,

RUSSELL FLUKER,RONALD BASSETT, and

KEITH EUTSEY

Defendants.

This matter having been opened to the Court by Paul J.

Fishman, United States Attorney for the District of New

Jersey, (Sharon Ashe, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing),

and defendants James Pender (Thomas Arnbrosio, Esq.,appearing), Russell Fluker (Anthony J. lacullo, Esq.,

appearing), Ronald Bassett (Ronald Rubinstein, Esq.,

appearing) and Keith Eutsey (John J. O’Reilly, Esq.,appearing) and good cause having been shown, the Court makes

the following findings:

This case is sufficiently complex, due to the nature of

the prosecution, that it is unreasonable to expect adequate

preparation for pretrial proceedings and trial within the

time limits established by Title 18, United States Code,

section 3161; and the ends of justice served by a continuance
ORDERED that:

The trial date in this matter is continued until May 1,

2012, and that the period of time from January 9, 2012

through May 1, 2012 shall be excluded for the purposes of

computing time under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18

U.S.C. section 3161 (h) (8) (A), (h) (8) (B) (ii) and (h) (8)

(iv);

Trial shall commence on May 1, 2012 at 10:00am.

HON. WILLIAM H. WALLSUnited States District Judge

Sharon

Sh

Ashe, AUSA

Thomas Arnbrosio, Esq.

(Attorney for JAMES PENDER)
of the trial date in this matter until Nay 1, 2012 outwei-h

the interest of the public and the defendants in a speedytrial;

WHEREFORE, it is on this /2i clay of December 2011,

ORDERED that:

The trial date in this matter is continued until Kay 1,

2012 and that the period of time from Jajtua.ry 9, 2012through Nay 1. 2012 shall be excl.uded for the purposes of

computing time under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18

1LS.C. section 3161 (h) (8) (A), (h) (8) (B) (ii) and (h) (8)

(iv);

‘rrial shall commence on Nay 1, 2012, at 1;00iu. /

c. ,

-1’- ----‘/

WIU,IAbH. WAILS

United States flstrict Judge

Sharon AgIle 1 AUSAThomas Arflbrosio, Esq.

(Attorney for JAKES PENDER)
Ronald Rubinstein, Esq.

(Attorney for RONALD BASSETT).

John J. O’Reilly Esq.

(Attorney for KEITH EUTSEY)
Ronald Rubinstein, Esq.

(Attorney for RONALD BASSETT)

John 3. O’Reilly, Esq.

(Attorney for KEITH EUTSEY)
Ronald Rubinstein, Esq.

(Attorney for RONALD BASSE)

9tQ4fr

Jo J’Reilly, sq.

7tor y for KE7k EUTSEY)