alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5196

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

115 South Swenson Street in Stamford, Texas, as the ‘‘Gordon Wood 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2004

Mr. STENHOLM (for himself, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. FROST, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. 

HALL, Mr. BELL, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Mr. TURNER of Texas, Mr. GONZALEZ, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. DOGGETT, Mr. 

HENSARLING, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. 

NEUGEBAUER, Mr. EDWARDS, Mr. CARTER, Mr. BURGESS, Ms. EDDIE

BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. REYES, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. 

SANDLIN, and Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 115 South Swenson Street in Stamford, 

Texas, as the ‘‘Gordon Wood Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GORDON WOOD POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 115 South Swenson Street in 
2

•HR 5196 IH 

1 Stamford, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Gordon Wood Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the Gordon Wood Post 

7 Office Building.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 132 (Monday, July 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33405-33406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16500]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Proposed Change to Section IV of the Virginia State 
Technical Guide

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department 
of Agriculture.

ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in the Virginia NRCS 
State Technical Guide for review and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: It has been determined by the NRCS State Conservationist for 
Virginia that changes must be made in the NRCS State Technical Guide 
specifically in practice standards: <greek-i>314, Brush Management; 
<greek-i>382, Fence; <greek-i>646, Shallow Water Development and 
Management; <greek-i>658, Wetland Creation; <greek-i>659, Wetland 
Enhancement; <greek-i>657, Wetland Restoration; and <greek-i>644, 
Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management. These practices will be used to 
plan and install conservation practices on cropland, pastureland, 
woodland, and wildlife land.

DATES: Comments will be received for a 30-day period commencing with 
this date of publication.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John A. Bricker, State 
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 1606 
Santa Rosa Road, Suite 209, Richmond, Virginia 23229-5014; Telephone 
number (804) 287-1691; Fax number (804) 287-1737. Copies of the 
practice standards will be made available upon written request to the 
address shown above or on the Virginia

[[Page 33406]]

NRCS Web site: http://www.va.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/draftstandards.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after 
enactment of the law to NRCS State technical guides used to carry out 
highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made 
available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days, the NRCS 
in Virginia will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. 
Following that period, a determination will be made by the NRCS in 
Virginia regarding disposition of those comments and a final 
determination of change will be made to the subject standards.

    Dated: July 1, 2009.
W. Ray Dorsett,
Assistant State Conservationist for Operations, Natural Resources 
Conservation Service, Richmond, Virginia.
[FR Doc. E9-16500 Filed 7-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ivanhoe Energy Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a  15(f) and 15d  15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a.)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c.)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andd.)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a.)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ Robert M. FriedlandRobert M. FriedlandChief Executive Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LADONNA EARL and WILLIAM EARL, her husband,

Appellants,

v.

DOMINIC ADDARIO and YVONNE ADDARIO,

Appellees.

No. 4D2023-0578

[January 25, 2024]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth 

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; G. Joseph Curley, Judge; L.T. Case 

No. 502021CA013632.

Gregory A. Kummerlen of Kummerlen Law, PLLC, Jupiter, for 

appellants.

Bruce M. Trybus of Cooney Trybus Kwavnick Peets, Fort Lauderdale, 

for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on Strategy and Budget, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR Part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of meetings for the transaction of National Science Board business and other matters specified, as follows:

# Date and Time:

 Friday, July 24, 2009 at 1 p.m.

# Subject Matter: 

Discussion of future NSF budgets.

# Status: 

Closed.

                        This meeting will be held by teleconference originating at the National Science Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Please refer to the National Science Board Web site (                        *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb*) for information or schedule updates, or contact: Jennie Moehlmann, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7000.                    

Ann Ferrante,

Writer-Editor.

[FR Doc. E9-16861 Filed 7-13-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
CME-2012.12.31 10K Ex 10.2








Exhibit 10.2







Name:         
Department:      
Division:     


Congratulations!  We are pleased to provide you with an equity grant under the CME Group Inc. Amended and Restated Omnibus Stock Plan (the “Plan”).  This equity grant is in recognition of the anticipated positive impact you will make toward the future success of CME Group.  Your equity grant may enable you to acquire ownership in CME Group Inc., which is a means for you to share in the success of the company while creating shareholder value.  Certain terms of your equity grant follow:




Restricted Stock Terms
		
	Restricted Stock:
	You have been granted [ó] restricted shares of Class A common stock, $.01 par value, of CME Group Inc. 


Grant Date:        [ó]    
		
	Vesting Schedule:
	Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, 25 percent of the restricted stock grant shall become vested on each anniversary of the grant date, with 100 percent of the restricted stock grant becoming vested on the fourth anniversary of the grant date.  


		
	Dividends:
	Dividends paid on unvested restricted shares will be accrued and paid out via E*Trade according to the vesting schedule.


Your equity grant has an economic value of [ó]. The economic value was used to calculate the number of restricted shares granted, using the closing stock price on the grant date.
To be eligible to receive this grant, you must have entered into a Confidentiality, Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement with CME Group Inc.  In addition to the terms stated in this grant letter, your equity grant shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.  All documents relating to the Plan, including the cover letter, grant letter, Plan Document, Prospectus, Frequently Asked Questions, 83b Election Memo (for U.S. employees only) and Beneficiary Form, are available online by logging on to your E*TRADE account at www.etrade.com/stockplans or by calling E*TRADE at 800-838-0908 (+1-650-599-0125 outside the U.S.). A copy of the current CME Group Form 10-K can be found at: http://investor.cmegroup.com/investor-relations/financials.cfm. Please complete your W-9 Form (or W-8BEN Form if outside the U.S.) upon activation of your E*TRADE account and submit your completed Beneficiary Designation Form to CME Group’s Compensation Department, 20 S. Wacker, 2N, Chicago, IL 60606.
By accepting this equity grant, you hereby agree to the terms and conditions of the Plan, which are subject to change at any time.  In addition, you acknowledge and agree that you are receiving this grant pursuant to CME Group’s Annual Grant Program, which is in place at the discretion of CME Group.  Accordingly, your receipt of this grant and your eligibility for any future grants are subject to the continued existence of the Annual Grant Program.
PROB 12B

(7/93)
” United States District Court
for
District of New Jersey
Request for Modifying the Conditions or Term of Supervision
with Consent of the Offender
Name of Offender: Rufus Ward Cr.: 11-00378-001

PACTS Number: 61007
Name of Sentencing Judicial Officer: Honorable Joseph E. Irenas
Date of Original Sentence: 10-14-2011
Original Offense: Theft of Government Property
Original Sentence: Five years probation

Type of Supervision: Probation Date Supervision Commenced: 10-14-2011

PETITIONING THE COURT

[XxX] To modify the conditions of supervision as follows. The modification of following special
condition(s):

OTHER CONDITION
Removal of self-payment of location monitoring fees.
CAUSE

Waive location monitoring fees in favor of restitution. The U.S. Probation Office will assume payment
of these fees.

Respegtfylly submitted,

C417 ae

y: Kévin M. Villa
(= Senior U.S. Probation Officer
Date: November 15, 2011
THE COURT ORDERS: A
he Modification of Conditions as Noted Above i
] The Extension of Supervision as Noted Above
L ] No Action

7,
[ | Other Sie

/ Signature of Judicial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

KIMBERLEE WILLIAMS, et al.

 

 Plaintiffs,

 vs.

BASF CATALYSTS LLC, et al.

 

 Defendants.

No. 2:11-cv-01754 (JAD)

CIVIL ACTION

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

CLASS COUNSEL’S PETITION FOR APPROVAL

AND GRANT OF AWARDS OF CLASS COUNSEL’S

ATTORNEYS’ FEES, CLASS COUNSEL’S 

REIMBURSEMENT OF LITIGATION EXPENSES, AND 

CLASS REPRESENTATIVE SERVICE AWARDS

Class Counsel having filed a petition (“Petition”) for (i) an award of 

attorney’s fees and reimbursement of costs and litigation expenses for Class 

Counsel’s work to date in this litigation; and (ii) incentive awards to the Class 

Representatives for their invaluable contributions they made to the achievement of 

the Settlement, pursuant to Rule 23(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the

Court’s Preliminary Approval Order (ECF No. 623), and Section 13 of the Class 

Action Settlement Agreement, and the matter having come on consideration by the 

Court;

Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 628-3 Filed 10/20/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 49312
NOW, on this _____ day of _________________, 202_, upon consideration 

of the Petition, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED, that the Petition 

be, and hereby is, GRANTED; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows:

1. The Court awards $22,500,000 in attorney’s fees to Class Counsel. 

2. The Court awards Class Counsel reimbursement of costs and litigation

expenses of $1,038,300.27.

3. All attorney’s fees and reimbursement of costs and litigation expenses 

shall be paid by Defendants BASF Catalysts, LLC (“BASF”) and Cahill, 

Gordon & Reindel LLC (“Cahill”), pursuant to Section 13.1 of the Class 

Action Settlement Agreement.

4. Class Representatives Kimberlee Williams, Gayle Williams, Marilyn L. 

Holley, Sheila Ware, Donnette Wengerd, and Roseanne Chernick shall 

each be paid incentive awards of $50,000, pursuant to Section 13.2 of the 

Class Action Settlement Agreement.

BY THE COURT

____________________________

Hon. Joseph A. Dickson

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 628-3 Filed 10/20/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 49313
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00784

- CV

Alyssa Lee Brewer , Appellant

v.

James Patrick Esquenazi , Appellee

FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

NO. 292,406

- E

, STEVEN J. DUSKIE , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Alyssa Lee Brewer has filed an unopposed moti on to dismiss this

appeal. We g rant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)

.

__________________________________________

Chari L . Kelly , Ju s tice

Before Justices Baker, Kelly, and S mith

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: January 17, 202 3
Exhibit
32.2




Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of
Title 18 of the United States Code




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NTR Acquisition Co. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, William E. Hantke, Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






/s/
      William E. HantkeWilliam
      E. HantkePrincipal
      Financial OfficerMay
      13, 2008




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has
been provided to NTR Acquisition Co. and will be retained by NTR Acquisition Co.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Forgotten  Investments Company,
Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending  December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Daniel
L.  Hodges,  President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


March 31, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SNV_Exhibit 10.34_12.31.2012






Exhibit 10.34


SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
Annual Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers




Set forth below are the base salaries for persons identified as “named executive officers” of Synovus Financial Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2012, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:


	
					
	Name
	Title
	Base Salary

	 
	 
	 

	Kessel D. Stelling
	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
	$
	897,000
	


	Thomas J. Prescott
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	407,000
	


	Allen J. Gula, Jr.
	Executive Vice President and Chief Operations Officer
	405,000
	


	Mark G. Holladay
	Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer
	331,000
	


	Samuel F. Hatcher
	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
	343,000
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GONGYI YANG,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-73546

BIA No. A099-740-705

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 16, 2013** 

Before: CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Gongyi Yang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding

of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

FILED

APR 22 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-73546

substantial evidence and will uphold the agency’s decision unless the evidence

compels a contrary conclusion. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th

Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review. 

Yang concedes on appeal that he did not suffer past persecution, but argues

he will be persecuted in the future because he mailed religious materials to his

parents. The record does not compel the conclusion that Yang established a wellfounded fear of persecution. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th Cir.

2003) (possibility of future persecution too speculative); Prasad v. INS, 47 F.3d

336, 340 (9th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, Yang’s asylum claim fails.

Because Yang failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed

to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Zehatye, 453

F.3d at 1190.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Criminal No. 11-459 (DMC)
Vv.
BLAS ERNERS ESPINAL CABRERA, : ORDER

a/k/a “Hermano”

This matter having come before the Court on the
application of the United States Attorney for the District of New
Jersey (by Mary E. Toscano, Special Assistant United States
Attorney), for an order unsealing the docket sheet, the
Indictment, and all related papers in the above-captioned matter,
and good and sufficient cause having been shown,

IT IS on this 22 5° day of October, 2011,

ORDERED that the Sealing Order previously entered in
the above-captioned matter is no longer in effect; and it is
further

ORDERED that the docket sheet, the Indictment, and all

related papers in the above-captioned matter be UNSEALED.

HON. DENNIS M.4CAVANAUGH
United State istrict Judge
Let the Writ Issue.

The United States of America to Warden ofthe HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL

CENTER:

WE COMMAND YOU that you have the body of

LAWRENCE BROWN (SBI #754992B),

now confined at the HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, brought before the United States District Court, the Hon. Susan D. Wigenton, U.S.D.J., in the Martin Luther King,

Jr. Federal Building & Courthouse, 50 Walnut Street, Newark, New Jersey 07102 on Monday,

March 4, 2013, at 10:30 a.m., in civilian clothes, so that the Detainee may appear in the abovecaptioned matter.

Immediately upon completion ofthe proceedings, the Detainee will be returned to said place of confinement in safe and secure conduct.

WITNESS the Honorable Susan D. Wigenton United States District Judge Newark, New Jersey.

/ ‘7

DATED WILLIAM T WALSH

Clerk ofthe U S District Court

for the District ofNew Jersey

Per

________________________________________

Deputy Clerk

WRIT OF