alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 134 (Wednesday, July 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34321-34322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16726]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13480-000]

FFP Project 69, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application 
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and 
Competing Applications

July 8, 2009.
    On May 22, 2009, FFP Project 69, LLC filed an application for a 
preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, 
proposing to study the feasibility of the Breeze Point Hydrokinetic 
Project, to be located on the Mississippi River, in Concordia Parish, 
Louisiana and Wilkinson County, Mississippi.
    The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant 
the permit holder priority to file a license application during the 
permit term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder 
to perform any land disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands 
or waters owned by others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed Breeze Point Hydrokinetic Project consists of: (1) 
4,942 proposed 40 kilowatt Free Flow generating units having a total 
installed capacity of 197.68 megawatts; (2) a 6.8-mile-long, 69 
kilovolt transmission line; and (3) appurtenant facilities. The 
proposed Breeze Point Hydrokinetic Project would have an average annual 
generation of 866 gigawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Ramya Swaminathan, Vice President of 
Development, Free Flow Power Corporation, 33 Commercial Street, 
Gloucester, MA 01930; phone: (978) 226-1531.
    FERC Contact: Kim Carter, 202-502-6486.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the

[[Page 34322]]

Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project, including a copy of 
the application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of 
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. 
Enter the docket number (P-13480) in the docket number field to access 
the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-16726 Filed 7-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**


**ACTING
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF**


**DENARII
      RESOURCES INC.**


**FORM
      10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2007**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Chris
      Lori, am the Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer of
      Denarii Resources Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering
      this certificate in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
      the
      Company for the three month period ended June 30, 2007 and filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
      the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                  October 24, 2007
            By:
            /s/ *Chris
              Lori*CHRIS
              LORIChief
                Executive Officer, President, acting Chief Financial Officer, acting
                Principal Accounting Officer and Director
Case 3:10-cr-00720-PGS Document 62 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 53
Case 3:10-cr-00720-PGS Document 62 Filed 11/15/10 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 54
Case 3:10-cr-00720-PGS Document 62 Filed 11/15/10 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 55
Case 3:10-cr-00720-PGS Document 62 Filed 11/15/10 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 56
Case 3:10-cr-00720-PGS Document 62 Filed 11/15/10 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 57
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

DAVID POLIFRONI, 

 Plaintiff 

 v. 

COMMERCIAL RECOVERY 

SYSTEMS, INC., 

 Defendant 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 2:11-cv-3362-WHW-CCC 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

TO THE CLERK: 

 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff 

voluntarily dismisses his Complaint with prejudice. 

Dated: January 7, 2013 BY:/s/Amy L. Bennecoff 

Amy L. Bennecoff, Esquire 

Attorney ID # AB 0891 

Kimmel & Silverman, P.C 

1930 E. Marlton Pike, Suite Q29 

Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08003 

Phone: (856)429-8334 

Facsimile: (856) 216-7344 

Email: abennecoff@creditlaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Case 2:11-cv-03362-WHW-SCM Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 73
<PAGE>

I, Friedrich von Bohlen und Halbach, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of LION bioscience
Aktiengesellschaft;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.   The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90
days prior to the filing date of this annual report based on such evaluation;
and

          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting.

     5.   The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal controls
over financial report.

Date: September 29, 2003


By: /s/ Friedrich von Bohlen und Halbach
   -------------------------------------

Name: Dr. Friedrich von Bohlen und Halbach

Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### Robert Doherty, Respondent, v Singh Ajaib et al., Appellants.

[853 NYS2d 908]

*801The defendants met their prima facie burden by showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The report of his treating physician was without any probative value since it is clear that in coming to his conclusions therein he relied upon the unsworn medical reports of others *(see Malave v Basikov,*45 AD3d 539 [2007]; *Verette v Zia,*44 AD3d 747 [2007]; *Furrs v Griffith,*43 AD3d 389 [2007]; *Friedman v U-Haul Truck Rental,*216 AD2d 266, 267 [1995]).

Further, the plaintiffs self-serving affidavit was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether he sustained a serious injury as a result of the subject accident *(see Rashid v Estevez,*47 AD3d 786 [2008]; *Roman v Fast Lane Car Serv., Inc.,*46 AD3d 535 [2007]; *Verette v Zia,*44 AD3d 747 [2007]; *Duke v Saurelis,*41 AD3d 770 [2007]). Moreover, neither the plaintiff nor his treating physician adequately explained the discontinuance of the plaintiffs treatment in October 2002 *(see Pommells v Perez, 4*NY3d 566 [2005]; *Wei-San Hsu v Briscoe Protective Sys., Inc.,*43 AD3d 916 [2007]; *Bestman v Seymour,*41 AD3d 629 [2007]; *Albano v Onolfo,*36 AD3d 728 [2007]). Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Dillon, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
| Name of Subsidiary                               | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Formation |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| IELA Colombia Inc.                               | Barbados                                   |
| IELA Mexico Pte. Ltd.                            | Singapore                                  |
| IELA Singapore Pte. Ltd                          | Singapore                                  |
| Ivanhoe Energy (Latin America) Inc.              | British Virgin Islands                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy (Middle East) Inc.                | British Virgin Islands                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy Advisory Inc.                     | British Virgin Islands                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy Canada Inc.                       | Alberta                                    |
| Ivanhoe Energy Canadian Holdings Inc.            | Alberta                                    |
| Ivanhoe Energy Colombia Inc.                     | Barbados                                   |
| Ivanhoe Energy Ecuador Inc.                      | British Columbia                           |
| Ivanhoe Energy Holdings Inc.                     | Nevada                                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy HTL (USA) Inc.                    | Nevada                                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy HTL Inc.                          | Nevada                                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy International Inc.                | British Virgin Islands                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy International Ventures Inc.       | British Virgin Islands                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy Latin America Inc.                | British Columbia                           |
| Ivanhoe Energy MENA Inc.                         | British Columbia                           |
| Ivanhoe Energy Mexico IELA, S.A. de C.V.         | Mexico                                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy Mexico Inc.                       | British Columbia                           |
| Ivanhoe Energy Mongolia Inc.                     | Alberta                                    |
| Ivanhoe Energy Petroleum Projects Inc.           | Nevada                                     |
| Ivanhoe Energy Services Mexico IELA S.A. de C.V. | Mexico                                     |
| Ivanhoe HTL Petroleum Ltd                        | Nevada                                     |
| Panasian Energy Ltd.                             | Nevis                                      |
| Shaman LLC                                       | Mongolia                                   |
| Sunwing Energy Ltd.                              | Bermuda                                    |
| Sunwing Holding Corporation                      | Barbados                                   |
| Sunwing Management Limited                       | Hong Kong                                  |
| Sunwing Zitong Energy Ltd.                       | British Virgin Islands                     |

----
CME-2012.12.31 10K Ex 10.1




Exhibit 10.1
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
CME GROUP INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED 
OMNIBUS STOCK PLAN
(Effective as of May 23, 2012)


This First Amendment (“First Amendment”) amends the CME Group Inc. Amended and Restated Omnibus Stock Plan (effective as of May 23, 2012 and hereinafter, the “Plan”).  All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to those terms under the Plan.  
		
	1.
	Pursuant to Section 11.1 of the Plan, Section 8.2.3 of the Plan is hereby restated in its entirety, as follows:


8.2.3    Settlement of Vested Performance Share Awards.  The Award Agreement pertaining to a Performance Share Award (i) shall specify whether such Award may be settled in Shares (including Shares of Restricted Stock) or cash or a combination thereof and (ii) may specify whether the holder thereof shall be entitled to receive, on a deferred basis, Dividend Equivalent Rights. If a Performance Share Award is settled in Shares of Restricted Stock, a certificate or certificates or book entry record representing such Restricted Stock shall be issued, and the Participant shall have such rights of a stockholder of the Company as determined pursuant to Section 7.6 and 10.13. Prior to the settlement of a Performance Share Award in Shares, including Restricted Stock, the Participant shall have no rights as a stockholder of the Company with respect to the Shares subject to such Award.  Unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, Performance Share Awards are intended to qualify as short term deferrals for purposes of Section 409A of the Code.  Accordingly, settlement of a Performance Share Award shall occur no later than March 15 of the year following the year in which the Performance Goals applicable to such Performance Share Awards are attained, as determined by the Compensation Committee prior to such date, or are deemed to have been attained pursuant to Section 8.3.1.  Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, to the extent necessary to avoid adverse tax consequences to a Participant who is a “specified employee” under Section 409A of the Code, settlement of a Performance Share Award shall not be made until after the expiration of the six-month period commencing on the Participant’s Termination of Service.
		
	1.
	The terms of the Plan, as amended hereby, are confirmed in all respects and remain in full force and effect.


		
	2.
	This First Amendment is effective as of December 5, 2012.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CME Group Inc. has caused this First Amendment to the Plan to be executed by its duly authorized officer on the 19th day of December, 2012.
By:   /s/ Hilda Harris Piell
Its:  Senior Managing Director & Chief Human Resources Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Snowdon Resources Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Elden Schorn, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   

Dated this 9th day of September, 2008.

ELDEN SCHORNElden SchornChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

























---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

________________________________

:

RODOLFO GODOY, :

: Civil Action No. 11-3754 (NLH)

Petitioner, :

:

v. : O R D E R 

:

WARDEN DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, :

:

Respondent. :

________________________________:

This matter having come before the Court on Petitioner’s

submission of a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241; and for the reasons expressed in the Opinion

issued this same day;

IT IS on this 5th day of July , 2012;

ORDERED that the petition is hereby denied; and it is

further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall close this file.

 s/ Noel L. Hillman 

NOEL L. HILLMAN

 United States District Judge

At Camden, New Jersey

Case 1:11-cv-03754-NLH Document 9 Filed 07/05/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 115
Case 2:11-cv-03495-DMC Document 2 Filed 08/08/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 14
Case 2:11-cv-03495-DMC Document 2 Filed 08/08/11 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 15
Case 2:11-cv-03495-DMC Document 2 Filed 08/08/11 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 16
Case 2:11-cv-03495-DMC Document 2 Filed 08/08/11 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 17
Case 2:11-cv-03495-DMC Document 2 Filed 08/08/11 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 18
Case 2:11-cr-00366-JLL Document 27 Filed 08/17/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 186
Case 2:11-cr-00366-JLL Document 27 Filed 08/17/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 187
Case 2:11-cr-00366-JLL Document 27 Filed 08/17/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 188
EXHIBIT 10.3


Fee Settlement Agreement
  Recitals
  AGREEMENT entered into this 28th day of January, 2014, by and between Seafarer Exploration Corp (the "Company"), and ClearTrust, LLC ("Transfer Agent").
  WHEREAS, the Transfer Agent has incurred various reimbursable expenses resulting directly from acting as transfer agent for the Company, and the Company is obligated to reimburse the Transfer Agent for said expenses.
  NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Transfer Agent hereby agree to settle the amount owed to the Transfer Agent with shares of restricted stock. The parties hereto agree as follows:
  1. Legal Expenses Owed
  The transfer agent has incurred reimbursable expenses and invoiced the Company as detailed in the table below:
  Date of Invoice to Company
Invoice Number
Amount
Reason for Invoice9/4/13
2733
$918
Legal expenses related to "Eldred vs. Seafarer" case10/4/13
2822
$540
Legal expenses related to "Eldred vs. Seafarer" case10/23/13
2833
$184.45
Legal expenses related to "Eldred vs. Seafarer" case10/28/13
2838
$2779
Legal expenses related to "Eldred vs. Seafarer" case1/9/14
3124
$3261.48
Legal expenses related to "Eldred vs. Seafarer" caseTOTAL
$7,682.93
   2.       Issuance of Stock
  The Company shall reimburse the Transfer Agent cashless with a non-refundable payment of 768,293 shares of restricted common stock of the Company. The Transfer Agent may sell the shares in the public marketplace in reliance on Rule 144 ornegotiate the sale of the shares in a privately negotiated transaction. Regardless the manner of sale, the Transfer Agent must apply all proceeds gained by the sale of the shares to the open invoices listed in the table above.
  Should the Transfer Agent realize less proceeds than the total due in the table above, the Transfer Agent may request up to 700,000 additional shares of stock or a cash payment to
 cover the difference in the amount owed.
  5. Severability
  In the event that any one or more provisions herein shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof.
  1
  6. Miscellaneous
  This Agreement (i) constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and shall supersede ail prior understandings and agreements as to such subject matter; (ii) may be amended or modified only by a writing executed by the party against whom enforcement is sought; (iii) shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the respective heirs, administrators, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto; and (iv) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Florida.
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Fee Settlement Agreement as of the date and year first above written.
    
 
    SEAFARER EXPLOTION CORP.






2
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Homeland EnergySolutions, LLC (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Walter W. Wendland, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   |                 /s/  Walter W. Wendland |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Walter  W. Wendland,                                                                                                    |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer                                                                                                |
|   | Dated:                                                                                                                  |                 August  13, 2010 |

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

David Polifroni, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 v. 

Commercial Recovery Systems, Inc., 

 Defendant. 

: 

: 

: 

: ORDER

: 

: Civ. No. 11-03362 (WHW) 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

Walls, Senior District Judge 

For the reasons set for the in the accompanying Opinion and good cause therefor, 

It is, on this 24th day of July, 2012, 

ORDERED that the plaintiff David Polifroni’s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 8) 

is DENIED; and 

ORDERED that the deadline for serving the Summons and Complaint on defendant 

Commercial Recovery Systems pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) shall be 

extended to September 14, 2012; and 

ORDERED that the plaintiff David Polifroni shall either properly effect service on 

defendant Commercial Recovery Systems or show cause before this Court no later than 

September 14, 2012 why the Court should not dismiss this action for failure to properly effect 

service of the Summons and Complaint on defendant Commercial Recovery Systems. 

/s/ William H. Walls 

United States Senior District Judge

Case 2:11-cv-03362-WHW-MCA Document 10 Filed 07/24/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 65