alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34004-34005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16556]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1339-000]


Grand Ridge Energy II LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

July 7, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Grand Ridge Energy II LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is July 27, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed

[[Page 34005]]

docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#87c1c2d5c4c8e9ebeee9e2d4f2f7f7e8f5f3c7e1e2f5e4a9e0e8f1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5b1d1e091814353732353e082e2b2b34292f1b3d3e2938753c342d">[email protected]</span></a> or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, 
call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-16556 Filed 7-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NEE-12.31.2012-Ex 10.G






Exhibit 10(g)




	
						
	Appendix A2
Last Revised On: December 1, 2012

	Name
	Company
	Pre-4/1/1997 Participant
	Class A “Bonus SERP” Status
	Double Basic Credits
	Double Transition Credits

	FRANCIS, SHAUN J. *
	NextEra Energy, Inc
	 
	X1
	X1
	 

	KELLIHER, JOSEPH T. *
	NextEra Energy, Inc
	 
	X1
	X1
	 

	MCGRATH, ROBERT L. 2*
	NextEra Energy, Inc
	 
	X1
	X1
	X1

	RODRIGUEZ, ANTONIO *
	NextEra Energy, Inc
	X
	 
	 
	 

	SIEVING, CHARLES E. *
	NextEra Energy, Inc
	 
	X1
	X1
	 

	SILAGY, ERIC E.
	Florida Power & Light Company
	 
	X1
	X1
	 

	YEAGER, WILLIAM L.
	NextEra Energy, Inc
	 
	X1
	X1
	 

	CUTLER, PAUL I. *
	NextEra Energy, Inc
	 
	X1
	 
	 

	FROGGATT, CHRIS N. *
	NextEra Energy, Inc
	 
	X1
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	

1The Compensation Committee has expressly identified these items and acknowledged that they are subject to Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.  In particular, these items include: (i) the additional deferred compensation provided by the designation of certain officers as Class A Executives, effective on or after January 1, 2006; and (ii) the additional deferred compensation set forth in SERP Amendment #4 to the Prior Plan (meaning amounts deferred by certain senior officers specified by the Compensation Committee who became participants in the SERP on or after April 1, 1997 at the rate of two times the basic credit and, to the extent applicable, the transition credit under the cash balance formula in the SERP for their pensionable earnings on or after January 1, 2006).  Importantly, nothing in Amendment #4 to the Prior Plan, the SERP, Compensation Committee resolutions, or any other document shall be construed as subjecting to Code Section 409A any deferrals made under the SERP prior to January 1, 2005, except as expressly noted herein.
2     Due to material modification of the SERP benefit pursuant to Executive Retention Employment Agreement entered into after December 31, 2004, no amount of the SERP benefit for Mr. McGrath is eligible for grandfathered treatment under Code Section 409A.


*Executive Officer of NextEra Energy, Inc.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 17, 2016

No. 04-16-00002-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.C.W.,

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015EM504960

Honorable Nick Catoe Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s amended brief was filed on June 17, 2016. This court provided appellee with 

a copy of appellant’s amended brief, and appellee’s brief is due September 7, 2016.

Therefore, appellant’s August 11, 2016 letter requesting an extension of time to file his 

amended brief is DENIED as MOOT.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of August, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Madeline Scaltro, Respondent, v New York City Transit Authority, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[852 NYS2d 844]

The defendant New York City Transit Authority made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Trainer v City of New York,*41 AD3d 202 [2007]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Fisher, J.P., Miller, McCarthy and Chambers, JJ., concur.
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

27. Unemployed persons by reason for unemployment, sex, and age

(Numbers in thousands)

Reason

Total,

16 years

and over

Men,

20 years

and over

Women,

20 years

and over

Both sexes,

16 to 19

years

1998 1999 1998 1999 1998 1999 1998 1999

NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYED

 Total unemployed .................................................................. 6,210 5,880 2,580 2,433 2,424 2,285 1,205 1,162

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs .......... 2,822 2,622 1,588 1,459 1,053 990 181 173

 On temporary layoff ................................................................ 866 848 483 475 322 310 61 63

 Not on temporary layoff .......................................................... 1,957 1,774 1,105 984 731 680 120 110

 Permanent job losers ............................................................ 1,353 1,225 763 685 527 481 64 59

 Persons who completed temporary jobs .............................. 603 549 343 299 204 199 56 51

Job leavers ............................................................................... 734 783 318 336 330 333 86 114

Reentrants ................................................................................ 2,132 2,005 611 592 944 866 577 547

New entrants ............................................................................ 520 469 63 46 97 96 361 328

PERCENT DISTRIBUTION

 Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs ......... 45.5 44.6 61.5 60.0 43.4 43.3 15.0 14.9

 On temporary layoff ............................................................... 13.9 14.4 18.7 19.5 13.3 13.6 5.1 5.4

 Not on temporary layoff ......................................................... 31.5 30.2 42.8 40.4 30.2 29.7 10.0 9.5

 Job leavers .............................................................................. 11.8 13.3 12.3 13.8 13.6 14.6 7.2 9.8

 Reentrants ............................................................................... 34.3 34.1 23.7 24.3 39.0 37.9 47.9 47.1

 New entrants ........................................................................... 8.4 8.0 2.4 1.9 4.0 4.2 30.0 28.2

UNEMPLOYED AS A PERCENT OF THE

 CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE

 Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs ......... 2.1 1.9 2.3 2.1 1.8 1.6 2.2 2.1

 Job leavers .............................................................................. .5 .6 .5 .5 .6 .5 1.0 1.4

 Reentrants ............................................................................... 1.5 1.4 .9 .8 1.6 1.4 7.0 6.6

 New entrants ........................................................................... .4 .3 .1 .1 .2 .2 4.4 3.9

 NOTE: Beginning in January 1999, data reflect revised population controls used in the household survey.

203
1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SXC Health Solutions Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: November 5, 2009By:
    /s/ Jeffrey ParkJEFFREY PARKChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 21.1



|                                                         |  |                              
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Subsidiary Name                                          |  | State/Country of Organization
|Genesys Software Systems, Inc.                           |  | Massachusetts                
|ICR Limited, L.C.                                        |  | Massachusetts                
|ICR International Limited                                |  | United Kingdom               
|Salary.com Limited (formerly known as Infobasis Limited) |  | United Kingdom               
|Salary.com Securities Corporation                        |  | Massachusetts                
|SDC China Ltd.                                           |  | China                        
|Salary.com Jamaica Limited                               |  | Jamaica
Case 2:10-mj-03588-MF Document 2 Filed 06/10/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 20, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40227

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE MIRANDA-LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-02-CR-589-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Jose Miranda-Lopez appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Miranda-Lopez complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced

pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. He

argues that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. 

Miranda-Lopez thus contends that his sentence should not exceed
No. 03-40227

-2-

the maximum terms of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(a). 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Miranda-Lopez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7558

RALPH FRANKLIN FREDRICK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THEODIS BECK, Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior

District Judge. (1:07-cv-00303-GCM)

Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 28, 2008

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ralph Franklin Fredrick, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ralph Franklin Fredrick seeks to appeal the district

court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as

successive. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Fredrick has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny

Fredrick’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of extension for public comment period.

# SUMMARY:

The Forest Service is extending the public comment period for the Travel Management Draft Environmental Impact Statements for the Klamath National Forest for an addition 15 days to August 4, 2009. The original notice called for comments to be submitted by July 20, 2009 (75 FR 27034, June 5, 2009).

# DATES:

Comments must be received in writing by August 4, 2009.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Send comments electronically to                         *comments-pacificsouthwestklamath@fs.fed.us.*                         Comments also may be submitted by mail to the Klamath National Forest,                         *Attn:*                         Jan Ford, 1312 Fairlane Road, Yreka, CA 96097, or by fax to (530) 841 4571. Comment sent via e-mail should use the subject line “Klamath NF Travel Management EIS.”                    

Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names and addresses of those who comment, will become part of the public record for this proposed action.

                        Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered; however, anonymous comments may limit the respondent's ability to participate in subsequent administrative review or judicial review. The public may inspect comments received on this                               ( print page 34304)                            project at the Klamath National 1312 Fairlane Road, Yreka, CA 96097 on business days between 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jan Ford, Klamath National Forest, 1312 Fairlane Road, Yreka, CA 96097;                         *jaford@fs.fed.us,*                         or (530) 841-4483.                    

Dated: July 6, 2009.

Patricia A. Grantham,

Forest Supervisor, Klamath National Forest.

[FR Doc. E9-16700 Filed 7-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Marc T. Ray, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of MedPro Safety Products,  Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not  misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information  included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and  for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and  procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed  under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within  those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being  prepared; and

      (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the  registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this  report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and  procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such  evaluation; and 

      (d) Disclosed in this report any change  in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred  during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth  fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control  over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based  on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board  of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting  which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to  record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the  registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

| Date: June 24, 2008 | /s/ Marc T. Ray                                 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                |                                                 |
|                | Marc T. Ray                                     |
|                | Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer |

29

----