alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of EGPI Firecreek, Inc. (the "Registrant") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Dennis R. Alexander,
President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:





(1)
  The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.





By:
                      /s/ Dennis R. AlexanderDennis
      R. AlexanderCEO
      and Chief Financial
Officer




Date:
March 23, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the
Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Case 1:11-cr-00159-HB Document 40 Filed 07/15/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 139
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Sonus Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, Hassan M. Ahmed, Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: March 13, 2006 |     | /s/ HASSAN M.  AHMED                                                                            |
|---------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |     | Hassan M. Ahmed                                                                                 |
|                      | * * | *Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board  of Directors (Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ZZLL Information Technology, Inc. . (the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2016, I, Sean Webster, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endingSeptember 30, 2016, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2016, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 17, 2016

ZZLL Information Technology, Inc.

By: /s/
Sean Webster

Sean Webster
Case 2:11-cv-03362-WHW-SCM Document 1 Filed 06/10/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 1
Case 2:11-cv-03362-WHW-SCM Document 1 Filed 06/10/11 Page 2 of 10 PageID: 2
Case 2:11-cv-03362-WHW-SCM Document 1 Filed 06/10/11 Page 3 of 10 PageID: 3
Case 2:11-cv-03362-WHW-SCM Document 1 Filed 06/10/11 Page 4 of 10 PageID: 4
Case 2:11-cv-03362-WHW-SCM Document 1 Filed 06/10/11 Page 5 of 10 PageID: 5
Case 2:11-cv-03362-WHW-SCM Document 1 Filed 06/10/11 Page 6 of 10 PageID: 6
Case 2:11-cv-03362-WHW-SCM Document 1 Filed 06/10/11 Page 7 of 10 PageID: 7
Case 2:11-cv-03362-WHW-SCM Document 1 Filed 06/10/11 Page 8 of 10 PageID: 8
Case 2:11-cv-03362-WHW-SCM Document 1 Filed 06/10/11 Page 9 of 10 PageID: 9
Case 2:11-cv-03362-WHW-SCM Document 1 Filed 06/10/11 Page 10 of 10 PageID: 10
PX 2012 10-K EX10.02c FIRST AMENDMENT TO PRAXAIR, INC. SEVERANCE COMPENSATION AGREEMENT


	
		
	
	Praxair, Inc.
39 Old Ridgebury Road
Danbury, CT  06810-5113








Praxair, Inc. and Subsidiaries
EXHIBIT 10.02c


First Amendment to 
Praxair, Inc.
Severance Compensation Agreement
December 11, 2012


«First_Name» «Last_Name»
«Address_Line_11»
«Address_Line_21»
«City1», «State_Province_1»  «Zip_Code1»


Dear «First_Name»:
This letter serves as an amendment to the Severance Compensation Agreement between you and Praxair, Inc. dated as of (insert date) (“Agreement”).  The Agreement, as modified by this amendment, shall be effective as of December 31, 2012.  Kindly sign this amendment where indicated below to acknowledge your acceptance of its terms and return the original to Marge Turkenkopf by no later than December 31, 2012.


Subsection 2e is amended to add the following sentences at the end thereof:
In no event may you, directly or indirectly, designate the calendar year of any payment to be made under this Agreement or otherwise which constitutes a “deferral of compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code.  In addition, to the extent payments under this Agreement that are contingent upon your execution of the general release described above constitute deferred compensation for purposes of Section 409A and your execution period for the general release shall commence in one tax year and end in the subsequent tax year, such payments under this Agreement shall be made solely in the subsequent tax year.
    
Sincerely,
PRAXAIR, INC.            
                                                                           
By:  /s/ Steve Angel                        
Steve Angel


Title:  Chairman, President & CEO




Agreed to this __ day of __________, 2012


    
(Signature)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 135 (Thursday, July 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16948]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1843-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]


Alaska; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Alaska (FEMA-1843-DR), dated June 11, 2009, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: May 31, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective May 31, 2009.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)


W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-16948 Filed 7-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### Loren W. MAY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. T.C. Outlaw, Warden, FCI-Forrest City; Ronald Smith, Safety Manager, FCI-Forrest City, Defendants-Appellees Geraldo Maldonado, Jr.; Harrell Watts; Does, Defendants.

No. 12-3036.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: April 2, 2013.

Filed: April 5, 2013.

Loren W. May, Sr., Forrest City, AR, pro se.

Richard M. Pence, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Loren May, an inmate of the Federal Correctional Institution in Forrest City, Arkansas, appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment to defendants Warden T.C. Outlaw and Safety Manager Ronald Smith. May asserted that they violated his Eighth Amendment rights by knowingly subjecting him to an environment containing “black mold,” which caused him a number of illnesses. Because undisputed evidence shows that Outlaw and Smith took meaningful, affirmative steps to reduce the amount of mold present at the prison facility, we conclude that neither defendant was deliberately indifferent to May’s medical needs or health *598risks. *See Nelson v. Corr. Med. Servs.,*583 F.3d 522, 528-29 (8th Cir.2009) (prison official violates Eighth Amendment if official knows of and disregards serious medical need or substantial risk to inmate’s health or safety).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
Case 2:11-cr-00405-KSH Document 15 Filed 03/21/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 30
Case 2:11-cr-00405-KSH Document 15 Filed 03/21/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 31
Exhibit 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-148663, Form S-8 No. 333-142963, Form S-8 No. 333-119616, Form S-8 No. 333-160535 and Form S-8 No. 333-168123) of GigaMedia Limited of our report dated
April 30, 2012, on the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting of GigaMedia Limited, which appears on page F-1 and F-2 in this annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ GHP HORWATH, P.C.
|                     
|Denver, Colorado     
|April 30, 2012
Case 3:11-mj-02509-DEA   Document 14   Filed 09/20/11   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 75

Case 3:11-mj-02509-DEA   Document 14   Filed 09/20/11   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 76
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY (JURISDICTION)                                OWNERSHIP
---------------------------------                             ---------------
<S>                                                           <C>
IVANHOE ENERGY (USA) INC. (Nevada)..........................  100%
  Digital Petrophysics Resources, Inc. (Nevada).............  100% (indirect)
  Consultants Royalty Management, Inc. (California).........  100% (indirect)

IVANHOE ENERGY HOLDINGS INC. (Nevada).......................  100%
  Ivanhoe Energy Royalty Inc. (Nevada)......................  100% (indirect)

IVANHOE ENERGY INTERNATIONAL VENTURES INC.
  (British Virgin Islands)..................................  100%

DIATOM PETROLEUM, INC. (Nevada).............................  100%

IVANHOE ENERGY INTERNATIONAL INC. (British Virgin
  Islands)..................................................  100%
  Kuban Petroleum (Cyprus) Limited (Cyprus).................  100% (indirect)
  Cedar Valley Petroleum (Cyprus) Limited (Cyprus)..........  100% (indirect)

SUNWING ENERGY INC. (Yukon).................................  100%
  Sunwing Holding Corporation (Barbados)....................  100% (indirect)
  Sunwing Energy Ltd. (Bermuda).............................  100% (indirect)
  Sunwing Management Limited (Hong Kong)....................  100% (indirect)
  Pan-China Resources Ltd. (British Virgin Islands).........  100% (indirect)
  Dagang Resources Ltd. (British Virgin Islands)............  100% (indirect)

IVANHOE ENERGY ADVISORY INC. (British Virgin Islands).......  100%
</TABLE>

                                       E-63
Exhibit 32(ii)

Certification of the Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The
undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-K filed by American Community Bancshares, Inc. (the Issuer) for the year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates
and for the periods presented therein.



|                     |  |                                     |  |                                                 
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | American Community Bancshares, Inc.
|                     |  |                                    
|Date: March 22, 2007 |  | By:                                 |  | /s/ Dan R. Ellis, Jr.                           
|                     |  |                                     |  | Dan R. Ellis, Jr.                               
|                     |  |                                     |  | Chief Financial and Principal Accounting Officer
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Exploration Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas Brady,
President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of
Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and






(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




















/s/
Thomas Brady


Thomas
Brady


Chief
Executive Officer






July 15,
2010




















CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Exploration Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas Brady, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and






(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




















/s/
Thomas Brady


Thomas
Brady


Chief
Financial Officer






July 15,
2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Hon. Katharine S. Hayden

v. : Crim. No. 10-436 (KSH)

YANEIRA PERDOMO : O R D E R

This matter having come before the Court on the petition of the

United States Probation Office for a hearing regarding the failure of

defendant Yaneira Perdomo to comply with certain conditions of

supervised release imposed on May 17, 2011, Ronnell L. Wilson,

Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing for the Government, and Carol

Gillen, Assistant Federal Public Defender, appearing for the

defendant; and the defendant having waived the preliminary hearing and

having entered a guilty plea and been adjudged guilty on September 10,

2012 to having violated Condition No. 10 of the Standard Conditions of

Supervised Release, which required that she refrain from excessive use

of alcohol and shall not purchase, possess, use, distribute, or

administer any narcotic or controlled substance or any paraphernalia

related to such substances, except as prescribed by a physician; and

for good cause shown;

IT IS on this 10 day of September, 2012, th

ORDERED that the term of supervised release is hereby revoked;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant is hereby committed to

the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned

for a term of 4 months, with credit given for all time the defendant

has been incarcerated since her arrest on August 22, 2012;

Case 2:10-cr-00436-KSH Document 39 Filed 09/10/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 86
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon release from imprisonment,

no term of supervised release shall be imposed upon the

defendant; 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Violation 2 of the Violation

Report dated August 21, 2012 is hereby dismissed; and

IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Bureau of Prisons assign the

defendant to a facility near the defendant’s home address. 

 /s/ Katharine S. Hayden 

 KATHARINE S. HAYDEN

 United States District Judge

Case 2:10-cr-00436-KSH Document 39 Filed 09/10/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 87
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Stephen Wong, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Michael Shahbazian, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|      |  |                                                  
|----- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|By:   |  | /s/ Stephen Wong                                 
|      |  | Stephen Wong                                     
|      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|      | 
|Date: |  | May 1, 2006                                      
|      | 
|By:   |  | /s/ Michael Shahbazian                           
|      |  | Michael Shahbazian                               
|      |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|      | 
|Date: |  | May 1, 2006
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

____________________________________ 

:

ROGET LERNER, :

:

Plaintiff, : Civil Action No. 11-3297 (SRC)

:

v. :

: OPINION

HARVEY SCHEFREN et al., : 

:

Defendants. :

____________________________________:

CHESLER, U.S.D.J.

This matter comes before the Court pursuant to the Order To Show Cause of

June 15, 2011 directing Plaintiff Roget Lerner to show cause in writing why this action should

not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, this

Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for

lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

On June 8, 2011, Plaintiff, represented by counsel, filed a Complaint which asserted

subject matter jurisdiction based on the presence of a federal question, contending that

Defendants had violated Plaintiff’s rights under the United States Constitution. This Court

examined the Complaint and, unable to discern in the Complaint any claims for any violations of

any rights under the United States Constitution, Ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the action

should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 

Plaintiff responded to the Order to Show Cause by submitting an Amended Complaint

with a brief cover letter.

Case 2:11-cv-03297-SRC-MAS Document 5 Filed 07/06/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 249
The Amended Complaint no longer asserts federal question jurisdiction, nor does it

contend that Defendants have violated Plaintiff’s Constitutional rights. Instead, it asserts that

this Court’s jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship. (Am. Compl. 2.) The Amended

Complaint alleges that Plaintiff is a citizen of the State of New York, while two Defendants are

citizens of the State of New York, and two Defendants are citizens of the State of New Jersey. 

(Id. at 2.) 

Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity: the citizenship of every plaintiff must

be different from the citizenship of every defendant. Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis, 519 U.S. 61, 68

(1996). This Court finds that the Complaint does not allege complete diversity – since Plaintiff

and at least one Defendant are alleged to be citizens of New York – and does not support subject

matter jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. 

Under Third Circuit law, this Court has an obligation to satisfy itself that it has subject

matter jurisdiction over a case and to address the issue sua sponte. This Court finds no basis in 1

the Complaint to support subject matter jurisdiction. This Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction

to hear this case, and it will be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). 

 s/ Stanley R. Chesler 

Stanley R. Chesler, U.S.D.J.

Dated: July 6, 2011

 Desi's Pizza, Inc. v. City of Wilkes-Barre, 321 F.3d 411, 420 (3d Cir.2003) (citing 1

Bracken v. Matgouranis, 296 F.3d 160, 162 (3d Cir.2002)).

2

Case 2:11-cv-03297-SRC-MAS Document 5 Filed 07/06/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 250