alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CLYDE & CO US LLP 

200 Campus Drive 

Suite 300 

Florham Park, N.J. 07932-0950 

(973) 210-6700 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Ramada Worldwide Inc., f/k/a Ramada Franchise Systems, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

CASE CLOSED 

RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC., formerly 

known as RAMADA FRANCHISE 

SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02889 (CCC)(JAD 

Plaintiff, 

V. 

SHIV A CORPORATION, a Georgia 

Corporation; SHILP AN PATEL, an 

individual; NILESH PATEL, an individual; 

and PIN AKIN PATEL, an individual, 

Defendants. 

FINAL JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT 

This matter having been opened to the Court by plaintiff, Ramada Worldwide Inc., 

formerly known as Ramada Franchise Systems, Inc. ("RWI"), by its attorneys, Clyde & Co US 

LLP, seeking the entry of Final Judgment by Default against defendants; Shiva Corporation, Shilpan 

Patel, Nilesh Patel, and Pinakin Patel (collectively, the "Defendants"), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 

55(b)(2); and it appearing that the Complaint in this matter was filed on May 19, 2011, seeking 

damages as a result of the breach of a license agreement between RWI and Shiva Corporation, and 

service of a copy of the Summons and Complaint having been effectuated with respect to defendant 

Nilesh Patel by personally serving him in Tampa, Florida on June 24, 2011; and service of a copy of 

the Summons and Complaint having been effectuated with respect to defendants Shiva Corporation, 

Shilpan Patel, and Pinakin Patel by serving them via certified and regular mail on July 29, 2011; and 

Case 2:11-cv-02889-CCC -JAD Document 12 Filed 02/29/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 237
it appearing that default was duly noted by the Clerk of the Court against defendants Nilesh Patel 

and Pinakin Patel on August 26, 2011 for their failure to plead or otherwise defend in this action; 

and it appearing that default was duly noted by the Clerk of the Court against defendants Shiva 

Corporation and Shilpan Patel on October 25, 2011 for their failure to plead or otherwise defend in 

this action; and the Court having reviewed the papers; and good cause having been shown: 

IT IS on this 2... ):( day of Feb , 2012, 

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that RWI have judgment against 

Defendants, jointly and severally, in the total amount of $132,948.38, comprised of the following: 

a) $28,569.14 for Recurring Fees (principal plus prejudgment interest); and 

b) $98,128.00 for liquidated damages (principal plus prejudgment interest); and 

c) $6,251.24 for attorneys' fees and costs. 

CLAIRE C. CECCHI, U.S.D.J. 

Case 2:11-cv-02889-CCC -JAD Document 12 Filed 02/29/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 238
LITE DEPALMA GREENBERG, LLC

Allyn Z. Lite 

Michael E. Patunas 

Mayra V. Tarantino 

Two Gateway Center, 12th Floor 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

Telephone: (973) 623-3000 

Facsimile: (973) 877-3872 

alite@litedepalma.com 

mpatunas@litedepalma.com 

mtarantino@litedepalma.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Hanmi USA, Inc., 

Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 

Hanmi Fine Chemical Co., Ltd., and Hanmi 

Holdings Co., Ltd. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

ASTRAZENECA AB, AKTIEBOLAGET 

HÄSSLE, ASTRAZENECA LP, KBI INC., 

and KBI-E INC., 

 Plaintiffs and 

 Counterclaim Defendants, 

 v. 

HANMI USA, INC., HANMI 

PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., HANMI 

FINE CHEMICAL CO., LTD, and HANMI 

HOLDINGS CO., LTD., 

 Defendants and 

 Counterclaim Plaintiffs. 

 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00760-JAP-TJB 

DECLARATION OF RENITA S. RATHINAM IN SUPPORT OF 

DEFENDANTS’ REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT NOS. 1-5 

Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB Document 170 Filed 12/30/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 6448
1 

I, Renita S. Rathinam, state and declare as follows: 

1. I am an attorney at law in the District of Columbia and an associate of Sughrue 

Mion, PLLC, attorneys for Defendants Hanmi USA, Inc., Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 

Hanmi Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. and Hanmi Holdings Co., Ltd. (collectively “Hanmi”). 

2. I submit this declaration in support of Hanmi’s Reply Briefs in Support of 

Motions for Summary Judgment Nos. 1-5 (D.I. 97-119) ("Reply Briefs"). 

3. True and accurate copies of the exhibits listed in the following table are being 

filed in support of Hanmi’s Reply Briefs. 

Exhibit No. Description 

1 Correspondence between J. Scherling and R. Rothman re Hanmi request for 

deposition of AstraZeneca's summary judgment opposition declarants 

2 Excerpts of 12/6/11 Deposition Transcript of Stephen G. Davies, Ph.D 

3 U.S. Patent No. 6,143,771 

4 U.S. Patent No. 6,225,287 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed this 30th day of December 2011. 

 _____________________________________ 

 Renita S. Rathinam 

Case 3:11-cv-00760-JAP-TJB Document 170 Filed 12/30/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 6449
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF
SURRENDER DATE

: D.C. No. 11-199

ROBERTO TORRES

This matter having come before the Court on the application
of defendant, Roberto Torres, (by John H. Yauch, Assistant
Federal Public Defender) for an Order extending the date by
which defendant must surrender to serve his custodial sentence
imposed in this matter, and the United States ( by Jacob Elberg,
Assistant U.S. Attorney) having gensented thereto, and for good
cause shown;

IT IS on this tk, C_ day of| 2011, HEREBY ORDERED:

1. That the defendant, Roberto Torres, is hereby ordered to

self surrender to serve his prison term,on February 8, 2012.

|

consented to:
Exhibit 31.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer





Certification Pursuant to Section 302


of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Brian E. Stewart, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.




Date: April 29, 2011





/s/ BRIAN E. STEWARTBrian E. StewartChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 20, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41456 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EDUARDO GARCIA-CAVAZOS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-199-ALL

-------------------- Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Eduardo Garcia-Cavazos challenges his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Garcia-Cavazos’s argument that his prior burglary conviction in Texas does not qualify as a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) has been rejected by this court. See United States v. Garcia-Mendez , 420 F.3d 454, 456-57 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 1398 (2006).No. 05-41456 -2- Garcia-Cavazos’s argument that this court did not properly apply the categorical analysis of Taylor v. United States , 495 U.S. 575 (1990), is tantamount to arguing that Garcia-Mendez was wrongly decided. Garcia-Mendez resolved the issue raised in this case; one panel of this court may not ignore the precedent set by a prior panel. United States v. Ruiz , 180 F.3d 675, 676 (5th Cir. 1999). Garcia-Cavazos also argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). His constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Garcia-Cavazos contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi , we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Garcia-Cavazos properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for review by the Supreme Court.
AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 

:

RAYMOND BLOW, :

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, et

al, :

:

Defendants. :

 :

Civil No. 11-2128 (SRC)

ORDER

CHESLER, District Judge 

Plaintiff has filed an application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) to proceed in forma

pauperis. Based on Plaintiff’s affidavit of poverty, the Court finds that Plaintiff qualifies for in

forma pauperis status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 

IT IS therefore on this 10 day of May, 2011, th

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall file the Complaint without prepayment of the filing fee;

and it is further

Case 2:11-cv-02128-SRC-MAS Document 2 Filed 05/10/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 45
ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), the Clerk shall issue summonses and

the United States Marshal shall serve the summons and a copy of the Complaint and this Order

on Defendant, with all costs of service advanced by the United States.

 s/ Stanley R. Chesler 

STANLEY R. CHESLER, U.S.D.J.

2

Case 2:11-cv-02128-SRC-MAS Document 2 Filed 05/10/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 46
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Graham, Jr., Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 765]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J.), rendered April 8, 2005, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

After a thorough inquiry, the court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea *(see People v Frederick,*45 NY2d 520 [1978]). The court did not violate defendant’s right to conflict-free counsel. Although defendant made a number of attacks on his counsel’s performance, none of these claims had any substance. In addition to a meritless coercion claim, defendant made complaints about his counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness that simply reflected defendant’s misconceptions about various procedural aspects of his case. Under these circumstances, there was no conflict of interest requiring the court to appoint new counsel *(see e.g. People v Cruz,*309 AD2d 508 [2003], *lv denied*1 NY3d 570 [2003]; *People v Senghor,*248 AD2d 299 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 905 [1998]; *see also Hines v Miller,*318 F3d 157, 162-164 [2003], *cert denied*538 US 1040*427[2003]). Concur—Tom, J.E, Marlow, Sullivan, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
      ( print page 31457)    
*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Fellowships in Language and Communication.                    

*Date:*                         July 6, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         3 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Chicago, 151 East Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL 60601.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dana Jeffrey Plude, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3176, MSC 7848, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-435-2309.                         *pluded@csr.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 22, 2009.

Anna Snouffer,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-15584 Filed 6-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CAMDEN VICINAGE

CITY SELECT AUTO SALES, INC., a )

New Jersey corporation, individually and )

as the representative of a class of similarly )

situated persons, )

) No.: 1:11-CV-02658-JBS -KMW

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

DAVID RANDAL ASSOCIATES, INC. )

And RAYMOND MILEY III, )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF RENEWED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law in support of its motion,

Plaintiffs shall move before Honorable Jerome B. Simandle, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

and the Local Rules of the United States District Court, for an Order certifying a class in this matter.

Sherman, Silverstein, Kohl,

Rose, and Podolsky

By: s/ Alan C. Milstein

Alan C. Milstein, Esquire

308 Harper Dr., Ste. 200

Moorestown, NJ 08057

Counsel for: Plaintiff, CITY SELECT AUTO

SALES, INC., Individually and as the

representative of a class of similarly-situated persons

Tel: 856-662-0700 Fax: 856-488-4744

Tod A. Lewis

Bock & Hatch, LLC

134 N. La Salle St., Ste. 1000

Chicago, IL 60602

Telephone: 312-658-5500

Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 61 Filed 02/01/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 2200
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Charlie Lee, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of
Pure Pharmaceuticals Corp. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
      period ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                

Date: May 18, 2010

/s/ Charlie LeeCharlie Lee
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl Delmas FULLER, a.k.a. Dale Fuller, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-11396

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 6, 2012.

Emily M. Smachetti, Wifredo A. Ferrer, Lisa A. Hirseh, Kathleen Mary Salyer, Anne Ruth Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, Ellen L. Cohen, Emalyn Web-ber, U.S. Attorney’s Office, West Palm Beach, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gail M. Stage, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Michael Caruso, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before WILSON, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

*832PER CURIAM:

Carl Fuller appeals his sentence of 60 months of imprisonment following his plea of guilty to mail fraud. 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Fuller challenges the enhancement of his sentence for using sophisticated means and the reasonableness of his sentence. We affirm.

The district court did not clearly err by enhancing Fuller’s sentence for using sophisticated means to conceal his fraud. The Sentencing Guidelines provide for a two-level enhancement if the offense in question “involved sophisticated means,” which the commentary defines as “especially intricate offense conduct pertaining to the execution or concealment of the offense” and concealing wrongdoing through “fictitious entities [and] corporate shells.” United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2B1.1(b)(10)(C) *&*cmt. n. 8(B) (Nov.2011). Fuller used a shell corporation and a fake identity to collect almost $8 million in premiums ostensibly to provide worker’s compensation insurance for employees of National Employer Services. After Fuller deposited the premium payments into a company bank account, he tunneled most of the money into accounts that he, his wife, or a friend controlled. To conceal his fraud, Fuller issued to National Employer Services certificates purporting to be proof of insurance and paid $437,852 in worker’s compensation claims.

The district court also did not abuse its discretion by imposing a sentence within the advisory guidelines range. Fuller defrauded a corporation, stole millions of dollars, and deprived employees of insurance coverage required by law to fund a luxurious lifestyle for himself. In turn, National Employer Services was forced to terminate employees and reduce the salaries of its remaining workers. Later, Fuller made false statements to authorities about his involvement in and income derived from his fraud. In the light of the seriousness and extent of Fuller’s fraud, the district court reasonably determined that a sentence of 60 months of imprisonment would best serve the statutory purposes for sentencing. 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Fuller’s sentence is reasonable.

We AFFIRM Fuller’s sentence.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER OFDENARII RESOURCES INC.FORM 10-Q FOR
THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED September 30, 2009 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Stuart Carnie, am the Chief Executive Officer and acting
Chief Financial Officer of Denarii Resources Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the nine month period ended September 30,
2009 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly
Report").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the
best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|Date: November 23, 2009 | By: | /s/ Stuart Carnie                         
|----------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                        |     | Stuart Carnie                             
|                        |     | Chief Executive Officer, President, acting
|                        |     | Chief Financial Officer, acting Principal 
|                        |     | Accounting Officer and Director           

---