alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Scurlock, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 64]—

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J.), rendered March 31, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 3V2 to 7 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant’s and his codefendant’s recent and exclusive possession of the proceeds of the burglary, only a few hundred yards from the break-in, provided the jury with a proper basis from which to reasonably infer defendant’s guilt *(see People v Baskerville,*60 NY2d 374, 382 [1983]; *Knickerbocker v People,*43 NY 177, 181 [1870]; *People v Sim, 53*AD2d 992, 993 [1976], *affd*44 NY2d 758 [1978]). Although the precise time of the burglary could not be ascertained, the evidence supports the conclusion that it occurred shortly before defendant and codefendant were found with the proceeds. Moreover, defendant had a bleeding gash on his leg, which was consistent with the broken window at the burglarized store. Furthermore, there was nothing to support an inference that defendant and the codefendant merely found property that had been stolen and discarded by someone else *(compare People v Moore,*291 AD2d 336 [2002]).

The court properly denied defendant’s request to submit to the jury the issue of the voluntariness of his statements to po*367lice *(see People v Graham,*55 NY2d 144 [1982]; CPL 710.70 [3]). *“A*Trial Judge is required to charge on voluntariness only if an issue has been raised *at the trial*by a proper objection, and evidence sufficient to raise a factual dispute has been adduced either by direct or cross-examination” *(People v Cefaro,*23 NY2d 283, 288-289 [1968]; *see also People v Silvagnoli,*251 AD2d 76 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 882 [1998]; *People v Taylor,*135 AD2d 202 [1988], *lv denied*71 NY2d 1034 [1988]). The question of voluntariness, including any issues relating to the administration of *Miranda*warnings, was never litigated at trial.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.E, Saxe, Friedman, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF


DENARII RESOURCES INC.


FORM 10-Q/A FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED March 31, 2010


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Dr. Stewart Jackson, am the Chief Executive Officer of Denarii Resources Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: November 01, 2010,
By:
/s/ Dr.. Stewart JacksonDr. Stewart JacksonChief Executive Officer, President Secretary,

and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Lolo and Kootenai National Forests' Sanders County Resource Advisory Committee will meet on July 16 at 7 p.m. in Thompson Falls, Montana for a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

# DATES:

July 16, 2009.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will he held at the Thompson Falls Courthouse, 1111 Main Street, Thompson Falls, MT 59873.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Randy Hojem, Designated Federal Official (DFO), District Ranger, Plains Ranger District, Lolo National Forest at (406) 826-3821.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda topics include recommendations on new RAC project proposals, reviewing progress on current projects, and receiving public comment, If the meeting location is changed, notice will be posted in the local newspapers, including the Clark Fork Valley Press, and Sanders County Ledger.

Dated: June 24, 2009.

 Randy Hojem,

DFO, Plains Ranger District, Lolo National Forest.

[FR Doc. E9-15844 Filed 7-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE M
AO 245 S (Rev. 04/98) Sheet 1 - Judgment in a Criminal Case 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

District of New Jersey 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. Case Number 3:03-M-9590 

KURT HAAS 

Defendant. 

JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE 

(For Offenses Committed On or After November 1,1987) 

The defendant, KURT HAAS, was represented by Ronald L Horan, Esq .. 

On motion of the United States the court has dismissed Open Container Alcohol In Motor Vehicle (P254678). 

The defendant pled guilty to Driving While Intoxicated and Driving While Suspended on August 27,2003. Accordingly, the 

defendant is adjudged guilty of such count(s), involving the following offense(s): 

Violation 

Title & Section Nature of Offense Date of Offense Number(s) 

36 CFR 4.23a Driving While Intoxicated May 24, 2003 P254676 

NJSA 39:3-40 Driving While Suspended May 24,2003 P254677 

As pronounced on August 27,2003, the defendant is sentenced as provided on page 2 of this Judgment. The sentence 

is imposed pursuant to the SentenCing Reform Act of 1984. 

It is ordered that the fine and special assessment are waived because of the defendant's inability to pay. 

The defendant's driving privileges are hereby suspended for 120 months consecutive to any current suspension. 

It is further ordered that the defendant shall notify the United States Attorney for this district within 30 days of any change 

of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs, and special assessments imposed by this Judgment are fully 

paid. 

Signed this the 16th day of September, 2003. 

Defendant's SSN: 000-00, 

Defendant's Date of Birth:' 

Defendant's address: 500 North Boulevard, South Belmar, NJ 07719 

As of August 27,2003 the Defendant was in the Monmouth County Correctional Institute. 

Case 2:03-mj-09590-ARM Document 4 Filed 08/27/03 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 7
AD 245 S (Rev. 4/98)(NJ Rev. 2.0) Sheet 2 - Imprisonment 

Judgment--Page 2 of 2 

Defendant: KURT HAAS 

Case Number: 3:03-M-9590 

IMPRISONMENT 

As to Driving While Intoxicated, the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons 

to be imprisoned for a term of 180 days consecutive to any sentence the defendant is currently serving in the State court system. 

As to Driving While Suspended, the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons 

to be imprisoned for a term of 90 days consecutive to the 180 days imposed on Driving While Intoxicated and any sentence the 

defendant is currently serving in the State court system. 

The defendant shall remain in custody pending service of sentence. 

RETURN 

I have executed this Judgment as follows: 

Defendant delivered on ___________to _________________ 

at _________________________" with a certified copy of this Judgment. 

United States Marshal 

By ________________ 

Deputy Marshal 

Case 2:03-mj-09590-ARM Document 4 Filed 08/27/03 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 8
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15097]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Translating Research to Protect Health Through 
Health Promotion, Prevention, and Preparedness, Panel B, Funding 
Opportunity Announcement (FOA) CD09-001, Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 12 p.m.-3 p.m., July 23, 2009 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of ``Translating Research To 
Protect Health Through Health Promotion, Prevention, and 
Preparedness, Panel B, FOA CD09-001, initial review.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Hylan Shoob, PhD, 
Scientific Review Administrator, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., 
Mailstop D72, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone (404) 639-4793.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: June 18, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-15097 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA z ORDER FOR RETURN OF
vs. DEPOSIT FOR BAIL
; [CR -(BA

ERVIS GJONI RECOG. NEW 1969
Case No. DNJX209MJ353401

: DNJX211CR000182

It appearing to the Court that the above-named defendant
was held in bail by the United States District Court for the District
of New Jersey for his appearance before this Court, and that the sum
of Ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) was deposited in the registry of
this Court as security for the said recognizance; and it further
appearing that the purposes of said recognizance have been fulfilled
and the said recognizance has been duly canceled of record, it is, on
this 21% day of Bt 2012

ORDERED that the sum of Ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) so
deposited as aforesaid be returned to Amy Robertson, 21-71 24 Street

Basement, Asotira, New York 11105 the surety of said recognizance.

U
JEROME B. SIMANDLE, CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Splinternet Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of the undersigned’s knowledge, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      May 14, 2009
                By:
                /s/ John T. GrippoJohn
      T. Grippo, Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
Exhibit 10.18.1

 



 

March 30, 2012

 

Mr. Charles C. Stewart

1405 Haddon Place

Hoover, AL 35226

 

Dear Chuck,

 

We are pleased that you have accepted the position of Senior Vice President, Project Development of Walter Energy, Inc. (“Walter” or the “Company”), effective as of March 19, 2012. The attached schedules outline the compensation and benefits and terms and conditions of your employment.

 

As the Senior Vice President, Project Development, you will have such duties, responsibilities and authorities as the Chief Executive Officer of Walter (the “CEO”) determines are appropriate for your position. You will report to the CEO.

 

It is agreed and understood that this letter agreement (including the schedules and exhibits attached hereto) (collectively, the “Agreement”) and the other agreements referred to in this Agreement shall constitute our entire agreement with respect to the subject matter hereof and shall supersede all prior agreements, discussions, understandings and proposals (written or oral) relating to your employment with the Company and its affiliates. This Agreement may only be amended or modified by a written agreement executed by you and Walter (or any of its respective successors) and will be interpreted under and in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware without regard to conflicts of laws.

 

This letter serves as an amendment to the previously executed agreement dated June 10, 2011. Effective March 19, 2012, your annual base salary is increased to $373,860, which includes an adjustment to offset the discontinuation of your auto allowance. Your Long-Term Incentive Plan target will be valued at 100% of base salary. All other terms of employment remain unchanged.

 

This Agreement may be executed by fax or pdf and in any number of counterparts, all of which, when taken together, will constitute one and the same instrument.

 

Chuck, we are delighted that you have accepted the position and I look Forward to working with you. If the terms contained within this Agreement are acceptable, please sign and return a copy to me.

 

Best regards,

 

	
/s/ Walter J. Scheller, III
    	
 
    	
4-13-12
    
	
Walter J. Scheller, III
    	
 
    	
Date
    
	
Chief Executive Officer
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Walter Energy, Inc.
    	
 
    	
 
    


 











 

ACCEPTANCE

 

I have read the Agreement, have been advised to consult with counsel of my choice concerning the same, and I fully understand the same. I approve and accept the terms set forth in the Agreement as governing my employment relationship with Walter.

 

	
/s/ Charles C. Stewart
    	
 
    	
4/16/12
    
	
Charles C. Stewart 
    	
 
    	
Date
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

I, Shaw Hong, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Annual Report of OmniVision Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of OmniVision Technologies, Inc. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OmniVision
Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by OmniVision Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated:
June 29, 2011

By:

/s/ SHAW HONGShaw HongChief Executive Officer, President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


I,
Anson Chan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of OmniVision
Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
OmniVision Technologies, Inc. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OmniVision Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by
OmniVision Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated:
June 29, 2011

By:

/s/ ANSON CHANAnson ChanChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Energy  Producers,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Larry W. Trapp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ Larry W. Trapp
-------------------
Larry W. Trapp
Chief Financial Officer
Date:  April 14, 2003
FUSCO & MACALUSO, L.L.C.

150 Passaic Avenue

P.O. Box 838

Passaic, New Jersey 07055

(973) 779-1163

Attorneys for Defendant, Rory Donadio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ORDER

Plaintiff,

v.

: Case No.: 2:11-cr-00194-DMC

RORY DONADIO

Defendant.

This matter having been opened to the Court upon the application of Defendant Rory

Donadio (“Defendant”) (Anthony J. Fusco, Jr., Esq., appearing) to modify the Order setting

conditions of his release, dated March 31, 2011, to allow Defendant to travel throughout

California, Florida, Texas, and Massachusetts as required by his employer, Legal Finance; and

the United States of America, by Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the District of New

Jersey (Jenny Kramer, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing) and Pretrial Services (Emily Rosado,

Pretrial Services Officer, appearing) having consented to a modification of Defendant’s bail to

allow the travel at issue; and for good cause shown,

IT IS on this 2cday of March, 2012,

ORDERED that, Defendant may travel freely from New York to California, Florida,

Texas, and Massachusetts as necessary upon request from his employer, and it is further;

Case 2:11-cr-00194-DMC Document 17 Filed 04/04/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 59
ORDERED that, Defendant will not be required to produce a separate order for each

travel period as long as travel is restricted to California, Florida, Texas, and Massachusetts, and

it is further;

ORDERED that, Defendant shall communicate via telephone with AUSA Jenny Kramer

and Pretrial Service Officer Emily Rosado before traveling to advise them ofthe travel dates, and

it is further;

ORDERED that, Defendant shall continue to provide Pretrial Service Officer Emily

Rosado with work logs, itineraries, and hotel accommodations prior to leaving for any trip and it

is further;

ORDERED that Defendant shall communicate with Defendant’s Pretrial Service Officer

every Monday and Wednesday while out of the District of New Jersey, as directed by

Defendant’s Pretrial Services Officer, and it is further,

ORDERED that all other applicable prior conditions of bail shall remain in place.

HONORABLE DENNIS AVANAUGH

United States District Judge

Case 2:11-cr-00194-DMC Document 17 Filed 04/04/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 60
Case 2:11-cr-00132-DRD Document 9 Filed 06/07/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 22
#### SIMMONS CO. v. CANTOR et al.

Civil Action No. 2504.

District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

Aug. 23, 1943.

*198Edward A. Lawrence, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Green & McCallister, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendants.

GIBSON, District Judge.

After complaint filed, counsel for defendant filed a consolidated motion to dismiss, a motion to dismiss and motion for a bill of particulars. Plaintiff, on the day fixed for argument upon the motion, moved for permission to file an amended complaint, and to that motion counsel for defendant verbally objected, alleging that the amendment was defective and insufficient. Written exceptions or objections to the amended complaint were not filed, but counsel for plaintiff agreed that the written brief filed on the day set for hearing upon defendants’ motion to dismiss etc. might be considered in lieu of formal objections.

The court regrets that it feels that it should not be called upon to display an amiability equal to that of counsel for the plaintiff. To do so would require it to examine both the complaint and the amendment to determine just which of the objections urged against the complaint applied to the amendment. No answer having been filed, the amendment will be allowed as of course. Rule 15, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. Counsel for defendants may then file specific motions or exceptions to it.
#### In re Guy E. HORNE, Jr., and James P. Barry.

No. 2012-1389.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 11, 2013.

Benjamin C. White, St. Onge Steward Johnston *&*Reens, LLC, of Stamford, CT, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were Wesley W. Whitmyer, Jr. and Todd M. Oberdick.

Michael S. Forman, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office of Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Raymond T. Chen, Solicitor, and Farheena Y. Rasheed, Associate Solicitor. Of counsel was Kristi L.R. Sawert, Associate Solicitor.

RADER, Chief Judge, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.