alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Hassan Hans Badreddine, President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director of Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (a) | the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      third quarter ended July 31, 2008, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                      



|By:    | /s/ Hassan Hans Badreddine                           
|------ | -----------------------------------------------------
|Name:  | Hassan Hans Badreddine                               
|Title: | President, Chief Executive
      Officer and Director
|       | (Principal Executive Officer)                        
|Date:  | September 12, 2008                                   

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Exhibit 10.16
 BLACKBOARD INC.
 Restricted Stock Agreement
 Name of Participant:Number of shares of restricted common stock awarded:Grant Date:Vesting Date:
  Blackboard Inc.By:Name:Title:  [Name of Participant]




---



##### 



BLACKBOARD INC.
 Restricted Stock Agreement  Granted Under 2004 Stock Incentive Plan
  Issuance of Restricted Shares
   Vesting
 Vesting Schedule
 [Insert vesting schedule]
  Certain Events




---



##### 



Forfeiture of Unvested Restricted Shares Upon Employment Termination
  Restrictions on Transfer
 provided




---



##### 



Restrictive Legends
   Rights as a Shareholder
 provided, however
 Provisions of the Plan
  Tax Matters
 Acknowledgments; Section 83(b) Election




---



##### 



Withholding
 Miscellaneous
 No Right to Continued Employment
 Governing Law
 Agreement in Connection with Public Offering




---



##### 



Participants Acknowledgments
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

JOSE L. RODRIGUEZ, SR., and JUSSARA 

RODRIGUEZ, on behalf of themselves and 

all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

-againstCivil Case No.: 2:11-cv-03267 CCC-JAD

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE 

CENTRAL CREDIT SERVICES, INC.; and 

JOHN DOES 1-25, 

 Defendant(s). 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Plaintiffs through their attorney, Joseph K, 

Jones, Esq., pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, do hereby 

withdraw their action with prejudice against CENTRAL CREDIT SERVICES, INC.; and 

JOHN DOES 1-25. This Court will retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the 

terms of the settlement agreement of the parties. 

Dated: Fairfield, New Jersey 

 December 5, 2011 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ Joseph K. Jones 

 Joseph K. Jones, Esq. (JJ-5509) 

 LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH K. JONES, LLC 

 375 Passaic Avenue, Suite 100 

 Fairfield, New Jersey 07004 

 973-227-5900 telephone 

 973-244-0019 facsimile 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Case 2:11-cv-03267-CCC-JAD Document 13 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 49
| (1)                  | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)                  | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company.   |

| */s/                Ronald E. Heineman*                                                                      | */s/                Scott Horne*                                                                      |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Ronald                E. Heineman Chief                Executive Officer Date:                April 16, 2007 | Scott                Horne Chief                Financial Officer Date:                April 16, 2007 |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1299088
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   142608
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1443886
<PP&E>                                        19342701
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6044601
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                20543158
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           494965
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    15960171
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  20543158
<SALES>                                         565474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3275526
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   235902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                697002
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              181527
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2161095
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2161095
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2161095
<EPS-BASIC>                                      36.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    36.45


</TABLE>
United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

____________________________________________

:

USA :

: Crim. No. 11-169

Plaintiff :

vs. : Order of Reassignment

BRUCE KERNAN :

:

Defendant :

____________________________________________ :

It is on this 11th day of September 2012, 

O R D E R E D that the entitled action is reassigned

from Judge William J. Martini to Judge Dennis M. Cavanaugh.

 S/Jerome B. Simandle 

Jerome B. Simandle, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Case 2:11-cr-00169-CCC Document 12 Filed 09/11/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 50
### M A N D A T E

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 1 of NUECES COUNTY, GREET INGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 7th day of August, 2014 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

JORGE MARTINEZ, Appe llant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13

- 14

- 00053

- CR (Tr.Ct.No. 2013

- 5253

- 2)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, co ncludes the appeal should be DISMISSED . The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 7, 2014.



WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said C ourt of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof affixed, at the City of Ed inburg, Texas this 29th day of January, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Criminal Action No.: 11-366 (JLL) 01

ORDER

This matter has been set for jury selection on Thursday,, September 13, 2012 at 9:30

a.m. and trial on Monday, September 17, 2012 , 2011 at 9:30 AM before this Court in

Courtroom 5D, 5th floor ofthe Martin Luther King Jr., Federal Building, Newark, New Jersey.

You must be prepared and ready to proceed for trial at that time; no further adjoumments will be

granted.

This timeline for pretrial motions and other trial matters shall be as follows:

I. Fully-briefed motions in limine are due to the Court on Wednesday, August 15,

2012. The parties shall meet-and-confer on an appropriate briefing schedule to

ensure that the Court receives only fully-briefed motions by that date.

2. No later than Thursday, September 6, 2012, the following must be submitted to

this Court:

a. Jointly agreed to proposed voir dire questions;

b. Jointly agreed to neutral statement about the case, not to exceed one

paragraph;

c. Jointly agreed to proposed jury charges. If there are charges on which the

parties cannot reach agreement, those charges should be submitted

separately in one document of disputed charges. For each disputed charge,

both parties’ versions should be listed together with supporting authorities.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

V.

JOHN ALFY SALAMA MARKUS

Defendants.

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:11-cr-00366-JLL Document 40 Filed 06/06/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 207
The agreed upon version of charges should be clearly marked as “Agreed

Upon” and should not contain authorities; and

d. A single numbered list of all exhibits, including a brief description and any

objection to the exhibit.

All ofthese items should be submitted to the Court in hard copy form delivered to

chambers. A copy should also be provided to the Court in electronic format on

CD, saved in WordPerfect or an early version of Word.

3. For trial, all exhibits should be pre-marked and must include exhibit stickers.

Copies of all trial exhibits must be prepared for the Judge, the Court Deputy, the

Court Reporter, and opposing counsel.

4. Telephone status conference, to be initiated by U.S. Attorney’s office, is set for

Monday, September 10, 2012 at 2:30 p.m.

IT IS on this 5th day ofJUNE, 2012, SO ORDERED.

Linares

States District Judge

Page2of 2

Case 2:11-cr-00366-JLL Document 40 Filed 06/06/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 208
**Exhibit 23.3****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-12976 and333-113054 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 24, 2006 relating to the financial statementsof Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (which audit report expresses an unqualified opinion on the financialstatements and includes a separate report titled Comments By Independent Registered CharteredAccountants for U.S. Readers on Canada - U.S. Reporting Differences referring to conditions andevents that cast substantial doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, changesin accounting principles that have a material effect on the comparability of the Company’sfinancial statements, and changes in accounting principles that have been implemented in thefinancial statements) and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. for theyear ended December 31, 2005.(signed) “Deloitte & Touche LLP”Deloitte & Touche LLP
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
              SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DoMark International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Scott Sieck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

                                DoMark International, Inc.
                                      Registrant


Date: April 12, 2010            By: /s/ Scott Sieck
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Scott Sieck
                                    Chief Executive Officer
sta

clear and convincing evidence fl a prepon

rci ii d -j-c cL()

Part 111—Directions Regarding Detention

The defendant is committed to the custody ofthe Attorney General or his designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate,

to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded areasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On or of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for theGovernment, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliv e de ndant to the United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance

in connection with a court proceeding.

August_18,2017

Date Signature ofJudge

Hon. Steven C. Mannion

Vame and Title of]ttdge

*lnsert as applicable: (a) Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 801 etseq.); (b) Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. §

951 etseq.); or(c) Section 1 of Act of Sept. 15, 1980 (21 U.S.C. § 955a).

(I The defendant is charged with an offense described in 18 U.S.C. § 31 42(f)( I) and has been convicted of a E federal

E acrimeofviolenceas defined in 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4).

an offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death.an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment often years or more is prescribed

§ 3142(f)(l)(A)-(C), or comparable state or local offenses.

L (2 The offense described in finding (I) was committed while the defendant was on release pending trial for a federal, state or local offense.L (3 A period of not more than five years has elapsed since the date of fl release of the defendant from imprisonment

for the offense described in finding (I).

(4 Findings Nos. (1), (2) and (3) establish a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the

safety of(an) other person(s) and the community. I further find that the defendant has not rebutted this presumption.

Alternative Findings (A)

J (I There is probable cause to believe that the defendant has committed an offense

for which a maximum term of imprisonment often years or more is prescribed

fl under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c).

(2 The defendant has not rebutted the presumption established by tinding I that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure

the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety of the community.

Alternative Findings (B)

(I There is a serious risk that the defendant will not appear.

j (2 There is a serious risk that the defendant will endanger the safety of another person or the community.

Part Il—Written Statement of Reasons for Detention

I find that the credible testimony and infonnation submitted at the hearing establishes by

erance of the evidence that

p-r

rI% ?//‘ £&i djc
Case 2:11-cv-00608-CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/02/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 1
Case 2:11-cv-00608-CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/02/11 Page 2 of 10 PageID: 2
Case 2:11-cv-00608-CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/02/11 Page 3 of 10 PageID: 3
Case 2:11-cv-00608-CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/02/11 Page 4 of 10 PageID: 4
Case 2:11-cv-00608-CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/02/11 Page 5 of 10 PageID: 5
Case 2:11-cv-00608-CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/02/11 Page 6 of 10 PageID: 6
Case 2:11-cv-00608-CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/02/11 Page 7 of 10 PageID: 7
Case 2:11-cv-00608-CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/02/11 Page 8 of 10 PageID: 8
Case 2:11-cv-00608-CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/02/11 Page 9 of 10 PageID: 9
Case 2:11-cv-00608-CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/02/11 Page 10 of 10 PageID: 10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC., a 

Delaware Corporation, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 v. 

MIMAR INVESTMENT CO., a Virginia 

Corporation; JAMES M. KOKOLIS, an 

individual; and PAULA KOKOLIS, an 

individual, 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: FINAL JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT

: 

: Civ. No. 11-3219 (WHW) 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

Walls, Senior District Judge 

 This matter having been opened to the Court by plaintiff, Days Inns Worldwide, Inc., by 

its attorneys, Clyde & Co US LLP, seeking the entry of final judgment by default against 

defendants Mimar Investment Co., James M. Kokolis, and Paula Kokolis pursuant to Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 55(b)(2), for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion, and good cause therefor, 

 IT IS on this 19th day of March, 2012, 

 ORDERED, ADJUGED, and DECREED that Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. have judgment 

against Mimar Investment Co., James M. Kokolis, and Paula Kokolis, jointly and severally, in 

the total amount of $115,516.13, comprised of the following: 

a) $108,355.77 for recurring fees owed (principal plus prejudgment interest); and 

b) $7,160.36 for attorneys' fees and costs. 

s/ William H. Walls 

United States Senior District Judge

Case 2:11-cv-03219-WHW-MCA Document 15 Filed 03/19/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 175
#### Anonymous, Respondent, v Duane Reade, Inc., Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 599]

*480The determination of whether to strike a pleading lies within the sound discretion of the trial court *(see*CPLR 3126 [3]; *Ciandolo v Trism Specialized, Carriers,*274 AD2d 369, 370 [2000]; *Vancott v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co.,*271 AD2d 438 [2000]; *Brown v United Christian Evangelistic Assn.,*270 AD2d 378, 379 [2000]). However, the drastic remedy of striking a pleading is not appropriate absent a clear showing that the failure to comply with discovery demands was willful or contumacious *(see*CPLR 3126 [3]; *Harris v City of New York,*211 AD2d 663, 664 [1995]). Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, it has failed to make a clear showing that the plaintiffs failure to be deposed was willful or contumacious.

Moreover, although the plaintiff admittedly failed to serve a note of issue by the court-ordered deadline, CPLR 3216 is “extremely forgiving” *(Baczkowski v Collins Constr. Co.,*89 NY2d 499, 503 [1997]), in that it “never requires, but merely authorizes, the Supreme Court to dismiss a plaintiff’s action based on the plaintiffs unreasonable neglect to proceed” *(Davis v Goodsell,*6 AD3d 382, 383 [2004]; *see Di Simone v Good Samaritan Hosp.,*100 NY2d 632, 633 [2003]). Under the circumstances of this case, where the parties had barely commenced discovery proceedings, and where a motion and cross motion to compel discovery were pending at the deadline for the service and filing of the note of issue, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in refusing to dismiss the action on the basis of the plaintiffs failure to meet that deadline *(see Davis v Goodsell,*6 AD3d 382 [2004]; *McCracken v Nitto Kohki USA,*271 AD2d 510 [2000]; *Matter of Simmons v McSimmons, Inc.,*261 AD2d 547 [1999]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.P., Lifson, Ritter and Garni, JJ., concur.
H. R. 4968

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 25 McHenry

Street in Rosine, Kentucky, as the ‘‘Bill Monroe Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

25 McHenry Street in Rosine, Kentucky, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Bill Monroe Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Bill Monroe

Post Office’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.