alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-5148

_____________________________

CHRISTOPHER LAMONT ALTMAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Thomas V. Dannheisser, Judge.

August 21, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and OSTERHAUS and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
pppy y 

30. Unemployed total and full-time workers by duration of unemployment

Duration of unemployment

Total Full-time workers

Thousands of persons Percent distribution Thousands of persons Percent distribution

2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009

 Total, 16 years and over ..................................... 8,924 14,265 100.0 100.0 7,446 12,523 100.0 100.0

Less than 5 weeks ................................................ 2,932 3,165 32.8 22.2 2,240 2,514 30.1 20.1

5 to 14 weeks ....................................................... 2,804 3,828 31.4 26.8 2,342 3,301 31.4 26.4

 5 to 10 weeks ..................................................... 1,888 2,408 21.2 16.9 1,550 2,052 20.8 16.4

 11 to 14 weeks ................................................... 917 1,420 10.3 10.0 791 1,249 10.6 10.0

15 weeks and over ............................................... 3,188 7,272 35.7 51.0 2,865 6,709 38.5 53.6

 15 to 26 weeks ................................................... 1,427 2,775 16.0 19.5 1,277 2,527 17.1 20.2

 27 weeks and over ............................................. 1,761 4,496 19.7 31.5 1,588 4,182 21.3 33.4

 27 to 51 weeks ................................................. 812 2,175 9.1 15.2 734 2,036 9.9 16.3

 52 weeks and over ........................................... 949 2,321 10.6 16.3 854 2,146 11.5 17.1

Average (mean) duration, in weeks ...................... 17.9 24.4  ̆  ̆ 19.0 25.5  ̆  ̆

Median duration, in weeks .................................... 9.4 15.1  ̆  ̆ 10.3 16.5  ̆  ̆

 NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data. Dash indicates no data or data that do not meet publication

criteria.

237
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JUNE L. ULSH

 

 v.

ZONING HEARING BOARD OF LOWER

PAXTON TOWNSHIP AND TRIPLE

CROWN CORPORATION

PETITION OF: TRIPLE CROWN

CORPORATION

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 537 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1838-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of West Virginia (FEMA-1838-DR), dated May 15, 2009, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         June 22, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Gregory W. Eaton, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Edward H. Smith as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E9-17223 Filed 7-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Udo Henseler, Chairman of the Board and  Chief Executive Officer of
eGene, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report (the "Annual Report")on Form
10-KSB of the Company.

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Annual Report.

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual
Report.

     4.   The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

          a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this Annual Report is
being prepared;

          b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this Annual Report based on such evaluation; and

          c)   Disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.

     5.   The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the Company's auditors and the Company's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

          a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

          b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
control over financial reporting.


Dated: March 30, 2005              By:    /s/ Udo Henseler
                                   Udo Henseler
                                   Chairman of the Board and  Chief
                                   Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-48534) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Plan and 2000 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-56610)
pertaining to the 1997 Stock Plan, the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the
2001 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan and the vEngines, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive
Plan of our report dated January 22, 2001 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Centillium Communications, Inc. included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
March 19, 2001
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 50 Filed 09/18/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 221
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 50 Filed 09/18/12 Page 2 of 10 PageID: 222
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 50 Filed 09/18/12 Page 3 of 10 PageID: 223
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 50 Filed 09/18/12 Page 4 of 10 PageID: 224
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 50 Filed 09/18/12 Page 5 of 10 PageID: 225
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 50 Filed 09/18/12 Page 6 of 10 PageID: 226
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 50 Filed 09/18/12 Page 7 of 10 PageID: 227
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 50 Filed 09/18/12 Page 8 of 10 PageID: 228
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 50 Filed 09/18/12 Page 9 of 10 PageID: 229
Case 2:11-cr-00470-SDW Document 50 Filed 09/18/12 Page 10 of 10 PageID: 230
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4917

AN ACT

To amend title 5, United States Code, to authorize appropriations for the Administrative Conference of the United

States for fiscal years 2005, 2006, and 2007, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4917 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Regulatory

3 Improvement Act of 2004’’.

4 SEC. 2. PURPOSES.

5 (a) PURPOSES.—Section 591 of title 5, United States

6 Code, is amended to read as follows:

7 ‘‘§ 591 Purposes

8 ‘‘The purposes of this subchapter are—

9 ‘‘(1) to provide suitable arrangements through

10 which Federal agencies, assisted by outside experts,

11 may cooperatively study mutual problems, exchange

12 information, and develop recommendations for action

13 by proper authorities to the end that private rights

14 may be fully protected and regulatory activities and

15 other Federal responsibilities may be carried out ex16 peditiously in the public interest;

17 ‘‘(2) to promote more effective public participa18 tion and efficiency in the rulemaking process;

19 ‘‘(3) to reduce unnecessary litigation in the reg20 ulatory process;

21 ‘‘(4) to improve the use of science in the regu22 latory process; and

23 ‘‘(5) to improve the effectiveness of laws appli24 cable to the regulatory process.’’.

25 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Title 5 of the

26 United States Code is amended—
3

•HR 4917 EH

1 (1) in section 594 by striking ‘‘purpose’’ and

2 inserting ‘‘purposes’’; and

3 (2) in the table of sections of chapter 5 of part

4 I by amending the item relating to section 591 to

5 read as follows:

‘‘591. Purposes’’.

6 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

7 Section 596 of title 5, United States Code, is amend8 ed to read as follows:

9 ‘‘§ 596. Authorization of appropriations

10 ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out

11 this subchapter not more than $3,000,000 for fiscal year

12 2005, $3,100,000 for fiscal year 2006, and $3,200,000

13 for fiscal year 2007. Of any amounts appropriated under

14 this section, not more than $2,500 may be made available

15 in each fiscal year for official representation and enter16 tainment expenses for foreign dignitaries.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 8,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4917

AN ACT

To amend title 5, United States Code, to authorize

and 2007, and for other purposes.of the United States for fiscal years 2005, 2006,appropriations for the Administrative Conference
Case 2:11-cr-00497-SRC Document 70 Filed 02/01/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 56
Case 2:11-cr-00497-SRC Document 70 Filed 02/01/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 57
S05A0214.

#### TABOR v. THE STATE.

(610 SE2d 59)

Thompson, Justice.

Via indictment, Stuart Tabor was charged with four counts of carrying a weapon within a school safety zone in violation of OCGA § 16-11-127.1. After entering a plea of not guilty, Tabor filed a pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus asserting that he was being detained unlawfully because at the time in question the weapons were in the locked compartment of an automobile. See OCGA § 16-*9911-127.1 (c) (8). The petition was denied and Tabor brought this direct appeal.1

Decided March 7, 2005.

Stuart Tabor, *pro se.*

*N. Stanley Gunter, District Attorney, Jeremy D. Clough, Assistant District Attorney, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General,*for appellee.

We find no error in the denial of habeas corpus relief. Inasmuch as his criminal trial is pending, Tabor can raise the issues he raised in his petition for habeas corpus, and present evidence to defend himself, upon the trial of the case. *Kearse v. Paulk,*264 Ga. 509 (448 SE2d 369) (1994), citing *Jackson v. Lowry,*170 Ga. 755, 756-757 (154 SE 228) (1930). See also *Oduok v. Bowden,*272 Ga. 778 (535 SE2d 241) (2000).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

 See *Smith v. Nichols,*270 Ga. 550, 551 (1) (512 SE2d 279) (1999) (direct appeal lies when pretrial habeas corpus petitioner is in custody in lieu of bond).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 136 (Friday, July 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34751-34752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16983]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13490-000]


FFP Project 80, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application 
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and 
Competing Applications

July 10, 2009.

    On May 22, 2009, FFP Project 80, LLC filed an application for a 
preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, 
proposing to study the feasibility of the Linwood Bend Hydrokinetic 
Project, to be located on the Mississippi River, in Pemiscot County, 
Missouri and Dyer County, Tennessee.
    The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant 
the permit holder priority to file a license application during the 
permit term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder 
to perform any land disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands 
or waters owned by others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed Linwood Bend Hydrokinetic Project consists of: (1) 
3,928 proposed 40 kilowatt Free Flow generating units having a total 
installed capacity of 157.12 megawatts; (2) a 5.2-mile-long, 69 
kilovolt transmission line; and (3) appurtenant facilities. The 
proposed Linwood Bend Hydrokinetic Project would have an average annual 
generation of 688 gigawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Ramya Swaminathan, Vice President of 
Development, Free Flow Power Corporation, 33 Commercial Street, 
Gloucester, MA 01930; phone: (978) 226-1531.
    FERC Contact: Kim Carter, 202-502-6486.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit

[[Page 34752]]

these types of filings please go to the Commission's Web site located 
at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this 
project, including a copy of the application, can be viewed or printed 
on the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13490) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-16983 Filed 7-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EMN-12.31.2012-Ex 10.33


Exhibit 10.33


AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT
AMENDMENT dated as of March 2, 2012 (the “Amendment”) to the Credit Agreement dated as of December 7, 2011, (the “Credit Agreement”) among EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY (the “Company”), the banks, financial institutions and other institutional lenders (the “Initial Lenders”) and initial issuing banks (the “Initial Issuing Banks”) listed on the signature pages thereof, CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC. and J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, as joint lead arrangers, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as syndication agent, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BARCLAYS BANK PLC, THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as documentation agents, and CITIBANK, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Agent”).


W I T N E S S E T H :
The parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1.  Defined Terms; References.  Unless otherwise specifically defined herein, each term used herein that is defined in the Credit Agreement has the meaning assigned to such term in the Credit Agreement.  Each reference to “hereof”, “hereunder”, “herein” and “hereby” and each other similar reference and each reference to “this Agreement” and each other similar reference contained in the Credit Agreement shall, after this Amendment becomes effective, refer to the Credit Agreement as amended hereby.


Section 2.  Amendments.


(a)     Section 5.02(d) of the Credit Agreement is amended by (i) deleting the word “Restricted” in clause (iii) thereof and (ii) replacing the words “clauses (ii) through (iv)” with the words “clauses (ii), (iv), (v) and (vi).”
(b)    Section 5.03 of the Credit Agreement is amended by adding after the first occurrence of the word “Subsidiaries” the words “on a Consolidated basis.” 
Section 3.  Representations of Company.  The Company represents and warrants that (i) the representations and warranties of the Company set forth in Article 4 of the Credit Agreement will be true on and as of the Amendment Effective Date (as defined in Section 6 below) and (ii) no Default will have occurred and be continuing on such date.


Section 4.  Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.


Section 5.  Counterparts.  This Amendment may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument.


Section 6.  Effectiveness.  This Amendment shall become effective on the date when the following conditions are met (the “Amendment Effective Date”):


(a)the Agent shall have received from each of the Company and the Required Lenders a counterpart hereof signed by such party or facsimile or other written confirmation (in form satisfactory to the Agent) that such party has signed a counterpart hereof.

189
**EXHIBIT 32.2****Section 906 Principal Financial Officer Certification**I, Peter Q. Repetti, Chief Financial Officer of Blackboard Inc. (“the Company”), do hereby certify,under the standards set forth in and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the“Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated:February 15, 2006              /s/ PETER Q. REPETTI   Peter Q. Repetti   Chief Financial Officer
Plaintiff. ORDER

APOTEX INC. and APOI EX CORP.

Defendants,

A Report and Recommendation was tiled on January 24.2011 recommending that this Court

deny Defendants Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp.’s (Apotex”) motion to disqualify Dr. Alexander

Klibanov &om serving as an expert witness on behalf of Plaintiffs (docket entry 34). Apotex also

seeks to preclude Novartis from relying on Dr. Klibanovs opinions in their entirety. The parties

ere given notice that the had until February 7. 201 1 to object to the Report and Recommendation

pursuant to Local Ciil Rule 72.l(c)(2). No objections having been received, and the Court having

reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo, and good cause appearing;

It is. on this gth day of February, 2011.

ORDEREI) that the Report and Recorntnendation ofMagistrate Judge Esther Salas at docket

entry 115 is hereby adopted as the opinion of the Court: and it is further

ORDERED that Apotex’s motion to disqualify Dr. Alexander Klihanov from ser ing as an

expert witness on behalf of Plaintiffs and to preclude Novartis from relying on Dr. Kilhano ‘s

opinion is denied.

. I T

P11 ER 0. Sl-l1:RIDAN, 1. .S.DJ.