alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Annual Report of Nanosphere, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Roger Moody, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                 /s/ J. Roger Moody, Jr.   J. Roger Moody, Jr.   Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer   March 19, 2008
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC-JAD Document 133 Filed 03/20/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1092
Case 2:11-cv-03621-CCC-JAD Document 133 Filed 03/20/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1093
Case 3:11-mj-05017-TJB   Document 54   Filed 05/11/11   Page 1 of 1 PageID: 132
Case 2:11-cr-00277-SRC Document 280 Filed 08/16/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 3443
Case 2:11-cr-00277-SRC Document 280 Filed 08/16/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 3444
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

      ( print page 33489)    
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, July 16, 2009 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, July 16, 2009 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; other matters relating to enforcement proceedings; and opinions.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: July 9, 2009.

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-16596 Filed 7-9-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

_______________________________________ 

: 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : 

: Criminal No. 2:11-cr-271 (FSH) 

v. : 

: ORDER 

MARUK MASOOD. : 

 : 

_______________________________________ 

This matter having come before the Court upon a Motion for Early Termination of 

Probation dated August 1, 2014 [Document No. 69] by Defendant Maruk Massod, represented by 

his attorney John P. McDonald, the Government having submitted opposition on August 5, 2014 

[Document No. 70]; and 

the Court having reviewed the parties’ briefs, considered the seriousness of the crime, 

considered Judge Brown’s reasons for imposing a sentence with a substantive variance from the 

advisory guideline range, considered whether any change of circumstances has occurred since the 

time of sentencing, and 

the Court having determined that the probationary sentence conferred a major benefit upon 

the defendant; that serving out that minor sentence does not impose an undue burden on the 

defendant; that the burden of being on probation for the term imposed was itself a lenient sentence 

in light of the serious crime involved, which sought to enrich the defendants at the expense of the 

American taxpayers who must support Medicaid and other subsidized medical programs; and that 

Judge Brown’s intent in imposing that sentence was to keep the defendant out of jail to care for 

Case 2:11-cr-00271-FSH Document 71 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 151
her children, but yet also to be a daily reminder of the crime she had participated in to serve as a 

deterrence; 

IT IS on this 8th day of August 2014, 

ORDERED that the Defendant’s request is DENIED. The sentence of probation will be 

continued to its conclusion. 

s/ Faith S. Hochberg 

United States District Judge 

Case 2:11-cr-00271-FSH Document 71 Filed 08/08/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 152
EX-10.18



 Exhibit 10.18 
 Fees to be Paid to the Non-Employee Directors 
 of 

Sealed Air Corporation (the “Corporation”) 
 2013 
 Members of the Board of Directors who are not officers or employees of the
Corporation or any subsidiary of the Corporation (“non-employee directors”) shall be paid the following directors’ fees in cash, payable quarterly in arrears on or about the first day of the succeeding calendar quarter, which fees
shall be in addition to retainers payable to non-employee directors under the Sealed Air Corporation 2002 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors: 
  

	 	(i)	for each non-employee director who is designated as chair of the Audit Committee, a fee of Six Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($6,250) per calendar quarter for
serving as chair, and for each other member of the Audit Committee, a fee of Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500) per calendar quarter for serving as a member; 


 

	 	(ii)	for each non-employee director who is designated as chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, a fee of Three Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars
($3,750) per calendar quarter for serving as chair, and for each other member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, a fee of One Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy Five Dollars ($1,875) per calendar quarter for serving as a member;


  

	 	(iii)	for each non-employee director who is designated as chair of the Organization and Compensation Committee, a fee of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) per calendar quarter
for serving as chair, and for each other member of the Organization and Compensation Committee, a fee of Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500) per calendar quarter for serving as a member; 


 

	 	(iv)	a fee of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500) per calendar quarter for serving as lead director, or Six Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($6,250) per calendar
quarter for serving as such and as chair of a standing committee during the same quarter; 

  

	 	(v)	a fee of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000) per day for special assignments undertaken by a non-employee director at the request of the Board or any committee of the Board
or for attending a director education program; and 

  

	 	(vi)	meeting fees as approved by the Board of Directors for non-employee directors who serve on any special committee or for attendance at special meetings of the Board of
Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors in the event of a major transaction, etc. 

 The amount of the Annual Retainer
(as defined in the Sealed Air Corporation 2002 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors) to be paid to Non-Employee Directors of the Corporation who are elected at the 







 
2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is $90,000 payable in shares of Common Stock plus $75,000 payable in cash unless the Non-Employee Director elects payment of the cash portion in shares of
Common Stock. 
 Under the Sealed Air Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, a non-employee director may elect to defer all or
part of his or her Annual Retainer until the director retires from the Board. None of the other fees mentioned above is eligible to be deferred.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Ben Franklin Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Glen A. Miller, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (2) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2008                     
|                                          
|/s/ Glen A. Miller                        
|Glen A. Miller                            
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 131 (Friday, July 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16396]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 9:01 a.m. on 
Tuesday, July 7, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider a matter 
related to the Corporation's corporate, supervisory, and resolution 
activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice 
Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, seconded by Director Thomas J. Curry 
(Appointive), concurred in by Director John C. Dugan (Comptroller of 
the Currency), Director John E. Bowman (Acting Director, Office of 
Thrift Supervision), and Chairman Sheila C. Bair, that Corporation 
business required its consideration of the matter which was to be the 
subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; 
that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public 
interest did not require consideration of the matter in a meeting open 
to public observation; and that the matter could be considered in a 
closed meeting by authority of subsection (c)(9)(B) of the ``Government 
in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550-17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

    Dated: July 7, 2009.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. E9-16396 Filed 7-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7282
WARREN H. COX, Petitioner - Appellant, versus FRANKLIN FREEMAN, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-97-191-5-BR2) Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 11, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Warren H. Cox, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Cox v. Freeman , No. CA-97-191-5-BR2 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determine d that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-40869 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

HILARIO GARZA, III, also known as Lalo

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas

(C-95-CR-107-01)

March 7, 1997

Before WISDOM, KING, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Garza argues that the district court (1) erred in determining

the drug quantity attributable to him under the sentencing

guidelines; (2) erred in assessing a two-level upwar d adjustment

for the poss ession of a firearm during the commission of a drug

trafficking offense; and (3) denied Garza the equal protection of1 Uni ted States v. Navejar , 963 F.2d 732, 735 (5th Cir.

1992).

2 the laws by applying a two-level upward adjustment to his sentence

while refusing to enhance a co-conspirator’s sentence on the same

grounds. Garza also argues that he had ineffective assistance of

counsel at sentencing.

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and

find no reversible error. We do not review an assertion of

ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal unless the issue

has been presented to the district court; otherwise there is no

opportunity for the development of a record on the merits of the

claim. 1 The claim of ineffective assistance of counsel was not

presented to the district court; therefore, we do not address this

issue.

AFFIRMED.
**SUBSIDIARIES        OF DEBT RESOLVE, INC.**

| Subsidiary                                                                      |   | Owner                                            |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
| DRV                    Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company        |   | Debt                    Resolve, Inc.            |
|                                                                            |   |                                             |
| EAR                    Capital I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company     |   | DRV                    Capital LLC.              |
|                                                                            |   |                                             |
| First                    Performance Corporation, a Nevada corporation          |   | Debt                    Resolve, Inc.            |
|                                                                            |   |                                             |
| First                    Performance Recovery Corporation, a Nevada corporation |   | First                    Performance Corporation |

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1397

JEREMIAH HENDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY FOR ROCKBRIDGE COUNTY, VIRGINIA; ROCKBRIDGE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; ROCKBRIDGE SQUARE ASSOCIATES LLC; SUNTRUST BANK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CA-02-55-6) Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 3, 2004 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeremiah Henderson, Appellant Pro Se. Carlene Booth Johnson, PERRY & WINDELS, Dillwyn, Virginia; Walter Herbert Peake, III, Nancy Fuller Reynolds, FRITH, ANDERSON & PEAKE, Roanoke, Virginia; John Ray Alford, Jr., James Frederick Watson, CASKIE & FROST, Lynchburg, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jeremiah Henderson appeals from the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion in which he sought reconsideration of the district court’s denial of his motion to reinstate his case and to file an amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeHenderson v. Commonwealth Attorney for Rockbridge County , No. CA-02-55-6 (W.D. Va. Mar. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.3
Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002),  I, the  undersigned  President  and Chief
Executive  Officer of Tidelands Oil & Gas Corporation,  (the  "Company"),  herby
certify that,  to the best of my knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
the Company for the period ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies
with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 and that  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the  registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated May 12, 2003.
                                                         /s/ Michael Ward
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        President and CEO
Case 2:11-cr-00290-KM Document 18 Filed 05/31/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 40
Case 2:11-cr-00290-KM Document 18 Filed 05/31/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 41
Case 2:11-cr-00290-KM Document 18 Filed 05/31/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 42
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

KOLE AKINOLA,

 Defendants.

Criminal Action No.: 11-310 (JLL)

ORDER

LINARES, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s application to recall Officer Timothy

Faranda to the stand during the Defendant’s case-in-chief. The Court has considered the

submissions of the parties and for good cause shown,

IT IS on this 11 day of May, 2012, th

ORDERED that Officer Faranda will be allowed to testify again to the extent and

limitations described in Defendant’s May 4, 2012 letter to the Court. Specifically, Officer

Faranda may be asked about the meaning of the HGN Log, his compliance with the GRPD

Guidelines, his knowledge of Defendant’s probationary status at the time Defendant was arrested,

his inventory of the contents of Defendant’s bag at the police station, and Officer Schwartz’s

testimony; and it is further

ORDERED that no other Officer who has already testified shall be recalled by the

Defense.

SO ORDERED. 

s/ Jose L. Linares 

JOSE L. LINARES

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:11-cr-00310-JLL Document 64 Filed 05/11/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 863
#### eBAY INC. and Microsoft Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Cabelas Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KELORA SYSTEMS, LLC, Defendant-Appellant. Kelora Systems, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Target Corporation, Amazon.com, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., Costco Wholesale Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Company, Audible, Inc., and Zappos.com, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and Dell, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and Newegg Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 2012-1474, 2012-1475, 2012-1476.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 19, 2013.

Robert D. Becker, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, of Palo Alto, CA, argued for the defendant-appellant, Kelora Systems, LLC. With him on the brief were Ronald S. Katz and Shawn G. Hansen.

Constantine L. Trela, Jr., Sidley Austin, LLP, of Chicago, IL, argued for all plaintiffs-appellees and defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Richard A. Cederoth and Theodore W. Chandler, of Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellees, eBay, Inc. et al. Also on the brief were Gregory P. Sitrick, Quarles & Brady LLP, of Phoenix, AZ; Christopher J. Fahy, of Chicago, IL; Jeffrey L. Fillerup, McKen-na Long *&*Aldridge, LLP, of San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellees, Cabela’s Inc.; Jonathan S. Franklin, Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P., of Washington, DC; Dan D. Davison, of Dallas, TX; Richard S. Zembek and Daniel S. Leventhal, of Houston, TX; Gilbert A. Greene and Sheila Kadura, of Austin, TX, for defendants-appellees, Target, et al.; Joseph A. Mical-lef and Scott M. Border, Sidley Austin, LLP, of Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee, Dell, Inc.; Kimball R. Anderson and Kathleen B. Barry, of Winston & Strawn LLP, of Chicago, IL; Kent E. Baldauf, Jr., Bryan P. Clark and Daniel H. Brean, The Webb Law Firm, of Pittsburgh, PA, for defendant-appellee, New-egg.

NEWMAN, PLAGER, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
---

Exhibit 32.2CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CYBRA
Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harold
Brand, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: August 15, 2011
    /s/ Harold BrandHarold BrandInterim Chief Financial Officer


---