alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.10

[LOGO]

First
Horizon Pharmaceutical Corporation
Mr. Patrick Fourteau
6195 Shiloh Road

Alpharetta,
GA 30005

USA

| |  | 29 October 2004
Zie
| |  | -------------------

Renewal of the Term of the Distribution Agreement between First Horizon Pharmaceutical Corporation and Pohl-Boskamp effective February 1, 2000

Dear
Mr. Fourteau,

As
mutually agreed during the meeting in Hohenlockstedt on October 6, 2004 we herewith confirm that the Distribution Agreement between First Horizon and Pohl-Boskamp will be renewed for an
additional five-year-period effective February 1, 2005. It will be renewed automatically for two-year-periods each unless it is cancelled with a six-month-notice by one of the contractual
parties before the end of the five-year-period or respectively before each of the following two-year periods.

The
parties have further agreed to abstain from defining new minimum sales.

All
other stipulations of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.

Please
have First Horizon execute below to signify its approval to the above and return one copy of it by return mail.

Yours
sincerely,

POHL BOSKAMP

|/s/THOMAS HOPPNERDr. Thomas Hoppner
Senior Director
Business Unit Export |  | /s/HEIKE JÖRNHeike Jörn
Senior Director
Legal Department       
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/PATRICK FOURTEAUPatrick Fourteau
President &
Chief Operating Officer  |  | /s/RALPH JORDANRalph Jordan
Senior Director
of Business Affairs

---



QuickLinks
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 

DAVID BARTLETT, 

Plaintiff,

v.

RADIO SHACK CORP., et al.,

Defendants.

 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Case No. 10-3882 (FSH)

STANDING ORDER

REQUIRING SUBMISSION OF

INFORMATION REGARDING

REMOVAL

Date: August 4, 2010

HOCHBERG, District Judge

Upon removal of the action and for good cause, the Court hereby orders the removing

Defendants by August 18, 2010 to serve and file a submission providing the below information. 

Plaintiff must also serve and file a submission responding to point #5 below by August 18, 2010

if Defendants are asserting diversity jurisdiction: 

1. A full explanation if all Defendants served at the time of removal did not join in

the notice of removal. 

2. A full explanation if the notice of removal was dated more than thirty (30) days

after the first Defendant was served.

3. If the action has been removed on grounds of diversity jurisdiction, a statement if

any of the Defendants served at the time of removal is a citizen of the forum state.

4. If the action has been removed on grounds of diversity jurisdiction, the citizenship

of Plaintiff and all named Defendants.

1

Case 2:10-cv-03882-FSH-MAS Document 3 Filed 08/04/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 73
5. If the action has been removed on grounds of diversity jurisdiction, both parties

must submit a good faith estimate of the amount in controversy with supporting

documentation. 

6. If the action has been removed on the basis of federal question jurisdiction, the

federal statutory provision that gives rise to the jurisdiction and the specific

section that provides Plaintiff with a private right of action.

If the Plaintiff has a response to Defendants’ submission, such response shall be filed and

served by August 25, 2010. Any motion to remand the action to state court based on any

procedural defects in the removal must be filed, if at all, thirty (30) days after removal or sooner. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Hon. Faith S. Hochberg 

Hon. Faith S. Hochberg, U.S.D.J. 

2

Case 2:10-cv-03882-FSH-MAS Document 3 Filed 08/04/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 74
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 130 (Thursday, July 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16253]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Maritime Administration


Marine Transportation System National Advisory Council

ACTION: National Advisory Council Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Maritime Administration announces that the Marine 
Transportation System National Advisory Council (MTSNAC) will hold a 
meeting to assess its priorities for the coming year, and to discuss 
other issues of importance to the Marine Transportation System. A 
public comment period is scheduled for 11 a.m.-11:30 a.m. on Friday, 
July 24, 2009. To provide time for as many people to speak as possible, 
speaking time for each individual will be limited to three minutes. 
Members of the public who would like to speak are asked to contact 
Richard J. Lolich by July 17, 2009. Commenters will be placed on the 
agenda in the order in which notifications are received. If time 
allows, additional comments will be permitted. Copies of oral comments 
must be submitted in writing at the meeting. Additional written 
comments are welcome and must be filed by August 4, 2009.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, July 23, 2009, from 9 a.m. 
to 5 p.m. and Friday, July 24, 2009, from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the Media Center at the U.S. 
Department of Transportation Headquarters, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., 
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Richard Lolich, (202) 366-0704; 
Maritime Administration, MAR-540, Room W21-310, 1200 New Jersey Ave., 
SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e99b808a81889b8dc7858685808a81a98d869dc78e869f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d2a0bbb1bab3a0b6fcbebdbebbb1ba92b6bda6fcb5bda4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. App 2, Sec. 9(a)(2); 41 CFR 101-6. 1005; 
DOT Order 1120.3B.

    Dated: July 1, 2009.
Christine Gurland,
Acting Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-16253 Filed 7-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4924 

To designate the United States courthouse at 300 North Hogan Street, 

Jacksonville, Florida, as the ‘‘John Milton Bryan Simpson United States 

Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2004 

Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida (for herself and Mr. CRENSHAW) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse at 300 North 

Hogan Street, Jacksonville, Florida, as the ‘‘John Milton 

Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse at 300 North Hogan 

5 Street, Jacksonville, Florida, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘John Milton Bryan Simpson United 

7 States Courthouse’’. 
2 

•HR 4924 IH 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘John Milton Bryan Simpson 

6 United States Courthouse’’. 

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hafiz Hayes, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 81]

*404Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J.), rendered July 2, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted murder in the second degree, robbery in the first and second degrees, burglary in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 35 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s request for a *Frye*hearing *(Frye v United States,*293 F 1013 [DC Cir 1923]) to determine the admissibility of expert testimony concerning the presence of gunshot residue on defendant’s clothing, offered by the People to prove defendant’s proximity to the shooting at issue. Defendant did not establish that the particular type of analysis employed by the expert was significantly different from standard techniques for analysis of gunshot residue that are generally accepted *(see People v Serrano,*219 AD2d 508, 509 [1995], *lv denied*87 NY2d 907 [1995]). The People laid a proper foundation for the expert’s opinion, and defendant’s arguments go to the weight and not the admissibility of the testimony *(see People v Wesley,*83 NY2d 417, 429 [1994]).

Defendant’s challenge to the court’s response to a jury note is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court’s response was meaningful and that the supplemental instruction on accomplice liability adequately conveyed that defendant could only be convicted as an accomplice if he intentionally aided the other participant and shared that person’s specific intent in the commission of the crimes (Penal Law § 20.00).

Defendant received effective assistance of counsel under the state and federal standards *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *see also Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Defendant’s contention that the court improperly directed that the sentences for the robbery and weapons possession convictions be served consecutively to the sentences for the attempted murder and burglary convictions is similar to a claim raised by his codefendant on appeal and rejected by this Court on the basis that “[t]he former crimes were committed through separate and distinct acts from the latter” *(People v Hayes,*22 AD3d 253, 254 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 882 [2005]). Concur—Buckley, PJ., Mazzarelli, Williams, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 134 (Wednesday, July 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34363-34364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16688]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993 National Fluid Power Association Technology 
Roadmap Joint Development Process

    Notice is hereby given that, on May 21, 2009, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), National Fluid Power Association 
Technology Roadmap Joint Development Process (``NFPA Technology 
Roadmap'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) The 
identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and 
objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: Bimba Manufacturing, Monee, IL; Bosch Rexroth, 
Hoffman Estates, IL; Caterpillar, Joliet, IL; Center for Compact and 
Efficient Fluid Power, Minneapolis, NN; Deltrol Fluid Products, 
Bellwood, IL; Eaton Corporation, Eden Prairie, NN; Enfield 
Technologies, Trumbull, CT; Festo Corporation, Hauppauge, NY; Gates 
Corporation, Denver, CO; HUSCO International, Waukesha, WI; Lynch

[[Page 34364]]

Fluid Controls, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada; Moog, East Aurora, IL; 
National Fluid Power Association, Milwaukee, WI; Pall Aeropower, Fort 
Myers, FL; Parker Hannif in, Cleveland, OH; Poclain Hydraulics, 
Sturtevant, WI; Quality Control, Chicago, IL; ROSS Controls, Troy, MI; 
Sauer-Danfoss, Ames, IA; Schmalz, Raleigh, NC; and Sun Hydraulics, 
Sarasota, FL.
    The general area of NFPA's planned activity is the joint 
development of an action plan to identify and prioritize research and 
development projects in the fluid power industry, specifically, 
research investments, capability developments, and skills acquisitions 
needed to achieve advancement in hydraulics and pneumatics technology 
to meet future fluid power needs. For more information concerning the 
joint activities, please contact Eric Lanke, CAE, Executive Director of 
the National Fluid Power Association at 3333 N. Mayfair Rd., Suite 211, 
Milwaukee, WI 53222.

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. E9-16688 Filed 7-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Case 2:11-cr-00165-KSH Document 88 Filed 01/23/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 363
Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-5   Filed 06/17/11   Page 1 of 10 PageID: 70

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-5   Filed 06/17/11   Page 2 of 10 PageID: 71

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-5   Filed 06/17/11   Page 3 of 10 PageID: 72

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-5   Filed 06/17/11   Page 4 of 10 PageID: 73

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-5   Filed 06/17/11   Page 5 of 10 PageID: 74

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-5   Filed 06/17/11   Page 6 of 10 PageID: 75

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-5   Filed 06/17/11   Page 7 of 10 PageID: 76

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-5   Filed 06/17/11   Page 8 of 10 PageID: 77

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-5   Filed 06/17/11   Page 9 of 10 PageID: 78

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-5   Filed 06/17/11   Page 10 of 10 PageID: 79
#### In the Matter of Norman Alexander, Respondent-Appellant, v Spanierman Gallery, LLC, Appellant-Respondent, and Universe Antiques, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[822 NYS2d 506]

*412Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith J. Gische, J.), entered May 1, 2006, which granted in part and denied in part petitioner’s motion for disclosure and examination prior to the commencement of an action, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to delete the direction that the identity of the sculpture’s purchaser not be publicly disclosed, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

In this proceeding, brought pursuant to CPLR 3102 (c), seeking discovery in advance of the filing and service of a complaint, petitioner was properly permitted to obtain disclosure of the identity of the individual or entity that purchased the sculpture allegedly stolen from his home, such person or entity being a potential defendant in a prospective action by petitioner to, inter alia, replevy the artwork *(see Matter of Wien & Malkin v Wichman,*255 AD2d 244 [1998]; *and see Solomon R. Guggenheim Found, v Lubell,*77 NY2d 311, 317 [1991]). There was, however, no basis for the restriction placed upon petitioner’s use of the purchaser’s identity. The purchase took place at a public sale and was publicly reported and the purchaser will, in any event, be publicly named in petitioner’s prospective action.

We have considered respondent’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, EJ., Mazzarelli, Williams, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
JACKSON LEWIS LLP

220 Headquarters Plaza

East Tower, 7th Floor

Morristown, New J 07960

(973) 538-6890

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

ROBERT J. MCCAFFERTY,

Plaintiff,

Civil Action No.: 2:11-cv-0 1146

V.

THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC,

Defendant.

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

WITH PREJUDICE

It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between Robert 3. MeCafferty (“Plaintiff”),

and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., (“Defendant”), through their undersigned counsel, who are

authorized to enter this stipulation, that Plaintiff’s action against Defendant is dismissed in its entirety

with prejudice and without costs or attorneys’ fees.

THE NIRENBERG LAW FIRM, LLC

One University Plaza, Suite 607

Hackensack, New Jersey 07601

4iathan 1. Nirenberg

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: February 2013

JACKSON LEWIS LLP

220 Headquarters Plaza

East Tower, 7th Floor

Morristown, NJ 07960 7

Jo in \l Nolan

Carla D. Macaluso

Attorneys for Defendant

Dated: February_, 2013

4847-9899-I 890, v. I

131879

;__;‘_

Case 2:11-cv-01146-JLL-MAH Document 93 Filed 03/11/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 856
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 13 Filed 09/09/10 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 125
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 13 Filed 09/09/10 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 126
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 13 Filed 09/09/10 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 127
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 13 Filed 09/09/10 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 128
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 13 Filed 09/09/10 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 129
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Warren Robb, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Pioneer Exploration Inc., (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for
      the quarter ended February 28, 2007 (the Quarterly Report) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                  

| | By:    | /s/ Warren Robb            
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | Warren Robb                
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | May 14, 2007               

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34042-34043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16603]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,051]


Aavid Thermalloy, LLC, Laconia, NH; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on June 26, 2009, applicable to workers of Aavid Thermalloy, LLC, 
Laconia, New Hampshire. The notice will soon be published in the 
Federal Register.
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of thermal management equipment.
    The review shows that all workers of Aavid Thermalloy, LLC, 
Laconia, New Hampshire, were previously certified eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under petition number TA-W-61,394, which expired 
on May 16, 2009.
    Therefore, in order to avoid an overlap in worker group coverage, 
the Department is amending the May 18, 2008 impact date established for 
TA-W-70,051, to read May 17, 2009.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-70,051 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Aavid Thermalloy, LLC, Laconia, New Hampshire, 
who became

[[Page 34043]]

totally or partially separated from employment on or after May 17, 
2009 through June 26, 2011, and all workers in the group threatened 
with total or partial separation from employment on June 26, 2009 
through June 26, 2011, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of July 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-16603 Filed 7-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting. 

*Name:*                         LIGO Annual Review Policy on access to LIGO Data for Physics (1208).                     

*Date and Time:*                         Tuesday, February 17, 2009; 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.                     

Wednesday, February 18, 2009; 8:30 a.m.-3 p.m. 

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation Rm. II-535 and Room 130.                     

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Beverly Berger, Program Director for Gravitational Physics, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.                         *Telephone*: (703) 292-7372.                     

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning NSF support of the LIGO project.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate LIGO's practices and proposed policies regarding the availability of data.                    

Dated: January 21, 2009, 

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-1658 Filed 1-26-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P