alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DoMar Exotic Furnishings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: October 12, 2007


/s/ Maureen Doyle Sieck
-----------------------------------------
Maureen Doyle Sieck, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
Case 2:11-cv-01210-SDW-MCA Document 11 Filed 04/23/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 154
Case 2:11-cv-01210-SDW-MCA Document 11 Filed 04/23/12 Page 2 of 7 PageID: 155
Case 2:11-cv-01210-SDW-MCA Document 11 Filed 04/23/12 Page 3 of 7 PageID: 156
Case 2:11-cv-01210-SDW-MCA Document 11 Filed 04/23/12 Page 4 of 7 PageID: 157
Case 2:11-cv-01210-SDW-MCA Document 11 Filed 04/23/12 Page 5 of 7 PageID: 158
Case 2:11-cv-01210-SDW-MCA Document 11 Filed 04/23/12 Page 6 of 7 PageID: 159
Case 2:11-cv-01210-SDW-MCA Document 11 Filed 04/23/12 Page 7 of 7 PageID: 160
Exhibit 32









CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT







Dann H. Bowman and
Sandra F. Pender hereby certify as follows:



1. They are the President
and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Chino Commercial Bancorp.



2. The Form 10-Q of
Chino Commercial Bancorp for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78(m) or 78(d)) and the information contained in the report on Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Chino Commercial Bancorp.





|Dated: August 14, 2012 |    
|---------------------- | ---
|                       |    
|                       | By:
|                       |    
|                       |    
|                       |    
|                       | By:
|                       |    
|                       |    
|                       |
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 14, 2008
    /s/  JAN SMILEKJan SmilekVice President, Finance
Acting Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Microdata Sneak Peek

Where are we going this y

and beyond?

Steve Henderson

July 17, 2015
Vision

From straightforward survey

Through efficient processing

To continuous dissemination

The CE Program will provide the n

Valuable, accurate, and comple

Information on consumer spend
Where are we headed and w

have we done lately?

Outline

• MORE FREE 

Microdata

• Income taxes 

estimation

• New Directions

for tables

• CE Redesign
New Directions recently

• MORE and MORE 

FREE Microdata

• Online at the CE 

website

• Went back to 1996
New Directions:

Faster Publication

• Add the newest six 

months, drop the oldest = 12 months of data

• Third mid-year 

publication was April 2, 2015

• Annual will be in 

early September
New Directions

Better After-Tax Income D

• Estimating Federal and State inco

taxes for the Interview Survey, as presented by Aaron Cobet yesterd

– National Bureau of Economic Research

(NBER) TaxSim Model

– Online at http://www.nber.org/~taxsim/– Started in the second quarter of 2013, so 

complete 12 months were first published mid-year tables in April 2015.
New Directions for After-T

Income

• Biggest improvement in the quali

CE non-spending data since 2004 Income Imputation

• Learn more from Geoffrey Paulin 

Aaron Cobet
New Directions for After-T

Income

Improvements to the Public 

Microdata

• Tax Units identified within Consum

Units

• Dependents• Taxes owed for each tax unit• Additional tax liability details
New Directions:

Table 1502. Composition of consum

• Previously in 2013, 

Husband and wife consumer units

• Starting with this 

April’s midyear table for 2013/14,

Married couple consumer units
New Directions:

More Information later this 

• All-CU 

“Prepublication” table online

• More historic pre1972 data tables • (Hopefully) NEW 

demographic variables and cross-tabulations 
New Directions:

Known Destination, Rou

becoming clearer

• Interview Wave 

changes started this year

• New Sample started 

this year

• Dropped income tax 

questions this year

• Gemini Changes later 
New Directions:

Gemini Changes

• Single sample• Two series of three 

instruments, both Diary and Interview

• One year apart
QUESTIONS?
Contact Informatio

Steve Henderson

Consumer Expenditure Survey

www.bls.gov/cex

202-691-5124

Henderson.Steve@bls.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5095 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5095

    To provide for an indefinite freeze on increases in the monthly 
             premiums for Medicare, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 15, 2004

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the 
   Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide for an indefinite freeze on increases in the monthly 
             premiums for Medicare, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Equity Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. FREEZE IN MONTHLY PREMIUMS FOR MEDICARE.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (3) of section 1839(a) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395r(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new sentence: ``Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of 
this paragraph, the monthly premium rate for any period after December 
31, 2004, shall be the monthly premium rate in effect for a month in 
2004.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to periods beginning after December 31, 2004.

SEC. 3. INCREASE IN TOP RATE OF INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX.

    (a) In General.--The table contained in paragraph (2) of section 
1(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to reductions in 
rates after June 30, 2001) is amended by striking the last row and 
inserting the following:

 
 
 
``2003 and 2004....................   25.0%    28.0%    33.0%      35.0%
 2005 and thereafter...............   25.0%    28.0%    33.0%   36.0%''.
 

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.16.(b)



 EXHIBIT 10.16 (b) 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
 ANIXTER INC. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

 AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2005 

WHEREAS, Anixter Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Anixter Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan as amended and restated
effective January 1, 2005 (the “Plan”) for the benefit of designated participants in the Plan; 
 WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section 10.1 of the Plan, the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan and has delegated that authority, in certain respects, to the Anixter Inc. Employee Benefits Administrative Committee (the “Committee”); and

 WHEREAS, the Committee wishes to amend the Plan to clarify who is deemed to be a “specified employee”
required to have his benefit commencement delayed in certain circumstances pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. 

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2012, as follows. 

 

	 	1.	Section 2.18 of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 

 “2.18 Key Employee 
 ‘Key Employee’ means an
individual who was one of the 50 highest-paid employees of the Company (which for this purpose shall include Participating Employers) on the basis of compensation recorded in Box 5 of the individual’s Form W-2 for the Plan Year ending prior to
the date of determination.” 
  

	 	2.	Section 5.1(b) of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 

 “(b) Six-Month Delay. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if, on a Participant’s date of Separation from Service not due to death or Disability, such Participant is a Key
Employee, and payment of his benefit would be paid within six (6) months of such Separation from Service, payment of his benefit shall be delayed until the first day of the month that is six (6) months after the Participant’s date of
Separation from Service. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Participant dies during this six (6) month period, his benefit shall be paid beginning on the first day of the month immediately following his death pursuant to
Section 5.5.” 
  

	 	3.	Section 5.1(c) of the Plan is amended to remove the phrase “six (6) month.” 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee has caused this First Amendment to be duly executed this 18th of December, 2012.

  

			
	ANIXTER INC. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
		
	By:	 	/s/ Theodore A. Dosch
		
	Its:	 	Chair
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0717

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

LYNDSEY MAE LALICKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 26, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Beth Baker

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 20 2021

01/20/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0717
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 135 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 135

    To prioritize the allocation of H-2B visas for States with low 
                          unemployment rates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 15, 2019

   Mr. Thune introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prioritize the allocation of H-2B visas for States with low 
                          unemployment rates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prioritizing Help to Businesses 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PRIORITIZING THE ALLOCATION OF H-2B VISAS FOR STATES WITH LOW 
              UNEMPLOYMENT RATES.

    (a) In General.--Section 214(g)(10) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(10)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(10)(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), the 
numerical limitation under paragraph (1)(B) shall not apply to H-2B 
visas issued to aliens for positions that are certified for employment 
pursuant to subpart A of part 655 of title 20, Code of Federal 
Regulations, to perform service or labor in a State that had a 
seasonally adjusted unemployment rate of 3.5 percent or lower in 3 of 
the 5 most recent monthly reports issued by the Bureau of Labor 
Statistics in the previous fiscal year.
    ``(B) The number of aliens exempted from the numerical limitation 
pursuant to subparagraph (A) in any State during any fiscal year may 
not exceed the lesser of--
            ``(i) 125 percent of the number of visas issued to aliens 
        working in such State during the most recently concluded fiscal 
        year; or
            ``(ii) 2,500.
    ``(C) If more H-2B visa applications are received in a fiscal year 
on behalf of aliens desiring to work in a State described in 
subparagraph (A) than the limit set forth in subparagraph (B)--
            ``(i) eligible applicants, in a number equal to such limit, 
        shall be selected, by lottery, from such applications for the 
        exemption under subparagraph (A); and
            ``(ii) the remaining applicants shall be subject to the 
        numerical limitation under paragraph (1)(B).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take place on the first day of the first fiscal year beginning after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Ex 10a16 2012 10-K






Exhibit 10(a)16




BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


THE SOUTHERN COMPANY


The following are the annual base salaries, effective March 1, 2013, of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of The Southern Company (the “Company”) and certain other executive officers of the Company who served during 2012.




	
		
	Thomas A. Fanning
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
	$1,587,750

	Art P. Beattie
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	$647,594

	Charles D. McCrary
Executive Vice President of the Company,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Alabama Power Company
	$803,247

	W. Paul Bowers
Executive Vice President of the Company,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Georgia Power Company
	$764,406

	Anthony J. Topazi*
Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer
	$646,089








* Retired August 1, 2012.  Salary shown was effective March 1, 2012.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

Camden Vicinage 

CITY SELECT AUTO SALES, INC., a New 

Jersey corporation, individually and as the 

representative of a class of similarly 

situated persons, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

DAVID RANDALL ASSOCIATES, INC. 

and RAYMOND MILEY III, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Electronically Filed 

Civil Action No. 

11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW 

ORDER 

 

THIS MATTER having come on before the Court upon the application of Alan 

C. Milstein, Esquire, attorney for plaintiff City Select Auto Sales, Inc., for an Order 

extending the time period to file a reply in support of Plaintiff’s previously-filed 

Motion for Class Certification for seven (7) days, or to April 6, 2012, and due and 

timely notice having been given to the defendants through their attorney of record, 

F. Emmett Fitzpatrick III, Esquire, and this Court having considered the moving 

papers, and such answering or reply papers as may have been filed, and for good 

cause having been shown; 

IT IS on this ________ day of _____________________, 2012 

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time, up to and 

including April 6, 2012, to file its reply in support of class certification is 

GRANTED. 

_______________________________ 

Hon. Jerome B. Simandle, U.S.D.J.

Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 34-1 Filed 03/29/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1100
EX-10.25



 EXHIBIT 10.25 

COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR OUTSIDE DIRECTORS 
 Cash Compensation 
 The cash fees paid to outside directors are as set forth
below. 
 Chairman of the Board 

The Chairman of the Board of Directors, Mr. R.S. Evans, receives a cash retainer fee at rate of $63,000 per year. Mr. Evans receives no other
cash compensation for his service on the Board and its Committees. 
 Other Non-Employee Directors 

Non-employee directors, other than Mr. Evans, receive the following cash compensation: 

 

					
	 Annual Board retainer
	  	$	20,250	  
	 Annual retainer – Audit Committee chairman
	  	$	8,100	  
	 Annual retainer – other Audit Committee members
	  	$	1,215	  
	 Annual retainer – Management Organization & Compensation Committee chairman
	  	$	2,430	  
	 Annual retainer – Executive Committee members
	  	$	1,620	  
	 Meeting fee
	  	$	1,620	  

 Stock Compensation 
 In accordance with Company’s non-employee directors’ stock compensation program, each non-employee director is awarded, on the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, a grant of restricted
stock units (“RSUs”) for a number of shares equal to the lesser of (i) shares valued at $15,000 on the date of grant, or (ii) 15,000 shares. 
 The RSUs vest in full on the date of the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders or upon a change of control of the Company. The shares of stock represented by vested RSUs are delivered to the director upon
cessation of his service on the Board. 
 On April 23, 2012, the date of the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, each of the non-employee
directors received a grant of 11,152 RSUs in accordance with the above-described program. These RSUs will vest in full on April 22, 2013, the date of the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. 

Other 
 The Company
reimburses its directors for reasonable expenses incurred in attending Board and Committee meetings.
tmok12ex10_10.htm


 


 



Exhibit 10.10


 


Effective as of 02/26/13




                         SUMMARY OF ANNUAL NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

















I.           Board Members (Other than the Chairman)







A.         Annual Cash Compensation


 


             Annual Cash Retainer:                                                                                                                                 $100,000


 


             Additional Cash Retainer for Chairman of Audit Committee:                                                                         $ 25,000


 


             Additional Cash Retainer for Chairs of Compensation Committee,


             Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Science and


             Technology Committee and Strategy and Finance Committee:                                                                      $ 15,000












B.         Equity Compensation


 


             Annual equity grants are made upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee.







 


II.          Chairman of the Board







A.         Annual Cash Compensation


 


             Annual Cash Retainer:                                                                                                                                         $270,000







B.         Equity Compensation


 


             Annual equity grants are made upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee.












III.        Travel Expenses


 


     Directors are reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings.