alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6551
HERMAN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FRANKLIN FREEMAN; DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-924) Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 21, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herman Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court entered its order on January 31, 1996; Appellant's notice ofappeal was dated April 4, 1996, and filed on April 9, 1996. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
FILED

October 26, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

JAMES AND CAROLYN CHRISMAN ) Appeal 

) No. 03-S-01-9706-CV-00077

Plaintiffs-Appellees )

)

v. ) Knox County

) No. 1-787-94

HILL HOME DEVELOPMENT, INC. )

and JIM HILL )

) Judgment of the Court of

Defendants-Appellants ) Appeals is REVERSED

 

JUDGMENT ORDER

 

This cause came to be heard upon briefs, argument of

counsel, and the record on appeal from the Court of Appeals. 

The Court is of the opinion that under the facts of this

case, summary judgment is appropriate for the claim of fraudulent

concealment against Hill because Hill demonstrated that plaintiffs

will be unable to prove an essential element of the tort. We are

also of the opinion that summary judgment is appropriate for the

claim of nuisance against Hill and Hill Home Development because

the four-year statute of repose in Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-3-202 bars

that claim. In accordance with the opinion filed herewith, it is

therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this Court that the judgment of

the Court of Appeals is reversed.

Costs of the appeal are taxed against the appellees, for

which execution may issue if necessary.

10/26/98
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          79,857
<SECURITIES>                                       400
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               131,815
<PP&E>                                       3,011,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                 713,798
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,429,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,038
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,285,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,429,366
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               363,224
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  144,001
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                219,223
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            219,223
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   219,223
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.31
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

Certification of

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Samuel L. Westover, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sonic Innovations, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sonic Innovations, Inc.

Dated: March 15, 2007



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/ SAMUEL L.
WESTOVER               
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)        

I, Michael M. Halloran, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sonic Innovations, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sonic Innovations, Inc.

Dated: March 15, 2007



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/S/ MICHAEL M. HALLORAN      
|Vice President and           
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF THE

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Richard Reincke, the CEO and CFO of GWS Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of GWS Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of GWS Technologies, Inc.

|                     |  |                                                
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: March 23, 2009 |  | /s/ RICHARD REINCKE                            
|                     |  | Richard Reincke                                
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Donald Sharpe, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Coronado Corp. for
      the period ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Coronado Corp.                                                                 

Dated: May 17, 2010

| | /s/
      Donald Sharpe      
| | -----------------------------
| | Donald Sharpe                
| | President                    
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
| | Coronado Corp.               

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Coronado Corp.
and will be retained by Coronado Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Case 2:11-mj-07040-CLW   Document 8   Filed 09/21/11   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 9

Case 2:11-mj-07040-CLW   Document 8   Filed 09/21/11   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DiSTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

vs. : HON. STANLEY R. CHESLER

CRIMINAL NO. I I -00277(SRC)

MELVIN FERNANDEZ,

Defendant.

ORDIR

This matter being opened to the Court by Abrams & Wofsy, Esqs., attorneys

defendant, Melvin Fernandez, Arthur J. Abrams, Esq. appearing with the consent of Pa

Fishman, the United States attorney for the District of New Jersey, Assistant United S

Attorney Anthony 3. Mahajan. appearing for an Order releasing the defendant’s United S

passport from the custody of United States Pre-Trial Services until Tuesday, September 4,

and permitting the defendant to travel to the state of Florida on August 25, 2012 and allo

him to travel out of the United States from August 27. 2012 to August 31, 2012 and the UiStates Attorney consenting thereto and good cause being shown;

ITiSonthis dayofJfjS ,2012

ORDERED that Pre-Trial Services return defendant Melvin Fernandez’s United Si

passport to defendant on August 24, 2012 until September 4, 2012 after the Labor Day wee

when Pre-Trial Services reopens, at which time defendant Melvin Fernandez shall once asurrender his passport to Pre-Trial Services and it is further
te of New

I berebv Cofl5eflt to the form

and entry ofilte within Order

-

—

-—

Anthony Mahajan. AUSA

United District Court Judge
CKH-12.31.2012-Ex 10.27






Exhibit 10.27
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors
Directors who are not officers of SEACOR Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) receive an annual retainer of $52,000 and $2,000 for every regular and special Board and Committee meeting they attend via telephone and $4,000 for every regular and special Board and Committee meeting they attend in person.
Each member of the Board who is not an employee of the Company is also granted options and Common Stock pursuant to the SEACOR Holding Inc.'s 2007 Share Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.29 to the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007).
#### United States *v.*Ball and another.

*(Circuit Court, D. Oregon.*

August 5, 1887.)

Deady, J.

This action was brought on the same day with the foregoing one, to recover $8,250 damages for the conversion by the defendants of 2,750,000 feet of timber cut and removed' by said Green from the premises aforesaid, between January, 1884, and January, 1887.

The answer of the defendants contains a defense similar to the one already considered, with the addition that the defendants, in purchasing the logs in question, and manufacturing them into lumber, were acting as the directors and agents of the Yamhill Lumbering Company, a corporation formed under the laws of Oregon; •and that only 846,000 feet of logs were so obtained by them,—141,000 prior to January 11,1886, when the final certificate was issued to Green, and 705,000 afterwards.

The demurrer to the defense is sustained, for the reason already given.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-61940 and 333-66982 on
Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-43334, 333-53970, 333-54932, 333-105215, 333-124777,
333-150022 and 333-163684 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 25, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Sonus
Networks, Inc., and the effectiveness of Sonus Networks, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sonus
Networks, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boston,
Massachusetts
February 25, 2010

---



QuickLinks
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40273 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. RODNEY STEVENSON, also known as Arod , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:12

- CR

- 27

- 7

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Rodney Stevenson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Stevenson h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 2 1 , 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40273 Document: 00512539927 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014No. 13

- 40273

Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40273 Document: 00512539927 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
Exhibit 10.21 12.29.2012






EXHIBIT 10.21


NOTICE OF NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION GRANT 
TO NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR
(2006 STOCK PLAN)


This certifies that ________________ has an option to purchase __________________ shares of common stock, par value $.10 per share, of St. Jude Medical, Inc., a Minnesota corporation.
Social Security Number: _______________
Address: ____________________________
Grant Date: __________________________    
Purchase Price Per Share: $______________        
Expiration Date: ______________________
Exercisable Date: 100% exercisable on ________    
This stock option is governed by, and subject in all respects to, the terms and conditions of the Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of this document, and the St. Jude Medical, Inc. 2006 Stock Plan, a copy of which is available upon request.  This Notice of Non-Qualified Stock Option Grant to Non-Employee Director has been duly executed, by manual or facsimile signature, on behalf of St. Jude Medical, Inc.
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
By: ________________________________________
Name: ______________________________________                    
Title: _______________________________________
vs.

SCHEDULING ORDER

COOPER TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY,

Defendant.

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on June 7, 2013, for a Status

Conference: Ronald Grayzel, Esq. of Levinson Axelrod, P.A. and Andrew Nebenzahl,

Esq. and Rebecca Rogers, Esq., of Smith Lee Nebenzahl, appearing on behalf of Plaintiff,

and Jeffrey L. OtHara, Esq. and Catherine G. Bryan, Esq. of Clyde & Co US LLP. Sherry

Bankhead, Esq. of Johnson Trent and Brandi Doniere, Esq. of Thacker Martinsek EPA.

appearing on behalf of Defendant; and for good cause shown,

IT IS on this &ofJune, 2013,

ORDERED that the parties will complete all fact discovery, including fact

witness depositions and document reviews, by August 30, 2013; and it is further

ORDERED that a status call with the undersigned shall take place on September

24, 2013 at 11:30 a.m. and that defense counsel shall initiate said call; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiffs liability and medical expert reports shall be served no

later than October 30, 2013; and it is further

ORDERED that defendanfs liability and medical expert reports shall be served

no later than December 6, 2013; and it is further

ORDERED that expert depositions shall he completed no later than January 17,

2014; and it is further

ORDERED that a Settlement Conference will be conducted by the undersigned,

at the Clarkson S. Fisher United States Courthouse, Trenton, New Jersey on December

12, 2013, at 10:00 aCm, Counsel and parties with full authority to settle the case are

I 064378v1
of the Settlement Conference. Plaintiff shall serve a settlement demand no later than 20

days prior to the Settlement Con ference and it is further

ORDERED that the parties shall prepare and exchange a list of all medical

records and bills in their possession regarding plaintiff. The parties shall update these

lists as circumstances warrant. Upon request, the parties shall provide any records and

bills on the list to opposing counsel.

United States Judge
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Pilgrim, Appellant.

[851 NYS2d 883]

The defendant’s claim that the County Court should have dismissed the indictment pursuant to CPL 210.20 (1) (h) is unpreserved for appellate review because he failed to move for such relief in the County Court *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Garcia,*33 AD3d 1050 [2006]; *see also People v Gathers,*280 AD2d 554 [2001]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt *565was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]). Lifson, J.P., Ritter, Florio and Garni, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Tsipi Kagan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of RADVision Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d- 15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 15, 2004

/s/Tsipi Kagan*
---------------
Tsipi Kagan
Chief Financial Officer
* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Baoshinn Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, I, Benny Kan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  May 14, 2009 BAOSHINN CORPORATION By:  /s/ Benny Kan Benny Kan  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Baoshinn Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, I, Sean Webster, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  May 14, 2009 BAOSHINN CORPORATION By:  /s/ Sean Webster Sean Webster