alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 22 PageID: 4687
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 2 of 22 PageID: 4688
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 3 of 22 PageID: 4689
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 4 of 22 PageID: 4690
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 5 of 22 PageID: 4691
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 6 of 22 PageID: 4692
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 7 of 22 PageID: 4693
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 8 of 22 PageID: 4694
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 9 of 22 PageID: 4695
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 10 of 22 PageID: 4696
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 11 of 22 PageID: 4697
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 12 of 22 PageID: 4698
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 13 of 22 PageID: 4699
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 14 of 22 PageID: 4700
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 15 of 22 PageID: 4701
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 16 of 22 PageID: 4702
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 17 of 22 PageID: 4703
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 18 of 22 PageID: 4704
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 19 of 22 PageID: 4705
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 20 of 22 PageID: 4706
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 21 of 22 PageID: 4707
Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 265 Filed 01/25/18 Page 22 of 22 PageID: 4708
812259_1B

Zoe E. Jasper (zjasper@ssbb.com)

Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke LLP

33 Wood Avenue South

Iselin, New Jersey

(212) 818-9200

Attorneys for Defendant the University of Oxford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

SHERRIE RUSSELL-BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF 

TRUSTEES; ROBERT H. JERRY, II, in his individual and 

official capacities as Dean of the University of Florida, 

Levin College of Law; THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD; 

THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, LEVIN COLLEGE 

OF LAW,

Defendants.

Civ. A. No. 2:10-cv-04017-SDW-MCA

APPLICATION AND CLERK’S 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE 

REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

APPLICATION is hereby made pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6.1(b) for a Clerk’s 

Order extending by fourteen days the time within which defendant the University of Oxford may 

answer, move or otherwise reply to the Amended Complaint of plaintiff Sherrie Russell-Brown 

(“Plaintiff”), and it is represented that:

1. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint was filed with the United States District 

Court for the District of New Jersey on August 31, 2010. [Docket Entry No. 7.]

2. Plaintiff purported to serve the University of Oxford in the United 

Kingdom via the Electronic Case Filing system. [See Return of Service Executed, Docket No. 8, 

¶ 6.]

3. The time in which the University of Oxford may answer, move or 

otherwise reply currently expires on September 17, 2010. [Docket Entry No. 6.]

Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 9 Filed 09/07/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 117
812259_1B

4. The University of Oxford has not previously sought an extension of time 

to respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. The granting of this application will extend the 

time within which the University of Oxford will answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s 

Amended Complaint through and including Friday, October 1, 2010. 

Dated: September 7, 2010

Respectfully submitted,

SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE LLP

By: /s/ Zoe E. Jasper 

Zoe E. Jasper (zjasper@ssbb.com)

SO ORDERED:

The above application is GRANTED AND ORDERED this ___ day of _________, 2010.

WILLIAM T. WALSH, Clerk

By:______________________

Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 9 Filed 09/07/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 118
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 132 (Monday, July 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16687]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act; Notice of Agency Meeting

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, July 16, 2009.

Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered:
    1. Proposed Rule--Parts 701 and 741 of NCUA's Rules and 
Regulations, National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund Premium and One 
Percent Deposit.
    2. Final Rule--Parts 741, 748 and 749 of NCUA's Rules and 
Regulations, Credit Union Reporting.
    3. Final Rule--Part 707 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Truth in 
Savings Act Disclosures.
    4. Interest Rate Ceiling Determination under Section 107(5) of the 
Federal Credit Union Act.
    5. Reprogramming of NCUA's Operating Budget for 2009.
    6. Insurance Fund Report.

Recess: 11 a.m.

Time and Date: 11:15 a.m., Thursday, July 16, 2009.

Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

Status: Closed.

 Matters To Be Considered: 
    1. Insurance Appeal. Closed pursuant to Exemption (6).
    2. Part 703 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Pilot Program Request, 
Closed pursuant to Exemption (8).
    3. Consideration of Supervisory Activities (7). Closed pursuant to 
some or all of the following: Exemptions (8) and (9)(A)(ii) and 9(B).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Board Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-16687 Filed 7-9-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MinnErgy, LLC (the Company) for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald L. Scherbring, President and Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Ronald L. ScherbringRonald L. Scherbring, President andPrincipal Executive OfficerDated: August 13, 2008
#### Nancy Aponte, Appellant, v Mott Haven Furniture Company, Inc., Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 70]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered April 22, 2004, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff was attacked by a dog while walking on the sidewalk adjacent to a parking lot owned by defendant and leased to a nonparty, denied plaintiffs motion for leave to vacate her default in opposing defendant’s prior motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

While plaintiffs default may have been excusable, she fails to show a meritorious cause of action *(see Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co.,*67 NY2d 138, 141 [1986]). Defendant’s principal testified that while he frequently visited the parking lot, he had never observed any dogs there and had no knowledge of any attacks by dogs that might have been kept there by the tenant. Plaintiff testified that for about a year before the attack, she had observed dogs roaming the parking lot and *541sidewalk in front of it, and going in and out of the shed on the lot, and that several days after the attack, she overheard unidentified persons in a grocery store speak of two other attacks on unidentified victims. This fails to raise an issue of fact as to whether defendant knew of the vicious propensities of the dog that attacked plaintiff *(see Figueroa v Alex Auto Parts & Cars,*278 AD2d 8 [2000]). We reject plaintiffs argument that even if defendant did not know of the vicious nature of the dogs roaming the parking lot, liability could be based on a finding that the dogs were permitted to roam unrestrained in an open area accessible to the sidewalk with defendant’s implied permission *(cf. Vitrella v Rodrigues,*11 AD3d 287 [2004], *lv denied*4 NY3d 706 [2005]). Concur—Andrias, J.E, Marlow, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
June 16,
2009





Isaac M.
Neuberger, Esq.


Neuberger,
Quinn, Gielen, Rubin and Gibber, P.A.


1 South
Street, 27th
Floor


Baltimore,
MD 21202





Re: Board
Service





Dear
Isaac:





Thank you
for your service on our Board of Directors.  Your insight, experience
and guidance have been invaluable to the Company as it transitioned from a
private to a public company.  We appreciate both the seriousness with
which you approached the issues before the Board and the good nature with which
you expressed your opinions and ideas.  As an expression of our
appreciation for your contributions to the Company, we enclose a check for one
year’s director’s fee.





We wish
you continued success and trust that you will remain a friend of the
Company.





Sincerely,


/s/ Barry
Zyskind


Barry
Zyskind
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Green Standard Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2015, I, Sean Webster, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2015, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2015, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 13, 2015

Green Standard Technologies, Inc.



By:/s/ Sean Webster

Sean Webster
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
              PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lawrence Chimerine, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Quarterly Report of Dentalserv.com on Form 10-QSB, for the
quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Dentalserv.com


/s/  Lawrence Chimerine
--------------------------------------
Lawrence Chimerine
President and Chief Executive Officer
Dentalserv.com

November 13, 2007
#### Kevin Corr et al., Appellants, v Jeffrey D. Thacker, Respondent.

[824 NYS2d 15]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered December 22, 2004, which denied *567plaintiffs’ motion for permission to file a note of issue and restore the matter to the trial calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs offered no reasonable excuse for their delay in seeking to restore the instant matter to the trial calendar *(see Almanzar v Rye Ridge Realty Co.,*249 AD2d 128 [1998]). Their assertions of “law office failure” are unavailing since they do not satisfactorily account for their failure to take advantage of the numerous opportunities they were given by the court over a period of nearly 10 years to restore the matter.

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.E, Andrias, Marlow, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1


Page 1 of 1 Page





**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
 
 
 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of TS Electronics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Keith Boyd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and
 
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  ****Date:  October 13, 2004
By:
/s/ *Keith Boyd*Keith BoydChief Financial Officer
 The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.
Case 2:11-cr-00341-SDW Document 17 Filed 02/27/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 36
Case 2:11-cr-00341-SDW Document 17 Filed 02/27/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 37
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 23-50325 

Summary Calendar 

____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Chelsea Adriana Ballesteros-Saiz, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 2:22-CR-501-1 

______________________________ 

Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Chelsea Ballesteros-Saiz has 

moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). BallesterosSaiz has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record. 

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

May 6, 2024 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 23-50325 Document: 69-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/06/2024
No. 23-50325 

2 

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 23-50325 Document: 69-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/06/2024
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

v.

BAHADIR YAHSI,

 

Criminal Action No.: 11-353 (JLL)

ORDER

LINARES, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court Defendant’s motion to dismiss the second

superseding indictment [Docket Entry No. 50]. For the reasons placed on the record on April 2,

2012,

IT IS on this 2 day of April, 2012, nd

ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss the second superseding indictment is

DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

s/ Jose L. Linares 

JOSE L. LINARES

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:10-cv-03984-FSH -PS   Document 15    Filed 09/10/10   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 159

Case 2:10-cv-03984-FSH -PS   Document 15    Filed 09/10/10   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 160
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129511 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129511 COA: 264257 Saginaw CC: 01-019930-FC DERRICK CONWAY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 24, 2005 order of the Court of Appeal s is considered, and it is DE NIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).

s1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2005

Clerk
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Christopher Gilcher, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Seafarer Exploration Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of the Company for the transition period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”):





(1) the “Report” fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:   September 25, 2009.











/s/ Christopher GilcherChristopher GilcherChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
CERTIFICATION OF LINDA BRYSON

I, Linda Bryson, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Quantum Companies,Inc;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

(4) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of the date within 90 days prior to filing date of this
     annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

(5) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

(6) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                                /s/ Linda Bryson
Date: March 25, 2005                         --------------------
                                  Linda Bryson
                                  Sec/Treas/CFO
Exhibit 15.1
 
  Consent of Independent registered public accounting firm
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-127013, 333-141654, 333-155442, 333-155444 and 333-164091) pertaining to the employee stock option plan of RADVISION Ltd. of our reports dated April 26, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of RADVISION Ltd and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of RADVISION Ltd. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009.
  /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer

Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer

A Member of Ernst & Young Global
  Tel-Aviv, Israel
 April 26, 2010
Case 1:11-cv-02283-JEI-AMD   Document 113   Filed 10/09/13   Page 1 of 4 PageID: 839

Case 1:11-cv-02283-JEI-AMD   Document 113   Filed 10/09/13   Page 2 of 4 PageID: 840

Case 1:11-cv-02283-JEI-AMD   Document 113   Filed 10/09/13   Page 3 of 4 PageID: 841

Case 1:11-cv-02283-JEI-AMD   Document 113   Filed 10/09/13   Page 4 of 4 PageID: 842
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Daly, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 474]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), imposed March 12, 2004, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion. Prudenti, EJ., Schmidt, Goldstein, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
AP9 R04-30-92 S:\FormsLib\Civil Bureau\Civil Courts & Post Judgment\Post Trial\Appeal Status Card Revised 01-18-2013

RDATE 7/23/2015

 NOTICE OF APPEALS

ASSIGNMENT OF COURT THE COURT OF APPEALS

TO: 14TH COURT OF APPEALS 

From: Deputy Clerk: PHYLLIS WASHINGTON

 Chris Daniel, District Clerk

Harris County, T E X A S

CAUSE: 2014-68886 

VOLUME PAGE OR IMAGE # 65164160 & 65204107

DUE 8/24/2015 ATTORNEY 24074787

NOTICE OF APPEAL HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO THE 14TH COURT OF APPEALS

DATE JUDGMENT SIGNED: 4/24/2015 

MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL DATE FILED 5/22/2015

REQUEST TRANSCRIPT DATE FILED NONE

NOTICE OF APPEAL DATE FILED 7/21/2015

NUMBER OF DAYS: ( CLERKS RECORD ) 120

FILE ORDERED: YES NO IMAGED FILED: YES NO 

CODES FOR NOTICE OF APPEAL: BC, C, OA

CHRIS DANIEL 

Harris County, District Clerk

By: /s/PHYLLIS WASHINGTON 

 PHYLLIS WASHINGTON , Deputy

BC NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED

BG NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED – GOVERNMENT

C JUDGMENT BEING APPEALED

D - ACCELERATED APPEAL

OA NO CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED

O CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED (W/NOTICE OF APPEAL)

NA AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/24/2015 11:52:45 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk












JURN7 (NSA#) JUSTICE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM JUL 24, 2015(C1) 

INT6510 CIVIL CASE INTAKE OPT: _____ - INT

 GENERAL PARTY INQUIRY PAGE: 1 - 1

 

CASE NUM: 201468886__ PJN> __ TRANS NUM: _________ CURRENT COURT: 189 PUB? _

CASE TYPE: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT CASE STATUS: DISPOSED (FINAL) 

STYLE: SHERIDAN HILLS DEVELOPMENTS L P VS SULLIVAN, MIKE (IN HIS OFFICIAL C

=============================================================================

 **** INACTIVE PARTIES **** 

 PJN PER/CONN COC BAR PERSON NAME PTY ASSOC. ATTY 

 NUM NUMBER STAT 

 _ 00002-0001 DEF 24074787 SULLIVAN, MIKE (IN HIS OFFICIA NAGORSKI, PAT

 _ 00001-0001 PLT 08198500 SHERIDAN HILLS DEVELOPMENTS L GORDON, HAL R

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

==> (2) CONNECTION(S) FOUND 

1=ACTIVE 2=ATY. INQ. 3=ACT.ENTRY 4=ISS. SERV. 5=DOC. INQ. 

6=CASE INQ. 7=BACKWARD 8=FORWARD 9=PTY. ADDR. 10=REFRESH 11=HELP