alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350
 (SECTION
        906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of, Eastern Exploration Company (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending October 31, 2006 as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I,
        Anthony Tai, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
        and
        Director of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
        as
        adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1)
         The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.
 
 Dated:
        February 12, 2007
 
 By: /s/
        Anthony
        Tai
 Anthony
        Tai, President, Chief Executive Officer,
 Chief
        Financial Officer and Director
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

DEC 6, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-12327

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 02-00100 CV-HTW-1

ELAINE WRIGHT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(December 6, 2006)

Before ANDERSON and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and GOLDBERG,* Judge.

________________

*Honorable Richard W. Goldberg, Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by

designation.
2

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument and careful consideration, we conclude that the

judgment of the district court is due to be affirmed for the reasons discussed at oral

argument.

AFFIRMED.
CU Di it U) Di Di Cl) CU <4 C)

Di

H

0 C)

0 Ft it

T

Q

0

H CU Di it it C) CU

H

CU Ft CD

0

0 CD

H

H

U) CU CU C) Di Di Di H- CU CUC Cl)

H I-H Di C) H-I

0 Di Di Di C)

H CU CU

Di CU

H

H CU it

0 CD CD H- Di CU CU

Di CU C) CD CU CU

< -< Di it H- Cl)

CU

H

0 I-H CU CU H- U) C) H- U)

H

CD <4 CU CU U) C) -, 0 it

CD

0 it CU Di it Di CU

H

CD Di Di tj

0 CU

0 Di Di • Di Di CU CU

Di Di C) Di Di U) CU Di

0 it CU CU

it

0 CU it CD CU CU CU it it

Di CD Di

H rj CU it CD Di CD

0

H Di CU CD Di CU U) Di CU it CU Di CU

it CU CU CU it H- CU Di U) CU CD

Di CD CU Di U)

0 H0 CD t-t CU CU

CD Di it Di it Di Di CD Di CU

CU Di

0

0 Di CU Di C) C) Di <4 CU

o CU Di CU Di CD j’

0 CU H- CU

Di CD CU L< CD <4 Di Di

H

it it CU U) FC

H CD Di C) C)

U) CU CU CU CD it

H Di it CU

CD

0 CU Di

0 CD Di C)

O <4 CU it CU Di CU

0

C) CD N) CD Di Di CD

0

Di it C) Di L< Di Di Di CU CD

CU H- CU CU I--k C) CU itDi it CD Di CU H0 U) CU CU

CD Di it Di it C) CU

- CU CD CU CU Di iQ CU Di o CU I--h

CU CU it CU CD CU Di

0

Di CU C) CU CD CU Di Di CU DiCU it

H CD CU Di CD

H it CD CU C) CU

Di Di C) Di it

H CU C) Di

0

it N) Di CD H- C) CU it CU H- Di

CU CD C) C) H- Di CU • CU CU CU .

CU U)

H C) Di CU C)

0 CU CD CU

Di NJ C) CD C) CU C) CUCU CU Di Di

0 Di H-

- C) it CU

H

Di Di • H- Di Di U) CU

0 HI C) C)

CU0 CU Di NJ CU — CU it Di CUCU CU CD • C) CD Di Di C)

H

CD Di it it

H Di CU Di Di it

H Di

CU it CD CU NJ U)

H

0

H U)

H- Di Di H- H- U) CD Di CU 1 0

Di

0 CU Di U) Di H- -< CU CU

H Di

Di Di Di CU U) C)

0 CU CU

CU Di it it Di it Di CU CU CU

—.

0 it Di CU Di H-

— *

C) it it H- Di it it CUDi it U) it U) it CD C) CU CU CU

H- CU CD CU

0 CD CU CD

CU C) Di Di C) CU --- CUDi CD

H Di • CU CD CD

H H- it CU it Di <1

Di U) it . Di

0

CU Di CU CD it

H

Di H-) Di CU Di CD CU U)Di

0 CD —“ U) U) CD

fr-h Di <4 Di C)0 Di H- CD DiDi CU CU CU Di

CU CD -< CU

Case 2:11-cr-00133-DRD Document 50 Filed 09/24/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 245
Ox

HZ

it,CD

(1)

itCDit

CD(1)

Cl)CDH

hiC’jox

H-

<

(1)0rhiHhiU)H- Cli

C)

it0

C)a

CD

C) ito

a

C) CDhi Hit hi

C) hi

C) CD

a iiCD C)hi

0

(1) C)it (1)

CD CDC)

a it(1)

0

c it

HaNJ CDNJ

a

a hiCD CD

Nh

H- it

0)(1)

0

C)

h

CD CDa ií

CD

a C)

k< it

CD

o C)hi ()

CD

0C)

0

CD

0

0

CD

0

o hi

CD itaCDhi

aH

NJ (_)

a

hi

NJ CD

NJ

0

NJ hi

it

it

a

CD

0C)

0

hi

aCDit

0

hi

CD

C) CDC)

C)

CDhi

NJ

NJ

NJNJ

Cli

CDNJNJ

CD

hiitHCD

(I)(1)a

CDNJNJ

(1)

C)aSHit

NJ

Case 2:11-cr-00133-DRD Document 50 Filed 09/24/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 246
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000890

24-JUL-2015

08:35 AM
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| April 15, 2011                          |   |   |                                                        |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    |   |   |                                                        |   |
| /s/ James G. Brakke                     |   |   | /s/ David M. Rainey                                         |   |
| James G. Brakke                         |   |   | David M. Rainey                                             |   |
| Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |   |   | President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |   |
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Piedmont Mining Company, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.






Date:  May
      14, 2008By: Robert M. Shields,
      Jr.Name:  Robert
      M. Shields, Jr.Title:  Chief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Piedmont Mining Company, Inc. and will be
retained by Piedmont Mining Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.












---
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Grace 1,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending August 31, 2006, I, Virginia K.
Sourlis, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

      1.    Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending August
            31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
            for the quarter ending August 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated:  October 12, 2006

Grace 1, Inc.

By: /s/ Virginia K. Sourlis
    ------------------------------
    Chief Executive Officer and
    Chief Financial Officer
#### KENT v. BURWICK.

Civil Action No. 2114.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

Nov. 25, 1942.

Josiah A. Bonchi, of Springfield, Mass., and Abraham A. M. Schweitzer, of Hartford, Conn., for plaintiff.

Burwick & Burwick, of Worcester, Mass., for defendant.

FORD, District Judge.

I think it does not appear from the plaintiff’s complaint and the facts presented to me at the hearing on the defendant’s motion to dismiss that it is a legal certainty the plaintiff cannot recover in an amount sufficient to confer jurisdiction on this court. Consequently, the defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Company, 303 U.S. 283, 288, 289, 58 S.Ct 586, 82 L.Ed. 845.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 28, 2013

s0520 

# Order

Clerk May 28, 2013

146754

ELOUNDA WATTS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 146754

COA: 307686

Genesee CC: 11

- 096706

- NO

CITY OF FLINT,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 17, 2013

judgm ent of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH

, J., would grant leave to appeal.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ALEXANDER S. ORENSHTEYN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________ 

2011-1308

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida in No. 02-CV-60478, Judge 

Adalberto Jordan.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JOSEPH J. ZITO, Zito, tlp, of Washington, DC, argued 

for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was 

EMERSON V. BRIGGS, III. 

DOUGLAS J. KLINE, Goodwin Procter, LLP, of Boston, 

Massachusetts, argued for defendant-appellee. With him 

on the brief were WILLIAM A. MEUNIER; TIMOTHY J.

ROUSSEAU, of New York, New York. 

______________________ 
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit 

Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 

April 11, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
Case 2:11-cv-01994-SDW-MCA Document 135 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1430
EXHIBIT 31.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Peter Sheu certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the small business issuer;  2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;  4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Dated: April 17, 2007 By:  /s/ Peter Sheu Peter Sheu Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2
 MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Primo Water Corporation2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities,
particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent
quarter (the registrants fourth
quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over
financial reporting, which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role
in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 /s/ Mark CastanedaDate: December 7, 2010
    Mark CastanedaChief Financial Officer
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23
- 50490 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Jay L. White,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:22
- CR
- 278 - 1

**_________________________ _____**  Before **Elrod, Oldham,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jay L. White has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). White has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rel evant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 8, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-50490 Document: 39-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/08/2024No. 23
- 50490

2 with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further respo nsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 23-50490 Document: 39-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/08/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5051 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5051

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 7, 2004

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1001 Williams Street in Ignacio, Colorado, as the ``Leonard C. Burch 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1001 
Williams Street in Ignacio, Colorado, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Leonard C. Burch Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Leonard C. Burch Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 6, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5009 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5009

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To extend water contracts between the United States and specific 
 irrigation districts and the City of Helena in Montana, and for other 
                               purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5009

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To extend water contracts between the United States and specific 
 irrigation districts and the City of Helena in Montana, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Montana Water Contracts Extension 
Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF WATER CONTRACTS.

    (a) Authority to Extend.--The Secretary of the Interior may extend 
each of the water contracts listed in subsection (b) until the earlier 
of--
            (1) the expiration of the 2-year period beginning on the 
        date on which the contract would expire but for this section; 
        or
            (2) the date on which a new long-term water contract is 
        executed by the parties to the contract listed in subsection 
        (b).
    (b) Extended Contracts.--The water contracts referred to in 
subsection (a) are the following:
            (1) Contract Number 14-06-600-2078, as amended, for 
        purchase of water between the United States of America and the 
        City of Helena, Montana.
            (2) Contract Number 14-06-600-2079, as amended, between the 
        United States of America and the Helena Valley Irrigation 
        District for water service.
            (3) Contract Number 14-06-600-8734, as amended, between the 
        United States of America and the Toston Irrigation District for 
        water service.
            (4) Contract number 14-06-600-3592, as amended, between the 
        United States and the Clark Canyon Water Supply Company, Inc., 
        for water service and for a supplemental supply.
            (5) Contract number 14-06-600-3593, as amended, between the 
        United States and the East Bench Irrigation District for water 
        service.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```