alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:11-cv-02585-NLH-JS   Document 1-1   Filed 05/05/11   Page 1 of 18 PageID: 5

Case 1:11-cv-02585-NLH-JS   Document 1-1   Filed 05/05/11   Page 2 of 18 PageID: 6

Case 1:11-cv-02585-NLH-JS   Document 1-1   Filed 05/05/11   Page 3 of 18 PageID: 7

Case 1:11-cv-02585-NLH-JS   Document 1-1   Filed 05/05/11   Page 4 of 18 PageID: 8

Case 1:11-cv-02585-NLH-JS   Document 1-1   Filed 05/05/11   Page 5 of 18 PageID: 9

Case 1:11-cv-02585-NLH-JS   Document 1-1   Filed 05/05/11   Page 6 of 18 PageID: 10

Case 1:11-cv-02585-NLH-JS   Document 1-1   Filed 05/05/11   Page 7 of 18 PageID: 11

Case 1:11-cv-02585-NLH-JS   Document 1-1   Filed 05/05/11   Page 8 of 18 PageID: 12

Case 1:11-cv-02585-NLH-JS   Document 1-1   Filed 05/05/11   Page 9 of 18 PageID: 13

Case 1:11-cv-02585-NLH-JS   Document 1-1   Filed 05/05/11   Page 10 of 18 PageID: 14

Case 1:11-cv-02585-NLH-JS   Document 1-1   Filed 05/05/11   Page 11 of 18 PageID: 15

Case 1:11-cv-02585-NLH-JS   Document 1-1   Filed 05/05/11   Page 12 of 18 PageID: 16

Case 1:11-cv-02585-NLH-JS   Document 1-1   Filed 05/05/11   Page 13 of 18 PageID: 17

Case 1:11-cv-02585-NLH-JS   Document 1-1   Filed 05/05/11   Page 14 of 18 PageID: 18

Case 1:11-cv-02585-NLH-JS   Document 1-1   Filed 05/05/11   Page 15 of 18 PageID: 19

Case 1:11-cv-02585-NLH-JS   Document 1-1   Filed 05/05/11   Page 16 of 18 PageID: 20

Case 1:11-cv-02585-NLH-JS   Document 1-1   Filed 05/05/11   Page 17 of 18 PageID: 21

Case 1:11-cv-02585-NLH-JS   Document 1-1   Filed 05/05/11   Page 18 of 18 PageID: 22
**EXHIBIT
23.1**
  
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-45260) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan
and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-45262) pertaining to the 2000
Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-62024) pertaining to the 2001 Supplemental Stock Option Plan and the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-115788) pertaining to the Airspan
Omnibus Equity Compensation plan 2003 Supplemental Stock Option Plan 2000
Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Airspan Networks, Inc. of our reports dated
April 27, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Airspan Networks, Inc., Airspan Networks, Inc.’s management’s
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Airspan
networks Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
 
 */s/
Ernst & Young LLP*
 
 London
England
 April 27,
2005
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Haley, Millette and Se nior Judge Coleman

DENNIS RAY HARRISON MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 0133-08-3 PER CURIAM MAY 13, 2008 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA/ DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINERALS & ENERGY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (D. Allison Mullins; Lee & Phipps, P. C., on brief), for appellant. (Robert F. McDonnell, Attorn ey General; Maureen Riley Matsen, Deputy Attorney General; Deanis L. Simmons, Se nior Assistant Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Dennis Ray Harrison appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that he failed to prove (1) his psychological conditi on is either a compensable occupational disease or a compensable ordinary dis ease of life; and (2) he is totally incapacitated

for all work due to that condition. We have reviewed the record a nd the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. A ccordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Harrison v. Commonwealth of Vi rginia/Dep’t of Mines, Minerals & Energy , VWC File No. 230-97-89 (Dec. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and lega l contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument w ould not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.
| Exhibit 32.1 |
|--------------|

| (1)       | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |   |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     |                                                                                                                                                  |
| (2)       | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |   |
|                     |                                                                                                                                                  |
|                     | Dated this 20th   day of December, 2010                                                                                                     |   |
|                     |                                                                                                                                                  |

|    | “Robert M. Baker”                              |   |
|--------------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|         | Robert M. Baker                                       |
|         | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   |
ME1 13358934v.1 

John E. Flaherty

Partner 

T. 973.639.7903 

F. 973.297.3971 

jflaherty@mccarter.com 

McCarter & English, LLP 

Four Gateway Center 

100 Mulberry Street 

P.O. Box 652 

Newark, NJ 07102 

T. 973.622.4444 

F. 973.624.7070 

www.mccarter.com 

BOSTON

HARTFORD 

NEW YORK 

NEWARK 

PHILADELPHIA 

STAMFORD 

WILMINGTON 

July 6, 2012 

VIA ECF 

Hon. Joel A. Pisano, U.S.D.J 

U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey 

Clarkson S. Fisher Building & U.S. Courthouse 

402 East State Street 

Trenton, New Jersey 08608 

Re: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, et al. v. Mylan Inc. et al.

 Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-02506-JAP-TJB 

Dear Judge Pisano: 

We, along with our co-counsel Hogan Lovells, represent plaintiffs in the above 

action. We write on behalf of all parties to request that the Court schedule a 

Markman hearing to be held on August 23, 2012, or as soon thereafter as the 

Court’s schedule permits. The parties believe that expert testimony will not be 

necessary and respectfully request that the Court reserve a full day for the hearing. 

The parties are available to discuss the Court’s desired approach to the hearing, if 

that would be helpful. 

Respectfully, 

s/John E. Flaherty

John E. Flaherty 

cc: Counsel of Record (via email) 

Case 3:11-cv-02506-JAP-TJB Document 82 Filed 07/06/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1777
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
 Date: November 15, 2010
    By:
    /s/ David R. AllenDavid R. AllenChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 1 1

- 00 607

- CV

IN RE Ronald Dale BENNETT

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 31, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On August 19, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has

considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010

- CI

- 01359 , styled Robert C. Hasslocher and Julie Himoff v. Williams

Brothers Construction Co., Inc., et al.

, pending in the 288th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the

Honorable Solomon J. Casseb, III presiding. However, the Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, presiding judge

of the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, presided over the hearing that resulted in the order

complained of, and the Honorab le John D. Gabriel, presiding judge of the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar

County, Texas, signed the order complained of.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Crim. No. 11-271 (FSH)

v. : O R D E R

MARUK MASOOD :

Defendant. :

This matter having come before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge filed in this matter, which was submitted as a result of this Court having

referred this cause to the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of conducting a plea proceeding under

Fed. R. Crim. P. 11; and the defendant having consented to the Magistrate Judge conducting the

guilty plea proceeding; and the Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as

the transcript of the proceedings on April 21, 2011 and there being no objection to the Report and

Recommendation timely filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b); and the Court finding the Report and

Recommendation is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law; and the Court hereby finding that

the Report and Recommendation should be approved and adopted and the defendant’s guilty plea

accepted,

IT IS ON THIS 2 day of June, 2011, nd

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is

approved and adopted; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant’s guilty plea is accepted and a judgment

of guilt to Count One of the Information shall be entered. 

 s/ Faith S. Hochberg 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:11-cr-00271-FSH Document 60 Filed 06/02/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 69
Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 105 Filed 08/29/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 2021
Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 105 Filed 08/29/12 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 2022
Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 105 Filed 08/29/12 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 2023
Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 105 Filed 08/29/12 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 2024
Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 105 Filed 08/29/12 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 2025
Case 3:11-mj-02520-DEA   Document 10   Filed 09/01/11   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 16

Case 3:11-mj-02520-DEA   Document 10   Filed 09/01/11   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 17
Case 2:11-cr-00080-SDW Document 196 Filed 10/02/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 716
Case 2:11-cr-00080-SDW Document 196 Filed 10/02/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 717
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

DAVID L. WOMACK, :

: Civil No. 11-2884 (JAP)

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : ORDER

:

NEW JERSEY, et al., :

:

Defendants. :

IT APPEARING THAT:

1. On May 20, 2011, Plaintiff David L. Womack, an inmate

confined at New Jersey State Prison, filed this civil action

in forma pauperis, without prepayment of fees or security,

asserting claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

2. The matter was administratively terminated on August 22,

2011 because Plaintiff did not submit the $350.00 filing fee

or an in forma pauperis application as required by 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(a)(1), including a certified copy of his inmate trust

fund account statement(s) for the six-month period

immediately preceding the filing of his complaint as

required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). 

3. On September 23, 2011, the Clerk of the Court received from

Plaintiff an Application and/or Motion for Expedited Relief.

4. On October 3, 2011, the Clerk of the Court received from

Plaintiff an Affidavit of Poverty and Account Certification.

8. Plaintiff had also filed, in the United States Court of

Appeals for the Third Circuit, a Petition for Writ of

Case 3:11-cv-02884-JAP-DEA Document 6 Filed 11/15/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 60
Mandamus. That Petition was denied on November 3, 2011. 

IT IS THEREFORE on this 15th day of November, 2011, 

ORDERED that the Clerk shall reopen the file in order for

this Court to entertain Plaintiff’s application to proceed in

forma pauperis and, if same is granted, to screen the Complaint

for dismissal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A

and/or 42 U.S.C. § 1997e.

S/ Joel A. Pisano 

Joel A. Pisano

United States District Judge

Case 3:11-cv-02884-JAP-DEA Document 6 Filed 11/15/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 61
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 134 (Wednesday, July 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16699]



[[Page 34365]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 10, 2009, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Advanced Media Workflow 
Association Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Florical Systems, Gainesville, FL; StorerTV, Mequon, WI; 
Matt Beard (individual member), Maud, UNITED KINGDOM; and John Luff 
(individual member), Sewickley, PA have been added as parties to this 
venture. Also, Digital Vision, London, UNITED KINGDOM; Nielsen, 
Westport, CT; SecurePath Technology LLC, Los Angeles, CA; and Rick 
Turbeville (individual member), Waynesboro, VA have withdrawn as 
parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Advanced Media Workflow Association 
Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all 
changes in membership.
    On March 28, 2000, Advanced Media Workflow Association Inc. filed 
its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 24, 
2009. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on April 24, 2009 (74 FR 18748).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. E9-16699 Filed 7-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey Jerome, Appellant.

[851 NYS2d 885]

*557The trial court’s determination that the explanations provided by the People for exercising peremptory challenges to four black male venirepersons were not pretextual is supported by the record and will not be disturbed on appeal *(see Batson v Kentucky,*476 US 79 [1986]; *Hernandez v New York,*500 US 352, 359 [1991]; *People v Caraballo,*238 AD2d 517 [1997]). Thus, the defendant’s *Batson*challenge was properly denied. Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Lifson and Ritter, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Grace 4,
      Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ending February 29,
      2008 (the “Report”), I, Virginia K. Sourlis, the Chief Executive Officer and
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: April 3, 2008By:
            /s/ Virginia
              K. SourlisVirginia
                K. Sourlis
              Chief
                Executive Officer and
              Chief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Northeast Mortgage  Corporation
on Form  10-KSB for the  period  ending  December  31,  2002,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Brian
Rogerson, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Brian Rogerson
--------------------------
Brian Rogerson
President
(Principal Executive Officer)


September 18, 2003


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.










                                       19
909 A.2d 284

#### IN THE MATTER OF JAMES J. GALLO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

November 2, 2006.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decisions in DRB 06-256 and DRB 06-098, concluding on the records certified to the Board pursuant to *Rule*1:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that JAMES J. GALLO of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, and who has been suspended from the practice of law since April 21, 2006, by Order of the Court filed on March 24, 2006, should be disciplined by the imposition of two one-year periods of suspension from practice for unethical conduct established in DRB 05-098 and DRB 06-156m including violations of *RPC*1.1(a) (gross neglect), *RPC*1.1(b) (pattern of neglect), *RPC*1.16(d) (failure to take reasonable steps to protect the client’s interests upon termination of representation), and *RPC*8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with reasonable requests for information from a disciplinary authority), and *Rule*1:20-3(g)(3) (duty to cooperate in a disciplinary investigation);

And JAMES J. GALLO having failed to appear on the Order to Show Cause issued in these matters;

And the Court having determined that respondent’s unethical conduct and his history of defaults and failures to appear on the Court’s Orders to Show Cause warrant his disbarment; *In re Kantor,*180 *N.J.*226, 850 A.2d 473 (2004);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAMES J. GALLO be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys;

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

*479ORDERED that JAMES J. GALLO be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of these matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

(609) 989-2040

CHAMBERS OF

TONIANNE J. BONGIOVANNI

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

U.S. COURTHOUSE

402 E. STATE STREET, RM 6052

TRENTON, NJ 08608

September 28, 2012

LETTER ORDER

Re: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, et al. v. Mylan Inc., et al.

Civil Action No. 11-2506 (JAP)

Dear Counsel:

The Court has received Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.’s (“Mylan”) letter dated September 27, 2012

requesting guidance as to the appropriate time to raise with the Court the setting of a trial date. As the

parties are aware, three days ago, the Court entered a Letter Order setting forth the remaining schedule in

this matter. While firm dates were set for all other events, including the Final Pre-Trial Conference which

is scheduled to take place on May 1, 2013 at 11:00 A.M., the specific trial date was left to be set by the

District Court. The Court appreciates that the 30-month stay is set to expire on September 23, 2013. This

Court and the District Court are well aware of that deadline and the ramifications of this matter not being

tried in advance of same. 

As noted above, the Final Pre-Trial Conference is currently scheduled to take place on May 1, 2013

and the parties should be prepared to conduct the trial of this matter immediately thereafter. While the Court

knows that the parties will endeavor to keep to the current schedule set by the Court, the Court is aware that

minor adjustments may have to be made. Consequently, the Court finds that it would be premature at this

juncture, seven months prior to the scheduled Final Pre-Trial Conference, to request a firm trial date from

Case 3:11-cv-02506-JAP-TJB Document 97 Filed 09/28/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1920
the District Court. As the parties should be aware from their involvement in prior cases, this Court shall

keep the District Court apprised of the progress of this matter. The Court expects that in early 2013,

provided the parties adhere to the current schedule, the District Court will set a trial date. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/ Tonianne J. Bongiovanni 

TONIANNE J. BONGIOVANNI 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:11-cv-02506-JAP-TJB Document 97 Filed 09/28/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1921
Case 2:11-cr-00112-SRC Document 27 Filed 08/01/12 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 89
Case 2:11-cr-00112-SRC Document 27 Filed 08/01/12 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 90
Case 2:11-cr-00112-SRC Document 27 Filed 08/01/12 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 91
Case 2:11-cr-00112-SRC Document 27 Filed 08/01/12 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 92
Consumer Price Index, Bureau of Labor Statistics, February 2016

Consumer Price Index: Changes in Seasonal Adjustment Status for 2016

These items are changing to Seasonally Adjusted:

Item code Title

CUUR0000SEFC

CWUR0000SEFC

Beef and veal

CUUR0000SEFC03

CWUR0000SEFC03

Uncooked beef steaks

CUUR0000SEFJ

CWUR0000SEFJ

Dairy and related products

CUUR0000SEHE

CWUR0000SEHE

Fuel oil and other fuels

CUUR0000SERA03

CWUR0000SERA03

Other video equipment

CUUR0000SS09011

CWUR0000SS09011

Fresh whole milk

CUUR0000SS09021

CWUR0000SS09021

Fresh milk other than whole

 
Consumer Price Index, Bureau of Labor Statistics, February 2016

These items are changing to Not Seasonally Adjusted: 

Item code Title

CUUR0000SEEC01 

CWUR0000SEEC01

Postage

CUUR0000SEFB

CWUR0000SEFB

Bakery products

CUUR0000SEFB01 

CWUR0000SEFB01

Bread

CUUR0000SEFD03 

CWUR0000SEFD03

Pork chops

CUUR0000SEFK02 

CWUR0000SEFK02

Bananas

CUUR0000SSFV031A

CWUR0000SSFV031A

Food at elementary and secondary schools