alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.16



 Exhibit 10.16 

 
 



 
 Notice of Grant 
 Babcock & Wilcox Long-Term Incentives 
 [Date] 

TO: [Name] 
 The Company is pleased to
advise that you have been granted long-term incentives as follows: 
  

							
		 	Date of Grant:	  	 	  	
				
		 	Performance Restricted Stock Units Granted:	  	 	  	
				
		 	Restricted Stock Units Granted:	  	 	  	
				
		 	Non Qualified Stock Options Granted:	  	 	  	@                 

 By your signature below, you agree that these incentives are granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of
the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan of The Babcock & Wilcox Company (as amended and restated to date, the “Plan”), and the 2013 B&W Restricted Stock Units, Stock Options and Performance Restricted Stock Units Agreements, which
are attached to and made a part of this document. A copy of the Plan and the Prospectus relating to the stock issued under the Plan can be found at http://equityawardcenter.schwab.com under the “At a Glance/My Company Info” tab in
your Schwab account. The Plan and Prospectus are incorporated by reference and made a part of this document. If you would like to receive a copy of either the Plan or Prospectus, please contact
             at [telephone number] or [email]. 
 Please acknowledge
(1) your receipt and acceptance of this Notice of Grant and accompanying long-term incentives and (2) your agreement with the terms contained in the Grant Agreement governing such long-term incentives, by signing both this Notice and the
enclosed copy hereof and returning one such signed copy to The Babcock & Wilcox Company at The Harris Building, 13024 Ballantyne Corporate Place, Charlotte, NC 28277, Attention: [Name], and marked “Personal and
Confidential.” Your long-term incentives will not be effective until you return a signed copy of this Notice. Please do so no later than 30 days from the date of the Notice. 

 

							
	 	 		 	Date:	  	 
	[Name]
Exhibit 23.1











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-164049 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-141734 Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form SB-2 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 2, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements of China Pharma Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 of China Pharma Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.
   HANSEN, BARNETT & MAXWELL, P.C.
  Salt Lake City, Utah
 March 17, 2011
1

The HONORABLE STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, United States District Judge

for the Eastern District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-3033

___________

Terry Allen Norton, et al., *

*

Plaintiffs - Appellants, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Bob Holden, Governor of the State of *

Missouri, et al., * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Defendants - Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: September 30, 2002

 Filed: November 4, 2002

___________

Before LOKEN, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Terry Norton and four other Missouri inmates and non-inmate taxpayers appeal

the district court’s1

 dismissal of their constitutional and statutory claims challenging

the administration of the Missouri Sexual Offenders Program and the Missouri Drug

Treatment Programs for rehabilitating Missouri inmates. The district court dismissed

the federal civil rights act claims and the state pendent claims without prejudice, and

the Federal qui tam claims with prejudice. Upon careful review of the record, we
-2-

affirm for the reasons stated in the court’s June 28, 2002 Order and Memorandum.

See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

Judge Bye dissents from the dismissal of the Federal qui tam claims.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit  32
Chief  Executive  and  Financial  Officer  Certification  (Section  906)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002),  I,  the  undersigned  President  and Chief
Executive  Officer  of  Global Immune Technologies, Inc., (the "Company"), herby
certify  that,  to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
the  Company  for the period ended March  31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies
with  the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of  1934  and  that  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operation of the
Company.  A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906
has  been provided to the registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.


Dated:  July  23,  2007
                         /s/ Donald  Perks
                         --------------------------------
                         CEO  and  CFO
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Imad Kamel Yassine, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc. for the period ended January 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc..                                                            

|Dated: March 22, 2011 |                                                               
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |                                                               
|                      |                                                               
|                      |                                                               
|                      | Imad Kamel Yassine                                            
|                      | Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, Secretary   
|                      | Treasurer and Director                                        
|                      | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)
|                      | Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc.                               

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
1 The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United St ates District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-2849

___________ George W. Carlisle, Jr., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. City of St. Peters, HR Department, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 23, 2008 Filed: January 7, 2009

___________ Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. George W. Carlisle, Jr., app eals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action. Upon carefulde novo review, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman , 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002), we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted for th e reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Judge Cavanaugh,

I am requesting permission to go on vacation with my family. I have looked into several locations and

contacted their consulate and was told there would be no problem in my visiting their Islands.

1 have listed the contacts below and I have notified my probation officer Ms. Susan Karlak.

Bermuda — Ms. Todd 441-295-5151 ext: 1378

St. Maarten — See attached email

Haiti — Mr. Pierre Lorse 212-697-9767

Dominic Republic — We were there in 2012 for a week Ms. Karlak spoke with Mr. Ramirez for

confirmation. 212-768-2480.

I would appreciate if you could contact Ms. Karlak and let me know so that my family can book a

vacation. I will send Ms. Kariak an Itinerary after we have booked our vacation.

Thankyou in advance, Lj-rJustin Birdsall

Cc Susan Karlak, Senior USPO ‘i1> C Cecch,

I 50 Walnut Street C Cecu, U s : j

Rm. 1005

Newark, NJ
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 132 (Monday, July 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16413]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AA-11153-31; AK-965-1410-KC-P]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 
an appealable decision approving the reserved mineral estate in certain 
lands for conveyance pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement 
Act and Sec. 12(b)(3) of the Act of January 2, 1976, will be issued to 
Cook Inlet Region, Inc. The lands are in the vicinity of Hicks and 
Pinochle Creeks, Alaska, and are located in:

Seward Meridian, Alaska

T. 20 N., R. 9 E.,
    Secs. 16, 19, and 20;
    Secs. 21, 22, and 23;
    Secs. 25 to 30, inclusive;
    Sec. 35.

    Containing 2,995.91 acres.

    Notice of the decision will also be published four times in the 
Anchorage Daily News.

DATES: The time limits for filing an appeal are:
    1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely 
affected by the decision shall have until August 12, 2009 to file an 
appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.
    Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the 
requirements of 43 CFR part 4, subpart E, shall be deemed to have 
waived their rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, <greek-i>13, 
Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Bureau of Land Management by phone 
at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5332387d313f3e7d303c3d25362a323d30361332387d313f3e7d343c25"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bedfd590dcd2d390ddd1d0c8dbc7dfd0dddbfedfd590dcd2d390d9d1c8">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons 
who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, 
seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.

Christy Favorite,
Land Law Examiner, Land Transfer Adjudication II Branch.
[FR Doc. E9-16413 Filed 7-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### MOTT v. CITY OF FLORA et al.

Civil Action No. 625.

District Court, E. D. Illinois.

Jan. 7, 1943.

See, also, 3 F.R.D. 232; 51 F.Supp. 963.

Kramer, Campbell, Costello & Wiechert, of East St. Louis, Ill., and Markman, Donovan & Sullivan, of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

A. J. McMahan, of Olney, Ill., Smith, McCollum & Riggle, of Flora, Ill., and E. Harold Wineland, of Flora, Ill., for defendants. ’

WHAM, District Judge.

This case is before the court upon a motion by the defendant City of Flora to strike *233certain portions of the complaint, namely, paragraphs numbered one, two, three, four, five and six of the prayer of the complaint and upon a motion to dismiss by all defendants other than the City of Flora. The defendants other than the City of Flora are the mayor, commissioners and certain other officials of the City of Flora in their official and individual capacities.

It would appear that the facts set forth in the complaint are sufficient to require an answer by the City of Flora and by the officials and individuals named in the complaint. Getz v. City of Harvey, 7 Cir., 118 F.2d 817; Bank of Burlington v. City of Murphysboro, 7 Cir., 96 F.2d 899; Rothschild v. Village of Calumet Park, 350 Ill. 330, 183 N.E. 337; City of Jacksonville v. Bankers Life Co., 7 Cir., 90 F.2d 141.

If certain relief is sought to which plaintiff may not be entitled after a hearing on the merits, such relief will be' denied as of course.

Though I cannot know what the answer may disclose, but assuming that the allegations of the complaint are true, as I must under the motion to dismiss, it would seem that this is a case that should not require litigation for its proper settlement and disposition in fairness to all parties concerned. I make this comment at this time in view of the fact that it will be my duty under the pretrial procedure, when issues have been completed, to encourage a settlement of the case.

The motion of the City of Flora to strike certain portions of the complaint and the motion of the other defendants to dismiss will be and each is hereby denied.
Exhibit 21.  Securities of Registrant

|Name of Subsidiary                                                                                   | Jurisdictionof Incorporation | Year
Acquiredof Formed | Percentage
of VotingSecurities Owned
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------- | ---------------------- | ------------------------------------
|ASI Data Services Inc                                                                                | Maine                        | 1993                   | 100%                                
|Northeast Savings Bank, F.S.B. (and its 100% owned subsidiary, Northeast Bank Insurance Group, Inc.) | Maine                        | 1987                   | 100%                                
|NBN Capital Trust                                                                                    | Delaware                     | 1999                   | 100%                                
|NBN Capital Trust II                                                                                 | Delaware                     | 2003                   | 100%                                
|NBN Capital Trust III                                                                                | Delaware                     | 2003                   | 100%                                
|NBN Capital Trust IV                                                                                 | Delaware                     | 2004                   | 100%
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1047 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to create a dependency and indemnity 

compensation allowance for surviving spouses receiving dependency and 

indemnity compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 4, 2019 

Mr. TESTER (for himself, Ms. HIRONO, and Mr. BLUMENTHAL) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to create a dependency and indemnity compensation allowance for surviving 

spouses receiving dependency and indemnity compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dependency and In5 demnity Compensation Improvement Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1047 IS

1 SEC. 2. DEPENDENCY AND INDEMNITY COMPENSATION AL2 LOWANCE FOR SURVIVING SPOUSES RECEIV3 ING DEPENDENCY AND INDEMNITY COM4 PENSATION FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF 

5 VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

6 (a) ALLOWANCE.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 13 

8 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by in9 serting after section 1311 the following new section: 

10 ‘‘§ 1311A. Dependency and indemnity compensation 

11 allowance for surviving spouses 

12 ‘‘A dependency and indemnity compensation allow13 ance shall be paid to a surviving spouse who is entitled 

14 to receive dependency and indemnity compensation under 

15 section 1311(a) of this title at the monthly rate equal to 

16 the amount by which— 

17 ‘‘(1) the amount that is 55 percent of the rate 

18 of monthly compensation in effect under section 

19 1114(j) of this title, exceeds 

20 ‘‘(2) the amount of dependency and indemnity 

21 compensation the surviving spouse is entitled to re22 ceive under section 1311(a) of this title.’’. 

23 (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sec24 tions at the beginning of chapter 13 of such title is 

25 amended by inserting after the item relating to sec26 tion 1311 the following new item: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1047 IS

‘‘1311A. Dependency and indemnity compensation allowance for surviving 

spouses.’’. 

1 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in section 

2 1311A of such title, as added by subsection (a)(1), shall 

3 be construed to have an effect on any amount of payment 

4 under section 1450 of title 10, United States Code. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOT A

2021 ND 6 9

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v. Douglas Landis, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20200323

Appeal from the District Court of Mountrail County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Richard L. Hagar , Judge.

AFFIRMED

. Per Curiam

. Wade G. Enget, State’s Attorney, Stanley, N

. D ., for plaintiff and appellee.

Kiara C. Kraus

- Parr, Grand Forks, N

. D ., for defendant and appellant.1 State v. Landi s No. 20200323
Per Curiam

. [¶1] Douglas Landis appeals a district court criminal judgment following a jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts of negligent homicide. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)( 3 ).
[¶2] In the early morning hours of October 5, 2018, Landis was involved in a head

- on collision that resulted in the death of two individuals. Landis’s time card from the day prior stated that he had started work at 2:00 a.m. and ended work at 2:00 p.m. B usiness records, including bills of lading, showed that Landis continued to pick up and deliver frac

- sand past 2:00 p.m. These records showed that Landis had been working 24 out of 28 and 1/2 hours prior to the crash

. Trooper Preston Langer responded to the scene of the crash and testified that the further east he traveled, the conditions appeared to be deteriorating, with snow beginning to accumulate on the roadway. The S tate presented dash camera audio and video of a conversation that occurred between Trooper La nger and Landis, with Landis admitting that he could not see the center line and felt the truck drifting into the oncoming lane. Trooper Christa Kovarik testified as an expert for purposes of crash reconstruction and gave her opinion that the point of impa ct was delineated by gouge marks on the pavement located on the fog line of the eastbound lane. At the close of the State’s case, Landis moved under Rule 29, N.D.R.Crim.P., for a judgment of acquittal. The district court denied the motion.
[¶3] On appeal, Landi s argues the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal. We conclude that the verdict is supported by substantial evidence, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)( 3 ).
[¶4] Jon J. Jensen, C.J

. Gerald W. VandeWall e Daniel J. Crother s Lisa Fair McEver s Jerod E. Tuft e
Case 2:11-cv-01566-ES-CLW Document 3 Filed 09/09/11 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 59
Case 2:11-cv-01566-ES-CLW Document 3 Filed 09/09/11 Page 2 of 14 PageID: 60
Case 2:11-cv-01566-ES-CLW Document 3 Filed 09/09/11 Page 3 of 14 PageID: 61
Case 2:11-cv-01566-ES-CLW Document 3 Filed 09/09/11 Page 4 of 14 PageID: 62
Case 2:11-cv-01566-ES-CLW Document 3 Filed 09/09/11 Page 5 of 14 PageID: 63
Case 2:11-cv-01566-ES-CLW Document 3 Filed 09/09/11 Page 6 of 14 PageID: 64
Case 2:11-cv-01566-ES-CLW Document 3 Filed 09/09/11 Page 7 of 14 PageID: 65
Case 2:11-cv-01566-ES-CLW Document 3 Filed 09/09/11 Page 8 of 14 PageID: 66
Case 2:11-cv-01566-ES-CLW Document 3 Filed 09/09/11 Page 9 of 14 PageID: 67
Case 2:11-cv-01566-ES-CLW Document 3 Filed 09/09/11 Page 10 of 14 PageID: 68
Case 2:11-cv-01566-ES-CLW Document 3 Filed 09/09/11 Page 11 of 14 PageID: 69
Case 2:11-cv-01566-ES-CLW Document 3 Filed 09/09/11 Page 12 of 14 PageID: 70
Case 2:11-cv-01566-ES-CLW Document 3 Filed 09/09/11 Page 13 of 14 PageID: 71
Case 2:11-cv-01566-ES-CLW Document 3 Filed 09/09/11 Page 14 of 14 PageID: 72