Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
 AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HHS.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This notice announces the intention of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approve the proposed information collection under the project: “Evaluation of AHRQ's Effective Health Care Program.” In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), AHRQ invites the public to comment on this proposed information collection. This proposed information collection was previously published in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         on April 24th, 2009 and allowed 60 days for public comment. No comments were received. The purpose of this notice is to allow an additional 30 days for public comment.
 DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by August 13, 2009.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted to: AHRQs OMB Desk Officer by fax at (202) 395-6974 (
                        *attention:*
                         AHRQ's desk officer) or by e-mail at 
                        *OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov*
                         (
                        *attention:*
                         AHRQ's desk officer). Copies of the proposed collection plans, data collection instruments, and specific details on the estimated burden can be obtained from the AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer, (301) 427-1477, or by e-mail at 
                        *doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.*


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposed Project ”Evaluation of AHRQ's Effective Health Care Program” AHRQ proposes to perform an evaluation of the Effective Health Care (EHC) programs' governance structure, methods for engaging stakeholders and approaches to setting national research priorities. Pursuant to Section 1013 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, Public Law 108-173, the EHC program was established by AHRQ to conduct research, demonstrations, and evaluations designed to improve the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of Medicare, Medicaid, and the State Children's Health Insurance Program. The EHC program was designed to provide effectiveness and comparative effectiveness evidence of medical treatments, therapeutics, devices and drugs to assist policymakers, health care providers, clinicians, consumers, and other stakeholders in making informed decisions. The EHC program has offered a platform for combining explicit reviews of scientific evidence on the clinical effectiveness of pharmaceuticals and other health care interventions, as well as the translation and dissemination of scientific findings into meaningfui messages for a wide variety of audiences. It serves as an interface between the clinical research entities and health policy making entities. This program also provides a critical step in AHRQ's mission to support informed decision making. In addition to its program staff, the EHC program relies on four centers to generate and disseminate evidence: The Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPCs), the Developing Evidence to Inform Decisions about Effectiveness (DEcIDE) Network Centers, the John M. Eisenberg Clinical Decisions and Communications Science Center, and the Centers for Education & Research on Therapeutics (CERTs). Since the process of developing and disseminating this evidence is a complex undertaking, AHRQ has contracted with IMPAQ International, LLC and Abt Associates, Inc. (henceforth referred to as the “IMPAQ team”) to perform this evaluation. Information will be collected to identify strengths and weaknesses in the current EHC program's governance structure, methods for engaging stakeholders, and approaches to setting priorities for the research conducted by the EHC program. The second phase of the evaluation will be to contrast the EHC program with international programs of similar purpose. To implement this evaluation, the IMPAQ team will conduct the following information collections: (1) Key informant interviews about the governance structure of the EHC program; (2) An online survey of EHC center staff and EHC program users and stakeholders; 
                    ( print page 34020) (3) An Appreciative Inquiry workshop with EHC program staff and stakeholders; (4) A document review (will not impose a burden on research participants) and (5) Interviews with staff at international organizations of similar purpose (will not impose a burden on U.S. citizens). The latter two activities do not require OMB approval and are not discussed further in this notice. The information collected will ultimately be used to develop a roadmap, including at least three alternative models of governance and operation, to be submitted to AHRQ that could be used to help guide future programmatic development. Method of Data Collection Key Informant Interviews Semi-structured key informant interviews will be used to understand the EHC program's governance components and structure, from the vantage point of individuals governing the program, governed by the program, contributing to the program in various capacities, or impacted by the program's activities. Thirteen EHC Research Centers Staff, two EHC Stakeholder Group Members, and nineteen EHC Program Users and Stakeholders will be interviewed about the governance structure of the EHC program. Additional key informant interviews with twenty five EHC Program Users and Stakeholders will be used to collect more detailed information on the success or impact of the EHC program product that results from its governance element or approach, or about a specific, important governance element. All key informant interviews will be tape recorded to improve data capture, with prior permission from the participants. Online Survey A structured, web-based online survey of EHC program Research Centers Staff and EHC program Users and Stakeholders will be used to gather information about the EHC program. The survey will provide a robust view of the EHC governance system by providing feedback from a broad group of individuals whose work is related to the program. Specifically, the survey will collect data about these individuals' engagement and involvement with the EHC program; perceptions of the program's governance; experiences with the development, production, dissemination, and use of EHC products; and their beliefs regarding the quality and nature of the collaborative work, including public-private partnerships, being done within centers, across centers, and between centers and stakeholders. Appreciative Inquiry Workshop Small- and large-group discussions as part of an Appreciative Inquiry workshop will be designed to encourage EHC decision-makers (AHRQ staff, EHC program staff, AHRQ project officers for each of the Research Center networks, principal investigators or other representatives from each of the Research Center network) and key program stakeholders or uers to consider anddecide which are the preferred alternative governance models or elements for which roadmaps should be developed. Appreciative Inquiry (AI) approach is an organizational development process that engages individuals within an organization in renewal, change, and focused performance. The AI approach focuses on successes and opportunities to improve things by looking forward, rather than looking back on the problems or issues. The AI workshop is expected to facilitate consensus among decision-makers to contribute to the endorsement of the roadmap(s), and to encourage utilization of the evaluation findings. The workshop will involve a creative thinking process that will build on existing successes, identify and rank preferred alternatives, and ultimately develop a plan to strengthen the EHC program's governance system. Estimated Annual Respondent Burden Exhibit 1 shows the estimated annualized burden hours for the respondents to participate in this evaluation. Key informant interviews will be conducted about the governance structure of the EHC program and will last about one hour. The online survey will be completed by 95 EHC program Research Centers Staff and 170 EHC Program Users and Stakeholders and will require about 15 minutes to complete. The Appreciative Inquiry workshop will be conducted with 20 participants and will last about 6 hours. The total burden hours are estimated to be 246 hours. Exhibit 2 shows the estimated annualized cost burden based on the respondents' time to participate in the evaluation. The total cost burden is estimated to be $12,297. Exhibit 1—Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
Activity name
Number of 
                             respondents
Number of 
                             responses  
                             per  
                             respondent
Hours per 
                             response
Total burden 
                             hoursKey Informant Interviews with EHC Research Centers Staff
13
1
1
13Online Survey with EHC Research Centers Staff
95
1
15/60
24Key Informant Interviews with EHC Stakeholder Group Members
2
1
1
2Key Informant Interviews with EHC Program Users and Stakeholders
19
1
1
19Online Survey with EHC Program Users and Stakeholders
170
1
15/60
43Key Informant Interviews with EHC Program Users and Stakeholders to Develop Cases
25
1
1
25Appreciative Inquiry Workshop
20
1
6
120Total
344
na
na
246
 Exhibit 2—Estimated Annualized Cost Burden
Activity name
Number of 
                             respondents
Total burden hours
Average 
                             hourly  
                             wage rate*
Total cost 
                             burdenKey Informant Interviews with EHC Research Centers Staff
13
13
$54.27
$706Online Survey with EHC Research Centers Staff
95
24
54.27
1,302( print page 34021)Key Informant Interviews with EHC Stakeholder Group Members
2
2
43.52
87Key Informant Interviews with EHC Program Users and Stakeholders
19
19
46.73
888Online Survey with EHC Program Users and Stakeholders
170
43
46.73
2,009Key Informant Interviews with EHC Program Users and Stakeholders to Develop Cases
25
25
46.73
1,168Appreciative Inquiry Workshop
20
120
51.14
6,137Total
344
246
na
12,297* Wage rates were calculated using the following data: (1) For the Governance Interviews and the Online Survey with EHC Research Centers Staff the hourly rate is a weighted average for physicians ($58.76 per hour) and medical and health services managers ($37.82); (2) for the Governance Interviews with EHC Stakeholder Group Members the hourly rate is the rate for average for medical and health services managers ($37.82); (3) for the Governance Interviews and the Online Survey with EHC Program Users and Stakeholders the hourly rate is a weighted average for physicians ($58.76 per hour), general and operations managers ($43.52 per hour), medical and health services managers ($37.82 per hour), and social and community service managers ($24.73 per hour); (4) for the Workshop the hourly rate is a weighted average for physicians ($58.76 per hour) and general and operations managers ($43.52 per hour) from the mean of the average wages, National Compensation Survey: Occupational Wages in the United States 2006, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
 Estimated Annual Costs to the Federal Government Exhibit 3 shows the estimated cost of this one year data collection for the evaluation of the EHC program, including the cost of developing the methodology and data collection instruments, collecting and analyzing the data, publishing the results, etc. The work will be carried out by IMPAQ International and Abt Associates under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Exhibit 3—Estimated Annual Cost to the Federal Government
Cost component
Total costProject Development
$137,901Data Collection Activities
179,172Data Processing and Analysis
170,577Publication of Results
63,686Project Management
97,236Total
648,572* Please note the costs include fully loaded costs (overhead, G&A).
 Request for Comments In accordance with the above-cited Paperwork Reduction Act legislation, comments on AHRQ's information collection are requested with regard to any of the following: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of AHRQ health care research and health care information dissemination functions, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of AHRQ's estimate of burden (including hours and costs) of the proposed collection(s) of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information upon the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and included in the Agency's subsequent request for OMB approval of the proposed information collection. All comments will become a matter of public record. Dated: July 2, 2009. Carolyn M. Clancy, Director.


[FR Doc. E9-16568 Filed 7-13-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160-90-M