alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 21

                                  WELLMAN, INC.
                                  SUBSIDIARIES


ALG, Inc.
Carpet Recycling of Georgia, Inc.
CKB, Co.
DRS Holdings NV
FIISB, Inc.
Fiber Industries, Inc.
Fibres Finance BV
GuardWell Insurance Company
JCT, Ltd.
Josdav, Inc.
KRP, Ltd.
Materials Recovery of California, Inc.
MED Resins, Inc.
Middlewich Limited
MJR Recycling BV
MRF, Inc.
PermaClear East, Inc.
Prince, Inc.
Resins Finance BV
RGB Co.
Shobara Company
TMD, Co.
Warehouse Associates, Inc.
Wellman BV
Wellman Exports V.I., Inc.
Wellman Fibers, Ltd.
Wellman Finance CV
Wellman France Recyclage SARL
Wellman International Handelsgesellsch GmbH
Wellman International Investments
Wellman International Limited
Wellman International Trading
Wellman of Mississippi, Inc.
Wellman PAC
Wellman PET Resins Europe BV
Wellman Resins LLC
Wellman Receivables Company LLC
Wellman Scholarships Foundation, Inc.
Wellman UK Holdings, Ltd.
Wellman Voluntary Employees Benefit Association

New Companies
-------------
MAC IBC Ltd.
KHL, Inc.
Finwell, Inc.
PTA Resources LLC
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of PackItGreen Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Jackson, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: June 5, 2008By:/s/Richard W.  JacksonRichard W. Jackson
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Airspan Networks, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Eric Stonestrom, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Eric Stonestrom Eric Stonestrom Chief Executive
Officer March 30, 2004

---
#### In the Matter of Arthur Lomando, Appellant, v Raymond W. Kelly, as Police Commissioner of the New York City Police Department, et al., Respondents.

[822 NYS2d 535]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered September 1, 2005, which denied the petition, brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, seeking to annul respondents’ determination terminating petitioner’s employment and dismissed this proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There was reason to terminate petitioner, a probationary employee, for making false and misleading statements to Police Department psychologists and to a ranking officer. Petitioner failed to establish that he was terminated in bad faith to frustrate his application for a disability pension *(see Matter of*
      *511
      *Lingard v Kerik,*303 AD2d 286 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 507 [2003]; *Averys v Kelly,*214 AD2d 309 [1995], *lv denied*86 NY2d 703 [1995]). Respondents extensively investigated the charges of misconduct against petitioner and terminated him only after concluding that the charges were substantiated. That petitioner was terminated after approval of his application by the Police Pension Fund Medical Board does not establish bad faith where respondents’ investigation was not completed until after the Medical Board’s determination. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Friedman, Nardelli, Williams and Malone, JJ.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00040-CR

Billy Ray Day Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

66th District Court of Hill County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 36,868

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 23, 2015
#### Tishman Westwide Construction LLC et al., Appellants, v ASF Glass, Inc., Defendant, and RLI Insurance Company, Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 71]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered on or about June 2, 2005, which granted defendant surety’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it and denied plaintiffs’ cross motion for partial summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The conditions of the bond with which plaintiff owner failed to comply went directly to the surety’s liability, and required strict compliance *(see 120 Greenwich Dev. Assoc., LLC v Reliance Ins. Co.,*2004 WL 1277998, *11-13, 2004 US Dist LEXIS 10514, *33-37 [SD NY 2004]; *see also Northeast Constr. Group, Inc. v Deconstruction, Inc.,*16 AD3d 357 [2005], *lv denied*5 *540NY3d 709 [2005]). Similarly, RLI was discharged from its liability on its surety bond because plaintiff materially breached its contractual duties to RLI by failing to provide RLI with the opportunity to exercise its options under paragraph 4 of the bond and with a 15-day notice to cure under paragraph 5 *(see Seaboard Sur. Co. v Town of Greenfield, ex rel. Greenfield Middle School Bldg. Comm.,*370 F3d 215, 224 [1st Cir 2004]). Upon our own review of the record, we reject plaintiffs’ argument that the surety waived the foregoing provisions by taking over the work; it merely provided financing *(see United States ex rel. Maris Equip. Co., Inc. v Morganti, Inc.,*163 F Supp 2d 174, 194-195 [ED NY 2001], *affd on judgment*67 Fed Appx 68 [2d Cir 2003]). The judgment in favor of the surety for indemnification against the contractor on the bond does not establish the surety’s liability to plaintiffs *(see International Fid. Ins. Co. v Spadafina,*192 AD2d 637 [1993]).

We have considered plaintiffs’ other contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Andrias, J.E, Marlow, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
### fie. 

### I/O TttL | COUdl Of C(HA(VhL ftPPibLS COURThenHMwai APPEALS 

### AKS7//1/, TX JUL 1/ " 

### ECE1VED M

(K15T/V7C OF ?**"*$ AbatAooslB.Cierfc 

## RECEIVED IN. Hn/\APfiiAL Mb. i^-lH-oonx-c^ JUL 17 2015 -tati\L ctw^ no, li-til 13^ 

### ^^jotg^giT/o/^^gy '/?s<//&0 * JUL 22.2S:5 tj> -T/fC uom&miC -zuQCts of -7/+-Lcou&7 op- c/wntA/AL Aflpc&& Acosta, Cierk ca/vtc* /Uft/O, sohu ttjiATrKQJM^PttcriMke-, frwo net* -rms /ndf/cA/ Foft A(Sae£T/dA/A& (LUliu), J7/J 5ufifat7 or 7rttS /no-rto/J ftPfUoH/7' S~/M^i X c&lATM. IVtMer Tfr£ oFfCA/St OF /Afi&stSMafrfctALic jf&/AWT ia/ tz4*st &<rUUa of fztAS. Tffi ctet krts fifweaicOov zraat shots'. JUT*. 

### Tin mrtfr7~ C&CUAtt. OF F/LWC P0£ /* A«L.4C%a,lt>gr. Pz-rrr*** U-frt /J07 &L.QKtSTlA 4-vY £rrU)S(0(J fafOfl. <*6 T*fS £HG>ufST , JTT> 

### tntnuJ* um tier MFttotf ofa«1 of t** vmiu/vs MyLuT ^ sU6:rtcr AA/O CAtmVIrt CF 0\/llO7 fifPTAL. XVISHlOVl Cdt/SHLJZfi CP/l £0AS7<te7Ca ,*/*** 

### mdiOA/6FT/K Cr&MAfte faA. ptfiPUL. -r#f#CF(KLjuMc oP ^t £0/U70Ur or Me* JT 063SC7SA TO A545 MOU/M M7*LAFPIAC tf6W?S-7#a;, FILED IN
Exhibit 32


Page 1 of 1 Page


**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
 
 
 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of TS Electronics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Keith Boyd, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and
 
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 ****Date: October 13, 2004
By:
/s/ *Keith Boyd*Keith BoydChairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
 The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.
Case 1:11-cv-00512-RBK-JS   Document 1   Filed 01/28/11   Page 1 of 19 PageID: 1

Case 1:11-cv-00512-RBK-JS   Document 1   Filed 01/28/11   Page 2 of 19 PageID: 2

Case 1:11-cv-00512-RBK-JS   Document 1   Filed 01/28/11   Page 3 of 19 PageID: 3

Case 1:11-cv-00512-RBK-JS   Document 1   Filed 01/28/11   Page 4 of 19 PageID: 4

Case 1:11-cv-00512-RBK-JS   Document 1   Filed 01/28/11   Page 5 of 19 PageID: 5

Case 1:11-cv-00512-RBK-JS   Document 1   Filed 01/28/11   Page 6 of 19 PageID: 6

Case 1:11-cv-00512-RBK-JS   Document 1   Filed 01/28/11   Page 7 of 19 PageID: 7

Case 1:11-cv-00512-RBK-JS   Document 1   Filed 01/28/11   Page 8 of 19 PageID: 8

Case 1:11-cv-00512-RBK-JS   Document 1   Filed 01/28/11   Page 9 of 19 PageID: 9

Case 1:11-cv-00512-RBK-JS   Document 1   Filed 01/28/11   Page 10 of 19 PageID: 10

Case 1:11-cv-00512-RBK-JS   Document 1   Filed 01/28/11   Page 11 of 19 PageID: 11

Case 1:11-cv-00512-RBK-JS   Document 1   Filed 01/28/11   Page 12 of 19 PageID: 12

Case 1:11-cv-00512-RBK-JS   Document 1   Filed 01/28/11   Page 13 of 19 PageID: 13

Case 1:11-cv-00512-RBK-JS   Document 1   Filed 01/28/11   Page 14 of 19 PageID: 14

Case 1:11-cv-00512-RBK-JS   Document 1   Filed 01/28/11   Page 15 of 19 PageID: 15

Case 1:11-cv-00512-RBK-JS   Document 1   Filed 01/28/11   Page 16 of 19 PageID: 16

Case 1:11-cv-00512-RBK-JS   Document 1   Filed 01/28/11   Page 17 of 19 PageID: 17

Case 1:11-cv-00512-RBK-JS   Document 1   Filed 01/28/11   Page 18 of 19 PageID: 18

Case 1:11-cv-00512-RBK-JS   Document 1   Filed 01/28/11   Page 19 of 19 PageID: 19
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 32616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16122]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, July 20, 2009, 8:30 a.m. to 
July 21, 2009, 5 p.m., Ritz Carlton Hotel, 1150 22nd Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20037 which was published in the Federal Register on 
June 26, 2009, 74 FR 30597-30598.
    The meeting will be held at the Melrose Hotel, 2430 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20037. The meeting dates and time remain 
the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: June 30, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-16122 Filed 7-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-13-01060-CV

LINDA J. STAFFORD, Appellant

V.

CHARLES RAY STAFFORD, Appellee

Appeal from the 309th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2000-13812).

TO THE 309TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 14th day of May 2015, the case upon appeal to revise or 

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed 

by the trial court on November 13, 2013. After submitting 

the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly 

raised by the parties, the Court holds that there was reversible 

error in the trial court’s judgment. Accordingly, the Court 

reverses the trial court’s judgment and remands the case to 

the trial court for further proceedings consistent with our 

opinion.

The Court orders that the appellee, Charles Ray 

Stafford, pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.
Judgment rendered May 14, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Huddle.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court 

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

July 24, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
Case 2:11-cv-01470-FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 08/31/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 126
Case 2:11-cv-01470-FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 08/31/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 127
**Exhibit23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Sciele Pharma,Inc. (formerly known as First Horizon Pharmaceutical Corporation) (the “Company”)Nos. 333-129712, 333-117943, 333-108451, 333-89624, 333-40856 and 333-39106 onForm S-8 and in Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-132077 onForm S-4 of our report dated March 11, 2005, relating to the consolidated statementsof operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of the Company for the yearended December 31, 2004 and the consolidated financial statement scheduleof the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, appearingin the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December31, 2006 and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in theProspectus, which is part of the Registration Statement No. 333-132077 onForm S-4.
| /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |
|                          |
| Atlanta, Georgia              |
| February 27, 2007             |

 

----
CERTIFICATION








The
undersigned, Charlie Lee, Principal Financial Officer of Pure Pharmaceuticals
Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
      December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934(15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated: 
March 5, 2008








/s/ Charlie
Lee


Charlie Lee


Principal Financial
Officer











_____________________________





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30016 Conference Calendar

BILLIE DEAN HOLIWAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOEY DAVIDSON; ROLAND T. KAY; MIKE WORLEY; PAUL BLUNSCHI; DAVID BUFFINGTON; BILLY JORDAN; JOE DAVIS; GLEN SPRINGFIELD; ROYCE TONEY, Defendants-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-1665-M

- - - - - - - - - - April 19, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Billie Dean Holiway appeals the dismissal of his civil rights action as frivolous. Holiway contends that he was deprived of property without due process and that police violated his Fourth Amendment rights when they seized his property. We have reviewed the record and Holiway’s brief and we find that Holiway’s due process contention is frivolous for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge and relied upon by theNo. 96-30016 - 2 - district court. See Holiway v. Davidson, No. 95-CV-1665-M (W.D. La. Nov. 16, 1995)(magistrate judge’s report). Resolution of Holiway’s Fourth Amendment contention, raised for the first time on appeal, would require us to make factual determinations initially on appeal. Holiway has failed to present us with a basis for finding that the district court plainly erred because it found no Fourth Amendment violation. See Highlands Ins. Co. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. , 27 F.3d 1027, 1032 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 903 (1995). We caution Holiway that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Holiway is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this court. APPEAL DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRAHEEM KAMEIL BIVENS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 106 MM 2014

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8 th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Leave to File Petition

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED . Although counsel was negligent,

Petitioner is entitled to a counsel-filed Petition for Allowance of Appeal. See

Pa.R.Crim.P. 904. Counsel is directed to file a Pe tition for Allowance of Appeal within

15 days of this order.

Mr. Justice Stevens notes his dissent and would dir ect negligent counsel to file a

Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 48 hours of this order.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF THE

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard Reincke, the CEO and CFO of First Responder Products Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of First Responder Products Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of First Responder Products Inc.

|                    |  |                                                              
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 23, 2008 |  | /s/ Richard Reincke                                          
|                    |  | Richard Reincke                                              
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer/President and
Chief Financial Officer
|                    |  |
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 12

- 00199

- CV

GRADY DOWELL v. GRACIE QUIROZ, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF MARIO GONZALEZ LIRA, NOE LIRA; MARIA ANGELES LIRA; MARLINY GUTIERREZ, ANNETTE GUTIERREZ, NANCY GUTIERREZ, AND DAVID GUTIERREZ

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No

. 2 of Cameron County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 2006

- CPC

- 92

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, vacates the trial court’s judgment of March 8, 2012 and dismisses the case. The C ourt orders the judgment vacated and the case is DISMISSED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against the party incurring them

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 2, 2015.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Exploration Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Warren Robb,
President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of
Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and






(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




















/s/
Warren Robb


Warren
Robb


Chief
Executive Officer






July 14,
2009









CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Exploration Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Warren Robb, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.










/s/
Warren Robb


Warren
Robb


Chief
Financial Officer






July 14,
2009
Case 3:11-cv-00890-MLC-LHG Document 62 Filed 12/17/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 379
Case 2:11-cr-00208-SRC Document 1 Filed 03/04/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1
Case 2:11-cr-00208-SRC Document 1 Filed 03/04/11 Page 2 of 6 PageID: 2
Case 2:11-cr-00208-SRC Document 1 Filed 03/04/11 Page 3 of 6 PageID: 3
Case 2:11-cr-00208-SRC Document 1 Filed 03/04/11 Page 4 of 6 PageID: 4
Case 2:11-cr-00208-SRC Document 1 Filed 03/04/11 Page 5 of 6 PageID: 5
Case 2:11-cr-00208-SRC Document 1 Filed 03/04/11 Page 6 of 6 PageID: 6