alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Crescendo Capital Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ending February 29, 2007, I, Anthony E. Lombardo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending February 29, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending February 29, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  March 21, 2008 Crescendo Capital Corp. By:  /s/ Anthony E. Lombardo Anthony E. Lombardo  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Crescendo Capital Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ending February 29, 2008, I, Margaret L. Sollish, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending February 29, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending February 29, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  March 21, 2008 Crescendo Capital Corp. By:  /s/ Margaret L. Sollish Margaret L. Sollish
Case 2:10-cr-00436-KSH Document 26 Filed 05/09/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 63
Case 2:10-cr-00436-KSH Document 26 Filed 05/09/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 64
(SRC)

SIXING LIU ORDER FOL CONTINUANCE

This matter having come before the Court on the joint

application of Paul .7. Fishman, United States Attorney for the

District of New Jersey (I,. Judson We.Lle, Assistant U.S. Attorney,

appearing), and defendant Sixing Liu (Valerie Y. C. Wong, Esq.,

appearing), for an order granting a con.iriuance of tte

proceedings in the above-captioned matter, and no continuances

having previously been granted by the Court pursuant to Title 18,

United States Code, Section 3161(h) Cl) (A), and the defendant

being aware that he has a right to havn ‘the matter brought to

trial within 70 days of the date of his appearance before a

judicial officer of this court pursuant to Title 18 of the United

States Code, Section 3161(c) (1), and the defendant having

consented to the continuance and waived such right to the extent

of the continuance appearing below, and !or good cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should

be continued for the following reasons:

(1) Counsel for the government and the defendant have

conferred regarding discovery that will be provided pursuant to

this Court’s April 14, 2011, Standing Order for Discovery and

Inspection and further orders that the Cctzrt may enter;
g

of discovery materials includia electronic .1 iles and technical

Information from the government and des;j res sufficient time to

review t..hose materials prlor so the Ill/ne of re trial motions

(4) Pursuant to Title 13, Uiiil;ed States Code, Sectjop

3161(h) (7) , the ends of justice served by granting the

continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS, therefore, on this of April, 2011,

ORDERED that the dates set fort]) in the Court’s

April 14, 2011, Standing Order for Discovery and Inspection are

adjourned as follows:

(a) defendant’s motions shall ho due on

(b) the government’s response nail be due on

L_Ql;

(c) hearing on the motions shall be held on

QjOO; and

(d) trial of the matter shall be held 2011 at

0am;
t

\ \i-

‘\\\ V

j
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

FREDERICK RUFFIN, JR. and LORETTA 

DONATELLI, individually and on Behalf of 

All Other Persons Similarly Situated,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

AVIS BUDGET CAR RENTAL, LLC and 

AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, LLC,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action No. 11-1069 (SDW) (MCA)

ORDER

January 27, 2014

WIGENTON, District Judge.

This matter, having come before the Court on Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC and Avis 

Rent A Car System, LLC’s (“Defendants” or “Avis”) Motion for Decertification of the Fair 

Labor Standards Act collective action under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (“Motion”), and this Court, 

having carefully considered the submissions and arguments of the parties, for the reasons stated 

in this Court’s Opinion dated January 27, 2014,

IT IS on this 27th day of January, 2014,

ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion is DENIED.

s/ Susan D. Wigenton 

Susan D. Wigenton, U.S.D.J.

cc: Magistrate Judge Madeline C. Arleo

Case 2:11-cv-01069-SDW-MCA Document 129 Filed 01/27/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 4571
Case 3:11-cv-01160-AET-DEA Document 20 Filed 07/20/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 101
Case 3:11-cv-01160-AET-DEA Document 20 Filed 07/20/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 102
Sales Tax in CE Data

Barbara Johnson-Cox 

Division of Consumer Expenditure Survey

CE Microdata Users Workshop

July 14 – 17, 2015

Washington, DC
Outline

 Sales Tax Edit Overview Sales Tax Rate File Sales Tax – Diary Survey Sales Tax – Interview Survey
Sales Tax Edit Overvie

 Purpose: Apply “Sales Tax” to cost fields tha

collect.

 Questionnaire sections that we apply Sales t

 Appliances and household equipment Household Item repairs, service contracts and furn

repairs

 Household furnishings Clothing items Owned vehicles Vehicle operating expenses
Sales Tax Rate Files

 Separate files: One for Diary and on

Interview

Updated annuallyOrganized by State and itemSales tax rate

–Based on the State 

–Based on the particular item
Sales Tax Rate File
Sales Tax Rate Resource S

 Sales Tax Rates – Resource Sites:

State Department of Taxation & Revenue  Federation of Tax Administrators –

http://www.taxadmin.org/fta/link/

 The Sales Tax Clearinghouse –

http://thestc.com/STRates.stm

 Tax Foundation - http://taxfoundation.org/article/s

local-sales-tax-rates-2015

 Avalara Tax Rates - http://www.taxrates.com/state Sale-Tax.com - http://sale-tax.com
Sales Tax – Diary Surve

 Respondents are instructed NOT to 

include sales tax for expenditures. 

One exception: Food Away from Hom

 For each expenditure, we match the 

and the State in which the CU resid
Sales Tax – Diary Surve

Food Away from Home

 Assigning Sales Tax Rate 

The sales tax rate for the particular item is id

– Based on the item and the State

The sales tax “rate” is assigned to the 

However, the sales tax amount is not a

the cost

– (Diary instructions tells the respondent to include the 

in the “cost” reported)
Sales Tax – Diary Surve

All Other Diary Sections

 Appropriate sales tax “rate” is determined Rate is applied to each expenditure cost:

sales tax rate * cost = sales tax amo

 Sales tax “amount” is added to the “cost” 

expenditure item to obtain “total cost”.

sales tax amount + cost = total cost
Sales Tax – Interview Sur

 In certain sections, the respondent is ask

whether the stated expenditure includes s

 Sales tax is added (when necessary) to p

items:

Household appliances and equipmentHousehold item repairs and service contractsHousehold furnishings Clothing, clothing services, watches, jewelryOwned vehiclesVehicle maintenance and repair
Sales Tax – Interview Sur

 Applied only to specific items The appropriate sales tax “rate” is det Rate is then applied to the expenditur

tax rate * cost = sales tax amoun

 Sales tax “amount” is finally added to 

expenditure item:

sales tax amount + cost = total co
Both Surveys

 Additional Details:

The total cost is rounded to two 

decimal places

Output is reviewed by an analy

ensure that taxes are not applietwice
Contact Informatio

Neil Tseng

Supervisory Economist

Division of Consumer Expenditure Survey

www.bls.gov/cex

Telephone: 202.691.6879

Email address: tseng.neil@bls.gov
#### Anna Marie DeSimone, Respondent, v Royal GM, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[856 NYS2d 628]

By failing to move for a directed verdict pursuant to CPLR 4401 on the issue of whether the plaintiff sustained a “serious injury” under Insurance Law § 5102 (d), the defendants implicitly conceded that the issue was for the trier of fact *(see*
      *491
      *Miller v Miller,*68 NY2d 871, 873 [1986]; *Hurley v Cavitolo,*239 AD2d 559 [1997]). Furthermore, the jury verdict finding, inter alia, that the plaintiff sustained a “significant limitation of use of a body function or system” should not be set aside as against the weight of the evidence, as it could have been reached on a fair interpretation of the evidence *(see Bendersky v M & O Enters. Corp.,*299 AD2d 434, 435 [2002]). Lastly, the jury award of damages for the plaintiffs rotator cuff injury and herniated cervical disc did not deviate from what would be reasonable compensation *(see*CPLR 5501; *Severin v Benenati,*251 AD2d 316, 317 [1998]). Ritter, J.P., Florio, Garni and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 20 Filed 06/30/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 307
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 508

To provide that, in establishing wage schedules for certain prevailing rate 

employees with respect to whom the Government is currently experiencing 

recruitment and retention problems, rates of pay for comparable positions 

in the nearest, most similar wage area shall be taken into account. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2003

Mr. WICKER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To provide that, in establishing wage schedules for certain 

prevailing rate employees with respect to whom the Government is currently experiencing recruitment and retention problems, rates of pay for comparable positions in 

the nearest, most similar wage area shall be taken into 

account.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. METHODOLOGY FOR ESTABLISHING CERTAIN 

4 WAGE SCHEDULES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of applying section 

6 5343(d) of title 5, United States Code, with respect to 
2

•HR 508 IH 

1 prevailing rate employees of the Department of Defense 

2 within the Northern Mississippi Wage Grade Area, all 

3 wage schedules and rates for such employees shall be es4 tablished—

5 (1) in accordance with paragraph (2)(A) thereof 

6 (rather than paragraph (1) or (2)(B) thereof); and 

7 (2) deeming all conditions for the application of 

8 such paragraph (2)(A) to have been met. 

9 (b) COMMENCEMENT DATE.—Wage schedules and 

10 rates satisfying the requirements of subsection (a) shall 

11 be established, and shall apply with respect to wages for 

12 service performed in pay periods beginning, no later than 

13 12 months after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

14 (c) TERMINATION.—

15 (1) IN GENERAL.—The requirements of sub16 section (a) shall remain in effect until such time as, 

17 upon written request of the lead agency for the 

18 Northern Mississippi Wage Grade Area (together 

19 with supporting documentation), the Office of Per20 sonnel Management determines that the recruitment 

21 and retention problems giving rise to this Act no 

22 longer exist. 

23 (2) CONSULTATION.—Any determination under 

24 paragraph (1) shall be made in consultation with the 
3

•HR 508 IH 

1 Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee under 

2 section 5347 of title 5, United States Code.

Æ
**Exhibit      32.2**

|   | (3) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (4) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                    |                                                                   |                                  |
|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| Date:                    April 15, 2008 | By:                                                          | /s/ Seth                    Shaw |
|                                    | Seth                    ShawChief                    Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of DOR BioPharma, Inc. (the
      “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December
      31, 2006 ,
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














Date :
      March
      9, 2007      By: Evan
      Myrianthopoulos


Evan
      Myrianthopoulos


Chief
      Financial Officer
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4956

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalties for accessing 

certain electronic communications in a manner that violates consumer 

privacy, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2004

Mr. INSLEE (for himself, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. FLAKE, and Mr. 

DELAHUNT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalties 

for accessing certain electronic communications in a 

manner that violates consumer privacy, and for other 

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘E-mail Privacy Act 

5 of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INTERCEPTIONS. 

7 Section 2510(4) of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended—
2

•HR 4956 IH 

1 (1) by striking the period at the end; and 

2 (2) by inserting ‘‘, and, with respect to an elec3 tronic communication, includes the acquisition of the 

4 contents of the communication through the use of 

5 any electronic, mechanical, or other device, at any 

6 point between the point of origin and the point when 

7 it is made available to the recipient ’’ after ‘‘device’’. 

8 SEC. 3. LIMITATION OF SERVICE PROVIDER EXCEPTION. 

9 Section 2701(c)(1) of title 18, United States Code, 

10 is amended by inserting ‘‘to the extent the access is a nec11 essary incident to the rendition of the service, the protec12 tion of the rights or property of the provider of that serv13 ice, or compliance with section 2702’’ after ‘‘service’’.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7272

DEVON SAMPLE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SERGEANT TART; R. ADCOCK, Lieutenant; HATTIE

PIMPONG,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CA-95-541-5-BO)

Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 6, 1997

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Devon Sample, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, NORTH CAROLINA

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary

judgment and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Sample v. Tart, No. CA-95-541-5-BO (E.D.N.C. June

26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Grace 4, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for quarter ending November 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Virginia K. Sourlis,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: December
      10, 2008
                /s/ Virginia K. SourlisVirginia K. SourlisChief
      Executive Officer andChief
      Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer)(Principal Financial Officer)
CERTIFICATION

I,  Gilles  Addison,  hereby  certify  that:

(9)  I have reviewed this annually report on Form 10-KSB of GSI Technologies USA
     Inc.;

(10) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a  material  fact,  or  omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to  the period covered by this
     report;  and

(11) Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other financial
     information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in  all material
     respects  the  financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of
     the  issuer  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this  report.

(12) I  am  responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures  for  the  issuer  and  have:

     1.   Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  ensure that
               material  information relating to the issuer is made known to me,
               particularly  during the period in which the periodic reports are
               being  prepared;
     2.   Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the issuer's disclosure controls and
               procedures  as  of  October  31st,  2003;  and
     3.   Presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
               disclosure  controls  and procedures based on my evaluation as of
               the  Evaluation  Date;

(13) I  have  disclosed,  based  on  my  most recent evaluation, to the issuer's
     auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of the board of directors (or persons
     fulfilling  the  equivalent  function):

     1.   All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
               controls  which  could  adversely  affect the issuer's ability to
               record,  process,  summarize  and  report financial data and have
               identified  for  the issuer's auditors any material weaknesses in
               internal  controls;  and
     2.   Any  fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
               employees  who  have  a significant role in the issuer's internal
               controls;  and

(14) I  have  indicated  in  the  report  whether  or not there were significant
     changes  in  internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
     affect  internal  controls  subsequent  to  the  date  of  our  most recent
     evaluation,  including  any  corrective  actions with regard to significant
     deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses.


Date: February 3, 2004



By:  /s/  Gilles  Addison
_____________________________
Gilles  Addison
Acting  CFO


<PAGE>
Case 2:11-cv-02360-ES Document 3 Filed 05/09/11 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 31
Case 2:11-cv-02360-ES Document 3 Filed 05/09/11 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 32
Case 2:11-cv-02360-ES Document 3 Filed 05/09/11 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 33
Case 2:11-cv-02360-ES Document 3 Filed 05/09/11 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 34
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Ex Parte Timothy E. Ho

No. 06-18-00098-CV

Appeal from the 196th District Court of 

Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 85199). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, 

Justice Burgess and Justice Stevens

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to 

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the Texas Department of Public Safety pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 5, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Principal  Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned  hereby  certifies  that, to his knowledge,  (i) the Form 10-KSB
filed by Weststar  Financial  Services  Corporation  (the "Issuer") for the year
ended December 31, 2004,  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  and (ii) the  information
contained  in  that  report  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for
the periods presented therein.

                                        Weststar Financial Services Corporation

Date: February 15, 2005                 By: /s/ G. Gordon Greenwood
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            G. Gordon Greenwood
                                            President  & Chief Executive Officer


                                       52
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Baoshinn Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending March 31, 2015, I, Sean Webster, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2015, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2015, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  May 20, 2015

Baoshinn Corporation

By:    /s/ Sean Webster

Sean Webster