alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.2

CFO SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Thelma G. Oribello, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of PSi Technologies Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of
companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys
internal control over financial reporting.



By:

/S/    THELMA G.
ORIBELLOName:

Thelma G. OribelloTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerAugust 15, 2006
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2269

In Re: A. H. ROBINS COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Debtor.

_________________________ GLENNA KIDD, Claimant - Appellant, versus DALKON SHIELD CLAIMANTS TRUST, Trust - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge; Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge; Blackwell N. Shelley, Bankruptcy Judge. (CA-85-1307-R) Submitted: January 26, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999 Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Glenna Kidd, Appellant Pro Se. Orran Lee Brown, Sr., DALKON SHIELD CLAIMANTS TRUST, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Under § 8.04 of the Debtor’s Sixth Amended and Restated Plan of Reorganization, Kidd was already subject to such an injunction. 2 PER CURIAM:Glenna Kidd appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for relief from stay, ordering her to pay $2105 in previouslyimposed sanctions, and permanently enjoining her from filing further actions pertaining to the Dalkon Shield or her Dalkon Shield claim. * We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See In re A. H. Robins Co. (Kidd v. Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust), No. CA-85-1307-R (E.D. Va. July 24, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 2:10-cv-03984-FSH -PS   Document 47    Filed 04/25/11   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 719

Case 2:10-cv-03984-FSH -PS   Document 47    Filed 04/25/11   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 720
Case 2:11-cv-00525-CCC -JAD   Document 43    Filed 07/08/11   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 316

Case 2:11-cv-00525-CCC -JAD   Document 43    Filed 07/08/11   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 317
#### CURACAO TRADING CO., Inc., v. FEDERAL INS. CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Sept. 17, 1942.

*262See also 40 F.Supp. 846; 2 F.R.D. 265; 50 F.Supp. 441; 3 F.R.D. 203.

Gustave Simons, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, of New York City, for defendant.

CONGER, District Judge.

Plaintiff and defendant both move to re-tax the bill of costs in the above entitled action. The defendant contends that the taxable costs should include the sum of $230.40 representing disbursements for stenographers fees for the taking of depositions. The clerk allowed one-half of this amount. The defendant also asks that the sum of $95.75, representing disbursements for obtaining copies of depositions taken by the plaintiff, be included in the bill of costs. This expenditure was disallowed by the clerk.

The plaintiff, on the other hand, requests that the bill of costs be reduced $115.20, claiming that no part of the disbursements for stenographers’ fees for the taking of depositions by the defendant should be allowed in view of the fact that the depositions were taken for the purpose of trial and the action was dismissed before trial on defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

Under Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, depositions may be used either for the purpose of discovery or as evidence. In the case at bar the motion for summary judgment was not made until after the depositions were taken. Undoubtedly, facts adduced at the taking of such deposition were instrumental to some extent in prompting defendant’s counsel to move for summary judgment. This is apparent from the letter of plaintiff’s counsel to Judge Clancy, a copy of which is attached to the affidavit of Theodore E. Woolcott submitted on this motion, wherein it is specifically stated that questions and answers from the depositions were quoted in the moving affidavits on that motion.

The fact that no trial was had is no reason for disallowing, as costs, expenditures incurred by the defendant in the taking of depositions. The depositions were reasonably necessary, and the disbursements made in obtaining them are a proper item of costs. The defendant should be allowed the full amount of such expenditures. See Schmitt v. Continental-Diamond Fibre Co., D.C., 1 F.R.D. 109.

However, the disbursements made by the defendant in obtaining copies of the depositions taken hy the plaintiff were properly disallowed. Cf. Odum v. Willard Stores, Inc., D.C., 1 F.R.D. 680.

The motion of the defendant is granted to the extent of directing that the bill of costs be retaxed so as to allow the sum of $230.40 as disbursements for stenographers fees for the taking of depositions. The plaintiff’s motion is denied.

Settle order on notice.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. §1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of URON Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher Larson, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Steve Staehr, Chief Financial Officer
      of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Christopher LarsonChristopher
                LarsonChief
                Executive OfficerMay
                15, 2008/s/
                Steve StaehrSteve
                StaehrChief
                Financial OfficerMay
                15, 2008
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  August 21, 2007
    /s/ RYUJI UENORyuji Ueno, M.D., Ph.D., Ph.D.Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title
18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) certifies to the best
of his knowledge that:  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 of the Company (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and  (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: November 6, 2009
    
    /s/ RYUJI UENORyuji Ueno, M.D., Ph.D., Ph.D.Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1347 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1347

  To require the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
              unique ZIP code for particular communities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2019

   Mr. Rubio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
              unique ZIP code for particular communities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ZIP CODES.

    Not later than September 30, 2019, the United States Postal Service 
shall designate a single, unique ZIP code for, as nearly as 
practicable, each of the following communities:
            (1) Ocoee, Florida.
            (2) Miami Lakes, Florida.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Mark Feuerbach,
certify that:

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innophos Holdings, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided Innophos Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Innophos
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned expressly disclaims any
obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: August 6, 2009



/S/ MARK FEUERBACHMark Feuerbach Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as a part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



40
Case 1:11-cv-01824-JHR-KMW   Document 44   Filed 05/27/14   Page 1 of 9 PageID: 189

Case 1:11-cv-01824-JHR-KMW   Document 44   Filed 05/27/14   Page 2 of 9 PageID: 190

Case 1:11-cv-01824-JHR-KMW   Document 44   Filed 05/27/14   Page 3 of 9 PageID: 191

Case 1:11-cv-01824-JHR-KMW   Document 44   Filed 05/27/14   Page 4 of 9 PageID: 192

Case 1:11-cv-01824-JHR-KMW   Document 44   Filed 05/27/14   Page 5 of 9 PageID: 193

Case 1:11-cv-01824-JHR-KMW   Document 44   Filed 05/27/14   Page 6 of 9 PageID: 194

Case 1:11-cv-01824-JHR-KMW   Document 44   Filed 05/27/14   Page 7 of 9 PageID: 195

Case 1:11-cv-01824-JHR-KMW   Document 44   Filed 05/27/14   Page 8 of 9 PageID: 196

Case 1:11-cv-01824-JHR-KMW   Document 44   Filed 05/27/14   Page 9 of 9 PageID: 197
Case 2:11-cv-00004-DMC Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 134
Case 2:11-cv-00004-DMC Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 2 of 19 PageID: 135
Case 2:11-cv-00004-DMC Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 3 of 19 PageID: 136
Case 2:11-cv-00004-DMC Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 4 of 19 PageID: 137
Case 2:11-cv-00004-DMC Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 5 of 19 PageID: 138
Case 2:11-cv-00004-DMC Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 6 of 19 PageID: 139
Case 2:11-cv-00004-DMC Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 7 of 19 PageID: 140
Case 2:11-cv-00004-DMC Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 8 of 19 PageID: 141
Case 2:11-cv-00004-DMC Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 9 of 19 PageID: 142
Case 2:11-cv-00004-DMC Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 10 of 19 PageID: 143
Case 2:11-cv-00004-DMC Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 11 of 19 PageID: 144
Case 2:11-cv-00004-DMC Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 12 of 19 PageID: 145
Case 2:11-cv-00004-DMC Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 13 of 19 PageID: 146
Case 2:11-cv-00004-DMC Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 14 of 19 PageID: 147
Case 2:11-cv-00004-DMC Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 15 of 19 PageID: 148
Case 2:11-cv-00004-DMC Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 16 of 19 PageID: 149
Case 2:11-cv-00004-DMC Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 17 of 19 PageID: 150
Case 2:11-cv-00004-DMC Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 18 of 19 PageID: 151
Case 2:11-cv-00004-DMC Document 6 Filed 07/25/11 Page 19 of 19 PageID: 152
#### Luis Sierra, Petitioner, v NYC Department of Correction, Warden, Rikers Island Correction Facility, Respondent.

[853 NYS2d 80]

The hearing officer’s determination is supported by substantial evidence, including the misbehavior report and hearing testimony. It is undisputed that a correction officer saw an object in a vent in petitioner’s cell, which was pushed so far back the officer was unable to retrieve it. That the officer was ultimately able to retrieve the weapon from the back end of the vent in the locked closet next door to petitioner’s cell does not undermine the finding that the contraband was secreted within petitioner’s control, especially since there was a clothesline attached to it *(see Matter of Tarbell v Goord,*263 AD2d 563 [1999]). The fact that inmates had no access to the locked closet further supports a reasonable inference that the contraband was secreted from within petitioner’s cell, and that the clothesline was attached to make it retrievable by the person occupying the cell. Under the circumstances, it is unavailing that the officer was able to ac*338cess the weapon from the locked closet rather than from petitioner’s cell, particularly since it is clear that he had no prior knowledge of the nature of the object, nor would he have been aware how it was placed in the vent. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman and Nardelli, JJ.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Sonic Innovations, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statement (Nos. 333-104239, 333-36562, 333-59988, 333-76250, 333-98303, 333-99035, 333-115524, 333-124814, 333-134361, 333-145312) on Forms S-8 of Sonic Innovations, Inc. of our reports dated March 17, 2008, except asto note 2 subsection “Reclassifications” and note 5 which are dated March 16, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Sonic Innovations, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and the related consolidated statements of operations,shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2007, and the related financial statement schedule which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 annual reporton Form 10-K of Sonic Innovations, Inc. 

Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to the adoptions of FinancialAccounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48 *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income**Taxes**.*

KPMG LLP 

Salt Lake City, Utah 

March 16, 2009
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4918 

To provide for the conveyance of certain Federal land administered by the 

Department of Agriculture in the City of Bastrop, Louisiana, to the 

City to permit the City to establish and operate a regional emergency 

services training center for firefighters, police, and EMS personnel serving rural communities in northeast Louisiana, southern Arkansas, and 

western Mississippi. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2004 

Mr. ALEXANDER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for the conveyance of certain Federal land administered by the Department of Agriculture in the City 

of Bastrop, Louisiana, to the City to permit the City 

to establish and operate a regional emergency services 

training center for firefighters, police, and EMS personnel serving rural communities in northeast Louisiana, 

southern Arkansas, and western Mississippi. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4918 IH 

1 SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRI2 CULTURE PROPERTY, BASTROP, LOUISIANA. 

3 (a) CONVEYANCE REQUIRED.—Notwithstanding any 

4 other provision of law, the Secretary of Agriculture shall 

5 convey, without consideration, to the City of Bastrop, Lou6 isiana (in this section referred to as the ‘‘City’’), all right, 

7 title, and interest of the United States in and to the facil8 ity located at 4673 Eugene Ware Road, Bastrop, Lou9 isiana, commonly known as Paradise Village Children’s 

10 Home, and in and to a parcel of real property, including 

11 any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 27 

12 acres located in the City, for the purpose of permitting 

13 the City to establish and operate a regional emergency 

14 services training center for firefighters, police, and EMS 

15 personnel serving rural communities in northeast Lou16 isiana, southern Arkansas, and western Mississippi. 

17 (b) SURVEY.—The exact acreage and legal descrip18 tion of the real property to be conveyed under subsection 

19 (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Sec20 retary. The cost of the survey shall be borne by the Sec21 retary. 

22 (c) ADDITIONAL TERM AND CONDITIONS.—The Sec23 retary may require such additional terms and conditions 

24 in connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as 
3 

•HR 4918 IH 

1 the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the inter2 ests of the United States. 

Æ
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 2 of 16 PageID: 2
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 3 of 16 PageID: 3
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 4 of 16 PageID: 4
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 5 of 16 PageID: 5
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 6 of 16 PageID: 6
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 7 of 16 PageID: 7
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 8 of 16 PageID: 8
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 9 of 16 PageID: 9
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 10 of 16 PageID: 10
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 11 of 16 PageID: 11
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 12 of 16 PageID: 12
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 13 of 16 PageID: 13
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 14 of 16 PageID: 14
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 15 of 16 PageID: 15
Case 3:11-cv-00639-JAP -LHG Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 16 of 16 PageID: 16
EX-10.5



 Exhibit 10.5 
 THIRD AMENDMENT 
 DATED AS OF FEBRUARY 19, 2013 

TO THE MARKETING AGENT AGREEMENT 
 DATED AS OF APRIL 17, 2007, AS AMENDED MARCH 24, 2008 AND 
 JULY 30, 2012

 AMENDMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) dated as of February 19, 2013 between ALPS DISTRIBUTORS,
INC. (“ALPS”), UNITED STATES COMMODITY FUNDS LLC, formerly Victoria Bay Asset Management, LLC (“USCF”), and UNITED STATES NATURAL GAS FUND, LP (“USNG”). 

WITNESSETH 
 The parties have previously entered into that certain Marketing Agent Agreement dated as of April 17, 2007, as amended on March 24, 2008 and July 30, 2012 (the
“Agreement”). The parties have agreed to amend the Agreement in accordance with the terms of this Amendment. 
 NOW, THEREFORE,
in consideration of the mutual agreements herein contained, ALPS, USCF and USNG hereby acknowledge and agree as follows: 

1. Amendment to the Agreement. Upon execution of this Amendment by ALPS, USCF and USNG, the Agreement shall be
hereby amended as follows: 
 (a) Section 4.3 of the Agreement, “Marketing Agent Fee” shall be amended by adding
the following: 
 In no event will the Marketing Agent Fee exceed 10% of the gross proceeds of the Fund’s offering.








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their
respective officers or authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written. 
  

							
	UNITED STATES COMMODITY FUNDS LLC
		
	 By:
	 	/s/ Howard Mah
		 	Name: Howard Mah
		 	Title: Management Director
	
	UNITED STATES NATURAL GAS FUND, LP
			
		 	By:	 	United States Commodity Funds LLC, as General Partner
				
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Howard Mah

		 		 		 	Name: Howard Mah
		 		 		 	Title: Management Director
	
	ALPS DISTRIBUTORS, INC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Thomas A. Carter

		 	Name: Thomas A. Carter
		 	Title: President


  
 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Randy Wilens, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 519]

No opinion. Skelos, P.J., Ritter, Miller and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.