alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>EXHIBIT 28(a)</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<TABLE CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0 CELLPADDING=7 WIDTH=734>
<TR><TD VALIGN="TOP">
<P ALIGN="RIGHT">EXHIBIT 28(a)</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>


<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<TABLE CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0 CELLPADDING=7 WIDTH=734>
<TR><TD VALIGN="TOP">
<P>REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS TO THE MEMBERS OF WELLMAN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>


<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P>	We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Wellman International Limited and subsidiaries at 31 December 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated profit and loss accounts for each of the three years in the period ended 31
December 1999, all expressed in Euro and prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the company's directors.  Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.</P>

<P>	We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in Ireland which do not differ significantly from generally accepted auditing standards in the United States of America.  Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.</P>

<P>	In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above, present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Wellman International Limited and Subsidiaries at 31 December 1999 and 1998, and the
consolidated results of operations for each of the three years in the period ended 31 December 1999 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.</P>

<P> </P>
<P>KPMG</P>
<P>Chartered Accountants</P>
<P>Registered Auditors</P>

<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P>Dublin, Ireland</P>

<P>8 February 2000</P>

<P> </P></BODY>
</HTML>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1304 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1304

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit 
the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer Continental Shelf in the 
 Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, North Atlantic, and Straits of Florida 
                            planning areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 2, 2019

Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Booker, Mr. Markey, Mr. 
   Sanders, Mr. Coons, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Cardin, Mr. 
   Blumenthal, Mr. Reed, Mr. Schatz, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Wyden, Ms. 
  Harris, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Peters, and Ms. Warren) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit 
the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer Continental Shelf in the 
 Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, North Atlantic, and Straits of Florida 
                            planning areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Ocean And Safe Tourism Anti-
Drilling Act'' or the ``COAST Anti-Drilling Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE 
              OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(q) Prohibition of Oil and Gas Leasing in Certain Areas of the 
Outer Continental Shelf.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
section or any other law, the Secretary of the Interior shall not issue 
a lease or any other authorization for the exploration, development, or 
production of oil, natural gas, or any other mineral in--
            ``(1) the Mid-Atlantic planning area;
            ``(2) the South Atlantic planning area;
            ``(3) the North Atlantic planning area; or
            ``(4) the Straits of Florida planning area.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

_______________________________ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : HON. JOSEPH A. DICKSON

 :

 Plaintiff, : CRIMINAL NO.: 11-6541 (JAD) 

 :

 v. : CONSENT ORDER MODIFYING

 : CONDITIONS OF RELEASE

VANRIE CARRIER, JAMES KING, :

KINDRICK WHITE, CHARLES SIMMONS:

AND ROBERT FAISON : 

 : 

 Defendants. : 

 This matter having been opened to the Court by the Law

Office of Laurie M. Fierro, P.A., Laurie M. Fierro, Esq. appearing

on behalf of defendant Kindrick White, with the consent of Fabiana

Pierre-Louis, Esq., appearing for the United States of America, and

with the consent of Elizabeth Auson of the office of United States

Pretrial Services for an Order modifying the conditions of release

of Kindrick White to remove his Aunt, Patricia Lamb, as the second

cosigner on a Bond and for good cause having been shown, it is on

this day of , 2011

ORDERED that the conditions of release requiring Patricia

Lamb to act as a cosigner on the Bond are hereby modified and that

provision is vacated and it is further

 ORDERED that all other conditions of release shall remain

in effect and it is further

ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be provided to

Fabiana Pierre-Louis, Esq. and Pretrial Services Officer Elizabeth

Auson within days, if received by counsel for Kindrick White.

 __________________________ 

 Hon. Joseph A. Dickson 

Case 2:11-mj-06541-JAD Document 64 Filed 01/25/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 102
2

Case 2:11-mj-06541-JAD Document 64 Filed 01/25/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 103
2006 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

6-22-2006

USA v. Coleman

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 05-1348

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Coleman" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 786.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/786
 Honorable Joseph E. Irenas, Senior District Judge for the District of New Jersey, *

sitting by designation.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-1348

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

EDWARD COLEMAN

a/k/a JOHN LONG,

Edward Coleman,

Appellant

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Criminal Action No. 04-cr-00097)

District Judge: Honorable Petrese B. Tucker

 

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

April 27, 2006

Before: AMBRO and FUENTES, Circuit Judges,

and IRENAS, District Judge *

(Opinion filed June 15, 2006)

ORDER AMENDING PUBLISHED OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above case filed June

15, 2006, be amended as follows:
2

On page 16, footnote 5, last line, replace “238-29” with “238-39” so that the Jones

pin cite reads, “Jones, 526 U.S. at 238-39, 248-49.”

By the Court,

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

Dated: June 22, 2006
Compensatory Arrangements



 Exhibit 10.23 
 Compensatory Arrangements with Executive Officers 
 Compensation for executives at TECO
Energy, Inc. (the “Corporation”) consists of several components. Included among these are base salary and an annual incentive award program. 
 Base salary information for the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the other executive officers named in our most recently filed proxy statement who are currently serving as executive
offers (together, the “named executive officers”) is set forth in the table below. 
 The Corporation’s annual incentive plan,
last amended in February 2011, is Exhibit 10.4 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K to which this document is an exhibit (the “Report”). The 2013 target award percentages for awards under the annual incentive plan for the
named executive officers are set forth in the table below. 
 Compensatory arrangements relating to other aspects of the Corporation’s
executive compensation program are included as exhibits to the Report. 
 Named Executive Officer Salary and Target Award Percentage Information
for 2013 
  

											
	 Name
	  	 Title
	  	Salary	 	  	Target
Award %	 
	 John B. Ramil
	  	President and Chief Executive Officer	  	$	765,000	  	  	 	100	% 
	 Gordon L. Gillette
	  	President of Tampa Electric Company	  	$	535,000	  	  	 	70	% 
	 Sandra W. Callahan
	  	Senior Vice President-Finance and Accounting and Chief Financial Officer	  	$	460,000	  	  	 	65	%
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6461
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee, versus WENDELL MASSIE WOOD, a/k/a Crab, Petitioner - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-128, CA-99-69-7) Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: May 28, 1999 Before WILKINS, ERVIN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Keller Leonard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; William Edward Findler, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Wendell Wood seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Wood , Nos. CR-94-128; CA-99-69-7 (W.D. Va. Mar. 9, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Narek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anna
      Kazanchyan, M.D., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
                Anna Kazanchyan, M.DAnna
                Kazanchyan, M.D.Principal
                Executive OfficerPrincipal
                Financial OfficerMay
                15, 2007
Case 2:11-cr-00165-KSH Document 62 Filed 08/01/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 261
Case 2:11-cr-00165-KSH Document 62 Filed 08/01/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 262
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7318
JOHN L. EDGAR, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE JOHNSON, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00129-RBS) Submitted: December 20, 2007 Decided: December 28, 2007 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John L. Edgar, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: John L. Edgar seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Edgar has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.01





CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Paul S. Lipschutz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of WaterPure International, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of WaterPure International, Inc.





By:

/s/    PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZDate: May 17, 2010

Name:

Paul S. LipschutzTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




I, Robert F. Orr, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of WaterPure International, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of WaterPure International, Inc.







By:

/s/    ROBERT F. OFFDate: May 17, 2010

Name:

Robert F. OrrTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Wrap-N-Roll USA, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the years ending December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual
Report"), we, Alex Ferries, President and Swen Mortenson,
Secretary/Treasurer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.


Dated:  5/30/2007                           /s/ Alex Ferries
      ---------                           -------------------------
                                          Alex Ferries
                                          President and Director


Dated:  5/30/2007                           /s/ Swen Mortenson
      ---------                           -------------------------
                                          Swen Mortenson
                                          Secretary and Treasurer
<PAGE>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

SITI-Sites.com, Inc.
New York, New York

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference and inclusion in the
Prospectus constituting a part of this Registration Statement listed on the
accompanying index of our report dated June 11, 1999, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of SITI-Sites.com, Inc. and subsidiaries
appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March
31, 1999.

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
BDO Seidman

New York, NY
June 21, 2000


Index of Registration Statements

Form               Date

S-8                March 15, 1999
S-8                August 4, 1998
S-8                March 31, 1997
S-8                March 31, 1997
S-8                December 1, 1993
S-3                February 19, 1993
S-3                November 3, 1992
S-3                October 15, 1992
S-3                August 31, 1992
S-3                July 9, 1992
S-3                May 28, 1992
S-3                May 28, 1992
S-8                January 23, 1992
907 A.2d 1008

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ERNEST FRANCOIS, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

September 8, 2006.

ORDERED *that the*petition for certification is granted on the issue of defendant’s sentence, and the matter is summarily remanded to the trial court for resentencing in light of the Court’s decision in *State v. Thomas,*188 *N.J.*137, 902 A.2d 1185 (2006).
Case 2:11-cr-00165-KSH Document 35 Filed 04/20/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 99
Case 2:11-cr-00165-KSH Document 35 Filed 04/20/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 100
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DoMar Exotic Furnishings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: January 5, 2007


/s/ Maureen Doyle Sieck
-----------------------------------------
Maureen Doyle Sieck, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 32.1**

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MedPro Safety Products, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, W. Craig Turner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 
(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |                              |
|---------------------|------------------------------|
|                | MEDPRO SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. |
|                |                         |
| Dated: May 20, 2009 | By:/s/ W. Craig Turner       |
|                | W. Craig Turner              |
|                | Chief Executive Officer      |

----
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

UNITY FRIENDSHIP BAPTIST 

CHURCH,

 Appellant,

v.

WATLTON HOMES, LLC,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

§

No. 08-16-00214-CV

Appeal from the

201st District Court

of Travis County, Texas

(TC# D-1-GN-15-005374)

O R D E R

On September 27, 2017, Appellee Walton Homes, L.L.C (Walton Homes) filed the 

Appellee’s Sur-Reply [Brief] and Objections to Documents and Evidence Not in the Clerk’s 

Record. In that brief, Walton Homes argued inter alia that Appellant, the Unity Friendship 

Baptist Church (Unity), improperly attached extra-record documents in Exhibit A to the 

Appellant’s Reply Brief. Walton Homes asked us to strike Exhibit A “and any argument or 

statements relying on such documents . . . .”

On October 17, 2017, this Court granted Unity’s Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Objections & Response to Appellee’s Sur-Reply Brief. On October 20, 2017, Unity filed 

Appellant’s Objections & Response to Appellee’s Sur-Reply Brief. In that response, Unity 

objected to Walton Homes’ “motion to file a sur-reply brief,” contending that Walton Homes 

“did not request leave of court to do so pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(d) in 

compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b).” We interpret this as a request by 

Unity to strike Walton Homes’ sur-reply brief. Unity also asserted that because Walton Homes 

waited more than three months after Unity filed a reply brief to object to Exhibit A, Walton 

Homes “waived any objections to exhibits.” Unity also asked for thirty days to supplement the 

records with Unity’s Amended Motion for Continuance in the trial court. 
2

We issue the following rulings on the parties’ objections and requests:

1) Unity’s objection to, and motion to strike, Walton Homes’ sur-reply brief is denied.

2) Unity’s assertion that Walton Homes has waived any objection to the inclusion of Exhibit 

A in Unity Reply Brief’s Appendix is overruled.

3) We will take Walton Homes’ motion to strike Exhibit A of Unity’s Reply Brief “and any 

argument or statements relying upon such documents” under advisement, and pass and 

consider the motion along with final disposition of this opinion. 

4) Unity’s request for thirty days to supplement the clerk’s records with its Amended 

Motion for Continuance is granted. The Court will refrain from action on this case for 

thirty days. AS THE DATE OF SUBMISSION HAS ALREADY PASSED IN THIS 

CASE, NO FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WILL BE 

CONSIDERED. After thirty days, the Court will resume its review of the case on the 

merits regardless of whether or not the supplemental clerk’s record has been received.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017.

PER CURIAM