alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

**CEO SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Arthur J. Young, Jr., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of PSi Technologies Holdings, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of thecompany’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financialreporting; and 

 

5. The company’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): 

 

a) All significant deficienciesand weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 132 (Monday, July 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33479-33480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16491]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-254 and 50-265; NRC-2009-0309]

Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee) to 
withdraw its December 21, 2007, application for proposed amendment to 
Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-29 and DPR-30 for the Quad 
Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2, located in Rock Island 
County, Illinois.
    The proposed amendment would have revised the Technical 
Specifications Surveillance Requirements to establish an acceptance 
criterion to verify that total battery connector resistances for the 
125 and 250 volt direct current batteries are within pre-established 
limits that ensure the batteries can perform their design function.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on February 26, 
2008 (73 FR 10298) and December 30, 2008 (73 FR 79932). However, by 
letter dated June 25, 2009, the licensee withdrew the proposed change.

[[Page 33480]]

    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated December 21, 2007, and the licensee's 
letter dated June 25, 2009, which withdrew the application for license 
amendment. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the 
NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, 
Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, 
Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically 
from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) 
Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at the NRC Web site, 
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have 
access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents 
located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by 
telephone at 1-800-397-4209, or 301-415-4737 or by e-mail to 
[email protected].

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day of July 2009.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Christopher Gratton,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch III-2, Division of 
Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E9-16491 Filed 7-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```
Exhibit No. 32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of Juhl Wind, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002 that, to the undersigned’s knowledge:





(1)   the
Report of the Company filed today fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and





(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  May 17,
      2010
                /s/John P. MitolaJohn
      P. MitolaPresident
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Hon. Katharine S. Hayden

 :

v. : Crim. No. 11-122

 :

TIMOTHY MAURICE JENKINS : O R D E R

This matter having come before the Court on the petition of the

United States Probation Office for a hearing regarding the failure of

defendant Timothy Maurice Jenkins (Kevin Carlucci, Assistant Federal

Public Defender, appearing) to comply with certain conditions of

supervised release imposed on October 15, 1997; and a status

conference having been held in this matter on April 8, 2011; and for

good cause shown;

IT IS on this 14 day of April, 2011, th

ORDERED that the hearing in this matter is adjourned until May

13, 2011 at 2:00 p.m.;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a special condition be added to the

conditions of the defendant’s supervised release requiring defendant

to undergo treatment in a mental health program approved by the United

States Probation Office;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this special condition will remain in

effect throughout the duration of the term of supervised release; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other conditions of the judgment

of conviction entered in this matter shall remain in full force and

effect.

Case 2:11-cr-00122-KSH Document 6 Filed 04/13/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 21
SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Katharine S. Hayden 

 KATHARINE S. HAYDEN

 United States District Judge

Case 2:11-cr-00122-KSH Document 6 Filed 04/13/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 22
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-1979NE

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District of v. * Nebraska. * Todd J. Handy, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: September 11, 1998

Filed: November 16, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Todd J. Handy appeals th e fine imposed by the district court following Handy's guilty plea t o a firearms violation. Because Handy failed to object to the fine a t sentencing, we review only for plain error. See United States v. Prendergast , 4 F.3d 560, 561 ( 8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam). Although the district court failed to mak e detailed findings on the factors it considered in setting the amount of the fine, th e district court explained the fine was geared to Handy's ability to pay the fine from his pr ison and postsupervised release earnings, see United States v. Johnston , 973 F.2 d 611, 615 (8th Cir. 1992), and Handy failed to show any impediment to his ability to pay the fine sometime in the future, see United States v. Berndt , 86 F.3d 803, 808 (8th-2-

Cir. 1 996). In these circumstances, we cannot say a fine based on Handy's futur e earning potential was plainly erroneous. We thus affirm the fine impos ed by the district co urt. Additionally, we encourage the district court to compare condition 16 o f Handy's supervised release with this court's decisi on in United States v. Hines , 88 F.2d 661, 663-64 (8th Cir. 1996), to make sure the condition conforms with Hines if Handy is unable fully to pay the fine out of his prison earnings. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Case 2:11-cv-01879-JLL-CCC Document 9 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 27
Case 2:11-cr-00055-CCC Document 20 Filed 07/18/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 51
Case 2:11-cr-00055-CCC Document 20 Filed 07/18/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 52
Exhibit 32.2
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


The undersigned  hereby  certifies  that, to his knowledge,  (i) the Form 10-KSB
filed by Weststar  Financial  Services  Corporation  (the "Issuer") for the year
ended December 31, 2005,  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  and (ii) the  information
contained  in  that  report  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for
the periods presented therein.


                                   Weststar Financial Services Corporation

Date:   February 22, 2006          By:  /s/ Randall C. Hall
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Randall C. Hall
                                        Executive Vice President &
                                        Chief Financial and Principal Accounting
                                        Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-50597

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JERRY URBINA, also known as “Jerry Boy”,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:13-CR-800-5

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jerry Urbina, federal prisoner # 15373-380, is serving a 180-month 

prison sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five 

kilograms or more of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 

841(b)(1)(A)(ii), and 846. He appeals the district court’s denial of his motion 

for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 782 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 3, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-50597 Document: 00514456380 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/03/2018
No. 17-50597

2

to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which lowered the base offense 

levels in the drug quantity table of U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c).

In his sole issue on appeal, Urbina argues that the district court erred 

by determining that he was not eligible for a § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction 

where the sentence was imposed pursuant to a binding plea agreement under 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C). A sentence imposed pursuant 

to a Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement may be reduced under § 3582(c)(2) only if 

“the agreement itself employs the particular Guidelines sentencing range 

applicable to the charged offenses in establishing the term of imprisonment.” 

Freeman v. United States, 564 U.S. 522, 540 (2011) (Sotomayor, J., concurring). 

That condition is not satisfied unless the plea agreement:

(i) calls “for the defendant to be sentenced within a particular 

Guidelines sentencing range;” (ii) provides “for a specific term of 

imprisonment—such as a number of months—but also make[s] 

clear that the basis for the specified term is a Guidelines 

sentencing range applicable to the offense to which the defendant 

pleaded guilty;” or (iii) “explicitly employs a particular Guidelines 

sentencing range to establish the term of imprisonment.”

United States v. Benitez, 822 F.3d 807, 811 (5th Cir. 2016) (quoting Freeman, 

564 U.S. at 538-40 (Sotomayor, J., concurring)). In this case, the 180-month 

sentence agreed to in the Rule 11(c)(1)(C) agreement was not expressly tied to 

the Guidelines.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 17-50597 Document: 00514456380 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/03/2018
911 A.2d 65

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. J.R., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

November 9, 2006.

ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, limited solely to the sentencing issue raised by defendant, and the matter is summarily remanded to the trial court for resentencing in light of *State v. Natale,*184 *N.J.*458, 878 A.2d 724 (2005) and *State v. Thomas*188 *N.J.*137, 902 A.2d 1185 (2006).
Case 1:97-cv-05127-RBK -JS   Document 1172    Filed 09/29/10   Page 1 of 9 PageID: 8920

Case 1:97-cv-05127-RBK -JS   Document 1172    Filed 09/29/10   Page 2 of 9 PageID: 8921

Case 1:97-cv-05127-RBK -JS   Document 1172    Filed 09/29/10   Page 3 of 9 PageID: 8922

Case 1:97-cv-05127-RBK -JS   Document 1172    Filed 09/29/10   Page 4 of 9 PageID: 8923

Case 1:97-cv-05127-RBK -JS   Document 1172    Filed 09/29/10   Page 5 of 9 PageID: 8924

Case 1:97-cv-05127-RBK -JS   Document 1172    Filed 09/29/10   Page 6 of 9 PageID: 8925

Case 1:97-cv-05127-RBK -JS   Document 1172    Filed 09/29/10   Page 7 of 9 PageID: 8926

Case 1:97-cv-05127-RBK -JS   Document 1172    Filed 09/29/10   Page 8 of 9 PageID: 8927

Case 1:97-cv-05127-RBK -JS   Document 1172    Filed 09/29/10   Page 9 of 9 PageID: 8928
S06Y0387.

#### IN THE MATTER OF RICKY D. JONES.

(627 SE2d 24)

Decided February 27, 2006.

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the Respondent Ricky D. Jones’ Petition for Voluntary Discipline in which he seeks a suspension of six months to one year with automatic reinstatement upon completion of the suspension for his admitted violation of Rule 1.15 (II) (b) of Bar Rule 4-102 (d) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct. A violation of Rule 1.15 (II) (b) is punishable by disbarment. Jones also requests that this Court consider applying at least a part of the suspension retroactively to January 12, 2004, which he asserts was the day he stopped practicing law. The State Bar has filed a response recommending that this Court accept Jones’ petition and impose a suspension of 12 months.

In his petition, Jones admits that he used money from his law firm’s escrow account to pay on a promissory note for a courier and trucking services business owned by Jones and a friend. According to Jones, his friend, who managed the business, suffered various misfortunes unrelated to the business, fell into a deep depression, and could no longer operate the business. Consequently, the payments on the promissory note, which Jones had guaranteed, fell into arrears in the amount of $43,614.28, and Jones used money from the firm’s escrow account to pay the note. Jones’ law firm partner subsequently filed the underlying grievance and both Jones and his former law partners filed related lawsuits which have now been settled.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the State Bar that a 12-month suspension is appropriate. However, given the seriousness of the conduct in question, we conclude that it is appropriate to apply only six months of his suspension retroactively to January 12, 2004. In mitigation of discipline, we note that Jones has made full and complete restitution to his former firm, that he has fully cooperated with disciplinary authorities, that his actions caused no harm to any clients, that he has no prior disciplinary record, that he committed the disciplinary violation in an effort to help a friend in trouble, that he has used his practice for the good of his community for at least 17 years, and that he is deeply remorseful for his conduct. Accordingly, Jones hereby is suspended for twelve months from the date of this opinion, with six months of the suspension to apply retroactively to January 12, 2004, and with automatic reinstatement to occur upon completion of the suspension. Jones is reminded of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Twelve-month suspension.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*303
      *Beltran & Associates, Frank J. Beltran, Douglas V Chandler,*for Jones.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Kellyn O. McGee, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Airspan Networks Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Brant, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March
                    12, 2008
                By:
                /s/ David
                      BrantDavid
                      BrantChief
                        Financial
                        Officer
EXHIBIT K 

Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 521-13 Filed 05/17/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 30764
l\~ i,. -.'{.A ~i waiter c. rnc crone o.ssocia,·es, inc. 

,1[1 Li' CONSULTING: ULTRAMICROANALYSIS. 1.11cnoscOPY. SMALL PARTICLE PROBLEMS. SOLID•STATI! CHEMISTRY 

Mr. En1il.;J. Triglia 

Group Le!lder, Analyiioru. and Physical 

Moasu1·erc.ents 

Englchard Minornls nnd Chemicr.ls Di\r • 

. Menlo Park 

Edison, Ntiw Jersey 08817 

Doar Mr. Triglia: 

7 Deoomb::r 1973 

This letter report co1ulr1r.s the annlyticnl re;;ults 011 yr.-ur two tnlo st.m!_jlcs, 

which were telepho11c,{ to you earlinr by Itu, ::!~t~.•rn:..'t. Tl1c enmp!tln a!·a 

labelccl "E:MTAL 42, E-149-'/3A" a1~d "El1I'J'.l:.L 50(1, J:-H9-r/3ls". 

Ao you i:equestcd,. we analyzed the two n:im11lcs in r:.~i::-otdr,r,c:::i ".ilh th() i;-1,1:,x 

of refrr.ctiou method detailed ill ihc Jrc•.brnl Hc:•;foc<n 1,--.r 28 Scpf-emb::r rn·;:\ 

pp 27079-80. We fouad no aobest,w flberG in either srimpl.o. Wa notr,cJ.in 

pns5tng tlutt th!l A sampfo· (EMTAL 42) co11h1i.:~t::l rt nt)~.nbc •' 0£ cnfoi t~ p:1.i' th:lm!. 

II you h::r.ve nny quostiouo about this ,·:erk plc~.::c do ~ut hcsita(:) to contact m~. 

LBM:nlm 

Ref:MA3660 

Sfncercl.7 ycurs, 

;: ';/ (}], JJ,~ 60,tL 

Luc!/ :B. MoC1·one 

Senior Rcsenl'ch Scl::mifat 

2820 SOUTH M!CHIGAN'AVe'.NUE , CHICAGO. 1. Lllf~OIS GOCi 16 • 312 · ~42-7 lll;) • CADLE: CHEMICllOtlE 

VOLK BASF 00044 

BASF WILLIAMS000072017 

Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 521-13 Filed 05/17/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 30765
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY                                                EXHIBIT 24.1(b)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Each of the undersigned, being a director or officer, or both, of GAYLORD
CONTAINER CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), does hereby
constitute and appoint each of Marvin A. Pomerantz and Daniel P. Casey as his
true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him/her and in his/her name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Corporation's Form 10-K for the Corporation's 2001
fiscal year and to file same, together with all exhibits thereto and other
attachments and documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, the American Stock Exchange and any other regulatory
authority, and to sign, file or deliver such further documents and to take such
further actions in connection therewith as each of the undersigned might or
could do in person and as each such attorney and agent deems necessary or
desirable; and each of the undersigned does hereby fully ratify and confirm all
that said attorneys and agents, or any of them, or the substitute of any of
them, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

SIGNATURE                                                                  TITLE


                                  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
-------------------------                          (Principal Executive Officer)
Marvin A. Pomerantz


                                                      Vice Chairman and Director
-------------------------                          (Principal Financial Officer)
Daniel P. Casey


                                                         Vice President, Finance
-------------------------                         (Principal Accounting Officer)
Jeffrey B. Park


/s/ Mary Sue Coleman                                                    Director
-------------------------
Mary Sue Coleman


/s/ Harve A. Ferrill                                                    Director
-------------------------
Harve A. Ferrill


/s/ John E. Goodenow                                                    Director
-------------------------
John E. Goodenow


/s/ David B. Hawkins                                                    Director
-------------------------
David B. Hawkins


/s/ Warren J. Hayford                                                   Director
-------------------------
Warren J. Hayford


/s/ Charles S. Johnson                                                  Director
-------------------------
Charles S. Johnson


/s/ Jerry W. Kolb                                                       Director
-------------------------
Jerry W. Kolb


/s/ Ralph L. MacDonald Jr.                                              Director
-------------------------
Ralph L. MacDonald Jr.