alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Penn Virginia GP Holdings, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, A. James Dearlove, Chief Executive Officer of PVG GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 6, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ A. James Dearlove  
|                       |  |  |  | A. James Dearlove      
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5051

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1001 Williams Street in Ignacio, Colorado, as the ‘‘Leonard C. Burch 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2004

Mr. MCINNIS (for himself, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. TANCREDO, Ms. DEGETTE, Mrs. 

MUSGRAVE, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, and Mr. BEAUPREZ) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1001 Williams Street in Ignacio, Colorado, 

as the ‘‘Leonard C. Burch Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LEONARD C. BURCH POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 1001 Williams Street in Ignacio, 

6 Colorado, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Leonard 

7 C. Burch Post Office Building’’. 
2

•HR 5051 IH 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the Leonard C. Burch Post 

5 Office Building.

Æ
911 A.2d 64

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-MOVANT, v. ALTURIK FRANCIS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

November 9, 2006.

ORDERED that the cross-motion for leave to appeal is granted.
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                  |   |                               |
|-----------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
| Date: August 19, 2010 |   | /s/ Harold Brand    |
|                  |   | Harold Brand                       |
|                  |   | Interim Chief Financial Officer    |
|                  |   |                               |
Exhibit 10.20 2012 10-K






EXHIBIT 10.20


PEOPLES BANCORP INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012


SUMMARY OF BASE SALARIES FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
OF PEOPLES BANCORP INC.


The base salaries of executive officers of Peoples Bancorp Inc. (“Peoples”) are determined by evaluating the most recent comparative peer data and the role and responsibilities of their positions.  Individual salary increases are reviewed annually and are based on Peoples' overall performance and the executive's attainment of specific individual business objectives during the preceding year.


The following table details the base salaries to paid by Peoples and its subsidiaries to Charles W. Sulerzyski, President and Chief Executive Officer of Peoples, and the four other most highly compensated executive officers of Peoples for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013:


	
					
	Name
	Position/Title
	Base Salary

	Charles W. Sulerzyski
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	$
	450,000
	


	 
	 
	 

	Edward G. Sloane
	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
	219,000
	


	 
	 
	 

	Daniel K. McGill
	Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Banking Officer
	234,000
	


	 
	 
	 

	Timothy H. Kirtley
	Executive Vice President, Chief Credit Officer
	210,000
	


	 
	 
	 

	Carol A. Schneeberger
	Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer
	215,000
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-06-11T17:39:52Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-06-11T17:39:54Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-06-11T17:39:54Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="13859">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-06-11T17:39:52Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>2391 </p>
<p></p>
<div class="ocr">2391

Ne OPIN ION

RE \snuebd

By THES
NUM 662.
</div>

</div>
</body></html>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 27, 2009 

p0120 

Order 

 

January 27, 2009 

137613 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137613 

 COA: 277777 

Van Buren CC: 06-015376-FC 

TIMOTHY EUGENE ANDREWS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 25, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 22, 2016

No. 04-16-00335-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M.,

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-05876

Honorable Renée Yanta, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. Appellant’s pro se motion for extension of time 

to file the appellant’s brief is granted. We order appellant to file her brief by January 23, 2017.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of December, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
909 A.2d 719

#### IN THE MATTER OF LEO R. VARTAN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

November 8, 2006.

ORDER

LEO R. VARTAN of KEARNY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1969, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since December 11, 2002, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that LEO R. VARTAN is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by LEO R. VARTAN pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court for good cause shown and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys.

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Adam Worth, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 765]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), rendered January 7, 2005, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses review of his challenges to the court’s suppression ruling, and to the procedures by which the court arrived at its determination *(People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]; *see also People v Allen,*86 NY2d 599, 602-603 [1995]). We have considered and rejected defendant’s arguments concerning the enforceability of the waiver. Concur—Tom, J.E, Marlow, Sullivan, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1844
LINDA SYDNOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-580-K) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 30, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Linda Sydnor, Appellant Pro Se. Valerie Valenti Cloutier, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting the employer's motion for summary judgment in Appellant's action filed pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12117 (1994), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 791-794 (1994), and M D . ANN . C ODE art. 49B, §§ 7, 16(1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Appellant failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination. Accordingly, we affirm. See Ennis v. National Ass'n of Bus. & Educ. Radio , 53 F.3d 55, 58 (4th Cir. 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         100,224
<SECURITIES>                                       400
<RECEIVABLES>                                  111,622
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               212,246
<PP&E>                                       3,011,349
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,024,675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,198,920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,671
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,034,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,198,920
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               404,324
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  145,728
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                258,596
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            258,596
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   258,596
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.55


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF THE


PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Richard Reincke, the CEO and CFO
of GWS Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of GWS Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
January 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of GWS Technologies,
Inc.





Date:
March 19,
2010                            /s/ Richard
Reincke


Richard
Reincke


Chief
Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer
SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT TO
EXCLUSIVE BUSINESS CONSULTANCY SERVICE AGREEMENT
 Supplementary Agreement PRC
 (1)
    
    T2CN Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., located at 12F, 418, Gui Ping Road,
Shanghai, with Deng Ruen-Zeh as the legal representative (hereinafter called T2CN)(2)
    
    Shanghai T2 Advertisement Co., Ltd., located at Suite 3A01, 665, Zhang Jiang Road, Pudong,
Shanghai, with Cheng Yen-Ching as the legal representative (hereinafter called T2).
     T2CN Information Technology

(Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    
    
    Shanghai T2 Advertisement Co., Ltd.Signed by:
    
    /s/ Guo Jun Wei
    
    
    
    Signed by:
    
    /s/ Min JiName:  Guo Jun Wei
    
    
    
    
    
    Name:  Min JiTitle:     Authorized Representative
    
    
    
    
    
    Title:     Authorized Representative
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MattMar Minerals Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sean
Mitchell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
10th day of April, 2007.


/s/ Sean Mitchell
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
#### Alice McGloin, Appellant, v Maria J. Golbi et al., Respondents.

[853 NYS2d 378]

*611The plaintiff allegedly was injured when the ambulance she was driving collided with the defendants’ vehicle in a northbound lane of the FDR Drive. The trial court properly exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of a prior incident where the plaintiff had been disciplined by her employer for the inappropriate use of the lights and siren on an ambulance as within the scope of the direct examination of the plaintiff *(see Feldsberg v Nitschke,*49 NY2d 636, 642 [1980]).

However, the trial court committed reversible error by giving the jury a missing document charge regarding the plaintiff’s failure to produce a driver log which the plaintiffs partner prepared the day of the accident, in the absence of any evidence that the log existed or was requested in discovery *(see Jean-Pierre v Touro Coll.,*40 AD3d 819 [2007]; *Wilkie v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*274 AD2d 474 [2000]). It also erred in precluding the plaintiff from introducing her MV-104 accident report on the ground that it merely bolstered her testimony *(see Pomer v Chen,*187 AD2d 497 [1992]). The plaintiff should have been permitted to introduce the report to counter a charge of “recent fabrication” *(Lichtrule v City Sav. Bank of Brooklyn,*29 AD2d 565 [1967]).

The court further erred in instructing the jury that if it found that the defendants were negligent, the common-law standard of negligence automatically applied. Rather, it is for the jury to determine if an emergency existed and, if so, the plaintiff would be entitled to the application of the “reckless disregard” standard of care set forth in Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104 *(see Criscione v City of New York,*97 NY2d 152 [2001]; *cf. Sierk v Frazon,*32 AD3d 1153, 1155 [2006]; *O’Connor v City of New York,*280 AD2d 309 [2001]).

A new trial is warranted because the cumulative effect of the errors was unduly prejudicial *(see*CPLR 2002; *Wilbur v Lacerda,*34 AD3d 794 [2006]; *Bayne v City of New York,*29 AD3d 924 [2006]; *Smith v Kuhn,*221 AD2d 620 [1995]; *Cohn v Meyers,*125 AD2d 524 [1986]). Lifson, J.P., Ritter, Florio and Garni, JJ., concur.
Order entered May 1 3 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 01299 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF J .C., ET AL On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 76 - 08723 - V 

### O RDER Appellant’s brief was originally due December 20, 2014. After receiving notice in January 2015 that the trial court had allowed appellant’s counsel to withdraw in November 2014, we ordered the brief be filed by February 13, 2015. We subsequently extended that deadline twice, in part to allow appellant an opportunity to retain counsel. In our order granting the last extension, we cautioned appellant that failure to file the brief by the deadline could result in dismissal of the appeal without further noti ce. Appellant now seeks another extension. We GRANT the extension request and ORDER appellant to file his brief no later than June 1, 2015. Appellant is cautioned that no further extensions will be granted and failure to file the brief will result in di smissal of the appeal without further notice. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32








CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the report of Ridgewood Energy T Fund, LLC (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Fund hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.





RIDGEWOOD ENERGY T FUND, LLCDated:
April 29, 2010
By:
/s/

ROBERT E. SWANSONName:

Robert E. SwansonTitle:

Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Dated:
April 29, 2010
By:
/s/

KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRYName:

Kathleen P. McSherryTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to Ridgewood Energy T Fund, LLC and will be retained by Ridgewood Energy T Fund, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
      32.2


Certification
      of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002








The
      undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-KSB filed
      by
      Weststar Financial Services Corporation (the “Issuer”) for the year ended
      December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained
      in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the
      periods presented therein.














Date:   March
                5, 2008
            
            /s/
                Randall C. HallRandall
                C. HallChief
                Financial and Principal Accounting Officer














56