alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gulf & Orient Steamship Company, Ltd. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), we, Michael Vardakis, President, and Melissa Ladakis, Secretary and Treasurer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:May 17, 2011By:/s/Michael VardakisMichael Vardakis, President  and Director  Date:May 17, 2011By:/s/Melissa LadakisMelissa Ladakis ,Secretary,  Treasurer and Director    1
Case 2:11-cv-00901-DMC-MF Document 7 Filed 11/30/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 52
Case 2:11-cv-00901-DMC-MF Document 7 Filed 11/30/11 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 53
Case 2:11-cv-00901-DMC-MF Document 7 Filed 11/30/11 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 54
Case 2:11-cv-00901-DMC-MF Document 7 Filed 11/30/11 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 55
Case 2:11-cv-00901-DMC-MF Document 7 Filed 11/30/11 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 56
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4991 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4991

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 9130 Markville Drive in Dallas, Texas, as the ``Vaughn Gross Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2004

 Mr. Sessions introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 9130 Markville Drive in Dallas, Texas, as the ``Vaughn Gross Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VAUGHN GROSS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 9130 Markville Drive in Dallas, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Vaughn Gross Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Vaughn Gross 
Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:11-cv-01466-SDW-MCA Document 3 Filed 03/18/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 16
FILED

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICt! ~Oi~WJfCT CaUR1'.10

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARl)\6l\RwJ OF HP,RYLAh

\ 10n t~AY\-5 P ~: 2~'

JEROME FREDDIE MORRIS, JR. #43935037 *

Petitioner

v

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Respondent

*

*

*

*

***

l\f:-~)~1T't{ B...~t ._. _,..' I,,; L.,. '~." ~

Civll'Achon -C~se No. RDB-II-828

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending is Jerome Freddie Morris' (Morris) challenge to the execution of his term of

confinement. I For the reasons that follow, the case will be transferred to the United States

District Court for the District of New Jersey.

Morris, a federal prisoner confined at the Federal Correctional Institution-Fort Dix, is

challenging a determination about his assignment to twelve-month home detention. Although

Morris, who is self-represented, characterizes his motion as filed under Rule 60 (b) (l), (5) and

(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, he provides neither factual nor legal basis for rule

60(b) review 2 and his claims are more properly raised by way of a Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus under 28U.S.C. 92241. See e.g. Atehortua v. Kindt, 951 F.2d 126, 129-30 (7th

Cir.1991 ) (calculation and manner of execution of term of imprisonment reviewed under 92241).

This petition will be so considered.

I On November 4,2009, Morris was sentenced to twenty-four months incarceration after he pleaded guilty to

conspiracy to import cocaine and heroin in violation of21 V.S.c. 9963 in United States v. Morris, Criminal Action

No. RDB-09-05 (D. Md.).

2 Further, Rule 60(b) authorizes a court to "relieve a party from a final judgment for certain enumerated reasons."

Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Morris is not asking for relief from a final judgment but instead takes issues with an

administrative determination by the Bureau of Prisons.

Case 1:11-cv-02605-RBK Document 2 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 19
A S 2241 action is generally filed in the district court where a petitioner is in custody. See

28 U.S.C. S 2241(a); see also Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit, 410 U.S. 484,495-500 (1973). In

this case, Morris is in the custody of the Warden at FCI Fort Dix. As that facility is located

within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, this

matter will be transferred to that court for all proceedings that may be appropriate. 3 A separate

Order follows.

M,2)~;!~

RICHARD D. BENNETT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3 Morris has neither submitted the $ 5.00 filing fee for S 2241 petitions nor moved to proceed in forma pauperis.

While this Court will transfer this matter to the proper jurisdiction, the Court notes that before initiating as 2241

action, a petitioner is required to exhaust administrative remedies. Morris does not state whether he has exhausted

his claims through the Bureau of Prisons administrative grievance process.

2

Case 1:11-cv-02605-RBK Document 2 Filed 05/05/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 20
EX-10.21




 Exhibit 10.21 
 [Kraton Letterhead] 
 November [    ], 2012 

[Name] 
 [Address] 

[Address] 
 Dear
[                    ]: 
 We are
implementing the Amended and Restated Kraton Polymers US LLC Benefits Restoration Plan, as amended and restated January 1, 2013. 
 We
intend to fund the benefits payable under the Benefits Restoration Plan through the purchase of corporate-owned life insurance on your life and the lives of some of the other participants. The life insurance policies will be owned by the Company.

 In consideration of your consent to be insured, we agree to pay your estate a death benefit of $50,000 if you are employed with us, or fully
retired based on our defined benefit definition, on the date of your death. 
 Kraton Polymers US LLC

 Melinda S. Conley, 

Vice President, Human Resources
James E. Cecchi 

Lindsey H. Taylor 

Donald A. Ecklund 

CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN, 

BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. 

5 Becker Farm Rd. 

Roseland, New Jersey 07068 

(973) 994-1700 

Counsel for Plaintiffs and Class Counsel 

[Additional Counsel on Signature Page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN RE: 

NUTELLA MARKETING AND SALES 

PRACTICES LITIGATION 

Civil Action No. 11-1086(FLW)(DEA) 

NOTICE OF MOTION 

To: All Counsel via ECF 

COUNSEL: 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, on July 9, 2012 at 10:00 a.m., the parties shall jointly 

move before the Hon. Freda L. Wolfson, U.S.D.J. at the at the Clarkson S. Fisher Federal 

Building and U.S. Courthouse, 402 East State Street, Trenton, New Jersey, to enter an Order 

approving the application of Plaintiffs Marnie Glover and Jayme Kaczmarek and Class Counsel 

Carella, Byrne, Cecchi, Olstein, Brody & Agnello and Scott+Scott LLP for an award of 

attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(h), and approval of 

a $2,000 incentive award for each of the Class Representatives. 

Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 69 Filed 05/25/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1259
2

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, in support of the motion, the parties will rely 

upon the accompanying brief in support of application for award of attorneys’ fees, 

reimbursement of expenses and approval of incentive awards and the supporting declarations and 

affidavit. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, a proposed form of Order is attached. 

CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, 

OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Kaczmarek and the Class 

By: /s/ James E. Cecchi 

 JAMES E. CECCHI 

Dated: May 25, 2012 

Christopher M. Burke 

SCOTT+SCOTT LLP 

707 Broadway, Suite 1000 

San Diego, CA 92101 

(619) 233-4565 

Joseph P. Guglielmo 

SCOTT+SCOTT LLP 

500 Fifth Avenue, 40th Floor 

New York, NY 10110 

(212) 223-6444 

Counsel for Plaintiff Glover and Class Counsel 

Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 69 Filed 05/25/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1260
LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO




---

LOGO
Case 1:11-cv-02578-RMB-KMW Document 46 Filed 03/26/12 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 254
Case 1:11-cv-02578-RMB-KMW Document 46 Filed 03/26/12 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 255
Case 1:11-cv-02578-RMB-KMW Document 46 Filed 03/26/12 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 256
Case 1:11-cv-02578-RMB-KMW Document 46 Filed 03/26/12 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 257
#### Norton and others *v.*City of Portsmouth.

*(Circuit*Court, *D. New Hampshire.*

June 7, 1887.)

Trial—Federal Practice—Section 914, Rev. St.

■ Where a defendant, in an action brought in a circuit court of the United States, files several pleas, the court may direct the issues of fact arising on one of the pleas to be tried first, according to the law of the state where the court sits, by-virtue of section 914 of the Revised Statutes, under which the practice in the federal courts is made to conform to that of the state where the court is held.

At Law.

The defendant, having been granted leave to plead double, filed several *pleas—First,*the general issue; *second,*the statute of limitations; *third,*a release of all claims, causes of action, etc.., under the patent granted to Knibly, and set forth in the declaration; *fourth,*a plea denying infringement, etc.; *fifth,*license; *sixth,*public use of the alleged invention, etc.;—and asked the court for a hearing on the third plea, on the ground that if that is sustained by proof there is an end of the case, and the time and expense involved on the trial, which is likely to be a protracted one, would in consequence be saved.

*Harvey D. Hadloch,*for plaintiff.

*William L. Foster,*for defendants.

Colt, J.

I am of opinion that the motion of the defendant for an order of court that the issues of fact arising upon the third plea may be first tried, should be granted. By the law of New Hampshire, as laid down in the recent case of *Owen*v. *Weston,*63 N. H. 599, 4 Atl. Rep. 801, whether all or a part of the issues in any action should be tried at one time, is a question of justice and convenience. This being an action at law, I see no reason, under section 914 of the Revised Statutes, why the practice of the United States courts should not conform to that of the state. In the present case, I am satisfied that justice and convenience call for the trial first of the issues arising upon defendant’s third plea, and that the defendant should not be put to the costs, expense, and trouble of a trial on the merits until a determination of the questions raised by that plea.
Exhibit10.4 Minton Stay Agreement Amendment




Exhibit 10.4
Alterra


November 13, 2012


Peter Minton
Alterra Capital Holdings Limited
Hamilton, Bermuda


Re: Amendment to Employment Stay Protection


Dear Peter:


This letter agreement (“Stay Agreement Amendment”) confirms our recent discussion regarding the terms of the letter agreement between you and Alterra Capital Holdings Limited, dated October 18, 2010 (the “Stay Agreement”).  Your signature at the bottom of this Stay Agreement Amendment will indicate your acceptance of the following:


The Stay Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following proviso to the end of the first sentence of Section 2 of the Stay Agreement:


“; provided, however, that notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of a voluntary termination by you pursuant to Section 3(b) below, the required notice period will be 75 calendar days.”


The remainder of the Stay Agreement will remain unmodified and in full force and effect.








_________________________________________            _____________
W. Marston Becker                            Date
President & Chief Executive Officer and Director
Alterra Capital Holdings Limited






_________________________________________            _____________
Peter Minton                                Date
Chief Operating Officer
Alterra Capital Holdings Limited
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of Mattmar Minerals, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Arnold P. Kling, President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|                       |     |                                                                                                                                                      
|---------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       | (1) | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934, as amended; and                  
|                       |     |                                                                                                                                                      
|                       | (2) | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and result of operations of the Company.
|                       |     |                                                                                                                                                      
|Dated: January 8, 2009
|                      
|/s/ Arnold P. Kling   
|                      
|Arnold P. Kling       
|President             

A signed original of this
certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24
- 1098

TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CREDIT MANAGEMENT, LP; CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., d/b/a Spectrum , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:23

- cv - 00408

- D

- RN )

Submitted : May 21 , 2024 Decided: May 24, 2024

Before WYNN and BENJAMIN , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN , Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se. Caren D. Enloe, SMITH DEBNAM NARRON DRAKE SAINTSING & MYERS, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Elizabeth C. King, CRANFILL SUMNER, LLP, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1098 Doc: 18 Filed: 05/24/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel appeals the district court’s order (a) denying McDaniel’s motions for an extension of time to respond to a pending dispositive motion and for leave to file a third amended complaint; and (b) granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12( b)(6), (c). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. McDaniel v. Credit Mgmt., LP , No. 5:23

- cv - 00408

- D

- RN (E.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 24-1098 Doc: 18 Filed: 05/24/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
---

Exhibit 32.2

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER     
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,          
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Rafeh Hulays, Chief Financial Officer and Director of
Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (a) | the Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the third quarter ended January 31, 2008, and to which this certification
      is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           

|By:    | /s/ Rafeh Hulays                                                     | 
|------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Rafeh Hulays                                                         | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer and
      Director                           | 
|       | (Principal Financial Officer and
      Principal Accounting Officer) | 
|Date:  | March 14, 2008                                                       | 

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5053

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1475 Western Avenue, Suite 45, in Albany, New York, as the ‘‘Lieutenant John F. Finn Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2004

Mr. MCNULTY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1475 Western Avenue, Suite 45, in Albany, 

New York, as the ‘‘Lieutenant John F. Finn Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT JOHN F. FINN POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 1475 Western Avenue, Suite 45, 

6 in Albany, New York, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Lieutenant John F. Finn Post Office’’. 
2

•HR 5053 IH 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the Lieutenant John F. 

5 Finn Post Office.

Æ
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

Chief J ustice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway, J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

s0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

139048

EDDIE ALLEN, Plaintiff,

v SC: 139048 AGC: 3284/07

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested
relief.
#### PIXION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., and Citrix Online, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 2012-1636.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 19, 2013.

Colby B. Springer, Lewis and Roca, LLP, of Mountain View California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel was Shane E. Olafson, of Phoenix, *AZ.*

Blair M. Jacobs, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Sarah Chapin Columbia and Leigh J. Martinson, of Boston, Massachusetts. Of counsel on the brief was Terry W. Ahearn, of Menlo Park, CA. Of counsel was Bryan Keith James, of Menlo Park, CA.

LOURIE, BRYSON, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Case 2:11-cv-01210-SDW-MCA Document 12 Filed 04/23/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 161
Case 2:11-cv-01210-SDW-MCA Document 12 Filed 04/23/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 162
Case 2:11-cv-01210-SDW-MCA Document 12 Filed 04/23/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 163
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report ofSnowdon Resources Corporation(the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A-1 for the period endedJanuary 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Elden Schorn, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 16thday of September, 2008.                                                                                                               
|   

ELDEN SCHORNElden SchornChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





















---