alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5064

To prohibit the giving or acceptance of payment for the placement of a 

child, or obtaining consent to adoption. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2004

Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To prohibit the giving or acceptance of payment for the 

placement of a child, or obtaining consent to adoption.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Baby Selling Prohibi5 tion Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 77 of title 18, United 

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 
2

HR 5064 IH 

1 ‘‘§ 1596. Accepting or charging excess amounts in 

2 connection with the placement of a child 

3 or obtaining consent to adoption 

4 ‘‘(a) DEFINITION OF MINOR.—In this section, the 

5 term ‘minor’ has the same meaning as in section 25(a)(2). 

6 ‘‘(b) IN GENERAL.—Whoever, in connection with the 

7 adoption of a minor, knowingly accepts or charges any fee 

8 in excess of the allowable costs for adoption, as those costs 

9 are defined under the law of the State in which the adop10 tion is finalized, shall be imprisoned for not more than 

11 10 years. 

12 ‘‘(c) ALLOWABLE COSTS.—If, under the law of any 

13 State in which an adoption is finalized, the allowable costs 

14 associated with the adoption of a minor are not defined, 

15 the allowable costs for purposes of this section shall be—

16 ‘‘(1) maternity-related medical and costs; 

17 ‘‘(2) travel, meal, and lodging costs accrued 

18 when necessary for court appearances; 

19 ‘‘(3) counseling fees; 

20 ‘‘(4) fees to cover pre- and post-adoption coun21 seling provided by a licensed health practitioner; 

22 ‘‘(5) attorney and legal fees associated with the 

23 adoption; 

24 ‘‘(6) foster care for the child to be adopted; and 

25 ‘‘(7) foster care for the child to be adopted, and 

26 costs associated with medical care, routine care, 
3

HR 5064 IH 

1 travel, and living expenses of the child to be adopt2 ed. 

3 ‘‘(d) LIMITATION.—All costs described under sub4 section (b) or (c) shall be reasonable and customary within 

5 the State in which the adoption is finalized. 

6 ‘‘(e) APPLICABILITY.—This section shall apply to all 

7 individuals, intermediaries, or entities involved in the 

8 adoption of a minor.’’. 

9 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—

10 The table of sections for chapter 77 of title 18, United 

11 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol12 lowing:

‘‘1596. Accepting or charging excess amounts in connection with the placement 

of a child or obtaining consent to adoption.’’.

Æ
Case 2:11-cr-00305-KM Document 9 Filed 07/05/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 16
Case 2:11-cr-00305-KM Document 9 Filed 07/05/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 17
Case 2:11-cr-00305-KM Document 9 Filed 07/05/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 18
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of RADVISION Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Adi Sfadia, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Adi Sfadia*


Adi Sfadia


Chief Financial Officer





May 11, 2011




*           The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
Case 3:11-cv-02506-JAP-TJB Document 100 Filed 10/24/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1927
Case 3:11-cv-02506-JAP-TJB Document 100 Filed 10/24/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1928
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CAMDEN VICINAGE

MICHAEL FRENCH,

 Plaintiff,

v.

TROOPER J.T. SQUIRE-TIBBS,

et al.,

 Defendants.

Civil No. 11-1009-JEI-KMW

SCHEDULING ORDER FOR FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE

This Scheduling Order confirms the directives given to

counsel during the telephone status conference held on July 9,

2013; and the Court noting the following appearances: Graham Baird,

Esquire, appearing on behalf of the plaintiff; and Christopher

Paldino, Esquire, appearing on behalf of the defendant,

IT IS on this 9th day of July, 2013, hereby ORDERED:

1. The Final Pretrial Conference shall be conducted on

September 10, 2013 at 11:30 a.m. in Room 2040. The form Joint Final

Pretrial Order (original and two copies for the court, with

sufficient copies for all counsel), as signed by all counsel, shall

be delivered to the Court by September 6, 2013. The plaintiff's

portion of the proposed order shall be prepared and sent to defense

counsel no later than August 5, 2013. Defendant's portion of the

proposed order shall be prepared and returned to counsel for

plaintiff no later than August 19, 2013.

2. Any application for an extension of time beyond the

deadlines set herein shall be made in writing to the undersigned and

served upon all counsel prior to expiration of the period sought to

be extended, and shall disclose in the application all such

extensions previously obtained, the precise reasons necessitating the

application showing good cause under FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b), and

whether adversary counsel agree with the application. The schedule

set herein will not be extended unless good cause is shown.

TRIAL COUNSEL MUST APPEAR AT THE FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXCUSED BY THE COURT. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(d).

THE FAILURE OF A PARTY OR ATTORNEY TO OBEY THIS ORDER OR

APPEAR AT THE CONFERENCE MAY RESULT IN IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS UNDER

FED. R. CIV. P. 16(f).

Case 1:11-cv-01009-RBK-KMW Document 45 Filed 07/09/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 739
s/ Karen M. Williams

KAREN M. WILLIAMS

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Hon. Joseph E. Irenas

Case 1:11-cv-01009-RBK-KMW Document 45 Filed 07/09/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 740
#### City Line Rent A Car, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Alfess Realty, LLC, Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 214]

In an action, inter alia, for declaratory and injunctive relief in connection with a commercial lease, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dorsa, J.), entered August 22, 2005, as denied those branches of their motion which were to dismiss the defendant’s first and second counterclaims pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“Under CPLR 3211 (a) (1), a dismissal is warranted only if the documentary evidence submitted conclusively establishes a defense to the asserted claims as a matter of law” *(Leon v Martinez,*84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]). “[0]n a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), the court must determine whether, accepting as true the factual averments of the [pleading] and according the [nonmoving party] the benefits of all favorable inferences which may be drawn therefrom, the [proponent of the pleading] can succeed upon any reasonable view of the facts stated” *(Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of New Rochelle v County of Westchester,*282 AD2d 561, 562 [2001]). The Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the plaintiffs’ motion which were to dismiss the defendant’s *836first and second counterclaims pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7) *(see Saxony Ice Co., Div. of Springfield Ice Co., Inc. v Ultimate Energy Rest. Corp.,*27 AD3d 445, 446 [2006]; *Swift v New York Med. Coll.,*25 AD3d 686, 687-688 [2006]). There are issues which are not conclusively resolved by the documentary evidence and the other evidentiary facts tendered by the plaintiffs, as to whether certain roofing work constituted necessary structural repairs for which the defendant was liable under the lease, and as to whether the attorney’s fee incurred by the defendant in defending this action constitute “expenses incurred ... in enforcing [the plaintiffs’] obligations under [the] lease.” Accordingly, the first and second counterclaims state a cause of action. Prudenti, PJ., Mastro, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (09-065)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee. The agenda topics for the meeting include:
      - Marshall Space Flight Center Perspective.
      - Constellation projects.
      - Committee subgroup reports.
      - Public comment.

# DATES:

                        Wednesday, July 29, 2009, 8 a.m.-4 p.m.                         **Note:**                         All times listed are local times.                    

# ADDRESSES:

The Davidson Center for Space Exploration, The U.S. Space & Rocket Center, One Tranquility Base, Huntsville, AL 35805, 256-837-3400.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Philip R. McAlister, Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546. Phone 202-358-0712.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room. It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

P. Diane Rausch,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

 [FR Doc. E9-16551 Filed 7-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5028

To allow a waiver or exemption of certain requirements for restricted airspace 

if security is not reduced. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2004

Mrs. JONES of Ohio (for herself, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. 

PASCRELL, and Mr. STRICKLAND) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To allow a waiver or exemption of certain requirements for 

restricted airspace if security is not reduced.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN RESTRICTED AIR SPACE WAIVER. 

4 Section 521(a)(2) of the Transportation, Treasury, 

5 and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 2004 

6 (Public Law 108–199, div. F) is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara8 graph (B)(v); 
2

•HR 5028 IH 

1 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub2 paragraph (C) and inserting the following: ‘‘; and’’; 

3 and 

4 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(D) to allow the operation of an aircraft 

6 participating in an air show in restricted air7 space if the Administrator of the Federal Avia8 tion Administration, in consultation with the 

9 Secretary of the Department of Homeland Se10 curity, determines that the safety of an event is 

11 not compromised.’’.

Æ
2 

•HR 5028 IH 

1 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub2 paragraph (C) and inserting the following: ‘‘; and’’; 

3 and 

4 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(D) to allow the operation of an aircraft 

6 participating in an air show in restricted air7 space if the Administrator of the Federal Avia8 tion Administration, in consultation with the 

9 Secretary of the Department of Homeland Se10 curity, determines that the safety of an event is 

11 not compromised.’’. 

Æ
Case 2:11-cr-00036-SDW Document 18 Filed 08/16/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 32
Case 2:11-cr-00036-SDW Document 18 Filed 08/16/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 33
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      David
      Rector, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on
      Form
      10-QSB of US
      Uranium Inc. ,
      for the
      fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents
      in
      all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of US
      Uranium Inc.


Date:
              September 14, 2007
            By:
            /s/
              David RectorDavid
                Rector,
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              and
                Principal Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-KSB (the
      "Report") of SBD International Inc . (the “Company”)
      for the fiscal
      year ended December 31, 2006, I, Carl M. Nurse, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:




1.
            The
                unaudited Report may not fully complies with the requirements of
                Section
                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report may not fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the Company.






Date: 
      July 30, 2008


/s/
      Carl
      M. Nurse


Carl
      M.
      Nurse


Chief
      Executive Officer


Chief
      Financial Officer







The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
      18 of
      the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as
      a
      separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AmTrust Financial Services,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald
Pipoly, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(a)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and




(b)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




By:
              /s/ Ronald
      PipolyRonald
      Pipoly
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                (Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)




November
9, 2009
**EXHIBIT
32.2**
  **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Airspan Networks, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Aronstam,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)  the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  ****Date: April
      27, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Peter
  AronstamPeter AronstamChief Financial
  Officer
Case 2:10-cr-00437-SRC Document 4 Filed 07/01/10 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 11
Case 2:10-cr-00437-SRC Document 4 Filed 07/01/10 Page 2 of 8 PageID: 12
Case 2:10-cr-00437-SRC Document 4 Filed 07/01/10 Page 3 of 8 PageID: 13
Case 2:10-cr-00437-SRC Document 4 Filed 07/01/10 Page 4 of 8 PageID: 14
Case 2:10-cr-00437-SRC Document 4 Filed 07/01/10 Page 5 of 8 PageID: 15
Case 2:10-cr-00437-SRC Document 4 Filed 07/01/10 Page 6 of 8 PageID: 16
Case 2:10-cr-00437-SRC Document 4 Filed 07/01/10 Page 7 of 8 PageID: 17
Case 2:10-cr-00437-SRC Document 4 Filed 07/01/10 Page 8 of 8 PageID: 18
H. R. 5105

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to carry out

construction and related activities in support of the collaborative Very Energetic

Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System (VERITAS) project on Kitt Peak near

Tucson, Arizona.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING BOARD OF REGENTS OF SMITHSONIAN

INSTITUTION TO CARRY OUT CONSTRUCTION AND

RELATED ACTIVITIES IN SUPPORT OF VERITAS ASTROPHYSICAL OBSERVATORY PROJECT.

The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution is authorized to carry out construction and related activities in support

of the collaborative Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope

Array System (VERITAS) project on Kitt Peak near Tucson,

Arizona.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

There is authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 for fiscal

year 2005 to carry out section 1.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 23 PageID: 1
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 2 of 23 PageID: 2
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 3 of 23 PageID: 3
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 4 of 23 PageID: 4
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 5 of 23 PageID: 5
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 6 of 23 PageID: 6
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 7 of 23 PageID: 7
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 8 of 23 PageID: 8
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 9 of 23 PageID: 9
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 10 of 23 PageID: 10
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 11 of 23 PageID: 11
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 12 of 23 PageID: 12
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 13 of 23 PageID: 13
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 14 of 23 PageID: 14
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 15 of 23 PageID: 15
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 16 of 23 PageID: 16
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 17 of 23 PageID: 17
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 18 of 23 PageID: 18
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 19 of 23 PageID: 19
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 20 of 23 PageID: 20
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 21 of 23 PageID: 21
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 22 of 23 PageID: 22
Case 2:11-cv-02595-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 23 of 23 PageID: 23
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4968 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4968

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 25 McHenry Street in Rosine, Kentucky, as the ``Bill Monroe Post 
                               Office''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4968

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 25 McHenry Street in Rosine, Kentucky, as the ``Bill Monroe Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 25 
McHenry Street in Rosine, Kentucky, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Bill Monroe Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Bill Monroe Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 6, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of RathGibson, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harley B. Kaplan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:  December 14, 2006/s/ Harley B. KaplanHarley B. KaplanPresident and Chief Executive Officer