alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, W. Craig Turner, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of MedPro Safety Products,  Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not  misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information  included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and  for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and  procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed  under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within  those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being  prepared; and

      (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the  registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this  report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and  procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such  evaluation; and 

      (d) Disclosed in this report any change  in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred  during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth  fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control  over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based  on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board  of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting  which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to  record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the  registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

| Date: August 13, 2008 | /s/ W. Craig Turner                  |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                  |                                      |
|                  | W. Craig Turner                      |
|                  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

28

----
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

M ARK ALAN BLAIR

,

Appellant

,

v.

R ITA GAIL BLAIR

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 19

- 00 304

- C V

Appeal from the

112 th District Court

of Reagan C ounty, Texas

(TC# 1870 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s motion to clarify the deadline for filing th e brief

which has been const rued as a motion for extension of time within which to file the brief until

March 5 , 2021

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO F ILE THE

APPELLANT ’S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Rebecca Davis

, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare the

Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before March 5 , 2021

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 2 th day of February , 20 2 1

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.3
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GLG Partners, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Jeffrey M. RojekJeffrey M. RojekChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 I, Noam Gottesman, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GLG Partners, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  November 9, 2009
    /s/ Noam GotttesmanNoam GottesmanChairman of the Board and
Co-Chief Executive Officer
#### Kun Yong Ke, Respondent, v Oversea Chinese Mission, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[855 NYS2d 173]

This personal injury action arises out of injuries sustained by the plaintiff on February 9, 2004, when he allegedly fell from a ladder while repairing leaks on the roof of the Boon Church, owned and operated by the appellant Oversea Chinese Mission, Inc.

*509Labor Law § 240 (1) imposes liability upon a contractor or owner who fails to provide required safety devices to a worker at an elevated work site where the lack of such devices is a substantial factor in causing the worker’s injuries, even where the contractor or owner exercises no supervision, direction, or control over the work being done (see *Zimmer v Chemung County Performing Arts,*65 NY2d 513 [1985]; *Madden v Trustees of Duryea Presbyt. Church,*210 AD2d 382 [1994]). Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the plaintiffs work in repairing the leak on the church’s roof, wherein he allegedly fell off a ladder and sustained his injuries, comes within the ambit of Labor Law § 240 (1). As the appellant failed to establish its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the cause of action based upon Labor Law § 240 (1), the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the appellant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing that cause of action. There exists a triable issue of fact as to whether the ladder the plaintiff was utilizing was secured and whether the plaintiff was supplied with the proper safety equipment. The Supreme Court also properly denied that branch of the appellant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 241 (6). The appellant failed to establish, prima facie, that the plaintiff had not sufficiently predicated his claim on a specific violation of the Industrial Code, since the plaintiff alleged that the appellant violated Industrial Code (12 NYCRR) § 23-1.21 (b) (4) (iv) *(see Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co.,*81 NY2d 494 [1993]). Mastro, J.P., Florio, Miller and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 135 

To prioritize the allocation of H–2B visas for States with low unemployment 

rates. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 15, 2019 

Mr. THUNE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prioritize the allocation of H–2B visas for States with 

low unemployment rates. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prioritizing Help to 

5 Businesses Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 135 IS

1 SEC. 2. PRIORITIZING THE ALLOCATION OF H–2B VISAS 

2 FOR STATES WITH LOW UNEMPLOYMENT 

3 RATES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 214(g)(10) of the Immi5 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(10)) is 

6 amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(10)(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) 

8 and (C), the numerical limitation under paragraph (1)(B) 

9 shall not apply to H–2B visas issued to aliens for positions 

10 that are certified for employment pursuant to subpart A 

11 of part 655 of title 20, Code of Federal Regulations, to 

12 perform service or labor in a State that had a seasonally 

13 adjusted unemployment rate of 3.5 percent or lower in 3 

14 of the 5 most recent monthly reports issued by the Bureau 

15 of Labor Statistics in the previous fiscal year. 

16 ‘‘(B) The number of aliens exempted from the numer17 ical limitation pursuant to subparagraph (A) in any State 

18 during any fiscal year may not exceed the lesser of— 

19 ‘‘(i) 125 percent of the number of visas issued 

20 to aliens working in such State during the most re21 cently concluded fiscal year; or 

22 ‘‘(ii) 2,500. 

23 ‘‘(C) If more H–2B visa applications are received in 

24 a fiscal year on behalf of aliens desiring to work in a State 

25 described in subparagraph (A) than the limit set forth in 

26 subparagraph (B)— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 135 IS

1 ‘‘(i) eligible applicants, in a number equal to 

2 such limit, shall be selected, by lottery, from such 

3 applications for the exemption under subparagraph 

4 (A); and 

5 ‘‘(ii) the remaining applicants shall be subject 

6 to the numerical limitation under paragraph 

7 (1)(B).’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) shall take place on the first day of the first 

10 fiscal year beginning after the date of the enactment of 

11 this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;      and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|                              | MEPRO      SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                              |                             |   |
| Dated:       August 13, 2009 | By:                              | /s/      W. Craig Turner |   |
|                              |                             |  W.      Craig Turner |
|                              |                             |  Chief      Executive Officer |

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-11425 Conference Calendar

JOSEPH REED, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus WAYNE SCOTT, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:97-CV-132

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1998 Before DAVIS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Joseph Reed, Texas inmate # 634538, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint as frivolous. Reed, who is assigned to an administrative segregation unit, challenges the constitutionality of restrictions on his diet, exercise, and right to keep personal property in his cell. Having reviewed the record and Reed’s appellate brief, we AFFIRM for essentially the reasons adopted by the district court. ReedNo. 97-11425 -2- v. Scott , No. 7-97-CV-0132-X (N.D. Tex. Sept. 19, 1997, and October 16, 1997).
AFFIRMED.
1132838.1

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN 

& DICKER, LLP

Robert P. Lesko

Karen D. Peck

33 Washington Street

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Tel: (973) 624-0800

Fax: (973) 624-0808

Local Counsel:

COOLEY MANION JONES LLP

Jason A. Cincilla (#4232)

Amaryah K. Bocchino (#4879)

1105 North Market Street, Suite 200 

Wilmington, DE 19801

Phone: (302) 657-2100 

Fax: (302) 657-2104

Attorneys for Movants,

American General Life Insurance Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY

Plaintiff,

vs.

STANLEY MANN, THE STANLEY MANN 

2007 INSURANCE TRUST, CHRISTIANA 

BANK & TRUST CO., as Trustee, and JOHN 

DOES 1- 10,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Misc. No. 11-cv-1057

(Case Pending in the District of Delaware)

(Civil Action No: 1:09-cv-00434-GMS)

NOTICE OF MOTION TO SEAL 

CERTAIN DOCUMENTS

TO: William T. Walsh, Clerk

United States District Court

50 Walnut Street

Newark, NJ 07101

Andre G. Castaybert, Esq.

Levi Lubarsky & Feigenbaum LLP

Case 2:11-cv-01057-PGS -ES Document 2 Filed 02/24/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 22
1132838.1

1185 Avenue of the Americas

17th Floor

New York, NY 1036

Elise Yablonski, Esq.

Marc Rosenthal, Esq.

Proskauer Rose LLP

Eleven Times Square

New York, New York 10036-8299

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on March 21, 2011, the undersigned attorneys for 

plaintiff, American General Life Insurance Company (“American General”) shall move 

before this Court for an Order to Seal Exhibit A; and Exhibits C through F; and 

Exhibit I to American General’s Motion to Compel Ravi Dattatreya’s compliance with a 

subpoena.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the undersigned attorneys will rely 

upon this Notice of Motion, Certification of Robert P. Lesko in Support of Motion, and 

proposed Form of Order in support thereof. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the undersigned requests oral 

argument in the event of opposition. 

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

____s/ Karen D. Peck_____

Karen D. Peck

Dated: February 25, 2010

Case 2:11-cv-01057-PGS -ES Document 2 Filed 02/24/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 23
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Palace Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (the Company), a Delaware corporation,for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Alexander Weber,Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

1.                                    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and forthe periods presented in the Report.

The foregoing certification is provided solely forpurposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any otherpurpose.
| Signature | ** **                | **Title** | ** **              | **Date** |
|-----------|---------------------------|-----------|-------------------------|----------|
| By:       | /s/ Alexander Weber,  Jr. |      | Chief Executive Officer |     | May 14, 2007 |
|      | Alexander Weber, Jr.      |      |                    |     |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Palace Entertainment Holdings, Inc. andwill be retained by Palace Entertainment Holdings, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or staff upon request.

----
#### J. W. Vail v. The City of Attica.

No. 403.

Void *Statute*— Development *Bonds.*“ Chapter 114 of the Laws of 1887, entitled ‘An act authorizing counties and incorporated cities of the second and third class to encourage the development of the coal, natural gas and other resources of their localities, by subscribing to the stock of companies organized for such purposes,’ is unconstitutional and void.” *{City of Oeneseo v. Qas*Company, 55 Kan. 358, 40 Pac. 655.)

Error from Harper district court; G. W. McKay, judge.

Opinion filed May 12, 1899.

Affirmed.

*Chester I. Long,*for plaintiff in error.

*Sankey & Campbell,*for defendant in error.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schoonover, J.:

This action was commenced by J. W. Vail in the district court of Harper county to recover on a “prospecting bond” issued by the city of Attica in accordance with an act of the legislature of this state. The bond recites :

> “ This bond is one of a series of six bonds numbered from 1 to 6, inclusive, of like amount, tenor, and effect, executed and issued by the said city, and in accordance with an act of the legislature of the state of Kansas, entitled ‘An act authorizing counties and incorporated cities of the second and third classes to encourage the development of the coal, natural gas and other resources of their localities, by subscribing to the stock of companies organized for such purposes,' approved March 2, 1887.”

The serious question presented is the constitutionality of the act authorizing the issuance of the bonds. In the case of *City of Geneseo v. Gas Company, 55*Kan. 358, 40 Pac. 655, our supreme court has said:

> “ Chapter 114 of the Laws of 1887, entitled ‘An act *669authorizing counties and incorporated cities of the second and third class to encourage the development of the coal, natural gas and other resources of their localities by subscribing to the stock of companies organized for such purposes/ is unconstitutional and void.”

Relying on this authority, the judgment of the district court sustaining the demurrer to the petition of plaintiff below will be affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Exploration Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas Brady, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a member of the Board
of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




















/s/ Thomas Brady


Thomas Brady


Chief Executive Officer






April 14, 2010











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Exploration Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas Brady, Chief Financial Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




















/s/ Thomas Brady


Thomas Brady


Chief Financial Officer






April 14, 2010