alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 12.2



I, Joseph Shea, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of GigaMedia Limited;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

     (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control
          over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
          the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over
          financial reporting; and

5.   The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
          control over financial reporting.


Date: June 30, 2004


/s/ JOSEPH SHEA
------------------------------
Name: JOSEPH SHEA
Title: CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
14-09-00292-CR

Christopher Ray Barten

vs.

The State of Texas

ORDER

On this day, the Court on its own motion, requests that the 

mandate be recalled. Mandate was issued by the Clerk of this Court to 

Chris Daniel, District Clerk of Harris County, Texas in the above cause 

(being trial court number 1111900). This case was appealed from the 

232nd District Court, Harris County on April 1, 2009. The same having 

been considered, it is ordered that the Clerk of the 14th Court of 

Appeals, at Houston, recall the above mentioned mandate from the 

District Clerk of Harris County, Texas.

Signed: July 27, 2015

 

 CHRISTOPHER PRINE, CLERK
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Defentect Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, that:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 except that the financial statements included in
this Report have not been reviewed by an independent public accountant as
required by Regulation S-X; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:  November
      22, 2010
                    By:
                    /s/ James C. AckerlyJames
      C. Ackerly, Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Abram Janz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Blugrass Energy Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Blugrass Energy Inc.





By:
/s/ Abram JanzName:
Abram JanzTitle:
Chief Executive and Accounting Officer


August 20, 2012
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, Tatiana Mikitchuk, the President, Chief Executive Officer,
Treasurer and Director of Black Sea Oil, Inc. (the Company), certifies, under
the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                         |        |                                        
|------------------------ | ------ | ---------------------------------------
|Date: November
 12, 2008 |        |                                        
|                         |        |                                        
|                         | By:    | /s/ Tatiana
 Mikitchuk                 
|                         |        |                                        
|                         | Name:  | Tatiana
 Mikitchuk                     
|                         | Title: | President,
 Chief Executive Officer,   
|                         |        | Treasurer
 and Sole Director (Principal
|                         |        | Executive,
 Financial and Accounting   
|                         |        | Officer)                               

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

14

---
Case 3:11-cv-00647-LHG   Document 6   Filed 04/25/11   Page 1 of 4 PageID: 22

Case 3:11-cv-00647-LHG   Document 6   Filed 04/25/11   Page 2 of 4 PageID: 23

Case 3:11-cv-00647-LHG   Document 6   Filed 04/25/11   Page 3 of 4 PageID: 24

Case 3:11-cv-00647-LHG   Document 6   Filed 04/25/11   Page 4 of 4 PageID: 25
Case 2:10-cr-00424-FSH Document 13 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 32
Case 2:10-cr-00424-FSH Document 13 Filed 06/21/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 33
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KARTAR SINGH,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-72897

Agency No. A079-561-230

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 12, 2013** 

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Kartar Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

FILED

MAR 20 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-72897

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual

findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We grant

the petition for review and remand.

Because the BIA found Singh established past persecution, the government

had the burden to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that Singh could

avoid future persecution. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.13(b)(1)(ii), 1208.16(b)(1)(ii). In

evaluating changed country conditions, the BIA relied largely on evidence relating

generally to Sikhs and to Akali Dal Mann members or supporters and also found

that Singh was unlikely to be perceived as a hard-core militant based on driving a

truck for Akali Dal Mann. However, the police repeatedly accused Singh of

involvement with militants, during both of his detentions in the Punjab and Jammu

and when the Punjab police visited his family’s home looking for him after he was

released from detention in Jammu. Further, his testimony indicates he is the

subject of ongoing police interest. As the BIA did not take these circumstances

into account, we grant the petition for review and remand Singh’s asylum,

withholding of removal, and CAT claims for further proceedings consistent with

this disposition. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam);

Lopez v. Ashcroft, 366 F.3d 799, 805-07 (9th Cir. 2004) (stating BIA must provide

individualized analysis of how changed conditions affect specific petitioner’s
3 09-72897

situation and remanding where BIA determination was not sufficiently

individualized).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
Exhibit 32.1  Chief Executive and Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C., SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive and Financial Officer of Global Immune Technologies, Inc., (the Company), herby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   Dated: November 12, 2010 /s/ Donald Perks CEO and CFO
exhibit4b-10.htm


Exhibit 4(b)-10


AMENDMENT NO. 9


TO


PPL EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN







WHEREAS, PPL Services Corporation (“PPL”) has adopted the PPL Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“Plan”) effective January 1, 2000; and


WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated effective January 1, 2002, and subsequently amended by Amendment No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8; and


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:



	
I.  

	
Effective September 17, 2012, Appendix A is amended to read as follows:







 


Appendix A


 


Participating Company


 



	Name	Effective Date





 



	
1.

	
PPL Services Corporation

	
July 1, 2000


	
2.

	
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation

	
January 1, 1975


	
3.

	
PPL EnergyPlus, LLC

	
July 14, 1998


	
4.

	
PPL Generation, LLC

	
July 1, 2000


	
5.

	
PPL Brunner Island, LLC

	
July 1, 2000


	
6.

	
PPL Holtwood, LLC

	
July 1, 2000


	
7.

	
PPL Martins Creek, LLC

	
July 1, 2000


	
8.

	
PPL Montour, LLC

	
July 1, 2000


	
9.

	
PPL Susquehanna, LLC

	
July 1, 2000


	
10.

	
PPLSolutions, LLC

	
January 1, 2002


	
11.

	
PPL Telcom, LLC

	
February 5, 2001


	
12.

	
Lower Mount Bethel Energy, LLC

	
September 30, 2002


	
13.

	
PPL Edgewood Energy, LLC

	
April 1, 2003


	
14.

	
PPL Maine, LLC

	
April 1, 2003


	
15.

	
PPL Wallingford Energy, LLC

	
April 1, 2003


	
16.

	
PPL Development Company, LLC

	
January 1, 2006


	
17.

	
PPL Global, LLC

	
January 1, 2006


	
18.

	
PPL Energy Services Group, LLC

	
September 25, 2006


	
19.

	
PPL Interstate Energy Company

	
January 1, 2008


	
20.

	
PPL Strategic Development, LLC

	
January 1, 2012


	
21.

	
PPL EnergyPlus Retail, LLC

	
June 23, 2011


	
22.

	
PPL Energy Supply, LLC

	
September 17, 2012






















II.      Except as provided in this Amendment No. 9, all other provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 9 is executed this ____  day of _____________, 2012.


 


 



	  	  	
PPL SERVICES CORPORATION


	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	
By:

	  
	  	  	
               Mark F. Wilten


	  	  	
               Vice President-Finance & Treasurer
909 A.2d 721

#### PATRICIA LIGUORI, ETC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. ELLIE ELMANN, M.D., JAMES B. HUNTER, M.D., AND CARDIAC SURGER GROUP, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND PETER PRAEGER, M.D., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

October 20, 2006.

This matter having come before the Court on an appeal as of right based on a partial dissent from the judgment of the Appellate Division

*486And plaintiffs having properly sought certification on the issues not included in the dissent,

And good cause appearing;

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Seligman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of RADVision Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: March 30, 2003

/s/David Seligman*
------------------
David Seligman
Chief Financial Officer


* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
(Docket Entry No. 5) 

 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

CAMDEN VICINAGE

 

___________________________________ 

 : 

GLORIA J. MONTANA, : 

 : 

 Plaintiff, : Civil No. 11-1394 (RBK/JS) 

 : 

 v. : ORDER

 : 

ACRA TURF CLUB, LLC d/b/a : 

FAVORITES AT VINELAND, et al., : 

 : 

 Defendants. : 

___________________________________ : 

THIS MATTER HAVING COME BEFORE THE COURT on the motion of 

Plaintiff Gloria J. Montana (“Plaintiff”) to remand this case, removed by Defendants ACRA Turf 

Club, LLC d/b/a Favorites at Vineland, et al (“Defendants”), to the Superior Court of New Jersey, 

Camden County, Docket No: CAM-L-683-11; and the Court having considered the moving papers 

and the opposition thereto; and for the reasons expressed in the opinion issued this date; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to remand is GRANTED; and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs in 

connection with this Motion for Remand is DENIED. 

Dated: 10/4/11 /s/ Robert B. Kugler 

 ROBERT B. KUGLER 

 United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01394-RBK-JS Document 23 Filed 10/04/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 269
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2011 of DoMark
International, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: January 23, 2012                  By: /s/ William Seery
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             William Seery
                                             Chief Financial Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to DoMark
International, Inc. and will be retained by DoMark International, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT WILLIAM JOHN VANDORNICK, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-1254 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed October 9, 2015. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; George C. Richards, Judge. William John Vandornick, pro se.
MORRIS, Judge.

We affirm the order dismissi ng William John Vandornick's motio n filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 without prejudic e to his timely refiling his motion now that the direct appeal of his judgment and sente nce has concluded. See Daniels v. State, 712 So. 2d 765, 765 (Fla. 1998) (holding that during the pendency of a direct appeal, a trial court is without jurisdiction to rule on a postconviction motion).

SILBERMAN and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Joint Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted via conference call. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, February 25, 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Susan Gilbert at (404) 338-7185. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Joint Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (TAP) will be held Wednesday, February 25, 2009, at 3 p.m. Eastern Time via a conference call. If you would like to have the Joint Committee of TAP consider a written statement, please call (404) 338-7185 or write Susan Gilbert, TAP Office, Stop 211-D, 401 West Peachtree Street NW., Atlanta, GA, 30308-3520, or Fax to (404) 338-8691, or you can contact us at                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     For information to join the Joint Committee meeting, contact Susan Gilbert.                 

The agenda will include the following: Discussion of issues and responses brought to the Joint Committee, office report, and discussion of annual meeting. 

                        Dated:                         *December 22, 2008.*

Roy L. Block, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

 [FR Doc. E9-162 Filed 1-8-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P