alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Certification of

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Samuel L. Westover, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sonic Innovations, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008:



| | (1) | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sonic Innovations, Inc.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 13, 2009



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ SAMUEL L. WESTOVER              
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)       

I, Michael M. Halloran, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sonic Innovations, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008:



| | (1) | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sonic Innovations, Inc.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 13, 2009



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL M. HALLORAN      
|Vice President and           
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Baoshinn Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending June 30, 2012, I, Benny Kan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2012, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 13, 2012

Baoshinn Corporation



By:  /s/ Benny Kan

Benny Kan
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel VITA Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 10, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or (718) 488-3557.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel VITA Issue Committee will be held Tuesday, February 10, 2009, at 2 p.m. Eastern Time. You can submit written comments to the panel by faxing to (718) 488-2062, or by mail to Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, 10 Metro Tech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or you can contact us at                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     Public comments will also be welcome during the meeting. Please contact Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or (718) 488-3557 for additional information.                

The agenda will include the following: Various VITA Issues.

Dated: December 22, 2008.

Roy L. Block,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

 [FR Doc. E9-167 Filed 1-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gulf & Orient Steamship
Company, Ltd. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), we, Michael Vardakis, President and
Melissa Ladakis, Secretary/Treasurer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.


Dated: 11/8/2006                          /s/Michael Vardakis
      ----------                          -------------------------
                                          Michael Vardakis
                                          President and Director


Dated: 11/8/2006                          /s/Melissa Ladakis
      ----------                          -------------------------
                                          Melissa Ladakis
                                          Secretary and Treasurer
MICHAEL F. DURANTE, et a!., ORDER

I)efendarns.

UPON application of the United States (AUSA Anthony Mahajan appearing) for an order

permitting the DEA to proceed to process in the form of text messages the Blackberry of TFO

Izzo in the DEA laboratory, and upon notice to defendants (Cathy Fleming, Esq. appearing for

Michael Durante), and ftllowing a conference with counsel for the Government and defendant

Durante,

IT IS this /I day of February, 2012

ORDERED that

1. the Government make two (2) mirror images of the 1PD file resident on the Izzo

Blackberry;

2. the Government shall segregate and secure one copy of the image ofthe IPD file;

3. the Government shall segregate and secure the original izzo Blackberry in its

possession;

4. all forensic work by the Government’s laboratory shall be done on the nonsecured imaged IPD file; and

5, the original izzo Blackberry shall be preserved and no work will be performed on

the phone itself until further order of the Court.

SO ORDERED.
#### Crocker *v.*Cutter Tower Co.

*(Circuit Court, D. Massachusetts.*

December 23, 1886.)

Patents for Inventions—Infringement—No. 16,312—Easel Design.

In an action for infringing patent No. 16,312, dated October 6, 1885, for a design for easels, the plaintiff’s design consisted in the upright standards crossing at the upper ends, representing the stems and flowers of the cat-tail plant. Easels made of the natural cat-tails thus crossing are old. In defendant’s design, the standards are not crossed, but held together by a band. *Meld,*no infringement, since the plaintiff was not the first to use cat-tails, and defendant’s design did not infringe his specific device of crossing them.

In Equity.

*C. H. Drew*and *W. B. Durant,*for complainant. °

*C. C. Morgan*and *O. M. Shaw,*for defendant.

Before Colt and Carpenter, JJ.

Colt, J.

This suit is brought upon letters patent No. 16,312, dated October 6,1885, granted to the complainant for a design for easels. The leading feature of the design consists in the upright standards of the easel crossed near their upper ends, and representing the stems and flowers of the cat-tail plant or flag. The claim is as follows:

> *457“The design for an easel herein shown and described, the same consisting of the upright standards of an easel crossing each other near their upper ends, and representing the stems and flowers of the cat-tail plant or flag.”

Easels made of natural cat-tails crossing each other near their upper ends are old. In view of this, the Crocker design must be limited to the mode of crossing the standards described in the patent. In defendant’s design the standards are not crossed, but they are held together near tlie top by a band, from which point, by bending, they are spread out so as to present a fan-like appearance. If Crocker liad been the first to design an easel made of cat-tails crossing each other, it might properly be held that the defendant’s design infringed from the general resemblance between the two. In view, however, of what was old, we have grave doubts whether the claim of the paient constitutes any invention; but, assuming the patentability of the design, we are clear that it must be limited to the mode of crossing the standards found in the specification and drawing, and, the defendant not using any form of crossing the standards, there can be no infringement, and the bill must be dismissed.
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 63 Filed 06/30/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 551
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 63 Filed 06/30/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 552
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 511 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 29811
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 511 Filed 05/09/18 Page 2 of 15 PageID: 29812
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 511 Filed 05/09/18 Page 3 of 15 PageID: 29813
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 511 Filed 05/09/18 Page 4 of 15 PageID: 29814
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 511 Filed 05/09/18 Page 5 of 15 PageID: 29815
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 511 Filed 05/09/18 Page 6 of 15 PageID: 29816
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 511 Filed 05/09/18 Page 7 of 15 PageID: 29817
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 511 Filed 05/09/18 Page 8 of 15 PageID: 29818
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 511 Filed 05/09/18 Page 9 of 15 PageID: 29819
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 511 Filed 05/09/18 Page 10 of 15 PageID: 29820
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 511 Filed 05/09/18 Page 11 of 15 PageID: 29821
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 511 Filed 05/09/18 Page 12 of 15 PageID: 29822
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 511 Filed 05/09/18 Page 13 of 15 PageID: 29823
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 511 Filed 05/09/18 Page 14 of 15 PageID: 29824
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 511 Filed 05/09/18 Page 15 of 15 PageID: 29825
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5009 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5009

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2004

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To extend water contracts between the United States and specific 
 irrigation districts and the City of Helena in Montana, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Montana Water Contracts Extension 
Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF WATER CONTRACTS.

    (a) Authority to Extend.--The Secretary of the Interior may extend 
each of the water contracts listed in subsection (b) until the earlier 
of--
            (1) the expiration of the 2-year period beginning on the 
        date on which the contract would expire but for this section; 
        or
            (2) the date on which a new long-term water contract is 
        executed by the parties to the contract listed in subsection 
        (b).
    (b) Extended Contracts.--The water contracts referred to in 
subsection (a) are the following:
            (1) Contract Number 14-06-600-2078, as amended, for 
        purchase of water between the United States of America and the 
        City of Helena, Montana.
            (2) Contract Number 14-06-600-2079, as amended, between the 
        United States of America and the Helena Valley Irrigation 
        District for water service.
            (3) Contract Number 14-06-600-8734, as amended, between the 
        United States of America and the Toston Irrigation District for 
        water service.
            (4) Contract number 14-06-600-3592, as amended, between the 
        United States and the Clark Canyon Water Supply Company, Inc., 
        for water service and for a supplemental supply.
            (5) Contract number 14-06-600-3593, as amended, between the 
        United States and the East Bench Irrigation District for water 
        service.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert SKEFFERY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11-50553.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 3, 2012.

Filed Dec. 14, 2012.

Charlotte E. Kaiser, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

*695William R. Burgener, Law Office of William R. Burgener, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: BERZON, CLIFTON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

The government appeals the district court’s order granting in part Robert Skef-fery’s motion to dismiss an indictment for attempted re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731. *See United States v. Gonzalez-Valerio,*342 F.3d 1051, 1052 (9th Cir.2003). Reviewing de novo, *see id.*at 1053, we reverse and remand.

Skeffery’s collateral attack on his deportation order fails because he has not demonstrated that he was prejudiced by the Immigration Judge’s failure to inform him of potential relief from deportation under former § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.1*See id.*at 1054. Because of his serious criminal history, Skeffery would have had to demonstrate outstanding or unusual equities to receive § 212(c) relief. *See id.*at 1056-57. Skeffery’s equities, which consist of long-term residence in and family ties to the United States, are not outstanding or unusual, so he lacks a plausible ground for relief. *See id.*at 1057; *see also Ayala-Chavez v. INS,*944 F.2d 638, 641-42 (9th Cir.1991).

Skeffery’s alternate argument, that he was not advised of the possibility of voluntary departure, lacks merit. To qualify for voluntary departure, Skeffery would have had to establish “good moral character.” 8 U.S.C. § 1254(e)(1) (1994) (repealed by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRI-RA)). But his 2003 drug-related conviction, which was sustained within the five years preceding his May 2007 deportation hearing, precluded him from meeting this requirement. *See*8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(f)(3), 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II), 1254(e)(1) (1994). Although IIRIRA added a second form of voluntary departure that does not require a showing of good moral character, *see*8 U.S.C. § 1229c(a)(1), Skeffery was not eligible for this form of voluntary departure because his deportation proceedings commenced before the effective date of IIRI-RA. *See Pascua v. Holder,*641 F.3d 316, 319 (9th Cir.2011) (holding that IIRIRA’s transitional rules “instruct courts not to apply IIRIRA in proceedings that began before the statute’s effective date”).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Because Skeffery’s deportation proceedings began prior to the effective date of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), the proceedings were governed by pre-IIRIRA law.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Douglas Emmett, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------- |  | -----------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 7, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ WILLIAM KAMER
|                       |  |  |  |    
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  | William Kamer          
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  | Douglas Emmett, Inc.   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

District ofNew Jersey

Chambers of Martin Luther King Jr. William H. Walls Federal Courthouse District Judge 50 Walnut Street

Newark, New Jersey 07102

(973) 645-2564

(973) 645-3436 Fax

March 12, 2013

Kevin Marino, Esq.Marino Tortorella & Boyle, PC

437 Southern Boulevard

Chatham, NJ 07928-1488

Re: United States v. Kurlander, et al., 2:11 -cr-3 1 5-WHW

Dear Mr. Marino:

Because ofthe tight scheduling of trials following Kurlander, I remain unable to grant

your request for an adjournment of the trial to April 8, 2013. This case remains scheduled for

trial before me on March 19, 2013.

Yours t1 ., ) I / ///

K

-WitdSfàttrictJudge

cc: All Counsel of Record (via ECF)
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 OMNIVISION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 Subsidiaries of OmniVision Technologies, Inc.
  Jurisdiction of
    
    PercentageName of Subsidiary
    
    Incorporation
    
    OwnershipOmniVision International Holding Ltd.
    
    Cayman Islands
    
    100%HuaWei
Technology International, Ltd.
(formerly OmniView Technology International, Ltd.)
    
    Cayman Islands
    
    100%OmniVision Technologies (Hong Kong) Company Limited
    
    Hong Kong, China
    
    100%OmniVision Trading (Hong Kong) Company Limited
    
    Hong Kong, China
    
    100%HuaWei
Semiconductor (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
(formerly OmniView Electronic (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.)
    
    China
    
    100%Shanghai OmniVision IC Design Co., Ltd.
    
    China
    
    100%CDM Optics, Inc.
    
    Colorado
    
    100%
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
of Franklin Towers Enterprises Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Dingliang Kuang





Dingliang
Kuang


Chief
Executive Officer


Chief
Financial Officer




November
18, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Franklin Towers Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Franklin Towers
Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.