alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Thian Hoo Tan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Komag, Incorporated on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
28, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Komag, Incorporated.

            DATE:  March 5, 2004                   BY: /s/  Thian Hoo Tan
                   --------------                      --------------------

                                                   Thian Hoo Tan
                                                   Chief Executive Officer


      I, Kathleen A. Bayless, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Komag, Incorporated on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 28, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Komag, Incorporated.


            DATE:  March 5, 2004                   BY: /s/  Kathleen A. Bayless
                   --------------                      -----------------

                                                   Kathleen A. Bayless
                                                   Chief Financial Officer



      This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by Komag, Incorporated for purposes
of Section 18 of the Security Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Komag, Incorporated and will be retained by Komag, Incorporated and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 of Expedition
Leasing, Inc. (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerry Keller, President (Principal Executive Officer) and Treasurer (Principal Accounting Officer) of the
Company, certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Jerry Keller                                              
|Jerry Keller                                                  
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 14, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3927

_____________________________

JACOB M. VEAL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Angela M. Cox, Judge.

May 2, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

DENNIS DEAL, DC #T20922, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2247 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed March 20, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Mark D. Kiser, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed December 13, 2017

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D17-379

Lower Tribunal No. 15-4295

________________



### Teresita Abadin Lanza

, Appellant,

vs.



### Carlos Lanza

, Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade

County, Bernard S. Shapiro

, Judge.

Perez-Abreu & Martin-Lavielle, P.A., and Andy W. Acosta and Javier

Perez-Abreu

, for appellant.

Greene Smith Jean, P.A., and Cynthia L. Greene

, Laura Davis Smith, and

Alicia M. De La O, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and LOGUE and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.We affirm the trial court’s abatement of alimony and child support. We do

so with the understanding that the trial court’s oral pronouncement at the hearing

allows the former wife to conduct discovery and, if necessary, seek relief from the

trial court in relation to the propriety, amount, and duration of the abatement.

Affirmed.

2
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5017 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5017

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain capers preserved by vinegar 
                            or acetic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 7, 2004

 Mr. Pascrell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain capers preserved by vinegar 
                            or acetic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CAPERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.20.02       Capers, prepared   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         or preserved by                                                    31/2007
                         vinegar or acetic
                         acid, in
                         containers
                         holding 3.4 kg or
                         less (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2001.90.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Zevotek, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Adam J. Engel, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:  February
22, 2010




/s/ Adam J. EngelAdam
      J. Engel, President, Chief Executive Officer,
                Chief
      Financial Officer and
Director
EXHIBIT
      23.1





CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
      have
      issued our reports dated March 9, 2007 with respect to the consolidated
      financial statements and schedule of Airspan Networks, Inc. (which report
      expressed an unqualified opinion and contains an explanatory paragraph relating
      to the adoption of FAS 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”) and with respect to
      Airspan Networks, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal
      control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control
      over
      financial reporting included in the 2006 Annual Report of Airspan Networks,
      Inc.
      (Form 10-K). We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports
      in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006 of Airspan
      Networks, Inc.





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference of the aforementioned reports in
      the
      Registration Statements of Airspan Networks, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No.
      333-115788, effective May 24, 2004, File No. 333-62024, effective May 31, 2001,
      File No.333-62032 effective May 31, 2001, File No. 333-45260, effective
      September 6, 2000, File No. 333-45262, effective September 6, 2000) and Form
      S-3
      (File No. 333-140172, effective February 23, 2007).





Grant
      Thornton LLP


Miami,
      Florida


March
      9,
      2007
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00003-CR

JOCELYN HERNANDEZ APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 97TH DISTRICT COURT OF MONTAGUE COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 2015-0127M-CR

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Jocelyn Hernandez attempts to appeal from her conviction for 

aggravated assault.2 Hernandez pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea bargain, and 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2The trial court’s original judgment incorrectly stated that Hernandez was 

convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The trial court 

subsequently granted Hernandez’s “Motion To Modify, Correct, Or Reform 

Judgment” and ordered that the original judgment be reformed to strike out the 

language “with a deadly weapon.”
2

in accordance with the plea bargain, the trial court sentenced her to two years’ 

confinement. The trial court’s certification of her right to appeal states that this 

case “is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and “the 

defendant has waived the right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On January 8, 2016, we notified Hernandez that this appeal could be 

dismissed based on the trial court’s certification unless she or any party desiring 

to continue the appeal filed a response on or before January 19, 2016, showing 

grounds for continuing the appeal.3 See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. No 

response has been filed.

In accordance with the trial court’s certification, we therefore dismiss this 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).

/s/ Sue Walker

SUE WALKER

JUSTICE

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: March 3, 2016

 

3That same day, we also notified Hernandez that it appeared we lacked 

jurisdiction over this appeal because her notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a).
United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

____________________________________________

:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

Plaintiff : Criminal No. 11-134

:

vs. :

 : Order of Reassignment

JUSTIN BIRDSALL :

Defendant :

:

______________________________________________:

It is on this 9 day of June, 2014, 

th

O R D E R E D that the entitled action is reassigned

from Judge Dennis Cavanaugh to Judge Claire Cecchi. 

 s/Jerome B. Simandle 

Jerome B. Simandle, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Case 2:11-cr-00134-CCC Document 19 Filed 06/09/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 44
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DoMar Exotic Furnishings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: March 21, 2007


/s/ Maureen Doyle Sieck
-----------------------------------------
Maureen Doyle Sieck, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 12.2

CFO SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Hilarion V. Cajucom, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of PSi Technologies Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The companys other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of
companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys
internal control over financial reporting.

March 14, 2008



|       |  |                                
|------ |  | -------------------------------
|By:    |  | /S/    HILARION V. CAJUCOM,
JR.
|Name:  |  | Hilarion V. Cajucom, Jr.       
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6597

PATRICK EUGENE ALLRED,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

BONNIE BOYETTE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (5:05-hc-00232-BO)

Submitted: October 20, 2006 Decided: November 16, 2006

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles R. Brewer, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Mary

Carla Hollis, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Eugene Allred seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Allred has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Defentect Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge,
that:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:  December
      7, 2010
                    By:
                    /s/ James C. AckerlyJames
      C. Ackerly, Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
PROB I2A

(7/93)

United States District Court

for

District of New Jersey

Report on Offender Under Supervision

Name of Offender: Chi-Won Jeon Cr.: 11 -00216-001

PACTS#: 59174

Name of Sentencing Judicial Officer: THE HONORABLE KATHARINE S. HAYDEN

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Date of Original Sentence: 01/23/2014

Original Offense: Conspiracy to Unlawfully Produce Identification Documents and Commit Credit Card

Fraud, and Aggravated Identity Theft.

Original Sentence: 60 months probation

Special Conditions: 300 hours Community Service, New Debt Restrictions, $200 Special Assessment, and

$231,258.85 in Restitution.

Type of Supervision: Probation Date Supervision Commenced: 01/23/2014

STATUS REPORT

Ms. Jeon currently resides in Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, and she has been employed with

International Intimates since September 2010. We believe that Ms. Jeon has paid the court-ordered

restitution to the best of her financial ability. To date, she has paid $20,905.01 towards the

restitution balance. It should be noted that should her term of supervision expire as scheduled, her

case will be referred to the U.S. Attorney's Office, Financial Litigation Unit, for the collection of

any outstanding criminal monetary penalties.

Recommendation: It is respectfully requested that Your Honor take no further action and allow

Ms. Jeon's term of supervision to expire as scheduled on January 22, 2019.

Respectfully submitted,

MicAMe. SiedziA

By: Michelle A Siedzik

U.S. Probation Officer

Date: 10/16/2018
Prob 12A - page 2

Chi-Won Jeon

Please check a box below to indicate the Court's direction regarding action to be taken in this case:

No Formal Court Action to be Taken at This Time - Supervision to Expire on January 22,2019.

P Submit a Request for Modifying the Conditions or Term of Supervision

P Submit a Request for Warrant or Summons

P Other

Signature of udicial Officer

loKrj
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Coronado Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June
30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Alejandro Quesada, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this
certification as of the 6th day of August, 2008.  Alejandro Quesada Chief Executive Officer    Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Coronado Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June
30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Shawn Phillips, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this
certification as of the 6th day of August, 2008.  Shawn Phillips Chief Financial Officer