alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
------------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert C. Howell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Organetix, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
      being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
      the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.


Date: April 20, 2006


/s/ Robert C. Howell
----------------------------------
Name: Robert C. Howell
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 29 Filed 10/18/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 540
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Criminal No. 11-164 (KSH)

Anselmo Genovese, ORDER

Defendant.

Defendant Anselmo Genovese, through his counsel, Gerald 

L.Shargel, Esq., having applied to the Court for a modification of 

the terms of his home confinement imposed as a special condition 

of his eight month probationary term; and the government (Leslie 

Faye Schwartz, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing) having filed 

opposition; and after considering the papers submitted the Court 

finding that the proposed modification does not have meaningful 

support beyond the convenience of the defendant; and good cause 

thereby appearing,

IT IS on this 27th day of August, 2012,

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH Document 35 Filed 08/27/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 224
ORDERED that the defendant’s application to modify the terms 

of his home confinement is denied.

/s/ Katharine S. Hayden 

KATHARINE S. HAYDEN

United States District Judge

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH Document 35 Filed 08/27/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 225
Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 37   Filed 08/02/13   Page 1 of 3 PageID: 227

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 37   Filed 08/02/13   Page 2 of 3 PageID: 228

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 37   Filed 08/02/13   Page 3 of 3 PageID: 229
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

GLENN A. ROTHENBERG,

Plaintiff,

v.

BREVARD FINANCIAL, LTD., et al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action No. 10-6622 (SRC)

OPINION & ORDER

CHESLER, District Judge

This matter comes before the Court on the motion to remand filed by Plaintiff Glenn A.

Rothenberg (“Plaintiff”) [docket entry no. 3]. Defendant Steven Pasternak (“Defendant”) has

opposed the motion. The Court has considered the papers submitted by the parties and opts to

rule on the motion without oral argument, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. For

the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant Plaintiff’s motion to remand this action. 

This action was removed by Defendant by a petition filed December 21, 2010. The

petition asserts that the matter is removable because it asserts claims arising under federal

securities law and it therefore asserts a claim under federal jurisdiction. The Plaintiff has moved

to remand on numerous grounds, including that the removal petition was filed more than 30 days

after Defendant received notice of the federal claim “through service or otherwise.” Plaintiff

further contends that Defendant’s removal was also defective under the well established

Case 2:10-cv-06622-SRC-MAS Document 11 Filed 02/23/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 224
unanimity requirement which provides that a defendant may only remove a matter where all

properly served defendants join in the removal petition. Defendant Pasternak’s sole opposition

to the remand motion is the assertion that the state court does not have jurisdiction over federal

securities law claims. Thus, Mr. Pasternak does not dispute that his removal petition did not

properly join the other Defendants that were named and served. Since this procedural defect was

timely raised, the motion to remand must be granted. In light of the foregoing, the Court sees no 1

need to file Mr. Pasternak’s application for in forma pauperis, which was filed under seal. The

Court notes that under Local Civil Rule 5.3(c) no filing in a civil case may be made under seal

absent a formal motion

For these reasons,

IT IS on this 23 day of February, 2011, rd

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for remand [docket entry no. 3] be and hereby is

GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that this case be and hereby is REMANDED to the Superior Court of New

Jersey, Law Division, Morris County.

 s/Stanley R. Chesler 

STANLEY R. CHESLER

United States District Judge

Defendant’s contention that federal securities claims may not be pursued in state court 1

along with other bases for his motion to dismiss currently pending before this Court can be

appropriately decided by the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Morris County on

remand. 

2

Case 2:10-cv-06622-SRC-MAS Document 11 Filed 02/23/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 225
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,986
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,066
<ALLOWANCES>                                        91
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          36,212
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,223
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,267
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,474
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,567
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,005
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (49)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  47
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,031
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,031
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,031
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.76
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW   Document 149-2   Filed 06/15/15   Page 1 of 5 PageID: 7441

Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW   Document 149-2   Filed 06/15/15   Page 2 of 5 PageID: 7442

Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW   Document 149-2   Filed 06/15/15   Page 3 of 5 PageID: 7443

Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW   Document 149-2   Filed 06/15/15   Page 4 of 5 PageID: 7444

Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW   Document 149-2   Filed 06/15/15   Page 5 of 5 PageID: 7445
Exhibit 32

Certification of

Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Samuel L. Westover, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Otix Global, Inc. for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008:



| | (1) | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Otix
Global, Inc.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 15, 2010



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/S/ SAMUEL L.
WESTOVER              
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)       

I,
Michael M. Halloran, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Otix Global, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008:



| | (1) | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Otix
Global, Inc.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 15, 2010



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/S/ MICHAEL M.
HALLORAN      
|Vice President and           
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)
U) Di it ci it

N Di Di C) C)

o it

0

0

0 it it C) C) C) ci it C) hi it it C) C) U) it CD it CD

0

0 CD it H)

C ci C) C) C) hi hi Di H0 U) it

C CD it it

C

0

0

C

C hi

0

H U) C)

CD C)

H it U)

0 CD CD H- Di DY

it C) C) CD C) C) C) C)

C it H- U) U)

C) it

0 it C) U) ci C) H- ci

H - CD U) U)

0

0

C CD

0 it U) Di it

C

C

<

H

Di CD hi

C U)

0 U)

C Di Di Di it U)

C

C

C C) hi ci C)

C

0 it C) U)

C) it

0 U) it CD C) C) C) it it

0

Di CD hi

H U) C) CD

C CD C)

0

o it

C U) CD Di ci Di C) it C) hi

H U)

hi it C) U) C) it C) hi ci C) CD U)

hi CD U) hi

0 H0 CD it C)

cC CD Di it

C it

C

C CD Di C)

hi C)

C

0

0 Di C)

C C) C)

C

< U)

o C) hi U) hi CD C)

0 C) H- U)

hi CD CC - CD

< Di

C it

DI) it it U) ci it CD

C C) C)

Di (I) C) C) U) IS CD it it hi it U) hi CD

0 U)

C

0 CD DI

H hi

0 CI it hi

C C)

0 U) C) it C) CD it CD Di CD

N

C itH

C

C it C)

C Di

C

C U) CD C) C) IC) H- C) C) it C) C) it it

H Di hi it CD Di U) H- ci

0 C)

it CD hi it

C

0

N

- U) CD 0U)

N C) Di C) C)

C U) it • U) NJ it CD C) Di U)

0

it U) C) C) C) hi

C hi it

Di CD it it CD

C CD it CD U) C) U) U)U)

C C) Di C) Di it C) hi

0

C) C) it it •• hi H- C) it it U) HC

CD CD C) C) HC C) C) C) U)

C • r C ci it C)

C C)

0

0 CD cC U) N)

L U) C) cC

H C) CI Di

0 Di HH C) it C) Hhi H- hi

C ci U)

0 it

0

0

0 C)

C

C C) C)

C C)

C) C) CD • CD

C

— hi CD) HCD Di it -• it hi

N Di C) it it

C

C it CD C) ci

C Di

0 it ci

Di HC Di H- H- ci

C

C U)

0

I)

0 C)

C ci

C H- CD C) CC it

C

HC Di C) ci C) ci

0 U) Ni

ci

C

C it it

C

C U) it U)

O it Di C) Di H- CIit it HC it Di it C)

O it ci it ci it CD it C) U) C)

hi H- C) CD C) it CD

0 CD

• 0 Di hi

C C)

0 C)

CD it Di • U)

C CD

Cc) it H- it U) it

Di Di ci it • Di

0

hi DI C) CD it U) Hhi C) hi C) hi CD ci ci

C)

0 CD ci C) CD

Di <1 hi

C H- CD Di

C) C) C)

C

CD C) C)

Case 2:11-cr-00132-DRD Document 45 Filed 09/24/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 211
OX

00HZFt•

Di

00

Ft

(1)0ItODiHIFtZ(DC!)0)0

z

(1)(DO

0H0030 (110(11H-

<

0)0

FtFt

00H0

0

Ft0C!03

0

(D

0) Ft0 030 Di

(1 HFt

H

0 (1

C! (C03 (1)(D 030

0

(1) (1Ft (0Dl (DC!

O Ft

(1)

0

11 Ft

H- FtFt Di

Ft

0

03

0

Di Cl

Ft

H- Ft

(Ci

(I) Ft

(1 0

Di Di0 (1)

Di

03

0

H Ft

Di

0

0

H

0Di

0

0

0

Di

0 03

Di

0

0

0

Di Ft03DiFj 03

H

Ft

0

FtH

(1) Di

11) 03

Ft

0

HI

H • FtFt

Ft

Di

0C)0H03DiFt0

H

Di0)Ci

C)

C)(IH

LII

N)F!)FtHi(1)Ft

Ft

03

ClHFtHDiC!)

(1)FtClFtFt(I)C)03HFt

Case 2:11-cr-00132-DRD Document 45 Filed 09/24/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 212
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Amendment to the Annual Reporton Form 10-K/A of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) for the periodended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Richard N.Nottenburg, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

(1)           theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  April 27, 2010 |                                     |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                       | /s/ Richard N.  Nottenburg               |
|                       | Richard N.  Nottenburg                   |
| * *                   | *President  and Chief Executive Officer* |
| * *                   | *(Principal  Executive Officer)*         |

 

1

----
#### Roberta Heiden, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

[853 NYS2d 655]

The defendants made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the table wheel upon which the plaintiff tripped and fell was open and obvious, and not inherently dangerous *(see Mastellone v City of New York,*29 AD3d 540 [2006]; *Swan v Eastman Kodak Co.,*16 AD3d 1098, 1099 [2005]; *Hecht v 281 Scarsdale Corp.,*3 AD3d 551, 552 [2004]; *Cupo v Karfunkel,*1 AD3d 48 [2003]; *Sorce v Great Oak Mar.,*282 AD2d 598, 599 [2001]). In response, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact sufficient to defeat the motion for summary judgment *(see generally Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Thus, the Supreme *694Court erred in denying that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment.

In light of our determination, we need not reach the parties’ remaining contentions. Rivera, J.P., Lifson, Miller, Garni and Eng, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Hassan M. Ahmed, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, of Sonus Networks, Inc., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 ("Annual Report") of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the
"Registrant");

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;

4.     The
Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the Registrant and have:



5.     The
Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors:



|Date: March 15, 2005 |  |                                                                                                                               
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/HASSAN M. AHMEDHassan M. Ahmed Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
(Principal Executive Officer)

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.2



CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, Charles Driscoll, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Viscorp, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



---

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date: November 15, 2006











| | /s/ Charles Driscoll                    
| | ----------------------------------------
| | Charles Driscoll
Chief Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ 

# Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

January 5, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 129564-67 (75)(76) 129569-72 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

JOEANN BATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 129564-67

v

DR. SIDNEY GILBERT, Defendant-Appellee, and COA: 252022, 252047, 252792, and 252793 Wayne CC: 03-308969-NH

D&R OPTICAL CORPORATION, d/b/a HEALTH CENTER OPTICAL, Defendant-Appellant.

___________________ ________________ JOEANN BATES, Plaintiff-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant, SC: 129569-72

v

DR. SIDNEY GILBERT, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee, and COA: 252022, 252047, 252792, and 252793 Wayne CC: 03-308969-NH

D&R OPTICAL CORPORATION, d/b/a HEALTH CENTER OPTICAL, Defendant-Appellee/ Cross-Appellee.

___________________ _________________
On order of the Chief Justice, motions by defenda nts-appelant for extension of the time for filing their supplemental brie fs are considered and they are GRANTED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 5, 2007

Clerk