alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 8

Case 2:11-cv-01210-JMV-SCM Document 469-11 Filed 06/21/19 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 19915
Curriculum Vitae | Grant W. McGuire

www.msbnj.com/attorneys/grant-w-mcguire/ 1/1

Grant W. McGuire, Partner

© 2012 McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC. Attorney Advertising. Website by Great Jakes. Client Login Admin Privacy Policy Terms of Use

About Us Attorneys Practice Areas Diversity Contact Blogs

Grant W. McGuire

973-622-4868

gmcguire@msbnj.com

Grant W. McGuire is a partner of McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC. Grant is a seasoned litigator who has

successfully tried cases to conclusion in New Jersey’s Federal and State Courts. Over his twenty-plus years of

experience Grant has represented clients with respect to a broad range of issues, including, but not limited to,

professional liability defense, employment matters, products liability, insurance coverage issues and premises

liability. While an experienced trial lawyer, Grant is also well versed in alternative dispute resolution, having

participated in numerous mediations and arbitrations. Grant’s diverse practice has led to experience that make him

an asset to clients. His insights have also made Grant a popular choice as local counsel for out of state firms with

cases pending in New Jersey.

Before joining McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC, Grant worked with a mid-sized firm in Newark and Roseland,

New Jersey as an associate (from 1999-2001) and as a partner from (2001-2019). Prior to entering private practice

Grant worked as an Assistant Prosecutor in the Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office from 1996-1999. Upon

graduating from Seton Hall Law Grant served as a law clerk to the Hon. Alfred J. Lechner, Jr., United States District

Court (D.N.J.).

While always a zealous advocate for his clients, Grant is ever cognizant of the value of civility in litigation.

Grant was appointed and certified as a civil arbitrator for the United States District Court for the District of New

Jersey in 2003 and continues to serve in said capacity to the present.

Education

Seton Hall University School of Law, J.D.

Georgetown University, B.A.

Practice Areas

Litigation

Bar Admissions

New Jersey

United States District Court, District of New Jersey

United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals

United States Supreme Court

Memberships

Board of Directors for the Historical Society of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey

American Bar Association

Association of the Federal Bar of New Jersey

New Jersey State Bar Association

Morris County Bar Association

Defense Research Institute

Association of Defense Trial Attorneys

Fellow of the American Bar Foundation in 2015

Honors

Honored with an AV rating by Martindale-Hubbell since 2012

SHARE THIS PAGE:

Case 2:11-cv-01210-JMV-SCM Document 469-11 Filed 06/21/19 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 19916
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Airspan Networks, Inc. (the
      “Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Aronstam,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March
                31, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Peter
              AronstamPeter
              AronstamChief
                Financial Officer
Case 3:11-cr-00161-JAP Document 68 Filed 11/30/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 528
Case 3:11-cr-00161-JAP Document 68 Filed 11/30/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 529
Case 3:11-cr-00161-JAP Document 68 Filed 11/30/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 530
ORDER

PETER K. LAGANA,

Respondent.

Petitioner Carmelo Herrera has presented ror filing a

Petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254

and an Application to proceed forma pauperis pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(a) (1).

In support of his Application to Proceed in forma pauperis,

Petitioner has submitted an unsigned certification from the

Business Office of Northern State Prison, which reflects a

balance of $450.25.

IT APPEARING THAT:

Local civil Rule 81.2 prohibits this court from granting in

forma pauperis status to any petitioner whose prison account

exceeds $200;

i cr I dry of 0

, 2001,

pauperis is hereby DENIED; and it is further
U)

rtC)

a,,

it

(DC)

Cl) ci

CD

ou,

HH

itF)

F) H

C)

rt

Cl Ca

C)

CD

1’)
1677243.1 

SZAFERMAN, LAKIND, 

 BLUMSTEIN & BLADER, P.C. 

101 Grovers Mill Road, Suite 200 

Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648 

Telephone: (609) 275-0400 

Fax: (609) 275-4511 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

 

JENNIFER KASILAG, et al., 

 

 Plaintiffs, 

 

v. 

 

HARTFORD INVESTMENT 

FINANCIALSERVICES, LLC, 

 

 Defendant. 

 

Document Electronically Filed 

Civil No. 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW 

 

JENNIFER KASILAG, et al., 

 

 Plaintiffs, 

 

v. 

 

HARTFORD FUNDS 

MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC, 

 

 Defendant. 

 

Civil No. 1:14-cv-01611-RMB-KMW 

PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF 

MOTION FOR PARTIAL 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Return Date: To be assigned by Court

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED 

TO: ALL COUNSEL 

Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW Document 144 Filed 06/05/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 3815
1677243.1 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on a date to be determined by the Court, the 

Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned counsel, shall move before the Hon. 

Renée Marie Bumb, U.S.D.J., at the Mitchell H. Cohen United States Court House, 

4th and Cooper Streets, Room 1050, Camden, New Jersey 08101, for an Order 

granting Partial Summary Judgment in favor of Plaintiffs: (1) on behalf of the 

Hartford Capital Appreciation Fund (“Cap App Fund”), for a ruling that the 

compensation Defendants, Hartford Investment Financial Services, LLC and 

Hartford Funds Management Company, LLC, received and retained in investment 

management fees from the Cap App Fund between 2011 through 2013 constitutes 

a breach of Defendants’ fiduciary duty under § 36(b) of the Investment Company 

Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. § 80a-35(b); and (2) on behalf of the Hartford Healthcare 

Fund (f/k/a Hartford Global Health Fund), the Hartford Conservative Allocation 

Fund, the Hartford Growth Opportunities Fund, the Hartford Balanced Fund (f/k/a 

Hartford Advisers Fund), the Hartford Inflation Plus Fund, the Hartford Capital 

Appreciation Fund and the Hartford Floating Rate Fund, for a judgment as a matter 

of law on Defendants’ Second Affirmative Defense. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that in support of this motion the 

Plaintiffs shall rely upon the accompanying Brief in Support of this Motion for 

Partial Summary Judgment, Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute, 

Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW Document 144 Filed 06/05/15 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 3816
1677243.1 

Declaration of Arnold C. Lakind and Declaration of Christopher Kwelty, all of 

which are being filed herewith. 

 SZAFERMAN, LAKIND, 

 BLUMSTEIN & BLADER, P.C. 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 

 s/Arnold Lakind 

 Arnold Lakind 

Dated: June 5, 2015

Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW Document 144 Filed 06/05/15 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 3817
|   | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q      for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 10, 2010 | By:   | /s/ Barry Zyskind                                                                         |
|-------------------------|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |            | Barry      ZyskindPresident      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer) |

----
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Penn Virginia GP Holdings, L.P. (the
“Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, A. James Dearlove, President and Chief Executive Officer of PVG GP, LLC, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





Date:   November
      5, 2009/s/ A. James DearloveA. James DearlovePresident
      and Chief Executive Officer





This
written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
as an exhibit to the Report.  A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will
be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

DANIEL TRIPO 

Plaintiff(s) 

vs. 

ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL 

CENTER, SYLVIANA BARSOUM, 

M.D., RENU CHHOKRA, M.D., and 

ARLEEN LAMBA, M.D. 

Defendant(s) 

Civil Action Number 

3:11-CV-02050-MAS-DEA 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the 

undersigned, the attorneys of record for the parties to the 

above entitled action, that the above action of plaintiff, 

DANIEL TRIPO, against defendant, ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON UNIVERSITY 

HOSPITAL s/h/a ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL CENTER, and the same 

hereby is dismissed, with prejudice, and without costs to any 

party as against the other. This stipulation may be filed 

without further notice with the Clerk of the Court. 

Dated: August 6, 2013 

Amabile & Erman, P.C. 

By: Anthony A. Lenza, Jr., Esq. 

1000 South Avenue 

Staten Island, NY 10314 

~~s~~' Kelly & Strollo, P.A. 

~ Lauren M. Strollo, Esq. 

244 Morris Avenue, Suite 304 

Union, NJ 07083 

Case 3:11-cv-02050-MAS-DEA Document 53 Filed 10/03/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 689
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00607-CV

IN RE Ronald Dale BENNETT

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 31, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On August 19, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has 

considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010-CI-01359, styled Robert C. Hasslocher and Julie Himoff v. Williams 

Brothers Construction Co., Inc., et al., pending in the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the 

Honorable Solomon J. Casseb, III presiding. However, the Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, presiding judge 

of the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, presided over the hearing that resulted in the order 

complained of, and the Honorable John D. Gabriel, presiding judge of the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar 

County, Texas, signed the order complained of.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Alland Zamor, Respondent.

[822 NYS2d 606]

Appeal by the People from a sentence of the County Court, Rockland County (Resnik, J.), imposed March 22, 2005, upon the defendant’s conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and upon his adjudication as a second felony offender, the sentence being a determinate term of four years’ imprisonment, to be followed by a two-year period of post-release supervision.

Ordered that the sentence is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Rockland County, for resentencing in accordance herewith.

*828On January 5, 2005 the defendant entered a plea of guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, based upon conduct which occurred on August 25, 2004. In exchange for the defendant’s plea of guilty, it was agreed that the defendant would receive an indeterminate sentence of 4x/2 to 9 years’ imprisonment. On March 22, 2005 the County Court sentenced the defendant pursuant to the provisions of the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738; hereinafter the DLRA), as a second felony offender, to a determinate term of four years’ imprisonment, to be followed by a two-year period of post-release supervision.

The DLRA established a new sentencing structure for drug offenses. In particular, it added to the Penal Law §§ 60.04, 70.70, and 70.71, which set forth the authorized sentences for persons convicted of offenses defined in Penal Law § 220.00 as controlled substances offenses or offenses involving marijuana. As is relevant here, the new DLRA provisions were to become effective on January 13, 2005, and were applicable to crimes committed on or after that date (L 2004, ch 738, § 41 [d-1]).

The defendant was sentenced on March 22, 2005 for an offense that he committed on August 25, 2004. The DLRA, while ameliorative in nature, expressly stated that the new sentencing structure “shall apply to crimes committed on or after the effective date” of the relevant sections of the statute, the effective date being January 13, 2005 (L 2004, ch 738, § 41 [d-1]). Thus, the DLRA’s sentencing provisions are to have prospective application (see *People v Utsey,*7 NY3d 398 [2006]). The exceptions for defendants convicted of class A-I (L 2004, ch 738, § 23) and A-II (L 2005, ch 643) felonies are not relevant here (see *People v Aviles,*29 AD3d 813 [2006]; *People v Mann,*28 AD3d 791, 792 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 759 [2006]; *People v DeCastro,*27 AD3d 762 [2006]; *People v Goode,*25 AD3d 723 [2006]).

As the defendant’s crime was committed prior to the effective date of the DLRA sentencing provisions, the sentence imposed pursuant to the DLRA was invalid as a matter of law, and the defendant must be resentenced pursuant to the law applicable at the time he committed the offense for which he was convicted *(see People v Castro,*28 AD3d 674 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 786 [2006]). Miller, J.P, Ritter, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raymond Rodriguez, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 762]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Efrain Alvarado, J., at plea; John Collins, J., at sentence), rendered on or about October 14, 2004, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge *423or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur—Tom, J.E, Marlow, Sullivan, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P (the
“Partnership”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Halbert S. Washburn, Co-Chief Executive Officer of BreitBurn GP, LLC, the
general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.





/s/ Halbert S. WashburnHalbert
      S. WashburnCo-Chief
      Executive Officer of BreitBurn GP, LLCDated:  March
      17, 2010
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gulf & Orient Steamship Company, Ltd. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), we, Michael Vardakis, President, and Melissa Ladakis, Secretary and Treasurer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Date:November 10, 2008By:/s/Michael VardakisMichael Vardakis, President and Director  Date:November 10, 2008By:/s/Melissa LadakisMelissa Ladakis, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
        OF**
 **CHIEF
        EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **AND
        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 
 In
        connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q for the quarter
        ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) of ZipGlobal Holdings, Inc., a Delaware
        corporation (the “Company”), I, Michael C. Lee, the President of the Company
        hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
        and
        belief, that:
 
 1.
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
        November 12, 2008
 
 By:
              /s/
                  MICHAEL C. LEEMichael
                  C. LeePresident
                  and Director(Principal
                  Executive Officer)(Principal
                  Financial/Accounting Officer)
1 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov

What’s New With the CE Online Diary?

Brandon Kopp

Office of Survey Methods Research

2016 CE Survey Methods Symposium

July 12, 2016
2 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov

2016

2011

2014

2012

2013

2015

2017

2018

Mobile

Desktop

Timeline

Desktop Diary Testing

Gemini Proof of Concept Test

Desktop Diary Feasibility Test

Individual Diaries 

Feasibility Test

Large Scale Feasibility Test

Online Diary Improvement Project

Desktop & Mobile Diary

Usability Testing

Mobile Diary (Phase I)

Mobile Diary (Phase II)

Electronic Desktop Diary Designs

Usability Test

Feasibility Test
The Online Diary

Desktop Mobile
Room for Improvement
5 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov

Data Entry Challenges

 These issues surfaced in both usability tests and feasibility tests

 Expenses were often aggregated when written in the diary

e.g., “Groceries” instead of “milk”, “bread”, “cheese”

 Respondents in the feasibility tests tend to enter fewer expenses 

than a matched sample from the paper survey

Test

Median Entries 

(Online)

Median Entries 

(Paper)

Web Diary Feasibility 61 69

Individual Diaries Feasibility 51 72
6 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov

Navigation/Login Challenges

 Participants in usability tests had trouble navigating to the website

 The url was: http://respond.census.gov/poc

 Participants searched for the link in Google or used autocomplete which led them 

to other Census surveys

 Respondents in feasibility tests were given a written URL. Not an email or 

text message that they could click

 Logins during feasibility tests have been low and sporadic, but we don’t 

have a solid benchmark to compare against

 We (or I) believe that the complexity of usernames and passwords and 

navigation has something to do with this
Respondent Training Challenges

 We now need materials that 

cover desktop and mobile 

versions

 We have struggled to develop 

respondent training materials 

that are engaging and 

informative

 We are also working on various 

ways of integrating this 

information into the 

instrument
8 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov

Training Challenges
9 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov

Protocol Challenges

 One major benefit of an online instrument is paradata

monitoring

 In feasibility tests, Field Representatives have been asked to call 

respondents who have not logged into the diary to prompt them 

to respond. Compliance has been low.

 It is also unclear how much prompting is too much, what are the 

best modes to contact the respondent, etc.
10 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov

Some Questions for Discussion

 How do we increase respondent engagement with the Online 

Diary?

 What can we do to improve the quality of the data entered?

 How can we maximize the usefulness of the paradata collected 

in the Online Diary?

 How many reminders is too many?
Contact Information

11 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov

Brandon Kopp

Research Psychologist

Office of Survey Methods Research

www.bls.gov/osmr

202-691-7514

kopp.brandon@bls.gov
EXHIBIT NO. 23

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated November 8, 2001, included in this Form 10-K of NUI Corporation for the year ended September 30, 2001, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements File No. 33-56509 relating to Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 Registration Statement, File No. 33-51459 relating to NUI Direct, File No. 33-57183 relating to the Savings and Investment Plan, File No. 33-24169 relating to the 1988 Stock Plan, File No. 333-02425 relating to the 1996 Stock Option and Stock Award Plan, File No. 333-02421 relating to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, File No. 333-02423 relating to the 1996 Director Stock Purchase Plan,  File No. 333-92817 relating to Form S-3 Registration Statement and File No. 333-46036 relating to the Virginia Gas Company Registration Statement. 

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

New York, New YorkDecember 21, 2001