alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

DEBORAH HEART AND LUNG CENTER,

Plaintiff,

v.

PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF 

THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA 

HEALTH SYSTEM d/b/a PENN 

PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER, 

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA 

HEALTH SYSTEM, PENN CARDIAC CARE 

AT CHERRY HILL, CLINICAL HEALTH 

CARE ASSOCIATES OF NEW JERSEY, 

P.C., VIRTUA HEALTH, INC., VIRTUA 

MEMORIAL HOSPITAL BURLINGTON 

COUNTY, THE CARDIOLOGY GROUP, 

P.A., and JOHN DOES 1-10,

Defendants.

 Civil Action No. 1:11-CV-01290-RMB-KMW

Document Electronically Filed

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO

THE PENN DEFENDANTS ONLY

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Deborah Heart and 

Lung Center (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Presbyterian Medical Center of the University of 

Pennsylvania Health System d/b/a Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, University of

Pennsylvania Health System, Penn Cardiac Care at Cherry Hill, and Clinical Health Care 

Associates of New Jersey, P.C. (collectively, the “Penn Defendants”) by and through their 

respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree that the above-captioned case is hereby 

unconditionally DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and on the merits AS TO THE PENN 

DEFENDANTS ONLY, without fees or costs to any party.

STIPULATED, AGREED AND CONSENTED TO BY:

Case 1:11-cv-01290-RMB-KMW Document 139 Filed 06/07/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 3173
/s/ Anthony Argiropoulos /s/ R. Brendan Fee

Anthony Argiropoulos

SILLS CUMMIS & GROSS P.C.

650 College Road East

Princeton, NJ 08540

Direct: 609-227-4690

aargiropoulos@sillscummis.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Deborah Heart and Lung Center

Dated June 7, 2013

R. Brendan Fee

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

1701 Market Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Direct: 215-963-5136

bfee@morganlewis.com

Attorneys for the Penn Defendants

Presbyterian Medical Center of the University 

of Pennsylvania Health System d/b/a Penn 

Presbyterian Medical Center, University 

of Pennsylvania Health System, Penn Cardiac 

Care at Cherry Hill, and Clinical Health Care 

Associates of New Jersey, P.C.

Dated: June 7, 2013

Case 1:11-cv-01290-RMB-KMW Document 139 Filed 06/07/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 3174
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Hon. Katherine S. Hayden 

v. : Criminal No. 011-165

VINCENZO GENOVESE : O R D E R

This matter having been opened to the Court, on the joint

application of the United States Attorney for the District of New

Jersey (Leslie Faye Schwartz, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing)

and defendant Vincenzo Genovese (Hoffman & Pollok LLP, Susan C.

Wolfe, Esq., appearing), to deposit a restitution check in the

amount of $43,607, into the District of New Jersey Court

Registry, prior to sentencing in the above-captioned matter, and

good cause having been shown,

IT IS, therefore, on this 5 day of July 2012, ORDERED that th

the Clerk’s Office of the District of New Jersey deposit the

$43,607 into the Court Registry, to be held there until further

order of the Court. 

 /s/ Katharine S. Hayden 

 KATHARINE S. HAYDEN

 United States District Judge
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  filing  of  GSI  Technologies  USA  Inc.,  a Delaware
corporation  (the  "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the period ended October 31st,
2003,  as  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  Gilles  Addison,  President,  CEO  and  Acting CFO of the Company,
hereby  certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C.ss.1350),  that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 3, 2004




By: /s/ Gilles Addison
___________________________
Gilles Addison
Acting CFO



<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Xinhua WU, certify that:

     1. I have  reviewed  this annual  report on Form  10-KSB/A  ofChina  Pharma
Holdings, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a  material  fact or omit to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's  other certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a. Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation and

         c.  Disclosed  in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to
the registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a. All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b. Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 8, 2006


 /s/ Xinhua WU
-----------------------
Xinhua WU
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1330 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1330

To amend the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 to clarify whistleblower 
            rights and protections, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 6, 2019

 Ms. Duckworth introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 to clarify whistleblower 
            rights and protections, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Department of Energy and Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission Whistleblower Protection Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF PERSON.

    Section 211(a)(2) of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 (42 
U.S.C. 5851(a)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (G) as 
        clauses (i) through (vii), respectively, and indenting the 
        clauses appropriately;
            (2) in the matter preceding clause (i) (as so 
        redesignated), by striking the paragraph designation and all 
        that follows through ``includes--'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(2) Definitions.--In this section:
                    ``(A) Employer.--The term `employer' includes--''; 
                and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Person.--The term `person' includes--
                            ``(i) a person (as defined in section 11 of 
                        the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 
                        2014));
                            ``(ii) the Commission; and
                            ``(iii) the Department of Energy.''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 68 Filed 07/01/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 558
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Globalink, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2008 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Robin Young
                                 ----------------------
                                 Robin Young
                                 Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2008

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Globalink, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2008 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Ben Choi
                                 ----------------------
                                 Ben Choi
                                 Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5036 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5036

To extend the patent numbered RE 38,014 (BIEBERSTEIN) for a period of 2 
                                 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 8, 2004

   Mr. Baca introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the patent numbered RE 38,014 (BIEBERSTEIN) for a period of 2 
                                 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PATENT.

    The Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and 
Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office shall, when 
patent numbered RE 38,014 (BIEBERSTEIN) (relating to the Maglite 
flashlight) expires, extend such patent for 2 years, with all the 
rights pertaining to such patent.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
     PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lawrence Chimerine, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Quarterly Report of Dentalserv.com on Form 10-QSB, for the
quarter ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Dentalserv.com

                            /s/  Lawrence Chimerine
                            --------------------------------------
                            Lawrence Chimerine
                            President and Chief Executive Officer
                            Dentalserv.com

                            August 10, 2007
#### In the Matter of Robert L. Marandino, Appellant, v Westchester Country Club, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[822 NYS2d 762]

In a proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Westchester Country Club, Inc., which, after a hearing, terminated the petitioner’s membership therein, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Smith, J), entered February 16, 2005, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

An association may expel a member for a violation of its established rules for which expulsion is provided *(see Matter of Purpura v Richmond County Country Club,*114 AD2d 460, 461 [1985]). Moreover, “ ‘where the constitution and by-laws of a voluntary association reasonably set forth grounds for expulsion *801and provide for a hearing upon notice to the member, judicial review of such proceedings is unavailable, unless the reason for expulsion is not a violation of the constitution or by-laws or is so trivial as to suggest that the action of the association was capricious or corrupt, or unless the association failed to administer its own rules fairly’ ” *(Caposella v Pinto,*265 AD2d 362, 363 [1999], quoting *Bloch v Veteran Corps, of Artillery, State of N.Y.,*61 AD2d 772, 773 [1978]).

The petitioner’s conduct in repeatedly violating the conditions of his nonresident membership status and misrepresenting his residency provided a sufficient basis for the Board of Governors (hereafter the board) to expel him. The board’s determination that the petitioner’s conduct was not trivial, but “improper” and “prejudicial to the interest of the Club” was not arbitrary and capricious.

Moreover, the petitioner’s mere allegation of bias on the part of the board will not suffice. “There must be a factual demonstration to support the allegation of bias and proof that the outcome flowed from it” *(Matter of Warder v Board of Regents of Univ. of State of N.Y.,*53 NY2d 186, 197 [1981], *cert denied*454 US 1125 [1981]; *see Caposella v Pinto, supra).*

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Miller, J.E, Goldstein, Mastro and Dillon, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

District of New Jersey

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR.

FEDERAL BUILDING & U.S. COURTHOUSE

50 WALNUT ST., ROOM 5054

P.O. Box 999

Newark, NJ 07101-0999

973-645-6042

June, 2012

Andrew Cox Jane Yoon

ECCF J201 107038 Office of the U.S. Attorney

354 Doremus Avenue District ofNew Jersey

Newark, NJ 07105 970 Broad Street, Suite 700

Newark, NJ 07102

Michael N. Pedicini

60 Washington Street

Morristown, NJ 07960

LETTER ORDER

Re: United States v. Cox

Criminal No.: 11-99

Dear Messrs. Cox and Counsel:

The Court has received Defendant Andrew Cox (“Defendant”)’ s request for an extension

to file his response to the Government’s opposition to his pending motion to withdraw his guilty

plea from June 19, 2012 to June 28, 2012. The Government has consented to Defendant’s

request for an extension.

IT IS accordingly on this2 day ofJune, 2012,

ORDERED that Defendant may submit his reply to the Government’s opposition to his

motion to withdraw his guilty plea no later than June 28, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CHAMBERS OF

JOSE L. LINARES

JUDGE

L. Linares

United States District Judge

Case 2:11-cr-00099-CCC Document 118 Filed 06/21/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1298
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Snowdon Resources Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert M. Baker, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated this 20th day of September 2010.




“R.M. Baker”__________________________________


Robert M. Baker


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

OF FLORIDA 

SECOND DISTRICT 

WILLIAM JOHN VANDORNICK, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D15-1254 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. )

___________________________________) 

Opinion filed October 9, 2015. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Charlotte County; George C. Richards, 

Judge. 

William John Vandornick, pro se. 

MORRIS, Judge. 

 We affirm the order dismissing William John Vandornick's motion filed 

under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 without prejudice to his timely refiling 

his motion now that the direct appeal of his judgment and sentence has concluded. See 

Daniels v. State, 712 So. 2d 765, 765 (Fla. 1998) (holding that during the pendency of a 

direct appeal, a trial court is without jurisdiction to rule on a postconviction motion). 

SILBERMAN and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CHARNJIT SINGH,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 2:11-cv-01619

v.

AMERICAN CORADIUS INTERNATIONAL, LLC,

Defendant.

/

NOTICE OF PENDING SETTLEMENT

Defendant, American Coradius International, LLC, by and through its undersigned

counsel, hereby submits this Notice of Pending Settlement and states that the parties have

reached a verbal settlement with regard to this case and are presently drafting, finalizing,

and executing the settlement and dismissal documents. Upon execution of the same, the

parties will file the appropriate dismissal documents with the Court.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Aaron R. Easley

Aaron R. Easley, Esq.

SESSIONS, FISHMAN, NATHAN & ISRAEL, L.L.C.

200 Route 31 North, Suite 203

Flemington, NJ 08822-5736

Telephone: (908) 751-5797

Facsimile: (908) 751-5944

aeasley@sessions-law.biz

Attorneys for Defendant,

American Coradius International, LLC

Case 2:11-cv-01619-SRC-MAS Document 3 Filed 04/29/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 15
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on this 29th day of April 2011, a copy of the foregoing was filed

electronically in the ECF system. Notice of this filing will be sent to the parties of record

by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system, including Plaintiff’s counsel as

described below. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system.

Andrew I. Glenn, Esq.

Card & Glenn, P. A.

2501 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 100

Hollywood, FL 33020

/s/ Aaron R. Easley

Aaron R. Easley, Esq.

SESSIONS, FISHMAN, NATHAN & ISRAEL, L.L.C.

200 Route 31 North, Suite 203

Flemington, NJ 08822-5736

Telephone: (908) 751-5797

Facsimile: (908) 751-5944

aeasley@sessions-law.biz

Attorneys for Defendant,

American Coradius International, LLC

Case 2:11-cv-01619-SRC-MAS Document 3 Filed 04/29/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 16
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40158

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ARTURO REYES-GOMEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. 5:05-CR-1694-ALL

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Arturo Reyes-Gomez appeals his guilty-plea conviction of and sentence for

violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 by being found in the United States without permission

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 3, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-40158

2

following removal. He challenges the decision to enhance his offense level 16

levels pursuantto U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) based on a determination that his

1994 Texas conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon is a crime of

violence. He contends that the offense, as set forth in TEXAS PENAL CODE

§§ 22.01(a)(2) and 22.02(a), is not among those enumerated in § 2L1.2, comment.

(n.1(B)(iii)), and does not have “as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force againstthe person of another.” The Texas aggravatedassault statute, § 22.02, is substantially similar to the definition of “aggravated

assault”found in the Model Penal Code and thus qualifies as the enumerated offense of“aggravated assault” under the guidelines. See United States v. GuillenAlvarez, 489 F.3d 197, 199-201 (5th Cir. 2007).

In light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), Reyes-Gomez challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense

that must be found by a jury. This court has held that that issue is “fully foreclosed from further debate.” United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624,

625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). 

The judgment is AFFIRMED.