T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T P AB L O P . P INA , P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. C . S C A V E T T A , A s s o c ia te W a r d e n ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 16749 D . C. N o . 3 : 0 7 - c v - 0 4 9 8 9 - SI ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S us a n I l l s t on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry17, 2012 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , T A L L M A N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P abl o P . P i na, a C al i forni a s t at e pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng c l a i m s a r i s i ng f r o m h is in d e te rm in a te c o n f in e m e n t in th e S e c u r ityH o u s in g U n it ( “S H U ” ) . W e



# FI LED JAN 25 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 16749 2 h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . W y at t v . T e rhune , 31 5 F . 3d 11 08 , 11 17 (9th C i r. 20 03 ) ( fa i l ure t o exh austadm i ni stra t i ve re m edi es ); B arr e n v . H

arr i ngton , 15 2 F . 3d 11 93 , 11 94 (9th C i r. 19 98 ) ( order) (di sm i ss al unde r28 U . S . C . § 1915A ) . W e m a ya f f i rm on a nyba s i s s upport e d bythe r e c or d, T hom ps on v . P aul , 5 4 7 F. 3 d1 0 5 5 , 1 0 5 8 - 5 9 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 8 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d P i na ’ s m a i l - r e l a t e d c l a i m s be c aus e P i na f a ile dto e x h au s t a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s p r io rto f ilin g s u it. Se e W

oodf ord v . N go , 54 8 U . S . 81 , 85 , 93 -95 (20 06 ) ( concl ud i ng that“ prop erexhaust i on ” i s m andat ory a n dr e q u ir e s a d h e r e n c e to a d m in is tr a tiv e p r o c e du r a l ru le s ) ; McKi nn eyv. Carey , 311 F . 3d 1198, 1199 ( 9th C i r . 2002) ( pe rc ur i a m ) ( r e qui r i ng e xhaus t i on of a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s p r io rto f ilin g s u it) ; s e e al

s o R hodes v . R obi ns on , 621 F . 3d 10 02 , 10 06 -07 (9th C i r. 20 10 ) ( the P ri son L i t i gat i on R ef orm A ctal l ow s f

or an a m e n d e dc o m p la in t to a lle g e n e w a n dn e w lye x h au s te dc la im s a d d r e s s in g in c id e n ts thathad n otye ttranspi re d atthe ori gi nal t i m e of f i l i ng ). D i s m i s s a l of

P i na ’ s due pr oc e s s c l a i m w a s pr ope rbe c aus e , e ve n a s s um i ng tha tthe r e w a s al i be rtyi nt e r e s ta ts t a ke i n a voi di ng c ont i nue d c onf i ne m e nti n the S H U , P in af

a ile dto a lle g e f

a c ts s h o w in g th a t h e w a s d e n ie ddu e p r o c e s s . See B ru ce v. Y

l st , 351 F . 3d 1283, 1287 ( 9th C i r . 2003) ( pr i s on ga ng va l i da t i on deci si on s nee d o nl y be s up po rt ed by “ som e e vi dence, ” and pri son o ff i ci al s nee d10- 16749 3 on l y provi de the i nm at e w i th som e not i ce of the charges agai nsthi m and an o p p o rtu n i tyt o p r e s e n th i s v i e w s ) ; Ca l . Co d e Re g s . t i t . 1 5 , § 3 3 7 8 ( c ) ( 6 ) ( C) ( pr ovi di ng f

orthe us e of

a“ C onf i de nt i a l I nf

orm a t i on D i s c l os ur e F orm ” f or di s c l os ur e t o the i nm a t e of i nf orm a t i on us e d i n the va l i da t i on ori na c t i ve s t a tus r e v ie w ) . D i s m i s s a l of

P i na ’ s E i ghth A m e ndm e ntc l a i m r e ga r di ng c ondi t i ons i n the S H U w a s pr ope rbe c aus e “ a dm i ni s tr a t i ve s e gr e ga t i on . . . i s w i thi n the t e rm s of confi nem entordi nari l y c on t em pl at ed by a s ent ence . ” A n derso n v. C o u n t y o f Kern , 45 F . 3d 1310, 1316 ( 9th C i r . 1995) ( c ondi t i ons a s s oc i a t e d w i th a dm i ni s tr a t i ve s e gr e ga t i on, s uc h a s c onf i ne m e nti n ac e l l f

orm os tof

the da y , di d notvi ol a t e the E ig h th A m e n d m e n t) . W e do n otconsi der m att er s notspec i fi ca l l y and di st i nct l y r ai se d and ar gu ed in th e o p e n in g b r ie f

. Se e P adge t t

v . W r i ght , 587 F . 3d 983, 985 n. 2 ( 9th C i r . 2009) (percuri am ). P in a ’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s a r e u n p e r s u a s iv e . We g r a n tP i n a ’ s p e n d i n g m o t i o n t o f i l e as u b s t i tu t e R e p l yB r i e f , a n dwe i ns truc tthe c l e rk t o f

i l e the R e pl yB r i e f

r e c e i ve d on S e pt e m be r29, 2011. AF F I RME D.