alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:11-cr-00165-KSH Document 40 Filed 05/31/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 105
Exhibit 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Board of Directors

Velocity Asset Management, Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of Velocity Asset Management, Inc. of our report dated July 15, 2005
related to the consolidated balance sheets of Velocity Asset Management, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, which report is included in
the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 3, of Velocity
Asset Management, Inc.



/s/ Cowan and Gunteski & Co., P.A.

Toms River, New Jersey
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 

 :

ANTOINE EXINVIL, :

 :

Petitioner, :

 :

v. :

 :

U.S.A., et al., :

 :

Respondents. :

 :

Civil No. 11-1444 (RBK)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

IT APPEARING THAT:

1. Petitioner, Antoine Exinvil, a federal inmate currently

confined at the FCI Fort Dix in Fort Dix, New Jersey, seeks to

re-open his case, a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, which was administratively terminated by

Order of this Court entered on March 17, 2011, because Petitioner

had neither prepaid the $5.00 filing fee for a habeas petition as

required by Local Civil Rule 54.3(a), nor had he submitted a

complete application to proceed in forma pauperis. (See Docket

entry no. 4). 

2. On or about March 29, 2011, Petitioner filed a letter

that stated he was enclosing his application to proceed in forma

pauperis (“IFP”), and asking the Court to re-open his habeas

1

Case 1:11-cv-01444-RBK Document 10 Filed 06/11/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 25
action. (See Docket entry no. 5). However, no IFP application

was enclosed.

3. Petitioner again wrote to the Court on November 28,

2011, December 27, 2011, January 27, 2012, and March 12, 2012,

asking that his case be re-opened, but he failed to submit a

completed IFP application or pay the $5.00 filing fee. (See

Docket entry nos. 6, 7, 8, and 9). 

THEREFORE, it is on this 7th day of June , 2012;

ORDERED that Petitioner’s application to re-open his case is

hereby DENIED, without prejudice; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall supply to

Petitioner a blank form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

in a Habeas Corpus Case, for use by a prisoner; and it is further

ORDERED that, if Petitioner wishes to reopen this action, he

shall so notify the Court within 30 days of the date of entry of

this Order, in writing addressed to the Clerk of the Court,

Mitchell H. Cohen Building and U.S. Courthouse, Fourth and Cooper

Streets, Camden, New Jersey, 08101; Petitioner’s writing shall

include either: (1) a complete in forma pauperis application,

including a certification of Petitioner’s institutional account,

as required by Local Civil Rule 81.2(b); or (2) the $5 filing

fee; and it is finally

ORDERED that upon receipt of a writing from Petitioner

stating that he wishes to reopen this case, and either a complete

2

Case 1:11-cv-01444-RBK Document 10 Filed 06/11/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 26
in forma pauperis application or filing fee within the time

allotted by this Court, the Clerk of the Court will be directed

to reopen this case; and it is finally

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of

this Order upon Plaintiff by regular U.S. mail.

s/Robert B. Kugler 

ROBERT B. KUGLER 

United States District Judge

3

Case 1:11-cv-01444-RBK Document 10 Filed 06/11/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 27
#### The Ethel.1 Kimball *v.*The Ethel.

*(Circuit Court, W. D. Texas.*

January, 1887.)

1. Admiralty—Practice—Appeal—Motion to Dismiss.

It is no ground to dismiss an admiralty appeal because the record shows that there was no evidence, nor agreed statement of facts, nor assignment of errors. Admiralty cases on appeal to the circuit court are tried *de nooo,*on the original or amended pleadings, and on such evidence as may be properly offered, whether the same was offered in the district court or not.

*%*Same—Transcript.

An appeal will not be dismissed on account of the transcript not having been properly made up or certified, when the fault thereof is not attributable solely to the appellant.

Admiralty Appeal. On motion to dismiss.

1

 Reported by Joseph P. Hornor, Esq., of the New Orleans bar.

Pardee, J.

This case has been submitted to me by the proctors for the libelant and appellee on a motion to dismiss the appeal and affirm the judgment of the district court, on the grounds that the transcript shows no evidence nor agreed statement of facts nor assignment of errors. That there was no evidence to warrant the judgment of the district court may be the reason underlying the appeal. Admiralty cases, on appeal to the circuit court, are tried *de novo,*on the original or amended pleadings, and on such evidence as may be properly offered, whether the .same was offered in the district court or not. The causes assigned are good, but the transcript is not properly made up and certified, and the appeal might be dismissed for that reason; but as the record of the case shows a general confusion in the minds of all parties, and as I cannot .say the defective transcript is imputable solely to the appellant, I think it will accord more with justice if an order is entered denying the motion to dismiss the appeal, and to direct the appellant to procure and file in the circuit court by the first day of the next term a proper transcript, duly made up and certified according to the fifty-second admiralty rule, as adopted by the supreme court of the United States; otherwise his appeal to stand dismissed.

The clerk will enter such order, and notify proctors.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Baoshinn Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, I, Benny Kan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  August 13, 2009 BAOSHINN CORPORATION By:  /s/ Benny Kan Benny Kan  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Baoshinn Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, I, Sean Webster, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  August 13, 2009 BAOSHINN CORPORATION By:  /s/ Sean Webster Sean Webster
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Imad Kamel Yassine, Chief Financial Officer, of Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the second quarter ended January 31, 2009, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                              

|By:    |                                            | 
|------ | ------------------------------------------ | 
|       |                                            | 
|Name:  | Imad Kamel Yassine                         | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer                    | 
|       | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal | 
|       | Accounting Officer)                        | 
|Date:  | December 15, 2009                          | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Coastal Media Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jon
Suk, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of May, 2007.


/s/ Jon Suk
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
EX-10.35



 Exhibit 10.35 
 Description of 2012 Chaucer Annual Bonus Scheme 
 The 2012 Chaucer Annual
Bonus Scheme (the “2012 Chaucer STIP”) is an annual performance-based bonus program that provides incentive cash compensation opportunities to key officers and employees of Chaucer, including Robert Stuchbery, Chaucer’s
President and CEO. 
 Potential funding under the 2012 Chaucer STIP ranges from 0% to a maximum of 200% of target based on
Chaucer’s 2012 post-tax return on equity (“Chaucer ROE”). Once the overall plan funding level is determined, each participant’s actual payment under the plan is determined based upon the following formula: 50% of the
funding pool is distributed pro rata to participants based upon their individual target awards and the remaining 50% of the funding pool is distributed to participants based upon individual performance. Additionally, under this program each
participant’s total award is paid in two equal tranches: the first to be paid in March 2013 and, provided the participant remains employed by Chaucer through such date, the second tranche is to be paid in January 2014. 

Mr. Stuchbery’s target award under the 2012 Chaucer STIP is equal to 100% of his base salary.
Case 3:11-cr-00061-AET   Document 8   Filed 02/16/11   Page 1 of 3 PageID: 13

Case 3:11-cr-00061-AET   Document 8   Filed 02/16/11   Page 2 of 3 PageID: 14

Case 3:11-cr-00061-AET   Document 8   Filed 02/16/11   Page 3 of 3 PageID: 15
Exhibit 32.2

        CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
                        OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DoMark International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending February 28, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R.
Thomas Kidd, Principle Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: August 28, 2009           By: /s/ R. Thomas Kidd
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    R. Thomas Kidd
                                    Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
                                    Officer, Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 Nos. 333-68935, 333-79995, 333-84819, 333-86805, 333-92815, 333-106090
and 333-112549) of BNP Residential Properties, Inc. of our report dated January
13, 2004, except for Note 11 as to which the date is February 23, 2004, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of BNP Residential
Properties, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2003.






                                             /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP




Raleigh, North Carolina
February 23, 2004



                                       65
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the yearly report of China Pharma
        Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on 10-K for the period
        ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Xinhua Wu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350 as adopted pursuant
        section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
         
        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
         
        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
         
        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Pharma Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by
        China Pharma Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



> Date: March 17,
>                                 2009



> By: /s/ Xinhua Wu
> 
>                                 Xinhua Wu
> 
>                                 Chief Financial Officer
Cardero Resource Corp.: Exhibit 4.12 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com





AMENDING AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDING AGREEMENT is made the 14th day of April,
2011.

BETWEEN:

COALHUNTER MINING CORPORATION, a company incorporated
under the laws of the Province of British Columbia and having its head office at
Suite 507, 475 Howe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 2B3

(“Coalhunter”)

OF THE FIRST PART

AND:

CARBON CREEK PARTNERSHIP, a partnership existing under
the laws of Alberta between P. Burns Carbon Creek Coal Corporation and P. Burns
Partners limited, having an office at Suite 620, 5920 Macleod Trail SW, Calgary,
Alberta, T2H 0K2

(“Carbon Creek Partnership”)

OF THE SECOND PART

WHEREAS Coalhunter and Carbon Creek Partnership entered
into the Carbon Creek Joint Venture Agreement dated June 15, 2010 (the
“Agreement”);

AND WHEREAS the parties wish to amend the Agreement as
set forth herein;

NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH THAT in
consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

	 	1. 	
      All capitalized terms used herein but not defined in this
      Amending Agreement have the meaning ascribed to them in the
    Agreement.

	 	 	 
	 	2. 	
      Section 4.2(b) of the Agreement is deleted and replaced
      with the following:




	 	“(b) 	
      warrants entitling the Carbon Creek Partnership to
      acquire an additional two million (2,000,000) common shares of Coalhunter
      at forty cents ($0.40) per Coalhunter Share exercisable for a period of
      two (2) years from the later of (i) the completion of an initial public
      offering , subdivision, consolidation, capital reorganization,
      reclassification, merger, amalgamation, arrangement, sale,
  dissolution, liquidation or winding-up of Coalhunter or (ii)
November 15, 2010 (the “Coalhunter Warrants”).”








	 	3. 	
      This Amending Agreement shall enure to the benefit of
      Coalhunter and Carbon Creek Partnership and their successors and
      assigns.

	 	 	 
	 	4. 	
      Coalhunter and Carbon Creek Partnership hereby confirm
      that, except as set out in this Amending Agreement, the terms and
      conditions set out in the Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and
      effect.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement as
of the date first written above.

	COALHUNTER MINING 	 	  	 
	CORP. 	 	  	 
	Per 	 	/s/ Michael Hunter 	 
	Name 	 	MICHAEL HUNTER 	 
	Title 	 	PRESIDENT & CEO 	 
	  	 	  	 
	CARBON CREEK 	 	  	 
	PARTNERSHIP, BY ITS 	 	  	 
	MANAGING PARTNER, P. 	 	  	 
	BURNS PARTNERS LIMITED 	 	  	 
	Per 	 	/s/ P. Dean Burns 	 
	Name 	 	P. DEAN BURNS 	 
	Title 	 	DIRECTOR AND SECRETARY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Katharine S. Hayden
~v-
11 Cr. 164 (KSH)
ERIC HAYNBERG,

ORDER
Defendant.

ane nnn ennnnnennnnennennnnnnnnnnnnnnX

Upon the application of Eric Franz, attorney for the above named defendant, it is
hereby,

ORDERED, that Mr. Haynberg is permitted to travel to St. Martin from March
22, 2012 to April 1, 2012 and that Pretrial Services provide Mr. Haynberg with his
passport so that he may do so.

ORDERED, that upon return the defendant shall turn over his passport to Pretrial

Services. All other conditions remain in effect.

Dated: 1/23/12

/s/ Katharine S. Hayden
KATHARINE S. HAYDEN

United States District Judge
Case 2:11-cr-00286-SRC Document 102 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 84
Case 2:11-cr-00286-SRC Document 102 Filed 09/27/11 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 85
Case 2:11-cr-00286-SRC Document 102 Filed 09/27/11 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 86
Case 2:11-cr-00286-SRC Document 102 Filed 09/27/11 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 87
Case 2:11-cr-00286-SRC Document 102 Filed 09/27/11 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 88
Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH Document 27 Filed 12/16/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 148
Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH Document 27 Filed 12/16/11 Page 2 of 8 PageID: 149
Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH Document 27 Filed 12/16/11 Page 3 of 8 PageID: 150
Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH Document 27 Filed 12/16/11 Page 4 of 8 PageID: 151
Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH Document 27 Filed 12/16/11 Page 5 of 8 PageID: 152
Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH Document 27 Filed 12/16/11 Page 6 of 8 PageID: 153
Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH Document 27 Filed 12/16/11 Page 7 of 8 PageID: 154
Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH Document 27 Filed 12/16/11 Page 8 of 8 PageID: 155
#### KRAFT v. R. H. MACY & CO., Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

March 30, 1943.

Skutch & Burton, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Lauterstein, Spiller, Bergerman & Dan-nett, of New York City, for defendant.

GODDARD, District Judge.

It is the general practice of this court to require a nonresident plaintiff to furnish security for costs. Long v. Stites, 6 Cir., 63 F.2d 855, at page 868; Cavicchi v. Mohawk Mfg. Co., Inc., D. C., 27 F.Supp. 981. It does not appear that it would be inequitable in the case at bar to follow the general practice. Motion for security for costs granted.

The allegations in Paragraphs “24” and “25” of the complaint to the effect that the defendants advised plaintiff that plaintiff would be paid $3,000 and be released from all obligations to them if he would return their merchandise and discontinue the sale of it at his stores, which he refused to accept because his damages were greatly in excess of that amount, are in substance allegations of an offer of settlement and rejection which is not material or relevant to the issues presented by the complaint. An offer of settlement is not admissible in evidence. Tennant v. Dudley, 144 N.Y. 504, 39 N.E. 644. The motion to strike Paragraphs “24” and “25” is. granted.

The rule generally followed in this court is that a bill of particulars will not be granted as an aid in preparation for trial. Tully v. Howard et al., D. C., 27 F.Supp. 6, and will be granted only to the extent necessary to enable the moving party to plead. Poole v. White, D. C., *2*F.R.D. 40.

The allegations in the complaint are quite general and indefinite. A bill of particulars should clarify the charges and enable the defendants to properly plead Forstmann et al. v. Wenner-Gren, D.C., 1 F.R.D. 775. This is not an action for conspiracy with many defendants as in the case of Mulloney v. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, D. C., 26 F.Supp. 148, cited by defendants, and it does not appear that defendants require the names of their agents or representatives who acted in the matter to enable them to plead.

Plaintiff’s demand for bill of particulars is granted with respect' to items “A”, “B”, “C”, “E”, “F”, “H”, “I”, “J” of the notice of motion except that plaintiff is not required to state where and what individual-acted in behalf of defendants; also in respect to item “D” except subdivision “2(c)” thereof. But plaintiff is not required to-state where and what individual acted in *55behalf of defendants as demanded in item “D” subdivision “4(a).” The motion respecting items “G” and “K” is denied.

Settle order on notice.
Order filed, January 31, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00077-CV

____________

MKM ENGINEERS, INC., AND PIKA INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant

V.

JAL B. GUZDER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 07-DCV-155803A

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due December 23, 2013. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Karen Woolsey, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM