alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4960 

To prohibit the anticipated extreme reduction in the national marketing 

quotas for the 2005 crop of Flue-cured and Burley tobacco, which, 

if permitted to occur, would mean economic ruin for tobacco farmers 

and their families. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2004 

Mr. JONES of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To prohibit the anticipated extreme reduction in the national 

marketing quotas for the 2005 crop of Flue-cured and 

Burley tobacco, which, if permitted to occur, would mean 

economic ruin for tobacco farmers and their families. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL MARKETING 

4 QUOTA FOR 2005 CROP OF FLUE-CURED AND 

5 BURLEY TOBACCO AT 2004 LEVEL. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for the 

7 2005 crop year, the Secretary of Agriculture shall estab-
2 

•HR 4960 IH 

1 lish and maintain the national marketing quota for Flue2 cured and Burley tobacco at the 2004 level. 

3 SEC. 2. FORFEITURES OF FLUE-CURED AND BURLEY TO4 BACCO. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—This section shall apply notwith6 standing sections 106 through 106B of the Agricultural 

7 Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1445 through 1445–2). 

8 (b) LOAN FORFEITURE.—A producer-owned coopera9 tive marketing association may fully settle, without further 

10 cost to the association, a loan made for the 2005 crop 

11 of Flue-cured and Burley tobacco by forfeiting to the Com12 modity Credit Corporation the Flue-cured or Burley to13 bacco covered by the loan regardless of the condition of 

14 the tobacco. 

15 (c) TREATMENT OF CCC LOSSES.—Any losses to the 

16 Commodity Credit Corporation as a result of the forfeiture 

17 of tobacco under subsection (b)— 

18 (1) shall not be charged to the No Net Cost To19 bacco Account; and 

20 (2) shall not affect the amount of any assess21 ment imposed against Flue-cured or Burley tobacco 

22 under sections 106 through 106B of the Agricultural 

23 Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1445 through 1445–2). 

24 (d) TREATMENT OF FORFEITED TOBACCO.—Tobacco 

25 forfeited under subsection (b) shall not be— 
3 

•HR 4960 IH 

1 (1) counted for the purpose of determining the 

2 Flue-cured or Burley tobacco quota for any year 

3 pursuant to section 319 of the Agricultural Adjust4 ment Act of 1938 (7 U.S.C. 1314e); or 

5 (2) sold for use in the United States, except 

6 that, notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 

7 Commodity Credit Corporation, directly or through 

8 the use of United States leaf dealers, may market 

9 the forfeited tobacco outside the United States. 

Æ
#### Marck *v.*Supreme Lodge Knights of Honor.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

February 14, 1887.)

Benefit Association—Knights of Honor—Expulsion—Death Pending Appeal—Reversal.

A member of a lodge of the Knights of Honor was expelled by his lodge, and appealed to the grand dictator. Pending the appeal he died.' Subsequently the judgment of expulsion was reversed by the grand dictator, he was reinstated by vote of the lodge, and his assessments due up to the time of his death were received. *Held,*following the analogy of the common law and of the law of the order, as held by its supreme dictator, that the appeal did not abate by the death of the member, and his benefit should be paid.

At Law,

*Charles*Steckler, for plaintiff.

*Morris Goodhart,*for defendant.

Shipman, J.

Gisbert W. Marck, a member of German Oak Lodge Knights of Honor, was expelled from the lodge on April 8, 1884, appealed to the grand dictator from said sentence, of which appeal said lodge had notice, and died on April 25,1884, pending said appeal. Subsequently the grand dictator set aside the judgment of expulsion. Marck was reinstated by vote of the lodge, and tbe dues and assessments which were due up to the date of his death were received. No appeal was ever taken from the vote of reinstatement.

If the analogies of the common law are to be regarded, the appeal did not abate by the death of Marck. *Green*v. *Watkins,*6 Wheat. 260. By the reversal of the sentence of expulsion, and by the action of the lodge, he was reinstated as at the date of his expulsion, and was entitled to his benefit. It may be added that such was, at the time, the law of the order, which had held, by its supreme dictator, that if a decision of expulsion was reversed on final appeal, the appellant stands a member as if there had been no such judgment, and he must pay all back dues and .assessments; and if, pending the appeal, he dies, has regularly tendered his dues and assessments, and, after death, the appeal is decided in his favor, his benefit will be paid as one who died in good standing, less the .amount of his tendered and unpaid dues and assessments.

The motion for a new trial is denied.
904 A.2d 720

#### CASINO ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, BALLY’S PARK PLACE, INC. T/A BALLY'S HOTEL CASINO, BALLY’S WILD WEST CASINO AND CLARIDGE CASINO; BOARDWALK REGENCY CORPORATION T/A CAESARS ATLANTIC CITY; RIH ACQUISITIONS NJ, LLC T/A ATLANTIC CITY HILTON; TRUMP TAJ MAHAL CASINO RESORT; TRUMP MARINA ASSOCIATES, LLC T/A TRUMP MARINA HOTEL CASINO; TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES, LLC T/A TRUMP PLAZA HOTEL AND CASINO; ADAMAR OF NEW JERSEY, INC. T/A TROPICANA CASINO & RESORT; MARINA ASSOCIATES T/A HARRAH’S CASINO HOTEL; ATLANTIC CITY SHOWBOAT, INC. T/A SHOWBOAT HOTEL CASINO; RESORTS INTERNATIONAL HOTEL, INC. T/A RESORTS ATLANTIC CITY; MARINA DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC D/B/A BORGATA HOTEL CASINO & SPA; AND ACE GAMING, LLC D/B/A SANDS HOTEL AND CASINO; PLAINTIFFS-MOVANTS, v. CASINO CONTROL COMMISSION; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION OF GAMING ENFORCEMENT; THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; JON CORZINE, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

July 3, 2006.

JAMES R. ZAZZALI, Associate Justice.

The within matter having been initiated by the Casino Association of New Jersey, which filed a motion with this Court pursuant to *Rule*2:9-8 seeking emergent relief in the form of a single-Justice order for temporary restraints and an issuance of a writ in lieu of mandamus to respondents Governor Corzine and the Casino Control Commission;

And the movants having argued that the loss or suspension of the use of a casino license for even a short period of time would inflict devastating harm on the gaming industry, the State, and its citizens and would constitute an unconstitutional taking;

*245And respondents having answered that relief is precluded by the separation of powers doctrine and that movants are not otherwise entitled to the relief requested;

And the Appellate Division previously having denied relief to movants pending disposition of the appeal in that court;

And the Court having carefully reviewed the submissions of the parties;

And the Court having heard oral argument today, July 3, 2006, and having given due consideration to the arguments of counsel;

And the Court being satisfied that movants have not established sufficient grounds for relief;

It is on this 3rd day of July, 2006, ORDERED that the motion for emergent relief is DENIED.
**CH** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0517 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. SHANE CLARK JOHNSON ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including November 14 , 202 3 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the State’s response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 2 2023

10/02/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0517
Case 2:11-cv-02068-WJM-MF Document 47 Filed 04/18/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 976
Case 2:11-cv-02068-WJM-MF Document 47 Filed 04/18/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 977
exhibit109.htm










EXHIBIT 10.9


 


2013 DIRECTOR FEES


(Revised to reflect an increase in Deferred Stock Units)


 



	  	  	  
	
Retainer Fee:

	
  

	
$232,000/per year


Cash: $86,000


Stock Options: $43,000


Deferred Stock Units*: $103,000


	  	  
	
Non-Executive Chairman of the Board Fee:

	
  

	
$200,000/per year in Deferred Stock Units


	  	  
	
Committee Chair Fee for Compensation, CGC and Finance Committees:

	
  

	
$10,000/per year


	  	  
	
Audit Committee Chair Fee:

	
  

	
$20,000/per year


	  	  
	
Audit Committee Member Retainer Fee:

	
  

	
$5,000/per year


	  	  
	
Lead Director Retainer Fee:

	
  

	
$25,000/per year







 



	
*

	
Deferred Stock Units are “phantom” units of LNC Common Stock that are credited under the LNC Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan.







 


All cash fees may be deferred, at a Director’s election, pursuant to the LNC Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan.


 


Meeting fees may be paid in some cases for meetings which exceed the number of annually scheduled meetings ($1,100 per meeting) as determined by the Corporate Governance Committee.


 


All fees are paid to the directors on a quarterly basis in arrears.
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the interim report of DoMark International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, R. Thomas Kidd, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

DOMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC.


By /s/ R. Thomas Kidd
  ------------------------------------------
  R. Thomas Kidd
  Chairman, CEO
  (Sole executive officer of the registrant)
  January 14, 2011
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-2518 (MLC)

for the benefit of PACE :

CONSTRUCTION INC., : OPINION & ORDER

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

UNIVERSAL CONSTRUCTION :

COMPANY, INC., et al., :

:

Defendants. :

 :

DEFAULT has been entered against the defendant Universal

Construction Company, Inc. (“UCCI”). (See 6-2-11 unnumbered dkt.

entry.) See Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a).

THE PLAINTIFF now moves for entry of judgment by default

against UCCI. (See dkt. entry no. 16, Notice of Mot.) See

Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b). But it is apparent that the plaintiff intends

to continue to prosecute the action against the other defendants. 

Thus, a complete judgment entered against UCCI would not end the

litigation, thereby giving rise to (1) piecemeal litigation, and

(2) the possibility of a double recovery for the plaintiff.

THE DECISION to either enter judgment by default or refuse

to enter such judgment rests in the Court’s discretion. See

Emcasco Ins. Co. v. Sambrick, 834 F.2d 71, 74 (3d Cir. 1987). 

The Court intends to grant the part of the motion seeking entry

Case 3:11-cv-02518-MLC-LHG Document 19 Filed 11/07/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 160
of judgment by default only on the issue of liability against

UCCI, and deny the part of the motion seeking entry of judgment

by default on the issue of damages. The plaintiff may seek

judgment on the issue of damages against UCCI when the liability

of each of the other defendants has been ascertained.

FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING:

2

Case 3:11-cv-02518-MLC-LHG Document 19 Filed 11/07/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 161
IT IS THEREFORE on this 7th day of November, 2011,

ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion for entry of judgment by

default against the defendant Universal Construction Company,

Inc. (dkt. entry no. 16) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS

FOLLOWS:

GRANTED TO THE EXTENT that it seeks entry of judgment

by default on the issue of liability against the defendant

Universal Construction Company, Inc., and

DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE EXTENT that it seeks

entry of judgment by default on the issue of damages against the

defendant Universal Construction Company, Inc.; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that JUDGMENT IS ENTERED on default

against the defendant Universal Construction Company, Inc., and

in favor of the plaintiff on the issue of liability.

 s/ Mary L. Cooper 

MARY L. COOPER

United States District Judge

3

Case 3:11-cv-02518-MLC-LHG Document 19 Filed 11/07/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 162
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Everyday Assembly  Productions,
Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending  December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Daniel
L.  Hodges,  President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:11-cr-00132-DRD Document 35 Filed 03/03/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 90
Case 2:11-cr-00132-DRD Document 35 Filed 03/03/11 Page 2 of 9 PageID: 91
Case 2:11-cr-00132-DRD Document 35 Filed 03/03/11 Page 3 of 9 PageID: 92
Case 2:11-cr-00132-DRD Document 35 Filed 03/03/11 Page 4 of 9 PageID: 93
Case 2:11-cr-00132-DRD Document 35 Filed 03/03/11 Page 5 of 9 PageID: 94
Case 2:11-cr-00132-DRD Document 35 Filed 03/03/11 Page 6 of 9 PageID: 95
Case 2:11-cr-00132-DRD Document 35 Filed 03/03/11 Page 7 of 9 PageID: 96
Case 2:11-cr-00132-DRD Document 35 Filed 03/03/11 Page 8 of 9 PageID: 97
Case 2:11-cr-00132-DRD Document 35 Filed 03/03/11 Page 9 of 9 PageID: 98
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5062 

For the relief of Helene Jensen. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2004 

Mr. SHAW introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Helene Jensen. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR HELENE 

4 JENSEN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Helene Jensen shall be eligible for issuance of an im8 migrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien 

9 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 

10 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec11 tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful 

12 permanent resident. 
2 

•HR 5062 IH 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Helene Jensen en2 ters the United States before the filing deadline specified 

3 in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have entered 

4 and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be 

5 eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 

6 Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the en7 actment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Helene Jensen, the Secretary of State shall in16 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

17 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi18 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun19 try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi20 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 

21 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na22 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 
3 

•HR 5062 IH 

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Helene Jensen shall not, 

2 by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi3 lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Æ
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

24. Unemployed persons by marital status, race, age, and sex

Marital status, race, and age

Men Women

Thousands of

persons

Unemployment

rates

Thousands of

persons

Unemployment

rates

1997 1998 1997 1998 1997 1998 1997 1998

 Total, 16 years and over ............................................. 3,577 3,266 4.9 4.4 3,162 2,944 5.0 4.6

Married, spouse present ................................................... 1,167 1,034 2.7 2.4 1,047 985 3.1 2.9

Widowed, divorced, or separated ..................................... 504 435 5.8 4.8 660 628 5.2 4.9

Single (never married) ...................................................... 1,906 1,798 9.2 8.5 1,455 1,332 8.8 7.8

 White, 16 years and over ............................................ 2,641 2,431 4.2 3.9 2,195 2,053 4.2 3.9

Married, spouse present ................................................... 957 836 2.5 2.2 855 808 2.9 2.7

Widowed, divorced, or separated ..................................... 382 334 5.3 4.5 461 449 4.6 4.4

Single (never married) ...................................................... 1,303 1,261 7.8 7.4 879 797 7.1 6.3

 Black, 16 years and over ............................................ 747 671 10.2 8.9 813 756 9.9 9.0

Married, spouse present ................................................... 141 133 4.3 3.9 131 120 5.2 4.5

Widowed, divorced, or separated ..................................... 99 84 8.3 6.9 172 156 7.7 7.0

Single (never married) ...................................................... 506 455 17.7 15.4 510 480 15.0 13.5

 Total, 25 years and over ............................................. 2,246 1,998 3.6 3.2 2,069 1,926 3.9 3.6

Married, spouse present ................................................... 1,095 980 2.6 2.3 943 878 2.9 2.7

Widowed, divorced, or separated ..................................... 478 415 5.6 4.8 612 590 4.9 4.8

Single (never married) ...................................................... 674 602 6.2 5.5 514 458 6.3 5.4

 White, 25 years and over ............................................ 1,700 1,516 3.2 2.8 1,458 1,361 3.3 3.1

Married, spouse present ................................................... 899 790 2.4 2.1 770 717 2.7 2.5

Widowed, divorced, or separated ..................................... 359 318 5.1 4.4 426 418 4.4 4.3

Single (never married) ...................................................... 442 407 5.1 4.7 263 226 4.6 3.8

 Black, 25 years and over ............................................ 420 373 6.9 6.0 510 471 7.6 6.8

Married, spouse present ................................................... 129 126 4.0 3.8 117 109 4.8 4.3

Widowed, divorced, or separated ..................................... 97 81 8.2 6.8 162 151 7.4 6.9

Single (never married) ...................................................... 195 166 11.5 9.5 231 211 11.0 9.5

 NOTE: Beginning in January 1998, data reflect new composite estimation procedures and revised population controls used in the household survey.

200
LNT 12.31.2012 10-K Ex 10.15






Exhibit 10.15
ALLIANT ENERGY CORPORATION
INTERSTATE POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
WISCONSIN POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY


Summary of Compensation and Benefits for
Non-Employee Directors 
Effective January 1, 2013


Effective January 1, 2013, the aggregate compensation for non-employee members of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Alliant Energy Corporation, Interstate Power and Light Company and Wisconsin Power and Light Company will be as follows:
Non-employee members of the Board will be entitled to receive the following annual retainers as applicable:
•$170,000 for each non-employee director;
•$20,000 for the Lead Independent Director of the Board;
•$13,500 for the Chairperson of the Audit Committee of the Board;
•$3,500 for each member of the Audit Committee of the Board other than the Chairperson; and
		
	•
	$7,500 for the Chairperson of each of the Compensation and Personnel Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee, and the Nuclear, Health and Safety Committee of the Board.




Payments of all retainers shall be in cash and shall be paid quarterly in advance.


Each director may, and is encouraged to, voluntarily elect an amount of any of the cash compensation retainers to purchase common stock of Alliant Energy Corporation under the Shareowner Direct Plan or to have an amount be deferred in the Alliant Energy Deferred Compensation Plan Stock Account.


Alliant Energy Corporation maintains a Director's Charitable Award Program for directors who were elected or appointed to the Board on or prior to January 1, 2005. Under the Program, when a director dies, Alliant Energy Corporation will donate a total of $500,000 to one qualified charitable organization or divide that amount among a maximum of five qualified charitable organizations selected by the individual director. All deductions for charitable contributions are taken by Alliant Energy Corporation, and the donations are funded by Alliant Energy Corporation through life insurance policies on the directors.