alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
If. T

I

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

HACKENSACK DENTAL

ASSOCIATES,

Plaintiff, Civil Action No, I :11ev-I 712 (FSH/MAH)

V.

BLUECROSS E3LUESHIELD OF CONSENT ORDER OF VOLUNTARY

ILLINOIS, HEALTH CARE SERVICES DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDI

CORPORATiON and DENTAL

NETWORK OF AMERICA, Document Electronically Filed

Defendants,

WHEREAS the Parties having conferred and agreed to a Term Sheet for Binding

Arbitration ofthe dental claims in dispute between the Plaintiff and the Defendants; and

WHEREAS the Parties intend and agree to further memorialize their intent to arbitrate

such disputed dental claims in a formal Agreement to Arbitrate; and

THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the

undersigned counsel for the parties herein, as follows:

1. the within litigation shall be voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to

Fed, R. Civ. P. 41 and without costs;

2. if the parties do not execute a final Arbitration Agreement, as contemplated by the

Term Sheet for Binding Arbitration, by July 10, 2012 or the parties fail to complete Binding

Arbitration, this matter may be reinstated by the parties;

3. the parties will separately address a tolling agreement that will apply in the event

that this mattei’ is reinstated pursuant to paragraph 2 of this consent order; and

4. if this matter is not the subject of Binding Arbitration and is reinstated by the

1777566-

AJ749543 1O3 I

Case 2:11-cv-01712-FSH-MAH Document 71 Filed 05/31/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 382
Plaintiff pursuant to paragraph 2 of this consent order, Defendants waive the iight to costs

pursuant to Fed, R. Civ. P. 4I(d)

So orderecL

McELROY DEUTSCH MULVANEY &

CARPENTER, LLP

Atiorneysfor PlaintijjHackensack Dental

Associates

By:

Leonirdo M, Tambuy€llo, Esq.

Dated:

1777566-

( (

BINOHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

Attorneysfor Defendants BlueCross

BlueShield ofIllinois, Health care

Service Corporation and Dental

Network ofAmerica

Dated: 512

The undersigned hereby consent to the form and entry ofthe within order.

A1749543 103 I

Case 2:11-cv-01712-FSH-MAH Document 71 Filed 05/31/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 383
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 130 (Thursday, July 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 32909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16154]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 785-018-MI]


Consumers Energy Company; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

June 29, 2009.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) regulations, 
18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47879), the Office of Energy 
Projects reviewed the application for a new license for the Calkins 
Bridge Hydroelectric Project, located on the Kalamazoo River in Allegan 
County, Michigan, and prepared an environmental assessment (EA). In the 
EA, Commission staff analyze the potential environmental effects of 
relicensing the project and conclude that issuing a new license for the 
project, with appropriate environmental measures, would not constitute 
a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human 
environment.
    A copy of the EA is on file with the Commission and is available 
for public inspection. The EA may also be viewed on the Commission's 
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the 
docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number 
field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online 
Support at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#64222136272b0a080d0a01371114140b161024020116074a030b12"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bef8fbecfdf1d0d2d7d0dbedcbceced1cccafed8dbccdd90d9d1c8">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, 
or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of new filings and 
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, 
contact FERC Online Support.
    Any comments should be filed within 30 days from the issuance date 
of this notice, and should be addressed to the Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Room 1-A, 
Washington, DC 20426. Please affix ``Calkins Bridge Project No. 785-
018'' to all comments. Comments may be filed electronically via 
Internet in lieu of paper. The Commission strongly encourages 
electronic filings. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions 
on the Commission's Web site under the ``eFiling'' link. For further 
information, contact Timothy Konnert at (202) 502-6359.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-16154 Filed 7-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

:

John Sosa Civil No.: 10-3354(KSH) 

 

 :

 Petitioner

 -vs- : ORDER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

 Respondent :

A petition to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant

to 28 USC 2255, having been filed in the above matter;

IT IS on this 23 day of August, 2010 rd

O R D E R E D that the respondent(s) United States of

America and the Attorney General of the United States of America

file an answer to said petition on or before October 8, 2010

accompanied by a certified copy of all briefs, appendices,

opinions, process, pleadings, transcripts and orders filed in the

proceedings under attack, or such of them as may be material to

the questions raised in the petition.

 /s/ Katharine S. Hayden 

 Katharine S. Hayden, USDJ

Case 2:10-cv-03354-KSH Document 6 Filed 08/23/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 26
Order entered June 7 , 2016

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 16

- 00361

- CR

ASHLEY MEGAN CATENA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Cour t Cause No. 296

- 82264

- 2015



### O RDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DIRECT t he Clerk to issue the mandate in

this appeal INSTANTER

.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE

JUSTICE
**Exhibit
      1.3**


**Amendment
      to Articles of Association of the Registrant**





At
      the
      2004 annual general meeting, our shareholders adopted the following amendments
      to our Articles of Association that were in effect at such time (all capitalized
      terms used below have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Articles of
      Association):




1.
            Paragraph
                (d) of Article 80 was deleted in its
                entirety.









2.
            Paragraph
                (a) of Article 87 was deleted in its entirety and replaced by the
                following paragraph:









“87.  (a).  Directors
      (other than External Directors referred to in paragraph (c) of this Article
      87)
      shall be elected at the Annual General Meeting by an Ordinary Resolution. The
      Directors, other than External Directors, shall be divided into three (3)
      classes, each consisting of approximately one-third of the non-External
      Directors. The three classes are to be designated Class A, Class B, and Class
      C
      and shall initially consist of one director, one director and two directors,
      respectively. The term of office of the director in Class A shall expire at
      the
      end of the first Annual General Meeting after his or her initial election;
      the
      term of office of the director in Class B shall expire at the end of the second
      Annual General Meeting after his or her initial election; and the term of office
      of the directors in Class C shall expire at the end of the third Annual General
      Meeting after their initial election. At each Annual General Meeting after
      the
      initial classification of the Board, the class of directors whose term expires
      at the time of such election shall be elected to hold office until the third
      succeeding Annual General Meeting. Each director shall hold office until the
      end
      of the Annual General Meeting at which his or her term ends, or until his or
      her
      office is vacated pursuant to these Articles or the Companies Law. The General
      Meeting is not entitled to remove from office any director, other than an
      External Director, prior to the end of the Annual General Meeting at which
      his
      or her term ends.”













****************
James E. Cecchi 

Lindsey H. Taylor 

Donald E. Ecklund 

CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, 

OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO 

5 Becker Farm Rd. 

Roseland, NJ 07068 

(973) 994-1700 

Christopher M. Burke 

SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, 

LLP 

707 Broadway, Suite 1000 

San Diego, CA 92101 

(619) 233-4565 

Joseph P. Guglielmo 

SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, 

LLP 

The Chrysler Building 

405 Lexington Ave., 40th Floor 

New York, NY 10174 

(212) 223-6444 

Counsel for Plaintiffs and Class Counsel 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

IN RE: 

NUTELLA MARKETING AND SALES 

PRACTICES LITIGATION 

Civil Action No. 11-1086(FLW)(DEA) 

NOTICE OF MOTION 

To: All Persons on ECF Service List 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Monday, March 21, 2016, at 10 a.m. or as soon 

thereafter as counsel may be heard, the undersigned counsel for Plaintiffs Marnie Glover and 

Jayme Kaczmarek shall move before Hon. Freda L. Wolfson, U.S.D.J. at the United States 

Courthouse, 402 East State Street, Trenton, New Jersey for an Order approving: (1) the final 

accounting of the settlement proceeds; and (2) payment of the undisbursed settlement proceeds 

of $360,904.92, to the proposed cy pres beneficiaries: (i) Consumer Federation of America 

(“CFA”); and (ii) National Consumer Law Center (“NCLC”); and (iii) America’s Grow a Row, 

in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement dated January 10, 2012, that was 

Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 149 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 2485
2 

finally approved by this Court on July 31, 2012. Defendant consents to the relief sought in this 

motion. 

The undersigned intends to rely upon the annexed Brief, and the Declarations of Mark 

Cowen, Stephen Brobeck, Chip Paillex, and Richard E. Dubois. 

The undersigned hereby requests oral argument in the event timely opposition papers are 

filed. 

CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, 

OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO 

Counsel for Plaintiff Kaczmarek and Class Counsel

By: /s/ Lindsey H. Taylor 

 LINDSEY H. TAYLOR 

Dated: February 17, 2016 

Christopher M. Burke 

SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP 

707 Broadway, Suite 1000 

San Diego, CA 92101 

(619) 233-4565 

Joseph P. Guglielmo 

SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP 

The Chrysler Building 

405 Lexington Ave., 40th Floor 

New York, NY 10174 

(212) 223-6444 

Counsel for Plaintiff Glover and Class Counsel 

Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 149 Filed 02/17/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2486
EXHIBIT 32.1

OFFICERS CERTIFICATIONS

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Douglas Emmett, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 7, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ JORDAN L. KAPLAN
|                       |  |  |  |    
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Jordan L. Kaplan                     
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Douglas Emmett, Inc.                 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 15.1











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM









We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-42000, 333-115003, 333-135435, 333-141307, 333-149825, and 333-158839 on Form S-8 of our reports dated April 8, 2010, relating to the financial statements of ClickSoftware Technologies Ltd. (the “Company”), and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009.









/s/ Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.


Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.


Certified Public Accountants


A Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu




Tel Aviv, Israel


April 8, 2010
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Alfredo Garcia, Interim Chief Financial Officer of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC, the general partner of Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P., the general partner of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. (the Partnership), hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



|                  |  |                                                 
|----------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 9, 2008 |  | /s/ Alfredo Garcia                              
|                  |  | Alfredo Garcia                                  
|                  |  | Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and
|                  |  | Interim Chief Financial Officer of Eagle Rock   
|                  |  | Energy G&P, LLC, General Partner of Eagle Rock  
|                  |  | Energy GP, L.P., General Partner of Eagle Rock  
|                  |  | Energy Partners, L.P.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ZipGlobal Holdings, Inc. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Michael C. Lee, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
      Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      my knowledge:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Date:
                November 9, 2007
            
            /s/
                MICHAEL C. LEEMichael
                C. LeePresident
                and Chief Executive Officer
              ZipGlobal
                Holdings, Inc.
              (Principal
                Executive Officer and Principal
              Accounting
                Officer)
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Rafeh Hulays, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pointstar
Entertainment Corp. for the interim period ended July 31, 2007 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Pointstar Entertainment Corp.

Dated: September 11, 2007



*/s/ Rafeh Hulays*
  Rafeh Hulays 
  Chief Financial Officer 
  (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pointstar
Entertainment Corp. and will be retained by Pointstar Entertainment Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### In the Matter of Stanley Dixon, Petitioner, v Francis A. Nicolai, as Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New *1000York, et al., Respondents.

[822 NYS2d 738]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition to enjoin the respondent Francis A. Nicolai, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, from enforcing an order of that court dated June 15, 2005, in a criminal action entitled *People v Dixon,*pending in that court under indictment No. 02-01353. Motion by the Westchester County District Attorney to dismiss the proceeding.

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” *(Matter of Holtzman v*Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; *see Matter of Rush v Mordue,*68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Crane, J.P, Spolzino, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Charlie Lee, Principal Accounting Officer of
Pure Pharmaceuticals Corp. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
      period ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                   

Date: February 12, 2010



/s/ Charlie
LeeCharlie LeeSecretary and Principal Accounting Officer

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Bryan LESTER, a/k/a Mark Shepard, a/k/a Kentucky, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-7749.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 13, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 19, 2012.

Richard Bryan Lester, Appellant Pro Se.

Lisa Rae McKeel, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Bryan Lester seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on *260his motions seeking reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The order is not ap-pealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lester has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*