alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The Burgundia.1 Straus and others *v.*The Burgundia, etc.

*(Circuit Court, E. D. New York.*

June 21, 1886.)

Cahethrs—Oi? Goods—Ships—Damage to Cargo—Improper Stowage.

On tlie delivery qf a consignment of eight drums of glycerine, two wore found 1o he broken! On suit brought for the loss, *held,*that if all eight were stowed in an equally proper place, then the stowage of the two could not, in detail and arrangement,, have been proper or sufficient. If the two were *608stowed in a less safe place than the-six, considering the peculiar character of the drums, that was improper stowage; and therefore that the carrier had not relieved himself from the presumption of negligent stowage as the cause of the loss, and that the vessel was liable for the loss.

In Admiralty.

*L. H. Arnold, Jr.,*for libelants.

*Lorenzo Ullo,*for claimant.

1

 Reported by R. D. *&*Wyllys Benedict, Esqs., of the New York bar.

Blatchford, Justice.

I concur in the conclusion of the district judge that there must he a decree for the libelants.1 The case is substantially like that of *The*Surrey,2 in this court. The six drums came in .good order, whatever perils of the sea there were, if the two drums which were broken had been stowed properly, they would not have heen injured. If all eight were stowed in an equally proper place, then the stowage of the two could not, in detail and arrangement, have been proper or sufficient. If the two were stowed in a less safe place than the six, considering the peculiar character of the drums, that was improper stowage. On the whole evidence, including the ■new testimony taken in this court, the carrier has not relieved itself from its liability, or successfully rebutted the presumption of negligent stowage as the cause of .the damage.

There must be a decree for the libelants for $649, with interest from March 1, 1884, aud their costs in the district court, taxed at .$129.86, and their costs in this court, to be taxed.

1

The decision of the district judge was not accompanied by an opinion.—[Reps.

2

The following is the opinion of Mr. Justice Blatciifoed in the case of *Marx*v. *The Surrey,*in the circuit court, E. D. of New York, July 2, 1885, (not heretofore reported:)

Blatchfobd, Justice. On the new proofs taken in this court it appears that on the •same voyage the vessel carried 35 drums of glycerine consigned to one Korneman, which were delivered on arrival in the same good order as when received. In view of this fact, and of all the evidence in the case, it cannot be held that the carrier has relieved himself from the liability thrown on him by his bill of lading, by showing the existen oe of a sea peril sufficient to account for the damage to the libelants’ drums, and to rebut the presumption of negligent stowage as the cause of such damage. Let there be a de■cree for the libelants, with a reference to ascertain the damages.
#### Rogers *v.*Riessner and another.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

July 23, 1887.)

Equity—Cross-Bum—Leave to Serve.

After a decree had been rendered in a cause on proofs taken, the defendants obtained an order from another judge allowing them to serve a cross-hill. Afterwards a motion by complainant to set aside this order was sent for hearing to the judge who granted it, and returned by him to the judge who made the decree, when if appeared that the order" was signed on formal proofs only, without knowledge of any hearing in the cause; the petition for leave to serve the cross-hill merely disclosing- that an answer to the original hill had been served. *Held,*that the motion to set aside the order might be considered as a motion by defendants for leave to serve a cross-bill, and, as this involved the taking-of additional testimony, the application was too late, and the order giving leave to serve the cross-bill should be set aside.

*592In Equity. On motion to set aside order allowing service of cross-bill.

*Geo. 0. Lay,*for complainant.

*Turner, Lee & McGlure,*for defendants.

Lacombe, J.

This is a motion to set aside an order made by Judge Brown allowing defendants to serve a cross-bill. The motion, coming on for hearing before Judge Wheeler, was by him sent to Judge Brown,, who indorsed this memorandum on the papers:

> “The order was signed on a formal statement only, without knowledge of any hearing in the cause. The propriety of the application depends so largely upon the merits which were determined at the hearing that this motion should come before Judge "Wheeler, who is familiar with the merits of the case.

> “A. B.”

In view of the first clause of this memorandum, and of the fact that the petition for leave to serve cross-bill sets forth the fact that an answer to the original bill has been served, but does not disclose the fact that the case had been heard on proofs taken, and a decree rendered, the present application may be considered as a motion by defendants for leave to serve a cross-bill. Inasmuch as the defendants propose to take additional testimony under this cross-bill when served, the application is made too late. *Field*v. *Schieffelin,*7 Johns. Ch. 255; *White*v. *Buloid,*2 Paige, 164.

The order giving leave to serve the cross-bill should therefore be set aside. Order accordingly.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

______________________________

ALBERT H. ROBERTS, :

: Civ. No. 11-1793 (RMB) (AMD) 

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : ORDER

:

KAREN BALICKI, et al., :

:

Defendants. :

______________________________:

For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Opinion filed 

herewith, 

IT IS on this 26th, day of July, 2013,

ORDERED that Defendants William Gandy, Todd Horan, Miguel 

Lago, Terrance McCoy, Roger Hogan, Richard Yacovelli and Timothy 

Volov’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 85.) is GRANTED.

S/RENÉE MARIE BUMB________ 

RENÉE MARIE BUMB, U.S.D.J.

1
CERTIFICATION

I,Cliff Halling, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Wrap-N-
Roll USA, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-
14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
     including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
     by others within those entities, particularly during the
     period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
     disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90
     days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the
     "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about
     the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
     based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation
     of internal controls which could adversely affect the
     registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
     report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal
     controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
     management or other employees who have a significant role in
     the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
indicated in this annual report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: April 14, 2003       /s/ Cliff Halling
                           ____________________________
                           Cliff Halling
                           President
905 A.2d 864

#### IN THE MATTER OF JAMES PETER BYRNE, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 6, 2006.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-046, concluding that JAMES PETER BYRNE of WEST NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, should be reprimanded for violating *RPC*1.5(c) and *Rule*1:21-7(g) (failure to prepare written fee agreement), *RPC*1.7(a) and (b) (conflict of interest), *RPC*5.3(a), (b) and (c) (failure to supervise non-lawyer employees), and *RPC*8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAMES PETER BYRNE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
Tuesday, July 17, 2012 www.bls.gov

Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE) Survey

Methods Symposium

Contact the CE Workshop Team • CE_Symposium_Workshop_2012@bls.gov •

http://www.bls.gov/cex/csxannualworkshop.htm • (202) 691‐6900

8:00‐8:30 a.m.   Registration/Coffee               Central Reception Area    

8:30‐9:30 a.m. CE Methods Research Program                       Conference Room 1

 Welcome and Logistics – Adam Safir

 Overview of CE Research – Adam Safir

 Overview of Gemini Project – Kathy Downey

9:30‐10:00 a.m. Morning Break

10:00‐11:00 a.m. CNSTAT Activities to Recommend Redesign Options for the Consumer Expenditure

Survey      

 Discussion of Process and Methodological Issues – Carol House and Don Dillman

11:00‐11:30 a.m. CNSTAT Q&A          

11:30 ‐1:00 p.m. Lunch (on your own)

1:00‐3:00 p.m.  Survey Redesign Panel          

 NCES – Andy Zukerberg

 NCVS –Bill Sabol or Mike Planty

 NSDUH – Joel Kennet

 SIPP – Jason  Fields

 CE – Kathy Downey

3:00‐3:15 p.m.  Afternoon Break

3:15‐4:00 p.m.  Survey Error Discussion

 Reducing Nonresponse Bias through Responsive Design and External Benchmarks –

Julia Lee

 Experiments in Reducing Measurement Error Through Cross‐Survey Imputation:

Preliminary Findings for Diary to Interview Survey Imputations – Geoffrey Paulin

4:00‐4:30 p.m.  Concluding Remarks and Q&A
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4947

To suspend the duty on certain educational toys and devices. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2004

Mr. HERGER (for himself and Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend the duty on certain educational toys and devices.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN EDUCATIONAL TOYS AND DEVICES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.85.43 Educational toys and devices 

(provided for in subheading 

8543.89.96) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2007 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 4947 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AmTrust Financial Services,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Barry
Zyskind, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(a)
            the Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




(b)
            the information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.




By:
                /s/ Barry
      ZyskindBarry
      Zyskind
                  President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                  (Principal
      Executive Officer)




August
10, 2009
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gulf & Orient Steamship Company, Ltd. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), we, Michael Vardakis, President, and Melissa Ladakis, Secretary and Treasurer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:November 8, 2010By:/s/Michael VardakisMichael Vardakis, President  and Director  Date:November 8, 2010By:/s/Melissa LadakisMelissa Ladakis ,Secretary,  Treasurer and Director
Case 2:11-cv-01057-PGS-ES Document 10 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 586
Case 2:11-cv-01057-PGS-ES Document 10 Filed 03/11/11 Page 2 of 10 PageID: 587
Case 2:11-cv-01057-PGS-ES Document 10 Filed 03/11/11 Page 3 of 10 PageID: 588
Case 2:11-cv-01057-PGS-ES Document 10 Filed 03/11/11 Page 4 of 10 PageID: 589
Case 2:11-cv-01057-PGS-ES Document 10 Filed 03/11/11 Page 5 of 10 PageID: 590
Case 2:11-cv-01057-PGS-ES Document 10 Filed 03/11/11 Page 6 of 10 PageID: 591
Case 2:11-cv-01057-PGS-ES Document 10 Filed 03/11/11 Page 7 of 10 PageID: 592
Case 2:11-cv-01057-PGS-ES Document 10 Filed 03/11/11 Page 8 of 10 PageID: 593
Case 2:11-cv-01057-PGS-ES Document 10 Filed 03/11/11 Page 9 of 10 PageID: 594
Case 2:11-cv-01057-PGS-ES Document 10 Filed 03/11/11 Page 10 of 10 PageID: 595
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
            THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of DoMark  International,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  February 28, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, R.
Thomas Kidd, Principle Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

                                DoMark International, Inc.
                                     Registrant

Date: April 15, 2009            By: /s/ R. Thomas Kidd
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    R. Thomas Kidd
                                    Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
                                    Officer, Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34042]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16605]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-62,484]


Halmode Apparel, Halmode/Liz Claiborne Dresses, 1400 Broadway, a 
Division of Kellwood Company, New York, NY; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on January 10, 2008, applicable to workers of 
Halmode Apparel, a Division of Kellwood Company, New York, New York. 
The notice was published in the Federal Register on January 25, 2008 
(73 FR 4634).
    At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in activities related to the production women's apparel samples and 
patterns.
    New information provided by the company official shows that some of 
workers wages at Halmode Apparel are reported under Federal Employment 
Identification Number (FEIN) for Halmode Apparel/Liz Claiborne Dresses.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
include workers of Halmode Apparel, a Division of Kellwood Company, 
1400 Broadway, New York, New York, whose wages were reported under the 
FEIN for Halmode/Liz Claiborne Dresses.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-62,484 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Halmode Apparel, Halmode/Liz Claiborne Dresses, 
1400 Broadway, a Division of Kellwood Company, New York, New York, 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after November 4, 2007, through January 10, 2010, are eligible to 
apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act 
of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade 
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of July 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-16605 Filed 7-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

          - [Notice 2009-14] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public hearing and request for public comments; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Election Commission published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on July 1, 2009, a document concerning the improvement of public information disclosure via the Commission's Web site and other Internet communications. The Commission inadvertently entered the signature date on the document as March 25, 2009. This document removes that signature date and inserts the correct date, which is June 25, 2009.                     

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         This correction is effective on July 14, 2009.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mr. Robert M. Knop, Assistant General Counsel, or Ms. Cheryl A.F. Hemsley, Attorney, 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20463, (202) 694-1650 or (800) 424-9530. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

                    The Federal Election Commission published a document in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 1, 2009 (74 FR 31430), which inadvertently included an incorrect issuance date. This correction removes that date and inserts the correct date of issuance by the Commission.                 

In Notice 2009-10 published on July 1, 2009 (74 FR 31430), make the following correction. On page 31441, in the first column, on the top line, replace the date “March 25, 2009,” which appears after the word “Dated,” with “June 25, 2009.” 

On behalf of the Commission. 

Dated: July 7, 2009. 

Steven T. Walther, 

Chairman, Federal Election Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-16420 Filed 7-13-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P