34590 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 135 / Thursday, July 16, 2009 / Notices 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain machine vision 

software, machine vision systems, or 

products containing same that infringe 

one or more of claims 1–6, 8, 12, 18–21, 

24, 25, and 33–35 of U.S. Patent No. 

7,016,539; 1, 11–13, 21, 28–30, 39, 47, 

54, and 55 of U.S. Patent No. 7,065,262; 

and claims 1–10 of U.S. Patent No. 

6,959,112, and whether an industry in 

the United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainants are— 

Cognex Corporation, One Vision Drive, 

Natick, MA 01760; 

Cognex Technology & Investment 

Corporation, 465 North Wisman Road, 

Suite 200, Mountain View, CA 94043. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the amended complaint is to be 

served: 

MVTec Software GmbH, Neherstr. 1, 

81675 Mu ̈nchen, Germany; 

MVTec LLC, 1 Broadway, Cambridge, 

MA 02142; 

E. Zoller GmbH & Co. KG, GottliebDaimler-Strasse 19, 74385 

Pleidelsheim, Germany; 

Zoller, Inc., 3753 Plaza Drive, Suite #1, 

Ann Arbor, MI 48108; 

Fuji Machine Manufacturing Co., Ltd., 

19 Chausuyama, Yamamachi, Chiryu, 

Aichi 472–8686, Japan; 

Fuji America Corporation, 171 

Corporate Woods Parkway, Vernon 

Hills, IL 60061; 

Omron Corporation, Gate City Osaki, 

West Tower 15F, 1–11–1, Osaki, 

Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141–0032, 

Japan; 

Resolution Technology, Inc., 5990 

Wilcox Place, Suite B, Dublin, OH 

43016; 

Subtechnique, Inc., 4950–C Eisenhower 

Ave., Alexandria, VA 22304; 

Visics Corp., 70 Hastings Street, 

Wellesley, MA 02181; 

Daiichi Jitsugyo Viswill Co., Ltd., 12–43, 

Honami-cho, Suita City, Osaka 564– 

0042, Japan; 

Daiichi Jitsugyo (America), Inc., 939 

A.E.C. Drive, Wood Dale, IL 60191; 

Amistar Automation, Inc., 1269 Linda 

Vista, San Marcos, CA 92078; 

Techno Soft Systemnics, Inc., Naniwa 

Ward, Ebisunishi 2-chome Sakae, 

Shiyou Building, No. 17, Osaka 556– 

0003, Japan; 

IDS Imaging Development Systems 

GmbH, Dimbacher Str. 6, Obersulm 

74182, Germany; 

IDS Imaging Development Systems, Inc., 

400 West Cummings Park, Suite 3400, 

Woburn, MA 01801; 

YXLON International GmbH, Essener 

Bogen 15, Hamburg D–22419, 

Germany; 

YXLON International, Inc., 3400 

Gilchrist Road, Mogadore, OH 44260; 

Rasco GmbH, Geigelsteinstrasse 6, 

Kolbermoor 83059, Germany; 

Delta Design, Inc., 12367 Crosthwaite 

Circle, Poway, CA 92064; 

Multitest Elektronische Systeme GmbH, 

A ̈ ussere Oberaustrasse 4, Rosenheim 

83026, Germany; 

Multitest Electronic Systems, Inc., 3021 

Kenneth Street, Santa Clara, CA 

95054. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Kevin Baer, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

Paul J. Luckern, Chief Administrative 

Law Judge, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, shall designate the 

presiding Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the amended complaint 

and the notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the amended complaint 

and the notice of investigation. 

Extensions of time for submitting 

responses to the amended complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

amended complaint and in this notice 

may be deemed to constitute a waiver of 

the right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the amended complaint 

and this notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the amended complaint and 

this notice and to enter an initial 

determination and a final determination 

containing such findings, and may 

result in the issuance of an exclusion 

order or a cease and desist order or both 

directed against the respondent. 

Issued: July 13, 2009. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–16901 Filed 7–15–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[USITC SE–09–021] 

Government in the Sunshine Act 

Meeting Notice 

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United 

States International Trade Commission. 

TIME AND DATE: July 20, 2009 at 1 p.m. 

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 

(202) 205–2000. 

STATUS: Open to the public. 

Matters To Be Considered 

1. Agenda for future meetings: none. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. Nos. 701–TA–466 and 731– 

TA–1162 (Preliminary)(Wire Decking 

from China)—briefing and vote. (The 

Commission is currently scheduled to 

transmit its determinations to the 

Secretary of Commerce on July 20, 2009; 

Commissioners’ opinions are currently 

scheduled to be transmitted to the 

Secretary of Commerce on or before July 

27, 2009.) 

5. Outstanding action jackets: none. 

In accordance with Commission 

policy, subject matter listed above, not 

disposed of at the scheduled meeting, 

may be carried over to the agenda of the 

following meeting. Earlier 

announcement of this meeting was not 

possible. 

Issued: July 13, 2009. 

By order of the Commission. 

William R. Bishop, 

Hearings and Meetings Coordinator. 

[FR Doc. E9–16957 Filed 7–14–09; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Office of Justice Programs 

[OMB Number 1121–0249] 

Bureau of Justice Statistics; Agency 

Information Collection Activities: 

Proposed Collection; Extension of a 

Currently Approved Collection; 

Comment Request 

ACTION: 60-day notice of information 

collection under review: Deaths in 

Custody—series of collections from 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 135 / Thursday, July 16, 2009 / Notices 34591 

local jails, State prisons and juvenile 

detention centers, and law enforcement. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), 

Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Bureau 

of Justice Statistics (BJS) will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection is 

published to obtain comments from the 

public and affected agencies. Comments 

are encouraged and will be accepted for 

‘‘sixty days’’ until September 14, 2009. 

This process is in accordance with 5 

CFR 1320.10. 

If you have comments especially on 

the estimated public burden or 

associated response time, suggestions, 

or need a copy of the proposed 

information collection instrument with 

instructions or additional information, 

please contact Margaret Noonan, 

Statistician, (202) 353–2060, Bureau of 

Justice Statistics, 810 Seventh St., NW., 

Washington, DC 20531. 

Request written comments and 

suggestions from the public and affected 

agencies concerning the proposed 

collection of information. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g. permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of this information 

collection: 

(1) Type of information collection: 

Extension of currently approved 

collection. 

(2) The title of the Form/Collection: 

Deaths in Custody Reporting Program. 

(3) The agency form number, if any, 

and the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

Forms: CJ–9 Quarterly Report on 

Inmates Under Jail Jurisdiction, CJ–9A 

Annual Summary on Inmates Under Jail 

Jurisdiction, CJ–10 Quarterly Report on 

Inmates in Private or Multi-Jurisdiction 

Jails, CJ–10A Annual Summary on 

Inmates in Private of Multi-Jurisdiction 

Jails, NPS–4 Quarterly Summary of 

Inmate Deaths in State Prison, NPS–4A 

State Prison Inmate Death Report, CJ–11 

Quarterly Summary of Arrest-Related 

Deaths, and CJ–11A Arrest-Related 

Death Report. Corrections Statistics 

Program, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 

Office of Justice Programs, United States 

Department of Justice. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

to respond, as well as a brief abstract: 

Local jail administrators, State prison 

administrators. Other: State-level central 

reporters from each State’s criminal 

justice Statistical Analysis Center (SAC) 

as well as reporters from the District of 

Columbia and the New York City Police 

Department. 

One reporter from each of the 3,000 

local jail jurisdictions and one reporter 

from each of the 50 prison systems in 

the United States are asked to provide 

information for the following categories: 

(a) The number of inmates as of 

January 1 and December 31st of each 

reporting year, by gender, either actual 

or estimated (local jails only); 

(b) The number of inmates admitted 

between January 1 and December 31st of 

each reporting year (local jails only); 

(c) The average daily population of all 

jail confinement facilities operated by 

the jurisdiction, by gender, in the 

previous year (local jails only); 

(d) During each reporting quarter, the 

number of inmate deaths; 

(e) The full name, date of birth, 

gender, race/Hispanic origin and date of 

death for each inmate who died during 

the reporting quarter; 

(f) The admission date, legal status 

and current offenses for each inmate 

who died during the reporting quarter; 

(g) Where the inmate died within the 

correctional facilities; 

(h) Whether an autopsy/post-mortem 

to determine the cause of death of the 

inmate was performed and the 

availability of those results; 

(i) The location and cause of death of 

each inmate death that took place 

during the reporting quarter; 

(j) Whether the cause of death was a 

pre-existing medical condition or a 

condition that developed after 

admission to the facility and whether 

the inmate received treatment for the 

medical condition after admission and if 

so, the kind of treatment received 

(illness—including AIDS—deaths only, 

deaths due to accidental injury, 

intoxication, suicide or homicide do not 

apply); 

(k) The time of day that the incident 

causing the inmate’s death occurred and 

where the incident occurred (limited to 

accidents, suicides and homicides only); 

(l) The survey ends with a small 

‘notes’ block. 

Fifty-two state-level central reporters 

(one reporter from each state, one from 

the District of Columbia and one from 

the New York City Police Department) 

will be asked by BJS to provide 

information on the following categories: 

(a) During each reporting quarter, the 

number of deaths of persons during the 

process of arrest by State and local law 

enforcement; 

(b) The deceased’s name, date of birth, 

gender, race/Hispanic origin and legal 

status at the time of death; 

(c) The date and location of death, the 

manner and medical cause of death and 

whether an autopsy was performed; 

(d) The law enforcement agency 

involved and the offenses for which the 

inmate was being charged; 

(e) In cases of death prior to booking, 

whether the death was the result of a 

medical condition or injuries sustained 

at the crime or arrest scene and whether 

the officer(s) involved used any 

weapons to cause the death; 

(f) In cases of death prior to booking, 

whether the deceased was under 

restraint, including the use of 

conducted-energy devices, in the time 

leading up to the death, and whether 

their behavior at the arrest scene 

included threats or the use of any force 

against the arresting officer(s); 

(g) In cases of death after booking, the 

time and date of the deceased’s entry 

into the law enforcement booking 

facility where the death occurred, and 

the medical and mental condition of the 

deceased at the time of entry; 

(h) In cases of death after booking, 

who caused the death and what were 

the means of death, e.g., suicide by 

hanging (limited to accidental deaths, 

homicides and suicides only). 

The Bureau of Justice Statistics uses this 

information in published reports and 

statistics. The reports will be made 

available to the U.S. Congress, Executive 

Office of the President, practitioners, 

researchers, students, the media, and 

others interested in criminal justice 

statistics. 

(5) An estimated 3,102 total 

respondents will submit an estimated 

19,308 responses each year to this 

collection program. The amount of time 

needed for a typical respondent to 

complete each form is broken down as 

follows: 

Local jails/quarterly (forms CJ–9 and 

CJ–10)—3,000 respondents: 

Approximately 85% of jails nationwide 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
34592 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 135 / Thursday, July 16, 2009 / Notices 

have zero deaths in a given calendar 

year, and even greater percentage would 

have zero deaths in a given calendar 

quarter. Respondents reporting a zero 

will need an average of 5 minutes to 

respond. For jurisdictions reporting a 

death, the average response time is 

estimated at 30 minutes per death, for 

a total of 1,550 hours devoted to 

reporting data on deaths in jails. 

Local jails/annual (forms CJ–9A and 

CJ–10A)—3,000 respondents will have 

an average response time of 15 minutes 

per form, for a total of 750 hours. 

State prison/quarterly (form NPS–4)— 

50 respondents are estimated to have an 

average response time of 5 minutes per 

form, for a total of 17 hours. 

State prisons addendum/quarterly 

(form NPS–4A)—50 respondents are 

estimated to have an average response 

time of 30 minutes per death, for a total 

of 1,600 hours. 

State and local law enforcement/ 

quarterly (CJ–11)—52 respondents are 

estimated to have an average response 

time of 5 minutes per form, for a total 

of 17 hours. 

State and local law enforcement 

addendum/quarterly (CJ–11A)—52 

respondents are estimated to have an 

average response time of 60 minutes per 

death, for a total of 700 hours. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: 4,634 annual burden hours. 

If additional information is required, 

contact: Lynn Bryant, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building, 

Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: July 8, 2009. 

Lynn Bryant, 

Department Clearance Officer, PRA, United 

States Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. E9–16589 Filed 7–15–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–18–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993; the Association of PublicSafety Communications Officials 

International 

Notice is hereby given that, on May 

22, 2009, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the 

National Cooperative Research and 

Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 

et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), The Association of 

Public-Safety Communications Officials 

International (‘‘APCO’’) has filed written 

notifications simultaneously with the 

Attorney General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing (1) the name and 

principal place of business of the 

standards development organization 

and (2) the nature and scope of its 

standards development activities. The 

notifications were filed for the purpose 

of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting 

the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 

actual damages under specified 

circumstances. 

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, 

the name and principal place of 

business of the standards development 

organization is: The Association of 

Public-Safety Communications Officials 

International, Daytona Beach, FL. The 

nature and scope of APCO’s standards 

development activities are: Public safety 

communications, including, but not 

limited to: training and professional 

development, professional 

qualifications, education, performance 

programs, technology, systems, 

operations, and other related issues. 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. E9–16781 Filed 7–15–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Comment Request for Proposed 

Information Collection for Employment 

and Training Administration Financial 

Report Form #9130 (OMB Control No. 

1205–0461), Extension Without Change 

AGENCY: Employment and Training 

Administration. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as 

part of its continuing effort to reduce 

paperwork and respondent burden 

conducts a preclearance consultation 

program to provide the general public 

and Federal agencies with an 

opportunity to comment on proposed 

and/or continuing collections of 

information in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This 

program helps to ensure that requested 

data can be provided in the desired 

format, reporting burden (time and 

financial resources) is minimized, 

collection instruments are clearly 

understood, and the impact of collection 

requirements on respondents can be 

properly assessed. Currently, the 

Employment and Training 

Administration is soliciting comments 

concerning the collection of data for 

quarterly financial reporting on 

federally funded programs, on Form 

ETA–9130 (currently due to expire 

November 30, 2009). 

A copy of the proposed information 

collection request (ICR) can be obtained 

by contacting the office listed below in 

the addressee section of this notice or by 

accessing: http://www.doleta.gov/ 

OMBCN/OMBControlNumber.cfm. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

submitted to the office listed in the 

addressee’s section below on or before 

September 14, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments 

to Judi Fisher, Room N–4716, 

Employment and Training 

Administration, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. 

Telephone number: 202–693–3024 (this 

is not a toll-free number). Fax: 202–693– 

3362. E-mail: fisher.judi@dol.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Financial 

reporting requirements for Federal 

programs are prescribed in OMB 

Circulars A–102 and A–110. U.S. DOL 

has codified these requirements at 29 

CFR 95.52 and 29 CFR 97.41, which 

specify that forms approved by OMB are 

authorized for obtaining financial 

information from recipients. 

Pursuant to Public Law 106–107, 

OMB is streamlining Federal financial 

reporting. Inclusion of Federal Cash 

data in quarterly financial reporting is a 

significant modification that has been 

added to the expenditure information 

contained in ETA Form 9130. 

Further, ETA programs have varied 

administrative cost limitation 

requirements as specified in program 

statutes, regulations, and/or individual 

grant agreements. A line item for Total 

Administrative Expenditures provides a 

mechanism for assessing compliance 

with these requirements. 

ETA has utilized the data collected to 

assess the effectiveness of ETA 

programs and to monitor and analyze 

the financial activity of its grantees. 

Grantees are provided with predesigned software to reflect the 

requirements of ETA Form 9130 so that 

the required data will be reported 

electronically. 

This data collection format permits 

ETA to evaluate program effectiveness 

and to monitor and analyze financial 

activity, while complying with OMB 

efforts to streamline Federal financial 

reporting. 

I. Review Focus 

The Department of Labor is 

particularly interested in comments 

which: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES