alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.2



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

I, Shmuel Arvatz, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Clicksoftware
     Technologies Ltd. (the "Company");

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
     of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
     defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company
     and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
          in which this report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
          end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
          and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
          covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
     most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
          or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
          internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  April 10, 2007



/s/ Shmuel Arvatz
Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 22, 2019

No. 04-19-00467-CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

Appellant

v.

Pedro J. ARCINIEGA,

Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-10713

Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In response to the City’s July 19, 2019 motion, we suspended the appellate timetable until 

August 19, 2019, to give the trial court time to file any findings of fact and conclusions of law. 

To date, no findings or conclusions have been filed. 

We REINSTATE the appellate timetable. Appellant’s brief is due on September 9, 2019.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of August, 2019.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5051

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Ignacio, Colorado, as the ‘‘Leonard C. Burch al Service located at 1001 Williams Street in

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5051

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 1001 Williams Street in Ignacio, Colorado,

as the ‘‘Leonard C. Burch Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5051 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 1001 Williams Street in Ignacio, Colorado, shall

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘Leonard C. Burch Post

5 Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Leonard C. Burch Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 6,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 10.25

Sonus Networks, Inc.

---

250 Apollo Drive, Chelmsford, MA 01824

July 6,
2004

Steve
Edwards

Dear
Steve:

I
am pleased to provide you with the terms and conditions of our offer of employment to you by Sonus Networks, Inc. (the "Company").

As
a full-time employee of the Company, you will be expected to devote your full business time and energies to the business and affairs of the Company.

Acquisition
means any (i) merger or consolidation which results in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto representing immediately thereafter less than a
majority of the combined, voting securities of the Company or Acquirer outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, (ii) sale of all or substantially all of the assets or
operating businesses of the Company or (iii) sale of outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company, in a single transaction or series of related transactions, representing at least 70% of
the voting power of the voting securities of the Company.

---





The
Company retains the right to change, add or cease any particular benefit.

You
may accept this offer of employment and the terms and conditions thereof by confirming your acceptance in writing by July 9, 2004. Please send your letter to the company, or via
e-mail bnotini@sonusnet.com which execution will evidence your agreement with the terms and conditions set forth herein and therein. We are enthusiastic about you joining us, and believe
that our technical and business goals will provide every opportunity for you to achieve your personal and professional objectives.

Steve,
on a more personal note, Hassan and I are looking forward to your joining the team to help us take Sonus to the next level.

Very
truly yours,

/s/
Bert Notini
Bert Notini
President and COO

Accepted
by:

|/s/ Steven Edwards
Steven Edwards |  | July 8, 2004
Date |  | 
|--------------------------------- |  | ----------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
Expenditures on Children 

B F ili By

Families

Publishedannually since 1960 since 1960
Uses of Report Uses of Report

 Educational Child support guidelines Foster care payments Oth

e

r
Age of

child Total Housing Food

Transpor‐

tation Clothing

Health

care

Ch

ed

Income: Less than $56,670 (Average = $36,250)0 ‐ 23 ‐ 56 ‐ 89  ‐ 1112 ‐ 1415 ‐ 17TotalIncome: $56,670 to $98,120 (Average = $76,250)Income: More than $98 20 ,1 (Average = $ 0) 171,710)
Consumer Expenditure Surv

Consumer Expenditure Surv

 2005-06 survey Quarterl

y data, annualize

d

 15,150 households with children 

(weighted data)

 Expenditures updated each year wi

Consumer Price Index
E dit D t Expenditure 

D

a

t

a

 Child-specific—clothing, child c

and education and education

 Household level

—housing, food

trans

p, , ortation

, health care

,* and 

miscellaneous goods

*Other studies show family member shares.
To Determine Family Memb

Food d lh h d an

d Hea

l

t

h Care S

hare

 2008 USDA Food Plans 2005 Medical Expenditure 2005 Medical Expenditure

Panel Survey
To Determine 

H i E dit Housing Expenditures

 Allocated to a child based on 

housing expenses associated whousing expenses associated wan additional bedroom in a ho

 Includes additional costs due t

utilities and furniture utilities and furniture
To Determine Transportation a

Mi ll E di Miscellaneous 

Expenditures

 Only examine family-related 

t t ti hi h t f transpor

t

ation, whi

c

h accoun

ts 

f

59% of total transportation 

(2001 National Household Travel Su

 P C it M th d Per 

Capita 

M

eth

o

d
2009 Annual Expenditures on a C

bI L l y 

Income 

Leve

l

Lower group $8,330 - $9,450( ) < $56,670

)

Middle 

g p rou

p $11,650 - $13,530

($56,670-$98,120)Higher group $19,380 - $23,180 ( ) > $98,120

)
2009 Expenditures on a Child, by 

(Middl

e-i F ili ) income 

Families

)
2009 Expenditures on a Child up to Age 

by Bud

getar

y Component Component

15%

(Those with expense) 33%

17%

10%

12%

8%

5%
2009 Expenditures on a Child

b R i by 

Reg

ion

$$$$ Urban Northeast$$$ Urban West $$ Urban Midwest$ Urban South/Rural A

Urban South/Rural A
ConcernsConcerns

 Annualizing quarterly data versus lin

data

 Food and health care expenditures lo

than similar expenditures in other da

 Adequacy of state-level data
Recommendations

 M i t i hild M

a

i

n

t

a

in child-specifi dit d t ific expenditure 

d

a

ta 

(clothing, child care, and education)

 Add more chil

d-specific expenditure dat

(health care, miscellaneous items)

 Examine expenditures on children made 

non-household members

 Ask parents percent of housing expendit

g g oin

g to children
906 A.2d 439

#### IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM T. YADLON.

September 20, 2006.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-074, concluding that WILLIAM T. YADLON of EAST BRUNSWICK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be reprimanded for violating *RPC*1.15(a)(failure to safeguard client funds), *RPC*1.15(d)(failure to comply with the provisions of *Rule*1:21-6) (recordkeeping) and *Rule*1:21-6(c)(1)(H)(failure to reconcile trust accounts on a monthly basis);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that respondent should be required to submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics monthly reconciliations of his attorney accounts for a period of one year, and thereafter be required to submit quarterly reconciliations of his attorney accounts for an additional period of one year;

And the Court having determined from its review of the record that an admonition is the appropriate discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM T. YADLON is hereby admonished; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics monthly reconciliations of his attorney accounts for a period of one year and thereafter shall submit quarterly reconciliations of his attorney accounts for an additional period of one year and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

*276ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CHAMBERS OF

ESTHER SALAS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MARTIN LUTHER KING COURTHOUSE

50 WALNUT ST.

ROOM 2037

NEWARK, NJ 07101

973-297-4887

February 14, 2011

LETTER ORDER

Re: Simone v. Revelations Consulting, et al.

Civil Action No. 10-4022 (PGS) 

Dear Counsel:

The Undersigned has scheduled a telephone conference for May 2, 2011 at 11:00 A.M.

Defense counsel shall initiate the conference call. Please mark your calendars accordingly and

should you have any questions, please call chambers at (973) 297-4887.

SO ORDERED.

s/Esther Salas 

Esther Salas, U.S.M.J

Case 2:10-cv-04022-PGS -ES Document 14 Filed 02/14/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 42
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 126 (Thursday, July 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31744-31745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1841-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]


Kentucky; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-1841-DR), dated May 29, 2009, 
and related determinations.

[[Page 31745]]


DATES: Effective Date: June 25, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Kentucky is hereby amended to include the 
following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of May 29, 2009.

    Estill and Fulton Counties for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-15677 Filed 7-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Case 2:10-cv-06482-SDW -MCA Document 6-1 Filed 03/10/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 58
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 32 Filed 11/11/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 556
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 32 Filed 11/11/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 557
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4998

To make funds available to pay the United States prisoners of war that 

brought suit against the Government of Iraq in the case of Acree v. 

Republic of Iraq. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2004

Mr. STRICKLAND introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

A BILL

To make funds available to pay the United States prisoners 

of war that brought suit against the Government of 

Iraq in the case of Acree v. Republic of Iraq.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENTS TO UNITED STATES PRISONERS OF 

4 WAR BASED ON COURT JUDGMENT. 

5 (a) PAYMENTS.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall 

6 pay, out of funds described in subsection (b), $1,000,000 

7 to each of the 17 plaintiffs in the case of Acree v. Republic 

8 of Iraq, 271 F.Supp. 2d 179 (D.D.C. 2003) that were held 

9 captive by Iraq during the first Gulf War. 
2

•HR 4998 IH 

1 (b) SOURCE OF FUNDS.—$17,000,000 shall be avail2 able, from unobligated funds appropriated under chapter 

3 2 of title II of the Emergency Supplemental Appropria4 tions Act for Defense and for the Reconstruction of Iraq 

5 and Afghanistan, 2004, under the heading ‘‘OTHER BI6 LATERAL ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE—FUNDS AP7 PROPRIATED TO THE PRESIDENT—IRAQ RELIEF AND RE8 CONSTRUCTION FUND’’, for payments under subsection 

9 (a).

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rory Dolan, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 891]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 22, 2003 *(People v Dolan,*2 AD3d 745 [2003]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered April 20, 1995.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Florio, J.E, Miller, Krausman and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Case 3:11-mj-02515-DEA   Document 9   Filed 06/23/11   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 16

Case 3:11-mj-02515-DEA   Document 9   Filed 06/23/11   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 17
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1180 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1180

   To extend the full Federal medical assistance percentage to urban 
                         Indian organizations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 11, 2019

 Mr. Udall (for himself, Ms. Baldwin, Ms. Cantwell, Ms. Cortez Masto, 
Mr. Heinrich, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Markey, Mr. Merkley, Mrs. Murray, Ms. 
Smith, Mr. Tester, and Ms. Warren) introduced the following bill; which 
        was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the full Federal medical assistance percentage to urban 
                         Indian organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Urban Indian Health Parity Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF FULL FEDERAL MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PERCENTAGE TO 
              URBAN INDIAN ORGANIZATIONS.

    Section 1905(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(b)) is 
amended by striking ``Indian Health Care Improvement Act)'' and 
inserting ``Indian Health Care Improvement Act) or through an Urban 
Indian organization (as defined in section 4 of the Indian Health Care 
Improvement Act) pursuant to a grant or contract with the Indian Health 
Service under title V of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act''.
                                 <all>
```
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re the Commitment of Daniel Allen Metcalf

No. 06

- 19

- 00043

- CV Appeal from the 5th District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 17C1549

- 005 ). Opinion delivered by Jus tice Stevens and Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Carter

, * participating. *Justice Carter, Retired, Sitting by Assignment.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appell ant has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 18, 2020 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EX-10.v



 Exhibit 10(v) 
 Summary of Financial Planning Program for Executive Officers 
 The Company
provides a financial planning program for executive officers under which each may engage a third party to provide financial planning services and receive reimbursement from the Company of up to twenty-thousand dollars ($20,000) annually. Key aspects
of the program include individual financial and benefits counseling and income tax preparation, with services to extend for up to one year following retirement, termination without cause, disability or death.
905 A.2d 872

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CARL R. SUYDAM, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

August 4, 2006.

ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted on the issue of defendant’s sentence, and the matter is summarily remanded to the trial court for resentencing in light of the Court’s decision in *State v. Pierce,*188 *N.J.*155, 902 A.2d 1195 (2006).
WEC 12.31.2012 Ex 10.21






Exhibit 10.21






August 15, 2011


Mr. Patrick Keyes
[            ]
[            ]


		
	Re:
	Your Employment Offer Letter Dated December 20, 2010 (the “Employment Letter”)




Dear Pat,


This letter modifies the terms of your Employment Letter as they relate to your Supplemental Pension Benefit.  Specifically, as you know, you are eligible to participate in the Wisconsin Energy Corporation Supplemental Pension Plan (the SPP), which provides for a supplemental pension benefit that recognizes compensation in excess of IRS limits that apply to the Company's Retirement Account Plan (the RAP).  This supplemental pension benefit is subject to all the terms of the SPP and will be paid to you in accordance with the SPP.  The additional supplemental pension benefit set forth in your Employment Letter will also be paid to you in accordance with the SPP.  
As a result, the paragraph in your Employment Letter titled “Supplemental Pension Benefit,” is modified to read as follows.
“The company will establish a notional account to provide supplemental pension benefits.  The account will be credited with $100,000 at the time you commence employment and will vest upon attainment of age 60 or completion of 10 years of service, whichever comes first.  The account will be credited with interest annually at the same rate that applied to balances in the qualified pension plan.  The timing and form of payment of this benefit will be pursuant to the terms of the Wisconsin Energy Corporation Supplemental Pension Plan, as may be amended from time to time.”
All other terms and provisions of your Employment Letter remain in effect, subject to the Company's (or authorized delegate's) right, in its discretion, to change or terminate all current benefit plans or practices and other policies and procedures.  
Please acknowledge your acceptance of the foregoing by signing this letter and returning it to me by August 31, 2011.  An additional copy of this letter is enclosed for your records.  









Once signed by both parties, it wills serve as a binding agreement between us and supersedes the applicable provision of your Employment Letter.  If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Lisa George at [    ].
	
		
	Sincerely,
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ Frederick D. Kuester
	 

	 
	 

	Executive Vice President & Chief, Financial
	 

	Officer (WEC/WE/WG)
	Executive

	 
	 

	 
	/s/ J. Patrick Keyes

	 
	Date: August 15, 2011