alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of MCA Holdings Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, I, Wai Leung Cheng, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  September 28, 2009 MCA HOLDINGS CORPORATION By:/s/ Wai Leung Cheng  Wai Leung Cheng  {A0054823.DOC}  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of MCA Holdings Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, I, Michael Yu-Lung Wong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  September 28, 2009 MCA HOLDINGS CORPORATION By:/s/ Michael Yu-Lung Wong  Michael Yu-Lung Wong    {A0054823.DOC}
Case 1:97-cv-05127-RBK-JS Document 1020 Filed 08/05/08 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 7912
Case 1:97-cv-05127-RBK-JS Document 1020 Filed 08/05/08 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 7913
Case 3:10-cv-03926-AET -DEA Document 1 Filed 08/03/10 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 1
Case 3:10-cv-03926-AET -DEA Document 1 Filed 08/03/10 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 2
Case 3:10-cv-03926-AET -DEA Document 1 Filed 08/03/10 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 3
Case 3:10-cv-03926-AET -DEA Document 1 Filed 08/03/10 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 4
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




                       Consent of Independent Accountants


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements listed below of Jason Incorporated of our report dated January
29, 1999 appearing on page 40 of this Form 10-K.

          1. Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-18791)

          2. Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-30688)

          3. Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 33-31473)




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 17, 1999
mCASI – survey for mobile devices

Obinna Kalu

BLS Data Capture

Technology Forum, March 18, 2010
Goals of the Project

Research feasibility of implementing 

questionnaires for handheld devices

Identify and evaluate possible 

technologies and device platforms

Develop a sample mobile CASI 

application

Propose an integrated, enterprise 

survey solution (mobile, web, CAPI)
Device options

WAP-based/Thin-client implementation

Google Android

Apple iPhone

Windows Mobile

RIM Blackberry

Popular device; Java-based (J2ME-compliant)

Can leverage NORC’s existing Verizon network 

plan and devices for testing
mCASI 1.0 (rel Dec 2008)

http://testportal5.norc.org/test_mcasi/m/mcasi.jad
• mCASI Features and possible use:

– Data collection system on Blackberry device

– Communicates with eSurvey Server (to spawn 

cases for Web or CAPI surveys)

– Can be used by Respondent or Field interviewer 

(e.g. Screening)
Integrated Solution Architecture

eSurvey client

mCASI
End-to-End Demo

• Mobile Survey (m.eSurvey)

– Send survey to respondent’s Blackberry

– The respondent will be asked for:

• The name and e-mail address of someone they’d like to 

take a Web Survey.

• The name and physical address for someone they’d like 

to be visited for an in-person CAPI interview.

• Web Survey (Web eSurvey)

– Email message sent to respondent with URL and credentials 

for accessing the Web Survey.

• CAPI Survey (future integration)

– CAPI case is generated and loaded onto laptop of Field 

Interviewer.
Sequence of Events

1. Register User’s Blackberry with Server

2. Send Quex to Blackberry

3. Send Response to Server

4. Evaluate results

5. Create case(s) for SAQ Web Surveys

6. Create case(s) for CAPI Survey
CAPI client eSurvey

Survey Process Flow

m.eSurvey

We would like to gather future Mobile 

Application and GPS enhancements from 

two people whose opinions you value.

Please tell us the name of one person we 

can contact via e-mail.

Please give us their primary e-mail 

address so that we can send them the 

link to the Web Survey.

Now please tell the name of another 

person we can personally visit for an inperson interview

Where can we find this person for their inperson interview?

A

B

C

D

Submit

Valid 

Values

?

Create case for 

Web Survey

Valid 

Values

?

Create case for 

CAPI Survey

Web eSurvey

https://eSurvey.norc.org/

You have been identified as someone 

who would have valuable input for 

future enhancements for NORC’s 

Mobile and GPS offerings.

If a mobile application was readily 

available, how would you put it to use 

in your projects?

If we told you that we can collect the 

GPS location where a selfadministered questionnaire was 

completed, how could it be used in 

your research projects?

Thank you. Submit

E

F
mCASI Demo

http://testportal5.norc.org/test_mcasi/m/mcasi.jad
Q & A

Questions, Comments, Suggestions

Email: kalu-obinna@norc.org

Presented to: AppDev Team on Tue 

3/17/2009
Presented to: AppDev Team on Tue 

3/17/2009
Presented to: AppDev Team on Tue 

3/17/2009
Case 2:11-cv-01921-DMC -JAD Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1
Case 2:11-cv-01921-DMC -JAD Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 2 of 16 PageID: 2
Case 2:11-cv-01921-DMC -JAD Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 3 of 16 PageID: 3
Case 2:11-cv-01921-DMC -JAD Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 4 of 16 PageID: 4
Case 2:11-cv-01921-DMC -JAD Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 5 of 16 PageID: 5
Case 2:11-cv-01921-DMC -JAD Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 6 of 16 PageID: 6
Case 2:11-cv-01921-DMC -JAD Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 7 of 16 PageID: 7
Case 2:11-cv-01921-DMC -JAD Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 8 of 16 PageID: 8
Case 2:11-cv-01921-DMC -JAD Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 9 of 16 PageID: 9
Case 2:11-cv-01921-DMC -JAD Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 10 of 16 PageID: 10
Case 2:11-cv-01921-DMC -JAD Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 11 of 16 PageID: 11
Case 2:11-cv-01921-DMC -JAD Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 12 of 16 PageID: 12
Case 2:11-cv-01921-DMC -JAD Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 13 of 16 PageID: 13
Case 2:11-cv-01921-DMC -JAD Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 14 of 16 PageID: 14
Case 2:11-cv-01921-DMC -JAD Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 15 of 16 PageID: 15
Case 2:11-cv-01921-DMC -JAD Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 16 of 16 PageID: 16
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6159

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ELI WRIGHT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-96-104, CA-98-2809-7) Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 31, 1999 Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eli Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Eli Wright seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Wright , Nos. CR-96-104; CA-98- 2809-7 (Dec. 8, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 132 (Monday, July 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16513]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

Order No. 1627


Grant of Authority For Subzone Status, Black & Decker Corporation 
(Power Tools, Lawn and Garden Tools and Home Products Warehousing and 
Distribution), Jackson, Tennessee

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for `` . . . the 
establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of 
entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved, and when the activity results 
in a significant public benefit and is in the public interest;
    Whereas, the City of Memphis, Tennessee, grantee of FTZ 77, has 
made application to the Board for authority to establish special-
purpose subzone status at the power tools/lawn and garden tools and 
home products warehousing and distribution facilities of Black & Decker 
Corporation, located in Jackson, Tennessee (FTZ Docket 44-2008, filed 
8/5/2008);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (73 FR 47585, 8/14/2008); and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the 
application is in the public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby grants authority for subzone 
status for activity related to power tools/lawn and garden tools and 
home products warehousing and distribution at the Black & Decker 
Corporation facility located in Jackson, Tennessee (Subzone 77D), as 
described in the application and Federal Register notice, and subject 
to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.
    Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of June 2009.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commercefor Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board
    Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-16513 Filed 7-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
Exhibit 23.1 

 

**Consent of Independent Auditors**

 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders 

Sonic Innovations, Inc.: 

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-104239, 333-36562, 333-59988, 333-76250, 333-98303 and 333-99035) on Forms S-8 of Sonic Innovations, Inc. of our reports dated January 24, 2004, with respect to the consolidatedbalance sheets of Sonic Innovations, Inc. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related2003 and 2002 information included in the consolidated financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of Sonic Innovations, Inc. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Salt Lake City, Utah 

March 15, 2004
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Johnny Bryan Hernandez, * From the 244th District Court

of Ector County,

Trial Court No. C-20-0425-CR.

Vs. No. 11-21-00290-CR * October 3, 2024

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J. 

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgments below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgments of the trial court are in all things affirmed.
1

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

__________________________________________

:

LISA WOLMAN, :

:

Plaintiff, : Civil Action No. 11-1623 (SDW)

:

v. :

: ORDER

PETRO TECHNIK, INC.; et al., :

:

Defendants. : October 26, 2011

:

__________________________________________:

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United 

States Magistrate Judge Madeline Cox Arleo (“Magistrate Judge Arleo”), filed on September 16, 

2011. In the R&R, Magistrate Judge Arleo incorporates the reasons set forth on the record in the 

September 12, 2011 oral argument before her Honor. No objections to the R&R have been filed. 

The Court has reviewed the R&R and the other documents on file in this matter. Based on 

the foregoing, and for good cause shown,

It is hereby ORDERED that the R&R of Magistrate Judge Arleo, filed September 16, 2011,

incorporating the reasons set forth on the record on September 12, 2011, is ADOPTED as the 

conclusions of law of this Court.

Case 2:11-cv-01623-SDW -MCA Document 34 Filed 10/26/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 425
2

It is ORDERED that plaintiff Lisa Wolman’s motion to remand this action to the Superior 

Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County (Docket Entry 17), is DENIED; 

SO ORDERED.

s/Susan D. Wigenton, U.S.D.J.

Orig: Clerk

cc: Judge Arleo

 Parties

Case 2:11-cv-01623-SDW -MCA Document 34 Filed 10/26/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 426
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

JENNIFER KASILAG, et al.,

Plaintiffs, Civil No. 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW

v.

HARTFORD INVESTMENT 

FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC,

Defendant.

JENNIFER KASILAG, et al., 

Plaintiffs, Civil No. 1:14-cv-01611-RMB-KMW

v.

HARTFORD FUNDS MANAGEMENT 

COMPANY, LLC,

Defendant.

JENNIFER KASILAG, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

HARTFORD FUNDS MANAGEMENT 

COMPANY, LLC,

Defendant.

Civil No. 1:15-cv-01876-RMB-KMW

NOTICE OF MOTION DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

(1) STRIKE PLAINTIFFS’ DEMANDS FOR A JURY TRIAL,

AND (2) PRECLUDE PLAINTIFFS FROM OFFERING EVIDENCE 

AT TRIAL OF “LOST INVESTMENT EARNINGS”

Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW Document 192 Filed 05/04/16 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 9861
TO: Robert L. Lakind, Esq. 

SZAFERMAN, LAKIND, BLUMSTEIN & BLADER, P.C.

101 Grovers Mill Road, Suite 200

Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648

Andrew W. Robertson, Esq.

ZWERLING, SCHACHTER & ZWERLING, LLP

41 Madison Avenue

New York, New York 10010

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on June 6, 2016 at 9:00 AM, or as soon 

thereafter as counsel may be heard, the undersigned attorneys for Defendants, 

Hartford Investment Financial services, LLC and Hartford Funds Management 

Company, LLC shall move before the United States District Court for the District 

of New Jersey, Mitchell H. Cohen Courthouse, 4th & Cooper Streets, Camden, NJ 

08101 for an Order granting Defendants’ Motion to (1) Strike Plaintiffs’ Demands 

for a Jury Trial, and (2) Preclude Plaintiffs from Offering Evidence at Trial of 

“Lost Investment Earnings.”

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that in support of its motion, 

Defendants shall rely upon the accompanying Memorandum of Law in support of 

the motion. A Proposed Order is also enclosed; and 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that oral argument is requested in 

the event the motion is opposed.

Dated: May 4, 2016

MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY 

& MCCLOY LLP

Sean M. Murphy (pro hac vice)

Robert C. Hora (pro hac vice)

28 Liberty Street

New York, NY 10005-1413

(212) 530-5000

Of Counsel

SHERMAN WELLS SYLVESTER 

& STAMELMAN LLP

By: /s/ Anthony Sylvester 

Anthony Sylvester

210 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor

Florham Park, NJ 07932

(973) 302-9700

Attorneys for Defendants 

Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW Document 192 Filed 05/04/16 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 9862
- 2 -

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 4, 2016, a copy of the Notice of Motion and 

supporting papers were served via ECF upon all counsel of record. 

By: /s/Anthony J. Sylvester 

 Anthony J. Sylvester

Dated: May 4, 2016

Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW Document 192 Filed 05/04/16 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 9863
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Coastal Media Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jan
Aaron Sigurgeirson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopteD pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of May, 2006.


/s/ Jan Aaron Sigurgeirson
---------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
EX-10.22



 Exhibit 10.22 
 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE 
 INTERFACE, INC. NONQUALIFIED SAVINGS PLAN II

 (as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009) 

THIS AMENDMENT to the Interface, Inc. Nonqualified Savings Plan II (the “Plan”) is made on the date written below by the
Administrative Committee of the Plan (the “Administrative Committee”). 
 W I T N E S S E T H : 

WHEREAS, Interface, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Plan for the benefit of its eligible key management and highly
compensated employees; and 
 WHEREAS, Section 9.1 of the Plan provides that the Administrative Committee has the
right to amend the Plan at any time; and 
 WHEREAS, the Administrative Committee desires to amend the Plan to fully vest
those participants who remain employed by Bentley Prince Street Holdings, Inc. immediately following its purchase of Bentley Prince Street, Inc. from Interface Americas Holdings, LLC (the Affected Participants”); and 

WHEREAS, the Administrative Committee desires to amend the Plan to terminate and liquidate the Plan with respect to the Affected
Participants in accordance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(j)(4)(ix)(B); 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of the date of the sale of Bentley Prince Street, Inc. by Interface Americas Holdings, LLC to Bentley Prince Street Holdings,
Inc.: 
  

	1.	The Account of each Affected Participants is 100 percent vested. 

  

	2.	In accordance with Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(j)(4)(ix)(B), the Plan is terminated with respect to the Accounts of all Affected Participants.


  

	3.	In accordance with Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(j)(4)(ix)(B), all Accounts of all Affected Participants will be distributed to such Affected Participants
within 12 months following the effective date of this Amendment. 

  

	4.	Except as specified herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Administrative Committee has caused the following duly authorized member of the Administrative Committee to execute this Amendment on the date written below. 

 

					
		 		 	ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
			
	            8/9/12	 		 	/s/ Raymond S. Willoch
	Date
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 21 Filed 07/19/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 308
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4970

To amend title 49, United States Code, to repeal the security screening 

opt-out program for airport operators. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2004

Mrs. MALONEY (for herself, Mr. HOLT, Mr. MCDERMOTT, and Mr. OWENS) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to repeal the security 

screening opt-out program for airport operators.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Passenger Security Act 

5 of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SECURITY SCREENING OPT-OUT PROGRAM. 

7 Section 44920 of title 49, United States Code, and 

8 the item relating to such section in the analysis for chap9 ter 449 of such title, are repealed.

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1676]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon written request, copies available from: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 
20549-0213.

Extension: Form SE, OMB Control No. 3235-0327, SEC File No. 270-289.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of 
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this 
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and 
Budget for extension and approval.
    Form SE (17 CFR 239.64) is used by registrants to file paper copies 
of exhibits that would be difficult or impossible to submit 
electronically. The information contained in Form SE is used by the 
Commission to identify paper copies of exhibits. Form SE is filed by 
individuals, companies or other for-profit organizations that are 
required to file electronically. Approximately 782 registrants file 
Form SE and it takes an estimated .10 hours per response for a total 
annual burden of 78 hours.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether these proposed 
collections of information are necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; 
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will 
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 
days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Charles Boucher, Director/
CIO, C/O Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, 
Virginia 22312; or send an e-mail to: [email protected].

    Dated: January 14, 2009.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-1676 Filed 1-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```