Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# AGENCY:

Consumer Product Safety Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC or Commission) requests comments on a proposed request for an extension of approval of a collection of information from manufacturers and importers of walk-behind power lawn mowers. This collection of information consists of testing and recordkeeping requirements in certification regulations implementing the Safety Standard for Walk-Behind Power Lawn Mowers (16 CFR Part 1205). The Commission will consider all comments received in response to this notice before requesting an extension of approval of this collection of information from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

# DATES:

The Office of the Secretary must receive written comments not later than September 11, 2009.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Written comments should be captioned “Walk-Behind Power Lawn Mowers” and sent by e-mail to                         *cpsc-os@cpsc.gov.*                         Written comments may also be sent to the Office of the Secretary by facsimile at (301) 504-0127, or by mail to the Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 502, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For information about the proposed collection of information call or write Linda Glatz, Division of Policy and Planning, Office of Information Technology and Technology Services, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone: (301) 504-7671 or by e-mail to                         *lglatz@cpsc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In 1979, the Commission issued the Safety Standard for Walk-Behind Power Lawn Mowers (16 CFR Part 1205) under provisions of the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA) (15 U.S.C. 2051*et seq.*) to eliminate or reduce risks of amputations, avulsions, lacerations, and other serious injuries which have resulted from the accidental contact of some part of an operator's body with the rotating blade of a power lawn mower. The standard contains performance and labeling requirements for walk-behind power lawn mowers to address risks of blade-contact injuries.                

## A. Certification Requirements

Section 14(a) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2063(a)) requires manufacturers, importers, and private labelers of a consumer product subject to a consumer product safety standard under the CPSA or similar rule, ban, standard, or regulation under any other act enforced by the Commission to issue a certificate stating that the product complies with all applicable rules, bans, standards or regulations. Section 14(a) of the CPSA also requires that the certificate of compliance must be based on a test of each product or upon a reasonable testing program and specify each such rule, ban, standard or regulation applicable to the product.

Section 14(b) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2063(b)) authorizes the Commission to issue regulations to prescribe a reasonable testing program to support certificates of compliance with a consumer product safety standard under the CPSA or similar rule, ban, standard, or regulation under any other act enforced by the Commission. Section 16(b) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2065(b)) authorizes the Commission to issue rules to require that firms “establish and maintain” records to permit the Commission to determine compliance with rules issued under the authority of the CPSA.

The Commission has issued regulations prescribing requirements for a reasonable testing program to support certificates of compliance with the standard for walk-behind power mowers under the CPSA. These regulations also require manufacturers, importers, and private labelers of walk-behind power mowers to establish and maintain records to demonstrate compliance with the requirements for testing to support certification of compliance. 16 CFR Part 1205, Subpart B.

The Commission uses the information compiled and maintained by manufacturers and importers of walk-behind power mowers to protect consumers from risks of injuries associated with walk-behind power lawn mowers. More specifically, the Commission uses this information to determine whether the mowers produced and imported comply with the applicable standard. The Commission also uses this information to obtain corrective actions if walk-behind power mowers fail to comply with the standard in a manner which creates a substantial risk of injury to the public.

                    OMB approved the collection of information requirements for walk-behind mowers under control number 3041-0091. OMB's most recent extension of approval will expire on September 30, 2009. The Commission proposes to request an extension of approval for these collection of information requirements.                          ( print page 33418)    

## B. Estimated Burden

The Commission staff estimates that about 20 firms are subject to the testing and recordkeeping requirements of the certification regulations. The Commission staff estimates further that the annual testing and recordkeeping burden imposed by the regulations on each of these firms on average is approximately 390 hours if 3 hours are expended by each firm over 130 estimated seasonal production days each year. The estimated annual burden imposed by the testing and recordkeeping requirements on all manufacturers and importers of walk-behind power mowers is 7,800 hours.

In addition, the manufacturer is required to include permanent labels attached to the lawn mowers. The Commission staff estimates an additional hour per production day to collect the information and place it on the label. Accordingly an additional 130 hours per firm is added to the total burden. For the 20 firms, the estimated additional burden related to labeling is 2,600 hours. The estimated total burden hours related to testing recordkeeping and labeling is 520 hours per firm and 10,400 hours for the industry.

Annual testing and recordkeeping costs burden is estimated to be $428,064 based on 7,800 hours × 54.88 (the average hourly total compensation for U.S. management, professional, and related occupations in goods-producing industries, Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2008). Annual costs burden for labeling is estimated to be $70,564 based on 2,600 hours × $27.14 (the average hourly total compensation for sales and office workers in goods-producing industries, Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2008). The total estimated burden costs related to testing, recordkeeping, and labeling to the industry is $498,626.

The Commission staff will expend approximately one half of one staff month reviewing records required to be maintained for walk-behind power lawn mowers. The annual cost to the Federal government of the collection of information in these regulations is estimated to be $6,920.

## C. Request for Comments

The Commission solicits written comments from all interested persons about the proposed collection of information. The Commission specifically solicits information relevant to the following topics:

—Whether the collection of information described above is necessary for the proper performance of the Commission's functions, including whether the information would have practical utility;

—Whether the estimated burden of the proposed collection of information is accurate;

—Whether the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected could be enhanced; and

—Whether the burden imposed by the collection of information could be minimized by use of automated, electronic or other technological collection techniques, or other forms of information technology.

Dated: July 7, 2009.

Todd A. Stevenson, 

Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-16469 Filed 7-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P