alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 96-3011EA

_____________ Pinkey McFarlin, * * Appellant, *

* v. * * Appeal from the United States Marvin Poe, Individually and in his * District Court for the Eastern official capacity as the coordinator of * District of Arkansas. the third Judicial Drug Task Force; * David Stewart, Individually and in his * [UNPUBLISHED] official capacity as Chief of Police of * the Newport Police Department, * * Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: July 2, 1997

Filed: July 10, 1997

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Pinkey McFarlin appeals the district c ourt's adverse grant of summary judgment inMcFarlin' s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having reviewed the record and the parties ' briefs, we conclude the j udgment of the district court was correct. We thus affirm the district court without further discussion. See8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

We deny appellee David Stewart's motio n to dismiss and motion for fees, costs, and sanctions. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hostopia.com Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Colin Campbell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date: November 14, 2006 | /s/COLIN CAMPBELLColin Campbell Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------

49

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 10.40

 

Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd.
 2013 Annual Bonus Plan

 

Purpose

 

The purpose of this Plan is to increase the intrinsic business value of Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd. and its operating subsidiaries (the “Company”) by aligning employee performance with the interests of the Company’s owners. All active full-time employees of the Company shall be eligible to participate in the Plan.

 

Performance Targets

 

The Plan shall be tied to a calendar year performance cycle consistent with the Company’s fiscal year. Annual bonus pool targets for categories of employees and an overall Company performance target under the Plan shall be set by the Company’s Compensation and Nominating Committee (the “Committee”).  At the conclusion of the calendar year, the Committee shall judge Company performance against the bonus pool targets when determining the final size of the bonus pools and the level of payout for each employee. At lower levels of the Company employee individual performance is also considered. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer, in consultation with the Committee, shall then recommend the distribution of the pool to individual Plan participants who are non-executive officers of the Company. The Committee shall approve any payments to the Company’s executive officers.

 

Bonus Pool Targets

 

For the 2013 calendar year, the annual bonus pool targets for the Company’s officers and all remaining Company staff shall be the following percentages of eligible salaries:

 

	
Performance
    	
 
    	
Group A
    	
 
    	
Group B
    	
 
    	
Group C-G
    	
 
    
	
Minimum
    	
 
    	
0
    	
%
    	
0
    	
%
    	
0%
    	
 
    
	
On Target
    	
 
    	
100
    	
%
    	
75
    	
%
    	
10-50%
    	
 
    
	
Superior
    	
 
    	
200
    	
%
    	
150
    	
%
    	
10-90%
    	
 
    


 

Eligible salaries for all officers and staff shall be equivalent to the 2013 base salaries of Plan participants (as in effect on April 1, 2013), pro-rated in the case of any officer or staff member actively employed by the Company for less than the entire 2013 calendar year.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4945 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4945

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an incentive for 
  expanding employment in rural areas by allowing employers the work 
        opportunity credit for hiring residents of rural areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2004

  Mr. Hayes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an incentive for 
  expanding employment in rural areas by allowing employers the work 
        opportunity credit for hiring residents of rural areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Economic Development and 
Opportunities Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT TO APPLY TO NEW EMPLOYEES WHO ARE 
              RESIDENTS OF RURAL AREAS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 51(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining members of targeted groups) is amended 
by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (G), by striking the 
period at the end of subparagraph (H) and inserting ``, or'', and by 
adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(I) a rural area resident.''
    (b) Rural Area Resident.--Subsection (d) of section 51 of such Code 
is amended by redesignating paragraphs (10) through (12) as paragraphs 
(11) through (13), respectively, and by inserting after paragraph (9) 
the following new paragraph:
            ``(10) Rural area resident.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The term `rural area resident' 
                means, with respect to any period, any employee of the 
                employer if--
                            ``(i) substantially all of the services 
                        performed during such period by such employee 
                        for such employer are performed within an area 
                        determined by the Secretary of Agriculture to 
                        be a rural area, and
                            ``(ii) the principal place of abode of such 
                        employee while performing such services is 
                        within such an area.
                    ``(B) Termination.--Such term shall not include any 
                individual who begins work for the employer after the 
                date which is 5 years after the date of the enactment 
                of this paragraph.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to individuals who begin work for the employer after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered June 6, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00287-CR

No. 05-12-00288-CR

TOM ALVIN SCHULZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-00500-J, F11-00343-J

ORDER

On February 21, 2013, we ordered the trial court to file a supplemental record containing 

an order modifying the conditions of community supervision setting out the amount of restitution 

as agreed by the parties. To date, we have not received the order modifying the conditions of 

community supervision.

Accordingly, we ORDER the Honorable Gracie Lewis, Presiding Judge of the Criminal 

District Court No. 3, to file a supplemental record, within FIFTEEN DAYS from the date of this 

order, that contains an order modifying the conditions of community supervision setting out the 

amount of restitution as agreed by the parties.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5042

To amend the Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 1944 to ensure 

that the dependents of employees of the Forest Service stationed in 

Puerto Rico receive a high-quality elementary and secondary education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2004

Mr. ACEVEDO-VILA ́ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL

To amend the Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 

1944 to ensure that the dependents of employees of 

the Forest Service stationed in Puerto Rico receive a 

high-quality elementary and secondary education.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO COVER EXPENSES OF PRIMARY 

4 AND SECONDARY SCHOOLING OF DEPEND5 ENTS OF FOREST SERVICE PERSONNEL IN 

6 PUERTO RICO. 

7 Section 202 of the Department of Agriculture Or8 ganic Act of 1944 (16 U.S.C. 554b) is amended—
2

•HR 5042 IH 

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) PROVISION OF MEDICAL

2 CARE; RELATED TRANSPORTATION.—’’ before ‘‘Ap3 propriations for the Forest Service’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub5 section: 

6 ‘‘(b) COVERAGE OF DEPENDENT EDUCATIONAL EX7 PENSES IN PUERTO RICO; RELATED TRANSPORTATION.—

8 (1) Appropriations for the Forest Service shall be available 

9 to the Secretary of Agriculture to cover the cost of pri10 mary and secondary schooling of dependents of Forest 

11 Service personnel, who are stationed in Puerto Rico and 

12 are subject to transfer and reassignment to other locations 

13 in the United States, but not to exceed the costs author14 ized by the Department of Defense for the same area for 

15 dependents of members of the Armed Forces, when it is 

16 determined by the Secretary that the schools available in 

17 the area of Puerto Rico in which the dependents reside 

18 are unable to provide adequately for the education of the 

19 dependents. 

20 ‘‘(2) If the Secretary determines that the school at21 tended by a dependent described in paragraph (1) is not 

22 accessible by public means of transportation on a regular 

23 basis, the Secretary may provide, out of funds appro24 priated for the Forest Service, for the transportation of 
3

•HR 5042 IH 

1 the dependent between the school and the place of resi2 dence of the dependent.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey P. Wood, Chief Financial Officer of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC, the general partner of Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P.,
the general partner of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





Date: August 10, 2009
/s/ Jeffrey P. WoodJeffrey P. WoodSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Eagle RockEnergy G&P, LLC, General Partner of Eagle RockEnergy GP, L.P., General Partner of Eagle RockEnergy Partners, L.P.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 131071 & (25) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 131071 COA: 264945 Livingston CC: 00-011454-FH SANDY RUSSELL GLOVER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 23, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to re lief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

s1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
SCWC-15-0000909

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

RONALD MELVIN BARNES, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-15-0000909; FC-CR. NO. 12-1-0057)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Ronald Melvin Barnes’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on November 1, 2017, is 

hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard 

in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to 

Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for 

retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 15, 2017.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-15-0000909

15-DEC-2017

03:46 PM
**Exhibit 99.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Satyam ComputerServices Limited (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’sknowledge, that:
     (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the Company forthe year ended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.   Dated: July 26, 2004 /s/ B. Rama Raju   Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany theReport pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is notto be incorporated by reference to any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**MedPro Safety Products, Inc.****Rule 13a-14(a) Certification****of Chief Executive Officer**

I, W. Craig Turner, Chief Executive Officer of MedPro Safety Products, Inc. (the “Company”), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.

| Dated: August13, 2008 | /s/ W. Craig Turner      W. Craig Turner       Chief Executive Officer |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|

27

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the interim report of DoMark International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R.
Thomas Kidd, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

DOMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC.


By /s/ William Seery
   ------------------------------------------
   William Seery
   Chief Financial Officer
   October 17, 2011
SCWC

- 20

- 0000473

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

STATE OF HAWAI  I, Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appell ee ,

vs.

JOHNNY ETIMANI, Petitioner/Defendant

- Appell ant

.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP

- 20

- 0000473; CASE NO. 1CPC

- 17

- 0001446)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Petitio ner/Defendant

- Appellant’s Application for Writ

of Certiorari, filed on May 5, 2022, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, June 1, 2022.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-20-0000473 01-JUN-2022 09:00 AM Dkt. 3 ODAC
**Exhibit 31.2**I, Richard W. FitzGerald, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          b) (Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 34-47986);          c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:November 16, 2007              /s/ Richard W. FitzGerald   Richard W. FitzGerald   Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC,General Partner of Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P.,General Partner of Eagle Rock Energy Partners,L.P.
Case 2:11-cv-01095-SDW-MCA Document 39 Filed 06/15/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 452
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 1 of 32 PageID: 273
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 2 of 32 PageID: 274
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 3 of 32 PageID: 275
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 4 of 32 PageID: 276
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 5 of 32 PageID: 277
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 6 of 32 PageID: 278
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 7 of 32 PageID: 279
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 8 of 32 PageID: 280
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 9 of 32 PageID: 281
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 10 of 32 PageID: 282
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 11 of 32 PageID: 283
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 12 of 32 PageID: 284
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 13 of 32 PageID: 285
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 14 of 32 PageID: 286
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 15 of 32 PageID: 287
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 16 of 32 PageID: 288
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 17 of 32 PageID: 289
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 18 of 32 PageID: 290
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 19 of 32 PageID: 291
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 20 of 32 PageID: 292
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 21 of 32 PageID: 293
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 22 of 32 PageID: 294
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 23 of 32 PageID: 295
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 24 of 32 PageID: 296
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 25 of 32 PageID: 297
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 26 of 32 PageID: 298
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 27 of 32 PageID: 299
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 28 of 32 PageID: 300
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 29 of 32 PageID: 301
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 30 of 32 PageID: 302
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 31 of 32 PageID: 303
Case 3:10-cv-06344-PGS-DEA Document 14-3 Filed 05/13/11 Page 32 of 32 PageID: 304