alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ligio Lopez, Appellant.

[851 NYS2d 884]

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Dillon, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
#### SUPERIOR DIVING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff v. Jay WATTS, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Counter Claimant-Appellee v. Newton B. Schwartz, Sr., Third Party Defendant-Counter Defendant-Appellant. Jay Watts, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Newton B. Schwartz, Sr., Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant.

No. 12-30131.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 10, 2012.

Newton Boris Schwartz, Sr., Houston, TX, pro se.

Robert O. Homes, Jr., Esq., Law Office of Robert O. Homes, Gulfport, MS, for Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee.

William Everard Wright, Jr., Esq., Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, L.L.P., New Orleans, LA, for Third Party Defendant-Appellee.

*294Before BARKSDALE, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

On joint oral motion presented in open court on December 6, 2012, premised on the parties’ having settled this matter, IT IS ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.1. Costs are taxed against Appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 39(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all outstanding motions are DENIED as moot.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eugene Waymea, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 781]

To the extent any of the prosecutor’s summation remarks were improper, any error was harmless *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 237 [1975]; *People v*Almonte, 23 AD3d 392, 394 [2005]). Skelos, J.P., Fisher, Covello and Eng, JJ., concur.
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-ESK Document 166 Filed 01/22/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 5400
Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-ESK Document 166 Filed 01/22/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 5401
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

27. Unemployed persons by reason for unemployment, sex, and age

(Numbers in thousands)

Reason

Total,

16 years

and over

Men,

20 years

and over

Women,

20 years

and over

Both sexes,

16 to 19

years

1997 1998 1997 1998 1997 1998 1997 1998

NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYED

 Total unemployed .................................................................. 6,739 6,210 2,882 2,580 2,585 2,424 1,271 1,205

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs .......... 3,037 2,822 1,795 1,588 1,069 1,053 174 181

 On temporary layoff ................................................................ 931 866 567 483 304 322 60 61

 Not on temporary layoff .......................................................... 2,106 1,957 1,228 1,105 764 731 114 120

 Permanent job losers ............................................................ 1,436 1,353 833 763 541 527 63 64

 Persons who completed temporary jobs .............................. 670 603 395 343 224 204 51 56

Job leavers ............................................................................... 795 734 358 318 333 330 104 86

Reentrants ................................................................................ 2,338 2,132 675 611 1,057 944 606 577

New entrants ............................................................................ 569 520 55 63 126 97 388 361

PERCENT DISTRIBUTION

 Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs ......... 45.1 45.5 62.3 61.5 41.3 43.4 13.7 15.0

 On temporary layoff ............................................................... 13.8 13.9 19.7 18.7 11.8 13.3 4.7 5.1

 Not on temporary layoff ......................................................... 31.3 31.5 42.6 42.8 29.6 30.2 9.0 10.0

 Job leavers .............................................................................. 11.8 11.8 12.4 12.3 12.9 13.6 8.2 7.2

 Reentrants ............................................................................... 34.7 34.3 23.4 23.7 40.9 39.0 47.6 47.9

 New entrants ........................................................................... 8.4 8.4 1.9 2.4 4.9 4.0 30.5 30.0

UNEMPLOYED AS A PERCENT OF THE

 CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE

 Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs ......... 2.2 2.1 2.6 2.3 1.8 1.8 2.2 2.2

 Job leavers .............................................................................. .6 .5 .5 .5 .6 .6 1.3 1.0

 Reentrants ............................................................................... 1.7 1.5 1.0 .9 1.8 1.6 7.6 7.0

 New entrants ........................................................................... .4 .4 .1 .1 .2 .2 4.9 4.4

 NOTE: Beginning in January 1998, data reflect new composite estimation procedures and revised population controls used in the household survey.

203
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

Norman J. Hayes, Respondent, 

v. 

State of South Carolina, Petitioner. 

Appellate Case No. 2015-002294 

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI 

TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
	

Appeal from Lexington County 

Edward W. Miller, Post-Conviction Relief Judge
	

Opinion No. 27676 

Heard October 20, 2016 – Filed November 9, 2016 

CERTIORARI DIMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY 

GRANTED 

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant 

Attorney General Patrick Lowell Schmeckpeper, both of 

Columbia, for Petitioner. 

Appellate Defender Laura Ruth Baer, of Columbia, for 

Respondent. 
PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of 

Appeals decision in Hayes v. State, 413 S.C. 553, 777 S.E.2d 6 (Ct. App. 2015). 

After careful consideration of the appendices and briefs, the writ of certiorari 

is 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. 

PLEICONES, C.J., BEATTY, KITTREDGE, HEARN and FEW, JJ., 

concur.
Order entered July 29, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00798-CV

DAVID FLORES, Appellant

V.

BLANCA FLORES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-17367

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s July 23, 2015 motion seeking a two-week extension of 

time to file a brief. Appellant tendered his brief to this Court on July 27, 2015. Accordingly, we 

GRANT appellant’s motion to the extent we ORDER the brief tendered to this Court by 

appellant on July 27, 2015 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

(609) 989-0508

CHAMBERS OF Clarkson Fisher Building and

PETER G. SHERIDAN U.S. Courthouse

402 East State Street

Trenton, New Jersey 08608

TO: All Attorneys of Record

FROM: Peter G. Sheridan, U.S.D.J

DATE: June 17, 2013

RE: Braintree Laboratories v. Novel Laboratories

11-cv-1341 (PGS)

I am in receipt ofseveral proposed forms of a final order and opposition thereto. It appears that

the parties have not conferred about the form of order. Before I enter a final order, I request that the

parties confer and discuss the scope and content of the proposed final order, and submit a joint proposal.

In the event a joint proposal cannot be reached, each party may submit a one page letter with comments by

12:00 p.m. on June 18, 2013. Thank you.

Case 3:11-cv-01341-PGS-LHG Document 387 Filed 06/17/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 27599
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RELATED CASE ORDER

A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a

Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been

filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge

assigned to the earliest filed case below that bears my initials, I find that the more recently filed

case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case assigned to me, and such case(s) shall

be reassigned to me. Any cases listed below that are not related to the case assigned to me are

referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case for a related case determination.

C 10-05621 SBA Lockhart et al v. Sprint Nextel Corporation

C 10-05660 MMC Tallal v. Sprint Nextel Corporation

I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. _SBA

ORDER

Counsel are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the initials

of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management

conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the

dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly. 

Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be renoticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR

Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue

to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned

judge.

Dated:_1/10/11

Judge Saundra B. Armstrong

Case 2:11-cv-02308-SDW-MCA Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 275
-2-

 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on the date stated below, I lodged a copy of this order with each judicial

officer and I mailed a copy to each counsel of record or pro se party in the cases listed above.

 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

DATED: 1/10/11 By: 

 Deputy Clerk

Copies to: Courtroom Deputies

Case Systems Administrators

Counsel of Record

Entered into Assignment Program: (date)

Case 2:11-cv-02308-SDW-MCA Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 276
---

---

EXHIBIT 15.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-127013, 333-141654, 333-155442
and 333-155444) pertaining to the employee stock option plan of RADVISION Ltd. of our
reports dated March 17, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of RADVISION Ltd and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of RADVISION Ltd. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2008.

| |                                   
| | ----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
| | /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay and Kasierer
| | Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer      
| | A Member of Ernst & Young Global  

Tel-Aviv, IsraelMarch
25, 2009



---

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Unsolicited SARS Virus Program Project Review.                    

*Date:*                         July 30, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Clayton C. Huntley, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, Room 3124, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616. 301-451-2570.                         *chuntley@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 1, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-16097 Filed 7-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Michael O’Donnell, Respondent, v Grigore Blanaru, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 316]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), entered March 19, 2004, which, upon a jury verdict finding him 85% at fault in the happening of the accident and the plaintiff 15% at fault, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $760,200, including $42,000 for future medical expenses and $10,000 for future hospital expenses.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof awarding the plaintiff the sum of $42,000 for future medical expenses and $10,000 for future hospital expenses and substituting therefor a provision severing the plaintiff’s causes of action to recover damages for future medical and hospital expenses and granting a new trial with respect thereto; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the defendant, unless within 30 days after service upon him of a copy of this decision and order, the plaintiff shall serve and file in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Queens County, a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict as to damages for future hospital expenses from the sum of $10,000 to the sum of $0, and for future medical expenses from the sum of $42,000 to the sum of $12,600 and to the entry of an appropriate amended judgment in his favor; in the event that the plaintiff so stipulates, then the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for the entry of an appropriate amended judgment accordingly.

The jury award for future medical expenses in the sum of $42,000 is based in part on speculation, and the record supports *777an award no greater than $12,600 for that category of damages *(see Sanvenero v Cleary,*225 AD2d 755, 756 [1996]). The award of future hospital expenses is unsupported by the record. We agree, however, that the remainder of the award of damages does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation *(see*CPLR 5501 [c]).

We reject the defendant’s claim that the jury’s apportionment of fault was against the weight of the evidence *(see Evers v Carroll,*17 AD3d 629, 631 [2005]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Crane, J.E, Krausman, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 132 (Monday, July 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33450-33451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16461]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Strengthening National Capacity in Malaria and 
Other Infectious Disease Operations Research, Funding Opportunity 
Announcement (FOA) CK09-004, Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting.
    Time and Date: 2:30 p.m.-4:30 p.m., July 28, 2009 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with 
provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., 
and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services 
Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of ``Strengthening National Capacity 
in Malaria and Other Infectious Disease Operations Research, Funding 
Opportunity Announcement (FOA) CK09-004.'' This meeting was initially 
held June 1, 2009. A reviewer was unable to participate unexpectedly 
and the meeting was held in the absence of the required quorum; 
therefore, the panel will be reconvened to review the application 
received in response to the announcement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wendy Carr, PhD, CDC, 1600 Clifton 
Road, NE., Mailstop D60, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone: (404) 498-2276.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.


[[Page 33451]]


    Dated: July 7, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-16461 Filed 7-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5105

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2004

Received 

AN ACT

To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to carry out construction and related activities 

in support of the collaborative Very Energetic Radiation 

Imaging Telescope Array System (VERITAS) project on 

Kitt Peak near Tucson, Arizona.
2

HR 5105 RDS 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING BOARD OF REGENTS OF SMITH4 SONIAN INSTITUTION TO CARRY OUT CON5 STRUCTION AND RELATED ACTIVITIES IN 

6 SUPPORT OF VERITAS ASTROPHYSICAL OB7 SERVATORY PROJECT. 

8 The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution 

9 is authorized to carry out construction and related activi10 ties in support of the collaborative Very Energetic Radi11 ation Imaging Telescope Array System (VERITAS) 

12 project on Kitt Peak near Tucson, Arizona. 

13 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

14 There is authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 

15 for fiscal year 2005 to carry out section 1.

Passed the House of Representatives September 29, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
EX-10.26



 Exhibit 10.26 

 
 Executive Officer Compensation Information 

 
 The following table sets forth the annual base salaries for
2012 and 2013 for the executive officers of Seattle Genetics, Inc. (the “Company”). The table below also sets forth the bonuses awarded to the Company’s executive officers for the 2012 fiscal year under the Company’s 2012 Senior
Executive Annual Bonus Plan. The 2013 target bonuses (based on a percentage of base salary) for the Company’s executive officers under the Company’s 2013 Senior Executive Annual Bonus Plan are also set forth in the table below. 

 

																	
	 Name and Title 
	  	2012 Base Salary	 	  	2012 Bonus	 	  	2013
Base Salary	 	 	2013 Target Bonus
Percentage	 
	 Clay B. Siegall, Ph.D.

  President & Chief

  Executive Officer
	  	$	700,000	  	  	$	577,500	  	  	$	725,000	  	 	 	75	% 
	 Todd E. Simpson

  Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	371,350	  	  	$	183,818	  	  	$	399,350	  	 	 	45	% 
	 Eric L. Dobmeier

  Chief Operating Officer
	  	$	442,050	  	  	$	243,128	  	  	$	457,550	  	 	 	50	% 
	 Thomas C. Reynolds

  Former Chief Medical Officer
	  	$	432,900	  	  	$	214,286	  	  	$	432,900	(1) 	 	 	N/A	  
	 Vaughn Himes

  Executive Vice President,

  Technical Operations
	  	$	365,000	  	  	$	166,440	  	  	$	379,600	  	 	 	40	% 
	 Chris Boerner

  Senior Vice President,

  Commercial
	  	$	315,000	  	  	$	138,600	  	  	$	357,600	  	 	 	40	% 

  

	(1)	 	 Dr. Reynolds
resigned from the Company effective February 15, 2013. 









 Director Compensation Information 
  
 The following table sets forth the compensation components for non-employee members of the Company’s Board
of Directors for 2012 and 2013, including equity awards.
  

									
	 Compensation Element
	  	2012	 	  	2013	 
	 General Board Service – Cash Retainer
	  	$	40,000	  	  	$	50,000	  
	 General Board Service – Equity
	  				  			
	 Initial Grant – Number of Options
	  	 	25,000	  	  	 	12,500	  
	 Initial Grant – Number of Restricted Stock Units
	  	 	0	  	  	 	5,000	  
	 Annual Grant – Number of Shares
	  	 	17,500	  	  	 	8,750	  
	 Annual Grant – Number of Restricted Stock Units
	  	 	0	  	  	 	3,500	  
	 Chair Service – Annual Retainer
	  				  			
	 Lead Director
	  	$	12,000	  	  	$	12,000	  
	 Audit
	  	$	20,000	  	  	$	20,000	  
	 Compensation
	  	$	12,000	  	  	$	15,000	  
	 Nominating & Governance
	  	$	5,000	  	  	$	10,000	  
	 Committee Member Service – Annual Retainer
	  				  			
	 Audit
	  	$	10,000	  	  	$	10,000	  
	 Compensation
	  	$	6,000	  	  	$	8,000	  
	 Nominating & Governance
	  	$	3,000	  	  	$	5,000
EXHIBIT 21.1



|                                                         |  |                              
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Subsidiary Name                                          |  | State/Country of
Organization
|Genesys Software Systems, Inc.                           |  | Massachusetts                
|ICR Limited, L.C.                                        |  | Massachusetts                
|ICR International Limited                                |  | United Kingdom               
|Salary.com Limited (formerly known as Infobasis Limited) |  | United Kingdom               
|Salary.com Securities Corporation                        |  | Massachusetts                
|SDC China Ltd.                                           |  | China                        
|Salary.com Jamaica Limited                               |  | Jamaica