UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

DASHAND D. CHASE, :

: Civil Action No. 11-1159 (RBK)

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : MEMORANDUM OPINION

:

DETECTIVE EDWARD KUNKEL, :

et al., :

:

Defendants. :

APPEARANCES:

Plaintiff pro se

Dashand D. Chase

Atlantic County Justice Facility

5060 Atlantic Avenue

Mays Landing, NJ 08330

KUGLER, District Judge

Plaintiff Dashand D. Chase, a prisoner confined at Atlantic

County Justice Facility in Mays Landing, New Jersey, seeks to

bring this civil action in forma pauperis, without prepayment of

fees or security, asserting claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Civil actions brought in forma pauperis are governed by 28

U.S.C. § 1915. The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub. L.

No. 104-135, 110 Stat. 1321 (April 26, 1996) (the “PLRA”), which

amends 28 U.S.C. § 1915, establishes certain financial

requirements for prisoners who are attempting to bring a civil

action or file an appeal in forma pauperis.

Under the PLRA, a prisoner seeking to bring a civil action

in forma pauperis must submit an affidavit, including a statement

Case 1:11-cv-01159-RBK-AMD Document 2 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 26
of all assets, which states that the prisoner is unable to pay

the fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The prisoner also must submit

a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement(s)

for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his

complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). The prisoner must obtain

this certified statement from the appropriate official of each

prison at which he was or is confined. Id.

Even if the prisoner is granted in forma pauperis status,

the prisoner must pay the full amount of the $350 filing fee in

installments. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). In each month that the 1

amount in the prisoner’s account exceeds $10.00, until the

$350.00 filing fee is paid, the agency having custody of the

prisoner shall assess, deduct from the prisoner’s account, and

forward to the Clerk of the Court an installment payment equal to

20 % of the preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s

account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).

Plaintiff may not have known when he submitted his complaint

that he must pay the filing fee, and that even if the full filing

fee, or any part of it, has been paid, the Court must dismiss the

case if it finds that the action: (1) is frivolous or malicious;

(2) fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or

(3) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from

 Here, Plaintiff has used an out-of-date Complaint form 1

which states that the filing fee is $120. In fact, the filing

fee is now $350.

2

Case 1:11-cv-01159-RBK-AMD Document 2 Filed 03/11/11 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 27
such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (in forma pauperis

actions). See also 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (dismissal of actions in

which prisoner seeks redress from a governmental defendant); 42

U.S.C. § 1997e (dismissal of prisoner actions brought with

respect to prison conditions). If the Court dismisses the case

for any of these reasons, the PLRA does not suspend installment

payments of the filing fee or permit the prisoner to get back the

filing fee, or any part of it, that has already been paid.

If the prisoner has, on three or more prior occasions while

incarcerated, brought in federal court an action or appeal that

was dismissed on the grounds that it was frivolous or malicious,

or that it failed to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted, he cannot bring another action in forma pauperis unless

he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g).

In this action, Plaintiff failed to submit a complete in

forma pauperis application as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1),

(2), including a certified account statement. See, e.g., Tyson

v. Youth Ventures, L.L.C., 42 Fed.Appx. 221 (10th Cir. 2002);

Johnson v. United States, 79 Fed.Cl. 769 (2007). More

specifically, the institutional account statement submitted by

Plaintiff has not been certified by an appropriate prison

official.

3

Case 1:11-cv-01159-RBK-AMD Document 2 Filed 03/11/11 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 28
The allegations of the Complaint do not suggest that

Plaintiff is in imminent danger of serious physical injury.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiff’s application for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied without

prejudice and the Clerk of the Court will be ordered to

administratively terminate this action, without filing the

complaint or assessing a filing fee. Plaintiff will be granted

leave to move to re-open within 30 days.2

An appropriate Order will be entered.

s/Robert B. Kugler 

Robert B. Kugler

United States District Judge

Dated: March 10, 2011 

 Such an administrative termination is not a “dismissal” 2

for purposes of the statute of limitations, and if the case is

reopened pursuant to the terms of the accompanying Order, it is

not subject to the statute of limitations time bar if it was

originally filed timely. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266

(1988) (prisoner mailbox rule); McDowell v. Delaware State

Police, 88 F.3d 188, 191 (3d Cir. 1996); see also Williams-Guice

v. Board of Education, 45 F.3d 161, 163 (7th Cir. 1995).

4

Case 1:11-cv-01159-RBK-AMD Document 2 Filed 03/11/11 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 29