alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial data extracted from Balance Sheet,
Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto incorporated
in Part II, Item 7. of this Form 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,400
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
Rail Employer Reporting Instructions

Part VI - Reports Related to Service and Compensation 

Chapter 3: Form DC-1, Employer's Quarterly Report of Contributions Under RUIA

1

DC-1 Submissions 

Employers must submit Form DC-1, Employer's Quarterly Report of Contributions under the 

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA) and remit contributions (taxes) to the Bureau of 

Fiscal Operations (BFO) of the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB). Instructions for filing Form 

DC-1 are on the form. 

Pay.gov

Employers are encouraged to make their RUIA contributions using the Pay.gov system. 

RUIA Contribution Rates 

Each employer has an individual RUIA contribution rate that is "experience rated". That means 

that the employer's rate is based on the actual benefits paid to employees or former employees. An 

employer's RUIA contribution rate is established annually by the RRB. Notices are released to 

employers in October of each year to notify them of the contribution rate for the upcoming year. 

For example, notices that were released in October 2014 notified the employers of their 2015 

contribution rates. New employers or employers who do not know their contribution rate should 

contact:

Quality Reporting Service Center

Railroad Retirement Board 

844 North Rush Street - 7th Floor

Chicago, Illinois 60611-1275

Phone: (312) 751-4992 

Fax: (312) 751-7123 

Email: QRSC@rrb.gov

Reconcile Compensation and Taxes 

The total creditable RUIA compensation reported on Form BA-3, Annual Report of Creditable 

Compensation, in a calendar year should be consistent with the total taxable RUIA compensation 

reported on Form DC-1 for the same year. Each employer should reconcile these amounts prior to 

filing the forms. The RRB will contact an employer about any discrepancies but the employer may 

be subject to penalties and interest at that point. 

Errors, Penalties and Interest 

If you discover errors affecting Form DC-1 after the form has been submitted to the RRB, make 

the applicable adjustment on the next DC-1 you file with the RRB. If the error also affects the tax 

liability for the previous calendar year, make the adjustment in your next tax deposit payment. 

Questions about the form and the payment of contributions should be directed to:
Rail Employer Reporting Instructions

Part VI - Reports Related to Service and Compensation 

Chapter 3: Form DC-1, Employer's Quarterly Report of Contributions Under RUIA

2

Bureau of Fiscal Operations

Railroad Retirement Board 

844 North Rush Street 

Chicago, Illinois 60611-1275

Phone: (312) 751-4668 or 4593 

Email: BFO@rrb.gov

The penalty for late submission of Form DC-1 is 5 percent a month, up to a maximum of 25 

percent. 

The interest charge for delinquent remittance of contributions is 1 percent a month.
Case 2:11-cr-00184-JLL Document 1 Filed 03/12/09 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 1
Case 2:11-cr-00184-JLL Document 1 Filed 03/12/09 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 2
Case 2:11-cr-00184-JLL Document 1 Filed 03/12/09 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 3
Case 2:11-cr-00184-JLL Document 1 Filed 03/12/09 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 4
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;      and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                | MEPRO      SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. |                         |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                                |                             |                         |   |
| Dated:       November 15, 2010 | By:                         | /s/      W. Craig Turner     |   |
|                                |                             | W.      Craig Turner         |   |
|                                |                             | Chief      Executive Officer |   |

----
United States Attorney 

District of New Jersey 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

970 Broad Street, 7th floor 973-645-2700 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

U.S. Department of Justice 

October 15, 2019 

United States District Court 

Clerk’s Office 

Attn: Michael Dixon 

King Federal Building & US Courthouse 

50 Walnut Street 

Newark, NJ 07102 

 Re: United States v. Justin Birdsall 

Crim No. 11-134/10mj6135 

Dear Mr. Dixon: 

This matter has been completed with respect to defendant Justin 

Birdsall. Please cancel your Personal Recognizance Bond no. NEW3529 for 

$100,000, which was filed on November 16, 2010 and recorded in the venue of 

Newark as follows: 

Judgment No: RG-063529-0000 

Amount: $100,000.00 

 Date Entered: 11/24/10 

Date Filed: 11/16/10 

Creditor: United States of America 

Debtor: Justin Birdsall, Principal 

Donna A. Birdsall, Surety 

Steven G. Birdsall, Surety 

Any judgments or liens associated with this recognizance bond may be 

cancelled of record. Thank you for your assistance. 

Respectfully submitted, 

CRAIG CARPENITO 

United States Attorney 

s/Ronnell L. Wilson 

 By: RONNELL L. WILSON 

Co-Chief, National Security

Case 2:11-cr-00134-CCC Document 21 Filed 10/15/19 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 46
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN JOSE MARTINEZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 13-71456 

Agency No. A095-737-543 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Juan Jose Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 19 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 13-71456 

Padilla-Martinez v. Holder, 770 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny the 

petition for review.

The agency did not err in denying Martinez’s application for cancellation of 

removal, where Martinez failed to meet his burden of proof to establish that his 

convictions do not render him ineligible for relief. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(B), 

(C); see also Pereida v. Wilkinson, 141 S. Ct. 754, 760 (2021) (applicant bears the 

burden of establishing eligibility for discretionary relief, including that he has not 

been convicted of certain disqualifying offenses).

In light of this disposition, we do not reach Martinez’s contentions regarding 

the remaining factors for eligibility for cancellation of removal. See Simeonov v. 

Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (the courts and the agency are not 

required to make findings on issues the decision of which is unnecessary to the 

results).

The stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-09-019]

      ( print page 33474)    

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

July 10, 2009 at 11 a.m.

# PLACE:

Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS:

Open to the public.

## Matters To Be Considered

1. Agenda for future meetings: none.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification  List.

4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-464 and 731-TA-1160 (Preliminary) (Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from China)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determinations to the Secretary of Commerce on or before July 13, 2009; Commissioners' opinions are currently scheduled to be transmitted to the Secretary of Commerce on or before July 20, 2009.)

5. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-465 and 731-TA-1161 (Preliminary) (Certain Steel Grating from China)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determinations to the Secretary of Commerce on or before July 13, 2009; Commissioners' opinions are currently scheduled to be transmitted to the Secretary of Commerce on or before July 20, 2009.)

6. Outstanding action jackets: None.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

Issued: July 1, 2009.

By order of the Commission.

William R. Bishop,

Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.

 [FR Doc. E9-16609 Filed 7-9-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Consumer Price Index, Bureau of Labor Statistics, February 2020 

Consumer Price Index: Changes in Seasonal Adjustment Status for 2020

These items are changing to Seasonally Adjusted:

Item code Title

CUUR0000SEEE04

CWUR0000SEEE04

CUUR0000SEFL03

CWUR0000SEFL03 

CUUR0000SEFT02 

CWUR0000SEFT02 

CUUR0000SEFT06 

CWUR0000SEFT06

Telephone hardware, calculators, and other consumer 

information items

Tomatoes

Frozen and freeze dried prepared foods 

Other miscellaneous foods 

 
Consumer Price Index, Bureau of Labor Statistics, February 2020 

These items are changing to Not Seasonally Adjusted:

Item code Title

CUUR0000SEAA02 

CWUR0000SEAA02 

CUUR0000SEFL02 

CWUR0000SEFL02

Men’s underwear, nightwear, swimwear, 

and accessories

Lettuce

CUUR0000SEHJ

CWUR0000SEHJ

Furniture and bedding

CUUR0000SEHP03 

CWUR0000SEHP03 

CUUR0000SS02042 

CUUR0000SS68023 

Moving, storage, freight expense

Cookies

Tax return preparation and other 

accounting fees
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 I, Emmanuel Roman, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GLG Partners, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  November 9, 2009
    /s/ Emmanuel RomanEmmanuel RomanCo-Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

RICHARD BENNETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF EAST ORANGE, 

OFFICER DAMON JOHNSON (Badge #138), 

and DETECTIVE HIMONSHU ANTALA 

(Badge #56),

 Defendants.

Civ. No. 11-359 (KSH) (PS)

ORDER

For the reasons expressed in the opinion filed herewith,

IT IS on this 21th day of December 2012, hereby

ORDERED that defendant City of East Orange’s motion for summary judgment [D.E. 64] 

is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the City of East Orange is hereby dismissed as a party to this litigation; 

and it is further

ORDERED that defendant Antala’s motion for summary judgment [D.E. 63] is denied.

/s /Katharine S. Hayden_____ 

Katharine S. Hayden, U.S.D.J.

Case 2:11-cv-00359-KSH-PS Document 81 Filed 12/21/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1504
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

MS. GOLDA D. HARRIS, 

Civil Action No. 11-1321 (MAS) (DEA) 

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER 

COMMISSIONER GARY LANIGAN, 

et al., 

Defendants. 

This matter comes before the Court on a civil Complaint filed by Plaintiff Golda D. Harris 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that her rights under federal law have been violated. 

Presently before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 40, and a Report and 

Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert, recommending dismissal, ECF No. 54. 

The Court has carefully reviewed the parties' submissions on this matter. For the reasons stated 

in the Memorandum Opinion filed on even date, and for good cause shown, 

IT IS on this f'S(- day of ({'Ll.tt , 2016, 

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert, 

ECF No. 54, is hereby ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court; it is further 

ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 40, is hereby GRANTED; it is 

further 

ORDERED that Plaintiff's requests for default and default judgement, ECF Nos. 77 & 78, 

are hereby DENIED; it is further 

ORDERED that the Complaint, ECF No. 1, is hereby DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE; and it is further 

Case 3:11-cv-01321-MAS-DEA Document 82 Filed 07/01/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1040
ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order and the accompanying 

Memorandum Opinion upon the parties, and shall CLOSE the file. 

Mic~D-.J-. ------

2 

Case 3:11-cv-01321-MAS-DEA Document 82 Filed 07/01/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1041
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Defense General Services Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration 48 CFR Chapter 1
[Docket FAR 2009-0002, Sequence 6]
 AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
 ACTION: Small Entity Compliance Guide.
 SUMMARY: This document is issued under the joint authority of the Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of General Services and the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This 
                            *Small Entity Compliance Guide*
                             has been prepared in accordance with Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. It consists of a summary of the rule appearing in Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-35 which amends the FAR. Interested parties may obtain further information regarding these rules by referring to FAC 2005-35 which precedes this document. These documents are also available via the Internet at 
                            *http://www.regulations.gov*.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hada Flowers, FAR Secretariat, (202) 208-7282. For clarification of content, contact the analyst whose name appears in the table below. Rule Listed in FAC 2005-35
Subject
FAR case
AnalystRevocation of Executive Order 13202
2009-015
Woodson


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A summary for the FAR rule follows. For the actual revisions and/or amendments to this FAR case, refer to FAR case 2009-015. FAC 2005-35 amends the FAR as specified below: Revocation of Executive Order 13202 (FAR Case 2009-015) In accordance with Executive Order 13502—Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects, this final rule amends FAR 36.202(d) to delete references to the revoked Executive Order 13202. The E.O. prohibited executive departments and agencies from requiring or prohibiting Federal Government contractors and subcontractors' entrance into project labor agreements. This rule requires no action on the part of contracting officers. Dated: July 9, 2009. Al Matera, Director,  Office of Acquisition Policy.


[FR Doc. E9-16618 Filed 7-10-09; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Gordon S. Glenn, the chief executive officer of SXC Health Solutions Corp., certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of SXC Health Solutions Corp. for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SXC Health
Solutions Corp. /s/ Jeffrey Park
Jeffrey Park
Chief Financial Officer May 9, 2008
EX-10.16



 Exhibit 10.16 
 BJ’S RESTAURANTS, INC. 
 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD CERTIFICATE 
 (for Non-Employee Directors) 
 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that BJ’s
Restaurants, Inc., a California corporation (the “COMPANY”), has offered you (the “GRANTEE”) the right to receive restricted stock units (“RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS” or “AWARD”) under the Company’s 2005
Equity Incentive Plan (the “PLAN”) on the terms set forth below. 
  

			
	 Name of Grantee:
	  	 Address of Grantee:
  

 
  
  


 Number of Shares: 
 Offer Grant Date: 
 Vesting Schedule: 

 

					
	 Vesting Period
	  	Award
Percentage
Vesting at
End of
Vesting
Period	 
		
	 Grant Date through 1st Year Anniversary of Grant Date
	  	 	33.3	% 
		
	 Grant Date through 2nd Year Anniversary of Grant Date
	  	 	33.3	% 
		
	 Grant Date through 3rd Year Anniversary of Grant Date
	  	 	33.3	% 

 By your signature and the signature of the Company’s representative below, you and the Company agree to be bound by
all of the terms and conditions of the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, which is attached hereto. By executing this Certificate, you hereby irrevocably elect to accept the Restricted Stock Units rights granted pursuant to this Certificate and the
related Restricted Stock Unit Agreement and to receive the Award of Restricted Stock Units designated above subject to the terms of this Certificate, the Plan and the Award Agreement. 

 

							
	GRANTEE:	 		 	BJ’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
				
		 		 	By:	 	
	  
	 		 		 	  

	[Signature]	 		 		 	
		 		 	Name:	 	Jerry Detichle
	Name:	 		 	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of American Machine, Inc.on Form 10-KSB for
the period ending  December 31, 2002, as filed with the  Securities and Exchange
Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Daniel L.  Hodges,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



 /s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
Chief Financial Officer
February 13, 2003