alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2374336.2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

JENNIFER L. KASILAG, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

HARTFORD INVESTMENT FINANCIAL 

SERVICES, LLC, 

Defendant. 

Civ. A. No. 11-cv-1083 (RMB/KMW) 

Filed Electronically 

 

JENNIFER L. KASILAG, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

HARTFORD FUNDS MANAGEMENT 

COMPANY LLC, 

Defendant. 

Civ. A. No. 14-cv-1611 (RMB/KMW) 

 

JENNIFER L. KASILAG, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

HARTFORD FUNDS MANAGEMENT 

COMPANY LLC, 

 Defendant. 

Civ. A. No. 15-cv-1876 (RMB/KMW) 

AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL 

TO THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW Document 265 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 12739
2 

2374336.2 

 Notice is hereby given that Plaintiffs Jennifer Kasilag, Louis Mellinger, 

Judith Menendez, Jacqueline Robinson, Courtney Russell, Dennis Russell and 

K.D. Kohl Trust, on behalf of the Hartford Healthcare Fund, Hartford Inflation 

Plus Fund, Hartford Balanced Fund, Hartford Capital Appreciation Fund, Hartford 

Growth Opportunities Fund and the Hartford Floating Rate Fund, appeal to the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from: (1) the March 24, 2016 

Order (Dkt. No. 181) of the United States District Court, District of New Jersey, 

which granted partial summary judgment in favor of Defendants and against 

Plaintiffs; and (2) the February 28, 2017 Order (Dkt. No. 263) entering final 

judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs. 

Dated: March 29, 2017 /s/Arnold C. Lakind 

 Arnold C. Lakind 

 SZAFERMAN LAKIND, 

 BLUMSTEIN & BLADER, P.C.

 101 Grovers Mill Rd, Suite 200 

 Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 

 Telephone: (609) 275-0400 

 Fax: (609) 275-4511 

 alakind@szaferman.com

 Counsel for all Plaintiffs-Appellants 

 

Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW Document 265 Filed 03/29/17 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 12740
3 

2374336.2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 This is to certify that the within Amended Notice of Appeal was filed with 

the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey using 

the CM/ECF system, which will automatically provide notice to the following 

attorneys of record, counsel for Appellees-Defendants, by electronic means: 

Anthony J. Sylvester 

Sherman, Wells, Sylvester & Stamelman, LLP 

210 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor 

Florham Park, New Jersey 07932 

 In addition, this Amended Notice of Appeal was served by regular mail and 

email upon Sean M. Murphy whose address is: 

Sean M. Murphy 

MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & McCLOY LLP 

28 Liberty Street 

New York, NY 10005 

smurphy@milbank.com 

This 29th day of March, 2017 

By: s/Arnold Lakind 

SZAFERMAN, LAKIND, 

BLUMSTEIN, & BLADER, P.C. 

101 Gravers Mill Road, Suite 200 

Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 

Phone: (609) 275-4511 

Fax: (609) 275-4511 

Counsel for all Plaintiffs-Appellants 

Case 1:11-cv-01083-RMB-KMW Document 265 Filed 03/29/17 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 12741
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1347 

To require the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique 

ZIP code for particular communities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2019 

Mr. RUBIO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the United States Postal Service to designate 

a single, unique ZIP code for particular communities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ZIP CODES. 

4 Not later than September 30, 2019, the United 

5 States Postal Service shall designate a single, unique ZIP 

6 code for, as nearly as practicable, each of the following 

7 communities: 

8 (1) Ocoee, Florida. 

9 (2) Miami Lakes, Florida. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 49 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 49

   To permanently extend the moratorium enacted by the Internet Tax 
                  Freedom Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

    Mr. Cox (for himself, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Cannon, Mr. Chabot, Mr. 
   Cunningham, Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia, Mr. Dreier, Mr. Flake, Mr. 
  Goodlatte, Mr. Herger, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Issa, Mr. McKeon, Mr. Gary G. 
 Miller of California, Mr. Ose, Mr. Pence, Mr. Platts, Mr. Pombo, Mr. 
 Rohrabacher, Mr. Weldon of Florida, Mr. Doolittle, Mrs. Musgrave, Ms. 
 Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida, Mr. Sweeney, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. 
 King of Iowa, Mr. McCotter, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Royce, Mr. Tancredo, 
   Mr. Blunt, Mr. Dicks, Mr. Lewis of California, and Mr. Beauprez) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To permanently extend the moratorium enacted by the Internet Tax 
                  Freedom Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Internet Tax Nondiscrimination 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF INTERNET TAX FREEDOM ACT MORATORIUM.

    (a) Permanent Extension; Internet Access Taxes.--Section 1101 of 
the Internet Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``taxes during the period beginning on 
        October 1, 1998, and ending on November 1, 2003--'' and 
        inserting ``taxes after September 30, 1998:'';
            (2) by striking paragraph (1) of subsection (a) and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(1) Taxes on Internet access.'',
            (3) by striking ``multiple'' in paragraph (2) of subsection 
        (a) and inserting ``Multiple'';
            (4) by striking subsection (d); and
            (5) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections 
        (d) and (e), respectively.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1104(10) of the Internet Tax 
Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) is amended by striking ``unless'' and 
all that follows through ``1998''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 32117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15959]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XP98


Marine Mammals; File No. 14483

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; issuance of permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Ocean World, 304 US Highway 101 
South, Crescent City, California 95531 [Mary Wilson, Responsible Party] 
has been issued a permit to import three California sea lions (Zalophus 
californianus) for public display.

ADDRESSES: The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office(s):
    Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 
20910; phone (301)713-2289; fax (301)713-0376; and
    Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long 
Beach, CA 90802-4213; phone (562)980-4001; fax (562)980-4018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Skidmore or Kristy Beard, 
(301)713-2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 21, 2009, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (74 FR 18200) that a request for a public display 
permit to import three female California sea lions from Zoo Tiergarten 
Nuremberg in Nuremberg, Germany to Ocean World, Crescent City, 
California, had been submitted by the above-named organization. The 
requested permit has been issued under the authority of the Marine 
Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), and 
the regulations governing the taking and importing of marine mammals 
(50 CFR part 216).
    In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), a final determination has been made that the 
activity proposed is categorically excluded from the requirement to 
prepare an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement.

    Dated: June 30, 2009.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of 
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9-15959 Filed 7-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

35. Persons not in the labor force by desire and availability for work, age, and sex

(In thousands)

Category

Total Age Sex

1997 1998

16 to 24

years

25 to 54

years

55 years

and over Men Women

1997 1998 1997 1998 1997 1998 1997 1998 1997 1998

Total not in the labor force .................................................... 66,837 67,547 11,343 11,343 18,552 18,732 36,942 37,472 24,454 24,799 42,382 42,748

 Do not want a job now1 ...................................................... 61,895 62,735 9,434 9,491 16,311 16,580 36,151 36,664 22,420 22,790 39,475 39,945

 Want a job1 ......................................................................... 4,941 4,812 1,909 1,852 2,241 2,152 791 807 2,034 2,008 2,907 2,803

 Did not search for work in previous year .......................... 2,857 2,859 1,034 1,011 1,245 1,240 579 608 1,118 1,134 1,739 1,725

 Searched for work in previous year2 ................................ 2,084 1,953 875 841 997 912 212 200 917 875 1,168 1,078

 Not available to work now ............................................... 669 643 346 332 289 275 34 36 257 250 412 392

 Available to work now ..................................................... 1,416 1,310 529 509 708 637 178 164 659 624 756 686

 Reason not currently looking:

 Discouragement over job prospects3 ................... 343 331 107 108 184 170 52 53 200 198 143 133

 Reasons other than discouragement .......................... 1,073 979 423 401 524 467 126 111 460 427 613 552

 Family responsibilities .............................................. 139 143 26 37 97 93 16 13 21 23 117 120

 In school or training .................................................. 235 206 188 173 45 32 2 1 113 105 121 102

 Ill health or disability ................................................. 116 104 17 14 71 69 28 21 52 52 64 52

 Other4 ....................................................................... 583 525 191 177 311 273 81 75 273 247 311 278

1 Includes some persons who are not asked if they want a job. 2 Persons who had a job in the prior 12 months must have searched since

the end of that job. 3 Includes believes no work available, could not find work, lacks necessary

schooling or training, employer thinks too young or old, and other types of

discrimination.

4 Includes those who did not actively look for work in the prior 4 weeks for

such reasons as child-care and transportation problems, as well as a small

number for which reason for nonparticipation was not ascertained.

 NOTE: Beginning in January 1998, data reflect new composite estimation

procedures and revised population controls used in the household survey.

210
EXHIBIT 32.1
                             RESOLVE STAFFING, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Resolve Staffing,  Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the Report),  I, Ronald  Heineman,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Resolve  Staffing,  Inc.  and will be retained by Resolve  Staffing,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.

Date:  April [ ], 2004


/s/ Ronald Heineman
--------------------------------
Ronald Heineman
Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4978 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4978

To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to condition 
the payment of employer prescription drug subsidies on the maintenance 
                 of current prescription drug benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2004

  Mr. Nadler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to condition 
the payment of employer prescription drug subsidies on the maintenance 
                 of current prescription drug benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prescription Plan Preservation Act 
of 2004''.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONING THE PAYMENT OF MEDICARE EMPLOYER PRESCRIPTION DRUG 
              SUBSIDIES ON THE MAINTENANCE OF CURRENT PRESCRIPTION DRUG 
              BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1860D-22(a)(2)(A) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-132(a)(2)(A)) is amended to read as follows::
                    ``(A) Attestation of actuarial equivalence to 
                standard coverage.--The sponsor of the plan provides 
                the Secretary, annually or at such other time as the 
                Secretary may require, with an attestation that the 
                actuarial value of prescription drug coverage under the 
                plan (as determined using the processes and methods 
                described in section 1860D-11(c)) is at least equal to 
                the greater of--
                            ``(i) the actuarial value of standard 
                        prescription drug coverage; or
                            ``(ii) the actuarial value of the 
                        employment-based retiree health coverage that 
                        was in effect as of December 8, 2003.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of the Medicare 
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public 
Law 108-173).
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 1 of 29 PageID: 45
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 2 of 29 PageID: 46
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 3 of 29 PageID: 47
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 4 of 29 PageID: 48
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 5 of 29 PageID: 49
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 6 of 29 PageID: 50
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 7 of 29 PageID: 51
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 8 of 29 PageID: 52
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 9 of 29 PageID: 53
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 10 of 29 PageID: 54
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 11 of 29 PageID: 55
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 12 of 29 PageID: 56
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 13 of 29 PageID: 57
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 14 of 29 PageID: 58
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 15 of 29 PageID: 59
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 16 of 29 PageID: 60
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 17 of 29 PageID: 61
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 18 of 29 PageID: 62
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 19 of 29 PageID: 63
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 20 of 29 PageID: 64
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 21 of 29 PageID: 65
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 22 of 29 PageID: 66
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 23 of 29 PageID: 67
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 24 of 29 PageID: 68
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 25 of 29 PageID: 69
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 26 of 29 PageID: 70
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 27 of 29 PageID: 71
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 28 of 29 PageID: 72
Case 2:11-cv-01953-KM-LDW Document 5 Filed 04/26/11 Page 29 of 29 PageID: 73
EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dollarama Group L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending
August 5, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Larry Rossy and Robert Coallier, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the general partner of the Company,
Dollarama Group GP Inc., certify that to our knowledge:

1. the Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange of 1934, as amended; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: September 19, 2007



/s/ LARRY ROSSYLarry RossyChief Executive Officer/s/ ROBERT COALLIERRobert CoallierChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Consolidated
Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Income, Consolidated Statements of
Stockholders' Equity, and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          27,495
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,197,148
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (35,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    662,323
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,884,768
<PP&E>                                       1,365,724
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,014,068)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,548,723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,586,453
<BONDS>                                        280,173
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       265,332
<OTHER-SE>                                     416,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,548,723
<SALES>                                      2,200,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,200,603
<CGS>                                        1,338,466
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,338,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               822,886
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (35,210)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,041
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,041
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 130 (Thursday, July 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16213]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Secretary


List of Countries Requiring Cooperation With an International 
Boycott

    In order to comply with the mandate of section 999(a)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is 
publishing a current list of countries which require or may require 
participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within 
the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).
    On the basis of the best information currently available to the 
Department of the Treasury, the following countries require or may 
require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott 
(within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986).

Kuwait
Lebanon
Libya
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Syria
United Arab Emirates
Yemen, Republic of

    Iraq is not included in this list, but its status with respect to 
future lists remains under review by the Department of the Treasury.

    Dated: July 1, 2009.
John L. Harrington,
International Tax Counsel (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. E9-16213 Filed 7-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-M