alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5042 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5042

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 6, 2004

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 1944 to ensure 
  that the dependents of employees of the Forest Service stationed in 
 Puerto Rico receive a high-quality elementary and secondary education.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO COVER EXPENSES OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY 
              SCHOOLING OF DEPENDENTS OF FOREST SERVICE PERSONNEL IN 
              PUERTO RICO.

    Section 202 of the Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 1944 
(16 U.S.C. 554b) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a) Provision of Medical Care; Related 
        Transportation.--'' before ``Appropriations for the Forest 
        Service''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(b) Coverage of Dependent Educational Expenses in Puerto Rico; 
Related Transportation.--(1) Appropriations for the Forest Service 
shall be available to the Secretary of Agriculture to cover the cost of 
primary and secondary schooling of dependents of Forest Service 
personnel, who are stationed in Puerto Rico and are subject to transfer 
and reassignment to other locations in the United States, but not to 
exceed the costs authorized by the Department of Defense for the same 
area for dependents of members of the Armed Forces, when it is 
determined by the Secretary that the schools available in the area of 
Puerto Rico in which the dependents reside are unable to provide 
adequately for the education of the dependents.
    ``(2) If the Secretary determines that the school attended by a 
dependent described in paragraph (1) is not accessible by public means 
of transportation on a regular basis, the Secretary may provide, out of 
funds appropriated for the Forest Service, for the transportation of 
the dependent between the school and the place of residence of the 
dependent.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 5, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001105862
<NAME>                        GSI Technologies USA Inc.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                               4,404
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,096,664
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,101,986
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,582,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,410,424
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            20,544
<OTHER-SE>                                         151,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       171,756
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   250,000
<CGS>                                              596,409
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,953,514
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  45,121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,325,466)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,325,466)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,325,466)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.066)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.066)



</TABLE>
!7c1ubaio & iii/ ATTORNEYS AT LAW

725 BROADWAY

BAYONNE, NEW JERSEY 07002

TEL: (201) 858-3771

FAX: (201) 858-8604

MICHELE A. ADUBATO

BETH M. JAFFE

January 25, 2012

Hon. Jose Linares, U.S.D.J.

MLK,Jr, Courthouse

50 Walnut Street/PO Box 999

Newark. NJ. Ui 101

RE: GALITANO GJONI

CRIMNOOt ///

Dear Judge Linares:

On March 17, 2009, this office was assigned to represent Galitano Gjoni under the CJA

in the aboveentitIed matter.

Mr. Gjoni was set to be sentenc:d on February 2, 2012 hut his sentencing has been

adjourned at the request of the Government without objection. Mr. Gjoni probably will not be

sentenced for another six months.

In light of the fact we have represented Mr. Gjoni for nearly a three year period, we

request leave of the court to file and interim bill for our services to date.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Respcctfuliy yours,

ADUBATO & I *

/

Michele A. Adubto

“nc

SO OiDiRf:
Case 3:11-cr-00043-JAP   Document 10   Filed 02/28/11   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 20

Case 3:11-cr-00043-JAP   Document 10   Filed 02/28/11   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 21
Case 2:11-cv-01547-JLL-CCC Document 8 Filed 05/10/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 20
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment (this
“Amendment”) between Alterra Capital Holdings Limited, a Bermuda company (the “Company”), and W. Marston Becker (the “Executive”) is entered into as of this 26th day of February 2013. 

RECITALS 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive previously entered into the employment agreement, dated as of June 1, 2011
(the “Employment Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Employment
Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual
premises, covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Clause (a) of the third paragraph of Section 3.8 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety as follows: 


“(a) Severance pay in the aggregate amount of two and one-half times the sum of (i) Executive’s Base Salary plus
(ii) the greater of (A) the Annual Cash Bonus for the immediately preceding calendar year and (B) the target Annual Cash Bonus for the then current calendar year, which shall be paid in 12 equal monthly installments beginning on the
Company’s first payroll date following the 65th day after the Termination Date; provided, that, notwithstanding any of the foregoing to the contrary, if such termination occurs during the 2013 calendar year, the amount of the
severance pay shall be equal to two and one-half times the sum of (x) Executive’s Base Salary plus (y) the target Annual Cash Bonus for the 2013 calendar year;” 

 

	2.	Except as set forth in this Amendment, all provisions, terms and conditions in the Employment Agreement remain unmodified and in full force and effect, and the
Employment Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. 

  

	3.	The Employment Agreement, as amended by the terms of this Amendment, supersedes the prior terms of the Employment Agreement. 


 

	4.	This Amendment may be executed in duplicate counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which, taken together, shall constitute one
agreement. 

  

	5.	This Amendment will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. 


[signature page follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date and year first
written above. 
  

			
	ALTERRA CAPITAL HOLDINGS LIMITED
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Name:
		 	Title:
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	  

	W. Marston Becker
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 794 

Supporting the designation of January 2020 as ‘‘National One Health Awareness Month’’ to promote awareness of organizations focused on public 

health, animal health, and environmental health collaboration throughout 

the United States and to recognize the critical contributions of those 

organizations to the future of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 14, 2020 

Mr. SCHRADER (for himself and Mr. YOHO) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of January 2020 as ‘‘National 

One Health Awareness Month’’ to promote awareness 

of organizations focused on public health, animal health, 

and environmental health collaboration throughout the 

United States and to recognize the critical contributions 

of those organizations to the future of the United States. 

Whereas One Health is a collaborative, multisectoral, and 

transdisciplinary approach, working at the local, regional, 

national, and global levels, with the goal of achieving optimal health outcomes recognizing the interconnection between people, animals, plants, and their shared environment; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 794 IH 

Whereas the mission of One Health is to establish closer professional interactions, collaborations, and educational opportunities across the various medical, veterinary, and 

environmental health professions and their allied science 

professions to simultaneously improve public health, animal health, and environmental health; 

Whereas the increasing threats posed by emerging diseases 

shared between animals and people, foodborne, vectorborne, and waterborne diseases, and changes to the environment make the necessity of One Health clear and demand an integrated effort by professionals from multiple 

disciplines, including health, science, technology, and engineering; 

Whereas according to the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention, up to 75 percent of new or emerging infectious diseases in people are spread by animals; 

Whereas, each year, International One Health Day is November 3; and 

Whereas One Health is essential to combating and strengthening the surveillance of emerging and reemerging diseases: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of ‘‘National One Health Awareness 

3 Month’’— 

4 (1) to promote awareness of organizations that 

5 focus on One Health efforts to improve the quality 

6 of life for people and animals; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 794 IH 

1 (2) to recognize the efforts made by those orga2 nizations in using a One Health approach to prevent 

3 epidemics; and 

4 (3) to recognize the importance of using the 

5 One Health approach to simultaneously protect the 

6 health of people, animals, plants, and the environ7 ment in the United States. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

LAMARR ROWELL, 

Appellant, 

No. 69676 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

FILED 

MAR 25 2016 

TRACIE K LII4DEMAN 

CLERK CF SUPREME COURT 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL BY _SLY(Ir-C-1-nate_. 

DEPUTY CLERK 

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order transferring 

petition. Eleventh Judicial District Court, Pershing County; Jim C. 

Shirley, Judge. 

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the 

aforementioned order, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo u. State, 106 Nev. 349, 

352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

Cherry 

°Aut. 

cc: Hon. Richard Scotti, District Judge 

Hon. Jim C. Shirley, District Judge 

Lamarr Rowell 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

Pershing County Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

1(,-ORSI 7 (0) I 947A Ce#10
1

The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable Beverly Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-2452

___________

Charles Bausley, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Bender, Deputy; Ritter, Deputy, * Western District of Arkansas.

*

Appellees. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________

Submitted: October 1, 2004

Filed: October 13, 2004

___________

Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Charles Bausley appeals the district court’s1

 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

action claiming defendant jail personnel violated his constitutional rights by moving

him to a different cell after a fight, without letting him present his version of the

incident, and by seizing property from his cell. Having carefully reviewed the record,

we conclude dismissal was proper for the reasons the district court stated. See Sandin
-2-

v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 486 (1995); Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 525-36

(1984). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Exhibit
32.01


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PlayBox (US) Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gideon
Jung
  (1)        The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
   /s/
      Gideon
      JungBy:
      Gideon
      Jung
                    Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 1
#### John DeRaffele, Appellant, v 210-220-230 Owners Corp., Respondents.

[823 NYS2d 202]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered October 5, 2005, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants 210-220-230 Owners Corp., Joseph DeChicco, Gary Drago, Faul Tucci, Robert Mallon, Sandy Slotter, Grace Knoles, Josh Bisignano, and Finger & Finger, EC., which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and granted that branch of the separate motion of the defendant Linda Darin which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the defendants 210-220-230 Owners Corp., Joseph DeChicco, Gary Drago, Faul Tucci, Robert Mallon, Sandy Slotter, Grace Knoles, Josh Bisignano, and Finger & Finger, EC.

The plaintiffs claims in this action are based on his contention that he is a holder of unsold shares appurtenant to certain apartments in the defendant cooperative apartment corporation, 210-220-230 Owners Corp. (hereinafter the Cooperative). We have rejected that contention in *210-220-230 Owners Corp. v DeRaffele*(33 AD3d 788 [2006] [decided herewith]).

In any event, with respect to the cause of action to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty, the plaintiff failed to allege sufficient specific facts *(see*CFLR 3016 [b]) that the actions of the individual defendants, who are members of the Cooperative’s Board of Directors, were undertaken in bad faith *(see*
      *753
      *Hochman v 35 Park W. Corp.,*293 AD2d 650 [2002]), or that any damages were attributable to their actions *(see Willberry Corp. v Schwartz,*29 AD3d 899 [2006]). The plaintiff made only conclusory allegations of emotional distress, harassment, or humiliation *(see Stone v Aronwald & Pykett,*275 AD2d 706 [2000]); accordingly, the cause of action to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty, was properly dismissed.

With respect to the plaintiff’s claim that the Cooperative breached a prior agreement that the shares appurtenant to the apartments he owns would be considered unsold shares, the plaintiff was not a party to that agreement so that he could enforce it against the Cooperative *(see Hoffman v Unterberg,*9 AD3d 386, 388 [2004]).

Finally, conspiracy cannot stand as a separate cause of action *(see Kestenbaum v Suroff,*268 AD2d 560 [2000]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint.

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are either not properly before this Court or without merit. Miller, J.E, Ritter, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

lbnambl8L.A.vood 

8Uta 8uporintoadollt of rubllo lMtrwt1oa 

Awtda, Toxu 

In Uw ouo ooaaldorio uld r tlll - tvo 

Rwton,rouldheYo 0 irsd lzll942. m-8.Ievtm 

vu appolntod by thm “E Iluionora* bourt to ill1 

thr -y orutod by the bath ot br husband. 

“Al ths abow wntioMa 0piPlon holdr tbt the 

vill~pworof the pwplomuatpw8lltozam 
Bononblo L. A. voQd8, Paw 2 

m iaambellt at the next g*no?81 *lootIon, vlll 

the person rloeted to the pm. of oount7 *uporbttmdent rt the forthoomlag gonon l lootlon 

*orve for a four-par ponrlod, or vi11 rueh l p er - 

*on **mm until 1942, vhIoh 18 th* tlm tha COUP- 

- ter m, to vttIonrh .o uyTn. evto nvu l 18Qted, vi11 WY* rxplnd?a 

Our opinion Ho. O-1664, roforred to In rour lottor, 

hold8 that one &ppoInted to the offlcr of aounty ruprlntondent tq the coPrmi88Io~rs' oourt tills rush vrcmcy only until 

the next gene-1 l leotIon. The only question vlth vhloh ve 

are concerned In thU oplnlon I8 IJ *t&ted above. 

~tu Conrtltution of TO-*, ktlole 16, Section 27, 

proYlde8 I 

_- 

*In all eleotIon* to fill vao8ncler of offloe in thlr 3tbte1 I 8hl.l W to fill the unexpllwd term OnlJ. 

The Lcglmlature, to give effect to Art1018 16, SOOti0n 27 0s t.h0 c0mtitUtioD, 8~ 

rd?' 

emoted Article 20, Vernon** Clrll Btatuter, vbioh 8 88 r0ih8t 

'All eleotloru to fill vrcmcler in otflce 

*h&l be to fill the unexpired tenu only.' 

368. 

Also see mckm 08. curl, 38 Clr. A&. 445, 86 3v 

In vIev of the foregoing ruthorltler, JOU me nrpoctfully rdrI*ed tht lt I8 the opinion OS thlr department t&t 

the peruon elrcted to county rchool 8uperIateulsnt at the torthoomiag genenl election, under the oiroua8tumer art out In your 

letter, vi11 be l leot8d to further till the v*ornoy In 0rrm 

ometed by the death of Mr. fevton, that IS, until the gensnl 
, 

Bononblr L. A. Cods, Page J 

l lootlon In 1942, vhon e. Revton's ter m vouid have l xpirw.l. 

Trusting that this rrtIrf8otorll~ dlrporsr of your 

inquiry, ve rewin
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the interim report of DoMark International, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, R. Thomas Kidd, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

DOMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC.


By /s/ R. Thomas Kidd
  ------------------------------
  R. Thomas Kidd
  Principal Financial Officer
  January 14, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.1

SOUTHLAND HEALTH SERVICES, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Larry N. Lunan, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Southland Health Services, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the year ended December 30, 2006 (the Report) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof:



|1. | Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | That the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      |  | 
|------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Larry N. Lunan                    |  | 
|Larry N. Lunan                        |  | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|May 21, 2007                          |  |