alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CAMDEN VICINAGE

CITY SELECT AUTO SALES, 

INC., a New Jersey corporation, 

individually and as the 

representative of a class of similarly 

situated persons,

Plaintiff/Appellant,

v.

RAYMOND MILEY III,

 Defendant/Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Notice of Appeal 

No.: 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW

Judge Jerome B. Simandle

PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT’S NOTICE OF APPEAL

TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Notice is hereby given that City Select Auto Sales, Inc., individually 

and as the representative of a certified class of similarly-situated persons, 

Plaintiff in the above-named case, hereby appeals to the United States Court 

of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1) from all adverse pretrial and trial rulings

of the District Court, including but not limited to the jury instructions given 

by the District Court over Plaintiff’s objections, and the answer given by the 

District Court to the jury’s question, over Plaintiff’s objections, (2) from the 

District Court’s Order entering the Jury Verdict in this action on the 27th 

day of May, 2016 (Doc. 241) (Exhibit A), and (3) in the event the District 

Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 248 Filed 06/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 9254
2

Court denies Plaintiff’s Motion for a New Trial on All Issues, from that 

adverse Order.

Plaintiff filed a Motion for a New Trial pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 59 (Doc. 247), which, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 4 (a)(4)(A)(v), has the effect of extending the time to file an 

appeal until the entry of an order disposing of the Motion for a New Trial.

Dated: June 27, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Alan C. Milstein

Alan C. Milstein

amilstein@shermansilverstein.com

SHERMAN, SILVERSTEIN, KOHL, 

ROSE AND PODOLSKY

308 Harper Dr., Ste. 200

Moorestown, NJ 08057

Telephone: 856-662-0700

Daniel J. Cohen (pro hac vice)

Tod A. Lewis (pro hac vice)

BOCK, HATCH, LEWIS & 

OPPENHEIM LLC

134 North La Salle St., Ste. 1000

Chicago, IL 60602

Telephone: 312-658-5500

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the 

Class

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on June 27, 2016, I caused the foregoing 

document to be filed using the Court’s CM/ECF system, which 

automatically serves a copy upon all counsel of record.

/s/ Alan C. Milstein

One of Plaintiff’s attorneys

Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 248 Filed 06/27/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 9255
Case 2:11-cv-02268-JAD Document 12-1 Filed 12/19/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 40
Case 2:11-cv-02268-JAD Document 12-1 Filed 12/19/11 Page 2 of 7 PageID: 41
Case 2:11-cv-02268-JAD Document 12-1 Filed 12/19/11 Page 3 of 7 PageID: 42
Case 2:11-cv-02268-JAD Document 12-1 Filed 12/19/11 Page 4 of 7 PageID: 43
Case 2:11-cv-02268-JAD Document 12-1 Filed 12/19/11 Page 5 of 7 PageID: 44
Case 2:11-cv-02268-JAD Document 12-1 Filed 12/19/11 Page 6 of 7 PageID: 45
Case 2:11-cv-02268-JAD Document 12-1 Filed 12/19/11 Page 7 of 7 PageID: 46
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dwayne Williams, Appellant.

[851 NYS2d 879]

The defendant failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that special circumstances existed warranting a downward departure from his presumptive risk level three designation. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in designating him a level three sex offender *(see People v Maiello,*32 AD3d 463 [2006]; *People v Guarnan,*8 AD3d 545 [2004]; *cf. People v Abdullah,*31 AD3d 515, 516 [2006]). Mastro, J.P., Florio, Miller and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
CHRISTOPHER M. PLACITELLA

cplacitella@cprlaw.com

August 18, 2021

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

Hon. Brian R. Martinotti, U.S.D.J.

United States District Court, District of New Jersey

Martin Luther King Building & U.S. Courthouse 

Court Room: MLK 2D

50 Walnut Street

Newark, NJ 07012

(F): (973) 645-6651

Re: Williams, et al. v. BASF Catalysts LLC, et al., No. 11-1754 (D.N.J.)

Dear Judge Martinotti:

Pursuant to the Preliminary Approval Order (ECF No. 623) and May 21, 2021 Case 

Management Order (ECF No. 635), Plaintiffs will be filing the Motion for Final Approval of the 

Class Action Settlement on August 19, 2021. Pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.2.(b), 

we now write to respectfully request permission to file a 96-page brief in support of Final

Approval, an issue of significant importance to this case. Plaintiffs respectfully believes that a 

96-page limit on the brief will assist the Court in considering the many factors that the Court 

must consider for the final approval of the Class Action Settlement pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 23(e).

We appreciate your consideration of this request.

Respectfully,

/s/ Christopher M. Placitella

CHRISTOPHER M. PLACITELLA

Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class

Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 636 Filed 08/18/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 49329
Hon. Brian R. Martinotti, U.S.D.J.

August 18, 2021

Page 2

cc:

Eugene F. Assaf, P.C. (counsel for BASF Catalysts LLC) (via e-mail only)

Peter A. Farrell, P.C. (counsel for BASF Catalysts LLC) (via e-mail only)

Nina M. Gussack, Esq. (counsel for Cahill Gordon & Reindel) (via e-mail only)

Anthony Vale, Esq. (counsel for Cahill Gordon & Reindel) (via e-mail only)

SO ORDERED:

______________________________

BRIAN R. MARTINOTTI, U.S.D.J.

Dated:

Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 636 Filed 08/18/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 49330
902 A.2d 1233

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DENEEN SMILEY, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

July 19, 2006.

ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the trial court for resentencing in light of *State v. Natale,*184 *N.J.*458, 878 A.2d 724 (2005).
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Principal Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 10, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony C.
      Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
                C. Pintsopoulos
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              July
                29, 2008
**Exhibit 31.1**I, Joseph A. Mills, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) (Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 34-47986);     c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: August 14, 2007 /s/Joseph A. Mills Joseph A. Mills    Chairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Eagle Rock     Energy G&P, LLC, GeneralPartner of Eagle Rock     Energy GP, L.P., General Partnerof Eagle Rock     Energy Partners, L.P.
Case 2:11-cv-02360-ES Document 2 Filed 05/09/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 30
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1298984
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1951246
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (167000)
<INVENTORY>                                    1196530
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4363834
<PP&E>                                         1437086
<DEPRECIATION>                                (1030726)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6565804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2818035
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        510237
<OTHER-SE>                                     1165991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6565804
<SALES>                                        7640595
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7640595
<CGS>                                          3747893
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4618131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (448294)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1084038)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      6000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1090038)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.07)



</TABLE>
CLOSED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 

:

JOSEPH ARUANNO, :

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

STEVEN JOHNSON, et al., :

:

Defendants. :

 :

Civil No. 11-1842 (JLL)

ORDER

For the reasons expressed in the Opinion filed herewith,

IT IS on this 22nd day of June, 2011,

ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the Complaint (Docket Entry #1) is dismissed with prejudice for failure

to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve this Order and the accompanying Opinion on

Plaintiff by regular mail and shall close the file.

/s/ Jose L. Linares 

JOSE L. LINARES, U.S.D.J.

Case 2:11-cv-01842-JLL-CCC Document 3 Filed 06/22/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 25
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ZZLL Information Technology Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of knowledge and belief:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: November 18,  2017

By :

/s/Sean Webster



Sean Webster



Chief Executive Officer



Date: November 18,  2017

By :

/s/Philip Lo



Philip Lo



Chief Financial Officer
SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CC: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge 

Fabien Hunt 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

2 

(0) I947A mize,
PROS 12*

(7193)

United States District Court

for

District of New Jersey

Report on Offender Under Supervision

Name of Offender: Issac Muldrow Cr.: 11-101-001

PACTS #: 60650

Name of Sentencing Judicial Officer: Jose L. Linares

Date of Original Sentence: 01/10/12

Original Offense: Possession of a weapon by convicted felon

Original Sentence: 3 months imprisonment; 3 years supervised release

Type of Supervision: Supervised Release Date Supervision Commenced: 4/23/12

NONCOMPLIANCE SUMMARY

The offender has not complied with the following condition(s) ofsupervision:

Violation Number Nature of Noncompliance

1 On May 18 and 24, 2012, Muldrow tested positive for marijuana. On July 11,

2012, Muldrow admitted to smoking marijuana on July 4, 2012.

U.S. Probation Officer Action:

We recommend that Muldrow participate in and complete Moral Reconation Therapy (MRT), which is a workshop

facilitated by the probation office. MRT is a systematic, cognitive-behavioral, step-by-step treatment program that

has resulted in significantly lower levels of rearrests and reincarcerations in participants by recognizing and

changing negative and criminal thinking patterns. IfYour Honor agrees with our plan, the probation office will also

present a copy ofthis order to the offender as a formal written reprimand. We will advise the Court of any additional

noncompliance.

Respectfully submitted,

Maureen

By: Amy J. Capozzolo Kelly

U.S. Probation Officer

Date: 07/12/12

The Court’s endorsement ofthis petition will serve as an official written reprimand to the offender unless the

Court directs that additional action be taken asfollows:

[ ] Submit a Request for Modifying the Conditions or Term of Supervision

[ ] Submit a Request for Warrant or Summons

[ ] Other

ofJudicial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1257
S. K. VARMA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JONATHAN W. DUDAS, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00421-JCC) Submitted: November 20, 2007 Decided: November 28, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. S. K. Varma, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: S. K. Varma appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on her age discrimination claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (2000), and her retaliation claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), and affirming the Merit Systems Protection Board’s decision affirming her removal from employment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Varma v. Dudas , No. 1:06-cv-00421-JCC (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# US

# Regional
#### The Tonawanda.1 Jarvis and others *v.*The Tonawanda.

*(Circuit Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.*

January 17, 1887.)

Maritime Lien—Laches.

Unregislered and secret maritime lions maybe enforced against a vessel m the hands of *bona fide*purchasers, unless the holders of such liens have been guilty of negligence or laches. See the same case, reported at length, in 27 Rod.'Rep. 575.

Jn Admiralty.

Appeal from district court. Sec 27 Fed. Rep. 575.

*Etting & Williams,*for libelants.

*Henry R. Edmunds,*for respondents.

1

 Reported by C. Berkeley Taylor, Esq., of the Philadelphia bar.

McKennan, J.

The defense of the respondents in this caso is apparently so equitable, and therefore meritorious, that J have examined and considered the whole case with an earnest desire to make that defense effective against the claim of the libelants. They have done nothing, and have not forborne to do anything, in mv judgment, which precludes the .assertion by them of any just or legal reason for denying their liability. They were *bona fide*purchasers of the vessel from its real as well as ostensible owners. They received assurances of the freedom of the vessel from all liens and charges, and they took from their vendor a conveyance, with his personal warranty, which was rendered ineffective by subsequent insolvency. Hence they had a right to believe that they had paid the full consideration for their purchase for which they were, in any wise, bound. But the libelants held an unregistered and secret lion upon the vessel, which they had an undoubted right to enforce, unless they have lost it by their own negligence. Greater promptitude on their part in tracing the ownership of the vessel, and in demanding payment for their debt from the purchasers of it, might have enabled the latter to protect themselves by a resort to their vendor; hut I am constrained to the conclusion, by the pressure of decided cases, that they are not chargeable with such laches as will subject them to the loss of their remedy against him. This is fully and satisfactorily described in the opinion of the learned judge who decided the case in the district court. T therefore adopt his views, and now order that a decree be prepared and entered in this court for the same sum decreed by the district court, in favor of the libelants, and against the respondents, with costs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Burgos, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 895]

Application by the ap *716pellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 22, 1997 *(People v Burgos,*245 AD2d 524 [1997]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 29, 1995.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Schmidt, J.E, Adams, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Donald A. Robinson, Esq.

Leda Dunn Wettre, Esq.

ROBINSON, WETTRE & MILLER LLC

One Newark Center

Newark, New Jersey 07102

(973) 690-5400

drobinson@rwmlegal.com

lwettre@rwmlegal.com

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant

Johnson & Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

In re JOHNSON & JOHNSON FCPA

SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE 

LITIGATION,

 

Master File No. 3:11-2511-FLW-TJB

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT the undersigned hereby enters an appearance in the 

above-entitled action on behalf of nominal defendant Johnson & Johnson.

ROBINSON, WETTRE & MILLER LLC

By: __s/Leda Dunn Wettre________

Leda Dunn Wettre

Dated: August 19, 2011

Case 3:11-cv-02511-FLW-DEA Document 28 Filed 08/19/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 383
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on August 19, 2011, I served the within Notice of Appearance on all counsel 

of record through the Court’s Electronic Filing Notification.

s/Leda Dunn Wettre

Leda Dunn Wettre

Case 3:11-cv-02511-FLW-DEA Document 28 Filed 08/19/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 384
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION****OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the yearly report of China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Zhilin Li, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant        to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350 as adopted pursuant section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.                 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Pharma Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by China Pharma Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|  |   |   | Date: June 24, 2009                            |   |   |
|--|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|  |        |        |                                           |        |        |
|  |   |   | By: /s/ Zhilin Li                              |   |   |
|  |   |   |        Zhilin Li |   |   |
|  |   |   | Chief Executive Officer                        |