34320 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 15, 2009 / Notices 

B. What actions could be taken to 

help ensure and maximize the quality, 

objectivity, utility, and integrity of the 

information to be collected? 

C. Are the instructions and definitions 

clear and sufficient? If not, which 

instructions need clarification? 

D. Can the information be submitted 

by the respondent by the due date? 

E. Public reporting burden for this 

collection is estimated to average: 

Form EIA–23S: 4 hours (small 

operators) 

Form EIA–23L: 32 hours 

(intermediate operators); 160 hours 

(large operators) 

Form EIA–64A: 6 hours (natural gas 

plant operators). 

The estimated burden includes the 

total time necessary to provide the 

requested information. In your opinion, 

how accurate is this estimate? 

F. The agency estimates that the only 

cost to a respondent is for the time it 

will take to complete the collection. 

Will a respondent incur any start-up 

costs for reporting, or any recurring 

annual costs for operation, maintenance, 

and purchase of services associated with 

the information collection? 

G. What additional actions could be 

taken to minimize the burden of this 

collection of information? Such actions 

may involve the use of automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

H. Does any other Federal, State, or 

local agency collect similar information? 

If so, specify the agency, the data 

element(s), and the methods of 

collection. 

As a Potential User of the Information 

To Be Collected: 

A. Is the proposed collection of 

information necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency and does the information have 

practical utility? 

B. What actions could be taken to 

help ensure and maximize the quality, 

objectivity, utility, and integrity of the 

information disseminated? 

C. Is the information useful at the 

levels of detail to be collected? 

D. For what purpose(s) would the 

information be used? Be specific. 

E. Are there alternate sources for the 

information and are they useful? If so, 

what are their weaknesses and/or 

strengths? 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized and/or 

included in the request for OMB 

approval of the form. They also will 

become a matter of public record. 

Statutory Authority: Federal Energy 

Administration Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 761 et 

seq.), and the DOE Organization Act (42 

U.S.C. 7101). 

Issued in Washington, DC, July 9, 2009. 

Stephanie Brown, 

Director, Statistics and Methods Group, 

Energy Information Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9–16822 Filed 7–14–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Project No. 13473–000] 

FFP Project 60, LLC; Notice of 

Preliminary Permit Application 

Accepted for Filing and Soliciting 

Comments, Motions To Intervene, and 

Competing Applications 

July 8, 2009. 

On May 22, 2009, FFP Project 60, LLC 

filed an application for a preliminary 

permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the 

Federal Power Act, proposing to study 

the feasibility of the Springfield Bend 

Hydrokinetic Project, to be located on 

the Mississippi River, in West Baton 

Rouge Parish, Louisiana and East Baton 

Rouge Parish, Louisiana. 

The sole purpose of a preliminary 

permit, if issued, is to grant the permit 

holder priority to file a license 

application during the permit term. A 

preliminary permit does not authorize 

the permit holder to perform any land 

disturbing activities or otherwise enter 

upon lands or waters owned by others 

without the owners’ express permission. 

The proposed Springfield Bend 

Hydrokinetic Project consists of: (1) 

2,090 proposed 40 kilowatt Free Flow 

generating units having a total installed 

capacity of 83.6 megawatts; (2) a 2.3- 

mile-long, 69 kilovolt transmission line; 

and (3) appurtenant facilities. The 

proposed Springfield Bend 

Hydrokinetic Project would have an 

average annual generation of 366 

gigawatt-hours. 

Applicant Contact: Ramya 

Swaminathan, Vice President of 

Development, Free Flow Power 

Corporation, 33 Commercial Street, 

Gloucester, MA 01930; phone: (978) 

226–1531. 

FERC Contact: Kim Carter, 202–502– 

6486. 

Deadline for filing comments, motions 

to intervene, competing applications 

(without notices of intent), or notices of 

intent to file competing applications: 60 

days from the issuance of this notice. 

Comments, motions to intervene, 

notices of intent, and competing 

applications may be filed electronically 

via the Internet. See 18 CFR 

385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions 

on the Commission’s Web site under the 

‘‘e-Filing’’ link. If unable to be filed 

electronically, documents may be paperfiled. To paper-file, an original and eight 

copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. 

Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission, 888 First 

Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 

more information on how to submit 

these types of filings, please go to the 

Commission’s Web site located at 

http://www.ferc.gov/filingcomments.asp. More information about 

this project, including a copy of the 

application, can be viewed or printed on 

the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link of Commission’s 

Web site at 

http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/

elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number 

(P–13473) in the docket number field to 

access the document. For assistance, 

call toll-free 1–866–208–3372. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–16720 Filed 7–14–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Project No. 13475–000] 

FFP Project 64, LLC; Notice of 

Preliminary Permit Application 

Accepted for Filing and Soliciting 

Comments, Motions To Intervene, and 

Competing Applications 

July 8, 2009. 

On May 22, 2009, FFP Project 64, LLC 

filed an application for a preliminary 

permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the 

Federal Power Act, proposing to study 

the feasibility of the Palmetto Point 

Hydrokinetic Project, to be located on 

the Mississippi River, in Concordia 

Parish, Louisiana and Wilkinson 

County, Mississippi. 

The sole purpose of a preliminary 

permit, if issued, is to grant the permit 

holder priority to file a license 

application during the permit term. A 

preliminary permit does not authorize 

the permit holder to perform any landdisturbing activities or otherwise enter 

upon lands or waters owned by others 

without the owners’ express permission. 

The proposed Palmetto Point 

Hydrokinetic Project consists of: (1) 

5,069 proposed 40 kilowatt Free Flow 

generating units having a total installed 

capacity of 202.76 megawatts; (2) a 7- 

mile-long, 69 kilovolt transmission line; 

and (3) appurtenant facilities. The 

proposed Palmetto Point Hydrokinetic 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES