alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PFE-12.31.2012-Ex 10.5






Exhibit 10.5


PFIZER LOGO


May 2012                




«FIRST_NAME» «LAST_NAME»
«ADDRESS1» 
«ADDRESS2»
«ADDRESS3»
«ADDRESS4»
«CITY», «STATE» «POSTAL»
«COUNTRY»






Dear «FIRST_NAME»:


On behalf of all our stakeholders, I want to thank you for the important role you play in Pfizer’s continued success.  I am pleased to inform you that on February 23, 2012, Pfizer’s Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved the following grant under Pfizer’s Executive Long-Term Incentive Program (“Program”).
	
				
	

Award Type
	Grant Price
	   
Shares (#)
	

Dates

	5-Year Total Shareholder Return Units (“5-YR TSRUs”) 


	$21.03
	«M_5Yr_TSRU»
	Grant Date – February 23, 2012
Vesting Date* – February 23, 2015
Settlement Date – February 23, 2017

	7-Year Total Shareholder Return Units (“7-YR TSRUs”) 


	$21.03
	«M_7Yr_TSRU»
	Grant Date – February 23, 2012
Vesting Date* – February 23, 2015
Settlement Date – February 23, 2019

	Performance Share Awards (“PSAs”)
	N/A
	«PFE_PS»
	Grant Date – February 23, 2012
Vesting Date* – February 23, 2015
Performance Period: January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2014

	Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)
	N/A
	«RSU»
	Grant Date – February 23, 2012
Vesting Date* – February 23, 2015




*This is also referred to as the date the restrictions lapse.


The enclosed Points of Interest document provides you with more detailed information about your grant and contains general information about the Program, applicable income tax consequences, and points of contact. This long-term incentive grant is governed by the terms and conditions set forth in this letter, the Points of Interest document and the Pfizer Inc 2004 Stock Plan, as amended and restated. It is important for you to read these materials, and it is recommended that you consult a qualified financial or tax advisor before making any decisions regarding the disposition of the stock resulting from the vesting of these awards.


These awards help you build ownership in Pfizer and a greater stake in the Company’s future success. I have great confidence in Pfizer’s future, and I look forward to working with you toward that future.  


Sincerely,


Ian C. Read
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MedPro Safety Products, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, W. Craig Turner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1)      | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and    |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |
| (2)      | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|                    |

|                  | MEPRO SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------|
|                  |
|                  |
| Dated: April 16, 2009 | By:                         | /s/W. Craig Turner |
|                  |                        |  |
|                  |                        | W. Craig Turner |
|                  |                        | Chief Executive Officer |

25

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002:





I, Kyle
Kennedy, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Seafarer
Exploration Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certifies,
based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2018, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”):





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





Date:
April 15, 2019





/s/ Kyle KennedyKyle
KennedyChief
Executive Officer(Principal
Executive Officer and acting Principal Accounting
Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4947 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4947

      To suspend the duty on certain educational toys and devices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2004

Mr. Herger (for himself and Mr. George Miller of California) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend the duty on certain educational toys and devices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN EDUCATIONAL TOYS AND DEVICES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.85.43      Educational toys    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         and devices                                                        31/2007
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         8543.89.96)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Augustino Biondi, Appellant, v County of Nassau et al., Defendants, and Barneys Hardware, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[853 NYS2d 381]

Generally, liability for injuries sustained as a result of dangerous and defective conditions on public sidewalks is placed on the municipality and not the abutting landowner *(see Hausser v Giunta,*88 NY2d 449, 452-453 [1996]; *Bruno v City of New York,*36 AD3d 640 [2007]). However, an abutting landowner or tenant will be liable to a pedestrian injured by a defect in a sidewalk where the landowner or the tenant negligently constructed or repaired the sidewalk, otherwise caused the defective condition, caused the defect to occur by some special use of the sidewalk, or breached a specific ordinance or statute which obligates the *581owner to maintain the sidewalk *(see Hausser v Giunta,*88 NY2d at 452-453; *Cannizzaro v Simco Mgt. Co.,*26 AD3d 401, 401-402 [2006]; *Packer v City of New York,*282 AD2d 587 [2001]).

Here, the defendants Barneys Hardware, Inc., Donald Katz, and Caroline Katz (hereinafter collectively the defendants) made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence sufficient to demonstrate that none of the elements necessary to impose liability upon an abutting landowner or tenant are present. In response, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Cannizzaro v Simco Mgt. Co.,*26 AD3d at 402).

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to strike his note of issue and certificate of readiness, in effect, in order to depose the defendant Caroline Katz *(see*22 NYCRR 202.21 [e]; *Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v P.M.A. Corp.,*34 AD3d 793, 794 [2006]; *Francis v Board of Educ. of City of Mount Vernon,*278 AD2d 449 [2000]). Rivera, J.P., Ritter, Garni and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Exploration Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas Brady, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




















/s/ Thomas Brady




Thomas Brady


Chief Executive Officer


April 14, 2011











Page - 1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Exploration Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas Brady, Chief Financial Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




















/s/ Thomas Brady




Thomas Brady


Chief Financial Officer


April 14, 2011











Page - 2
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32

       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B) OF THE
                    SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C.1350

The undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63
of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his or her capacity as an officer of Lotus
Bancorp, Inc., that, to his or her knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Lotus
Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such reports fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of Lotus Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary. This written statement is being
furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q.
A signed original of this statement has been provided to Lotus Bancorp, Inc. and
will be retained by Lotus Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: November 13, 2008


/s/ Satish B. Jasti
------------------------------------
Satish B. Jasti
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Richard E. Bauer
------------------------------------
Richard E. Bauer
Chief Financial Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129511 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129511 

 COA: 264257 

Saginaw CC: 01-019930-FC 

DERRICK CONWAY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 24, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). 

s1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

IAN PATRICK HERENS,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 235 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Case 2:11-cr-00165-KSH Document 61 Filed 08/01/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 259
Case 2:11-cr-00165-KSH Document 61 Filed 08/01/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 260
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hostopia.com Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Mugan, Chief Financial of the Company, hereby
certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date: November 14, 2006 | /s/MICHAEL J. MUGANMichael J. Mugan Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------

50

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5027 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5027

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 411 Midway Avenue in Mascotte, Florida, as the ``Specialist Eric 
                         Ramirez Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 8, 2004

Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida (for herself, Mr. Foley, Mr. Boyd, Mr. 
Meek of Florida, Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. 
Hastings of Florida, Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida, Mr. Stearns, and Ms. 
Ros-Lehtinen) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 411 Midway Avenue in Mascotte, Florida, as the ``Specialist Eric 
                         Ramirez Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST ERIC RAMIREZ POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 411 Midway Avenue in Mascotte, Florida, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Specialist Eric Ramirez Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Specialist 
Eric Ramirez Post Office.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Green Standard Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2015, I, Sean Webster, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2015, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2015, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  November 13, 2015

Green Standard Technologies, Inc.



By:/s/ Sean Webster

Sean Webster
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) by ClickSoftware Technologies Ltd. (the "Company"), the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Dr. Moshe BenBassatDr. Moshe BenBassatChief Executive OfficerMarch 29, 2011
(Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3) 

# United Stat es Court of Appeals

For the First C ircuit No. 01-1609 RAUL DE-JESUS, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant, Appellee.
APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. José Antonio Fusté, U.S. District Judge ]
Before Boudin, Chief Judge , Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge , and Lipez, Circuit Judge .

Rafael Colon Flores and Colon Flores Law Firmon brief for appellant. Robert J. Triba , Regional Chief Counsel, Soci al Security Administration, Camille Velez-Rive , Assistant United States Attorney, and H.S. Garcia , U nit ed States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
April 28, 20032

Per Curiam . Raul De Jesus appeals fromthe district court's determination that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security to deny his request for Social S ecu rity disability benefits was supported by substantial evidence. We have reviewed the record, the issues the parties raised in their briefs, and the applicable law, and we discern no reversible error. The district court did not err in its determination that the Commissioner's disability decision -- that De Jesus was not disabledunder th e Soci al Security Act for the insured period because he retained the residual functional capacity to perform the full range of jobs in the medium exertional range -- was supported by substantial evidence and was the result of the proper application of the correct legal s tandar ds. See Seavey v. Barnhart , 276 F.3d 1, 9 (1st Cir. 2001). Th e submitte d medical evidence did not establish that De Jesus was disabled within the meaning of the Act during the covered period. Specifically, the Commissioner did not err in the determination that, although De Jesus was not capable of returning to his past work as a stock clerk, the Medical-Vocatio nal Grids identified other jobs in the national economy which De Jesus could perform. Conce rning De Jesus's request that he be allowed to introduce new evidence not submittedbefore the ALJ, we note that De Jesus has at no point
even produced the medical records on which he seeks a reevaluation of his disability claim. There is thus no reason to remand the3

case for consideration of "evidence" which does not exist in the record. The district court's judgment is AFFIRMED .
#### Xhemal Xhika et al., Respondents, v Trizechahn Regional Pooling, LLC, et al., Defendants, and Chemical Week Associates, LLC, et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[854 NYS2d 449]

*720The injured plaintiff was pulling out a large garbage bag from a bin during the course of his employment as a janitor when he felt pain in his back and fell. The injured plaintiff alleged that the large garbage bag, which consisted of trash that he had collected from cubicle refuse bins of the offices of the defendants Chemical Week Associates, LLC, and Chemical Week Publishing, LLC (hereinafter the defendants), was unusually heavy when he tried to lift it out of the bin. The injured plaintiff alleged that, unbeknownst to him, one of the defendants’ employees must have deposited some heavy trash, which should have been deposited in a hamper in the mail room, into the garbage bag in the bin that he wheeled around to collect garbage from the cubicle refuse bins.

The defendants submitted evidence sufficient to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, and in response, the plaintiffs failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. There was no evidence, only speculation, that the defendants’ employee(s) created the alleged hazardous condition by improperly depositing heavy trash into the garbage bag in the bin that the injured plaintiff wheeled around (see *Gatanas v Picnic Garden B.B.Q. Buffet House,*305 AD2d 457 [2003]; *Goldman v Waldbaum, Inc.,*297 AD2d 277 [2002]; *Licatese v Waldbaums, Inc.,*277 AD2d 429, 430 [2000]; *Sanchez-Acevedo v Mariott Health Care Serv.,*270 AD2d 244 [2000]). The plaintiffs also failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendants had actual or constructive notice of the alleged hazardous condition which proximately caused the injured plaintiff’s injuries (see *generally Gallais-Pradal v YWCA of Brooklyn,*33 AD3d 660 [2006]; *Kraemer v K-Mart Corp.,*226 AD2d 590, 591 [1996]). Rivera, J.P., Skelos, Santucci and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Forgotten  Investments Company,
Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending  December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Daniel
L.  Hodges,  President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.