alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34039-34040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16629]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,209]


Spartan Light Metal Products Including On-Site Leased Workers 
From Defender Services and Manpower, Sparta, IL; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding 
Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 
Trade Adjustment Assistance on April 9, 2009, applicable to workers of 
Spartan Light Metal Products, Sparta, Illinois. The notice will be 
published soon in the Federal Register.
    At the request of the petitioner, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers produce die 
cast parts for automotive and commercial drive train applications.
    New information provided by the petitioner, and confirmed by the 
company official, show that the worker group includes on-site workers 
leased from Defender Services and Manpower.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Spartan Light Metal Products, Inc., Sparta, Illinois, who 
were adversely affected secondary workers.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to 
include on-site workers leased from Defender Services and Manpower.

[[Page 34040]]

    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-65,209 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Spartan Light Metal Products, Inc., including on-
site leased workers from Defender Services and Manpower, who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after February 
9, 2008 through April 9, 2011, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 and are also 
eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under 
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of June 2009.
 Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-16629 Filed 7-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Case 2:11-cr-00134-CCC Document 1 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1
Case 2:11-cr-00134-CCC Document 1 Filed 11/08/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regal Rock, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

   1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:  August 11, 2006


/s/ Bruce Biles
-------------------------------------------
Bruce Biles, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

JUAN R. SIMMONS, :

: Civil Action No. 11-0640 (WJM)

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : ORDER

:

CITY OF PATERSON, et al., :

:

Defendants. :

The Court having received Defendants’ Notice of Removal and

having screened Plaintiff’s Complaint for dismissal pursuant to

1915A and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e, and the Court finding that dismissal

of the Complaint is not warranted at this time,

IT IS on this 14th day of April, 2011,

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file the

Complaint; and it is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), the Clerk

shall serve a copy of this Order by regular mail upon the

Attorney General of the State of New Jersey and the warden of

Passaic County Jail; and it is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2),

Defendants who are served shall file and serve a responsive

pleading within the time specified by Fed.R.Civ.P. 12; and it is

further

ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) and § 4(a)

of Appendix H of the Local Civil Rules, the Clerk shall notify

Plaintiff of the opportunity to apply in writing to the assigned

Case 2:11-cv-00640-KM-MAH Document 7 Filed 04/14/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 23
judge for the appointment of pro bono counsel in accordance with

the factors set forth in Tabron v. Grace, 6 F.3d 147 (3d Cir.

1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1196 (1994), which sets forth the

requirements for eligibility for appointment of pro bono counsel. 

Plaintiff is advised that such appointment is not automatic; and

it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall enclose with such notice a copy

of Appendix H and a form Application for Appointment of Pro Bono

Counsel; and it is further

ORDERED that, if at any time Plaintiff seeks the appointment

of pro bono counsel, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(a) and (d),

Plaintiff shall (1) serve a copy of the application for

Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel by regular mail upon each party

at his last known address or, if the party is represented in this

action by an attorney, upon the party’s attorney and the

attorney’s address, and (2) file a Certificate of Service with

the Application for Pro Bono Counsel.

s/William J. Martini

 

WILLIAM J. MARTINI

United States District Judge

2

Case 2:11-cv-00640-KM-MAH Document 7 Filed 04/14/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 24
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Airspan Networks, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Peter Aronstam, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Peter Aronstam Peter Aronstam Chief Financial Officer March
30, 2004

---
905 A.2d 868

#### IN THE MATTER OF ERIC YIM, A/K/A ERIC CHONG YIM, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 15, 2006.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-078, recommending that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to *Rule*1:20-14(a)(4)(E), ERIC YIM, a/k/a ERIC CHONG YIM, of CENTREVILLE, VIRGINIA, who was admitted to the bar of this. State in 2002, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law pursuant to *Rule*1:20-13(b) since February 17, 2006, should be disbarred;

And the disciplinary action in Virginia that led to the revocation of respondent’s license to practice law in that state having been based on respondent’s guilty plea in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to one count of collection of extensions of credit by extortionate means, in violation of 18 *U.S.C.A.*§ 894(a)(1) and (2);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that the conduct of ERIC YIM, a/k/a ERIC CHONG YIM, constitutes violations of *RPC*8.4(b) (committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer) and *RPC*8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And respondent having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ERIC YIM, a/k/a ERIC CHONG YIM, be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys;

*258ORDERED that ERIC YIM, a/k/a ERIC CHONG YIM, be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a , permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Pinnacle Gas Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending September30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald T. Barnes, Senior Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer and Secretary of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  November14, 2007
|   | /s/ Ronald T. Barnes                   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Ronald T. Barnes                       |
|   | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial |
|   | Officer and Secretary                  |

 

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5028 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5028

 To allow a waiver or exemption of certain requirements for restricted 
                  airspace if security is not reduced.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 8, 2004

  Mrs. Jones of Ohio (for herself, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. Kucinich, Mr. 
Pascrell, and Mr. Strickland) introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow a waiver or exemption of certain requirements for restricted 
                  airspace if security is not reduced.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN RESTRICTED AIR SPACE WAIVER.

    Section 521(a)(2) of the Transportation, Treasury, and Independent 
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2004 (Public Law 108-199, div. F) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (B)(v);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (C) 
        and inserting the following: ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) to allow the operation of an aircraft 
                participating in an air show in restricted airspace if 
                the Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
                Administration, in consultation with the Secretary of 
                the Department of Homeland Security, determines that 
                the safety of an event is not compromised.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.2
 GLG PARTNERS, INC.
2007 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
U.S. RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
 To:
    
    [Name]Date:
    
    [Date]
   Definitions
 Code
 Disability
 Non-Stock Dividends
 Stock Dividends
 Termination of Service provided, that




---



##### 



Earning of Restricted Stock
 provided, that
 
    
    [25%] on ___[Date];
    
    [25%] on ___[Date];
    
    [25%] on ___[Date]; and
    
    [25%] on ___[Date].
   Retention of Certificates for Restricted Stock
  Non-Stock Dividends
  Voting Rights
  2




---



##### 



Delivery of Earned Restricted Stock
  Forfeiture of Unearned Restricted Stock and Stock Dividends
  Transferability
  Withholding
  No Obligation to Register
  3




---



##### 



Restrictive Legends
  Protections Against Violations of Agreement
  Failure to Enforce Not a Waiver
  Survival of Terms
  Counterparts
  Severability
  4




---



##### 



Acceptance
  Applicable Law
  5




---



##### 



GLG PARTNERS, INC.By:Name:
    Noam GottesmanTitle:
    Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer  [Name]Address:Social Security No:




---



##### 



GLG PARTNERS, INC.
 DIVIDEND DIRECT DEPOSIT ENROLLMENT
  checking account enclose a voided personal check
 your savings or other account
 Verification of the deposit will appear on your regular financial
institution account statement




---



##### 



DIRECT DEPOSIT AUTHORIZATION
 Verification of deposit will appear on your
regular financial institution account statement
 Shareholder Account Information
 Print Name(s) on Shareholder Account
    
    Shareholder Signature(s) (if joint all must sign)1
    
    12
    
    2Shareholder Account #
    
    Daytime Telephone # (   )Social Security #
    
    Date
 Financial Institution Information
 checking account enclose a voided check
 Name of Financial institution
    
    Account Number(   ) Checking(   ) SavingsAddress
    
    9-digit ABA Transit/Routing Number        




---



#####
Case 3:10-cv-06308-FLW-LHG Document 10 Filed 06/10/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 63
Case 3:10-cv-06308-FLW-LHG Document 10 Filed 06/10/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 64
Case 3:10-cv-06308-FLW-LHG Document 10 Filed 06/10/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 65
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dave Andrae TAYLOR, a/k/a Indian, a/k/a Nicholas, a/k/a Spike, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-7166.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 29, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 14, 2012.

Dave Andrae Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Robert E. Tro-no, Assistant United States Attorneys, Michael Arlen Jagels, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*297PER CURIAM:

Dave Andrae Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Taylor,*No. 3:99-cr-00145-REP-2 (E.D. Va. June 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
----

> 
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United  States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)  and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of  the undersigned officers of DentalServ.Com, a Nevada corporation (the  "Company"), does hereby certify, [to such officer's knowledge], that:

The Form 10-QSB for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006****  (the "Form *10-QSB*") of the Company fully complies with the requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the  information contained in the Form *10-QSB* fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company.

                     
Dated: November 7, 2006    /s/ Harry Miller**_____________________________** Harry Miller, Acting Chief Executive OfficerDated: November 7, 2006    /s/ Harry Miller**_____________________________** Harry Miller, Acting Chief Financial Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has  been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished  to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
#### In the Matter of Cora P. Nassau County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Ann P., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Ola P. Nassau County Depart*651ment of Social Services, Respondent; Ann P., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[852 NYS2d 806]

The petitioner Nassau County Department of Social Services demonstrated by clear and convincing proof *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [3] [g]) that the mother is presently, and will be for the foreseeable future, unable by reason of mental illness to provide proper and adequate care for the subject children *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [c]; *Matter of Amanda Ann B.,*38 AD3d 537, 538 [2007]; *Matter of Imelda R.,*32 AD3d 519, 520-521 [2006]; *Matter of Lina Catalina R.,*21 AD3d 563, 564 [2005]; *Matter of Harlem Dowling-Westside Ctr. for Children & Family Servs. v Marion L.C.,*264 AD2d 845 [1999]).

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Spolzino, J.P., Angiolillo, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
|   | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q      for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies      with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 9, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Ronald E. Pipoly,    Jr.                |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Ronald      E. Pipoly, Jr.                       |
|                        |   | Chief      Financial Officer                     |
|                        |   | (Principal      Financial and AccountingOfficer) |

----
#### Philip R. Totonelly, *Jr.,*Appellant, v Heather L. Enos, Respondent.

[853 NYS2d 886]

*711The plaintiff brought this action to determine the sum he owed to the defendant pursuant to a written agreement between the parties, and the defendant interposed a counterclaim for a sum allegedly owed based on the parties’ oral and written agreements. Where, as here, a nonjury trial is involved, this Court’s power to review the evidence is as broad as that of the trial court, bearing in mind that due regard must be given to the trial court, which was in a position to assess the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses *(see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford,*60 NY2d 492 [1983]; *Vizzari v Hernandez,*1 AD3d 431 [2003]).

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the trial court’s determination awarding judgment in favor of the defendant in the principal sum of $68,550 is warranted by the facts.

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Lifson, J.P., Ritter, Florio and Garni, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Market Integrity,  Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Daniel L.  Hodges,
President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tianyin Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dr. Guoqing Jiang, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.   Date:  June 6, 2008  /s/  Dr. Guoqing Jiang Dr. Guoqing Jiang, Chief Executive Officer & Acting Chief Financial Officer