alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Certification of

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Samuel L. Westover, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sonic Innovations, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007:



| | (1) | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sonic Innovations, Inc.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 17, 2008



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ SAMUEL L. WESTOVER               
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)        

I, Michael M. Halloran, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sonic Innovations, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007:



| | (1) | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sonic Innovations, Inc.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 17, 2008



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL M. HALLORAN      
|Vice President and           
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the report of Ridgewood Energy T Fund, LLC (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund. 

| Dated: | August 7, 2007 | RIDGEWOOD ENERGY T FUND,   LLC |
|--------|----------------|--------------------------------|
|   |           |                           |   |
|   |           | By:                            | /s/ ROBERT E. SWANSON |
|   |           |                           |  |
|   |           | Name:                          | Robert E. Swanson |
|   |           | Title:                         | President and Chief   Executive Officer |
|   |           |                           | (Principal Executive   Officer) |
|   |           |                           |   |
| Dated: | August 7, 2007 |                           |   |
|   |           |                           |   |
|   |           | By:                            | /s/ KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY |
|   |           |                           |  |
|   |           | Name:                          | Kathleen P. McSherry |
|   |           | Title:                         | Senior Vice President and   Chief Financial Officer |
|   |           |                           | (Principal Financial and   Accounting Officer) |

A signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to Ridgewood Energy T Fund, LLC and will be retained by Ridgewood Energy T Fund, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

22
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
              SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DoMark International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Scott Sieck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

                                DoMark International, Inc.
                                      Registrant


Date: January 14, 2010          By: /s/ Scott Sieck
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Scott Sieck
                                    Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Scherne, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Quarterly Report of Dentalserv.com on Form 10- QSB, for the
quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Dentalserv.com


/s/  Robert Scherne
-----------------------------------
Robert Scherne
Chief Financial Officer
Dentalserv.com

November 13, 2007
# Table 1400. cusize
U.S. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL 

The Mainframe Applications 

Re-platform Initiative at the 

Railroad Retirement Board is 

Progressing in Accordance with 

Established Project Goals 

Report No. 19-11 September 26, 2019

This report summary presents the abbreviated results of the 

subject audit. The full report includes information protected from 

disclosure and has been designated for limited distribution 

pursuant to 5 U. S. C. § 552.
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

U.S. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

The Mainframe Applications Re-platform Initiative at the Railroad Retirement Board

is Progressing in Accordance with Established Project Goals

Report Summary September 26, 2019 Report No. 19-11

What DP George & Company Found

“DP George & Company, LLC (DPG) audited the Railroad 

Retirement Board (RRB) Mainframe Applications Re-platform 

information technology against: strategic and project 

management plans maintained by the agency, Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) information technology 

planning guidance, and other best practice guidance for project 

management.” 

RRB received $10 million in appropriation for mission critical 

information technology investments. RRB hired a contractor to 

perform the transition from older technology, such as the 

mainframe re-platform project assessed in this audit.

DP George determined the current status for the Mainframe 

Applications Re-Platform initiative, assessed that project plans 

and progress through May 31, 2019 were reasonable to achieve 

success for the project, and assessed that the RRB goals for the 

project are reasonable and attainable.

DP George did not make any recommendations. This audit was 

conducted while the project was in progress and it is not 

intended to assess the implementation of the project. Only 

Phase I of the four phases has been completed as of the scope 

period. DP George determined that Phase II was on schedule for 

completion at the time of report issuance.

What We Did

The Office of Inspector General 

(OIG) for the Railroad Retirement 

Board (RRB) engaged DPG to 

conduct a performance audit. The 

audit objectives were: (1) 

determine the current status of the 

RRB project titled “Mainframe 

Applications Re-platform”; (2) 

evaluate if the project plans and 

progress to date are reasonable to 

achieve success; and (3) evaluate if 

the goals for Mainframe 

Re-Platform are reasonable and 

attainable. This audit was 

conducted in accordance with the 

performance audit standards 

established by Generally Accepted 

Government Auditing Standards.

DPG is responsible for the audit 

report and the conclusions 

expressed therein. RRB OIG does 

not express any assurance on the 

conclusions presented in DPG’s 

audit report.

The scope of this audit is project 

activities performed at the RRB 

from project award on 

February 1, 2019 through 

May 31, 2019.
Exhibit 10.32

June  30,  2006

John W. Henry & Company, Inc.301 Yamato Road, Suite 2200Boca Raton, Fl. 33431-4931

Attn: Mr.  Ken Webster

Re:    Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Mr. Webster:

We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the ‘‘Management Agreements’’). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June  30,  2007 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

|  |              |                                |
|--|--------------|--------------------------------|
|  | •  | Shearson Mid-West Futures Fund |

|  |              |                                                   |
|--|--------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|  | •  | Shearson Lehman Select Advisors Futures Fund L.P. |

|  |              |                                            |
|--|--------------|--------------------------------------------|
|  | •  | Smith Barney Mid-West Futures Fund L.P. II |

|  |              |                                         |
|--|--------------|-----------------------------------------|
|  | •  | Smith Barney Westport Futures Fund L.P. |

|  |              |                                                  |
|--|--------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|  | •  | Hutton Investors Futures Fund, L.P. II (HIFF II) |

|  |              |             |
|--|--------------|-------------|
|  | •  | AURORA 2001 |

|  |              |            |
|--|--------------|------------|
|  | •  | AURORA III |

|  |              |                                                         |
|--|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|  | •  | Salomon Smith Barney Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. |

|  |              |                         |
|--|--------------|-------------------------|
|  | •  | Citibank NA (Alera 100) |

|  |              |                                          |
|--|--------------|------------------------------------------|
|  | •  | JWH Strategic Allocation Master Fund LLC |

|  |              |                                    |
|--|--------------|------------------------------------|
|  | •  | Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund |

|  |              |                                        |
|--|--------------|----------------------------------------|
|  | •  | CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio LP |

Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr.  Daniel  McAuliffe at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-559-5043.

Very truly yours,

CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC

By:    /s/  Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.

Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.        Chief Financial Officer & Director

JOHN W. HENRY & COMPANY, INC.

By:    /s/ Kenneth S. Webster

Print Name:  Kenneth S. Webster

DRMcA/sr

----
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 of
ZipGlobal Holdings, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q (collectively,
the “Report”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Michael
C. Lee, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:





1.    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: February
      13, 2009
            
            /s/ Michael C. LeeMichael
      C. Lee
              President
              (Principal Executive Officer)
              (Principal Financial and
      Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 132 (Monday, July 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16406]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11778 and <greek-i>11779]


Alaska Disaster Number AK-00016

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Alaska 
(FEMA-1843-DR), dated 06/11/2009.
    Incident: Flooding and ice jams.
    Incident Period: 04/28/2009 through 05/31/2009.

Effective Date:
    07/01/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 08/10/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/11/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Alaska, dated 06/11/2009, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Lower Yukon REAA (32), Yukon-Koyukuk REAA (52).

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-16406 Filed 7-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of JPG Associates, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Greeley, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ John P. Greeley John P. Greeley Title: President and Chief Financial Officer   August 14, 2007
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**          I, Emmanuel Roman, Co-Chief Executive Officer of GLG Partners, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:     (1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: May 9, 2008                                                              /s/ Emmanuel Roman   Emmanuel Roman   Co-Chief Executive Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

T.S., a child

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1761

[ February 21, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; James L. Martz , Judge; L.T. Case No. 17CJ000494AMB

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B

. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P.

Picard, Assistant Attorney Gene ral, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER

, D AMOORGIAN and L EVINE , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1

The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-1283

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Clarence Stevens, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 4, 2008 

 Filed: January 22, 2008

___________

Before BYE, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Clarence Stevens (Stevens) appeals the 60-month’s imprisonment the district

court1

 imposed after this court remanded for resentencing. See United States v.

Wintermute, 443 F.3d 993 (8th Cir. 2006). Stevens argues (1) the government should

not have been allowed to present evidence at the resentencing hearing, and (2) his

sentence violates the Sixth Amendment, because the sentencing enhancements he

received were based on facts not found by a jury or admitted by him. 
-2-

We conclude (1) the law-of-the-case doctrine required the district court to

follow this court’s mandate to allow the government to present evidence at

resentencing, giving all parties a full resentencing hearing; and (2) Stevens has not

shown that the law of the case should not apply here. See United States v. Huber, 462

F.3d 945, 953 (8th Cir. 2006) (declaring the law of the case requires a trial court to

follow the decision of the appellate court with respect to all issues addressed by the

opinion); United States v. Bartsh, 69 F.3d 864, 866 (8th Cir. 1995) (explaining the law

of the case prevents relitigation of settled issues and requires courts to adhere to

decisions made in earlier proceedings to ensure uniformity, protect expectations, and

promote judicial economy); United States v. Callaway, 972 F.2d 904, 905 (8th Cir.

1992) (per curiam) (stating the law of the case should be followed unless a party

“introduces substantially different evidence, or [the] prior decision is clearly

erroneous and works manifest injustice”). 

We further conclude Stevens’s sentence does not violate the Sixth Amendment

because there is no indication the district court viewed the Guidelines as mandatory.

See United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 233-37, 245, 258-59 (2005) (concluding

the Sixth Amendment problem resulting from the mandatory nature of the Guidelines

is remedied by making the Guidelines advisory); United States v. Salter, 418 F.3d 860,

862 (8th Cir. 2005) (ruling, after Booker, the district court may enhance a sentence

based on judge-found facts if the court views the Guidelines as advisory). 

Steven argues in his brief the “increase in the offense level in the case at bar

skews the ‘reasonableness’ analysis.” We further review the sentence for

reasonableness, finding no abuse of discretion by the district court, and conclude the

sentence is not unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, __ U.S. __, 128 S. Ct. 586,

596-97; Rita v. United States, __ U.S. __ 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462 (2007); and Booker,

543 U.S. at 261.

We affirm.

______________________________
EX-10.B



 Exhibit 10(b) 
 ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Assignment Agreement (“Assignment”), entered
into by and among Northwest Pipeline Services LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignor”), and Williams WPC-I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”), is effective as of January 1, 2013 (the
“Effective Date”). 
 RECITALS 
 A. WHEREAS, Northwest Pipeline GP, a Delaware general partnership, and Assignor are parties to an Administrative Services Agreement dated October 1, 2007 (the “Agreement”). 

B. WHEREAS, pursuant to an organizational restructuring of The Williams Companies, Inc. and its affiliates, employees of Assignor ceased
to be employees of Assignor and became employees solely of Assignee on the Effective Date. 
 Assignor and Assignee hereto agree as follows:

 ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION 
 1. Assignment. Assignor hereby assigns to Assignee all rights, obligations, and other interests in and under the Agreement. 
 2. Assumption. Assignee shall assume and be responsible for all of Assignor’s rights, obligations, and other interests in and under the Agreement, including, but not limited to, any rights or
obligations arising before the Effective Date. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Assignment to be
executed by their duly authorized representatives on February 13, 2013. 
  

									
	 ASSIGNOR:
  

Northwest Pipeline Services LLC
	 		 	 ASSIGNEE:
  

Williams WPC-I, LLC

					
	By:	 	/s/ Allison G. Bridges	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/ Stephanie C. Cipolla
		 	 Allison G. Bridges
 Vice
President
	 		 		 	 Stephanie C. Cipolla

President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Terrance Pair, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 722]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 20, 2000 *(People v Pair,*277 AD2d 401 [2000]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 26, 1998.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, EJ., Florio, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.