alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 1 of 29 PageID: 2712
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 2 of 29 PageID: 2713
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 3 of 29 PageID: 2714
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 4 of 29 PageID: 2715
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 5 of 29 PageID: 2716
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 6 of 29 PageID: 2717
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 7 of 29 PageID: 2718
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 8 of 29 PageID: 2719
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 9 of 29 PageID: 2720
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 10 of 29 PageID: 2721
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 11 of 29 PageID: 2722
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 12 of 29 PageID: 2723
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 13 of 29 PageID: 2724
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 14 of 29 PageID: 2725
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 15 of 29 PageID: 2726
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 16 of 29 PageID: 2727
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 17 of 29 PageID: 2728
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 18 of 29 PageID: 2729
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 19 of 29 PageID: 2730
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 20 of 29 PageID: 2731
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 21 of 29 PageID: 2732
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 22 of 29 PageID: 2733
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 23 of 29 PageID: 2734
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 24 of 29 PageID: 2735
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 25 of 29 PageID: 2736
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 26 of 29 PageID: 2737
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 27 of 29 PageID: 2738
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 28 of 29 PageID: 2739
Case 2:11-cv-01874-DRD-MCA Document 116 Filed 02/14/12 Page 29 of 29 PageID: 2740
# covid_table18_q6_size_class
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1233 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1233

To provide relief to community banks, to promote access to capital for 
                community banks, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 30, 2019

  Mr. Rounds introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide relief to community banks, to promote access to capital for 
                community banks, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Bank Access to Capital Act 
of 2019''.

SEC. 2. INTERNAL CONTROL ATTESTATION REQUIREMENT EXEMPTIONS.

    Section 404(c) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 
7262(c)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``that is neither'' and inserting the 
        following: ``that--
            ``(1) is neither'';
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``; 
        or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) is an insured depository institution or a depository 
        institution holding company (as those terms are defined in 
        section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 
        1813)) with less than $5,000,000,000 in total consolidated 
        assets.''.

SEC. 3. ANNUAL REPORT ON FINANCIAL CONDITION AND MANAGEMENT.

    Section 36(a)(1) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 
1831m(a)(1)) is amended by inserting ``that has more than 
$5,000,000,000 in total consolidated assets'' after ``institution''.

SEC. 4. REGULATION D.

    (a) Definition of Accredited Investors.--Not later than 180 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Securities and Exchange 
Commission shall amend section 230.501(a)(5)(i)(A) of title 17, Code of 
Federal Regulations, to read as follows:
                    ``(A) The person's primary residence shall be 
                included as an asset;''.
    (b) Limitation on Number of Purchasers.--Not later than 180 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Securities and Exchange 
Commission shall amend section 230.506(b)(2)(i) of title 17, Code of 
Federal Regulations, to read as follows:
                            ``(i) Limitation on number of purchasers.--
                        There are no more than or the issuer reasonably 
                        believes that there are no more than 70 
                        purchasers of securities from the issuer in any 
                        offering under this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
Jnvps F. MAnt¡¡rs.

KELLIH. TODD

LAcYL. L¡ouRRn

MlRrrxs, ToDD, LnoNtnn, T^lYlon & Aslnrcn

A GENERAL P,qRTUERSHTP

301 CoNGRESSAVENUE, Sutre 1950

AUSTIN, TEXAS 7870I

(st2) s42-98e8

FAx(512) 542-9899

www.textaxla\il.com

Avm¡on G. TAvlon

D.axrsr,Le V, Aru,RIcn

ALLEGRAD, HILL

Attorneys at Law Attorneys at Law

*Board Certified in Tax Law

Texæ Board ofLegal Specialization

E-MAIL: ataylor@textaxlaw.com

July 27,2oLs

Via Electronic Filing

Court of Appeals, Third District of Texas

Attn: Jeffrey Kyle, Clerk

Price Daniel Sr. Building

2o9 West r4tt' Street, Room tot

Austin, Texas 787ot

Re: Court of Appeals Number: o3-14-oo7B-CV

Trial Court Number: D-r-GN-12-oo1g16

Glenn Hegar, et aL u. CGG Veritas Seraices (U.5.), Inc.

Dear Mr. Kyle:

Please be advised that I will be out of the office for a professional

commitment from October L2-rg,2o1b. Accordingly, I respectfully request

that the Court not schedule oral argument in the above-referenced matter

on October t4, 2o1S. Should you have any questions or need any

additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for

your attention to this matter.

ACCEPTED

03-14-00713-CV

6243354

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

7/27/2015 5:24:45 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/27/2015 5:24:45 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Third Court of Appeals

July 27,2015

Page2

AGT: san

Sincerely

By:

Amanda G. Taylor

cc: Joseph D. Hughes, via electronic mail

Charles Eldred, via electronic mail
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT 

MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, and 

OCEAN NAVIGATOR EXPRESS LINE,

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

BROOKS FITCH APPAREL GROUP, LLC,

and JOSEPH E. SAFDIEH, 

Defendants. 

Case No.: 11-cv-1921 (ES)(JSA) 

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION 

The court has ordered that: 

The plaintiff Ocean Navigator Express Line recover from the defendants Brooks Fitch Apparel 

Group, LLC and/or Joseph E. Safdieh the amount of Four Million, One Hundred Ninety-Five 

Thousand and Six Dollars and Fifty Cents ($4,195,006.50), plus prejudgment interest in the 

amount of Seven Hundred Nineteen Thousand, Four Hundred Seventy One Dollars and Fifty 

Nine Cents ($719,471.59) for a total recovery amounting to Four Million, Nine Hundred 

Fourteen Thousand, Four Hundred Seventy Eight Dollars and Nine Cents ($4,914,478.09); and, 

The plaintiff Ocean Navigator Express Line shall also recover from the defendants Brooks Fitch 

Apparel Group, LLC and/or Joseph E. Safdieh post-judgment interest at a rate of 1.79% to be 

applied only to the judgment of $4,195,006.50 which is to be compounded annually and which 

will accrue from August 14, 2019 until the date of payment. 

Case 2:11-cv-01921-ES-JSA Document 251 Filed 01/06/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 8837
2

This action was: 

Tried by Judge Jose L. Linares without a jury and a decision holding the defendant Brooks Fitch 

Apparel Group, LLC liable to the plaintiff Ocean Navigator Express Line for the sum of 

$4,155,006.50 was reached on April 26, 2018; 

Decided by Jose L. Linares on a motion and the above decision holding the defendant Brooks 

Fitch Apparel Group, LLC liable to the plaintiff Ocean Navigator Express Line for the additional 

sum of $40,000.00 for an amount now totaling $4,195,006.50 was reached on October 12, 2018; 

Decided by Judge Esther Salas on a motion and the above decision holding that the plaintiff 

Ocean Navigator Express Line could recover the judgment against defendant Brooks Fitch 

Apparel Group, LLC for the sum of $4,195,006.50 from the defendant Joseph E. Safdieh by 

piercing the corporate veil was reached on August 14, 2019; and, 

Decided by Judge Esther Salas on a motion and the above decision holding that the defendants 

Brooks Fitch Apparel Group, LLC and/or Joseph E. Safdieh were liable to the plaintiff Ocean 

Navigator Express Line for the additional sum of prejudgment interest in the amount of 

$719,471.59 was reached on September 14, 2020; and, 

Decided by Judge Esther Salas on a motion and the above decision holding that the plaintiff 

Ocean Navigator Express Line shall also recover from the defendants Brooks Fitch Apparel 

Group, LLC and/or Joseph E. Safdieh post-judgment interest at a rate of 1.79% to be applied to 

the judgment of $4,195,006.50 which is to be compounded annually and which will accrue from 

August 14, 2019 until the date of payment was reached on September 14, 2020. 

Case 2:11-cv-01921-ES-JSA Document 251 Filed 01/06/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 8838
Case 2:11-cv-01921-ES-JSA Document 251 Filed 01/06/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 8839
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

SUSAN JACOBSON, et al., : Civil Action No. 11-1160 (AET) 

:

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. : SCHEDULING ORDER

:

SYNTHES, INC., et al., : 

:

Defendants. :

_________________________________________ :

 

This matter having come before the Court during a telephone status 

conference on June 22, 2012; and the Court having conferred with counsel concerning the

timely completion of expert discovery; and good cause appearing for the entry of the within

Order;

IT IS on this 25 day of June 2012, th

ORDERED THAT:

1. The Parties advise that fact discovery is complete.

2. Counsel will confer in an attempt to resolve any discovery or case

management disputes before making such dispute the subject of a motion. No discovery

motion will be entertained absent counsel's full compliance with L. CIV. R. 37.1(a)(1); see also

L. CIV. R. 16.1(f). Any unresolved dispute, must be brought to the Court’s attention

immediately by letter to the undersigned.

3. The time within which Plaintiffs may serve copies of any affirmative expert

disclosures and reports is further extended to July 20, 2012.

4. Defendants shall serve copies of any rebuttal expert disclosures and reports

by August 20, 2012.

5. Expert depositions must be completed by September 20, 2012.

6. No expert shall testify at the time of trial as to any opinions, nor base those

opinions on facts, not substantially disclosed in any report as described in the preceding

paragraphs.

7. The Court will conduct a telephone status conference on September 11, 2012

at 3:00 P.M. Defendants’ counsel will initiate this call.

8. Any dispositive motioms must be filed by October 12, 2012.

Case 3:11-cv-01160-AET-DEA Document 18 Filed 06/25/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 97
9. The Court may, from time to time, schedule conferences as may be required,

either on its own motion or at the request of counsel. Failure to appear at subsequent

conferences, or to comply with any of the terms of this Order, may result in sanctions.

10. Since all dates set forth herein are established with the assistance and

knowledge of counsel, there will be no further extensions except for good cause shown and by

leave of the Court, even with consent of all counsel.

s/ Douglas E. Arpert 

DOUGLAS E. ARPERT

United States Magistrate Judge

ALL PROPOSED ORDERS AND LETTER MEMORANDA SENT TO CHAMBERS

SHOULD BE IN WORDPERFECT FORMAT AND E-MAILED TO:

dea_orders@njd.uscourts.gov. ANY FILINGSWITH THE CLERK’S OFFICE SHOULD BE

IN PDF FORMAT.

Case 3:11-cv-01160-AET-DEA Document 18 Filed 06/25/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 98
Case 1:11-cv-02323-NLH-AMD Document 3 Filed 08/25/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 21
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Howard M. Averill, certify
that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the annual
report on Form 10-K of Time Warner Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |        |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 27, 2018 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Howard M. Averill
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Name:  |  | Howard M. Averill      
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |        |  | Time Warner Inc.
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gulf & Orient Steamship Company, Ltd. (the Registrant) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Michael Vardakis, President and Melissa Ladakis, Secretary/Treasurer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:11/7/07By:/s/Michael VardakisMichael VardakisPresident and DirectorDate:11/14/07By:/s/Melissa LadakisMelissa LadakisSecretary, Treasurer and Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1740

MANUELA HOLMES, f/k/a Manuela Moore,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MORGAN H. MOORE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District 

Judge. (3:13-cv-01254-TLW)

Submitted: January 29, 2015 Decided: February 12, 2015

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian C. Gambrell, HAMILTON & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellant. Stephanie R. Fajardo, THE FAJARDO LAW 

FIRM, LLC, Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Manuela Holmes appeals from the district court’s order 

dismissing her action for breach of contract and promissory 

estoppel against her former husband, Morgan H. Moore. The 

district court premised its dismissal on lack of subject matter 

jurisdiction, applying the domestic relations exception to 

diversity jurisdiction. Holmes contends that her claims are not 

barred by the domestic relations exception because, she claims, 

the property settlement agreement that she seeks to enforce does 

not involve issues related to the divorce decree; the settlement 

agreement is a contract on its own terms subject to contract law 

of South Carolina; and the court erred in failing to grant her 

summary judgment (although she did not move for summary 

judgment) because there were no remaining issues of fact.

We review legal questions, including the breadth of a 

district court’s jurisdiction, de novo. Simmons v. United 

Mortg. & Loan Inv., LLC, 634 F.3d 754, 762 (4th Cir. 2011). We 

have reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Holmes v. Moore, No. 3:13-cv-01254-TLW 

(D.S.C. June 23, 2014).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
APPLICANT STEVEN DWAYNE GILBERT APPLICATION NO. WR-17.545-21

APPLICATION FOR 11.07 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ACTION TAKEN

DISMISSED, SUBSEQUENT APPLICATION. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 11.07, § 4(a)-

(c).

1 1 03 fori 1<T

JUDGE DATE
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





I, Kyle Kennedy, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Seafarer Exploration Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”):





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated March 31, 2015





/s/ Kyle KennedyKyle KennedyChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer and acting Principal Accounting Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CAMDEN VICINAGE

HONORABLE ROBERT B. KUGLER

 

 :

 : Civil No. 97-5127(RBK)

(In Re Bayside Litigation) :

 : 

LUIS MEJIAS, : ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

 : MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT, NEW

 Plaintiff, : TRIAL OR REMITTITUR

 : 

 v. : 

 :

SCOTT FAUNCE : 

 :

 Defendant. :

 : 

 

THIS MATTER HAVING come before the court upon the motions of defendant

Scott Faunce for Judgment, New Trial or Remittitur, and the court having considered the papers

submitted and for the reasons expressed in an Opinion file concurrently with this Order,

IT IS ON THIS 29th day of August, 2007, ORDERED that the Motions for

Judgment, New Trial or Remittitur by defendant Scott Faunce, be and are hereby DENIED.

s/Robert B. Kugler 

ROBERT B. KUGLER

United States District Judge

Case 1:97-cv-05127-RBK-JS Document 939 Filed 08/29/07 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 7058
Case 1:97-cv-05127-RBK-JS Document 939 Filed 08/29/07 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 7059
----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                       |   |                               |
|----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|                       |   |                               |   |
| Date:      August 14, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Yin      Wang             |   |
|                       |   | Yin      Wang                      |   |
|                       |   | Chief      Executive Officer  |   |
|                       |   | (Principal      Executive Officer) |   |
|                       |   |                               |   |
EX-10.12



 Exhibit 10.12 
 BJ’S RESTAURANTS, INC. 
 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT CERTIFICATE 
 (2012 Gold Standard Stock Ownership Program) 
 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that BJ’s
Restaurants, Inc., a California corporation (the “COMPANY”), has offered you (the “GRANTEE”) the right to receive restricted stock units (“RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS” or “AWARD”) under the terms of its Gold
Standard Stock Ownership Program (“GSSOP”) promulgated under the Company’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the “PLAN”) on the terms set forth below. 

 

			
	Name of Grantee:	  	Address of Grantee:
		  	
		  	
		  	
		  	
		  	

 Number of Shares: 
 Offer Grant Date: 
 Vesting Schedule: 

 

					
	 Vesting Period
	  	Award
Percentage
Vesting at
End of
Vesting
Period	 
		
	 Grant Date through 3rd Year Anniversary of Grant Date
	  	 	33	% 
	 Grant Date through 5th Year Anniversary of Grant Date
	  	 	67	% 

 By your electronic authorization, you and the Company agree to be bound by all of the terms and conditions of the
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, the 2012 GSSOP and the Plan (all of which are incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full in this document). By executing this Certificate, you hereby irrevocably elect to accept the Restricted
Stock Units rights granted pursuant to this Certificate and the related Restricted Stock Unit Agreement and to receive the Award of Restricted Stock Units designated above subject to the terms of this Certificate, the GSSOP, the Plan and the Award
Agreement. 
  

			
	BJ’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
		
	By:	 	
		 	  

		
		 	Jerry Deitchle, Chief Executive Officer and President
Exhibit 10.8

January 11, 2008                         Re: Service about being independent director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of China Pharma Holdings, Inc                         Dear Mr. Baowen Dong                         On behalf of the Board of Directions and the Company, I am pleased to welcome you to join the Board of the China Pharma Holdings, Inc as an independent director and a member of the Audit Committee. I look forward to working with you. Your starting date will be the date of the board approves your engagement and your engagement for this term will end on the date of the next annual shareholders meeting.                         Your compensation will consist of the following:
|  | 1)      | A retainer of RMB 40,000 per year, payable quarterly within 5 days of the start of the quarter. |
|--|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

If you agree to the terms and conditions stated above, please sign and date this letter below.                         I look forward to working with you and sincerely hope that your service will be enjoyable and rewarding.                         Sincerely             

Chairman of the Board            China Pharma Holdings, Inc                                      Response:            This letter correctly sets forth the understanding of Mr. Baowen Dong.

 
| By:   |  |  |
|-------|--|--|
| Date: |  |  |
Case 1:11-cv-00191-JHR-AMD Document 12 Filed 06/07/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 48