alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, Roger Gordon, Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Executive Officer of Pure Pharmaceuticals Corp. (the Company),
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
      period ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                               

Date: August 23, 2010

/s/ Roger Gordon Roger GordonChief Executive
Officer and Principal Executive Officer

---
|   | (a) | our periodic report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Form 10-K/A”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related interpretations; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and our results of operations. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Gerald D. Schiefelbein |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|
|   | Gerald D. Schiefelbein     |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer    |   |
|   |                       |   |
| Date:  | March 27, 2013             |   |

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 130 (Thursday, July 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 32931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16171]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 11:55 a.m. on 
Thursday, July 2, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider a matter 
related to the Corporation's corporate, supervisory, and resolution 
activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice 
Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, seconded by Director John E. Bowman 
(Acting Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), concurred in by 
Director John C. Dugan (Comptroller of the Currency), Director Thomas 
J. Curry (Appointive), and Chairman Sheila C. Bair, that Corporation 
business required its consideration of the matter which was to be the 
subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; 
that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public 
interest did not require consideration of the matter in a meeting open 
to public observation; and that the matter could be considered in a 
closed meeting by authority of subsection (c)(9)(B) of the ``Government 
in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550--17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

    Dated: July 6, 2009.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-16171 Filed 7-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
#### LEHRMAN v. BABOR et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

March 4, 1949.

Olesker & Silvan, New York City, Louis Zingesser, Mamaroneck, N. Y., and Abel M. Silvan, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiff.

Hays, St. John, Abramson & Schulman, New York City, John Schulman and William Klein, II, New York City, of counsel, for defendant Babor.

CONGER, District Judge.

Motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12 (b)(1), Federal Rides of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

Although there are no allegations in the complaint that plaintiff is the owner of a copyright or has equitable title to one, the allegations suggest that he may have a basis for an equitable title. If he has such a title that, of course, would give this Court jurisdiction.

I have read the complaint herein with a great deal of care. I am not too sure that plaintiff has, on the pleaded facts, a claim which he can establish under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. There can be no question from reading the prayer for relief that he bases his claim upon a Federal question arising under the Copyright Act. Plaintiff will have to stand or fall upon this claim.

This motion may be made at any time, or may be discovered by the Court, and I, therefore, feel that the trial judge *110will be in a better position to decide it after he has heard some of the evidence to be presented.

Motion denied.

Settle order.
#### CAMPBELL v. AMERICAN FABRICS CO.

No. 2883.

District Court, E. D. New York.

Feb. 18, 1943.

Silver & Bernstein, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Frederick S. Duncan, of New York City, for defendant.

BYERS, District Judge.

Motion by defendant pursuant to Rule 3D(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, that certain depositions be not taken for the reason that depositions taken in a previous cause between the parties have rendered these unnecessary.

Apparently this is an action for a declaratory judgment concerning a contract of February 13, 1939, or for a reformation thereof, under which the defendant is said to be obligated to acquire the plaintiff’s stock in Woodstock Spinning Corporation.

While the issues may not be precisely those heretofore litigated, they are sufficiently similar to require that the testimony now to be taken shall not he repetitious of what has already been adduced.

Accordingly the motion will be granted to this extent:

The witness Lasher is to be examined according to plaintiff’s notice.

The witness Wheeler is to be examined:

(a) With respect to the stock agreement dated February 13, 1939.

(b) With respect to the alleged misrepresentations attributed to plaintiff by defendant prior to and concerning the said agreement.

(c) With respect to the consideration for the issue of the said stock to the plaintiff only, not the consideration for the issue of the defendant’s 51% of the said stock.

The witness Phillips is to be examined:

(a) With respect to the making of the agreements of February 13, 1939, both stock and operating.

He has been sufficiently examined heretofore as to the alleged misrepresentations attributed by defendant to plaintiff; and what has been said with reference to the witness Wheeler with respect to the consideration for the issue of plaintiff’s stock would apply to this witness, had he not already been examined on that subject on October 17, 1938. In view of that testimony, this witness’ deposition will be confined to the paragraph (a) above.

As to the witness Kohler, it is understood that the notice has been withdrawn.

Settle order.
Supplementary Agreement on the Exclusive OEM Production Agreement
and the Extension of the Original Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “the Supplementary Agreement”)


 


Party A: Greatmat Technology (Hong Kong)
Limited (hereinafter referred to as “Party A”)


Party B: Yunfu City Yuncheng District Changyi
Stone Plant (hereinafter referred to as “Party B”)


Party C: Greatmat Holdings Limited (a company
incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, hereinafter referred to as “Party C”)


 


All terms of this agreement, unless otherwise
specified, have the same definitions with the original exclusive OEM production agreement (hereinafter referred to as "the
Original Agreement") signed between Party A and Party B on June 30, 2004.


 


In view of there are areas not entirely
resolved in the Original Agreement, Party A and Party B, in line with principles of mutual benefit and friendly consultations,
hereby enter into a Supplementary Agreement:


 


Supplementary Agreement:


1. If Party A, or its subsidiary(ies) fails
to place orders in accordance with Clause 2.10 of the Original Agreement, Party A must indemnify Party B from the effective date
of the Original Agreement.


2. In view of Party C is the holding company
of Party A, all compensation to be borne by Party C.


3. If Partly C or its holding company be
successfully listed and the related fund raised is not less than US$ 20 million, the compensation clause in 2.10 of the Original
Agreement will be exempted.


4. The Original Agreement covering the period from 1 July, 2004
to 30 June, 2009, will be extending for a 5-year period ending 30 June, 2014.


 


This Supplementary Agreement shall become an integral part of
the Original Agreement and has the same legal effect.


 


Except as expressly modified by the provisions
in this agreement, the terms and conditions of rest of the Original Agreement. shall be fully remained in force.


 



    	 



    	 



    
 


Party A: Greatmat Technology (Hong Kong) Limited


Legal person representative: Mr So Yun Sang, Chris


Address: Room 3202-03, 32/F., No. 148 Electric Road, North Point,
Hong Kong.


Contact: Person: Mr. So Yun Sang, Chris


Telephone: (852) 2891-2111




Party B: Yunfu City Yuncheng District Changyi Stone Plant


Legal person representative: Mr Tsang Hin Yick


Address: Hekou Stone Industrial Park in Yun Cheng District,
Yunfu City,


Guangdong Province, China.


Contact: Person: Mr Tsang Hin Yick


Telephone: (0766) 8211-288


 


Party C: Greatmat Holdings Limited


Legal person representative: Mr So Yun Sang, Chris


Address: Room 3202-03, 32/F., No. 148 Electric Road, North Point,
Hong Kong.


Contact: Person: Mr. So Yun Sang, Chris


Telephone: (852) 2891-2111


 


Agreement date: 30 December, 2011
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4999 

To repeal the provisions of law making reemployed annuitants ineligible for 

physicians comparability allowances under title 5, United States Code, 

and special pay for physicians and dentists under title 38, United States 

Code. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2004 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal the provisions of law making reemployed annuitants ineligible for physicians comparability allowances 

under title 5, United States Code, and special pay for 

physicians and dentists under title 38, United States 

Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROVISIONS REPEALED. 

4 (a) PHYSICIANS COMPARABILITY ALLOWANCES.— 

5 Section 5948(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amend6 ed— 
2 

•HR 4999 IH 

1 (1) in paragraph (2), by adding ‘‘or’’ at the 

2 end; 

3 (2) by striking paragraph (3); and 

4 (3) by redesignating paragraph (4) as para5 graph (3). 

6 (b) SPECIAL PAY.—Section 7431(f) of title 38, 

7 United States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (1), by adding ‘‘or’’ at the 

9 end; 

10 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘; or’’ and in11 serting a period; and 

12 (3) by striking paragraph (3). 

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Barbara Lampley v. D’Nisha Sterling

Appellate case number: 01-22-00549-CV

Trial court case number: 18-DCV-248776

Trial court: 400th District Court of Fort Bend County

The clerk’s record was filed September 7, 2022. A reporter’s record was filed on 

September 16, 2022 from a hearing conducted on June 29, 2021. On October 7, 2022, 

appellant filed a motion to abate the appeal, contending that she requested reporter’s 

records from various hearings, but that transcripts from these hearings have not been made 

a part of the appellate record. Appellee did not respond to the motion. Accordingly, we 

issue the following order:

The judge of the 400th District Court is ordered to conduct a hearing at which the 

court reporters, Mindy Hall and Stephanie A. Webb, appellant’s counsel and appellee’s 

counsel shall participate (a) to determine whether the appellate record is complete, (b) to 

determine the reason for failure to file the reporter’s records, if any; (c) to establish a date 

certain when any additional reporter’s record will be filed, and (d) to make whatever 

additional findings and orders to ensure that the appellate record is timely filed. The trial 

court shall forward to this court a supplemental clerk’s record containing its relevant 

findings and orders. The hearing record and supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with 

the clerk of this court within 30 days of the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active 

docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the trial court’s 

findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will also consider an 

appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal on its own motion. If the court reporter files the 

record(s) prior to the date set for the hearing, the appeal will be reinstated and the trial court 

need not hold a hearing.

.

It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Sherry Radack_____

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___October 27, 2022___
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 OFFICERS CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302*
             Date: October 26, 2006By:
    
    /s/ Robert M. Shields, Jr.Name: Robert M. Shields, Jr.Title: Chief Executive Officer
 
 *
    
The introductory portion of paragraph 4 of the Section 302 certification that refers to the
certifying officers responsibility for establishing and maintaining internal control over
financial reporting for the company, as well as paragraph 4(b), have been omitted in accordance
with Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003) because the compliance period has been extended for small
business issuers until the first fiscal year ending on or after
April 15, 2005.
#### Otha Charles Hargrove, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority et al., Respondents.

[854 NYS2d 182]

The Supreme Court properly determined that the defendants satisfied their respective prima facie burdens on their separate motions for summary judgment by showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]).

In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The plaintiff relied on various unaffirmed and unsworn medical reports in opposing the defendants’ motions, all of which were without any probative value *(see Patterson v NY Alarm Response Corp.,*45 AD3d 656 [2007]; *Verette v Zia,*44 AD3d 747, 748 [2007]; *Nociforo v Penna,*42 AD3d 514, 515 [2007]; *see also Grasso v Angerami,*79 NY2d 813 [1991]; *Pagano v Kingsbury,*182 AD2d 268 [1992]). The affirmation of Dr. Arden Kaisman, one of the plaintiffs physicians, also was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact since Dr. Kaisman relied on an unsworn report of another physician in reaching his conclusions *(see Malave v Basikov,*45 AD3d 539, 540 [2007]; *Govori v Agate Corp.,*44 AD3d 821 [2007]; *Verette v Zia,*44 AD3d at 748; *Furrs v Griffith,*43 AD3d 389, 390 [2007]; *Friedman v U-Haul Truck Rental,*216 AD2d 266, 267 [1995]).

The plaintiffs magnetic resonance imaging reports merely showed that as of August 2004 the plaintiff had, among other *693things, a bulging disc at L5-S1. The mere existence of a herniated or bulging disc is not evidence of a serious injury in the absence of objective evidence of the extent of the alleged physical limitations resulting from the injury and its duration (see *Shvartsman v Vildman,*47 AD3d 700 [2008]; *Patterson v NY Alarm Response Corp.,*45 AD3d 656 [2007]; *Tobias v Chupenko,*41 AD3d 583, 584 [2007]; *Mejia v DeRose,*35 AD3d 407, 407-408 [2006]). Further, the plaintiffs self-serving affidavit was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact, as there was no objective medical evidence in support of it (see *Shvartsman v Vildman,*47 AD3d 700 [2008]; *Tobias v Chupenko,*41 AD3d at 584).

The plaintiffs remaining admissible medical submissions were insufficient to establish that he sustained a medically-determined injury of a nonpermanent nature which prevented him from performing his usual and customary activities for 90 of the 180 days following the subject accident *(see Roman v Fast Lane Car Serv., Inc.,*46 AD3d 535 [2007]; *Sainte-Aime v Ho,*274 AD2d 569, 570 [2000]). Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Covello, McCarthy and Chambers, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1660]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Biomedical Behavioral Interface.
    Date: February 5, 2009.
    Time: 2:30 p.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, 3AN12c, Bethesda, MD, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Meredith D. Temple-O'Connor, PhD, Scientific 
Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center 
Drive, Room 3AN12C, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-2772, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9febfaf2eff3faf0fcf2dff2fef6f3b1f1f6f7b1f8f0e9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0d4c5cdd0ccc5cfc3cde0cdc1c9cc8ecec9c88ec7cfd6">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 16, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-1660 Filed 1-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Grace 5, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Virginia K. Sourlis,
Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




Dated:  March
18, 2009





Grace
      5, Inc.By:
              /s/ VIRGINIA K. SOURLISVirginia
      K. SourlisPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)(Principal
      Financial Officer)
Exhibit 31.3
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 I, Jeffrey M. Rojek, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GLG Partners, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  November 9, 2009
    /s/ Jeffrey M. RojekJeffrey M. RojekChief Financial Officer