alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-1542

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Corey D. Williams, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: February 7, 2006

Filed: February 14, 2006

___________

Before ARNOLD, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Corey D. Williams appeals the sentence imposed upon his guilty plea to

possessing cocaine and to being a felon in possession of a firearm. For reversal

Mr. Williams argues that the district court1

 erroneously determined his base offense

level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(2) (felon in possession of firearm where prior

felonies include at least two convictions for either crime of violence or controlled

substance). In particular, Mr. Williams argues that stealing a motor vehicle, for which

he has a prior state felony conviction, is not a crime of violence. Setting aside the
-2-

issue whether Mr. Williams properly preserved his objection, we conclude his

argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent, see United States v. Barbour, 395 F.3d

826, 827-28 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 133 (2005); United States v. Sprouse,

394 F.3d 578, 580-81 (8th Cir. 2005); United States v. Sun Bear, 307 F.3d 747, 752-

53 (8th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 916 (2003), and we decline Mr. Williams’s

invitation to reconsider Sprouse and Sun Bear: only the court sitting en banc may do

so, see United States v. Wright, 22 F.3d 787, 788 (8th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, we

affirm. 

______________________________
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: GetLinks Inc. v. Kalibrr Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00 728

- CV

Trial court case number: 20 21

- 26067

Trial court: 80 th District Court of Harris County

On J uly 21 , 20 22 , appellant s , Angkor Capital Limited, GetLinks Inc.

, and Keenan Kwok,

filed a n unopposed motion asking this Court to abate the appeal, pending the outcome of the trial court’s July 20, 2022 dismissal order, dismissing the claims of appellee, Kalibrr Inc. W e deny the

motion to abate . Appellant s may seek extensions of time to file their brief. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 10.5(b).

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Sherry Radack

________  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___ August 4, 2022

____
Case 3:11-cv-01465-AET-DEA Document 25 Filed 04/24/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 256
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

Certain confidential portions of this Exhibit were omitted by means of blackout
of the text (the "Mark"). This Exhibit has been filed separately with the
Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission without the Mark pursuant to
the Company's Application for Order Granting Confidential Treatment pursuant to
Rule 406 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.


Innovative Drug Delivery Systems, Inc.
September 22, 2000

CONFIDENTiAL

Dr. Donald B. Morel Sr,, Division President
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
101 Gordon Drive
Lionville, PA 19341


Re: Letter Agreement


Dear Don:

This letter shall serve as our agreement that Section 4.1 of the License
Agreement between West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., its wholly owned
subsidiary West Pharmaceutical Services Drug Delivery & Clinical Research Centre
Ltd. and Innovative Drug Delivery Systems, Inc. is hereby amended in its
entirety to read as follows:

4.1 License Fees. IDDS shall pay to West the amount of $*** on or before
September 27, 2000.

If this is acceptable to you, kindly execute this Letter Agreement where
appropriate and return a copy to me at your earliest convenience.

Thank you.


                                    Sincerely,



                                    Mark C. Rogers, M.D.
                                    Chairman


WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES, INC.

By:  /s/ Donald E. Morel Jr.
   ----------------------------------------------
         Donald E. Morel Jr., Division President,
         Drug Delivery Systems


WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES DRUG DELIVERY &
CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTRE LTD.

By:  /s/ Donald E. Morel Jr., Chairman
   ----------------------------------------------
         Donald E. Morel Jr., Chairman

                       787 Seventh Avenue 48th Floor New York, NY 10019
                        Tel: 212-554-4351 Fax: 212-554-4490


*** Represents material which has been omitted pursuant to an Application for
    Order Granting Confidential Treatment and filed separately with the
    Commission.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MARK MILLS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee.

No. 4D2022

- 3159

[ April 4, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County; Steven J. Levin, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562019CF002164.

Olivia McBride Goodman, O’Brien Hatfield, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee , and Deborah Koenig,

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS

, G ERBER and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
|   |             |   |   |   | RIDGEWOOD ENERGY T FUND, LLC                    |
|--------|------------------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: | October 26, 2010 | By:    | /s/    |   | ROBERT E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |             |   | Name:  |   | Robert E. Swanson                                    |
|   |             |   | Title: |   | Chief Executive Officer                              |
|   |             |   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                        |
|   |             |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |             |   |   |   |                                                 |
| Dated: | October 26, 2010 | By:    | /s/    |   | KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |             |   | Name:  |   | Kathleen P. McSherry                                 |
|   |             |   | Title: |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |             |   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                        |
|   |             |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |             |   |   |   |                                                 |

----
EX-10.42



 EXHIBIT 10.42 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
 MOODY’S CORPORATION CAREER TRANSITION PLAN 

Section 2.2 of the Moody’s Corporation Career Transition Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new sentence to the end thereof,
effective as of the date this First Amendment is adopted: 
 If the Eligible Employee’s benefits hereunder are subject to Section 409A
of the Code, the Eligible Employee must return the executed Severance and Release Agreement no later than sixty (60) days following the date of the Eligible Termination and, if such 60-day period includes two calendar years, no benefits hereunder
subject to Section 409A of the Code shall be paid to the Eligible Employee until the second calendar year. 

  

			
	MOODY’S 2012 10-K
Exhibit 32.2





SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MedPro Safety Products, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marc T. Ray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:December 13, 2011By:/s/ Marc T. RayMarc T. RayChief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

PETER MANUEL CANDELARIA,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-20-00011-CR

Appeal from the

118th District Court 

of Howard County, Texas 

(TC#15,560) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no reversible 

error in the judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 23RD OF APRIL, 2021.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
NUVA-EX10.13-2012-10-K




Exhibit 10.13
Alex Lukianov
Chief Executive Officer




	
		
	Russell Powers
[ADDRESS]
	October 4, 2012




Dear Russell:


Congratulations on your promotion into the role of Executive Vice President, International. At NuVasive, promotions recognize your outstanding performance standards and your consistent efforts to perpetuate and grow our culture. In your capacity as EVP, International, you will report directly to me. I would like for you to begin work in this capacity with the Company on October 5, 2012.


Your new rate of compensation will be $325,000 annually ("Base Salary"), which will be reflected on your October 15th paycheck. You will receive 15,000 Restricted Stock Units (RSUs), representing shares of NuVasive stock, with the opportunity to earn an additional 5,000 RSUs in the event that all three international regions achieve quota for 2012. These RSUs will vest over four years in accordance with the Award Documents. You will be eligible for an annual bonus in the amount of up to 60% of your Base Salary. Eligibility for this bonus is tied to achievement of Individual Performance Measures, department goals and company performance.


A new role offers tremendous opportunities to learn, stretch and engage at an even deeper level. I trust that you will take advantage of these new opportunities. As Shareowners, our common goal is to advance NuVasive's Top 3 Priorities, while demonstrating Absolute Responsiveness® in all of our interactions and exhibiting the unique combination of cultural attributes that will soon propel NuVasive to be the No. 3 spine company in the world and the first $1B Start-Up! It is an exciting, rewarding journey; I look forward to continuing it with you. Keep up the great work and let's do all we can to achieve OUTSTANDING results for the remainder of 2012!
I wish you tremendous success in your new role!
Very Truly Yours,


/s/ Alexis V. Lukianov                            
Alexis V. Lukianov


Please sign below indicating your understanding and acceptance of this new role and return the fully executed letter to Craig Hunsaker, Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources. You should keep a copy of this letter for your records.


/s/ Russell Powers                            
Russell Powers
Case 3:11-cr-00161-JAP Document 67 Filed 11/30/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 527
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED 
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gordon Clayton, the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of Find The World Interactive, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: May 13, 2009



/s/ Gordon Clayton

--------------------------------

Name: Gordon Clayton

Title: Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and

Chief Accounting Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 7294

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JORGE SOSA, a/k/a Koki, a/k/a Loco , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. ( 3:15

- cr - 00121

- RJC

- DSC

- 29 ; 3:22

- cv 00559

- RJC )

Submitted : March 21, 2023 Decided: March 24, 2023

Before WYNN and RICHARD S ON , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Jorge Sosa , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7294 Doc: 6 Filed: 03/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CUR IAM: Jorge Sosa seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion as successive and unauthorized . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When , as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate bo th that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sosa has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ad equately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-7294 Doc: 6 Filed: 03/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
FILED 

JUN 0 3 2016 

gde.QA 

Pickering 

J. 

aitta 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

NAKIA WOODSON, D/B/A VIP BAIL No. 68990 

BONDS, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY 

INSURANCE COMPANY, A NEW 

JERSEY CORPORATION; AND 

ALLEGHENY CASUALTY COMPANY, 

A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, 

Respondents. 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order awarding 

attorney fees and costs. On May 3, 2016, this court entered an order 

granting appellant's untimely motion for an extension of time to file the 

opening brief and directed appellant to file the brief on or before May 18, 

2016. That order warned appellant that failure to comply could result in 

the imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of this appeal. To 

date, appellant has failed to file the opening brief or otherwise 

communicate with this court. Accordingly, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

, J. 

Hardesty 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 194Th )(tbeFir 
cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge 

Nakia Woodson 

Armstrong Teasdale, LLP/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

40) 1947A <Z44.4 

2 

Iffigr371 

'
1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No.2006-CR-3128B, styled State v. Jesse Mendez, in the 144th Judicial

District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl presiding.

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00380-CR

IN RE Jesse MENDEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 9, 2010

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On May 17, 2010, relator Jesse Mendez filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining

about the trial court’s failure to provide him a free copy of the record and statement of facts from his

underlying felony conviction so that he can prepare his post-conviction application for writ of habeas

corpus. In 2008, relator was convicted of robbery and was sentenced to 55 years’ confinement. On

December 30, 2009, this court affirmed the conviction. 

Only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over matters related to postconviction relief from an otherwise final felony conviction. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802

S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. 1991); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp.
04-10-00380-CR

-2-

2009); Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d

481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (holding that “Article 11.07 provides the exclusive means to

challenge a final felony conviction.”). Because the relief sought in relator’s petition relates to postconviction relief from an otherwise final felony conviction, we are without jurisdiction to consider

his petition for writ of mandamus. 

Accordingly, relator’s petition is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
UNITED STATES CO URT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. ALFREDO CABRERA-ZETINA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-6237 (D.C. No. 5:10-CR-00360-D-1) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TYMKOVICH , BALDOCK , and GORSUCH , Circuit Judges.
Alfredo Cabrera-Zetina pled guilty to one count of unlawful reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues on appeal that his above-guidelines sentence of 84-mont hs imprisonment is substantively unreasonable. 1 We have jurisdiction under 18 U. S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* After examining the briefs and appella te record, this pa nel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctr ines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cite d, however, for its persuasi ve value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 a nd 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
1 The guideline range was 33 to 41 months imprisonment. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### April 18, 2012
Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court- 2 - “[S]ubstantive reasonablenes s addresses whether the le ngth of the sentence is reasonable given all the circumstances of the case in light of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).” United States v. Huckins , 529 F.3d 1312, 1317 (10th Cir. 2008) (quotation omitted). “[W]e review the reasonablen ess of sentencing decisions, whether inside, just outside, or significantly outside th e Guidelines range, under a deferential abuse-of-dis cretion standard.” Id . (quotation and bracke ts omitted). “A district court abuses its di scretion when it renders a j udgment that is arbitrary, capricious, whimsical, or manifestly unreasonable.” Id . (quotation omitted). Mr. Cabrera-Zetina has been deported to Me xico five times. He has fourteen criminal convictions in th e United States, including a felony drug offense and two felony convictions for assault with a dangerous weapon. We have examined the record and considered the parties’ briefs. 2 The district court considered all of the re levant factors under § 3553(a) and more than adequately explained the reasons for imposing an above-guidelines sentence. Mr. Cabrera-Zetina’s arguments that the court somehow abused its discretion are without merit. We AFFIRM the district court’s sentence. Entered for the Court Bobby R. Baldock Circuit Judge

2 We have little doubt as to why Mr . Cabrera-Zetina did not request oral argument.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

______________________________ HAMID AL RAZAK, et al., : : Petitioners, : : v. : Civil Action No. 05-1601 (GK) : GEORGE W. BUSH, et al., : : Respondents. : ______________________________: ORDER A Status Conference was held in this case on January 13, 2009, which was open to the public. Upon consideration of the representations of the parties, and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED , that Petitioners will file a Notice with the Court if they wish to proceed with their petition for habeas corpus; and it is further ORDERED , that parties shall file a Joint Status Report on March 1, 2009 , describing how the case is proceeding.

/ s / January 14, 2009 Gladys Kessler United States District Judge Copies to: Attorneys of Record via ECF
Case 2:11-cr-00204-SDW Document 19 Filed 06/16/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 34
Case 2:11-cr-00204-SDW Document 19 Filed 06/16/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 35