alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Baoshinn Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, I, Benny Kan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:  1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated:  August 12, 2010 BAOSHINN CORPORATION By: /s/ Benny Kan Benny Kan  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Baoshinn Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, I, Sean Webster, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:  1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated:  August 12, 2010 BAOSHINN CORPORATION By:  /s/ Sean Webster Sean Webster
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 24, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1963

Lower Tribunal No. F11-32111

________________

Craig Mosby,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marisa 

Tinkler Mendez, Judge.

Craig Mosby, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Brian H. Zack, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Case 2:11-cr-00199-SDW Document 6 Filed 04/04/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 28
Case 2:11-cr-00199-SDW Document 6 Filed 04/04/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 29
Case 2:11-cr-00199-SDW Document 6 Filed 04/04/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 30
Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 92 Filed 10/30/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 3543
Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 92 Filed 10/30/13 Page 2 of 6 PageID: 3544
Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 92 Filed 10/30/13 Page 3 of 6 PageID: 3545
Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 92 Filed 10/30/13 Page 4 of 6 PageID: 3546
Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 92 Filed 10/30/13 Page 5 of 6 PageID: 3547
Case 1:11-cv-02658-JBS-KMW Document 92 Filed 10/30/13 Page 6 of 6 PageID: 3548
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Monarch Financial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ William F. Rountree, Jr.                        
|William F. Rountree, Jr.,                           
|President & Chief Executive Officer                 
|                                                    
|/s/ Brad E. Schwartz.                               
|Brad E. Schwartz                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                    
|Date: November 14, 2008                             



33
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

KOLE AKINOLA,

 Defendants.

Criminal Action No.: 11-310 (JLL)

ORDER

LINARES, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Kole Akinola’s omnibus motion, two 

motions to suppress, and motion for bail. For the reasons placed on the record on November 17, 

2011,

IT IS on this 28th day of November, 2011

ORDERED that the Defendant is granted two weeks from the date of entry of this Order 

to submit a brief in support of his second motion to suppress; and it is further

ORDERED that the government is granted ten (10) days from the submission date of the 

Defendant’s brief to submit an opposition to Defendant’s second motion to suppress; and it is 

further

ORDERED that this Court will hold an evidentiary hearing on Defendant’s first and 

second motions to suppress on Friday, January 20, 2012 at 10:30 a.m.; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant’s request for a list of the names of all Government 

informants is denied as moot as the Government has indicated that none exist; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant’s request for Brady and Giglio materials is denied as moot as 

the Government has represented that such material has already been produced. However, the 

Government is reminded of their continuing obligation to turn over these materials as they arise; 

and it is further 

ORDERED that the Government shall provide transcripts of the Grand Jury testimony of 

any witnesses that the Government intends to call at the suppression hearing; and it is further

Case 2:11-cr-00310-JLL Document 35 Filed 11/28/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 210
ORDERED that Defendant’s request pertaining to the Government’s 404(b) evidence is 

granted and the Government is to provide notice to Defendant at least ten (10) days before trial; 

and it is further

ORDERED that the Government shall comply with this Court’s standing order to turn 

over any Jencks material in a timely manner that does not cause delays to trial; and it is further

ORDERED that the Court reserves judgment on Defendant’s Motion for a Bill of 

Particulars; and it is further 

ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Bail is denied. 

SO ORDERED. 

/s/ Jose L. Linares 

JOSE L. LINARES

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:11-cr-00310-JLL Document 35 Filed 11/28/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 211
EXHIBIT 23


<PAGE>
                                                              Andersen
                                                              Luboshitz Kasierer


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements on Form
S-8, Registration Nos. 333-45422,  333-53814, 333-55130, 333-66250 and 333-82488
of our report  dated  January 30,  2002,  relating to the  consolidated  balance
sheets of RADVISION Ltd. and its  subsidiaries  as of December 31, 2000 and 2001
and the related consolidated statements of operations,  changes in shareholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the three years ended December 31, 2001, which
report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2001 of RADVISION Ltd.

                                            /s/Luboshitz Kasierer
                                            Luboshitz Kasierer
                                            Arthur Andersen


Tel Aviv, Israel
March 18, 2002
907 A.2d 1009

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT J. JONES, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

September 8, 2006.

ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted on the issue of defendant’s sentence, and the matter is summarily remanded to the trial court for resentencing in light of the Court’s decision in *State v. Pierce,*188 *N.J.*155, 902 A.2d 1195 (2006).
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the yearly report of China Pharma  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company") on 10-KSB/A for the period ended  December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Xinhua
Wu,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec.1350  as adopted  pursuant  section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to China  Pharma  Holdings,  Inc.  and will be retained by China
Pharma Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


                                                    Date: March 11, 2009


                                                    By:  /s/ Xinhua Wu
                                                         -------------
                                                         Xinhua Wu
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1196 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 86
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1196

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1715 Linnerud Drive in Sun Prairie, Wisconsin, as the ``Fire Captain 
                   Cory Barr Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 11, 2019

  Ms. Baldwin (for herself and Mr. Johnson) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

                              May 15, 2019

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1715 Linnerud Drive in Sun Prairie, Wisconsin, as the ``Fire Captain 
                   Cory Barr Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIRE CAPTAIN CORY BARR POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1715 Linnerud Drive in Sun Prairie, Wisconsin, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Fire Captain Cory Barr Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Fire 
Captain Cory Barr Post Office Building''.
                                                        Calendar No. 86

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1196

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1715 Linnerud Drive in Sun Prairie, Wisconsin, as the ``Fire Captain 
                   Cory Barr Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 15, 2019

                       Reported without amendment
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Principal  Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned  hereby  certifies  that, to his knowledge,  (i) the Form 10-KSB
filed by Weststar  Financial  Services  Corporation  (the "Issuer") for the year
ended December 31, 2004,  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  and (ii) the  information
contained  in  that  report  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for
the periods presented therein.

                                         Weststar Financial Services Corporation


Date: February 15, 2005                  By: /s/ Randall C. Hall
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Randall C. Hall
                                             Executive Vice President &
                                             Chief Financial and Principal
                                             Accounting Officer


                                       53
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

JOSEPH BONNER, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

PHILIP BRUNO, JR., et al.,

 Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-2320 (MLC)

 O P I N I O N

PLAINTIFFS’ COUNSEL advised the Court that the defendant Diane 

Tozzolo filed a bankruptcy petition on March 28, 2013 (“Bankruptcy 

Petition”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District 

of Maryland (“Maryland Bankruptcy Court”). (See dkt. entry no. 25, 

7-1-13 Letter from Pls.’ Counsel to Court at 1.) The Court has 

independently confirmed that the Bankruptcy Petition was filed by 

Diane Tozzolo Funkhouser, f/k/a Diane Marie Tozzolo. See Voluntary 

Pet. at 1, In re Funkhouser, No. 13-15465 (Bankr. D. Md. Mar. 28, 

2013), ECF No. 1. 

THE FILING of the Bankruptcy Petition triggered an automatic 

stay of this action insofar as claims are raised against Tozzolo. 

See 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1); Maritime Elec. Co., Inc. v. United 

Jersey Bank, 959 F.2d 1194, 1203-05 (3d Cir. 1991). The Court will 

thus stay and administratively terminate the action insofar as it 

has been brought against Tozzolo. Cf. Arpaio v. Dupre, No. 12-
2

3619, 2013 WL 2150869, at *3 (3d Cir. May 20, 2013) (resolving 

appeal, but limiting review of district court’s order to impact 

upon defendant who had not filed for bankruptcy relief).

THE COURT will also stay and administratively terminate the 

action insofar as claims are raised against the defendant Philip 

Bruno, Jr. Such action is taken pursuant to the Court’s inherent 

power to control the docket, to serve the interest of judicial 

efficiency. See Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936); 

Rolo v. Gen. Dev. Corp., 949 F.2d 695, 702 (3d Cir. 1991) 

(recognizing district court’s “inherent power to control its 

docket”).

ADMINISTRATIVE TERMINATION of the action is not the equivalent 

of a dismissal with prejudice. See, e.g., Delgrosso v. Sprang & 

Co., 903 F.2d 234, 236 (3d Cir. 1990) (noting that administrative 

termination, unlike a final order and judgment, “permits 

reinstatement and contemplates the possibility of future 

proceedings” and “does not purport to end litigation on the 

merits”). The administrative termination of this action does not 

affect the plaintiffs’ ability to move before the Maryland 

Bankruptcy Court for relief from the automatic stay. See Maritime 

Elec. Co., 959 F.2d at 1204 (“Only the bankruptcy court with 

jurisdiction over a debtor’s case has the authority to grant relief 

from the stay of judicial proceedings against the debtor.”) 
3

Similarly, it does not affect the plaintiffs’ ability to move to 

reopen the action when justice so requires, pursuant to Local Civil 

Rule 7.1.

THE COURT, for good cause appearing, will issue a separate 

Order.

 s/ Mary L. Cooper 

MARY L. COOPER

United States District Judge

Dated: July 11, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

Kenwood v. Home Depot Civ.

Order of Dismissal

Civil 10 - 6356 (SRC)

It having been reported to the Court that the above-captioned action has been

settled, and that the request for an order of dismissal is not based on a desire to adjourn or

delay the proceedings herein;

IT IS on this , 2012

12th DAY OF MARCH

ORDERED THAT:

(1) This action is hereby DISMISSED without cost and without prejudice to the

right, upon motion and good cause shown, within 60 days, to reopen this action if the settlement

is not consummated; and

(2) If any party shall move to set aside this Order of Dismissal as provided in the

first paragraph or pursuant to the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), in deciding such motion the

Court retains jurisdiction of the matter to the extent necessary to enforce the terms and conditions

of any settlement entered into between the parties.

S/Stanley R. Chesler,USDJ

Case 2:10-cv-06356-SRC -MAS Document 43 Filed 03/12/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 219
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5129

For the relief of Thomas W. Sikes and Wellington Trade, Inc., doing business 

as Containerhouse. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2004

Mr. NORWOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Thomas W. Sikes and Wellington Trade, 

Inc., doing business as Containerhouse.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury 

5 shall pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 

6 appropriated, $990,500, to the persons named in sub7 section (b) for damages sustained by such persons in con8 nection with a 1991 government contract for the purchase 

9 and delivery of certain ocean freight containers. 
2

•HR 5129 IH 

1 (b) PERSONS TO RECEIVE COMPENSATION.—The 

2 Secretary of the Treasury shall compensate the following 

3 persons under subsection (a): 

4 (1) Thomas W. Sikes of Cadwell, Georgia. 

5 (2) Wellington Trade Inc., of Cornelia, Georgia, 

6 doing business as Containerhouse. 

7 SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED 

8 STATES. 

9 Payment under section 1 shall constitute full settle10 ment of all legal and equitable claims by the persons 

11 named in section 1(b) against the United States for the 

12 damages described in section 1(a). 

13 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY AND AGENT FEES. 

14 Not more than 10 percent of the payment made 

15 under section 1 may be paid to or received by an agent 

16 or attorney as consideration for any service rendered in 

17 connection with this Act. Each violation of this section is 

18 punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350



(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the annual report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce A. Williamson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                                                          
|------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |    
|Date: March 5, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/    BRUCE A. WILLIAMSON                               
|                    |  |     |  | Bruce A. Williamson President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dynegy Holdings Inc. and will be retained by Dynegy Holdings Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### BALZAC BROS. & CO., Inc., v. COLOMBIAN S. S. CO., Inc. J. ARON & CO., Inc., v. SAME.

District Court, S. D. New York;

March 13, 1944.

Crawford & Sprague, of New York City (Stuart Sprague, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

*471Burlingham, Veeder, Clark & Hupper, of New York City, for defendant.

COXE, District Judge.

The plaintiffs in the above entitled actions move under Rule 34 of the Federal Rules, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for a discovery and inspection of certain designated books, records and documents.

The actions are for damages for alleged fraud. The plaintiffs are coffee importers and the defendant is a shipping concern. The complaints allege in substance that for a number of years the plaintiffs paid to the defendant the sum of $1.58, in addition to the regular freight charges, for each long ton of coffee shipped on defendant’s ships, upon the false representation that such payments were required by and had to be turned over to the Republic of Colombia. The defendant admits charging $1.58, but denies all the other material allegations of the complaint. It denies making the repersentations, denies that such representations were _false, and denies that the charges in question were not turned over to the Republic of Colombia. The last two denials are inconsistent with the first, but such pleading is allowed under Rule 8(e).

The issues raised by the pleadings are such that any books, records or documents in the defendant’s possession which would throw light on the $1.58 charge, the circumstances surrounding its imposition, and the understanding of the parties with reference thereto, might contain material evidence. Under Rule 34, if such records are not privileged, they may be inspected and copied. All the records, documents and books referred to in the moving papers, with the possible exception of part of items (e), (f) and (h), fall within that category, and as to them the motion is granted.

As to items (e) and (f), the plaintiffs may inspect only such minutes, reports and communications as relate to the $1.58 charge; and as to item (h), the plaintiffs may inspect original signed copies of the two documents referred to therein, but the other papers appear to be unnecessary and immaterial.

The records are voluminous and bulky, and for that reason the inspection should take place wherever they may be stored or filed away.
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 29 Filed 03/28/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 63
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 29 Filed 03/28/11 Page 2 of 8 PageID: 64
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 29 Filed 03/28/11 Page 3 of 8 PageID: 65
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 29 Filed 03/28/11 Page 4 of 8 PageID: 66
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 29 Filed 03/28/11 Page 5 of 8 PageID: 67
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 29 Filed 03/28/11 Page 6 of 8 PageID: 68
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 29 Filed 03/28/11 Page 7 of 8 PageID: 69
Case 3:11-cr-00176-JAP Document 29 Filed 03/28/11 Page 8 of 8 PageID: 70