alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Penn Virginia GP Holdings, L.P. (the
Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank A. Pici, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
PVG GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                                                         
|----------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 8, 2007 |  |  |  | 
|                  |  |  | 
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Frank A. Pici                                       
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Frank A. Pici Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit
to the Report. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:10-cv-03872-ES-JAD Document 57 Filed 10/24/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 494
Case 2:10-cv-03872-ES-JAD Document 57 Filed 10/24/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 495
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             127                     538
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     127                     538
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,350                   7,350
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        15,000                  15,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,223)                (21,812)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       127                     538
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      411                     642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    411                     642
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (411)                   (642)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with the Annual Report of 2000 New Commerce, Inc..,  a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year  ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  (the "Report"), I, Troy Nikolai, President of the Company, certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section  1350), that to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of  the Company.

/s/ Troy Nikolai  Troy Nikolai  President
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Jon Suk, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Coastal Media
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of May, 2007.


/s/ Jon Suk
---------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cedric Ramsey, Appellant.

[855 NYS2d 162]

The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw his plea on this ground prior to sentencing *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v*Rusielewicz, 45 AD3d 704 [2007]; *People v Scott,*39 AD3d 570, 571 [2007]; *People v Nicholas,*8 AD3d 300 [2004]). In any event, to the extent that the contention can be reviewed on the record, we find that the defendant’s plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered *(see People v Fiumefreddo,*82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; *People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662 [1988]; *People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9, 17 [1983]).

The defendant’s further contention that he was denied his right to the effective assistance of counsel under the Federal and State Constitutions rests on matter partially dehors the record, which cannot be reviewed on direct appeal *(see People v Rusielewicz,*45 AD3d 704 [2007]; *People v Gonzalez,*44 AD3d 871 [2007], *lv denied*9 NY3d 1006 [2007]; *People v Bolden,*44 AD3d 784 [2007]). To the extent that the claim can be reviewed, the record does not support the defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel under either the Federal or the State Constitution *(see Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]; *People v McDonald,*1 NY3d 109 [2003]; *People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713 [1998]; *People v Ford,*86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]).

Moreover, since the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence that was thereafter imposed, he has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive *(see People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816 [1984]). Prudenti, P.J., Skelos, Miller, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 130 (Thursday, July 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16297]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Enhanced-Use Lease of VA Property for the Development and 
Operation of Parking and Commercial Facilities at the Department of 
Veterans Affairs Samuel S. Stratton VA Medical Center in Albany, NY

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

ACTION: Notice of intent to enter into an enhanced-use lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs intends to enter into an 
enhanced-use lease of approximately 2.4 acres of underutilized land at 
the Samuel S. Stratton VA Medical Center in Albany, New York. The 
selected lessee will finance, design, develop, construct, operate, 
manage and maintain a parking facility, and potentially a commercial 
facility. As consideration for the lease, the lessee will be required 
to provide VA with a new office building, at no cost to VA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward Bradley, Office of Asset 
Enterprise Management (044C), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-7778 (this is not 
a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title 38 U.S.C. 8161, et seq. states that 
the Secretary may enter into an enhanced-use lease if he determines 
that implementation of a business plan proposed by the Under Secretary 
for Health for applying the consideration under such a lease for the 
provision of medical care and services would result in a demonstrable 
improvement of services to eligible Veterans in the geographic service-
delivery area within which the property is located. This project meets 
this requirement.

    Approved: May 26, 2009.
John R. Gingrich,
Chief, of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. E9-16297 Filed 7-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
```
a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed
under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: May 16, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Edward J. GildeaEdward J. GildeaCEO, President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Lexent Inc. (the "Company") Annual Report on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin O'Kane, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: March 27, 2003           By:  /s/ Kevin O'Kane
      ----------------------        ----------------------
                                    Kevin O'Kane
                                    Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Lexent Inc. and will be retained by Lexent Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Hinson *v.*Guckenheimer.

T5leckley, C. J. — Though it be in the power of the trial judge, in the exercise of his discretion, to approve a brief of evidence after the term and after the time fixed by order for filing it has expired, yet he will not be reversed for refusing to approve it where the brief has not been presented to him for approval until after the expiration of such time and more than twelve months in addition.

October 22, 1894.

Motion for new trial. Before Judge Sweat. Appling superior court. March term, 1894.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*568There was a verdict at the March term, 1893. During the term Hinson moved for a new trial, and a rule *nisi*was issued, returnable the second Monday in June, 1893. The judge also passed an order allowing movant until said date to make out and tile a brief of the testimony, without prej udice. The motion was continued from time to time until the March term, 1894, when a consent order was granted, providing that the motion be heard in vacation at such time and place as might be fixed by the court upon notice to the parties or their counsel. "Under this order, on July 2,1894, the motion coming on to be heard, a motion to dismiss it was made, upon the ground that the brief of evidence filed by movant had not been approved by the court within the time prescribed by the order allowing movant time to make out and file a brief of evidence. Movant tendered to the judge for approval a brief of the evidence, upon which appeared an agreement signed by plaintiff’s attorney, dated May 19, 1893, that it be filed subject to the approval of the court; and an entry of filing in office the same date. It further appeared, that movant’s counsel had prepared the brief of evidence and delivered it, during the time' specified in the order, to plaintiff’s counsel, who had made certain corrections and interlineations in the brief, and signed the agreement indorsed thereon; and that movant’s counsel had filed the brief in the clerk’s office on the day stated in the entry. The judge refused tO' approve the brief, because it was not presented to him for approval within the time specified.in the order; and dismissed the motion.

E. P. Padgett, for plaintiff in error.

G. J. Holton & Son, *contra.*
#### HUFFMAN v. THE STATE.

Bleckley, C. J. — 1.An indictment under the code, 24577(a), for interrupting or disturbing a school, describes sufficiently the mode of interruption or disturbance, which charges that the offense was committed *“*by cursing and quarreling and fighting and discharging a loaded pistol, and by boisterous conduct and by otherwise indecently acting ”; and under such indictment, evidence is admissible which tends to establish the charge.

2. It is not cause for reversing the denial of a continuance that the movant made a legal showing as to the absence of one witness, it appearing bythe same showing, on cross-examination, that another witness was present by whom he could prove the facts to which the absent witness was expected to testify, and it not appearing that the discretion of the court was abused.

*4703. Although putting one out of a house in which the exercises of a school are being conducted, for misbehavior, is not an arrest, yet where the misbehavior amounted to a penal offense, it was a verbal inaccuracy rather than a substantial error for the court to denominate the expulsion as an arrest and instruct the jury that a private person is legally empowered to arrest any one committing an offense in his presence.

October 8,1894,

Indictment for misdemeanor. Before Judge Brown. City court of Carroll county. August 10, 1894.

Adamson & Jackson, for plaintiff in error.

T. A. Atkinson, solicitor-general, and *W.*D. Hamrick, by H. M. Reid, *contra.*

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jean Marc Desmarat, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 799]

*663The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see *Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Mastro, J.P., Florio, Garni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

______________

No. 12-4257

______________

SHAH RAHMAN,

Individually and On Behalf

of All Others Similarly Situated,

 Appellant

v.

KID BRANDS, INC.; BRUCE G. CRAIN;

GUY A. PAGLINCO; RAPHAEL BENAROYA

______________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(D.C. Civ. No. 2-11-cv-01624)

Honorable Jose L. Linares, District Judge

______________

Submitted under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

October 8, 2013

BEFORE: FUENTES, GREENBERG, and BARRY, Circuit Judges

______________

JUDGMENT

______________

This cause came on to be considered on the record on appeal from the United 

States District Court for the District of New Jersey and was submitted under Third Circuit 

LAR 34.1(a) on October 8, 2013. On consideration whereof, it is hereby

ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this Court that the District Court’s order of 

October 17, 2012, dismissing Rahman’s second amended complaint with prejudice is 

affirmed.

Costs taxed against appellant.

ATTEST:

Case 2:11-cv-01624-JLL-MAH Document 71 Filed 11/15/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1591
2

/s/Marcia M. Waldron 

 Clerk

DATED: November 15, 2013

Case 2:11-cv-01624-JLL-MAH Document 71 Filed 11/15/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1592
EXHIBIT 32.2



STRATEX NETWORKS, INC.



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the periodic report of Stratex Networks, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Carl A. Thomsen, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification has not been, and
shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                       
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 14, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Carl A. Thomsen                                   
|                    |  |  |  | Carl A. Thomsen Chief Financial and Accounting Officer