alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31

       Statement Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
         By Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
       Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings


I, Steven N. Bronson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
September 30, 2004;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

        a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
        material information relating to the registrant is made known to me by
        others, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
        being prepared;

        b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
        and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
        this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

        c) presented in this annual report my conclusions about the
        effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my
        evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the registrant's board of directors:

        a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
        controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified
        for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal
        controls; and

        b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
        controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date:  December 29, 2004.

                                            /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Steven N. Bronson, President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

GREYSTONE BANK, a North Carolina Bank,

Plaintiff, : Case No. 2:1 1-cv-O1 162 (WHW)

V.

OPINION AND

MOHAMED SAMSUDEEN : ORDER CONFIRMING SALE AND

NOORUL SAMSUDEEN, : AMENDING FINAL JUDGMENT

Defendants.

Walls, Senior District Judge

On August 1, 2012, this Court granted summary judgment in favor ofthe Plaintiff, Greystone

Bank (“Plaintiff’) and ordered Defendants to pay a final judgment in the amount of $596,027.73. ECF

Nos. 19-20. On September 5, 2013, Plaintiffmoved for an order confirming the foreclosure sale ofthe

property located at 94 Main Street, Woodbridge, New Jersey (Block 544, Lot 94 on the Tax Map of the

Township ofWoodbridge) to satisfy the judgment. ECF No. 26, Plaintiff attached to its motion an

appraisal report which, as the result of a thorough and persuasive analysis, assessed the subject

property’s fair market value at $350,000. ECF Nos. 26-2—26-5.

IT IS on this 26th day of September, 2013 hereby:

ORDERED that the U.S. Marshal’s report ofsale is approved and the sale is confirmed; and it

is further

ORDERED that final judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff GREYSTONE BANK in August

2012 be amended to reflect the fair market value ofthe property, leaving a balance which Defendants

MOHAMED SAMSUDEEN and NOORUL SAMSUDEEN owe to Plaintiffin the amount of

$246,027.73, plus post judgment interest thereon, and that execution may issue in accordance with the

law; and it is further

ORDERED that the U.S. Marshal is directed to issue a deed sufficient to convey title to the

purchaser, and it is further

1

Case 2:11-cv-01162-WHW-MCA Document 27 Filed 09/26/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 666
ORDERED that there is no just reason to delay enforcement of or appeal from this final order.

William H. Walls

United States Senior District Judge

Case 2:11-cv-01162-WHW-MCA Document 27 Filed 09/26/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 667
Case 1:10-cv-03293-JHR-AMD Document 1 Filed 06/29/10 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 1
Case 1:10-cv-03293-JHR-AMD Document 1 Filed 06/29/10 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 2
Case 1:10-cv-03293-JHR-AMD Document 1 Filed 06/29/10 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 3
Case 1:10-cv-03293-JHR-AMD Document 1 Filed 06/29/10 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 4
Exhibit 32.2  Certification  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:  (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;  (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  By:Inland Real Estate Investment CorporationGeneral PartnerBy:/s/ Donna UrbainName:Donna UrbainTitle:Principal Financial Officer with respect to Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.Date:May 7, 2009
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Coronado Corp. (the "Company") onForm 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Alejandro Quesada, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Sect. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sect. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the29 day of November, 2006.

/s/ Alejandro Quesada

_______ 

Chief Executive Officer

 

----

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Coronado Corp. (the "Company") onForm 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, ShawnPhillips, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Sect. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sect. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the29 day of November, 2006.

/s/ Shawn Phillips

_______ 

Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

_________________________________

NEW COMMUNITY CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER RISK

MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., AON

RISK SERVICES NORTHEAST, INC.,

AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE

C O M P A N Y a n d A M E R IC A N

ASSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendants.

_________________________________

AON RISK SERVICES, NORTHEAST,

INC.

Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

OLYMPIC AGENCY, INC.

Third-Party Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Hon. Dennis M. Cavanaugh

ORDER

Civil Action No. 10-3208 (DMC)(JAD)

DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH, U.S. District Judge

 This matter comes before the Court on a Report and Recommendation filed by

Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Dickson on September 9, 2011 (ECF No. 82), recommending that

this Court grant Third-Party Defendant Olympic Agency, Inc.’s (“Olympic”) Motion for

Summary Judgment (ECF No. 51). The parties were given notice that pursuant to Local Civil

Rule 72.1, they had fourteen days from receipt of the Report and Recommendation to file and

serve any objections. Third-Party Plaintiff AON Risk Services, Northeast, Inc. (“AON”) filed a

Case 2:10-cv-03208-SRC-CLW Document 88 Filed 09/30/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1049
letter on September 23, 2011 objecting to Judge Dickson’s Report and Recommendation (ECF

No. 85). Olympic filed a letter in response on September 27, 2011 (ECF No. 86). 

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo and concurs in Judge

Dickson’s opinion. AON’s objection improperly attempts to assert new arguments not previously

raised before Judge Dickson. These arguments are waived. AON’s other objections are ineffective

and wholly unsupported by the record. Therefore, this Court will adopt the Report and

Recommendation as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS on this 30th day of September 2011, 

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Dickson

(ECF No. 82) is hereby adopted as the Opinion of the Court; 

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Third-Party Defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment (ECF No. 51) is granted.

 S/ Dennis M. Cavanaugh 

 Dennis M. Cavanaugh, U.S.D.J.

Original: Clerk

cc: All Counsel of Record

Hon. J. A. Dickson, U.S.M.J.

File

Case 2:10-cv-03208-SRC-CLW Document 88 Filed 09/30/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1050
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection
with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Velocity Asset Management,
Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2007, I, James J. Mastriani, Chief
Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. Such Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

2. The
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Velocity Asset Management, Inc.

Dated: March
17, 2008

| |                                                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ James J.
  Mastriani                                        
| |                                                                 
| | James J.
  Mastriani                                            
| | Chief
  Financial Officer, Chief Legal                          
| | Officer,
  Secretary, Treasurer (Principal
  Accounting Officer)

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4970 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4970

To amend title 49, United States Code, to repeal the security screening 
                 opt-out program for airport operators.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2004

  Mrs. Maloney (for herself, Mr. Holt, Mr. McDermott, and Mr. Owens) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 49, United States Code, to repeal the security screening 
                 opt-out program for airport operators.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Passenger Security Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. SECURITY SCREENING OPT-OUT PROGRAM.

    Section 44920 of title 49, United States Code, and the item 
relating to such section in the analysis for chapter 449 of such title, 
are repealed.
                                 <all>
```
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| February      5, 2010 | By:    | /s/      Wu, Man-Shing                                       |   |
|-----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | Wu,      Man-Shing                                           |   |
|                  |   | Chief      Executive OfficerPrincipal      Executive Officer |   |

----
ITRI EX-10.6 12.31.12






Exhibit 10.6
      
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS    
      
MariLyn R. Blair    
Robert M. Burks, Jr.    
Barbara J. Doyle
Deloris R. Duquette    
Kirby A. Dyess      
Jon E. Eliassen    
Charles H. Gaylord    
Thomas S. Glanville    
Steven M. Helmbrecht    
John W. Holleran    
Phillip Le Bris    
Chuck McAtee    
Philip C. Mezey    
Sharelynn F. Moore
Sharon L. Nelson    
Simon Pontin
Carl W. Porter    
Gary E. Pruitt    
Marcel Regnier    
Jared P. Serff    
Russell E. Vanos    
Shannon M. Votava
Robert W. Whitney    
Graham M. Wilson
#### SEARS ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SHREVEPORT, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-30205.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 6, 2012.

James M. Garner, Esq., John Thomas Balhoff, II, Esq., Melissa M. Rome, Esq., Sher, Garner, Cahill, Richter, Klein *&*Hilbert, L.L.C., New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Julie Mobley Lafargue, Abrams & La-fargue, Shreveport, LA, for Defendant Appellee.

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and GARZA and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

*393PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff, Sears Roebuck & Company (“Sears”), incurred significant damages as a result of flooding from severe storms and rainfall which took place in Shreveport, Louisiana, in 2008 and 2009. Sears filed suit against Defendant, the City of Shreveport (the “City”), alleging various claims of negligence and liability related to the construction of a project in the City involving the Ockley Ditch, which was intended to minimize and alleviate flood-related problems in the affected area.

The City moved for summary judgment against Sears asserting various defenses under the Louisiana Revised Statutes and the Louisiana Civil Code, including prescription, discretionary immunity, and that the storms qualified as an “Act of God.” The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the City and Sears appealed.

After reviewing the record, the applicable statutory and case law, and the district court’s summary judgment and reasoning, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment and adopt its analysis in full.1

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under . the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

1

. On appeal, Sears raises for the first time an inverse condemnation argument. We conclude this argument is waived. *See Celanese Corp. v. Martin K. Eby Const. Co., Inc., 620*F.3d 529, 531 (5th Cir.2010) ("The general rule of this court is that arguments not raised before the district court are waived and will not be considered on appeal.”).
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

As independent registered public accountants, we herebyconsent to the incorporation of our report dated December 23, 2005 (except for the 19th and 20th paragraphs of Note 8 as to which the date is November 4, 2006 and the 2nd paragraph of Note 9 as to which the date is January 17,2007), relating to the financial statements and schedule of Salary.com, Inc. for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, included in this Form 10-K into the Company’s previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 FileNo. 333-141204. 

/s/ VITALE, CATURANO & COMPANY, LTD. 

Boston, Massachusetts 

June 22, 2007
Exhibit 10.43


           THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN
          NATIONAL MEDICAL HEALTH CARD SYSTEMS, INC. AND JAMES BIGL


     This Third  Amendment dated October 14, 2002  ("Effective  Date") is by and
among National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc., (the "Company") and James Bigl
("Employee").  All defined terms used, but not otherwise  defined herein,  shall
have their meanings set forth in the Employment Agreement,  as amended,  between
Company and Employee  dated May 3, 2000 and amended July 18, 2001 and as further
amended on April 15, 2002 (the "Amended Employment Agreement").

                                   WITNESSETH:

     WHEREAS,  the Company and Employee have entered into the Amended Employment
Agreement; and

     WHEREAS,  both the Company and the Employee  are desirous to amend  certain
provisions of the Amended Employment Agreement.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of the mutual  covenants  and promises
contained herein, the parties agree as follows:


     1. Paragraph 4 shall be amended to add as a second paragraph the following:

               "The  Company  shall  hold  Employee  harmless  from  any  golden
          parachute tax imposed by any federal,  state or local taxing authority
          as a result of any of the payments  made  pursuant to this  Agreement,
          including  any Stock  Options  granted  to  Employee  by the  Company.
          Payment of such golden parachute tax plus any additional taxes imposed
          as a result of the  payment by the  Company of such  golden  parachute
          tax, shall be made at the time Employee is required to pay such golden
          parachute tax.  Employee agrees to cooperate fully with the Company in
          any protest or appeal by the Company in the event of the imposition of
          such golden parachute tax."

     2. Except as expressly  provided  herein,  all terms and  conditions of the
Amended Agreement shall be unmodified and in full force and effect.

     3.  From and  after the  execution  and  delivery  of this  Amendment,  all
references  to  the  Amended   Agreement   contained  in  other  agreements  and
instruments  executed  and  delivered  pursuant  to or in  connection  with  the
Agreement shall  hereinafter  mean and refer to the Ameded  Agreement as amended
hereby.

     4. This Amendment may be executed in  counterparts  by the parties  hereto,
all of  which  shall  constitute  one  and  the  same  instrument.  A  facsimile
transmission of this signed  amendment  bearing a signature on behalf of a party
hereto shall be binding on such party.


<PAGE>


     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Company and Employee  have  executed  this Second
Amendment the day and year first above written.

                          NATIONAL MEDICAL HEALTH CARD
                          SYSTEMS, INC.
                          By:

                          ___________________________________
                          Bert E. Brodsky, Chairman of the Board


                          ___________________________________
                          James Bigl
GTE - 2012.12.31 - EX 10.74





Exhibit 10.74


Date:       February 15, 2013


To:           Solana Resources Ltd


From:     Wells Fargo Bank NA


Subject:  February 2013 Interim Borrowing Base Redetermination – Effectiveness Memo




Pursuant to Section 2.07 of the Credit Agreement dated July 30, 2010 for Solana Resources Ltd (“Solana”), the  Administrative Agent  hereby provides notice that  the  Borrowing Base amount for Solana has been increased to $100,000,000 and is now effective (as of February 15, 2013) until the next scheduled borrowing base redetermination.


Final allocations are as follows:


Gran Tierra Energy  Lender Allocations










Total Allocation


	
					
	Lender
	 
	$
	 
	%

	

Wells Fargo Bank
	 
	$100,000,000.00
	 
	

100.00%

	

Total
	 
	

$100,000,000.00
	 
	

100.00%
# table141_q15.2_size