Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 127 / Monday, July 6, 2009 / Notices 31975 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

public hearings that were addressed for 

inclusion in the PR/FEIS. Where 

appropriate, revisions were made in 

response to specific comments. 

No decision will be made on the 

proposed Federal action until at least 30 

days after release of the PR/FEIS. After 

the 30-day waiting period, Reclamation 

will complete a Record of Decision. The 

Record of Decision will state which 

alternative analyzed in the PR/FEIS will 

be implemented and discuss all factors 

leading to that decision. 

Dated: June 5, 2009. 

Larry Walkoviak, 

Regional Director—UC Region. 

[FR Doc. E9–15650 Filed 7–2–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1012 (Review)] 

Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From 

Vietnam; Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year review, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (Commission) determines, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order on certain frozen fish fillets from 

Vietnam would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted this 

review on July 1, 2008 (73 FR 37487) 

and determined on October 6, 2008 that 

it would conduct a full review (73 FR 

62318, October 20, 2008). Notice of the 

scheduling of the Commission’s review 

and of a public hearing to be held in 

connection therewith was given by 

posting copies of the notice in the Office 

of the Secretary, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, Washington, DC, 

and by publishing the notice in the 

Federal Register on January 15, 2009 

(74 FR 2616). The hearing was held in 

Washington, DC, on May 6, 2009, and 

all persons who requested the 

opportunity were permitted to appear in 

person or by counsel. 

The Commission transmitted its 

determination in this review to the 

Secretary of Commerce on June 26, 

2009. The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 4083 

(June 2009), entitled Certain Frozen Fish 

Fillets from Vietnam: Investigation No. 

731–TA–1012 (Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: June 26, 2009. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–15797 Filed 7–2–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–543 (Remand Proceeding) 

(Enforcement Proceeding)] 

In the Matter of Certain Baseband 

Processor Chips and Chipsets, 

Transmitter and Receiver (Radio) 

Chips, Power Control Chips, and 

Products Containing Same, Including 

Cellular Telephone Handsets; Notice of 

Commission Determination Not To 

Review an Initial Determination 

Terminating the Investigation Based 

on a Settlement Agreement 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review the presiding administrative law 

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination 

(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 74) granting a joint 

motion to terminate the investigation 

based on a settlement agreement. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Daniel E. Valencia, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–1999. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 

21, 2005, the Commission instituted an 

investigation under section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based 

on a complaint filed by Broadcom 

Corporation (‘‘Broadcom’’) of Irvine, 

California, alleging a violation of section 

337 in the importation, sale for 

importation, and sale within the United 

States after importation of certain 

baseband processor chips and chipsets, 

transmitter and receiver (radio) chips, 

power control chips, and products 

containing same, including cellular 

telephone handsets by reason of 

infringement of five patents. 70 FR 

35707 (June 21, 2005). Broadcom named 

Qualcomm Incorporated (‘‘Qualcomm’’) 

of San Diego, California as the only 

respondent. On December 8, 2006, the 

Commission affirmed the ALJ’s final ID 

finding a violation due to infringement 

of U.S. Patent No. 6,714,983. On June 7, 

2007 the Commission issued a limited 

exclusion order and a cease and desist 

order to Qualcomm. Qualcomm 

appealed the Commission’s 

determination to the U.S. Court of 

Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

(‘‘Federal Circuit’’) on August 7, 2007, 

which appeal was consolidated under 

the lead case Kyocera Wireless Corp. v. 

International Trade Commission, Nos. 

2007–1492, et al. (‘‘Kyocera’’). 

On November 9, 2007, Broadcom filed 

an enforcement complaint pursuant to 

Commission Rule 210.75, alleging, inter 

alia, that Qualcomm has violated and 

continues to violate the Commission’s 

cease and desist order. Based on 

Broadcom’s complaint, the Commission 

instituted the enforcement proceeding 

on December 28, 2007. 72 FR 73879 

(Dec. 28, 2007). On October 14, 2008, 

the Federal Circuit issued an opinion in 

Kyocera, remanding the underlying 

investigation to the Commission. 

On May 6, 2009, Broadcom and 

Qualcomm jointly moved to terminate 

this investigation based upon a 

settlement agreement, pursuant to 

Commission rule 210.21 (19 CFR 

210.21). On May 15, 2009, the 

Commission investigative attorney filed 

a response in support of the joint 

motion to terminate the investigation. 

On June 11, 2009, the ALJ issued the 

subject ID granting the joint motion to 

terminate the investigation. No petitions 

for review of the ID were filed. The 

Commission has determined not to 

review the subject ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42). 

Dated: Issued: June 30, 2009. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES