alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Palace Entertainment Holdings, Inc.(the Company) , a Delaware corporation, for the period ended June 30, 2006 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), each of the undersigned, John A. Cora, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, and James A. Burk, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

1.                                       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof and for the periods presented in the Report.

The foregoingcertification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisionsof Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be usedor relied upon for any other purpose.

|        | **Signature** | ** **        | **Title** | ** ** | **Date**                 |
|--------|---------------|-------------------|-----------|------------|--------------------------|
|   | By:           | /s/ John A. Cora  |      |       | Chief Executive  Officer |   | August 16, 2006 |
|   |          | John A. Cora      |      |       |                     |   |
|   |          |              |      |       |                     |   |
|   | By:           | /s/ James A. Burk |      |       | Chief Financial  Officer |   | August 16, 2006 |
|   |          | James A. Burk     |      |       |                     |   |
|        |               |                   |           |            |                          |  |  |  |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toPalace Entertainment Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by PalaceEntertainment Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or staff upon request.

----
**EXHIBITNO. 99.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of NUI Corporation(the "company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, A.Mark Abramovic, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of thecompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)       thereport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2)       theinformation contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

/s/  A. Mark AbramovicA.Mark AbramovicChiefOperating Officer andChiefFinancial OfficerFebruary13 , 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4920 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4920

         To suspend temporarily the duty on amyl-anthraquinone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2004

  Mr. Baird introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on amyl-anthraquinone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMYL-ANTHRAQUINONE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.29.01      9, 10-              Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Anthracenedione                                                    31/2006
                         (CAS No. 113936-
                         21-5) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2914.69.90 in
                         pure form or
                         3824.90.28 in 50%
                         solution)........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:10-cv-06356-SRC -MAS Document 25 Filed 06/13/11 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 146
Case 2:10-cv-06356-SRC -MAS Document 25 Filed 06/13/11 Page 2 of 14 PageID: 147
Case 2:10-cv-06356-SRC -MAS Document 25 Filed 06/13/11 Page 3 of 14 PageID: 148
Case 2:10-cv-06356-SRC -MAS Document 25 Filed 06/13/11 Page 4 of 14 PageID: 149
Case 2:10-cv-06356-SRC -MAS Document 25 Filed 06/13/11 Page 5 of 14 PageID: 150
Case 2:10-cv-06356-SRC -MAS Document 25 Filed 06/13/11 Page 6 of 14 PageID: 151
Case 2:10-cv-06356-SRC -MAS Document 25 Filed 06/13/11 Page 7 of 14 PageID: 152
Case 2:10-cv-06356-SRC -MAS Document 25 Filed 06/13/11 Page 8 of 14 PageID: 153
Case 2:10-cv-06356-SRC -MAS Document 25 Filed 06/13/11 Page 9 of 14 PageID: 154
Case 2:10-cv-06356-SRC -MAS Document 25 Filed 06/13/11 Page 10 of 14 PageID: 155
Case 2:10-cv-06356-SRC -MAS Document 25 Filed 06/13/11 Page 11 of 14 PageID: 156
Case 2:10-cv-06356-SRC -MAS Document 25 Filed 06/13/11 Page 12 of 14 PageID: 157
Case 2:10-cv-06356-SRC -MAS Document 25 Filed 06/13/11 Page 13 of 14 PageID: 158
Case 2:10-cv-06356-SRC -MAS Document 25 Filed 06/13/11 Page 14 of 14 PageID: 159
#### Diane Mackie Cohen, Respondent, v Jordan Services, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[852 NYS2d 851]

*681The plaintiff failed to conclusively establish that the evidence was willfully destroyed or discarded in order to frustrate her interests. Accordingly, the extreme sanction of preclusion is not warranted *(see Vaughn v City of New York,*201 AD2d 556, 558 [1994]).

In view of our determination, we do not reach the parties’ remaining contentions. Skelos, J.P., Fisher, Covello and Eng, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Annual  Report of Par 3 Services,  Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Daniel L.  Hodges,
President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of GigaMedia Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Collin Hwang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2013



By:

/s/ Collin HwangCollin HwangChief Executive Officer




1
908 A.2d 180

#### IN THE MATTER OF HERBERT J. TAN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

October 18, 2006.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-021, concluding that HERBERT J. TAN of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1998, should be reprimanded for violating *RPC*8.1(a) (knowingly making a false statement of fact in connection with a bar admission application) and *RPC*8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that HERBERT J. TAN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
DIANE MARIE ACCIAVATTI, LLC

Attorney at Law

401 Hamburg Turnpike

Suite 302

Wayne, New Jersey 07470-2139

Phone: (973) 790-5008

Fax: (973) 790-0024

E Mail: Dmacciavatti@aol.com

March 26, 2012

Honorable Faith S. Hochberg, U.S.D.J.

United States District Court 

District of New Jersey

Frank R. Lautenberg United States Post Office & Courthouse

Room 369 

Newark, New Jersey 07101

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

 Re: Smith v. Lindemann et. al. 

 Civil Action No. 03319-10 (FSH\PS)

Dear Judge Hochberg:

I am writing with respect to Document Number 130 on the Docket

Report for the above matter, which is an Order Dismissing the Case

as settled. 

The Plaintiff has settled her claims against defendants

Lindemann, the Weinstein Snyder law firm, defendant Urbinato, the

Starr Gern law firm, and defendant DeMeo. The settling defendants

are also dismissing their third party claims against Lawrence

Smith, Esq. 

The Plaintiff has not settled the claims against defendants

Marc A. Calello, Esq. and Marc A. Calello, P.C. To my knowledge,

defendant Calello’s third party claims against Lawrence smith, Esq.

remain pending. 

I therefore respectfully request that the docket be corrected

to indicate that all of the defendants except Calello have settled

and that Stipulations of Dismissal will be filed with respect to

the settling defendants. 

Thank you for your consideration of this matter. 

 Respectfully submitted,

/s Diane Marie Acciavatti 

Diane Marie Acciavatti 

CC: All Counsel

By Electronic Filing)

Case 2:10-cv-03319-KM-MCA Document 131 Filed 03/26/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1261
#### MIKE’S TRAIN HOUSE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BROADWAY LIMITED IMPORTS, LLC and Robert Grubba, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 2012-1311.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 8, 2013.

*959Brian E. Ferguson, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

J. Wiley Horton, Pennington, Moore, Wilkinson, Bell & Dunbar, P.A., of Tallahassee, FL, argued for defendants-appel-lees. Of counsel was Adrienne C. Love.

DYK, MAYER, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
February 28, 2010 of Kayne Anderson Energy Development Company;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: April 9, 2010
    
    /s/ Kevin S. McCarthy

Kevin S. McCarthyChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
              SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DoMark International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R.
Thomas Kidd, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

                                           DoMark International, Inc.
                                                  Registrant

Date: October 15, 2008                     By: /s/ R. Thomas Kidd
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               R. Thomas Kidd
                                               Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                               (Principle Executive Officer,
                                               Principle Financial Officer)
#### Jackson, *ex dem.*Kip, *against*Corley.

ALBANY,

August, 1817.

A cause may be removed from a court of *common pleas*to this court by writ of a”s *¡o^ZZpoll]*'ejectment”3 and fendañtis notdiñ not filed ban, or endorsed, his appearance.

THIS was an action of ejectment, commenced in the court *°*Tr 7 of common pleas, or mayor’s court, of the city or *New-York)*17 *J 1*v in which common bail was filed, and issue joined; but before any trial or judgment in that court, a writ of *certiorari*was sued out of this court, directed to the court below, allowed, filed, and returned in due form.

The only question submitted to the court was, whether the action could be removed from the court of common pleas to this court by *certiorari.*

*Per Curiam.*

There can be no doubt that a writ of *certiorari*may issue, and perform the same office, in every case, as a writ of *habeas corpus.*The statute (1 *R. L.*140.,) puts them on the same footing, and considers them as equally efficacious in the removal of a cause from the courts of common pleas and mayor’s courts, into this court. Indeed, a *certiorari*is of more extensive use; for a *habeas corpus*lies only where the defendant has been arrested, and is in prison, or has been let to bail; or where he has been arrested on process, and endorsed his appearance on the writ, and where, as in the action of ejectment, common bail has been filed. In all these cases, the *certiorari*is equally applicable; and it is exclusively proper, when the defendant is not in custody, or has not filed common or special bail, or has not endorsed his appearance.

It is true, that in practice, the writ of *certiorari*has seldom been used. This, however, cannot take away the writ, or abridge its effect.

This cause is, therefore, well removed by the *certiorari*which has been issued.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 33-04295, No. 33-43898 and No. 333-11039) pertaining to the
Incentive Stock Option Plan of Westcorp, the Westcorp 1991 Incentive Stock
Option Plan and the Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership and Salary Savings Plan,
respectively, and in the related prospectus of our report dated January 28,
1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Westcorp included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.
 
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Los Angeles, California
March 12, 1997
 
                                      F-38
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Defentect Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge,
that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  December
      7, 2010
                      By:
                      /s/ John T. GrippoJohn
      T. Grippo, Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial
Officer)
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                            | Company      Name |                                                    |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                            |              |                                                    |   |
| Date:    November      19, 2008   | By:               | /s/ Yanhua Liu                                |   |
|                                                            |              | Yanhua Liu                                         |   |
|                                                            |              | Chief      Financial Officer                            |   |
|                                                            |              | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer)  |   |
Order entered March 19, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-14-00319-CV

IN RE J.C. RASOR, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 292nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F-9100094-TV



### ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD
JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8  Nos.333-06081,  33-62453,  33-80594,  33-53432,  33-45469,  33-41945,
33-25230,  33-19851 and 33-16625) pertaining to the Komag, Incorporated Restated
1987 Stock Option Plan, Komag Material Technology,  Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan,
the Komag,  Incorporated  Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Komag,  Incorporated
Restated 1987 Stock Option Plan, the Dastek  International Stock Option Plan and
the Dastek, Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan and in the Registration  Statement (Form
S-3 No. 33-61161) of Komag,  Incorporated  and in the related  Prospectus of our
report  dated  January 16,  1997,  with  respect to the  consolidated  financial
statements  and schedule of Komag,  Incorporated  included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 29, 1996.


                                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Jose, California
March 7, 1997
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned officer of Wellman, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies
that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is
provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be a
part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.

Date: March 15, 2005


                                        /s/ Thomas M. Duff
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Chief Executive Officer