alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                       |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/      Daniel L. Baxter                                                  |   |   |   |
| Daniel      L. BaxterChief      Executive OfficerAugust      11, 2008 |   |   |   |

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Victoriano Sanchez, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 888]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J.), rendered on or about March 24, 2004, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur—Saxe, J.E, Marlow, Nardelli, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned Jacob Hiller, the Secretary and Treasurer of Terrapin Enterprises,
      Inc. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for
      the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on
      Form
      10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
      November 13, 2006


By: 
                /s/ Jacob HillerName:Jacob
                HillerTitle:Secretary
                  and Treasurer
                (Principal
                  Financial and Accounting
                  Officer)


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          14,879
<SECURITIES>                                   198,799
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,953
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,259
<INVENTORY>                                     29,021
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               323,158
<PP&E>                                         543,842
<DEPRECIATION>                                 214,668
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 686,315
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,940
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           507
<OTHER-SE>                                     574,057
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   686,315
<SALES>                                        512,248
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               512,248
<CGS>                                          314,762
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  314,762
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,546
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,519
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                135,219
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,809
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            106,815
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   106,815
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.14
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 10, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 10, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0230. DORANNE B. SATTERLEE v. CHADWICK HART.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

12FV0833
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket Nos. 38954/38955

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

LAURA KRISTIN BAKER,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2012 Unpublished Opinion No. 302

Filed: January 3, 2012

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Darla S. Williamson, District Judge. 

Judgments of conviction and concurrent, unified sentences of ten years, with 

minimum periods of confinement of two and one-half years, for possession of 

methamphetamine with intent to deliver, affirmed.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth A. Allred, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Jason M. Gray, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

In separate cases, consolidated on appeal, Laura Kristin Baker was convicted of 

possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver, Idaho Code § 37-2732(a). The district 

court sentenced Baker to concurrent, unified terms of ten years, with minimum periods of 

confinement of two and one-half years. Baker appeals, contending that her sentences are 

excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Baker’s judgments of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
Case 2:10-cv-03939-WJM -MF Document 7 Filed 10/06/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 46
Case 2:10-cv-03939-WJM -MF Document 7 Filed 10/06/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 47
Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Board of Directors

Velocity Asset Management, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of Velocity Asset Management, Inc. of our report dated April 12, 2005,
related to the consolidated balance sheets of Velocity Asset Management, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004.






/s/ Cowan and Gunteski & Co., P.A.

Toms River, New Jersey


April 12, 2005
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Craft College Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Pat Castillo, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of May, 2008.

BY:
/s/ PAT CASTILLO                        Pat Castillo, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer**
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14
PROMULGATED UNDER
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 /s/ Roger MoodyRoger MoodyChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
S06Y0114.

#### IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM W. GARDNER.

(621 SE2d 427)

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of a special master who was appointed following the filing of a Formal Complaint by the State Bar. The Formal Complaint alleged, and the special master found, that Respondent William W. Gardner violated Rules 1.3, 1.4 and 1.16 (d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, which are found in Bar Rule 4-102 (d). The special master recommends imposition of the maximum penalty of disbarment for Gardner’s violations. We agree.

The State Bar filed a Formal Complaint against Gardner who has been a member of the Bar since 1979. Despite acknowledging service of the Formal Complaint, Gardner failed to respond and the following facts were deemed admitted by the special master pursuant to Bar Rule 4-212 (a): a client hired Gardner in September 2003 to represent her regarding claims arising from construction defects in her home; the client paid Gardner $2,500 as an advance retainer but Gardner performed no work on the client’s claim; in response to her repeated inquiries into the status of her case, Gardner repeatedly acknowledged to the client that he had yet to begin work but assured her that he would do so promptly; despite his assurances, he failed to take any action with regard to the client’s claim and never contacted her again; by so doing, he essentially terminated his attorney-client relationship with the client, but did not officially withdraw from representing her; and although Gardner never earned any portion of the advanced retainer the client paid to him, he failed to refund any portion of those funds.

Considering the entire record, we find that Gardner knowingly violated Rules 1.3,1.4 and 1.16 (d) of Bar Rule 4-102 (d) and that his client sustained injury or potential injury as a result of his violation of his duty to her. We find no mitigating circumstances and note in aggravation that Gardner has prior disciplinary offenses. See *In the Matter of Gardner,*265 Ga. 482 (458 SE2d 355) (1995) (imposing upon Gardner a six-month suspension with conditions on reinstatement for violations of Standards 22, 44 and 68 of former Rule 4-102 (d)). Accordingly, we accept the recommendation of the special master that disbarment is the appropriate sanction in this case and order that the name of William W. Gardner be removed from the rolls of persons *822entitled to practice law in the State of Georgia. Gardner is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Decided October 24, 2005.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Gene Chapman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*Disbarred.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before March 30, 2009 to be assured of consideration. 

## Office of Financial Stability 

*OMB Number:*                     1505-0210.                 

*Type of Review:*                     Extension.                 

*Title:*                     Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) Capital Purchase Program (CPP) Monthly Survey.                 

*Description:*                     Authorized under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (EESA) of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-343), the Department of the Treasury has implemented several aspects of the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Among these components is a voluntary Capital Purchase Program (CPP) under which the Department may purchase qualifying capital in U.S. banking organizations. The Treasury invested capital through this program in over 250 financial institutions. As part of this program, Treasury would like to track how the capital is being used, and whether these capital injections are having the desired effect of ensuring liquidity within the banking system and thereby increasing lending activity. The Treasury will be conducting evaluations using quarterly Call Report data supplied by these financial institutions to their primary regulator. However, in order to have a more frequent and timely snapshot of the current lending environment, Treasury is requesting the ability to conduct a monthly survey of the 20 largest institutions by loans outstanding in order to supplement the quarterly analysis.                 

*Respondents:*                     Businesses and other for-profit institutions.                 

*Estimated Total Reporting Burden:*                     12,000 hours.                 

*Clearance Officer:*                     Suzanne Tosini, Treasury Office of Financial Stability, 1801 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220, (202) 927-9627.                 

Robert Dahl, 

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-1628 Filed 1-26-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810-35-P
Case 2:11-cv-00623-KSH -PS Document 9 Filed 09/06/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 38
# Result 22.1
Exhibit
23  CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
   The Board
of Directors
 Medialink
Worldwide Incorporated:
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-27207 and 333-120956) on Forms S-8 and S-3, respectively, of Medialink
Worldwide Incorporated of our report dated March 15, 2005, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Medialink Worldwide Incorporated as of December
31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, which report appears in
the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Medialink Worldwide
Incorporated.
  (Signed)
KPMG LLP
 New York,
New York
 March 31,
2005
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Tory Levon Kirk, * From the Criminal District

 Court No. 5 of Dallas County,

 Trial Court No. F-0962440-L.

Vs. No. 11-13-00130-CR * July 11, 2013

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 McCall, J., and Willson, J.)

 This court has considered Tory Levon Kirk’s motion to dismiss his appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in 

accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1118 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1118

 To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to authorize spouses of 
servicemembers who incur a catastrophic injury or illness or die while 
in military service to terminate leases of premises and motor vehicles, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 10, 2019

 Ms. Warren (for herself, Mr. Portman, Ms. Sinema, Mr. Tillis, and Mr. 
Reed) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
                 to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to authorize spouses of 
servicemembers who incur a catastrophic injury or illness or die while 
in military service to terminate leases of premises and motor vehicles, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gold Star Spouses and Spouses of 
Injured Servicemembers Leasing Relief Expansion Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF LEASES OF PREMISES AND MOTOR VEHICLES OF 
              SERVICEMEMBERS WHO INCUR CATASTROPHIC INJURY OR ILLNESS 
              OR DIE WHILE IN MILITARY SERVICE.

    (a) Catastrophic Injuries and Illnesses.--Subsection (a) of section 
305 of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 3955), as amended 
by section 301 of the Veterans Benefits and Transition Act of 2018 
(Public Law 115-407), is further amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph:
            ``(4) Catastrophic injury or illness of lessee.--The spouse 
        of the lessee on a lease described in subsection (b) may 
        terminate the lease during the one-year period beginning on the 
        date on which the lessee incurs a catastrophic injury or 
        illness (as that term is defined in section 439(g) of title 37, 
        United States Code), if the lessee incurs the catastrophic 
        injury or illness during a period of military service or while 
        performing full-time National Guard duty, active Guard and 
        Reserve duty, or inactive-duty training (as such terms are 
        defined in section 101(d) of title 10, United States Code).''.
    (b) Deaths.--Paragraph (3) of such subsection is amended by 
striking ``in subsection (b)(1)'' and inserting ``in subsection (b)''.
                                 <all>
```
```
EXHIBIT 32.2
```

```
 
```

```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
```

```
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
```

```
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
```

```
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
```

```
 
```

```
In connection with the Quarterly Report of June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
```

```
 
```

```
(1)           The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
```

```
 
```

```
(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
```

```
 
```

```
 
```

```
 
```

```
Dated:  August 19, 2008                                                                    By: /s/ TAMER MUFTIZADE
```

```
                                                                                                               
```

```
                                                                                                                TAMER MUFTIZADE
```

```
                                                                                                                Chief Financial Officer
```