alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of June 30, 2009 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dateindicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to hisknowledge:

 

(1)        The report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 

 

Dated:  August 14, 2009                                            By: /s/  Tamer Muftizade

                                               

                                                                                    TAMERMUFTIZADE

                                                                                    ChiefFinancial Officer
# table149_q15.5_state
Case 2:11-cv-00900-DMC -JAD Document 1 Filed 02/16/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1
S06A1061.

#### WOODRUFF et al. v. GOULD et al.

(632 SE2d 662)

Decided July 13, 2006.

*Reynolds, McArthur & Horne, W. Carl Reynolds, Katherine L. McArthur, Bradley J. Survant,*for appellants.

Thompson, Justice.

Plaintiffs filed this medical malpractice case in Fulton County, the county of residence of the defendant physician. Two years later, the physician’s professional group moved to transfer the case to Gwinnett County pursuant to OCGA§ 9-10-31 (c). Plaintiffs opposed the motion, asserting the statute was unconstitutional. The motion to transfer was granted, but the order granting the motion was certified for immediate review.1 We granted plaintiffs’ application for interlocutory review to determine (1) whether OCGA § 9-10-31 (c) is constitutional and, if so, (2) whether it could be applied retroactively. In the meantime, in another case, we answered the first part of our inquiry in the negative, holding that OCGA § 9-10-31 (c) was unconstitutional because it empowers a non-resident defendant to change venue. *EHCA Cartersville, LLC v. Turner,*280 Ga. 333 (626 SE2d 482) (2006).

We adhere to our ruling in *Turner,*finding OCGA § 9-10-31 (c) unconstitutional. It follows that it was error to transfer this case to the Superior Court of Gwinnett County pursuant to OCGA§ 9-10-31 (c). The inquiry concerning the retroactive application of the statute is moot.

Upon the filing of the remittitur from this Court, the Superior Court of Gwinnett County shall enter an order returning this case to its original forum.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*758*Hall, Booth, Smith & Slover, Jack G. Slover, Jr., Shaun M. Daugherty, William P. Keenan,*for appellees.

1

 The ease was transferred to the Superior Court of Gwinnett County which issued an order to stay the proceedings pending our decision in this appeal.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public AccountingFirm**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-61940 and333-66982 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-43334,333-53970, 333-54932, 333-105215 and 333-124777 on Form S-8of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) of our report on the consolidatedfinancial statements of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2006and 2005 dated August 2, 2007 (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the adoption ofStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) *Share-Based Payment* discussed in Note 10 and the restatementdiscussed in Note 2), and our report relating to management’s report on theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting dated August 2,2007 (which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Sonus Networks, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

August 2, 2007

----
#### Kenneth D. FARROW, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2012-7074.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 7, 2013.

Kenneth M. Carpenter, Carpenter, Chartered of Topeka, KS, argued for claimant-appellant.

Nicholas Jabbour, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-*978appellee. With him on the brief were Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Martin F. Hockey, Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief were David J. Barrans, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and Tracey Warren, Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC.

MOORE, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Salary.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), G. Kent Plunkett, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Bryce Chicoyne, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our best knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of the Report, nor is it to be deemed to be
filed for any purpose whatsoever.

Date: June 13, 2008



/s/ G. Kent PlunkettG. Kent Plunkett Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer


Date: June 13, 2008



/s/ Bryce ChicoyneBryce Chicoyne Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31
  
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
  I,
Shawn Perger, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting officer of
Striker Energy Corp., hereby certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10Q-SB.
  2.  Based on my
knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.
 
 3.  Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows as of, and for, the periods
presented in this quarterly report.
 
 4.  The other
certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14) and we have:
 
 a)  designed such
disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating
to registrant, including its subsidiaries, if any, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the
 period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;
 
 b)  evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90
days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date");
and
 
 c)  presented in
this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date.
  5.  The other
certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,
to our auditors and the audit committee of our board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)  that there
were no significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect our ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have further advised
 our  auditors that
there we are not aware of any material weaknesses in our internal controls;
and
 
 b)  that there
was no fraud, whether or not material, that involved our management or other
employees who have a significant role in our internal controls.
 
 6.  The other
certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report that there
were no significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation.
  
 Striker Energy Corp., a Nevada
corporation
  Date: 
July 9,, 2008    By:/s/
Shawn Perger, President, CEO,  T reasurer,
Principal Accounting Officer and Director
906 A.2d 1116

#### IN THE MATTER OF GARY L. EDELSON, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 28, 2006.

ORDER

GARY L. EDELSON of RED BANK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, and who thereafter was temporarily suspended from the practice of law by Order of this Court filed November 17, 2005, and who remains suspended at this time, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that GARY L. EDELSON is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
#### In the Matter of Amani T. and Another, Children Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Lydia T., Appellant; Seamen’s Society for Children and Families et al., Respondents, et al., Respondent.

[822 NYS2d 540]

Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen Alpert, J.), entered on or about March 12, 2004, which, after fact-finding determinations of permanent neglect, insofar as appealed from, terminated respondent-appellant’s parental rights to the subject children and committed the children’s custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The findings of permanent neglect are supported by clear and convincing evidence of respondent’s frequent missed visits or lateness *(see Matter of Lenny R.,*22 AD3d 240 [2005], *lv denied*6 NY3d 708 [2006]), and failure to plan for the children’s future by, inter alia, chronically falling back into substance abuse, for which she was incarcerated during the pendency of these proceedings, despite the agency’s diligent efforts referring her to drug treatment programs *(see Matter of Christopher Jamar*V., 12 AD3d 314 [2004]; *Matter of Jonathan R.M.,*26 AD3d 205 [2006]). Respondent was not relieved of her obligation to plan for the children’s future while incarcerated *(see Matter of Gregory B.,*74 NY2d 77, 90 [1989]). A preponderance of the evidence supports the finding that the children’s best interests would be better served by freeing them for adoption by their foster parents, with whom they have resided for several years and bonded *(see Lenny R.,*supra;*Jonathan R.M., supra),*rather than respondent’s mother *(see Matter of Jennifer A., 225*AD2d 204, 206 [1996], *lv denied*91 NY2d 809 [1998]). Concur— Andrias, J.E, Marlow, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
ESTABLISHMENT DATA ESTABLISHMENT DATA

EARNINGS EARNINGS

NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

B-17. Average hourly earnings, excluding overtime1 of production employees on manufacturing payrolls

Industry May

2011

June

2011

Apr.

2012

May

2012 p

June

2012 p

Manufacturing ............................................................................. $18.03 $17.99 $18.27 $18.14 $18.18

Durable goods .......................................................................... 19.14 19.08 19.26 19.13 19.16

Wood products ........................................................................ 14.19 14.23 14.15 14.08 2 ( )

Nonmetallic mineral products ............................................... 17.03 17.16 17.15 17.16 2 ( )

Primary metals ........................................................................ 18.61 18.67 19.25 18.89 2 ( )

Fabricated metal products ..................................................... 17.24 17.18 17.28 17.30 2 ( )

Machinery ................................................................................. 18.38 18.32 19.02 18.98 2 ( )

Computer and electronic products ....................................... 22.72 22.45 22.97 22.71 2 ( )

Electrical equipment and appliances ................................... 17.01 17.00 17.08 17.03 2 ( )

Transportation equipment ..................................................... 24.19 24.06 23.45 23.24 2 ( )

Furniture and related products ............................................. 14.61 14.51 14.78 14.90 2 ( )

Miscellaneous manufacturing ............................................... 16.21 16.12 16.47 16.35 2 ( )

Nondurable goods ................................................................... 16.26 16.26 16.66 16.52 16.53

Food manufacturing ............................................................... 13.85 13.83 14.33 14.30 2 ( )

Textile mills .............................................................................. 13.21 13.13 13.11 12.95 2 ( )

Textile product mills ................................................................ 11.79 11.86 12.15 12.39 2 ( )

Apparel ..................................................................................... 11.23 11.34 12.44 12.52 2 ( )

Paper and paper products ..................................................... 19.17 19.09 19.45 19.13 2 ( )

Printing and related support activities ................................. 16.76 16.81 16.74 16.67 2 ( )

Petroleum and coal products ................................................ 29.52 29.59 29.37 29.55 2 ( )

Chemicals ................................................................................ 20.45 20.60 20.86 20.53 2 ( )

Plastics and rubber products ................................................ 15.14 15.19 15.37 15.17 2 ( )

154

1 Derived by assuming that overtime hours are paid at the rate of

time and one-half.

2 Data not available.

p = preliminary.

NOTE: Data are currently projected from March 2011 benchmark

levels. When more recent benchmark data are introduced with

the release of January 2013 estimates, all unadjusted data from

April 2011 forward are subject to revision.
Exhibit 10.22.1


Exhibit 10.22.1


 James J. Pieczynski
First Amendment to
Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement
This first Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (“Amendment”) is entered into as of the 1st day of January, 2013 (the “Amendment Date”) by and among CapitalSource Inc., a Delaware corporation (“CapitalSource” or “Parent”), CapitalSource Bank, a California industrial bank (the “Company” or “Bank” and, along with CapitalSource, the “Employer,” as applicable) and James J. Pieczynski, an individual (the “Executive”); 
Whereas, the Executive is currently employed as Chief Executive Officer of CapitalSource and President of the Bank pursuant to that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between CapitalSource, the Company and the Executive, dated as of September 28, 2012 (the “Agreement”); and 
Whereas, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to revise the definition of “Good Reason” as described in this Amendment.   
Now, Therefore, the parties agree that the Agreement be amended as follows, all effective as of the Amendment Date:  
1.By deleting clause (iii) of the definition of “Good Reason” in Section 25 of the Agreement and replacing it with the following:
“(iii) a material diminution in the Executive's title, authority, responsibilities or duties (not including, by itself, removal of authority or responsibility for any single aspect of his position and not including, by itself, removal of the Executive as a member of the Bank Board arising out of or in connection with any direct or indirect order, request, mandate or other instruction of a Regulator); provided, however, that in connection with or subsequent to CapitalSource becoming a bank holding company the Executive's transition to the second most senior officer of the Parent shall not be deemed a material diminution as long as the chief executive officer of the Bank on the Effective Date of this Agreement is the most senior officer of the Parent;” 
2.Except as expressly amended as provided in this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
3.This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 
[Signature Page Follows]









In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have duly executed and delivered this Amendment, or have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered on their behalf. 
CapitalSource Inc.     
By: /s/  William G. Byrnes_
Name: William G. Byrnes
Title: Chairman of the Board     
CapitalSource Bank     
By: /s/ Douglas H. Lowrey        
Name: Douglas Hayes Lowrey
Title: Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board    
Executive
/s/ James J. Pieczynski        
James J. Pieczynski
Case 2:11-cv-00622-KSH -PS Document 7 Filed 06/23/11 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 35
Case 2:11-cv-00622-KSH -PS Document 7 Filed 06/23/11 Page 2 of 13 PageID: 36
Case 2:11-cv-00622-KSH -PS Document 7 Filed 06/23/11 Page 3 of 13 PageID: 37
Case 2:11-cv-00622-KSH -PS Document 7 Filed 06/23/11 Page 4 of 13 PageID: 38
Case 2:11-cv-00622-KSH -PS Document 7 Filed 06/23/11 Page 5 of 13 PageID: 39
Case 2:11-cv-00622-KSH -PS Document 7 Filed 06/23/11 Page 6 of 13 PageID: 40
Case 2:11-cv-00622-KSH -PS Document 7 Filed 06/23/11 Page 7 of 13 PageID: 41
Case 2:11-cv-00622-KSH -PS Document 7 Filed 06/23/11 Page 8 of 13 PageID: 42
Case 2:11-cv-00622-KSH -PS Document 7 Filed 06/23/11 Page 9 of 13 PageID: 43
Case 2:11-cv-00622-KSH -PS Document 7 Filed 06/23/11 Page 10 of 13 PageID: 44
Case 2:11-cv-00622-KSH -PS Document 7 Filed 06/23/11 Page 11 of 13 PageID: 45
Case 2:11-cv-00622-KSH -PS Document 7 Filed 06/23/11 Page 12 of 13 PageID: 46
Case 2:11-cv-00622-KSH -PS Document 7 Filed 06/23/11 Page 13 of 13 PageID: 47
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, July 20, 2009, 8:30 a.m. to July 21, 2009, 5 p.m., Doubletree Hotel, 1515 Rhode Island Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20005 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 26, 2009, 74 FR 30597-30598.                

The meeting will be held at the Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814. The meeting dates and time remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: June 30, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-16120 Filed 7-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00020-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.L.M.-F., A.M., J.A.-F., 

N.A.-F., AND E.A.-F., CHILDREN

From the 74th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-3287-3

ORDER

The State’s brief in this appeal of a trial court’s termination of parental rights order 

was due April 18, 2017. By motion filed on April 13, 2017, the State requests an additional 

21 days to prepare its brief because the State has been working on “other matters,” 

mentioning briefs recently filed in appeals in criminal cases. 

Appeals in termination of parental right cases are accelerated and should be 

brought to a final disposition by this Court within 180 days from the date the notice of 

appeal is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4(a)(1); TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a). Thus, briefs, 

including the State’s, in termination of parental rights appeals should be given priority 

over “other matters.”
In the Interest of A.L.M.-F., A.M., J.A.-F., N.A.-F., and E.A.-F., Children Page 2

Accordingly, the State’s motion for an extension of time to file its brief is denied. 

The State’s brief is due May 8, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion denied

Order issued and filed April 26, 2017

Publish