alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 130 (Thursday, July 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 32894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16291]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of the Census


2010 Census Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of the Census (Census Bureau) is giving notice of a 
meeting of the 2010 Census Advisory Committee. The Committee will 
address policy, research, and technical issues related to 2010 
Decennial Census Programs. Last-minute changes to the agenda are 
possible, which could prevent giving advance notification of schedule 
changes.

DATES: July 21, 2009. On July 21, the meeting will begin at 
approximately 8:30 a.m. and end at approximately 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the U.S. Census Bureau 
Auditorium and Conference Center, 4600 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, 
Maryland 20746.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeri Green, Committee Liaison Officer, 
Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Room 8H182, 4600 Silver 
Hill Road, Suitland, Maryland 20746, telephone 301-763-6590. For TTY 
callers, please use the Federal Relay Service 1-800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 2010 Census Advisory Committee is 
composed of a Chair, Vice-Chair, and 20 member organizations--all 
appointed by the Secretary of Commerce. The Committee considers the 
goals of the decennial census, including the American Community Survey 
and related programs, and users' needs for information provided by the 
decennial census from the perspective of outside data users and other 
organizations having a substantial interest and expertise in the 
conduct and outcome of the decennial census. The Committee has been 
established in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Title 5, United States Code, Appendix 2, Section10(a)(b)).
    A brief period will be set aside at the meeting for public comment. 
However, individuals with extensive statements for the record must 
submit them in writing to the Census Bureau Committee Liaison Officer 
named above at least three working days prior to the meeting. Seating 
is available to the public on a first-come, first-served basis.
    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to the Census Bureau Committee Liaison Officer as 
soon as known, and preferably two weeks prior to the meeting.
    Due to increased security and for access to the meeting, please 
call 301-763-3231 upon arrival at the Census Bureau on the day of the 
meeting. A photo ID must be presented in order to receive your 
visitor's badge. Visitors are not allowed beyond the first floor.

    Dated: July 2, 2009.
Thomas L. Mesenbourg,
Acting Director, Bureau of the Census.
[FR Doc. E9-16291 Filed 7-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Diet Coffee, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Adam J. Engel, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
      Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      February19, 2008




/s/
      Adam J. Engel


Adam
      J.
      Engel, President, Chief Executive Officer,


Chief
      Financial Officer and Director
#### TDH-Berkshire Incorporated, Appellant, v Joseph Korff et al., Respondents.

[823 NYS2d 20]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane S. Solomon, J.), entered August 29, 2005, dismissing the complaint upon the prior grant of summary judgment to defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff’s president, a real estate broker licensed in New York and Massachusetts but not in New Jersey, sought to recover a commission for his efforts in finding a purchaser for a parcel of New Jersey property owned by defendants. New Jersey precludes real estate brokers from bringing actions for the collection of brokerage commissions in their courts without alleging and proving that such brokers are duly licensed at the time that the cause of action arose (NJ Stat Ann § 45:15-3). Under the grouping-of-contacts analysis applicable in any choice-of-law situation *(see Equis Corp. v Mack-Cali Realty Corp.,*6 AD3d 264, 266-267 [2004]), plaintiff contends that New York law should be applied to this case because he is licensed as a real estate broker here, defendants reside and are headquartered here, all information concerning the subject property came through defendants’ New York offices, the final sale of the property was closed here, and New York has a paramount interest in seeing that its licensed brokers are compensated.

*438However, among the traditional factors in a choice-of-law analysis involving a property transaction, the heaviest weight is given to the location of the property being transferred *{id.*at 267). In light of the out-of-state locus of this property, as well as plaintiffs admission that over 100 meetings were held at the property site—well more than the “single act” required to trigger the application of the New Jersey licensing statute *(see Interglobal Realty Corp. v American Std.,*174 AD2d 436, 436 [1991], *lv denied*78 NY2d 858 [1991])—New Jersey law must apply. Plaintiffs claim is thus barred since he was not licensed as a real estate broker in New Jersey at the time the cause of action arose. Concur—Saxe, J.E, Marlow, Nardelli, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
@misc{1151236,
  author = {Linda Crown and David Sefcik and Lisa Warfield},
  title = {Uniform laws and regulations in the areas of legal metrology and fuel quality:},
  year = {2018},
  month = {2018-12-01 05:12:00},
  publisher = {, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.HB.130-2019},
  language = {en},
}
907 A.2d 1011

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ERNEST DANIELS, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

September 21, 2006.

ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, limited solely to the sentencing issue raised by defendant, and the matter *351is summarily remanded to the trial court for resentencing in light *of State v. Natale,*184 *N.J.*458, 878 A.2d 724 (2005).
Case 3:11-cv-00890-MLC-LHG Document 48 Filed 11/07/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 292
Case 3:11-cv-00890-MLC-LHG Document 48 Filed 11/07/12 Page 2 of 9 PageID: 293
Case 3:11-cv-00890-MLC-LHG Document 48 Filed 11/07/12 Page 3 of 9 PageID: 294
Case 3:11-cv-00890-MLC-LHG Document 48 Filed 11/07/12 Page 4 of 9 PageID: 295
Case 3:11-cv-00890-MLC-LHG Document 48 Filed 11/07/12 Page 5 of 9 PageID: 296
Case 3:11-cv-00890-MLC-LHG Document 48 Filed 11/07/12 Page 6 of 9 PageID: 297
Case 3:11-cv-00890-MLC-LHG Document 48 Filed 11/07/12 Page 7 of 9 PageID: 298
Case 3:11-cv-00890-MLC-LHG Document 48 Filed 11/07/12 Page 8 of 9 PageID: 299
Case 3:11-cv-00890-MLC-LHG Document 48 Filed 11/07/12 Page 9 of 9 PageID: 300
Case 2:11-cr-00075-DMC Document 14 Filed 08/03/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 36
Case 2:11-cr-00075-DMC Document 14 Filed 08/03/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 37
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7374

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GRADY CANADY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CR-98-438, CA-00-1962-A)

Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 30, 2001

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Grady Canady, Appellant Pro Se. Dabney P. Langhorne, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could

have been given to prison officials for mailing. See Fed. R. App.

P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

2

PER CURIAM:

Grady Canady appeals the district court’s order denying his 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) motion. We dismiss the appeal

for lack of jurisdiction because Canady’s notice of appeal was not

timely filed.

When the United States is a party, parties are accorded sixty

days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to

note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district

court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This

appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v.

Director, Dep’t of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting

United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on May 7,

2001. Canady’s notice of appeal is deemed to be filed no earlier

than August 9, 2001.* Because Canady failed to file a timely

notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the

appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
3

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Robert E. Swanson, certify that: 

1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Energy T Fund, LLC; 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal  control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

| Dated: | August 7, 2007                          |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                    |   |
|   | /s/ ROBERT E. SWANSON                   |   |
|   |                                         |   |
| Name:  | Robert E. Swanson                       |   |
| Title: | President and Chief   Executive Officer |   |
|   | (Principal Executive   Officer)         |   |

20
#### Maria Nancy Pelaez et al., Respondents, v Laura Seide et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[852 NYS2d 800]

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the appellants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them because they failed to tender evidence sufficient to entitle them to judgment as a matter of law *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Questions of fact exist as to whether the appellants owned or controlled the subject property during the time when *619the infant plaintiffs sustained their injuries *(see Ellers v Horwitz Family Ltd. Partnership,*36 AD3d 849 [2007]). Mastro, J.P., Covello, Eng and Belen, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. Section1350**

 

In connection with the filing of the AnnualReport on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”) by ClickSoftware Technologies Ltd. (the "Company"),the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)        	the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        	the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.65


                    [ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED LETTERHEAD]


March 12, 2001


Mr. Henrik Slipsager
President and Chief Executive Officer
ABM Industries, Incorporated
160 Pacific Avenue, Suite 222
San Francisco, California 94111

  Re:   First Amendment ("Amendment") of Division Executive
        Employment Agreement dated November 1, 2000 ("Agreement")


Dear Henrik,

Your Employment Agreement effective November 1, 2000, is hereby amended as
follows, pursuant to Resolution No. 00-036 of the ABM Industries Incorporated
Board of Directors (Resolved December 19, 2000):

Paragraph X. SPECIAL PROVISIONS

        2.      BONUS

                (a)     Such Bonus for each Fiscal Year shall be: (i) 0.0649% of
                        the Company's Profit plus (ii) 1.8176 % of the amount of
                        any increase in the Company's Profit over the previous
                        Fiscal Year's Profit, all on a pro-rata basis.

This Amendment shall be effective as of November 1, 2000. In all other respects
the Agreement shall remain unchanged.

Please sign both original copies of this letter, returning one to me and
retaining one fully executed original for your records.

Sincerely,


/s/ DONNA M. DELL
-----------------------------------------
Donna M. Dell, Esq.
Senior Vice President of Human Resources
and Chief Employment Counsel


I agree to the foregoing:



/s/ HENRIK C. SLIPSAGER                         Dated: 3/12/01
-----------------------------------------              -------------------------
Henrik C. Slipsager



New York Stock Exchange Symbol: ABM
36 Occupational Outlook Quarterly • Fall 2012

New school year, old story: Education pays

Unemployment rates and earnings for full-time wage and salary workers 

ages 25 and older, by educational attainment, 2011

Wondering if your studies will pay off? Recent data from 

the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) suggest that 

they will. As past studies have shown, as workers’ level 

of education increases, their earnings rise and unemployment rates fall. 

The chart groups workers’ earnings and unemployment by their highest level of educational attainment. 

Workers with a bachelor’s degree, for example, earned 

about $415 more a week than workers whose highest 

level of education is a high school diploma. And the rate 

of unemployment for workers with a bachelor’s degree 

was about half that of those with no education beyond 

high school.

For students in graduate school, the payoff for a 

degree might be even greater. Workers with a professional degree, such as lawyers and physicians, earned 

about $612 more a week than did workers with a bachelor’s degree—and over $1,000 more per week than 

workers who have a high school diploma as their highest 

level of education. Plus, at 2.4 percent, the unemployment rate for workers with a professional degree was also 

the lowest of any education level.

The numbers in the chart below are medians—

meaning that half of all workers earned more than that 

amount, and half earned less. As the chart indicates, 

postponing work for school can pay off. But there are 

some financial drawbacks. Students often forego a 

full-time paycheck while they are in school. And when 

estimating the financial benefit of additional education, 

students who take out loans to pay for school should 

consider the amount they will be obligated to repay.

Data come from a special supplement to the BLS 

Current Population Survey. For more information, write 

to the BLS Division of Labor Force Statistics, 2 Massachusetts Avenue NE., Suite 4675, Washington, DC 

20212; call (202) 691-6378; or visit www.bls.gov/CPS.

451

638

719

768

1,053

1,263

1,665

1,551

Less than a

high school diploma

High school diploma

Some college,

no degree

Associate’sdegree

Bachelor'sdegree

Master's degree

Professionaldegree

Doctoraldegree

Median weekly earnings ($)

14.1

9.4

8.7

6.8

4.9

3.6

2.4

2.5

Unemployment rate (%)

Average, workers at all levels: 7.6% Average, workers at all levels: $797

Source: BLS, Current Population Survey.
#### STATE EX REL. ROY F. GAGNON v. LEO F. UTECHT.1, 2,

March 3, 1950.

No. 35,214.

See State ex rel. Gagnon v. Utecht, 227 Minn. 589, 34 N. W. (2d) 721.

*Boy F. Gagnon, pro se.*

*J. A. A. Bumquist,*Attorney General, and *Ralph A. Stone,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

1

 Reported in 41 N. W. (2d) 579.

2

 Certiorari denied, 339 U. S. 988, 70 S. Ct. 1012, 94 L. ed. —.

Per Curiam.

This matter comes before us on an appeal from an order of the district court of Washington county denying relator’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

This matter was heretofore before us on an appeal from an order denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and the order was affirmed by us in State ex rel. Gagnon v. Utecht, 227 Minn. 589, 34 N. W. (2d) 721. The grounds alleged in the present petition are almost identical with those considered in the former case. There is no merit to this petition or to this appeal.

Affirmed.
Case 2:11-cv-00525-CCC -JAD Document 38 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 243
Case 2:11-cv-00525-CCC -JAD Document 38 Filed 06/28/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 244
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11776 and #11777]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of  Alaska (FEMA-1843-DR), dated 06/11/2009.

*Incident:*                         Flooding and Ice Jams.                    

*Incident Period:*                         04/28/2009 and continuing through 05/31/2009.                    

*Effective Date:*                         05/31/2009.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         08/10/2009.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         03/11/2010.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the  State of Alaska, dated 06/11/2009 is hereby amended to establish the incident period for  this                           ( print page 33487)                        disaster as beginning 04/28/2009 and continuing through 05/31/2009.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-16393 Filed 7-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gulf & Orient Steamship Company, Ltd. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), we, Michael Vardakis, President, and Melissa Ladakis, Secretary and Treasurer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:August 13, 2010By:/s/Michael VardakisMichael Vardakis, President  and Director  Date:August 13, 2010By:/s/Melissa LadakisMelissa Ladakis ,Secretary,  Treasurer and Director