alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
909 A.2d 722

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TYREE PORTER, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

October 12, 2006.

ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, limited solely to the sentencing issue raised by defendant, and the matter is summarily remanded to the trial court for resentencing in light of *State v. Pierce,*188 *N.J.*155, 902 A.2d 1195 (2006).
Opinion filed July 8, 2010



## In The



# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________



### No. 11

- 10

- 00068

- CV

__________

RANDY MULKEY , Appellant

V.

IGN ACIO DE LOS SANTOS ET AL , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 70 th District Court

Ector County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. A

- 122,838

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Randy Mulkey has filed in this court a motion to dismiss his appeal. In his motion,

Mulkey states that the parties have resolved their differences. The motion is granted, and the

appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

July 8, 2010

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Harold P. Mintz, 

Plaintiff,

 v. Civ. Action No. 10-3937 (KSH)

Semprac Laboratories, et al. 

Defendants. ORDER

Katharine S. Hayden, U.S.D.J.

This matter having come before the Court upon its review of the docket; and the docket

reflecting that this case was removed from the New Jersey Superior Court based upon the federal

question jurisdiction, Docket No. 1 at 2, Paragraph 2; and the docket reflecting that defendants

have filed motions to dismiss all claims, including the claims based upon federal statutes, Docket

Nos. 22 and 24; and the plaintiff having submitted a letter dated August 23, 2010 and a motion

dated August 27, 2010, stating that he seeks to dismiss and will not re-institute his claims under

RICO and the Hobbs Act, and seeking remand Docket Nos. 25 and 27; and it therefore appearing

that he does not oppose the motions to dismiss insofar as they seek to dismiss the federal RICO

and Hobbs Act claims; and the Court therefore dismissing the federal claims; and although the

defendants assert that the plaintiff has also brought a claim for criminal bankruptcy fraud, a

review of the allegations disclosing that the assertion is made in the context of a fraud claim and,

in any event, federal criminal bankruptcy fraud does not provide a basis for a civil cause of action

and hence does not provide a claim upon which relief could be granted; and the Court declining

to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims and terminating the remaining

portions of the motions to dismiss without prejudice to the defendants right to re-file such

Case 2:10-cv-03937-KSH-PS Document 30 Filed 09/09/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 506
motions to dismiss the state law claims state court; and nothing herein constituting a ruling

concerning the merits of such motions

IT IS THEREFORE ON THIS 9th day of September, 2010

ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss the plaintiff's RICO and Hobbs Act

Claims [Docket Nos. 22 and 24] is granted in part and the plaintiff's RICO and Hobbs Act claims

are dismissed with prejudice;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines to exercise supplemental

jurisdiction over the plaintiff's state law claims and the defendants' motion to dismiss the state

law claims are terminated without prejudice to the defendants' right to file motions to dismiss the

plaintiff's state law claims in state court; and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to remand [Docket No. 27] is granted and

the case is remanded to the New Jersey Superior Court, Bergen County; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is closed.

/s/Katharine S. Hayden

Hon. Katharine S. Hayden

Case 2:10-cv-03937-KSH-PS Document 30 Filed 09/09/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 507
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 13.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Annual Report of GigaMedia Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Winston
Hsia, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: July 15, 2003
                                                     By: /s/ Winston Hsia

                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Winston Hisa
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

*        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
         the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and
         will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
         Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       88
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;      and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              | MEPRO      SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                              |                             |   |
| Dated:       August 16, 2010 | By:                         | /s/      W. Craig Turner |   |
|                              |                             |  W.      Craig Turner |
|                              |                             |  Chief      Executive Officer |

----
S06Y0306.

#### IN THE MATTER OF MARK SHERMAN FRASER.

(622 SE2d 337)

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the special master recommending that Respondent Mark Sherman Fraser be suspended for nine months with conditions on reinstatement for his violations of Rules 1.15 (I) (a) and (II) (b) of Bar Rule 4-102 (d) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct. A violation of either rule is punishable by disbarment. As neither party has requested review by the Review Panel, both parties have waived any right they may have under the rules to file exceptions with or make request for oral argument to this Court. Bar Rule 4-217 (c).

The special master signed the findings of fact and conclusions of law for this matter on December 6, 2004, subsequent to Fraser’s failure to respond to the State Bar’s formal complaint. A hearing, however, was held on January 5, 2005, at which Fraser did not dispute that between December 10, 2003 and December 17, 2003, he had written six checks in varying amounts totaling approximately $218 on his firm’s escrow account and that the checks were dishonored for insufficient funds. Subsequent to the hearing, the special master entered a Report and Recommendation based on the earlier findings of facts and conclusions of law.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the special master that, by his conduct in this matter, Fraser violated Rules 1.15 (I) (a) and (II) (b). Accordingly, for those violations, Fraser hereby is suspended from the practice of law for nine months. Furthermore, reinstatement shall only be by order of this Court and prior to any such reinstatement, Fraser must petition the Review Panel for certification for any request for readmission following nine months, and as a condition for any petition for reinstatement, Fraser must show that he has attended a current Ethics School program and *57submit an audit of his escrow account for the three-year period prior to July 7,2004. Fraser is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Decided November 21, 2005.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Gene Chapman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*Nine-month suspension with conditions upon reinstatement.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Exhibit 21.  Securities of Registrant

|Name of Subsidiary                                                                                      | Jurisdictionof Incorporation | Year
Acquiredof Formed | Percentage
of VotingSecurities Owned
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------- | ---------------------- | ------------------------------------
|ASI Data Services Inc                                                                                   | Maine                        | 1993                   | 100%                                
|Northeast Savings Bank, F.S.B. (and its 100% owned subsidiary, Northeast Financial Service Corporation) | Maine                        | 1987                   | 100%                                
|NBN Capital Trust                                                                                       | Delaware                     | 1999                   | 100%                                
|NBN Capital Trust II                                                                                    | Delaware                     | 2003                   | 100%                                
|NBN Capital Trust III                                                                                   | Delaware                     | 2003                   | 100%
44 Occupational Outlook Quarterly • Fall 2008

Through deductions in their paychecks, most workers know they pay a lot for health insurance. But 

they might not know that employers make even 

larger payments on their behalf. In March 2008, employers in private industry spent an average of $1.92 per hour 

per worker, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of 

Labor Statistics (BLS).

Exactly how much employers contribute varies by 

occupation. The chart shows average employer costs per 

hour worked in private industry for each of five major 

occupational groups. These costs for health benefits 

ranged from 90 cents per hour for service workers 

to $2.77 per hour for management, professional, and 

related occupations. 

Variations in hourly costs reflect, in part, the fact that 

workers in some occupations are more likely than those 

      

!LLWORKERS

3ERVICE

3ALESANDOFFICE

0RODUCTIONTRANSPORTATION

ANDMATERIALMOVING

.ATURALRESOURCESCONSTRUCTION

ANDMAINTENANCE

-ANAGEMENTPROFESSIONAL

ANDRELATED 











in others to be offered health insurance. Service workers, 

for example, have a lower incidence of health benefits 

coverage than do people in other occupations—and, as 

a result, employers’ average costs are lower for these 

workers.

Data in the chart are from the BLS National 

Compensation Survey. To learn more, write to the BLS 

Office of Compensation and Working Conditions, 2 

Massachusetts Avenue NE., Suite 4175, Washington, 

D.C. 20212; call (202) 691-6199; e-mail NCSinfo@bls.

gov; or visit online at www.bls.gov/ect.

For additional information about the types of benefits that employers offer, see “An overview of employee 

benefits” in the summer 2005 Quarterly, available online 

at www.bls.gov/opub/ooq/2005/summer/art02.pdf.

Health benefit costs by occupation: 

An employer’s perspective

Employer costs per hour worked for health insurance for workers 

in private industry, by major occupational group, March 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The notice published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on June 9, 2009 (74 FR 27294), indicated a July 9, 2009 effective date. The effective date for this publication will not be July 9, 2009. The effective date will be determined and published at a later date. All publications listed above will remain in effect until further notice.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Dora J. Elias, (757) 878-5379.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-16345 Filed 7-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
Case 2:11-cr-00101-JLL Document 11 Filed 05/13/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 20
Case 2:11-cr-00101-JLL Document 11 Filed 05/13/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 21
Case 2:11-cr-00101-JLL Document 11 Filed 05/13/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 22
EXHIBIT 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998

Subsidiary of Boddie-Noell Properties, Inc.:

     Subsidiary name:                Boddie-Noell Properties Limited Partnership
     State of organization:          Delaware
     Business name:                  Boddie-Noell Properties Limited Partnership

Subsidiaries of Boddie-Noell Properties Limited Partnership:

     Subsidiary name:                BNP Realty, LLC
     State of organization:          North Carolina
     Business name:                  BNP Realty, LLC

     Subsidiary name:                BNP/Chrysson Phase I, LLC
     State of organization:          North Carolina
     Business name:                  BNP/Chrysson Phase I, LLC

     Subsidiary name:                BNP/Chason Ridge, LLC
     State of organization:          North Carolina
     Business name:                  BNP/Chason Ridge, LLC

Subsidiary of BNP Realty, LLC:

     Subsidiary name:                BNP Management, Inc.
     State of organization:          North Carolina
     Business name:                  BNP Management, Inc.

                                      141
<PAGE>
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with this Quarterly Report of Network Communications, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 13, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Gerard P. Parker, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to my knowledge:






(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



















October
26, 2009 /s/ Gerard P.
Parker


Gerard P.
Parker


Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
HUGHES JUSTICE COMPLEX • TELEPHONE: (609) 633-8687• FAX: (609) 777-3607

 New Jersey Is An Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed on Recycled Paper and Recyclable

CHRIS CHRISTIE

Governor

State of New Jersey

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY

DIVISION OF LAW

CHRISTOPHER S. PORRINO

Attorney General

KIM GUADAGNO

Lt. Governor

25 MARKET STREET

PO Box 112

TRENTON, NJ 08625-0112

MICHELLE L. MILLER

Acting Director

December 15, 2017

Via CM/ECF

Hon. Lois H. Goodman, U.S.M.J.

Clarkson S. Fisher Building

& U.S. Courthouse

402 East State Street

Trenton, NJ 08608

Re: Mullin v. Balicki, et al. 

Docket No. 11-247 (FLW-LHG)

Dear Judge Goodman:

As Your Honor is aware, I represent defendant Officer 

Dimler in this matter. I received the Court’s notification that 

a telephonic status conference has been scheduled for Monday, 

December 18th at 9:30 a.m. I would like to advise the Court that 

I have a doctor’s appointment scheduled at that time and will 

not be at work for the rest of the day. For that reason, I am 

requesting that the conference be adjourned to a later date. 

Plaintiff’s counsel, Shelley Stangler, has consented to the

adjournment and was kind enough to propose some alternate dates 

for the conference. Both Ms. Stangler and I are available on 

December 19th, 20th, and 21st after 1:00 p.m. Ms. Stangler 

advised me that she is away from December 27th to January 9th of 

next year. 

Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 261 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 4680
I thank the Court for its consideration. 

Respectfully submitted,

CHRISTOPHER S. PORRINO

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY

By: s/ Gregory R. Bueno__________

Gregory R. Bueno

Deputy Attorney General 

C: Shelley Stangler, Esq. (via CM/ECF)

Case 3:11-cv-00247-FLW-LHG Document 261 Filed 12/15/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 4681
SAVVY
BUSINESS SUPPORT, INC.


 


SERIES
B STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT


 


SECTION
1. SUBSCRIPTION


 


The
undersigned purchaser hereby purchases 100 shares of (uncertificated, book-entry form only) Series B Preferred Stock (“Preferred
Shares”) of the above Corporation, a Nevada corporation from the undersigned seller and seller agrees to transfer to the
purchaser in consideration for the Preferred Shares cash in the amount of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000).


 


SECTION
2. PAYMENT OF CONSIDERATION


 


The
consideration for the Preferred Shares shall be paid to seller at Closing.


 


SECTION
3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES


 


The
undersigned represents and warrants that the undersigned is purchasing the Preferred Shares for investment and not with a view
to distribution.


 


SECTION
4. SECURITIES LAWS


 


The
undersigned understands that the Preferred Shares have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance upon an
exemption from registration. The undersigned also understands that the Preferred Shares must be held indefinitely, unless they
are later registered under the Securities Act of 1933 or unless an exemption from registration is otherwise available, and that
the Corporation has no obligation to register the Preferred Shares. The undersigned agrees that the Preferred Shares will not
be offered, sold, transferred, pledged, or otherwise disposed of without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 and applicable
state securities laws or an opinion of counsel acceptable to the Corporation that such registration is not required.


 


SECTION
5. SIGNATURES


 


This
Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together
shall constitute one and the same instrument. Telecopied or email (via PDF) signatures shall be deemed to have the same effect
as an original.


 


	Seller:	 	Purchaser:
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Brookstone
    Partners LLC
	 	 	 	 
	/s/
    Virginia Sourlis	 	By:	/s/
    Stella Lumawag
	Name:
    Virginia Sourlis	 	Name:	Stella
    Lumawag
	 	 	Title:	Managing
    Member
	 	 	 	 
	Dated:
    February 25, 2013
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | • | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | • | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                combined predecessors of the                Partnership. |
|--|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                August 11, 2008 | s/                JOHN B. WALKER                                          |
|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 | John                B. Walker                                             |
|                                 | Chief                Executive Officer of EV Management LLC,              |
|                                 | general                partner of EV Energy GP, L.P.,                     |
|                                 | general                partner of EV Energy Partners,                L.P. |

----
906 A.2d 1114

#### IN THE MATTER OF CHAK Y. LEE, A/K/A CHAK YIN LEE, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 28, 2006.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-025, recommending that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to *Rule*1:20-14,(a)(4)(E), CHAK Y. LEE, a/k/a CHAK YIN LEE, of NEW YORK, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law pursuant to *Rule*1:20-13(b) since December 28, 2005, be disbarred on the basis of his disbarment in New York;

And respondent’s discipline in New York having been based on his plea of guilty to grand larceny in the second degree, conduct that in New Jersey constitutes violations of *RPC*8.4(b)(criminal act that reflects adversely on an attorney’s honesty, trustworthiness and fitness as a lawyer), *RPC*8.4(c)(conduet involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and the principles of *In re Wilson,*81 *N.J.*451, 409 A.2d 1153 (1979)(knowing misappropriation of client trust funds requires permanent disbarment);

And CHAK Y. LEE, a/k/a CHAK YIN LEE, having failed to appear on the Order to Show Cause issued in this matter;

And good cause appearing;

*280It is ORDERED that CHAK Y. LEE, a/k/a CHAK YIN LEE, be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys;

ORDERED that CHAK Y. LEE, a/k/a CHAK YIN LEE, be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.