alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  CERTIFICATION  I, Harley B. Kaplan, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RathGibson, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation;  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.   Date:  December 14, 2006/s/ Harley B. KaplanHarley B. KaplanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Partners 16 1996 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000812187
<NAME> ANGELES PARTNERS 16
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             529
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       23
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          11,747
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,303
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         13,628
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,629)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,745
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,530
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,029
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,194
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (499)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (499)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (499)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (35.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SXC Health Solutions Corp.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: May 7, 2010By:

/s/
Jeffrey ParkJeffrey ParkChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
of ZipGlobal Holdings, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael C. Lee, Principal Executive Officer and the
Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and




(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.




Dated:August 9,
    2010
                    /s/ MICHAEL C.
      LEEMichael C.
    LeePresident, Chief Executive
      Officer and
                      Chairman
                      (Principal Executive
      Officer)
                      (Principal Financial/Accounting
      Officer)
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 13, 2015

NO. 03

- 14

- 0068 6

- CR

Ex parte Tammy Marie Ybarra

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF CALDWELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

DISMISSE D AS MOOT

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on September 26, 2014. Having

reviewed the record, the Court concludes that the appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, the

Court dismisses the appeal as moo t. Because appellant is indigent for purposes of this

proceeding, no adjudication of costs is made.
SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
 WILLIAM ZHU
  and 
 GIGAMEDIA CHINA LIMITED
 July 3rd, 2007
 1




---



##### 



SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
 Agreement
 WILLIAM ZHU Selling Shareholder
 GIGAMEDIA CHINA LIMITED Purchaser
 WHEREAS
 Company
  Purchase
Shares
  SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS
  GIGAMEDIA
 MAA
 New Articles Existing
Shareholders
 New Shareholders Agreement
 1




---



##### 



November 25, 2006 Shareholders Agreement
 Ordinary Shares
 SECTION 2 AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE
 Agreement to Purchase and Sale.
 Purchase Price. Purchase Price
 Payment of the Purchase Price.
 Installment
 SECTION 3 CLOSING; DELIVERY
 Closing Closing th Closing Date
 Delivery at the Closing
  2




---



##### 



SECTION 4 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE SELLING SHAREHOLDER
  Organization, Good Standing and Qualification.
 Valid Issuance of Purchase Shares.
 Due Authorization Ancillary Agreements
 No Conflicts
 3




---



##### 



i ii iii
 Activities since Balance Sheet Date.
 Disclosure.
 SECTION 5 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE PURCHASER
  Authorization
 No Conflicts; Consents and Approvals, etc i ii
 4




---



##### 



SECTION 6 ADDITIONAL COVENANTS
 Filing of the New Articles
 Operation in Ordinary Course.
 SECTION 7 CONDITIONS TO CLOSING BY PURCHASER
  Representations and Warranties True and Correct
 Performance of Obligations
 New Articles
 Execution of New Shareholders Agreement
 No Material Adverse Change.
 5




---



##### 



Selling Shareholder Deliverables
 Provision of Information and Materials.
 SECTION 8 TERMINATION
 Termination of Agreement
   Effect of Termination
 Survival
 SECTION 9 CONFIDENTIALITY
 Confidential Information.
 Non-Disclosure.
  6




---



##### 



SECTION 10 MISCELLANEOUS
 Binding Effect; Assignment
 Governing Law
 Dispute Resolution
 Costs and Expenses
 Notices
 7




---



##### 



(a)
    
    If to the Selling Shareholder,to:WILLIAM ZHUAddress:
    
    #53, 777 Hua Jiang Rd. Shanghai, China. 201803Facsimile:
    
    86-21-6911-8064Telephone:
    
    86-21-5911-9304Attention:
    
    Mr. William Zhu(d)
    
    If to the Purchaser, to:GIGAMEDIA CHINA LIMITEDAddress: 14th Floor,
122 Tunhwa North Road, Taipei 10595, Taiwan R.O.C.Facsimile: 886-2-8770-7576Telephone:886-2-8770-7966Attention: Ms. Jennifer Tseng, General Counsel
 x y A B
 Counterparts
 [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
 8




---



##### 



(Signature Page)
  WILLIAM ZHUBy:

/s/
William Zhu GIGAMEDIA CHINA LIMITEDBy:

/s/
Arthur WangName: Arthur WangTitle: CEO
EXHIBIT23.1**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**The Board of DirectorsKomag, Incorporated:We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8(Numbers 333-101125, 333-107261, 333-116591, and 333-134719) and on Form S-3 (Numbers333-98785 and 333-110182) of Komag, Incorporated, of our report dated February 21, 2007,with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Komag, Incorporated and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2006 and January 1, 2006 and the related consolidated statements of income,stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in thethree-year period ended December 31, 2006 and the related financial statement schedule, and ourreport dated February 21, 2007, with respect to management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in theDecember 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Komag, Incorporated.As discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method ofaccounting for stock-based compensation in 2006 upon adoption of Statement of Financial AccountingStandards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment.     KPMG LLP     Mountain View, California    February 21, 2007
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darnell Epps, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 925]

Application by the *814appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 27, 2003 *(People v Epps,*305 AD2d 697 [2003]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 15, 2000.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Miller, J.E, Schmidt, Santucci and Mastro, JJ., concur.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40380

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

LISA RENEE HENSDELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 579

Filed: June 23, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Jerome County. Hon. John K. Butler, District Judge. 

Order awarding restitution, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Lisa Renee Hensdell appeals from the district court’s restitution order, entered pursuant 

to Idaho Code § 19-5304. On appeal, Hensdell contends the district court abused its discretion 

by issuing the restitution order without finding that the year-long delay in entering the order, 

from the time of the judgment of conviction, was necessary for the processing of the request for 

restitution. See State v. Jensen, 149 Idaho 758, 763, 241 P.3d 1, 6 (Ct. App. 2010). Her claim of 

error will not be reviewed because she did not preserve it by objecting below. The fundamental 

error doctrine may not be invoked to raise a restitution issue for the first time on appeal because 

restitution proceedings are civil in nature. State v. Mosqueda, 150 Idaho 830, 834, 252 P.3d 563, 

567 (Ct. App. 2010). Accordingly, the order awarding restitution is affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ATIF MALIK,

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Criminal No. 11-130 (SRC)

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Reduction of

Sentence [docket item # 40]; and

IT APPEARING that Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35, which governs the

correction or reduction of a sentence, applies to the instant motion; and it further

APPEARING that Rule 35(b) provides that the government may move for a reduction of

sentence for substantial assistance provided by the defendant in investigating or prosecuting

another person; and it further

APPEARING that Rule 35 does not contemplate motions for the reduction of a sentence

filed by a defendant; and it further

APPEARING that Defendant has no standing under Rule 35 to obtain the relief sought; 

For the foregoing reasons, 

IT IS on this 28 day of January 2013, th

Case 2:11-cr-00130-SRC Document 42 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 79
ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion For Reduction of Sentence [docket item # 40] be

and hereby is DENIED.

 s/ Stanley R. Chesler 

Stanley R. Chesler, U.S.D.J.

Case 2:11-cr-00130-SRC Document 42 Filed 01/29/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 80
#### Paul Y. BECHTEL, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2012-7060.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 20, 2013.

Kenneth M. Carpenter, Carpenter, Chartered, of Topeka, KS, argued for claimant-appellant.

Michael Goodman, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. With him on the brief were Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Assistant Director.

NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Case 2:11-cr-00080-SDW Document 113 Filed 08/18/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 316
Case 2:11-cr-00080-SDW Document 113 Filed 08/18/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 317
Case 2:11-cr-00080-SDW Document 113 Filed 08/18/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 318
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph A. Mills, Chief Executive Officer of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC, the general partner of Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P.,
the general partner of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





Date: August 10, 2009
/s/ Joseph A. MillsJoseph A. MillsChairman and Chief Executive Officer of Eagle RockEnergy G&P, LLC, General Partner of Eagle RockEnergy GP, L.P., General Partner of Eagle RockEnergy Partners, L.P.
Exhibit
      32.2


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Splinternet Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                May 13, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                John T. GrippoJohn
                T. Grippo, Chief Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

COACH, INC., ET AL.,

Plaintiff

 V. SUMMONS ON AMENDED

COMPLAINT

HANIN TEMEH, ET AL.,

Defendant

CASE NUMBER: 2:10−CV−06269−SRC −MAS

 TO: (Name and address of Defendant):

 A lawsuit has been filed against you.

 Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) −− or 60 days if

you are the United States or a United States Agency, or an office or employee of the United States described in

Fed. R. civ. P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) −− you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a

motion under rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the

plaintiff or plaintiff`s attorney, whose name and address are:

 If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the

complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

WILLIAM T. WALSH

 CLERK

Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 11 Filed 01/21/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 159
 Norma Rodriguez

 (By) DEPUTY CLERK

ISSUED ON 2011−01−21 14:48:25.0, Clerk

USDC NJD

Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 11 Filed 01/21/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 160
RETURN OF SERVICE

 Service of the Summons and complaint was made by me (1) DATE

 NAME OF SERVER (PRINT) TITLE

 Check one box below to indicate appropriate method of service

Served personally upon the defendant. Place where served: _______________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

Left copies thereof at the defendant's dwelling house or usual place of abode with a person of suitable age and

discretion then residing therein.

Name of person with whom the summons and complaint were left:__________________________________

Returned unexecuted:_____________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

Other (specify) :_________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF SERVICE FEES

 TRAVEL SERVICES TOTAL

DECLARATION OF SERVER

 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Return of Service and Statement of Service Fees is true and correct.

Executed on ___________________ _______________________________________

Date Signature of Server

_______________________________________

Address of Server

Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 11 Filed 01/21/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 161