alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                                 CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report of Regal  Life  Concepts,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q  for the period ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report"), I, ERIC
WILDSTEIN,  President, Chief Executive Officer  and  Director  of  the  Company,
certify,  pursuant   to  18  U.S.C.  {section}  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to
{section}906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of  my
knowledge:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
<S> <C> <C>
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    (2) The information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of the Company.
<S> <C> <C>
</TABLE>



Date:  October 15, 2009


/s/ Eric Wildstein
ERIC WILDSTEIN
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 10, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony C.
      Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
              Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
                    C. Pintsopoulos
                  Principal
                    Financial Officer
                  November
                    7, 2006
**Exhibit
      23.2 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
      FIRM**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
      333-34019, 333-01019, 333-52199, 333-133389 and 333-133391 on Form S-8 of Calgon
      Carbon Corporation of our report dated April 24, 2007 ,
      (with
      respect to the consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash
      flows of Chemviron Carbon Limited, for the year ended December 31, 2005 not
      presented separately herein), which report appears in the December 31, 2007
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of Calgon Carbon Corporation.




KPMG
      LLP




Manchester,
      United Kingdom


March
      14,
      2008
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of RathGibson, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Barry C. Nuss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:  September 14, 2007/s/ Barry C. NussBarry C. NussChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1 

                              JASON INCORPORATED
                                 SUBSIDIARIES
                                     1O-K




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                               PERCENT OF
                       SUBSIDIARY                          COUNTRY                             OWNERSHIP
                       ----------                          ------                              ----------
                                                                                       
<S>                                                        <C>                                  <C>
Braden Construction Services, Inc                           U.S.                                  100%
Braden Europe, BV                                           Netherlands                           100%
Deltak Construction Services, Inc                           U.S.                                  100%
JacksonLea Canada, a subsidiary of Jason Canada             Canada                                100%
JacksonLea de Mexico                                        Mexico                                100%
Janesville de Mexico                                        Mexico                               79.2%
Jason Canada Incorporated                                   Canada                                100%
Jason Industrial Products International Corporation         Barbados                              100%
Jason Ohio Corporation                                      U.S.                                  100%
Jason, GmbH                                                 Germany                               100%
Osborn de Mexico                                            Mexico                                100%
Osborn de Venezuela                                         Venezuela                             100%
Shanghai JacksonLea Polishing Materials Co., Ltd.           P.R.C.                                 50%
Shenzhen Deltak Energy Systems Company, Ltd.                P.R.C.                                 60%
Suroflex, Gmbh                                              Germany                                51%
                                                                                       
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONBY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Pinnacle Gas Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending March 31,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Ronald T. Barnes, Senior Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and Secretary of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Date:  June 23,2009

 
|        | /s/ Ronald  T. Barnes                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Ronald T. Barnes                       |
|   | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial |
|   | Officer and Secretary                  |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incoporated in Part II, Item 7. of this Form 10KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1994
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,400
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

___________________________________

 :

AMB MOTORS, INC. : Honorable Madeline Cox Arleo

: Civil Action No. 10-6566 (SDW)

Plaintiff, : 

: 

v. : REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

 : 

UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS : 

INSURANCE, INC., et al., : 

:

Defendants. :

___________________________________ :

THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon the motion of defendant, Juana

Quinones (“Quinones”) to remand the pending action to state court (Dkt. Entry 8), and the Court

having considered the papers submitted in support of and in opposition to the remand motion and

having heard the argument of the parties, and for the reasons set forth on the record on February 28,

2011, and for good cause shown;

IT IS on this 28 day of February 2011, th

RECOMMENDED THAT Quinones’ motion to remand this action to the Superior Court

of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, (Dkt. Entry 8), be GRANTED.

The parties have fourteen (14) days from the date hereof to file objections.

s/Madeline Cox Arleo 

MADELINE COX ARLEO

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Hon. Susan D. Wigenton, U.S.D.J.

Clerk of the Court

All Parties

File

Case 2:10-cv-06566-SDW-MCA Document 14 Filed 02/28/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 163
MACK & GIL, LLC

Attorneys-At-Law

A Limited Liability Company AMrIHON!\/t

‘?

rAArv*+

IV!FW•JF\ NEW YORKOFFICE

60 PARK PLACE

___________

KELVIN A. GIL* SUITE 1104 * 20 VESEY STREET, SUITE 503 NJ AND NY BARS NEWARK, NJ 07102 NEW YORK NY 10007 + Admitted to US Supreme Court (973) 624-7800

FAX (973) 624-5005 REPLY TO NJ OFFICE

March 23, 2012

via email (i loretta.minottnjd.uscourts.gov

U.S. District Court- New Jersey

50 Walnut Street

Newark, NJ 07102

Attn.: Hon. William Walls, S.U.S.D.J.

Re.: Kelvin Jones

Docket No.: 10-cr-366

USCA# 11-3542

Please be advised that this office was appointed by your Honor to represent

Kelvin Jones, on March 14, 2012, in his appeal listed above.

On March 22, 2012, I filed an appearance with the Third Circuit and was

contacted by Mr. Jones’ attorney, Marc Fernich, who is retained and was curious as to

why I filed an appearance on behalf of his client. Apparently, he has been retained since

January 2012.

Thus, I will be withdrawing my appearance as he has retained counsel. I thank

you for considering me for this matter and hope you will keep me in mind for any future

appointments.

Please call with questions and/or concerns.

Respectfully,

Dear Judge Walls:

/Z4A’a4 t’

Mack, Esq.

ACM/jjr

/

Case 2:10-cr-00366-WHW Document 181 Filed 04/02/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1309
# table128_q14.4_state
#### Liwayway Ramos, Appellant, v Cooper Investors, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[854 NYS2d 149]

*624The plaintiff tripped and fell when she failed to notice a curb separating the walkway area in front of the defendants’ hotel and an adjacent roadway. After the plaintiff commenced the present action, the defendants moved for summary judgment, inter alia, dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendants Cooper Investors, Inc., Flushing Center, Inc., and Flushing Center, Inc., doing business as Sheraton LaGuardia East Hotel (hereinafter collectively the respondents). The Supreme Court properly granted those branches of the motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the respondents.

“A landowner has no duty to warn of conditions that are not inherently dangerous and ‘that are readily observable by the reasonable use of one’s senses’ ” *(Pirie v Krasinski,*18 AD3d 848, 849 [2005], quoting *Pedersen v Kar, Ltd.,*283 AD2d 625, 625-626 [2001]). The respondents established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by tendering evidence that the height differential between the walkway and the roadway was both open and obvious and not inherently dangerous (*see Pirie v Krasinski,*18 AD3d at 849; *Behar v All Seasons Motor Lodge,*6 AD3d 639 [2004]).

In opposition, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851 [1985]; *Behar v All Seasons Motor Lodge,*6 AD3d at 640). Fisher, J.P., Miller, McCarthy and Chambers, JJ., concur.
|  (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: May 13, 2011 | By:      /s/ Timothy P. Halter              |
|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                | Timothy P. Halter                                                                                                                     |
|                | Chief Executive Officer and                                                                                                           |
|                | Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                               |

----
#### Evelyn V. Hanlon, Appellant, v C.M. Campisi et al., Respondents.

[856 NYS2d 136]

*604The plaintiff commenced the present action, alleging that the rotator cuff tear which she sustained was proximately caused by the negligence of the defendants in causing the subject motor vehicle accident. During the course of discovery, the defendants produced an affirmed medical report prepared by Dr. David Benatar, who examined the plaintiff on behalf of the defendants and concluded that the subject motor vehicle accident was “the causative factor for [the plaintiffs] right shoulder complaints.”

At trial, the defendants’ expert radiologist, their only witness, testified that the plaintiffs rotator cuff tear was degenerative in nature. After the expert concluded her testimony, the defendants rested their case. Thereafter, at an off-the-record precharge conference, the plaintiffs attorney requested a missing witness charge with regard to Benatar, whom the defendants did not call to testify at trial. The Supreme Court denied the application.

Under the circumstances of this case, the plaintiffs request for a missing witness charge was promptly made *(see Dukes v Rotem,*191 AD2d 35 [1993]; *Trainor v Oasis Roller World,*151 AD2d 323 [1989]; *see also Follett v Thompson,*171 AD2d 777 [1991]) and therefore was not untimely. Turning to the merits, “[w]hen a doctor who examines an injured plaintiff on the defendant’s behalf does not testify at trial, an inference generally arises that the testimony of such witness would be unfavorable to the defendant. The defendant may defeat this inference by demonstrating that the testimony would be merely cumulative, the witness was unavailable or not under the defendant’s control, or the witness would address matters not in dispute” *(Brooks v Judlau Contr., Inc.,*39 AD3d 447, 449 [2007]). Here, the defendants failed to defeat the inference. Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to a new trial on the issue of damages, including the issue of serious injury.

The parties’ remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.P., Skelos, Santucci and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

In re: E-Z-DOCK, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellant

______________________

2023-1253

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Middle District of Florida in No. 2:21-cv-00450-SPC-NPM,

Judge Sheri Polster Chappell.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

August 30, 2023

Date /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Jarrett B. Perlow 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 30, 2023

Case: 23-1253 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 08/30/2023
***Exhibit 31.1******CERTIFICATIONS***     I, Gary L. Scott, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Mid-America Bancshares, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   November 9, 2006     /s/ Gary L. Scott   Gary L. Scott  Chairman and CEO  
43
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of RathGibson, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harley B. Kaplan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:  June 11, 2007/s/ Harley B. KaplanHarley B. KaplanPresident and Chief Executive Officer