alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

 
 



 
 February 19, 2013 
 Mr. Harold A. Hurwitz 
 21 Lexington 

Irvine, California 92620 
 Dear Hal: 

On behalf of the Board of Directors of Pro-Dex, Inc. (the “Company”), I am pleased to inform you of your appointment to the positions of Chief
Executive Officer and President under the terms and conditions described in this letter. You will be assuming these positions in addition to your continuing positions the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer. 

Date of Appointment 
 Your
additional responsibilities as described above will begin on February 25, 2013. 
 Compensation 

Your base rate of pay will be increased, effective as of the Date of Appointment, to $8,653.85, payable bi-weekly, for an annual base compensation of
$225,000. 
 Other 
 All
other terms of your current employment with the Company (including, without limitation, your employment letter dated August 23, 2010 (except for the base compensation stated therein) and Change of Control Agreement dated July 19, 2011) remain
unchanged. 
 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 







 If the terms of this letter are agreeable to you, please sign in the space provided below indicating your
understanding of and agreement to the provisions of this offer of employment and return it to me no later than February 22, 2013. 
 Sincerely,

 /s/ Nicholas J. Swenson 
 Nicholas
J. Swenson 
 Chairman 
 I have read
the above terms of this offer of employment and I accept and agree to them. 
  

					
	  /s/  Harold A Hurwitz
	 		 	 February 20, 2013

	Harold A. Hurwitz	 	 	 	Date
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-40054 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ERIC LAMONT ALBERTY, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-197-2

Before KING, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Eric Lamont Alberty has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 ( 1967), and United State s v . Flores , 632 F.3d 2 29 ( 5th Cir. 2011). Alberty has filed a response and moved for t he appointment of new c ounsel. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Alberty’s r esponse. We concur w ith counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents n o nonfrivolous issue for appellate r e view. The r ecord is U n i t e d S t a te s C o u rt o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D February19, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-40054 Document: 00512146817 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/19/2013No. 12-40054

insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Alberty’s c laims of ineffective a s sistance of counsel; such claims generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised b efore the district court since no opportunity existed to d evelop the record o n the merits o f the a llega t i o ns.” United States v. Cantwell , 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) ( i n t ernal
qu o t a tion marks a nd c itation omitted). Accordingly, t he motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused f rom further responsibilities herein, and t he A PPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2. Alberty’s m otion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED.

2 Case: 12-40054 Document: 00512146817 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/19/2013
ex10aa.htm




Exhibit 10-aa







AT&T INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS


COMMUNICATIONS CONCESSION PROGRAM







 







 


 


Communications Concession


 


Applies to both active and retired non-employee Directors of AT&T Inc.








	
1.  

	
Primary Residence Equipment







Each Director will receive equipment that will allow the provision of services offered by affiliates of AT&T at the Director’s primary residence as designated by the Director.  If the relevant AT&T affiliate does not service the area of the Director’s residence and it is impractical to obtain the equipment from an affiliate, then AT&T will reimburse the Director for equipment provided by another company.  Provision of equipment at the primary residence will not count against the annual communications allowance, whether the equipment is provided by the AT&T affiliate or another carrier (where equipment from the affiliate is not available).








	
2.  

	
Concession for Equipment at Other Residences and for Services







Each Director will receive communications equipment (other than at the primary residence) and services each year in an amount not to exceed the following limits:



	
·  

	
$25,000.00 for active Directors and Directors retiring after November 20, 2009;








	
·  

	
$15,000.00 for Directors retiring before November 20, 2009.













	
3.  

	
Requirements








	
·  

	
All concession services must be provided by AT&T affiliates, including AT&T Mobility and AT&T Long Distance.  The only exception is service and equipment to the primary residence where the residence is not served by an AT&T affiliate.  Services and equipment will only be provided to locations in the continental United States.








	
·  

	
The concession benefits are for the personal use of the Director and his/her immediate family sharing the same household.








	
·  

	
In order to keep you informed, the Secretary’s Office will send you a semi-annual notice indicating the usage of your concession.  If your usage exceeds the maximum benefit, you will be asked to reimburse AT&T.








	
·  

	
A Director’s surviving spouse will continue to receive benefits for fourteen months after the date of the Director’s death.








	
·  

	
This concession benefit may be amended or terminated at any time by the AT&T Board of Directors.

















Amended February 1, 2013


Effective July 2004
IL5-/S

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 06-14-00044-CR OFFENSE: 22.01

STYLE: Eric L Hill v. The State ofTexas COUNTY: Gregg

COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed TRIAL COURT: 124th District Court

DATE: 1/9/15 Publish: YES TC CASE #: 43089-B

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STYLE: Eric L. Hill v. The State of Texas CCA #: \b!T~/Sr

PRO SE Petition CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

fie,foSec/ JUDGE:

DATE: ^Tof/>€, 2 V. "ZO/i^ - • -yJUDGE: -/°C

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Arbutus  Resources,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Karen
Law,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The  information  contained in the
Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
result of operations of the Company.
IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this  certification as of the
7th day of June, 2007.

/s/  Karen Law
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLNM920000 L13100000 FI0000; NMNM-119264]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease.

# SUMMARY:

Under the Class II provisions of Title IV, Public Law 97-451, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease NMNM 119264 from the lessee, J Bar Cane Inc., for lands in Chaves County, New Mexico. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lourdes B. Ortiz, Bureau of Land Management, New Mexico State Office, P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502 or at (505) 438-7586.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    No valid lease has been issued that affects the lands. The lessee agrees to new lease terms for rentals and royalties of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year, and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee paid the required $500.00 administrative fee for the reinstatement of the lease and $166.00 cost for publishing this Notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    . The lessee met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). We are proposing to reinstate lease NMNM 119264, effective the date of termination, December 1, 2008, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.                

Lourdes B. Ortiz,

Land Law Examiner, Fluids Adjudication Team.

[FR Doc. E9-16418 Filed 7-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Annual Report of Green Oaks  Concepts,  Ltd. on
Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2003,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Daniel
L.  Hodges,  President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended February 28,
2007 of Kayne Anderson Energy Development Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Kevin S. McCarthy

Kevin S. McCarthyChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Case 2:11-cv-00630-DMC -JAD Document 8 Filed 03/31/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 30
Case 2:11-cv-00630-DMC -JAD Document 8 Filed 03/31/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 31
NY/698946V1

SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP

125 Broad Street, 39th Floor

New York, New York 10004-2400

Telephone: (212) 422-0202

Facsimile: (212) 422-0925

Attorneys for Defendant

Synthes USA SALES, LLC i/s/h/a Synthes, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT COURT OF NEW JERSEY

----------------------------------------------------------------x

SUSAN JACOBSON and MICHAEL 

KALAROFF, her husband,

Plaintiffs,

-againstSYNTHES, INC., JAMES F. COZZARELLI, 

M.D., JOHN DOES, M.D. 1-15, JOHN DOES 1-

15 and ABC CORPS. 1-15 (fictitious names),

Defendant.

Civil Action No.:

11-cv-01160(AET) (DEA)

ORDER

----------------------------------------------------------------x

THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court upon the application of Sedgwick, Detert, 

Moran & Arnold, LLP, attorneys for defendant Synthes USA SALES, LLC i/s/h/a Synthes, Inc.

(“Synthes”), in this action, and the Court having considered the papers, and for good cause shown;

IT IS on this _______ day of ____________________, 2011,

ORDERED THAT:

David M. Covey, Esq., a partner of the law firm Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP, and Soo 

Y. Kim, Esq, an associate of the law firm Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP, located at 125 Broad 

Street, 39th floor, New York, New York, 10004-2400, are permitted to appear pro hac vice in this matter as 

counsel for defendant Synthes USA SALES, LLC i/s/h/a Synthes, Inc. (“Synthes”) pursuant to Local Rule 

101.1(c); 

Case 3:11-cv-01160-AET -DEA Document 7 Filed 04/29/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 72
NY/698946V12

David M. Covey, Esq. and Soo Y. Kim, Esq. shall pay the annual fee to the New Jersey Lawyers’ 

Fund for Client Protection as provided by New Jersey Court Rule 1:28-2(a);

David M. Covey, Esq., and Soo Y. Kim, Esq., shall pay the U.S.D.C. clerk the $150 fee required by 

Local Rule 101.1(c); and

David M. Covey, Esq., and Soo Y. Kim, Esq. shall be bound by the Local Civil Rules of the United 

States District Court for the District of New Jersey.

____________________________________

Case 3:11-cv-01160-AET -DEA Document 7 Filed 04/29/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 73
NY/698946V1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing proposed ORDER was served 

electronically via the Court’s electronic filing system on April 29, 2011, upon all counsel of record.

_/s/________________________________

Jeffrey Dillon

Case 3:11-cv-01160-AET -DEA Document 7 Filed 04/29/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 74
#### Hranush KYOLYAN; et al., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-70276.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 12, 2012.

Submitted Dec. 5, 2012.

Filed Dec. 5, 2012.

Marina Kab, Esquire, Law Offices of Marina Kab, Encino, CA, for Petitioners.

Douglas E. Ginsburg, Esquire, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, CAC-Distriet Counsel, Esquire Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: WARDLAW and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and SIMON, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Michael H. Simon, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.

ORDER **

Respondent’s unopposed motion to remand is granted. Petitioners’ removal is stayed pending the Board, of Immigration Appeals’ decision in this matter.

The parties shall bear their own attorney’s fees, costs, and expenses.

REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
##### 



Exhibit 32
 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1)
    
    To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Jackie L. ReedJackie L. ReedPresident and CEO  /s/ Teresa L. MartinTeresa L. MartinChief Financial Officer
Program Update: 

Bureau of Justice Statistics

Overview of the National Crime Victimization 

Survey Redesign Process

20 January 2010

Presented by:

Michael Sinclair, Acting Director, 

Michael Rand, Chief, Victimization Statistics Unit

Bureau of Justice Statistics
2

National Crime Victimization Survey Overview

 Measures national incidence of violent and property crimes 

and describes characteristics and consequences of 

victimization

 Rotating Panel Survey: 

 Six month reporting cycle: 41,000 households; 73,000 individuals

 Sample households participate for seven periods/waves

 Interviews all household members age 12 and older

 In-Person and phone interviewing via CAPI 

 Stratified, multistage cluster design

 High response rate (about 90 percent)

 Ongoing since 1972

 Redesigned in 1992
3

Redesign Motivations

 Reasons for Redesign:

 Survey not sustainable at historical funding levels

 National Research Council recommendations

 Requests for subnational data

 Recent new funding

 Objectives of Redesign:

 Operational and statistical efficiency

 Reduce costs, streamline operations

 Increase survey precision

 Create ability to measure incidence at sub-national level

 Monitor and improve data quality

 Improve flexibility to address emerging crimes

 Create data linkages for design and reporting
Challenges Faced: Survey Constraints

4

Inherent Issues Potential Solutions

Sensitivity of Content - New methods of interviewing

- New sampling methods

Low Incidence Rate - New sampling methods

- Piggyback on other surveys

- Small area estimation

Accuracy - Quality improvement studies

Cost - Build congressional and state support

- Explore lower cost enumeration options
5

Challenges Faced: Process Constraints

 Process Constraints:

 Balancing competing objectives

 Level of geography: city, state, or national level? 

 How often: Yearly estimates or multiyear averages?

 What is measured?

 Best practices vary by objective

 Depth (understanding victimization) 

 Count (type, level and frequency).

 Law enforcement sensitivity to production of city 

level estimates beyond UCR program. 
6

Redesign Research 

 Research underway in six major areas:

 Local area estimation (synthetic estimation)

 Interview mode

 Sample design

 Survey reference period

 Non-response bias

 Crime screener analysis
7

Current Status

 2010

 Continue panel meetings

 Conduct sample studies

 Collect new para-data

 Design redesign research/field tests and prepare solicitations/IAAs

 Develop on-going data quality program

 2011-2012

 Field testing of new methods

 Synthesis of findings

 2013-2014

 Finalize design and begin implementation of new program
Agency, Survey, and Redesign Budget

8

Budget 

Component

FY 2009 

Enacted 

Amount

President’s 

FY 2010 

Request

FY 2010 

House Mark

(HR 2847)

FY 2010

Senate Mark

(HR 2847)

Criminal

Justice 

Statistics 

Program

$19.0 M $19.0 M $19.0 M $5.0 M

NCVS $26.0 M $26.0 M $26.0 M $20.0 M

NCVS 

Redesign

$15.0 M $15.0 M $15.0 M

Subtotal $45.0 M $60.0 M $60.0 M $40.0 M