alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Tim Flanagan, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of IndieMV Media Group, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IndieMV Media Group, Inc.



|Dated: November 19, 2008 |  |                                                               
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  |                                                               
|                         |  |                                                               
|                         |  | /s/ Tim Flanagan                                              
|                         |  | Tim Flanagan                                                  
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer                                       
|                         |  | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|                         |  | IndieMV Media Group, Inc.                                     





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to IndieMV Media Group, Inc. and will be retained by IndieMV Media Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1318 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit 

the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer Continental Shelf off the 

coast of California, Oregon, and Washington. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 2, 2019 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Ms. HARRIS, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. MERKLEY, Ms. 

CANTWELL, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. SANDERS, 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. MARKEY, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, and Mr. PETERS) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit the conduct of offshore drilling on the 

outer Continental Shelf off the coast of California, Oregon, and Washington. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘West Coast Ocean Pro5 tection Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1318 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING ON THE 

2 OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF OFF THE COAST 

3 OF CALIFORNIA, OREGON, AND WASHINGTON. 

4 Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

5 (43 U.S.C. 1337) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(q) PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN

8 CERTAIN AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.— 

9 Notwithstanding any other provision of this section or any 

10 other law, the Secretary of the Interior shall not issue a 

11 lease for the exploration, development, or production of 

12 oil or natural gas in any area of the outer Continental 

13 Shelf off the coast of the State of California, Oregon, or 

14 Washington.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Felice J. Muraca, Appellant, v Mark Meyerowitz et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[853 NYS2d 636]

“An essential element of criminal contempt is willful disobedience” *(Dalessio v Kressler,*6 AD3d 57, 66 [2004]). Indeed, *698“[t]o be found guilty of criminal contempt, the contemnor usually must be shown to have violated the order [or judgment] with a higher degree of willfulness than is required in a civil contempt proceeding” *(Matter of Department of Envtl. Protection of City of N.Y. v Department of Envtl. Conservation of State of N.Y.,*70 NY2d 233, 240 [1987]). Moreover, unlike a civil contempt proceeding, proof of guilt must be established beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal contempt proceeding *(see County of Rockland v Civil Serv. Empls. Assn.,*62 NY2d 11, 16 [1984]; *N.A. Dev. Co. v Jones,*99 AD2d 238 [1984]).

Here, we agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff failed to make the prima facie showing of willful disregard of a court order by the defendants Mark Meyerowitz and Karen Meyerowitz necessary to support a finding of criminal contempt. While those defendants may have misinterpreted a certain provision of the judgment, the record nevertheless supports the conclusion that they made reasonable attempts to comply with that provision soon after the entry of the judgment. Under such circumstances, a finding of criminal contempt was not warranted *(cf. Ferraro v Ferraro,*272 AD2d 510 [2000]). Skelos, J.P., Lifson, Santucci and Balkin, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Baoshinn Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, I, Benny Kan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  November 12, 2009 BAOSHINN CORPORATION By:  /s/ Benny Kan Benny Kan  {A0055941.DOC}    Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Baoshinn Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, I, Sean Webster, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  November 12, 2009 BAOSHINN CORPORATION By:  /s/ Sean Webster Sean Webster    {A0055941.DOC}
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Coronado Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Alejandro Quesada, Chief Executive and Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this
certification as of the 9th day of February, 2009.  Alejandro Quesada Chief Executive and Financial Officer
Case 2:11-cv-00902-FSH -PS   Document 19-4    Filed 04/04/11   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 331

Case 2:11-cv-00902-FSH -PS   Document 19-4    Filed 04/04/11   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 332
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 

 v. 

KELVIN L. JONES 

 a/k/a “Mike Smith” 

: 

: 

: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

: 

: Crim. No. 10-366 (WHW) 

: 

: 

: 

Walls, Senior District Judge 

Pursuant to the inherent authority of the Court to impose sanctions to enforce compliance 

with its lawful mandates and ensure the orderly and expeditious resolution of cases, Chambers v. 

NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 43–44 (1991), 

It is, on this 21st day of November, 2011, 

ORDERED that Michael A. Orozco, counsel for Kelvin L. Jones, shall appear before this 

Court at 9:30 a.m. on December 7, 2011 to show cause why the Court should not impose a 

monetary sanction of $200 on Mr. Orozco for his failure to appear at 12:15 p.m. on November 9, 

2011, as directed by this Court, and for Mr. Orozco’s failure to timely notify the Court of any 

time conflict with another proceeding prior to the time at which he was directed to appear, 

conduct that unduly delayed the resolution of the matter before the Court; and 

ORDERED that Michael A. Orozco shall file any written submissions with the Court 

related to this Order to Show Cause no later than December 2, 2011. 

/s/ William H. Walls 

United States Senior District Judge

Case 2:10-cr-00366-WHW Document 157 Filed 11/22/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1049
---

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned, Charlie Lee, Principal Financial Officer of
Pure Pharmaceuticals Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that, to his knowledge:

| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for
      the period ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                           

Dated: May 20, 2008

/s/ Charlie
Lee
Charlie Lee Principal Financial Officer

_____________________________

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Clicksoftware Technologies
Ltd. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Shmuel Arvatz, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



/s/ Shmuel Arvatz
Name:   Shmuel Arvatz
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Date:   April 24, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

FIRESTONE FINANCIAL CORP.,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

609 SEASIDE AMUSEMENTS, INC.,

et al.,

 Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-889 (MLC)

 O P I N I O N

THE PLAINTIFF, Firestone Financial Corp. (“Firestone”),

earlier moved pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55 and 

54(b) for final entry of judgment by default against defendants 

Brian Petaccio, 609 Seaside Amusements, Inc., and United Textile 

Fabricators, LLC (collectively, the “Defaulting Defendants”) on the 

issue of damages. (Dkt. entry no. 33, Mot. for Default Judgment.) 

The Court, through an April 13, 2012 Order, denied that motion 

without prejudice. (Dkt. entry no. 37, 4-13-12 Order.) The 

rationale underlying the Court’s order is detailed in the 4-13-12 

Order and will not be repeated here. (See id. at 1-3.) But the 

Court instructed Firestone in the 4-13-12 Order that Firestone 

could again move for a final entry of judgment by default against 

the Defaulting Defendants after having the remaining defendant, 

Theresa Petaccio (“Petaccio”), dismissed from this action. (Id.

at 4.)

Case 3:11-cv-00889-MLC-LHG Document 42 Filed 05/09/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 839
2

FIRESTONE now moves to dismiss the Complaint insofar as it is 

asserted against Petaccio. (Dkt. entry no. 40, Mot. to Dismiss.) 

The Court notes that Petaccio has not filed opposition papers, 

though the deadline for filing such opposition passed on May 7, 

2012. The Court also notes that Petaccio’s legal counsel 

represented to the Magistrate Judge’s chambers that Petaccio would 

not oppose the motion.

THE COURT, for good cause appearing, will thus enter an 

appropriate Order.

 s/ Mary L. Cooper .

MARY L. COOPER

United States District Judge

Date: May 9, 2012

Case 3:11-cv-00889-MLC-LHG Document 42 Filed 05/09/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 840
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1301 

To prohibit the use of the poisons sodium fluoroacetate (known as ‘‘Compound 

1080’’) and sodium cyanide for predator control. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 2, 2019 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself and Mr. BOOKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of the poisons sodium fluoroacetate 

(known as ‘‘Compound 1080’’) and sodium cyanide for 

predator control. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chemical Poisons Re5 duction Act of 2019’’ or ‘‘Canyon’s Law’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSE. 

7 The purpose of this Act is to restrict the use of the 

8 poisons sodium fluoroacetate (known as ‘‘Compound 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1301 IS

1 1080’’) and sodium cyanide to kill predatory animals due 

2 to the risks posed by those poisons to— 

3 (1) public safety; 

4 (2) national security; 

5 (3) the environment; and 

6 (4) persons and other animals that come into 

7 accidental contact with those poisons. 

8 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON USE OF CERTAIN POISONS FOR 

9 PREDATOR CONTROL. 

10 (a) DEFINITION OF PREDATOR CONTROL DEVICE.— 

11 In this section, the term ‘‘predator control device’’ 

12 means— 

13 (1) a dispenser designed to propel sodium 

14 fluoroacetate or sodium cyanide when activated by 

15 an animal; 

16 (2) a livestock protection collar designed to re17 lease sodium fluoroacetate or sodium cyanide when 

18 punctured by an animal; 

19 (3) a gas cartridge or other pyrotechnic device 

20 designed to emit sodium fluoroacetate or sodium cy21 anide fumes when activated by an animal; and 

22 (4) any other means of dispensing sodium 

23 fluoroacetate or sodium cyanide, including in the 

24 form of capsules, for wildlife management or other 

25 animal control purposes. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 1301 IS

1 (b) PROHIBITION.—It shall be unlawful to use so2 dium fluoroacetate (known as ‘‘Compound 1080’’) or so3 dium cyanide in a predator control device. 

4 (c) PENALTY.—Any person that violates subsection 

5 (b) shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, im6 prisoned for not more than 2 years, or both. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### Tiberio Vilorio, Plaintiff, v Suffolk Y Jewish Community Center, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Eastern Horizon Landscaping, Inc., Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 101]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Eastern Horizon Landscaping, Inc., appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), dated August 30, 2005, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cross claim for common-law indemnification against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the contention of the defendant Eastern Horizon Landscaping, Inc. (hereinafter Eastern), the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cross claim for common-law indemnification against it. Substantial factual issues exist regarding whether Eastern improperly performed its contractual snow plowing duties by piling snow up against a walkway which was adjacent to the parking lot it was plowing, thereby creating an obstacle to pedestrian traffic and facilitating the formation of ice at that location *(see generally Knee v Trump Vil. Constr. Corp.,*15 AD3d 545 [2005]; *Reznicki v Strathallan Hotel, Inc.,*
      *69712 AD3d 156 [2004]; *Karalic v City of New York,*307 AD2d 254 [2003]). “[S]ince there are questions of fact as to whether the accident resulted from [Eastern’s] alleged failure to fulfill its obligations pursuant to the terms of the snow removal contract” *(Richter v Hunter’s Run Homeowners Assn., Inc.,*14 AD3d 601, 602 [2005]; *see Mitchell v Fiorini Landscape,*284 AD2d 313, 314 [2001]), the cross claim for common-law indemnification cannot be resolved as a matter of law *[see e.g. Peycke v Newport Media Acquisition II, Inc.,*17 AD3d 338 [2005]; *Franklin v Omni Sagamore Hotel,*5 AD3d 348 [2004]; *Baratta v Home Depot USA,*303 AD2d 434 [2003]; *Nizam v Friol,*294 AD2d 901 [2002]; *Cochrane v Warwick Assoc.,*282 AD2d 567 [2001]; *Phillips v Young Men’s Christian Assn.,*215 AD2d 825 [1995]). Adams, J.E, Goldstein, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.
907 A.2d 1009

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. CHARLES FULLER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

September 8, 2006.

ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, and the matter is remanded to the Appellate Division to consider whether auto exception applies under *State v. Eckel,*185 *N.J.*523, 888 A.2d 1266 (2006).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6684]

# ACTION:

Notice of meetings; postponement.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of State (DOS) and the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) are hereby providing notice that the fifth meeting of the United States-Chile Environment Affairs Council (the “Council”) and the third meeting of the Joint Commission for Environmental Cooperation (the “Commission”), which were previously scheduled for July 1, 2009, have been postponed. The meetings have not yet been rescheduled. DOS and USTR will publish notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         of the date, time and agenda for the rescheduled meetings, and will invite interested agencies, organizations, and members of the public to submit written comments or suggestions regarding agenda items when arrangements for the meetings are complete. The Department of State and USTR originally provided notice of the meetings on June 11, 2009, at 74 FR 27858 (2009).                    

Dated: June 24, 2009.

Robert A. Sorenson,

Acting Director, Office of Environmental Policy, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-15334 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-09-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 41212 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v. FRANCISCO ORTIZ-RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15 -CR- 198 -2

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Francisco Ortiz -Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ortiz-Rodriguez ha s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 6, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-41212 Document: 00513898023 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/06/2017No. 16

- 41212

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-41212 Document: 00513898023 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/06/2017