alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MARCH 31, 2003
                   CERTIFICATION BY JAMES VOLOSHIN PURSUANT TO
            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Director  and Chief Financial Officer of Medplus Corporation,
(the  "Company"),  hereby  certify,  to  the best of my knowledge, that the Form
10-KSB/A  of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2003 (the "Annual Report")
accompanying  this  certification  fully  complies  with the requirements of the
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d))  and  that  the  information  contained  in  the  Periodic Report fairly
presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of
operations  of  the  Company. The foregoing certification is incorporated solely
for  purposes  of  complying  with  the  provisions  of  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to be used for any other purpose.

/s/ James Voloshin
James Voloshin
Director Chief Financial Officer
Dated: October 15, 2003



<PAGE>
NO. ___________________

HENRY ANDRE WINZER § IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

§

v. § STATE OF TEXAS

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS § AUSTIN, TEXAS

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

NOW COMES, the Appellant, HENRY ANDRE WINZER, and moves for an extension of

time to file the Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review in this case, and in support thereof

would show the following:

I.

a. This case is pending below in the 422nd District Court of Kaufman County, Texas

under Cause No. 14-00334-422-F, styled State of Texas v. Henry Andre Winzer. It is

also pending in the Dallas Court of Appeals under case number 05-14-01079-CR.

b. Appellant was convicted of Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon and

sentenced to 5 years imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The

judgment date was July 30, 2014. On August 18, 2015, the Court of Appeals affirmed

the conviction.

c. The deadline for filing the Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review was

September 17, 2015.

d. Appellant requests an extension until October 17, 2015, to file the Petition for

Discretionary Review.

e. The reason for this request is that during the last few weeks counsel has been

working on the following:

1. Filing of Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Robert Blake Adams v. William

Stephens, Director, TDCJ-ID, with the United States Court of Appeals.

Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review - Page 1

PD-1174-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 9/10/2015 11:40:15 AM

Accepted 9/14/2015 12:23:13 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
2. Petition for Discretionary Review in Todd Allen Reich v. State of Texas, No.

PD-1081-15, in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant respectfully prays that this Motion 

be granted.

Respectfully submitted,

 /s/ Gary A. Udashen 

GARY A. UDASHEN

Texas State Bar No. 20369590

SORRELS, UDASHEN & ANTON

2311 Cedar Springs Road

Suite 250

Dallas, Texas 75201

214-468-8100

214-468-8104 fax

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion for 

Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Petition for DiscretionaryReviewwas electronicallydelivered

to the Kaufman County District Attorney’s Office, 100 W. Mulberry, Kaufman, Texas 75142, and

to the State Prosecuting Attorney, P. O. Box 12405, Austin, Texas 78711, on this the 10th day of

September, 2015.

/s/ Gary A. Udashen 

GARY A. UDASHEN

Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review - Page 2
One Newark Center, 19th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Tel: 973.690.5400 Fax: 973.466.2761 

www.rwmlegal.com

January 24, 2018

VIA ECF

The Honorable Roberto A. Rivera-Soto

Ballard Spahr LLP

210 Lake Drive East, Suite 200

Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08002

Re: Kimberlee Williams, et al. v. BASF Catalysts LLC, et al.

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01754 (JLL) (JAD)

Dear Justice Rivera-Soto:

On behalf of defendant BASF Catalysts LLC, I write in response to plaintiffs’ 

17-page motion to compel [ECF No. 414]. Plaintiffs provided no notice to 

defendants that they intended to file this motion, in violation of Local Civil Rule 

37.1’s meet and confer requirement. Plaintiffs failed to raise this with BASF even 

though BASF was on the phone with plaintiffs’ counsel last night on other discovery 

issues. 

Based on our initial review of plaintiffs’ submission, it is not apparent that it 

is supported by any good-faith legal basis. Most of plaintiffs’ brief requests 

agreements between co-defendants, even though this Court already denied this same 

request just months ago. See 10/27/17 Order [ECF No. 365]. Plaintiffs did not seek 

Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 415 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 16321
The Honorable Roberto A. Rivera-Soto

January 24, 2018

Page 2

reconsideration of that order and did not appeal it, and nothing has changed since 

then. The remainder of plaintiffs’ submission makes other arguments that are 

frivolous on their face, such as that defendants through agreements waived their 

privilege. We also note that this lengthy motion comes after plaintiffs sought—and 

received—additional time for both their class certification brief and for complying 

with their discovery obligations as to Rothenberg. 

All counsel have substantial obligations in this litigation, and there are many 

legitimate issues that require this Court’s attention. This is not one of them. Under 

all the circumstances, we believe the Court can simply deny plaintiffs’ motion 

outright, including because of their failure to meet and confer. BASF asks that it be 

permitted to respond on February 2, 2018, or as directed by the Court. BASF will 

ask that, at the conclusion of this motion, the Court consider awarding fees for this 

Motion and that the Court’s time devoted to this meritless submission be allocated 

entirely to the plaintiffs.

Respectfully Submitted, 

s/ Justin T. Quinn

 Justin T. Quinn

Counsel for BASF Catalysts LLC

cc: All counsel of record (via ECF)

Case 2:11-cv-01754-BRM-AME Document 415 Filed 01/24/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 16322
Exhibit 10.44 - WTroupe Termination Letter Agreement








Exhibit 10.44






February 7, 2013
Warren L. Troupe


		
	Re:
	Termination of Letter Agreement


Dear Warren:
This letter will confirm our agreement to terminate the Letter Agreement dated February 18, 2008 between UDR, Inc. (the “Company”) and you, effective as of December 31, 2012.
Sincerely,
	
					
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	/s/Thomas W. Toomey
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Thomas W. Toomey
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Agreed and acknowledged:
	 
	 
	 
	 

	

	 
	 
	 
	 

	/s/Warren L. Troupe
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Warren L. Troupe
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JOSE BEZAREZ

,

Defendant Below

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below

Appellee. §

§ No. 277, 2014

§

§

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware,

§ in and for New Castle County

§ Cr. ID 0702002298

§

§

Submitted: October 9, 2014

Decided: December 1, 2014

Before STRINE

, Chief Justice, RIDGELY

, and VALIHURA

, Justices

O R D E R

This 1 st day of December 2014

, after careful consideration of appellant’s

opening brief , the State’s motion to affirm, and the record, we find it manifest that the

Superior Court’s judgment should be affirmed on the basis of it s well

- reasoned

decision dated May 12, 2014 . The Superior Court did not err in concluding t hat

appellant’s second motion for postconviction relief following his no contest plea was

procedurally barred and that appellant had failed to overcome the procedural hurdles.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFFIRM ED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: GetLinks Inc. v. Kalibrr Inc.

Appellate case number: 01-21-00728-CV

Trial court case number: 2021-26067

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

On July 21, 2022, appellants, Angkor Capital Limited, GetLinks Inc., and Keenan Kwok,

filed an unopposed motion asking this Court to abate the appeal, pending the outcome of the trial 

court’s July 20, 2022 dismissal order, dismissing the claims of appellee, Kalibrr Inc. We deny the 

motion to abate. Appellants may seek extensions of time to file their brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

10.5(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Sherry Radack________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___August 4, 2022____
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Paul Stanford, Respondent, v Lewis County Opportunities, Appellant, and Special Disability Fund, Respondent. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

[822 NYS2d 341]

*1099Cardona, EJ.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed February 10, 2005, which determined that Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a is inapplicable.

Claimant suffered a compensable back injury in March 1993 while in the course of his employment with Lewis County Opportunities. In June 1995, after claimant underwent back surgery, Lewis County Opportunities filed a notice of its right to reimbursement of compensation payments which indicated that claimant had concurrent employment with the Watertown Daily Times. The case was subsequently closed in 1996 without the issue of concurrent employment being determined. Thereafter, in December 2003, claimant’s surgeon requested authorization to perform another surgical procedure and a hearing regarding that issue was conducted in October 2004. In the course of that proceeding, claimant’s alleged concurrent employment at the time of his injury was addressed, as well as the potential liability of the Special Funds Conservation Committee under Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a. Notably, that statutory provision imposes liability on the Special Funds in matters where a workers’ compensation case has been fully closed and certain time periods have elapsed.* Although the Special Funds was initially found liable herein, a Workers’ Compensation Board panel ultimately found that claimant’s case was not “truly closed” in 1996 and, therefore, liability did not shift to the Special Funds. Lewis County Opportunities, through its workers’ compensation carrier, now appeals.

We find that there is substantial evidence in the record supporting the Board’s factual finding that the subject case was not fully closed in 1996 *(see Matter of Jones v HSBC,*304 AD2d 864, 866 [2003]). Significantly, a case is not “truly closed” if further proceedings are contemplated at the time of the closing *(Matter of Jones v HSBC, supra*at 866; *see Matter of Knapp v Empire Aluminum Indus.,*256 AD2d 811 [1998]; *Matter of McGarry v Capatano & Grow Constr. Co.,*58 AD2d 372, 374 [1977], *affd*44 NY2d 946 [1978]). Here, the record indicates that the issue of concurrent employment remained unresolved when the case *1100was closed in 1996 and, therefore, we find no basis to disturb the Board’s decision that Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a is inapplicable (see *Matter of Stevens v MMR Corp.,*13 AD3d 1002, 1003 [2004]).

Spain, Mugglin, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

*

 Pursuant to statute, the Special Funds is liable for any payments if a closed case is reopened more than seven years following the injury and three years following the last payment of compensation (see Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a [1]).
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1335 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1335

       To eliminate the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 6, 2019

Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Lee, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Sasse, Mr. Rounds, Mrs. 
Blackburn, and Mr. Paul) introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To eliminate the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Repeal CFPB Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL.

    The Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5481 et 
seq.) is repealed, and the provisions of law amended or repealed by 
that Act are restored or revived as if the Act had not been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:11-mj-07026-ES Document 12 Filed 03/18/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 19
Case 2:11-mj-07026-ES Document 12 Filed 03/18/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 20
Case 2:11-mj-07026-ES Document 12 Filed 03/18/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 21
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS 

 

 DATE OF PROCEEDINGS: 11/15/2012

 CRIMINAL NO.: 11-161(JAP)-01

OFFICE: TRENTON

JUDGE JOEL A. PISANO

COURT REPORTER: JOANNE CARUSO

 

TITLE OF CASE:

United States of America 

VS.

Christopher Rad - Defendant present.

APPEARANCE: 

Erez Lieberman, Assistant United States Attorney

Andrew Pak, Assistant United States Attorney

Patrick Darragh, Paralegal for Government

Laurie Allen, Special Agent

Suzanne Beck, Special Agent

Abigail Weidner, Special Agent

Francis Williams Montenegro, Esquire for Defendant

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: 

Trial with jury continued.

Hearing on defendant’s motion for reconsideration [#43] .

Ordered motion Denied.

Jury present.

Ordered jury sworn.

Judge Pisano gives brief summary of legal instructions to the jury.

Ordered lunch provided to jury and alternates (14) at the expense of the Court (Sianna’s Catering Service).

Andrew Pak - Opened for Government

Francis W. Montenegro - Opened for Defendant

James Bragg - Sworn for Government

Court recess: 12:45 p.m. to 1:15 p.m.

Jury present.

James Bragg - Resumed for Government

Various exhibits admitted into evidence.

Ordered jury excused.

Trial with jury adjourned until Monday, November 19, 2012 at 9:30 a.m.

Time commenced 9:15 a.m. to 3:15 p.m.

S/Dana Sledge, Courtroom Deputy

Case 3:11-cr-00161-JAP Document 44 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 318
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14
PROMULGATED UNDER
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [Intentionally omitted.](c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 /s/ J. Roger Moody, Jr.J. Roger Moody, Jr.Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
1 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION CLOSED 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

__________________________________________

 

JAMES WRIGHT, 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 v. 

 

THE HARTFORD BENEFIT MANAGEMENT 

SERVICES, et al., 

 

Defendants. 

__________________________________________

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Hon. Faith S. Hochberg, U.S.D.J. 

Civil Case No. 11-602 (FSH) (MAH)

ORDER

Date: May 11, 2012 

 

HOCHBERG, District Judge; 

 

This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Cross-Motions for Summary 

Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Civil Rule 56.1 and Defendants’ motion to 

strike portions of the affidavit filed by Plaintiff’s counsel in support of Plaintiff’s motion for 

summary judgment; and 

for the reasons set forth in this Court’s Opinion of May 11, 2012; 

IT IS on this 11th day of May, 2012, 

ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Docket # 24) is 

GRANTED; and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Docket # 

23) is DENIED; and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to strike (Docket # 47) is 

DENIED; and 

 

Case 2:11-cv-00602-FSH-MAH Document 74 Filed 05/11/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 2042
2 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is CLOSED. 

/s/ Faith S. Hochberg__________ 

Hon. Faith S. Hochberg, U.S.D.J.

Case 2:11-cv-00602-FSH-MAH Document 74 Filed 05/11/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2043
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-40054

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ERIC LAMONT ALBERTY,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CR-197-2

Before KING, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Eric Lamont Alberty has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Alberty has filed a response and moved for the appointment of new counsel. We

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

therein, as well as Alberty’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that

the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. The record is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 19, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-40054 Document: 00512146817 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/19/2013
No. 12-40054

insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Alberty’s claims of

ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims generally “cannot be resolved on

direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no

opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.”

United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal

quotation marks and citation omitted). Accordingly, the motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Alberty’s motion for

appointment of new counsel is DENIED.

2

 Case: 12-40054 Document: 00512146817 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/19/2013
Exhibit
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Snowdon
Resources Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert
M. Baker, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






Dated
this 23rd day of March, 2009.




“R.M.
Baker”___________________________


Robert M. Baker


Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Shermen WSC Acquisition Corp.(the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/Afor the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|                                 |                            |                               |
|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                                 | /s/ John E.  Toffolon, Jr. |
|                                 |   Name:               | John E.  Toffolon, Jr.        |
|                                 |   Title:              | Chief Financial Officer  and       |
|                                 |                            | Director (Principal  Financial and |
|                                 |                            | Accounting Officer)                |
|                                 |                            |                               |
| Dated:  September 2,  2008 |                            |                               |

 

----