alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;      and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        | MEDPRO      SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                        |                              |   |
| Dated:      August 13, 2009 | By:                               | /s/      Marc T. Ray |   |
|                        |                              |  Marc      T. Ray |
|                        |                              |  Chief      Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael S. Gross, Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Marathon Acquisition Corp., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form
10-Q of Marathon Acquisition Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Dated this 14th day of
November, 2007.



|    |  |                                                        
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Michael S. Gross                                   
|    |  | Michael S. Gross                                       
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 10, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1877

Lower Tribunal No. 18-30789

________________

P.P.,

Appellant,

vs.

In Re: Rolando A. Perez, et al. vs. Maria Elena Perez,

Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade 

County, Beatrice Butchko, Judge.

The Law Sebastian Ohanian, LLC, and Sebastian Ohanian, for 

appellant.

Arnaldo Velez, P.A., and Arnaldo Velez, for appellee Maria Elena 

Perez.

Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Richard Heyse,
certify that:

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innophos Holdings, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided Innophos Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Innophos
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned expressly disclaims any
obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: November 14, 2007



/s/ RICHARD HEYSERichard Heyse Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as a part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT**  **FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA**  No. DA 23 -0189 IN THE MATTER OF : C.H., C.H., AND S.H. , Youths In Need Of Care . **ORDER** Upon consideration of Mother and Appellant ’s Motion To Consolidate Cases , and with good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that DA 23 -0189, DA 23 -0190, and DA 23 -0191 are hereby consolidated under DA 23 -0189 and captioned as above.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 11 2023

08/11/2023
906 A.2d 1114

#### IN THE MATTER OF MARC A. CALELLO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 27, 2006.

ORDER

TMs matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that MARC A. CALELLO of NUTLEY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months effective June 5, 2006, by Order of tMs Court filed May 10, 2006, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent provide to the Office of Attorney EtMcs quarterly reconciliations of Ms attorney trust accounts on a schedule to be set by the Office of Attorney EtMcs, until such time *279as the Office of Attorney Ethics deems it unnecessary, and until the further Order of the Court.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of California Gold Corp. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2010,as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, James D. Davidson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of September
20, 2010.





/s/ James D.
      DavidsonJames
      D. DavidsonChief Executive Officer andChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to
California Gold Corp., and will be retained by California Gold Corp., and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Jean Edriste, Appellant, v Jose A. Morales, Respondent.

[852 NYS2d 792]

The defendant made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). In opposition, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact through the submission of an affirmed magnetic resonance imaging report finding a herniated disc in her lumbar spine and the affirmed report of her examining physician, who averred that her cervical and lumbar spine ranges of motion were diminished on all planes as quantified in the report *(see Cordero v Ford Credit Titling Trust Ins. Ctr.,*39 AD3d 796, 796-797 [2007]; *Hyun Jun Kim v Collazo,*38 AD3d 842, 842-843 [2007]; *Santiago v Rodriguez,*38 AD3d 639, 640 [2007]; *Lim v Tiburzi,*36 AD3d 671, 672 [2007]; *Collado v Pineda,*31 AD3d 684, 685 [2006]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should not have granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Prudenti, P.J., Skelos, Miller, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
- 1004-1
- 1004-2
- 1004-3
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Novamerican Steel Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 23, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated: April 7, 2008 |   | /s/ *Corrado De Gasperis*                              |   |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | *Corrado De Gasperis*

*(Principal Executive Officer)* |   |
|                 |   |                                                   |   |
| Dated: April 7, 2008 |   | /s/ *Corrado De Gasperis*                              |   |
|                 |   | *Corrado De Gasperis*

*(Principal Financial Officer)* |   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
@article{1211281,
  author = {Bin Hu and Hamid Gharavi},
  title = {Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Edge Computing for Wide Area Monitoring},
  year = {2023},
  number = {4},
  month = {2023-07-07 04:07:00},
  publisher = {IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=956267},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCOMS.2023.3292050},
  language = {en},
}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0037

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DALE STEVEN MARTELL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 17, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 11 2020

06/11/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0037
-against

LEONID ZALTSBERG,

Defendant

-—-—--——*————-—---—---————x

AN APPLICATION HAVING BEEN MADE TO THIS COURT BY DEFENDANT

LEONID ZALTSBERG, for permission for him to travel internationally in Europe for a two-month

period, and Government attorney Michael C. Vasiliadis, Esq, the lead prosecutor on this ease,

having no objection to said application,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that defendant is granted immediate permission to travel

outside of the United States from November 21, 2012 to January 21, 2013, and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that prior to commencing this period ofinternational travel,

defendant shall provide his Probation Ofticer with an itinerary of his planned travel, and said

itinerary shall be subject to thapproval of the Probation Officer.

Dated: November ,5,2012Steven R. Kartagener, Esq. . CVi1iadis,Esq

Counsel for the Government — United States District Judge

Case No 1O-CR-437 (SRC)

QiUR
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-71,331]

                    Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on June 22, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers of Eos Airlines, Incorporated, Purchase, New York.                          ( print page 31983)    

The Department issued a negative determination (TA-W-65,739) applicable to the petitioning group of workers on April 14, 2009 and a negative determination regarding an application for reconsideration on June 22, 2009.

The current petition regarding the investigation has been deemed invalid. All petitioners were separated more than one year prior to the date of petition. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of June 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-15769 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 12 Filed 09/07/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 123
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 12 Filed 09/07/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 124
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert I., Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 922]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hinrichs, J.), dated June 17, 2005, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court’s determination to designate him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus, should not be disturbed *(see*Correction Law § 168-n [3]; *People v Awalt,*17 AD3d 336 [2005]; *People v Hampton,*300 AD2d 641 [2002]). Crane, J.E, Ritter, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Case 2:11-cv-01117-DMC   Document 11    Filed 01/25/12   Page 1 of 5 PageID: 65

Case 2:11-cv-01117-DMC   Document 11    Filed 01/25/12   Page 2 of 5 PageID: 66

Case 2:11-cv-01117-DMC   Document 11    Filed 01/25/12   Page 3 of 5 PageID: 67

Case 2:11-cv-01117-DMC   Document 11    Filed 01/25/12   Page 4 of 5 PageID: 68

Case 2:11-cv-01117-DMC   Document 11    Filed 01/25/12   Page 5 of 5 PageID: 69
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce A. Williamson, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                            
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ BRUCE A. WILLIAMSON                    
|                     |  |     |  | Bruce A. Williamson Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant
      to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Striker Energy Corp. (Registrant) on
      Form 10Q-SB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission filed concurrently
      herewith (the Report), I, Shawn Perger, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
      Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.








**Striker
      Energy Corp., a Nevada corporation**




Date:
      December 3, 2006    By:/s/
      Shawn Perger, President, CEO,  Treasurer,
      Principal Accounting Officer and Director
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coronado Corp. (the "Company") onForm 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Alejandro Quesada, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the5ht day of November, 2007.

***/s/ Alejandro Quesada***

Chief Executive Officer

 

----

 

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coronado Corp. (the "Company") onForm 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, ShawnPhillips, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all        material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of        the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the5th day of November, 2007.

***/s/ Shawn Phillips***

Chief Financial Officer
#### The Rose.1 Vierow and others *v.*The Rose and Her Cargo of Cotton.

*(District Court, E. D. New York.*

June 15, 1887.)

Salvage—Towing Lighter—Burning Pier—Tender.

The libelant’s tug towed the lighter R., laden with cotton, from the vicinity of the Morgan Line pier, which was on fire, to a place of safety. Claimant, admitting that the service was a salvage service, offered to pay §140, together with costs after the action had been begun. *Held,*that the offer was a liberal one, and should have been accepted; that libelant should have a decree for §140 and taxable costs up to the time of filing the answer, less the taxable costs which accrued after the answer was filed.

In Admiralty.

*Anson B. Stewart,*for libelants.

*Julian B. Shope,*for claimants.

1

Reported by Edward G. Benedict, Esq., of the New York bar.

Benedict, J.

The only question presented to me for decision in this case is in regard to the amount proper to be awarded to the owner and crew of the tug Reindeer, for salvage services rendered to a cargo of cotton laden on board the lighter Rose. The lighter was lying- in a slip in the North river, the pier on the lower side of which was the pier of the Morgan Line, which was on fire. The services consisted in towing the lighter, with her cargo of cotton, from this slip to a place remote from the fire.

The claimants have conceded that the services were salvage services, and offered to pay $140 as salvage compensation. This offer was repeated after the action was commenced, and accompanied with an offer to pay the costs of the action up to that time. By stipulation, the offer is to be regarded as a legal tender, accompanied with a payment into court at the filing of the answer.

In my opinion the offer of $140 was a liberal one, and should have been accepted. The proof will not warrant an award exceeding that sum. Let the libelant have a decree against the cargo for $140 and-the taxable costs up to the time of the filing of the answer, less the taxable costs of the claimant which have accrued since the answer was filed.