alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Regal Life Concepts, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31,  2009  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  in  the  capacities  and  on  the  dates indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

   1. The Report fully complies with the requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in  all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations of  the
      Company.


Date:  July 2, 2009


/s/ Eric Wildstein
-------------------------------------------
Eric Wildstein, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Crim. No. 11-34 (FSH)

v. : O R D E R

ERIDIO POLANCO. :

Defendant. :

This matter having come before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge filed in this matter, which was submitted as a result of this Court having

referred this cause to the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of conducting a plea proceeding under

Fed. R. Crim. P. 11; and the defendant having consented to the Magistrate Judge conducting the

guilty plea proceeding; and the Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as

the transcript of the proceedings on January 20, 2011 and there being no objection to the Report and

Recommendation timely filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b); and the Court finding the Report and

Recommendation is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law; and the Court hereby finding that

the Report and Recommendation should be approved and adopted and the defendant’s guilty plea

accepted,

IT IS ON THIS 4 day of March, 2011, th

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is

approved and adopted; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant’s guilty plea is accepted and a judgment

of guilt to Count One of the Information shall be entered. 

 s/ Faith S. Hochberg 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:11-cr-00034-FSH Document 23 Filed 03/04/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 48
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Thomas A. Tolworthy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of VS Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2006



|    |  |                                                         
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /S/ Thomas A. Tolworthy                                 
|    |  |                                                         
|    |  | Thomas A. Tolworthy Chief Executive Officer and Director
#### Timothy J. Dolan et al., Respondents, v Keith McCauley et al., Respondents, and Lily Flanagan’s, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 464]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Lily Flanagan’s appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated August 18, 2005, which denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action alleging a violation of General Obligations Law § 11-101 (1) and all cross claims based upon that cause of action insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiffs.

*583The appellant failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law with respect to the cause of action alleging a violation of General Obligations Law § 11-101 (1) and all cross claims based on that cause of action insofar as asserted against it *(see Dollar v O’Hearn,*248 AD2d 886, 887 [1998]).

That branch of the appellant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action alleging common-law negligence remains pending and undecided, and therefore the appellant’s contentions regarding that branch of the motion are not properly before this Court *(see Witkowski v Escobar,*28 AJDSd 543 [2006]; *Levy v Levy,*20 AD3d 511 [2005]; *Katz v Katz,*68 AD2d 536, 542-543 [1979]). Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                            SUBSIDIARIES OF WESTCORP

Western Financial Bank, a Federal Savings Bank
WFS Financial Inc, a California corporation
WFS Financial Auto Loans, Inc., a California corporation 
WFS Financial Auto Loans 2, Inc., a California corporation 
WFS Investments, Inc., a California corporation
Western Consumer Services, Inc., a California corporation
WestFin Insurance Agency, Inc., a California corporation
Western Reconveyance Company, Inc., a California corporation 
WestFin Securities Corporation, a California corporation
Westhrift Life Insurance Company, an Arizona corporation
Westran Services Corp., a California corporation 
Westcorp Investments, Inc., a California corporation
The Hammond Company, The Mortgage Bankers, a California corporation
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1241 

To expand the private right of action under the Telephone Consumer 

Protection Act for calls in violation of the Do Not Call rules. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 30, 2019 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. MARKEY, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Ms. 

KLOBUCHAR, and Ms. SMITH) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To expand the private right of action under the Telephone 

Consumer Protection Act for calls in violation of the 

Do Not Call rules. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting American 

5 Consumers from Robocalls Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION FOR CALLS IN VIOLA7 TION OF DO NOT CALL RULES. 

8 Section 227(c)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934 

9 (47 U.S.C. 227(c)(5)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1241 IS

1 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), 

2 by striking ‘‘more than one telephone call within any 

3 12-month period by or on behalf of the same entity’’ 

4 and inserting ‘‘a telephone call by or on behalf of an 

5 entity’’; and 

6 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘up to’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1301 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1301

   To prohibit the use of the poisons sodium fluoroacetate (known as 
      ``Compound 1080'') and sodium cyanide for predator control.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 2, 2019

Mr. Merkley (for himself and Mr. Booker) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the use of the poisons sodium fluoroacetate (known as 
      ``Compound 1080'') and sodium cyanide for predator control.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chemical Poisons Reduction Act of 
2019'' or ``Canyon's Law''.

SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

    The purpose of this Act is to restrict the use of the poisons 
sodium fluoroacetate (known as ``Compound 1080'') and sodium cyanide to 
kill predatory animals due to the risks posed by those poisons to--
            (1) public safety;
            (2) national security;
            (3) the environment; and
            (4) persons and other animals that come into accidental 
        contact with those poisons.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON USE OF CERTAIN POISONS FOR PREDATOR CONTROL.

    (a) Definition of Predator Control Device.--In this section, the 
term ``predator control device'' means--
            (1) a dispenser designed to propel sodium fluoroacetate or 
        sodium cyanide when activated by an animal;
            (2) a livestock protection collar designed to release 
        sodium fluoroacetate or sodium cyanide when punctured by an 
        animal;
            (3) a gas cartridge or other pyrotechnic device designed to 
        emit sodium fluoroacetate or sodium cyanide fumes when 
        activated by an animal; and
            (4) any other means of dispensing sodium fluoroacetate or 
        sodium cyanide, including in the form of capsules, for wildlife 
        management or other animal control purposes.
    (b) Prohibition.--It shall be unlawful to use sodium fluoroacetate 
(known as ``Compound 1080'') or sodium cyanide in a predator control 
device.
    (c) Penalty.--Any person that violates subsection (b) shall be 
fined under title 18, United States Code, imprisoned for not more than 
2 years, or both.
                                 <all>
```
|                                         | 31.1                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|---------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
|                                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|I, Lisa Norman, certify that:           
|1.                                       | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Home Alliance Corporation.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|2.                                       | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.
|3.                                       | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results from operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.                





|By:  /s/Lisa NormanLisa Norman
Chief Executive Officer & Chairman | Date:  October 24, 2012
|----------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------
[896 NYS2d 799]

#### B.Y., M.D., P.C., et al., as Assignees of Beverly Prince, Appellants, v Government Employees Insurance Company, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

January 28, 2010

*96APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Amos Weinberg,*Great Neck, for appellants. *Law Offices of Teresa M. Spina,*Woodbury *(Emilio A. Cacace*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the order is affirmed without costs.

In this action by providers to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiffs moved for “partial summary judgment,” asserting that, pursuant to CPLR 3212 (e) or, in the alternative, CPLR 3212 (g), the District Court should determine that plaintiffs had established their prima facie case with respect to their first cause of action. In opposition to the motion, defendant argued, among other things, that there was a lack of medical necessity for the services at issue. The District Court denied plaintiffs’ motion, and this appeal by plaintiffs ensued.

Plaintiffs’ contention that, pursuant to either CPLR 3212 (e) or, in the alternative, CPLR 3212 (g), they were entitled to “partial summary judgment” determining that they had established their prima facie case with respect to their first cause of action lacks merit. The branch of plaintiffs’ motion seeking “partial summary judgment” pursuant to CPLR 3212 (e) was properly denied as the relief requested would not conclusively dispose of the merits of plaintiffs’ first cause of action or even a part of that cause of action *(see*CPLR 3212 [e]).

Similarly, relief pursuant to CPLR 3212 (g) is not available to plaintiffs. This provision states that “[i]f a motion for summary judgment is denied or is granted in part, the court, by examining the papers before it and, in the discretion of the court, by interrogating counsel, shall, if practicable, ascertain what facts are not in dispute or are incontrovertible.” As the court did not deny, or grant in part, a motion which sought summary judgment conclusively disposing of the merits of plaintiffs’ cause of action, plaintiffs’ motion seeking a limitation of issues of fact for trial pursuant to CPLR 3212 (g) was properly denied *(see*Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3212:35; *see generally E.B. Metal & Rubber Indus. v County of Washington,*102 AD2d 599 [1984]). Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

*97Nicolai, EJ., Tanenbaum and LaCava, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Monarch Financial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                     |  |                  
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|/s/ Brad E. Schwartz                                
|Brad E. Schwartz,                                   
|Chief Executive Officer                             
|                                                    
|/s/ Lynette P. Harris.                              
|Lynette P. Harris                                   
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                     | 
|Date:                                                |  | November 15, 2010



43
Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

The undersigned, Corey L. Johnson is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Silver State Bancorp (the Company).

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | (A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |                     
|---------------- |  | --------------------
|November 9, 2007 |  | /s/ Corey L. Johnson
|Dated            |  | Corey L. Johnson
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1216 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1216

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
  depreciation rules for property used predominantly within an Indian 
                              reservation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 11, 2019

  Mr. Inhofe introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
  depreciation rules for property used predominantly within an Indian 
                              reservation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF DEPRECIATION RULES FOR PROPERTY ON 
              INDIAN RESERVATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (j) of section 168 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking paragraph (9).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property placed in service after December 31, 2017.
                                 <all>
```