alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 JANUARY 12, 2010

JOHN LEY

ACTING CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-11774

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

Agency No. A077-922-409

HUGO POLYCARPE,

Petitioner,

versus

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

________________________

Petition for Review of a Decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

_________________________

(January 12, 2010)

Before BLACK, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
Hugo Polycarpe, a native and citizen of Haiti, petitions for review of the

denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal under the

Immigration and Nationality Act and relief under the Convention Against Torture

and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. INA §

241(b)(3), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158, 1231(b)(3); 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(c). The immigration

judge found that Polycarpe failed to prove that he suffered past persecution on

account of a protected ground or a probability of future persecution or torture if he

returns to Haiti, and the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed that decision

without opinion. We deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the finding that Polycarpe did not suffer past

persecution on account of his political opinion. After Polycarpe and 300 members

of his village stole building supplies from government trucks, the government

issued a warrant for his arrest. Prosecution for a crime does not constitute

persecution unless the prosecution is based on a protected ground and the

punishment is sufficiently extreme to constitute persecution. Scheerer v. U.S.

Att’y Gen., 445 F.3d 1311, 1315–16 (11th Cir. 2006). Prosecution is not a

disproportionate punishment for theft.

Substantial evidence also supports the finding that Polycarpe would not be

singled out for mistreatment on account of his political beliefs if he returned to

Haiti. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(b)(1); Sepulveda v. U.S. Att’y Gen ., 401 F.3d 1226,

2
1231 (11th Cir. 2005). Polycarpe argues that members of Lavalas “came shooting

and looking” for him and the government cannot protect him from mob violence,

but Polycarpe evaded arrest with the assistance of a friend who was a member of

Lavalas. Polycarpe’s concerns about widespread lawlessness do not establish a

fear of persecution on account of protected ground. Polycarpe’s wife and children

have relocated within Haiti without incident. See Ruiz v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 440

F.3d 1247, 1259 (11th Cir. 2006).

We DENY Polycarpe’s petition for review.

PETITION DENIED.

3
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                   (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,
                  CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of National Datacomputer, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Form
10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 30, 2004              /s/ John P. Ward
                                   ------------------------------
                                   John P. Ward
                                   Chairman of the Board, President and
                                   Chief Executive Officer


Dated: March 30, 2004              /s/ Gerald S. Eilberg
                                   ------------------------------
                                   Gerald S. Eilberg
                                   Senior Vice President of Finance and
                                   Administration and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
Velocity Asset Management, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2004, I, John
C. Kleinert, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.      Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004,
        fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
        year ended December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of Velocity Asset
        Management, Inc.

                                            VELOCITY ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.



Dated: May 24, 2005                        By: /s/ JOHN C. KLEINERT
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               John C. Kleinert, President and
                                               Chief Executive Officer
#### Liliana Barbu et al., Respondents, v Napoleon Savescu et al., Defendants, and Jay D. Tartell et al., Appellants.

[856 NYS2d 629]

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the appellants’ motion which was pursuant to CFLR 3216 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them. The plaintiffs filed a timely note of issue and there is no indication in the record that the note of issue was ever vacated. Relief pursuant to CPLR 3216 is no longer available based on a plaintiffs unreasonable neglect to proceed or delay in the prosecution of an action after the filing of the note of issue *(see Chase v Scavuzzo,*87 NY2d 228, 231, 233 [1995]; *Ballestero v Haf Edgecombe Assoc., L.P.,*33 AD3d 952, 953 [2006]; *Basetti v Nour,*287 AD2d 126, 128 [2001]; *Lopez v Imperial Delivery Serv.,*282 AD2d 190, 194 [2001]).

Furthermore, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the appellants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3404 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them. There was no proof that the action was marked “off” the calendar as that term is used in CPLR 3404. The issuance of a stay of the action was not the equivalent of marking the case “off’ the calendar *(see Ballestero v Haf Edgecombe Assoc., L.P.,*33 AD3d at 953; *see generally Basetti v Nour,*287 AD2d at 132-133). *679Fisher, J.P., Florio, Angiolillo, Dickerson and Belen, JJ., concur. *[See*2007 NY Slip Op 30578(U).]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 14 (Friday, January 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1554]



[[Page 4260]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Federal Register Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS:  Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

DATES: Week of January 26, 2009.

PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS:  Public and Closed.

ADDITIONAL ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Week of January 26, 2009

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

1:25 p.m.
    Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (Tentative).
    a. Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation (License Amendment Request 
for Decommissioning of the Newfield, New Jersey Facility) (Tentative).

    This meeting will be Webcast live at the Web address--http://www.nrc.gov.
    *The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short 
notice. To verify the status of meetings, call (recording)--(301) 415-
1292. Contact person for more information: Rochelle Bavol, (301) 415-
1651.
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policy-making/schedule.html.
    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation 
to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or 
the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another 
format (e.g., braille, large print), please notify the NRC's Disability 
Program Coordinator, Rohn Brown, at 301-492-2279, TDD: 301-415-2100, or 
by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a08151214541808150d143a140819541d150c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ff8d909791d19d8d908891bf918d9cd1989089">[email protected]</span></a>. Determinations on requests for 
reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.
    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the 
distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, 
DC 20555 (301-415-1969). In addition, distribution of this meeting 
notice over the Internet system is available. If you are interested in 
receiving this Commission meeting schedule electronically, please send 
an electronic message to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#422623302e272c276c35302b252a36022c30216c252d34"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cbafaab9a7aea5aee5bcb9a2aca3bf8ba5b9a8e5aca4bd">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 16, 2009.
Rochelle C. Bavol,
Office of the Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-1554 Filed 1-21-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JUL 23 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

SAMUEL J. WILDER, Plaintiff - Appellant,

vs. PEGGY KNIGHT; MAE ALICE WARD, Eastern Stars; KENNETH KING, dba Finch Investments; OMAR R. FINCH; TULSA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; DAVID L. PETERSON, District Judge; CURTIS ECKWOOD, dba Eckwood Enterprises; CELESTER PETTY; RICHARD RAVITS, attorney; STANLEY GLANZ, sheriff; RONALD SHAFFER, DistrictJudge; LINDA REDWINE, Tulsa CityCounty Health Department; VERETTA CARTER, Neighborhood Housing Services of Tulsa; SARAH HAWXBY, Oklahoma Human Rights Commission; LESLIE PEPPER, Oklahoma Corporation Commission; JOHN SHARP, Oklahoma Natural Gas Company; W. HIDDLE, Judge; DOUG DODD, Public Service Co. of Oklahoma; CARLOS J. CHAPPELLE, attorney, Defendants - Appellees. No. 96-5171 (D.C. No. 95-CV-1130) (N.D. Okla.)* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. - 2 - ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before BRORBY, EBEL, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. **
Mr. Wilder, appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from the dismissal of his civil rights action without prejudice for failure to effect service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). We review the dismissal for an abuse of discretion. Espinosa v. United States , 52 F.3d 838, 841 (10th Cir. 1995). Mr. Wilder filed his complaint on November 13, 1995. He was granted leave to file the action without prepayment of fees or costs, with any further proceedings requiring the specific authorization of the district court. I R. doc. 2. The district court entered its order of dismissal on June 20, 1996. Under Rule 4(m) and Espinosa , a plaintiff is entitled to a mandatory extension of time to serve for good cause shown, and a permissive extension in the absence of good cause. 52 F.3d at 841. Although the district court did not elaborate on its reasoning, no- 3 -

good cause appears in the record. In his brief on appeal, Mr. Wilder contends that he completed summonses for each defendant, as well as forms for marshal service and entrusted the clerk to forward the latter to the marshal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). He also contends that he attempted to serve one defendant by mail, although it is apparent that it was not in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). Despite the lack of returns of service, the record reveals no further attempt at service, nor any attempt to bring the problem to the attention of the district court. Under the circumstances of the case, the district court did not abuse its discretion.
AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court
Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
NOTICE OF APPEAL TO

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

U.S. District Court – Eastern District of Pennsylvania 

(PHILADELPHIA)

JAMES WRIGHT,

Appellant(s),

-againstHARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES 

GROUP; THE HARTFORD BENEFIT 

MANAGEMENT SERVICES; GDB CLAIMS 

AND SERVICES OPERATIONS; ABC 1-

10 (that being the names of the 

corporate entities, companies, 

partnership or individuals 

intended),

Appellee(s).

Civil Action No.: 2:11-cv-00602

Hon. Faith S. Hochberg, U.S.D.J.

Notice is hereby given that appellant, James Wright, appeals 

to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from 

an Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and 

granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment entered in this 

action on May 11, 2012.

DATED:

/s/ Kevin T. Kutyla

___________________________

Kevin T. Kutyla

Counsel for Appellant

Attorney ID #KTK8626

83 Spring Street, Ste. 302B

Newton, NJ 07860

973-940-8970

973-940-8973

Case 2:11-cv-00602-FSH-MAH Document 75 Filed 06/08/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 2044
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 A1 16 3 . TI MOTHY W OODARD v . DARRELL DI X.

Pri s o n er Ti m o t h y

W o o d ward p et i ti o n ed t h e Sp al d i n g Co u n t y Su p eri o r Co u rt fo r p erm is s i o n t o fi l e a h ab eas co rp u s pet i ti o n , n am i n g Sh eri ff Darrel l Di x as t h e d efen d an t

. Al t h o ug h t h e s u p eri o r co u rt g ran t ed t h e pet i t i o n , t h e s u p eri o r co u rt

s u b s eq u en t l y g ran t ed D i x ’ s m o t i o n t o d i s m i s s

. W o o d ard fi l ed t h i s ap peal fro m t h e
t ri al co u rt ’ s d i s m i s s al o rd er. Un d er o ur Co n s t i t u ti o n , th e Su p rem e Co u rt h as e xc lusiv e ap p el l at e j u ri s d i ct i o n

o v er al l h ab eas co rp u s cas es

. See Ga. Co n s t. o f 1 9 8 3, Art

. VI, Se c

. V I , P a r. III (4 ).
Becau s e W o o d ard s eek s t o ap p eal t h e d i s m i s s al o f a h ab eas act i o n , i t ap p ears ju ri s d i ct i o n m ay li e i n t h e Su prem e Co urt

. As t h e Su p rem e Co u rt h as t h e u l t i m at e

res p o n s i b i l i t y

fo r d et erm i n in g ap pel l at e ju ri s d i ct i o n, see S a xt o n v. Co as t a l Di a l

ys i s & Med

. Cl i n i c , 2 6 7 Ga. 1 77 , 1 7 8 (4 7 6 SE2 d 5 8 7 ) (1 99 6 ), t h i s ap pl i cat io n i s h ereb y TRANSFERRED t o t h e Su prem e Co u rt fo r d i s p os i t i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. April 12, 2022

04/12/2022
EXHIBIT 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 To the Board of Directors of Soligenix, Inc.
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 29, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2010 and for the year then ended, which appears in this Form 10-K,  and in the following documents: in the registration statements (Nos. 333-162375 and 333-167792) on Forms S-1; in the registration statements (Nos. 333-157322, 333-149239, 333-162375, and 333-167792) on Forms S-1/A;  and in the registration statement on Form S-8 of Soligenix, Inc. and subsidiaries.
 
 
 
 /s/ EisnerAmper LLP
 March 29, 2011
 Edison, New Jersey
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1062 

To provide authorization for nonpecuniary damages in an action resulting 

from a cruise ship accident occurring on the high seas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 8, 2019 

Mrs. FISCHER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To provide authorization for nonpecuniary damages in an 

action resulting from a cruise ship accident occurring 

on the high seas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hammers’ Law’’. 

5 SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS IN CERTAIN CASES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 30307 of title 46, United 

7 States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘Com9 mercial aviation accidents’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘Limitations in certain cases’’; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1062 IS

1 (2) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

4 ‘‘(1) CRUISE SHIP.—The term ‘cruise ship’ 

5 means a passenger vessel, other than a vessel of the 

6 United States operated by the Federal Government 

7 or a vessel owned and operated by a State, that— 

8 ‘‘(A) is authorized to carry at least 250 

9 passengers; 

10 ‘‘(B) has onboard sleeping facilities for 

11 each passenger; 

12 ‘‘(C) is on a voyage that embarks or dis13 embarks passengers in the United States; and 

14 ‘‘(D) is not engaged on a coastwise voyage. 

15 ‘‘(2) NONPECUNIARY DAMAGES.—The term 

16 ‘nonpecuniary damages’ means damages for loss of 

17 care, comfort, and companionship.’’; 

18 (3) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘or cruise 

19 ship’’ after ‘‘commercial aviation’’; and 

20 (4) in subsection (c), by inserting ‘‘or cruise 

21 ship’’ after ‘‘commercial aviation’’. 

22 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

23 for chapter 303 of title 46, United States Code, is amendVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:41 Apr 11, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1062.IS S1062

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 1062 IS

1 ed by striking the item relating to section 30307 and in2 serting the following: 

‘‘30307. Limitations in certain cases.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 798 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 798

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 15, 2020

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Appointing and authorizing managers for the impeachment trial of Donald 
              John Trump, President of the United States.

    Resolved, That Mr. Schiff, Mr. Nadler, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Jeffries, 
Mrs. Demings, Mr. Crow, and Ms. Garcia of Texas are appointed managers 
to conduct the impeachment trial against Donald John Trump, President 
of the United States, that a message be sent to the Senate to inform 
the Senate of these appointments, and that the managers so appointed 
may, in connection with the preparation and the conduct of the trial, 
exhibit the articles of impeachment to the Senate and take all other 
actions necessary, which may include the following:
            (1) Employing legal, clerical, and other necessary 
        assistants and incurring such other expenses as may be 
        necessary, to be paid from amounts available to the Committee 
        on the Judiciary under applicable expense resolutions or from 
        the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives.
            (2) Sending for persons and papers, and filing with the 
        Secretary of the Senate, on the part of the House of 
        Representatives, any pleadings, in conjunction with or 
        subsequent to, the exhibition of the articles of impeachment 
        that the managers consider necessary.
                                  NANCY PELOSI,

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit No. 32.1**

Form 10-Q

Marketing Acquisition Corporation

File No. 0-52072

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September        30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy P. Halter, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) |   | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |   |   |
|--------|-----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|        |     |        |                                                                                                                                                 |        |        |
|   | (2) |   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |   |   |

 

| Date: November 10, 2009 |   |  By: |  /s/ Timothy P. Halter |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|-----------|-----------------------------|--------|--------|
|                         |   |      | Timothy P. Halter           |   |   |
|                         |   |      | Chief Executive             |   |   |
|                         |   |      | and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |

----

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Marketing Acquisition Corporation and will be retained        by Marketing Acquisition Corporation  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:11-cv-00630-DMC -JAD   Document 9    Filed 04/14/11   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 32

Case 2:11-cv-00630-DMC -JAD   Document 9    Filed 04/14/11   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 33