alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              73                     127
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      73                     127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,850                   7,350
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        15,000                  15,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,777)                (22,223)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        73                     127
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      554                     411
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (554)                   (411)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (554)                   (411)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40105

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

ZACHARY DAMON TULLIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 360

Filed: February 12, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Lynn G. Norton, District Judge. 

Appeal from order revoking probation and executing underlying sentence of a 

unified term of seven years, with two years determinate, for statutory 

rape, dismissed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben Patrick McGreevy, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Daphne J. Huang, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Zachary Damon Tullis pled guilty to statutory rape. Idaho Code § 18-6101(1). The 

district court withheld judgment and placed Tullis on probation. Approximately two years later, 

Tullis admitted to violating the terms of his probation. The district court revoked the withheld 

judgment and sentenced Tullis to a unified term of seven years, with two years determinate, but 

retained jurisdiction. At the conclusion of the period of retained jurisdiction, the district court 

suspended Tullis’s sentence and placed him on probation. Several months later, Tullis again 

admitted to violating numerous terms of his probation. The district court consequently revoked 

probation and ordered execution of the underlying sentence. Tullis filed an Idaho Criminal 
2

Rule 35 motion for reduction of his sentence, which the district court denied. Tullis now 

appeals, contending the district court abused its discretion by executing his underlying sentence 

without reduction.

The State contends Tullis’s appeal is untimely and should be dismissed. Pursuant to 

Idaho Appellate Rule 21, failure to file a notice of appeal with the clerk of the district court 

within the time limits prescribed by the appellate rules deprives the appellate courts of 

jurisdiction over the appeal. Idaho Appellate Rule 14 provides, in part:

Any appeal . . . may be made only by physically filing a notice of appeal 

with the clerk of the district court within 42 days from the date evidenced by the 

filing stamp of the clerk of the court on any judgment, order, or decree of the 

district court appealable as a matter of right in any civil or criminal action.

Tullis’s notice of appeal was filed forty-three days after the date the order revoking probation 

and executing the underlying sentence was entered. In his reply brief, Tullis concedes his appeal 

is untimely. We, therefore, lack jurisdiction to address the substantive issues of the appeal. See 

State v. Payan, 128 Idaho 866, 867, 920 P.2d 82, 83 (Ct. App. 1996). Tullis’s appeal from the 

order revoking probation and executing the underlying sentence is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of

MAVERICK BANCORPORATION, INC.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Maverick Bancorporation, Inc., hereby certifies that:

1. Maverick Bancorporation, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Maverick Bancorporation, Inc.

/S/ Wayne M. Woodruff
Wayne M. Woodruff
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 16, 2006
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

August 11, 2006

U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission450 Fifth Street, N. W.Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The certification set forth below is being submitted tothe Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying withSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Thiscertification is not to be deemed to be filed pursuant to the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q(the “Report”) accompanying this letter and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing, whether made before or after the date hereof,regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

I, Robert E.Driscoll, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Mirant North America,LLC (the “Company”), certify that, subject to the qualifications noted below,to the best of my knowledge:

1.                 the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                 theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Mirant AmericasGeneration, LLC.
| Name:  | /s/ ROBERT E.  DRISCOLL                 |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert E. Driscoll                      |
|   | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Mirant North America, LLC and will beretained by Mirant North America, LLC and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Filed 11/1/13 P. v. Keene CA5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent ,

v.

JOSHUA JUSTIN KEENE , Defendan t and Appellant

. F065512
(Super. Ct. No. RF6312A)



### OPINION

THE COURT * APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. John D. Oglesby, Judge. Alison E. Kaylor , under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Ap pellant.
Of fice of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

- ooOoo

-

* Before Kane , Acting P.J., Detjen, J. and Peña , J.2

Appellant, Joshua J ustin Keene, pled no contest to petty theft with a prior (Pen. Code, § 666). Following independent review of the record pursuant to Peop le v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 ( Wende ) , we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On September 4, 2 011, Ci ndy McWhorter, a man a ger at a Wal

- M art store in Ridgecrest , saw Keene take an iPhone 3G from a store display counter. On September 5, 201 1 , McW h orter called the police after seeing Keene in the store again. Two o fficer s soon arrived at the store an d contacted Keene as he sat on a bench. Keene told the officers he was there to return a phone that was not working

pr operly. An officer ran a check on Keene and discovered Keene was on parole for burglary. After one of the officers reviewed the surv ei l l ance video from the previous day, he informed Keene that he believed Keene was the same subject who took an iPhone from the display counter because Ke ene was wearing the sa m e clothes. When t he
officers showed Keene the video , Keene s t ated he did not remember taking the phone but he may h a ve done so by accident. On June 11, 2012, the district attorney filed an information charging Keene with petty thef t with a prior (count 1) and three prior prison term enh a ncements (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)). On June 19, 2012, Keene entered his plea to the petty theft with a prior conviction in exchange for a stipulated low term of 16 months and the dismissal o f the three prior prison term enhancements. On July 17, 2012, after Keene waived presentence custody credit for time he
served on a related parole violation, t he court denied Keene probation and sentenced him
to a 16

- month term in local custody.

Keene ’s appellate counsel has filed a brief which summarizes the facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks this court to independently review the3

record. ( W

ende , supra , 25 Cal.3d 436.) Keene has not responded to this court’s
invitation t o submit additional briefing. Following an independent review of the record we find that no reasonably arguable factual or legal issues exist.
DISPOSITION The judgment is affirmed.
Three Questions

About Consumer Spending

and the Middle Class

June 22, 2010

This information is for research purposes only

and does not reflect the policy or views of theObama administration

Jared Bernstein

Office of the Vice President
Disclaimer

• This information information is for research research purpose

purpose

and does not reflect the policy or views 

Obama administration.
Three Questions:

1. How do we define the middle class, and how do w

measure measure their progress? progress? This calls for differentia

differentia

actual consumption (and saving) against

a more

prescriptive assessment.

2. If we give up on prescription, prescription, we still should be in

in

in relative consumption differences across incom

classes. What is the trend in consumption inequ

how does it relate to income ine

q y) uality)

?

3. Underlying both absolute and relative consumpti

challenges facing the middle class is the growing 

between

p y roductivit

y and com

pensation. A si

gni

share of the growth in the gap (about

a third) sin

is due to the difference in growth rates between 

and consumer deflators. How can we better und

th l f h h

e implications

o

f

t

his

d ? ivergence

?
Source: Department of Commerce, “Middle Class in America.” Underlying data from various sources.
8.0% Growth in Real Income and Consumption

by Income Quintile, 2000‐2007

4 0%6.0%2.0%4.0%

2000‐2007

Middle Fifth

Middle Fifth

1.5%

0.0%

ercent growth,2

Middle Fifth

‐1.7% Top Fifth

‐1.9%

‐2.0%

Pe

Bottom Fifth

‐5.6%

Bottom Fifth

‐5.2%

‐4.0%

‐6.0%

Income Growth Consumption G

Source: Current Expenditure Survey, CPS ASEC.
200%

Decomposition of Wage‐Productivity Disparity, 1979‐20

180%160%

m 1979

Re

140%

ent change from

Av

Productivity

120%

Perce

W

100% R

Real Non‐Managerial Wages

80%

1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
6% Consumer Prices Outpace Product Deflators

4 5%

5% 5.1%

od

3.6%

4.5%

4% 4.1%

uring time perio

2.7% 

3%

ate of growthdu

2.0%

2% 

Annualizedr

tor

tor

tor

1%

plicit Price Defla ‐U‐RS plicit Price Defla ‐U‐RS plicit Price Defla ‐U‐RS 

0%

1973‐2009 1979‐89 1989‐2000 

Imp

CPI‐

Imp

CPI‐

Imp

CPI‐

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Case 1:11-cv-01650-JEI -JS Document 3 Filed 03/24/11 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 54
Case 1:11-cv-01650-JEI -JS Document 3 Filed 03/24/11 Page 2 of 14 PageID: 55
Case 1:11-cv-01650-JEI -JS Document 3 Filed 03/24/11 Page 3 of 14 PageID: 56
Case 1:11-cv-01650-JEI -JS Document 3 Filed 03/24/11 Page 4 of 14 PageID: 57
Case 1:11-cv-01650-JEI -JS Document 3 Filed 03/24/11 Page 5 of 14 PageID: 58
Case 1:11-cv-01650-JEI -JS Document 3 Filed 03/24/11 Page 6 of 14 PageID: 59
Case 1:11-cv-01650-JEI -JS Document 3 Filed 03/24/11 Page 7 of 14 PageID: 60
Case 1:11-cv-01650-JEI -JS Document 3 Filed 03/24/11 Page 8 of 14 PageID: 61
Case 1:11-cv-01650-JEI -JS Document 3 Filed 03/24/11 Page 9 of 14 PageID: 62
Case 1:11-cv-01650-JEI -JS Document 3 Filed 03/24/11 Page 10 of 14 PageID: 63
Case 1:11-cv-01650-JEI -JS Document 3 Filed 03/24/11 Page 11 of 14 PageID: 64
Case 1:11-cv-01650-JEI -JS Document 3 Filed 03/24/11 Page 12 of 14 PageID: 65
Case 1:11-cv-01650-JEI -JS Document 3 Filed 03/24/11 Page 13 of 14 PageID: 66
Case 1:11-cv-01650-JEI -JS Document 3 Filed 03/24/11 Page 14 of 14 PageID: 67
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 132 (Monday, July 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16475]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC), announces the following meeting of the aforementioned 
committee:

    Time and Date: 8 a.m.-4 p.m., July 29, 2009.
    Place: CDC, Tom Harkin Global Communications Center, 1600 
Clifton Road, NE., Building 19, Kent ``Oz'' Nelson Auditorium, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30333.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available.
    Purpose: The committee is charged with advising the Director, 
CDC, on the appropriate uses of immunizing agents. In addition, 
under 42 U.S.C. Section 1396s, the committee is mandated to 
establish and periodically review and, as appropriate, revise the 
list of vaccines for administration to vaccine-eligible children 
through the Vaccines for Children program, along with schedules 
regarding the appropriate periodicity, dosage, and contraindications 
applicable to the vaccines.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The agenda will include discussions 
related to recommendations for use of influenza vaccines in the 
prevention and control of novel (pandemic) influenza A (H1N1); novel 
H1N1 epidemiology in the United States; novel H1N epidemiology, 
international settings; modeling novel H1N1 influenza impact and 
impact of vaccination; implementation planning; vaccine development 
and formulation; and the Food and Drug Administration/Vaccines and 
Related Biological Products Advisory Committee update. Agenda items 
are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Antonette Hill, 
Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and 
Respiratory Diseases, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E-05, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: (404) 639-8836, Fax: (404) 639-
8905.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities for both the CDC and Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: July 6, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-16475 Filed 7-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-18-P
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Network Communications, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC.October 20, 2006
    /s/  Daniel R. McCarthyDaniel R. McCarthyChairman and
Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41206 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. DARREN RAILEY Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-10-ALL Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Counsel appointed to represent Darren Railey has moved for leave to withdrawand has filed a briefin accordance with Andersv. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Railey has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANT ED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 25, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dekania Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Vernhes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 14, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Paul Vernhes       
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Paul Vernhes           
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:11-cv-01160-AET -DEA Document 13 Filed 09/02/11 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 86
Case 3:11-cv-01160-AET -DEA Document 13 Filed 09/02/11 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 87
Case 3:11-cv-01160-AET -DEA Document 13 Filed 09/02/11 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 88
Case 3:11-cv-01160-AET -DEA Document 13 Filed 09/02/11 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 89