alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 144 Filed 07/15/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 2461
Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 144 Filed 07/15/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 2462
Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 144 Filed 07/15/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 2463
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Richard Heyse,
certify that:

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innophos Holdings, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided Innophos Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Innophos
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned expressly disclaims any
obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: August 7, 2008



/s/ RICHARD HEYSERichard HeyseVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as a part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



46
EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Daniel Baker, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bronco Energy Fund, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading  with respect to the period  covered by this  report;  3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report,  fairly present in all material  respects the financial  condition,
results of operations,  changes in net assets,  and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's  other
certifying  officers and I are  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining
disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
      disclosure  controls and procedures to be designed under our  supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,  including
      its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
      entities,  particularly  during the  period in which this  report is being
      prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions  about  the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,  as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)  disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
      control over  financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially  affected,  or is reasonably
      likely to  materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal  control  over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
      operation  of  internal   control  over  financial   reporting  which  are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process, summarize, and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.


Date: March 31, 2005

/s/ Daniel Baker
----------------
Daniel Baker, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Neil I. Salmon, certify that:

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innophos Holdings, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided Innophos Holdings, Inc. and will be retained
by Innophos Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned
expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: August 3, 2010



/S/ NEIL I. SALMONNeil I. SalmonVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed
as a part of the Report.
#### TOOMEY v. WICKWIRE SPENCER STEEL CO. et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Oct. 20, 1942.

*244John V. Lizars, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Larkin, Rathbone & Perry, of New York City, for defendants.

MANDELBAUM, District judge.

This is a motion by the plaintiff for an order directing the defendants to furnish him with a list of stockholders of the defendant corporation. The defendants, by cross-motion, have prayed for an order dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state facts constituting a valid claim for relief.

Plaintiff’s motion denied. Defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint granted.

The plaintiff has failed to comply with Rule 23(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, in that his complaint lacks certain essential allegations. To be valid, the complaint should have stated “that the action is not a collusive one to confer on a court of the United States jurisdiction of any action of which it would not otherwise have jurisdiction”. The complaint should also have “set forth with particularity the efforts of the plaintiff to secure from the managing directors or trustees and, if necessary, from the shareholders such action as he desires, and the reasons for his failure to obtain such action or the reasons for not making such effort”, as is required by that Rule. The plaintiff’s allegation of stock ownership as demanded by Rule 23(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is not satisfactorily set forth in paragraph 23 of the complaint or elsewhere. From the above it may be seen that Rule 8(a)(2) which demands “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief” is not met by a complaint which sets forth a hazy mass of conclusions unhampered by any plain statements of the facts upon which the prayer for relief is based.

Since the plaintiff’s complaint is .dismissed, there is no need to discuss the plaintiff’s application for an order directing the defendants to furnish him with a list of the stockholders in the defendant corporation. Although it is not disputed that the New York Stock Corporation Law, Consol. Laws N.Y. c. 59, does provide that certain shareholders may obtain such information for specified purposes, that right, if there be one, should be enforced in the proper tribunal. Rule 81(b) has abolished mandamus and I know of no provision in the Rules which will permit the plaintiff the relief his motion seeks.
Exhibit 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



Board of Directors

Velocity Asset Management, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of Velocity Asset Management, Inc. of our report dated July 15, 2005
related to the consolidated balance sheets of Velocity Asset Management, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, which report is included in
the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 4, of Velocity
Asset Management, Inc.


/s/ COWAN, GUNTESKI & CO., P.A.

Cowan,Gunteski & Co., P.A.

Toms River, New Jersey


August 10, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16559]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1342-000]


Grand Ridge Energy V LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

July 7, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Grand Ridge Energy V LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is July 27, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b3d3e293834151712151e280e0b0b14090f3b1d1e0918551c140d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8dcbc8dfcec2e3e1e4e3e8def8fdfde2fff9cdebe8ffeea3eae2fb">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-16559 Filed 7-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JORDAN JEAN-BAPTISTE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1949

[September 30, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.801 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Thomas M. Lynch, V, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 19-8675CF10A.

Jordan Jean-Baptiste, Indiantown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Susser Holdings Corporation (the Company) for the three ended April 1, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sam L. Susser, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                             |  |                                       |  |                  
|------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|Date: May 16 , 2007 |  |  |  | SUSSER HOLDINGS CORPORATION
|                    |  |  |  |                            
|                    |  |  |  |                             |  | By                                    |  | /s/ Sam L. Susser
|                    |  |  |  |                             |  | Sam L. Susser                        
|                    |  |  |  |                             |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(a)

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
(Form S-8, Nos. 33-17196, 33-44822, 33-44877, 33-44876, 33-22459, 33-38491,
33-54075, 33-54079, 33-54077, 333-47833, 333-28273, 333-38752, 333-62568,
333-62572, and Form S-3, Nos. 33-36001 and 333-60175) pertaining to various
stock option, employee savings, deferred compensation and restricted stock plans
and a universal shelf registration statement of Wellman, Inc. of our report
dated February 12, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and financial statement schedules included in this Form 10-K/A of Wellman, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2002.

                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina
April 29, 2003
EXHIBIT 31.1 / 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS  I, Floricel Leiton, certify that:  1.      I have reviewed
this report on Form 10-Q of Coronado Corp.  2.      Based on my
knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.      Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;  4.      I am responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)
for the Registrant and have;  (a)  Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal
control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness
of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any
change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.      I have disclosed,
based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies
and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Registrants ability to record, process,summarize and report
financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  August 18,
2009

/s/Floricel LeitonFloricel Leition
Principal Executive and Financial
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                        5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   334,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (334,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.01


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7320

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1)

Submitted: December 15, 2015 Decided: December 18, 2015

Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Edward Chestnut, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley 

Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Edward Chestnut appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant 

to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Hon. Katherine S. Hayden 

v. : Criminal No. 011-165

ROCCO MAZZAFERRO : O R D E R

This matter having been opened to the Court, on the

joint application of the United States Attorney for the District

of New Jersey (Leslie Faye Schwartz, Assistant U.S. Attorney,

appearing) and defendant Rocco Mazzaferro (Michael Rosen, Esq.,

appearing), to deposit a restitution check in the amount of

$43,607, into the District of New Jersey Court Registry, prior to

sentencing in the above-captioned matter, and good cause having

been shown,

IT IS, therefore, on this 5 day of July 2012, ORDERED th

that the Clerk’s Office of the District of New Jersey deposit the

$43,607 into the Court Registry, to be held there until further

order of the Court. 

/s/ Katharine S. Hayden

 

KATHARINE S. HAYDEN

United States District Judge