alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Minutes of Proceeding

OFFICE: TRENTON

JUDGE FREDA L. WOLFSON, U.S.D.J. Date: July 9, 2012

Court Reporter: Vincent Russoniello

TITLE OF CASE: CIVIL 11-1086(FLW)

IN RE :

NUTELLA MARKETING AND

SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION

APPEARANCES:

James E. Cecchi, Esq for Plaintiff, Stephan Weiss, Esq., Joseph Guglielmo, Esq. Greg Davis, Esq., Erin Green

Comite, Esq.,

Keith Eggleton, Esq.,for Defendant

Daniel Greenberg, Esq. Class Member

Lester Levy, Esq. Objector - Amy Ades

Chris Langone, Esq. for Objectors - Agatha Bocherck, Brandon Goodman and Edward Hasele

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:

Hearing on MOTION(#68) to Certify Class and Granting Final Approval of Proposed Class Settlement by

MARNIE GLOVER, JAYME KACZMAREK.

Court Ordered Motion is Granted.

Hearing on MOTION(#69) for Attorney Fees , Reimbursement of Expenses, and Approval of Incentive Awards by

MARNIE GLOVER, JAYME KACZMAREK.

Court Ordered Motion is Granted in Part; Denied in Part.

Hearing on MOTION(#98) to Intervene by Daniel Greenberg

Court Ordered Motion is Denied as Moot.

Hearing on Motion (#99) to strike by Daniel Greenberg

Court Ordered Motion is Denied as Moot.

Hearing on Motion (#100) for reconsideration by Daniel Greenberg

Court Ordered Motion is Denied as Moot.

Court read Opinion into the record.

Order to be submitted.

COMMENCED: 10:00 A.M. Jacqueline Gore

TIME ADJOURNED: 1:00 P.M. Deputy Clerk

TOTAL TIME: (3 hours)

Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 101 Filed 07/09/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1985
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

-vs- : CRIMINAL: 11-122(KSH)

Timothy Maurice Jenkins :

O R D E R

:

The financial inability of the defendant to retain counsel having been established by the 

Court, and the defendant not having waived the appointment of counsel,

It is on this 13 day of June 2011, th

O R D E R E D that Kevin Carlucci, Federal Public Defender for the District of New 

Jersey is hereby appointed to represent said defendant in this cause until further order of the 

Court.

/s/ Katharine S. Hayden

 

KATHARINE S. HAYDEN, U.S.D.J.

 

 

 

Case 2:11-cr-00122-KSH Document 9 Filed 06/15/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 26
 

 , U.S.D.J.

Case 2:11-cr-00122-KSH Document 9 Filed 06/15/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 27
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,John J. Lennon, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ofExplortex Energy Inc., (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge:

 
|   | (i)   | the  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the six months ended October 31,  2008 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |       |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|   | (ii)  | the  information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company.                                                                                                                |

 
|   | By:    |                         |
|--------|--------|------------------------------|
|   |   | */s/  John J. Lennon*        |
|   | Name:  | John  J. Lennon              |
|   |   |                         |
|   | Title: | Chief  Executive Officer and |
|   |   | Chief  Financial Officer     |
|   |   |                         |
|   | Date:  | December 12,  2008      |

 

----
Exhibit 10.13






Exhibit 10.13




DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 
FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS 
For each period between the annual meeting of shareholders, non-employee directors receive the following compensation: 
		
	n
	annual retainer - $75,000, payable at the director's election in shares of State Street common stock or in cash; 


		
	n
	meeting fees - $1,500 for each Board and committee meeting attended, together with reimbursement of expenses incurred as a result of attending such meetings, payable in cash; 


		
	n
	an annual common stock award in an amount equal to $130,000 divided by the closing price of the stock on May 16, 2012 (with additional stock amounts to reflect dividends if the award is deferred); 


		
	n
	a pro-rated annual retainer and annual common stock award for any director joining the Board prior to the 2013 annual meeting; 


		
	n
	an additional annual retainer for the Lead Director of $90,000, payable at the director's election in shares of State Street common stock or in cash; 


		
	n
	an additional annual retainer for the Examining and Audit Committee Chair and for the Risk and Capital Committee Chair of $25,000, payable at the director's election in shares of State Street common stock or in cash; 


		
	n
	an additional annual retainer for the Chairs of the Executive Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of $15,000, payable at the director's election in shares of State Street common stock or in cash; and 


		
	n
	an additional annual retainer for each member of the Examining and Audit Committee and for each member of the Risk and Capital Committee, other than the Chairs, of $10,000, payable at the director's election in shares of State Street common stock or in cash. 


Pursuant to State Street's Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, directors may elect to defer the receipt of 0% or 100% of their (1) retainers, (2) meeting fees, or (3) annual award of shares of common stock. Directors also may elect to receive all of their retainers in cash or shares of common stock. Directors who elect to defer the cash payment of their retainers and/or meeting fees may also make notional investment elections with respect to such deferrals, with a choice of one or more of five notional investment fund returns. To the extent the amounts are deferred, they will be paid (a) on the date elected by the director, either the date of the director's termination of service on the Board or a future date specified, and (b) in the form elected by the director as either a lump sum or in installments over a two- to ten-year period.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Donald Sharpe, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Coronado Corp. for
      the period ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Coronado Corp.                                                                 

Dated: May 13, 2011

| | /s/
      Donald Sharpe                                            
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Donald Sharpe                                                      
| | President and Director                                             
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer and
| | Principal Accounting Officer)                                      
| | Coronado Corp.                                                     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Coronado Corp.
and will be retained by Coronado Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### WOODS v. KORNFELD.

No. 3310.

United States District Court M. D. Pennsylvania.

Feb. 10, 1950.

*679See also 9 F.R.D. 196.

Cyril F. Pessolano, Chief, Rent Litigation Section, Joseph J. Strassman, Attorney, Office of the Housing Expediter, Philadelphia, Pa., Horace R. Cardoni, Attorney, Office of the Housing Expediter, Scranton, Pa., for plaintiff.

William Zacharellis (of Bialkowski, Bialkowski & Bialkowski), Scranton, Pa., for defendant.

WATSON, Chief Judge.

This is an action by the Housing Expediter alleging violations by the defendant, Louis Kornfeld, of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended,1 and the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended.2 The case is before the Court on a motion by defendant for discovery and production of documents and things for inspection, copying or photographing. In his motion defendant requests all written materials including correspondence filed with or sent to the plaintiff, his servants, agents, workmen or employees by certain named tenants, or by any other source whatsoever during a stated period, which, in any way, mention, or concern the defendant as landlord of said tenants, and all stenographic notes, with transcripts thereof, possessed by the plaintiff, his servants, agents, workmen or employees made during, or as a result of, telephone conversations or personal interviews, relating or referring to the defendant and the said tenants during a stated period.

It does not clearly appear from that which is now before the Court that the documents and things requested are material or relevant to the issues in the action. The relevancy should appear before such a motion is granted.3 Defendant’s motion will be denied without prejudice.

This case will be tried by the Court without a jury. The burden of proving the material allegations in the plaintiff’s Complaint will be upon the plaintiff. If, during the trial, it develops that the documents and things referred to in defendant’s motion for production are relevant to the subject matter involved in the action, the Court may then, if requested, properly consider the defendant’s motion as justice requires.

The action should be disposed of without further continuances or delays.

Now, the defendant’s motion for discovery and production of documents and things for inspection, copying or photographing is denied without prejudice.

1

. 56 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 901 et seq.

2

. 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 1881 et seq.

3

. Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.; Piorkowski v. Socony Vacuum Oil Co., D.C.M.D.Pa. 1940, 1 F.R.D. 407; Gill v. Col-Tex Refining Co., D.C.S.D.Tex.1940, 1 F.R.D. 255.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

CRIM. NO. ll-99(JLL)

v. ORDER

ANDREW COX

THIS MATTER having been opened to the Court by Pro Se

defendant, Andrew Cox, for an Order appointing stand-by counsel,

Michael N. Pedicini, Esq., as lead counsel for the purpose of

sentencing only and the Court having considered the matter and for

good and sufficient cause shown;

IT IS on this 7th day of AUGUST, 2012;

ORDERED that Michael N. Pedicini, Esq. is hereby appointed to

represent defendant, Andrew Cox for the purpose of sentencing only.

HONO,E/JOSE L. LINARES

UNIT,$TATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:11-cr-00099-CCC Document 127 Filed 08/08/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1397
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Splinternet Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                May 13, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                James C. AckerlyJames
                C. Ackerly, Chief Executive Officerand
                President (Principal Executive
                Officer)
1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SXC Health Solutions Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: November 5, 2009By:
    /s/ Mark ThiererMark ThiererChief Executive Officer
Exhibit10.31

June 15, 2005

John W.Henry & Company, Inc. 301 Yamato Road, Suite 2200 BocaRaton, Fl. 33431-4931

Attn: Mr. Ken Webster

Re:    Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Mr.Webster:

We are writing with respect to your managementagreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is madebelow (the "Management Agreements"). We areextending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2006and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remainunchanged.

|              |                               |
|--------------|-------------------------------|
| •  | Shearson Mid-West FuturesFund |

|              |                                                  |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| •  | Shearson Lehman Select AdvisorsFutures Fund L.P. |

|              |                                           |
|--------------|-------------------------------------------|
| •  | Smith Barney Mid-WestFutures Fund L.P. II |

|              |                                        |
|--------------|----------------------------------------|
| •  | Smith BarneyWestport Futures Fund L.P. |

|              |                                                |
|--------------|------------------------------------------------|
| •  | HuttonInvestors Futures Fund, L.P. II (HIFFII) |

|              |            |
|--------------|------------|
| •  | AURORA2001 |

|              |           |
|--------------|-----------|
| •  | AURORAIII |

|              |                                        |
|--------------|----------------------------------------|
| •  | Citigroup Diversified Futures FundL.P. |

|              |                                                        |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| •  | Salomon Smith Barney Diversified2000 Futures Fund L.P. |

|              |          |
|--------------|----------|
| •  | Alera100 |

|              |                                         |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------|
| •  | JWH Strategic Allocation MasterFund LLC |

Please acknowledge receipt of this modificationby signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention ofMr. Daniel McAuliffe at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. Ifyou have any questions I can be reached at 212-559-5043.

Very truly yours,

CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURESLLC

|           |                                                                                           |
|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:  | /s/ Daniel R.McAuliffe, Jr.Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr. Chief FinancialOfficer & Director |

JOHN W. HENRY &COMPANY, INC.

|           |                       |
|-----------|-----------------------|
| By:  | /s/Kenneth S. Webster |

PrintName:    Kenneth S. Webster

DRMcA/sr

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metals USA Holdings Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Periodic Report), I, Robert C. McPherson, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. To my knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the
Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                           
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 2, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    ROBERT C. MCPHERSON,
III                                           
|                        |  |  |  | Robert C. McPherson, III Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:11-cv-00625-JEI-JS Document 36 Filed 11/09/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 615
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 [Office Depot Letterhead] 
 February     , 2013

 [Name] 
 [Address] 

 

	 	Re:	Change in Control Agreement 

 Dear
                    : 
 Reference is
made to your Change in Control Agreement with Office Depot, Inc. (the “Company”), dated
                             (the “CIC Agreement”), and to the Agreement and Plan of
Merger by and among the Company, Dogwood Merger Sub Inc., Dogwood Merger Sub LLC, Mapleby Holdings Merger Corporation, Mapleby Merger Corporation and OfficeMax Incorporated, dated as of February 20, 2013 (the “Merger
Agreement”). 
 In connection with the signing of the Merger Agreement, the Company has agreed to amend your CIC Agreement to provide
for the following: 
 1) The occurrence of the “Closing”, as defined in the Merger Agreement, will be deemed to
constitute a “Change in Control” for purposes of your CIC Agreement. 
 2) In the event that you remain employed by the
Company through the date of the Closing, the “Employment Period” as defined in the CIC Agreement will be deemed to continue until the second anniversary of the Closing. 

3) In the event that (i) your employment with the Company is terminated without “Cause” or you terminate employment with
the Company for “Good Reason” (each, as defined in the CIC Agreement) prior to the Closing and (ii) the Closing subsequently occurs, then the provisions of Section 1(a) of the CIC Agreement shall apply and the “Effective
Date” for purposes of the CIC Agreement shall mean the date immediately prior to the date of your employment termination. 
 Except as
provided herein, the terms and provisions of your CIC Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 

Sincerely, 
 [Name] 
 [Title] 

Accepted and Agreed: 
  

 
 [Name]