alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### *In the matter of*Cyrus Chipman, *an absconding debtor.*

NEW YORK,

May, 1817.

An attachment; under *the ad for ren<f against "b-. TMs debtors,*may issue against the “®”’dsiS" <ia>t partnership, partnere'síe the state, an<5 üirested.

THIS was a motion for a *mandamus*to the recorder of the . , r 7 ,. . , . . city and county oí *Js cw-Yorlc.*directing him to issue a warrant ° . sentandabssond-oi attachment^ in pursuance of the act for giving relief against * o o o absconding and absent debtors. It appeared, that the usual proofs of the demand of the creditors, and of the absconding of the debtor, had been presented to the recorder, but that he had to issue the warrant, on the ground, that the demand was against *Chipman*and others, as copartners, and that two of the firm, of which *Chipman*was a member, remained within the *218state, liable to be arrested by ordinary process of law. It was however stated, that they were insolvent.

Griffin,

in behalf of the application, contended, that the act was to be beneficially expounded in favour of creditors ; that in case of a demand against a copartnership, each partner is to be considered a debtor for the whole amount, and that his person and property are liable therefor accordingly. That the statute in question authorizes the creditors to attach the property of any absconding or absent debtor, without limitation, and that the circumstance that such debtor has partners resident in this-state, can make no difference, especially, where such partners are insolvent. That, to engraft such a limitation on the construction of the statute, and to hold, that the presence of one, or more, of an indebted firm, would protect from arrest the property of those who had absconded, or were absent, might open a door to fraud and collusion. He cited *Crispe*v. *Peririt,*( Willes' *Rep.*467.) where it was held, that the creditor of a firm may, for such joint debt, take out a separate commission of bankruptcy against one of the partners; which case, as the counsel contended, was analogous in principle to the one under consideration.

*The Court*were of opinion, that an attachment might be taken out against the property of an absconding, or absent partner, for a debt due by the firm, although other partners belonging to the firm were resident within the state, and capable of being arrested; and they accordingly directed the *mandamus*to be issued.

Motion granted.
TSO10K2012-EX.10.35


Exhibit 10.35


2013 Incentive Compensation Program


On February 4, 2013, the Compensation Committee approved the terms of the 2013 Incentive Compensation Program (the “2013 ICP” or the “2013 Program”).  In addition, the Compensation Committee approved the target payouts for our Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers.  The 2013 Program consists of two equally weighted components: Corporate and Business Unit performance, which are outlined below.  The performance results of Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”) and the individual business units may be adjusted to take into account unbudgeted business decisions, unusual or non-recurring items, and other factors, as approved by the Compensation Committee, to determine the total amount, if any, available under the 2013 ICP.  The Compensation Committee also has discretion to adjust individual awards based on their assessment of an individual executive's performance relative to successful achievement of goals, business plan execution, and other leadership attributes.


Component 1 - Corporate Performance - weighted as 50% of total bonus opportunity measured against target with the range of outcomes between 0% to 200%. Corporate performance metrics include the following:


		
	•
	Achievement of Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”) measured on a margin neutral basis (this is the most heavily weighted metric, constituting 50% of the bonus opportunity for the corporate performance component)


		
	•
	Safety - Targeted improvement in recordable incidents


		
	•
	Process Safety Management - Targeted improvement in the number of process safety incidents


		
	•
	Environmental - Targeted improvement in the number of environmental incidents


		
	•
	Cost Management - Measurement of non-capital cash expenditure versus budget (this metric constitutes 35% of the bonus opportunity for the corporate performance component)




Component 2 - Business Unit Performance - weighted as 50% of total bonus opportunity measured against target with the range of outcomes between 0% to 200%. Business Unit performance is measured through balanced scorecards with performance metrics including, but not limited to:


		
	•
	Safety and Environmental


		
	•
	Cost Management


		
	•
	Improvements in EBITDA


		
	•
	Business improvement and value creation initiatives
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                        PHYSICIAN CORPORATION OF AMERICA
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


                                               YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                         1996           1995          1994
                                    --------------  -------------  -----------
Net (loss) earnings                 $(277,685,000)  $(24,596,000)  $52,547,000
                                    --------------  -------------  -----------
                                    --------------  -------------  -----------
Number of common shares and
 common share equivalents:
  Primary........................      38,757,660     39,969,520    40,474,615
                                    --------------  -------------  -----------
                                    --------------  -------------  -----------
  Fully diluted..................      38,757,660     39,969,520    40,528,878
                                    --------------  -------------  -----------
                                    --------------  -------------  -----------
Net (loss) earnings per common and
 common equivalent share.........         $(7.16)         $(0.62)        $1.30
                                    --------------  -------------  -----------
                                    --------------  -------------  -----------
Net (loss) earnings per common and
 common equivalent share assuming
 full dilution...................         $(7.16)         $(0.62)        $1.30
                                    --------------  -------------  -----------
                                    --------------  -------------  -----------
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Arbutus  Resources,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Karen
Law,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The  information  contained in the
Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
result of
              operations of the Company.
IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this  certification as of the
August 11, 2006.

/s/  Karen Law
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
H. Res. 87 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 30, 2019. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 790) to provide for a pay increase in 2019 for certain 

civilian employees of the Federal Government, and for other 

purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 

All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall 

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Oversight and Reform. After general debate the bill shall be 

considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The 

amendment printed in part A of the report of the Committee 

on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as 

adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole. 

The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points 

of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are 
2 

•HRES 87 EH 

waived. No further amendment to the bill, as amended, shall 

be in order except those printed in part B of the report of 

the Committee on Rules. Each such further amendment may 

be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be 

considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified 

in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent 

and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and 

shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question 

in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points 

of order against such further amendments are waived. At the 

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 

Committee shall rise and report the bill, as amended, to the 

House with such further amendments as may have been 

adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment 

thereto, to final passage without intervening motion except 

one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time through the legislative day of February 8, 2019, for the Speaker to entertain 

motions that the House suspend the rules as though under 

clause 1 of rule XV. The Speaker or her designee shall con-
3 

•HRES 87 EH 

sult with the Minority Leader or his designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this section. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-7111

PATRICIA L. AMBERMAN,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in 06-1160, Judge

William A. Moorman.

ON MOTION

Before PROST, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Patricia L. Amberman moves without opposition for a 33-day extension of time,

until February 17, 2009, to file her brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. No further extensions should be anticipated.

FOR THE COURT

FEB 2 2009

Date

cc:	Kenneth M. Carpenter, Esq.

L. Misha Preheim, Esq.

s20

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk	FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

FEB 0 2 2009

CLERK
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 968 

Recognizing the essential role of public safety telecommunicators in emergency 

response and the important work performed by public safety telecommunicators to protect the public and police, fire, and emergency medical 

officials during emergencies, such as the Coronavirus Disease 2019 

(COVID–19) pandemic. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2020 

Ms. ESHOO (for herself and Mr. SHIMKUS) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the essential role of public safety telecommunicators in emergency response and the important work performed by public safety telecommunicators to protect 

the public and police, fire, and emergency medical officials during emergencies, such as the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID–19) pandemic. 

Whereas public safety telecommunicators play a critical role 

in emergency response; 

Whereas the work performed by public safety telecommunicators goes far beyond merely relaying information between 

the public and first responders; 

Whereas, when responding to reports of missing, abducted, 

and sexually exploited children, the information obtained 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 968 IH 

and actions taken by public safety telecommunicators 

form the foundation for an effective response; 

Whereas the first contact that a hostage taker or a suicidal 

person makes when that person calls 9–1–1 is with a 

public safety telecommunicator, whose negotiation skills 

can prevent the situation from getting worse; 

Whereas, during active shooter incidents, public safety telecommunicators coach callers through first aid and give 

advice to prevent further harm, all while collecting vital 

information to provide situational awareness for responding officers; 

Whereas the work of public safety telecommunicators comes 

with an extreme emotional and physical impact that is 

compounded by long hours and the around-the-clock nature of the job; 

Whereas public safety telecommunicators should be recognized by all levels of government for the lifesaving and 

protective nature of the work that public safety telecommunicators perform; and 

Whereas major emergencies, such as the Coronavirus Disease 

2019 (COVID–19) pandemic, highlight the dedication of 

public safety telecommunicators and the important work 

performed by public safety telecommunicators to protect 

the public and police, fire, and emergency medical officials: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) honors and recognizes the important and 

3 lifesaving contributions of public safety telecommu4 nicators and other public safety communications 

5 professionals across the United States; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 968 IH 

1 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to remember the value of the work performed by 

3 public safety telecommunicators and other public 

4 safety communications professionals. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2010 PUBFLAG Addendum File

Consumer Expenditure Public-Use Microdata

November 29, 2011

Due to a processing error an incorrect value for the variable PUBFLAG was assigned for all observations 

of the UCC “520110”. The value on the released CD indicated that this UCC was “not published”, but 

should have indicated that it was “Published in integrated bulletin”. This will affect users that rely on 

this variable to combine Interview and Diary estimates in an integrated table or use the Integrated Mean 

and SE.sas sample program. 

No expenditure or income estimates were affected by the missing information.

The addendum file contains the correct values for the MTAB records in the original 2010 public-use 

microdata release (September 27, 2011). 

The addendum dataset includes the following variables:

Please refer to the Interview Data Dictionary provided on the CD or the website 

(http://www.bls.gov/cex/2010/csxintvwdata.pdf) for the definitions of these variables.

This dataset can be matched back to the originally released MTAB files file by matching on NEWID, UCC, 

SEQNO, and ALCNO. The new values for PUBFLAG should replace the old values for PUBFLAG. The 

addendum file only includes records that require updates. All other records in the original MTAB files 

file are correct. 

This addendum file has been made available in the following formats: SAS, SPSS, STATA, ASCII-commadelimited, and ASCII column parametered file type. Each format is under the name “PUBFLAGYYq.*” 

(*.sas7bdata, *.sav, *.dta, *.csv, *.txt)

If you have any questions or concerns regarding the addendum file, please contact us:

Phone – (202) 691- 6900

Email – cexinfo@bls.gov

We apologize for any inconvenience this has caused. 

Variable name Start 

Position

Format

NEWID 1 NUM(8)

UCC 9 CHAR(6)

SEQNO 15 NUM(3)

ALCNO 18 NUM(3)

PUBFLAG 21 CHAR(1)
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 28, 2015

No. 04-15-00026-CR

Reggie David VINE,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR3955

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The trial court imposed sentence on November 7, 2014; the appellant had thirty days to 

file a motion for new trial. See TEX. R. APP. P. 21.4(a); Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108, 109 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1993). Because the clerk’s record in this appeal does not show appellant 

timely filed a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on December 8, 2014. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). The appellant’s notice of appeal was filed with the trial court on 

January 9, 2015. 

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Olivo v. 

State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent a timely motion for new trial, a 

defendant’s notice of appeal is timely filed if filed within thirty days after (1) the day sentence is 

imposed or suspended in open court, or (2) the day the trial court enters an appealable order. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2; Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. In this case, the appellate record does not show 

that the appellant’s notice of appeal was timely filed.

A late notice of appeal may be considered timely so as to invoke a court of appeal’s 

jurisdiction if: 

(1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing; 

(2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen 

days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal; and 

(3) the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time. 
Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1991) (stating that an out-of-time appeal from a final felony conviction may be 

sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal 

Procedure). 

Therefore, we ORDER appellant to show cause in writing within fifteen days from the 

date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Olivo, 

918 S.W.2d at 522; Ater, 802 S.W.2d at 243.

All other appellate deadlines remain SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, John J. Lennon, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Explortex Energy Inc., (the “Company”),hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 
| (i)    |   | the Quarterly Report on  Form 10-Q of the Company for the nine months ended January 31, 2009  (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  as amended; and |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| (ii)   |   | the information contained  in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                   |

 

 
|   | By:    |                         |
|--------|--------|------------------------------|
|   |   | */s/ John  J. Lennon*        |
|   | Name:  | John J. Lennon               |
|   |   |                         |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer  and |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer      |
|   |   |                         |
|   | Date:  | March 13, 2009          |

 

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANASTASIA J. MAHONE, ESQ., as

Guardian ad Litem,

Appellant,

v.

NICHOLAS ANTHONY STREIT and

HANNAH PEKAR,

Appellees.

No. 4D2023-0879

[November 22, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Caryn Siperstein, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2021-DR003543-XXXX-MB. 

Meaghan K. Marro of Marro Law, P.A., Plantation, for appellant.

No answer brief filed for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, GERBER and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Case 3:11-cv-00890-MLC-LHG Document 35 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 258
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                              KOMAG, INCORPORATED

                     COMPUTATION OF INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                           Fiscal Year Ended (2)
                                    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        December 31, 1995               January 1, 1995         January 2,
                                    --------------------------   ---------------------------
                                     primary     fully diluted    primary      fully diluted     1994 (1)
                                    --------     -------------   --------      -------------    ----------
<S>                                 <C>          <C>             <C>           <C>              <C>
Weighted average shares of
    Common Stock outstanding          47,589           47,589      44,782             44,782       42,744
Weighted average shares of
    Common Stock equivalents:
       Stock Options                   2,316            2,284       1,212              1,592           --
                                    --------         --------     -------            -------      -------
Number of shares used in per
    share computation                 49,905           49,873      45,994             46,374       42,744
                                    ========         ========     =======            =======      =======

Net income (loss)                   $106,815         $106,815     $58,522            $58,522      $(9,901)
                                    ========         ========     =======            =======      =======

Net income (loss) per share            $2.14            $2.14       $1.27              $1.26       $(0.23)
                                    ========         ========     =======            =======      =======
</TABLE>


(1)    Common Stock equivalents related to stock options and warrants were not
       included in the computation of loss per share for the year ended January
       2, 1994 as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

(2)    The shares and earnings per share amounts have been restated to reflect
       the two-for-one stock split effective December 21, 1995.