alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1361 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 respecting the scoring 

of preventive health savings. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2019 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Mr. CRAPO, and Mr. KING) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 respecting 

the scoring of preventive health savings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SCORING OF PREVENTIVE HEALTH SAVINGS. 

4 Section 202 of the Congressional Budget and Im5 poundment Control Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 602) is amend6 ed by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(h) SCORING OF PREVENTIVE HEALTH SAVINGS.— 

8 ‘‘(1) DETERMINATION BY THE DIRECTOR.— 

9 Upon a request by the chairman or ranking minority 

10 member of the Committee on the Budget, the ComVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:40 May 15, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 \\ALPHA3\E\BILLS\S1361.IS S1361

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1361 IS

1 mittee on Finance, or the Committee on Health, 

2 Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate, or by 

3 the chairman or ranking minority member of the 

4 Committee on the Budget, the Committee on Energy 

5 and Commerce, or the Committee on Ways and 

6 Means of the House of Representatives, the Director 

7 shall determine if a proposed measure would result 

8 in reductions in budget outlays in budgetary out9 years through the use of preventive health and pre10 ventive health services. 

11 ‘‘(2) PROJECTIONS.—If the Director determines 

12 that a measure would result in substantial reduc13 tions in budget outlays as described in paragraph 

14 (1), the Director— 

15 ‘‘(A) shall include, in any projection pre16 pared by the Director, a description and esti17 mate of the reductions in budget outlays in the 

18 budgetary outyears and a description of the 

19 basis for such conclusions; and 

20 ‘‘(B) may prepare a budget projection that 

21 includes some or all of the budgetary outyears, 

22 notwithstanding the time periods for projections 

23 described in subsection (e) and sections 308, 

24 402, and 424. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 1361 IS

1 ‘‘(3) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this sub2 section— 

3 ‘‘(A) the term ‘budgetary outyears’ means 

4 the 2 consecutive 10-year periods beginning 

5 with the first fiscal year that is 10 years after 

6 the budget year provided for in the most re7 cently agreed to concurrent resolution on the 

8 budget; and 

9 ‘‘(B) the term ‘preventive health’ means an 

10 action that focuses on the health of the public, 

11 individuals, and defined populations in order to 

12 protect, promote, and maintain health and 

13 wellness and prevent disease, disability, and 

14 premature death that is demonstrated by cred15 ible and publicly available evidence from epide16 miological projection models, clinical trials, ob17 servational studies in humans, longitudinal 

18 studies, and meta-analysis.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

KENNETH W. ASHFORD, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

MICHAEL W. FLANNELLY, THOMAS R. 

PEREZ, A. TAYLOR WILLIAMS, 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 77 MM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.
Case 1:11-cv-00048-JHR-KMW Document 19 Filed 03/20/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 122
Case 1:11-cv-00048-JHR-KMW Document 19 Filed 03/20/12 Page 2 of 6 PageID: 123
Case 1:11-cv-00048-JHR-KMW Document 19 Filed 03/20/12 Page 3 of 6 PageID: 124
Case 1:11-cv-00048-JHR-KMW Document 19 Filed 03/20/12 Page 4 of 6 PageID: 125
Case 1:11-cv-00048-JHR-KMW Document 19 Filed 03/20/12 Page 5 of 6 PageID: 126
Case 1:11-cv-00048-JHR-KMW Document 19 Filed 03/20/12 Page 6 of 6 PageID: 127
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby gives notice that members of its staff may attend the meeting noted below. Their attendance is part of the Commission's ongoing outreach efforts. ICT Stakeholder Policy Committee Meeting July 23, 2009 (8 a.m.-2 p.m.),  Sheraton New Orleans,  500 Canal Street,  New Orleans, LA 70130,  504-525-2500. The discussions may address matters at issue in the following proceedings: Docket No. OA07-32
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. OA08-59
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. OA08-61
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. OA08-75
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. OA08-92
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. OA08-149
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. EL00-66
Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. EL01-88
Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. EL05-15
Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Entergy Arkansas, Inc.Docket No. EL07-52
Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. EL08-59
ConocoPhillips v. Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. EL08-60
Union Electric v. Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. EL09-35
Cottonwood Energy LLP v. Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. EL09-43
Arkansas Public Service Commission v. Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. EL09-61
Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. ER03-583
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. ER05-1065
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. ER07-682
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. ER07-956
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. ER07-985
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. ER08-513
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. ER08-515
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. ER08-767
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. ER08-774
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. ER08-1056
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. ER08-1057
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. ER09-555
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. ER09-636
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. ER09-659
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. ER09-833
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. ER09-877
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. ER09-878
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. ER09-882
Entergy Services, Inc.Docket No. ER09-985
Entergy Services, Inc.
 
 
 These meetings are open to the public. For more information, contact Patrick Clarey, Office of Energy Market Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (317) 249-5937 or 
                    *patrick.clarey@ferc.gov.* Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.


[FR Doc. E9-16258 Filed 7-8-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 131 (Friday, July 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16357]



[[Page 33204]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Florida Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a meeting of the 
Florida Advisory Committee (Committee) to the Commission will convene 
on Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 1:30 p.m. and adjourn at approximately 
3:30 p.m. at Brevard Community College, Carver Administration Building 
2, Room 161, 1519 Clearlake Road, Cocoa, Florida. The purpose of the 
meeting is to discuss the Committee's report on fair housing 
enforcement. Members of the public are entitled to submit written 
comments. The comments must be received in the regional office by 
August 28, 2009. The address is U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 61 
Forsyth St., SW., Suite 18T40, Atlanta, GA 30303. Persons wishing to e-
mail their comments, or to present their comments verbally at the 
meeting, or who desire additional information should contact Peter 
Minarik, Regional Director, Southern Regional Office, at (404) 562-7000 
or 800-877-8339 for individuals who are deaf, hearing impaired, and/or 
have speech disabilities or by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#97e7fafef9f6e5fefcd7e2e4f4f4e5b9f0f8e1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8afae7e3e4ebf8e3e1cafff9e9e9f8a4ede5fc">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Southern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Southern Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, July 7, 2009.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. E9-16357 Filed 7-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

125 BROAD STREET, 39TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10004-2400

www.sedgwicklaw.com 212.422.0202 phone 212.422.09 25 fax

Daniel Meier

(212) 898-4016

daniel.meier@sdma.com

NY/852966v1

April 19, 2012

Via ECF and Regular Mail

Honorable Faith S. Hochberg, U.S.D.J.

United States District Court

District of New Jersey 

Martin Luther King, Jr. Federal Building & 

U.S. Courthouse

50 Walnut Street

Newark, NJ 07101

Re: James Wright v. Hartford Financial Services Group, et al.

 Civil Action No.: 2:11-CV-00602-SRC-MAS

 SDMA File No.: 02489-000119

Dear Judge Hochberg:

This office represents the Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Hartford”) 

in the above-referenced matter. We are writing to inform the Court that pursuant to Your Honor’s Order 

dated April 12, 2012, (Doc. No. 66), we will be submitting a Supplemental Reply Rule 56.1 Statement of 

Material Facts based on Plaintiff James Wright’s (“Wright”) “Response to Defendant’s Statement of 

Material Facts Pursuant to R. 56.1,” which was filed on April 17, 2012. (Doc. No. 69). Your Honor’s Order 

did not set a deadline by which Hartford should file its Supplemental Reply and thus, we respectfully request

that the Court allow Hartford two weeks from today’s date to respond to the Plaintiff’s responsive 

statement of material facts. 

Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

Respectfully submitted,

s/

Daniel Meier 

Sedgwick LLP

cc: Attorney of Record for the Plaintiff (via ECF)

Case 2:11-cv-00602-FSH-MAH Document 70 Filed 04/19/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 2009
#### In the Matter of John R. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Charles M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Phillip R. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Charles M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[851 NYS2d 891]

*545The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion of the appellant, a “person legally responsible for the child’s care” (Family Ct Act § 1042), to vacate the fact-finding order entered upon his default in appearing at the fact-finding hearing, as the record showed that he “willfully refused to appear at the hearing” *(id.; see Matter of Nicholas S.,*46 AD3d 830 [2007]; *Matter of W. Children,*256 AD2d 412, 413 [1998]; *Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Margaret D.,*221 AD2d 439 [1995]). Moreover, the appellant failed to set forth a meritorious defense to the allegations in the petition *(see*Family Ct Act § 1042). Fisher, J.P., Dillon, McCarthy and Belen, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Splinternet Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of the undersigned’s knowledge, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 except that the financial statements included in
this Report have not been reviewed by an independent public accountant as
required by Regulation S-X; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November
      23, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      John T. GrippoJohn
      T. Grippo, Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2714

AZELLA COCHRAN, Executor of the Estate of

Willie Stratford,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CSX TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED; JAMES LEE

POOLE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-93-2594-3-17BC)

Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Azella Cochran, Appellant Pro Se. William Parham Simpson, Steven

Todd Moon, Boyd Benjamin Nicholson, Jr., HAYNSWORTH, MARION, MCKAY

& GUERARD, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

her wrongful death action as barred by the applicable statute of

limitations. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. Cochran v. CSX Transportation, Inc., No.

CA-93-2594-3-17BC (D.S.C. Aug. 17, 1995). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vampt America, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2012 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vampt America, Inc. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  November 19, 2012 |   |                                                                                    |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                |   | /s/ Ian Toews                                                                           |   |
|                                |   | Ian Toews                                                                               |   |
|                                |   | Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director(Principal Executive Officer) |   |
|                                |   | Vampt America, Inc.                                                                     |   |
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 131 (Friday, July 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16323]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID USAF-2009-0042]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Air Force proposes to delete a system of 
records to its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act 
of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
August 10, 2009 unless comments are received which result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Air Force Privacy Act Officer, Office 
of Warfighting Integration and Chief Information Officer, SAF/XCPPI, 
1800 Air Force Pentagon, Suite 220, Washington, DC 20330-1800.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ben Swilley at (703) 696-6648.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of the Air Force systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the address above.
    The Department of the Air Force proposes to delete one system of 
records notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion 
is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 
(5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or 
altered system report.

    Dated: July 7, 2009.
Morgan E. Frazier,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
F061 AFMC A

System Name:
    Aeromedical Research Data (11 June 1997, 62 FR 31793).

Reason:
    The system is no longer in use.

[FR Doc. E9-16323 Filed 7-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Exhibit 31.3
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GLG Partners, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Jeffrey M. RojekJeffrey M. RojekChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of GigaMedia Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Stringer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2012



By:

/s/ John R. StringerJohn R. StringerChief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 26, 2016

jam 

# Order

Clerk February 26, 2016

1 53230 ( 20 )

In re FIELDS

__________________________________

CEDRIC FIELDS

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 1 53230

COA: 328777

WAYNE CIRCUIT COURT

,

Defendant

- Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be

liable for filing fees.

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall p ay to the

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $ 2 7.00, shall submit a copy of this order

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of

$3 4 8.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full.

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.