alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Keith R. Phillips, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Wellman, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financialreporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.        Date  March 25, 2008 By:  /s/Keith R. Phillips    Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harry Murphy, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 637]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Rockland County (Resnik, J.), entered January 24, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant’s history of drug and alcohol abuse and other *779factors that were not contested by him, which resulted in 110 points on the risk assessment form, was a sufficient basis to designate him a level three sex offender *(see People v Abdullah,*31 AD3d 515 [2006]).

His contention that he was improperly assessed additional points based upon uncertified copies of certain depositions need not be addressed since there was a sufficient basis to designate him a level three sex offender without those depositions *(see People v Lombard,*30 AD3d 573 [2006]). Adams, J.E, Goldstein, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.
PROS 12*

(7193)

United States District Court

for

District of New Jersey

Report on Offender Under Supervision

Name of Offender: Issac Muldrow Cr.: 11-101-001

PACTS #: 60650

Name of Sentencing Judicial Officer: Jose L. Linares

Date of Original Sentence: 01/10/12

Original Offense: Possession of a weapon by convicted felon

Original Sentence: 3 months imprisonment; 3 years supervised release

Type of Supervision: Supervised Release Date Supervision Commenced: 4/23/12

NONCOMPLIANCE SUMMARY

The offender has not complied with the following condition(s) ofsupervision:

Violation Number Nature of Noncompliance

1 On May 18 and 24, 2012, Muldrow tested positive for marijuana. On July 11,

2012, Muldrow admitted to smoking marijuana on July 4, 2012.

U.S. Probation Officer Action:

We recommend that Muldrow participate in and complete Moral Reconation Therapy (MRT), which is a workshop

facilitated by the probation office. MRT is a systematic, cognitive-behavioral, step-by-step treatment program that

has resulted in significantly lower levels of rearrests and reincarcerations in participants by recognizing and

changing negative and criminal thinking patterns. IfYour Honor agrees with our plan, the probation office will also

present a copy ofthis order to the offender as a formal written reprimand. We will advise the Court of any additional

noncompliance.

Respectfully submitted,

Maureen

By: Amy J. Capozzolo Kelly

U.S. Probation Officer

Date: 07/12/12

The Court’s endorsement ofthis petition will serve as an official written reprimand to the offender unless the

Court directs that additional action be taken asfollows:

[ ] Submit a Request for Modifying the Conditions or Term of Supervision

[ ] Submit a Request for Warrant or Summons

[ ] Other

ofJudicial Officer

Case 2:11-cr-00101-JLL Document 20 Filed 07/18/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 52
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 
No.  11

                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                           National Datacomputer, Inc.
          Statement recomputation of net income (loss) per common share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        December 31,       December 31,
                                                                            1998               1997
                                                                        ------------        ------------

<S>                                                                     <C>                <C>         
Net loss, as reported                                                   $  (421,188)       $(1,212,566)

Preferred stock preference items:

Warrant                                                                 $  (214,000)                --

Discount inherent in conversion terms of Series C                       $   (25,958)       $  (146,308)
           convertible preferred stock upon issuance

Discount inherent in conversion terms of Series D                       $   (20,644)       $  (116,354)
           convertible preferred stock upon issuance


Discount inherent in conversion terms of Series E
           convertible preferred stock upon issuance                    $   (75,000)                --

Discount inherent in conversion terms of Series F                       $   (18,750)                --
           convertible preferred stock upon issuance

Interest on Series B, C, D and F convertible preferred stock            $  (413,625)       $  (404,750)
                                                                        ------------        ------------

Total preferred stock preference item                                   $  (767,977)       $  (667,412)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders                            $(1,189,165)       $(1,879,978)

Weighted average shares outstanding:

A. Shares attributable to common stock outstanding                        1,798,580          1,343,876
B. Shares attributable to convertible preferred stock outstanding                --                 --
C. Shares attributable to common stock options and warrants
           pursuant to APB 15, paragraph 38 (a)                                  --                 --
                                                                        ------------        ------------

Weighted average shares outstanding                                       1,798,226          1,343,876
                                                                        ============        ============

Net loss  per share                                                     $     (0.66)       $     (1.40)
                                                                        ============        ============
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regal  Rock,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2006 as filed  with  the  Securities
and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

   1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Date:   January 29, 2007


/s/ Wu Chih Chun
---------------------------------------
Wu Chih Chun, Principal Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-4899

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TERRELL QUANTE LEDBETTER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:05-cr-00246) Submitted: August 31, 2007 Decided: October 3, 2007 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sandra J. Barrett, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, Amy E. Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Terrell Quante Ledbetter pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base and was sentenced to 210 months of imprisonment. On appeal, Ledbettter alleges that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance for failing to argue at sentencing previously filed objections to his presentence report. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are not cognizable on direct appeal, unless the record conclusively establishes ineffective assistance. United States v. James , 337 F.3d 387, 391 (4th Cir. 2003); United States v. Richardson , 195 F.3d 192, 198 (4th Cir. 1999). Rather, to allow for adequate development of the record, claims of ineffective a ssistance generally should be brought in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. United States v. Hoyle , 33 F.3d 415, 418 (4th Cir. 1994). We find that ineffective assistance of counsel is not conclusively established on the record before us. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1265 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1265

 To amend the Oil Region National Heritage Area Act to reauthorize the 
       Oil Region National Heritage Area, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 2019

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Oil Region National Heritage Area Act to reauthorize the 
       Oil Region National Heritage Area, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Oil Region National Heritage Area 
Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. OIL REGION NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA ACT.

    (a) Sunset.--Section 608 of the Oil Region National Heritage Area 
Act (Public Law 108-447; 118 Stat. 3372) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 608. SUNSET.

    ``The authority of the Secretary to grant or provide any assistance 
under this title shall terminate on September 30, 2026.''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 612(a)(2) of the Oil 
Region National Heritage Area Act (Public Law 108-447; 118 Stat. 3373) 
is amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting ``$20,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Monarch Financial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their
knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ William F. Rountree, Jr.                        
|William F. Rountree, Jr.,                           
|President & Chief Executive Officer                 
|                                                    
|/s/ Brad E. Schwartz.                               
|Brad E. Schwartz                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                    
|Date: August 7, 2009
JOY MASON as the A ini5t1L. ofthe

Estate of OERJvflNE FORRESTER, and

JOY MASON, individually ORDER GRANTING STAY aud

s4DMISTRATVJ TERMINATION

P1&indff Cf flAction#2;II-CV-ll7(SRC)(MAS)

JOHN DTNEEN ROBERT DINEEN Sr.,

and MAY RYAN, LLC., doing business as

MICHAEL ANTHONY’S RESTAURANT

DefcndardL

— — x

For good cause shown ra this day ofAugust 2011,

ORDERED that this metier is hereby stayed pending a linal outcome ofDefendant JOHN

DINEEN’s criminal proceeding pending in the County ofBudecu, State ofNew Jersey either

through pies or tiial; and

It is ftnher ORDERED that tlClerk edmlnistratively terminate thIs action In the

records ofthis COuit, without prejudice to the right ofthe ptiesto reopen the proceedings upon

letter application to the then presiding Magistrate Judge;

It is further ORDERED that any statute of limitations defense resulting solely from the

swalved and
can be the acdv dock

Adam .Ser,Esq.

Attorney for Pialitiff

EBANKS & SADTLER LLP

20 V*ey Street Sutc 503

New York, NY 10007Themes Mthewa

Atlorney forJohzi Dinecn and

Robett Dlnami

SORIANO, HE?JKEL at a

75 Eisenhower ParkwayRoseland, NJ 07068

Attorney for May Ryan, LLC

MALOOP, LEBOWITZ. et aL

127 MaIn Street

Chathmn, NJ 07928

y

p

has 

bern resolved through pica or trial, the C

se

Honorable MichLA,.4b1Pf

UFaateJud
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

SUSAN JACOBSON, et al., : Civil Action No. 11-1160 (AET) 

:

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. : AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

:

SYNTHES, INC., et al., : 

:

Defendants. :

_________________________________________ :

 

This matter having come before the Court during a telephone status 

conference on August 7, 2012; and the Court having conferred with counsel concerning the

status of expert discovery; and good cause appearing for the entry of the within Order;

IT IS on this 7 day of August 2012, th

ORDERED THAT:

1. Based on extenuating circumstances, the time within which Plaintiffs may

serve copies of any affirmative expert disclosures and reports is further extended to August

28, 2012.

2. Defendants shall serve copies of any rebuttal expert disclosures and reports

by September 28, 2012.

3. Expert depositions must be completed by November 5, 2012.

4. No expert shall testify at the time of trial as to any opinions, nor base those

opinions on facts, not substantially disclosed in any report as described in the preceding

paragraphs.

5. The Court will conduct telephone status conferences on September 11, 2012

at 3:00 P.M., and on November 8, 2012 at 2:00 P.M. Defendants’ counsel will initiate these

calls.

6. Any dispositive motions must be filed by November 26, 2012.

7. The Court may, from time to time, schedule conferences as may be required,

either on its own motion or at the request of counsel. Failure to appear at subsequent

conferences, or to comply with any of the terms of this Order, may result in sanctions.

Case 3:11-cv-01160-AET-DEA Document 24 Filed 08/07/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 109
8. Since all dates set forth herein are established with the assistance and

knowledge of counsel, there will be no further extensions except for good cause shown and by

leave of the Court, even with consent of all counsel.

s/ Douglas E. Arpert 

DOUGLAS E. ARPERT

United States Magistrate Judge

ALL PROPOSED ORDERS AND LETTER MEMORANDA SENT TO CHAMBERS

SHOULD BE IN WORDPERFECT FORMAT AND E-MAILED TO:

dea_orders@njd.uscourts.gov. ANY FILINGS WITH THE CLERK’S OFFICE SHOULD BE

IN PDF FORMAT.

Case 3:11-cv-01160-AET-DEA Document 24 Filed 08/07/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 110
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Joseph A. Mills, Chief Executive Officer of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC, the general partner of Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P., the general partner of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. (the Partnership), hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



|                  |  |                                                   
|----------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 9, 2008 |  | /s/ Joseph A. Mills                               
|                  |  | Joseph A. Mills                                   
|                  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Eagle Rock
|                  |  | Energy G&P, LLC, General Partner of Eagle Rock    
|                  |  | Energy GP, L.P., General Partner of Eagle Rock    
|                  |  | Energy Partners, L.P.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Randolph Gress, certify that:

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innophos Holdings, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided Innophos Holdings, Inc. and will be retained
by Innophos Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned
expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: May 7, 2010



/S/ RANDOLPH GRESSRandolph Gress
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed
as a part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.