alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 4917

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To amend title 5, United States Code, to authorize appropriations for the Administrative Conference of the United States for fiscal years 2005, 2006, and 2007, and

for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Regulatory Improvement

Act of 2004’’.

SEC. 2. PURPOSES.

(a) PURPOSES.—Section 591 of title 5, United States Code, is

amended to read as follows:

‘‘§ 591. Purposes

‘‘The purposes of this subchapter are—

‘‘(1) to provide suitable arrangements through which Federal agencies, assisted by outside experts, may cooperatively

study mutual problems, exchange information, and develop recommendations for action by proper authorities to the end that

private rights may be fully protected and regulatory activities

and other Federal responsibilities may be carried out expeditiously in the public interest;

‘‘(2) to promote more effective public participation and efficiency in the rulemaking process;

‘‘(3) to reduce unnecessary litigation in the regulatory

process;

‘‘(4) to improve the use of science in the regulatory process;

and

‘‘(5) to improve the effectiveness of laws applicable to the

regulatory process.’’.

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Title 5 of the United States

Code is amended—

(1) in section 594 by striking ‘‘purpose’’ and inserting ‘‘purposes’’; and

(2) in the table of sections of chapter 5 of part I by

amending the item relating to section 591 to read as follows:

‘‘591. Purposes’’.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

Section 596 of title 5, United States Code, is amended to

read as follows:
H. R. 4917—2

‘‘§ 596. Authorization of appropriations

‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this

subchapter not more than $3,000,000 for fiscal year 2005,

$3,100,000 for fiscal year 2006, and $3,200,000 for fiscal year 2007.

Of any amounts appropriated under this section, not more than

$2,500 may be made available in each fiscal year for official representation and entertainment expenses for foreign dignitaries.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4957 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4957

 To ensure an appropriate balance between resources and accountability 
              under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2004

   Mr. John introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure an appropriate balance between resources and accountability 
              under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keeping Our Education Promise to 
America's Children Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. DEFERRAL OF FEDERAL MANDATES IF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FAILS TO 
              MAKE MINIMUM APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) Deferral of Certain Requirements.--Section 1116 of the 
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6316) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Deferral.--No school or local educational agency may be 
identified for or subject to the requirements of school improvement, 
corrective action, or restructuring under this section for any school 
year for which the amounts appropriated for the corresponding fiscal 
year for the purpose of carrying out this part are less than 97 percent 
of the following:
            ``(1) $20,500,000,000 for fiscal year 2005.
            ``(2) $22,750,000,000 for fiscal year 2006.
            ``(3) $25,000,000,000 for fiscal year 2007.''.
    (b) Deferral of Requirements for Teachers and Paraprofessionals.--
Section 1119 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 
U.S.C. 6319) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(m) Deferral.--A State educational agency may defer the 
commencement, suspend the implementation, or modify but not cease the 
development, of the requirements of this section (for the State 
educational agency and local educational agencies within the State) for 
1 school year for each fiscal year for which the amounts appropriated 
to carry out subparts 1 through 4 of part A of title II are less than 
97 percent of the following:
            ``(1) $3,016,000,000 for fiscal year 2005.
            ``(2) $3,076,000,000 for fiscal year 2006.
            ``(3) $3,143,000,000 for fiscal year 2007.''.
                                 <all>
```
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Donald Sharpe, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Coronado Corp. for
      the period ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Coronado Corp.                                                                

Dated: August 16, 2010

| | /s/
      Donald Sharpe      
| | -----------------------------
| | Donald Sharpe                
| | President                    
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
| | Coronado Corp.               

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Coronado Corp.
and will be retained by Coronado Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

PREMIER HEALTH CENTER, P.C., et al.,

Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 11-425 (ES)

v. O R D E R 

UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, et al.,

Defendants.

This matter having come before the Court on a Motion for Reconsideration, submitted by 

Defendants, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(i), of the Court’s December 2, 2013 ruling denying 

summary judgment against Judson G. Sprandel, as a named plaintiff of the ONET Repayment 

Demand Class; and a Motion, submitted by Plaintiffs, to certify the ONET Repayment Demand 

Class, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23; and the Court having considered the 

submissions of the parties; and for the reasons set forth in the Opinion of even date;

IT IS on this 28th day of August, 2014, ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for 

Reconsideration is GRANTED. Dr. Sprandel cannot serve as a named Plaintiff of the ONET 

Repayment Demand Class. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify the ONET Repayment Demand Class is 

GRANTED, subject to Plaintiffs’ providing evidence that named plaintiffs BHSC and/or Tri3

seeks an ERISA claim against one or more active, unresolved overpayment demands that fit

within the definition of the ONET Repayment Demand Class.

Case 2:11-cv-00425-ES-JAD Document 309 Filed 08/28/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 11958
2

_/s/ Dickinson R. Debevoise__________ 

DICKINSON R. DEBEVOISE, U.S.S.D.J.

Case 2:11-cv-00425-ES-JAD Document 309 Filed 08/28/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 11959
#### BRUNSWICK-BALKE-COLLENDER CO. v. AMERICAN BOWLING & BILLIARD CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Jan. 5, 1943.

*479Kenyon & Kenyon, of New York City (Harry W. Lindsey, Jr., of Chicago, 111., and Theodore S. Kenyon, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Gluck & Breitenfeld, of New York City (Samuel E. Darby, Jr. and William S. Gluck, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant. .

COXE, District Judge.

These are motions by the plaintiff (1) to dismiss the Third separate defense of the amended answer, and (2) for a bill of particulars of various allegations of the Second and Third counterclaims of the amended answer.

The motion to dismiss the Third separate defense is denied. I think this defense is sufficient under the Morton Salt case, Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co., 314 U.S. 488, 62 S.Ct. 402, 86 L.Ed. 363; as now pleaded, it meets the objection sustained by Judge Goddard with respect to a similar defense in the former pleading. 2 F.R.D. 487.

The motion for a bill of particulars as to various allegations of the Second and Thiid counterclaims is also denied. I think these allegations are made with sufficient definiteness or particularity. That is all that the rule requires, and any further information needed to enable the plaintiff properly to prepare for trial may readily be obtained by means of interrogatories or in an examination before, trial. It is apparent, also, that the case is peculiarly one in which a full utilization of the pre-trial procedure would not only do away with much unnecessary and burdensome paper work, but at the same time give the plaintiff definite and binding assurance as to the particular kind of evidence it will be required to meet at the trial.
Case 2:11-cv-00427-JLL -MAH   Document 14    Filed 05/02/11   Page 1 of 10 PageID: 75

Case 2:11-cv-00427-JLL -MAH   Document 14    Filed 05/02/11   Page 2 of 10 PageID: 76

Case 2:11-cv-00427-JLL -MAH   Document 14    Filed 05/02/11   Page 3 of 10 PageID: 77

Case 2:11-cv-00427-JLL -MAH   Document 14    Filed 05/02/11   Page 4 of 10 PageID: 78

Case 2:11-cv-00427-JLL -MAH   Document 14    Filed 05/02/11   Page 5 of 10 PageID: 79

Case 2:11-cv-00427-JLL -MAH   Document 14    Filed 05/02/11   Page 6 of 10 PageID: 80

Case 2:11-cv-00427-JLL -MAH   Document 14    Filed 05/02/11   Page 7 of 10 PageID: 81

Case 2:11-cv-00427-JLL -MAH   Document 14    Filed 05/02/11   Page 8 of 10 PageID: 82

Case 2:11-cv-00427-JLL -MAH   Document 14    Filed 05/02/11   Page 9 of 10 PageID: 83

Case 2:11-cv-00427-JLL -MAH   Document 14    Filed 05/02/11   Page 10 of 10 PageID: 84
SCWC-20-0000473

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

JOHNNY ETIMANI,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-20-0000473; CASE NO. 1CPC-17-0001446)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s Application for Writ 

of Certiorari, filed on May 5, 2022, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, June 1, 2022.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-20-0000473

01-JUN-2022

09:00 AM

Dkt. 3 ODAC
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,216-04

IN RE RIGGIN VALLEY, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. CR017 IN THE 42ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM COLEMAN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus under this

Court’s original jurisdiction. He contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in

Coleman County and his application has not been properly forwarded to this Court.

Respondent, the District Clerk of Coleman County, shall forward Relator’s habeas

application to this Court, respond that Relator has not filed a habeas application in Coleman County,

or forward a copy of an order designating issues together with correspondence documenting the date

the State received Relator’s habeas application. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(c) and

(d); TEX.R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(5). This motion for leave to file will be held. Respondent shall comply

with this order within thirty days from the date of this order.
2

Filed: March 9, 2022

Do not publish
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: May 12, 2016 517189

________________________________ In the Matter of FREDDIE JACKSON, Appellant, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADMINISTRATION OF BARE HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al., Respondents.

________________________________ Calendar Date: March 29, 2016 Before: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Clark and Aarons, JJ.

__________ Freddie Jackson, Malone, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Laura Etlinger of counsel), for respondents.

__________ Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McDonough, J.), entered July 10, 2013 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition. Petitioner, an inmate, filed a grievance with the Inmate Grievance Resolution Committee challenging his removal from the facility mess hall work program. The Committee denied the grievance, as did the facility Superintendent on appeal. Subsequently, petitioner submitted a letter to respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision seeking reinstatement to the mess hall program. Petitioner did not, however, appeal the denial of his grievance to the Central Office Review Committee (hereinafter CORC). He thereafter commenced-2- 517189

this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the disposition of his grievance. Supreme Court granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition based upon petitioner's failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and he now appeals. We affirm. Petitioner's removal from the program was the proper subject of the inmate grievance procedure, requiring that he follow the protocol of the administrative appeal procedure by appealing the Superintendent's denial to CORC (see 7 NYCRR 701.3; 701.5; Matter of Fulton v Reynolds, 83 AD3d 1308, 1308-1309 [2011]). Inasmuch as petitioner failed to appeal to CORC, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies (see Matter of Fulton v Reynolds, 83 AD3d at 1308-1309; Matter of Fernandez v Goord, 53 AD3d 961, 961-962 [2008]). McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
II 

Calendar No. 95 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1321 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit interference with voting 

systems under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 6, 2019 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself, Mr. GRAHAM, and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

MAY 22, 2019 

Reported by Mr. GRAHAM, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit interference with voting systems under the Computer Fraud 

and Abuse Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defending the Integ5 rity of Voting Systems Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1321 RS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON INTERFERENCE WITH VOTING 

2 SYSTEMS. 

3 Section 1030(e) of title 18, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (2)— 

6 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or’’ 

7 at the end; 

8 (B) in subparagraph (B), by adding ‘‘or’’ 

9 at the end; and 

10 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(C) that— 

12 ‘‘(i) is part of a voting system; and 

13 ‘‘(ii)(I) is used for the management, 

14 support, or administration of a Federal 

15 election; or 

16 ‘‘(II) has moved in or otherwise af17 fects interstate or foreign commerce;’’; 

18 (2) in paragraph (11), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

19 end; 

20 (3) in paragraph (12), by striking the period 

21 and inserting a semicolon; and 

22 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

23 ‘‘(13) the term ‘Federal election’ means any 

24 election (as defined in section 301(1) of the Federal 

25 Election Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 

26 30101(1))) for Federal office (as defined in section 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1321 RS

1 301(3) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 

2 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30101(3))); and 

3 ‘‘(14) the term ‘voting system’ has the meaning 

4 given the term in section 301(b) of the Help Amer5 ica Vote Act of 2002 (52 U.S.C. 21081(b)).’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 95 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1321 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit 

puter Fraud and Abuse Act. interference with voting systems under the ComMAY 22, 2019 

Reported without amendment 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 of the Company
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 14, 2008
    /s/ RYUJI UENORyuji Ueno, M.D., Ph.D., Ph.D.Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 125 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to repeal the forfeiture rule for 

peanuts under the nonrecourse marketing assistance loan program, prohibit the use of Federal funds for certain activities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 15, 2019 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO (for herself and Mr. LEE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to repeal the forfeiture rule for peanuts under the nonrecourse marketing 

assistance loan program, prohibit the use of Federal 

funds for certain activities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Removing Excessive 

5 Dollars to Uproot and Cut Expensive Government Waste 

6 Act’’ or the ‘‘REDUCE Government Waste Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 125 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SPECIAL RULE FOR PEANUTS. 

2 Section 1201 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 

3 U.S.C. 9031) is amended by striking subsection (e). 

4 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR DEVELOP5 MENT OF BEERBOTS. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Fed7 eral funds may be used for the development of a beerbot 

8 or other robot bartender. 

9 SEC. 4. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR DEVELOP10 MENT OF INSECT-BASED FOODS. 

11 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Fed12 eral funds may be used for the development of insect13 based foods for human consumption, including cricket 

14 farming and taste-testing of insect-based foods. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alejandro Aparicio, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Star Resorts
      Development Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Star Resorts Development Inc..                                                               

Date: August 13, 2008



| | /s/ Alejandro
    Aparicio           
| | -------------------------------------
| | Alejandro
      Aparicio             
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
| | Principal Executive Officer          



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Star Resorts
Development Inc. and will be retained by Star Resorts Development Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Exploration
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 29, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Warren Robb, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



*/s/ Warren Robb*

Warren RobbChief Executive Officer 
  April 16, 2008

---