alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1223 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for the nonapplication of Medicare competitive acquisition rates to complex rehabilitative wheelchairs and accessories. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 29, 2019 

Mr. CASEY (for himself and Mr. PORTMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for the non-application of Medicare competitive acquisition rates to complex rehabilitative wheelchairs and accessories. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Beneficiary 

5 Access to Complex Rehab Technology Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1223 IS

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFYING NON-APPLICATION OF MEDICARE 

2 COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION RATES TO COM3 PLEX REHABILITATIVE WHEELCHAIRS AND 

4 ACCESSORIES. 

5 Section 1834(a)(1)(F) of the Social Security Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 1395m(a)(1)(F)) is amended— 

7 (1) in clause (ii), by striking at the end ‘‘and’’; 

8 (2) in clause (iii), by striking at the end the pe9 riod and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

11 clause: 

12 ‘‘(iv) in the case of covered items fur13 nished on or after July 1, 2019, the Sec14 retary shall not apply this subparagraph or 

15 any other provision of this title to use in16 formation from the competitive acquisition 

17 program to determine payment amounts 

18 for items excluded from such competitive 

19 acquisition program, including all complex 

20 rehabilitative manual and power wheel21 chairs classified by the Secretary as of 

22 January 1, 2015, and, without limitation, 

23 any wheelchair accessory, cushion, or back 

24 when furnished in connection with a comVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:43 Apr 30, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1223.IS S1223

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 1223 IS

1 plex rehabilitative manual or power wheel2 chair.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tianyin Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, James Jiayuan Tong, Chief Financial Officer & Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.








Date: August 22, 2011








/s/    James Jiayuan TongJames Jiayuan TongChief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer,Chief Business and Development Officer, Director
Case 2:11-cr-00102-JLL Document 12 Filed 08/23/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 40
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Northeast Mortgage  Corporation
on Form  10-KSB for the  period  ending  December  31,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Brian
Rogerson, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Brian Rogerson
Brian Rogerson
President
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 13, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---

32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Alejandro Aparicio, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Star Resorts Development Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Star
      Resorts Development Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 (the
      "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of Star Resorts Development
  Inc..                                                                    

Dated: February 14, 2008

| | /s/ Alejandro Aparicio                     
| | -------------------------------------------
| | Alejandro
      Aparicio                   
| | President and Chief
      Executive Officer
| | (Principal Executive
      Officer)        
| | Star Resorts
      Development Inc.        

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Star Resorts Development Inc. and will be retained by Star Resorts
Development Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
#### Carol Koehler, Appellant-Respondent, v Sei Young Choi, Respondent-Appellant, and Family Services, Inc., Respondent.

[854 NYS2d 726]

*505The defendant Family Services, Inc. (hereinafter Family Services), served the plaintiff, pursuant to CPLR 3216, with a 90-day notice dated October 17, 2006, which the plaintiff received on October 18, 2006. The defendant Sei Young Choi did not serve his own 90-day notice. After the 90-day period for serving and filing a note of issue had expired, Family Services and Sei Young Choi separately moved, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 3216 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them. In response, the plaintiff cross-moved to extend her time to serve and file a note of issue. The Supreme Court granted Family Services’s motion but, among other things, denied that branch of Choi’s motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3216 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him. The court granted the plaintiffs cross motion to extend the time to serve and file a note of issue.

The plaintiff failed to file a note of issue or to move, before the default date, to vacate the 90-day notice or to extend the 90-day period for service and filing of a note of issue. She failed to demonstrate either a justifiable excuse for the delay in complying with the 90-day notice or a meritorious cause of action insofar as asserted against Family Services—the party which served the notice (see CPLR 3216 [e]; *Baczkowski v Collins Constr. Co.,*89 NY2d 499 [1997]; *Zito v Jastremski,*35 AD3d 458 [2006]). The plaintiffs only excuse, that discovery had not been completed, was insufficient, since she failed to adequately explain her own neglect in complying with her outstanding discovery obligations (see *Levin v Levin,*256 AD2d 447, 448 [1998]; *Olshansky v Lutheran Med. Ctr.,*211 AD2d 772, 773 [1995]). Furthermore, the conclusory allegations contained in the verified complaint and the plaintiffs affidavit were insufficient to show a meritorious cause of action insofar as asserted against Family Services (see *Lugauer v Forest City Ratner Co.,*44 AD3d 829, 830 [2007]; *Carnegie v J.P. Phillips, Inc.,*28 AD3d 599, 600 [2006]). Accordingly, under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the motion of Family Services to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it for failure to prosecute, upon finding that the plaintiff failed to comply with the 90-day notice.

Since Choi did not serve his own 90-day notice, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of his separate motion which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him for the plaintiffs failure to comply with the 90-day notice served by Family Services (see CPLR 3216 [b] [3]; *Walters v Hoboken Wood*
      *506
      *Flooring Corp.,*6 AD3d 696, 697 [2004]; *Cohen v Silverman,*281 AD2d 445, 446-447 [2001]; *Ubriaco v Mather Mem. Hosp.,*209 AD2d 404 [1994]).

The parties’ remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.P., Fisher, Florio, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
Xr. Cay Guetsl* pzteet, Do Hereby verify that
the foaccoing Stotement and alle aon in the

Lega | SCUMENL Gee to the bes} of ny row ledae
isdeue and Correct pursuant do 2 US.C. secHon 1146.

Sigue ov “The J" Day OF Daly , 2016

Auten  eecd2b

Lill Clemo, Uy!

Féal our SY

Chravills, be M407

p,-f-


$3, e4t4-Ol
ie “Ut The CourT OF Crimina| Cppea ls OF “Texas
TH
Expaere “Thiel Court » B10
Garay Geeen D-I:D¢-12-202798
Perit TioNE R ccEIVED IN
VS. COURT CF CRIMINAL APPEALS
Disteicy Clerk (Travis Counity) ‘JUL 23 2015
ResponiclenT ' Abel Acosta, Clerk

“ETI Tio For wri T OF Matdamus

WiTh QNAEX MoYioal For EXTEAsion
OF Time

x.
The O Sed a Appealed His ComvicTion OPTER beial

Lonivie ed ig The SapT Crimina | DisTRICT. Court 0
YE

Ravis Ca EXGS, Thus ippea lin 1 The 137 Court
OF Cppea |. “helen Deoker # (3- rating CR yal which

GkFiamed Cope! Hlanis ConvieTion Ox Mey 8, 2015,

“Therect Ter The Gh Gppellan Te Otocwe of Pieced ON. -_
aubmitted on Shel Fp éllanT behalf to this Court a
Motion For EeTENSIon OF Tena To submit POR PETIT:

For Discretionary feview. Pork SE

Ly addition y the said Tudealed Motion was Filed and
Thereafter SulosequeslTly eanted in This particu lar Court
and the (PDR)I3 Now let be File by Quaust 2%, 20/5,

houte The less, Me waited! Correspondent Pwarded 4o the

Cope llowt by the OHoeey Of Retond on appeal Nowe ly
glen Sen AN, Paled Mla 25,2015, ‘athieales wheecas

the Appel lanrt has the Right te proceed Pro SE Gaicl
P,|-



Pict CPDR ) PRET Tion For Discretionary Review, Thus indeed
bein, apart of the appeal process 45 which the Pre sé
alsovhas the Right te “he provided with the Complete aia |

draft his petition . Moneso,

Record int ordeR 3, adequate \y

the Cope llaatt has attempted’ with due diligence iN ORdER +a

Dbloid’ the trial Record iA) said: cause * D-1-DC- 12-20 2798
hus by way of Correspondent with the District Cleats

Th
Of ice at Thavis Count y Exas. and in Addi +FioN y has alse

submitled a Most RECEN+ Motion for production of tric |
Records to the 390 Distaict Court at Travis Count
Thus beina G REGSonable time 296, and Still Mo RESPONSE,

Nolicé
The Gppellaut has a deadline 40 mee+ b
Lluqus4 2, Sos, onc With out the much Needed “ia -
RECORIS, Said Oppellant Cannot suPbiciently submit his

litiaation! by the Expired date There fone Tne ve Nhat
beiwe the pro se lidigaut. is compelled to REQuest GN
addition | (0) Day tension to submit hisCPDR) wheréas
the Oppel aac iS MERE ly only a layman - at - law aud Mot
a trained Citoaey - ad! low, ond eeds.adeguate amount

Of Time to Review the trial Record and alse RESEarc

Rélevand case -law. Thus Providing that the Cppetlant is allowe.
5,

do Review the Relevant Ria | REC

HL.
Furdhermore, the Oopellant steks an ORderR Leon this high -
Gourd Thus Comoelli 1a, dhe Distaiet Clerk for Teevis County
Texas to provide and thake available the Complete raiad

Record wae | , The Statement OF The Facts y aay and a
onoduced iat this

Motions , Quid ‘or Transcript submitted and
particu lag Cause D-j-DC-12-20279@, Thus at whieh the

P:2-


Ww

Oppllout is Etitle to at this stege of the proceedings
DEA Prosecuting the appeal PDR “pro sé.
“Respectfully
Cary Laceyt
Lppellant

P-3-
911 A.2d 46

#### IN THE MATTER OF MARY NANCY FLANAGAN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

November 29, 2006.

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed with the Court a petition pursuant to *Rule*1:20-11(a) and *Rule*1:20-3(g)(4) for the immediate temporary suspension of MARY NANCY FLANAGAN of HACKETTSTOWN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990;

And MARY NANCY FLANAGAN having failed to appear on the Order to Show Cause issued in this matter;

And good cause appearing;

*541It is ORDERED that MARY NANCY FLANAGAN is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that MARY NANCY FLANAGAN be removed as a signatory to any and all attorney accounts maintained in any New Jersey financial institution pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6; and it is further

ORDERED that MARY NANCY FLANAGAN be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of her suspension and that she comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00340-CV

In re Jose P. Garza, District Attorney, Travis County, Texas

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied, and the motion to expedite is 

dismissed as moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith

Filed: August 31, 2023
--------·~-- .. --------

Order entered October /g , 2012 

In The 

QCourt of ~peal~ 

jf iftb m i~tritt of t!Cexa~ at mana~ 

No. 05-12-00211-CR 

CHRISTEN MITCHELL, Appellant 

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F10-61101-U 

ORDER 

On September 19, 2012, this Court ordered court reporter Peri Wood to file, within 

fifteen days, a supplemental record containing State's Exhibit nos. 7 and 11, DVDs. To date, 

Ms. Wood has neither filed the supplemental record containing the exhibits nor communicated 

with the Court regarding the status of the supplemental record. 

Accordingly, this Court ORDERS Peri Wood, official court reporter of the 291st Judicial 

District Court, to file, within SEVEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental record 

containing State's Exhibit nos. 7 and 11, DVDs. The exhibits shall be filed in the proper MP3 or 

MP4 format. No further extensions will be granted. If we do not receive the supplemental 

record with the time specified, we will order that Peri Wood not sit as a court reporter until she 

has filed the exhibits in this appeal. 
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

following: 

• Honorable Susan Hawk, Presiding Judge, 291 st Judicial District Court; 

• Peri Wood, Official Court Reporter, 291st Judicial District Court; and 

• Counsel for all parties. 

DAVID 

cJ-<-~· L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
Case 3:11-cv-01160-AET -DEA Document 17 Filed 03/13/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 96
Case 1:11-cv-01471-RBK-JS Document 4 Filed 03/16/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 196
Case 1:11-cv-01471-RBK-JS Document 4 Filed 03/16/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 197
Exhibit 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, William F. Rountree, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Monarch Financial Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                  |  |  |  |                                     |  | 
|----------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: May 8, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ William F. Rountree, Jr.        |  | 
|                  |  |  |  | William F. Rountree, Jr.            |  | 
|                  |  |  |  | President & Chief Executive Officer |  | 



23
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November      17, 2009 | By:    | /s/      Wu, Man Shing                                                                          |   |
|------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   |   | Wu,      Man Shing                                                                                   |   |
|                   |   | Interim      Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          25,916
<SECURITIES>                                    43,610
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,664
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,180
<INVENTORY>                                     23,018
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               136,874
<PP&E>                                         820,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                 506,658
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 475,871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          338,755
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           659
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   475,871
<SALES>                                        331,946
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               331,946
<CGS>                                          354,655
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  354,655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               268,380
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (400)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,319
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (307,667)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,192
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (310,049)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (310,049)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.98)


</TABLE>
Case 1:11-cr-00136-RMB Document 6 Filed 05/17/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 8