alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MedPro Safety Products, Inc. (the “Company”) for the annual period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Marc T. Ray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)      | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and    |
|--------|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                    |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)                     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                     | MEDPRO SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. |
|--------------------------|------------------------------|
|                     |                         |   |
| Dated: November 14, 2008 | By:                          | /s/ Marc T. Ray |
|                     |                         | Chief Financial Officer |

33

----
^1-15

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA #14-14-00348-CR OFFENSE: Poss of a Controlled Substance

STYLE: Wade Timothv Bessard v The State of Texas COUNTY: Harris

COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed th TRIAL COURT: 1841" District Court

DATE: March 17. 2015 Publish: Yes TC CASE #: 1221855

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STYLE: Wade Timothv Bessard v The State of Texas

CCA #

ftPPjZLL AAJ7""" ^ Petition CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

DATE: OblWlL

JUDGE: 2^L

JUDGE:

SIGNED:.

PUBLISH:

HH^IS

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000812075
<NAME> UNO RESTAURANT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                           2,030
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,784
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,296
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,925
<PP&E>                                         193,866
<DEPRECIATION>                                  68,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 143,195
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,280
<BONDS>                                         47,246
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,531<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   143,195
<SALES>                                        191,276
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               191,276
<CGS>                                           48,567
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  178,624
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   134
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,527
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,991
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,968
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          636
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,387
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49
<FN>
<F1>Net of Treasury Stock
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32





Allegiant Travel Company Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act - filed as an exhibit to 10-Q for Quarter Ended March 31, 2011





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO





18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allegiant Travel Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Maurice J. Gallagher, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Scott Sheldon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Maurice J. Gallagher, Jr.

/s/ Scott SheldonMaurice J. Gallagher, Jr.

Scott SheldonPrincipal Executive Officer

Principal Financial OfficerMay 10, 2011

May 10, 2011





The foregoing Certification shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this report into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
#### Michelle Delayhaye et al., Respondents, v Caledonia Limo & Car Service, Inc., et al., Appellants, and Nakia Trent Griffin et al., Respondents.

[856 NYS2d 142]

“A rear-end collision with a stopped or stopping vehicle creates a prima facie case of negligence with respect to the operator of the moving vehicle and imposes a duty on that operator to rebut the inference of negligence by providing a non-negligent explanation for the collision” *(Ahmad v Grimaldi,*40 AD3d 786 [2007]; *see Russ v Investech Sec.,*6 AD3d 602 [2004]). Here, the defendants Caledonia Limo & Car Service, Inc., and Lincoln O. Phillips (hereinafter the defendants) established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability by showing that the vehicle of the codefendants Nakia Griffin and Yaneen Griffin struck the rear of their stopped vehicle. However, in opposition, the codefendants rebutted the prima facie showing by adducing evidence that the defendants’ vehicle suddenly and without warning stopped in the lane of traffic without adequate explanation (see *Brodie v Global Asset Recovery, Inc.,*12 AD3d 390 [2004]; *Moran v Singh, 10*AD3d 707, 708 [2004]; *Purcell v Axelsen,*286 AD2d 379, 380-381 [2001]; *Colonna v Suarez,*278 AD2d 355 [2000]; *Maschka v Newman,*262 AD2d 615 [1999]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, in effect, dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them. Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Covello, McCarthy and Chambers, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         208,731
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,653,921
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (108,602)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,298,979
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,800
<PP&E>                                       1,550,013
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,290,501)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,372,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,476,405
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,797,613
<COMMON>                                       130,267
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,299,434)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,372,341
<SALES>                                      4,644,903
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,812,778
<CGS>                                        3,264,805
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,264,805
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,649,201
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             124,596
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,212,566)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,212,566)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,212,566)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1


OFFICERS’
CERTIFICATIONS


Certification
of Chief Executive Officer







Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Douglas Emmett, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby
certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:






(i)
            the
      accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
      ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and






(ii)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Date:  November
      5, 2009
            By:
            /s/
      JORDAN L. KAPLANJordan
      L. KaplanPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0242

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOURNEY RYDER JOHN WIENKE,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Mike Menahan , D istrict Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 20 2022

04/20/2022
Case Number: DA 20-0242
Lopezes it

mot- M£4ajt yd
John b- Rodarte SrT.D.CJ.I 1263270

Clements Unit

9601 Spur 591

Amarillo,Texas 79107-9606

■AMARILLO XX 7^1

21 JUL 2O15 PIM

-:

•.. ft

303J?
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                           Subsidiaries of Registrant

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
           Subsidiary                                 Jurisdiction of Organization
           ----------                                 ----------------------------
<S>                                                  <C>
Healthcare Staffing Solutions, Inc.                  Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Health Tour Management, Inc.                         State of Delaware

RehabCare Group Therapy Services, Inc.               State of Missouri

RehabCare Group East, Inc.                           State of Delaware

RehabCare Group Management Services, Inc.            State of Delaware

RehabCare Group of California, Inc.                  State of Delaware

RehabCare Texas Holdings, Inc.                       State of Delaware

RehabCare Group of Texas, L.P.                       State of Texas

StarMed Management, L.L.C.                           State of Delaware

StarMed Health Personnel, Inc.                       State of Delaware

Wesley Medical Resources, Inc.                       State of California

eai Healthcare Staffing Solutions, Inc.              State of Delaware

Salt Lake Physical Therapy Associates, Inc.          State of Utah

AllStaff, Inc.                                       State of Iowa

Therapeutic Systems, Ltd.                            State of Illinois

DiversiCare Rehab Services, Inc.                     State of Kentucky

Orthopaedic Specialties, LLC                         State of Kentucky
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

District of New Jersey

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR.

FEDERAL BUILDING & U.S. COURTHOUSE

50 WALNUT ST., ROOM 5054

P.O. Box 999

Newark, NJ 07101-0999

973-645-6042

June, 2012

Andrew Cox Jane Yoon

ECCF J201 107038 Office of the U.S. Attorney

354 Doremus Avenue District ofNew Jersey

Newark, NJ 07105 970 Broad Street, Suite 700

Newark, NJ 07102

Michael N. Pedicini

60 Washington Street

Morristown, NJ 07960

LETTER ORDER

Re: United States v. Cox

Criminal No.: 11-99

Dear Messrs. Cox and Counsel:

The Court has received Defendant Andrew Cox (“Defendant”)’ s request for an extension

to file his response to the Government’s opposition to his pending motion to withdraw his guilty

plea from June 19, 2012 to June 28, 2012. The Government has consented to Defendant’s

request for an extension.

IT IS accordingly on this2 day ofJune, 2012,

ORDERED that Defendant may submit his reply to the Government’s opposition to his

motion to withdraw his guilty plea no later than June 28, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CHAMBERS OF

JOSE L. LINARES

JUDGE

L. Linares

United States District Judge
Case 2:11-cr-00051-SDW Document 22 Filed 08/18/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 49
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Physician Corporation of America

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements No. 
33-48153, No. 33-65174 and No. 33-98406 on Form S-8 of Physician Corporation 
of America of our report dated April ___, 1997, relating to the consolidated 
balance sheets of Physician Corporation of America and subsidiaries as of 
December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the related consolidated statements of 
operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the 
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, which report appear in 
the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of Physician Corporation of 
America.


                                         KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Miami, Florida
April ___, 1997
S. 134 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To amend title 18, United States Code, with regard to stalking. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Combat Online Predators Act’’. 

SEC. 2. ENHANCED PENALTY FOR STALKERS OF CHILDREN. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 110A of title 18, United States Code, 

is amended by inserting after section 2261A the following: 

‘‘§ 2261B. Enhanced penalty for stalkers of children 

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection (b), if the 

victim of an offense under section 2261A is under the age of 18 

years, the maximum imprisonment for the offense is 5 years greater 

than the maximum term of imprisonment otherwise provided for 

that offense in section 2261. 

‘‘(b) LIMITATION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to a person 

who violates section 2261A if— 

‘‘(1) the person is subject to a sentence under section 

2261(b)(5); and 

‘‘(2)(A) the person is under the age of 18 at the time 

the offense occurred; or 

‘‘(B) the victim of the offense is not less than 15 nor 

more than 17 years of age and not more than 3 years younger 

than the person who committed the offense at the time the 

offense occurred.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 110A of title 18, United States Code, is amended 

by inserting after the item relating to section 2261A the following 

new item: 

‘‘2261B. Enhanced penalty for stalkers of children.’’. 

(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2261A of title 18, 

United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘section 2261(b) of 

this title’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2261(b) or section 2261B, as the 

case may be’’. 

SEC. 3. REPORT ON BEST PRACTICES REGARDING ENFORCEMENT OF 

ANTI-STALKING LAWS. 

Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the Attorney General shall submit a report to Congress, which 

shall— 
S. 134—2 

(1) include an evaluation of Federal, Tribal, State, and 

local efforts to enforce laws relating to stalking; and 

(2) identify and describe those elements of such efforts 

that constitute the best practices for the enforcement of such 

laws. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 27, 2019

No. 04-19-00476-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.R.R., A CHILD

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-05-24951-CV

Honorable Cathy Morris, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights which 

must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. TEX.

R.JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. 

The reporter’s record was originally due to be filed in this appeal on July 22, 2019. On 

July 19, 2019, the court reporter responsible for preparing the record notified this court that she 

had not received payment for the record. On July 22, 2019, this court ordered appellant to 

provide written proof to this court that either (1) the reporter’s fee had been paid or arrangements 

had been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the 

reporter’s fee. Our order stated that if appellant failed to respond within the time provided, 

appellant’s brief would be due within twenty days of the date of the order, and the court would 

consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s 

record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

On August 21, 2019, the attorney who was retained to represent appellant at trial filed a 

motion to withdraw. The motion stated good cause existed for the withdrawal based on 

communication issues and appellant’s representation that she intended to retain new counsel for 

the appeal. By order dated August 27, 2019, we abated this appeal to the trial court for a ruling 

on the motion to withdraw.

On September 5, 2019, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed containing an order 

signed by an associate judge denying the motion to withdraw. Appellant’s attorney requested a 

de novo review. On September 27, 2019, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed containing the 

trial court’s order adopting a prior order granting a motion to withdraw filed by the same 

attorney. It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal is REINSTATED on the docket of this court. 

Based on the trial court’s orders, appellant is proceeding pro se or without representation by an 

attorney.
Appellant is ordered to provide written proof to this court within ten (10) days of the date 

of this order that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to 

pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. If 

appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due within twenty 

days from the date of this order, and the court will consider only those issues or points raised in 

appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

37.3(c).

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of September, 2019.

___________________________________

Luz Estrada,

Chief Deputy Clerk
Case 3:11-cv-00597-JAP-LHG   Document 38   Filed 01/15/13   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 661

Case 3:11-cv-00597-JAP-LHG   Document 38   Filed 01/15/13   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 662
Case 1:11-cv-01182-NLH -AMD Document 1 Filed 03/02/11 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 1
Case 1:11-cv-01182-NLH -AMD Document 1 Filed 03/02/11 Page 2 of 18 PageID: 2
Case 1:11-cv-01182-NLH -AMD Document 1 Filed 03/02/11 Page 3 of 18 PageID: 3
Case 1:11-cv-01182-NLH -AMD Document 1 Filed 03/02/11 Page 4 of 18 PageID: 4
Case 1:11-cv-01182-NLH -AMD Document 1 Filed 03/02/11 Page 5 of 18 PageID: 5
Case 1:11-cv-01182-NLH -AMD Document 1 Filed 03/02/11 Page 6 of 18 PageID: 6
Case 1:11-cv-01182-NLH -AMD Document 1 Filed 03/02/11 Page 7 of 18 PageID: 7
Case 1:11-cv-01182-NLH -AMD Document 1 Filed 03/02/11 Page 8 of 18 PageID: 8
Case 1:11-cv-01182-NLH -AMD Document 1 Filed 03/02/11 Page 9 of 18 PageID: 9
Case 1:11-cv-01182-NLH -AMD Document 1 Filed 03/02/11 Page 10 of 18 PageID: 10
Case 1:11-cv-01182-NLH -AMD Document 1 Filed 03/02/11 Page 11 of 18 PageID: 11
Case 1:11-cv-01182-NLH -AMD Document 1 Filed 03/02/11 Page 12 of 18 PageID: 12
Case 1:11-cv-01182-NLH -AMD Document 1 Filed 03/02/11 Page 13 of 18 PageID: 13
Case 1:11-cv-01182-NLH -AMD Document 1 Filed 03/02/11 Page 14 of 18 PageID: 14
Case 1:11-cv-01182-NLH -AMD Document 1 Filed 03/02/11 Page 15 of 18 PageID: 15
Case 1:11-cv-01182-NLH -AMD Document 1 Filed 03/02/11 Page 16 of 18 PageID: 16
Case 1:11-cv-01182-NLH -AMD Document 1 Filed 03/02/11 Page 17 of 18 PageID: 17
Case 1:11-cv-01182-NLH -AMD Document 1 Filed 03/02/11 Page 18 of 18 PageID: 18
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131396 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131396 

 COA: 265861 

Wayne CC: 97-008523

DARRIN COATS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 4, 2006 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
Case 2:10-cv-03319-KM-JBC Document 83 Filed 07/28/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1037
Case 2:10-cv-03319-KM-JBC Document 83 Filed 07/28/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1038