alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Thomas M. Duff, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Wellman, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or  (b) caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be  (c) designed under our supervision, to ensure that  (d) material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;Designed such internal control over financialreporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; andDisclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of  b) internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;andAny fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.        Date April 29, 2008 By:  /s/ Thomas M. Duff    Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Bernmanette Florez, Respondent, v Ali Cameron, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 771]

Application by appellant’s assigned counsel to withdraw is granted *(see Matter of Louise Wise Servs. [Whyte],*131 AD2d 306 [1987]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Gonzalez, Buckley and Acosta, JJ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andre Jordan, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 443]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J.), rendered on or about July 22, 2005, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Friedman, Gonzalez, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
TDCJ Offender Details Page 1 of2 

60,loS3-o~ 

m iittil:t.Jmg Iii New Offender Search 

Offender Information Details 

Return to Search list 

SID Number: 

TDCJ Number: 

Name: 

Race: 

Gender:. 

DOB: 

Maximum Sentence Date: 

Current Facility: 

Projected Release Date: 

Parole Eligibility Date: 

Offender Visitation Eligible: 

04538355 

01905515 

PORTER,ORVIS WAYNE 

B 

M 

1974-04-24 

2020-12-19 

PACK I 

2020-12-19 

2012-02-16 

YES 

Information provided is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times per day 

on visitation days. Because this information is subject to change, family members and 

friends are encouraged to call the unit prior to traveling for a visit. 

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEIDULED RELEASE: 

Scheduled Release Date: Offender is not scheduled· for release at this time. 

Scheduled Release Type: Will be determined when release date is scheduled. 

Scheduled Release Location: 

, , Parole Review Information . 

Offense History: 

Offense 

Date 

i 

Offense 

I 

Will be determined when release date is scheduled. 

Se~~~~ce County Case No. 

I I I 

Sentence (YYMM-DD) 

http://offender.tdcj.texas.gov/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=04538355 7/28/2015
PM-EX10.24_12.31.12-Q4




EXHIBIT 10.24










MERIT INCREASE STATEMENT FOR EXPATRIATES


Pellegrini Mateo 


Philip Morris International










2012 MERIT INCREASE – EFFECTIVE 1 APRIL 2012






Current Annual Base Salary    :                CHF 910,092.00
Merit Increase            :                3.29 %
New Annual Base Salary    :                CHF 940,008.00
Comparatio/Position in Range :                22.0 %












Your new salary will be implemented together with the April 2012 payroll.




















Since 2008, all expatriates have one unique Merit review date in April. If this is the first time you are part of the Expat Merit cycle and your home merit review date differs from April, your merit increase already includes the necessary prorated adjustment.
**EXHIBIT
      32** **.1**




**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**









Richard
      D. Bailey, in the capacity of the officer who performs the functions of
      Principal Executive Officer of Conihasset Capital Partners, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the “Registrant”), certifies that:




1.
      The
      Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
      2006 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.


/s/Richard
                D. BaileyRichard
                D. BaileyChief
                Executive Officer




Date:
      November 14, 2006


36
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of California Gold Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2011,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James D. Davidson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of June 14, 2011.





/s/ James D. DavidsonJames D. DavidsonChief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to California Gold Corp., and will be retained by California Gold Corp., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Archon Corporation (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| |  | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: December 23, 2003



|/s/ Paul W. Lowden                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Paul W. Lowden Chairman of the Board and President (Principal Executive Officer)



|/s/ Charles W. Sandefur                                                                              
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Charles W. Sandefur Director and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

I, John C. Kleinert, Chief Executive Officer of Velocity Asset Management, Inc.
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

     1.  this Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the
         Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully
         complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.  the information contained in the Amendment fairly represents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date:    June 15, 2007

         BY:  /s/ JOHN C. KLEINERT
              ------------------------------
              John C. Kleinert
              Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate
disclosure document.


                                       7
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1384

YOLANDA E. JIMENEZ-VENTURA; A. P. Q. J.,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: October 29, 2019 Decided: January 16, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, HARRIS, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael E. Rosado, LAW OFFICES OF ROSADO & SOLTREN, P.C., Beltsville, 

Maryland, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Margaret Kuehne 

Taylor, Senior Litigation Counsel, Rodolfo D. Saenz, Office of Immigration Litigation,

Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for 

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Yolanda E. Jimenez-Ventura and her minor child, natives and citizens of El 

Salvador, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) 

dismissing their appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying their motion to 

reopen and rescind their in absentia removal order. We have reviewed the administrative 

record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1003.23(b) (2019). We therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by 

the Board. See In re Jimenez-Ventura (B.I.A. Mar. 12, 2019). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
909 A.2d 1131

#### IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS A. GIAMANCO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

November 21, 2006.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-214, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to *Rule*1:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that THOMAS A. GIAMANCO of RIDGEWOOD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating *RPC*1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation of client funds), *RPC*1.15(d) (recordkeeping violations), and *RPC*8.1(b) (failure to file answer to complaint and to comply with agreement in lieu of discipline), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS A. GIAMANCO is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*l:20-20(c), respondent’s failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of *Rule*1:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent’s petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of *RPC*8.1(b) and *RPC*8.4(c); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to *Rule*1:10-2; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual *495expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Joseph Carusone, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that

|1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Striker Energy Corp.
      for the interim period ended August 31, 2010, fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Striker Energy Corp.                                                                     

October 8, 2010

| | /s/ Joseph Carusone                                     
| | --------------------------------------------------------
| | Joseph Carusone                                         
| | President, Chief Executive
      Officer Chief Financial
| | Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and
      Director        
| | (Principal Executive Officer,
      Principal Financial 
| | Officer and Principal Accounting
      Officer)         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Striker Energy
Corp. and will be retained by Striker Energy Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 32.1


                                 CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regal  Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2010, as filed  with  the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"), I, ERIC WILDSTEIN,
President,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Director  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to {section}906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
<S> <C> <C>
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in  all  material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of the Company.
<S> <C> <C>
</TABLE>



Date:  July 12, 2010


/s/ Eric Wildstein
ERIC WILDSTEIN
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEPHEN RALEY,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

BOB WILLIAMS; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 19

- 16561

D.C. No. 2:14

- cv

- 02652

- JAM

DMC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 9 , 2020 * *

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Stephen Raley appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law claims arising out of a

citation and fine imposed on him for growing marijuana. We have ju risdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal for failure

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 16 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 16561

to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)

. Sheppard v. David Evans and

Assoc. , 694 F.3d 1045, 1048 (9 th Cir. 2012). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Raley’s due process, equal protection,

and excessive fines claims because Raley failed to allege facts sufficient to state a

plausible claim

. See Austin v. Univ. of Or. , 925 F.3d 1133, 1139 (9 th Cir. 2019)

( requiremen ts for procedural due process claim ); Towery v. Brewer , 672 F.3d 650,

660 (9 th Cir. 2012) ( class

- of

- one doctrine of equal protection does not apply to

state action that involves discretionary decisionmaking based on subjective,

individualized assessments) ; see also United States v. Bajakajian , 524 U.S. 321,

33 4 (1998) (a fine is unconstitutional ly excessive under the Eighth Amendment if

its amount is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense)

.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to exercise

supplemental jurisdiction over Raley’s state law claims. See 28 U.S .C.

§ 1367(c)(3); Ove v. Gwinn , 264 F.3d 817, 826 (9 th Cir. 2001) (court may decline

supplemental jurisdiction over related state law claims once it has dismissed all

claims over which it has original jurisdiction).

We do not consider matters not specific ally and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
#### James Grimes *vs.*The Mayor, &c., of Jersey City.

In the case of the same prosecutor against James Grimes, the charge is precisely the same as in the case just decided. A single witness was examined, and testified much as in the other case, but failed to sustain the particular charge brought against the defendant, and on which he was tried.

It is said that this defendant admitted this charge. It is true he was charged by the officer with “ violating the Sunday laws,” and made some admission to this effect; this, however, may be done in various ways, but he was not charged with *exposing intoxicating liquors for sale on the Sabbath,*and made no such admission.

I think, therefore, in this case also, that the charge not having been sufficiently or legally sustained by the evidence, no legal conviction can follow, and that the judgment of the recorder should be reversed.