alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. §1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Capital Resources, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Christopher Larson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Steve Staehr,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Act of 1934; and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
                Christopher LarsonChristopher
                LarsonChief
                Executive OfficerAugust
                14, 2008/s/
                Steve StaehrSteve
                StaehrChief
                Financial OfficerAugust
                14, 2008
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cecilio Daley, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 469]

Appeals by the defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Braun, J.), all rendered May 16, 2005, convicting him of assault in the second degree under indictment No. 1404/04, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 10489/04, and reckless endangerment in the first degree under superior court information No. 2661/04, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s *932assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeals. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [19673; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Miller, J.E, Santucci, Goldstein, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.
S05A1899, S05A1900.

#### MORETON ROLLESTON, JR., LIVING TRUST v. ESTATE OF SIMS et al. (two cases).

(622 SE2d 849)

Carley, Justice.

These two cases arise from the latest in a long series of lawsuits related to the collection of a judgment entered in favor of the Estate of Rebecca Wight Randolph Cherry Sims (Estate) against Moreton Rolleston. See *Moreton Rolleston, Jr., Living Trust v. Kennedy,*277 Ga. 541 (591 SE2d 834) (2004). Here, as in the previous actions, the Moreton Rolleston, Jr., Living Trust (Trust) claims that real property is not subject to levy because title is held by it, rather than by Rolleston individually. After filing this action against the Estate and its executor, the Trust moved for default judgment. The trial court denied the motion and, in Case Number S05A1899, the Trust has filed a direct appeal from that order. Subsequently, the trial court dismissed the Trust’s complaint with prejudice, concluding that the suit was barred by the principle of res judicata and that the claim lacked a justiciable basis in fact or law, was utterly vexatious and frivolous, and was brought for an improper purpose. In Case Number S05A1900, the Trust appeals from that order. The two cases are hereby consolidated for disposition in this single opinion.

*Case Number S05A1899*

1. Denial of a motion for default judgment is an interlocutory ruling which cannot be appealed directly. *Ware v. Handy Storage,*222 Ga. App. 339 (474 SE2d 240) (1996). Accordingly, this case is hereby dismissed and, pursuant to Rule 6 of this Court, a $2,500 penalty for filing a frivolous appeal is imposed against the Trust and its attorney.

*Case Number S05A1900*

2. The trial court correctly determined that all issues raised in this action were conclusively resolved against the Trust and in favor of the Estate by the rulings in previous actions. S*ee Morton Rolleston, Jr., Living Trust v. Kennedy,*supra. Accordingly, the dismissal of the *33complaint is affirmed and, pursuant to Rule 6 of this Court, an additional $2,500 frivolous appeal penalty is imposed against the Trust and its attorney.

Decided November 21, 2005.

*Moreton Rolleston, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Shelby A. Outlaw,*for appellee.

*Appeal dismissed and penalty imposed in Case Number S05A1899. Judgment affirmed and penalty imposed in Case Number S05A1900.*

*All the Justices concur, except Sears, C. J., who concurs specially.*

SEARS, Chief Justice,

concurring specially.

Moreton Rolleston fully deserves the sanctions imposed by the majority in this case, as his frivolous and reprehensible conduct has caused needless hardship for his opponents in this litigation. In my opinion, however, Rolleston has also disgraced the legal profession generally, and has thereby forfeited the privilege of practicing law in this State. Accordingly, this Court should utilize its inherent authority to order that he be disbarred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         243,606
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               243,606
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 243,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,814
<OTHER-SE>                                     233,792
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   243,606
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,410
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,410)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,410)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,410)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARVIN JOHANNE ALCON MARQUEZ,

AKA Arvin Johanne Marquez,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 14-73672

Agency No. A206-407-319

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 21, 2015** 

Before: CANBY, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Arvin Johanne Alcon Marquez, a native and citizen of the Philippines,

petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his

application for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention

FILED

JUL 28 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Silaya v. Mukasey,

524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Alcon Marquez

failed to establish that he was or would be persecuted on account of any protected

ground. See Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir. 2009) (the

REAL ID Act “requires that a protected ground represent ‘one central reason’ for

an asylum applicant’s persecution”); Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th

Cir. 2010) (“[a]n alien’s desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated

by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected

ground”); Molina-Morales v. INS, 237 F.3d 1048, 1051-52 (9th Cir. 2001)

(personal retribution is not persecution on account of a protected ground). Thus,

Alcon Marquez’s withholding of removal claim fails.

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief because

Alcon Marquez failed to establish it is more likely than not he would be tortured at

the instigation of or with the acquiescence of the government if returned to the

Philippines. See Silaya, 524 F.3d at 1073.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 14-73672
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                         11,580,928
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                   8,435,224
<ALLOWANCES>                      191,401
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               20,577,789
<PP&E>                          2,400,656
<DEPRECIATION>                    950,755
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 28,667,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           6,089,865
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           51,820
<OTHER-SE>                     22,071,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   28,667,714
<SALES>                        26,776,838
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               26,776,838
<CGS>                          10,198,862
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  10,198,862
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               13,264,282
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 48,440
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 3,751,736
<INCOME-TAX>                    1,377,214
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             2,374,522
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                    2,374,522
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.44



</TABLE>
Order filed March 30, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________

NO. 14-20-00553-CV

____________

IN RE HOUSTON AN USA, LLC D/B/A AUTONATION USA HOUSTON, 

Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

On Appeal from the 334th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-27755

CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

On August 6, 2020, relator Houston AN USA, LLC d/b/a Autonation USA 

Houston, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. Relator asks this court 

to order the Honorable Steven Kirkland, Judge of the 334th District Court, in Harris

County, Texas, to set aside his July 27, 2020 order, granting real party interest’s 

motion to compel discovery responses. 

Because Judge Kirkland ceased to hold the office of Judge of the 334th 

District Court, Harris County, Texas, we are required to abate this mandamus 

proceeding to permit the respondent’s successor, the Honorable Dawn Deshea 

Rogers, to consider the decision regarding relator’s request for relief. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 7.2(b); see also In re Baylor Med. Ctr. at Garland, 280 S.W.3d 227, 228 

(Tex. 2008) (orig. proceeding) (“Mandamus will not issue against a new judge for 
what a former one did.”). On January 5, 2021, we abated this case for a period of 

thirty days and directed the new presiding judge to advise the court of the action 

taken on relator’s request.

On January 26, 2021, Judge Rogers signed an order partially vacating the July 

27, 2020 order granting real party in interest’s motion to compel discovery responses

as to requests for production nos. 17, 20, 34, 35, 36, 39, and 41 and setting a hearing 

on those requests for production for February 26, 2021. Judge Rogers filed her 

January 26, 2021 order in this court on February 4, 2021. 

Judge Rogers has not advised the court of her ruling on the requests for 

production she considered at the February 26, 2021 hearing. Therefore, the

abatement of this case is continued until April 19, 2021. On or before that date, 

Judge Rogers shall advise the court of the action taken on the requests for production 

considered at the February 26, 2021 hearing by filing a signed order reflecting her 

ruling. The court will then consider a motion to reinstate or dismiss the original 

proceeding, as appropriate.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Jewell and Zimmerer.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Zevotek, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Robert Babkie, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November
15, 2010





/s/
      Robert BabkieRobert
      Babkie, President, Chief Executive Officer,
                  Chief
      Financial Officer and Director
                  (Principal
      Executive and Principal Financial and Accounting
  Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350



(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the annual report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nick J. Caruso, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                                                                    
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |    
|Date: March 5, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/    NICK J. CARUSO                                              
|                    |  |     |  | Nick J. Caruso Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dynegy Holdings Inc. and will be retained by Dynegy Holdings Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-3 No. 333-93051,  Form S-3/A No. 333-81263 and Form S-8 Nos.  333-84567,
333-48867,   333-31297,  333-23095,  333-06081,  33-62543,  33-80594,  33-53432,
33-45469,  33-41945,  33-25230,  33-19851, and 33-16625) pertaining to the Komag
Incorporated Deferred  Compensation Plan, the Komag,  Incorporated Restated 1987
Stock Option Plan, the Komag Material  Technology,  Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan,
the Komag,  Incorporated  Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Komag,  Incorporated
Restated 1987 Stock Option Plan, the - Komag,  Incorporated  1988 Employee Stock
Purchase  Plan,  the  Dastek,   Inc.  1992  Stock  Option  Plan,  and  the  1997
Supplemental Stock Option Plan of our report dated January 21, 2000 (except Note
16 as to which the date is March 17,  2000),  with  respect to the  consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Komag, Incorporated included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 2, 2000.


                                           Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
March 29, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1998 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,772
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,017
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,789
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,727
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,893
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    79,620
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,672
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,620
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,052
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,052
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,052
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.00
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-70,371]

Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on May 21, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers of Computer Sciences Corporation, Foremost Account, Caledonia, Michigan.

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition (TA-W-70,340) filed on May 21, 2009 that is the subject of an ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of June 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-15748 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
906 A.2d 438

#### IN THE MATTER OF AMIN KHALIL HUSSAIN-EL, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 20, 2006.

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a petition with the Court seeking the immediate temporary suspension of AMIN KHALIL HUSSAIN-EL of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, for failure to cooperate in an ethics investigation as required by *Rule*1:20 — 3(g)(3), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*1:20 — 3(g)(4), AMIN KHALIL HUSSAIN-EL is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending his full cooperation with the Office of Attorney Ethics and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that AMIN KHALIL HUSSAIN-EL be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

. ORDERED that AMIN KHALIL HUSSAIN-EL comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.