alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
a/k/a 

Mike Smith,

DANNY BANNOUT, : Criminal No. 10-366 (WHW)

a/k/a “D,”

ANSELMO JIMENES,

a/k/a “Ansemo Jimenes,”

and : CONTINTThNCE ORDER

LUIS REYES

This matter having been opened to the Court on the

joint application of defendants Kelvin L. Jones (Michael A.

Orozco, Esq., appearing), Danny Bannout (Harry C. Batchelder,

Jr., Esq., appearing), Anselmo Jimenes (Edward Sapone, Esq.,

appearing), Luis Reyes (Paulette Pitt, Esq., appearing) and Paul

J. Fishman, United States Attorney (Christopher J. Gramiccioni

and Eric T. Kanefsky, Esqs., appearing) for an Order resetting

the date for the commencement of trial. Having found such Order

to be appropriate and good cause having been shown, the Court

makes the following findings in support of entering such Order:

1. The defendants require additional time to obtain

and review discovery, to prepare a defense at trial, and to

determine whether a plea disposition is in their best interests.

2. All parties to this case have consented to the

proposed adjournment.
IT IS, therefore, on this 

day of July, 2010,

ORDERED that:

1. Trial in the aforementioned case shall

commence on November 3, 2010 at 9:30 a.m.;

2. All pretrial motions not otherwise

specifically provided for in the Court’s Order for Discovery andInspection dated July 7, 2010 in this case will be deemed waived

unless they are filed and served not later than:

Defts. motions to be filed by: September 27, 2010

Gov’t response by: October 25, 2010

Oral Argument (if necessary): To be set by Court

2. The time period from July 27, 2010 to November

3, 2010 shall be excluded from computing time under the Speedy

Trial Act of 1974; and

3. The remaining provisions of the Order for

Discovery and Inspection dated

remain in full force and effect.

HON

United States District Judge

2
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Network Communications, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC.January 15, 2008
    /s/  Daniel R. McCarthyDaniel R. McCarthyChairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### Oriental Buffet & Grill Inc., Appellant, v Vornado Gun Hill Road LLC, Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 889]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann BriganttiHughes, J.), entered January 9, 2006, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief, granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and *437awarded defendant a judgment of possession, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

No triable issues were raised as to whether there were equitable grounds to relieve plaintiff tenant of the consequences of its failure to exercise its renewal option in a timely fashion. Plaintiffs expenditures for nonpermanent fixtures did not constitute a forfeiture justifying equitable relief *(see e.g. Trieste Group, LLC v Ark Fifth Ave. Corp.,*13 AD3d 207 [2004]). Nor did defendant landlord’s failure to object to the late renewal constitute a waiver *(see Bank of N.Y. v Murphy,*230 AD2d 607, 608 [1996], *lv dismissed*89 NY2d 1030 [1997]), particularly in light of the no-waiver clause in the lease *(see Avenue of Ams. Deli Corp. v MA Enters., Inc.,*4 Misc 3d 139[A], 2004 NY Slip Op 50941[U] [App Term 2004]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Saxe, J.P, Marlow, Nardelli, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
#### Gamewell Fire-Alarm Tel. Co. *v.*The Mayor, etc.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

April 19, 1887.)

1. Municipal Corporations—Action Against—Presentation op Claims.

The laws oí New York, (section 1104, *d.*410, Laws 1882,) respecting the presentation of claims against the citjr of New York to the comptroller for adjustment before bringing suit, only apply to such claims as can be prosecuted in the state courts by the actions or proceedings mentioned in section 1103.

2. Federal Courts—Equity Jurisdiction.

The equity jurisdiction of the courts of the United States is subject to neither limitation nor restraint by the state authorities, and is uniform throughout the different states of the Union.

3. Equity Pleading—Answer—Corporation.

Although a corporation cannot he compelled to answer to a bill in equity, under oath, it can be required to answer, and must answer fully.

In Equity. Bill for infringement of letters patent.

The defendant filed an answer which pleaded, (1) failure to make demand on the comptroller of the city of New York before bringing suit, as required by Laws N. Y. 1882, c. 410, § 1104; (2) denial of title; (3) non-infringement; (4) insufficient specification; (5) surreptitiously obtaining patent for invention of another; (6) want of novelty; and, (7) public use for more than two years. The complainant filed exceptions to the first defense stated, on the ground of impertinence, and other exceptions for insufficiency, in failing to answer the interrogatories in the bill.

*Charles N. Judson,*for complainant.

*Betts, Atterhury & Betts,*for defendants.

Wallace, J.

The exceptions to the answer for impertinence are sustained for the reasons, (1) that the laws of New York, (section 1104, c. 410, Laws 1882,) respecting the presentation of claims against the city *313of New York to the comptroller for adjustment before bringing suit, only apply to such claims as can be prosecuted in the state courts by the actions or proceedings mentioned in section 1103; and, (2) if this enactment wore intended to apply to actions at law brought in the federal courts, it would not apply to suits in equity. The equity jurisdiction of the courts of the United States is subject to neither limitation nor restraint by the stale authorities, and is uniform throughout the different states of the Union. *U. S.*v. *Howland, 4*Wheat. 108, 115; *Payne*v. *Hook,*7 Wall. 430; *Green*v. *Creighton,*23 How. 105.

The exceptions for insufficiency are also sustained. Although a corporation cannot be compelled to answer to a bill in equity under oath, it can be required to answer, and must answer fully. *Colgate*v. *Compagnie Francaise,*23 Blatchf. 88, *28 Fed.*Rep. 82; *Kittredge v. Claremont Bank,*1 Woodb. & M. 244; *Reed*v. *Cumberland Mut. Ins. Co.,*36 N. J. Eq. 393.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Regal Life Concepts, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended May 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Xiao
Wen Guan, Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:  September
8, 2009





/s/ Xiao
Wen Guan


XIAO WEN
GUAN


Secretary,
Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer


and
Director
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1187 

To prevent childhood exposure to chlorpyrifos through certain school meal 

programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 11, 2019 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To prevent childhood exposure to chlorpyrifos through certain 

school meal programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe School Meals for 

5 Kids Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PREVENTING CHILDHOOD DIETARY EXPOSURE TO 

7 CHLORPYRIFOS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning with the 2018–2019 

9 school year, the Secretary of Agriculture (referred to in 

10 this section as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall phase out all food 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1187 IS

1 that has been treated with, or has levels in excess of the 

2 threshold established by the Secretary under subsection 

3 (b)(1) of, chlorpyrifos residue in food— 

4 (1) in school meals provided under the Richard 

5 B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 1751 et seq.); 

7 (2) in school meals provided under the school 

8 breakfast program established by section 4 of the 

9 Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1773); and 

10 (3) provided by the Department of Defense 

11 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program. 

12 (b) REQUIREMENTS.—In carrying out subsection (a), 

13 the Secretary shall— 

14 (1) establish a threshold for chlorpyrifos for the 

15 food described in subsection (a) of not more than 

16 .001 micrograms of chlorpyrifos per kilogram of 

17 food, as the Secretary determines to be necessary; 

18 (2) provide guidance, in consultation with State 

19 and local educational agencies, to eliminate chlorpyr20 ifos from meals provided by schools, which may in21 clude guidance or criteria related to food procure22 ment or supply contract policies; 

23 (3) periodically update the guidance described 

24 in paragraph (2); and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 1187 IS

1 (4) provide technical assistance to State and 

2 local educational agencies to enforce the require3 ments of this section. 

4 (c) REVIEW BY THE SECRETARY.—Not later than 

5 January 1, 2020, and every 2 years thereafter until Janu6 ary 1, 2028, the Secretary shall conduct a review to evalu7 ate whether, based on reports provided by State and local 

8 educational agencies, any of the food described in sub9 section (a) exceeds the threshold for chlorpyrifos estab10 lished by the Secretary under subsection (b)(1). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Randolph Gress, certify that:

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innophos Holdings, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided Innophos Holdings, Inc. and will be retained
by Innophos Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned
expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: August 3, 2010



/S/ RANDOLPH GRESSRandolph GressChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed
as a part of the Report.
Order entered January 6, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00055-CV

B.J. STRATTON AND KENNETH STRATTON, Appellants

V.

RITA ROBINS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-11516

ORDER

This is an appeal from a judgment following a bench trial conducted in the above 

referenced cause on October 16-17, 2018. Volume 5 of the reporter’s record from the trial shows 

that Court’s Exhibit No. 1 is a videotaped deposition of appellee Rita Robins. The reporter’s 

record also states that the exhibit is “located at the end of all the exhibits.” Our record does not, 

however, contain the videotaped deposition. Accordingly, we ORDER Vielica Dobbins, 

Official Court Reporter of the 193rd Judicial District Court in Dallas County, Texas, to file a 

supplemental reporter’s record including Court’s Exhibit No. 1, the videotaped deposition, in the 

above numbered cause with the Clerk of the Court of Appeals, Fifth District of Texas no later 

than seven (7) days from the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order electronically to Vielica 

Dobbins, Official Court Reporter of the 193rd Judicial District Court in Dallas County, Texas. 

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Sterling Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tito L. Lima, Chief FinancialOfficer and Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |

| Dated:          March 13, 2006 | By:    | /s/ Tito L. Lima                      |
|--------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                           |   |                                       |
|                           |   | Tito L. Lima                          |
|                           |   | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

----
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Richard Heyse,
certify that:

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innophos, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided Innophos Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Innophos
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned expressly disclaims any
obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: May 14, 2007



/S/ RICHARD HEYSERichard HeyseVice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as a part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Case 2:11-cr-00102-JLL Document 2 Filed 02/17/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 11
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Randolph Gress,
certify that:

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innophos Holdings, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided Innophos Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Innophos
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned expressly disclaims any
obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: May 9, 2008

/s/ RANDOLPH GRESSRandolph Gress Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as a part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
911 A.2d 66

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SCOTT L. CAWTHRON, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

November 22, 2006.

ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, limited solely to defendant’s sentence in respect of Count 6. On that *574issue, the matter is summarily remanded to the trial court for resentencing in light of the Court’s decision in *State v. Thomas,*188 *N.J.*137, 902 A.2d 1185 (2006).
2. Ehe Detainee is charged in this District by Indictment with a violation of 18 U.S.C. 1962 & 1963.

3. The Detainee will return to the custody of the detaining facility upon termination of proceedings,

4. The Detainee will be required in Newark, New Jersey, before the Hon. Stanley R. Chesler, U.S.D.J., on Tuesday, June 19, 2012, at 10:00 am, for a Sentencing Hearing. A Writ of Habeas Corpus should be issued for that purpose.

DATED: June 12, 2012 S:MELISSA L. JAMPOL

Melissa Jampol

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Petitioner (973) 645-2772

ORDER

Let the Writ Issue.

DATED: /&; j

nIeyR.ChesIer,U.S.D.J.

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

The United States of America to Warden of the New Jersey State Department of Corrections, Northern State Prison:

WE COMMAND YOU that you have the body of

Ricky Coleman, SBI#7I7340B,

now confined at the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS NORTHERN STATE PRISON,.brought before the United States District Court, the Hon. Stanley R. Chesler, U.S.D.J., at Newark, NJ, on Tuesday, June 19,2012 at 10:00 am, so that the Detainee may attend a Sentencing Hearing the above-captioned

matter. Immediately upon completion of the proceedings, the Detainee will be returned to said place of confinement in safe and secure conduct.

WITNESS the Honorable Stanley R. Chesler

United States District Judge

Newark, New Jersey.

DATED: //3 bO / 9 WILLIAM T.WALSH

Clerk of the US, District Court

for the District of New Jersey

mpuier74
EXHIBIT 21.1

SONUS NETWORKS, INC.  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Name

Jurisdiction of IncorporationSonus International, Inc.

DelawareSonus Securities Corp.

MassachusettsSonus Networks (Austria) GmbH

AustriaSonus Networks Limited

United KingdomSonus Networks Pte. Ltd.

SingaporeNihon Sonus Networks K.K.

JapanWestford Networks Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.

MexicoSonus Networks GmbH

GermanySonus Networks EURL

FranceSonus Networks España, S.R.L.

SpainSonus Networks India Private Limited

IndiaSonus Networks Trading Private Limited

IndiaSonus Networks (HK) Limited

Hong KongSonus Networks s.r.o.

Czech RepublicSonus Networks Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.

MalaysiaSonus Networks Corp.

CanadaSonus Networks AB

Sweden


---



QuickLinks