alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-3 Nos. 333-61940 and 333-66982 and Forms S-8 Nos.
333-54932, 333-53970, 333-43334 and 333-105215) of Sonus Networks, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated March 14,
2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Sonus Networks, Inc., Sonus Networks, Inc. management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sonus Networks, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2004.



Boston,
Massachusetts
March 14, 2005

---



QuickLinks
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 16, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00007

- CV

IN RE Candace HARDIN

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

On January 4, 2019, r elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the

petition, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition

for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on January 16, 2019.

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of January, 2019

.

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016CI20115, styled Candace Denman v. Derrick Denman , pending in the

150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Renée Yanta presiding.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1242 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that bonds used 

to finance professional stadiums are not treated as tax-exempt bonds. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 30, 2019 

Mr. BOOKER (for himself and Mr. LANKFORD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure 

that bonds used to finance professional stadiums are 

not treated as tax-exempt bonds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NO TAX-EXEMPT BONDS FOR PROFESSIONAL 

4 STADIUMS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 103(b) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(4) PROFESSIONAL STADIUM BOND.—Any pro9 fessional stadium bond.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1242 IS

1 (b) PROFESSIONAL STADIUM BOND DEFINED.—Sec2 tion 103(c) of such Code is amended by adding at the end 

3 the following new paragraph: 

4 ‘‘(3) PROFESSIONAL STADIUM BOND.—The 

5 term ‘professional stadium bond’ means any bond 

6 issued as part of an issue any proceeds of which are 

7 used to finance or refinance capital expenditures al8 locable to a facility (or appurtenant real property) 

9 which, during at least 5 days during any calendar 

10 year, is used as a stadium or arena for professional 

11 sports exhibitions, games, or training.’’. 

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section shall apply to bonds issued after the date of 

14 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey
Park, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of SXC Health Solutions Corp.; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:

May 9, 2012By:

/s/ Jeffrey ParkJeffrey ParkChief Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James Pearce, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Star Resorts
      Development Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2008 fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | (2) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Star Resorts Development Inc..                                                              

Date: November 14, 2008

/s/ James Pierce James
Pierce Chief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer and
Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Star Resorts
Development Inc. and will be retained by Star Resorts Development Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-2   Filed 06/17/11   Page 1 of 16 PageID: 40

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-2   Filed 06/17/11   Page 2 of 16 PageID: 41

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-2   Filed 06/17/11   Page 3 of 16 PageID: 42

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-2   Filed 06/17/11   Page 4 of 16 PageID: 43

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-2   Filed 06/17/11   Page 5 of 16 PageID: 44

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-2   Filed 06/17/11   Page 6 of 16 PageID: 45

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-2   Filed 06/17/11   Page 7 of 16 PageID: 46

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-2   Filed 06/17/11   Page 8 of 16 PageID: 47

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-2   Filed 06/17/11   Page 9 of 16 PageID: 48

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-2   Filed 06/17/11   Page 10 of 16 PageID: 49

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-2   Filed 06/17/11   Page 11 of 16 PageID: 50

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-2   Filed 06/17/11   Page 12 of 16 PageID: 51

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-2   Filed 06/17/11   Page 13 of 16 PageID: 52

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-2   Filed 06/17/11   Page 14 of 16 PageID: 53

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-2   Filed 06/17/11   Page 15 of 16 PageID: 54

Case 2:11-cr-00164-KSH   Document 16-2   Filed 06/17/11   Page 16 of 16 PageID: 55
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00145-CV 

CHRISTOPHER J. MCLUCAS APPELLANT

V.

RAUL CASTILLO AND YOLANDA 

CASTILLO

APPELLEES 

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 2015-005026-3

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On July 6, 2016, we notified Appellant that the trial court clerk responsible 

for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that payment 

arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as required by 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless 

Appellant made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and provided this 

court with proof of payment by July 18, 2016. The deadline expired without

Appellant making payment arrangements for the clerk’s record. Appellees 

thereafter filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

Five days later, we received “Appellant’s Unopposed First Motion For 

Extension Of Time To Pay For The Clerk’s Record And Reporter’s Record And 

Provide Proof Of Payments And Designations,” contending that the reason he 

was unable to pay for the record was due to his counsel’s illness.

2 Appellees 

filed a response opposing Appellant’s motion for extension of time to pay for the 

clerk’s record and attached an enforcement order showing that Appellant’s 

counsel had appeared in court with Appellant on the July 18 deadline; Appellees 

argue that Appellant’s counsel’s health had nothing to do with Appellant missing 

the court-imposed July 18, 2016 deadline for paying for the clerk’s record.

After reviewing Appellant’s motion for extension and Appellees’ response, 

it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of 

prosecution. Accordingly, we deny “Appellant’s Unopposed First Motion For 

Extension Of Time To Pay For The Clerk’s Record And Reporter’s Record And 

Provide Proof Of Payments And Designations,” we grant “Appellees Raul Castillo 

 

2The motion alleges that Appellant’s counsel Gary Tucker had an illness 

that interfered with his ability to perform his responsibilities in a timely manner. 

The motion was not filed by Mr. Tucker. 
3

and Yolanda Castillo’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Prosecution,” and 

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: July 28, 2016
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regal Life Concepts, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

   1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:  October 10, 2008


/s/ Eric Wildstein
-------------------------------------------
Eric Wildstein, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
Case 2:11-mj-06541-JAD Document 54 Filed 09/22/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 87
#### Jorge J. SOLANO-MORETA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tracy W. JOHNS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 12-7598.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 13, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 19, 2012.

*258Jorge J. Solano-Moreta, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jorge J. Solano-Moreta, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Solano-Moreta v. Johns,*No. 5:12-hc-02004-D, 2012 WL 3060879 (E.D.N.C. July 26, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V E N T H C IR C U IT DE C 6 , 2006 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 06- 1232 7

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Docket N o. 02-00100 CV -H TW -1 ELAINE W RIGHT, Pl ai nti ff -Appe llant, ve rs us METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMP ANY, De fendant-Appellee.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court fo r the N orthe rnD istri ct

of G eo rg ia

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ (D ec em be r 6, 200 6) Before AN DE RSO N and BARKET T, Circuit Judges, and GO LD BE RG, * Judg e.

________________ *Honora ble Richard W. Goldber g , J udg e, United States Court of International Trade , sitti ngby desig nation.2

PE R CU RIA M: A ft er or al a rg um en t and c ar ef

ul c onsi de ratio n, w e co nc lud e tha t the j udgm ent of the district court is due to b e af firm ed for the r easons discu ssed at oral ar gum en t. AFFIR MED.
KEVIN T. KUTYLA, ESQ. 

83 Spring Street

Newton, NJ 07860

(973) 940-8970 / (973) 940-8973 (fax)

Attorneys for Plaintiff

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

JAMES WRIGHT,

Plaintiff(s),

-againstHARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES 

GROUP; THE HARTFORD BENEFIT 

MANAGEMENT SERVICES; GDB CLAIMS 

AND SERVICES OPERATIONS; ABC 1-

10 (that being the names of the 

corporate entities, companies, 

partnership or individuals 

intended),

Defendant(s).

Civil Action No.: 2:11-cv-00602

Hon. Stanley R. Chesler,

 U.S.D.J.

Hon. Michael A. Shipp, U.S.M.J.

CERTIFICATION OF

SERVICE

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE

I, Kevin T. Kutyla, do hereby certify that the moving papers 

were served upon the United States District Court, District of New 

Jersey by ECP and upon defendants’ attorney, Daniel Meier, Esq., 

Sedgwick, LLP, 125 Broad Street, 39th Flr., New York, NY 10004 via 

overnight UPS mail.

/s/ Kevin T. Kutyla

_________________________________

KEVIN T. KUTYLA, ESQ.

Dated: January 27, 2012

Case 2:11-cv-00602-SRC -MAS Document 56 Filed 01/27/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1910
Case 2:11-cr-00141-SDW Document 20 Filed 12/08/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 54
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Drew Bonnell, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Coronado Corp. for
      the period ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Coronado Corp.                                                                 

Dated: May 17, 2010

| | /s/
      Drew Bonnell                                     
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | Drew Bonnell                                               
| | Secretary, Treasurer and CFO                               
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting
| | Officer)                                                   
| | Coronado Corp.                                             

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Coronado Corp.
and will be retained by Coronado Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
# Table 1800. stnd error quintile
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Section 1350 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Dollarama Group L.P. and Dollarama Group Holdings L.P. (together, the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 2, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), I, Larry Rossy, Chief Executive Officer of the general partner of the Company, Dollarama Group GP Inc., certify that to my knowledge: 

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, as amended; and 

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. 

Date: September 9, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

DEBRA NICHOLL-KENNER, 

Plaintiff, 

V. 

LAWRENCEVILLE UROLOGY, P.A., 

PREMIER UROLOGY ASSOCIATES, LLC, 

AND JULIE PRETTYMAN, 

Defendants. 

Docket No.: 3:11 -cv-00 I 95-MLC-DEA 

A Civil Action 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO AMEND 

THEIR ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

TO: Ari R. Karpf, Esquire 

KARPF & KARPF, P.C. 

3070 Bristol Pike 

Building 2, Suite 231 

Bensalem, PA 19020 

Attorneys for Plaint ff Debra Nicholl-Kenner 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, on Monday, May 2, 2011, the undersigned attorneys 

will move the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for an Order allowing 

Defendants Lawrenceville Urology, P.A., Premier Urology Associates, LLC, and Julie Prettyman 

(collectively, "Defendants") to amend their answer and affirmative defenses ("Motion"). In 

support of the Motion, the Defendants shall rely on the annexed Certification of Alan C. 

Milstein. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, in accordance with Local Rule of Civil 

Procedure 7.1(d)(2), any opposition to the relief requested in the Motion shall be filed with the 

Clerk of Court and served upon the undersigned counsel at least fourteen (14) days prior to the 

return date of the Motion. 

Case 3:11-cv-00195-MLC -DEA Document 9 Filed 04/08/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 28
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that a proposed form of Order incorporating the 

relief sought is submitted herewith. 

Dated: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 Respectfully submitted, 

SHERMAN, SILVERSTEIN, KOHL, 

ROSE & PODOLSKY, P.A. 

By: Is/ Alan C. Milstein 

Alan C. Milstein 

308 Harper Drive, Suite 200 

Moorestown, NJ 08057 

Telephone: 856-662-0700 

Facsimile: 856-488-4744 

Attorneys for Defendants Lawrenceville Urology, 

PA., Premier Urology Associates, LLC, and Julie 

Prettyman 

-2- 

Case 3:11-cv-00195-MLC -DEA Document 9 Filed 04/08/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 29
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 3, 2013

t0826 

# Order

Clerk September 3, 2013

147072

- 3

DEPUTY SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF

MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 147072

- 3

COA: 300936, 304547

Ingham CC: 10

- 000588

- CZ

STATE OF MICHIGAN, SHERIFF’S

COORDINATING AND TRAINING COUNCIL,

MICHIGAN SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION

EDUCATIONAL SERVICE, d/b/a MICHIGAN

SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION, TERRENCE

JUNGEL, SHERIFF’S COORDINATING AND

TRAINING COUNCIL EXECUTIVE

SECRETARY, MISSAUKEE COUNTY

SHERIFF, GENESEE COUNTY SHERIFF,

JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF, CLINTON

COUNTY SHERIFF, ALLEGAN COUNTY

SHERIFF, MACOMB COUNTY SHERIFF, ST.

JOSEPH COUNT Y SHERIFF and HOUGHTON

COUNTY SHERIFF,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 26, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Snowdon Resources Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert
M. Baker, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated this 15th day of December, 2009.




“R.M. Baker”__________________________________


Robert M. Baker


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:11-cv-01570-WJM-MF Document 2 Filed 03/29/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 20
EX-10.25



 Exhibit 10.25 
 AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENTS 
 Pursuant to the MetLife, Inc. 2005
Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), MetLife, Inc. hereby amends each of your Stock Option Agreements under the Plan (the “Agreements”) as of April 25, 2007, as follows (this “Amendment”):

 1. Section 8 of each Agreement is restated in its entirety as follows: 

8. Adjustments. The Committee will make appropriate adjustments in the terms and conditions of your Options in recognition
of unusual or nonrecurring events affecting the Company or its financial statements (such as a Common Stock dividend, Common Stock split, recapitalization, payment of an extraordinary dividend, merger, consolidation, combination, spin-off,
distribution of assets to stockholders other than ordinary cash dividends, exchange of shares, or other similar corporate change), or in recognition of changes to applicable laws, regulations, or accounting principles, to prevent unintended dilution
or enlargement of the potential benefits of your Options. The Committee’s determinations in this regard will be conclusive. 
 2. Any capitalized word used in this Amendment is defined in the Plan or each Agreement. This Amendment will be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Delaware,
regardless of the law that might be applied under principles of conflict of laws. This Amendment, the Agreements, and the Plan represent the entire agreements between you and the Company, and you and all Affiliates, regarding your Options and no
other promises, terms, or agreements of any kind regarding your Options apply. In the event any provision of this Amendment is held illegal or invalid, the rest of the Amendment will remain enforceable. In no event will this amendment be construed
in a manner that would cause you to incur a penalty under Code Section 409A. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused
its duly authorized officer to execute this Amendment. 
  

			
	 METLIFE, INC.

		
	By:	 	/s/ C. Robert Henrikson
		 	  

		 	Name
		
		 	Chairman of the Board, President and CEO
		 	  

		 	Title
		
		 	/s/ C. Robert Henrikson
		 	  

		 	Signature