alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of California Gold Corp.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James D. Davidson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification
as of June 12, 2012.





|/s/ James D. Davidson       | 
|--------------------------- | 
|James D. Davidson           | 
|Chief Executive Officer and | 
|Chief Financial Officer     | 





A signed original of this written statement,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic
version of this written statement, has been provided to California Gold Corp., and will be retained by California Gold Corp., and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT      21**

| Name                                                           | Jurisdiction                of Organization |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                                           |                                        |
| Criticare                Service GmbH                          | Germany                                     |
| Sleep                Care, Inc.                                | Delaware                                    |
| Criticare                Biomedical, Inc.                      | Wisconsin                                   |
| CSI                Trading, Inc.                               | Wisconsin                                   |
| Criticare                International GmbH Marketing Services | Germany                                     |
| Criticare                Integration, Inc.                     | Delaware                                    |
| Criticare                Systems Limited                       | United                Kingdom               |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 925 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 925

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the powers of 
the president remain limited by the Constitution and laws of the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 2020

Mr. Malinowski (for himself, Mr. Phillips, and Mr. Amash) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the powers of 
the president remain limited by the Constitution and laws of the United 
                                States.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives affirms that when 
someone is the president of the United States, their authority is not 
total.
                                 <all>
```
#### Stebbins *against*Willson.

NEW-YORK

October, 1817.

Where a party afterwards obtains a discharge as an insolvent, and then judgment, as in case of nonsuit, is renderedagainst him for not going to trial, his discharge is not a bar to an action to recover the costsontbat judgment.

IN ERROR, on *Certiorari*to a justice’s court.

The plaintiff in error brought an action against the defendant in error, in the court below, for the costs of a judgment of non-suit, in the court of common pleas, of *Saratoga*county, in a suit commenced by the present defendant against the plaintiff, in August, 1811. In *December,*1812, the defendant in this suit was duly discharged as an insolvent, and, in August, 1816, judgment, as in case of nonsuit, was rendered in the court of common pleas, against the defendant for not proceeding to trial in the cause in which he was plaintiff. The only question was, whether the defendant’s discharge was a bar to the action for these costs. The justice gave judgment for the defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment must be reversed. The judgment of nonsuit was entered after the discharge under the insolvent act, and could not, therefore, in any wise, be considered a demand existing prior to the discharge. In *Cone*v. *Whitaker,*(2 *Johns. Cas.*280.) the judgment of nonsuit was entered prior-to the discharge, but the costs were not taxed until after the discharge; it was held, even there, that the costs were not a debt until taxation, and of course not affected by the discharge. In the case of *Warne v. Constant,*(5 *Johns. Rep.*135.) this rule seems to be shaken. It is there held, that where the judgment of non-suit is before the discharge, although the roll may be signed, and costs taxed afterwards, still the costs are barred by the discharge. But, in the case now before us, the judgment of nonsuit was obtained after the discharge, and no case has'been found where the costs, under such circumstances, are deemed to be affected by the discharge.

Judgment reversed.
| 1. | Such quarterly report of Form      10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in such      quarterly report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009,      fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and      results of operations of NORTHEAST AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS,      INC. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 20, 2009                                              |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                      |
| NORTHEAST      AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS, INC.                                  |
|                                                                      |
| By:                                                                       | /s/ William Solko |
| William      SolkoChief      Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer |

----
#### Gro-Wit Capital, Ltd., Appellant, v Obigor, LLC, et al., Respondents.

[824 NYS2d 314]

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), dated December 16, 2005, which denied its motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.

The plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting a mortgage, a note, a stipulation ratifying the mortgage as modified thereby (hereinafter the stipulation), and proof of nonpayment of the note *(see Marculescu v Ovanez,*27 AD3d 701 [2006]; *Marine Midland Bank v Fillippo,*276 AD2d 601 [2000]; *LBV Props, v Greenport Dev. Co.,*188 AD2d 588, 589 [1992]). In opposition, the defendant David Hosten failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

In a prior action to foreclose the same mortgage, the parties thereto, including the plaintiff and David Hosten, entered into the stipulation pursuant to which they agreed, inter alia, to modify the payment terms of the mortgage and to discontinue that action. Hosten’s contention that the stipulation was unenforceable and should be set aside is without merit. “In order to vacate [a] stipulation of settlement on the ground of *860mutual mistake, [a party must] demonstrate that the mistake existed at the time the stipulation was entered into and that it was so substantial that the stipulation failed to represent a true meeting of the parties’ minds” *(Mahon v New York City Health 6 Hosps. Corp.,*303 AD2d 725, 725 [2003]; *see Maury v Maury,*7 AD3d 585, 586 [2004]). Based upon Hosten’s own assertions, the evidence that he proffered purportedly showing that the note had already been paid and the mortgage satisfied at the time the parties entered into the stipulation not only was available to him at that time but he used it as evidence of a meritorious defense to open his default in the original foreclosure action *(cf Star v Star,*260 AD2d 363, 365 [1999]). Thus, his contention that he entered into the stipulation upon a mistake of fact is belied by his own assertions *(see Star v Star, supra*at 365).

Also without merit is Hosten’s contention that the assurances to him by the plaintiff and its counsel regarding the status of the mortgage and note at the time of the stipulation were fraudulent or that he justifiably relied upon these representations of his adversary to his detriment *(see LoGalbo v Plishkin, Rubano & Baum,*197 AD2d 675, 676 [1993]).

Hosten’s remaining contentions are. without merit.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Miller, J.E, Crane, Santucci and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tetragenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Neil
Martucci,  Chief  Financial  Officer  hereby  certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.
Section1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

         1.   The report fully complies with the requirements of  Section  13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in the report fairly  presents,  in  all
              material  respects,   the   financial   condition  and results  of
              operations of the Company as of and for the period covered  by the
              Report.




                                                     /s/ NEIL MARTUCCI
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Neil Martucci
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     November 14, 2007

                                       12
Case 2:11-cr-00080-SDW Document 47 Filed 05/20/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 110
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LIAM PHILLIP CAVANAUGH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, 

CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM and SARAH LYNNE GOAD,

Appellees.

No. 4D17-3318

[December 6, 2018]

Appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support 

Program; L.T. Case Nos. CSE2001073948 and Dep. 06550019665AO.

Gloria C. Gonzalez of the Law Offices of Gloria C. Gonzalez, P.A., 

Hialeah, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Child Support Enforcement, Tallahassee, for 

appellee Department of Revenue Child Support Program.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extraced from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part II, Item 7. of this Form 10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1991
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1991
<CASH>                                         199,363
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  211,861
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               412,781
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 412,781
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          199,533
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,400
<OTHER-SE>                                     213,248
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   412,781
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,322
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,436
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              66,185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,655,738)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                             (1,452,553)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (73,299)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,655,738)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.01)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 18

Nu-kote Holdings, Inc.
Nashville, Tennessee

January 7, 2000

Gentlemen:

We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of Nu-kote Holdings, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 1999 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in shareholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive loss and
cash flows for the year ended March 31, 1999, and have reported thereon under
date of January 7, 2000. The aforementioned financial statements and our audit
report thereon are included in the Company's 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K. As
disclosed in Note 3 to those financial statements, the Company changed its
method of accounting for the costs of its inventories from the last-in first-out
(LIFO) method to the first-in first-out (FIFO) method and indicated that the
newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances because it
better measures the current value of such inventories, avoids distortion of
profits resulting from decrements and deflation, and provides a more appropriate
matching of revenue and expenses for the current and future periods.
Additionally, the change will enhance the comparability of the Company's
financial statements by changing to the predominant method utilized in its
industry.

In accordance with your request, we have reviewed and discussed with Company
officials the circumstances and business judgment and planning upon which the
decision to make this change in the method of accounting was based.

With regard to the aforementioned accounting change, authoritative criteria
have not been established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable
method of accounting over another acceptable method. However, for purposes of
Nu-kote Holdings, Inc.'s compliance with the requirements of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, we are furnishing this letter.

Based on our review and discussion, with reliance on management's business
judgment and planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is
preferable in the Company's circumstances.

Very truly yours,

KPMG LLP
Exhibit
32.1






CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350






In
connection with this Quarterly Report of Explortex Energy Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven
Kurlander, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.
            Such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending July
      31 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and




2.
            The
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
      ending July 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of Explortex Energy
      Inc




By:
/s/Steven Kurlander


Steven
Kurlander


Chief
Executive Officer


Chief
Financial Officer






November
3, 2009
Exhibit 23.2


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements:

(1)     Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-07415, 333-68935, 333-84819,
        333-79995, 333-86805, 333-92815, 333-106090, 333-112549, 333-113384, and
        333-125184) of BNP Residential Properties, Inc.,
(2)     Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-113384
        and 333-125184) of BNP Residential Properties, Inc., and
(3)     Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-119623 and 333-126426)
        pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of BNP
        Residential Properties, Inc.;

of our report dated March 2, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of BNP Residential Properties, Inc. as of December 31,
2004, and for the two years in the period ended December 31, 2004, included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Greenville, South Carolina
March 3, 2006




                                      180
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                                  WELLMAN, INC.
                                  SUBSIDIARIES

ALG, Inc.
Carpet Recycling of Georgia, Inc.
CKB, Co.
DRS Holdings NV
FIISB, Inc.
Fiber Industries, Inc.
Fibres Finance BV
Finwell, Inc.
GuardWell Insurance Company
JCT, Ltd.
Josdav, Inc.
KRP, Ltd.
MED Resins, Inc.
Middlewich Limited
MJR Recycling BV
MRF, Inc.
PermaClear East, Inc.
Prince, Inc.
Resins Finance BV
RGB Co.
Shobara Company
TMD, Co.
Warehouse Associates, Inc.
Wellman BV
Wellman Exports V.I., Inc.
Wellman Fibers Limited
Wellman Finance CV
Wellman France Recyclage SARL
Wellman International Handelsgesellsch GmbH
Wellman International Investments
Wellman International Limited
Wellman International Trading
Wellman of Mississippi, Inc.
Wellman PAC
Wellman PET Resins Europe BV
Wellman Resins LLC
Wellman UK Holdings Limited
Wellman Voluntary Employees Benefit Association
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Jason Incorporated's consolidated balance sheet at December 29, 1995 
and  consolidated statements of income for the twelve month period ended 
December 29, 1995 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to 
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1995
<CASH>                                            1890
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    54819
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                      35602
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                114534
<PP&E>                                          124322
<DEPRECIATION>                                   55512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  279527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            66864
<BONDS>                                         110067<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         34535
<OTHER-SE>                                       51683
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    279527
<SALES>                                         407412
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                407412
<CGS>                                           319188
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   319188
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9932
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  19562
<INCOME-TAX>                                      8031
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              11531
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     11531
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F3>
<FN>
<F1>Company presents receivables on a net basis in compliance with Article 10
Regulation S-X.
<F2>Includes all non-current portion of debt obligations.
<F3>Not reported.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>