alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S05A1959.

#### DELANOVAL v. THE STATE.

(622 SE2d 811)

Melton, Justice.

Segundo Delanoval appeals his conviction for felony murder, aggravated assault, and possession of a knife during the commission of a felony, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict.1 For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the conviction.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the record shows that, on October 23, 1999, Robert Williams, who lived in the same rooming house as Delanoval, started to loudly argue with his girlfriend, Corina Barber, and her mother, Anqunette Barber. Del-anoval, who was Anqunette Barber’s boyfriend, entered the room where the argument was occurring, stepped between Williams and Anqunette Barber, and shouted at them to stop arguing. Williams told Delanoval to leave his room, but Delanoval remained and cursed at Williams. Williams then slapped Delanoval, and their confrontation moved into the hallway. During a heated exchange of words, Delanoval re-entered his room, took a serrated knife from a drawer, walked back into the hallway, and stabbed Williams in the chest, thereby puncturing his heart. Delanoval then ran away from the boarding house with the knife in his hand, and he was apprehended approximately two months later in a homeless shelter. At the time of his arrest, Delanoval admitted to the stabbing.

*37Decided November 21, 2005.

*Carl P. Greenberg,*for appellant.

*Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Bettieanne C. Hart, Marc A. Mallon, Assistant District Attorneys, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Vonnetta L. Benjamin, Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee.

This evidence was sufficient to support Delanoval’s conviction. See *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). Although Delanoval argues that he acted in self-defense, the jury was authorized to disbelieve his testimony in favor of the testimony of the State’s witnesses. See, e.g., *Mickens v. State,*277 Ga. 627, 629 (593 SE2d 350) (2004).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

 Delanoval was indicted on April 25, 2000 for the crimes of malice murder, felony murder, aggravated assault, and possession of a knife during the commission of a felony. Following a jury trial, Delanoval was convicted for felony murder, aggravated assault, and possession of a knife during the commission of a felony on March 15,2002, and he was sentenced to life imprisonment for felony murder, with a consecutive five years for possession of a knife during the commission of a felony. Delanoval’s motion for new trial was denied on July 14,2004, and his notice of appeal was filed on July 21,2004. His appeal, docketed in this Court on August 8,2005, was submitted for decision on the briefs.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of PackItGreen Holdings, Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Jackson, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: September 25, 2009By:/s/ Richard W. JacksonRichard W. Jackson
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-12813

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

RAISSA DJUISSI KENGNE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WESLEY FREEMAN, 

BDO USA, LLP, 

SCOTT MEIER, 

PAUL DAVISON, 

JASON CUDA, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________

USCA11 Case: 22-12813 Document: 16-1 Date Filed: 08/09/2024 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-12813

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

D.C. Docket No. 1:22-cv-02653-SEG-CMS

____________________

Before WILSON, GRANT, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. Raissa Djuissi Kengne has appealed from a magistrate judge’s 

report and recommendation. The magistrate judge’s decision, 

however, is not final, and further, the record does not indicate that 

the parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction. See 28 

U.S.C. §§ 636(b), 636(c)(3), 1291; Donovan v. Sarasota Concrete Co., 

693 F.2d 1061, 1066-67 (11th Cir. 1982); McNab v. J & J Marine, Inc., 

240 F.3d 1326, 1327-28 (11th Cir. 2001) (explaining that we have 

jurisdiction over an appeal from a magistrate judge’s decision only 

if the parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction). 

All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No petition for 

rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other 

requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.

USCA11 Case: 22-12813 Document: 16-1 Date Filed: 08/09/2024 Page: 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CITIMORTGAGE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

VALERIE PERRY,

Defendant.

Civ. No. 11-1000-WJM

ORDER

HON. WILLIAM J. MARTINI

THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon its sua sponte notice of call for 

dismissal pursuant to Local Civil Rule 41.1(a). Defendant filed her notice of removal on 

February 18, 2011, apparently seeking to remove this action from Union County to this 

Court. The Court, after no further filings had been made, entered a notice of call for 

dismissal on June 29, 2011 pursuant to Rule 41.1(a). On July 12, 2011, Defendant filed a 

response opposing the call for dismissal and moving for either default judgment or 

summary judgment against Plaintiff. And although it is unclear from the response, 

defendant also appears to ask this Court to vacate a judgment that may have been entered 

in the state court action. What is apparent, though, is that Defendant opposes Rule 41.1 

dismissal of her case and that her lack of prosecution likely derives from her 

unfamiliarity with legal practice. 

One core problem resulting from that lack of familiarity is the fact that 

Defendant’s February 28, 2011 notice of removal is defective under 28 U.S.C. § 1446 

and Local Civil Rule 5.1(e). Both require that every notice of removal be accompanied by 

Case 2:11-cv-01000-WJM-MF Document 4 Filed 08/17/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 38
“a short and plain statement of the grounds for removal, together with a copy of all 

process, pleadings, and orders served upon such defendant or defendants in such action.” 

That is, Section 1446 and Rule 5.1(e) require the Defendant to provide this Court with 

copies of the filings and decisions from the state court action. Without these records, the 

Court is in no position to adjudicate this dispute. But the Court recognizes Defendant’s 

pro se status and its own obligation to construe filings made by pro se litigants liberally. 

For the foregoing reasons; and good cause shown;

IT IS on this 17th day of August 2011, hereby,

ORDERED that the June 29, 2011 Notice of Call for Dismissal is 

WITHDRAWN; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant is directed to comply with 28 U.S.C. § 1446 and 

Local Civil Rule 5.1(e) by filing copies with the Clerk of this Court of all process, 

pleadings, and orders served upon her in the Union County action by September 12, 

2011; and it is further 

ORDERED that if Defendant fails to comply with this order, the Court will take 

appropriate action, which may include remanding this case to state court.

/s/ William J. Martini

WILLIAM J. MARTINI, U.S.D.J.

Case 2:11-cv-01000-WJM-MF Document 4 Filed 08/17/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 39
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Hostopia.com Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Colin Campbell, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to18 U.S.C. d1350, as adopted pursuantto d906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                                             (1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

                                                (2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
|        |   Date: February 13, 2007 | /s/ COLIN CAMPBELL |
|--------|--------------------------------|--------------------|
|   | Colin Campbell                 |
|   | Chief Executive Officer        |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

____________________________________

:

WASTE MANAGEMENT OF :

NEW JERSEY, INC., :

: Civil Action No. 10-3984 (FSH)

Plaintiff, :

 :

v. :

:

TEAMSTERS-EMPLOYERS LOCAL, : ORDER ON INFORMAL

945 PENSION FUND, ET AL., : APPLICATION

:

Defendants. :

____________________________________:

This matter having come before the Court for a Rule 16 conference on December 2, 2010;

and the parties advising the Court that the delinquent contribution arbitration is scheduled

for January 13, 2011 and January 26, 2011 and will take place under the 2007 agreement;

and the parties advising the Court that a request to arbitrate the withdrawal liability issue

was made in November 2010 and may not be resolved for six months;

and the parties seeking time to review and discuss whether that they will both agree to

proceed under the 2007 agreement without further challenges to doing so in this case, dispensing

with discovery in this case, agreeing to the entry of a final judgment after a final ruling

concerning the collateral estoppel effect of the delinquent contribution arbitration on the

withdrawal liability arbitration;

and if the parties adopt this approach, no discovery will be needed;

and the Court directing the parties to submit a letter either seeking a briefing schedule, if

the aforementioned approach is adopted, or requesting to reconvene the Rule 16 conference to set

Case 2:10-cv-03984-FSH -PS Document 39 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 565
a schedule for the exchange of discovery concerning whether the plaintiff was bound to proceed

under the 2009 agreement;

and for the reasons discussed during the conference;

and for good cause shown,

IT IS ON THIS 2nd day of December, 2010

ORDERED that, no later than December 16, 2010, the parties shall submit a joint letter

that either requests that the Court reconvene the Rule 16 conference or states that the parties have

agreed to proceed under the 2007 agreement without further challenges to doing so in this case,

dispensing with discovery in this case, agreeing to the entry of a final judgment after a final

ruling concerning the collateral estoppel effect of the delinquent contribution arbitration on the

withdrawal liability arbitration and proposing a briefing schedule, together with a proposed order.

s/Patty Shwartz 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:10-cv-03984-FSH -PS Document 39 Filed 12/02/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 566
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Hostopia.com Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Mugan, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to18 U.S.C. d1350, as adopted pursuantto d906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | Date: February  13, 2007 | /s/ MICHAEL J. MUGAN |
|--------|--------------------------|----------------------|
|   | Michael J. Mugan         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

----
Case 2:10-cr-00851-CCC Document 141 Filed 11/03/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 767
Case 2:10-cr-00851-CCC Document 141 Filed 11/03/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 768
**EXHIBIT
      32** **.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. §1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of URON Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB
      for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Donald Miller, Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Donald
      Miller


Chief
      Executive and Chief Financial Officer


November
      14, 2006





Exhibit
          32.1 - Page 1
905 A.2d 873

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. AL-WAHID ALI, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

August 8, 2006.

ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted on the issue of defendant’s sentence, and the matter is summarily remanded to the trial court for resentencing in light of the Court’s decision in *State v. Pierce,*188 *N.J.*155, 902 A.2d 1195 (2006).
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of WaterPure International, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul S.
Lipschutz, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
WaterPure International, Inc. and will be retained by WaterPure International,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





Date:  May
      15, 2008
            By:/s/ PAUL S.
      LIPSCHUTZPaul
      S. LipschutzPrincipal
      Executive Officer
_'J_ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 


DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 


Federal Court Building Violation #: P'd5"40 I-JQ

Building 11499, Riverside.:: Ave 

Fort Monm:outib:, .. NJ'> 07 7 03 

(732)631"",,1446 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ] 

] ORDER 

v. 	 ] 

] Imposing Penalty Provisions of NJSA 39:4·50 & Program 

Requirements of the Intoxicated Driver Resource Centers 

Defendant ] (IDRCs) •••• ASSIMILATED UNDER 32 GF~tlt,a5{f) : \ .3;OC t..F=>3(~ 

The defendant. ~~ Wc ~ .more fully described below. having been charged with a violation 

of N:fflA 09-:4-50(f) and 3i£FR634.26{ffon;CfRy.~ and having been convicted of same on }Jl9!fi1 I e 3 . 

it is on this _A (0 c)'t }I 0 :;;';J7/ttf 03 I vI tJ.J 

ySuc-b \-lv a ;., ] 

(Q) 

ORDERED that, 	 . 

.:IJ 10'(} 0 

1. 	 Defendant shall pay a fine of $~fine + $6:fH2 Special Assessment, and 

2. 	 Defendant's driving privileges e hereby suspended for a period of 2-:t C months: and 

3. Defendant shall be detained for a minimum of"- dwriOSi .. : consecutive days to be served 

as prescribed by the program requirements of the New Jersey Intoxicated Driver Resource Centers. Defendant shall be 

notified by the IDRCJBureau of Alcohol Countermeasures as to the place and time that the period of detainment will be 

served; and 100 

4. 	 Defendant shall serve a term of imprisonment for days to begin on and to be served at 

. and .. 1.11 

-5-.---=D=-e-::f-en-d-:-a-n-:-t-:-sh=-a-:'II:-"s-e-rv-e-a-period of community service of f'IP~~ ; and 

6. 	 Defendant shall be placed on probation for a period of ; and 

It is further ORDERED that. defendant shall be required to satisfy the screening, evaluation, referral and program 

requirements of the State of New Jersey Bureau of Alcohol Countermeasures and the Intoxicated Driver Resource 

Centers. Failure to satisfy such requirements shall result in amanda 0 day term of im risonment' a federal prison 

and a driver !ieans revocation or suspension until such requir . ents fsfi e s s court order in 

accordance with N A 39:5­ . 

DATE: __~~~~~~~~________ 

cc: 	 • Defendant 

United States Department of Probation 

New Jersey Division of Motor Vehicles, Bureau of Court Reports and Fines 

Special Assistant United States Attorney 

Case 2:03-mj-09590-ARM Document 2 Filed 08/27/03 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 3
1 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

__________________________________________

 

JAMES WRIGHT, 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 v. 

 

THE HARTFORD BENEFIT MANAGEMENT 

SERVICES, et al., 

 

Defendants. 

__________________________________________

 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Hon. Faith S. Hochberg, U.S.D.J. 

Civil Case No. 11-602 (FSH) (MAH) 

ORDER

Date: April 12, 2012 

 

HOCHBERG, District Judge; 

This matter comes before the Court upon the cross-motions for summary judgment filed 

by plaintiff and defendants; and 

it appearing that plaintiff’s opposition papers do not include a responsive statement of 

material facts as required by L. Civ. R. 56.1; 

IT IS on this 12th day of April, 2012, 

ORDERED that Plaintiff must file, no later than April 16, 2012, a responsive statement 

of material facts “addressing each paragraph of the movant’s statement, indicating agreement or 

disagreement and, if not agreed, stating each material fact in dispute and citing to the affidavits 

and other documents submitted in connection with the motion; any material fact not disputed 

shall be deemed undisputed for purposes of the summary judgment motion.” L. Civ. R. 56.1; 

and 

Case 2:11-cv-00602-FSH-MAH Document 66 Filed 04/12/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1974
2 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall notify the Court no later than April 

18, 2012 if they wish to file a supplemental reply based on plaintiff’s responsive statement of 

material facts. 

 /s/ Faith S. Hochberg__________ 

 Hon. Faith S. Hochberg, U.S.D.J.

Case 2:11-cv-00602-FSH-MAH Document 66 Filed 04/12/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1975
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 131 (Friday, July 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16375]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

[Docket ID USAF-2009-0044]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Air Force proposes to delete a system of 
records to its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act 
of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
August 10, 2009 unless comments are received which result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Air Force Privacy Act Officer, Office 
of Warfighting Integration and Chief Information Officer, SAF/XCPPI, 
1800 Air Force Pentagon, Suite 220, Washington, DC 20330-1800.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ben Swilley at (703) 696-6648.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of the Air Force systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the address above.
    The Department of the Air Force proposes to delete one system of 
records notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion 
is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 
(5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or 
altered system report.

    Dated: July 7, 2009.
Morgan E. Frazier,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
F031 AFMC A

System Name:
    AFMC Badge and Vehicle Control Records (January 12, 2009, 74 FR 
1184).

Reason:
    This records collection for this system is already covered by F031 
AF SF B, Security Forces Management Information System (SFMIS) 
published on October 14, 2003, 68 FR 59168. Accordingly, this Privacy 
Act System of Records Notice will be deleted from the Air Force's 
inventory.
[FR Doc. E9-16375 Filed 7-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Exhibit
      32.1








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Waterpure International, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul S.
      Lipschutz, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
      the


Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the


financial
      condition and result of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the


periods
      expressed in the Report..





Date:
      May
      14, 2007     */s/
      Paul S. Lipschutz*


----------------------------------


Paul
      S.
      Lipschutz


Chief
      Executive Officer and President


(Principal
      Executive Officer)