alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tianyin Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, James Jiayuan Tong, Chief Financial Officer & Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.








Date: November 12, 2010








/s/    James Jiayuan TongJames Jiayuan TongChief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer,Chief Business and Development Officer, Director
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-565

Lower Tribunal No. 19-CF-16417

_____________________________

MATTHEW GRIDLEY,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County.

J. Frank Porter, Judge.

February 6, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TRAVER, C.J., and SMITH and MIZE, JJ., concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clayton R. Kaeiser, Special 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Taylor A. Schell, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
|                                         | 31.2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|---------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
|                                        
|I, Lisa Norman, certify that:           
|1.                                       | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Home Alliance Corporation.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|2.                                       | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.
|3.                                       | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results from operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.                





|By:  /s/Lisa NormanLisa Norman
Chief Financial Officer | Date:  April 15, 2015
|------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March 29, 2011 |   | /s/ Christopher J. Schaber            |   |
|----------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|           |   | Christopher J. Schaber, Ph.D.         |   |
|           |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|           |   | (Principal Executive Officer)         |   |

----
Exhibit No. 32.1
----------------
Form 10-Q
Marketing Acquisition Corporation
File No. 0-52072

                    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                       as adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                       of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 -
                      Chief Executive and Financial Officer


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Marketing  Acquisition  Corporation
(Company) on Form 10-Q for the period  ended March 31,  2008,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (Report),  I, Timothy P.
Halter, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  adopted  as  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Dated: April 29, 2008                      By:      /s/ Timothy P. Halter
       --------------                      -------------------------------------
                                                               Timothy P. Halter
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer





A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Marketing Acquisition  Corporation and will be retained by Marketing
Acquisition  Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rashford Emanuel GALLOWAY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-7444.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 13, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 18, 2012.

Rashford Emanuel Galloway, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rashford Emanuel Galloway seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Galloway has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe Galloway’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. *United States v. Winestock,*340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir.2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a sue-*234cessive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) newly-discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or (2) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(h) (West Supp. 2012). Galloway’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 52 Filed 01/07/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 1206
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 52 Filed 01/07/11 Page 2 of 10 PageID: 1207
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 52 Filed 01/07/11 Page 3 of 10 PageID: 1208
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 52 Filed 01/07/11 Page 4 of 10 PageID: 1209
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 52 Filed 01/07/11 Page 5 of 10 PageID: 1210
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 52 Filed 01/07/11 Page 6 of 10 PageID: 1211
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 52 Filed 01/07/11 Page 7 of 10 PageID: 1212
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 52 Filed 01/07/11 Page 8 of 10 PageID: 1213
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 52 Filed 01/07/11 Page 9 of 10 PageID: 1214
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 52 Filed 01/07/11 Page 10 of 10 PageID: 1215
**Exhibit 31.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Raymond D’Aponte, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Planet Payment, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 
|                                                 |     |                        |
|------------------------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------|
|     Date:   October 9, 2015 | By:      | /s/   Raymond D’Aponte |
|                                                 |     | Raymond   D’Aponte     |
| * *                                             | * * | *C**hief Financial Officer* |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1321 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1321

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit interference with 
         voting systems under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defending the Integrity of Voting 
Systems Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON INTERFERENCE WITH VOTING SYSTEMS.

    Section 1030(e) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``or'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by adding ``or'' at the 
                end; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) that--
                            ``(i) is part of a voting system; and
                            ``(ii)(I) is used for the management, 
                        support, or administration of a Federal 
                        election; or
                            ``(II) has moved in or otherwise affects 
                        interstate or foreign commerce;'';
            (2) in paragraph (11), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (3) in paragraph (12), by striking the period and inserting 
        a semicolon; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(13) the term `Federal election' means any election (as 
        defined in section 301(1) of the Federal Election Campaign Act 
        of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30101(1))) for Federal office (as defined in 
        section 301(3) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (52 
        U.S.C. 30101(3))); and
            ``(14) the term `voting system' has the meaning given the 
        term in section 301(b) of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (52 
        U.S.C. 21081(b)).''.

            Passed the Senate July 17, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1321

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit interference with 
         voting systems under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
```
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 749 

Recognizing the 50th anniversary of Taco John’s and celebrating the contributions the company and its franchise owners provide to local communities 

across the country. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 9, 2019 

Mrs. AXNE (for herself, Ms. CHENEY, Mr. BACON, and Mr. SMITH of Nebraska) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 50th anniversary of Taco John’s and celebrating the contributions the company and its franchise 

owners provide to local communities across the country. 

Whereas, in 1968, restaurateur John Turner approached 

camper and trailer manufacturer, Harold Homes, to build 

a small taco shop in celebration of the annual Cheyenne 

Frontier Days; 

Whereas, in 1969, John Turner and Harold Holmes bought 

the franchising rights to Taco John’s after the restaurant’s initial success proved to be popular within the 

community; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 749 IH 

Whereas Taco John’s franchise business model allows new 

entrepreneurs across the country to go into business for 

themselves, but not by themselves; 

Whereas Taco John’s and its franchise owners provide crucial 

support to local communities through vocational training 

and corporate social responsibility initiatives; 

Whereas Taco John’s makes important societal contributions 

by sponsoring educational programs and also has developed a partnership with Jonah Bank to fund suicide prevention programs in Wyoming; 

Whereas, by utilizing the franchise business model, Taco 

John’s provides comprehensive training opportunities and 

scalability, offering entry-level workers with lifelong skills 

that are versatile across industries; 

Whereas today, Taco John’s operates and franchises nearly 

400 restaurants in 23 States and supports over 13,000 

jobs, making it one of the largest Mexican quick-service 

restaurant brands in America; 

Whereas the restaurant brand is concentrated in Wyoming, 

Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, 

Illinois, and Minnesota; 

Whereas Taco John’s trademarked the rights to the worldwide celebration of Taco Tuesday; 

Whereas Taco John’s has created popular and innovative 

menu options, specifically the ‘‘Six Pack and a Pound’’, 

‘‘Potato Ole’’, ‘‘Nachos Navidad’’, and other menu 

classics that are enjoyed by customers across the country; 

and 

Whereas Taco John’s is a pride of the West and Midwest: 

Now, therefore, be it 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 749 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the 50th anniversary of Taco John’s and celebrates 

3 the contributions the company and its franchise owners 

4 provide to local communities across the country. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
1 The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1999

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. John Cogbill, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: February 10, 2005 Filed: February 16, 2005

___________ Before BYE, RILEY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. After John Cogbill (Cogbill) pled guilty to possessing cocaine base with intent to distribute, the district court 1 sentenced him–in accordance with his plea agreement– to the mandatory statutory minimum of 120 months imprisonment. See21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). Cogbill appeals. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Having carefully reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. See United States v. Reyes-Contreras , 349 F.3d 524, 525 (8th Cir. 2003) (per curiam)-2- (defendant who received 10-year prison sentence could not challenge conviction or sentence on appeal because he acknowledged that, by pleading guilty, he was subjecting himself to statutory minimum penalty of 10 years imprisonment); United States v. Dabney , 367 F.3d 1040, 1044 (8th Cir. 2004) (holding a district court’s refusal to grant a downward departure is unreviewable unless based on an unconstitutional motive or an erroneous belief it lacked authority to depart). Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
**EXHIBIT
      32** **.1**




**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




Richard
      D. Bailey, in the capacity of the officer who performs the functions of
      Principal Executive Officer of Conihasset Capital Partners, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the “Registrant”), certifies that:




1.
      The
      Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006
      (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




Date:
                9/1/2006
            
            /s/Richard
                D. BaileyRichard
                D. Bailey
                Chief
                  Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of County Conduit Corp. Sanded Friedland, Respondent; Benjamin Schwartz et al., Appellants. (And Related Actions.)

[852 NYS2d 788]

“The report of a Referee should be confirmed whenever the findings are substantially supported by the record, and the Referee has clearly defined the issues and resolved matters of credibility” *(Thomas v Thomas,*21 AD3d 949, 949 [2005] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *Matter of Smiros v Lopez,*251 AD2d 587 [1998]). Here, the Referee’s findings regarding the value of the subject real property are substantially supported by the record and will not be disturbed.

The appellants’ remaining contention is without merit. Spolzino, J.P., Florio, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
Nos. 333-34019, 333-01019, 333-52199, 333-133389 and 333-133391 on Form S-8 of our reports dated April 24, 2007 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Calgon Carbon Corporation and our report on the
effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting dated April 24, 2007 (which expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness) appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Calgon Carbon Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005.



|                        
|------------------------
|Deloitte & Touche LLP   
|                        
|Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
|                        
|April 24, 2007