alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

      KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that each individual whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Richard Siskind and Leonard Plavin, and
each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents with full power
of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead in any and all
capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Stage II Apparel Corp. for
the year ended December 31, 1998 (the "Report") and any amendments thereto, and
to file same, with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done to
comply with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all
requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their
or his substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.


Dated:  March 26, 1999


                                       /s/ Richard Siskind
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Richard Siskind


                                       /s/ Robert Greenberg
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert Greenberg


                                       /s/ Barry Fertel
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Barry Fertel


                                       /s/ Beverly Roseman
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Beverly Roseman


                                       /s/ Jon Siskind
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Jon Siskind


                                       /s/ Leonard Plavin
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Leonard Plavin
SCPW-14-0000381

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

ANTHONY P. LOCRICCHIO, Petitioner,

vs.

THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, ACTING CHIEF DISCIPLINARY

COUNSEL CHARLENE M. NORRIS, Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the January 26, 2014 petition for

a writ of mandamus submitted by Petitioner attorney Anthony P.

Locricchio, this court concludes nothing in the petition or the

attached exhibits supports the conclusion that the Office of

Disciplinary Counsel has violated a duty owed this court, or

abused the discretion delegated to it by this court to

investigate the allegations of misconduct lodged against the

Petitioner. See Breiner v. Sunderland, 112 Haw. 60, 64-65, 143

P.3d 1262, 1266-67 (2006); In re Disciplinary Bd. of the Hawai#i

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-14-0000381

30-JAN-2014

02:53 PM
Supreme Court, 91 Hawai#i 363, 368-71, 984 P.2d 688, 693-96

(1999); Akinaka v. Disciplinary Bd. of the Hawai#i Supreme Court,

91 Hawai#i 51, 57, 979 P.2d 1077, 1083 (1999). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of

mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 30, 2014.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
1

The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Western District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-1999

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

John Cogbill, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: February 10, 2005

Filed: February 16, 2005 

___________

Before BYE, RILEY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After John Cogbill (Cogbill) pled guilty to possessing cocaine base with intent

to distribute, the district court1

 sentenced him–in accordance with his plea agreement–

to the mandatory statutory minimum of 120 months imprisonment. See 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(b)(1)(A). Cogbill appeals. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a

brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Having carefully reviewed the

record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues.

See United States v. Reyes-Contreras, 349 F.3d 524, 525 (8th Cir. 2003) (per curiam)
-2-

(defendant who received 10-year prison sentence could not challenge conviction or

sentence on appeal because he acknowledged that, by pleading guilty, he was

subjecting himself to statutory minimum penalty of 10 years imprisonment); United

States v. Dabney, 367 F.3d 1040, 1044 (8th Cir. 2004) (holding a district court’s

refusal to grant a downward departure is unreviewable unless based on an

unconstitutional motive or an erroneous belief it lacked authority to depart).

Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 30, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00364

- CR

Joe William MEURET, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The State /s

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- CRD

- 07

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee ’s Mo tion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellee’s brief

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to November 30, 2015.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Rumaldo Solis Jr.

400 E Gravis

PO Drawer 1061

San Diego, TX 78384 David D. Towler

Law Office of David D. Towler

410 E. Collins

P.O. Box 569

San Diego, TX 78384

- 2908
EXHIBIT 31.1



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, Charles Driscoll, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Viscorp, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



---

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date: November 12, 2007















/s/ Charles Driscoll







Charles Driscoll









President and Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Alphonse Riley-James, Appellant, v P. David Soares, as District Attorney of Albany County, Respondent.

[825 NYS2d 151]

*1172Crew III, J.

Appeal from judgment of the Supreme Court (Malone, Jr., J.), entered July 19, 2005 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying petitioner’s Freedom of Information Law request.

In 1988, petitioner was convicted in Albany County of various crimes, including two counts of murder in the second degree *(People v Riley-James,*168 AD2d 740 [1990], *lv denied*77 NY2d 966 [1991]). In 2004, petitioner requested from respondent’s office copies of any documents pertaining to promises made or funds given to witnesses at his trial and any documents pertaining to proposed plea agreements *(see*Public Officers Law art 6 [hereinafter FOIL]). Respondent ultimately denied petitioner’s request and a FOIL appeals officer declined to compel disclosure. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the denial. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.

Pursuant to FOIL, government documents are presumptively available for inspection and copying unless they are statutorily exempt by Public Officers Law § 87 (2) *(see Matter of Fappiano v New York City Police Dept.,*95 NY2d 738, 746 [2001]). None of the requests at bar appears to come within any of the statutory exemptions. Moreover, while respondent contends in his brief that the materials requested were provided to petitioner’s then defense counsel, we note that the affidavit submitted on his behalf in opposition to petitioner’s application provides only that petitioner “has failed ... to come forward with an adequate showing that the records requested are no longer available through [his] criminal defense counsel.” This is far from a sworn assertion that the requested materials indeed were turned over to defense counsel and certainly fails to demonstrate, through documentary proof, that copies of such documents were previously furnished to defense counsel *(see Matter of Khatibi v Weill,*8 AD3d 485 [2004]). Accordingly, based upon the papers submitted by respondent in opposition to the petition, we believe that Supreme Court should have granted the application.

*1173Cardona, EJ., Mercure, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, and petition granted to the extent that respondent is directed to provide the requested documents to petitioner.
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regal Rock, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

   1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:  July 13, 2007


/s/ Bruce Biles
-------------------------------------------
Bruce Biles, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Marketing Acquisition Corporation
File No. 0-52072

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 -
                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Marketing  Acquisition  Corporation
(Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report),  I, Glenn A.
Little, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  adopted  as  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Dated: October 31, 2006                        By: /s/ Glenn A. Little
       ----------------                           ------------------------------
                                                                 Glenn A. Little
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Marketing Acquisition  Corporation and will be retained by Marketing
Acquisition  Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
II 

Calendar No. 96 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1328 

To designate foreign persons who improperly interfere in United States 

elections as inadmissible aliens, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 6, 2019 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. GRASSLEY, 

and Mr. LEAHY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

MAY 22, 2019 

Reported by Mr. GRAHAM, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate foreign persons who improperly interfere in 

United States elections as inadmissible aliens, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defending Elections 

5 against Trolls from Enemy Regimes Act’’ or ‘‘DETER 

6 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1328 RS

1 SEC. 2. DEFINED TERM. 

2 Section 101(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

3 Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)) is amended by adding at the end 

4 the following: 

5 ‘‘(53) The term ‘improper interference in a 

6 United States election’ means conduct by an alien 

7 that— 

8 ‘‘(A)(i) violates Federal criminal, voting 

9 rights, or campaign finance law; or 

10 ‘‘(ii) is under the direction of a foreign 

11 government; and 

12 ‘‘(B) interferes with a general or primary 

13 Federal, State, or local election or caucus, in14 cluding— 

15 ‘‘(i) the campaign of a candidate; and 

16 ‘‘(ii) a ballot measure, including— 

17 ‘‘(I) an amendment; 

18 ‘‘(II) a bond issue; 

19 ‘‘(III) an initiative; 

20 ‘‘(IV) a recall; 

21 ‘‘(V) a referral; and 

22 ‘‘(VI) a referendum.’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1328 RS

1 SEC. 3. IMPROPER INTERFERENCE IN UNITED STATES 

2 ELECTIONS. 

3 (a) INADMISSIBILITY.—Section 212(a)(3) of the Im4 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)) is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(H) IMPROPER INTERFERENCE IN A

7 UNITED STATES ELECTION.—Any alien who a 

8 consular officer, the Secretary of Homeland Se9 curity, the Secretary of State, or the Attorney 

10 General knows, or has reasonable grounds to 

11 believe, is seeking admission to the United 

12 States to engage in improper interference in a 

13 United States election, or who has engaged in 

14 improper interference in a United States elec15 tion, is inadmissible.’’. 

16 (b) DEPORTABILITY.—Section 237(a) of the Immi17 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1227(a)) is amend18 ed by adding at the end the following: 

19 ‘‘(8) IMPROPER INTERFERENCE IN A UNITED

20 STATES ELECTION.—Any alien who has engaged, is 

21 engaged, or at any time after admission engages in 

22 improper interference in a United States election is 

23 deportable.’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 96 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1328 

A BILL 

To designate foreign persons who improperly interaliens, and for other purposes. fere in United States elections as inadmissible 

MAY 22, 2019 

Reported without amendment 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlantis BusinessDevelopment Corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year endingDecember 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the"Report"), I, Tim DeHerrera, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section135)), that to my knowledge:

1)    The        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the        Company.

 

***/s/ Tim DeHerrera       ***

Tim DeHerrera, CEO
#### Pauline IM; Sitha Ngin, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-70027.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed April 11, 2008.

Emmanuel Enyinwa, Law Office of Emmanuel Enyinwa, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Blair T. O’Connor, Donald E. Keener, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: B. FLETCHER, EUGENE E. SILER, JR.,** HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 Michael B. Mukasey is substituted for his predecessor, Alberto R. Gonzales, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

ORDER

The Opinion filed August 13, 2007, appearing at 497 F.3d 990 (9th Cir.2007), is withdrawn. Further consideration of this appeal pends the Supreme Court’s decision in *Negusie v. Mukasey,*No. 07-499, — U.S. —, 128 S.Ct. 1695, — L.Ed.2d —, 2008 WL 695623 (U.S. March 17, 2008), or further order of this court. It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit.
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  CERTIFICATION  I, Harley B. Kaplan, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of RathGibson, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation;  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.   Date:  December 12, 2007/s/ Harley B. KaplanHarley B. KaplanPresident and Chief Executive Officer