alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.34



 EXHIBIT 10.34 
 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO 
 THE MOODY’S CORPORATION RETIREMENT ACCOUNT 

The Moody’s Corporation Retirement Account (amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2007) is hereby amended as follows, effective at
the times specified below: 
 1. The reference in Section 8.2(g) to “section 1.401(a)(9)-6T of the Treasury regulations” is
revised to read “1.401(a)(9)-6 of the Treasury regulations”, effective as of January 1, 2003. 
 2. The first three sentences of
Section 15.1(d)(ii)(A) are replaced with the following, effective as of January 1, 2008: 
 a Member’s benefit that is payable in a
form other than a straight life annuity and that is subject to Section 417(e)(3) of the Code shall be converted into the form of an annual retirement benefit which is provided in the form of a straight life annuity, as follows. If the annuity
starting date is in a Plan Year beginning after 2005, the converted amount shall equal annual amount of the straight life annuity commencing at the same annuity starting date that has the same actuarial present value as the Member’s form of
benefit, using whichever of the following produces the greatest annual amount: (x) the interest rate and the mortality table otherwise used under the Plan for adjusting benefits in the same form; (y) a 5.5% interest rate and the applicable mortality
table; and (z) the applicable interest rate under Section 417(e)(3) of the Code and the applicable mortality table, divided by 1.05. If the annuity starting date is in a Plan Year beginning in 2004 or 2005, the converted amount shall equal the
annual amount of the straight life annuity commencing at the same annuity starting date that has the same actuarial present value as the Member’s form of benefit payable, using whichever of the following produces the greater annual amount: (xx)
the interest rate and the mortality table or other tabular factor used under the Plan for adjusting benefits in the same form; and (yy) a 5.5% interest rate and the applicable mortality table. In determining the actuarially equivalent straight
life annuity for a benefit form other than a nondecreasing annuity payable for a period of not less than the life of the Member (or, in the case of a qualified pre-retirement survivor annuity, the life of the surviving spouse), or decreases during
the life of the Member merely because of (a) the death of the survivor annuitant (but only if the reduction is not below 50% of the annual benefit payable before the death of the survivor annuitant), or (b) the cessation or reduction of Social
Security supplements of qualified disability payments (as defined in Section 401(a)(11) of the Code, the interest rate as set forth in Section 1.2 of the Plan will be substituted for “a 5.5% interest rate” in the preceding sentence.

 3. The reference to “separation from service” in Section 17.3(g) is revised to read “severance from employment”,
effective as of January 1, 2002. 

  

			
	MOODY’S 2012 10-K
Case 2:11-cv-00630-DMC -JAD Document 6 Filed 03/18/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 24
Case 2:11-cv-00630-DMC -JAD Document 6 Filed 03/18/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 25
#### In the Matter of Craig K., Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 903]

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 7, Craig K. appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an amended order of disposition of the Family Court, Nassau County (Grella, J.), dated October 25, 2005, as, upon his admission that he violated the terms and conditions of a prior order of disposition of the same court dated December 20, 2004, placed him in the custody of the Commissioner of the Department of Social Services of Nassau County for a period of one year.

Ordered that the amended order of disposition is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Nassau County, for a dispositional hearing and a determination thereafter.

Based on the petitioner’s concession, we remit this matter to the Family Court, Nassau County, for a dispositional hearing and a determination thereafter. Adams, J.E, Goldstein, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Market Data Consultants, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended August 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Wilson Cheung, President and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Wilson Cheung



Wilson Cheung, President and Chairman

December 6, 2006
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                                           |        |                                                                                                 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                           |   |                                                                                                 |   |
| Date: November                  14,                  2007 | By:    | /s/ Paul                S. Lipschutz                                                            |   |
|                                                           |   | Paul                S. Lipschutz                                                                     |   |
|                                                           |   | Chief Executive                  Officer and President(Principal                  Executive Officer) |   |
|                                                           |   |                                                                                                 |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1291 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1291

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a reduced excise 
     tax rate for portable, electronically-aerated bait containers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 2, 2019

    Mr. Rubio (for himself and Mr. Scott of Florida) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a reduced excise 
     tax rate for portable, electronically-aerated bait containers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fishing Equipment Tax Relief Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. THREE PERCENT RATE FOR PORTABLE, ELECTRONICALLY-AERATED BAIT 
              CONTAINERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 4161(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5) and by 
inserting after paragraph (3) the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) 3 percent rate for portable, electronically-aerated 
        bait containers.--In the case of portable, electronically-
        aerated bait containers, paragraph (1) shall be applied by 
        substituting `3 percent' for `10 percent'.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to articles sold by the manufacturer, producer, or importer after 
December 31, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
Case 3:11-cv-00864-MLC-DEA Document 6 Filed 03/31/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 30
Case 3:11-cv-00864-MLC-DEA Document 6 Filed 03/31/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 31
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Susser Holdings Corporation (the Company) for the three months ended March 29,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mary E. Sullivan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 8, 2009

/s/ Mary E. SullivanMary E. SullivanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
2010 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

11-16-2010 

# C o a s t al Out do or Ad

ve r t i sin g Gr v

. T o w nshi p of E a s t H a no ve r

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al

D ock e t N o . 09-3242

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2010

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2010 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du

. R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" C o as t al Out door Adv e r t i sin g Gr v . T o w n ship of Eas t H a no v e r " (2010). 2010 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 254. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2010/254

### NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________
No. 09

- 3242

_____________ COASTAL OUTDOOR ADVERTISING GROUP, LLC, Appellant

v.

TOWNSHIP OF EAST HANOVER, NEW JERSEY

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey No. 2

- 07

- cv

- 04330 District Judge: Honorable Katharine S. Hayden

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) September 20, 2010

Before: McKee, Chief Judge , Ambro and Cha gares, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED , that the slip opinion filed in this case on October

14, 2010, be amended as follows:

On pages 1

- 2, the sentence, “We are asked to review the district

court’s grant of summary judgmen t in favor of Coastal Outdoor Advertising
Group in its action against East Hanover Township,” should be changed to

read as follows: “We are asked to review the district court’s grant of

### summary judgment in favor of the Township of East Hanover in an action

brought by Coastal Outdoor Advertising Group, L.L.C.”

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT,

/s/ Theodore M. McKee Chief Judge

DATED: November 16, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1313

SISAY AWRARIS BELETE,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: October 18, 2011 Decided: November 7, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alan M. Parra, LAW OFFICE OF ALAN M. PARRA, Silver Spring, 

Maryland, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney 

General, Shelley R. Goad, Assistant Director, Russell J.E. 

Verby, Senior Litigation Counsel, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for 

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sisay Awraris Belete, a native and citizen of 

Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the Immigration 

Judge’s denial of his applications for relief from removal. 

Belete first challenges the determination that he 

failed to establish eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal 

of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien 

“must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that 

no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear 

of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 

(1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and Belete’s 

claims and conclude that Belete fails to show that the evidence 

compels a contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, 

Belete cannot meet the more stringent standard for withholding 

of removal. Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); 

INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Finally, we 

uphold the finding below that Belete failed to qualify for 

protection under the Convention Against Torture. 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1208.16(c) (2011). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Ortega, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 845]

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court’s *705determination designating him a level two sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and therefore should not be disturbed *(see*Correction Law § 168-n [3]; *People v Imperato,*45 AD3d 659 [2007]; *People v Bula,*41 AD3d 569 [2007]). Miller, J.P., Covello, Eng and Chambers, JJ., concur.
902 A.2d 930

#### IN THE MATTER OF MATTHEW B. BERNHARD, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 007911996).

August 9, 2006.

ORDER

MATTHEW B. BERNHARD of HOBOKEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1997, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MATTHEW B. BERNHARD is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by MATTHEW B. BERN-HARD pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court for good cause shown and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys.

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 26, 2021

No. 04-21-00303-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.N.L., A CHILD

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019PA01830

Honorable Linda A. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

 Appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file her brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s 

brief is due on or before September 13, 2021.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of August, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT
23.1














Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








The Board
of Directors


RehabCare
Group, Inc.:





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement Nos.
333-160574, 333-162406, and 333-163074 on Form S-3 and Nos. 33-67944, 33-82106,
33-82048, 333-11311, 333-120005, and 333-138628 on Form S-8 of RehabCare Group,
Inc. (the Company) of our report dated March 8, 2010, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2009 and
2008, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income,
changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2009, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which report appears in the
December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of the Company.





The
Company acquired Triumph HealthCare Holdings, Inc. (Triumph) on November 24,
2009, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the
Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009,
Triumph's internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets
of $648.8 million and total revenues of $39.7 million included in the
consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2009.  Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control
over financial reporting of Triumph.





Our
report refers to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes (included in FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes), effective
January 1, 2007, the adoption of FASB Financial Accounting Standard No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51(included
in FASB ASC Topic 810-10-45, Noncontrolling Interests in a
Subsidiary), effective January 1, 2009, and the adoption of FASB
Financial Accounting Standard No. 141(R), Business Combinations
(included in FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations),
effective January 1, 2009.





/s/ KPMG
LLP





St.
Louis, Missouri


March 8,
2010
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of WaterPure International, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Robert F. Orr, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to WaterPure International,
Inc. and will be retained by WaterPure International, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  November
      19, 2008
            By:/s/ ROBERT F.
      ORRRobert
      F. OrrChief
      Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

**SONUS NETWORKS,INC.**

**SUBSIDIARIESOF THE REGISTRANT**

| **Name**                                      | ** ** | ** **     | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** | ** ** | ** ** |
|-----------------------------------------------|------------|----------------|------------|-----------------------------------|------------|------------|
| Sonus  International, Inc.               |       | Delaware       |
| Sonus Securities  Corporation                 |       | Massachusetts  |
| telecom  technologies, inc.                   |       | Texas          |
| Sonus Networks  Limited                       |       | United Kingdom |
| Sonus Networks  Pte. Ltd.                     |       | Singapore      |
| Nihon Sonus  Networks K.K.                    |       | Japan          |
| Westford Networks  Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. |       | Mexico         |
| Sonus Networks  GmbH                          |       | Germany        |
| Sonus Networks  EURL                          |       | France         |
| Sonus Networks  India Private Limited         |       | India          |
| Sonus Networks  (HK) Limited                  |       | Hong Kong      |
| Sonus Networks  s.r.o.                        |       | Czech Republic |
| Sonus Networks  Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.            |       | Malaysia       |
| Zynetix Limited                               |       | United Kingdom |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coronado Corp. (the "Company") onForm 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alejandro Quesada,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the7th day of August, 2007.

/s/ Alejandro Quesada

_______ 

Chief Executive Officer

----

 

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coronado Corp. (the "Company") onForm 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shawn Phillips, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in              all material respects, the financial condition and result of              operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the7th day of August, 2007.

/s/ Shawn Phillips

___

Chief Financial Officer
cc: Eighth Judicial District Court Dept. 20 

Mueller Hinds & Associates 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) I947A .016flp