alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                    CONSULTING AND NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT


         This Second  Amendment to  Consulting  and  Non-Competition  Agreement,
entered into this 1st day of August,  1997, by and between HERFF JONES, INC., an
Indiana corporation (the "Company"),  and A.J. HACKL (the "Consultant"),  amends
the  Consulting  and  Non-Competition  Agreement  between  the  Company  and the
Consultant  dated June 1, 1995, as amended by the First  Amendment to Consulting
and  Non-Competition  Agreement  dated  September 11, 1996 (the  "Consulting and
Non-Competition Agreement").

         WITNESSETH THAT:

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Consultant entered into the Consulting and
Non-Competition Agreement; and

         WHEREAS,  the parties  hereto have concluded that it is in their mutual
best  interest  to modify  the  provisions  thereof  with  respect to the annual
compensation of the Consultant;

         NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration of these premises and of the mutual
agreements herein contained, it is agreed as follows:


         1.       Paragraph 5(a) of the Consulting and Non-Competition Agreement
                  shall be, and it hereby is, amended as follows:

         (a) Consulting Fees.  Beginning August 1, 1997, the Consultant shall be
         paid a consulting  fee during the Term of $24,000 per year (the "Fee"),
         which Fee shall be paid in equal monthly  installments  of $2,000.  The
         Fee shall not be subject to any deductions or withholdings,  for tax or
         other purposes, by the Company.

         2. Except as modified by this Agreement,  all of the rights,  terms and
conditions  in the  Consulting  and  Non-Competition  Agreement,  as  heretofore
amended, shall remain in full force and effect.



                            [signature page follows]
<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  parties  have  executed  this  Amendment  to
Consulting and Non-Competition Agreement as of the date first above written.



                                               HERFF JONES, INC.


                                           By: /s/ James W. Hubbard
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               James W. Hubbard, Chief Executive
                                                  Officer & President


                                               CONSULTANT

                                               /s/ A.J. Hackl
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               A.J. Hackl
#### HINDLEMAN v. SPECIALTY SALESMAN MAGAZINE, Inc., et al.

No. 738.

District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

Jan. 26, 1940.

WOODWARD, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves to strike certain portions of defendants’ answer. The motion must be allowed as to Paragraphs 9(A) to 104, both inclusive. From a mere inspection of the answer it is obvious that these paragraphs, together with the voluminous exhibits accompanying the answer, is a gross violation of Rules 8(b) and (e) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. fol*279lowing section 723c. No discussion is necessary to support this conclusion.

The court has heretofore overruled the defenses at law set up in Paragraphs 1(a) do (G), both inclusive.
Exhibit 31.1 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I,
Laurence Moskowitz, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Medialink Worldwide
Incorporated;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 c)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
      annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Date:
March 30, 2005
 
 /s/
Laurence Moskowitz
 Name:
Laurence Moskowitz
 Title:
Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 130 (Thursday, July 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 32945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, August 6, 2009, 1 p.m. to 
August 6, 2009, 4 p.m., Sheraton Delfina Hotel, 530 West Pico 
Boulevard, Santa Monica, CA, 90405 which was published in the Federal 
Register on June 8, 2009, 74 FR 27156-27160.
    The meeting has been changed to a telephone conference at the 
National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 
20892. The meeting date and time remain the same. The meeting is closed 
to the public.

    Dated: June 30, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-16116 Filed 7-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62676) pertaining
to the Westcorp 2001 Stock Option Plan, and in the related
prospectus of our report dated January 20, 2004, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Westcorp and subsidiaries
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

| |                                    
| | -----------------------------------
| | Ernst & Young LLP
ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 10, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 32647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16138]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLNVC02000.L57000000.BX0000; 9-08807; TAS: 14X5017]


Temporary Closure of Public Lands in Washoe County, NV

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Closure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 43 CFR 8364.1 certain public lands near Stead, 
Nevada, will be temporarily closed to all public use. This action is 
being taken to provide for public safety during the 2009 Reno National 
Championship Air Races.

DATES: Effective Dates: Closure to all public use September 12 through 
September 20, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Kelly, Sierra Front Field Office 
Manager at (775) 885-6118.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This closure is authorized under the 
provisions of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 43 
U.S.C. 1701 et. seq. This closure applies to all public use, including 
pedestrian use and vehicles. The public lands affected by this closure 
are described as follows:

Mount Diablo Meridian, Nevada

T. 21 N., R. 19 E.,
    Sec. 8, N\1/2\NE\1/4\, SE\1/4\NE\1/4\, E\1/2\SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 16, N\1/2\, SE\1/4\.
    The area described contains 680 acres, more or less.

    Exceptions: Closure restrictions do not apply to event officials, 
medical/rescue, law enforcement, and agency personnel monitoring the 
events.
    Penalties: Any person who fails to comply with this closure order 
is subject to arrest and, upon conviction, may be fined not more than 
$1,000 and/or imprisonment for not more than 12 months.

(Authority: 43 CFR 8360.0-7 and 8364.1)

Bryant Smith,
Associate Manager, Carson City District.
[FR Doc. E9-16138 Filed 7-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P
Case 2:11-cv-01522-JLL-CCC Document 4 Filed 03/21/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 41
Case 2:11-cv-01522-JLL-CCC Document 4 Filed 03/21/11 Page 2 of 8 PageID: 42
Case 2:11-cv-01522-JLL-CCC Document 4 Filed 03/21/11 Page 3 of 8 PageID: 43
Case 2:11-cv-01522-JLL-CCC Document 4 Filed 03/21/11 Page 4 of 8 PageID: 44
Case 2:11-cv-01522-JLL-CCC Document 4 Filed 03/21/11 Page 5 of 8 PageID: 45
Case 2:11-cv-01522-JLL-CCC Document 4 Filed 03/21/11 Page 6 of 8 PageID: 46
Case 2:11-cv-01522-JLL-CCC Document 4 Filed 03/21/11 Page 7 of 8 PageID: 47
Case 2:11-cv-01522-JLL-CCC Document 4 Filed 03/21/11 Page 8 of 8 PageID: 48
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Repot on form 10-K of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, HassanM. Ahmed, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 2, 2007 |   | /s/ HASSAN M.  AHMED                                                                            |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Hassan M. Ahmed                                                                                 |
|                      |   | *Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board  of Directors (Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

----
MARTIN T. McDONOUGH, M.D., J.D. 

Attorneys at Law 

13 West Avenue, Suite A
 

P.O. Box 303
 

Woodstown, New Jersey 08098
 

EMILY A. McDONOUGH, ESQ.* Telephone (856) 769-2470 

emily@mcmedlaw.com Facsimile (856) 769-9290 

*Member ofNJ and PA Bar 

February 10,2012 

J/1A E-FILING 

Karen M. Williams, United States Magistrate Judge
 

Mitchell H. Cohen Building & U.S. Courthouse
 

4th and Cooper Streets
 

Camden, NJ 08101
 

RE:	 Bechard v. United States
 

Civil Action No. 11-00048 (JHR) (KMW)
 

Dear Judge Williams: 

1.	 I am pleased to report to Your Honor that the above matter has settled. 

2.	 Plaintiff respectfully requests a Distribution Hearing as required by the New Jersey 

Wrongful Death Act, specifically N.J.S.A. 2A:31-4. 

3.	 Plaintiff will submit papers and a proposed Distribution Order in advance ofthe 

Distribution Hearing. 

4.	 Pursuant to an Order dated December 5, 2011, the parties were to engage in a telephone 

status conference with the Court on February 22,2012 at 10:00 a.m. That conference can 

now be dispensed with if Your Honor agrees. 

5.	 I will await notification from the Court regarding the date ofthe Distribution Hearing. 

Thanking you I remain, 

MTM/sb 

CC:	 Elizabeth A. Pascal, Esq. (via regular mail) 

Beth Bechard (via regular mail) 

Case 1:11-cv-00048-JHR-KMW Document 12 Filed 02/11/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 86
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Defentect Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the
undersigned’s knowledge, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August
      13, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      James C. AckerlyJames
      C. Ackerly, Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
Case 2:10-cv-04017-SDW -MCA Document 38 Filed 11/17/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 691
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. 

Marc Silver, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

OMNICARE, INC., PHARMERICA 

CORPORATION, CHEM RX 

CORPORATION, NCS HEALTHCARE, 

INC. AND NEIGHBORCARE, INC., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01326-ESK-AMD 

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal entered by Relator Marc Silver (“Relator”) and 

Defendant PharMerica Corporation (“PharMerica”), together with the Consents to Dismissal 

filed by the United States, the District of Columbia, and the states of California, Colorado, 

Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, 

Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, Nevada, New Jersey, New 

Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and 

Wisconsin, and the Court having considered these submissions; 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice 

as to the United States, the District of Columbia, and the states of California, Colorado, 

It is on this __3rd__ day of _________July__________, 2024, 

ORDERED that this action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as to Relator. 

Case 1:11-cv-01326-ESK-AMD Document 807 Filed 07/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 32953
Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, 

Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, Nevada, New Jersey, New 

Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and 

Wisconsin 

/s/ Edward S. Kiel . Edward S. Kiel 

United State District Judge 

Case 1:11-cv-01326-ESK-AMD Document 807 Filed 07/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 32954
PCX_EX10.60_2012.12.31






EXHIBIT 10.60


AMENDMENT NO. 5
TO THE PATRIOT COAL CORPORATION
SUPPLEMENTAL 401(k) RETIREMENT PLAN




WHEREAS, the Patriot Coal Corporation (the “Company”) previously adopted the Patriot Coal Corporation Supplemental 401(k) Retirement Plan (the “Plan”);


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 12.1 of the Plan, the Company reserves the right to amend the Plan, by a resolution adopted by action of the Board of Directors of the Company; and


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan as set forth herein;


NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of the date hereof, the Company amends the Plan by adding the following Section 12.3 thereto:


12.3    Suspension of Elections and Distributions.


Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, no Participant shall be permitted to make any election to defer Compensation under the Plan for any Plan Year that begins after December 31, 2012.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment is hereby executed as of this 28th day of December, 2012.




PATRIOT COAL CORPORATION


By:    /s/ JOSEPH W. BEAN              
Joseph W. Bean
Exhibit 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-148663, Form S-8 No. 333-142963, Form S-8 No. 333-119616, Form S-8 No. 333-160535 and Form S-8 No. 333-168123) of GigaMedia Limited of our report dated
April 30, 2013, on the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting of GigaMedia Limited, which appears on pages F-1 and F-2 in this annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ GHP Horwath, P.C.
|                     
|Denver, Colorado     
|April 30, 2013       



1
Swift code: CITISGSGGCB”3. Effect of Amendment. Except as expressly modified in this Amendment, all other termsand conditions contained in the Subscription Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.Except as expressly provided herein, nothing in this Amendment will be construed as a waiver ofany of the rights or obligations of the parties under the Subscription Agreement.4. Representations and Warranties. Each party hereto represents and warrants to the otherparty hereto that this Amendment has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by it andconstitutes a valid and legally binding agreement with respect to the subject matter containedherein.5. Notices. Clause 13 (Notices) of the Subscription Agreement is hereby incorporated intothis Amendment by this reference.6. Governing Law and Jurisdiction. Clause 16 (Governing Law and Jurisdiction) of theSubscription Agreement, as replaced by this Amendment, is hereby incorporated into this Amendmentby this reference.7. Entire Agreement. This Amendment contains the entire agreement among the parties withrespect to the subject matter of this Amendment and supersedes and extinguishes all prioragreements and understandings, oral or written, with respect to such matter.8. Third Party Contract Rights. Unless otherwise expressly provided to the contrary inthis Amendment, a person who is not a party to this Amendment has no right under the Contracts(Rights of Third Parties) Act, Chapter 53B of Singapore to enforce or to enjoy the benefit of anyterm of this Amendment.
 
- 2 -

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this Amendment effective as of the date setforth above.     **INFOCOMM ASIA HOLDINGS PTE. LTD.**     By:       Name:    Title:       **GIGAMEDIA ASIA PACIFIC LIMITED**     By:       Name:    Title:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

RICKY COLEMAN,

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Criminal No. 07-143 (SRC)

ORDER

CHESLER, District Judge

This matter having come before the Court on the motion filed pro se by Defendant Ricky

Coleman (“Coleman”) for the Court to order that he be provided with a copy of his sentencing

transcript at public expense; and it appearing that the Court had appointed Coleman counsel

pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act (“CJA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; and it appearing that the CJA

provides for reimbursement of the costs of transcripts authorized by the Court; and it appearing

that Coleman states that he needs his sentencing transcript to prepare an appeal; therefore,

IT IS on this 20 day of December, 2012, th

ORDERED that Coleman’s motion for the provision of a copy of his sentencing

transcript at public expense [docket entry 338] is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that the Court Reporter shall furnish the sentencing transcript as early as

practicable. 

 s/Stanley R. Chesler 

STANLEY R. CHESLER

United States District Judge

Case 2:07-cr-00143-SRC Document 345 Filed 12/21/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1816
Case 2:11-cv-01576-KM-MAH Document 79 Filed 05/31/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 2385
Case 2:11-cv-01576-KM-MAH Document 79 Filed 05/31/13 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 2386
Case 2:11-cv-01576-KM-MAH Document 79 Filed 05/31/13 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 2387
Case 2:11-cv-01576-KM-MAH Document 79 Filed 05/31/13 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 2388
Case 2:11-cv-01576-KM-MAH Document 79 Filed 05/31/13 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 2389
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20784 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OSVALDO BIOJOS-DE LA CRUZ, also known as Orlando Santiago Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CR-66-1

- - - - - - - - - - July 27, 1998 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Osvaldo Biojos-De La Cruz has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Biojos-De La Cruz has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.No. -2-