alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                        FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                  5,797,000
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                          23,772,000
<ALLOWANCES>                            2,113,000
<INVENTORY>                            17,696,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       47,994,000
<PP&E>                                 44,150,000
<DEPRECIATION>                         28,118,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         86,764,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  44,636,000
<BONDS>                                 2,892,000
<COMMON>                                2,677,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     1
<OTHER-SE>                             36,180,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           86,764,000
<SALES>                                94,949,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       94,949,000
<CGS>                                  60,379,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          60,379,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       46,514,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      1,144,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (13,388,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (13,388,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                          (13,388,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (1.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0
        



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

MR. ADOLPHUS DOWNS, :

Civil Action No. 10-3158 (WJM)

Petitioner, :

v. : O R D E R

DONALD MEE, et al., :

Respondents. :

On or about June 21, 2010, Petitioner filed the instant

application for writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254, and an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

Based upon Petitioner’s affidavit of indigence,

IT IS on this 6th day of July, 2010,

ORDERED that Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma

pauperis is hereby granted.

 s/William J. Martini

 

WILLIAM J. MARTINI

United States District Judge

Case 2:10-cv-03158-WJM Document 3 Filed 07/06/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 105
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission of Fine Arts

The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for 16 July 2009, at 10 a.m. in the Commission offices at the National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include buildings, parks and memorials.

                    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission are available on our Web site:                     *http://www.cfa.gov.*                     Inquiries regarding the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address or call 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.                

Dated 26 June 2009 in Washington, DC.

Thomas Luebke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-15634 Filed 7-1-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
Exhibit 10.(d)

 

FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

TRANSFER AGENT AGREEMENT

 

This First Amendment to Transfer Agent Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2013 (this “Amendment”), is between Ameriprise Certificate Company (the “Company”) and Columbia Investment Services Corp. (f/k/a RiverSource Service Corporation) (the “Transfer Agent”), and amends the Transfer Agent Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2006 (the “Agreement”), between the Company and the Transfer Agent.

 

WITNESSETH:

 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Transfer Agent are parties to the Agreement; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Transfer Agent desire to amend the terms of the Agreement as set forth herein.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

 

(1)         Schedule A to the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by Schedule A hereto.

 

(2)         This Amendment may be executed by the parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original but all of which taken together will constitute one and the same instrument.

 

(2)         Except to the extent amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

 

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]

 

1











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.

 

 

	
AMERIPRISE   CERTIFICATE COMPANY
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   Abu M. Arif
    	
 
    
	
Name:   Abu M. Arif
    	
 
    
	
Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
COLUMBIA   MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT SERVICES CORP.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   Steve Welsh
    	
 
    
	
Name:   Steve Welsh
    	
 
    
	
Title:   President
    	
 
    


 

2











 

Schedule A

 

COMPENSATION TO TRANSFER AGENT

 

For services provided under this Agreement, the Transfer Agent shall be paid the fees and costs described in Section I of this Schedule.  Section 2 of this Schedule describes computation, invoicing and payment terms.

 

1. Compensation Items

 

a. Fees. The Transfer Agent shall be paid a monthly fee for each month during the term of this Agreement in an amount equal to one-twelfth of $26.00 per certificate owner account maintained by the Transfer Agent under this Agreement.  For these purposes, the number of certificate owner accounts in a month shall be an average of the number of such accounts on the first and last days of the month.

 

b. Effective Period; Material Changes. The fees set out in this Schedule shall be effective until the parties agree otherwise.

 

2. Computation, Invoicing and Payment Terms

 

Each month, the Transfer Agent shall prepare an invoice setting forth the amount payable by the Company under this Agreement.  The fees described herein shall be paid by the Company monthly in arrears within five (5) business days after receipt by the Company of the invoice for such month.

 

3
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Severo ESCOBAR-GARZON, IV, a.k.a. Junior, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-10529

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Nov. 29, 2012.

Sally Yates, George Jeffrey Viscomi, Assistant U.S. Attorney Lawrence R. Sommerfeld, Ryan Scott Ferber, Sandra Elizabeth Strippoli, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert Alan Glickman, Attorney at Law, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Severo Escobar-Garzon, IV, McRae, GA, pro se.

Before WILSON, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Alan Glickman, appointed counsel for Severo Escobar-Garzon, IV, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record *885reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Escobar-Garzon’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

GLOBAL SIGNAL ACQUISITIONS LLC

and GLOBAL SIGNAL ACQUISITIONS

IV LLC,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NASSAU BROADCASTING HOLDINGS

INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 11-597 (JAP)

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court by way of Defendants Nassau Broadcasting

Holdings Inc., Nassau Tower Holdings LLC, and Nassau Tower Realty LLC’s (“Defendants”)

Motion to Vacate the Settlement [Docket Entry No. 20]; and the parties having requested an

adjournment of the November 8, 2012 hearing because they are engaged in settlement discussions

that may resolve the issues presented in the motion; and the Court noting that the hearing had been

adjourned on a previous occasion to allow counsel to resolve the dispute amicably see [Text Entry

No. 32]; and for good cause shown,

IT IS on this 7 day of November, 2012, th

ORDERED that the Clerk’s Office shall administratively terminate the motion located at

Docket Entry No. 20; and it is further 

ORDERED that if the parties are unable to resolve the dispute, Defendants may file a new

notice of motion referencing the supporting and opposing documents already electronically filed. 

LOIS H. GOODMAN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:11-cv-00597-JAP-LHG Document 34 Filed 11/07/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 654
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Michael Vardakis, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report (the Report) on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:5/14/07By:/s/Michael VardakisMichael VardakisPresident and Director
Starz_Exhibit 10.18_12.31.2012




Exhibit 10.18
TERM SHEET
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement for 
Christopher Albrecht (“Executive”)


This term sheet describes the proposed amendments to Executive’s Employment Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2010, between Starz, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Executive, as such agreement was amended on December 7, 2012 (the “Employment  Agreement”).  Except as listed below, the material terms of the Employment Agreement will continue in effect.


	
		
	Position:
	Chief Executive Officer of Starz, a Delaware corporation (“Starz”).  Executive will report to the Chairman of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Starz and to the Board.  Executive will be based in Los Angeles.

	Term:
	January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2016, unless sooner terminated (the “Term”).



	Compensation:
	Base annual salary of $1.25 million plus target bonus equal to 100% of base salary based on corporate and individual performance criteria to be determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board.  Executive to receive the lesser of (i) 18 months’ payment of base and target bonus or (ii) payment of base and target bonus through the end of the Term, if Executive is terminated without Cause or if Executive terminates his employment for Good Reason (as that term is defined below), with the structure of such payments being subject to compliance with applicable tax law.

	Equity Awards:
	Executive will be granted options to purchase shares of Series A Liberty Capital common stock of Starz (“STRZA”) as follows:
•    A one-time grant of options on shares of STRZA equal to $26 million Black-Scholes value.  The exercise price per share of such options will be equal to the closing price of STRZA on the grant date.  Fifty percent of the options will vest on December 31, 2015, and fifty percent of the options will vest on December 31, 2016.  The expiration date of the options will be ten years from grant date.
•    Other terms of the options will be the same as the terms of the options in the Employment Agreement except as noted below:
o    Upon termination by Starz other than for Cause (as originally defined in the Employment Agreement) or by the Executive for Good Reason (as defined in the Employment Agreement, but amended to require a double trigger in a change of control event), options granted to Executive will be deemed to have vested in a number equal to the product of (i) the total number of unvested options multiplied by (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is the total number of days elapsed in the Term to the date of termination plus 548 days and the denominator of which is the total number of days in the full Term.  Such vested options will remain exercisable to the end of their original term.

	Spin-Off Matters:
	The Employment Agreement will be amended to reflect certain matters related to the January 2013 Liberty Media/Starz spin-off and to update certain historical references and issues.





1
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0389 

_____________________________

DINO RAY REAVES, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie M. Kinsey, Judge.

May 14, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, M.K. THOMAS, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Dino Ray Reaves, Jr. pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Consumer Expenditure Survey

CNSTAT Panel Briefing

Ideas for Change: New Designs 

& Data Collection Technologies

Adam Safir

Division of Consumer Expenditure Survey, BLS

February 8, 2011
 Individual diaries

 Mixed-mode

 One instrument, diary or interview

 One sample, multiple instruments

 Online interview

 Semi-structured interview

 Split questionnaire methods

 Supplemental use of administrative data

New Design Possibilities
New Data Collection Technologies

 New modes

e.g., online diary interviews

 New interviewing platforms

e.g., PDAs, smart phones, tablets

 New data capture devices

e.g., financial software, receipt scanners

3
EXHIBIT 31.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Ellen B. Richstone, Chief Financial Officer, of Sonus Networks, Inc., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004 ("Amendment") of Sonus Networks, Inc.; and

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this Amendment does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Amendment.

|Date: April 29, 2005 |  |                                                                                              
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/ELLEN B. RICHSTONEEllen B. Richstone Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

---



QuickLinks
#### TROUNSTINE v. BAUER, POGUE & CO., Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

June 26, 1940.

Joseph Rilander, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Benjamin P. DeWitt, of New York City, for defendant Bauer, Pogue & Co., Inc.

Sidney Pepper, of New York City, for defendant Frederick R. Bauer.

KNOX, District Judge.

This motion for a bill of particulars is denied. The information here sought should be obtained, not by way of a bill of particulars, but by interrogatories, Rule 33, Rules of Civil Procedure for District Courts, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, or by deposition, Rule 26. As is said by Holtzoff in his book entitled “New Federal Procedure and the Courts,” page 36: “While the pertinent provision] of Rule 12(e) states that such a motion may be made to enable the moving party ‘properly to prepare his responsive pleading or to prepare for trial,’ the phrase ‘to prepare for trial’ is not given separate effect from that accorded to the preceding part of the sentence. Obviously, if such a motion is appropriate only before joinder of issue, it seems premature to afford to a party opportunity to secure data that may be needed in preparation for the trial but are not required to enable him to plead.”

If plaintiff is fearful that defendants may resort to perjury in answering interrogatories or in giving depositions, that fear, so far as I can see, will not be allayed through their responses to the demands of a bill of particulars.
Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Annual Report of RADVision Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gad
Tamari, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Gad Tamari*
--------------
Gad Tamari
Chief Executive Officer
March 30, 2003


* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
Case 2:11-cv-00930-CCC-MF Document 10 Filed 06/06/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 169
Case 2:11-cv-00930-CCC-MF Document 10 Filed 06/06/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 170
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Sonus Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, Ellen B. Richstone, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)         the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: March 13, 2006 |     | /s/ ELLEN B.  RICHSTONE                                     |
|---------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |     | Ellen B. Richstone                                          |
|                      | * * | *Chief Financial Office (Principal Financial Officer)* |

 

----