alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2008
    /s/  RYUJI UENORyuji Ueno, M.D., Ph.D., Ph.D.Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
PACTS Number: 45356

Name of Sentencing Judicial Officer: Honorable Robert N. Chatignv

Name of Assigned Judicial Officer: Honorable Stanley R. Chesler

Date of Original Sentence: 12/28/2006

Original Offense: tittering Counterfeit Obligations or Securities

Original Sentence: 24 months imprisonment; 3 years supervised release. Special conditions: mental health

treatment; substance abuse treatment: no new debt; linancial disclosure. Restitution of $1 424.9 I

Type of SupervisIon: Supervised Release Date Supervision Commenced: 5/8/09

Assistant U.S. Attorney: Daniel Shapiro. 970 Broad Street. Room 502 Newark, New Jersey 07102(973)

645-2700

Defense Attorney: David Holman, 1002 Broad Street, Newark, New Jersey 07102, (973) 645-6347

PETITIONING THE COURT

[X j To issue a warrant

[ 1 To issue a summons

The probation officer believes that the offender has violated the following condition(s) of supervision:

Violation Number ttir P Noncom fiance

The offender has violated the standard supervision condition ‘ hich states ou

shall not commit another federal, state, or local crime.’

The offender, while under the supervision of the District of New Jersey. was arrested on new criminal charges and subsequently pled guilty to such charges. receiving a new federal sentence.

Specifically, on May 15.2012. the offender was sentenced in the Middle District

of Pennsylvania by- the I lonorable Edwin \1. Kosik on two counts of Stealing Blank Money Order Forms tinder the Authority ofthe Postal Service. 1 8 U.S.C.

§ 500. lIe received an I 8month term of imprisonment, on each count, to be

served concurrently. Special conditions include: DNA testing: no new debt; financial disclosure: apply all monies received from anticipated or unexpected financial gains to the outstanding court—ordered financial obligation: substance abuse treatment: mental health treatment. Restitution of $8,550.78.
17t The issuance of a Warrant

I The issuance of a Summons. Date of 1-learing: 

J No Action

[ J Other

Date

ignature [icial Ofticer
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    [paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC Release 34-47986];(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  August 21, 2007
    /s/ RYUJI UENORyuji Ueno, M.D., Ph.D., Ph.D.Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 10.23

 

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.

 

Secretary’s Certificate

 

The undersigned, Edward M. Schulman, hereby certifies that he is the Secretary of AvalonBay Communities, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and does further certify as follows:

 

On February 9, 2006, at a duly called and held meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company, the Board adopted the following resolution amending the Company’s 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on December 8, 2004, to adjust the manner in which the number of shares granted to non-employee directors will be calculated each year:

 

Resolved:                 That paragraph 6(b)(i) of the Company’s 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on December 8, 2004, is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

 

Each Non-Employee Director who is serving as a Director of the Company on the fifth business day after the 2006 annual meeting of stockholders shall automatically be granted on such day 1,327 shares of Restricted Stock, which is determined in accordance with the methodology used for determining this automatic grant as in effect under this Plan immediately after the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (i.e., $100,000 divided by $75.35, the closing price of shares of the Company’s Common Stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on May 18, 2005, five business days after the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders). Thereafter, each Non-Employee Director who is serving as a Director of the Company on the fifth business day after each annual meeting of stockholders, beginning with the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, shall automatically be granted on such day a number of shares of Restricted Stock equal to $100,000 based upon the closing price of shares of the Company’s Common Stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on such date (such number to be rounded to the nearest whole number). Except as otherwise provided in the award agreement, such shares of Restricted Stock shall vest twenty percent (20%) on the date of issuance and twenty percent (20%) on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of issuance.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this certificate as of March 1, 2006.

 

	
 
    	
AVALONBAY   COMMUNITIES, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/   Edward M. Schulman
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Edward   M. Schulman
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Secretary
U.S. Railroad Retirement Board Phone: (312) 751-4992

844 North Rush Street TTY: (312) 751-4701

Chicago Illinois, 60611-1275 Web: https://www.rrb.gov/

United States Railroad Retirement Board 

Worksheet for Computing Excess Railroad Retirement Taxes Withheld in 2023

If you worked for two or more employers in 2023, and your total earnings exceeded $118,800, too much tax may 

have been withheld. This worksheet was developed to help you determine and claim credit for the excess taxes being 

collected. If more than the maximum tax was withheld by a single employer, you must contact your employer for a refund. 

There is a new procedure that must be followed to claim excess tax credits from the IRS.

To claim credit for excess Tier I taxes being collected, you must use your 2023 Form 1040 income tax return. To claim 

credit for excess Tier II taxes, being collected, you must submit IRS Form 843. 

1. Add all social security and Tier I RRTA tax shown on Forms W-2 from all employers

(not counting more than $9,932.40 for each employer.) Enter the sum in area 1c.

1a. Amount of Tier I tax 1b. Amount of Tier I tax + = withheld by Employer #1 withheld by Employer #2

1c. Total amount of Tier 

I tax withheld

2. Show Tier I RRTA tax on any unreported tips on Line 5 of IRS

Form 1040 Schedule 2. Also include any uncollected Tier I tax on

group-term life insurance. Uncollected tax (UT) is shown in Item 12

of IRS Form W-2.

2. Total Tier I tax

uncollected

3. Add the amounts shown in areas 1c and 2. Enter the sum in 3. (If

the amount is $9,932.40 or less, enter “0" in box 5 and go to line 6.)

3. Total of 1c and 2

4. Employee 2023 RRTA Tier I tax limit. 4. $9,932.40

5. Subtract line 4 from line 3. Enter the remainder, which is your excess Tier I tax. This is the amount

of tax credit which should be entered on Line 23 of IRS Form 1040.

5.

6. Add Tier II RRTA tax from Forms W-2 from all employers (not counting more than $5,821.20 for

each employer.) Enter the sum in area 6c.

6a. Amount of Tier II tax 6b. Amount of Tier II tax + = withheld by Employer #1 withheld by Employer #2

6c. Total amount of Tier 

II tax withheld 

7. Show Tier II RRTA tax on any unreported tips on Line 5 of IRS

Form 1040 Schedule 2. Also include any uncollected Tier II tax on

group-term life insurance. Uncollected tax (UT) is shown in Item 12

of IRS Form W-2.

7. Total Tier II tax

uncollected

8. Add the amounts in 6c and 7. Enter the sum in 8. If the amount is

$5,821.20 or less, no excess tax has been withheld.

8. Sum of 6c and 7

9. Employee 2023 RRTA Tier 2 tax limit. 9. $5,821.20 

10. Subtract line 9 from line 8. Enter the remainder, which is your excess Tier II tax. This is the amount

of tax credit which should be entered in item 2 of IRS Form 843.

10.

For updated worksheets, call the Railroad Retirement Board’s Quality Reporting Service Center at (312) 751-4992.

For more information, see IRS publication 505

(Rev. 01/2024)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

 : CRIMINAL 10cr851-7 

v. :

 : ORDER

THOMAS LEONARDIS 

:

The financial inability of the defendant Thomas Leonardis to

retain counsel having been established by the Court, and the

defendant not having waived the appointment of counsel, and

The court having heard the U.S. Attorney(s) concerns about

the qualifications of such appointment; and

for good cause shown; 

It is on this 4th day of October, 2001, 

O R D E R E D that Michael Pedicini, Esq is hereby ordered

to remain as appointed counsel to represent defendant Leonardis

in this case until further order of the Court; and

Further ORDERED that if defendant does in fact have assets

which are discovered after trial, defendant will be required to

reimburse the government for the cost of counsel.

 S/DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH 

DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH

United States District Judge

cc: United States Attorney
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K OF DIGITAL MICROWAVE
CORPORATION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          21,518
<SECURITIES>                                     5,745
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,514
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,261
<INVENTORY>                                     50,610
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               153,962
<PP&E>                                          98,250
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,225
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 202,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,715
<BONDS>                                          1,896
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           621
<OTHER-SE>                                     130,592
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   202,164
<SALES>                                        236,499
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               236,499
<CGS>                                          223,232
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  223,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               109,414
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,608
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 479
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (96,122)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       607
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (96,729)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (96,729)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.57)


</TABLE>
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 17

- 00329

- CR

GARY L. TYSON, SR.

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 278th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 27985

O R D E R

The State's motion entitled "Motion for Leave to File Appellee's Supplemental

Letter Brief in Support of Appellee's Brief" was filed on April 5, 2019. The motion is

granted to the extent that the tendered letter brief was filed with this Court on April 5,

2019.

PER CURIAMTyson v. State Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Motion granted

O rder delivered and filed April 17, 2019
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Stephen G. Hoffmann and Jonathan J. Wick certify as
follows:

1. They are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Canyon Bancorp.

2. The Form 10-Q of Canyon Bancorp, for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2008, complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Canyon Bancorp.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Stephen G. Hoffmann
|                      |  | Stephen G. Hoffmann    
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      | 
|Date: August 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Jonathan J. Wick   
|                      |  | Jonathan J. Wick       
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 26, 2020

NO. 03-18-00381-CR

Crispin James Harmel, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in 

the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE

This matter having been opened to the Court by Paul 3. Fishnian, United States Attorney for

the District of New Jersey (Jonathan W; Romankw, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing), anddefendant FRANCESCO “FRANK” GUARRACI (JohnP. McDonald, Esq., appeaiing), for an ordergranting a continuance ofthe proceedings in the above-captioned matter; and the defendant being

aware that he has the right under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b) to have the matter brought to trial withinseventy (70) days ofthe date ofhis appearance before ajudicial officer ofthis court pursuant to Title

18 U.S.C. 3161; and the defendant through his attorney having waived such rights and consented

to the continuance; and for good and sufficient cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF TH1S COURT that this action should be continued for the

following reasons:

1. A trial date of October 12, 2010 has been set in this matter, however, plea

negotiations are currently in progress, and both the United States and the defendant desire

additional time to finalize a plea agreement, which would render trial ofthis matter

wmecessary.

2. Defendant has consented to the aforementioned continuance.

3. The grant of a continuance Will likely conserve judicial resources.

4. Pursuant to Title 18 ofthe United States Code, Section 3161(hXl)(A), the ends

ofjustice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests ofthe public and the
20jI; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period from August 30, 2010, through

NO’J€XYiJ2 20jshall be excludable in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of

1974, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Seetlo 31 61(hyx). J

United States Dis Judge

-

Form and entiyconsented to:

%L.

O?ATHAN ROMANKOW

systant U.S. Attorney 

,OHN P. MCDONALD, Esq,

V()for Defendant Francesco Guarraci
Exhibit 32.01





CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Paul S. Lipschutz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of WaterPure International, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of WaterPure International, Inc.





By:

/s/    PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZDate: November 22, 2010

Name:

Paul S. LipschutzTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




I, Robert F. Orr, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of WaterPure International, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of WaterPure International, Inc.







By:

/s/    ROBERT F. ORRDate: November 22, 2010

Name:

Robert F. OrrTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

MIKHAIL BULATOV, :

Civil Action No. 11-845 (FSH)

Petitioner, :

v. : ORDER

ROY L. HENDRICKS, et al., :

Respondents. :

This matter was originally opened to this Court by

Petitioner’s filing of a Petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

This matter is presently before the Court pursuant to

Petitioner’s submission of a Motion [4] for Default Judgment.

IT APPEARING THAT:

Petitioner submitted his Motion for Default Judgment prior

to this Court ordering service of the Petition or ordering

Respondents to Answer. Accordingly, at the time the Motion for

Default Judgment was filed, Respondents were under no obligation

to have answered the Petition. There has been no default.

IT IS, therefore, on this 2nd day of December, 2011,

ORDERED that the Motion [4] for Default Judgment is DENIED.

s/ Faith s. Hochberg 

Faith S. Hochberg

United States District Judge

Case 2:11-cv-00845-FSH Document 19 Filed 12/02/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 457