alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GLG Partners, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/  Emmanuel RomanEmmanuel RomanCo-Chief Executive Officer
RULES GOVERNING STANDARDS OF CONDUCT 

OF MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JUDGES

Preamble

***

(8) The [Ethics Committee of the Pennsylvania Conference of State Trial Judges 

and the Ethics and Professionalism Committee of the Special Court Judges 

Association of Pennsylvania are] Pennsylvania Judicial Ethics Advisory Board is

designated as the approved [bodies] body to render advisory opinions and general 

guidance regarding ethical concerns involving magisterial district judges and judicial 

candidates subject to the Conduct Rules. [Although such opinions are not, per se, 

binding upon the Judicial Conduct Board, the Court of Judicial Discipline or the 

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, a] Action taken in reliance thereon and pursuant 

thereto shall be [taken into account] treated as set forth in Rules 103 and 206 of 

the Pennsylvania Judicial Ethics Advisory Board in determining whether discipline 

should be recommended or imposed. [It is anticipated that ethical concerns 

directed to the Ethics Committee of the Pennsylvania Conference of State Trial 

Judges would be limited to matters more appropriately before that body, e.g., 

campaigning for election to the court of common pleas or an appellate court.]

***
EXHIBIT 31.1  SECTION 302 PRESIDENT CERTIFICATION  FORM OF CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE  I, Alex Ferries, the President of Wrap-N-Roll USA, Inc., certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Wrap-N-Roll USA, Inc. (the registrant) 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) (omitted in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986); c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Dated: 9/12/2007 /s/ Alex Ferries Alex Ferries President and Director
DANIEL ALEXANDER CHRISTIAN

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 3649

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 21, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Clay County

. Don H. Lester , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, MAKAR, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

| (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated:  November | 13, 2006 | By: /s/ Michael McChesney |
|------------------|----------|---------------------------|

 

|   | Michael McChesney |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B) OF THE
                    SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C.1350

The undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63
of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his or her capacity as an officer of Lotus
Bancorp, Inc., that, to his or her knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Lotus
Bancorp, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in such reports fairly represents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Lotus
Bancorp, Inc. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-QSB. A signed original of this
statement has been provided to Lotus Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Lotus
Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

Date: November 10, 2006


/s/ Satish B. Jasti
-------------------------------------
Satish B. Jasti
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Richard E. Bauer
-------------------------------------
Richard E. Bauer
Chief Financial Officer


                                       21
Case 2:11-cv-00942-SDW-MCA Document 2 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 30
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  August 21, 2007
    /s/ RONALD W. KAISERRonald W. KaiserChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Prime Resource,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2005,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Mr. Terry
M. Deru, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15
         (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

DATE: March 31, 2006



By: /s/ Steve Levin
--------------------------------------
Steve Levin, Chief Executive Officer
Case 3:11-cv-00716-PGS-DEA Document 2 Filed 03/22/11 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 12
Case 3:11-cv-00716-PGS-DEA Document 2 Filed 03/22/11 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 13
Case 3:11-cv-00716-PGS-DEA Document 2 Filed 03/22/11 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 14
Case 3:11-cv-00716-PGS-DEA Document 2 Filed 03/22/11 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 15
#### OHIO CASUALTY INS. CO. v. MALONEY et al.

No. 2366.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania, E. D.

Jan. 28, 1943.

*342Henry S. Ambler, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs and third-party defendant Keystone Dairies, Inc.

A. Archer Cross, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant

GANEY, District Judge.

This is a motion to bring in a third-party defendant in the above mentioned case. The plaintiff by bill in equity filed a complaint asking that a decree be entered that a certain policy of insurance did not insure one of the defendants, Joseph W. Maloney, for injuries or damages as the result of an accident happening in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, wherein a truck owned by the Keystone Dairies Company, Inc., the third-party defendant sought to be brought on the record, was involved in a collision with two other automobiles resulting in injuries and damages to the other defendants whose names are set forth in the complaint Certain of the defendants filed an answer and a counterclaim wherein, in the latter, claims against Keystone Dairies Co., Inc., for certain money judgments, for injuries allegedly received as a result of the carelessness and negligence of the said Joseph W. Maloney while in the employ and on the business of the Keystone Dairies Company, Inc., were pleaded.

This, as has been indicated, is a motion to bring in the Keystone Dairies Company, Iñc., as a third-party defendant with the right to serve upon it a summons and third-party complaint. The sole question raised here is whether or not the defendants can file a counterclaim in their answer making it in reality a third-party plaintiff which counterclaim is a legal action, when the original bill as here is one in equity. An examination of Rule 13 under the Federal Rules, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, convinces me, especially 13(a), that it is compulsory on the defendant to plead a legal as well as an equitable counterclaim “if it arises out of a transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party’s claim”. I think it can fairly be said that the transaction or occurrence set forth in the counterclaim is of the subject matter of the plaintiff’s bill. It would indeed be an extremely narrow construction of Rule 13(a) to hold that only-equitable claims should be made the subject matter of counterclaims when the original' action is -in equity. It may be, in tire disposition of the equity claim, that the whole-matter can be determined and if not the action at law may then be proceeded with, as it would be in the interest of avoiding a multiplicity of suits to have the whole matter disposed of in one set of pleadings, and at one time, which is the end sought to be attained under the Federal Rule. Union Central Life Insurance Company v. Burger et al., D.C., 27 F.Supp. 554; Beaunit Mills, Inc., v. Eaday Fabric Sales Corporation, *2*Cir., 124 F.2d 563, and notes page 566.

Motion allowed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1275

In re: KHALEEL ALI HILLIARD

 Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(Nos. 1:06-cr-00156-NCT-1; 1:08-cv-00870-NCT-DPD)

Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: July 27, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Khaleel Ali Hilliard, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Khaleel Ali Hilliard petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking 

an order directing the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle 

District of North Carolina to respond to his motion to amend his 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We conclude that Hilliard is not 

entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only 

in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 

U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 

516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available 

only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. 

In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 

1988).

The relief sought by Hilliard is not available by way of 

mandamus because the Government was not ordered by the district 

court to respond to Hilliard’s motion to amend his § 2255 motion.* 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

 * We note that the § 2255 motion, the Government’s motion to 

dismiss, and Hilliard’s motion to amend were referred to the 

magistrate judge on January 31, 2014, and no action has been taken. 

However, Hilliard’s petition sought relief only from the U.S. 

Attorney’s Office.
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WILBERT HOLLINS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-2525

[October 12, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Cheryl A. Caracuzzo, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-1989-CF-008105-AXXX-MB.

Wilbert E. Hollins, Indiantown, pro se. 

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., WARNER, and LEVINE, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 1 of 33 PageID: 122
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 2 of 33 PageID: 123
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 3 of 33 PageID: 124
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 4 of 33 PageID: 125
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 5 of 33 PageID: 126
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 6 of 33 PageID: 127
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 7 of 33 PageID: 128
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 8 of 33 PageID: 129
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 9 of 33 PageID: 130
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 10 of 33 PageID: 131
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 11 of 33 PageID: 132
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 12 of 33 PageID: 133
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 13 of 33 PageID: 134
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 14 of 33 PageID: 135
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 15 of 33 PageID: 136
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 16 of 33 PageID: 137
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 17 of 33 PageID: 138
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 18 of 33 PageID: 139
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 19 of 33 PageID: 140
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 20 of 33 PageID: 141
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 21 of 33 PageID: 142
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 22 of 33 PageID: 143
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 23 of 33 PageID: 144
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 24 of 33 PageID: 145
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 25 of 33 PageID: 146
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 26 of 33 PageID: 147
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 27 of 33 PageID: 148
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 28 of 33 PageID: 149
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 29 of 33 PageID: 150
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 30 of 33 PageID: 151
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 31 of 33 PageID: 152
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 32 of 33 PageID: 153
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC -MAS Document 8 Filed 01/13/11 Page 33 of 33 PageID: 154
ACU	ACURA
AUD	AUDI 
BMW	BMW 
BUI	BUICK 
CAD	CADILLAC 
CHE	CHEVROLET 
CHR	CHRYSLER 
DAW	DAEWOO
DOD	DODGE 
EAG	EAGLE 
FOR	FORD 
GEO	GEO
GMC	GMC 
HON	HONDA 
HUM	HUMMER
HYU	HYUNDAI
INF	INFINITI
ISU	ISUZU 
JAG	JAGUAR 
JEE	JEEP 
KIA	KIA 
LAN	LAND ROVER
LEX	LEXUS 
LIN	LINCOLN 
MAS	MASERATI
MAY	MAYBACH
MAZ	MAZDA
MRB	MERCEDES-BENZ 
MEC	MERCURY 
MEK	MERKUR
MIN	MINI
MIT	MITSUBISHI 
NIS	NISSAN 
OLD	OLDSMOBILE 
PLY	PLYMOUTH 
PON	PONTIAC 
POR	PORSCHE 
SAA	SAAB 
SAT	SATURN 
SCI	SCION
SUB	SUBARU 
SUZ	SUZUKI
TOY	TOYOTA 
VOK	VOLKSWAGEN 
VOV	VOLVO 
XXX	UNSPECIFIED MAKE
An unpublisijed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

FREEDOM MORTGAGE | No. 67898
CORPORATION, |
Appellant,
vs.
ZAISAN ENTERPRISES LLC, FILE D
Respondent.
JUL 27 2065

TRACIE K. LINDEMAN
CLERKOF SUPREME COURT
SS ee a
DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Cause appearing, appellant’s motion for a voluntary dismissal
of this appeal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. NRAP 42(b).
It is so ORDERED.

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT

TRACIE K. LINDE! Wh L

cc: Hon, James Crockett, District Judge
Malcolm Cisneros
S. Wolfe Thompson
Eighth District Court Clerk

‘Supreme Court
OF
NEVADA

CLERK’S ORDER

_ (0y1987 oi

1§-2256S
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Baoshinn Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending December 31, 2007, I, Ricky Chiu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. The Report, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  February 8, 2008 Baoshinn Corporation By: /s/ Ricky Chiu Ricky Chiu  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Baoshinn Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending December 31, 2007, I, Benny Kan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. The Report, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  February 8, 2008 Baoshinn Corporation By: /s/ Benny Kan Benny Kan
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

EQUITY ALLIANCE, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED COMPANIES, LLC, UNITED 

REAL ESTATE GROUP, LLC

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: 

:

Civil Action No. 10-3998 (SDW)(MCA)

ORDER

March 6, 2012

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of 

United States Magistrate Judge Madeline C. Arleo filed on January 24, 2012, regarding Plaintiff 

Equity Alliance, LLC’s (“Equity”) motion for judgment enforcing the settlement agreement. No 

objections have been filed.1

The Court has reviewed the R&R, the brief, and the other documents on file in this 

matter. Based on the foregoing, and for good cause shown,

IT IS on this 6th day of March, 2012,

ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Arleo’s R&R filed on January 24, 2012, is 

ADOPTED by this Court in its entirety. Equity’s motion for judgment enforcing the settlement 

agreement is DENIED.

s/ Susan D. Wigenton 

Susan D. Wigenton, U.S.D.J.

 1 Objections were due by February 7, 2012. 

Case 2:10-cv-03998-SDW-MCA Document 30 Filed 03/07/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 99
cc: Madeline Cox Arleo, U.S.M.J.

Case 2:10-cv-03998-SDW-MCA Document 30 Filed 03/07/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 100
Case 1:11-cr-00137-NLH Document 2 Filed 03/04/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 10
Case 2:11-cr-00101-JLL Document 3 Filed 02/28/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 6
Case 2:11-cr-00101-JLL Document 3 Filed 02/28/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 7