alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Mark K. Silver

COUGHLIN DUFFY LLP

350 Mt. Kemble Avenue

P.O. Box 1917

Morristown, NJ 07962

(973) 267-0058

Robert R. Vieth (Of Counsel)

Erin M. Watkins (Of Counsel)

COOLEY LLP

One Freedom Square – Reston Town Center

11951 Freedom Drive

Reston, Virginia 20190

(703) 456-8000

Attorneys for Animal Welfare Institute

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

____________________________________

)

NADINE HEMY and NANCY CONNER, )

individually and on behalf of themselves )

and all others similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action No.: 3:11-cv-00888-FLW-LHG

)

v. ) ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE’S

) NOTICE OF MOTION TO

PERDUE FARMS, INC., ) INTERVENE AND STAY

ABC CORPORATIONS 1 through 10 )

and JOHN DOES 1 through 10, ) (Document Filed Electronically)

)

Defendants. )

)

TO:

David M. Wacksman Edward P. Boyle

777 Terrace Avenue Michael C. Hartmere

Third Floor Venable LLP

Hasbrouck Heights, NJ 07601 Rockefeller Center

1270 Avenue of the Americas

Twenty-Fifth Floor

New York, NY 10020

Case 3:11-cv-00888-MAS-LHG Document 18 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 283
366302_1

Jonathan K. Tycko

Jeffrey D. Kaliel

Tycko & Zavareei LLP

2000 L Street, N.W.

Suite 808

Washington, DC 20036

Kathryn J. Levy

The Humane Society of the United States

2100 L Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20037

Liza M. Walsh

Rukhsanah L. Lighari

Connell Foley LLP

85 Livingston Avenue

Roseland, NJ 07068

Roger A. Colaizzi

David D. Conway

Venable LLP

575 7th Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20004

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on September 6, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. or as soon thereafter

as counsel may be heard, the undersigned counsel for Animal Welfare Institute (“AWI”) shall

move in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for an Order allowing

AWI to intervene in this matter and staying this case for sixty days.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that in support of this motion, the undersigned

relies on the accompanying Memorandum of Law in Support of Animal Welfare Institute’s

Motion to Intervene and Stay.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Oral Argument is requested if this motion is

opposed.

Dated: August 4, 2011 Respectfully submitted,

/s/Mark K. Silver

Mark K. Silver, Esq.

COUGHLIN DUFFY LLP

350 Mt. Kemble Avenue

P.O. Box 1917

Morristown, NJ 07962

Telephone: (973) 267-0058

Facsimile: (973) 267-6442

msilver@coughlinduffy.com

Case 3:11-cv-00888-MAS-LHG Document 18 Filed 08/04/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 284
366302_1

Robert R. Vieth (Of Counsel)

Erin M. Watkins (Of Counsel)

COOLEY LLP

11951 Freedom Drive

Reston, Virginia 0190-5656

Telephone: (703) 456-8000

Facsimile: (703) 456-8100

rvieth@cooley.com

eestevez@cooley.com

Counsel for Animal Welfare Institute

Case 3:11-cv-00888-MAS-LHG Document 18 Filed 08/04/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 285
**Exhibit      32.1 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|                                        |   |                                                                                                                                                                        |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                November 14, 2006 |   | /s/                MICHAEL C. LEE                                                                                                                                           |
|                                        |   | Michael                C. Lee                                                                                                                                               |
|                                        |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal                Executive Officer and PrincipalAccounting                Officer) of ZipGlobal Holdings, Inc. |
|                                        |   |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350



(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the annual report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce A. Williamson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                                          
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |    
|Date: January 25, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/    BRUCE A.
WILLIAMSON                               
|                       |  |     |  | Bruce A. Williamson President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dynegy Holdings Inc. and will be retained by Dynegy Holdings Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 29, 2015

a0921 

# Order

Clerk September 29, 2015

150509(23)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150509

COA: 323479

Genesee CC: 08

- 023349

- FH

HAROLD ARMSTEAD JOHNSON

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 28, 2015

order is considered, and it is DENIE D, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Capital Resources, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John
Quandahl, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ John
      QuandahlJohn
      QuandahlChief
      Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial OfficerAugust
      13, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of All American Pet Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Victor Hollander, CFO and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





3.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





4.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/S/ Victor HollanderVictor HollanderCFO andPrincipal Accounting OfficerMay 24, 2010
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Nos. 12-3456, 12-3457 and 12-4629

In re: NUTELLA MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION

 *JANIS JOHNSON,

 Appellant in case No. 12-3456.

 

*(Pursuant to Rule 12(a), Fed. R. App. P. and Court Order dated 05/28/14) 

IN RE: NUTELLA MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION

*AGATHA BOCHENEK; *BRANDON GOODMAN; *EDWARD HAGELE,

 Appellants in case No. 12-3457

*(Pursuant to Rule 12(a), Fed. R. App. P.) 

IN RE: NUTELLA MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION

*JANIS JOHNSON,

 Appellant in case No. 12-4629

*(Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 12(a)) 

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(District Court No.: 3-11-cv-01086)

District Court Judge: Honorable Freda L. Wolfson

Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 148 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 2467
2 

Submitted under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) 

September 11, 2014 

Before: RENDELL, GREENAWAY, JR. and SLOVITER, Circuit Judges 

JUDGMENT

These cases came on to be heard on the record from the United States District 

Court for the District of New Jersey and were submitted under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) 

on September 11, 2014. 

On consideration whereof, 

IT IS ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this Court that the Judgments of the 

District Court entered July 31, 2012, and November 20, 2012, be and the same, are 

hereby, AFFIRMED. 

Costs taxed against appellants. 

All of the above in accordance with the Opinion of this Court. 

ATTEST: 

s/ Marcia M. Waldron

Clerk of Court 

Dated: September 29, 2014 Costs taxed in favor of Appellees

as follows:

Brief........................ $183.40

Sup. Appendix...... $504.00

__________________________

TOTAL................... $687.40

11/12/2014

Case 3:11-cv-01086-FLW-DEA Document 148 Filed 11/12/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2468
#### MUSTANG OIL COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff, v. CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM COMPANY et al., Defendants. HARMON OIL COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff, v. LUTZ YELTON OIL COMPANY, Inc., et al., Defendants.

Nos. 2453, 3207.

United States District Court, W. D. North Carolina, Charlotte and Asheville Divisions.

March 26, 1971.

Carpenter, Golding, Crews & Meekins, Charlotte, N. C., Arthur E. Moers, Jr., Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs.

James H. Kelley, Bergson, Borkland, Margolis & Adler, Washington, D. C., A. Ward McKeithen, Fleming, Robinson & Bradshaw, Ernest S. DeLaney, Jr., Bradley, Gebhardt, DeLaney & Millette, Charlotte, N. C., Robert W. Yelton, N. Dixon Lackey, Jr., Whisnant & Lackey, Shelby, N. C., John Graybeal, Hollabaugh, Jacobs & Ward, Washington, D. C., and W. T. Covington, Jr., Kennedy, Covington, Lobdell & Hickman, Charlotte, N. C., for defendants.

ORDER

McMILLAN, District Judge.

Defendants have moved for summary judgment, contending that certain releases made by the plaintiffs on May 26, 1970, to various co-defendants were general in nature and, because no express reservation of rights against other defendants were made in those releases, that all alleged joint tortfeasors are discharged from liability.

In a recent case (like this, an antitrust suit), the United States Supreme Court in considering a fact situation materially indistinguishable from the one presented here concluded:

> «* * * The straightforward rule is that a party releases only those other parties whom he intends to release * * * ” Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., 401 U.S. 321, 91 S.Ct. 795, 28 L.Ed.2d 77 (1971).

The Court specifically rejected the common-law rule (release of one joint tortfeasor necessarily releases all others *even if*it expressly reserves rights against them) and termed the First Restatement rule (release of one joint tortfeasor releases all others jointly liable unless the release *expressly*reserves rights against joint tortfeasors) a “trap for unwary plaintiffs’ lawyers.” The *Zenith Radio*decision effectively reverses the leading lower court case on the question, Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Winchester Drive-In Theatre, Inc., 351 F.2d 925 (9th Cir. 1965) and requires a trial court to find as fact the intentions of the released and releasing parties.

On their face, the releases involved in this case appear to release only those individual defendants mentioned in each *208release. Moreover, there is considerable deposition evidence (e. g. Caudle deposition, pages 8, 9) that there was in fact the specific intention by both parties to the releases, that rights against other possible tortfeasors would be preserved and asserted.

This court is of the opinion that in this anti-trust case the rule of Zenith v. Hazeltine should be followed (see, Dice v. Akron C. & Y. R. Co., 342 U.S. 359, 72 S.Ct. 312, 96 L.Ed. 398 (1952) and Miami Parts and Spring, Inc. v. Champion Spark Plug Co., 402 F.2d 83 (5th Cir., 1968)) and that since there is a material dispute as to the fact of intent, the motion for summary judgment should be and it is hereby denied.
#### In the Matter of Neil M. Siskind, Petitioner, v Courtney A. Schael, Appellant. Roberta Nancy Kaufman, Nonparty Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 436]

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Jaeger, J), dated October 18, 2005, which, after a hearing, found her in contempt for her willful failure to comply with a prior order of the same court dated October 6, 2005, directing her to pay her share of the Law Guardian’s fee, and ordered her incarceration.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court properly found the mother in contempt, and ordered her incarceration, for failing to pay her share of the Law Guardian’s fee as directed in an order of the same court dated October 6, 2005 *(see*Family Ct Act § 156; Judiciary Law § 753 [A]). There was no dispute that the mother failed to pay the Law Guardian. Proof of noncompliance with the order established a prima facie case of criminal contempt, shifting the burden to the mother to establish good cause for noncompliance, thereby negating the inference of wilfulness *(see Ferraro v Ferraro,*272 AD2d 510 [2000]). Here, the mother had in her possession a bank check for the entire amount owed to the Law Guardian, which belied any claim of an inability to pay *(see Matter of Gerzack v Gerzack,*87 AD2d 612 [1982]). Contrary to her contentions, the Family Court gave the mother a reasonable opportunity to pay the amount owed *(see Stempler v Stempler,*200 AD2d 733 [1994]).

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit.

*807Motion by the nonparty respondent on an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated October 18, 2005, to strike portions of the appellant’s brief on the ground that it raises issues that are not properly before this Court. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated May 11, 2006, the motion was held in abeyance, and referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission of the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the submission of the appeal, it is

Ordered that those branches of the motion which are to strike points III and V of the appellant’s brief are granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the motion is otherwise denied. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Skelos, JJ., concur.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;      and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           | MEPRO      SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                           |                             |   |   |
| Dated:       May 13, 2010 | By:                              | /s/ W. Craig Turner |   |
|                           |                             | W.      Craig Turner |   |
|                           |                             | Chief      Executive Officer |   |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1237 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1237

   To require the Secretary of Defense to modify the Certificate of 
   Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) to include a 
specific block explicitly identified as the location in which a member 
 of the Armed Forces may provide one or more email addresses by which 
                      the member may be contacted.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 30, 2019

Mr. Rounds (for himself and Mr. Cardin) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of Defense to modify the Certificate of 
   Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) to include a 
specific block explicitly identified as the location in which a member 
 of the Armed Forces may provide one or more email addresses by which 
                      the member may be contacted.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``DD-214 Modernization Act''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF SPECIFIC EMAIL ADDRESS BLOCK ON CERTIFICATE OF 
              RELEASE OR DISCHARGE FROM ACTIVE DUTY (DD FORM 214).

    (a) Modification Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall modify 
the Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) 
to include a specific block explicitly identified as the location in 
which a member of the Armed Forces may provide one or more email 
addresses by which the member may be contacted after discharge or 
release from active duty in the Armed Forces.
    (b) Deadline for Modification.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
release a revised Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty 
(DD Form 214), modified as required by subsection (a), not later than 
one year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
0/*

OU)a/

or /Ic

15

gSa6
Va

\i
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

I, Wayne M. Woodruff, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Maverick Bancorporation, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [Intentionally Omitted] for the registrant and we have:
5. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
6. [Intentionally Omitted];
7. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
8. disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
9. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
10. all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
11. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 16, 2006

/S/ Wayne M. Woodruff
Wayne M. Woodruff,
President and Chief Executive Officer
Case 2:10-cr-00437-SRC Document 1 Filed 07/01/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1
Case 2:10-cr-00437-SRC Document 1 Filed 07/01/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2
Exhibit 32.01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kinder Travel Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Aaron
Whiteman
  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
   /s/ Aaron WhitemanBy: Aaron Whiteman
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 1