alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ismna

(&fc£ W.ObA'Z-Contio-tiL

^RECEIVED\

JUL 2 7 2015

THIRD COURTOFAPPEALS

E /

KtottOfi F0C-fe^Afi4V^

oouer op

w£w& ovx^e?#m\^ ito^vu \wmk tSte tte^\>efcw&i bc^ coue \w& G££-

X

Pecitlo^ ft<Lfe\VLOP eai©^, OKtoaUtfte tebVlg.3ft\j3>OW^ NUk \W£ vote &gcop£_

H

$&ita&£b owror ^ fcfc*&eo£ iT^fctece^sio^ -tw^t \r w^, wr\£b in ^ vMisteowmz. w^ N&tfwa uhm3lx$%9w& m\ &&&&>mgxtwxto^ux&&<$- cziojjiwl i^we vfeg£ ,T»£ coocr ce rue H2t^ a^oal ueaacr ras^is \h& k

^^^a^^c^v^vrvw^a^^i tow fc^c^\i^,ct£c^^

at

\£4 s\m 2b %,% (r* "Zo^^^vu w^e^i^ ^vM^wf te^oi^^T^E y$*&* GEW&-

i Or 2-
IT

xm^^^mm m^^-^ uMmM& 9o^v^a^ ^ ce&aLio N&fefeA ea^

^wi^(teuton ^^VB^^muteO£.Gc

'UCMWT

a cez.
OrTgtffc^KCeek MIH U*M SCrVSC^ m UV^^YXV^ b\&C#^£oU ^ Oim S&-

a&f, ovmuAustin \^ M£r ^ T*fe e*^.

<2££>£c^um eofcux^^,
Tfft

3=S
Plaintiffs,

vs. ORDER

GERDAU AMERISTEEL CORP. and JOHN

DOES 1-10.

Defendants.

AND NOW, on this 2day of August, 2013, upon consideration of the Plaintiffs’

Motion for Final Approval of Collective and Class Settlement, for approval of attorney’s fees

and costs, and for approval of service payments to Named Plaintiffs, and upon consideration ofarguments provided by counsel and collective and class members who appeared during the inperson Class Settlement Approval Hearing held on August 22, 2013, for the reasons as stated on

the record, IT IS:

1. ORDERED that the Joint Settlement and Release Agreement (“Settlement

Agreement”) (Doe. No. 4 17-1) is given final approval by this Court; Defendants and

all class members and FLSA collective action members who have not opted out to the

Settlement are bound by the Settlement Agreement;

2. ORDERED that Class Counsel’s fe application fOr reasonable costs and fees in the

amount of 5921500 is approved;

3. ORDERED that Named Plaintiff Charles Murray’s application for a $10,000 service

payment for his services to the class is approved;

4. ORDERED that Named Piaintff Mark Zimmerman’s application for a S5000 service
dismissed with prejudice.

BY I HE C(NKi’:

I Ic I IOflt11[IL Ols I I m I \1J

I) LI
1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SXC Health Solutions Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a15(e) and 15d15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a15(f) and 15d15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: August 7, 2008By:
    /s/ Mark ThiererMark ThiererChief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Javier Arroyo, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 61]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Thomas Farber, J.), rendered February 10, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 10 to 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court’s carefully limited *Sandoval*ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion *(see People v Hayes,*97 NY2d 203 [2002]; *People v Walker,*83 NY2d 455, 458-459 [1994]). The court properly permitted the People to elicit defendant’s federal racketeering conviction, along with certain aspects of its underlying facts, because the probative worth of these matters on the issue of defendant’s credibility outweighed the risk of prejudice.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Defendant is not entitled to the benefit of the reduced penalty contained in the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738), because the Legislature has expressly stated that the provision upon which defendant relies applies only to crimes committed after its effective date *(People v Utsey,*7 NY3d 398 [2006]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Saxe, Marlow, Sullivan and Williams, JJ.
#### Read and others, *executors, &c., against*Patterson.

A defendant has r'iead atterTi/er ®hm’í?ehdead TM 5 dayVoniy of pieadingremain«hen oyer was demanded, the pfeaddfn 5 days after oyer is gi-

*Sampson,*for the defendant, moved to set aside the default, and all subsequent proceedings in this cause. He read an affidavit, stating, that the declaration was served on the defendant, on the 15 th of *February*last; and on the first or second day of *March,*the defendant delivered to the plaintiffs a demand of *over*0f the letters testamentary, &c. On the 26th of *May*fol- <■' i ♦ m i t v lowing, the attorneys of the plaintiffs delivered to the defendant a COpy or *0yer*0f the letters testamentary; and on the 13th of *June*the defendants tendered to the plaintiffs’ attorneys á plea of the general issue, which they refused to receive, saying they had, *329some days before, entered a default against the defendant for Want of a plea.

*Henry,*contra,

objected that the default was regular; that the defendant had the same time to plead, after *oyer*given, as he had at the time he demanded it.* When the demand of *oyer*was made by the defendant, in this case, five days only of the time for pleading remained unexpired; and the plea was not tendered until 18 days after *oyer*was given.

*

*Auki,i!VsTmi Rep'*256'

*Per Curiam.*

The default was regularly entered. It can be set aside only on payment of costs.
#### Herbert Alonzo ROBINSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Sergeant Jill WILSON, a/k/a Wilson; Logan Fey, a/k/a Frye; John Does, in their individual capacity including any and all Jane Does; Michelle Redden, a/k/a Ms. Redden; Sergeant Christine Harrison, a/k/a Sergeant Harrison; Sergeant Brian Duval, a/k/a Sergeant Duval, Defendants-Appellees, *232and Stephanie Singleton, Defendant.

No. 12-7427.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 12, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 18, 2012.

Herbert Alonzo Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Wilcox Buyck, Gordon Wade Cooper, Buyck Law Firm, Charleston, South Carolina; Elloree Ann Ganes, Thomas Happel Scurry, Hood Law Firm, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Herbert Alonzo Robinson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Robinson v. Wilson,*No. 8:11-cv-02285-RB H, 2012 WL 3264874 (D.S.C. Aug. 9, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT 32.1

           CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND THE PERSON
       PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the period  ended
December  31,  2004  (the  "Report")  of  Franklin   Capital   Corporation  (the
"Registrant"),  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof,  I,  Milton  "Todd" Ault III, as the Chief  Executive  Officer,  and the
person  performing the functions as Chief  Financial  Officer of the Registrant,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

      (1) the  accompanying  Form 10-K report for the period ending December 31,
2004 as filed with the U.S.  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the "REPORT")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant.

Dated: March 30, 2005                       /s/ Milton "Todd" Ault III
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Milton "Todd" Ault III
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION

I, Kelly Tucek, Vice President, certify that:

- I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Inland Monthly Income Fund, L.P.;  
- Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  
- Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  
- The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

> - designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
- evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
- disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

- The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

> - all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
- any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Richard Heyse,
certify that:

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innophos Holdings, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided Innophos Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Innophos
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned expressly disclaims any
obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: August 10, 2007



/s/ RICHARD HEYSERichard HeyseVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as a part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION OF                             
|---------------------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                      
|AND                                          
|CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER                      
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Chris Cooper, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Explortex Energy Inc., (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for
      the six months ended October 31, 2006 (the Quarterly Report) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                    

| | By:    |                            
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        | /S/ Chris Cooper           
| | Name:  | Chris Cooper               
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | December 12, 2006          

---
Case 2:07-cr-00143-SRC Document 248 Filed 06/15/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1317
EXHIBIT
32.2


OFFICERS’
CERTIFICATIONS


Certification
of Chief Financial Officer







Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Douglas Emmett, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby
certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:






(i)
            the
      accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
      ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and






(ii)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Dated:
      May 8, 2008
            By:
            /s/
      WILLIAM KAMERWilliam
      KamerChief
      Financial Officer







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 30, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00331-CV

JANIE MILLS, Appellant

V.

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1006381

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 6, 2012. On May 10, 2012, 

this court abated this appeal because appellant petitioned for voluntary bankruptcy 

in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, under 

cause number 12-33010. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. 

Through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system, 

the court has learned that the bankruptcy case was closed August 9, 2012. The 
2

parties failed to advise this court of the bankruptcy court action.

On April 23, 2013, this court issued an order stating that unless any party to 

the appeal filed a motion demonstrating good cause to retain the appeal within 

twenty days of the date of the order, this appeal would be dismissed for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). No response was filed. 

Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal and order it dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison, and Busby.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

Dated: January 12, 2009.

Vicky D'Onofrio,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

 [FR Doc. E9-1619 Filed 1-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roy E. Nelmes, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 392]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), dated March 2, 2012, as, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, •without costs or disbursements.

In establishing a defendant’s risk level pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act *(see*Correction Law art 6-C), “the People bear the burden of establishing the facts supporting the determination sought by clear and convincing evidence” *(People v King,*80 AD3d 681, 682 [2011]; *see*Correction Law § 168-n [3]; Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 5 [2006]). “ ‘[E]vidence may be derived from the defendant’s admissions, the victim’s statements, evaluative reports completed by the supervising probation officer, parole officer, or corrections counselor, case summaries prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders ... or any other reliable source, including reliable hearsay’ ” *(People v Eaton,*
      *684105 AD3d 722, 723 [2013], quoting *People v Crandall,*90 AD3d 628, 629 [2011]; *see*Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 5 [2006]).

Here, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court properly assessed him 15 points under risk factor 11 for a history of alcohol abuse. The assessment of these points was supported by clear and convincing evidence in the record, including the case summary completed by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders and the defendant’s presentence report *(see People v Crandall,*90 AD3d at 629; *People v Harris,*93 AD3d 704, 705 [2012]; *People v Robinson,*55 AD3d 708 [2008]). Accordingly, the County Court properly designated the defendant a level two sex offender. Dickerson, J.E, Chambers, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**




**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**









Richard
      D. Bailey, in the capacity of the officer who performs the functions of
      Principal Executive Officer of Conihasset Capital Partners, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the “Registrant”), certifies that:




1.
      The
      Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007
      (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




Dated: August
                  14, 2007
              /s/
                  Richard D. BaileyRichard
                  D. BaileyChief
                  Executive Officer