Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 130 / Thursday, July 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules 32857 

2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(4). 

Provisions of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to 

this proceeding. Members of the public 

should note that from the time a Notice 

of Proposed Rulemaking is issued until 

the matter is no longer subject to 

Commission consideration or court 

review, all ex parte contacts are 

prohibited in Commission proceedings, 

such as this one, which involve channel 

allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for 

rules governing permissible ex parte 

contacts. 

For information regarding proper 

filing procedures for comments, see 47 

CFR 1.415 and 1.420. 

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 

Television, Television broadcasting. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Federal Communications 

Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR 

part 73 as follows: 

PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST 

SERVICES 

1. The authority citation for part 73 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336. 

§ 73.622(i) [Amended] 

2. Section 73.622(i), the PostTransition Table of DTV Allotments 

under Wisconsin is amended by adding 

DTV channel 5 and removing DTV 

channel 44 at Fond du Lac. 

Clay C. Pendarvis, 

Associate Chief, Video Division, Media 

Bureau, Federal Communications 

Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–16088 Filed 7–8–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL 

DEVELOPMENT 

48 CFR Parts 704, 713, 714, 715, 744, 

and 752 

RIN 0412–AA63 

Partner Vetting in USAID Acquisitions 

AGENCY: United States Agency for 

International Development. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: This document makes 

corrections to the preamble and clause 

of a proposed rule published in the 

Federal Register of June 26, 2009, 

regarding Partner Vetting in USAID 

Acquisitions. This correction corrects 

the fax number provided in the 

ADDRESSES section of the rule and a 

paragraph reference in the definitions 

section of clause 752.204–71. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jennifer Norling, 202–712–1807. 

Corrections 

In proposed rule FR Doc. E9–15012, 

beginning on page 30494 in the issue of 

June 26, 2009, make the following 

corrections: 

1. In the ADDRESSES section, on page 

30494 in the 2nd column, correct the 

Fax number in the third bullet to read 

‘‘Fax: 202–216–3395’’. 

2. In line 2 of the 48 CFR 752.204– 

71(b) definition of ‘‘Vetting Official’’, on 

page 30498 in the 2nd column, correct 

the paragraph reference to read 

‘‘paragraph (d) of this clause’’. 

Dated: June 26, 2009. 

Diane Howard, 

Chief, Policy Division, Office of Acquisition 

and Assistance, U.S. Agency for International 

Development. 

[FR Doc. E9–16227 Filed 7–8–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

50 CFR Part 17 

[FWS-R8-ES-2009-0019; MO9221050083] 

RIN 1018-AV91 

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 

and Plants; Listing Casey’s June 

Beetle (Dinacoma caseyi) as 

Endangered and Designation of 

Critical Habitat 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service (Service), propose to 

list Casey’s June beetle (Dinacoma 

caseyi) as endangered under the 

Endangered Species Act and propose to 

designate approximately 777 acres (ac) 

(314 hectares (ha)) of land as critical 

habitat for Casey’s June beetle in south 

Palm Springs, Riverside County, 

California. This species inhabits desert 

chaparral plant communities associated 

with gently sloping, depositional 

surfaces formed at the base of the Santa 

Rosa Mountains in the Coachella Valley 

region. This proposed rule, if made 

final, would implement Federal 

protection provided by the Act. 

DATES: We will accept comments 

received or postmarked on or before 

September 8, 2009. We must receive 

requests for public hearings, in writing 

at the address shown in FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT August 24, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by one of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public 

Comments Processing, Attn: [FWS- R8- 

ES-2009-0019]; Division of Policy and 

Directives Management; U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, 

Suite 222; Arlington, VA 22203. 

We will not accept e-mail or faxes. We 

will post all comments on http:// 

www.regulations.gov. This generally 

means that we will post any personal 

information you provide us (see the 

Public Comments section below for 

more information). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim 

Bartel, Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service, Carlsbad Field Office, 

6010 Hidden Valley Road, Suite 101, 

Carlsbad, CA 92011; telephone: 760– 

431–9440; facsimile: 760–431–5901. If 

you use a telecommunications device 

for the deaf (TDD), call the Federal 

Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 

800–877–8339. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Comments 

We intend that any final action 

resulting from this proposal will be 

based on the best scientific and 

commercial data available and be as 

accurate and as effective as possible. 

Therefore, we request comments or 

suggestions on this proposed rule from 

the public, tribes, other concerned 

governmental agencies, the scientific 

community, industry, or any other 

interested parties. We particularly seek 

comments concerning: 

(1) Any available information on 

known or suspected threats and 

proposed or ongoing projects with the 

potential to threaten Casey’s June beetle, 

specifically: (a) The present or 

threatened destruction, modification or 

curtailment of its habitat or range; (b) 

overutilization for commercial, 

recreational, scientific, or educational 

purposes; (c) disease or predation; (d) 

the inadequacy of existing regulatory 

mechanisms; and (e) other natural or 

manmade factors affecting its continued 

existence; 

(2) The reasons why we should or 

should not designate habitat as ‘‘critical 

habitat’’ under section 4 of the 

Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 

amended (Act; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), 

including whether there are threats to 

the species from human activity, the 

degree of which can be expected to 

increase due to the designation, and 


rmajette on DSK29S0YB1 with PROPOSALS