alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of California Gold Corp. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2009,as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, James D. Davidson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of December
14, 2009.





/s/
      James D. DavidsonJames
      D. DavidsonChief
      Executive Officer andChief
      Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to
California Gold Corp., and will be retained by California Gold Corp., and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ruben Ortiz, Appellant.

[854 NYS2d 2]

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment, which originally charged second-degree murder, made on the ground of preindictment delay. Defendant has not established any prejudice from the 11-year delay, which was caused by the fact that the police had no witnesses or suspects, and, despite good faith efforts, did not ascertain the identity of the perpetrator until after the advent of new fingerprint comparison technology *(see United States v Lovasco,*431 US 783 [1977]; *People v Singer,*44 NY2d 241, 252-255 [1978]; *People v Taranovich,*37 NY2d 442 [1975]). Defendant’s arguments to the contrary, including those that improperly cite documents that are not part of the record, are without merit.

Defendant’s written and oral waivers, taken together, establish a valid and enforceable waiver of the right to appeal *(see People v Ramos,*7 NY3d 737 [2006]; *People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248 [2006]). The court expressly informed defendant that as a condition of the plea he was agreeing to waive his right to appeal, *280and the court separated that right from the rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea. This waiver forecloses review of defendant’s procedural and substantive claims relating to his suppression motion, and his excessive sentence claim. In any event, we find all of these claims without merit. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
F OR P UB L I CAT I ON U N I TED STA TES C O U R T O F A PPEA LS FO RTH E N I N TH C I R C U I T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME RI CA , P la intif

f - A p p e llant, v. COM P RE HE NS I V E DRUG T E S T I NG, I N C ., D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 05- 10067 D . C. N o . M I SC- 0 4 - 2 3 4 - SI O R D ER

M A J O RLEA G U E BA SEBA LL P L AY E RS AS S OC I AT I ON , P eti ti on er- A pp el l ee , v. UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME RI CA , R e s p o n d e nt - A p p e llant. N o. 05- 15006 D . C. N o . CV - 0 4 - 0 0 7 0 7 - J CM



# FI LED SEP 30 2008 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2 05- 10067

I n r e : SEA R C H W A R R A N TS E X E CU T E D O N A P RI L 8 , 2 0 0 4 AT C D T , I N C ., S E A L 1, P la intif

f - A p p e llant, v. S E A L 2, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 05- 55354 D . C . N o . C V - 0 4 - 0 2 8 8 7 - F MC

KOZ I NS KI , C hi ef

Judg e: U po n the vo t e of am aj ori ty of non re cuse d active j ud ges, i ti s order ed that thi s c as e be r eheard en banc purs uantt o C irc ui tRul e 35-3. T he three -j ud ge panel o p in io ns h a ll n o t b e c ite da s p r e c e d e nt b yo rto anyc o urt o f th e N inthC ir c u it.
#### Christopher Ricciardi et al., Appellants, v Bernard Janowitz Construction Corp. et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. JME Fire Sprinkler Corp. et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

[853 NYS2d 373]

*625The plaintiff Christopher Ricciardi (hereinafter the plaintiff) was injured when he fell from the seventh rung of an unsecured A-frame ladder while installing a sprinkler system at a construction site. As he tightened an overhead pipe with a wrench, the unsecured ladder began to slide and the front legs lifted off the ground, causing the plaintiff to fall backwards to the ground. Under these circumstances, the plaintiff established his prima facie entitlement to summary judgment on the issue of liability pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1) *(see Argueta v Pomona Panorama Estates, Ltd.,*39 AD3d 785, 786 [2007]; *Rivera v Dafna Constr. Co., Ltd.,*27 AD3d 545 [2006]; *Chlap v 43rd St.-Second Ave. Corp.,*18 AD3d 598 [2005]; *Granillo v Donna Karen Co.,*17 AD3d 531 [2005]; *Loreto v 376 St. Johns Condominium, Inc.,*15 AD3d 454, 455 [2005]; *Scotti v Federation Dev. Corp.,*289 AD2d 322, 323 [2001]; *Guzman v Gumley-Haft, Inc.,*274 AD2d 555, 556 [2000]; *cf. Bland v Manocherian,*66 NY2d 452, 460 [1985]).

In opposition, the respondents failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiffs conduct was the sole proximate cause of the accident *(see Argueta v Pomona Panorama Estates, Ltd.,*39 AD3d at 786; *Chlap v 43rd St.-Second Ave. Corp.,*18 AD3d 598 [2005]; *Wallace v Stonehenge Group,*1 AD3d 589, 590 [2003]; *compare Blake v Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of N.Y. City,*1 NY3d 280, 291 [2003]) or as to whether the failure to properly secure the ladder was not a substantial factor leading to the plaintiffs injuries *(see Guzman v Gumley-Haft, Inc.,*274 AD2d at 556). Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in denying the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1). Skelos, J.P., Fisher, Covello and Eng, JJ., concur.
# covid_table57_c63_size_class
#### Atalaya Special Opportunities Fund IV LP et al., Respondents, v James Crystal, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[976 NYS2d 383]

*491Order, Supreme Court, New York County (O. Peter Sherwood, J.), entered July 30, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the first and third causes of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In opposition to plaintiffs’ prima facie showing of their entitlement to enforce the loan, defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to the existence of a binding proposal that compromised the debt. Following the expiration of the terms of a 2011 letter agreement between defendants and Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., plaintiffs’ predecessor in interest, Wells Fargo issued defendants a proposal for further compromising the balance owed under the loan. The proposal letter specifically identified itself as a “proposal, to be used as a basis for continued discussions,” and stated that, upon acceptance, a letter agreement would be prepared. The anticipation of a written agreement was consistent with the terms of the loan, which required that modifications be in writing and signed by the parties. No such formal writing was entered into *(see*General Obligations Law § 15-301 [1]; *Kowalchuk v Stroup,*61 AD3d 118, 121 [1st Dept 2009]).

The parties’ subsequent communications also reflect the absence of an intent to be bound by the proposal. Defendants’ conduct in proceeding with the sale of a radio station and plaintiffs’ conduct in directing defendants to proceed with the sale and accepting a portion of the proceeds thereof are equally consistent with the parties’ respective rights and obligations under the loan documents *(see Richardson & Lucas, Inc. v New York Athletic Club of City of N.Y.,*304 AD2d 462 [1st Dept 2003]; *Tierney v Capricorn Invs.,*189 AD2d 629, 631 [1st Dept 1993], *lv denied*81 NY2d 710 [1993]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6


       Amendment to Jason Incorporated 1987 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan

                        Adopted by the Board of Directors
                           Effective January 30, 2000

         RESOLVED, that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in
the Option Plan or in any agreement, document or instrument executed pursuant to
the Option Plan, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control (as defined in this
resolution), all outstanding options granted pursuant to the Option Plan which
have not already become fully vested at the time of the Change in Control shall
immediately become fully vested and available for purchase. The term "Change in
Control," as used in this resolution, means either of the following:

                  (a)    the Merger; or

                  (b)    any other merger, recapitalization or other business
combination of the Corporation, with or into another corporation, or an
acquisition of securities or assets by the Corporation, pursuant to which the
Corporation is not the continuing or surviving corporation or pursuant to which
any shares of the Corporation's common stock would be converted into cash,
securities or other property, other than a transaction in which the holders of
at least 50% of the Corporation's common stock immediately prior to such
transaction will own at least 50% of the total voting power of the then
outstanding securities of the surviving corporation immediately after such
transaction; and

         FURTHER RESOLVED, that effective as of December 31, 1999, in the case
of the retirement of the holder of any option granted pursuant to the Option
Plan, the exercise period for such option shall be one year from the date of
such holder's retirement from employment with the Company, unless the exercise
period would expire for reasons other than the expiration of such one-year
period.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 4, 2009 

s0128 

Order 

 

February 4, 2009 

136675 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136675 

 COA: 280015 

Wayne CC: 00-002995-01 

LAMONT SHREVE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2008 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, C.J., and CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the report of Ridgewood Energy T Fund, LLC (the Fund) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2008 as furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.

|       |                 |  |     |        |                                                       
|------ | --------------- |  | --- | ------ | ------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: | July 25,
  2008 |  |     |        | RIDGEWOOD
  ENERGY T FUND, LLC                        
|       |                 |  |     |        |                                                       
|       |                 |  | By: | /s/    | ROBERT E.
  SWANSON                                   
|       |                 |  |     |        |                                                       
|       |                 |  |     | Name:  | Robert E.
  Swanson                                   
|       |                 |  |     | Title: | President
  and Chief Executive Officer               
|       |                 |  |     |        | (Principal
  Executive Officer)                       
|       |                 |  |     |        |                                                       
|Dated: | July 25,
  2008 |  |     |        |                                                       
|       |                 |  | By: | /s/    | KATHLEEN P.
  MCSHERRY                                
|       |                 |  |     |        |                                                       
|       |                 |  |     | Name:  | Kathleen P.
  McSherry                                
|       |                 |  |     | Title: | Executive
  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|       |                 |  |     |        | (Principal
  Financial and Accounting Officer)        

A signed original of this
written statement or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement has been provided to Ridgewood Energy T Fund, LLC and
will be retained by Ridgewood Energy T Fund, LLC and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1321 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1321

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit interference with 
         voting systems under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 6, 2019

Mr. Blumenthal (for himself, Mr. Graham, and Mr. Whitehouse) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit interference with 
         voting systems under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defending the Integrity of Voting 
Systems Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON INTERFERENCE WITH VOTING SYSTEMS.

    Section 1030(e) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``or'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by adding ``or'' at the 
                end; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) that--
                            ``(i) is part of a voting system; and
                            ``(ii)(I) is used for the management, 
                        support, or administration of a Federal 
                        election; or
                            ``(II) has moved in or otherwise affects 
                        interstate or foreign commerce;'';
            (2) in paragraph (11), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (3) in paragraph (12), by striking the period and inserting 
        a semicolon; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(13) the term `Federal election' means any election (as 
        defined in section 301(1) of the Federal Election Campaign Act 
        of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30101(1))) for Federal office (as defined in 
        section 301(3) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (52 
        U.S.C. 30101(3))); and
            ``(14) the term `voting system' has the meaning given the 
        term in section 301(b) of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (52 
        U.S.C. 21081(b)).''.
                                 <all>
```
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Striker
Energy Corp. for the interim period ended August 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, Joseph
Carusone, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended; and                           
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                            
| | 2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Striker Energy Corp.

October 15, 2009

| | /s/
      Joseph Carusone                               
| | --------------------------------------------------------
| | Joseph Carusone                                         
| | President, Chief Executive Officer Chief
      Financial
| | Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director              
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial 
| | Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)               

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Striker Energy
Corp. and will be retained by Striker Energy Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of

INDEPENDENT BANCSHARES, INC.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Independent BancShares, Inc., hereby certifies that:

1. Independent BancShares, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Independent BancShares, Inc.

/S/ Mark A. ImesMark A. Imes
President and Chief Executive Officer

August 11, 2005
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JAMES EDWARD MATHIS, ) DOC #474031, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2230 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed March 20, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Kimberly K. Fernandez, Judge. James Edward Mathis, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and SMITH, Concur.
Exhibit 99.1
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of PLM Equipment Growth Fund II Liquidating Trust (the "Trust"), on Form 10-KSB for the period from September 30, 2003 (inception) through December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the President of the Trustee and of the Trust, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the Report of the Trust filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the net assets in liquidation and changes in net assets in liquidation of the Trust.
 
 
 
 
 
 /s/ James A. Coyne
 James A. Coyne
 President of PLM Financial Services, Inc.
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 March 25, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Stephen G. Hoffmann and Jonathan J. Wick certify as
follows:

1. They are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Canyon Bancorp.

2. The Form 10-Q of Canyon Bancorp, for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2008, complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Canyon Bancorp.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen G. Hoffmann
|                        |  |  |  | Stephen G. Hoffmann    
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Jonathan J. Wick   
|                        |  |  |  | Jonathan J. Wick       
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

      ( print page 32648)    

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure will hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation.

# DATES:

April 29-30, 2010.

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

# ADDRESSES:

The Windsor Court Hotel, 300 Gravier Street, New Orleans, LA 70130.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

Dated: July 1, 2009.

John K. Rabiej,

Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.

[FR Doc. E9-16016 Filed 7-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-M