alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 125 (Wednesday, July 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15579]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel, Mental Health Services In Non-Specialty Settings.
    Date: July 6, 2009.
    Time: 5 p.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Aileen Schulte, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental 
Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd, Room 6140, 
MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, 301-443-1225, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f79684949f829b8392b79a969e9bd9999e9fd9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c5a4b6a6adb0a9b1a085a8a4aca9ebabacadeba2aab3">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 23, 2009.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-15579 Filed 6-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 15-303V

Filed: June 22, 2015

Unpublished

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ROBERT VANOSDOL, *

*

Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

* Tetanus diphtheria acellular pertussis 

* (“Tdap”); Brachial Neuritis; Table Injury;

* Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

John Robert Howie, Jr., Howie Law, P.C., Dallas, TX, for petitioner.

Lara Ann Englund, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Vowell, Chief Special Master:

On March 25, 2015, Robert VanOsdol filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 [the 

“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that he suffered brachial neuritis after 

receiving a Tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine on April 13, 

2012. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office 

of Special Masters.

On June 22, 2015, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she concedes 

that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, respondent states that “Medical personnel at the Division of Injury 

Compensation Programs, Department of Health and Human Services (“DICP”), have 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to 

post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 

note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2006).

 
reviewed the petition and supporting documentation filed in this case. Based on this 

review, DICP concludes that petitioner suffered a Table brachial neuritis, and that there 

is not a preponderance of evidence that the brachial neuritis was due to factors 

unrelated to the vaccination. Therefore, compensation is appropriate.” Id. at 4. 

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation.

s/Denise K. Vowell

Denise K. Vowell

Chief Special Master
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE**

**OFFICEROF GENERAL PARTNER OF HILAND HOLDINGS GP, LP**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theaccompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three and six monthsended June 30, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph L. Griffin, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President of Hiland Partners GP Holdings, LLC, the general partnerof Hiland Holdings GP, LP (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 11, 2008 | /s/ Joseph L. Griffin                  |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                       | Joseph L. Griffin                      |
|                       | Chief Executive Officer and  President |

 

----
ACCEPTED

12-14-00045-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

7/27/2015 10:11:46 AM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 7/27/2015 10:11:46 AM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6688]

Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 2003, and Executive Order 13372 of February 16, 2005, I hereby determine that the organization known as Kata'ib Hizballah (and other aliases) has committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.

Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 13224 that “for those persons * * * determined to be subject to the order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States * * * prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render these measures ineffectual,” I determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

      ( print page 31789)    
Dated: June 24, 2009.

James Steinberg,

Deputy Secretary of State, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-15666 Filed 7-1-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 1087

In re: JONATHAN EUGENE BRUNSON

,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 5:14

- hc

- 02009

- FL )

Submitted : April 14, 2020 Decided: April 17, 2020

Before WILKINSON

, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Jonathan Eugene Brunson , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Eugene Brunson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district

court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion to reconsider

. He seeks an order from

this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue de lay

in the district court

. A ccordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

P ETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 3.2

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

OF

FARO MINING AND MILLING CORPORATION

ARTICLE I



The Articles of Amendment to the original Articles of Incorporation of Faro
Mining and Milling Corporation, a Utah corporation are set forth as follows:

A.	The name of the corporation:

The name of the corporation whose articles are being amended herewith is Faro
Mining and Milling Corporation.

B.	Amendments Adopted:

Article I of the Articles of Incorporation relating to the name of the
corporation is hereby amended to read as follows:

"The name of the corporation is T.W.A.R., Inc.".

Article IV of the articles of incorporation relating to the stock of the
corporation is hereby amended to read as follows:

The aggregate number of shares which This Corporation shall have authority
to issue is twenty million (20,000,000) shares of stock with no par value,
all stock of the corporation shall be of the same class, common, and shall
have the same rights and preferences. Fully paid stock of this corporation
shall not be liable to any further call or assessment.

Presently issued shares of the $0.001 par value stock- of the corporation
shall be exchanged for new shares of no par value stock of the corporation
on the basis of a one for fifty reverse and one share of the new no par
Value Stock shall be issued for each 50 shares of $0.001 stock with fractional
shares being rounded to the nearest whole. No script will be issued.

	C.	Date of adoption.

The aforesaid amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Faro Mining
Milling Corporation was adopted at a special shareholders meeting held
November 17, l986.

As of the date of the special shareholders meeting the corporation had issued
and outstanding fifty million (50,000,000) shares of stock, all of which were
entitled to vote on the proposed amendment. None of the shares of the
corporation were entitled to vote as a class.

At the special stockholders meeting held November 17, 1936, 45,923,200 shares
voted in favor of the amendments.

No shares voted against the amendments. None of the shares were entitled to
vote as a class.

DATED this 17th day of November, 1986


/s/ Edward T. Wells
President, Director

/s/ Keith J Shuler
Vice President, Director

/s/ Sharlene C. Wells
Secretary, Director

Sate of Utah)
County of Salt Lake)

On the 17th day of November, 1986 personally appeared before me,
Edward T. Wells, Sharlene C. Wells and Keith Schuler, signors of the
the foregoing Articles of Amendment, who being first duly sworn, acknowledged
to me that they executed said Articles of Amendment for the reasons stated
therein.


	DATED this 24th day of January 1979.

/s/ Delila Moon
Notary Public residing at Salt Lake County.


My commission expires 12/23/89




<PAGE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-4899

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TERRELL QUANTE LEDBETTER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,

District Judge. (1:05-cr-00246)

Submitted: August 31, 2007 Decided: October 3, 2007

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sandra J. Barrett, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant.

Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North

Carolina, Amy E. Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville,

North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Terrell Quante Ledbetter pled guilty to conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute cocaine base and was sentenced to

210 months of imprisonment. On appeal, Ledbettter alleges that his

trial counsel provided ineffective assistance for failing to argue

at sentencing previously filed objections to his presentence

report. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are not

cognizable on direct appeal, unless the record conclusively

establishes ineffective assistance. United States v. James, 337

F.3d 387, 391 (4th Cir. 2003); United States v. Richardson, 195

F.3d 192, 198 (4th Cir. 1999). Rather, to allow for adequate

development of the record, claims of ineffective assistance

generally should be brought in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion.

United States v. Hoyle, 33 F.3d 415, 418 (4th Cir. 1994). We find

that ineffective assistance of counsel is not conclusively

established on the record before us.

Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

 AFFIRMED
@misc{104341,
  author = {Samuel Low},
  title = {NIST Recommended Practice Guide: Rockwell Hardness Measurement of Metallic Materials},
  year = {2001},
  month = {2001-01-01},
  publisher = {Special Publication (NIST SP), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=853006},
  language = {en},
}
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-20144

Summary Calendar

ROBERT JAMES FOX,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CV-1880

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and ELROD and HIGGINSON, Circuit 

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert James Fox appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 civil rights complaint, liberally construed, as barred by the “three 

strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). He asserts that he has no knowledge 

of any strikes.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 24, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
No. 14-20144

2

In 2001, the Northern District of Texas concluded that Fox had a pattern 

of filing frivolous lawsuits and sanctioned Fox by prohibiting him from filing 

any future litigation in the Northern District of Texas without first obtaining 

permission. In dismissing the instant case, the district court relied on that

earlier district court’s order to determine that the instant complaint was 

barred under § 1915(g). However, this 2001 order is not a strike under § 

1915(g), and there is no record of any other cases where Fox, “while 

incarcerated or detained in any facility,” brought “an action or appeal in a court 

of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it [was] frivolous, 

malicious, or fail[ed] to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” § 

1915(g).

Therefore, the district court erred in determining that Fox had three 

strikes at the time he filed the instant lawsuit and in concluding that Fox was 

barred under § 1915(g) from proceeding IFP. Accordingly, the district court’s 

judgment is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings 

consistent with this opinion.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of TIANYIN PHARMACEUTICAL CO, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dr. Guoqing Jiang, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.   Date:  May 12, 2008  /s/  Dr. Guoqing Jiang Dr. Guoqing Jiang, Chief Executive Officer/Acting Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 32105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15970]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food and Nutrition Service


National Advisory Council on Maternal, Infant and Fetal 
Nutrition; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, this notice 
announces a meeting of the National Advisory Council on Maternal, 
Infant and Fetal Nutrition.

DATES: July 21-23, 2009, 9 a.m.-5:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Food and Nutrition Service, 
3101 Park Center Drive, Room 830 (July 21), Room 204 A & B (July 22-
23), Alexandria, VA 22302.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla McTigue, Supplemental Food 
Programs Division, Food and Nutrition Service, Department of 
Agriculture, (703) 305-2086.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Council will continue its study of the 
Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children 
(WIC), and the Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSFP). The agenda 
will include updates and discussion of implementation of the WIC food 
package, WIC cost containment, CSFP Farm Bill provisions, participation 
trends, and current research studies. Meetings of the Council are open 
to the public. Members of the public may participate, as time permits. 
Members of the public may file written statements before or after the 
meeting with Carla McTigue, Supplemental Food Programs Division, 3101 
Park Center Drive, Room 522, Alexandria, Virginia 22302. If members of 
the public need special accommodations, please notify Mr. Dennis Murray 
by July 7, 2009, at (703) 305-2704, or e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4521202b2b2c366b28303737243c05232b366b303621246b222a33"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="294d4c4747405a07445c5b5b4850694f475a075c5a4d48074e465f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: July 1, 2009.
Julia Paradis,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-15970 Filed 7-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen R. Brunner, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and President of Constellation Energy Partners LLC, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:

(i) The
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Constellation Energy Partners LLC.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Stephen R. Brunner                                        
|Stephen R. Brunner                                            
|Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer
and President

Date:
May 7, 2010