alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1306

BENNIE JAY EATMON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus B.D. MORGAN, INCORPORATED; BILLY D. MORGAN, individually; E.L. ROSS, INCORPORATED; MACKIE ROGERS, individually; BILLY ELLINGTON, individually; PHIL HICKS, individually; FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION; JOHN DOE; JANE JANNELL DOE, RN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-02-745-5-BO; CA-02-746-5-BO) Submitted: October 3, 2005 Decided: October 20, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bennie Jay Eatmon, Appellant Pro Se. Franklin LeVerne Adams, Jr., VALENTINE, ADAMS & LAMAR, L.L.P., Nashville, North Carolina; Derek Morgan Crump, BROWN, CRUMP, VANORE & TIERNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina; Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.- 2 - Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Bennie Jay Eatmon appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions for judgment on the pleadings and for summary judgment and dismissing his civil action. He also appeals the district court’s denial of his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. SeeEatmon v. B.D. Morgan, Inc. , No. 5:02-CV-745-BO(3) (E.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 2004); Eatmon v. B.D. Morgan, Inc. , No. 5:02-CV-745-BO(3) (E.D.N.C. Jan. 12, 2005). We deny Eatmon’s motion to stay. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# table44_q5.4_state
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         425,211
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               425,211
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 443,935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,393
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,313
<OTHER-SE>                                     364,229
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   443,935
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,132
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  163,884
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,014
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (150,752)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (150,752)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 673,189
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   522,437
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .81


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Michael E. Mercer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EV Energy Partners, L.P.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) [Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 34-47986];  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date:November 14, 2006 /s/ MICHAEL E. MERCER         Michael E. Mercer    Chief Financial Officer of EV Management LLC,    general partner of EV Energy GP, L.P.,    general partner of EV Energy Partners, L.P.
##### 



Exhibit 10.1
  Omaha, Nebraska 
Note Date: July 18, 2007
    
    $3,500,000.00
Maturity Date: July 17, 2008
 Red Trail Energy, LLC First National Bank of Omaha
    Red Trail Energy, LLC,
 By:
    
    /s/ Mike Appert
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Roger BerglundName:
    
    Mike Appert
    
    Name:
    
    Roger BerglundTitle:
    
    Chairman
    
    Title:
    
    Treas.




---



##### 



STATE OF
    
    North Dakota
    
    
    ))
    
    
    ss.COUNTY OF
    
    Stark
    
    
    )
  /s/ De Ell HoffNotary PublicDEELL HOFFNotary PublicState of North DakotaMy Commission Expires Oct. 21, 2011
 STATE OF
    
    North Dakota
    
    
    ))
    
    
    ss.COUNTY OF
    
    Stark
    
    
    )
  /s/ De Ell HoffNotary PublicDEELL HOFFNotary PublicState of North DakotaMy Commission Expires Oct. 21, 2011
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 163 Filed 04/01/14 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 3218
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 163 Filed 04/01/14 Page 2 of 16 PageID: 3219
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 163 Filed 04/01/14 Page 3 of 16 PageID: 3220
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 163 Filed 04/01/14 Page 4 of 16 PageID: 3221
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 163 Filed 04/01/14 Page 5 of 16 PageID: 3222
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 163 Filed 04/01/14 Page 6 of 16 PageID: 3223
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 163 Filed 04/01/14 Page 7 of 16 PageID: 3224
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 163 Filed 04/01/14 Page 8 of 16 PageID: 3225
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 163 Filed 04/01/14 Page 9 of 16 PageID: 3226
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 163 Filed 04/01/14 Page 10 of 16 PageID: 3227
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 163 Filed 04/01/14 Page 11 of 16 PageID: 3228
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 163 Filed 04/01/14 Page 12 of 16 PageID: 3229
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 163 Filed 04/01/14 Page 13 of 16 PageID: 3230
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 163 Filed 04/01/14 Page 14 of 16 PageID: 3231
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 163 Filed 04/01/14 Page 15 of 16 PageID: 3232
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 163 Filed 04/01/14 Page 16 of 16 PageID: 3233
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 130 (Thursday, July 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 32961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16215]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (09-063)]


NASA Advisory Council; Science Committee; Heliophysics 
Subcommittee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 
announces a meeting of the Heliophysics Subcommittee of the NASA 
Advisory Council (NAC). This Subcommittee reports to the Science 
Committee of the NAC. The Meeting will be held for the purpose of 
soliciting from the scientific community and other persons scientific 
and technical information relevant to program planning.

DATES: Monday, July 13, 2009, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Tuesday, July 
14, 2009, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.

ADDRESSES: L'Enfant Plaza Hotel, Renoir Room, 480 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., 
Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Marian Norris, Science Mission 
Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-4452, 
fax (202) 358-4118, or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e78a898895958e94a789869486c9808891"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="503d3e3f22223923103e3123317e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting includes the 
following topics:

--Heliophysics Division Overview and Program Status;
--Annual Review of Heliophysics Science Performance for Fiscal Year 
2009;
--Status of Proposed Revision to Heliophysics Data Policy;
--Discussion of Decadal Survey Assessment and NASA Response;
--Update on Interagency Planning for Space Weather Monitor at the L1 
Libration Point.

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. 
Attendees will be requested to sign a register. For future information, 
you may contact Marian Norris via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d2023223f3f243e0d232c3e2c632a223b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e68b888994948f95a688879587c8818990">[email protected]</span></a> or by 
telephone at (202) 358-4452.

P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-16215 Filed 7-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 86 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Select Committee on the Climate 

Crisis and the Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2019 

Ms. LOFGREN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Select Committee 

on the Climate Crisis and the Select Committee on the 

Modernization of Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR EXPENSES OF SELECT COMMIT3 TEES. 

4 (a) SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE CLIMATE CRISIS.— 

5 (1) PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.—There shall be 

6 paid out of the applicable accounts of the House of 

7 Representatives not more than $70,000 for the ex8 penses of the Select Committee on the Climate Cri9 sis established under section 104(f) of House Reso10 lution 6, as agreed to January 9, 2019, to be availVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:00 Jan 29, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR86.IH HR86

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 86 IH 

1 able during the period beginning at noon on January 

2 1, 2019, and ending on March 31, 2019. 

3 (2) VOUCHERS.—Payments under this sub4 section shall be made on vouchers authorized by the 

5 Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, signed by 

6 the chair of the Select Committee, and approved in 

7 the manner directed by the Committee on House 

8 Administration. 

9 (b) SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE MODERNIZATION

10 OF CONGRESS.— 

11 (1) PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.—There shall be 

12 paid out of the applicable accounts of the House of 

13 Representatives not more than $50,000 for the ex14 penses of the Select Committee on the Moderniza15 tion of Congress established under title II of House 

16 Resolution 6, as agreed to January 9, 2019, to be 

17 available during the period beginning at noon on 

18 January 1, 2019, and ending on March 31, 2019. 

19 (2) VOUCHERS.—Payments under this sub20 section shall be made on vouchers authorized by the 

21 Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress, 

22 signed by the chair of the Select Committee, and ap23 proved in the manner directed by the Committee on 

24 House Administration. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 86 IH 

1 (c) REGULATIONS.—Amounts made available under 

2 this resolution shall be expended in accordance with regu3 lations prescribed by the Committee on House Administra4 tion. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT A 

to 

Application of MCRGO and NJCSD 

For Leave to File an Amicus Brief 

Case 2:10-cv-06110-WHW-MCA Document 30-1 Filed 02/18/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 317
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lewis George, Appellant.

[855 NYS2d 551]

As correctly conceded by the People, the two counts of robbery in the third degree were inclusory concurrent counts of the robbery in the first degree count and one count of robbery in the second degree *(see*CPL 300.30 [4]; *People v Hutson,*43 AD3d 959 [2007], *lv denied*9 NY3d 1006 [2007]; *People v Curry,*302 AD2d 538 [2003]; *People v Boyer,*295 AD2d 529 [2002]). A verdict of guilt upon the greater count is deemed a dismissal of every lesser count *(see*CPL 300.40 [3]). Therefore, the convictions of robbery in the third degree must be vacated and those counts of the indictment dismissed *(see People v Lee,*39 NY2d 388 [1976]; *People v Hutson,*43 AD3d 959 [2007], *lv denied*9 NY3d 1006 [2007]).

The defendant’s failure to raise an objection to the remarks *555made by the prosecutor on summation renders his claim that he was denied his right to a fair trial unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Garner,*27 AD3d 764 [2006]).

However, the defendant is correct that the court erred in striking his testimony that the car which was implicated in three of the robberies did not belong to him and had been borrowed from the owner, who also used to lend it to four or five other people. Furthermore, contrary to the People’s contention, this issue was preserved for appellate review. Nevertheless, the error was harmless as there was overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt, and no significant probability that the error contributed to his convictions *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 237 [1975]; *People v Rush*44 AD3d 799 [2007], *lv denied*9 NY3d 1009 [2007]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Balkin, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2





Certification of Principal Financial Officer





Certification Pursuant to Section 302


of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, David C. Dreyer, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and





Date: April 30, 2013





/s/ DAVID C. DREYERDavid C. DreyerChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
uimT Mo:wK-ll-NQQie>fc-C/ft\ 5 TriaLCaUSE rio\l2jMSSl

TOMMIE W/LL/AM5 5 IN THE DISTRICT Wi/^T

APPtL-UWT 5 2 8Z^cD^TR|GT CDMAT

V5, \ DHl«^CO0/^y,TEv(AS lifecSTflffe OF T£XA£ 3

DBF^nIQAnJT fliefc T#|^ KlDTiQ^ TO JWPfrMD ftSgoFIwurata

1.3(B) TR.A.R JUL 27 2015

TO MbMb\JC $\AOQ\Z Of <IAID COURTS Abel Acosto, Clerk

K/OW COM&. TbMMIg WIWAM£ O^T^MOAnJT/M *TtfE Mt>& SH\X ^uH&eft A^D GAM^T. fiUtf -TWvS MOToM To ^P^ «^D IN

fl.3 (6) TR.A.ft ^o MU, JaowTHIvf COM.T T^ fOTJfifOT^1^^8

JUL 27 2015

^n^DA/s/T is ccufwtr \hi rwE m^m mm*** twirsta'Cierk

1TD.6.J, PMSol A/OO IvT UfJAGL^Tt? OftTftlH Gd/>ISS<>£ AC65XS

it) A CoP^ MO-HH6 TO P/MfOT T* Tfr4 toflttf TffAT TH^

COUKX PsSOoiR^ (paThCfttQ KPPehUhlb M<7Tlc*4) 3 CoPiBS

zr.

SeFHMOAN/T P&SPZtfpvuM R£G>U&ST 1WTTHW CWAT 6&arfT

THIS MtfTtohl TO <MP£MO RUU? 13 (6) of 1^ "TftAP

60 PKiWED.

6ummeo

ToMMI^ k)llUhtAS*tf31%i

FtehlCU Ro&5f<T<SOi4 UMIT

iZOTI FM3522.

oClcoH NlU/IAMi?, MDTI6N1 TO £kWM0 R0l£ ^3 fft oF TfcftP Pa&£ I of= |
<Page>

                         [FORM OF FACE OF CERTIFICATE]



              Organized Under the Laws of the State of South Dakota


                                                           CLASS A CAPITAL UNITS

A-

                            SOYBEAN PROCESSORS, LLC

   THIS CERTIFIES THAT______________________________________ IS THE OWNER AND
  REGISTERED HOLDER OF___________________________________ CLASS A CAPITAL UNITS

                           in Soybean Processors, LLC

TRANSFERABLE ONLY ON THE BOOKS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BY THE HOLDER
HEREOF IN PERSON OR BY DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY UPON SURRENDER OF THIS
CERTIFICATE PROPERLY ENDORSED.

              IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE SAID LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY HAS CAUSED
              THIS CERTIFICATE TO BE SIGNED BY ITS DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS THIS
              DAY OF , 200__.


   ___________________________                   ___________________________
           SECRETARY                                      PRESIDENT


<Page>

                        [FORM OF REVERSE OF CERTIFICATE]

           The sale and transfer of the Capital Units represented
           by this Certificate are restricted by, and subject to,
           the provisions of the Operating Agreement of Soybean
           Processors, LLC. The Operating Agreement provides, among
           other things, that no sale, assignment, transfer, gift,
           exchange or other disposition of these Capital Units is
           valid except as specifically provided for in the
           Operating Agreement. Copies of the Operating Agreement
           and instructions for transfer, sale or other disposition
           of these Capital Units are available for inspection at
           the Company's principal office.

FOR VALUE RECEIVED __________ HEREBY SELL, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER UNTO ___________
_______________________________________________________________________________
_____________ CAPITAL UNITS REPRESENTED BY THE WITHIN CERTIFICATE, AND DO HEREBY
IRREVOCABLY CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT ________________________________ ATTORNEY TO
TRANSFER THE SAID CAPITAL UNITS ON THE BOOKS OF THE WITHIN NAMED LIMITED
LIABILITY COMPANY WITH FULL POWER OF SUBSTITUTION IN THE PREMISES.

DATED         ____________________, 20_____

IN PRESENCE OF ___________________________________________________

NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS
WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT
ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1313** 

SISAY AWRARIS BELETE , Petitioner ,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petitio n for R eview of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appe als

.

Submitted : October 18, 2011 Decided: November 7, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Alan M. Parra, LAW OFFICE OF ALAN M. PARRA, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner

. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Shelley R. Goad, Assistant Director, Russell J.E. Verby, Senior Litigation Counsel, U NITED S TATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , Office of Immigration Litigation , Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions ar e not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Sisay Awraris Belete, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applicati ons for relief from removal. Belete first challenges the determination that he failed to establish eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was s o compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias

- Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483

- 84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and Belete’s
claims and conclude that Belete fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Belete cannot meet the more stringent standard for withholding
of removal. Chen v. INS , 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999);

INS v. Cardoza

- Fonseca , 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Fin ally, we uphold the finding below that Belete failed to qualify for protection under the Convention Against Torture. 8 C.F.R.

§ 1208.16(c) (2011). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts a nd legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED