alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 125 (Wednesday, July 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31425]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15456]



[[Page 31425]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER96-1085-013]


South Carolina Electric & Gas Company; Notice of Filing

June 24, 2009.
    Take notice that on January 13, 2009, South Carolina Electric & Gas 
Company (SCE&G) filed a response to the Commission's December 23, 2008 
Letter Order requesting SCE&G to submit additional information 
regarding its updated market power analysis filed with the Commission 
on September 2, 2008.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a5e3e0f7e6eacbc9cccbc0f6d0d5d5cad7d1e5c3c0d7c68bc2cad3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="83c5c6d1c0ccedefeaede6d0f6f3f3ecf1f7c3e5e6f1e0ade4ecf5">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on July 6, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-15456 Filed 6-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
|                                         | 31.1                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|---------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
|                                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|I, Lisa Norman, certify that:           
|1.                                       | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Home Alliance Corporation.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|2.                                       | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.
|3.                                       | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results from operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.                





|By:  /s/Lisa NormanLisa Norman
Chief Executive Officer & Chairman | Date:  October 11, 2011
|----------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-13319

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00463-CEH-TBM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

JOHNATHAN BERGREN, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(July 20, 2015)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 14-13319 Date Filed: 07/20/2015 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Ron Smith, appointed counsel for Johnathan Bergren in this direct criminal 

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and 

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 

L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that 

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because 

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bergren’s conviction and 

sentence are AFFIRMED. However, the judgment of conviction contains a 

clerical error, identifying Bergren’s conviction as a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1349, 

instead of 18 U.S.C. § 1349, as charged in Count One of the superseding 

indictment. Accordingly, the judgment is VACATED and REMANDED to the 

district court for the limited purpose of correcting this clerical error. See United 

States v. Massey, 443 F.3d 814, 822 (11th Cir. 2006). 

Case: 14-13319 Date Filed: 07/20/2015 Page: 2 of 2
|                                         | 31.2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|---------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
|                                        
|I, Lisa Norman, certify that:           
|1.                                       | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Home Alliance Corporation.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|2.                                       | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.
|3.                                       | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results from operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.                





|By:  /s/Lisa NormanLisa Norman
Chief Financial Officer | Date:  October 24, 2012
|------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------
40 Occupational Outlook Quarterly ● Spring 2001

For more information, see Arlene Dohm’s article, “Gauging the labor force effects of retiring baby-boomers,” in the Monthly Labor Review,

July 2000, pages 17-25, available from the Superintendent of Documents, (202) 512-1800, or online at http://stats.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2000/

07/art2full.pdf. The data for this chart are from table 2, page 20.

Occupations with the greatest retiree

replacement needs, projected 1998-2008

Retiree replacement needs,

projected 1998-2000

Occupation (thousands)

519

425

418

408

378

331

330

195

178

175

Secretaries

Truckdrivers, heavy

Teachers, elementary school

Janitors and cleaners

Teachers, secondary school

Registered nurses

Bookkeeping, accounting, and auditing clerks

Teachers, college and university

Administrators, education and related fields

Farmers, except horticultural

The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects the aging of

“baby boomers”—persons born between 1946 and

1964—to increase the labor force proportion of

those aged 45 and older from 33 percent in 1998 to

40 percent in 2008. Occupations with large numbers

of workers who were 45 years old or older in 1998

are expected to have the greatest need to replace

workers who retire over the 1998-2008 decade.

The 10 occupations likely to be most affected by

baby-boomer retirements are all large occupations

with large proportions of boomers among their ranks.

Six of the occupations compose nearly half of the

employment in educational services: three teaching

occupations, janitors and cleaners, secretaries, and

educational administrators. Education occupations are

particularly likely to have large numbers of retirements

because workers in public education—like most public

sector employees—are covered by pensions that allow

retirement at age 55 for those with a required number

of years of service.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Stephen E. Gorman, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Greyhound Lines, Inc.and Subsidiaries; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 30, 2004    /s/ Stephen E. Gorman     Stephen E. Gorman, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Hon. William H. Walls

V. : Crim. No. 10-cr-876

TERIEK EDWARDS ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE

This matter having come before the Court on the joint

application of Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the

District of New Jersey (Rodney C. Villazor, Assistant U.S.

Attorney 1appearing), and defendant Teriek Edwards (Chester

Keller, Esq., appearing), for an order granting a continuance of

the proceedings in the above-captioned matter, and the defendant

being aware that he has the right to have the matter brought to

trial within 70 days of the date of his appearance before a

judicial officer of this court pursuant to Title 18 of the United

States Code, Section 3161(c) (1), four continuances having

previously been entered by this Court, and as the defendant has

consented to a second continuance, and for good and sufficient

cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should

be continued for the following reasons:

(1) The charges in this case involves numerous

witnesses that defense counsel requires adequate time to reviewand prepare for;
preparation in this matter;

(3) Plea negotiations are currently in progress, and

both the United States and the defendant desire additional time

to negotiate a plea agreement, which would render any grand jury

proceedings and any subsequent trial of this matter unnecessary;

(4) As a result of the foregoing, pursuant to Title

18, United States Code, Section 3161(h) (7), the ends of justice

served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interest of

the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS, therefore, on thisLL) day of December, 2011,

ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, continued

from January 23, 2012 through April 23, 2012; and it is further

ORDERED that the period from January 23, 2012 through

April 23, 2012 shall be excludable in computing time under the

Speedy Trial Act of 1974.

A /1

I

F

HON. WILL±A H. WALLSUnited States District Judge

-2-
Keller, Esq

Counsel for defendant Teriek Edwards
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00336-CV

Kenneth Hartman, Appellant

v.

Oakwood Acceptance Corporation, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, 335TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 11,565, HONORABLE H.R. TOWSLEE, JUDGE PRESIDING 

Appellant Kenneth Hartman has notified this Court that he no longer wishes to pursue his 

appeal and has moved to dismiss the appeal. We grant his motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.1(a)(2).

 

Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Dismissed on Appellant=s Motion

Filed: August 30, 2002

Do Not Publish
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 126 (Thursday, July 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15616]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. [thinsp]225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board 
has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and 
permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than July 17, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth Binning, Vice 
President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San 
Francisco, California 94105-1579:
    1. Chinatrust Capital Corporation, Torrance, California, and 
Chinatrust Financial Holding Company, Ltd., and Chinatrust Commercial 
Bank, Ltd., both of Taipei, Taiwan; to engage directly in extending 
credit and servicing loans pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1) of 
Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 29, 2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-15616 Filed 7-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 127 (Monday, July 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15748]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,371]


Computer Sciences Corporation, Foremost Account, 5600 Beech Tree 
Lane, Caledonia, MI; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on May 21, 2009 in response to a worker 
petition filed on behalf of workers of Computer Sciences Corporation, 
Foremost Account, Caledonia, Michigan.
    The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition 
(TA-W-70,340) filed on May 21, 2009 that is the subject of an ongoing 
investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of June 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-15748 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
905 A.2d 869

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JEFFREY C. BAKER, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

August 4, 2006.

ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted on the issue of defendant’s sentence, and the matter is summarily remanded to the trial court for resentencing in light of the Court’s decision in *State v. Pierce,*188 *N.J.*155, 902 A.2d 1195 (2006).
#### In the Matter of Harold Bell, Petitioner, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

[853 NYS2d 43]

The finding of nondesirability is supported by substantial evidence, including petitioner’s 2003 guilty plea to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree *(see Matter of Bradford v New York City Hous. Auth.,*34 AD3d 463 [2006]), and the testimony of a detective that, in July 2004, while executing a search warrant of petitioner’s apartment, he saw petitioner holding a gun, and found drugs and drug paraphernalia in the apartment *(see Harris v*Hernandez, 30 AD3d 269 [2006]). There exists no basis to disturb the hearing officer’s findings crediting the detective’s testimony *(see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,*70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]), and although the criminal charges pertaining to petitioner’s 2004 arrest were still pending at the time of the administrative hearing, respondent properly considered the underlying police documents in reaching its determination, notwithstanding the subsequent dismissal of those charges *(see Matter of Ono v Long Is. Coll. Hosp.,*12 AD3d 299 [2004]).

*285The penalty of termination does not shock our sense of fairness *(see Harris).*

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions, including that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at the administrative hearing, and find them unavailing. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.