alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 24

OWENS-ILLINOIS GROUP, INC.    POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That each individual whose signature appears below hereby consents to and appoints James W. Baehren as his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent with all power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the 2002 Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Owens-Illinois Group, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the
same, with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, granting
unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the same as fully
to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitute or substitutes, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has hereunto set his hand on the date set opposite his name.

|Signature                             |  | Title                                                                            |  | Date   
|------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------
|                                      |  |                                                                                  |  |        
|/s/JOSEPH H. LEMIEUXJoseph H. Lemieux |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)               |  | 3/27/03
|/s/THOMAS L. YOUNGThomas L. Young     |  | President (Principal Financial Officer); Director                                |  | 3/27/03
|/s/JAMES W. BAEHRENJames W. Baehren   |  | Vice President and Secretary; Director                                           |  | 3/27/03
|/s/EDWARD C. WHITEEdward C. White     |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer); Director |  | 3/27/03

---

QuickLinks
#### Esnidia Andrini, Respondent, v Frank Navarra et al., Appellants.

[856 NYS2d 145]

*576In order to prevail on their motion for summary judgment in this action involving a fall upon an allegedly defective stairway, the defendants were “ ‘required to establish as a matter of law that they maintained the property in question in a reasonably safe condition and that they neither created the allegedly dangerous condition existing thereon nor had actual or constructive notice thereof ” (see *Mokszki v Pratt,*13 AD3d 709, 710 [2004], quoting *Richardson v Rotterdam Sq. Mall,*289 AD2d 679, 679 [2001]; *Hyman v Queens County Bancorp,*307 AD2d 984, 986 [2003], *affd*3 NY3d 743 [2004]). To give rise to constructive notice, a defect must be visible and apparent and must exist for a sufficient length of time before the accident to permit the defendant to discover and remedy it (see *Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,*67 NY2d 836 [1986]). Only after the defendants have satisfied their threshold burden will the court examine the sufficiency of the plaintiffs opposition papers (see *Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851 [1985]; *Soto-Lopez v Board of Mgrs. of Crescent Tower Condominium,*44 AD3d 846 [2007]).

Here, the defendants failed to submit evidence sufficient to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Thus, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.P., Ritter, Garni and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
#### In re: James A. ROSE, III, Debtor. Algernon Lee Butler, III, Trustee in Bankruptcy for James A. Rose, III, Trustee—Appellant, v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee; Residential Funding Company, LLC, Defendants—Appellees, and William Walt Pettit, Defendant.

No. 10-1285.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 15, 2011.

Decided: March 21, 2011.

*245Algernon L. Butler, III, Butler & Butler, L.L.P., Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellant. Alan B. Powell, Christopher C. Finan, Roberson, Haworth & Reese, P.L.L.C., High Point, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Algernon L. Butler, III, as trustee in bankruptcy for the estate of James A. Rose, III, appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying the trustee’s motion seeking to invalidate — on the basis of a typographical error — the deed of trust currently held by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas on certain real property of the estate. The bankruptcy court and the district court held that a bona fide purchaser would have been on notice as to the error in the deed and, therefore, the trustee may not avoid the lien under 11 U.S.C. § 544(a) (2006). We have reviewed the record included on appeal, the parties’ briefs, and all supplemental materials before the court and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated below. *In re Rose (Butler v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co.),*Nos. 7:09-cv-00145-FL; L-08-00080-8-AP, 2009 WL 2226658 (E.D.N.C. July 20, 2009); (Feb. 9, 2010). We deny the Appellant’s motion for reconsideration of this court’s order entered June 10, 2010, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(b)

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Welllman International Limited:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-17196, 33-44822, 33-44877, 33-44876, 33-22459, 33-38491, 33-54075,
33-54079, 33-54077, 333-47833, 333-28273, 333-38752, 333-62568, 333-62572 and
333-117017) on Form S-8 and in Registration Statements (Nos. 33-36001, 333-60175
and 333-121743) on Form S-3 of Wellman, Inc. of our reports dated 11 March 2005,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Welllman International
Limited as of 31 December 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, stockholders' equity and other comprehensive income (loss), and
cash flows, for each of the years in the three-year period ended 31 December
2004, and management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of 31 December 2004 and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2004, which reports appear in
the 31 December 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Wellman, Inc.

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
REGISTERED AUDITORS

Dublin, Ireland
15 March 2005
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03 - 23 - 00856 - CV
R. R. and A. C. , Appellant v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee
FROM THE 340TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY NO. C - 23 - 0001 - CPS , THE HONORABLE ELIZ A BETH WATKINS , JUDGE PRESIDING 

### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03 - 24 - 00069 - CV
A. C. , Appellant v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee
FROM THE 340TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY NO. C230001CPS , THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH WATKINS , JUDGE PRESIDING
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellants R.R. (Father) and A.C. (Mother) each filed a notice of appeal fro m the trial court ’s oral ruling on December 13, 2023 , terminating their parental righ ts to t heir child
.2 The trial court subsequently entered a written final termination order on January 2, 2024, consist ent with its previous oral ruling. Mother then filed a second notice of appeal from that writt en order. On this Court’s own motion, we c onsolida te for all purposes the appeal in cause number 03
- 2 4
- 00 069
- CV with the appeal in cause number 03
- 23
- 00 856
- CV. Accordingly, all records and documents filed in cause number 03
- 2 4
- 00 069
- CV are consolidated into cause number 03
- 23
- 00 856
- CV. The conso lidated appeal shall proceed under cause number 03
- 23
- 00 856
- CV, and cause number 03
- 2 4
- 00 069
- CV is hereby dismissed
. See Guyaux
v. Walnut Springs Homeowners Ass ’ n, Inc. , No. 03
- 20
- 00584
- CV, 2021 WL 162503, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Jan. 5, 2021, no pet.) (m em. op.)
.

__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne , Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Smith and T h eofanis 03
- 2 4
- 00069
- CV Dismissed 03
- 23
- 00856
- CV Consolidated Filed: February 21 , 2024
##### 



COMMON SHARESPharmacy Benefits Manager NATIONAL MEDICAL HEALTH CARD SYSTEMS, INC. CUSIP 63918l 30 2 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THIS CERTIFIES THAT SPECIMEN IS THE OWNER OF FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, PAR VALUE $.001 PER SHARE, OF transferable only on the
certifilate properly endorsed. This certificate and the shares represenyed hereby issued and
shall l%e|held subject to all the provisions of the certificateir If the Corporation and and
amendments thereto to all of whichthe holder of certificate by acceptance hereof asents.
This Certificates is not valid unless countersigned registered by the Transfer. Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly
authorized officers. NATIONAL MEDICAL HEALTH CARD SYSTEM, INC, CORPORATE SEAL 2001 Dated: CORPORATE SECRETARY CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD




---



##### 



The Corporation will furnish to any shareholder, upon request and without charge, a
full statement of the designation, relative rights, preferences, and limitations of the shares of each class of stock of the Corporation
authorized to be issued and the designation, relative rights, preferences, and
limitations of each series of Preferred Shares so far as they have been fixed by the
Board of Directors of the Corporation pursuant to authority heretofore granted to it. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:  .  TEN COM  as tenants in common            UNIF GIFT MIN ACT- ...... Custodian
TENENT   as tenants by the entireties (Cust) (Minor);
JT TEN   as joint tenants with right of            under Uniform Gifts to Minors
survivorship and not as tenants            Act
in common (Stale)
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.  .
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)  * . » Signature(s) Guaranteed: STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN
APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
Exhibit 31

      Statement Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
         By Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
       Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings


I, Steven N. Bronson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
September 30, 2007;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

        a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
        material information relating to the registrant is made known to me by
        others, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
        being prepared;

        b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
        and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
        this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

        c) presented in this annual report my conclusions about the
        effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my
        evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the registrant's board of directors:

        a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
        controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified
        for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal
        controls; and

        b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
        controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: December 21, 2007

                                            /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Steven N. Bronson, President
911 A.2d 64

#### TOWNSHIP OF HOLMDEL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NEW JERSEY HIGHWAY AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-MOVANT.

November 9, 2006.

ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal is granted.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

In connection with the Annual Report ofCalgon Carbon Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the periodending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Leroy M. Ball, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.

|   |   | Leroy M.   Ball           |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   |   |                           |
|   |   | Chief   Financial Officer |
|   |   | April 25,   2007          |

(A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Calgon Carbon Corporation and will be retained by Calgon Carbon Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.)

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

----
#### Orlando MARTINEZ, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 12-2348.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: March 21, 2013.

Filed: March 26, 2013.

Orlando Martinez, Youngstown, OH, pro se.

Julia M. Wright, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellee.

Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Orlando Martinez appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion to return property. After careful review, *see Jackson v. United States,*526 F.3d 394, 396 (8th Cir.2008), we conclude that the motion was properly denied for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT ANA GONZALEZ-C R

UZ, AKA Ade lfa C ruz , Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 14-71776 Age n c y No. A200-694-889 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 20, 2016 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, TASHIM A, a nd NGUYEN, C irc uit Judge s. Ana Gonz a le z -C ruz , a

native and c i tiz e n

of M e xic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ orde r dism issing he r a ppe a l from an im m igration judge ’ s de c i sion de ny i ng he r m otion to re ope n re m ova l proc e e dings c onduc te d in a

bse ntia . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w 

# FIL ED JAN 27 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).for a

b use of disc re tion thede nia l of a m otion to re ope n, M

ohamme d v . Gonzale

s , 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th C ir. 2005), a n d we de ny

the pe tition for re vie w . The a ge n c y

did not a b u se its disc re tion in deny ing Gonz a l e z -C ruz ’ s m otion to re ope n. Gonz a le z -C ruz wa s pe rsona lly se rve d with thehe a

ring notic e for he r July 10, 2012, he aring, a

nd fa ile d to show tha

t e xc e ptiona l c irc um sta

nc e s c a use d he r to m iss he r July

10, 2012, he aring, whe re the de c la ration a c c om

pa ny ing he r m otion to re o pe n a sse rts tha t a n offic e r from

the Inte nsive Supe rvision Appe aran c e Program inform e d he r tha

t he r June 2012 he aring wa s c anc e lle d. Se e8 C .F.R . § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii); K

han v . Ashc roft , 374 F.3d 825, 828 (9th C ir. 2004) (a c tua l notic e is suffic ie nt to m e e t due proc e ss re quire m e nts); 8 U.S.C . § 1229a (e )(1) (de fining the

te rm “ e xc e ptiona l c irc um sta

nc e s” ). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 4 - 7 1 7 7 6 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MORRISON INFORMATICS, INC.,

ANTHONY M. GRIGONIS AND

MALCOLM H. MORRISON

 v.

MEMBERS 1ST FEDERAL CREDIT

UNION, MARK ZAMPELLI, SCOTT

DOUGLASS

PETITION OF: MEMBERS 1ST

FEDERAL CREDIT UNION

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 664 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

(1) When an action is instituted by one who undisputedly lacks the capacity

and legal right to bring the claims asserted and preliminary objections are

properly sustained on that basis, should the action be dismissed with no

leave to amend because no proper plaintiff is before the court?

(2) When an action is instituted by one who undisputedly lacks the capacity

and legal right to bring the claims asserted and preliminary objections are

properly sustained on that basis, can leave be granted to amend the

caption after the statute of limitations expires to substitute one who does

have the capacity and legal right to bring the action?
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of DOR BioPharma, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








DOR BIOPHARMA,
INC.





April
      24, 2008
            by:
            /s/ Evan MyrianthopoulosEvan
      MyrianthopoulosChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
CHIEF JUSTICE

 CAROLYN WRIGHT

JUSTICES

 DAVID L. BRIDGES

 MOLLY FRANCIS

 DOUGLAS S. LANG

 ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

 ROBERT M. FILLMORE

 LANA MYERS

 DAVID EVANS

 DAVID LEWIS

 ADA BROWN

 CRAIG STODDART

 BILL WHITEHILL

 DAVID J. SCHENCK

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

600 COMMERCE STREET, SUITE 200

DALLAS, TEXAS 75202

(214) 712-3400

LISA MATZ

CLERK OF THE COURT

(214) 712-3450

lisa.matz@5th.txcourts.gov

GAYLE HUMPA

BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR

(214) 712-3434

gayle.humpa@5th.txcourts.gov

FACSIMILE

(214) 745-1083

INTERNET

HTTP://5TH.TXCOURTS.GOV

July 23, 2015

Ryan Anderson

112 E. Pecan Str.

Suite 777

San Antonio, TX 78205

Georganna Simpson

1349 Empire Central Dr.

Woodview Tower, Suite 600

Dallas, TX 75247

RE: 05-12-00451-CV

In the Interest of Z.Z.B. and S.M.B., Children

Counsel:

This interlocutory appeal has been abated since May 16, 2012 due to the 

filing of bankruptcy by appellant Stephen Aaron Bergenholtz. Since that date, we 

have had no correspondence regarding the status of the bankruptcy proceedings. 

The Courts records, however, reflect that since the filing of bankruptcy and 

abatement of the appeal, the Court has had four other cases filed by Mr. 

Bergenholtz regarding the same trial court number. They are as follows:

05-13-01228-CV, In re Stephen Aaron Bergenholtz (Original Mandamus 

Proceeding)

05-13-00261-CV, In the Interest of S.M.B., A Child 

05-14-00732-CV, In re Stephen Aaron Bergenholtz (Original Mandamus 

Proceeding)

05-14-00745-CV, In the Interest of S.M.B., A Child (Opinion issued July 1, 2015)

Thus, it appears the bankruptcy proceedings which resulted in the abatement of 

the appeal in cause no. 05-12-00451-CV are closed and the appeal should be 

reinstated for further disposition.
Therefore, the parties are directed to notify the Court, within TEN DAYS

of the date of this letter, why the interlocutory appeal in cause no. 05-12-00451-

CV should not be reinstated and set for dismissal due to the entry of a final 

judgment, which was referenced in the appeal in 05-14-00745-CV. Failure to 

respond will result in this Court reinstating the appeal and dismissing the appeal 

without further notice.

Sincerely,

/s/ Lisa Matz, Clerk of the Court

cc: Frank O. Carroll, III, 2800 Post Oak Blvd., 57th Floor, Houston, TX 77056

Stephen Aaron Bergenholtz, P.O. Box 250449, Plano, TX 75025

Howard Shapiro, P.O. Box 861720, Plano, TX 75086-1720

ltr:mrh