alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Alberf ayaIa j JW w sm Ja6jcIAU

*' % btsmia ce>u<r op FILED IN

THE SttTC 0? T«A5 $ 5A,iAs Cou„n . rCOURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUL 24 2015

MoT/oji TO <;u$p£Wk ftmf 9.3(b) . of the Teif<\s ames of ftfputtvFE PftoctDuRtftbel Acostai C|erk

to TWe ^u^e of S&ed CfiuHt

m& ftespgcrfutw -fues Tviis rvisRosj to sus?emo ^,3is) of the Texas

flues of (Wellkte WocEixeE.-n^uG.H the AUTHoenry of rule z or TUtrrExte

&ULcS OF (vpft'Lurre Procedure ftWD wxu_swou> tucs srtd ooutfT the foUoojxiug'-

PEnniONEK T3 Fxixng Hxs ?ETXtxdw FoR mscttinxoNft«y Rlfvart'iM PRO St, TfU

the toutrr o? CJtiivAxwaL (\PPe&ls fodTtfe follows Reason*, P(Tnxo<vifcfc RtsPeoruuy

PtSKS THE CCUCTTO SUSpeiUD ^L(f ^.3 C6) '

J-. PCT!CT3:o(U£ft XS Fxixwfa PROSE, MOD

*!.f£Tr^xooj£& IsXcJOMiLCcftRTeTs -x<u-vU£"~T£5toS T>EPf\RXP*fai\Jr OF CfcT^ru-xfueu JU-srxct

ftWD -DOESiUCv HAVE [VCCESST0 f\ C&W M(\CKri\Jt,

pTTO^eR HftS SHOWM 6CXID CRUS* ftft. APPELLATE tfULt ALLOU^C APPei^ffrif

f^ocesx^G TviE crsf W^ ^PUiar*& a rUL£ ^ll ftcru FftCt £

^0 OftBS> oro THes Trtel^L XM 0P TULV

iZOlS

ftSPECttuuY SUetvarrreD

(\\GERX fWftift

IS>C ^J-D^*^ZS3C(0

ftLLL CLEfiyieArrs ururr

%&. spur stj_

ftMW^LLD.TEXWS. 7^(07
CERXxHrCATiT Of SERWDX

tt HefcEM Cfc-ffTXFy THAT (\T(lU£ CON Of THE F6R£fote(Vt. fWonOrU TO ^JL£pei^

fUlc ^C&Vt-UVS 6EEW S££VED OfMTHt ASSKTTAtur TJEKTCTCr ATTORrvJfcY FOP. Ti^LLAS

CfcUwrt -attain secxoo.u, FltawK «ouiiey Coum Buildup LOCK GOV i<f,

T&OAS CbujvjiY-aefELCftre £eectt>fu,Trtu*srce>r<vs -7szo-|-43in 0^ -Defosx-OKUG

^""^ UW3TCD ^^ rv\ftxL ftenube WPftXT^ OrVTKTS TWt

TDMMftTt- ~DcCU\£<tTxoro

TM^T *TMTM- o**TM^ or c«x«=rt.L ,UTO£l

PfTrrxcxoER, PR5 St
Exhibit
32.01





CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I,
Michael Neufeld, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Pegasi Energy Resources Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Pegasi Energy Resources Corporation.




By:
            
            /s/    MICHAEL
      NEUFELDDate:
      May 13, 2009
            
            Name:
            
            Michael
      NeufeldTitle:
            
            Chief Executive Officer




I,
Richard Lindermanis, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Pegasi Energy Resources Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Pegasi Energy Resources Corporation.




By:
            
            /s/    RICHARD
      LINDERMANISDate:
      May 13, 2009
            
            Name:
            
            Richard
      LindermanisTitle:
            
            Chief
      Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CHAMBERS OF MARTIN LUTHER KING COURTHOUSE

JOSEPH A. DICKSON 50 WALNUT STREET

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE NEWARK, NJ 07101

(973) 645-2580

Date: 3/2/11

LETTER ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 16

Re: Case Name: Richard Nagle v. Board of Trustees of the District Council

Of Northern NJ Iron Workers Annuity Fund, et al.

Civil Action No. 10-6818 (DMC)

Dear Counsel:

A scheduling conference shall be conducted before the undersigned on 4/11/11 at 11:00 a.m.

in Courtroom 5A, Martin Luther KingCourthouse Building, 50 Walnut Street,Newark, New Jersey. 

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16.1 and L.Civ.R. 16.1(a).

Counsel are advised that the early disclosure requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 will be

enforced. Therefore, counsel shall immediately exchange the following information without a

formal discovery request:

• contested facts,

• identities of individuals likely to have knowledge of discoverable facts,

• documents and things in the possession of counsel or the party,

• identities of experts and their opinions,

• insurance agreements in force, and

• statement of the basis for any damages claimed.

At least fourteen (14) days prior to the conference scheduled herein, counsel shall personally

meet and confer pursuant to Fed .R. Civ .P. 26(f), and shall submit a discovery plan to the

undersigned not later than 72 hours prior to the conference with the Court. The discovery plan may

include a summary of the status of settlement negotiations.

Case 2:10-cv-06818-DMC -JAD Document 15 Filed 03/02/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 122
At the conference with the Court, all parties who are not appearing pro se must be

represented by counsel who shall have full authority to bind their client in all pretrial matters. 

Clients or persons with authority over the matter shall be available by telephone. See L. Civ.R.

16.1(a).

Counsel for plaintiff(s) shall notify any party who hereafter enters an appearance of

the above conference and forward to that party a copy of this Order. 

The parties must advise this Court immediately if this action has been settled or terminated

so that the above conference may be cancelled.

Failure to comply with the terms herein may result in the imposition of sanctions. 

SO ORDERED.

 s/ Joseph A. Dickson 

Joseph A. Dickson

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Hon. Dennis M. Cavanaugh, USDJ

2

Case 2:10-cv-06818-DMC -JAD Document 15 Filed 03/02/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 123
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6004

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HERBERT J. ROTHBERG,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District

Judge. (CR-90-405-A, CA-95-655-AM)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 3, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory B. English, ENGLISH & SMITH, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, David G.

Barger, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Herbert J. Rothberg seeks to appeal the district court's order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) motion. Specifically,

Rothberg claims that the district court committed reversible error

by dismissing the motion without the benefit of an evidentiary

hearing. See Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings, Rule 8. A district

court need not conduct such a hearing where the facts are not in

dispute. See, e.g., Foster v. Barbour, 613 F.2d 59, 60-61 (4th Cir.

1980). Rothberg has not identified any factual dispute that could

have been resolved at a hearing and our review of the record reveals none. The district court did not err in dismissing the motion

without a hearing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
SCWC-16-0000890 and SCWC-17-0000216

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

________________________________________________________________

PRUDENTIAL LOCATIONS, LLC, 

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

LORNA GAGNON and PRESTIGE REALTY

GROUP LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,

Petitioners/Defendants/Cross-Claim Defendants-Appellees,

and

RE/MAX LLC and LORRAINE CLAWSON,

Respondents/Defendants/Cross-Claimants/

Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees,

and

KEVIN TENGAN,

Respondent/Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-16-0000890 & CAAP-17-0000216; CIV. NO. 13-1-2328)

ORDER GRANTING APPELLEES LORNA GAGNON AND PRESTIGE REALTY GROUP 

LIMITED LIAB[I]LITY COMPANY’S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF THE 

OPINION OF THE COURT BY MCKENNA, J., FILED ON FEBRUARY 17, 2022

(By: McKenna, Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Morikawa)

Upon consideration of Appellees Lorna Gagnon and Prestige 

Realty Group Limited Liab[i]lity Company’s Motion for 

Clarification of the Opinion of the Court by McKenna, J., filed 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-16-0000890

31-MAR-2022

02:49 PM

Dkt. 92 OGMR
2

on February 17, 2022, filed February 28, 2022 (the “motion”), 

and the attachments thereto; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted and an 

amended opinion changing only the final paragraph of the opinion 

shall issue.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, March 31, 2022.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Trish K. Morikawa
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         162,196
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             689
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    473,852
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         513,724
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           524,022
<LOANS>                                      1,745,589
<ALLOWANCE>                                     39,260
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,222,798
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,753,475
<SHORT-TERM>                                   466,354
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            408,870
<LONG-TERM>                                    296,360
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,563
<OTHER-SE>                                     273,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,222,798
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                162,394
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               54,037
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 5,662
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               222,093
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             101,364
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             139,279
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           82,814
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   11,470
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,829
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                115,433
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,571
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      33,428
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,428
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.35
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.16
<LOANS-NON>                                     18,400
<LOANS-PAST>                                       526
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                23,622
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                41,323
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   19,187
<RECOVERIES>                                     4,754
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               39,260
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

RONNIE R. ZVOLENSKY, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

PA. BOARD OF PROBATION AND 

PAROLE; PAROLE COUNSEL; PAROLE 

AGENT BROOKS (SCI-DALLAS); 

PAROLE AGENT STRICKLAND (SCIDALLAS); PAROLE AGENT HOLLCOME 

(SCI- DALLAS); PAROLE AGENT 

MICHAEL NOVACK (SCRANTON 

OFFICE); PAROLE AGENT ROBERT 

JONES (REGENAL [SIC] DIRECTOR); 

(SCRANTON OFFICE); PAROLE AGENT 

DOUG SHAFFER (SCRANTON OFFICE); 

PAROLE AGENT CHRIS TAYLOR 

(SCRANTON OFFICE), 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 88 MM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in post-effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-7053 on Form S-8, in RegistrationStatement Nos. 33-44700, 333-44024 and 333-46218 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 17, 2004 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the restatement described in Note 25) appearing in theAnnual Report on Amendment No. 3 to Form 10-K/A of Archon Corporation for the year ended September 30, 2003. 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP 

Las Vegas, Nevada 

February 27, 2004
509-/5

ORIGINAL

£.A/ TUG COUffr" of C/?/kWl/./>9L BPf^ftL-S

OF TFX/1S

app*//<W JUL 24 2015

..VS.

rue srfir&- of rexes,

ftrsf>c> nden h

A^Acosta, Clerk

f\?PeLLfl/s/rs PiTjrio/J fo$ piscr$e/oji//}fiY rgvizu)

o f -fHe stare o r r&xss

tLj^ jop/e^/r)« rt>$ic//}L Disrwc-r

Ar. dP^ir**', r^> *s FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUL 24 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk

fDCj-#./S?(3^f/
PART I as

TcrMULSS £^ Colony• f*s<q$

TRIAL PRQSffcuroRi

&zs)sk}nl District-A tfa+tocy Harris (u>^yt r<txQ£

ri&ioste»n.re.XQs 7~7&e>1.

AHornby q! Lqu>

I9&& a/-. Loop u)e,r-/

Qoh u*ic&PF

Tits' kWiy DmVe.

\te>\>shbv\, fcx 4S ?7ocr

T-SZ*J Ois+ncfi C-ouA

tZP\ f>0K>£/iV , /6tl Floor

Ifcus/ohy 7~e*QS -77<3^>Z.
TABLg Ojf_C.OA/f^A/rs

X^a^x of F\[AHoRifi^S i

SZST&JA&A'T f O/? ORAL A ft &om FasT //V

STftremtfAjT of TH& l/)$gt in

StSJL&mfAtfLQfL /°/?oxe DuRAl HisTotty ill

TU<z Appall%}<L Qyr-g'o-CS /lW Me C*u// &p Af*f>tQ)S

e/^ed In M-c>V* de~^is?or\ fa_AciC£pL_£(o<l A^/e on 4

frivolous and dt-Ptofenr applet) brief ky Qpp<zJL$ht

Counsel uJU# raised 4 claim of £nz?Fz.chj'& .jQssrsfante.

oF C&vnSiL.} loosed &Y) AKe- 0/)eYO Sofe e-rr&r oP #n

unf/me/y ely&sJ'/hn fW vOuS /W preseti/ed at- f-ri^i

Pop Qpp&lhkt /^weto.

\ffcurfSA/y/h Qosjft of /jppeals OplniO^C\
. e60£oZ-iJii3 ^___ c;

/*3 US, 77£ fi>ciZ~7) -

7.10 XW. 3dl J"^3ff^y^ CHw /?^ 24a?) /

£64 £u>* 2.J IIO (feX 4pp. -Houston Hit) <l

£ vi Its I/, £UCJLy r

l&f £.ci.$3o C/qgs"} <7

Cr Q.sS-JLLsS'teihz. i

7j££L£!\2.*..'2.d <?3&

3

6&i ^td.-zd 3i"V - 7

3g && •3a 71$ If*** C«ri <*> 4pp» 2.00}")

(
CAS? Z- Pflfrei

iVV >£ w3<( 5g3Cf.ZX* L\Aw\, /)|y.: LocW^ /©

US. v, srfeue-h Si

3^ F 3cJ /6'7 7

mi && 3d /7£> 7

/3^^tJ 3d ^r fz-ao^ . 3

rex,c6or o/W^prac* /3r/. z^..// s/£

HeX. C^>0^ c<ri"wN_ firocx Ay^. J<£>~^7 7

.<l>"X £s /9/»p, ff?c>c> /Po/e. 33. I d»W33,/0O /,</

rex. fts Apr* fRot, /Tu/e 3e\? W. 3tfv? fo/O' ^-V;m

/I
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/  Jay      W. Shreiner |
|--------|-------------------------------------|
|   | Jay      W. Shreiner                |
|   | Executive      Vice President,      |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer        |
|   | RehabCare      Group, Inc.          |
|   | March      8, 2010                  |
1995 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

6-22-1995

Squires v Bonser

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 94-7035

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1995 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Squires v Bonser" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 123.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/123
_ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 _______________ 

No. 94-7035 _______________ 

JOSEPH SQUIRES, SR. Appellant 

V. 

THOMAS BONSER; JAY E. HUFFMAN; MIDDLE SMITHFIELD TOWNSHIP 

Appellees _______________ 

Before: BECKER and COWEN, Circuit Judges and POLLAK, District 

Judge* 

 _______________ 

ORDER _______________ 

 The petition for panel rehearing is granted and the 

opinion filed on May 8, 1995, is amended by adding a footnote 17 

at the final word of the opinion's text ("damages"), such 

footnote to be as follows: 

17. At the new trial the jury is to be instructed 

that its award of compensatory damages cannot exceed 

$37,100. 

By the Court, 

 \s\ Louis H. Pollak

District Judge 

Dated: June 22, 1995 

__________________ 

*Honorable Louis H. Pollak, United States District Judge for the 

Eastern District of Penndylvania, sitting by designation.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 127 (Monday, July 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15758]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,678]

Quality Metal Coatings, Inc., 122 Access Road, P.O. Box 427, 
Saint Mary's, PA; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on May 28, 2009 in response to a worker 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Quality 
Metal Coatings, Inc., Saint Mary's, Pennsylvania.
    The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition 
(TA-W-70,639) filed on May 27, 2009 that is the subject of an ongoing 
investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of June 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-15758 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
# table170_q16.6_state
NO. 01-15-00258-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

IN THE INTEREST OF M.M-Y.P., CHILD

S.L.R., Appellant

v.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES,

Appellee

OnAppeal from the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-00702J

APPELLANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION

OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

S.L.R, appellant, moves the Court to extend the time to file her reply

briefto Monday, July 20, 2015 and in support thereofrespectfully shows:

1. In an order dated July 9, 2015, the Court requested that appellant

file a reply briefto address whether her motion for new trial should be

treated as a judicial admission regarding her interest in terminating her

parental rights. Appellant was given until Friday, July 17, 2015 to file her

reply brief.

ACCEPTED

01-15-00258-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/17/2015 4:00:34 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/17/2015 4:00:34 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
2. Good cause exists to grant this motion. Within the last ten days

appellant's counsel represented the mother in the trial ofacase involving the

termination ofparental rights in cause no. 2014-00610-CV; styled: In re

J.G., et al, in the 313th District Court and prepared for atrial scheduled for

July 16, 2015 where he represents the respondent charged with the first

degree felony offense of aggravated sexual assault in cause no. 2013-00545-

CV; styled: In the Matter ofD. W.\ in the 315th District Court. In addition,

on July 16, 2015, he was appointed to as the attorney ad litem for the

children who are placed in foster care in cause no. 2015-04311J; styled: In

re X.H., etal, inthe 315th District Court. He isscheduled to visit the

children on Friday, July 17, 2015.

3. This extension is not sought for the purposes ofdelay but rather so

that the ends ofjustice may be served.

WHEREFORE, S.L.R., appellant, prays that this motion be granted

and that the time to file her reply brief be extended to Monday, July 20,

2015.

Respectfully submitted,

Isi william m thursland

William M. Thursland

TBN: 20016200

440 Louisiana St., Ste. 1130

Houston, TX 77002
Email: wmthursland@hotmail.com

(713) 655-0200 x 105; Fax: (713) 655-9035

Attorney for Appellant, S.L.R.

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Pursuant to TRAP 10.1(a)(5), I certify that appellee's counsel, Sandra

D. Hachem, is unopposed to this motion.

Isi william m thursland

William M. Thursland

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing pleading was

served on Sandra D. Hachem by electronic delivery or by fax to: (713) 437-

4700 on July 17,2015.

Isi william m thursland

William M. Thursland
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Frank W. Smith, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the report of Entech Solar, Inc. (formerly WorldWater & Solar Technologies Corp.) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operation of Entech Solar, Inc. (formerly WorldWater & Solar Technologies Corp.).

By:

/s/ FRANK W. SMITHName:

Frank W. SmithTitle:

Principal Executive Officer


Dated:
March 16, 2009

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This
certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

---



QuickLinks