alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
60 Occupational Outlook Quarterly • Spring 2010

Pharmacy

technicians

When it comes to employment, one of the healthiest 

occupational groups is...well, healthcare. More than 7 

million workers were employed in these occupations in 

May 2008, second only to education-related occupations. 

But, as data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics 

(BLS) show, there is diversity—in both employment levels 

and in wages—among healthcare occupations.

The chart highlights May 2008 employment and 

wages for selected healthcare occupations. (For example, 

doctors and dentists, many of whom are self-employed, are 

excluded.) Registered nurse was the occupation with the 

most jobs—more than 2.5 million. And registered nurses’ 

median annual wage of $62,450 was among the highest 

of occupations with more than a million workers. More 

than half the occupations shown had median annual wages 

above $32,390, the national median for all occupations 

Workers and wages in selected healthcare occupations 

in May 2008. Pharmacists topped the list with a median 

annual wage of $106,410.

As they have in the recent past, healthcare occupations 

will continue to grow; all of the occupations shown are 

projected to experience faster than average growth over the 

2008–18 decade. Registered nurses are expected to add the 

most new jobs between 2008 and 2018, followed by home 

health aides. 

Data in the chart come from the Occupational Employment Statistics survey. For more information, write to the 

Division of Occupational Employment Statistics, Suite 

2135, 2 Massachusetts Avenue NE., Washington, D.C. 

20212; call (202) 691-6569; or visit its Web site at 

www.bls.gov/oes. To learn more about the 2008–18 

projections, visit www.bls.gov/emp.

0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000

$0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000

$100,000

$120,000

Registered

nurses

Nursing aides,

orderlies,

attendants

Home

health

aides

Licensed practical nurses and 

licensed vocational nurses

Pharmacists

Physical therapists

Dental hygienists

Radiologic technologists and technicians

Medical

assistants

Employment (size of circle represents employment)

Median annual wages

Employment and wages in selected healthcare practitioner and technical occupations 

and healthcare support occupations, May 2008
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-05-001-CV

IN RE RUTH JACKSON	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator's emergency command of writ of injunction and writ of certiorari with a notorial certificate and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator's  emergency command of writ of injunction and writ of certiorari with a notorial certificate  is denied.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL B: DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: January 5, 2005
EXHIBIT 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF BNP RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                    State of                       Business
               Subsidiary Name                    Organization                       Name
----------------------------------------------- ------------------ ------------------------------------------
<S>                                            <C>                <C>
BNP Residential Properties                      Delaware           Same
   Limited Partnership

Subsidiaries of BNP Residential Properties Limited Partnership:
BNP Realty, LLC                                 North Carolina     Allerton Place Apartments
                                                                   Harris Hill Apartments
                                                                   Madison Hall Apartments
                                                                   Oak Hollow Apartments
                                                                   Paces Village Apartments
                                                                   Summerlyn Place Apartments
                                                                   The Harrington Apartments
                                                                   Woods Edge Apartments
Barrington Place Associates, LLC                North Carolina     Barrington Place Apartments
BNP/Brookford Place, LLC                        Delaware           Brookford Place Apartments
BNP Chason Ridge, LLC                           North Carolina     Chason Ridge Apartments
BNP/Chrysson Phase I, LLC                       North Carolina     Abbington Place Apartments
                                                                   Pepperstone Apartments
                                                                   Savannah Place Apartments
                                                                   Waterford Place Apartments
BNP/Harbour, LLC                                North Carolina     Marina Shores Waterfront Apartments
BNP/Oakbrook, LLC                               Delaware           Oakbrook Apartments
BNP/PC Annex, LLC                               North Carolina     Same
BNP/Paces Commons, LLC                          Delaware           Paces Commons Apartments
BNP Residential Management                      North Carolina     Same
   Services, LLC
BNP/The Place, LLC                              South Carolina     Same

Subsidiary of BNP Realty, LLC:
BNP Management, Inc.                            North Carolina     Same




</TABLE>



                                       64
<PAGE>
[891 NYS2d 588]

#### Meir Sharoni, Respondent, v Jessica Villaplana, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

October 23, 2009

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Jessica Villaplana,*appellant pro se. *Meir Sharoni,*respondent pro se.

*7OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the judgment, insofar as appealed from, is reversed without costs and judgment is directed to be entered dismissing the complaint as against defendant Jessica Villaplana.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover a real estate commission allegedly due him upon the sale of premises owned by defendant Joseph Paino. After a nonjury trial, the Civil Court found that plaintiff had produced a buyer who was ready, willing and able to purchase the premises and awarded plaintiff judgment in the sum of $10,500 against all of the named defendants in this action. This appeal by defendant Jessica Villaplana ensued. On appeal, Villaplana contends that the judgment against her should be reversed since she was not a party to the commission agreement and was merely an agent for Re-max.

“When an agent acts on behalf of a disclosed principal, the agent will not be personally liable for a breach of contract unless there is clear and explicit evidence of the agent’s intention to be personally bound” *(Weinreb v Stinchfield,*19 AD3d 482, 483 [2005]). The evidence established that defendant Jessica Villaplana was merely an agent of “Remax,” the realty company involved with the sale of the premises owned by defendant Joseph Paino and purchased by defendant Marcus Lee on September 15, 2006. The evidence further established that the agreement to pay real estate commissions on the sale of the Paino property was between plaintiff, Joseph Paino, Remax and Dominic Ali. Villaplana was merely an agent for a disclosed principal, and there was no proof demonstrating her intention to be personally liable with respect to said commission. Accordingly, the judgment, insofar as appealed from, is reversed and judgment is directed to be entered dismissing the complaint as against defendant Villaplana.

Pesce, PJ., Weston and Rios, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1



STRATEX NETWORKS, INC.



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Stratex Networks, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Charles D. Kissner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of
Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 27, 2004 |  | /s/ Charles D. Kissner 
|                   |  | Charles D. Kissner     
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-4396

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DEJUAN ANDERKO WATKINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CR-02-106-FO)

Submitted: December 17, 2003 Decided: February 2, 2004

Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, G. Alan DuBois,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M.

Hayes, Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorneys,

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Dejuan Anderko Watkins appeals his conviction, after a

jury trial, for attempting to possess with intent to distribute

cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000).

On appeal, Watkins contends that his uncorroborated

confession is insufficient to support his conviction. After a

careful review of the record, we conclude that there was

substantial independent evidence to corroborate Watkins’

confession, and the evidence as a whole proved Watkins’ guilt

beyond a reasonable doubt. Smith v. United States, 348 U.S. 147,

156 (1954).

Watkins also contends that there was insufficient

evidence to support his conviction because he did not take a

substantial step towards the completion of the offense. We

disagree. The record clearly establishes that Watkins took several

substantial steps toward the completion of the crime. See United

States v. Neal, 78 F.3d 901, 906 (4th Cir. 1996).

Accordingly, viewing the evidence in a light most

favorable to the Government, and assuming that the jury resolved

all contradictions in the testimony in favor of the Government, we

conclude that the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to

sustain Watkins’ conviction. Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S.

60, 80 (1942); United States v. Sun, 278 F.3d 302, 313 (4th Cir.

2002); United States v. Burgos, 94 F.3d 849, 862 (4th Cir. 1996).
- 3 -

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Hon. Katharine S. Hayden

v. : Criminal No. 10-835 (KSH)

RICKY BOYD : ORDER

These matters having come before the Court upon the motions in limine of the United 

States, by Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney (Lee M. Cortes, Jr., Assistant United States 

Attorney, appearing), for an Order to Limit the Cross-Examination of Detectives Emanuel 

Pereira and Juan Ramos of the Newark Police Department and for an Order to Admit Evidence 

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 404(b) and 609(a)(1), and the motion in limine of 

defendant Ricky Boyd, (Patrick McMahon, Esq., appearing) for an Order to Compel the 

Disclosure of the Grand Jury Testimony of Joseph Leon Alexander, and the Court having 

presided over these motions at a hearing conducted on November 21, 2011, and consistent with 

the Court’s opinion that was delivered orally to the parties on November 21, 2011, 

IT IS, on this 22nd day of November, 2011,

ORDERED that the motion in limine of the United States to Limit the Cross-Examination 

of Detectives Emanuel Pereira and Juan Ramos is hereby GRANTED; and it is further 

ORDERED that the motion in limine of the United States to Admit Evidence Pursuant to 

Federal Rules of Evidence 404(b) and 609(a)(1) is hereby GRANTED; and it is further 

ORDERED that the motion in limine of defendant RICKY BOYD to Compel the 

Disclosure of the Grand Jury Testimony of Joseph Leon Alexander is hereby GRANTED in part 

and DENIED in part; and it is further

Case 2:10-cr-00835-KSH Document 33 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 269
ORDERED that the United States disclose to defendant RICKY BOYD those portions of 

the Grand Jury Testimony of Joseph Leon Alexander that were set forth by the Court at the 

November 21, 2011 hearing.

_/s/ Katharine S. Hayden

KATHARINE S. HAYDEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:10-cr-00835-KSH Document 33 Filed 11/23/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 270
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31,                2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                       |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the period ending August 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of  Transdel Pharmaceuticals,                Inc. |

| Dated:                September 12, 2007 |
|------------------------------------------|

**TRANSDEL      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.**

| By: | */s/                Rolf Harms*Chief                Executive Officer andChief                Financial Officer |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 0 2

- 00 336

- CV

Kenneth Hartman

, Appellant

v.

Oakwood Acceptance Corporation , Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, 335TH

JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 11,565 , HONORABLE H.R. TOWSLEE , JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Kenneth Hartman has notified this Court that he no longer wishes to pursue his

appeal and has moved to dismiss the appeal. We grant his motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P . 42.1(a)(2).

Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Dismissed on Appellant

=

s Motion

Filed: August 30, 2002

Do Not Publish
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metals USA Holdings Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the
Periodic Report), I, Robert C. McPherson, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. To my knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |  |  |  |                                                                           
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Dated: July 16, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    ROBERT C. MCPHERSON,
III                                           
|                     |  |  |  | Robert C. McPherson, III Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Michael G. Dowd, on Behalf of Mayer Sadian, Petitioner, v Michael Sposato, Respondent.

[852 NYS2d 849]

The determination of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” *(People ex rel. Klein v Krueger,*25 NY2d 497, 499 [1969]; *see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson,*48 NY2d 230 [1979]). Lifson, J.P., Florio, Angiolillo and Chambers, JJ., concur.
[Doc. No. 18]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CAMDEN VICINAGE

SHELLY MARTIN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ATLANTICARE, et al.,

 Defendants.

Civil No. 10-6793 (JHR/JS) 

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ “Motion to

Disqualify Plaintiffs’ Counsel” [Doc. No. 18]; and the Court having

received plaintiffs’ opposition [Doc. No. 20] and the parties’

subsequent submissions [Doc. Nos. 23, 25, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43]; and

the Court having held two oral argument sessions; and the Court

finding good cause to grant defendants’ motion; and for all the

reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this 25 day of October, 2011, that th

defendants’ Motion to Disqualify Plaintiffs’ Counsel is GRANTED;

and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs’ law firm, Costello &

Mains, P.C., is immediately disqualified from representing

plaintiffs; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by no later than December 15, 2011,

new counsel shall enter their appearance for plaintiffs; and

Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 47 Filed 10/25/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1018
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a status conference is scheduled on

December 20, 2011 at 3:00 p.m. At least seven (7) days prior to

the conference, defense counsel and plaintiffs’ new counsel shall

serve a joint letter with their proposed case management schedule

with a list of issues to be discussed at the status conference.

s/Joel Schneider 

JOEL SCHNEIDER

United States Magistrate Judge

2

Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 47 Filed 10/25/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1019
Exhibit 32.2 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





In
connection with the Annual Report of Calgon Carbon Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Leroy
M. Ball, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial conditions and result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented therein.





/s/ Leroy M. BallLeroy
      M. BallChief
      Financial OfficerMarch
      13, 2009





(A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Calgon Carbon Corporation and will be
retained by Calgon Carbon Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.)





This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1006 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to empower the States to set the 

maximum annual percentage rates applicable to consumer credit transactions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 3, 2019 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself, Mr. REED, Mr. MERKLEY, and Ms. WARREN) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to empower the States 

to set the maximum annual percentage rates applicable 

to consumer credit transactions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Empowering States’ 

5 Rights To Protect Consumers Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITS ON ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATES. 

7 Chapter 2 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

8 1631 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1006 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 140B. LIMITS ON ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATES. 

2 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the an3 nual percentage rate applicable to any consumer credit 

4 transaction (other than a residential mortgage trans5 action), including any fees associated with such a trans6 action, may not exceed the maximum rate permitted by 

7 the laws of the State in which the consumer resides.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS