alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### United States *v.*Douglass.

*(District Court, E. D. South Carolina.*

January, 1888.)

Post-Office—Postmasters—Use of Stamps by.

On the trial of an indictment against a postmaster for the illegal use of postage stamps, *held,*under 1 Supp. Rev. St. U. S. *c.*259, p. 859, relating to the postal service, that it is unlawful for a postmaster to make any disposition of stamps intrusted to him, except the sale of them at their face value for cash to third persons.

Two Indictments against defendant, Edgar I. Douglass, postmaster, for illegal use of postage stamps.

*L. F. Youmans,*Dist. A tty., for the Government.

*E. W. Morse,*for defendant.

Simonton, J.,

*(charging ¡jury.)*You aro trying two distinct cases against the defendant, who was postmaster at Stalesburg, in this state. One of these—the .indictment-—charges him with using in the purchase of merchandise, and in the payment of debts, postage stamps which had been intrusted to him as postmaster. The other—the information—charges him with including in four quarterly returns to the post-office department the stamps so used by him, reporting them as canceled stamps, with the fraudulent intent of increasing his compensation as postmaster. The cases are brought under chapter 259, Act Gong, seventeenth June 1878, (1 Supp. liev. St. U. S. 359.) The defendant, testifying on his own behalf, admitted that he had used stamps on several occasions in paying for merchandise, and remitting money, for the purpose of making change. He says that he did this not dreaming that it was wrong, and that in every instance he had put the money value of the stamps so used in the till of the post-oilice, in fact thus purchasing the stamps irom himself. The act of congress forbids any disposition by a postmaster of stamps intrusted to him except the sale of them at their face value for cash to third persons. He cannot uso them in the purchase of goods or in payment of debts; nor can he purchase them from himself for any such purpose. By his own admission, therefore, he has violated the law, and if you believe him you must find him guilty on the indictment.
Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 1 of 24 PageID: 784

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 2 of 24 PageID: 785

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 3 of 24 PageID: 786

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 4 of 24 PageID: 787

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 5 of 24 PageID: 788

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 6 of 24 PageID: 789

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 7 of 24 PageID: 790

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 8 of 24 PageID: 791

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 9 of 24 PageID: 792

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 10 of 24 PageID: 793

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 11 of 24 PageID: 794

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 12 of 24 PageID: 795

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 13 of 24 PageID: 796

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 14 of 24 PageID: 797

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 15 of 24 PageID: 798

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 16 of 24 PageID: 799

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 17 of 24 PageID: 800

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 18 of 24 PageID: 801

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 19 of 24 PageID: 802

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 20 of 24 PageID: 803

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 21 of 24 PageID: 804

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 22 of 24 PageID: 805

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 23 of 24 PageID: 806

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 74-1   Filed 04/02/12   Page 24 of 24 PageID: 807
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BLANCA ROSA VILLATORO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-74780

Agency No. A092-631-298

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 5, 2010** 

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Blanca Rosa Villatoro, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to

reopen exclusion proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. 

FILED

APR 14 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-74780

We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de

novo questions of law. Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003). We

deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Villatoro’s motion to reopen

because the motion was filed more than eleven years after the BIA’s January 3,

1996, order dismissing the underlying appeal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and

Villatoro failed to demonstrate either that a regulatory exception to the filing

deadline applied, see id. § 1003.2(c)(3), or that she acted with the due diligence

required for equitable tolling, see Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at 897 (equitable tolling

available where “petitioner is prevented from filing because of deception, fraud, or

error, as long as the petitioner acts with due diligence”).

We lack jurisdiction to review Villatoro’s contention under Matter of N-B-,

22 I. & N. Dec. 590 (BIA 1999), because she failed to raise it before the BIA. See

Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004).

Villatoro’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
BLS Technical Advisory Committee May 19, 2023

 

10:00 am Acting Commissioner’s Welcome and Review of Agency Developments

10:30 am Imputation Methods for Asset and Liabilities Data in the Consumer Expenditure 

Interview Survey

Presenters: Geoffrey Paulin, Office of Prices and Living Conditions

Discussants: Rebecca Andridge, The Ohio State University

Kevin Moore, Federal Reserve Board of Governors

12:00 pm Data Collection During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic

Presenter: Jay Mousa, Office of Field Operations

12:45 pm Lunch

1:45 pm Progress on Standardizing the Task Data in ORS

Presenters: Nicole Nestoriak, Office of Compensation and Working Conditions

David Oh, Office of Compensation and Working Conditions

Discussants: Enghin Atalay, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

Julia Silge, Posit PBC

3:15 pm New JOLTS Measures Using Existing Data

Presenter: Dori Allard, Office of Employment and Unemployment Statistics

Discussant: John Haltiwanger, University of Maryland

4:00 pm Conclusion

All times Eastern Standard Time. Please contact BLSTAC@bls.gov for questions.

Virtual Registration at https://blstac.eventbrite.com
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D2023-3243

LT Case No. 2021-DP-17

____________________________

S.P., FATHER OF A.P., A CHILD,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND 

FAMILIES,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County.

Angela M. Cox, Judge. 

Jennifer Cogdill, Fleming Island, for Appellant. 

Sarah J. Rumph, of Children’s Legal Services, Tallahassee, for 

Appellee.

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and 

Sarah Todd Weitz, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, for 

Statewide Guardian ad Litem. 

June 10, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EISNAUGLE, SOUD, and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CastlePoint Holdings, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, Michael H. Lee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Joel S. Weiner,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
and 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Michael H. Lee
--------------------------
Michael H. Lee
Chief Executive Officer

May 14, 2007




/s/ Joel S. Weiner
--------------------------
Joel S. Weiner
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

May 14, 2007



                                       30
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SPECTRUM
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,007
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,007
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              143
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                8
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,030
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (70)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,804)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (484)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,320)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,804)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.56)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,208
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (523)
<INVENTORY>                                      9,461
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,331
<PP&E>                                         136,537
<DEPRECIATION>                                (86,132)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,247
<BONDS>                                        263,429
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                    (62,049)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,637
<SALES>                                        244,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               244,964
<CGS>                                          126,429
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,872
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,568
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (20,968)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,506
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,110)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,808)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,588
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial  statements of American  Resources & Development  Company for the year
ended March 31, 1999,  as set forth in its annual report on Form 10-KSB for such
year,  and  is  qualified  in  its  entirety  by  reference  to  such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            41,967
<SECURITIES>                                     157,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                    565,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                      48,787
<INVENTORY>                                      293,768
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,025,295
<PP&E>                                         1,485,285
<DEPRECIATION>                                   355,492
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,295,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,048,597
<BONDS>                                        3,552,120
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                          245
<COMMON>                                           3,174
<OTHER-SE>                                    (2,318,602)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,295,534
<SALES>                                        3,996,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,996,739
<CGS>                                          3,129,642
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,129,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,514,290
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               561,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (3,208,528)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (3,208,528)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (252,972)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (3,461,500)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (1.11)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementsNo. 33-16059, No. 33-12755, No. 33-55614, No. 33-80504, No. 333-00327 and No. 333-44180 of Sharper Image Corporation on Form S-8 of our reports dated May 31, 2007, relating to the financial statements andfinancial statement schedule of Sharper Image Corporation (which report includes an explanatory paragraph related to the adoption of a new accounting standard) and to management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting (which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting because of material weaknesses) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sharper Image Corporation forthe year ended January 31, 2007. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

San Francisco, California 

May 31, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1173 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1173

  To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 
                 Medical Services for Children program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 11, 2019

  Mr. Casey (for himself and Mr. Alexander) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 
                 Medical Services for Children program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Emergency Medical Services for 
Children Program Reauthorization Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 1910(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300w-
9(d)) is amended by inserting before the period the following: ``, and 
$22,334,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Shermen WSC Acquisition Corp.(the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                              | /s/ Francis P.  Jenkins, Jr. |
|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                              | Name:                             | Francis P.  Jenkins, Jr. |
|                              | Title:                            | Chairman, Chief  Executive Officer and |
|                              |                              | Director (Principal  Executive Officer) |
|                              |                              |
| Dated:   April 28, 2009 |                              |

 

----
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-16-00410-CV

____________________

ASHLEY NICOLE STRITTMATTER, Appellant

V.

MARIA DE LA CRUZ, Appellee

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 16-29649

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

On December 14, 2016, the Clerk of the Court sent a notice requiring the 

appellant’s response and warning that the appeal would be dismissed without 

further notice on any date after December 29, 2016. No response has been filed. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).
2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 ________________________________

 CHARLES KREGER 

 Justice

 

Submitted on January 18, 2017

Opinion Delivered January 19, 2017

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2


Long-Term Debt
--------------

         The Registrant agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange
Commission, upon request, a copy of any instrument defining the rights of
holders of long-term debt of the Registrant and all of its consolidated
subsidiaries and unconsolidated subsidiaries for which financial statements are
required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
#### Junk’n Doughnuts Inc., Doing Business as Schmuck Bros. of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v Department of Consumer Affairs of the City of New York, Appellant.

[855 NYS2d 59]

Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment setting aside as unconstitutional the New York City statute governing the licensing of dealers in secondhand articles (Administrative Code of City of NY, tit 20, ch 2, subch 11). After plaintiff received a notice of violation (NOV) from defendant alleging that it was operating as an unlicensed secondhand dealer in violation of Administrative Code § 20-265 and failed to appear for a scheduled hearing on the NOy defendant issued a default order finding plaintiff guilty of the violation. Plaintiff moved unsuccessfully to vacate the default. It then commenced a CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge defendant’s determination to deny its motion. In the petition, plaintiff stated that it was not submitting the *465constitutionality of the statute to the court but arguing that the constitutional infirmity of a statute constituted a meritorious defense in the administrative proceeding. Because the constitutional challenges plaintiff raises in the instant action arose out of the same transaction from which his article 78 claims arose, and plaintiff could have raised them in the article 78 proceeding, the constitutional challenges are barred by the doctrine of res judicata *(see O’Brien v City of Syracuse,*54 NY2d 353, 357 [1981]).

In any event, the statute does not impose unconstitutional restrictions on plaintiffs First Amendment rights but merely requires a license for dealing in secondhand articles *(see Matter of Irreplaceable Artifacts v City of N.Y. Dept. of Consumer Affairs,*22 AD3d 410, 411-412 [2005]). Nor does it impose an excessive burden on interstate commerce *(see Pike v Bruce Church, Inc.,*397 US 137, 142 [1970]) or disadvantage a suspect class or interfere with a fundamental right *(see San Antonio Independent School Dist. v Rodriguez,*411 US 1, 17 [1973]). Plaintiff was not prevented from practicing its chosen profession by the licensing scheme *(see New York State Trawlers Assn. v Jorling,*16 F3d 1303, 1311 [2d Cir 1994]). The inspection of its property did not violate its Fourth Amendment rights *(see Matter of Glenwood TV v Ratner,*103 AD2d 322 [1984], *affd*65 NY2d 642 [1985]; *see also Donovan v Dewey,*452 US 594, 598-599 [1981]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them without merit. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Gonzalez, McGuire and Moskowitz, JJ.