cr FILED 1N
The Court of Appeais
Sixth District
TUL 24 201%

Texarkana, Texas |

Jun 2 9 205

cher K (Debra Autre
: & ‘ zy SUG | :
elven KK, babes rey, C: mK IGT rij

ae eceimedk sue Me bree QE" Appellate case numlbec! —

be -1¢ 9007) CR, D6 15 -00043-CR_/ Thal Cour F

Tease ume OPW S12, CFA SIE 00 Tels 1S

urn Wolken daked Suly8,2015° took Telays to ced _
ned Tin Suce walt bake aia longer bo Lave we

daold selape rp ts Has. ra. nehare L puck — 1

Uxak cant control that and 1 apologize. Ta
Kewd iva Mais lekker ro ou. ts i ed and will

Te Aan SAAR tn bot: Hlso Twill Call-home today,

“amd make trawaes Yo iy tau exactly whak 2)
ee een bo you bo pe \ tN etbed ids Seat

6s. tm kellung yot. Ta. also send i pou-a-COpy..
, é Sam Py

FT an in compliance with (2\C8) ing sh

_____ FE agkedd Queission 12 ap peut Ag gtamtest als —

a be Sated ok ound Wer Sent ke you TE pray ——

request \yecasnee Wns. Sent ar * We ocmsiwlicl

|

Kv acs yor loose ocak nyo \ owgh any |

nor tolvek bs whic “oun allouseed ne ludtina —
t get ‘ ox ceunged . |

!
’
|

“Bn yan bor ypet Phot
oye Wee A :

a ner . a



242

Wizmer enclave oh COSeS

usy iver G20 F3d 347 (zoi1) 2 Plea gyre neat, are

Kontractual im nature and ane bo be consteusol

laccorXinaly. Alsa, US v Roberts 624 Fd 21.

Re SUL y Obake 23 Sw 4d OI (Tr app. Ct. Houston, 2000)",

Aléa RE: Swarthout 482 Sus 2d a2. ‘A plea F quilky i

a)
wy 69loa Iargainecd case_is pot an absol ute Waiver o

Ne. slgust 1.2 dineck appea\ reqacdless ot re

eclacations ac lack ducal inthe potice ok eppeal,

ond req ecdlese sk Le beret camrks glepia' \_ pecmissicia

bo appeal n

a

Pale 40l$)(4\-mugh obbain bria! coucts permission ke appeal vs

a

Mirror - Tinage Rule i doctrine that accephanest. ot on

pottackyual otter musk b2 gsi, wnesoaif’ io L,

bAneg wwwocas and wnambiquons .

Ss

Nebo whose glua conta a waiver of appeal Wt always!

lano\d wa\tave wn dhe liarkeok a;councks waler was fainted

Lay TAC, US vy White 397'73d 4363 Bsa, Coun vState

04, sw 2d V2.

Navarro v Store I47 SW ZA 1081. used cam appea\

NAILS COS2. Qt Svea La (ne entered scplsa quilby « 4

q
|e gles process. ia akin te contanot noachi ‘ktors - Ex gacte

oJiAlcuans G37. SW 2d 443 (lagz)> Moore v Skate 245 Sw 3d

424(z004); & eacte To Tavar Gal Sw ad 424(1495") 5 Sete

v Wilson 3244 SW 4d $415 (2212\ . |



‘ .
‘Ouc Hower Tan. request ne.

Cauce Ne. CF -l4-I377 ann (ouse Me. sz Wise,

oe ef
_Becond Yow dus oe) counse Mack E slrould Kul ne Inthe wan
_ sous. cS. ox ne we: x wort Ny. a. March | \7,20) ox Sate suet

\
: Muse onoe, “SY. Lensye, CMIOS, X

|

Pode Niwmber 1007} 145t050 « and Amy wewee. of + gone WOKS...

ras ntred Soy TreS Pec ¥ ive Assiskownce i Counsel, On we seaee ake.

}
becaswons tyr Sav mmons cucgested Mak = © should commattt _
{

_ buicide. The: sel oefore. T uress seanternced. in sour cock {ne Seame.. |
i

DN

vicoM aud Guvcsng our conve (ciel Sug sted Soe Bue

mess and wirSvushedt te ETIWC. Ak G8! Aw 3-19
IX uous dige \wargedt and toon dwwectly $3 (RUS Court roam, LT was
skill Waadivng, Bocongs my bandages when Twas bebere sous,

\ Aig salvad Savely oan. —
of maitnd because of wy § Suicide abkempt

ala. hy
WAS, sande: War influence. Ok Rares akies 4) S8Vece as mS

otk Klowe pin ond also several hund ed. wg $ ck Newtonb ns.
No enter cnto_a contract waa criminal L sebFing Shaul nethave
eon allowed My Jwyy ane Sat maces of. 2: (7-204,

Su Maes alleqations = aun requesting on a, opted

—TMaawkk WOO Gok S68