alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">TAM Medical Supply Corp., as Assignee of Senat, Benita, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Omni Indemnity Company, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant.Freiberg, Peck &amp; Kang, LLP (Yilo J. Kang, Esq.), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Sally E. Unger, J.), entered July 9, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, upon reargument and renewal, adhered to a prior order of the same court entered March 7, 2014 granting defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, by order entered March 7, 2014, the Civil Court granted a motion by defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that defendant had not issued an insurance policy covering the subject loss and, thus, that plaintiff had sued the wrong party. Plaintiff subsequently moved for leave to reargue and renew. Plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court entered July 9, 2014 as, upon reargument and renewal, adhered to the March 7, 2014 order.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <a href="../2015/2015_51294.htm" target="_blank"><i>TAM Med. Supply Corp. v Omni Indem. Co.</i> (48 Misc 3d 142</a>[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51294[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2015]), the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: September 22, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
**EXHIBIT
      23.2**




Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
      Patient Safety Technologies, Inc., f/k/a Franklin Capital Corporation, on Form
      S-8 of our report dated April 10, 2006, with respect to the consolidated
      financial statements of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. as of December 31,
      2005 and for the year then ended.








/s/
      Rothstein, Kass & Company, P.C.





Roseland,
      New Jersey


April
      15,
      2008
Exhibit 31.02
                                                                  -------------


                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Debi B. Halbert, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of ProFutures Diversified Fund,
L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting.



Date:  April 2, 2007



/s/ Debi B. Halbert

-----------------------------------------

Debi B. Halbert, Chief Financial Officer
ProFutures, Inc., General Partner
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1



                     SUBSIDIARIES OF ABINGTON BANCORP, INC.



     Abington Bancorp, Inc. has two subsidiaries. Abington Savings Bank (the
"Bank"), is a wholly owned subsidiary which is a Massachusetts-chartered savings
bank. Abington Bancorp Capital Trust is a Delaware business trust whose sole
purpose is to issue capital securities. The Bank has three wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Holt Park Place Development Corporation and Norroway Pond
Development Corporation which are both Massachusetts Corporations, and Abington
Securities Corporation, which is a Delaware Corporation. ABBK Corporation, which
was a wholly owned subsidiary of Abington Savings Bank incorporated in
Massachusetts, was dissolved in January of 1997.


                                       36
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, the undersigned officer of Owens-Illinois Group, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certifies that to such officer’s knowledge:

 

(i)            the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  February 29, 2008 | /s/  Albert P.L. Stroucken            |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                           | Albert P.L. Stroucken                 |
|                           | Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer |
|                           | Owens-Illinois  Group, Inc.      |

 

----

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 847 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 847

    Expressing support for the designation of February 12, 2020, as 
    ``Darwin Day'' and recognizing the importance of science to the 
                        betterment of humanity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2020

Mr. Himes submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing support for the designation of February 12, 2020, as 
    ``Darwin Day'' and recognizing the importance of science to the 
                        betterment of humanity.

Whereas Charles Darwin developed the theory of evolution by natural selection, 
        which provides humanity with a logical and intellectually compelling 
        explanation for the diversity of life on Earth;
Whereas the validity of the theory of evolution by natural selection is strongly 
        supported by the monumental amount of scientific evidence Charles Darwin 
        compiled to support the theory and the modern understanding of the 
        science of genetics;
Whereas the human curiosity and ingenuity exemplified by Charles Darwin have 
        promoted new scientific discoveries that have helped humanity solve many 
        problems and improve living conditions;
Whereas the advancement of science must be protected from individuals 
        unconcerned with the adverse impacts of global warming and climate 
        change;
Whereas the teaching of creationism in some public schools compromises the 
        scientific and academic integrity of the education systems of the United 
        States;
Whereas Charles Darwin is a worthy symbol of scientific advancement on whom to 
        focus and around whom to build a global celebration of science and 
        humanity intended to promote a common bond among all the people of the 
        Earth; and
Whereas February 12, 2020, is the anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin in 
        1809 and is an appropriate date to designate as ``Darwin Day'': Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses support for the designation of ``Darwin 
        Day'';
            (2) recognizes the importance of science to the betterment 
        of humanity; and
            (3) recognizes Charles Darwin as a worthy symbol for 
        celebrating science, the achievements of reason, and the 
        advancement of human knowledge.
                                 <all>
```
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Matthew Ryan Wilson, Appellant

No. 06

- 12

- 00096

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 6th District Court of Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 24585 ). Opinion delivered by Just ice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We n ote that the appellant, Matthew Ryan Wilson, has adequately indicated his inability
to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 19 , 2012 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
period ended March 31, 2009 (the Report), filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
  /s/ Robert G. Costantini

Robert G. CostantiniExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit No. 32.1
 Marketing Acquisition Corporation
 File No. 0-52072 Form 10-Q
 Quarter ended September 30, 2010
  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 as adopted Pursuant to Section 906
 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 -
 Chief Executive and Financial Officer
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing Acquisition Corporation (Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Timothy P. Halter, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  
 Dated: November 3, 2010

By:   /s/ Timothy P. HalterTimothy P. HalterChief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer
 
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Marketing Acquisition Corporation and will be retained by Marketing Acquisition Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION  I, Matthew H. Sage, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Success Exploration & Resources, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.   Dated: January 21, 2014 By:  /s/ Matthew H. Sage  Matthew H. Sage, President, Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)   1
@misc{1208001,
  author = {Craig I. Schlenoff and Lei Yang and Yifei Hu and Lihai Zhang and Peng Zhang},
  title = {Three New IEEE Robotics and Automation Society Standards Working Groups on Surgical Robotics and Electric Vehicle Charging Robots},
  year = {2023},
  number = {30},
  month = {2023-03-28 04:03:00},
  publisher = {Magazine},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936010},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2023.3237468},
  language = {en},
}
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tianyin Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, James Jiayuan Tong, Chief Financial Officer & Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.








Date: August 22, 2011








/s/    James Jiayuan TongJames Jiayuan TongChief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer,Chief Business and Development Officer, Director
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

GAVIN JOSEPH CERCO,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 943 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
#### David John Carnivale, Appellant, v State of New York et al., Respondents.

[822 NYS2d 267]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), entered August 26, 2005, which, in a declaratory judgment action by a New York architect challenging the constitutionality of the continuing education requirements for architects (Education Law § 7308; 8 NYCRR 69.6), granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff claims that the challenged continuing education requirements violate various provisions of the state and federal constitutions in that they force him to take classes sponsored by the American Institute of Architects (AIA), a trade group that he opposes. In fact, the State Department of Education has approved three other sponsors of continuing education for architects—the Department of State, Division of Code Enforcement, the City College of the City University of New York and the Society of American Registered Architects, all of which offer courses in the New York City area. Plaintiff also has the option of taking courses given by a postsecondary educational institution with authority to offer programs that are registered pursuant to 8 NYCRR part 52 (8 NYCRR 69.6 [i] [2] [ii]). Defendants demonstrate that these provide a reasonable alternative to AIA-sponsored courses, fatally undermining plaintiffs constitutional claims. In any event, plaintiff states no cognizable constitutional *385claims. His equal protection claim fails because to the extent there exists any difference between AIA members and nonmembers in their ability to satisfy the continuing education requirements, there is a rational basis for the difference. AIA is the largest professional organization of architects in the state, and it is therefore rational that the Legislature, and the Department of Education by regulation, would authorize it to sponsor an extensive schedule of continuing education courses. We have considered and rejected plaintiffs other arguments. Concur— Tom, J.E, Saxe, Friedman, Sullivan and McGuire, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7944

GERALD PAYNE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GARY KEYSER; HEARING OFFICER SORRELLS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WILLIAMS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.

(CA-95-1206)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerald Payne, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Payne v. Keyser, No. CA-95-1206 (W.D. Va. Nov. 16, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
the Company for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the
Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Robert G. CostantiniRobert G. CostantiniExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)