United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Last revised November 20, 2008.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO 

ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

IN CIVIL CASES BEFORE JUDGE WILLIAM ALSUP

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this supplemental order is to guide the parties on recurring practical

questions that arise prior to trial and to impose certain requirements for the conduct of the

case. Counsel must please read this order and follow it. 

SERVICE OF THIS ORDER

1. For cases originating in this Court, plaintiff(s) must serve this order and the order

setting the initial case management conference (along with any other required pleadings) on each

defendant. For cases removed from state court, the removing defendant(s) must serve this order

and the order setting the initial case management conference (along with any other required

pleadings) immediately on each and every party that has previously appeared or that appears

within thirty days after removal. Thereafter, any existing party to the action that brings a new

party into the action must immediately serve a copy of this order and the order setting the initial

case management conference (along with any other required pleadings) on the new party. 

Case 3:10-cv-03230-FLW-LHG Document 15 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 59
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

2. The parties will please address the standardized items in the court-wide format

for the joint case management statement. This is available at the Standing Order For all Judges

of the Northern District of California — Contents of Joint Case Management Statements. 

Please file (electronically or manually depending on your case) at least SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS

prior to the case management conference. 

3. Each party shall be represented at the case management conference by counsel

prepared to address all such matters and with authority to enter stipulations and to make

admissions. 

4. Pursuant to FRCP 26(d), no formal discovery shall be initiated by any party until

after the meet-and-confer session required by FRCP 26(f), except by stipulation or prior court

order. As soon as a party has notice of this order, however, the party shall take such affirmative

steps as are necessary to preserve evidence related to the issues presented by the action,

including, without limitation, interdiction of any document-destruction programs and any

ongoing erasures of e-mails, voice mails, and other electronically-recorded material. 

ELECTRONIC CASE FILING — LODGING HARD COPIES WITH CHAMBERS

5. In all “E-Filing” cases, in addition to filing papers electronically, the parties are

required to lodge for chambers one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically. 

These printed copies shall be marked “Chambers Copy — Do Not File” and shall be in an

envelop clearly marked with the judge’s name and case number. It shall be delivered to the

Clerk’s office no later than noon on the day following the day that the papers were filed

electronically. Parties shall not file a paper copy of any document with the Clerk’s Office that

has already been filed electronically. For the final pretrial conference, please follow

Guidelines for Trial and Final Pretrial Conference In Civil Jury Cases Before the Honorable

William Alsup. 

SETTING MOTIONS FOR HEARING

6. Counsel need not request a motion hearing date and may notice non-discovery

motions for any Thursday (excepting holidays) at 8:00 a.m. The Court sometimes rules on the

Case 3:10-cv-03230-FLW-LHG Document 15 Filed 02/23/10 Page 2 of 10 PageID: 60
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

papers, issuing a written order and vacating the hearing. If a written request for oral argument is

filed before a ruling, stating that a lawyer of four or fewer years out of law school will conduct

the oral argument or at least the lion’s share, then the Court will hear oral argument, believing

that young lawyers need more opportunities for appearances than they usually receive. 

FORM OF SUBMISSIONS

7. On summary judgment motions, joint statements of undisputed facts are not

required but are helpful if completely agreed upon. Please do not file separate statements of

“undisputed facts.” 

8. Reply declarations are disfavored. Opening declarations should set forth all facts

on points foreseeably relevant to the relief sought. Reply papers should not raise new points that

could have been addressed in the opening.

9. The title of the submission must be sufficient to alert the Court to the relief

sought; for example, please do not bury a request for continuance in the body of a memorandum. 

10. All submissions filed with the Court shall include on the cover sheet the date and

time of the hearing or conference. Counsel should include their facsimile transmission numbers

along with their telephone numbers on their papers. 

DISCOVERY

11. The following paragraphs on discovery provide counsel and the parties with

views and guidelines of Judge Alsup so that they can plan accordingly. For good cause, the

parties are invited to propose any modifications in their joint case management conference

statement. Unless and until modified, however, the following provisions shall supplement the

requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules. 

12. In responding to requests for documents and materials under FRCP 34, all parties

shall affirmatively state in a written response the full extent to which they will produce materials

and shall, promptly after the production, confirm in writing that they have produced all such

materials so described that are locatable after a diligent search of all locations at which such

materials might plausibly exist. It is not sufficient to state that “responsive” materials will be or

Case 3:10-cv-03230-FLW-LHG Document 15 Filed 02/23/10 Page 3 of 10 PageID: 61
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

have been produced. Such a response leaves open the distinct possibility that other responsive

materials have not been produced. 

13. In searching for responsive materials in connection with FRCP 34 requests or for

materials required to be disclosed under FRCP 26(a)(1), parties must search computerized files,

e-mails, voice mails, work files, desk files, calendars and diaries, and any other locations and

sources if materials of the type to be produced might plausibly be expected to be found there. 

The Court has found that certain basic information normally learned by counsel anyway should

be made available to the other side at the time of production, as if it were a response to a

standing interrogatory, as follows. At the time of the production, the responding party should

provide a written list to the requesting party setting forth in detail each specific source and

location searched. The list must also identify, by name and position, all persons conducting the

search and their areas of search responsibility. The producing party shall also provide a list

describing the specific source for each produced item as well as for each item withheld on a

ground of privilege, using the unique identifying numbers to specify documents or ranges. 

Materials produced in discovery should bear unique identifying control numbers on each page. 

14. To the maximum extent feasible, all party files and records should be retained

and produced in their original form and sequence including file folders, and the originals should

remain available for inspection by any counsel on reasonable notice. 

15. Except for good cause, no item shall be received as case-in-chief evidence if the

proponent has failed to produce it in response to a reasonable and proper discovery request

covering the item, regardless of whether any discovery motion was made. A burden or

overbreadth or similar objection shall not be a valid reason for withholding requested materials

actually known to counsel or a party representative responsible for the conduct of the litigation. 

16. Privilege logs shall be promptly provided and must be sufficiently detailed and

informative to justify the privilege. See FRCP 26(b)(5). No generalized claims of privilege or

work-product protection shall be permitted. With respect to each communication for which a

Case 3:10-cv-03230-FLW-LHG Document 15 Filed 02/23/10 Page 4 of 10 PageID: 62
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

claim of privilege or work product is made, the asserting party must at the time of assertion

identify: 

(a) all persons making or receiving the privileged or protected

communication; 

(b) the steps taken to ensure the confidentiality of the communication,

including affirmation that no unauthorized persons have received the

communication; 

(c) the date of the communication; and 

(d) the subject matter of the communication. 

Failure to furnish this information at the time of the assertion will be deemed a waiver of the

privilege or protection. The log should also indicate, as stated above, the location where the

document was found. 

17. Absent extraordinary circumstances, counsel shall consult in advance with

opposing counsel and unrepresented proposed deponents to schedule depositions at

mutually-convenient times and places. That some counsel may be unavailable shall not,

however, be grounds for deferring or postponing a deposition if another attorney from the

same firm or who represents a party with similar interests to that witness is able to attend. 

Ordinarily, if one side desires a prompt deposition, the other side is expected to agree to dates

falling within thirty days of the request. On the other hand, rarely should one side expect the

other side to agree to a deposition sooner than seven days of the request. 

18. If any objection to a request for materials is overruled, and if the disputed request

was due and pending at the time of a deposition, the withholding party or counsel must, at the

request of any other party, re-produce all deponents under its control or represented by them for

further deposition examination as to any new materials produced in response that are germane

to that deponent and must bear the expense of doing so. A party objecting to producing

requested materials may not use the existence of its own objections as a basis for postponing

any deposition unless such party promptly meets and confers and then, if failing to reach an

agreement, seeks to bring a prompt motion for a protective order. 

Case 3:10-cv-03230-FLW-LHG Document 15 Filed 02/23/10 Page 5 of 10 PageID: 63
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6

19. Counsel and parties shall comply with FRCP 30(d)(1). Deposition objections

must be as to privilege or form only. Speaking objections are prohibited. Under no

circumstances should any counsel interject, “if you know,” or otherwise coach a deponent. 

When a privilege is claimed, the witness should nevertheless answer questions relevant to the

existence, extent or waiver of the privilege, such as the date of a communication, who made the

statement, to whom and in whose presence the statement was made, other persons to whom the

contents of the statement have been disclosed, and the general subject matter of the statement. 

Private conferences between deponents and attorneys in the course of examination, including a

line of related questions, are improper and prohibited except for the sole purpose of determining

whether a privilege should be asserted. 

20. Deponents and their counsel must make a good-faith effort to prepare for

depositions and to refresh witness memories on important matters in the suit about which the

witness reasonably should be expected to have knowledge. Deponents who claim to lack

recollection during their deposition but who later claim at trial to have had their memories

refreshed in the interim, may be, among other things, impeached with their previous failures of

recollection during their depositions or be subject to preclusion. In preparing deponents,

defending counsel shall segregate and retain all materials used to refresh their memories and

shall provide them to examining counsel at the outset of the deposition. 

21. To the maximum extent feasible, deposition exhibits shall be numbered in a

simple manner that will allow the same numbering at trial. In discovery, counsel shall agree on

blocks of exhibit numbers to be used by the respective parties. Identical exhibits should not be

re-marked, but various versions of the same document, such as copies with hand notes added,

should be separately marked if used. See Local Rule 30-2(b)(3). 

22. FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) requires disclosure of all opinions, bases, reasons and “other

information considered” by an expert. Counsel shall preserve all drafts of expert reports

(partial or complete) and notes and other evidence of communications with experts (or with

any intermediaries between counsel and the experts) on the subject of this actual or potential

testimony, and shall instruct their experts and any intermediaries to do likewise. All such

Case 3:10-cv-03230-FLW-LHG Document 15 Filed 02/23/10 Page 6 of 10 PageID: 64
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

7

materials shall be produced upon expert designation (unless all parties otherwise stipulate in

writing). This requirement does not apply to intermediate drafts prepared solely by the

testifying expert not provided to or discussed with anyone else. Counsel’s private notes of

conversations will be treated as work product and need not be produced absent the showing

required by FRCP 26(b)(3). 

23. With respect to depositions under FRCP 30(b)(6), the fundamental purpose is to

allow a party to notice a deposition by subject matter, thereby requiring the respondent to

designate and to produce one or more organization witnesses knowledgeable on the designated

topic, a useful procedure when the roles of percipient witnesses controlled by an adverse party

are unknown. In some cases, however, counsel routinely appear to notice

Rule 30(b)(6) depositions on numerous and wide-ranging topics, including even the basis for

“contentions” made by adverse parties. To obviate disputes and to give guidance, these

guidelines will be observed: 

(a) Without a prior order increasing the limit, a party may seek

Rule 30(b)(6) depositions from another party on up to a total of ten subject

matters (for the entire case) described with “reasonable particularity.” In framing

the subjects, it is normally improper to ask for Rule 30(b)(6) deponents to testify

concerning the entire basis of a claim or defense. On the other hand, examples of

proper subjects, which would require the respondent to find and to produce

knowledgeable deponents, include “the time line of research and development

leading to the invention in question” or “the efforts undertaken by defendant to

locate documents responsive to plaintiff’s document request.” The notice should

be directed at discovering percipient facts in the possession of the adverse party,

not at forcing a supposed “fact witness” to appear and defend the entire thesis of a

claim or defense. If a notice includes an overbroad topic, the overbroad topic

shall be unenforceable and may not be later replaced with a proper topic. 

(b) Each witness-designee deposed for one half-day or more in a

Rule 30(b)(6) deposition shall count as a single deposition for purposes of the

Case 3:10-cv-03230-FLW-LHG Document 15 Filed 02/23/10 Page 7 of 10 PageID: 65
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

8

deposition limit under FRCP 26 or under any case management order setting a

limit on the number of depositions. A corporate designee may, immediately after

being deposed on the stated subject, be deposed in his or her individual capacity. 

Both such sessions shall count together as a single deposition (although they

should be separately transcribed). If two designees, to take another example, are

interrogated, each for one half-day or more, then they count as two depositions. 

(c) If an organization cannot reasonably locate a witness to testify

based on personal knowledge, there is no requirement under Rule 30(b)(6) for the

organization to “woodshed” or to “educate” an individual to testify on the subject. 

If the organization does not produce any such deponent, however, the

organization may not present case-in-chief evidence at trial or on summary

judgment on that topic from any witness it could have so designated. 

(d) Rule 30(b)(6) testimony never constitutes an irrebuttable judicial

admission. It will normally, however, be evidence admissible against the

organization producing the witness. The jury may, upon request, be instructed on

the significance of the testimony under Rule 30(b)(6). 

24. If a dispute arises during a deposition and involves either a persistent obstruction

of the deposition or a refusal to answer a material question on a ground other than privilege,

counsel may attempt to arrange a telephone conference with the Court through the courtroom

deputy, Dawn Toland, at 415-522-2020. Any such conference should be attended by the same

court reporter recording the deposition. 

25. All other requests for discovery relief must first be summarized in a letter no

longer than three pages from the party seeking relief after having met and conferred. Up to

twelve pages of attachments may be added. In the letter, counsel should identify themselves in

the signature block as “counsel for ___________.” The letter should be electronically-filed in

the official file along with the discovery-dispute requests and responses, as well as any timely

letter cancelling the hearing if settlement is reached. (Please note that with all communications

with the Court by e-filing, a hard copy must be lodged in the Court’s mail box in the Clerk’s

Case 3:10-cv-03230-FLW-LHG Document 15 Filed 02/23/10 Page 8 of 10 PageID: 66
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

9

Office on the sixteenth floor no later than noon of the following day.) The Court will then

advise the parties whether a response, written motion or a telephone conference or court hearing

will be required. After the telephone conference or hearing, counsel should submit their

proposed order (agreed as to form) by e-filing it. This paragraph applies only to cases wherein

discovery is being supervised by the district judge rather than by a magistrate judge or special

master. 

DISCLOSURES

26. Apart from discovery, Rule 26 requires certain automatic disclosures and requires

them to be made in a timely manner. Under Rule 37(c), untimely-disclosed materials may not be

used at trial or on summary judgment unless the delay in disclosure is “harmless” or unless

“substantial justification” for the delay is shown. 

COMMUNICATIONS WITH CHAMBERS

27. Please do not send any letters to the Court (except for requests for discovery

conferences, short cover letters for dismissals, orders agreed-upon as to form, or chambers

copies of electronically-filed documents). When corresponding with the Court by letter, always

identify whom you represent. Please do not fax or messenger anything to chambers without

advance permission specific to the item. Please e-file all submissions to the Court and make sure

a hard copy is lodged in the Court’s mail box in the Clerk’s Office on the sixteenth floor no later

than noon of the following day. 

28. You may contact the courtroom deputy, Dawn Toland (on the sixteenth floor in

the Clerk’s Office), at 415-522-2020 with appropriate inquiries. Except for the letters described

above, please do not attempt to make contact by telephone or any other ex parte means with

chambers staff. 

CROSS REFERENCE TO OTHER STANDING ORDERS AND GUIDELINES

29. The Court has separate standing guidelines for preparation for the final pretrial

conference and trial. In securities cases, the Court has a standing order concerning early notice

Case 3:10-cv-03230-FLW-LHG Document 15 Filed 02/23/10 Page 9 of 10 PageID: 67
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

10

to class members. They are always available for review at the website for the United States

District Court for the Northern District of California at www.cand.uscourts.gov. 

Dated: November 20, 2008. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-03230-FLW-LHG Document 15 Filed 02/23/10 Page 10 of 10 PageID: 68