alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
iii

Preface

This is the third in a series of reports presenting articles pertaining to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics(BLS) Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE). The most

recent report, Consumer Expenditure Survey Anthology,

2005, was published in April 2005. As in the previous anthologies, articles discussing ongoing research and methodological issues pertaining to the CE and analytical articles

using this survey’s data are included in this report. For the

first time, articles discussing processing methods and improvements are also included here.

This report was prepared in the Office of Prices and Living Conditions, Division of Consumer Expenditure Surveys

(DCES), under the general direction of Steve Henderson,

Chief of the Branch of Information and Analysis, and was

produced and edited by John M. Rogers, Section Chief. Articles on research and methodology were contributed by

Lucilla Tan and Nhien To of the Branch of Research and

Program Development; Sylvia Johnson-Herring, Susan King,

and Sharon Krieger of the Division of Price Statistical

Methods; and Nathan McDermott formerly of the Branch of

Production and Control. Articles on processing improvements were contributed by Steven Bass, Brendan

Livingston, and Nathan McDermott, all formerly of the

Branch of Production and Control. Analytical articles

were contributed by Brett Creech, Meaghan Duetsch,

Geoffrey Paulin, and Mark Vendemia of the Branch of

Information and Analysis.

This report was edited by Brian Baker, Edith Baker, and

Monica Gabor of the Office of Publications and Special

Studies; and Margaret Jones, of the same office provided

layout services.

BLS makes CE data available in news releases, reports, and

articles in the Monthly Labor Review, as well as on CD-ROMs

and on the Internet. A biennial report includes standard tables

of recent survey data, a discussion of expenditure changes,

and a description of the survey and its methods. Current and

historical CE tables classified by standard demographic variables are available at the BLS Internet site http://www.bls.gov/

cex. This site also provides other survey information, including answers to frequently asked questions, a glossary of terms,

order forms for survey products, articles from the Monthly

Labor Review, and other research articles.

The material that follows is divided into three sections: Section 1 includes articles on survey research and methodology,

section 2 includes articles on processing issues and improvements, and section 3 presents analysis of topics of interest

based on CE data. An appendix includes a general description

of the survey and its methods and a glossary of terms.

Sensory-impaired individuals may obtain information on

this publication upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200,

Federal Relay Service: 1 (800) 877-8339. The material presented is in the public domain and, with appropriate credit,

may be reproduced without permission. For further information, call (202) 691-6900.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Charles C. Ward, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Constellation Energy Partners LLC, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:

(i) The
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Constellation Energy Partners LLC.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Charles C. Ward                  
|Charles C. Ward                      
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                                     
|August 10, 2009                      



56
# table129_q14.4_size
August 13, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

RENDRICK ANTHONY CHEEKS, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00676-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in judgment. 

The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED, appellant pay all costs incurred by 

reason of this appeal, and that this decision be certified below for observance.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in post-effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-7053 on Form S-8,in Registration Statement Nos. 33-44700, 333-44024 and 333-46218 on From S-8 of our report dated December 23, 2004 (January 6, 2006 as to the effect of the restatement discussed in Note 18) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion andincludes an explanatory paragraph relating to the restatement described in Note 18) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Archon Corporation for the year ended September 30, 2005. 

 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Las Vegas, Nevada 

January 6, 2006
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OS E P H E . R UB I NO , P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. A C M E B U IL D IN G M A IN T E N A N C E ; et a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 16223 D . C . N o . 5 : 0 8 -cv -0 0 6 9 6 -JW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J a m e s W ar e , C hi e f

Judge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2011 ** B e f o r e : G O O D W I N , W A L L A C E , an dM c K E O W N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . J os e ph E . R ubi no appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s s um m aryj udgm e nt in h is e m p lo y m e n t a c tio n a lle g in g r a c e d is c r im in a tio n in v io la tio n o f T itle V I I . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o , L eongv. P ot ter , 

# FI LED JAN 06 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 16223 2 3 4 7 F. 3 d1 1 1 7 , 1 1 2 3 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 3 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y grant ed sum m ary j ud gm enton R ub i no ’ s r ac e di sc ri m i nat i on cl ai m because Rub i no fa i l ed t o rai se a genui ne di sput e of m at er i al fa ctas t o w hether A C M E B ui l di ng M ai nt enance tre at ed si m i l ar l y s i tuat ed in d iv idu a ls o u ts id e h is p r o te c te dc la s s m o r e f a v o r ab ly . Se e i d. a t1124. T he di stri ctcourtdi d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng R ub i no ’ s di sc ov ery m o tio n s . Se e H

al le t t v . Mor gan , 29 6 F . 3d 73 2, 75 1 (9th C i r. 20 02 ) ( no t i ng that

“ [ b] r oa d di s c r e t i on i s ve s t e d i n the tr i a l c ourtt o pe rm i torde nydi s c ove ry ” ( c i t a t i on and i nt ernal qu ot at i on m arks om i tt ed)) . R ub i no ’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s, i ncl ud i ng tho se re gardi ng j ud i ci albi as , ar e un pers uasi ve. W e d o n o t c o n s id e rR ub in o ’s c o n te n tio n s r a is e df o rth e f ir s t tim e o n ap p e a l. See Sm i th v. M

a rsh , 19 4 F . 3d 10 45 , 10 52 (9th C i r. 19 99 ). AF F I RME D.
908 A.2d 177

#### IN THE MATTER OF PETER H. JACOBY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 003981987).

October 16, 2006.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-068, concluding that PETER H. JACOBY of BEDMINSTER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating *RPC*8.4(c) (commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer);

And the Court having granted respondent’s petition for review and having ordered PETER H. JACOBY to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And the Court having determined from its review of the record that the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct is a censure;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PETER H. JACOBY is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**Certification
      of Periodic Financial Report**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**








Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Criticare
      Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
      the Company for the year ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
      information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Date:
      September 12, 2005 **** /s/
      Emil H.
      Soika


Emil
      H.
      Soika, Chief Executive Officer











Date:
      September 12, 2005      /s/
      Joel D.
      Knudson


Joel
      D.
      Knudson, Vice President - Finance











This
      Certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
      to
      the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.
M A N D A T E

TO THE 193RD DISTRICT COURT of DALLAS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 22nd day of

January, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

JOHN H. CARNEY & ASSOCIATES, Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL ROSELLINI, D.D.S., Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-13-00368-CV (Tr.Ct.No. DC-12-00869)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 27th day of July, 2015.

Cecile Foy Gsanger, CLERK

FILE COPY
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Green Irons
Holdings Corp., Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Andrew Couvell, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer, of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.


Date: July 30, 2007

By: /s/ Andrew Couvell
        Andrew Couvell
        President, Chief Executive Officer,
        Chief Financial Officer, and Principal
        Accounting Officer
<PAGE>   1



                                 EXHIBIT 10.14
















































                                      27



<PAGE>   2
                                   AMENDMENT


     This is an Amendment, dated February 20, 1997, to an Employment Agreement
dated November 24, 1993 (the "Agreement"), by and between CRITICARE SYSTEMS,
INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), and RICHARD J. OSOWSKI ("Mr.
Osowski").

     1. The Agreement is hereby amended to add a new section 6(c) to read in
its entirety:

        (c) Termination Following a Change in Control.  "Change in      
Control" shall mean a sale or other transfer not in the ordinary course of
business of all or substantially all of the Corporation's assets or a
transaction, or series of related transactions, the effect of which is to cause
more than 50% of the Corporation's issued and outstanding voting capital stock
to be beneficially owned by one person or entity or a group of related or
affiliated persons or entities.  Notwithstanding any of the other provisions of
this section 6, after 3 months following a Change in Control, if Mr.
Osowski's employment terminates for any reason, whether such termination is
initiated by Mr. Osowski or the Corporation (and regardless of the existence or
lack of Cause), Mr. Osowski (or if Mr. Osowski dies, his heirs or
beneficiaries) will be entitled to receive and the Corporation will pay and
provide his then Base Salary and the fringe benefits described in sections
5(b), 5(c) and 5(e), at the levels then in effect, for a period of one year
after the date of such termination and the group insurance described in section
5(a) until he reaches age 65.

     2. The Agreement in all other respects is not amended but remains
unchanged and the parties thereto continue to be legally bound by the
Agreement, as amended hereby.

                                      CRITICARE SYSTEMS, INC.

                                      /s/ Gerhard J. Von der Ruhr
                                      ---------------------------------------   
                                        Gerhard J. Von der Ruhr, President


                                     /s/ Richard J. Osowski
                                     ----------------------------------------   
                                             Richard J. Osowski
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

ERIC GALES,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 34 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                           DIGITAL MICROWAVE CORPORATION

                                LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


                               DMC Telecom U.K. Ltd.
                              East Kilbride, Scotland

                              DMC Telecom Canada, Inc.
                             Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada

                                DMC do Brazil Ltda.
                                  Campinas, Brazil

                            DMC de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
                                Mexico City, Mexico

                      Digital Microwave India Private Limited
                                  New Delhi, India

                           DMC Telecom Philippines, Inc.
                             Metro Manila, Philippines

                                   Granger, Inc.
                                 San Antonio, Texas

                               MAS Technology Limited
                              Wellington, New Zealand

                         NZ Telecoms (Proprietary) Limited
                      South Pretoria, Republic of South Africa
## COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 181st District Court of Randall County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on March 31,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

James Charles Bedree v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-14-00009-CR Trial Court Number: 23,626-B

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated March 31, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended for which

let execution issue.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on July 17, 2015

.



# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
#### In the Matter of Amora Rachelle, Petitioner, v Kathleen M. Rice et al., Respondents.

[976 NYS2d 888]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondents from proceeding with a criminal action entitled *People v Rachelle,*pending in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, under indictment No. 1387N/12.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

“[A] petitioner seeking a writ of prohibition must demonstrate that: (1) a body or officer is acting in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity, (2) that body or officer is proceeding or threatening to proceed in excess of its jurisdiction and (3) petitioner has a clear legal right to the relief requested” *(Matter of Garner v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.,*10 NY3d 358, 361-362 [2008]; *see Matter of Holtzman v Goldman,*71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; *Matter of Sedore v Epstein,*56 AD3d 60, 63 [2008]).

Here, the petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought *(see*Education Law § 6514; *Matter of Willoughby v Murphy, 54*AD3d 419 [2008]). Dickerson, J.P, Hall, Cohen and Miller, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regal Life Concepts, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

   1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:  January 12, 2009


/s/ Eric Wildstein
-------------------------------------------
Eric Wildstein, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6691]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Watteau to Degas: French Drawings from the Frits Lugt Collection,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Frick Collection, New York, NY, from on or about October 6, 2009, until on or about January 10, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/453-8048). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

Dated: June 29, 2009.

C. Miller Crouch,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-16121 Filed 7-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11050 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROBERT ERVIN HARNER, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-CR-131-T

- - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Robert Ervin Harner appeals his guilty-plea conviction for bank robbery and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 2113(a). Harner argues that the district court clearly erred in increasing his offense level by seven points for the discharge of a firearm during the commission of the offense under § 2B3.1(b)(2)(A) of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, in denying a reduction for acceptance of responsibility under § 3E1.1, and inNo. 96-11050 - 2 - calculating his criminal history. Harner waived his right to appeal these aspects of his sentence in the plea agreement, and he has not shown that the waiver-of-appeal provision was not knowing and voluntary. See United States v. Melancon , 972 F.2d 566, 568 (5th Cir. 1992). Because Harner waived his right to appeal these issues, his appeal is DISMISSED.
APPEAL DISMISSED.