T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DA VI D T . L AS HG AR I a n dMAR J E H. L A S H G A R I, P l ai n t i ffs - A p p el l an t s, v. W IL L IA M J. B R A T T O N , L A P D , C hi ef ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees, a nd J O H N E R D E R T ; e t a l., D efen d an t s. N o. 09- 56289 D. C . No . 2 : 0 4 - c v - 0 3 3 2 2 - S J O- OP ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S . J a m e s O t e r o, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r14, 2010 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dT H O M A S , C i rcu i tJu d g es. 

# FI LED JAN 07 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 56289 2 D avi d T . L as hg ar i and M ar j e H . L as hg ar i appeal pro se f rom the di stri ct c ourt ’ s or de r s di s m i s s i ng the i r42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on f orf a i l ur e t o pr os e c ut e a nd d e n y i n g th e i rmo t i o n f

o rr e c o n s i d e r a t i o n . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w f

o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n . U

ni te d N at ’ l I ns . C o. v . Spe c tr um W orldw i de, Inc. , 5 5 5 F .3 d7 7 2 , 7 8 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) ( r e c o n s id e r a tio n ) ; P agtalunan v. G a la za , 2 9 1 F. 3 d6 3 9 , 6 4 0 - 4 1 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 2 ) ( f a i l u r e t o p r o s e c u t e ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on bydi s m i s s i ng the a c t i on f or fa i l ure t o p rose cut e a ft eri tw arned the L as hg ar i s thatno ncom pl i ance w i th i t s order t o f i l e a n a m e nde d c om pl a i ntc oul d r e s ul ti n di s m i s s a l a nd i tgr a nt e d a n e xt e ns i on of t i m e t o c om pl y , a nd the L a s hga r i s f a i l e d t o a m e nd the i rc om pl a i ntf or ap p r o x im a te lys ix m o n th s a f te rth e d e a d lin e f

o rd o in g s o . Se e P agtalunan , 291 F . 3d at64 2-43 (di sc ussi ng fa ct ors thatdi stri ctcourt s m ustconsi der before di sm i ss i ng un der F eder alR ul e of C i vi l P roce du re 41 (b)) T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on byde ny i ng the m ot i on f or r e c ons i de r a t i on be c aus e the L a s hga r i s f a i l e d t o pr ovi de as uf

f i c i e ntba s i s f

or r e c o n s id e r a tio n . See U

ni te d N at ’ l I ns . C o. , 555 F . 3d a t780 ( l i s t i ng ba s e s f or re consi dera t i on ).09- 56289 3 B e c aus e w e a f

f i rm the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s di s m i s s a l unde rR ul e 41( b) , w e do not co n si d er th e L ash g ari s’ ch al l en g es t o th e d i stri ctco u rt ’ s i n t erl o cu t o ry o rd ers. See A l-T orkiv. Kaem

pen , 78 F . 3d 13 81 , 13 86 (9th C i r. 19 96 ). T he L as hg ar i s’ re m ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.