alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.1




CERTIFICATION




I, Daniel
Imperato, certify that:




1.           I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Imperiali,
Inc.;




2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:


(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting; and




5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:  January
      20, 2009
                /s/Daniel
      ImperatoDaniel
      ImperatoPrincipal
      Executive Officer
#### Central City Brokerage Corporation, Respondent, v Ruben Acosta, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[853 NYS2d 545]

A party seeking to vacate a default must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for his nonappearance and a meritorious defense to the action *(see Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co.,*67 NY2d 138, 141 [1986]). Even assuming that Acosta had a viable defense to plaintiffs demand for a broker’s commission, he has failed to show a reasonable excuse for his default *(see Residential Bd. of Mgrs. of 99 Jane St. Condominium v Rockrose Dev. Corp.,*17 AD3d 194 [2005]). In view of ample documentary evidence that Acosta held out the place of service as his address, he may not now reasonably claim he was not properly served *(see*CPLR 308 [6]; *Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher v Global Nuclear Servs. & Supply,*280 AD2d 360, 361 [2001]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regal Rock, Inc. (the  "Company")  on
Form  10-QSB  for  the  period  ended May 31, 2006  as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

   1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:   January 29, 2007


/s/ Bruce Biles
-------------------------------------------
Bruce Biles, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-31297,  333-23095,  333-06081,  33-62543, 33-80594, 33-53432,
33-45469,  33-41945,  33-25230,  33-19851, 33-16625, and 33-48867) pertaining to
the Komag,  Incorporated  Deferred  Compensation  Plan, the Komag,  Incorporated
Restated 1987 Stock Option Plan, the Komag Material Technology,  Inc. 1995 Stock
Option Plan,  the Komag,  Incorporated  Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Komag,
Incorporated  Restated 1987 Stock Option Plan,  the Dastek  International  Stock
Option Plan, the Dastek,  Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan, and the 1997 Supplemental
Stock  Option Plan of our report  dated  January 22,  1999,  with respect to the
consolidated  financial statements and schedule of Komag,  Incorporated included
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 3, 1999.




                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Jose, California
April 1, 1999
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.10(A)

                             NUVEEN INVESTMENT TRUST

                   RENEWAL OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT


This Agreement made this 22nd day of May, 1999 by and between Nuveen Investment
Trust, a Massachusetts business trust (the "Fund"), and Nuveen Institutional
Advisory Corp., a Delaware corporation (the "Adviser");

WHEREAS, the parties hereto are the contracting parties under that certain
Management Agreement (the "Agreement") pursuant to which the Adviser furnishes
investment advisory and management services and certain other services to the
Fund; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees, at a meeting called for the purpose of reviewing
the Agreement, have approved the Agreement and its continuance until August 1,
2000 in the manner required by the Investment Company Act of 1940.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in the
Agreement, the parties hereto do hereby approve the continuance of the Agreement
in effect until August 1, 2000 and do ratify and confirm the Agreement in all
respects.


                                                 NUVEEN INVESTMENT TRUST


                                                 By:
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                       Vice President
ATTEST:


------------------------------------
         Assistant Secretary
                                                 NUVEEN INSTITUTIONAL
                                                 ADVISORY CORP.


                                                 By:
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                       Vice President
ATTEST:


------------------------------------
         Assistant Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 32224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15972]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Joint Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development and Clinical 
Science Research and Development Services Scientific Merit Review Board 
Subcommittee for Eligibility; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the 
Subcommittee for Eligibility of the Joint Biomedical Laboratory 
Research and Development and Clinical Science Research and Development 
Services Scientific Merit Review Board will meet on Monday, July 20, 
2009, from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. at the St. Gregory Luxury Hotel and 
Suites, 2033 M Street, NW., Washington, DC.
    The purpose of the Merit Review Board is to provide advice on the 
scientific quality, budget, safety and mission relevance of 
investigator-initiated research proposals submitted for VA merit review 
consideration. Proposals submitted for review by the Board involve a 
wide range of medical specialties within the general areas of 
biomedical, behavioral and clinical science research.
    The subcommittee meeting will be open to the public for 
approximately one-half hour at the start of the meeting to discuss the 
general status of the program. The remaining portion of the 
subcommittee meeting will be closed to the public for the review, 
discussion, examination, reference to staff, consultant critiques and 
evaluation, of non-clinician credentials and research proposals to be 
performed for the Department of Veterans Affairs.
    As provided by subsection 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, as amended, 
closing portions of a subcommittee meeting is in accordance with 5 
U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) and (c)(9)(B). Anyone who might plan to attend or 
would like to obtain a copy of minutes of the subcommittee meeting and 
roster of the members of the subcommittees should contact LeRoy G. 
Frey, PhD, Chief, Program Review (121F), Department of Veterans 
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420 at (202) 461-
1664.

    Dated: July 1, 2009.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-15972 Filed 7-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
905 A.2d 872

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ANTHONY MONTGOMERY, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

August 4, 2006.

ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted on the issue of defendant’s sentence, and the matter is summarily remanded to the trial court for resentencing in light of the Court’s decision in *State v. Pierce,*188 *N.J.*155, 902 A.2d 1195 (2006).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Market Data Consultants, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended May 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Wilson Cheung, President and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Wilson Cheung



Wilson Cheung, President and Chairman

December 6, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of RehabCare Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I John H. Short, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

                                                                                                                                                                                 
| By:    | /s/  John H. Short |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   | John H. Short                |
|   | President and                |
|   | Chief Executive Officer      |
|   | RehabCare Group, Inc.        |
|   | March 13, 2007               |
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 939 

Supporting the World Bank Group to lead a worldwide COVID–19 economic 

recovery effort. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2020 

Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the World Bank Group to lead a worldwide 

COVID–19 economic recovery effort. 

Whereas the worldwide COVID–19 pandemic is having a profound and serious impact on the global economy; 

Whereas the world is highly interconnected, and working together can defeat the spread of COVID–19; 

Whereas the poorest and most vulnerable countries could be 

hit the hardest by the COVID–19 pandemic by overwhelming their health care system and upending development projects; 

Whereas many of the world’s low- and middle-income countries are still in the early stages of the COVID–19 pandemic, but the effects of the pandemic are already being 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 939 IH 

felt, as health systems are strained, and many aspects of 

society are injured; 

Whereas it is in the international security and prosperity interest of the United States to bolster economic and political stability in developing countries; 

Whereas, since its creation in 1944, the World Bank Group 

has been dedicated to providing financial assistance to 

developing countries to promote economic development; 

Whereas the World Bank Group finances critical development 

projects that would otherwise go unfunded by private investors, is uniquely positioned to address cross-border development challenges, and can effectively allocate aid 

globally based on need; 

Whereas high-income countries will be able to recover from 

the COVID–19 pandemic on their own, but low- and middle-income countries will struggle and need economic and 

technical assistance the World Bank Group can provide; 

and 

Whereas, in April, the World Bank Group announced efforts 

to respond to the COVID–19 pandemic in order to 

strengthen developing country responses and shorten the 

time to economically and socially recover: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) the United States should support the World 

4 Bank Group to lead a worldwide effort to economi5 cally construct those areas around the world that 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 939 IH 

1 have been and will be economically devastated by the 

2 effects of the COVID–19 pandemic; and 

3 (2) the United States recognizes the world 

4 needs to work together more collaboratively in order 

5 to overcome our shared challenges. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
The Honorable Russell G. Clark, United States District Judge for the Western 1

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3576

___________

Marc Perkel, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

United States of America; United States * Western District of Missouri. 

House of Representatives, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: December 7, 1998

 Filed: December 28, 1998

___________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.

Marc Perkel appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his complaint seeking 1

an injunction ordering the federal government to remove Independent Counsel

Kenneth Starr&s report (Starr Report) from government-controlled internet sites. Perkel

alleged that the government’s dissemination of the Starr Report was likely to affect the

outcome of his candidacy for the United States House of Representatives. Perkel also
-2-

alleged that the report contained inappropriate graphic descriptions of sexual

encounters and secret grand jury testimony.

We conclude that Perkel does not have standing to sue for the removal of the

Starr Report, because the alleged potential effect on his candidacy is not fairly

traceable to the release of the Starr Report and is speculative. See In re Starr, 152 F.3d

741, 749 (8th Cir. 1998) (plaintiff lacked standing because he could not prove injury

suffered was fairly traceable to Starr’s conduct); Johnson v. Missouri, 142 F.3d 1087,

1088-90 (8th Cir. 1998) (prisoners attempting to challenge Missouri statute allowing

sanctions for frivolous lawsuits lacked standing, because timing and type of injury to

prisoners could not yet be determined as prisoners had not been sanctioned). Perkel

has not otherwise alleged any injury beyond that suffered by a large class of citizens.

See In re Starr, 152 F.3d at 748-49 (plaintiff could not prove alleged unethical conduct

of Independent Counsel Starr distinctly and personally injured plaintiff).

Because Perkel lacked standing to bring the action in the district court, we lack

jurisdiction to address the merits of his appeal. See Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better

Env’t, 118 S. Ct. 1003, 1020 (1998). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Loken, Circuit Judge, concurring.

I agree that appellant Marc Perkel lacked standing to bring this action in the

district court. The district court improperly looked at the merits of Perkel's claim

without initially addressing the issue of standing. In these circumstances, as Steel

Company v. Citizens for a Better Environment, 118 S. Ct. 1103 (1998), makes clear,

we should modify the district court's judgment to dismiss the complaint for lack of

standing, not dismiss the appeal.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
COUTokttE$.

0 App n$CuncL C Co-Counse1

Q F Subs For Federal C)ctenda Stbs For R.e*ined AUone>

D P Subs For Panel Attorney C Y Standby Cowt6eI

Prior AnornaYa mi

App runoot

O fleannan the ebove.etn# pemeq reptecued hse taetiSc4 nader oath or hen otheiwlae

e*iinfietl thri Cutt then he or alto (I) b laenclalI enshis t employ reunsel lad (2) dooe natwiab to walr e waiel end kcthe itoteate Ofnstire to inqaira, die attorney wheeaname appeara iii Item 13 is eppotnied to r Pt**4t tltb p$sMn tO 11th ftae OP.

Q Oih*t Tor

SwM e!Prraiding JudooyOrdernttheoiat

Date olOrder NunO Pr Tune Date

Rapaymani at partial Npky,neau erdamd om ilto peleac t6acflted Ir thia tarvita at Lime

IJ?PQiflttnenL U YS JO

• 4z

II. ATTORN5Y5 NAME (FL,zi Aa,e*

M,L, LpeI hsa, Iaclnd,qg atty au41x),

ND MAILING ARSS S

4’krW/ll,s, &

e%)i/ñs14 NAME AlSO MAILING ADDRE 05 LAW FIRM (Oaiy roaIde por

ô,-&—oq’

F3

CATBOORIES Mit,ae6 IIasthaitae oflire tsar e4tA da’ex)

ft ArnJ,gnmeiiLnnd!ot Plea

ft. Rai .,d Diirntee I.riueu

15,

a, MotIon HeenlOaft

a. Triala. SeeIeeeIna l4eaiina

r I,,ru....

C*Y4i4rn

ft. 01 riTotM asadthrloeal,.beete)

16.

1RATEPERRnUP—c TOTaLR

Ii. ‘Irevteaetaa oeadt.

e Lanai researeh mid 8sle atritine

d. Travel time

nous

TOTAL UATIlttCH.

CLAIMED AMOUNT ADJUSTED - - HOURS

MATNITECH, ADDITIONAL ADJUSTED I REVIRW

on

I TOTALS.

Lt.._ — —— I. —

‘——,,.‘,—...—..—,_._,

P1(0Mm TO

tTIONDKt.

IF OTIHIR THAN CA... MFLETION

31. CAnE OIIIPO$ITIQN

22. CLAIM STATUS Plna Peymoet C Inserim Peymani Nmtmber I Snpptementat Payment - Heea you pree’iauni applied to the cOatl (or Ompuntation andf*r reimhursemna ft,r limit C YES D Nt) if yea. cern yam pSid C YES C NO

OUter than front the Coon. here you at ie foul hne.1edgc has anyone else re5eleCd payment ‘COmptntaOaut or aeydnirtp of ratu om nit. other tour-to to tOnerrion iirh thin

rcoreaonmuien’ YES NO I(ycoeivodetaihonmtdldnnateheetn.I awear or attlrnu r5t IStIl at c,rrecl.rn of the haue atflememft,

S.gnauuee ytAO,;y , Dare -- 2.5. INCOT,JRTCOMP, 124 0ItTOFCOURTCOMP. OS, TRAVELEXFEHOES 26 OTLtDRiIXyENSEE 27 TOTALAMT,APPRJCUKL’.

2E,IGNATURE0FTHEPRF(EIDflSC(JDGP DATE 26o. JUOGE000E29, IN COURT COUP. Sf3. OLJ’rOP COURT COMP. Ii. TRAVEL ExPENSES 37. OTHER EXPENSES - 3, TOTAL AMT APPROVED

34 SIONATURE OP C1dIUPJUDOE, COURT OF AFPEALO (OR DELEGATE) PapeeeI appeared DATE Ma, Jl,IDtjE COPE

Ia earns a! the neanurany ikptjJiId aoue.tl,

TOTcL P.2
General Survey System (GSS): 

A Mobile Technologies System for Collecting 

and Managing Study Data

Data Capture Technology Forum

March 18, 2010

Donna Medeiros

Research Computing Division

RTI International

djm@rti.org

919.541-8788
Today’s Presentation

– GSS Overview

– Technologies 

– Point of Purchase Study (Vietnam)

– Lessons Learned and Next Steps
GSS Software Development Features

PC based development software (IDE):

• Questionnaire programming (‘Designer’)

• Language support

• System configuration and setup – at data 

collection site(s)

• Data File construction for use in Analysis
Handheld Equipment

•HP iPAQ—handheld computer, 

windows Mobile, SQL CE

•SD card—inserted into the iPAQ, 

stores data externally 

•GPS Receiver—inserts into the 

iPAQ and used during enumeration
GSS Use

Highly Mobile Data Capture system

•Household doorway screening and 

interviewing

•Vendor listing and vendor surveys

•Intercept surveys

•Hospitals surveys

•Inventories 

WHO, Bangladesh
Survey System Implementation Steps

1. Questionnaire Design and Programming 

2. Data Management (Transfer and Aggregation)

3. Data Processing
GSS Developer’s Tools (IDE) Main Menu 

Survey: Vietnam Point of Purchase (VPOP) 

• Purpose: Collect point of purchase sales baseline 

data for countries that have signed the WHO 

Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Pilot 

in Vietnam.

• Collaboration between RTI, JHU School of Global 

Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Vietnam 

General Statistical Office

• Key info/Research questions: 

• Density of Sales, pricing, where and how much is 

being sold, industry presence, advertising
VPOP Technology Advancements

Hanoi Medical 

University

Relied on Technology:

GPS 

-Field staff area ‘locator’ during 

counting and listing

-Recorded vendor location 

Enumeration and Selection

-Counting and listing of Vendors

-Dynamic selection for purchases
GPS 

• System outputs Coordinates such as 

21 02.69' N 105 48.36' E 

• For use in maps and analysis
Lessons Learned

• Hardware choice is effective for this kind of survey

– Good battery life 

– Works well in mobile environments

– Well received by interviewing staff

• Visual Development Environment needed: Developers 

Software components was updated to IDE

• Software system is robust and can be taught to 

interviewers in a few days training

• Data File generation important for reporting and analysis 

Imports directly into SAS, SPSS, MS Access, etc 
Next Steps

• Look to emerging platforms

– Smart phones

• Google Android

• Apple

– Cell based data transmission 

– Port to tablet based net books

• More Data Management and 

processing capability

– Validations and QC reporting

– Monitoring reports

– Documentation