alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSE SAN JUAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-607

[August 24, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Lisa M. Porter, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 11007808 CF10A.

Fairuze Sofia of The Sofia Law Firm, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128547 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 128547 

 COA: 251413 

Cass CC: 03-010024-FH 

DAVID DEWAYNE COULSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 1, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

JOAN MULLIN, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE 

ESTATE OF ROBERT MULLIN, deceased,

and JOAN MULLIN, individually,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

ADMINISTRATOR KAREN BALICKI, et 

al.,

 Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-247 (MLC)

 O R D E R

For the reasons stated in the Court’s Memorandum Opinion 

dated November 1, 2013, IT IS on this 1st day of November, 

2013, ORDERED that the motion to dismiss by Defendants 

Administrator Karen Balicki, Director Robert Patterson, Director 

Marie Dunlap-Pryce, Officer Dimler, and Beatrice Teel, R.N.,

(dkt. entry no. 145) is GRANTED; and it is further 

ORDERED that the motion for judgment on the pleadings by 

Defendant Jane Byrd, L.P.N., (dkt. entry no. 144) is GRANTED IN 

PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:

GRANTED as to the claims against Jane Byrd, L.P.N., in 

her official capacity; and

GRANTED as to the state common-law claims against Jane 

Byrd, L.P.N.; and

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG Document 154 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 2031
2

DENIED as to the constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 and N.J.S.A. 10:6-1 et seq. against Jane Byrd, L.P.N., in 

her individual or personal capacity; and it is further

ORDERED that all claims against Defendants Administrator 

Karen Balicki, Director Robert Patterson, Director Marie DunlapPryce, Officer Dimler, and Beatrice Teel, R.N., are DISMISSED; 

and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will designate the 

action insofar as it is brought against Defendants Administrator 

Karen Balicki, Director Robert Patterson, Director Marie DunlapPryce, Officer Dimler, and Beatrice Teel, R.N., as TERMINATED; 

and it is further

ORDERED that the claims asserted against Defendant Jane 

Byrd, L.P.N., in her official capacity, and the state common-law 

claims asserted against her, are DISMISSED; and it is further

NOTED that Defendants Jane Byrd, L.P.N., and Kintock Group 

are the only viable defendants remaining in the action, and that 

the Clerk of the Court should designate the action insofar as it 

is brought against all other defendants as TERMINATED; and it is 

further

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG Document 154 Filed 11/01/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 2032
3

ORDERED that the motion filed on the docket under docket 

entry number 146 is ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATED as unnecessary.

 s/ Mary L. Cooper 

MARY L. COOPER

United States District Judge

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG Document 154 Filed 11/01/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 2033
EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 Nos. 333-07415, 333-68935, 333-79995, 333-84819, 333-86805 and
333-92815) of BNP Residential Properties, Inc. of our report dated January 8,
2002, except for Notes 3 and 11 as to which the date is February 4, 2002, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of BNP Residential
Properties, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2001.






                                                      /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP




Raleigh, North Carolina
March 25, 2002





                                       54
<PAGE>
---

EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of AmerAlia, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bill H. Gunn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Bill H. Gunn


Bill H. Gunn


Chief Executive Officer


Principal Executive Officer





October 8, 2009





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AmerAlia, Inc. and will be retained by AmerAlia, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE**

**OFFICEROF HILAND HOLDINGS GP, LP**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with theaccompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31,2007 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Harold Hamm, Interim Chief Executive Officer and Presidentof Hiland Partners GP Holdings, LLC, the general partner of Hiland Holdings GP,LP (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.             The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.
| Date: May 10, 2007 | /s/ Harold Hamm                                |   |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|               | Harold Hamm                                    |
|               | Interim Chief Executive Officer and  President |

 

1

----
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00006-CR

Raul Garza Salazar

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2013-DCR-1700-I

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 16, 2015
PACTS #: 60051

Name of Judicial Officer: THE HONORABLE CLAIRE C. CECCHI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Name of Sentencing Judicial Officer: THE HONORABLE DICKINSON R. DEBEVOISE

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Date of Original Sentence: 04/10/20 12Original Offense: Possession of a Weapon by a Convicted FelonOriginal Sentence: 71 months imprisonment, 3 years supervised release; $100 Special Assessment

Special Conditions: Alcohol/Substance Abuse Testing and Treatment

Type of Supervision: Supervised Release Date Supervision Commenced: 06/26/2015

NONCOMPLIANCE SUMMARY

The offender has not complied with the following condition(s) ofsupervision:

Violation Number Nature of Noncompliance

The offender has violated the special supervision condition which states ‘Youshall refrain from the illegal possession and use of drugs, including

prescription medication not prescribed in your name, and the use of alcohol,

and shall submit to urinalysis or other forms of testing to ensure compliance.it is further ordered that you shall submit to evaluation and treatment, on an

outpatient or inpatient basis, as approved by the U.S. Probation Office. Youshall abide by the rules of any program and shall remain in treatment untilsatisfactorily discharged by the Court. You shall alert all medicalprofessionals of any prior substance abuse history, including any prior historyof prescription drug abuse. The Probation Officer shall supervise yourcompliance with this condition.’During an office visit on March 14, 2018, a urine sample was requested from

the offender, which tested positive for marijuana via a 10-panel instant test.

The offender verbally admitted to use approximately four days prior, andsigned a Drug Admission Form.
p

p

its entirety, prior to his supervision termination date. He will also be frequently tested throughout the

remainder of supervision. The offender is aware that the Court would be notified of this noncomplianceand an official judicial written reprimand requested.

Respectfully submitted,

L R Digitally signed by UI S Luis R. Gonzalez

G I Date: 2018.03.15 onzaez 17:23:11 -0400

By: Gisella M. Bassolino

U.S. Probation Officer

Date: 03/15/2018

The Court’s endorsement ofthis petition wilt serve as an official written reprimand to the offender

unless the Court directs that alternative action be taken asfollows:

F Submit a Request for Modifying the Conditions or Term of Supervision

F Submit a Request for Warrant or SummonsF Other

Signature ofJudicial Officer

fr’-—_-’_-’ Ct

Date
FOM1 Art 4 Appendices 

Appendix A - Widow(er) Legislative History 

The Widow(er) Legislative History is inRCM 2.1, Appendix A. 

Appendix B – Surviving Young Mother/Father Legislative History 

The Surviving Young Mother/Father Insurance Annuity Legislative History is in 

RCM 2.3, Appendix A 

Appendix C - Surviving Child’s Legislative History 

The surviving Child’s Insurance Annuity Legislative History is in RCM 2.4, Appendix A. 

Appendix D - Surviving Parent’s Legislative History 

The surviving Parent’s Insurance Annuity Legislative History is in RCM 2.5, Appendix A. 

FOM1 Art 4 Appendices Revised APR 5, 2017 Page 1 of 1
Labor Employer Reporting Instructions

Appendix VI: Table of Earnings Bases and Tax Rates

Maximum Earnings Base and Tax Rate

Tier I Tier II RUIA

YEAR Base

Employer & 

Employee Base Employer Employee

Monthly 

Base Employer

1985 $39,600 7.05 $29,700 13.75 3.5 $600 8.0

1986 $42,000 7.15 $31,500 14.75 4.25 $600 8.0

1987 $43,800 7.15 $32,700 14.75 4.25 $600 8.0

1988 $45,000 7.51 $33,600 14.75 4.25 $600 8.0

1989 $48,000 7.51 $35,700 16.1 4.9 $710 8.0

1990 $51,300 7.65 $38,100 16.1 4.9 $745 8.0

1991 $53,400 7.65 $39,600 16.1 4.9 $765 *

1992 $55,500 7.65 $41,400 16.1 4.9 $785 *

1993 $57,600 7.65 $42,900 16.1 4.9 $810 *

1994 $60,600 7.65 $45,000 16.1 4.9 $840 *

1995 $61,200 7.65 $45,300 16.1 4.9 $850 *

1996 $62,700 7.65 $46,500 16.1 4.9 $865 *

1997 $65,400 7.65 $48,600 16.1 4.9 $890 *

1998 $68,400 7.65 $50,700 16.1 4.9 $925 *

1999 $72,600 7.65 $53,700 16.1 4.9 $970 *

2000 $76,200 7.65 $56,700 16.1 4.9 $1,005 *

2001 $80,400 7.65 $59,700 16.1 4.9 $1,050 *

2002 $84,900 7.65 $63,000 15.6 4.9 $1,100 *

2003 $87,000 7.65 $64,500 14.2 4.9 $1,120 *

2004 $87,900 7.65 $65,100 13.1 4.9 $1,030 *

2005 $90,000 7.65 $66,900 12.6 4.4 $1,150 *

2006 $94,200 7.65 $69,900 12.6 4.4 $1,195 *

2007 $97,500 7.65 $72,600 12.1 3.9 $1,230 *

2008 $102,000 7.65 $75,900 12.1 3.9 $1,280 *

2009 $106,800 7.65 $79,200 12.1 3.9 $1,330 *

2010 $106,800 7.65 $79,200 12.1 3.9 $1,330 *

2011 $106,800 7.65 $79,200 12.1 3.9 $1,330 *

2012 $110,100 7.65 $81,900 12.1 3.9 $1,365 *

2013 $113,700 7.65 $84,300 12.6 4.4 $1,405 *

2014 $117,000 7.65 $87,000 12.6 4.4 $1,440 *

2015 $118,500 7.65 $88,200 13.1 4.9 $1,455 *

2016 $118,500 7.65 $88,200 13.1 4.9 $1,455 *

2017 $127,200 7.65 $94,500 13.1 4.9 $1,545 *

2018 $128,400 7.65 $95,400 13.1 4.9 $1,560 *

2019 $132,900 7.65 $98,700 13.1 4.9 $1,605 *

2020 $137,700 7.65 $102,300 13.1 4.9 $1,655 *

* Rate determined for each employer based on experience of their employees.

Current rates and future projections are on RRB web site. Projections of future earnings bases 

are updated in January and July.
M--l3-W-06t?6-(K Tri*l Caus^_£Wr£W3_

ToW/KE VIILLOMS £> X/l/ W &EST/&ZT COURT 6F

\/s. 5 aa* flriTKxer tftf/?T

©Ei imMrEtfrTEm 5 DMLM CoUl^lmBSm.N

ALS

f i i , a JUL 27 2015

To im *«M£ XU06E ofSAW Ccu&7"<

ti&d CtmEk TTbtomlK \Ui'llf'air\S^Appdlani Jro-??,1n \h*. <zboV^ sfyfe number

(kwh C<w&sf1\*)fcs'$\ti m\idt\ h this Court fe<ia?5iSny. for Bcbns/ar) &r

Mm mrsaani h "HX/hA H^i \o -f/Je •<* /floh'eh for rfh&rfaEtflttft

toitijshu +he Comply/h0 u,% flak h,E(b) £ t^ T^K(#«!8*w*als

Tt JUL 27 2015

Appellant has limikd AcZZSS to thz French M,folxA*>fn Um'i LduJ

LlWar\f fo research and ahh/n fhz Occum^nPs to support his 17/dhon

tor &?Aear/ncj ustthin 5achi,'m^<

ttT.tXP. In.Sfh)

{K\Awx\U\\ braJifi'w Ji*ktt friz &r th* Ikhrar/^ *f L!s' PeMi*/i

4r Dfcreh'Bnary HzvtevJ is da? nn rXifid % Sol5*

K1%elM faqu&t -Sr a %d<xy indention *l time h> liih'aa-k th? )ssur,

CO Due h'AppzllahPs frh¥/n?rnznh o\n4 Access k a fopy JYIachfn? and Lau;

Law Library -fe sife/'n -/M fnkrmbon 6? thz LavJ and Documents

to 5uppert- his M/hdn' Hr DfeCM\ibn«ry fev/w <

Q))Jh,f h tieAppdUPs -fr/d Aequ&i in Sue ahau*-C<WS* reqarJ/nQ

Id* {W> ih qy?5<har\<

Cc/cetyM'ams Mohan HrEthrrfon o%Tim* M/e /^^^WW/ /W/
Most parents work when they have young 

children, according to data from the U.S. 

Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). But not 

all parents do. 

The charts show the number of women and men in 

2006 who worked—or didn’t work—when their children were under 6 years of age and living with them. 

Women were much less likely than men to work if they 

had infants or toddlers at home. And about 28 percent 

of employed women worked part-time during their 

children’s early years. Although not shown on the chart, 

the number of dads who didn’t work was slightly higher 

if they had older children.

Of parents who were not employed, most were not 

5NEMPLOYED

.OTSEEKINGWORK

%MPLOYEDPARTTIME

%MPLOYEDFULLTIME









.OTSEEKINGWORK

%MPLOYEDPARTTIME

%MPLOYEDFULLTIME

5NEMPLOYED

seeking work. But some were actively looking for jobs 

and were thus counted as unemployed. 

For many parents, how long they remain in the labor 

force while their children are young depends on whether 

they have flexible work schedules. To learn about arranging for flexible work, see “Flexible work: Adjusting 

the when and where of your job,” by Elka Maria Torpey, 

elsewhere in this issue of the Quarterly.

Data in the chart come from the Current Population 

Survey. For more information about parents and work, 

write to BLS, Division of Labor Force Statistics, Suite 

4675, 2 Massachusetts Avenue NE., Washington, D.C. 

20212; call (202) 691-6378; or see the BLS news release 

online at www.bls.gov/news.release/famee.nr0.htm.

5NEMP

%MPLOYEDPARTTIM

%MPLO









.OTSEEKINGWORK

%MPLOYEDPARTTIME

%MPLOYEDFULLTIME

5NEMPLOYED

Employment status of men and women who 

have children under 6 years of age, 2006

Men

Women

Parents and work, 2006

48 Occupational Outlook Quarterly • Summer 2007
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Globalink, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the six months ended June 30, 2007 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Robin Young
                                 ----------------------
                                 Robin Young
                                 Chief Executive Officer

August 20, 2007

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Globalink, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the six months ended June 30, 2007 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Ben Choi
                                 ----------------------
                                 Ben Choi
                                 Chief Executive Officer

August 20, 2007
EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We  consent  to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form  S-8  (File  Nos. 33-33497, 33-40038, 33-60214 and 33-60644) of our reports
dated  August  21,  2001  relating  to  the consolidated financial statements of
Criticare  Systems, Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
for  the  year  ended  June  30,  2001.



/s/  BDO  Seidman,  LLP
Milwaukee,  Wisconsin
May 20, 2002
H. Res. 870 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 27, 2020. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE: Ms. Torres Small of 

New Mexico. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, ranked as follows on the following standing committees of the House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Khanna (to rank immediately after Mr. Cooper). 

COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM: Mr. Khanna 

(to rank immediately after Mr. Rouda). 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**Exhibit 10.3****ASSIGNMENT AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT**Industry Track Agreement     Western Iowa Energy, LLC, an Iowa limited liability company (“Assignor”) for valuableconsideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, hereby grants,pledges, and assigns to Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA (“Assignee”), all of the Assignor’sright, title and interest in and to:That certain Industry Track Agreement between Assignor and the ChicagoCentral and Pacific Railroad Company dated as of the 11th day ofApril, 2006 pursuant to which Chicago Central and Pacific Railroad Companywill provide railroad services to Western Iowa Energy, LLC pursuant to theterms contained in such Industry Track Agreement.     It is the intention of Assignor that by this assignment Assignee shall acquire all of therights and obligations previously enjoyed by the Assignor as owner under the Industry TrackAgreement.     Assignor agrees to execute such other documents as may reasonably be requested by Assignee,from time to time to evidence the above and foregoing assignment.       Dated: ~~April~~ June 15, 2006. Western Iowa Energy, LLC           By: *s/s John Geake*     Its: Chairman  By its execution hereof, Chicago Central and Pacific Railroad Company consents to and acknowledgesthe foregoing collateral assignment of the described agreement.       Dated: ~~April~~ June 15, 2006. Chicago Central and Pacific Railroad Company           By: *s/s Ghislain Houle*     Its: Vice-President-Treasurer  
 

 
       STATE OF IOWA              )      )ss.   COUNTY OF SAC              )   On this 5th day of June, 2006, before me, the undersigned, a NotaryPublic, personally appeared John Geake, Chairman of Western Iowa Energy, LLC onbehalf of said entity, who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed thesame as his voluntary act and deed.     Notarial Seal SHARON FERTIG *s/s Sharon Fertig*  Commission Number 736092 Sharon Fertig     Notary PublicIowa My Commission Expires In and for said State  8-15-08 My Commission Expires: 8-15-08         STATE OF    )                 )ss.   COUNTY OF    )            On this ___day of ___, 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public, personally appeared                    ,                      of Chicago Central and Pacific Railroad Company on behalf ofsaid entity, who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same ashis voluntary act and deed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dekania Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas H. Friedberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  |                                                
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 15, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Thomas H. Friedberg
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Thomas H. Friedberg                            
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
An unpublisHed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123,

‘Supreme Court
oF
Nevana

0 984 ABS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DREW ESPINOZA, No. 68005
Appellant,
vs. FILED
CITY OF HENDERSON, JUL 24 205
Respondent.

CueTEASESG LINDEMAN
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL wT
Y CLERK

This is an appeal from a district court order in a criminal
matter. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Valerie Adair,
Judge.

Appellant’s counsel has filed a notice of voluntary withdrawal
of this appeal. Counsel advises this court that he has informed appellant
of the legal consequences of voluntarily withdrawing this appeal, including
that appellant cannot hereafter seek to reinstate this appeal, and that any
issues that were or could have been brought in this appeal are forever
waived. Having been so informed; appellant consents to a voluntary
dismissal of this appeal. Cause appearing, we

ORDER thjsappeal DISMISSED.

union pommname J,

Parraguirre 0

Loewe J Chany J

Douglas , Cherry

ce: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge
William S. Skupa
Attorney General/Carson City
Henderson City Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk

jeaee
a