alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE RESTATED FOR QUARTERS 1,2,3 FOR YEAR ENDED 1/31/97
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>            <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS           6-MOS          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              JAN-31-1997     JAN-31-1997    JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 FEB-01-1996     MAY-01-1996    AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                   APR-30-1996     JUL-31-1996    OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                              858             781             573  
<SECURITIES>                          0               0               0     
<RECEIVABLES>                     4,627           4,694           6,264     
<ALLOWANCES>                       (331)           (539)           (506)    
<INVENTORY>                      32,516          25,646          36,403   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 46,274          38,394          55,378   
<PP&E>                           51,968          53,031          54,949   
<DEPRECIATION>                  (30,827)        (31,329)        (32,375)  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   69,217          62,095          79,950   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            31,784          25,822          35,933   
<BONDS>                               0               0               0   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0               0               0   
<PREFERRED>                           0               0               0   
<COMMON>                             83              83              83   
<OTHER-SE>                       30,463          29,426          27,757   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     69,217          62,095          79,950   
<SALES>                          40,730          49,133          41,326   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 36,501          44,186          39,368   
<CGS>                            19,245          22,872          20,282   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    40,223          45,833          41,979   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    (13)            (19)            (15)  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0               0               0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   (8)            102             199   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (3,701)         (1,753)         (2,795)  
<INCOME-TAX>                     (1,480)           (701)         (1,118)  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (2,221)         (1,052)         (1,677)  
<DISCONTINUED>                        0               0               0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0               0               0   
<CHANGES>                             0               0               0   
<NET-INCOME>                     (2,221)         (1,052)         (1,677)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     (0.27)          (0.13)          (0.20)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (0.27)          (0.13)          (0.20)   
                                


</TABLE>
Case 3:11-mj-02509-DEA   Document 8   Filed 02/17/11   Page 1 of 3 PageID: 54

Case 3:11-mj-02509-DEA   Document 8   Filed 02/17/11   Page 2 of 3 PageID: 55

Case 3:11-mj-02509-DEA   Document 8   Filed 02/17/11   Page 3 of 3 PageID: 56
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
ART. 5 FOR 12-MOS 10-K
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000813040
<NAME> GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,736
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                       198
<INVENTORY>                                      5,705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,374
<PP&E>                                         513,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                 151,468
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 643,378
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          135,623
<BONDS>                                        225,688
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     60,000
<COMMON>                                           603
<OTHER-SE>                                     157,410
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   643,378
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               845,996
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  512,179
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,899
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,932
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (16,856)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,232
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,048
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Patrick Harris, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 444]

Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki A. Scherer, J.), rendered on or about July 14, 2004, unanimously affirmed.

*482Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Friedman, Gonzalez, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
EXHIBIT 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999



Subsidiary of Boddie-Noell Properties, Inc.:

     Subsidiary name:                Boddie-Noell Properties Limited Partnership
     State of organization:          Delaware
     Business name:                  Boddie-Noell Properties Limited Partnership

Subsidiaries of Boddie-Noell Properties Limited Partnership:

     Subsidiary name:                BNP Realty, LLC
     State of organization:          North Carolina
     Business name:                  BNP Realty, LLC

     Subsidiary name:                BNP/Chrysson Phase I, LLC
     State of organization:          North Carolina
     Business name:                  BNP/Chrysson Phase I, LLC

     Subsidiary name:                BNP Chason Ridge, LLC
     State of organization:          North Carolina
     Business name:                  BNP Chason Ridge, LLC

Subsidiary of BNP Realty, LLC:

     Subsidiary name:                BNP Management, Inc.
     State of organization:          North Carolina
     Business name:                  BNP Management, Inc.

                                       49
<PAGE>
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan 

ORDER 

Stonecrest Building Company v Chicago Title Insurance Company 

Docket No. 319841/319842 

LC No. 2008-001055 CH 

Amy Ronayne Krause 

Presiding Judge 

Kirsten Frank Kelly 

Douglas B. Shapiro 

Judges 

The Court orders that the motion for reconsideration is GRANTED, and this Court's 

opinion issued April 7, 2015 is hereby VACATED. A new opinion is attached to this order. 

Kelly, K. F., J., would deny the motion for reconsideration. 

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr., Chief Clerk, on 

JUL 2 .1 2015 

Date
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-50845

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUIS RICO-URITA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. P-98-CR-53-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 6, 1999

Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Luis Rico-Urita appeals the sentence he received after he

pleaded guilty to importing marijuana and possessing marijuana

with intent to distribute. Rico argues that the district court’s

determination that there was no evidence of a larger drug

smuggling operation was clearly erroneous. Rico also argues that

the district court misapplied U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 when it stated

that Rico failed to show that he was “less culpable than any
No. 

-2-

other drug courier.” Rico, however, failed to meet his burden of

proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, his reduced role in

the offense. United States v. Zuniga, 18 F.3d 1254, 1261 (5th

Cir. 1994). 

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15235]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a), Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on March 19, 2009, Wildlife 
Laboratories Inc., 1401 Duff Drive, Suite 400, Fort Collins, Colorado 
80524, made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as a bulk manufacturer of Carfentanil (9743), a basic 
class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company will manufacture the above listed controlled substance 
for sale to veterinary pharmacies, zoos, and for other animal and 
wildlife applications.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently 
registered with DEA to manufacture such a substance, may file comments 
or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 
21 CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than August 25, 2009.

    Dated: June 22, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-15235 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Case 2:10-cr-00851-CCC   Document 139   Filed 10/20/11   Page 1 of 1 PageID: 763
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metals USA Holdings Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Periodic Report), I, C. Lourenco Goncalves, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. To my knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the
Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                            
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 2, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    C. LOURENCO GONCALVES                               
|                        |  |  |  | C. Lourenco Goncalves President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Cleartronic, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |    |  |                                                            
|----------------------- |  | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |    |  |                                                            
|Date: February 16, 2010 |  |    |  | /s/ Larry Reid                                             
|                        |  | By |  | Larry Reid                                                 
|                        |  |    |  | Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6936

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SONNY CARLTON MEEKS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-95-42, CA-98-532-2)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 4, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sonny Carlton Meeks, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Meeks, Nos. CR-95-42; CA98-532-2 (E.D. Va. May 21, 1998). We have reviewed the record and

find that Appellant’s motion was not timely filed in the district

court. See Brown v. Angelone, ___ F.3d ___, 1998 WL 389030, at *6

(4th Cir. July 14, 1998) (determining the limitation period with

regard to post-AEDPA 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)

petitions in cases where the conviction became final prior to the

statute’s enactment). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
#### Alberta Harris, Appellant, v City of New York Health & Hospitals Corporation, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[856 NYS2d 11]

The 76-year-old plaintiff tripped and fell on a raised portion *322of overlapping floor mats in the lobby of Lincoln Hospital, which is operated and maintained by defendant. The uncontroverted evidence at trial indicated that she suffered tears to the menisci of both knees and underwent arthroscopic surgery on her left knee, which had been operated on twice for a torn meniscus before the accident. Plaintiff was bedridden for about two weeks after the accident and two weeks after the surgery and received physical therapy for nine months. She walks with a cane, may require a knee replacement in 10 to 15 years, and is in constant pain. However, she is able to live independently, to do her own shopping and laundry and to travel by public transportation, and she is able to walk two blocks at a slow pace. She takes the same pain medication as she was taking before the accident.

The record supports the trial court’s reduction of the jury awards, which “ deviate[d] materially from what would be reasonable compensation” (CPLR 5501 [c]). However, the conditional reduction for future pain and suffering was excessive to the extent indicated. Concur—Tom, J.P., Buckley, Sweeny and Moskowitz, JJ.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ALVIN MILLER, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-17

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 27, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; William D. Sites, Judge. 

Alvin Miller, pro se. 

PER CURIAM. 

Alvin Miller appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief, in which he raised two claims of 

ineffective assistance of counsel regarding his conviction of attempted sexual battery. 

We affirm the denial of his second claim without comment. As to his first claim, Mr. 

Miller argues that "low count number" testing had been utilized in his case and was 
- 2 -

inadmissible under sections 90.7021 and 90.703, Florida Statutes (2015), that possible 

contamination of the DNA samples had occurred, and that the population frequency 

statistics were unreliable. The limited record attached to the postconviction court's 

order does not conclusively refute that claim. See Foster v. State, 810 So. 2d 910, 914 

(Fla. 2002); Wesby v. State, 230 So. 3d 939, 941 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). We therefore 

reverse the summary denial of Mr. Miller's first claim and remand for the court to either 

attach portions of the record that conclusively refute the claim or convene an evidentiary 

hearing.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

1Section 90.702, which states that an expert may testify in the form of an 

opinion if: "(1) The testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data; (2) [t]he testimony is 

the product of reliable principles and methods; and (3) [t]he witness has applied the 

principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case," codified the test set forth in 

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and was applicable 

at the time of Mr. Miller's trial.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED 
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gordon Clayton, the Chief Executive Officer of Find The World Interactive, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: May 14, 2007

/s/ Gordon Clayton

--------------------------------

Name: Gordon Clayton

Title: Chief Executive Officer
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 1 of 39 PageID: 1
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 2 of 39 PageID: 2
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 3 of 39 PageID: 3
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 4 of 39 PageID: 4
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 5 of 39 PageID: 5
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 6 of 39 PageID: 6
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 7 of 39 PageID: 7
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 8 of 39 PageID: 8
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 9 of 39 PageID: 9
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 10 of 39 PageID: 10
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 11 of 39 PageID: 11
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 12 of 39 PageID: 12
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 13 of 39 PageID: 13
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 14 of 39 PageID: 14
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 15 of 39 PageID: 15
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 16 of 39 PageID: 16
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 17 of 39 PageID: 17
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 18 of 39 PageID: 18
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 19 of 39 PageID: 19
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 20 of 39 PageID: 20
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 21 of 39 PageID: 21
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 22 of 39 PageID: 22
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 23 of 39 PageID: 23
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 24 of 39 PageID: 24
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 25 of 39 PageID: 25
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 26 of 39 PageID: 26
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 27 of 39 PageID: 27
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 28 of 39 PageID: 28
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 29 of 39 PageID: 29
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 30 of 39 PageID: 30
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 31 of 39 PageID: 31
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 32 of 39 PageID: 32
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 33 of 39 PageID: 33
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 34 of 39 PageID: 34
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 35 of 39 PageID: 35
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 36 of 39 PageID: 36
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 37 of 39 PageID: 37
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 38 of 39 PageID: 38
Case 2:10-cv-06269-SRC-MAS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 39 of 39 PageID: 39
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ John Quandahl                                                |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | John      Quandahl                                               |
|   | Chief      Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer |
|   | November      12, 2010                                           |

----