alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING

vs. ORDER

AARON’S, [NC. and JOHN DOES 1-25,

Defendant.

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on February 7, 2012, for a telephonic

status conference; Andrew Wolf Esq., of Wolf Law Firm, LLC, and Michael J. Quirk, Esq. ofWilliams Cuker Berezofsky, LLC, appearing on behalf of Plaintiff Margaret Korrow, and

Michael R. McDonald, Esq., and Jennifer Marino Thibodaux, Esq., of Gibbons RC., appearingon behalf of Defendant Aaron’s, Inc.;

WHEREAS, the Court entered a Pretrial Scheduling Order (“PTSO”) on November 22,

2011;

WHEREAS, the PTSO was amended to correct a typographical error on November 28,

2011;

WHEREAS, during the February 7, 2012 status conference, the Court and the parties

agreed to extend certain dates in the PTSO by approximately sixty (60) days; and for good cause

shown,

IT IS on this day ol Februar 2012 ORDERED that

I Any motion to amend the pleadings or join new parties must be with leave of

Court and filed no later than April 13, 2012, and made returnable on May 7, 2012.

41752692 vl

110239-71728
certification is to identi’ the expert by name and subject area no later than June 30, 2012.

4. The parties shall serve any affirmative expert reports with regard to the class

certification issues no later than July 31, 2012.

5. The parties shall serve any rebuttal expert reports with regard to the class

certification issues no later than August 31, 2012.

6. The parties will complete all expert discovery with regard to the class

certification issues by October 1, 2012.

7. Plaintiff must file the class certification motion by November 9, 2012, and made

returnable on December 3, 2012.

8. A Settlement Conference will be conducted by the undersigned, at the Clarkson S.

Fisher United States Courthouse, Trenton, New Jersey, on April 27, 2012 at 10:00 a,m.

Counsel and a representative for Defendant with full authority to settle the case are to be

present. Plaintiff’s counsel is to have full authority to settle. Any failure in this regard shall

result in the imposition of sanctions.

9. Five (5) days before the Settlement Conference, each party is to submit to

Chambers a confidential letter, on an ex pane basis. not to exceed five pages in total,

summarizing the relevant facts, the respective legal positions, the status of the case, and the

party’s position on settlement, including any settlement discussions that have taken place in

2

#1752692 vi

1 1O2397 1728
/_ / / / /

I

3

11752692 vi

I 10239-71728
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 127 (Monday, July 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15771]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Veterans' Employment and 
Training


The Advisory Committee on Veterans' Employment, Training and 
Employer Outreach (ACVETEO); Notice of Open Meeting

    The Advisory Committee on Veterans' Employment, Training and 
Employer Outreach (ACVETEO) was established pursuant to Title II of the 
Veterans' Housing Opportunity and Benefits Improvement Act of 2006 
(Pub. L. 109-233) and section 9 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(FACA) (Pub. L. 92-462, Title 5 U.S.C. app.II). The authority of the 
ACVETEO is codified in Title 38 U.S. Code, section 4110.
    The ACVETEO is responsible for assessing employment and training 
needs of veterans; determining the extent to which the programs and 
activities of the U.S. Department of Labor meet these needs; and 
assisting to conduct outreach to employers seeking to hire veterans. 
The ACVETEO will conduct a business meeting on Wednesday, August 5, 
2009 from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., at the Hyatt Regency Washington on 
Capitol Hill Hotel, 400 New Jersey Avenue, NW., Ticonderoga room lower 
level, Washington, DC 20001.
    The ACVETEO will discuss programs to assist veterans seeking 
employment and to raise employer awareness as to the advantages of 
hiring veterans, with special emphasis on employer outreach and wounded 
and injured veterans. There will be an opportunity for persons or 
organizations to address the committee. Any individual or organization 
that wishes to do so should contact Margaret Hill Watts at (202) 693-
4744. Time constraints may limit the number of presentations.
    Individuals needing special accommodations should notify Margaret 
Hill Watts at (202) 693-4744 by July 13, 2009.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 29th day of June 2009.
John M. McWilliam,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Veterans' Employment and Training Service.
[FR Doc. E9-15771 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-79-P
#### Seven Seventeen HB Philadelphia No. *2,*Appellee and Cross-Appellant, et al., *v.*Franklin County Board of Revision et al., Appellees; Board of Education of the Columbus City School District, Appellant and Cross-Appellee.

[Cite as *Seven Seventeen HB Philadelphia No. 2 v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision,*111 Ohio St.3d 1215, 2006-Ohio-5608.]

(No. 2006-0268

Submitted August 9, 2006

Decided November 1, 2006.)

{¶ 1} The appeal and the cross-appeal are dismissed, sua sponte, on the authority of *Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision,*110 Ohio St.3d 1242, 2006-Ohio-4091, 852 N.E.2d 178.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J.,

dissents for the reason stated in his dissent in *Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision,*110 Ohio St.3d 1242, 2006-Ohio-4091, 852 N.E.2d 178, ¶ 5.

*1216Martin Hughes *&*Associates, Martin J. Hughes III, and Jackie Lynn Hager, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P., Greg R. Wehrer, and Steven F. Mount, for appellee and cross-appellant.
#### 210-220-230 Owners Corp., Respondent, v John DeRaffele, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 776]

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant is not a holder of unsold shares of the plaintiff, appurtenant to certain cooperative apartments, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered July 15, 2005, which denied his motion, inter alia, for a preliminary injunction restraining the plaintiff from interfering with his renting or selling certain cooperative apartments, and granted the plaintiffs cross motion, in effect, for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for the entry of a judgment declaring that the defendant is not a holder of unsold shares of the plaintiff, appurtenant to certain cooperative apartments.

The parties in this case dispute whether the defendant is a holder of unsold shares of the plaintiff, appurtenant to several cooperative apartments. With respect to all but one of the cooperative apartments in contention, the issue was decided against the defendant by order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 20, 2004, in a prior action entitled *DeRaffele v 210-220-230 Owners’ Corp.,*commenced under index *789No. 14940/03, in Westchester County. Accordingly, with respect to all of the units except for the unit known as 210 Pelham Road, apartment 6M, the defendant is now barred by the doctrine of res judicata from pursuing his current contention that he is a holder of unsold shares appurtenant to the subject apartments (see *Matter of Hodes v Axelrod,*70 NY2d 364 [1987]; *Gramatan Home Invs. Corp. v Lopez,*46 NY2d 481, 485 [1979]; *Fogel v Oelmann,*7 AD3d 485 [2004]; *CRK Contr. of Suffolk v Brown & Assoc.,*260 AD2d 530 [1999]; *Coliseum Towers Assoc, v County of Nassau,*217 AD2d 387 [1996]).

Although the doctrine of res judicata does not bar the defendant’s contention in this litigation that he is a holder of unsold shares appurtenant to 210 Pelham Road, apartment 6M, we conclude that the plaintiff made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see *Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]). In opposition, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either not properly before this Court or without merit.

Since this action, in part, seeks a declaratory judgment, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for the entry of a judgment declaring that the defendant is not a holder of unsold shares of the plaintiff, appurtenant to certain cooperative apartments (see *Lanza v Wagner,*11 NY2d 317 [1962], *appeal dismissed*371 US 74 [1962], *cert denied*371 US 901 [1962]). Miller, J.P, Ritter, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
1. Nelson Otero,

Bergen County Jail

SBI# 559844B is now confined in

2. Said individual will be required at United States District Court, before the Honorable Stanley R. Chesler, Friday, February 4, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. for an ARRAIGNMENT, in the above captioned case, in which heis a defendant and a Writ of Habeas Corpus should be issued for that purpose

DATED: January 31, 2011

Assistant United States Attorney Petitioner Michael H. Robertson

ORDER FOR WRIT: Let the Writ Issue.

DATED 12J1

/ HONOEABLE Stanley R Chesler

UNITED STATES Distict JUDGE

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS: The United States of America to

WARDEN, BERGEN COUNTY JAIL

WE COMMAND YOU, that you have the body of Nelson Otero, now confined in Bergen County Jail brought to the United States District Court before the Honorable Stanley R, Chesler in Newark, New Jersey on Friday, February 4th, 2011 at 10:00 am, for an Arraignment, in the above-captioned matter. Immediately on completion of the proceedings, defendant will be returned to said place of confinement in safe and secure conduct.

WITNESS the Honorable Stanley R.. Chesler

United States District Judge at Newark, N.J

WILLIAM T. WALSHClerk of the U.S. District Court

- for the District of New Jersey

Per: •--‘ ‘ k-i 1f

Deputy Clerk

DATED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-70,476]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on May 22, 2009, in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Rockford Corporation, Walker, Michigan.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

      ( print page 31981)    
Signed at Washington, DC this 22nd day of June 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-15750 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1603]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Federal Open Market Committee; Domestic Policy Directive of 
December 15 and 16, 2008

    In accordance with Sec.  271.25 of its rules regarding availability 
of information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below the domestic 
policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market Committee at its 
meeting held on December 15 and 16, 2008.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\[thinsp]Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market 
Committee at its meeting held on December 15 and 16, 2008, which 
includes the domestic policy directive issued at the meeting, are 
available upon request to the Board of Governors of the Federal 
Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551. The minutes are published in 
the Federal Reserve Bulletin and in the Board's annual report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial 
conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable 
growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee 
seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds 
trading in a range of 0 to \1/4\ percent. The Committee directs the 
Desk to purchase GSE debt and agency-guaranteed MBS during the 
intermeeting period with the aim of providing support to the mortgage 
and housing markets. The timing and pace of these purchases should 
depend on conditions in the markets for such securities and on a 
broader assessment of conditions in primary mortgage markets and the 
housing sector. By the end of the second quarter of next year, the Desk 
is expected to purchase up to $100 billion in housing-related GSE debt 
and up to $500 billion in agency-guaranteed MBS. The System Open Market 
Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of 
ongoing developments regarding the System's balance sheet that could 
affect the attainment over time of the Committee's objectives of 
maximum employment and price stability.

    By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, January 14, 2009.
Brian F. Madigan,
Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.
[FR Doc. E9-1603 Filed 1-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darryl Morris, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 922]

by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Guzman, J), dated February 24, 2005, which designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court’s determination designating the defendant a level three sex offender is supported by clear and convincing evidence *(see*Correction Law § 168-n [3]) and, therefore, should not be disturbed on appeal *(see People v O’Neal,*26 AD3d 365 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 702 [2006]; *People v Baylor,*19 AD3d 467 [2005]; *People v Smith,*5 AD3d 752 [2004]; *People v Stokes,*5 AD3d 651 [2004]; *People v Cureton,*299 AD2d 532 [2002]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review *(see People v Barber,*29 AD3d 660 [2006]; *People v Burgess,*6 AD3d 686 [2004]; *People v Angelo,*3 AD3d 482 [2004]; *People v Cureton, supra),*or are based on matter dehors the record *(see People v Gliatta,*27 AD3d 441 [2006]). Adams, J.E, Krausman, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Robert G. Costantini, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ORBCOMM Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: November 14, 2007         /s/ Robert G. Costantini   Name:  Robert G. Costantini                                                   Title:  Executive Vice President and
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Jackie L. ReedJackie L. ReedPresident and CEODate: November 13, 2006/s/ Teresa L. MartinTeresa L. MartinCFODate: November 13, 2006
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 131135 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Justices 

### Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 131135 COA: 258196 Wayne CC: 04-004766-01 DAJUAN MARUICE LOVE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0821 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 29, 2006

Clerk
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 151 Filed 02/21/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 2953
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 151 Filed 02/21/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2954
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Thomas M. Duff, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Wellman, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposesin accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date            March 15, 2007By: /s/ Thomas M. Duff
Exhibit 10.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


To the Stockholders and Directors of
Advantage America, Inc.

We  hereby  consent  to  the  use  in the Prospectus constituting a part of this
Amendment  No. 1 to Form 10-SB Registration Statement of our report dated August
16,  2001  relating  to the financial statements of Advantage America, Inc., for
the  year  ended  June  30,  2001.

/s/ Sprayberry, Barnes, Marietta & Luttrell

Sprayberry, Barnes, Marietta & Luttrell
Bakersfield, California
December 21, 2001


<PAGE>