alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
```

```
 
```

```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
```

```
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
```

```
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
```

```
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
```

```
 
```

```
In connection with the Quarterly Report of June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
```

```
 
```

```
(1)           The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
```

```
 
```

```
(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
```

```
 
```

```
 
```

```
 
```

```
Dated:  August  19, 2008                                                                   By: /s/ MICHAEL MCCHESNEY 
```

```
                                                                                                               
```

```
                                                                                                                MICHAEL MCCHESNEY
```

                                                                                   Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 127 (Monday, July 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15744]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,875]


Eastern Display, a Division of Art Guild, Inc., Providence, RI; 
Notice of Termination of Investigation

    In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended, an investigation was initiated on May 1, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Eastern 
Display, a Division of Art Guild, Inc., Providence, Rhode Island.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 9th day of June 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-15744 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONBY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Pinnacle Gas Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending March 31,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Ronald T. Barnes, Senior Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and Secretary of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  May 14,2009

 
|   | /s/ Ronald T. Barnes                   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Ronald T. Barnes                       |
|   | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial |
|   | Officer and Secretary                  |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby  given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential  trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals  associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel; Child Conflicts Review.                    

*Date:*                         July 29, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         11 a.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health,  Neuroscience Center,  6001 Executive Boulevard,  Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Enid Light, PhD,  Scientific Review Officer,  Division of Extramural Activities,  National Institute of Mental Health, NIH,  Neuroscience Center,  6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 6132, MSC 9608,  Bethesda, MD 20852-9608,  301-443-0322,                         *elight@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 1, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-16209 Filed 7-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
v. Nag. No. 11-4022

?NDRZW ADERNHEIMER ORDER POR CONTINUJNCX

This matter having come before the Court on the joint

application of Paul J. Pishman, United States Attorney for the

District of New Jersey (Lee Vartan and Zacth Intrater, Assistant

U.S. Attorneys, appearing), and defendant 2ndrew Auernheimer

(Candace Hem, Esq., appearing), for an order granting a

continuance of the proceedings in the above-captioned matter topermit defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for

effective preparation in tbi matter and to allow the parties to

conduct plea negotiations and attempt to finalize a plea

gre, and the defendant being aware that the defendant has

the right to have the matter submitted to a grand jury within

thirty days of the date of the defendant’s arrest, pursuant to

Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161 (b), and the defendant

having consented to the continuance and waived such right, and

for good cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OP THIS COURT that this action should

be continued for the following reasons;

(1) The charges in this case are the result of a

lengthy investigation, and the discovery involves highly
permitted a reasonable amount of additional time for effective

preparation in this matter;

(3) Defendant Auernheimer has yet to make his initial

appearance in New Jersey, and defense counsel in New Jersey

requires additional time to consult with her client;

(4) As a result of the foregoing, pursuant to Title

18, United States Code, Section 3161(h) (7). the ends of justice

served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interest of

the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

I 1 IT IS, therefore, on this day of January, 2011,

ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, continued

for a period from the date of this Order through March 31, 2011;

and it is further

-2-
CzR-. C. C—

HON. CLAIRE C. CECCH!

United States Magistrate Judge

Foxm and entry

consen d to:

Z chflatrater

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Candace Horn

Counsel for defendant andrew Auerrihejmer

-3—
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Hon. Katharine S. Hayden
Vv. : Criminal No. 10-835 (KSH)
RICKY BOYD : ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on the Motion of Defendant
Ricky Boyd to Suppress Evidence, and the Court having presided over the
suppression hearing conducted on defendant Boyd's motion on September 19, 2011
and consistent with the Court’s opinion that was delivered orally to the
parties on October 4, 2011, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendant Boyd’s Motion to Suppress is hereby DENIED for the
reasons stated by the Court on October 4, 2011; and

2. Pretrial conference in this matter is scheduled for November
18, 2011 at 3:00 p.m.. Jury selection will begin on November 21, 2011 at 9:00

a.m. Trial in this matter will begin on November 28, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.

KATHARINE S. HAYDEN
e

United States District Judge

Dated: October 24, 2011
CMF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0648

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ANDREW PIERCE LAKE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including May 29, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 27 2021

04/27/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0648
#### WARDREP v. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO. (two cases).

Nos. 251, 252.

District Court, E. D. Tennessee.

Feb. 22, 1940.

Ray H. Jenkins, of Knoxville, Tenn., for plaintiff.

Mitchell Long, of Knoxville, Tenn., for defendant.

TAYLOR, District Judge.

These cases originated in the Chancery Court for Knox County, and were removed to this court by the defendant. After removal the defendant moved the court to strike the cases from the jury docket on the ground that trial by jury was waived by reason of failure of the plaintiff to make and serve demand therefor, as provided by Rule 38. Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, provides for a preservation of the right of jury trial as declared by the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution, U.S.C.A., or as given by United States statute, and specifies the circumstances under which the right may be deemed waived.

Under Rule 38(b) it is provided: “Any party may demand a trial by jury of any issue triable of right by a jury by serving upon the other parties a demand therefor in writing at any time after the commencement of the action and not later than 10 *176days after the service of the last pleading directed to such issue. Such demand may be indorsed upon a pleading of the party.”

Clause (c) provides for the inclusion of the trial of other issues than those for which request has been served by the adverse party.

Clause (d) provides: “The failure of a party to serve a demand as required by this rule and to file it as required by Rule 5(d) constitutes a waiver by him of trial by jury. A demand for trial by jury made as herein provided may not be withdrawn without the consent of the parties”.

Clause (d) of Rule 5, referred to, provides: “All papers after the complaint required to be served upon a party shall be filed with the court either before service or within a reasonable time thereafter”.

The general law in respect of waivers, admitting the literal construction sought by the defendant, negatives the idea, since in the original pleadings filed in the State court the plaintiffs expressly demanded a jury.

In cases removed from the State court in which the pleadings were so framed as to entitle a plaintiff to a jury trial, the. plaintiff is not again required within ten days after the last pleading directed to such issue or at any time to again make the demand.

Where the pleadings in the State court expressly demand a jury to try the issues, and there is no express waiver of the right so demanded, the new rules do not require another demand in the court to which the proceeding is removed.

The motions to strike the cause from the jury calendar will therefore be denied.
#### Hoff and another *v.*Iron-Clad Manuf’g Co.

*(Circuit*Court. *S. D. New York.*

April 27, 1887.)

Patents for Inventions—Infringement—Coat,-Hons.

The first claim of letters patent granted June 19, 1883, to Charles Hoff, for “1he method of forming the body of a coal-hod, or other similar vessel, which consists, substantially as before set forth, in first forming a cone-shaped body from a suitable blank, then folding in the cone-end of said body in crimps to form the bottom,” if not void for want of novelty, having been anticipated by the letters patent ol' Great Britain, No. 3,578, of November 3,1873, granted to Haseltine, must be limited to a method consisting among other things in folding in the cone-end of the body to form the bottom of the vessels in a series of annular ribs or rings; and upon this construction of it the defendant does not infringe in forming a part of its coal-hod bottoms by folding in the sides and then closing the space between the ends with a cap; modifying, on rehearing, 27 Fed. Bep. 807.

In Equity. On rehearing. For original opinion see 27 Fed. Rep. 807.

After the original decision, the defendant obtained leave to amend its answer and an order for a rehearing on the ground of newly-discovered evidence, -which consisted chiefly of the letters patent of Great Britain, No. 3,578, of November 3, 1873.

*George J. Murray*and *A. v. Briesen,*for complainants.

*Ernest G. Webb*and *Frederic II. Betts,*for defendant.

Wallace, J.

In view of the English patent to Haseltine of November 8, 1873, which has been introduced by the defendant, since it was permitted to amend its answer and have a rehearing of the cause, the first claim of the complainants’ patent, if not void for want of novelty, can only he sustained by limiting it to one in which the method consists among other things in folding in the cone-end of the body to form the bottom of the vessel in a series of annular ribs or rings. It is doubtful whether the claim is capable of this interpretation. If it is' not, the Haseltine patent anticipates it, because that patent clearly describes the method as applied to cylindrical vessels made of any suitable material. The method is the samo whether applied to a cylindrically shaped body or a tapering or cone-shaped body. Without deciding that novelty is negatived, it suffices that upon the narrowed construction which it must receive in order to save it, the defendant does not infringe.

The bill is dismissed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       6,986,984
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,070,242
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    769,218
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            75,873,115
<PP&E>                                      79,144,884
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,405,748
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             145,595,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      189,374,349
<BONDS>                                        349,801
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 26,439,760
<COMMON>                                        62,004
<OTHER-SE>                               (122,063,224)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               145,595,870
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           131,066,749
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               76,350,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            39,462,461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          22,157,361
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,418,963
<INCOME-TAX>                              (11,828,570)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         13,247,533
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,876,270
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                15,123,803
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.88


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.34

 

Description of Director and Executive Compensation Arrangements

 

A.                        Non-Employee Director Compensation.

 

Annual Retainer for Service on the Board:

 

·                  $60,000 payable in quarterly installments.

 

·                  Shares of restricted stock equal to $75,000 based upon the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of the grant. Restricted stock is granted in March of each year and vests over three years.

 

Annual Retainer for Chairman of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating & Corporate Governance Committees - $25,000.

 

Annual Committee Membership Fees - $12,500 for each Committee (non-chair members).

 

Each grant of restricted stock is made pursuant to the Company’s 2003 Equity Incentive Plan.  In addition, the Director Phantom Stock Plan offers non-employee directors the opportunity to defer cash compensation for up to three years and to receive that compensation (to the extent that it is actually earned by service during that period) in shares of common stock rather than in cash after termination of service or a predetermined period. Such compensation includes the annual retainer, committee chair and committee membership fees.

 











 

B.                        Executive Officers.

 

The base salaries for the Company’s current executive officers who were named executive officers in the Company’s Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 19, 2012 are as follows:

 

	
Arthur M. Coppola, Chairman of the Board and Chief   Executive Officer
    	
 
    	
$
    	
950,000
    	
 
    
	
Edward C. Coppola, President
    	
 
    	
$
    	
800,000
    	
 
    
	
Thomas E. O’Hern, Senior Executive Vice President,   Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
    	
 
    	
$
    	
550,000
    	
 
    
	
Randy L. Brant, Executive Vice President, Real   Estate
    	
 
    	
$
    	
500,000
    	
 
    


 

The Company has an annual incentive compensation program for our executive officers under which bonuses, which may be in the form of cash and/or equity awards, are granted to reflect corporate and individual performance during the prior calendar year. The actual bonus amounts granted are determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion based on its assessment of corporate and individual performance for each executive officer.

 

The Company also has a long-term incentive plan for its executive officers consisting of LTIP Units. LTIP Units vest based on the percentile ranking of our total stockholder return per share of common stock for the performance period relative to the REITs of the NAREIT Equity REITs Index, as measured at the end of the performance period.
Prison.

2.VINCENT YOUNG, SBI#: 883348B will be required at the United States Court House in Newark, New Jersey before the Hon. Stanley R. Chesler, U.S. District Judge, on Thursday, June 9, 2011, at 10:30 am, for a defendant meeting, in the above-captioned case. A Writ of Habeas Corpus should be issued for that purpose.

ORDER

Let the Writ Issue.

DATED:([)/

Hon. Stanley R. Chesler, U.S.D.J.

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

The United States of America to Warden of New Jersey State Prison WE COMMAND YOU that you have the body of

VINCENT YOUNG. 0 SBI#:883348B

now confined at the New Jersey State Prison, brought before the United States District Court, before the Hon. Stanley R. Chesler, U.S. District Judge, on Thursday, June 9, 2011, at 10:30 am, for a defendant meeting

WITNESS the jcStanIeR.CjesIer United States District JudgeNewark, New Jersey.

DATED

f- WILLIAM T. WALSH

Clerk of the U.S. District Court

for the District of New JerseyPer

Deputy Clerk

DATED: May 25, 2011

Newark, NJ

•14 ñ.

/(IfZ&ti-r

Melissa Jamj/Assistant U.S. Attorney Petitioner
O pinion filed June 11 , 201 5



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

____ _ ______


### No. 11

- 15

- 00 113

- C R

_____ __ ____



### KIRSTEN T. LEWIS , Appellan t

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 118th District Court Howard County, Texas Trial Court Cause No

. 14035

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Kirsten T. Lewis

, Appellant, has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal . In the
motion, Appellant requests that this court withdraw her notice of appeal and “dismiss
this appeal.” The motion is si gned by both Appellant and h er counsel in accordance

with T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4 2.2

. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

June 11 , 2015 PER CURIAM
Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J

. , and Bailey, J.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0429

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JOSHUA CHARLES PERRAS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 16, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 10 2024

01/10/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0429