alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2269

In Re: A. H. ROBINS COMPANY, INCORPORATED,

Debtor.

_________________________

GLENNA KIDD,

Claimant - Appellant,

versus

DALKON SHIELD CLAIMANTS TRUST,

Trust - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District

Judge; Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge; Blackwell N.

Shelley, Bankruptcy Judge. (CA-85-1307-R)

Submitted: January 26, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Glenna Kidd, Appellant Pro Se. Orran Lee Brown, Sr., DALKON SHIELD

CLAIMANTS TRUST, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Under § 8.04 of the Debtor’s Sixth Amended and Restated

Plan of Reorganization, Kidd was already subject to such an

injunction.

2

PER CURIAM:

Glenna Kidd appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for relief from stay, ordering her to pay $2105 in previously

imposed sanctions, and permanently enjoining her from filing further actions pertaining to the Dalkon Shield or her Dalkon Shield

claim.* We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See In re A. H. Robins Co.

(Kidd v. Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust), No. CA-85-1307-R (E.D. Va.

July 24, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6294

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SHAWN SADLER, a/k/a Tangulifu M. Barber, a/k/a Carlos Watts,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior 

District Judge. (3:04-cr-00330-CMC-5)

Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: July 27, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shawn Sadler, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Nancy Chastain Wicker, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Sadler appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion and supplemental motion for return of property. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States 

v. Sadler, No. 3:04-cr-00330-CMC-5 (D.S.C. Jan. 21, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
7e) 

Douglas 

, J. , J. 

the appeal is untimely. Because the notice of appeal was not timely filed, 

we lack jurisdiction and we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.' 

J. parragi 6 atEn 

cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge 

Clark County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

Raymond Jackson 

'The clerk of this court shall return, unfiled, the pro se documents 

received on June 19, 2015, and July 14, 2015. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1050 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to increase the ability 

of a State to administer a permit program under that Act, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 4, 2019 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. CRUZ, Ms. MURKOWSKI, and 

Mrs. FISCHER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to increase the ability of a State to administer a permit 

program under that Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STATE ADMINISTRATION OF CERTAIN PERMITS 

4 UNDER FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CON5 TROL ACT. 

6 Section 404(g) of the Federal Water Pollution Con7 trol Act (33 U.S.C. 1344(g)) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1050 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (1), in the second sentence, by 

2 striking ‘‘In addition, such State’’ and inserting the 

3 following: 

4 ‘‘(B) REQUIREMENT.—In submitting a 

5 proposal to the Administrator under subpara6 graph (A), the State’’; 

7 (2) by striking the subsection designation and 

8 all that follows through ‘‘The Governor’’ in the first 

9 sentence of paragraph (1) and inserting the fol10 lowing: 

11 ‘‘(g) STATE ADMINISTRATION.— 

12 ‘‘(1) STATE PERMIT PROGRAM.— 

13 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Governor’’; and 

14 (3) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the 

15 following: 

16 ‘‘(C) APPLICATIONS BY CERTAIN STATE

17 DEPARTMENTS OF TRANSPORTATION.— 

18 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—A State depart19 ment of transportation that has assumed 

20 the responsibilities of the Secretary of 

21 Transportation under the National Envi22 ronmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 

23 4321 et seq.) under the surface transpor24 tation project delivery program under sec25 tion 327 of title 23, United States Code, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1050 IS

1 may apply to the Administrator to admin2 ister an individual and general permit pro3 gram under subparagraph (A) with respect 

4 to highway projects subject to that as5 sumption of responsibility. 

6 ‘‘(ii) TREATMENT.—For the purpose 

7 of this subsection, a reference to a State 

8 shall be deemed to include a State depart9 ment of transportation described in clause 

10 (i).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 969 

Recognizing ‘‘National Public Works Week’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2020 

Ms. CRAIG (for herself, Mr. FITZPATRICK, and Ms. TITUS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing ‘‘National Public Works Week’’. 

Whereas public works professionals focus on infrastructure, 

facilities, and services that are of vital importance to sustainable and resilient communities and to the public 

health, high quality of life, and well-being of the United 

States of America; 

Whereas such infrastructure, facilities, and services could not 

be provided without the dedicated efforts of public works 

professionals, who are engineers, managers, and employees of Federal, State, and local government and the private sector, and who are responsible for rebuilding, improving, and protecting our Nation’s transportation, 

water supply, water treatment and solid waste systems, 

public buildings, and other structures and facilities essential for our citizens; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 969 IH 

Whereas public works professionals have continued to provide 

these essential services during the ongoing COVID–19 

pandemic, placing themselves at increased risk of infection; 

Whereas it is in the public interest for citizens, civic leaders, 

and children of the United States to gain knowledge of, 

and to maintain a progressive interest and understanding 

of, the importance of public works and public works programs in their respective communities; and 

Whereas the week of May 17 through May 23, 2020, marks 

the 60th annual ‘‘National Public Works Week’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 ‘‘National Public Works Week’’ and encourages the people 

3 of the United States to pay tribute to our public works 

4 professionals, engineers, managers, and employees and to 

5 recognize the substantial contributions they make to pro6 tecting our national health, safety, and quality of life. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metals USA Holdings Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
(the Periodic Report), I, Robert C. McPherson, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. To my knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                           
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 3, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    ROBERT C. MCPHERSON,
III                                           
|                        |  |  |  | Robert C. McPherson, III Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# covid_table37_c47_naics
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JODI A. SMITH, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3288

)

LAKEWOOD RANCH GYMNASTICS, )

LLC, a Florida limited liability company; )

LAURA PARRAGA; and DAVIDPARRAGA, )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed June 20, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee 

County; Gilbert A. Smith, Jr., Judge.

David W. Smith of Law Office of David W. 

Smith, Sarasota, for Appellant.

Karen Cox of Bush Ross, P.A., Tampa, for 

Appellees. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit 

Nos. 13-2113 

 13-2118 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Appellee, 

v. 

JOSÉ LÓPEZ-DÍAZ; CARLOS LÓPEZ-DÍAZ, 

Defendants, Appellants. 

 

ERRATA SHEET 

 The opinion of this Court issued on July 13, 2015, is amended 

as follows: 

 On the cover page, "John H. Cuhna, Jr." is replaced with "John 

H. Cunha, Jr." 

 On the cover page, "Cuhna & Holcomb, P.C." is replaced with 

"Cunha & Holcomb, P.C."
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 16, 2019

No. 04-19-00007-CV

IN RE Candace HARDIN

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On January 4, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the 

petition, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition 

for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

It is so ORDERED on January 16, 2019.

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of January, 2019.

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016CI20115, styled Candace Denman v. Derrick Denman, pending in the 

150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Renée Yanta presiding.
H. Res. 693 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 14, 2019. 

Resolved, That, pursuant to regulations issued by the 

Committee on House Administration— 

(1) the Director of the Office of Diversity and Inclusion established under section 104(d) of House Resolution 6 may appoint and fix the pay of employees of the 

Office; and 

(2) the Director of the Office of the Whistleblower 

Ombudsman established under section 104(e) of House 

Resolution 6 may appoint and fix the pay of employees 

of the Office. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
(More)

No. 18-5 For Immediate Release

May 2018

RRB Will Mail New Medicare Cards

The U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) will send new Medicare cards to its beneficiaries in 

the coming weeks. The primary benefit of the new cards is that it makes identity theft much less 

likely, since they will no longer include the beneficiary’s social security number.

This initiative results from the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015, which 

required the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to develop a new card that does 

not contain an individual’s social security number. By improperly obtaining someone’s social 

security number, a dishonest individual can more easily commit acts of fraud and identity theft in 

the beneficiary’s name.

Instead, the new Medicare cards will contain a Medicare number. This will be a randomly 

assigned 11-digit combination of numbers and upper-case letters. In addition, the new cards will no 

longer indicate the beneficiary’s gender.

At the time they receive their new Medicare card, people will be instructed to safely and 

securely destroy their old Medicare card, and to keep their new Medicare number confidential. The 

new card and number will not affect Medicare benefits, and CMS has been working with medical 

providers to ensure a smooth transition to this new system.

The one exception involves people enrolled in a Medicare Advantage Plan, also known as 

Medicare Part C. These individuals will continue to use their plan’s identification card for access to 

Medicare benefits, as these cards already have a unique identification number that is not the social 

security number.

The RRB will mail the new Medicare cards to about 450,000 beneficiaries in early June. CMS 

is also beginning to mail new cards to its much larger group of non-railroad beneficiaries that same 

month, but will stagger them over a 12-month period.

U.S. Railroad Retirement Board

RRB News

844 North Rush Street Chicago, Illinois 60611-1275

www.rrb.gov

877-772-5772 general information

Public Affairs

312-751-4777 

opa@rrb.gov media inquiries
-2-

If a railroad Medicare beneficiary has a lost or damaged Medicare card, they can request a new 

one by calling the RRB’s toll-free number (1-877-772-5772) or going to the Benefit Online 

Services section of the agency’s website at www.rrb.gov. They can also print out a new card at 

home by setting up an online account at www.mymedicare.gov. This feature will be available after 

their new card has been mailed. 

If people have questions or need additional information about this initiative, they can access a 

web page developed by CMS on the subject at www.cms.gov/newcard.

Note: A sample of the new Medicare card can be accessed at this link.

# # #

An independent Federal agency based in Chicago, the RRB pays almost $12.6 billion a year 

in benefits under the Federal Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts 

covering the nation’s railroad workers and their families.
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: May 12, 2016 517189 

________________________________

In the Matter of FREDDIE 

JACKSON,

Appellant,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ADMINISTRATION OF BARE HILL

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

et al.,

Respondents.

________________________________

Calendar Date: March 29, 2016

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Clark and Aarons, JJ.

__________

Freddie Jackson, Malone, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Laura

Etlinger of counsel), for respondents.

__________

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McDonough,

J.), entered July 10, 2013 in Albany County, which, in a

proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents'

motion to dismiss the petition.

Petitioner, an inmate, filed a grievance with the Inmate

Grievance Resolution Committee challenging his removal from the

facility mess hall work program. The Committee denied the

grievance, as did the facility Superintendent on appeal. 

Subsequently, petitioner submitted a letter to respondent

Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision seeking

reinstatement to the mess hall program. Petitioner did not,

however, appeal the denial of his grievance to the Central Office

Review Committee (hereinafter CORC). He thereafter commenced
-2- 517189 

this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the disposition of

his grievance. Supreme Court granted respondents' motion to

dismiss the petition based upon petitioner's failure to exhaust

administrative remedies, and he now appeals.

We affirm. Petitioner's removal from the program was the

proper subject of the inmate grievance procedure, requiring that

he follow the protocol of the administrative appeal procedure by

appealing the Superintendent's denial to CORC (see 7 NYCRR 701.3;

701.5; Matter of Fulton v Reynolds, 83 AD3d 1308, 1308-1309

[2011]). Inasmuch as petitioner failed to appeal to CORC,

Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition for failure to

exhaust administrative remedies (see Matter of Fulton v Reynolds,

83 AD3d at 1308-1309; Matter of Fernandez v Goord, 53 AD3d 961,

961-962 [2008]).

McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Clark and Aarons, JJ.,

concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Susser Holdings Corporation (the Company) for the three months ended June 29,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sam L. Susser, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                             |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 8, 2008 |  | SUSSER HOLDINGS CORPORATION
|                     |  |                            
|                     |  | By                          |  | /s/ Sam L. Susser                    
|                     |  |                             |  | Sam L. Susser                        
|                     |  |                             |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael G. Archbold, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Date: November 12, 2009



|    |  |                                            
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Michael G. Archbold                    
|    |  | Michael G. Archbold                        
|    |  | Chief Financial and Chief Operating Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Corrado De Gasperis, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Novamerican Steel Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the condensed consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being            prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s registered public accounting firm and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: July 15, 2008

 

 

| /s/ Corrado De Gasperis         |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| *Corrado De Gasperis*           |   |
| *(Principal Financial Officer)* |   |