alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 13 / Thursday, January 22, 2009 / Presidential Documents 4097 

Executive Order 13487 of January 16, 2009 

Establishment of a Temporary Organization To Facilitate 

United States Government Support for Afghanistan 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 202 of the Revised 

Statutes (22 U.S.C. 2656) and section 3161 of title 5, United States Code, 

it is hereby ordered as follows: 

Section 1. Establishment. There is established within the Department of 

State, in accordance with section 3161 of title 5, United States Code, a 

temporary organization to be known as the Afghanistan Support Office (ASO). 

Sec. 2. Purpose of the Temporary Organization. The purpose of the ASO 

shall be to perform the specific project of supporting executive departments 

and agencies in preventing Afghanistan from becoming a safe haven for 

terrorists, facilitating Afghanistan’s progress to self-sufficiency, and maintaining an effective diplomatic presence in Afghanistan. 

Sec. 3. Functions of the Temporary Organization. In carrying out its purpose 

set forth in section 2, the ASO shall: 

(a) support executive departments and agencies in building the civilian 

capabilities of the Government of Afghanistan, including expansion of central 

services by the Government of Afghanistan, development of a thriving private 

sector economy, and improvement in the governance of Afghanistan’s territory and borders; and 

(b) perform such other functions related to the specific project set forth 

in section 2 as the Secretary of State (Secretary) may assign. 

Sec. 4. Personnel and Administration. The ASO shall be headed by a Director 

selected by the Secretary. The ASO shall be jointly based in Washington, 

D.C., and Afghanistan, and the Secretary of State shall seek accreditation 

of employees as members of the United States Embassy Kabul as necessary. 

Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) This order shall be implemented in accordance 

with applicable law, subject to the availability of appropriations, and consistent with presidential guidance. 

(b) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, 

substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, by any party 

against the United States, its agencies, instrumentalities, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS-1
4098 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 13 / Thursday, January 22, 2009 / Presidential Documents 

(c) The ASO shall terminate at the end of the maximum period permitted 

by section 3161(a)(1) of title 5, United States Code, unless sooner terminated 

by the Secretary. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

January 16, 2009 

[FR Doc. E9–1538 

Filed 1–21–09; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3195–W9–P 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS-1GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
# Result 17.2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-10266

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cv-00191-BAE-GRS

FCCI INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MCLENDON ENTERPRISES, INC.,

BROOKS LAMAR MITCHELL,

Defendants - Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

________________________

(July 27, 2015)

Case: 14-10266 Date Filed: 07/27/2015 Page: 1 of 3 
2

Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

This case arises from an automobile collision between a vehicle driven by 

Brooks Lamar Mitchell in his capacity as an employee of McLendon Enterprises, 

Inc. (McLendon), and an Evans County school bus. The district court, applying 

Georgia law, determined that Mitchell could recover under McLendon’s policy 

with FCCI Insurance Co., which promised to pay sums he was “legally entitled to 

recover” from an uninsured motorist. The district court found that Mitchell could 

make a claim under this provision even though Evans County’s partial sovereign 

immunity prevented Mitchell from establishing in a lawsuit that he was legally 

entitled to recover the full amount of his damages from Evans County. 

In the first panel decision in this case, we certified the following question to 

the Georgia Supreme Court:

Can an insured party recover under an uninsured-motorist insurance 

policy providing that the insurer will pay sums “the insured is legally 

entitled to recover as compensatory damages from the owner or driver 

of an uninsured motor vehicle” despite the partial sovereign immunity 

of the tortfeastor?

FCCI Ins. Co. v. McLendon Enters., Inc., 573 F. App’x 919, 921 (11th Cir. 2014).

The Georgia Supreme Court answered the question in the affirmative. FCCI 

Ins. Co. v. McLendon Enters., Inc., __ S.E.2d __, 2015 WL 2166731 (Ga. May 11, 

2015). Given the Georgia Supreme Court’s resolution of the certified issue, the 

Case: 14-10266 Date Filed: 07/27/2015 Page: 2 of 3 
3

district court did not err in determining Mitchell could recover under McLendon’s 

uninsured-motorist coverage despite Evans County’s partial sovereign immunity 

and Mitchell’s inability to establish its full liability to him. Accordingly, we affirm 

the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Mitchell.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 14-10266 Date Filed: 07/27/2015 Page: 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 130 (Thursday, July 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32891-32892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16288]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[University of Chicago, et al.]


Notice of Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of 
Scientific Instruments

This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, as amended by Pub. .106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). 
Related records can be viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 
3705, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14\th\ and Constitution Ave, NW, 
Washington, D.C.
Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of no instruments 
of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments described 
below, for such purposes as this is intended to be used, that was being 
manufactured in the United States at the time of its order.
    Docket Number: 09-021. Applicant: University of Chicago, Argonne, 
Lemont, IL 60439. Instrument: Isolation Transformer. Manufacturer: Guth 
GmbH, Germany. Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 27017, June 5, 2009. 
Reasons: A unique feature of this instrument is that it is capable of 
providing 110kVA AC power to an injector platform, and will operate at 
a positive voltage of up to 250kVDC at continuous operation. No 
domestic sources make devices with similar capabilities.
    Docket Number: 09-028. Applicant: University of Texas at Austin, 
Austin, TX 78722. Instrument: Synchroslice. Manufacturer: Lohmann 
Research Products, Germany. Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 27017, 
June 5, 2009. Reasons: This instrument is capable of performing serial 
section transmission electron microscopy, which is required in order to 
analyze the detailed structural changes involved. No domestic sources 
make devices with similar capabilities.
    Docket Number: 09-035. Applicant: University of Minnesota Medical 
School, Minneapolis, MN 55455. Instrument: Muscle Research System. 
Manufacturer: Scientific Instruments, Germany. Intended Use: See notice 
at 74 FR 27017, June 5, 2009. Reasons: A unique feature of this 
instrument is that it requires a gradient maker and pump control in 
order to simultaneously measure the istometric force of skinned muscle 
fibers as a function of calcium concentration. Further, a laser system 
is needed to excite fluophores in order to simultaneously measure the 
force and measure the myosin ATPase. No

[[Page 32892]]

domestic sources make devices with the capability of making 
simultaneous measurements.

    Dated: July 1, 2009.
Christopher Cassel,
Acting Director Subsidies Enforcement Office Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-16288 Filed 7-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
The nonprofit business of promoting groupaffiliation and goals created about 363,000new jobs between 1979 and 1999. Employ-ment in membership organizations increasedfrom about 698,000 in 1979 to about1,061,000 in 1999. That 52-percent rate ofgrowth was faster than the 43-percentincrease in nonfarm employment over thesame 2-decade period.

As the chart shows, however, the range ofjob growth varied widely among types ofmembership organizations. By 1999, employ-ment in religious organizations had in-creased 177 percent—more than 21⁄2 timesits 1979 level. Job growth in professionalorganizations nearly doubled, with anincrease of 93 percent. Almost half the jobsin membership organizations were in civicand social associations, which showed a 60-percent increase in employment. Politicalorganizations—the group with the fewestjobs—had a 42-percent growth rate, closeto that for nonfarm employment. Member-ship organizations not elsewhere classified(39 percent of membership organizationemployment) and business associations (33percent) both were below average ingrowth, while labor organization employ-ment declined as union membership de-creased over the 2 decades.

48 Occupational Outlook Quarterly ● Summer 2001

(Percent change)

177

93

60

42 3933

-3Religiousorganizations

Professionalorganizations

Civic andsocialassociations

Politicalorganizations

Membershiporganizationsnot elsewhereclassified

Businessassociations

Labororganizations
----

----

| 1)           | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)           | the      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |
|----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  September      21, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Daniel      D. Correa                                                                                                                                   |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                     |   | Daniel      D. CorreaChief      Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and      Director(Principal      Executive Officer & Principal Financial Officer) |   |
1

NOT FOR PUBLICATION (Document Nos. 36, 38) 

 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CAMDEN VICINAGE

___________________________________

:

HAROLD LEONARD, :

: Civil No. 10-6625 (RBK/JS)

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : ORDER

:

:

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE :

TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE :

SERVICE :

:

Defendant. :

___________________________________ :

KUGLER, United States District Judge:

THIS MATTER coming before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary 

judgment (Doc. Nos. 36, 38), and the Court having considered the moving papers, and the 

responses thereto; and for the reasons expressed in the Opinion issued this date,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY 

FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.

Dated: 8/26/2013 /s/ Robert B. Kugler _ 

 ROBERT B. KUGLER

United States District Judge

Case 1:10-cv-06625-RBK-JS Document 40 Filed 08/26/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 425
|EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of RehabCare Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I John H. Short, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |    
| | ---
| | By:
| |    
| |    

|
|
(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Robert G. CostantiniRobert G. CostantiniExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,150
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,051
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          231,416
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,316
<OTHER-SE>                                   (158,147)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,585
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (229,445)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (89,423)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (140,022)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (229,445)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**
**WESTCORP**
CERTIFICATION OF CEO
In connection with the Annual Report of Westcorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the periodending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, to thebest of his knowledge and belief and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Chapter 63, Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
The foregoing Certification is furnished solely for purposes of complying with the provisions ofSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to be used for any other purpose.
**WESTCORP**   /s/ Ernest S. Rady  Ernest S. Rady  Chairman of the Board and  Chief Executive Officer       Date: March 11, 2005
EXHIBIT 31.3

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to

Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)
and 15d-14(a)

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

I, Christopher J. Schaber, certify
that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Soligenix, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2017; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|August 17, 2018 | /s/ Christopher J. Schaber           
|--------------- | -------------------------------------
|                | Christopher J. Schaber, Ph.D.        
|                | President and Chief Executive Officer
l) The defendant is charged ith an offense described in 18 U.S.C. 3142(f)(l) and has been convicted of a E federal offense state

or local offense that would have been a federal offense if a circumstance giving rise to federal jurisdiction had existed - that is

a crime of violence as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 31 56(a)(4).an offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death.

an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed in

Date

Part Il—Written Statement of Reasons for Detention

*

a felony that was committed after the defendant had been convicted of two or more prior federal offenses described in 18 U.S.C.

§ 3 142(f)(1 )(A)-(C), or comparable state or local offenses.

E (2) The offense described in finding (1) was committed while the defendant was on release pending trial for a federal, state or local offense.

fl (3) A period of not more than five years has elapsed since the date of conviction release of the defendant from imprisonment

for the offense described in finding (I).

(4) Findings Nos. (1), (2) and (3) establish a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the

safety of(an) other person(s) and the community. I further find that the defendant has not rebutted this presumption.

Alternative Findings (A)

(I) There is probable cause to believe that the defendant has committed an offense

for which a maximum term of imprisonment often years or more is prescribed inunder 18 U.S.C. * 924(e).

ü (2) The defendant has not rebutted the presumption established by finding I that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure

the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety of the community.

Alternative Findings (B)

(I) There is a serious risk that the defendant will not appear.(2) There is a serious risk that the defendant will endanger the safety of another person or the community.

I find that the credible testimony and information submitted at the hearing establishes by clear and convincing evidence 1 a prepon

derance of the evidence that

DEFENDANT CONSENTS TO DETENTION WITHOUT BAIL AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE PENDING TRIAL.

Part Ill—Directions Regarding Detention

The defendant is committed to the custody ofthe Attorney General or his designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate.

to the extent practicable. from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a

reasonable opportunity tbr private consultation with defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for theGovernment. the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance

in connection with a court proceeding.

lgnaluo ofjiidgc

CLAIRE C. CECCHI. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Name and Title at Judge

*Insert as applicable: (a) Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 801 c/eq.); (b) Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. § 951

cr seq.); or (c) Section 1 of Act of Sept. 15, 1980 (21 U.S.C. § 955a).
Exhibit 32.01





CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Michael Neufeld, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Pegasi Energy Resources Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Pegasi Energy Resources Corporation.





By:

/s/    MICHAEL NEUFELDDate: August 13, 2010

Name:

Michael NeufeldTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




I, Richard Lindermanis, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Pegasi Energy Resources Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Pegasi Energy Resources Corporation.





By:

/s/    RICHARD LINDERMANISDate: August 13, 2010

Name:

Richard LindermanisTitle:

Chief Financial Officer