alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 126 (Thursday, July 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15662]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-956-1420-BJ; Group No. 553, Minnesota]


Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior

ACTION: Notice of filing of plats of survey; Minnesota.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plats of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States office in 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston 
Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was requested by the Bureau of 
Land Management, Eastern States, Division of Lands and Renewable 
Resources, Milwaukee Field Office.
    The lands surveyed are:

Fourth Principal Meridian, Minnesota

    The plat of survey represents the survey of an island in Kabetogama 
Lake, designated Tract No. 37, Township 69 North, Range 20 West, of the 
Fourth Principal Meridian, in the State of Minnesota, and was accepted 
June 5, 2009.
    The plat of survey represents the survey of an island in Kabetogama 
Lake, designated Tract No. 37, Township 69 North, Range 21 West, of the 
Fourth Principal Meridian, in the State of Minnesota, and was accepted 
June 5, 2009.
    We will place copies of the plats we described in the open files. 
They will be available to the public as a matter of information.
    If BLM receives a protest against a survey, as shown on the plat, 
prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing 
pending our consideration of the protest.
    We will not officially file the plats until the day after we have 
accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, 
including decisions on appeals.

    Dated: June 23, 2009.
Dominica Van Koten,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. E9-15662 Filed 7-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
Brian T. Shaw, Esq. 

CONSUMER LITIGATION GROUP 

Law Office of Dimitrios Kolovos, LLC 

211 West State Street, Suite 204 

Media, PA 19063 

Tel 610-616-5303 

Fax 610-672-1944 

Eml BShaw@ConsumerLitigators.com 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

(NEWARK DIVISION) 

DAVID A. HRICZKO, 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 v. 

WORLDWIDE ASSET PURCHASING II, 

LLC, et al., 

 

 Defendants. 

DOCKET NO.: 2:10-CV-06377-PGS-ES 

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS TO 

ANY PARTY 

TO: CLERK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

The parties hereto having resolved their differences, please dismiss the above-captioned 

case with prejudice and without costs as to any party. 

BY: s/Brian T. Shaw 

Brian T. Shaw, Esquire 

LAW OFFICES OF DIMITRIOS KOLOVOS, LLC 

211 W. State Street, Suite 204 

Media, PA 19063 

Tel 610-616-5303 

Fax 610-672-1944 

Eml BShaw@ConsumerLitigators.com 

Case 2:10-cv-06377-PGS-ES Document 3 Filed 03/10/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 15
# table95_q12.1_state
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          75,411
<SECURITIES>                                       400
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,943
<PP&E>                                       3,011,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                 817,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,334,746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,633
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,188,160
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,334,746
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               330,282
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  142,699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                187,583
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            187,583
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   187,583
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
        

</TABLE>
Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG Document 206-8 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 3169
Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG Document 206-8 Filed 08/22/14 Page 2 of 15 PageID: 3170
Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG Document 206-8 Filed 08/22/14 Page 3 of 15 PageID: 3171
Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG Document 206-8 Filed 08/22/14 Page 4 of 15 PageID: 3172
Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG Document 206-8 Filed 08/22/14 Page 5 of 15 PageID: 3173
Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG Document 206-8 Filed 08/22/14 Page 6 of 15 PageID: 3174
Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG Document 206-8 Filed 08/22/14 Page 7 of 15 PageID: 3175
Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG Document 206-8 Filed 08/22/14 Page 8 of 15 PageID: 3176
Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG Document 206-8 Filed 08/22/14 Page 9 of 15 PageID: 3177
Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG Document 206-8 Filed 08/22/14 Page 10 of 15 PageID: 3178
Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG Document 206-8 Filed 08/22/14 Page 11 of 15 PageID: 3179
Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG Document 206-8 Filed 08/22/14 Page 12 of 15 PageID: 3180
Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG Document 206-8 Filed 08/22/14 Page 13 of 15 PageID: 3181
Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG Document 206-8 Filed 08/22/14 Page 14 of 15 PageID: 3182
Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG Document 206-8 Filed 08/22/14 Page 15 of 15 PageID: 3183
Mo. oi- M-oolod-ol

In The

Coon+ij o£ CrimiruU Appends

Avc<Mn} Ty.

BroMlcVi ft^MA. "Fren^

MS.

The SbJhi of "facets

From AppeoJi frb.flH4~flfa30-fig,

Tri^\ Owze, Ro . l3g*taTS

Harris £ouo-Ka, T<^

II

FILED IN

COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS

JUL 24 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk

Td *hL Honorable j\U0f6 t>{ +ta (joj^ of Criming (tf)QtA$ \

torses w\^ Bro^(^ RfrifiUfl Tr^cfo ,Peh'Wdr, An/ fibs +h&

Mofian -fty an fy\e/\$of\ of S\*fy £tcj) ^Uvjs ^ uhkh fe -fild. £L

P&KViO/l -ftf_bJiCfririorvAruv G^I/i^juO. in 4uppvf\ of -fhi<> IttoKon, Oppdterrf

dnvj ^t^sioo prior 4d +his n^st. ^

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUL 23 2015

Abe?Aeosta,Ctefk

Jf.

Prfrti^W, Pec Se.

Tb£r *:JQH23H

_£

22£5_Ehl32LL

8aum orft s-& *,. cn^nnf:
lorn&te l\f)S^ofn beckr/itiort

1/ftrotoruX- dm/Ala Vcp,^ Tt>r.\& 1442311

pnc^nh^ \(\(Mcexo^A a\ "thu^&ist Uoif oi The T-t&a^

hcparW\eA\D{ bw\rx&\ Jv&ite in ,k#/^r^ fo'^P

varvfy anA Decked- Unit/ p^iM4vj t>f (fcrjuru +hat fk^

-fbr^jpioj ^Ts^&a+s ar^ +rue ani florid-. btetvikcA en +fiK

T6Cj #: 1442311

bdr>A
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 760 

Commemorating the centennial of Houston Methodist Hospital. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2019 

Mr. GREEN of Texas (for himself, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mrs. FLETCHER, Mr. 

OLSON, Ms. GARCIA of Texas, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. 

BABIN, Mr. CRENSHAW, and Mr. BRADY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the centennial of Houston Methodist 

Hospital. 

Whereas Houston Methodist Hospital is a nonprofit health 

care institution that has been devoted to providing compassionate and exceptional health care in Houston, 

Texas, for 100 years; 

Whereas Houston Methodist Hospital opened its doors in 

1919 as an outreach ministry of the Methodist Episcopal 

Church, and has since saved countless lives through its 

mission of putting the patient’s physical, mental, and 

spiritual needs at the center of everything it does; 

Whereas Houston Methodist Hospital now stands as the flagship hospital of the Houston Methodist system serving 

the greater Houston community with 1.3 million patient 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 760 IH 

encounters in the last year across 8 hospitals with a robust network of primary and specialty care physicians 

and more than 23,000 employees; 

Whereas Houston Methodist Hospital has been a leader and 

incubator of innovation within medicine and continues to 

invest in the research and development of innovative 

medical breakthroughs, technologies, and ideas, such as 

the world’s first multiorgan transplant and the world’s 

first successful coronary bypass grafting using the patient’s own leg vein, among many others; 

Whereas Houston Methodist Hospital’s history of academic 

collaborations has empowered new generations of clinicians and researchers through creating medical education 

programs that are translational, interdisciplinary, and 

transformative; and 

Whereas Houston Methodist Hospital has consistently been 

acknowledged for its quality, safety, and excellence, including being ranked the number one hospital in the 

State of Texas for eight consecutive years and a national 

Honor Roll hospital by U.S. News and World Report, 

and has also been recognized for its outstanding specialties in neurology and neurosurgery, pulmonology, orthopedics, cancer, cardiology and heart surgery, urology, and 

many other medical specialties: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the 100th anniversary of Houston Methodist Hos3 pital’s founding, for its role as a pioneer and leader in 

4 medicine, and as a model in providing high-quality, costVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:41 Dec 11, 2019 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR760.IH HR760

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 760 IH 

1 effective health care for patients through an unwavering 

2 focus on safety, quality, service, and innovation. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
# table122_q14.2_state
Work during play: Jobs in spectator sports

employed there. Areas with the greatest such employment in 2007 included New York City and northern New 

Jersey, Los Angeles, Miami, Chicago, Charlotte, and 

Indianapolis. Sports teams are often located near cities 

or major metropolitan areas—so employment is concentrated near large cities throughout the country.

For more information about these and other industry 

employment data, visit the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages Web site at www.bls.gov/qcew. Or, 

write to the Division of Administrative Statistics and 

Labor Turnover, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2 Massachusetts Ave. NE., Rm. 4840, Washington, DC 20212; 

call (202) 691–6567. (To send an e-mail, go to www.bls.

gov/cew/cewcont.htm.)

For more data on the occupations in the spectator sports industry, visit the Occupational Employment 

Statistics Web site, www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_

711200.htm.

You don’t always have to be a competitor or a fan 

to be part of the game. In the spectator sports 

industry, for example, there are many more 

workers on the sidelines than on the field.

Spectator sports employment includes those who 

are part of live sporting events that take place in front 

of a paying audience. These events can be professional 

or amateur and include car, horse, or dog races. Ushers, 

lobby attendants, and ticket takers, as well as the athletes, trainers, and managers of sports teams and racetracks are among those who work in the industry. Other 

occupations with significant employment in the spectator sports industry include food preparation and service 

workers, landscaping and groundskeeping workers, and 

janitors and cleaners.

The chart shows metropolitan areas that had the 

most employment in spectator sports in 2007. The 

larger the circle, the more spectator sports workers were 

4,095–8,777

289–938 939–1,969

1,970–4,094

3–288

Spectator sports employment by metropolitan area, 2007 annual averages

44 Occupational Outlook Quarterly • Spring 2009
CHIEF JUSTICE

 CAROLYN WRIGHT

JUSTICES

 DAVID L. BRIDGES

 MOLLY FRANCIS

 DOUGLAS S. LANG

 ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

 ROBERT M. FILLMORE

 LANA MYERS

 DAVID EVANS

 DAVID LEWIS

 ADA BROWN

 CRAIG STODDART

 BILL WHITEHILL

 DAVID J. SCHENCK

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

600 COMMERCE STREET, SUITE 200

DALLAS, TEXAS 75202

(214) 712-3400

LISA MATZ

CLERK OF THE COURT

(214) 712-3450

lisa.matz@5th.txcourts.gov

GAYLE HUMPA

BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR

(214) 712-3434

gayle.humpa@5th.txcourts.gov

FACSIMILE

(214) 745-1083

INTERNET

HTTP://5TH.TXCOURTS.GOV

September 20, 2016

Dan E. Martens Collin Dean Kennedy

The Law Office of Dan E. Martens Hanshaw Kennedy, LLP

17101 Preston Rd, Suite 160 1415 Legacy Dr., Ste 350

Dallas, Texas 75248-1369 Frisco, TX 75034-1942

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 05-15-00906-CV

Trial Court Case Number: 219-04978-2014

Style: Altesse Healthecare Solutions, Inc. and Shawna Boudreaux

v. 

Allen Wilson and Becky Wilson

Dear Attorneys:

Enclosed is a corrected pg. 3 for the above-mentioned case. Please note the following typographical 

errors, which have been corrected.

1st paragraph, second line, omit the word “and” 

2nd paragraph, end quote added to 4th line.

Sincerely,

Lisa Matz

Clerk of The Court

cc: Trial court judge

Trial court clerk
S05Y0463.

#### IN THE MATTER OF KEVIN E. PERRY.

(607 SE2d 889)

Decided January 10, 2005.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, K. Gene Chapman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

Per curiam.

Kevin E. Perry, a resident of Dallas, Texas, has been a member of the State Bar of Georgia since 1985. In September 2001, the Commission for Lawyer Discipline of the State Bar of Texas disbarred Perry from the practice of law in Texas based on its conclusion in five disciplinary proceedings that Perry had violated the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct involving client communication, diligence (abandonment of a client matter), improper withdrawal from representation, safekeeping client property, and misconduct involving fraud and deception.

On April 29, 2004, the State Bar of Georgia filed a Formal Complaint against Perry seeking his disbarment from the State Bar of Georgia under Rule 9.4 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct which states in part that disbarment or suspension by another jurisdiction is a ground for discipline in the State of Georgia. Perry was personally served by a Texas constable and did not file an answer to the Formal Complaint. As a result of Perry’s failure to respond, the facts alleged were deemed admitted under Bar Rule 4-212 (a). The Special Master appointed by this Court concluded Perry violated Rule 9.4 and recommended Perry be disbarred from the practice of law in Georgia.

Based on our review of the record, we conclude Perry violated Rule 9.4 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct and that disbarment is the appropriate sanction for his conduct. Accordingly, the name of Kevin E. Perry hereby is removed from the rolls of persons entitled to practice law in Georgia. Perry is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Disbarred.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000447

05-JUN-2020

07:47 AM
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Maple Mountain Explorations Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Marvin Wosk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
9th day of March, 2007.


/s/ Marvin Wosk
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
*

  After examining the briefs and record, we have concluded that oral argument is

unnecessary.  Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record.  See FED. R. APP. P.

34(a)(2).

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois  60604

Submitted May 14, 2008*

Decided May 16, 2008

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

No. 07‐2851

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff‐Appellee,

v.

STEVEN M. WEBER

Defendant‐Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

No. 06‐CR‐261

Charles N. Clevert, Jr.

Judge.

O R D E R

Steven Weber pleaded guilty to a single count of wire fraud.  See 18 U.S.C. § 1343.

The district court sentenced him to 36 months’ imprisonment and 5 years’ supervised

release, and ordered him to pay $178,464 in restitution.  The court directed Weber to pay at

least $200 per month while on supervised release but set no payment schedule for his term

of imprisonment.  The court also ordered Weber to participate in the Inmate Financial

Responsibility Program.

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 07‐2851 Page 2

On appeal Weber argues only that the district court committed plain error by failing

to set a restitution payment schedule for his period of incarceration.  Weber filed his brief

before we decided United States v. Sawyer, Nos. 06‐1275, 06‐1614 & 06‐4030, 2008 WL 942653,

at *1 (7th Cir. Apr. 9, 2008).  In that decision we held that if a defendant cannot pay

immediately the sentencing court should set a payment schedule to begin after the

defendant’s release from prison.  Id. at 3.  Payments during the term of incarceration should

be handled through the Bureau of Prisons, not the courts.  Id. at *3.  In his reply brief, filed

after the Sawyer decision, Weber concedes that his argument is now foreclosed by that

decision.  Accordingly, we conclude that the district court did not err by setting a payment

schedule to begin after Weber’s release from incarceration.

AFFIRMED.
Order entered July 22, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00165-CR

ARTURO SILVA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-30899-R

ORDER

The Court ORDERS court reporter Susan Tabaee to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the 

date of this order, a supplemental record containing State’s Exhibit no. 120, a DVD, and State’s 

Exhibit no. 121, the search warrant.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Susan Tabaee, official court 

reporter, Auxiliary Court No. 7, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Northeast Automotive Holdings, Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 20, 2011                                                     |              |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|
|                                                                   |              |
| Northeast Automotive Holdings,  Inc.                         |              |
|                                                                   |              |
| By:                                                                    | /s/ William Solko |   |
| William Solko, Chief Executive Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer |              |

----
Order entered July 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00197-CR

GREGORY MOSES GUAJARDO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-11828-M

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant 

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any 

other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 

trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 

appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeal.
 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, 

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date 

of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal 

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0016

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ELIZABETH MARGARET HOSCHOUER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 23, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Beth Baker

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 16 2023

05/16/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0016