Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 27, 2009 / Notices 4733 

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF VOTING AGE FOR EACH STATE AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: JULY 1, 2008— 

Continued 

Area Population 18 

and over Area Population 18 and over 

Massachusetts .......................................................... 5,070,934 Virginia ..................................................................... 5,945,888 

Michigan .................................................................... 7,613,224 Washington .............................................................. 5,008,049 

Minnesota .................................................................. 3,965,749 West Virginia ............................................................ 1,428,310 

Mississippi ................................................................. 2,171,898 Wisconsin ................................................................. 4,313,555 

Wyoming .................................................................. 404,211 

I have certified these counts to the 

Federal Election Commission. 

Dated: January 12, 2009. 

Carlos M. Gutierrez, 

Secretary, U.S. Department of Commerce. 

[FR Doc. E9–1687 Filed 1–26–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

Proposed Information Collection; 

Comment Request; Statement by 

Ultimate Consignee and Purchaser 

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and 

Security. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of 

Commerce, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork and 

respondent burden, invites the general 

public and other Federal agencies to 

take this opportunity to comment on 

proposed and/or continuing information 

collections, as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

submitted on or before March 30, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments 

to Diana Hynek, Departmental 

Paperwork Clearance Officer, 

Department of Commerce, Room 7845, 

14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230 (or via the 

Internet at dHynek@doc.gov). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information or 

copies of the information collection 

instrument and instructions should be 

directed to Larry Hall, BIS ICB Liaison, 

(202) 482–4895, lhall@bis.doc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Abstract 

The Statement by Ultimate Consignee 

and Purchaser is required in support of 

an export license application where the 

country of ultimate destination is in 

Country Group Q,S,V,W,Y or Z. It is 

used by licensing officers in 

determining the validity of the end-use. 

II. Method of Collection 

Paper (Form BIS–711) or company 

letterhead. 

III. Data 

OMB Control Number: 0694–0021. 

Form Number(s): BIS–711. 

Type of Review: Regular submission. 

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

1,884. 

Estimated Time per Response: 16 

minutes. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 582. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost to 

Public: $0. 

IV. Request for Comments 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden 

(including hours and cost) of the 

proposed collection of information; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including through the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized and/or 

included in the request for OMB 

approval of this information collection; 

they also will become a matter of public 

record. 

Dated: January 22, 2009. 

Gwellnar Banks, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. E9–1682 Filed 1–26–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–33–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–351–840] 

Certain Orange Juice From Brazil: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Changed Circumstances Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: January 27, 2009. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) has conducted a 

changed circumstances review on 

certain orange juice (OJ) from Brazil to 

determine whether the antidumping 

duty order should be revoked with 

respect to imports of ultra low pulp 

orange juice (ULPOJ). On October 10, 

2008, the Department published the 

preliminary results of its changed 

circumstances review, in which we 

found that there was sufficient interest 

on the part of the domestic industry to 

justify maintaining the order with 

respect to ULPOJ. See Certain Orange 

Juice from Brazil: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review and Intent Not to 

Revoke, In Part, 73 FR 60241 (Oct. 10, 

2008) (Preliminary Results). 

We invited parties to comment on our 

preliminary results of review. Based on 

our analysis of the comments received, 

we have not changed the final results 

from those presented in the Preliminary 

Results. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Eastwood or Henry Almond; 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3874 or (202) 482– 

0049, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 9, 2006, the Department 

published in the Federal Register an 

antidumping duty order on OJ from 

Brazil. See Antidumping Duty Order: 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES6

4734 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 27, 2009 / Notices 

1These entities are opposing revocation of the 

order in part in this changed circumstances review; 

however, another petitioner, Southern Gardens 

Citrus Processing Corporation, has not joined these 

entities in opposing Tropicana’s request. 

Certain Orange Juice From Brazil, 72 FR 

12183 (Mar. 9, 2006). 

On April 29, 2008, at the request of 

Tropicana Products, Inc. (Tropicana), a 

domestic producer of orange juice, the 

Department initiated a changed 

circumstances review of the order to 

consider partially revoking the order 

with respect to ULPOJ, pursuant to 

section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 

351.216(b) and 351.222(g)(1)(i). See 

Certain Orange Juice From Brazil: 

Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review, 73 FR 23182 

(Apr. 29, 2008). On October 10, 2008, 

the Department published the 

preliminary results of this changed 

circumstances review. See Preliminary 

Results, 73 FR 60241. In the Preliminary 

Results, we found that there was 

sufficient interest on the part of the 

domestic OJ industry to justify 

maintaining the order with respect to 

ULPOJ. 

We invited parties to comment on our 

preliminary results of review. In 

November 2008, we received case and 

rebuttal briefs from Tropicana and the 

petitioners in this case (i.e., Florida 

Citrus Mutual, A. Duda & Sons, Inc. 

(doing business as Citrus Belle), and 

Citrus World, Inc.).1 Based on our 

analysis of the comments received, we 

have not changed the final results from 

those presented in the Preliminary 

Results. 

Scope of the Order 

The scope of this order includes 

certain orange juice for transport and/or 

further manufacturing, produced in two 

different forms: (1) Frozen orange juice 

in a highly concentrated form, 

sometimes referred to as frozen 

concentrated orange juice for 

manufacture (FCOJM); and (2) 

pasteurized single-strength orange juice 

which has not been concentrated, 

referred to as not-from-concentrate 

(NFC). At the time of the filing of the 

petition, there was an existing 

antidumping duty order on frozen 

concentrated orange juice (FCOJ) from 

Brazil. See Antidumping Duty Order; 

Frozen Concentrated Orange Juice from 

Brazil, 52 FR 16426 (May 5, 1987). 

Therefore, the scope of this order with 

regard to FCOJM covers only FCOJM 

produced and/or exported by those 

companies which were excluded or 

revoked from the pre-existing 

antidumping order on FCOJ from Brazil 

as of December 27, 2004. Those 

companies are Cargill Citrus Limitada; 

Coinbra-Frutesp S.A.; Sucocitrico 

Cutrale, S.A.; Fischer S.A. Comercio, 

Industria and Agricutura; and 

Montecitrus Trading S.A. 

Excluded from the scope of the order 

are reconstituted orange juice and 

frozen concentrated orange juice for 

retail (FCOJR). Reconstituted orange 

juice is produced through further 

manufacture of FCOJM, by adding 

water, oils and essences to the orange 

juice concentrate. FCOJR is 

concentrated orange juice, typically at 

42 Brix, in a frozen state, packed in 

retail-sized containers ready for sale to 

consumers. FCOJR, a finished consumer 

product, is produced through further 

manufacture of FCOJM, a bulk 

manufacturer’s product. 

The subject merchandise is currently 

classifiable under subheadings 

2009.11.00, 2009.12.25, 2009.12.45, and 

2009.19.00 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 

These HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and for customs 

purposes only and are not dispositive. 

Rather, the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive. 

Scope of Changed Circumstances 

Review 

The product subject to this changed 

circumstances review is ULPOJ, which 

is concentrated orange juice with a pulp 

content of two percent or less by 

weight/volume on an 11.8 degree brix 

equivalent base. This product is a form 

of FCOJM and is commonly used in the 

manufacture of soft drink concentrates. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties to this changed 

circumstances review, and to which we 

have responded, are listed in the 

Appendix to this notice and addressed 

in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum (Decision Memo), which 

is adopted by this notice. Parties can 

find a complete discussion of all issues 

raised in this review and the 

corresponding recommendations in this 

public memorandum, which is on file in 

the Central Records Unit, room 1117, of 

the main Department Building. 

In addition, a complete version of the 

Decision Memo can be accessed directly 

on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/ 

frn/. The paper copy and electronic 

version of the Decision Memo are 

identical in content. 

Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review 

More than 15 percent of the domestic 

industry has expressed opposition to 

excluding ULPOJ from the antidumping 

duty order on OJ from Brazil. As a 

result, we determine that producers 

accounting for substantially all of the 

production of the domestic like product 

have not expressed a lack of interest in 

maintaining the order with respect to 

ULPOJ. Thus, we find that changed 

circumstances sufficient to warrant 

revocation in part of the antidumping 

duty order on OJ from Brazil do not 

exist. The current requirements for the 

cash deposit of estimated antidumping 

duties on the subject merchandise will 

remain in effect until further notice. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APOs) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.306. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 

violation. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.216. 

Dated: January 16, 2009. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix—Issue in the Decision 

Memorandum 

Issue: Whether the Department 

Should Include Growers in its Industry 

Support Determination. 

[FR Doc. E9–1586 Filed 1–26–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–475–819] 

Certain Pasta From Italy: Notice of 

Partial Rescission of Twelfth (2007) 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: January 27, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andrew McAllister or Brandon 

Farlander, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

1, Import Administration, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 

482–1174 and (202) 482–0182, 

respectively. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES6