alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995             JAN-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1994
<CASH>                                           2,116                   1,261
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,622                   2,598
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        339                     401
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,559                   4,758
<PP&E>                                          94,084                  95,587
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,329                  27,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,406                  73,542
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,011                  11,936
<BONDS>                                         51,390                  46,180
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,752                  15,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,406                  73,542
<SALES>                                         45,399                  46,157
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,399                  46,157
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (46,029)                (41,035)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,791)                 (4,495)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,421)                     627
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,421)                     627
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>                       0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
<FN>
<F1>Class A Unitholders..........$(1.50)
    Class B Unitholders..........$ 2.86

<F2>Class A Unitholders..........$(0.10)
    Class B Unitholders..........$ 1.25
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO RULE 13-A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSU ANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

I, Quentin T.Kelly, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-KSB of WorldWater & Power Corp.;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.                 Based myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a.                 designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure the material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

b.                evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

c.                 presented in thisannual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a.                 all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

b.                any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.                 Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annualreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

|        | By:    | /s/ QUENTIN T.  KELLY |
|--------|--------|-----------------------|
|   | NAME:  | QUENTIN T. KELLY      |
|   | Title: | Chairman of the Board |

 

Dated: April 14, 2006

----
Name of Sentencing Judicial Officer: THE HONORABLE DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Date of Original Sentence: 08/2512011

Original Offense: Count I: Unlawful Transport Of Firearms - I 8:922G

Original Sentence: 78 months imprisonment, 36 months supervised release

Special Conditions: Special Assessment, Substance Abuse Testing, Alcohol Treatment, Drug Treatment

Type of Supervision: Supervised Release Date Supervision Commenced: 08/10/2018

NONCOMPLIANCE SUMMARY

The offender has not complied with the following condition(s) of supervision:

Violation Number Nature of Noncompliance

On September 28, 2018, Alexander was arrested by New Jersey State Policeand charged with three counts of drug offenses: 1) possession with intent to

distribute heroin within 1000 feet of a school in violation of NJSC 2C:35-7A:2) manufacturing and distribution of heroin in violation of NJSC 2C:35-5B(3);and 3) conspiracy to distribute cds in violation of NJSC 2C5-2A(1). This

matter remains pending in New Jersey Superior Court, Essex Vicinage and his

next court date is October 22, 2018. Alexander was arrested along with KhalifSpivey, who is also on supervised release. We are awaiting the incidentreports from New Jersey State Police.

U.S. Probation Officer Action:

At this time, we request no formal action be taken until receipt of the incident report. We have referred

Alexander to our in-house Moral Reconation Therapy (MRT) program which is a cognitive behavioralprogram that focuses on decision making.

Respectfully submitted,By: Amy J. Capozzolo

U.S. Probation Officer

Date: 10/09/2018
F Other

Signature ofJudicial

0 ftc r

)o//oicP

Date
k sec^ff.^^ ^^17 2015

J/^ ^ Tlwr ) Supreme Jud/cra/ 2>ff/rrc-/

ffliirvn for &fenf/'en t>/? 7/'mr

To ff/e 7>i-h'-/>pf? p?r &ffCr£/?#/?asy £er/eus

~7e ~/ht foMtfittie Juaqes ^ /fa j?w supr^ne Jv&c*/

UUrt e£ Appeals:

ftfats mm 7)&mn PuoSer, a,ppe//ds?S as?ff fr/£/

-thrj mri'M fvr *n M(nf/m ^ //>%, ,» u/fa-tf, v# &/, *_

Mhfon ftr DrHrtH'Pnary fern*/, //? fup^rt •/> //?,/ /ntfitn, ttppt/fans fhonAf -/he court Jhe /^//fj^/^MLED IN

COURTS CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUL 22 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk

ike elpp///&rh? waj contfc-/£d ,•/? //^ 2//m £>,&„?/ Cnvrt eC Dm***? Cffun/y, Twos. rhe Pfrntrxtu j^ p^e

IP. Mmn «u»*r. rtu Jury ajsfssn Ske fiuJZZ,
/Jo. 5k3-ob -So?3>

' ' 3T.

~7fa tipper/an/ waf represented by Chns/tp/ur- Abdl, Chm/nrS Poimj fpec/OtO/spy 2b£>9 Sfijebrust? 7>r?ve

J'Ul/e lOZ,, P/fiUjer Mur?*, T&XXS -7St><L$. ft/V C*u*re/

filed 01 Pe/r'/O^r? far /jppeyv/ Or? /?ehto/P #P -appe/t/utS,

flppil/otsto Cause A/0. 02-/4-P0>30>(^CP. Or? JU/7e //'",20/s

ilu 2A/D COUr/ or AppeaSj Dented J/u qr9to?df #£

OLpptat Sitking /0 yr^cnJ Appellor?/ ol eveu; pw'j/?/Ke/?s

hsotriny

HZ.

~Pke ///vu fvr P/tny ol PeP/Zopr? /vr 2>rrcrM:e/?^/y fijln'lW ftf -this CdMJe Hyp/res pr? July itr*, ^p/5. utt/h/r?

/5 drius o£ /e/os dale on July ?fr, 2^e/5 /he ny?/?e/tronS

POiaj Pi/u /h/J mot/On Por 0yfee7frvr7 ff£ feme So fr/f

PeH/rpr? far D/scr/p'pn&ry fyweuj.

JST.

ApptJffflT/j r/qitt/J far asi i/jotensoor &f /site or

(jUhi'lft /O Pi'U 01 Plh/fon rvr D/SCr/p/orr^ry /&w/u> OS

bOUid upen /he Pit/twiny Pko/S : /dppel/rcn/ Of eurrent/y

incoisrcerahr/ m -/kt Te#&f DtpovrtewnS of fawns Jus/re?,

firototik&t*/ 14mm, p.p. Soy 9ono>, t/endtrter?, tk ~7&s3.

AppC/tanS was represented by Ctir/Stoptur /?W m py?pe;/a/e

Cause iJc 02- /*/- l)03&ts- C& . 4ppe//#/rf was net tutepu^fe/y

ripruenJed Uj SOud cmn/ep Purthermere Counsel drd rrt

prvuid uoHh Jhi Peh/oor? Per pipped ou /LqrjuJ c*pw tu
/Jet- ^C?3-0b~5c>f3

fappe/tant Owd stud Counsel'. Appetf^S rrq^rer Adequa/*

//IW -fo retonn netAy Cv^nseS ~tp represent h/en. fur?farm*/?,

appellors? no/ or?iu rued/ the -tome Se retoun new ceuirey

bap oUSo sueelf jdu'd cpiys?st/ /o hotve Stew so watu/ore

ih/ Ortyfno/t Pi/Offor? for /Ippraf o^d property P?/r ^

Pbh/Ooeo for Drfcre/ftnstrty t^eire^.

WtttdEFOiE) CLppe/totrrt preays the Ceurt tyrant -th/S

fDrtiW per pY-fensoon oP Vivie se fo/o Pe/0//en for Dosorehora^y

favfeut, oriel o^r/end fhi /ime for fi/onoy 01 Pe/?//?/? P?r

Tk'tCrttfMtoij Psiyieuy </• f/Cfot?er //ret/ zo/5.

9SpU/Pu/fif Ju^m/Sl-ed

(dro Si) IcUjuvAit^

Dtom'n //ureter 7Pci /pr/fa/wo

Rritdsh&Hy Uerf-/

Pi Sox ?o?od

//iroierson, 7% 7fo?$3
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - November 2007 

Benefit payments November 2007 November 2006 

Regular Retirement 

and Survivor Benefits 

Total 

Retired employ

Spouses and d

Widow(er)s - ag

Other survivors 

ees 

ivorced spouses 

ed and disabled 

22,722,000 

98,698,000 

156,365,000 

$818,027,000 

540,242,000 

22,513,000 

100,382,000 

155,709,000 

$829,606,000 

551,003,000 

Average under 

Being paid Awarded in Social Security 

Monthly benefits end of month month November 2007 

Number Average1 Number Average1 Being Paid Awarded 

Total 574,300 ......... 2,500 ......... ......... .........

Regular employee annuities, total 277,500 $1,933 1,100 $2,572 ......... .........

 Age 193,100 1,900 2 500 2 3,058 $1,054 3 $1,438

 Disability, Full Retirement Age and Over 34,000 1,718 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Disability, Under Full Retirement Age 50,400 2,206 300 2,487 981 1,021 

Spouses and divorced spouses 137,300 713 800 854 504 370 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 133,200 1,172 500 1,559 997 823 

Widowed mothers and fathers 900 1,480 4/ 1,597 765 746 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 14,300 778 100 858 5/ 5/ 

Children 11,100 856 4/ 1,168 688 686 

Other survivors 100 779 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Benefit payments 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

November 

2007 

$5,077,000 

November 

2006 

$5,122,000 

Number 

121,300 

Average 

$42 600 

Number 

$41 

Average 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement. 

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 36); about 300

 other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis. 

4

Fewer than 50. 

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers. 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. 

Regular retirement and survivor benefit payments total includes hospital insurance benefits for services in Canada. 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

November 2007 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Average payment 

Unemployment 

Sickness 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

3,100 

5,900 

Unemployment

 Sickness 

Total 

Per 2-week 

registration period

 Per

 full week 

$532 $292 

535 293 

November 2007 

Benefit payments 

November 2006 

$6,766,000 $7,731,000 

2,905,000 2,683,000 

3,861,000 5,048,000

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited). Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary 

Recycled

 Paper
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Stokes, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-5128.] 

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. STOKES. 

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Stokes, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-5128.] 

(No. 2014-1905—Submitted July 26, 2016—Decided July 28, 2016.) 

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 

____________________ 

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 

application for reinstatement by respondent, Angela Rochelle Stokes, Attorney 

Registration No. 0025650, last known address in Bratenahl, Ohio. 

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 18, 2014, 

wherein the court, pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. V(5a)(B), imposed an interim 

remedial suspension, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that 

order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). 

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 

the practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that respondent’s 

reinstatement is conditioned upon her continued compliance with her agreement 

to never run for, seek, accept appointment to, or hold any judicial position in any 

Ohio state court, excluding federal court positions. 

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be 

made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2). 

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Stokes, 143 Ohio St.3d 

1217, 2014-Ohio-5536, 35 N.E.3d 524. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY,

FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. 

________________________
KMB-12.31.12-EX10O






Exhibit No. (10)o


Outside Directors' Compensation
(Effective January 1, 2013)




Each Outside Director of Kimberly-Clark Corporation will receive the following compensation for his or her services as a director, in accordance with the terms of the Corporation's 2011 Outside Directors' Compensation Plan (amended and restated as of April 21, 2011) (the “Plan”).  The compensation elements listed below supersede or are in lieu of all other cash or stock options currently set out under the Plan:


		
	•
	A cash retainer in the amount of $90,000, payable in quarterly installments in advance. No separate meeting fees will be payable for attending board and committee meetings.  Outside Directors joining the Board during the year will receive the full quarterly amount of the annual retainer for the quarter in which they join the Board and each quarter thereafter.




		
	•
	A grant of Restricted Share Units with a value of $155,000 on the grant date, based on the closing price for the Corporation's common stock on that date (the “Grant Date Price”). This grant will be made effective as of the first business day of the year.  Outside Directors joining the Board during the year will receive a pro-rata grant of Restricted Share Units upon the effective date of their election to the Board.




		
	•
	The Chairman of each of the Audit, Management Development and Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees will each receive an additional grant of Restricted Share Units with a value of $20,000 based on the Grant Date Price.  This grant will be made effective as of the first business day of the year.




		
	•
	The Lead Director will receive an additional grant of Restricted Share Units with a value of $30,000 based on the Grant Date Price.  This grant will be made effective as of the first business day of the year.




		
	•
	The Restricted Period for the Restricted Share Units shall commence on the date of grant and expire on the date each recipient retires from or otherwise terminates service on the Board. The Restricted Share Units may not be transferred during the Restricted Period.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Ramesh Kapur d/b/a AIC Management v. Steven Engelhardt and Engelhardt Law, PLLC

Ap pellate case number: 01

- 1 9

- 00 714

- C V

Trial court case number: 2017

- 56784

Trial court: 207th District Court of Harris County

On December 10, 2019, the Court dismissed this appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5, 20.1, 42.3(c); see also T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041; Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- District Litigation, Misc.

Docket No. 15

- 9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Appellant, however, paid the required fees on December 10, 2019. Accordingly, we withdraw the Court’s memorandum opinion and judgment in the above

- referenced appeal issued on December 10, 2019 and reinstate the

case on the Cour t’s active docket. See Univ. of Tex. Health Sci. Ctr. v. Gutierrez , 237 S.W.3d 869, 870 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet. denied ) (withdrawing opinion and judgment sua sponte within Court’s plenary power) ; see also T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 19.1 (“Plenary P ower of Courts of Appeals”)

.

The record is due on December 13, 2019. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.1.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Julie Countiss

____________________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: December 12, 2019
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6466

KENNETH WAYNE WOODFIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-01-444) Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 28, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Wayne Woodfin, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994). 2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth Wayne Woodfin appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Woodfin v. Angelone , No. CA-01-444 (E.D. Va. Mar. 7, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 23(a)
                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                                    
                                    
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
(Form S-8, Nos. 33-17196, 33-44822, 33-44877, 33-44876, 33-22459, 33-38491,
33-54075, 33-54079, 33-54077 and Form S-3, No. 33-36001) pertaining to
various stock option and employee savings plans of Wellman, Inc. of our
report dated February 14, 1996, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) of Wellman, Inc.


                                             Ernst & Young LLP



Charlotte, North Carolina
March 25, 1996
Exhibit 10.90
March 10, 2003

Mr. James J. Bigl
President
NMHC Systems, Inc.
26 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050

Re:      In the Matter of the First Addendum to the Lease of Premises
         between B/A Airport Park Solutions,  LLC and National Medical
         Health Card Systems, Inc. located at 23 British American Boulevard,
         Airport Park, Latham, NY 12110

Dear Mr. Bigl:

     The Lease to Premises between B/A Airport Park Solutions,  LLC and National
Medical  Health Card  Systems,  Inc.  dated the First day of November  2002,  is
hereby amended, supplemented and modified as follows, to wit:

          1. The square  footage of the Premises  will be increased by 2,618 rsf
     ("Additional  Space").  Therefore,  the total  square  footage  occupied by
     Tenant on the second and first floor of the building  will be 22,018 rsf as
     shown on Exhibit "A".

          2. The term of the  Lease for the  "Additional  Space"  will  commence
     February 1, 2003 and will be coterminous with the existing Lease.

          3.  Commencing on February 1, 2003, the Tenant's  monthly rent will be
     adjusted  to  $31,944.  Tenant  will  be  responsible  for  payment  of its
     utilities (electricity and gas).

          4. The  pro-rata  share as stated in  Paragraph  2 "Base Year" will be
     increased to 59.5%.

          5. The Landlord,  at the Tenants direction,  will expend $8.00 for the
     purposes of building out and improving the space.

          6. Except as set forth herein,  all other terms and  provisions of the
     Lease remain unchanged and are hereby affirmed.

     Kindly  execute the extra  copies of this letter  thereby  indicating  your
agreement thereto.


<PAGE>



                                     B/A Airport Park Solutions, LLC.

                                     By:________________________________
                                        British American Development Corp.
                                        Its Managing Member
                                        Charles W. Poe, Jr.
                                        Executive Vice President


Accepted and agreed to:

NATIONAL MEDICAL HEALTH CARD SYSTEMS, INC.



Mr. James Bigl
President
911 A.2d 66

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PETER N. TARDIBUONO, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

November 21, 2006.

This matter having come before the Court on a petition for certification from the final judgment of the Appellate Division, and *573the Court having granted certification and having summarily remanded the matter to the Appellate Division to supplement or amend its February 7, 2006, order by addressing defendant’s argument on appeal that the trial court should have granted his motion to withdraw his guilty plea prior to sentencing, 187 *N.J.*489, 901 A.2d 952 (2006),

And the Appellate Division having filed an order on remand on August 10,2006, supplementing its prior Order,

And the Court having reviewed the matter in the context of the record and the Appellate Division’s supplemental order,

And good cause appearing;

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.