# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18

- 1870 V (not to be published)

MICHELE CRAYCRAFT

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: June 11, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Attorney’s Fees and Costs

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC , for

P etitioner.

Julia Marter Collison , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY ’ S FEES AND COSTS 1

On December 6, 2018, Michele Craycraft (“ P etitioner ”) filed a petition for

compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C.

§300aa

- 10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder

injury related to vaccine administration as a result of an influ enza vaccine administered

on October 20, 2017. ( Petition at 1 )

. On November 16, 2020

, a decision was issued

awarding compensation to P etitioner based on the parties’ stipulation. (ECF No. 3 8 )

.

1 Because this unpublished D ecision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the D ecision will be available to anyone with access to the

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact

medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated May 1 8 , 2021,

(ECF No. 43 ) , requesting a total award of $ 34,365.88 (representing $ 32,431.00 in fees

and $ 1,934.88 in costs). In accordance with General Order No. 9, counsel for Petitioner

represents that Petitioner incurred no out

- of

- pocket expenses. ( Id. at 1 ). Respondent

reacted to the motion on May 21

, 2021, indicating that he is satisfied that the statutory

requirements for an award of attorney’s fees and costs are met in this case

, and defer s resolution of the amount to be awarded to my discretion

. (ECF No. 44 ). Petitioner filed a

reply on May 21, 2021, req uesting that the Court award all fees and costs requested in

Petitioner’s application. (ECF No. 45).

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with P etitioner’s request. In my
experience , the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested

hours or rates.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney ’ s fees and costs

. Section

15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney ’ s fees and costs. I

award a total of $34,365.88 (representing $32,431.00 in fees and $1,934.88 in costs) as

a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel

. In the absence of a timely

- filed motion for review (see A ppendix B to the Rules of the

Court), the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.