alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT M AR TA GIL-R

AB ADO, AKA M a

rtha Olivia Gil, AKA M arta

Gonz a le s, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 12-71770 Age n c y No. A200-246-293 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d April 22, 2015 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, B YB EE, a nd C HRISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. M arta Gil-R a ba do, a native and c itiz e n of M e x ic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a l s’ orde r dismissing her a ppe a l from

an im m i gration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c i sion de ny ing he r a pplic ation for a sy lum , withholding of re m ova l, a

nd prote c tion unde r the C onve ntion Agai nst Torture(“ C AT” ). W e have 

# FIL ED APR 29 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide n c e fa c tua l findings. Ze haty e v . Gonzale s , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th C ir. 2006). W e de ny the p e tition for re v i e w. Gil-R a b a do doe s not c ha lle nge the a g e n c y ’ s de te rm ination tha t she did not e sta blish pa st pe rse c ution in M e xic o. Se eMartine z -Se rrano v . IN

S , 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th C ir. 1996). Eve n if Gil-R a ba do qua lifie d for a

n e xc e ption for the untim e l y filing of he r a sy lum a

p plic ation, substa

ntia l e vide nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s de te rm i n ation tha t Gil-R a ba do fa ile d to e s ta

blish tha t he r fe ar of future ha rm wa s obje c tive ly

re a sona ble . Se eGu v . Gonzale

s , 454 F.3d 1014, 1022 (9th C ir. 2006) (pe titione r fa i le d to “pre se nt c om pe lling, obje c t ive e vide nc e de m onstra

ting a we ll-founde d fe ar of pe rse c ution” ). W e re je c t Gil-R a

ba do’ s c onte ntion tha

t the IJ a p plie d a n e rrone o u s le g a l sta

nda rd in c onc l uding tha

t he r fe ar of pe rse c ution wa s not obje c tive ly re a sona b le . S e ePrasad v . IN

S , 47 F.3d 336, 340 (9th C ir. 1995) (disagre e m e nt with re sult did not m e a n tha t a ge nc y a pplie d wrong le ga l sta

nda rd). Thus, Gil-Ra

ba d o ’ s a sy lum

c la i m fa ils. B e c a use Gil-R a

ba do ha s not e s ta

blishe d e ligibility

for a sy lum , she ne c e ssa rily c annot m e e t the m ore stringe nt sta nda rd for withholding of rem o va l. Se eZe haty e , 453 F.3d a

t 1190.

1 2 - 7 1 7 7 0

2Fina lly , substa ntia l e v ide nc e a lso supports the IJ’ s de nia l of C AT re l ie f be c a use Gil-R a

ba do fa i le d to e sta

blish it is m

ore like ly tha n not tha t she would be torture d by

or with thec onse nt or a c q uie s c e n c e of the gove rnm e nt if re turne d to M e x ic o. Se e Silay a v . Muk ase y , 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th C ir. 2008). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 2 - 7 1 7 7 0 3
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Darrin Duane Ervin, * From the 39th District Court

of Haskell County,

Trial Court No. 6937.

Vs. No. 11-19-00228-CR * June 17, 2021

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J. 

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Filed 7/23/15 P. v. Covarrubias CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.111.5. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

 Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

DANIEL JOSEPH COVARRUBIAS, 

 Defendant and Appellant.

2d Crim. No. B262418

(Super. Ct. No. 2011026104)

(Ventura County)

Daniel Joseph Covarrubias appeals his conviction by plea to possession of 

cocaine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351), entered after appellant filed two motions 

to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5) and withdrew the motions pursuant to a 

negotiated plea. The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and granted probation 

with 150 days county jail and a one-year driver's license suspension (Veh. Code, § 

13202). Appellant was ordered to pay, among other things, a $404.23 criminal justice 

administrative fee (Gov. Code, §§ 29550, 29550.1), a $50 crime lab fine (Health & Saf. 

Code, § 11372.5), a $150 drug program fine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11372.7), $300 

restitution, and a $142 monthly probation fee. 

We appointed counsel to represent appellant on this appeal. After 

examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised.
2

On June 3, 2015, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to 

personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. We have 

received no response from appellant.

The preliminary hearing transcript and probation report reflect that 

appellant and Daniel Lopez sold cocaine to a confidential informant in a controlled buy. 

After appellant was arrested, Ventura County Deputy Sheriff Javier Chavez made a 

preliminary search of appellant's cell phone, then obtained a search warrant to search the

entire contents of the cell phone. 

We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's 

attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. 

(People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 125-

126.) 

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

YEGAN, J.

We concur:

GILBERT, P.J.

PERREN, J
3

Jeffrey Bennett, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________

California Appellate Project, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, 

Jonathan B. Stiner, Executive Director and Richard B. Lennon, Staff Attorney, for 

Defendant ad Appellant.

No appearance for Respondent.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IMPINJ, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

NXP USA, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2024-1045

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 4:19-cv-03161-YGR,

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

Case: 24-1045 Document: 31 Page: 1 Filed: 03/14/2024
2 IMPINJ, INC. V. NXP USA, INC.

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

March 14, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: March 14, 2024

Case: 24-1045 Document: 31 Page: 2 Filed: 03/14/2024
Case 2:11-cv-00536-PGS -ES Document 2 Filed 12/09/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 50
Case 2:11-cv-00536-PGS -ES Document 2 Filed 12/09/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 51
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - June 2003 

Regular Retirement 

and Survivor Benefits 

Benefit payments June 2003 

Total 

Retired employees 

Spouses and divorced spouses 

Widow(er)s - aged and disabled 

Other survivors 21,561,000 20,814,000 

156,419,000 155,941,000 

451,493,000 

88,829,000 88,267,000 

June 2002 

$737,218,000 $716,515,000 

470,409,000 

Number Average1 Number Average1 

Total 629,800 ......... 2,500 ......... ......... 

Regular employee annuities, total 293,600 $1,580 1,000 $2,163 ......... 

Age 211,200 1,543 2 400 2 2,561 3 $1,167 

Disability, Full Retirement Age and Over 36,200 1,407 ......... ......... ......... 

Disability, Under Full Retirement Age 46,200 1,883 400 2,130 

Spouses and divorced spouses 147,400 594 700 740 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 160,200 973 600 1,358 

Widowed mothers and fathers 1,000 1,249 4/ 1,459 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 14,900 645 100 761 

Children 12,600 744 100 1,042 

Other survivors 100 647 ......... ......... ......... 

5/ / 

589 600 

852 730 

......... 

639 663 

839 918 

439 326 

$899 

......... 

......... 

......... 

Monthly benefits 

Being Paid Awarded 

Average under 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded in 

month 

Social Security 

June 2003 

5

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

Benefit payments 

June June 

2003 2002 Number Average 

$5,437,000 $5,604,000 129,600 $42 500 $41 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Number Average 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement.

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 35); some 200

other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis.

4

Fewer than 50.

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers.

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

June 2003 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Unemployment 2,500 $254.65 

Sickness 5,700 257.95 

Unemployment 

Sickness 2,739,000 2,815,000 

1,617,000 3,055,000 

Benefit payments 

June 2002 

Total $4,356,000 $5,869,000 

455.19 

June 2003 

Per 

full week 

$436.70 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period 

Average payment 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding 

Recycled 

Paper 

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary and the Office of Public Affairs
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

This
Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.

The undersigned, who are the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Omni
Financial Services, Inc. (the issuer), hereby certify as follows:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10Q of the
issuer (the Report), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

Dated this 14th day of November, 2006.



/s/ Stephen M. KleinStephen M. Klein, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Constance E. PerrineConstance E. Perrine, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
----

----

|   | 1. | The      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of and for the period covered by theReport. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/      Neil Martucci       |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   | Neil      Martucci           |   |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer |   |
|   | August      13, 2009         |   |

----
COURT OF APPEALS

S E C O N D D I S T R I C T O F T E X A S

CHIEF JUSTICE

 TERRIE LIVINGSTON

JUSTICES

 LEE ANN DAUPHINOT

 ANNE GARDNER

 SUE WALKER

 BILL MEIER

 LEE GABRIEL

 BONNIE SUDDERTH

TIM CURRY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER

401 W. BELKNAP, SUITE 9000

FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76196-0211

TEL: (817) 884-1900

FAX: (817) 884-1932

www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa

CLERK 

 DEBRA SPISAK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

 LISA M. WEST

GENERAL COUNSEL

 CLARISSA HODGES

July 28, 2015

Paul Francis

P.O. Box 13369

1178 W. Pioneer Parkway

Arlington, TX 76013

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Debra A. Windsor

Assistant District Attorney

401 W. Belknap St.

Fort Worth, TX 76196-0201

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 02-15-00148-CR

02-15-00150-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 1370580D

1370579D

Style: Kyle Christopher HowardJohnson

v.

The State of Texas

The appellant’s brief has been filed under the date of Monday, July 27,

2015 in the above referenced cause.

The State’s brief is due Wednesday, August 26, 2015.

You will be notified when a submission date has been set.

Respectfully yours,

DEBRA SPISAK, CLERK

By: Rene Wallace, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 32530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15990]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
    Title: Allocation of Resources for Fire Service and Emergency 
Medical Service.
    OMB Control Number: None.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Review: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 4,427.
    Number of Respondents: 33,200.
    Average Hours Per Response: 8 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection will be used to identify 
resource allocation strategies which most effectively mitigate 
community fire and health risks. The data will be collected in a format 
suitable for advanced regression analysis.
    Affected Public: Not-for-profit institutions (fire department 
officials).
    Frequency: Annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Jasmeet Seehra, (202) 395-3123.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 7845, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5e3a1627303b351e3a313d70393128"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4f2b0736212a240f2b202c61282039">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to Jasmeet Seehra, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-5167, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b2f8d3c1dfd7d7c6edf99cede1d7d7dac0d3f2dddfd09cd7ddc29cd5ddc4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ec4effde3ebebfad1c5a0d1ddebebe6fcefcee1e3eca0ebe1fea0e9e1f8">[email protected]</span></a>).

    Dated: July 1, 2009.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-15990 Filed 7-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32199-32200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16035]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, July 9, 
2009 at 1 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.

[[Page 32200]]

    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), (8), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of 
the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
July 9, 2009 will be:

institution and settlement of injunctive actions; institution and 
settlement of administrative proceedings; adjudicatory matters; 
regulatory matter regarding financial institutions; and other 
matters related to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: July 2, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-16035 Filed 7-2-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE P
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-306-04) pertaining to the Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan for
Directors and the Stock Incentive Plan of the Franklin Holding Corporation of
our report dated February 1, 2002 (except for Note 13 as to which the date is
April 3, 2002), with respect to the financial statements and financial
highlights of Franklin Capital Corporation (formerly The Franklin Holding
Corporation) included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2001.

                                        Ernst & Young LLP


New York, New York
April 9, 2002
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

ALVIN MILLER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-17 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed November 27, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; William D. Sites, Judge. Alvin Miller, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Alvin Miller appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief, in which he raised two claims of ineffective assistance of counsel regarding his conviction of attempted sexual battery. We affirm the denial of his second claim without comment. As to his first claim, Mr. Miller argues that "low count number" testing had been utilized in his case and was- 2 -

inadmissible under sections 90.702 1 and 90.703, Florida Statutes (2015), that possible contamination of the DNA samples had occurred, and that the population frequency statistics were unreliable. The limited record attached to the postconviction court's order does not conclusively refute that claim. See Foster v. State, 810 So. 2d 910, 914 (Fla. 2002); Wesby v. State, 230 So. 3d 939, 941 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). We therefore reverse the summary denial of Mr. Miller's first claim and remand for the court to either attach portions of the record that conclusively refute the claim or convene an evidentiary hearing. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.
CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

1 Section 90.702, which states that an expert may testify in the form of an opinion if: "(1) The testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data; (2) [t]he testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and (3) [t]he witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case," codified the test set forth in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and was applicable at the time of Mr. Miller's trial.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-70,816]

Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on May 29, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Callaway Golf Ball Operations, Inc., Chicopee, Massachusetts.

The subject worker group is covered by an earlier petition (TA-W-70,744) filed on May 29, 2009 that is the subject of an ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of June 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-15762 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION









EXHIBIT 10.79




 




 




 




STRAIGHT NOTE




 




 








	

  $400,000


  	

   


  	

  South El Monte, California


  	

   


  	

  August 13, 2001


  










 




 




                For value received, Lee Pharmaceuticals

promises to pay Mark DiSalvo or order, at South El Monte, California the sum of

FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS, with interest from August 13, 2001, on unpaid

principal at the rate of twenty (20) per cent per annum; principal is payable

monthly, commencing on September 15, 2001, with monthly principal payments of

$6,000.  Interest shall be calculated on

the basis of the unpaid principal balance daily, based on a 365-day year,

actual day month and payable monthly. 

Principal and interest shall be payable in lawful money of the United

States.  If action were instituted on

this note, I promise to pay such sum as the Court may fix as attorney's

fees.  This note is secured by the

trademark on the product brand DeWitt's Pills®.




 




 




 




 




 




	

  JULY 27,

  2001


  	

   


  	

  RONALD G.

  LEE


  
	

  Date


  	

   


  	

  Lee

  Pharmaceuticals - Ronald G. Lee


  





 




 




 




 




 




	

  JULY 27,

  2001


  	

   


  	

  MICHAEL L.

  AGRESTI


  
	

  Date


  	

   


  	

  Lee

  Pharmaceuticals - Michael L. Agresti