alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1124 

To require the establishment of a working group to evaluate the food safety 

threat posed by beef and poultry imported from Brazil, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 10, 2019 

Mr. TESTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require the establishment of a working group to evaluate 

the food safety threat posed by beef and poultry imported 

from Brazil, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WORKING GROUP ON BEEF AND POULTRY IM4 PORTED FROM BRAZIL. 

5 (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF WORKING GROUP.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days 

7 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec8 retary of Agriculture shall establish a working 

9 group— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1124 IS

1 (A) to evaluate the food safety threat 

2 posed by beef, beef products, poultry, and poul3 try products imported from Brazil; and 

4 (B) to make recommendations to the Sec5 retary with respect to whether the importation 

6 of beef, beef products, poultry, and poultry 

7 products from Brazil into the United States 

8 should be permitted. 

9 (2) MEMBERSHIP.—The Secretary shall ensure 

10 that the working group established under paragraph 

11 (1) includes— 

12 (A) experts on food safety; and 

13 (B) representatives of U.S. Customs and 

14 Border Protection and other Federal agencies 

15 with responsibilities relating to international 

16 trade. 

17 (b) TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF IMPORTS.—Beef, 

18 beef products, poultry, and poultry products imported 

19 from Brazil may not enter the United States during the 

20 period— 

21 (1) beginning on the date of the enactment of 

22 this Act; and 

23 (2) ending on the date on which the working 

24 group established under subsection (a)(1) submits to 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 1124 IS

1 the Secretary the recommendations required by sub2 paragraph (B) of that subsection. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 991 

Expressing support for designation of March 1 as ‘‘National Healthcare 

Professional Appreciation Day’’ in commemoration of the day the first 

American healthcare professional became infected with COVID-19 while 

caring for a patient. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2020 

Mr. FITZPATRICK (for himself, Ms. JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. JOYCE of Pennsylvania, and Ms. UNDERWOOD) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of March 1 as ‘‘National 

Healthcare Professional Appreciation Day’’ in commemoration of the day the first American healthcare professional became infected with COVID-19 while caring for 

a patient. 

Whereas healthcare professionals have put saving and caring 

for others above their own personal health and safety; 

Whereas healthcare professionals have gone above and beyond 

their call of duty to help stem the spread of Coronavirus 

Disease 2019 (in this resolution referred to as ‘‘COVID19’’) through treating and testing millions of Americans 

and by performing vaccine research; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 991 IH 

Whereas healthcare professionals have saved thousands of 

lives during the COVID-19 pandemic with their selfless 

care; 

Whereas through these unprecedented times healthcare professionals have continued to treat and comfort those most 

affected by COVID-19 even when those professionals 

have not had access to adequate personal protective 

equipment; 

Whereas over 10,000 healthcare professionals have tested 

positive for COVID-19; 

Whereas brave healthcare professionals have left their families daily to tend to those in need, and some have not 

seen their loved ones for extended periods of time; 

Whereas many healthcare professionals have been working 

around the clock, seven days a week; 

Whereas hundreds of healthcare professionals have lost their 

lives to COVID-19; and 

Whereas February 29, 2020, a leap day, was the date on 

which the first healthcare professional was infected with 

COVID-19: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National 

3 Healthcare Professional Appreciation Day’’; and 

4 (2) acknowledges the heroism and sacrifice of 

5 healthcare professionals in addressing the COVID6 19 pandemic. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Bernard MITCHELL and S. Mitchell, Trustee of the BSM Living Trust, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ONE WEST BANK, FSB and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-16339.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 7, 2012.*

Filed Dec. 11, 2012.

S. Raye Mitchell, General Counsel, Law Offices of S. Raye Mitchell, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Mark Jeremy Seifert, Esquire, Nicholas B. Waranoff, Keith D. Yandell, Esquire, Allen Matkins, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: SILVERMAN, GOULD, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Bernard Mitchell appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his amended complaint without leave to amend. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of leave to amend. *See Allen v. City of*
      *636
      *Beverly Hills,*911 F.2d 367, 878 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Mitchell’s amended complaint without leave to amend. *See Cook, Perkiss & Liehe, Inc. v. N. Cal. Collection Serv. Inc.,*911 F.2d 242, 247 (9th Cir.1990) (per curiam). The defendants moved to dismiss the federal claims with prejudice, providing Mitchell with notice that his entire complaint, including the pendant state law claims, could be dismissed without leave to amend. Leave to amend is to be freely granted, *see*Fed. R.Civ.P. 15(a)(2), but the district court properly determined that Mitchell could not state a claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act; therefore, amendment would have been futile. Mitchell did not give the district court any indication that he intended to bring an entirely new federal claim. *See Cook,*911 F.2d at 247 (district court did not abuse its discretion by denying leave to amend to add other federal claims where plaintiff did not indicate it had additional claims to bring); *see also Allen,*911 F.2d at 373-74.

In his opening brief, Mitchell did not challenge the district court’s order denying his motion for post-judgment relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) and 60(b). *See Smith v. Marsh,*194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir.1999) (“[Arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”). Even if he had not waived this argument, Mitchell’s claims for relief under Rules 59(e) and 60(b) are unavailing.

AFFIRMED.

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Hon Wan Chan, the Chief Financial Officer of
CHINA INTERACTIVE EDUCATION, INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the
undersigned has executed this statement this  19th day of November,
2010.

/s/ Hon Wan
ChanHon Wan Chan Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China Interactive Education, Inc. and will be retained
by China Interactive Education, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE**

 

**OFFICEROF GENERAL PARTNER OF HILAND HOLDINGS GP, LP**

 

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection withthe report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2008of Hiland Holdings GP, LP (the “Company”) and filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph L. Griffin,Chief Executive Officer and President of Hiland Partners GP Holdings, LLC, thegeneral partner of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: November 10, 2008 | /s/ Joseph L. Griffin                   |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                         | Joseph L. Griffin                       |
|                         | Chief Executive Officer  and  President |

 

----
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 140-2 Filed 09/24/13 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 2323
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 140-2 Filed 09/24/13 Page 2 of 13 PageID: 2324
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 140-2 Filed 09/24/13 Page 3 of 13 PageID: 2325
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 140-2 Filed 09/24/13 Page 4 of 13 PageID: 2326
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 140-2 Filed 09/24/13 Page 5 of 13 PageID: 2327
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 140-2 Filed 09/24/13 Page 6 of 13 PageID: 2328
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 140-2 Filed 09/24/13 Page 7 of 13 PageID: 2329
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 140-2 Filed 09/24/13 Page 8 of 13 PageID: 2330
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 140-2 Filed 09/24/13 Page 9 of 13 PageID: 2331
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 140-2 Filed 09/24/13 Page 10 of 13 PageID: 2332
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 140-2 Filed 09/24/13 Page 11 of 13 PageID: 2333
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 140-2 Filed 09/24/13 Page 12 of 13 PageID: 2334
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 140-2 Filed 09/24/13 Page 13 of 13 PageID: 2335
Exhibit 10.2
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 Agreement Employee Company
 RECITALS
    AGREEMENT
  ARTICLE I  EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP
 Employment
 Duties




---



##### 



Exclusive Employment
 Employee Representations and Warranties as to Employability
  1
    ARTICLE II  PERIOD OF EMPLOYMENT
 Employment Period Employment Period
 Initial Term of Employment Period and Extension Terms Initial Term Extension Term
  2




---



##### 



ARTICLE III  COMPENSATION
 Annual Base Compensation Annual Base
Compensation
 Employee Incentive Compensation Bonus Incentive Compensation Bonus pro rata
 Expenses
 Paid Time Off
 Insurance
  3




---



##### 



Retirement Plan
 Grant of Stock Options
 Options
   Stock Option Plan
 Other Fringe Benefits
 Vehicle Allowance Vehicle
Allowance
 ARTICLE IV  COVENANTS OF EMPLOYEE
 Covenants Regarding Developments Developments
    4




---



##### 



Ownership and Covenant to Return Documents, etc
 Nondisclosure Covenant Confidential and Proprietary Information
  5




---



##### 



Noninterference Covenant Restricted Period
 Covenant of Nonsolicitation of Customers Customer
 Covenant Not To Compete
  6




---



##### 



Remedies for Breach
 TERMINATION
 Termination and Triggering Events Triggering Event
 Rights Upon Occurrence of a Triggering Event
 Death, Total Disability, Resignation, and Termination by the Company for
Cause
 Termination by Company Without Cause pro rated Severance Benefit
  7




---



##### 



Termination Arising Out of a Change of Control pro rated Change of Control Severance Benefit
 Cessation of Entitlements and Company Right of Offset
 Treatment of Options
 Survival of Certain Obligations
  8




---



##### 



Definitions
 Resignation
 Specified Employee
 Termination by the Company for Cause
      Termination by the Company Without Cause
 Termination Arising Out of a Change of Control Change of Control
   9




---



##### 



i.e.
 Total Disability
 ARTICLE VI  GENERAL
 Governing Law
 Binding Effect
 Assignment
  10




---



##### 



Complete Understanding
 Tax Provisions
 Compliance With Section 409A of the Code
 Compliance With Section 162(m) of the Code
 Amendments
 Waiver
  11




---



##### 



Venue, Jurisdiction, Etc
 Indemnification of Employee
 Directors and Officers Liability Insurance
 Severability
 Headings
  12




---



##### 



Notices
 Notices to Employee
 
 Notices to Company
 
 Counterparts
 COMPANY:

    

    EMPLOYEE:SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.By:

    /s/ Jeffrey Park
    11/6/08

    By:

    /s/ John Romza
    
    11/6/08Its:
Chief Financial Officer
    Date

    
    
    John Romza
    
    Date
  13
PKOB I2A

(7/93)

United States District Court

for

District of NewJersey

Report on Offender UnderSupervision

Name ofOffender: Kenyon Malthews Cr.: 11-00039-001

PACTS U: 60520

Name ofSentencing Judicial Officer: THE HONORABLE KATHARINE S. HAYDEN

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dateof Original Sentence: 10/26/2011

Original Offense: Possession ofa Firearm by aConvicted Felon

Original Sentence: 30 months custody, 36 months supervised release

Special Conditions: Special Assessment, Substance Abuse Testing, Alcohol Treatment, Drug Treatment,

Mental Health Treatment

Type ofSupervision: Supervised Release Date Supervision Commenced: 11/13/2012

NONCOMPLIANCE SUMMARY

The offender has not complied with the following condition(s) ofsupervision:

Violation Number Nature ofNonconipliance

I On September 3,2015, the offender was visibly under the influence ofalcohol

during an unscheduled field visit and admitted to consuming alcohol on this

date.

U.S. Probation Officer Action:

While the probation office is discouraged by Matthews's actions, we are requesting an opportunity to

address his noncompliance internally. We are recommending no action be taken at this time. If Your

Honor agrees with our plan, the probation office will present a copy of this order to the offender as a

formal written reprimand. We will advise the Court ofany additional instances ofnoncompliance.

RespectfuI

By:Jamel H. Rucks-Dorsey

U.S. Probation Officer

Date: 09/09/2015

Case 2:11-cr-00039-KSH Document 17 Filed 09/10/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 47
Prob 12A - page2

Kenyon Matthews

Please check a box below toindicate the Court's direction regarding action tobetaken inthis case:

r NoFormal CourtAction to beTakenat ThisTime

r Submit aRequest for Modifying the Conditions or Term ofSupervision

V Submit a Request forWarrant or Summons

P Other

Signature ofJudicial Officer

Date

Case 2:11-cr-00039-KSH Document 17 Filed 09/10/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 48
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,577,493
<SECURITIES>                                 7,359,399
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,977
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,633,470
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,024,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          239,962
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,784,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,024,885
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               759,085
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               369,132
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                389,953
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            389,953
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   389,953
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Blake *against*Jerome.

NEW-YORK,

October, 1817.

A person going or sending on thejmdjf an-o“n property is a trespasser.

IN ERROR, on *certiorari*to a justice’s court. u

The defendant m error, brought an action against the plaintiff *n error, in the court below, for a trespass in entering into ^¡3 antj taking away a mare and colt. The defendant be*411low pleaded the general issue, and gave notice, that the mare and colt were his property. Upon the trial, it appeared, that i they were taken out of the plaintiff’s field, by a person who acted , under the orders and directions of the defendant, after they had been demanded by the defendant, and refused to be delivered to him, and after he had been expressly forbidden to take them. Each party produced evidence to show property in himself, and the justice gave judgment for the plaintiff below, the defendant in error.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment must be affirmed. The evidence as to the right of property in the mare and coltimay be somewhat questionable ; but the defendant below was, at all events, guilty of a tresspass, in sending a person on the land of the plaintiff to take them away. (6 *Johns* Rep.*5.) The action was, therefore, technically supported, and where the evidence as to true ownership of the property is so nearly balanced, the judgment ought not to be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Richard Heyse,
certify that:

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innophos Holdings, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided Innophos Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Innophos
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned expressly disclaims any
obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: May 9, 2008



/s/ RICHARD HEYSERichard Heyse Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as a part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Shani Amit, Respondent, v Hineni Heritage Center, Appellant, Shimon Avitan et al., Respondents.

[856 NYS2d 146]

*575The plaintiff claims that she became ill after attending a Shabbat dinner at the premises of the defendant Hineni Heritage Center (hereinafter Hineni). The food had been prepared by the defendants Shimon Avitan and Yehoud Avital, doing business as Mezonot Glatt Kosher, and delivered to Hineni’s premises approximately seven hours before the dinner.

Shortly after returning home from the dinner, the plaintiff became ill, and the undisputed evidence shows that, of the 70 to 80 dinner guests, at least a dozen other people became ill that night. The plaintiff was later diagnosed as suffering from “food poisoning” and “food-related gastroenteritis.”

Hineni failed to establish, prima facie, its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it (see *Ayotte v Gervasio,*81 NY2d 1062 [1993]; *O’Leary v Bravo Hylan, LLC,*8 AD3d 542 [2004]; *Jaroslawicz v Prestige Caterers,*292 AD2d 232, 233 [2002]). Although Hineni did not prepare the food, it was responsible for its proper storage and service. Yet Hineni failed to submit any evidence showing that the food was properly stored and served. Under these circumstances, Hineni was not entitled to summary judgment.

Moreover, because Hineni failed, prima facie, to establish its own lack of negligence, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment on its cross claim for common-law indemnification against the other defendants *(see Coque v Wildflower Estates Devs, Inc.,*31 AD3d 484, 489-490 [2006]; *Correia v Professional Data Mgt.,*259 AD2d 60, 65 [1999]).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the parties’ remaining contentions. Skelos, J.P., Fisher, Covello and Eng, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7224

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LACARLOS DEMOND CURETON, a/k/a Loco,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District 

Judge. (0:02-cr-01173-JFA-7)

Submitted: January 18, 2011 Decided: January 26, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lacarlos Demond Cureton, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lacarlos Demond Cureton appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. 

R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. United States v. Cureton, No. 

0:02-cr-01173-JFA-7 (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 2010). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED