alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BODDIE-NOELL
PROPERTIES,  INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1997,  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            2,458,565
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        65,537
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3,281,669
<PP&E>                                          157,107,671
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (14,146,933)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  166,111,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,372,438
<BONDS>                                          93,436,477
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                         67,559,320
<OTHER-SE>                                      (11,774,351)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    166,111,683
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 16,251,631
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     6,231,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,580,646
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6,486,858
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1,913,447
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1,913,447
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     182,999
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1,730,448
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.52
                                                           
                                       

</TABLE>
1 The Honorable William Jay Riley became Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on April 1, 2010. 2 The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief J udge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-3083

___________ Dollether Tobar, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Arkansas Department of Correction; * Robert Jackson, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: March 31, 2010 Filed: April 8, 2010

___________ Before RILEY, 1 Chief Judge, BYE and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Dollether Tobar appeals the district court’s 2adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment-discrimination action. After careful de novo review, see Sutherland v. Mo. Dep’t of Corrs. , 580 F.3d 748, 750 (8th Cir. 2009), we conclude-2- summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated in the district court’s thorough, well-reasoned order. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Arbutus  Resources,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  October 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Karen Law,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this  certification as of the
5th day of December, 2006.

/s/  Karen Law
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Henry J. Catenacci, Esq. 

Lisa J. Trembly, Esq. 

Lainie Miller, Esq. 

PODVEY, MEANOR, CATENACCI, HILDNER, 

COCOZIELLO & CHATTMAN, P.C. 

The Legal Center 

One Riverfront Plaza, 8th Floor 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

(973) 623-1000 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, New Jersey Title Insurance Company 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

NEW JERSEY TITLE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, and 

BROWN & BROWN OF 

CONNECTICUT, INC. d/b/a DILL, 

JOYCE & THRESHER INSURANCE, 

 Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:11-civ-630-DMC-JAD 

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE

Henry J. Catenacci, Esq., of full age, states: 

1. I am a director of the law firm of Podvey, Meanor, Catenacci, Hildner, 

Cocoziello & Chattman, a Professional Corporation, counsel for Plaintiff, New Jersey 

Title Insurance Company in this matter. 

2. I hereby certify that on this day, I caused to be filed with the Court and 

served upon all counsel of record via the ECF System: 

(a) Legal Memorandum Submitted By Plaintiff New Jersey 

Title Insurance Company In Opposition To Defendant National Union 

Case 2:11-cv-00630-DMC -JAD Document 17-3 Filed 07/05/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 319
Insurance Company Of Pittsburgh’s Motion To Dismiss The Complaint 

Pursuant To Rule 12(B)(6); and 

(b) Declaration of Henry J. Catenacci. 

 I certify that the foregoing statement made by me is true. I am aware if any of the 

foregoing statements made by me are willfully false, I am subject to punishment and 

sanctions. 

 

 /s/Henry J. Catenacci 

 Henry J. Catenacci 

Dated: July 5, 2011 

292610 

Case 2:11-cv-00630-DMC -JAD Document 17-3 Filed 07/05/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 320
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
      December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I, William B. Horne, as the Chief Executive and Financial Officer of
      the
      Registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
      that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





Dated:
                April 21, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                William B. HorneWilliam
                B. HorneChief
                Executive and Financial Officer






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen R. Brunner, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and President of Constellation Energy Partners LLC, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:

(i) The
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Constellation Energy Partners LLC.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Stephen R. Brunner                                        
|Stephen R. Brunner                                            
|Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer
and President

Date:
August 6, 2010
Exhibit 99.1Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmTo the directors and shareholders of Wellman International LimitedWe have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Wellman International Limited andSubsidiaries (“the company”) as of 31 December 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, shareholders’ equity and other comprehensive (loss)/income, and cashflows for each of the years in the three year period ended 31 December 2006. These consolidatedfinancial statements are the responsibility of the company’s management. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting OversightBoard (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtainreasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Anaudit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in thefinancial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used andsignificant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statementpresentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in allmaterial respects, the financial position of Wellman International Limited and Subsidiaries as of31 December 2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of theyears in the three year period ended 31 December 2006, in conformity with accounting principlesgenerally accepted in the United States of America.As discussed in Note 1 (m) to the consolidated financial statements, the company voluntarilychanged its accounting principle for recognising net actuarial gains or losses relating to itsdefined benefit plans.We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting OversightBoard (United States), the effectiveness of Wellman International Limited’s internal control overfinancial reporting as of 31 December 2006, based on criteria established in “Internal Control —Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organisations of the TreadwayCommission (COSO) and our report dated 13 March 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion onmanagement’s assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financialreporting.13 March 2007*/s/ KPMG*
rendering its decision. Int'l Game Tech., 124 Nev. at 197, 179 P.3d at 558; 

see Saavedra-Sandoval, 126 Nev. at 595-96, 245 P.3d at 1200-01 

(explaining that the good-cause determinations under NRCP 4(i) are 

within the district court's discretion). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

Gibbons 

PO& 

Pickering 

cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge 

Thorndal Armstrong Delk Balkenbush & Eisinger/Las Vegas 

Richard Harris Law Firm 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) I947A ceo
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 130 (Thursday, July 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 32961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16293]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated June 26, 2007, and published in the Federal 
Register on July 3, 2007 (72 FR 36481), Johnson Matthey Inc., 
Pharmaceutical Materials, 2003 Nolte Drive, West Deptford, New Jersey 
08066, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of Coca Leaves 
(9040), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to import the listed controlled substance to 
manufacture bulk Cocaine HCL for sale to finished dosage form 
manufacturers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a) and determined that the 
registration of Johnson Matthey Inc. to import the basic class of 
controlled substance is consistent with the public interest and with 
United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or 
protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated 
Johnson Matthey Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is 
consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included 
inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, 
verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and 
a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant 
to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, 
the above named company is granted registration as an importer of the 
basic class of controlled substance listed.

    Dated: June 24, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-16293 Filed 7-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 131 (Friday, July 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16304]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Bureau of Prisons


Annual Determination of Average Cost of Incarceration

AGENCY: Bureau of Prisons, Justice.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The fee to cover the average cost of incarceration for Federal 
inmates in Fiscal Year 2008 was $25,895. The average annual cost to 
confine an inmate in a Community Corrections Center for Fiscal Year 
2008 was $23,882.

DATES: Effective Date: July 10, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Office of General Counsel, Federal Bureau of Prisons, 320 
First St., NW., Washington, DC 20534.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Qureshi, (202) 307-2105.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 28 CFR part 505 allows for assessment and 
collection of a fee to cover the average cost of incarceration for 
Federal inmates. We calculate this fee by dividing the number 
representing Bureau facilities' monetary obligation (excluding 
activation costs) by the number of inmate-days incurred for the 
preceding fiscal year, and then by multiplying the quotient by 365.
    Under Sec.  505.2, the Director of the Bureau of Prisons determined 
that, based upon fiscal year 2008 data, the fee to cover the average 
cost of incarceration for Federal inmates in Fiscal Year 2008 was 
$25,895. In addition, the average annual cost to confine an inmate in a 
Community Corrections Center for Fiscal Year 2008 was $23,882.

Harley G. Lappin,
Director, Bureau of Prisons.
[FR Doc. E9-16304 Filed 7-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-05-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE**

**OFFICEROF GENERAL PARTNER OF HILAND HOLDINGS GP, LP**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection withthe accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for three months endedSeptember 30, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Randy Moeder, Chief Executive Officer andPresident of Hiland Partners GP Holdings, LLC, the general partner of HilandHoldings GP, LP (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.               Theinformation contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: November 13, 2006 | ** ** | /s/ Randy Moeder                      |   |
|-------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |       | Randy Moeder                          |
|                    |       | Chief Executive Officer and President |

 

1

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30602 Summary Calendar

PAUL O. IWENJIORA, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-2899

- - - - - - - - - - December 2, 1997 Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Federal immigration detainee Paul O. Iwenjiora, no. 09915- 265, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and request for a stay or suspension of deportation for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Iwenjiora does not argue whether the district court erred by dismissing his federal habeas petition due to lack ofNo. 97-30602 -2- jurisdiction and for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, which is the only proper issue for appeal. See Searcy v. Houston Lighting & Power Co. , 907 F.2d 562, 564 (5th Cir. 1990). Rather, Iwenjiora argues on appeal the merits of the issues he raised in his originally filed petition. Because Iwenjiora does not address the proper issue for review, he has abandoned it. See Brinkmann v. Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Because Iwenjiora fails to address the proper issue for appeal, his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Iwenjiora that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Iwenjiora is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
EXHIBIT 23



                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  333-30604)  pertaining  to the  Non-Statutory  Stock  Option  Plan  for
Directors and the Stock  Incentive Plan of the Franklin  Holding  Corporation of
our  report  dated  March 5, 2004  (except  for Note 13, as to which the date is
March 19,  2004),  with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
financial  highlights  of Franklin  Capital  Corporation  (formerly The Franklin
Holding  Corporation)  in the  Annual  Report  (Form  10-K)  for the year  ended
December 31, 2003.


                                                     ERNST & YOUNG LLP


New York, New York
March 30, 2004
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00199-CR

Andy Torres Ramos

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas

Trial Cause No. S-13-3236-CR

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 23, 2015
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

:

NINA MORRA, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-59 (MLC)

:

Plaintiff, : O P I N I O N

:

v. :

:

BANK OF AMERICA, et al., :

:

Defendants. :

 :

THE CLERK OF THE COURT has entered default in favor of the

plaintiff and against the defendant McCaffrey Properties (“MCP”). 

(See unnumbered dkt. entry following dkt. entry no. 10.) In

addition, the Court has entered judgment by default on the issue

of liability in favor of the plaintiff and against MCP. (See

dkt. entry no. 17, 12-16-11 Order.) The plaintiff’s claims

against the other defendants have been resolved. (See dkt. entry

no. 19, 1-5-12 Order.)

THE PLAINTIFF now moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure (“Rule”) 55(b)(2) for entry of judgment by default on

the issue of damages in her favor and against MCP. (See dkt.

entry no. 20, Notice of Mot.) The plaintiff has submitted proof

of her damages in support of the motion. (See dkt. entry no. 20,

Pl. Affidavit of Proof.)

MCP has not opposed the motion, even though the return date

was more than two weeks ago. The motion will be granted. The

Case 3:11-cv-00059-MLC -LHG Document 21 Filed 03/09/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 152
Court notes that MCP has an avenue available to it to contest the

entry of judgment against it, if appropriate. See Fed.R.Civ.P.

55(c) (stating court “may set aside a default judgment under Rule

60(b)”); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) (setting forth grounds for

relief from final judgment). For good cause appearing, the Court

will issue an appropriate order and judgment.

 s/ Mary L. Cooper 

MARY L. COOPER

United States District Judge

Dated: March 9, 2012

2

Case 3:11-cv-00059-MLC -LHG Document 21 Filed 03/09/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 153
----

----

|   | 1. | The      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of and for the period covered by theReport. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Martin Schacker                                             |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Martin      Schacker                                            |   |
|   | Co-Chief      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer |   |
|   | November      16, 2009                                          |   |

----