alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. ___________________

HENRY ANDRE WINZER § IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS §
v. § STATE OF TEXAS § THE STATE OF TEXAS § AUSTIN, TEXAS

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:
NOW COMES, the Appellant, HENRY ANDRE WINZER, and moves for an extension of time to file the Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review in this case, and in support thereof would show the following:

I. a. This case is pending below in the 422nd District Court of Kaufman County, Texas under Cause No. 14-00334-422-F, styled State of Texas v. Henry Andre Winzer. It is also pending in the Dallas Court of Appeals under case number 05-14-01079-CR. b. Appellant was convicted of Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The judgment date was July 30, 2014. On August 18, 2015, the Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. c. The deadline for filing the Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review was September 17, 2015. d. Appellant requests an extension until October 17, 2015, to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. e. The reason for this request is that during the last few weeks counsel has been working on the following: 1. Filing of Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Robert Blake Adams v. William Stephens, Director, TDCJ-ID , with the United States Court of Appeals.
Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review - Page 1 PD-1174-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 9/10/2015 11:40:15 AM Accepted 9/14/2015 12:23:13 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK2. Petition for Discre tionary Review in Todd Allen Reich v. State of Texas , No. PD-1081-15, in the Te x as Court of Criminal Appea ls.
WHEREFORE, PREMI SES CONSI DERED, Appellant respe ctfully pray s that this Motion be g rante d. Respectf ully submitt ed, /s/ Gary

A. Udashe n GARY A. UD ASHEN Texas State Ba

r No. 20369590

SORREL S, UDASHEN & ANTON 2311 Cedar Spring s Road Suite 250 Dallas, Te x as 75201 214-468-8100 214-468-8104 f

ax
ATTORNEY F OR APPEL L ANT

CERTIFIC ATE OF SERVICE

The undersig ned here by cer tifies that a true and corr ect copy of the fore g oing Motion for Ex tension of Time to File Appellant’s Petition for Discre tionar y Re v ie w w a s e le ctronica lly delivere d to the Kauf

man County District Attorney ’s Offic e, 100 W. Mulberry , Kauf man, Texas 75142, and t o t h e State Prosecuting Attorney , P. O. Box 12405, Austin, Texas 78711, on this the 10 t h d ay o f September, 2015.

/s/ Gar y A. Udashen GARY A. UD ASHEN

M ot ion f or Ex tension o f Tim e to File A ppellant’s P etitio n fo r Discret ionar y Re view - Pag e 2
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1628]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

January 16, 2009.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for emergency review, and 
it has been approved under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public 
Law 104-13. To allow interested persons to comment on this information 
collection, the Department is publishing this notice and plans to 
submit a request for a three-year extension of OMB's approval. Copies 
of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
11020, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before March 30, 2009 
to be assured of consideration.

Office of Financial Stability

    OMB Number: 1505-0210.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) Capital Purchase 
Program (CPP) Monthly Survey.
    Description: Authorized under the Emergency Economic Stabilization 
Act (EESA) of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-343), the Department of the Treasury 
has implemented several aspects of the Troubled Asset Relief Program. 
Among these components is a voluntary Capital Purchase Program (CPP) 
under which the Department may purchase qualifying capital in U.S. 
banking organizations. The Treasury invested capital through this 
program in over 250 financial institutions. As part of this program, 
Treasury would like to track how the capital is being used, and whether 
these capital injections are having the desired effect of ensuring 
liquidity within the banking system and thereby increasing lending 
activity. The Treasury will be conducting evaluations using quarterly 
Call Report data supplied by these financial institutions to their 
primary regulator. However, in order to have a more frequent and timely 
snapshot of the current lending environment, Treasury is requesting the 
ability to conduct a monthly survey of the 20 largest institutions by 
loans outstanding in order to supplement the quarterly analysis.
    Respondents: Businesses and other for-profit institutions.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 12,000 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Suzanne Tosini, Treasury Office of Financial 
Stability, 1801 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220, (202) 927-9627.

Robert Dahl,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-1628 Filed 1-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-P
#### LAZAR v. CECELIA CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

June 13, 1939.

LEIBELL, District Judge.

I have read and studied the affidavits and exhibits submitted by the parties on this motion made by defendant to quash the service of the process herein. The papers before me definitely raise issues of fact, as to the manner and extent to which the defendant corporation was doing business in the State of New York at the time process was served in this action. There is a further issue as to whether the summons was served on a proper representative of the defendant under the new Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 4 (d) (3) and (7), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, assuming defendant was doing business here.

These issues arise under subdivision “2” of the notice of motion, reading as follows: “2. To dismiss the action or in lieu thereof to quash the return of service of summons on the ground (a) that the defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of Illinois and was not and is not subject to service of process within the Southern District of New York, and (b) that the defendant has not been properly served with process in this action,

It is difficult to determine these issues from the affidavits submitted, which contain conflicting statements. I am of the opinion that the issues of fact under said subdivision “2” of the notice of motion should be referred to a Special Master to hear such proof respecting the same as the parties may submit, and to make due report to this Court of his findings of fact and conclusions of law. For that purpose those issues are referred to George A. Spohr, Jr., of 51 Chambers Street, New York City, as Special Master to hear and report with all convenient speed.

Decision is reserved by the Court in respect to subdivisions “1,” “3” and *“4”*of the notice of motion, until the coming in of the Special Master’s report on subdivision “2”.

Submit, on notice, a proposed order for the reference directed by this memorandum.
ImmuCell Corporation

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of ImmuCell Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2011, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael F. Brigham, President, Chief
Executive Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.



This certification is
provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (Item 601(b)(32)) promulgated under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). In accordance
with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section
18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates
it by reference.



|/s/ Michael F. Brigham                           | 
|------------------------------------------------ | 
|Michael F. Brigham                               | 
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer | 
|January 8, 2013                                  | 



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to ImmuCell Corporation and will be retained by ImmuCell Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
41:1t.CJA 20 APPOINTMENT OF AND AUTHORITY TO PAY COURT APPOINTED COUNSEL 

I. CIR./DIST./ DIY. CODE 

0312 

3. MAG. DKT./DEF. NUMBER 

7. IN CASE/MATTER OF (Case Name) 

U.S.A. v. DEPIRO, et al 

VOUCHER NUMBER 

5. APPEALS DKT./DEF. NUMBER 

9. TYPE PERSON REPRESENTED 

x Adult Defendant 0 Appellant 

0 Juvenile Defendant 0 Appellee 

Other 

6. OTHER DKT. NUMBER 

10. REPRESENTATION TYPE 

(See Instructions) 

cc 

II. OFFENSE(S) CHARGED (Cite U.S. Code, Title & Section) If more than one offense, list (up to five) major offenses charged, according to severity of offense. 

18:1951(a) & 2 EXTORTION 

12. ATTORNEY'S NAME (First Name, M.l., Last Name, including any sujfu), 

AND MAILING ADDRESS 

MICHAEL PEDICINI, Esq 

60 Washington Street 

Morristown, NJ 07960 

Telephone Number: 973-285-1555 

13. COURT ORDER 

X 0 Appointing Counsel 

D F Subs For Federal Defender 

D P Subs For Panel Attorney 

Prior Attorney's 

D C Co-Counsel 

DR Subs For Retained Attorney 

D Y Standby Counsel 

Appointment Dates: ------------- 0 Because the above-named person represented has testified under oath or has otherwise 

satisfied this Court that he or e (I) is financially unable to employ counsel and (2) does not 

wish to waive counsel, an ause the interests of justice so require, the attorney whose 

1-1-4-. -N-AME--A-ND~-MA---IL ... IN....,..G_AD ___ D'""R'""E_S_s'""o ___ F_L_A_,W....,..F-IRM--(O_n_l~y-p-ro-v-id_e_p-er-,-.n-st_ru_c_ti-on_s_) -~ name appears in It I ts pointed to represent this person in this case, OR 

D Other (See st eli s) 

27 September 2012 25 July 2012 

Date of Order Nunc Pro Tunc Date 

Repayment or partial repayment ordered from the person represented for this service at time 

appointment. 0 YES 0 NO 

CATEGORIES (Attach itemization of services with dates) 

19. 21. CASE DISPOSITION 

TO: 

22. CLAIM STATUS D Final Payment D Interim Payment Number D Supplemental Payment 

Have you previously applied to the court for compensation and/or reimbursement for this ~ YES 0 NO If yes, were you paid? D YES D NO 

Other than from the Court, have you, or to your knowledge has anyone else, received payment (compensation or anything of value) from any other source in connection with this 

representation? 0 YES 0 NO If yes, give details on additional sheets. 

I swear or affirm the truth or correctness of the above statements. 

Date 

27. TOTAL AMT. APPR./CERT. 

28. SIGNATURE OF THE PRESIDING JUDICIAL OFFICER DATE 28a. JUDGE/MAG. JUDGE CODE 

29. IN COURT COMP. 30. OUT OF COURT COMP. 31. TRAVEL EXPENSES 32. OTHER EXPENSES 33. TOTAL AMT. APPROVED 

1,1 <:;V!Nf.llJRE OF CH!FF .lli!JGL COIJRT OF ;\PPEt\1." tOR Dr;! FG!\TE) l'mm''"' rmr•rmvd 

Case 2:10-cr-00851-CCC Document 243 Filed 09/27/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 2507
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



       REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM AND CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Komag, Incorporated:

The audits referred to in our report dated March 7, 2005, included the related
financial statement schedule as of January 2, 2005 and December 28, 2003 and for
the years then ended and the six-month periods ended December 29, 2002 and June
30, 2002. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this
financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Numbers
333-107261, 333-101125 and 333-116591) on Form S-8 and (333-110182 and
333-98785) on Form S-3 of Komag, Incorporated, of our report dated March 7,
2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Komag, Incorporated and
subsidiaries as of January 2, 2005 and December 28, 2003 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
the years then ended and the six-month periods ended December 29, 2002 and June
30, 2002, and management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting as of January 2, 2005, and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2005, which reports
appear in the January 2, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Komag, Incorporated.

Our report dated March 7, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Komag, Incorporated, contains two explanatory paragraphs. The
first paragraph states that effective as of the beginning, of the 2002 fiscal
year, Komag, Incorporated adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142, GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS. The second
paragraph states that Komag, Incorporated's plan of reorganization under Chapter
11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code became effective on June 30, 2002. As a
result of the adoption of "fresh-start" reporting in accordance with Statement
of Position 90-7, FINANCIAL REPORTING BY ENTITIES IN REORGANIZATION UNDER THE
BANKRUPTCY CODE, the consolidated financial statements as of and for the years
ended January 2, 2005 and December 28, 2003 and for the six-month period ended
December 29, 2002 are presented on a different reporting basis than the
six-month period ended June 30, 2002, and are therefore not comparable.

                                                  KPMG LLP


San Francisco, California
March 16, 2005
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - May 2005 

Benefit payments May 2005 May 2004 

Regular Retirement 

and Survivor Benefits 

Total 

Retired employ

Spouses and d

Widow(er)s - a

Other survivors 

ees 

ivorced spouses 

ged and disabled 

$761,960,000 

493,432,000 

90,799,000 

155,423,000 

22,306,000 

$746,693,000 

479,928,000 

89,259,000 

155,734,000 

21,772,000 

Average under 

Being paid Awarded in Social Security 

Monthly benefits end of month month May 2005 

Number Average1 Number Average1 Being Paid Awarded 

Total 599,800 ......... 2,300 ......... ......... .........

Regular employee annuities, total 284,500 $1,718 900 $2,161 ......... .........

 Age 200,700 1,677 2 200 2 2,730 $958 3 $1,126

 Disability, Full Retirement Age and Over 34,800 1,532 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Disability, Under Full Retirement Age 49,000 2,016 400 2,244 896 959 

Spouses and divorced spouses 140,500 640 700 741 465 331 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 147,000 1,053 600 1,379 908 738 

Widowed mothers and fathers 1,000 1,350 4/ 1,185 687 684 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 14,700 698 100 804 5/ 5/ 

Children 12,100 792 100 976 629 628 

Other survivors 100 747 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Benefit payments 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

May 

2005 

$5,133,000 

May 

2004 

$5,340,000 

Number 

123,800 

Average 

$42 

Number 

300 

Average 

$41 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement. 

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 34); some 200

 other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis. 

4

Fewer than 50. 

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers. 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding 

Regular retirement and survivor benefit payments total includes hospital insurance benefits for services in Canada. 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

May 2005 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Average payment 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period

 Per

 full week 

Unemployment 2,000 $471 $273 

Sickness 5,500 484 

May 2005 

Benefit payments 

278 

May 2004 

Unemployment

Total 

1,800,000 

$5,473,000 $3,696,000

1,708,000 

Sickness 3,673,000 1,988,000 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited). Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.

 Recycled

 Paper 

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

 Case No. 5D23-3168

LT Case No. 2008-CF-010573-C

_____________________________

RAYDEL ALVAREZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

3.800 appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County.

Robert Segal, Judge.

Raydel Alvarez, Century, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

January 19, 2024

PER CURIAM.

This Court previously dismissed Appellant’s petition for writ 

of habeas corpus and affirmed the trial court’s order denying 

Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief in Brevard County 

Circuit Court Case No. 2008-CF-010573-C. Because it appears 

that Appellant’s postconviction filings are abusive, repetitive, 

malicious, or frivolous, Appellant is cautioned that any further pro 

se filings in this Court, asserting claims stemming from Brevard
2

County Circuit Court Case No. 2008-CF-010573-C, may result in 

sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral 

to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include 

forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2023); State v. 

Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

APPELLANT CAUTIONED.

MAKAR, BOATWRIGHT, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONBY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Pinnacle Gas Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending September 30,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Peter G. Schoonmaker, President and Chief Executive Officerof the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  November 14,  2008 |                                  |
|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                |                                  |
|                                | /s/ Peter  G. Schoonmaker             |
|                                | Peter G. Schoonmaker                  |
|                                | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Susser Holdings Corporation (the Company) for the three months ended
April 4, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sam L. Susser, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 14, 2010



/s/ Sam L. SusserSam L. SusserPresident and Chief Executive Officer


This
certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# table58_q8_naics
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000512

10-AUG-2017

03:06 PM
Case 2:10-cv-06637-CCC-JAD Document 2 Filed 12/29/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 14
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ronald W. Thiessen, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Quartz Mountain Resources Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i)      the
Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended July 31,
2015 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)      the
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
    November 25, 2015/s/  Ronald W. ThiessenBy:
    Ronald W. ThiessenTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer


This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---