alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RULES GOVERNING STANDARDS OF CONDUCT

OF MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JUDGES

Preamble

*** ( 8 ) The [ Ethics Committee of the Pennsylvania Conference of State Trial Judges and the Ethics and Professionalism Committee of the Special Court Judges

Association of Pennsylvania are ] Pennsylvania Judicial Ethics Advisory Board is designated as the approved [ bodies] body to render advisory opinions and general guidance regarding ethical concerns involving magisterial district judges and judicial candidates subject to t he Conduct Rules. [ Although such opinions are not, per se, binding upon the Judicial Conduct Board, the Court of Judicial Discipline or the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, a ] A ction taken in reliance thereon and pursuant

thereto shall be [ taken into account ] treated as set forth in Rule s 103 and 20 6 of the Pennsylvania Judicial Ethics Advisory Board in determining whether discipline should be recommended or imposed. [ It is anticipated that ethical concerns directed to the Ethics Committee of the Pennsylvani a Conference of State Trial Judges would be limited to matters more appropriately before that body, e.g., campaigning for election to the court of common pleas or an appellate court. ]

***
#### Holmes Electric Protective Co. *v.*Metropolitan Burglar Alarm Co.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York*

July 14, 1887.)

Patents for Inventions—Injunction—Dissolving.

Where a preliminary injunction, restraining the infringement, of a patent, has been allowed to stand for three years, and it is within the power of the parties to bring the cause to final hearing, the court will allow the injunction to remain until such hearing, and will deny a motion to dissolve it, which is made on the ground that the invention of the patent in controversy was described in a prior patent to the same inventor, and that a certain authority was not before the court when the injunction was granted.

In Equity.

*Samuel A. Duncan,*for plaintiff.

*G. G.*Frelinghuysen, for defendant.

Wheeler, J.

The preliminary injunction granted herein has stood nearly three years. Motion is now made to dissolve *it*on *the ground*that the invention of this patent was described in a prior patent to the same inventor, and on the authority of *Mahn*v. *Harwood,*112 U. S. 354, *5*Sup. Ct. Rep. 174, which was not before the court when the injunction was granted. The question involved was argued in *Butterworth*v. *Hill,*114 U. S. 128, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 796, and is said not to have been considered, as the case was disposed of on other grounds. Since then the question has been very fully considered, and the authorities, including *Mahn*v. *Harwood,*reviewed in *Eastern Paper-Bag Co.*v. *Standard Paper-Bag Co.,*30 Fed Rep. 63. The conclusion was there reached that such description in a prior patent does not, of itself alone, invalidate a subsequent patent for the invention so described, applied for in due season. Upon this state of the authorities, and in view of the long time during which the injunction has been in force, and the readiness with which the cause may be brought to final hearing, it is deemed best that the injunction should remain until that time. Motion denied.
| **Exhibit No. 32.1**                          |  |
|-----------------------------------------------|--|
| Form 10-Q                                     |  |
| Marketing Acquisition Corporation             |  |
| File No. 0-52072                              |  |
|                                               |  |
| **Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,** |  |
| **as adopted Pursuant to Section 906**        |  |
| **of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 -**       |  |
| **Chief Executive and Financial Officer**     |  |

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing Acquisition Corporation (Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Timothy P. Halter, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  |   |   |  |   |   |   | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |   |   |
|--|--------|--------|--|--------|--------|--------|-----|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|  |        |        |  |        |        |        |     |  |                                                                                                                                                |        |        |
|  |   |   |  |   |   |   | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |   |   |

| Dated: April 28, 2009 |   |   | By:/s/ Timothy P. Halter    |   |   |
|-----------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|--------|
|                       |   |   | Timothy P. Halter           |   |   |
|                       |   |   | Chief Executive Officer and |   |   |
|                       |   |   | Chief Financial Officer     |   |   |

----

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Marketing Acquisition Corporation and will be retained by Marketing Acquisition Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered July 22, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01622-CV

KAREN HOUSTON, ET AL., Appellants

V.

JERRY KIRCHMAN & ASSOCIATES, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 81,238

ORDER

Appellants’ brief is past due. Before the Court is the July 9, 2015 pro se motion of 

appellants Karen Houston and Houston Northshore Peninsula, Ltd. seeking an extension to “hire 

another attorney or prepare pro se.” In the motion, appellants state that their attorney, Teresa 

Robbins, has informed them that she will not handle their appeal. However, Ms. Robbins has not 

filed a motion to withdraw with this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5. Accordingly, Ms. Robbins 

is still the attorney of record for appellants. Accordingly, the Court takes no action on 

appellants’ pro se motion.

On the Court’s own motion, we ORDER appellants to file a brief WITHIN FORTYFIVE DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A0 80 6

. MANUEL LOZ ANO v

. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON et

a l

.

M an u el Lo zan o fi l ed a co m p lai n t s eek i n g a d ecl arat o ry ju d g m en t p ert ai n i n g to

real p ro p ert y

. A l o n g wi t h t he co m p l ai n t

, L o zan o fi l ed

, p u rs u an t t o OCGA § 9 -1 1 -6 5

(b ), a “ M o t i o n fo r an E x Part e Tem p o rary Res t rai n in g Ord er an d fo r an In t erl o cu t o ry

In ju nct i on , ” s eek i n g t o m ai n t ai n t h e st at u s q u o wi t h reg ard t o t h e pro p ert y

. Th e t ri al

co u rt d en i ed th e m ot i o n wi t h ou t a h eari n g

. On Oct o b er 5, 2 0 1 7

, t h e d efen d an t s

rem o v ed t h e c a s e t o fed eral co u rt

. On Oct o b er 9, 20 1 7

, Lo zan o fi l ed a n o t i ce o f

ap p eal s ee k i n g t o ap peal th e o rd er d en y i ng h is req ues t fo r a t em p o rary res t rai n i n g

o rd er. Two o f t h e d efen d an t s h av e fi l ed a m o t i o n t o d i s m i s s Lo zan o ’ s ap p eal

. Pret erm it t i n g wh et h er t h e t ri al co u r t l o s t ju ri s d i ct i on u p o n rem o val t o t h e

fed eral co u rt

, t h e tri al co u rt ’ s o rd er d en i es a req u es t o f a t em p o rary res t rai ni n g o rd er.

Co n s eq u en t l y , Lo zan o was req u i red t o fi l e an ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal to

o b t a i n ap p el l at e rev i ew. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (9 ). See al so Do l in g er v. Dr ive r , 2 6 9 Ga. 1 4 1

, 1 4 2 (1 ) (4 9 8 SE2 d 2 5 2 ) (1 9 9 8 ). Lo zan o ’ s fai l ure to fo l l o w t h e p ro p er

ap p el l at e p ro ced u re d ep ri ves u s o f ju ri s d ict i on o v er t h i s ap p eal

. Th u s , t h e

d efen d an t s ’ m o t i o n t o d i sm i s s i s GRANTED an d th i s ap peal i s h ereb y D ISM ISSED. January 11, 2018C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 01/11/2018
Case 2:11-cv-00574-SDW-MCA Document 4 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 30
Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CastlePoint Holdings, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, Michael H. Lee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Joel S. Weiner,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Michael H. Lee
------------------
Michael H. Lee
Chief Executive Officer

August 7, 2007




/s/ Joel S. Weiner
------------------
Joel S. Weiner
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

August 7, 2007




                                       41
Exhibit 32.1

 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB,
Amendment No. 3, of Velocity Asset Management, Inc. for the period ended
December 31, 2004, I, John C. Kleinert, President and Chief Executive Officer,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

1.   Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, Amendment No. 3, for the year ended
     December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, Amendment
     No. 3, for the year ended December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Velocity Asset Management, Inc.



                                       VELOCITY ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.



Dated: July 22, 2005                   By: /s/ JOHN C. KLEINERT
                                           -------------------------------------
                                          John C. Kleinert, President and
                                          Chief Executive Officer
Case 3:10-mj-04528-LHG   Document 5   Filed 12/30/10   Page 1 of 3 PageID: 5

Case 3:10-mj-04528-LHG   Document 5   Filed 12/30/10   Page 2 of 3 PageID: 6

Case 3:10-mj-04528-LHG   Document 5   Filed 12/30/10   Page 3 of 3 PageID: 7
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1516

DORATHEA PENDERGRASS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GERALD F. LITTLEJOHN; PAUL YATES WHITMAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. William B. Traxler, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-94-1224-6-21)

Submitted: September 17, 1996 Decided: September 30, 1996

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dorathea Pendergrass, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Barron Grier, III,

GRIER LAW FIRM, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

Appellant's Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motion for a new trial. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. We deny Appellant's motion to proceed in forma

pauperis, and affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Pendergrass v. Littlejohn, No. CA-94-1224-6-21 (D.S.C. Feb. 15,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
S05Y0976.

#### IN THE MATTER OF JASON TODD SHWILLER.

(612 SE2d 305)

Decided April 26, 2005.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, K. Gene Chapman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*Edward T. Murray,*for Shwiller.

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on Jason Todd Shwiller’s petition for the voluntary surrender of his license.

Shwiller admits that (1) he is facing an indictment in Fulton County on felony drug charges involving the possession of a large amount of cocaine, (2) he is facing felony drug charges in Douglas County, to which he has agreed to a negotiated guilty plea, (3) after his arrest in Douglas County, he revealed client secrets and confidences to police, (4) he missed scheduled court appearances on behalf of clients due to his being under the influence of illegal substances, (5) he has failed to communicate adequately with clients and opposing counsel due to his being under the influence of illegal substances, (6) he has used illegal substances with clients, and (7) he has obtained illegal substances from clients. He admits that these actions violated Rules 1.3, 1.6, and 1.7 (a) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, see Bar Rule 4-102 (d), and that the maximum penalty for the violations is disbarment.

We have reviewed the record and agree to accept Shwiller’s petition for voluntary surrender of his law license, which is tantamount to disbarment, see Bar Rule 4-110 (f). Accordingly, the name of Jason Todd Shwiller is hereby removed from the rolls of persons entitled to practice law in the State of Georgia. Shwiller is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Voluntary surrender of license accepted.*

*All the Justices concur.*
# table71_q9.3_state
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONOF CEO PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

 

I,James F. Smith, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

 

1.                                       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc.and its Subsidiaries (the “Registrant”);

 

2.                                       Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report; and

 

3.                                       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this annual report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport.

 

----

 
|                      |   | /s/ James F. Smith                                                       |   |
|---------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated: September 15, 2006 |   | James F. Smith,   Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-10818

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JEFF CARLTON NOEBEL,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:14-CR-450-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jeff Carlton Noebel

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Noebel has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-10818 Document: 00513472140 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
No. 15-10818

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-10818 Document: 00513472140 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000813347
<NAME>                        KOMAG, INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-03-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         133,897
<SECURITIES>                                    32,300
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,313
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,424
<INVENTORY>                                     66,778
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               371,689
<PP&E>                                       1,082,394
<DEPRECIATION>                                 403,798
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,084,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,590
<BONDS>                                        245,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           528
<OTHER-SE>                                     685,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,084,664
<SALES>                                        631,082
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               631,082
<CGS>                                          537,536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  537,536
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,513
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,286
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (37,820)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (20,982)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (22,103)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (22,103)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.42)
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tanya Frederick, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 449]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael A. Corriero, J.), rendered December 3, 2004, convicting defendant, upon her *543plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing her, as a juvenile offender, to a term of IV2 to 4V2 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant youthful offender treatment *(People v Drayton,*39 NY2d 580 [1976]), particularly in light of her postplea criminal conduct. Concur—Andrias, J.E, Marlow, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
February 28, 2010 of Kayne Anderson Energy Development Company;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   Date: April 9, 2010
    
    /s/ Terry A. Hart

Terry A. HartChief Financial Officer
**31.1
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

           I, Lisa Norman, certify that:

     1)   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of American Home Alliance Corporation.

     2)   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.

     3)   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results from operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

By:  /s/ Lisa Norman****