alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10** 
**- 1564** 

BILLY K. CRUEY; B. K. CRUEY, PC ,
Plaintiffs

– Appellants ,

v.

RICKY LEE EARLY; HOWARD M. GREGORY; ERIC NESTER; ELINOR E. WILLIAMS, as Magistrate and Agent for the C ounty of Montgomery, Virginia; KAREN SUE GARNAND, Magistrate and Agent for the County of Montgomery, Virginia ,
Defendants

– Appellees,

and
STEPHEN C. HUFF, JR.; R. J. KIRBY, Individually, and as Deputy Sheriff, and as agent for J. T. Whitt, Sheri ff, and Montgomery County, Virginia; D. L. CONNER, Individually, and as Deputy Sheriff, and as agent for J. T. Whitt, Sheriff, and Montgomery County, Virginia; J. T. WHITT, Individually, and as Sheriff, Montgomery County, Virginia, and as agent for Montgom ery County, Virginia; ROGER DALE NESTER; BRUCE W. NESTER; COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, VIRGINIA ,
Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. ( 7:09

- cv
- 0 0516

- gec )

Submitted : September 28, 2010 Decided: September 30, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.2 Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Billy K. Cruey, B. K. CRUEY, PC, Shawsville, Virginia, for Appellants. Matthe w E. Kelley, FRITH, ANDERSON & PEAKE, PC, Roanoke, Virginia ; Isak Jordan Howell, Mark Douglas Loftis, WOODS ROGERS, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia; Christy Monolo, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opin ions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Billy K. Cruey , acting on behalf of himself and his

law firm, B

. K. Cruey, PC , seek s to appeal the district court’s

orders dismiss ing some, but not all , defendants and den ying his

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) motion. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (200 6 ),
and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (200 6 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 5 45

- 46 (1949). The order s that Cruey
seeks to appeal are neither final order s nor are they appealable
interlocutory or collateral order s
. See McCall v. Deeds ,
849 F.2d 1259, 1259 (9th Cir. 1988) (“[T]he denial of Rule 54(b)
certification is not appealable .”); Robinson v. Parke

- Davis

& Co. , 685 F.2d 912, 913 (4th Cir. 1982) (holding that dismissal
of some, but not all, claims or parties not immediately
appealable absent Rule 54(b) certification). A ccordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Order entered January 29, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00403-CV

PROFINITY, LLC, Appellant

V.

ONE TECHNOLOGIES, L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-03980-A

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee/cross-appellant’s January 26, 2015, unopposed motion to 

extend time to file reply brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellee/cross-appellant’s 

brief be filed no later than March 2, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Case 2:10-cr-00422-FSH Document 15 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 35
Case 2:10-cr-00422-FSH Document 15 Filed 06/21/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 36
EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 Nos. 333-07415 and 333-68935) of Boddie-Noell Properties, Inc. of our
report dated January 7, 2000 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Boddie-Noell Properties, Inc. included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.






                                           /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP




Raleigh, North Carolina
March 23, 2000
# table70_q9.3_naics
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Cameron Durrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

|1. | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PediatRx Inc. for
      the period ended November 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|2. | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of PediatRx Inc.                                                              

January 13, 2011

| | /s/
      Cameron Durrant                      
| | -----------------------------------------------
| | Cameron Durrant                                
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
| | (Principal Executive Officer)                  

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1074 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1074

      To reinstate Federal Pell Grant eligibility for individuals 
  incarcerated in Federal and State penal institutions, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 9, 2019

   Mr. Schatz (for himself, Mr. Lee, and Mr. Durbin) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To reinstate Federal Pell Grant eligibility for individuals 
  incarcerated in Federal and State penal institutions, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restoring Education And Learning Act 
of 2019'' or the ``REAL Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF FEDERAL PELL GRANT ELIGIBILITY.

    Section 401(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1070a(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (6);
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (7) as paragraph (6); and
            (3) in paragraph (2)(A)(ii), by striking ``(7)(B)'' and 
        inserting ``(6)(B)''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 2 shall be effective for academic 
year 2019-2020 and succeeding academic years.
                                 <all>
```
# table200_q21_state
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-60645

Summary Calendar

__________________

FRANCIS DIBI KOFFI,

Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

______________________________________________

Petition for Review of an Order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A73-764-311

______________________________________________

July 31, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Francis Dibi Koffi appeals the Board of Immigration Appeal’s

(BIA) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision to deny

asylum, withholding of deportation, and voluntary departure. After

reviewing the record and the briefs, we deny the petition for the
2

following reasons:

1. There is substantial evidence to support the BIA’s

determination that Koffi did not suffer either past

persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution.

And because Koffi has not shown that he can prevail under

the lesser well-founded fear of persecution standard

applicable to his eligibility for political asylum, he

cannot prevail under the higher clear-probability-ofpersecution standard applicable to withholding of

deportation.

2. Koffi’s assertion that he is eligible for voluntary

departure is without merit. Koffi was convicted of a

crime of moral turpitude within five years of his

application for voluntary departure. Accordingly, Koffi

is not eligible for voluntary departure. See 8 U.S.C. §

1254(e); id. § 1101(f)(3); id. § 1182(a)(9).

Petition for Review DENIED.
(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report), filed with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
  /s/ Robert G. CostantiniRobert G. CostantiniExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-1670

___________________________

Guillermo Quinones

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena

____________

 Submitted: September 17, 2014

Filed: September 23, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Guillermo Quinones appeals the district court’s1

 order dismissing his action

under the Federal Tort Claims Act for lack of jurisdiction. After careful review, see

1

The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Joe

J. Volpe, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Appley Bros. v. United States, 164 F.3d 1164, 1169-70 (8th Cir. 1999) (findings of

fact are reviewed for clear error and application of law is reviewed de novo), we agree

with the district court that Quinones failed to timely present his claim to the Bureau

of Prisons, and thus dismissal was proper. See 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b); Motley v. United

States, 295 F.3d 820, 822 (8th Cir. 2002); K.E.S. v. United States, 38 F.3d 1027, 1030

(8th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny

Quinones’s appellate motion.

______________________________

-2-
#### Khalid ELHASSAN, Appellant v. Porter GOSS, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency; Central Intelligence Agency; Agent Travis Close; Agent Patrick Eager; Agent Wanda Mitchell; Agent “Eric”; John Doe and Jane Doe 1-10, such names being ficticious.

No. 07-1407.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) April 8, 2008.

April 11, 2008.

Khalid A. Elhassan, Edison, NJ, pro se.

Susan Handler-Menahem, Office of United States Attorney, Newark, NJ, for Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.

Before SMITH, HARDIMAN, and COWEN, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT ORDER

D. BROOKS SMITH, Circuit Judge.

On January 30, 2007, in a comprehensive opinion, the District Court for the District of New Jersey granted summary judgment in favor of appellees and against appellant on his claims of constitutional violations and his numerous tort claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act. This timely appeal1 came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and was submitted on April 8, 2008. On consideration thereof, and substantially for the reasons set forth by the District Court, it is now ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court entered on January 30, 2007, be and the same hereby is AFFIRMED. All of the above in accordance with the opinion of this Court. Costs taxed against the appellant.

1

. Appellate jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We exercise plenary review over a District Court’s grant of a motion for summary judgment. *Shuman ex rel Shertzer v. Penn Manor School District,*422 F.3d 141, 146 (3d Cir.2005).
"EMPLOYEE"



ONE PRICE CLOTHING STORES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<S>                                                                <C>                   <C>                      <C> 
                                                                                         Fiscal Year Ended
                                                                    -------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                       January 30,           January 31,           February 1,
                                                                           1999                 1998                  1997
                                                                    -------------------   ------------------    ------------------
BASIC INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                       10,437,102          10,435,531            10,400,789
                                                                    ==================     ===============            ==========
Net income (loss)                                                    $      4,383,000      $  (11,320,000)         $ (1,267,000)
                                                                    =================      ===============          ============
Basic net income (loss) per common share                             $           0.42      $        (1.08)         $      (0.12)
                                                                     ===============       ==============          =============


DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                       10,437,102          10,435,531            10,400,789

Net effect of dilutive stock options based on the treasury
  stock method using the average market price                                  56,714                  --                    --
                                                                    -------------------   ------------------    ----------------

Total                                                                      10,493,816          10,435,531            10,400,789
                                                                    ==================    =================     ===============

Net income (loss)                                                $          4,383,000    $    (11,320,000)  $        (1,267,000)
                                                                    =================    =================     =================
                                                                            
Diluted net income (loss) per common share                       $               0.42               (1.08)               (0.12)
                                                                    =================    =================     ================= 
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-2299

JAMES D. SULLIVAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 11738-20L)

Submitted: April 26, 2022 Decided: April 28, 2022

Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James D. Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Lauren E. Hume, Jacob Earl Christensen, Regina 

Sherry Moriarty, Tax Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James D. Sullivan appeals from the tax court’s order granting summary judgment 

in favor of the Commissioner and allowing the proposed levy action to proceed. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the tax court. Sullivan v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, Tax Ct. No. 11738-20L

(U.S. Tax Ct. Aug. 4, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 2:10-cr-00851-CCC Document 209 Filed 06/04/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 2104
Case 2:10-cr-00851-CCC Document 209 Filed 06/04/12 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 2105
Case 2:10-cr-00851-CCC Document 209 Filed 06/04/12 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 2106
Case 2:10-cr-00851-CCC Document 209 Filed 06/04/12 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 2107
Case 2:10-cr-00851-CCC Document 209 Filed 06/04/12 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 2108
BLS Technical Advisory Committee 

June 21, 2019 

 

9:15 Commissioner’s Welcome and Review of Agency Developments

9:45 Improving Estimates of Hours Worked for U.S. Productivity Measurement

Presenter: Jay Stewart, BLS – Office of Productivity and Technology 

10:15 Break

10:30 Improving Estimates of Hours Worked for U.S. Productivity Measurement (Continued)

Discussants: Aysegul Sahin, University of Texas at Austin

Keith Phillips, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

11:30 Discussion of Future Priorities

12:00 Lunch

1:00 Contingent Worker Supplement

Presenter: Julie Hatch Maxfield, BLS – Office of Employment and Unemployment Statistics

Discussants: David Deming, Harvard Kennedy School

Bruce Meyer, University of Chicago

2:15 Break

2:30 Using Administrative Trade Data to Create Export Price Indexes

Presenters: Susan Fleck, BLS – Office of Prices and Living Conditions

Don Fast, BLS – Office of Prices and Living Conditions

Discussants: Carol Corrado, The Conference Board

Susan Houseman, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research

4:00 Conclusion

Janet Norwood Conference Center · 2 Massachusetts Avenue Northeast · Washington, D.C. 20212
Case 2:11-cv-00582-FSH-MAS Document 24 Filed 05/11/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1061
Case 2:11-cv-00582-FSH-MAS Document 24 Filed 05/11/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1062
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1045 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1045

 To amend the Public Health Service Act to expand the authority of the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services to permit nurses to practice in 
   health care facilities with critical shortages of nurses through 
        programs for loan repayment and scholarships for nurses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 4, 2019

 Mr. Young (for himself and Mr. Jones) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Public Health Service Act to expand the authority of the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services to permit nurses to practice in 
   health care facilities with critical shortages of nurses through 
        programs for loan repayment and scholarships for nurses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nursing Where It's Needed Act'' or 
the ``Nursing WIN Act''.

SEC. 2. SUNSETTING THE PROHIBITION ON ASSIGNMENT OF NURSES TO CERTAIN 
              HEALTH CARE FACILITIES WITH CRITICAL SHORTAGES OF NURSES.

    Section 846(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 297n(a)) 
is amended by striking the last sentence.
                                 <all>
```
| 1. | Such quarterly report of Form      10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in such      quarterly report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, fairly      represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results      of operations of NORTHEAST AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS,  INC. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| NORTHEAST      AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS, INC.                                  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                      |   |
| By:                                                                  | /s/ William Solko |
| William      SolkoChief      Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer |

----
Exhibit 32



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned President and Sole Executive
Officer of the Company, certifies, that to his knowledge:

         1) Ridgefield Acquisition Corp.'s Form 10-KSB for the annual period
         ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2) the information contained in Ridgefield Acquisition Corp.'s Form
         10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31, 2007 fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.



Dated:  March 28, 2008


                                            /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Steven N. Bronson, President