alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
FDS for fiscal year 10K
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,604
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,184
<INVENTORY>                                    183,883
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               304,262
<PP&E>                                       1,313,283
<DEPRECIATION>                                 396,109
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,493,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          253,093
<BONDS>                                        410,679
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                     643,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,493,481
<SALES>                                        968,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               968,008
<CGS>                                          837,718
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  837,718
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,395
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,714
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,681
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,681
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
        

</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF ABINGTON BANCORP, INC.

Abington Bancorp, Inc. has two subsidiaries. Abington Savings Bank (the "Bank"),
is a wholly owned subsidiary which is a Massachusetts-chartered savings bank.
Abington Bancorp Capital Trust is a Delaware business trust whose sole purpose
is to issue capital securities.

The Bank has seven wholly-owned subsidiaries, Holt Park Place Development
Corporation, Norroway Pond Development Corporation, Old Colony Mortgage
Corporation, Mass Securities Corporation and Mass SEC Corp. II which are
Massachusetts Corporations, and Abington Securities Corporation and 70 Quincy
Ave., LLC, which are Delaware Corporations.
Presidential Documents

32047 

Federal Register 

Vol. 74, No. 127 

Monday, July 6, 2009 

Title 3— 

The President 

Executive Order 13510 of July 1, 2009 

Waiver Under the Trade Act of 1974 With Respect to the 

Republic of Belarus 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including subsection 402(c)(2) of 

the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’) (19 U.S.C. 2432(c)(2)), which 

continues to apply to the Republic of Belarus pursuant to subsection 402(d) 

of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2432(d)), and having made the report to the Congress 

set forth in subsection 402(c)(2), I hereby waive the application of subsections 

(a) and (b) of section 402 of the Act with respect to the Republic of Belarus. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

July 1, 2009. 

[FR Doc. E9–16034 

Filed 7–2–09; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3195–W9–P 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES2OB#1.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit 32.01





CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Michael Neufeld, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Pegasi Energy Resources Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Pegasi Energy Resources Corporation.





By:

/s/ MICHAEL NEUFELDDate: August 13, 2009

Name:

Michael NeufeldTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




I, Richard Lindermanis, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Pegasi Energy Resources Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Pegasi Energy Resources Corporation.





By:

/s/ RICHARD LINDERMANISDate: August 13, 2009

Name:

Richard LindermanisTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:10-cv-03345-ES-JAD Document 323 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 7752
Case 2:10-cv-03345-ES-JAD Document 323 Filed 05/30/14 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 7753
Case 2:10-cv-03345-ES-JAD Document 323 Filed 05/30/14 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 7754
Case 2:10-cv-03345-ES-JAD Document 323 Filed 05/30/14 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 7755
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 76 Filed 06/12/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1263
Case 2:11-cv-00296-WJM-MF Document 76 Filed 06/12/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1264
EXHIBIT 11

SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENT SHOWING CALCULATION OF AVERAGE
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING AND EARNINGS
PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE
(in thousands, except per share amounts)


                                      Three Months Ended        Year Ended     
                                       December 30, 1995     December 30, 1995

Weighted average number
     of common shares outstanding             33,075             32,228

Application of the "treasury
     stock" method to the stock option               
     and employee stock purchase plans          920               1,510

Weighted average of common stock
     equivalent shares attributable
     to convertible debentures                  575                607

     Total common and common     
          equivalent shares, assuming     
          full dilution                      34,570             34,345



Net income                             $     10,668        $    35,073

Add:
     Interest on convertible debentures,
     net of applicable income taxes             122               533

Net income, assuming full dilution     $     10,790        $   35,606

Net income per common share,
     assuming full dilution (A)        $       0.31        $     1.04     




(A)  In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, fully-
     diluted earnings per share may not exceed primary earnings per share.  
     The difference between primary and fully-diluted earnings per share is
     due to rounding.

     The computation of primary net income per common share is not included as 
     the computation can be clearly determined from the material contained in 
     this report.
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. §1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of URON Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB
      for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Donald Miller, Chief Executive
      Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Donald
              MillerChief
              Executive and Chief Financial OfficerSeptember
                11, 2006







Exhibit
            32 - Page 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,440,859
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,182,237
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (467,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  7,730,591
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,860,162
<PP&E>                                      10,736,623
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,691,394)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,145,066
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      (5,806,997)
<BONDS>                                    (5,110,934)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     (311,859)
<OTHER-SE>                                (13,915,276)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              (25,145,066)
<SALES>                                     26,235,355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,235,355
<CGS>                                     (14,059,508)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             (27,651,400)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,333,390)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (366,505)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,048,391)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,749,435)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,749,435)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                569,946
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,179,489)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

JAMAL BELTON, : 

 : Civil Action No. 10-6462 (SDW)

Plaintiff, : 

 :

 :

v. : ORDER

 : (CLOSED)

MARK SINGER, et al. :

 :

Defendants. :

For the reasons expressed in the Court’s Opinion filed 

herewith,

It is on this 8th day of July, 2011,

ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the

application submitted by Plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis

is hereby GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to file the

Complaint without prepayment of the filing fee; and it is further

ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, in

its entirety as against all named defendants, pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for failure to state a claim upon

which relief may be granted.

S/SUSAN D. WIGENTON

United States District Judge

Case 2:10-cv-06462-SDW-MCA Document 3 Filed 07/08/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 73
#### Jason T. Pilkenton, Respondent, v New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 911]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Livingston County (Dennis S. Cohen, A.J.), entered April 3, 2013. The order granted the petition seeking, inter alia, to direct respondent to submit to the appraisal process set forth in its policy of insurance.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the petition is denied.

Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order that granted the petition seeking, inter alia, to direct respondent to submit to the appraisal process set forth in its policy of insurance. Assuming without deciding that the petition was timely filed and procedurally proper, we agree with respondent that the insurance coverage dispute precludes the application of the appraisal process set forth in the policy *(see Kawa v Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.,*174 Misc 2d 407, 408-409 [1997]; *see generally Amerex Group, Inc. v Lexington Ins. Co.,*678 F3d 193, 204 [2d Cir 2012]). Insurance Law § 3408 (c) provides for an appraisal in the event of a covered loss, and here there is a pending declaratory judgment action in which the parties dispute whether this is a covered loss. Present — Scudder, EJ., Centra, Lindley, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.
Rail Employer Reporting Instructions

Appendix I: Electronic File Format

 Form BA-6A, Form BA-6 Address Report

The information specified on this form, which is required by law under Section 7(b)(6) of 

the Railroad Retirement Act and Section 209.12 of the Code of Federal Regulations, will 

be used by the Railroad Retirement Board to mail Form BA-6, Certificate of Service 

Months and Compensation, to the employees of your company. The information is 

authorized for collection under OMB control number 3220-0005. This report is due by 

April 1st each year. Failure to report or the making of a false or fraudulent report can result 

in criminal prosecution or civil penalties, or both.

We estimate the electronic versions of this form transmitted by a secure e-mail or a File 

Transfer Protocol (FTP) takes an average of 15 minutes per response to complete, including 

time for reviewing the instructions, getting the needed data, and reviewing the completed 

form. Federal agencies may not conduct or sponsor, and respondents are not required to 

respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB number. If you wish, 

send comments regarding the accuracy of our estimate or any other aspect of this form, 

including suggestions for reducing completion time, to

Associate Chief Information Officer for Policy and Compliance

Railroad Retirement Board

844 North Rush Street

Chicago, IL 60611-1275.

This exhibit below explains the format for reports filed on CD ROM, electronic files, or an 

upload on ERSNet. For information about the data to be entered, refer to Part V, Chapter 

5.

NOTE: Reports submitted on CD ROM, secure email, or FTP must be accompanied by 

Form G-440, "Report Specifications Sheet". 

Form BA-6a Record Format 

Field 

Length

Record 

Position Data and Instructions

9 1-9 The employee's 9-digit social security number.

15 10-24 First fifteen (15) characters of the employee's first 

name.

1 25 Employee’s middle initial.

20 26-45

First twenty (20) characters of the employee's 

surname. Spaces in such names as Mc Carthy, St 

Clair, De La Cross are acceptable.

30 46-75 Mailing Address Line 1 (Street Number, Post Office 

Box, etc.).

30 76-105 Mailing Address Line 2.

20 106-125 City

2 126-127 State
Rail Employer Reporting Instructions

Appendix I: Electronic File Format

 Form BA-6A, Form BA-6 Address Report

Form BA-6a Record Format 

Field 

Length

Record 

Position Data and Instructions

5 128-132 Zip Code

8 133-140 Blank Filler.

4 141-144 Four-digit BA number assigned by the Railroad 

Retirement Board.

8 145-152 Effective date of information (MMDDCCYY).

28 153-180 Blank Filler.

NOTE: The file should be saved as a text (*.txt) file with the record format listed above.
48 Occupational Outlook Quarterly • Spring 2012

Employment projections for occupational groups

that declined during the recession

Employment trends for occupational groups that declined during the recession, 2006–10 and projected 2020

In the 2007–09 recession, some occupations lost a 

significant number of jobs. Data from the U.S. Bureau 

of Labor Statistics (BLS) show which occupations are 

expected to recover quickly—and which aren’t. 

The chart shows percentage of employment from the 

2006 levels for the nine occupational groups in which 

employment declined by at least 2 percent between 2006 

and 2010. When the index level goes below 100, this 

indicates that the occupational group’s employment is 

lower than the 2006 level. In contrast, when the index 

is above 100, this indicates the occupational group’s 

employment is higher than the 2006 level. 

Although each group on the chart lost jobs between 

2006 and 2010, some were hit harder than others. For 

example, the construction and extraction occupations 

group lost almost 25 percent of its jobs between 2006 

and 2010, while the building and grounds cleaning and 

maintenance occupations group lost less than 5 percent. 

All but one of the groups—fishing, farming, and 

forestry occupations—are projected to gain jobs between 

2010 and 2020. Despite growth, however, several occupational groups—production, construction and extraction, and transportation and material moving—are not 

projected to return to 2006 employment levels by 2020. 

For example, in 2020, the construction and extraction 

occupations group is projected to have 93 percent of the 

almost 8.3 million jobs it had in 2006.

Data in this chart are from the BLS Employment 

Projections program. More information about the 

employment projections is available by emailing 

oohinfo@bls.gov, calling (202) 691-5700, or visiting at 

www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2012/01/art5full.pdf.

Note: Shaded area denotes recession as determined by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). BLS does not project interim years

 to the 2020 projection point.

Source: BLS, Current Employment Statistics (historical data) and Employment Projections (2020 data).

2006 2010 2020

Year

Percent of 2006 employment

80

90

110%

100

Building and grounds cleaning and maintenance 

Architecture and engineering

Farming, shing, and forestry

Sales and related

Oce and administrative support

Installation, maintenance, and repair

Transportation and material moving Production Construction and extraction
44 Occupational Outlook Quarterly ● Spring 2000

PercentState changeNevada 59Utah 42Arizona 40Idaho 38Colorado 35Washington 33Alaska 32Georgia 30

Texas 24Oregon 24New Mexico 23Tennessee 20Florida 20

South Carolina 19Alabama 19Montana 18Minnesota 17Kentucky 16Wisconsin 16Michigan 15California 15Mississippi 15North Carolina 15Louisana 14Virginia 14Nebraska 13South Dakota 13Indiana 13Maryland 12West Virginia 12Arkansas 12Missouri 12Delaware 12Hawaii 12Kansas 11Wyoming 10Illinois 10Vermont 10

Oklahoma 9Ohio 9New Hampshire 9Maine 8Iowa 7North Dakota 6Massachusetts 4New Jersey 4Pennsylvania 3New York 3

Connecticut -2Rhode Island -7

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics program

30 percentand higher

20 – 29percent

10 – 19percent

0 – 9percent

Decline

Growthcategory

Mountain States were clear winners in the 1988-98 jobgrowth race. Nevada, Utah, Arizona, Idaho, and Coloradohad the fastest rates of employment growth in the Nationfor the decade. Faring less well was New England, whichsaw declines in Connecticut and Rhode Island.

But remember, rate of change doesn’t tell the wholestory. When it comes to sheer numbers, size also matters.The large Pacific State of California, for example, led theNation in net job gain, with nearly 2 million new jobscreated over the decade.
">

Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Larry Reid, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cleartronic, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. I am the only certifying officer responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the Board of Directors:



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 12, 2011



/s/ Larry Reid

Larry Reid, Principal Executive Officer
Case 2:11-cv-00361-DMC -MF Document 60 Filed 07/14/11 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1809
Case 2:11-cv-00361-DMC -MF Document 60 Filed 07/14/11 Page 2 of 16 PageID: 1810
Case 2:11-cv-00361-DMC -MF Document 60 Filed 07/14/11 Page 3 of 16 PageID: 1811
Case 2:11-cv-00361-DMC -MF Document 60 Filed 07/14/11 Page 4 of 16 PageID: 1812
Case 2:11-cv-00361-DMC -MF Document 60 Filed 07/14/11 Page 5 of 16 PageID: 1813
Case 2:11-cv-00361-DMC -MF Document 60 Filed 07/14/11 Page 6 of 16 PageID: 1814
Case 2:11-cv-00361-DMC -MF Document 60 Filed 07/14/11 Page 7 of 16 PageID: 1815
Case 2:11-cv-00361-DMC -MF Document 60 Filed 07/14/11 Page 8 of 16 PageID: 1816
Case 2:11-cv-00361-DMC -MF Document 60 Filed 07/14/11 Page 9 of 16 PageID: 1817
Case 2:11-cv-00361-DMC -MF Document 60 Filed 07/14/11 Page 10 of 16 PageID: 1818
Case 2:11-cv-00361-DMC -MF Document 60 Filed 07/14/11 Page 11 of 16 PageID: 1819
Case 2:11-cv-00361-DMC -MF Document 60 Filed 07/14/11 Page 12 of 16 PageID: 1820
Case 2:11-cv-00361-DMC -MF Document 60 Filed 07/14/11 Page 13 of 16 PageID: 1821
Case 2:11-cv-00361-DMC -MF Document 60 Filed 07/14/11 Page 14 of 16 PageID: 1822
Case 2:11-cv-00361-DMC -MF Document 60 Filed 07/14/11 Page 15 of 16 PageID: 1823
Case 2:11-cv-00361-DMC -MF Document 60 Filed 07/14/11 Page 16 of 16 PageID: 1824