alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial data extracted from the registrant's
consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended February
1, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-01-1997
<CASH>                                             249
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      540
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       7935
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  9000
<PP&E>                                           26082
<DEPRECIATION>                                   20785
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   14297
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             9216
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         12990
<OTHER-SE>                                     (12946)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     14297
<SALES>                                          61571
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 61571
<CGS>                                            47676
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    65743
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4172)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (471)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4172)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (340)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3361)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 30, 2016

p1121 

# Order

Clerk November 30, 2016

152158(16)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 152158

COA: 326192

Wayne CC: 10

- 011466

- FC

KEVIN MICHAEL

- DORMAN BELTOWSKI

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 26, 2016

order is considered, and it is DENIED, b ecause it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
#### In the Matter of John Mulet, Appellant, v Raymond Kelly, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, and as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund, Article II, et al., Respondents.

[852 NYS2d 762]

Credible evidence rebuts the World Trade Center presumption (Administrative Code of City of NY § 13-252.1 [1] [a]), assuming it applies, and supports the Medical Board’s determination that petitioner’s disability is not traumatic in origin *(see Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys.,*88 NY2d 756, 760-761 [1996]). We have considered petitioner’s other arguments, including those based on the conflicting opinions of his psychiatrist and social worker, and find them unavailing. Concur&emdash;Mazzarelli, J.E, Saxe, Friedman and Nardelli, JJ. *(See*2006 NY Slip Op 30186(U).]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1306

BENNIE JAY EATMON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

B.D. MORGAN, INCORPORATED; BILLY D. MORGAN,

individually; E.L. ROSS, INCORPORATED; MACKIE

ROGERS, individually; BILLY ELLINGTON,

individually; PHIL HICKS, individually;

FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION; JOHN DOE;

JANE JANNELL DOE, RN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (CA-02-745-5-BO; CA-02-746-5-BO)

Submitted: October 3, 2005 Decided: October 20, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bennie Jay Eatmon, Appellant Pro Se. Franklin LeVerne Adams, Jr.,

VALENTINE, ADAMS & LAMAR, L.L.P., Nashville, North Carolina; Derek

Morgan Crump, BROWN, CRUMP, VANORE & TIERNEY, Raleigh, North

Carolina; Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney,

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Bennie Jay Eatmon appeals the district court’s order

granting Defendants’ motions for judgment on the pleadings and for

summary judgment and dismissing his civil action. He also appeals

the district court’s denial of his subsequent motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Eatmon v. B.D.

Morgan, Inc., No. 5:02-CV-745-BO(3) (E.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 2004);

Eatmon v. B.D. Morgan, Inc., No. 5:02-CV-745-BO(3) (E.D.N.C.

Jan. 12, 2005). We deny Eatmon’s motion to stay. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
      December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I, William B. Horne, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
      that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





Dated: June
                1, 2007
              By:
              /s/ William
                B. HorneWilliam
                B. HorneChief
                Financial Officer









A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 24, 2014

t0616 

# Order

Clerk June 24, 2014

148697

SHALANDA M. GOLDEN,

Plaintiff

- Appe llant,

v SC: 148697

COA: 317056

MCAC: 12

- 000039

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 2, 2014 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

CAROL ANN W. DOWNS,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2014-3218

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. PH-1221-13-0565-W-1.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Carol Ann W. Downs moves for leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis. 

Upon consideration thereof,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is denied. The docketing fee of $500 must 

be paid within 30 days of the date of filing of this order. 

Case: 14-3218 Document: 3 Page: 1 Filed: 10/07/2014
2 DOWNS v. DVA

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

Case: 14-3218 Document: 3 Page: 2 Filed: 10/07/2014
EXHIBIT 23.1




ACCOUNTANTS CONSENTS





Criticare Systems, Inc.


Waukesha, Wisconsin








We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-33497, 33-40038, 33-60214, 33-60644 and 333-88698) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-50884 and 333-88696) of our report dated August 26, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Criticare Systems, Inc. appearing in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003.














/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP


BDO Seidman, LLP


Milwaukee, Wisconsin


September 29, 2003
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 128547 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 128547 COA: 251413 Cass CC: 03-010024-FH DAVID DEWAYNE COULSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the March 1, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1121 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2005

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO andCFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Angeles Income Properties, Ltd. 6 (the"Partnership"), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D.Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, andStephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

This certification isfurnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
period ended June 30, 2008 (the Report), filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
  /s/ Marc J. EisenbergMarc J. EisenbergChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Pinnacle Gas Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending March 31,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Ronald T. Barnes, Senior Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and Secretary of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: May 30, 2007
|        |   | /s/ Ronald  T. Barnes                  |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Ronald T. Barnes                       |   |
|   |   | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial |   |
|   |   | Officer and Secretary                  |   |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned officer of Wellman, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies
that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2005 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is
provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be a
part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.

Date: November 21, 2006


                                        /s/ Thomas M. Duff
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Chief Executive Officer
S04Y0533.

#### IN THE MATTER OF BRIAN RAY HUTCHISON.

(607 SE2d 888)

Decided January 10, 2005.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, K. Gene Chap*
      *864
      *man, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*863Per curiam.

This matter is before the Court on the Notice of Discipline filed by the State Bar against Respondent Brian Ray Hutchison in which it recommends that Hutchison be disbarred for violating Rule 9.4 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, see Bar Rule 4-102 (d). The State Bar served Hutchison with the Notice of Discipline, and he acknowledged service but then failed to respond or to reject the notice in accordance with Bar Rule 4-208.3.

The facts show that Hutchison has been a member of the State Bar of Georgia since 1989 and also was a member of the State Bar of Illinois, which disbarred him on January 23, 2003 for violating Illinois rules of professional conduct by engaging in multiple instances of commingling and converting $192,477 worth of client funds; endorsing settlement checks without the payees’ authority; giving false testimony to a disciplinary authority; making misrepresentations to a tribunal and to clients; preparing false court documents; and other misconduct.

Under Rule 9.4, the record of disbarment by another jurisdiction is conclusive evidence of such disbarment, the maximum sanction for which is disbarment in the State of Georgia. We have reviewed the record in this case and agree with the State Bar that Hutchison should be disbarred. Accordingly, we hereby order that the name of Brian Ray Hutchison be removed from the rolls of attorneys licensed to practice law in the State of Georgia. Hutchison is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Disbarred.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                        1,570,687
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 139,786
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              1,771,440
<PP&E>                        25,987,000
<DEPRECIATION>                15,083,996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                12,996,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,210,416
<BONDS>                       0
<COMMON>                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    11,785,825
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  12,996,241
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              2,664,268
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              2,151,047
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               513,221
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           513,221
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  513,221
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .10
        

</TABLE>
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.

OFFI CIAL BUSINESS SO, BAAS UY HOosTAGE)) prTney BOWES
STATE OF TEXAS _:B-~. Betas e/a
PENALTY FOR (2, 6G Oitiac pias: 5
PRIVATE USE fac" a. a zp 78701 $ 00.27
70. ip oy E 0001401623 JUL. 10. 2015
7/8/2015 SAAR Bee
DRYMAN, RICHARD PAUL tN 3070545AR WR-83,279-01
On this day the Application for wri of eas corpus has been dismissed without
written order; (Ex Parte Ybarra, 149, 2447 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004)); Ex Parte

Florence, 319 S.W. 3d 695 (Tex. Crim: ‘App. 301 0).
& e/ RICHARD PAUL DRYMAN
NY TDC # 1918551

Abel Acosta, Clerk
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 28, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40031 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN BLANCO-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-448-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Juan Blanco-Hernandez appeals his conviction and the 75- month sentence imposed following entry of his guilty plea to one count of being found illegally in the United States subsequent todeportation and a conviction for an aggravated felony. BlancoHernandez contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. Because the Government does not seek to enforce Blanco-Hernandez’s appeal waiver, it is not binding. See United States v. Story , 439 F.3d 226, 231 (5th Cir. 2006).No. 06-40031 -2- Blanco-Hernandez’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Blanco-Hernandez contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding.
See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Blanco-Hernandez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.01





CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Paul
S. Lipschutz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of WaterPure International, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
WaterPure International, Inc.





By:
            
            /s/
      PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZDate:
      November 16, 2009
            
            Name:
            
            Paul
      S. LipschutzTitle:
            
            Chief Executive Officer




I, Robert
F. Orr, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
WaterPure International, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of WaterPure International,
Inc.







By:
            
            /s/
      ROBERT F. OFFDate:
      November 16, 2009
            
            Name:
            
            Robert
      F. OrrTitle:
            
            Chief Financial
      Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

LARRY EDWARD WEST JR., 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

DAVID VARANO, SUPERINTENDENT 

OF SCI COAL TOWNSHIP, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 90 MM 2015 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent 

 v. 

LARRY EDWARD WEST, JR., 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 91 MM 2015 

 

LARRY EDWARD WEST JR., 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

DAVID VARANO, SUPERINTENDENT 

OF SCI COAL TOWNSHIP, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 92 MM 2015 

 
2 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2015, the Application for Relief Seeking Leave 

to Exceed the Word Count Limitation is DENIED.