alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Shermen WSC Acquisition Corp.(the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                                |  /s/  John E. Toffolon, Jr. |
|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                |  Name:                           | John E. Toffolon, Jr. |
|                                |  Title:                          | Chief Financial Officer and |
|                                |                                  | Director (Principal Financial and |
|                                |                                  | Accounting Officer) |
|                                |                                  |   |
| Dated:  November 14, 2008 |                                  |

 

----
----

----

|   | 1. | The      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of and for the period covered by theReport. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/      Martin Schacker        |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   | Martin      Schacker            |   |
|   | Co-Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|   | May      15, 2009               |   |

----
EXHIBIT 21




                                 Subsidiaries
                                 ------------


    Company Name                     Jurisdiction of Incorporation
    ------------                     -----------------------------

ALG, Inc.                                      Delaware
Carpet Recycling of Georgia, Inc.              Georgia
CJC, Ltd.                                      Bermuda
CWB, Ltd.                                      Bermuda
DRS Holdings NV                                Netherlands Antilles
Fiber Industries, Inc.                         Delaware
JCT, Ltd.                                      Bermuda
Josdav, Inc.                                   Delaware
KRP, Ltd.                                      Bermuda
Materials Recovery of California, Inc.         Massachusetts
Middlewich Limited                             Ireland
MRF, Inc.                                      Delaware
Pavebury, Ltd. d/b/a Wellman International     Ireland
Prince, Inc.                                   Delaware
Resins Finance BV                              Netherlands
Shobara Limited                                Ireland
Warehouse Associates, Inc.                     South Carolina
Wellman BV                                     Netherlands
Wellman Exports VI, Inc.                       US Virgin Islands
Wellman Fibres Ltd.                            United Kingdom
Wellman Finance CV                             Netherlands
Wellman France Recyclage Sarl                  France
Wellman International Handelsgesellschaft Gmbh Germany
Wellman International Investments, Limited     Ireland
Wellman International Limited                  Ireland
Wellman of Mississippi, Inc.                   Delaware
Wellman PAC                                    New Jersey
Wellman PET Resins Europe BV                   Netherlands
Wellman Polymers, Ld.                          United Kingdom
Wellman Resins LLC                             Delaware
Wellman Scholarship Foundation, Inc.           South Carolina
Wellman UK Holdings Ltd.                       United Kingdom
Wellman Voluntary Employees Benefit
 Association                                   South Carolina
### TEXA S COU RT O F AP PEAL S, THIR D DISTRIC T, AT AU STIN NO. 03-01-00465-CV Canyon Lak

e Ar ea, Coma

l County, V oluntee r F ire D epar tment, Inc ., Appellant v. Patrick L. Lacombe, Appellee FROM THE COUN TY COUR T AT LAW OF

COMAL COUNTY NO. 95CV

-307, HO NORABLE BR ENDA C HAPM

AN, JU DGE P RESIDIN G On De ce mb er 4, 200 1, app ellant filed an a gr eed mot ion t o d ismi ss t his cau se. The app ellant has infor med t his Co ur t t hat t he parties h ave settled thei

r dispute. The parties h

ave agreed to dis mi ss the s ui

t, w i th pr ej udi ce . We wi l l

gr an t appe l l an t’s m oti on ; th e a

pp ea l i s d i sm i ss ed wi th prejudi ce.

__________________________________________ Bea An n Sm ith, Justice Bef ore Chi ef J

ustice A boussie, Justices

B. A. Sm ith an d Puryear Di sm i ss ed on A ppe l l an t’s Moti on File d: Decem

ber 20, 2001 Do No t Publis

h
1

Filed 7/24/15 P. v. Galusha CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CHARLES E. GALUSHA,

Defendant and Appellant.

C077084

(Super. Ct. No. 99F06435)

This appeal comes to us pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 

(Wende). Having reviewed the record as required by Wende, we affirm the judgment.

We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of 

the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)
2

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 1999, defendant Charles Edwin Galusha pleaded guilty to one count of 

violating Penal Code section 288, subdivision (c)(1),

1 and admitted three prior felony 

convictions, in return for the dismissal of five additional felony counts. The trial court 

thereafter sentenced defendant to a state prison term of 25 years to life. The court 

awarded defendant 682 days of presentence custody credit (455 actual days and 227 

conduct days). The court imposed a $10,000 restitution fine (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)) and a 

suspended parole revocation restitution fine in the same amount (§ 1202.45). 

According to the police report, on the evening of July 21, 1999, the 15-year-old 

male victim and an adult male visited defendant’s home, where defendant showed them 

pornographic videos, then performed oral copulation on the victim and masturbated him. 

On June 19, 2014, defendant filed a petition to recall sentence. (§ 1170.126.) 

On July 16, 2014, the trial court denied the petition, finding that defendant was 

ineligible for resentencing under section 1170.126, subdivision (e)(2), because his current 

conviction is for an offense that is registrable. (§ 290, subd. (c).) 

WENDE REVIEW

We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening 

brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and 

determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 

436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 

30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we 

received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the 

entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable 

to defendant.

 

1

 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code in effect at time of the charged 

offense.
3

DISPOSITION

The judgment (order denying resentencing petition) is affirmed.

 MURRAY , J.

We concur:

 BLEASE , Acting P. J.

 RENNER , J.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-62676) pertaining to the Westcorp 2001 Stock Option Plan, and
in the related Prospectus of Westcorp of our reports dated March 8, 2005 with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Westcorp, Westcorp
management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of
Westcorp, in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2004.




                                             /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 11, 2005
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

DAVID LOUIS DWYER , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3627

[ November 12, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; Sherwood Bauer, Jr.

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 43

- 2012

- CF

- 001148

- A

.
Mattie S. Fore of Mattie Fore Law, LLC, Lake Worth Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee , and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

C IKLIN , C ONNER , and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT
32.1


OFFICERS’
CERTIFICATIONS


Certification
of Chief Executive Officer







Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Douglas Emmett, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby
certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:






(i)
            the
      accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
      ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and






(ii)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




.





Dated:
      August 7, 2008
            By:
            /s/
      JORDAN L. KAPLANJordan
      L. KaplanPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerDouglas
      Emmett, Inc.







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
**Exhibit 10.1**

**AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT INVESTOR RIGHTS AGREEMENT**

**THIS AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT INVESTOR RIGHTS AGREEMENT** (“Amendment”) by **AFFINION GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.**, aDelaware corporation (the “Company”), is made as of April 30, 2010. Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement (as such term is defined below). 

**WHEREAS,**the Company is currently a party to that certain Management Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2005(the “Agreement”), among the Company, Affinion Group Holdings, LLC and the Holders that are parties thereto; 

**WHEREAS,** pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Agreement may be amended by the Company without the consent of any Holder tocure any ambiguity or to cure, correct or supplement any defective provisions contained therein, or to make any other provisions with respect to matters or questions thereunder as the Company may deem necessary or advisable so long as such actiondoes not affect adversely the interest of any Holder; and 

**WHEREAS,**the Company desires to amend the definition of“Stock Incentive Plan” under the Agreement and believes such amendment is necessary and advisable and does not affect adversely the interest of any Holder. 

**NOW, THEREFORE,** in consideration of the premises and of the covenants, understandings, undertakings and promises hereinafter setforth, intending to be legally bound thereby, the Company hereby determines as follows: 

1. The definition of “StockIncentive Plan” under Section 1 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

“Stock Incentive Plan” means each of the Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and the Affinion GroupHoldings, Inc. 2007 Stock Award Plan, as each may be amended, supplemented, restated or otherwise modified from time to time, and any other equity plan approved by the Company.” 

2. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 

**[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]**

 

1 

This Amendment is executed by the Company to be effective as of the date first abovewritten. 

 
**AFFINION GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.**By:   /s/ Nathaniel J. Lipman Name: Nathaniel J. Lipman Title: Chief Executive Officer
 

2
Case 2:11-cv-00599-SRC -MAS   Document 8-1    Filed 03/15/11   Page 1 of 1 PageID: 61
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | • | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | • | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  combined predecessors of the                  Partnership. |
|--------|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                  |                                                                                                                                                                         |                                                      |
|-------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |                                                                                                                                                                         |
|                                             |                                                                                                                                                                    |                                                 |
| Date:  September              7, 2007  | By:                                                                                                                                                                | /s/ MICHAEL              E. MERCER    |
|                                                  | Michael              E. Mercer                                                                                                                                               |
|                                                  | Chief                Financial Officer of EV Management LLC, general                partner of EV Energy GP, L.P.,general                partner of EV Energy Partners, L.P. |

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Earnest Jacobs, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 441]

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered on or about March 15, 2000, and judgment, same court and Justice, rendered February 4, 2004, deemed withdrawn.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We find defendant has withdrawn his appeal. Were we to review the merits, we would agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Buckley, EJ., Tom, Marlow, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1089 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the amendments 

made by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act which disqualify 

expenses for over-the-counter drugs under health savings accounts and 

health flexible spending arrangements. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 9, 2019 

Mr. ROBERTS (for himself, Mr. KING, Mr. ISAKSON, and Mr. MANCHIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the amendments made by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act which disqualify expenses for overthe-counter drugs under health savings accounts and 

health flexible spending arrangements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring Access to 

5 Medication Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1089 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DISQUALIFICATION OF EXPENSES FOR 

2 OVER-THE-COUNTER DRUGS UNDER CERTAIN 

3 ACCOUNTS AND ARRANGEMENTS. 

4 (a) HSAS.—Section 223(d)(2)(A) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking the last sen6 tence. 

7 (b) ARCHER MSAS.—Section 220(d)(2)(A) of the In8 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking the 

9 last sentence. 

10 (c) HEALTH FLEXIBLE SPENDING ARRANGEMENTS

11 AND HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT ARRANGEMENTS.—Sec12 tion 106 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

13 by striking subsection (f). 

14 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to expenses incurred after Decem16 ber 31, 2018. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen R. Brunner, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and President of Constellation Energy
Partners LLC, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:

(i) The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(ii) The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Constellation Energy Partners LLC.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Stephen R. Brunner                                        
|Stephen R. Brunner                                            
|Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and President

Date: August 10, 2009



55
DISTRICT OF NEW JESEY

UNITED SThTS OF NE!CA Hon. jWilliain H. Wails Crim.J No. 10-440 (WHW)

V. GNT1NUNCE ORD

THOM?.5 HOLI).ND

This matter having come befor the Court on the joint

application of aui J. Fisbinan, United states Attorney for the

District of New Jersy (by Brian L. Urbno, Assistant U.S.

Attorney), and defendant Thomas l4ollandj (by Chester Keller, Esq,)

for an order granting a continuance of tthe proceedings in the

above-captioned matter, and the deferLdnt being aware that she

has the right to have the matter brougt to trial within 70 days

of the date of his appearance before a fjudicial officer of this

court pursuant to Title 18 of the Unitd States Code, Section

3161(c) (1), and as the defendant has cnsented to such a

continuance, and for good and suffjCieit cause shown,

IT IS THE FINcIN OF THIS CO.3RT that this action should

be continued for the following reasons

1. Plea negotiations are uret1y in progress, and

both the United States and the defendaLs desire additional time

to finalze a plea agreement, which w41d render trial of this

matter unnecessary;
3. Pursuant to Title 19 of tl-e United States Code,

Section 3161 (h) (8), the ends of justice served by granting the

continuance outweigh the best interests jof the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial.

WHEREFORE, on this _j3 4 of.ttst7 2010,

IT IS ORtERED that defense moions shall be filed by

¶3UYC the government’s repi’ shall by filed by

4jQe argument of the mtions is scheduled for

the trial is gc1ieiuled for

and
tit under th 3pedy ia1 Act or 1974 pursuant to Tit i.e lB.,

unitec State Sevtioi 3I6Z.jh)(. ) / I ) /

— / /

I I

I! /A4—/ ,/I/

Ditric Jue

t cby consent to the om

eri<I €ty of this rer

Chester )eflr, Eq, çaNY FOE DN’AN’J