32410 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 8, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 

§§ 1730.67–1730.99 [Reserved] 

§ 1730.100 OMB Control Number. 

The Information collection 

requirements in this part are approved 

by the Office of Management and 

Budget and assigned OMB control 

number 0572–0141. 

Dated: June 25, 2009. 

James R. Newby, 

Acting Administrator, Rural Utilities Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–15888 Filed 7–7–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of the Comptroller of the 

Currency 

12 CFR Part 41 

[Docket ID OCC–2009–0001] 

RIN 1557–AD14 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

12 CFR Part 222 

[Regulation V; Docket No. R–1203, R–1255] 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION 

12 CFR Part 334 

RIN 3064–AC83; 3064–AD00 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of Thrift Supervision 

12 CFR Part 571 

[Docket ID OTS–2009–0012] 

RIN 1550–AC30 

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION 

ADMINISTRATION 

12 CFR Part 717 

RIN 3133–AC90 and RIN 3133–AD00 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

16 CFR Parts 641, 680, 681, and 698 

RIN 3084–AA94 

Fair Credit Reporting Affiliate 

Marketing Regulations; Identity Theft 

Red Flags and Address Discrepancies 

Under the Fair and Accurate Credit 

Transactions Act of 2003; Correction 

AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the 

Currency, Treasury (OCC); Board of 

Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System (Board); Federal Deposit 

Insurance Corporation (FDIC); Office of 

Thrift Supervision, Treasury (OTS); 

National Credit Union Administration 

(NCUA); and Federal Trade Commission 

(Commission). 

ACTION: Final rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: The OCC, Board, FDIC, OTS, 

NCUA, and Commission published in 

the Federal Register on May 14, 2009 a 

technical correction to final rules to 

implement the affiliate marketing 

provisions and identity theft red flags 

and address discrepancy provisions of 

the Fair and Accurate Credit 

Transactions Act of 2003 (FACT Act). 

The correction included in this Federal 

Register document corrects an error in 

the DATES section which caused the 

effective date to an amendment to the 

Commission’s rules to be incorrect. This 

correction does not affect the OCC’s, 

Board’s, FDIC’s, OTS’s, or NCUA’s 

rules. 

DATES: Effective Date: This correction is 

effective July 8, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

OCC: Jon Mitchell, Attorney, Legislative 

and Regulatory Activities Division, 

(202) 874–5090, Office of the 

Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219. 

Board: Amy E. Burke, Senior 

Attorney, or Jelena McWilliams, 

Attorney, Division of Consumer and 

Community Affairs, (202) 452–3667 or 

(202) 452–2412; or Kara Handzlik, 

Attorney, Legal Division, (202) 452– 

3852, Board of Governors of the Federal 

Reserve System, 20th and C Streets, 

NW., Washington, DC 20551. For users 

of a Telecommunications Device for the 

Deaf (TDD) only, contact (202) 263– 

4869. 

FDIC: Richard M. Schwartz, Counsel, 

Legal Division, (202) 898–7424; Jeffrey 

M. Kopchik, Senior Policy Analyst, 

(202) 898–3872, or Samuel Frumkin, 

Senior Policy Analyst, (202) 898–6602, 

Division of Supervision and Consumer 

Protection, Federal Deposit Insurance 

Corporation, 550 17th Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20429. 

OTS: Suzanne McQueen, Consumer 

Regulations Analyst, Compliance and 

Consumer Protection Division, (202) 

906–6459; April Breslaw, Director, 

Consumer Regulations, (202) 906–6989; 

or Richard Bennett, Senior Compliance 

Counsel, Regulations and Legislation 

Division, (202) 906–7409, Office of 

Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20552. 

NCUA: Linda Dent, Attorney, or 

Regina Metz, Attorney, Office of General 

Counsel, 703–518–6540, National Credit 

Union Administration, 1775 Duke 

Street, Alexandria, VA 22314–3428. 

Commission: Anthony Rodriguez 

(Affiliate Marketing Rule) or Cora Han 

(Identity Theft Red Flags Rules), 

Attorneys, Division of Privacy and 

Identity Protection, Bureau of Consumer 

Protection, (202) 326–2252, Federal 

Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The OCC, 

Board, FDIC, OTS, NCUA, and 

Commission published a document in 

the Federal Register on May 14, 2009 

(74 FR 22639). The document (OCC– 

2009–0001; FR–R–1203 and R–1255; 

FDIC 3064–AD00; OTS–2008–0024; 

NCUA RIN 3133–AC90 and RIN 3133– 

AD00; and FTC RIN 3084–AA94) made 

technical corrections to the final rules 

implementing the affiliate marketing 

provisions and identity theft red flags 

and address discrepancy provisions of 

the Fair and Accurate Credit 

Transactions Act of 2003 (FACT Act). 

The document also provided effective 

dates for these corrections. This 

document corrects an error in the DATES

section, where renumbered amendatory 

instructions caused the effective date to 

an amendment to the Commission’s 

rules to be incorrect. 

In the technical corrections 

amendment to the final rule, FR Doc. 

No. 2009–10009 published on May 14, 

2009 (74 FR 22639), make the following 

correction: ‘‘On page 22639, in the 

center column, in the DATES section, the 

number ‘‘34’’ in the fourth line is 

corrected to read ‘‘35’’. 

By the Office of the Comptroller of the 

Currency. 

Julie L. Williams, 

First Senior Deputy Comptroller and Chief 

Counsel. 

By order of the Secretary of the Board 

acting under delegated authority, July 1, 

2009. 

Jennifer J. Johnson, 

Secretary of the Board. 

Dated at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of 

June 2009. 

By order of the Board of Directors. 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 

Robert E. Feldman, 

Executive Secretary. 

Dated: June 17, 2009. 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 8, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 32411 

By the Office of Thrift Supervision, 

Deborah Dakin, 

Acting Chief Counsel. 

By order of the National Credit Union 

Administration Board, June 18, 2009. 

Mary F. Rupp, 

Secretary of the Board. 

By Direction of the Commission. 

Donald S. Clark, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–16030 Filed 7–7–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–33–P; 6210–01–P; 6714–01–P; 

6720–01–P; 7535–01–P; 3084–88–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2009–0044; Directorate 

Identifier 2008–NM–132–AD; Amendment 

39–15953; AD 2009–14–03] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier 

Model CL–600–1A11 (CL–600), CL– 

600–2A12 (CL–601), CL–600–2B16 (CL– 

601–3A, CL–601–3R, and CL–604) 

Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for the 

products listed above. This AD results 

from mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) 

originated by an aviation authority of 

another country to identify and correct 

an unsafe condition on an aviation 

product. The MCAI describes the unsafe 

condition as: 

There have been several Stick Pusher 

Capstan Shaft failures causing the dormant 

loss or severe degradation of the stick pusher 

function. * * * 

Dormant loss or severe degradation of 

the stick pusher function could result in 

reduced controllability of the airplane. 

We are issuing this AD to require 

actions to correct the unsafe condition 

on these products. 

DATES: This AD becomes effective 

August 12, 2009. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of certain publications listed in this AD 

as of August 12, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD 

docket on the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in person at the 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Operations, M–30, West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Bruce Valentine, Aerospace Engineer, 

Systems and Flight Test Branch, ANE– 

172, FAA, New York Aircraft 

Certification Office, 1600 Stewart 

Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 

11590; telephone (516) 228–7328; fax 

(516) 794–5531. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 to include an AD that would 

apply to the specified products. That 

NPRM was published in the Federal 

Register on February 23, 2009 (74 FR 

8039). That NPRM proposed to correct 

an unsafe condition for the specified 

products. The MCAI states: 

There have been several Stick Pusher 

Capstan Shaft failures causing the dormant 

loss or severe degradation of the stick pusher 

function. This directive is issued to revise the 

first flight of the day check [in the Airplane 

Flight Manual] of the stall protection system 

to detect a degradation of the stick pusher 

function. It also introduces a new periodic 

maintenance task [in the Airworthiness 

Limitations Section of the Instructions for 

Continuing Airworthiness] to check the 

structural integrity of the stick pusher 

capstan shaft. 

Dormant loss or severe degradation of 

the stick pusher function could result in 

reduced controllability of the airplane. 

You may obtain further information by 

examining the MCAI in the AD docket. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. We 

received no comments on the NPRM or 

on the determination of the cost to the 

public. 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the available data and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting the AD 

as proposed. 

Differences Between This AD and the 

MCAI or Service Information 

We have reviewed the MCAI and 

related service information and, in 

general, agree with their substance. But 

we might have found it necessary to use 

different words from those in the MCAI 

to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. 

operators and is enforceable. In making 

these changes, we do not intend to differ 

substantively from the information 

provided in the MCAI and related 

service information. 

We might also have required different 

actions in this AD from those in the 

MCAI in order to follow our FAA 

policies. Any such differences are 

highlighted in a Note within the AD. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD will affect 

707 products of U.S. registry. We also 

estimate that it will take about 1 workhour per product to comply with the 

basic requirements of this AD. The 

average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. 

Based on these figures, we estimate the 

cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to 

be $56,560, or $80 per product. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this AD will not 

have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this AD: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

3. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this AD and placed it in the AD docket. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES