alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer and Vice President  Finance
of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
their knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company. /s/ Stephen E. Gorman  Stephen E. Gorman, President and Chief Executive Officer  /s/ Cheryl W. Farmer  Cheryl W. Farmer, Vice President  Finance  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Greyhound Lines, Inc. and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1



                                   EXHIBIT 11


              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           Year Ended
                                                      ------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Sept. 28             Sept. 29              Oct. 1
                                                          1997                 1996                 1995
                                                      -----------          -----------           -----------

<S>                                                   <C>                  <C>                   <C>        
Weighted average shares outstanding                    11,950,689           12,694,297            12,079,411
Common Stock equivalents:
  Stock options                                            57,024               61,469               284,660
                                                      -----------          -----------           -----------

                           TOTAL                       12,007,713           12,755,766            12,364,071
                                                      ===========          ===========           ===========


Net Income (in thousands)                             $     2,673          $     1,686           $     7,203
                                                      ===========          ===========           ===========

Earnings Per Common Share                             $       .22          $       .13           $       .58
                                                      ===========          ===========           ===========
</TABLE>





                                       -1-
EXHIBIT 28(a)

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS TO THE MEMBERS OF WELLMAN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Wellman
International Limited and subsidiary at 31 December 1995 and 1994, and the
related consolidated profit and loss accounts, retained earnings, and changes
in financial position for each of the three years in the period ended 31
December 1995, all expressed in Irish pounds (not presented separately
herewith).  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America.  Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes
examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above, expressed in Irish
pounds, present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
position of Wellman International Limited and subsidiary at 31 December 1995
and 1994, and the consolidated results of operations and changes in financial
position for each of the three years in the period ended 31 December 1995 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America.


KPMG
Chartered Accountants
Registered Auditors



Dublin, Ireland

18 January 1996
EX 10.40 Amendment to Term Sheet Agreement






Exhibit 10.40




AMENDMENT TO
TERM SHEET AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, PrivateBancorp, Inc. (“PrivateBancorp”) has entered into term sheet agreements (“Term Sheet Agreement”) with various employees; and
WHEREAS, severance benefits under such Term Sheet Agreements may constitute non-qualified deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”); and
WHEREAS, severance benefits under the Term Sheet Agreements are conditioned on the employee executing and not revoking a waiver and general release of claims; and
WHEREAS, the Term Sheet Agreements provide that to the extent any amount payable under the Term Sheet Agreements would trigger the additional tax imposed by Code Section 409A, this term sheet agreement shall be modified to avoid such additional tax; and
WHEREAS, the officers of PrivateBancorp have been notified of the need to specify, for severance benefits subject to Code Section 409A, whether such severance benefits must commence in the calendar year following the calendar year of termination. 
NOW, THEREFORE, each Term Sheet Agreement is amended to state as follows:
If the Holding Company reasonably determines that your Severance Benefits are “deferred compensation” under Code Section 409A, and if your “separation from service” entitling you to Severance Benefits occurs on or after October 15 of a calendar year, such Severance Benefits will commence on the earlier of (a) the 90th day following “separation from service,” or (b) the first payroll date that occurs in January of the following calendar year, provided, however, the return of the waiver and general release of claims remains a condition to receiving such Severance Benefits but the date such waiver and general release is returned and becomes effective shall not change when such Severance Benefits commence as described above.
WHEREFORE, this Amendment is executed this 28th day of December, 2012.


PRIVATEBANCORP, INC.




By:     /s/ C. Brant Ahrens        


Title: President, Personal Client Services
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 125 (Wednesday, July 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15486]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System


Commercial Item Handbook

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Request for public input.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is in the process of updating its Commercial Item 
Handbook. The purpose of the Handbook is to help acquisition personnel 
develop sound business strategies for procuring commercial items. DoD 
is seeking industry input on the contents of the draft Handbook.

DATES: Submit written comments to the address shown below on or before 
July 31, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments to: Office of the Director, Defense 
Procurement and Acquisition Policy, Attn: OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(CPIC), 3060 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Comments also may be 
submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4102081e09202f25232e2e2a012e32256f2c282d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3d7e7462755c53595f5252567d524e5913505451">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Linda Heartley, by telephone at 
703-695-7062, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#327e5b5c56531c7a575340465e574b725d41561c5f5b5e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b7fbded9d3d699ffd2d6c5c3dbd2cef7d8c4d399dadedb">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DoD formed a working group, consisting of 
personnel from the military departments and defense agencies, to update 
the Commercial Item Handbook issued by the Office of the Secretary of 
Defense (Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics) in November 2001. A 
draft of the updated Commercial Item Handbook can be found at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/cpic/cp/docs/draftcihandbook_06172009.doc. DoD is 
seeking industry input on the contents of the draft Handbook.

Michele P. Peterson,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
[FR Doc. E9-15486 Filed 6-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CHARLES DOUGLAS NAPIER, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2752

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 20, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Neil A. Roddenbery, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Matthew D. Bernstein, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

:

SUZANNE VENEZIA, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-6692 (MLC)

:

Plaintiff, : O P I N I O N

:

v. :

:

UNION COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S :

OFFICE, et al., :

:

Defendants. :

 :

THE PLAINTIFF brings this action containing claims that are

apparently pursuant to federal law and state law. (Dkt. entry

no. 4, Am. Compl.) By an Opinion, and an Order and Judgment,

both dated May 31, 2011 (“May Opinion” and “May Order”), the

Court (1) dismissed the plaintiff’s claims as drafted in their

entirety because they (a) did not comply with Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure 8(a), 8(d), and 10(b), and (b) contained certain

allegations that were barred by the immunity doctrine, and (2)

granted the plaintiff leave to move to file amended pleadings

curing the deficiencies. (Dkt. entry no. 64, 5-31-11 Order & J.;

see dkt. entry no. 63, 5-31-11 Op.) The plaintiff is assumed to

be familiar with the contents of the May 2011 Opinion and the May

2011 Order; the Court will not repeat their contents here.

THE PLAINTIFF, in response to the May 2011 Opinion and the

May 2011 Order, argues that (1) the Court “ignored an important

central unifying element” in this action when the Court addressed

the impropriety of annexing 200 pages of exhibits to her

Case 3:10-cv-06692-MLC-TJB Document 80 Filed 03/23/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1186
pleadings, as she should be permitted to show that she “wrote

letter after letter” to various parties (dkt. entry no. 65, Pl.

Br. at 1), (2) “any reasonable person would have ‘discerned’ as

facts and plausible allegations, both the Plaintiff’s physical

injury and violation of rights” (id. at 2), (3) the Court’s

assessment of her pleadings was “superficial” (id. at 2), (4) the

Court has “placed all of its attention on form and not on

substance” in reviewing her pleadings (id. at 5), and (5) there

is no need for her to file amended pleadings, and thus the May

2011 Opinion and the May 2011 Order should be vacated. 

Consequently, the plaintiff has not submitted any proposed

amended pleadings for the Court to review.

THE COURT provided the plaintiff with an opportunity to cure

the deficiencies in her pleadings. The plaintiff has rejected

this opportunity. Thus, this action will remain closed. But the

Court will grant the plaintiff leave to pursue any state law

claims in state court, in the interests of justice. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1367. The Court will issue an appropriate order and judgment.1

 s/ Mary L. Cooper 

MARY L. COOPER

United States District Judge

Dated: March 23, 2012

 The Court expressed concerns in the May 2011 Opinion 1

about potential parallel state court proceedings. (See 5-31-11

Op. at 4-7.) Those concerns are now moot.

2

Case 3:10-cv-06692-MLC-TJB Document 80 Filed 03/23/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1187
#### Timothy Kauffmann et al., Appellants, v Iso Capric et al., Respondents.

[852 NYS2d 789]

In response to the defendants’ showing that they neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the alleged hazardous condition complained of for a sufficient length of time to discover and remedy it, the plaintiffs failed to submit admissible evidence sufficient to show the existence of a triable issue of fact *(see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,*67 NY2d 836 [1986]; *Arrufat v City of New York,*45 AD3d 710 [2007]; *Seabury v County of Dutchess,*38 AD3d 752 [2007]; *Britto v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc.,*21 AD3d 436 [2005]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint *(see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Mastro, J.P., Florio, Miller and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1196 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1715 Linnerud Drive in Sun Prairie, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Fire Captain Cory Barr Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1196 ES

1 SECTION 1. FIRE CAPTAIN CORY BARR POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1715 Linnerud Drive in Sun 

5 Prairie, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Fire Captain Cory Barr Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Fire Captain Cory 

11 Barr Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the Senate July 30, 2019. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1196 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostBarr Post Office Building’’. Prairie, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Fire Captain Cory al Service located at 1715 Linnerud Drive in Sun
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                 CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regal  Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report"),  I,  PARRISH  MEDLEY,
President,  Chief  Executive Officer  and  Director  of  the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to {section}906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
<S> <C> <C>
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    (2) The information contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of the Company.
<S> <C> <C>
</TABLE>



Date: October 15, 2010


/s/ Parrish Medley
PARRISH MEDLEY
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
#### Stephen A. HODGSON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Tom ROY; Joan Fabian; John King; Michelle Smith; Joseph Hobson; Bruce Julson; David Reishus; Sheryl Vezner; Greg Lindell; John Doe; Jane Doe, sued in their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-3018.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: March 26, 2013.

Filed: March 29, 2013.

Stephen A. Hodgson, Bayport, MN, pro se.

Angela Behrens, Attorney General’s Office, Saint Paul, MN, for Defendants-Ap-pellees.

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Hodgson appeals the district court’s1 judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in which he claimed, as relevant, that his First Amendment rights were violated when mailroom staff *558at the Minnesota Correctional Facility in Stillwater confiscated mail sent to him in May 2010. Following careful review, we hold that the district court did not err in granting defendants summary judgment. *See Mason v. Corr. Med. Servs.,*559 F.3d 880, 884-85 (8th Cir.2009) (de novo review of summary judgment). This court lacks jurisdiction to consider the district court’s denial of Hodgson’s motion for a temporary restraining order. *See Hamm v. Groose,*15 F.3d 110, 112-13 (8th Cir.1994).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting in part the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
|                                         | 31.2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|---------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
|                                        
|I, Lisa Norman, certify that:           
|1.                                       | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Home Alliance Corporation.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|2.                                       | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.
|3.                                       | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results from operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.                





|By:  /s/Lisa NormanLisa Norman
Chief Financial Officer | Date:  October 16, 2013
|------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Clarence Jones, Appellant.

[855 NYS2d 409]

No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Anthony A. Cook, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report of DCP Holding Company (the “Company’) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 30, 2007;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 12a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 14, 2007   Signature: /s/ Anthony A. Cook  Anthony A. Cook  Principal Executive Officer
Case 2:10-cv-06356-SRC -MAS Document 35 Filed 07/11/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 210
Case 2:10-cv-06356-SRC -MAS Document 35 Filed 07/11/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 211