alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Leonard C. Purkis, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Virtual Radiologic Corporation;

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.              The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

(a)         Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.              The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)         All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
|   | Date:  May 2,  2008 | By:    | /s/ Leonard C. Purkis   |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |                          |   | Leonard C. Purkis       |
|   |                          |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.61



                    [ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED LETTERHEAD]


                                 June 30, 1998


Mr. Martinn H. Mandles
ABM Industries Incorporated
160 Pacific Avenue, Suite 222
San Francisco, CA 94111


RE: AMENDMENT OF DIVISION EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT --
    INCREASE IN SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PENSION ("SERP")

Dear Martinn:

I am pleased to inform you that the Executive Officer Compensation and Stock
Option Committee of ABM's Board of Directors has approved an increase in the
monthly benefit payable to you to $4,167.00 under this plan. Accordingly, the
maximum benefit payable to you shall increase to $500,000.

This letter shall, in this regard, amend your Executive Employment Agreement, as
follows:

        The monthly Consulting Fees benefit set forth in paragraph X.5
        CONSULTANCY shall be $4,167.00.

Please sign and date all three (3) originals and return two (2) of them to me.


Very truly yours

/s/ WILLIAM W. STEELE
----------------------------------
William W. Steele


I hereby agree to the foregoing amendment.

/s/ MARTINN H. MANDLES                  Dated: June 30, 1998.
-----------------------------------            ---------------------------------
Martinn H. Mandles


New York Stock Exchange Symbol: ABM
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
 Date:      May 1, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Leonard C. PurkisLeonard C. PurkisChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32





Certification of Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350








In connection with
the Quarterly  Report of Striker Energy Corp. (Registrant) on Form
10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission filed concurrently
herewith (the Report), I, Joseph Carusone, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Registrant, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1)  the report
fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.








Striker Energy Corp., a Nevada
corporation




Date:
October 15,
2008 By:/s/
Joseph Carusone, President, CEO,  Treasurer,
Principal Accounting Officer and Director
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Joan Mullin • Action No. 3:11 -CV-247(MLC)(LHG)

Plamtiff(s) CLERK'S ORDER

V.

The State of New Jersey, et al

Defendant(s)

This matter having come before the Court upon the fliing of a Compiaint, Notice of

Removai, Nntir^ of Anneal. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, or Pro Hoc Vice Request for

NEF on June 22,2016 by Shelley Stangler, Esq., counsel for the plaintiff in the above-captioned

matter, and it appearing that the pleading was electronicaliy filed using the Court's CM/ECF

fliing system and the payment of fliing fees made via Fay.gov; and it further appearing that:

a. An overpayment has been made by the filer, OR

X b, A duplicate, identical Complaint, Notice of Removal, Notice of Appeal,

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus or Pro Hoc Vice Request for NEF was filed more than

once by the same attorney or the same law firm; and for good cause shown,

IT IS on this _ in day of August 2016,

ORDERED THAT, the sum of $505.00 is refunded through Pay.gov.

WILLIAM T. WALSH, CI

Theresa L. Burnett

Chief Deputy Clerk

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG Document 256 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 4637
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

_______________________________________

:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, :

: Criminal No. 10-854-02 (FSH)

v. :

: ORDER

ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ :

:

Defendant. :

_______________________________________:

This matter having come before the Court upon the application of Steven D. Altman, Esq.,

of the law firm of Benedict and Altman, attorney for defendant Antonio Rodriguez, for the entry of

an Order granting counsel’s motion to be relieved of his appearance and representation of defendant

Rodriguez in connection with the above-captioned matter; and the Court having read and considered

the papers submitted therewith; and for good cause shown; 

IT IS on this 31 day of October, 2011, st

ORDERED that the Motion to be relieved as counsel for defendant Rodriguez [docket #61]

is hereby GRANTED. 

 s/ Garrett E. Brown, Jr. 

 Chief Garrett E. Brown, Jr. 

 United States District Judge

Case 2:10-cr-00854-MCA Document 64 Filed 10/31/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 171
Order entered July 24, 2015 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00353-CV 

MANSIK & YOUNG PLAZA LLC, YOUNG HO KIM, 

SUN HUI KIM, AND DAVID KIM, Appellants 

V. 

K-TOWN MANAGEMENT, LLC D/B/A KTN US; IP INVESTMENTS, LTD.; 

ODES H. KIM; JI HONG PARK; AND CHUL SEUNG PARK, Appellees 

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-12729 

ORDER 

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

Based on our opinion of this date, we AFFIRM the trial court’s order of May 14, 2015 

and DENY appellees’ motion to increase the amount of appellants’ supersedeas bond. 

 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT 

 CHIEF JUSTICE
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Real Estate Referral Center Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Lisa McIntosh, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 15thday of October, 2008.                                                                                                                 
|   

LISA MCINTOSHLisa McIntoshChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Alvarez, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 845]

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the Supreme Court’s determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, based on the facts and admissions contained in the pre-sentence investigation report, the case summary, and the risk assessment instrument of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders *(see*Correction Law § 168-n; *People v Yarborough,*43 AD3d 1129, 1130 [2007], *lv denied*9 NY3d 816 [2007]; *People v Penson,*38 AD3d 866, 867 [2007]; *People v Romana,*35 AD3d 1241 [2006]; *People v Carlton,*307 AD2d 763, 764 [2003]). Spolzino, J.P., Angiolillo, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
Case 2:11-cr-00034-FSH Document 21 Filed 01/20/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 45
Case 2:11-cr-00034-FSH Document 21 Filed 01/20/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 46
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40453

Conference Calendar

__________________

SAMUEL KAY SHANNON,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LELAND HEUSZEL,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:94-CV-188

- - - - - - - - - -

August 23, 1995

Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

A complaint filed in forma pauperis may be dismissed as

frivolous pursuant to § 1915(d) if it has no arguable basis in

law or in fact. Booker v. Koonce, 2 F.3d 114, 115 (5th Cir.

1993). This court reviews a § 1915(d) dismissal for an abuse of

discretion. Id.

Shannon has not shown how defendant Heuszel was personally

involved in any alleged constitutional deprivation or how any
No. 95-40453

-2-

policy was involved. See Thompson v. Steele, 709 F.2d 381, 382

(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 897 (1983); Thompkins v. Belt,

828 F.2d 298, 304 (5th Cir. 1987). The district court thus did

not abuse its discretion by overruling Shannon's objections to

the magistrate judge's report and dismissing Shannon's § 1983

claim as frivolous pursuant to § 1915(d).

Finally, Shannon requests the appointment of counsel. The

case is not so exceptional that appointing counsel would be

appropriate. See Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209, 212 (5th

Cir. 1982).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000811671
<NAME> STERLING FINANCIAL CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           35414
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              24
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  9350
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      68967
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          122885
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            124066
<LOANS>                                         427274
<ALLOWANCE>                                       7780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  711154
<DEPOSITS>                                      610105
<SHORT-TERM>                                      2234
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              13383
<LONG-TERM>                                      21523
<COMMON>                                         29663
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       34246
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  711154
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  37975
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                10875
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 48850
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               19093
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               21153
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            27697
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      534
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  23423
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  12033
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       12033
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      8994
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.52
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.99
<LOANS-NON>                                       1010
<LOANS-PAST>                                       330
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  7640
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      676
<RECOVERIES>                                       282
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 7780
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              7780
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Hon. Claire C. Cecchi

 

v. : Mag. No. 11-4022 

 

ANDREW AUERNHEIMER : ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on the joint

application of Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the

District of New Jersey (Lee Vartan and Zach Intrater, Assistant

U.S. Attorneys, appearing), and defendant Andrew Auernheimer

(Candace Hom, Esq., appearing),

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that: 

(1) On January 21, 2011, defendant Auernheimer appeared

before a Magistrate Judge in the Western District of Arkansas; 

(2) Pursuant to Rule 5(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of

Criminal Procedure, the Court ordered the United States Marshal’s

Service to transport defendant Auernheimer to the District of New

Jersey; and 

(3) Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F), the first

ten days after such an Order is entered shall be excluded in

computing the time within which an information or indictment must

be filed. 

IT IS, therefore, on this day of February, 2011, 

ORDERED that the period from January 22, 2011 through

Case 2:11-mj-04022-CCC Document 13-1 Filed 02/04/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 67
and including January 31, 2011 shall be excluded in computing

time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974.

 

HON. CLAIRE C. CECCHI

United States Magistrate Judge

-2-

Case 2:11-mj-04022-CCC Document 13-1 Filed 02/04/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 68
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 850 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 850

Expressing disapproval of the Trump administration's removal of United 
  States Army Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman from the National 
                           Security Council.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2020

     Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing disapproval of the Trump administration's removal of United 
  States Army Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman from the National 
                           Security Council.

Whereas Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman serves our country honorably and 
        selflessly;
Whereas Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman is a Purple Heart recipient and an 
        Iraq war veteran with multiple military honors;
Whereas, on November 19, 2019, Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman testified, 
        under subpoena, before the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of 
        the House of Representatives about President Trump's July 25 telephone 
        call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and his concerns about 
        the call, which he reported to his superiors;
Whereas at the hearing, Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman said ``I am a 
        patriot, and it is my sacred duty and honor to advance and defend our 
        country, irrespective of party or politics.'';
Whereas Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman and his twin brother, Lieutenant 
        Colonel Yevgeny Vindman, were removed from the National Security Council 
        on February 7, 2020, in an apparent act of retaliation;
Whereas the Office of the President of the United States should seek to preserve 
        the political neutrality of the Federal Government; and
Whereas blatant attempts to govern by fear, exemplified by the unwarranted and 
        politically motivated termination of two qualified, distinguished, and 
        dedicated public servants has no place in a Nation ruled by laws: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the actions taken by the Trump administration to seek 
        retribution from witnesses of the House impeachment inquiry is 
        a cruel attack on all public servants, creating fear in the 
        United States Government;
            (2) the Trump administration must immediately end 
        retribution of all witnesses of the House impeachment inquiry; 
        and
            (3) the Trump administration should uphold its 
        responsibility to democratic values of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                   Exhibit 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT




       o Meret Communications, Inc., a California corporation
         o Sorrento Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation
           o Sorrento Networks Europe SA, a Belgium company
           o Sorrento Networks GmBH, incorporated in Germany
           o Osicom Technologies Europe Limited, incorporated in
             the United Kingdom
           o Osicom Technologies SA, incorporated in France
           o Sorrento Networks Asia-Pacific Pte Ltd.

       o Sorrento Valley Real Estate Holdings, LLC, a California limited
         liability corporation
       o Relialogic Technology Corporation, a California corporation
       o R-Net International, Inc., a Nevada corporation
       o PDP Acquisition Corp., a California corporation, (doing business as
         Pacific Data Products)
       o Sciteq Communications, Inc., a Nevada corporation