alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 14-1469

Filed July 22, 2015

Upon the Petition of

ALICIA E. FREDERICKSEN,

Petitioner-Appellant,

And Concerning

THOMAS A. DOHERTY,

Respondent-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Adair County, Gregory A. Hulse, 

Judge. 

Alicia Fredericksen appeals the portion of the district court’s order 

awarding joint legal custody and visitation. AFFIRMED.

Patrick W. O’Bryan of O’Bryan Law Firm, Des Moines, for appellant.

Thomas E. Doherty, Casey, pro se.

Considered by Danilson, C.J., and Tabor and McDonald, JJ.
2

DANILSON, C.J.

Alicia Fredericksen appeals the district court order granting her and 

Thomas Doherty joint legal custody of their children. She claims the district court 

erred in not granting her sole legal custody.1 Alicia also claims visitation under 

the court’s terms is inappropriate. The district court ordered Thomas’s visitation 

to be supervised, but upon specified terms, the visitation whould be 

unsupervised. Upon our de novo review, we conclude unsupervised visitation, 

conditioned on completion of the Children in the Middle program and substance 

abuse treatment, is appropriate, as is joint legal custody. 

Alicia largely contends she should be awarded sole legal custody because 

the parties are unable to communicate. We acknowledge the parties’ difficulties 

in communicating, but some of the problem can be attributed to Alicia’s actions. 

She should not be rewarded by a grant of sole legal custody. Sometimes in life 

there are actions required of a person, in this case a parent, which must be done 

even if the person does not want to take such action. In this case, that entails 

the necessity of communicating with the other parent in a mature, nonargumentative fashion for the benefit of the child.

We also decline to require Alicia’s requested additional condition, that 

Thomas address mental health issues before being afforded unsupervised 

visitation. The record simply does not support such a condition.

 

1 Appellant states “the trial court’s ruling is not granting Alicia primary physical custody of 

the parties’ children should be reversed. Alicia should remain as their primary caretaker 

subject only to Thomas’s reasonable supervised visitation.” Appellant’s brief uses the 

term “primary physical custody.” Because appellant has already been awarded physical 

care, we surmise that the prayer references a desire for sole legal custody and 

supervised visitation.
3

Pursuant to Iowa Court Rule 21.26(1)(e), we affirm the district court ruling

without further opinion. 

AFFIRMED.
# table29_q4.5_state
# table134_q14.6_state
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Bonnie G. Eckelberg, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Red Trail Energy, LLC;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andc) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated:September 15, 2006                                          /s/ Bonnie G. Eckelberg   Bonnie G. Eckelberg   Chief Financial Officer
# Field Descriptions

# 2013 Nonprofit Data
No. 23-2 For Immediate Release

April 2023

Sequestration Will Reduce Railroad Unemployment and Sickness

Benefits Due to End of COVID-19 National Emergency

The Budget Control Act of 2011, and a subsequent sequestration order to 

implement mandated cuts, requires that railroad unemployment and sickness insurance

benefits be reduced by a set percentage. However, effective January 3, 2021, the

Continued Assistance to Rail Workers Act of 2020 exempted those benefits from

sequestration until 30 days after the end of the national emergency related to the

COVID-19 pandemic.

With Congress passing legislation declaring an immediate end to the national 

emergency, which President Biden signed on April 10, 2023, sequestration will resume

for railroad unemployment and sickness benefits effective May 10, 2023.

Starting on that date, the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) will reduce

railroad unemployment and sickness insurance benefits by 5.7 percent, the reduction

amount at the time sequestration was temporarily suspended in 2021. The same 

reduction amount will remain in effect through September 30, 2031. 

The current daily benefit rate for both unemployment and sickness insurance

benefits is $85.00. Applying the sequestration reduction of 5.7 percent, the maximum

benefit in a 2-week period will be reduced from $850.00 to $801.55. Sickness benefits 

paid to an employee within six months from the date last worked for a reason other

than an on-the-job injury are also subject to regular tier I railroad retirement taxes,

resulting in a further reduction of 7.65 percent. Applying the 5.7 percent reduction to

these sickness benefits will result in a maximum 2-week total of $740.23.

# # #

U.S. Railroad Retirement Board

RRB News

844 North Rush Street Chicago, Illinois 60611-1275

RRB.gov

General Information: 877-772-5772

Public Affairs

Media Inquiries: opa@rrb.gov

312-751-4777
vs.

Plaintiff

SCOTT LOWERY LAW OFFICES,

P.C.

Defendant

)

33

)

)3

33

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that plaintiff, Becky Fielder, pursuant to Rule

41 (a)( I )(i) ofthe Rules of the United States District Court, hereby dismisses the action

captioned above, with prejudice.

BY: Is! Brent F. Vullins

Brent F. Vullings, Esquire

Attorney for Plaintiff

Attorney I.D. #92344Warren & Vullings, LLP

93 Old York Road

Jenkintown, PA 19046

215-745-9800
Case 2:10-cv-06303-WJM -MF Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/10 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 3
Case 2:10-cv-06303-WJM -MF Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/10 Page 2 of 12 PageID: 4
Case 2:10-cv-06303-WJM -MF Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/10 Page 3 of 12 PageID: 5
Case 2:10-cv-06303-WJM -MF Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/10 Page 4 of 12 PageID: 6
Case 2:10-cv-06303-WJM -MF Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/10 Page 5 of 12 PageID: 7
Case 2:10-cv-06303-WJM -MF Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/10 Page 6 of 12 PageID: 8
Case 2:10-cv-06303-WJM -MF Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/10 Page 7 of 12 PageID: 9
Case 2:10-cv-06303-WJM -MF Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/10 Page 8 of 12 PageID: 10
Case 2:10-cv-06303-WJM -MF Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/10 Page 9 of 12 PageID: 11
Case 2:10-cv-06303-WJM -MF Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/10 Page 10 of 12 PageID: 12
Case 2:10-cv-06303-WJM -MF Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/10 Page 11 of 12 PageID: 13
Case 2:10-cv-06303-WJM -MF Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/10 Page 12 of 12 PageID: 14
H. Res. 85 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 29, 2019. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION: Mr. Raskin, 

Mrs. Davis of California, Mr. Butterfield, Ms. Fudge, and 

Mr. Aguilar. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, ranked as follows on the following standing committee of the House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Higgins of New York 

(to rank immediately after Mr. Jeffries) and Mr. Brendan F. 

Boyle of Pennsylvania (to rank immediately after Mr. Higgins of New York). 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6689]

Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this matter, and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that there is a sufficient factual basis to find that the relevant circumstances described in section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (hereinafter “INA”) (8 U.S.C. 1189), exist with respect to Kata'ib Hizballah (and other aliases).

Therefore, I hereby designate that organization and its aliases as a foreign terrorist organization pursuant to section 219 of the INA.

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: June 24 2009.

James Steinberg,

Deputy Secretary of State, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-15661 Filed 7-1-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TERRENCE L. DANIELS,

Appellant

,

v.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, BARBARA

BROWDER, in her individual and official

capacities, SUSANA MARTINEZ, in her

individual and official capacities, AMY

ORLANDO, in her individual and official

capacities, SUSAN RIEDEL, in her

individual and official capacities, JAMES

DICKENS, in his individual and official

capacities, SCOT KEY, in his individual

and official capacities, KIRBY WILLS , in

his individual and official capacities,

PETER GIOVANNINNI, in his individual

and official capacities, MICHAEL CAIN,

in his individual and official capacities,

OSCAR FERRALEZ, in his individual and

official capacities, LISA KING, in her

individual and official capacities, BRIAN

FRAGA, in h is individual and official

capacities, ASHLEY MEEKS, in her

individual and official capacities, LAS

CRUCES SUN

- NEWS, KAREN

NOUGUES, in her individual and official

capacities, MICHELLE BALLARD, in her

individual and off

icial capacities,

ROBERT CONCHA, and VALERIE

CONCHA,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00060

- CV

Appeal from the

243rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2012DCV06543)J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the part

of the judgment granting the dismissal motions of Las Cruces Sun

- News, Ashley Meeks, and Brian

Fraga. We therefore reverse that part of the judgment and remand to the trial court for further

proceedings. We further conclude there was no error in the part of the judgment dismissing the

remainder of the Appellees.

It is further ordered that Appellant and Appellees each pay one

- half (1/2) the costs of this

appeal. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER , 2017.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Ro driguez, and Hughes, JJ.

Hughes, J., Not Participating
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Vail Resorts, Inc. (the “Company”) that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the periods covered by such Report.








Date: September 23, 2010





s/ ROBERT A. KATZRobert A. KatzChief Executive Officer








Date: September 23, 2010





/s/ JEFFREY W. JONESJeffrey W. JonesSenior Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer








This certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is not a part of the Form 10-K to which it refers, and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by each of the above signatories to the extent of his respective knowledge.  This certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Vail Resorts, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vail Resorts, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 14, 2010 | By: /s/ JEFFREY R. SMITH    |
|--------------------|-----------------------------|
|               | Jeffrey R. Smith, President |
|               | Chief Executive Officer     |

| Date: May 14, 2010 | By: /s/ JEFFREY R. SMITH    |
|--------------------|-----------------------------|
|               | Jeffrey R. Smith            |
|               | Principal Financial Officer |
IN THE 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

OF TEXAS 

JERROD DEMOUN PRESTON, 

PETITIONER § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

v. 

THE ST ATE OF TEXAS 

05-14-01131-CR 

05-14-01132-CR 

05-14-01133-CR 

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE 

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW 

COMES NOW JERROD DEMOUN PRESTON, through appointed counsel, moving 

the Court to extend the time to file his Petition for Discretionary Review, and would show the 

Court as follows: 

1. The appeal was decided by the Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas. 

2. The opinion of that Court was filed July 14, 2015. 

3. The style was Jerrod Demoun Preston v. The State of Texas, with three case 

numbers: 05-14-01131-CR; 05-14-01132-CR; and 05-1 4-01133-CR. 

4. No Motion for Rehearing was filed. 

5. The Petition is due to be filed August 13, 2015. 

6. An extension of30 days to September 12, 2015, is requested. 

7. No previous extension has been requested. 

PD-0926&0927&0928-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 7/22/2015 3:05:38 PM

Accepted 7/24/2015 9:49:38 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
I 

8. Counsel has three appellate briefs due between now and August 4, 2015, and 

needs additional time to properly research the issues involved in this proceeding. 

WHEREFORE, the undersigned prays this Court will extend the time to file his Petition 

for Discretionary Review to and including September 12, 2015. 

Respectfully 

~ 

submitted, 

ROBERT T. BASKETT 

State Bar No. 01871000 

6060 N. Central Expressway 

Suite 600 

Dallas Texas 75206-5209 

214/965-0900 

214/880-0443 [fax] 

Email: rtblaw@swbell.net 

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 

I certify that number of words in this Motion is 163 words. 

ROBERT T. BASKETT 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that a true copy of the following motion was served by regular mail and 

electronic mail to Mike Casillas, Assistant District Attorney, email address at: 

michael.casillas@dallascounty.org and mailing address to: 133 N. Riverfront Boulevard, Dallas, 

Texas, 75207-4399, on this the 22nd day of July, 2015. 

ROBERT T. BASKETT
No. 11-6 For Immediate Release

 May 2011 

RRB to Begin Withholding Medicare Part C and D Premiums 

Beginning with the premiums due for June 2011, the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) will 

be able to withhold premiums for Medicare Part C (Medicare Advantage Plans) and Medicare Part D 

(prescription drug plans) from benefit payments. Beneficiaries should contact their plans to request 

withholding of these premiums from their monthly benefit payments. 

Part C and Part D premiums vary according to the plan and provider. Beginning in 2011, the 

Affordable Care Act requires some Part D beneficiaries to also pay an additional monthly adjustment 

amount, depending on a beneficiary’s or married couple’s modified adjusted gross income. Under this 

new requirement, beneficiaries pay the regular premium to their Part D plan and the monthly 

adjustment amount directly to the RRB. 

While the RRB will be able to deduct the regular Part D premiums for individuals who elect to 

have them withheld from their benefit payments, Part D enrollees subject to the monthly adjustment 

amount will continue to receive a bill for that portion as the agency is unable to deduct those amounts 

from benefits at this time.

The Part D income-related monthly adjustment amounts are $12.00, $31.10, $50.10 or $69.10, 

depending on the extent to which an individual beneficiary’s modified adjusted gross income exceeds 

$85,000 or a married couple’s income exceeds $170,000. The highest amount is only paid by 

beneficiaries whose incomes are over $214,000 (or $428,000 for a married couple). The Social 

Security Administration determines if a monthly adjustment amount is due, based upon the most 

recent tax return information available from the IRS. 

The RRB has worked closely with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on 

implementation of Part C and Part D premium withholding, with the end result simplifying the 

withholding system so as to minimize the data exchange and processing required of both agencies.

The RRB is also reminding Medicare beneficiaries that, beginning in the fall of 2011, the annual 

enrollment period for Part C and Part D coverage will begin and end earlier. Effective this year,

 the annual enrollment period will be from October 15 to December 7. (Previously, it ran from 

November 15 to December 31.) However, changes and enrollments made during this period will still 

be effective on January 1 of the following year.

# # # 

RRB News

844 North Rush Street Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092

U.S. Railroad Retirement Board

www.rrb.gov

877-772-5772 general information

Public Affairs

312-751-4777 media inquiries
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - March 2005 

Benefit payments March 2005 March 2004 

Total $765,520,000 $749,589,000 

Retired employees 495,635,000 481,666,000 

Regular Retirement Spouses and divorced spouses 

and Survivor Benefits Widow(er)s - aged and disabled 

Other survivors 22,452,000 22,109,000 

90,993,000 89,624,000 

156,440,000 156,190,000 

Number Average1 Number Average1 

Total 602,700 ......... 2,700 ......... ......... 

Regular employee annuities, total 285,600 $1,712 1,100 $2,207 ......... 

Age 202,000 1,672 2 400 2 2,730 3 $1,245 

Disability, Full Retirement Age and Over 35,000 1,527 ......... ......... ......... 

Disability, Under Full Retirement Age 48,600 2,011 500 2,229 

Spouses and divorced spouses 141,200 638 800 710 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 148,100 1,047 700 1,392 

Widowed mothers and fathers 900 1,326 4/ 1,178 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 14,700 695 100 776 

Children 12,100 789 100 900 

Other survivors 100 757 ......... ......... ......... .........

5/ / 

628 644 

907 753 

682 687 

......... 

895 955 

465 336 

......... 

$958 

......... 

Being Paid Awarded 

Monthly benefits March 2005 

Average under 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded in 

month 

Social Security 

5

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement. 

Benefit payments 

March March 

2005 2004 Number Average 

$5,256,000 $5,386,000 124,600 $42 500 $41 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Number Average 

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 34); about 300 

other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis. 

4

Fewer than 50. 

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers. 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding 

Regular retirement and survivor benefit payments total includes hospital insurance benefits for services in Canada. 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

March 2005 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Unemployment 3,800 $276 

Sickness 6,100 277 

Unemployment 

Sickness 3,522,000 1,747,000 

$6,514,000 

3,281,000 4,768,000 

Total $6,803,000 

Benefit payments 

March 2005 March 2004 

$493 

485 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period 

Per 

full week 

Average payment 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited). Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. 

Recycled 

Paper 

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary
# table38_q5.2_state