alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                        0000812076
<NAME>                                       EX-27
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                Other
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            Feb-26-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               Feb-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 Feb-26-2000
<CASH>                                        75,853
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 49,351
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,415
<INVENTORY>                                   20,738
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             157,289
<PP&E>                                        15,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6,587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               226,934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         86,161
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         478
<OTHER-SE>                                   128,697
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 226,934
<SALES>                                      374,193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             377,474
<CGS>                                        195,358
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                280,096
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 471
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               813
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               96,564
<INCOME-TAX>                                  37,349
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           59,215
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  59,215
<EPS-BASIC>                                   1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   1.25



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 23.1

                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in post-effective Amendment No.
1 to Registration Statement No. 33-7053 on Form S-8 and in Registration
Statement No. 33-44700 on Form S-8 of our report Dated December 3, 1999
(which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
relating to Santa Fe Gaming Corporation's ability to continue as a going
concern) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santa Fe Gaming
Corporation for the year ended September 30, 1999.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Las Vegas, Nevada
December 28, 1999
Exhibit 4.1



Number                                                                   Shares

                        PURADYN FILTER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
COMMON STOCK                                                  CUSIP 746091 10 7

THIS CERTIFIES THAT
                    -----------------------------------------------------

is the registered Holder of _______________________________________Shares of the
Common Stock Par Value $.001 Per Share

fully paid and non-assessable, transferable only on the books of the Corporation
by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate
properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and
registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.

In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto
affixed this ____ day of _______, 20____.




----------------------------------            ----------------------------------
          SECRETARY                                       PRESIDENT



<PAGE>


For Value Received _________________________ hereby sell assign and transfer
unto


PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
  IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE

------------------------------------------


____________________________________________________________________ Shares
represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint ___________________________________________________________________
Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named
Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated
__________________ 20_____

         In presence of

----------------------------------           -----------------------------------
# table57_q7_size
S04Y1172.

#### IN THE MATTER OF JOHN L. HOWARD.

(607 SE2d 887)

Decided January 10, 2005.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, K. Gene Chapman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*Chilivis, Cochran, Larkins & Bever, John K. Larkins, Jr.,*for Howard.

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on Respondent John L. Howard’s Petition for Voluntary Surrender of License filed pursuant to Bar Rule 4-227 (b). A voluntary surrender of license is tantamount to disbarment pursuant to Bar Rule 4-110 (f). In his petition, Howard admits that in October 2001, he wilfully subscribed to a false income tax return in that he knew that the adjusted gross income to which he swore was substantially understated; that he subsequently pled guilty to the felony offense of false tax declaration in violation of 26 USC § 7206 (1) in the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Waycross Division; and that by virtue of his felony conviction, he violated Rule 8.4 (a) (2) (it shall be a violation of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct for a lawyer to be convicted of a felony) of Rule 4-102 (d) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct. The maximum penalty for a violation of Rule 8.4 (a) (2) is disbarment.

The State Bar has filed a response recommending that this Court accept Howard’s Petition for Voluntary Surrender of License and, after reviewing the record, we agree with that recommendation. Accordingly, for his violation of Rule 8.4 (a) (2), Howard’s Petition for Voluntary Surrender of License hereby is accepted. He is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Petition for voluntary surrender of license accepted.*

*All the Justices concur.*
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SEVENTH DISTRICT, AT AMARILLO

No. 07-12-00544-CV

Tracey H. Coomer

v.

Tamala K. Alvarez

(No. 600 IN COUNTY COURT OF HARTLEY COUNTY)

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

Motion fee

Motion fee

Motion fee

Motion fee

Motion fee

Indigent

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

Filing $10.00

$15.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$25.00

$50.00

$100.00 INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT Tracey Coomer

Balance of costs owing to the Seventh Court of Appeals, Amarillo, Texas: $0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per

the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, VIVIAN LONG, CLERK OF THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of

the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears

of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the

Seventh District of Texas on February 3, 2015

.



# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
Exhibit 10.7
 AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT
  WHEREAS
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE
  Redemption, Sale to Substitute Stockholder.




---



##### 



Conduct of Business Following Redemption.




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC
CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Robert C. KillTitle:
    
    President and Chief Executive OfficerVIRTUAL RADIOLOGICPROFESSIONALS OF TEXAS, P.A.By:
    
    /s/ Eduard Michel, M.D.Title:
    
    President/s/ Eduard Michel, M.D.Eduard Michel, M.D.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.28

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                         SEVERANCE PROTECTION AGREEMENT


         THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE PROTECTION AGREEMENT (the
"AMENDMENT") is effective as of the 1st day of June, 2000, by and between
Gadzooks Management, L.P. (the "COMPANY") and Gerald R. Szczepanski (the
"EXECUTIVE").

         WHEREAS, Gadzooks, Inc. and the Executive have entered into that
certain Severance Protection Agreement dated as of September 1, 1998 (the
"AGREEMENT"); and

         WHEREAS, as of June 2000, Gadzooks, Inc. completed a restructuring of
its organization whereby, among other things, it formed the Company and certain
employees of Gadzooks, Inc., including the Executive, became employees of the
Company; and

         WHEREAS, the parties now wish to amend the Agreement to reflect that
the Company is subject to and bound by the terms, conditions, covenants,
representations, agreements, rights and remedies set forth in the Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

         1. Amendment. Effective as of June 1, 2000, Gadzooks Management, L.P.
will replace Gadzooks, Inc. as the "Company" in the Agreement and will be
subject to and bound by the terms, conditions, covenants, representations,
agreements, rights and remedies set forth in the Agreement.

         2. Effect on Agreement. Except as specifically modified herein, the
Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.


                            [Signature Page Follows]


<PAGE>



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the parties
hereto as of the day and year first above written.


                                 GADZOOKS MANAGEMENT, L.P.

                                 By:      Gadzooks, Inc., its general partner


                                          By:      /s/ James A. Motley
                                                   -----------------------------
                                          Name:    James A. Motley
                                                   -----------------------------
                                          Title:   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   -----------------------------



                                 /s/ Gerald R. Szczepanski
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Gerald R. Szczepanski



                                 Gadzooks, Inc.


                                 By:      /s/ James A. Motley
                                          --------------------------------------
                                 Name:    James A. Motley
                                          --------------------------------------
                                 Title:   Chief Financial Officer
                                          --------------------------------------
Court of Appeals

First District

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas 77002-2066

SHERRY RADACK

 CHIEF JUSTICE

TERRY JENNINGS

EVELYN KEYES

LAURA CARTER HIGLEY

JANE BLAND

MICHAEL MASSENGALE

HARVEY BROWN

REBECA HUDDLE

RUSSELL LLOYD

 JUSTICES

 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT

JANET WILLIAMS

 CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

PHONE: 713-274-2700

FAX: 713-755-8131

 www.txcourts.gov/1stcoa.aspx

July 21, 2015

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 01-15-00440-CV 

Trial Court Case Number: 2010-64752

Style: In re Ernest Ray Koonce

This is to acknowledge your communication received July 21, 2015, with reference to your direct 

case. Please be advised that:

1. Our records indicate that on July 20, 2015, we received check #217 for your payment of 

$145.00 for the filing fee. Enclosed with this letter is the receipt for that payment.

2. We are returning the enclosed check for $145, check # 216.

Very truly yours,

Christopher A. Prine

Clerk of the Court
### NO. 01- 13

- 00838

- CR

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

FROM THE FIRST SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

FINLEY WRIGHT, APPELLANT

VS.

STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE



### MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

WITHIN WHICH TO FILE APPELLANT’S

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TERRENCE GAISER

LAWYER FOR APPELLANT (ON APPEAL ONLY) 2900 SMITH STREET, # 220 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77006
SBOT# 07572500

713/ 225-0666 tagaiser@aol.com PD-0284-15
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS
Transmitted 3/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Accepted 3/18/2015 11:42:04 AM

ABEL ACOSTA
CLERKNO. 1334182

STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE DI STRICT COURT

§

VS. § HARRIS COUNTY,TEXAS §

FINLEY WRIGHT § 174TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

WITHIN WHICH TO FILE APPELLANT’S

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

NOW COMES FINLEY WRIGHT, appellant in the above

- captioned

caus e, by and through his attorney, TERRENCE GAISER, and files his

Motion for Extension of Time Within Which to File Appellant’s Petition for

Discretionary Review; for which he would show:

1.) Appellant appeals from a judgment of guilt and forty year sentence for

the offense of aggravated sexual assault

2.) On February 12, 2015, a panel of the First Court of Appeals in Cause No.

01

- 13

- 00838

- CR, Finley Wright v. State of Texas, issued a memorandum

opinion affirming appellant’s judgment. No motion for rehearing was filed..

Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review is due on Monday, March 16,

2015. This is the first requested extension. Appellant requests a thirty

- day

extension to and including April 15, 2014.

3.) This extension is being sought for the fol lowing reasons:

After careful review of the opinion of the Court of Appeals and the transcript

of this case, in counsel’s professional opinion, further review of this casewould be frivolous and without further merit. Counsel has informed

appellant of his right to seek discretionary review, pro se , of this cause and

will inform appellant of this request for extension.

4.) Counsel will file a motion to withdraw as attorney of record in the First

Court of Appeals and will inform appellant, by copy of that motion, and that

he has a right to object to the motion.

WHEREFORE, premises considered, appellant prays for an extension

of time to file appellant’s petition for discretionary review to and including

April 15, 2015.

Respectfully Submitted,

/S/ Terrence A. Gaiser

TERRENCE GAISER

LAWYER FOR APPELLANT 2900 SMITH STREET, STE. 220 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77006 (713) 225

- 0666

SBN# 07572500 tagaiser@aol.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE ABOVE AND

FOREGOING MOTI ON FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN

WHICH TO FILE A PDR WAS SERVED ON ALL PARTIES

ACCORDING TO THE RULES.

/S/ Terrence A. Gaiser

TERRENCE GAISER
July 23, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CLIFFORD BAKER, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00852-CR

NO. 14-14-00853-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

February 27, 2003

Before

Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

No. 01-3745

JOANN CAVALIERI, AS PLENARY

GUARDIAN OF THE ESTATE OF

STEVEN CAVALIERI, A DISABLED

PERSON,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

DONALD SHEPARD,

Defendant-Appellant..

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Central District

of Illinois.

No. 99-CV-2121

Michael P. McCuskey, 

Judge.

O R D E R

The Opinion of this court issued on February 24, 2003 should be amended as follows:

Page 13, first paragraph, line 14, “Stephen’s” should read “Steven’s.”
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-60793

Summary Calendar

CRISTIAN ELMER REYES-REYES

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H HOLDER JR, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A99-676-754

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Having conceded removability, Cristian Elmer Reyes-Reyes, a citizen of

Guatemala, seeks review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals

(BIA) denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief

under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). The BIA’s factual findings are

reviewed under the substantial-evidence standard. E.g., Mikhael v. INS, 115

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 4, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-60793

2

F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997). Under that standard, “[t]he applicant has the

burden of showing that the evidence is so compelling that no reasonable

factfinder could reach a contrary conclusion”. Chen v. Gonzales, 470 F.3d 1131,

1134 (5th Cir. 2006) (citing Zhao v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 295, 306 (5th Cir. 2005)).

Among other things, Reyes has not demonstrated that he is a member of

any particular social group. See Mwembie v. Gonzales, 443 F.3d 405, 414-15 (5th

Cir. 2006); Sanchez-Trujillo v. INS, 801 F.2d 1571, 1576-77 (9th Cir. 1986).

Arguably, he has failed to adequately brief this factor. In any event, the BIA’s

denial of asylum and withholding of removal was supported by substantial

evidence. Mwembie, 443 F.3d at 414-15.

Reyes also fails to establish past torture or a probability of future torture

upon his return to Guatemala. Accordingly, substantial evidence supports the

BIA’s denial of relief under the CAT. See Ontunez-Tursios v. Ashcroft, 303 F.3d

341, 353-55 (5th Cir. 2002).

DENIED.
#### In the Matter of Dwayne McNally, Respondent, v Elizabeth McNally, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 907]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Martha E. Mulroy, A.J.), entered August 9, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among Other things, modified a prior custody order by awarding petitioner sole legal and residential custody of the subject child.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Scudder, EJ., Centra, Lindley, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 MARCH 22, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 10-12306 

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cv-00147-WS-N

LARRY A. ODOM, SR.,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Counter - 

Defendant - Appellant,

JUDY ODOM,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

SOUTHEAST SUPPLY HEADER, LLC,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Counter - 

Claimant - Appellee.

 ________________________

 No. 10-12610 

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cv-00147-WS-N

LARRY A. ODOM, SR.,

JUDY ODOM,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellees,

 versus

SOUTHEAST SUPPLY HEADER, LLC,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.

________________________

 Appeals from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Alabama

 ________________________

(March 22, 2011)

Before CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and SEITZ, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM:

Larry and Judy Odom appeal from the district court’s judgment for

Southeast Supply Header, LLC, but only insofar as it reformed the grant of

easement between the parties. Southeast Supply cross-appeals from the district

court’s judgment in favor of the Odoms on its counterclaim for abuse of process.

Having read the briefs, studied the relevant parts of the record, and heard

oral argument, we affirm the district court’s judgment reforming the grant of

easement, and its judgment on the abuse of process counterclaim on the basis of its

Honorable Patricia A. Seitz, United States District Judge for the Southern District of *

Florida, sitting by designation. 

2
well-reasoned orders of December 9, 2009 and April 29, 2010. To the thorough

discussions in those two orders, we have nothing to add.

AFFIRMED.

3
# table187_q19.1_naics
# covid_table54_c62_size_class
@article{1208126,
  author = {Christian P. Clear and Peter Uylings and Ton Raassen and Gillian Nave and Juliet C. Pickering},
  title = {New Ritz Wavelengths and Transition Probabilities for Parity-Forbidden, Singly Ionised Nickel [Ni ii] Lines of Astrophysical Interest Christian P.},
  year = {2022},
  number = {519},
  month = {2022-12-12 05:12:00},
  publisher = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=935246},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac3739},
  language = {en},
}