alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13-15-00286-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JESICA ALYS MASCORRO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of Aransas County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Jesica Alys Mascorro, attempts to appeal her conviction for possession 

of cocaine. The trial court has certified in these cases that this “is a plea-bargain case, 

and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
2

On July 1, 2015, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s 

certifications and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether 

appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings 

as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the 

existence of any amended certifications. On July 10, 2015, counsel filed a letter brief 

with this Court stating that she has reviewed the trial court’s file and appellant does not 

have the right to appeal. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed 

if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

23rd day of July, 2015.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 973 

Recognizing the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, commending a month of 

fasting and spiritual renewal, and extending best wishes to Muslims 

in the United States and across the globe for a joyous and meaningful 

observance of Eid al-Fitr. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2020 

Mrs. DINGELL (for herself, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. RUSH, Ms. OMAR, Ms. TLAIB, 

Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. PALLONE, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, and Mr. PASCRELL) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, commending a month of fasting and spiritual renewal, and 

extending best wishes to Muslims in the United States 

and across the globe for a joyous and meaningful observance of Eid al-Fitr. 

Whereas Ramadan is the holy month of fasting and spiritual 

renewal for Muslims worldwide; 

Whereas this month of sacrifice and contemplation began on 

the evening of Thursday, April 23, 2020, based on the 

visual sightings of the crescent moon; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 973 IH 

Whereas Muslims in the United States and around the world 

observe Ramadan by fasting, emphasizing self-discipline, 

worship, charity, and reading the Holy Quran to improve 

patience, humility, and spirituality; 

Whereas Ramadan continued until the evening of Saturday, 

May 23, 2020, with the celebration of Eid al-Fitr; 

Whereas Eid al-Fitr begins each year with the sighting of the 

new moon, signifying a month-long end to fasting and reflection for all Muslim followers; 

Whereas it is estimated that there are approximately 

1,800,000,000 Muslims worldwide; 

Whereas over 4,500 Muslims serve on active duty and over 

2,300 Muslims serve as selected reserve personnel in the 

United States Armed Forces; 

Whereas the Muslim population has been growing in the 

United States and today’s American Muslim population 

is a tapestry of ethnic, racial, linguistic, social, and economic groups; 

Whereas American Muslims have contributed to every part of 

society to make advancements in medicine, science, engineering, economics, sports, education, and the law; and 

Whereas the observance of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan has concluded with Eid al-Fitr, a three-day celebration: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) to demonstrate solidarity with and support 

3 for members of the community of Islam in the 

4 United States and throughout the world, the House 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 973 IH 

1 of Representatives recognizes the importance of the 

2 Islamic faith; and 

3 (2) in observance of and out of respect for 

4 Ramadan tradition, the Muslim holy month of fast5 ing and spiritual renewal, the House of Representa6 tives offers its best wishes to all Muslims celebrating 

7 Eid al-Fitr, the conclusion of Ramadan, while also 

8 expressing its deepest respect to Muslims in the 

9 United States and worldwide on this important occa10 sion. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
timeshare is limited to the school year, appellant receives an offset of 

additional time during the summer, and testimony before the district 

court indicated the older child's grades suffered because of the divorce, 

appellant is not involved with the child's education, and homework was 

not completed when the child was with appellant. Additionally, although 

appellant made allegations about a potential sex offender having access to 

the children, appellant presented no evidence establishing that the person 

was a sex offender or that the district court's custody schedule would put 

the children in contact with that person. 

Appellant also challenges his $250-per-month child support 

obligation, arguing that the district court incorrectly calculated his income 

and failed to consider that respondent was living rent-free. The district 

court found appellant's testimony about his income not credible and based 

the child support amount on what it found to be appellant's actual income. 

This court will not reweigh conflicting evidence or assess witness 

credibility, Ellis, 123 Nev. at 152, 161 P.3d at 244, and here, substantial 

evidence supports the district court's finding regarding appellant's income, 

see id. at 149, 161 P.3d at 242. As to appellant's argument that 

respondent's rent-free residence should have been considered when 

calculating child support, living rent-free does not affect gross income and 

is thus irrelevant under the statutory formula for calculating child 

support. See NRS 125B.070 (defining gross income and providing 

presumptive child support amounts based on gross income). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 
Finally, appellant argues that the district court abused its 

discretion when it granted respondent exclusive possession of the marital 

home and ordered her to make her best efforts to remove appellant from 

the mortgage. We conclude that the district court order is unclear as to 

the parties' respective interests in the marital home and associated 

mortgage obligation, and we remand for clarification of the divorce decree 

as to this issue. We affirm the divorce decree in all other respects. 

It is so ORDERED. 

J. 

Piek.(24 clip , 

Pickering 

J. 

cc: Hon. Vincent Ochoa, District Judge 

Lansford W. Levitt, Settlement Judge 

Prokopius & Beasley 

Black & LoBello 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) (947A e
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED**

 

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of VirtualRadiologic Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed inthe Report.

 
| Date:  | July 31, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Leonard C. Purkis   |
|--------|--------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |               |   | Leonard C. Purkis       |
|   |               |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Jerome B. Eisenberg, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ORBCOMM Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 14, 2007       /s/ Jerome B. Eisenberg     Name: Jerome B. Eisenberg  Title: Chairman of the Board and ChiefExecutive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
# Result 9
## 1997 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

1-6-1997 

# V i l l a n uev a v . B r o w n

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : D ock e t 95-5072

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1997

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1997 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" V i l l a n ue v a v . B r o w n " (1997). 1997 D e cisio n s . P a pe r 6. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1997/6

## UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 95-5072

JACK VILLANUEVA, ADMINISTRATOR PENDENTE LITE

OF THE ESTATE OF ELLA OSTROFF, Appellant v. G. MICHAEL BROWN; GUY MICHAEL; BROWN & MICHAEL;

GREENBERG MARGOLIS

v. HELEN CONN; SAMUEL RUBIN; JOSEPH RUBINSTEIN Third Party Defendant

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

(Civil No. 92-CV-02268)

Argued MARCH 22, 1996 Before: BECKER and McKEE, Circuit Judges , and

POLLAK, District Judge * 

## ORDER AMENDING OPINION FILED JANUARY 8, 1997

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Slip Opinion filed in this case on January 8, 1997, be amended as follows: On page 5, first paragraph, second sentence, add the name "Rubinstein" after "However,"; and On page 24, under subsection VI, delete the word "vacate"

* 

## The Honorable Louis H. Pollak, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

## and replace it with "reverse".

IT IS SO ORDERED. By the Court:

/s/ Theodore A. McKee
Theodore A. McKee Circuit Judge

Dated: January 8, 1997
FILED 

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 August 1, 2005 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 04-16549

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-20240-CR-DLG

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

FREDDY DEJESUS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(August 1, 2005)

Before BLACK, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

David J. Joffe, counsel for Freddy DeJesus in this direct criminal appeal, has
2

moved to withdraw from further representation of appellant and filed a brief

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493

(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and DeJesus’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.
______________________________________________________________________________ 

Motion for Continuance Page 1 of 2 

NO. 06-15-00047-CR

__________________________________________________________________________ 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE 

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

AT TEXARKANA, TEXAS 

___________________________________________________________________________ 

MILTON EDWARD GRIGGS APELLANT 

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

___________________________________________________________________________ 

APPEAL IN CAUSE NUMBER CR1401075

IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW #1 

OF HUNT COUNTY, TEXAS 

JUDGE TIMOTHY S. LINDEN PRESIDIING 

__________________________________________________________________________ 

APPELLEE’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS: 

 

 NOW COMES, Peter Gieseking, Appellee and Attorney for the State, makes and files 

this Motion for Extension and would respectfully show the following: 

I.

Appellee’s Brief is due July 15, 2015. The request for extension is made for the 

following reason: The prior assistant county attorney in which this appeal was assigned to is no 

longer with this office and I, Peter Gieseking, just received notice of the appeal today through a 

forwarded email from the former employee. I just contacted the 6th Court of Appeals today, July 

ACCEPTED

061500047CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

7/17/2015 2:26:15 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 7/17/2015 2:26:15 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
______________________________________________________________________________

Motion for Continuance Page 2 of 2

17th, 2015 and received a copy of the Anders and Pro-Se briefs through the 6th Court of Appeals 

and have not had a chance to review them. 

II.

Appellee moves for a 30 day extension in this matter. This Motion for Extension is in the 

interest of justice and not for the purpose of delay.

WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellee prays the Court grant this, its 

Motion for Extension, in the above numbered cause.

Respectfully submitted,

____/S/___Peter Gieseking_________

Peter Gieseking

Assistant Hunt County Attorney

State Bar No. 24081640

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion for Extension was served on counsel 

for Appellant.

___/S/___Peter Gieseking________

Peter Gieseking
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 866 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 866

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 27, 2020.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2339) to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act with respect to the sale and marketing of tobacco products, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by 
the Committee on Energy and Commerce now printed in the bill, an amendment in 
the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 116-
51, modified by the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 
amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in 
the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final 
passage without intervening motion except: (1) 90 minutes of debate equally 
divided among and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce and the chair and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# Result 8.1
Exhibit 32.1

CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Westway
Group, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |        |  |                                                                   
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  |  |        |  | /s/ Peter J.M. Harding                                            
|                       |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Peter J.M. Harding                                                
|                       |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) and Director
|                       |  |  |  |        | 
|Dated: August 10, 2009 |  |  |  |        |  |
RECEIVED IN

•_^ COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUL 24 2015

AbelAcosla,Clerk

4tc res r0^ o^r^b u ^*ti^ rfffrvs P4.-J.^ D*crU'*»g rc^^rj

FILED IN / i/ // /9UC7&

COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS

JUL 27 2015

Abel Acosta, Cierk

>/- * <ji—
CSINIB02/CINIB02 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

'MI59/KST5757 IN-FORMA-PAUPERIS DATA

TDCJ#: 01961670 SID#: 03555414 LOCATION: MICHAEL

07/21/15

07:34:19

INDIGENT DTE: 06/11/15

NAME: FERGUSON,LUTHER CARL

PREVIOUS TDCJ NUMBERS: 00426969

CURRENT BAL: 0.00 TOT HOLD AMT

6MTH DEP: 518.81 6MTH AVG BAL

MONTH HIGHEST BALANCE TOTAL DEPOSITS

06/15 51.67 0.00

05/15 100.02 100.00

04/15 177.55 50.00

BEGINNING PERIOD: 01/01/15

0.00 3MTH TOT DEP:

52.45 6MTH AVG DEP:

MONTH HIGHEST BALANCE TOTAL DEPOSITS

03/15 219.85 200.00

02/15 94.75 94.75

01/15 50.00 74.06

PROCESS DATE HOLD AMOUNT HOLD DESCRIPTION

150.00

86.47

STATE OF TEXASCOUNTY OF'QjY^JAf^^ ON THIS THE^L^DAY OF ^•U^p^rrTCERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT IS ATRUE,

COMPLETE,AND UNALTERED COPY MADE BY ME OF INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE

COMPUTER DATABASE REGARDING THE OFFENDER'S ACCOUNT. NP SIG:

PF1-HELP PF3-END-JNTER NEXT TDCJ NUMBER: OR SID NUMBER:

"NOTARY WrfbouV BONCT
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 21, 2015

No. 04-14-00275-CV

Adriana P. PEREZ,

Appellant

v.

WEBB COUNTY,

Appellee

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CVT000305 D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

A majority of the justices who participated in the panel’s decision of the case denies 

Webb County’s motion for rehearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.3.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 30, 2015

No. 04-15-00364-CR

Joe William MEURET, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The State /s

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-CRD-07

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received 

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellee’s brief 

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to November 30, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Rumaldo Solis Jr.

400 E Gravis

PO Drawer 1061

San Diego, TX 78384

David D. Towler

Law Office of David D. Towler

410 E. Collins

P.O. Box 569

San Diego, TX 78384-2908
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-13-00738-CV

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 2010-00373

Style: Chris Wilmot

v Harry A. Bouknight, Junior

Date motion filed*: April 27, 2015

Type of motion: Motion to dissolve stay

Party filing motion: Appellee

Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? NO

It is ordered that motion to dissolve this Court’s stay is granted. Accordingly, the stay of trial court 

proceedings created by our March 6, 2014 order is lifted. 

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes.

 Acting individually 

Date: July 28, 2015