alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
May 15, 2015 www.bls.gov

BLS Technical Advisory Committee Agenda

Bureau of Labor Statistics 

Conference Center, Rooms 1-3 

2 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20212 

8:30 Commissioner’s welcome and review of agency developments

9:00 Current Employment Statistics (CES) Survey Review of Benchmarking Methodology and Goals 

 Presenter: Ken Robertson 

Discussant: Bart Hobijn

 

10:15 Break 

10:30 CES Survey Review of Benchmarking Methodology and Goals, continued 

Discussant: Bruce Meyer 

11:15 Updates on topics from past committee meetings 

• The National Compensation Survey and the Affordable Care Act 

Presenter: Jeff Schildkraut 

• Actuarial Values of Employer Sponsored Health Insurance Plans 

Presenter: Tom Moehrle 

12:15 Lunch 

1:30 Discussion of future priorities

 

2:00 Using Form 5500 Series Data to Improve BLS Data on Employee Benefits 

Presenter: Keenan Dworak-Fisher 

2:45 Break 

3:00 Using Form 5500 Series Data to Improve BLS Data on Employee Benefits, continued 

Discussants: Frank Stafford, Steve Heeringa 

4:00 Approximate conclusion
#### Estate of David S. Golden, Deceased, Respondent, v Shirley Golden, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 767]

*344Claims that accrued prior to September 2000 were either precluded by our prior orders (see *Golden v Golden,*228 AD2d 184 [1996], *Iv dismissed in part and denied in part*89 NY2d 963 [1997]; 235 AD2d 224 [1997], *Iv dismissed*90 NY2d 929 [1997]) or were untimely. Reimbursement claims that accrued between September 2000 and the former husband’s death in August 2003 were barred by the failure to show compliance with the required notice or that notice was waived; alimony arrears claims were unsupported. Claims accruing thereafter were not viable for failure to demonstrate a clear intention to make the estate responsible for the former husband’s obligations upon his death *(see Matter of Riconda,*90 NY2d 733, 737-739 [1997]).

We have considered appellant’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Andrias, Williams and McGuire, JJ.
# table2a_q1_state

# table2b_q1_state

# table2c_q1_state

# table2d_q1_state

# table2e_q1_state

# table2f_q1_state
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM
10-QSB FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       7,420,270
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         498,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             9,347,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 39,474,647
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    103,933,256
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,792,862
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             165,808,572
<DEPOSITS>                                 140,293,658
<SHORT-TERM>                                 9,865,528
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            351,926
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,860,674
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,436,786
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             165,808,572
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,581,361
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,235,967
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               301,303
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,118,631
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,804,409
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,070,360
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,048,271
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  300,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (25,781)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,028,404
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 93,546
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      93,546
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   101,713
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.91
<LOANS-NON>                                    951,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   216,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                             11,000,209
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,649,815
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  304,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   147,047
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,792,862
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,655,586
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        137,276


</TABLE>
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - January 2008 

Benefit payments January 2008 January 2007 

Regular Retirement 

and Survivor Benefits 

Total 

Retired employ

Spouses and d

Widow(er)s - a

Other survivors 

ees 

ivorced spouses 

ged and disabled 

$834,146,000 

552,542,000 

101,077,000 

157,379,000 

23,147,000 

$806,655,000 

529,928,000 

96,632,000 

157,177,000 

22,918,000 

Average under 

Being paid Awarded in Social Security 

Monthly benefits end of month month January 2008 

Number Average1 Number Average1 Being Paid Awarded 

Total 571,300 ......... 2,800 ......... ......... .........

Regular employee annuities, total 276,500 $1,976 1,200 $2,640 ......... .........

 Age 192,300 1,942 2 600 2 3,082 $1,081 3 $1,536

 Disability, Full Retirement Age and Over 34,100 1,757 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Disability, Under Full Retirement Age 50,200 2,252 300 2,522 1,004 1,044 

Spouses and divorced spouses 136,900 728 900 924 516 386 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 131,800 1,189 600 1,560 1,021 960 

Widowed mothers and fathers 800 1,471 4/ 1,138 770 763 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 14,200 796 100 899 5/ 5/ 

Children 11,000 875 4/ 803 706 721 

Other survivors 100 675 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Benefit payments 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

January 

2008 

$5,083,000 

January 

2007 

$5,107,000 

Number 

121,000 

Average 

$42 

Number 

700 

Average 

$41 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement. 

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 35); some 300

 other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis. 

4

Fewer than 50. 

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers. 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. 

Regular retirement and survivor benefit payments total includes hospital insurance benefits for services in Canada. 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

January 2008 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Average payment 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period

 Per

 full week 

Unemployment 4,600 $506 $292 

Sickness 5,800 513 

January 2008 

293 

Benefit payments 

January 2007 

Unemployment

Total

4,878,000 

$8,057,000 

7,710,000 

$12,631,000 

Sickness 3,179,000 4,920,000 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited). Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary 

Recycled

 Paper
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

SYDRIC REVON REYNOLDS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3807

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed April 17, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Hillsborough County; Vivian T. 

Corvo, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Cotto v. State, 139 So. 3d 283 (Fla. 2014); Robinson v. 

State, 793 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 2001); Ellis v. State, 762 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 2000); State v. 

Harris, 356 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 1978); Lopez v. State, 135 So. 3d 539 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); 

Williams v. State, 129 So. 3d 453 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Calloway v. State, 914 So. 2d 12 

(Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Tillman v. State, 900 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Martin v. 

State, 888 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Cruz v. State, 189 So. 3d 822 (Fla. 4th DCA 

2015); Culp v. State, 141 So. 3d 1279 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Dinkens v. State, 976 So. 

2d 660 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); Luton v. State, 934 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

KELLY, VILLANTI, and BADALAMENTI,JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 23.1
   (1)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-29038) pertaining to the Sovereign Bancorp, Inc.
Retirement Plan,
 (2)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-78474) pertaining to the Sovereign Bancorp, Inc. 1993
Stock Option Plan,
 (3)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-05309) pertaining to the Sovereign Bancorp, Inc.
1996 Stock Option Plan,
 (4)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-64530) pertaining to the Sovereign Bancorp, Inc.
2001 Stock Incentive Plan,
 (5)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-112825) pertaining to the First Essex Bancorp, Inc.
1987 Stock Option Plan, the First Essex Bancorp, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, and the First
Essex Bancorp, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan,
 (6)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-115528) pertaining to the Sovereign Bancorp, Inc.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Sovereign Bancorp, Inc. 2004 Broad-Based Stock Incentive
Plan and the Sovereign Bancorp, Inc. Bonus Recognition and Retention Plan,
 (7)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-117621) pertaining to the Seacoast Financial
Services Corporation 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, the Seacoast Financial Services Corporation
1999 Stock Incentive Plan, the Abington Bancorp, Inc. 2000 Incentive and Nonqualified Stock
Option Plan, the Abington Bancorp, Inc. 1997 Incentive and Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, the
Abington Bancorp, Inc. 1986 Incentive and Nonqualified Stock Option Plan and the Massachusetts
Fincorp, Inc. 1999 Stock-Based Incentive Plan,
 (8)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-122274) pertaining to the Waypoint Financial Corp.
Retirement Savings Incentive Plan, the Waypoint Financial Corp. 2001 Stock Option Plan, the
Harris Financial, Inc. 1999 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the Harris Financial, Inc. 1999 Stock
Option Plan for Outside Directors, the York Financial Corp. 1997 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan, the Harris Savings Bank 1996 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the York Financial Corp. 1995
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan for Directors, the Harris Savings Bank 1994 Incentive Stock
Option Plan, the Harris Savings Bank 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors, and the
York Financial Corp. Non-Incentive Stock Option Plan for Directors,
 (9)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-134976) pertaining to the Independence Community
Bank Corp. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and Trust
 (10)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-130060) of Sovereign Bancorp, Inc.
 (11)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-143515) of Sovereign Bancorp, Inc., and
 (12)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-144700) pertaining to the Sovereign Bancorp, Inc.
2006 Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00095-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.B., a Child

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-PA-00469

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order of termination is 

AFFIRMED. 

We order that no costs be assessed against appellant Father or appellant Mother as both are 

indigent. 

SIGNED July 22, 2015.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

                    By Notice dated September 22, 2008, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 29, 2008, (73 FR 56612), Johnson Matthey Inc., Custom Pharmaceuticals Department, 2003 Nolte Drive, West Deptford, New Jersey 08066-1742, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (2010), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule I.                

The company plans to produce sodium oxybate for sale to customers.

One objection was received; however, the objector is not registered with DEA as a bulk manufacturer of Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB). DEA has determined that the objection received is without merit and does not warrant denial of the application. DEA has also determined that the Food and Drug Administration does not preclude the sale of GHB to other manufacturers for the development of generic GHB products.

DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Johnson Matthey Inc. to manufacture the listed basic class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Johnson Matthey Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed.

Dated: June 23, 2009.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-15447 Filed 6-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00105-CV

Richard Allen Nicholson and Helena 

Mary Nicholson

v.

CitiMortgage, Inc.

§

§

§

§

From the 362nd District Court

of Denton County (14-08061-362)

July 16, 2015

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
****EXHIBIT 32.2****

 

****Certificationof Periodic Financial Report****

****Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350****

 

Forpurposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Dannette Boyd, the ChiefFinancial Officer of Integrated Management Information, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

 
|   | (i)    | the  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period  ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | (ii)   | the  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                             |

 
| Date:  August 13, 2008             |
|-----------------------------------------|
|                                    |
| /s/  Dannette Boyd                      |   |
| Dannette  Boyd, Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
ELECTRONIC RECORD fV? ~/S*

COA #14-14-00521-CR

STYLE: Gary Ishmael Bolin v The State of Texas

COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed

DATE: March 19, 2015 Publish: No

OFFENSE: Aggravated Assault

COUNTY: Harris

TRIAL COURT: 209th District Court

TC CASE #: 1377493

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STYLE: Gary Ishmael Bolin v The State of Texas

CCA# •

APPBLLAHT^S Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: 'OAWhr

JUDGE: A T

(M U't'U^K

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:.

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

PC:

DNP:

FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Petitioner

 v.

DOUGLAS A. KEYS,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 45 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1241

MARK DOUGLAS BROOKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DADMA LYDIA DIAZ C; JUDGE LAWRENCE HAMMOND; KRISTY M. NEWTON, 

DA; CANDACE E. SILER; JUDGE REGINA M. JOE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, 

District Judge. (1:14-cv-00794-TDS-LPA)

Submitted: July 21, 2015 Decided: July 23, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Douglas Brooks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Mark Douglas Brooks appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) 

(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss 

the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks 

v. Diaz C, No. 1:14-cv-00794-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Feb. 19, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SGS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the
Report), the undersigned each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                  
|----------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |  |  | 
|November 14, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  | /S/    HENRY R.
BAUGHMAN                                         
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Henry R. Baughman Chief Executive Officer, President and
Director
|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                  
|                  |  |  | 
|November 14, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  | /S/    JAMES M.
DAHMUS                                           
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | James M. Dahmus Chief Financial
Officer