alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.6


                  THOMAS, KAYDEN, HORSTEMEYER & RISLEY, L.L.P.
                                ATTORNEYS AT LAW


                               September 11, 2001


Mr. Daniel Bivins
CYBERCARE, INC.
2500 Quantum Lakes Drive
Suite 1000
Boynton Beach, Florida 33426

       RE:   Current Outstanding Balance (50320)


Dear Danny:

      Pursuant to our telephone conversation of today, our understanding is that
we have agreed upon the following terms and conditions with regard to past due
balances owed to our firm:

(1)    The total amount due between April 5, 2001 and August 5, 2001 is
       $131,165.73;

(2)    We agree to accept CyberCare shares in the amount of $90,000.00, in
       accordance with the terms of your letter of September 4, 2001, leaving a
       balance due of $41,165.73;

(3)    CyberCare will forward us a check in the amount of $41,165.73, which is
       the remainder of the accounts receivable due between April 5 and August
       5, 2001; and

(4)    CyberCare will pay all future fees and expenses incurred on a monthly
       basis.

       If you do not agree with the above terms and conditions, please let me
know immediately. Otherwise, we will expect the stock registration shortly and a
check from you for the remainder of the balance due as soon as possible.


                                Very truly yours,

                                THOMAS, KAYDEN, HORSTEMEYER
                                      & RISLEY, L.L.P.


                                /s/ Scott A. Horstemeyer
                                Scott A. Horstemeyer


    SUITE 1750, 100 GALLERIA PARKWAY, NW., ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30339-5948 U.S.A.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 693 

Authorizing the Director of the Office of Diversity and Inclusion and the 

Director of the Office of the Whistleblower Ombudsman to each appoint 

and fix the pay of employees of their respective Offices. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2019 

Ms. LOFGREN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the Director of the Office of Diversity and Inclusion and the Director of the Office of the Whistleblower 

Ombudsman to each appoint and fix the pay of employees of their respective Offices. 

1 Resolved, That, pursuant to regulations issued by the 

2 Committee on House Administration— 

3 (1) the Director of the Office of Diversity and 

4 Inclusion established under section 104(d) of House 

5 Resolution 6 may appoint and fix the pay of employ6 ees of the Office; and 

7 (2) the Director of the Office of the Whistle8 blower Ombudsman established under section 104(e) 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 693 IH 

1 of House Resolution 6 may appoint and fix the pay 

2 of employees of the Office. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-85866, 333-63855, 333-34197 and 333-34050) pertaining to
the Atlantis Plastics, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan, the Atlantis Plastics,
Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan, the Atlantis Plastics, Inc. 1997 Stock Option
Plan and the Atlantis Plastics, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan of our report
dated February 20, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Atlantis Plastics, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Atlanta, Georgia
March 25, 2003
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

7/22/2015 COA Case No. 02-14-00293-CR

PERRY, MICHAEL WAYNE Tr. Ct. No. 1302260D PD-0907-15

On this day, this Court has granted the Appellant’s Pro Se motion for an extension

of time in which to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. The time to file the

petition has been extended to Friday, September 11, 2015. NO FURTHER

EXTENSIONS WILL BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition For Discretionary

Review must be filed with The Court of Criminal Appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

MICHAEL WAYNE PERRY

TDC# 1941592

MCCONNELL UNIT

3001 S. EMILY DR.

BEEVILLE, TX 78102

FILE COPY
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

7/22/2015 COA Case No. 02-14-00293-CR

PERRY, MICHAEL WAYNE Tr. Ct. No. 1302260D PD-0907-15

On this day, this Court has granted the Appellant’s Pro Se motion for an extension

of time in which to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. The time to file the

petition has been extended to Friday, September 11, 2015. NO FURTHER

EXTENSIONS WILL BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition For Discretionary

Review must be filed with The Court of Criminal Appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

LISA MCMINN

STATE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY

P.O. BOX 13046

AUSTIN, TX 78711

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

FILE COPY
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

7/22/2015 COA Case No. 02-14-00293-CR

PERRY, MICHAEL WAYNE Tr. Ct. No. 1302260D PD-0907-15

On this day, this Court has granted the Appellant’s Pro Se motion for an extension

of time in which to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. The time to file the

petition has been extended to Friday, September 11, 2015. NO FURTHER

EXTENSIONS WILL BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition For Discretionary

Review must be filed with The Court of Criminal Appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

DISTRICT ATTORNEY TARRANT COUNTY

SHAREN WILSON

401 WEST BELKNAP

FORT WORTH, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

FILE COPY
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

7/22/2015 COA Case No. 02-14-00293-CR

PERRY, MICHAEL WAYNE Tr. Ct. No. 1302260D PD-0907-15

On this day, this Court has granted the Appellant’s Pro Se motion for an extension

of time in which to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. The time to file the

petition has been extended to Friday, September 11, 2015. NO FURTHER

EXTENSIONS WILL BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition For Discretionary

Review must be filed with The Court of Criminal Appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

2ND COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

DEBRA SPISAK

401 W. BELKNAP, STE 9000

FORT WORTH, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

FILE COPY
#### Daryl L. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11-36026.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 8, 2012.*

Filed Nov. 23, 2012.

Michael A. Bliven, Esquire, Anderson & Bliven, Kalispell, MT, Paul Bradford Eag-lin, Eaglin Law Office, Fairbanks, AK, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Michael Arlen Thomas, Esquire, Assistant Regional Counsel, Robert Louis Van Saghi, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel, Region VIII, Denver, CO, Leif Johnson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: RIPPLE **, TROTT, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Kenneth F. Ripple, Senior Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Because the facts and circumstances of this case are known to the parties, we refer to them only as necessary to explain our decision.

Jones asserts that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) fatally erred by failing to determine at step 2 of the familiar sequential evaluation analysis whether Jones (1) had a severe mental impairment, and (2) if so, whether that impairment met or equaled any of the listed impairments. The record conclusively refutes this claim. The ALJ did adequately perform the requisite step 2 analysis, saying he would discuss his step 2 findings “in more detail at findings number 3, 4, and 5.” The district court was correct when it eonclud-*677ed that “[although the ALJ did not adequately document his application of the special technique in his step two analysis, he included the requisite findings and conclusions in his step three analysis.” Thus, no substantive analytical error occurred, and *Keyser v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin.,*648 F.3d 721 (9th Cir.2011) is inapposite.

We also conclude that the ALJ did not err in considering “the circumstances under which [Dr. Mahoney’s] report was obtained and its consistency with other reports, records, or findings” with respect to evaluating the reliability of his report. *Reddick v. Chater,*157 F.3d 715, 726 (9th Cir.1998).

We further conclude that the record supports the ALJ’s decision not to give controlling or great weight to Dr. Johnson’s opinion because the ALJ reasonably found that the treatment notes reflecting a conservative course of treatment provided little in the way of support for Dr. Johnson’s conclusory statement regarding Jones’s ability to work. *See Bayliss v. Barnhart,*427 F.3d 1211, 1216 (9th Cir.2005). The ALJ’s opinion gives “specific and legitimate” reasons for discounting Dr. Johnson’s opinion based on substantial evidence. *Lester v. Chater,*81 F.3d 821, 830-31 (9th Cir.1995). Thus, we also conclude that the ALJ’s assessment of Jones’s residual functional capacity was supported by substantial evidence.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

AF 14-0356

_________________

JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION RULES O R D E R

________________

Pursuant to Article VII, Section 11 of the Montana Constitution, § 3-1-1105(2), 

MCA, authorizes, the Judicial Standards Commission to make rules for the conduct of its 

affairs consistent with Title 3, chapter 1, part 11, MCA. In January of 2015, on behalf of 

the Commission, we made available for public comment revised Judicial Standards 

Commission Rules as proposed by the Commission. No comments were filed during the 

comment period. Following additional review, the Commission made several 

non-substantive corrections and clarifications, and now has submitted its final proposal to 

revise and clarify the rules. The process having concluded,

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court is directed to file the revised 

Rules as adopted by the Judicial Standards Commission. The Clerk is further directed to 

provide notice of the revised rules to the State Law Library for inclusion on the 

Commission’s website; to Thomson Reuters; to LexisNexis; and to the State Bar of 

Montana, with the request that the State Bar provide notice of the new rules on its 

website and in the Montana Lawyer. 

The Clerk shall provide a copy of this Order to the Chair of the Judicial Standards 

Commission.

DATED this 23rd day of July, 2015.

For the Court,

/S/ MIKE McGRATH

July 23 2015

Case Number: AF 14-0356
#### Board of Education of the Olentangy Local School District, Appellant, *v.*Delaware County Board of Revision et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *Bd. of Edn. of the Olentangy Local School Dist. v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Revision,*111 Ohio St.3d 1213, 2006-Ohio-5605.]

*1214(No. 2005-2340

Submitted August 9, 2006

Decided November 1, 2006.)

Rich, Crites & Dittmer, L.L.C., Mark H. Gillis, Jeffrey A. Rich, and Kelley A. Gorry, for appellant.

Sleggs, Danzinger & Gill Co., L.P.A., and Robert K. Danzinger, for appellee 8288 Green Meadows Drive (Columbus) Associates, L.L.C.

{¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, on the authority of *Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision,*110 Ohio St.3d 1242, 2006-Ohio-4091, 852 N.E.2d 178.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J.,

dissents for the reason stated in his dissent in *Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision,*110 Ohio St.3d 1242, 2006-Ohio-4091, 852 N.E.2d 178, ¶ 5.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          5,666,000
<SECURITIES>                                    3,017,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  49,753,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    3,404,000
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               59,352,000
<PP&E>                                          8,611,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  4,074,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                156,870,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          38,746,000
<BONDS>                                        53,929,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       30,731,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     29,425,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  156,870,000
<SALES>                                       207,416,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              207,416,000
<CGS>                                         144,187,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 184,085,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              3,381,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                21,875,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    8,901,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            12,974,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                         776,000
<NET-INCOME>                                   12,198,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.71
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Jerome B. Eisenberg, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ORBCOMM Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: November 14, 2007         /s/ Jerome B. Eisenberg   Name:  Jerome B. Eisenberg                                                    Title:  Chairman of the Board and
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50390 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. GABRIEL GAITAN-TOVALLES, also known as Gabriel Gaitan Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-515-1 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Gabriel Gaitan-Tovalles raisesarguments that areforeclosed by Almendarez-Torresv. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. U nited Statesv. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November 8, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-50390

2 Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and thejudgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**CERTIFICATION OF      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND      PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | 1. | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September                30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the period ending September 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                United Nations Securities Associations,                Inc. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Lord Dr. Masaaki Ikawa  |
|--------------------------------------------|
| Lord Dr. Masaaki Ikawa      |
| Chief Executive Officer and |
| Principal Financial Officer      |

----
##### 



Exhibit 10.1
  AMENDMENT
TO THE
MASTER LOAN AGREEMENT
 THIS AMENDMENT FARM CREDIT SERVICES OF AMERICA,
FLCA WESTERN IOWA ENERGY, LLC, Wall Lake, Iowa
 BACKGROUND
    SECTION 10. Negative Covenants.
 (H) Capital Expenditures.
 (I) Profit Distribution.
  SECTION 10. Negative Covenants.
 (K) Leases.




---



##### 



SECTION I1, Financial Covenants.
 (A) Working Capital.
 (B) Net Worth.
  IN WITNESS WIIEREOF,
 FARM CREDIT SERVIES OF AMERICA, FLCA
    
    WESTERN IOWA ENERGY, LLCBy:
    
    /s/ Shane Frahm
    
    By:
    
    /s/ William J. HoranTitle:
    
    Vice President
    
    Title:
    
    Chair
WR-83,446-01 

T.C. NO. 970D11232 

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

OF TEXAS 

EX PARTE: 

 

BENJAMIN ELIAS 

APPLICANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION/REHEARING

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: 

COMES NOW, the Applicant, Benjamin Elias and files his Motion for 

Reconsideration/Rehearing. Applicant would show the Court the following: 

(a) On June 12, 2015, the Court received Applicant’s writ application.

(b) On July 8, 2015, the Court denied relief without a written order. 

(c) On June 25, 2015, the trial court (Hon. Luis Aguilar, 243rd District Court) 

issued a bench warrant for purposes of an evidentiary hearing to be held on 

July 15, 2015. 

(d) The evidentiary hearing was actually conducted on July 16, 2015.

(e) At the hearing, the State notified the Court and Applicant that relief had 

already been denied by the Court of Criminal Appeals. 

(f) Undersigned counsel had been appointed to pursue Applicant’s 11.07 writ. At 

the evidentiary hearing, and over State’s objection, the trial court heard 

matters, and took same under advisement. 

(g) Because Applicant had been bench-warranted to El Paso County, he had not 

WR-83,446-01

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 7/24/2015 8:51:29 AM

Accepted 7/24/2015 9:07:36 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK

 RECEIVED COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 7/24/2015 ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK 
yet received notice that the Court of Criminal Appeals had denied relief.

(h) Applicant and the trial court await ruling upon the instant motion in order to 

determine further action.

(i) Applicant moves that the Honorable Court of Criminal Appeals reconsider its 

decision denying relief, withdraw the order denying relief and wait until such 

time as the trial court submits its proposed findings and until such time as the 

court reporter sends a copy of the reporter’s record to the District Clerk for 

transmittal to the Court of Criminal Appeals.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, Applicant prays that the Honorable Court of Criminal Appeals 

reconsider its denial of relief until the trial court submits its proposed findings and until 

the reporter’s record is sent to the Court of Criminal Appeals for review; and then render

a decision based upon these new matters now brought before the Honorable Court. 

Applicant thanks the Honorable Court.

Respectfully submitted, 

 /S/ Matthew DeKoatz 

Matthew DeKoatz, Attorney at Law

P.O. Box 1886 

El Paso, Texas 79950

 (915) 626-8833

 (915) 541-8892

State bar ID: 05722300
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE

I, MATTHEW DEKOATZ, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

instrument, on this day, July 24, 2015, has been delivered via electronic mail to Mr. Tom 

Darnold, Esquire (Chief of the Appellate Division) of the office of the El Paso County 

District Attorney, 500 East San Antonio, 2nd floor, El Paso, Texas, 79901.

 /S/ Matthew DeKoatz 

MATTHEW DEKOATZ
@conference{1061,
  author = {Moneer Helu and Thomas Hedberg},
  title = {Enabling Smart Manufacturing Research and Development using a Product Lifecycle Test Bed},
  year = {2015},
  month = {2015-06-08},
  publisher = {43rd SME North American Manufacturing Research Conference (NAMRC43), Charlotte, NC},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=917586},
  language = {en},
}