alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Railroad Retirement Board Phone: (312) 751-4992

844 North Rush Street TTY: (312) 751-4701

Chicago Illinois, 60611-1275 Web: https://www.rrb.gov/

United States Railroad Retirement Board 

Worksheet for Computing Excess Railroad Retirement Taxes Withheld in 2022

If you worked for two or more employers in 2022, and your total earnings exceeded $109,200, too much tax may have 

been withheld. This worksheet was developed to help you determine and claim credit for the excess taxes being collected. 

If more than the maximum tax was withheld by a single employer, you must contact your employer for a refund. There is a 

new procedure that must be followed to claim excess tax credits from the IRS.

To claim credit for excess Tier I taxes being collected, you must use your 2022 Form 1040 income tax return. To claim 

credit for excess Tier II taxes, being collected, you must submit IRS Form 843. 

1. Add all social security and Tier I RRTA tax shown on Forms W-2 from all employers

(not counting more than $9,114.00 for each employer.) Enter the sum in area 1c.

1a. Amount of Tier I tax

withheld by Employer #1 + 1b. Amount of Tier I taxwithheld by Employer #2 = 1c. Total amount of Tier 

I tax withheld

2. Show Tier I RRTA tax on any unreported tips on Line 5 of IRS

Form 1040 Schedule 2. Also include any uncollected Tier I tax on

group-term life insurance. Uncollected tax (UT) is shown in Item 12

of IRS Form W-2.

2. Total Tier I tax

uncollected

3. Add the amounts shown in areas 1c and 2. Enter the sum in 3. (If

the amount is $9,114.00 or less, enter “0" in box 5 and go to line 6.)

3. Total of 1c and 2

4. Employee 2022 RRTA Tier I tax limit. 4. $9,114.00

5. Subtract line 4 from line 3. Enter the remainder, which is your excess Tier I tax. This is the amount

of tax credit which should be entered on Line 23 of IRS Form 1040.

5.

6. Add Tier II RRTA tax from Forms W-2 from all employers (not counting more than $5,350.80 for

each employer.) Enter the sum in area 6c.

6a. Amount of Tier II tax

withheld by Employer #1 + 6b. Amount of Tier II taxwithheld by Employer #2 = 6c. Total amount of Tier 

II tax withheld 

7. Show Tier II RRTA tax on any unreported tips on Line 5 of IRS

Form 1040 Schedule 2. Also include any uncollected Tier II tax on

group-term life insurance. Uncollected tax (UT) is shown in Item 12

of IRS Form W-2.

7. Total Tier II tax

uncollected

8. Add the amounts in 6c and 7. Enter the sum in 8. If the amount is

$5,350.80 or less, no excess tax has been withheld.

8. Sum of 6c and 7

9. Employee 2022 RRTA Tier 2 tax limit. 9. $5,350.80 

10. Subtract line 9 from line 8. Enter the remainder, which is your excess Tier II tax. This is the amount

of tax credit which should be entered in item 2 of IRS Form 843.

10.

For updated worksheets, call the Railroad Retirement Board’s Quality Reporting Service Center at (312) 751-4992.

For more information, see IRS publication 505

(Rev. 01/2023)
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in post-effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-7053 on Form S-8, inRegistration Statement Nos. 33-44700, 333-44024 and 333-46218 on Form S-8 of our report dated December 15, 2005, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Archon Corporation for the year ended September 30, 2005. 

 

Las Vegas, NV 

January 6, 2006 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young, LLP
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DANH JOHN TAI DANG,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00172-CR

Appeal from the

413th Judicial District Court 

of Johnson County, Texas1

(TC# DC-F201900089)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Danh John Tai Dang has filed a motion to withdraw his notice of appeal and to 

voluntarily dismiss this appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.2 (governing voluntary dismissals in 

criminal cases). The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

December 22, 2021

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

1 We hear this case on transfer from the Tenth Court of Appeals. See TEX.R.APP.P. 41.3.
Exhibit 4.17


                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                               IM CAPITAL TRUST I

         THIS Certificate of Trust of IM Capital Trust I (the "Trust"), dated as
of December 10, 2001,  is being duly executed and filed by the  undersigned,  as
trustees,  to form a business  trust under the Delaware  Business  Trust Act (12
Del. C.ss.3801 et seq.) (the "Act").


         1. Name.  The name of the business  trust formed  hereby is "IM Capital
Trust I".

         2. Delaware  Trustee.  The name and business  address of the trustee of
the Trust in the State of Delaware  are The Bank of New York  (Delaware),  White
Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware 19711.

         3. Effective  Date.  This  Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon
filing.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned,  being the trustees of the Trust,
have duly executed this  Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)
of the Act.

                             THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE), not in
                             its individual capacity but solely as
                             trustee of the Trust

                             By:    /s/ William T. Lewis
                             Name:  William T. Lewis
                             Title: Senior Vice President

                             THE BANK OF NEW YORK, not in its individual
                             capacity but solely as trustee of the Trust

                             By:    /s/ Kisha A. Holder
                             Name:  Kisha A. Holder
                             Title: Assistant Treasurer


                             /s/ John P. Lawrence
                             JOHN P. LAWRENCE, not in his individual capacity
                             but solely as trustee of the Trust
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: S.A.S., JR.

PETITION OF: S.S., SR., NATURAL

FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 259 WAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

# FILED DA 20-0487

IN RE THE ADOPTION OF: 

## OCT 20 2020

Bowen Greenwood Cleric of Supreme Courl State nr J.H., ORDER A Minor Child.

The Appellate Defender Division (ADD),on behalfofAppellant Father K.P.H.,has petitioned for leave to file an out-of-time appeal on Father's behalf in the above-titled matter, pursuant to M.R. App. P. 4(6). ADD states that Father was involved in a private adoption action seeking termination ofhis parental rights. An evidentiary hearing was held
on August 19, 2020. On August 25, 2020, a document entitled, "Petitioner's Proposed Findings ofFact, Conclusions ofLaw and Order" was filed. In its heading,this document contained the name and contact information for petitioner's attorney who prepared and submitted the document to the court for consideration. Oddly,thisproposed documentwas signed and dated by District Court Judge Marks. On September 16,2020 the District Court issued a Decree ofAdoption—containing Judge Marks' name and contact information in the heading. In the Decree ofAdoption, the prior "proposed findings" were referenced as an actual court order,not merely a proposed document,terminating Father's parental rights. Upon receipt of the Decree of Adoption, Father's trial counsel contacted ADD to attempt to preserve Father's right to appeal. ADD advises Petitioner's counsel was contacted but did not respond as to Petitioner's position on the out-of-time appeal request. We grant out-of-time appeals under M.R.App.P.4(6)in the "infrequent harsh case and under extraordinary circumstances amounting to a gross miscarriage ofjustice." ADD argues that such would occur here if Father were denied his right to appeal when it was unclear the district court had issued a termination order entitled "Proposed Findings
. . ." We agree. 10/20/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0487Under the facts ofthis case, the untimeliness ofK.P.H.'s appeal is through no fault

ofhis own. Further,there was confusion on the part ofFather's trial counsel in that counsel thought the document entitled "Petitioner's Proposed Findings ofFact,Conclusions ofLaw and Order"was merely a document proposed by petitioner, not an actual order terminating Father's parental rights. Given the importance ofthe interests at stake for Father, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for leave to file an out-of-time appeal is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that ADD shall promptly order the necessary transcripts for the appeal. The Clerk ofthis Court is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record. 1" 1 -, DATED this day ofOctober, 2020.

ChiefJustice

di h d (.,,.. S lia.-4s Justices
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Dollarama Group L.P. and Dollarama Group Holdings L.P. (together, the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 3, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Larry Rossy, Chief Executive Officer of the general partner of the Company, Dollarama Group GP Inc., certify that to my knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, as amended; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date: June 12, 2009



/s/ Larry RossyLarry Rossy Chief Executive Officer and Director