alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory Miles, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 548]

*447Testimony that defendant was arrested while in possession of six ski caps and five scarves, all with tags still on them, did not constitute uncharged crimes evidence (see *People v Fleming,*30 AD3d 266 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 788 [2006]; *People v Brown,*277 AD2d 974 [2000], *lv denied*96 NY2d 756 [2001]; *People v Flores,*210 AD2d 1 [1994], *lv denied*84 NY2d 1031 [1995]). There was no evidence that the items were stolen, or used or intended to be used for purposes of disguise, and the court specifically directed the prosecution not to suggest that possession of the hats and scarves involved criminal activity; defendant’s speculation that a jury might nevertheless draw such inferences is insufficient to bring this evidence into the realm of uncharged crimes. The evidence was sufficiently relevant to be admissible *(see generally People v Scarola,*71 NY2d 769, 777 [1988]), in that it tended to explain why defendant no longer possessed the proceeds of the robbery at the time of his arrest. The People’s only summation argument concerning this evidence was that defendant may have quickly spent the robbery proceeds on this merchandise. Whether or not this was a likely explanation did not go to the admissibility of the evidence, but to the weight to be accorded it by the trier of fact.

Upon his arrest, defendant asked the arresting officer if he was being charged with “160.10.” Defendant concedes that the People were entitled to elicit evidence that Penal Law § 160.10 refers to second-degree robbery, but argues that since the People failed to do so, it was improper for the court to fill in that gap. We reject that argument, and conclude that the court properly declined to redact references to section 160.10 in the verdict sheet and its reading of the indictment. Although, in the context of the case, the fact that 160.10 refers to second-degree robbery tended to explain why defendant’s statement evinced consciousness of guilt, this was still legal information that the court was authorized to give the jury *(see*CPL 300.10, 310.20 [2]; *see also*
      *448Prince, Richardson on Evidence § 2-301 [Farrell 11th ed] [law of forum subject to judicial notice and need not be offered in evidence]). Moreover, by the time of defendant’s application, the information defendant sought to redact had already been provided to the jury without objection in the court’s preliminary instructions and in the prosecutor’s opening statement and summation. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 8 -00 073 -CV
The Gaylord Skin ner Trust, G aylord Sk inn er and Ricki Don Sk inn er , Appellan ts
v. Nathan Minchey and Gr etc hen E. Min chey , Appellees

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- GN-04- 0035 74 , HO NORAB LE STEP HEN Y ELENOSK Y , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N
On Fe bruar

y 1, 2008, appellants The Gaylord Skinn er Trust, Gay lord Skinner and Ricki Don Skinner filed their notice of appe al and a m o t i on to ext end time to file their notice of appea l. On Fe bruar

y 8, 2008, appellee s Nathan Minchey and Gretche n E. Minchey filed a motion to dismi ss for wa

nt of jurisdiction. The Minchey s contend that the Skinners failed to f ile their notice of appe al and their motion for extension of time w ithin the time prescr ibed under rule 26 of the rules of appe llate proc edure
. See Tex. R. App. P . 26.

I f any party timely files a motion for ne w trial, the notice of appe al m u s t b e filed wi thi n 9 0 d ay s a ft e r the tr ia l court ’s jud g me nt is s ig ne d. Te x. R. A pp . P. 26 .1 (a )( 1) . T he a

pp e llate court may extend the time to file the notice of appea l if , within 15 day s afte r the deadline for f iling the no tic e of

app eal , th e pa

rt y fi le s in the tr ia l c ourt

the no tic e of

a pp e a l and fi le s in the a pp e llate court a motion to ex tend time comply ing w ith Rul e 10.5(b) . Tex. R. App. P . 26.3.The Skinners have also filed a motion to ex tend time to file the cle rk’s re cord. In light of 1 our d ism iss a l of

thi s a pp e a l, w e dis mis s th is m oti on a s mo ot. 2 Th e dis tr ic t c ourt ’s jud g me nt wa s sig ne d o n O c tob e r 1 5, 20 07 . T he Ski nn e rs tim e ly filed a motion for ne w trial on Nove mber 14, 2007. The ref ore, the Skinners’ not ice of appea l was due on January

14, 2008. See Tex. R. App. P
. 4.1(a) , 26.1(a) (1). The Skinners’ motion to extend time to file their notice of appea l was due on January 29, 2008. See Tex. R. App. P . 26.3. “[O]nce the per iod for g ranting a motion for extension of time under R u le [26.3] h a s p a s s e d , a p arty c an n o lo n g e r inv o k e th e a p p e ll a te c o u rt’ s ju

r is d ic ti o n . ” V

er b u r g t v. Dorner , 959 S.W .2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). The S kinners did not file t heir noti ce of appea l and motion for extension of tim e until after J anuar y 29, 2008. There fore , they failed to invoke our

jurisdiction. Acc ording ly , we ove rrule the Skinners’ motion for extension of tim e, g rant the Minche y s’ motion to dismi ss, and dismiss t his appea l for wa nt of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(a)
. 1

____________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Pembe rton and Waldrop Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Mar ch 4, 2008
|   | • | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | • | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|--------|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date: May 9, 2011 | /s/ JOHN B. WALKER                            |   |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | John B. Walker                                |   |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer of EV Management LLC, |   |
|                    | general partner of EV Energy GP, L.P.,        |   |
|                    | general partner of EV Energy Partners, L.P.   |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part I, Item 8. of this Form 10-K and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1995
<CASH>                                          86,235
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  143,709
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,607
<INVENTORY>                                  3,248,136
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,498,443
<PP&E>                                         633,816
<DEPRECIATION>                                 389,148
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,749,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          331,262
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       118,823
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,228,940
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,749,342
<SALES>                                      1,125,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,233,862
<CGS>                                          906,840
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,943,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,166
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (709,235)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (8,201)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (701,034)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (701,034)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
Order entered July 23, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00856-CV

IN RE SONIA ALVAREZ, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-07-16957

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Bridges and Justice Stoddart

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus. 

Although we have considered relator’s petition and the attached appendix in concluding that 

mandamus relief is not warranted, because relator’s supporting appendix is not properly redacted 

in accordance with the rules of appellate procedure, we STRIKE relator’s petition and 

supporting appendix. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(k). We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this 

original proceeding. We DIRECT the clerk to provide a copy of this order to all parties and to 

Tanner Joy Feast, official court reporter of the 254th Judicial District Court. Because we have 

disposed of relator’s petition, the court reporter’s contest of relator’s affidavit of indigence is 

moot and it is not necessary for the relator to file a reporter’s record in this case.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
#### Hill *v.*State.

(Division B.

March 3, 1930.)

[126 So. 470.

No. 28210.]

*667B. H. Loving, of West. Point, for appellant.

*668Forrest B. Jackson, Assistant Attorney-General, for appellee.

Ethridge, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

George Hill was indicted for an assault upon the body of Q. T). Vail. The pertinent part of the indictment *669reads: “Upon their oaths present that George Hill in said county, on the 1st day of July, A. D. 1929, did willfully and unlawfully upon the body of Q. D. Vail make an assault with his hands and did then and there with his said hands did then and there unlawfully grab, seize, choke and shove the said Q. D. Vail contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the state of Mississippi. ’ ’

There was a demurrer to this indictment based upon the grounds that it charged no crime known to the law; and that it did not inform the defendant of the nature and cause of the accusation against him; and that the alleged assault as set out in the indictment is a mere conclusion of the pleader and not supported by specific allegations therein as to the facts; and that it is not alleged that there was an intention on the part of the defendant to do bodily harm or injury to Q. IX Vail; and that it is not alleged that defendant laid hands on and grabbed and choked Q. I). Vail with intent to do the said Q. IX Vail bodily harm or injury, and such intent is the gist of the offense.

It appears from the proof that Vail was a justice of the peace, and had on the day of the alleged assault held a term of court in which one Eugene Cousins was tried for possession of liquor. The defendant‘in the case had called for a jury, and the jurv had found him guilty. After this conviction, one Ben Bennett walked up to the justice and said, “Captain, it looks like you convict them from-jugs and bottles.” The justice of the peace said, “You don’t think a jury of six good and lawful men would return the wrong’verdict,do you?” He said, “Yes, T do. ” The justice then threatened Bennett with violence, whereupon Hill, the appellant in this case, walked up and grabbed the justice of the peace in the collar and said, “No you won’t, I will take your -case; you won’t jump-on any man in town.”

*670This constitutes the gist of the appeal here; it being insisted. that the indictment was invalid and also that the evidence above stated did not constitute an assault. We think the indictment was proper, and that the evidence was sufficient to sustain it. See Hussey v. State, 144 Miss. 380, 109 So. 871; Stroud v. State, 131 Miss. 875, 95 So. 738; Crawford v. State, 146 Miss. 540, 112 So. 681.

Judgment of the court below will therefore be affirmed.

Affirmed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JACQUES BILL JOSEPH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-2488

[December 20, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Samantha Schosberg-Feuer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-

2016-CF-009101-AXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Nancy Jack, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. 

Carney, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# table66_q9.1_size
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT

Section 1350 Certification as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Globalink, LTD. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: December 2, 2014

             

By: /s/ Hin Kwok Sheung 

                                           

 Hin Kwok Sheung 

Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT

Section 1350 Certification as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Globalink, LTD. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: December 2, 2014

             

By: /s/Ben Choi

                                           

Ben Choi

Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1609]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

*Whereas*, the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Act provides for “ the establishment of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for other purposes,” and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of entry;                

*Whereas*, the City and County of Butte-Silver Bow (the Grantee) has made application to the Board (FTZ Docket 43-2008, filed 8/4/08), requesting the establishment of a foreign-trade zone at a site in Butte, Montana, adjacent to the Butte-Silver Bow Customs and Border Protection port of entry;                

*Whereas*, notice inviting public comment has been given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (73 FR 46870, 8/12/08), and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                 

*Whereas*, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the application is in the public interest;                

*Now, therefore*, the Board hereby grants to the Grantee the privilege of establishing a foreign-trade zone, designated on the records of the Board as Foreign-Trade Zone No. 274, at the site described in the application, and subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.                 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of June 2009.

FOREIGN-TRADE ZONES BOARD,Gary Locke, Secretary of Commerce, Chairman and Executive Officer.

Attest:

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary

[FR Doc. E9-15331 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SGS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the
Report), the undersigned each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |  |  |                                                
|------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------
|May 15, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ HENRY R. BAUGHMAN                          
|             |  |  |  | Henry R. Baughman                              
|             |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
|             |  | 
|May 15, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ JAMES M. DAHMUS                            
|             |  |  |  | James M. Dahmus                                
|             |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
No. 04-1 l-OOHBr CR

\f.

Hf

Si/vet

WAW

;s

A?Pe,

14

t. "OTTLE.CLESK

35

3S
*fe 4WV

D.

54-4

it

(\L56

4>

£,44. 3s ;s

cSUid
f"\ \| \S \Jnckc\hy^ tt

Copy O^ TiFfAKiY Mxcole BaRKJ&TJ.

3-433 oa MchUr ao.....3L..ooc?

Cocflre

4- l)e. /ec4/Ve.

C£
BEXAR COUNTY

DONNA KAY McKINNEY

DISTRICT CLERK

CHARLTON BRADSHAW February 18,2015

RE:2009CR12809A

Dear Mr. Bradshaw,

Our office cannot supply you with the documents you are inquiring about. Please contact the

court your case was processed in or the arresting agency.

If you do not know specifically which documents are on file or which documents you

need copies of you can request computer printout showing what is on file. This must

also be paid for in advance. The charge for it is 1.00 per page. The cost for your

printout will be $.

If you do not know the number of pages you can write to us and we will let you know the

number of pages.

The copies you requested will cost: (copies of the event log)

It will cost five dollars ($5.00) for us to conduct Bexar County District Court records to

determine the case number.

If you are in need of copies of the COURT REPORTER'S RECORD /STATEMENT OF

FACTS CONTACT:

Other: Check not acceptable.

We do not accept personal checks. You must pay with cashiers check or money order

Payable to the BEXAR COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK.

Sincerely.

DONNA KAY McKINNEY

BEXAR COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK

BY:

DEPUTY DISTRICT CLERK

PAUL CLIZONDO TOWER * 101 W. NUEVA SUITE 2! 7 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205-3002 (210) 335-2591

www.co.beNar.tx.us/dclerk
BEXAR COUNTY

DONNA KAY McKinney

DISTRICT CLERK

07/13/2015

CIIARLTONBRADSHAW #1703357

CLEMENTS UNIT

9601 SPUR 591

AMARILLO.TX 79107

RE: Your enclosed correspondence

Dear MR. BRADSHAW,

The District Clerk's office have reeeived your recent correspondence and we arc reluming il for

your convenience.

The exhibit that you are requesting is not available. We do apologize lor any inconvenience that

this may have caused.

Sincerely,

DONNA KAY McKinney

BEKM, COUNTY DISTRICT* RK

Romelta Esquivet

DEPUTY DISTRICT CLERK

BY*

PAUL ELIZONDO TOWER 101 W. NUEVA SUITE 217 SAN ANTONIO. TX 78205-3002 (2i0) 335-2591

www.co.bexar.tx.us/dclerk
@conference{1207091,
  author = {Rick Candell and Karl Montgomery and Mohamed Hany and Susruth Sudhakaran and Dave Cavalcanti},
  title = {Scheduling for Time-critical Applications Utilizing TCP in Software-based 802.1Qbv Wireless TSN},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-04-28 04:04:00},
  publisher = {19th IEEE International Conference on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS 2023), Pavia, IT},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936526},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1109/WFCS57264.2023.10144232},
  language = {en},
}