alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE ANNUAL REPORT ONF FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,918
<SECURITIES>                                   119,161
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,475
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 159,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,910
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,644
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   159,554
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,465
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,794
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   378
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,293
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,293
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,293
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Chadbourne *v.*German-American Ins. Co.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

July 28, 1887.)

Costs—Taxation—Removal of Cause—Costs in State Court.

After tiie removal of a clause into the federal court a party cannot, on recovering judgment, be allowed the costs proscribed by the state statutes up to the time of removal, unless such items are taxable under sections 823, 824, Rev. St.

*Roger Foster*and *Samuel Blythe, Rogers,*for plaintiff.

1 *Vm. D. Murray*and *Luke A. Lockwood,*for defendant.

Lacombe, J.

This case was removed from the state court after service of notice of trial. Plaintiff has prevailed, and presents his bill of costs. Upon taxation, bo claimed to be entitled to the costs prescribed by the state statutes up to the time of removal. The clerk disallowed these items, and plaintiff seeks to review his action, relying on the report of an anonymous case in 13 Abb. N. C. 54. It is therein stated that in that case Judge Wallace ordered that “the defendant recover the state court costs up to the time of removal, and the statutory costs in the United States court subsequent to the removal.”

I have communicated with Judge Wallace, and learn from him that the report given of this case is inaccurate. The order signed by him was one, the form of which was agreed to by both parties, and no decision such as is above indicated was made by him. The rule laid down in this circuit in *Clare*v. *National City Bank,*14 Blatchf. 445, has been in no way qualified and is still in force here. The clerk’s taxation is-affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

JEFFREY M. MULLER; et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

THE HON. PHILIP J. MAENZA, et al., 

 Defendants. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

: 

:

: 

:

No. 2:10-CV-6110 (WHW) (CCC) 

SUPPLEMENTAL 

DECLARATION OF 

MIKO TEMPSKI

I, Mikolaj T. Tempski, declare as follows: 

1. I am General Counsel for Plaintiff Second Amendment Foundation, Inc. (“SAF”) 

2. The right to keep and bear arms is germane to the purposes of SAF, which (as 

previously expressed) include promoting both the exercise of the right to keep and bear arms and 

education, research, publishing, and legal action focusing on the constitutional right to privately 

own and possess firearms. SAF promotes research and education on the consequences of 

abridging the right to keep and bear arms and on the historical grounding and importance of the 

right to keep and bear arms as one of the core civil rights of United States citizens. 

3. SAF sponsored and was a party to the litigation in McDonald v. Chicago, and 

SAF submitted an amicus brief supporting the plaintiffs in District of Columbia v. Heller. Over 

the years, SAF has sponsored and prosecuted many other lawsuits concerning the right to keep 

and bear arms. 

4. SAF has over 8,000 members and supporters in the State of New Jersey. 

5. Members and supporters of SAF regularly contact SAF with concerns regarding 

New Jersey’s gun laws including, specifically, New Jersey’s laws regarding the carry of guns. 

Case 2:10-cv-06110-WHW-MCA Document 29-1 Filed 02/18/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 301
Case 2:10-cv-06110-WHW-MCA Document 29-1 Filed 02/18/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 302
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                    CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Nu-kote Holding, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13093, File No. 33-60326,
File No. 33-69708 and File No. 33-97376) of our reports dated July 31, 1997 on
our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of Nu-kote Holding, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 1997 and
1996, and for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 1997, which
reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
                                          Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
 
Dallas, Texas
July 31, 1997
#### Kelly and others *v.*Hedden, Collector, etc.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

July 23, 1887.)

1. Custom Duties—Treaties—Exemptions—Dominican Republic—Hawaiian Islands.

Tho treaty with the king of the Hawaiian Islands, and the act of congress giving it effect, (19 II. 8. St. at Large, 200,) by which molasses from those islands was admitted into the United States free of duty, did not operate upon the previous treaty with the Dominican Republic, so as to establish a like exemption as to molasses imported from the latter country; following *Bartram*v. *Robertson,*15 Fed. Rep. 212, affirmed 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1115; *Whitney v. Robertson,*21 Fed. Rep. 566; *Netherclift*v. *Robertson,*27 Fed. Rep. 737.

2. Same—Act op Congress op 1883.

The eleventh section of the tariff act of 1883, referring to the sanctity of treaty obligations, notwithstanding that act, was not intended to revive and set in motion the inert features of the Dominican treaty; following *Netherclift*v. *Robertson, supra.*

On Demurrer to Complaint.

*Charles Stewart*Davison, for plaintiffs.

*Stephen A. Walker,*U. S. Atty., and *Thomas Greenwood,*Asst. U. S. Atty., for defendant.

Lacombe, J.

The questions raised by the demurrer are the same considered in tho eases of *Bartram*v. *Robertson,*15 Fed. Rep. 212, (recently affirmed in the supreme court, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1115;) *Whitney*v. *Robertson,*21 Fed. Rep. 566, and *Netherclift*v. *Robertson,*27 Fed. Rep. 737; and, for the reasons stated in the opinions there delivered, the demurrer is sustained.

Judgment is ordered for the defendant.
Case 2:10-cr-00854-MCA Document 27 Filed 01/20/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 41
Case 2:10-cr-00854-MCA Document 27 Filed 01/20/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 42
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

    SUBSIDIARIES OF ABINGTON BANCORP, INC. Abington Bancorp, Inc. has two
subsidiaries. Abington Savings Bank (the "Bank"), is a wholly owned subsidiary
which is a Massachusetts-chartered savings bank. Abington Bancorp Capital Trust
is a Delaware business trust whose sole purpose is to issue capital securities.
The Bank has seven wholly-owned subsidiaries, Holt Park Place Development
Corporation, Norroway Pond Development Corporation, Old Colony Mortgage
Corporation, Mass Securities Corporation, Mass SEC Corp. II which are
Massachusetts Corporations, and Abington Securities Corporation and 70 Quincy
Ave., LLC, which are Delaware Corporations.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

JJ JOHN WHIPKEY,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 93 WAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Case 1:10-cv-06791-JBS-AMD Document 4 Filed 12/31/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 51
Case 1:10-cv-06791-JBS-AMD Document 4 Filed 12/31/10 Page 2 of 11 PageID: 52
Case 1:10-cv-06791-JBS-AMD Document 4 Filed 12/31/10 Page 3 of 11 PageID: 53
Case 1:10-cv-06791-JBS-AMD Document 4 Filed 12/31/10 Page 4 of 11 PageID: 54
Case 1:10-cv-06791-JBS-AMD Document 4 Filed 12/31/10 Page 5 of 11 PageID: 55
Case 1:10-cv-06791-JBS-AMD Document 4 Filed 12/31/10 Page 6 of 11 PageID: 56
Case 1:10-cv-06791-JBS-AMD Document 4 Filed 12/31/10 Page 7 of 11 PageID: 57
Case 1:10-cv-06791-JBS-AMD Document 4 Filed 12/31/10 Page 8 of 11 PageID: 58
Case 1:10-cv-06791-JBS-AMD Document 4 Filed 12/31/10 Page 9 of 11 PageID: 59
Case 1:10-cv-06791-JBS-AMD Document 4 Filed 12/31/10 Page 10 of 11 PageID: 60
Case 1:10-cv-06791-JBS-AMD Document 4 Filed 12/31/10 Page 11 of 11 PageID: 61
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tetragenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), Martin Schacker, as Co-Chief Executive Officer hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                              
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



| | /s/
    Martin Schacker                                   
| | ----------------------------------------------------------
| | Martin SchackerCo-Chief Executive OfficerNovember 14, 2008



---
#### In the Matter of Damian Richard A., Jr., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Damian A., Sr., Appellant; Concord Family Services, Inc., Respondent.

[856 NYS2d 43]

*459Respondent failed to show either a reasonable excuse for his failure to appear for the fact-finding and dispositional hearings or a meritorious defense to the proceeding. His excuse that he was “out of town” because it was Easter week is insufficient and also does not explain why he failed to contact his attorney, the court, or the agency to advise of his unavailability *(see Matter of Laura Mariela R.,*302 AD2d 300 [2003]; *Matter of Ashley Marie M.,*287 AD2d 333 [2001]). In light of respondent’s chronic failure to appear, the court properly went forward with the proceeding in his absence *(see Matter of Kristen Simone V.,*30 AD3d 174 [2006]). Respondent’s assertion that he visited the child on a regular basis was unsubstantiated. Furthermore, even if we credited his assertion that he began attendance at the required programs in June 2005, approximately four months before the filing of the petition, respondent failed to establish that he complied with the service plan during the statutorily relevant time frame. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Gonzalez, McGuire and Moskowitz, JJ.
**ESCO,
      INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION**




**1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**




**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ESCO, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB
      for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William T. Foley,
      President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/
                William T. FoleyWilliam
                T. FoleyPresident
                and Chief Financial OfficerMay
                15, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      ESCO, Inc. and will be retained by ESCO, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

298 CA 16-01126 PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

RICHARD COOPER AND DEBRA BECKS COOPER, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

V ORDER
BENAKA, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

OSBORN, REED & BURKE, LLP, ROCHESTER (L. DAMIEN COSTANZA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
KELLY WHITE DONOFRIO LLP, ROCHESTER (PAUL D. KELLY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Debra A. Martin, A.J.), entered March 24, 2016. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the motion of plaintiffs for partial summary judgment on liability pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1).
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on February 22, 2017,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: March 24, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 13

- 00198

- CR

BOBBY JOE PEYRONEL , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

Appeal from the 174th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1254877 ).

TO THE 174TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court , on the 21st day of August 2014 , the ca se upon appeal to revise or

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on February 26, 2013. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly r aised by the parties, the Court holds that there was error in that portion of the trial court’s judgment that states that appellant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child under six years of age . Accordingly, the Court modifies the referenced portion of the trial court’s judgment to reflect that appellant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a person under

14

.

T he Court also holds that there was reversible error in that portion of the trial court’s judgment concerningpunishment. Ac cordingly, the Court reverses the portion of the trial court’s judgment concerning punishment and

remands the case to the trial court for a new punishment hearing.

The Court further holds that there was no reversible error in the remaining portions of th e trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment as herein modified

.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for observance.

Judgment rendered August 21, 2014.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle. Opinion delivered by Justice Huddle.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order o f our said Court in

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

August 21 , 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
#### The State, Peter S. Garrabrant, prosecutor, *vs.*Ambrose Meyers et al.

1. A return of the surveyors of the highways laying out a road will not be set aside upon the ground that the appointment of one of the surveyors by the township committee was not made under their hands and seals.

2. A person so appointed is a surveyor *defacto,*and his acts, as regards the public and third persons, are valid.

*Certiorari*in matter of road.

Brown, J.

The *certiorari*in this case brings up the return of surveyors laying out a road in the county of Essex. The plaintiff seeks to set aside the return, on the ground that one of the surveyors was not legally appointed. It appears, by the state of the case, that James Brown was elected one of the surveyors for the township of Belleville on the 8th April, 1861, and had failed to take the oath of office on the 2d May following. The surveyor not having taken the oath, and returned the certificate to the clerk of the township within six days, it was a refusal to serve. *Nix.*877, § 21. No election appears to have been made of a surveyor to supply the vacancy by a town meeting called for that purpose, as provided for by law. *Nix.*876, § 13. This gave the power to the town committee to appoint, and they did appoint, by resolution, Thomas Vreeland.

If this appointment had been made under the hands and seals of the committee it would have been regular. That it was uot so done, is the reason assigned for reversing the proceedings. Vreeland was qualified, and entered upon the duties of his office. It was held by this court, in *Hoagland*v. *Culmet, Spencer’s R.*387, that when a surveyor held by color of title, and was *de facto*a surveyor, his acts, so far as they concern the public and third persons who have an interest in the thing done, are valid.

Proceedings affirmed.
# table160_q16.3_naics
H. Res. 995 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 8, 2020. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, ranked as follows on the following standing committee of the House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM: Mr. Mfume 

(to rank immediately after Mr. Khanna). 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - March 2006 

Benefit payments March 2006 March 2005 

Regular Retirement 

and Survivor Benefits 

Total 

Retired employ

Spouses and d

Widow(er)s - a

Other survivors 

ees 

ivorced spouses 

ged and disabled 

$786,970,000 

513,325,000 

93,991,000 

156,679,000 

22,970,000 

$765,520,000 

495,635,000 

90,993,000 

156,440,000 

22,452,000 

Average under 

Being paid Awarded in Social Security 

Monthly benefits end of month month March 2006 

Number Average1 Number Average1 Being Paid Awarded 

Total 590,200 ......... 2,400 ......... ......... .........

Regular employee annuities, total 281,100 $1,807 1,000 $2,296 ......... .........

 Age 197,200 1,767 2 300 2 2,848 $1,005 3 $1,334

 Disability, Full Retirement Age and Over 34,500 1,612 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Disability, Under Full Retirement Age 49,400 2,106 400 2,323 942 991 

Spouses and divorced spouses 139,700 664 700 743 485 355 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 142,000 1,100 600 1,482 952 792 

Widowed mothers and fathers 900 1,395 4/ 1,286 718 729 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 14,600 736 100 737 5/ 5/ 

Children 11,700 826 4/ 1,089 659 667 

Other survivors 4/ 802 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Benefit payments 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

March 

2006 

$5,104,000 

March 

2005 

$5,256,000 

Number 

122,200 

Average 

$42 

Number 

400 

Average 

$41 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement. 

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 35); about 300

 other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis. 

4

Fewer than 50. 

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers. 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. 

Regular retirement and survivor benefit payments total includes hospital insurance benefits for services in Canada. 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

March 2006 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Average payment 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period

 Per

 full week 

Unemployment 3,300 $495 $277 

Sickness 6,000 489 

March 2006 

Benefit payments 

278 

March 2005 

Unemployment

Total 

3,645,000 

$7,061,000 $6,803,000

3,281,000 

Sickness 3,415,000 3,522,000 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited). Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.

 Recycled

 Paper 

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 123 (Monday, June 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15300]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,870]


Samuel Aaron International, Long Island City, NY; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 30, 2009 in response to a petition 
filed on behalf of workers of Samuel Aaron International, Long Island 
City, New York.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of May 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-15300 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
^•/vo. p^.ovajPir RECEIVED IN . yj' ov^-ii. COURT OF P.RMWAl APPEALS

^r^N-oow*^ JUL 07 2015

u FILED IN Ab@IAeesta,G!§rk

JUL 27 2015

*7
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers of Cleartronic, Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to said officers' knowledge, that the  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended December 31, 2017 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 4, 2018

|   |  |                        
|-- |  | -----------------------
|   |  |                        
|   |  | /s/ Michael M. Moore   
|By |  | Michael M. Moore       
|   |  | Chief Executive Officer



|   |  |                        
|-- |  | -----------------------
|   |  | /s/ Larry M. Reid      
|By |  | Larry M. Reid          
|   |  | Chief Financial Officer