alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jeffrey R. Mason, Principal Accounting Officer of Quartz
Mountain Resources Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i)          
the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended July 31,
2006 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)          the
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:  | January 26, 2007             | 
|------ | ---------------------------- | 
|       |                              | 
|       | /s/
      Jeffrey Mason      | 
|       |                              | 
|By:    | Jeffrey R. Mason             | 
|Title: | Principal Accounting Officer | 



This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1381

JANECE P. MICKENS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

INTELLIGENT DECISIONS, INC.; ZAMAN KHAN; THERESA POND; SUSAN 

MAYER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District 

Judge. (1:14-cv-01486-AJT-TCB)

Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: July 27, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Janece P. Mickens, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Nicholas Petkovich, 

Amanda Vaccaro, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Janece Mickens appeals the district court’s order accepting 

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil 

complaint for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we grant Mickens leave to proceed in forma pauperis 

and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mickens 

v. Intelligent Decisions, Inc., No. 1:14-cv-01486-AJT-TCB (E.D. 

Va. Mar. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Sean O. Casey, M.D., certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Virtual Radiologic Corporation;

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.              The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

(a)         Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.              The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)         All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
|   | Date:  May 2,  2008 | By:    | /s/ Sean O. Casey, M.D. |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |                          |   | Sean O. Casey, M.D.     |
|   |                          |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

----
[J-3-2015] [MO:Baer, J.] 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

PHILADELPHIA FIREFIGHTERS' UNION, 

LOCAL 22, INTERNATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS, 

AFL-CIO BY ITS GUARDIAN AD LITEM 

WILLIAM GAULT, PRESIDENT, TIM 

MCSHEA, VICE PRESIDENT, KELVIN 

FONG, VICE PRESIDENT, AND FIRE 

LIEUTENANT ANDREW THOMAS, 

 Appellants 

 v. 

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MAYOR 

MICHAEL A. NUTTER, RICHARD 

NEGRIN, LLOYD AYERS, 

 Appellees 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 16 EAP 2014 

Appeal from the order of Commonwealth 

Court entered on 09/18/2013 at No. 869 

C.D. 2013 reversing the order entered on 

05/14/2013, in the Court of Common Pleas, 

Civil Division, Philadelphia County at No. 

1039 May Term 2013. 

ARGUED: March 10, 2015 

CONCURRING OPINION 

MR. JUSTICE STEVENS DECIDED: July 20, 2015 

I write separately to express my concern that the current procedure for promotion 

of civil service employees, provided for by the existing language of Philadelphia’s Home 

Rule Charter and Civil Service Regulations, does not serve to maintain objectivity in the 

promotion process, but instead enables the very manipulation of the process that the civil 

service system was intended to prevent. Re-crafting the Home Rule Charter and the 

Civil Service Regulations to better prevent the potential for such abuse is not the function 

of this Court, however. Instead, we must apply the terms of those documents, as written. 
[J-3-2015] [MO: Baer, J.] - 2 

The Majority Opinion has accomplished this, and I concur in the result reached by 

the Majority, which affirms the order of the Commonwealth Court reversing the Court of 

Common Pleas’ grant of mandamus relief to the Philadelphia Firefighters’ Union.
Order entered July 16, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01579-CV

DAVID BAGWELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE DAVID S. 

BAGWELL TRUST, ET AL, Appellants

V.

BBVA COMPASS AND SAM MEADE, Appellees

On Appeal from the 

Culberson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-00991

ORDER

We GRANT appellant David Bagwell’s July 15, 2015 unopposed motion for extension 

of time to file reply brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than August 21, 2015.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Principal Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 10, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony C.
      Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony
                C. PintsopoulosAnthony
                C. PintsopoulosPrincipal
                Financial OfficerOctober
                21, 2008
#### CROWN KINGDOM EMBASSY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-5110.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 30, 2001.

Before PAULINE NEWMAN, RADER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

The United States moves to summarily affirm the Court of Federal Claims’ judgment dismissing the Crown Kingdom Embassy’s complaint. The Crown Kingdom Embassy has not responded.

A complaint was filed with the Court of Federal Claims seeking $32 trillion in damages and an order compelling the United States to sign a deed for San Clemente Island. The complaint was signed by “His Royal Majesty King Gordon I.” Based on documents attached to the plaintiffs brief, it appears that Gordon Price is the person behind the complaint. The Court of Federal Claims dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction, noting that the plaintiff had incorrectly asserted that jurisdiction need not exist and, in any event, holding that none of the allegations stated a claim within the court’s jurisdiction. In the informal brief, plaintiff raises arguments concerning the failure of the Department of Veterans Affairs to pay for medical treatment.

The United States argues that the Court of Federal Claims’ judgment should be summarily affirmed.* We agree. Summary disposition of a case “is appropriate, *inter alia,*when the position of one party is so clearly correct as a matter of law that no substantial question regarding the outcome of the appeal exists.” *Joshua v. United States,*17 F.3d 378, 380 (Fed.Cir.1994). In the present case, it is clear that summary disposition is warranted. The complaint is not within the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The United States’ motion for summary affirmance is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

*

 The United States notes that this court previously summarily affirmed another judgment of dismissal by the Court of Federal Claims in which plaintiff sought similar relief. *See Crown Kingdom Embassy-Consulate v. United States,*No. 00-5080 (Fed.Cir. Sept. 1, 2000).
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification
      (a)
    
    Designated such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principals;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
   /s/ Jackie L. ReedJackie L. ReedPresident and CEO
ONE PRICE CLOTHING STORES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
No. 33-20529, 33-31623, 33-48091 and 33-61803 on Form S-8 pertaining to the
1987 Stock Option Plan, the 1988 Stock Option Plan, the 1991 Stock Option
Plan and the Director Stock Option Plan, respectively, of One Price Clothing
Stores, Inc. of our report dated March 17, 1999 appearing in Form 10-K of
One Price Clothing Stores, Inc. for the year ended January 30, 1999.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Greenville, South Carolina
April 28, 1999
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ William J. Horan

William J. Horan, Chairman, President and Director(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: November 15, 2010
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the annual report of Driver Passport Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy
      Brown, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company. and will be retained by the
      Company. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.




**DRIVER
                PASSPORT, INC.**Date:
                October 22,
                2007
            By:
            /s/ Randy
              BrownRandy
              BrownChief
                Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
Benefit payments January 2001

Total

Retired employees

Regular Retirement Spouses and divorced spouses

and Survivor Benefits Widow(er)s - aged and disabled

Other survivors

Number Average Number Average

Total 672,400 ......... 2,500 ......... .........

Regular employee annuities, total 305,300 $1,427 900 $1,931 .........

 Age 225,200 1,395 1 300 1 2,298 2 $1,106

 Disability, age 65 and over 38,300 1,282 ......... ......... .........

 Disability, under age 65 41,800 1,737 400 2,059

Spouses and divorced spouses 158,700 546 600 609

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 178,400 853 900 1,027

Widowed mothers and fathers 1,200 1,063 3/ 1,264

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 15,200 598 100 598

Children 13,500 703 100 948

Other survivors 100 594 ......... ......... .........

 Benefit payments

Supplemental January January

Employee 2001 2000 Number Average

Annuities

$5,863,000 $6,235,000 136,100 $42

1

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 34); about 300

 other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

2

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis.

3

Fewer than 50.

4

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers.

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.

Regular retirement and survivor benefit payments total includes hospital insurance benefits for services in Canada.

400 $41 

4/ 4/

552 582

799 742

.........

Being paid

end of month

Awarded 

in month

Number Average

.........

586 608

787 846

417 310

.........

.........

$845

Monthly benefits

Being Paid Awarded

Average under

Being paid

end of month

Awarded in

month

Social Security

January 2001

152,262,000 150,478,000

428,979,000

87,747,000 87,994,000

20,953,000 20,538,000

(Over)

Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - January 2001

January 2000

$701,083,000 $687,989,000

440,119,000
 Unemployment 9,000 $238.05

 Sickness 7,700 238.15 

 Unemployment

 Sickness

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.

 Recycled

 Paper

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board

Bureau of the Actuary and the Office of Public Affairs

Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued)

January 2001

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits

Average payment

 Per

 full week

$399.98

Number of beneficiaries

during month

Per 2-week

registration period

422.61

January 2001

Benefit payments

January 2000

Total $12,275,000 $7,440,000

 7,449,000 3,723,000

 4,826,000 3,716,000
Exhibit 32.2

CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Westway
Group, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |        |  |                                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  |  |        |  | /s/ Thomas A. Masilla, Jr.                           
|                       |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Thomas A. Masilla, Jr.                               
|                       |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|Dated: August 10, 2009 |  |  |  |        |  |
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 10, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony C. PintsopoulosPrincipal Financial OfficerMay 11, 2011
H. Res. 765 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 17, 2019. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R. 

1158) to authorize cyber incident response teams at the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes, with 

the Senate amendment thereto, and to consider in the House, 

without intervention of any point of order, a motion offered 

by the chair of the Committee on Appropriations or her designee that the House concur in the Senate amendment with 

an amendment consisting of the text of Rules Committee 

Print 116–43. The Senate amendment and the motion shall 

be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one 

hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. The 

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to its adoption without intervening motion. 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R. 1865) 

to require the Secretary of the Treasury to mint a coin in 
2 

•HRES 765 EH 

commemoration of the opening of the National Law Enforcement Museum in the District of Columbia, and for other purposes, with the Senate amendment thereto, and to consider 

in the House, without intervention of any point of order, a 

motion offered by the chair of the Committee on Appropriations or her designee that the House concur in the Senate 

amendment with an amendment consisting of the text of 

Rules Committee Print 116–44 modified by the amendment 

printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. The Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair 

and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to its adoption without intervening motion or demand for division of the question. 

SEC. 3. The chair of the Committee on Appropriations 

may insert in the Congressional Record not later than December 17, 2019, such material as she may deem explanatory 

of the Senate amendments and the motions specified in the 

first two sections of this resolution. 
3 

•HRES 765 EH 

SEC. 4. House Resolution 761 is hereby adopted. 

Attest: 

Clerk.