Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 7, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 32073 

Ontario, L4W 5N6, Canada, 1–800–463– 

6727, or go to http://www.shopcsa.ca/

onlinestore/welcome.asp. 

(1) CAN/CSA–C747–94 (‘‘CAN/CSA– 

C747’’) (Reaffirmed 2005), Energy 

Efficiency Test Methods for Single- and 

Three-Phase Small Motors, IBR 

approved for § 431.444. 

(2) [Reserved] 

(c) IEEE. Institute of Electrical and 

Electronics Engineers, Inc., 445 Hoes 

Lane, P.O. Box 1331, Piscataway, NJ 

08855–1331, 1–800–678–IEEE (4333), or 

go to http://www.ieee.org/web/

publications/home/index.html. 

(1) IEEE Std 112TM–2004 (Revision of 

IEEE Std 112–1996) (‘‘IEEE Std 112’’), 

IEEE Standard Test Procedure for 

Polyphase Induction Motors and 

Generators, approved February 9, 2004, 

IBR approved for § 431.444. 

(2) IEEE Std 114–2001TM (Revision of 

IEEE Std 114–1982) (‘‘IEEE Std 114’’), 

IEEE Standard Test Procedure for 

Single-Phase Induction Motors, 

approved December 6, 2001, IBR 

approved for § 431.444. 

§ 431.444 Test procedures for the 

measurement of energy efficiency. 

(a) Scope. Pursuant to section 

346(b)(1) of EPCA, this section provides 

the test procedures for measuring, 

pursuant to EPCA, the efficiency of 

small electric motors pursuant to EPCA. 

(42 U.S.C. 6317(b)(1)) For purposes of 

this Part 431 and EPCA, the test 

procedures for measuring the efficiency 

of small electric motors shall be the test 

procedures specified in § 431.444(b). 

(b) Testing and Calculations. 

Determine the energy efficiency and 

losses by using one of the following test 

methods: 

(1) Single-phase small electric motors: 

either IEEE Std 114, (incorporated by 

reference, see § 431.443), or CAN/CSA 

C747, (incorporated by reference, see 

§ 431.443); 

(2) Polyphase small electric motors 

less than or equal to 1 horsepower 

(0.746 kW): IEEE Std 112 (incorporated 

by reference, see § 431.443), Test 

Method A; or 

(3) Polyphase small electric motors 

greater than 1 horsepower (0.746 kW): 

IEEE Std 112 (incorporated by reference, 

see § 431.443), Test Method B. 

§ 431.445 Determination of small electric 

motor efficiency. 

(a) Scope. When a party determines 

the energy efficiency of a small electric 

motor to comply with an obligation 

imposed on it by or pursuant to Part A– 

1 of Title III of EPCA, 42 U.S.C. 6311– 

6317, this section applies. 

(b) Provisions applicable to all small 

electric motors—(1) General 

requirements. The average full-load 

efficiency of each basic model of small 

electric motor must be determined 

either by testing in accordance with 

§ 431.444 of this subpart, or by 

application of an alternative efficiency 

determination method (AEDM) that 

meets the requirements of paragraphs 

(a)(2) and (3) of this section, provided, 

however, that an AEDM may be used to 

determine the average full-load 

efficiency of one or more of a 

manufacturer’s basic models only if the 

average full-load efficiency of at least 

five of its other basic models is 

determined through testing. 

(2) Alternative efficiency 

determination method. An AEDM 

applied to a basic model must be: 

(i) Derived from a mathematical 

model that represents the mechanical 

and electrical characteristics of that 

basic model, and 

(ii) Based on engineering or statistical 

analysis, computer simulation or 

modeling, or other analytic evaluation 

of performance data. 

(3) Substantiation of an alternative 

efficiency determination method. Before 

an AEDM is used, its accuracy and 

reliability must be substantiated as 

follows: 

(i) The AEDM must be applied to at 

least five basic models that have been 

tested in accordance with § 431.444; and 

(ii) The predicted total power loss for 

each such basic model, calculated by 

applying the AEDM, must be within 

plus or minus 10 percent of the mean 

total power loss determined from the 

testing of that basic model. 

(4) Subsequent verification of an 

AEDM. (i) Each manufacturer that has 

used an AEDM under this section shall 

have available for inspection by the 

Department of Energy records showing 

the method or methods used; the 

mathematical model, the engineering or 

statistical analysis, computer simulation 

or modeling, and other analytic 

evaluation of performance data on 

which the AEDM is based; complete test 

data, product information, and related 

information that the manufacturer has 

generated or acquired pursuant to 

paragraph (a)(3) of this section; and the 

calculations used to determine the 

efficiency and total power losses of each 

basic model to which the AEDM was 

applied. 

(ii) If requested by the Department, 

the manufacturer shall conduct 

simulations to predict the performance 

of particular basic models of small 

electric motors specified by the 

Department, analyses of previous 

simulations conducted by the 

manufacturer, sample testing of basic 

models selected by the Department, or 

a combination of the foregoing. 

(c) Additional testing requirements— 

(1) Selection of basic models for testing 

if an AEDM is to be applied. 

(i) A manufacturer must select basic 

models for testing in accordance with 

the criteria that follow: 

(A) Two of the basic models must be 

among the five basic models with the 

highest unit volumes of production by 

the manufacturer in the prior year, or 

during the prior 12-month period before 

the effective date of the energy 

efficiency standard, whichever is later, 

and in identifying these five basic 

models, any small electric motor that 

does not comply with § 431.446 shall be 

excluded from consideration; 

(B) The basic models should be of 

different horsepower ratings without 

duplication; 

(C) At least one basic model should be 

selected from each of the frame number 

series for the designs of small electric 

motors for which the AEDM is to be 

used; and 

(D) Each basic model should have the 

lowest nominal full-load efficiency 

among the basic models with the same 

rating (‘‘rating’’ as used here has the 

same meaning as it has in the definition 

of ‘‘basic model’’). 

(ii) If it is impossible for a 

manufacturer to select basic models for 

testing in accordance with all of these 

criteria, the criteria shall be given 

priority in the order in which they are 

listed. Within the limits imposed by the 

criteria, basic models shall be selected 

randomly. 

(2) [RESERVED] 

Energy Conservation Standards 

§ 431.446 Small electric motors energy 

conservation standards and their effective 

dates. 

[Reserved] 

[FR Doc. E9–15795 Filed 7–6–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2009–0042; Airspace 

Docket No. 09–ANM–1] 

Modification of Class E Airspace; 

Montrose, CO 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action will modify Class 

E airspace at Montrose Regional Airport, 

32074 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 7, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 

Montrose, CO. Additional controlled 

airspace is necessary to accommodate 

aircraft using the Instrument Landing 

System (ILS) Localizer/Distance 

Measuring Equipment (LOC/DME) 

Standard Instrument Approach 

Procedure (SIAP) at Montrose Regional 

Airport, Montrose, CO. This will 

improve the safety of Instrument Flight 

Rules (IFR) aircraft executing the ILS 

LOC/DME SIAP at Montrose Regional 

Airport, Montrose, CO. 

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, 

October 22, 2009. The Director of the 

Federal Register approves this 

incorporation by reference action under 

1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual 

revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and 

publication of conforming amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Operations Support 

Group, Western Service Center, 1601 

Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057; 

telephone (425) 203–4537. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On April 13, 2009, the FAA published 

in the Federal Register a notice of 

proposed rulemaking to establish 

additional controlled airspace at 

Montrose, CO (74 FR 16812). Interested 

parties were invited to participate in 

this rulemaking effort by submitting 

written comments on the proposal to the 

FAA. No comments were received. 

Class E airspace designations are 

published in paragraph 6005 of FAA 

Order 7400.9S signed October 3, 2008, 

and effective October 31, 2008, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

part 71.1. The Class E airspace 

designations listed in this document 

will be published subsequently in that 

Order. 

The Rule 

This action amends Title 14 Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by 

amending the Class E airspace at 

Montrose, CO. Additional controlled 

airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface is necessary to 

accommodate IFR aircraft executing ILS 

LOC/DME approach procedures at 

Montrose Regional Airport, Montrose, 

CO. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that will only affect air 

traffic procedures and air navigation, it 

is certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAAs authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, 

Section 106 discusses the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the agency’s 

authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it establishes 

additional controlled airspace at 

Montrose Regional Airport, Montrose, 

CO. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

part 71 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9S, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

signed October 3, 2008, and effective 

October 31, 2008 is amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6005. Class E airspace areas 

extending upward from 700 feet or more 

above the surface of the earth. 

* * * * * 

ANM CO, E5 Montrose, CO [Modify] 

Montrose Regional Airport, CO 

(Lat. 38°30′35′′ N., long. 107°53′39′′ W.) 

Montrose VOR/DME 

(Lat. 38°30′23′′ N., long. 107°53′57′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 7.2-mile 

radius of the Montrose Regional Airport and 

within 4.3 miles northeast and 8.3 miles 

southwest of the Montrose VOR/DME 313° 

and 133° radials extending from 7.2 miles 

southeast to 21.4 miles northwest of the 

VOR/DME, and within 4 miles each side of 

the Montrose VOR/DME 360° radial 

extending to 13.6 miles north of the VOR/ 

DME; and that airspace extending upward 

from 1,200 feet above the surface within an 

area bounded by a point beginning at lat. 

38°40′00′′ N., long. 108°46′00′′ W.; to lat. 

38°25′00′′ N., long. 108°42′30′′ W.; to lat. 

37°58′00′′ N., long. 108°10′00′′ W.; to lat. 

38°09′00′′ N., long. 107°35′00′′ W.; to lat. 

38°43′00′′ N., long. 107°39′30′′ W.; to lat. 

38°51′30′′ N., long. 107°41′00′′ W.; to lat. 

39°01′00′′ N., long. 107°47′00′′ W.; to lat. 

39°01′00′′ N., long. 108°09′00′′ W.; thence to 

the point of beginning. 

* * * * * 

Issued in Seattle, Washington, on June 26, 

2009. 

H. Steve Karnes, 

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, 

Western Service Center. 

[FR Doc. E9–15876 Filed 7–6–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2009–0253; Airspace 

Docket No. 09–ANM–2] 

Modification of Class E Airspace; Twin 

Falls, ID 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action will modify Class 

E airspace at Twin Falls, ID. Additional 

controlled airspace is necessary to 

accommodate aircraft using a new VHF 

Omni-Directional Radio Range (VOR) 

Standard Instrument Approach 

Procedure (SIAP) at Twin Falls Joslin 

Field—Magic Valley Regional, Twin 

Falls, ID. This will improve the safety of 

Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) aircraft 

executing the new VOR SIAP at Twin 

Falls Joslin Field—Magic Valley 

Regional, Twin Falls, ID. 

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, 

October 22, 2009. The Director of the 

Federal Register approves this 

incorporation by reference action under 

1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual 

revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and 

publication of conforming amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Operations Support