alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of VS Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended
June 27, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael G. Archbold, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of VS Holdings, Inc.
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 11, 2009



/s/ Michael G. ArchboldMichael G. ArchboldChief Financial and Chief Operating Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
; ..... 

\ 

EX PARTE: 

WR-83,446-01 

T.C. NO. 970D11232 

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

OF TEXAS 

BENJAMIN ELIAS 

WR-83,446-01 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

AUSTIN, TEXAS 

Transmitted 7/24/2015 8:51 :29 AM 

Accepted 7/24/2015 9:07:36 AM 

ABEL ACOSTA 

CLERK 

RECEIVED 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

7/24/2015 

ABELACOSTA,CLERK 

MOTION DISMISSED 

DATE: -~- J·J-t S 

fSY: ~v 

APPLICANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION/REHEARING 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: 

COMES NOW, the Applicant, Benjamin Elias and files his Motion for 

Reconsideration/Rehearing. Applicant would show the Court the following: 

(a) On June 12, 2015, the Court received Applicant's writ application. 

(b) On July 8, 2015, the Court denied relief without a written order. 

(c) On June 25, 2015, the trial court (Hon. Luis Aguilar, 243rd District Court) 

issued a bench warrant for purposes of an evidentiary hearing to be held on 

July 15, 2015. 

(d) The evidentiary hearing was actually conducted on July 16, 2015. 

(e) At the hearing, the State notified the Court and Applicant that relief had 

already been denied by the Court of Criminal Appeals. 

(f) Undersigned counsel had been appointed to pursue Applicant's 11.07 writ. At 

the evidentiary hearing, and over State's objection, the trial court heard 

matters, and took same under advisement. 

(g) Because Applicant had been bench-warranted to El Paso County, he had not 

ELECTRONIC 

RECORD 
yet received notice that the Court of Criminal Appeals had denied relief. 

(h) Applicant and the trial court await ruling upon the instant motion in order to 

determine further action. 

(i) Applicant moves that the Honorable Court of Criminal Appeals reconsider its 

decision denying relief, withdraw the order denying relief and wait until such 

time as the trial court submits its proposed findings and until such time as the 

court reporter sends a copy of the reporter's record to the District Clerk for 

transmittal to the Court of Criminal Appeals. 

PRAYER 

WHEREFORE, Applicant prays that the Honorable Court of Criminal Appeals 

reconsider its denial of relief until the trial court submits its proposed findings and until 

the reporter's record is sent to the Court of Criminal Appeals for review; and then render 

a decision based upon these new matters now brought before the Honorable Court. 

Applicant thanks the Honorable Court. 

Respectfully submitted, 

IS/ Matthew DeKoatz 

Matthew ·DeKoatz, Attorney at Law 

P.O. Box 1886 

El Paso, Texas 79950 

if (915) 626-8833 

~ (915) 541-8892 

State bar ID: 05722300 
\~ 

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE 

I, MATTHEW DEKOATZ, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

instrument, on this day, July 24, 2015, has been delivered via electronic mail to Mr. Tom 

Darnold, Esquire (Chief of the Appellate Division) of the office of the El Paso County 

District Attorney, 500 East San Antonio, 2nd floor, El Paso, Texas, 79901. 

/S/ Matthew DeKoatz 

MATTHEW DEKOATZ 

~-·-
HUGHES JUSTICE COMPLEX • TELEPHONE: (609) 984-9504 • FAX: (609) 777-3120

 New Jersey Is An Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed on Recycled Paper and Recyclable

CHRIS CHRISTIE

Governor

State of New Jersey

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY

DIVISION OF LAW

PAULA T. DOW

Attorney General

KIM GUADAGNO

Lt. Governor

25 MARKET STREET

 PO BOX 112

TRENTON, NJ 08625-0112

ROBERT M. HANNA

Director

March 9, 2011

Via ECF Only

Honorable Williams H. Walls, U.S.D.J.

M.L. King, Jr. Federal Bldg. & Courthouse, Room 4046

50 Walnut Street

Newark, NJ 07102

Re: Muller, et al. v. Maenza, et al.

Docket No. 2:10-cv-006110-WHW-CCC 

Dear Judge Walls:

I represent the State defendants in the above-referenced

matter. I write with the consent of counsel for the plaintiffs,

David D. Jensen, Esq., to request a three-business-day enlargement

to the briefing schedule that the Court entered on February 17,

2011, (District Document #28) as set forth in the enclosed proposed

Second Revised Scheduling Order. Thank you for your consideration.

Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not

hesitate to contact me or either counsel for Plaintiffs.

Respectfully Submitted,

PAULA T. DOW

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY

By: /s/ Gregory A. Spellmeyer 

Gregory A. Spellmeyer

Deputy Attorney General

Case 2:10-cv-06110-WHW -CCC Document 33 Filed 03/09/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 359
March 9, 2011

Page 2

 HUGHES JUSTICE COMPLEX • TELEPHONE: (609) 984-9504 • FAX: (609) 777-3120

 New Jersey Is An Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed on Recycled Paper and Recyclable

cc/email only:

David D. Jensen, Esq.

DAVID JENSEN pllc

708 Third Avenue, Sixth Floor

New York, New York 10017

david@djensenpllc.com

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Robert H. Oostdyk, Esq.

Johnson & Murphy

P.O. Box 70

Riverdale, NJ 07457

roostdyk@johnsonmurphylaw.com

Attorney for Codefendant Chief Richard Cook

Brian G. Howell, Esq.

Howell & Bertman

231 Bellevue Avenue

Hammonton, NJ 08037-1751

howellbg&comcast.net

Attorney for Codefendant Chief Frank Ingemi

Case 2:10-cv-06110-WHW -CCC Document 33 Filed 03/09/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 360
**Exhibit 32****.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Shermen WSC Acquisition Corp. (the“Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
|                               |   | /s/ Francis P. Jenkins, Jr. |
|-------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                          |   | Name:                       | Francis P. Jenkins, Jr. |
|                          |   | Title:                      | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and |
|                          |   |                        | Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
|                          |   |                        |   |
| Dated:  August  14, 2007 |   |                        |   |

 

----
#### Joel B. Waterman, Appellant, v Weinstein Memorial Chapel et al., Respondents.

[853 NYS2d 623]

The plaintiff commenced the instant action, inter alia, to re*718cover damages for emotional distress he allegedly suffered as a result of the alleged mishandling of his mother’s remains during funeral services and interment. With respect to the plaintiffs allegations of negligent and intentional mishandling of the body, the movants, in support of their separate motions, made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Sarlo v Fairchild Sons, 256*AD2d 322 [1998j; *cf. Massaro v O’Shea Funeral Home,*292 AD2d 349 [2002]). In opposition, the plaintiff offered his deposition testimony that the casket and vault were defective and failed adequately to protect the remains from outside contaminants but failed to support his conclusions with evidence establishing the existence of the alleged defects or the opinion of an expert that the casket and vault would fail to protect the remains. Thus, his conclusory allegations were insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]).

With respect to the cause of action alleging fraud, in opposition to the defendants’ establishment, prima facie, of their entitlement to summary judgment, the plaintiff failed to make a sufficient evidentiary showing to raise a triable issue as to whether the defendants made misrepresentations *(see Del Vecchio v Nassau County,*118 AD2d 615, 618 [1986]; *Brown v Lockwood,*76 AD2d 721, 730-731 [1980]).

The plaintiff contends that certain statutes and regulations governing the funeral home industry give rise to a private right of action. This argument is raised for the first time on appeal and is not properly before this Court *(see Pile v Grant,*41 AD3d 810, 811 [2007]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.P., Skelos, Santucci and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of Sharper Image Corporation, a Delaware corporation (Sharper Image), does hereby certify that:

a) The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006 (the Form 10-K) of Sharper Image fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Sharper Image.



|    |  |                                                                    
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    JEFFREY P.
FORGAN                                           
|    |  | Jeffrey P. Forgan Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer

May 1, 2006
#### BOONE v. SOUTHERN RY. CO.

No. 9138.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

March 29, 1949.

Joseph Weiner (of Freedman, Landy & Lorry), of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

J. B. H. Carter (of Evans, Bayard & Frick), of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

GANEY, District Judge.

 Plaintiff, a citizen of Massachusetts, brought an action against the defendant, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Virginia, for injuries allegedly sustained by her while the train on which she was a passenger was leaving Washington, D. C. enroute to Alexandria, Virginia. Defendant filed a motion under Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to set aside service of summons for the asserted reason that it is not amenable to process in this state. Subsequently the plaintiff filed written interrogatories directed to the issue raised by the defendant’s motion to which the defendant filed objections on two grounds. The first is that it is not an adverse party within the meaning of Rule 33. A court has jurisdiction over the persons and subject matter of an action until it rules to the contrary. United States v. Shipp, 203 U.S. 563, 573, 27 S.Ct. 165, 51 L.Ed. 319, 8 Ann. Cas., 265; United States v. United Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258, 290-293, 67 S.Ct. 677, 91 L.Ed. 884. It follows, of course, that those named in the caption of the summons and complaint of an action are parties thereto within the meaning of the Rules until the court decides otherwise. Silk v. Sieling, D.C.E.D.Pa., 7 F.R.D. 576.

The other ground is that the interrogatories are such as would cause annoyance, expense, and oppression to the defendant without serving any relevant purpose to the issue of jurisdiction involved. Under the circumstances this ground is too general to be entertained by us. We will therefore overrule the objections and reserve to the defendant the right to make complaint to the particular question, stating its specific reason therefor, which it considers objectionable.
EXHIBIT 23.2


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-33497, 33-40038, 33-60214 and 33-60644 on Form S-8 of Criticare Systems, Inc.
of  our  reports  dated August 20, 1998, appearing in this Annual Report on Form
10-K  of  Criticare  Systems,  Inc.  for  the  year  ended  June  30,  2000.



/s/  Deloitte  &  Touche  LLP
Milwaukee,  Wisconsin
September  25,  2000
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 22, 2015

No. 04-15-00451-CV

IN RE STATE FARM LLOYDS

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

On July 20. 2015, relator State Farm Lloyds filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an 

opposed motion for temporary relief. This court is of the opinion that a serious question 

concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest may file a response to the petition 

for writ of mandamus in this court no later than August 13, 2015. Any such response must 

conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. 

Relator’s request for temporary relief is GRANTED. The trial court’s order signed July 

16, 2015 requiring relator to produce specified documents in response to plaintiffs’ requests for 

production is temporarily stayed pending final resolution of the mandamus petition filed in this 

court.

It is so ORDERED on July 22, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 2014-CVF-001162 D1, styled Raul Rodriguez and Noemi Rodriguez v. 

State Farm Lloyds and Felipe Farias, and 2014-CVF-001048 D1, styled Alma Pena v. State Farm Lloyds and Becky 

Lanier, pending in the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Jose A. Lopez presiding.
<PAGE>   1




                                   EXHIBIT 23










                                       30


<PAGE>   2






INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
     Criticare Systems, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (File Nos. 33-33497, 33-40038, 33-60214 and 33-60644) of our reports dated
August 15, 1997 included and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Criticare Systems, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 1997.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
October 10, 1997
July 23, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF K.T. AND R.D.T., CHILDREN

NO. 14-15-00504-CV 

________________________________

Today the Court heard the parties’ joint motion to set aside the judgment 

signed by the court below on May 15, 2015. Having considered the motion and 

found it meritorious, we order the judgment VACATED AND REMAND the 

cause to the trial court for proceedings in accordance with this Court's opinion. 

We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 13, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 13, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0228. BRIAN SUMMERS, TRUSTEE OF THE SUMMERS FAMILY LIVING

TRUST v. EDWARD L. WASDIN et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

14CV0245
ACCEPTED

01-14-00976-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/22/2015 5:34:30 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/22/2015 5:34:30 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Court OfCriminal Appeals

PO Box 12308

Eastland, TX 76448-0271

July 13,2015

WesMau

Criminal District Attorney

Hays County Government Center

712 South Stagecoach Trail, Suite 2057

San Marcos, Texas 78666

(512)393-7600 FAX (512)393-2246

www.co.hays.tx.us

RE: Court ofCriminal Appeals Number:

Court ofAppeals Number:

Trial Court Case Number:

STYLE: Tienda v. State

Dear Clerk:

PD-0684-15

11-11-00283-CR

CR-07-0802

This letter is in regard to appellate case number 11-11-00283-CR, styled Tienda v. State. The

State withdraws its First Motion for Extension of Time in Which to File Petition for

Discretionary Review, as it no longer intends to file a Petition for Discretionary Review.

ectfally^ubmitted,

'Angie'Roberts-'Hdckaby^^

Assistant Criminal District Attorney

Hays County, Texas

Hays County Government center

712 South Stagecoach Trail, Ste. 2057

San Marcos, Texas 78666

angie.roberts(5)co.hays.tx.us

(512) 393-7600

(512) 393-2246 fax

State Bar No. 24081797
# table85_q11.1_naics
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          53,080
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                    34,252
<INVENTORY>                                     24,180
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               191,001
<PP&E>                                          31,745
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 208,843
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          456,521
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,296,850
<COMMON>                                     1,556,396
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   208,843
<SALES>                                        371,198
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               371,198
<CGS>                                          181,250
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  181,250
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,223
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,570
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (855,459)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (855,459)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (855,459)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)
        






</TABLE>
# table37_q5.2_naics
TDCI Offender Details Page | of 2

ZB, (0B - Ol

Ne:

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF: CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Offender Information Details
Return to Search list

SID Number: 05335093
TDCJ Number: 00848605
Name: JONES, KELVIN
Race: B

Gender: M

DOB: 1964-08-18
Maximum Sentence Date: 2028-06-11
Current Facility: CONNALLY
Projected Release Date: 2028-06-11
Parole Eligibility Date: 2002-08-22
Offender Visitation Eligible: YES:

Information provided is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times per day
on visitation days. Because this information is subject to change, family members and
friends are encouraged to call the unit prior to traveling for a visit.

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE:

Scheduled Release Date: Offender is not scheduled for release at this time.
Scheduled Release Type: Will be determined when release date is scheduled.
Scheduled Release Location: Will be determined when release date is scheduled.

Offense History:
Offense Date Offense Sentence Date County Case No. Sentence (YY-MM-DD)
1998-06-10 ROBBERY 1998-10-05 BOWIE | 98-F-396-5 30-00-00

http://offender.tdcj.texas.gov/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=05335093 7/24/2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31,
1996 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          59,022
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               133,158
<PP&E>                                          17,338
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 549,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,371
<BONDS>                                        110,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     312,735
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   549,322
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,313
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,093
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,935
<INCOME-TAX>                                       621
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,314
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,314
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
        

</TABLE>