alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DOUCETTE v. EASTERN STATES TRANSP. CO., Inc.

No. 241.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

Sept. 25, 1939.

*67A. L. Kaplan and James Hoy, both of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

John J. Mulcahy and Samuel P. Sears, both of Boston, Mass., for defendant.

FORD, District Judge.

This is an action for personal injuries based upon the alleged negligence of the defendant company, its agents or servants, in the operation of a motor vehicle on the highway. The defendant objects to the following interrogatories filed by the plaintiff: “6. State when the brakes on the said motor vehicle were last inspected before the alleged accident.”

I cannot see how it is material when the brakes of the automobile were examined in this action for negligent operation. The issue involved is the operation of the car at the time of the accident. No answer is required.

“7. State- the name and address of the person or firm that inspected the said brakes referred to in the preceding interrogatories.”

The decision on the preceding interrogatory controls the decision on this interrogatory, and accordingly need not be answered.

“25. State in detail what if anything was done by the operator of the defendant’s truck in the attempt to avoid the alleged accident?”

This need not be answered, inasmuch as it asks for a conclusion and opinion and not a fact.

“27. Please state in detail the commission or omission of any act or acts on the part of the plaintiff which in any way contributed to the alleged accident as alleged in the defendant’s answer to the plaintiff’s declaration.”

No answer is required to this interrogatory. It calls for a conclusion and opinion.

The plaintiff filed objection to interrogatory No. 26 filed by the defendant, which reads as follows: “Please state fully and in detail what act or acts the defendant did or failed to do which caused you injury.”

This need not be answered, inasmuch as it calls for an expression of opinion and conclusion.
DM1\2507956.1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

JEFFREY M. MULLER; et al.,

 Plaintiffs, 

v.

THE HON. PHILIP J. MAENZA,et al.,

 Defendants. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2:10-CV-6110 (WHW) (CCC) 

[PROPOSED]

REVISED 

SCHEDULING ORDER

On the consent of the parties, the Court amends the Scheduling Order entered on 

December 9, 2010 (Doc. No. 11) as follows: 

• Plaintiffs will reply in support of summary judgment and oppose Defendants’ crossmotion no later than February 18, 2011; and 

• Defendants will submit a reply in support of their cross-motion no later than 

March 11, 2011. 

It is SO ORDERED this ____ day of February, 2011. 

 William H. Walls 

United States District Judge 

Case 2:10-cv-06110-WHW -CCC Document 27-1 Filed 02/16/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 237

17

/s/ William H. Walls

th

Case 2:10-cv-06110-WHW-MCA Document 28 Filed 02/17/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 238
TO: CLERK OF COURT

FROM: Cynthia Berry, CSR

Former Official Court Reporter for 129th

Current Official Court Reporter for the 334th

RE: 01-15-00264-CV, Rodney P. Hunt v. Vicky Stovall

Trial Court Cause Number: 2010-68881

The appeal of this case was originally received by me on 3/24/15. 

I can provide a chronology of events if the Court would prefer, but I am including 

the most recent communication received from Appellant’s attorney, Sonya 

Chandler-Anderson. It is as follows:

“I am withdrawing I am at a stand still. I have called Mr. Hunts assistant 

Amy and I have asked her to have him call me he has not. I have cc her on 

this email may be she will get him to call me or pay the fee. Amy has been 

informed and sent emails about the fees to pay them and they have not. I 

think he does not have the money to pay the fees. However, no matter I can 

not proceed on a case without it, so I am withdrawing. I am trying to file the 

motion to withdraw, but due to my illness I am so behind. I am sorry

MAY GOD'S WILL BE DONE

Sonya Chandler Anderson Esq.

Law Office of Chandler Anderson and Associates

P.O. Box 2263

Houston, Texas 77252

(281) 905-5020 Cell Telephone

(866) 274-8878 Fax”

I am not sure if she means she is withdrawing as the attorney, or withdrawing the 

appeal, or both. No payment has been received, so unless otherwise directed by 

the Court, I will not be filing the record in this matter.

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/27/2015 11:45:01 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
THE TOPPS COMPANY, INC.
                              ONE WHITEHALL STREET
                             NEW YORK, NY 10004-2109


May 27, 1998


Mr. Arthur T. Shorin
400 East 56th Street
New York, NY 10022

Dear Mr. Shorin:

The Topps Company,  Inc. (the "Company") hereby agrees with you to the following
amendment to your Employment Agreement with the Company, dated as of October 28,
1991,  as amended on May 18, 1994,  May 19, 1995,  May 22, 1996 and May 22, 1997
(the "Agreement") (the amendments to the Agreement  hereafter referred to as the
"Amendments").

This will  confirm your  agreement to the limited  reduction of your annual base
salary for  calendar  year 1998 by  $246,000  in  consideration  for the Company
granting to you options for an additional  246,000 shares of common stock of the
Company. This limited reduction will entitle you to an annual base salary during
1998 equal to $576,000.

The  amendment  set forth herein shall apply only to your annual base salary for
the 1998 calendar year,  shall be limited  precisely as written and shall not be
deemed to be a  modification  or waiver of any right or remedy which the parties
hereto may now have or may have in the future  under or in  connection  with the
Agreement,  the  Company's  Pension Plan, as  supplemented  by the  supplemental
pension  benefit  arrangement  between  the  Company and you as set forth in the
letter  agreement  dated May 19, 1986,  as amended on May 18, 1994 (the "Pension
Agreement")  or the  Company's  Incentive  Bonus Plan for fiscal  year 1999 (the
"Bonus Plan"), including,  without limitation, (I) the right to have termination
payments  required to be made under  Section 7 of the  Agreement  calculated  to
include all salary  increases  required to have been provided under the terms of
the Agreement,  without regard to the limited  waivers of such increases made by
the Amendments,  or the reduction provided for in this amendment, (ii) the right
to have benefits required to be made under the Pension  Agreement  calculated to
include your 1998 salary with the reduction  provided for in this amendment,  or
(iii) the right to have you bonus  opportunity  and  consequential  bonus amount
under the  Bonus  Plan  calculated  to  include  your 1998  salary  without  the
reduction  provided  for in this  amendment.  Except  as  provided  herein,  the
Agreement  shall remain  unchanged and in full force and effect.  This Amendment
may be executed in  counterparts,  which taken together shall constitute one and
the same amendatory instrument.

<PAGE>

This  Amendment  shall be governed by and  construed  and enforced in accordance
with the laws of the State of New York.

Very truly yours,

THE TOPPS COMPANY, INC.


By:_______________________          __________________________
                                         Arthur T. Shorin
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [NM-920-1310-08; OKNM 119294]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease.

# SUMMARY:

Under the Class II provisions of Title IV, Public Law 97-451, The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease OKNM 119294 from the lessee, Plano Petroleum, LLC, for lands in Ellis County, Oklahoma. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Margie Dupre, BLM, New Mexico State Office, at (505) 438-7520.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    No valid lease has been issued that affects the lands. The lessee agrees to new lease terms for rentals and royalties of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year, and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee paid the required $500.00 administrative fee for the reinstatement of the lease and $166.00 cost for publishing this Notice in the                     **Federal Register.**                     The lessee met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). We are proposing to reinstate lease OKNM 119294, effective the date of termination, December 1, 2008, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.                

Dated: March 18, 2009.

Margie Dupre,

Land Law Examiner, Fluids Adjudication Team.

[FR Doc. E9-15657 Filed 7-1-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1310-FI-P
Case 2:10-cv-06480-ES Document 40 Filed 03/28/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 376
Case 2:10-cv-06480-ES Document 40 Filed 03/28/13 Page 2 of 10 PageID: 377
Case 2:10-cv-06480-ES Document 40 Filed 03/28/13 Page 3 of 10 PageID: 378
Case 2:10-cv-06480-ES Document 40 Filed 03/28/13 Page 4 of 10 PageID: 379
Case 2:10-cv-06480-ES Document 40 Filed 03/28/13 Page 5 of 10 PageID: 380
Case 2:10-cv-06480-ES Document 40 Filed 03/28/13 Page 6 of 10 PageID: 381
Case 2:10-cv-06480-ES Document 40 Filed 03/28/13 Page 7 of 10 PageID: 382
Case 2:10-cv-06480-ES Document 40 Filed 03/28/13 Page 8 of 10 PageID: 383
Case 2:10-cv-06480-ES Document 40 Filed 03/28/13 Page 9 of 10 PageID: 384
Case 2:10-cv-06480-ES Document 40 Filed 03/28/13 Page 10 of 10 PageID: 385
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stem Cell Therapy International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Calvin Cao, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1. the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:     August 21, 2006
                                         /s/Calvin Cao
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Calvin Cao, President


                                       1
|   |  • | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|---------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   |  • | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      combined predecessors of thePartnership. |
|--------|---------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 11, 2009 | /s/MICHAEL E. MERCER                               |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                    | Michael      E. Mercer                             |
|                    | Chief      Financial Officer of EV Management LLC, |
|                    | general      partner of EV Energy GP, L.P.,        |
|                    | general      partner of EV Energy Partners,L.P.    |

----
~CJA 20 APPOINTMENT OF AND AUTHORITY TO PAY COURT-APPOINTED COUNSEL (Rev. 12/03) 

l. CIR.IDIST:i DIV. CODE 2. PERSON REPRESENTED 

TERRY HAUPT 

3. MAG. DKT~/DEF. NUMBER 4. DIST: DKT.IDEF. NUMBER 

CR10-866-01 (MLC) 

VOUCHER NUMBER 

5. APPEALS DKT.IDEF. NUMBER 6. OTHER DKT. NUMBER 

7. IN CASE/MATTER OF (Case Name) 8. PAY!vlENT CATEGORY 9. TYPE PERSON REPRESENTED 10. REPRESENTATION TYPE 

~Felony D Petty Offense ~ Adult Defendant D Appellant (See Instructions) 

USA V. HAUPT D Misdemeanor D Other D Juvenile Defendant D Appellee SR 

D A eai D Other 

1 L OFFENSE(S) CllARGED (Cite-tJ.S. ·code, ·Title & Section) If more than one offense, -list (up to five) major offenses charged. according to severity of offense. 

Ct 1 - 21 :846 CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE CRACK (8/09-9/09) 

12. ATTORNEY'S NAME (First Name, Ml., Last Na.me, including any suffix), 

AND MAILING ADDRESS 

ANTHONY G. SIMONETTI 

PO BOX 1562 

HIGHTSTOWN, NJ 08520 

13. COURT ORDER 

Gl 0 Appointing Counsel 

D F Subs For Federal Defender 

D P Subs For Panel Attorney 

D C Co-Counsel 

D R Subs For Retained Attorney 

D Y Standby Counsel 

Prior Attorney's Name: ---------------------

Appointment Dates: ------------- ~ Because the above-named person represented has testified under oath or has otherWise 

Telephone Number: ______ (_6_0_9_)_4_4_3_-3_9_9_8 _____ _ satisfied this Court that he or she ( l) is financially unable to employ counsel and (2) does t--------------------------------1 not wish to waive counsel, and because the interests of justice so require, the attorney whose 14. NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS OF LAW FIRM (Only provide per instructions) name appears in Item 12 is appointed to represent this person in this case, OR 

D Other (See lfistructio 

3/8/2018 1/7/2018 

Date of Order Nunc Pro Tune bate 

Repayment or partial repayment ordered from the person represented for this service at time 

appointment. 0 YES 0 NO 

15. 

16. 

FROM: TO: 

22. CLAIM ST A TUS 0 Final Payment 0 Interim Payment Number D Supplemental Payment 

Have you previously applied to the court for compensation and/or reimbursement for this 0 YES D NO If yes, were you paid? 0 YES D NO 

Other than frOitl the Court, have you, or to your knowledge has anyone else, received payment (compensation or anything of value) from ariy other source in connection With this 

representation? 0 YES 0 NO lfyes, give details on additional sheets. 

I swear or aftlrm the truth or correctness of the above statements. 

:28. SIGNATIJRE OF'THE PRESIDING JUDGE DATE 

29. IN COURT COMP. 30. OUT OF COURT COMP. 31. TRAVEL EXPENSES 32. OTHER EXPENSES 

34. SIGNATURE OF CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF APPEALS (OR DELEGATE) Payment approved DA TE 

in excess of the statutory threshold amount. 

28a JUDGE CODE 

33 .. TOTAL AMT. APPROVED 

$0.00 

34a. JUDGE CODE
Exhibit 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tetragenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  Neil
Martucci,  Chief  Financial  Officer  hereby  certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.




                                                     /s/ NEIL MARTUCCI
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Neil Martucci
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     May 20, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 976 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 976

  Authorizing and directing the Committee on the Judiciary to inquire 
whether the House of Representatives should impeach Emmet G. Sullivan, 
    a judge of the United States District Court for the District of 
                               Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2020

   Mr. Johnson of Ohio submitted the following resolution; which was 
                   referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing and directing the Committee on the Judiciary to inquire 
whether the House of Representatives should impeach Emmet G. Sullivan, 
    a judge of the United States District Court for the District of 
                               Columbia.

    Resolved, That the Committee on the Judiciary shall inquire whether 
the House of Representatives should impeach Emmet G. Sullivan, a judge 
of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
    Sec. 2.  The Committee on the Judiciary or any subcommittee or task 
force designated by the Committee may, in connection with the inquiry 
under this resolution, take affidavits and depositions by a member, 
counsel, or consultant of the Committee, pursuant to notice or 
subpoena.
    Sec. 3.  There shall be paid out of the applicable accounts of the 
House of Representatives such sums as may be necessary to assist the 
Committee on the Judiciary in conducting the inquiry under this 
resolution, any of which may be used for the procurement of staff or 
consultant services.
    Sec. 4. (a) For the purpose of the inquiry under this resolution, 
the Committee on the Judiciary is authorized to require by subpoena or 
otherwise--
            (1) the attendance and testimony of any person (including 
        at a taking of a deposition by a member, counsel, or consultant 
        of the Committee); and
            (2) the production of such things,
as it deems necessary to such inquiry.
    (b) The Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary, after 
consultation with the Ranking Member, may exercise the authority of the 
Committee under subsection (a).
    (c) The Committee on the Judiciary may adopt a rule regulating the 
taking of depositions by a member, counsel, or consultant of the 
Committee.
                                 <all>
```
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00988-CV

GUILLERMINA SANDOVAL AND OGILVER SANDOVAL, Appellants

V.

AMERICAN POINTE REALTY, LTD, Appellee

Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 

1054737).

TO THE COUNTY CIVIL COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF HARRIS COUNTY, 

GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 7th day of July 2015, the case upon appeal to revise or to 

reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

After due consideration, the Court grants the 

appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss, construed as a 

motion to set aside the trial court’s judgment. Accordingly, 

the Court sets aside the trial court’s judgment and renders 

judgment effectuating the parties’ Rule 6.6 agreement, 

namely for the trial clerk to release the $6,225.00 in funds the 

appellants posted as security after receipt of the mandate and,

within three business days of the entry of this Court’s 

judgment, for the appellee to pay appellants $4,275.00.

The Court orders that the appellants pay all appellate 

costs.
The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered July 7, 2015.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Justices 

Keyes, Huddle, and Lloyd.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court 

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

July 17, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
EXHIBIT 23.1



                   CONSENT OF BDO SEIDMAN, LLP



Spectrum Information Technologies, Inc.
Purchase, New York


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference and inclusion
in the Prospectus constituting a part of the Registration
Statements listed on the accompanying index of our report dated
June 19, 1997, relating to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Spectrum Information Technologies, Inc. and
subsidiaries appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended March 31, 1997.




/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
-------------------------
BDO Seidman, LLP



June 25, 1997


<PAGE>



                       Index of Registration Statements



              Form                        Date
              ----                        ----
              S-8                         March 31, 1997
              S-8                         March 31, 1997
              S-8                         December 1, 1993
              S-3                         February 19,1993
              S-3                         November 3, 1992
              S-3                         October 15, 1992
              S-3                         August 31, 1992
              S-3                         July 9, 1992
              S-3                         May 28, 1992
              S-3                         May 28, 1992
              S-8                         January 23, 1992
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00193-CR

Stanley Dale Self

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 367th District Court

of Denton County (F-90-478-E)

July 23, 2015

Opinion by Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Bonnie Sudderth_______________

 Justice Bonnie Sudderth