alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tianyin Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, Guoqing Jiang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
 
 
 Date:  May 16, 2011
 
 
 /s/   Guoqing JiangGuoqing JiangChief Executive Officer & Chairman
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Abington Bancorp, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned James P.
McDonough, President and chief executive Officer, and James K. Hunt, Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Abington Bancorp, Inc.,
certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/S/ JAMES P. MCDONOUGH                    /S/ JAMES K. HUNT
---------------------------               ---------------------------
James P. McDonough                        James K. Hunt
President and Chief Executive Officer     Executive Vice President,
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date:    March 12, 2004

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Archon Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Paul W. Lowden, Chairman of
the Board, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company and Grant L. Siler, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), that to his knowledge:



| |  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: October 12, 2010                                         
|                                                                
|/s/ Paul W. Lowden                                              
|Paul W. Lowden                                                  
|Chairman of the Board, President
And Principal Executive Officer
|                                                                
|/s/ Grant L. Siler                                              
|Grant L. Siler                                                  
|Principal Accounting Officer
Case 2:11-cv-00427-JLL-MAH Document 57 Filed 07/03/12 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 324
Case 2:11-cv-00427-JLL-MAH Document 57 Filed 07/03/12 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 325
Case 2:11-cv-00427-JLL-MAH Document 57 Filed 07/03/12 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 326
Case 2:11-cv-00427-JLL-MAH Document 57 Filed 07/03/12 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 327
Case 2:10-cv-06424-FSH -PS Document 39 Filed 04/27/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 340
Case 2:10-cv-06424-FSH -PS Document 39 Filed 04/27/11 Page 2 of 7 PageID: 341
Case 2:10-cv-06424-FSH -PS Document 39 Filed 04/27/11 Page 3 of 7 PageID: 342
Case 2:10-cv-06424-FSH -PS Document 39 Filed 04/27/11 Page 4 of 7 PageID: 343
Case 2:10-cv-06424-FSH -PS Document 39 Filed 04/27/11 Page 5 of 7 PageID: 344
Case 2:10-cv-06424-FSH -PS Document 39 Filed 04/27/11 Page 6 of 7 PageID: 345
Case 2:10-cv-06424-FSH -PS Document 39 Filed 04/27/11 Page 7 of 7 PageID: 346
(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
period ended March 31, 2011 (the Report), filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
  /s/ Marc J. EisenbergMarc J. EisenbergPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15I0246. GEORGE ZACKERY GOLDBERG et al. v. JOE KELLY.

George Zackery Goldberg, individually, and the law firm of Goldberg &

Dohan, LLP (collectively “Goldberg”) seek interlocutory appeal from a trial court

order denying their motion to open default in this case. The trial court issued its order

on April 22, 2015, and issued a certificate of immediate review on April 28, 2015.

However, Goldberg did not file their application for interlocutory appeal until June

29, 2015. 

Goldberg argue in a supplement to their application that they attempted to file

their application on May 7, 2015, but this Court returned the application because

Goldberg failed to comply with our Court rules. According to Goldberg, they did not

receive notice of the returned application because it was “inexplicably filtered out as

“SPAM” in counsel’s e-mail server.” To the extent that Goldberg’s ability to properly

file a timely application that comported with this Court’srules wasfrustrated by their

own computer system, their remedy would be to petition the trial court to vacate and

re-enter the order and certificate of immediate review. 

It is well-established that under OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), an application for

interlocutory appeal must be filed within 10 days of the date on which a timely

certificate of immediate review is entered in the court below. See Genter v. State, 218

Ga. App. 311 (460 SE2d 879) (1995). Because this application was filed 62 days

after entry of the certificate of immediate review, it is untimely and is therefore

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

July 15, 2015
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/15/2015
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ERNESTO LAFRIENZA,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-13-00121-CR

Appeal from the

34th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20120D03040)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State=s third motion for extension of time to file the brief 

until February 25, 2014. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

THE STATE=S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime Esparza, the State’s Attorney, prepare the 

State=s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before February 25, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of February, 2014.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
Supreme Court ofthe United States

Office ofthe Clerk

Washington, DC 20543-0001

Scott S. Harris

Clerk ofthe Court

July 13, 2015 (202)479-3011

Clerk

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

P.O. Box 12308

Capitol Station

Austin, TX 78711

Re: David Abran Anaya

v. Texas

No. 15-5166

(Your No. WR-80,336-04; WR-80,336-04)

Dear Clerk:

The petition for a writ of certiorari in the above entitled case was filed on July

7, 2015 and placed on the docket July 13, 2015 as No. 15-5166.

Sincerely,

Scott S. Harris, Clerk

©OURTOFCRHWIWAL APPEALS
# table161_q16.3_state
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,875]

In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on May 1, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Eastern Display, a Division of Art Guild, Inc., Providence, Rhode Island.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 9th day of June 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-15301 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Susser Holdings Corporation (the Company) for the three months ended June 28,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sam L. Susser, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 7, 2009



/s/ Sam L. SusserSam L. SusserPresident and Chief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                  13,511,000
<SECURITIES>                           168,750,000
<RECEIVABLES>                           12,842,000
<ALLOWANCES>                             1,023,000
<INVENTORY>                             13,004,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       208,407,000
<PP&E>                                  25,031,000
<DEPRECIATION>                          19,511,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         223,265,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   18,921,000
<BONDS>                                  1,806,000
<COMMON>                                 3,445,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      1
<OTHER-SE>                             199,092,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           223,265,000
<SALES>                                 68,372,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        68,372,000
<CGS>                                   36,590,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           36,590,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        41,733,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      12,361,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          2,410,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      2,410,000
<DISCONTINUED>                         (24,063,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                           (21,653,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (2.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (2.12)




</TABLE>
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Ting Pong Cheung, the Chief Financial Officer of
CHINA INTERACTIVE EDUCATION, INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 19th day of August, 2010.

/s/ Ting Pong CheungTing Pong Cheung
Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Interactive Education, Inc. and will be retained by China Interactive Education, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
#### United States *v.*Durham.

*(District Court, W. D. South Carolina.*

February, 1888.)

Internal Revenue—Special License—To Retail at Distillery—Sales Covered by.

If persons dealing in liquor have paid the special retail tax for retailing at tbe distillery, they may receive and fill orders at their place of business, and send the liquor to persons residing at a distance. But they cannot make sales in small quantities from barrels to persons along the road, who pay them on receipt of the liquor. . ,

Indictment for carrying on the business of retail liquor dealer, without having paid the special tax.

*G. M. Furman,*Asst. U. S. Atty., for plaintiff.

*A. Blythe,*for defendant.

Simonton, J.,

*(charging the jury.)*The defendant is indicted for carrying on the business of a retail liquor dealer, and not having paid the special tax. Some witnesses swear to purchases of whisky fronl defendant at various times. ' You are to decide whether they are credible witnesses. If you believe them, this will form your verdict. But the defendant, testifying in his own behalf, gives this account of the matter: He says that he and two other persons were the owners of a licensed distillery, near the North Carolina line, in this state; that they also had paid the special tax for retailing liquor at the distillery; that they received, in due course of business, orders for whisky, and, filling these orders, they sent their wagon, containing whisky in barrels, to different parts of the state, 20, 30, and 50 miles from their distillery; that all the liquor which he delivered' had been ordered in this way. When defendant was arrested he was in charge of a wagon in which were three barrels,—two full of whisky, and one nearly empty. I am requested to charge you, on this point. If parties dealing in liquor, who have paid the special tax, receive orders for whisky at their place of business, and fill the orders so that the sale is consummated at their place of business,—so consummated that the property in the liquor passes to the purchaser,— this is no violation of the law, although they may sell and may send the liquor to parties residing at a distance.

If, however, they receive orders from persons at a distance, and in consequence of such orders they send out whisky in barrels, and, going through the country, they draw from the barrels, and deliver in small quantities,—say a pint, quart, or gallon,—to parties who pay them on receipt of the liquor, this is a violation of the law; the property in the whisky in the barrels remains in the sellers until it is delivered to the purchaser. The sale is consummated upon the delivery of the whisky, and it is not protected by the tax paid for sales at the distillery.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 10.09
                                                                   -------------
                                AMENDMENT NO. 1

                                     TO THE

                               DAVOX CORPORATION

                                1996 STOCK PLAN


     Pursuant to action taken by the Board of Directors of Davox Corporation
(the "Corporation"), the Corporation's 1996 Stock Plan (the "Plan") is amended
by:

1.  Amending and restating Section 6(A) thereof so that said Section 6(A) shall
read in its entirety as follows:

"A.  PRICE FOR NON-QUALIFIED OPTIONS, AWARDS AND PURCHASES.  Subject to
     ------------------------------------------------------            
Paragraph 2D (relating to compliance with Section 162(m) of the Code), the
exercise price per share specified in the agreement relating to each Non-
Qualified Option granted, and the purchase price per share of stock granted in
any Award or authorized as a Purchase, under the Plan may be less than the fair
market value of the Common Stock of the Company on the date of grant, provided
that (i) in no event shall such exercise price or such purchase price be less
than the minimum legal consideration required therefor under the laws of any
jurisdiction in which the Company or its successors in interest may be
organized, (ii) options representing the right to purchase in the aggregate a
maximum of ten percent (10%) of the number of shares authorized under the Plan
(as set forth in Section 4 hereof) may be granted with exercise prices below
fair market value, and (iii) no option may be granted with an exercise price of
less than eighty-five percent (85%) of fair market value.  The Committee may, in
its discretion, subject any Stock Right granted under the Plan to any terms or
conditions necessary for compensation recognized in connection with the exercise
of such Stock Right or the disposition of Common Stock acquired pursuant to such
Stock Right, to constitute qualified performance-based compensation under
Section 162(m) of the Code and applicable regulations promulgated thereunder."

and

2.  Amending Section 4 thereof to increase the Plan Share Limit so that the
aggregate number of shares which may be issued pursuant to the Plan is increased
by 450,000 shares, from 900,000 shares to 1,350,000 shares.*

Except as modified hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

----------------------
*  Share numbers have been adjusted to reflect a 3-for-2 stock split effected as
a stock dividend on May 28, 1997.
#### John Kossifos, Respondent, v Harry I. Katz, P.C., et al., Appellants.

[821 NYS2d 467]

In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the *592defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Jamieson, J.), entered September 29, 2005, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants represented the plaintiffs decedent, Melanie Kossifos, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries she sustained when a Liberty Lines bus ran over her leg. The defendants never filed a notice of claim with the County of Westchester, nor moved for permission to file a late notice of claim. After the action was dismissed for failure to comply with this condition precedent *(see Kossifos v Liberty Lines Tr.,*277 AD2d 205 [2000]), the plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for legal malpractice against the defendants. The Supreme Court denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, finding that there were issues of fact as to whether the defendants were negligent, and as to whether the bus driver was negligent in the underlying action.

In order to prevail on a claim to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must show (1) that the attorney failed to exercise that degree of care, skill, and diligence commonly possessed by a member of the legal community, (2) that the attorney’s negligence was a proximate cause of the loss -sustained, (3) that the plaintiff incurred damages as a direct result of the attorney’s actions, and (4) that the plaintiff would have been successful if the attorney had exercised due care *(see Turner v Robins,*267 AD2d 376 [1999]; *McCoy v Tepper,*261 AD2d 592 [1999]; *Iannarone v Gramer,*256 AD2d 443 [1998]). At the time that the defendants undertook to represent the plaintiff’s decedent in the personal injury action, the law was well settled that, with respect to accidents arising out of the circumstances of this case, the timely filing of a notice of claim with the County of Westchester was a condition precedent to any litigation *(see Coleman v Westchester St. Transp. Co.,*57 NY2d 734 [1982]; *Singer v Liberty Lines,*183 AD2d 820 [1992]; *McSpedon v Liberty Lines,*109 AD2d 731 [1985]; *James v Liberty Lines,*97 AD2d 749 [1983]). Moreover, triable issues of fact exist as to whether the bus driver failed to see what, with the proper use of his senses, he should have seen *(see Gonzalez v County of Suffolk,*277 AD2d 350 [2000]; *see also Sappleton v Metropolitan Suburban Bus Auth.,*140 AD2d 684 [1988]; *Pedersen v Balzan,*117 AD2d 933 [1986]; *McAlister v Schwartz,*105 AD2d 731 [1984]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defen*593dants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Schmidt, J.E, Santucci, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.