alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Archon Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the
Company), on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Paul W. Lowden, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Armando Toral, Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:



| |  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                             |  |                  
|-------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|Dated:                                       |  | February 13, 2007
|                                            
|/s/ Paul W. Lowden                          
|Paul W. Lowden                              
|Chairman of the Board and President         
|(Principal Executive Officer)               
|                                            
|/s/ Armando Toral                           
|Armando Toral                               
|Principal Accounting Officer                
|(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-64,718] 

In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on December 17, 2008 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of TAC Automotive, Flint Michigan. 

The petitioners are included in amended certifications issued for on-site leased workers of TAC Automotive at Delphi Corporation, Dayton, Ohio, under petition numbers TA-W-62,273, TA-W-62,273A and TA-W-62,273B. 

Consequently further investigation would serve no purpose and the petition investigation is terminated. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 13th day of January 2009. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E9-1497 Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO****RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT**

I, Peter G. Schoonmaker, certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Gas Resources,Inc.;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

# Date: May 30, 2007

|        |   | /s/ Peter  G. Schoonmaker             |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Peter G. Schoonmaker                  |   |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

 

----
S05F0825.

#### BLUE v. BLUE.

(615 SE2d 540)

Thompson, Justice.

We granted wife’s application for a discretionary appeal pursuant to this Court’s pilot project in domestic cases. Because wife cannot demonstrate error, we affirm.

Husband sued wife for divorce. At the commencement of the final hearing, the parties announced that they reached a settlement with regard to the marital residence and the division of personal property. Thereupon, the court heard evidence and argument of counsel on the remaining issues of custody, visitation, child support, alimony and attorney fees. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court awarded joint legal custody of the children to the parties and set forth a visitation schedule. The court declined to award child support to either party in light of the j oint custody arrangement and the fact that the wife “has income potential roughly equivalent to [husband’s].” It also declined to award alimony, and it ordered each party to bear his or her own attorney fees. Wife filed a motion for new trial, a motion to set aside judgment, and a motion to enforce agreement, in which she asserted that, prior to the final hearing, the parties announced that they entered into a settlement agreement as to *all issues,*except transportation of the children for visitation purposes. The trial court denied the motions, observing that they were not supported by the facts “as reflected by the trial court’s notes and specific reflections of the events which took place in court.” This discretionary appeal followed.

1. Wife asserts the trial court erred in finding that her earning capacity is approximately equal to husband’s. However, the final hearing was not transcribed and, in the absence of a transcript of the evidence, we must presume that the evidence supports the judge’s findings. *Leitzke v. Leitzke,*239 Ga. 17 (235 SE2d 500) (1977). “Unless some authorized means is used to bring the evidence to this court on appeal, we cannot determine whether enumerations of error, which require consideration of the evidence, have any merit or not.” (Punctuation omitted.) Id. at 18.

*551Decided June 30, 2005.

*Carlisle, Wren & McClurg, Dale A. Wren,*for appellant.

*Harry H. Harkins, Jr.,*for appellee.

2. Likewise, in view of the lack of a transcript, we cannot consider wife’s contention that the parties reached a settlement which was announced in court and which should have been enforced. See Division 1.

3. Wife’s assertion that she was unable to have the hearing transcribed because the trial court erroneously “released” the court reporter is without merit. The burden was on wife, as the appellant, to ensure that the proceedings were transcribed and that a transcript was prepared. *Graham v. Haley,*224 Ga. 498, 500 (162 SE2d 346) (1968). See also OCGA § 5-6-41 (c).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### McCarthy v. Lerner Stores Corporation.

No. 3112 — 47.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

Feb. 23, 1949.

Sheldon E. Bernstein and -David G. Bress, both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

H. Mason Welch, of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., which relates to pretrial, provides that the Court shall make an order which recites the action taken at the pretrial hearing. This order when entered controls the subsequent course of the action, unless modified at the trial to prevent manifest injuries.

One of the chief purposes of pretrial procedure, and the principal usefulness of a pretrial order, is to formulate the issues to be litigated at the trial. The parties are bound by the pretrial order. They may not later inject an issue not raised at the pretrial conference. Otherwise the primary objective of pretrial procedure would be defeated.

It is assumed by the Court that at the pretrial counsel are as thoroughly familiar with the case — making as complete a disclosure as they would at the trial, and being as completely prepared — as they will be at the trial. This is an unavoidable and inexorable duty that the existing Federal practice imposes on members of the bar. To say that parties are not bound by the pretrial order is a misunderstanding of the purpose and the office of pretrial.

No doubt situations may occasionally arise in which counsel discovers some vital new matter, after pretrial and before the trial. The pretrial order may then be amended to include the new issue. Application may be made to the Pretrial Court to amend the pretrial order.

If counsel waits until the trial, he is bound by the pretrial order, unless the trial court relieves him of the pretrial order to prevent manifest injustice. Of course, it is contemplated that this will be done only in exceptional cases, as otherwise the adverse party may be taken by surprise and in a proper case may become entitled to a continuance and possibly a mistrial, if the case is tried before a jury.

It is the Court’s view that if counsel desires to inject an issue not raised at pretrial, application should be made to amend the pretrial order and to include that issue in the pretrial order.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (No. 33-55131) and Forms S-8 (No. 333-28101 and 333-28065) of Sterling
Financial Corporation and in the related prospectuses of our report dated
January 22, 2002 (except Note 26 as to which the date is February 28, 2002),
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Sterling Financial
Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2001.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 26, 2002
Exhibit 10.1 for Royal Finance Inc Form S-8



EXHIBIT 10.1
                                     FORM OF

                        MINUTES OF SPECIAL BOARD MEETING
                               ROYAL FINANCE, INC.
                                NOVEMBER 14, 2001

A meeting of the Board of Directors being called, and in attendance the
following:

         Douglas Meyers, Chairman
         Martin Bolodian, President
         Leon Wilde, CFO
         Lisa Wilde, Secretary


Constituting a quorum: the meeting was called to order at 1:45 PM EST, and the
following issue of business was presented and acted upon:

MOTION: To authorize the board to issue S-8 to the following individuals:

Douglas Meyers, 10,000 Shares

Martin Bolodian, 10,000 Shares

Lisa Wilde, 10,000 Shares

Leon P. Wilde, 10,000 Shares

Lydia O. Salas, 4,500 Shares

Richard P. Greene, 10,000 Shares


VOTE: MOTION ACCEPTED UNANIMOUSLY

The meeting was then adjourned upon unanimous motion with no further business.

By: /s/ Douglas Meyers                      By: /s/ Lisa Wilde
---------------------------                 --------------------------
   Douglas Meyers, CEO                         Lisa Wilde, Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 126 (Thursday, July 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31745-31746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15653]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[F-21901-98; AK-964-1410-KC-P]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 
an appealable decision approving the surface and subsurface estates in 
certain lands for conveyance pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims 
Settlement Act will be issued to Doyon, Limited. The lands are in the 
vicinity of Huslia, Alaska, and are located in:

Kateel River Meridian, Alaska

T. 9 N., R. 14 E.,
    Secs. 1 to 36, inclusive.

    Containing approximately 22,585 acres.
    Aggregating approximately 22,585 acres.

    Notice of the decision will also be published four times in the 
Fairbanks Daily News-Miner.

DATES: The time limits for filing an appeal are:
    1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely 
affected by the decision shall have until August 3, 2009 to file an 
appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.
    Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the 
requirements of 43 CFR part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have 
waived their rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, <greek-i>13, 
Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Bureau of Land Management by phone

[[Page 31746]]

at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ccada7e2aea0a1e2afa3a2baa9b5ada2afa98cada7e2aea0a1e2aba3ba"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="06676d28646a6b2865696870637f6768656346676d28646a6b28616970">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons 
who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, 
seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.

Jason Robinson,
Land Law Examiner, Land Transfer Adjudication I.
[FR Doc. E9-15653 Filed 7-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Corrado De Gasperis, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Novamerican Steel Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the condensed consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s registered public accounting firm and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: April 7, 2008

 

 

| /s/ Corrado De Gasperis         |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| *Corrado De Gasperis*           |   |
| *(Principal Financial Officer)* |   |
# covid_table56_c63_state
**Exhibit 31.1**

**MANAGEMENTCERTIFICATION**

I, Philip O.Nolan, certify that: 

1.                  I have reviewedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stanley, Inc.;

2.                  Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                  Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                  The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)                Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)               Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                  The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)                All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)               Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|                       |   | /s/ PHILIP O. NOLAN                             |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                  |   | Philip O. Nolan                                 |
| Date: August 9,  2007 |   | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----