alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF M. H., A CHILD,

 

 Appellant. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00191-CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2014DCM1307)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s first motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until August 10, 2015. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Celia Villasenor, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 10, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of July, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
@article{110946,
  author = {Keana Scott and Nicholas Ritchie},
  title = {Analysis of 3D elemental mapping artifacts in biological specimens using Monte Carlo simulation},
  year = {2009},
  number = {233, Part 2},
  month = {2009-01-29},
  publisher = {Journal of Microscopy-Oxford},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=832267},
  language = {en},
}
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  ONLINE  ORIGINALS,  INC.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  February 28, 2009,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Shari Sookarookoff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (a)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date:    April 17, 2009


By:      /s/ Shari Sookarookoff
         ---------------------------------
         Shari Sookarookoff
         Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer
# table2_q1_state
@conference{1207246,
  author = {Joy Shen and Abdullah Weiss and Anil Gurgen and Idan Baroukh},
  title = {A Turbulence Model Sensitivity Analysis of Thermal-Hydraulic Properties on The Pre-Conceptual NIST Neutron Source Design},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-05-26 04:05:00},
  publisher = {International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE), Kyoto, JP},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936086},
  language = {en},
}
H. Res. 938 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 23, 2020. 

Resolved, That House Resolution 935 is hereby adopted. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Affinion Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Todd H. Siegel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: October 29, 2010



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Todd H. Siegel                                  
|Todd H. Siegel                                      
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12

- 40930 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ALEJANDRO HERNANDEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:10

- CR

- 511

- 1

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alejandro
Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this o pinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 17, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 12-40930 Document: 00512473054 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013No. 12

- 40930

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 12-40930 Document: 00512473054 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 A0 54 8

. CURTI S F A R M ER v. GEORGI A DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVI C ES, EX REL. J AYLEN FARMER.

On Ap ri l 1 2
, 2 01 6
, Cu rt i s Farm er fi l ed h is n o t i ce o f ap p eal referen ci n g a t ri al

co u rt ju d g m en t en t ered o n N o v em b er 3
, 2 01 0

. Farm er t h en fi l ed an am en d ed n o t i ce

o f ap p eal referen ci n g a t ri al co u rt ju d g m en t en t ered o n M ay 9 , 2 0 16

. Ho wev er, t h e

reco rd d o es n o t in cl u d e ju d g m e n t s e n t ered o n ei th er o f th o s e d ay s

. Gi v en t h e
ap p aren t ab s en ce o f a t ri al co urt o rd er, we h av e n o t h in g t o rev iew. See Ami ca v. S t a t e , 3 0 7 Ga. Ap p

. 2 7 6 , 2 8 2 (2 ) (7 0 4 SE2 d 8 3 1 ) (2 0 10 ).
Th e o n l y o rd er i n t h e reco rd i s an ord er fo r p at ern it y an d ch il d s u p p o rt en t ered

o n M arch 1 2
, 2 0 1 6. B e c a u se t h at o rd er in v o l v es ch i l d s u p po rt , i t i s a d o m es t i c rel at i o n s m at t er wi t h i n t h e m ean i n g o f OCGA § 5-6 -3 5 (a) (2 ). See Co ll in s v. Da vi s , 3 1 8 Ga. Ap p

. 26 5
, 2 6 6 ( 1 ) (7 3 3 SE2 d 7 9 8 ) (2 0 1 2 ); Bo o ker v. Ga

. D ep t

. o f Hu ma n Res o u r ces , 3 1 7 G a. Ap p

. 4 2 6 (7 3 1 SE2 d 1 10 ) (2 0 1 2 ). A p p eal s i n su ch m at t ers m u s t
b e t ak en b y ap p l icat i o n fo r d is cret i o n ary ap p eal

. 1 See Bo o ker
, s u p ra. Farm er’ s fai l u re

t o fo ll o w t h e ap pro p ri at e ap p el l at e p ro ced u re d ep ri v es u s o f j u ri s d i ct i o n t o co n s i d er

an ap peal fro m

t h at o rd er. Id

. Fo r t h es e reas on s , Farm er’ s ap p eal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

1 On Oct o b er 2 4
, 2 01 6, Farm er fi l ed an u n t i m el y ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary

rev i ew o f t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s M arch 1 2
, 2 0 1 6 o r d e r, wh ich th i s Co u rt d i s m i s sed

. See Cas e No . A1 7D0 1 4 6 (d eci d ed No v em b er 1 0 , 2 0 1 6 ). November 30, 2016C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 11/30/2016
#### The State ex rel. Wainer, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Wainer v. Indus. Comm.,*Ill Ohio St.3d 263, 2006-Ohio-5701.]

(No. 2006-0005

Submitted September 19, 2006

Decided November 15, 2006.)

Livorno & Arnett Co., L.P.A., and John F. Livorno, for appellant.

Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Charissa D. Payer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Resnick, Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
[891 NYS2d 220]

#### In the Matter of Leah Uri Winn-Ritzenberg, for Leave to Change His/Her Name To Olin Yuri Winn-Ritzenberg, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

October 21, 2009

*2APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Brenna K. DeVaney, Benjamin P. Edwards, Daniel M. Gonen*and *Janson Mao,*and *Transgender Legal Defense & Education Fund,*New York City *(Michael D. Silverman*and *M. Dru Levasseur*of counsel), for appellant. *Elizabeth Cooper, Suzanne B. Goldberg, Zachary A. Kramer, Sylvia A. Law*and *Dean Spade,*and *Debevoise & Plimpton LLP,*New York City *(Maeve O’Connor*and *Andrew Gilden*of counsel), and *Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund,*New York City *(Hayley Gorenberg*and *Cole Thaler*of counsel), amici curiae.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Appeal from order, dated February 27, 2009, deemed an application by petitioner for review pursuant to CPLR 5704 (b) *(see Matter of Washington,*216 AD2d 781 [1995]), and so considered, order reversed, without costs, and the matter remitted to Civil Court for entry of an order granting the petition consistent herewith.

We exercise our discretion under CPLR 5704 (b) and grant the transgendered petitioner’s application for a name change corresponding with petitioner’s male gender identity. The record shows that petitioner satisfied the requirements for a name change under section 61 of the Civil Rights Law by specifying the grounds for the application and disclosing pertinent background information *(see Matter of Golden,*56 AD3d 1109*3[2008]). In the absence of evidence of fraud, misrepresentation, or interference with the rights of others, the name change petition should have been granted *(see Matter of Halligan,*46 AD2d 170, 171-172 [1974]). There is no sound basis in law or policy to engraft upon the statutory provisions an additional requirement that a transgendered petitioner present medical substantiation for the desired name change. “Apart from the prevention of fraud or interference with the rights of others, there is no reason — and no legal basis — for courts to appoint themselves the guardians of orthodoxy in such matters” *(Matter of Guido,*1 Misc 3d 825, 828 [2003]). In granting petitioner’s application, we do not address the separate issue of whether petitioner has changed gender for legal purposes *(see Matter of Golden,*56 AD3d at 1111; *see also Matter of Anonymous,*64 Misc 2d 309, 310 [1970]).

McKeon, EJ., Schoenfeld and Shulman, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, Jackie L. Reed, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FGBC Bancshares, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designated such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) [Omitted];     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: May 11, 2007                 /s/ Jackie L. Reed Jackie L. Reed     President and CEO
Exhibit 10.1

                                    TAK 2000                    Aldrich Lane
                                                                Laurel, NY 11948
                    ----------------------------------------    631-298-9509

                                Theresa A. Kober




         Pursuant to negotiations between Adzone Research heretofore referred to
as "the  company"  and  Theresa A.  Kober,  heretofore  now  referred  to as the
subcontractor; the following contract for engagement shall be entered into:

         The company agrees to pay the sum of $18,000.00 for services related to
the pursuit and negotiations with the United States Government and/or and United
States  Government  Agency or department acting on their part and allowed by law
for the  company's  product.  Inasmuch  as the  company is  currently  unable to
provide a currency  exchange it is therefore agreed to that company stock in the
amount of 300,000 shares will be issued immediately to the subcontractor.

         It is also agreed to that the company will register  these shares under
rule S-8 to  compensate  for the  additional  market  risk  associated  with the
subcontractor accepting stock in lieu of cash.

         The  subcontractor  agrees,  for the above  noted fee,  to provide  all
Contract  Negotiations,  Marketing Support, Bid Process Support and training for
all  paperwork  associated  with delivery of product and proper  procedures  for
billing and receiving of payment form the Government.

         The subcontractor  agrees to provide this service for not less than 180
hrs. but not to exeed one (1) year from the date of this contract.

         All expenses including but not limited to travel,  entertainment,  etc.
are to be borne by the company.


                       Agreed to this date 26 October 2001


/s/ CHARLES CARDONA                                         /s/ THERESA A. KOBER
---------------------------                                 --------------------
Charles Cardona                                             Theresa A. Kober
President, Adzone Research                                  Contract Manager
Administrative Offices Civil and Family Division Criminal Division Jury Office

(512) 854-9457 (512) 854-9457 (512) 854-9420 (512) 854-9669

fax: 854-4744 fax: 854-9549 fax: 854-4566 fax: 854-4457

Velva L. Price

Travis County District Clerk

Travis County Courthouse Complex

P.O. Box 679003

Austin, Texas 78767-9003

July 27, 2015

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle

Third Court of Appeals

P.O. Box 12547

Austin, Texas 78711-2547

Dear Mr. Kyle,

A clerk’s record in cause number, D-1-GN-10-000772 and Court of Appeals number 

03-15-00446-CV, styled, BAXTER OIL SERVICES, LTD V. TEXAS COMMISSION ON 

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, is due in your office today, July 27, 2015. Due to the size of the 

clerk’s record, it is necessary to split the record into two (2) volumes and hand number the second 

volume. Therefore, I am requesting an extension for filing the clerk’s record by August 4, 2015.

Thank you for your consideration.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (512) 854-4309

Sincerely,

Trish Winkler

Deputy Court Clerk II

(512) 854-4309
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Atlantis Plastics, Inc (the Company)
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony F. Bova, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Anthony F. BovaANTHONY F. BOVAPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2005
 Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Atlantis Plastics, Inc (the Company)
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Saari, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (3)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(4)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Paul G. SaariPAUL G. SAARISenior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 30, 2005
EXHIBIT 21.1


REGISTRANTS'S SUBSIDIARIES -- ALL 100% OWNED

ATLANTIS PLASTIC FILMS, INC., a Delaware corporation
ATLANTIS MOLDED PLASTICS, INC., a Florida corporation
ATLANTIS PLASTIC INJECTION MOLDING, INC., a Kentucky corporation
PIERCE PLASTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation
PLASTIC CONTAINERS, INC.,  an Alabama corporation
RIGAL PLASTICS, INC., a Florida corporation 
WP ACQUISITION CORP., a California corporation
ATLANTIS PLASTICS FOREIGN SALES INC., a Barbados corporation
LINEAR FILMS, INC., a Canadian corporation
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Susser Holdings Corporation (the Company) for the three months ended June 28,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mary E. Sullivan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 7, 2009



/s/ Mary E. SullivanMary E. SullivanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# table4_q2_naics
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESUS LIRA-HUERTA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-72231

Agency No. A090-851-640

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 21, 2015** 

Before: CANBY, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Jesus Lira-Huerta, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

FILED

JUL 27 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo questions of law. Iturribarria v.

INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003). We deny in part and dismiss in part the

petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen as

untimely where Lira-Huerta filed it more than 11 years after his final order of

removal, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i), and failed to establish that he warranted

equitable tolling of the filing deadline, see Avagyan v. Holder, 646 F.3d 672, 679

(9th Cir. 2011).

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to reopen proceedings

sua sponte. See Go v. Holder, 744 F.3d 604, 609-10 (9th Cir. 2014).

Contrary to Lira-Huerta’s contention, the BIA sufficiently articulated its

reasons for denial. See Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 2010).

Because these determinations are dispositive, we need not reach LiraHuerta’s underlying contentions regarding his convictions.

Finally, we deny the government’s motion for judicial notice of documents

outside the administrative record. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(A); Lising v. INS, 124

F.3d 996, 998 (9th Cir. 1997) (explaining standard for review of out-of-record

evidence).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

2 13-72231
# table189_q19.1_size
# Result 2.1