alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Westway Group, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ James B. JenkinsName:

James B. JenkinsTitle:

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Director


Dated: November 9, 2010
Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Boyd E. Hoback, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of Good Times Restaurants Inc.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;

 

4.     The registrant's other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant'sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financialreporting.

 

5.     The registrant's other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant'sauditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)     All significant deficiencies inthe design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal controls over financial reporting.

 

 

 

*/s/ Boyd E. Hoback*

Boyd E. Hoback

*President and ChiefExecutive Officer*

May 14, 2008

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-70,678]

Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on May 28, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Quality Metal Coatings, Inc., Saint Mary's, Pennsylvania.

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition (TA-W-70,639) filed on May 27, 2009 that is the subject of an ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of June 2009.

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-15758 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
t*0(o-\$

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA# 01-13-00494-CR OFFENSE: 21.1 (Sex Assault of Child)

Ayunwi Meme Fuh v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Harris

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 230th District Court

DATE: 04/09/2015 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 1354773

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Ayunwi Meme Fuh v. The State of

STYLE: Texas. CCA# ^Ok^/jT

PRO 5E Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

tteFuteh. JUDGE:

DATE: 06/^yl/r SIGNED: PC:

JUDGE: /,M LUA^ifc--^ PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
Exhibit 32.2
      -
      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




The
      undersigned, Donald L. Sytsma, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Georgia
      Exploration, Inc. hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      the
      quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Georgia Exploration, Inc. for the period
      ended November 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
      of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Georgia Exploration, Inc.






Dated:
      January 22, 2007


/
                s
                / Donald L. SytsmaDonald
                L. SytsmaPrincipal
                Accounting Officer
IV 

House Calendar No. 77 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 938 

[Report No. 116–419] 

Providing for the adoption of the resolution (H.Res. 935) establishing a 

Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis as a select investigative 

subcommittee of the Committee on Oversight and Reform. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2020 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for the adoption of the resolution (H.Res. 935) 

establishing a Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus 

Crisis as a select investigative subcommittee of the Committee on Oversight and Reform. 

1 Resolved, That House Resolution 935 is hereby 

2 adopted. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 77 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 938 

[Report No. 116–419] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for the adoption of the resolution (H.Res. 

Reform. committee of the Committee on Oversight and Coronavirus Crisis as a select investigative sub935) establishing a Select Subcommittee on the 

APRIL 23, 2020 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### HECHT, LEVIS & KAHN, Inc., v. NEW ZEALAND INS. CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Dec. 28, 1940.

*594Hill, Rivkins & Middleton, of New York City (Gregory S. Rivkins and William M. Sheffeld, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Horace T. Atkins, of New York City, for defendant.

LEIBELL, District Judge.

This is an action for damages for breach of a contract of insurance covering a shipment of crude rubber from Singapore to New York. A jury trial was originally demanded by plaintiff. On October 31, 1940, the parties entered into a written stipulation which provided in part: “11. The plaintiff’s demand for a trial by jury may be deemed withdrawn, and it is stipulated that the case may be tried before the Court alone with the same force and effect as if tried before a jury.”

At the end of the trial before me on December 16th both sides waived the necessity of findings. On December 17th I directed a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $4,-136.61, which included interest to that date. Later, and before the entry of any judgment, the attorney for the defendant requested that I make findings in view of the provisions of Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, which reads in part as follows: “Rule 52(a) In all actions tried upon the facts without a jury, the court shall find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law thereon and direct the entry of the appropriate judgment; ;}« Jje * *»*

This rule was adopted from former Equity Rule 70%, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723. The distinction made under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is between jury and non jury actions, not actions at law and suits in equity, as formerly. Findings were mandatory under former Equity Rule 70%. Interstate Circuit v. United States, 304 U.S. 55, 58 S.Ct. 768, 82 L.Ed. 1146. The language of Rule 52(a) is also mandatory. Defendant intends to appeal the verdict and I feel that it is my duty to resolve any doubt as to the necessity of findings, in favor of a complete record on appeal, so as not to prejudice defendant’s right to a proper review in the appellate court. I have concluded that findings of fact and conclusions of law should be made, before any judgment is entered herein.

Counsel will exchange their respective proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law on January 10, 1941, and will file their respective proposed findings, with a memorandum criticising those submitted by their opponent, together with a memorandum in support of their respective conclusions of law on January 17, 1941. After I have made and filed my findings of fact and conclusions of law, an appropriate form of judgment should be submitted to the Clerk of the Court on notice.
# covid_table7_q3_naics
# table108_q13.1_size
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 123 (Monday, June 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15376]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:40 a.m. on 
Tuesday, June 23, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters related 
to the Corporation's corporate, supervisory, and resolution activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice 
Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, seconded by Director John E. Bowman 
(Acting Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), concurred in by 
Director John C. Dugan (Comptroller of the Currency), Director Thomas 
J. Curry (Appointive), and Chairman Sheila C. Bair, that Corporation 
business required its consideration of the matters which were to be the 
subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; 
that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public 
interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open 
to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a 
closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), 
(c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10) of the ``Government in 
the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), 
(c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

    Dated: June 23, 2009.
    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-15376 Filed 6-25-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### Stephen Sicilia, Plaintiff, v City of New York et al., Respondents, and JB Electric LLC, Appellant. (And Third-Party Actions.)

Submitted January 7, 2013;

decided February 12, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Judge Rivera taking no part.
# table173_q16.7_state
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

C.S., 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

J. & B.S. AND J.S. AND HON. J.A.S., 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 35 WM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2015, the Application for Exercise of King’s 

Bench Power or Extraordinary Jurisdiction is DENIED.
RCM 1.4

RCM 1.4 Supplemental Annuities Revised February 12, 2014 Page 1 of 1

1.4.1 Supplemental Annuity Procedure

Supplemental annuity procedure is in FOM1 315.

Appendices

Appendix A - Employer Pension Table

The Employer Pension Table is in FOM1 Art.3 App. A.

Appendix B – Employer Pension and Interest Factors 

In the past, pension factors were programmed into the G-88p and SUP Annuity 

Calculations Program in Microsoft Access. The factors were used to compute the 

amount of an employer pension that is based whole or in part on employee 

contributions. However, due to the lack of its use and the resources required to 

annually update the program, this program has been obsoleted.

Appendix C - Explanation Of Closing Date For Employees Born 

Before September 2, 1916

See FOM1 Art. 3 App. B.

Appendix D - Supplemental Annuity Rates

See FOM1 Art. 3 App. D.

Appendix E – Supplemental Annuity Legislative History

See FOM1 Art. 3 App. E.

Appendix F - SAMIC And SAARA Programs

The SAMIC and SAARA programs are obsolete.

Appendix G – TACAL Historical Information

See FOM1 Art. 3 App. E.
# table181_q17.1_naics
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000137

23-JUL-2015

09:36 AM
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0456. JANETTE BOWEN v. COLFIN AI-GA I, LLC.

This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following

an adverse ruling, defendant Janette Bowen appealed to the superior court. On May

15, 2015, the superior court dismissed Bowen’s appeal and directed entry of a writ

of possession in favor of Colfin AI-GA 1, LLC. On June 15, 2015, Bowen filed an

application for discretionary appeal in this Court. We lack jurisdiction.

Generally, an application for discretionary appeal may be filed within 30 days

of entry of the order sought to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). However, the

underlying subject matter of an appeal controls over the relief sought in determining

the proper appellate procedure. See Rebich v. Miles, 264 Ga. 467, 467-468 (448 SE2d

192) (1994). The underlying subject matter here is a dispossessory judgment. 

Pursuant to OCGA § 44-7-56, an appeal from a dispossessory judgment must be filed

within seven days of the date the judgment was entered. See Ray M. Wright, Inc. v.

Jones, 239 Ga. App. 521 (521 SE2d 456) (1999). Because Bowen did not file her

application for discretionary appeal within this time period, it is untimely.

Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review this application, which is hereby

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/08/2015

July 08, 2015
# table156_q16.1_size
NY REGIONAL RAIL CORPORATION
                                 4302 FIRST AVE.
                               BROOKLYN, NY 11232
                       (718) 788-3690                         FAX (718) 788-4462

                                                         PROMISSORY NOTE 9803

                                     2/20/98

         FOR THE VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of
Hi-TEL GROUP the sum of one hundred thousand ($100,000) United States of America
Dollars.

         The Note amount shall be paid to Note Holder in a single payment,
including an accrued interest due, of one hundred thousand ($100,000) on or
before December 31, 1998. Interest will be Ten percent (10%) per annum.

         In addition, the maker provides to the Note holder, listed above, the
IRREVOCABLE right to convert this Note into Common Shares of NEW YORK REGIONAL
RAIL CORPORATION, as said Common Shares are available under the provisions of
the non-public offering exemption as provided in the U.S. Securities Act of 1933
(and Regulation D thereunder) for as long as this Note, remains open. The
conversion rights granted to the Note Holder will be at nine cents per share and
will be calculated based on the value of the Note divided nine cents. The
conversion rights represented by this Note are exercisable at the option of the
Note Holder at any time within the period above specified.

         Upon exercise of Note 9803 conversion to Common shares the maker grants
Note Holder an option to acquire a block of 550,000 shares of non restricted
Common Stock for fifteen cents ($.15) per share. Said option will be exercisable
until June 30, 1999.

         Maker warrants that Common shares provided to Note Holder on conversion
of Note or any other Common shares issued to Holder as result of provisions of
this Note will be issued with out restrictions.

      To receive a certificate for the Common shares when the Note is converted,
the Note will be presented and surrendered to the Corporation, with the
accompanying form of subscription duly executed. A conversion subscription form
is provided as an attachment to this Note.

        In the event of default, the undersigned agrees to pay all reasonable
attorney fees and costs of collection.

New York Regional Rail Corporation
By:____________________
President
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00211-CV 

IN RE ALLEN F. CALTON RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

TRIAL COURT NO. 96-272790-14

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: SUDDERTH, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: July 16, 2015

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
Exhibit 31.01
                                                                 -------------


                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Gary D. Halbert, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of ProFutures Diversified Fund,
L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
      including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
      within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
      report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
      the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
      reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
      record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting.



Date:  March 30, 2005



/s/ Gary D. Halbert

-------------------------------

Gary D. Halbert, President
ProFutures, Inc., General Partner
97-332.

#### Green v. Cumberland.

Highland App. No. 95CA893. Reported at 78 Ohio St.3d 1457, 677 N.E.2d 816. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Darrin Duane Ervin

, * From the 3 9th District Court

of Haskell County,

Trial Court No. 6937

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 228

- CR * June 17 , 20 2 1

The State of Texas

, * Memorand um Opinion by Trotter , J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
# table163_q16.4_naics