alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                 Exhibit 10.2

                                                                 Execution Copy

                                   ASSIGNMENT

     For value received, in accordance with the Purchase Agreement (the
"Purchase Agreement") dated as of December 1, 2001, between the undersigned and
Franklin Receivables LLC (the "Purchaser"), the undersigned does hereby sell,
assign, transfer and otherwise convey unto the Purchaser, without recourse, all
right, title and interest of the undersigned in and to (i) the Receivables, and
all monies representing interest and principal payments received thereon on and
after the Cutoff Date; (ii) the security interest of the Seller in the Financed
Vehicles granted by the Obligors pursuant thereto and any other interest of the
Seller in such Financed Vehicles; (iii) the interest of the Seller in any
proceeds with respect to the Receivables from claims on any physical damage,
credit life or disability insurance policies relating to the Financed Vehicles
or Obligors and any proceeds from the liquidation of the Receivables; (iv) the
interest of the Seller in any proceeds from any Receivables repurchased by a
Dealer pursuant to a Dealer Agreement as a result of a breach of a
representation or warranty in the related Dealer Agreement; (v) all rights under
any extended warranty service contracts on the related Financed Vehicles; (vi)
the related Receivables Files; and (vii) the proceeds of any and all of the
foregoing. The foregoing sale does not constitute and is not intended to result
in any assumption by the Purchaser of any obligation of the undersigned to the
Obligors, insurers or any other person in connection with the Receivables,
Receivable Files, any insurance policies or any agreement or instrument relating
to any of them.

     This Assignment is made pursuant to and upon the representations,
warranties and agreements on the part of the undersigned contained in the
Purchase Agreement and is to be governed by the Purchase Agreement. The
undersigned acknowledges and agrees that the Purchaser may further assign the
items enumerated in clauses (i) through (vii) above to Franklin

<PAGE>

Auto Trust 2001-2 which may in turn assign its interests in the items in (i)
through (vii) to The Bank of New York, as trustee (the "Trustee") for the
benefit of the Noteholders and the Security Insurer and that the Trustee will
have the right to enforce any of the rights of the Purchaser under the Purchase
Agreement.

     Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the
meaning assigned to them in the Purchase Agreement.

<PAGE>


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Assignment to be duly
executed as of December 1, 2001.



                                  FRANKLIN CAPITAL CORPORATION



                                  By: /s/ Harold Miller
                                      ------------------------------------
                                      Name: Harold E. Miller, Jr.
                                      Title: President and CEO
#### Sandra A. Lamont, Appellant, v Lane Bryant, Inc., Doing Business as Lane Bryant Stores, et al., Respondents, and E.C. Provini Co., Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Limited Stores Planning, Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants; Charming Shoppes, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 893]

In a consolidated action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated March 7, 2005, which granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Lane Bryant, Inc., doing business as Lane Bryant Stores, and the third-party defendant Charming Shoppes, Inc., which was for summary judgment dismissing the action insofar as asserted against the defendant Lane Bryant, Inc., doing business as Lane Bryant Stores, and the defendant third-party plaintiff, granted that branch of the separate motion of the defendant third-party plaintiff which was for summary judgment dismissing the action insofar as asserted against it, and granted that branch of the separate motion of the defendant Abbot & Abbot Architects, PLL, which was for summary judgment dismissing the action insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiff alleged that she was injured when she tripped on a “bump” in the middle of the base of a pedestrian ramp at a retail store operated by the defendant Lane Bryant, Inc., doing business as Lane Bryant Stores. The ramp was designed by the defendant Abbot & Abbot Architects, PLL, and installed by the defendant third-party plaintiff, E.C. Provini Co., Inc.

The defendants and the third-party defendant Charming Shoppes, Inc., made an initial showing of entitlement to summary judgment by submitting evidence that the defendants neither created the bump nor had actual or constructive notice of its existence *(see Marino v Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.,*21 *670AD3d 531, 532 [2005]; *see also Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,*67 NY2d 836, 837-838 [1986]). In response, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendants created *(see Sanchez-Acevedo v Mariott Health Care Serv.,*270 AD2d 244 [2000]; *Bradish v Tank Tech Corp.,*216 AD2d 505, 506 [1995]), or had actual or constructive notice of the defect *(see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, supra*at 837-838; *Stone v Long Is. Jewish Med. Ctr.,*302 AD2d 376, 377 [2003]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.E, Santucci, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
33-20529, 33-31623, 33-48091 and 33-61803 on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1987
Stock Option Plan, the 1988 Stock Option Plan, the 1991 Stock Option Plan and
the 1995 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, respectively, of One Price
Clothing Stores, Inc. of our report dated March 9, 2001 appearing in this Form
10-K of One Price Clothing Stores, Inc. for the year ended February 3, 2001.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Greenville, South Carolina
April 25, 2001


                                       56
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONBY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connectionwith the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Gas Resources, Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, PeterG. Schoonmaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

Date:  August 14, 2008

 
|   |                                   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ Peter G. Schoonmaker               |
|   | Peter G. Schoonmaker                   |
|   | President and Chief Executive  Officer |
|   |                                   |

 

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 125 (Wednesday, July 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15556]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6685]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``New Amsterdam: The Island at the Center of the 
World''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``New Amsterdam: The Island at the Center of 
the World,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the South Street Seaport Museum, New York, NY, from on or about 
September 13, 2009, until on or about January 7, 2010, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to 
be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/453-8048). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    June 22, 2009.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-15556 Filed 6-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Court Or CormmunPorens OF TexeS 2. Sto ~ ol

WR- 23 50-01
ECE)
Maman Hi SNL ETON cdr mo
~ JUL 2 3 2615
VS.
The. State OF TExAS Abel Acosta, Clerk
Apricant’s Oxretiar AusweR

“To The Howornpve Court OF Commun Aepenls:

The Applicant hy and Yarough himself acting in. pro se Liles
Ais HS Original AnswWer inthe above. writ number out of the.
I'm Wudicial District Coact of Travis County, Teas in Cause.
number ASBbl-A, request Permission to Sle this Orginal
Araver woth the Courts and uwuld show the follwing t

a
The. Opplizané filed his application foc uorit ef habeas coxpus,
forsuant 4o “Tens Cote Criminal Roredure Arsicle VW.07 CWest
law QD13), On Wane d BIS csith the above trial dourt
Gnd Dvisiricd Attomey of “Vavis County. ;

The Disicice AHomey did not Ale ho Sats Original Ansuret or
Kadings of fact Conclusion af lau, with the trial Court of Applicant
The drial Court did met condude. anv findings of Facts in Yhis’
Wabas Corpus Pibceeding. The applicant ums not notified of dhe

Swites intonton not 4o Challenge any Af applicants Gerund of
~ errocS. The @pplicane odos blind sided ishen he received Yhis
Courts white card dated Maly % 2015 informing Applicant the
Bing of his writ 10 Shis Court

“The record in This habeas corpus proceeding having not been
Completed because ne. Opplicant requested. an euidentinry heaving


to develane.0 record fr hig Couct 40 review. The 4rial Ceurt
did nat Gonduat no hearings 4o develope a record Sor dnis
Court +o Fevieu conceming This Nabens proceeding. .

ae oo
“The Stove. having Not Challenge he actual allegations made
in the instant Application leaves no doabt that the Claims the
oppleant present in his WOT useit of habeas cous ace true.
dnd. lenves the State asith no argument hetnuse on the face
of Opplicants I1O7 it is Clearly cognizable. thaP the applicants
Claims are true.and must besetiled by this Court.

pan ,

“In the appliants Qround ef errors in his 1.01 Applicaton his
Allegations a tn Met the State af Texas Prord of Parclons
Gnd Paroles viola Oppliants rights 40 @ Revocation Heaving and
Sent applicant back to prisan for no Cause. Please see NOT
hahas Corps Opplicotion Oreunds of errors.

Ts is rapes for theSinte AHorney to request this Court
+e deny Gpplients laine. The writ of habms Corpus is design and
Wwe proper allenué +o use when O person is held illegally and
restained Against his Nberty, The applicant presarat legit
Facss that his Dav Ptoces Rights uvre vinlotal hy The Texas
Beard of Gacdons and Pardles. The applicane cenuvst this
Cor? +t Order the Texas Rnard of Raicons and Carols +40 \-

mediately reinstate his parole. Plasse seo Applicants NOT writ
GD plication.


WwW
Seniee has been Accomplish by sending 0 Copy af this in-
Stument to! Vela Price, Clerk, Travis Cent nsnict Cleks
(ice, Travis Counsy Diskict Romney. P.O, Rat 18,
Rustin, VX 78767.
Signed eo lst dow of Auly, ao.

#33 qL0L- Roy 1 Unit
IDO FA bS5
Reshaton, VW 41585
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                              ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.
                          Certified Public Accountants
                              25/F., Wing On Centre
                           111 Connaught Road Central
                                    Hong Kong




               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


Osicom Technologies, Inc.
Santa Monica, California


We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(No. 333-28863 and No. 333-22291) on Form S-3 of Osicom Technologies, Inc. of
our report, dated March 4, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Uni Precision Industrial Limited and Subsidiary as of January 31, 1998 and 1997,
and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows and changes in
shareholders' equity for the 10 months ended January 31, 1997 and for the year
ended January 31, 1998, expressed in Hong Kong dollars.




                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.

Hong Kong
April 24, 1998











                                       43
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 80 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 80

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 28, 2019.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, ranked as 
follows on the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Education and Labor: Mr. Walker (to rank immediately after Mr. 
Banks).
    Committee on Homeland Security: Mr. McCaul (to rank immediately after Mr. 
King of New York); and Mr. Higgins of Louisiana (to rank immediately after Mr. 
Walker).
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 83   Filed 06/21/12   Page 1 of 3 PageID: 994

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 83   Filed 06/21/12   Page 2 of 3 PageID: 995

Case 3:11-cv-00247-MLC-LHG   Document 83   Filed 06/21/12   Page 3 of 3 PageID: 996
# table19_q4.2_naics
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00402-CR

EX PARTE Jerry Lee EDWARDS

Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 15, 2015

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On July 2, 2015, relator Jerry Lee Edwards filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, 

requesting that this court review and investigate the allegations in the underlying criminal 

proceeding and determine the legality of his detention. Relator is charged with the felony offense 

of assault. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.01(b) (West Supp. 2014). Relator’s pending criminal 

charge is currently scheduled for trial in August 2015. 

This court, as an intermediate court of appeals, is not authorized to grant the relief relator 

seeks. Pursuant to section 22.221(d) of the Texas Government Code, in civil matters, a court of 

appeals “may issue a writ of habeas corpus when it appears that the restraint of liberty is by virtue 

of an order, process, or commitment issued by a court or judge because of the violation of an order, 

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013CR9303, styled The State of Texas v. Jerry Lee Edwards, pending in 

the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Mary D. Roman presiding.
04-15-00402-CR

- 2 -

judgment, or decree previously made, rendered, or entered by the court or judge in a civil case.” 

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (West 2004). In criminal matters, however, an intermediate 

court of appeals has no original habeas corpus jurisdiction. Chavez v. State, 132 S.W.3d 509, 510 

(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.); Watson v. State, 96 S.W.3d 497, 500 (Tex. App.—

Amarillo 2002, pet. ref’d); Dodson v. State, 988 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, 

no pet.). In criminal matters, the courts authorized to issue writs of habeas corpus are the Texas 

Court of Criminal Appeals, district courts, and county courts. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN.

art. 11.05 (West 2005). Therefore, relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for lack 

of jurisdiction.

In addition, we note that relator has been appointed trial counsel to represent him in 

connection with the currently pending criminal charge. We conclude that any original proceeding 

on relator’s behalf should be presented by relator’s trial counsel. Relator is not entitled to hybrid 

representation. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of 

a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro se petition presents nothing for this court’s 

review. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 

1994, orig. proceeding). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals  associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of  personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                     National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel;  Hormonal signals that regulate ovarian differentiation.                

*Date:*                     July 30, 2009.                

*Time:*                     1 p.m. to 4 p.m.                

*Agenda:*                     To review and evaluate grant applications.                

*Place:*                     National Institutes of Health,  6100 Executive Boulevard,  Room 5B01,  Rockville, MD 20852,  (Telephone Conference Call).                

*Contact Person:*                     Dennis E. Leszczynski, PhD.,  Scientific Review Administrator,  Division of Scientific Review,  National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH,  6100 Executive Blvd., Rm. 5b01,  Bethesda, MD 20892,  (301) 435-6884,                       *leszczyd@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan  Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 29, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-15789 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Order entered January 29 , 2015 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 00403 - CV PROFINITY, LLC, Appellant

V. ONE TECHNOLOGIES, L. P., Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. 12 - 03980 - A



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee/cross

- appellant’s January 26, 2015, unopposed motion to extend time to file reply brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellee/cross

- appellant’s brief be filed no later than March 2, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM SPECTRUM INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(DEBTORS IN POSSESSION) CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
[TYPE]                                                             EX-27.1
[TEXT]
[ARTICLE]                                                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                                               1,000
       
<S>                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                  MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                         MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                     1,600
<SECURITIES>                                                 449
<RECEIVABLES>                                                200
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   6
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           2,514
<PP&E>                                                       598
<DEPRECIATION>                                               340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             2,772
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      1,503
<BONDS>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                       2
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    1
<OTHER-SE>                                                   675
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               2,772
<SALES>                                                      143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           1,833
<CGS>                                                         52
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 52
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             157
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (3,077)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (3,077)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            (3,077)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             (2.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (2.33)
        


</TABLE>