alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2023 ND 5

In the Interest of S.M.B.
Adam D. Miller, PsyD, Petitioner and Appellee

v. S.M. B ., Respondent and Appellant

No. 20220365

Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Daniel D. Narum , Judge.

AFFIRMED

. Per Curiam

. Leo A. Ryan, Special Assistant Attorney General, Jamestown, N

. D ., for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.

A ndrew S. Marquart, Fargo, N

. D ., for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.1 Interest of S.M.B. No. 20220365

Per Curiam

. [¶1] S.M.B. appeals from an order for continued treatment at the North Dakota State Hospital for a pe riod not to exceed one year. S.M.B. argues the district court erred in finding him mentally ill and a person requiring treatment. We conclude the district court’s findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We sum marily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a) (2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 725 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 725

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 21, 2019.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Oversight and Reform: Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, 
Chair.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
MARCH 2024

RETIREMENT AND SURVIVOR BENEFITS

IB-2 Railroad Retirement and Survivor Benefits

RB-20 Medicare for Railroad Workers and their Families

G-508 Employee Guide to Railroad Retirement Benefits

RB-3 Furnishing Evidence to Support your Claim

TXB-85 Taxation of Railroad Retirement Act Annuities

G-177B Requirements for Crediting Military Service toward Benefits under

the Railroad Retirement Act

G-177L General Information about Continuing in or Returning to Nonrailroad

Employment after Retirement under the Railroad Retirement Act

SEPT 2019 Myths and Facts about Railroad Retirement

FEB 2024 Spouses Encouraged to Apply for Benefits

APRIL 2022 Q&A: Buyouts and Railroad Retirement Benefits

MARCH 2024 Q&A: Annuitants May Need to Increase Tax Withholding at 62

MAY 2023 Q&A: Private Rail Pensions May Reduce Supplemental Annuities

FEB 2023 Q&A: Railroad Retirement Spouse and Widow(er)s’ Annuities and

Public Service Pensions

OCT 2022 Q&A: Railroad Retirement Annuities and Pensions from Work not

Covered by Railroad Retirement or Social Security

UNEMPLOYMENT AND SICKNESS BENEFITS

UB-9 Railroad Unemployment and Sickness Benefits

G-508A Employee Guide to Unemployment and Sickness Benefits

UB-10 Unemployment Benefits for Railroad Employees

(includes unemployment benefit application)

UB-11 Sickness Benefits for Railroad Employees

(includes sickness benefit application)

JUNE 2023 Q&A: Unemployment and Sickness Benefits for Railroad Employees

UNION REP ORDER FORM

Educational Materials for Railroad Retirement Benefits

FORM NUMBER/

DATE ISSUED TITLE

AMOUNT

NEEDED
OTHER

JAN 2024 myRRB Handout

DEC 2023 Annual RRB Reminders (Form G-34)

T-83 Offices of the Railroad Retirement Board

IB-7 Facts About the NRRIT

IB-3 Customer Service Plan

How You Can Help the RRB (Office of the Inspector General)

ADDITIONAL ITEMS (NOT IN SEMINAR KITS)

UB-12 Guide to Finding the Right Job

IB-6 Separation and Dismissal Allowances under the Railroad Retirement 

and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts

G-177S General Conditions Under Which a Person is Entitled to a Railroad 

Retirement Widow(er)/Surviving Divorced Spouse Annuity

JAN 2024 When Can I Retire? Employee Handout

JAN 2024 When Can I Retire? Spouse Handout

JAN 2024 When Can A Widow(er) Retire? Handout

PUBLICACIONES EN ESPAÑOL

UB-10S Beneficios de Desempleo para Empleados Ferroviarios

UB-11S Beneficios de Enfermedad para Empleados Ferroviarios

RB-4A Guia de Bolsillo Acerca de Beneficios de Jubilacion Ferroviaria y de 

Sobrevivientes

All items (including this order form) are available at: RRB.gov/LMO/kits

YOUR NAME: ___________________________________________________________________

YOUR ADDRESS: ___________________________________________________________________

 (Street address only – Unable to deliver to post box)

___________________________________________________________________ 

(City) (State) (Zip Code)

PLEASE FAX THIS FORM TO (312)751-3377. ALLOW 30 DAYS FOR RECEIPT OF ITEMS.
# table89_q11.2_state
Exhibit 32.1



                   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                       As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Procyon Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, the undersigned
President and acting Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer of
the Company, do certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.

Dated:  September 27, 2003

/s/  John C. Anderson
-----------------------------
     John C. Anderson
     President and acting Principal Executive,
     Financial and Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Charles C. Ward, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer of Constellation Energy Partners LLC, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:

(i) The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) The information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Constellation Energy Partners LLC.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Charles C. Ward                  
|Charles C. Ward                      
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                                     
|November 6, 2009
ACCEPTED

12-14-00367-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

7/24/2015 4:48:27 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 7/24/2015 4:48:27 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
(More)

No. 23-4 For Immediate Release

April 2023

Brandenburg Named Attorney-Advisor to RRB Management Member

Erin Brandenburg has been appointed as an attorney-advisor to the Management 

Member of the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB), Thomas R. Jayne. In this role, 

she will advise and counsel on a variety of financial, management, and legal issues 

affecting the RRB’s benefits and programs.

Prior to her appointment, Ms. Brandenburg was Deputy Circuit Executive for the 

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. In that role, she supported the operational 

and administrative functions of the office, including supervising human resources, 

workplace relations, space and facilities, security, budget, and information technology 

for the court of appeals. She also advised the chief circuit judge, clerk of court, and 

circuit executive regarding policy matters and revised several policies and practices 

within the circuit.

From 2014 to 2020, she served as a federal administrative judge for the Merit 

Systems Protection Board (MSPB), where she presided over and decided appeals filed 

by federal employees, conducted hearings and settlement conferences, presented at 

employment law conferences, and assisted with the agency’s shift to electronic case 

management. Prior to the MSPB, she served for 11 years as a law clerk to four federal 

judges within the Seventh Circuit. 

Outside of her federal service, Ms. Brandenburg was Senior Associate General 

Counsel for DePaul University, serving as the primary attorney for DePaul athletics and 

advising the university on student conduct, health and welfare, Title IX, academic 

integrity, disability issues, facility operations, and residential education and housing. 

U.S. Railroad Retirement Board

RRB News

844 North Rush Street Chicago, Illinois 60611-1275

RRB.gov

General Information: 877-772-5772

Public Affairs

Media Inquiries: opa@rrb.gov

312-751-4777
-2-

She began her legal career as an associate attorney at Winston and Strawn in Chicago, 

Illinois, and has also taught legal writing and appellate advocacy at Notre Dame Law 

School.

Ms. Brandenburg calls Othello, Washington home, but has lived in Chicago for 

many years with her partner, Patrick Muench, and three children, ages 19, 16, and 7. 

She received her Bachelor of Arts in English and Philosophy from Seattle University 

(1997), where she played varsity basketball, and her Juris Doctor from Notre Dame 

Law School (2000).

# # #

An independent federal agency headquartered in Chicago, the RRB pays about 

$13.5 billion a year in benefits under the federal Railroad Retirement and Railroad 

Unemployment Insurance Acts covering the nation’s railroad workers and their 

families.
#### Anthony J. DeCintio, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Marie DeCintio, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v Lawrence Hospital et al., Defendants, and Michael Chang, M.D., Respondent. Anthony J. DeCintio, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Marie DeCintio, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v Lawrence Hospital et al., Defendants, and Dev Panigrahi, M.D., Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 587]

Orders, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Yvonne Gonzalez, J.), entered May 16, 2005, granting the motions for summary judgment by defendants Chang and Panigrahi, and dismissing the complaint and cross claims against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The medical malpractice claim against Dr. Chang is based on an allegation that he negligently administered a penicillin-related drug to plaintiffs’ decedent, causing a severe reaction and further complications. Dr. Chang made a prima facie case of entitlement to summary judgment by submitting evidence, including medication sheets, deposition testimony of the nurses who administered medication to decedent and a report by the Department of Health, all showing that the patient had not been treated with a penicillin-related drug. In opposition, plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact to defeat summary judgment *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 325 [1986]).

Dr. Panigrahi is an otolaryngologist who treated decedent on four occasions during her nine-month stay at Lawrence Hospital, and at one point performed a tracheotomy. It is undisputed that plaintiffs’ health care representative was informed and made aware of the risks and benefits of this procedure.

Plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether decedent was treated by these two defendants without informed consent (Public Health Law § 2805-d [1], [3]). The affidavits of plaintiffs’ expert were conclusory and insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Lynn G. v Hugo,*96 NY2d 306, 310 [2001]; *Aharonowicz v Huntington Hosp.,*22 AD3d 615 [2005]). They offered no particulars as to how the failure to inform the health care representative of the alleged instances of anaphylactic shock or ventricular fibrillation might have impacted on the decedent’s medical treatment and proximately caused her injury. *330Concur—Saxe, J.E, Friedman, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-60728

Summary Calendar

JEFFERSON JARAMILLO-CHANG

Petitioner

v.

MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A94 895 763

Before DAVIS, GARZA and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jefferson Jaramillo-Chang, a native and citizen of Colombia, petitions this

court for review of an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)

denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings. Jaramillo-Chang argues

that the BIA erred by denying his motion to reopen to consider new evidence in

support of his asylum claim. To the extent that Jaramillo-Chang’s motion to

reopen was based upon his eligibility for other claims for relief, he has

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 5, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-60728

2

abandoned those other claims. See Soadjede v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th

Cir. 2003) (issues not raised in alien’s brief in support of his petition for review

of decision by BIA were deemed abandoned).

This court reviews for an abuse of discretion when the BIA denies a motion

to reopen based upon a failure to establish a prima facie case for the relief

sought. Pritchett v. INS, 993 F.2d 80, 83 (5th Cir. 1993). Jaramillo-Chang’s

asylum claim was denied because he failed to establish past persecution and

because he failed to show a nexus between the harm he feared and any protected

ground. Moreover, the threat to Jaramillo-Chang was not country-wide, as he

had lived in other parts of Colombia without being threatened. The new

evidence offered by Jaramillo-Chang in his motion to reopen did not resolve

those deficiencies. The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying JaramilloChang’s motion to reopen. Id.

Jaramillo-Chang’s petition for review is DENIED.
##### 



(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September
30, 2006 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Robert G. CostantiniRobert G. CostantiniExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### DD & TJ, Inc., Appellant, v Estate of Sol Goldman, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

[823 NYS2d 59]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), entered on or about August 11, 2005, which, in an action for property damages sustained by plaintiff tenant as a result of a defective roof, insofar as appealed from, granted defendants landlords’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The action is barred by the lease provision in which plaintiff agreed to take possession of the premises “in its ‘as is’ condition and to make all of the required repairs to the demised premises including repairing the roof.” Giving plaintiffs evidence every favorable inference, no issues of fact are raised as to whether defendants waived or should be estopped from asserting this “as is” clause *(see Nassau Trust Co. v Montrose Concrete Prods. Corp.,*56 NY2d 175, 184 [1982]). We have considered plaintiffs’ other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, EJ., Tom, Saxe, Sullivan and McGuire, JJ.
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, James P. McDonough, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Abington
Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section.1350), that:

1.  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
    December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
    Section.78m or 78o(d)); and

2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

<Table>
<S>                                                    <C>
Dated: May 13, 2003

                                                       /s/ JAMES P. MCDONOUGH
                                                       ---------------------------------------------
                                                       James P. McDonough
                                                       Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
</Table>
Exhibit 32.1
                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tetragenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martin
Schacker,  as Co-Chief  Executive Officer hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

         1.   The report fully complies with the requirements of  Section  13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in the report fairly  presents,  in  all
              material   respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results of
              operations of the Company as of and for the period covered  by the
              Report.




                                                     /s/ MARTIN SCHACKER
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Martin Schacker
                                                     Co-Chief Executive Officer
                                                     November 14, 2007


                                       11
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 984 

Condemning Twitter’s partisan censorship of President Donald J. Trump. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 28, 2020 

Mr. LAMBORN (for himself, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. BIGGS, and Mr. 

BANKS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning Twitter’s partisan censorship of President 

Donald J. Trump. 

Whereas the United States is founded upon the free exchange 

of ideas and the ability of all Americans to speak freely; 

Whereas there have been instances of apparent leftwing bias 

in Twitter and other California technology companies; 

Whereas there has been a demonstrated effort by Twitter to 

obstruct and interfere with President Trump’s ability to 

get his message through to the American people; 

Whereas Twitter has followed the lead of some in the biased 

news media and deemed themselves ‘‘fact checkers’’ as a 

smokescreen to lend its political tactics some false credibility; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 984 IH 

Whereas Twitter had previously agreed to provide a public 

social media platform free of censorship, but has not 

upheld its commitment; 

Whereas a Twitter staffer deactivated the Twitter account of 

the President of the United States in 2017 without a legitimate reason; 

Whereas a politically motivated Twitter staffer erroneously 

claimed that tweets from the President of the United 

States on May 27, 2020, contained ‘‘misleading’’ information; 

Whereas Twitter has improperly applied its new ‘‘civic integrity policy’’, which protects the free speech of its users; 

Whereas Twitter’s new civic integrity policy standard has not 

been applied consistently across the Twitter platform; 

Whereas Twitter has continued its historic lack of transparency in its implementation of the civic integrity policy; 

Whereas the leader of Facebook, another large social media 

platform, publicly noted that privately owned social media 

platforms should not act as ‘‘arbiter[s] of truth’’; 

Whereas, unimpeded by censorship, the President’s political 

challengers continue to use Twitter to promote their political platform and encourage voter participation while 

Twitter singles out the President’s account; 

Whereas the President has more than 80 million Twitter followers; and 

Whereas the President uses his Twitter account to communicate with the American public and bypass the often biased and discriminating reporting of the many in the 

news media: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 984 IH 

1 (1) unequivocally condemns Twitter’s biased 

2 and unwarranted censorship of the President of the 

3 United States, Donald J. Trump; 

4 (2) strongly disapproves of Twitter’s partisan 

5 and politically motivated content moderation; and 

6 (3) demands that Twitter end its discriminatory 

7 practices and consistently protect the First Amend8 ment rights of all Americans, including the Presi9 dent of the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
{"agency":"NIGC","generated":"2015-02-26 16:41:17","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"}],"value":"2014"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"8"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["NIGC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["16"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["18"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["21"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2014","quarter":"Q3"}
# table76_q10.1_naics