alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 24, 2015

No. 04-15-00416-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.H., A.H., AND A.H.,

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-PA-00033

Honorable Brenda Chapman, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In this accelerated appeal of an order terminating parental rights, the reporter’s record 

was due to be filed with this court on July 17, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1(b). On July 21, 

2015, court reporter Delcine M. Benavides filed a notification of late record. She requested a

ten-day extension of time to file the reporter’s record until July 27, 2015. 

The court reporter’s request is GRANTED. The reporter’s record is due to be filed on

July 27, 2015. See id. R. 35.3(c) (limiting an extension in an accelerated appeal to ten days). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-3 Nos. 333-07415 and 333-68935) of Boddie-Noell Properties,  Inc. of our
report  dated  January  13,  1999  (except  for Note 11 as to which  the date is
February 26, 1999) with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
schedule of Boddie-Noell  Properties,  Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.




                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Raleigh, North Carolina
March 26, 1999


                                      142
<PAGE>
#### IndyMac Bank, F.S.B., Respondent, v Joseph LaMattina et al., Defendants, and Vincent Ancona et al., Appellants.

[853 NYS2d 341]

The court properly declined to consider the forum selection clause since appellants failed to assert a jurisdictional defense in their motion *(see Montcalm Publ. Corp. v Pustorino,*125 AD2d 188 [1986]), and only raised the effect of the clause for the first time in paragraph 34 of their attorney’s 37-paragraph reply affirmation *(see Ritt v Lenox Hill Hosp.,*182 AD2d 560, 562 [1992]).

Ancona was a “seller” pursuant to the unambiguous seller guide incorporated by reference in the customer agreement, and was subject to the warranties and representations therein. Appellants’ breach was sufficiently alleged. The claim for negligent retention of a closing agent was viable. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT (10)(r)

EXTENSION NO. 2 OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Extension of Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into as of
the 9th day of May 2001, by and between Calloway's Nursery, Inc., a Texas
corporation ("Employer") and John S. Peters ("Employee").

WHEREAS, Employee has been employed by Employer under the terms of an employment
agreement dated July 2, 1991 (the "Original Agreement"), which was extended on
July 2, 1996 ("Extension No. 1"), which would terminate by its terms on July 2,
2001; and

WHEREAS, Employer and Employee each desire to renew and extend the term of the
Original Agreement, as amended by Extension No. 1;

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and
of the mutual covenants and agreement contained herein, and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged,
the parties agree as follows:

     9.  In accordance with the provisions of the last sentence of Section 3 of
         the Original Agreement, the Term, as defined in that agreement, is
         amended so that it will end on July 2, 2006, unless earlier terminated
         by either party pursuant to its terms.

     10. The address for the Employer in Section 10 is amended to read as
         follows:

                  Calloway's Nursery, Inc.
                  4200 Airport Freeway, Suite 200
                  Fort Worth, TX  76117-6200

     11. The Salary in Section 4(a) is amended to $175,000.

     12. Except as amended by Extension No. 1 and by this Extension No. 2, all
         of the terms and provisions of the Original Agreement are ratified,
         confirmed and approved.

                                    EMPLOYER:

                                    CALLOWAY'S NURSERY, INC.

                                    BY:  /s/ James C. Estill
                                         -------------------
                                         James C. Estill, President

                                    EMPLOYEE:

                                    BY:  /s/ John S. Peters
                                         ------------------
                                         John S. Peters
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NU-KOTE HOLDINGS, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,272
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,669
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,542
<INVENTORY>                                     47,310
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,525
<PP&E>                                          81,031
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 152,449
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,397
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           223
<OTHER-SE>                                     (65,837)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   152,449
<SALES>                                        240,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               240,529
<CGS>                                          204,991
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,663
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (54,089)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (515)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (54,972)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (54,972)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (2.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.52)


</TABLE>
Case 2:10-cr-00854-MCA Document 50 Filed 04/07/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 142
Case 2:10-cr-00854-MCA Document 50 Filed 04/07/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 143
Exhibit 32.02
                                                                  -------------

                                 CERTIFICATION

      I, Debi B. Halbert, the Chief Financial Officer of ProFutures, Inc., as
general partner of ProFutures Diversified Fund, L.P., certify that (i) the Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 of ProFutures Diversified Fund, L.P.
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ProFutures
Diversified Fund, L.P.



                     PROFUTURES DIVERSIFIED FUND, L.P.

                     By:  ProFutures, Inc., general partner



                     By:  /s/ Debi B. Halbert

                          ---------------------------------
                          Debi B. Halbert
                          Chief Financial Officer
                          April 2, 2007
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11800 and #11801]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Kansas (FEMA-1849-DR), dated 06/25/2009. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Straight-line Winds, and Tornadoes. *Incident Period:*
                         04/25/2009 through 05/16/2009.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         06/25/2009. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         08/24/2009. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/25/2010.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 06/25/2009, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. *The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster:* *Primary Counties:*
                     Anderson, Barber, Bourbon, Butler, Chase, Cherokee, Coffey, Cowley, Crawford, Elk, Finney, Greenwood, Harper, Harvey, Kingman, Labette, Linn, Lyon, Marion, Marshall, Montgomery, Morris, Neosho, Reno, Rice, Sumner, Wabaunsee, Wilson. *The Interest Rates are:* Percent*Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere:*
4.500*Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere:*
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11800B and for economic injury is 11801B. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E9-15714 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
RECEIVED

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS|

v' HOUSTON, TEXAS

JUL 2 4 Z015

CHRISTOPHER A. PRIME

CLERK * l

--,— TLidl^otfrt Case No. 1363644

BRIAN VICTORIAN

appellant

THE STATE OF TEXAS

appellee

§§

FILED IN

1ST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON. TEXAS

The 182nd DISTRICT COURT

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS,

FILED IN

no. 0l-l3-eW4pICRIMINALAPPEALS

JUL 27 2015

Absl Acosts Ciprk

APPELLANT SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME '

Accordingingly, RULE 63.2 (c), The Court of Criminal Appeals

may extend the time to file a petition for discretionary review if

to.

a party files a motion complying with Rule 10.5 (b;* no later than

15 days after the last day for filing the petition. The Court of

Criminal Appeals may extend the time to file a response or reply

if a party files a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b) either before

or after the response or reply is due.

Issues the Court of Criminal Appeals should consider:

• Appellant has NO brief from his appellant attorney in order to

file an appropriate PDR.

• Appellant is not an attorney and is completely ignorant of the

law -and understands "ignorance is no excuse'" however, appellant

has psychological issues that renders him more than a lament to

the law.

• Appellant is depending on the help from total strangers in prison

wtfbm may or may not truly understand the fine workings of the law.

Appellant begs these Court to extend his time to the maximugi

GQUBTQFCMNA1

JUL WSfi

Ab8l/to08ta,Cterk
amount of time allowed to file his briefs.The additional time is

truly needed to aquire needed records and to file. This request

is not designed to harass or cause unnecessary delay in the proceedings

Accordingly, Appellant respectfully request a full fourty-five

days after the July 30 extension, to draft and file the appropriate

response.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct under

the penalty of purjury.

Victor^an#l^

Stiles Unit

3060 Route 3514

Beaumont, Texas 77705
d.tJS!J,GvaJq/r.ff}~ f7; tfl I 01]~ -~ sese~ f"jTe.xc;s 78'1SS 

-41~--~~~~~~----~~~a_c~J~~~~~~~---

b 

COURT OF CR!P.mJAL APPEALS 

JUL 24 2015 

? 

I 

- .•
Case 3:10-cv-06317-JAP -LHG Document 1-7 Filed 12/06/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 65
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 24, 2015

NO. 03-14-00324-CR

Juan Francisco Rodriguez-Linares, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 427TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and 

the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s 

judgment but that there was error requiring correction. Therefore, the court modifies the trial 

court’s judgment on count one of the indictment to include a finding that appellant used a deadly 

weapon other than a firearm when committing the aggravated sexual assault. We affirm the 

judgment as modified. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of 

costs is made.
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ronald W. Thiessen, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Quartz Mountain Resources Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i)     the Annual
Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2015 (the
Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)    the information
contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date
    October 3rd, 2016By:
    Ronald W. ThiessenTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer


This written statement is being furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report
on Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 842 

Requiring an affirmative vote of a majority of the Members present and 

voting, a quorum being present, on final passage of House Joint Resolution 79. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2020 

Mr. RASKIN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Requiring an affirmative vote of a majority of the Members 

present and voting, a quorum being present, on final 

passage of House Joint Resolution 79. 

1 Resolved, That an affirmative vote of a majority of 

2 the Members present and voting, a quorum being present, 

3 shall be required on final passage of House Joint Resolu4 tion 79. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Rasaad DeF., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 516]

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). The evidence supports a reasonable inference that appellant threatened a police officer with an apparent pistol and then, while fleeing, divested himself of the object in a manner that escaped the notice of the pursuing police. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.
# table144_q15.3_size
Case 2:11-cr-00001-SDW Document 16 Filed 12/06/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 50
Case 2:11-cr-00001-SDW Document 16 Filed 12/06/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 51
Exhibit 32.2

Section 1350 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Dollarama Group L.P. and Dollarama Group Holdings L.P. (together, the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 3, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Robert Coallier, Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of the Company, Dollarama Group GP Inc., certify that to my knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, as amended; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date: June 12, 2009



/s/ Robert CoallierRobert Coallier Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
.jl 'i\ ---~ 1-' 

~\ 

PAUL J. FISHMAN 

United States Attorney 

CHARLES GRA YBOW 

Assistant United States Attorney 

970 Broad Street, Suite 700 

Newark, NJ 07102 

Tel.: 973-353-6094 

Fax.: 973-297-2010 

RECE~VED 

JAN 2 8 2014 

ORIGINAl 

e-mail: charles.graybow@usdoj .gov 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rei. 

Hon. Freda L. Wolfson 

Plaintiff, 

Civil Action No. 10-6195 (FLW) 

v. 

ORDER RESTORING CASE TO 

ALLSTATE MEDICAL SUPPLIES, LLC? et ACTIVE DOCKET, DISMISS~NG 

al., COMPLAINT, AND UNSEALING 

CERTAIN DOCUMENTS 

Defendants. 

FILED IN CAMERA AND UNDER SEAL 

The United States having notified the Court, pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C~ 

§§ 3 730(b )( 4), of its election not to intervene in the above-captioned action; 

~ The United States having notified the Court ofits consent to dismissal pursuant to 31 

U.S.C. § 3730(b)(l); 

The Relator having filed his request to voluntarily dismiss this action pursuant to 

F.R.C.P. § 41; 

Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert having ordered that a redacted version of the 

Complaint be unsealed; therefore 

,) 

Case 3:10-cv-06195-FLW-DEA Document 15 Filed 01/28/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 152
IT IS on this .:/ fti. day of~{ , 20~ . 

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively reopen the above-captioned 

action and restore it to the Court's active docket; and it is further 

ORDERED that this action shall be dismissed with prejudice to the Relator and without 

prejudice to the United States, and that the case shall be closed; and it is further 

ORDERED that this Order shall be unsealed; and it is further 

ORDERED that all' other documents in this matter (including, but not limited to, any 

applications filed by the United States for an extension of the sixty-day investigative period or 

for any other reason) shall remain under seal and shall not be made public. 

N 

Unit d States District Judge 

Case 3:10-cv-06195-FLW-DEA Document 15 Filed 01/28/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 153
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 9 , 2015.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00274

- CR

JOSEPH BARNARD HINES , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
On Appeal from the 180th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca use No. 776436



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
A ppellant entered a guilty plea to aggravated robbery . O n November 1, 1999 , pursuant to an agreement with the State, the trial court s entenced appellant to confinement for fifteen years in the Institutional Division of th e Texas Department of Criminal Justice

. Appellant filed an untimely pro se notice of appeal on August 8, 2000 . This court dismissed appellant’s direct appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Hines v. State , No. 14

- 00

- 01014

- CR, 2001 WL 8322, at *1 (Tex. App.

— H ouston [14th Dist.] Jan. 4, 2001, no pet.) (not designated for publication).2

On February 16, 2015, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal attempting to challenge the order from the juvenile court waiving jurisdiction over him , certifying him for trial as an adult, and transferring the aggravated robbery case to the criminal court. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 54.02 (West 2014)

. According to the notice of appeal, appellant was originally charged with aggravated robbery as a juvenile in the 313th District Co urt. A defendant may appeal an order of a juvenile court certifying him to stand trial as an adult and transferring him to a criminal court only in conjunction with the appeal from the conviction or order deferring adjudication of the offense for which the defendant was transferred. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.47 (West 2006 ) ; Moon v. State , 451 S.W.3d 28, 39

– 40 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (stating a juvenile offender may no t immediately appeal from the juvenile court’ s waiver of jurisdiction; instead, he must wait until h e has been c onvicted in an adult criminal court to complain on a ppeal of some error in the juvenile court’ s transfer ruling) . Therefore, appellant was required to appeal the juvenile court’s order in a timely appeal from his aggravated rob bery conviction. We lack jurisdiction over this attempted appeal. To invoke an appellate court’ s jurisdiction over an appeal, an appellant must file a timely and proper notice of appeal. Woods v. State , 68 S.W.3d 667, 669 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002)

. If an
app ellate court ’ s jurisdiction is not properly invoked, the court has no power to act other than to dismiss the appeal. Id. Appellant’s notice of appeal filed in 2015 is untimely to appeal the juvenile certification order leading to his 1999 conviction.
Acco rdingly, we order the appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM
Pane l consists of Justice Christopher, Brown, and Wise.
Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT VON PAILLETT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 189 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of September, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
# covid_table20_q7_state