alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15453]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1322-000]


Meadow Lake Wind Farm, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

June 24, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Meadow Lake Wind Farm, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is July 14, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance 
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#25636077666a4b494c4b40765055554a575165434057460b424a53"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="662023342529080a0f080335131616091412260003140548010910">[email protected]</span></a>. 
or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-15453 Filed 6-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 126 (Thursday, July 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15706]



[[Page 31795]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Veterans' Advisory Committee on Environmental Hazards; Notice of 
Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Veterans' Advisory Committee on Environmental Hazards will be held July 
20-21, 2009, in room 630 at 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 
from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. each day. The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary 
of Veterans Affairs on adverse health effects that may be associated 
with exposure to ionizing radiation, and to make recommendations on 
proposed standards and guidelines regarding VA benefit claims based 
upon exposure to ionizing radiation.
    The major items on the agenda for both days will be discussions of 
medical and scientific papers concerning the health effects of exposure 
to ionizing radiation. On the basis of the discussions, the Committee 
may make recommendations to the Secretary concerning the relationship 
of certain diseases to exposure to ionizing radiation.
    An open forum for verbal statements from the public will be 
available for 30 minutes in the afternoon each day. People wishing to 
make oral statements before the Committee will be accommodated on a 
first-come, first-served basis and will be provided three minutes per 
statement.
    Members of the public wishing to attend should contact Ms. Bernice 
Green at the Department of Veterans Affairs, Compensation and Pension 
Service, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, by phone at 
(202) 461-9723, or by fax at (202) 275-1728. Individuals should submit 
written questions or prepared statements for the Committee's review to 
Ms. Green at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f99b9c8b97909a9cd79e8b9c9c97b98f98d79e968f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0e6c6b7c60676d6b20697c6b6b604e786f20696178">[email protected]</span></a> at least five days prior to the 
meeting. The Committee may ask those who submit material for 
clarification prior to its consideration.

    Dated: June 29, 2009.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-15706 Filed 7-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-20943

Summary Calendar

CONSUELO SALAZAR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

FUTURE SOFT ENGINEERING, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

Houston Division

(H-95-CV-3128)

July 10, 1997

Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In June 1995, Salazar proceeding pro se, filed this Title VII

action against her employer, Future Soft Engineering, Inc. Alleging

sexual harassment and retaliatory discharge. In October 1995,

Salazar retained counsel to represent her in the proceeding. In
2

May 1996, Future Soft Engineering filed a motion for summary

judgment. In August 1996, the district court granted Future Soft

Engineering’s motion for summary judgment. Salazar filed a motion

for a new trial which was denied in September 1996. Salazar timely

filed a notice of appeal from the order denying the motion for new

trial. 

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts,

and relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated

by the district court in its order entered under date of August 12,

1996, we affirm the trial court’s decision to grant summary

judgment in favor of Future Soft Engineering. Likewise, we affirm

the order of the district court entered on September 18, 1996

denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
I. Bruce, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






Date: 
April 15, 2009


/s/  David I. Bruce


David
I. Bruce


Chief
Executive Officer
FILED

7/24/2015 12:40:58 PM

Donna Kay McKinney

Bexar County District Clerk

Accepted By: Consuelo Gomez

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7/27/2015 9:51:39 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
@misc{1213301,
  author = {Kelsea Schumacher and Shawn Platt and Aron Newman and Edward Garboczi and Kathryn L. Beers and Pamela M. Chu},
  title = {Fostering a Circular Economy and Carbon Sequestration for Construction Materials Workshop Report: A Focus on Concrete},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-09-06 04:09:00},
  publisher = {Special Publication (NIST SP), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936747},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1500-21},
  language = {en},
}
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-1897

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Michael L. Watson

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Joplin

____________

 Submitted: January 6, 2017

Filed: January 10, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SHEPHERD, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Michael Watson directly appeals from the sentence the district court imposed

1

after he pleaded guilty to drug and firearm charges, under a plea agreement that

The Honorable Roseann A. Ketchmark, United States District Judge for the

1

Western District Missouri.
contained an appeal waiver, but reserved his right to challenge the imposition of a

career-offender enhancement. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief

under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising arguments related to his

conviction and sentence, and challenging the career-offender enhancement. Watson

has filed a pro se brief and moved for appointment of new counsel. In his pro se

brief, Watson argues that the district court erred in applying the career-offender

enhancement.

We conclude that Watson waived his challenge to the career-offender

enhancement by raising and then withdrawing an objection to it in the district court

proceedings. See United States v. Stoney End of Horn, 829 F.3d 681, 687-88 (8th

Cir. 2016) (where defendant withdrew objection to PSR enhancement in district court,

claim of error on appeal was waived). We further conclude that the appeal waiver is

enforceable as to counsel’s other arguments. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d

702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of validity and applicability of appeal

waiver); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 890-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc)

(discussing enforcement of appeal waivers). Furthermore, we have independently

reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no

non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm as to the career-offender

enhancement and otherwise enforce the appeal waiver, we grant counsel’s motion,

and we deny Watson’s motion.

______________________________

-2-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

PAMELA FORD, §

§ No

. 197, 2020

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below

— Superior C ourt

v. § of the State of Delaw are

SEDWICK CLAIMS §

MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. § C.A. No. K19 C

- 12

- 030

and LOWE ’ S HOME CENTERS, §

INC., §

Defendant Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: November 18 , 2020

Decided: Decem ber 1 , 2020

Before S EITZ , Chief Justice; VA UGHN and TRAYNOR

, Justices.

O R D E R

This 1st day of Decemb er , 2020 , after careful consideration of the parties’

briefs and the record on appeal, it appears to the Court that the judgment of the

Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its

May 20, 2020 Opinion and Orde r

.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
ONE PRICE CLOTHING STORES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

         EXHIBIT 11 -- STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<S>                                                         <C>                   <C>               <C>

                                                            December 30,          December 31,       January 1,
                                                                 1995             1994                1994
PRIMARY
  Average shares outstanding                                 10,313,860            10,287,727       10,167,537
  Net effect of dilutive stock options-
   based on the treasury stock method
   using the average market price                               --                    237,251          236,313
                                                          --------------          -----------
                  TOTAL                                      10,313,860            10,524,978       10,403,850
                                                          ==============          ===========     ============

  Net (loss) income                                       $  (1,304,000)          $ 4,389,000     $  8,724,000
                                                          ==============          ===========     ============

  Net (loss) income per common share                      $       (0.13)          $      0.42     $       0.84
                                                          ==============          ===========     ============

FULLY DILUTED
  Average shares outstanding                                 10,313,860            10,287,727       10,167,537
  Net effect of dilutive stock options -
    based on the treasury stock method
    using the greater of ending or
    average market price                                          --                  239,083          316,067
                                                          -------------           -----------     ------------
                  TOTAL                                      10,313,860            10,526,810       10,483,604
                                                          ==============          ===========     ============

 Net (loss) income                                        $  (1,304,000)          $ 4,389,000     $  8,724,000
                                                          ==============          ===========     ============

 Net (loss) income per common share                       $       (0.13)          $      0.42     $       0.83
                                                          ==============          ===========     ============

</TABLE>

Note:  Net income per share for the year ended  January 1, 1994 was  reported as
$0.84 due to the  immaterial  difference  between  fully diluted and primary net
income per share.
14 ^l/vk)2^i£

FILED IN 1ST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

JUL 16 2015

CHRISTOPHER /^PP'NE

CLERK.3SAC

&e.r{< epffle. CouST

H& &ereUd £. &(L&&IT v Toes efiatj-aul IbTHft* &. efa/

(Loufrd)AppealM». M-M-QOtyS-CV

/Uuj hter- C&rt*6p0*4xiMce. fr/fa f^L Cowrtd/typed* forsr D*Mtf~

via. tieuSfffite ""*$ >^€e/v35?2e &P AAa*! /£ I&iS' )hAat Aiu ttuiAe.

Was S&T tic 6<jht^vbSibtJi BuMe %loiS. Jt& AM>*J 5ak/14 2o/^

0#e. eT l$e. /5^e* C&yipta/AjeLct'#A /*s W*U Case, J5Ceuipiteucu h*

fie^Jtf/j&yfay 2&US. £,/!.§§134-5; I9&3 /98T Thvffwoh&f Me-ftf/rtfi

sues dLri^ffW' /aw6a*r i*t'Me 4i2-Hn D/srrUr feasor ftrav^/lci Cou«~

ynerf u/a6 adttsesZed faPrutfp(xced*Xr /htm4etfJ&M'f(s /neuJhof

our /**/ GoMd&rt, GAteer/ne^r 6»r^ &du,<v &rc&(rrrfrnMSJer^ ^t^w^i^f

"Hie *4*lkufa tcf- <fKrfAeeA-^ m M/wV/%ec/W^j >d US.Q, A,

mi; TMVol ^M4*/ioJhj ifUi (kHSpnSfo*..
ej/dAth, £tf/n *n&se, Cot^ctyAf /&>w fhof drnjur ct&ooLm&tlfe, an^ M&r

/i&lc£jM£ /&*- £&<*w$) &r me., findp*rnv£> /nccu 6<zp^e^K^iK

~/& he. nU- d^cu^r.

Jfrafiu tfes/fflUp/efit&e, ^ m^h/ouf &m&& X€t&oc*rr Man #lu

fypcir /mmeddde wkinotf ** ?&& m&M^ /& ^jjprejc^kpf.

4i e+4*e<4
Order filed August 2, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00543-CR

IN RE WALTER HINTON JUNIOR, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

262nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1316867

ORDER

On Monday, July 25, 2022, relator, Walter Hinton Junior, filed a petition for 

writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. 

R. App. P. 52. 

Relator’s petition does not comply with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 

52.3(k)(1)(A) and 52.7(a). Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A) (“The appendix must

contain: (A) a certified or sworn copy of any order complained of, or any other 

document showing the matter complained of”) (emphasis added); 52.7(a) (“Relator 
2

must file with the petition: (1) a certified or sworn copy of every document that is 

material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying 

proceeding; and (2) a properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony 

from any underlying proceeding, including any exhibits offered in evidence, or a 

statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with the matter 

complained.”) (emphasis added); 52.3(j) (“The person filing the petition must 

certify that he or she has reviewed the petition and concluded that every factual 

statement in the petition is supported by competent evidence included in the 

appendix or record.”). To be a “certified or sworn copy,” in accordance with Rule 

52, the document must be certified by the trial court clerk or attached to either a 

properly prepared affidavit or an unsworn declaration. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. 

Code Ann. § 132.001. 

By this order, the court gives relator notice that the petition will be 

dismissed unless an amended petition is filed on or before September 16, 2022

that addresses the record issues discussed above. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c); see In re 

Kholaif, 624 S.W.3d 228, 231 (order), mand. dism’d, 615 S.W.3d 369 (Tex. 

App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2020) (orig. proceeding).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Poissant.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Case 3:10-cr-00828-MLC Document 6 Filed 12/03/10 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 27
Case 3:10-cr-00828-MLC Document 6 Filed 12/03/10 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 28
Case 3:10-cr-00828-MLC Document 6 Filed 12/03/10 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 29
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter
ended June 26, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard L. Markee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vitamin
Shoppe, Inc.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 5, 2010



/s/    RICHARD L. MARKEERichard L. Markee
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as
part of this Report.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00711-CV

OCTAVIO RAYA

v.

RIO MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC AND WYATT HIDALGO FARMS, INC.

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 4 of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CL-11-3862-D

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 23, 2015
****EXHIBIT 32.2****

 

****Certificationof Periodic Financial Report****

****Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350****

 

Forpurposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Dannette Boyd, the ChiefFinancial Officer of Integrated Management Information, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

 
|   | (i)  | the  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period  ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | (ii) | the  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| Date:  May 15, 2008                |
|-----------------------------------------|
|                                    |
| /s/  Dannette Boyd                      |   |
| Dannette  Boyd, Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in post-effectiveAmendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement No. 33-7053 on Form S-8, in Registration Statement Nos. 33-44700, 333-44024 and 333-46218 on Form S-8 of our report dated January 12, 2009, with respect to the Consolidated FinancialStatements of Archon Corporation in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2008. 

/s/ Piercy Bowler Taylor & Kern

Las Vegas, Nevada 

January 12, 2009