alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 127 (Monday, July 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 32012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15712]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA).

ACTION: Notice of open Federal Advisory Committee meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The SBA is issuing this notice to announce the location, date, 
time and agenda for the third quarter meetings of the National Small 
Business Development Center (SBDC) Advisory Board.

DATES: The meetings for the fourth quarter will be held on the 
following dates:

Tuesday, July 21, 2009 at 1 p.m. EST.
Tuesday, August 18, 2009 at 1 p.m. EST.
Tuesday, September 15, 2009 at 1 p.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: These meetings will be held via conference call.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), SBA announces the 
meetings of the National SBDC Advisory Board. This Board provides 
advice and counsel to the SBA Administrator and Associate Administrator 
for Small Business Development Centers.
    The purpose of these meetings is to discuss the following issues 
pertaining to the SBDC Advisory Board:
    -- Summer Site Visit
    -- ASBDC Fall Conference
    -- White Paper Issues
    -- SBA Update
    -- Member Roundtable

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The meeting is open to the public 
however advance notice of attendance is requested. Anyone wishing to be 
a listening participant must contact Alanna Falcone by Friday, July 
17th by fax or e-mail. Her contact information is Alanna Falcone, 
Program Analyst, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416, Phone: 
202-619-1612, Fax: 202-481-0134, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#26474a474848470840474a454948436655444708414950"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e1808d808f8f80cf87808d828e8f84a1928380cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Additionally, if you need accommodations because of a disability or 
require additional information, please contact Alanna Falcone at the 
information above.

Meaghan Burdick,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-15712 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 10, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Richard A. RappaportRichard
                A. Rappaport
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              July
                29, 2008
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed the Quarterly Report of CastlePoint Holdings, Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by the Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented
in the Report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -
15(e) and 15d  15(e)) for the Company and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which the Report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in the Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the
Report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in the Report any change in the Companys internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys second quarter of 2008
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and to
the audit committee of the board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
 /s/ Joel S. Weiner

Joel S. WeinerChief Financial OfficerAugust 14, 2008
 49
-. .-

The Honorable A. Bryan S.pires, Jr.M. D. Opinion No. H- 359 Secretary Texas State Board ofMedical Examiners Re: May the Texas State Southwest Tower Bldg. Suite 900 Board ofMedical Examiners 211East Seventh Street have facsimile signatures of Austin, Texas 78701 its members affixed by a mechanical proces,s to the license certificates it issues. Dear Dr. Spires:

You ask whether members ofthe Texas State Board ofMedical Examiners may satisfy the requirements ofArt. 4503, V. T. C.S., by having facsimiles of their penned signatures made and affixed by mechanical process to license certificates rather than signing each certificate individually by hand. Art. 4503 provides that: All certificates shall be attested by the seal ofthe Board and signed by all members ofthe Board, or aquorum thereof. It is out opinion that a Board member’s use ofafacsimile of a penned signature is in compliance with the statutory requirement. In Mondragon v. Mondragon, 257S.W. 215, 216(Tex. 1923), the Texas Supreme Court stated:

A s.ignature made by rubber stamp, typewriter or printing . . , may be adopted, and the instrument to whi.ch it is signed becomes binding.

p. 1689. The Honorable Bryan Spires, Jr. page 2 (H-359)

In Parsons v. State, 429 S.W, 2d476, 477 (Tex. Crim. 1968), the Court of Criminal Appeals concurred: The use of a stamp producing a facsimile ofan original signature in signing le.gal documents has been upheld by this court. According to BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY:

A “signature” may be written by hand, printed, stamped, typewritten, engraved, photographed, or cut from one instrument and attached to another, and a signature lithographed on an instrument by a party is sufficient for the purpose of signing it; it being immaterial with what kind ofinstrument a signature is made, (Signature, p. 1553). Clearly, a stamped facsimile of a penned signature is a signature and satisfies the requirements ofArt. 4503. SUMMARY A Board member’s use of afacsimile ofhis penned signature affixed to alicense certificate by printing, engraving, or other mechanical process will satisfy the intent and letter of Art. 4503, V. T. C.S. Very truly yours,

Attorney General of Texas

p. 1690.

. The Honorable Bryan Spires page 3 (H-359)

DAVID M. KENDALL, Chair’man Opinion Committee 

## lg

pe 1691
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,107,508              10,936,599
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0                       0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                          6,789,050               3,680,154
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,896,558              14,616,753
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0
<PAYABLES>                                     146,810                 320,101
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0                       0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,749,748              14,296,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,896,558              14,616,753
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              372,825               1,356,891
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           345,022                 668,742
<COMMISSIONS>                                  595,634               1,418,126
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0                       0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<COMPENSATION>                                       0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                666,983                 282,864
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     666,983                 282,864
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   666,983                 282,864
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.55                    3.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     8.55                    3.11
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.6
CERTIFICATION
I, Robert G. Costantini, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Amendment No.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ORBCOMM Inc.; and
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;
Date:August 12, 2010  /s/ Robert G. Costantini Robert G. Costantini,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
 
2
# table182_q17.1_state
Exhibit 4.2


NUMBER ____                       Getgo Inc.                        _____ Shares
                                                                    Common Stock
    Incorporated under the laws of the British Virgin Islands    Cusip G38529106
                 Common Stock 10,000,000 Shares, par value $0.01






THIS CERTIFIES THAT: __________________________
is the owner of ___________________________________
Fully Paid and Non-Assessable Common Shares, Par Value $.0.01 per share of
Getgo Inc. (herein called the "Corporation"). Transferable only on the books of
the Corporation by the holder hereof in person, or by duly authorized attorney,
upon the surrender of this certificate properly endorsed or assigned for
transfer. This certificate and the shares represented hereby are issued and
shall be subject to the laws of the British Virgin Islands and to the provisions
of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Corporation as amended from
time to time. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered
by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.

          Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile
signatures of its duly authorized officers.

Dated:

Henry F. Schlueter                                               Derrin R. Smith
------------------                                               ---------------
Secretary                     Corporate Seal                           President
# Result 8.7
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of --

Raito, Inc. 

Under Contract No. W91238-10-C-0030 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 59034, 59035 

59326,59327 

B. Scott Douglass, Esq. 

Douglass Law Group 

Mill Valley, CA 

Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Robert W. Scharf, Esq. 

Timothy A. Holliday, Esq. 

Alarice R. Hansberry, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorneys 

U.S. Army Engineers District, 

Sacramento 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

During an alternative dispute resolution mediation convened by the Board, the 

parties resolved their dispute and entered into an agreement settling theses appeals. The 

agreement provides for dismissal of theses appeals with prejudice. Accordingly, the 

appeals are hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 21July2015 

ROBERT T. PEACOCK 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 59034, 59035, 59326, 59327 

Appeals ofRaito, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
#### Amira Khamis et al., Appellants, v CG Foods, Inc., Respondent.

[856 NYS2d 132]

The infant plaintiff allegedly sustained personal injuries when she fell through an open cellar door, in the sidewalk, leading to *607the basement of the store owned by the defendant. The doors allegedly were flat on the ground, in the open position, without any safety or cautionary devices such as cones, tape, or other barricades around the opening. “A property owner may be held liable for a dangerous or defective condition on the property if the owner created the condition or had actual or constructive notice of it” *(Enamorado v KHR Holding Co., LLC,*24 AD3d 411, 412 [2005]; *see Ogletree v Rush Realty Assoc., LLC,*29 AD3d 875 [2006]).

The defendant, as the proponent of the motion for summary judgment, had the initial burden of establishing its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by tendering proof, in admissible form, sufficient to demonstrate the absence of any material issue of fact *(see generally Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851 [1985]; *Carbone v Lakeside Mkt. Deli & Pizza, Inc.,*47 AD3d 744 [2008]; *Xu v 688 Sixth Ave. Realty Co.,*19 AD3d 687 [2005]). The defendant failed to make a prima facie showing that it neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition *(see Soto-Lopez v Board of Mgrs. of Crescent Tower Condominium,*44 AD3d 846 [2007]; *Marshall v Jeffrey Mgt. Corp.,*35 AD3d 399 [2006]; *Bosman v Reckson FS Ltd. Partnership,*15 AD3d 517 [2005]).

As the defendant failed to make the prima facie showing necessary for an award of summary judgment, it is unnecessary to consider the adequacy of the plaintiffs’ opposition papers *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]; *Restrepo v Rockland Corp.,*38 AD3d 742 [2007]; *Wolff v New York City Tr. Auth.,*21 AD3d 956 [2005]). Spolzino, J.P., Angiolillo, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
@article{1211191,
  author = {Qihua Zhang and B. Klein and Norman A. Sanford and Ann Chiaramonti Debay},
  title = {Comparative Apex Electrostatics of Atom Probe Tomography Specimens},
  year = {2021},
  month = {2021-04-28 04:04:00},
  publisher = {Journal of Electronic Materials},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=931034},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-021-08932-6},
  language = {en},
}
# Result 8.8
DATA USERS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA 

October 25, 2011 

8:30 Registration

8:45 Introductions and Welcome

9:00 a.m. Commissioner’s Introduction (Keith Hall)

2012 Budget 

Renewal of Committee 

Significant Accomplishments for 2011 

Significant Initiatives for 2012 

9:45 a.m. Follow-up from Past Recommendations (Michael Levi)

Break 10:30 (15 min) 

10:45 a.m. Discuss initiative, Current Employment Statistics data by size class (Ken 

Robertson)

Lunch 11:45-1:00 (possible breakout sessions?)

1:00 p.m. Discuss initiative, Competitiveness measures in the International Price Program 

(Mike Horrigan)

2:00 p.m. Request for DUAC suggestions for improving Access/Query Tools and Output 

Formats on the BLS Website (Rick Kryger or Amrit Kohli) 

Break 2:45 (15 min) 

3:00 p.m. Discuss initiative, Consolidating BLS Publications (Michael Levi)

4:00 p.m. Request for DUAC suggestions for reaching targeted industries with low data 

collection response rates (Jay Mousa)

5:00 p.m. Wrap-up
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Quentin Cunningham, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 474]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Parker, J.), imposed February 25, 2005, on the ground that the sentence is excessive. Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion. Prudenti, EJ., Florio, Ritter, Luciano and Covello, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP,  INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
Registration Statements and amendments thereto:

     Form S-8 No. 33-61269         PMSI and Insta-Care Stock Option Plans
     Form S-8 No. 33-55571         Nonemployee Directors' Stock Option Plan
                                         and Certain ATH Option Plans
     Form S-8 No. 33-21505         Employee Stock Purchase Plan
     Form S-4 No. 33-13243         1985 Beverly Nonqualified Stock Option Plan
     Form S-8 No. 33-65242         1993 Long-Term Incentive Plan
     Form S-3 No. 33-50965         Debt Securities of Beverly Enterprises, Inc.
     Form S-8 No. 333-06549        1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan
     Form S-3 No. 333-03517        $200,000,000 Debt and Equity Securities of 
                                         Beverly Enterprises, Inc.


of Beverly Enterprises, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our report
dated February 7, 1997, except for Note 2, paragraph 3, as to which the date is
March 13, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Beverly Enterprises, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                                         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Little Rock, Arkansas
March 26, 1997
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Tigran Arrathoon, Deceased. Siran Arrathoon, Respondent; Maro A. Goldstone, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 72]

The court properly determined that respondent, who was petitioner and decedent’s daughter, did not meet her burden of demonstrating that petitioner abandoned decedent during his lifetime *(see Matter of Riefberg,*58 NY2d 134 [1983]; *Matter of Maiden,*284 NY 429 [1940]; *Matter of Gardner,*176 AD2d 142 [1991], *lv dismissed*78 NY2d 1124 [1991]). The evidence established that petitioner and decedent, who had been married for 65 years, were each forced by circumstances to live with, or near, the child who could provide them with emotional and practical support, that neither spouse abandoned the other, and that their separate living arrangements were necessitated by their advanced age and failing health.

*326We have considered respondent’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Buckley, Sweeny and Moskowitz, JJ.
Plaintiffs ʼ Notice of Appeal NO. 2011

- 18770

JOAN DEYOUNG, STEPHEN DEYOUNG, M.D., AND DAVID DEYOUNG, Plaintiff s , V. JUDY PAGE MAYNARD, WILLIAM L. MAYNARD, MAYNARD PROPERTIES, L.P., AND BEIRNE, MAYNARD & PARSONS, L.L.P. , Defendants

. § § § § § § § § § § § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

270TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

PLAINTIFF S ʼ NOTICE OF APPEAL

Plaintiffs Joan DeYoung, Stephen DeYoung, M.D., and David DeYoung
(“ plaintiff s”) file this notice of appeal, as follows:

1. This is an appeal from an order granting defendants ʼ motion for summary
judgment
, signed by the Court on February 17, 2015

. 1

2. Plaintiffs have not filed a motion for new trial and, pursuant to Tex. R. Civ.

P. 324 and Tex. R. App. P. 33.1, are not required to do so as a prerequisite for appeal.

3. Plaintiffs desire to appeal the order granting defendant s ʼ motion for
summary judgment to either the First or Fourteenth Court of Appeals in the State of

Texas.

1 While the Court has indicated that an additional judgment will be entered in this matter, this notice of appeal is filed in an excess of caution based on plaintiffs ʼ understanding that the Court considered its February 17, 2015 order to be a final judgment in this matter. ACCEPTED 01-15-00260 FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/30/2015 4:50:24 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKPlaintiffs ʼ Notice of Appeal 2 Respectfully submitted,

THE JACKSON LAW FIRM

/s/ 

## Daniel W. Jackson Daniel W. Jackson, SBN 00796817 Scott K. Vastine, SBN 24056469 3900 Essex Lane, Suite 1116 Hou s ton, Texas 77027 (713) 522

- 4435 (713) 527

- 8850

– fax daniel@jacksonlaw

- tx.com scott@jacksonl aw
- tx.com

Counsel for Plaintiffs

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a copy of the foregoing document has been served on all counsel of
record
, via ProDocs, on March 19, 2015:
Gregory N. Jones Law Office of Gregory N. Jones 2323 S. Shepherd, 14th Floor Hou s ton, Texas 77019
gjones@gnjlaw.net William L. Maynard 1300 Post Oak Blvd, Suite 2500 Hou s ton, Texas 77056
Fax: (713) 960

- 1527

/s/ 

## Daniel W. Jackson
Daniel W. Jackson