alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMALIA MENDOZA ARTIGA, AKA

Amalia Artiga,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-71688

Agency No. A094-830-494

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 21, 2015** 

Before: CANBY, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Amalia Mendoza Artiga, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se

for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from

an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding

of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We

FILED

JUL 28 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

agency’s factual findings, Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008),

and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that, even if

Mendoza Artiga’s asylum application was timely, she failed to demonstrate that

her claimed past persecution or feared persecution was on account of a protected

ground. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992); Parussimova v.

Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir. 2009) (the REAL ID Act “requires that a

protected ground represent ‘one central reason’ for an asylum applicant’s

persecution”); see also Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010)

(petitioner’s “desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or

random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”). 

Because Mendoza Artiga failed to establish past persecution, she does not have a

rebuttable presumption of future persecution. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.13(b)(1),

1208.16(b)(1)(i). Thus, Mendoza Artiga’s asylum and withholding of removal

claims fail. See Zetino, 622 F.3d at 1015-16.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of Mendoza Artiga’s

CAT claim because Mendoza Artiga failed to demonstrate it is more likely than not

2 13-71688
she would be tortured in El Salvador by or with the consent or acquiescence of the

government. See Silaya, 524 F.3d at 1073.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

3 13-71688
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Cleartronic, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



August 20, 2018



By:  /s/ Michael M. Moore

Michael M. Moore

Principal Executive Officer



By:  /s/ Larry M. Reid

Larry M. Reid

Principal Financial Officer
@article{10616,
  author = {Shinichiro Muramoto and Derk Rading and Brian Bush and John Gillen and David Castner},
  title = {Low Temperature Plasma for Bevel Crater Depth Profiling of Crosslinking Organic Multilayers: Comparison with C60 and Argon Gas Cluster Sources},
  year = {2014},
  number = {28},
  month = {2014-07-06},
  publisher = {Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.6981},
  language = {en},
}
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Form 10-Q of Funtalk China Holdings Limited (the “Company”)
for the three months period ended June 30, 2009, as amended, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kim
Chuan (“Jackie”) Leong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period
certified.




/s/
      Kim Chuan (“Jackie”) LeongKim
      Chuan (“Jackie”) LeongChief
      Financial Officer




December 14,
2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements for Summit Tax Exempt L.P. III and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000812220
<NAME>                        Summit Tax Exempt L.P. III
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              59,832
<SECURITIES>                                    45,069,792
<RECEIVABLES>                                      164,883
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,962,262
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              224,367
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,737,895
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,962,262
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,087,312
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   432,410
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,654,902
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,654,902
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
GA-U-S^- KP -©J- I3.-©OSO.§-^CJ5L. /

A04 - |^~QO&QS-C(L,

«g' /^\i£^ o-r (<§xagy, A f> pe_//-Q-g-.^ -ff*&/ G3lu«U; &F APf^MS^

ES-0085-01-07

A

V

/<g>ix«^SK

GsmfCf

^a/ a^&a^

<^d-7^ <5^«jlY ^ <£?-&/^~

FiLEDIN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUL £7 ^IJ

Abel Acosta, Clerk

p^ir^/^^rr^na ntr&t?^ im a

neuovou m

JUL 27 2015

-Ab
# table94_q12.1_naics
Case 2:11-cr-00023-SRC Document 26 Filed 09/22/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 66
Case 2:11-cr-00023-SRC Document 26 Filed 09/22/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 67
Exhibit 32.1

CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Westway Group, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ James B. JenkinsName:

James B. JenkinsTitle:

Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer) and Director


Dated: August 9, 2010
Exhibit
23.1
  HANSEN,BARNETT& MAXWELL,
      P.C.
                  A Professional
      Corporation
                  CERTIFIED PUBLIC
      ACCOUNTANTS
                  5 Triad Center, Suite
      750
                  Salt Lake City, UT
      84180-1128
                  Phone: (801)
      532-2200
                  Fax: (801)
      532-7944
                  www.hbmcpas.com
                Registered with the Public
      Company
                    Accounting
      Oversight Board
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 To the
Board of Directors
 MultiCell
Technologies, Inc.
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 Nos. 333-127553 and 333-162031)of MultiCell Technologies,
Inc. of our report dated February 25, 2010 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of MultiCell Technologies, Inc., for the year
ended November 30, 2009.
  HANSEN,
      BARNETT & MAXWELL, P.C.
                  /s/
      Hansen, Barnett & Maxwell, P.C.
 
 Salt Lake
City, Utah
 February
25, 2010
Exhibit 31.2

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Peter J. Moerbeek, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, of Primoris Services Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
May 13, 2009

/s/ PETER
J. MOERBEEK
Peter J. Moerbeek Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director

---



QuickLinks
#### Degear *against*Nellis.

NEW-YORK,

October, 1817.

Where a defendant in a justice’> court claims exempprisomnent, ‘oñ heeblTMa family! freeMderf *ae*provision! of the act, sess. 36. oh. 53. sec. 7. It, *L.*393.) he must offer proof of the fact at the hearing Of the cause, and if he waits until after judgment has been rendered against him, he is too late. It seems, that the justice is bound to receive proof, on the part of the plaintiff, to disprove the defendant’s exemption.

IN ERROR, on *certiorari*to a justice’s court. *7*v

After the court below was opened, for the trial of this cause. 1 *1*J R>e parties had a conversation relative' to the balance due the plaifltiffbelow, who is the defendant in error, and it was agreed that one *Schram*should settle the amount, who calculated the balance at 19 dollars and 2 cents, for which the justice, by *385the express order and consent of the parties, entered judgment~ The defendant below then offered proof of his having a family~ and not being a freeholder, to entitle himself to exemption from imprisonment, b~t it was rejected by the justice as offered loo late.

*Per*Curiam.

There are no grounds whatever for reversing this judgment. The parties agreed, that the balance due the plaintiff should he calculated by a third person, and the justice, by their order, and with their consent, entered judgment for the amount. This was, therefore, a confession of judgment in open court: and after it had been entered, the defendant below proof of his having a family, and not being a freeholder, to obtain an exemption from imprisonment, according to the of the lltli section of the act, (1M. *R. L.*393.) and this proof was rejected by the justice as coming ido late. In this the justice was'correct. The act declares, that if the defendant shall, on *the hearing*of the cause, prove to the satisfaction of the justice, &c. he shall be entitled to the exemption. The hearing of a cause must he considered as at an end when is rendered. It ought to he upon the hearing, for the might, and probably ought, to hear evidence offered on the other side, showing the allegation to he untrue.

Judgment affirmed#
Order entered June 4, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-14-00503-CV

IN RE JAMES PENNEY AND RUTH PENNEY, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 301st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DF-06-1835-T



### ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the petition for writ of

mandamus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD
JUSTICE
w a uyz^? & yFILED IN '

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUL 2 12S15 , y

Abel Acosta, Clerk

U01# OFCtfitofolAL APPEALS

JUL 2 12015

s! Anosfa. Clerk

(^c>*>o^'5* x/t>^u> /she*-*/ ^ &^**r2>*'

Ci )
p,/&rf^&72^

y~7Mp*T~ 7~~&-zS (20zs7tjr- gz-Tg^T^y— /2^^&^

r^P^y.

C*~&£TffslCar& gy*7 S^K-^t efcSL
f/y^ P< b. /?,

71? S*-&otS 3>-&ot/#> VW^jf ^/ZeZ^^Z

Cll
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of SRKP 10, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September
30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony C.
  PintsopoulosAnthony
      C. PintsopoulosPrincipal
      Financial OfficerOctober
      23, 2009
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

WESTCORP

CERTIFICATION OF CEO

In connection with the Annual Report of Westcorp
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, to the best of his knowledge and belief and pursuant
to 18 U.S.C., Chapter 63, Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



|    |                                                                                                                                                            
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
    Act of 1934; and                          
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    result of operations of the Company.

The foregoing Certification is furnished solely
for purposes of complying with the provisions of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended
to be used for any other purpose.

WESTCORP

Date: March 4, 2004

/s/ ERNEST S. RADY




Ernest S. Rady


Chairman of the Board and


Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS

NEWARK 

 Date: January 16, 2015

JUDGE: HON. CLAIRE C. CECCHI

COURT REPORTER: YVONNE DAVION 

DEPUTY CLERK: JACQUIE LAMBIASE

Docket No. 10-CR-851(CCC)-02

Title of Case: U.S.A. v. ALBERT CERNADAS

Appearances: Anthony Mahajan, AUSA, for the Government

Joseph Hayden, for Defendant CERNADAS

Susan Smalley, U.S. Probation Officer

Nature of Proceedings: Sentence

Conference held.

Sentence: 3 Years of Probation as to Count 1 (remaining Counts dismissed) 

Special Assessment: $100.00 on Count 1 (due immediately)

Fine: $50,000 as to Count 1 

Defendant advised of right to appeal.

Ordered Bail Continued 

Time Commenced: 12:30 p.m. Time Adjourned: 2:30 p.m. 

 Jacquie Lambiase . 

Jacquie Lambiase, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:10-cr-00851-CCC Document 409 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 3608
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7141

LUKE D. PATTERSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. Robert W. Trumble, Magistrate Judge . ( 3:20

- cv
- 00074

- GMG

- RWT )

Submitted : December 22, 2020 Decided: December 29, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Luke D. Patterson , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Luke D. Patterson appeals the magistrat e judge ’s orders denying his motion to waive the filing fee and his motion for reconsideration . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge

. Patterson v. United States , No. 3:20

- cv
- 00074

- GMG

- RWT (N.D.W. Va

. June 11, 2020; July 14, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

DANIEL J. PISZCZATOSKI; et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

THE HON. RUDOLPH A. FILKO, et al., 

 Defendants. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

: 

:

: 

:

No. 2:10-CV-6110 (WHW) (CCC) 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

Notice is hereby given that Plaintiffs DANIEL J. PISZCZATOSKI, JOHN M. DRAKE, 

GREGORY C. GALLAHER, LENNY S. SALERNO, FINLEY FENTON, SECOND 

AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC. and ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY RIFLE & 

PISTOL CLUBS, INC. hereby appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 

from the Opinion (Doc. No. 40) and Order (Doc. No. 41), denying Plaintiffs’ motion for 

summary judgment and granting Defendants’ cross-motion to dismiss, entered in this action on 

the 12th day of January, 2012. 

Dated: January 16, 2012 

 New York, New York 

 

David D. Jensen 

DAVID JENSEN PLLC

61 Broadway, Suite 1900 

New York, New York 10006 

Tel: 212.380.6615 

Fax: 917.591.1318 

david@djensenpllc.com

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Case 2:10-cv-06110-WHW-MCA Document 42 Filed 01/16/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 442
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                             AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                             APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
                        2000 GLOBAL EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

        APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. (the "Company"), having adopted the Applied
Materials, Inc. 2000 Global Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), hereby amends
the Plan as follows:

        1. Section 4.1 is amended by deleting the numeral 53,500,000 from the
first sentence thereof and substituting the numeral 73,500,000 therefor.

        2. This Amendment No. 1 is effective as of October 11, 2001.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, by its duly authorized officer, has
executed this Amendment No. 1 to the Plan on the date indicated below.

                                            APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.


        Dated:  ___________, 2001           By__________________________________
                                              Title:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 10, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
              Richard A. RappaportRichard
                  A. Rappaport
                Principal
                  Executive Officer
                November
                  7, 2006
# NOV 08  1012AM

CDR420

Line-In Record

Other

808.55304