alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Leonard C. Purkis, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Virtual Radiologic Corporation;

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.              The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

(a)         Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.              The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)         All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
|   | Date:  | July 31, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Leonard C. Purkis   |
|--------|--------|--------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   |               |   | Leonard C. Purkis       |
|   |   |               |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Wauson ♦ Probus

A Professional Corporation 

JOHN WESLEY WAUSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW MATTHEW B. PROBUS

jwwauson@w-plaw.com mbprobus@w-plaw.com 

 BOARD CERTIFIED, Civil Trial Law COMERICA BANK BUILDING Also licensed in the Commonwealth

 Texas Board of Legal Specialization ONE SUGAR CREEK CENTER BLVD., SUITE 880 of Massachusetts

SUGAR LAND, TEXAS 77478 

(281) 242-0303 - Telephone

(281) 242-0306 - Telecopier

 

July 24, 2015 

Christopher A. Prine 

Clerk, First Court of Appeals 

First Court of Appeals 

301 Fannin Street 

Houston, Texas 77002-2066 

Re: Case No. 01-15-00573-CV 

Princess Properties Limited Partnership and Cole International, Inc. 

v. 

Vexapak L.L.C., Antonio Gonzalez Cortex aka Antonio Gonzalez Jr. aka Antonio 

D. Gonzalez aka Antonio D. Gonzalez Cortes and Antonio Gonzalez Cardenas 

Dear Sir / Madam: 

 This letter is filed in order to make the payment of the filing fee for the appeal of the 

above-captioned matter. 

 If you have any questions, please let us know. 

 Very truly yours, 

 //s// John Wesley Wauson 

 John Wesley Wauson 

 For the Firm 

ACCEPTED

01-15-00573-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/24/2015 10:54:46 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/24/2015 10:54:46 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cedar Fair, L.P. (the Partnership)
on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Partnership certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

April 30, 2013



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Matthew A. Ouimet                               
|Matthew A. Ouimet                                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                                                    
|/s/ Brian C. Witherow                               
|Brian C. Witherow                                   
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
##### 



(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31,
2007 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Robert G. CostantiniRobert G. CostantiniExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
An unpublisHed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

WILLIAM JEFFREY RASKE, No. 67093
Petitioner,

vs.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FILED
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF JUL 23 2085
CLARK, IE MAN

cu
Respondent. ev.

¥ CLERK

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR
WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

This pro se writ petition challenges a district court default
judgment and a post-judgment ruling on a claim of exemption. In light of
the underlying matter’s progression since this writ petition was filed, we
conclude that our extraordinary intervention is unwarranted. NRS
34.160; NRS 34.320; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222,
228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (recognizing that the petitioner bears the
burden of demonstrating that this court’s intervention is warranted).
Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

; D . Saitta
Sasae J. JJ.

Gibbons Pickering

ce: William Jeffrey Raske
Attorney General/Carson City
Eighth District Court Clerk

‘Supreme Court
oF
Nevava

ores le _ SI
ee ee Ye
# table186_q17.2_size
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 135856 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 135856 COA: 280959 Wayne CC: 01-012804-01 ANDRE LAMAR JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 18, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s0721 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2008

Clerk
RAIL LABOR SYSTEM UNIT REPORT OF CREDITABLE SERVICE MONTHS AND COMPENSATION

1. Name of National Organization

 2. Page ___ of ___ Page(s) S

3. Payroll Report of Reporting Unit (Name and/or Number) 4. RRB Unit No. 5. For Month or Quarter Ending for 

 20____

NOTE: Compensation should NOT be reported in excess of applicable yearly maximums Tier I Maximum Tier II Maximu

 6. Employee Identification

7. 

Month 

of 

Quarter

8. 

Daily 

Pay 

Rate

9. Gross 

Earnings and 

Tier I Medicare 

Earnings

10. 

Employee 

Medicare Tax 

Withheld

11. 

Tier I 

Earnings

12. 

Tier I Employee 

Tax Withheld

13. 

Tier II 

Earnings

 Name 1 

2 

 SSA Number 3  Name 1 

2 

 SSA Number 3  Name 1 

2 

 SSA Number 3  Name 1 

2 

 SSA Number 3  Name 1 

2 

 SSA Number 3  Name 1 

2 

 SSA Number 3 

16. TOTALS

CAUTION: Railroad Retirement Taxes reported on the CT-1 must be deposited by electronic fund transfer with the U. S. Treasury Department. Read the instr

 Form CT-1 for the proper depositing procedures. The frequency of your tax is NOT determined by the completion of Form OE-1. Deposits may be required mo 17. Name and Title 18. Address 19. Telephone Number 20. Date Comp

OE‐1 (05‐14) PRI
FORM OE-1 TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET

TAX CALCULATIONS CT-1 REFERENCES

 To be used for completing Form CT-1 and in determining tax liability.

 A. _$__________ ______________ $ Tier I Employer Tax - 

 Column 11 Total x Tier I Employer Compensation

 Tax Rate

 B. __$_________ ________________ $ Tier I Employer 

 Column 9 Total x Medicare Tax Rate Medicare Tax -

Compensation

 C. _$__________ _______________ $ Tier II Employer Tax - 

 Column 13 Total x Tier II Employer Compensation

 Tax Rate

 D. Column 12 Total $ Tier I Employee Tax - 

Compensation

 E. Column 10 Total $ Tier I Employee 

Medicare Tax -

Compensation

 F. _$__________ x ________________

 Additional Medicare Tier I Employee 

 Tax Rate $ Additional Medicare

 [Paid on compensation exceeding $200,000 Tax - Compensation

 per year for an employee]

 G. Column 14 Total $ Tier II Employee Tax - 

Compensation

 H. Sum of columns A through G $ Total Tax Based

 Railroad Retirement Tax Liability for period on Compensation

 I. _$__________ ________________ $ DC-1 RUIA 

 Column 15 Total x RUIA Contribution Contribution Liability

 Rate for Period

 The amounts in Item A should equal Item D and the amounts in Item B should equal Item E. 

 The items may differ a few cents due to rounding of partial cents.

 PHOTO COPY FOR YOUR RECORDS

OE‐1 (05‐14) PRIOR EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE
(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
period ended September 30, 2009 (the Report), filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
  /s/ Robert G. Costantini

Robert G. CostantiniExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<Page>

                                                               EXHIBIT 10.14(c)



                     FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This First Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of
September 26, 2001, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
("Employer") and Allan C. Youngberg ("Executive").

                                    RECITALS

A)   On July 23, 1999, an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and
     between Employer and Executive.

B)   Employer and Executive now desire to amend the Employment Agreement, as set
     forth hereinbelow:

                                    AGREEMENT

1)   Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement, which provides:

     3.1  TERM. The term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence on
          August 13, 1999 and shall continue until August 12, 2001, unless
          sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter provided (the "Employment
          Term").

          is hereby amended, effective as of August 12, 2001, to provide as
          follows:

     3.1  TERM. The term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence on
          August 13, 1999 and shall continue until August 12, 2002, unless
          sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter provided (the "Employment
          Term").

2)   All other terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain
     unaltered and fully effective.


Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.


EXECUTIVE                                              EMPLOYER
---------                                              --------

                                                    PRICESMART, INC.

Allan C. Youngberg                                  By: /s/ GILBERT A. PARTIDA
                                                        ----------------------

/s/ ALLAN C. YOUNGBERG                              Name: GILBERT A. PARTIDA
----------------------                                    --------------------

                                                    Its:  PRESIDENT/CEO
                                                          --------------------
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Naugler, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Naugler,*111 Ohio St.3d 130, 2QQ6-Ohio-5340.]

(No. 2006-0019

Submitted September 20, 2006

Decided November 1, 2006.)

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Madison County, No. CA2004-09-033, 2005-Ohio-6274. *131Browning & Cooke, Andrew P. Cooke, and Adam J. Bennett, for appellant.

*130{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in *Davis v. Washington*(2006),-U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 2266, 165 L.Ed.2d 224.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00069-CV

IN RE PENTEX FOUNDATION AND 

JOSHUA UNGER, TRUSTEE OF 

GBU FRIENDS AND ASSOCIATES, 

TRUST

RELATORS

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

TRIAL COURT NO. 236-277223-15

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relators’ amended petition for writ of mandamus 

and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ amended 

petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GARDNER and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: July 21, 2015

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Atlantis Plastics, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
   Date: March 30, 2006
    
    /s/ Paul G. SaariPaul G. SaariSenior Vice President, Finance
and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

KEITH BARTELLI, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

JEFFERY A. BEARD, EDGAR KNEISS, 

JAMES MCGRADY, ANGELA AUMAN, 

DR. ARENDA, DR. BOHINSKI, DR. 

OLGA, DR. STANISH, PATRICIA 

GINOCHETTE, WALTER KOSS, LT. P. 

BLIECH, LT. MARCIN , JILL MORAN, RN 

LEAH, RN MURDOCK, SGT. MOISER, 

SGT. STARZINSKI, CHERYL 

WIENEWSKI, JAMES WYNDER, 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 82 MM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary 

Relief is GRANTED to the extent that it seeks mandamus relief. The common pleas 

court is DIRECTED to dispose of Petitioner’s pending action within 90 days.
#### WEAVER v. ERIE R. CO.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

March 9, 1954.

Arnold B. Elkind, New York City, and Howard M. Metzenbaum, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Sunderland & Kiendl, New York City, by Paul J. Yesawich, Jr., Glen Dale, L. I., for defendant, in opposition.

RAYFIEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves under Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U. S.C.A., for an order directing the defendant to produce for inspection, copying and photographing certain reports, statements, maps and records specifically identified and described in the affidavit of Arnold B. Elkind, submitted in support of the motion.

The defendant consents to make available to the plaintiff all the items requested by him except the statements of crew members, for which according to the defendant, the plaintiff has failed to show “good cause” required by the said Rule.

The defendant alleges, and it is not denied, that the plaintiff has obtained the names of these employees, that the depositions of two of them have already been taken and that the depositions of three others were scheduled to be taken March 8, 1954.

I find therefore that the plaintiff has not shown good cause for the inspection of the statements in question, etc., as Rule 34 requires. Palensar v. Isthmian S.S. Co., D.C., 11 F.R.D. 552.

The .motion to inspect, photograph, and copy is granted as to all matters demanded by the plaintiff except the statements of “the remaining crew members”, and as to those the motion is denied without prejudice to renew.

Settle order on notice.
June 28, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

VIRIDINIA Z. PAZ , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00664

- CV V.

CARMEN ROSA MOLINA , Appellee

____________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, CARMEN ROSA
MOLINA , signed July 8, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment.
Therefore, we REVERSE the portion of the trial court’s judgment awarding $5,517.26 in damages for past medical care a nd RENDER judgment reinstating the jury’s award of zero damages for past medical care. We vacate the portion of the trial court’s judgment awarding pre

- judgment interest, and REMAND to the trial court for a recalculation of pre

-

judgment interest, in light of the reduction in the total damage award.
We AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment in all other respects.
We order appellee, CARMEN ROSA MOLINA, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15439]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Breast Cancer and Environmental Research Act of 2008; Delegation 
of Authority

    Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Director, 
National Institutes of Health (NIH), the authorities under Section 2 of 
the Breast Cancer and Environmental Research Act of 2008, Public Law 
110-354, as amended, which amends Subpart 1 of Part C of Title IV of 
the Public Health Service Act by adding Section 417F, authorizing the 
establishment of the Interagency Breast Cancer and Environmental 
Research Coordinating Committee. I am also delegating the authority 
under Section 417F of the Public Health Service Act, as amended, to 
select both voting and nonvoting members of the Committee and to review 
the necessity of the Committee in the year 2011 and, thereafter, at 
least once every two years.
    This delegation shall be exercised in accordance with the 
Department's applicable policies, procedures, guidelines, and 
regulations.
    In addition, I ratified and affirmed any actions taken by the NIH 
Director or his subordinates which involved the exercise of the 
authorities delegated herein prior to the effective date of this 
delegation.
    This delegation is effective upon date of signature.

    Dated: June 23, 2009.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-15439 Filed 6-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
40 Occupational Outlook Quarterly ● Spring 1999

Steady growth in health occupations,

1986-96 and projected 1996-2006

Over the decade from 1986 to 1996, nearly 1 out of every 9 new jobs created by the

economy was in health occupations. That trend is expected to continue between 1996

and 2006.

Almost 2.3 million of the more than 20.9 million jobs added to the Nation’s work

force between 1986 and 1996 were in health diagnosing, health assessment and treating,

health technician and technologist, and health service occupations. Employment growth

of health technicians and technologists kept pace with that of health assessment and

treating occupations, both increasing over 44 percent—more than twice as fast as total

employment across all occupations. Employment in health service occupations also grew

over 40 percent, but jobs in health diagnosing occupations increased just 15 percent.

Over 2.1 million of the 18.6 million jobs projected to be added between 1996 and

2006 will be in these same health occupations. Employment in health assessment and

treating, health technicians and technologists, and health service occupations is projected to continue increasing faster than the average for all occupations. Growth in

health diagnosing occupations will lag somewhat, increasing about as fast as the average.

projected

1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 2006 1996

3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

Employment

in millions

Health technicians and technologists

Health service occupations

Health assessment and treating occupations

0.5

3.5

Health diagnosing occupations