alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of VS Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended
September 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael G. Archbold, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of VS Holdings, Inc.
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 13, 2007



/s/ Michael G. ArchboldMichael G. ArchboldChief Financial and Chief Operating Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-000064-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.R.E.T., et al., Children

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-02260

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED. 

Appellant is indigent; no costs of court are taxed in this appeal.

SIGNED July 22, 2015.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Tuesday 30th

December, 1997.

Jose Ismael Granados, Appellant,

against Record No. 0892-96-4

Claim No. 173-48-84

Windson Development Corporation/ Windson Carpenters, Inc. and American Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, Appellees.

Upon a Rehearing En Banc

Before Chief Judge Fitzpatrick,* Judges Baker, Benton, Coleman, Willis, Elder, Annunziata and Overton

Arturo Hernandez for appellant.

Dawn E. Boyce (Trichilo, Bancroft, McGavin, Horvath & Judkins, P.C., on brief), for appellees.

This cause was reviewed on rehearing en banc , and upon

consideration of the arguments of counsel and the entire record in

this case, the judgment of the Workers' Compensation Commission

rendered on April 4, 1996 is affirmed without opinion by an equally

divided court. Accordingly, the opinion previously rendered by a

panel of this Court on January 28, 1997 is withdrawn, see Granados v.

Windson Development Corporation , 24 Va. App. 80, 480 S.E.2d 150

(1997), and the mandate entered that date is vacated. The appellant

shall pay to the appellees thirty dollars damages.

This order shall be published and certified to the Virginia

Workers' Compensation Commission.____________________

*On November 19, 1997, Judge Fitzpatrick succeeded Judge Moon as chief judge.

A Copy,

Teste:

Cynthia L. McCoy, Clerk

By:

Deputy Clerk
@article{1213771,
  author = {Yuxue Liang and Yamil Simon and Pedatsur Neta and Xiaoyu (Sara) Yang and Stephen E. Stein},
  title = {CID fragmentation of deprotonated N-acyl aromatic sulfonamides. Smiles-type and nitrogen-oxygen rearrangements},
  year = {2021},
  number = {32},
  month = {2021-05-19 04:05:00},
  publisher = {Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=931526},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1021/jasms.0c00470},
  language = {en},
}
# table42_q5.3_size
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Shermen WSC Acquisition Corp.(the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|                               |                              |                                    |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                               | /s/ Francis P.  Jenkins, Jr. |
|                               |   Name:                 | Francis P.  Jenkins, Jr.           |
|                               |   Title:                | Chairman, Chief  Executive Officer and  |
|                               |                              | Director (Principal  Executive Officer) |
|                               |                              |                                    |
| Dated:   August 13, 2008 |                              |                                    |

 

----
# table41_q5.3_state
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 734 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 734

  Expressing support for the designation of the week of September 20 
     through September 26, 2020, as ``Purple Star Families Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 26, 2019

Mr. Riggleman (for himself, Mr. Scalise, Mr. Wittman, Mr. Meadows, Mr. 
    Walden, Mr. Mast, Mr. Griffith, Mr. Flores, Mr. Murphy of North 
Carolina, Mr. Rogers of Kentucky, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Latta, Mr. Long, Mr. 
Gonzalez of Ohio, Mr. Arrington, Mr. Cline, Mr. Burchett, Mr. Kelly of 
Mississippi, Mr. Joyce of Ohio, Mr. Trone, Mr. Webster of Florida, Mr. 
Cloud, Mr. Joyce of Pennsylvania, Mr. Newhouse, Mr. Steil, Mr. Taylor, 
  Mr. Rose of New York, Mr. Banks, Mr. Williams, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. 
 Walker, Mrs. Murphy of Florida, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Mitchell, Mr. 
Pence, Mr. Crenshaw, Mrs. Walorski, Mr. Steube, Mrs. Lee of Nevada, Mr. 
    Baird, Mrs. Luria, Mr. Kustoff of Tennessee, Mr. Kevin Hern of 
 Oklahoma, Mr. Balderson, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mr. Reschenthaler, Mr. 
    Biggs, Ms. Spanberger, and Mr. Massie) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for the designation of the week of September 20 
     through September 26, 2020, as ``Purple Star Families Week''.

Whereas it is recognized that wounds sustained through armed service to the 
        United States of America are both visible and invisible;
Whereas these invisible wounds are frequently undertreated and poorly healed;
Whereas the Department of Veterans Affairs has determined that an average of 
        more than 20 veterans die by suicide per day;
Whereas veterans account for a disproportionate percentage of all adult suicides 
        in the United States;
Whereas surviving family members of veterans who succumb to the invisible wounds 
        of war are often forgotten and isolated;
Whereas these family members lose their link to the support and strength of the 
        military and veteran communities after their loss;
Whereas the need for formal recognition of these families is vital to the 
        strength, health, and survival of the community of United States 
        veterans;
Whereas these families may be designated for recognition and support as ``Purple 
        Star Families''; and
Whereas the week of September 20 through September 26, 2020, is an appropriate 
        week to designate as ``Purple Star Families Week'': Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of ``Purple Star Families Week''.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE VICTOR AYALA-AGUILAR,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-71919

Agency No. A094-796-110

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 21, 2015** 

Before: CANBY, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Jose Victor Ayala-Aguilar, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro

se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reopen removal

proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. 

FILED

JUL 27 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
We review de novo questions of law and review for abuse of discretion the denial

of a motion to reopen. Salta v. INS, 314 F.3d 1076, 1078 (9th Cir. 2002). We

deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Ayala-Aguilar’s motion

to reopen and rescind his in absentia order, where the notice of hearing was mailed

to the last address he provided and he failed to provide sufficient evidence to rebut

the presumption of proper delivery of the notice of hearing. See 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1229a(b)(5)(A) (written notice is considered sufficient if sent to the most recent

address provided); Salta, 314 F.3d at 1079 (giving examples of evidence that could

be sufficient to overcome presumption of delivery). Contrary to Ayala-Aguilar’s

contention, the record indicates he was personally served with his notice to appear,

which informed him of the consequences of failing to appear and his obligation to

notify the immigration court of any address change.

The agency also did not abuse its discretion in denying as untimely AyalaAguilar’s motion to reopen to apply for relief, where he filed it more than four

years after his final order of removal and failed to assert changed country

conditions that could provide an exception to the filing deadline. See 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i)-(ii).

Contrary to Ayala-Aguilar’s contention, the BIA sufficiently articulated its

2 13-71919
 reasons for denial. See Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 2010). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

3 13-71919
No. 12-15-00129-cR

LATOSHA MCGEE § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

 Appellant §

§

vs. § 12TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee

§

§ AT TYLER, TEXAS

MOTION TO WITHDRAW

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Now comes Austin Reeve Jackson, counsel for Appellant in the above entitled and 

numbered cause, and makes this Motion to Withdraw, and for good cause shows the following:

I.

Counsel was appointed to represent Appellant in the appeal of this matter. Having

undertaken a diligent and thorough review of the record, counsel has concluded that, in his 

professional judgment, there exist no arguable grounds for reversible error. A copy of 

Appellant’s Brief filed pursuant to the requirements of Anders v. California, along with a copy of 

this Motion, has been served on Appellant who has also been informed of the right to file a pro 

se brief by 22 August, the right object to this Motion, and the right to obtain a copy of records 

from counsel. Said notification was sent to Appellant by first class certified mail at:

Inmate

Smith County Jail

206 E. Elm

Tyler, TX 75702

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, undersigned counsel respectfully prays 

that, in accordance with the applicable law, the Court grant this Motion to Withdraw and afford 

Appellant an opportunity to file a pro se brief in this matter. 

ACCEPTED

12-15-00129-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

7/23/2015 10:40:10 AM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 7/23/2015 10:40:10 AM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Austin Reeve Jackson

Texas Bar No. 24046139

112 East Line, Suite 310

Tyler, TX 75702

Telephone: (903) 595-6070

Facsimile: (866) 387-0152

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document was 

served on counsel for the State by efile. Further, a copy of this Motion was also served on 

Appellant by certified first class mail.

/s/ Austin Reeve Jackson
|   | (1) | The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: August 22, 2011 |   | /s/ William Solko                      |   |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                   |   | William Solko, Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                   |   | and Chief Financial Officer            |   |
|                   |   |                                   |   |

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofBuckeye GP Holdings L.P. (“BGH”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I,Keith E. St.Clair, Chief Financial Officer ofMainLine Management LLC, the general partner of BGH, hereby certify, to myknowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of BGH.

 

 
|                      | MAINLINE  MANAGEMENT LLC, as general partner of BGH |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                      |                                                |
| Date:  July 31, 2009 | /s/ KEITH E.  ST.CLAIR                              |
|                      |                                                |
|                      | Keith E.  St.Clair                                  |
|                      | *Chief  Financial Officer*                          |

 

----
NO. 12-14-00323-CV

IN THE

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

___________________________________________________________________

DAVID TUBB, ET AL. APPELLANTS

V.

ASPECT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. APPELLEES

__________________________________________________________________

UNOPPOSED SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE BRIEF OF APPELLEES

Appellees, Aspect International, Inc. and James Michael Sterling, request a thirty (30)

day extension of the deadline for filing their brief, pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 10.

1. August 7, 2015, is the current deadline for filing Appellees’ brief.

2. A thirty (30) day extension is requested.

3. The following facts are relied on to reasonably explain the need for an

extension. Keith Dollahite (the “attorney”) has not had adequate time to review the record,

research the law, and prepare a brief. 

July 15 The attorney received notice that Appellees’ brief was due on August

7, 2015.

July 16 The attorney attended an out-of-state meeting.

July 17 The attorney attended an out-of-state meeting.

July 18 Saturday. 

1

ACCEPTED

12-14-00323-CV

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

7/23/2015 1:19:21 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 7/23/2015 1:19:21 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
July 19 Sunday. The attorney reviewed a contract and lease agreement for a

potential new transaction; and reviewed incoming correspondence and

pleadings from the prior few days.

July 20 The attorney prepared the Appellees’ brief in Morrison Supply Co.,

Inc., et al. v. Hilburn, et al., No. 12-15-00141-CV, in the 12 Court of

th

Appeals, Tyler, Texas.

July 21 The attorney prepared the Appellees’ brief in Morrison Supply Co.,

Inc., et al. v. Hilburn, et al., No. 12-15-00141-CV, in the 12 Court of

th

Appeals, Tyler, Texas.

July 22 The attorney prepared the Appellees’ brief in Morrison Supply Co.,

Inc., et al. v. Hilburn, et al., No. 12-15-00141-CV, in the 12 Court of

th

Appeals, Tyler, Texas.

July 23 The attorney prepared the Appellees’ brief in Morrison Supply Co.,

Inc., et al. v. Hilburn, et al., No. 12-15-00141-CV, in the 12 Court of

th

Appeals, Tyler, Texas.

July 24-

August 2 The attorney is scheduled for a pre-planned, out-of-state family

vacation.

4. The attorney plans to complete the Appellees’ brief within the thirty (30) days

of the current deadline, or September 8, 2015.

5. This is Appellees’ second request for an extension of this deadline.

WHEREFORE, Appellees, Aspect International, Inc. and James Michael Sterling,

request the Court to grant this motion.

2
Respectfully submitted,

M. KEITH DOLLAHITE, P.C.

5457 Donnybrook Avenue

Tyler, Texas 75703

(903) 581-2110

(903) 581-2113 (Facsimile)

/s/ Keith Dollahite

By:______________________________________

M. Keith Dollahite

State Bar No. 05958550

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Before filing this motion, Greg Smith, the attorney for Appellants, was contacted

about this motion, and he indicated he does not oppose this motion.

/s/ Keith Dollahite

________________________________________

3
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Solera NationalBancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30,2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)   The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                              | SOLERA NATIONAL  BANCORP, INC.                |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:  August 13, 2010 |                                               |
|                              |                                               |
|                              | By:                                                | /s/ Douglas Crichfield |
|                              | Douglas Crichfield                                 |
|                              | President & Chief  Executive Officer      |
|                              | (Principal Executive  Officer)                     |
|                              |                                               |
| Dated:  August 13, 2010 |                                               |
|                              |                                               |
|                              | By:                                                | /s/ Robert J. Fenton |
|                              | Robert J. Fenton                                   |
|                              | Executive Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer |
|                              | (Principal Accounting and  Financial Officer)      |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Solera National Bancorp, Inc.and will be retained by Solera National Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
36 Occupational Outlook Quarterly.Fall 2003

To earn more, think big. Data from the Bureau of Labor

Statistics (BLS) Quarterly Census of Employment and

Wages program show that, generally, the larger the

establishment in which people worked, the more they

were paid. One exception was for the smallest establishments, where workers earned somewhat more per week

than did those in some slightly larger establishments. This

stems, in part, from higher earnings in small establishments in the wholesale trade, information, and arts,

entertainment, and recreation industries.

As the chart illustrates, workers employed in the largest

class of establishments averaged $450 to $500 more per

week than did those employed in the smallest. But small

establishments—those with fewer than 100 employees—

outnumber large ones. An establishment is defined as an

institution that produces goods or services, usually in a

single physical location, such as a factory or a store.

The data are from January to March 2002 and cover

98 percent of all U.S. jobs: those that fall under unemployment-insurance laws. For more information, contact

the BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages

(QCEW) Program, 2 Massachusetts Ave. NE., Room

4840, Washington, DC 20212-0001; (202) 691-6567;

www.bls.gov/cew.

Average weekly earnings

by size of establishment,

 2002 first quarter

1,000 or more employees

20 to 49 employees

10 to 19 employees

5 to 9 employees

Fewer than 5 employees

500 to 999 employees

250 to 499 employees

100 to 249 employees

50 to 99 employees

$1,072

616

585

559

614

882

799

719

666
# table133_q14.6_naics
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DCP Holding
Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of the Company, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Anthony A. Cook        
|Principal Executive Officer
|                           
|November 11, 2009          
|                           
|/s/ Robert C. Hodgkins, Jr.
|Principal Financial Officer
|                           
|November 11, 2009          

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.