alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The State, Joseph Roth et al., prosecutors, *vs.*Henry J. Yauger et al.

The surveyors of the highways should certify in their return of a road that they had regard to the shortest distance, or the presumption will be that they had not.

*Certiorari*to Hunterdon Pleas in matter of road.

Argued before Justices Ogden, Haines, and Vredenburgh.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Vredenburgh, J.

One of the reasons assigned for setting aside this return is, that the surveyors have omitted to certify in their return that they had regard to the shortest distance.

The statute, *(Nix. Dig.*702, § 5,) expressly enacts that when surveyors of the highways shall lay out, vacate, or alter a public road they shall have regard to the shortest distance.

This was an application to *alter*the old road leading from *Easton to New*Brunswick, in the township of Clinton, in the county of Hunterdon. They vacated 25 chains of it, and relaid it, as they say, by laying another road, departing from and never returning into the old road hauling from Easton to New Brunswick, except by another already laid-out road. Now it should appear upon the face of the return that, in so altering this road, the surveyors had regard to the shortest distance, *(State*v. *Lippincott,*1 *Dutcher*434,) or the presumption is raised that they disregarded it.

But that in this instance the surveyors had no regard to the shortest distance does not rest upon a mere presumption; the surveyors could not by possibility have had regard to the shortest distance. The part of the old road leading from Easton to New Brunswick vacated is a *385straight lino, of tho length of about 25 chains; but to and from the same points by the road, as altered, it is at least, 35 chains, or, in other words, to get from Easton to New Brunswick by the road, as altered, one would have to travel 10 chains lurt,her than before. As appears by the map appended to the return, the part vacated was the hypothenuse of a right angled triangle, and the road, as shortened by the surveyors, was the other two sides. And the surveyors have neglected to append to their return a demonstration, that the two sides of a triangle are shorter than the remaining side. It is apparent that the surveyors have omitted to certify that they had regard to the shortest distance intentionally, and because they could not do so with truth, that the alteration was made to accommodate some local interest, in total disregard of the shortest distance.,

Eet the return be set aside.

Cited *in State*v. *Essex Public Road Board,*8 *Vr.*275.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 3, 2014

No. 04-12-00630-CV

THE HUFF ENERGY FUND, L.P., WRH Energy Partners, L.L.C., William R."Bill" Huff, 

Rick D'Angelo, Ed Dartley, Bryan Bloom, and Riley-Huff Energy Group, LLC,

Appellants

v.

LONGVIEW ENERGY COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Zavala County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-09-12583-ZCVAJA

Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The clerk’s record in this appeal was filed August 8, 2013. On September 30, 2014, 

appellants filed an unopposed motion asking this court to order the district clerk to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record. In the motion, appellants contend that they and appellee filed 

requests for supplemental records with the district clerk’s office months ago, but the requested 

supplemental records were never filed despite numerous telephone calls and assurances from the 

district clerk that the requested supplemental records would be filed. 

Accordingly, we GRANT appellants’ motion and ORDER the District Clerk of Zavala 

County to file a supplemental clerk’s record in accordance with Appellants’ “Third Request for 

Supplemental Matters to be Included in the Clerk’s Record,” which was filed December 2, 2013, 

and with appellee’s April 7, 2014 letter request. We ORDER the district clerk to file the 

supplemental record containing the specified documents in this court on or before October 13, 

2014. 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel and the 

District Clerk of Zavala County. 
It is so ORDERED on October 3, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 33-04295, No. 33-43898 and No. 333-11039) pertaining to the
Incentive Stock Option Plan of Westcorp, the Westcorp 1991 Incentive Stock
Option Plan and the Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership and Salary Savings Plan,
respectively, and in the related prospectus of our report dated February 9,
1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Westcorp included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.
 
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Los Angeles, California
March 12, 1998
Exhibit 31.1

              SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


I, D. Scott Wilkerson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BNP Residential
Properties, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting.



February 23, 2004                        /s/ D. Scott Wilkerson
                                     ---------------------------------------
                                     D. Scott Wilkerson
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       66
<PAGE>
|   | • | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | • | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      combined predecessors of thePartnership. |
|--------|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 9, 2009 | /s/ JOHN B. WALKER                                 |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                        | John      B. Walker                                |
|                        | Chief      Executive Officer of EV Management LLC, |
|                        | general      partner of EV Energy GP, L.P.,        |
|                        | general      partner of EV Energy Partners,L.P.    |

----
(More)

No. 22-1 For Immediate Release

January 2022

RRB Appoints Director of Equal Opportunity

The U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) has named Shiri Ndang as its Director of 

Equal Opportunity, effective January 17, 2022.

Ms. Ndang has over 20 years of experience in Federal labor and employment law, 

providing guidance, advisory and representational services to executives, managers and 

supervisors, at both the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Social 

Security Administration (SSA).

As the Director, she will oversee the activities and responsibilities of the RRB’s Office of 

Equal Opportunity (OEO), which include management of affirmative action, diversity, and equal 

employment opportunity programs. In addition to protecting the rights of RRB employees and 

increasing the diversity of the agency workforce, the OEO handles questions and complaints 

about alleged discrimination on the basis of disability in the RRB’s benefit programs. She will 

report directly to the agency’s three-member Board.

Ms. Ndang started her Federal career in 1993 as an intern at the EEOC headquarters in 

Washington, D.C. She became an investigator in 1995, working out of the agency’s New York 

District Office, and subsequently transferred to the New Orleans District Office, where she 

worked as an investigator and supervisory investigator from 1997 to 2003.

In 2003, she transferred to SSA, serving as an attorney-advisor to the Regional Chief 

Administrative Law Judge in Dallas, Texas, the position she held at the time of her RRB 

appointment. As an attorney-advisor, she assisted management with contract interpretation, union 

negotiations, conflict resolution, employee and labor relations, equal employment opportunity, 

and disciplinary actions. She is also a Federal certified mediator, serving as a member of the 

Dallas-Fort Worth Federal Executive Board’s mediation cadre since 2005.

Ms. Ndang received her Juris Doctor degree from Loyola University New Orleans in 2002. 

She also earned a Master’s of Public Administration (1993) with a public policy concentration, 

and a Bachelor of Arts (1991) in political science, both from Southern University in Baton Rouge, 

Louisiana.

Born in the western African country of Cameroon, Ms. Ndang was raised there and in New 

Orleans. At the time of her appointment, she resided in the Dallas-Fort Worth area with her 

husband, Emmanuel. They are the parents of two adult children.

U.S. Railroad Retirement Board

RRB News

844 North Rush Street Chicago, Illinois 60611-1275

RRB.gov

General Information: 877-772-5772

Public Affairs

Media Inquiries: opa@rrb.gov

312-751-4777
-2-

She replaces Pamela Tate, the Director of Equal Opportunity since 2018, who retired in 

September 2021 with more than 36 years of RRB service.

# # #

An independent Federal agency headquartered in Chicago, the RRB pays more than

$13.3 billion a year in benefits under the Federal Railroad Retirement and Railroad 

Unemployment Insurance Acts covering the nation’s railroad workers and their families.
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 02-14-00041-CR OFFENSE: 1

Dezmone Pinkston v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Tarrant

HVM -/r

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: Criminal District Court No. 3

DATE: 03/19/15 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 1329761D

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Dezmone Pinkston v. The S

STYLE: Texas

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

tate of

Petition CCA Disposition:

DATE:

R&F^tzD JUDGE:

DATE: O^/Zfllf SIGNED: PC:

JUDGE: f^A. LMsl^X PUBLISH: DNP:

'

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
# table192_q19.2_size
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1048

GLENN A. FROEMAN,

Petitioner,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; RODNEY E. SLATER, in

his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of

Transportation; JANE F. GARVEY, in her official capacity as acting Administrator, Federal

Highway Administration,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of

Transportation.

Submitted: February 27, 1998 Decided: April 3, 1998

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Glenn A. Froeman, Petitioner Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United

States Attorney, Perry F. Sekus, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2
3

PER CURIAM:

Glenn Allen Froeman filed a "Petition to enjoin a U.S. regulation" requesting that this court enjoin Respondents from enforcing 49 C.F.R. § 392.5(a)(1), (2) (1997). Froeman asserts that

§ 392.5(a)(1), (2) violates the Constitution. We deny the petition.

Because Froeman's petition requests that this court prevent

federal officials from taking certain actions, this petition may be

construed as a petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402

(1976). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden

of showing he has "no other adequate means" to attain the relief he

desires, and that his right to such relief is "clear and indisputable." Allied Chem. Corp. v. Diaflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980)

(citations omitted).

The writ of prohibition is also an extraordinary remedy which

should issue only when the petitioner's right to the remedy is

clear and indisputable, see In re Vargas, 723 F.2d 1461, 1468 (10th

Cir. 1983), and when the petitioner has no other adequate means of

relief. See In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987).

We deny Froeman's petition because he does not present extraordinary circumstances that require granting either writ. He fails

to show that his right to relief is clear and indisputable or that

he has exhausted all available means of relief. To the extent that
4

Froeman seeks to appeal an administrative action, his action is

time-barred and this court is without jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2344 (1994). We deny Froeman's "Application for Leave to Adduse

[sic] Additional Evidence." We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED
# Mental Health Minute: Bipolar Disorder in Adults

November 26, 2021

## Transcript

(Music)Narrator: Got 60 seconds? Take a mental health minute to learn about bipolar disorder in adults. 

Everyone goes through ups and downs in life, but for people with bipolar disorder, these mood swings can reach extremes. Symptoms of bipolar disorder include drastic changes in mood, energy, activity level, ability to concentrate, and sleep needs. 

For many people, bipolar disorder usually doesn't go away on its own. If you have symptoms, talk with a health care provider. With medication and therapy, things can get better. 

To learn more about bipolar disorder, visit the NIMH website. And if you found this mental health minute helpful, please share it.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 6, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135788 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. MARC HERSCHFUS, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff/Counter Defendant- Justices Appellant,

v SC: 135788 COA: 278016 Oakland CC: 2002-665043-DM TONYA HERSCHFUS,Defendant/Counter PlaintiffAppellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the trial court for entry of an order setting a parenting time schedule that accommodates the plaintiff's religious observances in accordance with the parties' agreement regarding the ch ild's upbringing. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C ORRIGAN , J., dissents and states as follows:

In this highly acrimonious child-custody case, I would deny leave to appeal rather than remand the case to the tria l court to set a new parenting- time schedule. This tragic record reflects that both parties have used this litigation as a tool to mount continuing, ugly attacks on one another. The ir destructive behavior has s erved only to prolong this case to the obvious detriment of their son. I urge that, in lieu of continuing their harmful behavior, the parties on remand be have in the best interest of their son. I fear that our remand order provides a platform for these p arties to lob their grievances against one another yet again.

W EAVER , J., joins the statement of C ORRIGAN , J.

l0603 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 6, 2008

Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

ALEXANDER BRAURMAN,

Plaintiff

 V. SUMMONS IN A CIVIL CASE

GC SERVICES, LLP,

Defendant

CASE NUMBER: 2:10−CV−06376−KSH −PS

 TO: (Name and address of Defendant):

 A lawsuit has been filed against you.

 Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) −− or 60 days if

you are the United States or a United States Agency, or an office or employee of the United States described in

Fed. R. civ. P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) −− you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a

motion under rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the

plaintiff or plaintiff`s attorney, whose name and address are:

 If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the

complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

WILLIAM T. WALSH

 CLERK

 DIANNE C. RICHARDS

 (By) DEPUTY CLERK

ISSUED ON 2010−12−13 13:25:14.0, Clerk

USDC NJD

Case 2:10-cv-06376-KSH -PS Document 2 Filed 12/13/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 12
RETURN OF SERVICE

 Service of the Summons and complaint was made by me (1) DATE

 NAME OF SERVER (PRINT) TITLE

 Check one box below to indicate appropriate method of service

Served personally upon the defendant. Place where served: _______________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

Left copies thereof at the defendant's dwelling house or usual place of abode with a person of suitable age and

discretion then residing therein.

Name of person with whom the summons and complaint were left:__________________________________

Returned unexecuted:_____________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

Other (specify) :_________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF SERVICE FEES

 TRAVEL SERVICES TOTAL

DECLARATION OF SERVER

 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

contained in the Return of Service and Statement of Service Fees is true and correct.

Executed on ___________________ _______________________________________

Date Signature of Server

_______________________________________

Address of Server

Case 2:10-cv-06376-KSH -PS Document 2 Filed 12/13/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 13
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 19, 2023

NO. 03

- 21

- 00420

- CV

Rosa Santis , Appellant

v.

Together We Rise Corporation , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRN E, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by th e tr i a l court on May 27, 20 21

. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. The appellant

shall pay all costs relating to this appe al, both in this Court and in the court below.
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



## 137291 Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
J ustices



## v SC: 137291 COA: 285733 Saginaw CC: 99-017250-FH BERNARD WILLIAM KADE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 25, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s1117 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2008

Clerk
44 Occupational Outlook Quarterly ● Summer 1999

Percentage of full-time workers

receiving selected benefits, 1997

Paid vacations, life and health insurance, and retirement packages

were the most common benefits provided in 1997 to full-time

employees in medium and large establishments—those with 100 or

more workers. In addition, employers provided most workers with

job-related educational assistance and other assistance programs such

as counseling services for alcoholism, drug abuse, and emotional and

financial problems.

Less prevalent were benefits including child-care assistance, flexible

workplace, paid family leave, and insurance for long-term care.

Paid

vacations

Life

insurance

Retirement Medical care

insurance

Job-related

educational

assistance

Employee

assistance

programs

Dental care

insurance

Child-care

assistance

Long-term

care

insurance

Paid

family

leave

Flexible

workplace

Percentage of full-time employees participating in selected benefit programs, medium

and large private establishments, 1997

95

87

79

76

67

61 59

10

7

2 2