alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 15-10628

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cv-02819-CEH-EAJ

CARLOS RAMIREZ,

JASMAINE RODRIGUEZ RAMIREZ,

 Plaintiffs - Appellees,

versus

GRADY JUDD, 

Sheriff of Polk County, in his official capacity,

WARNER ANTHONY BURGESS,

in his individual capacity,

 Defendants – Appellants,

PAUL ALLEN MCLEOD,

in individual capacity,

Defendant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(July 28, 2015)

Case: 15-10628 Date Filed: 07/28/2015 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal stems from a citizen-police encounter. Defendant Burgess, an 

officer in the Polk County, Florida, Sheriff’s Office, contends that the District 

Court erred in denying him qualified immunity as to plaintiff Carlos Ramirez’s 

claim, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, that Burgess used excessive force in 

violation of the Fourth Amendment1 in arresting him on the night of July 28, 2010. 

We disagree. Taking the evidence in the record in the light most favorable to 

Ramirez, we conclude that a reasonable jury could find that Burgess used 

excessive force as Ramirez contends. 

AFFIRMED.2

 1

 The Fourth Amendment right against “unreasonable searches and seizures” is 

applicable to the States and local governments. See Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S. Ct. 1684, 

6 L. Ed. 2d 1081 (1961).

2

 Defendant Judd asks us to exercise pendant appellate jurisdiction and reverse the 

District Court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment on Ramirez’s state tort law claims of 

assault and battery. We decline his request. 

Case: 15-10628 Date Filed: 07/28/2015 Page: 2 of 2
No. 18-3 For Immediate Release

March 2018 

RRB Names Chief Financial Officer

The U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) has appointed Shawna R. Weekley as its Chief 

Financial Officer.

At the time of her appointment, Ms. Weekley was the RRB’s Deputy Chief Financial 

Officer, having served in that capacity since January 2017. Before then, she was with the U.S. 

Department of Energy (DOE) for 14 years in a series of increasingly responsible positions. Most 

recently, she had served as Director of Accounting and Finance for the DOE’s Office of Science in 

Chicago, based at Argonne National Laboratory, since April 2010. 

As the RRB’s Chief Financial Officer, Ms. Weekley will be responsible for the agency’s 

financial management, including oversight of its Bureau of Fiscal Operations. She will also serve as 

a member of the RRB Executive Committee, which is responsible for day-to-day operations and 

development of policy recommendations to the agency’s three-member Board.

Before entering Federal service in January 2002, Ms. Weekley was a Senior Associate in the 

Audit Division for KPMG, LLP, in Chicago. She received a bachelor of science degree in 

accountancy from the University of Illinois (1999), and is also a certified public accountant.

Originally from Champaign, Illinois, Ms. Weekley currently lives in Oak Forest, Illinois, 

with her husband Veeta Weekley, who is also a Federal employee with the Internal Revenue 

Service. They are the parents of a son, age 13, and a daughter, age 11. 

# # # 

An independent Federal agency based in Chicago, the RRB pays almost $12.5 billion a year 

in benefits under the Federal Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts 

covering the nation’s railroad workers and their families.

U.S. Railroad Retirement Board

RRB News

844 North Rush Street Chicago, Illinois 60611-1275

www.rrb.gov

877-772-5772 general information

Public Affairs

312-751-4777 

opa@rrb.gov media inquiries
RE: Case No. 15-0529 DATE

COA #: 12-13-00379-CV TC#: 12-2467-

STYLE:MARTHA N. HILL AND GARY HILL

v. WINNON EARL SWORD

Today the Supreme Court of Texas receiv

filed a motion for extension of time to file 

for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in the a

numbered and styled case.

MS. CATHY S. LUSK

CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OF 

1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 

TYLER, TX 75702
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1367

In re: SHAHEEN CABBAGESTALK,

 Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(No. 5:14-cv-03771-RMG-KDW)

Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: July 27, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shaheen Cabbagestalk, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shaheen Cabbagestalk petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking 

an order directing the dismissal of state criminal indictments

against him. We conclude that Cabbagestalk is not entitled to 

mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only 

in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 

U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 

516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available 

only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. 

In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 

1988).

Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re 

Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). Further, 

this court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief 

against state officials, Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg 

Cnty., 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969), and does not have 

jurisdiction to review final state court orders, Dist. of Columbia 

Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983). 

The relief sought by Cabbagestalk is not available by way of 

mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 
3

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 981 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 981

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 27, 2020.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 6172) to amend the Foreign Intelligence 
Surveillance Act of 1978 to prohibit the production of certain business records, 
and for other purposes, with the Senate amendments thereto, and to consider in 
the House, without intervention of any point of order, a single motion offered 
by the chair of the Committee on the Judiciary or his designee that the House 
concur in the Senate amendments. The Senate amendments and the motion shall be 
considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided 
among and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on the Judiciary and the chair and ranking minority member of the Permanent 
Select Committee on Intelligence. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the motion to its adoption without intervening motion or demand for 
division of the question.
    Sec. 2.  Any motion pursuant to clause 4 of rule XXII relating to H.R. 6172 
may be offered only by the Majority Leader or his designee.
    Sec. 3.  Notwithstanding the order of the House of May 22, 2020, if a veto 
message is laid before the House on House Joint Resolution 76, then after the 
message is read and the objections of the President are spread at large upon the 
Journal, further consideration of the veto message and the joint resolution 
shall be postponed until the legislative day of Wednesday, July 1, 2020; and on 
that legislative day, the House shall proceed to the constitutional question of 
reconsideration and dispose of such question without intervening motion.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
An unpublisHfed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

AYRICK TALBO, No. 67748
Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT FILED
OF FAMILY SERVICES,

Respondent. JUL 27 2015

TRACIE K. LINDEMAN
CLERK, OF SUPREME COURT

Y .
® DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

On June 15, 2015, this court entered an order denying without
prejudice appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The order
instructed appellant to first seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the
district court. Further, the order cautioned appellant that failure to
properly seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court or to
pay the filing fee within 30 days would result in the dismissal of this
appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise
communicated with this court. Accordingly, cause appearing, this appeal

is dismissed.

It is so ORDERED.

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT
TRACIE K. LINDEMAN

py: ou ¥ diol

cc: Hon. Sandra L. Pomrenze, District Judge, Family Court Division
Ayrick Talbo
Clark County District Attorney

‘Suenene/ COURT Eighth District Court Clerk

OF
NEVADA

CLERK’S ORDER

(ovis p> 15 -22647
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-H  ("Issuer") for the period
ending  September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 8th day of January, 2003.

                                   GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                   PARTNERSHIP II-H
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Alliance Machine & Specialties , Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00022

- CV

Trial court case number: 2019

- 79056

Trial court: 234th District Court of Harris County

Relator, Alliance Machine & Special ties, Inc., filed a “ Motion for Temporary Relief to

Stay Underlying Proceedings

. ” The mot ion is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___________ /s/ Julie Countiss

__________ Acting individually

Date: A pril 1, 2021
@misc{1209181,
  author = {Matthew Connolly and May Ling Martin and Zack Buck and Newell Moser and Enrico Lucon and Damian Lauria and Peter Bradley and Andrew Slifka and Robert Amaro},
  title = {Determining Steel Weld Qualification and Performance for Hydrogen Pipelines: Phase I Report},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-05-23 04:05:00},
  publisher = {PHMSA Research and Development Program},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936717},
  language = {en},
}
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Anthony S. Shalom, Chief Executive Officer of Intcomex, Inc. (the Company), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2009



/s/ Anthony S. ShalomAnthony S. ShalomChief Executive Officer(Chairman of the Board of Directors)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CAUSE NO. 14-15-00186-CV 

 ____________________________________________________________ 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

 _____________________________________________________________ 

 IN THE INTEREST OF W.J.B. & J.B. 

 _______________________________________________ ______________ 

 From the 311th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas 

 Cause No. 2009-23300 

 MOTION FOR EXTENSION TO FILE NOTICE OF APPEAL 

1. This is an accelerated appeal in a parental termination case. 

2. On July 16, 2015, this Court notified appellate counsel that a notice of appeal 

had been filed within a time period in which a motion for extension needed to 

be filed. Accordingly, the undersigned appellate counsel files the motion for 

extension of time in which to file a notice of appeal. 

3. Counsel asks this Honorable Court to grant a motion for extension of time to 

file a notice of appeal because of the serious issues involved in this case and 

because a motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when the 

perfecting instrument is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. 

Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Moreover, appellant parent has a 

reasonable explanation to support the late filing. 

ACCEPTED

14-15-00186-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/27/2015 10:45:43 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/27/2015 10:45:43 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
4. The filing of the notice of appeal within this timeframe was due to trial 

counsel’s understanding of the time period in which to file a notice of appeal, 

and communication with appellate counsel with regard to the filing of a notice 

of appeal. 

5. Appellate counsel asks that this Honorable Court grant this motion.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Lana Shadwick

Lana Shadwick 

State Bar No. 00784951

12535 Kingsride, Ste. 313

Houston, Texas 77024

Telephone: (713) 392-8222

Lana@LanaShadwick.com

 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Appellant has notified opposing counsel and there is no opposition to this 

motion.

/s/ Lana Shadwick

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

instrument was forwarded to Asst. Harris County Attorney Sandra Hachem on the 

27th day of July, 2015 by electronic mail.

/s/ Lana Shadwick
**EXHIBIT24**

 

OWENS-ILLINOISGROUP, INC.

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESEPRESENTS: That each individual whose signature appears below hereby consents toand appoints James W. Baehren as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agentwith all power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, inany and all capacities, to sign the 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K ofOwens-Illinois Group, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under thelaws of the State of Delaware, and any and all amendments thereto, and to filethe same, with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection therewith,with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the requirements of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agentfull power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the same as fully to allintents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying andconfirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitute orsubstitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, eachof the undersigned has hereunto set his hand on the date set opposite his name.

 
| **Signature**                    | ** ** | **Title**                                                | ** ** | **Date**                |
|----------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------|
|                             |       |                                                     |       |                    |
|  /s/ L. Richard  Crawford   |       | Director                                                 |       | February 29,  2008 |
| L. Richard Crawford              |       |                                                     |       |                    |
|                             |       |                                                     |       |                    |
|  /s/ Albert P.L.  Stroucken |       | Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer                    |       | February 29,  2008 |
| Albert P.L. Stroucken            |       | (Principal Executive  Officer)                           |       |                    |
|                             |       |                                                     |       |                    |
|  /s/ Edward C. White        |       | President (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer); |       | February 29,  2008 |
| Edward C. White                  |       | Director                                                 |       |                    |
|                             |       |                                                     |       |                    |
|  /s/ James W. Baehren       |       | Vice President and  Secretary; Director                  |       | February 29,  2008 |
| James W. Baehren                 |       |                                                     |       |                    |

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00380-CR

Joshua Allen SCHOPPMAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR0691

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED July 22, 2015.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
H. Res. 725 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 21, 2019. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM: Mrs. Carolyn 

B. Maloney of New York, Chair. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report of All American Pet Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Barry Schwartz, Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



| | Date: October 2, 2012                     
| | ------------------------------------------
| |                                           
| | /S/ Barry Schwartz                        
| | Barry Schwartz                            
| | CEO and                                   
| | Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
| |
# table15a_q5_size_class

# table15b_q5_size_class

# table15c_q5_size_class
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Roderick King, Appellant

No. 06-14-00166-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 188th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 43416-

A). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Roderick King, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 21, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
No. 01-15-00317-CR

IN THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

AT HOUSTON, TEXAS

ANDREAS MARCOPOULOS, Appellant

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District of 

 Harris County Texas 

Trial Court No. 1440970

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS:

CARMEN ROE hereby files this appearance of counsel to accompany 

ROBB FICKMAN as attorney of record for defendant ANDREAS 

MARCOPOULOS.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

/s/ Carmen Roe

______________________________

CARMEN ROE

TBA: 24048773

440 LOUISIANA, SUITE 900

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002

713.236.7755

713.236.7756 FAX

CARMEN@CARMENROE.COM

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

ACCEPTED

01-15-00317-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/21/2015 12:56:52 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/21/2015 12:56:52 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 9.5(d), a copy of this document was served on 

Harris County District Attorney, Appellate Division; 1201 Franklin, Houston, 

Texas 77002 on this the 21st day of July 2015. 

/s/ Carmen Roe

______________________________

CARMEN ROE