alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Northeast Automotive Holdings, Inc.,
      (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
      2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), I, William Solko, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32, fully
                complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
                Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant





Dated: November 14 , 2008
            /s/ William SolkoWilliam Solko, Chief Executive Officer and
              Chief Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be
      retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





This
      certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
      by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of
      1933
      or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date
      of
      the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language
      contained in such filing.
Program 

Letter

United States 

Railroad Retirement Board

Office of Programs

Quality Reporting Service Center

Email: QRSC@rrb.gov 

Phone: (312) 751-4992

 Fax: (312) 751-7123

Letter No. 2023-01 Date: October 14, 2022

TO: Service & Compensation Contact Officials

SUBJECT: IMPORTANT – RUIA Experience Rating Contribution Information 

Please share this notice with all individuals within your organization who may need the 

information in connection with their work.

In accordance, with section 345.301 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the Railroad Retirement 

Board is required to provide each employer with the information necessary for you to pay your 

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA) contributions for the following calendar year, no later 

than October 15th of each year. 

Regretfully, both the electronic and paper version of the Form ID-40R/S, Annual Notice to Employers

– Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, will be delayed. The notice, which provides each employer 

an individual breakdown of how their individual employer contribution rate under the RUIA was 

calculated for the years 2020- 2022, will be released by mid-November2022. 

If you are not the person in your organization who should receive the contribution rates and earnings 

base notices, please share this information with the appropriate members of your staff who are 

responsible for filing service and compensation reporting forms for employees of your organization. 

Should you have any questions or concerns please contact the Quality Reporting Service Center by 

phone at (312) 751-4992 or by e-mail at qrsc@rrb.gov. 

Director of Policy and Systems
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 945 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 945

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                           May 1, 2020.
    Resolved, That House Resolution 891, agreed to March 11, 2020 (as most 
recently amended by House Resolution 920, agreed to April 14, 2020), is amended 
in section 7 by striking ``May 3, 2020'' and inserting ``May 18, 2020''.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Fisk Building Associates L.L.C., Respondent, v Sato Construction Co. Inc., Doing Business as Flag Waterproofing & Restoration Co., Defendant, and Alfred Karman, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 448]

from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.), entered April 18, 2005, unanimously dismissed pursuant to the terms of the stipulation of settlement of the parties hereto. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Tom, J.E, Saxe, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 2299

JAMES D. SULLIVAN , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court . ( T ax C t . No. 11738

- 20L )

Submitted : April 26, 2022 Decided: April 28, 2022

Before AGEE and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

James D. Sullivan , Appellant Pro Se. Lauren E. Hume , Jacob Earl Christensen , Regina Sherry Moriarty , Tax Division, U NITED S TATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

James D. Sullivan appeals from the tax court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner and allowing the proposed levy action to proceed
. We have
reviewed the recor d and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the tax court

. Sullivan v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue , Tax Ct. No. 11738

- 20L ( U.S. Tax Ct. Aug. 4, 2 021 ) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

____________________________________

:

MALLINCKRODT INC., :

:

Plaintiff, : Civil Action No. 10-6424 (FSH)

:

v. :

:

WATSON LABORATORIES, INC.- :

FLORIDA, ET AL., : ORDER ON INFORMAL APPLICATION

:

Defendants. :

____________________________________:

This matter having come before the Court by way of submission dated March 22, 2011,

regarding the defendants’ request for leave to file a motion to "lift the thirty month stay";

and the Court having reviewed the docket;

and it appearing that the defendant has filed an Answer and that a conference pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 shall be convened;

and it appearing that the instant request should be raised during the Rule 16 conference as

it can be discussed in the context of other pretrial proceedings and the status of the proceedings

before the FDA;

IT IS THEREFORE ON THIS 22nd day of March, 2011

ORDERED that the request for leave to file a motion to lift the "thirty-month stay" is

denied without prejudice and may be renewed at the Rule 16 conference; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there shall be a Rule 16 conference on April 7, 2011 at

11:00 a.m. A separate order setting forth the requirements for the conference will be issued.

s/Patty Shwartz 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:10-cv-06424-FSH -PS Document 29 Filed 03/22/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 231
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 86 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 86

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      February 7, 2019.
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR EXPENSES OF SELECT COMMITTEES.

    (a) Select Committee on the Climate Crisis.--
            (1) Payment of expenses.--There shall be paid out of the applicable 
        accounts of the House of Representatives not more than $70,000 for the 
        expenses of the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis established under 
        section 104(f) of House Resolution 6, as agreed to January 9, 2019, to 
        be available during the period beginning at noon on January 1, 2019, and 
        ending on March 31, 2019.
            (2) Vouchers.--Payments under this subsection shall be made on 
        vouchers authorized by the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, 
        signed by the chair of the Select Committee, and approved in the manner 
        directed by the Committee on House Administration.
    (b) Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress.--
            (1) Payment of expenses.--There shall be paid out of the applicable 
        accounts of the House of Representatives not more than $50,000 for the 
        expenses of the Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress 
        established under title II of House Resolution 6, as agreed to January 
        9, 2019, to be available during the period beginning at noon on January 
        1, 2019, and ending on March 31, 2019.
            (2) Vouchers.--Payments under this subsection shall be made on 
        vouchers authorized by the Select Committee on the Modernization of 
        Congress, signed by the chair of the Select Committee, and approved in 
        the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.
    (c) Regulations.--Amounts made available under this resolution shall be 
expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Order entered July 24, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01575-CV

WILLIAM T. DICKSON, Appellant

V.

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY AND FELLERS SNIDER BLANKENSHIP BAILEY & 

TIPPENS, P.C., Appellees

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC 12-02048

ORDER

We GRANT appellee BNSF Railway Company’s July 22, 2015 unopposed third motion 

for extension of time to file brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than August 21, 2015. 

No further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Case 2:10-cr-00851-CCC Document 97 Filed 03/23/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 637
Case 2:10-cr-00851-CCC Document 97 Filed 03/23/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 638
Case 2:10-cr-00851-CCC Document 97 Filed 03/23/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 639
S05A0728.

#### PERKINS v. THE STATE.

(614 SE2d 92)

Fletcher, Chief Justice.

The question in this case is whether a criminal defendant’s prior conviction by a court lacking subject matter jurisdiction bars retrial of that defendant in a court having subject matter jurisdiction. We hold that it does not, and therefore affirm the superior court.

This is the second time this case has been before this Court.1 On November 2, 2000, William Thomas Perkins was involved in an automobile collision that resulted in the death of Brenda Crider. Perkins was cited for reckless driving, and pled guilty to this offense in Whitfield County Probate Court. The probate court imposed a three-month probated sentence, which Perkins served. He also paid fines totaling $184 and his driver’s license was suspended for six months. Perkins was subsequently indicted for felony vehicular homicide and for the same reckless driving offense in Whitfield County Superior Court.

*507Decided June 6, 2005

Reconsideration denied June 30, 2005.

*Ralph M. Hinman III,*for appellant.

*Kermit N. McManus, District Attorney,*for appellee.

The first time this case was before us, the issue was whether the probate court conviction should be set aside as null and void under OCGA § 40-6-376 (d). We answered in the affirmative, but limited our opinion to construction of this statute. We deferred Perkins’s claims that the double jeopardy clauses of the state and federal constitutions barred his retrial until such time as the superior court had ruled upon them.2 The superior court subsequently ruled that double jeopardy did not bar Perkins’s retrial, and Perkins appeals.

1. This Court has held that when a court had no subject matter jurisdiction to try a defendant, any conviction entered by that court is null and void.3 We have also recognized that a defendant whose conviction is so voided may be retried without the attachment of procedural double jeopardy.4 Therefore, Perkins may be tried on the felony indictment in superior court. Any issues of substantive double jeopardy that may arise if Perkins is convicted in superior court are not properly before us today.

2. Perkins’s contention that OCGA § 40-6-376 (d) is unconstitutional on its face is without merit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

*State v. Perkins,*276 Ga. 621 (580 SE2d 523) (2003).

2

Id. at 623.

3

*Mayo v. State,*277 Ga. 645, 646 (594 SE2d 333) (2004); *Weatherbed v. State,*271 Ga. 736, 736-737 (524 SE2d 452) (1999).

4

*Weatherbed,*271 Ga. at 739; *Mayo,*277 Ga. at 647 (Carley, J., concurring).
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
§1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of AmerAlia, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bill H. Gunn, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ Bill H.
Gunn
 Bill H.
Gunn
 Chief
Executive Officer
 Principal
Executive Officer
 
 December
22, 2008
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
AmerAlia, Inc. and will be retained by AmerAlia, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
31.1





CERTIFICATION





I,
Corrado De Gasperis, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Novamerican Steel
Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the condensed consolidated financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s registered public accounting firm and the audit committee of the
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
October 10, 2008








/s/
      Corrado De GasperisCorrado
      De GasperisChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of RedRoller Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Michael
Tribolet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







By:
            /s/
      Michael TriboletMichael
      TriboletChief
      Executive Officer








August
19, 2008
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certificationof Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, C. RandalMills, certify that:

1.              I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Osiris Therapeutics, Inc.

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.              The registrant’s other certifying officer(s), and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)       Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;

(b)       Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)       Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.              The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)       All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)       Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 10,2007
|        |   | /s/ C. Randal Mills    |
|--------|--------|------------------------|
|   |   | C. Randal Mills, Ph.D. |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      13,710,226
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,097,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,185,514
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            45,899,864
<PP&E>                                     186,388,005
<DEPRECIATION>                              57,305,636
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             178,024,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       51,398,720
<BONDS>                                    122,074,897
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 24,117,989
<COMMON>                                        61,954
<OTHER-SE>                               (134,865,256)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               178,024,696
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           125,607,167
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               71,777,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            44,652,818
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          25,907,514
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (17,775,381)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (17,775,381)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (17,775,381)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.21)


</TABLE>
I 

. gl i ~SlvOL ·. · 

----------,-~---~· --

. 1) e_o..( tf1,, \\c.os\~ ,~-- ·------------

. · . _ · . l \ e.~~n-!.1~-~~\C\-\- a 11~3:-· _ 

· :\--_o "'1 o.~\o c . C:.ou(\~~-~ou ,\~_\i.'5Q;_.~""3.~_-_:_w~~-~-e.ci:-.-. __ 

_ · :, ::to_~c~,~\~~--l_o~u,.a_oS_~~~-U>--~_.a..~~(~-c~-s-\__I---=-=~ro.--'----

• Ul'<"i.\\-1\~:_±o t~on'l\ ~D\A ~~-:La.ffi_·~~D~L(_-__ _ 

• .J'\, _\_L Q..· I' .(\~_:" ~\, ~ \~1". •.(\ r'-.· .. \,...~ • ~:"'f 

. ~~-lD_0J_u,~~--~~- ~,---- -~''-'-'~"':'w .;v __ . ~,~ "'-~-~~~~ -~4L\1._W _ -~.9.>-__ ffi.t._~~-s3oc_~ ___ fu~~--___ _ 

_ \, \ ,o'±__~__s2>ncLi~~D-~~-M.,w a&he.ss, l:.'ooolR~'-----

. iou . \fl M~~t.L · _· ____ _ 

:l\fic.g~(1~-l . . ---,-· ..------

-- . z:~ 

.-------. __ ·. f ~-~'i~f) ___ Lctt-%o~'-~ .W. \CO<ooJ-ct\ 

'-----~\k~ £\_~~ ·33'-\L\ . ' 

_._ __ ~·~--- __ -:s_ OL ~~'\0 ~-l1S.. 1\Dl.\ ffi 

---------------------.. ··----~~---

·----