alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 24, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 24, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0479. WILLIAM F. KASPERS et al. v. SOUTHERN POLYMER, INC..

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2011CV209558
# covid_table32_c26_state
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(V)

October 17, 2001

TO:      Dave Sprinkle

FROM:    Ron Rittenmeyer

RE:      PROMOTION TO C.O.O.

As you know, I am promoting you to Chief Operating Officer of Safety-Kleen,
effective immediately, with responsibility for the operations of the Chemical
Services Division (Blue Division) and Branch Sales & Services Division (Yellow
Division). In connection therewith, your annual base salary will be increased to
$350,000 and your target bonus percentage will be increased to 75% of your
annual base salary, pro-rated for the portion of the year following your
promotion.

As we discussed, your current Senior Executive Severance Plan, Senior Executive
Change of Control Agreement ("COCA") and Senior Executive Retention Plan remain
in full force and effect. However, in the event of a Change of Control as
defined by the COCA, the parties' obligations under the COCA, including the
level of your authority, duties, position, benefits, annual base salary, target
bonus percentage, severance and any other benefits in a Post Change Period, as
defined by the COCA, shall be established and/or calculated based upon the
levels of authority, duties, position, annual base salary ($270,000), target
bonus percentage (50%) and benefits in effect immediately preceding this
promotion.

As we also discussed, in the event of a sale of the Blue Division in which the
purchaser determines it would like to hire you in connection with the sale, you
would have the option to go with the purchaser of the Blue Division. In
addition, the Company would also have the option, in its discretion, to require
you to go with the purchaser of the Blue Division.

If this memo accurately sets forth our agreement, please sign below. I look
forward to working with you in your new position.

Accepted & Agreed:



/s/ David M. Sprinkle
Dave Sprinkle

Safety-Kleen Services, Inc. & Safety-Kleen Corp.

By:      /s/ Ronald A. Rittenmeyer

Title:   Chairman, President and CEO
NO. 04-15-00307-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT 

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 

* * * 

AUTOZONE, INC., AND AUTOZONERS, L.L.C., 

 Appellants

V.

MARIO FLORES, 

 Appellee 

* * * 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

 NOW COMES Appellee, MARIO FLORES, by and through his attorneys, 

and hereby respectfully request that this Court issue an Order extending the 

deadline for Appellee’s brief in this matter by twenty (20) days. The current 

deadline for Appellee’s brief is July 27, 2015. Both parties are currently working 

towards drafting an agreeable motion that disposes of this appeal. This is 

Appellee’s first Motion for Extention of Time. The parties have conferred and this 

motion is unopposed. A proposed order is attached for the Court’s convenience. 

WHEREFORE, Appellee MARIO FLORES respectfully moves this Court 

to issue an Order Extending the deadline for Appellee’s brief by twenty (20) days. 

ACCEPTED

04-15-00307-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

7/24/2015 1:24:26 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 07/24/2015 1:24:26 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
Respectfully submitted,

THE CARLSON LAW FIRM, P.C.

Jaime M. Lynn

State Bar No. 24081762

jlynn@carlsonattorneys.com

11606 North Interstate Highway 35

Austin, Texas 78753

(512) 346-5688

(512) 719-4362

THE CARLSON LAW FIRM, P.C.

Kiara Martinez

State Bar No. 00796973

kmartinez@carlsonattorneys.com

400 West Jasper Road

Killeen, Texas 76542

(254) 526-5688

(254) 526-8204

By: /s/ Kiara Martinez

Kiara Martinez

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 

Pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i)(3), the undersigned 

certifies that this motion complies with the type-volume limitations; that, exclusive 

of the exempted portions, the brief contains 240 words and that the brief has been 

prepared proportionally-spaced typeface using Times New Roman in body text. 

/s/ Kiara Martinez

 Kiara Martinez
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true copy of the foregoing Motion was on the 24th day of July 

2015, served in accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on the 

following Counsel of record:

Via Fax: (210) 805-9654

BRETT REYNOLDS & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

Brett T. Reynolds

State Bar No. 16795500

btreynolds@btrlaw.com

1250 N.E. Loop 410, Suite 420

San Antonio, Texas 78209

(210) 805-9799

(210) 805-9654 (telecopier) 

Via Fax: (210) 477-7466

THE LAW OFFICE OF JACQUELINE M. STROH, P.C.

Jacqueline M. Stroh

State Bar No. 00791747

jackie@strohappellate.com

10101 Reunion Place, Suite 600

San Antonio, Texas 78216

(210) 477-7416

(210) 477-7466 (telecopier)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. 23-0641

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

THOMAS JERRY HILL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 29, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 19 2024

03/19/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0641
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Northeast Automotive Holdings, Inc.,
      (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
      2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), I, William Solko, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32, fully
                complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
                Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant





Dated: August 12, 2008
            /s/ William SolkoWilliam Solko, Chief Executive Officer and
              Chief Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be
      retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





This
      certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
      by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of
      1933
      or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date
      of
      the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language
      contained in such filing.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 24, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-11063

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LORETTA A. FIELD,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:02-CR-82-1-G

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Loretta

A. Field on appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Field has

filed no response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief,

and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED; counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T RA N D Y ERI C FU LLER, P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. T . F E L K E R , W a r de n, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 07- 56473 D . C . N o. C V -07-00 54 7-R ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M a nue l L . R e a l , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A ugus t10, 2010 ** B efo re: H A W K IN S , M cK E O W N , an dIK U T A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C alifo rn ia state p riso n erR an d y E ric F u ll erap p ea ls fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on a s unt i m e l y . W e ha ve j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED AU G 26 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 56473 2 F u lle rc o n te n d s th a t h is f e d e r a l p e titio n w a s tim e lyb e c au s e h e is e n title dto e qui t abl e t ol l i ng due t o apr i s on l oc kdow n, w hi c h i nhi bi t e d hi s a c c e s s t o the pr i s on l aw l i b rary. T h i s co n t en t i o n fai l s b ecau se F u l l er’ s l acko f access to th e l aw l i b rary, pe rs e , w a s nota n e xtr a or di na ryc i r c um s t anc e tha tm i ghtha ve c aus e d the u n tim e lin e s s o f

h is p e titio n . See R am i rez v . Y ates , 57 1 F . 3d 99 3, 99 7-98 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). In the al t ernat i ve, F ul l ercont ends thathe i s e nt i t l ed t o an evi dent i ary he a r i ng. F ul l e r ’ s r e l i a nc e on W h a le m /H u n t v . E a r ly, 233 F . 3d 1146 ( 9th C i r . 2000) (e n b anc) i s unavai l i ng because, un l i ke W hale m / H unt , e ve n i f

F ul l e r ’ s a l l e ga t i ons a r e true , e qui t abl e t ol l i ng w oul d notbe w arr ant e d. A FFI R M ED .
60 Occupational Outlook Quarterly • Fall 2006 0 300 600 900 1,200 1,500

Less than a high

school diploma

High school diploma,

no college

Some college, no degree

Associate degree

Bachelor's degree

Master's degree

Professional degree

Doctoral degree

National median weekly earnings = $696

$1,421

409

583

653

699

937

1,129

1,370

Here’s a finding you can bank on: 

The more education you get, the 

more money you are likely to earn. 

And usually, those extra earnings 

are more than pocket change.

Data from the U.S. Bureau of 

Labor Statistics show that median 

earnings increase at every level of 

education. In 2005, as the chart 

illustrates, people who finished 

high school earned almost $175 more 

every week compared with those who 

dropped out. People who completed an 

associate degree program netted more 

than $100 compared with high school 

graduates. 

But diplomas and degrees aren’t 

the only routes to higher paychecks. 

Apprenticeships and other types of 

long-term on-the-job training also 

tend to increase earnings. Many 

occupations that usually require 

long-term training—such as 

machinist and electrician—also 

have median earnings 

comparable with 

those of college 

graduates.

Education and income: More learning is key 

to higher earnings

Median usual weekly earnings of full-time wage-and-salary workers 

aged 25 or older, 2005
73, |19-02
DEAR Copnt :

He RERGON) Tim WRI NS ASCE IVED IN

COURT OF CAMMINAT ABPEALS
SUL 2'7 2615

RE WR-23, lI9-02 atelAcasta ier
Tt Sen} THe District Covel the While Caen
Showin the Cour} thet Yptl DeWED My (1.07

NEVER
However ThE Cour? 19 ain .,
Cot them , AWD AKE RequikKi E TO i
we Court theb Expoteo my btpte Court Rew .
50 = Poy he Covet will SewD me A lopy/
OF the ORoEer Dewinsg Without wei Hew ORDER
Car LY WER-23-)19-04

[ibn Buvow—


23, | [4 -O Z
DEAR Cor} RECEIVED IN

GOURT OF CAHINAT APPEALS
On 4-d4-1y £ Sent A Need L 22 40
Zial Covet Jo%th i ANDREW $ TexAs. becavse
oft Wav Lajormahon that x Didat have pclsess
To At look (ling. Also ON The Grands homes
Rex the da who procuted| his Coare Should
AYE Ruel Hine oc Smee He 1s Mow) the
Jude.
co. Sewt the 107 est Class popil Ov
L-Q4- Iq How aver x heavat heard feom the
TRie| Court AS Rewind by las.
Did they foeuwnnp U Fo Ver © No one have
Told Mme Any thing, ple Leb me Krow

(ASRS
Nilun Ge
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BNP Residential Properties, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Philip
S. Payne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.







  /s/ Philip S. Payne
--------------------------------------------

Philip S. Payne

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer



March 26, 2003





                                       79
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of VS Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended
September 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas A. Tolworthy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of VS Holdings, Inc.
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 13, 2007



/s/ Thomas A. TolworthyThomas A. TolworthyChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
# covid_table31_c26_naics
99.5 INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT PREFERABILITY LETTER


December 24, 2002

Board of Directors
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.
5059 NE 18th Avenue
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida   33334

Dear Sirs/Madams:

We have audited the consolidated financial statements as of September 28, 2002
and September 29, 2001, and for each of the three years in the period ended
September 28, 2002, included in your amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A to the
Securities and Exchange Commission and have issued our report thereon dated
November 27, 2002. Note 2 to such consolidated financial statements contains a
description of your adoption during the year ended September 28, 2002 of average
cost as the Company's inventory valuation method rather than first in first out,
which was previously used by the Company. In our judgment, such change is to an
alternative accounting principle that is preferable under the circumstances.

Yours truly,



                                   /s/ RACHLIN COHEN & HOLTZ LLP
                                   -----------------------------
                                   RACHLIN COHEN & HOLTZ LLP
# 2017

# image4.emf

# image5.emf

# image1.emf

# image2.emf

# image3.emf

# image6.png
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Cleartronic, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |    |  |                                                            
|--------------------- |  | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  |    |  |                                                            
|Date: August 20, 2012 |  |    |  | /s/                                                        
|                      |  | By |  | Larry Reid                                                 
|                      |  |    |  | Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
|                      |  |    |  |                                                            
|                      |  |    |  |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

(609) 989-2144

Fax: (609) 989-0451

 CHAMBERS OF CLARKSON S. FISHER U.S. COURTHOUSE

 DOUGLAS E. ARPERT 402 E. STATE STREET, ROOM 6000

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE TRENTON, NJ 08608

April 5, 2011

LETTER ORDER

RE: 11-CV-164(AET) Cherrie Ann Dehere v. Wells Fargo & Company

A Settlement Conference set for April 15, 2011 at 10:00 A.M., in Trenton - Courtroom 6W

before Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert has been adjourned and reset for May 17, 2011 @

10:00 A.M. Counsel and client representatives with full settlement authority are required to

attend.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Douglas E. Arpert 

DOUGLAS E. ARPERT

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00164-AET-DEA Document 11 Filed 04/05/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 44
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         429,713
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  676,704
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,061,103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,332
<PP&E>                                       2,335,867
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,655,733
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,953,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          631,782
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,857,630
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,953,122
<SALES>                                      4,815,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,815,518
<CGS>                                        2,852,002
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,852,002
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,329,205
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              59,521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                574,790
<INCOME-TAX>                                   174,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            400,790
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   400,790
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
ACCEPTED12-15-00039-CRTWELFTH COURT OF APPEALSTYLER, TEXAS7/27/2015 2:48:31 PMCATHY LUSKCLERK
ACCEPTED

04-15-00383-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

7/24/2015 4:39:48 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 07/24/2015 4:39:48 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-15-00079-CV

GLORIA FELDER, Appellant

V.

WOODLEN GLEN APARTMENTS, Appellee

Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 

1056604).

TO THE COUNTY CIVIL COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF HARRIS COUNTY, 

GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 21st day of May 2015, the case upon appeal to revise or 

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

After due consideration, the Court grants the parties’ 

agreed motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the Court vacates the 

trial court’s judgment and dismisses the case.

The Court orders that the appellant, Gloria Felder, pay 

all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.
Judgment rendered May 21, 2015.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Justices 

Jennings, Bland, and Brown.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court 

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

July 24, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT