alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited (Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (Report), Michael P. Corkery, Acting Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL P. CORKERY                                                                                            
|Michael P. Corkery                                                                                                
|Acting Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)                                                                      
|                                                                                                                  
|November 9, 2009                                                                                                  

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to ICO Global
Communications (Holdings) Limited and will be retained by ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBAENES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Stem Cell Therapy International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officers knowledge: Section 13(a)



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of Section 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934: and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



|                                          |  |  |  |                                                    |  |  |  |                
|----------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------
|Signatures                                |  |  |  | Title                                              |  |  |  | Date           
|                                          |  |  |  |                                                   
|/s/ David Stark                           |  |  |  | President                                          |  |  |  | August 18, 2008
|David Stark                               |  |  |  |                                                    |  |  |  |                
|                                          |  |  |  |                                                   
|/s/ Andrew J. Norstrud Andrew J. Norstrud |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer & Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  | August 18, 2008
|                                          |  |  |  |                                                    |
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 21-11655

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MATTHEW KORCZ, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

D.C. Docket No. 2:19-cr-00193-RDP-JHE-2

____________________

USCA11 Case: 21-11655 Date Filed: 01/05/2022 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 21-11655

Before NEWSOM, LAGOA and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Prueter, appointed counsel for Matthew Korcz in 

his direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further 

representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review 

of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Korcz’s conviction 

and sentence are AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 21-11655 Date Filed: 01/05/2022 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Stem Cell Therapy International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the six months ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officers knowledge: Section 13(a)



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of Section 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934: and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|/s/ David Stark                                   
|David Stark                                       
|President                                         
|                                                  
|February 3, 2009                                  
|                                                  
|/s/ Andrew J. Norstrud                            
|Andrew J. Norstrud                                
|Chief Financial Officer & Chief Accounting Officer
|                                                  
|February 3, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The undersigned, Mark L. Baum, Principal Executive Officer of Transdel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.
The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 23rd day of February, 2012.




By:
/s/ Mark L. BaumMark L. Baum, Esq.Secretary and Chairman of the Board of Directors(Principal Executive Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Transdel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Transdel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Primoris Services Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter J. Moerbeek, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



In
witness whereof, the undersigned has executed and delivered this certificate as of the date set forth opposite his signature below.

Date: May 13, 2009

/s/ PETER J. MOERBEEK Peter J. Moerbeek Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director


---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dante Thatcher, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 402]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Molea, J.), rendered March 20, 2012, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there axe no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Dillon, J.P., Leventhal, Chambers and Miller, JJ., concur.
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Colston, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Colston,*111 Ohio St.3d 266, 2006-Ohio-5703.]

(No. 2006-0272

Submitted September 20, 2006

Decided November 15, 2006.)

Law Firm of Curt C. Hartman and Curt C. Hartman, for appellant.

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Buehner,*110 Ohio St.3d 403, 2006-Ohio-4707, 853 N.E.2d 1162.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J.,

dissents for the reasons he dissented in *State v. Buehner,*110 Ohio St.3d 403, 2006-Ohio-4707, 853 N.E.2d 1162.
@misc{1206491,
  author = {Jeremy Doerr and Conrad Bock and Raphael Barbau},
  title = {Verifying Executability of SysML Behavior Models Using Alloy Analyzer},
  year = {2022},
  month = {2022-02-24 05:02:00},
  publisher = {NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=932985},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8388},
  language = {en},
}
#### Berea City School District Board of Education, Appellee, et al. *v.*Cuyahoga County Board of Revision et al., Appellees; Manlaw Investment Company, Ltd., Appellant.

[Cite as *Berea City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision,*111 Ohio St.3d 1219, 2006-Ohio-5601.]

(No. 2006-1526

Submitted October 3, 2006

Decided November 1, 2006.)

{¶ 1} Appellant has filed a notice of appeal from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) and a supplemental certificate of service. Appellee Berea City School District Board of Education has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and a motion to strike the supplemental certifícate of service. Appellant has also filed a motion to suspend ruling on the motion to dismiss.

{¶ *2}*In *Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision,*110 Ohio St.3d 1242, 2006-Ohio-4091, 852 N.E.2d 178, the BTA had issued a decision in an appeal from a county board of revision, and we dismissed the appeal therefrom because the appellant had failed to serve the Tax Commissioner who, by operation of R.C. 5717.03(B) and 5717.04, is a party to such appeals. We now hold that the certified-mail service required by R.C. 5717.04 must be initiated within the thirty-day period prescribed by R.C. 5717.04 for the filing of an appeal. For purposes of complying with this requirement, service is “initiated” when the notice of appeal is placed in the mail. In this case, appellant initiated certified mailing of the notice of appeal to the Tax Commissioner after the expiration of the thirty-day period, and that act failed to comply with the jurisdictional requirement of service under R.C. 5717.04.

{¶ 3} Accordingly, the motion to suspend ruling on the motion to dismiss is denied, the motion to strike is deemed to be a supplemental motion to dismiss, the motions to dismiss are granted on the authority of *Olympic Steel,*and the appeal is dismissed. Appellant’s motion to add the Tax Commissioner as an appellee is denied as moot.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

*1220Kadish, Hinkel & Weibel, Kevin M. Hinkel, and Rita M. Jarrett, for appellee Berea City School District Board of Education.

Siegel, Siegel, Johnson & Jennings Co., L.P.A., Fred Siegel, and Nicholas M.J. Ray, for appellant.

Pfeifer, J.,

dissents for the reason stated in his dissent in *Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision,*110 Ohio St.3d 1242, 2006-Ohio-4091, 852 N.E.2d 178, ¶ 5.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH SMITH,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 79 WAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of RehabCare Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I John H. Short, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

                                                                                                                                                                                 
| By:    | /s/  John H. Short |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   | John H. Short                |
|   | President and                |
|   | Chief Executive Officer      |
|   | RehabCare Group, Inc.        |
|   | March 14, 2006               |

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                 

 

 

 

- 1 -
@misc{1031,
  author = {Weston Tew},
  title = {Calibration of Cryogenic Resistance Thermometers between 0.65 K and 165 K on the International Temperature Scale of 1990},
  year = {2015},
  month = {2015-08-11},
  publisher = {Special Publication (NIST SP), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.250-91},
  language = {en},
}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7640

DEE DEIDRE FARMER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

WILLIAM CHERRY,

Plaintiff,

versus

TERRY PENNINGTON, Lieutenant; ROBERT FOX, Unit

Manager; J. ROBINSON, Correctional Counselor;

JERRY GAUGHAN, Disciplinary Hearing Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-95-440-5-H)

Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 29, 1997

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dee Deidre Farmer, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appellant's motions for voluntary dismissal and to vacate judgment. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

that, given this court's affirmance of the district court's underlying decision on the merits, the district court did not abuse its

discretion in denying Appellant's motions. See United States v.

Williams, 674 F.2d 310, 312 (4th Cir. 1982). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from Angeles
Income  Properties,  LTD. 6 1999 Fourth  Quarter  10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                 0000812564
<NAME>                                Angeles Income Properties, LTD. 6
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000


<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                        1,235
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                       15,988
<DEPRECIATION>                                5,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               15,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                       8,426
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    6,298
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 15,322
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              5,646
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              3,381
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              757
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  460
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (1,011)
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  1,714
<EPS-BASIC>                                   29.91 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-3825

___________________________

Koatha Perry Broadus

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: July 22, 2015

Filed: July 24, 2015 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SHEPHERD, BYE, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Koatha Perry Broadus appeals the district court’s1

 order affirming the denial of

supplemental security income. Upon careful consideration of Broadus’s challenges

to the residual functional capacity (RFC) determination, and de novo review of the

record, we agree with the district court that the administrative law judge’s

determination that Broadus is not disabled is supported by substantial evidence on the

record as a whole. See Lott v. Colvin, 772 F.3d 546, 548-49 (8th Cir. 2014); see also

Myers v. Colvin, 721 F.3d 521, 527 (8th Cir. 2013) (considerations in RFC

determination); Martise v. Astrue, 641 F.3d 909, 923 (8th Cir. 2011) (it is claimant’s

burden to establish RFC). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

______________________________

1

The Honorable Sarah W. Hays, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western

District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent

of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-