alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, Jackie L. Reed, President and CEO, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FGBC Bancshares, Inc.2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: November 13, 2006     /s/ Jackie L. Reed     Jackie L. Reed  President and CEO
#### STARNS v. SUCCESS PORTRAIT CO.

Civ. No. 52.

(District Court, E. D. Tennessee, S. D.

Dec. 4, 1940.

Thach & Thach, by Tom S. Thach, all of Chattanooga, Tenn., for plaintiff.

Lynch, Whitaker, Hall & Allison, by William W. Haynes and Carmack Water-house, all of Chattanooga, Tenn., for defendants.

DARR, District Judge.

The defendant has submitted a motion seeking a dismissal of the suit on the grounds that the amount actually in controversy is less that $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs.

This motion is an appropriate manner to challenge the allegations of jurisdictional facts. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 12(b) (1), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

The jurisdictional facts being challenged in an appropriate manner, the plaintiff must support them by competent proof. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation, 298 U.S. 178, 186, 56 S.Ct. 780, 80 L.Ed. 1135; KVOS v. Associated Press, 299 U.S. 269, 57 S.Ct. 197, 81 L.Ed. 183.

Such proof may be submitted under authority of and in the manner provided by Rule 43(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The plaintiff did not submit any proof on this question. On the other hand, the defendant introduced proof sustaining the proposition that the amount in controversy is less than $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs.

The motion should be sustained because the plaintiff has failed to justify his allegations of jurisdictional facts by a preponderance of evidence.

I have looked into the allegations in the complaint and reviewed the affidavits submitted by the defendant, from all of which I am impressed that the amount involved is less than that required to give this court jurisdiction.

The motion will be sustained and the suit dismissed.

Order accordingly.
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, Jackie L. Reed, President and CEO, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FGBC Bancshares, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: August 11, 2006            /s/ Jackie L. Reed Jackie L. Reed    President and CEO  
16
Case 2:11-cv-00013-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 01/03/11 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1
Case 2:11-cv-00013-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 01/03/11 Page 2 of 15 PageID: 2
Case 2:11-cv-00013-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 01/03/11 Page 3 of 15 PageID: 3
Case 2:11-cv-00013-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 01/03/11 Page 4 of 15 PageID: 4
Case 2:11-cv-00013-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 01/03/11 Page 5 of 15 PageID: 5
Case 2:11-cv-00013-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 01/03/11 Page 6 of 15 PageID: 6
Case 2:11-cv-00013-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 01/03/11 Page 7 of 15 PageID: 7
Case 2:11-cv-00013-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 01/03/11 Page 8 of 15 PageID: 8
Case 2:11-cv-00013-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 01/03/11 Page 9 of 15 PageID: 9
Case 2:11-cv-00013-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 01/03/11 Page 10 of 15 PageID: 10
Case 2:11-cv-00013-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 01/03/11 Page 11 of 15 PageID: 11
Case 2:11-cv-00013-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 01/03/11 Page 12 of 15 PageID: 12
Case 2:11-cv-00013-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 01/03/11 Page 13 of 15 PageID: 13
Case 2:11-cv-00013-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 01/03/11 Page 14 of 15 PageID: 14
Case 2:11-cv-00013-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 01/03/11 Page 15 of 15 PageID: 15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

(609) 989-2144

Fax: (609) 989-0451

 CHAMBERS OF CLARKSON S. FISHER U.S. COURTHOUSE

 DOUGLAS E. ARPERT 402 E. STATE STREET, ROOM 6000

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE TRENTON, NJ 08608

March 10, 2011

LETTER ORDER

RE: 11-CV-164(AET) Cherrie Ann Dehere v. Wells Fargo & Company

A Settlement Conference will be held by the undersigned on April 15, 2011 at 10:00 A.M., in

Trenton - Courtroom 6W before Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert. Counsel and client

representatives with full settlement authority are required to attend.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Douglas E. Arpert 

DOUGLAS E. ARPERT

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00164-AET-DEA Document 10 Filed 03/10/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 43
PROMISSORY NOTE




PROMISSORY NOTE


("Note")


 


Date: December 19, 2001


 


Location: Vancouver, British
Columbia


 


NEUTRON ENTERPRISES, INC., a Nevada
corporation (the "Maker"), for value received, each promise to pay
Nanuk Warman (the "Holder"), or his assigns, the sum of 10,000
USD, with interest thereon at the rate of six percent (6%) per annum, compounded
yearly, upon demand of the Holder. Holder makes demand by delivering to the
Maker notice in writing on his demand that the entire amount, or a portion of
said amount, be paid. At the receipt of the demand of the Holder to the Maker,
the amount so demanded shall immediately become due, including any accrued but
unpaid interest on the principal demanded by the Holder.


 


If any principal due hereunder
shall be unpaid when due, the entire amount owing, including all principal,
shall become due and payable at once without further notice, at the option of
the holder thereof. The Maker hereby waives presentment and/or notice of
dishonor. The principal may be prepaid in whole or in part without penalty.


 


After maturity (after demand is
made and the Maker default), this Note shall bear interest at the rate of EIGHT
PERCENT (8%) per annum until paid in full.


 


In the event that the holder of
this Note employs an attorney to enforce any of the terms of this note and are
successful, the Maker agree to pay reasonable attorney fees. In the event of
trial or appeal from trial, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable
attorney fees to be fixed by the court. The Maker agrees that venue for any
action on this Note, to enforce or otherwise, shall be Las Vegas, Nevada, and
that the laws of Nevada shall apply.


 


The Maker of this Note execute the
same as a principal and not as a surety.


 


NEUTRON ENTERPRISES, INC.


 


BY: /S/
NANUK WARMAN


Its President.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 9, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00308

- CR

Gerald WASHINGTON

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR1095 Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on November 1, 2017. The appellant previously has been granted two extensions of time to file his brief, extending the deadline to January 2, 2018. On January 5, 2018, appellant filed a motion requesting a third extension of time to file his brief until February 1, 2018, for a total extension of ninety days. The motion is

GRANTED. THIS IS THE FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME THAT THE APPELLANT

WILL BE GRANTE D . The Appellant’s brief must be filed by February 1, 2018, or this appeal

will be abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing, and the trial court will be asked to consider whether sanctions are appropriate. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(2).

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of January, 2018

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000



Subsidiary of BNP Residential Properties, Inc.:

     Subsidiary name:             BNP Residential Properties Limited Partnership
     State of organization:       Delaware
     Business name:               BNP Residential Properties Limited Partnership

Subsidiaries of BNP Residential Properties Limited Partnership:

     Subsidiary name:                     BNP Realty, LLC
     State of organization:               North Carolina
     Business name:                       BNP Realty, LLC

     Subsidiary name:                     BNP/Chrysson Phase I, LLC
     State of organization:               North Carolina
     Business name:                       BNP/Chrysson Phase I, LLC

     Subsidiary name:                     BNP Chason Ridge, LLC
     State of organization:               North Carolina
     Business name:                       BNP Chason Ridge, LLC

Subsidiary of BNP Realty, LLC:

     Subsidiary name:                     BNP Management, Inc.
     State of organization:               North Carolina
     Business name:                       BNP Management, Inc.





                                       49
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Viscorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:  February 22, 2007



/s/ Charles Driscoll

Name: Charles Driscoll

Title:  Chief Executive Officer







Dated:  February 22, 2007



/s/ Charles Driscoll

Name: Charles Driscoll

Title:  Chief Financial Officer
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 18 97

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
Mi ch ael L. W at so n
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ct of M is so ur i - J op li n

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Jan ua ry

6, 2 01 7 Fi le d: Jan ua ry

10 , 20 17 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re SHEPHERD, ARNOLD, and KELLY , Cir cu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Mi ch ael W at so n di rect ly ap pe al s fro m th e se nt en ce th e di st ric t co ur t im po se d 1 aft er he pl ead ed gu il ty to dr ug an d fir ea r m c h a r g e s , un de r a pl ea ag reem en t th at

The Hon or ab le Ro se an n A. Ketc hm ark , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e 1 W es te rn Dis tri ct Mi ss ou ri.co nt ai ne d an ap pe al waiv er, b u t r e s e rv ed hi s rig ht to ch al le ng e th e im po si ti on of a
care er-o ffen de r en ha nc em en t. H is co un se l has m ov ed to wit hd raw and fil ed a br ie f

un de r And ers v. Cal ifo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8 (1 96 7) , rai si ng arg um en ts rel at ed t o hi s
co nv ic ti on an d se nt en ce, an d ch al le ng in g th e care er-o ffen de r en ha nc em en t. W at so n ha s fil ed a pr o se br ie f an d m ov ed fo r ap po in tm en t of ne w co un se l. In hi s pr o se b r i e f, W at so n arg ue s th at th e di st ric t co ur t erre d in ap pl y in g th e care er-o ff e n d e r
en ha nc em en t.

W e co nc lu de th at W at so n wai v e d h i s ch al le ng e to th e care er-o ffen de r
en ha nc em en t by

rai si ng an d th en wit hd rawi ng an ob jecti on to it in th e di st ric t cou rt pr oc eed in gs

. See Uni t e d S t a t e s v. St on ey End of Hor n, 82 9 F.3 d 68 1, 68 7- 88 (8 th Ci r. 20 16 ) (wh ere de fen da nt wit hd rew ob jecti on to PS R en ha

nc em en t in di st ric t co ur t, cl ai m of erro r on ap pe al was waiv ed ). W e fu rth er co nc lu de th at th e ap pe al waiv er is

en fo rcea bl e as to co un se l’s ot he r arg um en ts

. See U n i t e d S t a t e s v. Sco tt , 62 7 F.3 d 70 2, 70 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 10 ) (d e no vo rev ie w of va li di ty an d ap pl ic ab i l it y of ap pe al waiv er); Uni te d St at es v. And is , 33 3 F.3 d 88 6 , 8 9 0 -9 2 (8 th Ci r. 20 03 ) (en ba nc ) (d is cu ss in g en fo rcem en t of ap pe al waiv ers ). Fu rth erm or e, w e ha ve in de pe nd en tl y
rev ie wed th e reco rd un de r Pen so n v. Ohi o, 48 8 U.S. 75 (1 98 8) , an d ha ve f ou nd no
no n- f r i v o l o us is su es fo r ap pe al

. Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm as to th e care er-o ffen de r
en ha nc em en t an d ot he rwis e en fo rce th e ap pe al waiv er, we gr an t co un se l’s m ot io n,
an d we d en y

W at so n’s m ot io n.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000387

24-JUL-2015

08:19 AM
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 1 of 24 PageID: 1
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 2 of 24 PageID: 2
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 3 of 24 PageID: 3
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 4 of 24 PageID: 4
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 5 of 24 PageID: 5
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 6 of 24 PageID: 6
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 7 of 24 PageID: 7
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 8 of 24 PageID: 8
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 9 of 24 PageID: 9
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 10 of 24 PageID: 10
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 11 of 24 PageID: 11
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 12 of 24 PageID: 12
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 13 of 24 PageID: 13
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 14 of 24 PageID: 14
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 15 of 24 PageID: 15
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 16 of 24 PageID: 16
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 17 of 24 PageID: 17
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 18 of 24 PageID: 18
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 19 of 24 PageID: 19
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 20 of 24 PageID: 20
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 21 of 24 PageID: 21
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 22 of 24 PageID: 22
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 23 of 24 PageID: 23
Case 2:10-cv-06268-FSH -PS Document 1 Filed 12/03/10 Page 24 of 24 PageID: 24
EXHIBIT 32



IMMUCELL CORPORATION



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ImmuCell Corporation (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Michael F. Brigham, President, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.



/s/    MICHAEL F.
BRIGHAMMichael F. Brigham President, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer




March 22, 2004
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6479

ELIJAH SHANE CLARY,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DARLENE WHITE; SHEILA MOORE; MS. HARRIS; DR. ATEIAT PHILIPS; 

SERGEANT DEBORAH HAMM; MR. PHILIPS; MS. WHALEY; MR. FIELDS; 

MR. BODY,

 Defendants – Appellees,

and

SERGEANT HARPER; ROBERT C. LEWIS; CYNTHIA MUNDY; UNKNOWN 

CUSTODY OFFICER,

 Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief

District Judge. (5:12-ct-03204-D)

Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: July 27, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elijah Shane Clary, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly D. Grande, NORTH 

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Kelly 
2

Street Brown, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, 

PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Elijah Shane Clary seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

granting summary judgment in part in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) 

action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); 

Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). 

The order Clary seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Metals USA Holdings Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Periodic Report), I, C. Lourenco Goncalves, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. To my
knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                                                            
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 12, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/    C. LOURENCO
GONCALVES                               
|                         |  |  |  | C. Lourenco Goncalves President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing
Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.