alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 04-15-00383-CV 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 

IN RE HATTIE POOLE 

 

From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2014-PC-4118 

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding 

APPELLANT BARRY SNELL’S

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL

Barry Snell, who filed his own appeal as an Appellant in this case, hereby notifies the 

court that he wishes to withdraw his appeal and his Motion for Stay on the following grounds: 

 1. Mrs. Hattie Poole has retained attorney Phillip Ross to represent her. Mr. Ross 

will be seeking leave to appear as her lead counsel in the Probate Court. 

 2. Since Mrs. Poole has decided to retain other counsel, Barry Snell’s appeal is 

moot and Barry Snell no longer seeks to represent Mrs. Poole in this matter. 

WHEREFORE, Barry Snell prays that his appeal be withdrawn or alternatively 

dismissed for mootness. Barry Snell requests general relief. 

ACCEPTED

04-15-00383-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

7/24/2015 9:58:44 AM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 07/24/2015 9:58:44 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
Respectfully submitted,

Bayne, Snell & Krause

1250 N.E. Loop 410, Suite 725

San Antonio, Texas 78209

Telephone: (210) 824-3278

Telecopier: (210) 824-3937

By: /s/ Barry Snell

Barry Snell

State Bar No. 18789000

bsnell@bsklaw.com

Attorney Pro Se
Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served upon the 

following counsel of record on the 24th day of July, 2015:

Ms. Teresa Christian

The Christian Law Firm, PLLC

22211 IH 10 West, Suite 1206

San Antonio, Texas 78257

Guardian Ad Litem for Hattie Poole

Ms. Carmen Samaniego

Attorney at Law

8100 Broadway, Suite 105

San Antonio, Texas 78209

Attorney Ad Litem for Hattie Poole

Mr. Bill Leighner

Cavaretta, Katona & Francis, PLLC

One Riverwalk Place

700 N. St. Mary’s Street, Suite 1500

San Antonio, Texas 78205

Attorney for Jeff Poole

Mr. Robert E. Golden

Golden Law, P.C.

Pacific Plaza, Suite 611

14100 San Pedro Avenue

San Antonio, Texas 78232-4363

Attorney for Ben Marek

Mr. Ricky J. Poole

Law Offices of Ricky J. Poole

8000 I.H. 10 West, Suite 1600

San Antonio, Texas 78230

Honorable Tom Rickhoff

Probate Court No. 2

Bexar County Courthouse

San Antonio, Texas 78205

 /s/ Barry Snell

Barry Snell
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. JESUS R ODRIGUEZ GONZALEZ, a . k.a . Je sus Gonz a le z R odrigue z , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-50167

D.C . No. 8:13-c r-00037-DOC M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Dav id O. C arte r, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 21, 2015 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, GOULD, a n d N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. Je sus R odrigue zGonz a le za ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s his guilty-ple a c onvic tion a

nd 27-m onth se nte nc e for be ing a n ille ga l a lie n found in the

Unite d Stat e s following de porta tion, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326. Pursua

nt to Ande rs v . C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), R o drigue z 

# FIL ED JAN 27 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Gonz a le z ’ s c ounse l ha s file d a brie f stating tha

t the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a

m o tion to withdra

w a s c ounse l of re c o rd. W e have provide d R odrigue zGonz a le zthe opportunity to filea pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or answe ring brie f ha s be e n file d . Our indepe nde nt re v i e w of the re c ord pursua nt to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a rgua ble grounds for re lie f on dire c t a ppe a l; the re fore , we a ffirm R o drigue z Gonz a le z ’ s c o nvic tion a nd se nte n c e . In a c c orda

nc e with Unite d State

s v . Riv e ra-Sanc he

z , 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th C ir. 2000), were m and the c a se to thedistric t c ourt with instructions tha t it de le te from

the judgm e nt the re fe re nc e to 8 U.S.C . § 1326(b)(2). Se eUnite d State s v . He rre ra-Blanc o , 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th C ir. 2000) (re m a n ding sua sponteto de le te the re fe re n c e to se c tion 1326(b)(2)). C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. AFFIRM E D; RE M ANDE D to c or r e c t the judgm e nt.

1 4 - 5 0 1 6 7 2
NO. 01-15-00305-CV ________________________________________________________

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST 

JUDICIAL DISCTRICT OF TEXAS 

____________________________________

BACON-TOMSONS, LTD., BRL OIL AND GAS, L.L.C.,

AND FERRELL EDWIN MUNSON,

 Appellants

VS.

CHRISJO ENERGY, INC. AND JACK M. CLINE,

 

 Appellees 

 

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE LEAD COUNSEL

Appellants Bacon-Tomsons, Ltd., BRL Oil and Gas, L.L.C. and Ferrell Edwin 

Munson (“Appellants’”) file this Motion to Substitute Lead Counsel.

Appellants approve of and request that the Court enter an order substituting 

Chris Di Ferrante as their lead counsel of record and permitting Kyle Dickson to 

withdraw as Appellants lead counsel of record.

Mr. Di Ferrante’s State Bar and contact information is as follows:

Chris Di Ferrante

TBN: 05858800

402 East 11th Street.

Houston, Texas 77008

713-868-1919

713-868-1899 – FAX

chris@cdflaw.com 

ACCEPTED

01-15-00305-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/24/2015 2:16:18 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/24/2015 2:16:18 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
This substitution of counsel is not sought for delay.

This substitution is not opposed by an appellee.

WHEREFORE, Appellants’ Bacon-Tomsons, Ltd. BRL Oil and Gas, L.L.C.

and Ferrell Edwin Munson respectfully request that the Court grant this motion for 

substitution of lead counsel.

Respectfully submitted,

By: _/s/ Chris Di Ferrante____ 

TBN: 05858800

402 E. 11th Street 

Houston, Texas 77008

Telephone (713) 868-1919

Facsimile (713) 868-1899

chris@cdflaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this the 24th day of July, 2015, true and correct copies 

of the foregoing instrument were forwarded via e-mail, to the attorney listed below.

Robert E. Booth

Mills Shirley LLP

2228 Mechanic St., Suite 400

Galveston, Texas 77550

Representing appellees Chrisjo Energy, Inc. and Cline

 __/s/ Chris Di Ferrante_________
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 127 (Monday, July 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15736]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13447-000]


McGinnis, Inc.; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application Accepted 
for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Competing 
Applications

June 25, 2009.
    On April 29, 2009, McGinnis, Inc., filed an application for a 
preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, 
proposing to study the feasibility of the McAlpine Hydrokinetic 
Project, located on the Ohio River, in Jefferson County, Kentucky, and 
Clark County, Indiana. The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if 
issued, is to grant the permit holder priority to file a license 
application during the permit term. A preliminary permit does not 
authorize the permit holder to perform any land disturbing activities 
or otherwise enter upon lands or waters owned by others without the 
owners' express permission.
    The proposed project would consist of: (1) A 100 to 300-foot-long 
by 20 to 52-foot-wide barge spudded down to the riverbed; (2) 10 6-8-
foot-long by 6-8-foot-diameter turbine-generators mounted in line along 
the side of the barge; (3) one armored, high-voltage cable transmitting 
the generated power to the existing transmission line located adjacent 
to the proposed project area; and (4) appurtenant facilities. The 
proposed project would generate about 1,533 megawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Bruce D. McGinnis, Sr., McGinnis, Inc., P.O. Box 
534, 502 Second St. Ext., South Point, OH 45680, phone: (740) 377-4391.
    FERC Contact: Sergiu Serban, 202-502-6211.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the 
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of the 
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. 
Enter the docket number (P-13447) in the docket number field to access 
the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-15736 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### RABE v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO.

Civ. No. 601.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

Sept. 10, 1940.

*392Ira L. Pollock, of Taunton, Mass., for plaintiff.

Jeremiah W. Mahoney and Lyne, Wood-worth & Evarts, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant.

Findings of Fact.

McLELLAN, District Judge.

This motion by the defendant for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c, is accompanied by affidavits. The plaintiff filed no affidavits and offered no evidence. This was due to no lack of opportunity. The complaint contains five counts, but it is sufficient to state that as beneficiary of an insurance policy, the plaintiff seeks to recover, with interest thereon, $3,000, the amount for which the insured’s life was originally insured, and in addition thereto, the amount, with interest, of certain weekly payments as for the total and permanent disability of the insured. The policy was issued in 1923 and the last payment of a premium was made in 1924, at which time the policy had earned no cash surrender value. In 1934, some ten years after the last premium payment, the insured died. The policy provided in substance that upon due and timely proof of the insured’s total and permanent disability, the payment of premiums would be waived. The complaint alleged no such proof and there was no due proof of such total and permanent disability as resulted in a waiver of the payment of premiums.

Other material facts appear in the defendant’s affidavits filed with the motion. The pleadings and the affidavits are incorporated herein by reference and the affidavits are found to be in accordance with the facts. Upon the whole record, I find that as early as the year 1925, the policy lapsed for non payment of the premiums for which it provides.

Conclusions of Law.

The pleadings in connection with the rest of the record, including the affidavits on file, show that in the words of Rule 56, “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” The defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted and judgment is to be entered for the defendant, but for reasons not necessary here to state, neither party is to recover costs.
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL

Justice

MACKEY K. HANCOCK

Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE

Justice

Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas

Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A

Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449

www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx

VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

July 24, 2015

Mary Thornton

Attorney at Law

3901 Race St

Fort Worth, TX 76111-5958

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Debra Ann Windsor

Assistant District Attorney

401 W. Belknap St.

Fort Worth, TX 76196-0201

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 07-15-00249-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 1345818D

Style: Rudy Cortinas v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

The captioned appeal has been reinstated on the Court’s docket as of Friday,

July 24, 2015 and the following is filed:

Clerk's Record (1 volume including appointment of counsel)

The Reporter’s Record is due on Monday, July 27, 2105. 

Very truly yours,

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

xc: Honorable Ruben Gonzalez, Jr. (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Thomas A. Wilder (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Rudy Cortinas

Angie Taylor (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

FILE COPY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>                 THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                         EXTRACTED FROM THE COASTAL 1987 DRILLING PROGRAM, LTD.
                         FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER
                         31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
                         TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                              48
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      122
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   170
<PP&E>                                          17,751
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,828
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               98
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,093
<SALES>                                            653
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   669
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (95)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (95)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (95)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 736 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 736

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit Members 
   from voting ``present'' on any question on which a record vote is 
                                 taken.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 3, 2019

Mr. Higgins of Louisiana submitted the following resolution; which was 
                   referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit Members 
   from voting ``present'' on any question on which a record vote is 
                                 taken.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This resolution may be cited as the ``Stand For Something 
Resolution''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING MEMBERS FROM VOTING ``PRESENT'' ON QUESTIONS ON 
              WHICH A RECORD VOTE IS TAKEN.

    Rule XX of the Rules of the House of Representatives is amended by 
adding at the end the following new clause:
``Requiring voting in affirmative or negative
    ``12. On any question on which a record vote is taken in the House, 
including the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union, 
or in any committee of the House, a Member may vote only in the 
affirmative or the negative and may not vote `present'.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b)
AND 15d-14(b)


(Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Neuralstem, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Conron, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of the operation of the
  Company.





/s/John ConronJohn
      ConronChief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)
              Neuralstem,
      Inc.





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 127 (Monday, July 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15768]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-71,238]


John Maneely Company, Wheatland Tube Co. Division, a.k.a. Sharon 
Tube Co., 134 Mill Street, Sharon, PA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on June 16, 2009 in response to a petition 
filed by United Steelworkers union officials on behalf of workers of 
John Maneely Company, Wheatland Tube Co. Division, a.k.a. Sharon Tube 
Co., 134 Mill Street, Sharon, Pennsylvania.
    The subject worker group is covered by an earlier petition (TA-W-
71,184) filed on June 16, 2009 that is the subject of an ongoing 
investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of June 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-15768 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
32 Occupational Outlook Quarterly.Spring 2003

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), more than

half of all workers used a computer on the job in September

2001. And nearly three-fourths of those workers connected

to the Internet or used e-mail.

Data from the September 2001 supplement to the Current Population Survey indicate that 54 percent of employed

persons, or about 72 million workers, used a computer on

the job. Of those, 72 percent—roughly 52 million workers—

cited using a computer to gain access to the Internet or for

sending and receiving e-mail. As the chart shows, rates of

computer and Internet or e-mail use varied by occupation.

In addition to Internet access and e-mail use, activities of

people who used a computer at work included word processing or desktop publishing, spreadsheet or database

creation or review, and calendar or scheduling tasks. Computer use also varied by demographic characteristics such as

age, sex, and level of educational attainment.

For more information, call (202) 691-6378, visit the

Current Population Survey program online at

www.bls.gov/cps, or view online the summary of computer and Internet use in 2001 at www.bls.gov/

news.release/ciuaw.nr0.htm.

Managerial and professional specialty 66 80

Technical, sales, and administrative support 45 67

Precision production, craft, and repair 18 30

Service occupations 12 23

Operators, fabricators, and laborers 8 20

Farming, forestry, and fishing 13 19

Internet access or e-mail use at work Used a computer at work

Computer

and Internet

or e-mail use

at work by

occupational

group,

September 2001

(percent)
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15I0244. GREENBERG FARROW ARCHITECTURE, INC. v. JMLS 1422,

LLC.

In this action for declaratory judgment, breach of contract, and conversion, the

trial court granted JMLS 1422, LLC’s motion for partial summary judgment on the 

plaintiff’s breach of contract and conversion claims. Greenberg Farrow Architecture,

Inc. seeks interlocutory review of the trial court’s order.

 Under OCGA § 9-11-56 (h), the grant of partial summary judgment on any

issue or as to any party is reviewable by direct appeal. Olympic Dev. Group v.

American Druggists’ Ins. Co., 175 Ga. App. 425 (1) (333 SE2d 622) (1985). Thus,

the order that Greenberg Farrow Architecture, Inc. seeks to appeal is directly

appealable and notsubject to the interlocutory appeal requirements. “This Court will

grant a timely application for interlocutory review if the order complained of is

subject to direct appeal and the applicants have not otherwise filed a notice of

appeal.” Spivey v. Hembree, 268 Ga. App. 485, 602 SE2d 246 (2004). Accordingly,

this application is ordered GRANTED.

Greenberg Farrow Architecture, Inc. shall have ten days from the date of this

order to file a notice of appeal in the trial court, if one has not already been filed. The

trial court clerk is instructed to include a copy of this order in the appellate record.

July 08, 2015
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/08/2015