alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Thomas A. Tolworthy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of VS Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2007



|    |  |                                      |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------ |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Thomas A. Tolworthy              |  | 
|    |  | Thomas A. Tolworthy                  |  | 
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director |  |
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-60728 Summary Calendar

JEFFERSON JARAMILLO-CHANG Petitioner

v. MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A94 895 763
Before DAVIS, GARZA and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jefferson Jaramillo-Chang, a native and citizen of Colombia, petitions this court for review of an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings. Jaramillo-Chang argues that the BIA erred by denying his motion to reopen to consider new evidence in support of his asylum claim. To the extent that Jaramillo-Chang’s motion to reopen was based upon his eligibility for other clai ms for relief, he has United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D August 5, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-60728

2 abandoned those other claims. See Soadjedev. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir. 2003) (issues not raised in alien’s brief in support of his petition for review of decision by BIA were deemed abandoned). Thiscourt reviewsfor an abuse ofdiscretion when the BIA deniesa motion to reopen based upon a failure to establi sh a prima facie case for the relief sought. Pritchett v. INS , 993 F.2d 80, 83 (5th Cir. 1993). Jaramillo-Chang’s asylum claim was denied because he failed to establish past persecution and because he failed toshowa nexus between the harm he feared and any protected ground. Moreover, the threat to Jaramillo-Chang was not country-wide, as he had lived in other parts of Colombia without being threatened. The new evidence offered by Jaramillo-Chang in his motion to reopen did not resolve those deficiencies. The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying JaramilloChang’s motion to reopen. Id

. Jaramillo-Chang’s petition for review is DENIED.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11796 and #11797]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Kentucky (FEMA-1841-DR), dated 05/29/2009. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Flooding, and Mudslides. *Incident Period:*
                         05/03/2009 through 05/20/2009.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         05/29/2009. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/28/2009. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/01/2010.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to:  U.S. Small Business Administration,  Processing and Disbursement Center,  14925 Kingsport Road,  Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 05/29/2009, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Ballard, Breathitt, Carlisle, Clay, Crittenden, Estill, Floyd, Fulton, Grayson, Hickman, Jackson, Knott, Lawrence, Lee, Leslie, Letcher, Madison, Magoffin, Marshall, Owsley, Perry, Pike, Russell, Trigg. *The Interest Rates are:* PercentOther (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit Available Elsewhere
4.500Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11796B and for economic injury is 11797B. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E9-15713 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 27, 2009 

l0518 

Order 

 

May 27, 2009 

138089 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138089 

 COA: 279713 

Wayne CC: 07-007377-01 

THADDEUS MARCELL WILLIAMS, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ William J. HoranWilliam J. Horan, Chairman, President and Director(Principal Executive Officer)Dated:  August 13, 2010
Saitta 

Adduct 

ibbons Pickering 

P.3d 922, 924 (2010) (providing that this court reviews the district court's 

denial of a writ petition for an abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

cc: Hon. Lidia Stiglich, District Judge 

Charles Joseph Maki 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A e
v.

THE HON. PHILIP J. MAENZA, et at., : STIPULATION OF

DISMISSAL & SUBSTITUTION

Defendants.

It is hereby STIPULATED by counsel for the respective parties that:

1. The claims of PlaintiffJeffrey M. Muller shall be and hereby are DISMISSED

with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a) ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;

2. Defendant The Hon. Philip J. Maenza, named in his Official Capacity as Judge of

the Superior Court of Morris County, shall be and hereby is DISMISSED as a

party to this action; and

3. ChiefRobert Jones, in his Official Capacity as Chief ofthe Hammonton, New

Jersey Police Department, shall be and hereby is SUBSTITUTED in place of

Chief Frank Ingemi as a Defendant in this action.

4.

David D. Jensen egory G. Spellmeyer

DAVID JENSEN PLLC Office ofthe Attorney General

61 Broadway, Suite 1900 R.J.H. Justice Complex Box 081

New York, New York 10006 25 Market Street

Tel: 212.380.6615 Trenton, NJ 08625-081

Fax: 917.591.1318 Tel: (609) 292-4478

david@djensenpllc.com Fax: (609) 984-9493

Atrorneyfor Plaint(ffs Gregory.Spellmeyerdol.lps.state.nj.us

Attorneyfor State Defendants
MeKeon, Wubbenhorst, Bucco& Appelt, P.C

P.O. Box 70Riverdale, NJ 07457

Tel: (973) 835-0100Fax: (973)835-1732roostdykjohnsonmurphylaw.com

Attorneyfor Defendant Chief

Richard Cook

It is SO ORDERED

P.O. Box 679

231 Bellevue Avenue

Hammonton, New Jersey 08037

Tel: (609) 567-2600Fax: (609) 561-6306howellbg@comcast.net

Attorneyfor Defendant ChiefFrank

ingemi and SubstitutedDefendant

ChiefRobert Jones

-2-
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Affinion Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Thomas A. Williams, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 31, 2008



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Thomas A. Williams                              
|Thomas A. Williams                                  
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         704
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  31,896
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,135
<INVENTORY>                                    21,429
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               59,226
<PP&E>                                         117,396
<DEPRECIATION>                                 56,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 179,518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          29,956
<BONDS>                                        109,827
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,000
<COMMON>                                       714
<OTHER-SE>                                     27,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   179,518
<SALES>                                        203,060
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               203,060
<CGS>                                          167,266
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  167,266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               20,483
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             9,707
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,604
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,603
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,001
<DISCONTINUED>                                 96
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (73)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,024
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.39
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NATURAL FASHIONS, INC., a California 

corporation, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

BEST OF KASHMIR, AKA BOK, AKA 

BOK Style; et al., 

Defendants-Appellants.

No. 16-15825 

D.C. No. 2:15-cv-00033-MCECMK 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 9, 2017**

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Appellants Shah Nawaz Farash, Shanu, and Best of Kashmir appeal pro se 

from the district court’s order denying their motion to set aside entry of default in 

this copyright infringement action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 17 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-15825 

We review for an abuse of discretion the district court’s denial of a motion to set 

aside entry of default under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c). Franchise 

Holding II, LLC v. Huntington Restaurants Grp., Inc., 375 F.3d 922, 925 (9th Cir. 

2004). We affirm.

In their opening brief, appellants failed to challenge any of the district 

court’s grounds for denying their motion to set aside entry of default, and therefore 

appellants have waived any such challenge. See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. 

Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e will not consider any claims 

that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief.”); Smith v. Marsh, 194 

F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[A]rguments not raised by a party in its opening 

brief are deemed waived.”). We therefore do not reach the merits of this case.

To the extent that Best of Kashmir is a business entity and not an assumed 

name for Shah Nawaz Farash, we dismiss Best of Kashmir’s appeal because 

Farash, a non-attorney, may not represent a business entity. See United States v. 

High Country Broad. Co., 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993) (“A corporation may 

appear in federal court only through licensed counsel.”); C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. 

United States, 818 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir. 1987) (“Although a non-attorney may 

appear in propria persona in his own behalf, that privilege is personal to him. He 

has no authority to appear as an attorney for others than himself.” (citations 

omitted)).
3 16-15825 

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Appellants’ request for an order requiring the parties to submit fabric 

samples, set forth in the opening brief, is denied.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metals USA Holdings Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009
(the Periodic Report), I, C. Lourenco Goncalves, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. To my knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                              |  |                                                            
|------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    C. LOURENCO
GONCALVES
|                    |  |  |  |                              |  | C. Lourenco Goncalves President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6002
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GARFIELD ANTHONY WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CR91-456-WMN, CA-95-1914-WMN) Submitted: February 20, 1996 Decided: March 19, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Garfield Anthony Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Douglas Bennett, Christine Manuelian, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Williams , Nos. CR-91-456-WMN; CA-95-1914-WMN (D. Md. Nov 29, 1995).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Rail Employer Reporting Instructions

Part VIII - Employer Reporting System (ERS) Internet User Instructions

Chapter 3b: How to Initiate Service and Compensation Reports

 Form BA-6a, Form BA-6 Address Report 

1

BA-6a Initiated by Employer

Employers are responsible to annually report addresses for new hires in the previous year. Address 

changes are reported by the employee, not the employer. 

Click BA-6a under the Forms menu. This brings up a blank BA-6a screen. Enter the employee 

identifying data as usual. Keep in mind that these are new hires and, as such, may be new records 

at the RRB. Entry of a middle initial is optional. Type the address information and click the 

approve button. 

Process Buttons

1. Approve - click this to process the completed BA-6a and certify the data to the RRB.

2. Reset - click this to clear your address entries.

3. Cancel - click this to exit the BA-6a process without updating an address.

4. Delete - click this to delete the BA-6a form.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

KENWOOD APPLIANCES LUXEMBOURG, 

S.A,

Plaintiff,

vs.

HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., CHINA 

SINGFUN ELECTRIC GROUP CO., LTD., 

KENWORLD INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 2:10-cv-06356-SRC-MAS

Hon. Stanley R. Chesler

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

(Electronically Filed Document)

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Trent S. Dickey, Esq. of Sills Cummis & Gross P.C. 

hereby appears on behalf of defendants China Singfun Electric Group Co., Ltd. and Kenworld 

International Co., Ltd., in the above-captioned action.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that defendants China Singfun Electric Group Co., 

Ltd. and Kenworld International Co., Ltd. reserve, and specifically do not waive, any and all of 

their defenses, including, but not limited to, lack of personal jurisdiction.

SILLS CUMMIS EPSTEIN & GROSS P.C.

One Riverfront Plaza

Newark, New Jersey 07102-5400

Telephone: (973) 643-7000

Facsimile: (973) 643-6500

email: tdickey@sillscummis.com

BY: s/ Trent S. Dickey__________

 TRENT S. DICKEY

Attorneys for Defendant China Singfun 

Electric Group Co., Ltd.

Dated: April 28, 2011

Case 2:10-cv-06356-SRC -MAS Document 16 Filed 04/29/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 114
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 26, 2016

s1017

Order 

Clerk

October 26, 2016

152152 & (11)(12)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 152152

COA: 325621

Wayne CC: 89-014558-FC

EVERETT DYSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to add issues is GRANTED. The application for 

leave to appeal the June 22, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is 

DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement 

to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to remand is DENIED.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Christopher Renfroe, on Behalf of Philip Casimir, Petitioner, v Warden, Respondent.

[855 NYS2d 371]

The determination of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” *(People ex rel. Klein v Krueger,*25 NY2d 497, 499 [1969]; *see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson,*48 NY2d 230 [1979]). Rivera, J.P., Lifson, Florio and Chambers, JJ., concur.