alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 712 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 19, 2019. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. Brindisi. 

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Lamb. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, ranked as follows on the following standing committees of the House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY: 

Mr. Lamb (to rank immediately after Ms. Wexton). 

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS AFFAIRS: Mr. Brindisi (to 

rank immediately after Ms. Underwood). 

Attest: 

Clerk.
# table14a_q5_state

# table14b_q5_state

# table14c_q5_state
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 969 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 969

              Recognizing ``National Public Works Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2020

 Ms. Craig (for herself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, and Ms. Titus) submitted the 
     following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
              Recognizing ``National Public Works Week''.

Whereas public works professionals focus on infrastructure, facilities, and 
        services that are of vital importance to sustainable and resilient 
        communities and to the public health, high quality of life, and well-
        being of the United States of America;
Whereas such infrastructure, facilities, and services could not be provided 
        without the dedicated efforts of public works professionals, who are 
        engineers, managers, and employees of Federal, State, and local 
        government and the private sector, and who are responsible for 
        rebuilding, improving, and protecting our Nation's transportation, water 
        supply, water treatment and solid waste systems, public buildings, and 
        other structures and facilities essential for our citizens;
Whereas public works professionals have continued to provide these essential 
        services during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, placing themselves at 
        increased risk of infection;
Whereas it is in the public interest for citizens, civic leaders, and children 
        of the United States to gain knowledge of, and to maintain a progressive 
        interest and understanding of, the importance of public works and public 
        works programs in their respective communities; and
Whereas the week of May 17 through May 23, 2020, marks the 60th annual 
        ``National Public Works Week'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports ``National 
Public Works Week'' and encourages the people of the United States to 
pay tribute to our public works professionals, engineers, managers, and 
employees and to recognize the substantial contributions they make to 
protecting our national health, safety, and quality of life.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32**
 
 **Certification of Periodic Financial Report**
 **** **Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**
 
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Criticare Systems, Inc. (the "Company") certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date: September 28, 2004
 
 /s/ Emil H. Soika
 
 Emil H. Soika, Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 Date: September 28, 2004
 
 /s/ Joel D. Knudson
 
 Joel D. Knudson, Vice President - Finance
 
 
 This Certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-50126

Summary Calendar

 

RODERICK LYN BARNES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-99-CV-58

--------------------

September 29, 2000

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roderick Lyn Barnes, TDCJ #607656, has filed an application

for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal, following

the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. 

By moving for IFP, Barnes is challenging the district court’s

certification that IFP should not be granted on appeal because

his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117

F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Barnes argues that the district

court erred in construing his complain as arising out of 42

U.S.C. § 1983 because the loss of his trusty class status
No. 00-50126

-2-

affected his release date and deprived him of the accrual of

extra good time credits, that the district court erred by

applying the incorrect law in deciding that Barnes failed to

state a claim, and that the district court abused its discretion

in denying his motion to amend.

The district court erred when it construed Barnes’ claim as

coming under § 1983 because Barnes’ claim should have been

construed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas

corpus. See Malchi v. Thaler, 211 F.3d 953, 956 (5th Cir. 2000). 

The district court did not err in finding that Barnes failed to

state a claim because a prisoner does not have a constitutionally

cognizable claim for the right to a particular time-earning

status. See Id. at 959. The district court did not abuse its

discretion in denying Barnes’ motion to amend because the

amendment would have been futile. See FDIC v. Conner, 20 F.3d

1376, 1385 (5th Cir. 1994).

The district court’s certification that Barnes’ appeal was

not taken in good faith was not error, and the appeal is

dismissed. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 and n.24. 

 IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned President and Sole
Executive Officer of 4net Software, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies, that to his
knowledge:

         1) the Company's Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended September 30,
         2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2) the information contained in the Company's Form 10-KSB for the
         annual period ended September 30, 2004 fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
         Company.


December 21, 2006


                                            /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Steven N. Bronson, President
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, John B. Walker, certify that:1 I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10–Q of EV Energy Partners, L.P.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(e) and15d–15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) [Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 34–47986];  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date:November 14, 2006 /s/ JOHN B. WALKER         John B. Walker    Chief Executive Officer of EV Management LLC,    general partner of EV Energy GP, L.P.,    general partner of EV Energy Partners, L.P.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: PETER EMANUEL KVASSAY,

Debtor,

------------------------------

PETER EMANUEL KVASSAY,

Appellant,

 v.

ROBERT V. KVASSAY, individually and

as Trustee of the Kvassay Family Trust

dated February 26, 1993,

Appellee.

No. 19-60012

BAP No. 18-1148

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

Taylor, Faris, and Kurtz, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted April 15, 2020** 

Pasadena, California

FILED

MAY 4 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and FERNANDEZ and W. FLETCHER, Circuit

Judges.

Peter Emanuel Kvassay appeals the bankruptcy appellate panel’s (“BAP”)

decision affirming the bankruptcy court’s grant of summary judgment against him

in his adversary proceeding against Robert V. Kvassay. We affirm for the reasons

set forth in the BAP’s excellent memorandum disposition,1 which we adopt. 

AFFIRMED.

1 Kvassay v. Kvassay (In re Kvassay), No. CC-18-1148-TaFKu, 2019 WL

545673 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. Feb. 11, 2019).

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
registrant's consolidated financial statements for the year ended November
30, 1996 and is qualified in it's entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                              13
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    26580
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (2307)
<INVENTORY>                                      15990
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 40958
<PP&E>                                          185563
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (93956)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  151370
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            39707
<BONDS>                                          36264
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                       75340
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    151370
<SALES>                                         145209
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                145209
<CGS>                                           149445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   149445
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   578
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1498
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (14922)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (14922)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14922)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.52)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 29, 2013

t0422 

# Order

April 29, 2013

146529

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146529

COA: 306030

Wayne CC: 11

- 003376

- FC

SANDY MELVIN QUICK,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 27, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 23.1

 

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors

RehabCare Group, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No. 33-43236 on Form S-8, registration statement No. 33-67944 on Form S-8, registration statement No. 33-82106 on Form S-8, registration statement No. 33-82048 on Form S-8, registration statement No. 333-11311 on Form S-8, and registration statement No. 333-120005 on Form S-8 of RehabCare Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 13, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of RehabCare Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over finanical reporting as of December 31, 2005which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of RehabCare Group, Inc.

Our report makes reference to our reliance on the report of other auditors as it relates to the amounts included for InteliStaf Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ KPMG LLP

St. Louis, Missouri

March 13, 2006

 

 

1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Magic LanternGroup, Inc., formerly named JKC Group, Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-K forthe period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Dale P. Kearns,Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

            1.            The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as ofthe date and for the periods reported therein.

 

| */s/ Dale P. Kearns*            |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   |
| Dale P. Kearns                  |   |
| Interim Chief Financial Officer |   |
| April 15, 2003                  |   |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Magic Lantern Group, Inc. and will be retained by Magic LanternGroup, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.
#### Esther York, Appellant, v Joseph York, Respondent.

Submitted July 8, 2013;

decided September 3, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Exhibit 10.2 for Royal Finance Inc



EXHIBIT 10.2

                          EMPLOYMENT AND FEE AGREEMENT
                          ----------------------------

     THIS AGREEMENT made this 17th day of December, 2001, by and between Royal
Finance, Inc. (hereinafter "CLIENT") with a mailing address of 1481 South
Military Trail, Suite 12, West Palm Beach, Florida 33415 and telephone number
(561) 649-3901 and Richard P. Greene, P.A. (hereinafter "ATTORNEY").

     1. CLIENT retains ATTORNEY to represent CLIENT as Attorney at Law regarding
Corporate/Securities related matters and authorizes and empowers ATTORNEY to do
all things reasonably necessary to complete corporate and securities
transactions with CLIENT'S consent (other than in connection with capital
raising transactions) and agrees to retain attorney for the services rendered on
the following terms and conditions:

     a.   On the basis of the time expended by ATTORNEY, a retainer shall
          consist of 2,500 shares of common stock of Royal Finance, Inc. All
          referenced shares shall be registered pursuant to a Registration
          Statement on Form S-8.
     b.   CLIENT shall also be responsible for costs incurred including, but not
          limited to, long distance phone calls, transcripts, photocopies,
          postage, filing fees, and costs of newspaper publications.  Advanced
          costs that are not expended during the course of the representation
          are to be returned to the client at the conclusion of the
          representation, unless ATTORNEY and CLIENT agree otherwise in writing.

     2. ATTORNEY will render a final statement for services rendered and costs
incurred. If CLIENT disagrees with any charge for fees or costs, CLIENT must
notify ATTORNEY in writing within ten (10) days after the date of mailing.
Otherwise, all charges are agreed by CLIENT to be approved and accepted. All
bills are due when rendered.

     3.  CLIENT understands and agrees that ATTORNEY has made no  guarantee
regarding the successful outcome or termination of the engagement and all
expressions pertaining thereto are matters of opinion. Should it be necessary to
institute legal proceedings for the collection of any part of the ATTORNEY'S
compensation or costs as set forth above, then CLIENT agrees to pay all court
costs and reasonable attorneys fees with regard to the collection of same.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the date first
mentioned above.

ACCEPTED:
Richard P. Greene, P.A.                 Royal Finance, Inc.

By: /s/ Richard P. Greene               By:  /s/ Douglas Meyers
------------------------------          -----------------------------------
Richard P. Greene                       Douglas Meyers, CEO
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 12-1150

_____________

JOHN M. DRAKE; GREGORY C. GALLAHER; 

LENNY S. SALERNO; FINLEY FENTON; 

SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC.; 

ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY RIFLE & PISTOL CLUBS, INC.,

 Appellants

v.

THE HON. RUDOLPH A. FILKO, 

in his Official Capacity as Judge of the Superior Court of Passaic County; 

HON. EDWARD A. JEREJIAN, 

in his Official Capacity as Judge of the Superior Court of Bergen County; 

THE HON. THOMAS V. MANAHAN, 

in his Official Capacity as Judge of the Superior Court of Morris County;

SUPERINTENDENT NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE; CHIEF RICHARD COOK, 

in his Official Capacity as Chief of the Montville, New Jersey Police Department; 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY; ROBERT JONES, 

in his Official Capacity as Chief of the Hammonton, New Jersey Police Department

__________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(D.C. Civil No. 2-10-cv-06110)

District Judge: Honorable William H. Walls

__________

Argued February 12, 2013

Before: HARDIMAN and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges, and STARK, District Judge.

__________

 



The Honorable Leonard P. Stark, Judge of the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware, sitting by designation.

Case 2:10-cv-06110-WHW-MCA Document 45 Filed 07/31/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 445
2

JUDGMENT

__________

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court 

for the District of New Jersey and was argued on February 12, 2013.

On consideration whereof, it is now hereby ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the 

judgment of the District Court entered January 13, 2012 be and the same is hereby 

affirmed.

All of the above in accordance with the opinion of this Court. Costs taxed to 

Appellants. 

ATTEST:

/s/ Marcia M. Waldron

Clerk

DATED: July 31, 2013

Case 2:10-cv-06110-WHW-MCA Document 45 Filed 07/31/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 446