alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Susser Holdings Corporation (the Company) for the three months ended June 29,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mary E. Sullivan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |    |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 17, 2009 |  |   
|                        |  |   
|                        |  | By |  | /s/ Mary E. Sullivan                                
|                        |  |    |  | Mary E. Sullivan                                    
|                        |  |    |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q/A pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 21, 2015

No. 04-14-00886-CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, ET. AL.,

Appellants

v.

HAYS STREET BRIDGE RESTORATION GROUP, ET. AL.,

Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-19589

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On April 17, 2015, Appellant filed Appellant’s Joint Motion to Abate. This court denied 

the motion and ordered Appellant to file a report with this court no later than June 22, 2015 

regarding the status of settlement negotiations. As per our order, on June 22, 2015, Appellant 

filed a report on mediation asserting that the “undersigned do not anticipate that a settlement is 

possible in the near term, although the City intends to continue to work towards an amicable 

resolution. We ORDER Appellee Hays Street Bridge Restoration Group to provide a response to 

this court no later than July 31, 2015 regarding Appellee’s position on Appellant’s settlement 

negotiations status and a determination whether Appellee believes the parties are realistically 

moving toward settlement.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
RCM 5.5

RCM 5.5 Current Connection Revised May 9, 2017 Page 1 of 1

Refer to FOM1 225 for Current Connection information.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 622 

Expressing support for designation of the week of October 6, 2019, through 

October 12, 2019, as ‘‘Latex Allergy Awareness Week’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2019 

Mr. ENGEL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of the week of October 

6, 2019, through October 12, 2019, as ‘‘Latex Allergy 

Awareness Week’’. 

Whereas incidences of latex allergies have increased due to 

widespread exposure to products containing latex rubber 

allergen; 

Whereas latex allergies can be elicited by touching a product 

containing natural rubber latex, breathing airborne latex 

protein particles, or digesting food prepared using latex 

gloves; 

Whereas those who suffer from latex allergies commonly suffer from cross-reactive food allergies or asthma; 

Whereas latex allergies can be prevented by avoiding all latexrelated products which can be found in health care enviVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:45 Oct 08, 2019 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR622.IH HR622

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 622 IH 

ronments, restaurants, childcare facilities, workplaces, 

schools, communities, and homes; and 

Whereas the week of October 6, 2019, through October 12, 

2019, would be appropriate to designate as ‘‘Latex Allergy Awareness Week’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of ‘‘Latex Allergy Awareness Week’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 799 

Supporting efforts to preserve Vietnamese and Vietnamese-American heritage 

and history and recognizing the accomplishments and contributions of 

Vietnamese Americans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2020 

Mr. ROUDA (for himself, Mr. BUDD, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Ms. PORTER, Mr. 

VARGAS, Mrs. DAVIS of California, and Ms. LOFGREN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting efforts to preserve Vietnamese and VietnameseAmerican heritage and history and recognizing the accomplishments and contributions of Vietnamese Americans. 

Whereas the 2010 Census showed that more than 1,500,000 

Vietnamese Americans live in the United States of America; 

Whereas many Vietnamese refugees resettled in the United 

States during the late 20th century as they fled Vietnam 

after the Vietnam war; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 799 IH 

Whereas thousands of Vietnamese-American families have 

lived in the United States for decades, now comprised of 

multiple generations of foreign-born and United Statesborn individuals; 

Whereas the number of elderly Vietnamese Americans is rapidly increasing, and over nine in ten Vietnamese Americans aged 65 or older are foreign-born; 

Whereas Vietnamese Americans make significant contributions to our Nation every day through their public service, their involvement in the American economy, and their 

engagement in our communities; 

Whereas it is important and necessary for current and future 

generations of Americans to understand and appreciate 

the cultural history of Vietnamese Americans; and 

Whereas the history of the Vietnamese-American population 

is the story of so many Americans who have fled violence 

and oppression and come to the United States in search 

of a better life: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports efforts to preserve Vietnamese3 American history and heritage through the collection 

4 and preservation of testimonies and artifacts that 

5 document Vietnamese and Vietnamese-American his6 tory; 

7 (2) recognizes the importance of the United 

8 States Refugee Admissions Program, through which 

9 many Vietnamese Americans have gained entry and 

10 permanent status in the United States; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 799 IH 

1 (3) condemns human rights violations per2 petrated by the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and 

3 calls upon the Vietnamese Government to end re4 strictions of basic human rights, allow all individuals 

5 to speak freely, exercise their faith without fear of 

6 persecution, and enjoy the freedoms that all humans 

7 should enjoy. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.1**

**MANAGEMENTCERTIFICATION**

I, Philip O. Nolan, certify that:

1.           Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stanley, Inc.;

2.           Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.           Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.           The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)         Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)          Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.           The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
|                          |   | /s/ PHILIP O. NOLAN                     |
|--------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| Date: February 12,  2007 |   | Philip O. Nolan                         |
|                     |   | Chairman, President and Chief Executive |
|                     |   | Officer                                 |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Russell A. Olson, Chief Financial Officer of Intcomex, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 14, 2010



/s/ Russell A. OlsonRussell A. OlsonChief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7316** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. MONTARIUS MURRY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Rebecca Beach Smith , Chief District Judge. ( 2:11

- cr - 00073

- RBS

- FBS

- 1; 2:13

- cv - 00389

- RBS; 2:13

- cv - 00225

- RBS

- DEM )

Submitted : January 6, 2014 Decided: January 14, 2014

Before MOTZ, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Montarius Murry, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin L. Hatch, Assistant United States Attorney, V. Kathleen Dougherty, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinion s are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Montarius Murry seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (201 2 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifi cate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 )
. When the district court denies relief on the m erits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutiona l right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Murry has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the ap peal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
# Instructions

# Form

REPORT OF STOCK OPTIONS AND OTHER PAYMENTS(SEE INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THIS FORM BELOW)The purpose of this report is to obtain information on non-qualified stock options (NQSOs) and other payments for railroad employees.  This information is required for the computation of the Financial Interchange with the Social Security Administration and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.  This report is required by law under Section 7(b)(6) of the Railroad Retirement Act.  Failure to report or the making of a false or fraudulent report can result in criminal prosecution or civil penalties or both.FORM G-440, REPORT SPECIFICATIONS SHEET, MUST ACCOMPANY THIS FORM.

# Data Layout
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Form 10-Q of Funtalk China Holdings Limited (the
“Company”) for the three months period ended June 30, 2009, as amended, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Dongping Fei, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period
certified.




/s/
      Dongping FeiDongping
      FeiChief
      Executive OfficerDecember 10,
      2009
| **CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Ricardo Prats, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Ocean Electric Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company, for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

 

(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

By:

*/s/ Ricardo Prats*

 

Name:

Ricardo Prats

 

Title:

Chief Executive Officer and

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

Date:

November 27, 2012
                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
An unpublish

‘Supreme Court
oF
NEVADA

(0) 904 <B>

led order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DONALD FRANCIS FISHER, No. 67181

ve. Appellant, F | L E D

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent. JUL 2 4 205
CIE INDEMAN
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL py
TY CLERK

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction. Third
Judicial District Court, Lyon County; William Rogers, Judge.

Appellant’s counsel has filed a notice of voluntary withdrawal
of this appeal. Counsel advises this court that he has informed appellant
of the legal consequences of voluntarily withdrawing this appeal, including
that appellant cannot hereafter seek to reinstate this appeal, and that any
issues that were or could have been brought in this appeal are forever
waived. Having been so informed, appellant consents to a voluntary

dismissal of this appeal. Cause appearing, we

ORDER this  .
J Cm Den pore,

Ww

Parraguirre

Lowe , Cheam,

Douglas a Cherry

cc: Hon. William Rogers, District Judge
Anne W. Laughlin
Attorney General/Carson City
Lyon County District Attorney
Third District Court Clerk
Donald Francis Fisher

Ie DOSS.
S ee T EX . R. A PP . P. 52. 8( d) ( " W hen deny ing r elief, t he c our t m ay han d do wn a n op inion but is not 1 r e q u i r e d to d o s o .") ; T EX . R. A PP . P
. 4 7
. 4 (di s t i n g u i s h i n g o p i n i o n s a n d m e m o ran d u m o p i n i o n s ).

P urs uant t o order , t he real par t y in int ere s t ’ s res pons e t o t he p et it ion f or wr it of m andam us was 2 or igina lly due on M ay 9, 200 8. T he real par t y in int eres t f

iled a m ot ion or ex t ens ion of t im e t o f ile his r es pons e unt il M ay 14, 200 8, and t he s am e wa s f iled on M ay 14, 200 8. T he C o u r t herein G RA NT S t his m ot ion f or 

### NU MBE R 1 3 - 0 8 - 0 0 2 3 7 - CV 

## C O U R T OF A P P E A LS T H I R T EEN T H D I ST R I C T O F TEXAS CO RPUS CHRI ST I - EDI NBURG

__________________ __________________ __________________ ______ I N RE BRA NDI FRA

ZI ER

__________________ __________________ __________________ ______ O n Pet i t i on for

W r i tof M andam us

__________________ __________________ __________________ ______ MEMOR A ND UM OP I NI ON B efore C hief

Justi ce Valdez

an d Ju st i ces G arza a nd B en avides M em or andum O pi ni on Per Cur i am 1 Rel ator , B r

an di Fraz i er , fi l ed a pet i t i onf or w r i t of m an dam u s i nt h e abov e c au se on A pr i l 3, 2006, as ki n g t h i s C ou r t to c om pel t h e respon den t , t h e H on or abl e M ar i sel a S al dan a, P resi di n g J u dge of

t h e 148t hD i st r i ct

C ou r t of N u eces C ou n t

y , to v acate a tem por

ar y or der si gn ed onD ecem ber

5, 2007. T h e C ou r

t r equ ested an d r

ecei v ed a respon se fr

om t h e r eal par t y i ni n ter est , Jo h nLon gor i a, an d on e h as beenfi l ed. 2e x te n s i o n o f ti m e . 

### 2 T h e C o u rt , h a vi n g e x

a mi n e d a n d f

u l l y c o n s i d e re d t h e p e ti ti o nf o r w ri t o f ma n d a mu s an d t h e r espon se, i s o f

t h e opi n i ont h at r e l a t o r h as n ot sh ow nh er

sel f en t i t l ed to t h e r

el i ef s o u g h t, a n d th e p e ti ti o nfo r w ri t o f ma n d a mu s s h o u l d b e d e n i e d
. S ee T EX . R. A PP . P
. 52. 8. A c c o rd i n g l y , t h e p e ti ti o nfo r w ri t o f ma n d a mu s i s D E N I E D
. P E R C U R I A M M em or an du m O pi n i ondel i v

er ed an d f i l ed t h i s 9 t hday

of Ju n e, 2008.