alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT24**

 

OWENS-ILLINOISGROUP, INC.

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESEPRESENTS: That each individual whose signature appears below hereby consents toand appoints James W. Baehren as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agentwith all power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, inany and all capacities, to sign the 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K ofOwens-Illinois Group, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under thelaws of the State of Delaware, and any and all amendments thereto, and to filethe same, with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection therewith,with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the requirements of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agentfull power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the same as fully to allintents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying andconfirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitute orsubstitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, eachof the undersigned has hereunto set his hand on the date set opposite his name.

 
| **Signature**              | ** ** | **Title**                                                | ** ** | **Date**                |
|----------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------|
|                       |       |                                                     |       |                    |
| /s/  Albert P.L. Stroucken |       | Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer                    |       | February 10,  2010 |
| Albert  P.L. Stroucken     |       | (Principal  Executive Officer)                           |       |                    |
|                       |       |                                                     |       |                    |
| /s/  Edward C. White       |       | President  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer); |       | February 10,  2010 |
| Edward  C. White           |       | Director                                                 |       |                    |
|                       |       |                                                     |       |                    |
| /s/  James W. Baehren      |       | Vice  President and Secretary; Director                  |       | February 10,  2010 |
| James  W. Baehren          |       |                                                     |       |                    |
|                       |       |                                                     |       |                    |
| /s/  L. Richard Crawford   |       | Director                                                 |       | February 10,  2010 |
| L.  Richard Crawford       |       |                                                     |       |                    |

 

----
1

NOT FOR PUBLICATION (Doc. No. 9) 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

CAMDEN VICINAGE

___________________________________ 

: 

NADUVATHUSERY JOSEPH, : 

Individually and on behalf of himself and : 

those similarly situated, : 

: 

Plaintiff, : Civil No. 10-6293 (RBK/AMD) 

: 

v. : ORDER

: 

CAESAR’S ENTERTAINMENT CORP. : 

and HARRAH’S OPERATING : 

COMPANY INC., : 

: 

Defendants. : 

___________________________________ : 

THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon the motion by Defendants Caesar’s 

Entertainment Corporation and Harrah’s Operating Company Inc., pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 12(f) to dismiss and/or strike all class action allegations from the 

Complaint filed by Plaintiff Naduvathusery Joseph; and the Court having considered the moving 

papers and the response thereto; and for the reasons expressed in the Opinion issued this date; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion is GRANTED; and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s New Jersey Wage Payment Law 

(“NJWPL”), N.J. Stat. Ann. § 34:11-4.1 et seq., and New Jersey Wage Payment and Hour Law 

(“NJWHL”), N.J. Stat. Ann. § 34:11-56a et seq., claims are DISMISSED. 

 

Date: 7/21/2011 /s/ Robert B. Kugler 

 ROBERT B. KUGLER 

 United States District Judge 

Case 1:10-cv-06293-AMD Document 21 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 282
2

Case 1:10-cv-06293-AMD Document 21 Filed 07/21/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 283
The State of 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 17, 2015

No. 04-15-00199-CR

Gabriel JIMENEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR0420

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The court reporter’s extension of time to file the reporter’s record is GRANTED. Because 

Amy Hinds Alvarado has been given an extension of time of 75 days, no further extension will 

be allowed.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
ACCEPTED

06-15-00076-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

7/27/2015 10:30:42 AM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 7/27/2015 10:30:42 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 961 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the President 

should work with the Government of the United Kingdom to prepare 

for a future free trade agreement between the United States and the 

United Kingdom. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2020 

Mr. MURPHY of North Carolina submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the President should work with the Government of the 

United Kingdom to prepare for a future free trade agreement between the United States and the United Kingdom. 

Whereas, on March 5, 1946, Sir Winston Churchill delivered 

the Iron Curtain speech in Fulton, Missouri, solidifying 

the ‘‘Special Relationship’’ between the United States 

and the United Kingdom; 

Whereas, since the end of World War II, the United States 

and the United Kingdom have been beacons of freedom 

to the world, standing together in the fight against tyranny; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 961 IH 

Whereas the Special Relationship between the United States 

and the United Kingdom has enabled economic prosperity 

and security cooperation for both countries for more than 

70 years; 

Whereas, on June 23, 2016, the people of the United Kingdom voted in support of a referendum to leave the European Union; 

Whereas the United Kingdom is an important trading partner with the United States, with $232,000,000,000 in 

goods traded between the two countries in 2017; 

Whereas, on October 16, 2018, the United States Trade Representative expressed the intention of the President to negotiate a free trade agreement between the two countries 

after the United Kingdom leaves the European Union; 

and 

Whereas the constitutional power of making treaties with foreign nations includes both the legislative and executive 

branches: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) the United States should have a close and 

4 mutually beneficial trading and economic partner5 ship with the United Kingdom without interruption; 

6 and 

7 (2) the President, with the support of Congress, 

8 should lay the groundwork for a future trade agreeVerDate Sep 11 2014 17:09 May 09, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR961.IH HR961

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 961 IH 

1 ment between the United States and the United 

2 Kingdom. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Primoris Services Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian Pratt, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



In
witness whereof, the undersigned has executed and delivered this certificate as of the date set forth opposite his signature below.

Date: May 13, 2009

/s/ BRIAN PRATT Brian Pratt Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President


---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONBY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Pinnacle Gas Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending September 30,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Ronald T. Barnes, Senior Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and Secretary of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  November 14,  2008 |                                   |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                |                                   |
|                                | /s/ Ronald  T. Barnes                  |
|                                | Ronald T. Barnes                       |
|                                | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial |
|                                | Officer and Secretary                  |

 

----
#### HARGREAVES v. ROXY THEATRE, Inc.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Oct. 7, 1940.

Wolf & Kohn, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Robert E. Curran, of New York City, for defendant.

HULBERT, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves for an order under Rule 39(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for a trial by jury of the issues in this action and directing that the action be transferred to and placed on the jury calendar.

The action is to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of the defendant’s negligence. Issue was joined by the filing of defendant’s answer on August 29, 1940 and the clerk thereupon placed the action on the non jury calendar.

The right of trial by jury as declared by the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution or as given by a statute of the United States is preserved by Rule 38, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which, however, requires service of “a demand therefor in writing at any time after the commencement of the action and not later than 10 days after the service of the last pleading”. In addition thereto, Rule 39 (b) invests a discretionary power in the court.

The attorney for the plaintiff states in his moving affidavit, verified September 20, 1940, that he learned for the first time, on that date that neither the plaintiff nor the defendant had demanded a jury trial as provided in Rule 38 (b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, although he had given directions that such demand should be timely made.

The fact that Rule 6 (b) (2) permits the act to be done after the expiration of the specified period where the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect, further indicates that in the adpotion and promulgation of the New Rules, the Supreme Court intended that the rigid provisions of Rule 38 (b) might be relaxed upon a proper showing, in the discretion of the court, and it appears to be the intent and practice to construe the provisions of the Rules to render substantial justice.

Civil actions to recover damages for alleged negligence are invariably tried hy the court to a jury.

The plaintiff’s time to serve a demand under Rule 38 (b) did not ex*538pire until ten days from the service of the answer. The defendant’s answer was served by mail on August 28, 1940. In some jurisdictions service by mail doubles the time; in others, the time is extended for a given number of days. Rule 6 (e), Federal Rules of Civil Practice, adds three days to the prescribed period. It does not appear that the defendant has suffered, or will suffer, any prejudice or the loss of any substantive right and the court should not be too prone to deprive a litigant of a trial by jury because of an error or omission on the part of the agent of her attorney to whom she has entrusted her case; where the act or omission is excusable.

Upon the particular facts in this case the motion will be granted.
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - August 2008 

Benefit payments August 2008 August 2007 

Regular Retirement 

and Survivor Benefits 

Total 

Retired employ

Spouses and d

Widow(er)s - ag

Other survivors 

ees 

ivorced spouses 

ed and disabled 

$837,515,000 

556,034,000 

101,954,000 

156,513,000 

23,015,000 

$815,411,000 

537,339,000 

97,820,000 

157,292,000 

22,960,000 

Average under 

Being paid Awarded in Social Security 

Monthly benefits end of month month August 2008 

Number Average1 Number Average1 Being Paid Awarded 

Total 566,100 ......... 2,800 ......... ......... .........

Regular employee annuities, total 275,300 $2,005 1,200 $2,667 ......... .........

 Age 191,200 1,977 2 700 2 3,146 $1,086 3 $1,526

 Disability, Full Retirement Age and Over 34,300 1,784 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Disability, Under Full Retirement Age 49,800 2,265 300 2,562 1,004 1,054 

Spouses and divorced spouses 136,300 740 900 934 519 388 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 128,800 1,212 500 1,638 1,027 840 

Widowed mothers and fathers 800 1,518 4/ 1,996 788 776 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 14,100 807 100 823 5/ 5/ 

Children 10,700 878 4/ 1,209 706 702 

Other survivors 100 516 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Benefit payments 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

August 

2008 

$5,048,000 

August 

2007 

$5,064,000 

Number 

120,800 

Average 

$42 

Number 

700 

Average 

$41 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement. 

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 35); about 300

 other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis. 

4

Fewer than 50. 

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers. 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. 

Regular retirement and survivor benefit payments total includes hospital insurance benefits for services in Canada. 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

August 2008 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Average payment 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period

 Per

 full week 

Unemployment 2,600 $539 $302 

Sickness 

Unemployment

 Sickness 

Total 

5,400 542 

August 2008 

1,761,000 

$5,886,000 

4,125,000 

Benefit payments 

302 

August 2007 

$8,182,000 

1,324,000 

6,858,000 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited). Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary 

Recycled

 Paper
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

# TIME AND DATE:

11:30 a.m., Monday, July 6, 2009.

# PLACE:

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve System employees.

2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-2955.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                        You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at                         *http://www.federalreserve.gov*                         for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting.                    

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 26, 2009.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E9-15558 Filed 6-26-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
# table109_q13.2_naics
@article{109061,
  author = {Gale Holmes and R Peterson and Donald Hunston and Walter McDonough},
  title = {E-Glass/DGEBA/m-PDA Single Fiber Composites: Interface Debonding During Fiber Fracture},
  year = {2007},
  number = {28},
  month = {2007-10-01},
  publisher = {Polymer Composites},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=851929},
  language = {en},
}
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906**

**of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Primoris Services Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter J. Moerbeek, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

In witness whereof, the undersigned has executed and delivered this certificate as of the date set forth opposite his signature below.

 
| Date:   May 10, 2011 | /s/   PETER J. MOERBEEK                                                                |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | Peter   J. Moerbeek *Executive Vice President, Chief Financial   Officer and Director* |

 

----
Filed 7/21/15 P. v. Allums CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

 Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

DENNIS ALLUMS,

 Defendant and Appellant.

2d Crim. No. B259621

(Super. Ct. No. NA098909)

(Los Angeles County)

Dennis Allums appeals the order revoking his probation and sentencing him 

to eight years in state prison. The court had previously imposed and suspended execution 

of the sentence following appellant's guilty plea to possessing a controlled substance 

(Health & Saf. Code, § 11377) and his admission that he had served five prior prison 

terms (Pen. Code, § 667, subd. (b)). 

After appellant filed his notice of appeal, he filed a petition for resentencing 

under Proposition 47, the Safe Neighborhood and Schools Act (Pen. Code, § 1170.18). 

The court granted the petition, reduced appellant's conviction to a misdemeanor, and 

ordered him to serve 364 days in jail with credit for time served. 

We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After counsel's 

examination of the record, he filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised. We 
2

subsequently advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit 

any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. We received no response.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's 

attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. 

(People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 

126.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

PERREN, J.

We concur:

GILBERT, P. J.

YEGAN, J.
3

Laura Laecke, Judge

Superior Court County of Los Angeles

______________________________

David Cohen, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant 

and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.