alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION









Exhibit 10.25




 




Amendment to the




 




SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE

RETIREMENT BONUS PLAN




FOR SCHNITZER STEEL

INDUSTRIES, INC.




AND AFFILIATED EMPLOYERS




 




 




WHEREAS, Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. (hereinafter referred to the

Employer) did previously adopt the Supplemental Executive Retirement Bonus Plan

for Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. and Affiliated Employers (the “Plan”);

and,




 




WHEREAS, the Employer reserved the right to amend said Plan under

Section 3.1; and the Plan was last amended and restated in its entirety

effective as of January 1, 2000;




 




WHEREAS, a further amendment is now deemed desirable in order to

clarify Employer intent with regard to interpreting a part of the Plan’s

benefit formula that has been made ambiguous with the enactment of Economic

Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) and the resultant

change in Code Section 401(a)(17);




 




 




NOW, THEREFORE,  the last

sentence of Section 1.20(b) is amended to read as follows:




 




 “The dollar amount for any year after 2001

shall be equal to $159,194 multiplied by ratio of the Code Section 401(a)(17)

limit for that year (as amended by EGTRRA) over the Code Section 401(a)(17)

limit for 1994.




 




This Amendment shall not apply to any participant whose employment with

the Employer terminated before January 1, 2002.




 




 




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc.

adopted this amended and restated Plan, effective January 1, 2002.




 




	

   


  	

   


  	

  SCHNITZER STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.


  
	

   


  	

   


  	

   


  
	

   


  	

  By:


  	

  /s/Leonard Schnitzer


  	

   


  
	

   


  	

  Leonard Schnitzer


  	

   


  
	

   


  	

  Chairman of the Board


  	

   


  
	

   


  	

  Chief Executive Officer


  	

   


  
	

   


  	

   


  	

   


  
	

   


  	

  Date:


  	

  November 21, 2001
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - December 2002 

Benefit payments December 2002 December 2001 

Total $726,332,000 $694,293,000 

Retired employees 460,045,000 438,491,000 

Regular Retirement Spouses and divorced spouses 87,915,000 85,262,000 

and Survivor Benefits Widow(er)s - aged and disabled 157,214,000 149,897,000 

Other survivors 21,158,000 20,644,000 

Number Average1 Number Average1 

Total 640,700 ......... 2,300 ......... ......... 

Regular employee annuities, total 297,100 $1,557 1,000 $2,202 ......... 

Age 215,100 1,521 2 400 2 2,560 3 $1,205 

Disability, age 65 and over 36,900 1,390 ......... ......... ......... 

Disability, under age 65 45,100 1,867 400 2,261 

Spouses and divorced spouses 150,300 587 600 739 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 164,300 957 600 1,333 

Widowed mothers and fathers 1,100 1,235 4/ 1,143 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 15,100 640 100 687 

Children 12,800 741 4/ 922 

Other survivors 100 622 ......... ......... ......... .........

5/ / 

585 622 

847 733 

640 657 

......... 

834 919 

439 345 

......... 

$895 

......... 

Being Paid Awarded 

Monthly benefits December 2002 

Average under 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded in 

month 

Social Security 

5

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement. 

Benefit payments 

December December 

2002 2001 Number Average 

$5,558,000 $5,553,000 131,700 $42 400 $41 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Number Average 

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 35); some 200 

other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis. 

4

Fewer than 50. 

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers. 

Note.--Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

December 2002 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Unemployment 6,100 $256.95 

Sickness 7,700 258.20 

Unemployment 

Sickness 4,633,000 5,695,000 

$9,686,000 

5,143,000 3,991,000 

Total $9,776,000 

Benefit payments 

December 2002 December 2001 

$450.84 

465.95 

Average payment 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period 

Per 

full week 

Note.--Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding 

Recycled 

Paper 

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary and the Office of Public Affairs
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 127 (Monday, July 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 32011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15714]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11800 and <greek-i>11801]


Kansas Disaster <greek-i>KS-00035

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Kansas (FEMA-1849-
DR), dated 06/25/2009.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Straight-line Winds, and 
Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 04/25/2009 through 05/16/2009.

DATES: Effective Date: 06/25/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 08/24/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/25/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 06/25/2009, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Anderson, Barber, Bourbon, Butler, Chase, Cherokee, 
Coffey, Cowley, Crawford, Elk, Finney, Greenwood, Harper, Harvey, 
Kingman, Labette, Linn, Lyon, Marion, Marshall, Montgomery, Morris, 
Neosho, Reno, Rice, Sumner, Wabaunsee, Wilson.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit             4.500
 Available Elsewhere:........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere:........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11800B 
and for economic injury is 11801B.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-15714 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Susser Holdings Corporation (the Company) for the three months ended March 30,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sam L. Susser, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                             |  |                                      
|----------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 9, 2008 |  | SUSSER HOLDINGS CORPORATION
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | By                          |  | /s/ Sam L. Susser                    
|                  |  |                             |  | Sam L. Susser                        
|                  |  |                             |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
****EXHIBIT 32.2****

 

****Certificationof Periodic Financial Report****

****Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350****

 

Forpurposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Dannette Henning, the ChiefFinancial Officer of Integrated Management Information, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

 

(i)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofthe Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Date:  May 13, 2010                   |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/  Dannette Henning                      |   |
| Dannette  Henning, Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-10194

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 4, 2012.

Anne Ruth Schultz, Wifredo A. Ferrer, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, Brandy Brentari Galler, U.S. Attorney’s Office, West Palm Beach, FL, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.

Richard L. Rosenbaum, Arnstein & Lehr, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Patrick Campbell, FCI Coleman Medium, Coleman, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before CARNES, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Richard L. Rosenbaum, appointed counsel for Patrick Campbell in this appeal, has moved to withdraw.from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Campbell’s supervised release and his corresponding 10-month sentence are AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Anthony A. Cook, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report of DCP Holding Company (the “Company’) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2007;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 12a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):          a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 10, 2007     Signature: /s/ Anthony A. Cook    Anthony A. Cook    Principal Executive Officer
ACCEPTED12-15-00125-CRTWELFTH COURT OF APPEALSTYLER, TEXAS7/23/2015 8:32:14 AMCATHY LUSKCLERK
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Thomas A. Tolworthy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of VS Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                   |  |                                     
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2007
|                   | 
|By:                |  | /s/ Thomas A. Tolworthy             
|                   |  | Thomas A. Tolworthy                 
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
ACCEPTED

01-15-00561-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/27/2015 8:19:10 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/27/2015 8:19:10 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6023 

SAMUEL C. DAVIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-03-3375)

Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 26, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel C. Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Samuel C. Davis appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. The district

court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended

that relief be denied and advised Davis that failure to timely file

objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of

a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this

warning, Davis failed to object to the magistrate judge’s

recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of

the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been

warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See

Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Davis has waived appellate

review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district

court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
@conference{10976,
  author = {Ping-Shine Shaw and Lindsay Hum and Zhigang Li and Keith Lykke and Michael Bishop},
  title = {Ultraviolet degradation study of photomultiplier tubes at SURF III},
  year = {2009},
  number = {7304},
  month = {2009-05-08},
  publisher = {Proceedings of SPIE, Defense, Security, and Sensing 2009, Orlando, FL},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=902573},
  language = {en},
}
48 Occupational Outlook Quarterly • Spring 2013

How long do workers stay with the same employer?

Median years of tenure with current employer for employed wage and salary workers, aged 16 years and over, 

by selected industry, January 2012 

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey

Every year, workers leave or change their employer. 

But how long do they stay before moving on? New data 

from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) show 

that wage and salary workers had been with their current 

employer for a median of 4.6 years in January 2012.

As the chart shows, employee tenure varied by 

industry. In government, for example, workers had 

been with the same employer for a median of 7.8 years, 

compared with 2.4 years for workers in the leisure and 

hospitality industry.

Employee tenure by industry depends on many factors, one of which is age. Younger workers have fewer 

years of tenure than older workers, who generally have 

been in the workforce longer. For example, data show 

that workers aged 25 to 34 had been with their current 

employer for about half as long as workers aged 45 to 50. 

Government workers as a group are usually older than 

leisure and hospitality workers, which helps, in part, to 

explain the difference in their median tenures.

Other factors that might affect tenure by industry are 

fluctuations in the numbers of new hires and separations.

These data come from a biennial supplement to the 

Current Population Survey (CPS). To learn more, see 

the BLS news release at www.bls.gov/news.release/

archives/tenure_09182012.htm or visit the CPS website 

at www.bls.gov/cps.

2.4

3.5

3.7

3.8

4.3

4.4

4.9

5.4

5.6

6.0

7.8

Leisure and hospitality

Mining, quarrying, and oil and 

gas extraction

Wholesale and retail trade

Professional and business services

Construction

Education and health services

Financial activities

Information

Transportation and utilities

Manufacturing

Government

2 4 6 8

Median years

Median, all wage and salary workers: 4.6 years