alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

NO. 03-15-00110-CR

IN THE

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

THOMAS KRAUSZ § APPELLANT

VS. §

THE STATE OF TEXAS § APPELLEE

APPEAL FROM THE 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

CAUSE NO. D1-DC-13-302230

STATE'S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

The State of Texas respectfully moves for an extension of the deadline for

filing the State’s brief and, in accordance with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

38.6 and 10.5(b), advises the Court as follows:

(a) Following his conviction for Possession Prohibited Weapon, the

appellant filed his notice of appeal in the above cause on February 9, 2015.

Appellant filed a brief on June 29, 2015.

(b) The State’s brief is currently due on July 29, 2015.

ACCEPTED

03-15-00110-CR

6229707

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

7/27/2015 10:55:07 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/27/2015 10:55:07 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
2

(c) This request is that the deadline for filing the State’s brief be extended

by 30 days.

(d) The number of previous extensions of time granted for submission of

the State’s brief is: none.

(e) The State relies upon the following facts to reasonably explain the

need for an extension of the deadline:

1. During the period since this brief was filed, the attorney assigned

to this case has been working on other pressing appellate matters

and has not had sufficient time to prepare an adequate response to

this brief.

2. This request is not made for the purpose of delay, but to ensure

that the Court has a proper State’s brief to aid in the just

disposition of the above cause.
3

WHEREFORE, the State of Texas respectfully requests that the deadline for

filing the State’s brief be extended to August 28, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

ROSEMARY LEHMBERG

District Attorney

Travis County, Texas

/s/ Lisa Stewart

Lisa Stewart

Assistant District Attorney

State Bar No. 06022700

P.O. Box 1748

Austin, Texas 78767

(512) 854-9400

Fax No. 854-4810

Lisa.Stewart@traviscountytx.gov

AppellateTCDA@traviscountytx.gov
4

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i), I hereby certify, based

upon the computer program used to generate this motion, that this motion contains

227 words, excluding words contained in those parts of the motion that Rule 9.4(i)

exempts from inclusion in the word count. I certify, further, that this motion is

printed in a conventional, 14-point typeface.

/s/ Lisa Stewart

Lisa Stewart

Assistant District Attorney

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on the 27th day of July, 2015, a true and correct copy of

this motion was served, by U.S. mail, electronic mail, facsimile, or electronically

through the electronic filing manager, to the Appellant’s attorney, Cherie A.

Ballard, Ballard & Mullowney, P.C., 900 RR 620 S, Suite C101-205, Austin,

Texas 78734, cherieballard@austin.rr.com.

/s/ Lisa Stewart

Lisa Stewart

Assistant District Attorney
# table30_q4.5_size
##### 



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-QSB/A
 þ
    
    Quarterly report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 For the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007.
 OR
 o
    
    Transition report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
 For the transition period from  to.
 COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 00051277
 WESTERN IOWA ENERGY, LLC
  Iowa
    
    41-2143913(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)incorporation or organization)
 1220 S. Center Street, P.O. Box 399
Wall Lake, Iowa 51466
 (712) 664-2173
  þ o
 o þ
  o þ




---



##### 



Table of Contents
 PART II
    
    
    2ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
    
    
    3SIGNATURES
    
    
    3
 EXPLANATORY NOTE
     2




---



##### 



Item 6. Exhibits.
 Exhibit No.
    
    Exhibit31.1
    
    Certificate Pursuant to 17 CFR 240.15d-14(a).31.2
    
    Certificate Pursuant to 17 CFR 240.15d-14(a).32.1
    
    Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350.32.2
    
    Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350.
 SIGNATURES
  WESTERN IOWA ENERGY, LLCJune 15, 2007
    
    /s/ William J. Horan

William J. HoranChairman, President and Director(Principal Executive Officer)June 15, 2007
    
    /s/ Denny Mauser

Denny MauserTreasurer and Director(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
  3
#### Charter One Bank, FSB, Successor by Merger to Albank, FSB, Respondent, v Richard F. Mills, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[976 NYS2d 913]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Genesee County (Robert C. Noonan, A.J.), rendered March 14, 2012. The order denied the motion of defendant Richard F. Mills for leave to reargue or renew his prior motions seeking permission to proceed as a poor person and for recusal, respectively.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in *Charter One Bank v Mills*(112 *1341AD3d 1338 [2013]). Present — Smith, J.E, Fahey, Garni, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SGS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), the undersigned each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |  |  |                                                  
|------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|May 11, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Henry R. Baughman                            
|             |  |  |  | Henry R. Baughman                                
|             |  |  |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director  
|             |  | 
|May 11, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ James M. Dahmus                              
|             |  |  |  | James M. Dahmus                                  
|             |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
@article{1206981,
  author = {Alexandra Metallinou Log and Vladimir Diky and Marcia L. Huber},
  title = {Assessment of a Parachor Model for the Surface Tension of Binary Mixtures},
  year = {2023},
  number = {44},
  month = {2023-06-07 04:06:00},
  publisher = {International Journal of Thermophysics},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936505},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-023-03216-z},
  language = {en},
}
# table88_q11.2_naics
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alamo Energy Corp. a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Allan Millmaker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Alamo Energy Corp., and will be retained by Alamo Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/ Allan MillmakerAllan Millmaker

Chief Executive Officer

March 22, 2010
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, the undersigned officer of Owens-Illinois, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certifies that to such officer’s knowledge:

 

(i)                                     the Annual Report on Form 10-K of theCompany for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)                                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  February 17, 2009 | /s/  Edward C. White                               |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                           | Edward C. White                                    |
|                           | Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                           | Owens-Illinois, Inc.                          |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### STATE EX REL. JAY BURK v. PAUL A. THUET, JR.1

March 10, 1950.

No. 35,187.

*A. M. Joyce,*for relator.

*Paul A. Thuet, Jr., pro se.*

1

 Reported in 41 N. W. (2d) 585.

Magnet, Justice.

Relator presented a verified petition to this court for a writ of quo warranto in the above-entitled matter. Upon said petition, this court issued an order to respondent to show cause why a writ of quo warranto should not be issued as prayed for in the petition.

Respondent had been appointed special judge of municipal court of the city of South St. Paul by the mayor of that city pursuant to M. S. A. 488.05. Relator brings this action to test the authority of respondent to act as such special judge.

Relator does not identify himself in this proceeding. There is nothing in his petition or attached instruments to indicate that he has any interest in this matter different from that of the general public. He submitted the application for a writ herein to the attorney general, who declined to institute the action or to consent to its institution on the ground that it was not in the public interest.

The general rule of law in this state is that a private citizen has no right, except under extraordinary or exceptional circumstances, to the use of quo warranto to test the title of an incumbent of a *366public office. State ex rel. Dowdall v. Dahl, 69 Minn. 108, 71 N. W. 910; State ex rel. Christianson v. Johnson, 201 Minn. 219, 275 N. W. 684; State ex rel. Wells v. Atwood, 202 Minn. 50, 277 N. W. 357; State ex rel. Dahl v. Fredrickson, 202 Minn. 79, 277 N. W. 407; State ex rel. Maffett v. Turnbull, 212 Minn. 382, 3 N. W. (2d) 674.

There are no extraordinary or exceptional circumstances disclosed here which would entitle relator, a private party, to test respondent’s title to the office of special judge of the municipal court of the city of South St. Paul.

Order to show cause discharged.
##### 



(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31,
2007 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Jerome B. EisenbergJerome B. EisenbergChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1048

GLENN A. FROEMAN, Petitioner,
versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; RODNEY E. SLATER, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary ofTransportation; JANE F. GARVEY, in her official capacity as acting Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Transportation. Submitted: February 27, 1998 Decided: April 3, 1998 Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Glenn A. Froeman, Petitioner Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, UnitedStates Attorney, Perry F. Sekus, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).23 PER CURIAM:Glenn Allen Froeman filed a "Petition to enjoin a U.S. regulation" requesting that this court enjoin Respondents from enforcing 49 C.F.R. § 392.5(a)(1), (2) (1997). Froeman asserts that § 392.5(a)(1), (2) violates the Constitution. We deny the petition. Because Froeman's petition requests that this court prevent federal officials from taking certain actions, this petition may beconstrued as a petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing he has "no other adequate means" to attain the relief hedesires, and that his right to such relief is "clear and indisputable." Allied Chem. Corp. v. Diaflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980) (citations omitted). The writ of prohibition is also an extraordinary remedy which should issue only when the petitioner's right to the remedy is clear and indisputable, see In re Vargas , 723 F.2d 1461, 1468 (10th Cir. 1983), and when the petitioner has no other adequate means of relief. See In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987).We deny Froeman's petition because he does not present extraordinary circumstances that require granting either writ. He fails to show that his right to relief is clear and indisputable or that he has exhausted all available means of relief. To the extent that4 Froeman seeks to appeal an administrative action, his action is time-barred and this court is without jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2344 (1994). We deny Froeman's "Application for Leave to Adduse [sic] Additional Evidence." We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
NO. 07-02-0019 -CR IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L A FEBRUA RY 13, 2002

______________________________ VICKIE DIANNE GRAY, APPE LLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT OF JEFFERSON CO UNTY; NO. 57941; HON ORABLECHARLE S D. CA RVER, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ. ON ABATEME NT AND REMAND Appellant Vickie Dianne Gray challenges her conviction for the offense of

securing execution of a docum ent by deception and th e r es ul ti ng sen te nc e o f two years confinem ent in the Institutional Division of the Departm ent of Crim inal Justice. Sentence w as imposed on Novem ber 13, 2001, and the record was theref ore due to be filed no later than January2

14, 2002. We have received the cler k’s record, but have n ot received the reporter ’s record. By letter dated January 15, 200 2, we notified t he court reporter s that the record had not been filed and , in theeve nt it cou ld no t beim m edia tely filed , th e re por

ter s s hou ld request an extens ion of time by f iling a r eporter’s request form within ten days. No response has been received tothat letter. Therefore, we abate this appeal and remand itto t he C rim inal District Court of Jefferson County for a hearing. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(a)(2). Upon remand, the judge of the trial court shall imm ediatel y cause notice to be given and conduct a hearing to determ ine whether appellant has abandoned her appeal or if she stil l desires to pursueher a ppeal. In the event appellant still desires to prosecute her app eal, the court shall determine w hy the reporter’s record ha s not been filed and whet her anyfurther

steps need to be taken to facilitate the provision of an appellate record and the co mpl et io n o f th e r ec or d f or ap pe ll at e r ev ie w. In support of

its determ inat ion, thetria l cou rt s hall prepare and file its findings and ordersand cause themto be included in a supplemental clerk’s record. Th e hearing proceedings shall be transcribed and included in a supplemental reporter’s record. Those supplemental records shall be submitted to the clerk of th is court no l ater than March 18, 2002. It is so ordered.3 Pe r C ur i am
#### In re CEDA MILLS, INC., Debtor Chet Duffy, Appellant. In re Ceda Mills, Inc., Appellant.

Nos. 10-3948, 10-4018.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) July 15, 2011.

July 18, 2011.

John P. Lacher, Esq., Elsie R. Lampl, Esq., Robert O. Lampl, Esq., Robert O. Lampl *&*Associates, Pittsburgh, PA, for Debtor and Appellant.

Michael Kaminski, Esq., Haig M. Sakoian, Esq., Blumling *&*Gusky, Pittsburgh, PA, for Appellant.

*496Present: RENDELL, SMITH and ROTH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT ORDER

MARJORIE O. RENDELL, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the District Court’s order dismissing as untimely an appeal taken from an order of the Bankruptcy Court dated April 13, 2010: (a) adopting the recommendation of the United States Trustee and overruling the Debtor’s response in opposition, and (b) directing the Debtor to remit surplus funds to minority shareholders. (App 9-10) (“Order”).

We find that the matters decided in the Order had not previously been decided by the Bankruptcy Court, and conclude, therefore, that the appeal from the Order was timely.

Accordingly, we vacate the District Court’s order dismissing the appeal from the Order, and remand for the District Court to consider the merits of the appeal.
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 21
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

        The following are the subsidiaries of Sterling Financial Corporation:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     Subsidiary                          State of Incorporation or Organization
     ----------                          --------------------------------------
<S>                                      <C>
Bank of Lancaster County, N.A.              (National Banking Association)
1 East Main Street
P.O. Box 0300
Strasburg, PA  17579


      Town & Country, Inc.                            Pennsylvania
      1097 Commercial Avenue
      East Petersburg, PA  17520


Sterling Mortgage Services, Inc.                      Pennsylvania
101 North Pointe Boulevard
Lancaster, PA  17601-4133


T & C Leasing, Inc.                                   Pennsylvania
1097 Commercial Avenue
East Petersburg, PA 17520


First National Bank of North East           (National Banking Association)
14 South Main Street
North East, MD 21901


Bank of Hanover & Trust Company                       Pennsylvania
25 Carlisle Court
Hanover,PA 17371


HOVB Investment Company                                 Delaware
103 Foulk Road, Suite 202
Wilmington, DE 19803
</TABLE>


                                       87
FILED IN

1ST COURT OF APPEALS

fi/ttm GMtUtit HOUSTON. TEXAS

JUL 2 7 2015

i » CHRISTOPHER m. PRINE

CLERK

UU&r{ <$/ 7P&- C/*/At#rtt!£rt£& d£*//fi-/ £?^- /ht<&S£

£2£?r&6£cnQ . M a*/ *?/* r&& (3jU£i/ajl&£S /a/ tt^t

T>/d<&jr- /U 7*^*3 /Ms /n*&£r rr £/&bg. Aw d?nt//M&Af<!?

T&tfr* 77$-CJ: /S ASaps; jWteT AzO <fa/0 Mtx w> drte&r tz> gear
<&rt £-i&~/6'f -^ &Qu&r*& />&sa/ a*j<3 stjacez&ijr ^ppAtg

U£<At4 77^~ ^kcf^Aa -ZV^3^2 J&tPt&enJr' *&p^J/ A*€lujbjr' "£eAsr\

/@£fjtMkST7A&i J£~ /?&UCM*f A«sA £r /&GA//0/IP&& , J$~ AzX&haJ

£Zfilifety>i3 Atuq £~{£&Af £*icflkl/oA££.,

jz: a*fjf J&a&m *££~&£&a/f>AfwifJ~ /*%a/ SZiiazfy&x a*uc

&ai &/f A^our \/k/</ J-Jt/T.-Z'eAAizr-vo *&**£ -rVfter &*/*/&&&*/

AuSojJ >^V A / 3- fj /tea M 3J*/ f/Uazz wdu#M Zfy

JT/U£)ui=irm /neAer*5m.AA//£S /& Ate/tcui •Sc&AA/tdj tt&ter

— AdM/J —

Au£ <J&~ /t&A-/ mfi&£ /£S£ia> -jz> AtAji&A&tzz' /*/After J<&/4rfldp&fc sr~ 77&US Ah £u£E*L 7/)*</.* ra t**r *£r~ *saH£ks ^

/k/Q&t F&#- J*&ft/ \_ JEfofJrusefiB&totAf/kp&L 75$, $&ca/*d&£*/

M &&&, oA ~2xciA/,asah£] A/o-fe: &/J?yn at/hf&C -sb/m Qgjgu /sf/ocj

A^UJ PM '?-£-'/S~ ^JTcoW$ 7>&*<&> db/z&*/ /&ta£&„ #/0 ^^

A^£nt&tfa> •

J.
ivw

fL PA

Y) (xwirfyu^

&

M-f)a cLre^/tf&ys

/ j /i /a \iCOLi5rr€swM!^m^ J r <zw,rc/- \J/~* Wf

w
33 friz:

33 d&i&r &* ApAen/s

faj' -jVm/ /h*£S */&=&££>

J^~ , ? ?• AT /£Sk&>

Fwl /k'/y>s4/T7nL7i/r 0^ dkt/tf&rf a^ao /Va-azx 77ha a?£*su*$t-

/A/ TtftJ> <J^AlU/StC&m\A <

J&--7A/&3 t/AAi/S rO &T Mrt Th£- /%cd AAs2AAl/ £k^

/Is Ak/f6/J&,, AiJyfdA/s wt &/tos& £?&?£&/«/ 77f^ //kiJ AdAi&t&et
70 &&$&&/< P&zsct/we /ner ?7^vr\ /ite-Mr 72? /ytyshe dUL d& A%?*tA

f^fU^ A dsU&r c^i^ra- Sti/erL TZ? /M&tl /r,>w<9 #£ A^urm&a r*

f&QUW Ca&* &r /?em?*j££ 0AJ /%&<£?- U*jH/

A/72XI £kn /*?*&&- m caJitH &yn/tutt/iCAm> sttfmroA

6wtr&A AWHxk 73 AfA&t&ur —Pfc*&s-.

M&u^r Ap/bairm&Ltr 6^ dutC&z/

SYlfa/y /yiA*j{ /Ha-/ujj&& lo/m ^Ms^ahAa//faA>^//?«s?s /<!&*a

&nJZ/uO {/<f-& /~3?f 7-?./S~-

($££} A-tf/MkO &*muutC4rra& AfiW4 /jk^{t4AAAy 7a/ $&Ot/s/c)

/
/iA.C\t: Ama #£. Jz&BtDA/uT' M/AiG^r /s /0*2&a/6 m^r ro

S&up £kir- CS) SAcOa/ 724L 1&£A/ /)?At/ SAf/>td£x/r SuAA^eS

Aler' IdAAAA^mD A j/fS $uJ Aa/ /EamMzAET A/at /V/Sitx®

_r 2W/- Mwe /huy&u& 5?S&a/ Afal/jLis,4/ ^ tctj^ar.

/fan/ -2^dA/J IiJtZjte Khz 6a/y~~-

T^mAJ. TTfc- /VBrniSZ. s /V&*£- a^x^atha- /Jtjzr-i m/Afcw

/$ srn&Mj/UC m ??&: /%te£ f&i Alj&ttr USAaTtvd Al&xTI <£&iA£.

LAST Wfht S/#AA> Abuti /fc£tof£3& 2),£S7y 7Zd£r Tt) &M^per /<4*T

AJUa/ /j&AAAliM T^AT/ldg- f&tirf) Lo&ht ^Jm&£7$, \fOU Ca*H

(Jct~: *=Zkmmz "TaIus^ /zauA) /fecai/ur a£a/a*xa *S/£iz&7s) (P/ufiA-0

/tf •/&£: A&WU)). Azues 'T-h.. d, Jl Ah MJAimA./ dSdt/r

rAf£/ti, ~£b///tfc, /S££C ^S/a&A' AaI &{j/*£faP&J /hrUC> Pt&J

17tiMtltdArt£k/~ /~ttrf _2~"// A" &//£/*£/£" ft>AL J?5~fAAfoL AAfA6c£&i*

fa&j S^&ue) rrfer Ale^r 3V6A/l£ fcffi$AT7d& #*/&: //r^Aumj^r

Pit djMTfST* 7^/tHt $u& <%?J 5&?j &/&upa*atJ

^~22x**&M- C%JUv3 a~de* /-&r 7-iV/