alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 957 

Expressing support for the designation of May as ‘‘National Asthma and 

Allergy Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2020 

Mr. ENGEL (for himself, Mr. UPTON, Mr. COX of California, and Mr. KING

of New York) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of May as ‘‘National 

Asthma and Allergy Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas 5,500,000 children in the United States, 7.5 percent, currently have asthma; 

Whereas 24,800,000, or one in 13 people in the United 

States, have asthma and the numbers are increasing each 

year; 

Whereas, in 2018, on average, children missed more than 

7,900,000 days of school and adults missed 10,900,000 

days of work because of asthma; 

Whereas asthma is the second most common noncommunicable disease among children; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 957 IH 

Whereas 1,700,000 individuals per year visit emergency departments because of asthma’s effects; 

Whereas the total economic cost of asthma in the United 

States was $81,900,000,000 per year from 2008 to 2013; 

Whereas fewer than half of people with asthma report being 

given an asthma action plan, which is key to the prevention of asthma attacks; 

Whereas asthma is a manageable disease; 

Whereas those with moderate to severe asthma may be at a 

greater risk of developing serious complications as a result of COVID–19 during the current public health emergency; and 

Whereas May would be an appropriate month to designate as 

‘‘National Asthma and Allergy Awareness Month’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National Asth3 ma and Allergy Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) encourages awareness of the prevalence of 

5 asthma and allergies, including heightened preva6 lence among women, minority, and urban demo7 graphics; 

8 (3) recognizes and salutes health care profes9 sionals who treat asthma and allergy-related health 

10 issues; 

11 (4) recognizes and salutes researchers working 

12 to identify asthma and allergy cures; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 957 IH 

1 (5) recognizes and reaffirms commitment to 

2 public education about asthma and allergy treatment 

3 and symptoms and to advancing care for both asth4 ma and allergy conditions; and 

5 (6) supports investment in researching the pre6 vention, treatment, and eradication of asthma. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 20, 2018

d0209 

# Order

Clerk February 20, 2018

155504

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 155504

COA: 335288

Wayne CC: 12

- 007551

- FC

DEMONE DOMINIQUE HALL,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2017

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Metals USA Holdings Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Periodic Report), I, Robert C. McPherson, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. To my knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                                                                           
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: November 12, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/    ROBERT C. MCPHERSON,
III                                           
|                         |  |  |  | Robert C. McPherson, III Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Angelique L. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Tracy L., Appellant, et al., Respondent. In the Matter of Kile L. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Tracy L., Appellant, et al., Respondent.

[822 NYS2d 454]

In two related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Sweeney, J.), entered November 2, 2005, which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, found that she had neglected the subject children and placed the children in the care and custody of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services for a period of one year. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal.

Ordered that the motion is granted, Stanley E. Gelzinis is relieved as the attorney for the appellant, and he is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,

Ordered that Kerry Sloane Bassett, Esq., 320 Carleton Avenue, Suite 4200, Central Islip, N.Y., 11722, 631-234-2511, is assigned as counsel to perfect the appeal; and it is further,

*800Ordered that the petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the transcript of the stenographic minutes to the new assigned counsel; and it is further,

Ordered that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the appellant on or before January 16, 2007 and the petitioner and the Law Guardian shall serve and file their briefs on or before February 15, 2007 and the appellant shall serve and file a reply brief, if any, on or before March 2, 2007; by prior decision and order on motion of this Court, the appellant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, with the appeal to be heard on the original papers (including the typewritten stenographic minutes) and on the typewritten briefs of the parties, who were directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other.

Upon this Court’s independent review of the record, we conclude that potentially nonfrivolous issues exist including whether the evidence was sufficient to support a finding of neglect, and whether continued placement of the children was in their best interests *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]). Accordingly, assigned counsel’s motion to be relieved is granted, and new counsel is assigned *(cf. Matter of Joseph B.,*307 AD2d 996 [2003]). Miller, J.E, Goldstein, Mastro and Dillon, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December
      31, 2004 (the “Report”) of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. (f/k/a Franklin
      Capital Corporation) **** (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I, Louis
        Glazer, M.D., Ph.G





(1)
      the
      accompanying Form 10-K/A report for the period ending December 31, 2004 as
      filed
      with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “ Report ”)
      fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.


Date: February
              13, 2006
            
            /s/ Louis Glazer, M.D., Ph.GLouis
                Glazer, M.D., Ph.GChief
                Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Patient Safety
      Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
Case 3:10-cv-06831-FLW -TJB   Document 8    Filed 02/11/11   Page 1 of 3 PageID: 39

Case 3:10-cv-06831-FLW -TJB   Document 8    Filed 02/11/11   Page 2 of 3 PageID: 40

Case 3:10-cv-06831-FLW -TJB   Document 8    Filed 02/11/11   Page 3 of 3 PageID: 41
THE BANK OF GEORGIA

                    1ST AMENDMENT TO STOCK WARRANT AGREEMENT


         THIS 1ST AMENDMENT TO STOCK WARRANT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is
entered into as of this ______ day of ____________, 2000, between The Bank of
Georgia, a Georgia state chartered bank (the "Bank"), and
_________________________ (the "Warrant Holder").

         WHEREAS, the Bank entered into that certain Stock Warrant Agreement
with Warrant Holder dated ________________ (the "Warrant Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, subject to certain conditions contained therein, the Warrant
Agreement granted to the Warrant Holder warrants to purchase up to _________
shares of the Bank's common stock for $10.00 per share (the "Warrants"); and

         WHEREAS, Section 9 (a) of the Warrant Agreement provided that the
Warrant Holder shall exercise all of the Warrant Holder's then exercisable
Warrants within 120 days of the date that the Warrant Holder ceases to serve the
Bank as an executive officer, employee, or director; and

         WHEREAS, the Bank and the Warrant Holder desire to amend the Warrant
Agreement as set forth below.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained
herein, the Bank and the Warrant Holder agree to modify and amend the Warrant
Agreement as follows:

1.       Section 9(a) of the Warrant Agreement is deleted in its entirety and
         replaced with the following:

         9.  Mandatory Exercise; Termination.

         (a) Except as otherwise provided in subparagraph (b), Warrant Holder
             shall have the right to exercise all of Warrant Holder's then
             exercisable Warrants for up to 120 days after the date that the
             Warrant Holder ceases to serve the Company as an executive officer,
             employee, or director. Warrant Holder shall have the right to
             exercise any Warrants that are not exercisable on the date in which
             Warrant Holder ceases to serve the Company for up to 120 days after
             the date that those Warrants become exercisable. In the event the
             Warrant Holder fails to exercise any of the Warrants referred to in
             this subparagraph within such 120 day periods, such Warrants shall
             be forfeited.

2.       All other terms of the Warrant Agreement shall remain in full force and
         effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Bank and Warrant Holder have caused this
Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first above written.



                                      THE BANK OF GEORGIA

                                      By: __________________________________
                                            Name:
                                            Title:

                                      WARRANT HOLDER

                                       By:  ________________________________
                                               Name:

                                      Address:______________________________
<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 21.0

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

o    Meret Communications, Inc., a California corporation

     o    Sorrento Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation

          o    Sorrento Networks Europe SA, a Belgium company

          o    Sorrento Networks GmBH, incorporated in Germany

          o    Osicom Technologies Europe Limited, incorporated in the United
               Kingdom

          o    Osicom Technologies SA, incorporated in France

          o    Sorrento Networks Asia-Pacific PTE LTD

o    Sorrento Valley Real Estate Holdings, LLC, a California limited liability
     corporation

o    Relialogic Technology Corporation, a California corporation

o    R-Net International, Inc., a Nevada corporation

o    PDP Acquisition Corp., a California corporation, (doing business as Pacific
     Data Products)

o    Sciteq Communications, Inc., a Nevada corporation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from December 31,
1996 Financial Statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          49,914
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,430
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,036
<PP&E>                                          19,236
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 721,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          102,347
<BONDS>                                        118,334
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     328,264
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   721,658
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               392,651
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  310,842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,728
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 73,081
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,857
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             70,224
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    70,224
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.88
        

</TABLE>
Opinion issued July 23, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00530-CV

———————————

IN RE SUNSET NURSING HOME, INC., Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Sunset Nursing Home, Inc., has filed a petition for a writ of 

mandamus, contending that respondent, the Honorable Patrick Sebesta, abused his

discretion in striking Sunset’s amended pleadings and withholding discoverable 

documents and information from Sunset.

1

 

1

The underlying case is Sunset Nursing Home, Inc. v. Rebecca Ann, Inc., Donald 

Grether, Paul A. Heinig, and Plantation Health Care, Inc., cause number 72817, 
2

We deny the petition.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Brown.

 

in the 239th District Court of Brazoria County, the Honorable Patrick Sebesta, 

presiding.
v. Crim. No. 10-834

JAQUAN BOWENS ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE

This matter having come before the Court on the joint

application of Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the

District of New Jersey (Adam N. Subervi, Assistant U.S. Attorney,

appearing), and defendant Jaquan Bowens (John Yauch, Esq.,

appearing), for an order granting a continuance of the

proceedings in the above-captioned matter for a period of 60 days

to continue discovery and plea negotiations, and the defendant

being aware that he has the right to have the matter brought to

trial within 70 days of the date of his appearance before a

judicial officer of this court pursuant to Title 18 of the United

States Code, Section 3161(c) (1), and as the defendant has

consented to such a continuance, and for good and sufficient

cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should

be continued for the following reasons:

(1) Plea negotiations are currently in progress, and

both the United States and the defendant desire additional time

to negotiate a plea agreement, which would render any trial of

this matter unnecessary;
T IS, therefore, on this R day ci September, 2011,

ORDERED that this ectioi: be, tue hereb is, continued

for a pence of 60 days, until November 7, 2011; and it is

ORDERED that the neiiod from September 8, 2011 through

November 7, 2011 shall he excludable in computino time under the

Speedy Trial Act of 974.

Hon. Dickinson P. Dehevoise

United States District Judge

Form and entry

consented tor

1-l-i -

i.dam H. uberv’

Assistant U.S. Attorney

nt Jaquan Bowens
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DANIEL SHEPPARD
, Appellant,

v.

GUARDIANSHIP OF JONATHAN E. SHEPPARD
, Appellee

.

No s . 4D 21

- 2584 and 4D21

- 2596

[ September 15, 2022 ]

Consolidated a ppeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Jeffrey R. Levenson , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. MHC21

- 00116 3 and PRC21

- 001623

.

Abbey L. Kaplan and Josh M. Rubens of Kluger, Kaplan, Silverman, Katzen & Levine, P.L., Miami, for appellant.

Philip M. Burlington and Nichole J. Segal of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Andrew T. Lavin of Lavin Law Group, P.A., Miami, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., G ROSS and D AMOORGIAN
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00446-CR

Michael Raynard Speace Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1350042D)

July 23, 2015

Opinion by Justice Gardner

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Anne Gardner__________

 Justice Anne Gardner
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Crim. No. 11-24 (FSH)

v. : O R D E R

HASSON THOMAS :

Defendant. :

This matter having come before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge filed in this matter, which was submitted as a result of this Court having

referred this cause to the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of conducting a plea proceeding under

Fed. R. Crim. P. 11; and the defendant having consented to the Magistrate Judge conducting the

guilty plea proceeding; and the Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as

the transcript of the proceedings on July 5, 2011 and there being no objection to the Report and

Recommendation timely filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b); and the Court finding the Report and

Recommendation is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law; and the Court hereby finding that

the Report and Recommendation should be approved and adopted and the defendant’s guilty plea

accepted,

IT IS ON THIS 27 day of July, 2011, th

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is

approved and adopted; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant’s guilty plea is accepted and a judgment

of guilt to Count One of the Indictment shall be entered. 

 s/ Faith S. Hochberg 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:11-cr-00024-GEB Document 18 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 50
CwftC DPe&MHRL APPEALS AUSTIN, Temp

.?%<•*< i.*!1.* /^g" ^wmnniBi

sa.1'. rw \.t< Hjmi'uii'enu APPEALS

TOHNNV P4(JL St/THEtfLlN, prose JUL 27 2Q15

THfSlnTE OP T£,An5 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPE/UC

From Appeal Mo, I3r &~0O31 4-11? JUL 27 2315

Abel Acosta, Clerk

fjqsVfWtWH FOR ^TENSION OFTrrmf: *Tt> F^L£

Petition foK jafcRETioH^V i?£^ E^

Corner nflit;.Jokn/y feu(Siberia pro .se, f?&fehef^<?Ael-A% *k<3

I.

^Wercx &W# "fe^ of&e crfftiKses ^P Poor w^^s or a^tiveM s^veis5Sa^d^fcjoo'^o^'R^ri'\^d Ktin&ppuw \'kCso6c Ho,3122& -s

tfyle^S$Me-d>1&&> v^M^^fSu\Urtin .The,footer app^l^ •io Ae. CjotsttoFAapeMSfthtte. "WJ-frk Ccvf*of Appetk Ty/p^{ fe*S6.

TI\e use uo&5 -mintedok ^b^%¥\.aoi&o

0)
JX

SvfyteHk (ioifi /Tim. (&£&*& te n.efr&zv&s-teA &\y exfe^io* prior 4o

fJu5 newish,

OH,

•fet*4iPKe*3 Agy/e^f-for mextewcK ft b&^J opoA -& e Mnuot** fefc»

Jk .Sos ejM*p# ^ <#^ af ^?//\ f%5 4-c rau'cye. kwlmmtXv\f*oA^ae>ts(

B£_5ee^ki<M£^a.fetter ^w^rt^fe!Mj> afW/tfyJ UWM71 Moose CTK* 4K^f

^f^^^t.ri^^^iW^^Wtl$dyM*k}wi£ ojitkx)i{jy(t4)'foofSkys lety \o (ejilly f/fe a. f?J^J^, *#i<s s^oyc mAio^eclMotley$k®dte bziQ i^de.-

pw<x&6 is4^£tlMd&^ihmTM SksvlkyouckShe of4^- opttue\Jh#jte. i^Coutk of RMezh^^^rXK^ p^<Oi\

4ive <&*• a*(& dcGK\pie\&- ihcoMpe.h*££- ^ M& otJy 4 JkyS h tortfe

aPM*

ft(c+ic\ foi^w'c^etTttotJofife- Qebhb\ foD&t^'o^yitvteu) ,f&N{

bA^ Ar 2k>0 day ©cfei5»H'

UJhcrdfbre., fMib^e^fyrteoi pfosc/ pw/5 #v<5 Coaler jy^--fko