alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD - 1

Program

Letter

 United States

 Railroad Retirement Board

 Office of Programs

 

Quality Reporting Service Center

Email: QRSC@RRB.GOV 

Phone: (312) 751-4992

 Fax: (312) 751-7123

Letter No. 2023-04 Date: 04/13/2023

 

TO: Certification, Registration, Retirement and Unemployment Contact Officials

SUBJECT: Reinstatement of Sequestration for Unemployment and Sickness Benefits

 Effective May 10, 2023

Please distribute this notice to all individuals within your organization who may need the

information in connection with their work.

On Monday, April 10, 2023, the President signed into law House Joint Resolution 7, which 

terminated the national emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, effective 

May 10, 2023, sequestration will resume for unemployment and sickness benefits payable to 

employees under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA). 

As part of the Continued Assistance to Rail Workers Act of 2020 (CARWA), unemployment and 

sickness benefits payable under the RUIA were exempt from sequestration for days claimed 

beginning January 3, 2021. Now that the Presidential declaration of the national emergency 

related to COVID-19 has terminated the sequestration exemption is to end 30 days after. 

The reinstatement of the sequestration resumes for days beginning May 10, 2023, and benefits 

are to be reduced by 5.7 percent. Only the reduced amount of sickness or unemployment benefits 

paid to a claimant will be charged to the claimant's base year employer's benefit account balance 

and consequently will be used when calculating the base year employer's experience rated RUIA 

contribution rate for any future years. The amount sequestered will not be charged to the 

claimant's base year employer's benefit account balance.

If you have any questions regarding the information in this program letter, please contact the 

Railroad Retirement Board’s Quality Reporting Service Center at (312) 751-4992

###
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Stem Cell Therapy International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Daniel Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:   February 12, 2007        /s/Daniel Sullivan
                                  ---------------------------
                                  Chief Financial Officer and Chief
                                  Accounting Officer
Via Electronic Filing 

Clerk 

Debra K. Autrey 

Court of Appeals 

Sixth Appellate District 

Bi-State Justice Building 

KILGORE MCCOWN, PLLC 

ATTORNEYS & COUNSELORS AT LAW 

July 21, 2015 

100 North State Line Avenue #20 

Texarkana, TX 75501 

Re: Appellate Case Number: 06-15-00021-CV 

Trial Court Case Number: CV-14-41722 

Sidney B. Hale, Jr., v. City of Bonham 

Dear Clerk: 

Dottie Sheffield 

dsheffield@kmlawpllc.com 

As of July 1, 2015, the law firm of Helms & Kilgore, PLLC, merged into the new law firm 

of Kilgore I McCown, PLLC. Please note the new information below: 

Kilgore McCown, PLLC 

2201 Main Street, Suite 212 

Dallas, TX 75201 

214-296-4850-telephone 

972-532-6496 - facsimile 

Dottie Sheffield 

dsheffield@kmlawpllc.com 

Chris Kilgore 

ckilgore@kmlawpllc.com 

Dallas • 2201 Main Street, Suite 212, Dallas, TX 75201 • Southlake • 141 Countryside Court, Suite 100 

Southlake, TX 76021 KMLawPLLC.com 

ACCEPTED

06-15-00021-CV

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

7/21/2015 2:42:21 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 7/21/2015 2:42:21 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
July 21, 2015 

Page2 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

DS/sc 

CC: 

Via Facsimile: 281-367-8003 

George A. Coats 

Gary L. Evans 

Coats & Evans, PC 

Post Office Box 130246 

The Woodlands, TX 77393-0246 

Sincerely, 

Dottie Sheffield 

Partner
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15400]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Ultra-Deepwater Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Ultra-Deepwater 
Advisory Committee. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this meeting be announced 
in the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, July 15, 2009, 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. (EST).

ADDRESSES: TMS, Inc., 955 L'Enfant Plaza North, SW., Suite 1500, 
Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elena Melchert, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Oil and Natural Gas, Washington, DC 20585. Phone: 
202-586-5600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of the Committee: The purpose of the Ultra-Deepwater 
Advisory Committee is to provide advice on development and 
implementation of programs related to ultra-deepwater architecture and 
technology to the Secretary of Energy and provide comments and 
recommendations and priorities for the Department of Energy Annual Plan 
per requirements of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Title IX, subtitle 
J, section 999D.
    Tentative Agenda:

7:30 a.m.--Registration.
8 a.m.-11:45 a.m.--Welcome and Introduction, Opening Remarks, 
Presentation on Status of DOE Oil and Natural Gas Program, section 999 
Planning Process, Status of Ultra-Deepwater Program, Overview of 
Response to section 999D Advisory Committee Recommendations, and 
Facilitated Discussions.
11:45 a.m.-12 p.m. Public Comments.
12 p.m.--Adjourn.

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. The 
Designated Federal Officer and the Chairman of the Committee will lead 
the meeting for the orderly conduct of business. If you would like to 
file a written statement with the Committee, you may do so either 
before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral statements 
regarding any of the items on the agenda, you should contact Elena 
Melchert at the address or telephone number listed above. You must make 
your request for an oral statement at least five business days prior to 
the meeting, and reasonable provisions will be made to include the 
presentation on the agenda. Public comment will follow the 5 minute 
rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 60 days at the Freedom of Information Public 
Reading Room, Room 1G-033, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on June 25, 2009.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-15400 Filed 6-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB in accordance with Rule 15(d)-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of One Earth Energy, LLC;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of One Earth Energy, LLC, as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;
 4.
    
    One Earth Energy, LLCs other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for One Earth Energy, LLC, and have:
 d)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to One Earth Energy, LLC, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;e)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of One Earth Energy, LLCs disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andf)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in One Earth Energy, LLCs internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during One Earth Energy, LLCs most
recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, One Earth Energy, LLCs internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    One Earth Energy, LLCs other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to One Earth Energy, LLCs
auditors and the audit committee of One Earth Energy, LLCs board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect One Earth Energy, LLCs ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in One Earth Energy, LLCs internal controls over financial
reporting.
 Date: March 16, 2007
    
    /s/ Jack MurrayJack Murray(Principal Financial Officer)
#### DAYTON VENEER & LUMBER MILLS v. CINCINNATI, N. O. & T. P. RY. CO.

No. 170.

District Court, E. D. Tennessee, S. D.

Oct. 18, 1940.

*445Sizer, Chambliss & Kefauver, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for plaintiff.

Lynch, Whitaker, Hall & Allison, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for defendant.

DARR, District Judge.

The motion has two grounds:

(1) That the complaint be dismissed because not brought in the name of the real party in interest as required by Rule 17 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

(2) That the plaintiff disclose the name of certain fire insurance companies which may have paid the plaintiff any sums of money as a result of the fire referred to in the complaint, giving amounts, etc.

There was a showing made under the motion that the plaintiff had been paid a substantial sum by certain fire insurance companies by reason of the fire.

The dispute in this case is whether or not the defendant was guilty of negligence which caused the manufacturing plant of the plaintiff to be burned.

It is my judgment that' the reasoning and conclusions of Judge Dickinson, of the District Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, are correct in his announcements made in the case of Lloyd Moore, Inc., et al. *v.*Schwartz, reported in 26 F. Supp. 188.

Judge Dickinson said that the jurisdiction of federal courts in diversity of citizenship cases is based upon the “controversy” and that the controversy was between the legal plaintiff and the defendant.

In this case the controversy is between the Dayton Veneer & Lumber Mills, as legal plaintiff, against the defendant.

For the reasons stated, more fully elaborated in the opinion above referred to, it is my judgment that the motion should be overruled.

An order will be drawn in accord with this ruling.

Note. The Tennessee laws, including' decisions, are substantially the same as the Pennsylvania laws referred to in Judge Dickinson’s opinion.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the report of Asia Time Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities
      and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Kwong Kai ShunKwong
                Kai ShunChief
                Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)August
                18, 2008





/s/
                King Wai LinKing
                Wai LinChief
                Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)August
                18, 2008




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Asia Time Corporation and will be retained by Asia Time Corporation
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT

ANTHONY C . PAR R ISH a nd PETER J. HEB ER T, Pla i ntiffs-Appe lla nts,
v. R AY M AB US, in his offic ia l c a pa c ity a s the Se c re ta

ry of the Na vy , De fe nda n t-Appe l le e . No. 14-15228 D.C . No. 1:12-c v-00621-B M K
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Sta t e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ha

wa ii B a rry M . Kurre n, M a g i stra te Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 24, 2017 * * Honolulu, Ha

wa ii B e fore : KOZINSKI, HAW K INS, a nd B EA, C irc uit Judge s. 

# FIL ED
MAR 09 2017 M O LLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not ap p r o pr iate for public a tion a nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * T h e p an el u n an i m ously c onc l ud es t h i s cas e i s s ui tab l e f o r d eci s i o n without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).Appe lla nts Anthony Pa rrish a nd Pe te r He be rt (c o lle c tive ly , “ Pla intiffs” ) a ppe a l the a dve rse gra nt of sum m a ry judgm e nt on the ir Title VII r ace disc rim ina tion a n d
re ta lia tion c la im s. W e a ffirm
. Sum m a ry judgm e nt wa s prope rly gra nte d on a ll c la im s involving a dve rse
e m ploy m e nt a c tions due to t

he re voc a tion of Pla i ntiffs' se c urity c l e a ra n c e s b e c a use we la c k the a

b ility to re vie w the m e rits of a de c ision to gra nt or re voke a se c urity
c le a ra nc e . De

p’t o f the N av y v . Egan , 484 U .S. 518, 527–29 (1988). In conduc ting
a Title VII a na l y s is, it is “ im possible for the c ourt to e sta blish in t he first pla c e whe the r the [De fe nda

nt’ s] proffe re d re a sons w e re le gitim a t e without e va lua ting the ir
m e rits.” Brazil v . U

. S

. De p’t of the N

av y , 66 F.3d 193, 197 (9th C i r. 1995). Eve n if the fa ilure to follow norm a l a ge nc y proc e dure s w e re c ir cu m st an tia l e vide nc e of disc rim ina tory

inte nt, in orde r to e va lua te the Title V II c la i m s we would s till ne e d to
we igh the m e rits o f t h e proffe re d nondisc rim ina tory re a sons for re voking the
c le a ra nc e s, whic h we c a

nnot do unde r Brazil
. Id. Pla intiffs fa ile d to inc l ude a ny a rgum e nt in the ir ope ni n g brie f re ga rding the Title VII a nd re ta lia

tion c la im s tha t did n ot involve se c urity c le a ra nc e s, a nd ha ve thus

w a ive d a ny a rgum e nt tha t the distric t c ourt e rre d in gra nting sum m a ry judgm e nt o n the s e c la im s. M

c K a y v . I n g les o n , 5 5 8 F.3d 888, 891 n.5 (9th C ir. 2009). A ba re
a sse rtion in a brie f w ith no supporting a rgum e nt, or a n ar gu m en t m a de only in
2pa ssing, is insuffic ie nt t o a void wa ive r. Se e C hristian Le

gal Soc

. C

hapte r of the Univ

. of C al. v

. W u , 626 F.3d 483, 488 (9th C ir. 2010). AFFIRM E D.

3
@article{1211206,
  author = {Garnett W. Bryant and Piotr Rozanski and Michal Zielinski},
  title = {Scanning tunneling microscopy of buried dopants in silicon: images and their uncertainties},
  year = {2022},
  number = {8},
  month = {2022-08-23 04:08:00},
  publisher = {npj Computational Materials},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=933430},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00857-w},
  language = {en},
}
(More)

No. 20-4 For Immediate Release

March 2020

Railroad Retirement Board Closes Field Offices to Public 

On March 13, the President declared the COVID-19 virus outbreak a national 

emergency. While U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) employees continue to work 

both on-site and remotely, out of an abundance of caution, the RRB decided to close its 53 

field offices to the public effective Monday, March 16, until further notice. 

Older individuals with underlying medical conditions comprise a significant 

percentage of individuals who visit their local field office for assistance. Unfortunately, 

this same group of people are also within the group of people at high-risk of contracting 

the virus. The decision to close public access to field offices was made in order to mitigate 

the exposure to the COVID-19 virus. Limiting personal contact is the best method for 

combating widespread transmission of the virus for both our customers and our employees. 

While closed physically, these offices will continue to remain accessible by phone and 

email. 

This regrettable situation allows for the opportunity to become better acquainted 

with self-service options which are available for RRB customers. These options are 

available 24/7. Customers can request the following documents and get the following 

information online by visiting myRRB at RRB.gov or by using the automated menus on 

the toll-free number (877-772-5772): 

 Letters verifying income and monthly benefits rates

 Service and compensation statement

 Replacement Medicare card

 Duplicate tax statement (1099, 1099R)

 General benefit information

 RRB field office addresses

U.S. Railroad Retirement Board

RRB News

844 North Rush Street Chicago, Illinois 60611-1275

www.rrb.gov

877-772-5772 general information

Public Affairs

312-751-4777 

opa@rrb.gov media inquiries
-2-

In addition, railroad employees who have established myRRB accounts can login 

and:

 Apply for and claim unemployment benefits

 Claim sickness benefits

 Check the status of their unemployment or sickness benefit claims

 View their railroad service and compensation history

 Get an estimate of retirement benefits

If a customer absolutely needs to talk to an RRB employee, they always have the 

option of connecting with a representative through the toll-free number (877-772-5772). 

However, customers are being asked to be patient because of the expected increase in call 

volume due to the office closures.

Customers also have the option of sending a secure e-mail to their local office by 

accessing Field Office Locator on RRB.gov, and clicking on the link at the bottom of 

their servicing office’s page.

# # #
J. 

but nothing beyond that. Kay, 122 Nev. at 1105; 146 P.3d at 805. We 

have considered all other arguments made by appellant and conclude that 

they do not warrant reversal. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

Gibbons 

cc: Hon. Richard Wagner, District Judge 

Richard David Morrow 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Pershing County Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 2 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A
#### In re EVANISHYN.

District Court, S. D. New York.

April 8, 1939.

Samuel Robbins, of New York City, for petitioning-creditor.

David -M. Schwartz, of New York City, guardian ad litem.

Samuel Newfield, of New York City, trustee.

HULBERT, District Judge.

At the time of the filing of the involuntary petition in bankruptcy in this proceeding, the address of the alleged bankrupt was stated, therein to be Women’s State Prison, Bedford Hills, New York, which is within this Judicial District.

It appears from an affidavit submitted by the attorney for the petitioning creditor that the alleged bankrupt was on March 25, 1939, transferred from the Women’s State Prison and committed to Matteawan State Hospital, Beacon, New York, also within this Judicial District.

Chapter 4, Section 18 of the Bankruptcy Act, Title 11 U.S.C.A. Chap. 4, Section 41, provides: “Upon the filing of a petition for involuntary bankruptcy, service thereof, with a writ of subpoena, shall be made upon the person therein named as defendant in the same manner that service of such process was had on July 1, 1898, upon the commencement of a suit in equity in the courts of the United States * * *.”

Equity Rule 15, following section 723, Title 28 U.S.C.A., provides: “The service of all process, mesne and final, shall be by the marshal of the district, or his deputy, or by some other person specially appointed by the court for that purpose, and not otherwise. In the latter case, the person serving the process shall make affidavit thereof.”

This Rule is practically the same as old Rule 15 and its predecessor 14.

General Order in Bankruptcy, No. 37, adopted January 16, 1939, effective February 13, 1939, 11 U.S.C.A. following section 53, provides: “In proceedings under the Act the Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts of the United States [28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c] shall, in so far as they are not inconsistent with the Act or with these general orders, be followed as nearly as may be.”

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 4(c), provides: “Service of all process shall be made by a United States marshal, by his deputy, or by some person specially appointed by the court for that purpose, except that a subpoena may be served as provided in Rule 45. Special appointments to serve process shall be made freely when substantial savings in travel fees will result.”

*203
      *Rule*45(c) provides: “A subpcena *may*be served by the marshal, by his deputy, or by any other person who is not a party and is not less than 18 years of age.”

It appears that if the United States Marshal is required to service the process herein his charge will be $15 and the assets are meager. The attorney for the petitioner creditor requests an order that he be authorized to make the required service. In my opinion an attorney stands in the same relationship as a party. The Court will designate any suitable person over the age of 18 years. It ought to be possible to secure some person residing at Beacon, New York, and avoid the railroad fare from New York to that point and return.