alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1030 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1030

   To allow individuals to choose to opt out of the Medicare part A 
                                benefit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 4, 2019

Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Paul, and Mr. Lee) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To allow individuals to choose to opt out of the Medicare part A 
                                benefit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Retirement Freedom Act''.

SEC. 2. ALLOWING INDIVIDUALS TO CHOOSE TO OPT OUT OF THE MEDICARE PART 
              A BENEFIT.

    Any individual who is otherwise entitled to benefits under part A 
of title XVIII of the Social Security Act may elect (in such form and 
manner as may be specified by the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services) to opt out of such entitlement. Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, in the case of an individual who makes such an 
election, such individual--
            (1) may (in such form and manner as may be specified by the 
        Secretary) subsequently choose to end such election and opt 
        back into such entitlement (in accordance with a process 
        determined by the Secretary) without being subject to any 
        penalty;
            (2) shall not be required to opt out of benefits under 
        title II of such Act as a condition for making such election; 
        and
            (3) shall not be required to repay any amount paid under 
        such part A for items and services furnished prior to making 
        such election.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-13-00405-CV

JOHN BURNS, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF 

WAXAHACHIE HERITAGE PARTNERS, LLC,

Appellants

v.

SWS GROUP, INC. D/B/A SOUTHWEST 

SECURITIES, FSB, RUSSELL PHILLIPS, 

BRAD OWENS, RHETT MILLER III, 

PETER BROWN, DUSTIN AUTREY, 

JAMES HOWARD, AND DOES 1-10,

Appellees

From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 87704

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, John Burns, individually and derivatively on behalf of Waxahachie 

Heritage Partners, LLC, have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal, stating 

that they have “resolved their differences” with appellees, SWS Group, Inc. d/b/a 
Burns v. SWS Group, Inc. Page 2

Southwest Securities, FSB, Russell Phillips, Brad Owens, Rhett Miller III, and Peter 

Brown. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Dismissal of this appeal would not prevent the 

parties from seeking relief to which they would otherwise be entitled. The motion is 

granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the 

time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP.

P., Order Regarding Fees (amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007); see id. at R. 5; see 

also 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207(b), 51.208, 

51.941(a) (West 2013). Under these circumstances, we suspend the rule and order the 

Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. TEX. R. APP. P. 2. The write-off of 

the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates or reduces the 

fees owed.

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted; appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed February 13, 2014

[CV06]
NO. 03-14-00516-CR

MARK ANTHONY SERRANO IN THE

V. THIRD COURT OF APPEALS 

THE STATE OF TEXAS AUSTIN, TEXAS 

 STATE'S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS: 

 NOW COMES the State of Texas, Appellee in the above entitled and 

numbered cause and files this Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Appellee's Brief, and in support thereof would show the Court the following:

 I.

Appellant was found guilty of Theft Over $20,000, a Third Degree 

felony enhanced as a Habitual Offender, and the Jury assessed punishment 

at 25 years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice on 

June 19, 2014. Appellant filed Notice of Appeal on August 20, 2014. 

Appellant's brief was filed on April 22, 2015. Appellant’s amended brief was 

filed on May 12, 2015. The State's brief is currently due on July 24, 2015.

 II.

 The State has requested one previous extension in this case. 

 III.

 The State requests this extension of time due to the following: Counsel 

for the State has been preparing for jury trial on a Aggravated Assault with a 

Deadly Weapon, enhanced as a Habitual Offender, in State v. James Ray 

Parker, Cause Number B-13-0458-SA, which began on July 20, 2015. 

Additionally, Counsel for the State has been involved in prosecution of cases 

including contested hearings, pretrial hearings, grand jury presentation, 

ACCEPTED

03-14-00516-CR

6234320

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

7/27/2015 1:31:43 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/27/2015 1:31:43 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
negotiations with opposing counsel, guilty pleas and other hearings in 

numerous additional pending felony cases. 

 WHEREFORE, The Attorney for the State requests an extension of 

time to August 24, 2015, in which to file State's Brief.

Respectfully submitted,

_______________________

John Best

Assistant District Attorney

51st Judicial District

124 W. Beauregard, Suite B

San Angelo, TX 76903

(325) 659-6583

State Bar No. 00796203

SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me by the said John Best, 

this 27th day of July, A. D. 2015.

_______________________

Notary Public

State of Texas

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion for 

Extension of Time to File Appellee's Brief was this 27th day of July, 2015, 

delivered to Randol Stout, at rls2700@gmail.com, Attorney for Appellant, 

through e-file.txcourts.gov. .

_______________________

 John Best
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Affinion Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Nathaniel J. Lipman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: July 30, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Nathaniel J. Lipman
|Nathaniel J. Lipman    
|Chief Executive Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

AMY SMETANICK

- BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

CYNTHIA BROWN,

Appellee.

No. 4D 2 02 2

- 3300

[ December 7, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seven teenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County; Thomas J. Coleman

, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE20

-

010266

.

Terrence P. O’Connor of Morgan, Carratt & O’Connor, P.A., Fort

Lauderdale, for appellant.

Craig J. Trocino, Coral Gables, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirme d.

M AY

, L EVINE and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Order entered July 17, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00801-CV

JAY SANDON COOPER, Appellant

V.

JUDGE PAUL MCNULTY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-01611-2015

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s July 16, 2015 “motion to proceed.” In the motion, 

appellant notes the trial court sustained the Collin County District Clerk’s contest to his affidavit 

of indigence, asserts he cannot afford the costs of this appeal, and requests permission to proceed 

without advance payment of costs. We construe the motion as a motion to review the trial 

court’s order sustaining the contest as provided in Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1(j)(1) 

and ORDER Indu Bailey, Official Court Reporter of the 219th Judicial District Court, to 

file the record of the July 7, 2015 indigency hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(j)(1),(3). We 

further ORDER Collin County District Clerk Andrea Stroh Thompson to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of the affidavit of indigence, the contest to the 

affidavit, and the trial court’s order sustaining the contest. The requested records shall be filed 
no later than July 20, 2015 and without advance payment of costs. See id. 4.1, 20.1(j)(3). No 

extensions will be granted. See id. 20.1(j)(4).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Scott J. Becker, Presiding Judge, 219th Judicial District Court; Ms. Bailey; Ms. Stroh 

Thompson; and all parties.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                     [KORN/FERRY INTERNATIONAL LETTERHEAD]


June 6, 2001


Mr. Paul C. Reilly
8301 Tallahassee Dr. N.E.
St. Petersburg, FL 33702


Dear Paul:

As a supplement to the terms and conditions contained in your Employment
Agreement with Korn/Ferry International, this letter adds the following benefits
to your employment package:

1.   Korn/Ferry International (the "Company") will cover any difference between
     the amount you originally paid for your current primary residence plus
     verified capital improvements made since purchase (i.e., your current tax
     basis) and the gross selling price received upon sale of this residence
     provided such sale is in connection with your relocation to the area of the
     Company's corporate headquarters. Any reimbursement provided by the Company
     will be adjusted to reflect the effect of any Federal and state taxes due
     on the reimbursement.

2.   The Company will cover, up to $750,000 gross, any forfeited bonus from your
     current employer, upon reasonable confirmation of the amount of such
     forfeiture.

3.   The Company will cover reasonable legal costs associated with the review of
     your Employment Agreement by your personal legal counsel.

4.   The Company will reimburse you, through the earlier of your permanent
     relocation to corporate headquarters or September 30, 2002, for the
     reasonable costs associated with your personal travel between Los Angeles
     and your primary residence that are not reimbursable as a client or normal
     business expense.

<PAGE>

Paul C. Reilly
June 6, 2001
Page 2


Please call me with any questions regarding these supplemental terms.

Sincerely,

/s/ Gary C. Hourihan

Gary C. Hourihan
Executive Vice President

cc:  Richard Ferry
     Charles Miller
****EXHIBIT 32.1****

 

****Certificationof Periodic Financial Report****

****Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350****

 

Forpurposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, John Saunders the ChiefExecutive Officer of Integrated Management Information, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

 

(i)           the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)        the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:August 4, 2009

 
| /s/  John Saunders                      |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| John  Saunders, Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

1

----
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 11614

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appell ee

v. DAMION KENTRELL WHITE, also known as D.K. ,
D efendant

- Appell ant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3 :1 4

- C R

- 78

- 2

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, a nd GRAVES , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * Defendant White appeals from the 240

- month sentence he received after the district court accept ed his guilty plea to a violation of 1 8 U.S.C. § 1952(a)(2) based on a predicate offense under 18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)(1). We DISMISS th e appeal. White admits that “ [ t ] he crux of [his] objection in the district court and complaint now on appeal is that his conduct did not constitute a crime of violence

. . . .” (emphasis added). White asks this court to do the very thing

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 14, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-11614 Document: 00514274052 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/14/2017No. 16

- 11614

2 that the Supreme Court has instructed it not to do: look beyond the elements of the offense to the underlying facts to dete rmine whether
18 U.S.C. § 1591(a) (1) is categorically a crime of violence

. In determining whether an offense is a crime of violence, this court looks “only to the statutory definitions

— i.e., the elements

— of a defendant’s offense, and not to the particular facts underlying the convictions.” United States v. Buck , 847 F.3d 267, 27 4 (5th Cir. 2017) (citing Descamps v. United States , 133 S. Ct. 2276, 2283 (2013) ) , cert. denied sub. nom. Allen v. United States , 137 S. Ct. 2231 (2017). White’s brief is not entitled to liberal construction because he is represented by counsel. See Woo dfox v. Cain , 609 F.3d 774, 792 (5th Cir. 2010) . Accordingly, White has not adequately bri efed the only issue he raises. This court has recognized that failure to adequately brief an issue on appeal can constitute waiver of the argument. N.W. Enters., I nc. v. City of
Houston , 352 F.3d 162, 183 n.24 (5th Cir. 2003); see also Fed. R. App.
P. 28(a)(8 )(A); United States v. Martinez , 263 F.3d 436, 438 (5th Cir. 2001); United State s v. Thames , 214 F.3d 608, 611 n.3 (5th Cir. 2000); L & A Contracting Co. v. S. Concrete Servs. , 17 F.3d 106, 113 (5th Cir. 1994); United States v. Beaumont , 972 F.2d 553, 563 (5th Cir. 1992). This court finds that White has w aived by inadequate briefing the only issue he raises . We DISMISS the appeal. Case: 16-11614 Document: 00514274052 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/14/2017
W 21/2016

$2, 56U- OWS

Lf zal dors. had my Efile Call your ofGice mod she WAS beled the

qlee Lits ade LI 21,023-B-l nud LS: 2U,035-B- iis Dewied Lihat Lip Wen) Mider
Po of Wei1201$ Z have Alot retcved. & Mhite mal abbibying me that Uf-

AL093-B-l Adel 24,035-B-1 has bséI Déwiect Abiat Ueithed Ocher. TE am

WNritiog the Aourls, vot to rush mq Process, hut Lf x have bse) Heriéch
Withodt Wattle) Odher Wout zing Mobb tis Beadscing me Lom bingy

£28 ond LI 24933-B-/ } 15.29,/035-B-/ iL ind Dre? Hety fine bee cli)
have ently reteved Denies od Lit? Li b80149-B)-E, bl-ALO39-B-l, ¢

W, 08:084-01-E Mandanos. & Wale DZ be) DeWesal LI thet Liebe). Qber-as
WP 2I,033- BL? We 24,035 Bl aud b Se, When) 2

Mens Lespodd en & Tanzhy Fasha Respcath/ TAE
v/ ‘durk Wis von?
/ Lf Tas
RECEIVED IN
GOURT OF CAMA APPEALS
JUL 97 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Tianyin Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, Dr.
Guoqing Jiang, Chief
Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.








Date:
November 10, 2008





Dr. Guoqing
Jiang


Dr. Guoqing Jiang,


Chief
Executive Officer & Acting Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)                           | The                Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32, fully                complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)                           | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August              17, 2007 |                                                                                                                                    | /s/ William              Solko |
|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                                    | William Solko, Chief Executive Officer                         and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                    |                                                                                                                                    |

----
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November 16,      2009 | By:    | /s/       JEFFREY R.      SMITH                         |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    |   | Jeffrey      R. Smith, PresidentChief      Executive Officer |   |

| Date:  November 16,      2009 | By:    | /s/       JAMES E.      KUNKO                       |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    |   | James      E. Kunko, CFOPrincipal      Financial Officer |   |
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00456-CR

The State of Texas

v.

Dennis M. Taylor

§

§

§

§

§

From the 213th District Court

of Tarrant County (1325354D)

July 23, 2015

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellant The State of Texas shall pay all costs of 

this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM