alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 126 (Thursday, July 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31748-31749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15655]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLNM920000 L13100000 FI0000; NMNM-96574]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
NMNM 96574

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Class II provisions of Title IV, Public Law 97-451, 
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for 
reinstatement of oil and gas lease NMNM 96574 from the lessee, OXY USA, 
Inc., for lands in Lea County, New Mexico. The petition was filed on 
time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the 
lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margie Dupre, Bureau of Land 
Management, New Mexico State Office, P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New 
Mexico 87502 or at (505) 438-7520.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: No valid lease has been issued that affects 
the lands. The lessee agrees to new lease terms for rentals and 
royalties of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year, and 16\2/3\ 
percent, respectively. The lessee paid the required $500.00 
administrative fee for the reinstatement of the lease and $166.00 cost 
for publishing this Notice in the Federal Register. The lessee met all 
the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 
31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). We 
are proposing to reinstate lease NMNM 96574, effective the date of 
termination, October 1, 2008, under the original terms and conditions

[[Page 31749]]

of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.

Margie Dupre,
Land Law Examiner, Fluids Adjudication Team.
[FR Doc. E9-15655 Filed 7-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.5

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                               FNB CAPITAL TRUST I

         THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF FNB Capital Trust I (the "Trust") is being
duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustees, to form a business
trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C. Section 3801, et seq.)
(the "Act").

         1.  Name.  The name of the business trust formed hereby is "FNB Capital
Trust I."

         2.  Delaware Trustee.  The name and business address of the trustee of
the Trust in the State of Delaware is Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square
North, 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001, Attention:
Corporate Trust Administration.

         3.  Effective Date.  This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon
filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

         4.  Counterparts.  This Certificate of Trust may be executed in one or
more counterparts, which, when taken together, shall be deemed to constitute a
single original.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate of
Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act.

                                           WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,
                                           as Trustee



                                              /s/ Patricia A. Evans
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Patricia A. Evans
                                              Senior Financial Services Officer



                                              /s/ Gary L. Tice
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Gary L. Tice, as Trustee



                                              /s/ John D. Waters
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              John D. Waters, as Trustee
NO. CAAP

- 23

- 0000 0 98

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

DOUGLAS ENGINEERING PACIFIC, INC., and OHANA CONTROL SYSTEMS ,

INC., Petitioners

- Appellants

- Appellants , v. BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU ,

Respondent

- Appellee

- Appellee ,

and DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND PERMITTING, and the HONOLULU FIRE DEPARTMENT, Intervenors

- Appellees

- Appellees,

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

( CIVIL NO. 1CCV

- 22

- 0000674 )

ORDER GRANTING WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL

(By: Guidry, J.)

Upon consideration of the Notice of Dis association

From Firm ( Notice of Disassoci ation ) , filed August 20 , 2024, by

Petitioners

- Appell ants

- Appellants Douglas Engineering Pacific,

Inc. ( Douglas ) , and Ohana Control Systems, Inc. ( Ohana ) , which

the court construes as a motion to withdraw as counsel, under Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-23-0000098 21-AUG-2024 10:30 AM Dkt. 51 ORD2

Hawai ʻ i Rules of Appellate Procedure ( HRAP ) Rule 50(a), it

appears that:

(1) Douglas and Ohana are represented in this appeal

by attorneys with the Tsugawa Lau & Muzzi LLC law firm ( TLM ) ;

(2) Attorney Leila M. Rothwell ( Rothwell ) is no longer

associated with TLM ;

(3) Attorney Christopher J. Muzzi ( Muzzi ) will remain

as counsel for Douglas and Ohana , and requests that this court

remove Rothwell as attorney for Douglas and Ohana so that both

paper and electronic notices to Rothwell in this matter shall be

discontinued ;

(4) HRAP Rule 50(a) provides, with respect to

withdrawal, that an attorney moving to withdraw as counsel of

record "must show that notice of the motion was given by service

upon the attorney's client." HRAP Rule 50(a); and

(5) The Certificate of Service signed by Muzzi

certifies that both Douglas and Ohana were duly served with

copies of the Notice of Disassociation at their last known

addresses on August 20, 2024

.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Notice of

Dis association , construed as a motion to withdraw as counsel, is

granted.3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appellate clerk shall

end Rothwell as a party to this appeal in the Judiciary

Information Management System.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, August 21 , 2024.

/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tianyin Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, James Jiayuan Tong, Chief Financial Officer & Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
 
 
 Date: May 16, 2011
 
 
 /s/    James Jiayuan TongJames Jiayuan TongChief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer,Chief Business and Development Officer, Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6349

HOWARD EDWARD HALEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOCTOR BENJAMIN ULEP, M.D.,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, E.T.A.L.;

EDDIE L. PEARSON, Warden; MEDICAL

ADMINISTRATION, E.T.A.L.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District

Judge. (CA-01-259-2)

Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 18, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Howard Edward Haley, Appellant Pro Se.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Howard Edward Haley appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. Haley v. Ulep, No. CA-01-259-2 (E.D. Va. Feb.

6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 23.2


                              ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.
                          Certified Public Accountants
                              25/F., Wing On Centre
                           111 Connaught Road Central
                                    Hong Kong



               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


Osicom Technologies, Inc.
Santa Monica, California


We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 333-28863, 333-22291 and 333-51445) on Form S-3 and No. 333-92111 on Form
S-8 of Osicom Technologies, Inc. of our report, dated March 3, 2000, relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of Uni Precision Industrial Limited and
Subsidiaries as of January 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated
statements of income, cash flows and changes in shareholders' equity for the
years ended January 31, 1999 and 2000, expressed in Hong Kong dollars.




                                                ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.



Hong Kong
May 4, 2000
Exhibit32.2–
Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002.







The
      undersigned, Donald L. Sytsma, Chief
      Financial Officer of Gulf Western Petroleum Corporation (the "Company"), hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
      for the three months ended November 30, 2007 (the "Report") which this statement
      accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





(2)
      the information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  January
      14,
      2008





/s/
                Donald L. SytsmaChief
                Financial Officer(principal
                financial and
                accounting officer)
Tr We Count Or Camry Rreenys OF Teens

Racsron Dennand Massey | LE Wwe Coad OF
F AL PYLE ARSE

ys. PD-0940-15 JUL 16 2015
Tee Seat] Of \EARS SEVENTH panocarene or Wears AN
RECEW ER

Appia Wo. OT 1H= OO\RRCR

Tera Causc Wo. STICK HOM
Disrarck Couat ENTS CoottT],

TeARS

VM cTLOW lo SusPENH Awe A-20S)
Tat Coutlt OF CAT YEA

Jo AE WotoQR REE Dyoek OF

AQPERLS OF YERKES = .
Comrs NEL, Degavon Denneawd Wlassuy LAS SE gevMionck
TZ WANS

An War Aoove Dope pend. AeMOLALA CAASE | MOON
QE WA waskron Se Svspund ae Aahs)

Couey re cy ‘
pmdk Wr SHERERN WAL Sree Noe Rollo worngy®

A W\pesynn 38 Ss Pde WACRACLARAR HEF GAMA PRO SL AMd
JARS AC RCCTSS Te COPISR, RATA, HOW \ainding TAEMENY.

4 Tae Binoy HOORENAOL wood Seon Post NACLDNG on Massy
one Wi Wars So Wend woRtet o@ Co ALMAATS BQurel
LRAT Ase CALPAIN CORY Ror Waa Bresal S WRsge’ds -
\WWRERE FORE , PREMTSES CONSTMERED, Ro gelant parys

Anoer SAAS Cones ARNT Vas Nevion wo Susernd AVL AVS)

Antti Aor Warn xo 9&9 cat ony Lon DAL omegwne\ Qe on.
FILED IN RasererCaly Sdomies,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAI © Qader Denn Deroy
JUL 27 263 Readton Denn ceMesey
Abel Acosta, Cierk BA NR eo Se ANN

Lainey Stony VA TIAS\


= VERSE ELCETLON

T Pardon DuWNAAd Massey lor Stegnetwar WAT Quenmdyy o&
PRQQurany, ANTA at Rots yeny PAOLA AN sdknvemiunss.

ih ~

— Uniuoagy DEORARITON
i Parton PD. Massvy, geo BU EUNronte ertney Qrrsen\yy
AN CAO ACTORTER Sa Wa TEARS Depa®enrey ot CAR ENA DAC
-t, PNA Lomerty CVers, Se Rae wndhot grenry of. QUAHHWW)
ney xv Arps OWS RRL WAAL TR WAS MOON FO
austtnd BAT AA Os) ART WARE Ark comarcr.

Exc cdr on Ws AE day of Awa. 0, SS.

Cdn D. Werte

Rarsxon D Wass)
QOS We - OVD
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Sosa, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 410]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walsh, J.), rendered March 21, 2012, convicting him of petit larceny, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 10.1
 ORBCOMM Inc.
 Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation
 1.
    
    Annual Retainer Fees
 
    
    $35,000 in cash paid quarterly. Directors may elect to defer all or part of the
cash payment of retainer fees (i) until such time as specified, with interest on
deferred amounts accruing quarterly at 120% of the Federal long-term rate set each
month by the Secretary of the Treasury or (ii) by electing to receive restricted
 shares of common stock valued at the closing price of the Companys common stock on
Nasdaq on the date each retainer payment would otherwise be made in cash.
 2.
    
    Committee Membership Fees
 
    
    Audit Committee: $3,000 ($10,000 for the Chairman).
    
    Compensation Committee: $3,000 ($10,000 for the Chairman).
    
    Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee: $3,000 ($10,000 for the Chairman).
    
    Fees are paid quarterly in cash. Directors may elect to defer all or part of the
payment of committee fees (i) until such time as specified, with interest on deferred
amounts accruing quarterly at 120% of the Federal long-term rate set each month by the
Secretary of the Treasury or (ii) by electing to receive restricted shares of common
stock valued at the closing price of the Companys common stock on Nasdaq on the date
each committee fee payment would otherwise be made in cash.
    
    Attendance Fees: $1,000 for each committee meeting attended
 3.
    
    Annual Awards
 
    
    1,850 time-based restricted stock units (RSUs) vesting on December 31 of each year
granted on the date of our annual meeting of shareholders. The RSUs will be granted
to non-employee directors under the Companys 2006 Long-Term Incentives Plan.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Concho Resources Inc.
(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
    May 8, 2009
    
    /s/ Darin G. HoldernessDarin G. HoldernessVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
# table20_q4.2_state
##### 



(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September
30, 2006 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Jerome B. EisenbergJerome B. EisenbergChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
# table183_q17.1_size
#### SELIGSON et al. v. CAMP WESTOVER, Inc.

District Court, S. D. New York.

March 4, 1941.

William Zuckerman, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Edward M. Fuller, of New York City, for defendant.

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

Defendant has moved, pursuant to Rule 30(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to vacate and set aside plaintiffs’ notice and subpoena to take the deposition before trial of the General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, as a witness in plaintiffs’ behalf.

Defendant contends that this court does-not permit such an examination of an insurance company. However, such a contention is not strictly true. Bough v. Lee, D.C., 28 F.Supp. 673; Kulich v. Murray, D.C., 28 F.Supp. 675.

I am of the opinion that this motion must be denied. The court realizes that in most instances the insurance company is the real party in interest and not the assured. It has been held that permitting such an examination “would penalize the diligent and place a premium on laziness”. McCarthy v. Palmer, D.C., 29 F. Supp. 585, 586. Assuming that this neces*734Sarily follows, it must be kept in mind that the new Rules of Civil Procedure are fashioned to eliminate the old concept of litigation as a battle of wits and to provide the tools whereby litigants may bring before a court or jury all the facts from which the truth may be more easily ascertained and substantial justice done. To the extent that this search for the truth infringes on the convenience of litigants, such convenience must yield to that extent.

Insurance companies occupy no different status from that of any other litigant. To permit such a company in a negligence suit to evade examination on any theory other than privilege would amount to an emasculation of the liberal provisions of the new rules, insofar as a plaintiff in such litigation is concerned. Nothing is shown in the moving papers from which this court could find that the matter sought to be obtained is privileged. The mere fact that such information is in the hands of an insurance company or its attorney does not, in and of itself, make such information privileged.
<PAGE>   1


                                 EXHIBIT 22 (a)

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

                                       OF

                          MINUTEMAN INTERNATIONAL, INC.



Multi-Clean Division of Minuteman International, Inc.
600 Cardigan Road
Shoreview, Minnesota  55126

Minuteman Canada, Inc.
2210 Drew Road
Mississauga
Ontario L5S 1B1 Canada

Minuteman International Foreign Sales Corporation
c/o Ernst & Young Services, Ltd.
P.O. Box 261 Bay Street
Bridgetown, Barbados

Minuteman European B.V.
Haverstraat 31
2153 GB Nieuw-Vennep
The Netherlands

Minuteman PowerBoss, Inc.
175 Anderson Street
Aberdeen, North Carolina 28315
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Susser Holdings Corporation (the Company) for the three months ended July 1,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mary E. Sullivan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                             |  |                                                     
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 15, 2007 |  |  |  | SUSSER HOLDINGS CORPORATION
|                      |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | By                          |  | /s/ Mary E. Sullivan                                
|                      |  |  |  |                             |  | Mary E. Sullivan                                    
|                      |  |  |  |                             |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Marc J. EisenbergMarc J. EisenbergChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)