alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4-K


                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                           FORD CREDIT CAPITAL TRUST I


                  The undersigned Trustees of Ford Credit Capital Trust I (the
"Trust"), pursuant to the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C. sec.3801, et
seq.), HEREBY CERTIFY:

                  1. Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is Ford
Credit Capital Trust I.

                  2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the
Delaware Trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware is Chase Manhattan Bank
USA, National Association, c/o JPMorgan Chase, Attention: Institutional Trust
Services, 500 Stanton Christiana Road, Floor3/OPS4, Newark, Delaware 19713.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being all of the Trustees
of the Trust, have executed this Certificate of Trust as of the 7th day of
December, 2001


                                                DELAWARE TRUSTEE:
                                                Chase Manhattan Bank USA,
                                                    National Association



                                                By: /s/ John J. Cashin
                                                --------------------------------
                                                    Name: John J. Cashin
                                                    Title: Vice President




                                                TRUSTEES:


                                                /s/ Douglas J. Cropsey
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Douglas J. Cropsey


                                                /s/ Stacy P. Thomas
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Stacy P. Thomas
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

      CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony A. Cook, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report of DCP Holding Company (the
"Company') on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 12a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

            b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

            b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2006

Signature:  /s/ Anthony A. Cook
            Anthony A. Cook
            Principal Executive Officer

                                       1
#### In the Matter of Elizabeth Hogan, Appellant, v New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal et al., Respondents.

[822 NYS2d 736]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of the respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal dated January 28, 2004, as granted, in part, the owner’s petition for administrative review, denied, in part, the petitioner’s petition for administrative review, and modified an order of the Rent Administrator issued on August 27, 2002, granting, in part, the owner’s application for a major capital improvement rent increase, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated January 24, 2005, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (hereinafter the DHCR) acted within its discretion in rejecting the answer of the petitioner’s attorney to the owner’s application for a major capital improvement rent increase. The petitioner’s attorney failed to submit evidence of his authorization to act, as is required by the DHCR (see 9 NYCRR 2523.6, 2529.1 [b] [2]).

Furthermore, the DHCR rationally determined that the owner was entitled to a rent increase for necessary work performed in connection with, and directly related to, a major capital improvement (see 9 NYCRR 2522.4).

*1002The petitioner’s remaining contentions either are improperly raised for the first time on appeal or are without merit. Adams, J.E, Skelos, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Susser Holdings Corporation (the Company) for the three months ended June 29,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mary E. Sullivan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                             |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 8, 2008 |  | SUSSER HOLDINGS CORPORATION
|                     |  |                            
|                     |  | By                          |  | /s/ Mary E. Sullivan                                
|                     |  |                             |  | Mary E. Sullivan                                    
|                     |  |                             |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Consolidated
Financial Statements as of June 30, 1997 and 1996 of SETECH, Inc. and
Subsidiaries together with Report of Independent Public Accountants and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,633,559
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,560,591
<ALLOWANCES>                                   110,689
<INVENTORY>                                 17,305,262
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,413,672
<PP&E>                                       3,805,210
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,058,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,272,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,583,760
<BONDS>                                      1,862,630
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,690
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,610,218
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,272,224
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,167,717
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,500,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,055,716
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             769,636
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                941,599
<INCOME-TAX>                                   428,026
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            513,573
<DISCONTINUED>                                     343
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   513,916
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        

</TABLE>
#### Burmaa CHOGSOM, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-71756.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 9, 2012.*

Filed Nov. 30, 2012.

Lori Beth Schoenberg, Law Offices of John R. Perry, Encino, CA, for Petitioner.

Kelly J. Walls, Esquire, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: KLEINFELD and BERZON, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, District Judge.**

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable William E. Smith, District Judge for the U.S. District Court the District of Rhode Island, sitting by designation.

*705MEMORANDUM ***

Petitioner Burmaa Chogsom petitions for review of a BIA decision denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We reject her arguments and deny her petition for review.

We review factual findings underlying the BIA’s denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture for substantial evidence. *Ahmed v. Keisler,*504 F.3d 1183, 1191 (9th Cir.2007). Chogsom claims that she was persecuted in Mongolia because of her membership in the Mongolian Democratic Party and because she was a descendent of Mongolian nobility. However, reviewing the record as a whole, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Chog-som’s political opinions and social group were not a central reason for any mistreatment she may have suffered. *Parussimo-va v. Mukasey,*555 F.3d 734, 741 (9th Cir.2009). Since Chogsom cannot meet her burden of proof for asylum, she necessarily cannot qualify for withholding of removal. *Kumar v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 520, 525 (9th Cir.2006).

Chogsom claims she is entitled to relief under the Convention Against Torture because she suffered torture when her ex-husband’s ex-wife attacked and harassed her. However, the record shows that the police protected Chogsom from the alleged attacks on multiple occasions, and Chog-som has no evidence to show that the government in any way participated in her mistreatment. Therefore, even if Chog-som’s mistreatment constituted torture, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that the mistreatment was not done “with the consent or acquiescence of a public official.” *Abufayad v. Holder,*632 F.3d 623, 632 (9th Cir.2011) (quoting 8 C.F.R. § 1208.18(a)(2)).

Finally, Chogsom argues that she was denied due process in her proceeding before the IJ because she received inadequate translation. We cannot consider this claim because Chogsom failed to exhaust it in her appeal to the BIA. *Meihua Huang v. Mukasey,*520 F.3d 1006, 1008 (9th Cir.2008) (per curiam).

PETITION DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Rail Employer Reporting Instructions 

Appendix III: Railroad Retirement Board Jurisdiction Guide 

The following subjects are outside the compensation area. This guide provides employers 

with an office within the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) they may contact with 

questions on these subjects. Railroad employees should always be referred to the RRB's 

district offices with any questions. 

SUBJECT OFFICE CONTACT INFORMATION 

Annual Earnings Exempt Amounts for 

Annuity Work Deductions 

Bureau of the Actuary 

Division of Benefit and Employment 

Analysis 

(312) 751-4771 

Benefit Eligibility/Payment Status Local RRB Field Office 

(877) 772-5772 

Cost-of-Living Percentage Increases Bureau of the Actuary 

Division of Benefit and Employment 

Analysis 

(312) 751-4771 

Creditable/Taxable Earnings Base 

Estimates 

Bureau of the Actuary 

Division of Benefit and Employment 

Analysis 

(312) 751-4771, (312) 751-4729 

Divorce/Garnishment Bureau of Law 

(312) 751-4944 

Form DC-1 Bureau of Fiscal Operations 

Treasury Division 

(312) 751-4668 

Form 1099-G, Statement for Receipt of 

Certain Government Payments 

(Unemployment Benefit Income Tax 

Statements) 

Local RRB Field Office 

(877) 772-5772 

Gross Earnings Reports (BA-11) Bureau of the Actuary 

Division of Benefit and Employment 

Analysis 

(312) 751-4705 

Report of Stock Options and Other 

Payments (BA-15) 

Bureau of the Actuary and Research 

Financial Interchange Division 

(312) 469-2286 

BA15@rrb.gov 

RRB-1099/1099-R, Statement for U.S. 

Citizen Recipients of Payments by the 

Railroad Retirement Board 

Form RRB-1042S, Statement for Nonresident Alien Recipients of Payments by 

the Railroad Retirement Board 

(Retirement Benefit Income Tax 

Statements) 

Local RRB Field Office 

(877) 772-5772 

Policy & Systems 

Records & Analysis Systems 

(312) 751-4810 
Rail Employer Reporting Instructions 

Appendix III: Railroad Retirement Board Jurisdiction Guide 

SUBJECT OFFICE CONTACT INFORMATION 

Notice of Death of Annuitant Local RRB Field Office 

(877) 772-5772 

Request for Lien Amount under Section 

12(o) of the RUIA 

Operations – RUIA Adjudication 

Claims Adjustment and Settlement 

Section 

(312) 751-4825
H. Res. 80 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 28, 2019. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, ranked as follows on the following standing committees of the House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND LABOR: Mr. Walker 

(to rank immediately after Mr. Banks). 

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY: Mr. McCaul (to 

rank immediately after Mr. King of New York); and Mr. Higgins of Louisiana (to rank immediately after Mr. Walker). 

Attest: 

Clerk.
| Subsidiaries      of Registrant                    |
|----------------------------------------------------|
|                                               |   |   |
|                                               |   |   |
|                                               |   |   |
| Subsidiary                                         |   | Jurisdiction of  Organization |
|                                               |   |   |
|                                               |   |   |
| American      VitalCare, LLC                       |   | State      of California |
| RehabCare      Group East, Inc.                    |   | State      of Delaware |
| RehabCare      Group Management Services, Inc.     |   | State      of Delaware |
| RehabCare      Group of California, LLC            |   | State      of Delaware |
| RehabCare      Group of Texas, LLC                 |   | State      of Texas |
| Salt      Lake Physical Therapy Associates, Inc.   |   | State      of Utah |
| Phase      2 Consulting, Inc.                      |   | State      of Delaware |
| RehabCare      Hospital Holdings, LLC              |   | State      of Delaware |
| West      Gables Rehabilitation Hospital, LLC      |   | State      of Delaware |
| Clear      Lake Rehabilitation Hospital, LLC       |   | State      of Delaware |
| Lafayette      Specialty Hospital, LLC             |   | State      of Delaware |
| Tulsa      Specialty Hospital, LLC                 |   | State      of Delaware |
| Louisiana      Specialty Hospital, LLC             |   | State      of Delaware |
| RehabCare      Group of Arlington, L.P.            |   | State      of Texas |
| RehabCare      Group of Amarillo, L.P.             |   | State      of Texas |
| RehabCare      Group of Midland, L.P.              |   | State      of Texas |
| Cannon      & Associates, LLC                  |   | State      of Delaware |
| RehabWorks,      LLC                               |   | State      of Delaware |
| Symphony      Health Services, LLC                 |   | State      of Delaware |
| VTA      Management Services, LLC                  |   | State      of Delaware |
| VTA      Staffing Services, LLC                    |   | State      of Delaware |
| Northland      LTACH, LLC                          |   | State      of Delaware |
| CTRH,      LLC                                     |   | State      of Delaware |
| Central      Texas Specialty Hospital, LLC         |   | State      of Delaware |
| St.      Luke’s Rehabilitation Hospital, LLC |   | State      of Delaware |
| The      Specialty Hospital, LLC                   |   | State      of Georgia |
| Greater      Peoria Specialty Hospital, LLC        |   | State      of Delaware |
|                                               |   |   |
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Larry Reid, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cleartronic, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. I am the only certifying officer responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the Board of Directors:

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: February 19, 2019