alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Criminal No, 07-143 (SRC)

MARCKESE STEWART

ORDER REQUIRING

ACCOMODATION FOR

ATTORNEY TELEPHONE

CONFERENCES

This matter having been opened to the Court by Bruce S. Rosen. appointed

counsel for Markese Stewart, with consent of the United States (Melissa L. Jampol, Asst.

U.S. Attorney appearing), and the Court finding good cause for the issuance of this

Order, and it is,

ORDERED that South Woods State Prison in Bridgeton. N.J. be required

to provide inmate Markese Stewart, inmate number 590649/ SBI 000150812C, with

telephonic access to his attorney. Bruce S. Rosen. no later than 11 am. Wednesday. May

4, 2011 and at such other times through Wednesday May 11. 2011 as required by Mr.

Rosen. with two-hour notice to prison officials.

SO ORDERED

ON STANLEY R CHFSLER U S D J

Dated:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-4051

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ANDRE VALENTINO PIERRE,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief

District Judge. (3:13-cr-00334-FDW-1)

Submitted: July 20, 2015 Decided: July 24, 2015

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ross Hall Richardson, Executive Director, Ann L. Hester, FEDERAL 

DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Charlotte, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Andre Valentino Pierre pled guilty to bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. 

§ 2113(a) (2012), and was sentenced to 151 months in prison. He 

now appeals. His attorney has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising one issue but 

stating that there are no meritorious issues for appeal. Pierre 

was advised of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief but 

has not filed such a brief. We affirm. 

Our review of the transcript of the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 

proceeding discloses that the district court fully complied with 

the Rule. Pierre admitted his guilt and acknowledged that the 

Factual Basis offered in support of the plea was correct. Finally, 

the record establishes that the plea was knowingly and voluntarily 

entered.

Pierre’s correctly calculated Guidelines range was 151-188 

months. At sentencing, counsel asked for a sentence below this 

range. As counsel acknowledges in the Anders brief, the sentencing 

transcript refutes Pierre’s present claim that the district court 

did not address counsel’s arguments in favor of a downward 

variance. Although the court specifically rejected the request 

for a variance, the court found that a sentence at the low end of 

Pierre’s Guidelines range was appropriate. We accord a presumption 

of reasonableness to Pierre’s within-Guidelines sentence, see

United States v. Abu Ali, 528 F.3d 210, 261 (4th Cir. 2008), and 
3

find that Pierre failed to rebut this presumption. See United 

States v. Montes-Pineda, 445 F.3d 375, 379 (4th Cir. 2006). 

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire record 

in this case and have found no meritorious grounds for appeal. We 

therefore affirm. This court requires that counsel inform Pierre, 

in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the 

United States for further review. If Pierre requests that a 

petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would 

be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to 

withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a 

copy of the motion was served on Pierre. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not 

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We do hereby consent to the use of our report dated May 9, 2001 on the financial
statement of Raquel, Inc. (a Nevada corporation) included in and made part of
the registration statement of Raquel, Inc. Dated December 20, 2001.

December 20, 2001


/s/ Oppenheim & Ostrick
Gil Ostrick
Oppenheim & Ostrick, CPA's
Certified Public Accountants
EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Atlantis Plastics, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-25983
and 33-41012) of our reports dated February 7, 1997, except for Note 7, as to
which the date is March 28, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Atlantis Plastics, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for 
each of the three years in the period ended Decemebr 31, 1996 which reports are 
included in this Form 10-K.


                                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Atlanta, Georgia
March 28, 1997
# table84_q10.3_size
@article{11326,
  author = {Nadir Faradzhev and Monica McEntee and John Yate and Shannon Hill and Thomas Lucatorto},
  title = {EUV-Driven Carbonaceous Film Deposition and Its Photo-oxidation on a TiO2 Film Surface},
  year = {2013},
  month = {2013-09-23},
  publisher = {Journal of Physical Chemistry C},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4091427},
  language = {en},
}
Exhibit 31.2

I, Andrew J. Norstrud, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Stem Cell Therapy International,
Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the condensed consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the condensed consolidated financial
condition, consolidated results of operations and consolidated cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a  15(f) and 15d  15(f) for the registrant have:

a) designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                       |  |  |  |                                   |  |                  
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|/s/ Andrew J. Norstrud |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Chief |  | November 14, 2008
|                       |  |  |  | Accounting Officer                |  |
# Result 22.5
November 8, 2012 www.bls.gov

Data Users Advisory Committee (DUAC) Agenda

Kathy Frederickson-Mele • Mele.Kathy@bls.gov • http://www.bls.gov/bls/duac.htm • 202.691.6102

8:30 a.m. Registration

8:45 a.m. Introductions, welcome, and brief review of agency developments (Jack Galvin)

9:15 a.m. Misunderstood statistics: Helping Users understand the limitations of BLS data (Tom 

Nardone, Linda Ewing, and Gary Gates)

10:15 a.m. Break

10:30 a.m. Errors and errata - How best to present to the public (Jay Meisenheimer, Maurine Haver)

11:30 a.m. Lunch

1:00 p.m. Documenting BLS methodology - How best to present to the public (Emily Liddel, Bob 

Eddy, and Kathryn Kobe)

2:00 p.m. Balancing Confidentiality and Quality Concerns for BLS Data Users (Mike Buso, Bill 

Wascher)

3:00 p.m. Break

3:15 p.m. Previewing Data Finder: a new LABSTAT data query tool (Mark Thomas, Marie Mora)

4:15 p.m. Meeting wrap-up
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. (“BGH”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Vance E. Powers, Acting Chief FinancialOfficer of MainLine Management LLC, thegeneral partner of BGH, hereby certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of BGH.

 

 
|                    | MAINLINE  MANAGEMENT LLC, as general partner of BGH |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                    |                                                |
| Date: October  29, 2007 | /s/ Vance E.  Powers                                |
|                    | Vance E. Powers                                     |
|                    | *Acting  Chief Financial Officer*                   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                        2,231,481
<SECURITIES>                  3,205,293 <F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        19,322,975 <F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                3,238,758
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                21,553,997                   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         173,383
<BONDS>                       0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      21,380,614 <F3>
<OTHER-SE>                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  21,553,997                   
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              2,535,618 <F4>
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 1,047,225 <F5>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              (347,670) <F6>
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               0
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  1,836,063
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0
<FN>
<F1>   "SECURITIES" REPRESENTS INVESTMENTS IN JOINT VENTURE
<F2>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
BUILDING]
<F3>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERS CAPITAL
<F4>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
INCOME
<F5>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES
<F6>   "OTHER EXPENSES" REPRESENTS EQUITY INTEREST IN JOINT
       VENTURES' NET INCOME
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 10(r)

                             AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE
                       PEDIATRIC SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC.
                    NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

      Pediatric Services of America, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the
"Corporation"), has previously established the Pediatric Services of America,
Inc. Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan") for the benefit of a
select group of employees and their beneficiaries. The Corporation previously
approved an amendment to be made to the Plan to permit Tier I Participants
(designated as such under Section 2.3 of the Plan) to defer some or all of their
bonus compensation in addition to base pay. The purpose of this Amendment is to
document such amendment.

      NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with Section 7.1 of the Plan and pursuant to
resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors on August 1, 2000, Section 1.11 of
the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of August 1, 2001, to read in its
entirety as follows:

         "1.12. Plan Year Compensation means for purposes of the elections
                ----------------------
      under Section 2.4 of the Plan, the annual base salary paid to a
      Participant by the Company during any Plan Year, or portion thereof in
      which he is a Participant in this Plan, as reflected on the Participant's
      form W-2. For Tier I employees (designated as such under Section 2.3)
      only, Plan Year Compensation shall include bonus compensation, if any, in
      addition to base salary. For purposes of the elections under Section 2.4
      and the limitations under Section 3.1 of the Plan, the election by Tier I
      employees to defer amounts out of bonus compensation shall be made, if at
      all, (a) separately from the election to defer out of base salary and (b)
      prior to the date a discretionary bonus is declared during a Plan Year or
      prior to the beginning of the Plan Year if the bonus is non-discretionary;
      provided, however, that for the Plan Year during which this Amendment is
      adopted, such election may be made within 30 days after the effective date
      of this Amendment, regardless of the type of bonus. For purposes hereof, a
      "non-discretionary bonus" means a bonus which is determined under a
      formula established for the Plan Year for which the bonus is earned."

      Executed at Norcross, Georgia on September 19, 2001.

                                            PEDIATRIC SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC.


                                            By /s/ Joseph D. Sansone
                                              ---------------------------------
                                                   Joseph D. Sansone, President
TERRY D. BRIGHT,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON 

OFFENDER REVIEW,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5303

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 12, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

Terry D. Bright, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sarah J. Rumph, General Counsel, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

ROBERTS, J.

The Appellant, Terry D. Bright, appeals the decision of the First Judicial 

Circuit Court in Santa Rosa County to transfer his petition for writ of habeas corpus 

to the First Judicial Circuit Court in Escambia County. We agree that the Santa Rosa 

County Court had the proper jurisdiction to review the petition. 
The trial court transferred the petition in this case after finding that the 

Appellant was attacking the legality of his original classification as a habitual felony 

offender. See Coakley v. State, 43 So. 3d 790 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (finding that the 

trial court that imposed the sentence has jurisdiction when an appellant attempts to 

attack his conviction by raising issues relating to the trial or the propriety of a plea). 

However, as conceded by the Appellee, the trial court’s interpretation of the petition 

was incorrect. 

Section 79.09, Florida Statutes (2014), provides that petitions for writ of 

habeas corpus must be filed with the clerk of the circuit court of the county in which 

the prisoner is detained. Here, the Appellant was incarcerated in Santa Rosa County 

at the time of filing and has since been transferred to a work camp in Escambia 

County. Because the Appellant was incarcerated in Santa Rosa County at the time 

of filing, the Santa Rosa County circuit court has jurisdiction over the petition. 

Accordingly, we REVERSE the transfer of the petition.

CLARK and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.

2
Services Offered: 

Pre-Litigation Inspections

Rule 34 Inspections

Courtroom Testimony December 10,2010

Statement:

To: For:

Anthony J. Brady, Esq. North Wildwood

Lasky and Hammill

UNIT DESCRIPTION RATE TOTAL 

 10 hr. Formal Inspection 150.00 1500.00

8 hr. Report Preparation 150.00 1200.00

2 hr. Research 150.00 300.00

1.5 hr. Cost Estimates and 

Solutions 150.00 225.00

3 hr. Travel 75.00 225.00

 Sub-Total $3450.00

UNIT DESCRIPTION RATE TOTAL 

 2 hr. Supplementary Inspection 150.00 300.00

4 hr. Report Preparation 150.00 600.00

1 hr. Solutions 150.00 150.00

3 hr. Travel 75.00 225.00

 Sub-Total $1275.00

 

 
UNIT DESCRIPTION RATE TOTAL 

 43 hr. Formal Inspection 150.00 6450.00

25 hr. Report Preparation 150.00 3750.00

6 hr. Cost Esimates and 

Solutions 150.00 900.00

8 hr. Travel 75.00 375.00

Hotel 1 week 650.00

Car Rental 1 Week 460.00

Total $12585.00

UNIT DESCRIPTION RATE TOTAL 

 4 hr. Inspection of Beach

Elements 150.00 600.00

2 hr. Verbal report 150.00 300.00

3 hr. Travel 75.00 225.00

Total $1125.00

 Grand Total $18435.00

Page 2 - North Wildwood Invoice
EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We  consent  to the incorporation by reference in the registration Statements on
Form  S-8  (File  Nos. 33-33497, 33-40038, 33-60214 and 33-60644) of our reports
dated  August  21,  2001  relating  to  the consolidated financial statements of
Criticare  Systems,  Inc.  appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for  the  year  ended  June  30,  2001.



/s/  BDO  Seidman,  LLP
Milwaukee,  Wisconsin
September 26, 2001
Occupational Outlook Quarterly • Spring 2005

44

Time, and how we use it, is 

the subject of the newest 

survey from the U.S. Bureau 

of Labor Statistics. One conclusion: 

time use varies by age. 

The American Time Use Survey counts the hours that people in 

the United States devote to sleep, 

paid work, and leisure and other 

activities. As the charts show, 15- to 

24-year-olds differed from 25- to 

34-year-olds in the way that they 

spent their time on weekdays in 

2003. People in the younger age 

group spent most of their waking 

hours on leisure and sports activities, 

for example, while work dominated 

daytime pursuits for the older group. 

And educational activities consumed 

much more of the younger group’s 

time.

The data in these charts are averages, so they mask some variations 

within the groups. For example, 15-

year-olds spend much of their weekdays in school, and 24-year-olds are 

more likely to be working than going 

to school. But educational activity is 

understated for youths because the 

data are averages for all respondents 

and because the data include hours 

reported for all weekdays—not just 

those during the school year.

The survey gathers data drawn 

from telephone interviews questioning respondents about their activities 

on the previous day. This information is then coded into more than 400 

activity categories that can be analyzed in a number of ways, including 

by respondents’ sex, employment 

status, and education level. For more 

information, call the U.S. Bureau of 

Labor Statistics, (202) 691-6339, or 

visit the American Time Use Survey 

on the Web at 

www.bls.gov/tus/home.htm.

How we spent our time in 2003

1

 If people do two or more activities at once, only the primary activity is recorded. The time 

 spent traveling to an activity was counted as time spent on that activity. 

2

 “Other” includes, for example, civic, organizational, and religious activities; making purchases; 

 and eating and drinking.

 3 On days that they attended school, 15-year-olds averaged 8.4 hours on education-related 

 activities.

Activity1 and weekday hours spent

Sleeping

(8.8 hours)

Caring for and helping 

household members

(0.3 hours) Household activities

(0.8 hours) Education-related 

activities3

(2.9 hours)

Working and 

work-related 

activities

(3.1 hours)

Other2

(3.3 hours)

Leisure and sports

(4.9 hours)

15- to 24-year

-olds

Sleeping

(8.2 hours)

Leisure and sports

(3.6 hours)

Other2

(3.1 hours)

Education-related activities

(0.3 hours)

Caring for and helping household members

(1.2 hours)

Household activities

(1.4 hours)

Working and workrelated activities

(6.2 hours)

25- to 34-year

-olds
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LifeCare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Phillip B. Douglas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 12, 2011



/s/ Phillip B. DouglasPhillip B. DouglasChief Executive Officer




32