alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
40 Occupational Outlook Quarterly ● Fall 2001

Highest paying occupations

usually requiring at least

a bachelor’s degree

21,210

3,750

2,590

430

19,180

19,890

280

500

340

1,180

1,320

6,440

340

1,550

2,010

16,870

34,140

17,060

630

17,910

More than

$124,820

110,160

91,750

79,530

78,170

75,320

74,260

73,240

71,310

68,480

66,950

66,220

65,560

64,760

63,930

62,260

61,910

60,400

57,970

57,300

Engineering, natural science, and computer

and information systems manager

Advertising, marketing, promotions, public

relations, and sales manager

Annual average job openings due to

net replacement needs and growth,

Occupation projected 1998-2008

Median annual earnings for

wage and salary jobs, 1998

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Bachelor’s degree

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Bachelor’s degree plus experience

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa First professional degree

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Doctorate

aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa Physician

aaaaaaaaaaaa Dentist aaaa

aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa Aircraft pilot and flight engineer

aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa Podiatrist

aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa Lawyer

aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa Petroleum engineer

aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa Physicist and astronomer

aaaaaaaaaaaa Nuclear engineer aaaa

aaaaaaaaaaaa Optometrist aaaa

aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa Aerospace engineer

aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa Pharmacist

aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa Actuary

aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa Chemical engineer

aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa Chiropractor

aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa Electrical and electronics engineer

aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa Computer engineer

aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa Education administrator

aaaaaaaaaaaa Materials engineer aaaa

The highest paying

occupations usually requiring a

bachelor’s degree or more

education were among those

that commanded the top

salaries in the workforce

overall in 1998. The bachelor’s

degree or more education

group comprises 5 of 11

training categories identified

by the Bureau of Labor

Statistics for classifying

occupations by education level.

For many of these

occupations, including

materials engineer and

aircraft pilot and flight

engineer, a bachelor’s degree

is sufficient for entry into the

field. However, others—such

as advertising, marketing,

promotions, public relations,

and sales manager—usually

require that workers have

experience in a related

occupation in addition to a

bachelor’s degree. Still others,

including physician, dentist,

and lawyer, require substantial

additional education beyond a

bachelor’s degree.

In addition to high earnings,

these occupations are

projected to have openings for

thousands of new workers

annually through 2008. The

number of openings will vary

by occupation, from more

than 34,000 for computer

engineers to fewer than 300

for petroleum engineers.

Annual job openings are the

result of an occupation’s

growth and of the need to

replace workers who retire or

leave the occupation

permanently for other

reasons.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the annual report of Driver Passport Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy
Brown, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company. and will be retained by the
Company. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.




DRIVER
      PASSPORT, INC.Date:
      April 28, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Randy
      BrownRandy
      BrownChief
      Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
PD-0622-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 7/21/2015 3:07:23 PM

Accepted 7/22/2015 4:55:30 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

BERNARD CAMPBELL,

 Plaintiff,

v.

JAMES GIBB, et al.,

 Defendants.

HON. JEROME B. SIMANDLE

Civil No. 10-6584 (JBS/JS)

ORDER

Presently before the court is Plaintiff Bernard Campbell's

motion for default judgment as to Eric Holder, United States

Attorney General [Docket Item 37]. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 provides

that default may be entered "when a party against whom a judgment

for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise

defend." Eric Holder was not sued as a defendant in this case;

rather he was required to be served with a copy of a summons and

the Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i) because

the Plaintiff brought this action against officers of the United

States. Consequently, as Eric Holder is not a party to this

suit, he was not required to respond to the Plaintiff's complaint

and default cannot be entered against him.

WHEREFORE IT IS this 12th day of September, 2012 hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for default judgment [Docket

Item 37] will be denied.

 s/ Jerome B. Simandle 

JEROME B. SIMANDLE

Chief U.S. District Judge

Case 1:10-cv-06584-JBS-JS Document 39 Filed 09/12/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 239
#### OKUN v. KASTNER.

No. *5010.*

District Court, D. Rhode Island.

Feb. 19, 1941.

Herbert B. Barlow, of Providence, R. I., for Okun.

Nathaniel Frucht, of Providence, R. I., for Kastner.

HARTIGAN, District Judge.

Objection has been made to the following motion filed under Rule 34 of the Rules of Civil Procedure of the District Court of the United States, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c:

> “The senior party, William Kastner, moves the Court for an order requiring Herbert B. Barlow, attorney for the party Okun, to produce the following document for insertion into the record:

> “Letter on letterhead of Atlas Flow Surfacing Machinery Corp., dated April 28, 1939, addressed to H. Barlow and signed by N. N. Okun. Said document has been offered in evidence as Exhibí*- E in behalf of the party Kastner.

> “Herbert B. Barlow has the possession, custody and control of said document, and said document constitutes or contains evidence relevant and material to this action, as is more fully shown in Exhibit A hereto attached.”

- Rule 34 provides in part: “Upon motion of any party showing good cause therefor and upon notice to all other parties, the court in which an action is pending may (1) order any party to produce and permit the inspection and copying or photographing, by or on behalf of the moving party, of any designated documents, papers, books, accounts, letters, photographs, objects, or tangible things, not privileged, which constitute or contain evidence material to any matter involved in the action and which are in his possession, custody, or control; * * * ”

The petitioner alleges that the letter referred to in his motion is relevant to the issues in an interference between William Kastner and Nathanial Okun in the United States Patent Office, Interference No. 78305.

There is no action pending in this court between said parties in the interference proceedings.

Section 22712 of Hughes Federal Practice, vol. 18, at page 196, states: “Rule 34 contemplates that the procedure thereunder shall be only against an adverse party, in a pending action. Thus a petition of an administrator of a deceased who was killed while on board employer’s tug, requesting inspection of the tug, photographs, etc., where administrator had merely retained counsel to prosecute a wrongful death action against the employer, could not be granted, since there was no ‘action pending’ within the rule. * * * ” See Egan v. Moran Towing & Transportation Co., Inc. et al., D.C., 26 F.Supp. 621.

“Since Rule 34 is applicable only to parties, a witness can be compelled to produce ‘books, papers, or documents’ only by a subpoena duces tecum, whether upon the taking of his deposition before trial or at the trial itself.” Moore’s Federal Practice, vol. 2, p. 2631.

It does not seem to me that the motion is proper under Rule 34 and is therefore denied.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED KAREN LEE CHAGNON,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D 16

- 2813 STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion file d January 31, 2017 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County , Anthony M. Tatti , Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Glendon George Gordon, Jr. , Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Karen L ee Chagnon, Ocala, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Moore v. State , 882 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 2004).

COHEN, C.J. , ORFINGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
No. 01-15-00279-CR 

 

In the

COURT OF APPEALS 

For the

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

at Houston

On Appeal from the 338th Judicial District Court of

Harris County, Texas

in Cause Number 1344346 

JOSEPH JUAN FACUNDO, Appellant 

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

__________________________

APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF 

______________________________ 

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Joseph Juan Facundo, Appellant herein, by and through his 

attorney of record, Patrick F. McCann, and files this, his Motion for Extension of 

Time. In support of said motion, Appellant would show the Court the following:

1. Counsel has a death appellee’s brief due to the Fifth Circuit on August 3rd and 

a Certificate of Appealability due the same day in Norris v. Stephens. 

 

2. Counsel had sought and obtained a continuance of a federal medicare fraud 

case in United States v. Tsolak Gevorgyan but upon government objection, the 

ACCEPTED

01-15-00279-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/23/2015 4:58:51 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/23/2015 4:58:51 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
federal district court judge reinstated the August 17th trial date so we are now 

headed to jury trial in this matter beginning August 17th. Counsel must 

prepare to represent his client in this very complex fraud case. 

 

3. Counsel is also preparing for a non-death capital trial in State of Texas v. Rene 

Lopez in the 180th district court. 

 

4. Counsel is working on an appellate brief on a death penalty appeal in Rivers v. 

State.

5. For the reasons set forth above, Appellant respectfully requests that he be 

granted an extension of thirty (30) days so that his brief in this case will now 

be due on August 27th, 2015, and the Court will accept the filed brief.

PRAYER 

 WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant respectfully requests that 

this Court grant his Motion for Extension of Time.

Respectfully submitted,

The Law Offices of Patrick McCann

 

By: /s/ Patrick F. McCann

 Patrick F. McCann

 SBN: 00792680

 909 Texas Avenue, Suite 205

 Houston, Texas 77002

 Phone: (713) 223-3805

 eFax: (281) 667-3352

[2]
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

This is to certify that on July 23, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above and 

foregoing document was served on:

Mr. Alan Curry Via email: Curry_Alan@dao.hctx.net

Chief Prosecutor, Appellate Division

Harris County District Attorney’s Office

1201 Franklin Street, Ste. 600

Houston, TX 77002-1923

 /s/ Patrick F. McCann

 Patrick F. McCann

[3]
CCA # 13-13-00544-CR

STYLE: Ex Parte Markus Antonius Green v.

TRIAL COURT: 24th District Court

TRIAL COURT #: 90-1-7951 & 90-1-7951-

A

TRIAL COURT JUDGE: Hon. Kemper Stephen

Williams

DISPOSITION: Affirmed

DATE:

JUSTICE:

PUBLISH:

CLKRECORD:

RPTRECORD:

STATE BR:

APPBR:

PC S

DNP:

OFFENSE: Habeas Corpus VJ3-/S"

COUNTY: De Witt

FOR REHEARING IS:

DATE: March 12, 2015

JUDGE: ChiefJustice Valdez

SUPPCLKRECORD X_

SUPP RPT RECORD X_

SUPP BR

PROSE BR X

MOTION

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

V32-/5"

V33-AT

PRO SB Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

CCA IS:

JUDGE:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN

ON

CCA#

Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH:

Y OF MAN

ON

DNP:

MOTION FOR STA IDATE IS:

JUDGE:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-81,495-02

EX PARTE DERRICK JERMAILE SHERFIELD, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1264401-A IN THE 179TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

robbery and sentenced to thirty-five years’ imprisonment. According to the record, he did not appeal

his conviction.

Applicant contends that he filed a “motion for appeal” on December 13, 2012, and that

counsel advised him that he had to file the appeal himself. The trial court made findings of fact and

conclusions of law in response to Applicant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim. It

recommended that we deny relief. 
2

We do not believe that the record is adequate to resolve Applicant’s claims. Applicant has

alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte

Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for

findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, §

3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make further findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether

Applicant waived his right to appeal. Although there is not a waiver of appeal in the plea papers that

were forwarded to this Court, the judgment says that appeal was waived and permission to appeal

was not granted. The trial court shall also make further findings and conclusions as to whether

Applicant filed a timely and proper pro se notice of appeal or a document purporting to be a notice

of appeal. Finally, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant was denied his right to appeal.

The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems

relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
3

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: September 17, 2014

Do not publish
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 807 

Recognizing the roles and the contributions of America’s certified registered 

nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) and their role in providing quality health 

care for the public. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2020 

Ms. SCHAKOWSKY (for herself, Mr. GRAVES of Missouri, and Ms. ROYBALALLARD) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the roles and the contributions of America’s 

certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) and their 

role in providing quality health care for the public. 

Whereas certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) are 

essential to America’s health care system, providing highquality, cost-effective anesthesia care for more than 150 

years; 

Whereas CRNAs safely administer approximately 49 million 

anesthetics to patients each year; 

Whereas CRNAs are the primary providers of anesthesia care 

in rural America, enabling health care facilities in these 

medically underserved areas to offer obstetrical, surgical, 

trauma stabilization, and pain management services; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 807 IH 

Whereas CRNAs practice in every setting in which anesthesia 

is delivered, including traditional hospital surgical suites 

and obstetrical delivery rooms; the offices of dentists, podiatrists, ophthalmologists, and plastic surgeons; ambulatory surgical centers; and United States Military and 

Public Health Services and Department of Veterans Affairs medical facilities; 

Whereas nurse anesthetists first provided anesthesia to 

wounded soldiers during the Civil War and have been the 

main provider of anesthesia care to United States military personnel on the front lines since World War I, including all current United States military actions around 

the globe; and 

Whereas the purpose of National CRNA Week, held January 

19, 2020, through January 25, 2020, is to raise public 

awareness of and celebrate the Nation’s 54,000 certified 

registered nurse anesthetists and student registered 

nurse anesthetists: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives thanks 

2 and promotes the profession of certified registered nurse 

3 anesthetists (CRNAs) by encouraging patients, hospital 

4 administrators, health care professionals, policymakers, 

5 and others to become more familiar with the CRNA cre6 dential and the exceptional advanced practice registered 

7 nurses who have earned it by participating in National 

8 CRNA Week. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
period ended June 30, 2009 (the Report), filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
  /s/ Robert G. Costantini

Robert G. CostantiniExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### MARTIN v. FISCHBACH TRUCKING CO.

Civ. A. No. 8270.

United States District Court D. Massachusetts.

Oct. 11, 1949.

*603Harry Zarrow, Worcester, Mass., for plaintiff.

Michael T. Prendergast, Boston, Mass., for defendant.

SWEENEY, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff, a resident of Connecticut, sues defendant, an Ohio corporation, in this District for injuries received in a collision with a motor vehicle driven by defendant’s agent on the public ways of Massachusetts. Plaintiff obtained service upon defendant by registered mail, and by serving the Massachusetts Registrar of Motor Vehicles in accordance with c. 90, sec. 3B, Mass.Gen.Laws, Ter.Ed., which provides that by service upon the Registrar any motorist or his agent using the highways of Massachusetts shall be amenable to “all lawful processes in any action or proceeding against him” arising out of collision with his vehicle. Defendant filed a special appearance and a motion to dismiss the action on the ground that it (the defendant) “is not subject to service of process within the District of Massachusetts”.

There can be no question that defendant was properly served. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure No. 4(d) (3), (7), 28 U.S.C.A., provides that service of summons and complaint for the Federal district courts shall be made upon any foreign corporation in the manner prescribed by the law of the state in which the service is made. O’Donnell v. Slade, D.C., 5 F.Supp. 265; McLean v. State of Mississippi, 5 Cir., 96 F.2d 741, 119 A.L.R. 670. However, defendant’s motion can be construed as objecting to improper venue, and in this regard it is well founded. Inasmuch as plaintiff is not a resident of this judicial district, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1391, requires that defendant be doing business in Massachusetts, be licensed to do business within Massachusetts, subsection (c), or be a resident of Massachusetts, subsection (a). From the fact that plaintiff’s agent drove a motor vehicle on the highways of this state it cannot be concluded that plaintiff was doing business here. Nor does it follow that defendant is licensed to do business here because it is amenable to process under a Motorist’s Financial Responsibility Statute. De Laet v. Seltzer, D.C., 1 F.Supp. 1022, decided that the applicability of such a statute to defendant does not make it a “resident” of Massachusetts within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1391(a).

Jurisdiction will be retained for ten days to enable plaintiff to request any transfer of venue warranted by 28 U.S.C.A. § 1406, at the end of which period and failing such request the complaint will be dismissed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 22, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 22, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0480. JOANNE EDWARDS v. ALBANY AREA COMMUNITY SERVICE BOARD

et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

15CV794
# table55_q7_naics