alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 911 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 27, 2020. 

Resolved, That House Resolution 891, agreed to March 

11, 2020 (as amended by House Resolution 905, agreed to 

March 19, 2020), is amended— 

(1) in section 7, by striking ‘‘March 29, 2020’’ and 

inserting ‘‘April 19, 2020’’; 

(2) in section 10, by striking ‘‘March 29, 2020’’ 

and inserting ‘‘April 19, 2020’’; and 

(3) in section 11, by striking ‘‘March 30, 2020’’ 

and inserting ‘‘April 20, 2020’’. 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R. 748) to 

amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on high cost employer-sponsored health coverage, 

with the Senate amendment thereto, and to consider in the 

House, without intervention of any point of order, a motion 

offered by the Majority Leader or his designee that the 

House concur in the Senate amendment. The Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion 
2 

•HRES 911 EH 

shall be debatable for three hours equally divided and controlled by the Majority Leader and the Minority Leader or 

their respective designees. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to its adoption without intervening motion. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 804 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 804

    Recognizing the leading role of Utahns in the fight for women's 
  suffrage and celebrating the sesquicentennial of the first votes by 
    women under the equal suffrage law of Utah on February 14, 1870.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2020

   Mr. Bishop of Utah (for himself, Mr. Stewart, Mr. Curtis, and Mr. 
McAdams) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Recognizing the leading role of Utahns in the fight for women's 
  suffrage and celebrating the sesquicentennial of the first votes by 
    women under the equal suffrage law of Utah on February 14, 1870.

Whereas, on February 10, 1870, the territorial legislature of Utah passed an Act 
        granting women the right to vote, which was signed into law on February 
        12, 1870, by Acting Governor Stephen Mann;
Whereas, on February 14, 1870, women voted in the Salt Lake City election, 
        becoming the first women to vote under an equal suffrage law within what 
        is now the United States;
Whereas, in 1887, Congress revoked the voting rights of women in Utah;
Whereas, on November 5, 1895, the new Utah Constitution was adopted with a 
        provision stating, ``The rights of citizens of the State of Utah to vote 
        and hold office shall not be denied or abridged on account of sex. Both 
        male and female citizens of this State shall enjoy equally all civil, 
        political and religious rights and privileges.'';
Whereas, on November 3, 1896, Martha Maria Hughes Cannon, who will be honored by 
        a statue in the United States Capitol in 2020, was elected to the Utah 
        State Senate and became the first woman to serve as a State senator in 
        the United States; and
Whereas, in 1919, women's suffrage was extended to all United States citizens 
        with the adoption of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution of the 
        United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the leading role of Utahns in the fight for 
        women's suffrage and the adoption of the 19th Amendment to the 
        Constitution of the United States guaranteeing that the ``right 
        of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or 
        abridged by the United States or by any State on account of 
        sex''; and
            (2) celebrates the sesquicentennial of the first votes by 
        women under the equal suffrage law of Utah on February 14, 
        1870.
                                 <all>
```
DM1\2410194.1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

JEFFREY M. MULLER; et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

THE HON. PHILIP J. MAENZA,et al., 

 Defendants. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

: 

:

: 

:

No. 2:10-CV-6110 (WHW) (CCC) 

PLAINTIFF SECOND AMENDMENT 

FOUNDATION, INC.’S DISCLOSURE 

PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 7.1

Plaintiff Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., by its attorneys Duane Morris LLP, 

discloses pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that it has no parent 

company and that no publicly traded company owns 10% or more of its shares. 

Dated: November 30, 2010 

 Newark, New Jersey 

Respectfully submitted, 

DUANE MORRIS LLP

A Delaware Limited Liability Partnership 

 By: 

 David D. Jensen, Esq. 

Robert P. Firriolo, Esq. 

744 Broad Street, Suite 1200 

Newark, New Jersey 07102-3889 

973.424.2000 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Case 2:10-cv-06110-WHW -CCC Document 3 Filed 11/30/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 23
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - December 2008 

Benefit payments December 2008 December 2007 

Regular Retirement 

and Survivor Benefits 

Total 

Retired employ

Spouses and d

Widow(er)s - a

Other survivors 

ees 

ivorced spouses 

ged and disabled 

23,019,000 

102,670,000 

156,634,000 

$840,477,000 

558,151,000 

22,659,000 

98,668,000 

156,710,000 

$818,116,000 

540,053,000 

Average under 

Being paid Awarded in Social Security 

Monthly benefits end of month month December 2008 

Number Average1 Number Average1 Being Paid Awarded 

Total 565,200 ......... 2,000 ......... ......... .........

Regular employee annuities, total 275,100 $2,110 700 $2,496 ......... .........

 Age 191,100 2,082 2 300 2 3,270 $1,153 3 $1,547

 Disability, Full Retirement Age and Over 34,200 1,876 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Disability, Under Full Retirement Age 49,900 2,378 300 2,231 1,063 1,113 

Spouses and divorced spouses 136,600 779 700 956 551 392 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 127,700 1,259 400 1,630 1,090 879 

Widowed mothers and fathers 800 1,553 4/ 1,540 835 814 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 14,100 857 4/ 881 5/ 5/ 

Children 10,700 928 4/ 1,160 745 770 

Other survivors 100 511 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Benefit payments 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

December 

2008 

$4,969,000 

December 

2007 

$5,040,000 

Number 

121,000 

Average 

$42 300 

Number

$41 

Average 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement. 

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 35); about 200

 other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis. 

4

Fewer than 50. 

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers. 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. 

Regular retirement and survivor benefit payments total includes hospital insurance benefits for services in Canada. 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

December 2008 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Average payment 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period

 Per

 full week 

Unemployment 4,600 $516 $302 

Sickness 5,400 

December 2008 

547 302 

Benefit payments 

December 2007 

Unemployment

Total 

4,501,000 

$8,442,000 $7,425,000 

3,526,000 

Sickness 3,941,000 3,899,000

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited). Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary 

Recycled

 Paper
,M COURT OF APPEALS

2015

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

FILE'COPY

7/23/2015

Green, Willis Henry Tr. Ct. No. 18971

COANo. 12-13-00391-CR

PD-0395-15

Pursuant to Rule 69.4(a) T.R.A.P., the record is returned to the court of appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CATHY LUSK

1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354

TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL*
FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 7/23/2015 3:12:18 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

Please note that the time for the Federal Communications Commission Open Meeting is rescheduled from 10 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. 

The Meeting will include a presentation on the status of the Commission's process for developing a National Broadband Plan and a presentation on the Digital Television transition. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-15922 Filed 7-1-09; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

                    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at                     *www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​*.                

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 17, 2009.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco**                     (Kenneth Binning, Vice President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:                

*1. Chinatrust Capital Corporation*, Torrance, California, and Chinatrust Financial Holding Company, Ltd., and Chinatrust Commercial Bank, Ltd., both of Taipei, Taiwan; to engage directly in extending credit and servicing loans pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 29, 2009.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E9-15616 Filed 7-1-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | • | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | • | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Partnership. |
|--|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |                                                                                                                                                                                                             |              |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|
| Date: November 14, 2007 | By:                                                                                                                                                                                                    | s/ JOHN B. WALKER |
|                    | John B. Walker                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|                    | Chief                            Executive Officer of EV Management LLC, general                            partner of EV Energy GP, L.P.,general                            partner of EV Energy Partners, L.P. |
Exhibit 23


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-306-04) pertaining to the Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan for
Directors and the Stock Incentive Plan of the Franklin Holding Corporation of
our report dated March 7, 2003, with respect to the financial statements and
financial highlights of Franklin Capital Corporation (formerly The Franklin
Holding Corporation) included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2002.


                                                    ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, New York
March 31, 2003
48 Occupational Outlook Quarterly ● Winter 2002-03

ho regularly works at home?

And who gets paid for it?

According to the Bureau of Labor

Statistics (BLS), those in professional

specialty occupations were most likely

to work at home at least once per week

in May 2001. But most were not paid

for this work. Workers either in executive, administrative, and managerial

occupations or in sales occupations

were most likely to do work at home

that is compensated.

The data are from a supplement to

the May 2001 Current Population

Survey. As the chart indicates, workers

in some nonfarm occupational groups

were more likely than others to work at

home regularly. Persons who usually

work at home at least once a week

6 4 24

8 4 13

8 4 8

5 1 1

1 3 3

2 2 3

3 1 1

1

Professional specialty

Executive, administrative, and managerial

Sales occupations

Precision production, craft, and repair

Technicians and related support

Administrative support, including clerical

Operators, fabricators, and laborers

Service occupations

(Percent)

1 Self employed Wage and salary, unpaid Wage and salary, paid

made up about one-third of all workers

in professional specialty occupations;

about one-fourth of those in executive,

administrative, and managerial positions; and about one-fifth of those in

sales jobs. In other occupational

groups, the proportion who regularly

worked at home ranged from about 5 to

7 percent, but more than half in these

groups were compensated for their

home work.

About 20 million self-employed and

wage-and-salary workers usually

worked at home at least once a week as

part of their primary job. Home

workers were about 15 percent of all

workers aged 16 and older. But just

under half of those, about 7 percent,

received compensation for that work,

either because they were self employed

or because they had a special arrangement with their employer to be paid for

working at home. “Unpaid” workers

did not necessarily get nothing for the

work they did at home; many are paid

for their work at home through their

regular salary, although they are not

paid specifically for the home-based

portion of their work.

To find out which occupations were

most likely to involve work at home,

see “Work at home” in the OOQ’s Grab

Bag for fall 2002. Or, get even more

detail from a summary of the survey

supplement, available online at

www.bls.gov/cps or by calling (202)

691-6378.

Persons who usually worked at home at least

once a week, by nonfarm occupational group, May 2001

Source: Current Population Survey (CPS), May 2001 supplement.

Note: CPS occupational titles do not conform to the 2000 Standard Occupational Classification Manual.

W
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 96 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Black History Month and honoring the 

outstanding contributions of African-American Congressional Medal of 

Honor recipients. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2019 

Mrs. BEATTY (for herself, Mr. BROWN of Maryland, Ms. CLARKE of New 

York, Mr. COHEN, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. FUDGE, Ms. 

JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. RUSH, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. SOTO, Mr. TAKANO, 

Mr. VELA, Mrs. LURIA, and Mr. YARMUTH) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Black History Month 

and honoring the outstanding contributions of AfricanAmerican Congressional Medal of Honor recipients. 

Whereas the Congressional Medal of Honor is the highest 

award for personal acts of valor in action above and beyond the call of duty against an enemy force which can 

be bestowed upon an individual serving in the United 

States Armed Forces; 

Whereas, since its first presentation in 1863, 3,515 members 

of the Armed Forces have received the Congressional 

Medal of Honor with just less than half being awarded 

for actions during the Civil War; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 96 IH 

Whereas African-American members of the Armed Forces 

have played vital roles in military operations throughout 

the history of the United States; 

Whereas 88 African Americans have been awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor for military valor; 

Whereas Sergeant William Harvey Carney, a member of 

Company C of the 54th Massachusetts Colored Infantry, 

was the first African American to earn the Congressional 

Medal of Honor when, during the attack on Fort Wagner 

on July 18, 1863, he risked his own life above and beyond the call of duty to save the American flag while 

under heavy fire and prevent its capture, despite being 

wounded several times by Confederate fire; 

Whereas William Harvey Carney was not presented with the 

Congressional Medal of Honor until nearly 37 years after 

his acts of bravery; 

Whereas, in 1993, a study commissioned by the United 

States Army described systematic racial discrimination in 

the criteria for awarding medals during World War II; 

Whereas after an exhaustive review, the study recommended 

seven African-American World War II veterans be awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor; and 

Whereas African-American men and women who today serve 

in the Armed Forces play a critical role in the defense 

and security of the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes Black History Month as an im3 portant time to acknowledge and reflect on the sig4 nificant contributions of African Americans in the 

5 history of the United States; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 96 IH 

1 (2) honors the outstanding contributions of Af2 rican-American members of the United States 

3 Armed Forces, including the 88 African Americans 

4 who have been awarded the Congressional Medal of 

5 Honor for military bravery, heroism, and valor. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### Thomas Stephanos VISIKIDES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 12-7429.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 12, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 14, 2012.

Thomas Stephanos Visikides, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Stallard, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*299PER CURIAM:

Thomas Stephanos Visikides seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Visikides has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*