alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


          We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13093, File No. 33-60326, File No. 33-69708
and File No. 33-97376) of Nu-kote Holdings, Inc. of our report dated January 7,
2000, related to the consolidated balance sheet of Nu-kote Holdings, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 1999 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in shareholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive income
(loss) and cash flows for the year then ended and our report on the related
financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the March 31, 1999, annual
report on Form 10-K of Nu-kote Holdings, Inc.

          The audit report on the consolidated financial statements of Nu-kote
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries referred to above contains an explanatory
paragraph that states the consolidated financial statements do not purport to
reflect or provide for the consequences of the Company's filing for
reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and the bankruptcy
proceedings. The above referenced audit report on the consolidated financial
statements of the Company also contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company's recurring losses from operations, material uncertainties
related to pending litigation and other claims and shareholders' deficit raise
substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern.
The financial statement schedule referred to above does not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of the bankruptcy proceedings
and the uncertainty relating to the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern.

          Our report to the consolidated financial statements of the Company
refers to a change to the first-in, first-out method of valuing inventory.



                                             KPMG LLP



Nashville, Tennessee
April 19, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 127 (Monday, July 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31910-31911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15711]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Supplemental Watershed Plan No. 1 and Environmental Assessment 
for Big Slough Watershed, Clay County, AR

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969; the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations 
(40 CFR Part 1500); and the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
Regulations (7 CFR Part 650); the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, gives notice that an 
environmental impact statement is not being prepared for the Big Slough 
Watershed Supplement No.1, Clay County, Arkansas.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Kalven L. Trice, State 
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Rm 3416 
Federal Building, 700 West Capital Avenue, Little Rock, AR 72201-3225, 
Telephone (501) 301-3121.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental assessment of this 
federally assisted action indicates that the project will not cause 
significant local, regional, or national impacts on the environment. As 
a result of these findings, Kalven L. Trice, State Conservationist, has 
determined that the preparation and review of an environmental impact 
statement is not needed for this project.
    This project will allow the installation of seven floodwater 
retarding structures (FWRS Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, and 11) to be 
constructed and will provide storage for flood prevention and 100-year 
sediment storage. All seven structures will be designed and constructed 
as high hazard dams, capable of safely storing and discharging the 
runoff from the Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) storm without 
overtopping the dams.
    Federal assistance will be provided under the authority of the 
Flood Prevention Program authorized by the Watershed Protection and 
Flood Prevention Act (Pub. L. 83-566), as amended.
    The notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) has been 
forwarded to the Environmental Protection Agency and to various 
Federal, State, and local agencies and interested parties. A limited 
number of copies of the FONSI are available to fill

[[Page 31911]]

single copy requests at the above address. Basic data developed during 
the environmental assessment are on file and may be reviewed by 
contacting Kalven L. Trice, State Conservationist.
    No administrative action on implementation of the proposal will be 
taken until 30 days after the date of this publication in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: June 22, 2009.
Kalven L. Trice,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. E9-15711 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 127 (Monday, July 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 32010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15817]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11802 and <greek-i>11803]


Missouri Disaster <greek-i> MO-00038

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Missouri (FEMA-
1847-DR), dated 06/19/2009.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Tornadoes, and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 05/08/2009 through 05/16/2009.

DATES:  Effective Date: 06/19/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 08/18/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/17/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 06/19/2009, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Adair, Barton, Bollinger, Camden, Cape Girardeau, 
Cedar, Crawford, Dade, Dallas, Dent, Douglas, Greene, Grundy, Hickory, 
Howell, Iron, Jasper, Knox, Laclede, Lewis, Livingston, Madison, 
Maries, Marion, Miller, Newton, Oregon, Ozark, Perry, Phelps, Polk, 
Pulaski, Ray, Reynolds, Ripley, Saint Francois, Sainte Genevieve, 
Saline, Shannon, Shelby, Stone, Sullivan, Texas, Vernon, Washington, 
Wayne, Webster, Wright.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit             4.500
 Available Elsewhere;........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11802B 
and for economic injury is 11803B.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-15817 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### SHULTZ et al. v. MANUFACTURERS & TRADERS TRUST CO. et al. (two cases).

Eq. No. 2279, Civ. No. 182.

District Court, W. D. New York.

March 13, 1940.

Jules C. Randal, of Buffalo, N. Y., for plaintiffs.

Babcock, Hollister, Newbury & Russ, of Buffalo, N. Y., for Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. a-nd others.

Rarm, Brown, Sturtevant & Kelly, of Buffalo, N. Y., fo-r defendant Chisholm and others.

Dudley, Stowe & Sawyer, of Buffalo, N. Y., for defendant Sawyer.

Larkin, Rathbone & Perry, of New York City, for defendants Eastman and others.

BURKE, District Judge.

The plaintiffs have moved pursuant to Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for an order requiring the defendant Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company to produce and permit the inspection of the minutes of the meetings of its Board of Directors and its executive committee for the months of July through December, 1928 together with all papers referred to therein, also all pages of said defendant’s books of account reflecting extension of credit to any of the defendants to this suit and to numerous other persons not defendants.

The plaintiff is entitled to an inspection of such minutes of the meetings of the Board of Directors and of the executive committee during the months of July through December, 1928, together with all papers therein referred to, that contain any resolution, discussion or reference to the matter of the purchase of, or to the matter of formation, participation in, or financing of a syndicate for the purchase of the Stock of Houde Engineering Corporation, or a loan to Frederick B. Cooley, or New York Car Wheel Company made on or about October 24, 1928, except such of said records as have been submitted to the Court in support of the pending motion for summary judgment. The defendant is also entitled to inspect such portions of the books of account that contain any record of or reference to the matters above referred to. The order may provide for such inspection at the offices of the bank after banking hours at a time to be agreed upon or fixed by the Court. Otherwise the motion is denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IGNACIO GONZALEZ QUINONEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-74022

Agency No. A090-054-039

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 8, 2015** 

Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, PAEZ, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Ignacio Gonzalez Quinonez petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’s (BIA) decision finding him removable for having been convicted of two

crimes involving moral turpitude (CIMTs), 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(ii), and an

aggravated felony, 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii); 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F), and

FILED

JUL 24 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
pretermitting his applications for cancellation of removal, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a), and

under former section 212(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c). We deny the petition.

1. As the government concedes, the BIA’s pretermission of 212(c) relief

based on the lack of a “statutory counterpart in the grounds of inadmissability” was

erroneous. See Judulang v. Holder, 132 S. Ct. 476 (2011).

2. Remand would be futile. Gonzalez admitted that he had been convicted

in 2009 for a violation of California Penal Code § 422 and in 2011 for a violation

of California Penal Code § 647(b). The Immigration Judge (IJ) found the

convictions established by clear and convincing evidence, and Gonzalez did not

challenge that conclusion before the BIA.

We have held that convictions under both statutes are categorically CIMTs. 

See Rohit v. Holder, 670 F.3d 1085 (9th Cir. 2012); Latter-Singh v. Holder, 668

F.3d 1156 (9th Cir. 2012). Therefore, even without relying on the 1993 conviction

at all, Gonzalez is removable for having committed two CIMTs.

Gonzalez is ineligible for relief from that ground of removability. First,

because both convictions were entered after April 1, 1997, even if Gonzalez were

granted 212(c) relief, it would not waive this ground of removability. Matter of

Abdelghany, 26 I. & N. Dec. 254, 261 (BIA 2014). Second, Gonzalez is ineligible

for cancellation, both because he was previously convicted of an aggravated

2
felony, see Becker v. Gonzales, 473 F.3d 1000, 1003-04 (9th Cir. 2007), and

because, in order to avoid being separately removable for the aggravated felony, he

would need to obtain 212(c) relief, which would foreclose also seeking

cancellation, see Garcia-Jimenez v. Gonzales, 488 F.3d 1082, 1085-86 (9th Cir.

2007).

Neither the IJ nor the BIA held that the 2011 conviction was a CIMT. No

remand is necessary, however, because that question has been settled by Rohit. See

Medina-Lara v. Holder, 771 F.3d 1106, 1117 (9th Cir. 2014).

PETITION DENIED.

3
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Dr. Barry W. Karlin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CRC Health Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Date: November 15, 2010             
|                                    
|/S/    DR. BARRY W.
KARLIN          
|Dr. Barry W. Karlin                 
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CRC Health Corporation and will be retained by CRC Health Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Jerome B. Eisenberg, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ORBCOMM Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 14, 2007         /s/ Jerome B. Eisenberg  Name:  Jerome B. Eisenberg   Title:  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice 133425 & (61) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman,
Justices v SC: 133425 COA: 261408 Wayne CC: 04-011607-02 MARCOS RAMIREZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 23, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for
remand is DENIED.

s0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00551-CV

Pablo SOLIZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Brooks County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-02-16542-CV

Honorable David Wellington Chew, Judge Presiding1

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

It is ORDERED that no costs shall be assessed against appellant, Pablo Soliz, because he 

is indigent. 

SIGNED July 22, 2015.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

 1 Sitting by assignment
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report of All American Pet Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Barry Schwartz,
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.          The Report fully complies with the
                                                           requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                                                           of 1934; and



2.          The information contained in the Report
                                                           fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                                                           and results of operations of the Company.



| | Date: November 14,
2012                    
| | -------------------------------------------
| |                                            
| | /S/ Barry Schwartz                         
| | Barry Schwartz                             
| | CEO and                                    
| | Principal Financial and 
Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6303

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

BILLY R. MCCULLERS, JR.,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief

District Judge. (4:07-cr-00049-RBS-JEB-1)

Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: July 27, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy R. McCullers, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Elaine O’Boyle, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Howard Jacob 

Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Billy R. McCullers, Jr., appeals the district court’s order 

granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion.* We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States 

v. McCullers, No. 4:07-cr-00049-RBS-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 

2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * Although the district court granted McCullers’s § 3582 

motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce 

McCuller’s sentence to the full extent he requests.
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/  John      H. Short |
|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   | John      H. Short                |
|   | President      and                |
|   | Chief      Executive Officer      |
|   | RehabCare      Group, Inc.        |
|   | March      8, 2010                |