alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Hon. Dennis M. Cavanaugh
v. : 10 Cr. 851 (DMC)
STEPHEN DEPIRO, et al. : ORDER

This matter having been found by the Court to be a complex case pursuant to Title 18,
United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii); and the Court having found that an order granting a
further continuance of the proceedings in the above-captioned matter should be entered, and for
good and sufficient cause shown;

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that the action should be continued for the
following reasons:

1. The government has filed a second superseding indictment in this matter, expanding
the allegations of racketeering that occurred over several decades and containing new charges.

2. The defendants and their counsel need time to review the discovery in this matter
and to investigate the charges, including new charges included in the second superseding
indictment.

3. In light of the discovery and depending on the results of their respective
investigations, each defendant will need time to determine whether to file motions in this matter
and which motions should be filed.

4. In light of these findings, and given the nature of the case and its complexity, it is
unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings or the trial itself within the
time limits established under the Speedy Trial Act.

5. The grant of a further continuance will enable counsel for the defendants to

1


adequately review the discovery, prepare motions and proceed with trial.

6. Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7), the ends of justice
served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in
a speedy trial.

7. All defendants have consented to a further continuance of this matter.

WHEREFORE, it is on this A day of December, 2011;

ORDERED that the proceedings in this matter are continued from January 2, 2012 until
April 2, 2012;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period from January 2, 2012 until April 2, 2012,
shall be excludable in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a schedule of proceedings in this matter shall be set.

FION. DENNIS M. CAVAN, _
United States District Jud;
TDCJ Offender Details Page 1 of 2

72,44 I-0oS

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE —Qy Sear

Offender Information Details

SID Number: 02868435
TDCJ Number: 01477843
Name: BUGGS,STEPHEN
Race: B

Gender: M

DOB: 1964-05-01
Maximum Sentence Date: 2081-03-07
Current Facility: COFFIELD
Projected Release Date: 2066-03-08
Parole Eligibility Date: 2036-03-07
Offender Visitation Eligible: YES

Information provided is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times per day
on visitation days. Because this information is subject to change, family members and
friends are encouraged to call the unit prior to traveling for a visit.

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE:

Scheduled Release Date: Offender is not scheduled for release at this time.
Scheduled Release Type: Will be determined when release date is scheduled.
Scheduled Release Location: Will be determined when release date is scheduled.

Parole Review Information

Offense History:
Offense Sentence Sentence (YY-
Date Offense Date County Case No. MM-DD)
T T T I I °

http://offender.tdcj.texas.gov/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=02868435 7/27/2015
NO. 03-/3-00ZOZ'OL

xw rne

COURT Of CMMIML AMBUS fUgg^gi gf

MIL WW!

lAMAcosta,Cteft

mom fimpiL w- oz-n-ooytz-CA. FJLED (

rmyfzs coumy

JUL 27 2015 '

FrK5Ttf0rwMMleXTeWSWM0rTm£7Oftt-£ AbelAcosta Ci rk

TCTHeHOWR.fieie ja&ttO^rmw&r or Ci&mN»t-.-APP&&5s

combs uqWj MAto&GMezjF&rjrTjoh/efiLsAAso-FZLes rms Mortal rod

AA/&awifrzaN or szxry i(od) ows ta/ wtizcu tom#/t PerxrroM-roRi -

oi:scK£Tjz?A/fiRy-^Vxeu. ta/ suPt&HTdF this MarzoM//9f>/?&X,flA/r

%tfOW§TH6 COURT THE-FQLbOwZA/<k'

•X

TUB perxTTONefi *//?s c#A/VtCT(?bxh/TH<? Wl^ Qi^&ct CouKr

€mse'Aj0.03-J3-0o3O2r£lL,3>TyLJ5o Srmeofrexns vsmmzxo

(&/yieZ. Tli? PtTXTWUBfL #P/>£#L£C> Tip TH? COUZTOF #Ff£nLSy Zed

Sty&eMe ji4DTCzai~ dtstkxct. me~C/is£. *"is ^rrxuMep ok/ jiamg

ii/2015. 3T

tu& PRmetJr DertDLTA/e- -rott frcr/vc* rue reriTzoN w& DxscRer&?wfi&

Beisre*/ rs, J(AL.y tOj zors,• thc pctxtx^/v&r. rxMe^y piWo a motson

. ro/i. k£Hetuuifi/<hQN'-exreA/rxoN orrx^te oaj jam /%zeis /tA/o tf/?s_

a/ot Kecem/F/i <ze%f&M$e. rue PerrxzeNeiL h&s a/ot Re&uesreD tw/

exreA/SWA/ fQR. ft "PtD. RXKfRXQK TO THTS RE&uesr.

F£rrrX0N££S zmuezT WR. Aft/ &TE3WMXS BnseD iAPOh/THefOLWk/ZMj

fkcrt: PerzTJomR was a/ot TA/raR.i^eo of r^eoecrsr^A/ orrtie

Oaa/er ofArrests xas /3ffx&mxa/c7 //rs &7$euivtzl b-fi-i*?.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1027 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1027

 To clarify the status of the North Country, Ice Age, and New England 
 National Scenic Trails as units of the National Park System, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 4, 2019

Ms. Baldwin (for herself, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Markey, Mr. 
Murphy, and Ms. Stabenow) introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the status of the North Country, Ice Age, and New England 
 National Scenic Trails as units of the National Park System, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Scenic Trails Parity Act''.

SEC. 2. NORTH COUNTRY NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a)(8) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(8)) is amended in the third sentence by inserting ``as a unit 
of the National Park System'' before the period at the end.

SEC. 3. ICE AGE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a)(10) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(10)) is amended by striking the third and fourth sentences and 
inserting ``The trail shall be administered by the Secretary of the 
Interior as a unit of the National Park System.''.

SEC. 4. NEW ENGLAND NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a)(28) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(28)) is amended in the third sentence by inserting ``as a unit 
of the National Park System,'' after ``administer the trail''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Fred A. Brasch, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report
on Form 10Q of Middle Kingdom Alliance Corp. for the three month period ending March 31, 2007.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 14, 2007



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       |  | /s/ Fred A. Brasch     
|Name:  |  | Fred A. Brasch         
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

This Certificate is being delivered
pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.

The undersigned, who are the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Omni Financial Services, Inc. (the issuer), hereby certify as follows:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10Q of the issuer (the Report), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

Dated this 14th day of August, 2007.



/s/ Stephen M. KleinStephen M. Klein,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Constance E. PerrineConstance E. Perrine,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION EN BANC

Appellate case name: Javier Noel Campos v. The State of Texas

Appellate case numbers: 01-13-00415-CR, 01-13-00416-CR, 01-13-00417-CR

Trial court case numbers: 1328806, 1328807, 1308988

Trial court: 184th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: February 2, 2015

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for reconsideration en banc is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes 

 Acting Individually Acting for the Court

En Banc Court consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, 

Massengale, Brown, Huddle, and Lloyd

Date: February 19, 2015
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-1173

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Jeffery Thompson

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City

____________

 Submitted: July 7, 2015

Filed: July 22, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Jeffery Thompson directly appeals the district court’s judgment, entered after 1

a jury found him guilty of cocaine base conspiracy and distribution offenses. In a 

The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the

1

Northern District of Iowa.
brief filed under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel questions

whether enforcement of an appeal waiver, entered pursuant to a sentencing

agreement, would constitute a miscarriage of justice. In a pro se supplemental brief,

Thompson argues the indictment was defective because it omitted the word

“intentionally.” 

In conformity with the parties’ stipulations in a written sentencing agreement,

the district court sentenced Thompson to concurrent terms of 324 months in prison,

and supervised release totaling 10 years. As part of that agreement, in exchange for

the government’s withdrawal of an amended 21 U.S.C. § 851 information, which

would have resulted in a mandatory life sentence, Thompson agreed to waive his right

to appeal or collaterally challenge his conviction and sentence on any grounds except

(1) a sentence imposed contrary to the sentencing agreement, (2) a sentence

exceeding the statutory maximum, or (3) a constitutionally defective sentence, but he

retained the right to assert claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Thompson

initialed every paragraph, and confirmed in writing and at the sentencing hearing that

he was knowingly and voluntarily waiving his rights, after conferring with counsel,

in order to induce the government to accept the sentencing stipulations. 

Because the record demonstrates that Thompson acted knowingly and

voluntarily, and that no miscarriage ofjustice would result, we enforce the sentencing

agreement’s appeal waiver. See United States v. Cheney, 571 F.3d 764, 766 (8th Cir.

2009); see also United States v. Walters, 732 F.3d 489, 491 (5th Cir. 2013), cert.

denied, 134 S. Ct. 1349 (2014). 

An independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

80 (1988), reveals no nonfrivolous issue outside the scope of the appeal waiver. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is

granted.

______________________________

-2-
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Susser Holdings Corporation (the Company) for the three months ended October 3, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sam L. Susser, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 12, 2010



/s/ Sam L. SusserSam L. SusserPresident and Chief Executive Officer


This
certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

ROBERT M. BOARDMAN,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 92 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6561

VINCENT LEE EDWARDS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WENDELL W. PIXLEY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District 

Judge. (1:14-cv-00171-GBL-IDD)

Submitted: July 21, 2015 Decided: July 24, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent Lee Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Beatty Martin, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Vincent Lee Edwards seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Edwards has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

                 NATIONAL SECURITIES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

                          COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                      PRIMARY


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             SEPTEMBER 27,        September 29,       September 30,
                                                                  1996                 1995               1994              
                                                            -----------------   -----------------   ------------------
<S>                                              <C>                            <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Net income for primary earnings
   per share                                                $       1,735,000   $         257,000   $         510,000
                                                            =================   =================   =================

Weighted average number of
   common shares outstanding
   during the year                                                    767,638             667,875             661,496

Add common equivalent shares
   upon exercise of stock options                                     94,415               33,432              26,923
                                                            ----------------    -----------------   -----------------

Weighted average number of
   shares used in calculation
   of primary earnings per share                                      862,053             701,307             688,419
                                                            =================   =================   =================

Primary earnings per share                                  $            2.01   $             .37   $             .74
                                                            =================   =================   =================

                                                 FULLY-DILUTED

Weighted average number of
   shares used in calculating
   primary earnings per share                                         862,053             701,307             688,419

Add additional shares issuable
   upon exercise of stock options                                     172,097               *                    *   
                                                            -----------------   -----------------   -----------------

Weighted average number of
   shares used in calculation
   of fully-diluted earnings per share                              1,034,150             701,307             688,419
                                                            =================   =================   =================

Fully-diluted earnings per share                            $            1.68   $             .37   $             .74
                                                            =================   =================   =================
</TABLE>


*No effect given to common stock equivalents, as their effect would increase
the income per share.





                                     -39-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         437,768
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,466,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,883,813
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,883,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          293,160
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,590,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,883,813
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               196,526
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                129,556
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            129,556
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   129,556
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.09
        

</TABLE>