alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

DAVID CASTRO CONNOLLY,

Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action No. 10-6819 (SRC)

OPINION & ORDER

CHESLER, District Judge

This matter comes before the Court upon Pro se Petitioner David Castro Connolly’s 

motion for reconsideration of this Court’s Opinion and Order entered August 29, 2011, granting

in part and denying in part Petitioner’s motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be denied.

“A court may grant a motion for reconsideration if the moving party shows one of the

following: (1) an intervening change in the controlling law; (2) the availability of new evidence

that was not available when the court issued its order; or (3) the need to correct a clear error of

law or fact or to prevent manifest injustice.” See Banda v. Burlington County, 263 Fed. Appx.

182, 183 (3d Cir. 2008) (citing Max’s Seafood Café v. Quinteros, 176 F.3d 669, 677 (3d Cir.

1999)); L. CIV. R. 7.1(i). Petitioner has failed to demonstrate an entitlement to reconsideration

under any of these three prongs. Rather, Petitioner has largely repeated the arguments he

originally made in support of his motion to vacate.

For these reasons,

Case 2:10-cv-06819-SRC Document 35 Filed 12/30/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 270
IT IS on this 30th day of December, 2011

ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration (Docket Entry No. 28) of this

Court’s Opinion and Order of August 29, 2011 is DENIED.

 s/ Stanley R. Chesler 

 STANLEY R. CHESLER

United States District Judge

2

Case 2:10-cv-06819-SRC Document 35 Filed 12/30/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 271
|   | • | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | • | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Partnership. |
|--------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|       Date: May 10, 2010 | /s/MICHAEL      E. MERCER                                                                                                                    |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                   | Michael      E. Mercer                                                                                                                       |   |
|                                                   | Chief      Financial Officer of EV Management LLC,general      partner of EV Energy GP, L.P.,general      partner of EV Energy Partners,L.P. |

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-20483

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FAYEZ AL-JABRI, also known as Frank Al-Jabri,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-514

Before ELROD, SOUTHWICK, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Fayez Al-Jabri has moved for leave 

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). AlJabri has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 24, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-20483 Document: 00513128623 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/24/2015
No. 14-20483

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-20483 Document: 00513128623 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/24/2015
#### In re: Steven THOMPSON; Aster Kifle-Thompson, Debtors. Steven Thompson; Aster Kifle-Thompson, Appellants, v. Monterey Mushrooms, Inc., Appellee.

No. 09-60037.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.*

Filed March 7, 2011.

Steven Thompson, Henderson, NV, pro se.

Aster Kifle Thompson, Henderson, NV, pro se.

Matthew J. Aulenta, Esquire, Alan Joseph Smith, Grunsky, Ebey, Farrar and Howell, Watsonville, CA, for Appellee.

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Steven Thompson and Aster Kifle-Thompson (“debtors”) appeal pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s summary judgment in an adversary proceeding determining that a California state court judgment was a nondischargeable debt. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo, *Baldwin v. Kilpatrick (In re Baldwin),*249 F.3d 912, 916-17 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm.

The bankruptcy court properly determined that the debt was nondischargeable based on the Monterey County Superior Court’s findings of fact. *See*11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), (a)(6) (debts obtained either under “false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud” or “for willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity” are nondischargeable); *In re Baldwin,*249 F.3d at 917-20 (concluding that, in an adversary proceeding concerning dis-chargeability, the bankruptcy court properly gave preclusive effect to an issue decided in a state court action). We are not persuaded by debtors’ contentions concerning the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board and Board of Chiropractic Examiners.

We do not consider debtors’ contention concerning the alleged bias of the superior court judge because it was raised for the first time on appeal and its consideration is not “necessary to prevent manifest injustice.” *See Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. ConocoPhillips Co.,*546 F.3d 1142, 1146 (9th Cir.2008).

*644Debtors’ remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

Appellees’ unopposed request for judicial notice is granted.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
d&ttfaA

/Ufa*, && &'/

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUL 20 2015

Abeltosfa,Clerk

A%U&&,//c/Jha**/k6

/jb7/rfyj&z
PRICE, MEESE, SHULMAN & D'ARMINIO, PC 

Mack-Cali Corporate Center 

50 Tice Boulevard 

Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677 

Telephone: (201) 391-3737 

E-Mail: dkowal@pricemeese.com

Attorneys for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

LUANN DUNKINSON, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITIGROUP INC. (d/b/a) THD/CITIBANK 

USA, EXPERIAN, TRANSUNION, 

OXFORD COLLECTION AGENCY, INC. 

d/b/a OXFORD MANAGEMENT 

SERVICES, ANTONIO LAMEIRAS, 

 

 Defendants. 

Civil No. 10-cv-6489(FLW)(LHG) 

EXPERIAN INFORMAITON 

SOLUTIONS, INC.’S 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE 

STATEMENT 

 Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”) submits the following 

Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to Fed.R.Civ. P. 7.1(a): 

 Experian is a non-governmental corporate party. The ultimate parent company of 

Experian is Experian plc. Experian plc owns 100 percent of Experian. Experian plc is a Jersey, 

Channel Islands company which is publicly traded on the London Stock Exchange. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ Dorothy A. Kowal______

Dorothy A. Kowal, Esq. 

Price, Meese, Shulman & D’Arminio, P.C. 

50 Tice Boulevard Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677 

 Ph: (201) 391-3737 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

Dated: February 14, 2011 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. 

Case 3:10-cv-06489-FLW -LHG Document 12 Filed 02/14/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 74
EX-32
  ·   Section 1350 Certifications




GENEMEN
INC.





Pursuant
to Section  18U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Pursuant  to  section  906  of  the   Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002
(subsection  (a) and (b)
of  section  1350,  chapter 63 of title 18,
United  States  Code),  each of
the  undersigned  officers  of Genemen
Inc.,  a Nevada  corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify that:





The
Annual  Report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  August
31, 2008  (the  "Form  10-Q")  of  the  Company   fully   complies   with  the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
1934  and  information  contained  in
the  Form  10-Q  fairly presents,  in
all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
February 8, 2009





/s/ Qiaozhen
Chen


Qiaozhen
Chen


Principal
Executive Officer


and
Principal Financial Officer
Case 2:10-cr-00851-CCC Document 207 Filed 06/04/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 2097
Case 2:10-cr-00851-CCC Document 207 Filed 06/04/12 Page 2 of 6 PageID: 2098
Case 2:10-cr-00851-CCC Document 207 Filed 06/04/12 Page 3 of 6 PageID: 2099
Case 2:10-cr-00851-CCC Document 207 Filed 06/04/12 Page 4 of 6 PageID: 2100
Case 2:10-cr-00851-CCC Document 207 Filed 06/04/12 Page 5 of 6 PageID: 2101
Case 2:10-cr-00851-CCC Document 207 Filed 06/04/12 Page 6 of 6 PageID: 2102
# Cover

www.rrb.gov

# TotalEmployment
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Thomas A. Tolworthy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of VS Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                                     
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2007
|                      | 
|By:                   |  | /s/ Thomas A. Tolworthy             
|                      |  | Thomas A. Tolworthy                 
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906**

**of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Primoris ServicesCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Brian Pratt, Chairman of the Board, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

1.                                       The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

In witness whereof, the undersigned has executed and delivered thiscertificate as of the date set forth opposite his signature below.

 
| Date:  August 9, 2010 | /s/  BRIAN PRATT                                                            |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Brian  Pratt*Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive  Officer and President* |

 

----
# table3_q1_size
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Ruofei Chen, the Chief Executive Officer of CHINA INTERACTIVE EDUCATION, INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 19th day of August, 2010.

/s/ Ruofei Chen
Ruofei Chen
Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Interactive Education, Inc. and will be retained by China Interactive Education, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Westway Group, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Thomas A. Masilla, Jr.Name:

Thomas A. Masilla, Jr.Title:

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


Dated: November 9, 2010
48 Occupational Outlook Quarterly ● Fall 2002

Doctoral

degree

3.4

Professional 

degree

4.4

Master's 

degree

2.5

Bachelor's

degree

2.1

Associate

degree

1.6

Some college,

no degree

1.5

High school

diploma or

equivalent

1.2

Some 

high school,

no diploma

1.0 $

A new report from the U.S. Census Bureau underscores the

economic value of education: data show that over the course

of their working lives, adults are likely to have higher

earnings the more educated they are.

As the chart illustrates, high school dropouts have the

lowest expected lifetime earnings compared with workers at

all other levels of educational attainment. Professional and

doctoral degree holders have the highest. And financial gains

are predicted at each successive level of schooling completed

in between.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, “The Big Payoff: Educational Attainment and

Synthetic Estimates of Work-Life Earnings,” Current Population Reports,

P23-210, by Jennifer Cheeseman Day and Eric C. Newburger, available via

a link at www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/educ-attn.html.

Data are from March supplements to the Current Population Survey, 1998-

2000.

More education means

higher earnings—for life

Synthetic worklife earnings estimates by highest level of

educational attainment

(in millions of 1999 dollars)

Educational attainment alone does not determine an

individual’s earnings potential over his or her lifetime,

however; these estimates are group averages that assume fulltime, year-round employment throughout a 40-year work life.

Other factors—including occupation, field of study, and work

experience and continuity—may significantly affect a specific

worker’s income. For a more detailed discussion of earnings

for college graduates, see “College at work: Outlook and

earnings for college graduates” elsewhere in this issue of the

Occupational Outlook Quarterly.

Note: Earnings estimates are for full-time, year-round workers and are

based on 1997-99 work experience. “Synthetic” work-life earnings

estimates are created by using the working population’s 1-year annual

earnings and summing their age-specific average earnings for people aged

25 to 64. The resulting totals represent what individuals with the same

educational level could expect to earn, on average, in today’s dollars

during a hypothetical 40-year working life.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Pinnacle Gas Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald T.Barnes, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of theCompany, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: November 15, 2010

 
|   | /s/ Ronald T. Barnes                   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Ronald T. Barnes                       |
|   | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial |
|   | Officer and Secretary                  |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

MICHAEL HUDSON, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF 

WASHOE, 

Respondent, 

and 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Real Party in Interest. 

No. 83319 

FILED 

AUG 2 6 2021 

ELIZABETH A. BROWN 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

BY < ‘,/ 

DF_PtilY CLERK 

ORDER DENYING PETITION 

This original pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus 

challenges petitioner's conviction. Petitioner asserts that (1) he was 

sexually assaulted by prison staff; (2) illegally placed in a "sling hoise; (3) 

subject to a separate "viscous assault"; (4) the State has committed records 

fraud in his criminal case CR19-3112; and (5) he is innocent of the charges 

brought against him. 

At the outset, we note that petitioner has not provided this 

court with exhibits or other docurnentation that would support his claims 

for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an 

appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set 

forth in the petition); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 

88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) C`Petitioned cardies] the burden of demonstrating 

that extraordinary relief is warranted."). 

Moreover, having considered the petition, we are not persuaded 

that writ relief is warranted because petitioner has a plain, speedy, and 

' 

• • r •oy 
J. 

Hardesty 

Parraguirre 

Cadish 

• 

adequate remedy available to him by way of an appeal from the district 

court's denial of such relief in the first instance. See NRAP 22 CAn 

application for an original writ of habeas corpus should be made to the 

appropriate district court. If an application is made to the district court and 

denied, the proper remedy is by appeal from the district court's order 

denying the writ."); see also Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841 (writ relief 

is proper only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law). 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

cc: Michael Hudson 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

((>) i947A Map 

2