alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ellis TRICE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Donald EVERSOLE, Detective, Van Buren Sheriff’s Department; Patti Bonewell, Detective Crawford County Sheriff's Office, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-3566.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: March 7, 2013.

Filed: March 8, 2013.

Ellis Trice, Dermott, AR, pro se.

Michael Allen Mosley, Arkansas Municipal League, North Little Rock, AR, Clyde Burt Newell, Nicholas Rudolph Windle, Bachelor & Newell, Hot Springs, AR, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Ellis Trice appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Trice’s pro se appellate filings are to be liberally construed, *see Earl v. Fabian,*556 F.3d 717, 723 (8th Cir.2009), but we deem his failure to assert in his brief any grounds for reversal of the district court’s *637grant of summary judgment to be a waiver of any related issues on appeal, *see Harris v. Folk Constr. Co.,*138 F.3d 365, 366 n. 1 (8th Cir.1998). The judgment of the district court is affirmed, *see*8th Cir. R. 47B, and Trice’s two pending motion are denied.

1

. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable James R. Mar-schewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------



                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                       THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landauer, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William E. Saxelby, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

      i.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      ii.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




                                    /s/ William E. Saxelby
                                    ------------------------------------
                                    William E. Saxelby
                                    President & Chief Executive Officer



May 7, 2009
EXHIBIT 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew Couvell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Green Irons
Holdings Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e))for the
registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition Rules contained in
SEC release No. 33-8238;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: December 12, 2006


By: /s/ Andrew Couvell
        Andrew Couvell
        President, Chief Executie Officer,
        Chief Financial Officer, and Principal
        Accounting Officer
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Home Federal Corporation

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement No. 33-20330 on Form S-8 dated February 26, 1988, as amended, and in
Registration Statement No. 33-24328 on Form S-8 dated September 28, 1988, as 
amended, of our report dated February 16, 1996, on the condolidated financial
statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Home Federal 
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1995.

                                      /s/ Smith Elliott Kearns & Company
                                        SMITH ELLIOTT KEARNS & COMPANY

Hagerstown, Maryland
March 27, 1996
Exhibit 31.1
 
 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
 
 Certification Pursuant to Section 302
 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, Brian E. Stewart, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
 
 Date: April 30, 2012
 
 /s/ BRIAN E. STEWARTBrian E. StewartChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
#### NORRIS v. MOON et al.

Civ. No. 26149.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

May 11, 1949.

Franklin A. Polk, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

A. W. Thomas, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants.

JONES, Chief Judge.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries allegedly suffered by plaintiff as a result of a tractor and trailer operated by defendant being negligently driven into-the vehicle occupied by plaintiff. Defendant Orr owned the tractor and defendant Interstate owned the trailer attached thereto.

Defendants have filed a motion for a more definite statement as to plaintiff’s injuries and to require plaintiff to elect against which of the defendants she will proceed.

Paragraph 3 of the complaint seems-to be of sufficient clarity and detail to enable defendants to prepare a responsive-pleading. See Form 9, Appendix of Forms,. Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

*215There appears to be no authority for the proposition that plaintiff must be required to elect as to parties at this stage of pleading where joint or several liability is alleged.

Defendants’ motion will be overruled.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Archon Corporation (the "Company"), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



Dated:
December 20, 2002

|/s/PAUL W. LOWDENPaul W. Lowden
Chairman of the Board and President
(Principal Executive Officer)                           |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                                                                            |  | 
|/s/CHARLES W. SANDEFURCharles W. Sandefur
Director and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |  | 

---

QuickLinks
The State of/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 21, 2015

No. 04-15-00400-CR

Rene GUERRERO,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR3173

Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain 

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea 

bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the 

prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. Therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately 

reflects that the criminal case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

This court must dismiss the appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has a right 

of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” Id. R. 25.2(d); see Chavez v. 

State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). 

Therefore, we ORDER that this appeal will be dismissed under rule 25.2(d) of the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure unless Appellant causes an amended trial court certification to be 

filed within THIRTY days of the date of this order showing Appellant has the right of appeal. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2005); Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.).

All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.
_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 10, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Richard
              A. RappaportRichard
                A. Rappaport
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              August
                8, 2006
BLS Data Users Advisory Committee 

November 9, 2021

12:00 pm Commissioner’s Welcome and Review of Agency Developments

12:30 pm Gaining Input on Automation and Its Impact on the Workforce

Presenter: Cindy Cunningham, Office of Productivity and Technology

Discussant: Randy Eberts

1:30 pm Break

1:45 pm Measuring Changes in Retail Trade

Presenters: Kevin Cooksey, Office of Employment and Unemployment Statistics

Jenny Rudd, Office of Productivity and Technology

Brian Chansky, Office of Productivity and Technology

Vincent Russo, Office of Prices and Living Conditions 

Discussant: Jack Kleinhenz

3:00 Using Administrative Data in the Import and Export Price Indexes 

Presenter: Aric Schneider, Office of Prices and Living Conditions

Discussant: Christine Ries

3:40 pm Discussion of Future Topics and Concluding Remarks

4:00 pm Conclusion

All times Eastern Standard Time.
RECE~VED ~U\~ COURT OF C~IMINAL APPEALS 

JUL 27 2015 

~· .· 
\~ ~c..R ~~ ~lA_~ 

\\, ~. \-.S'c.\ \S"()Ia;Q-E 

\..o~-ll\ k~~-ld._ 

\\~~\__~U\~\-~ ~\~~~ \...\) \\~~tS\\_.\\:\~~ ~~\'~ ~~l_~~"Th"-\ 

~\) ~~'0.~~~ ~~ \\\ \)u_ \ ~~~\.\:..~ ~\\~~~ \)~ \t\.t.. 

~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~G 1.D \\~~~~ \\\~ '\\_E~~-\~ ~\_;t.\Ji.~1...~G 

\:)~ \\\c ~\\\\_~ ~~\'~ ~~ \_~~~~ ~1.~~-s...~b D~ ~FH~.Lo 

\ 

· · ~'M_ ~~~~ \..'N_ ~tm'<\tt ~lA-~ ~\\~~L~~~·L\le!'\ D'ft- hl_~ \J_~~ 

'~"" .. 
~~~~\ .. 

~~~~"'r~ 

V\s' .~~~ ~~ \f'c..\l.~r 

'"""\~L ~ -~~. \$'-\\ol \4 

~~ ~t;~ulli:l: :J.l~ \ ~ \"\ ~q_ \\S I 

·~~C\.. ~oS~~~ l~~~
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of -- ) 

) 

Spectrum-Insight, Joint Venture ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W9 l 2PL-l O-C-0039 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 58822, 59972, 59973 

Jonathan A. DeMella, Esq. 

Kate H. Kennedy, Esq. 

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 

Seattle, WA 

Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

John F. Bazan, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorney 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Los Angeles 

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE PEACOCK 

It is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the 

parties' Settlement Agreement, dated 15 July 2016, resulting from an Alternative Dispute 

Resolution process following a ten-day hearing, and the parties' 3 August 2016 

"REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT," that the appeals are sustained. 

In the nature of a consent judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in 

the amount of $2,750,000. Pursuant to paragraph 2.b. of the parties' Settlement 

Agreement, if payment is not made within 60 days from the date of this decision, interest 

shall be paid on this amount pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 7109 commencing on the 6Pt day 

until date of payment. 

Dated: 9 August 2016 

(Signatures continued) 
I concur 

MARK 

~~· N. STEMPLER 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I concur 

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 58822, 59972, 59973, 

Appeals of Spectrum-Insight, Joint Venture, rendered in conformance with the Board's 

Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
#     All Disorders  

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPRSTVWZ
View All

## A

Absence of the Septum Pellucidum

Acid Lipase Disease

Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis

Adrenoleukodystrophy

Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome

Alexander Disease

Alzheimer's Disease

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

Angelman Syndrome

Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Arachnoid Cysts

Arachnoiditis

Arteriovenous Malformations (AVMs)

Ataxia and Cerebellar or Spinocerebellar Degeneration

Ataxia Telangiectasia

Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Autism Spectrum Disorder
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Susser Holdings Corporation (the Company) for the three months ended
July 4, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mary E. Sullivan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 13, 2010

/s/ Mary E. SullivanMary E. SullivanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RANDY ERIC FULLER,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

T. FELKER, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 07-56473

D.C. No. CV-07-00547-R

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 10, 2010** 

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Randy Eric Fuller appeals from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

FILED

AUG 26 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-56473

Fuller contends that his federal petition was timely because he is entitled to

equitable tolling due to a prison lockdown, which inhibited his access to the prison

law library. This contention fails because Fuller’s lack of access to the law library,

per se, was not an extraordinary circumstance that might have caused the

untimeliness of his petition. See Ramirez v. Yates, 571 F.3d 993, 997-98 (9th Cir.

2009).

In the alternative, Fuller contends that he is entitled to an evidentiary

hearing. Fuller’s reliance on Whalem/Hunt v. Early, 233 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2000)

(en banc) is unavailing because, unlike Whalem/Hunt, even if Fuller’s allegations

are true, equitable tolling would not be warranted.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 23.2

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
(Form S-8 No.  33-29612)  pertaining  to the 1987 Stock  Option  Plan of Kimmins
Corp. and in the related  Prospectus,  of our report dated March 31, 2000,  with
respect to the consolidated  financial  statements and schedule of Kimmins Corp.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.




                                           /s/ GIUNTA, FERLITA & WALSH, PA



Tampa, Florida
March 31, 2000
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
  AMENDMENT
TO THE
CONSTRUCTION AND TERM LOAN SUPPLEMENT
 THIS AMENDMENT FARM CREDIT SERVICES OF AMERICA,
FLCA WESTERN IOWA ENERGY, LLC, Wall Lake, Iowa
 BACKGROUND
   SECTION 6. Promissory Note.
 plus minus




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 FARM CREDIT SERVIES OF AMERICA, FLCA
    
    WESTERN IOWA ENERGY, LLCBy:
    
    /s/ Shane Frahm
    
    By:
    
    /s/ William J. HoranTitle:
    
    Vice President
    
    Title:
    
    Chair
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1115 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit the Commissioner 

of the Internal Revenue Service from rehiring any employee of the 

Internal Revenue Service who was involuntarily separated from service 

for misconduct. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 10, 2019 

Mr. BURR (for himself, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. ROBERTS, and Mr. ENZI) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 

the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service from 

rehiring any employee of the Internal Revenue Service 

who was involuntarily separated from service for misconduct. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Integrity in 

5 the IRS Workforce Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1115 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REHIRING FORMER IRS EMPLOY2 EES WHO WERE INVOLUNTARILY SEPARATED 

3 FOR MISCONDUCT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7804 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(d) PROHIBITION ON REHIRING EMPLOYEES INVOL8 UNTARILY SEPARATED.—The Commissioner may not em9 ploy any individual previously employed by the Commis10 sioner who was removed for misconduct under this sub11 chapter or chapter 43 or chapter 75 of title 5, United 

12 States Code, or whose employment was terminated under 

13 section 1203 of the Internal Revenue Service Restruc14 turing and Reform Act of 1998 (26 U.S.C. 7804 note).’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

16 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para17 graph (2), the amendment made by subsection (a) 

18 shall apply with respect to any employee removed 

19 from employment before, on, or after the date of the 

20 enactment of this Act. 

21 (2) EXCEPTION.—The amendment made by 

22 subsection (a) shall not apply to any employee who 

23 is employed by the Internal Revenue Service as of 

24 the date of the enactment of this Act with respect 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1115 IS

1 to any removal for misconduct which occurred before 

2 such date. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS