alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-29-2000
<CASH>                                            2538
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1867
<ALLOWANCES>                                        94
<INVENTORY>                                      44125
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 57064
<PP&E>                                           67009
<DEPRECIATION>                                   32854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   95955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            40921
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           105
<OTHER-SE>                                       44496
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     95955
<SALES>                                         336847
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                336847
<CGS>                                           215731
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   215731
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 33051
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1895
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   7809
<INCOME-TAX>                                       735
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               7074
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      7074
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.67


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31


       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


I, Douglas R. Krueger, President of Citicorp Mortgage Securities, Inc., certify
that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
     8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
     periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Citicorp
     Mortgage Securities, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
     does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
     material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
     circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
     the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based upon my knowledge, the servicing information required to be provided
     to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement is
     included in these reports;

4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
     under the pooling and servicing agreement and based upon the review
     required under the pooling and servicing agreement, and except as disclosed
     in the report, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
     servicing agreement; and

5.   I have disclosed to the registrant's certified public accountants all
     significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's compliance with the
     minimum servicing standards in accordance with a review conducted in
     compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
     or similar standard as set forth in the pooling and servicing agreement.

Date: March 28, 2006


   /s/ Douglas R. Krueger
------------------------------
Name:  Douglas R. Krueger
Title: President
**Exhibit
        32**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Northeast Automotive Holdings, Inc.,
        (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,
        2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
        (the "Report"), I, William Solko, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
        Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32, fully
                  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Registrant
  Dated:
                May 14 , 2008
              By:
              /s/
                William SolkoWilliam
                  Solko, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                  Officer
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be
        retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
        Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 This
        certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
        by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of
        1933
        or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the
        date of
        the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language
        contained in such filing.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906**

**of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Section 1350)**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Primoris Services Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Peter J. Moerbeek, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer andDirector of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to my knowledge:

 

1.                          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

In witness whereof, theundersigned has executed and delivered this certificate as of the date setforth opposite his signature below.

 
| Date: November 9,  2010 | /s/ PETER J. MOERBEEK                                                             |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Peter J. Moerbeek*Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director* |

 

1

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 123 (Monday, June 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31042-31043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15355]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1838-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]


West Virginia; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of West Virginia (FEMA-1838-DR), dated May 15, 2009, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: June 12, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of West Virginia is hereby amended to include the 
following area among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of May 15, 2009.

    Calhoun County for Individual Assistance (already designated for 
Public Assistance).


[[Page 31043]]


    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-15355 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 21, 2015

NO. 03-14-00212-CV

City of Austin, Texas, Appellant

v.

Jamil Cherry, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on October 16, 2013. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in 

the court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s judgment and remands the 

case to the trial court to allow appellee to amend his pleadings. Appellee shall pay all costs 

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
# table47_q5.5_state
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of SRKP 10, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard A. RappaportRichard
      A. RappaportPrincipal
      Executive OfficerApril
      22, 2009
# table11_q3.2_state
Exhibit 31.1

Certifications

SECTION 302

I, David Stark, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Stem Cell Therapy
International, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the condensed consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the condensed consolidated financial condition, consolidated results of operations and consolidated cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a  15(f) and 15d  15(f) for the registrant have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether
or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                |  |  |  |           |  |                  
|--------------- |  |  |  | --------- |  | -----------------
|/s/ David Stark |  |  |  | President |  | November 14, 2008
|David Stark     |  |  |  |           |  |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6224

CHARLES ROBERT MORRIS, III,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DANNY WHITE, Probation Officer; RONALD J. CAVANAUGH, Chief 

Probation Officer; RYAN HALL, Probation Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. 

(1:14-cv-01391-LO-TRJ)

Submitted: July 21, 2015 Decided: July 23, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Robert Morris, III, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Robert Morris, III appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. See Morris v. White, No. 1:14-cv-01391-

LO-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 7, 2015; entered Jan. 8, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Yasmeen N. Ellison, Appellant.

[977 NYS2d 663]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J.), rendered on or about December 7, 2011, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Concur— Tom, J.E, Friedman, Renwick, Feinman and Clark, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

   

I, Brad E. Herr, certify that: 

   

1.   I have reviewed this Form 10-Q/A of Cannabis Sativa, Inc., (the “Registrant”); 

   

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

   

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

   

4.   The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: 

   

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

   

d) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

   

5.   The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions); 

   

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

   

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
CAUSE NO. 03-14-00698-CV

___________________ _____________________
IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

___________________ _____________________
S HAMARK S MITH L IMITED P ARTNERSHIP , ET AL ., Appellants,

v.

M ARTIN L ONGORIA , Appellee.

___________________ _____________________
FIRST UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANTS’ BRIEF

___________________ _____________________ On Appeal from the 20th Judicial Di strict Court of Milam County, Texas

___________________ _____________________

Tracy J. Willi Texas State Bar No. 00784633 Willi Law Firm, P.C. 9600 Escarpment Blvd., Suite 745, PMB 34 Austin, TX 78749-1983 Tel. (512) 288-3204 Fax (512) 677-2010 twilli@willi.com

ATTORNEY FOR SHAMARK SMITH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, SHARON D. MARCUS, AND PAUL J. SMITH ACCEPTED 03-14-00698-CV 3600209 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 12/29/2014 11:20:52 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

### 2 FIRST UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANTS’ BRIEF
Shamark Smith Limited Partnership, Sharon D. Marcus, and Paul J. Smith file this
First Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellants’ Brief.

The trial court in this case entered its judgment on August 15, 2014. The
Appellants’ Brief is due to be filed on January 5, 2015.

Due to the interv ening holidays and the fact that Appellants ’ counsel has a prepaid

vacation scheduled, there will not be sufficien t time to complete the Appellants’ Brief.
Appellants request an extension of thirty days to file the Appellants’ Brief.
Therefore, Appellants request the deadline fo r Appellants’ Brief to be extended for
thirty days from January 5, 2015 to February 4, 2015 . This motion is filed not for delay
but so that justice can be done.

### 3 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Tracy J. Willi Tracy J. Willi Texas State Bar No. 00784633 Willi Law Firm, P.C. 9600 Escarpment Blvd., Suite 745, PMB 34 Austin, TX 78749-1983 Tel. (512) 288-3204 Fax (512) 677-2010 twilli@willi.com

ATTORNEY FOR SHAMARK SMITH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, SHARON D. MARCUS, AND PAUL J. SMITH

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I hereby certify that I conferred with op posing counsel, James David Walker, and he is not opposed to this motion.
/s/ Tracy J. Willi Tracy J. Willi

### 4 CERTIFICATE OF FILING AND SERVICE
I hereby certify that this document was filed with Clerk of Court through the Court’s electronic filing system (“efs”) and se rved on all counsel of record by email on December 29, 2014, as follows:

James David Walker P.O. Box 41 Milano, Texas 76556 (512) 636-9520 (512) 455-7992 (fax) walker@2appeal.com

ATTORNEY FOR MART IN M. LONGORIA

/s/ Tracy J. Willi Tracy J. Willi
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15490]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

Princeton University

Notice of Decision on Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific 
Instruments

This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, as amended by Pub. L .106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301. 
Related records can be viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 
3705, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave, NW, 
Washington, D.C.
Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of no instruments 
of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument described 
below, for such purposes as this is intended to be used, that was being 
manufactured in the United States at the time of its order.
Docket Number: 09-022. Applicant: Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 
08544. Instrument: SWAXS Dual 1D Position-Sensitive-Detector (PSD) 
System. Manufacturer: Hecus X-Ray System GmbH, Austria. Intended Use: 
See notice at 74 FR 23393, May 19, 2009. Reasons: The instrument is 
unique, in that it is a dual system, which allows simultaneous 
acquisition of time resolved small-angle and wide-angle x-ray 
scattering data. Justification for Duty-Free Entry: We know of no 
instrument of the same general category suited to these purposes, which 
was being manufactured in the United States at the time of order of 
each instrument

    Dated: June 22, 2009.
Christopher Cassel,
Acting Director.
Subsidies Enforcement Office.
Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-15490 Filed 6-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
```