alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 878 

Encouraging people in the United States to recognize Monday, March 2, 

2020, as Read Across America Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2020 

Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois (for himself and Mrs. DAVIS of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Encouraging people in the United States to recognize 

Monday, March 2, 2020, as Read Across America Day. 

Whereas reading is a basic requirement for quality education 

and professional success, and is a source of pleasure 

throughout life; 

Whereas the people of the United States must be able to read 

if the United States is to remain competitive in the global 

economy; 

Whereas Congress has placed great emphasis on reading 

intervention and providing additional resources for reading assistance, including through the programs authorized by the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 

1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.) and through annual appropriations for library and literacy programs; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 878 IH 

Whereas more than 50 national organizations concerned 

about reading and education have joined with the National Education Association (NEA) to use March 2d to 

celebrate reading and all authors who ignite a love of 

reading: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors all authors for their success in en3 couraging children to discover the joy of reading, in4 cluding authors like Theodor Geisel (also known as 

5 ‘‘Dr. Seuss’’) and Patricia McKissack; 

6 (2) honors the 23rd anniversary of Read Across 

7 America Day; 

8 (3) encourages parents, educators, and commu9 nities to read with their children for at least 30 min10 utes on Read Across America Day in honor of the 

11 commitment of the House of Representatives to 

12 building a Nation of readers; and 

13 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

14 to observe Read Across America Day with appro15 priate ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.5
 AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT
  WHEREAS
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE
 1.
    
    Section 12.1 of the Agreement is amended and restated to read as follows:Section 12.1 Redemption, Sale to Substitute Stockholder.Upon the occurrence of any of the following events, the shares held by any
then-current stockholder of the Practice will automatically be redeemed by the
Practice, and the Practice, without the need for any further action by any
Practice stockholder, officer or director, will immediately sell such shares to an
individual who is qualified to hold such shares under Delaware law:




---



##### 



2.
    
    Section 12.2 of the Agreement is amended and restated to read as follows:Section 12.2 Conduct of Business Following Redemption. In the case of
redemption by the Practice as a result of any of the events described in Section
12.1, the Practice agrees that it will conduct its business in the ordinary course
and will comply with all obligations which it is subject to, including, but not
limited to this Management Agreement and all client agreements.




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Robert C. KillTitle:
    
    President and Chief Executive OfficerVIRTUAL RADIOLOGICPROFESSIONALS OF MINNESOTA, P.A.By:
    
    /s/ Eduard Michel, M.D.Title:
    
    President/s/
Eduard Michel, M.D.Eduard Michel, M.D.
Exhibit 99.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Owens-Illinois Group,
Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that to such officer's knowledge:



|Dated: March 27, 2003 |  | /s/THOMAS L. YOUNGThomas L. Young
President
Owens-Illinois Group, Inc.
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

---

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Owens-Illinois Group, Inc. and will be retained by Owens-Illinois Group, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

E-5

---

QuickLinks
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL

Justice

MACKEY K. HANCOCK

Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE

Justice

Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas

Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A

Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449

www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx

VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

July 15, 2015

Daniel Lee Ainsworth

Inmate #149534

Potter County Detention Center

13100 NE 29th

Amarillo, TX 79111

John Terry

Attorney at Law

301 S. Polk, Suite 630

Amarillo, TX 79101

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Scott Brumley

Potter County Attorney's Office

500 S Fillmore St., Room 301

Amarillo, TX 79101-2437

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 07-15-00091-CR, 07-15-00106-CR, 07-15-00107-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 141066, 141094, 141118

Style: Ex parte Daniel Lee Ainsworth

Dear Mr. Ainsworth and Counsel:

The Court this day issued an opinion, judgment, and mandate in the captioned cause. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 48. 

In addition, pursuant to Texas Government Code, Sec. 51.204(b)(2), exhibits on file with

this Court, if any, will be destroyed three years after final disposition of the case or at an earlier

date if ordered by the Court. 

Very truly yours,

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

xc: Honorable W. F. (Corky) Roberts (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Dedra Morgan (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Brooks Barfield Jr. (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Julie Smith (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

FILE COPY
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5280-N-25]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         July 2, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565 (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: June 25, 2009.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. E9-15477 Filed 7-1-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 919 

Condemning the United Nations decision to appoint China a seat on its 

Human Rights Council. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2020 

Mr. STEUBE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the United Nations decision to appoint China 

a seat on its Human Rights Council. 

Whereas, on April 1, 2020, China was appointed to a United 

Nations Human Rights Council panel; 

Whereas the United Nations Human Rights Council 

(UNHRC) has been criticized for being influenced by 

countries widely perceived as having poor human rights 

records; 

Whereas China rejected recommendations made by the 

Human Rights Council related to human rights activists, 

extrajudicial detention, freedom of belief, freedom of expression, and the rights of ethnic minorities; 

Whereas some countries called on China to ensure greater 

protections of the rights of ethnic minorities; 

2 

•HRES 919 IH 

Whereas China violated basic privacy rights by spying on its 

own people; 

Whereas during the COVID–19 outbreak, China further suppressed religion in the country by destroying places of 

worship or placing them under heavy surveillance; 

Whereas in 2018, the United States left the Council; 

Whereas in 2018, the Department of State released its Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, highlighting 

China for engaging in some of the worst human rights 

violations; 

Whereas former United States Ambassador to the United 

Nations Nikki Haley called the Council ‘‘a protector of 

human rights abusers, and a cesspool of political bias’’; 

Whereas former United States Ambassador to the United 

Nations Nikki Haley tweeted that ‘‘China was appointed 

on Wednesday to a UN Human Rights Council panel 

where it will play a key role in picking the world body’s 

human rights investigators—including global monitors on 

freedom of speech, health, enforced disappearances, and 

arbitrary detention. You can’t make this up!’’; 

Whereas United States Government senior officials have expressed concerns about the completeness and timeliness 

of information China is reporting on COVID–19; and 

Whereas China’s failure to be transparent with global leaders 

about the outbreak has cost thousands of lives: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) condemns the United Nations decision to 

3 appoint China a seat on its Human Rights Council; 

3 

•HRES 919 IH 

1 (2) demands serious reform if the United States 

2 is going to remain in the United Nations and pro3 vide funding to countries that ignore basic human 

4 rights; and 

5 (3) holds China and the United Nations ac6 countable for human rights violations. 

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, July 20, 2009, 8 a.m. to July 21, 2009, 6 p.m., Ritz Carlton Hotel, 1150 22nd Street, NW., Washington, DC, 20037 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 15, 2009, 74 FR 28260-28262.                

The meeting will be held at the Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015. The meeting dates and time remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: June 22, 2009.

Anna Snouffer,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-15588 Filed 6-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
----

----

Integrated Management Information, Inc. 10-Q

|   | (i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |
|--------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: May 13, 2011                     |
| /s/ John Saunders­                |   |
| John Saunders, Chief Executive Officer |
Casey Industrial, 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 20, 2015

No. 04-14-00429-CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

Appellant

v.

CASEY INDUSTRIAL, INC.,

Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CI-06252

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing is 

GRANTED. Time is extended to August 17, 2015.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-41005

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KENDRICK DEROY ALLEN,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:94-CR-1-1

- - - - - - - - - -

July 26, 1996

Before GARWOOD, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In this direct criminal appeal, Kendrick Deroy Allen argues

that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress

evidence obtained as a result of an illegal stop of the vehicle

in which he was a passenger. Allen also argues that his

statement was involuntarily obtained under coercive conditions

and after he had invoked the right to counsel.

We have reviewed the record, including the transcript of the

hearing on the motion to suppress, the opinion of the district 
No. 95-41005

-2-

court, and the briefs, and find that the denial of the motion to

suppress should be affirmed substantially for the reasons adopted

by the district court. See United States v. Kendrick, No. 94-CR1-1 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 3, 1995).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 13

               SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.  AND SUBSIDIARIES 
                            SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts) 
<CAPTION>

                                                                Fiscal Year Ended          
                                       Dec. 30,      Dec. 31,        Jan. 1,        Jan. 2,        Dec. 28,     
                                         1995          1994            1994           1993           1991     
<S>                                  <C>            <C>         <C>               <C>            <C>  
OPERATIONS DATA

Total revenue                         $  540,345     $ 450,823     $  353,806     $  307,274     $  213,272     
Income (loss) before income taxes     $   47,327     $  38,800     $   (6,331)    $   15,884     $  (52,379)     
Net income (loss)                     $   35,073     $  33,134     $   (7,524)    $   14,433     $  (48,661)     
Net income (loss) per share           $     1.04     $    1.03     $     (.26)    $      .55     $    (2.10)     
Average shares outstanding                33,665        32,028         29,335         26,120         23,188     

BALANCE SHEET DATA

Working capital                       $  214,749     $ 168,468     $  134,156     $   86,914     $   65,672     
Total assets                          $  503,923     $ 435,977     $  375,424     $  278,759     $  246,280     
Long-term obligations                 $    9,106     $  10,341     $   10,906     $   24,034     $    7,198     
Shareholders' equity                  $  353,188     $ 291,195     $  243,488     $  172,502     $  149,461     




</TABLE>
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Great Health Care Chiropractic, P.C., as Assignee of MICHELLE THANE, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Tri State Consumers Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Jodi Orlow, J.), entered June 21, 2013. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff moved for summary judgment, and defendant cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled independent medical examinations (IMEs). The Civil Court denied plaintiff's motion and granted defendant's cross motion.</p><p>On appeal, plaintiff argues that defendant failed to establish that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled IMEs and that, as a result, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment should have been granted and defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should have been denied. Contrary to plaintiff's contention, the affidavits submitted by defendant were sufficient to establish that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for the duly scheduled IMEs. An assignor's appearance at an IME "is a condition precedent to the insurer's liability on the policy" (<i>Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.</i>, 35 AD3d 720, 722 [2006]).</p><p>We note that plaintiff's remaining contention is not properly before this court, as this argument is being raised for the first time on appeal, and we decline to consider it (<i>see Joe v Upper Room Ministries, Inc.</i>, 88 AD3d 963 [2011]; <i>Gulf Ins. Co. v Kanen</i>, 13 AD3d 579 [2004]).</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p><p>Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: June 03, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL

STATE OF TEXAS

PENALTY FO<83 *M

PRIVATE USE

000140162M/1AY, 28 2015

5/27/2015 - \ ' " 7GOA Case No. 04-14-00099-CR

RODRIGUEZ, RODOLFQ MATA Tr.[Ct„'No. 2013CR4828 PD-0631-15

On this day the Appellant's Pro Se motion for extension of time to file petition for

discretionary review has been denied.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

RODOLFO MATA RODRIGUEZ

TDC# 1912187

pARZA WEST UNIT

4304HIGHWAY 202

IBEEVME, TX 78102-8981
#### Ari Kramer, as Administrator of the Estate of Irving T. Bush, Deceased, and as Executor of Virginia Casey Bush, *264Deceased, Respondent, v Ioannis Danalis, Appellant.

[854 NYS2d 112]

There was no basis for the court to consider summary judgment on plaintiffs unpleaded claim for enforcement of the operating agreement. Summary judgment may be awarded on an unpleaded cause of action only if the proof supports such a claim and if the opposing party has not been misled to its prejudice (W*einstock v Handler,*254 AD2d 165, 166 [1998]).

Here, the amended complaint does not even make reference to the operating agreement, and in fact seeks to have all the agreements declared void, which is contradictory to the relief actually granted. Furthermore, even if it were appropriate to consider the unpleaded claim, summary judgment would not lie. The court erred in finding that a February 2002 interest holders’ agreement between defendant and plaintiffs decedent Irving Bush was superseded by a subsequent operating agreement dated October 4, 2002, which swas neither the subject of negotiation between defendant and Irving nor pertained to precisely the same subject matter.

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur-Mazzarelli, J.P., Williams, Sweeny, Catterson and Moskowitz, JJ.