alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 19, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135187 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

RAYMOND WARRING and Robert P. Young, Jr. 

MARK H. WARRING, Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 135187 

 COA: 261497 

Hillsdale CC: 04-000149-CZ 

TOTAL MANUFACTURING 

SYSTEMS INC.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 7, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0211 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 19, 2008 

 Clerk
(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
period ended June 30, 2009 (the Report), filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
  /s/ Marc J. Eisenberg

Marc J. EisenbergPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            2418
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1526
<ALLOWANCES>                                        80
<INVENTORY>                                      45639
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 55387
<PP&E>                                           62084
<DEPRECIATION>                                   28638
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   92827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            44741
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           104
<OTHER-SE>                                       37313
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     92827
<SALES>                                         328059
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                328059
<CGS>                                           211893
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   211893
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 31768
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5497
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1114
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4383
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4383
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
# table16_q4.1_naics
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Imperiali, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the year ended August 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Imperato,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge:




1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Daniel
      ImperatoDaniel
      ImperatoPrincipal
      Financial OfficerJuly
      17, 2009
EXHIBIT
31.2


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER
 
 I, C.
Andrew Brooks, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this Form 10-Q of RedRoller Holdings, Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
 
 (a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting; and
 
 5. The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.
  Dated:      
      August 19, 2008
                  
                  /s/ C.
      Andrew BrooksC.
      Andrew BrooksExec.
      Vice President, Treasurer and Asst Secy
                      (principal
      financial and accounting officer)
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000366

21-JUL-2015

08:36 AM
#### Benjamin J. Ashmore, Sr., Appellant, v Wilma Cohen Lewis, Respondent.

[976 NYS2d 389]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered January 27, 2012, which granted defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the complaint, deemed an appeal from judgment, same court and Justice, entered February 7, 2012, dismissing the complaint (CPLR 5501 [c]), and, so considered, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The documentary evidence submitted by defendant, a psychologist appointed by the court as the neutral forensic evalúa*509tor with the consent of the parties’ attorneys and the children’s attorney in an underlying custody proceeding in Kings County Supreme Court, established conclusively that judicial immunity precludes plaintiff from recovering damages for negligence or malpractice against her (see *Bridget M. v Billick,*36 AD3d 489 [1st Dept 2007]).

While immunity is not absolute where a court-appointed expert acts beyond the scope of her authority *(see generally Della Pietra v State of New York,*71 NY2d 792 [1988]), plaintiff failed to establish that defendant acted beyond the scope of her authority, or to show any exception that would warrant lifting the immunity.

We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Friedman, J.R, Acosta, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2012 NY Slip Op 30189(U).]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,920]

In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on May 15, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Toyal America, Inc., Lockport, Illinois.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 18th day of May 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-15219 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### In the Matter of Patricia A., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 901]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Hunt, J.), dated May 9, 2005, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated March 31, 2005, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of assault in the second degree, adjudged her to be a juvenile delinquent, and, among other things, placed her on probation for a period of 18 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated March 31, 2005.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Initially, the appellant’s claims are not preserved for appellate review because she failed to raise these issues with specificity in her motion for dismissal for failure to prove a prima facie case *(cf.*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Dandrade,*300 AD2d 502, 503 [2002]; *see Matter of Marcel F.,*233 AD2d 442 [1996]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency, as we must *(see Matter of David H.,*69 *700NY2d 792, 793 [1987]; *Matter of Nicholas*A., 28 AD3d 477 [2006]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the appellant committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of assault in the second degree *(see*Penal Law § 120.05 [2]). The evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing was sufficient to establish not only that the complainant sustained “physical injury” (Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; *see Matter of Jason J.,*187 AD2d 652, 652-654 [1992]; *cf People v Henderson,*92 NY2d 677, 680 [1999]; *People v Rambali,*27 AD3d 582, 583 [2006]; *People v Luster,*306 AD2d 293 [2003]; *People v Williams,*203 AD2d 608 [1994]), but also, that the appellant caused the physical injury by means of a “dangerous instrument” by the manner in which she used her boots to stomp on the complainant’s face *(see*Penal Law § 120.05 [2]; *cf People v Carter,*53 NY2d 113, 117 [1981]; *People v Hansen,*267 AD2d 474 [1999] [boot used to kick complainant]; *People v Hansen,*203 AD2d 588 [1994] [sneakers used to kick complainant]; *see Matter of Jason J., supra*at 653 [shoe, sneaker or boot used to kick complainant]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the findings of fact were not against the weight of the evidence *(cf.*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Miller, J.E, Goldstein, Mastro and Dillon, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 118 (Monday, June 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 29466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14311]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Ketchikan Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Ketchikan Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Ketchikan, Alaska, July 23, 2009. The purpose of this meeting is to 
discuss potential projects under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act of 2008.

DATES: The meeting will be held July 23, 2009 at 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Southeast Alaska Discovery 
Center Learning Room (back entrance), 50 Main Street, Ketchikan, 
Alaska. Send written comments to Ketchikan Resource Advisory Committee, 
c/o District Ranger, USDA Forest Service, 3031 Tongass Ave., Ketchikan, 
AK 99901, or electronically to Diane Daniels, RAC Coordinator at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e1a1a1f10171b120d3e180d50181b1a500b0d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cda9a9aca3a4a8a1be8dabbee3aba8a9e3b8be">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Daniels, RAC Coordinator 
Ketchikan-Misty Fiords Ranger District, Tongass National Forest, (907) 
228-4105.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. 
However, public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will 
have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

    Dated: June 3, 2009.
Forrest Cole,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E9-14311 Filed 6-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) of Marathon Acquisition Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael S. Gross, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



/s/ Michael S. GrossName: Michael S. Gross Date: May 15,
2007
TDCJ Offender Details Page 1 of2 

New Offender Search 

Offender Information Details 

Return to Search list 

SID Number: 

TDCJ Number: 

Name: 

Race: 

Gender: 

DOB: 

Maximum Sentence Date: 

Current Facility: 

Projected Release Date: 

Parole Eligibility Date: 

Offender Visitation Eligible: 

04749185 

01504681 

CAMPOS,RICARDO SANMIGUEL 

H 

M 

1934-02-07 

' 2057-10-18 

ESTELLE 

2057-10-18 

2032-10-18 

YES 

Information provided is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times per day 

on visitation days. Because this information is subject to change, family members and 

friends are encouraged to call the unit prior to traveling for a visit. 

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE: 

Scheduled Release Date: Offender is not scheduled for release at this time. 

Scheduled Release Type: Will be determined when release date is scheduled. 

Scheduled Release Location: 

1 ,:. Parole Review Information · : 

Offense History: 

Offense 

Date 

I 

Offense 

I 

Will be determined when release date is scheduled. 

Sentence 

Date 

I 

County 

I . 

Case 

No. 

I 

I 

Sentence (YYMM-DD) 

http://offender.tdcj.texas.gov/OffenderSearchloffenderDetail.action?sid=04749185 7/27/2015
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KAREN CAMERON,

Appellant,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 

Successor By Merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., F/K/A 

Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P.,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-2148 

[July 22, 2015]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Roger B. Colton, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 502012CA 

003454 XXXX MB DIV AW.

Michael Vater, Peter Ticktin, Joshua Bleil, and Kendrick Almaguer of 

The Ticktin Law Group, P.A., Deerfield Beach, for appellant.

William L. Noriega Jr. of Florida Foreclosure Attorneys, PLLC, 

Clearwater, for appellee. 

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Based on appellee’s confession of error, we reverse the circuit court’s 

final summary judgment of foreclosure and remand for further 

proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

CIKLIN, C.J., GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

JOHN LEWIS RUSH,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 394 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of April, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Opinion issued July 23, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00551-CV

———————————

IN RE CAMP LA JUNTA 1928, LP, BLAKE SMITH, CAMP LA JUNTA, 

INC., AND CLJ MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, L.L.C., Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

By petition for writ of mandamus, relators, Camp La Junta 1928, LP, Blake 

Smith, Camp La Junta, Inc., and CLJ Management Systems, L.L.C., seek 

mandamus relief from the trial court’s May 29, 2015 order denying their Amended 

Motion for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem.1

 

1

The underlying case is Johnny Doe, by and Through his Parents, John Doe and 

Jane Doe v. Camp LaJunta 1928, LP., and Blake Smith, No. 2012-31192, pending 
2

We DENY the petition for writ of mandamus. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Massengale. 

 

in the 333rd District Court of Harris County, the Hon. Joseph “Tad” Halbach,

presiding.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stem Cell Therapy International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Daniel Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:   August 21, 2006
                                             /s/Daniel Sullivan
                                             ---------------------------
                                             Chief Financial Officer


                                       1
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0858. DAVID SHANYFELT v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE,

INC.

David Shanyfelt filed a complaint and motion for quiet title, injunctive relief,

declaratory judgment, and damages, as well as a motion for appointment of a special

master pursuant to OCGA § 23-3-63. Shanyfeltspecifically alleged that Wells Fargo

Home Mortgage, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Wachovia Mortgage Corp.,

wrongfully foreclosed on 5990 Robbs Drive, Cumming, Georgia, when the security

deed at issue shows that the property associated with the deed is 6020 Robbs Drive,

Cumming, Georgia. Shanyfelt requested, among other things, a petition to quiet title

to 5990 Robbs Drive, a declaratory judgment stating that Wells Fargo had no right

to foreclose on the 5990 Robbs Drive property, and injunctive relief setting aside the

wrongful foreclosure. The trial court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a

claim, and Shanyfelt appealed to this Court. Under Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec.

VI, Par. III, the Supreme Court has original appellate jurisdiction over cases

involving title to land. Moreover, on appeal, Shanyfelt specifically raises issues and

challenges the trial court’s ruling as it relates to his action to quiet title. Cf. Boyd v.

JohnGalt Holdings, LLC, 290 Ga. 658 (724 SE2d 395) (2012). Additionally, it

appears to us that the complaint was properly filed in the county where the disputed

land was located. Graham v. Tallent, 235 Ga. 47 (218 SE2d 799) (1975); Ga. Const.

of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. II. Because this appeal involvestitle to land, jurisdiction

appears to lie in the Supreme Court. See Tharp v. Harpagon Co., 278 Ga. 654, 655

(1) (604 SE2d 156) (2004). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby TRANSFERRED to

the Supreme Court for disposition.

July 22, 2015
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/22/2015