alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 01-14-00939-CR

MIREYA PATINO GARCIA § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

§

vs. § OF THE FIRST SUPREME

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS § JUDICIAL DISTRICT

CHADRICK S. HENDERSON’S MOTION 

TO SUBSTITUTE AS ATTORNEY IN CHARGE 

1. Chadrick S. Henderson asks this Court to allow him to substitute as attorney for Mireya 

Patino Garica. 

2. Chadrick S. Henderson will be substituted as attorney for Mireya Patino Garia. His 

information is as follows: 

Texas Bar No.: 00797854 

Address: POB 88323, Houston, TX 77288 

Telephone: (832) 209-1441 

Fax number: (832) 209-1380 

E-mail: chadhendersonlaw@yahoo.com 

3. Mireya Patino Garcia approves the withdrawal and substitution, which are not being done to 

delay this case. 

PRAYER 

4. For these reasons, Chadrick S. Henderson asks this Court to grant his motion to substitute as 

attorney for Mireya Patino Garcia.

Respectfully submitted, 

The Henderson Law Group 

POB 88323 

Houston, TX 77288

Tel: (832) 209-1441 

Fax: (832) 209-1380 

By: /s/ Chadrick S Henderson 

Chadrick S. Henderson 

State Bar No. 00797854 

Attorney for Appellant 

ACCEPTED

01-14-00939-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/27/2015 4:09:35 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/27/2015 4:09:35 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Certificate of Service

I certify that a true copy of the above was served on each attorney of record or party in 

accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on July 27, 2015.

/s/Chadrick S. Henderson

Chadrick S. Henderson

Attorney for Mireya Patino Garcia
NO. 01-14-00939-CR

MIREYA PATINO GARCIA § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

§

vs. § OF THE FIRST SUPREME

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS § JUDICIAL DISTRICT

ORDER ON CHADRICK S. HENDERSON’S MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE

After considering Chadrick S Henderson’s motion to substitute as attorney in charge, 

the Court GRANTS the motion and orders Joshua Willoughby withdrawn as attorney in charge 

for Mireya Patino Garcia

ORDERS that Chadrick S. Henderson be substituted as attorney in charge for Mireya 

Patino Garcia.

SIGNED on _______________, 20___.

__________________________________

PRESIDING JUDGE
[Cite as Jury v. Miller, 2015-Ohio-2998.]

STATE OF OHIO, BELMONT COUNTY 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

SEVENTH DISTRICT 

BRIAN JURY ) CASE NO. 15 BE 33 

) 

PETITIONER ) 

) 

VS. ) OPINION AND 

) JUDGMENT ENTRY 

MICHELE MILLER, WARDEN ) 

) 

RESPONDENT ) 

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 

JUDGMENT: Dismissed. 

APPEARANCES: 

For Petitioner: Brian Jury, Pro se 

#654-969 

Belmont Correctional Institution 

68518 Bannock Rd. 

P.O. Box 540 

St. Clairsville, Ohio 43950 

For Respondent: Atty. Mike DeWine 

Attorney General of Ohio 

Atty. Paul Kerridge 

Assistant Attorney General 

Criminal Justice Section 

150 East Gay Street, 16th Floor 

Columbus, Ohio 43215 

JUDGES: 

Hon. Mary DeGenaro 

Hon. Gene Donofrio 

Hon. Carol Ann Robb 

Dated: July 22, 2015
[Cite as Jury v. Miller, 2015-Ohio-2998.]

PER CURIAM. 

{¶1} On May 14, 2015, Petitioner Brian Jury filed a pro se “Habeas Corpus 

Petition by State Prisoner” claiming the Erie County Court of Common Pleas lacked 

jurisdiction because there was “never an initial charging instrument.” On May 29, 

2015, Respondent Michelle Miller, Warden of the Belmont Correctional Institution in 

Saint Clairsville, Ohio answered by filing a motion to dismiss. 

{¶2} Jury was convicted of kidnapping, felonious assault, and two counts of 

rape in July of 2014. The trial court sentenced Jury to thirty-six years imprisonment. 

On August 6, 2014, Jury filed a notice of appeal in the Sixth District Court of Appeals. 

This appeal is currently pending1. 

{¶3} Individuals who are “unlawfully restrained” may prosecute a writ of 

habeas corpus. R.C. 2725.01. Application is made by petition, which must contain 

certain information and enumerated items. R.C. 2725.04. If the court decides that 

the petition states a facially valid claim, it must allow the writ. R.C. 2725.06. 

However, “if the petition states a claim for which habeas corpus relief cannot be 

granted, the court should not allow the writ and should dismiss the petition.” Pegan 

v. Crawmer, 73 Ohio St.3d 607, 609, 1995-Ohio-175, 653 N.E.2d 659. 

{¶4} “Habeas corpus is not available to challenge either the validity or the 

sufficiency of an indictment.” (Internal citations omitted.) Luna v. Russell, 70 Ohio 

St.3d 561, 562, 1994-Ohio-264, 639 N.E.2d 1168. Jury possesses an adequate 

remedy, namely: to raise this issue in his pending direct appeal. State ex rel. 

 

1 On June 11, 2015, Jury filed a fourth motion for extension of time which has not been granted as of 

the time of drafting this entry.
-2-

Jackson v. Allen, 65 Ohio St.3d 37, 599 N.E.2d 696 (1992). As such, Jury's petition 

for writ of habeas corpus is hereby dismissed. Costs taxed against Petitioner. Final 

order. Clerk to serve notice on the parties as required by the Ohio Rules of Civil 

Procedure. 

DeGenaro, J., concurs. 

Donofrio, P.J., concurs. 

Robb, J., concurs.
36 Occupational Outlook Quarterly • Fall 2010

Does good news for temporary workers today suggest 

better news for all nonfarm workers tomorrow? Data 

on temporary help services employment from the U.S. 

Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) suggests that it does. 

These data—often viewed as an indicator of broad future 

employment trends—have been climbing steadily for 

much of the past year.

In times of economic uncertainty, firms are often 

hesitant to hire or fire permanent employees. Many businesses, therefore, first respond to changing demand for 

their goods or services in other ways. One method is to 

alter the length of the workweek of current employees. 

Another method, shown in the chart, is to increase or 

decrease the use of temporary workers.

Temporary help service companies provide temporary workers (also called temp workers, or temps) 

to their clients, usually as a supplement to the client’s 

permanent workforce. Temp workers are employees 

of the temporary help supplier and have no permanent 

T e m p o r a r y m e a s u r e s

relationship with the client. This flexible arrangement 

allows the client to quickly add or subtract workers in 

response to changing business conditions. At economic 

turning points, many businesses tend to increase or 

decrease their use of temps before they hire or terminate 

permanent employees. Thus, employment in the temporary help industry tends to lead total nonfarm employment, a measure used by economists to determine the 

economic health of a nation.

In recent cycles, as the chart shows, job losses in 

temporary employment began more than a year before 

those in total nonfarm employment. The lag during 

recoveries, however, has been much shorter, with gains in 

total nonfarm employment beginning just 3 or 4 months 

after those in the temp industry.

These data are from the Current Employment Statistics Survey. For more information, call (202) 691-6555 or 

visit online at www.bls.gov/ces.

120,000

122,000

124,000

126,000

128,000

130,000

132,000

134,000

136,000

138,000

140,000

1,600

1,800

2,000

2,200

2,400

2,600

2,800

1998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010

Temporary help services employment Total nonfarm employment

Temporary help services employment and total nonfarm employment, in thousands, 

seasonally adjusted, January 1998 through June 2010
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed the Quarterly Report of CastlePoint Holdings, Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by the Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented
in the Report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -
15(e) and 15d  15(e)) for the Company and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which the Report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in the Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the
Report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in the Report any change in the Companys internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys second quarter of 2008
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and to
the audit committee of the board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
 /s/ Michael H. Lee

Michael H. LeeChief Executive OfficerAugust 14, 2008
 48
# table201_q21_size
1

The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-3882

___________

Arbary Phillip Jackson, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Missouri Board of Probation and *

Parole, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: December 3, 2008

Filed: January 9, 2009

___________

Before MELLOY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Arbary Jackson appeals the district court’s1

 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint. Upon de novo review, see Union Elec. Co. v. Mo. Dept. of Conservation,

366 F.3d 655, 657 (8th Cir. 2004), we agree with the district court that Jackson’s

complaint was barred by sovereign immunity, see Board of Trs. of Univ. of Ala. v.

Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 363 (2001). Jackson’s pro se status does not excuse his failure

to name the proper parties, see Brown v. Frey, 806 F.3d 801, 804 (8th Cir. 1986) (pro
-2-

se litigants are not excused from complying with substantive and procedural law), and

we decline his request to remand this matter with instructions to allow amendment of

his complaint, see Artis v. Francis Howell N. Band Booster Ass’n, Inc., 161 F.3d

1178, 1182 (8th Cir. 1998) (denying request on appeal to amend complaint to name

defendant in his personal capacity where plaintiff had ample time to seek amendment

but failed to do so). Finally, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion

in denying Jackson’s motion for reconsideration. See United States v. Metro. St.

Louis Sewer Dist., 440 F.3d 930, 933 (8th Cir. 2006).

Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 1 of 22 PageID: 1084
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 2 of 22 PageID: 1085
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 3 of 22 PageID: 1086
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 4 of 22 PageID: 1087
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 5 of 22 PageID: 1088
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 6 of 22 PageID: 1089
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 7 of 22 PageID: 1090
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 8 of 22 PageID: 1091
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 9 of 22 PageID: 1092
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 10 of 22 PageID: 1093
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 11 of 22 PageID: 1094
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 12 of 22 PageID: 1095
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 13 of 22 PageID: 1096
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 14 of 22 PageID: 1097
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 15 of 22 PageID: 1098
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 16 of 22 PageID: 1099
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 17 of 22 PageID: 1100
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 18 of 22 PageID: 1101
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 19 of 22 PageID: 1102
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 20 of 22 PageID: 1103
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 21 of 22 PageID: 1104
Case 1:10-cv-06793-JHR-JS Document 64-1 Filed 08/16/12 Page 22 of 22 PageID: 1105
Order entered July 27, 2105

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01446-CV

IN RE XTO ENERGY INC., TIMBERLAND GATHERING & PROCESSING 

COMPANY, INC., AND BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Relators

Original Proceeding from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-00612

ORDER

Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Evans

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we CONDITIONALLY GRANT IN PART 

relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. We ORDER the trial judge, the Honorable Phyllis 

Lister Brown, to vacate her order of May 22, 2014 denying relators’ special exceptions and 

render an order granting relators’ special exceptions, dismissing Sandra G. Goebel’s claims 

against XTO Energy Inc. and Timberland Gathering & Processing Company, Inc., and ordering 

Sandra G. Goebel to replead her claims against Bank of America, N.A. Should the trial judge 

fail to comply with this order, the writ will issue. We ORDER the trial judge to file with this 

Court, within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, a certified copy of her order issued in 

compliance with this order.
We DENY relators’ petition for writ of mandamus to the extent it seeks dismissal of 

Sandra G. Goebel’s claims against Bank of America, N.A.

We ORDER relators, XTO Energy Inc., Timberland Gathering & Processing Company, 

Inc., and Bank of America , N.A. and the real party in interest, Sandra G. Goebel, to bear their 

own costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [MT-020-1010-PO] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior, Montana, Billings and Miles City Field Offices. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Eastern Montana Resource Advisory Council (RAC), will meet as indicated below. 

# DATES:

The next regular meeting of the Eastern Montana Resource Advisory Council will be held on March 4, 2009 in Billings, MT. The meetings will start at 8 a.m. and adjourn at approximately 3:30 p.m. When determined, the meeting location will be announced in a news release. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mark Jacobsen, Public Affairs Specialist, BLM Miles City Field Office, 111 Garryowen Road, Miles City, Montana, 59301. Telephone: (406) 233-2831. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The 15-member Council advises the Secretary of the Interior through the Bureau of Land Management on a variety of planning and management issues associated with public land management in Montana. At these meetings, topics will include: Miles City and Billings Field Office manager updates, subcommittee briefings, work sessions and other issues that the council may raise. All meetings are open to the public and the public may present written comments to the Council. Each formal Council meeting will also have time allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation, tour transportation or other reasonable accommodations should contact the BLM as provided above. 

Dated: January 15, 2009. 

M. Elaine Raper, 

Field Manager.

[FR Doc. E9-1595 Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. L .106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301. Related records can be viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 3705, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave, NW, Washington, D.C.

Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of no instruments of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument described below, for such purposes as this is intended to be used, that was being manufactured in the United States at the time of its order.

Docket Number: 09-022. Applicant: Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544. Instrument: SWAXS Dual 1D Position-Sensitive-Detector (PSD) System. Manufacturer: Hecus X-Ray System GmbH, Austria. Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 23393, May 19, 2009. Reasons: The instrument is unique, in that it is a dual system, which allows simultaneous acquisition of time resolved small-angle and wide-angle x-ray scattering data. Justification for Duty-Free Entry: We know of no instrument of the same general category suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in the United States at the time of order of each instrument

Dated: June 22, 2009.

Christopher Cassel,

Acting Director.

Subsidies Enforcement Office.

Import Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-15490 Filed 6-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,488
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,473
<INVENTORY>                                     73,651
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               142,589
<PP&E>                                          66,652
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,620
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          220,127
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           223
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,351)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,103
<SALES>                                        295,703
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               295,703
<CGS>                                          255,268
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,410
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,474
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (50,146)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (329)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (49,817)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,550)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (52,367)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.40)
        

</TABLE>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Robert Lee Trevino, * From the 385th District

 Court of Midland County,

 Trial Court No. CR39682.

Vs. No. 11-12-00231-CR * August 29, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.