alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 103 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 103

   To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of 
                                 Idaho.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 10, 2019

 Mr. Crapo (for himself and Mr. Risch) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of 
                                 Idaho.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT JUDGESHIP FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO.

    (a) In General.--The President shall appoint, by and with the 
advice and consent of the Senate, 1 additional district judge for the 
district of Idaho.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table in section 
133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking the item 
relating to Idaho 

              

and inserting the following:

``Idaho....................................................         3''.
 

                                 <all>
```
Order filed, July 22, 2015.

 In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

____________

NO. 01-15-00489-CR

LANCE JULIAN LAURA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case 1314922

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due June 30, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The 

record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed 

timely, we issue the following order.

We order Arlene Webb, the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record 
in this appeal, if any, within 30 days of the date of this order.

/s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Novamerican Steel Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated: July 15, 2008 |   | /s/*Corrado De Gasperis*                               |   |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | *Corrado De Gasperis*

*(Principal Executive Officer)* |   |
|                 |   |                                                   |   |
| Dated: July 15, 2008 |   | /s/*Corrado De Gasperis*                               |   |
|                 |   | *Corrado De Gasperis*

*(Principal Financial Officer)* |   |

 

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and will not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Affinion Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Todd H. Siegel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: July 31, 2009                                               
|                                                                   
|/s/ Todd H. Siegel                                                 
|Todd H. Siegel Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of SRKP 10, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
      C. PintsopoulosPrincipal
      Financial OfficerApril
      21, 2010
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.1    
  


NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF

FLORIDA  



	NUMBER	 	 	 	SHARES





	2727	PHAGE THERAPEUTICS



INTERNATIONAL, INC.


 AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK: 50,000,000 SHARES—PAR VALUE: $.001	CUSIP NO. 717100 20 0





 
 



	THIS CERTIFIES THAT	 	SPECIMEN
	
IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF	
 	

 



Shares of PHAGE THERAPEUTICS INTERNATIONAL, INC. Common Stock

transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate

properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. 


Witness
the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. 


Dated:




	 	 	[SEAL]	 	 
	
 SECRETARY	 	 	 	
 PRESIDENT







	INTERWEST TRANSFER CO. INC.
 P.O. BOX 17136/SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84117	COUNTERSIGNED & REGISTERED	 
	 	 	
 COUNTERSIGNED Transfer Agent-Authorized Signature









	NOTICE:	 	Signature must be guaranteed by a firm which is a member of a registered national stock exchange, or by a bank (other than a saving bank), or a trust company. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the
face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations.
	

TEN COM	
 	

—	

as tenants in common	
 	

UNIF GIFT MIN ACT—	

 	

Custodian	

 
	TEN ENT	 	—	as tenants by the entireties	 	 	
	 	

	JT TEN	 	—	as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common	 	 	(Cust)	 	(Minor)
	 	 	 	 	 	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act
	

 	
 	

 	

 	
 	

 	

 (State)
	

 	
 	

 	

 	
 	

Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list



For Value Received,                hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 



	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE	 	 
	
	 	 
	

	
 	

 





 
 



	
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OR ASSIGNEE)
	


	


	

	
 	

Shares
	

of the capital stock represented by the within certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint	
 	

 
	

	
 	

Attorney
	

to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.







	Dated	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
	 	 





 
 



	 	 	

	 	 	NOTICE:	 	THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER



SPECIMEN  









QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.1
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 22.1
 
                            SUBSIDIARIES OF WESTCORP
 
Western Financial Bank, a Federal Savings Bank
WFS Financial Inc, a California corporation
WFS Financial Auto Loans, Inc., a California corporation
WFS Financial Auto Loans 2, Inc., a California corporation
WFS Investments, Inc., a California corporation
Western Consumer Services, Inc., a California corporation
WestFin Insurance Agency, Inc., a California corporation
Western Reconveyance Company, Inc., a California corporation
WestFin Securities Corporation, a California corporation
Westhrift Life Insurance Company, an Arizona corporation
Westran Services Corp., a California corporation
Westcorp Investments, Inc., a California corporation
The Hammond Company, The Mortgage Bankers, a California corporation
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 16, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 16, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0469. CITY OF DUNWOODY, GEORGIA v. DISCOVERY PRACTICE

MANAGEMENT, INC., d/b/a CENTER FOR DISCOVERY et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

14CV10019
----

|   | VAIL      RESORTS, INC. |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | By:                                                              | /s/      Jeffrey W. Jones |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|
|   | Name:       Jeffrey W. Jones                                |
|   | Title:  Senior      Executive Vice President and Chief |
|   | Financial      Officer                                           |

|   | GUARANTORS: |
|--------|-------------|

|   | By:                                                        | /s/      Jeffrey W. Jones |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|
|   | Name:       Jeffrey W. Jones                          |
|   | Title:  Senior      Executive Vice President and |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer of each Guarantor listedabove |

|   | By:                                                        | /s/      Jeffrey W. Jones |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|
|   | Name:       Jeffrey W. Jones                          |
|   | Title:  Senior      Executive Vice President and |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer                               |

|   | TRUSTEE: |
|--------|----------|

|   | THE      BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., as  Trustee |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:                                      | /s/      Alex Briffett |
|--------|------------------------------------------|------------------------|
|   | Name:       John A. (Alex) Briffett |
|   | Title:  Senior      Associate  |
<PAGE>


                              Exhibit 23.1

                      INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in post-effective Amendment No. 
1 to Registration Statement No. 33-7053 on Form S-8 and in Registration 
Statement No. 33-44700 on Form S-8 of our report Dated December 23, 1998 
(which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph 
relating to Santa Fe Gaming Corporation's ability to continue as a going 
concern) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santa Fe Gaming 
Corporation for the year ended September 30, 1998.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Las Vegas, Nevada
December 28, 1998


                                   72
Case 3:11-cr-00043-JAP   Document 17   Filed 05/20/11   Page 1 of 1 PageID: 34
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6334

GARY CLYDE KEEVER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HERB JACKSON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief 

District Judge. (3:14-cv-00641-FDW)

Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: July 27, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary Clyde Keever, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gary Clyde Keever seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order 

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Keever has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Robert G. Costantini, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ORBCOMM Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 14, 2007         /s/ Robert G. Costantini  Name:  Robert G. Costantini   Title:  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.55

                              DJ ORTHOPEDICS, INC.
                                2985 Scott Street
                                 Vista, CA 92083




                                          November 20, 2001


Cyril Talbot III
2511 Lozana Road
Del Mar, CA 92014

                           NOTES AND PLEDGE AGREEMENTS

Dear Cy:

                  Reference is hereby made to the following: (i) a Promissory
Note originally issued by you to DonJoy, L.L.C. (the "COMPANY") on June 30,
1999, and amended and restated on June 28, 2000, in the original principal
amount, as so amended and restated, of $210,541.11, (the "JUNE 1999 NOTE"); (ii)
a Promissory Note issued by you to the Company on June 28, 2000, in the original
principal amount of $17,728.91 (the "JUNE 2000 Note"); (iii) a Promissory Note
issued by you to the Company on July 7, 2000, in the original principal amount
of $24,924.67 (the "JULY 2000 NOTE"); (iv) a Promissory Note originally issued
by you to the Company on June 11, 2001, in the original principal amount of
$30,121.74 (the "JUNE 2001 NOTE" and collectively with the June 1999 Note, the
June 2000 Note and the July 2000 Note, the "NOTES"); (v) a Third Amended and
Restated Pledge Agreement between you and the Company, dated as of June 11, 2001
(the "PLEDGE AGREEMENT") and (vi) the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "MERGER
AGREEMENT"), dated as of October 26, 2001, among dj Orthopedics, Inc. (the
"PARENT"), the Company, and DJ Acquisition Corporation, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Parent (the "MERGER SUB").

                  You hereby acknowledge that pursuant to Merger Agreement (i)
the Merger Sub was merged with and into the Company and the previous holders of
units of the Company received shares of the Parent Common Stock (as defined in
the Merger Agreement) in exchange for their units of the Company and (ii) the
Company assigned all of its right, title and interest in and to, and the Parent
assumed all of the Company's obligations under the Notes and the Pledge
Agreement. Accordingly, you hereby acknowledge that: (i) all references to the
Payee in the Notes shall refer to the Parent; (ii) all references to the Company
in the Pledge Agreement shall refer to the Parent; and (iii) all references to
"Pledged Securities" in the Pledge Agreement shall refer to the Parent Common
Stock that was issued to you pursuant to the Merger Agreement.

<Page>

                  Please acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing by
signing a copy of this letter where indicated.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        DJ ORTHOPEDICS, INC.

                                        By: /s/ Leslie H. Cross
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Leslie H. Cross
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


ACKNOWLEDGED AS OF
NOVEMBER 20, 2001:

/s/ Cyril Talbot III
--------------------
Cyril Talbot III
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40601 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EDUARDO PEREZ, SR., also known as Edwardo Perez, also known as Edward Jenks Perez, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-97-C-165-1

- - - - - - - - - - June 16, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: 1 Irma M. Sanjines, court-appointed counsel for Eduardo Perez, Sr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Perez did not file a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from furtherNo. -2-

1 The motion of Albert A. Pena, III, to withdraw his Anders brief is also GRANTED. responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 1