alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SAXTON v. GENERAL MILLS, Inc.

Civ. No. 25996.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

Feb. 9, 1949.

*77Sindell & Sindell, of Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

McKeehan, Merrick, Arter & Stewart and Sumner Canary, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant.

JONES, Chief Judge.

By special appearance the defendant moves the Court to quash the service of summons on defendant’s local manager of the grocery products division of the defendant, contending that the purported service does not conform to the requirements of Rule 4(d) (3), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

The affidavit of Duane Curtiss in support of the motion states that he supervises approximately twenty-five salesmen in this territory, together with approximately five office employes; that he is manager of the grocery products division of General Mills, Inc., the defendant, with offices in the Hanna Building, Cleveland, Ohio; that no funds of the defendant are deposited in this district under his supervision and that orders taken through the local office which he supervises are final, with some exceptions, and payment for orders is made at other places than this district.

On the basis óf Rule 4(d) (3) and 4(d) (7) and the method of service provided by state law, which is the additional method provided by Rule 4(d) (7), it would seem to me that the affiant Curtiss, upon whom summons was served, was to all intents and purposes “a managing agent” of the corporation even though he did not 'handle money or pay the office expenses here.

The principal business of the company, ‘ as I understand it, is the sale and distribution of merchandise throughout this territory, — Ohio and adjoining states. Of this chief function the affiant Curtiss has supervision in this District. The defendant, General Mills, Inc., undoubtedly does an extensive business in this jurisdiction and a corporation engaging so extensively in business within a state and district should be amenable to process through a ranking representative such as Curtiss. In other words, a liberal interpretation is justified where service on foreign corporations doing a continuous and extensive business within the state is brought into question.

Motion to quash denied.
# covid_table23_c20_state
# table196_q20_naics
United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee

AND

COMPUSEARCH SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________ 

2012-5129

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 12-CV-274, Judge George W. Miller.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

THOMAS A. COULTER, LeClairRyan, a Professional 

Corporation, of Richmond, Virginia, argued for plaintiffappellant. 

DANIEL G. KIM, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation 

Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of 

Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-
appellee, United States. With him on the brief were 

STUART F. DELERY, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney 

General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, and KENNETH M.

DINTZER, Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief were 

DAVID R. KOEPPEL, DENNIS ADELSON and COLIN W.

O’SULLIVAN, Attorneys, Office of the Solicitor, United 

States Department of Labor, of Washington, DC. 

 DAVID S. COHEN, Cohen Mohr LLP, of Washington, 

DC, argued for defendant-appellee, Compusearch Software Systems, Inc. Of counsel were GABRIEL EDWARD 

KENNON and JOHN J. O’BRIEN. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PLAGER, and PROST, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 

March 28, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Date Jan Horbaly

 Clerk
R-C^ f^se^ ^^^-go^o-cR

& Trial£c*rt &S--&&~cf& 7y^l "C/i.

fife. Ls>K. 7'2-(~/S

A2?k/*7 •r

/?/ nxccAs t y#cr *><-£,>.& t>> Mil/A ^ -ikeres £07^\

ftfaa

b^

*// ^Z h*v& /jS IfO^. ct_hces^& do^jn Mae 1*is,

Vol 9l Coy\-hti~aS Hp>*4<?S

V*"! 3 rg/7-^M5 VJL pr^^gS

BS-C'D IN COURT QFAPPF.ALS

12th Court of Appeals Distri A

Your CttcrAs. are s^Yia^ Vcl >> cc/rhtJAS £S ?3;pi-t&se /i*u-& 5«>^^/

^5 f&r S&7.ps?£s, "Jher€S, &/ili J?Q -hkt/ #>*rJ

*. ^Aci ihnr ^k*f 3^3 +#7HAq You /-S rc-cr^tr-, X *s*Jk sAarcfd /&&*<&?

j& \s^*lS- &u&r~^A*r* in*e<i

JC ssosco/d apprAilrtte ?c*,r *h/'«e fd Ae/P /s\ -1h?S /*r**J&f, Tfart/L/^cSi
Order entered May 13, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 22

- 00158

- CV

KELLY M. LIEBBE , ET AL. , Appellant s

V.

STEPHEN COURTNEY, M.D. , ET AL. , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296

- 03470

- 2016

O RDER

Before the Court is the May 12, 2022 request of Janet Dugger, Official Court

Reporter for the 296th Judicial District Court, for an extension of time to file the

reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and extend the time to June 13, 2022

.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TARA JONES, No. 68306

Appellant, |

vs.

MICHAEL ALLEN ROBERTS,

Respondent. FI L E D
JUL 27 205

TRACIE K. LINDEMAN
CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
‘\

DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This appeal was docketed in this court on June 26, 2015,

without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same day a notice was
issued directing appellant to pay the filing fee within ten days. The notice
further advised that failure to pay the filing fee within ten days would
result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the
filing fee.or otherwise responded to this court’s notice. Accordingly, cause
appearing, this appeal is dismissed.

It is so ORDERED.

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT
TRACIE K. LINDEMAN

py: Moou 2 Wd

ce: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge
The Firm, P.C.
Ranalli & Zaniel, LLC/Henderson
Eighth District Court Clerk

SuPREME COURT
OF
Nevapa

CLERK'S ORDER

(01987 Be : 15-2264 _|
Exhibit 31.2

I, Andrew J. Norstrud, certify that:

   1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Stem Cell Therapy
International, Inc.

     2.   Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a  material  fact  or  omit to  state  a  material  fact necessary
to make the statements  made, in light of circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the condensed consolidated financial
statements, and other financial information  included in this report,  fairly
present in all material respects the consolidated financial condition,
consolidated results of operations and consolidated cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.   The small business issuer's  other certifying  officers and I are
responsible for establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange  Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

          a)   designed such  disclosure  controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, included
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

          c)   disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting; and

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent  evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting,  to the small business issuer's  auditors and the audit
committee  of  small business issuer's  board  of  directors  (or  persons
performing the equivalent functions):

          a)   all  significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design  or  operation  of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process,  summarize and report financial information; and

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.



/s/Andrew J. Norstrud       Chief Financial Officer and Chief
---------------------       ---------------------------------
Accounting Officer          November 19, 2007
------------------          -----------------
EXHIBIT 32
 
 Certification of Periodic Financial Report
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Criticare Systems, Inc. (the Company) certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date: September 29, 2003                                /s/ Emil H. Soika
 _______________________
 Emil H. Soika,
 Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 Date: September 29, 2003                                /s/ Michael J. Sallmann
  Michael J. Sallmann,
 Vice President  Finance
 
 
 
 This Certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 2, 2020

No. 04-20-00412-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.A.C., A.I.A.C, S.A.C., H.A.C., CHILDREN,

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019PA00887

Honorable Linda A. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights, 

which must be disposed of by this Court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. 

TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. The reporter’s record was due on August 28, 2020, ten days after the 

notice of appeal was filed in the trial court. The court reporter has filed a notification of late 

record, requesting an additional ten days to file the record. We GRANT the request and ORDER 

the court reporter to file the reporter’s record on or before September 12, 2020. 

Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, requests for 

extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of September, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kingston Systems Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George J. Coupe, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                           KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.

                                       By: /s/ George J. Coupe
                                           -------------------------------
                                           George J. Coupe
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           July 16, 2007
# table79_q10.2_naics
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00328-CR

Jason Lee Moreland, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

NO. 04-2412-2, HONORABLE TIMOTHY L. WRIGHT, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

After his motion to suppress evidence was overruled, appellant Jason Lee Moreland

pleaded guilty to possessing less than two ounces of marihuana. See Tex. Health & Safety Code

Ann. § 481.121 (West 2003). As called for in a plea bargain agreement, the court deferred

adjudication and placed appellant on community supervision. 

In his sole point of error, appellant contends that the warrant to search his residence

was issued without probable cause. He relies on the opinions of this Court in Davila v. State, 169

S.W.3d 735 (Tex. App.—Austin 2005, no pet.), and Serrano v. State, 123 S.W.3d 53 (Tex.

App.—Austin 2003, pet. ref’d). The State confesses error. The point of error is sustained.
2

The deferred adjudication order is reversed and the cause is remanded to the county

court at law. On the State’s motion, the Court’s mandate shall issue immediately. See Tex. R. App.

P. 18.1(c). 

__________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Reversed and Remanded

Filed: December 15, 2005

Do Not Publish
H. Res. 954 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 8, 2020. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM: Mr. Mfume 

(to rank immediately after Mr. Rouda). 

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Mfume (to rank 

immediately after Ms. Davids of Kansas). 

Attest: 

Clerk.
TDCI Offender Details ‘ Page 1 of 2

_ | 49,25-08
oem gy eine

Offender Information Details
Return to Search list

SID Number: 02567593

TDCJ Number: 01799939
“Name: BROWN,ROBERT

Race: B

Gender: M

DOB: 1955-01-05

Maximum Sentence Date: 2025-04-14

Current Facility: SANDERS ESTES

Projected Release Date: 2017-08-06

Parole Eligibility Date: 2013-09-12

Offender Visitation Eligible: YES

Information provided is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times per day
on visitation days. Because this information is subject to change, family members and
friends are encouraged to call the unit prior to traveling for a visit.

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE:

Scheduled Release Date: Offender is not scheduled for release at this time.
Scheduled Release Type: Will be determined when release date is scheduled.
Scheduled Release Location: Will be determined when release date is scheduled.
- Parole Review Information ~
Offense History:
Offense Sentence Sentence (YY-
Date Offense Date County Case No. MM-DD)
T I I I T

http://offender.tdcj.texas.gov/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=02567593 7/28/2015
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

PATRICK SHANE WELCH,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-14-00116-CR 

Appeal from the

97th Judicial District Court 

of Clay County, Texas 

(TC# 2012-0053C-CR) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

PLATINUM HOSPITALITY GROUP, 

LLC, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Civ. No. 10-6454 (WJM) 

 

ORDER 

 A Report and Recommendation was filed on September 20, 2011 

recommending that Defendants’ answer be stricken and default entered. The 

parties were notified that they had fourteen (14) days to submit objections and 

responses to the Report and Recommendation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 

72.1(c)(2). No objection or response having been received by this Court, and the 

Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo, and good cause 

appearing; 

IT IS on this 6th day of October 2011, hereby, 

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mark 

Falk is adopted as the Opinion of this Court; and it is further 

ORDERED that Defendants’ answer be stricken; and it is further 

Case 2:10-cv-06454-WJM-MF Document 33 Filed 10/06/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 293
2 

ORDERED that default be entered against Defendants. 

 /s/ William J. Martini 

 WILLIAM J. MARTINI, U.S.D.J. 

cc: The Hon. Mark Falk, U.S.M.J. 

Case 2:10-cv-06454-WJM-MF Document 33 Filed 10/06/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 294
UNANIMOUS
WRITTEN CONSENT


OF
THE DIRECTORS OF


ATWOOD
MINERALS & MINING CORP.


A
Nevada Corporation




The
undersigned, being all of the directors of Atwood Minerals & Mining Corp., a
Nevada corporation (the “Corporation”), hereby adopt
the following recitals and resolutions by their written consent thereto,
effective as of October 12, 2009, hereby waiving all notice of and the holding
of a meeting of the directors to act upon such resolutions.




AMENDMENT TO
BLYAWS




RESOLVED,
that in accordance with Article X, Section 2, the board of directors hereby
amends the Article II, Section 1(a) of the Corporations bylaws by deleting the
word “shareholders” in the second sentence therein and inserting “Board of
Directors” in lieu thereof




RESOLVED
FURTHER, that the appropriate officers of the Corporation be, and they hereby
are, authorized and empowered to execute such documents, take such steps and
perform such acts as, in their judgment, may be necessary or convenient to
carrying out the foregoing resolutions and that any such documents executed or
acts taken by them shall be conclusive evidence of authority in so
doing.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Unanimous Written Consent as
of the date first written above.







/s/
      Greg GoldbergGreg
      Goldberg
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alamo Energy Corp. a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Allan Millmaker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Alamo Energy Corp., and will be retained by Alamo Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Allan MillmakerAllan Millmaker

Chief Executive Officer, President, and a director (Principal Executive Officer)

September 12, 2012





1
# covid_table12_q4_size_class
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

--------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gold Holdings Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Demitro Marianovich, Principle Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|Registrant          | Gold Holdings Corporation                                                         
|------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |                                                                                   
|                    | By:  /s/ Demitro Marianovich                                                      
|                    |                                                                                   
|                    | Demitro Marianovich                                                               
|                    | Chief Executive Officer (Principle Executive Officer, Principle Financial Officer)
|                    |                                                                                   
|Date:  May 13, 2010 |
#### Juan Carlos Araujo, Respondent, v Juan Carlos Perez Aviles, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 317]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated September 23, 2005, which denied his motion to vacate a judgment dated December 17, 2004, entered upon his default in answering the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant’s sole contention on this appeal is that the plaintiff’s noncompliance with the requirement of CPLR 3215 (f) rendered the ensuing default judgment a “nullity” and excused the defendant’s default in answering the complaint. We disagree.

Even if the plaintiff failed to comply with CPLR 3215 (f), which requires a party seeking a default judgment to file, inter alia, “proof by affidavit made by the party of the facts constituting the claim, the default and the amount due,” such noncompliance would not warrant excusing the defendant’s default or permitting him to interpose a late answer.

Had the defendant opposed the plaintiffs motion for leave to enter a default judgment on this sole ground, and if the objection under CPLR 3215 (f) had merit, a point we need not decide, the motion would have properly been denied with leave to the plaintiff to renew on proper papers *(see Matone v Sycamore Realty Corp.,*31 AD3d 721 [2006]; *Blam v Netcher,*17 AD3d 495, 496 [2005]; *Hazim v Winter,*234 AD2d 422 [1996]). This alleged defect would not render the default judgment a nullity nor, in the absence of a reasonable excuse and meritorious defense, entitle the defendant to vacatur of his default *(see Coulter v Town of Highlands,*26 AD3d 456 [2006]; *Harkless v Reid,*23 AD3d 622 [2005]). Crane, J.E, Ritter, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

MICHAEL LEVANT JOHNSON, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

SUPERIOR COURT OF 

PENNSYLVANIA, AND THE CHESTER 

COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS,

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 87 MM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary 

Relief is DENIED.