alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 21

Parent and Subsidiaries

UST Inc. is an independent corporation without parent. It had
the following significant subsidiaries as of December 31,
2004:

|                                      |                                                              |                 |          |               |  |  |     |     |  
|------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------- | -------- | ------------- |  |  | --- | --- | -
|                                      |                                                              |                 |          | Percentage of
|                                      |                                                              |                 |          | Ownership by 
|                                      |                                                              | Jurisdiction of |          | UST or its   
|                                      |                                                              | Incorporation   |          | Wholly Owned 
|Name of Subsidiary or Affiliate       |                                                              | or Registration |          | Subsidiaries 
|                                      |                                                              |                 |          |              
|International Wine & Spirits
    Ltd. |                                                              |                 | Delaware |               |  |  | 100 | %  
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                      | Ste. Michelle Wine Estates Ltd.                              |                 |          | Washington    |  |  |     | 100 | %
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company        |                                                              |                 | Delaware |               |  |  | 100 | %  
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                      | U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Manufacturing Limited
    Partnership |                 |          | Delaware      |  |  |     | 100 | %
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                      | U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Brands
    Inc.                       |                 |          | Delaware      |  |  |     | 100 | %

Certain subsidiaries have been omitted since, if considered in
the aggregate as a single subsidiary, they would not constitute
a significant subsidiary.
#### In the Matter of Shacora D., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 536]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Monica Drinane, J.), entered on or about July 21, 2005, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the second degree and menacing in the third degree, and placed her with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations regarding credibility *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]).

The placement was a proper exercise of the court’s discretion that constituted the least restrictive alternative consistent with the needs of respondent and the community *(see Matter of Katherine*W, 62 NY2d 947 [1984]), particularly in view of her prior juvenile delinquency adjudication and the apparent inability of her mother to control her in the community. Concur—Tom, J.E, Saxe, Friedman, Sullivan and McGuire, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          56,303
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  561,632<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,357<F2>
<INVENTORY>                                     59,109
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               716,592
<PP&E>                                       1,771,010
<DEPRECIATION>                                 581,025
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,506,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          551,545
<BONDS>                                        988,909
<COMMON>                                        10,262
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     810,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,506,461
<SALES>                                      3,228,553
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,242,781
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,960,832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               203,858
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F3>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              84,245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,154)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,969
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,123)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,123)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.16)
<FN>
<F1>Excludes $46,868 of long-term notes receivable.
<F2>Excludes $4,953 of allowance for long-term notes receivable.
<F3>Included in Total costs and expenses line.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
@article{105521,
  author = {Timothy Foecke and Mark Iadicola and Stephen Banovic},
  title = {A Method for Direct Measurement of Multiaxial Stress-Strain Curves in Sheet Metal},
  year = {2007},
  number = {38A},
  month = {2007-02-01},
  publisher = {Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A-Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science},
  language = {en},
}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6724

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JASON OLEEN BROOKS, a/k/a Oleen Jason Brooks,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CR-93-4-P, CA-98-186-P-3)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 5, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason Oleen Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Patrice Pearlette Lewis,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jason Oleen Brooks seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Brooks, Nos. CR-93-4-

P; CA-98-186-P-3 (W.D.N.C. May 4, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# covid_table63_c75_size_class
Exhibit 10.9


 


Amendment Number 1


to the


Scholastic Corporation


2001 Stock Incentive
Plan


(Amended and Restated
as of July 21, 2009)


 


1. The following
amendments are made effective as of May 21, 2013 to the Scholastic Corporation 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (Amended and
Restated as of July 21, 2009) (“Plan”):


 


(a) Article VI of the
Plan is amended by adding new Section 6.3(h) as follows:


 


“(h) AUTOMATIC EXERCISE. The Plan administrator
may provide in a Stock Option Agreement or otherwise that any Stock Option outstanding on the last business day of the term of
such Stock Option (“Automatic Exercise Date”) that has a “Specified Minimum Value” shall be automatically and
without further action by the Participant (or in the event of the Participant’s death, the Participant’s personal representative
or estate) be exercised on the Automatic Exercise Date. Payment of the grant price of such Stock Option may be made pursuant to
such procedures as may be approved by the Plan administrator from time to time and the Company shall deduct or withhold an amount
sufficient to satisfy all taxes associated with such exercise in accordance with Section 13.4. For purposes of this Section 6.3(h),
the term “Specified Minimum Value” means that the Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock exceeds the exercise price
of a share subject to an expiring Stock Option by at least $0.50 cents per share or such other amount as the Plan administrator
shall determine from time to time. The Plan administrator may elect to discontinue the automatic exercise of Stock Options pursuant
to this Section 6.3(h) at any time upon notice to a Participant. The automatic exercise of a Stock Option pursuant to this Section
6.3(h) shall apply only to a Stock Option Award that has been timely accepted by a Participant under procedures specified by the
Plan administrator from time to time.”


 


2. Except as specifically amended by the
foregoing, the Plan remains in full force and effect in accordance with the terms thereof prior to such amendment.


 


3. The foregoing
amendment was duly approved by resolution of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of
Scholastic Corporation at its meeting held on May 21, 2013 and shall become effective on May 21, 2013.
# covid_table22_c20_naics
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 964 

Establishing a whistleblower hotline for purposes of reporting waste, fraud, 

abuse, or mismanagement of taxpayer funds to the Select Subcommittee 

on the Coronavirus Crisis. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2020 

Mr. CORREA (for himself, Mr. CISNEROS, Mr. CASTRO of Texas, Ms. MOORE, 

Mr. GONZALEZ of Texas, Mr. VARGAS, Mr. CASE, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Ms. 

JACKSON LEE, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. PHILLIPS, Mr. COSTA, and Mrs. 

DINGELL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Establishing a whistleblower hotline for purposes of reporting 

waste, fraud, abuse, or mismanagement of taxpayer 

funds to the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus 

Crisis. 

1 Resolved, That in carrying out the duties prescribed 

2 under House Resolution 935 (agreed to on April 23, 

3 2020), the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis 

4 shall, in consultation with the Office of the Whistleblower 

5 Ombudsman of the House of Representatives, establish a 

6 hotline for the purposes of individuals reporting (via tele7 phone or other electronic communication) waste, fraud, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 964 IH 

1 abuse, or mismanagement of taxpayer funds appropriated 

2 to address the coronavirus crisis. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ William J. HoranWilliam J. Horan, Chairman, President and Director(Principal Executive Officer)Dated:  November 16, 2009
<Page>


                          [FORM OF FACE OF CERTIFICATE]



                 Organized Under the Laws of the State of Kansas


                                                           CLASS B CAPITAL UNITS

B-

                          WESTERN PLAINS ENERGY, L.L.C.

THIS CERTIFIES THAT___________________________________________ IS THE OWNER AND
REGISTERED HOLDER OF_____________________________________ CLASS B CAPITAL UNITS

                        in Western Plains Energy, L.L.C.

TRANSFERABLE ONLY ON THE BOOKS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BY THE HOLDER
HEREOF IN PERSON OR BY DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY UPON SURRENDER OF THIS
CERTIFICATE PROPERLY ENDORSED.

              IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE SAID LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY HAS CAUSED
              THIS CERTIFICATE TO BE SIGNED BY ITS DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS THIS
              ____ DAY OF_________ , 200__.




           -----------------------                ------------------------
                  SECRETARY                               PRESIDENT


<Page>



                        [FORM OF REVERSE OF CERTIFICATE]

             The sale and transfer of the Capital Units represented
             by this Certificate are restricted by, and subject to,
             the provisions of the Operating Agreement of Western
             Plains Energy, L.L.C. The Operating Agreement provides,
             among other things, that no sale, assignment, transfer,
             gift, exchange or other disposition of these Capital
             Units is valid except as specifically provided for in
             the Operating Agreement. Copies of the Operating
             Agreement and instructions for transfer, sale or other
             disposition of these Capital Units are available for
             inspection at the Company's principal office.




FOR VALUE RECEIVED __________ HEREBY SELL, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER
UNTO__________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________ CAPITAL UNITS REPRESENTED
BY THE WITHIN CERTIFICATE, AND DO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT
__________________ ____________________________________________________ ATTORNEY
TO TRANSFER THE SAID CAPITAL UNITS ON THE BOOKS OF THE WITHIN NAMED LIMITED
LIABILITY COMPANY WITH FULL POWER OF SUBSTITUTION IN THE PREMISES.
DATED ____________________, 20_____ ____________________________________

IN PRESENCE OF ________________________________________________________________

NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS
WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT
ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 16, 2020

Order 

Clerk

November 16, 2020

162218(3)

STACY ERWIN OAKES, 

Plaintiff,

v SC: 162218

30TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT and 

INGHAM COUNTY CLERK, 

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff to waive the filing fees is 

GRANTED as to this case only.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

 

WHOLEHEALTH PRODUCTS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wholehealth Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period  ended November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Arcaro, Principal  Executive  Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Joseph Arcaro and will be retained by Wholehealth Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 Dated: October 5, 2012

 

By: /s/ Joseph Arcaro

Joseph Arcaro

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

EXHIBIT 32.2

 

 

WHOLEHEALTH PRODUCTS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wholehealth Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q  for the period  ended November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Arcaro, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Joseph Arcaro and will be retained by Wholehealth Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

Dated: October 5, 2012

By: /s/ Joseph Arcaro

Joseph Arcaro 

Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Rail Employer Reporting Instructions

Part VIII - Employer Reporting System (ERS) Internet User Instructions

Chapter 5: Informational Notices to Employers (RESERVED)

1

This space is RESERVED for the future publication of Informational Notices to Employers in 

the Employer Reporting System (ERSNet) Internet User Instructions.
Exhibit 32.1

CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, the undersigned officer of Westway Group, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



/s/ James B. JenkinsName:

James B. JenkinsTitle:

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Director


Dated: May 16, 2011
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James F. Cahill, III, Appellant.

[977 NYS2d 664]

Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied. Present — Scudder, EJ., Smith, Fahey, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.
# table92_q11.3_state
FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUL 2 2 2015

Abel Acosta, Cierk

IN THE TEXAS COURT

OF CRIMINAL APPEAL

ASUTIN,TEXAS

CLIFTON DEAN MONTGOMERY,Jr.,Appellant

^RECEIVED

v '•'"•^OFCRWAL"" V •

JUL 2 2 2015 THE STATE OF TEXAS

TRAIL COURT NO.12-01245-CRF-272

APPEAL NO.10-13-00298-CR

'Abe! Acosta, Clerk

PRO SE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

Comes now Respectfully,CLIFTON DEAN MONTGOMERY,Appellant in the

above style and number cause whom are proceeding pro se files

and submit this his Pro se Motion For Extension of Time to

File Petition For Discretionary Review,and in support,the Appellent will show:

1. )The.r.style and number of this case in the Tenth District court

of Appeals Waco,Texas is; CLIFTON DEAN MONTGOMERY V. THE STATE

OF TEXAS Appeal no.10-13-00298-CR.

2).The style and number of the case in the trial court is: THE

STATE OF TEXAS V.CLIFTON DEAN MONTGOMERY Cause No. 12-01245-

CRF-272 Brazos County,Texas .

3).The conviction was affirmed juyl 3,2015.

4)The deadline for filing Appellant's Petition For Discretionary

Review is August 3,2015.

5). An extension of time for a period of sixty(60) days is re

quested that would make the date due, October 3,2015.

6). No prior requet for an extension of time has been made.

7). The facts relied upon to show good cause for the requested

entension are,as follows: The Appellant was represented by court

appointed attorney during the appeal and after the appeal was

affirmed the Appellant has to file rehearing pro se as well

as Petition For Discretionary Review.
WHEREFORE,PREMISES CONSIDERED,the Appellant respectfully request

this Honorable Court to extend time for filing Petition For

Discretionary Review in this cause until October 3,2015.

ON THIS THE DAY OF ,2015

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,,

CLIFTON DEAN MONTGOMERY

#1874480 Polunsky Unit

3872 FM 350 South

Livingston,Texas 77351
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Globalink, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Robin Young
                                 ----------------------
                                 Robin Young
                                 Chief Executive Officer

November 18, 2010

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Globalink, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Ben Choi
                                 ----------------------
                                 Ben Choi
                                 Chief Executive Officer

November 18, 2010
##### 



(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the
Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Jerome B. EisenbergJerome B. EisenbergChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)