alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLNM920000 L13100000 FI0000; NMNM-96574]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease.

# SUMMARY:

Under the Class II provisions of Title IV, Public Law 97-451, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease NMNM 96574 from the lessee, OXY USA, Inc., for lands in Lea County, New Mexico. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Margie Dupre, Bureau of Land Management, New Mexico State Office, P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502 or at (505) 438-7520.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    No valid lease has been issued that affects the lands. The lessee agrees to new lease terms for rentals and royalties of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year, and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee paid the required $500.00 administrative fee for the reinstatement of the lease and $166.00 cost for publishing this Notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    . The lessee met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). We are proposing to reinstate lease NMNM 96574, effective the date of termination, October 1, 2008, under the original terms and conditions                           ( print page 31749)                        of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.                

Margie Dupre,

Land Law Examiner, Fluids Adjudication Team.

[FR Doc. E9-15655 Filed 7-1-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
#### Judith May, Appellant, v Lorenzo Scotto-D’Abusco, Respondent.

Submitted December 17, 2012;

decided February 12, 2013

*1032Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain this motion for leave to appeal from the order of the Appellate Division entered in this action commenced in the Civil Court of the City of New York *(see*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [7]; CPLR 5602).

Judge Rivera taking no part.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew Couvell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of Green Irons Holdings Corp. for the period ended January 31, 2007;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e))for the registrant and
have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition Rules contained in SEC
release No. 33-8238;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: July 30, 2007


By: /s/ Andrew Couvell
        Andrew Couvell
        President, Chief Executive Officer,
        Chief Financial Officer, and Principal
        Accounting Officer
----

|   | (1) | the                  quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gulf Western Petroleum Corporation                  for                  the period ended May 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with                  the                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                  Act of                  1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  Gulf                  Western Petroleum Corporation. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /                  s                  / Wm Milton Cox |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                  |
|   | Wm                Milton Cox                          |
|   | Chairman                  and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (principal                executive officer)          |

----
EXHIBIT 31


       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


I, Douglas R. Krueger, President of Citicorp Mortgage Securities, Inc., certify
that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
     8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
     periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Citicorp
     Mortgage Securities, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
     does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
     material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
     circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
     the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based upon my knowledge, the servicing information required to be provided
     to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement is
     included in these reports;

4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
     under the pooling and servicing agreement and based upon the review
     required under the pooling and servicing agreement, and except as disclosed
     in the report, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
     servicing agreement; and

5.   I have disclosed to the registrant's certified public accountants all
     significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's compliance with the
     minimum servicing standards in accordance with a review conducted in
     compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
     or similar standard as set forth in the pooling and servicing agreement.

Date: March 28, 2005


   /s/ Douglas R. Krueger
------------------------------
Name:  Douglas R. Krueger
Title: President
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.21.2    
  


 
 

AMENDED
  EXHIBIT "A"
  
    To The
  
    GAS PURCHASE CONTRACT
  
    As Of: October 1, 1994
  
    Between
  
    CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION ("BUYER")
  
    and
  

   IGI RESOURCES, INC. ("SELLER")    
  



Effective
Date of this Exhibit "A":  October 1, 2002 


Ending
Date of this Exhibit "A":  March 31, 2003 



	DELIVERY POINT	 	As defined in Section 1.01(g) of the Contract noted above
	 	 	 
	MAXIMUM DAILY CONTRACT QUANTITY(MMBtu)	 	7,446
	 	 	 
	DELIVERY POINT SELLING PRICE	 	1/







	1.
	The
Delivery Point Selling Price shall be equal to four dollars and sixty eight cents ($[*]U.S. dry) per MMBtu at AECO-C Hub plus the actual cost
of firm NOVA re-delivery service and firm ANG receipt and re-delivery service plus any applicable allowance for fuel-in-kind associated with such
services. 




[*] = Confidential Information




	 	 	"BUYER"

CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	 	/s/ King Oberg

	 	 	Name:	 	King Oberg

	 	 	Title:	 	Vice President, Gas Supply

	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	"SELLER"

IGI RESOURCES, INC.
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	 	/s/ Randy Schultz

	 	 	Name:	 	Randy Schultz

	 	 	Title:	 	President












QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.21.2


AMENDED EXHIBIT "A" To The GAS PURCHASE CONTRACT As Of: October 1, 1994 Between CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION ("BUYER") and IGI RESOURCES, INC. ("SELLER")
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          24,331
<SECURITIES>                                     3,297
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                       530
<INVENTORY>                                      1,460
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,736
<PP&E>                                           3,586
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,538
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,099
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,803
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,416
<SALES>                                         26,169
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,155
<CGS>                                            7,663
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,233
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,982
<INCOME-TAX>                                       699
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,283
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,283
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   $ 0.59<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $ 0.51<F1>
<FN>
<F1>INFORMATION HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO.128. BASIC AND DILUTED
EPS HAVE BEEN REPORTED IN PLACE OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  Exhibit 18



                                                               December 31, 1996


Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania, Inc.
1717 Arch Street, 32N
Philadelphia, PA 19103

We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form 
10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have read management's justification for the change in accounting from the
"amortization" revenue recognition method to the "point of publication" method
contained in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.
Based on our reading of the data and discussions with Company officials of the
business judgment and business planning factors relating to the change, we
believe management's justification is reasonable.  Accordingly,  we concur that
the newly adopted accounting principle described above is preferable in the
Company's circumstances to the method previously applied.



/s/  COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael F. Shalom, President and Chief Executive Officer of Intcomex, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 14, 2010



/s/ Michael F. ShalomMichael F. ShalomPresident and Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed the Quarterly Report of CastlePoint Holdings, Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by the Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented
in the Report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -
15(e) and 15d  15(e)) for the Company and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which the Report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in the Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the
Report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in the Report any change in the Companys internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys first quarter of 2008
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and to
the audit committee of the board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
 /s/ Michael H. LeeMichael H. LeeChief Executive OfficerMay 9, 2008 37
EXHIBIT 23.2

 

 

Consent of Independent Auditors

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this annual report (Form 10-K) and in registration statement No. 33-43236 on Form S-8, registration statement No. 33-67944 on Form S-8, registration statement No. 33-82106 on Form S-8, registration statement No. 33-82048 on Form S-8, registration statement No. 333-11311 on Form S-8, registration statement No. 333-120005 on Form S-8 and registration statement No. 333-138628 on Form S-8, of RehabCare Group, Inc. of our report dated January 30, 2006, except for Note 6 and Note 12, as to which the date is March 3, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of InteliStaf Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2005, which report appears in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of RehabCare Group,Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois

March 12, 2007
@misc{1207986,
  author = {Ira Monarch and Jacob Collard and Sangjin Shin and Eswaran Subrahmanian and Talapady N. Bhat and Ram D. Sriram},
  title = {Making Semantic Structures Explicit: Developing and Evaluating Tools and Techniques to Support Understanding of Large Cybersecurity Corpora},
  year = {2022},
  month = {2022-02-04 05:02:00},
  publisher = {NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=933620},
  language = {en},
}
#### KEARNEY v. GLENN, Collector.

No. 90.

District Court, W. D. Kentucky, at Louisville.

March 8, 1940.

Crawford, Middleton, Milner & Seelbach, of Louisville, Ky., for plaintiff.

Eli H. Brown, III, U. S. Dist. Atty, of Louisville, Ky., for defendant.

MILLER, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover an income tax claimed to have been erroneously paid by her for the year 1930, and to enjoin the collection of an additional assessment.

Defendant by answer has denied the allegations of numerous paragraphs.

Plaintiff has moved that the denials to paragraphs four and twenty-three be supplemented and clarified so as to enable the plaintiff to know on which one of several possible theories the defendant is defending the action, so as to eliminate the necessity of proof on defenses which will not be used at the time of trial. Defendant claims that a denial does not have to be made more specific and it is the plaintiff’s duty to prove all of the alleged facts which are denied.

As a strict matter of pleading, defendant’s contention is correct. Yet the new Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, look to the simplification of the issues and to the elimination of unnecessary proof. Rule 16, in providing for pretrial procedure, permits the court to direct the attorneys to confer for the purpose of a possible agreement simplifying the issues and restricting the necessity of proof on certain issues. Plaintiff’s motion is directed to this result and serves the purpose of a pretrial conference.

Plaintiff’s motion is sustained.
# covid_table48_c54_size_class
An unpublisHed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

PETER JASON HELFRICH, No. 67003
Petitioner,
vs. |
THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT | F i L E D
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, |
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF NYE, | JUL 23 205
Respondent. IE K-LINDEMAN

ev

‘DEP' RK

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that
petitioner has met his burden to demonstrate that our extraordinary
intervention is warranted. NRS 34.160; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist.
Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.

Sit

Saitta,

Bae
3 : J.
Gibbons

Preben isp J.
Pickering

ce: Peter Jason Helfrich
Attorney General/Carson City
Nye County Clerk

‘Supreme Court
oF
NevAoa

= 6 oo