alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5

<S>                                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                      DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         500,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                         3,101,061
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    3,601,061
<PP&E>                                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      5,101,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 331,687
<BONDS>                                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                                8,875
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                         5,100,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                          4,769,374
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        5,101,061
<SALES>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                            0
<CGS>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                             0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                                0
<EPS-BASIC>                                                                 0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                               0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>  AMOUNT IS LESS THAN $.01 PER SHARES
</FN>



</TABLE>
|  | • | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|  | • | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      combined predecessors of thePartnership. |
|--|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 9, 2009 | /s/MICHAEL E. MERCER                               |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                             | Michael      E. Mercer                             |
|                             | Chief      Financial Officer of EV Management LLC, |
|                             | general      partner of EV Energy GP, L.P.,        |
|                             | general      partner of EV Energy Partners,L.P.    |

----
Rail Employer Reporting Instructions

Part V – Reports of Creditable Service and Compensation

Chapter 5: Filing Instructions for Form BA-6a, Form BA-6 Address Report

1

Purpose of Form BA-6a 

Employee address records are maintained for the purpose of mailing to the employee Form BA6, "Certificate of Service Months and Compensation". This report is due by April 1 each year. 

Employers are required to file Form BA-6a, "Form BA-6 Address Report" with the RRB if they 

have hired new employees. If you have no new hires, no address report is necessary. 

New and Expanded Fields

The field sizes for the address report have been expanded and a new date field (Effective Date) 

has been added to help ensure that we have the most current information on the employee's 

record. You can now submit the employee's full name and middle initial. We will be able to 

accept up to 20 characters of the surname; and 15 characters of the first name. 

Detailed instructions for completing Form BA-6 are located on the form 

Report Current Employee Address Changes

Employers may also include the address changes of current employees on the form as well; this 

is optional. The new date field for the address will enhance the RRB's acceptance of changes of 

address. The effective date will allow the RRB to evaluate the address change submitted by the 

employer against changes-of-address received from other sources such as the US Postal Service 

and the employee; and use the most current one received.

Employee Reports Change of Address 

Even though the employer may submit address changes to the RRB via BA-6a, it is still the 

employee's responsibility to report any address changes. Instructions for employees to report 

address changes are on the employee's Form BA-6, Certificate of Service Months and 

Compensation. An employee can also report an address change to their local RRB office. 

Reporting Media 

Addresses for new hires and address changes for current employees may be reported on:

 Paper Form BA-6a, Form BA-6 Address Report (See Exhibits); 

 Magnetic media (See Form BA-6a cartridge/disk/CD-ROM format in Appendix I); 

 Computer listing. (The computer listing should include the fields from the paper form in 

the same order and should identify the tape positions at the top of each field column.); 

 Employer Reporting System (ERS) on the Internet; (See Part VIII)

 Secure E-mail; 

 File Transfer Protocol (FTP) 

Please See Part V, Chapter 1 for more information on filing options. 
Rail Employer Reporting Instructions

Part V – Reports of Creditable Service and Compensation

Chapter 5: Filing Instructions for Form BA-6a, Form BA-6 Address Report

2

Incorrect Addresses

Should the U.S. Postal Service return Form BA-6, Certificate of Service Months and 

Compensation to the RRB, we will attempt to secure an accurate address. The RRB uses address 

information from the postal service and telephone directories. If the RRB is unsuccessful in 

securing a valid address, we will contact the employer for assistance.
#### Jill D. Klimasewski, Appellant-Respondent, v County of Monroe, Respondent-Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 922]

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J. Scott Odorisi, J.), entered April 19, 2013. The order denied the motion of defendant to bifurcate the trial, granted those parts of the cross motion of plaintiff for partial summary judgment with respect to the issue of serious injury and defendant’s third and fifth affirmative defenses, and otherwise denied the cross motion.

Now, upon the stipulation discontinuing action signed by the attorneys for the parties on October 8 and 10, 2013, and filed in the Monroe County Clerk’s Office on October 11, 2013,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation. Present — Centra, J.E, Feradotto, Garni, Bindley and Valentino, JJ.
H. Res. 4 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 3, 2019. 

Resolved, That the Clerk be instructed to inform the 

President of the United States that the House of Representatives has elected Nancy Pelosi, a Representative from the 

State of California as Speaker, and Karen L. Haas, a citizen 

of the State of Maryland as Clerk, of the House of Representatives of the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 882 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 882

  Recognizing the importance of the blueberry industry to the United 
   States of America and supporting the designation of July 2020 as 
                     ``National Blueberry Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2020

    Mr. Upton (for himself and Mr. Bishop of Georgia) submitted the 
     following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                              Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the importance of the blueberry industry to the United 
   States of America and supporting the designation of July 2020 as 
                     ``National Blueberry Month''.

Whereas blueberries are a native North American fruit, first used fresh and 
        dried in food and medicines by Native Americans who introduced them to 
        early colonists, which led to new uses and forms, including frozen, 
        establishing traditions still observed today;
Whereas the pioneering work conducted in New Jersey by Elizabeth White and Dr. 
        Frederick Coville, a Department of Agriculture botanist, in the early 
        1900s, to domesticate wild lowbush blueberries resulted in the 
        development of the hybrid for cultivated highbush blueberries;
Whereas because of these early efforts, highbush blueberries are large, sweet, 
        juicy berries that can be commercially produced and shipped, allowing 
        them to become an important United States agricultural industry;
Whereas highbush blueberries have a harvested area estimated at more than 97,000 
        acres and are produced in 48 States by more than 14,000 growers and 
        their families;
Whereas highbush blueberry production in the United States has continually 
        increased, with particular growth in the past two decades, to reach a 
        harvest of 551,100,000 pounds in 2018;
Whereas blueberries are low in fat, and a source of fiber, vitamins, and 
        minerals;
Whereas blueberries are being studied to examine the role they may play in 
        promoting good health in areas such as cardiovascular health, brain 
        health, exercise, insulin response, and gut health; and
Whereas highbush blueberries are harvested in the United States from April 
        through early September, with the harvest reaching its peak in July: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``National Blueberry 
        Month'';
            (2) recognizes the contributions of American growers and 
        their families; and
            (3) recognizes that purchasing American grown blueberries 
        supports farmers, jobs, and the economy.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Greeman, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 557]

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal *(see People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]), after a colloquy in which the court clearly explained to him that the waiver was separate from the rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea, and that it encompassed the very issue he now seeks to raise concerning his forged instrument conviction. In any event, regardless of whether defendant validly waived his right to ap*464peal, his claim that he pleaded guilty to a “nonexistent crime” has been waived for an independent reason. Criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.25) is not “nonexistent.” Defendant is essentially claiming that the instrument he possessed, a bent MetroCard, did not satisfy the forgery statute. To the extent defendant is thus challenging the sufficiency of the evidence that was before the grand jury and would have been presented had he gone to trial, that claim is foreclosed by a guilty plea *(People v Taylor,*65 NY2d 1 [1985]; *People v Thomas,*53 NY2d 338 [1981]). To the extent defendant is challenging the sufficiency of his plea allocution, that claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice; the narrow exception to the preservation rule explained in *People v Lopez*(71 NY2d 662, 665-666 [1988]) does not apply since defendant’s factual recitation did not negate any element of the crime or cast significant doubt on his guilt. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Gonzalez, McGuire and Moskowitz, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-70,641]

Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on May 27, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed by the State of Georgia Employment and Training Consultant on behalf of workers of Best Textiles International LTD, New York, New York.

The petition regarding the investigation has been deemed invalid. State agency representatives cannot file petitions for workers located in another state. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of June 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-15756 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 31.1



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, Charles Driscoll, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Viscorp, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



---

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date: June 28, 2007















/s/ Charles Driscoll





Charles Driscoll









President and Chief Executive Officer
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

/ 

Ifonorabl. Oharley Loakhsrt 

Stats Treasurer 

Austin, Tents 

at e.$%lnst the VlOl%CiQll Qf th% 

auah parsolld, assoaiation of perany other oustodlanehip suoh as was 

ate Depoe%torg Aat. It was Pll;hia 

sletwe to hart so providsdt, but far 

ltimlf suoh pl~evisiaa was ngt xaader 
Honorable Charley Lo&hart, page #r! 

to be deposited dth bim, pursuant to the laws aitad above 

and applioeble thereto. 

very truly yotms 

ATRXUUEYGERi%AL OFTEXAS
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 127 (Monday, July 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15746]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,268]


LDS Test and Measurement LLC, Middleton, WI; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on May 20, 2009, in response to a petition 
filed by a company official on behalf of workers of LDS Test and 
Measurement, LLC, Middleton, Wisconsin.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of June 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-15746 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00193-CR

NO. 02-15-00194-CR

STANLEY DALE SELF APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 367TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NOS. F-90-478-E, F-90-572-E

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

In both cause numbers, appellant Stanley Dale Self attempts to appeal 

from the trial court’s orders denying his motion for appointment of counsel to 

prepare and prosecute a postconviction application for writ of habeas corpus. 

On July 15, 2015, we sent appellant a letter expressing our concern that 

we lacked jurisdiction over the appeals because, under code of criminal 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

procedure article 11.07, we have no jurisdiction over matters relating to 

postconviction applications, including requests for appointment of counsel. See

Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West 2015); Cooper v. State, No. 02-15-

00145-CR, 2015 WL 3799069, at *1 & nn.2, 4 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth June 18, 

2015, no pet. h.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (disposing of 

attempted appeal of trial court’s order denying motion for appointment of 

postconviction habeas counsel). 

We informed appellant that unless he or any party desiring to continue the 

appeals filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeals, we would 

dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction. Appellant filed a response, but it 

does not show grounds for continuing the appeals. Therefore, we dismiss the 

appeals for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth

BONNIE SUDDERTH

JUSTICE

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT AND SUDDERTH, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: July 23, 2015
----

----

|   | 1. | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|              | /s/ Martin Schacker                                                |
|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              | Martin Schacker                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|              | Co-Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| November 19, 2010 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |

----