alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
      -
      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




The
      undersigned, Wm Milton Cox, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Georgia
      Exploration, Inc. hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      the
      quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Georgia Exploration, Inc. for the period
      ended November 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
      of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Georgia Exploration, Inc.






Dated:
      January 22, 2007


/
                s
                / Wm Milton CoxWm
                Milton CoxChairman
                and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Susser Holdings Corporation (the Company) for the three months ended
July 4, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sam L. Susser, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 13, 2010



/s/ Sam L. SusserSam L. SusserPresident and Chief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - November 2005 

Benefit payments November 2005 November 2004 

Regular Retirement 

and Survivor Benefits 

Total 

Retired employ

Spouses and d

Widow(er)s - a

Other survivors 

ees 

ivorced spouses 

ged and disabled 

21,925,000 

90,998,000 

154,913,000 

$764,182,000 

496,346,000 

21,621,000 

89,794,000 

155,028,000 

$749,877,000 

483,434,000 

Average under 

Being paid Awarded in Social Security 

Monthly benefits end of month month November 2005 

Number Average1 Number Average1 Being Paid Awarded 

Total 596,300 ......... 2,400 ......... ......... .........

Regular employee annuities, total 283,100 $1,739 1,000 $2,326 ......... .........

 Age 199,100 1,700 2 400 2 2,789 $962 3 $1,304

 Disability, Full Retirement Age and Over 34,600 1,548 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Disability, Under Full Retirement Age 49,400 2,028 300 2,311 901 957 

Spouses and divorced spouses 141,000 640 800 740 465 347 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 144,500 1,069 500 1,434 912 746 

Widowed mothers and fathers 1,000 1,393 4/ 1,343 697 688 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 14,700 705 100 748 5/ 5/ 

Children 11,800 792 4/ 1,086 630 634 

Other survivors 100 761 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Benefit payments 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

November 

2005 

$4,870,000 

November 

2004 

$5,274,000 

Number 

123,300 

Average 

$42 500 

Number 

$41 

Average 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement. 

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 35); some 200

 other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis. 

4

Fewer than 50. 

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers. 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding 

Regular retirement and survivor benefit payments total includes hospital insurance benefits for services in Canada. 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

November 2005 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Average payment 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period

 Per

 full week 

Unemployment 2,500 $502 $277 

Sickness 6,500 507 

November 2005 

278 

Benefit payments 

November 2004 

Unemployment

Total 

2,321,000 

$6,482,000 $6,274,000

2,233,000 

Sickness 4,161,000 4,042,000 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited). Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.

 Recycled

 Paper 

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           6,624
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,944
<ALLOWANCES>                                       520
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         114,683
<DEPRECIATION>                                (75,431)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,161
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,161
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,983
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   667
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    937
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                937
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       937
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
# Result 6.1
Exhibit 31

      Statement Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
         By Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
       Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings


I, Steven N. Bronson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended
September 30, 2009;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

       a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
       material information relating to the registrant is made known to me by
       others, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
       being prepared;

       b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
       and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
       this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

       c) presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness
       of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of
       the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the registrant's board of directors:

       a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
       controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
       process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
       registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

       b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
       employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
       controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date:  December 29, 2009

                                            /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Steven N. Bronson, President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

v.

NELSON OTERO and MAXCIME

CAGAN, 

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Criminal No. 11-23 (SRC)

ORDER

CHESLER, District Judge

This matter having come before the Court on the motion filed by pro se Defendant Nelson

Otero ("Otero") for a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29(c)

[docket entry 92]; and Plaintiff the United States of America having opposed the motion; and the

Court having considered the papers filed by the parties; and for the reasons expressed in the

Opinion filed herewith;

IT IS on this 8th day of June, 2012, 

ORDERED that Defendant Otero's motion for judgment of acquittal [docket entry 92] be

and hereby is DENIED.

 s/Stanley R. Chesler 

STANLEY R. CHESLER

United States District Judge

Case 2:11-cr-00023-SRC Document 99 Filed 06/08/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1928
November 20, 2015 www.bls.gov

BLS Technical Advisory Committee Agenda

Bureau of Labor Statistics 

Conference Center, Rooms 1-3 

2 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20212 

8:45 Commissioner’s welcome and review of agency developments

9:15 Census – BLS Micro-productivity project 

Presenter: Cindy Zoghi, OPT 

 

10:00 Break 

10:15 Census – BLS Micro-productivity project, cont 

 Discussants: John Earle, Bart Hobijn 

11:15 Discussion of future priorities

11:45 Lunch 

12:45 Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE) Redesign 

 Presenter: Adam Safir, OPLC 

 Discussants: Bruce Meyer, Frauke Kreuter 

2:15 Break 

2:30 American Time Use Survey (ATUS) Web Collection 

Presenter: Rachel Krantz-Kent, OEUS 

Discussant: Frank Stafford 

4:00 Approximate conclusion
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED**

 

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of VirtualRadiologic Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed inthe Report.

 
| Date:                  November 3, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Sean O. Casey, M.D. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                                                                                                                              |   | Sean O. Casey, M.D.     |
|                                                                                                                              |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 127 (Monday, July 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 32012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15819]



[[Page 32012]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11794 and <greek-i>11795]


Oklahoma Disaster <greek-i>OK-00032

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Oklahoma dated 06/29/2009.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 05/13/2009.

EFFECTIVE DATES: 06/29/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 08/28/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/29/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Caddo.
Contiguous Counties: Oklahoma: Blaine, Canadian, Comanche, Custer, 
Grady, Kiowa, Washita.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere...................      4.875
Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere................      2.437
Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere...................      6.000
Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit        4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit             4.500
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11794 B 
and for economic injury is 11795 0.
    The State which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> is Oklahoma.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: June 29, 2009.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-15819 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Criminal No. 07-143 (SRC)

V.

MARCKESE STEWART

ORDER REQUIRING

ACCOMODATION FOR

ATTORNEY TELEPHONE

CONFERENCES

This matter having been opened to the Court by Bruce S. Rosen, appointed

counsel for Markese Stewart, with consent of the United States (Melissa L. Jampol, Asst,

U.S. Attorney appearing), and the Court finding good cause for the issuance of this

Order, and it is,

ORDERED that South Woods State Prison in Bridgeton, N.J. be required

to provide inmate Markese Stewart, inmate number 590649/ SBI 000150812C, with

telephonic access to his attorney, Bruce S. Rosen, no later than 11 am. Tuesday, March

22, 2011 and at such other times through March 24, 2011 as required by Mr. Rosen, with

two-hour notice to prison officials.

SO ORDERED

ThON. STANLEY R. CHESLER, U.S.DJ.

Dated
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7409

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Petitioner - Appellee, 

v. 

DUANE LETROY BERRY, 

Respondent - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:20-hc-02085-BR) 

Submitted: December 22, 2020 Decided: December 29, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Duane Letroy Berry, Appellant Pro Se. Genna Danelle Petre, Special Assistant United 

States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Duane Letroy Berry—a former federal criminal defendant against whom a civil 

commitment proceeding is pending—seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting his 

request to hold evaluations and deadlines in abeyance and directing the clerk to terminate 

a hearing. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, 

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); 

Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). The order Berry

seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Berry’s motions to 

amend or correct the record or certified list, to recall and stay the order, and to substitute 

party. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
period ended March 31, 2011 (the Report), filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
  /s/ Robert G. CostantiniRobert G. CostantiniExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
# Self-Analysis Worksheet

**For Use with the****Criteria for Performance Excellence****,****Education Criteria for Performance Excellence****,****Health Care Criteria for Performance Excellence****, or****Baldrige Excellence Builder**

Insights gained from external examiners or reviewers are always helpful, but you know your organization. You are in an excellent position to identify your organization’s key strengths and key opportunities for improvement (OFIs). 

· Complete your responses, or have a team create responses, to the questions in the seven Baldrige Criteria categories found in the Baldrige Excellence Framework booklet or the Baldrige Excellence Builder. 

· Identify one or two strengths and one or two OFIs for each Criteria category, and record them on this worksheet. 

· For strengths and OFIs of high importance, use the worksheet to create and communicate an action plan for improvement.
# Result 21.1
Case 2:10-cv-06110-WHW-MCA Document 29-7 Filed 02/18/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 310
Case 2:10-cv-06110-WHW-MCA Document 29-7 Filed 02/18/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 311
# covid_table16_q6_naics
: 

VIRTUAL STUDIOS, INC. : UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

: DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Plaintiff, :

: 

v. : Civil Action No. 11-427 (JLL)

:

COURISTAN, INC., :

: ORDER ON INFORMAL APPLICATION

Defendant. : AND AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

____________________________________: 

THIS MATTER having come before the Court for a telephone status conference on

March 9, 2012; and for good cause shown:

IT IS on this 9 day of March 2012, th

ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff will produce the outstanding Thomas Sucher documents to defendant on

or before March 16, 2012. The parties have agreed that defendant may re-depose

Thomas Sucher upon defendant’s receipt of the documents, and will meet and

confer on whether and when such deposition will take place. 

2. On or before March 16, 2012, the parties will advise the Court of their proposed

date and time for a settlement conference.

3. The parties will meet and confer regarding the outstanding discovery disputes

discussed during the March 9, 2012, conference, including but not limited to: (1)

Plaintiff’s proposal for an extension of the discovery deadline to allow it to

subpoena from third parties certain communications between defendant and four

of its vendors; (2) plaintiff’s demand for a chart prepared by defendant and the

issue of whether the chart and/or related communications are protected by the

work-product doctrine; and (3) defendant’s demand for approximately twentyeight documents that plaintiff inadvertently produced to defendant, which

defendant destroyed pursuant to the terms of the Discovery Confidentiality Order

filed on November 1, 2011 [ECF No. 31], and for which defendant now claims

plaintiff has failed to preserve the privilege.

4. On or before March 28, 2012, the parties shall file a joint letter advising the

Court of the results of their meet-and-confer on the above issues. For each

unresolved issue, each party shall present its position on that issue, the basis for its

position, and the legal authorities supporting its position. The parties shall also

Case 2:11-cv-00427-JLL -MAH Document 44 Filed 03/09/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 206
advise the Court of whether and when defendant will resume the deposition of

Thomas Sucher.

5. Fact discovery is hereby extended to April 16, 2012. The Court will revisit this

issue and the anticipated extension of deadlines for expert reports and expert

discovery upon its review of the March 28, 2012, joint letter.

s/ Michael A. Hammer 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 2:11-cv-00427-JLL -MAH Document 44 Filed 03/09/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 207