Opinion filed July 23, 2015

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

___________

No. 11-15-00120-CR

___________

CORY SHANE FIELDS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 350th District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11208-D

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Cory Shane Fields, Appellant, has filed an untimely pro se notice of appeal 

from a conviction for aggravated sexual assault. We dismiss the appeal. 

The documents on file in this case indicate that Appellant’s sentence was

imposed on January 23, 2015, and that his notice of appeal was filed in the district 

clerk’s office on May 26, 2015. When the appeal was filed in this court, we notified 

Appellant by letter that the notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and that the 
2

appeal may be dismissed. We requested that Appellant respond to our letter and 

show grounds to continue. The trial court subsequently appointed counsel to 

represent Appellant on appeal. Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a 

response to this court’s letter. 

In the response, appellate counsel states that he has been informed by 

Appellant that Appellant verbally requested his trial counsel to file an appeal. 

Likewise, in his pro se notice of appeal, Appellant requests an out-of-time appeal 

and asserts that his retained trial counsel failed to file a notice of appeal as Appellant 

requested. Appellate counsel correctly acknowledges that “the proper avenue” to 

determine if Appellant is entitled to a direct appeal may “be by way of writ of habeas 

corpus.” 

Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2, a notice of appeal is due to be filed either 

(1) within thirty days after the date that sentence is imposed in open court or (2) if 

the defendant timely files a motion for new trial, within ninety days after the date 

that sentence is imposed in open court. A notice of appeal must be in writing and 

filed with the clerk of the trial court. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(c)(1); see also Shute v. 

State, 744 S.W.2d 96, 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988) (oral notice of appeal not 

sufficient). The documents on file in this court reflect that Appellant’s notice of 

appeal was filed with the clerk of the trial court 123 days aftersentence wasimposed.

The notice of appeal was, therefore, untimely. 

Absent a timely filed notice of appeal or the granting of a timely motion for 

extension of time, we do not have jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. Slaton v. 

State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). 

Neither a notice of appeal nor a motion for extension were filed within the fifteenday period permitted by TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. This court, as an intermediate 
3

appellate court, has no jurisdiction to grant an out-of-time appeal or to grant an 

untimely motion for extension; the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals is the only court 

with jurisdiction in final postconviction felony proceedings. Olivo, 918 S.W.3d at 

522–24, 525 n.8; Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1991). 

This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

July 23, 2015

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.