alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Pedro Heureaux, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 720]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Honorof, J.), rendered July 24, 2003, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to *1021withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

The defendant has not raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Adams, J.E, Krausman, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
| 1.   | the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 9, 2010 | /s/ Edsel R. Burns                                            |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Edsel R. Burns                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |

| Date: August 9, 2010 | /s/ Larry A. Blount                                            |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Larry A. Blount                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 22, 2015

No. 04-15-00124-CR

Hector RAMIREZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR2894

The Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. We 

ORDER appellant to file his brief on or before August 10, 2015. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS 

WILL BE GRANTED.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with this Quarterly Report of Red Trail Energy, LLC (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark E. Klimpel,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August
14, 2009


/s/
      Mark E. KlimpelMark
      E. KlimpelChief
      Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certificationof Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Cary J.Claiborne, certify that:

1.               Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Osiris Therapeutics, Inc.

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s), and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating  to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         [Paragraphomitted in accordance with SEC Release 34-47986]

(c)          Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(d)         Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: November 13,2006

 
|        |   | /s/ Cary J. Claiborne   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Cary J. Claiborne       |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 123 (Monday, June 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15215]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,907]


Tecumseh Products, Verona, MS; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on May 11, 2009 in response to a petition 
filed on behalf of workers at Tecumseh Products, Verona, Mississippi. 
The workers at the subject facility produce compressors and small 
motors.
    The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 20th day of May 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-15215 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
WHEN CAN I RETIRE?

A SPOUSE

BORN IN*

AT AGE 62,

ANNUITY

REDUCED BY**

OR

NO ANNUITY REDUCTION

IF RETIREMENT AGE

IS AT LEAST

1957 32.50% 66 and 6 months

1958 33.333% 66 and 8 months

1959 34.167% 66 and 10 months

1960 or later 35.00% 67

These reductions also apply to divorced spouses.

*A person attains a given age the day before their birthday, and those born on the first or

 second day of a month are eligible for an annuity beginning date on the first of that month.

**For the spouse of an employee who has less than 10 years of railroad service – If the spouse is

 already entitled to an age-reduced social security benefit, the age reduction in their tier I will be

 based on the age reduction applicable on the beginning date of their social security benefit,

 even if they are already full retirement age on their railroad retirement annuity beginning date.

NOTE – If the employee had any rail service before August 12, 1983, the spouse’s tier II reduction

 remains 25% and their full retirement age remains 65 for tier II purposes.

I’m the spouse of an employee retiring

with less than 30 years of service.

January 2024
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-05-00608- CR Ja m e s Edwa r d Tho m pso n, A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF BELL CO UNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 57464 , HO NORAB LE MARTH A J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESI DING

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Ap p el l ant’s motion to dism iss this appea l is gra nted. SeeT e x. R. Ap p . P. 42.2(a) . The a ppeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________ Be a Ann Smith, J ustice Be fore J ustices B . A. Smith, P atterson a nd Puryear Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: Oc tober 19, 2005 Do No t Pu

bli sh
Exhibit 10.01 8-2-13






Exhibit 10.01


Letter of extension for the Company's credit agreement

Dated July 29, 2013



In accordance with Section 2.21 of the Company's Credit Agreement dated December 13, 2011, Lenders holding Commitments aggregating $750 million have approved the extension of the Maturity Date (with respect to their Commitments only) for an additional year until December 13, 2017.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED March 1, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40267 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PABLO MORENO-MORA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-1244-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Pablo Moreno-Mora (Moreno) appeals his conviction and sentence for unlawful reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Moreno first argues that the district court erred by imposing a 16-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 for a prior Maryland conviction for a crime of violence. The record contains no indication of which section of the Maryland statute was applied to Moreno. Accordingly, we cannot determine whether the enhancement was proper. The Government’sNo. 05-40267 -2- contention that the offense is established by the Presentence Report’s characterization of the offense as second-degree felony assault is without merit. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 274 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with the procedure set forth in United States v. Bonilla-Mungia , 422 F.3d 316, 321-22 (5th Cir. 2005). We do not reach Moreno’s alternative argument that the sentence was unreasonable under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). With respect to Moreno’s contention that the district court erred in ordering, as a condition of supervised release, that he cooperate with the probation officer in the collection of DNA, his claim is not ripe for judicial review in light of our holding in United States v. Carmichael , 343 F.3d 756, 758 (5th Cir. 2003), cert. denied , 540 U.S. 1136 (2004). We reject Moreno’s contention that Carmichael is distinguishable. See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu , 428 F.3d 1100, 1102 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed , (Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). Accordingly, we dismiss this portion of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Moreno’s constitutional challenge to § 1326(b) is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Moreno contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on theNo. 05-40267 -3- basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d at 276. Moreno properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.
CONVICTION AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION; SENTENCE VACATED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
H. Res. 777 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 7, 2020. 

Resolved, That the Clerk of the House inform the Senate 

that a quorum of the House is present and that the House 

is ready to proceed with business. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Sterling Financial Corporation ofour reports dated March 25, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of SterlingFinancial Corporation, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:
(1)  Registration Statement (Form S-3/A No. 33-55131) pertaining to the Sterling FinancialCorporation Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (2)  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-28101) pertaining to the 1997 Directors StockCompensation Plan and Policy (3)  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-103069), pertaining to the Sterling FinancialCorporation 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (4)  Registration Statement (Form S-4/A No. 333-117921), pertaining to the acquisition of thePennsylvania State Banking Company
of our report dated March 25, 2005, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements ofSterling Financial Corporation and our report dated March 25, 2005, with respect to management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in this Annual Report (Form10-K) of Sterling Financial Corporation.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ernest Davis, Appellant.

Submitted February 4, 2013;

decided March 28, 2013

*1094Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain the motion from the order of the Appellate Term *(see*CPLR 5602 [a]). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
July 23, 2015

Twelfth Court of Appeals

1517 W Front St Ste 354

Tyler TX 75702-7854

Re: Gregory Lee West

 12-14-00170-CR

To The Honorable Clerk of the Court:

Please find enclosed a copy of the letter sent to my client regarding his right to file a PDR along 

with a copy of the certified return receipt showing the mailing of the same. 

Sincerely,

/s/Austin Reeve Jackson

ACCEPTED

12-14-00170-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

7/23/2015 2:17:33 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 7/23/2015 2:17:33 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk

July 23, 2015

Gregory Lee West

15581 Brittain

Lindale, TX 75771

Re: Opinion

 

Mr. West: 

Please find enclosed a copy of opinion issued by the Court of Appeals in your case. The Court 

has affirmed your conviction.

Should you desire to do so, you do have the right to file a pro se Petition for Discretionary 

Review in the Court of Criminal Appeals. If you decide to pursue that option you must file your 

petition prior to the expiration of thirty days from the date of the court’s opinion.

I would be happy to address any questions or concerns you have if you will simply let me know. 

Sincerely,

Austin Reeve Jackson
Data Users Advisory Committee 

Meeting Agenda 

Tuesday, November 17, 2009 

Bureau of Labor Statistics Conference Center, Room 3 

2 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E. 

Washington, DC 20212 

8:30 am Registration 

9:00 am The State of BLS: Commissioner’s report 

9:45 am Strategic planning: Information gathering and analysis 

11:15 am Employment projections: Status of program initiatives 

1:30 pm Green jobs: Plans for measurement 

2:30 pm Alleged undercount in the Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses: 

The debate to date and current research plans 

3:30 pm BLS Outreach: Development of metrics 

4:45 pm Conclusion
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 123 (Monday, June 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15375]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10 a.m. on 
Tuesday, June 23, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation met in open session to consider the following 
matters:

Summary Agenda

    Disposition of minutes of previous Board of Directors' Meetings.
    Summary reports, status reports, reports of the Office of Inspector 
General, and reports of actions taken pursuant to authority delegated 
by the Board of Directors.
    Memorandum and resolution re: Interagency Interim Rule on Capital 
Maintenance: Residential Mortgage Loans Modified Pursuant to the Making 
Home Affordable Program of the U.S. Department of Treasury.
    Memorandum and resolution re: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
regarding Proposed Interagency Guidance--Funding and Liquidity Risk 
Management.

Discussion Agenda

    Memorandum and resolution re: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the 
Transaction Account Guarantee Program.
    Memorandum and resolution re: Joint Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: 
Amendment to the Community Reinvestment Act Regulation.
    Memorandum and resolution re: Final Rule on Annual Audit and 
Reporting Requirements (Part 363) and Related Technical Amendment to 
(Part 308, Subpart U).
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice 
Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, seconded by Director Thomas J. Curry 
(Appointive), and concurred in by Director John C. Dugan (Director, 
Comptroller of the Currency), Director John E. Bowman (Acting Director, 
Office of Thrift Supervision), and Chairman Sheila C. Bair, that 
Corporation business required its consideration of the matters on less 
than seven days' notice to the public; and that no earlier notice of 
the meeting than that previously provided on June 19, 2009, was 
practicable.
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550--17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

    Dated: June 23, 2009.
    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-15375 Filed 6-25-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE; P
GL-129A (05-96)

RECORD OF EMPLOYER DETERMINATION ON

EMPLOYEE PROTEST OF SERVICE AND COMPENSATION

Name

 

BA Number

 

Social Security Number

 

Payroll Ident .

 

Employee proof attached.

SERVICE MONTHS

YEAR

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

EMPLOYEE

CLAIMS 

EMPLOYER

REPORTED 

COMPENSATION

YEAR RRA CREDITABLE AMOUNT

RUIA CREDITABLE AMOUNT

TIER I TIER II

EMPLOYEE

CLAIMS 

EMPLOYER

REPORTED 

1. I have reviewed the employee's claim and find it is correct.

A. Form BA-4 certifying the above adjustment is attached.

B. The above adjustment will be included on our next adjustment report.

2. I have reviewed the employee's claim but do not concur.

A. An adjustment is being certified which is different than the one claimed. Form BA-4 is

attached.

B. The employee's service and compensation is correct as reported. No adjustment is

required. The employee's documentation does not support this claim because

SIGNATURE TITLE DATE