alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Huber and another *v.*Myers Sanitary Depot and others.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

December 6, 1887.)

Patents for Inventions—Infringement—Injunction—Foreign Patent.

Plaintiffs purchased an invention upon which a British patent had been obtained, but which had expired before the purchase by reason of the failure to pay the fee t.o keep it alive. They then obtained American patents, and sought to enjoin defendants from infringing uj)on them. *Held,*that there was too much doubt of the validity of the American patents to warrant the issuing of a preliminary injunction.

In Equity. Bill for injunction.

*Albert Comstock,*for complainants.

*Wm. H, Sage,*for defendants.

Lacombe, J.

This is an application for a preliminary injunction to restrain the infringement of two letters patent, owned by complainants, and issued, the one, June 27, 1882, (260,232,) to Henry Huber, assignee by mesne assignments of Peters & Donald; the other, March 28, 1882, (255,'485',)'to James E. Boyle. Both patents are for improvements in sanitary water-closets. The application, so far as it concerns the Huber patent, is resisted, *inter alia,*on the ground of abandonment. It appears that on April 7, 1874, Peters *&*Donald took out a British patent for their invention. On April 9, 1881, this British patent expired by reason of their failure to pay the fee required by the British patent law to keep it alive. Boyle subsequently (October 27, 1881) purchased the Peters & Donald invention, and sold it (November 26, 1881) to Huber, who on November 29, 1881, applied for a patent thereon. The American patent was granted to him June 27, 1882.

It is claimed by the defendants that by reason of the failure of the inventors to keep alive the British patent, their invention was abandoned *49to the public, and could hot be afterwards reclaimed. The point raised is a new one. The decisions which have heretofore been rendered as to the effect of the lapse of an English ¡latent for non-payment of taxes do not apply; they deal simply with the effect of a lapse subsequent to the issue of the American patent. *Paillard*v. *Bruno,*29 Fed. Rep. 864; *Holmes v. Metropolitan Co.,*21 Fed. Rep. 458; *Reissner*v. *Sharp,*16 Blalchf. 383; *Henry*v. *Tool Co.,*3 Ban. & A. 501. Without passing upon the objection thus presented by the defendants, it is sufficient to say that it raises too great doubt of the validity of the patent to warrant the issuing of a preliminary injunction, in the absence of an adjudication in its support. 6

With regard to the alleged infringement of the seventh claim of the Boyle patent, No. 255,485, anticipation is suggested in a prior patent to Owen; the variation between the forms of closet in the two patents being, it is claimed, not such as will support the patentability of the later device. In the absence of adjudication upon the Boyle patent, and in view of all the facts, a preliminar}’' injunction will not issue.
Order entered July 21, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00019-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.E.R. AND E.N.R., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-51128-2012

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Bridges and Justice Stoddart

Before the Court is appellant’s July 21, 2015 Motion to Suspend (Partially) Trial Court’ s 

Order Pending Appeal. We DENY the motion.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-20483

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DOCTORY HAMPTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-96-CR-193-2

- - - - - - - - - -

April 01, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Doctory Hampton appeals his sentence following his

conviction for armed bank robbery, conspiracy to use and carry a

firearm during a crime of violence, and using and carrying a

firearm during a crime of violence. Hampton argues that the

district court erred in enhancing his base offense level under

U.S.S.G. § 3A1.2(b) because that guideline protects law

enforcement and corrections officers and does not apply to

victims who are private security guards.
No. 97-20483 

-2-

In the alternative to enhancing Hampton’s base offense level 

under § 3A1.2(b), the district court upwardly departed based on

an aggravating circumstance not considered by the guidelines. 

See U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0, p.s.; 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b). Because Hampton

has not argued on appeal that this upward departure was

erroneous, this issue has been abandoned. See United States v.

Rivas, 99 F.3d 170, 176 (5th Cir. 1996). We decline to make a

determination whether the district court erred in applying

§ 3A1.2(b) and affirm the district court’s upward departure.

Hampton also contends, for the first time on appeal, that

U.S.S.G. § 1B1.1, comment. (n.1(j)), which defines “serious

bodily injury” is unconstitutionally vague and that his sentence

should not have been increased four levels under § 2B3.1(b)(3)(B)

on the ground that the victim suffered a serious bodily injury. 

In light of the facts that the victim suffered great pain; the

wound was in a “critical area” and could very easily have killed

the victim; the victim was hospitalized for 22 hours; and the

victim was unable to work for about six weeks, Hampton has not

demonstrated plain error with respect to his contention that the

definition of serious bodily injury is unconstitutionally vague

as applied to him. 

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 127 (Monday, July 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15761]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,769]


The Berquist Company, Touch Screen Division, 301 Washington 
Street, Cannon Falls, MN; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on May 29, 2009 in response to a worker 
petition filed by a Minnesota Agency Representative on behalf of 
workers of The Berquist Company, Touch Screen Division, Cannon Falls, 
Minnesota.
    The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition 
(TA-W-70,019) filed on May 18, 2009 that is the subject of an ongoing 
investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of June 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-15761 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Income Properties 6 1996 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000812564
<NAME> ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES 6
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,852
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      279
<ALLOWANCES>                                       181
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          36,604
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,811
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         25,009
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,811
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,537
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,872
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,693
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,106
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,106
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 10,135
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,106
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   127.60<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
31.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER





I,
Michael Tribolet, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Form 10-Q of RedRoller Holdings, Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:





(a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting; and





5. The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.





Dated:
May 15, 2008


By:
              /s/ Michael
      TriboletMichael
      TriboletChief
      Executive Officer(authorized
      officer of registrant)
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 533 

Recognizing the accomplishments of professional surfer and surfwear executive 

Danny Kwock. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2019 

Mr. ROUDA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the accomplishments of professional surfer and 

surfwear executive Danny Kwock. 

Whereas Danny Kwock was born in 1961 in Honolulu, Hawaii; 

Whereas, at age 8, Danny Kwock began surfing in Waikiki, 

Hawaii; 

Whereas, at age 12, Danny Kwock moved to Newport Beach, 

California, and began surfing at the Wedge; 

Whereas Danny Kwock joined the Western Surfing Association, the longest running amateur surfing association in 

the United States, in Huntington Beach, California; 

Whereas while attending high school in Newport Beach, 

Danny Kwock signed sponsorship deals with Quiksilver, 

Rip Curl, and McCoy Surfboards; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 533 IH 

Whereas Danny Kwock was one of the leaders of the California New Wave surfers in the late 1970s and early 

1980s; 

Whereas, in 1986, Danny Kwock was named Marketing Director for Quiksilver; 

Whereas Danny Kwock helped develop the Quiksilver in 

Memory of Eddie Aikau contest at Waimea Bay, Hawaii, 

that was first held in 1984; 

Whereas Danny Kwock helped develop the Men Who Ride 

Mountains contest at Maverick’s, one of the wildest, 

heaviest, most dangerous big-wave spots on Earth, first 

held in 1999 in California; 

Whereas Danny Kwok helped bring future world surfing 

champions Kelly Slater and Lisa Andersen to the 

Quiksilver team; and 

Whereas, in 2002, Kwock was named President of Quicksilver’s new Quicksilver Entertainment division: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the accomplishments of professional surfer and 

3 surfwear executive Danny Kwock and his important role 

4 in establishing coastal Orange County as a focal point of 

5 the surf industry. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6204

WILLIAM C. BREWSTER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus KEITH E. OLSON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-97-975-5) Submitted: April 7, 1998 Decided: June 22, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William C. Brewster, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brewster v. Olson , No. CA-97-975-5 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 1, 1997). Brewster’s motions for release on bond pending appeal, to expedite appellate review, and for appellate court review are now moot and therefore denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

L.C. ELDRIDGE SALES CO., LTD., LESEMAN 

DAVIS LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

JURONG SHIPYARD PTE., LTD., ATWOOD 

DRILLING, INC., ATWOOD OCEANICS 

MANAGEMENT, LP, ATWOOD OCEANICS GLOBAL 

LIMITED, SEADRILL AMERICAS, INC., SEADRILL 

US GULF LLC,

Defendants-Appellants

AZEN MANUFACTURING PTE., LTD., SEMBCORP 

MARINE LTD., TWIN CITY FAN COMPANIES, 

LTD., ZHENGZHOU FG OFFSHORE 

ENGINEERING & EQUIPMENT CO., LTD., FG 

ENGINEERING, LTD., SEMBCORP HOLDINGS, 

LLC, SEMBCORP-SABINE INDUSTRIES, INC., 

SEMBCORP-SABINE SHIPYARD, INC.,

Defendants

______________________ 

2015-1143

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Texas in No. 6:11-cv-00599-MHS, 

Judge Michael H. Schneider.

______________________ 
 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, Yetter Coleman, LLP, Austin, 

TX, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Also represented by 

THOMAS M. MORROW, MARC S. TABOLSKY, RICHARD PAUL 

YETTER, ERIC P. CHENOWETH, Houston, TX.

DAVID A. ALLGEYER, Lindquist & Vennum PLLP, 

Minneapolis, MN, argued for defendants-appellants. Also 

represented by CARRIE RYAN GALLIA, CHRISTOPHER R.

SULLIVAN. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and CHEN, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 17, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-70,560]

Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on May 26, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers of URS Corporation, Washington Division, working on-site at Caterpillar Technical Center Building G, Mossville, Illinois.

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition (TA-W-70,424) filed on May 22, 2009 that is the subject of an ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of June 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-15754 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Subsidiary
    
    State or other jurisdiction of IncorporationSovereign Bank
    
    United States of America195 Montague Street, L.P.
    
    New YorkBeacon Abstract, L.P.
    
    PennsylvaniaCapital Street LP
    
    Cayman IslandsCapital Street S.A.
    
    LuxembourgDrive Consumer GP LLC
    
    DelawareDrive Consumer LP
    
    DelawareDrive Receivables Corp. 11
    
    DelawareDrive Receivables Corp. 12
    
    DelawareDrive Residual Holdings GP LLC
    
    DelawareDrive Residual Holdings LP
    
    DelawareDrive Trademark Holdings LP
    
    DelawareDrive Warehouse GP LLC
    
    DelawareDrive Warehouse LP
    
    DelawareIndependence Community Bank Corp.
    
    DelawareIndependence Community Commercial
Reinvestment Corp.
    
    DelawareMeridian Capital Group, LLC
    
    DelawarePBE Companies, LLC
    
    DelawareSantander Consumer Receivables LLC
    
    DelawareSantander Consumer Receivables 2 LLC
    
    DelawareSantander Consumer USA Inc.
    
    IllinoisSantander Drive Auto Receivables LLC
    
    DelawareSantander Warehouse LLC
    
    DelawareSOV APEX LLC
    
    DelawareSOV Charter Limited
    
    UK (England & Wales)Sovereign Agency Massachusetts, LLC
    
    MassachusettsSovereign Community Development Company
    
    DelawareSovereign Delaware Investment Corporation
    
    DelawareSovereign Leasing LLC
    
    DelawareSovereign Precious Metals, LLC
    
    PennsylvaniaSovereign Real Estate Investment Trust
    
    DelawareSovereign REIT Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareSovereign Securities Corporation, LLC
    
    PennsylvaniaSovereign Trade Services (HK) Limited
    
    Hong KongTriad Financial Residual Special Purpose LLC
    
    DelawareTriad Financial SM Inc.
    
    DelawareTriad Financial Special Purpose LLC
    
    DelawareTriad Financial Warehouse Special Purpose LLC
    
    DelawareWaypoint Insurance Group, Inc.
    
    PennsylvaniaWaypoint Settlement Services, LLC
    
    Pennsylvania
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 883 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 883

   Expressing support for designation of March 3, 2020, as National 
                   Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2020

 Mr. Morelle submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing support for designation of March 3, 2020, as National 
                   Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Day.

Whereas triple-negative breast cancer was recognized as a distinct type of 
        cancer in 2006;
Whereas triple-negative breast cancer disproportionately affects young women, 
        Black and Hispanic women, and those with BRCA gene mutations;
Whereas triple-negative breast cancers are estrogen receptor-negative, 
        progesterone receptor-negative, and HER2-negative, making them distinct 
        from other breast cancers;
Whereas there is no targeted therapy for triple-negative breast cancers;
Whereas 10 to 20 percent of all breast cancer diagnoses are designated as 
        triple-negative;
Whereas triple-negative breast cancer can be more aggressive and more likely to 
        spread and recur;
Whereas triple-negative breast cancer accounts for around 25 percent of all 
        deaths from breast cancer in the United States; and
Whereas March 3, 2020, would be an appropriate date to designate as National 
        Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of National Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Day to create 
awareness of the devastating effect of these cancers on American 
families and the need for strong action to eradicate triple-negative 
breast cancer.
                                 <all>
```