alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frederick Pagan, Appellant.

Submitted April 15, 2013;

decided April 25, 2013

*901Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
# table135_q14.6_size
# table32_q4.6_state
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 24.3


                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the use of our report dated February 28, 1998, with respect to the
financial statements of AnswerSoft, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Davox Corporation.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
of Davox Corporation on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-89582, 333-07003, 333-16209,
333-30727, 333-52551, 33-47618, 33-47619, 33-51578, and 333-83687) of our report
dated February 28, 1998, with respect to the financial statements of AnswerSoft,
Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Davox Corporation.

                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

                                                 ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 2, 2000
EXAMPLE

ONLY

CERTIFIED 01-15-2023

2022 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

MONTHS AND COMPENSATION

SERVICE AND COMPENSATION REPORTED 

FOR PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2022

FORM BA-6 (6-23)

SERVICE AND COMPENSATION ON RECORD FOR REVIEW PERIOD

SEPARATION ALLOWANCE/

SEVERANCE PAYMENT

SERVICE MONTHS

PROFILE*

TAXABLE AMOUNT COMPENSATION

AMOUNT J 

1 

1 

1 

F

1

1

1

M

1 

1 

1 

A

1

1

1

M

1 

1 

1

J

1

1

1

J

1

D

1

A

1

D

1

S

1

1

1

O

1 

1 

1

N 

1 

1 

1

D 

1 

1 

0

TOTAL

12

12

11

 2022 120,600.00

116,250.00 

106,475.00 

2021

2020

2019 55,375.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 05

*1 - A reported month; 0 - A month not reported; D - A “deemed” month

CAREER TOTAL RETIREMENT RECORD

SEPARATION ALLOWANCE/

SEVERANCE PAYMENT SERVICE MONTHS

EMPLOYEE

TAXABLE CONTRIBUTIONS

AMOUNT

COMPENSATION

AMOUNT

REPORTED DEEMED MILITARY TOTAL

987,900.00 205 2 12 219 42,700.00 

YOUR 2022 REPORTING EMPLOYER(S) 

The service and compensation shown on this form for 2022 were gathered from a report(s) received from the 

following employer(s): CRESCENT RAILROAD COMPANY 

BIRTH DATE SEX 

07-1970 M

RRB OFFICE SERVING YOUR AREA 2022 RUIA EARNINGS 

123 CENTRAL AVENUE

WINDY CITY, IL 60000 PHONE (877) 772-5772

QUALIFIED QUALIFYING 

EARNINGS

Y $21,060 

U.S. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

ERHARD CHORLÉ, JOHN BRAGG, THOMAS JAYNE

MEMBERS

CREDITABLE

COMPENSATION YEAR

CREDITABLE

COMPENSATION

BA 0123 ****

JOHN Q PUBLIC

123 MAIN ST

LOGANVILLE, IL 60000
#### GROVES et al. v. PADEN CITY GLASS MFG. CO.

Civil Action No. 11-P.

District Court, N. D. West Virginia.

March 26, 1942.

*301William Bruce Hoif, of Parkersburg, W. Va., for plaintiffs.

Robert B. McDougle, of Parkersburg, W. Va., for defendant.

HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.

Plaintiff sues in his own behalf, and as agent for 197 other employes of Paden City Glass Manufacturing Company, to recover from their employer unpaid minimum wages and unpaid overtime compensation under the provisions of Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b). Defendant has made a motion under Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c, to strike certain allegations from the complaint as rediundant, immaterial and impertinent. These allegations in the complaint consist of statements concerning the exact duties of the various employes and the relation of their duties to each other.

The complaint lists the employes as gatherers, pressers, blowers, lever boys, etc., and then proceeds to briefly describe the particular work of each group of employes in the manufacturing of the glass product. It is said that pleading such matter amounts to pleading evidence and should, therefore, be stricken. It is true that such allegations plead evidential facts, but such pleadings should not always be stricken. Where evidential facts, when read with the bill as a whole, give a better understanding thereof, they should not be stricken. This principle is particularly applicable in a case of this nature involving many complex issues. In such cases greater latitude in pleading should be allowed. Moore’s Federal Practice, Vol. 1, page 660. Allegations of evidential facts in such cases, although unnecessary under the rule of brevity, are not stricken out if not prejudicial. Samuel Goldwyn, Inc., v. United Artists Corp., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 35 F. Supp. 633; French v. French Paper Co. D.C.W.D. Mich., 1 F.R.D. 531; Haddock v. Springfield Yellow Cab Co., D.C.S.D. Ohio, 1 F.R.D. 504. Where no harm can come to the defendant, ordinarily the court is very cautious about disturbing the pleading unless the court can clearly see that the allegations have no possible bearing upon the subject matter of the litigation. Kraus v. General Motors Corp., D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1939, 27 F.Supp. 537.

The motion to strike is overruled.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of mPhase Technologies,
Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10Q/A for the quarter
ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), I, Martin S Smiley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

/s/ Martin S.
SmileyMartin S .Smiley Chief Financial Officer

May 11, 2010

---
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Angeles Income Properties, Ltd. 6 (the "Partnership"), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                     
| | --------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long   
| | Martha L. Long      
| | Date: March 25, 2008
| |                     
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters
| | Stephen B. Waters   
| | Date: March 25, 2008





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Annual Report of Vibrosaun International, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), we, David C. Merrell, President, and Michael C. Brown, Secretary, Treasurer and CFO of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:February 22, 2010By:/s/David C. MerrellDavid C. Merrell, President and Director  Date:February 22, 2010By:/s/Michael C. BrownMichael C. Brown, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
@conference{1206176,
  author = {Himanshu Neema and Harmon Nine and Thomas Roth},
  title = {Reusable Network Simulation for CPS Co-Simulations},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-05-09 04:05:00},
  publisher = {Proceedings of Cyber-Physical Systems and Internet of Things Week 2023, San Antonio, TX, US},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936563},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3576914.3587531},
  language = {en},
}
Exhibit 31.1.  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Chief Executive Officer Certification
Pursuant To Section 302 Of 
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

|I, James D. Delamater, certify that:
|------------------------------------
|                                    
|1.                                  
|                                    
|2.                                  
|                                    
|3.                                  
|                                    
|4.                                  
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|5.                                  
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    



|September 26, 2006 | /s/ James D. Delamater 
|------------------ | -----------------------
|                   | James D. Delamater     
|                   | Chief Executive Officer
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 7TH DISTRICT COURT OF SMITH COUNT Y, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 2nd
day of September , 2015 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

JASON CLAIRE REESE , Appellant

NO. 12

- 14

- 00363

- CR; Trial Court No. 007

- 1254

- 14

By per curiam opinion.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in thes e words:

“ THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and brief filed herein, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgmen t of the court

below be in all things affirmed , and that this decision be certified to the court below for

observance. ”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this be half, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Tyler, this the 27 th day of October , 2015.

PAM ESTES , CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - August 2005 

Benefit payments August 2005 August 2004 

Regular Retirement 

and Survivor Benefits 

Total 

Retired employ

Spouses and d

Widow(er)s - a

Other survivors 

ees 

ivorced spouses 

ged and disabled 

22,035,000 

91,181,000 

154,952,000 

$763,537,000 

495,369,000 

21,790,000 

89,482,000 

155,179,000 

$748,085,000 

481,634,000 

Average under 

Being paid Awarded in Social Security 

Monthly benefits end of month month August 2005 

Number Average1 Number Average1 Being Paid Awarded 

Total 598,400 ......... 3,100 ......... ......... .........

Regular employee annuities, total 283,800 $1,729 1,100 $2,329 ......... .........

 Age 199,900 1,690 2 500 2 2,785 $960 3 $1,283

 Disability, Full Retirement Age and Over 34,600 1,539 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Disability, Under Full Retirement Age 49,300 2,022 300 2,316 898 963 

Spouses and divorced spouses 141,200 638 1,200 532 465 343 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 145,700 1,061 500 1,458 910 743 

Widowed mothers and fathers 1,000 1,382 4/ 1,492 694 682 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 14,700 702 100 872 5/ 5/ 

Children 11,800 789 100 1,140 628 625 

Other survivors 100 757 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Benefit payments 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

August 

2005 

$5,180,000 

August 

2004 

$5,270,000 

Number 

123,600 

Average 

$42 500 

Number

$41 

Average 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement. 

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 35); about 300

 other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis. 

4

Fewer than 50. 

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers. 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. 

Regular retirement and survivor benefit payments total includes hospital insurance benefits for services in Canada. 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

August 2005 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Average payment 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period

 Per

 full week 

Unemployment 2,100 $498 $275 

Sickness 6,300 

August 2005 

498 

Benefit payments 

278 

August 2004 

Unemployment

Total 

2,006,000 

$6,341,000 $7,158,000

2,252,000 

Sickness 4,334,000 4,906,000 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited). Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.

 Recycled

 Paper 

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary
JUL 23 2615 

' - ;.
# table102_q12.3_size
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Susser Holdings Corporation (the Company) for the three months ended
April 4, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mary E. Sullivan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 14, 2010



/s/ Mary E. SullivanMary E. SullivanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Mick J. Miller, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Red Trail Energy, LLC;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andc) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:September 15, 2006                                         /s/ Mick J. Miller   Mick J. Miller   President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Affinion Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Todd H. Siegel,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: October 30, 2009                                            
|                                                                   
|/s/ Todd H. Siegel                                                 
|Todd H. Siegel Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 24-1100

TIGRESS MCDANIEL, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

GREEN DOT CORPORATION; GREEN DOT BANK; FINGERHUT; EXPERIAN 

DATA CORP.; EXPERIAN SERVICES CORP.; TRANSUNION DATA 

SOLUTIONS LLC; TRANSUNION LLC; WEBBANK, 

 Defendants - Appellees, 

 and 

BLUESTEM SALES, INC., 

 Defendant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:23-cv-00406-D-RN) 

Submitted: May 21, 2024 Decided: May 24, 2024 

Before WYNN and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1100 Doc: 29 Filed: 05/24/2024 Pg: 1 of 3
2 

Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se. Kristen Peters Watson, BURR & 

FORMAN, LLP, Birmingham, Alabama; Jonathan Harold Todt, FAEGRE DRINKER 

BIDDLE & REATH, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Caren D. Enloe, SMITH DEBNAM 

NARRON DRAKE SAINTSING & MYERS, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Camille R. 

Nicodemus, QUILLING SELANDER LOWNDS WINSLETT MOSER, Indianapolis, 

Indiana; Robert Cowan deRosset, IV, Christy Cochran Dunn, YOUNG MOORE & 

HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1100 Doc: 29 Filed: 05/24/2024 Pg: 2 of 3
3 

PER CURIAM: 

Tigress McDaniel seeks to appeal the district court’s order (a) denying McDaniel’s 

motions to amend her pro se complaint; (b) granting the motions to dismiss filed by all but 

one of the named Defendants and dismissing those claims with prejudice; and (c) directing 

McDaniel to show cause why the lone remaining Defendant, Bluestem Sales, Inc., should 

not be dismissed from the action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). 

The order that McDaniel seeks to appeal is neither a final order, given that litigation on her 

remaining claims is ongoing, nor is it an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED 

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1100 Doc: 29 Filed: 05/24/2024 Pg: 3 of 3