alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 oftitle 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of OsirisTherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to the best ofeach officer’s knowledge that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 30, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date: November 10, 2008 | /s/ C. RANDAL MILLS                          |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                         | C. Randal Mills, Ph.D.                       |
|                         | President & Chief Executive Officer |
|                         |                                         |
| Date: November 10, 2008 | /s/ RICHARD W. HUNT                          |
|                         | Richard W. Hunt                              |
|                         | Chief Financial Officer                      |

 

 

This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-Q towhich it relates, is not deemed filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filingof the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
Order filed July 21, 2015. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00288-CV

____________

IN RE ANTONIO SEPEDA, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

212th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 14-CV-0020

ORDER

On April 1, 2015, relator Antonio Sepeda filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. In the petition, relator asked this court to compel the 

Honorable Bret Griffin, former judge of the 212th District Court of Galveston

County, Texas, to hold a hearing and rule on relator’s petition for expunction in 

trial court cause number 14–CV–0020. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 55.02, 

§ 2(c) (the trial court “shall set a hearing” no sooner than 30 days after the filing of 

the petition). However, because Judge Griffin is no longer serving as judge of the 
212th District Court, we substituted Judge Patricia Grady—Judge Griffin’s 

successor—as respondent and abated this proceeding for 60 days to allow Judge 

Grady to consider relator’s petition for expunction. See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2.

It does not appear that any action has been taken by the trial court on 

relator’s petition for expunction since our order. Accordingly, we reinstate this 

original proceeding and request a response to the petition for writ of mandamus 

from respondent Judge Grady and from the Galveston County District Attorney. 

The response is due on or before August 14, 2015. 

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and McCally.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 123 (Monday, June 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15361]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1842-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]


Alabama; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1842-DR), dated June 3, and related 
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: June 19, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Alabama is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of June 3, 2009.

    Autauga, Elmore, and Montgomery Counties for Individual 
Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-15361 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
@conference{1211651,
  author = {Wesley Garey and Richard A. Rouil and Evan Black and Tanguy Ropitault and Weichao Gao},
  title = {O-RAN with Machine Learning in ns-3},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-06-28 04:06:00},
  publisher = {Workshop on ns-3 (WNS3) 2023, Ballston, VA, US},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936291},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3592149.3592157},
  language = {en},
}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000810994
<NAME> SOUTHEAST ACQUISITIONS I, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          91,596
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,596
<PP&E>                                       2,520,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,611,596
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,049
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,603,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,611,596
<SALES>                                         56,856
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,856
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,011,140
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (954,284)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (954,284)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]



# United States Court of Appeals

**For the First Circuit**

No. 99-1614 KEVIN LYNCH; KEVIN BABINEAU, Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v. SHEILA HUBBARD, Defendant, Appellee.

____________________ No. 99-1936 GARY R. DONAGHY, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. SHEILA HUBBARD, Defendant, Appellee.
APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge ] [Hon. George A. O’Toole, Jr., U.S. District Judge ]

Before Boudin, Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges .Kevin Lynch and Kevin Babineau on brief pro se.

G.R. Donaghy on brief pro se. Thomas F. Reilly , Attorney General, WilliamJ. Meade , Assistant Attorney General, and Joseph T. Thai , Assistant Attorney General, on briefs for appellee.-3- Per Curiam . Having reviewed these two cases in tandemdue to the overlap in issues, we affirm both judgments substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge O'Toole's opinion in No. 99-1614. See 47 F. Supp. 2d 125 (D. Mass. 1999). We add only the following comments.

In No. 99-1614, we need not decide whether the methodology prescribed by Sandi n v. Conner , 515 U.S. 472 (1995), is applicable in the parole context. As Judge O'Toole explained, whether one scrutinizes the parole statute for "mandatory language" and "substantive predicates," see , e.g. , Board of Pardons v. Allen , 482 U.S. 369 (1987), or whether one asks whether an "atypical and significant hardship" has been imposed for purposes of Sandin , plaintiffs' attempt to establish a liberty interest fails. The extent to which our decision in Hammv. Latessa , 72 F.3d 947, 954 (1 st Cir. 1995), resolved the issue of Sandin 's applicability need not here be determined.

In No. 99-1936, one of plaintiff's complaints is that the "full membership" of the Parole Board did not properly participate in his hearing. To the extent this claimrelies on equal protection, the dismissal thereof is summarily affirmed, inasmuch as plaintiff has not alleged-4-

any differential treatment of a protected class to which he belongs. To the extent this claim rests on state law, the dismissal is without prejudice to the pursuit of any available relief in state court.

In both cases, we find no need to address defendant's contention that, under Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 (1994), and related cases, plaintiffs' challenges to the Massachusetts parole procedures should have been pursued in a habeas action rather than in a suit under 28 U.S.C. § 1983. However the Heck issue might be resolved, it does not pose any concern as to our jurisdiction under Article III. Parella v. Retirement Bd. of the Rhode Island Employees' Retirement System , 173 F.3d 46, 54 (1 st Cir. 2000)

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Annual Report of Transpirator Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Raymond
J.  Romano,  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.



                         /s/ : Raymond  J.  Romano
                         -------------------------
                         Raymond  J.  Romano
                         Chief  Executive  Officer
                         Chief  Financial  Officer
                         June  27,  2003
@article{1214026,
  author = {Nathan Mahynski and Jared Ragland and Stacy Schuur and Vincent K. Shen},
  title = {Building Interpretable Machine Learning Models to Identify Chemometric Trends in Seabirds of the North Pacific Ocean},
  year = {2022},
  number = {56},
  month = {2022-10-05 04:10:00},
  publisher = {Environmental Science & Technology},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=934195},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c01894},
  language = {en},
}
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

February 19 , 2015.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00998

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A .A.J.C., A CHILD ,

On Appeal from the 257th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 63482

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed September 5, 2014. On February 12, 2015, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. Ap p. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Busby, and Brown.
July 17, 2015 

Via E-Filing

Christopher A. Prine, Clerk 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

301 Fannin, Room 245 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Re: Cause No. 14-15-00093-CV; State Farm Lloyds v. Ginger Hanson, in the 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Dear Mr. Prine:

This letter is e-filed to notify the Court that appellee Ginger Hanson wishes to and will file 

a response to Appellant State Farm Lloyds’ Opposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief, 

which was e-filed with the Court yesterday, July 16, 2015. 

Appellee will file her response today, July 17, 2015, no later than 2:00 p.m. Appellant has 

already filed three motions, the first two unopposed, for extension of time. Any further delay will 

prejudice Appellee, who received a favorable jury verdict in May 2014. 

 Sincerely,

 Ana M. Ene 

 

AME/ 

ACCEPTED

14-15-00093-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/17/2015 10:18:19 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/17/2015 10:18:19 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Order filed July 22, 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00129

- CV

____________ VALAIDA TARRY , Appellant

V.
MEMORIAL HERMANN HOS PITAL, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 4

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1029117



### O R D E R
Appellant’ s brief was due June 27, 2014

. No brief or motion for extension of
time has been filed.
Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before August 21, 2014
, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30573-30574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15185]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


President's Advisory Council for Faith-based and Neighborhood 
Partnerships

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee act (Pub. L. 92-463), the President's Advisory Council for 
Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships announces the following 
meeting:

    Name: Meeting of President's Advisory Council for Faith-based 
and Neighborhood Partnerships
    Dates: The meeting will be held on July 8-9th, 2009. For more 
information on meeting times please contact Mara Vanderslice at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5934382b38772f38373d3c2b2a35303a3c1931312a773e362f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d9b4b8abb8f7afb8b7bdbcabaab5b0babc99b1b1aaf7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Place: The meeting will take place at the White House.
    Status: Portions of the meeting will be open to the public, 
limited only by space available.
    Purpose: The Council brings together leaders and experts in 
fields related to the work of faith-based and neighborhood 
organizations in order to: Identify best practices and successful 
modes of delivering social services; evaluate the need for 
improvements in the implementation and coordination of public 
policies relating to faith-based and other neighborhood 
organizations and make recommendations for changes in policies, 
programs and practices.
    Summary: The President's Advisory Council for Faith-based and 
Neighborhood Partnerships will hold a Council meeting. Topics to be 
discussed include updates from Council subcommittees on Reform of 
the

[[Page 30574]]

Office, Economic Recovery, Fatherhood and Healthy Families, Inter-
religious Dialogue and Cooperation, Environment and Climate Change 
and Global Poverty and Development.
    For Further Information Contact: Mara Vanderslice, 202-205-2419, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b363a293a752d3a353f3e29283732383e1b333328753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="761b17041758001718121304051a1f1513361e1e0558111900">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 22, 2009.
Mara Vanderslice,
Special Assistant.
[FR Doc. E9-15185 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4154-07-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 712 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 712

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 19, 2019.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Brindisi.
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: Mr. Lamb.
    Resolved,  That the following named Members be, and are hereby, ranked as 
follows on the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Science, Space, and Technology: Mr. Lamb (to rank immediately 
after Ms. Wexton).
    Committee on Veterans Affairs: Mr. Brindisi (to rank immediately after Ms. 
Underwood).
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-15-00235-CV 

IN RE JOE ADAM RAMIREZ AND FREDERICK Q. HERROD, RELATORS 

 

OPINION ON ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

 

July 10, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Pending before the court is a petition for writ of mandamus filed by Joe Adam 

Ramirez and Frederick Q. Herrod. They request that we order the court reporter and 

the district clerk to provide them the appellate record in cause No. 07-15-00152-CV, the 

latter being an appeal pending before us. The clerk of this court mailed the appellate 

record to relators, which record was received, on June 11, 2015, by personnel at the 

prison wherein relators are housed. So, there is no need to order the trial court clerk 

and reporter to forward the same record. Thus, the complaint encompassed by the 

petition for mandamus is moot. However, we do not address whether the relators are 

entitled to a writ of mandamus against their jailers if the latter do not deliver the 

appellate record to relators; that happenstance has not been raised at this time. 
2

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.

Per Curiam
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 1 9
- 00333
- CR

__________________ VIRNA CATHERINE FENDER , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 19
- 338600

__________________________________________________________________
ORDER In a series of motions and notices filed after the parties filed their briefs for the appeal, the appellant, Virna Catherine Fender, asked this Court: (1) to strike the State’s brief as a fraud upon the court because the brief incorrectly stated that the

c ase was heard before a jury; (2) to allow her to “Amend the appeal”, which we interpret to be a request to correct briefing deficiencies; (3) to take judicial notice of her appeal from an administrative license suspension; and (4) t o direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding her motion to suppress2 evidence. The State amended its brief but did not file a response to Fender’s other motions

. In the interest of justice, we abate the appeal and remand the case to the tri al court for entry of written findings of fact and conclusions of law on the trial court’s essential findings on Fender’s motion to suppress evidence

. See State v. Cullen , 195 S.W.3d 696, 698

- 99 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). A supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings of fact a nd conclusions of law shall be filed with the Court of Appeals on or before September 10, 2020

. The appeal will be reinstated without further order of this Court when the supplemental clerk’s record is filed. The parties may file supplemental briefs that address th e trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.7. The appellant’s supplemental brief is due thirty days after the supplemental clerk’s record is filed. The State’s supplemental brief is due thirty days after the appellant f iles her supplemental brief. This Court will take judicial notice of Appeal Number 09

- 19

- 00338

- CV, but the clerk’s record file d in that appeal is not a part of and will not be considered as the record of this appeal. See State v. Clammer , 999 S.W.2d 903, 9 06 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 1999, pet. ref’d) (the appellate court reviews the trial court’s judgment based upon the evidence before the trial court at the time it made the decision complained of.). All other requested pre

- submission relief is denied.
ORDER EN TERED August 11 , 2020.3 PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.