alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.0**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterlyperiod ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1.                        TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2.                        Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Companyas of and for the period covered by the Report. 
|        | By:    | /s/ Thomas M. Petro                               |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   Thomas M. Petro                       |
|   |   |   President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |   May 14, 2007                          |
|   |   |                                              |
|   | By:    | /s/ Jerry D. Holbrook                             |
|   |   |   Jerry D. Holbrook                     |
|   |   |   Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
|   |   |   May 14, 2007                          |

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-85866, 333-63855, 333-34197 and 333-34050) pertaining to
the Atlantis Plastics, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan, the Atlantis Plastics,
Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan, the Atlantis Plastics, Inc. 1997 Stock Option
Plan and the Atlantis Plastics, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, respectively,
of our report dated February 13, 2004, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Atlantis Plastics, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003. Atlanta, Georgia
March 24, 2004 -53-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER AMENDING RULES 1901.3, : NO. 674

1901.6, 1905, 1910.4, 1910.7, 1910.11, :

1910.27, 1915.3, 1915.4

- 4, 1915.7, : CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES

1915.15, 1915.17, 1915.1 8, 1920.13, :

1920.15, 1920.31, 1920.33, 1920.75, : DOCKET

1930.1, 1930.6, 1953, AND 1959 OF THE :

PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF CIVIL :

PROCEDURE :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5 th day of January, 2018 , upon the recommendation of the

Domestic Relations Procedural Rules Committee ; the proposal having been published

for public comment in the Pennsylvania Bulletin

, 47 Pa.B. 4664 ( August 12 , 2017 ) :

It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania

that Rule s 1901.3, 1901.6, 1905, 1910.4, 1910.7, 1910.11, 1910.27, 1915.3, 1915.4

- 4,

1915.7, 1915.15, 1915.17, 1915.18, 1920.13, 1920.15, 1920.31, 1920.33, 1920.75,

1930.1, 1930.6, 1953, and 1959 of the Pe nnsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure are

amended in the attached form.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b ), and shall

be effective on January 6, 2018

.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
#### MARTIN v. SOUTHERN RY. CO. BOLING v. SAME (two cases).

Nos. 25-27.

District Court, E. D. Tennessee.

April 4, 1939.

John W. Morton, of Maryville, Tenn., and R. R. Kramer, of Knoxville, Tenn., for plaintiffs.

Cates, Smith & Long, of Knoxville, Tenn., for defendant.

TAYLOR, District Judge.

It appearing that the defendant has incurred expense in the sum of $30 by way of deductions from its deposit for costs in three cases involving the same cause of action between the same parties heretofore voluntarily non suited by the plaintiffs, the motion of the defendant in each of the above styled cases to require the plaintiff to pay the costs of said former actions as a condition precedent to further prosecution of these suits is granted to the extent that plaintiffs be required to reimburse the defendant in the amount of $10 incurred by it in each of said non suited former actions, said reimbursement to occur within fifteen days of the filing of this memorandum. If said costs are not paid within said fifteen-day period, these cases will stand dismissed without further order.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-13-00946-CR

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 1362831

Style: Julio Francisco Galvan

v The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: February 3, 2015

Type of motion: Motion to Reconsider Granting Oral Argument

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted:

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: 

Judge's signature: __/s/_Terry Jennings

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of 

Date: July 16, 2015
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 9, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Richard
              A. RappaportRichard
              A. Rappaport
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              August
                8, 2006
# Field Descriptions

# 2015 Nonprofit Data
Exhibit 10.4
 AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT
  WHEREAS
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE
 1.
    
    Section 12.1 of the Agreement is amended and restated to read as follows:Section 12.1 Redemption, Sale to Substitute Stockholder.Upon the occurrence of any of the following events, the shares held by any
then-current stockholder of the Practice will automatically be redeemed by the
Practice, and the Practice, without the need for any further action by any
Practice stockholder, officer or director, will immediately sell such shares to an
individual who is qualified to hold such shares under Delaware law:




---



##### 



2.
    
    Section 12.2 of the Agreement is amended and restated to read as follows:Section 12.2 Conduct of Business Following Redemption. In the case of
redemption by the Practice as a result of any of the events described in Section
12.1, the Practice agrees that it will conduct its business in the ordinary course
and will comply with all obligations which it is subject to, including, but not
limited to this Management Agreement and all client agreements.




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC
CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Robert C. KillTitle:
    
    President and Chief Executive OfficerVIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC
PROFESSIONALS OF MICHIGAN, P.C.By:
    
    /s/ Eduard Michel, M.D.Title:
    
    President/s/
Eduard Michel, M.D.Eduard Michel, M.D.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 127 (Monday, July 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15752]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,543]


Mercedes-Benz, MBUSI, 1 Mercedes Drive,Vance, AL; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on May 26, 2009 in response to a worker 
petition filed on behalf of workers of Mercedes-Benz, MBUSI, Vance, 
Alabama.
    The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition 
(TA-W-70,272) filed on May 20, 2009 that is the subject of an ongoing 
investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 11th day of June 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-15752 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 31.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Chief Financial Officer Certification
Pursuant To Section 302 Of 
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

|I, Robert S. Johnson, certify that:
|-----------------------------------
|                                   
|1.                                 
|                                   
|2.                                 
|                                   
|3.                                 
|                                   
|4.                                 
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|5.                                 
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   



|September 26, 2006 | /s/ Robert S. Johnson  
|------------------ | -----------------------
|                   | Robert S. Johnson      
|                   | Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of theundersigned officers of Osiris Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), doeshereby certify, to the best of each officer’s knowledge that:

 

The Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”)of the Company fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Date: August 6, 2010 | /s/ C. RANDAL MILLS                           |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                      | C. Randal Mills, Ph.D.                        |
|                      | President & Chief  Executive Officer |
|                      |                                          |
| Date: August 6, 2010 | /s/ PHILIP R. JACOBY, JR.                     |
|                      | Philip R. Jacoby, Jr.                    |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer                       |

 

This certification “accompanies”the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the UnitedStates Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether madebefore or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing.

 

1

----
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT    
  


THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is made and entered into this 1st day of November, by Ross Stores, Inc. (the
"Company") and James Peters (the "Executive"). The Executive and the Company previously entered into an Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") effective August 14, 2000 (attached hereto) and it
is now the intention of the Executive and the Company to amend the Agreement as set forth below. Accordingly, the Executive and the Company now enter into this Amendment. 


	I.
	The
Executive and the Company hereby amend the Agreement by deleting Paragraph 9 (c) (i) of the Agreement in its entirety and by replacing it with the following new
paragraph 9 (c) (i):



	(i)
	Lump Sum Payment. The Company shall pay to the Executive (or his designee or estate), immediately
upon such termination, a lump sum amount equal to: (A) the sum of the Executive's then current salary and the greater of the most recent bonus paid to the Executive under the Management
Incentive Plan or the target bonus for the fiscal year of the Company in which such termination occurs; times (B) the greater of two or the number of years (including partial years computed on
a per day basis) remaining in the term of the Agreement under paragraph 1 (as extended pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 4(b)). The Executive will not receive the additional salary (i.e., $1,500,000
for two years) described in paragraph 4 (b) {Change of Control} as part of this lump sum payment. Rather, the additional salary provided in paragraph 4(b) will be paid over two
years in accordance with the Company's normal payroll policies applicable to senior officers. 







	II.
	The
Executive and the Company further amend the Agreement by adding Paragraph 9 (c) (iv) to the Agreement:



	(iv)
	Estate Planning. In the event of the termination of Executive's employment following a Change of
Control, then Executive shall also be entitled to the reimbursement of the Executive's estate planning expenses (including attorneys' fees) as to which and on the terms of which Executive was entitled
prior to the termination for a period of two (2) years following the date of termination of employment. 






    Except
for the amendments, as set forth above, the Agreement and all of its terms remain in force and in effect. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment to the Agreement as of            ,
effective            through
            . 



	ROSS STORES, INC.	 	EXECUTIVE
	

/s/ Michael Balmuth
	
 	

/s/ James Peters

	Michael Balmuth, Vice Chairman and CEO	 	James Peters, President and COO
	

11/01/01
 Date	
 	

11/11/01
 Date











QuickLinks


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
Filed 10/17/06 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2006 ND 200

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Grady Jackson, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20060034

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Burt L. Riskedahl, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Susan Schmidt, 400 East Broadway Avenue, Suite 27, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for defendant and appellant; on brief.

Lloyd Clayton Suhr, Assistant State’s Attorney, Burleigh County Courthouse, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.

State v. Jackson

No. 20060034

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Grady Jackson appeals from a criminal judgment after a district court found him guilty of driving under suspension.  Jackson argues law enforcement had no reasonable and articulable suspicion to justify a traffic stop and insufficient evidence supported his conviction.

[¶2]We hold the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence that was obtained after a law enforcement officer observed Jackson’s erratic driving, prompting a reasonable stop.  Adequate evidence existed to support the conviction.  We therefore affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).  

[¶3]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - January 2002 

Regular Retirement 

and Survivor Benefits 

Benefit payments January 2002 

Total 

Retired employees 

Spouses and divorced spouses 

Widow(er)s - aged and disabled 

Other survivors 

January 2001 

$706,757,000 $701,083,000 

446,712,000 440,119,000 

87,032,000 87,747,000 

21,142,000 20,953,000 

151,871,000 152,262,000 

Number Average1 Number Average1 

Total 649,700 ......... 2,300 ......... ......... 

Regular employee annuities, total 297,300 $1,489 900 $2,066 ......... 

Age 216,600 1,450 2 200 2 2,489 3 $1,167 

Disability, age 65 and over 37,400 1,343 ......... ......... ......... 

Disability, under age 65 43,300 1,812 400 2,144 

Spouses and divorced spouses 152,400 564 600 654 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 170,500 892 800 1,055 

Widowed mothers and fathers 1,100 1,104 4/ 1,099 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 15,200 622 100 634 

Children 13,100 726 4/ 911 

Other survivors 100 601 ......... ......... ......... 

Average under 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded in 

month 

Social Security 

Monthly benefits January 2002

Being Paid Awarded 

......... 

......... 

$876 

......... 

611 639 

815 879 

430 329 

......... 

5/ / 

573 603 

829 754 

5

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

Benefit payments 

January January 

2002 2001 Number Average 

$5,546,000 $5,863,000 131,100 $42 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Number Average 

400 $41 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement.

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 35); some 200

other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis.

4

Fewer than 50.

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers.

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.

Regular retirement and survivor benefit payments total includes hospital insurance benefits for services in Canada.

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

January 2002 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Unemployment 8,700 $247.30 

Sickness 8,000 247.85 

Unemployment 

Sickness 

Average payment 

Per 

full week 

$419.59 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period 

440.27 

January 2002 

Benefit payments 

January 2001 

Total $13,293,000 $12,275,000 

6,810,000 7,449,000 

6,483,000 4,826,000 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. 

Recycled 

Paper 

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary and the Office of Public Affairs
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 821 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 821

   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to establish a 
                  Permanent Select Committee on Aging.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2020

Mr. Cicilline submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to establish a 
                  Permanent Select Committee on Aging.

    Resolved, That rule X of the Rules of the House of Representatives 
is amended by adding at the end the following new clause:
``Permanent Select Committee on Aging
    ``12. There is established a Permanent Select Committee on Aging 
which shall not have legislative jurisdiction but which shall have 
jurisdiction--
            ``(1) to conduct a continuing comprehensive study and 
        review of the problems of the older American, including but not 
        limited to income maintenance, poverty, housing, health 
        (including medical research), welfare, employment, education, 
        recreation, and long-term care;
            ``(2) to study the use of all practicable means and methods 
        of encouraging the development of public and private programs 
        and policies which will assist the older American in taking a 
        full part in national life and which will encourage the 
        utilization of the knowledge, skills, special aptitudes, and 
        abilities of older Americans to contribute to a better quality 
        of life for all Americans;
            ``(3) to develop policies that would encourage the 
        coordination of both governmental and private programs designed 
        to deal with problems of aging; and
            ``(4) to review any recommendations made by the President 
        or by the White House Conference on aging relation to programs 
        or policies affecting older Americans.''.
                                 <all>
```