alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Clifford A. Reid,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Complete Genomics, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Complete Genomics, Inc.



|    |  |                            |  |                        
|--- |  | -------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Clifford A. Reid Ph.D.
|    |  | Name:                      |  | Clifford A. Reid Ph.D. 
|    |  | Title:                     |  | Chief Executive Officer

Date: December 22,
2010

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), has been provided to Complete Genomics, Inc. and will be retained by Complete Genomics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Complete Genomics, Inc. under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q REPORTOF SECURITY CAPITAL ASSURANCE LTDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §§1350(a) and (b))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. SS.SS. 1350(a) and (b)), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
  for the period ended September 30, 2007 of Security Capital Assurance Ltd (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
  1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                                                    
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Dated: November 14, 2007                                                           
| |  | /s/ Paul S. Giordano                                                               
| |  | PAUL S. GIORDANOPresident and Chief Executive OfficerSecurity Capital Assurance Ltd

| |  |                                                                                                
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Dated: November 14, 2007                                                                       
| |  | /s/ David P. Shea                                                                              
| |  | DAVID P. SHEAExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerSecurity Capital Assurance Ltd

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
  electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Security Capital Assurance Ltd and will be retained by Security Capital Assurance Ltd and furnished to the
  Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification of Periodic Financial Report**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

Forpurposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Dannette Henning, the ChiefFinancial Officer of Integrated Management Information, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to her knowledge:

 

(i)             the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30,2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)          the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  November 12, 2010              |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/  Dannette Henning                      |   |
| Dannette  Henning, Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
#### In the Matter of Samuel A. Garrasi and Mary H. Garrasi Family Revocable Trust. G. Robert Garrasi, as Cotrustee of the Samuel A. Garrasi and Mary H. Garrasi Family Revocable Trust, Appellant, et al., Respondent; Sallie Hume Garrasi, Respondent.

Submitted July 15, 2013;

decided September 12, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.106


                    AMENDMENT NO.2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


        THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into as of this 31st day of December,
1995, by and between MICHAEL FOODS, INC., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter
referred to as "Michael Foods"), and GREGG A. OSTRANDER (hereinafter referred
to as "Ostrander").

        WHEREAS, Michael Foods and Ostrander have heretofore entered into an
employment agreement dated as of January 31, 1994; and

        WHEREAS, said employment agreement was amended (Amendment No. 1) as of
December 31, 1994; and 

        WHEREAS, Michael Foods and Ostrander desire to amend Sections 2 and 3
of said agreement to amend and clarify certain terms thereof.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the terms and
conditions set forth, the parties agree as follows:


        1.  Section 2 of the employment agreement between Michael Foods and
Ostrander dated January 31, 1994 is hereby amended by substituting the
following for the phrase "shall continue through December 31, 1996":

              shall continue through December 31, 1997



        2.  Section 3 of the employment agreement between Michael Foods and
Ostrander dated January 31, 1994 is hereby amended by substituting the
following for the phrase "for each of the calendar years of this Agreement from
January 1, 1994 through December 31, 1996 of at least $280,000":

              for each of the calendar years of this Agreement from January 1,
              1996 through December 31, 1997 of at least $309,000

Except as otherwise provided herein, the employment agreement between Michael
Foods and Ostrander dated January 31, 1994 shall remain in full force and
effect.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the date
and year above written.

                                          MICHAEL FOODS, INC.

                                          By /s/  Mark D. Witmer
                                             ------------------------
                                            Its ASSISTANT TREASURER
                                                ---------------------

                                             /s/ Gregg A. Ostrander
                                             ------------------------
                                               GREGG A. OSTRANDER







                                      1
Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE 194TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 12th day of May, 2015, the 

cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between

STAFFON LADARIUS-DELA SPARKS, 

Appellant

No. 05-14-00629-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-0825612-M.

Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill. 

Justices Francis and Lang-Miers 

participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed.

WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with 

the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 22nd day of July, 2015.

LISA MATZ, Clerk
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Douglas Toth, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of Bizzingo, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2011, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                     



| | By: | /s/
    Douglas Toth           
| | --- | -------------------------------
| |     | Chief
    Executive Officer and
| |     | Chief
    Financial Officer    
| |     | October
    11, 2011
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 CECILE FOY GSANGER

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

July 22, 2015

Hon. Marc Hamlin

District Clerk

300 E. 26th St., Suite 216

Bryan, TX 77803-5360

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-13-00080-CR

Tr.Ct.No. 12-01541-CRF-85

Style: JESSE TIRADO LOPEZ v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

The judgment of the trial court was AFFIRMED by this Court on the 12th day of 

February, 2015. The mandate is enclosed.

Tex R. App. P. 51.2(a)(1) provides that the clerk of the trial court shall send an 

acknowledgment to the clerk of the appellate court of the receipt of the mandate. Please review 

the requirements of Tex. R. App. P. 51.2(b) regarding the issuance of a capias in cases in which 

the trial court’s judgment is affirmed and the defendant is not in custody.

Please sign the attached acknowledgment of receipt of the mandate and submit through 

the TAMES Records Submission Portal (RSP) as soon as possible.

Very truly yours,

Cecile Foy Gsanger, Clerk

CFG:ch

Enc.

cc: Hon. Richard W. B. 'Rick' Davis (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Jessica Escue (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Jarvis Parsons (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

I hereby acknowledge receipt of the mandate in cause no. 13-13-00080-CR this 

________ day of _________________, 2015.

District/County Clerk, 

By :____________________________
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Ajay Bansal, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Complete Genomics, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Complete Genomics, Inc.



|    |  |                 |  |                        
|--- |  | --------------- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Ajay Bansal
|    |  | Name:           |  | Ajay Bansal            
|    |  | Title:          |  | Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 9, 2011

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), has been provided to Complete Genomics, Inc. and will be retained by Complete Genomics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Complete Genomics, Inc. under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00176-CR

RON EASTON D/B/A ACE BAIL BONDS,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the County Court

Freestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5513

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Ron Easton d/b/a Ace Bail Bonds appealed the trial court’s entry of a 

default judgment. Appellant now files a motion to dismiss his appeal, stating that the 

appeal is moot because the trial court granted a motion for new trial and amended its 

judgment. 

The motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). 

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
Easton v. State of Texas Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted

Opinion delivered and filed July 16, 2015

[CV06]
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
and amendments thereto:
 
<TABLE>
<S>                            <C>
Form S-8 No. 33-61269          PMSI and Insta-Care Stock Option Plans
Form S-8 No. 33-55571          Nonemployee Directors' Stock Option Plan and
                                 Certain ATH Option Plans
Form S-8 No. 33-21505          Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Form S-4 No. 33-13243          1985 Beverly Nonqualified Stock Option Plan
Form S-8 No. 33-65242          1993 Long-Term Incentive Plan
Form S-3 No. 33-50965          Debt Securities of Beverly Enterprises, Inc.
</TABLE>
 
and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated February 2, 1996, except for
Note 4, paragraph 5 and Note 5, paragraph 5, as to which the date is March 21,
1996, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Beverly Enterprises, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1995.
 
                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Little Rock, Arkansas
March 22, 1996
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of HIGH END VENTURES, INC., a Colorado corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Thomas Forzani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Nadir Walji, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C.  1350), that to his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Thomas Forzani

Thomas Forzani, Chief Executive Officer

April 16, 2007



/s/ Nadir Walji

Nadir Walji, Secretary/Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer



April 30, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HIGH END VENTURES, INC. and will be retained by HIGH END VENTURES, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.15

                            UltraStrip Systems, inc.

                                Promissory Note

$517,893.00                                                           Stuart, Fl
                                                                  March 16, 2001

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ULTRASTRIP SYSTEMS, INC. a Florida Corporation (the
"Maker"), promises to pay on demand to KEVIN P. GRADY (the "holder"), the
principle sum of five hundred seventeen thousand, eight hundred ninety-three
dollars ($517,893.00) at 14640 Marvin Lane, Fort Lauderdale, Fl 33330.

If this Note is not paid within five days of demand then interest shall accrue
from the demand date at the prime rate. If suit is brought to collect this
Note, the Holder shall be entitled to collect all costs and expenses of suit,
including, but not limited to, attorney's fees.

The Maker may prepay the principal amount outstanding in whole or in part.

Presentment, notice of dishonor and protest are hereby waived by all makers,
sureties, guarantors, and endorsers hereof. This Note shall be the joint and
several obligation of all makers, sureties, guarantors, and endorsers, and
shall be binding upon them and their successors and assigns.



                                       ULTRASTRIP SYSTEMS, INC.



                                       By: /s/ Jacqueline McGuire
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name: Jacqueline McGuire
                                               ---------------------------------
                                          Title: Sr. V.P. of Administration
                                                --------------------------------
#### Leeward Isles Resorts, Limited, Respondent, v Charles C. Hickox, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 41]

*278The 1989 loan agreement between defendant creditor’s assignor and plaintiff guarantor’s principal, which significantly increased the amounts extended under the 1986 loan agreement by defendant’s assignor to plaintiffs principal, and expressly “supersede^] and replaced]” the 1986 loan agreement, did not merely modify the 1986 loan agreement, as defendant argues, but constituted a novation thereof *(see Northville Indus. Corp. v Fort Neck Oil Terms. Corp.,*100 AD2d 865, 867 [1984], *affd*64 NY2d 930 [1985]; *compare CrossLand Fed. Sav. Bank v A. Suna & Co., Inc.,*935 F Supp 184, 199 [ED NY 1996] [modifications only as to the time of payment and rate of interest did not constitute a novation]). Thus, plaintiffs 1987 guaranty of the 1986 loan agreement is unenforceable *(see Bier Pension Plan Trust v Estate of Schneierson,*74 NY2d 312, 315 [1989]; *Flaum v Birnbaum,*120 AD2d 183, 192 [1986]). There is no merit to defendant’s argument that the 1986 loan agreement could not be extinguished without plaintiffs consent. Plaintiff was only a guarantor of that loan, not a party to it. We have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur-Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60197

 Conference Calendar 

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM DARRELL ANDERSON,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi 

USDC No. 4:94-CR-4-BN

- - - - - - - - - -

June 27, 1995

Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant William Darrell Anderson has filed motions for the

appointment of counsel and for preparation of transcripts at

government expense. The motions are DENIED and the appeal is

DISMISSED.

After being convicted of a federal offense, Anderson was

sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment and to supervised

release. The judgment was entered August 23, 1994. Anderson did

not appeal from the judgment of conviction, but on December 27,
No. 95-60197

-2-

1994, he filed a motion dated December 19, 1994, requesting leave

to file an out-of-time notice of appeal therefrom and his

sentencing transcripts. 

A convicted defendant has ten days after entry of the

judgment of conviction and sentence in which to file a notice of

appeal therefrom. The time for filing the notice can be extended

30 days in the event of excusable neglect. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). 

Because Anderson's motion for leave to file an out-of-time notice

of appeal was not filed within 40 (10 + 30) days after entry of

the judgment of conviction, the district court lacked

jurisdiction to entertain the motion. See United States v.

Lewis, 921 F.2d 563, 564-65 (5th Cir. 1991). 

MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Affinion Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Todd H. Siegel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 29, 2009                               
|                                                    
|/s/ Todd H. Siegel                                  
|Todd H. Siegel                                      
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer