30330 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 121 / Thursday, June 25, 2009 / Notices 

The workers’ firm does not produce 

an article as required for certification 

under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 

1974. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been 

met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is not a supplier to or a downstream 

producer for a firm whose workers were 

certified eligible to apply for TAA. 

None. 

I hereby certify that the 

aforementioned determinations were 

issued during the period of June 8 

through June 12, 2009. Copies of these 

determinations are available for 

inspection in Room N–5428, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 

during normal business hours or will be 

mailed to persons who write to the 

above address. 

Dated: June 19, 2009. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9–14969 Filed 6–24–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility to Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers (TA–W) number and alternative 

trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by 

(TA–W) number issued during the 

period of April 6 through April 10, 2009. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of section 222(a) 

of the Act must be met. 

I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following 

must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. The sales or production, or both, of 

such firm or subdivision have decreased 

absolutely; and 

C. Increased imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles 

produced by such firm or subdivision 

have contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in sales or 

production of such firm or subdivision; 

or 

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the 

following must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. There has been a shift in 

production by such workers’ firm or 

subdivision to a foreign country of 

articles like or directly competitive with 

articles which are produced by such 

firm or subdivision; and 

C. One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

1. The country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles is a party to a free trade 

agreement with the United States; 

2. The country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles to a beneficiary country under 

the Andean Trade Preference Act, 

African Growth and Opportunity Act, or 

the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery 

Act; or 

3. There has been or is likely to be an 

increase in imports of articles that are 

like or directly competitive with articles 

which are or were produced by such 

firm or subdivision. 

Also, in order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for 

secondarily affected workers of a firm 

and a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of section 222(b) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) Significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is a supplier or downstream producer to 

a firm (or subdivision) that employed a 

group of workers who received a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

trade adjustment assistance benefits and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article that was the basis for such 

certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied for 

the firm (or subdivision) described in 

paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 

percent of the production or sales of the 

workers’ firm; or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm (or subdivision) 

described in paragraph (2) contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance to issue a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, 

the group eligibility requirements of 

section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

must be met. 

1. Whether a significant number of 

workers in the workers’ firm are 50 

years of age or older. 

2. Whether the workers in the 

workers’ firm possess skills that are not 

easily transferable. 

3. The competitive conditions within 

the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions 

within the industry are adverse). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–65,273; Sherico Cedar Products, 

Forks, WA: February 2, 2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–65,613; Whitehall Mfg, Whitehall 

East Div., a/k/a Thermo-Electric, 

Imperial, PA: March 16, 2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

None. 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 121 / Thursday, June 25, 2009 / Notices 30331 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and 

section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–65,387; Croscill Acquisition, 

LLC, Durham, NC: April 6, 2009. 

TA–W–65,334; PGP Corporation, DBA 

Voss Industries, Taylor, MI: 

February 20, 2008. 

TA–W–65,440; Fibermark, North 

America, Sears Way Division/FKA 

Permalin Mfg., West Springfield, 

MA: February 27, 2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and 

section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–65,341; Eljer, Inc., Dicker 

Staffing, Dallas, TX: February 19, 

2008. 

TA–W–65,420; Millet Industries, 

Bushnell Outdoor Products, 

Huntington Beach, CA: February 25, 

2008. 

TA–W–65,507; Arcelor Mittal Marion, 

Inc., Tubular Products, Marion, OH: 

March 4, 2008. 

TA–W–65,373; Qimonda North America 

Corporation, Cary, NC: February 23, 

2008. 

TA–W–65,355; Normark Innovations, 

Inc., dba Luhr Jensen Custom 

Fishing Lures, Bingen, WA: April 6, 

2009. 

TA–W–65,430; Niles America Wintech, 

Inc., Winchester, KY: February 26, 

2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade 

Act have been met. 

TA–W–65,045A; Parkdale America, 

LLC—Plant #40, Parkdale Mills, 

Inc., Plant #40, Graniteville, SC: 

March 22, 2009. 

TA–W–65,045; Parkdale America, LLC— 

Plant #10, Servesource and 

Defender Services, Gastonia, NC: 

January 26, 2008. 

TA–W–65,209; Spartan Light Metal 

Products, Sparta, IL: February 9, 

2008. 

TA–W–65,221; A1 Polishing: Finishing, 

Inc., New Holstein, WI: February 10, 

2008. 

TA–W–65,413; Topy America, Inc., Steel 

Wheel Division, Frankfort, KY: 

February 25, 2008. 

TA–W–65,657; Prescotech Industries, 

Inc., Fort Smith, AR: March 20, 

2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) and Section 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, it has been 

determined that the requirements of 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for 

the reasons specified. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (1) of section 246 has not been 

met. The firm does not have a 

significant number of workers 50 years 

of age or older. 

TA–W–65,273; Sherico Cedar Products, 

Forks, WA. 

TA–W–65,613; Whitehall Mfg, Whitehall 

East Div., a/k/a Thermo-Electric, 

Imperial, PA. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Workers at the firm possess skills 

that are easily transferable. 

None. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (3) of section 246 has not been 

met. Competition conditions within the 

workers’ industry are not adverse. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

Because the workers of the firm are 

not eligible to apply for TAA, the 

workers cannot be certified eligible for 

ATAA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) 

(employment decline) have not been 

met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 

production, or both, did not decline) 

and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production 

to a foreign country) have not been met. 

TA–W–64,927; Anheuser-Busch Inc., St. 

Louis, MO. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 

imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 

production to a foreign country) have 

not been met. 

TA–W–64,622; Napco, Inc., Div. of Ply 

Gem Siding Group, Valencia, PA. 

TA–W–65,052; General Motors 

Corporation, Truck Division, 

Wentzville Assembly Center, 

Wentzville, MO. 

TA–W–65,123; Key Tronic Corp., 

Spokane Valley, WA. 

TA–W–65,349; Columbia Forest 

Products, Inc., Newport, VT. 

TA–W–65,433; American Racing 

Equipment, LLC, Denver, CO. 

TA–W–65,450; Akzo Nobel Coatings, 

Inc., High Point, NC. 

TA–W–65,454; Mid Columbia Lumber 

Products, LLC, Madras, OR. 

TA–W–65,530; Zosel Lumber Company, 

Oroville, WA. 

TA–W–64,184; Protient, Inc., Norfolk, 

NE. 

The workers’ firm does not produce 

an article as required for certification 

under section 222 of the Trade Act of 

1974. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria of section 222(b)(2) has not been 

met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is not a supplier to or a downstream 

producer for a firm whose workers were 

certified eligible to apply for TAA. 

None. 

I hereby certify that the 

aforementioned determinations were 

issued during the period of April 6, 

through April 10, 2009. Copies of these 

determinations are available for 

inspection in Room N–5428, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 

during normal business hours or will be 

mailed to persons who write to the 

above address. 

Dated: June 19, 2009. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9–14970 Filed 6–24–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE 

ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES 

National Endowment for the Arts; 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

June 10, 2009. 

The National Endowment for the Arts 

(NEA) has submitted the following 

public information collection request 

(ICR) to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for review and approval 

in accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 [Pub. L. 104–13, 

44 U.S.C. Chapter 35]. Copies of this 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES