alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 772 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                  House Calendar No. 64
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 772

                          [Report No. 116-357]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5377) to amend the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the limitation on deduction of 
             State and local taxes, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2019

   Mrs. Torres, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5377) to amend the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the limitation on deduction of 
             State and local taxes, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5377) to amend the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the limitation on deduction of 
State and local taxes, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against consideration of the bill are waived. The amendment in the 
nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means 
now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 
amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against 
provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any 
further amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the 
chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; 
and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
                                                  House Calendar No. 64

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 772

                          [Report No. 116-357]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5377) to amend the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the limitation on deduction of 
             State and local taxes, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 19, 2019

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), J.Timothy Bryan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company (principal executiveofficer), and Dennis Schmitt, Senior Vice President - Finance (principalfinancial and accounting officer), each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of their knowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| /s/  J. TIMOTHY BRYAN                                    |     | /s/ DENNIS  SCHMITT                                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| J. Timothy Bryan                                         |     | Dennis Schmitt                                                                     |
| *Chief Executive Officer  (principal executive officer)* | * * | *Senior Vice President—Finance  (principal financial and accounting officer)* |
| August 14, 2007                                     |     | August 14, 2007                                                               |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350),has been provided to ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited and will beretained by ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. Thiscertification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is notdeemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of ICO Global Communications(Holdings) Limited under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after thedate of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporationlanguage contained in such filing.

----
PD -mi 9-1 R PD-0319-15 JTU UJir 1J COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 7/17/2015 5:59:54 PM

Accepted 7/21/2015 9:14:11 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

LAURA KNIGHT clerk

219DOLANST. o n i

EL PASO, TEXAS 79905 ^ ^T

Telephone Number (915)471-7498 p /^

E-Mail Address: Salomelknighl3714@att.net w *

July 17, 2015 y/sy/zo/s

FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS

Clerk of the Court July 21, 2015

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

209 West 14th St. Suite 106

Austin, Texas 78701 ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK

Re: 4th Request for Extension ofTime to file Appellant Brief

PRD Number 0319-15

LAURA KNIGHT

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee

APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW of the

EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS JUDGMENT in No. 08-12-00355-CR

Affirming conviction in Cause No. 20090D02461 from the

346th Judicial District Court ofEl Paso County, Texas

Dear Sir:

My name is Laura Knight and I am attempting to file a "pro-se" appeal for discretionary

review in your court.

I am inthe process ofdeveloping and writing my appeal for discretionary review in your

court of my criminal conviction. I have discovered the difference between a "direct

appeal" asfrom my trial court to the 8th Court ofAppeals and realized that your rules for

a discretionary appeal makes the appeal totally different from a direct appeal.

This isa learning process for me as 1am not anattorney. Nonetheless, I do notwant to

lose my opportunity to be able to appeal my case to your court. I regret that I am not as

fast as an experience lawyer and I need time. I respectfully ask that you please allow me

to have a 4lh extension oftime as to the due date for filing an appellant's brief.
I am working to make sure that my discretionary appeal complies with your rules and

Texas law. I do not want to lose my appeal on a technical point.

For the foregoing reason 1am not finish with my brief. Ineed more time to finish my

brief and submit the same to your court. I am doing the best with what resources 1have.

I am asking for an extension to meet my obligations with your appellate requirements.

By this letter Irequest an extension ofat least 30 days to file my appellant's brief.

Respectfully,

(^O^J^^^^T

Laura Knight
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                             |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Grant R.White        |
| Grant R.White                                                    |
| Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer              |
| October 12, 2010                                                 |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dana Middleton, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 459]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 16, 2005 *(People v Middleton,*18 AD3d 670 [2005]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 22, 2003.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Florio, J.P, Krausman, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To the Board of Directors of Cineplex Odeon Corporation
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration 
Statements (Numbers 33-19713 and 33-86878) on Forms S-8 of 
Cineplex Odeon Corporation (the "Corporation") of our 
reports dated February 18, 1997, relating to the 
consolidated balance sheets of the Corporation as at 
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated 
statements of income and changes in shareholders' equity and 
cash resources for each of the years in the three year 
period ended December 31, 1996, and the related schedule, 
which reports appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of 
the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1996.

KPMG

Chartered Accountants

Toronto, Canada
March 10, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,718
<SECURITIES>                                       406
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                       715
<INVENTORY>                                      6,036
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,122
<PP&E>                                         868,299
<DEPRECIATION>                                 288,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 644,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,550
<BONDS>                                        246,118
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       555,374
<OTHER-SE>                                   (336,794)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   644,171
<SALES>                                        126,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               509,692
<CGS>                                           22,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  440,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                63,217
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   320
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,482
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,692)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,390
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (31,082)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (31,082)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





The Board of Directors
FirstFed Financial Corp.:





We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements (No.
333-33463;033-63207) on Form S-8 of FirstFed Financial Corp. of our report dated
January  28,  2004,  relating  to the  consolidated  balance  sheet of  FirstFed
Financial  Corp.  and  subsidiary  as of  December  31,  2003,  and the  related
consolidated  statements  of income,  changes in  stockholders'  equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the  two-year  period  ended  December  31, 2003,
which  report  appears in the  December  31, 2004 annual  report on Form 10-K of
FirstFed Financial Corp.


                                    KPMG LLP





Los Angeles, California
March 10, 2005
#### Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. *v.*Texas & P. Ry. Co., (Dehoney, Intervenor.)1

*(Circuit Court, E. D. Louisiana.*

January 2, 1888.)

Reference—Proof of Damages—Exceptions.

Tlie intervenor filed a claim against defendant company for damages. The evidence was not sufficiently certain as to the extent of the damage. *Held*that, as the complainant should have made his case and the extent of his damage reasonably certain by proof, his exceptions to the master’s findings against his claim should be overruled, and the master’s report confirmed.

*377In Equity. On exceptions to master’s report.

A claim was tiled by E. L. Dehoney against the receivers of the Texas & Pacific Railway Company for damages caused by the burning of his meadow by fire ignited by a locomotive of the railway in passing. The claim was for $2 an acre damage to the meadow, and |40 for 4 acres of millet destroyed. The master allowed the claimant the $40 damage to the millet, but nothing for general damages. The claimant excepted to the master’s report.

*Foster & Wilson,*for claimant.

*W. W. Howe,*for receivers.

1

 Reported by Charles B. Stafford, Esq., of the New Orleans bar.

Pardee, J.,

*(orally.)*The evidence in this case is not sufficiently certain as to the extent of damage by fire to the meadow which was burned over. The meadow had been mown, and the grass was dried out by the weather. A fire was likely to do no injury except by kindling the rods of the grass. The evidence shows that after the fire the grass did not come up in spots. How extensive the spots were, and whether the failure in such spots was on account of the fire or the drouth, does not appear with any such certainty as to furnish the basis for the master or court to assess the damage. The complainant should have made his case and the extent of his damage reasonably certain by proof.

The exceptions will be overruled and the master’s report confirmed.
ORIGINAL
NAME                       ISSUE DATE                PRIN              DOC #
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
HITEL                      7/31/98                 $45,000            9812
Marsala*                   7/31/98                 $50,000            9813
Sterling/Anniston          7/31/98                 $45,000            9814
A.CRAWFORD                 7/31/98                 $35,000            9815
BOOT                       7/31/98                 $50,000            9816

* Filed herewith
<PAGE>



                       NEW YORK REGIONAL RAIL CORPORATION
                                 4302 FIRST AVE.
                               BROOKLYN, NY 11232
                        (718) 788-3690 FAX (718) 788-4462



                              PROMISSORY NOTE 9813
                                  July 31, 1998


FOR THE VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of John
Marsala, the sum of fifty thousand ($50,000.00) United States of America
Dollars.

The Note amount shall be paid to Note Holder in a single payment of fifty
thousand USA Dollars ($50,000.00), plus all accrued interest due, on or before
September 30, 1998. Interest will be Ten percent (10%) per annum.

The maker grants the Holder an OPTION to acquire 56,250 non restricted Common
Stock for:

         (i)       twenty cents ($.20) or
         (ii)     a value per share calculated by the ninety percent (90%) of
                  the average closing price of the common shares for the
                  previous five trading days prior to the date the conversion is
                  exercised by the Note holder.

Said OPTION will be exercisable until January 31, 1999. Maker warrants that
Common shares provided to Note Holder on exercise will be issued without
restrictions.

To receive a certificate for the Common shares when the Option is exercised, the
Note will be presented to the Corporation, with the accompanying form of
subscription duly executed. A subscription form is provided as an attachment to
this Note.

In the event of default, the undersigned agrees to pay all reasonable attorney
fees and costs of collection.


New York Regional Rail Corporation

By:_________________________
President
@misc{1216556,
  author = {Christine Beyzaei and Katherine Johnson and Sissy Nikolaou and Siamak Sattar and Jazalyn Dukes and Yalda Saadat},
  title = {NIST Transportation Systems and Functional Recovery Workshop Report},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-09-27 04:09:00},
  publisher = {Special Publication (NIST SP), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=956263},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1295},
  language = {en},
}
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

Venable Industries 

Under Contract No. N68335-06-C-0311 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59668 

Mr. Donald Woodard 

President 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Joseph D. Keller, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Chantilly, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

For reasons indicated by both parties, the Board is unable to proceed with the 

disposition of the above appeal for an inordinate length of time due to factors not within 

the control of the Board. Accordingly, the above appeal is hereby dismissed without 

prejudice pursuant to Board Rule 18(b ). Unless either party or the Board acts to reinstate 

the appeal within three years from the date of this order, the dismissal shall be deemed 

with prejudice. 

Dated: 21 July 2015 

Administrative Ju g 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59668, Appeal of Venable Industries, 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Porter
Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) for the annual period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David B. Pierce, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                      |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                       |  |  |  | PORTER BANCORP, INC.
|                       |  |  | 
|Dated: August 11, 2008 |  |  |  | By:                  |  | /s/ David B. Pierce    
|                       |  |  |  |                      |  | David B. Pierce        
|                       |  |  |  |                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - April 2006 

Benefit payments April 2006 April 2005 

Regular Retirement 

and Survivor Benefits 

Total 

Retired employ

Spouses and d

Widow(er)s - ag

Other survivors 

ees 

ivorced spouses 

ed and disabled 

22,774,000 

93,543,000 

156,715,000 

$785,466,000 

512,433,000 

22,179,000 

90,967,000 

155,323,000 

$762,628,000 

494,158,000 

Average under 

Being paid Awarded in Social Security 

Monthly benefits end of month month April 2006 

Number Average1 Number Average1 Being Paid Awarded 

Total 588,900 ......... 2,300 ......... ......... .........

Regular employee annuities, total 280,700 $1,810 900 $2,225 ......... .........

 Age 196,700 1,770 2 300 2 2,867 $1,006 3 $1,321

 Disability, Full Retirement Age and Over 34,500 1,616 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Disability, Under Full Retirement Age 49,500 2,108 300 2,290 943 993 

Spouses and divorced spouses 139,400 665 600 751 485 358 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 141,600 1,103 700 1,437 953 783 

Widowed mothers and fathers 900 1,402 4/ 1,638 719 711 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 14,600 737 100 749 5/ 5/ 

Children 11,700 827 4/ 1,108 660 662 

Other survivors 4/ 802 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Benefit payments 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

April 

2006 

$5,102,000 

April 

2005 

$5,235,000 

Number 

121,900 

Average 

$42 400 

Number 

$40 

Average 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement. 

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 34); about 300

 other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis. 

4

Fewer than 50. 

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers. 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. 

Regular retirement and survivor benefit payments total includes hospital insurance benefits for services in Canada. 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

April 2006 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Average payment 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period

 Per

 full week 

Unemployment 2,500 $477 $272 

Sickness 5,600 

April 2006 

483 

Benefit payments 

277 

April 2005 

Unemployment

Total 

2,883,000 

$5,437,000 $5,560,000

2,584,000 

Sickness 2,554,000 2,976,000 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited). Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.

 Recycled

 Paper 

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary
@misc{115541,
  author = {C Allocca},
  title = {Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory FY 2005 Programs and Accomplishments},
  year = {2005},
  month = {2005-12-01},
  publisher = {NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  language = {en},
}
#### Timothy A. Roulan, Appellant, v County of Onondaga et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 11, 2013;

decided February 14, 2013

Motion by New York Civil Liberties Union for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Three copies of the brief must be served and an original and nine copies filed within seven days.

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.