alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H79 -/S

ELECTRONIC RECORD

CCA # 09-14-00522-CR

STYLE: Ex Parte Rodarrion D. Armstrong

OFFENSE:

Appeal from

Bail

an Order Denying

PUNISHMENT:

COUNTY: Jasper

MOTION

FOR REHEARING IS:

DATE:

JUDGE:

TRIAL COURT: 1A District Court

TRIAL COURT #: 12170JD

TRIAL COURTJUDGE: Judge Jerome Owens

DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED

DATE: 04-01-15

JUSTICE:

PUBLISH:

LeanneJohnson PC NO S YES

NO

CLK RECORD:

RPT RECORD:

STATE BR:

APP BR:

12-09-14

12-29-14

02-19-15

01-20-15

DNP: YES

SUPPCLKRECORD:

SUPPRPTRECORD:

SUPP BR:

PROSE BR:

Y7<wr

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

ELECTRONIC RECORD

ANELLAHT'>S Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

K^>v^

DATE

JUDGE

CCA IS:.

JUDGE:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN

ON

:ca# PD-0479-15

Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS:

ON

JUDGE:
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 2,

2016

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 16

- 00287

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K .J.E.B.B., A CHILD , Appellant

Harris County, Texas 315th District Court Trial Court Cause No. 2014

- 04874J

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 24, 201 6. On May 20, 2016, appellant, Alvin Jermine Byrd, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jamison.
EXPARTE

DAVID CLIFFORD PEDDER, Jr.

WR-82,450-01

1$^ WR-82,450-01

1 2 I') T~C0URJ 0F CRIMINAL APPEALS

/'c^1 ' AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 7/20/2015 3:49:37 PM

Accepted 7/20/2015 3:51:18 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK

IN THE COURT -REGEIV|ED

OF

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

7/21/2015

-ABEL-AGQST-A, CLERK

CRIMINAL APPEALS

MOTION TO WITHHOLD RULING

Petitioner, David Pedder, hereby files this Motion to Withhold Ruling on the Writ of

Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner and would show unto the Court as follows:

On July 10, 2015, the 128th District Court signed its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of

Law on this matter. Evidently, that document and the others from this action were transmitted to

the Court ofCriminal Appeals on July 13, 2015. On July 14, 2014, the District Clerk mailed a one

page letter to Petitioner's Counsel indicating that the Clerk was "forwarding [Petitioner's]

Supplemental Writ of Habeas Corpus to the Court of Criminal Appeals." (See attached). The letter

did not mention the Court's Findings nor did it attach them. The letter arrived to Petitioner's

Counsel's office after hours on Friday, July 17, 2015 and was first reviewed by Counsel Monday,

July 20, 2015.

Counsel inquired of the District Clerk when the Court was slated to issue its findings and

only then received them by email (see attached). The Clerk is required, under Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure 73.4 to immediately send all parties notice and a copy of the Court's findings,

but the Orange County District Clerk failed to do so in this case. As a result, Petitioner just became

aware of the Findings and asks that the Court of Criminal Appeals withhold any ruling on this

matter for ten days from now, July 30, 2015, so that Counsel may file objections in accordance

with the time line afforded under Rule 73.4. This request is not made for the purposes of delay

but rather that Counsel have adequate time under the Rules to lodge his objections.

ELECTRONIC

RECORD
By:.

Respectfully submitted,

The Gertz Law Firm

2630 Liberty

Beaumont, Texas 77702

Tel: 409-833-6400

Fax:409-833-6401

Isi Ryan W. Gertz

Ryan W. Gertz

State Bar No. 24048489

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the attached and foregoing document has

been served on the Orange County District Clerk's Office, by faxing a copy to 409-882-7083 on

this the 20th day of July, 2015.

Isi Ryan W. Gertz

Ryan W. Gertz
Exhibit 10.47
 
  
   Compensation:
  Equity Compensation:
  Employment Agreement:




---



##### 



Benefits:
     This offer of employment is made contingent upon successful completion of the following:
 1.
    
    Your ability to provide proof of your identity and legal rights to work in the United States,
as specified by the Immigration and Reform Control Act of 1986. The attached list of documents outlines the
proof we can accept as dictated by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Please bring the required
forms with you to orientation.
 2.
    
    Successful completion of the background checks.




---



##### 



/s/
Roy Lever
    
    12/13/07Roy Lever
    
    Date




---



##### 



COMPENSATION OFFER  ROY LEVER
 Current
    
    Sovereign
    
    
    
    % Incr.Grade:
    
    
    
    ?
    
    21Base Salary:
    
    
    
    $225.0
    
    $350.0
    
    
    
    55.6%Bonus Target %:
    
    
    
    100%
    
    68%Bonus Target $s:
    
    
    
    $225.0
    
    $238.0
    
    
    
    5.8%Total Cash Comp:
    
    
    
    $450.0
    
    $588.0
    
    
    
    30.7%Annual Equity Grant Range:
    
    *
    
    $50.4
    
    $500Total Comp Range:
    
    
    
    $500.4
    
    $1,088Sign-on Bonus:
    
    
    
    
    
    $300.0
    
    #Deferred Comp:
    
    
    
    Up to 100% Bonus and a % of Salary
    
    Up to 100% BonusEmployment Agreement:
    
    
    
    
    
    2 years
    
    
    
    Renewed annually
 
 *
    
    Projected Range; not yet BOD approved#
    
    Roy indicates 2008 bonus determined at $240K to be paid in February 08. In conjunction
with $50K in restricted stock to vest in February 08 as well, recommend a $300K sign-on
bonus, to be paid $200K with Sovereigns bonuses and $100K on October 1, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6685]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “New Amsterdam: The Island at the Center of the World,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the South Street Seaport Museum, New York, NY, from on or about September 13, 2009, until on or about January 7, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (                        *telephone:*                         202/453-8048). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.                    

June 22, 2009.

C. Miller Crouch,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-15556 Filed 6-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
**FINA L REPORT** **1 REVISION TO THE**  **COMMENT TO**  **RULE OF EVIDENCE 409**  On July 30, 2015, effective October 1, 2015, upon recommendation of the Committee on Rules of Evidence, the Court ordered revision of the Comment to Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 409 to insert a reference to the Benevolent Gesture Medical Professional Liability Act, Act of October 25, 2013, P.L. 665, 35 P.S. §§ 10228.1
-.3

. The Committee believes that a signal to the existence of this legislation within the Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence would be beneficial to the bench and bar.

1 The Committee’s Final Report should not be confused with the official Committee Comments to the rules. Also note that the Supreme Court does not adopt the Committee’s Comments or the contents of the Committee’s explanatory Final Reports.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 20443 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Kenneth Charles Fragoso,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:90

- CR

- 328

- 2

Before **Jones, Barksdale,** and **Stewart,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

Kenneth Charles Fragoso challenge s denial of : his motion for compassionate release in the light of the COVID

- 19 pandemic ; and , the denial of his motion for reconsideration

. Fragoso, however, was granted clemency by the President of the United State s and has been released from

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 11, 2021 Lyle W. C ayce Clerk Case: 20-20443 Document: 00515777071 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2021No. 20

- 20443

2 prison . Accordingly, this appeal is moot. See Bailey v. Southerland , 821 F.2d 277, 278

– 79 (5th Cir. 1987)

. **DISMISSED**

**.** Case: 20-20443 Document: 00515777071 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/11/2021
#### Kenneth Passante, Appellant, v Peck & Sander Properties, LLC, et al., Respondents.

[823 NYS2d 220]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated March 4, 2005, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied his cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Labor Law protects employees, defined as workers for hire *(see*Labor Law § 2 [5]). To be covered under the provisions of the Labor Law, a plaintiff must “demonstrate that he [or she] was both permitted or suffered to work on a building or structure and that he was hired by someone, be it owner, contractor or their agent” *(Whelen v Warwick Val. Civic & Social Club,*47 NY2d 970, 971 [1979]). There must be a connection between the defendant and the worker, “whether by a lease agreement or grant of an easement, or other property interest” *(Abbatiello v Lancaster Studio Assoc.,*3 NY3d 46, 51 [2004]).

The Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment dismissing the causes of action to recover damages based on violations of Labor Law §§ 200, 240 (1), and § 241 (6) as the plaintiff was not employed at the site within the meaning of the Labor Law *(see Mordkofsky v V.C.V. Dev. Corp.,*76 NY2d 573, 576-577 [1990]; *Personius v Mann,*20 AD3d 616 [2005], *mod on other grounds 5*NY3d 857 [2005]; *Harrison v City of New York,*248 AD2d 592, 593 [1998]). The Supreme Court also properly granted summary judgment dismissing the cause of action based on common-law negligence because, after the defendants made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to summary judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact regarding the defendants’ actual or constructive notice of any defective condition *(see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,*67 NY2d 836, 838 [1986]). Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000391 04-JUN-2015 12:01 PM
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


To the Board of Directors
Northeast Bancorp


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-32095), (No. 33-58538), (No.  33-
32096) and (No. 33-87976) of Northeast Bancorp of our report dated
August 4, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Northeast Bancorp and Subsidiaries included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2000.



Portland, Maine                         Baker Newman & Noyes
September 25, 2000                      Limited Liability Company
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory F. Szabo, Treasurer of Exten Industries, Inc.  certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Exten Industries, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual report;

3.  Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

     a)  Designed such disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such  disclosure   controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material  information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during  the  period  in  which  this  annual  report  is being prepared; 

     b)  Evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  Registrant's  disclosure controls  and  procedures  and  presented  in this  report  our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and  procedures,  as of the end of the period  covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)  Disclosed in this annual report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the  Registrant's  fourth fiscal  quarter that has  materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially  affect,  the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent functions):

     a)  All significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses in the design  or  operation  of  internal   control  over  financial reporting which are reasonably  likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

     b)  Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or  other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  February 6, 2004
By:  /s/ Gregory F. Szabo
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. ONEIDA MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM H. MERRITT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Argued November 16, 1953

Decided November 23, 1953.

Before Judges Eastwood, Jayne and Fsancis.

*Mr. Frank J. Gimino,*Assistant County Prosecutor, argued the cause for the complainant-respondent *(Mr. Frederick T.*Law, County Prosecutor, attorney).

*Mr. Reuben P. Goldstein*argued the cause for the defendants-appellants.

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Tenenbaum reported in 27 *N. J. Super. 125 (Cty. Ct.*1953).
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 537 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding United States 

policy recognizing the Assyrian Genocide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2019 

Mr. HARDER of California submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding United States policy recognizing the Assyrian Genocide. 

Whereas the Ottoman Empire committed the crime of genocide against the Assyrian people, killing at least 300,000 

innocent Assyrians during the time of the First World 

War; 

Whereas Raphael Lemkin, who coined the term ‘‘genocide’’ in 

1944, drew on the history of the Assyrian Genocide in his 

seminal work that guided the United Nations Convention 

on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide; 

Whereas the Elie Wiesel Genocide and Atrocities Prevention 

Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–441) establishes that 

atrocities prevention represents a United States national 

interest, and affirms that it is the policy of the United 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 537 IH 

States to pursue a United States Government-wide strategy to identify, prevent, and respond to the risk of atrocities by ‘‘strengthening diplomatic response and the effective use of foreign assistance to support appropriate transitional justice measures, including criminal accountability, for past atrocities’’; 

Whereas the resilience and endurance of the Assyrian people 

is still commendable and praiseworthy, despite being victims of an ethnocide that is being continued by the Islamic State; 

Whereas American families continue to feel the effects of the 

Assyrian Genocide, including families that have never 

been reunited since; 

Whereas recognition and commemoration of a genocide is 

critical to efforts to prevent both future genocides and 

further harm to the group upon which the genocide was 

committed; and 

Whereas the Assyrian Genocide remains unrecognized by 

many countries and organizations across the globe, including the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that it is the policy of the United States to— 

3 (1) commemorate the Assyrian Genocide 

4 through official recognition and remembrance; 

5 (2) reject efforts to enlist, engage, or otherwise 

6 associate the United States Government with denial 

7 of the Assyrian Genocide or any other genocide; 

8 (3) call upon the Republic of Turkey to offi9 cially recognize the Assyrian Genocide; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 537 IH 

1 (4) encourage education and public under2 standing of the facts of the Assyrian Genocide, in3 cluding the United States role in the humanitarian 

4 relief effort, and the relevance of the Assyrian Geno5 cide to modern-day crimes against humanity. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000824894
<NAME>                         GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II-A
                                
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                              816,601
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                     2,286,322
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  3,102,923
<PP&E>                           30,922,933
<DEPRECIATION>                   26,418,614
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    8,518,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               249,871
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                        8,111,362
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      8,518,283
<SALES>                           1,932,820
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  4,314,335
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     1,340,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   2,973,572
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               2,973,572
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                      2,973,572
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          5.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0
        
 

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements  No.
33-16059,  No.  33-12755,  No.  33-55614,  No.  33-80504,  No. 333-00327 and No.
333-44180 of Sharper  Image  Corporation  on Form S-8 of our reports dated April
12, 2004, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule,
appearing in this Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Sharper Image  Corporation  for
the year ended January 31, 2004.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
--------------------------
San Francisco, California
April 15, 2004