alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7506

IBRAHIM ABDULLAH JABBAR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

C. T. WOODY, Sheriff; CAPT. ROBINSON, Medical Dept. Sup.; 

DR. FURMAN, Head Doctor, RCJ; DEPUTY HARRIS, Mailroom; NURSE 

FORD, Medical Dept. RCJ; SGT. JONES, Grievance Coordinator; 

LT. COLONEL BURNETT, Jail Operations; MAJ. ROBINSON, Medical 

Dept. Supervisor; CAPT. MCREA, Jail Operations RCJ; CHAPLAIN 

PRUITT, Under Sheriff, RCJ,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior 

District Judge. (1:09-cv-00246-TSE-TCB)

Submitted: December 20, 2011 Decided: December 22, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ibrahim Abdullah Jabbar, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Douglas Lane, 

THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ibrahim Abdullah Jabbar appeals the district court’s 

orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.* 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Jabbar v. Woody, No. 1:09-cv-00246-TSE-TCB (E.D. Va.

filed Sept. 29, 2009 & entered Sept. 30, 2009; filed Sept. 9, 

2010 & entered Sept. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * Jabbar filed an untimely notice of appeal. This court 

subsequently remanded this case to the district court for a 

determination as to whether Jabbar was entitled to a reopening 

of the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). See Jabbar 

v. Woody, 432 F. App’x 224 (4th Cir. May 25, 2011) 

(unpublished). Because the district court found that Jabbar is 

entitled to the benefit of Rule 4(a)(6), we address the appeal 

on the merits.
[Cite as State v. McKay , 124 Ohio St.3d 442, 2010-Ohio-718.]

T HE S TATE OF O HIO , A PPELLEE , v . M C K AY , A PPELLANT . [Cite as State v. McKay , 124 Ohio St.3d 442, 2010-Ohio-718.] Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on the authority of State v. Singleton. (No. 2007-1023

— Submitted January 13, 2010

— Decided March 4, 2010.) A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Ashtabula County, No. 2006-A-0066, 2007-Ohio-1923.

__________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Singleton , 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958, to the extent that the court of appeals held th at R.C. 2929.191 could be applied in this

case
. R.C. 2929.191 may not be applied to a sentence entered prior to July 11, 2006. M OYER , C.J., and P FEIFER , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , and C UPP , JJ.,

concur. L UNDBERG S TRATTON and L ANZINGER , JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of L ANZINGER , J., in State v. Singleton

.

__________________ Thomas L. Sartini, Ashtabula Count y Prosecuting Attorney, and Shelley M. Pratt, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Ashtabula County Public Defender Office, Inc., and Marie Lane, for appellant.

______________________
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Atlantis Plastics, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 (Registration Nos.
33-25983, 33-41012, and 333-34197) of our reports dated February 11, 1998,
except for Note 6, as to which the date is February 20, 1998, on our audits of
the consolidated financial statements of Atlantis Plastics, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1997 which reports are included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

COOPERS & LYBRAND, L.L.P.

Atlanta, Georgia
March 27, 1998
cc: Courtney Langston Lowe 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) I947A
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 ASSIGNMENT 
 This Assignment (this “Assignment”)
is effective as of 6:20 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on April 1, 2013 (the “Effective Time”), by and between ANADARKO E&P ONSHORE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignor”), and ANADARKO USH2 LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (“Assignee”). 
 RECITALS 

 

	 	 A.
	 Assignor is a party to the AEP Indemnification Agreement (“Indemnification Agreement”) dated March 1, 2013, between Assignor and
Western Gas Holdings, LLC. 


  

	 	 B.
	 Assignor and Assignee are both indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (“Anadarko”).



  

	 	 C.
	 In connection with the internal restructuring of certain subsidiaries of Anadarko, Assignor wishes to assign, and Assignee wishes to accept,
Assignor’s rights and obligations under the Indemnification Agreement. 


 NOW THEREFORE,
in consideration of the terms and obligations set forth below, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Assignor and Assignee agree as of the Effective Time as follows: 

 

	 	 1.
	 Assignment. Assignor assigns, transfers, and conveys to Assignee all of its rights, duties and obligations under the Indemnification
Agreement (the “Assigned Rights and Obligations”). 


  

	 	 2.
	 Assumption. Assignee assumes all of the Assigned Rights and Obligations, and agrees to be bound by the same terms and conditions in the
Indemnification Agreement that apply to Assignor with respect to the Assigned Rights and Obligations. 


  

	 	 3.
	 Miscellaneous. This Assignment shall be effective as of the Effective Time and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties
hereto and their successors in interest and assigns. This Assignment may not be amended, supplemented, altered, or modified except by an instrument in writing signed by each of the parties hereto. This Assignment may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. A digital or facsimile counterpart of this Assignment shall be sufficient to bind a party hereto to the
same extent as an original. This Assignment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York without regard to the principles of conflicts of law (whether of the State of New York or otherwise) that would
result in the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction. 


 [Signature page follows] 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Assignment to be
effective as of the Effective Time. 
  

			
	 ASSIGNOR:

	
	 ANADARKO E&P ONSHORE LLC

		
	 By:
	 	         /s/ Robert K. Reeves

		 	Robert K. Reeves
		 	Senior Vice President
	
	 ASSIGNEE:

	
	 ANADARKO USH2 LLC

		
	 By:
	 	         /s/ Robert G. Gwin 

		 	Robert G. Gwin
		 	President


  

			
	 ACKNOWLEDGMENT:

	
	 WESTERN GAS HOLDINGS, LLC

		
	 By:
	 	         /s/ Donald R. Sinclair

		 	Donald R. Sinclair
		 	President and Chief Executive Officer

 SIGNATURE PAGE TO ASSIGNMENT
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 18

- 00137

- CR

Marc Alym Kennedy

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (0525899A)

June 14, 2018

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Wade Birdwell

_________________ Justice Wade Birdwell
#### ELKINS v. NOBEL et al.

No. 1049.

District Court, E. D. New York.

June 24, 1940.

Theodore I. Welenkin, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for plaintiff.

Harry Malter, of New York City, for defendants Nobel.

*358Samuel Rothenberg, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for defendant Food Dealers Industrial Bank.

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

The motion made by defendants Frances Nobel and Irving Nobel to dismiss the complaint is denied.

The motion made by the defendant Food Dealers Industrial Bank for summary judgment is also denied.

The motion made by the defendants Frances Nobel and Irving Nobel for a jury trial as to the second, third and fourth causes of action is granted.

The inclusion in the complaint of a fraudulent transfer cause of action does not deprive the defendants of their right to a trial by jury.as to the other causes of action. However, there need not be two trials. The defendants will not be prejudiced by one trial as the evidence relating to all the causes of action is practically the same. The Court can proceed to impanel a jury, take such evidence as is germane to the second, third and fourth causes of action, submit those causes of action to the jury, then decide the issue of fraudulent conveyance or, if necessary, take such additional testimony as may be necessary on that cause of action, in the absence of the jury.

The procedure indicated is not repugnant to Rules 38 and 39, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, and will expedite the disposition of the issues raised without prejudice to any of the parties to the action, and will obviate two trials.
**Exhibit 32**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the Quarterly Report of DCP Holding Company (the “Company’) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report’), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as anofficer of the Company, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company./s/ Anthony A. Cook
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 125 (Wednesday, July 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31450-31451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15573]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning

[[Page 31451]]

individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of 
which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Urology ARRA.
    Date: July 23, 2009.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Paul A. Rushing, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 747, 
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-8895, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#deacabadb6b7b0b9ae9ebba6aaacbff0b0b7babab5f0b0b7b6f0b9b1a8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="760403051e1f18110636130e02041758181f12121d58181f1e58111900">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical Research 
and Research Support Awards., National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 24 2009.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-15573 Filed 6-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
November 19, 2013 www.bls.gov

Data Users Advisory Committee (DUAC) Agenda

Kathy Frederickson-Mele • Mele.Kathy@bls.gov • http://www.bls.gov/bls/duac.htm • 202.691.6102

8:30 a.m. Registration 

9:00 a.m. Commissioner’s welcome and review of agency developments (Erica Groshen) 

9:30 a.m. The impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on BLS health benefits data (Bill Wiatrowski, Marie

 Mora) 

10:30 a.m. Break

10:45 a.m. Measures of health care costs using CPI and PPI data (Mike Horrigan) 

11:00 a.m. Users’ needs for BLS employment and price data to understand the impact of the ACA (Ray Stone) 

 

11:45 p.m. Error corrections – Before and after publication (Michael Levi, Maurine Haver) 

12:15 p.m. Lunch 

1:30 p.m. Model wages using NCS and OES data (Mike Lettau, Dee Zamora, Kathryn Kobe) 

2:30 p.m. Report from the Taxonomy and Lexicon team (Dan Gillman, Ken Simonson) 

3:30 p.m. Break

3:45 p.m. New PPI Aggregation Structure (information session) (Maureen Doherty and Jonathan Weinhagen) 

4:45 p.m. Meeting wrap-up
J. 

sole issue to be determined is the extent of discipline to be imposed. See 

SCR 111(7), (8). 

It is so ORDERED. 

cc: Jeffrey Posin, Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board 

David A. Clark, Bar Counsel 

Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada 

Olson, Cannon, Gormley, Angulo & Stoberski 

Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A e
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NGADIMIN MARTOREBO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-75108

Agency No. A095-618-243

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Ngadimin Martorebo, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal

and denying his motion to remand. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. 

FILED

OCT 25 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-75108

We review for substantial evidence factual findings, Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d

1012, 1015 (9th Cir. 2003), and for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to

remand, Romero-Ruiz v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny

the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of withholding of removal

because Martorebo failed to demonstrate it is more likely than not that he or his

children will be persecuted because his children are citizens of the United States. 

See Nagoulko, 333 F.3d at 1018 (fear of future harm is too speculative).

The agency was within its discretion in denying Martorebo’s motion to

remand because the BIA considered the evidence submitted and acted within its

broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant

remand. See Romero-Ruiz, 538 F.3d at 1062 (“The BIA abuses its discretion if its

decision is arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law.”) (internal citation and

quotations omitted).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rafael Hernandez, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 79]

*336Defendant received effective assistance of counsel under the state and federal standards *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *see also Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]). Defendant asserts that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to make specific challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence. While failing to make a “winning argument” can constitute ineffective assistance *(People v Turner,*5 NY3d 476, 481 [2005]), none of the arguments in question fall into that category. The evidence supported the conclusion that defendant had no privilege or license to enter either of the apartments at issue *(see e.g. People v Quinones,*173 AD2d 395 [1991], *Iv denied*78 NY2d 972 [1991]), and also supported the conclusion that he left his fingerprints in those apartments in the course of burglarizing them *(see e.g. People v Texeira,*32 AD3d 756 [2006], *Iv denied*7 NY3d 904 [2006]), and we find that arguments to the contrary would have been unavailing. Concur-Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman and Nardelli, JJ. *[See*7 Misc 3d 568.]
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Russell A. Olson, Chief Financial Officer of Intcomex, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 26, 2009



/s/ Russell A. OlsonRussell A. OlsonChief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Contact Us

> 
There are many ways to get in touch with us. Please see below for contact information for NINDS.

## General Inquiries

> 
For health information and publications related to neurological disorders and stroke, referrals to other agencies and organizations, and clinical trials information, please contact the NINDS Information Resource Center using the form and other information below.

> 
**Please note**: We cannot provide medical advice or referrals. If you need medical advice, or a second opinion, please consult your healthcare provider. A list of resources for locating physicians is available from MedlinePlus.

phone

**1-800-352-9424****7-1-1**

book

envelope-open-text

## Media Inquiries

For media inquiries, email the NINDS Press Team at NINDSPressTeam@ninds.nih.gov.

## Social Media

To stay up to date with NINDS programs, events, funding, and training opportunities, follow us on social media!

### X (formerly known as Twitter)

                    - Official NINDS X account
                    - NINDS Director Walter J. Koroshetz, M.D.
                    - Office of Programs to Enhance Workforce Diversity

                    - Office of Pain Policy and Planning
                    - Office of Research Quality

### Facebook 

                    - Official NINDS Facebook account 

### YouTube

                    - Official NINDS YouTube Channel 
                    - BRAIN Initiative® YouTube Channel 

### LinkedIn 

                    - Official NINDS LinkedIn account   

### Podcast 

                    - NINDS Building Up the Nerve

## NINDS Staff

To to reach a specific member of our staff, visit the our Staff Directory. If you are looking to discuss your research or are interested in a specific NINDS research area, visit the list of NINDS program directors and managers to connect with the right staff member.

## Locations and Directions

Planning to visit NINDS ? Find maps and other helpful travel related information on our Visitor Information page.
ACCEPTED 06-15-00108-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 7/20/2015 3:32:40 PM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Clifford A. Reid,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Complete Genomics, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Complete Genomics, Inc.



|    |  |                            |  |                        
|--- |  | -------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Clifford A. Reid Ph.D.
|    |  | Name:                      |  | Clifford A. Reid Ph.D. 
|    |  | Title:                     |  | Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 9, 2011

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), has been provided to Complete Genomics, Inc. and will be retained by Complete Genomics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Complete Genomics, Inc. under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.