alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906**

**of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 

In connection with thereport of Primoris Services Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter J. Moerbeek, ExecutiveVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

1.                                      The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                      The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

In witness whereof, theundersigned has executed and delivered this certificate as of the date setforth opposite his signature below.

 
| Date: August 11, 2009 | /s/ PETER J. MOERBEEK                                             |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Peter J. Moerbeek                                                 |
| * *                   | *Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  and Director* |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alfred Dancy, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 758]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), rendered December 5, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of seven years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]), including its rejection of defendant’s defense of temporary innocent possession.

Defendant’s other argument is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find no basis for reversal. Concur—Andrias, J.E, Nardelli, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
(More)

No. 20-8 For Immediate Release

May 2020

RRB Pays Extended Unemployment Benefits under CARES Act

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act, recently signed into 

law by President Trump, authorized extended unemployment insurance (UI) benefits for railroad 

workers sidelined during the COVID-19 pandemic. After making necessary programming changes 

to agency systems, the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) began processing and paying 

extended benefits on May 11.

The CARES Act authorized payment of extended UI benefits to rail workers who received UI

benefits from July 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020. Under the legislation, railroad workers with less than 

10 years of service may be eligible for up to 65 days of extended benefits within 7 consecutive 2-

week registration periods. Workers with 10 or more years of railroad service, who were 

previously eligible for up to 65 days in extended benefits, may now receive benefits for up to 130 

days within 13 consecutive 2-week registration periods. No extended benefit period under this 

provision can begin after December 31, 2020.

The RRB will identify any employees who exhausted their regular UI benefits during the 

benefit year that began July 1, 2019, and send them a letter and claim forms to receive the 

extended benefits. The agency will also load appropriate claim forms to online accounts so that 

individuals can file them online through myRRB on the agency website, RRB.gov.

Since RRB offices are currently closed to the public due to the pandemic, railroad employees 

are encouraged to file for UI benefits by setting up an online myRRB account if they have not 

already done so.

The extended benefits are being paid from a previous appropriation under the American 

Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, of which $140 million remains. As a result, these 

benefits will not be charged to rail employers in calculating their contribution rates to fund the 

railroad unemployment system. Extended benefits will be payable until a claimant’s eligibility is 

exhausted or the appropriation is depleted, whichever comes first.

While the extended benefits will not be subject to reduction due to budget sequestration, the 

RRB does remind recipients that the payments are subject to income taxation and garnishment for 

tax or other legally established debts.

U.S. Railroad Retirement Board

RRB News

844 North Rush Street Chicago, Illinois 60611-1275

www.rrb.gov

877-772-5772 general information

Public Affairs

312-751-4777 

opa@rrb.gov media inquiries
-2-

The team responsible for programming adjustments continues to work diligently to update 

systems to allow for the payment of the additional CARES Act benefits. When that processing is 

completed, payment will be made to cover retroactive periods. Meanwhile, employees who met 

eligibility requirements for UI at the beginning of the benefit year but had exhausted those 

benefits will now be able to file for and again receive UI benefits.

# # #
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Conrado Pons, Appellant, v William A. Lee, Respondent.

Submitted January 7, 2013;

decided March 21, 2013

Motion for reargument denied *[see*20 NY3d 905 (2012)].

Judge Rivera taking no part.
# table33_q4.6_size
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15206]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1196-000]


Lost Creek Wind, LLC; Notice of Filing

June 22, 2009.
    Take notice that, on June 16, 2009, Lost Creek Wind, LLC filed a 
supplement to its filing in the above captioned docket with information 
required under the Commission's regulations. Such filing served to 
reset the filing date in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link, and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a6c6f786965444643444f795f5a5a45585e6a4c4f5849044d455c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d5b584f5e5273717473784e686d6d726f695d7b786f7e337a726b">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on July 7, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-15206 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# table_q_state
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 696 

Establishing the Elijah E. Cummings Room. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2019 

Mr. MEADOWS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION 

Establishing the Elijah E. Cummings Room. 

Whereas Elijah Eugene Cummings was born on January 18, 

1951, in Baltimore to Ruth Elma and Robert Cummings; 

Whereas, as the son of sharecroppers, he grew up with an understanding of adversity and challenges and his parents 

inspired in him his sense of justice; 

Whereas he graduated with honors from the Baltimore City 

College high school in 1969, then attended Howard University in the District of Columbia, where he served in 

the student government as sophomore class president, 

student government treasurer, and later student government president, and graduated in 1973, with a bachelor’s 

degree in political science; 

Whereas he graduated from law school at the University of 

Maryland School of Law, receiving his juris doctor in 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 696 IH 

1976, and was admitted to the bar in Maryland later 

that year and practiced law for 19 years; 

Whereas he received 12 honorary doctoral degrees from universities across the United States, most recently an honorary doctorate of public service from the University of 

Maryland, College Park, in 2017; 

Whereas for 14 years, he served in the Maryland House of 

Delegates and served as Chairman of the Legislative 

Black Caucus of Maryland and was the first African 

American in Maryland history to be named Speaker pro 

Tempore, the second highest position in the House of 

Delegates; 

Whereas he was elected to the House of Representatives in 

1996, and served the people of Maryland’s 7th Congressional District; 

Whereas as Chairman of the Oversight and Reform Committee, he cared deeply about holding public officials accountable and making the government work better; 

Whereas he lived in the Madison Park community in Baltimore and was an active member of the New Psalmist 

Baptist Church for 40 years; 

Whereas he was a loving family man, husband, and father 

who leaves behind two daughters and a son, and his wife, 

Maya Rockeymoore Cummings; and 

Whereas he died on October 17, 2019, at Johns Hopkins 

Hospital at the age of 68 and laid in state at the United 

State Capitol Building’s Statuary Hall on October 24, 

becoming the first African-American lawmaker to achieve 

the honor of lying in state: Now, therefore, be it 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 696 IH 

1 Resolved, That in honor of the life and legacy of Eli2 jah E. Cummings, room 2154 of the Rayburn House Of3 fice Building is named the ‘‘Elijah E. Cummings Room’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ ANTHONY F. BOVAANTHONY F. BOVAPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-1995
<CASH>                                            3530
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2494
<ALLOWANCES>                                       204
<INVENTORY>                                      38928
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 50080
<PP&E>                                           56143
<DEPRECIATION>                                   15346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   92291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            33496
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           103
<OTHER-SE>                                       52237
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     92291
<SALES>                                         141287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                141287
<CGS>                                            84032
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    84032
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 14071
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1264)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (493)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (771)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (771)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.07)
        

<PAGE>

</TABLE>
BLS Technical Advisory Committee 

June 16, 2017 - Agenda 

 

8:30 Acting Commissioner’s Welcome and Review of Agency Developments

9:00 Disease Based Price Indexes

 Presenter: Ralph Bradley, BLS – Prices and Living Conditions 

 Discussants: Emi Nakamura, Columbia University 

 Marshall Reinsdorf, International Monetary Fund 

 

10:30 Break 

10:45 The Impact of Alternative Output Concepts on Productivity Growth 

 Presenter: Lucy Eldridge, BLS – Productivity and Technology 

Discussants: Carol Corrado, The Conference Board 

Bart Hobijn, Arizona State University 

12:15 Lunch 

1:30 Discussion of Future Priorities

2:00 Incorporating OSHA-collected data with the Survey of Occupational Illness and Injury

 Presenter: Brooks Pierce – Compensation and Working Conditions 

2:45 Break 

3:00 Incorporating OSHA-collected data with the Survey of Occupational Illness and Injury, 

continued

 Discussants: Brady West, University of Michigan 

 Steven Heeringa, University of Michigan 

 

4:00 Conclusion 

Janet Norwood Conference Center · 2 Massachusetts Avenue Northeast · Washington, D.C. 20212
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 17, 2019.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D19-117

Lower Tribunal No. 19-262

________________

Milagros Rodriguez,

Appellant,

vs.

Griselda Stanfield,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michaelle

Gonzalez-Paulson, Judge.

Milagros Rodriguez, in proper person.

Walter J. Harvey, School Board Attorney, and Jeff James, Assistant School

Board Attorney, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and LOGUE and HENDON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.
Upon our review of the record and the initial brief, we affirm on the

authority of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) (providing: “After

service of the initial brief . . . , the court may summarily affirm the order to be

reviewed if the court finds that no preliminary basis for reversal has been

demonstrated.”)

2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Susser Holdings Corporation (the Company) for the three months ended July 1,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sam L. Susser, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                             |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 15 , 2007 |  |  |  | SUSSER HOLDINGS CORPORATION
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | By                          |  | /s/ Sam L. Susser                    
|                       |  |  |  |                             |  | Sam L. Susser                        
|                       |  |  |  |                             |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate D istrict of Texas at Fort Worth

______________ ____ _________ No. 02

- 22

- 00458

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 233rd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 233

- 719643

- 22
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwe ll, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Sudd erth 

### V ECENTIE 

### S ONTIAGO 

### M ORALES 

### , Appellant

V


### . A NN 

### D ELYNN 

### W OOD 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pro se Appellant Vec enti e Sontiago Morales has filed a notice of appea l , though what he is appealing is unclear

. Appellant ’ s notice of appeal references three pending motions

— a motio n to dismiss, a motion for a counterclaim, and a motion to

r em o ve the case to federal court

— but none of th o se motion s have been ruled upon by the trial court

. Generally, a ppeals may b e ta ken only from final judgments or appealable interlocutory orders , an d abse nt such a judgment or o rder, we lack jurisdicti on t o consider the appeal

. Sabre Travel Int ’ l, Ltd. v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG , 567 S.W.3d 725, 730, 736 (Tex. 2019) ; Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp ., 39 S.W.3 d 191, 19 5 (Tex. 2001) ; Johnson v. ONM Living LLC , N o. 02

- 22

- 00439

- CV, 2022 WL 17842142, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth Dec. 22, 2022, no pet. h.) (per curiam) (mem . op.)

. Because the
trial court has not ruled on Appellant ’ s motions , there is no judgment or order

— much le ss a final judgment or an appealable or der

— for him to appeal

. Accor dingly, w e notified Appellant of our co ncer n that we lacked jurisdiction over this appeal , and w e warned that w e would dismiss the appeal unl ess , within 20 days, he (or any other party) furnished us with a signed copy of the ord er that Appellant seeks to a ppeal

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a ) , 43.2(f), 44.3

. Mor e than 20 days have passed , and we have no t received a response.3 Therefore, we dismiss th is appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 4 3.2 ( f )

. /s/ Bonnie Sudderth
Bonnie Sudd erth Chief Justice

Deli ve red: J anu ary 12, 2023
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15419]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8924-5]


Proposed CERCLA Section 122(g) Administrative Agreement for De 
Minimis Settlement for the Consolidated Iron and Metal Co. Superfund 
Site, City of Newburgh, Orange County, NY

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 122(i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as 
amended (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given by the 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA''), Region 2, of a proposed 
de minimis administrative agreement pursuant to section 122(g) of 
CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9622(g), between EPA and the Town of Rhinebeck (``the 
Town''), Dutchess County, New York, pertaining to the Consolidated Iron 
and Metal Co. Superfund Site (``Site'') located in the City of 
Newburgh, Orange County, New York. Under the settlement, the Town will 
pay $49,907.23 to the EPA Hazardous Substance Superfund Consolidated 
Iron and Metal Co. Site Special Account, which is considered to be its 
fair share of past and future cleanup costs, plus a ``premium'' for 
uncertainties associated with the Site. The settlement includes a 
covenant not to sue pursuant to sections 106 and 107 of CERCLA, 42 
U.S.C. 9606 and 9607, relating to the Site, and protection from 
contribution actions or claims as provided by sections 113(f)(2) and 
122(g)(5) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9613(f)(2) and 9622(g)(5). EPA will 
receive written comments relating to the settlement for thirty (30) 
days following publication of this notice. EPA will consider all 
comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the 
settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations that 
indicate that the proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper, or 
inadequate. EPA's response to any comments received will be available 
for public inspection at EPA Region 2, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 
10007-1866.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before July 30, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement is available for public inspection 
at EPA Region 2 offices at 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007-1866. 
Comments should reference the Consolidated Iron and Metal Co. Superfund 
Site, Index No. CERCLA-02-2009-2001. To request a copy of the proposed 
settlement agreement, please contact the individual identified below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carol Y. Berns, Assistant Regional 
Counsel, New York/Caribbean Superfund Branch, Office of Regional 
Counsel, EPA Region 2, 17th Floor, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 
10007-1866. Telephone: 212-637-3177.

    Dated: June 17, 2009.
Walter Mugdan,
Director, Emergency and Remedial Response Division, Region 2.
[FR Doc. E9-15419 Filed 6-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-60-P
#### SSM Consulting LLC, Appellant, v CTI Teksource LLC, et al., Respondents. CTI Teksource LLC et al., Respondents, v CTI Teksource I, Inc., Also Known as CTI Teksource, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[975 NYS2d 872]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard J. Fried, J.), entered June 1, 2012, to the extent that it denied the motion for summary judgment of defendants CTI Teksource I, Inc., Steven Tucker and SSM Consulting, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court properly found the exception to the non-compete clauses ambiguous *(see Greenfield v Philles Records,*98 *438NY2d 562, 569-570 [2002]). Given the ambiguity, there are issues of fact as to the specific conduct defendant Tucker was prohibited from engaging in and whether his conduct was impermissibly competitive or de minimis. Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Renwick, Feinman and Clark, JJ.