29716 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 23, 2009 / Notices 

the Refuges for the next 15 years. 

Alternative A was the no-action 

alternative, which described current 

Refuge management activities. 

Alternative B placed greater emphasis 

on biological resources than on visitor 

services. Alternative C (the selected 

alternative) provided an optimal balance 

of improved biological resource 

objectives and expanded visitor services 

opportunities. Alternative D placed 

greater emphasis on visitor services than 

on biological resources. 

The Service received 75 comment 

letters on the Draft CCP and EA during 

the review period. The comments 

received were incorporated into the CCP 

when possible, and we responded to the 

comments in an appendix to the CCP. In 

the FONSI, Alternative C was selected 

for implementation and is the basis for 

the CCP. The FONSI documents the 

decision of the Service and is based on 

the information and analysis contained 

in the EA. 

Under the selected alternative, the 

Refuges would achieve an optimal 

balance of biological resource objectives 

and visitor services opportunities. 

Habitat management and associated 

biological resource monitoring would be 

improved. Visitor service opportunities 

would focus on quality wildlifedependant recreation distributed 

throughout the Refuges. In addition, 

environmental education, 

interpretation, wildlife observation, 

photography, and hunting programs 

would be improved and/or expanded. 

The selected alternative best meets 

the Refuges’ purposes, vision and goals; 

contributes to the Refuge System 

mission; addresses the significant issues 

and relevant mandates; and is consistent 

with principles of sound fish and 

wildlife management. 

Public Availability of Documents 

In addition to the methods in 

ADDRESSES, you can view or obtain 

documents at the following locations: 

• Our Web site: http:// 

sacramentovalleyrefuges.fws.gov. 

• Public Libraries: during regular 

library hours, at the following libraries: 

Library Address Phone 

number 

Bayliss Library ............................................................ 7830 County Road 39, Glenn, CA 95943 ............................................ 530–934–2287 

Butte County Library .................................................. 1108 Sherman Avenue, Chico, CA 95926 ........................................... 530–891–2762 

Butte County Public Library ....................................... 1820 Mitchell Avenue, Oroville, CA 5966 ............................................ 530–538–7641 

Colusa County Library ............................................... 738 Market Street, Colusa, CA 95932 ................................................. 530–458–7671 

Colusa County Library ............................................... 232 Prince Street, Princeton, CA 95970 .............................................. 530–439–2235 

Corning Library ........................................................... 740 3rd Street, Corning, CA 96021 ...................................................... 530–824–7050 

Orland City Library ..................................................... 333 Mill Street, Orland, CA 95963 ....................................................... 530–865–1640 

Sutter County Library ................................................. 750 Forbes Avenue, Yuba City, CA 95991 .......................................... 530–822–7137 

Willows Public Library ................................................ 201 North Lassen Street, Willows, CA 95988 ...................................... 530–934–5156 

Dated: June 17, 2009. 

Margaret T. Kolar, 

Acting Regional Director, Pacific Southwest 

Region, Sacramento, California. 

[FR Doc. E9–14662 Filed 6–22–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–55–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–663] 

In the Matter of Certain Mobile 

Telephones and Wireless 

Communication Devices Featuring 

Digital Cameras, and Components 

Thereof; Notice of Commission 

Decision Not To Review an Initial 

Determination Amending the 

Complaint and Notice of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 14) issued by the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) in the 

above-captioned investigation granting 

leave to complainant Eastman Kodak 

Co. (‘‘Kodak’’) to amend its complaint 

and the notice of investigation to assert 

an additional patent claim in the 

investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

M. Bartkowski, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–5432. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

investigation was instituted on 

December 18, 2008, based on a 

complaint filed by complainant Kodak 

of Rochester, New York. The complaint 

alleged violations of section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in 

the importation into the United States, 

the sale for importation, and the sale 

within the United States after 

importation of certain mobile 

telephones and wireless communication 

devices that infringe certain claims of 

U.S. Patent Nos. 5,493,335 (‘‘the ’335 

patent’’) and 6,292,218. The complaint 

named Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; 

Samsung Telecommunications America, 

LLC; LG Electronics, Inc.; LG 

Electronics USA; and LG Electronics 

MobileComm USA, Inc. 

On May 26, 2009, the ALJ issued the 

subject ID, granting Kodak’s motion for 

leave to amend the complaint and the 

notice of investigation to assert claim 12 

of the ’335 patent. No petitions for 

review were filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

sections 210.42 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: June 17, 2009. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–14665 Filed 6–22–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P