alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 13, 2018

No. 04-17-00118-CR

Roxanne Y. CHAVEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR0769

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

The court has considered Appellant’s motion for rehearing and motion for en banc 

reconsideration. The motions are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.5, 49.7.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of August, 2018.
___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# Result 21.5
#### Samar Shah et al., Appellants, v Juan Ortiz et al., Respondents.

[976 NYS2d 878]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered July 23, 2013, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to disqualify Jeffrey P Shapiro, Esq. from serving as defendants’ co-counsel, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ motion to disqualify defendants’ co-counsel. Plaintiffs failed to meet their burden of showing that they had a prior attorney-client relationship with Mr. Shapiro which is fatal to a motion to disqualify under Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0) rule 1.7 (b) (see *Solow v Grace & Co.,*83 NY2d 303, 308 [1994]; *Campbell v McKeon,*75 AD3d 479 [1st Dept 2010]). Contrary to plaintiffs argument, defendants’ counsel did not previously represent the plaintiffs in this action, rather, he represented defendant A-Data Technology of Latin America.

We also find that counsel’s testimony in this action is unessential and would be cumulative. Accordingly, disqualification is not warranted under the advocate-witness rule (Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 3.7; *see Campbell,*75 AD3d at 481).

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Freedman and Clark, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2013 NY Slip Op 31649(U).]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the amended quarterly report of Pet Express Supply, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Renea Yamada, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Diane Egger, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Renea Yamada

Renea Yamada

Chief Executive Officer

June
15, 2007





/s/ Diane Egger

Diane Egger

Chief Financial Officer

June
15, 2007
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. (“BGH”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Forrest E. Wylie, Chief Executive Officer ofMainLine Management LLC, the general partner of BGH, hereby certify, to myknowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of BGH.

 

 
|                         | MAINLINE  MANAGEMENT LLC, as general partner of BGH |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                                |
| Date:  November 4, 2008 | /s/ FORREST E.  WYLIE                               |
|                         | Forrest E. Wylie                                    |
|                         | *Chief  Executive Officer*                          |

 

----
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul Mann, Principal Accounting Officer of Quartz Mountain
Resources Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended July 31, 2008 (the Annual Report) fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                             

|Date:  | October 10, 2008             | 
|------ | ---------------------------- | 
|       |                              | 
|       |                              | 
|       | /s/ Paul Mann                | 
|By:    | Paul Mann                    | 
|Title: | Principal Accounting Officer | 

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
40-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of The Black & Decker Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nolan D. Archibald, Chief
Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ NOLAN D. ARCHIBALD
Nolan D. Archibald
Chief Executive Officer
February 14, 2006
@conference{1216101,
  author = {Milos Drobnjakovic and Guodong Shao and Ana Nikolov and Boonserm Kulvatunyou and Simon P. Frechette and Vijay Srinivasan},
  title = {Towards Ontologizing a Digital Twin Framework for Manufacturing},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-09-21 04:09:00},
  publisher = {Proceedings of the APMS 2023 IFIP International Conference; Advances in Production Management Systems
"Production Management Systems for Responsible Manufacturing, Service and Logistics Futures", Trondheim, NO},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936637},
  language = {en},
}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

STB INVESTMENTS CORP., RICHARD 

BASCIANO, THOMAS SIMMONDS, 

FRANK CRESCI, ALEX WOLFINGTON, 

WOLFINGTON NETWORK, LLC, THE 

SALVATION ARMY, CHARLES 

DEITRICK, JOHN CRANFORD, 

ALISTAIR FRASER, PLATO 

MARINAKOS, JR., PLATO MARINAKOS 

ARCHITECT, LLC, JACK HIGGINS AND 

JACK F. HIGGINS ARCHITECT, INC., 

 Petitioners 

 v. 

ANGELO HARMON, INDIVIDUALLY AND 

AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE 

OF JUANITA HARMON, NADINE WHITE, 

LINDA BELL, BERNARD DITOMO, 

JENNIFER REYNOLDS, FELICIA HILL, 

ROSEMARY KREUTZBERG, RODNEY 

GEDDIS, SHIRLEY BALL AND STANLEY 

BALL, H/W, BETTY BROWN; MAGGIE 

ADAMS DAVIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF 

BORBOR DAVIS, MARIYA PLEKAN, 

GEORGE SIMPSON, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE 

ESTATE OF MARY SIMPSON, AIAH 

GBESSAY , AIAH BOYA AND FRANCIS 

SANKOH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS COADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF 

ROSELINE CONTEH, DECEASED, 

NANCY WINKLER AND JOHN BRYAN, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF 

ANNE BRYAN, MARGARITA AGOSTO, 

JONATHAN M. FINNEGAN, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 48 EM 2015 
48 EM 2015 - 2 

KIMBERLY FINNEGAN, BONNIE B. 

JOHNSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF 

DANNY C. JOHNSON, 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2015, the Application for Extraordinary Relief 

Pursuant to the Court’s King’s Bench Power and/or Plenary Jurisdiction is DENIED.
Exhibit 11.  Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings
     
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             Year Ended          Year Ended
                                            June 30, 1998       June 30, 1997
                                          -----------------   -----------------
<S>                                       <C>                 <C>              
EQUIVALENT SHARES:                                                         
                                                                   
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding            2,277,165           2,152,564   
                                                                          
Total Diluted Shares                           2,795,243           2,668,210
                                                                  
Net Income                                $    2,403,783      $    1,489,745
Less Preferred Stock Dividend                    125,827             139,999
                                          -----------------   -----------------
Income Available to Common Stockholders   $    2,277,956      $    1,349,746    
                                          =================   =================

Basic Earnings Per Share                  $            1.00   $            0.63
Diluted Earnings Per Share                $            0.86   $            0.56

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 10.5
                                 ------------

     Reference is made to that certain lease dated September 12, 1988 made by
and between LYNN SHADOWS, a California General Partnership, as Landlord, and
SEMTECH CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, as Tenant, covering property
situated in Newbury Park, County of Ventura, State of California described in
Exhibit A of above referenced lease.  Effective January 1, 1996, all right,
title and interest in and to said Lease was assigned by LYNN SHADOWS, a
California General Partnership, unto LYNN SHADOWS, L.L.C., a California Limited
Liability Company in accordance with an Assignment of Lease, dated as of January
1, 1996.  All references to Landlord in this Extension of Lease shall mean LYNN
SHADOWS, L.L.C.

     NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties hereto that the above
referenced lease and additions thereto be extended in accordance with the
following terms and conditions:

     1.   The lease term is to be extended for a period of five (5) years from
September 1, 1998 and to terminate on August 31, 2003.

     2.   The minimum monthly rental commencing September 1, 1998 and for the
balance of the extended lease term, shall be Eighteen Thousand Seven Hundred and
Fifty Six Dollars and no/100ths ($18,756.00).

     3.   Tenant shall have the right to cancel this lease at any time during
the extension period after August 31, 2001 as long as written notice is provided
to Landlord at least twelve (12) months prior to the termination date selected
by Tenant.

     4.   Paragraph 44 of the Lease dated September 13, 1988 is herewith
deleted.

     5.   Other than as herein specifically amended, all other terms and
conditions of that certain lease dated September 12, 1988 shall remain in full
force and effect during the term of this extension herein provided.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto set their hands this September 9th
day of September 1997.

LANDLORD            LYNN SHADOWS, a California Limited Liability Company

                         By: __________________________________________

                         By: __________________________________________

                         By: __________________________________________

                         By: __________________________________________

TENANT              SEMTECH CORPORATION

                         By: __________________________________________

                         By: __________________________________________

                                     -33-
## State of N ew York Su p reme C ou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: August 6, 2015 519550

________________________________ In the Matter of CURTIS OWENS, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: June 8, 2015 Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ.

__________ Curtis Owens, Comstock, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Determination confirmed. No opinion. Lahtinen, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ., concur.-2- 519550

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
July 16, 2015

Twelfth Court of Appeals

1517 W Front St Ste 354

Tyler TX 75702-7854

Re: Athelston Hayles

 12-14-00172-CR

To The Honorable Clerk of the Court:

Please find enclosed a copy of the letter sent to my client regarding his right to file a PDR along 

with a copy of the certified return receipt showing the mailing of the same. 

Sincerely,

/s/Austin Reeve Jackson

ACCEPTED

12-14-00172-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

7/16/2015 10:38:24 AM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 7/16/2015 10:38:24 AM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk

July 09, 2015

Brandon Gober

Inmate 01942989

Hodge Unit

PO Box 999

Rusk, TX 75785

Re: Opinion

 

Mr. Gober: 

Please find enclosed a copy of opinion issued by the Court of Appeals in your case. The Court 

has affirmed your conviction.

Should you desire to do so, you do have the right to file a pro se Petition for Discretionary 

Review in the Court of Criminal Appeals. If you decide to pursue that option you must file your 

petition prior to the expiration of thirty days from the date of the court’s opinion.

I would be happy to address any questions or concerns you have if you will simply let me know. 

Sincerely,

Austin Reeve Jackson
Affirmed as Reformed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 23, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00633-CR

CURTIS JAMES SIMOND, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 337th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1405231

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant appeals his conviction for aggravated assault of a family member. 

Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is 

wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the 

record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See 

High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). A copy of 
2

counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to 

examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 

S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than 60 days have 

passed and no pro se response has been filed.

The judgment does contain a clerical error. The record reflects appellant 

entered a plea of “true” to the enhancement paragraph but the judgment incorrectly 

states the plea was “N/A.” Accordingly, we reform the trial court’s judgment to 

reflect appellant pled “true” to the first enhancement paragraph. See French v. 

State, 830 S.W.2d 607, 609 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992) (stating appellate court has 

authority to reform a judgment to “speak the truth”). In an appeal in which counsel 

has filed an Anders brief, we are not required to abate the appeal for appointment 

of new counsel if the judgment may be reformed. See Ferguson v. State, 435 

S.W.3d 291, 295 (Tex. App.—Waco 2014, no pet.) (reforming judgment in Anders

appeal to correct age of child complainant); Bray v. State, 179 S.W.3d 725, 730 

(Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, no pet.) (reforming judgment in Anders appeal to 

delete improper condition of parole); see also Getts v. State, 155 S.W.3d 153, 155 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (affirming court of appeals’ judgment reforming the 

judgment of conviction in Anders appeal).

Having reformed the judgment, as noted above, and having carefully 

reviewed the record and counsel’s brief, we agree the appeal is wholly frivolous 

and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. We are not to 

address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response 

when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. 

State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment as reformed.
3

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby. 

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
@article{1213911,
  author = {Phillip Pickett and Yuanchi Ma and Vivek Prabhu},
  title = {Polyzwitterion fast and slow mode behavior are coupled to phase separation as observed by dynamic laser light scattering},
  year = {2023},
  number = {159},
  month = {2023-09-11 04:09:00},
  publisher = {The Journal of Chemical Physics},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936901},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0162376},
  language = {en},
}
# Field Descriptions

# 2017 Nonprofit Data
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Aaron Lamkin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of TapSlide, Inc. on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended April 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of TapSlide, Inc.

|                       |     |                                      
|---------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------
|Date:    June 19, 2009 | By: | /s/ Aaron Lamkin                     
|                       |     | Aaron Lamkin, Chief Executive Officer

I,
Steven M. Grubner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of TapSlide,
Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended April 30, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of TapSlide, Inc.

|                       |     |                                           
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|Date:    June 19, 2009 | By: | /s/ Steven M. Grubner                     
|                       |     | Steven M. Grubner, Chief Financial Officer

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (3)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(4)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ PAUL G. SAARIPAUL G. SAARISenior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 30, 2006