alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andre Rogers, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 914]

Application by the appellant pro se for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 6, 2005 *(People v Rogers,*19 AD3d 437 [2005]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 6, 2003.

Ordered that the appellant is granted leave to serve and file a brief on the issues of whether trial counsel became a witness against the defendant when he submitted his pro se motion pursuant to CPL 330.30, and whether the trial court should have assigned him a new attorney in connection with CPL 330.30 motion; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to County Law § 722, the following named attorney is assigned as counsel: Joseph Faraguna, Esq. EO. Box 122 Sag Harbor, N.Y. 11963, and it is further,

Ordered that assigned counsel shall serve and file a brief expeditiously in accordance with this court’s rules *(see*22 NYCRR 670.1 *et seq.)*and written directions; and it is further,

*733Ordered that the application is held in abeyance in the interim. Krausman, J.R, Fisher, Lifson and Covello, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
      32


Section
      1350 Certifications





**STATEMENT
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned is the Financial Officer of Imperiali Inc.  This
      Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002.
      This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Imperiali
      Inc for the quarter ended February 28, 2007.





The
      undersigned certifies that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
      information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Imperiali Inc
      as
      of February 28, 2007.





This
      Certification is executed as of September 19, 2008.




/s
            Daniel
              ImperatoInterim
                Non-Executive Chairman Emeritus








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      us, and will be retained by Imperiali Inc and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 8, 2012 

jam 

Order 

 

February 8, 2012 

144576 (20) 

IN RE JERRY SIMS, SC: 144576 

___________________________________ COA: 304023 

 

JERRY SIMS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v 

 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

 Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $7.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

 If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$368.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. 

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

 The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, James M. Dahmus, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SGS International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                  |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|November 13, 2006 |  | /s/ James M. Dahmus    
|                  |  | James M. Dahmus        
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-11-0000013

10-JUL-2015

01:08 PM
Gibbons 

J. 

appellant's alleged written statements on the report were of reasonable 

concern to any government agency to which appellant distributed the 

report. NRS 41.637 (1997); John, 125 Nev. at 753, 762, 219 P.3d at 1281, 

1287. As to appellant's alleged slanderous statements about respondent to 

the marshals, false statements made to police officers are not "protected 

activity" within the meaning of the anti-SLAPP statute. See Lefebvre v. 

Lefebvre, 131 Cal. Rptr. 3d 171, 175 (Ct. App. 2011) (holding that the act of 

making a false police report is not an act in furtherance of the 

constitutional rights of petition or free speech). Accordingly, we conclude 

that the district court did not err in finding that appellant failed to meet 

his burden to prevail on an anti-SLAPP special motion to dismiss, and 

therefore we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.' 

cc: Hon. Joanna Kishner, District Judge 

Israel Kunin, Settlement Judge 

Warm Springs Law Group 

Harold P. Gewerter, Esq., Ltd. 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'We have reviewed appellant's remaining arguments and conclude 

that they lack merit in the context of an appeal from an order denying a 

special motion to dismiss. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 9e)1>
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of TaxMasters, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick R. Cox, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Patrick R. Cox


Patrick R. Cox, Chief Executive Officer


March April 15, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - August 2006 

Benefit payments August 2006 August 2005 

Regular Retirement 

and Survivor Benefits 

Total 

Retired employ

Spouses and d

Widow(er)s - a

Other survivors 

ees 

ivorced spouses 

ged and disabled 

22,882,000 

94,005,000 

157,004,000 

$790,692,000 

516,800,000 

22,035,000 

91,181,000 

154,952,000 

$763,537,000 

495,369,000 

Average under 

Being paid Awarded in Social Security 

Monthly benefits end of month month August 2006 

Number Average1 Number Average1 Being Paid Awarded 

Total 585,100 ......... 2,700 ......... ......... .........

Regular employee annuities, total 279,700 $1,825 1,200 $2,463 ......... .........

 Age 195,500 1,785 2 600 2 2,914 $1,008 3 $1,158

 Disability, Full Retirement Age and Over 34,000 1,625 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Disability, Under Full Retirement Age 50,200 2,116 400 2,335 945 996 

Spouses and divorced spouses 138,500 670 800 855 486 347 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 139,900 1,114 600 1,493 956 772 

Widowed mothers and fathers 900 1,421 4/ 1,282 731 718 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 14,600 742 100 854 5/ 5/ 

Children 11,500 823 100 1,102 659 652 

Other survivors 4/ 803 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Benefit payments 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

August 

2006 

$5,085,000 

August 

2005 

$5,180,000 

Number 

121,400 

Average 

$42 600 

Number

$41 

Average 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement. 

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 36); some 200

 other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis. 

4

Fewer than 50. 

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers. 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. 

Regular retirement and survivor benefit payments total includes hospital insurance benefits for services in Canada. 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

August 2006 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Average payment 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period

 Per

 full week 

Unemployment 2,200 $501 $279 

Sickness 6,200 

August 2006 

506 

Benefit payments 

283 

August 2005 

Unemployment

Total 

1,742,000 

$5,240,000 $6,341,000

2,006,000 

Sickness 3,499,000 4,334,000 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited). Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.

 Recycled

 Paper 

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 21, 2015

No. 04-14-00904-CR

Jonathan Matthew ESCOBEDO,

Appellant

v.

The State of TexasAppellee/s

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-09-0117-CRA

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received 

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellant’s brief 

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to August 17, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Richard E. Langlois

Law Offices Of Richard E. Langlois

217 Arden Grove

San Antonio, TX 78215

Rene M. Pena

81st District Attorney

1327 3rd Street

Floresville, TX 78114
P.O. Box I 2667 

CAPITOL STATION 

AUSTIN, TEXAS 787 I 1-2667 

JOE@JOELONGLEY .COM 

Jeffrey D. Kyle 

Clerk 

Court of Appeals 

Third District of Texas 

P.O. Box 12547 

Austin, TX 78711 

LAW OFFICES 

OF 

JOE K. LONGLEY I 609 SHOAL CREEK BOULEVARD 

SUITE I 00 

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701-1 022 

July 21, 2015 

5 I 2/477-4444 

800/792-4444 

5 I 2/477-4470 FAX 

WWW.JOELONGLEY.COM 

via email 

RE: Court of Appeals No. 03-15-00436-CV; Charles 0. "Chuck" Grigson v. 

State of Texas and Farmers Group, Inc., et al. Appellees' Joint Motion to 

Dismiss Appeal for Lack of Appellate Jurisdiction and Request for 

Expedited Consideration; and Appellees' Joint Response to Appellate 

Grigson's Emergency Motion to Stay the Sending of Class Notice. 

Dear Mr. Kyle: 

Counsel for Appellant Chuck Grigson received the Appellees' joint filings 

referenced above on Monday, July 20, 2015. Please make the Court aware of Appellant's 

desire to respond to both filings. 

Thank you for your courtesy in this matter. 

With kindest regards, 

JKL/mep 

cc via email: 

Sara Waitt 

Joshua Godbey 

M. Scott Incerto 

Marcy Greer 

Joe Blanks 

Michael Woods 

Joe K. Longley 

ACCEPTED

03-15-00436-CV

6149123

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

7/21/2015 9:23:47 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/21/2015 9:23:47 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                     /s/ Gerald Bachmeier |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Gerald      Bachmeier                                                                                          |
|   | Chief      Executive Officer                                                                                   |
|   |                                                                                                           |
|   | Dated:      November 19, 2010                                                                                  |

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Felix Rosario, Appellant.

[855 NYS2d 409]

No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Williams, Buckley and Acosta, JJ.
#### In the Matter of John Greene, Petitioner, v New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development et al., Respondents.

[853 NYS2d 327]

HPD’s determination that the subject apartment was not petitioner’s primary residence, a violation of his occupancy agreement, which incorporated the terms of a 1987 regulatory agreement between the City and Mutual, is supported by substantial evidence *(see Matter of Kaufman v New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev.,*45 AD3d 257 [2007]; *Matter of Howard o New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev.,*294 AD2d 278 [2002], *Iv denied*99 NY2d 504 [2002]). Petitioner admitted that he resided in another location, he offered no evidence that he had ever resided in the subject apartment, and he testified that, despite his intention to live there with his domestic partner and their daughter, he never moved into the apartment with them. Indeed, petitioner does not challenge these findings. He argues instead that he was curing his noncompliance with the primary residence requirement of the aforementioned agreements, that Mutual is barred by laches or the stat*346ute of limitations, or both, from evicting him, and that unique circumstances render excusable his extended physical absence from the apartment.

Petitioner’s failure to use the apartment as his primary residence, as required by the agreements, is not curable *(see e.g. Matter of O’Quinn v New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev.,*284 AD2d 211, 212 [2001]). HPD’s finding, which is supported by substantial evidence, that Mutual was unaware of petitioner’s noncompliance defeats his laches defense *(see Macon v Arnlie Realty Co.,*207 AD2d 268, 271 [1994]), and the continuing nature of petitioner’s obligation to use the apartment as his primary residence renders the statute of limitations inapplicable *(see generally Lenox Hill Hosp. v Spitz,*1 Misc 3d 134[A], 2004 NY Slip Op 50027[U] [2004]). Finally, petitioner’s explanations do not render his extended physical absence from the apartment “excusable for purposes of primary residence analysis” *(Hudson St. Equities Group v Escoffier,*11 Misc 3d 63, 64 [2006], *affd*45 AD3d 371 [2007]). Concur—Lippman, P.J., Andrias, Williams and McGuire, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00147-CV

CITY OF LAREDO, TEXAS,

Appellant

v.

Julian Jacobo REYNA,

Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CVQ-000557 D3

Honorable Beckie Palomo, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order denying the City 

of Laredo’s plea to the jurisdiction is REVERSED and judgment is RENDERED that Julian Jacobo 

Reyna’s claims against the City of Laredo are dismissed with prejudice. We order Julian Jacobo 

Reyna to pay all costs of the appeal. 

SIGNED July 22, 2015.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
NRRIT

Annual Management Report 

for Fiscal Year 2020 






TRUSTEES: 

 Chair: Mary S. Jones 

 Vice President and Treasurer 

 (Retired) 

 Union Pacific Corporation 

George J. Francisco, Jr. 

President Emeritus 

National Conference of Firemen and 

 Oilers - SEIU 

Beth Miller 

Treasurer 

BNSF Railway Company 

Christopher R. Neikirk 

VP & Treasurer 

Norfolk Southern Corporation 

Joel Parker 

Labor Trustee 

William F. Quinn 

Independent Trustee 

William C. Walpert 

National Secretary-Treasurer Emeritus 

Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers 

 and Trainmen (BLET) 

January 31, 2021 

Mr. Robert Fairweather 

Acting Director 

Executive Office of the President 

Office of Management and Budget 

725 17th Street, Northwest 

Washington, DC 20503 

Dear Acting Director Fairweather: 

Section 105 of the Railroad Retirement and Survivors’ Improvement Act of 2001 

requires the National Railroad Retirement Investment Trust to submit an annual 

management report on its operations and financial condition. 

The enclosed report fulfills this statutory requirement for the Trust's fiscal year 2020, 

October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020. 

Sincerely, 

The Board of Trustees 

______________________________ ______________________________ 

Mary S. Jones, Chair George J. Francisco, Jr. 

______________________________ ______________________________ 

Beth Miller Christopher R. Neikirk 

______________________________ ______________________________ 

Joel Parker William F. Quinn 

______________________________ 

William C. Walpert 

Enclosure
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
 
Parent of Bay State Gas Company -- None
 
Subsidiaries of Registrant -- Northern Utilities, Inc.
                           -- Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc.
 
Subsidiaries of Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc. -- Natural Gas Development,
                                                     Inc.
                                         -- Bay State Energy Enterprises, Inc.
                                         -- EnergyUSA, Inc.
                                                     -- EnergyEXPRESS, Inc.
 
Subsidiaries of EnergyUSA, Inc. -- SavageAlert, Inc.
                                -- EnergySPE, Inc.
 
Subsidiaries of SavageAlert, Inc. -- Alert, Inc.
                           -- Alert Scientific, Inc.
                           -- Alert Air Systems, Inc.
                           -- Alert Mechanical Services, Inc.
                           -- Savage Engineering, Inc.
 
     Each subsidiary is wholly owned. Northern Utilities, Inc. and Granite State
Gas Transmission, Inc. are incorporated in the State of New Hampshire. Bay State
Energy Enterprises, Inc., EnergyUSA, Inc., EnergyEXPRESS, Inc., EnergySPE, Inc.,
Alert Air Systems, Inc. and Natural Gas Development, Inc. are incorporated in
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. SavageAlert, Inc., Alert, Inc., Alert
Scientific, Inc., Alert Mechanical Services, Inc. and Savage Engineering, Inc.
are incorporated in the State of Connecticut.
 
                                       56