alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          34,292
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              15
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                28,150
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    121,474
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          85,155
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            86,465
<LOANS>                                        512,429
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,730
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 845,488
<DEPOSITS>                                     718,661
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             17,528
<LONG-TERM>                                     32,312
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,185
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,802
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 845,488
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 44,744
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               11,755
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                56,499
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              22,924
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,326
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           31,173
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,129
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 208
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 28,082
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,892
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      13,892
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,401
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.68
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   7.827
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,314
<LOANS-PAST>                                       787
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 7,800
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,502
<RECOVERIES>                                       303
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,730
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,730
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,667
        

</TABLE>
BLS Technical Advisory Committee November 16, 2023

 

10:00 am Acting Commissioner’s Welcome and Review of Agency Developments

10:30 am Using Record Linkage Techniques to Improve Data Import Rates into the Survey of 

Occupational Injuries and Illnesses

Presenter: Elan Segarra, BLS Office of Compensation and Working Conditions

Discussants: Jared Murray, University of Texas at Austin

Julia Silge, Posit PBC

12:00 pm Lunch

1:00 pm Development of Small Domain Estimation Models for Occupational Requirements 

Survey (ORS) 

Presenter: Xingyou Zhang, BLS Office of Compensation and Working Conditions

Discussants: Matt Williams, RTI International

Brady West, University of Michigan

2:30 pm Productivity Dispersion Statistics for Retail Trade (OPT and OPLC)

Presenter: Dominic Smith, BLS Office of Prices and Living Conditions

Discussants: Michael Mandel, Progressive Policy Institute

Marshall Reinsdorf, Economic Consultant and Supporting Editor for the 

2025 SNA

4:00 pm Conclusion

All times Eastern Standard Time. Please contact BLSTAC@bls.gov for questions.

Virtual Registration at https://blstac.eventbrite.com
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID BROWN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

STATE OF HAWAII; LAURA

THIELEN; NANCY MCMAHON, in her

official capacity; MELANIE CHINEN,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-15000

D.C. No. 1:07-cv-00556-ACKLEK

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

Alan C. Kay, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 16, 2011

Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: TASHIMA, W. FLETCHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

David Brown appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the

State of Hawaii, Melanie Chinen, and various defendants in their official

capacities. We affirm.

FILED

MAR 25 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Brown argues that Hawaii’s State Historic Preservation Division (“SHPD”)

is violating the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, 24

U.S.C. § 3001 et seq., by failing to properly inventory and care for Native

Hawaiian human remains under its control. We agree with the district court that

Brown did not meet the requirements for permanent injunctive relief because he

did not demonstrate that he faced immediate or irreparable injury. See G.C. & K.B.

Invs., Inc. v. Wilson, 326 F.3d 1096, 1107 (9th Cir. 2003); Reno Air Racing Ass’n

v. McCord, 452 F.3d 1126, 1137 n.11 (9th Cir. 2006). 

Brown also argues that the State, and Chinen in her individual capacity,

decided not to renew his contract in retaliation for his criticisms of the SHPD. 

Most of Brown’s speech was made “pursuant to his official duties” and was

therefore unprotected under Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006). Some of

Brown’s speech was protected, but Brown failed to controvert Chinen’s declaration

that she was unaware of the protected speech at the time she decided not to renew

Brown’s contract. Therefore, Brown’s protected speech could not have motivated

Chinen to retaliate against him. See Keyser v. Sacramento City Unified Sch. Dist.,

265 F.3d 741, 751 (9th Cir. 2001). 

Finally, Brown appeals the award of attorney’s fees to the State and Chinen. 

Because Brown did not file a separate notice of appeal after the fee award was
3

entered, we have no jurisdiction to review this claim. Leslie v. Grupo ICA, 198

F.3d 1152, 1160 (9th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED; appeal from fee award DISMISSED.
#### BLAKE v. CLYDE PORCELAIN STEEL CORPORATION et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

March 17, 1945.

See, also, D.C., 7 F.R.D. 768.

Harry Sena, New York City, for plaintiff.

Sydney D. Robins, New York City, for defendants.

CAFFEY, District Judge.

The plaintiff moves to strike out two affirmative defenses raised by the answer.

The action is for commissions or upon a quantum meruit for services rendered in getting customers for products of one or both of the two defendants. Only one defendant (Artkraft) is involved in the pres-sent motion.

The defenses sought to be stricken allege that the plaintiff did not efficiently perform his services as agreed and that the defendant (Artkraft) was required to use other persons to obtain contracts; also it is alleged that such defendant was compelled to incur large expense in engaging others to obtain contracts which the plaintiff should have procured and to spend large sums of money in performing the contracts for customers.

Plaintiff makes the objection that what is set up is not properly a defense, but is a *456counterclaim. In view of Rule 54(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., however, this difference may be overlooked (Cf. last sentence of subdivision (c) of Rule 8 and subdivision (a) of Rule 13).

Nevertheless, the rights of the plaintiff should be safeguarded and, out of abundance of caution, those rights will be adequately protected by preserving to him the privilege of renewing the motion at the trial. Chasan v. Mutual Factors, Inc., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 3 F.R.D. 477.

The plaintiff cites Weill v. Goodman, Shirt Waists, Sup.Ct.App.T. 1st Dept., 102 Misc. 524, 169 N.Y.S. 47; but in the light of the rules I think it does not give him any support.

Motion denied, without prejudice to renewal at the trial.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31252-31253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15491]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Miami University, et al.

Notice of Consolidated Decision on Applicationsfor Duty-Free Entry 
of Electron Microscopes

This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 
(Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR 
part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 
P.M. in Room 3705, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution 
Avenue., NW, Washington, D.C.
Docket Number: 09-014. Applicant: Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056. 
Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL, Japan. Intended 
Use: See notice at 74 FR 23394, May 19, 2009.
Docket Number: 09-018. Applicant: Texas A&M University, College 
Station, TX 77843-4458. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: 
FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 23394, 
May 19, 2009.
Docket Number: 09-020. Applicant: Columbia University, New York, NY 
10032. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, the 
Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 23394, May 19, 2009.
Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign

[[Page 31253]]

instrument, for such purposes as these instruments are intended to be 
used, was being manufactured in the United States at the time the 
instruments were ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an 
electron microscope and is intended for research or scientific 
educational uses requiring an electron microscope. We know of no 
electron microscope, or any other instrument suited to these purposes, 
which was being manufactured in the United States at the time of order 
of each instrument.

    Dated: June 22, 2009.
Christopher Cassel,
Acting Director.
Subsidies Enforcement Office.
Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-15491 Filed 6-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Lentec Imaging, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual
Report"), we, Jeff D. Jenson, President and Jason Jenson, Secretary/Treasurer
of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.


Dated:  3/17/2006                           /s/ Jeff D. Jenson
      ---------                           -------------------------
                                          Jeff D. Jenson
                                          President and Director


Dated:  3/17/2006                           /s/ Jason Jenson
      ---------                           -------------------------
                                          Jason Jenson
                                          Secretary and Treasurer
<PAGE>
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

The State of Texas for the Best Interest and 

Protection of L.A.

No. 06-15-00028-CV

Appeal from the County Court of Hopkins 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. M15-00051). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief 

Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was error in the order of the 

court below. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s order for temporary inpatient mental health 

services and render judgment ordering L.A.’s immediate release from detention.

We further order that the appellee, The State of Texas, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JULY 17, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
IN THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

JOSHUA LONDON §

§

VS. § CASE NO. PD 480-15

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS §

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

NOW COMES, the appellant, Joshua London, by and through his assistant public

defender Jani J. Maselli Wood, and respectfully moves the Court to grant an extension of time

to file the brief in this case and in support would show the Court the following:

I.

The petition for discretionary for review was filed with this Court on May 1, 2015. 

Review was granted on June 24, 2015.

II.

The brief is due on July 24, 2015. Counsel is requesting an additional two weeks to finish

this brief, until August 7, 2015.

III.

The request is based upon the following:

Briefs/PDR’s filed:

7/15/2015 - Brief in Shaun Briggs v. State, 01-15-00269-CR;

7/14/2013 - PDR in Gregorio Guerrero v. State, PD 0665-15, 0666-15;

7/13/2015 - PDR in Kenneth McAfee v. State, PD 0667-15;

PD-0480-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 7/23/2015 11:15:06 AM

Accepted 7/23/2015 11:26:18 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
7/2/2015 - Reply brief filed in Mary Kuol v. State, 14-14-01008-CR;

6/28/2015 - Brief filed in Marcus Lewis v. State, 14-14-00779-CR;

Motion for Rehearing Due

7/23/2015 - Motion for Rehearing to CCA in Peraza v. State, PD 0100-15, 0101-15;

IV.

This request is not made to delay the proceedings but to ensure London is effectively

represented.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, appellant respectfully prays that this

Court grant this motion and set a due date for Mr. London’s brief on August 7, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

ALEXANDER BUNIN

Chief Public Defender

Harris County Texas 

Jani J Maselli Wood

___________________________________

JANI J. MASELLI WOOD

Assistant Public Defender

State Bar No. 00791195

1201 Franklin Street, 13 Floor th

Houston, TX 77002

(713) 274-6721

Attorney for Appellant,

Joshua London

-2-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to Tex. R. App. Proc. 9.5, this certifies that on July 23, 2015, a copy of the

foregoing was emailed to Lisa McMinn, State Prosecuting Attorney, and the Harris

County District Attorney’s Office through texfile.com at the following address:

Eric Kugler

Assistant District Attorney

1201 Franklin Street, 6th Floor

Houston, TX 77002

kugler_eric@dao.hctx.net

Lisa McMinn

Lisa.McMinn@SPA.texas.gov

Jani Maselli Wood

_________________________________

JANI J. MASELLI WOOD

-3-
-4-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>                 THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                         EXTRACTED FROM THE COASTAL 1987 DRILLING PROGRAM, LTD.
                         FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER
                         31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
                         TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              51
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      148
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   199
<PP&E>                                          17,762
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,918
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              169
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,043
<SALES>                                            711
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   716
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      584
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    132
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                132
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       132
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
|EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of RehabCare Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I Vincent L. Germanese, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange

Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                      
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition

and results of operations of the Company.

| |    
| | ---
| | By:
| |    
| |    

|
|
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          34,857
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       194
<OTHER-SE>                                     (35,046)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               22,234
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (22,234)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (22,234)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (22,234)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (22,234)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)
        


</TABLE>