alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Owens-Illinois Group,Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that to such officer’s knowledge:

(i)           the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the yearended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

(ii)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
| Dated: March 1, 2007 |   | /s/ Edward C. White        |   |
|----------------------|--------|----------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | Edward C. White            |
|                 |   | President                  |
|                 |   | Owens-Illinois Group, Inc. |

 

----

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Exhibit 32.1

                  Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                       As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Procyon Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do certify, to our
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 28, 2009

/s/ Regina W. Anderson
Regina W. Anderson
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ James B. Anderson
James B. Anderson
Chief Financial Officer
#### GLAUBER v. AGEE DEPARTMENT STORES et al.

No. 180.

District Court, W. D. Kentucky, at Paducah.

Dec. 26, 1939.

Waller & Threlkeld, of Paducah, Ky., for plaintiff.

C. C. Grassham, of Paducah, Ky., and Okey P. Keadle, of Huntington, W. Va., for defendant.

MILLER, District Judge.

Plaintiff’s motion for a jury trial is objected to by defendants on the ground (1) that the motion comes too late; and (2) the action is an equitable one in which the plaintiff is not entitled to a trial by jury.

There is no question that if the action be construed as an equitable one the plaintiff is not entitled to a jury trial. The petition seeks the rescission of a contract between the plaintiff and defendant on the ground of fraud. Such an action is essentially an equitable one. However, the amended petition apparently abandons this type of relief and asks for.damages suffered by_reason__of the fraud. Although the shift from a claim of equitable relief to a claim for common law relief is not definitely set up by the amended petition, yet the Court construes the amended petition as abandoning any claim for rescission of the contract and asking solely for damages suffered by reason of the alleged fraud. Accordingly, the request for a jury trial is made at the time when the plaintiff was first entitled to make such a request, and is within the time provided by Section 38 (b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

The motion for a jury trial is sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of VS Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended
March 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas A. Tolworthy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of VS Holdings, Inc.
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 12, 2009



/s/ Thomas A. TolworthyThomas A. TolworthyChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Susser
Holdings Corporation (the Company) for the three months ended September 27, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sam L. Susser, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 6, 2009



/s/ Sam L. SusserSam L. SusserPresident and Chief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 31.1

Form 10-KSB Certifications

I, W. Gerald Newmin, certify that:      
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Exten Industries, Inc.;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 
a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 
b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and 
c)
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 
b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.         
Date: November 17, 2003         
/S/  W. Gerald Newmin
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 15a0509n.06

Case Nos. 14-3956/3964

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

DESEAN R. HARBIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED 

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 

THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF 

OHIO

O R D E R

Before: SILER, COOK, and WHITE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. At Desean Harbin’s sentencing, the district court applied the career 

offender enhancement, USSG § 4B1.1. The issue before this court is whether Harbin’s prior 

burglary conviction constitutes a “crime of violence” under the residual clause of the career 

offender enhancement, USSG § 4B1.2(a)(2). In Johnson v. United States, No. 13-7120, 2015 

WL 2473450, at *4–5 (U.S. June 26, 2015), the Supreme Court held that the identically worded 

residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) is void for vagueness. Compare

USSG § 4B1.2(a)(2), with 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). We have interpreted both residual 

clauses identically. See United States v. Ford, 560 F.3d 420, 421 (6th Cir. 2009); United States 

v. Houston, 187 F.3d 593, 594–95 (6th Cir. 1999). Following Johnson, the Supreme Court has 

vacated the sentences of offenders who were sentenced under the residual clause of the 

Sentencing Guidelines. See United States v. Maldonado, 581 F. App’x 19, 22–23 (2d Cir. 2014), 
Case Nos. 14-3956/3964, United States v. Harbin

- 2 -

vacated, No. 14-7445, 2015 WL 2473524, at *1 (U.S. June 30, 2015); Beckles v. United States, 

579 F. App’x 833, 833–34 (11th Cir. 2014), vacated, No. 14-7390, 2015 WL 2473527, at *1 

(U.S. June 30, 2015); see also Wynn v. United States, No 14-9634, 2015 WL 2095652, at *1 

(U.S. June 30, 2015) (vacating a Sixth Circuit order, which denied habeas relief based on a 

predicate offense qualifying under the residual clause of the career offender enhancement). 

Accordingly, Harbin is entitled to the same relief as offenders sentenced under the residual 

clause of the ACCA. See United States v. Darden, No. 14-5537 (6th Cir. Jul. 6, 2015) (per 

curiam). 

For these reasons, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand for 

reconsideration in light of Johnson.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# DATE AND TIME:

 Monday, July 6, 2009; 11 a.m. EDT. 

# PLACE:

 Via Teleconference: Public Dial in—1-800-597-7623, Conference ID #17168618. 

## Meeting Agenda 

This meeting is open to the public. 

I. Approval of Agenda. 

II. Program Planning. 
    - National Civil Rights Conference.

III. Adjourn. 

# CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

 Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116. 

Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-8116. 

Dated: June 24, 2009. 

David Blackwood, 

General Counsel.

 [FR Doc. E9-15374 Filed 6-24-09; 4:45 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
Order entered July 13, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00049-CR

MELVIN LEE VAUGHN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-60500-T

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On June 30, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s 

brief had not been filed. On July 9, 2015, we received appellant’s brief, together with an 

extension motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the June 30, 

2015 order requiring findings.

We GRANT appellant’s July 9, 2015 motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed as of 

the date of this order. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
----

| Name of Subsidiaryand Name underWhich SubsidiaryTransacts Business |   |   |    State of Incorporation |   |   |    Address of Subsidiary                         |   |   | I.R.S. Employer Identification Number |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
| First Bank (1)                                                     |   |   | North Carolina                           |   |   | 341 North Main StreetTroy, North Carolina  27371-0508 |   |   | 56-0132230                            |
|                                                               |   |   |                                     |   |   |                                                            |   |   |                                  |
| First Bancorp CapitalTrust II                                      |   |   | Delaware                                 |   |   | 341 North Main StreetTroy, North Carolina  27371-0508 |   |   | 83-6059905                            |
|                                                               |   |   |                                     |   |   |                                                            |   |   |                                  |
| First Bancorp CapitalTrust III                                     |   |   | Delaware                                 |   |   | 341 North Main StreetTroy, North Carolina  27371-0508 |   |   | 83-6059906                            |
|                                                               |   |   |                                     |   |   |                                                            |   |   |                                  |
| First Bancorp CapitalTrust IV                                      |   |   | Delaware                                 |   |   | 341 North Main StreetTroy, North Carolina  27371-0508 |   |   | 65-6465193                            |

----
C HIEF J USTICE

C AROLYN W RIGHT

J USTICES

D AVID L. B RIDGES

M OLLY F RANCIS

D OUGLAS S. L ANG

E LIZABETH L ANG

- M IERS

R OBERT M. F ILLMORE

L ANA M YERS

D AVID E VANS

D AVID L EWIS

A DA B ROW N

C RAIG S TODDART

B ILL W HITEHILL

D AVID J. S CHENCK 

# Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

600 C OMMERCE S TREET

, S UITE 200

D ALLAS

, T EXAS 75202

(214) 712

- 3400 L ISA M ATZ

CLERK OF THE COURT

(214) 712

- 3450

lisa.matz@ 5th.txcourts.gov

G AYLE H UMPA

BUSINESS ADMINISTRAT OR

(214) 712

- 3434

gayle.humpa@ 5th.txcourts.gov

F ACSIMILE

(214) 745

- 1083

I NTERNET

HTTP :// 5 TH

. TXCOURTS

. GOV



## September 20, 2016

Dan E. Martens Collin Dean Kennedy

The Law Office of Dan E. Martens Hanshaw Kennedy, LLP

17101 Preston Rd, Suite 160 1415 Legacy Dr., Ste 350

Dallas, Texas 75248

- 1369 Frisco, TX 75034

- 1942

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 05

- 15

- 00906

- CV

Trial Court Case Number: 219

- 04978

- 2014

Style: Altesse Healthecare Solutions, Inc. and Shawna Boudreaux

v.

Allen Wilson and Becky Wilson

Dear Attorneys:

E nclosed is a corrected pg. 3 for the above

- mentioned case. Please note the following typographical

errors, which have been corrected.

1st paragraph, s econd line, omit the word “and”

2nd paragraph, end quote added to 4th line.

Sincerely,

Lisa Matz

Cler k of The Court

cc: Trial court judge

Trial court clerk
# covid_table58_c71_naics
Labor Employer Reporting Instructions 

Appendix II: Railroad Retirement Board Jurisdiction Guide 

 This referral guide provides Labor employers with an RRB contact for questions on 

subjects outside the jurisdiction of compensation reporting. 

SUBJECT OFFICE CONTACT INFORMATION 

Annual Earnings Exempt Amounts for 

Annuity Work Deductions 

Bureau of the Actuary 

Division of Benefit and Employment 

Analysis 

(312) 751-4771 

Benefit Eligibility/Payment Status Local RRB Field Office 

(877) 772-5772 

Contribution Tax Rate for RUIA Tax Bureau of Fiscal Operations 

Treasury Division 

(312) 751-4668 

Cost-of-Living Percentages Bureau of the Actuary 

Division of Benefit and Employment 

Analysis 

(312) 751-4771 

Creditable/Taxable Earnings Base 

Estimates 

Bureau of the Actuary 

Division of Benefit and Employment 

Analysis 

(312) 751-4771, (312) 751-4729 

Divorce/Garnishment Bureau of Law 

(312) 751-4944 

Form CT-1, Employer Annual Railroad 

Retirement Tax Return 

Internal Revenue Service 

(816) 926-2435 

Form DC-1, Employers Quarterly Report 

of Contributions Under the RUIA 

Bureau of Fiscal Operations 

Treasury Division 

(312) 751-4668 

Form G-88a, Retirement Contact Form Policy & Systems 

Records & Analysis Systems 

(312) 751-4808 

Form 1099-G, Statement for Receipt of 

Certain Government Payments 

(Unemployment Benefit Income Tax 

Statements) 

Local RRB Field Office 

(877) 772-5772 

Gross Earnings Reports (BA-11) Bureau of the Actuary 

Division of Benefit and Employment 

Analysis 

(312) 751-4771 

Report of Stock Options and Other 

Payments (BA-15) 

Bureau of the Actuary and Research 

Financial Interchange Division 

(312) 469-2286 

BA15@rrb.gov 
Labor Employer Reporting Instructions 

Appendix II: Railroad Retirement Board Jurisdiction Guide 

SUBJECT OFFICE CONTACT INFORMATION 

Monthly Report of Tier I Railroad 

Retirement Taxes Deducted from RUIA 

Sickness Benefits 

Bureau of Fiscal Operations 

Treasury Division 

(312) 751-4668 

Notice of Death of Annuitant Local RRB Field Office 

(877) 772-5772 

Reports of Supplemental Tax Credits and 

Tax Liabilities (Forms G-88p, and G-88R) 

Policy & Systems 

Records & Analysis Systems 

(312) 751-4808 

RRB-1099/1099-R, Statement for U.S. 

Citizen Recipients of Payments by the 

Railroad Retirement Board 

Form RRB-1042S, Statement for Nonresident Alien Recipients of Payments by 

the Railroad Retirement Board 

(Retirement Benefit Income Tax 

Statements) 

Local RRB Field Office 

(877) 772-5772 

Policy & Systems 

Records & Analysis Systems 

(312) 751-4810 

Informational Conference Program and/or 

Schedule 

Labor Member's Office 

(312) 751-4905 

Request for Lien Amount Operations – RUIA Adjudication 

Claims Adjustment and Settlement 

Section 

(312) 751-4825
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50166 Summary Calendar

JOSE OSCAR CHAVEZ-DOMINGUEZ, also known as Jose Antonio Chavez, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus SAN ANTONIO POLICE DEPARTMENT; MARTI LAURENZ; AL A. PHILIPPUS, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-00-CV-629

- - - - - - - - - - October 24, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Oscar Chavez-Dominguez (Chavez) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to prosecute. See F ED . R. C IV . P. 41(b). Although Chavez did not file any pleading entitled “notice of appeal,” he did file within the appeal period a pleading which evinced an intent to appeal and which identified Chavez as the party appealing as well as the judgment he sought to appeal. See F ED . R. A PP . P. 3(c)(1)(A)&(B);No. 02-50166 -2- Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Because the pleading did not identify the court to which the appeal was being taken, this court’s jurisdiction over this appeal is uncertain.
See F ED . R. A PP . P. 3(c)(1)(C); cf. , Smith v. Barry , 502 U.S. 244, 248 (1992); McLemore v. Landry , 898 F.2d 996, 999 (5th Cir. 1990). A determination on this point is unnecessary, however, as the district court’s dismissal for failure to prosecute was not an abuse of discretion. See McNeal v. Papasan , 842 F.2d 787, 789-90 (5th Cir. 1988); United States v. Alvarez , 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000). Chavez has been deported to El Salvador and, despite an order from the district court, failed to appear for the docket call and failed to offer any explanation of how he intends to pursue this action from another country. This appeal is therefore frivolous. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. APPEAL DISMISSED.