alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.02
                                                                  -------------



                                 CERTIFICATION


I, Debi B. Halbert, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of ProFutures Diversified Fund,
L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
     to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
     its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
     and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
     most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
     case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
     likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
     financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting.



Date:  March 29, 2006



/s/ Debi B. Halbert


-------------------------------------

Debi B. Halbert, Chief Financial Officer
ProFutures, Inc., General Partner
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 534 

Recognizing the 60th anniversary of the U.S. Open of Surfing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2019 

Mr. ROUDA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 60th anniversary of the U.S. Open of 

Surfing. 

Whereas the 60th U.S. Open of Surfing will take place from 

July 27 to August 4, 2019, in Huntington Beach, California; 

Whereas the surfing competition has taken place annually in 

Huntington Beach since 1959; 

Whereas the U.S. Open of Surfing attracts hundreds of thousands of people to Huntington Beach every year; 

Whereas Huntington Beach is known as ‘‘Surf City USA’’; 

Whereas the competition, formerly called the West Coast 

Surfing Championship, the United States Surfing Championships, and Ocean Pacific Pro, established its current 

name in 1994; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 534 IH 

Whereas the U.S. Open of Surfing awards a $10,000 first 

place prize, one of the largest prize purses in the industry; 

Whereas the competition serves as a World Surf League 

qualifier; 

Whereas the entire event is free and open to the public and 

includes activities such as customization workshops, onsite surfboard shaping, art installations, and more; 

Whereas the event was extended to include other action 

sports, including skateboarding and BMX; 

Whereas Jack Haley and Linda Benson were the first champions of the competition in 1959, in the male and female 

categories, respectively; 

Whereas Corky Carroll won the competition in 1966, 1967, 

and 1969, and later became the first professional surfer 

as well as the first surfer offered paid endorsements; 

Whereas Joyce Hoffman, after winning the U.S. Open of 

Surfing four times, became the first internationally recognized female surfer; 

Whereas notable surfers are inducted into the Surfing Walk 

of Fame and to the Surfers’ Hall of Fame as part of the 

event; 

Whereas the local hero award is presented to a surfer who 

has resided in Huntington Beach for at least 10 years or 

has graduated from the Huntington Union School District, has contributed to Huntington surfing culture, and 

has been a finalist in surfing competitions; 

Whereas the 2019 class of inductees into the Surfing Walk 

of Fame and the Surfer’s Hall of Fame are Derek Ho 

and Joel Tudor (as Surf Champions), Reynolds ‘‘Renny’’ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 534 IH 

Yater (Surf Pioneer), Jeff Divine and Art Brewer (Surf 

Culture), Courtney Conlogue (Woman of the Year), Sam 

Hawk (Local Hero), and Don MacAllister (Honor Roll); 

and 

Whereas the event brings approximately $16,000,000 in revenue to the Huntington Beach economy and approximately $20,000,000 in revenue to the Orange County 

economy annually: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the 60th anniversary of the annual U.S. Open of 

3 Surfing as a significant event for the global surfing com4 munity and for the important role it plays in the economy 

5 of Huntington Beach. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Order entered July 21, 2015 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00805-CV 

IN RE GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 1 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. cc-14-02324-A 

ORDER 

Before the Court is relator’s motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. We 

GRANT the motion. Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the petition for 

writ of mandamus. We ORDER each party to bear its own costs of this original proceeding. 

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

 JUSTICE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Felix Velez, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 882]

*468Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert E. Torres, J.), rendered November 21, 2008, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s request for a missing witness charge, since there was no evidence that the uncalled officer could have provided material, noncumulative testimony. The trial evidence failed to establish that this officer was in a position to see the transaction *(see People v Dianda,*70 NY2d 894 [1987]; *People v Brunner,*67 AD3d 464, 465 [2009], *affd*16 NY3d 820 [2011]; *compare People v Kitching,*78 NY2d 532, 538 [1991]). The court accorded defendant sufficient scope in which to comment in summation on this officer’s absence, and it properly exercised its discretion in limiting defense arguments on this-issue. In any event, we find that any error in the court’s denial of a missing witness charge or in its limitations on defendant’s summation was harmless *(see People v Thomas,*21 NY3d 226, 231 [2013]). Concur — Tom, J.R, Friedman, Acosta, Moskowitz and Gische, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 916 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 916

 Recognizing the heroism of our Nation's health care workers and first 
responders, including doctors, nurses, emergency medical services (EMS) 
 professionals, medical staff, pharmacists, law enforcement personnel, 
         and military personnel, during the COVID-19 pandemic.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 7, 2020

Mr. Budd submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the heroism of our Nation's health care workers and first 
responders, including doctors, nurses, emergency medical services (EMS) 
 professionals, medical staff, pharmacists, law enforcement personnel, 
         and military personnel, during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Whereas there are approximately 18,000,000 health care workers, 1,130,000 
        firefighters, 891,000 emergency medical services (EMS) professionals, 
        and 63,000,000 volunteers in the United States;
Whereas the men and women working in our Nation's health care facilities are 
        putting their lives on the line to protect their fellow Americans who 
        are suffering from COVID-19;
Whereas despite the shortage of protective gear in many of our Nation's 
        hospitals, health care workers continue to show up and risk their lives 
        to save the lives of others;
Whereas these men and women continue to go above and beyond the call of duty to 
        serve citizens across the Nation;
Whereas law enforcement officers continue to check in on their neighbors and 
        keep our communities safe;
Whereas no part of our Nation could successfully battle this pandemic without 
        the coordination and assistance of our first responders and health care 
        providers;
Whereas first responders serve as key sources of information to community and 
        national leaders; and
Whereas when people need help, these first responders are always counted upon to 
        assist: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) health care workers and first responders should be 
        recognized for their bravery and contributions during this 
        global pandemic; and
            (2) the Federal Government should continue to honor the 
        sacrifice these men and women make every day.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Affinion Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Nathaniel J. Lipman,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 29, 2011



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Nathaniel J. Lipman
|Nathaniel J. Lipman    
|Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23.2

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  333-30604)  pertaining  to the  Non-Statutory  Stock  Option  Plan  for
Directors and the Stock  Incentive Plan of the Franklin  Holding  Corporation of
our report dated March 5, 2004,  with respect to the  financial  statements  and
financial  highlights  of Franklin  Capital  Corporation  (formerly The Franklin
Holding  Corporation)  in the  Annual  Report  (Form  10-K)  for the year  ended
December 31, 2004.

/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP
New York, New York
March 30, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-70,701]

Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on May 28, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Zebra Technologies, Inc., Vernon Hills, Illinois.

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition (TA-W-70,463) filed on May 22, 2009 that is the subject of an ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of June 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-15760 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6416

ANTHONY FIELDS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN STEVENS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. 

(0:13-cv-02679-TMC)

Submitted: July 21, 2015 Decided: July 24, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Fields, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant 

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Fields seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his 

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 

60(b) motion for reconsideration. We dismiss the appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district 

court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period 

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of 

appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles 

v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s orders were entered on the docket on 

July 25, 2014 & February 5, 2015 respectively. The notice of 

appeal was filed on March 11, 2015.* Because Fields failed to file 

a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening 

of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We deny Fields’ 

motions for a certificate of appealability, to compel production 

of document, and for discovery. We dispense with oral argument 

 * For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could 

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to 

the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 

(1988).
3

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
FOM1 705 

705.5 Social Security Certification 

Refer to RCM – SSC for Social Security Certification Procedure. 

FOM1 705 Introduction and Payment Jurisdiction Revised Apr 5, 2017 Page 1 of 1
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - April 2002 

Benefit payments April 2002 April 2001 

Total $727,253,000 $698,329,000 

Retired employees 455,791,000 438,983,000 

Regular Retirement Spouses and divorced spouses 87,037,000 86,702,000 

and Survivor Benefits Widow(er)s - aged and disabled 162,714,000 151,422,000 

Other survivors 21,711,000 21,209,000 

Number Average1 Number Average1 

Total 648,100 ......... 3,400 ......... ......... 

Regular employee annuities, total 298,300 $1,506 1,500 $2,084 ......... 

Age 217,200 1,468 2 200 2 2,460 3 $1,104 

Disability, age 65 and over 37,200 1,351 ......... ......... ......... 

Disability, under age 65 44,000 1,822 600 2,092 

Spouses and divorced spouses 152,000 565 900 548 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 168,400 932 700 1,270 

Widowed mothers and fathers 1,100 1,210 4/ 836 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 15,100 625 100 633 

Children 13,100 730 100 960 

Other survivors 100 609 ......... ......... ......... 

5/ / 

574 598 

831 707 

......... 

616 640 

816 877 

431 322 

$877 

......... 

......... 

......... 

Monthly benefits 

Being Paid Awarded 

Average under 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded in 

month 

Social Security 

April 2002 

5

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

Benefit payments 

April April 

2002 2001 Number Average 

$5,464,000 $5,707,000 129,500 $42 200 $40 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Number Average 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement.

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 34); some 800

other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis.

4

Fewer than 50.

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers.

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.

Regular retirement and survivor benefit payments total includes hospital insurance benefits for services in Canada.

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

April 2002 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Unemployment 6,000 $247.40 

Sickness 6,900 248.10 

Unemployment 

Sickness 3,478,000 3,923,000 

4,504,000 3,992,000 

Benefit payments 

April 2001 

Total $7,981,000 $7,915,000 

432.92 

April 2002 

Per 

full week 

$424.47 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period 

Average payment 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. 

Recycled 

Paper 

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary and the Office of Public Affairs
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# Time and Date:

10 a.m. (EST) February 4, 2009.

# Place:

4th Floor, Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# Status:

Open.

# Matters To Be Considered:

1. Approval of the minutes of the June 30, 2008 ETAC meeting.

2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director.

3. Potential Legislative items:

 a. Automatic enrollment.

 b. L Fund default.

 c. Roth feature.

 d. Mutual fund window.

 e. Immediate employer contributions.

 f. Surviving spouse accounts.

 g. Administrative subpoena authority.

4. RMD suspension for 2009.

5. 2008 TSP Participant Survey results.

6. Agency review of the latest REIT industry proposal.

7. L Fund allocations.

8. New Business.

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Thomas K. Emswiler, Committee Management Officer, (202) 942-1660.

Dated: January 16, 2009.

Thomas K. Emswiler,

General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

 [FR Doc. E9-1557 Filed 1-21-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
# table61_q9_naics
m MES011ta =ME NSt 

genuine issue of material fact remains in dispute and that the moving 

party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id. To withstand 

summary judgment, the nonmoving party cannot rely solely on general 

allegations and conclusions set forth in the pleadings, but must instead 

present specific facts demonstrating the existence of a genuine factual 

issue supporting her claims. NRCP 56(e); see also Wood, 121 Nev. at 731, 

121 P.3d at 1030-31. 

Having reviewed appellant's proper person appeal statement 

and the record on appeal, we conclude that the district court properly 

awarded summary judgment in favor of respondent. Appellant failed to 

present any specific facts or evidence demonstrating the existence of a 

genuine issue of material fact supporting her claims against respondent. 

Id. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

L.P-tuk-A 

Hardesty 

Parraguirre 

cc: Hon. Jessie Elizabeth Walsh, District Judge 

George T. Bochanis, Short Trial Judge 

Judith Scrase 

Valarie I. Fujii & Associates 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00687-CV

Rudy NEIRA,

Appellant

v.

Sheryl SCULLY, In Her Official Capacity as the City Manager of the City of San Antonio, on 

Behalf of the San Antonio Planning Commission,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-05034

Honorable John D. Gabriel Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. 

We order that appellee Sheryl Scully, In Her Official Capacity as the City Manager of the 

City of San Antonio, on Behalf of the San Antonio Planning Commission, recover her costs of this 

appeal, if any, from appellant Rudy Neira. 

SIGNED July 22, 2015.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice