T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). N V / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MAT E O A R I KO L I MAI NA KA VI KA V O L A V O L A ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 72731 A ge nc yN os . A 075- 723- 402

A 078- 112- 136 A 078- 112- 137 A 078- 112- 138 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry16, 2010 ** B ef ore: F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , and M . S M IT H , C i rc ui tJudg es M a t e o A r i kol i M a i na ka vi kaV ol a vol a , hi s w i f e , a nd c hi l dr e n pe t i t i on f or re v iew o f th e B o ar do f I m m ig ra ti o n A p p ea ls’ (“B IA ”) o rd erd en yin g V o lav o la’s m o tio n to r e o p e n r e m o v a l p r o c e e d in g s . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 

# FI LED FEB 25 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSN V / Res ea r ch 07- 72731 2 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f

o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , se e I tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 321 F . 3d 889, 894 ( 9th C i r . 2003) , a nd w e de nythe pe t i t i on f or r e v i e w. W e r e je c t V o la v o la ’s c o n te n tio n th a t th e B I A e rr e db yf a ilin g to a c k n o w le d g e o rw e ig h e v id e n c e s ub m itte dw ith th e m o tio n to r e o p e n . See Ferna ndezv. G on zales , 43 9 F . 3d 59 2, 60 3 (9th C i r. 20 06 ). T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng V ol avol a’ s m ot i on t o reopen b a s e do n c h a n g e dc ir c u m s tan c e s b e c au s e h e f a ile dto e s tab lis h th e 2 0 0 6 c o up in Fi j i r e s u l t e di n ma t e r i a l c h a n g e s th a tw a rr a n tr e o p e n i n g o rth a th e i s n o w p r i ma f a c ie e lig ib le f

o ra s y lu m . See M

a ltyv . A s h c r o

ft , 381 F . 3d 942, 945 ( 9th C i r . 2004) (“ T h e cri t i cal q u est i o n i s. . . w h eth er ci rcu m st an ces h av e ch an g edsu ffi ci en t l y so thata pet i t i on erw ho previ ou sl y di d n othave a l egi t i m at e c l ai m for a sy l um no w has aw e ll- f o u n d e df e a ro f f u tu r e p e r s e c u tio n .” ) . W e de c l i ne t o c ons i de rV ol a vol a ’ s c ha l l e nge t o the B I A ’ s A pr i l 20, 2005 or de rde ny i ng a s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C on vent i on A gai nstT orture because the cont ent i on s have a l re ady bee n con si dere d a n dr e je c te db yth is c o u rt. V

olavola v. G on zales , 22 5 F ed. A pp x. 55 9 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 7 ) ; se e al

so Merri t t

v. M acke y , 932 F . 2d 1317, 1320 ( 9th C i r . 1991) ( e xpl a i ni ng tha tunde rthe ‘ l a w of

the c a s e doc tr i ne , ’ one pa ne l of a n appe l l a t e c ourtw i l l notN V / Res ea r ch 07- 72731 3 r e c o n s i d e rq u e s t i o n s w h i c h a n o th e rp a n e l h a s d e c i d e do n ap r i o rap p e a l i n th e s a me ca se ). F i nal l y, because the B IA corr ec t l y f ou nd i n i t s A pri l 20 , 20 05 order that V ol a vol aha d notde m ons tr a t e d pa s tpe r s e c ut i on, the B I A di d note rrbynot a d d r e s s in g V o la v o la ’s h u m a n itar ian a s y lu m c la im in th e m o tio n to r e o p e n . 8 C .F .R . § 1 2 0 8 .1 3 ( b ) ( 1 ) ( iii) ; se e al so H an na v. Keisler , 5 0 6 F .3 d9 3 3 , 9 3 9 ( 9 th C i r. 20 07 ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.