alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|    |                                                                                                                            |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                          |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |

|                                       |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                       |  |
| /s/ Matthew A. Ouimet                 |   |
| Matthew A. Ouimet                     |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                  |   |
| /s/ Brian C. Witherow                 |   |
| Brian C. Witherow                     |   |
| Executive Vice President and          |   |
| Chief Financial Officer               |   |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Chaymarl Cormier, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 468]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 28, 2002 *(People v Cormier,*294 AD2d 593 [2002]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 13, 1999.

Ordered that the application is . denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, PJ., Florio, Adams and Santucci, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Annabelle Zaratzian, Appellant, v Adel Ramsey Abadir, Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Adel Ramsey Abadir, Respondent, v Annabelle Zaratzian, Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

Submitted July 1, 2013;

decided August 29, 2013

Motion by the Women’s Bar Association of the State of New York for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the brief is accepted as filed.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0806. MANUEL LOZANO v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON et

al.

Manuel Lozano filed a complaintseeking a declaratory judgment pertaining to

real property. Along with the complaint, Lozano filed, pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-65

(b), a “Motion for an Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order and for an Interlocutory

Injunction,” seeking to maintain the status quo with regard to the property. The trial

court denied the motion without a hearing. On October 5, 2017, the defendants

removed the case to federal court. On October 9, 2017, Lozano filed a notice of

appeal seeking to appeal the order denying his request for a temporary restraining

order. Two of the defendants have filed a motion to dismiss Lozano’s appeal.

Pretermitting whether the trial court lost jurisdiction upon removal to the

federal court, the trial court’s order denies a request of a temporary restraining order. 

Consequently, Lozano was required to file an application for discretionary appeal to

obtain appellate review. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (9). See also Dolinger v. Driver,

269 Ga. 141, 142 (1) (498 SE2d 252) (1998). Lozano’s failure to follow the proper

appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal. Thus, the

defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

January 11, 2018
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

01/11/2018
#### ROMAN v. GREAT AMERICAN INDEMNITY CO.

Civ. No. 5127.

United States District Court D. Puerto Rico. San Juan Division.

May 11, 1949.

*50David Curet Cuevas, of San Juan, Puerto Rico, for .plaintiff.

Francis & Ydrach, of San Juan, Puerto Rico, for defendant.

CHAVEZ, District Judge.

The Court is going to overrule the objection of the plaintiff to the evidence tending to prove that Juan Roman Vargas .failed to pay the premium prior to the death of the insured. This evidence is admitted under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 12(b), 28 U.S.C.A., and the Court is going to consider and treat the first defense of the answer as one for summary judgment. Moore’s Federal Practice, Vol. 2, pp. 1698-1699.

The Court takes this position in. view of the fact that under the new rules it is left to the discretion of the trial- court whether or not to receive matters outside the pleading on motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. And for the further reason that if the trial judge is disinclined to receive extrinsic matters on the motion to dismiss such matter may be presented to ■him by labeling the motion as one for summary judgment. 'The Court takes it for granted that if it was inclined not to receive extrinsic matters on the motion to dismiss that the defendant would immediately file a motion for summary judgment.

The Court in this case may be confronted with a situation wherein there is no genuine issue of material fact as -to the matters alleged in the complaint and/or upon defendant’s motion which will be treated as a motion for summary judgment. Therefore, the Court directs both counsels’ attention -to the following:

> “If either the proponent of a claim or the defending party moves for a summary judgment, and the court finds that the moving party is not entitled thereto, but that the other party is so entitled, it would seem that the court has the power to enter the proper judgment, although a cross-motion therefor was not made. As the rule does not expressly cover this point a cross-motion for summary judgment would be advisable.”

The Court will give the parties 10 days within which to file any further pleadings in the case and thereafter will set this matter down for an early hearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          28,374
<SECURITIES>                                     9,504
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,089
<ALLOWANCES>                                       533
<INVENTORY>                                        722
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,336
<PP&E>                                           4,362
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,811
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,971
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,156
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,811
<SALES>                                         24,328
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,439
<CGS>                                            5,890
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,895
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,046
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,086
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,960
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,960
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   $ 0.70<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $ 0.63<F1>
<FN>
<F1>INFORMATION HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO.128. BASIC AND DILUTED
EPS HAVE BEEN REPORTED IN PLACE OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop #1621 Washington, DC 20240 Tel: 202.632.7003 Fax: 202.632.7066 WWW.NIGC.GOV

REGIONAL OFFICES Portland, OR; Sacramento, CA; Phoenix, AZ; St. Paul, MN; Tulsa, OK; Oklahoma City, OK

August 27, 2021

Peter Yucupicio, Chairman

Pasqua Yaqui Tribe

7471 S. Camino De Oeste

Tuscon, AZ 85757

 

Re: Gaming Ordinance Amendments of 2021

Dear Chairman Yucupicio:

On behalf of the Pasqua Yaqui Tribe, you requested the National Indian Gaming 

Commission review and approve the Tribe’s Gaming Ordinance Amendments of 2021. The 

Tribal Council adopted this Ordinance by Resolution No. CO 8-233-21 on August 11, 2021.

I approve the Gaming Ordinance Amendments of 2021 as consistent with the IGRA and 

NIGC regulatory requirements. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact 

Maria Getoff, Senior Attorney, at maria_getoff@nigc.gov.

Sincerely,

E. Sequoyah Simermeyer

Chairman

cc: Amanda Sampson, General Counsel, Casino del Sol
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q of Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 26, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard L. Markee, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 12, 2009



/s/ Richard L. MarkeeRichard L. MarkeeChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and is not being filed as part of this Report.
99.2        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Flanigan"s Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended September 28, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward
A. Doxey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 06 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that
to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Edward A. Doxey
                                                ----------------------
                                                Name: Edward A. Doxey
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                Date: December 27, 2002
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00259-CR

Jacob Thomas Layton

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

105th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13-CRF-0097-1

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 16, 2015
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMES A. PERKOWSKI,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1954

[September 12, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Edward H. Merrigan, 

Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 89-8952 CF10A.

James A. Perkowski, Avon Park, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of  personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Human Genome Research Institute Special Emphasis Panel, RC2 Sequencing Technology.                    

*Date:*                         July 27, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Washington Plaza Hotel, 10 Thomas Circle, NW., Washington, DC 20005.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ken D. Nakamura, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, MSC 9306, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-402-0838,                         *nakamurk@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 24, 2009.

Anna Snouffer,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-15568 Filed 6-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
|   Name      of Subsidiary                                                                            |   |  Jurisdictionof Incorporation |   | YearAcquiredof Formed |   | Percentageof      VotingSecurities Owned |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
| ASI      Data Services Inc                                                                                |   | Maine                         |   | 1993             |   | 100%                                |
| Northeast      Savings Bank, F.S.B. (and its 100% owned subsidiary, Northeast Bank      Insurance Group, Inc.) |   | Maine                              |   | 1987                  |   | 100%                                     |
RRB News www.rrb.gov 

877-772-5772 general information U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Public Affairs 

844 North Rush Street Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092 312-751-4777 media inquiries 

No. 15-1 For Immediate Release 

 January 2015 

RRB Management Member Appoints Marx as Assistant 

Natasha Marx has been named as a staff assistant by the Management Member of the 

U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB), Steven J. Anthony. At the time of her appointment, 

Ms. Marx was an auditor in the agency’s Office of Inspector General (OIG). 

In her new position, Ms. Marx will advise and assist the Management Member in reviewing 

fiscal and policy matters, information technology initiatives and legislative proposals related to 

administration of the RRB and its benefits programs. 

Before joining the OIG in 2008, she worked at Sears Holdings Corporation where she managed 

multimillion-dollar projects and process improvement initiatives. 

A native of Chicago, Ms. Marx is a graduate of Northern Illinois University (B.S. 2001, M.B.A. 

2006). She is also a Certified Internal Auditor and holds a master’s certificate in project management 

from George Washington University. 

Ms. Marx currently resides in the northwest suburbs of Chicago with her husband and two 

children. 

# # # 

An independent Federal agency headquartered in Chicago, the RRB pays nearly $11.9 billion a 

year in benefits under the Federal Railroad Retirement and Unemployment Insurance Acts to the 

nation’s railroad workers and their families.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, David Gorodyansky, the Chief Financial Officer of INTELLIGENT BUYING. INC.  (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 15th day of August 2011.





/s/ David GorodyanskyDavid GorodyanskyPrincipal Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Intelligent Buying, Inc. and will be retained by Intelligent Buying, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

VICTOR MANUEL GALLEGOS,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

 State.

 

§

§

§

 

§

§

§ 

 

§

'

'

No. 08-14-00276-CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 7

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20120C01670)

 O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief until 

September 3, 2015. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE 

STATE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime Esparza, the State’s Attorney, prepare the 

State’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before September 3, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 21

st day of July, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, CJ, Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mashon Baines, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 869]

*433Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Michael Gross, J.), rendered October 28, 2011, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of harassment in the second degree, and sentencing her to conditional discharge for a period of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, including its evaluation of a series of surveillance photographs. We find that the photos do not contradict the victim’s testimony; instead, they tend to corroborate it to the extent they support an inference that defendant pushed the victim and knocked her to the floor. Concur — Sweeny, J.E, Moskowitz, DeGrasse and Gische, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Quentin T. Kelly certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the AnnualReport of WorldWater & Power Corp. on Form 10-KSB for the annualperiod ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents inall material respects the financial condition and results of operation ofWorldWater & Power Corp.

| By:    |   | s/ QUENTIN T. KELLY   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------|
| NAME:  |   | QUENTIN T. KELLY      |
| Title: |   | Chairman of the Board |

 

Dated: April 14, 2006

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-KSBpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, orthe Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specificallyincorporates it by reference.

----