alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
 
Parent of Bay State Gas Company -- None
 
Subsidiaries of Registrant -- Northern Utilities, Inc.
                           -- Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc.
 
Subsidiaries of Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc. -- Bay State Energy
                                                     Development, Inc.
                                                     -- Natural Gas Development
                                                     Corp.
                                                     -- Bay State Energy
                                                     Enterprises, Inc.
                                                     -- EnergyUSA, Inc.
                                                     -- LNG Development, Corp.
 
     Each subsidiary is wholly owned. Northern Utilities, Inc. and Granite State
Gas Transmission, Inc. are incorporated in the State of New Hampshire. Bay State
Energy Development, Inc., Bay State Energy Enterprises, Inc., and EnergyUSA,
Inc. (formerly Energy Asset Funding, Inc.), and LNG Development, Corp. are
incorporated in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Natural Gas Development,
Corp. is incorporated in the State of Maine.
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - July 2007 

Benefit payments July 2007 July 2006 

Regular Retirement 

and Survivor Benefits 

Total 

Retired employ

Spouses and d

Widow(er)s - ag

Other survivors 

ees 

ivorced spouses 

ed and disabled 

23,014,000 

97,724,000 

157,151,000 

$814,613,000 

536,724,000 

22,818,000 

93,839,000 

157,572,000 

$792,922,000 

518,693,000 

Average under 

Being paid Awarded in Social Security 

Monthly benefits end of month month July 2007 

Number Average1 Number Average1 Being Paid Awarded 

Total 575,800 ......... 2,900 ......... ......... .........

Regular employee annuities, total 277,600 $1,916 1,400 $2,544 ......... .........

 Age 193,200 1,880 2 800 2 2,938 $1,051 3 $1,436

 Disability, Full Retirement Age and Over 34,300 1,708 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Disability, Under Full Retirement Age 50,000 2,199 300 2,382 979 1,031 

Spouses and divorced spouses 137,200 705 900 870 504 371 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 134,600 1,162 500 1,589 995 827 

Widowed mothers and fathers 900 1,464 4/ 1,340 760 751 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 14,400 775 100 930 5/ 5/ 

Children 11,100 851 4/ 1,152 686 667 

Other survivors 4/ 842 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Benefit payments 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

July 

2007 

$5,049,000 

July 

2006 

$5,075,000 

Number 

121,000 

Average 

$42 800 

Number 

$42 

Average 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement. 

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 35); some 300

 other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis. 

4

Fewer than 50. 

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers. 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. 

Regular retirement and survivor benefit payments total includes hospital insurance benefits for services in Canada. 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

July 2007 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Average payment 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period

 Per

 full week 

Unemployment 2,200 $486 $285 

Sickness 5,400 

July 2007 

499 

Benefit payments 

286 

July 2006 

Unemployment

Total 

3,136,000 

$5,499,000 $6,182,000 

2,154,000 

Sickness 2,363,000 4,027,000 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited). Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary 

Recycled

 Paper
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate recor d, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argumentwould not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. Se eFed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1 (G). The cause is therefore ordered s ubmitted without oral argument. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### NOV 10 1999 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
JIMMY GENE WELCH, Petitioner - Appellant, vs. RON CHAMPION, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. No. 99-7070 (D.C. No. 98-CV-480) (E.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before ANDERSON , KELLY , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges. **
Mr. Welch, an inmate appearing pro se, seeks to appeal from th e district court’s dismissal of his habeas petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Although Mr. Welch did not exhaust his claims, the district court dete rmined that requiring exhaustion would be futile and that the petition should be den ied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(2) because it raised state law issues.- 2 -

Mr. Welch claims that his sentence, imposed prior to passage of the Oklahoma Truth in Sentencing Act, should be adjuste d downward. He claims that the Act has disadvantaged him because he wouldreceive a lighter sentence under the sentencing matrix established by the Act. He claims an equal protection violation because he is punished differe ntly from those convicted after passage of the Act. “In conducting habeas review, a federal court is li mited to deciding whether a conviction violated the Constitution, law s, or treaties of the United States.” Estelle v. McGuire , 502 U.S. 62, 68 (1991). Whether the Act should b e applied retroactively is a question of state law, n ot one of Constitutional dimension. “‘[T]here is absolutely no constitution al authority for the proposition that the perpetrator of a crime can claim the benef it of a later enacted statute which lessens the culpability level of that crime after it was committed.’” Nestell v. Klinger , No. 98-6148, 1998 WL 544361 at *1 (10th Cir. Aug. 27, 1998) (unpublished) (quoting United States v. Haines , 855 F.2d 199, 200 (5th Cir. 1988).We DENY Mr. Welch’s application for a certificate o f appealability and

dismiss the appeal.- 3 - Entered for the Court Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

# AGENCY:

Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces a change in benefit period eligibility under the EB program for Florida.

The following change has occurred since the publication of the last notice regarding Florida's EB status:
      - Florida has modified its law by adding a total unemployment rate (TUR) trigger retroactive to February 1, 2009. As a result, Florida has retroactively triggered “on” to a high unemployment period (HUP) for weeks of unemployment beginning February 22, 2009, and eligible unemployed workers will be able to collect up to an additional 20 weeks of unemployment insurance benefits.

## Information for Claimants

The duration of benefits payable in the EB program, and the terms and conditions on which they are payable, are governed by the Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, as amended, and the operating instructions issued to the states by the U.S. Department of Labor. In the case of a state beginning an HUP, the State Workforce Agency will furnish a written notice of potential entitlement to each individual who has exhausted all rights to regular benefits and is potentially eligible for EB (20 CFR 615.13(c)(1)). Persons who believe they may be entitled to EB or who wish to inquire about their rights under the program should contact their State Workforce Agency.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Scott Gibbons, U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Workforce Security, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Frances Perkins Building, Room S-4231, Washington, DC 20210, telephone number (202) 693-3008 (this is not a toll-free number) or by e-mail:                         *gibbons.scott@dol.gov.*

Signed in Washington, DC, this 19th day of June 2009.

Douglas F. Small,

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9-15166 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P
@misc{108856,
  author = {John Messina and James St},
  title = {From Databooks to Online Dictionaries and Parts Catalogues},
  year = {2004},
  month = {2004-01-05},
  publisher = {NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=31529},
  language = {en},
}
1

Program

Letter

 United States

 Railroad Retirement Board

 Office of Programs

 

Quality Reporting Service Center

Email: QRSC@rrb.gov 

Phone: (312) 751-4992

 Fax: (312) 751-7123

Letter No. 2021-04 Date: 04/14/2021

 

TO: Prepayment Claims Verification (RUIA) Contact Officials

SUBJECT: Reporting Earnings on Forms ID-4K, Prepayment Notice of Employees’ 

Applications and Claims for Benefits under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA)

Please share this information with the appropriate members of your staff who handle Forms

ID-4K, Prepayment Notice of Employees’ Applications and Claims for Benefits under the 

RUIA for employees of your organization.

The Form ID-4K, Prepayment Notice of Employees’ Applications and Claims for Benefits under 

the RUIA is a notification sent by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) to the employers 

when an employee files an application for unemployment benefits, unemployment claim, or 

sickness claim. The notification contains information as reported by the employee on his or her 

application or claim for benefits. 

The notices request employers to report to the RRB information which may affect a claimant's 

eligibility for benefits, such as receiving wages, vacation pay, and holiday pay or because they 

were absent. In addition, for unemployment claims only, the RRB requests information from 

employers about earnings paid to employees in the registration period. Based on RRB regulations, 

unemployment benefits are not payable if earnings for the registration period exceed the monthly 

compensation base for the employee's base year.

Employers are to report the total (GROSS) earnings, both remuneration and potential earnings,

received by the employee during the applicable claim period. Earnings are defined as 

"remuneration" in section 1(j) of the RUIA. In general, remuneration comprises of wages, vacation 

pay, holiday pay, pay for time lost, etc. Income from other sources, e.g. investments and pensions, 

is not remuneration. In addition, employers should report the amount of GROSS earnings the 

employee would have been paid but did not receive because he or she was not ready or willing to 

perform suitable work available to him or her.

The sections on the Forms ID-4K where the employers should report the GROSS earnings are the

“Payments” section on the ERSNet version and the “Earnings” section on the paper forms. The 

Payments section on the ERSNet version states “For unemployment claims, if employee was paid 

or will have been paid, show total (GROSS) payment for above period, including Potential
2

Earnings”. All employers are to provide the GROSS earnings on either the paper or electronic 

version of the notice when reporting this information to the RRB.

Questions

If you have any additional questions concerning the completion of Forms ID-4K, please contact 

your local RRB field office via the toll free number (877) 772-5772.

###
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 125 (Wednesday, July 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15560]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5300-N-27]


Notice of Availability: Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for 
Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Tribal Colleges and Universities Program

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and 
Research, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Through this notice, HUD announces the availability on its Web 
site of the application information, submission deadlines, funding 
criteria, and other requirements for the FY2009 Tribal Colleges and 
Universities Program NOFA. This NOFA makes approximately $5 million 
available to assist Tribal Colleges and Universities (TCU) to build, 
expand, renovate, and equip their own facilities, and to expand the 
role of the TCUs into the community through the provision of needed 
services such as health programs, job training, and economic 
development activities. The notice providing information regarding the 
application process, funding criteria and eligibility requirements is 
available on the HUD Web site at http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning the Tribal 
Colleges and Universities Program, contact Sherone Ivey, Office of 
University Partnerships, Office of Policy Development and Research, 
Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., 
Room 8226, Washington DC 20410; telephone 202-402-4200 (this is not a 
toll-free number). Persons with speech or hearing impairments may 
access this telephone number via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal 
Information Relay Service during working hours at 800-877-8339.

    Dated: June 9, 2009.
Jean Lin Pao,
General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research.
[FR Doc. E9-15560 Filed 6-26-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Form 10-Q of Funtalk China Holdings Limited (the “Company”)
for the three months period ended June 30, 2009, as amended, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kim
Chuan (“Jackie”) Leong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period
certified.




/s/
      Kim Chuan (“Jackie”) LeongKim
      Chuan (“Jackie”) LeongChief
      Financial Officer




December 10,
2009
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 10, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 10, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0226. CHADWICK HART v. DORANNE SATTERLEE et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

12FV0833
# Field Descriptions

# 2014 Nonprofit Data
@misc{1212456,
  author = {Ashley Boggs-Russell and Kerrianne Buchanan and David W. Griffith and Heather Evans and Dimitrios Meritis and Lisa Ng and Anna Sberegaeva and Michelle Stephens},
  title = {National Institute of Standards and Technology Environmental Scan 2023: Societal and Technology Landscape to Inform Science and Technology Research},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-08-23 04:08:00},
  publisher = {NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936938},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8482},
  language = {en},
}
#### Salvatore Guerrera, Respondent, v Robert J. Zysk, Appellant.

Submitted February 11, 2013;

decided March 26, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6486

THOMAS D. CARR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SPRING GROVE HOSPITAL CENTER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA96-1328-DKC)

Submitted: June 12, 1997 Decided: June 18, 1997

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas D. Carr, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Renee Steinberg, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carr

v. Spring Grove Hosp. Ctr., No. CA-96-1328-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 14,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 22, 2015

No. 04-15-00347-CV

Chris RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant

v.

U.S. Home Ownership LLC,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CI01511

Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, appellee’s motion to 

dismiss this appeal is GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF 

JURISDICTION. 

It is so ORDERED on July 22, 2015.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of July, 2015.

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kevin Hogge, Chief Financial Officer of CRC Health Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2010                                            
|                                                              
|/S/    KEVIN
HOGGE                                            
|Kevin Hogge                                                   
|Chief Financial Officer                                       
|(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CRC Health Corporation and will be retained
by CRC Health Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.