alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-15-00202-CV

____________________

JEREMIAH DEMARCUS KELLY, Appellant

V.

LISA CHAPMAN, Appellee

_________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 58th District Court 

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. A-194,035 

_________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

The appellant, Jeremiah Demarcus Kelly, filed a motion to dismiss this 

appeal. In his motion, Kelly states that the parties have reached an agreement to 

settle and compromise their differences and appellant no longer desires to appeal 

the trial court’s judgment. Appellant further states that costs on appeal should be 

taxed against the Appellant. No other party filed a notice of appeal. Appellant has 

complied with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1). 
2

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. We tax costs on appeal against 

the appellant.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

 

________________________________

 LEANNE JOHNSON

 Justice

 

Submitted on July 15, 2015

Opinion Delivered July 16, 2015

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Middle Kingdom Alliance Corp. (the Company) on Form 10Q, for the three
month period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Fred A. Brasch, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Fred A. Brasch     
|Fred A. Brasch         
|Chief Financial Officer

August 10, 2007
#### In the Matter of Manny P., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 50]

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan R Larabee, J.), entered on or about April 12, 2005, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the second and third degrees and obstructing governmental administration in the second degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the finding as to assault in the third degree and dismissing that count of the petition, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The evidence established that appellant intentionally injured a school employee on school grounds (Penal Law § 120.05 [10] [a]) and obstructed governmental administration (Penal Law § 195.05). The victim, a teacher, was performing the official function of allowing his students to enter his classroom and concomitantly excluding those who did not belong there, when he denied admittance to appellant, who thereafter cursed the teacher, assumed a boxing stance, and punched the teacher, who was attempting to shut the classroom door. The element of physical injury was established by evidence that the teacher suffered severe pain, for which he sought medical attention and was prescribed a painkiller *(see People v Guidice,*83 NY2d 630, 636 [1994]). However, the third-degree assault charge should have been dismissed as a lesser included offense. Concur—Saxe, J.E, Friedman, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
Exhibit 23.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of SterlingFinancial Corporation of our reports dated March 15, 2007, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Sterling Financial Corporation, Sterling Financial Corporation management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting of Sterling Financial Corporation, included in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006:(1) Registration Statement (Form S-3/A No. 33-55131) pertaining to theSterling Financial Corporation Dividend Reinvestment and StockPurchase Plan; (2) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-28101) pertaining to the 1997Directors Stock Compensation Plan and Policy; (3) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-103069), pertaining to theSterling Financial Corporation 1996 Stock Incentive Plan; (4) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-126258), pertaining to theSterling Financial Corporation 2005 Directors Stock Compensation Planand Policy; and (5) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-138382), pertaining to theSterling Financial Corporation 2006 Equity Compensation Plan
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Christopher ALEXANDER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-10289

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 5, 2012.

Katherine Ann Miller, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Christopher Alexander, Florence, CO, pro se.

Before BENAVIDES, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Christopher Alexander, federal prisoner #25906-177, appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 8582(c)(2) motion for a sentencing reduction based upon Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines. He argues that: (1) the district court could have lowered his sentence because Amendment 750 altered his base offense level; (2) the district court failed to mention the specific circumstances that led it to decline to exercise its discretion to lower his sentence; and (3) the Government’s assertion that he was responsible for 4.11 kilograms of crack cocaine is erroneous.

A district court may grant a § 3582(c)(2) motion only “in the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission.” § 3582(c)(2). This court reviews a district court’s decision “whether to reduce a sentence pursuant to ... § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion, ... its interpretation of the Guidelines de novo, and its findings of fact for clear error.” *United States v. Henderson,*636 F.3d 713, 717 (5th Cir.2011) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). “A district court abuses its discretion if it bases its decision on an error of law or a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence.” *Id.*(citation omitted).

Alexander’s original guidelines range of imprisonment was 360 months to life. Applying Amendment 750, his guidelines range of imprisonment is still 360 months to life. *See*U.S.S.G. Ch. '5, Pt. A. Therefore, the district court did not err in concluding that Alexander was ineligible for a sentence reduction and did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion.

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ William J. HoranWilliam J. Horan, Chairman, President and Director(Principal Executive Officer)Dated:  May 14, 2010
Exhibit 31.1

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Brian Pratt, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 of Primoris Services Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
May 13, 2009

/s/ BRIAN
PRATT
Brian Pratt Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President

---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6396

EDGAR SEARCY, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden, F.C.C. Petersburg, Virginia, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00050-REP)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 5, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edgar Searcy, Appellant Pro Se. Robert P. McIntosh, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Edgar Searcy, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Searcy v. Stansberry , No. 3:08-cv-00050- REP (E.D. Va. Feb. 19, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification**I, Teresa L. Martin, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FGBC Bancshares, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designated such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) [Omitted];     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: May 11, 2007                /s/ Teresa L. Martin Teresa L. Martin
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 127 (Monday, July 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15753]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,552]


Meridian Automotive Systems, 6701 Statesville Boulevard, 
Salisbury, North Carolina; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on May 22, 2009 in response to a worker 
petition filed by a North Carolina State Agency Representative on 
behalf of workers of Meridian Automotive Systems, Salisbury, North 
Carolina.
    The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition 
(TA-W-70,529) filed on May 26, 2009 that is the subject of an ongoing 
investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of June 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-15753 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Real Estate Referral Center Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Lisa McIntosh, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   

Dated this 10th day of January, 2008.

LISA MCINTOSHLisa McIntoshChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

















---
Exhibit
32.1






Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Green Irons Holdings Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Sandy
McDougall, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President,
Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, and a member of the Board of
Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and








(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Green Irons Holdings Corp., and will be retained by Green Irons Holdings Corp.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.






Dated
this 12th day of September 2008.




/s/
      Sandy McDougallSandy
      McDougallChief
      Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
              President,
      Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, and a member of the
      Board of Directors


10
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LESTER JAMAL JOHNSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 336 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of December, 2016

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 936 

Supporting the designation of April 19–25, 2020, as National Crime Victims’ 

Rights Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2020 

Mr. COSTA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of April 19–25, 2020, as National 

Crime Victims’ Rights Week. 

Whereas crime and victimization in the United States have 

significant, often devastating impacts on victims, survivors, and communities large and small; 

Whereas, in 2018, there were 3.3 million violent victimizations, yet only 43 percent of these crimes were reported 

to police, and only 11 percent of violent victim crime victims accessed assistance from a victim service agency; 

Whereas crime victims and survivors need and deserve support and access to services to help them cope with the 

physical, psychological, financial, social, and spiritual impact of crime; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 936 IH 

Whereas Congress recognizes the vital needs of crime victims 

and survivors through the enactment of responsive law 

and continued financial support of victim service agencies 

through the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA), the Violence 

Against Women Act (VAWA), and the Family Violence 

Prevention and Services Act (FVPSA), among others; 

Whereas the mission of the Congressional Crime Survivors 

and Justice Caucus is to identify, address, and elevate 

the needs of crime survivors and all United States jurisdictions affected by crime in a bipartisan manner, without infringing on the rights of the accused, through Federal legislation, Congressional education, public awareness, and collaboration with allied professionals and organizations nationwide; and 

Whereas the Caucus and the Congress commit to the adoption of policies and programs that identify and meet the 

needs of crime survivors across the United States: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) strongly supports the goals and theme of 

3 2020 National Crime Victims’ Rights Week—‘‘Seek 

4 Justice, Ensure Victims’ Rights, Inspire Hope’’; 

5 (2) recognizes the outstanding efforts of over 

6 10,000 victim assistance organizations and agencies 

7 that serve survivors at the local, State, Tribal, na8 tional, and Federal levels; 

9 (3) remains committed to supporting and sus10 taining the Victims of Crime Act that helps over 

11 6,800 public, community-based, and Tribal victim 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 936 IH 

1 and/or survivor assistance organizations and agen2 cies that provide essential, often life-saving services 

3 to millions of crime victims throughout the United 

4 States; and 

5 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

6 to observe 2020 National Crime Victims’ Rights 

7 Week with appropriate public awareness, education, 

8 and outreach activities. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
e-mail: qrsc@rrb.gov Fax: (312) 751-7190 

Letter No. 2021-02 Date: January 4, 2021 

TO: Certification Registration, Retirement and Unemployment Contact Officials 

SUBJECT: Impact of Removal of Sequestration under the Continued Assistance to Rail Workers 

Act of 2020 on RUIA Benefits effective January 3, 2021 

Please distribute this notice to all individuals within your organization who may need the 

information in connection with their work. 

Unemployment and sickness benefits payable under the Railroad Unemployment 

Insurance Act (RUIA) for days claimed beginning January 3, 2021 will be exempt from 

sequestration until 30 days after the Presidential declaration of a national emergency 

concerning COVID-19 terminates in accordance with the Continued Assistance to Rail 

Workers Act of 2020 (CARWA). 

Beginning January 3, 2021, the unreduced amount of sickness or unemployment benefits 

paid to a claimant will be charged to the claimant’s base year employer’s benefit account 

balance and consequently will be used when calculating the base year employer’s 

experience rated RUIA contribution rate for any future years. 

Any special extended unemployment benefits as well as unemployment and sickness 

benefits now allowed due to the elimination of the 1-week waiting period under CARWA 

will be charged to funds previously appropriated under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and 

Economic Security Act, or CARES Act. These benefits will not be charged to the 

claimant’s base year employer’s benefit account balance and consequently will not be 

used when calculating the base year employer’s experience rated RUIA contribution rate 

for any future years. 

The removal of sequestration is a temporary measure. We will provide more information 

at such time when we are instructed to reinstate this provision of the Balanced Budget 

and Emergency Deficit Control Act, as amended. 

If you have any questions regarding the removal of sequestration on benefits paid based 

on the Continued Assistance to Rail Workers Act of 2020, please contact the Railroad 

Retirement Board’s Quality Reporting Service Center at (312) 751-4992.