alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11789 and #11790]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
                        ( print page 30649)
                        disaster for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1842-DR), dated 06/19/2009. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Flooding, and Straight-line Winds. *Incident Period:*
                         05/06/2009 through 05/08/2009.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         06/19/2009. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         08/18/2009. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/19/2010.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 06/19/2009, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*
                     Autauga, Elmore, Montgomery. *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):* Alabama: Bullock, Chilton, Coosa, Crenshaw, Dallas, Lowndes, Macon, Pike, Tallapoosa. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.875Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.437Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.500Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11789B and for economic injury is 117900.
 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E9-15105 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Program

Letter

 United States

 Railroad Retirement Board

 Office of Programs

 

Quality Reporting Service Center

Email: QRSC@rrb.gov 

Phone: (312) 751-4992

 Fax: (312) 751-7123

Letter No. 2012-04 Date: January 6, 2012

 [Revised: May 18, 2018] 

TO: Certification Contact Officials

SUBJECT: Medicare Taxes Withheld Shown in the “Other” Box (14) on Form W-2

Please share this information with the appropriate members of your staff who provide 

payroll services for employees of your organization.

The purpose of this letter is to provide you with the information about the new enhanced on-line

version of Form W-2 available through the Social Security Administration (SSA) website. The

new form allows employers covered under the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) to display the

amount of Medicare taxes withheld in the “Other” box (14) for their employees.

The Form W-2 is an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) form that is filed with SSA. The IRS receives 

this wage information from SSA for federal tax data purposes. Employers must file Form W-2 by 

the last day of February each year. SSA also provides employers with an automated process to 

submit the W-2 information through their Business Services Online (BSO) application which is 

available through their website.

In accordance with the SSA instructions for completion of Form W-2, RRA covered employers

can make no entries in boxes 3, 4, 5, and 6 of Form W-2 or in the corresponding boxes on Form

W-3. A common error is to enter Medicare tax withheld in the Medicare tax block. However, that 

Medicare box is for employees covered under the Social Security Act. Employers covered under 

the Railroad Retirement Tax Act must show the amount of Tier I and Tier II tax withheld in the 

“Other” box (14). In addition to the Tier I and Tier II tax withheld, you may include optional 

information such as Medicare tax withheld.

Based on information the Railroad Retirement Board obtained from our covered employers who

use the SSA online system to file their Forms W-2/W-3 we worked with the IRS and SSA to make 

changes to the on-line Form W-2. Previously our rail and labor employers could not use the online version to report Medicare tax in the “Other” box (14) because it would only accept two entries 

for the Tier I and Tier II tax withheld. Based on collaboration between the agencies, the IRS 

changed the on-line format to accept three entries which will allow RRA covered employers to 

now record the Medicare tax withheld. This change became effective with the December 5, 2011 

release of the W-2 Online software for Tax Year 2011 reporting in January 2012.
The Social Security Administration has provided a link to their Business Services Online Tutorial 

instructions to help employers register for and use their on-line system. This is a handy overall 

guide for anyone who wants to electronically file using W-2 Online.

https://www.ssa.gov/employer/documents/W2Online.pdf

If you have questions about this letter, please contact the Quality Reporting Service Center

(QRSC) at the telephone number or email address shown above.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Emilio Aviles, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 116]

Judgment, Supreme *546Court, Bronx County (Darcel Clark, J.), rendered on or about March 22, 2005, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Saxe, Marlow, Sullivan and Williams, JJ.
F ILED U.S. COURT O F APP EALS EL EV EN TH C IRC UIT Ja nua ry 4 , 2 007 T HOMA S K. KA HN CLERK [DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 06- 1370 1 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D.C. Dock etNos
. 06-001 34-CV- T- 30MSS 03 -BK-2 31 02 -ALP IN RE : AME RICA

N E QU IT Y C ORP ORA TI ONOF PIN EL LA S, D e b t o r .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ES TH ER GL AU SE R, PAUL C. ASTOR, Exec utor of the Estate of

Julius Gla

user, JULIUS GLAUSER, IRA,

Pl ai nti ff s- Appe llants , ve rs us V. JOHN BROOK, Tr ustee,
De fendant-Appellee.2 ____ ____ ____ ___ ____ _ ____ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court fo r the Mi ddl e D istri ct

of F lor ida

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ (January 4, 2007) Be fo re BL A CK , MA RC U S an d C O X , Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M: Appe llants E sth er

G lause r, P au l C
. A sto r, E xe cu tor of the e state of

Jul ius G lause r, a nd the Jul ius G lause r IR A ( co lle ct ive ly , “ the G lause rs ”) se ek r ev er sa l of the dis tr ic t c ourt’ s a ff

ir m an ce of a n or de r of

the bankr

upt cy c ourt a ppr ovi ng a
co m pr om ise in tw o a dve rs ar ia l pr oc ee din gs i nit ia te d by the Ch ap te r 7 T ru ste e of the E state of

A m er ic anE qui ty

Co rp or at ionof

P ine lla s ( “ the D eb tor ”) a ga ins t Ronald Clam

pitt, Gina C lam

pitt, and others. T he com prom ise wa s m ade betwe en the T ru ste e, Ro na ld C la m pitt ( w ho i s th e sol e share hol de r of the D eb tor ) an d G ina Clam pitt (Ronald Clam

pitt’s w ife). T he Glauser s are c reditors of the De btor. H av ing tho ro ughl y

r ev ie w ed the br ie fs a nd the r ec or d onappe al , w e hol d that the dis tr ic t c ourt e rr ed in af fi rm ing the bankr

upt cy c ourt be ca

use the bankrupt cy

court abused its di scretion in approvi ng the com prom ise. T he rec ord is n ot s uf fi ci en tly de ve lop ed

to supp ort a

f ind ing that the c om

pr om ise is in the be st in te res t o f th e es ta te .Appellee ' s motion for damag es and c osts is DENI ED. 1 3 T he re fo re , w e re ve rs e the dis tr ic t c ourt’ s or de r af fi rm ing the or de r of

the bankr upt cy c ourt. W e ins tr

uc t the dis tr ic t c ourt t o va cate the or de r of the bankr upt cy c ourt and t o r em an d to the bankr upt cy c ourt f or f urthe r pr oc ee din gs. REVERSED. 1
#### Thomas Rhodes, Respondent-Appellant, v United Parcel Service et al., Appellants-Respondents.

[822 NYS2d 521]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered April 25, 2005, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment since questions of fact exist as to the applicability of the emergency doctrine, including whether defendant Kippins kept the vehicle he was driving a safe distance from plaintiff s van, whether he was traveling at an unsafe rate of speed given the rain and wet road, whether he timely applied the brakes, and whether plaintiff’s vehicle was propelled backward in a southerly direction into Kippins’ vehicle *(see e.g. Caristo v Sanzone,*96 NY2d 172 [2001]; *Rivera v New York City Tr. Auth.,*77 NY2d 322 [1991]; *Rabassa v Caldas,*306 AD2d 137 [2003]; *Quiles v Greene,*291 AD2d 345 [2002]). In view of these same issues, the cross motion for summary judgment as to liability was properly denied as well *(cf. Johnson v Phillips,*261 AD2d 269 [1999]). Concur—Buckley, RJ., Tom, Marlow, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,344
<SECURITIES>                                 1,146,331
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,112
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,152,787
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,152,787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          148,521
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,004,266
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,152,787
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               918,558
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (227,459)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                691,099
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   691,099
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   115.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   115.80
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofStanley, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterended September 26, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Philip O. Nolan, Chairman,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Brian J. Clark,Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)    TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly represents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ PHILIP O. NOLAN                                    |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Philip O. Nolan                                        |   |
| Chairman, President and Chief Executive  Officer       |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)                          |   |
| October 30, 2008                                  |   |
|                                                   |   |
|                                                   |   |
| /s/ BRIAN J. CLARK                                     |   |
| Brian J. Clark                                         |   |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial  Officer and |   |
| Treasurer                                              |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                          |   |
| October 30, 2008                                  |   |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 23, 2015

jam

Order 

Clerk

July 23, 2015

151850 (27)

CARL HENDON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 151850

COA: 326434 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the 

order of July 7, 2015 is denied because it does not appear that the order was entered 

erroneously. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay the initial 

partial filing fee of $18.00 as ordered. Failure to comply with the terms of this order 

shall result in administrative dismissal of plaintiff’s appeal.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
of Empire Banc Corporation on Form S-8 (Registration Statement No. 33-
58578), of our report dated January 18, 1996 on the consolidated financial
statements of Empire Banc Corporation, as of December 31, 1995 and 1994
and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995,
which report is included in the 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Empire
Banc Corporation.




<TABLE>
<S>                                    <S>

                                        /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP 
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 20, 1996

</TABLE>
#### B.B.C.F.D., S.A., et al., Respondents, v Bank Julius Baer & Co. Ltd. et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[852 NYS2d 771]

Defendants concede that the statute of repose (UCC 4-A-505) does not bar all plaintiffs’ claims, since some of the claims involve certain items that do not constitute “funds transfers” within the meaning of UCC article 4-A. However, those claims to which the statute of repose applies must be dismissed as time-barred *(see Regatos v North Fork Bank,*5 NY3d 395, 402-403 [2005]).

The evidence establishes that plaintiff Bijan Nassi reviewed *379the bank statements himself for a period of more than 12 years and neither objected to the funds transfers nor consulted with his own accountants or financial advisors as to the accuracy of the statements or because he found them difficult to understand. Thus, Nassi’s claim that the bank statements were unclear and did not reasonably put him on notice of the alleged fraud is unavailing *(see Potts & Co. v Lafayette Natl. Bank,*269 NY 181, 187 [1935]). His testimony that he was assured by bank personnel that the bank statements could be reconciled with the statements of his faithless agent *(see Thomson v New York Trust Co.,*293 NY 58, 69 [1944]) is insufficient to support a claim of fraud against defendants so as to toll the statute of repose.

It remains to be determined which claims are governed by the statute of repose and should therefore be dismissed. Concur— Saxe, J.P., Gonzalez, Buckley and Acosta, JJ. *[See*2007 NY Slip Op 30986(U).]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Orient Paper, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Zhenyong Liu,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the
date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

|                        |     |                                
|----------------------- | --- | -------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2009 | By: | /s/ Zhenyong
  Liu             
|                        |     |                                
|                        |     | Zhenyong Liu                   
|                        |     | Chief
  Executive Officer      
|                        |     | (principal
  executive officer)

19

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

          - 5 CFR Part 1600

# AGENCY:

Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

# ACTION:

Interim final rule with request for comments.

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (Agency) is announcing the effective date of its regulation published on June 19, 2009 (74 FR 29111) pertaining to the timing of agency contributions.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         The Agency's interim final rule published on June 19, 2009 (74 FR 29111) took effect on June 22, 2009 when President Obama signed HR 1256 (Pub. L. 111-31) which contained the Thrift Savings Plan Enhancement Act of 2009 (Act).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Laurissa Stokes at (202) 942-1645.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Act provides that Agency Automatic (1%) Contributions and Agency Matching Contributions shall commence immediately. The regulatory amendment is necessary because FRTIB regulations follow current law, which provides that Agency Automatic (1%) Contributions and Agency Matching Contributions shall not commence until the equivalent of the second open season that begins after the employee commenced employment. The FRTIB is setting a August 1, 2009 effective date for this regulation to allow employing agencies sufficient time to make the necessary computer programming changes to implement it. The regulation took effect on June 22, 2009, and employing agencies must implement this change as soon as practicable but no later than the first pay period in August.

Gregory T. Long,

Executive Director, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. E9-15536 Filed 6-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
Court of Appeals

Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler

BILL OF COSTS

Court of Appeals No. 12-12-00312-CV

Trial Court No. 3-41481

Gerald K. Johnson

Vs.

Frederick M. Evans and Christine G. Evans

DOCUMENTS FILED AMOUNT FEE PAID BY

Motion fee

Motion fee

Motion fee

Motion fee

Motion fee

Motion fee

Motion fee

Response Filed by Appellant

Response Filed by Appellee

Motion fee

Motion fee

Motion fee

Motion fee

Indigent

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

Filing

$15.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$20.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$25.00

$50.00

$100.00

Gerald K. Johnson

Gerald K. Johnson

Gerald Johnson

Stephen Evans

Gerald K. Johnson

Gerald Johnson

Gerald Johnson

Gerald K. Johnson

Stephen Evans

Gerald Johnson

Gerald Johnson

Gerald Johnson

Gerald Johnson

Gerald Johnson

Gerald Johnson

Gerald Johnson

TOTAL: $320.00

I, Cathy S. Lusk, Clerk of the Court of Appeals, Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler,

Texas, certify that the above copy of the Bill of Costs is true and correct. GIVEN UNDER MY

HAND AND SEAL OF SAID COURT, at Tyler, this 10th day of July 2015, A.D.

CATHY LUSK, CLERK

By:_____________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
FILE COPY