alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Labor Employer Reporting Instructions

Part I - Prerequisite Knowledge for Labor Employer Reporting 

Chapter 1: What is the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board?

1

The U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) is an independent agency in the executive branch of 

the Federal Government.

Function

The RRB’s primary function is to administer comprehensive retirement-survivor and 

unemployment-sickness benefit programs for the nation’s railroad workers and their families 

under the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act 

(RUIA). As part of the retirement program, the RRB also has administrative responsibilities 

under the Social Security Act for certain benefit payments and Medicare coverage to the nation’s 

railroad workers’ and their families.

Benefit Payments

The benefit payments administered by the RRB are based on earnings credits defined as 

creditable service and compensation. The RRB maintains a lifetime record of creditable service 

and compensation for each railroad employee for the purpose of determining benefit payments.

Service and compensation information is collected from reports of employers covered under the 

RRA and the RUIA, including rail labor employers. In the context of reporting to the RRB, the 

term “employer” refers to both rail carriers and national rail labor organizations. 

The RRB is authorized to require an employer to submit service and compensation information 

by RRB Regulation 20 CFR 209.2 and by RRA sections 7(b)(6) and 9 and RUIA sections 6 and 

12(1). Both Acts make provision for enforcement of reporting requirements.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SGS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the Report), the undersigned each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            |  |                                                
|----------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|May 8, 2008 |  | /s/ Henry R. Baughman                          
|            |  | Henry R. Baughman                              
|            |  | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
|            | 
|May 8, 2008 |  | /s/ James M. Dahmus                            
|            |  | James M. Dahmus                                
|            |  | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              90
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    90
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      90
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,169
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        259
<COMMON>                                         3,331
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,700,556
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        90
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (388,213)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (388,213)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-F  ("Issuer") for the period
ending  September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 20th day of November, 2006.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-F
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-F and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-F and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31279-31280]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15396]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 
Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition to the Special 
Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HHS gives notice of a decision to designate a class of 
employees for the Standard Oil Development Company in Linden, New 
Jersey, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the 
Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. 
On June 18, 2009, the Secretary of HHS designated the following class 
of employees as an addition to the SEC:

    All AWE employees of the Standard Oil Development Company in 
Linden, New Jersey, during the period from August 13, 1942 through 
December 31, 1945, while working for a number of work days 
aggregating at least 250 work days, either solely under this 
employment or in

[[Page 31280]]

combination with work days within the parameters established for one 
or more other classes of employees in the SEC.

    This designation will become effective on July 18, 2009, unless 
Congress provides otherwise prior to the effective date. After this 
effective date, HHS will publish a notice in the Federal Register 
reporting the addition of this class to the SEC or the result of any 
provision by Congress regarding the decision by HHS to add the class to 
the SEC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Elliott, Director, Office of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, 
OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). 
Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#68272b293b282b2c2b462f273e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e9a6aaa8baa9aaadaac7aea6bf">[email protected]</span></a>.

Christine M. Branche,
Acting Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E9-15396 Filed 6-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-17-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 123 (Monday, June 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31086-31087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15269]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Notice To Rescind Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental 
Impact Statement; Jefferson County, MO

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT and the Missouri 
Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Rescind Notice of Intent to prepare an environmental impact 
statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that we 
are rescinding the Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an environmental 
impact statement (EIS) for improvements that were proposed to the 
transportation system in Jefferson County, Missouri.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy J. Casey, Environmental Projects 
Team Leader, FHWA Division Office, 3220 West Edgewood, Suite H, 
Jefferson City, Missouri 65109, Telephone: (573) 638-2620 or Kathy 
Harvey, State Design Engineer, Missouri Department of Transportation, 
P.O. Box 270, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, Telephone: (573) 526-
5678.

[[Page 31087]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in cooperation with the Missouri 
Department of Transportation (MoDOT), is rescinding the NOI to prepare 
an EIS for a project that had been proposed to improve the 
transportation system in Jefferson County, Missouri. The NOI is being 
rescinded because locally elected officials and members of the local 
community expressed the need to find more immediate and localized 
improvements to address safety and congestion problems, and do not 
support this project.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing 
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on 
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)

    Issued on: June 24, 2009.
Peggy J. Casey,
Environmental Projects Team Leader, Jefferson City.
[FR Doc. E9-15269 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
E-mail

To:   Leap Employees
From: Leonard Stephens

Dear Leap Employees:

      Pursuant to Harvey White's announcement earlier today, below are links to
our option exchange and supplemental grant program site that contain details of
the program. These are the same documents that are included in the personal
packages that are being distributed beginning today to all employees who have
options that are eligible for exchange. Eligible options are options with
exercise prices of $35.00 or more granted under the 1998 Stock Option Plan or
the Cricket Communications, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan that are held by Leap
employees (other than senior vice presidents and higher ranking officers
(including executive officers)). If you have eligible options and received a
package of materials regarding the option exchange, please read the information
provided and, as advised in the announcement, carefully consider your decision.
If you wish to participate in this program, your election form must be received
by Stock Administration no later than 9:00 p.m. PST on Tuesday, December 18,
2001.

      To answer any questions you have, round table discussions will be held
periodically with myself, Jim Hoffmann and Laura Borda. If you have
further questions after reading the Offer to Exchange and the Form of Election
Concerning Exchange of Stock Options, you are invited to send your questions to
our internal e-mail address: optionexchange@leapwireless.com, and a response
will be delivered back to you.

The intranet website for the information on this offer is:

http:/intranet/optionquestions//

Additionally, each of you are encouraged to view Harvey White's webcast which
will be available later today at the web site set forth above.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                            THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE

        This Third Amendment to Lease ("THIRD AMENDMENT") is made as of August
14, 2001, with reference to that certain Net Lease Agreement dated January 4,
2001, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Lease dated February 1, 2001
and that certain Second Amendment to Lease and Acknowledgement dated June 18,
2001 (together, the "LEASE") by and between STANFORD RANCH I, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, as "LANDLORD" therein, and WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC., a
California corporation, as "TENANT" therein, regarding those certain premises
("PREMISES") located at 3750 Atherton Road, Rocklin, California, as more
particularly described in the Lease.

        NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual agreements herein
contained, the parties hereto hereby amend the Lease and agree as follows:

1. Premises. The Premises consist of approximately 14,057 Rentable Square Feet
which is 34.28% ("TENANT'S PROPORTIONATE SHARE") of the rentable square feet of
the Building.

2. Relationship to Lease. This Amendment supercedes any inconsistent provisions
contained in the Lease. Except as amended hereby, the Lease is in full force and
effect.

3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, which, when
taken together shall be one and the same instrument.

               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Third
Amendment as of the date set forth below.

LANDLORD:                                 TENANT:

STANFORD RANCH I, LLC,                    WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.,
a Delaware limited liability company      a California corporation


By: /s/ KENNETH A. GIANNOTTI                  By: /s/ RICHARD MYERS   8/14/2001
   ---------------------------------         ----------------------------------
Its: V.P.                                 Its: V.P.
    --------------------------------          ---------------------------------
@article{1210141,
  author = {Daniel Wines and Tian Xie and Kamal Choudhary},
  title = {Inverse Design of Next-Generation Superconductors Using Data-Driven Deep Generative Models},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-07-18 04:07:00},
  publisher = {Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936647},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c01260},
  language = {en},
}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6175

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

JERRICK LAMONT RORIE, a/k/a Duwop, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District 

Judge. (4:08-cr-00367-TLW-3; 4:15-cv-05113-TLW) 

Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 22, 2016

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Jerrick Lamont Rorie, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, 

Jr., Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Columbia, South Carolina, Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Jerrick Lamont Rorie seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Rorie has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
ACCEPTED

12-15-00104-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

7/20/2015 8:19:16 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
**1362 CAF 14-00212**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF ZINETA AVDIC, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
REFIK AVDIC, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

------------------------------------------- IN THE MATTER OF REFIC AVDIC, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V
ZINETA AVDIC, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

------------------------------------------- SUSAN MARRIS, ESQ., ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2).

SUSAN B. MARRIS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, MANLIUS, APPELLANT PRO SE. SAUNDERS KAHLER, L.L.P., UTICA (JAMES S. RIZZO OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT AND RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR., UTICA, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT AND PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Appeals from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Louis P. Gigliotti, A.J.), entered January 13, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded respondent-petitioner Refik Avdic sole custody of the subject child. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the petition is dismissed.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Avdic v Avdic ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 13, 2015]).

Entered: February 13, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### Dorothy Clarke LETTICE, as Executrix of the Will of Zellah May Gray, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

Civ. No. 62-1163.

United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division.

Nov. 4, 1964.

Flint & MacKay, by Paul Burks, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Manuel L. Real, U. S. Atty., James S. Bay, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant the United States.

KUNZEL, District Judge.

In this action for refund the Government had first assessed a deficiency based upon the value of $300.00 per month, and then assessed a deficiency based upon the entire value of the trust.

The Government contends that under the following provision of the trust, the entire trust estate is includible in the decedent’s gross estate in that the trust could have been invaded by the Settlor to the full extent of its income:

> “The Trustees, out of the net income, shall pay the sum of $300.00 per month to the Settlor so long as she shall live, and in addition thereto the Trustees shall, in their absolute discretion, use all or any part of the remaining income to provide suitable support, maintenance, comfort and enjoyment for Settlor, so long as she shall live and the reasonable expenses of her last illness and burial * *

The Government’s position being that the word “enjoyment” connotes a subjec*124tive test and that if the Settlor had desired to use the entire income of the trust for whatever purpose, she would have been able to enforce the right to such income in a court of equity on the ground that such use would be for her enjoyment.

It is my view that the law of Missouri as announced in the cases precludes this inasmuch as the trustee had the “absolute discretion”. See Bakewell v. Mercantile Trust Company, 308 S.W.2d 341 (Mo.App.1957); Lyter v. Vestal, 355 Mo. 457, 196 S.W.2d 769 (1946); and Williams v. Hund, 302 Mo. 451, 258 S.W. 703 (1924).

The claim for refund as to the deficiency of $12,832.97 is disallowed and refund for the deficiency of $72,070.64 is allowed together with the interest paid thereon in the amount of $14,373.64.

Plaintiff shall prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance herewith, and a judgment in a separate document.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE 

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING 

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(D)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

The State, Respondent, 

v. 

Kevin Jerome Gilliard, Petitioner. 

Appellate Case No. 2012-213344 

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS 

Appeal from Anderson County 

J. Cordell Maddox, Jr., Circuit Court Judge 

Opinion No. 2015-MO-041 

Heard June 16, 2015 – Filed July 15, 2015 

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY 

GRANTED 

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of 

Columbia, for Petitioner. 

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson and Senior Assistant 

Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of 

Columbia, for Respondent. 
 

PER CURIAM: We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' 

decision in State v. Gilliard, Op. No. 2012-UP-351 (S.C. Ct. App. filed June 13, 

2012). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED 

PLEICONES, Acting Chief Justice, BEATTY, KITTREDGE, 

HEARN, JJ., and Acting Justice James E. Moore, concur.