alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**30,CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND      PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.   | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September                30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the period ending September 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                United Nations Securities Associations,                Inc. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                      |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| */s/                Lord Dr. Masaaki Ikawa*                                                                               |   |   |        |
| Lord                Dr. Masaaki IkawaChief                Executive Officer andPrincipal                Financial Officer |   |   |        |

----
@article{1216661,
  author = {Mikhail Ryazanov and David Nesbitt},
  title = {Non-equilibrium dynamics at the gas-liquid interface: State-resolved studies of NO evaporation from a benzyl alcohol liquid microjet},
  year = {2023},
  number = {158},
  month = {2023-03-13 04:03:00},
  publisher = {The Journal of Chemical Physics},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=956792},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0143254},
  language = {en},
}
Exhibit 15.1

LOGO

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms

The Board of Directors of BHP Billiton Limited and BHP Billiton Plc:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-206983) on Form F-3 of BHP Billiton Finance (USA) Limited and the
registration statements (Nos. 333-100496, 333-141531 and 333-160636) on Form S-8 of BHP Billiton Limited of our reports dated 21 September 2016, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the BHP Billiton Group (comprising BHP Billiton
Plc, BHP Billiton Limited and their respective subsidiaries) as of 30 June 2016 and 30 June 2015, and the related consolidated income statements, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, consolidated statements of changes in equity
and consolidated cash flow statements for each of the years in the three-year period ended 30 June 2016, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of 30 June 2016, which reports appear in the 30 June 2016
Annual Report on Form 20-F of the BHP Billiton Group.



|                       |  |                     
|---------------------- |  | --------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP           |  | /s/ KPMG            
|KPMG LLP               |  | KPMG                
|London, United Kingdom |  | Melbourne, Australia
|21 September 2016      |  | 21 September 2016   



|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |  |                                                                                      |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|KPMG, an Australian partnership and KPMG LLP, a UKlimited liability partnership, member firms of the KPMGnetwork of independent member firms affiliated withKPMG International Cooperative
(KPMGInternational), a Swiss entity. |  | KPMGs liability limited by ascheme approved underProfessional StandardsLegislation. |  | KPMG LLPRegistered in England No OC301540
Registered office: 15 Canada Square, London, E14 5GL For full
details of our professional registration please referto Regulatory Information under About/About KPMG at
www.kpmg.com/uk
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AK AN B OY D, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. O FFI CE O F RI SK I N SU RA N CE M A N A G E M E N T ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 15595 D . C. N o . 3 : 1 0 - c v - 0 2 9 7 1 - RS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia R i c har d S e e bor g, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e bruary21, 2012 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , M cK E O W N , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A k an B o y dap p e a ls p r o s e f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t d is m is s in g h is 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng vi ol a t i ons of the E qua l P r ot e c t i on C l aus e a nd the A d m in is tr a tiv e P r o c e du r e A c t. W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e 

# FI LED MA R 06 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 15595 2 r e v ie w d e n o v o , Kn i e v e l v . ES PN, 3 9 3 F . 3 d1 0 6 8 , 1 0 7 2 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 5 ) , a n dwe a f f i rm. T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyd is m is s e dB o y d ’s a c tio n b e c au s e C a lif o rn ias ta te agenci es ar e i m m un e f

rom sui ti n federa l court , and B oyd fai l ed t o am end t o st at e a c la im a g a in s t an yin d iv idu a l d e f e n d an t d e s p ite a n o p p o rtu n ityto d o s o . See W i l l v. Mi ch. D ep’t

of State P ol i ce , 491 U . S . 58, 66 ( 1989) ( § 1983 doe s notove rr i de the s ta te s ’ E le v e n th A m e n d m e n t im m u n ityf r o m b e in g s u e din f

e d e r a l c o u rt) ; R i

gg le v . Ca lifo rn ia , 57 7 F . 2d 57 9, 58 5-86 (9th C i r. 19 78 ) ( C al i forni a T ortC l ai m s A ctdo es notw a i ve the s t a t e s ’ ors t a t e a ge nc i e s ’ E l e ve nth A m e ndm e nti m m uni tyf r om be i ng s u e din f e d e r a l c o u rt) . B oyd’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.
*Thursday, April 3, 1997*

DISCIPLINARY DOCKET

97-287.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Schwartz.

On February 5,1997, movant, Office of Disciplinary Counsel, filed a motion for order to appear and show cause, requesting the court to issue an order directing respondent, Sander Schwartz, to appear and show cause why he should not be found in contempt of this court. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that the motion be, and is, hereby granted to the extent that respondent show cause by filing a written response with the Clerk of this court on or before twenty days from the date of this order why he should not be found in contempt.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, *sua sponte,*that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, *sua sponte,*that service shall be deemed made on respondent by sending this order, and all other orders in this case, by certified mail to the most recent address respondent has given to the Attorney Registration Office.
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
period covered by the Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Thomas M. PetroThomas M. PetroPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 13, 2006By:

/s/ Jerry D. HolbrookJerry D. HolbrookChief Financial Officer and SecretaryNovember 13, 2006
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 674 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the achievements of Edgar Ricardo Arjona Morales, in honor of Hispanic Heritage 

Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 31, 2019 

Mrs. TORRES of California submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the achievements of Edgar Ricardo Arjona Morales, 

in honor of Hispanic Heritage Month. 

Whereas Guatemalan musician Edgar Ricardo Arjona Morales was born in Antigua, Guatemala, on January 19, 

1964; 

Whereas Arjona initially worked as a schoolteacher in rural 

Guatemala; 

Whereas Arjona has recorded sixteen full-length records since 

the release of his debut album, Dejame Decir Que Te 

Amo; 

Whereas Arjona has received extensive critical praise for his 

songwriting, which addresses challenges facing GuateVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:51 Oct 31, 2019 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR674.IH HR674

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 674 IH 

mala such as racism, poverty, inequality, and violence, 

root causes of migration; 

Whereas, in 1993, Guatemalan President Ramiro de Leon 

Carpio honored Arjona with the Rafael Ovalle Order; 

Whereas, in 2005, Arjona founded Fundacio ́n Adentro to 

help bring musical education to impoverished children in 

Guatemala, which has constructed two schools for children in Guatemala; 

Whereas, in 2017, Arjona received a Lifetime Achievement 

Award at the Latin American Music Awards; and 

Whereas following the Fuego volcano eruption in 2018, 

Arjona supported families who were relocated, providing 

them with new permanent housing: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) in honor of Hispanic Heritage Month, con3 gratulates Edgar Ricardo Arjona Morales on his mu4 sical achievements; 

5 (2) commends Arjona for his commitment to 

6 address inequality and improve opportunities for 

7 Guatemalans; and 

8 (3) celebrates the achievements of all Guate9 malan and Guatemalan-American musicians and art10 ists who share with the world the richness and 

11 strength of Guatemalan culture and heritage. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge et al., Appellants, et al., Petitioners, v Town of Ramapo et al., Respondents.

Submitted December 3, 2012;

decided February 12, 2013

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal against Mosdos Chofetz Chaim, Inc., dismissed upon the ground that as to that party the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action/proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Judge Rivera taking no part.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Middle Kingdom Alliance Corp. (the Company) on Form 10Q, for the three
month period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Fred A. Brasch, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Fred A. Brasch     
|Fred A. Brasch         
|Chief Financial Officer

May 14, 2007
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 41770

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

WILLIAM C. DORAHUSH, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 556

Filed: July 20, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, Gem

County. Hon. George A. Southworth, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and concurrent unified sentences of twenty-five years, 

with minimum periods of confinement of five years, for conspiracy to commit 

arson and first degree arson, affirmed. 

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

William C. Dorahush, Jr. pled guilty to conspiracy to commit arson and first degree 

arson. I.C. §§ 18-1701 and 18-802. In exchange for his guilty plea, additional charges were 

dismissed including an allegation that he was a persistent violator. The district court sentenced 

Dorahush to concurrent unified terms of twenty-five years, with minimum periods of 

confinement of five years. Dorahush filed an I.C.R 35 motion, which the district court denied. 

Dorahush appeals.
2

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Dorahush’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00382-CR

Joshua Allen SCHOPPMAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR0695

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED July 22, 2015.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
****EXHIBIT 32.1****

 

****Certificationof Periodic Financial Report****

****Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350****

 

Forpurposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, John Saunders the ChiefExecutive Officer of Integrated Management Information, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

 

(i)                 the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)                the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  May 13, 2010                |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/  John Saunders                      |   |
| John  Saunders, Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
@misc{1146,
  author = {Simon Kaplan and Leonard Hanssen and Raju Datla},
  title = {Infrared Optical Properties of Materials},
  year = {2015},
  month = {2015-02-24},
  publisher = {Special Publication (NIST SP), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.250-94},
  language = {en},
}
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS 

P.O. BOX I2308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 787I I 

A':Z'· .· .. ,.,,, .•. 

A)/ C'''•M:~*'4~·~ v~<Y ,,.,.-· ,, .••• ~~ 

t'"c· <:s .r ""'····. · 4:0 " \ .·YA... \\* 5o J"\ .~,.. .,; "it'\\. f:i f£!! ;~ ~ ,· .~\~ ~~- \!\~:~\ i> .>;": ,.}-~~· ~-'1..> ~t ~<·,. ) ~ 

6/1 0/2015 ~ ;:;; : ~/\ t\ ·.h ~ (!; ~ 

WILSON, LILNIFTY GENERAL::•,' :~-.r: ct::J,N.Q. 2,0l?CR8462-W2 WR-80,647-02 

. Th_is is to advise that the Cou_rt"~~~"c:ly"~q .. ~it~~ut wri~tep order th~ application for 

wnt of habeas corpus on the f1nd1n·gs!of tlrt.eJtnai"tourt Without a heanng. 

o6\··;..>·••.,:.t.i'~ 

""'~''' .. \f. 

. "'-;;:;;,:t:?.zx;&· Abel Acosta Clerk 

' 

LILNIFTY GENERAL WILSON 

BYRD UNIT~- TDC # 1851178 

21 FM 247 

HUNTSVILLE, TX .77320 

.. ·:. -~~~ ~~;~ 

-..... ~ ''\;a
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 17, 2015

No. 04-15-00430-CR

EX PARTE Jaime LUEVANO

Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

On July 10, 2015, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus. The court has 

determined that it lacks jurisdiction to consider relator’s petition. Accordingly, relator’s petition 

is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s 

opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on July 17, 2015.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 15-03-00028-CRK, styled The State of Texas v. Jaime Luevano, pending 

in the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas, the Honorable Paul Canales presiding.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael G. Archbold, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of VS Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2007



|    |  |                                            
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Michael G. Archbold                    
|    |  | Michael G. Archbold                        
|    |  | Chief Financial and Chief Operating Officer
#### Ivelisse T. et al., Respondents, v Property Resource Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[851 NYS2d 872]

No opinion. Order filed. Concur-Tom, J.P., Gonzalez, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.