alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - July 2006 

Benefit payments July 2006 July 2005 

Regular Retirement 

and Survivor Benefits 

Total 

Retired employ

Spouses and d

Widow(er)s - a

Other survivors 

ees 

ivorced spouses 

ged and disabled 

22,818,000 

93,839,000 

157,572,000 

$792,922,000 

518,693,000 

22,078,000 

91,276,000 

155,086,000 

$763,607,000 

495,167,000 

Average under 

Being paid Awarded in Social Security 

Monthly benefits end of month month July 2006 

Number Average1 Number Average1 Being Paid Awarded 

Total 585,800 ......... 2,600 ......... ......... .........

Regular employee annuities, total 279,800 $1,821 1,200 $2,447 ......... .........

 Age 195,700 1,781 2 600 2 2,867 $1,008 3 $1,252

 Disability, Full Retirement Age and Over 34,200 1,623 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Disability, Under Full Retirement Age 50,000 2,114 300 2,352 944 999 

Spouses and divorced spouses 138,600 668 700 862 486 357 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 140,300 1,112 600 1,472 955 782 

Widowed mothers and fathers 900 1,413 4/ 990 729 718 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 14,600 741 100 815 5/ 5/ 

Children 11,500 821 4/ 873 659 650 

Other survivors 4/ 803 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Benefit payments 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

July 

2006 

$5,075,000 

July 

2005 

$5,185,000 

Number 

121,400 

Average 

$42 600 

Number

$41 

Average 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement. 

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 35); about 300

 other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis. 

4

Fewer than 50. 

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers. 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. 

Regular retirement and survivor benefit payments total includes hospital insurance benefits for services in Canada. 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

July 2006 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Average payment 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period

 Per

 full week 

Unemployment 1,900 $468 $275 

Sickness 5,400 

July 2006 

485 

Benefit payments 

278 

July 2005 

Unemployment

Total 

2,154,000 

$6,182,000 $4,811,000

1,383,000 

Sickness 4,027,000 3,428,000 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited). Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.

 Recycled

 Paper 

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary
EXHIBIT
32.1


AMERALIA,
INC.





Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350


Principal
Executive Officer





To my
knowledge: the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2006,
containing financial statements for the period then ended, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934; and the
information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AmerAlia, Inc.
for the periods presented.








June 5,
2008








/s/ Bill H
      GunnBill
      H. GunnPrincipal
      Executive Officer








Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350


Principal
Financial Officer





To my
knowledge: the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2004,
containing financial statements for the period then ended, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934; and the
information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AmerAlia, Inc.
for the periods presented.








June 5,
2008








/s/ Robert van
      MourikRobert
      C.J. van MourikPrincipal
      Financial Officer
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT, AT TEXARKANA

No. 06-14-00099-CV

In re The Estate of Nobie Florence Parker, Deceased

(No. CV11-1728 IN 276TH DISTRICT COURT OF CAMP COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

CLERK'S RECORD

REPORTER'S RECORD

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

FILING

INDIGENT

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51 FEE

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$50.00

$1,273.00

$20.00

$100.00

$25.00

$50.00

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

CHAD M RUBACK

CHAD M RUBACK

TOM S. MCCORKLE

BRADLEY W ELLISON

TOM MCCORKLE

TOM MCCORKLE

BRADLEY W ELLISON

BRADLEY W ELLISON

BRADLEY W ELLISON

BRADLEY W ELLISON

Balance of costs owing to the Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE 

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct 

copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF 

TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, 

as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, 

witness my hand and the Seal of 

the COURT OF APPEALS for 

the Sixth District of Texas, this 

July 21, 2015.

DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK

By ___________________________

Deputy
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6339** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DENNIS WAYNE ROWSEY, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News
. Mark S. Davis , District Judge. ( 4:11

- cr - 00053

- MSD

- TEM

- 1 ; 4:14

- cv - 00015

- MSD )

Submitted : July 31, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Dennis Wayne Rowsey, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt , Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Denni s Wayne Rowsey, Jr. , seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (2012)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denie s relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independentl y reviewed the record and conclude that Rowsey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
BLS Technical Advisory Committee 

May 27, 2021

 

12:00 pm Commissioner’s Welcome and Review of Agency Developments

12:30 pm Next Steps in Measuring the Impact of Automation, AI, and Digitization on the 

Employment Landscape

Presenters: Nicole Nestoriak, BLS – Office of Compensation and Working Conditions

Struther Van Horn, BLS – Office of Survey Methods Research

Karen Kosanovich, BLS – Office of Employment and Unemployment 

Statistics

Discussants: Bart Hobijn, Arizona State University

Aysegul Sahin, University of Texas at Austin

2:00 pm Break

2:15 pm Combining Probability and Non-Probability Sampling Methods: Applications to OCWC 

and OEUS Survey Programs

Presenters: Xingyou Zhang, BLS – Office of Compensation and Working Conditions

Ken Robertson, BLS – Office of Employment and Unemployment 

Statistics

Discussants: Julia Silge, RStudio

Brady West, University of Michigan 

3:45 pm Concluding Remarks

4:00 pm Conclusion

All times Eastern Standard Time. Please contact BLSTAC@bls.gov for questions.

Register at https://blstac.eventbrite.com
#### Jane Ridolfi, Appellant, v Anne Williams et al., Respondents.

[853 NYS2d 56]

*296The record evidence establishes that summary judgment was properly granted in this action where plaintiff was injured when she slipped on the bottom step of defendants’ exterior staircase during a rainstorm, and fell forward. The subject staircase was equipped with handrails on both sides and plaintiff testified that despite the wet conditions, she did not hold onto the handrail as she descended the stairs, which, according to both parties’ experts, had a coefficient of friction above the standard. Regardless of the existence of any alleged building code violation in the configuration of the handrails, such was not a proximate cause of plaintiffs fall, and to find that the presence of an alternative handrail configuration would have prevented the fall would be based on speculation *(see Plowden v Stevens Partners, LLC,*45 AD3d 659 [2007]; *see also Jenkins v New York City Hous. Auth.,*11 AD3d 358, 359-360 [2004]). Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Gonzalez and Acosta, JJ. *[See*2007 NY Slip Op 31539(U).]
July 23, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CAMILE ERMINE STANLEY, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00565-CR and

 14-14-0566-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

These consolidated causes were heard on their respective records. Having 

inspected the records, this Court finds no error in either of the judgments. 

In Cause No. 14-14-00565-CR, this Court orders the judgment of the court 

below AFFIRMED. We further order appellant to pay all costs incurred in this 

appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

In Cause No. 14-14-00566-CR, this Court orders the judgment of the court 

below AFFIRMED. We further order appellant to pay all costs incurred in this 

appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/21/2015 3:51:50 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 9, 2015

No. 04-15-00262-CR

Angel H. LONGORIA,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR9330

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant has filed a motion to abate the appeal so that the trial court may reconsider the 

certification of the defendant’s right of appeal and so that an accurate certification may be 

obtained from the trial court. See TEX R. APP. P. 25.2, 35.4(c), 37.1; see also Dears v. State, 154 

S.W.3d 610, 614-15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). The motion is GRANTED. We order any 

amended Certification be signed and filed in a supplemental clerk’s record by August 10, 2015. 

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION) I, Mike Bohannan, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Iowa Renewable Energy, LLC in accordance with Rule
15(d)-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer, as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer, and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal year that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting.  5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business
issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting. Date: May 15, 2007 /s/ Mike Bohannan

Mike Bohannan, (President and Chief Executive Officer)  1
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

** 530 U.S. 466 (2000).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40063

Conference Calendar

 

ROBERTO MARTINEZ,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JONATHON DOBRE, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:1-CV-727

--------------------

October 29, 2002

Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roberto Martinez, federal prisoner No. 28733-077, appeals

the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition

challenging his 365-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with

intent to distribute more than 100 grams of methamphetamine in

light of Apprendi v. New Jersey.

** Although Martinez proceeded

pro se in the district court, he is represented by attorney Joel

David Vera on appeal. Counsel argues that the indictment was
No. 02-40063

-2-

fatally defective because it did not put Martinez on notice of

the quantity of drugs on which his sentence would be based. 

Martinez’s sentence of 365 months imprisonment does not

violate Apprendi because it is within the statutory maximum for

the offense to which he entered a guilty plea. United States v.

Keith, 230 F.3d 784, 787 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S.

1182 (2001); see 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),(b)(1)(A)(vii); 21 U.S.C.

§ 846. Furthermore, Apprendi does not apply retroactively to

cases on collateral review and an Apprendi claim does not satisfy

the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2255's savings clause. See

Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary, Beaumont, TX, 305 F.3d 343 (5th Cir.

2002).

Counsel raises four additional arguments not raised in the

district court: that the trial court should have held a hearing

to determine whether the Government’s decision not to file a

U.S.S.G. § 5k1.1 motion was made in good faith; and that the

trial court erred at sentencing by denying a downward adjustment

for acceptance of responsibility, by finding that Martinez had a

leadership role in the offense, and by holding Martinez

responsible for 200 pounds of methamphetamine. 

In addition to the fact that the foregoing issues were not

presented to the district court for consideration, we note that

the three sentencing arguments are barred by the waiver provision

of Martinez’s plea agreement and that none of the arguments are

cognizable under § 2241. Counsel is CAUTIONED that he has a duty
No. 02-40063

-3-

not to raise frivolous arguments on appeal. See United States v.

Burleson, 22 F.3d 93, 95 (5th Cir. 1994). 

Counsel has abandoned Martinez’s district-court arguments

that the Government breached the plea agreement by offering

evidence of excessive drug quantities and that the district court

erroneously departed upward when it increased Martinez’s offense

level based on his leadership role in the offense. See Yohey v.

Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of LifeCare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Phillip B.
Douglas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 220, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 21, 2006



/s/ PHILLIP B. DOUGLASPhillip B. DouglasChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 24

OWENS-ILLINOIS GROUP, INC.    POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That each individual whose signature appears below hereby consents to and appoints James W. Baehren as his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent with all power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the 2004 Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Owens-Illinois Group, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the
same, with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, granting
unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the same as fully
to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitute or substitutes, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has hereunto set his hand on the date set opposite his name.

|Signature                                     |  | Title                                                                            |  | Date          
|--------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|/s/MATTHEW G. LONGTHORNEMatthew G. Longthorne |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer); Director |  | March 16, 2005
|/s/STEVEN R. MCCRACKENSteven R. McCracken     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)               |  | March 16, 2005
|/s/THOMAS L. YOUNGThomas L. Young             |  | President (Principal Financial Officer); Director                                |  | March 16, 2005
|/s/JAMES W. BAEHRENJames W. Baehren           |  | Vice President and Secretary; Director                                           |  | March 16, 2005

---



QuickLinks
# table107_q13.1_state
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 125 (Wednesday, July 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15580]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, July 20, 2009, 8 a.m. to July 
21, 2009, 7:30 p.m., Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 
7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814 which was published in the 
Federal Register on June 15, 2009, 74 FR 28260-28262.
    The meeting will be held at the Doubletree Hotel Washington, 1515 
Rhode Island Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20005. The meeting dates and 
time remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: June 22, 2009.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-15580 Filed 6-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M