alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Rene G. Carrier, President of Quartz Mountain Resources Ltd.
(the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended July 31, 2009 (the Annual Report) fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                 

|Date:  | October 9, 2009    
|------ | -------------------
|       |                    
|       |                    
|       | /s/ Rene G. Carrier
|By:    | Rene G. Carrier    
|Title: | President          

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
40-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
#### Phillips *v.*United States.1

*(District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.*

December 20, 1887.)

Dotted States Commissioners—Docket Fees.

. United States commissioners are impliedly authorized to keep a docket, and . entitled to docket fees therefor. ■ ■

At Law.

*Henry Hazelhurst,*for plaintiff.

*John K. Valentine,*U. S. Dist. Atty., for defendant.

1

 Reported by C. Berkeley Taylor, Esq., of the Philadelphia bar.

Butler, J.

I find the following facts: The plaintiff is a commissioner of the circuit court of this district, and has been during all the time covered by the claim. Prom the beginning he has kept a docket in which is entered the names of parties, and all proceedings in each *case,—a*docket such as is kept by justices of the peace and similar magistrates. It has been the uniform custom' of commissioners in this district to keep such dockets. Nothing has been paid for the service, nor was any demand made until April 23, 1887, when a claim was inserted in a general account then presented. The claim was not allowed. Suit is now brought under the statute of March 3, 1887, which confers jurisdiction over the subject on this court.

On the foregoing facts, and in view of the decision in *U. S.*v. *Wallace,*116 U. S. 398, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 408,1 think the plaintiff should recover. I see no sufficient ground for a distinction between this case and the one just cited. It is true that in the latter the docket was kept under an order of court, while here no such order was made. The duties of commissioners are defined by statute, and I am not aware of any authority in the court to increase or-diminish them. The duty of keeping a docket seems to be a plain implication from the authority conferred to issue process and hear cases. The commissioner is a magistrate, similar in character to justices of the peace and aldermen. The latter magistrates are required to keep dockets, not only by statute, but by force of common usage. A commissioner could not properly discharge his functions without keeping a record of his proceedings. I can, therefore, see no reason for a distinction as respects “docket fees” between commissioners who have kept such a record under order of court, (granted that the order is authorized,) and those who have performed the duty without such prompting.

Judgment will therefore be entered in plaintiff’s favor for $255, the sum due for services on this account rendered within six years. The balance of the claim is barred by the limitation named in the statute.
H. Res. 546 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 3, 2019. 

Whereas, in 2014, Russia illegally occupied Ukraine’s Crimea 

region and parts of eastern Ukraine; 

Whereas these actions are in direct violation of fundamental 

principles of international law, as well as the United Nations Charter, the Helsinki Final Act, and the 1994 Budapest Memorandum; 

Whereas, in 1998, the Group of Seven invited Russia to join 

the group in an effort to encourage continued political 

and economic reforms in Russia; 

Whereas, in March 2014, the Group of Eight suspended Russia as a direct result of its actions in Ukraine, and instead continued as the Group of Seven; 

Whereas, on April 3, 2014, President Barack Obama signed 

into law the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Ukraine Act of 2014, 

which states that ‘‘it is the policy of the United States 

that the continued participation of the Russian Federation in the Group of Eight (G–8) nations should be conditioned on the Government of the Russian Federation 

respecting the territorial integrity of its neighbors and 

accepting and adhering to the norms and standards of 
2 

•HRES 546 EH 

free, democratic societies as generally practiced by every 

other member nation of the G–8 nations.’’; 

Whereas, since 2014, the President of Russia, Vladimir 

Putin, has continued to violate international law in 

Ukraine’s Crimea region and elsewhere, and has continued to undermine democracy and human rights both at 

home and abroad; and 

Whereas, on August 26, 2019, President Donald Trump, announced his intention to invite the President of Russia to 

next year’s Group of Seven summit: Now, therefore, be 

it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) reiterates its unwavering support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine; 

(2) condemns Russia’s aggressive actions in 

Ukraine, including the illegal occupation of Crimea and 

ongoing destabilization of eastern Ukraine; 

(3) condemns the Kremlin’s assaults on democratic 

societies worldwide, including in the United States and 

other Group of Seven countries; 

(4) reaffirms its full support for the suspension of 

Russia from the Group of Eight; 

(5) calls on all leaders of the Group of Seven to oppose the readmission of Russia unless and until it has 

ended its occupation of all of Ukraine’s sovereign territory, including Crimea, and halts its attacks on democracies worldwide; and 
3 

•HRES 546 EH 

(6) disapproves of Russia’s inclusion in future 

Group of Seven summits until it respects the territorial 

integrity of its neighbors and adheres to the standards 

of democratic societies. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerome Howell, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 459]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 12, 2004 *(People v Howell,*11 AD3d 560 [2004]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 19, 2000.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Florio, J.E, Schmidt, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-4590

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMIE MICHELLE BOOMER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District

Judge. (CR-01-33-FO)

Submitted: February 13, 2002 Decided: February 28, 2002

Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, G. Alan DuBois,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellant. John Stuart Bruce, United States Attorney, Christine W.

Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jamie Michelle Boomer appeals her conviction, in the wake of

her guilty plea pursuant to a written plea agreement, to one count

of conspiring to distribute methamphetamine. See 21 U.S.C.A. §§

841, 846 (West 1999 & Supp. 2001). The only issue Boomer raises on

appeal is that § 841 is unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v.

New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), a claim previously considered and

rejected by this Court in United States v. McAllister, 272 F.3d

228, 231-33 (4th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, we affirm Boomer’s

conviction and sentence and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICO Global
Communications (Holdings) Limited (Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), Michael P. Corkery, Acting Chief
Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           
|/s/ MICHAEL P. CORKERY                                     
|Michael P. Corkery                                         
|Acting Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)               
|May 11, 2009                                               

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to ICO Global Communications
(Holdings) Limited and will be retained by ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
S04A0046.

#### DARLEY v. THE STATE.

(598 SE2d 507)

HINES, Justice.

On June 3,1987, Robert Ray Darley pled guilty to malice murder, armed robbery, and theft by taking, in connection with the death of Bernice Voellinger. The State had filed a notice of intent to seek the death penalty, and after the plea hearing, Darley was sentenced to life in prison for malice murder, life in prison for armed robbery, to be served concurrently with the malice murder sentence, and 20 years in prison for theft by taking, to be served consecutively to the life sentences.

On August 19, 2002, Darley filed a “motion to hold judgments of defendant’s convictions and sentences mere nullity and to expunge such merely null judgments.” In his motion, he attacked the voluntariness of his guilty plea. The trial court denied the motion and Darley appeals. We affirm.

> It is well settled that when the term of court has expired in which a defendant was sentenced pursuant to a guilty plea the trial court lacks jurisdiction to allow the withdrawal of the plea. [Cit.] [Darley’s] only available means to withdraw his guilty plea is through habeas corpus proceedings, [cit.], and the trial court therefore properly denied [Darley’s] motion. [Cit.]

*Rice v. State,*277 Ga. 649 (594 SE2d 335) (2004).

*Judgments affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*122Decided June 28, 2004.

Robert R. Darley, *pro se.*

*Howard Z. Simms, District Attorney, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General,*for appellee.
### NUMBER 13

- 15

- 00 139

- CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

TEXAS BOARD OF NURSI NG

, Appellant,

v.

BERNARDINO PEDRAZA J R.

, Appellee.

On a ppeal from the 93rd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas



### ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes

Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant ’ s unopposed motion to abate the

appeal to allow the parties the opportunity to engage in settlement negotiations

, and

unopposed motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s record

.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the2

unopposed motion to abate, is of the opinion that the unopposed motion to abate the

appeal pen ding settlement should be granted. The motion to abate the appeal is

GRANTED and this appeal is ordered ABATED until June 1, 2015 . Appellant ’ s motion

to extend the deadline for filing the reporter’s record to May 8, 2015, is GRANTED.

The Court directs ap pellant to file, on or before June 1, 2015 , either (1) a motion

to reinstate the appeal, or (2) a motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to settlement.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed th e

7th day of May, 2015

.
@article{1212506,
  author = {Drew Rotunno and Samuel Berweger and Nik Prajapati and Aly Artusio-Glimpse and MATTHEW SIMONS and chris holloway and Amy Robinson},
  title = {Investigating electromagnetically induced transparency spectral lineshape distortion due to non-uniform fields in Rydberg-atom electrometry},
  year = {2023},
  number = {134},
  month = {2023-08-25 04:08:00},
  publisher = {Journal of Applied Physics},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=935160},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0161213},
  language = {en},
}
#### Abdulla Ahmed, Respondent, v C.D. Kobsons, Inc., Appellant.

[854 NYS2d 358]

*400On this record, there is no basis to disturb the IAS court’s determination crediting the consistent testimony of plaintiff tenant that the landlord’s principal gave him permission to sign her name in the owner-authorization section of the building-renovation application. There was no basis to conclude that the court’s findings of fact could not be reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence, especially where, as here, those findings rest in large measure on witness credibility *(Thoreson v Penthouse Intl.,*80 NY2d 490, 495 [1992]). As between the parties, the tenant did not falsely or fraudulently submit the landlord’s authorization to the proposed renovations when he signed the landlord’s signature pursuant to the landlord’s instruction. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
Or

PH != IU

WFITH E. HOTTI.L.C! 'J

/fa. /Jottc;*

/Os^a ,■„,-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

Pursuant to § 1301.33(a), Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on March 19, 2009, Wildlife Laboratories Inc., 1401 Duff Drive, Suite 400, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of Carfentanil (9743), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.

The company will manufacture the above listed controlled substance for sale to veterinary pharmacies, zoos, and for other animal and wildlife applications.

Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such a substance, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a).

Any such comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than August 25, 2009.

Dated: June 22, 2009.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-15235 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


Auditors' Consent


We have issued our reports dated February 14, 1996 accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Michael Foods, Inc. and
Subsidiaries which are included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Michael
Foods, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1995.  We hereby consent to the 
incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of 
Michael Foods, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-31914, effective November 21, 
1989; File Nos. 33-64076 and 33-64078, effective June 9, 1993; and File No. 
33-57969, effective March 7, 1995).



                                                 /s/GRANT THORNTON LLP
 

Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 14, 1996
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,718]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 31, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Weyerhaeuser Company, iLevel Dallas Sawmill, Dallas, Oregon. The workers at the subject facility produced rough planed lumber.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 18th day of May 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-15292 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Redwood Mortgage Investors VI (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Michael R. Burwell, certify, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Redwood Mortgage Investors VI and will be retained by Redwood Mortgage Investors VI and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/ Michael R. Burwell


_____________________________


Michael R. Burwell, General Partner


March 30, 2011