alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2003 of Blue Ridge Real Estate Company and Big Boulder Corporation (together , the Registrants) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick M. Flynn, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Registrants, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section 78o(d); and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrants.







/s/ PATRICK M. FLYNN

Patrick M. Flynn

Chief Executive Officer and President

February 9, 2004
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Green Irons
Holdings Corp., Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Andrew Couvell, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer, of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: July 30, 2007

By: /s/ Andrew Couvell
        Andrew Couvell
        President, Chief Executive Officer,
        Chief Financial Officer, and Principal
        Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The
undersigned, Eugene Malobrodsky, the Chief Executive Officer of INTELLIGENT
BUYING. INC.  (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.
The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2009 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 16th day of
November 2009.





/s/Eugene MalobrodskyEugene
      MalobrodskyPrincipal
      Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Intelligent Buying, Inc. and will be retained by Intelligent Buying, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Sharon C. Harrington, Respondent, v Leigh E. Harrington, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 255]

*1149Peters, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Dowd, J.), entered June 6, 2005 in Otsego County, which denied defendant’s motion for modification of a prior order of spousal maintenance.

Following a trial in May 2001, Supreme Court (Coccoma, J.) directed the equitable distribution of the parties’ marital assets which included, among other things, the marital residence, a tavern owned by the parties, pension benefits, defendant’s 40IK plan and proceeds from the sale of vacant land. This Court modified that judgment, on appeal, regarding the denial of maintenance to plaintiff and other issues which are not relevant here (300 AD2d 861 [2002]). Upon remittal, plaintiff was awarded, among other things, maintenance in the amount of $200 per week until she died, remarried or attained the age of 67. On appeal of that order, we affirmed the award of maintenance, as well as Supreme Court’s denial of defendant’s motion for a corrective order pertaining to the distribution of his 40 IK plan. Other issues, tangential to the current matter, were remitted to Supreme Court (6 AD3d 799 [2004], *lv dismissed*3 NY3d 738 [2004]).

In January 2005, defendant sought to modify his maintenance obligation pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 236. Supreme Court (Dowd, J.) denied defendant’s motion by finding the grounds to have already been considered by the trial and appellate courts; there was no substantial change of circumstances to warrant a modification.

Upon this appeal of that order, we find no abuse of discretion *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]; *Hall v Hall,*22 AD3d 979, 980-981 [2005]; *Stricos v Stricos,*309 AD2d 1047, 1048 [2003]). Nor do we find error in Supreme Court’s failure to conduct a hearing before rendering that determination since defendant’s allegations were either conclusory *(see Foster v Jones,*301 AD2d 853, 853 [2003]; *Mishrick v Mishrick,*251 AD 2d 558, 558 [1998]) or duplicative of issues previously addressed by this Court (6 AD3d 799, 800 [2004], *supra).*Having failed to show viable factual issues indicating a change in circumstances, we agree that no hearing was required *(see Szemansco v Szemansco,*11 AD3d 787, 787-788 [2004]; *Foster v Jones, supra*at 853; *Mishrick v Mishrick, supra*at 558).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of VS Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas A. Tolworthy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of VS Holdings, Inc.
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 14, 2006



/s/ Thomas A. TolworthyThomas A. Tolworthy Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
H. Res. 655 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 29, 2019. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 296) affirming the 

United States record on the Armenian Genocide. The resolution shall be considered as read. The previous question shall 

be considered as ordered on the resolution and preamble to 

adoption without intervening motion or demand for division 

of the question except one hour of debate equally divided and 

controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 31.1
  SOX
302 CERTIFICATION
  
 I, Herb
Gover, as senior servicing officer in charge of the servicing function of
CitiMortgage, Inc., certify that:
  1.      I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to
be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of
Citicorp Mortgage Securities Trust, Series 2008-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic
reports”);
 2.      Based
on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;
 3.      Based
on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by the report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 4.      I
am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based
on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer
compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,
and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
respects; and
 5.      All
of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset
backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
report on Form 10-K.
 
 
 March
30, 2009
 
 
 By:
                /s/ Herb GoverName:
                Herb
      GoverTitle:
                Senior
      Vice President, CitiMortgage, Inc.Senior
      Officer in Charge of Servicing
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 22, 2015

No. 04-15-00332-CV

MANUEL AND SIMONA CAMACHO,

Appellant

v.

TEXAS WESTCHESTER FINANCIAL, LLC,

Appellee

From the County Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 4246

Honorable Lynn Ellison, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was due to be filed with this court on June 7, 2015. On July 8, 

2015, the court reporter filed a notification of late record in which she stated that the reporter’s 

record was not filed because ) appellant has not paid, or made arrangements to pay, the reporter’s 

fee for preparing the record; and appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s 

fee. 

We therefore ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court within ten days of 

the date of this order that the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay 

the reporter’s fee or that appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. If 

appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant must file a brief with this court 

within twenty days from the date of this order, and the court will only “consider and decide those 

issues or points [raised in appellant’s brief] that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision.”

See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c), 38.6(a).

If appellant timely complies with this order, the reporter’s record will be due thirty days 

from the date appellant files written proof showing compliance with this order.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 125 (Wednesday, July 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31456]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15574]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Obstetric Pharmacology Research 
Units.
    Date: July 23, 2009.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Peter Zelazowski, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 
Executive Boulevard, Rm. 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-7510, 301-435-
6902, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2c5c4958495e025649404d56435b5f47456c424544024b435a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6f1f0a1b0a1d41150a030e1500181c04062f01060741080019">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 22, 2009.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-15574 Filed 6-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Order filed, July 17, 2015.

 In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

____________

NO. 01-15-00565-CV

COUNTY OF GALVESTON, TEXAS, Appellant

V.

TRIPLE B SERVICES, LLP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 122nd District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Case 14-CV-0031

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due July 6, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. 

The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has 

not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we 

issue the following order.

We order the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record in this appeal, 

if any, within 10 days of the date of this order.

/s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually
cc: Samuel Nathaniel Beasley, IV 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 44)e(co
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE MICHAEL GEOFFREY 

PETERS, 

RELATOR.

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00203-CR

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus

and concludes Relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore dismiss the petition for 

writ of habeas corpus. We further order that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00462-CV

Alamo Home Finance, Inc. and Gonzalez Financial Holdings, Inc.

v.

Mario Duran and Maria Duran

On Appeal from the

92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-265-09-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED 

and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal 

are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 16, 2015
97-702.

#### State v. Ellis.

Franklin App. No. 95APA10-1399. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
#### In the Matter of Gracie Point Community Council, by Its President, Anthony Ard, et al., Appellants, v New York State Department of Environmental Conservation et al., Respondents.

Submitted May 14, 2012;

decided June 27, 2012

Motion by Residents for Sane Trash Solutions for leave to appear amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 125 (Wednesday, July 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31456-31457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15584]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.


[[Page 31457]]


    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel, Fellowships in Language and Communication.
    Date: July 6, 2009.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Chicago, 151 East Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL 
60601.
    Contact Person: Dana Jeffrey Plude, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3176, MSC 7848, Bethesda, MD 
20892. 301-435-2309. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#11617d64757475517262633f7f78793f767e67"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ee9e829b8a8b8aae8d9d9cc0808786c0898198">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 22, 2009.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-15584 Filed 6-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
@article{1211706,
  author = {Enrico Lucon},
  title = {Influence of the Valid Temperature Range on Master Curve Analyses of Large Fracture Toughness Data Sets},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-07-19 04:07:00},
  publisher = {ASTM Journal of Testing and Evaluation},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936511},
  language = {en},
}
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Timothy Daugherty, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 876]

This Court previously held the appeal in abeyance and directed the filing of a supplemental brief addressing whether the denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence presents any nonfrivolous issue (41 AD3d 219 [2007]). Counsel has filed such supplemental brief and renewed the motion to withdraw as counsel. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur&emdash;Mazzarelli, J.P., Buckley, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOHN MARIO GONZALEZ ARTEAGA

, Appellant,

v.

DORIS EDY BEDOYA ALZATE

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 1

- 2259

[ January 5, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Fabienne E. Fahnestock , Judge; L.T. Case No.

FMCE19009654(35)(90).

Jonathan Mann and Robin Bresky of Bresky Law, Boca Raton, for

appellant.

Meaghan K. Marro of Marro Law, P.A., Plantation , for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

. See Esaw v. Esaw , 965 So. 2d 1261, 1264 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)

(“The most salient impediment to meaningful review of the trial court ’ s decision is not the absence of findings, but the absence of a transcript.”).

M AY

, G ERBER and F ORST

, JJ., c oncur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-14-00643-CV

Joseph Glass and Hildegard Glass 

v.

Miles Gilbert d/b/a MG Sheet Metal Works

NO. 1013437 IN THE CO CIVIL CT AT LAW NO 2 OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

CLK RECORD

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$1,040.00

$175.00

$20.00

07/10/2015

12/31/2014

11/13/2014

10/20/2014

09/11/2014

08/19/2014

08/19/2014

NOT PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

ANT

ANT

APE

APE

ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$1,275.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this July 14, 2015.