alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SNYDER v. LE ROY DYAL CO., Inc. (ROBINSKY et al., Third Party Defendants).

District Court, S. D. New York.

June 12, 1940.

George B. Warburton, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Wilbur H. Hecht, of New York City (William Weymar, Jr., of New York City, of counsel), for defendant and third party plaintiff.

Dulon & Roe, of New York City, for third party defendants.

CLANCY, District Judge.

This motion, so far as it asks that the first and third defenses in the answer of the third party defendants be stricken out, is granted on the consent of the attorneys for the third party defendant stated on the argument of this motion.

In so far as the motion seeks the dismissal of the second separate defense for its failure to recite the order authorizing the service of the third party plaintiff’s complaint, it is granted. The authority for the service of the cross claim appears in the filed order of a Judge of this Court. A recitation of this order is not required by Rule 9(c), Rules of Civil Procedure for District Courts, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The conditions precedent, referred to in ’that rule, are the conditions going to create liability or those which construct a legal capacity to sue and do not include any duty to state that procedural requirements have been fulfilled.

The motion further asks that the fourth defense be stricken. That defense alleges that the contract alleged in the third party complaint is unlike the contract in the plaintiff’s complaint; that the third party, defendant and the plaintiff had no transaction between them and no relations arising directly or indirectly out of that contract; and that the third party defendant cannot be liable to the plaintiff for all or any part of the plaintiff’s claim against the defendant and third party plaintiff. This part of the third party plaintiff’s motion is granted. It does not appear from the third party plaintiff’s complaint that the third party defendants are liable for any part of the loss of which the plaintiff complains. The authorities cited by the third party plaintiff do not sustain its position. In Morrell v. United Air Lines Transport Corp., D.C., 29 F.Supp. 757, the third party plaintiff may have intended to assert a liability upon the third party defendant to the plaintiff under the doctrine of MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050, Ann.Cas.1915C, 440, L.R.A.1916F, 696. In Kravas et al. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., D.C., 28 F.Supp. 66, there was stated in the third party plaintiff’s complaint a primary and secondary liability for the plaintiff’s loss attributable to the third party defendant.

Settle order accordingly.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 oftitle 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of OsirisTherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to the best ofeach officer’s knowledge that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended June 30, 2009 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 7, 2009 | /s/ C. RANDAL MILLS                          |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                      | C. Randal Mills, Ph.D.                       |
|                      | President & Chief Executive Officer |
|                      |                                         |
| Date: August 7, 2009 | /s/ RICHARD W. HUNT                          |
|                      | Richard W. Hunt                              |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer                      |

 

 

This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-Q towhich it relates, is not deemed filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filingof the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

1

----
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed ; and Memorandum Opinion filed March

13, 2012

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 11

- 01048

- CV

____________ IN RE CHRISTOPHER WELDON MARTIN , Relator

O RIGINAL P ROCEEDING W RIT OF M ANDAMUS 246 th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 18060



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On December 7 , 2011, relator, Christopher Weldon Martin , filed a petition for writ
of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov = t Code ' 22.221. The relief requested in the petition has been rendered moot by the parties’ mediated settlement agreement signed February 2, 2012, and the dismissal of the related appeal filed under number
14

- 11

- 00055

- CV, styled Diana Ruth Lovell v. Christopher Weldon Martin

. We order relator’s petition for writ of mandamus dismissed as moot

.
PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Jamison and McCally.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-5085 MATTHEW J. CRUSAN, ROBERT J. DONNELLY, DAVID M. HARGRODER and SHARON A. LYNN, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 07-CV-434,

Judge Marian Blank Horn. ON MOTION 

### ORDER The United States moves without opposition to stay the briefing schedule in this appeal pending disposition of 

### Easter v. United States, 2008-5187, and 

### Forbes v. United States 2009-5030. The United States asserts that this appeal and 

### Easter and 

### Forbes all involve the issue of whether the Court of Federal Claims correctly decided that the appellants were not entitled to overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et 

### seq. for time spent driving a government vehicle between home and work. The United States asserts that the court's decision in 

### Easter and 

### Forbes may resolve the overtime pay issues in this case. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:The motion is granted. The United States is directed to notify this court within 21

days of the date both mandates have issued in Easter and Forbes concerning how they believe this appeal should proceed. The appellants may also respond within that time. FOR THE COURT 

### JUL 24 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: Jules Bernstein, Esq. Shalom Brilliant, Esq. s20 

### ILO) U.S. COURT

F OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT JUL 2 4 2009 JANHORBALY CLERK

2009-5085 2
@article{1216341,
  author = {Xiaojun Wei and Tadas Penkauskas and Joseph Reiner and Mark Uline and Qian Wang and Sheng Li and Aleksei Aksimentiev and Joseph Robertson and Chang Liu},
  title = {Engineering Nanopore Approaches toward Protein Sequencing},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-07-25 04:07:00},
  publisher = {ACS Nano},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=935886},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c05628},
  language = {en},
}
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection
with the Annual Report of Cardiff Lexington Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year  ended
December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Alex Cunningham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Dated: April 14, 2020



| | By: /s/ Alex Cunningham                                  
| | ---------------------------------------------------------
| | Alex Cunningham                                          
| | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
    Officer)
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1433. POTTS v. THE STATE.

Appellant, Potts, filed this pro se appeal fromthe trial court’s order denying his

pro se motion for an out-of-time appeal fromthe judgment of conviction and sentence

entered by the trial court pursuant to a guilty plea. Appellant was provided with a

docketing notice from this Court informing him that the appeal in this case was

docketed in this Court on March 20, 2015, and that Appellant’s brief, including

enumeration of errors, was due to be filed within 20 days of docketing – no later than

April 9, 2015. Court of Appeals Rules 22 (a); 23 (a). Because Appellant did not

timely file a brief and enumeration of errors by April 9, 2015, nor did Appellant

obtain an extension of time for filing, the appeal in the captioned case is

DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a). 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/08/2015

July 08, 2015
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Jackie L. Reed

Jackie L. ReedPresident and CEODate: August 11, 2006/s/ Teresa L. Martin

Teresa L. MartinCFODate: August 11, 2006
 18
Exhibit 32.1




Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alamo Energy Corp. a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Allan Millmaker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Alamo Energy Corp., and will be retained by Alamo Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/ Allan MillmakerAllan Millmaker

Chief Executive Officer

April 21, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 354 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 354

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 21, 2019.
Whereas Congress passed the 19th Amendment to the Constitution of the United 
        States, guided by the shared ideals of freedom, sovereignty, democracy, 
        civil liberties, and individual rights;
Whereas from 1919 to 1920, the Sixty-Sixth Congress debated, and State 
        legislatures considered, an amendment to the Constitution to provide 
        suffrage for women;
Whereas on May 21, 1919, the House of Representatives approved a proposed 
        amendment, followed by the Senate a few weeks later on June 4, 1919;
Whereas the introduction, passage, and ultimate ratification of the 19th 
        Amendment were the culmination of decades of work and struggle by 
        advocates for the rights of women across the United States and 
        worldwide;
Whereas the ratification of the 19th Amendment ensured women could more fully 
        participate in our democracy and fundamentally changed the role of women 
        in the civic life of our Nation;
Whereas August 18, 2020, marks the centennial of the ratification of the 19th 
        Amendment by three-fourths of the States, providing the support 
        necessary under article V of the Constitution of the United States;
Whereas August 26, 2020, marks the centennial of the 19th Amendment becoming a 
        part of the Constitution of the United States, providing for women's 
        suffrage; and
Whereas the centennial anniversary of the ratification of the 19th Amendment 
        represents a historical milestone to be lauded and celebrated: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) celebrates the 100th anniversary of the passage and ratification 
        of the 19th Amendment, providing for women's suffrage, to the 
        Constitution of the United States;
            (2) honors the role of the ratification of the 19th Amendment in 
        further fulfilling the promise of the Constitution of the United States 
        and promoting the core values of our democracy;
            (3) reaffirms the opportunity for people in the United States to 
        learn about and commemorate the efforts of the women's suffrage movement 
        and the role of women in our democracy; and
            (4) reaffirms the desire of Congress to continue strengthening 
        democratic participation and to inspire future generations to cherish 
        and preserve the historic precedent established under the 19th 
        Amendment.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Wilfredo Ferrer, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent.

[854 NYS2d 51]

*397The jury’s verdict in favor of plaintiff is rationally supported by meteorological evidence and plaintiffs testimony showing, inter alia, that there was a four-inch accumulation of snow and ice that had developed prior to the commencement of the snow, freezing rain and plain rain that ended 22 hours before plaintiffs fall, and permitting an inference that plaintiff fell on preexisting ice *(see Tubens v New York City Hous. Auth.,*248 AD2d 291, 292 [1998]; *Seaman v City of New York,*294 AD2d 144 [2002]). Plaintiff, 25 years old at the time of the accident, sustained a fractured right tibia that required two surgeries, and caused complications to his left knee that required surgery, and to his lower back. He was still required to use a leg brace and cane at the time of trial, six years after the accident, and, in the opinion of his doctor, is permanently disabled. However, the award for past pain and suffering deviates materially from what is reasonable compensation to the extent indicated *(cf. Alvarado v City of New York,*287 AD2d 296 [2001]). Concur— Lippman, P.J., Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
##### 

10K


Exhibit 32

Certification of CEO and CFO As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of UST Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the Company), on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), we, Vincent A. Gierer, Jr., Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert T.
DAlessandro, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify,
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:



1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and result of
    operations of the Company.Dated: February 24, 2006

| |  |                                                      
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/
    VINCENT A. GIERER,
    JR.                   
| |  |                                                      
| |  | Chief Executive Officer                              
|
| |  | /s/
    ROBERT T.
    DALESSANDRO                   
| |  |                                                      
| |  | Senior Vice President and
    Chief Financial Officer









81
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 420 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 420

 Permitting official photographs of the House of Representatives to be 
taken while the House is in actual session on a date designated by the 
                                Speaker.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2019

 Ms. Lofgren (for herself and Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois) submitted 
the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Permitting official photographs of the House of Representatives to be 
taken while the House is in actual session on a date designated by the 
                                Speaker.

    Resolved, That on such date as the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives may designate, official photographs of the House may be 
taken while the House is in actual session. Payment for the costs 
associated with taking, preparing, and distributing such photographs 
may be made from the applicable accounts of the House of 
Representatives.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 125 (Wednesday, July 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31470-31471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15565]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request For Review Of A 
Revised Information Collection

[OMB Control No. 3206-0033; Form RI 25-7]

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) intends to submit to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) a request for comments on a revised 
information collection. This information collection Marital Status 
Certification Survey, ``(OMB Control No. 3206-0033; Form RI 25-7), is 
used to determine whether widows, widowers, and former spouses 
receiving survivor annuities from OPM have remarried before reaching 
age 55 and, thus, are no longer eligible for benefits.
    There are approximately 24,000 respondents. Each form takes 
approximately 15 minutes to complete. The annual estimated burden is 
625 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Cyrus S. Benson on (202) 606-
4808,

[[Page 31471]]

FAX (202) 606-0910 or via E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2c6f555e595f026e49425f43426c435c41024b435a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="97d4eee5e2e4b9d5f2f9e4f8f9d7f8e7fab9f0f8e1">[email protected]</span></a>. Please 
include a mailing address with your request.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received within 30 calendar 
days from the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--
James K. Freiert, Deputy Assistant Director, Retirement Services 
Program, Center for Retirement and Insurance Services, U.S. Office of 
Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 3305, Washington, DC 
20415-3500.
and
OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory Affair, Office of 
Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, 
NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

    For information regarding administrative Coordination contact:

Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, RIS Support Services/
Support Group, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 4H28, Washington, DC 20415, 
(202) 606-0623.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
[FR Doc. E9-15565 Filed 6-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-38-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 690 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 690

 Commending Alice Allison Dunnigan for her barrier-breaking career in 
                              journalism.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 12, 2019

    Ms. Clarke of New York (for herself and Ms. Kelly of Illinois) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                        on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commending Alice Allison Dunnigan for her barrier-breaking career in 
                              journalism.

Whereas Alice Allison Dunnigan was born on April 27, 1906, in Russellville, 
        Kentucky, where she overcame poverty, segregation, and sexism in order 
        to break barriers for African-American women throughout the country;
Whereas Ms. Dunnigan served as Washington Bureau Chief of the Associated Negro 
        Press from 1947 to 1961, publishing stories in over 110 African-American 
        newspapers throughout the country, informing people of the ways in which 
        government decisions impacted their lives and forcing decisionmakers to 
        address key issues impacting minority communities;
Whereas Ms. Dunnigan became the first African-American woman accredited to cover 
        the White House, Congress, Department of State, and Supreme Court as a 
        result of her proven journalism skills and hard-hitting reporting style;
Whereas Ms. Dunnigan was one of only three African Americans and one of two 
        women in the press corps that fully covered President Harry S. Truman's 
        1948 Presidential campaign;
Whereas Ms. Dunnigan's commitment to truth, honesty, and equality served as the 
        basis for her employment as an education consultant to the President's 
        Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity under the Kennedy 
        administration, where she fought to ensure that all Americans had equal 
        employment rights regardless of age, race, or sex;
Whereas Ms. Dunnigan was a member of Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority, Incorporated; and
Whereas Ms. Dunnigan demonstrated an extraordinary commitment to journalism, the 
        truth, and equality for all Americans: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives commends Alice Allison 
Dunnigan for her barrier-breaking career in journalism.
                                 <all>
```