alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 125 (Wednesday, July 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15502]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD


Meetings

AGENCY: Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board 
(Access Board) plans to hold its regular committee and Board meetings 
in Arlington, VA, Wednesday through Friday, July 15-17, 2009, at the 
times and location noted below.

DATES: The schedule of events is as follows:

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

    9:30-Noon Planning and Evaluation Committee (Closed to Public).
    1:30-3 p.m. Technical Programs Committee.
    3-4 Budget Committee.

Thursday, July 16, 2009

    9:30-5 p.m. Ad Hoc Committee Meetings (Closed to Public).

Friday, July 17, 2009

    9:30-Noon Committee of the Whole: Board structure discussion.
    1:30-3 p.m. Board Meeting.

ADDRESSES: All meetings will be held at the Westin Arlington Gateway 
Hotel, 801 North Glebe Road, Arlington, VA 22203.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information regarding the 
meetings, please contact David Capozzi, Executive Director, (202) 272-
0010 (voice) and (202) 272-0082 (TTY).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At the Board meeting scheduled on Friday, 
July 17, the Access Board will consider the following agenda items:
    <bullet> Election of Vice Chairs for Standing Committees
    <bullet> Approval of the draft March 2009 Board Meeting Minutes
    <bullet> Technical Programs Committee Report
    <bullet> Budget Committee Report
    <bullet> Planning and Evaluation Committee Report
    <bullet> Accessible Design in Education
    <bullet> Acoustics
    <bullet> Airport Terminal Access
    <bullet> Emergency Transportable Housing
    <bullet> Information and Communications Technologies
    <bullet> Outdoor Developed Areas
    <bullet> Passenger Vessels
    <bullet> Public Rights-of-Way
    <bullet> Transportation Vehicles
    <bullet> Election Assistance Commission Report
    <bullet> Executive Director's Report
    <bullet> ADA and ABA Guidelines; Federal Agency Updates
    All meetings are accessible to persons with disabilities. An 
assistive listening system, computer assisted real-time transcription 
(CART), and sign language interpreters will be available at the Board 
meeting. Persons attending Board meetings are requested to refrain from 
using perfume, cologne, and other fragrances for the comfort of other 
participants.

David M. Capozzi,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. E9-15502 Filed 6-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8150-01-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00856-CV

R. R. and A. C., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 340TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

NO. C-23-0001-CPS, THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH WATKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00069-CV

A. C., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 340TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

NO. C230001CPS, THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH WATKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellants R.R. (Father) and A.C. (Mother) each filed a notice of appeal from the 

trial court’s oral ruling on December 13, 2023, terminating their parental rights to their child. 
2

The trial court subsequently entered a written final termination order on January 2, 2024, 

consistent with its previous oral ruling. Mother then filed a second notice of appeal from that 

written order.

On this Court’s own motion, we consolidate for all purposes the appeal in cause 

number 03-24-00069-CV with the appeal in cause number 03-23-00856-CV. Accordingly, all 

records and documents filed in cause number 03-24-00069-CV are consolidated into cause 

number 03-23-00856-CV. The consolidated appeal shall proceed under cause number 

03-23-00856-CV, and cause number 03-24-00069-CV is hereby dismissed. See Guyaux 

v. Walnut Springs Homeowners Ass’n, Inc., No. 03-20-00584-CV, 2021 WL 162503, at *1 (Tex. 

App.—Austin Jan. 5, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op.).

__________________________________________

Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Smith and Theofanis

03-24-00069-CV Dismissed

03-23-00856-CV Consolidated

Filed: February 21, 2024
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00231-CR

JARVIS DEMOAN FISHER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court No. F14-53102-T

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Our review of the court reporter’s and clerk’s records in this case indicates that both 

records contain “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home 

address, and the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” 

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(3). Both records include the names of persons who were minors at the 

time the offense was committed. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an 

electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain 

sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(f) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper 

form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(f). Therefore, because the court 

reporter’s and clerk’s records contain sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her 

appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(f), to seal the electronically filed reporter’s record and 

clerk’s record in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: July 20, 2015
7/7/2015 2:35:58 PM

Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris County

Envelope No. 5963722

By: Phyllis Washington

Filed: 7/7/2015 2:35:58 PM

CAUSE NO. 2014-55440 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS 

113TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

GROSSE TETE WELL SERVICE, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SWIVEL RENTAL & SUPPLY, LLC, 

Defendant. 

PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF APPEAL 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THIS COURT: 

NOW COMES Plaintiff, Grosse Tete Well Service, Inc., and hereby gives notice of 

its desire to take an appeal from the trial court's 06-08-2015 "Amended Order Granting 

Venue Challenge" in favor of Defendant, Swivel Rental & Supply, LLC. Pursuant to 

Rule 25.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff, Grosse Tete Well Service, 

Inc., would respectfully state as follows: 

( 1) This case is currently pending before the Honorable Michael Landrum 

of the 113th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, under 

Cause No. 2014-55440, which is styled Grosse Tete Well Service, Inc. 

vs. Swivel Rental & Supply, LLC. 

(2) The order/judgment appealed from was signed on June 8, 2015. A copy 

of the order/judgment appealed from is attached hereto as Exhibit "1." 

ACCEPTED

14-15-00604-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/15/2015 9:48:53 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/15/2015 9:48:53 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
(3) The party desiring to appeal is: 

(a) Grosse Tete Well Service, Inc. 

( 4) This appeal is to either the Court of Appeals for the First District of 

Texas or the Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth District of Texas. 

(5) This Notice of Appeal is hereby filed by and on behalf of Plaintiff, 

Grosse Tete Well Service, Inc. 

Pursuant to, among other things, Rule 25.l(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure, this Notice of Appeal is being filed with the trial court clerk, filed with the 

appellate court clerk(s) and served on all parties to the trial court proceedings. 

Respectfully submitted, 

JOHANSON & FAIRLESS, L.L.P. 

By: 

, #240332 

1456 First o ony Blvd. 

SugarLand,Texas77479 

(281) 313-5000 

Fax: (281) 340-5100 

cvolf@jandflaw.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

GROSSE TETE WELL SERVICE, INC. 

-2-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, CHRISM. VOLF, do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and 

foregoing instrument has been forwarded to the following attorneys of record/persons by 

mailing same by certified mail (return receipt requested), e-service and/or by facsimile on 

this 7th day of July, 2015: 

Barrie J. Beer 

Amber R. Dunten 

MARTIN, DISIERE, JEFFERSON & WISDOM, 

L.L.P. 

808 Travis Street, 20th Floor 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Christopher A. Prine 

Clerk, First/Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

First/Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

301 Fannin Street 

Houston, Texas 77002-2066 

-3-

John H. Hughes 

ALLEN & GOOCH 

2000 Kaliste Saloom Rd. , Ste. 400 

Lafayette, Louisiana 70508
#### Pamela B. Rodman, Appellant, v Robert H. Friedman, Respondent.

[826 NYS2d 1]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jacqueline W. Silbermann, J.), entered April 24, 2006, which, inter alia, found plaintiff mother had alienated the child from defendant father, set a schedule for future self-executing fines against plaintiff for any possible violations of court orders, and ordered her to pay defendant $10,000 in counsel fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court, which has presided over this matter since 1999, properly exercised its discretion in considering the best interests of the child by declining to hold plaintiff in contempt and in instead imposing fines should she fail again to abide by the court’s orders regarding visitation and therapy *(see Matter of Pignataro v Davis,*8 AD3d 487 [2004]). The court also properly exercised its discretion in ordering plaintiff to pay defendant’s legal fees incurred as a result of her failure to abide by prior *401orders (Domestic Relations Law § 237 [b]; *see State of New York ex rel. Gerstein v Gerstein,*302 AD2d 447 [2003]).

Contrary to plaintiffs contentions, no hearing was required where the court had sufficient information with which to make a comprehensive, independent review of the best interests of the child *(Matter of Glenn v Glenn,*262 AD2d 885, 887 [1999], *lv denied*94 NY2d 782 [1999]). The court based its finding that the mother had alienated the child from the father not simply on the forensic report, but also on its in camera interview with the child, another forensic report, and numerous documents, interviews and court appearances.

Plaintiffs remaining contentions are unavailing. Concur— Andrias, J.P, Nardelli, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20748 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE ANTONIO DIMAS-SALGADO, also known as Vicente Dimas, also known as Vicente Dimas Salgado, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-154-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Antonio Dimas-Salgado appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry into the United States. He argues that the felony and aggravated felony provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). His constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Dimas-Salgado contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and thatNo. 05-20748 -2- a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi , we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Dimas-Salgado properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. Because Dimas-Salgado has shown no error in the judgment of the district court, that judgment is AFFIRMED.
#### CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS CORPORATION OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Defendants, and Everts’ Commercial Transport, Inc., Pacific Truck Service, Inc., Asbury Transportation Co., Acme Transportation, Inc., and Inland Transportation Co., Inc., Intervening Defendants.

No. 42256.

United States District Court N. D. California, S. D.

Dec. 7, 1964.

W. J. Hickey, San Francisco, Cal., and Wm. B. Adams, Portland, Or., for plaintiff.

Francis A. Silver and Wm. L. Harrison, I. C. C., Washington, D. C., for defendants.

Marshall G. Berol, San Francisco, Cal., Earle Y. White, Portland, Or., for intervening defendants.

Before BONE, Circuit Judge, and WOLLENBERG and BURKE, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff seeks to have this Court set aside and annul two orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission dated respectively July 27, 1959 and August 15, 1963. It argues that the determination by the Commission that it could no longer *392transport chemicals derived from petroleum “was arbitrary, capricious and constituted a partial revocation of plaintiff’s authority contrary to the applicable law.”

After a careful review of the record herein this Court has concluded that it cannot agree with plaintiff. Plaintiff’s authority was to transport general commodities “except liquid petroleum products, in bulk, in tank trucks.” Plaintiff has not established that the exception contains a patent ambiguity, that there was any uncertainty as to its meaning when it was formulated nor that the words have á specialized usage in the trade.

The plain meaning of the words, including various dictionary and professional reference definitions, includes petrochemicals. Prior to the issuance of plaintiff’s authority the Commission had devoted much thought to the relevant terminology. See Classification of Motor Carriers of Property, 2 M.C.C. 703. The evidence presented by plaintiff to establish that in the trade the exception was interpreted to exclude petrochemicals, was considered and rejected by the Commission. There was substantial other evidence in the record to sustain the finding of the Commission and under such circumstances it is not within the province of this Court to upset such a finding.

 The Commission’s determination that plaintiff must cease transporting chemicals derived from petroleum was therefore clearly not arbitrary or capricious and did not in any way constitute a partial revocation of plaintiff’s authority. Since plaintiff had never had any authority to transport such petrochemicals its request for modification or extension of its authority was based almost wholly on some sort of prescriptive argument flowing from its transportation of petrochemicals in excess of its authority. In the absence of an effective showing of public convenience and necessity, the denial of additional authority by the Commission was clearly correct.

Accordingly, *the*orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission are affirmed and the complaint is dismissed.
Rail Employer Reporting Instructions

Part II – Establishment of Employee Records

Chapter 3: Multiple Social Security Numbers

1

RRB Notifications

When an employer learns that an employee has more than one social security number, the 

employer should notify...

Compensation and Employer Services

Railroad Retirement Board 

844 North Rush Street 

Chicago, Illinois 60611-1275

Phone: (312) 751-4992

Email: Comp and Employer Services

Items to Include

The correspondence should include:

• the employee's name; 

• employee's address; and 

• all social security numbers used or assigned to employee. 

RRB Action

Upon advice from the Social Security Administration, the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) will 

consolidate the employee's service and compensation under one number. If the discrepancy 

cannot be reconciled, the employer may be asked to file reports of employment. After the 

employee's account is reconciled, the employer will be notified of the social security number to 

be used to report the employee's future service and compensation.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS - principal executive and financial officers**
 
 I, Bill H. Gunn, Chief Executive Officer of AmerAlia, Inc., certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of AmerAlia, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
 
 c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
 
 6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Date: October 13, 2004
 
 
 
 /s/ Bill H. Gunn_________________
 Bill H. Gunn, Chief Executive Officer
 (principal executive officer)
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 02-14-00044-CR OFFENSE: 19.04

Cliff Douglas Parker v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Tarrant

573-/51

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: Criminal District Court No. 2

DATE: 04/16/2015 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 1329800R

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

CliffDouglas Parker v. The State of

STYLE: Texas

APPELLANT^ Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE:

JUDGE:

CCA#: sn&dz

CCA Disposition:

DATE: -

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:_

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
#### Carpenter *v.*The Clinton.1

*(District Court, E. D. New York.*

May 12, 1888.)

Towage—Stranding—N egligence.

On the evidence, *held,*that the grounding of lihelant’s boat was not caused by negligence of the tug, and the libel should therefore be dismissed.

In Admiralty. Libel for damages.

The libel alleged that libelant’s canal-boat, which had been loading at a dock at Eaton’s Neck, L. I., had been taken out into the stream by the propeller Clinton; that in so doing the canal-boat had been run aground by the propeller. The answer averred that the Clinton was taking the canal-boat out carefully, when the propeller herself ran aground; that thereupon a line was passed from the canal-boat to her consort in the stream, and she began to warp the remainder of the distance; but by the negligence of those on the canal-boats the line became fouled, and the boat went ashore. The answer further averred that the propeller’s service was gratuitous.

*Carpenter &*Mosher, for libelant.

*Jas. P. Albright, (F. A. Wilcox,*advocate,) for claimant.

1

 Reported by Edward G-. Benedict, Esq., of the New York bar.

Benedict, J.

I am unable to conclude from the evidence in this case that the grounding of the libelant’s canal-boat was caused by negligence in the management of the tug proceeded against. The libel must therefore be dismissed, and with costs.
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Concerto Software, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Provenzano III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
periods covered in the Report.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/    MICHAEL J. PROVENZANO III |  | March 28, 2003
|-------------------------------- |  | --------------

Michael J. Provenzano III, Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.