T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M ARLE NE SUYA PA VELASQUEZ B ON I L L A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 73900 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 740- 876 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2012** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M ar l e ne S uy apaV e l a s que z B oni l l a , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons pr o s e f orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rdi s m i s s i ng her app ea l fr om an i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s ( “ IJ ”) order denyi ng her m ot i on t o reopen 

# FI LED DE C 28 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 73900 2 r e mo v a l p r o c e e d i n g s c o n du c t e di n ab s e n t i a . W e h av e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r8 U . S. C. § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f

o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n . Mo h a m m e d

v . G o n z a les , 400 F . 3d 785, 791- 92 ( 9th C i r . 2005) . W e de nythe p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T he agency di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng as un t i m el y V el as qu ez B oni l l a ’ s m ot i on t o r e ope n a l l e gi ng e xc e pt i ona l c i r c um s t anc e s , w he r e i tw a s not s ub m itte dw ith in 1 8 0 d ay s o f th e I J ’s F e b ru ary2 , 2 0 1 1 , o r d e r , se e 8 C. F. R. § 1 00 3. 23 (b)( 4)(i i ) ( an al i en se eki ng t o reopen and re sc i nd an i n absent i a r em ov al order bas ed on exce pt i on alci rc um st ance s m ustfi l e the m ot i on w i thi n 1 80 days ), and s he f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h tha ts he qua l i f i e d f ore qui t abl e t ol l i ng of

the f i l i ng d e a d lin e , s e e A v a g

y a n v . H o lde r, 6 4 6 F .3 d6 7 3 , 6 7 8 - 8 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 1 ) . V el asqu ez B o n i l l a receivedp ro p er n o t i ce o f h er rem o v al h eari n g b ecau se s h e w a s p e r s o n a llys e rv e daN o tic e to A p p e ar , se e 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 9 ( a ) ; see a l so Flo r es - Ch a v ezv . A s h c r o ft , 36 2 F . 3d 11 50 , 11 56 n. 4 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( “ C urre ntl aw do es no tre qu i re thatthe N ot i ce t o A pp ear . . . be i n any l angu age other than E ngl i s h. ” ) , and the he ar i ng not i c e w a s m a i l e d t o the m os tr e c e nta ddr e s s s he p r o v id e d , se e 8 U . S . C . §§ 12 29 (c ), 12 29 a( b)(5)( A ).11- 73900 3 V el as qu ez B on i l l a’ s c on t ent i on that , i n m aki ng i t s dec i si on , the agency f a ile dto c o n s id e ra ll th e r e le v an t f a c to r s , is n o t s up p o rte db yth e r e c o r d . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.