alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed July 09, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00467-CR

____________

MALCOLM JEROME ELLIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1421961

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due July 06, 2015. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Arlene Webb, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Middle Kingdom Alliance Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q, for the three
month period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Fred A. Brasch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Fred A. Brasch     
|Fred A. Brasch         
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|May 15, 2008
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Interim Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officer of Sharper Image Corporation, a Delaware corporation (Sharper Image), does hereby certify that:



| | a) | The Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006 (Amendment No. 1) of Sharper Image fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b) | The information contained in Amendment No. 1 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Sharper Image.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                
|--- |  | -------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Daniel W. Nelson           
|    |  | Daniel W. Nelson               
|    |  | Senior Vice President          
|    |  | Interim Chief Financial Officer
|    |  | March 1, 2007
exh10-58.htm










Exhibit 10.58




 


June 27, 2012


 


Yuejian "James" Wang


17815 Cadena Drive


Boca Raton, Fl 33496







Dear Dr. Wang,


 


As a cost cutting measure in order to conserve our cash resources, you hereby agree that CD International Enterprises, Inc. (“CDII”) will issue to you certain amounts of the company's common stock (OTCQB: CDII), or common stock of CDII’s clients such as China Education International, Inc. (OTCBB: CEII), Big Tree Toys (OTC QB: TNSX), Sunwin Stevia International, Inc. (OTCQB: SUWN), Dragon Capital Group Corporation (OTC: DRGV), China Logistics Group, Inc. (OTCBB: CHLO), Linkwell Corporation, and Ziyang Ceramics Corporation (OTCQB: ZYCI) up to 4.99% of each client’s outstanding shares.


 


According to your employment agreement dated August 7, 2008 your monthly salary for calendar year 2012 will be paid at a rate $50,000 per month equating to $600,000 per annum , and for calendar year 2013 at a rate of $54,166.66 per month equating to $650,000 per annum.


 


You have agreed to accept a decrease in pay for the last 6 months of 2012 (July, August, September, October, November and December) of $20,000 per month and have accrued $120,000 during that time frame which will entitle you to $120,000 in company or client company shares.


 


For calendar year 2013 you have further decreased your salary to $20,000 per month and shall receive $34,166.66 per month in shares of CD International Enterprises, Inc. or the shares of CD Internationals client companies equating to $34,166.66 per month.


 


 The value of each stock will be determined at the date when these shares are issued to you, representing value in salary reduction in lieu of cash compensation during the months of the calendar year of 2013.  This compensation is equivalent to $34,167 per month or $410,000 in total.  This $34,167 will be deducted from your monthly salary and the company will pay you during the calendar year of 2013 cash in the amount of $20,000 per month. This change will not affect our regular RSA plan for each employee.


 



 



	
Sincerely,  


 


 


 


 


 


 


/s/ Andrew Goldrich


Andrew Goldrich


Vice President- Operations   

	
Accepted


 


 


 


 


 


 


/s/ James Wang


James Wang


CEO- President
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF                2002**

     In connection with the                Quarterly Report of LILM, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended                September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the                date hereof (the "Report"), I, George I. Norman, III, Chief Executive Officer of                the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.                906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial                condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/**George I. Norman,                III**

**George I. Norman, III**

Chief                Executive Officer

October 17,                2007

A signed original of this written statement                required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or                otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic                version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be                retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or                its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's                Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States                Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure                document.

----
County of Guadalupe and 

Randall R

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 13, 2015

No. 04-15-00279-CV

Abdul H. NUBANI,

Appellant

v.

COUNTY OF GUADALUPE and Randall R. Smidt,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-2202-CV

The Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion to Extend Order Abating Appellate Deadlines Pending 

Settlement is GRANTED. The appellate deadlines are abated until July 31, 2015.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**ESCO,
      INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION**




**1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**




**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ESCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William T. Foley,
      President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ William T. FoleyWilliam
              T. FoleyPresident and Chief Financial
              OfficerMay
                15, 2007


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      ESCO, Inc. and will be retained by ESCO, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<Page>

                                                               EXHIBIT 10.42(b)

                     FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



This First Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of
January 24, 2001, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
("Employer") and William Naylon ("Executive").

                                    RECITALS

A)   On February 1, 2000 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by
     and between Employer and Executive.

B)   Employer and Executive now desire to amend the Employment Agreement, as set
     forth hereinbelow:

                                    AGREEMENT

1.   Section 3.1 of the Agreement which provides:

     3.1  TERM. The term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence on
          February 1, 2000 and shall continue until March 31, 2001 unless sooner
          terminated or extended as hereinafter provided.

      is hereby amended, effective January 24, 2001, to provide as follows:

     3.1  TERM. The term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence on
          February 1, 2000 and shall continue until March 31, 2002 unless sooner
          terminated or extended as hereinafter provided.

2.   All other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain unaltered and
     fully effective.

     //
     //
     //
     //
     //
     //
     //
     //

<Page>

Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.




EXECUTIVE                                                 EMPLOYER
---------                                                 --------

                                                     PRICESMART, INC.

William Naylon                                       By: /s/ GILBERT A. PARTIDA
                                                         ----------------------

/s/ WILLIAM NAYLON                                   Name:   GILBERT A. PARTIDA
------------------                                           ------------------

                                                     Its:    PRESIDENT/CEO
                                                             -------------------
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited (Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), Benjamin G. Wolff, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer) and Timothy P. Leybold, Interim Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                          |  |  |  |                                                                                                                       
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/     BENJAMIN G. WOLFF                                                                                                 |  |  |  | /s/    TIMOTHY P. LEYBOLD                                                                                             
|                                                                                                                          |  | 
|Benjamin G. Wolff Chairman
of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer) |  |  |  | Timothy P. Leybold Interim
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)
|                                                                                                                          |  | 
|May 6, 2011                                                                                                               |  |  |  | May 6, 2011                                                                                                           

A signed original of
this written statement has been provided to ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited and will be retained by ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 22, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 22, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0253. DARREN T. CENSULLO v. BONNIE L. CENSULLO. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2015V0090
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Terrance Wood, Respondent.

[976 NYS2d 879]

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Michael A. Gross, J.), rendered September 28, 2012, resentencing defendant to a term of 13 years plus five years’ postrelease supervision, and bringing up for review an order of the same court and Justice, entered on or about June 1, 2012, which granted defendant’s CPL 440.20 motion to set aside his sentence as a second violent felony offender and directed that he be resentenced as a first violent felony offender, and an order, entered on or about July 23, 2012, which, upon reargument, adhered to the June 1, 2012 order, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion denied, and the matter remanded for resentencing.

Pursuant to *People v Boyer*(22 NY3d 15 [2013]), the original date of a conviction is controlling for purposes of determining the sequence of current and prior convictions, not the date of resentencing to correct the error identified in *People v Sparber*(10 NY3d 457 [2008]). Because the date defendant received a lawful sentence on a valid conviction for criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree precedes the date of conviction for the instant offense, it qualifies as a prior felony conviction. Concur — Tom, J.P, Andrias, Friedman, Freedman and Clark, JJ.
CL-T7A

SAMPLE ates

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
Office of Programs
Policy and Systems
844 North Rush Street
Chicago, Illinois 60611-1275
Fax No. (312) 751-7123

BA NO, 8444 Payroll ID No. 0123456789

REPORTED FOR YEAR SM RUIA 1 RUIA 2 TIER 1 COMP = TIER 2 COMP
2011 12 $ 15,960.00 § 20,287.80 $ 61,387.28 $ 61,387.28

SSN NAME

123-45-6789 Railroader Bob

Service and compensation reported for the above employee cannot be credited because
the name you reported for this account does not agree with the name established in
our records.

Please review your records and complete items 1, 2, and 3 listed below. If the
employee ts a married female, also complete item 4.

Return this letter to the address shown above,

1, Employee's Social Security Number,

2. Employee's Full Name:
3. Employee's Mailing Address:

Street

City, State, and Zip Code
4 Female Employee's Maiden or Previous Name:

Chief of Compensation
and Employer Services
Exhibit 14.1







Policy on Ethics and Business Conduct





The management and employees of Exten Industries, Inc., and its subsidiary companies, are committed to always doing the right thing. This is why we have an ethics and compliance program and why we publish this Code. The Code is specifically designated to be a part of an effective program to prevent and detect violations of law and moral values.



The values embodied in the Exten Industries, Inc. Code of Ethics are meant to guide the business decisions of our organization. The Code of Ethics tells us that, as a company, we should strive to be trustworthy, to respect all people, to be responsible to our constituents and publics, fair in our dealings, caring of the people we affect and good citizens.



This Code of Ethics will apply to all officers, directors and employees of the Company.





Code of Ethics



It is the fundamental responsibility of all employees to adhere to the following principles:



1. We will always be honest and truthful.
2. We will adhere to the letter and the spirit of all applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations.
3. We will handle all actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships in an ethical manner.
4. All public filings will contain full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure.
5. All public communications will include full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure.
6. All employees will promptly report to the Board of Directors any violations of this Code.
7. We will protect employees who report violations of this code from unfair and undo repercussion by those accused.
8. All employees will be held accountable for adherence to this Code.
9. We will promote and sustain a work environment that fosters mutual respect, openness and individual integrity.
10. We will provide high quality products and services.



Adopted by the Board of Directors of Exten Industries, Inc. November 13, 2003.







W. Gerald Newmin
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



- 16 -
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 73 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 73

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 24, 2019.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on the Budget: Mr. Moulton, Mr. Jeffries, Mr. Khanna, Ms. DeLauro, 
Mr. Doggett, Mr. Price of North Carolina, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Higgins of New 
York, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. Panetta, Mr. 
Morelle, Mr. Horsford, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Ms. Jackson Lee, Ms. Lee of 
California, Ms. Jayapal, and Ms. Omar.
    Committee on Education and Labor: Mrs. Trahan and Mr. Castro of Texas.
    Committee on Natural Resources: Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Costa, Mr. Sablan, Mr. 
Huffman, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. Gallego, Mr. Cox of California, Mr. Neguse, Mr. 
Levin of California, Ms. Haaland, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. Cunningham, Ms. Velazquez, 
Ms. DeGette, Mr. Clay, Mrs. Dingell, Mr. Brown of Maryland, Mr. McEachin, Mr. 
Soto, Mr. Case, Mr. Horsford, and Mr. San Nicolas.
    Committee on Science, Space, and Technology: Mr. Cohen (to rank immediately 
after Mr. Sherman).
    Committee on Small Business: Ms. Finkenauer, Mr. Golden, Mr. Kim, Mr. Crow, 
Ms. Davids of Kansas, Ms. Judy Chu of California, Mr. Veasey, Mr. Evans, Mr. 
Schneider, Mr. Espaillat, Mr. Delgado, and Ms. Houlahan.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Smith Desnoyer, Also Known as Desnoyer Smith, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 58]

*298The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility.

The court properly denied defendant’s request to submit the lesser included offense of petit larceny, since there was no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed most favorably to defendant, that he stole the victim’s wallet, but that the wallet did not contain any credit cards *(see People v Negron,*91 NY2d 788 [1998]).

The court properly denied defendant’s mistrial motion (the only remedy requested), made after a detective testified that he observed defendant going into and out of bars and restaurants on the night before he was arrested for jostling, and several weeks after the events resulting in the grand larceny charges. There is nothing illegal or immoral, as such, about such activity, regardless of whether it may raise a suspicion of casing-type behavior. Therefore, this testimony did not constitute evidence of uncharged crimes or prior bad acts *(see e.g. People v Jones,*293 AD2d 489 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 652 [2002]; *People v Mateen,*227 AD2d 350 [1996], *lv denied*88 NY2d 989 [1996]). Furthermore, it provided relevant background information, completing the narrative of events leading up to defendant’s arrest. In any event, even assuming that this testimony could be considered evidence of prior bad acts, its probative value exceeded its prejudicial effect. We also note that the court offered to deliver a limiting instruction, which defendant declined. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Gonzalez and Acosta, JJ.
#### In the Matter of RCN Telecom Services of New York, LP, et al., Appellants, v David M. Frankel et al., Respondents.

Submitted April 29, 2013;

decided June 25, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution and is not an order of the type provided for in CPLR 5602 (a) (2).