alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

CDM/Filanc JV 

Under Contract No. N62473-10-C-5011 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59494 

J. Kent Holland, Jr., Esq. 

William B. Fisher, Esq. 

ConstructionRisk Counsel, PLLC 

Vienna, VA 

Ronald J. Barro, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

Genifer M. Tarkowski, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Appellant has requested that it be permitted to withdraw the referenced appeal. 

Appellant states that it "understands that this will effectively constitute a voluntary 

dismissal with prejudice". The government does not oppose the request. Accordingly, 

the appeal is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 21 July 2015 

BERT T. PEACOCK 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59494, Appeal of CDM/Filanc JV, 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
S05Y0654.

#### IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT B. ELLIS, JR.

(608 SE2d 225)

Decided January 24, 2005.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, K. Gene Chapman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*J. Converse Bright,*for Ellis.

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the Petition for Voluntary Surrender of License filed by Respondent Robert B. Ellis, Jr., prior to the issuance of a formal complaint and pursuant to Bar Rule 4-227 (b). A voluntary surrender of license is tantamount to disbarment. Bar Rule 4-110 (f). In his petition, Ellis admits that in August 2004 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Valdosta Division, he pled guilty to violating 18 USC § 1001, a felony involving giving false statements, and that by his felony conviction, he violated Rule 8.4 (a) (2) of Rule 4-102 (d) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct. A violation of Rule 8.4 (a) (2) is punishable by disbarment. The State Bar recommends that this Court accept Ellis’s petition.

Having reviewed the record, we agree with the State Bar that Ellis’s Petition for Voluntary Surrender of License, which is tantamount to disbarment pursuant to Bar Rule 4-110 (f), should be accepted. Accordingly, the name of Robert B. Ellis, Jr. is hereby removed from the rolls of persons entitled to practice law in the State of Georgia. Ellis is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Petition for voluntary surrender of license accepted.*

*All the Justices concur.*
NUMBER 13-15-00331-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

IN RE KRISTIN BOWLING

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and

Writ of Prohibition.

ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Relator, Kristin Bowling, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and writ of prohibition 

on July 17, 2015, through which she contends that the trial court lacks jurisdiction to 

intervene in a criminal case that has not been indicted. She seeks to compel the trial 

court to vacate its order denying relator’s plea to the jurisdiction and to retract a warrant 

for relator’s arrest. This original proceeding arises from trial court cause number 14-AC0465 in the 105th District Court of Kleberg County. A separate appeal from that same 
2

trial court cause number has been docketed in our appellate cause number 13-15-00299-

CR. The Court requests the real party in interest, the State of Texas, acting by and 

through the District Attorney for Kleberg County, Texas, to file a response to the petition 

for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from today’s date. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 52.8(b). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

20th day of July, 2015.
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Porter Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) for the annual period
ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David B. Pierce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                      |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                       |  | PORTER BANCORP, INC.
|                       |  |                     
|Dated: August 16, 2010 |  | By:                  |  | /s/ David B. Pierce    
|                       |  |                      |  | David B. Pierce        
|                       |  |                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Relly Adler, Appellant, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

Submitted December 17, 2012;

decided February 19, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the proceeding and the motion have abated because of the death of the appellant.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K/A





CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of report (Date of earliest event reported) June 5th, 2007

--------------

HIGH END VENTURES, INC.

(Name of Small Business issuer in its charter)





COLORAD0333-13391620-343739 1

(State or other jurisdiction of            (Commission File No.)    (IRS Employer

incorporation or organization)                                                 Identification No.)





|1066 West Hastings Street, Suite 2610, Vancouver, BC v6e 3x2
|------------------------------------------------------------
|Vancouver, British Columbia                                 
|Canada                                           T2H 2K6    

(Address of principal executive offices)



(604)602-1717

(Registrants telephone number)

-------------------------







Item 8 01. Other Events



Nadir Walji of Vancouver, BC is appointed to the Board of Directors to serve until the next annual meeting and is herby elected CEO, President, Secretary/Treasurer of the corporation and its Chief Accounting Officer. Thomas Forzani resigned as of 5 pm Eastern time on June 5, 2007



A copy of the minutes of the meeting is including in this document as Exhibit 99.1



ITEM 9.01. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.





EXHIBITS



99.1

Board Minutes  June 5,2007





SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



June 5 /2007



HIGH END VENTURES, INC.







/s/Nadir Walji

Nadir Walji,  CEO, President   and Secretary/Treasurer







Exhibit 99.1



Board of Directors Minutes



MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

OF

HIGH END VENTURES, INC.

June 5th, 2007



A telephone meeting of the Board of Directors of High End Ventures Inc. (the Corporation), was held on June 5, 2007 at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time.



Directors participating in the meeting were:





Thomas Forzani and Nadir Walji



The Board unanimously resolved the following:



RESOLVED:

That Nadir Walji of Vancouver, BC be appointed to the Board of Directors to serve until the next annual meeting and is herby elected CEO, President, Secretary/Treasurer of the corporation and its Chief Accounting Officer.



Thomas Forzani resigned as of 5 pm Eastern time on June 5, 2007



There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.





/s/ Nadir Walji/s/ Thomas Forzani

Nadir Walji, Secretary

Nadir Walji,  President and Chairman of the Board



June 5th,  2007
Exhibit 11.1
<TABLE>
                            SHARPER IMAGE CORPORATION

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<CAPTION>

Net Earnings (Loss) in thousands

                                                Net             Weighted Average        Per-Share
                                          Earnings (Loss)            Shares               Amount
                                          ----------------      ----------------        ----------
<S>                                       <C>                          <C>              <C>
Fiscal year ended January 31, 1998:
   Basic                                  $          593               8,303,425        $     0.07
                                                                                        ==========
      Effect of dilutive stock options    $          -                   233,607
                                          ----------------      ----------------
   Diluted                                $          593               8,537,032        $     0.07
                                          ================      ================        ==========


Fiscal year ended January 31, 1997:
   Basic                                  $       (4,345)              8,260,208        $    (0.53)
                                                                                        ==========
   Diluted                                $       (4,345)              8,260,208        $    (0.53)
                                          ================      ================        ==========


Fiscal year ended January 31, 1996:
   Basic                                  $          444               8,249,259        $     0.05
                                                                                        ==========
      Effect of dilutive stock options    $          -                   432,819
                                          ----------------      ----------------
   Diluted                                $          444               8,682,078        $     0.05
                                          ================      ================        ==========
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 24**

 

OWENS-ILLINOIS GROUP, INC.POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That each individual whose signature appears belowhereby consents to and appoints James W. Baehren as his true and lawfulattorney-in-fact and agent with all power of substitution, for him and in hisname, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the 2005 AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Owens-Illinois Group, Inc., a corporationorganized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, and any and allamendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and alldocuments in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commissionpursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, grantingunto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and performeach and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and aboutthe same as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do inperson, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact andagent or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done byvirtue thereof.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has hereunto set his hand on the dateset opposite his name.

 
| **Signature**             | ** ** | **Title**                                                         | ** ** | **Date**            |
|---------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------|
|                      |       |                                                              |       |                |
| /s/ Matthew G. Longthorne |       | Director                                                          |       | March 16, 2006 |
| Matthew G. Longthorne     |       |                                                              |       |                |
|                      |       |                                                              |       |                |
| /s/ Steven R. McCracken   |       | Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer                             |       | March 16, 2006 |
| Steven R. McCracken       |       | (Principal Executive  Officer)                                    |       |                |
|                      |       |                                                              |       |                |
| /s/ Edward C. White       |       | President (Principal  Financial and accounting Officer); Director |       | March 16, 2006 |
| Edward C. White           |       |                                                              |       |                |
|                      |       |                                                              |       |                |
| /s/ James W. Baehren      |       | Vice President and  Secretary; Director                           |       | March 16, 2006 |
| James W. Baehren          |       |                                                              |       |                |

 

----
@conference{1211246,
  author = {Ran Tao and Sukrut Prashant Phansalkar and Aaron M. Forster and Bongtae Han},
  title = {Investigation of Cure Kinetics of Advanced Epoxy Molding Compound Using Dynamic Heating Scan: An Overlooked Second Reaction},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-08-03 04:08:00},
  publisher = {2023 IEEE 73rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), Orlando, FL, US},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936408},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC51909.2023.00225},
  language = {en},
}
@misc{1210136,
  author = {Alexander Maranghides and Eric Link and Christopher U. Brown and William D. Walton and William Mell and Steven Hawks},
  title = {A Case Study of the Camp Fire - Notification, Evacuation, Traffic, and Temporary Refuge Areas (NETTRA)},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-07-18 04:07:00},
  publisher = {Technical Note (NIST TN), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936322},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.2252},
  language = {en},
}
# Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

## Overview

In 2015, NINDS and the Tuberous Sclerosis Alliance sponsored a workshop to assess progress and new opportunities for research in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) with the goal of updating the 2003 Research Plan for Tuberous Sclerosis. Additional participants included representatives from six other NIH Institutes, the Department of Defense Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research Program, scientists and clinicians with expertise in TSC, and representatives from the pharmaceutical industry. Premeeting deliberation and workshop sessions focused on progress in the field since the 2003 research plan; gaps, needs, and challenges for TSC research; and new research priorities and recommendations for addressing major challenges in each priority area. The updated research plan is organized around both short-term and long-term goals with the expectation that progress toward specific objectives can be achieved within five to ten years.

#### Research Plans 

              - Publication:  Advances and Future Directions for Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research: Recommendations From the 2015 Strategic Planning Conference
              - 2003 Research Plan for Tuberous Sclerosis 

> 
Resources and Tools

NINDS Tuberous Sclerosis Information page

Mind Your Risks
#### Geoffrey Bond et al., Respondents, v Thomas A. Turner et al., Appellants, and Village of Lakewood, Respondent.

Submitted December 24, 2012;

decided February 7, 2013

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*20 NY3d 904 (2012)].
@article{1208006,
  author = {Matthew West and Georges Pavlidis and Robert Montgomery and Fabia Farlin Athena and Muhammad Jamil and Andrea Centrone and Samuel Graham and Eric Vogel},
  title = {Thermal environment impact on HfOx RRAM operation: A nanoscale thermometry and modeling study},
  year = {2023},
  number = {133},
  month = {2023-05-08 04:05:00},
  publisher = {Journal of Applied Physics},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=935645},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0145201},
  language = {en},
}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5

<S>                                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                    JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                      DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                                                    329
<SECURITIES>                                                          139,912
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          15,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      314,814
<PP&E>                                                                 18,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                                          9,424
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        358,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 183,838
<BONDS>                                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                                4,401
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                                            169,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          358,700
<SALES>                                                               104,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      104,749
<CGS>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         520,160
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     17,831
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      (433,242)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          (79,100)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  (354,142)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         (510,851)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                              (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                            (.12)



</TABLE>
ACCEPTED

04-14-00513-CR

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

7/20/2015 11:36:02 AM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7/20/2015 11:36:02 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
#### Salvatore BELLA, Plaintiff, v. MARINE TRANSPORT LINES, Inc., Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Jan. 5, 1956.

Eisenberg & Dembo, New York City, for plaintiff.

Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City, for defendant.

SUGARMAN, District Judge.

Defendant Marine Transport Lines, Inc., in an action commenced against it by Salvatore Bella, a seaman, moves to amend its answer by adding two additional defenses, namely, (1) a release without reservation of plaintiff’s rights against defendant given by plaintiff to American Export Lines, Inc., allegedly a joint tort feasor with defendant, and (2) complete satisfaction of plaintiff’s claim against defendant by the alleged, joint tort feasor, American Export Lines, Inc.

The plaintiff had sustained an injury to his shoulder in August, 1951 while in the employ of American Export Lines, Inc. Thereafter in December, 1952, while in movant’s employment, he injured the same shoulder. In August, 1954 plaintiff settled his claim against American Export Lines, Inc. and executed an unconditional general release on payment to him of $5,500 for damages arising from the August, 1951 accident.

Plaintiff commenced the instant action against defendant in September, 1954 to recover damages for his injury in December, 1952.

Defendant contends that the plaintiff and American Export Lines, Inc., considered the aggravation of the injury to plaintiff’s shoulder caused by the incident aboard defendant’s vessel in December, 1952, in settling the claim against American Export Lines, Inc., and payment was made to plaintiff, and his general release was executed, with full knowledge of plaintiff’s rights against movant, but plaintiff failed to reserve those rights.

Plaintiff opposes the granting of this motion on two grounds, (1) delay in seeking the.relief and (2) the lack of causal relationship between the two accidents.

If there was undue delay on defendant’s part in bringing on this motion, plaintiff has not shown that he has been or will be prejudiced thereby.

The dispute between the parties as to the relationship between the injury of August, 1951 and that of December, 1952 and the knowledge and intention of plaintiff and American Export Lines, Inc. when, in August, 1954, they settled the claim arising out of the plaintiff’s first injury in August, 1951 cannot be decided on this motion. They are questions of fact to be determined by the proof adduced at the trial. The defendant, in good faith, seeks to amend its *411answer to plead defenses that will allow that proof to be received.

The mandate of the rule is clear: “[L]eave shall be freely given when justice so requires”.1 Justice requires that'defendant be enabled to plead the additional defenses it moves to add to its answer.

The motion is granted and it is so ordered.

1

. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 15(a), 28 U.S.C.A.