alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofStanley, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterended December 26, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Philip O. Nolan, Chairman,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Brian J. Clark,Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly represents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ PHILIP O. NOLAN                                    |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Philip O. Nolan                                        |   |
| Chairman, President and Chief Executive  Officer       |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)                          |   |
| January 29, 2009                                  |   |
|                                                   |   |
|                                                   |   |
| /s/ BRIAN J. CLARK                                     |   |
| Brian J. Clark                                         |   |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial  Officer and |   |
| Treasurer                                              |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                          |   |
| January 29, 2009                                  |   |

 

----
# table202_all
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      9,704,900
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                 351,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           10,058,100 
<PP&E>                                     43,683,400
<DEPRECIATION>                             11,287,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             42,979,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         611,900
<BONDS>                                    34,822,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  7,328,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               42,979,200
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           17,253,700
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               3,177,400 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              150,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          3,130,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             9,599,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         9,599,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                9,599,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    9.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    9.56
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Stanley, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ending June 27, 2008 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Philip O. Nolan,Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Brian J.Clark, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)             The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)             The informationcontained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  PHILIP O. NOLAN                                   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Philip  O. Nolan                                       |   |
| Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer       |   |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)                         |   |
| August 4,  2008                                   |   |
|                                                   |   |
|                                                   |   |
| /s/  BRIAN J. CLARK                                    |   |
| Brian  J. Clark                                        |   |
| Executive  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and |   |
| Treasurer                                              |   |
| (Principal  Financial Officer)                         |   |
| August 4,  2008                                   |   |

 

----
**Exhibit
      32**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) of
      Sterling Banks, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission, we, Robert H King, President and Chief Executive Officer, and R.
      Scott Horner, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                  Robert H. King
              /s/
                  R. Scott HornerRobert
                  H. King
              R.
                  Scott HornerPresident
                  and Chief Executive Officer
              Executive
                  Vice President and Chief Financial
                  Officer





Date:
      November 14, 2007
#### In the Matter of Orange County Department of Social Services, on Behalf of Misty F.-R, Respondent, v Germel Y., Appellant. (And Another Proceeding.)

Submitted February 11, 2013;

decided March 26, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceedings within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### Jennifer Duncan, Respondent, v 605 Third Avenue, LLC, et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, and Vaughan Carpet, Inc., Appellant. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 592]

*495Due to the plaintiffs medical condition, her deposition was conducted on various dates at her Brooklyn apartment, and each session was of limited duration. At the fourth such session, the court reporter refused to proceed with the transcription of the plaintiffs testimony, due to the allegedly unsanitary condition of the apartment. Shortly thereafter, at a conference before the Supreme Court, the appellants requested an order directing that the plaintiffs deposition be completed at a neutral site approved by her doctors. In an order dated December 15, 2006, the Supreme Court, inter alia, directed instead that the appellants “continue [the] deposition of plaintiff via written interrogatories, as opposed to oral deposition.”

The appellants separately moved to vacate so much of the order dated December 15, 2006, as required them to resort to written interrogatories. The plaintiff opposed the motions on the ground that she was unable to travel outside of her home *496due to her medical condition. During the pendency of the motions, the plaintiff relocated to Sullivan County. In the order appealed from, the Supreme Court denied the appellants’ motions.

Although the plaintiff submitted an unsigned report by a physician indicating that her medical condition requires her to avoid travel outside her home and exposure to other individuals, there is no evidence in the record demonstrating that an oral examination, particularly one conducted via live video conferencing and not requiring the plaintiff to leave her home, “would be so harmful as to seriously endanger [the plaintiffs] physical condition” *(Equitable Lbr. Co. v Northeastern Const. Corp.,*43 AD2d 845 [1974]). The appellants “should not be required to examine the witness by written interrogatories in the absence of a certification by a court-designated physician that oral examination would be harmful to her health” *(Randall v Schwartz,*84 AD2d 525 [1981]; *see Equitable Lbr. Corp. v Northeastern Const. Corp.,*43 AD2d at 845).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the appellants’ respective motions to vacate so much of the order dated December 15, 2006, as limited their disclosure from the plaintiff to written interrogatories. The appellants are entitled to depose the plaintiff, to the extent indicated herein. In the event that the plaintiff is able to show that such an examination would endanger her health, she may move in the Supreme Court for a protective order, which may be granted if supported by the certification of a court-designated physician establishing that an oral examination, including one conducted by means of live video conferencing, would be harmful to the plaintiffs health. Prudenti, P.J., Skelos, Miller, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
June 9, 2015 www.bls.gov

Data Users Advisory Committee (DUAC) Agenda

Kathy Frederickson-Mele • Mele.Kathy@bls.gov • http://www.bls.gov/bls/duac.htm • 202.691.6102

8:30 a.m. Registration 

9:00 a.m. Commissioner’s welcome and review of agency developments (Erica Groshen) 

9:45 a.m. Ethics Briefing (Kathy Mele) 

10:00 a.m. Break 

10:15 a.m. New Data Products in OEUS (Mike Horrigan, Rick Clayton, Andrew Reamer) 

11:15 a.m. Occupational Requirements Survey status and outputs (Renee Marshall, Nicole Dangermond, 

 Kathryn Kobe) 

12:15 p.m. Lunch 

1:15 p.m. Chart packages with news releases (Jay Meisenheimer) 

1:45 p.m. K-12 pages (Tracy Jack, William Wascher) 

 

2:30 p.m. New inputs to PPI industry indexes (Jon Weinhagen, Jayson Pollock, Ken Simonson) 

3:30 p.m. Break 

3:45 p.m. Report on Stakeholder Surveys (Robin Kaplan, Randy Eberts) 

4:45 p.m. Future topics and meeting wrap-up
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15379]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR09-10-002]


Michigan Consolidated Gas Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

June 23, 2009.
    Take notice that on June 12, 2009, Michigan Consolidated Gas 
Company filed an Operating Statement pursuant to section 284.123(e) of 
the Commission's regulations and to comply with the Commission's letter 
order issued on May 21, 2009, in Docket Nos. PR09-10-000 and PR09-10-
001.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a 
protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d99f9c8b9a96b7b5b0b7bc8aaca9a9b6abad99bfbcabbaf7beb6af"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bef8fbecfdf1d0d2d7d0dbedcbceced1cccafed8dbccdd90d9d1c8">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, June 30, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-15379 Filed 6-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - October 2007 

Benefit payments October 2007 October 2006 

Regular Retirement 

and Survivor Benefits 

Total 

Retired employ

Spouses and d

Widow(er)s - a

Other survivors 

ees 

ivorced spouses 

ged and disabled 

$816,851,000 

538,981,000 

98,450,000 

156,574,000 

22,846,000 

$788,356,000 

516,221,000 

93,864,000 

155,903,000 

22,365,000 

Average under 

Being paid Awarded in Social Security 

Monthly benefits end of month month October 2007 

Number Average1 Number Average1 Being Paid Awarded 

Total 574,600 ......... 2,800 ......... ......... .........

Regular employee annuities, total 277,500 $1,929 1,200 $2,587 ......... .........

 Age 193,100 1,895 2 600 2 3,069 $1,052 3 $1,311

 Disability, Full Retirement Age and Over 34,000 1,715 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Disability, Under Full Retirement Age 50,400 2,204 300 2,373 980 1,034 

Spouses and divorced spouses 137,300 711 900 947 504 364 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 133,500 1,169 500 1,533 996 827 

Widowed mothers and fathers 900 1,474 4/ 1,659 763 733 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 14,300 777 100 868 5/ 5/ 

Children 11,100 854 4/ 1,194 687 681 

Other survivors 4/ 810 ......... ......... ......... .........

 Benefit payments 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

October 

2007 

$5,072,000 

October 

2006 

$5,043,000 

Number 

121,300 

Average 

$42 

Number 

700 

Average 

$41 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement. 

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 36); about 300

 other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis. 

4

Fewer than 50. 

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers. 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. 

Regular retirement and survivor benefit payments total includes hospital insurance benefits for services in Canada. 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

October 2007 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Average payment 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period

 Per

 full week 

Unemployment 2,900 $530 $292 

Sickness 6,100 529 

October 2007 

292 

Benefit payments 

October 2006

 Unemployment

Total 

3,459,000 

$8,683,000 $8,851,000 

3,449,000 

Sickness 5,224,000 5,402,000 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited). Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary 

Recycled

 Paper
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kevin Hogge, Chief Financial Officer of CRC Health Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2007                                       
|                                                              
|/s/    KEVIN HOGGE                                            
|Kevin Hogge                                                   
|Chief Financial Officer                                       
|(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CRC
Health Corporation and will be retained by CRC Health Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Charles H. Reed Jr., Respondent, v Jennifer Bernhardt, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 267]

Rose, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Schoharie County (Bartlett, III, J.), entered February 16, 2005, which, inter alia, dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, to modify a prior order of custody.

Upon their divorce in 2000, the parties were granted joint legal custody of their two children (born in 1990 and 1992) with primary physical custody to respondent (hereinafter the mother) and visitation to petitioner (hereinafter the father). In 2004, the father petitioned for sole legal custody of the children based primarily upon his concerns that the children were not achieving their full potential in the home-schooling program conducted by the mother. The mother cross-petitioned for sole custody. Following a fact-finding hearing, which included a *Lincoln*hearing with the children, Family Court found that the father had legitimate concerns about the children’s education, but that it was in their best interests to give the mother exclusive control over the home-schooling program through the current school year. The court also determined to continue joint custody despite the parties’ past lack of cooperation in sharing responsibility for the children’s education. Having resolved the immediate educational dispute in favor of the mother, Family Court expected these par*1161ties to be able to communicate as to other issues concerning the children. The mother now appeals, arguing that Family Court erred in continuing joint custody.*

Upon our review of the record, we are unable to conclude that Family Court’s continuation of joint custody, which obviously resulted from the court’s careful consideration of the issues and recognition that both parties are “very caring and dedicated parents,” is contrary to the children’s best interests. Rather, we find a sound and substantial basis in the record to support the conclusion that the parties’ interaction here has not been “ ‘so acrimonious that they are incapable of putting aside their differences’ ” *(Webster v Webster,*283 AD2d 732, 734 [2001], quoting *Matter of Meres v Botsch,*260 AD2d 757, 759 [1999]; *see Matter of Blanchard v Blanchard,*304 AD2d 1048, 1049 [2003]; *Matter of Burnham v Basta,*241 AJD2d 628, 629 [1997], *lv denied*90 NY2d 812 [1997]). Thus, we decline to disturb it.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

*

 Although the father also asks this Court to modify Family Court’s order and award him sole custody, his failure to cross-appeal precludes our consideration of his request (see *Matter of Alice C. v Bernard G.C.,*193 AD2d 97, 111 [1993]).
ACCEPTED 14-14-00753-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/11/2015 3:59:50 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/22/2015 4:09:02 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10(p)

                           AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                      PEDIATRIC SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC.
                    NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

The Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan of Pediatric Services of America,
Inc. (the "Plan") is hereby amended as follows:

(1) Section 2.4 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following in its stead:

     2.4 Written Election by Participant. Each Key employee designated by the
         -------------------------------
Board as a Participant for a Plan Year shall submit to the Plan Committee a
Written Election within 30 days before or after the first day of the Plan Year
for which he has been designated as a Participant. If a Key Employee will become
a Participant after the first day of a Plan Year, he shall have 30 days before
or after the first day of participation to submit the Written Election. If a
Participant fails to submit a Written Election within 30 days after the Entry
Date on which he became a Participant, he may not participate in the Plan until
the first Entry Date of the next succeeding Plan Year (provided that he
continues to be eligible under Section 2.1).

(2) All other terms and conditions shall remain in effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has amended the Plan on January 27, 2000.

                                           PEDIATRIC SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC.



                                           By:  /s/ Joseph D. Sansone
                                                ------------------------------
                                                    Joseph D. Sansone
                                                    President

                                          By:  /s/ James M. McNeill
                                               ------------------------------
                                                   James M. McNeill
                                                   Secretary
@article{1205971,
  author = {Archita Hati and Craig Nelson},
  title = {A Simple Optimization Method for Generating High-Purity Amplitude and Phase Modulation},
  year = {2022},
  number = {71},
  month = {2022-06-27 04:06:00},
  publisher = {IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=934262},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2022.3186367},
  language = {en},
}