alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT (4)(H)


                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                     CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY FINANCING VI

         The undersigned, constituting all of the trustees of Consumers Energy
Company Financing VI, desiring to form a business trust pursuant to the Delaware
Business Trust Act, 12 Del. C. Section 3801, et seq., hereby certify as follows:

         (a)       Name. The name of the business trust being formed hereby (the
                   "Trust") is "Consumers Energy Company Financing VI."

         (b)       Delaware Trustee. The Name and business address of the
                   trustee of the Trust which has its principal place of
                   business in the State of Delaware are as follows:

                   The Bank of New York (Delaware)
                   White Clay Center, Route 273
                   Newark, Delaware  19711

         (c)       Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
                   as of the date of filing with the Secretary of State of the
                   State of Delaware.

Dated:  November 21, 2001

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the Trustees of the Trust,
have executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first above written.



                                     /s/Alan M. Wright
                                     Alan M. Wright, as Regular Trustee


                                     /s/Thomas A. McNish
                                     Thomas A. McNish, as Regular Trustee


                                     The Bank of New York (Delaware), as
                                              Delaware Trustee

                                     By: /s/William T. Lewis
                                        Name:  William T. Lewis
                                        Title: SVP
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6968

ALBERT SNYDER, Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus
SHIRLEY L. PHELPS-ROPER; REBEKAH A. PHELPS-DAVIS, Defendants - Appellants, and

FRED W. PHELPS, SR.; JOHN DOES; JANE DOES; WESTBORO BAPTIST CHURCH, INCORPORATED, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:06-cv-01389-RDB)
Submitted: October 31, 2007 Decided: December 4, 2007
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shirley L. Phelps-Roper, Rebekah A. Phelps-Davis, Appellants Pro Se. Sean E. Summers, Paul W. Minnich, Rees Griffiths, BARLEY &- 2 - SNYDER, LLC, York, Pennsylvania; Craig T. Trebilcock, SHUMAKER & WILLIAMS, PC, York, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: Rebekah A. Phelps-Davis and Shirley L. Phelps-Roper seek to appeal the district court’s order denying their motion to dismiss or for summary judgment in Appellee’s civil suit. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Phelps-Davis and Phelps-Roper seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We further deny the Appellants’ renewed motion for stay, motion for emergency hearing, and motion for the district court to provide original audio tapes. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18D0002. BRENDA GATES et al. v. TAYLOR COUNTY SCHOOL

DISTRICT et al.

The applicants filed a petition for writ of mandamus, declaratory judgment,

injunctive relief, and for leave of court to file information in the nature of a quo

warranto against the respondents Taylor County School District and each of the

members of the Taylor County Board of Education and Superintendent in their

official and individual capacities. Among other things, the applicants sought a writ

of mandamus to compel the respondents to restore the employment of the prior

superintendent and enjoin the respondents from unlawfully terminating the prior

superintendent’s employment. The respondents filed a motion to dismiss or for

judgment on the pleadings. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the

petition with prejudice. The applicants then filed this timely application for

discretionary review.1

It appears that the order the applicants seek to appeal is directly appealable. 

All judgments or orders granting or refusing to grant mandamus or injunctive relief

are directly appealable. OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (4) and (6). We will grant an otherwise

timely application for discretionary appeal if the lower court’s order is subject to

direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly, this application is hereby

GRANTED, and the applicants shall have ten days from the date of this order to file

1 The applicants originally filed their application in the Georgia Supreme

Court, which transferred it to this Court. See Case No. S17D1776 (decided June 29,

2017).

August 07, 2017
a notice of appeal with the trial court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (g). If they have already

filed such notice of appeal in the trial court, they need not file a second notice. The

clerk of the trial court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/07/2017
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 121 (Thursday, June 25, 2009)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 30457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15270]



[[Page 30455]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part V





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Notice of June 24, 2009--Continuation of the National Emergency With 
Respect to North Korea


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 121 / Thursday, June 25, 2009 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 30457]]

                Notice of June 24, 2009

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect to North Korea

                On June 26, 2008, by Executive Order 13466, the 
                President declared a national emergency pursuant to the 
                International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 
                1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary 
                threat to the national security and foreign policy of 
                the United States constituted by the current existence 
                and risk of the proliferation of weapons-usable fissile 
                material on the Korean Peninsula. The President also 
                found that it was necessary to maintain certain 
                restrictions with respect to North Korea that would 
                otherwise have been lifted pursuant to Proclamation 
                8271 of June 26, 2008, which terminated the exercise of 
                authorities under the Trading With the Enemy Act (50 
                U.S.C. App. 1-44) with respect to North Korea.

                Because the existence and risk of the proliferation of 
                weapons-usable fissile material on the Korean Peninsula 
                continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to 
                the national security and foreign policy of the United 
                States, the national emergency declared on June 26, 
                2008, and the measures adopted on that date to deal 
                with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond 
                June 26, 2009. Therefore, in accordance with section 
                202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 
                1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national 
                emergency declared in Executive Order 13466.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    June 24, 2009.

[FR Doc. E9-15270
Filed 6-24-09; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3195-W9-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 10, 2015

NO. 03-15-00078-CV

Chris Bell, Appellant

v.

Republican Governors Association, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on November 6, 2014. Appellant 

has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that 

the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal.

Each party shall pay the costs of appeal incurred by that party, both in this Court and the court 

below.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Georgia Exploration Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Dated: August 14, 2006

/s/ Shaheen Jivraj-Sangara

Shaheen Jivraj-Sangara

President and Principal Financial Officer
@article{1214966,
  author = {Colleen Naughton and Rochelle Holm and Nancy Lin and Brooklyn James and Ted Smith},
  title = {Online dashboards for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater data need standard best practices: An environmental health communication agenda},
  year = {2023},
  number = {21},
  month = {2023-04-17 04:04:00},
  publisher = {Journal of Water and Health},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=935764},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2023.312},
  language = {en},
}
Rail Employer Reporting Instructions

Part III - Principles of Service and Compensation

Chapter 5: Taxation of Compensation under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act

1

RUIA Tax Withholding Introduction 

Unlike compensation under the RRA and the RRTA, the monthly maximum taxable and creditable 

compensation amount under the RUIA for an employee may be allocated among multiple 

concurrent employers. 

RUIA Tax Withholding from Multiple Employers 

If an employee works only for a system unit in a month, earnings are creditable and taxable under 

the RUIA up to the monthly maximum. If the employee also worked for another covered employer 

in the same month, the employee's combined earnings are creditable up to the RUIA monthly 

maximum. 

If the combined earnings exceed the RUIA monthly maximum, the creditable RUIA compensation 

may be allocated or prorated between the two employers. The method of prorating is not set by the 

Railroad Retirement Board, but by agreement between the two employers. Any method that yields 

the correct total RUIA compensation and produces payment of the RUIA contribution liability is 

acceptable to the RRB.
June 22, 1999



John W. Henry & Company, Inc.
One Glendinning Place
Westport, Ct. 06880
Attn: Ms. Beth Kenton


         Re:      Management Agreement Renewal
                  Shearson Select Advisors Futures Fund

Dear Ms. Kenton:

We are  writing  with  respect  to  your  management  agreement  concerning  the
commodity pool to which reference is made above (the "Management Agreement"). We
are extending the term of the Management Agreement through June 30, 2000 and all
other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain unchanged.

Please  acknowledge  receipt of this  modification  by signing  one copy of this
letter and returning it to the  attention of Mr. Daniel  Dantuono at the address
above or fax to  212-723-8985.  If you have any  questions  I can be  reached at
212-723-5416.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT INC.



By:
         Daniel A. Dantuono
         Chief Financial Officer,
         Director & Treasurer

RECEIVED

JOHN W. HENRY & COMPANY, INC.

By:


Print Name:

DAD/sr
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 776 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 776

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 7, 2020.
    Resolved, That a committee of two Members be appointed by the Speaker to 
notify the President of the United States that a quorum of the House has 
assembled and that the House is ready to receive any communication that he may 
be pleased to make.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jeremy Frommer, certify that:



|1. | I
    have reviewed this Form 10-Q/A of Jerrick Media Holdings, Inc.; and                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|2. | Based
    on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
    to the period covered by this report.



|Date:
    September 2, 2016 | By: | /s/
    Jeremy Frommer          
|--------------------------- | --- | --------------------------------
|                            |     | Jeremy
    Frommer              
|                            |     | Principal
    Financial Officer 
|                            |     | Jerrick
    Media Holdings, Inc.
|   | • | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended      June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission      (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | • | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                         |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Date:      August 12, 2008                                                              |   |   |
|                                                                                         |   |   |
| /s/    KEVIN HOGGE               |   |   |
| Kevin      Hogge                                                                             |   |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer                                                                 |   |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |   |   |

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00774-CV

Kirk GRONDA,

Appellant

v.

Felipe LERMA,

Appellee

From the 153rd Judicial District Court, Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 153-250263-11

Honorable Susan Heygood McCoy, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF PROSECUTION. Costs of this appeal are taxed against Appellant Kirk Gronda.

SIGNED January 22, 2014.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31270-31271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15452]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1321-000]


Blue Canyon Wind Power V, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

June 24, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Blue Canyon Wind V, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of

[[Page 31271]]

future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability, is July 
14, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St.. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list.
    They are also available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#783e3d2a3b37161411161d2b0d0808170a0c381e1d0a1b561f170e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1b5d5e495854757772757e486e6b6b74696f5b7d7e6978357c746d">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-15452 Filed 6-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### ELLER v. MUTUAL BEN. HEALTH & ACCIDENT ASS’N.

No. 83.

District Court, S. D. Iowa, Central Division.

May 1, 1940.

C. B. Hextell, of Des Moines, Iowa, for plaintiff.

Wm. Hossfeld, of Lehmann, Hurlburt *&*Hossfeld, of Des Moines, Iowa, for defendant.

DEWEY, District Judge.

In the above entitled action a motion was filed by the plaintiff for leave to use depositions, and the matter coming on for hearing in open court was argued and submitteck

While not as clear as it might be, I am satisfied the wordings of Rule 26 (d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, permit the use of the depositions requested in the trial of this case as far as admissible under the rules of evidence (see Moore’s Federal Practice, page 2468, where Rule 26 is discussed), as it especially appears :

1. That the parties and the subject matter are the same as in the case in which the depositions were first taken, to wit, Eller v. Mutual Benefit Health *&*Accident Ass’n, which was then pending in the District Court of the State of Iowa in and for Polk County, being Law No. 45773.

2. That the witnesses will not appear by subpoena and reside more than 100 miles from the place of trial.

3. And that the plaintiff is financially unable to again pay for the taking of these depositions as the witnesses refuse to leave Iowa City unless compelled to do so and the charges for their services as witnesses and the expense of taking their depositions is substantial.

Plaintiff’s motion for leave to use depositions is therefore sustained and permission granted to so use the depositions subject to the objections at the trial as to the competency and materiality of the evidence.

Defendant excepts.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

 

The undersigned, David Gorodyansky, theChief Financial Officer of INTELLIGENT BUYING. INC. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

 

1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended Septembe 30, 2012 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. Information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statementthis 19th day of November 2012.

 

*/s/ David Gorodyansky*

------------------------------------

David Gorodyansky

Principal Financial Officer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section906 has been provided to Intelligent Buying, Inc. and will be retained by Intelligent Buying, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.