T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DA VI D B R OWN, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. STA TE O F H A W A I I ; LA U RA T H IE L E N ; N A N C Y M C M A H O N , i n h er o f f i c i a l c ap a c i ty ; ME L AN I E C HI NE N, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 15000 D. C . No . 1 : 0 7 - c v - 0 0 5 5 6 - AC KLE K ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f o rth e D is tr ic t o f

H a w a ii A l a n C . K a y , S e ni orD i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry16, 2011

H o n o lu lu , H a w a ii B efo re: T A S H IM A , W . F L E T C H E R , an dB E R Z O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D a vi d B r ow n appe a l s the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s gr a ntof s um m a ryj udgm e ntt o the S t at e of H aw ai i , M el ani e C hi nen, and v ar i ou s def endant s i n thei r off

i ci al c ap a c i t i e s . W e a f

f i rm. 

# FI LED MA R 25 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

B row n argues thatH aw ai i ’ s S t at e H i st ori c P re se rvat i on D i vi si on (“ S H P D ”) i s vi ol a t i ng the N a t i ve A m e r i c a n G r a ve s P r ot e c t i on a nd R e pa tr i a t i on A c t , 24 U . S . C . § 3001 e t

s e q. , byf

a i l i ng t o pr ope r l yi nve nt orya nd c a r e f orN a t i ve H aw ai i an hu m an re m ai ns un der i t s c on trol . W e a gree w i th the di stri ctcourtthat B r ow n di d notm e e tthe r e qui r e m e nt s f orpe rm a ne nti nj unc t i ve r e l i e f be c aus e he d idn o t d e m o n s tr a te th a t h e f a c e dim m e d ia te o rirr e p a r ab le in ju ry . Se e G. C. & K. B. I nvs . , I nc . v . W i l s on , 3 2 6 F .3 d1 0 9 6 , 1 1 0 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) ; R eno A i r R aci ngA ss ’n v. McC o rd , 4 5 2 F .3 d1 1 2 6 , 1 1 3 7 n .1 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) . B ro w n al so arg u es th atth e S t at e, an dC h i n en i n h er i n d i v i d u al cap aci ty, d e c id e dn o t to r e n e w h is c o n tr a c t in r e ta lia tio n f o rh is c r itic is m s o f

th e S H P D . M ostof B row n’ s s peec h w as m ade “ pu rs uantt o h i s off i ci al du t i es ” and w as there fore un prot ec t ed un der G ar c e t t iv . C e bal los , 547 U . S . 410 ( 2006) . S om e of B r ow n’ s s pe e c h w a s pr ot e c t e d, butB r ow n f a i l e d t o c ontr ove rtC hi ne n’ s de c l a r a t i on thatshe w as un aw ar e of the prot ec t ed spee ch atthe t i m e s he deci ded n ott o renew B row n’ s c on tra ct . T here fore , B row n’ s prot ec t ed spee ch coul d n othave m ot i vat ed C h in e n to r e ta lia te a g a in s t h im . Se e Ke ys e rv . Sa c r a m e n to C ityU n ifie d Sc h . D is t. , 2 6 5 F .3 d7 4 1 , 7 5 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) . F in a lly , B r o w n ap p e a ls th e a w a r do f a tto rn e y ’s f

e e s to th e S ta te a n dC h in e n . B ec ause B row n d i d n otfi l e ase para t e not i ce of appeal af t erthe fe e aw ar d w as3

e n te r e d , w e h a v e n o ju r is d ic tio n to r e v ie w th is c la im . Les l i e v . G r u p o ICA , 198 F . 3d 11 52 , 11 60 (9th C i r. 19 99 ). AF F I RME D; a p p e a lf r o m f e e a wa r d DI S MI S S E D.