alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906**

**of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 

In connection with thereport of Primoris Services Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian Pratt, Chairman of theBoard, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

1.                                      The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                      The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

In witness whereof, theundersigned has executed and delivered this certificate as of the date setforth opposite his signature below.

 
| Date: August 11, 2009 | /s/ BRIAN PRATT                                                 |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Brian Pratt                                                     |
| * *                   | *Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and  President* |

 

----
FILE COPY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

NO. 15-0186

GERALD K. JOHNSON

v.

CHRISTINE EVANS AND

FREDERICK M. EVANS

Anderson County,

9 Court of Appe

§

••••••••••

12th District.

May 29, 2015

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, GERALD K. JOHNSON, pay all costs incurred on

this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 9th day ofJuly, 2015.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1.


Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








I, Neil Blosch, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of Ultra Sun Corp. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period September 30, 2010 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Dated:  November 9, 2010
By:
/s/ Neil BloschNeil BloschChief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer





* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ultra Sun Corp. and will be retained by Ultra Sun Corp. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Interim Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officer of Sharper Image Corporation, a Delaware corporation (Sharper Image), does hereby certify that:



| | a) | The Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006 (Amendment No. 1) of Sharper Image fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b) | The information contained in Amendment No. 1 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Sharper Image.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                             
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Jerry W. Levin                          
|    |  | Jerry W. Levin                              
|    |  | Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | March 1, 2007
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0416. LEWIS v. THE STATE.

Gregory Lewis appeals from convictions and the denial of his motion for new

trial. In one of his enumerations, Lewis contends that the evidence adduced at trial

was insufficient to support his conviction for aggravated sodomy. In addressing this

issue in its order denying Lewis’s motion for new trial, the trial court relied on the

contents of the child victim’s forensic interview, a video recording of which played

for the jury and tendered into evidence at trial as State’s Exhibit 11. The State

likewise relies on the contents of this recorded interview in its argument on appeal. 

However, the record transmitted to this Court fails to include State’s Exhibit 11.

Furthermore, our review of the trial transcript indicates that a separate video

recording of another child victim’s forensic interview was played for the jury and

tendered into evidence as State’s Exhibit 10. Although the State relies, in part, on the

contents of this recorded interview in its response brief, State’s Exhibit 10 was

likewise not included in the appellate record.

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that this case be REMANDED to the trial

court for completion of the record. It is further ordered that, upon the filing of the

complete record in the trial court, the clerk of the trial court shall transmit the entire

record, which shall include all trial exhibits, to this Court for the re-docketing of this

case.

July 13, 2015
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/13/2015
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),J. Timothy Bryan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Dennis Schmitt,Senior Vice President, Finance (principal financial officer), each herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ J. TIMOTHY BRYAN                            |     | /s/ DENNIS SCHMITT                                                                    |
|-------------------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| J. Timothy Bryan                                |     | Dennis Schmitt                                                                        |
| *Chief Executive Officer*November 14, 2006 | * * | *Senior Vice President, Finance (principal  financial officer)*November 14, 2006 |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), has been provided to ICO GlobalCommunications (Holdings) Limited and will be retained by ICO GlobalCommunications (Holdings) Limited and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Qto which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of ICOGlobal Communications (Holdings) Limited under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether madebefore or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
@article{1214746,
  author = {Chen-Shan Chin and Sairam Behera and Asif Khalak and Fritz Sedlazeck and Justin Wagner and Justin Zook},
  title = {Multiscale analysis of pangenomes enables improved representation of genomic diversity for repetitive and clinically relevant genes},
  year = {2023},
  number = {20},
  month = {2023-06-26 04:06:00},
  publisher = {Nature Methods},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=935376},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-01914-y},
  language = {en},
}
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15505]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in open session at 
11:30 a.m. on Thursday, July 2, 2009, to consider the following matter:

Discussion Agenda

    Memorandum and resolution re: Policy on Investment in, or 
Acquisition of, Failing Insured Depository Institutions.
    The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of 
the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.
    This Board meeting will be Webcast live via the Internet and 
subsequently made available on-demand approximately one week after the 
event. Visit http://www.vodium.com/goto/fdic/boardmeetings.asp to view 
the event. If you need any technical assistance, please visit our Video 
Help page at: http://www.fdic.gov/video.html.
    The FDIC will provide attendees with auxiliary aids (e.g., sign 
language interpretation) required for this meeting. Those attendees 
needing such assistance should call (703) 562-6067 (Voice or TTY), to 
make necessary arrangements.
    Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be 
directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the 
Corporation, at (202) 898-7043.

    Dated: June 25, 2009.
Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. E9-15505 Filed 6-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
November 21, 2014 www.bls.gov

BLS Technical Advisory Committee Agenda

Bureau of Labor Statistics 

Conference Center, Rooms 1 and 2 

2 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20212

8:30 Commissioner’s welcome and review of agency developments

9:00 Adjusting Major Sector Productivity Industry Multifactor Productivity to Account for Changes in the 

Composition of Labor

Presenter: Cindy Zoghi

Discussants: Carol Corrado, Daniel Sullivan

 

10:30 Break

10:45 Updates on topics from past committee meetings:

• Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (SOII) Undercount

• How to Take Account of Internet Job Search in Measuring Unemployment in the Current Population 

Survey (CPS)

12:15 Lunch

1:30 Discussion of future priorities

 

2:00 Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) Redesign: Sampling and Estimation

Presenter: Matthew Dey

2:45 Break 

3:00 Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) Redesign: Sampling and Estimation, continued

Discussants: Pia Orrenius, William Rodgers

4:00 Approximate conclusion
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

DEBRA A. MANTEY, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

UNPUBLISHED 

July 21, 2015 

v No. 319673 

Saginaw Circuit Court 

Family Division 

DONALD E. MANTEY, LC No. 08-003051-DO 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

Before: BORRELLO, P.J., and RONAYNE KRAUSE and RIORDAN, JJ. 

RONAYNE KRAUSE, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part) 

 For the most part, I concur in the results reached by the majority. I disagree in several 

respects. First and foremost, I disagree with the majority’s finding that the trial court did not err 

in concluding that the vast majority of the contributions to the parties’ estate was the result of 

defendant’s actions and severely underestimates the practical value of a partner raising children, 

maintaining a home, and otherwise carrying out domestic tasks. I would vacate that part of the 

trial court’s finding and direct on remand that the trial court provide reasonably detailed findings 

on the record as to the parties’ respective contributions to their marital partnership. Second, 

under the circumstances, I am not persuaded that the trial court’s finding that defendant had 

“‘some’ ability to pay” is sufficiently precise to permit it or this Court to determine whether any 

particular amount of spousal support is proper; as the majority notes, “some” essentially means it 

is undetermined or undefined. I find this to be insufficiently definite within the meaning of 

MCR 2.517(A)(2). Finally, I do not believe the word “ample” means anything without further 

context and particularly without considering what ultimate spousal support is awarded and 

plaintiff’s realistic prospects for being able to support herself. I do, however, agree that on 

remand the trial court must determine the amount of defendant’s spousal support arrearage, if 

any, and make a finding of the value of the Mantey Hills partnership and plaintiff’s interest 

therein, if any. 

/s/ Amy Ronayne Krause
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of Sharper Image Corporation, a Delaware corporation (Sharper Image), does hereby certify that:

a) The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006 (the Form 10-K) of Sharper Image fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Sharper Image.



|    |  |                                                           
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    RICHARD J.
THALHEIMER                              
|    |  | Richard J. Thalheimer Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

May 1, 2006
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 22, 2015.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-2897

Lower Tribunal No. 13-421

________________

Enzio C. Boffelli,

Petitioner,

vs.

Kent Security Services,

Respondent.

On Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County,

Stanford Blake, Lisa S. Walsh and Marcia B. Caballero, Judges.

Enzio C. Boffelli, in proper person.

Cole, Scott & Kissane and Kathryn L. Smith, for respondent.

Before WELLS, SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

WELLS, Judge.
We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, see Fla. R.App. P.

9.030(b)(2)(B), and deny the petition because there is no departure from the

essential requirements of the law. See Soro Co. Intern., Inc. v. Jones 89 So. 3d

258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Nicaragua Trader Corp. v. Alejo Fla. Props., LLC, 19

So. 3d 395, 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“On second-tier certiorari review, this Court

must determine whether the circuit court, acting in its appellate capacity, afforded

procedural due process and followed the essential requirements of law.”).

Certiorari denied.

2
EXHIBIT 23.1



IMMUCELL CORPORATION



CONSENT OF BAKER NEWMAN & NOYES, LLC



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



To the Board of Directors

ImmuCell Corporation



We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-2631 and No. 333-65514) of ImmuCell Corporation of our report dated January 23, 2004, relating to the financial statements and the financial statement
schedule as of December 31, 2003 and for the year then ended, which appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/    BAKER NEWMAN &
NOYESBaker Newman & Noyes Limited Liability Company




Portland, Maine

March 24, 2004
ACCEPTED

06-15-00108-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

7/20/2015 3:32:40 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 7/20/2015 3:32:40 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
Program 

Letter

United States Railroad 

Retirement Board

Office of Programs

Quality Reporting Service Center

e-mail: QRSC@rrb.gov

 Phone: (312) 751-4992

 Fax: (312) 751-7190

Letter No. 

2012-01

November 28, 2011

TO: Certification Contact Officials

SUBJECT: Elimination of Technical Support for the PC Reporting Program

Please distribute this notice to all individuals within your organization who may need the 

information in connection with their work. 

The U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) is eliminating technical support for the Employer 

Reporting (PC) Program after the 2012 reporting season ends. We will continue to process service 

and compensation reports generated by the program, including the 2011 annual reports, which 

are due on February 29, 2012. However, we will not be able to assist you with any problems you 

may encounter while using the software after that time, nor will we be able to issue any new or 

replacement copies of the program.

As a replacement to using the PC Reporting Program, we encourage the use of alternate 

compensation reporting methods, including the Employer Reporting System (ERSNet). The 

following forms are available on the new consolidated ERSNet system: 

• Form BA-4, Report of Creditable Compensation Adjustments

• Form BA-6a, Form BA-6 Address Report

• Form GL-129a, Record of Employer Determination on Employee Protest

• Form ID-4E, Notice of RUIA Claim Determinations

• Form ID-4K, Prepayment Notice of Employee’s Applications and Claims for Benefits 

under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA).

We are also planning to add Form BA-3, Annual Report of Creditable Compensation and Form 

BA-11, Report of Gross Earnings in early 2012. If you are not currently signed up to file reports 

through ERSNet, we encourage you to do so. If you enroll now, you are automatically authorized 

to submit any new forms that will be added to the system. 

In addition, you can create your automated/electronic compensation reports using the RRB’s 

record layouts/file formats listed in Appendix 1 of the Employer Reporting Instructions and 
Labor Employer Reporting Instructions. Submission of those reports to the RRB can be via CDROM, Secure E-mail or File Transfer Protocol (FTP). For more information about using Secure 

Email or FTP, you can reference RRB Program Letter 2008-05, “FTP and E-mail Submission of 

Reporting Forms”.

For more information you may contact us in the Quality Reporting Service Center at the 

telephone number and e-mail address shown above.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ William J. HoranWilliam J. Horan, Chairman, President and Director(Principal Executive Officer)Dated:  May 13, 2011
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - November 2002 

Benefit payments November 2002 November 2001 

Total $726,622,000 $694,401,000 

Retired employees 460,729,000 438,524,000 

Regular Retirement Spouses and divorced spouses 88,069,000 85,458,000 

and Survivor Benefits Widow(er)s - aged and disabled 156,453,000 149,626,000 

Other survivors 21,371,000 20,793,000 

Number Average1 Number Average1 

Total 641,000 ......... 2,600 ......... ......... 

Regular employee annuities, total 297,000 $1,538 1,100 $2,097 ......... 

Age 215,200 1,502 2 500 2 2,535 3 $1,154 

Disability, age 65 and over 36,900 1,372 ......... ......... ......... 

Disability, under age 65 44,900 1,843 300 2,003 

Spouses and divorced spouses 150,300 581 700 700 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 164,600 949 700 1,306 

Widowed mothers and fathers 1,100 1,235 4/ 1,508 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 15,100 631 100 702 

Children 12,800 731 100 1,017 

Other survivors 100 624 ......... ......... ......... 

Average under 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded in 

month 

Social Security 

Monthly benefits November 2002 

......... 

Being Paid Awarded 

......... 

$882 

......... 

822 894 

432 325 

835 716 

631 642 

5/ / 

576 596 

......... 

5 

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

Benefit payments 

November November 

2002 2001 Number Average 

$5,526,000 $5,616,000 131,700 $42 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Number Average 

500 $41 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement. 

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 34); some 300 

other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis. 

4

Fewer than 50. 

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers. 

Note.--Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

November 2002 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Unemployment 4,300 $257.25 

Sickness 7,400 258.15 

Unemployment 

Sickness 4,273,000 5,095,000 

$8,558,000 

3,535,000 3,463,000 

Total $7,808,000 

Benefit payments 

November 2002 November 2001 

$451.00 

473.71 

Average payment 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period 

Per 

full week 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding 

Recycled 

Paper 

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary and the Office of Public Affairs