alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                     133,299,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              332,005,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,121,000
<INVENTORY>                                 28,147,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           671,349,000
<PP&E>                                     329,668,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             194,938,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             890,845,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      271,451,000
<BONDS>                                      9,910,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       430,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 508,858,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               890,845,000
<SALES>                                    600,496,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           833,886,000
<CGS>                                      309,016,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              480,611,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           299,451,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,694,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,829,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             50,512,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                11,825,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         38,687,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                38,687,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.95
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Obstetric Pharmacology Research Units.                    

*Date:*                         July 23, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Peter Zelazowski, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Rm. 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-7510, 301-435-6902,                         *peter.zelazowski@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 22, 2009.

Anna Snouffer,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-15574 Filed 6-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### In the Matter of Dennis M. Ellison et al., Appellants, v New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Respondent, and Lighthouse Properties, Intervenor-Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 125]

*458Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered October 15, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, awarded petitioners interest from December 13, 2000, and denied their request for attorneys’ fees, unanimously modified, on the law, interest awarded from May 19, 1995, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

When a tenant is forced to commence a plenary action to enforce a fair market rent appeal (FMRA) award, the courts have formulated rules to assure the tenant is made whole by receiving interest from the date of the Rent Administrator’s order *(Chechak v Hakim,*269 AD2d 333 [2000]), plus attorneys’ fees where so provided for in the lease. Here, where the Deputy Commissioner’s order of December 13, 2000 “modified” the earlier order of the Rent Administrator of May 19, 1995, interest should accrue from the date of the Rent Administrator’s order. While respondent argues that petitioners changed their theory of the case at a late date from overcharge to FMRA, and that it was not until the December 13, 2000 order that the Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) agreed to treat the case as an FMRA, it would be inequitable to punish petitioners for DHCR’s failure to accept their position that the case should have been converted to an FMRA sooner. In this regard, the December 13, 2000 order noted that “the original complaint filed by the tenants herein was, in essence, questioning the Fair Market Rent, as the complaint mentioned that the rent of the prior tenant . . . was ‘significantly inflated’ upon decontrol,” and DHCR, in an order of November 24, 1992, had rejected petitioners’ first attempt to convert their complaint into an FMRA. The award of interest from May 19, 1995 also comports with notions of fairness because the owner has had the use of petitioner’s money.

On the record before us, petitioners were not entitled to recover attorneys’ fees under Real Property Law § 234 because they failed to establish that the lease would entitle the landlord to recover attorneys’ fees in an action similarly seeking to recover damages for breach of the lease *(see Busbee v Ken-Rob Co.,*280 AD2d 406 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 605 [2001]). Concur—Buckley, EJ., Tom, Marlow, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

August 12, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 08-10997

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM IREY, 

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------------

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Middle District of Florida

--------------------------

(Opinion March 30, 2009, 563 F.3d 1223, 11th Cir. 2009)

(August 12, 2009)

BEFORE: DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, BLACK, CARNES,

BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges*.

B Y T H E C O U R T:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should

be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service

having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous

panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

___________________

*Senior United States Circuit Judge James C. Hill has elected to participate in further proceedings

in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).
Ex. 10.3 6-30-13 UGI Utilities 10Q




EXHIBIT 10.3


Service Agreement No. SST No. 79133
Control Number _________




LETTER AGREEMENT
AMENDING SST SERVICE AGREEMENT




THIS LETTER AGREEMENT is entered into and made effective June 10, 2013, by and between COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC (“Transporter”) and UGI UTILITIES, INC. (“Shipper”).


WITNESSETH:  That in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree that existing SST service agreement No. 79133 shall be amended as follows:


Section 3.  Rates.  Effective June 11, 2013, through December 2013, Shipper agrees to pay, in addition to all other charges then applicable to the agreement, a negotiated monthly fee of $____ on SST Contract 79133.






UGI UTILITIES, INC.                COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC




BY: /s/ Robert F. Beard                BY: /s/ Joseph Shields        
ITS: President and CEO                ITS: Chief Operating Officer
DATE: 6/7/13                          DATE:  6/10/13
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-15-00007-CV

HYDROGEO, LLC, FIRST BANK & TRUST EAST TEXAS, AND DEBERRY 3 

OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, Appellants

V.

QUITMAN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 402nd Judicial District Court

Wood County, Texas

Trial Court No. T-3625

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Hydrogeo, LLC (Hydrogeo), and First Bank & Trust East Texas (First Bank) filed a joint 

notice of appeal from the trial court’s judgment in trial court cause number T-3625, styled Quitman 

Independent School District, et al. v. Black Diamond Operating Co, LLC, et al., in the 402nd

Judicial District Court of Wood County on January 21, 2015. Thereafter, on January 27, 2015, 

DeBerry 3 Operating Company, LLC (DeBerry), filed its separate notice of appeal from the same 

judgment. 

Hydrogeo and First Bank have filed a joint brief in this appeal, and although DeBerry has 

notified this Court that it does not intend to file a brief, it has not filed a motion to dismiss its 

appeal. 

Accordingly, this Court deems it appropriate to sever DeBerry’s appeal against all 

appellees from the appeal filed by Hydrogeo and First Bank in order that DeBerry’s appeal may 

be appropriately and timely dismissed for want of prosecution. 

We, therefore, sever DeBerry’s appeal from the appeal brought by Hydrogeo and First 

Bank and docket the severed appeal under cause number 06-15-00036-CV.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: July 22, 2015
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 21, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-31158

Summary Calendar

GARY SMITH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:04-CV-539

--------------------

Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gary Smith appeals the affirmance of the Social Security

Commissioner’s denial of his application for Supplemental

Security Income (SSI). He argues that the district court

erroneously concluded the he was not disabled within the meaning

of the Social Security Act because (1) his impairment meets or

exceeds the impairment listed at 20 C.F.R. 404, Subpt. P, App. 1, 

§ 12.06 for an anxiety disorder, and (2) his impairment makes him

unable to work. Substantial evidence in the record supports the
No. 04-31158

-2-

ALJ’s conclusion that Smith could not meet or exceed the listed

impairment because there was no evidence that Smith experienced

two of the conditions of 20 C.F.R. 404, Subpt. P, App. 1,

§ 12.06B. 

Regarding Smith’s allegation that he is unable to work, the

ALJ found Smith’s subjective complaints of functional limitations

to lack credibility. Because this finding is supported by

substantial record evidence, it is entitled to judicial

deference. See Villa v. Sullivan, 895 F.2d 1019, 1024 (5th Cir.

1990). Moreover, the vocational expert testified that a person

with Smith’s age, education, and impairment could work at one of

over 50,000 jobs in Louisiana. Thus, the ALJ’s conclusion that

Smith could work is supported by substantial evidence. See

Masterson v. Barnhart, 309 F.3d 267, 273-74 (5th Cir. 2002). 

Smith also argues that his case should be remanded based on

new material evidence that reveals that he is disabled. Smith

has not shown that the new evidence relates to the time period

for which benefits were denied, reveals more than a deterioration

of his impairments that were previously found not to be

disabling, or would have changed the outcome of the

Commissioner’s determination. Accordingly, no remand is

warranted based on the new evidence Smith submitted. See Ripley

v. Chater, 67 F.3d 552, 555 (5th Cir. 1995); Leggett v. Chater,

67 F.3d 558, 567 (5th Cir. 1995). The judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
@article{1212031,
  author = {Muhammad Imram and Paul M. Haney and Yafis Barlas},
  title = {Hofstadter moiré butterfly in twisted trilayer graphene},
  year = {2023},
  number = {108},
  month = {2023-08-10 04:08:00},
  publisher = {Physical Review B},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=935955},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.085417},
  language = {en},
}
@article{115506,
  author = {Peter Schenck and Jennifer Klamo and Nabil Bassim and Peter Burke and Yvonne Gerbig and Martin Green},
  title = {Combinatorial study of the crystallinity boundary in the HfO2-TiO2-Y2O3 system using pulsed laser deposition library thin films},
  year = {2008},
  number = {517},
  month = {2008-05-16},
  publisher = {Thin Solid Films},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=853610},
  language = {en},
}
Exhibit 31.1.  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Chief Executive Officer Certification
Pursuant To Section 302 Of 
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

|I, James D. Delamater, certify that:
|------------------------------------
|                                    
|1.                                  
|                                    
|2.                                  
|                                    
|3.                                  
|                                    
|4.                                  
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|5.                                  
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    



|September 21, 2005 | /s/ James D. Delamater 
|------------------ | -----------------------
|                   | James D. Delamater     
|                   | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2


Form 10-K


Cardiff International, Inc.


File No. 000-49709





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT


TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Cardiff International, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: July 7, 2011
By:
/s/ Daniel ThompsonChief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16

                               DAVOX CORPORATION

                    EXECUTUVE VICE PRESIDENT - GLOBAL SALES

                              SEVERANCE AGREEMENT


DAVOX Corporation ("DAVOX") will provide to you the following terms and
condition of salary and benefits continuation:


   (1.) DAVOX shall provide a continuation of your base salary and medical
        benefits at DAVOX's cost, as may be in effect at the time of a
        qualifying termination as set forth in subclause 2, commencing upon the
        date of termination, for a period of six (6) months.


   (2.) DAVOX shall provide continuation of salary and benefits as set forth in
        subclause (1) in the event your employment is terminated for the
        following reasons: (a) economic layoff; (b) merger, acquisition or
        downsizing of the Sales organization which results in the elimination of
        your position as Executive Vice President Global Sales; or (c)
        reorganization of the Sales organization which would require you to
        relocate.


Following the effective date of termination, as set forth in writing and
furnished to you by DAVOX, your employment with DAVOX shall cease and you shall
not hold yourself as an employee, agent, or representative of DAVOX.

Continuation of salary and benefits shall further be subject to your compliance
with any then existing company policies and such other terms as may be in effect
between you and DAVOX pertaining to the disclosure of confidential or
proprietary information.

DAVOX has final authority to determine all questions of eligibility to receive
benefits under this arrangement and to interpret and construe the terms of this
arrangement.


Approval:


          /s/ David M. Sample                                March 1, 2001
          -------------------                                -------------
          President and Chief Executive Officer              Date


          /s/ Anthony A. Colangelo                           March 1, 2001
          ------------------------                           -------------
          Executive Vice President - Global Sales            Date
Schedule II
<TABLE>
                            CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
                          VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                          FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

                                   (In Millions)
<CAPTION>
                                         Additions
                                    -------------------
                        Balance at  Charged to  Charged                 Balance
                        Beginning   Costs and   to Other                At End
Description              of Period   Expenses   Accounts  Deductions   of Period
-----------             ----------  ----------  --------  ----------   ---------
<S>                        <C>          <C>        <C>         <C>         <C>
                                                   (1)


1993
Casualty reserves
     Current              $110                                $17 (2)      $ 93
     Noncurrent            153         $122       $11         154 (3)       132

Allowance for
disposition of property
and equipment (4)          277                                 21           256

1994
Casualty reserves
     Current                93                                (10) (2)      103
     Noncurrent            132          175        12         107  (3)      212

Allowance for
disposition of property
and equipment (4)          256                                 15           241

1995
Casualty reserves
     Current               103                                 (4) (2)      107
     Noncurrent            212          174        14         183  (3)      217

Allowance for
disposition of property
and equipment (4)(5)       241          261                    63           439

<FN>
(1) Includes charges to property accounts in connection with construction
     projects and the recording of receivables from third parties.

(2) Includes net transfers from noncurrent.

(3) Transfers to current.

(4) Deductions of $21 million, $15 million and $63 million in 1993, 1994,
     and 1995 respectively, represent net losses on asset dispositions.

(5) In 1995, the Company recorded an asset disposition charge, which resulted
     from a review of the Company's route system and other operating assets to
     determine those that no longer effectively and economically support
     current and expected operations.  The Company identified and has
     committed to sell 1,800 miles of rail lines that are expected to provide
     proceeds substantially less than net book value.  In addition, other
     assets, principally yards and side tracks, identified for disposition
     have been written down to estimated net realizable value.
</FN>
</TABLE>


                                    S-1
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBAENES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Stem Cell Therapy International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the six months ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each
of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officers knowledge: Section 13(a)



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of Section 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934: and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



|                       |  |                                 |  |                  
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|Signatures             |  | Title                           |  | Date             
|                       |  |                                
|/s/ David Stark        |  | President                       |  | November 14, 2008
|David Stark            |  |                                 |  |                  
|                       |  |                                
|/s/ Andrew J. Norstrud |  | Chief Financial Officer & Chief |  |                  
|Andrew J. Norstrud     |  | Accounting Officer              |  | November 14, 2008