alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 659 

Affirming that States should maintain primacy for the regulation of hydraulic 

fracturing for oil and natural gas production on State and private lands 

and that the President should not declare a moratorium on the use 

of hydraulic fracturing on Federal lands (including the Outer Continental 

Shelf), State lands, private lands, or lands held in trust for an Indian 

Tribe unless such moratorium is authorized by an Act of Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 29, 2019 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Affirming that States should maintain primacy for the regulation of hydraulic fracturing for oil and natural gas 

production on State and private lands and that the President should not declare a moratorium on the use of 

hydraulic fracturing on Federal lands (including the 

Outer Continental Shelf), State lands, private lands, or 

lands held in trust for an Indian Tribe unless such 

moratorium is authorized by an Act of Congress. 

1 Resolved, That States should maintain primacy for 

2 the regulation of hydraulic fracturing for oil and natural 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 659 IH 

1 gas production on State and private lands and that the 

2 President should not declare a moratorium on the use of 

3 hydraulic fracturing on Federal lands (including the Outer 

4 Continental Shelf), State lands, private lands, or lands 

5 held in trust for an Indian Tribe unless such moratorium 

6 is authorized by an Act of Congress. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fearless International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey Binder, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: | November 13, 2007
|----- | -----------------
|     
|      | By:              
|      | Name:            
|      | Title:           

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,901]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on May 7, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a state workforce official on behalf of workers of VWR International, LLC, West Chester, Pennsylvania.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of May, 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-15212 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
@conference{10841,
  author = {Carl Miller and Yoshihiro Ohno and Wendy Davis and Yuqin Zong and Kevin Dowling},
  title = {NIST SPECTRALLY TUNABLE LIGHTING FACILITY FOR COLOR RENDERING AND LIGHTING EXPERIMENTS},
  year = {2009},
  month = {2009-05-29},
  publisher = {Light and Lighting Conference with Special Emphasis on LEDs and Solid State Lighting, Budapest, -1},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=903085},
  language = {en},
}
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Certificationpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Solera National Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, inaccordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|                                | SOLERA NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.                     |
|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:  May 13, 2010      |                                              |
|                                |                                              |
|                                | By:                                          | /s/ Douglas Crichfield |
|                                |                                              |
|                                | Douglas Crichfield                                |
|                                | President & Chief Executive Officer      |
|                                | (Principal Executive Officer)                     |
|                                |                                              |
| Dated:  May 13, 2010 |                                              |
|                                |                                              |
|                                | By:                                          | /s/ Robert J. Fenton |
|                                |                                              |
|                                | Robert J. Fenton                                  |
|                                | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
|                                | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)      |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SoleraNational Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Solera National Bancorp, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 734 

Expressing support for the designation of the week of September 20 through 

September 26, 2020, as ‘‘Purple Star Families Week’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 26, 2019 

Mr. RIGGLEMAN (for himself, Mr. SCALISE, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. MEADOWS, 

Mr. WALDEN, Mr. MAST, Mr. GRIFFITH, Mr. FLORES, Mr. MURPHY of 

North Carolina, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. LATTA, Mr. 

LONG, Mr. GONZALEZ of Ohio, Mr. ARRINGTON, Mr. CLINE, Mr. 

BURCHETT, Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, Mr. JOYCE of Ohio, Mr. TRONE, 

Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. CLOUD, Mr. JOYCE of Pennsylvania, Mr. 

NEWHOUSE, Mr. STEIL, Mr. TAYLOR, Mr. ROSE of New York, Mr. 

BANKS, Mr. WILLIAMS, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. WALKER, Mrs. MURPHY

of Florida, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. MITCHELL, Mr. PENCE, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mrs. WALORSKI, Mr. STEUBE, Mrs. LEE of Nevada, Mr. BAIRD, 

Mrs. LURIA, Mr. KUSTOFF of Tennessee, Mr. KEVIN HERN of Oklahoma, 

Mr. BALDERSON, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. RESCHENTHALER, Mr. 

BIGGS, Ms. SPANBERGER, and Mr. MASSIE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of the week of September 20 through September 26, 2020, as ‘‘Purple Star 

Families Week’’. 

Whereas it is recognized that wounds sustained through 

armed service to the United States of America are both 

visible and invisible; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 734 IH 

Whereas these invisible wounds are frequently undertreated 

and poorly healed; 

Whereas the Department of Veterans Affairs has determined 

that an average of more than 20 veterans die by suicide 

per day; 

Whereas veterans account for a disproportionate percentage 

of all adult suicides in the United States; 

Whereas surviving family members of veterans who succumb 

to the invisible wounds of war are often forgotten and 

isolated; 

Whereas these family members lose their link to the support 

and strength of the military and veteran communities 

after their loss; 

Whereas the need for formal recognition of these families is 

vital to the strength, health, and survival of the community of United States veterans; 

Whereas these families may be designated for recognition and 

support as ‘‘Purple Star Families’’; and 

Whereas the week of September 20 through September 26, 

2020, is an appropriate week to designate as ‘‘Purple 

Star Families Week’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of ‘‘Purple Star Families Week’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - September 2002 

Benefit payments September 2002 September 2001 

Total $726,675,000 $696,030,000 

Retired employees 460,453,000 438,819,000 

Regular Retirement Spouses and divorced spouses 88,329,000 85,981,000 

and Survivor Benefits Widow(er)s - aged and disabled 156,570,000 150,422,000 

Other survivors 21,324,000 20,808,000 

Number Average1 Number Average1 

Total 643,600 ......... 2,700 ......... ......... 

Regular employee annuities, total 297,700 $1,531 1,100 $2,161 ......... 

Age 216,000 1,496 2 500 2 2,545 3 $1,162 

Disability, age 65 and over 37,000 1,366 ......... ......... ......... 

Disability, under age 65 44,600 1,838 400 2,132 

Spouses and divorced spouses 151,000 579 800 721 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 165,700 944 600 1,315 

Widowed mothers and fathers 1,100 1,228 4/ 1,499 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 15,200 630 100 755 

Children 12,800 728 4/ 991 

Other survivors 100 601 ......... ......... ......... 

Average under 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded in 

month 

Social Security 

Monthly benefits September 2002

Being Paid Awarded 

......... 

......... 

$880 

......... 

628 636 

820 891 

432 326 

......... 

5/ / 

574 596 

834 714 

5

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement. 

Benefit payments 

September September 

2002 2001 Number Average 

$5,611,000 $5,427,000 132,100 $42 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Number Average 

600 $41 

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 35); about 300 

other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis. 

4

Fewer than 50. 

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers. 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

September 2002 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Unemployment 3,300 $255.05 

Sickness 7,500 257.45 

Unemployment 

Sickness 

Average payment 

Per 

full week 

$460.49 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period 

467.76 

September 2002 

Benefit payments 

September 2001 

Total $7,998,000 $7,654,000 

2,864,000 2,331,000 

5,134,000 5,322,000 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding 

Recycled 

Paper 

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary and the Office of Public Affairs
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission. 

# Date And Time:

Tuesday, January 27, 2009, at 10 a.m. 

Wednesday, January 28, 2009, at 10 a.m. 

# Place:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. 

# Status:

These meetings will be closed to the public. 

# Items To Be Discussed:

 

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g. 

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C. 

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration. 

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee. 

# Person to Contact for Information:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220. 

Mary W. Dove, 

Secretary of the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9-1530 Filed 1-26-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark Bridenbaker, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 921]

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Kenneth F. Case, J), rendered October 25, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of reckless assault of a child.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of reckless assault of a child (Penal *1380Law § 120.02 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal *(see generally People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). “Although County Court’s colloquy was brief, defendant signed a detailed written waiver of the right to appeal . . . , and he acknowledged to the court that he understood that he was foregoing the right to appeal” *(People v Luper,*101 AD3d 1668, 1668 [2012], *lv denied*20 NY3d 1101 [2013]; see *People v Ramos,*7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; *cf. People v Bradshaw,*18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]). The valid waiver encompasses defendant’s challenge to the severity of the sentence *(see People v Lococo,*92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]). Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Garni, Sconiers and Whalen, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0403 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. WILLIAM HOMER MCCLELLAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 6 , 202 3, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 30 2023

10/30/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0403
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-14194

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cv-00962-BJD-JBT

EDWARD ABRUSCATO,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

 Defendant - Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(July 20, 2015)

Before TJOFLAT, JULIE CARNES, and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 14-14194 Date Filed: 07/20/2015 Page: 1 of 2 
2

We find no error in the District Court’s orders granting Geico General 

Insurance Company summary judgment, Doc. 126, and denying Edward 

Abruscato’s motion for reconsideration, Doc 133, and therefore, affirm the District 

Court’s judgment for Geico General Insurance Company.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 14-14194 Date Filed: 07/20/2015 Page: 2 of 2
#### Patricia J. Curto, Appellant, v National Fuel Corporation, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[977 NYS2d 664]

Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Scudder, PJ., Fahey, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.
#### Edward Carter, Respondent, v Esther Yang Carter, Appellant.

[854 NYS2d 118]

*428As an initial matter, the order granting defendant poor person relief pertains only to the appeals taken from the orders entered December 29, 2006 and August 30, 2007. Since there is therefore no record properly before this Court with respect to the 16 additional orders from which defendant purports to appeal, the additional orders are not reviewable *(see Insilco Corp. v Star Servs., Inc. of Del.,*2 AD3d 343, 344 [2003]; *DiPasquale v Security Mut. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.,*293 AD2d 394, 395 [2002]).

In any event, defendant’s claims are without merit. Her allegations concerning plaintiffs mental status and medical and educational neglect of the parties’ child are without basis in the record. We reject the argument that plaintiff neglected the child’s educational needs by keeping her enrolled at a public school on Staten Island that was described as a “failing school” under the federal No Child Left Behind Act. It was reasonable for plaintiff to keep the child close to home while seeking to have her admitted to one of the three top-performing schools on Staten Island.

The court properly found that the increased disability payments that defendant alleges were received by plaintiff did not change the income imputed to him during the divorce proceedings.

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Catterson and Moskowitz, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

MAGIC LANTERN GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of

|(1) | The Report fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
    financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated:
    June 2, 2004 | By:              | /s/ Robert A. Goddard                                                                    
|----------------------- | ---------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        | Name:
    Title: | Robert A. Goddard
    Chief
    Executive Officer and 
    Acting Chief Financial Officer
|                        |                 
|                        |
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Interim Report of Lexington Energy Services Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert Rosner, Chief Executive Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the Company.  /s/ Robert Rosner ---------------------- Robert Rosner Chief Executive Officer  October 20, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>



                    IMMUCELL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

                               Exhibit 27.1


            Financial Data Schedule (Filed Only Electronically)




                          Financial Data Schedule
                            IMMUCELL CORPORATION

 THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE ANNUAL PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER
31,  1999  AS  REPORTED  ON  FORM  10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1999

<CASH>                        1,823,688
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                   494,059
<ALLOWANCES>                     40,920
<INVENTORY>                     520,656
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              2,825,309
<PP&E>                        1,661,214
<DEPRECIATION>                  881,384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                3,855,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           605,923
<BONDS>                         434,658
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                      2,815,398
<OTHER-SE>                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  3,855,979
<SALES>                       4,722,374
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              4,909,245
<CGS>                         2,152,959
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 4,294,275
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 24,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               39,757
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 550,843
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             550,843
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                    550,843
<EPS-BASIC>                         .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                       .22



</TABLE>