alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals for the

First District of Texas at Houston

Order on Motion

Cause number: 01-15-00517-CR & 01 -15-00518-CR

Style: John Henry Skillern v. The State ofTexas

Date motion filed*: June 15, 2015

Type ofmotion: Letter-Motion to Expeditethe Filing ofthe Reporter's Record

Party filing motion: Pro se appellant ,

Document to be filed: Reporter's Record

Is appeal accelerated? No.

Ifmotion to extend timeOriginal due date:

Number of extensions granted:

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

• Granted in part

• Denied

0 Dismissed (e.g., want ofjurisdiction, moot)

0 Other:

July 20, 2015

0 Current Due Date: July 20, 2015

N/A

On May 22, 2015, the trial court found appellant to be indigent for the purposes of

hiring an appellate attorney and paying for the appellate records, but counsel was to be

appointed at a later date. On June 8, 2015, after the notice of appeal Was received by

the Clerk ofthis Court on June 5, 2015, the Clerk sent notice to, among others, the

court reporter that the record is due by July 20, 2015. Accordingly, appellant's motion

to expedite the filing ofthe reporter's record is dismissed because the reporter is

responsible for timely filing it by the July 20th deadline, which may be extended if

the reportermakes a requestto this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(b)(3), (c).

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keves

IE] Acting individually • Acting for the Court

Date: June 25, 2015

November 7, 2008 Revision
Sherry Radack

Chief Justice

Terry Jennings

Evelyn Keyes

Laura Carter Higley

Jane Bland

Michael Massengale

Harvey Brown

RebecaHuddle

Russell Lloyd

Justices

Court of Appeals

First District of Texas

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas 77002-2066

Christopher A. Prine

Clerk of the Court

Janet Williams

Chief Staff Attorney

Phone: 713-274-2700

Fax: 713-755-8131

www.txcourts.gov/lstcoa.aspx

Alan Curry

Chief Prosecutor, Appellate Division

Harris County District Attorney's Office

1201 Franklin Ste 600

Houston, TX 77002-1923

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

June 25, 2015

John Henry Skillern

SPN #2747334 (5E1B01X)

1200 Baker Street

Houston, TX 77002

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 01-15-00517-CR Trial Court Case Number: 1436278

Style: John Henry Skillern

v.

The State ofTexas

Oil this date, an order was issued in the above-referenced cause. You may obtain a copy of the Court's

order at http://www.search.txcourts.gov/CaseSearch.aspx?coa=coaO1&s=c.

If you have been required to provide a valid e-mail address to the Court and accept electronic service as

outlined in Rule 9.1(a) and 9.4(g), a copy of this Notice of Distribution will be sent to you electronically via

email.

For more information about a particular case, please visit the Court's website at

http://www.txcourts.gOv/lstCOA.

Sincerely,

&

Christopher A. Prine, Clerk ofthe Court

By Cheryl Roberts, Deputy Clerk

cc: CourtReporter 182nd DistrictCourt(DELIVERED VIAE-MAIL)
Court of Appeals, First District

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas

^

77002-2066
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Scout Acquisition, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott Baily,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Scott Baily
              Scott
                Baily
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              May
                15, 2007
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00295-CV

A. DAVID COURTADE AND IRMA

LEAH ESTRADA-DAVIS A/K/A

LEAH ESTRADA-DAVIS

APPELLANTS

V.

THE GLORIA LOPEZ ESTRADA

FAMILY TRUST, ALEXANDER

ESTRADA, TRUSTEE

APPELLEE

NO. 02-14-00296-CV

IRMA LEAH ESTRADA-DAVIS

A/K/A LEAH ESTRADA-DAVIS

APPELLANT

V.

THE GLORIA LOPEZ ESTRADA

FAMILY TRUST, ALEXANDER

ESTRADA, TRUSTEE

APPELLEE

------------

FROM PROBATE COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 2012-PR02459-1-2, 2012-PR02459-1-2-A

------------

ORDER

------------

We have considered “Appellee’s Motion for Extension of Time to File

Response Brief.”

FILE COPY
The motion is GRANTED. The appellee’s response brief to Leah EstradaDavis’s brief is ordered due Tuesday, September 15, 2015.

The clerk of this court is directed to transmit a copy of this order to

appellant Estrada-Davis and the attorneys of record.

DATED July 14, 2015.

PER CURIAM

2

FILE COPY
Exhibit 32.2




Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alamo Energy Corp. a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Philip Mann, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Alamo Energy Corp., and will be retained by Alamo Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/ Philip MannPhilip Mann

Chief Financial Officer

April 21, 2011









1
#### In the Matter of Robert Krute, Appellant, v Raymond W. Kelly, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

[853 NYS2d 52]

*291Dismissal was an appropriate penalty for the charges and specifications to which petitioner pleaded guilty, namely, that he left the county and city while on sick leave without approval, exaggerated his illness over a one-year period, and engaged in off-duty employment without permission. The Commissioner determined that at the time petitioner was claiming psychological impairments that prevented him from leaving home, he was actively pursuing a privately owned and operated business with substantial monetary gain, which would not have been possible had petitioner been truly impaired, and that the off-duty employment actions were taken without his supervisor’s knowledge, in violation of procedures and at a time when he was excused from all regular duty and assigned to police psychological services. This determination was based solely upon the charged offenses.

The penalty of dismissal, based upon exploitation of petitioner’s condition to further a long-term deception, was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness *(Matter of Ansbro v McGuire,*49 NY2d 872 [1980]).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Gonzalez and Acosta, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7316

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MONTARIUS MURRY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief 

District Judge. (2:11-cr-00073-RBS-FBS-1; 2:13-cv-00389-RBS; 

2:13-cv-00225-RBS-DEM)

Submitted: January 6, 2014 Decided: January 14, 2014

Before MOTZ, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Montarius Murry, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin L. Hatch, Assistant 

United States Attorney, V. Kathleen Dougherty, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Montarius Murry seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Murry has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny his motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate 

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### Arnold *et al. v.*Chesebrough.1

*(Circuit Court, E. D. New York.*

December 13, 1887.)

Pleading—Amendment—Conditions.

When it does not appear that plaintiff's situation has changed for the worse in consequence of defendant's delay in interposing a particular defense,—unless in proceeding to make proof of his case, which he might not have done had the defense been interposed originally,—a motion to amend the answer will be granted, but on payment of taxable costs to the time of the amendment.

In Equity. On motion to amend answer.

*Ilenry A.*llawdiffe, *(John H. V. Arnold,*of counsel,) for complainants.

*Bliss*<fe *Schley,*( *Walter 8. Logan,*of counsel,) for defendant.

1

 Reported by Eu.vvi«rd U. Benedict, Esq., of tbe New York bar.

Lacombe, J.

The practice formerly prevailing in this state of examining into the meritoriousness or morality of defenses sought to be interposed by way of amendment to the answer is no longer valid. *Gilchrist*v. *Gilchrist,*44 How. Pr. 317; *Sheldon*v. *Adams,*41 Barb. 54; *Pike*v. *Bingham.*11 Reporter 750. When law or equity recognizes a defense as proper to be interposed to the plaintiffs’ claim, it should be treated upon a motion of this kind as entitled to the same consideration as any other defense. There is nothing upon the papers to show that plaintiffs’ situation has changed for the worse in consequence of defendant’s delay in interposing this defense, nor that, by reason of the lapse of time, she has lost the opportunity of presenting evidence to defeat the proposed defense which she might have secured had it been interposed when issue was joined. Ivor does it appear that the final disposition of the case will be in any way delayed by the interposition of the defense at Ibis stage of the trial. The plaintiff', however, has proceeded at great length to make proof of her case, which possibly she might not have done had this defense been interposed originally. The defendant’s motion is therefore granted, upon payment of taxable cost to date, including the fees of examiners and stenographers, if any.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew Eckert, Chief Executive Officer of CRC Health Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2011           
|                             
|/s/    ANDREW ECKERT         
|Andrew Eckert                
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CRC Health Corporation and will be retained by CRC Health Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14

                               DAVOX CORPORATION

                      PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                              SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

  Davox Corporation ("Davox") will extend to you a severance package such that,
  in the event of your termination from employment without cause or in the event
  there is a change in control of the company that results in the demotion of
  your title, change in responsibilities, relocation of the company by more than
  fifty (50) miles or removal from the Board of Directors.  Without cause shall
  mean for any reason other than:

     (a)  illegal acts (other than minor traffic violations, misdemeanors, or
          other acts that do not result in criminal conviction) including
          convictions for theft or embezzlement.

     (b)  Material violation of published written policies of the company that
          if broken would have a material negative impact on the company.

     (c)  Irresponsible, unauthorized acts of a willful nature in the
          performance of duties that have a substantial financial impact on the
          company.

     This severance package will provide you with medical / dental benefits
     continuation coverage and compensation at the rate equal to your current
     base salary in effect at the time of such termination, plus an amount equal
     to the actual earned bonus paid during the previous twelve months prior to
     the date of termination.  This compensation and benefits continuation
     (severance package) will be payable for a period of twelve months from the
     date of separation from employment or until such time you acquire other
     employment, whichever comes sooner.

Following the effective date of termination, as set forth in writing and
furnished to you by Davox, your employment with Davox shall cease and you shall
not hold yourself as an employee, agent, or representative of Davox.

Continuation of salary and benefits shall further be subject to your compliance
with any then existing company policies and such other terms as may be in effect
between you and Davox pertaining to the disclosure of confidential or
proprietary information.

Davox has final authority to determine all questions of eligibility to receive
benefits under this arrangement and to interpret and construe the terms of this
arrangement.


Approval:


          /s/ David M. Sample                          March 1, 2001
          -------------------                          ----------------
          President & Chief Executive Officer          Date


          /s/ Alphonse M. Lucchese                     March 1, 2001
          ------------------------                     -------------
          Chairman of the Board                        Date
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXA

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

V «>J

7/15/2015

PRESLEY, RONALD Tr. Ct. No. 31089

The Appellant's Petition for Discretionary Review has this day 

Court requires ten copies of this document to be filed in this offic

days pursuant to Rule 9.3(b). Failure to send copies will result in 

petition.]

A

COA No. 

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CATHY LUSK

1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354

TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Owens-Illinois Group, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that to such officer’s knowledge:

 

(i)the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

|                                    |                                 |
|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| Dated: February 20, 2018 | /s/ Andres A. Lopez                  |
|                                    | Andres A. Lopez                      |
|                                    | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

----

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
NUMBER 13-15-00323-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE THE STATE OF TEXAS EX REL. STEPHEN B. TYLER

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes

Per Curiam Order

Relator, the State of Texas ex rel. Stephen B. Tyler, filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in the above cause on July 15, 2015. Through this original proceeding, relator 

seeks to compel the trial court to vacate the judgment and sentence imposed on July 3, 

2015 and to convene a sentencing hearing before a properly constituted jury. The Court 

requests that the real party in interest, Jaimie Rene Runnels, or any others whose interest 

would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of 

mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See id. R. 

52.2, 52.4, 52.8. 
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

16th day of July, 2015.
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - February 2003 

Benefit payments February 2003 February 2002 

Total $733,541,000 $709,539,000 

Retired employees 466,228,000 449,379,000 

Regular Retirement Spouses and divorced spouses 88,762,000 86,710,000 

and Survivor Benefits Widow(er)s - aged and disabled 156,919,000 152,231,000 

Other survivors 21,632,000 21,219,000 

Number Average1 Number Average1 

Total 636,100 ......... 3,000 ......... ......... 

Regular employee annuities, total 295,500 $1,565 1,200 $2,192 ......... 

Age 213,600 1,529 2 500 2 2,588 3 $975 

Disability, age 65 and over 36,300 1,393 ......... ......... ......... 

Disability, under age 65 45,700 1,872 400 2,193 

Spouses and divorced spouses 149,000 590 800 750 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 162,500 963 800 1,341 

Widowed mothers and fathers 1,100 1,243 4/ 888 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 15,100 642 100 697 

Children 12,800 743 100 989 

Other survivors 100 627 ......... ......... ......... 

Average under 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded in 

month 

Social Security 

Monthly benefits February 2003

Being Paid Awarded 

......... 

......... 

$897 

......... 

631 667 

836 905 

439 324 

......... 

5/ / 

587 617 

849 740 

5

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement. 

Benefit payments 

February February 

2003 2002 Number Average 

$6,061,000 $5,498,000 130,900 $42 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Number Average 

600 $42 

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged35); some 300 

other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis. 

4

Fewer than 50. 

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers. 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

February 2003 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Unemployment 7,100 $257.55 

Sickness 6,800 257.60 

Unemployment 

Sickness 

Average payment 

Per 

full week 

$450.77 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period 

451.36 

February 2003 

Benefit payments 

February 2002 

Total $10,114,000 $9,642,000 

5,906,000 6,504,000 

4,209,000 3,138,000 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding 

Recycled 

Paper 

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary and the Office of Public Affairs
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Magic Lantern Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ron Carlucci, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:  April 25, 2005

/s/ Ron Carlucci

Name:  Ron Carlucci

Title:    Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial and accounting officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pro-Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Pro-Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.