alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                 [LETTERHEAD]

September 8, 1997

Mr. Ed Shoup, FCAS
5677 Heatherton Drive
Somis, CA 93066

Dear Ed:

This letter will document our conversation of September 5, 1997. Superior 
National Insurance Company will offer you the position of Senior Vice 
President and Chief Actuary on the following terms and conditions:

1.   Your affirmative response by the close of business on Friday, September 12,
     1997.
2.   A satisfactory check by Superior on your background and employment history.
3.   Your agreement to commence employment no later than October 1, 1997.
4.   An annual salary of $130,000, payable twice monthly.
5.   An annual cash car allowance of $10,000, payable twice monthly, which is 
     paid in lieu of all mileage reimbursement and other business auto expenses.
6.   Four weeks of vacation annually, subject to Superior's standard 
     carryover and cash-out policies.
7.   Standard benefits package, including:
     a.   Medical, dental, and disability insurance.
     b.   Participation in Superior's 401K plan.
     c.   All other benefit plans enjoyed by executives of comparable rank.
8.   A one year change in control agreement, under which, if you are 
     terminated from employment at Superior as a result of a change in control 
     of the Company only, you will receive your salary and benefits for a 
     period of one year from the date of your termination. The agreement will 
     expire after two years.
9.   Attendance at a reasonable number of Society of Actuary, WCIRB, and 
     other meetings associated with your duties at Superior, the expenses of 
     which will be borne by Superior.
10.  You understand that you will be reporting to me for administrative 
     purposes, but salary and employment issues will be decided jointly by 
     Bill Gentz and me.

We're excited about the prospects of having you join the Company, and look 
forward to your early response.

Very truly yours,



J. Chris Seaman

Copy to Bill Gentz
        Arnold Senter
H. Res. 7 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 3, 2019. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mrs. Lowey, Chair. 

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Yarmuth, Chair. 

COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE: Mr. Pallone, 

Chair. 

COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES: Ms. Waters, 

Chair. 

COMMITTEE ON RULES: Mr. McGovern, Chair. 

COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS: Mr. Neal, Chair. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### BLAIR v. TRAVELERS INS. CO.

No. 5301.

United States District Court W. D. Missouri, W. D.

April 1, 1949.

John W. Hudson, Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff.

Mosman, Rogers, Bell, Field & Gentry Kansas City, Mo., for defendant.

REEVES, Chief Judge.

This motion is entitled “Motion for Production of Documents, Letters, Hospital Records and Reports Concerning Plaintiff’s Claim Against Defendant.”

An examination of the various documents as described in the motion discloses that such documents relate to matters occurring between third parties and to hospital records equally available to plaintiff.

Nearly all the documents sought can be obtained by the plaintiff as easily as they can be obtained by the defendant, and, as indicated, other documents relate to correspondence between third parties. Moreover, no reason is assigned for the production of such documents as contemplated by Rule 34, New Rules of Civil Procedure in Federal Courts, 28 U.S.C.A.

The first item mentioned in the motion consists of:

> “Letters written by plaintiff or plaintiff’s wife to defendant concerning, plaintiff’s claim for insurance in the instant matter.”

No reason appears why plaintiff could not use copies of such letters, if, and when, properly identified.

The second items requested are:

> “Hospital records of Chippewa Falls Wisconsin Hospital concerning plaintiff’s injury in the year 1936.”

In like manner, this can be obtained with equal facility by the pjaintiff.

In the third item,

> “Letter of O. R. Mangum, concerning plaintiff’s loss of vision,”

it does not appear to whom such letter was written, and, obviously, it was a letter written by a third party and would be incompetent as evidence.

And the fourth item,

> “Copies of letters written to Edward L. Scheufler, Superintendent of Insurance of Missouri in 1943 and 1944 concerning plaintiff’s claim.”

There is no statement as to who wrote such letters, and in what way they might be competent. Other requests running to 8 are of the same tenor and effect.

The motion for production of documents should be denied, and it will be so ordered.
****Exhibit 32.2****

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2012 of Santander Holdings USA, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Juan Carlos Alvarez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all in material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Juan Carlos Alvarez                          

Name:  Juan Carlos Alvarez

Title:    Chief Financial Officer, Treasuer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 29 , 2018

NO. 03

- 18

- 00264

- CV

George Green and Garlan Green, Appellant s

v.

Port of Call Homeowners Association; Port of Call Homeowners Association, Inc .; John Ross Buchholtz; Nancy Carothers; Randolph Harig; Phillip Jacobs; Richard Pat McElroy; Christopher Rockwood; Christine Mashay Taylor; Alliance Association Management, Inc.; Jose Balderas; Harold Brown; Sharon Murphy; and Niemann &

Niemann, LLP d/b/a Niemann & Heyer, LLP, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY
BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON, AND BOURLAN D MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED IN PART;
REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART

— OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an a ppeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on September 7, 2016 . Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible

error , but that there was error requiring correction in th at portion of th e trial court’s judgment

conditionally awarding attorneys’ fees to each appellee in the event of an unsuccessful appeal of

the trial court’s rulings on any issue other than the defamation clai m. Therefore, the Court

modifies the trial court ’s judgment to remove that conditional award of attorneys’ fees to each

appellee . Furthermore, the Court holds that there was reversible error in that portion of the trial

court’s judgment dismissing appell ants’ defamation claim against Port of Call HomeownersAssociation, Inc. Therefore, the Court reverses the dismissal of the appellants’ defamation claim

and remand s that issue to the trial court for further proceedings. In all other respects, the

judgmen t of the trial court is affirmed. Each party shall pay the ir own costs relating to this

appeal , both in this Court and in the court below.
#### David Schwartz, Appellant, v Moshe Reisman, Respondent.

[976 NYS2d 883]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sweeney, J.), dated July 16, 2012, which denied the plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 for leave to enter a default judgment against the defendant and granted the defendant’s cross motion pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d) for leave to serve a late answer and to compel the plaintiff to accept service of that answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Inasmuch as the defendant demonstrated a reasonable excuse for his default and a potentially meritorious defense to the action, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 for leave to enter a default judgment against the defendant and in granting the defendant’s cross motion pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d) for leave to serve a late answer and to compel the plaintiff to accept service of that answer *(see Fried v Jacob Holding, Inc.,*110 AD3d 56, 60-62 [2013]; *Kolonkowski v Daily News, L.P.,*94 AD3d 704, 705-706 [2012]; *Harcztark v Drive Variety, Inc.,*21 AD3d 876 [2005]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                5
<CIK>                                                    0000811696
<NAME>                                      SHARPER IMAGE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                1,000
<CURRENCY>                                  U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                       FEB-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                         JAN-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               10873
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        6420
<ALLOWANCES>                                         (505)
<INVENTORY>                                          27365
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     52361
<PP&E>                                               56529
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (33517)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       78804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                42932
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             83
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           28366
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         78804
<SALES>                                              236844
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     210245
<CGS>                                                108799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        209173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     (78)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     8000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   391
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (7241)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (2896)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (4345)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (4345)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.53)
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30664-30665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15130]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property 
at Pocahontas Municipal Airport, Pocahontas, AR

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of request to release airport property.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the 
release of

[[Page 30665]]

land at Pocahontas Municipal Airport under the provisions of Title 49, 
U.S.C. 47153(c).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 27, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to 
the FAA at the following address: Mr. Edward N. Agnew, Manager, Federal 
Aviation Administration, Southwest Region, Airports Division, Arkansas/
Oklahoma Airports Development Office, ASW-630, 2601 Meacham Boulevard, 
Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to The Honorable Gary Crocker, Mayor of Pocahontas, 
at the following address: City of Pocahontas, 410 North Marr, 
Pocahontas, AR 72455.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Paul Burns, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Airports Development Office, ASW-630, 2601 Meacham 
Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
    The request to release property may be reviewed in person at this 
same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the 
request to release property at the Pocahontas Municipal Airport.
    On June 18, 2009, the FAA determined that the request to release 
property at Pocahontas Municipal Airport submitted by the City of 
Pocahontas met the procedural requirements of the Federal Aviation 
Regulations, Part 155. The FAA may approve the request, in whole or in 
part, no later than July 30, 2009.
    The following is a brief overview of the request:
    The City of Pocahontas requests the release of 5.1 acres of airport 
property. The release of property will allow Pinnacle Frames, a local 
manufacturing facility, to improve its existing facilities which are on 
lands previously released by the Federal Aviation Administration. The 
release will also allow the airport to receive, in exchange for the 
5.1-acres tract, a cash payment in the amount of $25,000.00, which the 
City will use for a 2010 capital improvement project to construct 1-
hangars at Pocahontas Municipal Airport.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office 
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the application, 
notice and other documents germane to the application in person at the 
Pocahontas Municipal Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on June 19, 2009.
Lacey D. Spriggs,
Acting Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. E9-15130 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
@article{1207661,
  author = {Yicheng Wang and Dean G. Jarrett and Andrew D. Koffman and Stephan Schlamminger},
  title = {New Method for Determining Time Constant of Resistors},
  year = {2023},
  number = {95},
  month = {2023-03-21 04:03:00},
  publisher = {Review of Scientific Instruments},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936211},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0143225},
  language = {en},
}
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 596 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 596

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 26, 2019.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Education and Labor: Mr. Murphy of North Carolina.
    Committee on Financial Services: Mr. Timmons.
    Committee on Homeland Security: Mr. Bishop of North Carolina.
    Committee on Science, Space, and Technology: Mr. Murphy of North Carolina.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Bishop of North Carolina.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
U.S. Railroad Retirement Board Phone: (312) 751-7139 

844 North Rush Street TTY: (312) 751-4701 Trigger Chicago Illinois, 60611-2092 Web: http://www.rrb.gov of Surcharge in RUIA Tax Rate 

October 16, 2023 

We have recently determined that a surcharge of 0.0 percent will be added to the basic 

RUIA contribution rate for each established employer beginning January 1, 2024. 

There was a 1.5 percent surcharge for 2023. New employers are not affected, as their 

rate will be the average rate for all employers from 2020 through 2022. 

The RUIA Experience Rating System provides for the addition of a surcharge to the 

RUIA contribution rate if the accrual balance in the RUI Account falls below certain 

levels as of June 30 of each year. On June 30, 2023, that account had an accrual 

balance of $363.0 million. The 1.5 percent threshold is the higher of $100 million or 

$100 million indexed to changes in the system compensation base. The current 

thresholds are $150.2 million for the 1.5 percent surcharge and $75.1 million for the 

2.5 percent surcharge. Since the RUI Account balance is greater than the indexed 

amount for $100 million, the surcharge is 0.0 percent for calendar year 2024. 

Official notice of the surcharge was included in the annual rate notices sent out to 

individual employers on October 13, 2023.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dr. Barry W. Karlin, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of CRC Health Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 13, 2007



|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    DR. BARRY W.
KARLIN                                                   
|Dr. Barry W. Karlin                                                          
|Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CRC
Health Corporation and will be retained by CRC Health Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Middle Kingdom Alliance Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q, for the three
month period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Fred A. Brasch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    Fred A. Brasch  
|Fred A. Brasch         
|Chief Financial Officer

November 13, 2008
Dismiss and Opinion Filed March 23, 2022

In the

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-00689-CV

ANGELOS KOLOBOTOS AND KOLOBOTOS PROPERTIES, LLC, 

Appellants

V.

JTREO, INC. AND DAVID BUTTROSS A/K/A DAVID A. BUTTROSS, II, 

Appellees

On Appeal from the 95th District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-07775

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Carlyle, Smith, and Garcia

Opinion by Justice Carlyle

By a January 19, 2022 order, the Court reinstated this appeal and directed 

appellants to file their brief by February 18, 2022. When they did not file a brief, the 

Court notified them by February 28, 2022 postcard that failure to file a brief and 

rule-compliant extension motion within ten days would result in dismissal. Because

appellants have not complied, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 

42.3(b), (c).
–2–

210689f.p05

/Cory L. Carlyle//

CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

ANGELOS KOLOBOTOS AND 

KOLOBOTOS PROPERTIES, LLC, 

Appellants

No. 05-21-00689-CV V.

JTREO, INC. AND DAVID 

BUTTROSS A/K/A DAVID A. 

BUTTROSS, II, Appellees

On Appeal from the 95th District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-07775.

Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle, 

Justices Smith and Garcia 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellees JTREO, Inc. and David Buttross a/k/a David A. 

Buttross, II recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from appellants Angelos 

Kolobotos and Kolobotos Properties, LLC.

Judgment entered this 23rd day of March, 2022.
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.21.3    
  


 
 

AMENDED
  EXHIBIT "A"
  
    To The
  
    GAS PURCHASE CONTRACT
  
    As Of: October 1, 1994
  
    Between
  
    CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION ("BUYER")
  
    and
  

   IGI RESOURCES, INC. ("SELLER")    
  



Effective
Date of this Exhibit "A":  October 1, 2003 


Ending
Date of this Exhibit "A":  March 31, 2004 



	DELIVERY POINT	 	As defined in Section 1.01(g) of the Contract noted above
	 	 	 
	MAXIMUM DAILY CONTRACT QUANTITY(MMBtu)	 	7,446
	 	 	 
	DELIVERY POINT SELLING PRICE	 	1/







	1.
	The
Delivery Point Selling Price shall be equal to four dollars and sixty eight cents [*]U.S. dry) per MMBtu at AECO-C Hub plus the actual cost
of firm NOVA re-delivery service and firm ANG receipt and re-delivery service plus any applicable allowance for fuel-in-kind associated with such
services. 




[*] = Confidential Information




	 	 	"BUYER"

CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	 	/s/ King Oberg

	 	 	Name:	 	King Oberg

	 	 	Title:	 	Vice President, Gas Supply

	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	"SELLER"

IGI RESOURCES, INC.
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	 	/s/ Randy Schultz

	 	 	Name:	 	Randy Schultz

	 	 	Title:	 	President












QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.21.3


AMENDED EXHIBIT "A" To The GAS PURCHASE CONTRACT As Of: October 1, 1994 Between CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION ("BUYER") and IGI RESOURCES, INC. ("SELLER")