alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.12
 Sovereign Bancorp, Inc.
1996 Stock Option Plan




---



##### 



Article
    
    Page No.ARTICLE 1. PURPOSE OF THE PLAN
    
    1ARTICLE 2. DEFINITIONS
    
    1ARTICLE 3. ADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN
    
    4ARTICLE 4. COMMON STOCK SUBJECT TO THE PLAN
    
    5ARTICLE 5. STOCK OPTIONS
    
    5ARTICLE 6. ELIGIBILITY
    
    6ARTICLE 7. TERM, EXERCISE AND TRANSFER OF OPTIONS
    
    6ARTICLE 8. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT
    
    8ARTICLE 9. ADJUSTMENT PROVISIONS
    
    10ARTICLE 10. GENERAL PROVISIONS
    
    11
 i




---



##### 



ARTICLE 1. PURPOSE OF THE PLAN
 Purpose
 Stock Options to be Granted
 ARTICLE 2. DEFINITIONS
 Agreement
 Board
 Change in Control
     1




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



Code
 Committee
 Common Stock
 Corporation
 Employee
 Exchange Act
 Incentive Stock Option
 Nonqualified Stock Option
 Optionee
 Participant
 Plan
 Retirement
 Securities Act
 Stock Option Option
 3




---



##### 



Subsidiary
 ARTICLE 3. ADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN
 The Committee
 Powers of the Committee
          4




---



##### 



Terms
 Liability
 ARTICLE 4. COMMON STOCK SUBJECT TO THE PLAN
 Common Stock Authorized
 Shares Available
 ARTICLE 5. STOCK OPTIONS
 Exercise Price
 Limitation on Incentive Stock Options
 Determination of Fair Market Value
  5




---



##### 



Limitation on Grants
 ARTICLE 6. ELIGIBILITY
 Participation
 Incentive Stock Option Eligibility
 ARTICLE 7. TERM, EXERCISE AND TRANSFER OF OPTIONS
 Termination
 6




---



##### 



Exercise and Transfer
     7
        ARTICLE 8. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT
 Retirement
   Death or Total and Permanent Disability
 Other Termination
    8




---



##### 



Termination For Cause
        9




---



##### 



ARTICLE 9. ADJUSTMENT PROVISIONS
 Share Adjustments
    Corporate Changes
 Fractional Shares
 Binding Determination
 10




---



##### 



ARTICLE 10. GENERAL PROVISIONS
 Effective Date
 Termination of the Plan
 Limitation on Termination, Amendment or Modification
      No Right to Employment
 Withholding Taxes
   11




---



##### 



Listing and Registration of Shares
    12




---



##### 



13
Exhibit 32.1

MAGIC LANTERN GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of

|(1) | The Report fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
    financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated:
    April 14, 2004 | By:              | /s/ Robert A. Goddard                                                                    
|------------------------- | ---------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                          | Name:
    Title: | Robert A. Goddard
    Chief
    Executive Officer and 
    Acting Chief Financial Officer
|                          |                 
|                          |
@article{1210691,
  author = {Romain Coulon and Denis E. Bergeron and Jeffrey T. Cessna and Ryan P. Fitzgerald and Lizbeth Laureano-Perez and Leticia Pibida and International Collaboration},
  title = {The international reference system for beta-particle emitting radionuclides: Validation through the pilot study CCRI(II)-P1.Co-60},
  year = {2023},
  number = {200},
  month = {2023-07-26 04:07:00},
  publisher = {Applied Radiation and Isotopes},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936920},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.110945},
  language = {en},
}
Order entered July 23, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00547-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.V.K, A CHILD

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-12-19679

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart

Before the Court is appellee’s motion to clarify, amend, or modify the Court’s June 24, 

2015 judgment to “specify the dollar amount of the costs awarded to Appellee in conformity 

with the itemized cost statement totaling $6, 188.58.” We DENY the motion. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 51.1 (setting forth procedure for taxation of appellate costs); TEX. R. CIV. P. 125 –149 (setting 

forth procedures related to costs); TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 31.007 (setting forth 

permissible costs); see also Pitts v. Dallas County Bail Bond Bd., 23 S.W.3d 407, 417 (Tex. 

App.—Amarillo 2000, pet. denied) (“In response to a request for an award of costs, the court's 

role is to determine which party or parties is to bear the costs of court, not to adjudicate the 

correctness of specific items.”)

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Globalink, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Robin Young
                                 ----------------------
                                 Robin Young
                                 Chief Executive Officer

November 10, 2008

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Globalink, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Ben Choi
                                 ----------------------
                                 Ben Choi
                                 Chief Executive Officer

November 10, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>  0000811664                       
<NAME>  WORLDCORP, INC             
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         14,509
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  25,675
<ALLOWANCES>                                   413
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               48,998
<PP&E>                                         86,830
<DEPRECIATION>                                 21,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 176,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          89,306
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       16,617
<OTHER-SE>                                     56,954
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   176,363
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               313,672
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  310,935
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (5,772)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             11,680
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                7,941
<INCOME-TAX>                                   504
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            7,437
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (19,191)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,754)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Justin Wornell, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 175]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), rendered March 8, 2012, convicting him of rape in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is based on matter dehors the record and, therefore, cannot be reviewed on direct appeal *(see People v Nugent,*109 AD3d 625 [2013]; *People v Miller,*68 AD3d 1135 [2009]; *People v Shemack,*46 AD3d 582, 583 [2007]). The defendant’s related claim that the alleged ineffective assistance of counsel rendered his plea unknowing, unintelligent, and involuntary is also based on matter dehors the record and, thus, cannot be reviewed on direct appeal *(see People v Morrison,*51 AD3d 1041 [2008]; *People v DeLuca,*45 AD3d 777 [2007]). Rivera, J.E, Hall, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.

Motion by the respondent, inter alia, to strike stated portions of the record and the appellant’s brief on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered March 8, 2012, on the ground that the record contains matter dehors the record and the brief refers to matter dehors the record. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated July 2, 2013, that branch of the motion which is to strike from the record the affidavits on pages 59 through 62 of the record and those portions of the brief which refer to those affidavits was held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the submission of the appeal, it is

Ordered that the branch of the motion which is to strike from the record the affidavits on pages 59 through 62 of the record and those portions of the brief which refer to those affidavits is granted, and those portions of the record and the appellant’s brief are stricken and have not been considered on the appeal *(see People v DeLuca,*45 AD3d 777 [2007]). Rivera, J.E, Hall, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14818]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 02/72-0625]


Founders Equity SBIC I, L.P.; Notice Seeking Exemption Under 
Section 312 of the Small Business Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that Founders Equity SBIC I, L.P., 711 Fifth 
Avenue, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10022, a Federal Licensee under the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (``the Act''), in 
connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an 
exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings 
which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business 
Administration (``SBA'') Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). 
Founders Equity SBIC I, L.P. proposes to provide equity security 
financing to Advantedge Healthcare Holdings, Inc., 30 Technology Drive, 
Warren, NJ 07059. The financing will provide the company with 
additional capital to fund its acquisition program and working capital 
requirements.
    The financing is brought within the purview of Sec.  107.730(a) of 
the Regulations because Founders Equity NY, L.P., an Associate of 
Founders Equity SBIC I, L.P., owns more than ten percent of Advantedge 
Healthcare Holdings, Inc., and therefore Advantedge Healthcare 
Holdings, Inc. is considered an Associate of Founders Equity SBIC I, 
L.P. as defined in Sec.  107.50 of the Regulations.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator for 
Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20416.

    June 4, 2009.
Harry Haskins,
Acting Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. E9-14818 Filed 6-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15I0189. RHONDA JOHNSON v. THE STATE.

Rhonda Johnson filed an application for interlocutory appeal seeking

immediate review of the trial court’s order denying a motion to suppress. We

dismissed the application because the order and certificate of immediate review were

signed by different judges. Johnson filed a motion for reconsideration, submitting

evidence that the judge who signed the order was not the trial judge, but was sitting

by designation on the day the motion to suppress was heard. Under these

circumstances,Johnson has shown that its certificate of immediate review was valid. 

See Freemon v. Dubroca, 177 Ga. App. 745 (1) (341 SE2d 276) (1986).

Accordingly,Johnson’smotion forreconsideration is GRANTED.This Court’s

prior order dismissing the application is VACATED, and the application is

REINSTATED. Upon consideration of the merits, however, the application is hereby

DENIED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/09/2015

July 09, 2015
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

E8 PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC AND THE 

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v.

AFFYMETRIX, INC. AND NAVIGENICS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________ 

2013-1046

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Massachusetts in consolidated No. 08-CV11132, Judge George A. O'Toole, Jr.

______________________ 

Decided: November 6, 2013

______________________ 

JOHN B. WYSS, Wiley Rein LLP, of Washington, DC, 

argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief 

were JAMES H. WALLACE, JR., MARK A. PACELLA, and 

GREGORY R. LYONS. 

PETER E. ROOT, Kaye Scholer LLP, of Palo Alto, California, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the 

brief were MICHAEL J. MALECEK, SEAN M. BOYLE, and 

GARY ROSS ALLEN. 
2 E8 PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC v. AFFYMETRIX, INC. 

______________________ 

Before LOURIE, DYK, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. 

We affirm the judgment of noninfringement in favor 

of Affymetrix, Inc. and Navigenics, Inc. We base our 

decision solely on our agreement with the district court’s 

construction of the phrase “randomly primed PCR-derived 

RCG.” We do not reach any other issues raised on appeal.

AFFIRMED
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6327** 

LEWIS WELSH , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.
LEROY CARTLEDGE, Warden , Respondent

– Appellee,

and
ALAN WILSON, Attorney General , Respondent

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Mary G. Lewis , District Judge. ( 4:13

- cv
- 00296

- MGL )

Submitted : June 26 , 2014 Decided: Ju ne 30 , 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Lewis Welsh, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General , Alphonso Simon, Jr., Assistant Attorney General , Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are n ot binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Lewis Welsh seeks to appeal the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and
granting summary judgment for Respondent on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(2012) petition . We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction
because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thir ty days after the entry of

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal,
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless th e district court extends
the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely
filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket

on January 24, 2014 . The notice of appeal was filed on February

26 , 2014

. * Because Welsh failed to file a timely notice of
appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal
period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988).3 in the materials before th is cour t and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SGS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the
Report), the undersigned each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                |  |                                                
|--------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|August 14, 2006 |  | /s/ HENRY R. BAUGHMAN                          
|                |  | Henry R. Baughman                              
|                |  | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
|                | 
|August 14, 2006 |  | /s/ James M. Dahmus                            
|                |  | James M. Dahmus                                
|                |  | Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 7, 2022

No. 04-22-00152-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Q.M.C., A CHILD

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021PA00761

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On March 23, 2022, we ordered appellant to file a response showing cause why this 

appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We also suspended the deadlines in this 

matter. On March 24, 2022, appellant filed a response indicating the district clerk would be 

preparing a supplemental clerk’s record with a copy of the final order of termination to establish 

our jurisdiction. The next day, the district clerk filed the supplemental clerk’s record.

Accordingly, because we now have jurisdiction over this matter, we reinstate the appellate

deadlines.

At this time, the notification of late record filed by the court reporter on March 24, 2022 

is pending, and the court reporter filed the reporter’s record on April 6, 2022. We therefore 

grant the requested extension and deem the reporter’s record as timely filed. The appellant’s 

brief is due by April 18, 2022.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of April, 2022.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
# Result 3.3
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                            <C>                                                      <C>
                                                                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.1

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


      -----NUMBER-----                                                                                    -----SHARES-----
        SV
      ----------------                         SUPER VISION INTERNATIONAL, INC.                           ----------------

                                                                                                          CUSIP 868042 10 2

  INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS                                                                              SEE REVERSE FOR
    OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                                                             CERTAIN DEFINITIONS


           THIS CERTIFIES THAT



           is the owner of


              FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK OF THE PAR VALUE OF $.001 PER SHARE OF

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------- SUPER VISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. -----------------------------------------------
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney, upon surrender of
 this Certificate, properly endorsed.
          This Certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.
          WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.
                                                    [CERTIFICATE OF STOCK]

 Dated:

                                                       [CORPORATE SEAL]

                                     SECRETARY                                                                PRESIDENT

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


                            COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
                                  AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY
                                            (NEW YORK, N.Y.)     TRANSFER AGENT
                            BY                                    AND REGISTRAR

                                                             AUTHORIZED OFFICER