alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                      This   schedule    contains   summary    financial
                              information extracted from Barringer  Technologies
                              Inc.'s   Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year  ended
                              December 31, 1995 and is qualified in its entirety
                              by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                            43
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                      41
<INVENTORY>                                     1,621
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                3,672
<PP&E>                                          2,101
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,515
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  4,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,302
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                       616
<COMMON>                                           35
<OTHER-SE>                                        674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    4,735
<SALES>                                         6,374
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                6,374
<CGS>                                           3,601
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   3,601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                3,711
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                240
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,178)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,178)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    351
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (827)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.28)



</TABLE>
IMMUCELL CORPORATION

EXHIBIT 10.6

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

IMMUCELL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the Company), and MICHAEL F. BRIGHAM, an individual residing in
Kennebunk, Maine (Brigham), hereby agree as follows as of this 26th day of March 2010.

1.        This agreement supersedes and replaces in its entirety the Employment Agreement, dated as of April 29, 1999, between the Company and Brigham. This agreement, together with the
Confidential Information, Inventions and Noncompete Agreement, dated of even date herewith, between the Company and Brigham and any stock option agreements previously entered into between the Company and Brigham, constitute the parties entire
understanding with respect to Brighams employment by the Company.

2.        Brigham shall serve as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in an at will capacity on such terms as the Board of Directors of the Company may from time to time
determine, subject to termination by the Board of Directors of the Company at any time, with or without cause.

IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement, intending the same to take effect as a sealed instrument, as of the date first above written.



IMMUCELL CORPORATIONBy:

/s/ Linda RhodesDr. Linda RhodesChair of Compensation andStock Option Committee/s/

Michael F. BrighamMichael F. Brigham
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Camron Erby, Appellant.

[977 NYS2d 663]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered on or about June 23, 2011, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Concur — Tom, J.R, Saxe, DeGrasse, Richter and Clark, JJ.
#### Rose et al., Appellees, *v.*City of Garfield Heights et al.; Clarendon National Insurance Company, Appellant.

[Cite as *Rose v. Garfield Hts.,*Ill Ohio St.3d 1209, 2006-Ohio-5698.]

(No. 2005-1828

Submitted September 20, 2006

Decided November 15, 2006.)

Yulish, Twohig & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Gerald R. Horning, for appellees.

Reminger & Reminger Co., L.P.A., and Amy S. Thomas, for appellant.

Paul L. Cox, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Fraternal Order of Police of Ohio. Inc.

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

{¶ 2} The court orders that the opinion of the court of appeals may not be cited as authority except by the parties inter se.

Moyer, C.J., Boggins, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

John F. Boggins, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for Resnick, J.
<Page>

                                                                EXHIBIT 10.42(c)

          PriceSmart, Inc.                                      [Memorandum]
          4649 Morena Blvd.
          San Diego, CA  92117
          Tel 858 581-7485
          Fax 858 581-4707

PriceSmart [Logo]




          To:     Bill Naylon

          From:   Bob Gans /s/ BG

          Re:     SALARY INCREASE

          Date:   October 16, 2001




          With reference to your Employment Agreement, this Memorandum will
          confirm that effective September 1, 2001, your annual base salary
          increased by $22,500, to $181,500.
Motion Granted and Order filed July 16, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00111-CR

____________

LEIROI MICKELE DANIELS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1399598

ORDER

Appellant is represented by retained counsel, Heather Lytle. Appellant’s 

brief was originally due April 24, 2015. No brief has been filed. On July 3, 2015, 

counsel filed a motion for extension of time until August 3, 2015, to file 

appellant’s brief. Because we conclude counsel alleged exceptional circumstances, 

the motion is granted.
Accordingly, we order Heather Lytle to file a brief with the clerk of this 

court on or before August 3, 2015. No further extensions will be entertained absent 

exceptional circumstances. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Christopher, Brown and Wise
S06Y0305.

#### IN THE MATTER OF DAKEER A. FARRAR.

(621 SE2d 741)

Per curiam.

This disciplinary proceeding is before the Court on the report and recommendation of the special master that Respondent Dakeer A. Farrar be disbarred for violating Rule 8.4 (a) (2) of Bar Rule 4-102 (d) by pleading guilty in the Superior Court of Douglas County on June 6,2005 to three counts of unlawful use of a communication device and one count each of the sale of marijuana, the sale of methylenedioxymethamphetamine, and trafficking in cocaine. Farrar acknowledged service of the petition for appointment of the special master and in accordance with Bar Rule 4-106, the special master conducted a hearing, at which Farrar did not appear.

We agree with the special master that Farrar violated his duty to the public and the legal system; that he knew he was engaging in *870illegal and dishonest conduct; and that the public and legal system sustained serious or potentially serious injury as a result of Farrar’s crimes and convictions. We find in aggravation of discipline that Farrar had multiple offenses, and that there were no mitigating circumstances. Accordingly, we hereby order that the name of Dakeer A. Farrar be removed from the rolls of attorneys authorized to practice law in the State of Georgia. He is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Decided November 7, 2005.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, K. Gene Chapman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*Disbarred.*

*All the Justices concur.*
H. Res. 650 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 23, 2019. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 4617) to amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 

1971 to clarify the obligation to report acts of foreign election influence and require implementation of compliance and 

reporting systems by Federal campaigns to detect and report 

such acts, and for other purposes. The first reading of the 

bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided 

and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on House Administration. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the 

five-minute rule. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of 

a substitute recommended by the Committee on House Administration now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to 
2 

•HRES 650 EH 

consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment 

under the five-minute rule an amendment in the nature of a 

substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 

116–35 modified by the amendment printed in part A of the 

report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. That amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be 

considered as read. All points of order against that amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. No amendment 

to that amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in 

order except those printed in part B of the report of the 

Committee on Rules. Each such amendment may be offered 

only in the order printed in the report, may be offered only 

by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as 

read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report 

equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be 

subject to a demand for division of the question in the House 

or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order against 

such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and 

report the bill to the House with such amendments as may 

have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote 

in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee 

of the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature 

of a substitute made in order as original text. The previous 
3 

•HRES 650 EH 

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### L&L Associates Holding Corp., Respondent, v Joseph A.F. Sadowski, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Submitted January 14, 2013;

decided February 19, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
# 0 .:

* -./ . ..
**OFFICE OF**  **THE Al-l-ORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AU8lYN** 

Bonomblo K. Lsr O'Du~ial Oorunor of Tons Aurtln, Toxso Dorr Cotrrnor O*Danirl

lou rrpurrt our bo rll~blr to urn. **Authorlt~** artor a n& thr tomlnat1on **moabsrrhlp tith** 

**bo** oll~blo ter .uul-lng tho pnl l p~olntwnt J m otor

whatsootu.” 

## at. m omI 0 r o,



## rt (aa

Ulrootor,t&at tum 08 u8ed in thm Aot rroatlng thlr rutboAt)-. Furthermore, r, do not wimh our Opinion Ho. 0-lT83 to km oonoldued a# 

### baring parred upon that quortion. . m(RH, ma 18, la40 (I) 

### @oral6 C. Yann ATTORHBTOlKNBlUL

MTSXX Toum vary truly

hTToFlnsTmmRALOTnxA~

AFPROVXD 0PmI0H c-t By B.U.B. Chalnrn
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Each of the undersigned officers of Cleopatra International Group, Inc.. (the "Company") hereby certifies that, to his or her knowledge, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K to which this certification is attached (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Yongping XuYongping Xu, Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer) /s/ Zheyong HeZheyong He, Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) April 15, 2011
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification**I, Teresa L. Martin, CFO, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FGBC Bancshares, Inc.2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: November 13, 2006     /s/ Teresa L. Martin     Teresa L. Martin  Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [WY-923-1310-FI; WYW164394]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(2), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement from Rancher Energy Corp for Competitive oil and gas lease WYW164394 for land in Converse County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Julie L. Weaver, Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year, and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW164394 effective October 1, 2008, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.                

Julie L. Weaver,

Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication.

[FR Doc. E9-15651 Filed 7-1-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cannabis Sativa, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, as filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Mike Gravel, Principal Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

Dated:  August 14, 2018

 

           

/s/ Mike Gravel

Mike Gravel

Principal Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kevin Hogge, Chief Financial Officer of CRC Health Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 21, 2006

|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|/s/    KEVIN HOGGE                                                                                
|Kevin Hogge Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CRC
Health Corporation and will be retained by CRC Health Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 12, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

134750 Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. ERIC A. BRAVER MAN, Successor Stephen J. Markman, Personal Representative of the Estate Justices of Patricia Sw ann, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 134750 COA: 264091 Wayne CC: 05-502345-NH GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL, a/k/a GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL, OSTEOPATHIC, Defendant-Appellant, and

JOHN R. SCHAIRER, D.O., GARY YASHINSKY, M.D., ABHINAV RAINA, M.D., and PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTERS, INC., Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2007 judgment of the Court of App eals is considered and, it app earing to this Court that the

case of Braverman v Garden City Hospital (Docket Nos. 134445-1 34446) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leav e to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the deci sion in that case.

l1009 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 12, 2007

Clerk
J. 

order. See Pan, 120 Nev. at 229, 88 P.3d at 844 ("If essential information 

is left out of the petition and accompanying documentation, we have no 

way of properly evaluating the petition."). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

Saitta 

J. 

Gibbons 

cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge 

James W. Kwon 

Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(01 1947A e