alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 82 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 82

  Establishing the Congressional Gold Star Fellowship Program for the 
  placement in offices of Members of the House of Representatives of 
children, spouses, and siblings of members of the Armed Forces who are 
  hostile casualties or who have died from a training-related injury.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2019

Mr. Kelly of Mississippi submitted the following resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Establishing the Congressional Gold Star Fellowship Program for the 
  placement in offices of Members of the House of Representatives of 
children, spouses, and siblings of members of the Armed Forces who are 
  hostile casualties or who have died from a training-related injury.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL GOLD STAR FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM.

    (a) Establishment.--There is established in the House of 
Representatives the Congressional Gold Star Fellowship Program 
(hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Program'') under 
which, under the direction of the Chief Administrative Officer of the 
House of Representatives, an eligible individual may serve a 12-month 
fellowship in the office of a Member of the House of Representatives 
(including a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to the Congress).
    (b) Exclusion of Appointees for Purposes of Limit on Number of 
Employees in Member Offices.--Any individual serving a fellowship under 
the Program in the office of a Member shall not be included in the 
determination of the number of employees employed by the Member under 
section 104(a) of the House of Representatives Administrative Reform 
Technical Corrections Act (2 U.S.C. 5321(a)).
    (c) Placement in Member Offices in District of Columbia or 
Congressional District of Member.--An individual may serve a fellowship 
under the Program at the Member's office in the District of Columbia or 
the Member's office in the congressional district the Member 
represents.
    (d) Eligibility.--
            (1) In general.--An individual is eligible to serve a 
        fellowship under the Program if the individual is the child 
        (including a stepchild), spouse, or sibling of a member of the 
        Armed Forces who is a hostile casualty or died from a training-
        related injury.
            (2) Definitions.--In this subsection, the terms ``hostile 
        casualty'' and ``training-related injury'' have the meanings 
        given those terms in section 2402(b) of title 38, United States 
        Code.
    (e) Regulations.--The Program shall be carried out in accordance 
with regulations promulgated by the Committee on House Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Labor Employer Reporting Instructions 

Part V - Reports of Creditable Service and Compensation 

Chapter 10: Records Retention Requirement 

Retention Requirements 

Employers are required (20 CFR 209.16) to retain payroll records on which service and 

compensation reports are based for five years after the due date of the compensation report or the 

date that the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act contribution to which they relate is paid, 

whichever is later. For example, the payroll records for 2006 (for which compensation was due 

to be reported by the last day of February 2007) are to be retained until March 1, 2012. 

Exception 

In the event of a dispute of the compensation report, the records must be retained as long as the 

dispute is held open. Disputes include any requests from the RRB for reconciliation of report 

data that were made within the five-year period and which remain outstanding. 

1
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE>                     5                      
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            Dec-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   26
<PP&E>                                         27,258
<DEPRECIATION>                                 10,574
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 16,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,330
<BONDS>                                        14,685
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        1,262
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,804
<SALES>                                         2,660
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                2,730
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,336
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (179)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (179)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (179)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Henry R. Baughman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SGS International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                  |  |                                                
|----------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|November 13, 2006 |  | /s/ HENRY R. BAUGHMAN                          
|                  |  | Henry R. Baughman                              
|                  |  | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND THE AUDITED  CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
OF  THE  REGISTRANT  AS OF AND  FOR  THE  YEAR  ENDED  DECEMBER  31,  1998,
RESPECTIVELY,  AND IS QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS. AMOUNTS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         37,912
<SECURITIES>                                   9,712
<RECEIVABLES>                                  236,023
<ALLOWANCES>                                   18,724
<INVENTORY>                                    111,734
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               439,124
<PP&E>                                         503,745
<DEPRECIATION>                                 290,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 755,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          174,909
<BONDS>                                        109,757
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       21,956
<OTHER-SE>                                     445,341
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   755,729
<SALES>                                        1,059,669
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,079,498
<CGS>                                          653,301
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  653,301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               315,912
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               8,460
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             10,772
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                99,513
<INCOME-TAX>                                   40,194
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            59,319
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   59,319
<EPS-BASIC>                                  2.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.63


</TABLE>
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Holloway, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Holloway,*111 Ohio St.3d 496, 2006-Ohio-6114.]

(No. 2006-1331

Submitted October 3, 2006

Decided December 6, 2006.)

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *Watkins v. Collins,*111 Ohio St.3d 425, 2006-Ohio-5082, 857 N.E.2d 78.

*497William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Pamela Bolton, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Paul Mancino Jr., for appellee.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.

Lanzinger, J., dissents.
**ESCO,
      INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**









In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ESCO, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William T. Foley,
      President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
      William T. Foley


William
      T. Foley


President
      and Chief Financial Officer




June
      23,
      2006




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      ESCO, Inc. and will be retained by ESCO, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Disciplinary Counsel *v.*Wheatley.

[Cite as *Disciplinary Counsel v. Wheatley,*111 Ohio St.3d 1202, 2006-Ohio-5085.]

(No. 2005-0349

Submitted September 14, 2006

Decided September 21, 2006.)

On Application for Reinstatement.

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Myron Daniel Wheatley, Attorney Registration No. 0038584, last known business address in Madison, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 14, 2005, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if the Clients’ Security Fund awards any amount against the respondent pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), the respondent shall reimburse that amount to the Clients’ Security Fund within 90 days of the notice of such award.

(¶ 5} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

*1203{¶ 6} For earlier case, see *Disciplinary Counsel v. Wheatley,*107 Ohio St.3d 224, 2005-Ohio-6266, 837 N.E.2d 1188.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Russell A. Olson, Chief Financial Officer of Intcomex, Inc. (the Company), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 14, 2008



/s/ Russell A. OlsonRussell A. OlsonChief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 10, 2015

d0603

Order 

Clerk

June 10, 2015

150891

EARL H. ALLARD, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 150891

COA: 308194

Wayne CC: 10-110358-DM

CHRISTINE A. ALLARD,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 18, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether MCL 552.23 and MCL 552.401 are 

inapplicable where the parties entered into an antenuptial agreement; and (2) whether the 

real estate held by the plaintiff’s limited liability companies, including the marital home,

and any income generated by those properties, could be treated as marital assets and, if 

so, under what conditions. 

The Business Law and Family Law Sections of the State Bar of Michigan are 

invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the 

determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to 

file briefs amicus curiae.
S05A1292, S05A1293.

#### KAPPELMEIER v. WINEGARDEN (two cases).

(621 SE2d 452)

Thompson, Justice.

Gottfried A. Kappelmeier brought this mandamus action against Judge Richard T. Winegarden, seeking an order directing the judge to vacate the judgment he entered against Kappelmeier in another case. Judge Winegarden moved to dismiss the petition and Judge Debra K. Turner granted the motion. Three weeks later, Kappelmeier filed an “emergency motion” to recuse Judge Turner. The motion was denied and Kappelmeier appealed. We find no error and affirm.

1. An extraordinary writ, such as a writ of mandamus, does not lie to compel a judge to vacate an order or judgment where there is a right to judicial review of the judge’s ruling. *Ford Motor Co. v. Lawrence,*279 Ga. 284, 285 (612 SE2d 301) (2005); *Kappelmeier v. Iannazzone,*279 Ga. 131 (2) (610 SE2d 60) (2005). It follows that the superior court did not err in dismissing the petition and refusing to grant a mandamus nisi.

2. The superior court was not required to render findings of fact and conclusions of law in dismissing the petition for mandamus. *Kappelmeier v. Iannazzone,*supra at 132 (3).

3. Kappelmeier contends Judge Turner erred in denying the motion to recuse without referring the matter to another judge for a hearing. We disagree. “When a motion to recuse is [presented, the judge can rule on] the timeliness of the motion and the legal sufficiency of the affidavit,” *Birt v. State,*256 Ga. 483, 484 (1) (350 SE2d 241) (1986), and, “it is as much the duty of a judge not to grant the motion to recuse when the motion is legally insufficient as it is to recuse when the motion is meritorious.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) *Henderson v. McVay,*269 Ga. 7, 9 (2) (494 SE2d 653) (1998).

Uniform Superior Court Rule 25.1 requires that a motion to recuse be filed within five days after first learning of the facts for recusal, and not later than ten days before a hearing or trial, unless good cause is shown for the failure to meet the time requirements. In this case, the motion was untimely because it was filed three weeks after Judge Turner ruled on the motion to dismiss and Kappelmeier offered no reason for the delay. Moreover, the motion was not supported by facts which would lead a reasonable person to conclude that Judge Turner harbored a bias, which stemmed from an extrajudicial source, and which interfered with an impartial judgment. See *Berry v. State,*267 Ga. 605, 607 (3) (481 SE2d 203) (1997); *McBride v. State,*213 Ga. App. 857, 859 (4) (446 SE2d 193) (1994).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*875Decided October 24, 2005

Reconsideration denied November 21, 2005.

Gottfried A. Kappelmeier, *pro se.*

*Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Rebecca S. Mick, Kristin L. Miller, Assistant Attorneys General,*for appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) The
financial statements contained in the Registrant's Form 10-KSB for the year
ended June 30, 1997.
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         335,121
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                    24,000
<INVENTORY>                                     72,357
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               508,411
<PP&E>                                          50,837
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,669
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 575,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,765
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,997,850
<COMMON>                                       724,196
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   575,346
<SALES>                                        215,561
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               215,561
<CGS>                                           96,951
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   96,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,967
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (697,311)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (697,311)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                144,009
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (841,320)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        







</TABLE>