alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Railroad Retirement Board 

U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

844 North Rush Street 

Chicago Illinois, 60611-1275 

 

 

Phone: (312) 751-4992

TTY: (312) 751-4701

Web: https://www.rrb.gov/ 

Worksheet for Computing Excess Railroad Retirement Taxes Withheld in 2019

If you worked for two or more employers in 2019, and your total earnings exceeded $98,700, too much tax may have been 

withheld. This worksheet was developed to help you determine and claim credit for the excess taxes being collected. If more 

than the maximum tax was withheld by a single employer, you must contact your employer for a refund. There is a new 

procedure that must be followed to claim excess tax credits from the IRS.

To claim credit for excess Tier I taxes being collected, you must use your 2019 Form 1040 income tax return. To claim 

credit for excess Tier II taxes, being collected, you must submit IRS Form 843.

1. Add all social security and Tier I RRTA tax shown on Forms W-2 from all employers 

(not counting more than $8,239.80 for each employer.) Enter the sum in area 1c.

1a. Amount of Tier I tax 

withheld by Employer #1 + 1b. Amount of Tier I tax withheld by Employer #2 = 1c. Total amount of Tier I tax withheld

2. Show Tier I RRTA tax on any unreported tips on Line 5 of IRS 

Form 1040 Schedule 2. Also include any uncollected Tier I tax on 

group-term life insurance. Uncollected tax (UT) is shown in Item 12

of IRS Form W-2.

2. Total Tier I tax 

uncollected

3. Add the amounts shown in areas 1c and 2. Enter the sum in 3. (If 

the amount is $8,239.80 or less, enter “0" in box 5 and go to line 6.)

3. Total of 1c and 2

4. Employee 2019 RRTA Tier I tax limit. 4. $8,239.80

5. Subtract line 4 from line 3. Enter the remainder, which is your excess Tier I tax. This is the amount

of tax credit which should be entered on Line 15 of IRS Form 1040.

5.

6. Add Tier II RRTA tax from Forms W-2 from all employers (not counting more than $4,836.30 for 

each employer.) Enter the sum in area 6c.

6a. Amount of Tier II tax 

withheld by Employer #1 + 6b. Amount of Tier II tax withheld by Employer #2 = 6c. Total amount of Tier II tax withheld

7. Show Tier II RRTA tax on any unreported tips on Line 5 of IRS 

Form 1040 Schedule 2. Also include any uncollected Tier II tax on 

group-term life insurance. Uncollected tax (UT) is shown in Item 12

of IRS Form W-2.

7. Total Tier II tax 

uncollected

8. Add the amounts in 6c and 7. Enter the sum in 8. If the amount is 

$4,836.30 or less, no excess tax has been withheld.

8. Sum of 6c and 7

9. Employee 2019 RRTA Tier 2 tax limit. 9. $4,836.30

10. Subtract line 9 from line 8. Enter the remainder, which is your excess Tier II tax. This is the amount

of tax credit which should be entered in item 2 of IRS Form 843.

10.

For updated worksheets, call the Railroad Retirement Board’s Quality Reporting Service Center at (312) 751-4992.

For more information, see IRS publication 505

(Rev. 01/2020)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-71,340]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on June 22, 2009, in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at Bowne of Detroit, 610 West Congress, Detroit, Michigan.

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition filed on June 9, 2009 (instituted on June 10, 2009) that is the subject of an ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued (TA-W-71,137; Bowne, 610 West Congress, Detroit, Michigan). Further investigation in this case would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose; therefore the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of June 2009.

 Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-15742 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1190

JAMES WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GIANT OF MARYLAND, LLC, 

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13-

cv-02599-PWG)

Submitted: July 21, 2015 Decided: July 23, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dmitry Balannik, TOUCHSTONE LAW FIRM, LLC, Rockville, Maryland for 

Appellant. Marianne Hogan, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, 

Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

James Washington appeals the district court’s dismissal of 

his action as barred by the applicable six-month statute of 

limitations set forth in 29 U.S.C. § 160(b) (2012). On appeal, 

we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s 

brief. See Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(8); Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 

178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999) (stating that failure to 

raise claim and support argument in opening brief “triggers 

abandonment of that claim on appeal”). 

Because Washington’s brief does not challenge the basis for 

the district court’s disposition of his federal claims, he has 

forfeited appellate review of the district court’s order. As to 

Washington’s argument for the exercise of supplemental 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (2012), we reject this argument 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. Giant 

of Md., LLC, No. 8-13-cv-02599-PWG (D. Md. Feb. 6, 2015).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
-. .- 

The Honorable A. Bryan S.pires, Jr.M. D. Opinion No. H- 359 

Secretary 

Texas State Board of Medical Examiners Re: May the Texas State 

Southwest Tower Bldg. Suite 900 Board of Medical Examiners 

211 East Seventh Street have facsimile signatures of 

Austin, Texas 78701 its members affixed by a 

mechanical proces,s to the 

license certificates it issues. 

Dear Dr. Spires: 

You ask whether members of the Texas State Board of Medical 

Examiners may satisfy the requirements of Art. 4503, V. T. C. S., by 

having facsimiles of their penned signatures made and affixed by 

mechanical process to license certificates rather than signing each 

certificate individually by hand. Art. 4503 provides that: 

All certificates shall be attested by the seal 

of the Board and signed by all members of the 

Board, or a quorum thereof. 

It is out opinion that a Board member’s use of a facsimile of a 

penned signature is in compliance with the statutory requirement. In 

Mondragon v. Mondragon, 257 S. W. 215, 216 (Tex. 1923), the Texas 

Supreme Court stated: 

A s.ignature made by rubber stamp, typewriter or 

printing . . , may be adopted, and the instrument 

to whi.ch it is signed becomes binding. 

p. 1689 
. 

The Honorable Bryan Spires, Jr. page 2 (H-359) 

In Parsons v. State, 429 S. W, 2d 476, 477 (Tex. Crim. 1968), 

the Court of Criminal Appeals concurred: 

The use of a stamp producing a facsimile 

of an original signature in signing le.gal documents has been upheld by this court. 

According to BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY: 

A “signature” may be written by hand, printed, 

stamped, typewritten, engraved, photographed, 

or cut from one instrument and attached to 

another, and a signature lithographed on an 

instrument by a party is sufficient for the 

purpose of signing it; it being immaterial 

with what kind of instrument a signature is 

made, (Signature, p. 1553). 

Clearly, a stamped facsimile of a penned signature is a signature 

and satisfies the requirements of Art. 4503. 

SUMMARY 

A Board member’s use of a facsimile of his 

penned signature affixed to a license certificate 

by printing, engraving, or other mechanical 

process will satisfy the intent and letter of Art. 

4503, V. T. C. S. 

Very truly yours, 

Attorney General of Texas 

p. 1690 
. 

. 

The Honorable Bryan Spires page 3 (H-359) 

DAVID M. KENDALL, Chair’man 

Opinion Committee 

lg 

pe 1691
**IMMUCELL CORPORATION**

**EXHIBIT 32**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of ImmuCell Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael F. Brigham, President, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe Company. 

/s/ Michael F. Brigham 

Michael F.Brigham 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer 

March 24, 2008 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ImmuCell Corporation and willbe retained by ImmuCell Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 89 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 89

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
 States should grant asylum to Aasiya Noreen, internationally known as 
  Asia Bibi, and her immediate family, due to the persecution she has 
                   faced on account of her religion.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2019

 Mr. Calvert submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
 States should grant asylum to Aasiya Noreen, internationally known as 
  Asia Bibi, and her immediate family, due to the persecution she has 
                   faced on account of her religion.

Whereas the United States is a Nation founded on the principles of freedom of 
        religion and freedom of speech;
Whereas the right to due process is enshrined in the United States Constitution;
Whereas Asia Bibi and her family are practicing Pakistani Catholics, a minority 
        group in Pakistan;
Whereas, in June 2009, Asia Bibi was accused of insulting the Muslim faith in a 
        confrontation with a neighbor and drinking from a water source reserved 
        solely for Muslim use;
Whereas, in November 2010, Asia Bibi, was sentenced to death by hanging after 
        being convicted of blasphemy by a Pakistani District Court under Article 
        295-C of Pakistan's penal code;
Whereas Asia Bibi appealed her sentence, but it was upheld in October 2014 by 
        the Lahore High Court of Appeals;
Whereas, in October 2018, the Supreme Court of Pakistan rightfully acquitted 
        Asia Bibi due to insufficient evidence;
Whereas Asia Bibi and her family have been forced into hiding for fear of 
        extrajudicial murder;
Whereas in Pakistan, being accused of blasphemy by either the government or a 
        private individual, can lead to violence against the accused;
Whereas human rights violations in Pakistan include inconsistent due process, 
        poor prison conditions, lengthy and arbitrary sentences, and lack of 
        judicial independence; and
Whereas the United States may grant asylum to people who have been persecuted by 
        their government on account of race, religion, nationality, membership 
        in a social group, or political belief: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the importance of granting asylum to those 
        with legitimate claims of persecution for their religion, race, 
        nationality, membership in a social group, or political belief; 
        and
            (2) supports granting asylum in the United States to Aasiya 
        Noreen and her immediate family.
                                 <all>
```
The State of

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 10, 2015

No. 04-15-00413-CR

Elias JUAREZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR2864

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On July 7, 2015, appellant filed a notice of appeal in the trial court and a motion for 

extension of time to file a notice of appeal in this Court. Appellant’s motion for extension of time 

to file a notice of appeal complies with Rule 26.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and, 

therefore, is GRANTED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. The time to file appellant’s notice of appeal is 

extended to July 7, 2015. 

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# table68_q9.2_state
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 126 (Thursday, July 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31772-31773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15635]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Meeting of the Plant 
Operations and Fire Protection Subcommittee; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Plant Operations & Fire Protection will 
hold a meeting on July 30, 2009, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
Region II, Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 23 T85, 61 Forsyth Street, 
SW., Atlanta, GA 30303-8931.
    This meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

July 30, 2009--8 a.m.-3 p.m.

    The Subcommittee will meet with the Administrator and Region II 
staff on items of mutual interest. The Subcommittee will gather 
information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed 
positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the Full 
Committee at a later date.
    Members of the public desiring to observe the meeting, provide oral 
statements and/or written comments

[[Page 31773]]

should notify the Designated Federal Official, Ms. Maitri Banerjee 
(telephone 301-415-6973) at five days prior to the meeting, if 
possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Members of the 
public will be required to present a valid form of identification and 
go through security screening at the entrance of the building. 
Electronic recordings will be permitted. Detailed procedures for the 
conduct of and participation in ACRS meetings were published in the 
Federal Register on October 6, 2008, (73FR 58268-58269).
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting the Designated Federal Official between 7 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. 
(ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the 
above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting 
to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

    Dated: June 23, 2009.
Cayetano Santos,
Chief, Reactor Safety Branch A, Advisory Committee on Reactor 
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E9-15635 Filed 7-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
H. Res. 497 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 17, 2019. 

Resolved, That William P. Barr, Attorney General of the 

United States, and Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary of Commerce, shall be found to be in contempt of Congress for failing to comply with subpoenas authorized by the Committee 

on Oversight and Reform and duly issued by Chairman Elijah E. Cummings relating to the 2020 Census. 

Resolved, That the Attorney General (i) failed to comply 

with a Committee subpoena issued on April 2, 2019, to 

produce documents, and (ii) ordered a Department of Justice 

employee, John Gore, not to comply with a Committee subpoena requiring him to appear for deposition testimony before 

the Committee on April 11, 2019. 

Resolved, That the Secretary of Commerce failed to comply with a Committee subpoena issued on April 2, 2019, to 

produce documents. 

Resolved, That the Report of the Committee on Oversight and Reform details the refusal of the Attorney General 

to produce documents to the Committee as required by sub-
2 

•HRES 497 EH 

poena, the order from the Attorney General directing John 

Gore to defy a duly authorized Committee subpoena for deposition testimony, and the refusal of the Secretary of Commerce to produce documents to the Committee as required by 

subpoena. 

Resolved, That pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 192 and 194, the 

Speaker of the House of Representatives shall certify the Report of the Committee on Oversight and Reform, detailing 

the refusal of William P. Barr, Attorney General of the 

United States, to produce documents to the Committee on 

Oversight and Reform as directed by subpoena, to the United 

States Attorney for the District of Columbia, to the end that 

Mr. Barr be proceeded against in the manner and form provided by law. 

Resolved, That pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 192 and 194, the 

Speaker of the House of Representatives shall certify the Report of the Committee on Oversight and Reform, detailing 

the refusal of Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary of Commerce, 

to produce documents to the Committee as directed by subpoena, to the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, to the end that Mr. Ross be proceeded against in the 

manner and form provided by law. 

Resolved, That the Speaker of the House shall otherwise 

take all appropriate action to enforce the subpoenas. 
3 

•HRES 497 EH 

Resolved, That the Chairman of the Committee on Oversight and Reform shall take all necessary steps to enforce the 

above-referenced subpoenas, including, but not limited to, 

seeking authorization from the House of Representatives 

through a vote of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group pursuant to clause 8(b) of rule II, and H. Res. 430, to initiate 

or to intervene in proceedings in any federal court of competent jurisdiction, to seek judgements affirming the duty of 

the subpoena recipients to comply with the above-referenced 

subpoenas, and to seek any appropriate ancillary relief, including injunctive relief. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge 

John Francis Arpino 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
quarterly report of VelaTel Global Communications, Inc. ("Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013
as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the date hereof (“this Report"),
I Carlos Trujillo, Chief, Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(i) this Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) the information contained
in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated: August 19, 2013 | By: /s/ Carlos Trujillo                 
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------------
|                       | Carlos Trujillo, Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
# table130_q14.5_naics
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Globalink, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Robin Young
                                 ----------------------
                                 Robin Young
                                 Chief Executive Officer

May 16, 2011

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Globalink, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Ben Choi
                                 ----------------------
                                 Ben Choi
                                 Chief Executive Officer

May 16, 2011
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification of Periodic Financial Report**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

Forpurposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Dannette Boyd, the ChiefFinancial Officer of Integrated Management Information, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

 

(i)    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(ii)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

 
| Date:  November 14, 2008           |
|-----------------------------------------|
|                                    |
| /s/  Dannette Boyd                      |   |
| Dannette  Boyd, Chief Financial Officer |

 

----