alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appeal Ordered Withdrawn and Opinion issued November 3, 1999

In The 

## C!tnurt nf

## l\ppenln 111tft}J 

## llintrirt nf 

## we*nn nt llnllnn No. 05-99-01572-CR

MICHAEL GLENN COPLEY,Appellant 

## v. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Criminal CourtNo. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court CauseNo. MB98-3375-F



### OPINION PER CURIAM Before ChiefJustice Thomas and Justices Kinkeade and O'Neill Appellant has filed a motion to withdrawthe appeal. Appellant's counsel has approved the motion. This Court hereby GRANTS the motion and ORDERS the appeal withdrawn and that this decision be certifiedbelowfor observance. See TEX. R. 

### APP. P. 42.2(a).

DoNotPublish TEX. R. 

### APP. P. 47 PERCURIAMFifth Court ofAppeals Case Attorney Address List Page: Date Printed: 11/03/1999 Case Number: 05-99-01572-CR Date Filed: 09/20/1999 Style: Copley, Michael Glenn v. The State ofTexas Trial Judge: Fuller, Tom Trial Court Reporter: West, Donna Trial Court: COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO 5 Trial County: APP Bill Booth ATT 002648000 Abrams Centre BankBuilding 9330 LBJ FWY. SUITE 900 Dallas, TX 75243 Phone 214/520-8982 Fax STA Kerry Fitzgerald ATT 007088000 Assistant District Attorney 133 N. Industrial, LB 19 Dallas, TX 75207 Phone 214/653-3600 Fax I - DALLAS
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   12-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1996
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1996
[CASH]                                        $968,638
[SECURITIES]                                        $0
[RECEIVABLES]                              $20,676,877
[ALLOWANCES]                                ($616,708)
[INVENTORY]                                         $0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                           $41,846,422
[PP&E]                                     $59,269,412
[DEPRECIATION]                           ($22,256,418)
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                             $93,082,907
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                      $36,268,929
[BONDS]                                             $0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                               $0
[PREFERRED]                                         $0
[COMMON]                                        $4,447
[OTHER-SE]                                 $17,848,849
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]               $93,082,907
[SALES]                                   $113,240,908
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                          $113,240,908
[CGS]                                     $106,226,145
[TOTAL-COSTS]                             $106,226,145
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                           $14,683,191
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                    $0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                          $3,107,000
[INCOME-PRETAX]                          ($10,775,428)
[INCOME-TAX]                              ($2,091,989)
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                       $(8,683,439)
[DISCONTINUED]                                      $0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                     $0
[CHANGES]                                           $0
[NET-INCOME]                              ($8,683,439)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                  ($1.96)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                  ($1.96)
</TABLE>
October 20, 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WHITTEN ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A ALLYN MEDICAL SERVICES, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00621-CV V.

JOYCE DOTY, Appellee

____________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment 

signed by the court below on May 17, 2011. Having considered the motion and found it 

meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

WHITTEN ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A ALLYN MEDICAL SERVICES.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 17, 2015

NO. 03-13-00765-CV

In re I. G.

APPEAL FROM 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on November 4, 2013. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. Because appellant 

is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 639 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 639

 Requiring that all Members have non-participatory access to committee 
   proceedings related to matters referred to by the Speaker in her 
                  announcement of September 24, 2019.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 18, 2019

    Mr. Scalise (for himself and Mr. Cole) submitted the following 
        resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Requiring that all Members have non-participatory access to committee 
   proceedings related to matters referred to by the Speaker in her 
                  announcement of September 24, 2019.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This resolution may be cited as the ``Open and Transparent 
Impeachment Investigation Resolution''.

SEC. 2. ACCESS TO COMMITTEE PROCEEDINGS.

    A Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner shall not be excluded 
from non-participatory attendance at committee proceedings related to 
matters referred to by the Speaker in her announcement of September 24, 
2019, including transcribed interviews and depositions, notwithstanding 
regulations issued by the chair of the Committee on Rules pursuant to 
section 103(a)(2) of H. Res. 6, at the following committees:
            (1) Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
            (2) Committee on Oversight and Reform.
            (3) Committee on Foreign Affairs.
            (4) Committee on Financial Services.
            (5) Committee on Ways and Means.
            (6) Committee on the Judiciary.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.15

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                              COUNTRYWIDE CAPITAL V

         This Certificate of Trust of Countrywide Capital V dated November 20,
2001, is hereby duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustees of
Countrywide Capital V, for the purpose of forming a business trust under the
Delaware Business Trust Act, 12 Del. C. Section 3801 et seq. The undersigned, as
trustees, do hereby certify as follows:

         1.       Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby (the
"Trust") is "Countrywide Capital V."

         2.       Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee
of the Trust which has its principal place of business in the State of Delaware,
as required by 12 Del. C. Sec. 3807(a), is The Bank of New York (Delaware),
White Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware 19711.

         3.       Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
as of the date of its filing.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the sole trustees of the
Trust at the time of filing of this Certificate of Trust, have executed this
Certificate of Trust as of the date first above written.

                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Sandor E. Samuels
                                    Title: Regular Trustee


                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Thomas K. McLaughlin
                                    Title: Regular Trustee


                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Jennifer Sandefur
                                    Title: Regular Trustee


                                    The Bank of New York (Delaware), as Delaware
                                    Trustee

                                    By:
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name:
                                    Title:

                                       2
<PAGE>

                                  By:_______________________________
                                  Name:
                                  Title:








                                       2
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 21-1568

THOMAS SWARTZ,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

NORMAN SYLVESTER; TOWN OF BOURNE,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on November 21, 2022, 

is amended as follows:

On page 14, line 14, replace "See Lukumi, 508 U.S. at 

543." with "See id. at 543."
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30615-30616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15174]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5336-N-02]


Meeting of the Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing 
Commissioner, HUD.

ACTION: Notice of upcoming meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of an 
upcoming meeting of the Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee (the 
Committee). The meeting is open to the public and the site is 
accessible to individuals with disabilities.

[[Page 30616]]


DATES: Meetings will be held on Tuesday, July 28, 2009, 8 a.m. to 5 
p.m., Wednesday, July 29, 2009, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Thursday, July 
30, 2008, 8 a.m. to 11 a.m. eastern standard time.

ADDRESSES: These meetings will be held at the Holiday Inn Arlington at 
Ballston, 4610 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22203, 
telephone (703) 243-9800.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William W. Matchneer III, Associate 
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regulatory Affairs and Manufactured 
Housing, Office of Manufactured Housing Programs, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410, 
telephone (202) 708-6409 (this is not a toll-free number). Persons who 
have difficulty hearing or speaking may access this number via TTY by 
calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at (800) 877-
8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is provided in 
accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(5 U.S.C. App. 2) and 41 CFR 102-3.150. The Manufactured Housing 
Consensus Committee was established under section 604(a)(3) of the 
National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 
1974, as amended by the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000, 
42 U.S.C. 5403(a)(3). The Consensus Committee is charged with providing 
recommendations to the Secretary to adopt, revise, and interpret 
manufactured housing construction and safety standards, procedural and 
enforcement regulations, installation standards, installation 
regulations, and dispute resolution regulations.

Tentative Agenda

    A. Welcome and Introductions.
    B. Full Committee Meeting.
    C. MHCC Charter and Bylaws.
    D. Primary Inspection Agency Proposed Rule.
    E. Reference Standards--3rd Set of Standards Updates.
    F. Public Testimony.
    G. Reports and Actions on Committee Work.
    H. Adjourn.

    Dated: June 18, 2009.
Brian D. Montgomery,
Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. E9-15174 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
Exhibit 16.1




March 22, 2010




Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, N.E.


Washington, DC 20549




Re: Alamo Energy Corp.




Commissioners:




We have read the statements made by Alamo Energy Corp., which we understand will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Item 5, as part of the Form 10-Q of Alamo Energy Corp. dated March 22, 2010. We agree with the statements concerning our Firm in such Form 10-Q. We have no basis to agree or disagree with any other statements made under Item 5.




Sincerely,




Quintanilla Accountancy Corporation




/s/ Quintanilla





Laguna Niguel, California
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

                     SECOND AMENDMENT TO LAND SALES CONTRACT
                    BETWEEN BIGHAM FARMS INC. AND SOLOMAN LAM


     THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO LAND SALES CONTRACT (the "Second Amendment"), is
dated as of this 18th day of October, 2001, by and between Bigham Farms Inc.
("Bigham") and Soloman Lam ("Lam").

     WHEREAS, in November 2000, Bigham and Lam entered into a Land Sales
Contract (the "Contract") which gave Lam the option (the "Option") to purchase
approximately 2,300 acres (the "Property") located in Adamsville, Florida from
Bigham for a purchase price of $8,050,000;

     WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 4 of the Contract, if Lam chose to exercise
the Option, the closing date would have to occur prior to September 1, 2001;

     WHEREAS, on August 22, 2001, Bigham and Lam entered into an Addendum to the
Contract (the "First Addendum") to extend the closing date for the exercise of
the Option under the Contract to March 1, 2002, but which referenced the date of
the Contract as August 22, 2001, rather than November 2000; and

     WHEREAS, Bigham and Lam now wish to clarify the First Addendum and formally
amend Article 4 of the Contract;

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained,
Bigham and Lam hereby agree as follows:

1.   The Contract shall be amended by modifying Article 4 so that, as amended,
it shall read as follows:

     4. CLOSING DATE; OCCUPANCY: This Contract will be closed and the deed and
     possession delivered on or before March 1, 2002, unless extended by other
     provisions of this Contract. If on Closing Date insurance underwriting is
     suspended, BUYER may postpone closing up to 5 days.

2.   Unless otherwise specifically amended herein, all other terms of the
Contract shall remain in full force and effect.


                         [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed and delivered
this Second Amendment as of the day and year first above written.




                                     BIGHAM FARMS INC.



                                     By: /s/ William J. Bigham
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         William J. Bigham



                                         /s/ Soloman Lam
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Soloman Lam
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD 

SIGNATURE OF RAILROAD OFFICIAL 

DATE SIGNED 

IF RAILROAD IS REPRESENTED: 

Name of 

Representative: _________________________________________ 

Address: ______________________________________________ 

______________________________________________________ 

Telephone No.: 

Attorney Non-Attorney 

BASE-YEAR EMPLOYER APPEAL 

UNDER THE 

RAILROAD UNEMPLOYMENT 

INSURANCE ACT 

IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ 

PROGRAM LETTER 2005-01 

BEFORE COMPLETING THIS FORM 

PRINT NAME OF BASE-YEAR EMPLOYER 

INFORMATION ABOUT RAILROAD EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT 

TELEPHONE NUMBER 

( 

TELEPHONE NUMBER 

( 

PRINT NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE RAILROAD OFFICIAL FILING THIS 

APPEAL 

PRINT ADDRESS (Number, Street/Apt. No., P.O. Box) 

PRINT NAME (First, Middle Initial, Last)) 

CITY STATE ZIP CODE 

SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER 

COMPLETE EITHER ITEM A OR B BELOW: 

A. I hereby appeal the reconsideration decision reported in a letter dated ______________________ 

B. I hereby appeal the hearings officer’s decision reported in a letter dated _____________________ 

R

This appeal is based on what I believe to be mistakes of fact or errors of law. Details of these mistakes are as follows: 

(Attach Additional Sheets If Necessary) 

(Please see 20 CFR 320.40(a) of the Railroad Retirement Board’s Regulations) 

I INTEND TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE AS FOLLOWS: (if none, so state) 

THIS FORM SHOULD BE SENT TO THE BUREAU OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS, RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, 844 NORTH 

RUSH STREET, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60611-2092, OR TO ANY OFFICE OF THE RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD. SEE PROGRAM 

LETTER 2005-01 FOR INFORMATION ON TIME LIMITATIONS. 

( ) ________________________________ 

) 

) 

R

FORM HA-1 EMP (11-04) OMB APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED, LESS THAN 10 RESPONSES ANNUALLY
30532 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 122 / Friday, June 26, 2009 / Notices 

U.S. Army Reserve Center: 950 New 

Castle Road, Farrell, PA. 

NPA: Unknown (No Performing Agency). 

Contracting Activity: Dept of the Army, XR 

W40M NATL Region Contract OFC. 

Barry S. Lineback, 

Director, Business Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–15162 Filed 6–25–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6353–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 09–23] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 09–23 

with attached transmittal, and policy 

justification. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 122 / Friday, June 26, 2009 / Notices 30533 


EN26JN09.214</GPH>
30534 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 122 / Friday, June 26, 2009 / Notices 


EN26JN09.215</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 122 / Friday, June 26, 2009 / Notices 30535 

Dated: May 29, 2009. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. E9–15111 Filed 6–25–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 09–22] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 09–22 

with attached transmittal, policy 

justification, and Sensitivity of 

Technology. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


EN26JN09.216</GPH>
#### In the Matter of Jennifer R., Respondent, v Michael C., Appellant.

[854 NYS2d 378]

While respondent correctly points out that the irrebuttable mandatory minimum child support award of $25 per month set forth in Family Court Act § 413 (1) (g) is preempted under the Supremacy Clause (42 USC § 667 [b] [2]; *Matter of Rose v Moody,*83 NY2d 65, 71-72 [1993], *cert denied sub nom. Attorney General of N.Y. v Moody,*511 US 1084 [1994]; *Matter of Lanzi v Lanzi,*298 AD2d 53, 56 [2002]), a review of the Family Court order at issue reveals that the $25 award was made pursuant to Family Court Act § 413 (1) (a), which provides, in relevant part, that “the parents of a child under the age of twenty-one years are chargeable with the support of such child and, *if possessed of sufficient means or able to earn such means,*shall be required to pay for child support a fair and reasonable sum as the court may determine” (emphasis added). Accordingly, we find that the child support award herein does not run afoul of the Supremacy Clause and, after a review of the record, further find that the Family Court did not err in ordering respondent to pay child *444support in the amount of $25 per month *(see Aregano v Aregano,*289 AD2d 1081 [2001]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Nardelli and McGuire, JJ.
No. 12-15-00080-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TWELFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

OF TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF EDSEL AMOS DIXON AND HEATHER

D. DIXON AND IN THE INTEREST OF ASHLEY LYNN DIXON, A CHILD

On Appeal from the

354th Judicial District Court

ofRains County, Texas

In Cause No. 9544

FiLCD IN COURT OF APPEALS

12th Court of Appeals District

CATHY S.LUSK,

REQUEST TO POSTPONE ALL APPEAL DEADLINES

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

NOW COMES EDSEL AMOS DIXON, Appellant herein, and files this Request to

postpone all appeal deadlines and would show the Court as follows:

1. On May 8th, 2015 Appellant received the attached Exhibit "A" from the Rains County

District Clerk in regards to Cause No. 9544. The Notice OfJury Docket Setting sets

the above referenced case on the Court's jury trial docket for January 19th, 2016 at

9:00am.

The setting ofthe above referenced case for Jury trial is a clear indication that the final

judgement signed on January 23, 2015 was in fact not final. All issues and claims

have not been decided, therefore said judgement signed on January 23, 2015 was not a

final judgement or order.
3. Appellant would respectfully request pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 27.1.(a) and 27.2.

that this court accept this appeal as being prematurely filed and that all deadlines for

this appeal be continued until further judgement of all issues is decided after the Jury

Trial set for January 19th, 2016.

4. This Request is not made for delay, but rather so that Appellant may have the

opportunity to appeal all orders or judgements decided in this cause number if

necessary.

Wherefore premises considered, Appellant requests that this Court grant this request and

postpone all deadlines to perfect this appeal, pending Jury Trial set for January 19th, 2016.

Respectfully Submitted,

/

Edsel Amos Dixon

Pro Se Litigant

732 Weddle Dr.

Grapevine, TX 76051

682-301-0592

eddixon903@gmail.com

,^<—
H. CRAIG BLACK

ATTORNEY AT LAW

2510 LEE STREET

GREENVILLE. TX 75401

EDSEL A. DIXON

732 WEDDLE DRIVE

GRAPEVINE, 7X76051

DISTRICT CLERK

RAINS COUNTY

Office: 903/473-5000 Ext. 101 • Facsimile: 903/473-5008

May 8, 2015

NOTICE OF JURY DOCKET SETTING

CAUSE #9544

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF DIXON

''A "\

Dear Gentlemen:

Pursuant toEDSEL DIXON's request and payment ofS30.00, the above-referenced case has been set on the Court's Jury Trial Docket

for TUESDAY, JANUARY 19, 2016 at 9:00am.

The available pretrial dates, ifrequested, include the 2nd and 4,h Fridays of each month, provided the hearing can take place in one

hour or less.

Please be advised, the Honorable Judge RICHARD BEACOM only has jurytrials twice a year.

Please contactour officeto coordinate any settings.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call meat (903)473-5000, ext 102.

/lp

i \Sincerely, / \

<nLAURA PATE

DEPUTY

220 WEST QUITMAN STREET • P.O. BOX 187 • EMORY, TEXAS 75440
97-381.

#### Toledo Edison Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.

Public Utilities Commission, No. 95-910-EL-AEC. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal and the joint motion for temporary stay of proceedings,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion for temporary stay of proceedings be, and hereby is, moot.