alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,776]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 8, 2009 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Mercedes-Benz United States International, Inc., Vance, Alabama. The workers at the subject facility produce GL class, M class and R class vehicles.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 18th day of May 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-15294 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### James Timmons et al., Respondents, v Lynx Contracting Corporation et al., Defendants, The Sisters of Charity of Saint Vincent De Paul of New York et al., Respondents, and HMS Mechanical Systems Inc., Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 774]

Plaintiff was injured when he fell through a glass skylight while in the course of performing air conditioning insulation work on the fifth floor of the subject building. HMS was hired to install the air conditioning units in the building and although HMS subcontracted the duct work to plaintiffs employer, there are no triable issues as to whether it was a contractor under Labor Law § 240 (1), with the nondelegable liability for injuries arising within the scope of the contracted work, including those suffered by plaintiff *(see Russin v Louis N. Picciano & Son,*54 NY2d 311, 317-318 [1981]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Gonzalez, Buckley and Acosta, JJ. *[See*14 Misc 3d 317.]
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00187-CR

Belinda Barrow

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 297th District Court

of Tarrant County (1314019R)

July 16, 2015

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment is modified to delete 

the deadly weapon finding. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is 

affirmed as modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bill Meier 

 Justice Bill Meier
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20483 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DOCTORY HAMPTON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-96-CR-193-2

- - - - - - - - - - April 01, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Doctory Hampton appeals his sentence following his conviction for armed bank robbery, conspiracy to use and carry a firearm during a crime of violence, and using and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence. Hampton argues that the district court erred in enhancing his base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3A1.2(b) because that guideline protects law enforcement and corrections officers and does not apply to victims who are private security guards.No. 97-20483 -2- In the alternative to enhancing Hampton’s base offense level under § 3A1.2(b), the district court upwardly departed based on an aggravating circumstance not considered by the guidelines.
See U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0, p.s.; 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b). Because Hampton has not argued on appeal that this upward departure was erroneous, this issue has been abandoned. See United States v. Rivas , 99 F.3d 170, 176 (5th Cir. 1996). We decline to make a determination whether the district court erred in applying § 3A1.2(b) and affirm the district court’s upward departure. Hampton also contends, for the first time on appeal, that U.S.S.G. § 1B1.1, comment. (n.1(j)), which defines “serious bodily injury” is unconstitutionally vague and that his sentence should not have been increased four levels under § 2B3.1(b)(3)(B) on the ground that the victim suffered a serious bodily injury. In light of the facts that the victim suffered great pain; the wound was in a “critical area” and could very easily have killed the victim; the victim was hospitalized for 22 hours; and the victim was unable to work for about six weeks, Hampton has not demonstrated plain error with respect to his contention that the definition of serious bodily injury is unconstitutionally vague as applied to him.
AFFIRMED.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1280** 

XIANG YANG , Petitioner ,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of An Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : September 16, 2015 Decided: September 30, 2015

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Farah Loftus, LAW OFFICE OF FARAH LOFTUS, Los Angeles, California, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Jesse M. Bless, Senior Litigation Counsel, Neelam Ihsanullah, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Xiang Yang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic

of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing her appeal of the Immigration Ju dge’s denial of Yang’s requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Yang’s merits hearing, her asylum application, and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative findings of fact, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s

decision. See INS v. Elias

- Zacarias , 5 02 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Yang (B.I.A. Feb. 27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mat erials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6303

HERSCHEL JULIUS PERKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CARLTON DEWBERRY, Sergeant; MICHAEL NEEBE,

Deputy; TIMOTHY HONIG, Deputy; ALEXANDRIA

SHERIFF'S OFFICE; JAMES H. DUNNING, Sheriff's

Office of Alexandria,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CA-03-1335-1)

Submitted: July 6, 2005 Decided: July 28, 2005

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herschel Julius Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. Jack L. Gould, Fairfax,

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Herschel Julius Perkins appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error because, even

accepting Perkins’ version of the disputed events, his injuries

were de minimis. While the district court did not address Perkins’

mental anguish claim, this claim is meritless because de minimis

physical injuries cannot support a claim for mental or emotional

injury. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
****EXHIBIT 32.2****

 

****Certificationof Periodic Financial Report****

****Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350****

 

Forpurposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Dannette Boyd, the ChiefFinancial Officer of Integrated Management Information, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

 

(i)           the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)        the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:August 4, 2009

 
| /s/  Dannette Boyd                      |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Dannette  Boyd, Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

1

----
**IMMUCELL CORPORATION**

**EXHIBIT 31**

**RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Michael F. Brigham, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ImmuCell Corporation (the Company); 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theCompany as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.    I am responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to me by others,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos.33-8238 and 33-8392]; 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theCompany’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financialreporting; and 

5.    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:        March 29, 2010 

/s/ Michael F. Brigham

Michael F. Brigham 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 123 (Monday, June 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15327]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Paducah

AGENCY: Department of Energy (DOE).

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Paducah. The Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that 
public notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, July 16, 2009, 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Barkley Centre, 111 Memorial Drive, Paducah, Kentucky 42001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reinhard Knerr, Deputy Designated 
Federal Officer, Department of Energy Paducah Site Office, Post Office 
Box 1410, MS-103, Paducah, Kentucky 42001, (270) 441-6825.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE in the areas of environmental restoration, waste 
management and related activities.

Tentative Agenda

    <bullet> Call to Order, Introductions, Review of Agenda;
    <bullet> Deputy Designated Federal Officer's Comments;
    <bullet> Federal Coordinator's Comments;
    <bullet> Liaisons' Comments;
    <bullet> Committee Chairs' Comments;
    <bullet> Presentations;
    <bullet> Administrative Issues:
     [cir] Motions;
    <bullet> Public Comments;
    <bullet> Final Comments;
    <bullet> Adjourn;
    Breaks Taken As Appropriate.
    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Paducah, welcomes the attendance 
of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will make every 
effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or special 
needs. If you require special accommodations due to a disability, 
please contact Reinhard Knerr at least seven days in advance of the 
meeting at the telephone number listed above. Written statements may be 
filed with the Board either before or after the meeting. Individuals 
who wish to make oral statements pertaining to agenda items should 
contact Reinhard Knerr at the address or telephone number listed above. 
Requests must be received five days prior to the meeting and reasonable 
provision will be made to include the presentation in the agenda. The 
Deputy Designated Federal Officer is empowered to conduct the meeting 
in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business. 
Individuals wishing to make public comment will be provided a maximum 
of five minutes to present their comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing or calling Reinhard 
Knerr at the address and phone number listed above. Minutes will also 
be available at the following Web site: http://www.pgdpcab.org/meetings.html.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on June 22, 2009.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-15327 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
#### Janice Hammett, Appellant, v Fausto C. Diaz-Frias et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[852 NYS2d 128]

The experts for both sides referred in their affirmations to plaintiff’s MRI reports that were before the court *(see Thompson v Abbasi,*15 AD3d 95 [2005]; *Brown v*Achy, 9 AD3d 30 [2004]; *Gonzalez v Vasquez,*301 AD2d 438 [2003]), which established the existence of disc bulges and herniations *(Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]).

The affirmed report of Dr. Howell, who first examined plaintiff four days after the incident, connected plaintiff’s injuries to the incident and raised a triable issue of fact as to whether they constituted a “serious injury” as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d). While Howell did not provide qualitative limitations in his report or specify the tests he conducted *(see Burke v Torres,*8 AD3d 118 [2004]), his reference to an unsworn report of Dr. Sloan, which did provide such data, should have been considered by the motion court, since “evidence, otherwise excludable at trial, may be considered to deny a motion for summary judgment provided that this evidence does not form the sole basis for the court’s determination” *(Largotta v Recife Realty Co.,*254 AD2d 225, 225 [1998], quoting *Wertheimer v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn.,*85 AD2d 540, 541 [1981]).

Even though he did not examine plaintiff until 10 months after the incident, plaintiff’s doctor was able to report that plaintiff’s symptoms were caused by the June 2004 accident, that her condition was permanent in nature, in part an “exacerbation of underlying degenerative joint disease and prior injuries,” and that she sustained permanent consequential limitation in her cervical and lumbosacral spine. This was sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to the permanence of the injury. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15460]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5300-N-07]


Notice of Availability: Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for 
Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Healthy Homes Technical Studies

AGENCY: Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Through this notice, HUD announces the availability on its Web 
site of the application information, submission deadlines, funding 
criteria, and other requirements for the FY2009 Healthy Homes Technical 
Studies NOFA. The Healthy Homes Technical Studies NOFA makes $4 million 
available under the Department of Housing and Urban Development 
Appropriations Act 2009 (Pub. L. 111-8, approved March 11, 2009). 
Applicants for assistance under the Healthy Homes Technical Studies 
NOFA must address applicable requirements found in the Notice of HUD's 
Fiscal Year 2009 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) Policy 
Requirements and General Section to the HUD's FY2009 NOFAs for 
Discretionary Programs published on December 29, 2008 (73 FR 79548), as 
amended on April 16, 2009 (74 FR 17685). Applicants should take 
particular note that they should follow the application submission 
instructions contained in this NOFA and not use those in the General 
Section. The notice providing information regarding the application 
process, funding criteria and eligibility requirements is available on 
the HUD Web site at http://www.hud.gov/lead.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning the Healthy 
Homes Technical Studies Program, contact Dr. Peter Ashley, Office of 
Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control, Department of Housing and Urban 
Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 8236, Washington, DC 20410-
3000; telephone 202-402-7595 (this is not a toll-free number) or via e-
mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#29794c5d4c5b076307685a41454c5069415c4d074e465f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a2f2c7d6c7d08ce88ce3d1cacec7dbe2cad7c68cc5cdd4">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons with speech or hearing 
impairments may access this telephone number via TTY by calling the 
toll-free Federal Information Relay Service during working hours at 
800-877-8339.

    Dated: June 18, 2009.
Jon L. Gant,
 Director, Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control.
[FR Doc. E9-15460 Filed 6-25-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
@conference{1215306,
  author = {William Borders and Nitin Prasad and Brian Hoskins and Advait Madhavan and Matthew Daniels and Vasileia Gerogiou and Tiffany Santos and Patrick Braganca and Mark Stiles and Jabez J. McClelland},
  title = {Magnetic tunnel junction-based crossbars: improving neural network performance by reducing the impact of non-idealities},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-07-13 04:07:00},
  publisher = {Magnetic tunnel junction-based crossbars: improving neural network performance by reducing the impact of non-idealities, Sendai, JP},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936143},
  language = {en},
}
The State of llee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 21, 2015

No. 04-15-00208-CR

Jessica G. CASTILLO,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 4, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 458109

Honorable Jason Garrahan, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In these companion cases, Appellant’s briefs were due on June 17, 2015. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.6(a). We granted Appellant’s first motions for extensions of time to file the briefs 

until July 17, 2015. On July 20, 2015, Appellant filed second motions for extension of time to 

file the briefs until August 17, 2015, for a total extension of sixty days. 

Appellant’s motions are GRANTED. Appellant must file the briefs not later than August 

17, 2015. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEFS 

WILL BE GRANTED. 

If Appellant fails to file the briefs as ordered, we may abate these appeals and remand 

them to the trial court for abandonment hearings. See id. R. 38.8(b); Samaniego v. State, 952 

S.W.2d 50, 52–53 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court