alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31

IMMUCELL CORPORATION

RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael F. Brigham, certify that:

1. I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ImmuCell Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I
am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 33-8392];

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit
committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



/s/    MICHAEL F.
BRIGHAMMichael F. BrighamPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer


Date: March 23, 2006
NO. 07-06-0405-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

OCTOBER 23, 2006

______________________________

ROSETTA MATTHEWS, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 52,396-E; HONORABLE ABE LOPEZ, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Rosetta Matthews, appeals from her conviction for possession of a

controlled substance in a drug free zone. Sentence was imposed on July 13, 2006.

Certified copies of the Judgment have been delivered to this Court from the trial court

clerk’s office. We will dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Our appellate jurisdiction over a criminal appeal is triggered through a timely notice

of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). In the absence of

a notice of appeal timely filed in compliance with the requirements of Rule of Appellate
2

Procedure 26, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the

appeal in a criminal case, and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Slaton

v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998). As applicable here, Rule of

Appellate Procedure 26.2(a) requires a notice of appeal in a criminal case be filed within

30 days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or within 90 days

after imposition of the sentence if a timely motion for new trial is filed. Rule 26.3 allows for

an extension of time if the appellant files a notice of appeal with the trial court within 15

days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal and files a motion for extension with

the appellate court. 

Here, the record reflects that the court imposed sentence on appellant on July 13,

2006. No motion for new trial was filed, thus making the notice of appeal due on August

14, 2006. The notice of appeal was filed October 6, 2006. Appellant’s failure to file a

timely notice of appeal or to meet the requirements for an extension under Rule 26.3

prevents this court from having jurisdiction over her appeal. Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210.

Consequently, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

Mackey K. Hancock

 Justice

Do not publish.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13
[HOLOGIC LOGO]
                                Promissory Note
                                ---------------


                                 Mortgage Loan

$500,000
--------

For the funds received, the undersigned Jack Cumming (the "Employee") of 12
Cusabo Place Hilton Head SC. 29926, does hereby promise to repay to the order of
Hologic, Inc., of 35 Crosby Drive, Bedford MA., the sum of Five Hundred Thousand
Dollars ($500,000) together with interest accrued on the outstanding principle
balance, if any, from the date of this note at 7% which represents LIBOR plus
1%.

The principle and interest of this note shall be payable each quarter beginning
on January 10, 2002 until paid in full no later than January 10, 2005, whichever
is earlier.

The undersigned employee shall have the right to repay this note in full at
anytime without penalty. All Payments to this note shall first be applied to
accrued interest, if any, then to principle.

In the event of a "Change of Control" of Hologic, Inc., this note will be
considered paid in full.

In the event of termination, either voluntarily or for "'cause", the undersigned
agrees to repay the note prior to the time of separation from the company.
Failure to repay this Note in full may result in attachment of wages or legal
action.

Changes to the above terms will require the approval of the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer.

All rights and obligations hereunder shall be governed by the laws of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Executed on this date, August 30, 2001.

/s/ Jack Cumming                /s/ Glenn P. Muir
--------------------------      -------------------------------
Employee                        Hologic, Inc.


By: Jack Cumming               By:  Glenn P. Muir
   -----------------------         ----------------------------

                              Title:  Executive Vice-President
                                    ---------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH), the authorities under Section 2 of the Breast Cancer and Environmental Research Act of 2008, Public Law 110-354, as amended, which amends Subpart 1 of Part C of Title IV of the Public Health Service Act by adding Section 417F, authorizing the establishment of the Interagency Breast Cancer and Environmental Research Coordinating Committee. I am also delegating the authority under Section 417F of the Public Health Service Act, as amended, to select both voting and nonvoting members of the Committee and to review the necessity of the Committee in the year 2011 and, thereafter, at least once every two years.

This delegation shall be exercised in accordance with the Department's applicable policies, procedures, guidelines, and regulations.

In addition, I ratified and affirmed any actions taken by the NIH Director or his subordinates which involved the exercise of the authorities delegated herein prior to the effective date of this delegation.

This delegation is effective upon date of signature.

Dated: June 23, 2009.

Kathleen Sebelius,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-15439 Filed 6-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### In the Matter of P. David Soares, as District Attorney of Albany County, Respondent, v Stephen W. Herrick, as Judge of *the County*Court of Albany County, Respondent, and Naomi Loomis et al., Appellants.

Submitted October 15, 2012;

decided October 18, 2012

Motion by District Attorneys Association of the State of New York for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 19 copies filed within seven days.
#### ROBBINS et al. v. SPERRY CORPORATION et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Feb. 29, 1940.

Morris J. Levy, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Sullivan & Cromwell, of New York City, for defendants Forgan, Hayes, Freeman and Duryea.

Humes, Buck, Smith & Stowell, of New York City, for defendants Standard Capital Co., J. Cheever Cowdin and George Armsby.

Chadbourne, Wallace, Parke & White-side, of New York City, for defendants Morgan, Sanderson, Royce, Doe and Sperry Corporation.

COXE, District Judge.

This suit is identical with the Piccard suit now pending in this court. It has no possible justification at this time. The plaintiffs do not have an absolute right to discontinue as against the removing defendant. See Young v. Southern Pac. Co., 2 Cir., 25 F.2d 630. Moreover, Rule 23(c), Rules of Civil Procedure for District Courts, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, provides that a class action shall not be dismissed or compromised without the approval of the court. I, therefore, deny the motion of the plaintiffs for leave to discontinue as against the defendant Standard Capital Company. It necessarily follows that the plaintiffs’ motion to remand is also denied. The original and amended complaints fail to allege that the plaintiffs were stockholders at the time of the transactions complained of, as required by Rule 23(b). These are fatal defects. The motions of the defendants to dismiss are, therefore, granted.

The motions of the plaintiffs for leave to’ discontinue as against the defendant Standard Capital Company, and to remand, are denied. The motions of the defendants to dismiss the original and amended complaints are granted.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 22, 2015

No. 04-15-00286-CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, ACTING BY AND THROUGH CITY PUBLIC SERVICE 

BOARD ("CPS ENERGY"),

Appellants

v.

TOMMY HARRAL CONSTRUCTION, INC.,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 383269

Honorable Jason Wolff, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Appellee’s brief was filed July 15, 2015. However, the brief does not contain (1) any 

citations to the record in support of the facts asserted or (2) any citations to or discussion of any 

authority in support of the arguments made. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.2(a)(1), 38.1(i).

We order appellee to file an amended brief by August 6, 2015. If a timely amended brief 

that corrects these deficiencies is not filed, we “may strike the brief, prohibit [appellee] from 

filing another, and proceed as if [appellee] had failed to file a brief.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9(a).

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          94,867
<SECURITIES>                                     8,127
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,977<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     77,613
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               248,140
<PP&E>                                          93,764<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 347,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,277
<BONDS>                                         30,008
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           229
<OTHER-SE>                                     213,478
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   347,890
<SALES>                                        415,950
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               444,033
<CGS>                                          301,393
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  301,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,697
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 80,127
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,877
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             49,250
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,250
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.18<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.09
<FN>
<F1>Accounts Receivable and PP+E are net
<F2>Earnings per share are simple, not primary
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 123 (Monday, June 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31039-31040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15356]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3301-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]


Arkansas; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Arkansas (FEMA-3301-EM), dated January 28, 2009, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: June 20, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Gerard M. 
Stolar, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer 
for this emergency.
    This action terminates the appointment of W. Michael Moore as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this emergency.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA);

[[Page 31040]]

97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing 
Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared 
Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and 
Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to 
Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--
Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, 
Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-15356 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit
32.1




Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Green Irons Holdings Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here
of (the "report"), I, Sandy McDougall, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, President, Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, and a
member of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and




(2)
              The information contained in this
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Green Irons Holdings
Corp., and will be retained by Green Irons Holdings
Corp.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


Dated
this 17th day of
March, 2008.






/s/ Sandy
      McDougallSandy
      McDougallChief
      Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
              President, Principal
      Accounting Officer, Secretary,  Treasurer, and a member of the Board
      of Directors
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND THE UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS OF THE REGISTRANT FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          31,453
<SECURITIES>                                     2,089
<RECEIVABLES>                                  206,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,320
<INVENTORY>                                     58,932
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               341,700
<PP&E>                                         394,592
<DEPRECIATION>                                 249,457
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 588,342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          139,214
<BONDS>                                         10,125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,923
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,069
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   588,342
<SALES>                                        756,925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               768,999
<CGS>                                          442,149
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  442,149
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               194,834
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,289
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,236
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                130,780
<INCOME-TAX>                                    49,176
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    81,604
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.44


</TABLE>
# table69_q9.2_size
12:00 pm Acting Commissioner’s Welcome and Remarks

12:30 pm Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) Labor Market Concentration 

Statistics

Presenter: Imani Drayton-Hill and Trent Thompson

Discussant: John Robertson

1:15 pm Skills Analysis Project

Presenter: Emily Krutsch

Discussant: Michelle Aliff

2:00 pm Break

2:15 pm State Level Consumer Price Indexes

Presenter: Steve Reed

Discussant: Anna Wong and Christine Ries

3:00 pm More Detailed Timing for Injury and Illness Data in Survey of Occupational Injuries and 

Illnesses (SOII)

Presenter: Ben Raymond

Discussant: Sara Wuellner

3:45 pm Discussion of Future Topics and Concluding Remarks

4:00 pm Conclusion

All times Eastern Time.

BLS Data Users Advisory Committee 

November 9, 2023
#### WOODS, Housing Expediter v. CRESSMAN.

Civ. A. No. 8962.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

Nov. 7, 1949.

Sydney J. Fires, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

I. Finkelstein, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.

This is the plaintiff’s objections to the defendant’s interrogatories. These interrogatories all amount to a request for the production of original documents. The proper procedure is under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 34, 28 U.S.C.A. The De Bruce case (De Bruce v. Pennsylvania R. Co.), D.C., 6 F.R.D. 403, which compels the production of copies under Rule 33 has never been extended beyond statements of witnesses as to facts of which they have knowledge. See United States v. Kohler Co., D.C., 9 F.R.D. 289.

The plaintiff’s objections are sustained.

The defendant’s objections to the plaintiff’s second set of interrogatories are overruled and the defendant is directed to answer these interrogatories.