alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 13-987V

Filed: June 25, 2015

Not for Publication

*************************************

HUGO D. GUTIERREZ, *

*

 Petitioner, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision based on

 * stipulation of fact

v. *

 *

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

 *

 Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Peter M. Young, Wasau, WI, for petitioner.

Justine Walters, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

On June 25, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an 

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case. 

In accordance with General Order #9, petitioner asserts that he did not incur any costs in 

pursuit of his petition. Petitioner submitted his request for attorneys’ fees and costs to 

respondent, requesting reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $25,401.44.

Respondent does not object to this amount. The undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. 

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this 

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal 

Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made 

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is 

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and 

move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, 

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall 

redact such material from public access.
2

Accordingly, the court awards $25,401.44, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and 

costs. The award shall be in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and Habush Habush 

& Rottier, S.C. for $25,401.44.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the 

court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 25, 2015 s/ Laura D. Millman

 Laura D. Millman

 Special Master

 

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or 

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
ClBtKof1 Coofir

f-itsr tounroFPlPPBAt'S

50/ fM/A/ srlifBT

UoUS-Totf;tX "7 700£ -£066

li', CasBaJo. Oh/3 -OQ?ll -OH

T/liA/ fj(k IS65US

fr^Ol H>-efLhlW) tMD'BhJhS

7-/6-/5-

FILED IN

1ST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

JUL 22 2015

CHRISTOPHER

CLERK p#r

Si/ij a:'??) iMfci-l'jflfi'hodfiy SE-ekiN* i*> Fo/imAtiohj oti rH^ STATUS o^Aiy Pbo-tt /IesPonsb 76 m

fwoeits 1{L\£T TWhX mAs PYlbd &\tH iou/lo^FiC^

S'lQ-Aoiq.j: IAsr pgctefeO' NorfcB P(Lom VOC/

OC+.JLQ,0,0m STAfi*l§ ffCB ST^rUS Of /ny filESptyflSB

To fih/bB&s IfiiGP vJAs;

li) Was bB^lilBoburhhs hi6r\/Er beetfD&iM

tX) {loyH Uf\$£ is ILzMy fabt s&rpdfiL sub/nissicrJ

Tft simply -see^To kno^ x? /My sr^/xs MM*
&B£iJ irwfeo fiy Submission QiL P£oi*!oiJ wi*t

zTF Hot is TH&kt Anv l\ppimiMM% Tim&

$>£TW££t) iSHBt) TUB Coi/frr files h mrrtf1 AW

rr is si/hrrttrrBV ofc p&ciD&>

Sifl . PUAsB Do dor CotOsioBfi Wis Leir&L As

l\ MfiJOMtfs AcriofJ; bar ftATHBAfi tiB^UBsr

pot irtfomnrtbrJ^s xr A/n APfio-st? ari^T

fif/6 Do a/oT Kno'vJ THF P/loOBsSBS By wHlcp

yov/i Lovht dPefrtrr&s*

I^BspBarpt/ily j

/mcCo*/*)£ll (/fljif

&£~£\li\\Bj-rx -77103
I

/K]cCotJfOBii yr\iY

%ooi s* Bmily P^

$>&0\/i\\£>-rx 11103

SAM- jmTrMlQ' T-K ?&&

RIO •'GRAMOE DISTRICT , - -

20 3UL 20X5 PM 3 L

JUL 2 2 2015

7!r700220&&SS

f NOISI&IQ' S-NQIinXIJLSKl I

" l.VNOI19a-ttUOa*99l4$fllf \

l 1VN-IIAIIU3 JO 1N3IAIJ.UV43Q i

[ SVX31 Aa aaioa-dSNi ion

fldsrCovtor OPApfBAh

''tfous-roNt-ryi 11063--J

"j*j*T«l»fl'M|f«»J|J|#J|JI*"i«J|ff|l|l|t«ii|iji«i|lii*

/
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Gold Bag, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 23, 2009 (the Report), I, Lance Ayers, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Lance Ayers                                        
|Lance Ayers                                            
|Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
|December 23, 2009                                      

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31277-31278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15391]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. [thinsp]225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board 
has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and 
permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than July 27, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Nadine Wallman, Vice 
President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., Pittsburgh, 
Pennsylvania; to acquire the lesser of $75 million or 5.4 percent of 
the voting shares of First Niagara Financial Group, Inc., Lockport, NY, 
and thereby indirectly acquire First Niagara Bank, Lockport, New York, 
and engage in operating a savings association pursuant to section 
225.28(b)(4) of Regulation Y.


[[Page 31278]]


    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 25, 2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-15391 Filed 6-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1287

GARY D. HICKS; CLYDE CASEY; JEAN CASEY,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

WILSHIRE CREDIT CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:06-cv02195-RWT)

Submitted: November 30, 2007 Decided: January 7, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

M. Albert Figinski, John A. Pica, Jr., Michael W. Reed, Thomas P.

Kelly, LAW OFFICES OF PETER G. ANGELOS, PC, Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellants. Brian L. Moffet, GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN,

HOFFBERGER & HOLLANDER, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Gary Hicks, Clyde Casey, and Jean Casey appeal the

district court’s order denying their motion to remand and granting

Wilshire Credit Corporation’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to

dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on

appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court at the hearing held on

February 26, 2007. Hicks v. Wilshire Credit Corp., No. 8:06-cv02195-RWT) (D. Md. Feb. 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on May 8, 2009, Chattem Chemicals Inc., 3801 St. Elmo Avenue, Building 18, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37409, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedules I and II: Drug
Schedule4-Methoxyamphetamine (7411)
IDihydromorphine (9145)
IAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethamphetamine (1105)
IILisdexamfetamine (1205)
IIMethylphenidate (1724)
IIPentobarbital (2270)
IICodeine (9050)
IIDihydrocodeine (9120)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIMeperidine (9230)
IIMorphine (9300)
IIOripavine (9330)
IIThebaine (9333)
IIOxymorphone (9652)
IINoroxymorphone (9668)
IIAlfentanil (9737)
IIRemifentanil (9739)
IISufentanil (9740)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for distribution to its customers. Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than August 31, 2009. Dated: June 22, 2009. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. E9-15442 Filed 6-29-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
# covid_table8_q3_state
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0482. JACKSON et al. v. EMPIRE PARKING SERVICES, INC. et al.

We granted Lindsay Jackson and James Hugh Potts II’s application for

discretionary review of the trial court’s order assessing attorney fees against them

pursuant to OCGA § 9-15-14 (b). 

After reviewing the record in its entirety, we find no error in the trial court’s

decision. Thus, the application for discretionary appeal was improvidently granted.

Accordingly, the order granting Jackson and Potts’ application is vacated, and their

appeal is dismissed. See Collier v. Dept. of Human Resources, 196 Ga. App. 843, 844

(397 SE2d 632) (1990) (dismissing discretionary appeal as improvidently granted

where full consideration of the record revealed no error in lower court’s ruling).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/13/2015

July 13, 2015
|EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors
RehabCare Group, Inc.:
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No. 33-43236 on Form S-8, registration statement No. 33-67944 on Form S-8, registration statement No.
33-82106 on Form S-8, registration statement No. 33-82048 on Form S-8, registration statement No. 333-11311 on Form S-8, and registration statement No. 333-120005 on Form S-8 of RehabCare Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 16, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of RehabCare Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over finanical reporting as of December 31, 2004 which reports appear in the December
31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of RehabCare Group, Inc.
Our report refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangibles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
March 16, 2005
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|
|
, fY!v na -~'¥) e , 11 c c, '('· ,-e """C( .~. .. ,.':'1_,1-;J -;"·'\ \". ' 'I,. . I -''· \,;; "-· ~·, (.,.• '' ""'·. 

~~~­

-· ,\;.. I 

S' enol r-Y1e c .. 

.JJr.,.) -IJ··· / ..,--; )"l 1 Jv ...-, 1..."" r, 

oloc .. k.e t:. shee~
Exhibit 32.02
                                                                  -------------



                                 CERTIFICATION

     I, Debi B. Halbert, the Chief Financial Officer of ProFutures, Inc., as
general partner of ProFutures Diversified Fund, L.P., certify that (i) the
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 of ProFutures Diversified Fund,
L.P. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ProFutures
Diversified Fund, L.P.



                                    PROFUTURES DIVERSIFIED FUND, L.P.

                                    By: ProFutures, Inc., general partner



                                    By: /s/ Debi B. Halbert

                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Debi B. Halbert
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        March 29, 2006
Order entered July 21, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01381-CR

WILLIAM SEDRIC AUTREY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-81194-10

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 422 

Expressing support for the designation of the first Tuesday in June as 

‘‘National Cancer Survivor Beauty and Support Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2019 

Mr. SCHNEIDER (for himself, Mr. HUIZENGA, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, and Ms. KELLY of Illinois) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of the first Tuesday 

in June as ‘‘National Cancer Survivor Beauty and Support Day’’. 

Whereas it is estimated that 1,762,450 new cases of cancer 

will be diagnosed in the United States in 2019; 

Whereas the lifetime probability of a male or female developing cancer is 1 in 3; 

Whereas a cancer survivor is defined as anyone who has been 

diagnosed with cancer, from the time of diagnosis 

through the balance of his or her life; 

Whereas the National Cancer Institute reports that there are 

16,900,000 cancer survivors in the United States; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 422 IH 

Whereas cancer treatments can have severe, prolonged, or 

permanent side effects, both physical and psychological; 

Whereas men, women, and children all have been diagnosed 

with and battled cancer; 

Whereas it is important to recognize the value of support for 

all men, women, and children who are cancer survivors 

and the positive impact support has for both patients and 

families; 

Whereas ‘‘Cancer Survivor Beauty and Support Day’’ is a 

purely volunteer event where thousands of volunteers 

from the spa, beauty, and related industries freely give 

their support and services to all cancer survivors; 

Whereas ‘‘Cancer Survivor Beauty and Support Day’’ has expanded to thousands of salons in all 50 States since its 

inception in 2003; 

Whereas ‘‘Cancer Survivor Beauty and Support Day’’ is recognized by both State and local governments; 

Whereas ‘‘Cancer Survivor Beauty and Support Day’’ is the 

only event of its kind, with no solicitation of funds either 

before, during, or after the event; and 

Whereas the first Tuesday in June would be an appropriate 

date to designate as ‘‘National Cancer Survivor Beauty 

and Support Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of ‘‘National Cancer Survivor Beauty and 

3 Support Day’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT




                                                             State or Providence
                                                               of Incorporation
Company                                                        or Organization
-------                                                        ---------------

Kimmins Contracting Corp.......................................  Florida

Kimmins Ltd....................................................  Ontario, Canada

Kimmins Industrial Service Corp................................  Delaware

Kimmins Abatement Corp.........................................  Delaware

ThermoCor Kimmins, Inc.........................................  Florida
   (f/k/a Kimmins Thermal Corp.)

Kimmins Specialty Contracting, Inc.............................  Florida

Kimmins Associates, Inc........................................  Delaware

Kimmins Equipment Leasing Corp................................   Florida

TransCor Waste Services, Inc...................................  Florida

Bay Area Recycling and Fibers, Inc.............................  Florida

Kimmins Incorporated...........................................  Texas

Kimmins International..........................................  Florida

Factory Street Corporation.....................................  Tennessee