alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 544 

Recognizing Islam as one of the great religions of the world. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 30, 2019 

Mr. GREEN of Texas (for himself, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Ms. TLAIB, and 

Ms. OMAR) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Islam as one of the great religions of the world. 

Whereas the word ‘‘Islam’’ means ‘‘submission to the will of 

God’’ and ‘‘peace’’; 

Whereas the primary scripture of Islam is the Quran; 

Whereas Muslims consider the Quran in its original Arabic 

to be the book of divine guidance; 

Whereas, although its roots go back further, scholars typically date the revelation of Islam to the seventh century; 

Whereas Islam is the second largest religion in the world 

after Christianity; 

Whereas Islam is the fastest growing religion of the world; 

Whereas it is estimated that there are approximately 

1,800,000,000 Muslims worldwide; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 544 IH 

Whereas Islam contains in itself the essential principles of all 

earlier religions; 

Whereas Islam is a strongly monotheistic religion with the 

worship of one God as its central theme; 

Whereas Islam is a complete system of strong moral convictions that promote peace, equality, and social justice; 

Whereas Islam encourages service to humanity; 

Whereas Islam teaches abstaining from worldly desires in 

favor of spiritual achievements; 

Whereas Islam instills a genuine love of God; 

Whereas the fundamental Muslim practices are known as the 

Five Pillars of Islam; 

Whereas the five pillars are shahadah (declaration of faith), 

salat (daily prayers), zakat (giving of alms), sawm (fasting in Ramadan), and Hajj (pilgrimage to Mecca); 

Whereas the five daily prayers remove any barriers between 

believers praying in congregations and helps one refrain 

from committing sins; 

Whereas the obligatory charity purifies a person from selfishness and encourages empathy to the poor; 

Whereas fasting in Ramadan promotes self-restraint and 

spiritual renewal for Muslims worldwide; 

Whereas the pilgrimage to Mecca serves as a unifying force 

in Islam by bringing followers of diverse background together in religious celebration; 

Whereas Muslims consider Islam to be a way of life; and 

Whereas carrying out these obligations provides the framework of a Muslim’s life, and weaves their everyday activiVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:41 Aug 30, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR544.IH HR544

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 544 IH 

ties and their beliefs into a single cloth of religious devotion: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That in order to demonstrate solidarity with 

2 and support for members of the community of Islam in 

3 the United States and throughout the world, the House 

4 of Representatives recognizes the Islamic faith as one of 

5 the great religions of the world. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 15.1



LOGO

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms

The Board of Directors of BHP Billiton Limited and BHP Billiton Plc:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-206983) on Form F-3 of BHP Billiton Finance (USA) Limited and the
registration statements (Nos. 333- 100496, 333-141531 and 333-160636) on Form S-8 of BHP Billiton Limited of our reports dated 28 September 2017, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the BHP Group (comprising BHP Billiton Plc, BHP
Billiton Limited and their respective subsidiaries) as of 30 June 2017 and 30 June 2016, and the related consolidated income statements, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, consolidated statements of changes in equity and
consolidated cash flow statements for each of the years in the three-year period ended 30 June 2017, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of 30 June 2017, which reports appear in the 30 June 2017
Annual Report on Form 20-F of the BHP Group.



|                       |  |                     
|---------------------- |  | --------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP           |  | /s/ KPMG            
|KPMG LLP               |  | KPMG                
|London, United Kingdom |  | Melbourne, Australia
|28 September 2017      |  | 28 September 2017
<PAGE>
                                                          Exhibit 23


                       Consent of Independent Auditors


We  consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 33-55131, Form S-8 No. 333-28101, Form S-8 No. 333-28065, Form
S-8 No. 333-103069 and Form S-3/A No. 33-55131) of Sterling Financial
Corporation and in the related prospectuses of our report dated January 27,
2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Sterling
Financial Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31,2003.


                                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 12, 2004
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00364

- CR

Ronnie White Jr. v. The State of Texas

On a ppeal from the 24th District Court of De Witt County , Texas Trial Cause No. 17

- 11

- 12,792

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cau se on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction

. The Court
orders the appeal DISMISSED FOR W ANT OF JURISDICTION in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. September 5, 201 9
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15218]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,913]

Performance Powder Coatings LLC, Kokomo, IN; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on May 12, 2009 in response to a worker 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at 
Performance Powder Coatings, LLC, Kokomo, Indiana.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of May 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-15218 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
@article{1211031,
  author = {Prem Rachakonda and Geraldine S. Cheok and Marek Franaszek and Kamel S. Saidi},
  title = {Evaluating the depth resolution of 3D sensors for manufacturing automation applications},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-07-21 04:07:00},
  publisher = {Measurement},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=935408},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113307},
  language = {en},
}
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 14 (Friday, January 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4179-4180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1352]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-505-000]


WC Landfill Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

January 14, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
WC Landfill Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is February 3, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed

[[Page 4180]]

dockets(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e282b3c2d21000207000b3d1b1e1e011c1a2e080b1c0d40090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c2848790818dacaeabaca791b7b2b2adb0b682a4a7b0a1eca5adb4">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-1352 Filed 1-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.1


 



Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement







Amendment Number 1 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of October 19, 2010 (the “Employment Agreement”) by and between Aetna Inc. (“Aetna”), a Pennsylvania corporation, and Mark T. Bertolini (“Executive”).







WHEREAS, Aetna and Executive have previously entered into the Employment Agreement;







WHEREAS, Aetna and Executive wish to further amend the Employment Agreement to extend its term;







NOW, THEREFORE, the Employment Agreement is amended effective August 4, 2013, as follows:







Section 1.02 is amended to change the references to December 31, 2013 in the first and second sentences to December 31, 2016.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Amendment to be executed this 4th day of August, 2013.







Aetna Inc.


 




	/s/ Deanna Fidler	 
	By:	Deanna Fidler	 
	Title: 	Sr. Vice President, Human Resources	 





 

 




Executive


 




	/s/ Mark T. Bertolini	 
	Mark T. Bertolini
#### Viviana Medina et al., Plaintiffs, and Iris Dedos, Appellant, v Crecencio Medina, Defendant, and James M. Gutierrez, Respondent.

[853 NYS2d 77]

There is no merit to plaintiffs argument that defendant’s prima facie showing was rendered deficient by his physician’s acknowledgment that a bulging disc was revealed by the MRI of plaintiffs lumbar spine taken shortly after the accident *(see Lloyd v Green,*45 AD3d 373 [2007]; *Kearse v New York City Tr. Auth.,*16 AD3d 45, 49-50 [2005]). In opposition, plaintiff adduced no medical evidence of impingement or other neurologic deficits that could be attributed to a bulging disc, and the objectively tested range of motion limitations noted in plaintiffs lumbar spine, as well as her cervical spine, left knee and shoulder, were not assessed until nearly five years after the accident, too remote to raise an issue of fact as to whether the restrictions were caused by the accident *(see Lopez v Simpson,*39 AD3d 420 [2007]). The excerpts from an arthoscopic operative report on plaintiffs left knee, included in plaintiffs bill of particulars, indicates only a partial tear of the anterior cruciate ligament, and there is no evidence that surgical repair of the knee was performed. We have considered plaintiffs 90/180-day claim and find that it too lacks merit. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman and Nardelli, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LifeCare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Chris A. Walker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 12, 2011



/s/ Chris A. WalkerChris A. WalkerChief Financial Officer




33
@misc{1212096,
  author = {Marcos Motta de Souza and Bala Muralikrishnan and Vincent Lee and Daniel S. Sawyer},
  title = {Laser tracker relative range error evaluation by the back-to-back, common path single pass, and common path double pass methods},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-08-16 04:08:00},
  publisher = {NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936158},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8468},
  language = {en},
}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000810999
<NAME> 87A.
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         383,854
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  290,867
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               674,721
<PP&E>                                      20,138,832
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,020,451
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,793,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,856
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,736,246
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,793,102
<SALES>                                      2,232,898
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,258,684
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,308,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (49,528)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (49,528)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (49,528)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00147-CV

In the Interest of T.G., L.G., and 

M.G., Children

§

§

§

§

From the 323rd District Court

of Tarrant County (323-99403J-13)

July 16, 2015

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Russell James, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 474]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Michael Gross, J.), rendered on or about December 8, 2004, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Tom, J.P, Saxe, Friedman, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-03-030-CV

IN RE E.Z. FLOORS, A DIVISION OF 	RELATOR

E.Z. CERAMICS, INC.

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	We have considered relator’s “Motion tTo Dismiss Petition For Writ of Mandamus.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss this original proceeding.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

							PER CURIAM

PANEL B:	WALKER, HOLMAN, , and GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

[DELIVERED MARCH 7, 2003]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 060 2 IN THE MATTER OF: B.A.B. , Respondent and Appellant . **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 2 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 27 2021

04/27/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0602
@conference{1216391,
  author = {Harrison M. Skye and Piotr A. Domanski and Mark O. McLinden and Valeri I. Babushok and Ian Bell and Tara Fortin and Michael Hegetschweiler and Marcia L. Huber and Mark A. Kedzierski and Dennis Kim and Lingnan Lin and Gregory T. Linteris and Stephanie L. Outcalt and Vance (Wm.) Payne and Richard A. Perkins and Aaron Rowane},
  title = {Lower-GWP Non-Flammable Refrigerant Blends to Replace HFC-134a},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-08-21 04:08:00},
  publisher = {Proceedings of the 26th IIR International Congress of Refrigeration: Paris, France, August 21-25, 2023, Paris, FR},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936371},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.18462/iir.icr.2023.0943},
  language = {en},
}
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julio Rodriguez, Appellant.

Submitted February 19, 2013;

decided March 21, 2013

Motion for poor person relief granted.
@article{1206481,
  author = {Bingqian Liu and Avery Baumann and Megan Butala and V. Sara Thoi},
  title = {Phosphate-Functionalized MOF-808 for High Performance Li-S Batteries},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-05-08 04:05:00},
  publisher = {Chemistry-A European Journal},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=935045},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202300821},
  language = {en},
}
Filed 7/15/15 P. v. Carlisle CA2/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

MARTIN DELANO CARLISLE,

Defendant and Appellant.

 B261617

 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. 

 No. MA063224)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 

Christopher Estes, Judge. Affirmed.

Carlos Ramirez, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and 

Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

_________________________
2

In June 2014, defendant and appellant Martin Delano Carlisle entered a plea of no 

contest to resisting an executive officer (Pen. Code, § 69),1 and admitted suffering a prior 

conviction under the three strikes law (§§ 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d), 667, subds. (b)-(i).) He 

was sentenced to 32 months in state prison. On December 31, 2014, the trial court denied 

defendant’s petition for resentencing as a misdemeanant under the ameliorative 

provisions of Proposition 47 (entitled “The Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act”). 

Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal. This court appointed counsel for 

defendant on appeal. Appointed counsel filed a brief raising no issues, but requesting this 

court to independently review the record for arguable contentions pursuant to People v. 

Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Defendant was advised on his right to file a supplemental 

brief within 30 days. No brief has been received from defendant.

We have completed our independent review of the record. There are no arguable 

appellate issues. Misdemeanor resentencing under Proposition 47 is available to “[a]

person currently serving a sentence for a conviction” under “Sections 11350, 11357, or 

11377 of the Health and Safety Code, or Section 459.5, 473, 476a, 490.2, 496, or 666 of 

the Penal Code.” (§ 1170.18, subd. (a).) Defendant is not eligible for resentencing under 

Proposition 47 because section 69 is not among the offenses specified in section 1170.18, 

subdivision (a). The trial court properly denied the petition for resentencing.

The judgment is affirmed. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259.)

KRIEGLER, J. 

We concur: 

 

1 All statutory references are to the Penal Code, unless otherwise stated.
3

TURNER, P. J. MOSK, J.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-24-00100-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.G. AND H.G.,

CHILDREN

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 231st District 

Court

of Tarrant County (231-554711-14)

April 11, 2024

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350   I, Eldon D. Dietterick, Executive Vice President and Treasurer of Blue Ridge Real Estate Company and Big Boulder Corporation (together, the Registrants), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1) The Registrants Annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrants.  Date:  January 28, 2011 /s/ Eldon D. Dietterick Eldon D. Dietterick Executive Vice President and Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)
ACCEPTED

12-15-00141-CV

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

7/10/2015 9:58:42 AM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 7/10/2015 9:58:42 AM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk