alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.4


 



Confidential Materials omitted and filed separately with the


Securities and Exchange Commission. Double asterisks denote omissions.


 







 








	
 













  


SECTION B – SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS


	
ITEM

	
SUPPLIES/SERVICES

	
QTY/UNIT

	
UNIT

 PRICE

	
EXTENDED PRICE


	
0002-02

	
BioThrax [**] product 


BioThrax [**] product 


[**] upon date of delivery [**]


 


Corresponds to Line Item 0002B in contract.


 


To be delivered in accordance with the delivery schedule below

	
[**] Doses

	
$[**]

	
$[**]


	
 

	
Line(s) Of Accounting: 939ZTGA 2642 2012 75-X-0956 5664711101 $[**]

	
 

	
 

	
 





Option 1 Option for Additional Items:


	
ITEM

	
SUPPLIES/SERVICES

	
QTY/UNIT

	
UNIT

 PRICE

	
EXTENDED PRICE


	
0002-02

	
BioThrax [**] product 


BioThrax [**] product


[**] upon date of delivery [**]


 


To be delivered in accordance with the delivery schedule below

	
[**] Doses

	
$[**]

	
$[**]


	
 

	
Line(s) Of Accounting: 939ZTGA 2642 2012 75-X-0956 5664711101 [**]

	
 

	
 

	
 





The purpose of this modification is to transfer funds between CLINS, modify the product doses as described and incorporate these in scope changes to contract #200-2011-42084.



	
A.

	
The contract funded amount for CLIN 0002 is decreased by $[**] from $[**] to $[**]. CLIN0002 is reduced in quantity from [**] product doses to [**] product doses.







As a result:



	
1.

	
CLIN 0002- 02 is is funded in the amount of $[**] for [**] product doses.








	
2.

	
Section C.2 Delivery Schedule and section F.3.1 are revised as follows:


















 












	
Product

	
 


	
CLIN

	
Price per

 Dose

	
Doses

	
$

	
Delivery Period


	
0001

	
[**]

	
[**]

	
[**]

	
October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2012


	
0002

	
[**]

	
[**]

	
[**]

	
January 1, 2013 to November 30, 2013


	
0002-02

	
[**]

	
[**]

	
[**]

	
January 1, 2013 to November 30, 2014


	
0003

	
[**]

	
[**]

	
[**]

	
December 1, 2013 to November 30, 2014


	
0004

	
[**]

	
[**]

	
[**]

	
December 1, 2014 to October 31, 2015


	
0005

	
[**]

	
[**]

	
[**]

	
November 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016


	
Total

	
 

	
44,750,000

	
$1,234,775,641.30

	
 










Consider all other terms and conditions of the contract unchanged and in full force and effect.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00022-CR

Jeremiah Brigham Young

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

2nd 25th District Court of Lavaca County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13-06-9449

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 27, 2014
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL J. KAHANE,

Appellant,

v.

DETECTIVE ANGELA C. FLOWERS and KEN MASCARA, SHERIFF ST. 

LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA,

Appellees.

No. 4D19-285

[February 6, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Martin County; William L. Roby, Judge; L.T. Case No. 432018CA000544.

Michael J. Kahane, Defuniak Springs, pro se.

Harrison A. Joss and Bruce W. Jolly of Purdy, Jolly, Giuffreda, 

Barranco & Jisa, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Matthew Hutchins, Chief Financial and Executive Officer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of iBroadband, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c.

Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a.

All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:   August 14, 2007



By:

/s/ Matthew Hutchins





Chief Financial and Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 559 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 559

 Expressing support for designation of the week of September 15, 2019, 
       through September 21, 2019, as ``Balance Awareness Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2019

  Ms. Johnson of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for designation of the week of September 15, 2019, 
       through September 21, 2019, as ``Balance Awareness Week''.

Whereas vestibular (inner-ear-balance) disorders are underdiagnosed and 
        undertreated;
Whereas as many as 35 percent of adults 40 years of age and older in the United 
        States, approximately 69,000,000 people in the United States, have 
        experienced some form of vestibular dysfunction;
Whereas 80 percent of people 65 years of age and older have experienced 
        dizziness;
Whereas vestibular disorder patients may consult 4 or more physicians and spend 
        50 months or more in their search for a diagnosis;
Whereas the Vestibular Disorders Association celebrates ``Balance Awareness 
        Week'' to reduce the time it takes to diagnose a vestibular disorder by 
        helping patients recognize their symptoms and encouraging them to seek 
        help from a qualified vestibular specialist; and
Whereas the week of September 15, 2019, through September 21, 2019, would be an 
        appropriate week to designate as ``Balance Awareness Week'': Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``Balance Awareness Week''; 
        and
            (2) recognizes the importance of raising public awareness 
        about vestibular disorders.
                                 <all>
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R ECONSIDERATION E N B ANC

Appellat e case name: Javier Noel Campos v

. The State of Texas

Appellate case number s : 01

- 13

- 00415

- CR , 01

- 13

- 00416

- CR, 01

- 13

- 00417

- CR

Trial court case number s : 1328806 , 1328807, 1308988

Trial court: 184th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: February 2, 2015

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is order ed that the motion for reconsideration en banc is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

Acting Individually Acting for the Court

En Banc C ourt consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland,

Massengale, Brown, Huddle, and Lloyd

Date: February 19 , 2015
H. Res. 773 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 19, 2019. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM: Ms. Porter 

and Ms. Haaland. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000833526
<NAME>                         GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP II-D

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                            490,135
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     513,748
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,003,883
<PP&E>                         16,787,859
<DEPRECIATION>                 14,547,242
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  3,660,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             174,158
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                      3,339,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    3,660,312
<SALES>                           832,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  835,689
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     413,526
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   422,163
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               422,163
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      422,163
<EPS-BASIC>                          1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0



</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 20, 2015

NO. 03

- 15

- 00072

- CR

Clemente Alejandro Davila, Appellant

v.
The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 421ST DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AN D BOURLAND MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment adjudicating guilt entered by the tr i a l court. Having
reviewed the record and the parties’ argum ents, the Court ho lds that there was no error in the

court’s judgment requiring reversal . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment
adjudicating guilt. However, there was error in the judgment adjudicating guilt that requires

correction. T herefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt as

follows: to reflect that the “Offense for which Defendant Convicted” is “A ggravated Sexual
Assault of a Child,” the “Statute for Offense” is “22.021(a)(1)(B)(i), (2)(B) Penal Code,”
appellant’s “Plea to Motion to Adjudicate” was “Not True,” and appellant’s surname is “Davila.”
The judgment, as modified, is affirmed

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs,
no adjudication of costs is made.
#### In the Matter of Gottlieb Contracting, Inc., Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent.

[858 NYS2d 87]

*410Petitioner sought payment for electrical work under a 1984 contract with the City’s Department of General Services (DOGS). The terms of the contract required that claims thereunder be brought within one year.

Release of the amounts purportedly due herein involves the exercise of a discretionary municipal function, not a ministerial one, requiring certification by the administering agency’s engineer and approval from its commissioner. That being the case, mandamus relief is not appropriate *(see Matter of Hamptons Hosp. & Med. Ctr. v Moore,*52 NY2d 88, 96 [1981]). Even had the claim been brought as a plenary action, it would have been untimely, thus rendering conversion under CPLR 103 (c) academic.

The work was substantially completed in July 1988. On October 25, 1989, DOGS rejected petitioner’s application for partial payment for change order work. Petitioner filed a notice of claim in March 1992, seeking, inter alia, the balance due on the contract and change orders, but failed to pursue such claim.

This proceeding would have been untimely regardless of whether the statute of limitations had begun to run upon DOGS’ rejection of the claim for partial payment in 1989 or upon the City’s failure to pay on the notice of claim in March 1992, and regardless of whether the applicable period of limitation was one year under the contract or six years by statute.

Petitioner has offered no basis for tolling the statute of limitations or otherwise excusing its delay in commencing this action, alleging only that its file was misplaced for several years as a result of an office move in 1992. Its claim that the statute was tolled with regard to its entitlement to a retainage maintained in a custodial account, for which petitioner was billed annually by the City, is unpreserved, and in any event is unsupported by the record.

The nearly 17-year delay in advancing this claim since the substantial completion of the work has left respondent unable to confirm or refute the claim. DOGS no longer even exists, having merged with another agency in 1996, and petitioner has failed to establish compliance with the procedures required for issuance of final payment or release of the retainage. To the contrary, petitioner concedes that it refused to waive its claims against the City, a condition precedent to payment.

We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Williams, Buckley and Acosta, JJ. *[See*2007 NY Slip Op 30014(U).]
#### In the Matter of Ralph T. Byrd, a Suspended Attorney, Appellant. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Respondent.

Decided March 28, 2013

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
#### KNUPFER v. ALBERTSON & CO., Inc.

District Court, W. D. New York.

March 15, 1940.

*258Franchot, Runals, Cohen, Taylor & Rickert, of Niagara Falls, N. Y., for plaintiff.

Williams, Bradbury, McCaleb & Hinkle, of Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

BURKE, District Judge.

The plaintiff sues for an accounting and recovery of royalties which he claims are due him from the defendant under an assignment of a license agreement.

The defendant moves on three grounds to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The first is disposed of by the filing at the argument of a bill of particulars supplementing the complaint. The second and third were not pressed on the argument. We think there is no merit in them.

The defendant also moves for a bill of particulars pursuant to Rule 12(e) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c. The defendant is entitled to the information sought under 2(f) of its motion. By this the defendant seeks the particulars as to what products covered by the license agreement plaintiff claims that defendant made or sold. This, we think, is necessary to prepare a responsive pleading. With such information defendant may plead that it never manufactured or sold any such articles as plaintiff claims, or that the articles manufactured or sold as plaintiff claims were not covered by the license agreement. It is true that defendant knows best what articles it manufactured and sold, but it does not know what articles made or sold by it are claimed by the plaintiff to be covered by the license agreement.

All other demands of the defendant for particulars are without the general purpose of a bill of particulars under the new rules. Without attempting to particularize as to each demand it is sufficient to say that under the new rules the function of a bill of particulars is to secure information necessary to prepare a responsive pleading and to generally prepare for trial. Particular information necessary upon the trial should be procured under the rules relating to interrogatories, depositions and discovery. Matters of evidence are not required to be furnished under Rule 12(e), nor are matters peculiarly within the knowledge of the moving party.

Except as indicated the motion is denied. Particulars ordered may be furnished within 10 days. Answer may be served within 10 days after service of bill of particulars. Submit order.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION 
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a) 
OF THE U.S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I,

Sokhie Puar

, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this report for the fiscal quarter ended

September 30, 2006

 of Georgia Exploration, Inc.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statement, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the annual report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers control over financial reporting.



Date: November 14, 2006

By:

/s/ Sokhie Puar

Sokhie Puar

President and Principal Financial Officer
@conference{1214101,
  author = {Lorenzo Neil and Shanee Dawkins and Jody Jacobs and Julia Sharp},
  title = {Peering into the Phish Bowl: An Analysis of Real-World Phishing Cues},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-08-07 04:08:00},
  publisher = {Proceedings of the Nineteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, Anaheim, CA, US},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=956178},
  language = {en},
}
<PAGE>

                                                     (Exhibit 11)

                      AMERICOLD CORPORATION

               STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF
                       PER SHARE EARNINGS
              (In thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                          Year ended last day of February
                                                        1995            1996           1997
                                                     ----------      ----------     ----------
<S>                                                 <C>             <C>            <C>

Net income (loss)                                    $  5,564          $ (9,874)     $ (6,540) 

Less:  total accrued preferred dividend

  (49.672 shares x 11.50% x 4/12 yr)                     (190)                -             -

  (55.384 shares x 13.50% x 7/12 yr)                     (436)                -             -

  (52.936 shares x 13.50% x 1/12 yr)                      (60)                -             -

  (52.936 shares x 13.50% x 12/12 yr)                       -              (715)            -

  (52.936 shares x 13.50% x 4/12 yr)                        -                 -          (237)

  (52.936 shares x 13.00% x 8/12 yr)                        -                 -          (458)
                                                      -------           -------        -------

Net income (loss) for per share calculation          $  4,878          $(10,589)     $ (7,235)
                                                      =======           =======       =======

Weighted average number of shares
  outstanding                                           4,864             4,867         4,952
                                                      =======           =======       =======

Net income (loss) per share                          $   1.00          $  (2.17)     $  (1.46)
                                                      =======           =======       ========

</TABLE>