alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO.

JOSE VELEZ § IN THE COURT OF

§

V. § CRIMINAL APPEALS

STATE OF TEXAS § OF TEXAS RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

PRO SE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW JUL 13 2015

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

... u AbslAcosta,Clerk COMES NOW, petitioner in the above-styled and numbered^ cause and

respectfully moves this Honorable Court to extend the time for

filing his Petition for Discretionary Review in this cause and

in support he would show as follows:

1. The style and number of this case in the Court of Appeals

is Jose Velez v. State of Texas, Appeal No.01-14-00544-CR

riLbU IN

2. The style and number of this case in the trial (^Jffl-^F^HI^tM-WPEALS

of Texas v. Jose Velez, Cause No. 2013-CR-0307C from theyjl8j7^tlr0'i5

District Court, Bexar County,Texas.

Abel Acosta, Cierk

3. Appellant was convicted of the felony offense of murder.

4. Judgment was entered and punishment was assessed at (45) forty-five

years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

5. Conviction was affirmed in the Court of Appeals First District

of Texas at Houston, on June 4,2015.

6. The deadline for filing petition for discretionary review in this

case is July 4, 2015, or (15) fifteen days from that date(See T.R.A.P.

10.5(b) )

7. An extension of time of (60) sixty days is sought which would

make the deadline September 19,2015.

8. No prior requests for an extension of time has been made.

9. The facts relied upon to show good cause for the requested

extension are: Petitioner was transferred to the Coffield Unit from

the Connally Unit on April 29,2015. His lawyers letter addressed

-1-
to his last Unit (Connally) arrived at the Coffield Unit June 29,

2015. The Coffield Unit mailroom notified him then. Petitioner.. needs

time to hire an attorney and or research the basis for filing a

pro se petition for discretionary review. Further, having received

notice on or about June 29 he has not been afforded enough time

to do anything but file this motion.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, petitioner prays for the relief

requested that the Court extend his time to file his pro se petition

for discretionary review.

Respectfully submitted

Jose VeleS #1930040

Coffield Unit

2661 FM 2054

Tennessee COLONY, Texas 75884

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Jose Velez #1930040 hereby certifies that a true and correct copy

of this "Pro se Motion Requesting Extension of Time To File Petition

For Discretionary Review" was sent to the Clerk of the Court of

Criminal Appeals of Texas by U.S. mail postage prepaid to: P.O. Box

12308 Capitol Station, Austin, Texas 78701.

Executed on this $ik day of <JcJUa 20:)15. W&&&' Vii

signatu

-2-
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, David Gorodyansky, the Chief Financial Officer of INTELLIGENT
BUYING. INC.  (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.
The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010
(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 11th day of
August 2010.





/s/ David
Gorodyansky





David
Gorodyansky


Principal
Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Intelligent Buying, Inc. and will be retained by Intelligent Buying, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             265
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,714)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          83,495
<DEPRECIATION>                                (70,115)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                          3,731
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,865
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,205
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,475
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (43)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 150
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    551
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                551
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       551
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |   |                                              |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: May 9, 2011    | By:    | /s/ Thomas Sperzel                           |   |
|                                |   | Thomas Sperzel                                    |   |
|                                |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                                |   |                                              |   |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6445

TONY J. WALTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DAVID BALLARD, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, 

at Charleston. Thomas E. Johnston, Chief District Judge. (2:15-cv-11423)

Submitted: August 31, 2018 Decided: September 13, 2018

Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony J. Walton, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tony J. Walton seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

(2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner 

must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the 

petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 

484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Walton has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15166]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of a Change in Status of an Extended Benefit (EB) Period 
for Florida

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a change in benefit period eligibility 
under the EB program for Florida.
    The following change has occurred since the publication of the last 
notice regarding Florida's EB status:
    <bullet> Florida has modified its law by adding a total 
unemployment rate (TUR) trigger retroactive to February 1, 2009. As a 
result, Florida has retroactively triggered ``on'' to a high 
unemployment period (HUP) for weeks of unemployment beginning February 
22, 2009, and eligible unemployed workers will be able to collect up to 
an additional 20 weeks of unemployment insurance benefits.

Information for Claimants

    The duration of benefits payable in the EB program, and the terms 
and conditions on which they are payable, are governed by the Federal-
State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, as amended, and 
the operating instructions issued to the states by the U.S. Department 
of Labor. In the case of a state beginning an HUP, the State Workforce 
Agency will furnish a written notice of potential entitlement to each 
individual who has exhausted all rights to regular benefits and is 
potentially eligible for EB (20 CFR 615.13(c)(1)). Persons who believe 
they may be entitled to EB or who wish to inquire about their rights 
under the program should contact their State Workforce Agency.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Gibbons, U.S. Department of 
Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Workforce 
Security, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Frances Perkins Building, Room 
S-4231, Washington, DC 20210, telephone number (202) 693-3008 (this is 
not a toll-free number) or by e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6a0d030808050419441909051e1e2a0e0506440d051c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5a3d333838353429742939352e2e1a3e3536743d352c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 19th day of June 2009.
Douglas F. Small,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-15166 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 33-50869) and Form S-3
(File No. 33-55252) of our report dated February 9, 1999, on our audits of the
financial statements and financial statement schedule of the Company as of
December 31, 1998 and December 31, 1997, and for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 1998, which report is included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
March 29, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          98,137
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          30,572
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                45,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    669,772
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         542,312
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           537,502
<LOANS>                                      2,830,073
<ALLOWANCE>                                     35,965
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,357,170
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,337,055
<SHORT-TERM>                                   366,854
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             70,761
<LONG-TERM>                                    194,390
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           256
<OTHER-SE>                                     387,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               4,357,170
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                229,639
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               11,493
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                55,124
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               296,256
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             139,433
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             171,510
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          124,746
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,750
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 969
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                117,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,683
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      26,257
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,257
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.09
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.07
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,836
<LOANS-PAST>                                     5,699
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 61,420
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                38,619
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,113
<RECOVERIES>                                       709
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               35,965
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            35,965
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                EXHIBIT 24.2
 
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

        Norman B. Leventhal does hereby constitute and appoint David L. Stivers
and William L. Perocchi, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with
full power of substitution, whether acting individually or together, to sign 
the Doubletree Corporation and Red Lion Inns Limited Partnership Form 10-K 
Annual Reports for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and any amendments thereto, 
on his behalf, and to file the same, with any exhibits thereto and other 
documents in connection therewith, granting to each of such attorneys-in-fact 
and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act 
requisite and necessary in connection with such matters and hereby ratifying 
and confirming all that each of such attorneys-in-fact and agents or his or her
substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

        Such Power of Attorney shall remain in effect until it is revoked in 
writing by the undersigned.


                                         /s/ Norman B. Leventhal
                                        -------------------------
                                           Norman B. Leventhal
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








The
      undersigned, David Gorodyansky, the Chief Financial Officer of INTELLIGENT
      BUYING. INC. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.
      The
      Company's Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
      (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 10th day
      of
      November 2008.





*/s/
                David Gorodyansky*David
                GorodyanskyPrincipal
                Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Intelligent Buying, Inc. and will be retained by Intelligent Buying, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Erik Holman, Appellant.

[826 NYS2d 287]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered May 13, 2004, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress his oral and written statements to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant made a timely motion to withdraw his plea of guilty to depraved indifference murder *(see*Penal Law § 125.25 [2]), pursuant to CPL 220.60 (3). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, however, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion on the ground that the plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered in the presence of the defendant’s counsel *(see People v Palmer,*29 AD3d 606 [2006]; *People v Molloy,*28 AD3d 681 [2006]; *People v Rodriguez,*17 AD3d 267, 268 [2005]; *People v Colon,*114 AD2d 967 [1985]). The plea contained an unrestricted waiver of all possible appellate claims, including the right to challenge the court’s decision on his suppression motion *(see People v Burke,*25 AD3d 722 [2006]). Thus, the defendant’s challenge to the County Court’s suppression determination is barred.

With respect to the factual sufficiency of the defendant’s plea allocution, the County Court made an inquiry sufficient to conclude that the defendant meant to plead guilty to depraved indifference murder *(see*Penal Law § 125.25 [2]). Because the court inquired further to ensure that the plea was knowing and voluntary, and the defendant did not complain about the court’s remedial action, the defendant “has waived any further challenge to the allocution, and thus no issue is preserved for our *816review” *(see People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 668 [1988]). Miller, J.E, Ritter, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Scout Acquisition, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott Baily, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Scott BailyScott
      BailyPrincipal
      Executive OfficerMay  13,
      2009
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131165 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan KENNETH L. HENRY, Petitioner-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131165 COA: 265747 Ingham CC: 04-001684-AA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the April 3, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             535
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                        32
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,919
<PP&E>                                           7,565
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,408
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,011
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              860
<BONDS>                                         21,912
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            74
<OTHER-SE>                                    (10,256)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,011
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,697
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,294
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    34
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,331
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (291)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        72
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (363)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,333)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,696)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.64)





</TABLE>