alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MultiCell Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended November 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, W. Gerald Newmin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated

March 3, 2006By:

/s/ W. Gerald NewminName:

W. Gerald NewminTitle:

Chief Executive Officer
#### Mike Rieger et al., Respondents, v 303 East 37 Owners Corp., Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[852 NYS2d 768]

Plaintiff was injured when he fell from defendant’s unsecured ladder while working at defendant’s premises. As it is undisputed that the ladder buckled and tipped over to one side, propelling plaintiff to the concrete floor below, the motion court properly granted summary judgment to plaintiff on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1) *(see Montalvo v J. Petrocelli Constr., Inc.,*8 AD3d 173, 175 [2004]; *see also Orellano v 29 E. 37th St. Realty Corp.,*292 AD2d 289, 290-291 [2002]).

The evidence fails to support defendant’s contention that *348plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his injuries (see *Hart v Turner Constr. Co.,*30 AD3d 213 [2006]; *Orellano*at 291). Concur—Lippman, P.J., Andrias, Williams and McGuire, JJ. [See 2007 NY Slip Op 31618(11).]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,010
<SECURITIES>                                   696,283
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               701,582
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 701,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,560
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     631,022
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   701,582
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (182,253)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (61,870)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (244,123)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (244,123)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (23.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (23.51)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000833054
<NAME> GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II-C
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         348,041
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  282,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               630,615
<PP&E>                                      10,126,094
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,288,156
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,633,506
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,424
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,519,934
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,633,506
<SALES>                                        942,166
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,038,285
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  547,515
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                490,770
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            490,770
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   490,770
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1
Independent Accountants' Awareness Letter
================================================================================

August 7, 2000

BankFirst Corporation
625 Market Street
Knoxville, Tennessee  37902

We have reviewed,  in accordance  with standards  established by the AICPA,  the
unaudited interim financial information of BankFirst Corporation (the "Company")
as of June 30, 2000 and for the quarter and year-to-date  periods ended June 30,
2000 and 1999 as indicated  in our report  dated August 7, 2000.  Because we did
not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our  report  referred  to above,  which was  included  in your
quarterly  report on Form 10-Q, is being  incorporated  by reference in the Form
S-8 Registration Statement.

We also are aware that our report referred to above, under Rule 436(c) under the
Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the  registration  statement
prepared or certified by an accountant  or a report  prepared or certified by an
accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                                   Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00034-CR

WILLIAM KYLE ANDERSON

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

40th District Court of Ellis County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 38,768CR

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 2, 2017
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than July 13, 2009. 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland**                     (Nadine Wallman, Vice President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:                

*1. The Hillyer Family Control Group and related controlling interests, which consist of Hudson Hillyer, Hudson Hillyer Trust ( Hudson Hillyer Trustee), Marie Hillyer Trust, ( Hudson Hillyer Trustee), Carole Hillyer, Majorie Shelley, David Shelley, Blair Hillyer, Brad Hillyer, Beth Hillyer, Rebecca Hillyer, Brett Hillyer, Aaron Hillyer, Alec Hillyer, Katherine Hillyer, Jacob Hillyer, and The Clay City Pipe Company, The Bowerston Shale Company, and Fab Ohio;*                     to acquire shares of FNB, Inc., Dennison, Ohio, and thereby acquire shares of First National Bank, Dennison, Ohio.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 22, 2009.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E9-15006 Filed 6-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 31 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 31

                To correct the enrollment of H.R. 1268.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2005

Mrs. Hutchison submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
                To correct the enrollment of H.R. 1268.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in the enrollment of H.R. 1268, an Act making emergency 
supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2005, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representatives 
is hereby authorized and directed to correct section 502 of title V of 
division B so that clause (ii) of section 106(d)(2)(B) of the American 
Competitiveness in the Twenty-first Century Act of 2000 (Public Law 
106-313; 8 U.S.C. 1153 note), as amended by such section 502, reads as 
follows:
                    ``(ii) Maximum.--The total number of visas made 
                available under paragraph (1) from unused visas from 
                the fiscal years 2001 through 2004 may not exceed 
                50,000.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofBuckeye GP Holdings L.P. (“BGH”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I,Forrest E. Wylie, Chief Executive Officer ofMainLine Management LLC, the general partner of BGH, hereby certify, to myknowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of BGH.

 

 
|                     | MAINLINE  MANAGEMENT LLC, as general partner of BGH |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                                |
| Date:  May 12, 2008 | /s/ FORREST E.  WYLIE                               |
|                     | Forrest E. Wylie                                    |
|                     | *Chief  Executive Officer*                          |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jaime Quinones, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 62]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J., on suppression motion; Richard Carruthers, J, at plea, sentencing and resentencing), rendered July 30, 2008, as amended February 29, 2012, convicting defendant of attempted robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 16 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied that portion of appellant’s suppression motion that sought a hearing under *Dunaway v New York*(442 US 200 [1979]) concerning the legality of the arrest that resulted in defendant’s confession. The information provided to defendant explained how he came to be arrested for a robbery. *412In his suppression motion, defendant made only a vague challenge to the stated factual predicate for his arrest, and he did not assert any basis for suppression, or raise a factual dispute requiring a hearing *(see People v Jones,*95 NY2d 721, 728-729 [2001]). To the extent that, on appeal, defendant asserts a ground for suppression, that is an issue that should have been raised in his moving papers.

In adjudicating defendant a persistent violent felony offender, the court properly relied upon an otherwise qualifying 1991 conviction for which no plea or sentencing minutes are available. Defendant failed to overcome the presumption of regularity regarding his prior conviction, or provide any reason to believe that he would have been able to meet his burden of establishing that the prior conviction had been unconstitutionally obtained *(see*CPL 400.21 [7] [b]). “The presumption of regularity is particularly significant in guilty plea cases, because plea situations are ordinarily marked by the absence of controverted issues, and in the plea situation the defendant tacitly indicates that no further judicial inquiry is required” *(People v Hofler, 2*AD3d 176, 176 [1st Dept 2003] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], *affd*4 NY3d 41 [2004]). There is no merit to defendant’s constitutional claims, including his assertion that governmental fault contributed to the unavailability of the minutes. Concur — Tom, J.P, Saxe, De-Grasse, Richter and Clark, JJ.
Order entered July 16, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00469-CV

TERVITA, LLC, Appellant

V.

CASEY SUTTERFIELD, Appellee

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-13815

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s July 13, 2015 unopposed motion for extension of time to file 

reply brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than July 20, 2015.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
An unpublisHed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MARILYN P. SQUIRES, : No. 66120
Appellant,
vs. ry
CENTRAL MORTGAGE COMPANY, F i L E
Respondent. _| JUL 17 2015

TRACIE K. LINDEMAN
CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

Y. :
. DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER

This is a certified question pursuant to NRAP 5 from the

United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Nevada. Pursuant to the

stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, the certification is
withdrawn and this matter is dismissed.

It is so ORDERED.

Ae ace, Cu.

ce: Reno Law Group, LLC
Ace C. Van Patten
Eddie R. Jimenez
Clerk, United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Nevada

‘SUPREME COURT
oF
Nevana

(0) 19478 BO

“21707
rr
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  ONLINE  ORIGINALS,  INC.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  February 29, 2008, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Gaye Adams,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:    April 11, 2008


By:      /s/ Gaye Adams
         --------------
         Gaye Adams
         Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer
FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/14/2015 8:56:13 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
1 The Honorable Warren K. Urbom, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-1341

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District Marcus L. Hitz, * of Nebraska. * Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________ Submitted: January 30, 2001 Filed: February 2, 2001

___________ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Marcus L. Hitz pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. The district court 1 sentenced him to 168 months imprisonment

and five years supervised release. On appeal, Mr. Hitz challenges the court’s application of a two-level enhancement for possessing a firearm in connection with the offense, see U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1), and a three-level enhancement for being-2-

a manager or supervisor of the criminal activity that involved five or more participants, see U.S.S.G. § 3B.1.1(b).
We conclude the district court did not clearly err in determining Mr. Hitz possessed a firearm in connection with the offense, given the testimony at sentencing that he provided a gun as payment for drugs. See UnitedStates v. Womack , 191 F.3d 879, 885 (8th Cir. 1999); UnitedStates v. Newton , 184 F.3d 955, 957-58 (8th Cir. 1999). Likewise, we conclude the court did not clearly err in applying the aggravatingrole enhancement, given the testimony at sentencing that Mr. Hitz regularly had people drive him around during his drug transactions, that he provided for his drivers’ living expenses and gave them drugs without charging, that he provided money to others to rent hotel rooms where drug deals occurred, and that he directed one of his drivers to hold some drugs because police officers were near. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1, comment. (nn.1-2); UnitedStates v. Hyatt, 207 F.3d 1036, 1038 (8th Cir. 2000); UnitedStates v. Johnson , 47 F.3d 272, 277 (8th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
@article{113701,
  author = {Joseph Stroscio and Francesca Tavazza and Jason Crain and Robert Celotta and Anne Chaka},
  title = {Electronically Induced Atom Motion in Engineered CoCu Nanostructures},
  year = {2006},
  number = {313},
  month = {2006-08-18},
  publisher = {Science},
  language = {en},
}
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

GREGORY DENNIS JACKSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3164

[August 8, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Michael C. Heisey, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 472013CF000017CFA.

Gregory Dennis Jackson, Jr., Punta Gorda, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J. 

Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  8973
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   609
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   7389
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               7389
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      7389
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   100.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   100.35
        

</TABLE>