alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kevin Hogge, Chief Financial Officer of CRC Health Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 16, 2009                                       
|                                                              
|/S/    KEVIN
HOGGE                                            
|Kevin Hogge                                                   
|Chief Financial Officer                                       
|(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CRC Health Corporation and will be retained by CRC Health Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Barry Streit, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 474]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), imposed March 3, 2005, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion. Florio, J.E, Ritter, Luciano and Covello, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0000811078
<NAME>                              SHEARSON SELECT ADVISORS FUTURES FUND

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                   6,178,150
<SECURITIES>                                               306,078
<RECEIVABLES>                                               19,321
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         6,503,549
<PP&E>                                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           6,503,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      273,708
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                               6,229,841
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             6,503,549
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         1,108,382
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           384,774
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            723,608
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                               723,608
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  311.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0


</TABLE>
Consent of
Independent Registered Public Account




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8
(No. 333-85206), (No. 33-32095), (No. 33-58538),
(No. 33-32096), (No. 33-87976) and (No. 333-135452) of Northeast
Bancorp of our report dated August 11, 2006, relating to our audit of the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2006 of
Northeast Bancorp and Subsidiaries, which appears in the Annual Report on Form
10-K of Northeast Bancorp and Subsidiaries for the year ended June 30,
2008.
 
 
 
 /s/ Baker Newman &
      NoyesPortland,
      Maine
              Limited
      Liability CompanySeptember
      26, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 67 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 67

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 23, 2019.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Homeland Security: Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. Langevin, Mr. Richmond, 
Mr. Payne, Miss Rice of New York, Mr. Correa, Ms. Torres Small of New Mexico, 
Mr. Rose of New York, Ms. Underwood, Ms. Slotkin, Mr. Cleaver, Mr. Green of 
Texas, Ms. Clarke of New York, Ms. Titus, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Ms. Barragan, and 
Mrs. Demings.
    Committee on Oversight and Reform: Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Ms. 
Norton, Mr. Clay, Mr. Lynch, Mr. Cooper, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Mr. 
Raskin, Mr. Rouda, Ms. Hill of California, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Mr. Sarbanes, 
Mr. Welch, Ms. Speier, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Mr. DeSaulnier, Mrs. Lawrence, Ms. 
Plaskett, Mr. Khanna, Mr. Gomez, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Ms. Pressley, and Ms. Tlaib.
    Committee on Science, Space, and Technology: Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Lipinski, Ms. 
Bonamici, Mr. Bera, Mr. Lamb, Mrs. Fletcher, Ms. Stevens, Ms. Kendra S. Horn of 
Oklahoma, Ms. Sherrill, Mr. Sherman, Mr. McNerney, Mr. Perlmutter, Mr. Tonko, 
Mr. Foster, Mr. Beyer, Mr. Crist, Mr. Casten of Illinois, Ms. Hill of 
California, Mr. McAdams, and Ms. Wexton.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### DAVIS v. OBERLE-JORDRE CO.

Civ. No. 1029.

United States District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

May 16, 1949.

Landis, Ferguson, Bieser & Greer, Dayton, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Curtner & Brenton, Dayton, Ohio, for •defendant.

NEVIN, Chief Judge.

On March 30, 1949, defendant herein •filed a motion wherein it moves this Court to make The Aetna Casualty *&*Surety ■Company an involuntary plaintiff in this .action. At the same time there was filed ■with the motion and in support thereof, the affidavit of Clifford R. Curtner, counsel ■of record for defendant. From these documents it appears that while The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company is a corporation of the State of Connecticut, it is, nevertheless, licensed to do business in Ohio and has a principal business office in the City of Dayton, Ohio, within the jurisdiction of this Court.

The cause is now before the court on defendant’s motion and the affidavit referred to.

Defendant sets forth in its motion the reasons upon which it is based and on account of which it submits the motion should 'be sustained. There is set forth in the motion and in the accompanying affidavit certain information with respect to plaintiff’s decedent and his employment; information regarding an order entered on February 28, 1948 by the Director of Workmen’s Compensation for the State of Wisconsin against decedent’s employer and The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company and regarding the demand of that company upon defendant herein that “its (The Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.,) rights be protected” in this action.

The motion came on for hearing before the court at the -call of the Motion Docket on May 2, 1949. At the hearing in Court at that time, counsel representing both the plaintiff and defendant were present. At that hearing no denial was made by counsel for plaintiff as to any of the statements set forth either in the motion of defendant or the accompanying affidavit. No counter-affidavit has been filed.

The Court is of the opinion and so finds that defendant’s motion is well taken and that it should be, and it is, sustained. Rule 19, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.; Slauson v. Standard Oil Co., et al., D.C., 29 F.Supp. 497.

Counsel may prepare and submit an order making The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company an involuntary plaintiff in this action.
S05A0391.

#### KAPPELMEIER v. IANNAZZONE.

(610 SE2d 60)

Thompson, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a petition for a writ of mandamus. Finding no error, we affirm.

Respondent, Judge Joseph C. Iannazzone, presided over a dispossessory proceeding which Household Realty Corporation brought against petitioner, Gottfried A. Kappelmeier, in the State Court of Gwinnett County. The judge ruled against Kappelmeier, granting Household Realty’s motion for summary judgment. The Court of Appeals affirmed. *Kappelmeier v. Household Realty Corp.,*265 Ga. App. 564 (595 SE2d 81) (2004). Thereafter, Kappelmeier sought a writ of possession against Household Realty. Judge Iannazzone, who was also assigned to sit on that case, granted Household Realty’s motion to dismiss. In the meantime, Kappelmeier filed numerous motions, including motions to recuse Judge Iannazzone, all of which were denied.

Kappelmeier then filed this mandamus action against Judge Iannazzone, seeking an order directing the judge to recuse himself, and to vacate orders which the judge had entered, in the Household Realty cases. The superior court refused to grant a mandamus nisi and dismissed Kappelmeier’s petition. This appeal followed.

1. A direct appeal lies from the refusal of the superior court to grant a mandamus nisi. OCGA § 9-6-28.

2. The superior court did not err in refusing to grant a mandamus nisi and dismissing the petition. Where, as here, “there is a right of judicial review of the act of a judicial officer, mandamus is not an available remedy to require him to perform his judicial function in a *132manner different from the way he has performed it. [Cits.]” *Rossi v. Price,*237 Ga. 651, 652 (229 SE2d 429) (1976).

Decided March 7, 2005

Reconsideration denied March 28, 2005.

Gottfried A. Kappelmeier, *pro se.*

*Karen G. Thomas, Melinda K. Wells, Kristina H. Blum, Theresa A. Cox,*for appellee.

3. It was not incumbent upon the superior court to render findings of fact and conclusions of law in dismissing the petition for mandamus. See *Walker v. Walker,*238 Ga. 273 (232 SE2d 554) (1977) (findings and conclusions are unnecessary in deciding motions to dismiss, summary judgment, or other motions except as provided in OCGA § 9-11-41 (b)); OCGA § 9-11-52 (a) (upon request of party, courts shall make findings and conclusions in ruling on interlocutory injunctions and nonjury trials).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William H. Shea, Jr.,Chief Executive Officer of MainLine Management LLC, the general partner of thePartnership, hereby certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                           |     | MAINLINE MANAGEMENT LLC, as general partner of the  Partnership |
|---------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |     |                                                            |
| Date: September  15, 2006 |     | /s/ WILLIAM H. SHEA, JR.                                        |   |
|                      |     | William H. Shea, Jr.                                            |
|                      | * * | *Chief Executive Officer*                                       |

 

----
---

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul Mann, Principal Accounting officer of Quartz Mountain
Resources Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)          
The Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended July 31,
2010 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)          
The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | By:    | */s/ P. Mann*               
| | ------ | ----------------------------
| |        |                             
| | Name:  | Paul Mann                   
| |        |                             
| | Title: | Principal Accounting Officer
| |        |                             
| | Date:  | September 30, 2010          



This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LILM, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 200**8**, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George I. Norman, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.            Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ | **GEORGEI.NORMAN,III** |
|-----|------------------------|

 

**George I. Norman, III**

Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2008

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or            its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

EMERSON RICHBURG,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 144 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
EX-10.3






EXHIBIT 10.3



FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE




THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (THE “FIRST AMENDMENT”) DATED JULY 31, 2013, SHALL AMEND THE PROMISSORY
NOTE (THE “NOTE”) DATED AS OF MAY 30, 2012 AMONG NON-INVASIVE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. (THE
“MAKER”) AND HSU GAMMA INVESTMENTS TRUST, L.P. (THE “PAYEE”) AS NOTED BELOW.



RECITALS




WHEREAS, Maker and Payee (collectively, the “Parties”) are parties to the Note which became
effective on May 30, 2012; and



WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Note to extend the Maturity Date from September 12,
2014 until July 31, 2015.



NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in the Note and
this First Amendment and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:



AMENDMENT





	 	1.	 	Section 1 of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as
follows:






The principal amount of the loan evidenced hereby, together with any accrued and
unpaid interest, and any and all unpaid costs, fees and expenses accrued, shall be
due and payable on July 31, 2015 (the “Maturity Date”).



2. Governing Law. This First Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida
without regard to its conflict of laws rules or principles.



3. Amendments. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Note shall remain unmodified and in
full force and effect.



4. Entire Agreement. This First Amendment and the Note constitute the entire agreement of the
Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior understandings and
writings between the Parties relating thereto.



5. Interpretation. Any capitalized terms used in this First Amendment but not otherwise
defined shall have the meaning provided in the Note.



6. Counterparts. This First Amendment may be executed manually, electronically in Adobe® PDF
file format, or by facsimile by the Parties, in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be
considered one and the same amendment and shall become effective when a counterpart hereof shall
have been signed by each of the Parties and delivered to the other Party.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower has duly executed this First Amendment to the Note and Security
Note as of the 31st day of July, 2013.



	 	 	 
	 	 	NON-INVASIVE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC.
	
 
	 	By: /s/ James J. Martin
	
 
	 	 
	
 
	 	Name: James J. Martin

Title: Chief Financial Officer
	Agreed and Accepted:

	 	

	HSU GAMMA INVESTMENTS, L.P.

	 	

	By: /s/ Jane H. Hsiao

	 	

	 

	 	

	Name: Jane H. Hsiao, Ph.D.

Title: General Partner
#### MCS MANAGEMENT, INC., PlaintiffAppellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-5049.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 7, 2001.

*958Before SCHALL, Circuit Judge, ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

*Judgment*

PER CURIAM.

*This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:*

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit 12(a)

CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

12 Months EndedDecember
2008

December
2007

December
2006

December
2005

December
2004(In millions)(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations (Before Extraordinary Loss and Cumulative Effects of Changes in Accounting Principles)

$
(1,314.4
)
$
822.4

$
748.6

$
535.9

$
498.4Taxes on Income, Including Tax Effect for BGE Preference Stock Dividends


(83.6
)

419.2


343.1


155.4


110.2Adjusted Income

$
(1,398.0
)
$
1,241.6

$
1,091.7

$
691.3

$
608.6Fixed Charges:Interest and Amortization of Debt Discount and Expense and Premium on all Indebtedness, net of amounts capitalized

$
350.5

$
292.8

$
315.9

$
297.6

$
315.9Earnings Required for BGE Preference Stock Dividends


23.9


22.3


21.1


21.6


21.4Capitalized Interest and Allowance for Funds Used During Construction


50.0


19.4


13.7


9.9


9.7Interest Factor in Rentals


96.5


96.7


4.5


6.1


4.1Total Fixed Charges

$
520.9

$
431.2

$
355.2

$
335.2

$
351.1Amortization of Capitalized Interest

$
3.3

$
3.5

$
4.3

$
3.7

$
2.8(Loss) Earnings (1)

$
(923.8
)
$
1,656.9

$
1,437.5

$
1,020.3

$
952.8Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


N/A


3.84


4.05


3.04


2.71


---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Selbin Martinez, Appellant.

Submitted March 18, 2013;

decided March 21, 2013

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Richard M. Greenberg, Esq., Office of the Appellate Defender, 11 Park Place, Suite 1601, New York, NY 10007 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas Neal Roberts, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of ITonis Inc., (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for
      the quarter ended August 31, 2007 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                





| | By:    | /s/
      Thomas Neal Roberts
| | ------ | -----------------------------
| |        |                              
| | Name:  | Thomas Neal Roberts          
| |        |                              
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and  
| |        | Chief Financial Officer      
| |        |                              
| | Date:  | October 18, 2007             

---