alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.5

Agreement Between Enfacet and the Company, dated August 24, 2001

                                 August 24, 2001

Vasu Vijayaraghavan, President
ENFACET, INC.
1524 S. IH 35, Suite 312
Austin, TX 78704

      Re:   Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. Stock Purchase

Dear Vasu:

      This letter will confirm that with respect to Vertical Computer Systems,
Inc.'s ("Vertical") purchase of one hundred percent (100%) of the outstanding
and issued stock of Enfacet, Inc. ("Enfacet"), pursuant to that certain Stock
Purchase Agreement, by and between Vertical and Enfacet, dated as of August 21,
2001 (the "SPA"), we have agreed to the following additional terms:

      1.    Vertical shall transfer to Enfacet by Monday, August 24, 2001, the
            sum of FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS (US $5,000.00) for its short term cash
            flow needs;

      2.    Next week, after Vertical has received its anticipated interim
            financing, Vertical will transfer to Enfacet an additional
            TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS (US $25,000.00) for its short term cash
            flow needs;

      3.    On or after August 20, 2002 (the "Anniversary Date"), Enfacet shall
            distribute one-half of the 30,000 shares Vertical Preferred Series C
            Stock, received in consideration of the execution of the SPA, to
            those Enfacet employees employed by Enfacet on the Anniversary Date
            ("Initial Employees")who were employed continuously by Enfacet from
            the date of execution of the SPA to and through the Anniversary
            Date; the remaining 15,000 shares of Vertical Preferred Series C
            Stock will be used for additional funding or similar purposes, at a
            later date, by EnFacet's current management.

      4.    Vertical shall issue to the Initial Employees employed with Enfacet
            after Ninety days from the execution of the SPA options or warrants
            for the total of FIVE MILLION (5,000,000) shares of Vertical's
            common stock, at (current market price as on 8/24/01) of $0.0250
            (the "Options"). A portion of these shares shall be in the form of
            registered/free trading shares. These shall be covered under the


                                       45
<PAGE>

            standard Vertical leak-out agreement. The Options shall be
            distributed to such eligible Initial Employees in accordance with a
            plan submitted by you and approved by Vertical.

      The SPA shall not otherwise be modified. By executing a copy of this
letter, you hereby indicated you acknowledged and agreement to the terms
outlined herein.

                                            Sincerely,

                                            VERTICAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.


                                            By: ___________________________
                                                Richard Wade, President

ACKNOWLEDGED, ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

ENFACET, INC.


By: ______________________________
    Vasu Vijayaraghavan, President


                                       46
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Russell A. Olson, Chief Financial Officer of Intcomex, Inc. (the Company), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 14, 2008



/s/ Russell A. OlsonRussell A. OlsonChief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mohammed Khan, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 387]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Analisa Torres, J.), rendered August 1, 2011, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of sexual abuse in the first degree, forcible touching and endangering the welfare of a child, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of three years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant did not preserve his contention that the court’s jury instructions were deficient because they did not inform the jury that the People were required to prove the specific conduct alleged in the indictment. This is a claim requiring preservation *508
      *(see People v Whitecloud,*110 AD3d 626 [1st Dept 2013]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find no basis for reversal *(see People v Grega,*72 NY2d 489, 496 [1988]). The court’s instructions included all the elements of the crimes charged. Given the trial evidence, there is no reasonable possibility that the jury convicted defendant on any factual theory other than the one alleged in the indictment. Defendant’s arguments to the contrary are based on speculation.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Friedman, J.E, Acosta, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 650 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 650

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      October 23, 2019.
    Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 4617) to amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to clarify 
the obligation to report acts of foreign election influence and require 
implementation of compliance and reporting systems by Federal campaigns to 
detect and report such acts, and for other purposes. The first reading of the 
bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 
bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 
exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on House Administration. After general debate the bill 
shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. In lieu of the 
amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on House 
Administration now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an 
original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule an 
amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules 
Committee Print 116-35 modified by the amendment printed in part A of the report 
of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. That amendment in the 
nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order against 
that amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. No amendment to that 
amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed 
in part B of the report of the Committee on Rules. Each such amendment may be 
offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member 
designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 
the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent 
and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to 
a demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the 
Whole. All points of order against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion 
of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 
the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member 
may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the 
Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of a 
substitute made in order as original text. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
To:

RE.

July 13, 20168 $3,970 -01

Abel Reosta , Clerk in the;
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
P.O. Box 12308 - Capitol Station
Austin , Texas 787)! RECEIVED IN
- COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Correspondence Courtesy 5 WR-83,372-01 jy 162018

Cc
Dear Mr. Acosta, Apel Acosta, Glerk

Sic, If ot all possible, could you, would you please
see to it that each ancl every member of the Court of

Criminal Appeals of Texas receive his or her own
individual copy of the enclosed correspondence... Your

cooperation in this matter will be greatly appreciated...

With Great Gratitude Me. Doxay Wye Ning

RSVP Mr. Terry Wayne Kin g * 1610572

Coffield Unit - 2bb1 FM 2054
Tennessee Colony , Tx. T5884



To.

RE.

duly 13, 2015

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
P.0. Box 12308 3 Capitol Station
Austin , Texas 787

Justice or Legal Technicalities 5 WR-83,372-0l

To The Honorable Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas:
Now comes LT, The Petitioner, and makes this earnest plea
Sor Justice ... Actual Innocence does exsist within this
Cause, however, LT cannot obtain Supporting documentation
From the confines of -Prigon...

hegal Technicalities and Justice are Not one and the same...
Tustice demands swift action, while technicalities allows
the Court to drag ibs legal feet... Legal technicalities

can distort or even deny justice... I believe that there
are some technical ruling set in place in order to deny
Justice and still remain legal... As in my cose, I was
denied equal protection and constitutional fundamental
Fairness , yet to this day the conviction still stands ,
almost Syrs. of weengful inearcecation... L Pray that there
are enough of you who will seek Justice First in this cose.

RSVP Jerry Wayne King “/6/0572

Coffield Unit - 2661 FM 2054
Tennessee Colony, Tx. 715 884

.

P10oF1
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b)
AND 15d-14(b)


(Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Neuralstem, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, I. Richard Garr,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the
      Company.





/s/I. Richard
      GarrChief
      Executive Officer
                  Neuralstem,
      Inc





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gunther J. Flinn, Appellant.

Submitted January 14, 2013;

decided February 7, 2013

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Martin P McCarthy II, Esq., care of Muldoon & Getz, Esqs., 144 Exchange Boulevard, Suite 402, Rochester, New York 14614 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Porter
Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Maria L. Bouvette, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                      |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                         |  | PORTER BANCORP, INC.
|                         |  |                     
|Dated: November 13, 2007 |  | By:                  |  | /s/ Maria L. Bouvette  
|                         |  |                      |  | Maria L. Bouvette      
|                         |  |                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of STW Resources Holdings
Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Stanley Weiner, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





November
      22, 2010/s/
      Stanley WeinerStanley
      WeinerChief
      Executive Officer
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   12-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1995
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1995
[CASH]                                      $1,160,463
[SECURITIES]                                        $0
[RECEIVABLES]                              $22,152,552
[ALLOWANCES]                                ($397,211)
[INVENTORY]                                         $0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                           $44,117,192
[PP&E]                                     $56,810,219
[DEPRECIATION]                           ($19,217,558)
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                             $93,628,550
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                      $32,568,873
[BONDS]                                             $0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                               $0
[PREFERRED]                                         $0
[COMMON]                                        $4,447
[OTHER-SE]                                 $26,376,989
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]               $93,628,550
[SALES]                                   $111,346,075
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                          $111,346,075
[CGS]                                      $93,855,681
[TOTAL-COSTS]                              $93,855,681
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                           $13,239,441
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                    $0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                          $1,417,802
[INCOME-PRETAX]                             $2,833,151
[INCOME-TAX]                                $1,490,568
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                         $1,342,583
[DISCONTINUED]                                      $0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                     $0
[CHANGES]                                           $0
[NET-INCOME]                                $1,342,583
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                     $.30
[EPS-DILUTED]                                     $.29
</TABLE>
@conference{1214091,
  author = {Shanee Dawkins and Jody Jacobs},
  title = {Phishing for User Context: Understanding the NIST Phish Scale},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-08-23 04:08:00},
  publisher = {Federal Information Security Educators (FISSEA) Summer Virtual Forum 2023, Gaithersburg, MD, US},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=956439},
  language = {en},
}
FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/14/2015 9:14:51 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Bank of Granite Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kirby
A. Tyndall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
Company.

Date: March 14, 2005                   /s/ Kirby A. Tyndall
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Kirby A. Tyndall
                                       Secretary, Treasurer and
                                       Chief Financial Officer
The State 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 2, 2014

No. 04-14-00103-CR

Melvin MARTIN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR3537

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The State’s brief was originally due to be filed with this court on July 28, 2014. We 

granted the State’s first motion for an extension of time to file the brief until August 27, 2014. 

On August 29, 2014, the State filed its second motion for extension of time to file its brief. It 

requested a thirty-day extension for a total extension of sixty days. 

The State’s motion is GRANTED. The State’s brief must be filed with this court not 

later than September 26, 2014. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE STATE’S BRIEF WILL BE GRANTED.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of September, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5311-N-03]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        On June 9, 2009, HUD published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         (74 FR 27340) to announce that a revised version of the Capital Fund Recovery Competition (CFRC) NOFA had been issued and posted to the HUD website. That brief notice stated that the deadline date for Category 4 (Creation of Energy Efficient, Green Communities) applications is July 29, 2009. In fact, the correct deadline date for Category 4 applications is July 21, 2009. The July 21, 2009 deadline date for Category 4 applications is correctly stated in the revised CFRC NOFA posted on HUD's Web site on June 3, 2009. While the requirements for submitting an application for this assistance are those provided in the CFRC NOFA, HUD is using today's                         **Federal Register**                         notice to avoid any confusion in its applicant community.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        If you have a question or need a clarification, you may contact the Office of Capital Improvements by sending an email message to                         *PIHOCI@hud.gov*. Please see                         *http://www.hud.gov/​offices/​pih/​programs/​ph/​capfund/​ocir.cfm*, which can be accessed from                         *http://www.hud.gov/​recovery/​*, for the revised CFRC NOFA and additional information.                    

Dated: June 19, 2009.

Aaron Santa Anna,

Assistant General Counsel for Regulations.

[FR Doc. E9-14910 Filed 6-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5210-67-P