alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                                                              Exhibit 27
                                                              ----------


                      CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
                         FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                    ($ In Millions Except Per Share)
       
<CAPTION>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.


<S>                                     <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000,000

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<CASH>                                     58
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                             624
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                               158
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,191
<PP&E>                                  6,408
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          8,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   1,177
<BONDS>                                 1,911
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                              2,929
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            8,387
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        3,668
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           3,213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           381
<INCOME-TAX>                              125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       256
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              256
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0

        
<PAGE>



</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I,  Terri Lyn Harris  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted  pursuant to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the
Annual  Report of  WorldWater  Corp.  on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended
December 31, 2002 fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained
in such Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB fairly  presents in all material  respects
the financial condition and results of operation of WorldWater Corp.


By:    /s/ Terri Lyn Harris
       ----------------------------------
Name:  Terri Lyn Harris
Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  March 28, 2003
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-3347 

_____________________________

TREMAYNE FRAZIER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

James M. Colaw, Judge.

June 19, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WINOKUR, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

David Maldonado, J.D., The Maldonado Law Firm, P.A., Lakeland,

for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Human Genome Research Institute Special Emphasis Panel; RC2 ENCODE & Cellular Perturbation.                    

*Date:*                         July 22, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20817.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Keith McKenney, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, NHGRI, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-594-4280,                         *mckenneyk@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 18, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-15062 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Oscar Starker, Appellant, v Trump Village Section 4, Inc., et al., Defendants, and New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal et al., Respondents.

Submitted May 13, 2013;

decided August 22, 2013

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Manuel Occiano, certifythat:

 

1. I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 10-KSB of RevCare, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisannual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this annualreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”);and

 

c) presented in this annualreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a) all significant deficienciesin the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialdata and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknessesin internal controls; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annualreport whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in otherfactors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to thedate of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Date: January 29, 2004 

 

 
|   | /S/: Manuel  Occiano |                                     |
|--------|----------------------|------------------------------------------|
|   |                 | Manuel  Occiano  Chief Executive Officer |
|        |                      |                                          |  |

 

----
July 16, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NORMA JEAN SANCHEZ, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00780-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
LARRY D. FORD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1D13-5955

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 3, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

James C. Hankinson, Judge.

Larry D. Ford, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, WETHERELL, and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR.
#### DELANEY v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. CO.

Civil Action No. 4196.

District Court, E. D. New York.

Nov. 15, 1945.

*32Stewart & Shearer, of New York City, for defendant, for the motion.

Desmond T. Barry, of New York City, for plaintiff.

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion made by the defendant under Rule 30(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for an order directing that the depositions of the employees of the defendant shall be taken at the place, or places, of residence of the persons to be examined and not at the office of counsel for the plaintiff in New York City, upon the ground that the said employees sought to be examined reside outside of the State of New York and in the States of North Carolina arid South Carolina.

The witnesses sought to be examined are the motormen and firemen in charge of defendant’s trains referred to in the complaint. The line of the defendant extends from the State of Florida northerly to its termini at Norfolk, Virginia, and Richmond, Virginia. On the through run from Miami, Florida, to New York City, New York, the defendant operates its through trains between Jacksonville, Florida, and Richmond, Virginia. The engineers and firemen sought to be examined, perform their duties exclusively in the states of Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina, and reside at points along the line of railroad over which they operate.

It appearing that the employees of the defendant reside in other states and at some distance from New York, there is no requirement under Rule 30 that the defendant produce such witnesses for examination.

Plaintiff’s attorney, in his affidavit, states that he is' willing to examine said witnesses at their places of residence provided the defendant pays the reasonable travelling expenses and reasonable counsel fees for the time consumed in taking the deposition. There is no obligation on the part of the defendant to make any such payment. The examination may be had at the places of residence of the witnesses or at any city in which said witnesses travel in the performance of théir duties for the defendant.

Motion granted as indicated.

Settle order on notice.
#### In the Matter of Peter J. Galasso (Admitted as Peter John Galasso), an Attorney, Appellant. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, Respondent.

Submitted February 4, 2013;

decided February 19, 2013

*1056Motion by The Bronx County Bar Association, insofar as it seeks leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein, granted and the brief is accepted as filed; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein, dismissed as academic.

Judge Rivera taking no part.
RANDALL WYSE, LARRY JONES, 

MARK ROBERTS, LATORRENCE 

NORRIS, FRATERNAL ORDER OF 

POLICE, LODGE 5-30 AND THE 

JACKSONVILLE ASSOCIATION OF 

FIRE FIGHTERS, LOCAL 122, IAFF,

Petitioners,

v.

FRANK DENTON, MAYOR ALVIN 

BROWN, in his official capacity, THE 

City OF JACKSONVILLE, and the 

JACKSONVILLE POLICE AND FIRE 

PENSION FUND BOARD OF 

TRUSTEES,

Respondents.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF 

APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF 

FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES 

TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF 

FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3684

Opinion filed July 15, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Paul A. Donnelly and James H. Sullivan III of Donnelly & Gross, P.A., Gainesville, 

for Petitioners.

George D. Gabel, Jr., Timothy J. Conner, and Jennifer Mansfield, of Holland & 

Knight, LLP, Jacksonville, for Respondent Frank Denton. David J. D’Agata, Assistant 

General Counsel, and Craig D. Feiser, Assistant General Counsel, City of Jacksonville, 

Jacksonville for Respondent City of Jacksonville. Robert D. Klausner, Stuart A. 

Kaufman, and Paul A. Daragjati of Klausner, Kaufman, Jensen, and Levinson, P.A.,

Plantation, for Respondent Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund Board of 

Trustees.
2

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed in part and denied in part. The 

portion challenging the final summary judgment is dismissed as untimely. The portion 

challenging the denial of Petitioners’ motion to void the final summary judgment is 

denied because the trial court correctly ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the 

motion. See First Union Nat’l Bank of Fla. v. Yost, 622 So. 2d 111, 112 (Fla. 1st DCA 

1993).

DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part.

WOLF, BENTON, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

mniteb ~tates ([ourt of §ppeaIs 

for tlJe jf eberaI ([ircuit 

JOSE A. CADIENTE, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 

Respondent . 

• 

2011-3146 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in case no. SF0831100627-I-1. 

ON MOTION 

ORDER 

Upon consideration of Jose A. Cadiente's motion to 

voluntarily withdraw his appeal, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed. 

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs. 
CADIENTE v. OPM 

J\D.. 19 2011 

Date 

cc: Jose A. Cadiente 

Sarah M. Bienkowski, Esq. 

s21 

FOR THE COURT 

lsI Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

2 

Issued As A Mandate: J\D.. 1 9 2011 

U.S. couJ~~~~PEALS FOR 

THE fEDERAL CIRCUIT 

JUb 1 9 2011 

JAN HOR8AlY 

CLERK
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re: Stacey Diane Sartor

No. 06-15-00027-CV

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the relief 

sought. Therefore, we deny the petition.

RENDERED JULY 14, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of IBroadband, Inc., on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Matthew Hutchins, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sections 906 of the Sabanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in al material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IBroadband, Inc.





By/s/ Matthew Hutchins









Chief Financial and Executive Officer

Date:  May 29, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,791]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 14, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Commercial Vehicle Group/Trim Systems, Dublin, Virginia. The workers at the subject facility produce truck interiors.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 20th day of May 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-15295 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   12-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1997
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1997
[CASH]                                      $3,674,027
[SECURITIES]                                        $0
[RECEIVABLES]                              $24,548,823
[ALLOWANCES]                                ($921,301)
[INVENTORY]                                         $0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                           $45,416,543
[PP&E]                                    $100,195,540
[DEPRECIATION]                           ($27,420,533)
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                            $135,015,990
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                      $49,575,484
[BONDS]                                             $0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                               $0
[PREFERRED]                                         $0
[COMMON]                                        $4,447
[OTHER-SE]                                  $9,388,929
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]              $135,015,990
[SALES]                                   $135,311,067
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                          $135,311,067
[CGS]                                     $125,186,710
[TOTAL-COSTS]                             $125,186,710
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                           $15,375,453
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                    $0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                          $4,435,853
[INCOME-PRETAX]                           ($9,686,949)
[INCOME-TAX]                              ($1,168,709)
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                       ($8,518,240)
[DISCONTINUED]                                      $0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                     $0
[CHANGES]                                           $0
[NET-INCOME]                              ($8,518,240)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                  ($1.97)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                  ($1.97)
</TABLE>
Order filed, July 16, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00440-CR

____________

EX PARTE VIDAL ALEXANDER REYES, Appellant

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No 10

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1946698

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due June 12, 2014. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. On June 25, 2014, this court ordered the court reporter to file the record 

within 10 days. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the 

reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Bonnie Rodriguez, the substitute court reporter, to file the record 

in this appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. No further extension will 

be entertained absent exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts 

are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See 
Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Bonnie Rodriguez does not timely file the record as 

ordered, we will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to 

determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
Rubin Crain TZ

WC) Holliday onie# Adc “238 | YY, USO -OF
295 IH-45 North
Huntsville TX 77320-8443
uss Sally shaoy
Rez Wet of Centon Eaaquitey)
15 The deononoble Cleek:

Puadinn to He {4 \ ug ol the WRet of Caebioran
x oR about Supe 3H 20) hue to the 215 quien ol"tt the
Spo8t How % ww Recorclaate-to aval seh Inu, we WI mall

cei €) allows me And opGE Hutttate Pecetue @ copy G
Ac Docket genceecl? N en well AS Echo A)
“ott No! Poe vo tke mocese of Ace Goud?

USk\n A\\ clue Respect. =- BOue ALLCAICE abla
nogeectaled trl hauca Oite, al”

“Respect SulrttHed ; ete CEVED IN

JUL 14 20"

Yi Le @ Abel Acosia Clerk

Rubs Geary 7”

= rf

Ce CofC