IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 710 

Calling on Congress to condemn voter suppression laws enacted by States 

and political subdivisions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2019 

Ms. NORTON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Calling on Congress to condemn voter suppression laws 

enacted by States and political subdivisions. 

Whereas the ratification of the 15th Amendment in 1870 affirms that voting rights cannot be denied to citizens on 

the basis of race; 

Whereas post-Reconstruction Jim Crow laws severely restricted minority voting rights, particularly those of African Americans; 

Whereas the Voting Rights Act of 1965 contributed to a significant increase in voter registration and participation 

by African Americans and other minorities; 

Whereas the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. Holder struck down section 4(b) of the Voting 

Rights Act of 1965, the coverage provision of the law 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 710 IH 

that identified States and political subdivisions with a 

chronic history of passing restrictive voting laws; 

Whereas the Shelby County decision effectively immobilized 

section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which allowed 

the Department of Justice and Federal courts to 

‘‘preclear’’ any proposed changes to voting rules, allowing 

a preemptive strike of unjust and discriminatory voting 

laws in the regions identified by section 4(b); 

Whereas the absence of this preclearance requirement has allowed for voter suppression laws to proliferate by permitting States and political subdivisions to pass restrictive 

voting laws without Federal preclearance to determine if 

the laws are racially discriminatory; 

Whereas following the Shelby County decision, at least 14 

States had voting restrictions in place for the first time 

in a Presidential election in time for the 2016 contest; 

Whereas approximately 11 percent of American citizens lack 

government-issued photo identification, and a disproportionate number are low-income, elderly, or people of 

color; 

Whereas African Americans are as much as 305 percent and 

Latinos are as much as 195 percent more likely than 

Whites to lack acceptable identification required to vote; 

Whereas since the Shelby County decision, at least 4 States 

have reduced early voting access; 

Whereas restricting early voting disproportionately affects 

people of color, low-income citizens, and the elderly, who 

often rely on flexible, early voting periods; 

Whereas many voting-eligible, low-income Latino voters are 

naturalized United States citizens who lack proof of citizenship and cannot afford a Certificate of Citizenship or 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 710 IH 

a Replacement Certificate of Naturalization, which cost 

$1,170 and $555, respectively; 

Whereas since the Shelby County decision, at least 2 States 

have imposed more stringent requirements on nongovernmental organizations that help register and engage citizens in voter participation; 

Whereas restricting nongovernmental voter participation organizations directly affects people of color, low-income 

citizens, and the elderly, as these organizations are particularly likely to reach and engage these populations; 

Whereas since the Shelby County decision, at least 5 States 

have passed laws making it more difficult to vote by absentee ballot; 

Whereas reducing absentee voting disproportionately affects 

low-income, minority voters, who are more likely than 

other citizens to have inflexible work- and childcare-related schedules; 

Whereas in addition to State-level voter suppression laws, political subdivisions have also passed new laws that suppress minority voters, including reducing the number of 

polling places and offering insufficient language assistance for non-English-speaking voters; 

Whereas following the Shelby County decision, there were at 

least 868 fewer polling places in the 2016 election than 

in past elections; 

Whereas insufficient language assistance at polling places 

could possibly threaten eligible Latino voter turnout in 

the 2020 Presidential election; 

Whereas since the Shelby County decision, courts have struck 

down restrictive voting laws in at least 4 States, demVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:30 Nov 19, 2019 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR710.IH HR710

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

•HRES 710 IH 

onstrating the discriminatory nature of voting restrictions 

that have proliferated post-Shelby County; 

Whereas had a preclearance formula been in effect, the Department of Justice and Federal courts would have been 

able to prevent discriminatory voter suppression laws 

from being passed; 

Whereas the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of 

Representatives has favorably reported the Voting Rights 

Advancement Act of 2019 (H.R. 4), to update and restore the Voting Rights Act of 1965; and 

Whereas many unjust voter laws that were passed or went 

into effect after the Shelby County decision threaten to 

affect a significant number of minority voters in upcoming elections: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 demns the use by States and political subdivisions of the 

3 voter suppression laws and techniques described in the 

4 preamble of this resolution. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS