alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Edward P. Mangano et al., Respondents, v Sheldon Silver et al., Defendants, and State of New York et al., Appellants.

Decided October 18, 2012

Appeals, treated as taken from the counter-judgment, transferred, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, to the Appellate Division, Second Department, upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie when questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, §§ 3 [b] [2]; 5 [b]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]).
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 99.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

Board of Directors and Shareholders
Sterling Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Lancaster, Pennsylvania

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION and SUBSIDIARIES as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the
related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999. These
financial statements are the responsibility of management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We did not audit the 1999 and 1998 financial statements of Hanover Bancorp,
Inc., or the 1998 financial statements of Northeast Bancorp, Inc., which
combined statements reflect total assets constituting 32.2% as of December 31,
1999 of the related consolidated financial statement totals, and combined net
interest income constituting 30.1% and 37.6% in 1999 and 1998 respectively, of
the related consolidated financial statement totals for each of the two years in
the period ended December 31, 1999. Those statements were audited by other
auditors whose reports have been furnished to us, and in our opinion, insofar as
it relates to the amounts included for Hanover Bancorp, Inc. and Northeast
Bancorp, Inc. for the respective years noted, is based solely on the reports of
the other auditors.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, the
financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial position of Sterling Financial Corporation and
Subsidiaries at December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the consolidated results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1999, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.

                                              /s/ Trout, Ebersole & Groff, LLP

                                                  Trout, Ebersole & Groff, LLP
                                                  Certified Public Accountants


January 20, 2000 except for Note 26
as to which the date is January 25, 2000
Lancaster, Pennsylvania
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Levavah Harvin, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 455]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Philip M. Grella, J.), rendered on or about December 16, 2003, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making *334application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur—Saxe, J.E, Friedman, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           5,083
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           7,344
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    28
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     17,373
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          29,748
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            29,980
<LOANS>                                        141,486
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 214,615
<DEPOSITS>                                     163,663
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,413
<LONG-TERM>                                     30,157
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,519
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,863
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 214,615
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,340
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,804
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   258
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                16,402
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,652
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,717
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,270
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    (349)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,624
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,974
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,974
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,528
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.00
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.84
<LOANS-NON>                                     12,866
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 11,348
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,641
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,171
<RECOVERIES>                                       511
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,632
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,563
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,064
        

</TABLE>
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 18 - 0391

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JAMES BLAKE CONN,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Kathy Seeley , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Laurie McKinnon Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 3 2020

06/03/2020
Case Number: DA 18-0391
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15084]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Translating Research To Protect Health Through 
Health Promotion, Prevention, and Preparedness, Panel A, Funding 
Opportunity Announcement (FOA) CD09-001, Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 1 p.m.-4 p.m., July 24, 2009 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of ``Translating Research to 
Protect Health through Health Promotion, Prevention, and 
Preparedness, Panel A, FOA CD09-001, initial review.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Shoukat Qari, Ph.D., 
Scientific Review Administrator, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., 
Mailstop D72, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone (404) 639-4663.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: June 18, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-15084 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before July 27, 2009 to be assured of consideration.

## Financial Management Service (FMS)

*OMB Number:*                     1510-0013.                

*Type of Review:*                     Revision.                

*Form:*                     FMS 2208.                

*Title:*                     States Where Licensed for Surety.                

*Description:*                     Information collected from insurance companies provides Federal bond approving officers with a listing of states, by company, in which they are licensed to write Federal bonds. This information appears in the Treasury's Circular 570.                

*Respondents:*                     Businesses or other for-profits.                

*Estimated Total Burden Hours:*                     268 hours.                

*Clearance Officer:*                     Wesley Powe (202) 874-7662. Financial Management Service, Room 135, 3700 East West Highway, Hyattsville, MD 20782.                

*OMB Reviewer:*                     OIRA Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                     *oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.*

Robert Dahl,

Treasury PRA, Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-14998 Filed 6-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-35-P
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orient Paper, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhenyong Liu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.




Date: August 16, 2010
By:
/s/ Zhenyong LiuZhenyong LiuChief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Middle Kingdom Alliance Corp. (the Company) on Form 10Q, for the three
month period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bernard J. Tanenbaum III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Bernard J. Tanenbaum III
|Bernard J. Tanenbaum III    
|Chief Executive Officer     

November 1, 2007
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-17-00171-CR

IN RE EARL KING

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Earl King has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in which he asks this Court to 

order the 202nd Judicial District Court of Bowie County to rule on a “Motion For Dismissal” of 

trial court cause number 13F0063, filed on June 2, 2017. We deny King’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. 

It is King’s burden to properly request and show his entitlement to mandamus relief. See 

Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding) 

(per curiam) (“Even a pro se applicant for a writ of mandamus must show himself entitled to the 

extraordinary relief he seeks.”). With respect to his request, King must show that he has no adequate 

remedy at law to redress his alleged harm and that what he seeks to compel is a ministerial act, not 

involving a discretionary or judicial decision. See State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of 

Appeals at Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (orig. proceeding). 

While the trial court is required to consider all properly filed motions before it, In re Shaw, 175 

S.W.3d 901, 904 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2005, orig. proceeding), a relator seeking a writ of mandamus 

must file with this Court a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to his claim for 

relief (mandamus record). See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k), 52.7(a). 

King did not file a mandamus record in this Court. Consequently, we may not evaluate the 

merits of King’s request for mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7; Barnes, 832 S.W.2d at 426. 
3

We deny King’s petition for writ of mandamus.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: September 14, 2017

Date Decided: September 15, 2017

Do Not Publish
@conference{1212246,
  author = {Xiaoyu Zhang and Xiwei Xuan and Rachael Sexton and Alden A. Dima},
  title = {LabelVizier: Interactive Validation and Relabeling for Technical Text Annotations},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-03-30 04:03:00},
  publisher = {2023 IEEE 16th Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), Seoul, KR},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=934878},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1109/PacificVis56936.2023.00026},
  language = {en},
}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

KRISTIN NEWVINE,

Petitioner

v.

JERSEY SHORE AREA SCHOOL 

DISTRICT,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 662 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### Jeffrey R. Stanton, as Executor of Joyce Harris Stanton, Deceased, Appellant, v Roman Nowygrod, M.D., et al., Respondents.

[822 NYS2d 448]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered January 5, 2006, unanimously withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the stipulation of the parties hereto. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Buckley, EJ., Saxe, Williams, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.
Exhibit 11. Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings

|                                    | Year Ended
  
June 30, 2003 | Year Ended
  
June 30, 2002
|----------------------------------- | --------------------------- | ---------------------------
|EQUIVALENT SHARES:                  |                             |                            
|Weighted average shares outstanding | 2,644,317                   | 2,599,368                  
|                                    |                             |                            
|Total diluted shares                | 2,685,943                   | 2,667,033                  
|                                    |                             |                            
|Net income                          | $  3,855,318                | $  3,852,620               
|                                    |                             |                            
|Basic earnings per share            | $           1.46            | $           1.48           
|                                    |                             |                            
|Diluted earnings per share          | $           1.44            | $           1.44
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          38,377
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              15
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                28,950
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    131,663
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          85,155
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            86,465
<LOANS>                                        567,670
<ALLOWANCE>                                      8,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 915,173
<DEPOSITS>                                     783,297
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             16,095
<LONG-TERM>                                     32,312
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,425
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,043
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 915,173
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 49,186
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               12,598
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                61,784
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              24,936
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,402
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           34,446
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,129
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 215
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 41,120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,125
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      11,156
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,156
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.24
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   4.511
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,314
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,269
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,105
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,259
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,566
<RECOVERIES>                                       320
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                8,142
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             8,142
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,758


</TABLE>