alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                             7,906,335
<SECURITIES>                       000
<RECEIVABLES>                      000
<ALLOWANCES>                       000
<INVENTORY>                        000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   000
<PP&E>                             55,973,759
<DEPRECIATION>                     000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     63,880,094
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              7,020,072
<BONDS>                            60,654,731
<COMMON>                           000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              000
<PREFERRED>                        000
<OTHER-SE>                         (3,010,834)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       63,880,094
<SALES>                            000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   10,176,690
<CGS>                              000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      4,333,633
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   2,076,128
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 4,550,655
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    000
<INCOME-TAX>                       000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                000
<DISCONTINUED>                     (1,177,531)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    000
<CHANGES>                          000
<NET-INCOME>                       (1,940,738)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (.41)
        

</TABLE>
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 530 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the amount of 

the Members’ Representational Allowance should be increased in response 

to increasing threats against Members of the House. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2019 

Mr. GREEN of Texas (for himself and Mr. SCHWEIKERT) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the amount of the Members’ Representational Allowance 

should be increased in response to increasing threats 

against Members of the House. 

Whereas, on January 8, 2011, a gunman opened fire at a 

congressional event in Tucson, Arizona, critically wounding Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and killing a congressional staff member and five members of the public; 

Whereas, on June 14, 2017, a gunman with a rifle and sidearm opened fire on at least seventeen Members of Congress, several staff, United States Capitol Police officers, 

and members of the public in Alexandria, Virginia; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 530 IH 

Whereas, in a hearing on July 16, 2019, Capitol Police Chief 

Steven Sund stated that threats against Members of Congress are increasing at a record pace this Congress; and 

Whereas every Member of the House of Representatives is in 

dire need of additional security in response to these increased threats to themselves, their families, and their 

staff: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the amount of the Members’ Representa3 tional Allowance should be increased by such amount as 

4 is necessary to protect Members of the House (including 

5 the Delegates and Resident Commissioner to the Con6 gress), as well as members of the public who are present 

7 when Members are in public venues, from increasing 

8 threats. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
## 1999 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

10-18-1999 

# Mi s t ick PB T v

. H ou sin g Auth C t y P gh

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al :

D ock e t 97-3248

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_1999

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1999 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" M i s t ick PB T v

. H ousin g Auth C t y P gh " (1999). 1999 D e cisio n s

. P ape r 286. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_1999/286

### Filed October 18, 1999

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 97-3248

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. MISTICK PBT and MISTICK PBT,

v.

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH; L.D. ASTORINO, & ASSOCIATES, LTD. (formerly known a s L.D. ASTORINO ARCHITECTS, INC.); ASTORINO BRANCH ENVIRONMENTAL INC.; ASTORINO BRANCH ENGINEERS; ERNEST E. MILLER, individually; DAVID B. WASHINGTON, individually; LOUIS D. ASTORINO, individually; DENNIS L. ASTORINO, individually; PAT RICK I. BRANCH, individually; BERNARD J. QUINN, individu ally

Mistick PBT,

Appellant

(D.C. No. 95-cv-01876) Argued June 9, 1998
Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, ALITO and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges
(Opinion Filed July 30, 1999)

ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION
The slip opinion filed on July 30, 1999 in the abov e case is hereby amended as follows:

### On page 2, attorney: Arnd N. von Waldow, Esq.,

Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, 435 Sixth Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15219
should be replaced with: Louis C. Long (Argued), Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, 2000 Frick Building Pittsburgh, PA 15219.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Samuel A. Alito, Jr.

Circuit Judge

Date: October 18, 1999

A True Copy: Teste:
Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

2
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-15-00016-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 76th District Court

Titus County, Texas

Trial Court No. 37,692

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Father and Mother1appeal from the termination of their parental-rights to S.S. The clerk’s 

record in this accelerated appeal was filed on February 27, 2015 and the reporter’s record was 

filed, following this Court’s order to file the record, on March 31, 2015. Mother filed her brief on 

April 20, 2015. After abatement to the trial court and the trial court’s entry of an order requiring 

Father to file his brief on or before June 10, 2015, Father filed his brief on that date, establishing 

June 30 as the due date for the brief of the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services 

(the Department). On July 6, 2015, the Department filed its first motion for an extension of time, 

seeking a twenty-day extension of the briefing deadline and making its brief due July 20, 2015.

Rule 6 of the Texas Rules of Judicial Administration sets forth time standards for the 

disposition of certain cases, including cases involving termination of the parent-child relationship. 

Rule 6.2(a) provides that a court of appeals “should, so far as reasonably possible, ensure that the 

appeal [of a suit for termination of a parent-child relationship] is brought to final disposition . . . 

within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed.” TEX. R. JUDICIAL ADMIN. 6.2(a). The 

notice of appeal in this case was filed on February 20, 2015. Consequently, the target disposition 

date for this appeal is August 19, 2015.

Although the Department has not been the source of the delay in this case, it is imperative 

that the Department’s brief be filed on or before July 20, 2015, in order for this Court to ensure 

compliance with Rule 6.2(a). See TEX. R. JUDICIAL ADMIN. 6.2(a). Accordingly, by this order, 

 

1To protect the privacy of the minor children involved in this litigation, we will refer to the appellants as Father and 

Mother.
3

we grant the Department’s motion for an extension of time, and we set the final deadline for filing

the Department’s brief as July 20, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: July 14, 2015
<PAGE>
                                                       (Exhibit 23)






                 Consent of Independent Auditors
                 -------------------------------


The Board of Directors
Americold Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (No. 33-22556) on Form S-8 of Americold Corporation of
our report dated May 2, 1997 relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Americold Corporation as of the last day of February 1996
and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' deficit, and cash flows and related schedule for each
of the years in the three-year period ended the last day of
February 1997, which report appears in the February 28, 1997 Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Americold Corporation.

                           /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Portland, Oregon
May 28, 1997
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,903]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on May 8, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers of Mountain Skylines, Inc, Leavenworth, Washington.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of May 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-15213 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 16, 2015

No. 04-15-00429-CV

IN RE Ronald J. REYES Jr.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On July 13, 2015, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion 

for temporary relief. This court is of the opinion that a serious question concerning the 

mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The

respondent and the real parties in interest may file a response to the petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court no later than July 30, 2015. Any such response must conform to 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. 

Relator’s request for temporary relief is GRANTED. The temporary orders in suit 

affecting the parent-child relationship orally rendered by Judge Stephani Walsh on May 8, 2015 

and later reduced to a written order signed by Judge Karen Pozza on June 26, 2015 are 

temporarily stayed pending further order of this court.

It is so ORDERED on July 16, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015-CI-06251, styled In the Interest of P.R.R., A Child, pending in the 

73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Stephani A. Walsh presiding. Judge Walsh 

rendered the challenged order on May 8, 2015, which was later reduced to a written order and signed by Judge 

Karen Pozza.
@misc{1212016,
  author = {Stephanie Servetas and Nancy Lin and Nadratun Chowdhury and Scott Jackson and Jason Kralj and Sheng Lin-Gibson and Melody Sanders and Tara Eskandari},
  title = {Report from the 2022 NIST Rapid Microbial Testing Methods (RMTM) Workshop},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-08-15 04:08:00},
  publisher = {Special Publication (NIST SP), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936634},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1292},
  language = {en},
}
@conference{1208061,
  author = {Joshua Bienfang and Edwin J. Heilweil and Anand Sampath and Gregory Garrett and Jonathan Shuster and Jeremy Smith and Michael Derenge and Daniel Habersat and Reza Gandhi and Sergei Dolinsky and Enrico Bellotti and michael wrabeck},
  title = {Studies of spatial uniformity and jitter in SiC UV SPADs},
  year = {2023},
  number = {12512},
  month = {2023-06-15 04:06:00},
  publisher = {Proceedings of SPIE Defense and Commercial Sensing 2023 - Advanced Photon Counting Techniques XVII, Orlando, FL, US},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936738},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2663387},
  language = {en},
}
NAME              ISSUE DATE          PRIN            DOC #
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCHATNER          3/28/00           $16,000           9941
GLASSMAN          4/6/00            $32,000           9943
#### Lee *et al. v.*Terbell *et al.*

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

October 22, 1887.)

Judgment—Pleading Jurisdictional Pacts—Code Civil Proc. N. Y. § 532.

*Under*Code Civil Proc. N. Y. § 532, providing that in pleading a judgment it shall not be necessary to allege the jurisdictional facts, but that it may be stated that it was “duly given or made,” an allegation of the appointment of commissioners by a judgment “duly made by and entered in” a certain court is sufficient.

At Law. Demurrer to the complaint.

Richard H. Lee, Henry H. Eaton, C. E. Stuart, and R. T. Barton, plaintiffs, sued Henry S. Terbell, William J. Best, *et ah,*alleging that they were appointed special commissioners by a judgment duly made and entered in the circuit court of Richmond, Virginia, and that the defendants made certain bonds to them. Defendant Terbell demurred, al*851leging that the judgment under which the commissioners were appointed Avas not, sufficiently set out.

*P. Eckerson,*for plaintiffs.

*John*Winslow, for defendants.

Wallace, J.

Upon the argument of the demurrer to the complaint, although no doubt Aras entertained that the second ground of demurrer Aras not tenable, it Avas doubted Arliether the first ground was not well taken; and I AA'as inclined to the opinion that the aArermeuts were not sufiieient to show that the plaintiffs had legal capacity to sue, because of the failure to allege the facts shoAving that the circuit court of the city of Richmond liad jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action, anti of the person of the defendants therein. Section 532, Code Civil Proc., dispenses Avith the necessity of alleging these jurisdictional facts; and the complaint conforms to the requirements of that section by the averments that the judgment AA'hich authorized the plaintiffs to maintain suit in their official character was “duly made.”

The demurrer is therefore overruled, Avith costs.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A in accordance with Rule 15(d)-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Red Trail Energy, LLC (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerald Bachmeier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Gerald BachmeierGerald BachmeierChief Executive OfficerDated: February 16, 2012
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the IRS Forms and Publications Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, February 4, 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marianne Ayala at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10 (a) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the IRS Forms and Publications Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Wednesday, February 4, 2009, at Noon, Eastern Time. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7978, or write Marianne Ayala, TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324. Ms. Ayala can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or you can post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                 

The agenda will include: Various IRS issues. 

Dated: December 22, 2008. 

Roy L. Block, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-150 Filed 1-8-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________

No. 07-9005

____________ JAMES LAMBERT, Appellant

v. JEFFREY BEARD, COMMISSIONER, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WILLIAM STRICKMAN, III, SUPERINTENDENT OF THE STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GREENE; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

____________ APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (D.C. Civil No. 02-cv-09034) District Judge: Honorable Michael M. Baylson

____________ ORDER

____________ Appellant James Lambert has been unde r sentence of death since 1984, during which time the case has wended its way thr ough the state and federal courts. On September 30, 2010, this Court heard argumen t on Lambert’s appeal from the District Court’s denial of his petition for habeas cor pus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, an appeal that challenges the District Court’s dispositi on of the various contentions Lambert raised as to both his conviction for first degree murder and the sentence of death imposed thereon.2 Unless there is a prior disposition of this case, an Opinion of this Court will issue in due course addressing the contentions raised to the conviction itself and whether the judgment of the District Court as to the c onviction should be affirmed. This Court, however, having concluded that, whether reviewed de novo or under AEDPA’s deferential standard of review, the District Court erred in finding that there had not been a violation of the rule of Mills v. Maryland , 486 U.S. 367 (1988). IT is, therefore, on this 23rd day of November 2010 ORDERED that the sentence of death be and hereby is VAC ATED and, pending further order of this Court, any conditions and/or disabilities to which petitioner is being subjected because of the sentence of deat h, including but not lim ited to, being housed other than in the general population, be lifted.

/s/ Maryanne Trump Barry Circuit Judge

Dated: November 23, 2010 nmr/cc: Thomas W. Dolgenos, Esq. Joshua S. Goldwert, Esq. Stuart B. Lev, Esq. Daniel Silverman, Esq.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15214]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,906]


Arrow Electronics, Inc., Melville, NY; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended, an investigation was initiated on May 8, 2009 in response to a 
worker petition filed on behalf of workers of Arrow Electronics, Inc., 
Melville, New York.
    The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 26th day of May 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-15214 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P