alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Flanigan’s Enterprises, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, James G. Flanigan, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1)  This Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, to which this certification is attached as a Exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2)
The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/  James G. FlaniganName:
James G. FlaniganChief Executive Officer and PresidentDate:
December  28, 2010
 
 
 The foregoing certificate is provided solely for the purpose of complying with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and for no other purpose whatsoever. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein or in any of the Company’s previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate the Company’s future filings, including this annual report on Form 10-K, in whole or in part, this certificate shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3616 

To withdraw certain land in the State of New Mexico, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 20, 2010 

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself and Mr. UDALL of New Mexico) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To withdraw certain land in the State of New Mexico, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Law Enforce5 ment Training Center Protection Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 

7 TRAINING CENTER LAND. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—For the purposes of protecting, 

9 operating, and maintaining the Federal Law Enforcement 

10 Training Center in Eddy County, New Mexico, and subject 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3616 IS

1 to valid existing rights, the Federal land described in sub2 section (b) is reserved for use by the Secretary of Home3 land Security for the Federal Law Enforcement Training 

4 Center and withdrawn from— 

5 (1) entry, appropriation, or disposal under the 

6 public land laws; 

7 (2) location, entry, and patent under the mining 

8 laws; and 

9 (3) operation of the mineral leasing, mineral 

10 materials, and geothermal leasing laws. 

11 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The Federal land re12 ferred to in subsection (a) is the approximately 2,700 

13 acres of Federal land generally depicted as the ‘‘With14 drawal Area’’ on the map entitled ‘‘FLETC Land With15 drawal’’ and dated May 4, 2010. 

16 (c) WITHDRAWAL PERIOD.—The withdrawal of the 

17 Federal land described in subsection (b) shall remain in 

18 effect for a period of 20 years beginning on the date of 

19 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          49,067
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      396
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,306
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,457
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,456
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,420
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,859
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,859
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,859
<EPS-BASIC>                                     103.25<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>EPS-PRIMARY REPRESENTS NET LOSS PER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Federico Pignatelli,
certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Biolase, Inc.; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ FEDERICO PIGNATELLI
|Federico Pignatelli    
|Chief Executive Officer
|April 30, 2014
@article{1208851,
  author = {Jian Chen and Ye Song and Wai Cheong Tam and Depeng Kong},
  title = {The Influence of a Plate Obstacle on the Burning Behavior of Small Scale Pool Fires: An Experimental Study},
  year = {2022},
  month = {2022-05-22 04:05:00},
  publisher = {Energy Journal},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=933453},
  language = {en},
}
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-22-00247-CV

__________________

HA PENNY NGUYEN, Appellant

V.

JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 172nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. D-208,390

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In a final order, the trial court granted a plea to the jurisdiction filed by 

Jefferson County, Texas. Ha Penny Nguyen, Appellant, filed a notice of appeal. On 

August 2, 2022, we sent Appellant a certified bill of costs for the filing fee for the 

appeal. On September 2, 2022, through a notice issued by the Clerk of the Court, we 

warned the parties that Appellant had not remitted the filing fee and that unless she 

paid the fee, the Court would dismiss the appeal without further notice on any date 

after October 3, 2022. Appellant neither paid the filing fee nor asserted that she was 
2

unable to afford payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 20.1. None of the parties 

responded to the Clerk’s notices.

In the absence of a satisfactory explanation justifying the appellant’s failure 

to pay the filing fee for the appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on October 19, 2022

Opinion Delivered October 20, 2022

Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15281]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Meetings; Sunshine Act

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

DATE:  Week of June 29, 2009.

PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS:  Public and Closed.

ADDITIONAL ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Week of June 29, 2009

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

1:05 p.m.
    Discussion/Possible Vote on Final Rule--Update to Waste Confidence 
Decision (Public Meeting) (Tentative). (Contact: Rochelle Bavol, 301-
415-1651.)
    This meeting will be webcast live at the Web address--http://www.nrc.gov.
    *The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short 
notice. To verify the status of meetings, call (recording)--(301) 415-
1292. Contact person for more information: Rochelle Bavol, (301) 415-
1651.
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policy-making/schedule.html.
    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation 
to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or 
the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another 
format (e.g., braille, large print), please notify the NRC's Disability 
Program Coordinator, Rohn Brown, at 301-492-2279, TDD: 301-415-2100, or 
by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a28353234743828352d341a342839743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0775686f692965756870694769756429606871">[email protected]</span></a>. Determinations on requests for 
reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.
    This notice is distributed electronically to subscribers. If you no 
longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the 
distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, 
DC 20555 (301-415-1969), or send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e480859688818a81ca93968d838c90a48a9687ca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1b7f7a69777e757e356c69727c736f5b756978357c746d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 23, 2009.
Rochelle C. Bavol,
Office of the Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-15281 Filed 6-24-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00221-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.L.W., S.Y.W. and L.D.L., Children

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-PA-01142

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order of termination is 

AFFIRMED. 

We order that no costs be assessed against appellant Mother because she is indigent. 

SIGNED July 15, 2015.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
#### Princetel, LLC, Appellant, v Christopher M. Buckley et al., Respondents.

Submitted November 26, 2012;

decided January 8, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the orders sought to be appealed from do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SGS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report), the undersigned each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                                                
|----------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|November 12, 2008 |  | /s/ Henry R. Baughman                          
|                  |  | Henry R. Baughman                              
|                  |  | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
|                  | 
|November 12, 2008 |  | /s/ James M. Dahmus                            
|                  |  | James M. Dahmus                                
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          15,262
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      409
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          19,129
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,868
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,440
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,255
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,345
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,999
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,553
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,553
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,553
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   215.58<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>EPS-PRIMARY REPRESENTS NET EARNINGS PER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1 Scheuld 1.1C Initial Guarantors






SCHEDULE 1.1C
Northeast Office Venture, Limited Liability Company
M/I Homes Service, LLC 
M/I Properties LLC
M/I Homes of Central Ohio, LLC
M/I Homes of Cincinnati, LLC
M/I Homes of Austin, LLC
M/I Homes of DC, LLC
M/I Homes of Chicago, LLC
M/I Homes of Houston, LLC
M/I Homes of San Antonio, LLC
M/I Homes of Florida, LLC
M/I Homes of Raleigh, LLC
M/I Homes of Charlotte, LLC
M/I Homes First Indiana LLC
M/I Homes Second Indiana LLC
Prince Georges Utilities, LLC
Wilson Farm, L.L.C.
The Fields at Perry Hall, L.L.C.
M/I Homes of Tampa, LLC
M/I Homes of West Palm Beach, LLC
M/I Homes of Orlando, LLC
MHO Holdings, LLC
M/I Homes of Indiana, L.P.
MHO, LLC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            4,528,291
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4,793,806
<PP&E>                                              885,504
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (179,125)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    7,056,059
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2,594,772
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            262,818
<OTHER-SE>                                       38,399,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      7,056,059
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          0
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     6,061,255
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   59,108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,002,147)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,002,147)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,002,147)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0


</TABLE>
#### CAPDEVIELLE v. AMERICAN COMMERCIAL ALCOHOL CORPORATION et al.

District Court. S. D. New York.

May 20, 1940.

David Lee Cotton, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Stewart M. Seymour, of New York City, for defendants.

LEIBELL, District Judge.

Defendants move (a) to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground (1) that it is not a short and plain statement of a claim in accordance with Rule 8 (a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c and (2) that it contains a great quantity of immaterial, impertinent, scandalous and prejudicial matter; or in the alternative (b) to strike from the complaint certain paragraphs as redundant, immaterial, impertinent and scandalous matter; (c) for judgment dismissing the third cause of action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and (d) for a bill of particulars.

Three causes of action are alleged by the plaintiff. The first two are based upon an alleged breach of contract. The first proceeds against the two corporations and the second against the individual defendant in the alternative if the corporations are not liable. The third cause of action is directed solely against the individual defendant. It is a composite of breach of contract, misrepresentation and deceit, and negligence.

Simplicity and clarity of pleading were intended to be achieved by the new rules of civil procedure. The amended complaint herein is a hodge-podge of material and immaterial, relevant and irrelevant matter. Paragraphs 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 and 14 have no place in the pleading. Paragraph 21 should not by reference or otherwise, incorporate in the third cause of action all the allegations of the first and second causes of action. A great many of the allegations of the amended complaint seem to have no bearing upon the issues involved. It is doubtful whether much of the matter set forth would even be admissible as evidence upon the trial.

I am unable to determine the real nature of the claim alleged against the in*366dividual defendant in the third cause of action. It should be re-cast to comply with Rule 8 (a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Under the circumstances, I am of the opinion that the complaint must be dismissed. See, Atwater v. American Coal Corporation1 (S.D.N.Y.), decided September 30, 1939, by Judge Clancy. The motion to dismiss the amended complaint is granted with leave to the plaintiff to serve a second amended complaint within ten days from the service of an order herein. The other parts of defendants’ motion need not be considered. Submit order on notice.

1

 No opinion for publiction.