IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-60093

Summary Calendar

CATHY L. TOOLE,

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

BARACK OBAMA, President; JOHN ROBERTS, Chief Judge; LOUIS 

GUIROLA, JR., Judge; ROBERT H. WALKER, Magistrate Judge; HALIL 

SULEYMAN OZERDEN, Judge; JUDGE MICHAEL T. PARKER, Magistrate 

Judge; KEITH STARRETT, Judge; C. R. FISCHER; GEORGE OPFER; 

LINDA A. HALLIDAY; RICHARD A. DALEY; SCOTT LEVINS; MELANIE 

S. LANE; SUPREME COURT JUDGES (13-9004); DOCTOR UNKNOWN 

SANDERS, Ms.; ROBERT MCDONALD,

Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:14-CV-415

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 10, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-60093 Document: 00513111692 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/10/2015
No. 15-60093

2

Cathy L. Toole brings suit against numerous defendants, alleging that 

the Department of Veterans Affairs failed to pay benefits to her and her 

children. The district court dismissed the suit. We affirm.

Ms. Toole’s late-husband, James L. Toole, served in the United States 

Army in the 1950s and was discharged after he was struck in the left ear with 

a rifle during training. After he died, Ms. Toole alleged that her husband’s

death was service-related. The Board of Veterans Appeals disagreed. Ms. 

Toole appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, 

which affirmed.1 Ms. Toole appealed to the Federal Circuit, which dismissed 

the appeal as it was required to do under 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2) after finding 

that Ms. Toole raised only factual challenges to the decision below.2 Ms. Toole 

subsequently filed six more lawsuits in different federal district courts 

challenging the agency’s decision, all of which were dismissed.3 This case is 

the seventh. It is brought against President Obama, numerous federal judges, 

and several administrative officers of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

All claims against the President of the United States in his official 

capacity were properly dismissed because he is absolutely immune from any 

damages stemming from official acts.4 All claims against the named federal 

judges arise from actions taken in their judicial capacities, and it is long-settled 

law that a judge is immune from liability from actions “taken in the judge’s 

judicial capacity.”5 Finally, this Court of Appeals lacks jurisdiction to review 

 

1 Toole v. Shinseki, No. 07-2675, 2009 WL 2612426 (Vet. App. Aug. 27, 2009). 2 Toole v. Shinseki, 364 F. App’x 627, 629 (Fed. Cir. 2010).

3 See Toole v. Weinstein, No. 06-CV-716 (S.D. Miss. 2006); Toole v. Peak, No. 08-CV1481 (S.D. Miss. 2008), aff’d, 361 F. App’x 621 (5th Cir. 2010); Toole v. Obama, No. 10-CV418 (S.D. Miss. 2010); Toole v. Obama, No. 11-CV-508 (S.D. Miss. 2011); Toole v. Obama, 12-

CV-363 (S.D. Miss. 2012); Toole v. Obama, No. 13-CV-1038 (D.D.C. 2013), aff’d, 542 F. App’x 

1 (D.C. Cir. 2013), cert denied 134 S. Ct. 1948 (2014). 

4 Forrester v. White, 484 U.S. 219, 225 (1988).

5 Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11 (1991) (per curium). 

 Case: 15-60093 Document: 00513111692 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/10/2015
No. 15-60093

3

the decisions of the Board of Veterans Appeals.6 We affirm the dismissal of all 

claims brought against Veterans Affairs employees.

The district court dismissed the appeal as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2). For the well-stated reasons of the court below, we agree. We 

affirm the district court in all other respects.

We DISMISS THIS APPEAL AS FRIVOLOUS and AFFIRM the 

judgment of the district court.

 

6 Zuspann v. Brown, 60 F.3d 1156, 1158 (5th Cir. 1995); see also 38 U.S.C. § 7292.

 Case: 15-60093 Document: 00513111692 Page: 3 Date Filed: 07/10/2015