alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10c






                                                                                                                                                                      Exhibit 10c.
        
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
345 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10154




Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent
388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10013
Attention:  Pamela Kowalski
May 31, 2013




Ladies and Gentlemen:


Re: Extension of Maturity Date


Reference is made to the Five Year Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Facility Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) dated as of July 30, 2012 among Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), the Borrowing Subsidiaries, the lenders parties thereto (the “Lenders”), certain Agents, Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning assigned to such terms in the Credit Agreement.


Pursuant to Section 2.5 of the Credit Agreement, the Company hereby requests that the Lenders extend the Maturity Date in effect on the date hereof (i.e., July 30, 2017) to the first anniversary of such Maturity Date, such that the extended Maturity Date under the Credit Agreement will be July 30, 2018.  This letter shall constitute an “Extension Letter” as referred to in Section 2.5 of the Credit Agreement.




                                	
	
	Very truly yours,
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY

	 

	By:   /s/ Jeffrey Galik
Name:  Jeffrey Galik
Title:    Senior Vice President and Treasurer
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Aamaxan Transport Group, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period  ended  April 30,  2006 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned,  in the capacity and on the
date indicated below,  hereby certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date: June 7, 2006                             /s/ Marc Juliar

                                               Marc Juliar
                                               Chief Executive Officer and
                                               Chief Financial Officer

























--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

PEDRO VALENTIN,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 76 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The undersigned, David Gorodyansky, the Chief Financial Officer of INTELLIGENT BUYING. INC.  (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 12th day of May 2011.





/s/ David Gorodyansky





David Gorodyansky


Principal Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Intelligent Buying, Inc. and will be retained by Intelligent Buying, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
@conference{11811,
  author = {Simon Kaplan and Solomon Woods and Adriaan Carter and Timothy Jung},
  title = {Calibration of IR Test Chambers with the Missile Defense Transfer Radiometer},
  year = {2013},
  month = {2013-09-30},
  publisher = {Proceedings of SPIE Vol 8707, Baltimore, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=913741},
  language = {en},
}
Rail Employer Reporting Instructions

Part I - Prerequisite Knowledge for Rail Employer Reporting 

Chapter 1: What is the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board?

1

The U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) is an independent agency in the executive branch of 

the Federal Government.

Function

The RRB’s primary function is to administer comprehensive retirement-survivor and 

unemployment-sickness benefit programs for the nation’s railroad workers and their families 

under the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act 

(RUIA). As part of the retirement program, the RRB also has administrative responsibilities 

under the Social Security Act for certain benefit payments and Medicare coverage to the nation’s 

railroad workers’ and their families.

Benefit Payments

The benefit payments administered by the RRB are based on earnings credits defined as 

creditable service and compensation. The RRB maintains a lifetime record of creditable service 

and compensation for each railroad employee for the purpose of determining benefit payments.

Service and compensation information is collected from reports of employers covered under the 

RRA and the RUIA, including rail labor employers. In the context of reporting to the RRB, the 

term “employer” refers to both rail carriers and national rail labor organizations. 

The RRB is authorized to require an employer to submit service and compensation information 

by RRB Regulation 20 CFR 209.2 and by RRA sections 7(b)(6) and 9 and RUIA sections 6 and 

12(1). Both Acts make provision for enforcement of reporting requirements.
97-579.

#### State v. Love.

Hamilton App. Nos. C-960498 and C-960499. On motion for stay of court of appeals proceedings. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                                   State or Providence
                                                    of Incorporation
      Company                                       or Organization
      -------                                       ---------------

Kimmins Contracting Corp............................. Florida

Kimmins Ltd.......................................... Ontario, Canada

Kimmins Industrial Service Corp...................... Delaware

Kimmins Abatement Corp............................... Delaware

ThermoCor Kimmins, Inc............................... Florida
   (f/k/a Kimmins Thermal Corp.)

Kimmins Specialty Contracting, Inc................... Florida

Kimmins Associates, Inc.............................. Delaware

Kimmins Equipment Leasing Corp....................... Florida

TransCor Waste Services, Inc......................... Florida

Bay Area Recycling and Fibers, Inc................... Florida

Kimmins Incorporated................................. Texas

Kimmins International................................ Florida

Factory Street Corporation........................... Tennessee



1340937
@article{1212781,
  author = {Ben Neely and Debra Ellisor and Clay Davis},
  title = {Proteomics as a metrological tool to evaluate genome annotation accuracy following de novo genome assembly: a case study using the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus)},
  year = {2023},
  number = {14},
  month = {2023-08-25 04:08:00},
  publisher = {Genes},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14091696},
  language = {en},
}
@misc{1216371,
  author = {James Burkholder and Oivind Hondnebrog and Brian McDonald and Vladimir L. Orkin and Vassilis Papadimitriou and Daniel Van Hoomissen},
  title = {SUMMARY OF ABUNDANCES, LIFETIMES, ODPs, REs, GWPs, GTPs},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-02-01 05:02:00},
  publisher = {Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion 2022},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936562},
  language = {en},
}
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 9, 

2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00860-CV

DEBRA V. JENNINGS, ESQ. AND DEBRA V. JENNINGS, P.L.L.C., 

Appellant

V.

AMERICAN ASSET FINANCE, L.L.C., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1030758-401

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed September 17, 2014. On July 2, 

2015, appellant filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, McCally, and Donovan
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 16

- 00034

- CR

WILLIAM KYLE ANDERSO N

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 40th District Court of Ellis County , Texas Trial Cause No. 38,768CR

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this caus e on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
November 2, 2017
RYAN ALAN WELCH

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 1845

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed July 24, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jan Shackelford , Judge

. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford and A. Victoria Wiggins, Assistant Public Defenders

, Tallahassee, fo r Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Wesley Cross Paxson, Assistant Attorney General

, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE

, SWANSON

, and MAKAR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

A.L.P., A CHILD,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D22-1566

LT Case Nos. 2021-78-CJMA

2020-65-CJMA

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Respondent. 

________________________________/

Opinion filed July 15, 2022

Petition for Writ of Prohibition,

Joan Anthony, Respondent Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender,

and Kelly M. Traynor, and Craig R.

Atack, Assistant Public Defenders, 

St. Augustine, for Petitioner. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh

Morris, Assistant Attorney General,

Daytona Beach, for Respondent. 

PER CURIAM.
2

A.L.P. petitions this court for a writ of prohibition following the denial of

his motion to disqualify the presiding judge. We conclude that the motion to 

disqualify was legally sufficient and, accordingly, we grant the writ.

A party may seek disqualification of an assigned trial judge when the 

party reasonably fears that he or she will not receive a fair trial or hearing 

because of specifically described prejudice or bias of the judge. Fla. R. Gen. 

Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.330(e)(1). “To be legally sufficient the motion to 

disqualify must establish a ‘well-grounded fear on the part of the movant that 

he will not receive a fair hearing,’ and such fear must be objective rather than 

subjective.” Dumas v. State, 331 So. 3d 307, 308 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021)

(quoting Lynch v. State, 2 So. 3d, 47, 78 (Fla. 2008)). Here, the motion to 

disqualify alleged that the trial judge made specific comments, before 

evidence was ever introduced in the case, that would put a reasonably 

prudent person in well-founded fear of not receiving a fair or impartial 

hearing. While a trial judge may form mental impressions and opinions 

during the course of a hearing, he or she may not, as it appears the presiding 

judge did here, prejudge the case. E.g., id. (citing Minaya v. State, 118 So. 

3d 926, 929 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)). We grant the writ of prohibition and 

remand this case for assignment to a different judge.

PETITION GRANTED.

EVANDER, WALLIS, and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.
$30.0

$25.0

$20.0

$15.0

$10.0

$5.0

$0.0

$16.8

2003

2003-2012 GROSS GAMING REVENUE TRENDS

$19.5

2004

$22.6

2005

(In Billions)

261 $26.7 $26.5
$24.9.

2006 2007 2008 2009

Source: National Indian Gaming Commission

$26.5

2010

$27.2

2011

2012
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andre Youngblood, Appellant.

[851 NYS2d 873]

The People met their burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, risk factors bearing a sufficient total point score to support a level three sex offender adjudication. The record supports the court’s assessments relating to forcible compulsion, substance abuse history, and conduct while confined. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Gonzalez and Acosta, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE ELEVEN MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1998
(IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO FINAL LIQUIDATING DISTRIBUTION) AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN SUCH
REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>          11-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>      NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>           NOV-30-1998

<CASH>                         1,264,405 
<SECURITIES>                        0    
<RECEIVABLES>                       0    
<ALLOWANCES>                        0    
<INVENTORY>                         0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               1,264,405 
<PP&E>                              0    
<DEPRECIATION>                      0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 1,264,405 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               0    
<BONDS>                             0    
<COMMON>                            0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0    
<PREFERRED>                         0    
<OTHER-SE>                     1,264,405 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   1,264,405 
<SALES>                           47,500 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 117,790 
<CGS>                               0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     46,517 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 212,166 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (140,893)
<INCOME-TAX>                        0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (140,893)
<DISCONTINUED>                      0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0    
<CHANGES>                           0    
<NET-INCOME>                    (140,893)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (7.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (7.18)

        


</TABLE>
DISMISSED; Opinion Filed April 17, 2013. 

# S

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05

- 13

- 00472

- CV
IN RE BYRON BERNARD DUPREE , Relator Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F97

- 47901

- K
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Myers Opinion by Justice Myers Before the Court is relator = s petition for writ of mandamus naming the district at torney, as respondent. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. This Court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over the district attorney. See T EX

. G OV = T C ODE A NN

. ' 22.221 (West 2004). Accordingly, we DI SMISS relator = s petition for a writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

130472F.P05 /Lana Myers/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brekford International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chandra (C.B.) Brechin, Principal Executive Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| | /s/ Chandra (C.B.) Brechin 
| | Chandra (C.B.) Brechin     
| | Principal Executive Officer
| |                            
| | Date: August 14, 2008      



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Equine Alliance Corporation;
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
      Schlosser, Chief
      Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001,
      that:




The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      August 29, 2007


/s/Michael
                    SchlosserMichael
                    Schlosser
                  Chief
                    Accounting Officer
CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q REPORT
                                       OF
          SECURITY CAPITAL ASSURANCE LTD PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
              (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. SS.SS. 1350(a) and (b))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18
U.S.C. SS.SS. 1350(a) and (b)), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 of
Security Capital Assurance Ltd (the "Company") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                    Dated: November 14, 2006



                                    /s/ Paul S. Giordano
                                    -----------------------------
                                    PAUL S. GIORDANO
                                    PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                    SECURITY CAPITAL ASSURANCE LTD



                                    Dated: November 14, 2006



                                    /s/ David P. Shea
                                    -----------------------------
                                    DAVID P. SHEA
                                    EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF
                                    FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                    SECURITY CAPITAL ASSURANCE LTD


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Security Capital Assurance Ltd and
will be retained by Security Capital Assurance Ltd and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Eldrid Sequeira, Appellant, v Rachel Sequeira, Respondent.

Submitted June 24, 2013;

decided September 3, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Judge Abdus-Salaam taking no part.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

--------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gold Holdings Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Demitro Marianovich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|Registrant            | Gold Holdings Corporation                                                                             
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2010 | By: /s/ Demitro Marianovich                                                                           
|                      |                                                                                                       
|                      | Demitro Marianovich
Chief Executive Officer (Principle Executive Officer, Principle Financial Officer)





| | 26 | 
| | -- | 
|