alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - October 2003 

Regular Retirement 

and Survivor Benefits 

Benefit payments October 2003 October 2002 

Total $736,788,000 $727,441,000 

Retired employees 470,828,000 461,196,000 

Spouses and divorced spouses 88,645,000 88,340,000 

Widow(er)s - aged and disabled 155,733,000 156,575,000 

Other survivors 21,582,000 21,330,000 

Number Average1 Number Average1 

Total 625,800 ......... 2,600 ......... ......... 

Regular employee annuities, total 292,600 $1,593 1,100 $2,138 ......... 

Age 209,900 1,557 2 400 2 2,598 3 $1,204 

Disability, Full Retirement Age and Over 36,000 1,420 ......... ......... ......... 

Disability, Under Full Retirment Age 46,600 1,891 400 2,071 

Spouses and divorced spouses 146,400 599 800 731 

Widow(er)s--aged and disabled 158,200 983 600 1,351 

Widowed mothers and fathers 1,100 1,288 4/ 1,467 

Widow(er)s--remarried and divorced 15,000 649 100 651 

Children 12,500 745 100 959 

Other survivors 100 654 ......... ......... ......... 

854 725 

647 663 

841 927 

5/ / 

589 610 

......... 

440 335 

$901 

......... 

......... 

......... 

Monthly benefits 

Being Paid Awarded 

Average under 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded in 

month 

Social Security 

October 2003 

5

Supplemental 

Employee 

Annuities 

Benefit payments 

October October 

2003 2002 Number Average 

$5,400,000 $5,585,000 128,900 $42 500 $41 

Being paid 

end of month 

Awarded 

in month 

Number Average 

1

Railroad retirement benefits shown are net of reduction for social security benefit entitlement.

2

For employees retiring directly from the railroad industry with full age annuity (their years of service averaged 34); about 300

other age annuities were awarded in the month. 

3

For men aged 65 or over insured on regular basis.

4

Fewer than 50.

5

Remarried and divorced widow(er)s included with aged and disabled widow(er)s and widowed mothers and fathers.

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited) and are partly estimated. Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. 

(Over) 
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Railroad Retirement 

and Unemployment Insurance Systems - (Continued) 

October 2003 

Unemployment and Sickness Benefits 

Unemployment 3,200 $271 

Sickness 7,300 273 

Unemployment 

Sickness 5,074,000 5,657,000 

2,958,000 3,311,000 

Benefit payments 

October 2002 

Total $8,032,000 $8,968,000 

498 

October 2003 

Per 

full week 

$483 

Number of beneficiaries 

during month 

Per 2-week 

registration period 

Average payment 

Note. --Data are on a cash basis (unaudited). Detail may not add to totals due to rounding 

Recycled 

Paper 

Published by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board 

Bureau of the Actuary and the Office of Public Affairs
#### BARRECA v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.

Civil Action No. 6476.

District Court, E. D. New York.

May 3, 1946.

Blank & Convisser, of Brooklyn, N. Y., (William A. Blank, of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Louis J. Carruthers, of New York City, for defendant.

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is an action for personal injuries under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq.

Plaintiff has made a motion under Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for an order allowing the plaintiff a discovery and inspection of statements made by employees of defendant who witnessed plaintiff’s accident, and a medical report of an examination of the plaintiff made by defendant’s physician, also for an order allowing the plaintiff a discovery and inspection and the taking of photographs of. the locomotive upon which the plaintiff was working at the time of the accident. •

The defendant has no objection to the; taking of photographs of the locomotive; but does object to furnishing the plaintiff’ the' statements of its employees and al'so; the medical report. The defendant urges as a ground of objection that “it is likely that the plaintiff’s attorney would use these statements in a cross-examination of the witnesses rather than taking their direct testimony. Deponent is not opposed to the taking of the depositions of the employees' and is willing to produce these four employees at the Court for that purpose. . It.' is further submitted that the plaintiff can without any difficulty take the deposition of Dr. Ruvane and. does .not need any discovery and inspection óf his report to ¡the defendant.”

It would appear that the reason urged' by the defendant in opposition, namely, that the statements may be used in cross-examining the witnesses, is an excellent reason for the plaintiff requesting these' statements taken by the defendant. For the reasons stated in Dugger v. Baltimore’ & Ohio Railroad Company, D.C., *S'*F.R.D. 334, decided herewith, this motion is granted.- • ■ - •

Settle order on notice.
#### ZUCKERMAN v. PILOT et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Jan. 12, 1940.

*131Zelig R. Nathanson, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Abraham H. Brown, of New York City, for defendants.

HULBERT, District Judge.

Defendants move under Rule 30(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to vacate a notice to take their depositions orally pursuant to notice heretofore served by the plaintiff, upon the ground that said examination is sought in bad faith and for the purpose of annoying and embarrassing the defendants and moreover subjects them to a penalty or forfeiture and may tend to incriminate them, and that they are therefore privileged in refusing to answer any questions involved in the issues of this action.

The suit is one for damages under Section 50 of Title 35 U.S.C.A. The defendants are charged with intent to deceive the public by causing a patent number to be affixed to articles which were not manufactured under U. S. Letters Patent designated by such number.

The defendants contend that under the practice prevailing prior to the effective date of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure such examination is unauthorized and rely, inter alia, upon Newgold v. American Electrical Novelty & Mfg. Co., 108 F. 341, decided in this District April 17, 1901.

With that contention I am not in accord. See Moore’s Federal Practice Act Under the New Federal Rules (1938) Vol. 2, Sec. 26.03, pages 2455 and 2456, and Dyer-Smith Federal Examinations before Trial (1939 Edition) page 41.

Such order as the Court is authorized to make pursuant to Rule 30(b) shall be “upon notice and for good cause shown”.

There is nothing attached to the notice of motion in this case except a copy of the notice sought to be vacated. On the argument defendants’ counsel submitted the pleadings, but I am constrained to hold this is not a compliance with the Rule.

However, Rule 30(d) provides that at any time during the taking of a deposition “ * * * upon a showing that the examination is being conducted in bad faith or in such manner as unreasonably to annoy, embarrass, or oppress the deponent or party, the court * * * may order the officer conducting the examination to cease forthwith from taking the deposition, or may limit the scope and manner of the taking of the deposition as provided in subdivision (b).”

This rule clearly presupposes that the Court will have before it some record of what has theretofore transpired in order to act, in that contingency, as authorized by subdivision (b). But that situation has not developed so that subdivision (d) is not applicable.

So far as penalty and incrimination are concerned, either, or both of the defendants may plead their constitutional privilege upon the examination and secure a ruling, but it would appear from the answer of the defendants that the occasion for so doing is hardly likely to arise.

Motion denied without prejudice to a proper application pursuant to the provisions of Rule 30(d) if and when the necessity therefor arises. Settle order on notice.
@misc{1216316,
  author = {Joshua Bienfang and Thomas Gerrits and Paulina Kuo and Alan Migdall and Sergey Polyakov and Oliver T. Slattery},
  title = {Single-photon Sources and Detectors Dictionary},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-09-07 04:09:00},
  publisher = {NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936568},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8486},
  language = {en},
}
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 667 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 667

 Providing for bipartisan subpoena authority during the 116th Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2019

Mr. John W. Rose of Tennessee submitted the following resolution; which 
                 was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for bipartisan subpoena authority during the 116th Congress.

    Resolved, That during the 116th Congress:
            (1) In all matters referred to by the Speaker in her 
        announcement of September 24, 2019, the chairman and ranking 
        minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary or any other 
        committee involved shall have coequal subpoena power.
            (2) Subpoenas may be authorized under this paragraph by the 
        chairman and the ranking minority member acting jointly, or, if 
        either declines to act, by the other acting alone, except that 
        in the event either so declines, either shall have the right to 
        refer to the committee for decision the question whether such 
        authority shall be so exercised and the committee shall be 
        convened promptly to render that decision.
            (3) Subpoenas and interrogatories so authorized may be 
        issued over the signature of the chairman, or ranking minority 
        member, or any member designated by either of them, and may be 
        served by any person designated by the chairman, or ranking 
        minority member, or any member designated by either of them. 
        The chairman, or ranking minority member, or any member 
        designated by either of them (or, with respect to any 
        deposition, answer to interrogatory, or affidavit, any person 
        authorized by law to administer oaths) may administer oaths to 
        any witness.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 10.19**

 

**AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE**

**TO THE NEIMAN MARCUS, INC.**

**MANAGEMENT EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN**

 

This Amendment Number Three to the Neiman Marcus, Inc. Management Equity Incentive Plan (the “Amendment”) is made effective as of January 4, 20 11, with respect to all Options outstanding as of such date and granted on or after such date, by Neiman Marcus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).

 

W I T N E S S E T H:

 

WHEREAS, the Neiman Marcus, Inc. Management Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”) was established by the Company effective as of November 29, 2005; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan to adjust the number of Fair Value Options and Performance Options reserved for issuance thereunder;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority reserved in Section 4.12, the Plan is amended as follows:

 

1.             Section 4 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

 

Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.13 hereof, the Board may grant to Participants Options to purchase shares of Common Stock of the Company that, in the aggregate, do not exceed 80,708.7725 shares of Common Stock, of which 30,343. 167 shall be Performance Options and 50,365.605 shall be Fair Value Options.  To the extent that any Option granted under the Plan terminates, expires or is cancelled without having been exercised, the shares of Common Stock covered by such Option shall again be available for Grant under the Plan.

 

2.             Except as otherwise specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed on its behalf by its duly authorized officer on this the 8th day of January, 2011.

 
| ** ** | ** ** | **NEIMAN   MARCUS, INC.**                   |
|------------|------------|---------------------------------------------|
|       |       |                                        |
|       |       |                                        |
|       | By:        | /s/  Nelson   A. Bangs                 |
|       |       | Senior   Vice President and General Counsel |

 

----
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO**

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

This Certification is intendedto accompany the Annual Report of RevCare, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSBfor the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and is given solely forthe purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. To the bestof his knowledge, the undersigned, Manuel Occiano, Chief Executive Officer,hereby certifies that:

 

1. The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. 

 
|   | /s/  Manuel Occiano, Chief Executive Officer |                          |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|   |                                              |
|   |                                              |   Date: January 29, 2004 |
|        |                                                   |                               |  |

 

----
TDCJ Offender Details Page 1 of2 

T~XAS [}I;P.ARTMENT OF CRIMINAl JUSTICE· New Offender Search 

Offender Information Details 

Return to Search list 

SID Number: 

TDCJ Number: 

Name: 

Race: 

Gender: 

DOB: 

Maximum Sentence Date: 

Current Facility: 

Projected Release Date: 

Parole Eligibility Date: 

Offender Visitation Eligible: 

05276731 

00773394 

MURFF,SANTONIO DEMON 

B 

M 

1974-04-30 

LIFE SENTENCE 

ROBERTSON 

LIFE SENTENCE 

2035-01-17 

YES 

Information provided is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times per day 

on visitation days. Because this information is subject to change, family members and · 

friends are encouraged to call the unit prior to traveling for a visit. 

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE: 

Scheduled Release Date: Offender is not scheduled for release at this time. 

Scheduled Release Type: Will be determined when release date is scheduled. 

Scheduled Release Location: Will be determined when release date is scheduled. 

Parole Review Information 

Offense History: 

Offense 

Date 

I 

Offense 

I 

Sentence 

Date County 

I I 

Case 

No. 

I 

Sentence (YY -MMDD) 

http://offender.tdcj.texas.gov/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=05276731 7/23/2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000823610
<NAME>                        Rancon Pacific Realty, LP
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     u.s. dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         1,626
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,760
<PP&E>                                         41,285
<DEPRECIATION>                                 10,929
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 32,573
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          512
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   32,573
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,059
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,870
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             961
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                228
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            228
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                6
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   222
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 539 

Supporting the goals and ideals of The American Legion. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 16, 2019 

Mr. CARSON of Indiana (for himself, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. BANKS, Mrs. BROOKS

of Indiana, Mr. BUCSHON, Mr. HOLLINGSWORTH, Mr. PENCE, Mr. VISCLOSKY, and Mrs. WALORSKI) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of The American Legion. 

Whereas The American Legion was founded on March 15, 

1919; 

Whereas Congress chartered The American Legion on September 16, 1919; 

Whereas, in 2019, The American Legion celebrates 100 years 

of serving veterans of the Armed Forces, their families, 

and communities; 

Whereas The American Legion is the largest wartime veterans service organization in the United States; 

Whereas The American Legion is headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, and has approximately 2,000,000 members 

of the Armed Forces and veterans in its membership; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 539 IH 

Whereas The American Legion has counted among its members 10 Presidents of the United States; 

Whereas The American Legion has played a vital role in advocating for veterans’ affairs, including the passage of 

the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944 (commonly 

known as the ‘‘G.I. Bill’’) (58 Stat. 284, chapter 268) 

and the creation of the Department of Veterans Affairs; 

Whereas The American Legion has shown steadfast dedication to improving local communities, contributing approximately 3,700,000 volunteer community service hours 

annually and millions of dollars in college scholarships to 

students across the United States; 

Whereas the 100th anniversary of The American Legion is in 

2019; 

Whereas the mantra of The American Legion’s 100th anniversary, ‘‘Legacy of the last 100 years and Vision for the 

next 100’’, is an apt description of the contributions of 

The American Legion to life in the United States 

throughout 100 years of service and mutual helpfulness; 

and 

Whereas the 101st National Convention of The American Legion will be held August 23 through August 29, 2019, in 

Indianapolis, Indiana: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors the vital role The American Legion 

3 has played in the United States; 

4 (2) recognizes that The American Legion has 

5 been a cornerstone of life in the United States from 

6 the local to the Federal level and serves as a conVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:49 Aug 16, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR539.IH HR539

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 539 IH 

1 stant reminder of the inestimable contributions the 

2 members of the Armed Forces have made to enrich 

3 life in the United States during and after their serv4 ice; and 

5 (3) celebrates the continued position of The 

6 American Legion as an inextinguishable beacon of 

7 community, responsibility, honor, and service. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICERANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nicolas Lavaud, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of ITonis Inc., (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for
      the nine months ended August 31, 2006 (the Quarterly Report) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                    

| | By:    |                            
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        | /s/ *Nicolas Lavaud*       
| | Name:  | Nicolas Lavaud             
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | October 16, 2006           

---
96-2651.

#### Titus v. Marzocco.

Clermont App. No. CA96-02-026. Reported at 78 Ohio St.3d 1410, 675 N.E.2d 1249. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.