alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Labor Employer Reporting Instructions

Part I - Prerequisite Knowledge for Labor Employer Reporting 

Chapter 2: The Role of the National Reporting Officer

1

Designating a NRO

 

Each employer must designate at least one person as an official Railroad Retirement Board 

(RRB) contact. The National Reporting Officer (NRO) serves as the point of contact for railroad 

retirement report matters on behalf of the grand lodge, local lodges, and system subordinate units 

of a rail labor employer. 

The NRO is an agent of the RRB and is designated by the grand lodge through the Labor 

Member's Office (LMO). After an NRO has been designated, the designated NRO will receive a 

written position description detailing responsibilities. The position description is provided in 

Appendix III. 

NRO Responsibilities 

The NRO is responsible for service and compensation reports and employee earnings records. 

Correspondence related to service and compensation reports, such as informational circular 

letters and report error referrals will be directed to the NRO. The NRO should: 

• Understand how to complete forms properly; 

• Answer RRB inquiries promptly;

• Be familiar with the "Reporting Instructions to Labor Employers"; and

• Communicate reporting instructions to the local lodges, system subordinate units and 

other staff members who are involved in preparing reports. 

The NRO must thoroughly understand the Railroad Retirement Board's reporting requirements. 

Erroneous reports can create difficulties and financial hardships for employees in obtaining 

correct benefit payments and can create unnecessary paperwork for the RRB and the employer. 

NRO Name and Address Changes 

NRO name and address changes should be submitted to the LMO at the RRB.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30548-30551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15113]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 09-21]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 09-21 with attached transmittal, and 
policy justification.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 30549]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26JN09.207


[[Page 30550]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26JN09.208


[[Page 30551]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26JN09.209


    Dated: May 27, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9-15113 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40041

Summary Calendar

 

PHILLIP CHARLES MELONCON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICKY BLACKBURN, In his Official Capacity as 

Chief Sheriff, Morris County, TX,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:95-CV-73

- - - - - - - - - -

August 26, 1996

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ricky Charles Meloncon appeals the district court’s order

granting the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant,

Ricky Blackburn. Based upon a careful review of the record and

the briefs, we hold, for reasons expressed by the district court,

that the district court did not err in entering summary judgment

for Blackburn. In light of this holding, we need not consider

whether the district court abused its discretion in dismissing
No.

- 2 -

the complaint for failure to prosecute. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual
Report of Cardiff Lexington Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alex Cunningham, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:



1.       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: October 21, 2022



| | By: /s/ Alex Cunningham                              
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| | Alex Cunningham                                      
| | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Elizabeth A. Young, CSR, RPR 

Official Court Reporter 

P. O. Box 747 

Belton, Texas 76513 

254 933-5268 

July 14, 2015 

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle 

Clerk, Court of Appeals 

P. O. Box 12547 

Austin, Texas 78711-2547 

tel 512 463-1733 

fax 512 463-1685 

In re: State vs John Lee Bowman 

 COA: 03-15-00263-CR TC # 73061 

Attn: Chris Knowles 

Dear Chris, 

I am requesting an extension to complete this reporter's 

record by August 15, 2015. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ Elizabeth A. Young 

Elizabeth A. Young 

cc: Kristen Jernigan
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

MACNAK Korte Team LLC ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W912QR-13-C-0014 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59965 

Mr. Todd J. Korte 

Management Committee Representative 

Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Travis D. Van Ort, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorney 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Louisville 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 20 July 2015 

7~ rt~MCIAIL Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59965, Appeal ofMACNAK Korte Team LLC, 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
EX-10.1






EXHIBIT 10.1



FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE




THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (THE “FIRST AMENDMENT”) DATED JULY 31, 2013, SHALL AMEND THE PROMISSORY
NOTE (THE “NOTE”) DATED AS OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2011 AMONG NON-INVASIVE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. (THE
“MAKER”) AND MARIE WOLF (THE “PAYEE”) AS NOTED BELOW.



RECITALS




WHEREAS, Maker and Payee (collectively, the “Parties”) are parties to the Note which became
effective on September 12, 2011; and



WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Note to extend the Maturity Date from September 12,
2014 until July 31, 2015.



NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in the Note and
this First Amendment and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:



AMENDMENT





	 	1.	 	Section 1 of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as
follows:






The principal amount of the loan evidenced hereby, together with any accrued and
unpaid interest, and any and all unpaid costs, fees and expenses accrued, shall be
due and payable on July 31, 2015 (the “Maturity Date”).



2. Governing Law. This First Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida
without regard to its conflict of laws rules or principles.



3. Amendments. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Note shall remain unmodified and in
full force and effect.



4. Entire Agreement. This First Amendment and the Note constitute the entire agreement of the
Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior understandings and
writings between the Parties relating thereto.



5. Interpretation. Any capitalized terms used in this First Amendment but not otherwise
defined shall have the meaning provided in the Note.



6. Counterparts. This First Amendment may be executed manually, electronically in Adobe® PDF
file format, or by facsimile by the Parties, in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be
considered one and the same amendment and shall become effective when a counterpart hereof shall
have been signed by each of the Parties and delivered to the other Party.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower has duly executed this First Amendment to the Note and Security
Note as of the 31st day of July, 2013.



	 	 	 
	 	 	NON-INVASIVE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC.
	
 
	 	By: /s/ James J. Martin
	
 
	 	 
	
 
	 	Name: James J. Martin

Title: Chief Financial Officer
	Agreed and Accepted:

	 	

	By: /s/ Marie Wolf

	 	

	 

	 	

	Name: MARIE WOLF
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CyGene Laboratories, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Martin
Munzer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                                                     /s/ Martin Munzer
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Martin Munzer
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

Date:  November 24, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report of ES Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Philip Guarnieri, President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: August 12, 2010
/s/ Philip Guarnieri

Philip Guarnieri

President and Co-Chief Executive Officer
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Lee, Chief Financial Officer of Quartz Mountain
Resources Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i)      the
Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended July 31,
2014 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)      the
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 16, 2014

|       | /s/ Michael Lee         | 
|------ | ----------------------- | 
|       |                         | 
|       |                         | 
|By:    | Michael Lee             | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer | 

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
EX-10.1 - John J. Pittas Employment Agreement Amendment




EXHIBIT 10.1
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED 
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is effective as of February 16, 2013 (the "Effective Date"), by and between REMY INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and JOHN J. PITTAS (the "Employee") and amends that certain Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of August 1, 2010, as amended by the Modification of Second Amended and Restated Agreement letter dated as of January 31, 2012, and Amendment No. 2 to Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of January 31, 2013 (the “Agreement”).  In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1.Section 9(a)(v) of the Agreement is added as follows:  “all stock option, restricted stock and other equity-based incentive awards granted by the Company that were outstanding but not vested as of the Date of Termination shall become immediately vested and/or payable, as the case may be, unless the equity incentive awards are based upon satisfaction of performance criteria (not based solely on the passage of time); in which case, such equity awards shall not be forfeited as a result of such termination and otherwise will vest pursuant to their express terms, provided, however, that any such equity awards that are vested pursuant to this provision and that constitute a non-qualified deferred compensation arrangement within the meaning of Code Section 409A shall be paid or settled on the earliest date coinciding with or following the Date of Termination that does not result in a violation of or penalties under Section 409A.”
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to be effective as of the date first set forth above.
REMY INTERNATIONAL, INC.


	
				
	By:
	/s/ Shawn Pallagi
	 
	/s/ John J. Pittas

	Name:
	Shawn Pallagi
	 
	John J. Pittas

	Title:
	Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
Rail Employer Reporting Instructions

Part VII – Additional Communications About Service and Compensation Reports

Chapter 1: Annuity Estimates Operation

1

AESOP

Our Annuity Estimates Operation, commonly referred to as "AESOP", provides employers with 

annually updated annuity estimates for their employees who meet the minimum service 

requirements for annuities under the Railroad Retirement Act. The estimates are based on the 

employees' cumulative railroad service and compensation through the previous calendar year and 

assume current year eligibility for an annuity. The estimates exclude creditable military service 

and are based on the date of birth shown on Form BA-6, Certificate of Service Months and 

Compensation. If the employee's actual date of birth differs from the date shown on Form BA-6, 

the annuity estimate may be inaccurate.

Purpose

AESOP is intended for those employers that need RRB annuity estimate information to 

administer their private pension plans or for other actuarial or budgetary planning purposes. 

AESOP information should be kept private and secure and be used only for authorized purposes.

Annual Estimate Reports

The annual estimates are released in a report format in early August. The reports are available on 

paper listings, floppy disks or CD-Rom. They are sent to the person designated by the employer 

as the "AESOP" contact official on Form G-117a, Designation of Contact Official.

Requesting an AESOP Report

Employer participation in this operation is voluntary. Employers who wish to receive an 

"AESOP" report should direct their request in writing to the Chief of Compensation and 

Employer Services. Requests received by June 1 will be included in the current year's estimate 

operation. Requests received after June 1 will be held until the following year.

Individual Employee Estimates

Individual annuity estimates are always available to employees through the local field offices of 

the Railroad Retirement Board. The field offices use the Railroad Estimated Annuity Program 

(REAP) that can accurately provide estimates for individual cases. Please do not refer individuals 

to the Chief of Compensation and Employer Services or the Quality Reporting Service Center for 

annuity estimates. Employees can also acquire an estimate through the RRB Benefit Online 

Services.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 117 (Friday, June 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29262-29263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14343]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6601]


U.S. Advisory Panel to the U.S. Section of the North Pacific 
Anadromous Fish Commission; (Notice of Renewal)

    The Department of State has renewed the Charter of the U.S. 
Advisory Panel to the U.S. Section of the North Pacific Anadromous Fish 
Commission (NPAFC)

[[Page 29263]]

for another two years, effective June 12, 2009.
    The NPAFC was established by the Convention for the Conservation of 
Anadromous Stocks in the North Pacific Ocean, signed on February 12, 
1992, by Canada, Japan, the Russian Federation, and the United States, 
and entered into force on February 16, 1993. The U.S. Advisory Panel 
will continue to work with the U.S. Section to promote the conservation 
of anadromous fish stocks, particularly salmon, throughout their 
migratory range in the North Pacific Ocean, as well as ecologically 
related species.
    The U.S. Section of the Commission is composed of three 
Commissioners who are appointed by the President. Each Commissioner is 
appointed for a term not to exceed 4 years, but is eligible for 
reappointment. The Secretary of State, in consultation with the 
Secretary of Commerce, may designate alternate commissioners. The 
Advisory Panel to the U.S. Section is composed of 14 members, 11 of 
whom are appointed by the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary 
of Commerce. Advisory Panel members serve for a term not to exceed 4 
years, and may not serve more than two consecutive terms.
    The Advisory Panel will continue to follow the procedures 
prescribed by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Meetings will 
continue to be open to the public unless a determination is made in 
accordance with Section 10 of the FACA, 5 U.S.C. Secs. 552b(c)(1) and 
(4), that a meeting or a portion of the meeting should be closed to the 
public. Notice of each meeting will continue to be provided for 
publication in the Federal Register as far in advance as possible prior 
to the meeting.
    For further information on the renewal of the Advisory Panel, 
please contact John Field, Office of Marine Conservation in the 
Department of State, (202) 647-3263.

    Dated: May 5, 2009.
David A. Balton,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Oceans and Fisheries, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. E9-14343 Filed 6-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE MICHAEL GEOFFREY 

PETERS, 

RELATOR.

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00203-CR

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Michael Geoffrey Peters, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus because 

he has been incarcerated following his conviction of retaliation in the 418th District Court of 

Montgomery County, Texas. Relator’s appeal of that criminal conviction is currently pending 

before the Beaumont Court of Appeals in cause number 09-15-00166-CR, styled Michael 

Geoffrey Peters v. State of Texas. We dismiss the habeas corpus petition for lack of jurisdiction.

Relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is related exclusively to his criminal 

prosecution and conviction of retaliation. As an intermediate court of appeals, we do not have

original jurisdiction over petitions for habeas corpus relief in connection with criminal 

proceedings. See TEX.GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d)(West 2004)(habeas corpus jurisdiction of 

intermediate courts of appeals limited to civil matters); Ex parte Hawkins, 885 S.W.2d 586, 587-

88 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1994, orig. proceeding). That jurisdiction rests instead with the Court of 

Criminal Appeals, the district courts, and the county courts. TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 

11.05 (West 2015); Ex parte Hawkins, 885 S.W.2d at 587-88. Accordingly, Relator’s petition 
- 2 -

for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

July 15, 2015

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of LILM,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George I. Norman, III,
Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/   GEORGE I. NORMAN, III
--------------------------------
George I. Norman, III
Chief Executive Officer
March 29, 2007



     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.