# Patent

## Title
Modified release formulations and methods of treating inflammatory bowel disease

## Abstract

Methods and formulations for treating inflammatory bowel disease are disclosed. The methods and formulations include, but are not limited to, methods and formulations for delivering effective concentrations of 4-aminosalicylic acid and/or 5-aminosalicylic acid, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts and pro-drugs thereof, to affected areas of the intestine, i.e., distal gut. The methods and formulations comprise modified-release elements, providing for drug delivery to the affected or desired area. Diseases and conditions treatable with the present invention include Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

## Background
This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/930,743 filed Sep. 1, 2004, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/499,365 filed Sep. 3, 2003, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
This invention is directed to methods and formulations for treating inflammatory bowel disease. The methods and formulations include, but are not limited to, methods and formulations for delivering effective concentrations of 4-aminosalicylic acid and/or 5-aminosalicylic acid and pharmaceutically acceptable salts, esters and pro-drugs thereof, to affected areas of the intestine. The methods and formulations comprise conventional and/or modified-release elements, providing for drug delivery to the affected area. Diseases and conditions treatable with the methods and formulations of the present invention include Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.
Gastrointestinal conditions pose a significant worldwide health problem. Inflammatory bowel diseases, which genus encompass a range of diseases including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, affect nearly 1 million people in the United States each year.
The two most common inflammatory conditions of the intestine, ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), are collectively known as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). These conditions are diseases of the distal gut (lower small intestine, large intestine, and rectum) rather than the proximal gut (stomach and upper small intestine). Between the two, ulcerative colitis primarily affects the colon, whereas Crohn's disease affects the distal small intestine as well.
Although distinct conditions, the same drugs are commonly used to treat both UC and CD. Drugs commonly used in their treatment include steroids (e.g., budesonide and other corticosteroids, and adrenal steroids such as prednisone and hydrocortisone); cytokines such as interleukin-10; antibiotics; immunomodulating agents such as azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, cyclosporine, and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents such as soluble TNF receptor and antibodies raised to TNF; and also antinflammatory agents such as zinc. The most commonly prescribed agents for IBD include sulfasalazine (salicyl-azo-sulfapyridine, or “SASP”) and related 5-aminosalicylic acid (“5-ASA”) products.
It is recognized that SASP is broken down in the lower gut by colonic bacteria to yield sulfapyridine (“SP”) and 5-ASA, of which 5-ASA is believed to be the primary active component. 5-ASA released in the colon is poorly absorbed and is commonly believed to act locally within the cells of the distal gut.
Because SP is extensively absorbed and is associated with various side effects, investigators have proposed using 5-ASA alone as a treatment for IBD. Indeed, 5-ASA, or mesalamine, has now been established as a common treatment for IBD and is widely prescribed and used for this purpose. However, 5-ASA therapy still has problems, including side effects to be detailed hereinafter. Additionally, 5-ASA exhibits an efficacy profile that is less than maximal, reflected in high daily doses (1.5 g/day to 4 g/day), lower response and remission rates, and higher relapse rates, related to its site and mechanism of action and efficiency of delivery to the cells of the distal gut.
The administration of 5-ASA is hampered by some complications associated with its delivery. For example, the compound is unstable in gastric fluids, and its extensive absorption from the small intestine reduces its availability at distal sites in the gut, which are the sites of the therapeutic effect and the preferred sites of delivery, thereby necessitating high doses to be administered. Ideally, the compound should reach the distal gut (ileum and/or colon) in unchanged form (i.e. as the parent compound), but not be absorbed into the systemic circulation as the parent compound from there. The absorption into the systemic circulation from proximal and/or distal sites as the parent compound results in side effects associated with the absorbed drug and its systemic effects.
Once the dosage form reaches the distal gut, the compound should be released and subsequently absorbed at a rate consistent with maximal metabolism in the distal gut enterocyte. Therefore, the distal gut enterocyte (i.e., the site of action of the drug) has maximal exposure to the active form of the drug (i.e., the parent compound), thus minimizing the dose required and in addition the systemic exposure to the parent compound and its associated side effects are minimized by maximizing the pre-systemic metabolism (i.e., in the gut enterocyte).
Existing oral 5-ASA-based therapies fall into two main categories. One involves the use of pharmaceutical dosage forms based on modified-release formulations (MR), the other is pro-drug based. In relation to dosage form-based approaches, various modified release forms have been developed and described. Both extended/sustained release formulations and delayed release formulations have been developed, with the intent of limiting 5-ASA release in the upper gut and concentrating its release in the distal gut.
For example, a sustained release formulation (PENTASA®) has been approved and used for many years. PENTASA® releases 5-ASA continuously, with approximately 50% released in the small intestine and 50% available for release in the large intestine, and in its approved label form reports 20-30% systemic absorption. This absorption reflects the proximal release and absorption characteristics of this formulation in addition to any low level absorption from the distal gut, as in the distal gut, 5-ASA is incompletely released from PENTASA®and poorly absorbed. See PDR datasheet for PENTASA®. In addition, this absorption reflects the systemic exposure to both unchanged 5-ASA (approximately 17% of absorbed drug) and its acetylated metabolite (approximately 83% of absorbed drug). The relatively high proportion of 5-ASA being absorbed as parent compound reflects either absorption from the small intestine, where gut metabolism is limited, and/or the release of drug from the formulation in the distal gut at a rate which is greater than the rate at which saturation of metabolism in the gut enterocyte occurs. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,496,553, 4,880,794, 4,980,173, and 5,041,431 are all directed to extended release forms of 5-ASA or its salts or esters.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,840,332 describes a GI delivery system that achieves the desired location of release of 5-ASA in the intestine through the inclusion of particulate water-insoluble material embedded in a water-insoluble coating on a drug-containing core. U.S. Pat. No. 6,004,581 describes a multiparticulate spherical-granule-containing formulation that provides for a modified and targeted release of 5-ASA, particularly to the small and large bowel. In all of these cases, however, the fundamental problems of proximal release limiting the maximum local efficacy, and resulting in significant side effects related to the systemic absorption of unchanged 5-ASA, have not been overcome.
Other approaches rely on a pH-dependent coating to achieve the desired release. For example, an enteric-coated commercial product, ASACOL®, relies on a pH-dependent acrylic-based barrier coating, which dissolves at pH values above 7, to achieve a distal 5-ASA delivery. Other examples of this type of formulation are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,541,170 and 5,541,171, which describe a solid dosage form of 5-ASA, or its salts or esters, that achieves delivery to the large intestine through a coating that is insoluble in gastric and intestinal conditions (less than pH 7) but soluble in the colon (pH greater than 7).
The drawback of formulations such as these is that the regional gut pH can vary significantly from one person to the next, and can be influenced by the presence of food, or other conditions. In fact, diseases such as IBD can themselves cause intestinal pH to vary. The package information for ASACOL® states that its systemic absorption is as high as 28%, of which approximately 20% of absorbed drug is in the systemic circulation as unchanged drug and approximately 80% of absorbed drug is in the systemic circulation as metabolite. Because absorption is mainly in the small intestine, with some low level absorption from the distal gut, due to the solubility and absorption characteristics of 5-ASA at this site, the relatively high systemic absorption of parent drug suggests a significant variability in ASACOL®'s site of release and/or the release of 5-ASA from the formulation in the distal gut at a rate which is greater than the rate at which saturation of metabolism in the gut enterocyte occurs.
In general, pH-dependent systems for targeting 5-ASA release to a specific location in the intestine can be unreliable for a number of reasons. For example, premature release and associated systemic absorption of the parent compound may result from a proximal intestinal pH at or above the critical triggering pH. Alternatively, incomplete or minimal release may result from the occurrence of the critical pH at a site distal of the affected area. Nugent et al, Gut 48, pages 571-577 (2001), reviews the potential problems of the pH-dependent distal gut delivery approach, pointing out that the existence of inter-subject variations in intestinal pH. These problems have led to proposed improvements in targeting the delivery of 5-ASA to the distal gut.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,716,648 describes an oral composition that relies on a pH-dependent soluble coating, but also includes a pH-regulating alkaline material to attempt to compensate for patients with “subnormal intestinal pH.” Other approaches include those described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,866,619, which is generally directed to a non-pH-dependent colonic drug-delivery system involving a saccharide-containing polymer, which is enzymatically degraded by the colon. Another example is provided by U.S. Pat. No. 6,506,407, which generally describes a colon-specific drug-releasing system that combines a pH-dependent outer coating with the inclusion of a saccharide substrate, which upon enzymatic breakdown by enterobacteria produces an organic acid that subsequently dissolves an acid-soluble inner coating.
Still other examples are described in U.S. Application No. 2002/0098235, which describes the use of multiple pH-dependent coatings to reduce the impact of coating fractures. U.S. Application No. 2001/0055616 describes a pellet formulation for treating intestinal tract conditions, which utilizes a pH-dependent enteric coating to target release from a non-gel-forming drug-containing polymeric matrix core. U.S. Application 2001/0036473 describes a pH-dependent coating on a hydroxypropylmethylcellulose capsule for enteric and colonic delivery. And U.S. Application No. 2001/0026807 describes various coatings, including pH-dependent materials, redox-sensitive materials, and materials subject to breakdown by bacteria, on a starch capsule to achieve colonic delivery.
Despite the descriptions of proposed improvements in these documents, a distal gut or colonic 5-ASA-delivery system that does not suffer from the variability in inter-subject intestinal pH is still not commercially available. In addition, where delivery of 5-ASA to the distal gut is achieved, the release of drug from the formulation is incomplete, due to the solubility characteristics of 5-ASA and the limited medium in which to dissolve it in the distal gut. Also, the absorption of drug at the distal gut (the site of action of the drug) is poor and at a rate which is greater than the rate at which saturation of the enterocyte metabolizing enzymes occurs. This results in a large proportion of unchanged 5-ASA being absorbed through the distal gut and entering the systemic circulation. Systemic exposure to the unchanged form of 5-ASA results in the unwanted side effects of these treatments. Thus, the inherent difficulties in 5-ASA delivery have yet to be solved in a commercially acceptable manner.
A compound related to, but more stable than 5-ASA, is 4-ASA, also known as para-aminosalicylic acid. Like 5-ASA, 4-ASA is effective in treating IBD, although it has never been approved in oral form for such a use. It has been approved for use in certain European countries as a rectal enema, i.e., QUADRAS® by Norgine. Since the 1940's, 4-ASA has also been used as an oral preparation for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB).
Para-aminosalicylic acid has certain advantages over 5-ASA in treating IBD. For example, 4-ASA has a higher aqueous stability. In addition to its higher aqueous stability, it reportedly exhibits an absence of nephrotoxicity, and based on extensive experience and use at daily doses as high as 8-12 g in the treatment of TB, 4-ASA appears to be safe and generally well tolerated. Ginsberg et al., Gastroenterology 102, 448-452, 1998.
As an approved form for use in TB, 4-ASA is commonly presented as an enteric formulation in order to minimize the degradation of the drug in the stomach. Modified release oral dosage forms of 4-ASA for use in TB have also been described. Because absorption of the 4-ASA is important in TB treatment, such formulations are designed to maximize 4-ASA absorption from the proximal gut.
Unlike the situation with 5-ASA, modified-release oral dosage forms of 4-ASA for use in IBD have not been widely described. U.S. Pat. No. 5,716,648 does describe an oral composition for 4-ASA in treating IBD. This disclosure, however, is directed specifically to pharmaceutical oral compositions that include a pH regulating alkaline material to deal with subnormal gut pH.
In addition to targeting IBD with modified-release 5-ASA products, IBD has been targeted with pro-drugs that are self-targeting. For example, olsalazine, which is formed from two molecules of 5-ASA linked by an azo-bond (5,5′-azo-bis salicylic acid), naturally targets the colon. It is stable in gastric conditions, thus able to bypass the stomach, and is minimally absorbed intact from the gut (2.4%). However, a major side effect of olsalazine is diarrhea, reported in 12-25% of patients. Suggested mechanisms for this side effect include enhancement of ileal water and electrolyte secretion and/or inhibition of ileal bile acid transport. Both of these effects would occur as a result of direct exposure of the ileum to the olsalazine molecule.
Olsalazine is rapidly converted to two molecules of 5-ASA in the colon through the action of colonic bacteria. This mechanism inherently delivers 5-ASA to the desired site of action. The marketed form of olsalazine, DIPENTUM®, is a simple non-modified-release powder-filled capsule or compressed tablet. In addition to the side effect of diarrhea, another problem with this formulation is that the entire dose is exposed to the action of the intestinal enzymes upon entering the colon. Thus, upon entering the colon, all of the olsalazine is cleaved into 5-ASA, essentially providing a bolus dose to a concentrated area in the proximal colon. After a fairly substantial absorption (approximately 20%), of which 12% of the absorbed drug enters the systemic circulation as parent drug and 88% of the absorbed drug enters the systemic circulation as metabolite, the remainder of the bolus dose is then left to transit throughout the colon, and be excreted in the feces. In addition, the relatively high proportion of drug which enters the systemic circulation as parent drug (i.e., as a result of the drug being presented to the gut enterocyte metabolizing enzymes at a rate which is greater than that at which saturation occurs) is associated with side effects.
Because olsalazine is self-targeting to the colon, there has been little focus on modified release forms of olsalazine or other bis-azo ASA pro-drug forms. U.S. Patent Application No. 2002/0192282 describes a multilayer pharmaceutical formulation for release of various drugs, including olsalazine, in the colon and includes a pH-dependent outer coating layer. The problem with such a formulation was described above with respect to other pH-dependent formulations: because of the potential variability in the pH of the gut, these systems may not properly release at affected sites due to distal gut pH values below the critical value. These formulations, moreover, do not take into account the rate of saturation of metabolism and hence do not minimize the systemic exposure to parent drug.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,374,932 describes a drug delivery system for 5,5′-azo-bis salicylic acid designed to bypass absorption of the 5,5′-azo-bis salicylic acid entity in the stomach and small intestine, and utilize an ion-exchange complex of diacidic 5,5′-azo-bis salicylic acid and an anionic exchange resin. However, the absorption of olsalazine from the conventional powder capsule already results in only 2.4% absorption, and thus this formulation does not provide an important therapeutic advantage.
In view of the foregoing, there remains a need in the art for methods and pharmaceutical formulations that can be used to deliver 4-ASA and/or 5-ASA and/or pro-drugs thereof in therapeutically effective concentrations to affected areas of the gastrointestinal tract at a rate which minimizes the systemic exposure to the parent drug. The present invention proposes solutions to at least one of these problems identified in the art, and provides such methods and formulations.
This invention is advantageous in providing methods and formulations for treating inflammatory bowel disease. The invention proposes delivering effective concentrations of 4-ASA and/or 5-ASA and pro-drugs thereof to affected areas of the gastrointestinal tract, with minimized systemic absorption of parent drug. The invention is directed to, among other things, a pharmaceutical composition for administration to a subject in need thereof comprising a dose of an aminosalicylate active agent chosen from 4-amino salicylic acid, 5-amino salicylic acid, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts, esters and pro-drugs thereof, and at least one pharmaceutically acceptable excipient, wherein the composition exhibits:

    
    
        (a) a drug-release profile that is independent of surrounding pH and
        (b) a dissolution profile, when tested in a U.S.P. Type II apparatus (paddles) at 37° C. and 50 rpm, in pH 6.8 buffer for the test:
        
            1 hour: less than or equal to about 20% drug released;
            2 hours: less than or equal to about 35% drug released;
            3 hours: less than or equal to about 50% drug released;
            4 hours: less than or equal to about 60% drug released;
            6 hours: less than or equal to about 75% drug released; and
            12 hours: from about 25% to about 100% drug released; and
        
        
        wherein upon administration, the composition exhibits:
        (c) at least one ratio chosen from a total urine recovery or total plasma (AUC) ratio of metabolite of the active agent to the active agent greater than or equal to 10:1, and a Cmax ratio of metabolite of the active agent to the active agent greater than or equal to 5:1; and
        
            (d) from greater than 30% to about 100% of the dose of the active agent excreted in the urine as metabolite of the active agent and the active agent.
        
        
    
    


In some embodiments, the pharmaceutically acceptable excipient is chosen from carriers, fillers, extenders, binders, humectants, disintegrating agents, solution-retarding agents, absorption accelerators, wetting agents, absorbents, lubricants, stabilizers, coloring agents, buffering agents, dispersing agents, preservatives, organic acids, and organic bases.
The modified-release compositions of the invention may comprise an immediate-release core and a semi-permeable membrane. In some embodiments, the modified-release compositions of the invention may comprise a modified-release matrix core and a semi-permeable membrane. In some embodiments, the aminosalicylate active agent is chosen from 4-aminosalicylic acid and 5-aminosalicylic acid, or at least one pharmaceutically acceptable salt or ester thereof. In some embodiments, the composition comprises 4-aminosalicylic acid and 5-aminosalicylic acid, or pharmaceutically acceptable salts or esters thereof. In some embodiments, the aminosalicylate active agent is chosen from 5,5′-azo-bis salicylic acid, 4,5′-azo-bis salicylic acid, 4,4′-azo-bis salicylic acid, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof.
The invention also includes methods of treating inflammatory bowel disease comprising administering to a subject in need thereof a pharmaceutical composition comprising a dose of an aminosalicylate active agent chosen from 4-amino salicylic acid, 5-amino salicylic acid, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts, esters and pro-drugs thereof, and at least one pharmaceutically acceptable excipient, wherein the composition exhibits:

    
    
        (a) a drug-release profile that is independent of surrounding pH and
        (b) a dissolution profile, when tested in a U.S.P. Type II apparatus (paddles) at 37° C. and 50 rpm, in pH 6.8 buffer for the test:
        
            1 hour: less than or equal to about 20% drug released;
            2 hours: less than or equal to about 35% drug released;
            3 hours: less than or equal to about 50% drug released;
            4 hours: less than or equal to about 60% drug released;
            6 hours: less than or equal to about 75% drug released; and
            12 hours: from about 25% to about 100% drug released; and
        
        
        wherein upon administration, the composition exhibits:
        (c) at least one ratio chosen from a total urine recovery or total plasma (AUC) ratio of metabolite of the active agent to the active agent greater than or equal to 10:1, and a Cmax ratio of metabolite of the active agent to the active agent greater than or equal to 5:1; and
        
            (d) from greater than 30% to about 100% of the dose of the active agent excreted in the urine as metabolite of the active agent and the active agent.
        
        
    
    


It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following more detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.
This invention relates to formulations and methods for treating inflammatory bowel disease. The term “inflammatory bowel disease” includes, but is not limited to, ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Other diseases contemplated for treatment or prevention by the present invention include non-ulcerative colitis, and carcinomas, polyps, and/or cysts of the colon and/or rectum. All of these diseases fall within the scope of the term “inflammatory bowel disease” as used in this specification, yet the invention does not require the inclusion of each recited member. Thus, for example, the invention may be directed to the treatment of Crohn's disease, to the exclusion of all the other members; or to ulcerative colitis, to the exclusion of all the other members; or to any single disease or condition, or combination of diseases or conditions, to the exclusion of any other single disease or condition, or combination of diseases or conditions.
The inventive formulations and methods provide for the delivery of effective concentrations of 4-ASA and/or 5-ASA to the desired or affected area, e.g., the distal small intestine and/or colon, of the intestinal tract. The invention includes modified-release formulations of 4-ASA and/or 5-ASA, including formulations that exhibit delayed- and/or extended-release characteristics.
In other embodiments, formulations include a “pro-drug” of 4-ASA and/or 5-ASA. As used herein, the term “pro-drug” means any compound or composition that yields an active agent at some point following administration. Thus, for example, a pro-drug of 4-ASA is one that yields 4-ASA; a pro-drug of 5-ASA, or a 5-ASA pro-drug, is one that yields 5-ASA. There is no requirement that the pro-drug itself be inactive—in some instances the pro-drug can be active, and yet still yield a different active agent. There is also no requirement that a pro-drug yield only one active agent—a pro-drug may yield two or more active agents, and the yielded agents may be the same or different. Examples of pro-drugs useful in accordance with this invention include, but are not limited to, sulfasalazine, which yields 5-ASA in the colon, and olsalazine, which comprises two molecules of 5-ASA linked by an azo-bond, i.e., 5,5′-azo-bis-salicylic acid, and yields two molecules of 5-ASA.
Olsalazine, as discussed above, has the advantage of being stable in gastric conditions and being minimally absorbed intact from the gut (2.4%). Direct exposure of the ileum to the olsalazine molecule, however, results in a high incidence of diarrhea. Olsalazine is rapidly converted to two molecules of 5-ASA in the colon through the action of colonic bacteria. This is the same mechanism by which 5-ASA is formed from sulfasalazine in the colon.
The modified-release formulations of the current invention are directed to modifying the release of, for example, olsalazine so that the pro-drug is not released in the ileum and the cleavage of 5-ASA from olsalazine in the colon occurs at a slow and controlled manner. The advantages of this new approach are protecting the ileum from direct exposure to the olsalazine molecule and reducing the rapid and extensive conversion of olsalazine to 5-ASA by the action of the colonic bacteria and the low prevailing redox potential. Whereas DIPENTUM® (commercially available form of olsalazine) has a high incidence of diarrhea and also results in a high local concentration of 5-ASA in the distal gut, resulting in systemic absorption of unchanged 5-ASA (approximately 12% of absorbed drug) due to the saturation of metabolizing enzymes in the enterocyte, the modified-release formulations of the current invention, by preventing release of the pro-drug in the ileum and regulating the rate at which the pro-drug is made available for conversion and thereby for formation of the active moiety and presentation to enzymes in the enterocyte, overcome at least one of these problems and provide for a safer and more effective form.
In addition to olsalazine, the present invention is also directed to the use of 4,5′-azo-bis salicylic acid, described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,591,584, which is converted in the distal gut to both 4-ASA and 5-ASA. Also included within the scope of this invention is 4,4′-azo-bis salicylic acid, which has not been described previously as an agent for treating IBD. This form will be converted exclusively to 4-ASA and can be administered in both un-modified and modified-release forms. Modified-release formulations of 5,5′ azo-bis, 5,4′ azo-bis, 4,4′ azo-bis, and combinations thereof, are also within the scope of this invention. In fact, the inventors expressly contemplate the use of any pro-drugs that yield 4-ASA and/or 5-ASA.
In this regard, reference is made to U.S. Pat. No. 6,602,915, directed to therapeutic azo-compounds for drug delivery. This patent is generally directed to polymers of azo-compounds, including polymers of azo-linked 4-ASA and polymers of azo-linked 5-ASA. The use of such polymers, and formulations containing them, is within the scope of the present invention.
Balsalazide is a commercially available pro-drug of 5-ASA that is cleaved in the colon to release 5-ASA together with a largely unabsorbed and inert moiety, 4-aminobenzoyl-beta-alanine. U.S. Pat. No. 6,458,776 describes a derivative of 5-ASA that, upon reduction of the azo bond in the colon, releases both 5-ASA and a non-absorbable antibiotic. These pro-drug compounds are also within the scope of the present invention, and can be formulated as modified-release formulations according to the invention.
Indeed, the present invention is not limited to any of the particular azo-bis compounds described herein. The present invention extends to the use and formulation of any azo-bis compound that yields either 4-ASA and/or 5-ASA. Modified-release formulations of any such azo-bis compound are specifically contemplated. Thus, as used herein in association with the present invention, the term “drug” refers to compounds useful in treating IBD or other diseases according to this invention, including but not limited to SASP, 5-ASA, and/or 4-ASA; the term “pro-drug” refers to any compound that yields such drugs, including but not limited to olsalazine, balzalazine, and/or any other azo-containing compound that yields such drug or drugs.
As used herein, the term “modified-release” formulation or dosage form includes pharmaceutical preparations that achieve a desired release of the drug from the formulation. A modified-release formulation can be designed to modify the manner in which the active ingredient is exposed to the desired target. For example, a modified-release formulation can be designed to focus the delivery of the active agent entirely in the distal large intestine, beginning at the cecum, and continuing through the ascending, transverse, and descending colon, and ending in the sigmoid colon. Alternatively, for example, a modified-release composition can be designed to focus the delivery of the drug in the proximal small intestine, beginning at the duodenum and ending at the ileum. In still other examples, the modified-release formulations can be designed to begin releasing active agent in the jejunum and end their release in the transverse colon. The possibilities and combinations are numerous, and are clearly not limited to these examples.
The term “modified-release” encompasses “extended-release” and “delayed-release” formulations, as well as formulations having both extended-release and delayed-release characteristics. An “extended-release” formulation can extend the period over which drug is released or targeted to the desired site. A “delayed-release” formulation can be designed to delay the release of the pharmaceutically active compound for a specified period. Such formulations are referred to herein as “delayed-release” or “delayed-onset” formulations or dosage forms. Modified-release formulations of the present invention include those that exhibit both a delayed- and extended-release, e.g., formulations that only begin releasing after a fixed period of time or after a physicochemical change has occurred, for example, then continue releasing over an extended period.
As used herein, the term “immediate-release formulation,” is meant to describe those formulations in which more than about 50% of active ingredient is released from the dosage form in less than about 2 hours. Such formulations are also referred to herein as “conventional formulations.”
As used herein, the phrase “drug-release profile that is independent of surrounding pH” means effectively a drug composition comprising a polymeric system that is non-enteric or whose permeability and solubility properties do not change with environmental, i.e., external, pH. Meaning, a drug composition having release characteristics (e.g., dissolution) substantially unaffected by pH or regardless of pH-changes in the environment. This is in comparison to a release profile that is pH-dependent where the release characteristics (e.g., dissolution) vary according to the pH of the environment.
The formulations of the present invention are intended to include formulations that are generic to treating all forms of IBD, and thus target their contents to both the distal small intestine and the large intestine. Other formulations within the scope of the invention include those that are more specifically designed for treating a specific disease. For example, a formulation for treating ulcerative colitis can be designed to deliver its contents entirely to the colon.
The formulations of the present invention can exist as multi-unit or single-unit formulations. The term “multi-unit” as used herein means a plurality of discrete or aggregated particles, beads, pellets, granules, tablets, or mixtures thereof, for example, without regard to their size, shape, or morphology. Single-unit formulations include, for example, tablets, caplets, and pills.
The methods and formulations of the present invention are intended to encompass all possible combinations of components that exhibit modified-release and immediate-release properties. For example, a formulation and/or method of the invention can contain components that exhibit extended-release and immediate-release properties, or both delayed-release and immediate-release properties, or both extended-release and delayed-release properties, or a combination of all three properties. For example, a multiparticulate formulation including both immediate-release and extended-release components can be combined in a capsule, which is then coated with an enteric coat to provide a delayed-release effect. Or, for example, a delayed- and extended-release caplet may comprise a plurality of discrete extended-release particles held together with a binder in the caplet, which is coated with an enteric coating to create a delay in dissolution.
The modifications in the rates of release, such as to create a delay or extension in release, can be achieved in any number of ways. Mechanisms can be dependent or independent of local pH in the intestine, and can also rely on local enzymatic activity to achieve the desired effect. Examples of modified-release formulations are known in the art and are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,845,770; 3,916,899; 3,536,809; 3,598,123; 4,008,719; 5,674,533; 5,059,595; 5,591,767; 5,120,548; 5,073,543; 5,639,476; 5,354,556; and 5,733,566.
A number of modified dosage forms suitable for use are described below. A more detailed discussion of such forms can also be found in, for example The Handbook of Pharmaceutical Controlled Release Technology, D. L. Wise (ed.), Marcel Decker, Inc., New York (2000); and also in Treatise on Controlled Drug Delivery: Fundamentals, Optimization, and Applications, A. Kydonieus (ed.), Marcel Decker, Inc., New York, (1992), the relevant contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference for this purpose. Examples of modified-release formulations include but are not limited to, membrane-modified, matrix, osmotic, and ion-exchange systems. All of these can be in the form of single-unit or multi-unit dosage forms, as alluded to above.
With membrane-modified extended-release dosage forms, a semi-permeable membrane can surround the formulation containing the active substance of interest. Semi-permeable membranes include those that are permeable to a greater or lesser extent to both water and solute. This membrane can include water-insoluble and/or water-soluble polymers, and can exhibit pH-dependent and/or pH-independent solubility characteristics. Polymers of these types are described in detail below. Generally, the characteristics of the polymeric membrane, which may be determined by, e.g., the composition of the membrane, will determine the nature of release from the dosage form.
Matrix-Based Dosage Forms
Matrix-type systems comprise an aminosalicylate active agent, mixed with either water-soluble, e.g., hydrophilic polymers, or water-insoluble, e.g., hydrophobic polymers. Generally, the properties of the polymer used in a modified-release dosage form will affect the mechanism of release. For example, the release of the active agent from a dosage form containing a hydrophilic polymer can proceed via both surface diffusion and/or erosion. Mechanisms of release from pharmaceutical systems are well known to those skilled in the art. Matrix-type systems can also be monolithic or multiunit, and can be coated with water-soluble and/or water-insoluble polymeric membranes, examples which are described above.
Matrix formulations of the present invention can be prepared by using, for example, direct compression or wet granulation. A functional coating, as noted above, can then be applied in accordance with the invention. Additionally, a barrier or sealant coat can be applied over a matrix tablet core prior to application of a functional coating. The barrier or sealant coat can serve the purpose of separating an active ingredient from a functional coating, which can interact with the active ingredient, or it can prevent moisture from contacting the active ingredient. Details of barriers and sealants are provided below.
In a matrix-based dosage form in accordance with the present invention, the drug and/or pro-drug and optional pharmaceutically acceptable excipient(s) are dispersed within a polymeric matrix, which typically comprises one or more water-soluble polymers and/or one or more water-insoluble polymers. The drug can be released from the dosage form by diffusion and/or erosion. Wise and Kydonieus describe such matrix systems in detail.
Suitable water-soluble polymers include, but are not limited to, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, methylcellulose, hydroxypropylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, or polyethylene glycol, and/or mixtures thereof.
Suitable water-insoluble polymers also include, but are not limited to, ethylcellulose, cellulose acetate, cellulose propionate, cellulose acetate propionate, cellulose acetate butyrate, cellulose acetate phthalate, cellulose triacetate, poly (methyl methacrylate), poly (ethyl methacrylate), poly (butyl methacrylate), poly (isobutyl methacrylate), and poly (hexyl methacrylate), poly (isodecyl methacrylate), poly (lauryl methacrylate), poly (phenyl methacrylate), poly (methyl acrylate), poly (isopropyl acrylate), poly (isobutyl acrylate), poly (octadecyl acrylate), poly (ethylene), poly (ethylene) low density, poly (ethylene) high density, poly (ethylene oxide), poly (ethylene terephthalate), poly (vinyl isobutyl ether), poly (vinyl acetate), poly (vinyl chloride) or polyurethane, and/or mixtures thereof.
Suitable pharmaceutically acceptable excipients include, but are not limited to, carriers, such as sodium citrate and dicalcium phosphate; fillers or extenders, such as stearates, silicas, gypsum, starches, lactose, sucrose, glucose, mannitol, talc, and silicic acid; binders, such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, hydroxymethyl-cellulose, alginates, gelatin, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, sucrose, and acacia; humectants, such as glycerol; disintegrating agents, such as agar, calcium carbonate, potato and tapioca starch, alginic acid, certain silicates, EXPLOTABTM, crospovidone, and sodium carbonate; solution retarding agents, such as paraffin; absorption accelerators, such as quaternary ammonium compounds; wetting agents, such as cetyl alcohol and glycerol monostearate; absorbents, such as kaolin and bentonite clay; lubricants, such as talc, calcium stearate, magnesium stearate, solid polyethylene glycols, and sodium lauryl sulfate; stabilizers, such as fumaric acid; coloring agents; buffering agents; dispersing agents; preservatives; organic acids; and organic bases. The aforementioned excipients are given as examples only and are not meant to include all possible choices. Additionally, many excipients can have more than one role or function, or can be classified in more than one group; the classifications are descriptive only, and are not intended to limit any use of a particular excipient.
In one example, a matrix-based dosage form can comprise the drug or pro-drug, a filler, such as starch, lactose, or microcrystalline cellulose (AVICELTM); a binder/controlled-release polymer, such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose or polyvinyl pyrrolidone; a disintegrant, such as EXPLOTABTM, crospovidone, or starch; a lubricant, such as magnesium stearate or stearic acid; a surfactant, such as sodium lauryl sulfate or polysorbates; and a glidant, such as colloidal silicon dioxide (AEROSILTM) or talc.
The amounts and types of polymers, and the ratio of water-soluble polymers to water-insoluble polymers in the inventive formulations are generally selected to achieve a desired release profile of the drug or pro-drug, as described below. For example, by increasing the amount of water insoluble-polymer relative to the amount of water soluble-polymer, the release of the drug can be delayed or slowed. This is due, in part, to an increased impermeability of the polymeric matrix, and, in some cases, to a decreased rate of erosion during transit through the gastrointestinal tract.
Of course, matrix-based dosage forms may be coated with a diffusion-control membrane, such as a semi-permeable or selectively permeable membrane. Indeed, many of the formulation components described herein can be used in combination: instant release cores with diffusion-controlled membranes or matrix cores with diffusion-controlled membranes, for example.
Osmotic Pump Dosage Forms
In another embodiment, the modified-release formulations of the present invention are provided as osmotic pump dosage forms. In an osmotic pump dosage form, a core containing an aminosalicylate active agent and optionally, at least one osmotic excipient is typically encased by a selectively permeable membrane having at least one orifice. The selectively permeable membrane is generally permeable to water, but impermeable to the drug. When the system is exposed to body fluids, water penetrates through the selectively permeable membrane into the core containing the drug and optional osmotic excipients. The osmotic pressure increases within the dosage form. Consequently, the drug is released through the orifice(s) in an attempt to equalize the osmotic pressure across the selectively permeable membrane.
In more complex pumps, the dosage form can contain two internal compartments in the core. The first compartment contains the drug and the second compartment can contain a polymer, which swells on contact with aqueous fluid. After ingestion, this polymer swells into the drug-containing compartment, diminishing the volume occupied by the drug, thereby forcing the drug from the device at a controlled rate over an extended period of time. Such dosage forms are often used when a zero order release profile is desired.
Osmotic pumps are well known in the art. For example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,088,864, 4,200,098, and 5,573,776, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference for this purpose, describe osmotic pumps and methods of their manufacture. Osmotic pumps of the present invention can be formed by compressing a tablet of an osmotically active drug, or an osmotically inactive drug in combination with an osmotically active agent, and then coating the tablet with a selectively permeable membrane which is permeable to an exterior aqueous-based fluid but impermeable to the drug and/or osmotic agent.
One or more delivery orifices can be drilled through the selectively permeable membrane wall. Alternatively, one or more orifices in the wall can be formed by incorporating leachable pore-forming materials in the wall. In operation, the exterior aqueous-based fluid is imbibed through the selectively permeable membrane wall and contacts the drug to form a solution or suspension of the drug. The drug solution or suspension is then pumped out through the orifice, as fresh fluid is imbibed through the selectively permeable membrane.
Typical materials for the selectively permeable membrane include, for example, selectively permeable polymers known in the art to be useful in osmosis and reverse osmosis membranes, such as cellulose acylate, cellulose diacylate, cellulose triacylate, cellulose acetate, cellulose diacetate, cellulose triacetate, agar acetate, amylose triacetate, beta glucan acetate, acetaldehyde dimethyl acetate, cellulose acetate ethyl carbamate, polyamides, polyurethanes, sulfonated polystyrenes, cellulose acetate phthalate, cellulose acetate methyl carbamate, cellulose acetate succinate, cellulose acetate dimethyl aminoacetate, cellulose acetate ethyl carbamate, cellulose acetate chloracetate, cellulose dipalmitate, cellulose dioctanoate, cellulose dicaprylate, cellulose dipentanate, cellulose acetate valerate, cellulose acetate succinate, cellulose propionate succinate, methyl cellulose, cellulose acetate ptoluene sulfonate, cellulose acetate butyrate, lightly cross-linked polystyrene derivatives, cross-linked poly(sodium styrene sulfonate), poly(vinylbenzyltrimethyl ammonium chloride), cellulose acetate, cellulose diacetate, cellulose triacetate, and/or mixtures thereof.
The at least one osmotic excipient that can be used in the pump is typically soluble in the fluid that enters the device following administration, resulting in an osmotic pressure gradient across the selectively permeable wall against the exterior fluid. Suitable osmotic excipients include, but are not limited to, magnesium sulfate, calcium sulfate, magnesium chloride, sodium chloride, lithium chloride, potassium sulfate, sodium carbonate, sodium sulfite, lithium sulfate, potassium chloride, sodium sulfate, D-mannitol, urea, sorbitol, inositol, raffinose, sucrose, glucose, hydrophilic polymers such as cellulose polymers, and/or mixtures thereof.
As discussed above, the osmotic pump dosage form can contain a second compartment containing a swellable polymer. Suitable swellable polymers typically interact with water and/or aqueous biological fluids, which causes them to swell or expand to an equilibrium state. Acceptable polymers exhibit the ability to swell in water and/or aqueous biological fluids, retaining a significant portion of such imbibed fluids within their polymeric structure, so as to increase the hydrostatic pressure within the dosage form. The polymers can swell or expand to a very high degree, usually exhibiting a 2- to 50-fold volume increase. The polymers can be non-cross-linked or cross-linked. In one embodiment, the swellable polymers are hydrophilic polymers.
Suitable polymers include, but are not limited to, poly (hydroxy alkyl methacrylate) having a molecular weight of from 30,000 to 5,000,000; kappa-carrageenan; polyvinylpyrrolidone having a molecular weight of from 10,000 to 360,000; anionic and cationic hydrogels; polyelectrolyte complexes; poly (vinyl alcohol) having low amounts of acetate, cross-linked with glyoxal, formaldehyde, or glutaraldehyde, and having a degree of polymerization from 200 to 30,000; a mixture including methyl cellulose, cross-linked agar and carboxymethyl cellulose; a water-insoluble, water-swellable copolymer produced by forming a dispersion of finely divided maleic anhydride with styrene, ethylene, propylene, butylene or isobutylene; water-swellable polymers of N-vinyl lactams; and/or mixtures of any of the foregoing.
The term “orifice” as used herein comprises means and methods suitable for releasing the drug from the dosage form. The expression includes one or more apertures or orifices that have been bored through the selectively permeable membrane by mechanical procedures. Alternatively, an orifice can be formed by incorporating an erodible element, such as a gelatin plug, in the selectively permeable membrane. In such cases, the pores of the selectively permeable membrane form a “passageway” for the passage of the drug. Such “passageway” formulations are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,845,770 and 3,916,899, the relevant disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference for this purpose.
The osmotic pumps useful in accordance with this invention can be manufactured by known techniques. For example, the drug and other ingredients can be milled together and pressed into a solid having the desired dimensions (e.g., corresponding to the first compartment). The swellable polymer is then formed, placed in contact with the drug, and both are surrounded with the selectively permeable agent. If desired, the drug component and polymer component can be pressed together before applying the selectively permeable membrane. The selectively permeable membrane can be applied by any suitable method, for example, by molding, spraying, or dipping.
Membrane-Modified Dosage Forms
The modified-release formulations of the present invention can also be provided as membrane modified formulations. Membrane-modified formulations of the present invention can be made by preparing a rapid release core, which can be a monolithic (e.g., tablet) or multi-unit (e.g., pellet) type, and coating the core with a membrane. The membrane-modified core can then be further coated with a functional coating. In between the membrane-modified core and functional coating, a barrier or sealant can be applied. Details of membrane-modified dosage forms are provided below.
For example, the aminosalicylate active agent, i.e., the drug or pro-drug, can be provided in a multiparticulate membrane-modified formulation. The drug or pro-drug can be formed into an active core by applying the compound to a nonpareil seed having an average diameter in the range of about 0.4 to about 1.1 mm, or about 0.85 to about 1 mm. The drug or pro-drug can be applied with or without additional excipients onto the inert cores, and can be sprayed from solution or suspension using a fluidized bed coater (e.g., Wurster coating) or pan coating system. Alternatively, the drug or pro-drug can be applied as a powder onto the inert cores using a binder to bind the drug or pro-drug onto the cores. Active cores can also be formed by extrusion of the core with suitable plasticizers (described below) and any other processing aids as necessary.
The modified-release formulations of the present invention comprise at least one polymeric material, which can be applied as a membrane coating to the drug-containing cores. Suitable water-soluble polymers include, but are not limited to, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, methylcellulose, hydroxypropylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose, or polyethylene glycol, and/or mixtures thereof.
Suitable water-insoluble polymers include, but are not limited to, ethylcellulose, cellulose acetate, cellulose propionate, cellulose acetate propionate, cellulose acetate butyrate, cellulose acetate phthalate, cellulose triacetate, poly (methyl methacrylate), poly (ethyl methacrylate), poly (butyl methacrylate), poly (isobutyl methacrylate), and poly (hexyl methacrylate), poly (isodecyl methacrylate), poly (lauryl methacrylate), poly (phenyl methacrylate), poly (methyl acrylate), poly (isopropyl acrylate), poly (isobutyl acrylate), poly (octadecyl acrylate), poly (ethylene), poly (ethylene) low density, poly (ethylene) high density, poly (ethylene oxide), poly (ethylene terephthalate), poly (vinyl isobutyl ether), poly (vinyl acetate), poly (vinyl chloride), or polyurethane, and/or mixtures thereof.
EUDRAGITTM polymers (available from Rohm Pharma) are polymeric lacquer substances based on acrylates and/or methacrylates. A suitable polymer that is freely permeable to the active ingredient and water is EUDRAGITTM RL. A suitable polymer that is slightly permeable to the active ingredient and water is EUDRAGITTM RS. Other suitable polymers which are slightly permeable to the active ingredient and water, and exhibit a pH-dependent permeability include, but are not limited to, EUDRAGITTM L, EUDRAGITTM S, and EUDRAGITTM E.
EUDRAGITTM RL and RS are acrylic resins comprising copolymers of acrylic and methacrylic acid esters with a low content of quaternary ammonium groups. The ammonium groups are present as salts and give rise to the permeability of the lacquer films. EUDRAGITTM RL and RS are freely permeable (RL) and slightly permeable (RS), respectively, independent of pH. The polymers swell in water and digestive juices, in a pH-independent manner. In the swollen state, they are permeable to water and to dissolved active compounds.
EUDRAGITTM L is an anionic polymer synthesized from methacrylic acid and methacrylic acid methyl ester. It is insoluble in acids and pure water. It becomes soluble in neutral to weakly alkaline conditions. The permeability of EUDRAGITTM L is pH dependent. Above pH 5.0, the polymer becomes increasingly permeable.
In one embodiment comprising a membrane-modified dosage form, the polymeric material comprises methacrylic acid co-polymers, ammonio methacrylate co-polymers, or a mixture thereof. Methacrylic acid co-polymers such as EUDRAGITTM S and EUDRAGITTM L (Rohm Pharma) are particularly suitable for use in the modified-release formulations of the present invention. These polymers are gastroresistant and enterosoluble polymers. Their polymer films are insoluble in pure water and diluted acids. They dissolve at higher pHs, depending on their content of carboxylic acid. EUDRAGITTM S and EUDRAGITTM L can be used as single components in the polymer coating or in combination in any ratio. By using a combination of the polymers, the polymeric material can exhibit a solubility at a pH between the pHs at which EUDRAGITTM L and EUDRAGITTM S are separately soluble.
The membrane coating can comprise a polymeric material comprising a major proportion (i.e., greater than 50% of the total polymeric content) of at least one pharmaceutically acceptable water-soluble polymer, and optionally a minor proportion (i.e., less than 50% of the total polymeric content) of at least one pharmaceutically acceptable water-insoluble polymer. Alternatively, the membrane coating can comprise a polymeric material comprising a major proportion (i.e., greater than 50% of the total polymeric content) of at least one pharmaceutically acceptable water-insoluble polymer, and optionally a minor proportion (i.e., less than 50% of the total polymeric content) of at least one pharmaceutically acceptable water-soluble polymer.
Ammonio methacrylate co-polymers such as Eudragit RS and Eudragit RL (Rohm Pharma) are suitable for use in the modified-release formulations of the present invention. These polymers are insoluble in pure water, dilute acids, buffer solutions, or digestive fluids over the entire physiological pH range. The polymers swell in water and digestive fluids independently of pH. In the swollen state they are then permeable to water and dissolved actives. The permeability of the polymers depends on the ratio of ethylacrylate (EA), methyl methacrylate (MMA), and trimethylammonioethyl methacrylate chloride (TAMCl) groups in the polymer. Those polymers having EA:MMA:TAMCl ratios of 1:2:0.2 (Eudragit RL) are more permeable than those with ratios of 1:2:0.1 (Eudragit RS). Polymers of Eudragit RL are insoluble polymers of high permeability. Polymers of Eudragit RS are insoluble films of low permeability.
The ammonio methacrylate co-polymers can be combined in any desired ratio. For example, a ratio of Eudragit RS:Eudragit RL (90:10) can be used. The ratios can furthermore be adjusted to provide a delay in release of the drug or pro-drug. For example, the ratio of Eudragit RS:Eudragit RL can be about 100:0 to about 80:20, about 100:0 to about 90:10, or any ratio in between. In such formulations, the less permeable polymer Eudragit RS would generally comprise the majority of the polymeric material.
The ammonio methacrylate co-polymers can be combined with the methacrylic acid co-polymers within the polymeric material in order to achieve the desired delay in release of the drug or pro-drug. Ratios of ammonio methacrylate co-polymer (e.g., Eudragit RS) to methacrylic acid co-polymer in the range of about 99:1 to about 20:80 can be used. The two types of polymers can also be combined into the same polymeric material, or provided as separate coats that are applied to the core.
In addition to the Eudragit polymers described above, a number of other such copolymers can be used to control drug release. These include methacrylate ester co-polymers (e.g., Eudragit NE 30D). Further information on the Eudragit polymers can be found in “Chemistry and Application Properties of Polymethacrylate Coating Systems,” in Aqueous Polymeric Coatings for Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms (ed. James McGinity, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pg 109-114).
The coating membrane can further comprise one or more soluble excipients so as to increase the permeability of the polymeric material. Suitably, the soluble excipient is selected from among a soluble polymer, a surfactant, an alkali metal salt, an organic acid, a sugar, and a sugar alcohol. Such soluble excipients include, but are not limited to, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyethylene glycol, sodium chloride, surfactants such as sodium lauryl sulfate and polysorbates, organic acids such as acetic acid, adipic acid, citric acid, fumaric acid, glutaric acid, malic acid, succinic acid, and tartaric acid, sugars such as dextrose, fructose, glucose, lactose and sucrose, sugar alcohols such as lactitol, maltitol, mannitol, sorbitol and xylitol, xanthan gum, dextrins, and maltodextrins. In some embodiments, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, mannitol, and/or polyethylene glycol can be used as soluble excipients. The soluble excipient(s) can be used in an amount of from about 0.5% to about 80% by weight, based on the total dry weight of the polymer.
In another embodiment, the polymeric material comprises one or more water-insoluble polymers, which are also insoluble in gastrointestinal fluids, and one or more water-soluble pore-forming compounds. For example, the water-insoluble polymer can comprise a terpolymer of polyvinylchloride, polyvinylacetate, and/or polyvinylalcohol. Suitable water-soluble pore-forming compounds include, but are not limited to, saccharose, sodium chloride, potassium chloride, polyvinylpyrrolidone, and/or polyethyleneglycol. The pore-forming compounds can be uniformly or randomly distributed throughout the water-insoluble polymer. Typically, the pore-forming compounds comprise about 1 part to about 35 parts for each about 1 to about 10 parts of the water-insoluble polymers.
When such dosage forms come in to contact with the dissolution media (e.g., intestinal fluids), the pore-forming compounds within the polymeric material dissolve to produce a porous structure through which the drug diffuses. Such formulations are described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 4,557,925, which relevant part is incorporated herein by reference for this purpose. The porous membrane can also be coated with an enteric coating, as described herein, to inhibit release in the stomach.
For example, a pore forming modified release dosage form can comprise drug or pro-drug; a filler, such as starch, lactose, or microcrystalline cellulose (AVICELTM); a binder/modified release polymer, such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose or polyvinyl pyrrolidone; a disintegrant, such as, EXPLOTABTM, crospovidone, or starch; a lubricant, such as magnesium stearate or stearic acid; a surfactant, such as sodium lauryl sulfate or polysorbates; and a glidant, such as colloidal silicon dioxide (AEROSILTM) or talc.
The polymeric material can also include one or more auxiliary agents such as fillers, plasticizers, and/or anti-foaming agents. Representative fillers include talc, fumed silica, glyceryl monostearate, magnesium stearate, calcium stearate, kaolin, colloidal silica, gypsum, micronized silica, and magnesium trisilicate. The quantity of filler used typically ranges from about 0.5% to about 300% by weight, and can range from about 0.5% to about 100%, based on the total dry weight of the polymer. In one embodiment, talc is the filler.
The coating membranes, and functional coatings as well, can also include a material that improves the processing of the polymers. Such materials are generally referred to as plasticizers and include, for example, adipates, azelates, benzoates, citrates, isoebucates, phthalates, sebacates, stearates and glycols. Representative plasticizers include acetylated monoglycerides, butyl phthalyl butyl glycolate, dibutyl tartrate, diethyl phthalate, dimethyl phthalate, ethyl phthalyl ethyl glycolate, glycerin, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, triacetin citrate, triacetin, tripropinoin, diacetin, dibutyl phthalate, acetyl monoglyceride, polyethylene glycols, castor oil, triethyl citrate, polyhydric alcohols, acetate esters, gylcerol triacetate, acetyl triethyl citrate, dibenzyl phthalate, dihexyl phthalate, butyl octyl phthalate, diisononyl phthalate, butyl octyl phthalate, dioctyl azelate, epoxidised tallate, triisoctyl trimellitate, diethylhexyl phthalate, di-n-octyl phthalate, di-i-octyl phthalate, di-i-decyl phthalate, di-n-undecyl phthalate, di-n-tridecyl phthalate, tri-2-ethylhexyl trimellitate, di-2-ethylhexyl adipate, di-2-ethylhexyl sebacate, di-2-ethylhexyl azelate, dibutyl sebacate, glyceryl monocaprylate, and glyceryl monocaprate. In one embodiment, the plasticizer is dibutyl sebacate. The amount of plasticizer used in the polymeric material typically ranges from about 0.5% to about 50%, for example, about 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50%, based on the weight of the dry polymer.
Anti-foaming agents can also be included. In one embodiment, the anti-foaming agent is simethicone. The amount of anti-foaming agent used typically comprises from about 0% to about 0.5% of the final formulation.
The amount of polymer to be used in the membrane modified formulations is typically adjusted to achieve the desired drug delivery properties, including the amount of drug to be delivered, the rate and location of drug delivery, the time delay of drug release, and the size of the multiparticulates in the formulation. The amount of polymer applied typically provides an about 0.5% to about 100% weight gain to the cores. In one embodiment, the weight gain from the polymeric material ranges from about 2% to about 70%.
The combination of all solid components of the polymeric material, including co-polymers, fillers, plasticizers, and optional excipients and processing aids, typically provides an about 0.5% to about 450% weight gain on the cores. In one embodiment, the weight gain is about 2% to about 160%.
The polymeric material can be applied by any known method, for example, by spraying using a fluidized bed coater (e.g., Wurster coating) or pan coating system. Coated cores are typically dried or cured after application of the polymeric material. Curing means that the multiparticulates are held at a controlled temperature for a time sufficient to provide stable release rates. Curing can be performed, for example, in an oven or in a fluid bed drier. Curing can be carried out at any temperature above room temperature.
A sealant or barrier can also be applied to the polymeric coating. A sealant or barrier layer can also be applied to the core prior to applying the polymeric material. A sealant or barrier layer is not intended to modify the release of drug or pro-drug. Suitable sealants or barriers are permeable or soluble agents such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl ethylcellulose, and xanthan gum.
Other agents can be added to improve the processability of the sealant or barrier layer. Such agents include talc, colloidal silica, polyvinyl alcohol, titanium dioxide, micronized silica, fumed silica, glycerol monostearate, magnesium trisilicate and magnesium stearate, or a mixture thereof. The sealant or barrier layer can be applied from solution (e.g., aqueous) or suspension using any known means, such as a fluidized bed coater (e.g., Wurster coating) or pan coating system. Suitable sealants or barriers include, for example, OPADRY WHITE Y-1-7000 and OPADRY OY/B/28920 WHITE, each of which is available from Colorcon Limited, England.
The invention also provides an oral dosage form containing a multiparticulate drug or pro-drug formulation as hereinabove defined, in the form of caplets, capsules, particles for suspension prior to dosing, sachets, or tablets. When the dosage form is in the form of tablets, the tablets can be disintegrating tablets, fast dissolving tablets, effervescent tablets, fast melt tablets, and/or mini-tablets. The dosage form can be of any shape suitable for oral administration of a drug, such as spheroidal, cube-shaped, oval, or ellipsoidal. The dosage forms can be prepared from the multiparticulates in any known manner and can include additional pharmaceutically acceptable excipients.
All of the particular embodiments described above, including but not limited to, matrix-based, osmotic pump-based, soft gelatin capsules, and/or membrane-modified forms, which can further take the form of monolithic and/or multi-unit dosage forms, can have a functional coating. Such coatings generally serve the purpose of delaying the release of the drug for a predetermined period. For example, such coatings can allow the dosage form to pass through the stomach without being subjected to stomach acid or digestive juices. Thus, such coatings can dissolve or erode upon reaching a desired point in the gastrointestinal tract, such as the upper intestine.
Such functional coatings can exhibit pH-dependent or pH-independent solubility profiles. Those with pH-independent profiles generally erode or dissolve away after a predetermined period, and the period is generally directly proportional to the thickness of the coating. Those with pH-dependent profiles, on the other hand, can maintain their integrity while in the acid pH of the stomach, but quickly erode or dissolve upon entering the more basic upper intestine.
Thus, a matrix-based, osmotic pump-based, or membrane-modified formulation can be further coated with a functional coating that delays the release of the drug. For example, a membrane-modified formulation can be coated with an enteric coating that delays the exposure of the membrane-modified formulation until the upper intestine is reached. Upon leaving the acidic stomach and entering the more basic intestine, the enteric coating dissolves. The membrane-modified formulation then is exposed to gastrointestinal fluid, and releases drug or pro-drug over an extended period, in accordance with the invention. Examples of functional coatings such as these are known in the art.
The thickness of the polymer in the formulations, the amounts and types of polymers, and the ratio of water-soluble polymers to water-insoluble polymers in the modified-release formulations are generally selected to achieve a desired release profile of drug or pro-drug. For example, by increasing the amount of water-insoluble-polymer relative to the water-soluble polymer, the release of the drug can be delayed or slowed.
Immediate-release formulations according to the present invention, when measured by a U.S. Pharmacopoeia (USP) Type 1 Apparatus (baskets) or U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) Type 2 Apparatus (paddles) at 37° C. and 50 rpm or higher in phosphate buffer at pH 6.8 or higher for the measuring period, can exhibit the following dissolution profile: about 45% or more is released in about 1 hour or less, about 50% or more is released in about 2 hours or less, and about 100% or more is released in about 3 hours or less.
The present inventive methods and formulations provide pH-independent modified-release formulations comprising a dose of an aminosalicylate active agent or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, ester or pro-drug thereof, that exhibits (a) when measured by a U.S. Pharmacopoeia (USP) Type I Apparatus (baskets) or U.S. Pharmacopoeia (USP) Type II Apparatus (paddles) at 37° C. and 50 rpm or higher in phosphate buffer at pH 6.8 or higher for the measuring period, release less than or equal to about 20%, less than about 10% or less than about 5%, in vitro in less than about 1 hour; release less than or equal to about 60%, less than about 50%, less than about 40%, or less than about 20%, in about 4 or more hours; and release greater than or equal to about 25%, greater than about 50%, or greater than about 90% in about 12 or more hours; and upon administration, the composition exhibits: (b) at least one ratio chosen from a total urine recovery or total plasma (AUC) ratio of metabolite of the active agent to the active agent greater than or equal to 10:1, and a Cmax ratio of metabolite of the active agent to the active agent greater than or equal to 5:1; and (c) from greater than 30% to about 100% of the dose of the active agent excreted in the urine as metabolite of the active agent and the active agent.
For example, pH-independent modified-release formulations according to the present invention can exhibit dissolution profiles, when measured by a U.S. Pharmacopoeia (USP) Type 1 Apparatus (baskets) or U.S. Pharmacopoeia (USP) Type 2 Apparatus (paddles) at 37° C. and 50 rpm or higher in phosphate buffer at pH 6.8 or higher for the measuring period, falling within the following windows: 1 hour: less than or equal to about 20%; 2 hours: less than or equal to about 35%; 3 hours: less than or equal to about 50%; 4 hours: less than or equal to about 60%; 6 hours: less than or equal to about 75%; and 12 hours: from about 25% to about 100%. In other embodiments, the dissolution profiles can fall within the following windows: 1 hour: less than or equal to about 20%; 2 hours: from about 5% to about 30%; 3 hours: from about 20% to about 50%; 4 hours: from about 25% to about 60%; 6 hours: from about 35% to about 75%; and 12 hours: from about 70% to about 100%. In yet still another embodiment, the dissolution profiles can fall within the following windows: 1 hour: less than or equal to about 5%; 2 hours: less than or equal to about 10%; 3 hours: from about 5% to about 30%; 4 hours: from about 10% to about 40%; 6 hours: from about 20% to about 50%; and 12 hours: from about 40% to about 100%. In another embodiment, the dissolution profiles can fall within the following windows: 1 hour: less than or equal to 10%; 2 hours: less than or equal to 20%; 3 hour: less than or equal to 30%; 4 hours: less than or equal to 40%; 6 hours: less than or equal to 50%; and 12 hours: from about 25% to about 100%. In a further embodiment, the dissolution profiles can fall within the following windows: 1 hour: less than or equal to about 5%; 2 hours: less than or equal to about 5%; 3 hours: less than or equal to about 5%; 4 hours: less than or equal to about 10%; 6 hours: less than or equal to about 20%; and 12 hours: from about 10% to about 50% drug released. Note that formulations of this invention may fall within one or more of these dissolution windows.
The present inventive methods and formulations also utilize at least one ratio chosen from a total urine recovery or total plasma (AUC) ration of metabolite of the active agent to the active agent greater than or equal to 10:1. For example, a total urine recovery ratio of metabolite of the active agent to the active agent that is greater than or equal to 10:1. This ratio is based on the active agent and the metabolite of the active agent that is excreted in the urine and as such, should reflect the active agent that was absorbed into the gut enterocyte. Further for example, the urine ratio of metabolite to parent drug may be greater than 20:1, such as greater than 100:1 and further, for example, from about 200:1 to about 300:1. Within the gut and for example, in the lower gut, there is a significant capacity for metabolism, albeit with saturable kinetics, the present inventive formulations propose to limit the systemic exposure of parent drug, i.e., the aminosalicylate active agent, and shift post-enterocyte exposure to the inactive metabolite of the aminosalicylate active agent.
In addition, the present inventive methods and formulations exhibit from greater than 30% to about 100% of an administered dose of the active agent excreted in the urine as the metabolite of the aminosalicylate active agent and aminosalicylate active agent excreted in the urine. It has been common practice in the art to assess urinary excretion as an inverse surrogate of efficacy such as, if 20% of drug is excreted in the urine, then 80% of the drug remains in the gut for local activity. Meaning, the lower the drug that is in the urine, the greater local delivery and local activity. Instead, the present inventive methods and formulations seek to maximize the percentage of the drug excreted in the urine, under a proposed rationale that the gut enterocyte has been exposed to the drug. The present inventive methods and formulations also seek to maximize the amount of metabolite of the parent drug in the plasma or urine and minimize the amount of the parent drug in the plasma or urine, as the parent drug that is absorbed into the systemic circulation is responsible for the side effects of these treatments. Furthermore, absorbed drug, ideally metabolite should appear in the plasma or urine after 3 to 4 hours post-administration, suggesting exposure of the parent at the distal gut enterocyte level, i.e., the site of action of the drug.
Moreover, the total plasma (AUC) ratio of metabolite to parent drug may also suggest whether the location of local absorption is consistent with the target site of action, i.e., the distal gut. As such, in addition to or in lieu to the total urine recovery ratio, the total plasma (AUC) ratio of metabolite to parent drug can be used. The total plasma (AUC) ratio of metabolite to parent drug may be greater than about 10:1, such as greater than about 20:1. The present inventive formulations, moreover, use a Cmax ratio of the metabolite to the active agent greater than or equal to 5:1 such as greater than or equal to 10:1. As used herein, the term “Cmax” is the maximum plasma concentration obtained during a dosing interval.
The present invention overcomes the deficiencies and problems in the prior art by providing new and effective formulations and methods for reducing, preventing, and/or managing inflammatory bowel disease, and symptoms thereof. The methods for reducing, preventing, and/or managing inflammatory bowel disease involve administering an effective amount of a drug or pro-drug, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, to a subject in need of such reduction, prevention, and/or management. The inflammatory bowel disease can be associated with at least one intestinal condition. Thus, the present invention can also be used to directly or indirectly reduce, prevent, and/or manage such intestinal conditions by the use of these drugs or pro-dugs. Examples of intestinal conditions that can be treated, prevented, and/or managed according to the present invention include, but are not limited to, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), ulcerative colitis, granulomatous enteritis, Crohn's disease, infectious diseases of the small and large intestine, pyloric spasm, abdominal cramps, functional gastrointestinal disorders, mild dysenteries, diverticulitis, acute enterocolitis, neurogenic bowel disorders, including the splenic flexure syndrome and neurogenic colon, spastic colitis, cysts, polyps, and carcinoma, and/or symptoms of any of the foregoing. Those of ordinary skill in the art will be familiar with other types of intestinal conditions that produce inflammatory bowel disease, which can benefit from the present invention.
As used herein, the term “pharmaceutically acceptable salt” includes salts that are physiologically tolerated by a subject. These salts are typically prepared by reacting the active agent with a suitable organic or inorganic counter ion known in the art. Examples of suitable salts may include, but are not limited to, sodium, potassium magnesium calcium, ammonium, ethanolamine, hydrochloride, sulphate, mesyla te(methanesulphate), tosylate(toluenesulphate) pyridine, picoline, and methylate. Salt forms, moreover, may be those that result in an appreciable increase in intrinsic dissolution rate such as a 5, 10, 50, 100 or 200 fold increase in the intrinsic dissolution rate compared with that of the free acid. In one embodiment, the pharmaceutically acceptable salt is chosen from sodium and potassium salt. In a further embodiment, the pharmaceutically acceptable salt is sodium salt.
In accordance with the invention, the drug or pro-drug, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, is formulated and/or dosed in a manner that maximizes its therapeutic effects, while minimizing at least one systemic side effect.
The present invention also provides methods and formulations for treating inflammatory bowel disease, comprising administering to a subject in need thereof an effective amount of a pharmaceutical composition comprising a dose of an aminosalicylate active agent chosen from 4-amino salicylic acid, 5-amino salicylic acid, pharmaceutically acceptable salts, esters and pro-drugs thereof, and at least one pharmaceutically acceptable excipient, formulated as a modified-release pharmaceutical composition, wherein the composition exhibits:

    
    
        (a) a drug-release profile that is independent of surrounding pH,
        (b) a dissolution profile, when tested in a U.S.P. Type II apparatus (paddles) at 37° C. and 50 rpm, in pH 6.8 buffer for the test:
        
            1 hour: less than or equal to about 20% drug released;
            2 hours: less than or equal to about 35% drug released;
            3 hours: less than or equal to about 50% drug released;
            4 hours: less than or equal to about 60% drug released;
            6 hours: less than or equal to about 75% drug released; and
            12 hours: from about 25% to about 100% drug released; and
        
        
        wherein upon administration, the composition exhibits:
        (c) at least one ratio chosen from a total urine recovery or total plasma (AUC) ratio of metabolite of the active agent to the active agent greater than or equal to 10:1, and a Cmax ratio of metabolite of the active agent to the active agent greater than or equal to 5:1; and
        (d) from greater than 30% to about 100% of an administered dose of the active agent excreted in the urine as metabolite of the active agent and the active agent.
    
    


Examples of other pharmaceutically active compounds that can be used in combination with the drug or pro-drug include, but are not limited to, steroids (for example, budesonide and other corticosteroids, and adrenal steroids such as prednisone and hydrocortisone), cytokines such as interleukin-10, antibiotics, immunomodulating agents such as azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, cyclosporine, and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents such as soluble TNF receptor and antibodies raised to TNF, and also antinflammatory agents such as zinc.
The drug or pro-drug, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, can be administered with at least one such pharmaceutically active compound. Combinations can be administered such that drug or pro-drug, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, and the at least one other pharmaceutically active compound are contained in the same dosage form. Alternatively, the combinations can be administered such that drug or pro-drug and the at least one additional pharmaceutically active compound are contained in separate dosage forms and are administered concomitantly or sequentially.
The drug or pro-drug used in accordance with the present invention can be obtained by any method. Examples of such methods are described in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,591,584, 4,559,330, and 6,602,915, each of which is incorporated herein by reference for this purpose. Modifications of the protocols described in these patents, as well as other routes of synthesis, are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art and can be employed in accordance with the present invention.
The pharmaceutically acceptable formulations described herein can be provided in the form of a pharmaceutical formulation for use according to the present invention. Such formulations optionally include at least one pharmaceutically acceptable excipient. Examples of suitable excipients are known to those of skill in the art and are described, for example, in the Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients (Kibbe (ed.), 3rd Edition (2000), American Pharmaceutical Association, Washington, D.C.), and Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy (Gennaro (ed.), 20th edition (2000), Mack Publishing, Inc., Easton, Pa.) (hereinafter referred to as “Remington”), both of which, for their disclosures relating to excipients and dosage forms, are incorporated herein by reference. Suitable excipients include, but are not limited to, starches, sugars, microcrystalline cellulose, diluents, granulating agents, lubricants, binders, disintegrating agents, wetting agents, emulsifiers, coloring agents, release agents, coating agents, sweetening agents, flavoring agents, perfuming agents, preservatives, plasticizers, gelling agents, thickeners, hardeners, setting agents, suspending agents, surfactants, humectants, carriers, stabilizers, antioxidants, and combinations thereof.
Formulations suitable for oral administration include, but are not limited to, capsules, cachets, pills, tablets, lozenges (using a flavored base, usually sucrose and acacia or tragacanth), powders, granules, solutions, suspensions in an aqueous or non-aqueous liquid, oil-in-water or water-in-oil liquid emulsions, elixirs, syrups, pastilles (using an inert base, such as gelatin and glycerin, or sucrose and acacia), mouth washes, pastes, and the like, each containing a predetermined amount of drug or pro-drug, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, to provide a therapeutic amount of the drug in one or more doses.
The drug or pro-dug, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, can be mixed with pharmaceutically acceptable excipients in the preparation of dosage forms for oral administration (capsules, tablets, pills, powders, granules and the like). Suitable excipients include, but are not limited to, carriers, such as sodium citrate or dicalcium phosphate; fillers or extenders, such as starches, lactose, sucrose, glucose, mannitol, or silicic acid; binders, such as hydroxymethyl-cellulose, alginates, gelatin, polyvinylpyrrolidone, sucrose or acacia; humectants, such as glycerol; disintegrating agents, such as agar, calcium carbonate, potato or tapioca starch, alginic acid, certain silicates, or sodium carbonate; solution retarding agents, such as paraffin; absorption accelerators, such as quaternary ammonium compounds; wetting agents, such as cetyl alcohol or glycerol monostearate; absorbents, such as kaolin and bentonite clay; lubricants, such as talc, calcium stearate, magnesium stearate, solid polyethylene glycols, and sodium lauryl sulfate; coloring agents; buffering agents; dispersing agents; preservatives; and diluents.
The aforementioned excipients are given as examples only and are not meant to include all possible choices. Solid formulations can also be employed as fillers in soft and hard-filled gelatin capsules using excipients such as lactose or milk sugars, high molecular weight polyethylene glycols, and the like. Any of these dosage forms can optionally be scored or prepared with coatings and shells, such as enteric coatings and coatings for modifying the rate of release, examples of which are well known in the pharmaceutical-formulating art.
Such coatings can comprise sodium carboxymethylcellulose, cellulose acetate, cellulose acetate phthalate, ethylcellulose, gelatin, pharmaceutical glaze, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose phthalate, methacrylic acid copolymer, methylcellulose, polyethylene glycol, polyvinyl acetate phthalate, shellac, sucrose, titanium dioxide, wax, or zein. In one embodiment, the coating material comprises hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. The coating material can further comprise anti-adhesives, such as talc; plasticizers (depending on the type of coating material selected), such as castor oil, diacetylated monoglycerides, dibutyl sebacate, diethyl phthalate, glycerin, polyethylene glycol, propylene glycol, triacetin, triethyl citrate; opacifiers, such as titanium dioxide; and/or coloring agents and/or pigments. The coating process can be carried out by any suitable means, for example, by using a perforated pan system such as the GLATTTM, ACCELACOTATM, and/or HICOATERTM apparatuses.
Tablets can be formed by any suitable process, examples of which are known to those of ordinary skill in the art. For example, the ingredients can be dry-granulated or wet-granulated by mixing in a suitable apparatus before tabletting. Granules of the ingredients to be tabletted can also be prepared using suitable spray/fluidization or extrusion/spheronization techniques.
The tablets can be formulated with suitable excipients to act as a fast dissolving and/or fast melting tablet in the oral cavity. Also, the tablet can be in the form of a chewable or effervescent dosage form. With effervescent dosage forms, the tablet can be added to a suitable liquid that causes it to disintegrate, dissolve, and/or disperse.
Tablets can be designed to have an appropriate hardness and friability to facilitate manufacture on an industrial scale using equipment to produce tablets at high speed. Also, the tablets can be packed or filled in any kind of container. It should be noted that the hardness of tablets, amongst other properties, can be influenced by the shape of the tablets. Different shapes of tablets can be used according to the present invention. Tablets can be circular, oblate, oblong, or any other shape. The shape of the tablets can also influence the disintegration rate.
Any of the inventive formulations can be encapsulated in soft and hard gelatin capsules, which can also include any of the excipients described above. For example, the encapsulated dosage form can include fillers, such as lactose and microcrystalline; glidants, such as colloidal silicon dioxide and talc; lubricants, such as magnesium stearate; and disintegrating agents, such as starch (e.g., maize starch). Using capsule filling equipment, the ingredients to be encapsulated can be milled together, sieved, mixed, packed together, and then delivered into a capsule. Lubricants can be present in an amount of from about 0.5% (w/w) to about 2.0% (w/w).
The formulations of the invention, which comprise drug or pro-drug, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, can also be formulated into a liquid dosage form for oral administration. Suitable formulations can include emulsions, microemulsions, solutions, suspensions, syrups, and elixirs. The drug or pro-drug can be formulated as an ion-exchange resin complex, a microencapsulated particle, a liposome particle, or a polymer coated particle or granule. These formulations optionally include diluents commonly used in the art, such as, for example, water or other solvents, solubilizing agents and emulsifiers. Emulsifiers include, but are not limited to, ethyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, ethyl carbonate, ethyl acetate, benzyl alcohol, benzyl benzoate, propylene glycol, 1,3-butylene glycol, oils, glycerol, tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol, polyethylene glycols, fatty acid esters of sorbitan, and mixtures thereof. In addition, the inventive formulations can include adjuvants such as wetting agents, emulsifying and suspending agents, sweetening, flavoring, coloring, perfuming, and preservative agents. Suitable suspension agents include, but are not limited to, ethoxylated isostearyl alcohols, polyoxyethylene sorbitol and sorbitan esters, microcrystalline cellulose, aluminum metahydroxide, bentonite, agar-agar and tragacanth, and mixtures thereof. The liquid formulations can be delivered as-is, or can be provided in hard or soft capsules, for example.
The amount of suspending agent present will vary according to the particular suspending agent used, and the presence or absence of other ingredients that have an ability to act as a suspending agent or contribute significantly to the viscosity of the formulation. The suspension can also contain ingredients that improve its taste, for example sweeteners; bitter-taste maskers, such as sodium chloride; taste-masking flavors, such as contramarum; flavor enhancers, such as monosodium glutamate; and flavoring agents. Examples of sweeteners include bulk sweeteners, such as sucrose, hydrogenated glucose syrup, the sugar alcohols sorbitol and xylitol; and sweetening agents such as sodium cyclamate, sodium saccharin, aspartame, and ammonium glycyrrhizinate. The liquid formulations can further comprise one or more buffering agents, as needed, to maintain a desired pH.
The liquid formulations of the present invention can also be filled into soft gelatin capsules. The liquid can include a solution, suspension, emulsion, microemulsion, precipitate, or any other desired liquid media carrying the pharmaceutically active compound. The liquid can be designed to improve the solubility of the pharmaceutically active compound upon release, or can be designed to form a drug-containing emulsion or dispersed phase upon release. Examples of such techniques are well known in the art. Soft gelatin capsules can be coated, as desired, with a functional coating. Such functional coatings generally serve the purpose of delaying the release of the drug for a predetermined period. For example, such coatings can allow the dosage form to pass through the stomach without being subjected to stomach acid or digestive juices. Thus, such coatings can dissolve or erode upon reaching a desired point in the gastrointestinal tract, such as the upper intestine.
For rectal administration, the inventive formulations can be provided as a suppository. Suppositories can comprise one or more non-irritating excipients such as, for example, polyethylene glycol, a suppository wax, or an aminosalicylate. Such excipients can be selected on the basis of desirable physical properties. For example, a compound that is solid at room temperature but liquid at body temperature will melt in the rectum and release the active compound. The formulation can alternatively be provided as an enema for rectal delivery.
The amount of the dose administered, as well as the dose frequency, will vary depending on the particular dosage form used and the route of administration. The amount and frequency of administration will also vary according to the age, body weight, and response of the individual subject. Typical dosing regimens can readily be determined by a competent physician without undue experimentation. It is also noted that the clinician or treating physician will know how and when to interrupt, adjust, or terminate therapy in conjunction with individual subject response.
In general, the total daily dosage for reducing, preventing, and/or managing the inflammatory bowel disease and/or the intestinal conditions that cause the same, with any of the formulations according to the present invention, is from about 250 mg to about 8000 mg, or from about 500 mg to about 8000 mg, or from about 1000 mg to about 6000 mg, or from about 1500 mg to about 4000 mg. Pro-drugs should be formulated to deliver an equivalent dose. A single oral dose can be formulated to contain about 100 mg, 250 mg, 500 mg, 750 mg, 1000 mg, 1500 mg, 2000 mg, or 3000 mg, or any amount in between.
The pharmaceutical formulations containing drug and/or pro-drug, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, can be administered in single or divided doses, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or more times each day. Alternatively, the dose can be delivered one or more times every 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or more days. In one embodiment, the pharmaceutical formulations are administered once per day.
Other than in the examples, or where otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, reaction conditions, and so forth used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instance by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the following specification and attached claims are approximations that may vary depending upon desired properties sought to be obtained herein. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should be construed in light of the number of significant digits and ordinary rounding approaches.
Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, inherently contain certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements. The following example is intended to illustrate the present disclosure without limiting the scope as a result.
The invention is further illustrated by reference to the following examples. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many modifications, both to the materials and methods, can be practiced without departing from the purpose and scope of the invention.


EXAMPLES
Example 1
Modified Release 4-ASA Sodium Salt Formulation
4-aminosalicylate was formulated in a matrix tablet. 4-aminosalicylate matrix tablet formulation and processing details are given below.
Matrix Formulation














Ingredient
(g/batch)



















4 Aminosalicylate Sodium
897.00



METHOCEL *PREMIUM
273.00



K100M



Dibasic Calcium
622.70



Phosphate



CABOSIL (Silicon Dioxide)
9.1



Magnesium Stearate
18.20



TOTAL
1902.80







*Methocel grade can be changed or alternatively can be a suitable controlled-release polymer from the example list.






Process—Wet Granulation Process (Using the Matrix Formulation Above)
1. The ingredients were weighed.
2. Cabosil and dibasic calcium phosphate were blended (e.g., Planetary (Hobart), High Shear (Diosna/Fielder)) and screened through 30 mesh.
3. To the Cabosil/dibasic calcium phosphate mixture, Methocel and 4-ASA sodium salt were added into a fielder granulator.
4. Mixing was continued for at least one minute and then, purified water was added until a suitable granulation end-point was achieved.
5. The granules were dried (using an oven or fluidization equipment) until an acceptable level of moisture (<about 3%). An infrared moisture balance can be used to ascertain water content, and a gas chromatograph can be used for organic solvents.
6. The dry granulate was passed through suitable comminution equipment (for example, Co-Mill or Fitzpatrick mill) fitted with a suitable sized screen (e.g., 20 mesh).
7. The mixture was compressed into oval shaped tablets (target weight 100 mg) on a suitable tablet machine.
Coating of the Matrix Tablet
The above-described matrix tablet formulation was coated with a base coat and different levels of a non-enteric delayed release coating.
Matrix Coating

















A
B
C



Ingredient
(g)
(g)
(g)









Base Coat:
—
—
—



Opadry II
54.6
54.6
54.6



Non-enteric delayed release coating:
—
—
—



Aquacoat
29.38
58.76
88.14



Triethyl Citrate
7.8
15.6
23.4










Coating Process
1. The tablets were loaded into a suitable coating machine (e.g., Glatt, Acelacota).
2. The base coating solution was sprayed onto the tablets.
3. When the required amount of polymer coating solution was applied, the tablets were dried on the coating machine.
4. The non-enteric delayed release coating was then sprayed on.
5. When the required amount of polymer coating solution was applied, the tablets were dried on the coating machine.
When tested in a U.S.P. Type II apparatus (paddles) at 37° C. and 50 rpm, in pH 6.8 buffer, the three formulations with different coatings resulted in the following in vitro dissolution profiles found in TABLE A.












TABLE A







Time
A
B
C



(Hour)
(% released)
(% released)
(% released)





















0.5
3.6
0.4
0.0



1
9.6
1.4
0.0



2
23.0
4.8
0.1



3
36.1
10.0
0.4



4
47.6
16.5
1.3



6
66.6
30.2
4.8



12
95.3
68.6
37.6










Example 2
5-ASA Formulation
5-aminosalicylate is formulated in a matrix tablet. 5-aminosalicylate matrix tablet formulation and processing details are given below.
Matrix Formulation














Ingredient
(g/batch)



















5-ASA
650



METHOCEL *PREMIUM
197.6



K100M



Dibasic Calcium
450.32



Phosphate



CABOSIL (Silicon Dioxide)
6.60



Magnesium Stearate
13.18



TOTAL
1317.7







*Methocel grade can be changed or alternatively can be a suitable controlled-release polymer from the example list.






Process—Wet Granulation Process (Using the Matrix Formulation Above)
1. The ingredients are weighed.
2. Cabosil and dibasic calcium phosphate are blended (e.g., Planetary (Hobart), High Shear (Diosna/Fielder)) and screened through 30 mesh.
3. To the Cabosil/dibasic calcium phosphate mixture, Methocel and 5-ASA are added into a fielder granulator.
4. Mixing is continued for at least one minute and then, purified water is added until a suitable granulation end-point is achieved.
5. The granules are dried (using an oven or fluidization equipment) until an acceptable level of moisture (<about 3%). An infrared moisture balance can be used to ascertain water content, and a gas chromatograph can be used for organic solvents.
6. The dry granulate is passed through suitable comminution equipment (for example, Co-Mill or Fitzpatrick mill) fitted with a suitable sized screen (e.g., 20 mesh).
7. The mixture is compressed into oval shaped tablets (target weight 100 mg) on a suitable tablet machine.
Example 3
Olsalazine Formulation
Olsalazine, i.e., 5,5′-azo-bis-salicylic acid, is formulated in a matrix tablet. Olsalazine matrix tablet formulation and processing details are given below.
Matrix Formulation














Ingredient
(g/batch)



















OLSALAZINE
744.64



METHOCEL *PREMIUM
226.63



K100M



Dibasic Calcium
516.93



Phosphate



CABOSIL (Silicon Dioxide)
7.55



Magnesium Stearate
15.10



TOTAL
1510.85







*Methocel grade can be changed or alternatively can be a suitable controlled-release polymer from the example list.






Process—Wet Granulation Process (Using the Matrix Formulation Above)
1. The ingredients are weighed.
2. Cabosil and dibasic calcium phosphate are blended (e.g., Planetary (Hobart), High Shear (Diosna/Fielder)) and screened through 30 mesh.
3. To the Cabosil/dibasic calcium phosphate mixture, Methocel and olsalazine are added into a fielder granulator.
4. Mixing is continued for at least one minute and then, purified water is added until a suitable granulation end-point is achieved.
5. The granules are dried (using an oven or fluidization equipment) until an acceptable level of moisture (<about 3%). An infrared moisture balance can be used to ascertain water content, and a gas chromatograph can be used for organic solvents.
6. The dry granulate is passed through suitable comminution equipment (for example, Co-Mill or Fitzpatrick mill) fitted with a suitable sized screen (e.g., 20 mesh).
7. The mixture is compressed into oval shaped tablets (target weight 100 mg) on a suitable tablet machine.
Example 4
Balzalazide Formulation
Balzalazide is formulated in a matrix tablet. Balzalazide matrix tablet formulation and processing details are given below.
Matrix Formulation














Ingredient
(g/batch)



















BALSALAZIDE
703.13



METHOCEL *PREMIUM
556.37



K100M



Dibasic Calcium
1269.09



Phosphate



CABOSIL (Silicon Dioxide)
18.54



Magnesium Stearate
37.10



TOTAL
3709.24







*Methocel grade can be changed or alternatively can be a suitable controlled-release polymer from the example list.






Process—Wet Granulation Process (Using the Matrix Formulation Above)
1. The ingredients are weighed.
2. Cabosil and dibasic calcium phosphate are blended (e.g., Planetary (Hobart), High Shear (Diosna/Fielder)) and screened through 30 mesh.
3. To the Cabosil/dibasic calcium phosphate mixture, Methocel and balzalazide were added into a fielder granulator.
4. Mixing is continued for at least one minute and then, purified water is added until a suitable granulation end-point is achieved.
5. The granules are dried (using an oven or fluidization equipment) until an acceptable level of moisture (<about 3%). An infrared moisture balance can be used to ascertain water content, and a gas chromatograph can be used for organic solvents.
6. The dry granulate is passed through suitable comminution equipment (for example, Co-Mill or Fitzpatrick mill) fitted with a suitable sized screen (e.g., 20 mesh).
7. The mixture is compressed into oval shaped tablets (target weight 100 mg) on a suitable tablet machine.
Example 5
Coating of Examples 2-4
The matrix tablet formulations described in Examples 2-4 are coated with a base coat and different levels of a non-enteric delayed release coat to give a range of release profiles.
Matrix Coating

















A
B
C



Ingredient
(g)
(g)
(g)









Base Coat:
—
—
—



Opadry II
54.6
54.6
54.6



Non-enteric delayed release coating:
—
—
—



Aquacoat
29.38
58.76
88.14



Triethyl Citrate
7.8
15.6
23.4










Coating Process
1. The tablets are loaded into a suitable coating machine (e.g., Glatt, Acelacota).
2. The base coating solution is sprayed onto the tablets.
3. When the required amount of polymer coating solution is applied, the tablets are dried on the coating machine.
4. The non-enteric delayed release coating is then sprayed on.
5. When the required amount of polymer coating solution is applied, the tablets are dried on the coating machine.
Example 6
Biostudy
An open-label, single-dose, four-treatment, four periods, balanced, randomized, crossover study with at least a seven-day wash out between each dose was designed and executed to compare and assess the relative bioavailability of three modified-release formulations with an immediate-release reference formulation. Prototype modified-release formulations of 4-ASA were prepared according to Example 1. In addition, a reference solution was used that comprised of an immediate release solution of 4-ASA, i.e., Treatment D.
Sixteen healthy volunteers were enrolled and were dosed on at least three occasions and fourteen subjects completed the study and received all four treatments. The volunteers were fasting from food and beverages other than water for at least 4 hours before dosing in each treatment period. Water was proscribed for one hour before and one hour after dosing except for the 150 mL of water at the time of dosing. Venous blood samples were obtained at regular time intervals immediately prior to and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 30, and 36 hours after dosing with the prototype formulations of Example 1 (blood samples were also collected after dosing with the reference solution at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10 hours). In addition, urine was collected prior to dosing, at 2 hour intervals up to 8 hours, from 8-12 hours, and at 12 hour intervals up to 36 hours. Concentrations of 4-ASA and n-acetylated 4-ASA (i.e., n-acetyl-4-ASA—the metabolite) in plasma and urine were measured by a validated LC MS/MS method incorporating a solid phase extraction method. Individual plasma concentration curves were constructed and individual, mean, and relative pharmacokinetic parameters were determined including tmax, Cmax and AUC. Total urinary recovery of 4-ASA and the n-acetylated 4-ASA metabolite were estimated.
Based on the urinary recovery of 4-ASA and its metabolite found below in TABLE B, the highest % of recovery was recovered following administration of A at 67%. This was slightly higher than that recovered following administration of the reference solution, i.e., Treatment D at 59%. In addition, this was considerably higher than that recovered following administration of B at 47% or at 35%. Interestingly, although the overall urinary amount recovered from the solution and A did not differ greatly, the percent drug recovered as the parent, 4-ASA, was considerably higher for the reference (3%) than for A (0.3%). Only 0.1% of drug was recovered as the parent, 4-ASA, for formulations B and C.








TABLE B







Analyte



(mean ± Std.
% Urinary Recovery











Dev)
A
B
C
D





4-ASA
0.3 ± 0.1
0.1 ± 0.1
0.1 ± 0.1
3.0 ± 2.3


n-acetyl-4-ASA
66.3 ± 18.2
46.7 ± 22.6
35.3 ± 15.8
56.3 ± 22.3


TOTAL
66.5 ± 18.2
46.9 ± 22.6
35.4 ± 15.8
59.2 ± 21.9









The 4-ASA plasma relative bioavailability (based on AUC0-t) of the test treatments compared to the reference solution ranged from 20±9% (A), 9±7% (B) to 9±8% (C). The 4-ASA plasma Cmax of the test treatments were 212±137 ng/mL (A), 46±22 ng/mL (B) and 42±23 ng/mL (C) compared to the reference solution 6661±2235 ng/mL. The lag times prior to the time corresponding to the first measurable (non-zero) 4-ASA concentrations were 0.3±0.6 h (A), 5.8±4.7 h (B) and 10.5±5.4 h (C) compared to the reference solution, 0.0±0.0 h. The median time to reach peak 4-ASA plasma concentrations were 3 h (A), 11 h (B) and 20 h (C) compared to the reference solution, 0.38 h.
Accordingly, there was a lower exposure of the prototypes demonstrated by the markedly lower relative Cmax values, indicated as a % of that of the solution. For example, the relative Cmax value for A was 3%, B was 0.7%, and C was 0.6%.
The n-acetyl-4-ASA plasma relative bioavailability (based on AUC0-t) of the test treatments compared to the reference solution ranged from 97±25% (A), 72±33% (B) to 56±29% (C). The n-acteyl-4-ASA plasma Cmax of the test treatments were 1074±474 ng/mL (A), 559±211 ng/mL (B) and 482±226 ng/mL (C) compared to the reference solution 6568±1882 ng/mL. The lag times prior to the time corresponding to the first measurable (non-zero) n-acteyl-4-ASA concentrations were 0.2±0.6 h (A), 1.6±1.5 h (B) and 5.1±3.8 h (C) compared to the reference solution, 0.0±0.0 h. The median time to reach n-acteyl-4-ASA plasma peak concentrations were 4 h (A), 16 h (B) and 30 h (C) compared to the reference solution, 0.5 h.
The local delivery to the intestinal cells of the colon was suggested by the time of appearance and extent of plasma metabolite (i.e., n-acetyl 4-ASA). This metabolite was formed primarily in the intestinal cell with a particular concentration of the metabolizing enzyme in the colon. Thus, after the expected dosage form induced delays, levels of plasma metabolite appeared. The colon selective delivery of the prototypes was suggested by the total urine recovery ratio of metabolite to active agent (i.e., n-Acetyl 4-ASA to 4-ASA). In this instance, the control solution exhibited a ratio of 2.3, but the ratio values of the prototypes were different. For example, the ratio of the prototypes were 10.6 (A), 20.5 (B), and 16.9 (C).
Example 7
Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis with Modified-Release 4-ASA
Modified-release formulations according to Example 1(B) are prepared. Patients are diagnosed with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. The patients are split into 5 treatment groups. Three treatment groups receive different daily doses of Modified Release 4-ASA sodium i.e., 1.0 g, 1.5 g or 2.0 g/day. In addition, the study includes a placebo group and a 5-ASA (Asacol 2.4 g/day) group. Patients are treated for 8 weeks. Patients keep daily diaries and record the number and nature of bowel movements. The effect of the treatments is assessed by grading clinical symptoms of fecal blood, mucus, and urgency. In addition, sigmoidoscopic assessment and biopsies are performed, and efficacy of treatment assessed, based on grading of sigmoidoscopic and degree of histological inflammation in rectal biopsy specimens. Safety is assessed based on spontaneous side effect reporting.
Example 8
Treatment of Crohn's Disease with Modified-Release 5-ASA
Modified-release formulations according to Examples 2 and 5(A) are prepared. Patients are diagnosed with mild to moderate Crohn's Disease. The patients are split into 5 treatment groups. Three treatment groups receive different daily doses of Modified Release 5-ASA i.e., 1.0 g, 1.5 g or 2.0 g/day. In addition, the study includes a placebo group and a reference 5-ASA (Asacol 2.4 g/day) group. Patients are treated for 8 weeks. Patients keep daily diaries and record the number and nature of bowel movements. The effect of the treatments is assessed by grading clinical symptoms of fecal blood, mucus, and urgency. In addition, sigmoidoscopic assessment and biopsies are performed, and efficacy of treatment assessed, based on grading of sigmoidoscopic and degree of histological inflammation in rectal biopsy specimens. Safety is assessed based on spontaneous side effect reporting.
Example 9
Maintenance of Remission of Ulcerative Colitis with Modified-Release 5,5′-Azo-Bis Aminosalicylate Sodium(Olsalazine)
Modified-release formulations according to Examples 3 and 5(B) are prepared. Patients diagnosed with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis and successfully treated with commercial olsalazine (Dipentum) 1 g/day, are entered into the study. The patients are split into 3 treatment groups. Two treatment groups receive daily doses of Modified Release 5,5′-azo-bis aminosalicylate sodium (olsalazine), i.e., 0.5 g or 1.0 g/day. In addition, the study includes an olsalazine reference (e.g., Dipentum 1.0 g/day) group. Patients are treated for up to 6 months. Treatments are compared based on relapse rates. Patients keep daily diaries and record the number and nature of bowel movements. The maintenance of treatments is assessed by grading clinical symptoms of fecal blood, mucus, and urgency. In addition, sigmoidoscopic assessment and biopsies are performed, and efficacy of treatment assessed, based on grading of sigmoidoscopic and degree of histological inflammation in rectal biopsy specimens. Safety is assessed based on spontaneous side effect reporting.
The incidence of diarrhea observed with the modified release formulation at both dose levels is lower than that observed with the olsalazine reference (i.e., Dipentum).

## Claims

1. A pharmaceutical composition for administration to a subject in need thereof comprising a dose of an aminosalicylate active agent chosen from 4-amino salicylic acid, 5-amino salicylic acid, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts, esters and pro-drugs thereof; at least one polymer chosen from water-soluble cellulosic polymers, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyethylene glycol, water-insoluble acrylate polymers, water-insoluble cellulosic polymers, and mixtures thereof; and at least one pharmaceutically acceptable excipient chosen from carriers, fillers, extenders, binders, absorbents, lubricants, and stabilizers; wherein the composition exhibits:
(a) a drug-release profile that is independent of surrounding pH; and
(b) a dissolution profile, when tested in a U.S.P. Type II apparatus (paddles) at 37° C and 50 rpm, in pH 6.8 buffer for the test:
1 hour: less than or equal to about 20% drug released;
2 hours: less than or equal to about 35% drug released;
3 hours: less than or equal to about 50% drug released;
4 hours: less than or equal to about 60% drug released;
6 hours: less than or equal to about 75% drug released; and
12 hours: from about 25% to about 100% drug released; and wherein upon administration, the composition exhibits:
(c) at least one ratio chosen from a total urine recovery or total plasma (AUC) ratio of metabolite of the active agent to the active agent greater than or equal to 10:1, and a Cmax ratio of metabolite of the active agent to the active agent greater than or equal to 5:1; and
(d) from greater than 30% to about 100% of the dose of the active agent excreted in the urine as metabolite of the active agent and the active agent,
wherein the composition comprises a modified-release matrix core.

2. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the dissolution profile, when tested in a U.S.P. Type II apparatus (paddles) at 37° C. and 50 rpm, in pH 6.8 buffer for the test:
1 hour: less than or equal to about 10% drug released;
2 hours: less than or equal to about 20% drug released;
3 hours: less than or equal to about 30% drug released;
4 hours: less than or equal to about 40% drug released;
6 hours: less than or equal to about 50% drug released; and
12 hours: from about 25% to about 100% drug released.

3. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the dissolution profile, when tested in a U.S.P. Type II apparatus (paddles) at 37° C. and 50 rpm, in pH 6.8 buffer for the test:
1 hour: less than or equal to about 5% drug released;
2 hours: less than or equal to about 10% drug released;
3 hours: from about 5% to about 30% drug released;
4 hours: from about 10% to about 40% drug released;
6 hours: from about 20% to about 50% drug released; and
12 hours: from about 40% to about 100% drug released.

4. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition comprises a semi-permeable membrane.

5. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the aminosalicylate and/or salicylic acid is 4-aminosalicylic acid or pharmaceutical salt thereof.

6. The composition according to claim 5, wherein 4-aminosalicylic acid is sodium 4-aminosalicylate.

7. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the aminosalicylate active agent is chosen from olsalazine (5,5′-azo-bis salicylic acid), balsalazide, 4,5′-azo-bis salicylic acid, 4,4′-azo-bis salicylic acid, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof.

8. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the at least one pharmaceutically acceptable excipient is chosen from carriers, fillers, extenders, binders, humectants, disintegrating agents, solution-retarding agents, absorption accelerators, wetting agents, absorbents, lubricants, stabilizers, coloring agents, buffering agents, dispersing agents, preservatives, organic acids, and organic bases.

9. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the total urine recovery ratio of the metabolite of the active agent to the active agent is greater than 20:1.

10. The composition according to claim 9, wherein the total urine recovery ratio of the metabolite of the active agent to the active agent is greater than 100:1.

11. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the Cmax ratio of the metabolite of the active agent to the active agent is greater than or equal to 10:1.

12. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the dose of the aminosalicylate active agent ranges from 100 mg to 8000 mg.

13. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the dose is chosen from single and divided dosages.

14. A method of treating inflammatory bowel disease comprising administering to a subject in need thereof an effective amount of a pharmaceutical composition comprising a dose of an aminosalicylate active agent chosen from 4-amino salicylic acid, 5-amino salicylic acid, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts, esters and prodrugs thereof; at least one polymer chosen from water-soluble cellulosic polymers, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyethylene glycol, water-insoluble acrylate polymers, water-insoluble cellulosic polymers, and mixtures thereof; and at least one pharmaceutically acceptable excipient chosen from carriers, fillers, extenders, absorbents, lubricants, and stabilizers; wherein the composition exhibits:
(a) a drug-release profile that is independent of surrounding pH; and
(b) a dissolution profile, when tested in a U.S.P. Type II apparatus (paddles) at 37° G and 50 rpm, in pH 6.8 buffer for the test:
1 hour: less than or equal to about 20% drug released;
2 hours: less than or equal to about 35% drug released;
3 hours: less than or equal to about 50% drug released;
4 hours: less than or equal to about 60% drug released;
6 hours: less than or equal to about 75% drug released; and
12 hours: from about 25% to about 100% drug released; and wherein upon administration, the composition exhibits:
(c) at least one ratio chosen from a total urine recovery or total plasma (AUG) ratio of metabolite of the active agent to the active agent greater than or equal to 10:1, and a Gmax ratio of metabolite of the active agent to the active agent greater than or equal to 5:1; and
(d) from greater than 30% to about 100% of the dose of the active agent excreted in the urine as metabolite of the active agent and the active agent,
wherein the composition comprises a modified-release matrix core.

15. The method according to claim 14, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is administered in a modified-release formulation.

16. The method according to claim 15, wherein the modified-release formulation exhibits a release profile with properties chosen from delayed-release and extended-release.

17. The method according to claim 14, wherein the dose of the aminosalicylate active agent ranges from 100 mg to 8000 mg.

18. The method according to claim 14, wherein the dose is chosen from single and divided dosages.

19. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the water-soluble cellulosic polymer is hydroxypropyl methylcellulose.

20. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the water-insoluble cellulosic polymer is ethylcellulose.