alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 485 

Recognizing the historic significance of the ‘‘Betsy Ross Flag’’, a symbolic 

representation of America’s revolutionary period and our Nation’s commitment to freedom and unity. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2019 

Mr. BOST (for himself, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. COLLINS

of New York, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. RESCHENTHALER, Mr. 

BAIRD, Mr. HICE of Georgia, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mr. 

GAETZ, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. COMER, Mr. WALKER, Mr. RIGGLEMAN, Mr. 

BRADY, Mr. GIANFORTE, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. SHIMKUS, and Mr. 

MOOLENAAR) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the historic significance of the ‘‘Betsy Ross 

Flag’’, a symbolic representation of America’s revolutionary period and our Nation’s commitment to freedom 

and unity. 

Whereas legend credits Elizabeth Griscom Ross, popularly 

known as Betsy Ross, with the creation of the new American Nation’s 13-starred flag; 

Whereas Betsy Ross was born on January 1, 1752, in the 

city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; 

Whereas Betsy Ross’ first husband, John Ross, perished 

while serving as a member of the Pennsylvania militia 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 485 IH 

during the American Revolutionary War, leaving Betsy 

Ross a widow at the age of 24; 

Whereas Betsy Ross, a seamstress, worked as a flag maker 

during the war, and according to legend, met with General George Washington to complete a design for a flag 

of the United States; 

Whereas such flag designs have been popularly called the 

Betsy Ross Flag; 

Whereas Betsy Ross has been recognized as an important 

historical and cultural figure, and her legacy has been associated with patriotic causes and the fight for the equal 

rights of women; 

Whereas the Betsy Ross Flag has been presented at numerous historical, cultural, and political events of great significance, including America’s Bicentennial celebration 

and Presidential inaugural ceremonies; 

Whereas the United States Postal Service commissioned a 

commemorative stamp in 1952 to honor the 200th anniversary of the birth of Betsy Ross; and 

Whereas the Betsy Ross Flag continues to serve as a reminder of a new nation’s founding spirit and commitment 

to liberty, a commitment that continues to make the 

United States a beacon for freedom across the world: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes that the spirit of the Betsy Ross Flag should be cele3 brated and has served as an inspiration for the cause of 

4 freedom. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of

INDEPENDENT BANCSHARES, INC.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Independent BancShares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Mark A. Imes,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Nicholas J. Panicaro, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such Report.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      |  |  |  |                         
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------
|/s/ Mark A. Imes                      |  |  |  | /s/ Nicholas J. Panicaro
|Mark A. Imes                          |  |  |  | Nicholas J. Panicaro    
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer 
|                                      |  | 
|Date: November 13, 2009               |  |  |  | Date: November 13, 2009
Exhibit 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual
Report of Cardiff Lexington Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Healy, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:



1.       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: October 21, 2022



| | By: /s/ Steven Healy                                  
| | ------------------------------------------------------
| | Steven Healy                                          
| | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 123 (Monday, June 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15296]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,807]


Leech Industries, Inc., Meadville, PA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 16, 2009 in response to a petition 
filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Leech Industries, 
Inc., Meadville, Pennsylvania. The workers at the subject facility 
produce plastics, electrical conductors and injection molds.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 18th day of May 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-15296 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6171

JAY TIMOTHY LURZ,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JON P. GALLEY, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR

THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-01-

1994-AMD)

Submitted: April 25, 2002 Decided: May 6, 2002

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jay Timothy Lurz, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jay Timothy Lurz appeals the district court’s order dismissing

without prejudice his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See Lurz v. Galley, No. CA-01-

1994-AMD (D. Md. Dec. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Town of Montauk, Appellant, v Lorraine Cortez-Vasquez, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, with Control of, and Responsibility for, the Division of Corporations of the Department of State, Respondent.

Decided September 12, 2013

Appeal transferred, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, to the Appellate Division, Third Department, upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie when questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved *(see*NY Const, art VI, §§ 3 [b] [2]; 5 [b]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]).
#### KURIS et al. v. PEPPER POULTRY CO., Inc.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Dec. 19, 1941.

*362Clarence E. Mellen, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Nathan E. Zelby, of New York City, for defendant.

CLANCY, District Judge.

This is a motion by the defendant for leave to amend its answer and incorporate a cross-claim over and a counterclaim against two of the plaintiffs.

The proposed counterclaim is for property damage to defendant’s truck. This action was commenced on August 1, 1940 and issue was joined on August 16, 1940. On December 7, 1940, defendant obtained an order to take the depositions of the plaintiffs. A few of these depositions were taken on December 16, 1940, at which time the plaintiff’s attorney, according to his affidavit and it was not denied by the defendant, informed the latter that the subject matter of the proposed counterclaim was the basis of an action then already commenced. In view of this fact, we are inclined to disbelieve the defendant’s reason for failure to proceed with application before now was “due solely to inadvertence and oversight.” In view of the circumstances surrounding numerous adjournments procured at the instance of the defendant’s attorney, the case finally having been set down at the head of the calendar on January 13, 1942, peremptorily against the defendant, we feel that the granting of this relief would be an unwarranted denial of the plaintiffs’ right to a just, inexpensive and speedy trial of the issues. Accordingly, this relief is denied because of the defendant’s laches and apparent lack of good faith in making the application. United States v. Shuman, D.C., 1 F.R.D. 251; Hessian Hills Corp. v. Union Central Life Ins. Co., D.C., 1 F.R.D. 743. We think it unnecessary to treat of the sufficiency of the proposed counterclaim.

The defendant’s application for leave to assert a cross-claim against these two plaintiffs as third-party defendants is without merit. The defendant contends that Rule 14 and Rule 13 (g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, authorize same. Obviously they do not. Rule 14 explicitly states that a party may implead “a person not a party to the action.” Here the persons attempted to be impleaded are plaintiffs in the action. Rule 13 (g) provides for the assertion of a cross-claim against a coparty for any claim by one party against a coparty, etc. The proposed cross-claim of the defendant admittedly makes no claim on its own behalf but rather a claim on behalf of some of the plaintiffs against some of the other plaintiffs nor is it asserted against a coparty. This obviously is not within the purview of Rule 13 (g) nor can we find any authority to sustain it whatsoever. In fact, it is not a cross-claim at all but rather an attempt’ on the part of the defendant to compel an election on the part of some of the plaintiffs. The relief requested is, therefore, denied.
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 CECILE FOY GSANGER

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

July 15, 2015

Hon. Joseph Moreno

Attorney at Law

23409 El Paso Drive

Harlingen, TX 78552

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Luis V. Saenz

District Attorney

964 E. Harrison

Brownsville, TX 78520-7123

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-15-00284-CR

Tr.Ct.No. 2014-DCR-00966-E

Style: Wilson Orlando Matamoros a/k/a Wilson Matamoros a/k/a Wilson Orlando 

Matamoros Reyes v. The State of Texas

Appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the above cause was this day 

DISMISSED AS MOOT by this Court.

Very truly yours,

Cecile Foy Gsanger, Clerk

CFG:ch
@article{1207181,
  author = {Ya-Shian Li-Baboud and Ann Virts and Roger Bostelman and Soocheol Yoon and Amaan Rahman and Lucia Rhode and Nishat Ahmed and Mili Shah},
  title = {Evaluation Methods and Measurement Challenges for Industrial Exoskeletons},
  year = {2023},
  number = {23},
  month = {2023-06-15 04:06:00},
  publisher = {Journal of Senors},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936581},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.3390/s23125604},
  language = {en},
}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

RONMEL WILLIAMS, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 779 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED. 

Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this matter.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

 

WHOLEHEALTH PRODUCTS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wholehealth Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period  ended May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joe Arcaro, Principal  Executive  Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Joe Arcaro and will be retained by Wholehealth Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 Dated: October 4, 2012

 

By: /s/ Joe Arcaro

Joe Arcaro

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

EXHIBIT 32.2

 

 

WHOLEHEALTH PRODUCTS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wholehealth Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q  for the period  ended May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joe Arcaro, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Joe Arcaro and will be retained by Wholehealth Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

Dated: October 4, 2012

By: /s/ Joe Arcaro

Joe Arcaro 

Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131165 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

KENNETH L. HENRY,

Petitioner-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131165 

 COA: 265747

 Ingham CC: 04-001684-AA 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 3, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000811562
<NAME> KIMMINS CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,160,463
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               24,317,155
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (397,211)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,117,192
<PP&E>                                      56,810,219
<DEPRECIATION>                            (19,217,558)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              93,628,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,568,873
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,447
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,376,989
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                93,628,550
<SALES>                                    111,346,075
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           111,346,075
<CGS>                                       93,385,634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,364,168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               345,320
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,417,802
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,833,151
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,490,568
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,342,583
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,342,583
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the undersigned officers of Red Metal Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(a)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2010 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and




(b)   Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  September 13, 2010








/s/ Caitlin Jeffs


Caitlin Jeffs, Chief Executive Officer and President











/s/ John Da Costa


John Da Costa, Chief Financial Officer
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Aamaxan Transport Group, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ended  October 31, 2006 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned,  in the capacity and on the
date indicated below,  hereby certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       1.     the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.     the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date: December 15, 2006                         /s/ Marc Juliar

                                                Marc Juliar
                                                Chief Executive Officer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer


























--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 8, 2014

No. 04-14-00323-CR

Steven BELTRAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 13, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 431439

The Honorable Monica A. Gonzalez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED. Time is 

extended to September 22, 2014.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of September, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 10.11**COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS OF CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS**On December 17, 2007, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Bank of Granite Corporation (the“Company”) and its banking subsidiary, Bank of Granite (the “Bank”), acting upon the recommendationof the Compensation Committee of the Board, approved the base salaries of certain executiveofficers of the Bank for 2008, with the base salary for the chairman remaining unchanged at hisrequest, the base salary for the president and chief executive officer increasing to $225,000, thebase salary for the chief financial officer increasing to $185,000, and the base salary for thechief information officer increasing to $140,000. The base salary for the president and chiefexecutive officer of the Company’ s mortgage banking subsidiary remains under review.Also, on December 17, 2007, the Board acting upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committeeof the Board, agreed that the executive incentive compensation structure for certain executiveofficers of the Bank for 2008 will remain unchanged from 2007.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

In the Matter of A. A. R., a Juvenile, 

 

 Appellant

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00051-CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 1400329)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until August 13, 2015. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Veronica Teresa Lerma, the Appellant’s attorney, 

prepare the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 13, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of July, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.