alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 549 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 549

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 9, 2020.
Whereas the principle that an informed and engaged electorate is critical to a 
        vibrant democracy is deeply rooted in our laws of free speech and 
        underpins the virtues on which we established our Constitution, ``in 
        Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic 
        Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general 
        Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our 
        Posterity * * *'';
Whereas having independent, diverse, and local media that provide exposure to a 
        broad range of viewpoints and the ability to contribute to the political 
        debate is central to sustaining that informed engagement;
Whereas it is in the public interest to encourage source, content, and audience 
        diversity on our Nation's shared telecommunications and media platforms;
Whereas the survival of small, independent, and diverse media outlets that serve 
        diverse audiences and local media markets is essential to preserving 
        local culture and building understanding on important community issues 
        that impact the daily lives of residents;
Whereas research by the American Society of News Editors, the Radio Television 
        Digital News Association, the Pew Research Center, and others has 
        documented the continued challenges of increasing diversity among all 
        types of media entities;
Whereas with increasing media experience and sophistication, it is even more 
        important to have minority participation in local media to ensure a 
        diverse range of information sources are available and different ideas 
        and viewpoints are expressed to strengthen social cohesion among 
        different communities; and
Whereas the constriction in small, independent, and diverse media outlets and 
        limited participation of diverse populations in media ownership and 
        decisionmaking are combining to negatively impact our goal of increasing 
        local civic engagement and civic knowledge through increased voter 
        participation, membership in civic groups, and knowledge of local 
        political and civil information: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) reaffirms its commitment to diversity as a core tenet of the 
        public interest standard in media policy; and
            (2) pledges to work with media entities and diverse stakeholders to 
        develop common ground solutions to eliminate barriers to media 
        diversity.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Scout Acquisition, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott Baily,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Scott
                Baily
              Scott
                Baily
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              September
                15, 2006
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 13, 2015

No. 04-15-00274-CV

EX PARTE Pierre R. PION

Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

On May 4, 2015, relator Pierre R. Pion filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus 

complaining of the trial court’s order finding him in contempt and authorizing his confinement. 

The court subsequently abated the habeas corpus proceeding to allow the newly elected judge of 

the trial court to reconsider the predecessor judge’s decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 7.2(b).

On June 1, 2015, the court received an order from the trial court, vacating the order 

complained of in this original proceeding. Having obtained the relief requested in his petition, 

the prior abatement of this proceeding is LIFTED and the petition for writ of habeas corpus is 

DISMISSED AS MOOT. The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on July 13, 2015.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011-CI-16008, styled Rhonda Gay Pion v. Pierre R. Pion, pending in the 

407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Janet Littlejohn presiding.
Exhibit 99.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I,  Quentin T. Kelly  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted  pursuant to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the
Annual  Report of  WorldWater  Corp.  on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended
December 31, 2002 fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained
in such Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB fairly  presents in all material  respects
the financial condition and results of operation of WorldWater Corp.



By:  /s/ Quentin T. Kelly
     ----------------------------------
Name:  Quentin T. Kelly
Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

Dated:  March 28, 2003
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of iBroadband, Inc., on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Matthew Hutchins, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sections 906 of the Sabanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in al material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IBroadband, Inc.





By/s/ Matthew Hutchins





Chief Financial and Executive Officer



June 27, 2006
RECEIVED COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 7/15/2015 ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Scout Acquisition, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher Kelly, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Christopher KellyChristopher
      KellyPrincipal
      Executive OfficerAugust  11,
      2010
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1410
SERGEI VLADIROVICH PETRENKO, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A72-415-219) Submitted: April 15, 1997 Decided: April 29, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sergei Vladirovich Petrenko, Petitioner Pro Se. Richard Michael Evans, Anthony Wray Norwood, Ellen Sue Shapiro, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Sergei Petrenko petitions for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying asylum and withholding of deportation. Our review of the record discloses that the Board'sdecision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Petrenko v. INS , No. A72-415-219 (B.I.A. Mar. 13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of Cayden L.R. Jefferson County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Melissa R., Appellant.

[977 NYS2d 664]

Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Scudder, EJ., Smith, Centra and Lindley, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-21030

Conference Calendar

 

JOE H. MACK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

F. FIGUEROA; M. BROCK; L. ARNOLD; JAMES HOSEA, Captain;

B.M. VINCENT; DR. DAVID LE; NURSE ALLEN; MS. RICHARD; 

MR. J. ENSON; MS. LOVELADY; RICHARD THALER, Warden; TIMOTHY

SIMMONS, Warden; ROBERT CHANCE, Warden; TIMOTHY MASSEY, Captain;

HIRSCH, Lieutenant; DRAKE, Sergeant; STIGERS, Correctional

Officer; DENNIS, Correctional Officer; PARNELL, Correctional

Officer; DEAN, Sergeant; MILLER, Sergeant,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-98-CV-2550

- - - - - - - - - -

August 23, 2001

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Joe Henry Mack, Texas prisoner # 671331, appeals the

dismissal of his complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1985. The

district court, sua sponte, dismissed the suit for failure to

state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) because Mack failed

to allege a conspiracy. See Newberry v. East Texas State Univ.,
No. 00-21030 

- 2 -

161 F. 3d 276, 281 (5th Cir 1998). Mack did not establish a

claim under § 1985(3) as he did not allege a race-based

conspiracy and could not have alleged a viable conspiracy claim

had he been given the opportunity to amend his complaint. 

Bazrowx v. Scott, 136 F.3d 1053, 1054 (5th Cir. 1998); Jones v.

Greninger, 188 F.3d 322, 327 (5th Cir. 1999). 

 Mack has at least two verified strikes against him. Mack v.

Mohr, No. 98-40375 (5th Cir. Feb. 9, 1999)(unpublished). Mack

has acquired another strike as a result of the district court’s

dismissal of the instant complaint under Rule 12(b)(6), which we

now AFFIRM. Mack may no longer proceed IFP in any civil action

or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any

facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d

383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). 

 AFFIRMED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) BAR IMPOSED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, NCI-ARRA P30 Biomedical Research Core Centers Review.                    

*Date:*                         July 20-21, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Marriott Bethesda North Hotel & Conference Center, Bethesda, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Bratin K. Saha, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Program Coordination and Referral Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8041, Bethesda, MD 20892. (301) 402-0371.                         *sahab@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: June 17, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-14699 Filed 6-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 23.1







                               Independent Auditors' Consent



The Partners
FFP Partners, L.P.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (No.  33-73170) of FFP Partners,  L.P. of our report dated March 17, 1998,
relating  to  the  consolidated  balance  sheet  of  FFP  Partners,  L.P.  and
subsidiary  as of December 28, 1997,  which report  appears in the 1997 annual
report on Form 10-K of FFP Partners, L.P.





                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Fort Worth, Texas
April 13, 1998
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of mPhase Technologies, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ronald A.
Durando, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ronald A. DurandoRonald A. Durando
Chief Executive Officer

February 15, 2011

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

# AGENCY:

Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces a change in benefit period eligibility under the EB program for Kentucky.

The following change has occurred since the publication of the last notice regarding Kentucky's EB status:
      - Kentucky has modified its law by adding a total unemployment rate (TUR) trigger retroactive to February 1, 2009. As a result, Kentucky has retroactively triggered “on” to an extended benefit period for weeks of unemployment beginning February 22, 2009, and “on” to a high unemployment period (HUP) for weeks of unemployment beginning April 12, 2009. Eligible unemployed workers will be able to collect up to an additional 20 weeks of unemployment insurance benefits.

## Information for Claimants

The duration of benefits payable in the EB program, and the terms and conditions on which they are payable, are governed by the Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, as amended, and the operating instructions issued to the states by the U.S. Department of Labor. In the case of a state beginning an HUP, the State Workforce Agency will furnish a written notice of potential entitlement to each individual who has exhausted all rights to regular benefits and is potentially eligible for EB (20 CFR 615.13(c)(1)). Persons who believe they may be entitled to EB or who wish to inquire about their rights under the program should contact their State Workforce Agency.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Scott Gibbons, U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Workforce Security, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Frances Perkins Bldg. Room S-4231, Washington, DC 20210, telephone number (202) 693-3008 (this is not a toll-free number) or by e-mail:                         *gibbons.scott@dol.gov*.                    

Signed in Washington, DC, this 19th day of June 2009.

Douglas F. Small,

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-14974 Filed 6-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6**  **194**

HAIBER V. MONTEHERMOSO , P etitioner

- Appellant ,

v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , Respondent

- Appellee
. Appeal from the United States District Court for the West ern District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Robert J. Conrad , Jr. , Chief District Judge. ( 3:11

- cv - 00291

- RJC )

Submitted : March 29, 2012 Decided: April 3, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per cur iam opinion

.
Haiber V. Montehermoso , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Haiber V. Montehermoso seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petitio n. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional r ight. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatab le or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is de batable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Montehermoso has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we den y a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Montehermoso’s pending motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the3 materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSE D
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

July 16, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00555-CR

IN RE ANTHONY RICHARD WOODARD, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

351st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1390747

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 30, 2015, relator Anthony Richard Woodard filed a petition for writ 

of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see 

also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel Stan 

Stanart, Harris County Clerk, to transmit to the Court of Criminal Appeals a copy 

of relator’s application for writ of habeas corpus, any answers filed, and a 

certificate reciting the date upon which the trial court found that no controverted, 
2

previously unresolved facts material to the legality of relator’s confinement exist. 

See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 § 3(c) (West 2015). 

This court’s mandamus jurisdiction is governed by Section 22.221 of the 

Texas Government Code. Section 22.221 expressly limits the mandamus 

jurisdiction of the courts of appeals to: (1) writs against a district court judge or a 

county court judge in the court of appeals’ district; and (2) all writs necessary to 

enforce the court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221. The 

county clerk is not a district court or county court judge in this court’s district, and 

relator has not shown that the issuance of a writ compelling the requested relief is 

necessary to enforce this court’s appellate jurisdiction.

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of 

jurisdiction.

 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).