alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**POWER      OF ATTORNEY**

|  /s/                Alan M. Bennett Alan                M. Bennett2           |  /s/                Linda Johnson Rice Linda                Johnson Rice2  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  /s/                Domenico De Sole Domenico                De Sole1    |  /s/                William H. Waltrip William                H. Waltrip2  |
|  /s/                Paul A. Friedman Paul                A. Friedman1    |  /s/                Barry W. Wilson Barry                W. Wilson3        |
|  /s/                Jonathan S. Linen Jonathan                S. Linen3  |  /s/                Kenneth L. Wolfe Kenneth                L. Wolfe1      |
|  /s/                Ruth R. McMullin Ruth                R. McMullin1    |  /s/                Ronald L. Zarrella Ronald                L. Zarrella4  |
<PAGE>   1


Exhibit 21.  Subsidiaries of Registrant.

        University Bank, a Michigan state chartered bank.

        Midwest Loan Services, Inc., a Michigan Corporation (80% owned by Bank)

      Varsity Funding Services, L.L.C., a Michigan Limited Liability Company
         (99% owned by Bank and 1% owned by Company)

      Varsity Mortgage, L.L.C., a Michigan Limited Liability Company (100% of
         the voting Interests owned by Bank and 100% of the non-voting Interests
         owned by three employees)

      Arbor Street, L.L.C, a Michigan Limited Liability Company (98% owned by
         Bank)

      University Insurance & Investment Services, Inc., a Michigan Corporation
         (100% owned by Bank)

      University Insurance Center, Inc., a Michigan Corporation (100% owned by
         University Insurance & Investment Services, Inc.)







                                      -81-
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of LifeCare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, W. Earl Reed,
III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 220, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2007



/s/ W. EARL REED, IIIW. Earl Reed, IIIChief Executive Officer
@conference{1207996,
  author = {Robert B. Bohn},
  title = {The Path to Cloud Federation through Standardization},
  year = {2022},
  month = {2022-11-25 05:11:00},
  publisher = {International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), Jeju, KR},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=956269},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTC55196.2022.9952660},
  language = {en},
}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                        1,478,616
<SECURITIES>                  3,132,752       <F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        18,177,975      <F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                4,003,906           
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                18,802,917                   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         431,973
<BONDS>                       0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      18,370,944      <F3>
<OTHER-SE>                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  18,802,917                                       
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              2,564,708       <F4>
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 2,102,291       <F5>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              (354,319)       <F6>
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               0
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  816,736
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0
<FN>
<F1>   "SECURITIES" REPRESENTS INVESTMENTS IN JOINT VENTURE
<F2>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
BUILDING]
<F3>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERS CAPITAL
<F4>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
INCOME
<F5>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES
<F6>   "OTHER EXPENSES" REPRESENTS EQUITY INTEREST IN JOINT
       VENTURES' NET INCOME
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
mine_ex101.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 



	

Minerco Resources, Inc


20 Trafalgar Square, Suite 455


Nashua, NH 03063

	














July 26, 2013


 


VIA FACSIMILE (516) 498-9894


 


ASHER ENTERPRISES, INC.


1 Linden Pl., Suite 207


Great Neck, NY. 11021


Attn: Curt Kramer, President







Re: Notice of Repayment of Convertible Promissory Note


 


Dear Mr. Kramer:


 


Pursuant to Section 1.9 of the Convertible Promissory Note dated February 4, 2013 with Asher Enterprises, Inc. in the principal amount of $42,500 (the “Note”), please be advised that Minerco Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) is exercising its right, on not less than three (3) trading days prior written notice to you, to prepay the outstanding principal and accrued interest on the Note in full.  This prepayment notice is being delivered to you as the holder of the Note at your registered address.  This letter shall serve as written notice of the prepayment of the Note as delivered to you in accordance with Section 4.2 of the Note.







We acknowledge and agree that on or before August 3, 2013, the optional prepayment date, we will make payment to your order of an amount equal to 175% multiplied by the sum of: (w) the then outstanding principal amount of this Note plus (x) accrued and unpaid interest on the unpaid principal amount of this Note to the Optional Prepayment Date plus (y) Default Interest, if any, on the amounts referred to in clauses (w) and (x) plus (z) any amounts owed to the Holder pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.4(g) of the Note.  All capitalized terms have the meaning set forth in the Note.







Thank you.


 


Sincerely,


 







 


John Powers


President


 


cc:           Naidich Wurman Birnbaum & Maday, LLP (via facsimile (516) 466-3555)


Gracin & Marlow, LLP (via facsimile (212) 208-4657)
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Imperiali, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the year ended August 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Imperato,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Daniel
      ImperatoDaniel
      ImperatoPrincipal
      Financial OfficerJuly
      15, 2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER AMENDING RULES 1120, 1210, 

1240, 1242, 1330, 1408, 1409, 1512, 

1514, 1515, 1608, 1609, 1610, 1611, AND

1635 AND ADOPTING NEW RULE 1149 

OF THE RULES OF JUVENILE COURT 

PROCEDURE 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 669

SUPREME COURT RULES

DOCKET 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of July, 2015, upon the recommendation of the Juvenile 

Court Procedural Rules Committee; the proposal having been published for public 

comment before adoption at 43 Pa.B. 6492 (November 2, 2013), in the Atlantic Reporter 

(Third Series Advance Sheets, Vol. 77, No. 3, December 6, 2013), and on the Supreme 

Court’s web-page, and an Explanatory Report to be published with this ORDER:

IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of 

Pennsylvania that the modifications to Rules 1120, 1210, 1240, 1242, 1330, 1408, 1409, 

1512, 1514, 1515, 1608, 1609, 1610, 1611, and 1635 and the adoption of new Rule 1149

of the Rules of Juvenile Court Procedure are approved in the attached form.

This ORDER shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall 

be effective October 1, 2015.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 123 (Monday, June 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15232]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


The Manufacturing Council: Meeting

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of an open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Manufacturing Council will hold an introductory meeting 
with the Secretary of Commerce to discuss topics related to the U.S. 
manufacturing sector.

DATES: July 20, 2009.
    Time: 10:30 a.m.-3 p.m.
    Location: U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 4832, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  J. Marc Chittum, The Manufacturing 
Council, Room 4043, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20230; telephone: 202-482-4501; and e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#55183427367b163d3c212120381538343c397b313a367b323a23"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="04496576672a476c6d707071694469656d682a606b672a636b72">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 23, 2009.
J. Marc Chittum,
Executive Secretary, The Manufacturing Council.
 [FR Doc. E9-15232 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I N THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT N OT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED A.L.P. , A CHILD , P etit i oner, v. Case No. 5D 2 2

- 1566 LT Case No s. 202 1- 78

- CJMA 2020

- 65

- CJMA STAT E OF FLORIDA , R espondent

. ________________________________/ Opinion filed July 1 5, 20 22 Petition for Writ of Prohibition, Joan A nthony, R espondent J udge. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Kelly M. Traynor, and Craig R. Atack, Assis tant Public Defenders, St. Augustine, for Petitioner

. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, Tallahassee , an d A llison L eigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Day tona Beach , for Respondent

. PER CURIAM.2 A.L.P

. petitions this court for a writ of prohibition following the denial of his motion to disqualify the presiding judge. We conclude that the motion to disqualify was legally sufficient and, accordingly, we grant the writ. A party may seek disqualification of a n assigned trial judge when the party reasonably fears that he or she will not receive a fair trial or hearing because of specifically described prejudice or bias of the judge. Fl a. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud

. Adm in

. 2.330(e)(1). “To be legally sufficient the motion to disqualify must establish a ‘ well

- gr ounded fear on the part of the movant that he will not receive a fair hearing, ’ and such fear must be objective rather than subjective.” Dumas v. State , 331 So. 3d 307, 308 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021) (quoting Lynch v. State , 2 So. 3d, 47, 78 ( F la. 2008 )). Here, the motion to disqualify alleged that the trial judge made specific comments, before evidence was ever introduced in the case, that would put a reasonably prudent person in well

- founded fear of not receiving a fair or impartial hearing. While a trial judge may form mental impressions and opinions during the course of a hearing, he or she may not, as it appears the presiding judge did here, prejudge the case. E.g., i d. ( citing Minaya v. State , 118 So. 3d 926, 929 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)). We grant the writ of prohibition and remand this case for assignment to a different judge. PETITION GRANTED. EVANDER, WALLIS, and NARDELLA, JJ ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Gregory John Fischer et al., Appellants, v New York State Board of Elections et al., Respondents.

Decided October 18, 2012

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
#### Cooperstown Holstein Corporation, Appellant, v Town of Middlefield, Respondent.

Submitted June 24, 2013;

decided August 29, 2013

Motion by New York Farm Bureau for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the brief is accepted as filed.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 699 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 699

 Celebrating the 100th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the 
                       United States and Poland.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2019

Mr. Burchett submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Celebrating the 100th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the 
                       United States and Poland.

Whereas 2019 marks the 100th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the 
        United States and Poland;
Whereas Poland is a strong ally of the United States on issues involving freedom 
        and liberty;
Whereas over 10 million United States citizens are of Polish-American ancestry;
Whereas the United States, in its own war for independence, was assisted by two 
        Polish leaders, Casimir Pulaski and Tadeusz Kosciuszko;
Whereas Pulaski died fighting for United States independence while Kosciuszko, 
        an engineer, was instrumental in helping George Washington win the 
        Battle of Saratoga and became known as the father of West Point, the 
        United States Military Academy;
Whereas the United States recognizes that during the past 100 years of 
        diplomatic relations, Poland was free for only 50 years, from 1919 to 
        1939 and from 1989 to present;
Whereas the United States always maintained diplomatic ties between our two 
        nations during the past 100 years despite challenging political 
        circumstances in Poland, even moving the United States embassy to London 
        during World War II;
Whereas many Poles gave their lives fighting for the Allies during World War II;
Whereas, in 1989, during the cold war and as Poland was transitioning from 
        Soviet rule, freedom leader Lech Walesa addressed the United States 
        Congress;
Whereas Poland is one of only seven North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) 
        member states to meet their two percent gross domestic product defense 
        spending requirement;
Whereas Poland deployed large numbers of members of its armed forces to the 
        international coalition in Iraq and to the NATO forces in Afghanistan; 
        and
Whereas Poland remains a strong ally to the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) celebrates the 100th anniversary of diplomatic 
        relations between the United States and Poland;
            (2) honors the service of the Poles who fought during World 
        War II, Afghanistan, and Iraq, including those who gave their 
        lives; and
            (3) honors the contributions by Polish Americans to the 
        United States.
                                 <all>
```
**ESCO,
      INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION**




**1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**




**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ESCO, Inc. (the “ Company ” ) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William T. Foley,
      President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/
                William T. FoleyWilliam
                T. FoleyPresident
                and Chief Financial OfficerAugust
                14, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      ESCO, Inc. and will be retained by ESCO, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Exhibit 12

Statement Regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(Dollar Amounts In Millions)





|                                                               | December 25, 2004 | December 27, 2003
|-------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------- | -----------------
|Income before Income Taxes and Minority Interest               | $246.8            | $197.0           
|Fixed Charges                                                  | 50.1              | 54.7             
|Current Period Amortization of Capitalized Interest            | 0.5               | 0.2              
|Capitalized Interest                                           | (1.1)             | (1.1)            
|Total Earnings as Adjusted                                     | $296.3            | $250.8           
|Fixed Charges                                                  |                   |                  
|Interest (Including Interest Expense and Capitalized Interest) | $  49.5           | $  54.2          
|Portion of Rents Representative of the Interest Factor         | 0.6               | 0.5              
|Total Fixed Charges                                            | $  50.1           | $  54.9          
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                             | 5.9               | 4.6              

``
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 123 (Monday, June 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15210]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,891]


Springs Global US, Inc., Sardis, MS; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended, an investigation was initiated on May 6, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Springs 
Global US, Inc., Sardis, Mississippi.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 18th day of May 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-15210 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 
 TO 

FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST 
 2003 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN 
 WHEREAS, the First Potomac Realty Trust 2003
Equity Compensation Plan (the “2003 Plan”) was approved by shareholders on September 25, 2003; 
 WHEREAS,
Amendment No. 1 to the 2003 Plan was approved by shareholders on May 20, 2005; 
 WHEREAS, Amendment No. 2 to the
2003 Plan was approved by shareholders on May 22, 2007; 
 WHEREAS, the Board does not intend, without the approval of
shareholders, to buy out, for a payment in cash, share options or share appreciation rights granted under the 2003 Plan when the exercise price of such stock option or base amount of such share appreciation right is equal to or greater than the
then-current fair market value of such stock option or share appreciation right; 
 WHEREAS, the Board wishes to amend the 2003
Plan in order to clarify that such buyouts are prohibited under the 2003 Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board has the authority to
amend the 2003 Plan pursuant to Section 17(a) of the 2003 Plan. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the 2003 Plan is amended as follows:

 1. Section 17(d) of the 2003 Plan, as amended, is hereby amended by the addition of the following sentence at the end
thereof: 
 “In addition, the Trust shall not buy out, for a payment in cash, an Option or SAR granted under the Plan when
the Exercise Price of such Option or the base amount of such SAR is equal to or greater than the then-current Fair Market Value, without the approval of shareholders.” 
 2. Except to the extent hereby amended and amended by Amendment No. 1 and Amendment No. 2, the 2003 Plan remains unchanged and shall continue in full force and effect. 

3. The effective date of this Amendment is July 23, 2013.
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.4




                ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SUPPORT AGREEMENT OBLIGATIONS



         This letter confirms the irrevocable acknowledgement and agreement of
Textron Inc. that any holder, or assignee of Notes issued by a subsidiary of
Textron Financial Corporation ("TFC"), which Notes are guaranteed by TFC, is
entitled to rely on, enforce, and enjoy all of the benefits and protections of
the provisions of the Support Agreement between TFC and Textron Inc. dated as of
May 25, 1994 as though (i) such holder or assignee were a direct lender of funds
to TFC for all purposes of such Support Agreement, and (ii) the Notes constitute
indebtedness for borrowed money outstanding of TFC for all purposes of such
Support Agreement.


                                             TEXTRON INC.



                                             By: /s/ Mary F. Lovejoy
                                                ----------------------------
                                             Name: Mary F. Lovejoy
                                                  --------------------------
Dated:  November 28, 2001                    Title: Vice President and Treasurer
                                                   -----------------------------