alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7085
CONRAD BURKE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHRIS WEBB; MAJOR ESPINOZA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:07-cv-00342-jlk) Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 18, 2007 Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Conrad Burke, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Conrad Burke appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burke v. Webb , No. 7:07-cv-00342-jlk (W.D. Va. July 19, 2007). We deny Burke’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Shearson  Select  Advisors  Futures Fund
L.P. (the  "Partnership")  on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Daniel R. McAuliffe,  Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director of
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Partnership.

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr
    Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
    Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
    Chief Financial Officer and Director
    March 27, 2003
# Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis

## What is acute disseminated encephalomyelitis? 

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is a neurological disorder characterized by brief but widespread attacks of inflammation (swelling) in the brain and spinal cord that damages myelin. Myelin is the whitish protective coating over nerves that helps with electrical nerve signaling. ADEM often appears following a viral or bacterial infection and sometimes (rarely) following a vaccination. It is sometimes misdiagnosed as the first severe attack of multiple sclerosis, since the symptoms and appearance of damage to the white matter may be similar. ADEM may be an autoimmune condition, in which the body's immune system mistakenly identifies and attacks healthy cells and tissue. Symptoms include: 
              - Loss of vision in one or both eyes due to inflammation of the optic nerve 
              - Weakness that may be severe 
              - Difficulty coordinating intended (voluntary) movement such as walking 
              - Rapid onset of fever 
              - Some degree of impairment of consciousness, perhaps as severe as coma 

ADEM can occur in people of any age, but it most often occurs in young children.  

Treatment is targeted at suppressing the immune system and inflammation in the brain using anti-inflammatory drugs such as corticosteroids. Some individuals may need plasma exchange (plasmapheresis) or immunoglobulin therapy. Most people with ADEM being to recover within days after treatment, and many will recover completely within six months. In rare instances, ADEM can be fatal.  

file-medical

## How can I or my loved one help improve care for people with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis?

Consider participating in a clinical trial so clinicians and scientists can learn more about ADEM and related disorders. Clinical research uses human volunteers to help researchers learn more about a disorder and perhaps find better ways to safely detect, treat, or prevent disease.

All types of volunteers are needed—those who are healthy or may have an illness or disease—of all different ages, sexes, races, and ethnicities to ensure that study results apply to as many people as possible, and that treatments will be safe and effective for everyone who will use them.

For information about participating in clinical research visit NIH Clinical Research Trials and You. Learn about clinical trials currently looking for people with ADEM at Clinicaltrials.gov. 
> Where can I get more information about acute disseminated encephalomyelitis?
 The following organizations and resources help people living with ADEM and their families, friends, and caregivers:

Genetic and Rare Diseases (GARD) Information Center

National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD)Phone: 203-744-0100 or 800-999-6673; 844-259-7178 Spanish

PubMed

United Leukodystrophy FoundationPhone: 815-748-3211 or 800-728-5483 

book-open
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of iBroadband, Inc., on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Matthew Hutchins, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sections 906 of the Sabanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in al material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

iBroadband, Inc.





By/s/ Matthew Hutchins









Chief Financial and Executive Officer

Date:  August 14, 2007
#### In the Matter of Deana R. Mensche, Appellant, v Debra I. Mensche, Respondent.

Submitted May 13, 2013;

decided June 26, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         192,569
<SECURITIES>                                    69,815
<RECEIVABLES>                                  466,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               737,144
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 768,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          247,430
<BONDS>                                      1,608,202
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,100
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,547,413)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   768,644
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,652
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               154,177
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                28,442
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             163,242
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (325,209)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (325,209)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (256,933)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              2,124,984
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,542,842
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 213 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 213

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Women Veterans Recognition 
                                 Week.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2019

 Mr. Lawson of Florida (for himself, Mr. Posey, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, 
 Mr. Waltz, Mr. Mast, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Dunn, Mr. Rutherford, Mr. Spano, 
 Mr. Diaz-Balart, Mrs. Murphy, Mr. Deutch, and Mr. Soto) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                               and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the goals and ideals of National Women Veterans Recognition 
                                 Week.

Whereas approximately 2,000,000 women in the United States are veterans;
Whereas Florida has the second largest population of women veterans in the 
        country;
Whereas in 1943, Congress introduced and passed legislation to establish the 
        Women's Army Corps, which provided full military status to women;
Whereas in 1967, the Women's Armed Services Integration Act was amended to lift 
        restrictions on the number and ranks of women in the military;
Whereas women are now the fastest growing segment of the veteran community;
Whereas women veterans have served in every branch of the military and in 
        various roles including gunners, police, pilots, truck drivers, and fuel 
        suppliers;
Whereas women bring a unique skill set and perspective to military service;
Whereas women veterans have selflessly and courageously served their country;
Whereas women veterans deserve to be recognized for their incredible sacrifices 
        and service; and
Whereas March 10, 2019, through March 16, 2019, would be an appropriate week to 
        recognize as National Women Veterans Recognition Week: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the goals and 
ideals of National Women Veterans Recognition Week.
                                 <all>
```
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 17, 2019.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D19-117

Lower Tribunal No. 19-262

________________



### Milagros Rodriguez

, Appellant,

vs.



### Griselda Stanfield

, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michaelle

Gonzalez-Paulson

, Judge.

Milagros Rodriguez

, in proper person.

Walter J. Harvey, School Board Attorney, and Jeff James, Assistant School

Board Attorney

, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and LOGUE and HENDON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.Upon our review of the record and the initial brief, we affirm on the

authority of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) (providing: “After

service of the initial brief

. . . , the court may summarily affirm the order to be

reviewed if the court finds that no preliminary basis for reversal has been

demonstrated.”)

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated   balance   sheet,   consolidated   statement  of  operations   and
consolidated statement of cash flows included in the Company's Form 10-K for the
period ending  December 31, 1998,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000810467
<NAME>                        Digital Link Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         296
<SECURITIES>                                   15,738
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                   540
<INVENTORY>                                    4,306
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               31,675
<PP&E>                                         11,792
<DEPRECIATION>                                 9,210
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 54,906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9,540
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       33,311
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,055
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   54,906
<SALES>                                        54,627
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               54,627
<CGS>                                          31,442
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  67,543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,196)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,720)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,248)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,472)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,472)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.71)
        


</TABLE>
@misc{1207291,
  author = {Meltem Sonmez Turan and Kerry McKay and Donghoon Chang and Jinkeon Kang and Noah Waller and John M. Kelsey and Lawrence E. Bassham and Deukjo Hong},
  title = {Status Report on the Final Round of the NIST Lightweight Cryptography Standardization Process},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-06-16 04:06:00},
  publisher = {NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936814},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8454},
  language = {en},
}
# STATEOFLOUISIANA COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS WILLIE THORNTON In Re: Willie Thornton, applying Judicial District Court, No. 11-15-0180. NO. 2022 KW 1230 

### JANUARY 17, 2023 for supervisory writs, 19th Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

### BEFORE: THERIOT, CHUTZ, AND HESTER, JJ. 

### WRIT GRANTED. The trial court is ordered to act on relator's application for postconviction relief, filed July 28, 2022, on or before March 16, 2023, if it has not already done so. A copy of the trial court's action shall be filed in this court on orbeforeMarch 23, 2023.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT 

### MRT WRC CHH
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Eugene K. Rowehl,certify that:

1.               Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kimball Hill, Inc.;

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)        All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: May 15, 2007
|        |   | /s/ EUGENE K. ROWEHL                                |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Eugene K. Rowehl                                    |
|   |   | *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
Order entered July 16, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00198-CR

RIGOBERTO VAZQUEZ HERNANDEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-59234-P

ORDER

We GRANT Official Court Reporter Lisabeth L. Kellett’s July 14, 2015 request for an 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be due FIFTEEN 

DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
## In The **Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo** 

________________________ No. 07 - 13 - 0096 - CV

________________________ In re Don Smith, Relator

________________________ 

### May 2 , 2013 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK , JJ. Pending before this court is the application of Don Smith (relator) for a writ of mandamus. He requests that we order the Hon. Douglas Woodburn, district judge of the 108 th Judicial District Court, to “set the complaint motion for a hearing and there after [sic] make a ruling and notify relator of said ruling . . . .” We dismiss the petition as moot. On April 18, 2013, we directed Judge Woodburn to respond to relator’s petition for mandamus. On April 30, 2013, Judge Woodburn filed his response wherein he granted relator’s motion and ordered the clerk to produce “non - certified copies of all documents contained in the Co urt’s file.” Nothing remains at issue. Accordingly, the2 application for writ of mandamus is denied as moot. See In re Duncan, 62 S.W.3d 333, 334 (Tex. App. – Houston [1 st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). Per Curiam
NO. 13-14-00128-CR 

RICHARD LEE MAZA § IN THE COURT OF 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL APPEALS 

 § 

STATE OF TEXAS § OF TEXAS 

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: 

Now comes Richard Lee Maza, Appellant in the above styled and numbered cause, 

and moves for an extension of time of 30 days to file a petition for discretionary review, 

and for good cause shows the following: 

1. On June 11, 2015, the Court of Appeals affirmed appellant's conviction. 

Richard Lee Maza v. State, 13–14–00128–CR, 2015 WL 3637821, (Tex. App. — Corpus 

Christi/Edinburg, no pet. h.). This petition is therefore due on July 13, 2015. 

2. Counsel has been unable to complete the petition for the following reasons: 

Today I was called by surprise to a hearing in the 410th Judicial District Court, 

Montgomery County, Texas. I worked approximately 12 hours yesterday, mostly on 

appellate matters. I worked about 18 hours the day before that on appellate matters. On 

Friday, I had been set for docket call early that morning, and worked past midnight on 

appellate matters and having jail conferences with clients I had not met yet. I prepared for 

trial Wednesday and Thursday, the latter day past midnight. I am appealing rejected habeas 

corpus relief in another case, which was rejected on Tuesday. If it is not given in a few 

days, her right to release will be completely moot. 

PD-0873-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 7/13/2015 6:03:52 PM

Accepted 7/15/2015 3:51:21 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
3. Defendant is currently incarcerated. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, appellant respectfully requests an 

extension of 30 days, i.e. until August 12, 2015, to file a petition for discretionary review. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Bob Mabry, Attorney at Law, PLLC 

304 North Main Street #6 

Conroe, Texas 77301-3002 

(936) 228-7796 

Fax 1-866-394-3113 

By: /s/ Bob Mabry 

Bob Mabry 

State Bar No. 12750980 

mabry.bob@gmail.com 

Attorney for Richard Lee Maza 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on July 13, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above and 

foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office, San Patricio County, 

P.O. Box 1393 Sinton, TX 78387, by fax to (361) 364-9490 before 5 PM Central Daylight 

Time. 

/s/ Bob Mabry 

Bob Mabry
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE: JOHN RISSIO, JOHN CAMERON, Appellants

______________________

2017

- 1090

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/672,385.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J AMES W. P ROSCIA , Brooks Kushman PC, Southfield, MI, argued for appellants. Also represented by M ARK A.

C ANTOR

.

K AKOLI C APRIHAN , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by

N ATHAN K. K ELLEY

, T HOMAS W. K RAUSE

, A MY J. N ELSON

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :P ER C URIAM (P ROST

, Chief Judge, N EWMAN and S TOLL

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

December 19, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court