alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ralph Cartagena, Appellant, v Jose N. Orellana Martinez et al., Respondents.

[976 NYS2d 662]

*522Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia Rodriguez, J.), entered July 12, 2013, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted.

Plaintiff established his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability in this action for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident. The record demonstrates that defendants’ truck hit plaintiffs stopped car in the rear, in stop-and-go traffic *(see Tutrani v County of Suffolk,*10 NY3d 906, 908 [2008]).

Defendants’ opposition fails to raise a triable issue of fact. Although defendant driver stated that plaintiffs car cut off his truck, he also testified that he did not see plaintiff’s vehicle until after the collision. Thus, defendants’ purported non-negligent explanation for the collision was speculative *(see Rodriguez v Chapman-Perry,*82 AD3d 638 [1st Dept 2011]; *Davis v Quinones,*295 AD2d 394 [2d Dept 2002]). Concur — Tom, J.P, Andrias, Saxe, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1060
ESKEDAR TESHOME-GEBREEGZIABHER, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: August 29, 2008 Decided: October 30, 2008 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, SHEDD, Circuit Judge, and Claude M. HILTON, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jason A. Dzubow, MENSAH, BUTLER & DZUBOW, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Acting Assistant Attorney General, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Stuart S. Nickum, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Eskedar Teshome-Gebreegziabher, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of her applications for relief from removal. Teshome challenges the determination that she failed to establish eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Teshome fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 23.2



IMMUCELL CORPORATION



CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-2631 and No. 333-65514) of ImmuCell Corporation of
our report dated January 24, 2003, relating to the financial statements and the financial statement schedule at December 31, 2002 and for both of the two years ended December 31, 2002, which appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS
LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




Boston, Massachusetts

March 25, 2004
@article{1211101,
  author = {Robert F. Berg and Charles S. Tarrio and Thomas B. Lucatorto},
  title = {Measurements and model of UV-induced oxidation of aluminum},
  year = {2023},
  number = {41},
  month = {2023-03-22 04:03:00},
  publisher = {Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=935448},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1116/6.0002432},
  language = {en},
}
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30600]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15073]



[[Page 30600]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial 
Research Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 17, 2009.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Victor Henriquez, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, DEA/SRB/NIDCR, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Room 668, Bethesda, MD 
20892-4878, 301-451-2405, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#452d202b372c343033052b2c2126376b2b2c2d6b222a33"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="167e7378647f67636056787f72756438787f7e38717960">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 18, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-15073 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
97-340.

#### State v. Cole.

Cuyahoga App. No. 96CA18. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Resnick and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
#### Midtown Distributors Corp., Appellant, v Mutual Central Alarm Services, Inc., Respondent.

[852 NYS2d 768]

Plaintiff’s claims that defendant burglar alarm company installed a different alarm system and a different number of sensors than provided in the parties’ contract, and failed to determine that the alarm had been tripped by burglars rather than birds, are barred by the exculpatory clause in the contract *(see Sue & Sam Mfg. Co. v United Protective Alarm Sys.,*119 AD2d 664 [1986]; *Nuri Farhardi, Inc. v Albany Ins. Co.,*137 AD2d 429 [1988]). Plaintiff does not allege such gross negligence as would avoid the exculpatory clause *(cf. Hartford Ins. Co. v Holmes Protection Group,*250 AD2d 526, 527-528 [1998]). Concur—Lippman, P.J., Andrias, Williams and McGuire, JJ.
#### THOMAS FRENCH & SONS, Limited, v. CARLETON VENETIAN BLIND CO., Inc.

No. 507.

District Court, E. D. New York.

Jan. 19, 1940.

H. C. Bierman, of New York City, for plaintiff.

John B. Cuningham, of New York City, for defendant.

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is an action for the infringement of U. S. Patent No. 2,156,150 issued April 25, 1939, and U. S. Patent No. 2,156,151 issued April 25, 1939; both patents were issued to Thomas French & Sons, Ltd., as assignee of George F. French.

Pursuant to Rule 36 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the defendant’s attorney served the plaintiff’s attorney with a request for admission of the following facts:

> “1. That the article by Edwin J. Gibbons, entitled ‘Ladder Tape — Narrow Fabric of Unique Construction’, photostatic copy of which is attached hereto, appeared at page 58 in the January 1933 issue of the periodical ‘Textile World’, published and distributed in January 1933.

> “2. That pages 117 and 118 of a book entitled ‘Technology of Textile Design’, by Posselt, photostatic copies of which pages are attached hereto, were published and distributed with said book in 1896.”

The facts sought are the dates of publication of two prior art references cited by the defendant in its answer.

The motion is based upon the grounds, (1) that the request did not set any time limit for reply by the plaintiff, and (2) that Rule 36 under which this admission is sought allegedly covers only those situations where the fact sought to be admitted is within the special and specific knowledge of the party requested to make the admission.

 In urging the absence of a time factor in the request as a reason for insufficiency, plaintiff attempts to convert a provision which puts a time limitation on the person required to admit the fact in*179to a limitation on the validity of the request itself. Niceties of argument which lose sight of the purposes of the rules should find no place in their interpretation. Moreover, under Rule 36, the court is given power to fix the time to which plaintiff has reference so that dismissal is hardly the remedy if the requirements of justice dictate otherwise.

So far as plaintiff’s second objection is concerned, again it seeks to narrow the intended scope of Rule 36. If there is reason why plaintiff is unable to deny or admit the fact in question, the remedy is via a sworn statement to that effect as prescribed in the rule. From the reasons set forth on this motion, however, it does not appear that such inability exists, since all the request necessitates is confirmation of a fact by momentary reference to the publication in question. If, perchance, there is actual inability to answer, plaintiff may set forth the reasons therefor in a sworn statement within ten days of the entry of the order. Its resort should not be, as attempted herein, to a motion to dismiss, for that represents a clear departure from the procedure outlined by Rules 36 and 37(c).

Settle order on notice.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sterling Financial Corporation (the Company)
for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Bradley Scovill, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: March 25, 2005
    By:
    /s/ J. Bradley ScovillJ. Bradley ScovillSenior Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
@article{1205866,
  author = {Imtiaz Hossen and Matthew Daniels and Martin Lueker-Boden and Andrew Dienstfrey and Gina Adam and Osama Yousuf},
  title = {Device Modeling Bias in ReRAM-Based Neural Network Simulations},
  year = {2023},
  number = {13},
  month = {2023-01-20 05:01:00},
  publisher = {IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=935560},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1109/JETCAS.2023.3238295},
  language = {en},
}
(More)

No. 18-1 For Immediate Release

 January 2018

RRB Offices Remain Open

The U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) has announced that during the lapse in 

Federal funding for certain Government operations which began January 20, ongoing 

benefit payments will continue and all RRB offices are expected to remain open.

RRB field offices, operating with reduced staffs, will continue to accept new claims 

for unemployment and sickness benefits, as well as new applications for retirement, 

survivor, and disability benefits. Persons receiving ongoing benefit payments are still 

obliged to report any events that would affect the payment of their benefits.

Individuals calling the RRB’s toll-free telephone number (1-877-772-5772) and 

having difficulty in reaching an agency representative are asked to be patient as offices are 

operating with a very limited staff.

# # #

U.S. Railroad Retirement Board

RRB News

844 North Rush Street Chicago, Illinois 60611-1275

www.rrb.gov

877-772-5772 general information

Public Affairs

312-751-4777 

opa@rrb.gov media inquiries
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          12,936
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                       665
<INVENTORY>                                      1,009
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,457
<PP&E>                                           1,865
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,868
<BONDS>                                             45
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,027
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,909
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,825
<SALES>                                         23,382
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,556
<CGS>                                            7,156
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,020
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 421
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,340
<INCOME-TAX>                                       534
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,806
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,806
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   $ 0.48<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $ 0.42<F1>
<FN>
<F1>INFORMATION HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO.128. BASIC AND DILUTED
EPS HAVE BEEN REPORTED IN PLACE OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**FINA L REPORT**  **1**

**REVISION OF**  **THE COMMENT**  **TO RULE OF EVIDENCE**  **605**

On January 8, 2014, the Court rescinded the then

-existing provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct effective July 1, 2014, and adopted new Canons 1 through 4 of the Code of Judicial Conduct of 2014, also effective July 1, 2014. See 44 Pa.B. 455 (January 25, 2014). At the direction of the Court, the Committee on Rules of Evidence identified and updated references to the Code of Judicial Conduct and Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges in the Comment to Rule 605.

1 The Committee’s Final Report should not be confused with the official Committee Comments to the rules. Also note that the Supreme Court does not adopt the Committee’s Comments or the contents of the Committee’s explanatory Final Reports.
@article{110941,
  author = {Mark McLinden and Cornelia Losch-Will},
  title = {Apparatus for Wide-Ranging, High-Accuracy Fluid p-ρ-T Measurements Based on a Compact Two-Sinker Densimeter},
  year = {2006},
  number = {39},
  month = {2006-09-28},
  publisher = {Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=50300},
  language = {en},
}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000811000
<NAME> 87B.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         268,802
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  180,715
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               449,517
<PP&E>                                      13,347,744
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,031,260
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,766,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,103
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,725,898
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,766,001
<SALES>                                      1,412,905
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,432,834
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,780,184
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (347,350)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (347,350)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (347,350)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (17.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Lb'LJJLJ 0 t= (JZL:MIJJ 1\L 

~u.s 1 ~ 1"-l , --rtx As 

zs-,u·rCf · 24 

·Ju \v 17, lO 1.( I 

'\[f: 1\ rt1 HurL b~ VI\~ LDk/ f: , Cf\LLS E. N D. ~ s-11 S ~ J, {JJU(l-1 0 rc__ r J- n I(\~\ ~ ~p~ ~_s, ·wrL- 2 -;, t "7 1 -Z Lf RECE~VED ~~ COUR1' Of CRt\\111N/\l A~feALS 

t\ be.\ ~cos+d. [CL,A), 

JUL 20 2015 

\) \ edS-e-. { \ nd· \h. you v 6-\-{ \ [.1 d I { tLO yJs . 'lou'( or~; C:l. J h~ \) u 

. t.\ \e_d .\ h ih L Couv-f 0 ( Cr; {") i ("\~ \ ~PPLJ IJ· ... tDrL. i Mo-rmN rDa 

LEf\ \/ e, -ro r:1. L r. ),J rtrr lJ f n Al\1 bfln u___s , . .r h \;J tt-- 2~ J £ 7 q-z Ll .? 

~n\1 5-\)~U 5 Jn d j (J'{ .dn \

1

1 d \ S DDS',-f, IJ n · I . J 

.I, --tr-ul v 6ppru·,~-rt ~ouv cDn.s·,~ud-\io h, , ./l.\1\Nic You. 

h~)t Cob bL:ss 'you, you( f.JM.,Iy Jn~ h·,ehJs .
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 24, 2014

p0616 

# Order

Clerk June 24, 2014

147581(88)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGA N,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147581

COA: 306191

Lapeer CC: 10

- 010499

- FC

ANDREW AUDIE WILLIAMS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 7,

2014 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
----

|                                              |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| Certification      pursuant to                    |
| 18      U.S.C. Section 1350,                      |
| as      adopted pursuant to                       |
| Section      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 |

|   |                                                                                                                                                                |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     | the      report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                             |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.     | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                                                                              |   |                                      |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      February 17,      2009         |   | s/s      Marshall T. Reynolds             |   |
|                                                                              |   | Marshall      T. Reynolds                 |   |
|                                                                              |   | Chairman      and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                                                              |   |                                      |   |
| Date:      February 17,      2009         |   | s/s      Larry A. Blount                  |   |
|                                                                              |   | Larry      A. Blount                      |   |
|                                                                              |   | Chief      Financial Officer              |   |
CITY OF NEW YORK
               DEPARTMENT OF PORTS, INTERNATIONAL TRADE & COMMERCE
                 Battery Maritime Building, New York, N.Y. 10004
                             Telephone: 212 806-6952

MICHAEL P. HUERTA
COMMISSIONER


                                                             December 16, 1988


  Mr. Frank Dayton
  New York Cross Harbor Railroad
  P,O.  Box 182
  Brooklyn, New York 11232


  Dear Mr. Dayton;

         The last permit issued to the New York Cross Harbor Railroad for use
and occupancy of the First   Avenue Yards (Brooklyn) commenced on September 1,
1984 and terminated on August 31, 1985 (Permit   #84-09-059030).  Since August
31, 1985 New York Cross Harbor Railroad has been on holdover status on a month
to month basis.  New York Cross Harbor Railroad's monthly payments for use and
occupancy of the First Avenue   Yards are up-to-date (as of November 1988).


                                                 Yours truly,

                                                 _______
                                                 Frank Salvia
                                                 Director of Transportation

  CC:      Anthony M. Riccio
            RaeAnn Caglione
            Michael F. Riccardelli (copy faxed)