alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6588

ALEXANDER CAMERON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. BOONE, Unit Manager; MS. ROBERTS, Counselor; MS. MACER, Counselor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-962-AM)

Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 1, 2000

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alexander Cameron, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Cameron Alexander, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district

court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000)

complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Cameron v. Boone, No. CA-99-962-AM (E.D. Va.

Apr. 6, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
cc: Hon. Nancy L. Porter, District Judge 

Elko County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Elko County District Attorney 

Elko County Clerk 

Jay Leslie Jim 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A e
@article{1212501,
  author = {Li-Tse Hsieh and Hang Liu and Yang Guo and Robert Gazda},
  title = {Deep Reinforcement Learning-based Task Assignment for Cooperative Mobile Edge Computing},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-08-30 04:08:00},
  publisher = {IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=934260},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2023.3270242},
  language = {en},
}
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30564]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1301-000]


GennConn Middletown, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

June 19, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
GenConn Middletown, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is July 20, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#33757661707c5d5f5a5d56604643435c414773555641501d545c45"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0d4b485f4e4263616463685e787d7d627f794d6b687f6e236a627b">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-15148 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jerry M. Kennelly, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Riverbed Technology, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Riverbed Technology, Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                    
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 31, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Jerry M. Kennelly                                              
|                       |  |  |  | Jerry M. Kennelly                                                  
|                       |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)

I, Randy S. Gottfried, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Riverbed Technology, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Riverbed Technology, Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                     
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 31, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Randy S. Gottfried                                              
|                       |  |  |  | Randy S. Gottfried                                                  
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 has been provided to Riverbed Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Riverbed Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to
which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
97-189.

#### Ohio Power Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.

Public Utilities Commission, No. 96-628-EL-AEC. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9                          
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000                   
                                     
<S>                             <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         123,835    
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          30,572    
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                49,900    
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    845,303    
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         573,109    
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           568,205    
<LOANS>                                      3,302,695    
<ALLOWANCE>                                     39,985    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,987,214    
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,897,201    
<SHORT-TERM>                                   369,396    
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             76,171    
<LONG-TERM>                                    194,390    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              444    
<PREFERRED>                                          0    
<COMMON>                                             0    
<OTHER-SE>                                     449,612    
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               4,987,214    
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                257,562    
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               23,274    
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                57,548    
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               338,384    
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             158,088    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             190,998    
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          147,386    
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,905    
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,043    
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                140,294    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 49,428    
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      33,046    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0     
<CHANGES>                                            0    
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,046    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.85    
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.81    
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.18    
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,033    
<LOANS-PAST>                                     6,207    
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0    
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 61,420    
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                42,143    
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,481    
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,418    
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               39,985    
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            39,985    
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0    
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0    
        

</TABLE>
96-2509.

#### State v. White.

Ashland App. No. 96COA01182. On motion for order requiring preservation of, and allowing inspection and copying of, videotape of trial. Motion denied.
@article{1212421,
  author = {Christina Bergonzo and Baikuntha Aryal and Ashutosh Rao},
  title = {Divalent ions as mediators of carbonylation in cardiac myosin binding protein C},
  year = {2023},
  number = {124},
  month = {2023-11-01 04:11:00},
  publisher = {Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936532},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2023.108576},
  language = {en},
}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000854062
<NAME>                              GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PTSP II-H

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                    95,694
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            128,199
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         223,893
<PP&E>                                 5,705,804
<DEPRECIATION>                         4,741,852
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         1,211,594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     12,701
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                             1,186,830
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           1,211,594
<SALES>                                  396,755
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         398,905
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            276,606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          122,299
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      122,299
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             122,299
<EPS-BASIC>                               1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 21
Subsidiaries of Arvin Industries, Inc.

Set forth below are the names of certain subsidiaries, at least 50%
owned, directly or indirectly, of the Company included in the
consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries in
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1995.  Certain subsidiaries, which when considered in the aggregate
would not constitute a significant subsidiary, are omitted from the list
below.

                                             State or Other
                                             Jurisdiction of
Company Name                                 Incorporation
------------                                 ---------------
Continuing Operations:
Maremont Corporation                         Delaware
Maremont Exhaust Products, Inc.              Delaware
Gabriel Europe, Inc.                         Delaware
Q International, Inc.                        Delaware
Gabriel Ride Control Products, Inc.          Delaware
Roll Coater, Inc.                            Indiana
Arvin International Holdings, Inc.           Indiana
AVM, Inc.                                    South Carolina
Arvin Automotive of Canada                   Canada
Arvin Ride Control Products, Inc.            Canada
Arvin Finance Company of Canada              Canada
Arvin Canada Holding, Ltd.                   Canada
Arvin de Mexico S.A. de C.V.                 Mexico
Arvin-Exhaust B.V.                           The Netherlands
Arvin International Holland B.V.             The Netherlands
Arvin-Exhaust S.A.                           Spain
A. P. Amortiguadores, S.A.                   Spain
Arvin France S.A.                            France
Arvin International U.K., PLC                United Kingdom
Arvin Exhaust Ltd.                           United Kingdom
Arvin Investment U.K., Ltd.                  United Kingdom
Timax U.K., Ltd.                             United Kingdom
Gabriel S. A. (Pty.) Ltd.                    South Africa
@article{1210001,
  author = {Hossein Dehghani and Ali Lavasani and Mohammad Hafezi and Michael Gullans},
  title = {Neural-network decoders for measurement induced phase transitions},
  year = {2023},
  number = {14},
  month = {2023-05-22 04:05:00},
  publisher = {Nature Communications},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=934964},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37902-1},
  language = {en},
}
#### The People of the State of New York, by Andrew M. Cuomo, Respondent, v Maurice R. Greenberg et al., Appellants.

Submitted February 11, 2013;

decided February 14, 2013

*1049Motion by States of Connecticut and Vermont Offices of the Attorneys General for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and nine copies filed within seven days.

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Eugene Malobrodsky, the Chief Executive Officer of INTELLIGENT BUYING. INC.  (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 13th day of August 2008.



/s/Eugene Malobrodsky

_________________________



Eugene Malobrodsky

Principal Executive Officer







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Intelligent Buying, Inc. and will be retained by Intelligent Buying, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
@conference{1207266,
  author = {Akobuije Chijioke and Richard A. Allen and Steven E. Fick and David Long and Benjamin Reschovsky and Jared Strait and Randall P. Wagner},
  title = {Optical-cavity-based primary sound standard},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-02-01 05:02:00},
  publisher = {28th International Congress on Sound and Vibration 2022 (ICSV28), Singapore, SG},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=934484},
  language = {en},
}
#### Betty Rainey, Appellant, v Frawley Plaza, LLC, et al., Respondents/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Iveragh Construction Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[975 NYS2d 877]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered January 11, 2013, which granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Dismissal of the complaint was appropriate in this action where plaintiff was injured when she allegedly slipped and fell on dust while descending stairs in the lobby of the building in which she lived. Defendants Frawley Plaza, LLC, Putnam Holding Corp., and UA Development Corp. were the owners and property managers of the building, and Iveragh Construction Corp. was performing renovations in the building. Defendants submitted evidence that they lacked notice of the allegedly defective condition by showing that the twice-daily cleaning schedule of the lobby was followed on the day of and the day before plaintiffs fall *(see Rodriguez v New York City Hous. Auth.,*102 AD3d 407 [1st Dept 2013]).

Plaintiffs opposition failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to notice. In the same vein, plaintiffs claim that Iveragh caused and created the dust condition was speculative *(see Morales v Foodways, Inc.,*186 AD2d 407 [1st Dept 1992]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, DeGrasse, Freedman and Gische, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection
with the Annual Report of Cardiff International, Inc. (the Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended herein as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Alex Cunningham, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
or the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------











| | Cardiff International, Inc.
| | ---------------------------
| |                            
| | By:                        
| |                            



Date:
April 17, 2018
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Quentin T. Kelly certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
report of WorldWater & Power Corp. on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operation of WorldWater & Power Corp.

| |  | By:    | /s/QUENTIN T. KELLY                  
| |  | ------ | -------------------------------------
| |  | NAME:  | Quentin T. Kelly                     
| |  | Title: | Chairman, Principal Executive Officer

Dated:
November 1, 2007

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This
certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-KSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

---



QuickLinks