alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 17, 2015

No. 04-14-00621-CV

IN THE INT OF CJT, A Child,

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 7,848

Honorable H. Paul Canales, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The two appellees in this appeal, Francisco Tovar Guajardo and Irma Perez Chapa, are 

represented by separate appellate counsel. Both appellees’ briefs were originally due to be filed 

in this appeal on May 18, 2015. Both appellees’ first motions requesting an extension of time

were granted, extending the deadline to June 17, 2015. 

Both appellees also filed a second motion requesting an additional extension of time to 

file their briefs until July 17, 2015, for a total extension of sixty days. By order dated June 17, 

2015, the motions were granted. This court’s order stated, “THIS IS THE FINAL 

EXTENSION OF TIME THAT APPELLEES WILL BE GRANTED. Appellees’ briefs

must be filed by July 17, 2015, or this appeal will be set “at issue” and submitted without briefs

filed by appellees.”

On July 14, 2015, both appellees filed a third motion for extension of time requesting an 

additional thirty-day extension to file their briefs until August 17, 2014. The motions are

DENIED. The clerk of the court is instructed to set the appeal “at issue.” The appellees may file 

a motion requesting permission to file their briefs prior to the submission of the appeal; however, 

the granting of such a motion will be at the court’s discretion, and the appellees’ briefs must be 

filed simultaneously with the filing of the motion.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Viktor R. Uehlinger,Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Premier Commercial Bancorp;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b). [IntentionallyOmitted]

c) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function);

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols which over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.
| Date: November 13, 2006 |                     |
|-------------------------|--------------------------|
|                    | /s/ Viktor R.  Uehlinger |   |
|                    | Viktor R.  Uehlinger     |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 10.20**

 

**AMENDMENT TO THE**

**STOCK OPTION GRANT AGREEMENT**

 

This Amendmentto the Stock Option Grant Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made effective as of January 1,2009, by and between Neiman Marcus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (formerlyknown as Newton Acquisition, Inc.) (the “Company”) and Burton M. Tansky(the “Participant”).

 

W I T N E S S E T H:

 

WHEREAS, theCompany and the Participant entered into a Stock Option Grant Agreement (the “Agreement”)effective as of November 29, 2005, pursuant to the terms of the NewtonAcquisition, Inc. Management Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and

 

WHEREAS, the Company has amended the Plan for compliance with InternalRevenue Code Section 409A and the Treasury Regulations thereunder; and

 

WHEREAS, theCompany and the Participant now desire to amend the Agreement for compliancewith Internal Revenue Code Section 409A and the Treasury Regulationsthereunder;

 

NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the parties do hereby agree asfollows:

 

1.             The last sentence of Paragraph 8 ofthe Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

 

It is intendedthat the Option be exempt from Code Section 409A, and this Agreement shallbe administered and construed to the fullest extent possible to reflect andimplement such intent.

 

2.             By execution of this Amendment theParticipant hereby consents to the amendment of the Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A.

 

3.             Except as otherwise specificallyset forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remainin full force and effect.

 

----

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to beexecuted on this the 10th dayof December, 2008.

 
| ** ** | ** ** | **  NEIMAN  MARCUS, INC.**         |
|------------|------------|----------------------------------------------|
|       |       |                                         |
|       | By:        |   /s/  Nelson  A. Bangs  |
|       | Its:       |   Senior  Vice President           |
|       |       |                                         |
|       |       |                                         |
| ** ** | ** ** | **  PARTICIPANT**                  |
| ** ** | ** ** | ** **                                   |
|       |       |   /s/  Burton  M. Tanksy |

 

2

----
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Reportof Shearson Select Advisors Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the yearending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

|          |                                                                                                                     |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.  | The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and |

|          |                                                                                                                                                        |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.  | The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership. |

    

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.                Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officer andDirector

    

March 31,2005                                Date

----
@conference{11771,
  author = {Solomon Woods and Stephen Carr and Adriaan Carter and Timothy Jung and Simon Kaplan and Raju Datla},
  title = {Calibration of Ultra-Low Infrared Power at NIST},
  year = {2010},
  number = {7742},
  month = {2010-07-20},
  publisher = {Proceedings of SPIE, San Diego, CA},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=906008},
  language = {en},
}
Exhibit
 32



CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
 connection with the report on Form 10-QSB of High End Ventures, Inc.
 for the quarterly period endedJune
 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
 Commission on the date hereof, I, Nadir Walji, do hereby
 certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
 my knowledge:

| | (1) | This report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in this report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuer at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the small business issuerfor the period covered by this report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:
 August7, 2008



/s/
 Nadir Walji

Nadir
 Walji

Chief
 Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



This
 certification accompanies this report pursuant to §906
 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by
 the small business issuer for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall
 not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of
 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report),
 irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement
 required by §906 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished
 to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



12
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31.2
Form 10-KSB
Cardiff International, Inc.
File No. 000-49709


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Gary R. Teel, Chief Financial Officer of Cardiff, Inc., certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Cardiff
International, Inc;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

      4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

      b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)    disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

      5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

      a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Dated: April 18, 2007                 By: /s/ Gary R. Teel
                                      Chief Financial Officer/Secretary/Chairman
#### Philip Caprio et al., Appellants, v New York State Department of Taxation and Finance et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Decided February 12, 2013

Appeal transferred, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, to the Appellate Division, First Department, upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie when questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, §§ 3 [b] [2]; 5 [b]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]).

Judge Rivera taking no part.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00377-CR

JUAN COLUMBUS MILES, JR. APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 1249446D

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Juan Columbus Miles, Jr. entered a plea of guilty on May 29, 

2012, to assault on a family member with a prior conviction. The trial court 

placed Miles on deferred adjudication community supervision for five years. 

Later, on July 8, 2013, the State petitioned the trial court to proceed to 

adjudication. At the revocation hearing, Miles entered open pleas of true to four 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

of the State’s allegations. After hearing Miles’s testimony, the trial court 

adjudicated Miles guilty of assault on a family member with a prior conviction and 

sentenced him to seven years’ incarceration. This appeal followed.

Miles’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw 

and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel avers that in his professional 

opinion, the appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s brief and motion meet the 

requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of 

the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. See 386 

U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). This court informed Harris that he may file a 

pro se brief, but he did not do so. The State did not submit a brief as well.

Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on 

the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this 

court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record. See 

Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 

904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only then may 

we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–

83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree with 

counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in 

the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 

S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 
3

684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to 

withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/s/ Bill Meier

BILL MEIER

JUSTICE

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MEIER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: July 9, 2015
NIGC NOTICE OF INQUIRY AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION 

MEETING JANUARY 11, 2011 SAN DIEGO 

Introduction

• Augustine has always fully supported the NIGC MICS as it currently exists 

having originally adopted it in July of 2002 and continued its use with the 

amended version in July 10, 2006 by resolution 7.02 with the approval of NIGC. 

• Augustine recognizes that 25 CFR 514.1 empowers the NIGC to access fees 

including annual fees. Therefore Augustine voluntarily submits our annual audit 

to NIGC to verify the accuracy of our gross gaming revenue.

• Augustine has always made available to NIGC agents the annual audit for review 

and examination.

• Augustine has also always endeavored to maintain complete transparency with 

both the State and NIGC.

Augustine State Compact

• Augustine’s Class III Tribal State Compact Sec.7.4.3 requires that we make 

available all applicable records to the State Gaming Agency necessary for 

completion of any investigation of the Tribe’s compliance with its Compact.

• Additionally the Tribal State Compact Sec. 8.1.8 requires that an annual audit be 

conducted by an independent certified public accountant, in accordance with the 

auditing and accounting standards for audits of casinos of the American Institute 

of Certified Public Accountants.
Pg. 2 

CGCC-008

• The State of California has already adopted the NIGC MICS as a uniform state 

wide regulation.

• Therefore Augustine feels there is no need for the NIGC to conduct actual audits 

of California Gaming Tribes which would in actuality create an unnecessary 

redundancy and additional burden and expense for both the Tribes and NIGC.

• The California Tribal State Compact contains a definition of Class III gaming 

device “Net Win”. That definition recognizes the right of a tribe to deduct the 

WAP operators fees be they fixed or a percentage. Therefore the NIGC proposal 

to define WAP contracts as “Management Agreements conflicts with the language 

of the California Tribal State Compact.

Recommendations

• Augustine suggests the NIGC continue in its valuable efforts to update the NIGC 

MICS.

• Augustine suggests the NIGC publish updated MICS proposals that are the 

combined work product of NIGC Advisory Committees made up of tribal gaming 

representatives nationwide and post them as bulletins or advisories as opposed to 

regulations. 

Clay Lambert 

Executive Director 

Augustine Gaming Commission
CERTIFICATION
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                          SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-H ("Issuer") for the period
ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies  with the  requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the information  contained  in  the Report fairly  presents,  in all
            material   respects,   the  financial   condition  and   results  of
            operations of the Issuer.

      Dated this 13th day of August, 2002.

                              GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II-H
                              ("Issuer")

                              //S//Dennis R. Neill
                              -------------------------------------
                              Dennis R. Neill
                              President (Chief Executive Officer)

                              //s//Craig D. Loseke
                              -------------------------------------
                              Craig D. Loseke
                              Chief Financial Officer
@misc{1215321,
  author = {Joshua D. Kneifel and Priya Lavappa},
  title = {Energy Price Indices and Discount Factors for Life-Cycle Cost Analysis – 2023: Annual Supplement to NIST Handbook 135},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-09-18 04:09:00},
  publisher = {NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=956573},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.85-3273-38},
  language = {en},
}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

KRISTIN NEWVINE,

Petitioner

v.

JERSEY SHORE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 662 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of April, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.