alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND
1995.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         518,645
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               875,645
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 875,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,887
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,125
<OTHER-SE>                                     789,633
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   875,645
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,637
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               423,684
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (231,423)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (231,423)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                278,026
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,603
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 123 (Monday, June 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15282]



[[Page 31035]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than July 13, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Charles A. Adams, Mattoon, Illinois, to individually acquire 10 
percent or more of the voting shares of First Mid-Illinois Bancshares, 
Inc., Mattoon, Illinois, and thereby indirectly acquire shares of First 
Mid-Illinois Bank and Trust, National Association, Mattoon, Illinois, 
and as part of a group acting in concert with Holly A. Bailey, Linda K. 
Adams, Howell Paving, Inc., and Howell Adams Foundation, all of 
Mattoon, Illinois, and Craig H. Adams, Woodside, California; to retain 
more than 10 percent of the voting shares of First Mid-Illinois 
Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain shares of First Mid-
Illinois Bank and Trust, National Association.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 24, 2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-15282 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit
31.1




CERTIFICATION




I, Daniel
Imperato, certify that:




1.   I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Imperiali,
Inc.;




2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.   The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:


(a)    
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)   
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)    
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.   The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a)    
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b)    
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:  May
      14, 2009
              /s/Daniel
      ImperatoDaniel
      ImperatoPrincipal
      Executive Officer
@article{11801,
  author = {Solomon Woods and Timothy Jung and Adriaan Carter and Raju Datla and Stephen Carr},
  title = {Experimental measurements and noise analysis of a cryogenic radiometer},
  year = {2014},
  month = {2014-07-10},
  publisher = {Review of Scientific Instruments},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=914915},
  language = {en},
}
@article{1213756,
  author = {Arun Moorthy and Edward Erisman and Anthony J. Kearsley and Yuxue Liang and Edward Sisco and William E. Wallace},
  title = {On the challenge of unambiguous identification of fentanyl analogs: exploring measurement diversity using standard reference mass spectral libraries},
  year = {2023},
  number = {68},
  month = {2023-07-11 04:07:00},
  publisher = {Journal of Forensic Sciences},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936752},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15322},
  language = {en},
}
NUMBER 13-15-00269-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

ELVIRA J. GARCIA, Appellant,

v.

PATRICIA ELIZABETH HOLSEY, ANA K. GARCIA, 

BETH DENISE GARCIA, ANDREW R. GARCIA,

EDWARD C. GARCIA, RAYMOND J. GARCIA, 

JULIE M. CRANE, DUVE A. REYES, MARY G. FLORES, 

WILLIAM A. FLORES, WILMA A. GARCIA, 

MARY ELLEN FLORES, LOUIS M. FLORES, 

ANNETTE FEE, AND ROSEMARY GARCIA, Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 135th District Court

of Goliad County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes

Order Per Curiam
2

Appellant Elvira J. Garcia has appealed an amended order for issuance of a 

temporary injunction signed on May 28, 2015 in favor of appellees, Patricia Elizabeth 

Holsey, Ana K. Garcia, Beth Denise Garcia, Andrew R. Garcia, Edward C. Garcia, 

Raymond J. Garcia, Julie M. Crane, Duve A. Reyes, Mary G. Flores, William A. Flores, 

Wilma A. Garcia, Mary Ellen Flores, Louis M. Flores, Annette Fee, and Rosemary Garcia. 

Currently before the Court is appellant’s emergency motion to stay. According to the 

emergency motion to stay, appellees have filed a motion for contempt against appellant 

seeking to have the trial court hold her in contempt for violating the temporary injunction

that is the subject of this appeal. Appellant asserts that this motion is set for hearing on 

Monday, July 12, 2105 at 9:00 a.m.1 Citing Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 29.4, 

appellant contends that this Court should stay the contempt proceedings because only 

this Court has the power to enforce an order subject to interlocutory appeal. Appellant 

thus urges this Court to stay any hearing seeking to hold her in contempt for violation of 

the temporary injunction.

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 29.4 provides that:

While an appeal from an interlocutory order is pending, only the 

appellate court in which the appeal is pending may enforce the order. But 

the appellate court may refer any enforcement proceeding to the trial court 

with instructions to: 

(a) hear evidence and grant appropriate relief; or 

(b) make findings and recommendations and report them to the 

appellate court.

Tex. R. App. P. 29.4; see In re Sheshtawy, 154 S.W.3d 114, 121 (Tex. 2004) (orig. 

 

1 We assume that appellant is referring to Monday, July 13, 2015.
3

proceeding); see e.g., In re Bannwart, 439 S.W.3d 417, 422 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st 

Dist.] 2014, orig. proceeding). 

Having examined and fully considered appellant’s motion for emergency relief,

we hereby DENY the motion and we refer any enforcement proceeding to the trial court 

with instructions to hear evidence and grant appropriate relief. See id. R. 29.4(a); In re 

Sheshtawy, 154 S.W.3d at 121.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM 

Delivered and filed the

10th day of July, 2015.
Exhibit 32

Section 1350 Certifications

 

**STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned is the Financial Officer of Imperiali Inc. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Imperiali Inc for the quarter ended November 30, 2006. 

 

The undersigned certifies that such 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Imperiali Inc as of November 30, 2006.

 

This Certification is executed as of January 24, 2007.

 

|   | /s/ Charles A. Fiscina                      |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | CFO                                         |
|   | (Principal Executive and Financial Officer) |

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to us, Inc. and will be retained by Imperiali Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 

 

----
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1543. INLAND FRESH SEAFOOD CORPORATION OF AMERICA,

INC. v. TOP QUALITY RECRUITMENT, INC.

Upon consideration of the above-styled case, the appeal is thereby

DISMISSED as improvidently granted.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 11, 2021

08/11/2021
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00355-CV

WILLIAM M. WINDSOR,

Appellant

v.

SAM ROUND,

Appellee

From the 378th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 88611

ORDER

A document entitled “Appellant’s Brief” was received from appellant, William 

M. Windsor and filed with the Court on June 25, 2015. Windsor’s brief in this matter is 

premature. Neither the clerk’s record nor the reporter’s record in this appeal have been 

filed. An appellant’s brief is not due until 30 days after the clerk’s record or the 

reporter’s record is filed, whichever is later. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6. Because it was filed 

before the clerk’s record and reporter’s record were even prepared, the “brief” does not 
Windsor v. Round Page 2

contain the necessary references to the official record to be a proper brief. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.1. Accordingly, the “Appellant’s Brief” is stricken. 

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Brief stricken

Order issued and filed July 16, 2015
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 14, 2015

No. 04-15-00096-CV

ALS 88 DESIGN BUILD LLC,

Appellant

v.

MOAB 

MOAB CONSTRUCTION CO.,

Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-03033

Honorable Gloria Saldana, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received 

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellant’s brief 

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to August 14, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Tom Hall

Law Office of Thomas C. Hall, P.C.

115 East Travis Street, Suite 700

San Antonio, TX 78205

Regina Criswell

Law Office of Regina Bacon Criswell

Carriage Place

San Antonio, TX 78250
The HONORABLE JOHN R. TUNHEIM, United States District Judge 1

for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.

 The Honorable Elsijane T. Roy, United States District Judge 2

for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

___________

No. 96-1617

___________

Huntsman Farms, Inc.; Keith *

Huntsman; Howard Huntsman; *

Wesley Huntsman; Tommy Wachtel, *

*

Appellants, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Arkansas.

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Mike Espy, Secretary, United *

States Department of *

Agriculture, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: December 11, 1996

 Filed: January 14, 1997

___________

Before WOLLMAN and MURPHY, Circuit Judges, and TUNHEIM, District 1

Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Huntsman Farms, Inc., and four persons who rented land from Huntsman

Farms--Keith Huntsman, Howard Huntsman, Wesley Huntsman, and Tommy Wachtel-

-appeal from the district court's decision in favor of the Secretary of

2

Agriculture. Appellants brought an action for review of the Secretary's

decision denying certain commodity deficiency payments for the crop years

1986 and 1987 and denying interest on payments made for crop year 1987.

Having considered the arguments and briefs submitted by the parties, we
-2-

affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's comprehensive, wellwritten opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Appellants' motion to supplement the record is denied.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 52 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                   House Calendar No. 3
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 52

                           {Report No. 116-3]

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 28) 
making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2019, and for 
 other purposes, and providing for consideration of motions to suspend 
                               the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2019

   Ms. Scanlon, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 28) 
making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2019, and for 
 other purposes, and providing for consideration of motions to suspend 
                               the rules.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 28) 
making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2019, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the joint 
resolution are waived. The joint resolution shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against provisions in the joint resolution 
are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
joint resolution and on any amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations or their respective designees; and (2) one motion to 
recommit.
    Sec. 2.  It shall be in order at any time through the legislative 
day of January 25, 2019, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the 
House suspend the rules as though under clause 1 of rule XV. The 
Speaker or her designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or his 
designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to 
this section.
                                                   House Calendar No. 3

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. RES. 52

                           {Report No. 116-3]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 28) 
making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2019, and for 
 other purposes, and providing for consideration of motions to suspend 
                               the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 16, 2019

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
VI 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 361 

For the relief of Guy Vang, Genevieve Chong Foung, Caroline Vang, and 

Meline ‘‘Melanie’’ Vang. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2009 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Guy Vang, Genevieve Chong Foung, 

Caroline Vang, and Meline ‘‘Melanie’’ Vang. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, for the purposes of the Immigration and Na6 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Guy Vang, Gene7 vieve Chong Foung, Caroline Vang, and Meline ‘‘Melanie’’ 

8 Vang shall be deemed to have been lawfully admitted to, 

9 and remained in, the United States, and shall each be eli10 gible for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•S 361 IS

1 admitted for permanent residence under section 245 of the 

2 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) upon 

3 filing an application for such adjustment of status. 

4 (b) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub5 section (a) shall apply only if the application for adjust6 ment of status is filed with appropriate fees not later than 

7 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

9 Upon the granting of permanent resident status to Guy 

10 Vang, Genevieve Chong Foung, Caroline Vang, and Meline 

11 ‘‘Melanie’’ Vang, the Secretary of State shall instruct the 

12 proper officer to reduce by 4, during the current or next 

13 following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas 

14 that are made available to natives of the country of the 

15 birth of Guy Vang, Genevieve Chong Foung, Caroline 

16 Vang, and Meline ‘‘Melanie’’ Vang under section 

17 202(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

18 U.S.C. 1152(a)(2)). 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
@conference{1212486,
  author = {Seulki Cho and Alexander Zaslavsky and Curt A. Richter and Jacob Majikes and James Alexander Liddle and François Andrieu and Sylvain Barraud and Arvind Balijepalli},
  title = {High-Resolution DNA Hybridization Kinetics Measurements with Double Gate FD-SOI Transistors},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-01-23 05:01:00},
  publisher = {Proceedings of the IEEE Electron Device Meeting, San Francisco, CA, US},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=935166},
  language = {en},
}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7519

ERNEST A. MARTIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES KEELING, Assistant Warden of Programs;

EDDIE L. PEARSON; JAMES A. SMITH; R. ROBINSON;

P. MELVIN; J. FRANKLIN; J. PENZA; T. JONES;

M. SHURTS; J. GUTHRIE; J. AMISON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-215-AM, CA-97-338-AM, CA-97-400-AM)

Submitted: March 31, 1998 Decided: April 20, 1998

Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest A. Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Martin v. Keeling, Nos. CA-97-215-AM; CA-97-338-AM; CA-97-

400-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 12, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED