alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joshua Liner, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 524]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J.), rendered July 7, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), burglary in the third degree and petit larceny, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 3V2 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence, including defendant’s possession of two knives during the commission of a crime and the fact that he reached to his right side where one knife was located, supported the inference that he intended to use them unlawfully *(see People v Malik,*21 AD3d 779 [2005], *lv denied*6 NY3d 778 [2006]; *Matter of Aida S.,*189 AD2d 818 [1993]).

Two trespass notices barring defendant from entering a chain of drugstores were properly admitted as business records and did not violate defendant’s right of confrontation *(see Crawford v Washington,*541 US 36, 56 [2004]; *People v Grogan,*28 AU3d 579, 581 [2006]), even assuming that one purpose of such a notice is to prove, at a later trial, that the defendant knew his or her entry was unlawful *(State v Bellerouch,*129 Wash App 912, 916-917, 120 P3d 971, 974-975 [2005]). The notices, generated long before defendant’s arrest, were not prepared by or on behalf of law enforcement, nor were they created solely for the purpose of criminal prosecution *(compare People v Pacer,*6 NY3d 504, 509-512 [2006]; *People v Rogers,*8 AD3d 888, 891-892 [2004]). We decline to decide whether other bases exist for finding the Confrontation Clause inapplicable to these documents, since no such theories were raised by the People at trial or ruled upon by the court.

We have considered defendant’s remaining claims, including *480those contained in his pro se supplemental brief, and find them without merit. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Friedman, Gonzalez, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Bell Atlantic - Pennsylvania, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 33-50869) and Form S-3
(File No. 33-55252) of our report dated February 9, 1998, on our audits of the
financial statements and financial statement schedule of the Company as of
December 31, 1997 and December 31, 1996, and for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 1997, which report is included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.

/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

2400 Eleven Penn Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 25, 1998
Exhibit
32








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) of
Sterling Banks, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, we, Robert H King, President and Chief Executive Officer, and R.
Scott Horner, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Robert H. King
            
            /s/ R. Scott HornerRobert
      H. King
            
            R.
      Scott HornerPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
            
            Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer








Date:
March 8, 2010
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Entech Solar, Inc. and Subsidiaries 

We hereby consentto the use in Registration Statement No. 333-168598, 333-152429, 333-66484, 333-95253. 333-95241 and 333-24693 of Entech Solar, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report dated March 24, 2011 (which report expressed an unqualifiedopinion and included an explanatory paragraph relating to Entech Solar, Inc.’s ability to continue as a going concern), appearing in the 2010 Annual Report (Form 10-K) of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

/s/ EisnerAmper LLP 

Edison, New Jersey

March 24, 2011
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 194 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Education and 

Labor in the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2019 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia (for himself and Ms. FOXX of North Carolina) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Education and Labor in the One Hundred Sixteenth 

Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Education and 

4 Labor (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the 

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, 

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the 

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $15,519,002 for the One Hundred 

9 Sixteenth Congress. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 194 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $7,638,701 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2019, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2020; and 

7 (2) not more than $7,880,301 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2020, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2021. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2
                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory Adams, certify that:

1. I have reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Online  Originals,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and I have:

    a)    designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during  the  period in which  this  quarterly
          report is being prepared;

    b)    evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c)    presented in this report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
          the disclosure  controls and procedures  based on our evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation,  to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's  board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

    a)    all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

    b)    any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes
in  internal  controls  or in other  factors  that  could  significantly  affect
internal  controls  subsequent  to the  date  of  our  most  recent  evaluation,
including any  corrective  actions with regard to significant  deficiencies  and
material weaknesses.



Date:    April 11, 2008


By:       /s/ Gregory Adams
         ------------------
         Gregory Adams
         Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 118 (Monday, June 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 29510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14633]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5300-N-09]


Notice of Availability: Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for 
HUD's Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Public and Indian Housing Family Self-
Sufficiency Program under the Resident Opportunity and Self-Sufficiency 
(ROSS) Program

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian 
Housing, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HUD announces the availability on its Web site of the 
application information, submission deadlines, funding criteria, and 
other requirements for the FY2009 Public and Indian Housing Family 
Self-Sufficiency Program under the Resident Opportunity and Self-
Sufficiency (ROSS) Program. The NOFA makes approximately $12 million 
available under the Department of Housing and Urban Development 
Appropriations Act 2009 (Pub. L. 111-8, approved March 11, 2009). 
Applicants for assistance under this NOFA must address applicable 
requirements in the Notice of HUD's Fiscal Year 2009 Notice of Funding 
Availability (NOFA) Policy Requirements and General Section to the 
HUD's FY2009 NOFAs for Discretionary Programs (General Section) 
published on December 29, 2008 (73 FR 79548), as amended on April 16, 
2009 (74 FR 17685). Applicants should take particular note that they 
should follow the application submission instructions contained in this 
NOFA and not use those in the General Section. The notice providing 
information regarding the application process, funding criteria and 
eligibility requirements is available on the HUD Web site at http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning the Public 
and Indian Housing Family Self-Sufficiency Program under the Resident 
Opportunity and Self-Sufficiency (ROSS) Program, contact Anice 
Schervish, Urban Revitalization Division, Office of Public and Indian 
Housing, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh 
Street, SW., Room 3236, Washington DC 20410; telephone number 202-402-
2341 (this is not a toll-free number). Persons with speech or hearing 
impairments may access this telephone number via TTY by calling the 
toll-free Federal Information Relay Service during working hours at 
800-877-8339.

    Dated: June 8, 2009.
Paula O. Blunt,
General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing.
[FR Doc. E9-14633 Filed 6-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00124-CR

Hector RAMIREZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR2894

Honorable Kevin M. O’Connell, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, appellant’s motion to dismiss is 

GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED December 9, 2015.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

‘
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6196

DAVIS YOUNG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM D. CATOE, Director, South Carolina

Department of Corrections; M. WHIPPLE,

Captain; RONALD JACQUES, Major; P. DOUGLAS

TAYLOR, Warden; MARGARET HARRISON, DHO; JANE

DOE; JOHN DOE, all sued in their individual

capacities; BERNICE SMITH, Sergeant; ARON

BROWN, Sergeant; T. ALEXANDER, Sergeant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-00-3778-6-12AK)

Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 30, 2002

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Davis Young, Appellant Pro Se. Isaac McDuffie Stone, III, Francesca

Macchiaverna, LAW OFFICE OF DUFFIE STONE, Bluffton, South Carolina,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Davis Young appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. Appellant’s case

was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that

relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely

objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of

a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this

warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge’s

recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s

recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the

substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by

failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Justapor Ranch, 

L.C.Appellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 15, 2015

No. 04-14-00905-CV

ESCONDIDO RESOURCES II, LLC,

Appellant

v.

JUSTAPOR RANCH, L.C.,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CV7-001396-D1

The Honorable Joe Lopez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellee’s second motion for extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED. Appellee’s 

brief is due on August 14, 2015. No further extensions will be granted.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 268 

Expressing support for the designation of Cesar Chavez’s birthday, March 

31, 2019, as National Border Control Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2019 

Mr. GOSAR submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of Cesar Chavez’s 

birthday, March 31, 2019, as National Border Control Day. 

Whereas Cesar Chavez was born on March 31, 1927, in 

Yuma, Arizona; 

Whereas, in 1962, Chavez founded the National Farm Workers Association, which later became the United Farm 

Workers, to improve the wages and working conditions 

for American farmworkers; 

Whereas Chavez’s union drew on the imagery of civil rights 

to use nonviolence and mass mobilization to improve the 

conditions of persecuted and impoverished American 

workers; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 268 IH 

Whereas Cesar Chavez believed that preventing illegal immigration was an essential prerequisite to improving the circumstances of American farmworkers; 

Whereas, in 1969, Chavez led a march to the Mexican border 

to protest illegal immigration, joined by Senator Walter 

Mondale and Martin Luther King’s successor as head of 

the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, Ralph 

Abernathy; 

Whereas Chavez noted that it is ‘‘almost impossible to start 

some effective program to get these people their jobs 

back from the braceros’’ once employers replace them; 

Whereas, in the 1970s, Chavez combined a campaign of identifying and reporting illegal workers with a campaign to 

boycott nonunionized farms in order to protect the labor 

of the unionized American worker; 

Whereas Chavez recognized that flooding the labor market 

with people from abroad undermines the unionized American worker; 

Whereas, in 1979, at the National Press Club, Chavez emphatically supported enforcement of immigration laws, 

stating that ‘‘people are being hurt and being destroyed, 

and with the complicity and with the help, of the Federal 

Government’’; and 

Whereas President Clinton recognized Chavez’s work saying, 

‘‘We can be proud of his enormous accomplishments and 

in the dignity and comfort he brought to the lives of so 

many of our country’s least powerful and most dispossessed workers’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 268 IH 

1 (1) supports the designation of National Border 

2 Control Day; 

3 (2) expresses strong support for Cesar Chavez’s 

4 fight to defend the interests of the American farm5 workers, and for his recognition that nonviolent ac6 tion could protect these workers against the business 

7 interests which would replace them with illegal for8 eign labor; and 

9 (3) encourages recognition and celebration of 

10 National Border Control Day with appropriate cere11 monies and activities. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6112
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NATHAN LOYAL HOWARD, a/k/a Nathan Hale, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CR-94-26, CA-96-415-1) Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: June 3, 1997 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathan Loyal Howard, Appellant Pro Se. John Castle Parr, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (1994), to modify or reduce his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Howard , Nos. CR94-26; CA-96-415-1 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 13, 1996). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BANTA CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                          40,571
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  210,275
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,564
<INVENTORY>                                     66,456
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               329,171
<PP&E>                                         640,461
<DEPRECIATION>                                 316,445
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 705,454
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          127,448
<BONDS>                                        134,121
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,100
<OTHER-SE>                                     405,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   705,454
<SALES>                                        794,472
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               794,472
<CGS>                                          636,128
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  636,128
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                92,497
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,894
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 59,657
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,957
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,957
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.15<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15<F1>
<FN>
<F1>RESTATED TO REFLECT THE IMPACT OF STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS NO. 128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE." THE EPS UNDER THE
"EPS-PRIMARY" TAG REPRESENTS BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>