alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sterling Financial
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"),
I, J. Bradley Scovill, Senior Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



Dated: March 12, 2004                By:   /s/ J. Bradley Scovill
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           J. Bradley Scovill
                                           Sr. Executive Vice President,
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
NO. 06-15-00091-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT TEXARKANA, TEXAS

CHRISTOPHER WAYNE WILDER, 

Appellant

VS. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

TO SAID HONORABLE COURT:

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT

James P. Finstrom, appointed counsel for Christopher Wayne 

Wilder, Appellant, moves the Court to allow him to withdraw from 

representation of Appellant in this cause and shows the Court that he 

is familiar with this case and represented the Appellant when he 

entered his plea of guilty and was placed on probation and has 

examined the record in this cause and is of the opinion that the 

appeal is without merit on direct appeal and that there are no grounds 

which would arguably support reversal of this conviction on direct 

appeal and, further, is of the opinion that Appellant’s pleas of true to 

ACCEPTED

06-15-00091-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

7/20/2015 8:37:05 AM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 7/20/2015 8:37:05 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
2

allegations numbered one, two, three, four and five in the State’s 

Petition to Revoke Probated Judgment in this cause together with his 

judicial confession when he entered his plea of guilty in this cause are 

wholly sufficient to support the order of the trial court revoking his 

probation. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, counsel for 

Appellant moves that he be permitted to withdraw from representation 

in this cause. 

Respectfully submitted, 

__/s/ James P. Finstrom_

James P. Finstrom 

Counsel for Appellant

202 S. Marshall, 

P.O. Box 276

Jefferson, Texas 75657

903-665-7111

Fax: 903-665-7167

Texas Bar #07038000

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that I have delivered a true copy of this brief to Hon.

Angela Smoak, counsel for the State, on this 17th day of July, 2015. 

__/s/ James P. Finstrom___

James P. Finstrom
EXHIBIT 99
                                                                      ----------



                              IMMUCELL CORPORATION




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ImmuCell Corporation (the
"Company") for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael F.
Brigham, President, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Michael F. Brigham
----------------------
Michael F. Brigham
President, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer
March 18, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 571 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 571

   Expressing support for the designation of September 24, 2019, as 
                  ``National Voter Registration Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 20, 2019

   Ms. Castor of Florida (for herself and Mr. Deutch) submitted the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing support for the designation of September 24, 2019, as 
                  ``National Voter Registration Day''.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses support for the designation of ``National 
        Voter Registration Day''; and
            (2) encourages each voting-eligible citizen of the United 
        States--
                    (A) to register to vote;
                    (B) to verify with the appropriate State or local 
                election official that the name, address, and other 
                personal information on record is current; and
                    (C) to go to the polls on election day and vote if 
                the voting-eligible citizen would like to do so.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of Exten Industries, Inc. on Form S-8 (No. 333-40752) of our report, which contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, dated January 9, 2004 on the consolidated financial statements of Exten Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of November 30, 2003 and 2002 and for the years then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended November 30, 2003.



J. H. COHN LLP



San Diego, California
January 9, 2004





- 17 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                          1,648,513
<SECURITIES>                    000
<RECEIVABLES>                   105,552
<ALLOWANCES>                    000
<INVENTORY>                     000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                000
<PP&E>                          50,301,247
<DEPRECIATION>                  (14,031,118)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  39,251,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           150,148
<BONDS>                         13,902,293
<COMMON>                        000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           000
<PREFERRED>                     000
<OTHER-SE>                      000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    24,617,777
<SALES>                         3,978,679
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                4,096,162
<CGS>                           000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,774,810
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2,134,772
<LOSS-PROVISION>                000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,087,561
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (900,981)
<INCOME-TAX>                    000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (900,981)
<DISCONTINUED>                  000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 000
<CHANGES>                       000
<NET-INCOME>                    (900,981)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.16)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                               Davox Corporation
                             List of Subsidiaries

        Name of Subsidiary                       Jurisdiction of Incorporation
        ------------------                       -----------------------------
  Davox (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd.                           Singapore
            Davox GmbH                                      Germany
        Davox (Canada) Inc.                               Nova Scotia
        Davox (UK) Limited                                  England
     Davox Sales Corporation                               Barbados
      Davox Belgium S.P.R.L.                                Belgium
Davox International Holdings, Inc.                       Massachusetts
 Davox Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.                           Mexico
   Davox Securities Corporation                          Massachusetts
       Davox do Brasil Ltda.                               Sao Paulo
   Davox (Australia) Pty Limited                        New South Wales
Davox Corporation Hong Kong Limited                        Hong Kong
Davox (Japan) Corporation (Branch)                           Tokyo
     Davox (Japan) Corporation                              Delaware
DAL 6.30.2013 EX 10.1








EXHIBIT 10.1




TERMS OF 2013 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD1  


		
	Participants:
	All members of Delta's Board of Directors (the “Board”) who are not employees of Delta (“Non-Employee Directors”).  These directors are:


	
		
	Roy J. Bostock
	Shirley C. Franklin

	John S. Brinzo
	David R. Goode

	Daniel A. Carp
	George N. Mattson

	David G. DeWalt
	Paula Rosput Reynolds

	William H. Easter III
	Kenneth B. Woodrow

	Mickey P. Foret
	 






		
	Type of Award:
	Restricted Stock, as defined and granted under the Delta 2007 Performance Compensation Plan (the “2007 Plan”).




		
	Grant Date:
	June 27, 2013




Number of
		
	Shares:
	The number of shares of Restricted Stock granted to each Non-Employee Director shall equal the result of the following formula:  $115,000 divided by Y, where




Y  =  the closing price of Delta Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, on the New York Stock Exchange on the Grant Date.


		
	Partial Shares:
	Any partial shares resulting from the above formula will be ignored and the aggregate shares of Restricted Stock for each Non-Employee Director will be rounded up to the nearest whole ten shares.


 
		
	Vesting:
	Each grant awarded to a Non-Employee Director under the terms of this Exhibit 1 (a “2013 Grant”) will vest (the “Vesting Date”) on the earlier of (1) June 27, 2014 and (2) the date of Delta's 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, subject to such Non-Employee Director's continued service as a member of the Board on the Vesting Date.


Accelerated
		
	Vesting:
	Notwithstanding the forgoing, accelerated vesting will occur prior to the Vesting Date as follows:  individual 2013 Grants shall immediately vest on the date such Non-Employee Director ceases to be a member of the Board due to death or Disability.  For purposes of the 2013 Grant, “Disability” shall mean the Non-Employee Director's inability to perform his or her duties as a member of the Board for a period of 180 or more days as a result of a demonstrable injury or disease.






_______________________________
1 In accordance with these terms, each Non-Employee Director received 6,160 shares of Restricted Stock on June 27, 2013.  This is equal to $115,000 divided by $18.69 (the closing price of Delta Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 27, 2013), rounded up to the nearest whole ten shares.











		
	Forfeiture:
	Except as expressly set forth above, a Non-Employee Director shall immediately forfeit any unvested Restricted Stock on the date such Non-Employee Director ceases to be a member of the Board for any reason, other than due to death or Disability.




		
	Dividends:
	In the event a cash dividend is paid with respect to shares of Delta Common Stock at a time during which the 2013 Grant is unvested, the Non-Employee Director will be eligible to receive the dividend when the 2013 Grant vests. 





2
@article{10331,
  author = {Brent Sperling and William Kimes and James Maslar and Pamela Chu},
  title = {Time-resolved Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy of the Gas-phase During Atomic Layer Deposition},
  year = {2010},
  number = {28},
  month = {2010-06-24},
  publisher = {Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1116/1.3455187},
  language = {en},
}
1

Filed 12/31/13 In re M.W. CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(El Dorado)

In re M.W. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile 

Court Law.

C072950

EL DORADO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF 

HUMAN SERVICES,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

J.B.,

Defendant and Appellant.

(Super. Ct. Nos. 

SDP20120019, SDP20120021, 

& SDP20120022)

On August 22, 2012, the juvenile court, in connection with these dependency 

proceedings brought on behalf of the minors, found Valarie B. to be the presumed parent 

of minors M.W., Ja.W., and D.W. Appellant filed a petition for writ of mandate in case 

No. C071961 challenging the juvenile court’s August 22, 2012, order declaring Valarie 

B. the minors’ presumed parent. Appellant also filed the instant appeal from the 

dispositional hearing on January 9, 2013.
2

The sole issue raised by appellant in this appeal is the juvenile court’s order 

declaring Valarie B. the minors’ presumed parent. Appellant contends the order was 

erroneous and must be vacated.

On November 20, 2013, this court filed its opinion in case No. C071961, directing 

the juvenile court to vacate that portion of its August 22, 2012, order which declared 

Valarie B. the presumed parent of minors M.W., Ja.W., and D.W. The peremptory writ 

and remittitur issued December 23, 2013. Accordingly, we dismiss the instant appeal as 

moot.1

DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed.

 BLEASE , Acting P. J.

We concur:

 HULL , J.

 MAURO , J.

 

1 This issue seems noncontroversial and the court has resolved it summarily in this 

opinion, in the interest of judicial economy. Any party aggrieved by this procedure may 

petition for rehearing. (Gov. Code, § 68081.)
Rail Employer Reporting Instructions

Part IV - Particular Types of Compensation Payments

Chapter 2: Miscellaneous Compensation

1

Definition of Miscellaneous Compensation

Miscellaneous compensation is any payment which is subject to Tier I taxes and is creditable as 

Tier I compensation, but cannot be credited as regular compensation. Miscellaneous 

compensation, as referred to in these instructions, must meet the following conditions:

• The payment is subject to railroad retirement tax; 

• The payment is remuneration for services rendered in an earlier year;

• The payment cannot be credited to the earlier year because the employee already has 

maximum Tier I compensation credit in that year; and 

• The payment cannot be credited to the year when the payment is made because no service 

was performed in the year of payment and the employer reports compensation generally 

on an earned basis. See Chapter 1 of this Part, for an explanation of earned basis.

Employers previously reported Miscellaneous Compensation on Form BA-10, "Report of Sick 

Pay and Miscellaneous Payments". Form BA-10 is now obsolete. Employers must use Form BA3, "Annual Report of Creditable Compensation" to report miscellaneous compensation that meets 

the above conditions. 

Adjustments to Miscellaneous Compensation will now be reported on Form BA-4, "Report of 

Creditable Compensation Adjustments". See Part V, Chapter 3 and 4 respectively, for 

instructions on completing Forms BA-3 and BA-4 to report Miscellaneous Compensation. 

Example of Miscellaneous Compensation

An employee resigns on 12/31/07 and retires on 01/01/08. He earned and received payments 

totaling $93,000 in 2007, and received a payment of $6,000 in March 2008 for his last pay period 

in 2007, for vacation pay and other benefits earned but not paid in 2007. Because the employer 

generally reports on an earned basis, the employer filed an adjustment increasing 2007 

compensation by an additional $4,500 bringing the total compensation for 2007 to the maximum 

of $97,500. The remaining $1,500 paid in 2008 is reported as miscellaneous compensation for 

2008.

Taxable and Creditable Miscellaneous Compensation

In the example, you will note that the entire $6000 paid in 2008 is subject to Tier I, Tier II, and 

Medicare taxes at the 2008 tax rate. While the taxable and creditable compensation are not 

always equal for each year, particularly for employers who report compensation on an earned 

basis, the amounts will usually be equal in the aggregate for all years. In the previous example, 

the creditable Tier I compensation (after the adjustment) for 2007 is $97,500 and $1,500 for 

2008. The total creditable compensation for the two years is $99,000. The taxable compensation 

for 2007 is $93,000; and $6000 for 2008 for a total of $99,000.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 17, 2015

No. 04-15-00251-CV

IN RE HEB GROCERY COMPANY, LP

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On July 13, 2015, appellate counsel for real party in interest Patricia Rani Spaulding filed 

a third unopposed motion for extension of time to file a response to the petition for writ of 

mandamus. The motion is GRANTED. A response on behalf of the real party in interest is due in 

this court no later than July 20, 2015.

It is so ORDERED on July 17, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013-CI-08676, styled Patricia Rani Spaulding v. HEB, Inc., HEB 

Grocery Company, LP; HEBCO GP, LLC and HEBCO Partners, Ltd., pending in the 285th Judicial District Court, 

Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Martha Tanner presiding.
@misc{1206486,
  author = {Alexander Maranghides and Shonali Nazare and Eric Link and Kathryn Butler and Erik L. Johnsson and Matthew Bundy and Artur A. Chernovsky and Frank Bigelow and Steven Hawks and William (Ruddy) Mell and Anthony Bova and Thomas Milac and William Walton and Bob Raymer and Frank Frievalt},
  title = {NIST Outdoor Structure Separation Experiments (NOSSE) with Wind},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-05-31 04:05:00},
  publisher = {Technical Note (NIST TN), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936733},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.2253},
  language = {en},
}
@article{1011,
  author = {Andrea Centrone},
  title = {Infrared Imaging and Spectroscopy Beyond the Diffraction Limit},
  year = {2015},
  number = {8},
  month = {2015-07-22},
  publisher = {Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anchem-071114-040435},
  language = {en},
}
M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 438TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on May 6, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or

reverse your judgment between

Stacy Joanna Mauricio, Appellant

V.

Rueben Mauricio, Appellee

No. 04-14-00880-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2014-CI-06556

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the

appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. Costs of appeal are

taxed against Appellant Stacy Joanna Mauricio.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on July 15, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-14-00880-CV

Stacy Joanna Mauricio

v.

Rueben Mauricio

(NO. 2014-CI-06556 IN 438TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

REPORTER'S RECORD

CLERK'S RECORD

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

INDIGENT

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51

FEE

$1,200.00

$93.00

$100.00

$20.00

$25.00

$50.00

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PARTIAL FR STACY MAURICIO

REGINA SCRIVNER

REGINA SCRIVNER

REGINA SCRIVNER

REGINA SCRIVNER

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this July 15, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
#### Segundo Once et al., Respondents, v Service Center of New York et al., Defendants, and 218 W 72nd St. Realty Corp. et al., Appellants.

Submitted December 10, 2012;

decided March 21, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that appellants have failed to show that the order sought to be appealed from is final as required by Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR) § 500.22 (b) (3).
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 708 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 708

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 19, 2019.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 3055) making appropriations for the 
Departments of Commerce and Justice, Science, and Related Agencies for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 2020, and for other purposes, with the Senate 
amendment thereto, and to consider in the House, without intervention of any 
point of order, a motion offered by the chair of the Committee on Appropriations 
or her designee that the House concur in the Senate amendment with an amendment 
inserting the text of Rules Committee Print 116-38 in lieu of the matter 
proposed to be inserted by the Senate. The Senate amendment and the motion shall 
be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Appropriations. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
motion to its adoption without intervening motion.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```