r ll 11170T 

## T

, MONTANA SUPREME COURT

IN THE MATITER OF: Cause No DN-19-06 EZRI FRIDDLE, AYOUTH IN NEED OF CARE. Cause No. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL


## NOV 0 7 2022 Bovv,n (21,2t-rr •a c . 

# FILED

Bowen Greenwood CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF MONTANA

COMES NOW Danny Friddle, Petitioner Pro Se, to petition this Honorable Court for appointment of new counsel in Cause No DN-19-06. FACTS 1) Petitioner has, concurrent with this filing, moved for dismissal of current/prior appointed counsel for cause. 2) Petitioner is currently incarcerated by the State of Hawai'i in an "out of state contract" Core Civic private prison facility, and housed in the state ofArizona. 3) Being incarcerated, Petitioner has no meaningful income. 4) Petitioner possess no material assets ofvalue, such as property, automobiles, etc. 5) Petitioner's access to legal materials relating to Montana statutes and
case law is non-existent. 6) Pursuant to Fact 5 above, there can be no expectation, regardless ofany level of skill possessed by Petitioner, that Petitioner would be able to reasonably represent himself. 7) Petitioner's financial circumstances have not changed in any significant way since the previous appointment ofcounsel provided Pursuant to Montana Code Annotated §§ 41-3-425(2) and 41-7-111.RELIEF Petitioner, in accordance with the above facts, requests this Honorable Court for appointment of counsel to represent Petitioner and Petitioners interests in both this appeal matter and, pursuant to the ruling on the motion to appeal the March 18, 2022 termination of Petitioner's parental rights, in Cause No. DN-19-06.

1 of 2 11/07/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0631 11/22/2022

### I declare, under the penalty ofperjury, that the above stated facts are true and

accurate to the best ofmy knowledge, and request reliefas described accordingly. DATED: October 25, 2022, Eloy, Arizona

(-- anny Fridffle Petitioner Pro Se

2 of 2

# FILED

Danny Friddle A6008921 Core Civic/Saguaro Correctional Center 1252 East Arica Rd Eloy, AZ 85131 

## NOV0 E3 0

' v ven G CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT • ,c r eo
_ STATE OF MONTANA Sta tA A,,

-."Orlfe rte 

## ?1022 Bowen Greenwood

MONTANA SUPREME COURT

IN THE MATTTER OF: Cause No DN-19-06 EZRI FRIDDLE, AYOUTH IN NEED OF CARE. Cause No. Dri MOTION FOR APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT

COMES NOW Danny Friddle, Petitioner Pro Se, to petition this Honorable Court for an appeal from thejudgment in Cause No DN-19-06, entered March 25, 2022, terminating Petitioner's parental rights effective March 18, 2022.

FACTS
1) Petitioner, Danny Friddle, is the biological father of Ezri Friddle. 2) Petitioner was a respondent in Cause No DN-19-06. 3) Between not beforeJune 6, 2019 and not after August 19, 2019, Petitioner was served by the Pinal County Sheriffs Department in Arizona providing notice of commencement of action against him in instant case as part of the case filed
on May 23, 2019 by the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, Child and Family Services Division ("CFSD"). 4) Petitioner was notified in an August, 13, 2019 letter from MichelleJ. Maltese ("Ms. Maltese") that Ms. Maltese had been appointed to represent Petitioner in instant case. 5) For the entire duration of her appointment as Petitioner's counsel, from August 2019 through March 2022, Petitioner received a total of four communications from Ms. Maltese, one letter dated August 13, 2019, received on or about August 19, 2019, one letter dated August 27, 2019, received on or about September 3, 2019, one letter dated September 27, 2019, received on or about October 1, 2019, and one letter dated March 10, 2022, received on March 15, 2022 (dates according to original letters
1 of8 11/07/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0631and Petitioner's facilitymail log).

6) Between August 2019 and March 2022, Petitioner contacted his counsel, Ms. Maltese, eight times, one letter sent leaving Petitioner's facility on or about August 21, 2019, one letter sent leaving Petitioner's facility on or about September 23, 2019,
one letter sent leaving Petitioner's facility on or about October 9, 2019, one letter sent leaving Petitioner's facility on or about December 13, 2019, one letter sent leaving Petitioner'sfacility on or aboutJuly 17, 2021, one letter dated February 16, 2022, which left Petitioner's facility on February 22, 2022, one letter dated February 28, 2022, which left Petitioner's facility on March 2, 2022, and one letter dated March 25, 2022, which left Petitioner's facility on March 18, 2022 (dates according to copies of original letters and Petitioner's facilitymaillog). 7) Following the letter received by Petitioner on or about October 1, 2019, Petitioner received no response from hisletters to Ms. Maltese until he threatened a complaint to the Montana State BarAssociation in hisletter sent on or about March 2, 2022. 8) Petitioner is housed at a prison facilitywhich utilizes a restricted phone/callinglist. 9) Due to administrative complications, Petitioner was/has been unable to add counsel, Ms. Maltese, to his facilityphone list, and as such is unable to call Ms. Maltese directly. 10) At no time did Petitioner receive any incoming "legal calls" from counsel, Ms. Maltese. 11) On or about September 3, 2019, the Court found that reunification efforts did not need to be made with regards to Petitioner in instant case. 12) Petitioner was notified ofthe September 3, 2019 decision in instant case bymeans ofMs. Maltese'sletter dated September 27, 2019, received on or about October 1, 2019. 13) Per documents served on Petitioner, motion to terminate Petitioner's parental rights was filedby CFSD on or about November 24, 2021. 14) Petitioner's counsel, Ms. Maltese, according to the Certificate of Service contained within the CFSD's motion for termination ofPetitioner's parental rights, was electronically served by e-mail. 15) Petitioner was served with the documents seeking the termination ofhis parental rights on or about February 16, 2022 by the Pinal County Sheriffs Department. 2 of816) MCA §§ 41-3-423(5) and 41-3-445(1)(a)(i)(A) establish a 30 day "statute of

limitations" for the CFSD to file for the terinination ofparental rights following a finding that reunification efforts are not required pursuant to MCA § 41-3-423. 17) Petitioner was not served anynotifications and/or motions relating to instant matter between the September 3, 2019judgment and the November 24, 2021 filingwith the court. 18) Petitioner's circumstances, which maybe held relevant to action(s) against Petitioner in Cause No. DN-19-06, have changed since the entry ofthe September 3, 2019judgment regarding reunification efforts not being made with Petitioner. 19) OnJune 22, 2021, Petitioner filedinitial appellate proceedings relating to his conviction for which he is currently incarcerated for. 20) Petitioner's currentincarceration, to include both the projected length of such incarceration and the chargesresulting in the incarceration, are two ofthe primary factors utilizedby the CFSD as grounds for the termination of Petitioner's parental rights. 21) Petitioner's proceedings filed in the State ofHawai'i include matters that,
on remand, mayprovide cause for a change injudgment, i.e., that Petitioner maybe found "not guilty" on the charges utilized as grounds in and for the CFSD's action seeking to terminate Petitioner's parental rights. 22) The period oftime between Petitioner's notification ofthe issues barring his "appearance" and the hearingterminating Petitioner's parental rightswas not
more than three days. 23) Petitioner received notice ofthe termination ofhis parental rights on April 4, 2022, which served as Petitioner's onlynotice ofthejudgment. 24) Petitioner originally submitted a motion to appeal thejudgment to the Montana ThirdJudicial District Court on May 2, 2022. 25) The original petition for appealwas, pursuant to ¶ 23 - 24 above and in accordance with the "prison mailbox rule," filed with the Montana ThirdJudicial District Court within 30 days. 26) Petitioner had, in his March 2, 2022 letter to Ms. Maltese, instructed that ifjudgmentwas entered against him, he intended it to be appealed. 27) Petitioner's counsel, Ms. Maltese, has not contacted Petitioner since March 10, 2022, neither regarding any appellate actions, nor even to notifyPetitioner ofthe March 18, 2022 judgment entered by the Montana ThirdJudicial District Court
3 of8terminating his parental rights.

28) Petitioner had instructed his counsel, Ms. Maltese, in his February 28, 2022 letter, that ifajudgment was entered under the circumstances as they existed (i.e., with the lack ofcommunication between Petitioner and his counsel, to include time to discuss and/or prepare any defense, and given the apparent violation ofthe applicable statute oflimitations as established by MCA §§ 41-3-423(5) and 41-3-445(1) (a)(i)(A)), that counsel was to file an appeal of any suchjudgment.
GROUND ONE Denial ofAccess to the Courts
29) Petitioner's presence was not facilitated at any ofthe court proceedings. 30) Petitioner was not provided details ofmissed proceedings, apart from outcomes/rulings, such as transcripts. 31) Petitioner was not provided information related to the CFSD's claim that Ezri Friddle's "selfharm" is directly causedbythe continuation ofhis paternal rights,
nor was Petitioner given the opportunity to confront this claim. 32) Petitioner was served notice ofthe CFSD's,motion seeking to terminate his parental rights on February 16, 2022. 33) Petitioner is currentlyincarceratedby the State ofHawai'i in a private prison in the state ofArizona. 34) Petitioner has no meaningful access to Montana statutes (Montana Code Annotated (MCA)) or case law. 35) Petitioner is reliant on written mail correspondence due to his current incarceration and facility restrictions, such as restricted calling lists. 36) Petitioner's parental rights were terminated bythe court effective March 18, 2022, 30 days after Petitioner first received notice ofthe motion to terminate his parental rights. 37) Petitioner was, pursuant to 1129 - 36 above, not given opportunityto investigate, prepare, and/or provide a defense against specific allegations made by the CFSD. 38) Petitioner was not given opportunity to appear at anyproceeding held in instant case, in spite ofhis desire to do so. 39) Petitioner's counsel, Ms. Maltese, related to Petitioner that she was having difficultywith Petitioner'sfacilityin scheduling legal calls/court appearancesby 4 of8phone in the letter dated March 10, 2022, receivedby Petitioner on March 15, 2022.

40) The period oftime between Petitioner's notification ofthe issuesbarring his "appearance" and the hearing terminating Petitioner's parental rightswas not
more than three days, which did not allow time for Petitioner to resolve, or attempt to resolve, the issue prior to the Court's ruling on the matter, thus denying Petitioner
access to the hearing. 41) Pursuant to the above, Petitionerwas denied access to the court in any meaningfulway.
GROUND TWO • Violation of Statute ofLimitations
42) MCA §§ 41-3-423(5) and 41-3-445(1)(a)(i)(A) establish a 30 day "statute of limitations" for the CFSD to file for the termination ofparental rights following a finding that reunification efforts are not required pursuant to MCA§41-3-423. 43) In instant case, a determination that reunification efforts were not required, pursuant to MCA § 41-3-423, was found and entered in September 3, 2019. 44) Petitioner was not served, or otherwise notified, ofanyproceedingsfiled
or brought against him related to instant matter prior to the motion(s) served on February 16, 2022, more than two years after the determination that reunification efforts were not required, pursuant to MCA § 41-3-423, was found and entered in September 3, 2019. 45) The CFSD's motion Petitioner was served with wasinitiated by a motion filed by the CFSD on November 24, 2021, more than two years after the determination that reunification effortswere not required, pursuant to MCA §41-3-423, was found and entered in September 3, 2019. 46) There were no additional filings, fmdings, or orders regarding reunification efforts with Petitioner in Cause No DN-19-06 between September 3, 2019 and November 24, 2021 which would serve to extend the statutory time period for CFSD to file for termination ofPetitioner's parental rights. 47) Petitioner had no cause, accordingly, to be prepared, in anyway, for CFSD's motion, submitted and filed more than two years after the lapse ofthe 30 day statutoryperiod, and everyreason to believe the matter to have been resolved, as a matter oflaw, leaving his parental rights in tact.

5 of8GROUND THREE Denial ofAccess to Counsel 48) Petitioner was served notice ofthe CFSD's motion seeking to terminate his parental rights on February 16, 2022. 49) Petitioner is, due to facilityrestrictions, at this time, only able to communicate with counsel via mail (see Facts 7 and 8). 50) State ofMontana enteredjudgment terminating Petitioner's parental rights pursuant to hearing on and effective March 18, 2022, which is 30 days after Petitioner was served notice ofthe action against him. 51) Petitioner received only one communication from his attorney, a letter dated March 10, 2022, receivedby Petitioner on March 15, 2022, during the time betweenbeing served and the effective dated ofthe Court'sjudgment. 52) Under the circumstances, the pace set by the Court denied Petitioner meaningful access to counsel in instant case.
GROUND FOUR Petitioner's Counsel was Ineffective
53) Petitioner's counsel maintained no communication with Petitioner between October 1, 2019 and March 10, 2022. 54) Petitioner's counselwas observably aware ofCFSD's motion to terminate Petitioner's parental rights not less than 2 %months prior to Petitioner being served (based on filing dates available from documents served to Petitioner on February 16, 2022) and took no action to contact Petitioner prior to March 10, 2022. 55) Petitioner contacted counsel twice, dated February 16, 2022 and February 28, 2022, after being served on February 16, 2022, before counsel responded with the March 10, 2022 letter. 56) Petitioner's counsel's March 10, 2022 letter came after Petitioner, in his February 28, 2022 letter, threatened a complaint with the BarAssociation. 57) At no time, in anycommunication, did Petitioner's counsel aid, in any significant way, to the preparation ofa defense. 58) Petitioner's counsel failed to notifyPetitioner that the CFSD had ruled on the termination ofhis parental rights, Petitioner was notified ofthat by the Court, by mail, received April 4, 2022. 6 of859) Petitioner's counsel failed to represent Petitioner's interest by ensuring

the facilitation ofPetitioner's appearance byvideo or phone at anyhearingbefore the Court in Montana, including the September 3, 2019 hearing and the March 18, 2022 hearing. 60) Petitioner's counsel failed to communicate with Petitioner in a meaningful
was regarding the preparation of any defense in preparation for anyhearingin instant case, including the September 3, 2019 hearing and the March 18, 2022 hearing. 61) Petitioner's counsel failed to pursue the necessary time, given the total circumstances, to properly consult with Petitioner in the preparation of any defense against the termination ofPetitioner's parental rights, and/or at any stage ofthe proceedingsleading up to the termination ofPetitioner's parental rights, to include the September 3, 2019 proceedings.
GROUND FIVE

Petitioner's Hawai'i Convictionis UnderAppeal 62) Petitioner's conviction in the state ofHawai'i for multiple counts ofsexual assault and promoting child abuse is the primarybasis for the CFSD's action against Petitioner. 63) Petitioner's conviction in Hawai'iis currently under appeal. 64) Petitioner's Hawai'i appeal includes matterswhich, on remand, could result in a finding ofnot guilty on the related offenses. 65) Afinding ofnot guiltyin Petitioner's Hawai'i case would invalidate the CFSD's primary grounds against Petitioner for the termination ofhis parental rights, the sexual assault issue and the length ofprison termissue.

RELEIF
Petitioner, in accordance with the above factors, and for cause shown therein, requests that this Honorable Court set aside the March 18, 2022judgment, entered March 25, 2022, terminating Petitioner's parental rights.

I declare, under the penalty ofperjury, that the above stated facts are true and accurate to the best ofmyknowledge, and request reliefas described accordingly.

7of8DATED: October 25, 2022, Eloy, Arizona

Dafiny Friddle Petitioner Pro Se

8 of8

# ru

_ cD FILED NOV 07 2022 Bowen Greenwood CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT
A: 4 MONTANA SUPREME COURT

IN THE MAFFIER OF: Cause No DN-19-06 EZRI FRIDDLE, AYOUTH IN NEED OF CARE. STATE OF MONTANA Bowen Grevenwooa Clerk of Supreme Couri State of tvlontar,-; Cause No. MOTION FOR DISMISSAL OF COUNSEL

COMES NOW Danny Friddle, Petitioner Pro Se, to petition this Honorable Court to remove Michelle J. Maltese, appointed counsel assigned to Petitioner by the State of Montana, as Petitioner's counsel in Cause No. DN-19-06, for the cause ofineffective counsel. FACTS 1) Between not beforeJune 6, 2019 and not afterAugust 19, 2019, Petitioner was served by the Pinal County Sheriffs Department in Arizona providing notice ofcommencement ofaction against him in instant case as part of the case filed
on May 23, 2019 by the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, Child and Family Services Division ("CFSD"). 2) Petitioner was notified in an August, 13, 2019 letter from attorney MichelleJ. Maltese ("Ms. Maltese) that Ms. Maltese had been appointed to represent Petitioner in instant case. 3) For the entire duration ofher appointment as Petitioner's counsel, from August 2019 through March 2022, Petitioner received a total offour communications from Ms. Maltese, one letter dated August 13, 2019, received on or about August 19, 2019, one letter dated August 27, 2019, received on or about September 3, 2019, one letter dated September 27, 2019, received on or about October 1, 2019, and one letter dated March 10, 2022, received on March 15, 2022 (dates according to original letters and Petitioner's facility mail log). 4) Between August 2019 and March 2022, Petitioner contacted his counsel, Ms. Maltese, eight times, one letter sent leaving Petitioner's facility on or about August 21, 2019, one letter sent leaving Petitioner's facility on or about September 23, 2019,
one letter sent leaving Petitioner's facility on or about October 9, 2019, one letter sent leaving Petitioner's facility on or about December 13, 2019, one letter sent leaving
1 of4 11/07/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0631Petitioner's facility on or aboutJuly 17, 2021, one letter dated February 16, 2022,

which left Petitioner's facility on February 22, 2022, one letter dated February 28, 2022, which left Petitioner's facility on March 2, 2022, and one letter dated March 25, 2022, which left Petitioner's facility on March 18, 2022 (dates according to copies of original letters and Petitioner's facility mail log). 5) Following the letter received by Petitioner on or about October 1, 2019, Petitioner received no response from his letters to Ms. Maltese until he threatened a complaint to the Montana State BarAssociation in his letter sent on or about March 2, 2022. 6) Petitioner is housed at a prison facilitywhich utilizes a restricted phone/calling list. 7) Due to administrative complications, Petitioner was/has been unable to add counsel, Ms. Maltese, to his facilityphone list, and as such is unable to call Ms. Maltese directly. 8) At no time did Petitioner receive anyincoming "legal calls" from counsel, Ms. Maltese. 9) On or about Septenther 3, 2019, the Court found that reunification efforts did not need to be made with regards to Petitioner in instant case. 10) Petitionerwas notified ofthe September 3, 2019 decision in instant case by means ofMs. Maltese'sletter dated September 27, 2019, received on or about October 1, 2019. 11) Per documents served on Petitioner, motion to terminate Petitioner's parental rightswas filed by CFSD on or about Noventher 24, 2021. 12) Petitioner's counsel, Ms. Maltese, according to the Certificate of Service contained within the CFSD's motion for termination ofPetitioner's parental rights, was electronically served by e-mail. 13) Petitioner was served with the documents seeking the termination ofhis parentalrights on or about February 16, 2022 bythe Pinal County Sheriff's Department. 14) OnJune 22, 2021, Petitioner filed initial appellate proceedings relating to his conviction for which he is currentlyincarcerated for. 15) In Ms. Maltese's March 10, 2022 letter, Ms. Maltese stated that she was having difficulties scheduling "appearances" for court with Saguaro Correctional Center. 16) The period oftime between Petitioner's notification ofthe issues barring
2 of4his "appearance" and the hearing terminating Petitioner's parental rightswas not

more than three days. 17) Petitioner's counsel maintained no communication with Petitioner between October 1, 2019 and March 10, 2022. 18) Petitioner's counsel was observably aware ofCFSD's motion to terminate Petitioner's parental rights not less than 2 1 / 2 months prior to Petitioner being served (based on filing dates available from documents served to Petitioner on February 16, 2022) and tookno action to contact Petitioner prior to March 10, 2022. 19) Petitioner contacted counsel twice, dated February 16, 2022 and February 28, 2022, before counsel responded with the March 10, 2022 letter. 20) Petitioner's counsel's March 10, 2022 letter came after Petitioner, in his February 28, 2022 letter, threatened a complaint with the BarAssociation. 21) At no time, in any communication, did Petitioner's counsel aid, in any significant way, to the preparation ofa defense. 22) Petitioner's counsel failed to notify Petitioner that the CFSD had ruled on the termination ofhis parental rights, Petitioner was notified ofthat bythe Court, by mail, received April 4, 2022. 23) As ofthe date ofthis filing Petitioner has had no further contact from appointed counsel MichelleJ. Maltese since her March 10, 2022 letter, received on March 15, 2022. 24) Petitioner's counsel failed to represent Petitioner's interest by ensuring the facilitation of Petitioner's appearance byvideo or phone at any hearingbefore the Court in Montana, including the September 3, 2019 hearing and the March 18, 2022 hearing. 25) Petitioner's counsel failed to communicate with Petitioner in a meaningful
was regarding the preparation of any defense in preparation for anyhearing in instant case, including the September 3, 2019 hearing and the March 18, 2022 hearing. 26) Petitioner's counsel failed to pursue the necessary time, given the total circumstances, to properly consult with Petitioner in the preparation ofany defense against the termination of Petitioner's parental rights, and/or at any stage ofthe proceedings leading up to the termination ofPetitioner's parental rights, to include the September 3, 2019 proceedings. RELIEF Petitioner, in accordance with the above, requests that this Honorable Court grant Petitioner reliefin the form of the removal of appointed counsel for the cause of 3 of4counsel being ineffective.

I declare, under the penalty ofperjury, that the above stated facts are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and request reliefas described accordingly. DATED: October 25, 2022, Eloy, Arizona

D nny Friddle Petitioner Pro Se

4 of 4

# FILED

NOV O7 2022 Bovven Greenwooa CLA
-k of Supreme Court State of Montana MONTANA SUPREME COURT

IN THE MATTTER OF: Cause No DN-19-06 EZRI FRIDDLE, A YOUTH IN NEED OF CARE. Cause No. Bowen Greenwood CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF MONTANA

MOTION FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION

COMES NOW Danny Friddle, Petitioner Pro Se, to petition this Honorable Court for special consideration in the filing of the matters filed here with. This request is made pursuant to the following declaration: DECLARATION OF PETITIONER 1) I am Danny Friddle, Petitioner in the included filings. 2) I have no access to the applicable court rules for the State of Montana. 3) Having no access to the relevant court rules nor the assistance of counsel, I have prepared the attached filings as best as able in accordance with similar known procedures. 4) I have submitted the related filings in this matter Pro Se due to appointed counsel, MichelleJ. Maltese, being ineffective, as demonstrated in the included filings. 5) The involved parties in Cause No. DN-19-06, are primarily being shown being served by e-mail, and without a given physical address. 6) I have no access to e-mail that would allow for electronic service. RELIEF Pursuant to the above factors, Petitioner requests the following: 1) Pending appointment of new counsel, permission to provide service by certified mail to MichelleJ. Maltese, Petitioner's current appointed counsel for Cause No. DN-19-06, and to the Powell County Attorney Kathrine McErney. 2) That the State of Montana provide electronic service to all other relevant parties as necessary, or, in the alternative, to allow for delay of service to any additional parties until the appointment of new counsel in accordance with the motion filed accordingly herewith. 3) That special consideration be given to any technical and/or procedural
errors contained within any filings filed in concert with this motion pending appointment ofnew counsel in this matter, and that leave be granted to amend such
1 of 2 11/07/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0631errors accordingly.

I declare, under the penalty ofperjury, that the above stated facts are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and request relief as described accordingly. DATED: October 25, 2022, Eloy, Arizona

anny Friddle Petitioner Pro Se

2 of 2

# FILED FILED KathrynMcEnery POWELL COUNTYATTORNEY 409MissouriAvenue, Ste.301 DeerLodge,Montana 59722 (406) 846-9790 AttorneyforDepartment Bowen Greenwood 

## MAR 3 2:24)=ORNExiAcOURT

• iger dp 

### ro„„ ...E4

R‘wir

MONTANA THIRD JUDICIALDISTRICT COURT,POWELL COUNTY
INTHEMATTEROF: EZRIFRIDDLE, AYOUTHINNEED OF CARE. CauseNo.DN 19-06 NOTICE OFENTRY OFJUDGMENT

COMES NOW, Kathryn McEnery, Powell County Attorney, on behalf of the Department ofPublic Health and Human Services and pursuant to Rule 77, M.R.C.P., hereby gives notice ofthe March25, 2022 Order Terminating Parental Rights ofDanny FranklinFriddle,signedbytheHonorableRayJ.Dayton,DistrictCourtJudge. Thisorder terminates the parental rights ofDanny Franklin Friddle to the subject child, effective
March 18,2022. Atrueandcorrect copyofthisOrderisherebyattached anddulyserved
uponyou. Datedthis 30th dayofMarch,2022. MatiPzept ncEeteitid KathrynMcEnery,electronicallysigned PowellCountyAttorney

NOTICE OFENTRYOF JUDGMENT Page 1of2 11/07/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0631

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Iherebycertifythaton this 30th day ofMarch, 2022, I caused to be delivered a true and accuratecopyoftheforegoingNoticeofEntryofJudgment,tothefollowing,bythenotedmeans: Taryn Gray,Esq. Attorneyfor Child

MorganN. Smith,Esq. AttorneyforMother OfficeofthePublicDefender-Anaconda Electronicallymailed: Taryn®dhlawgroupmt.com Kate@dhlawgroupmt.com shannonQdhlawgroupmt.com Electronicallymailed: MorganSmith®mt.gov MaryBrown®mt.gov MichelleJ.Maltese Electronicallymailed: AttorneyforFather michellejrnaltese®gmail.com AmyPearson-CPS DPHHS

CaI Boyle Guardianadlitem AnacondaFamilyResourceCenter POBox 1179 AnacondaMT59711 SarahLehner 1036Missouri Ave. DeerLodge,MT59722 DannyFranklinFriddle AO#A6008921 Saguaro Correctional Center 1250EastAricaRd. Eloy,AZ 85131 Electronicallymailed: Amy.Pearson®mt.gov HHSCFSMSLLEGAL®mt.gov Electronicallymailed: donas@anacondafrc.org

Mailed:USPS,Postage,pre-paid

Mailed:USPS,Postage,pre-paid

li f eed a Orta r Electronicallysignedby: SarahE.Ward LegalAssistant

NOTICEOFENTRY OFJUDGMENT Page2of2