alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 ... T h i s pr oce edi n g a r i s es ou t of Cau s e N o. 2009- CR
- 10755, s t y l ed St at e of Tex as v . J

os e M ede r os , i n the 3 9 9 th Jud i ci al D i st ri ct C o urt , B exar C o unt y , T exas, t he H o no rable Juani t a V asquez - G ardne r presi d i ng.

2 ... O n D ece mb er 31, 200 9, t he t r i al cour t appo i nt ed V i r gi ni a M aur er t o re pres ent r el at or i n t he cr i mi nal p ro c e e d ing
. i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -1 0- 00 00 5- CR IN RE J ose M ED ER OS Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Deliver ed and F iled: March 3, 2010 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED On J anuar y 5, 2010, rela tor J ose Mede ros filed a petition for writ of manda mus, complaining of the tr ia l c ourt ’s fa ilure to r ule on his pro se motion for a spee dy trial. Howeve r, counse l has bee n appointed to re prese nt relator in the c riminal proce eding pending in the trial court f

or which he is curre ntly

confine d. 2 A c ri min a l de fe nd a nt i s n ot e nti tle d to hy br id repr esenta tion. Se e Ro bin so n v . S tat e , 24 0 S .W. 3d

91 9, 92 2 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 20 07 ); Patrick v. Sta te , 906 S.W .2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). A trial cour t has no leg al duty

to rule on a pr o
se motion fi l ed with reg ard to a criminal proc eedingin which the def endant is re prese nted by04
- 10
- 00 00 5- CR

- 2- counsel. See Robinson , 240 S.W .3d at 922. Consequently , the t rial court did not abuse its discre tion by de c lin ingto r

ule on re la tor ’s pr o s e motion filed i n the criminal proce eding pending in the trial
c o u rt. A c c o r d in g ly , r e lato r ’ s p e ti ti o n f o r w r it o f ma

n d a mu s is d e n ie d . T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(a)
.
PER C URI AM DO NO T PU B L I SH
#### City of New York, Respondent, v TransportAzumah LLC, Appellant.

Submitted February 4, 2013;

decided March 28, 2013

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the October 2011 Supreme Court order, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Motion GRANTED and Order filed September 9, 2016. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00677-CV

____________

IN RE TEXAS WINDSTORM INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

122nd District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-CV-2013

ORDER

On August 30, 2016, relator Texas Windstorm Insurance Association filed a 

petition for writ of mandamus in this court. Relator asks this court to order the 

Honorable Lonnie Cox, Judge of the 122nd District Court, in Galveston County, 

Texas, to set aside his (1) August 25, 2016 order granting real party in interest’s 

motion to compel production, or alternatively, motion to exclude the expert 
testimony of Paul Strickland; and (2) August 25, 2016 order denying relator’s 

emergency motion to withdraw Exhibit 3-A, entered in trial court number 12-CV2013, styled City of Dickinson v. Texas Windstorm Insurance Association. 

Relator also has filed a motion for temporary stay of the proceedings below.

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. On August 30, 2016, relator asked this court to 

stay proceedings in the trial court pending this court’s decision on the petition for 

writ of mandamus.

It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relator’s request 

for relief requires further consideration and that relator will be prejudiced unless 

immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relator’s motion for 

temporary stay and issue the following order:

We ORDER the August 25, 2016 order granting the motion to compel 

production and the commencement of trial in trial court cause number 12-CV-2013, 

City of Dickinson v. Texas Windstorm Insurance Association, STAYED until a final 

decision by this court on relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, or until further 

order of this court.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Busby and Brown.
EXHIBIT 32
  CERTIFICATION
OF OFFICERS
 OF
RED LAKE EXPLORATION, INC.
 PURSUANT
TO 18 USC § 1350
  Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the
undersigned officers of Red Lake Exploration, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby
certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
  The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2008 of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  Information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:  June
13, 2008
 By:
                /s/
      Caitlin JeffsCaitlin
      Jeffs, President


By:
              /s/
      John Da CostaJohn
      Da Costa, Chief Financial Officer
@misc{1214036,
  author = {Ramaswamy Chandramouli and Zack Butcher},
  title = {A Zero Trust Architecture Model for Access Control in Cloud-Native Applications in Multi-Location Environments},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-09-13 04:09:00},
  publisher = {Special Publication (NIST SP), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=956524},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-207A},
  language = {en},
}
----

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Robert C.J. van Mourik                         |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert C.J. van Mourik                                                                                                                                                          |
| Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                         |
| Principal Financial and Accounting Officer                                                                                                                                      |
|                                                                                                                                                                            |   |

----
#### American F. L. M. Co. *v.*Benson *et al.*

*(Circuit Court, D. Nebraska.*

1887.)

Writs—Service by Publication—Act of 1875—Act of March 3,1887.

By the act of March 3,1887, the right given by the eighth section of the act of March 3, 1875, to bring in non-residents by publication in certain cases is expressly continued.

Motion to Dismiss, and suppress service by publication.

In December, 1886, this bill was filed for the foreclosure of a mortgage, in which the mortgagor and subsequent incumbrancers were impleaded as defendants. Subpoena was issued, and return served upon the subsequent incumbrancers, but not upon the mortgagor. In March, 1887, after the passage of the act of March 3d of that year, the usual affidavit was filed, showing a proper case for an order for the publication of notice of the suit to the mortgagor. The publication-was accordingly made, and the proof thereof filed in the court. Thereupon the mortgagor filed his motion to set aside the order for publication. The parties plaintiff and the parties defendant were citizens of different states. In support of the motion to discharge the order for publication, it was insisted that under the act of March 3, 1887, a non-resident defendant could not be brought into court by publication.

*L.*Q. *G. Dosh,*for complainant.

*J. M. Woolworlh,*for defendants.

Brewer, J.

The motion to dismiss this cause for want of jurisdiction, and suppress the service by publication, is overruled. The right to proceed against a non-residont defendant in certain cases is given by section 8 of the act of 1875. The act of 1887, § 5, expressly provides that nothing in this act shall repeal or affect any jurisdiction or right ■mentioned in said section 8; hence the same right exists now as before said act of 1887 to bring in non-residents by publication in cases mentioned in said section 8 of the act of 1875. That right is all that is attempted to be enforced in this case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
  <ARTICLE>  BD  <LEGEND>  This  schedule   contains   summary   financial
information  extracted from the financial  statements for the year ended May 31,
1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                           year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                May-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                   Jun-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                     May-31-1999
<CASH>                                                               411,629
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    117,505,910
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                                        0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                                      0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                               46,466,749
<PP&E>                                                            14,837,114
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   217,290,808
<SHORT-TERM>                                                      15,000,000
<PAYABLES>                                                        48,572,430
<REPOS-SOLD>                                                               0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                                        0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                                11,723,172
<LONG-TERM>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                             143,432
<OTHER-SE>                                                       141,851,774
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     217,290,808
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                                145,819,935
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                                              10,022,013
<COMMISSIONS>                                                     45,250,436
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                                              0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                                      4,308,393
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   390,334
<COMPENSATION>                                                    80,055,124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   34,680,680
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                                        21,005,459
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      21,005,459
<EPS-BASIC>                                                             1.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           1.49



</TABLE>
@article{1206261,
  author = {Joshua Ziegler and Florian Luthi and Mick Ramsey and Felix Borjans and Guoji Zheng and Justyna Zwolak},
  title = {Automated extraction of capacitive coupling for quantum dot systems},
  year = {2023},
  number = {19},
  month = {2023-05-24 04:05:00},
  publisher = {Physical Review Applied},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936203},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.054077},
  language = {en},
}
@misc{1210761,
  author = {Omar Aboul-Enein and Ya-Shian Li-Baboud and Roger Bostelman and Ann Virts},
  title = {Design and Implementation of a Closed-Loop Mobile Manipulator Control System},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-07-28 04:07:00},
  publisher = {Technical Note (NIST TN), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936827},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.2258},
  language = {en},
}
@article{1206281,
  author = {Maxime Malnou and John Mates and Michael Vissers and Leila R. Vale and Dan Schmidt and Douglas Bennett and Jiansong Gao and Joel Ullom},
  title = {Improved microwave SQUID multiplexer readout using a kinetic-inductance traveling-wave parametric amplifier},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-05-25 04:05:00},
  publisher = {Applied Physics Letters},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936356},
  language = {en},
}
#### Leon R. Koziol, Individually and as Parent of Child A and Another, Appellant, v State of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Decided September 10, 2013

Appeal, insofar as taken from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Supreme Court’s order as dismissed the complaint, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved; appeal, insofar as taken from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Supreme Court’s order as denied appellant’s motion for reconsideration of a prior order denying appellant’s application for a preliminary injunction, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000833526
<NAME>                              GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP II-D

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                   642,292
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            867,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,509,991
<PP&E>                                15,516,766
<DEPRECIATION>                        13,389,328
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         4,053,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    168,864
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                             3,738,034
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           4,053,241
<SALES>                                2,573,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       2,874,526
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          1,184,566
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        1,689,960
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    1,689,960
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                           1,689,960
<EPS-BASIC>                                 4.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, ascreated by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the followingcertifications are being made to accompany the Registrant’s quarterly report onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 27, 2007:**

 

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer(1)**

 

----

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Neiman Marcus, Inc. (theCompany) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter endedOctober 27, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

(ii) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: December 4, 2007 |   | /s/    BURTON M. TANSKY             |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   |                                                    |
|                    |   | Burton M. Tansky  President and Chief Executive Officer |

** **

** **

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer(1)**

 

----

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Neiman Marcus, Inc. (theCompany) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter endedOctober 27, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

(ii) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: December 4, 2007 |   | /s/    JAMES E. SKINNER                         |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   |                                                                |
|                    |   | James E. Skinner  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----

(1)A signed original for this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Neiman Marcus, Inc. and will be retained by Neiman Marcus,Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
@article{1213131,
  author = {Fan Zhang and Russell Maier and Igor Levin and Andrew J. Allen and Jun-Sang Park and Peter Kenesei and Ivan Kuzmenko and Jan Ilavsky and Pete Jemian},
  title = {In situ Probing of Interfacial Roughness and Transient Phases During Ceramic Cold Sintering Process},
  year = {2023},
  number = {259},
  month = {2023-10-15 04:10:00},
  publisher = {ACTA Materialia},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936773},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119283},
  language = {en},
}
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2
Form 10-KSB
Cardiff International, Inc.
File No. 000-49709


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
Cardiff International, Inc.(the "Company") Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") for the purpose of complying with
Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
"Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code.

      I, Gary R. Teel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cardiff
International, Inc.


Dated: April 18, 2007                           By: /s/ Gary R. Teel
                                                Chief Financial Officer
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 605 

Expressing support for the goals and ideals of ‘‘National Hydrocephalus 

Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. DOGGETT) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the goals and ideals of ‘‘National 

Hydrocephalus Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas hydrocephalus, an abnormal accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid in the brain, is a life-threatening condition 

that affects approximately 1,000,000 Americans of all 

ages; 

Whereas each year, one in 770 babies develops hydrocephalus; 

Whereas hospitalization charges for pediatric hydrocephalus 

cases alone cost the United States health care system 

$2,000,000,000 per year; 

Whereas adults living with hydrocephalus add exponentially 

to health care system costs, as well as costs related to reduced productivity in the workplace; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 605 IH 

Whereas the incidence of undiagnosed and untreated hydrocephalus in older Americans can result in unnecessary 

confinement to assisted living facilities and nursing 

homes; 

Whereas up to two-thirds (24,000 potential cases) of our current and former military service members suffering from 

moderate to severe traumatic brain injuries are at risk of 

developing hydrocephalus; 

Whereas there is no cure for this condition, and the only 

treatment is costly brain surgery which frequently must 

be repeated to replace the shunt, a medical device that 

is the most common treatment for the condition and has 

one of the highest failure rates of all medical devices; 

Whereas various research studies are being conducted in the 

United States in order to better understand, prevent, and 

treat hydrocephalus; 

Whereas organizations, such as the Pediatric Hydrocephalus 

Foundation and the Hydrocephalus Association, serve as 

global leaders for hydrocephalus awareness, education, 

support, advocacy, and research funding; 

Whereas the Pediatric Hydrocephalus Foundation established 

‘‘National Hydrocephalus Awareness Month’’ in 2009; 

and 

Whereas the Pediatric Hydrocephalus Foundation and the 

Hydrocephalus Association recognize September as ‘‘National Hydrocephalus Awareness Month’’: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘National 

3 Hydrocephalus Awareness Month’’; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 605 IH 

1 (2) continues to support research to prevent, 

2 detect, and treat hydrocephalus. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS