alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15213]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,903]


Mountain Skylines, Inc, Leavenworth, WA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on May 8, 2009 in response to a worker 
petition filed on behalf of workers of Mountain Skylines, Inc, 
Leavenworth, Washington.
    The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of May 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-15213 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000811000
<NAME> 87B
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         221,422
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  116,033
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               337,455
<PP&E>                                      13,370,742
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,723,851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,984,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,253
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,963,093
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,984,346
<SALES>                                        965,599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               994,415
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,326,204
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (331,789)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (331,789)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (331,789)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (16.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
N O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### NO. CAAP-20-0000024

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO CITIBANK, N.A. AS TRUSTEE TO LEHMAN XS TRUST M ORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-10, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF WAIKOLOA HILLS CONDOMINIUM, Defendant-Appellant, and MARSHALL D. CHINEN, ESQ., AS THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ARCHIE K. GRANT AKA ARCHIE GRANT, JR., DECEASED; M ICHIKO GRANT, Defendants-Appellees, and JOHN DOES 1-20; JANE D OES 1-20; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-20;DOE ENTITIES 1-20; AND DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-20, Defendants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 17-1-106K)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL ( By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Chan and Wadsworth, JJ.) Upon consideration of Defendant-Appellant Association of Apartment Owners of Waikoloa Hills Condominium's May 14, 2020 Motion to Dismiss Appeal CAAP-20-0000024, the papers in support, and the record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, under Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, May 21, 2020.
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge
/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan Associate Judge /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-20-0000024 21-MAY-2020 09:17 AM
EXHIBIT 32.2
------------



                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                     OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landauer, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jonathon M. Singer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

i.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

ii.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



August 6, 2009

                                    /s/ Jonathon M. Singer
                                    ------------------------------
                                    Jonathon M. Singer
                                    Chief Financial Officer
@article{1211786,
  author = {Grace Sommers and David Huse and Michael Gullans},
  title = {Crystalline Quantum Circuits},
  year = {2023},
  number = {4},
  month = {2023-07-31 04:07:00},
  publisher = {PRX Quantum},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=935726},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.030313},
  language = {en},
}
@misc{1214196,
  author = {Gabriel Taylor and Anthony D. Putorti Jr. and Scott Bareham and Christopher U. Brown and Wai Cheong Tam and Ryan Falkenstein-Smith and Stephen Fink and Michael Heck and Edward Hnetkovsky and Nicholas Melly and Kenneth Hamburger and Kenneth Miller},
  title = {Report on High Energy Arcing Fault Experiments: Experimental Results from Medium-Voltage Bus Duct and Switchgear Enclosures},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-09-15 04:09:00},
  publisher = {Technical Note (NIST TN), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=956503},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.2263},
  language = {en},
}
EXHIBIT 10.25.1



                  Schedule of Omitted documents in the Form of
                   Exhibit 10.25, Including Material Detail in
                 Which Such Documents Differ From Exhibit 10.25

                   ------------------------------------------


Stock Option Agreement, dated September 7, 2001, between the Registrant and
Harold Paul.



                  The form of the document listed above does not differ in
material detail from the form of Exhibit 10.25, except with respect to the
identity of the option holder.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C
SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Tel Group, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2008, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), I, George Alvarez, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C Section 1350), that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







By: /s/ George
      AlvarezGeorge
      Alvarez
              Chief
      Executive OfficerNovember 14,
      2008




[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Tel Group, Inc. and will be retained by China Tel Group, Inc. and
furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.]
T.S., A CHILD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2074

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 1, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Levy County.

James T. Browning, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Archie F. Gardner, Jr., Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### GUERIN v. PORTLAND TRAWLING CO.

No. 209.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

April 24, 1939.

*65Monto Rosenthal, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Thomas H. Walsh, of Boston, Mass., for defendant.

McLELLAN, District Judge.

 Pursuant to the defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars, the plaintiff is directed to file a bill of particulars stating the approximate time of day of the alleged injury to the plaintiff; where he was on the vessel at the time of his alleged injury; what he was then doing, the part of the vessel or the vessel’s equipment causing the plaintiff’s alleged injury; and whether he was alone or working with other members of the crew. The plaintiff is also directed to include in his bill of particulars the respects in which the defendant, its servants or agents, were negligent. Such a bill of particulars to be filed in or within thirty (30) days.
#### In re SULLIVAN.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Aug. 1, 1940.

Newman & Bisco, of New York City (Nathan Waxman, of New York City, of counsel), for Conlew, Inc., creditor-appellant.

Robert H. Spelman, of New York City, for bankrupt.

CLANCY, District Judge.

This motion must be denied. Under Rule 75(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the District Court has the power to settle the record on appeal only when a difference arises between the parties with respect to what occurred in the District Court, so that, the record may conform to the truth. Plere the entire file was before me and was considered on the motion, the decision of which this creditor seeks to appeal. I, therefore, lack the power to exclude from the record any of the papers which bankrupt thinks should properly be in it. See Westmoreland Asbestos Co., Inc., v. Johns-Manville Corporation, D. C.S.D.N.Y., 1 F.R.D. 249. If such papers are in fact unnecessary, Rule 75(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure contemplates remedial action by the Circuit Court of Appeals.

Submit order.
IV 

★

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 604 

Condemning and censuring Adam Schiff, Representative of California’s 28th 

Congressional District. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 

Mr. BIGGS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ethics 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning and censuring Adam Schiff, Representative of 

California’s 28th Congressional District. 

Whereas, President Trump released the transcript of a call 

between him and the President of Ukraine; 

Whereas, President Trump subsequently released the whistleblower complaint of August 12, 2019; 

Whereas, in a September 26, 2019, hearing on the whistleblower complaint, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff purported to relay the content of the 

phone call to the American people; 

Whereas, instead of quoting directly from the available transcript, Chairman Schiff manufactured a false retelling of 

the conversation between President Trump and President 

Zelensky; 


jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HRES 604 IH1S 

Whereas, this egregiously false and fabricated retelling had 

no relationship to the call itself; 

Whereas, these actions of Chairman Schiff misled the American people, bring disrepute upon the House of Representatives, and make a mockery of the impeachment 

process, one of this chamber’s most solemn constitutional 

duties; 

Whereas, for more than two years, Chairman Schiff has 

spread false accusations that the Trump Campaign 

colluded with Russia; 

Whereas, on March 20, 2017, then-Ranking Member Schiff 

read out false allegations from the Steele dossier accusing 

numerous Trump associates of colluding with Russia; 

Whereas, then-Ranking Member Schiff falsely claimed in a 

March 2017 interview to have ‘‘more than circumstantial 

evidence’’ of collusion with Russia; 

Whereas, then-Ranking Member Schiff negotiated with Russian comedians who he believed to be Ukrainian officials 

to obtain materials to damage the President of the 

United States politically; 

Whereas, members of the Intelligence Committee have lost 

faith in his objectivity and capabilities as Chairman, with 

every Republican member on the Committee having 

signed a letter calling for his immediate resignation as 

Chairman; and 

Whereas, Chairman Schiff has hindered the ability of the Intelligence Committee to fulfill its oversight responsibilities 

of the Intelligence Community, an indispensable pillar of 

our national security: Now therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 


jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

HRES 604 IH1S 

1 (1) the House of Representatives censures and 

2 condemns Representative Adam Schiff for conduct 

3 that misleads the American people in a way that is 

4 not befitting an elected Member of the House of 

5 Representatives; 

6 (2) Representative Adam Schiff will forthwith 

7 present himself in the well of the House for the pro8 nouncement of censure; and 

9 (3) Representative Adam Schiff will be cen10 sured with the public reading of this resolution by 

11 the Speaker. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marsha Sibblies, Appellant.

Submitted June 10, 2013;

decided June 25, 2013

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Steven Banks, Esq., The Legal Aid Society, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.

Judge Abdus-Salaam taking no part.
EX-10.51



 Exhibit 10.51 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
(“Amendment”) is dated August 1, 2013 by and between Coronado Biosciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Karin Hehenberger, MD, PhD (the “Executive”). Unless the context
otherwise requires, capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Employment Agreement (as defined below) and in this Amendment. 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to an Employment Agreement dated April 19, 2012 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement. 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows. 
 1. Amendment
One. Subsection 1.1 is hereby deleted and replaced with the following: 
 “Executive’s position shall be
Executive Vice President of Scientific Affairs.” 
 2. Ratification. Each of the Company and Executive agree
that this Amendment and the change of title and duties do not constitute Good Reason under the Employment Agreement. 
 3.
Effect of Amendment. Except as expressly amended herein, the terms of the Employment Agreement are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set out and shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their terms.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the date and
year first above written. 
  

			
	COMPANY:
	
	CORONADO BIOSCIENCES, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Harlan F. Weisman, M.D.

	Name:	 	 Harlan F. Weisman, M.D.

	Title:	 	 Chairman and CEO

	
	EXECUTIVE:
	
	 /s/ Karin Hehenberger, M.D., PH.D.

	KARIN HEHENBERGER, M.D., PH.D.
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the quarterly report of ES Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Office of
the Comptroller of the Currency on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony P.
Costa, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
    Date: October 28, 2008
              /s/ Anthony P
      Costa
                Anthony
      P. Costa
                  Chairman
      and Chief Executive
Officer
#### J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. et al., Appellants, v Vigilant Insurance Company et al., Respondents.

Submitted March 18, 2013;

decided March 21, 2013

Motion by American Insurance Association for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and nine copies filed within seven days.

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002,18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned hereby certifies that he
is the duly appointed and acting Chief Executive Officer of Navidea Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) and hereby further certifies
as follows:



(1)         The
periodic report containing financial statements to which this certificate is an exhibit fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)         The
information contained in the periodic report to which this certificate is an exhibit fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



In witness whereof, the undersigned has
executed and delivered this certificate as of the date set forth opposite his signature below.



|March 18, 2013 | /s/ Mark J. Pykett                   
|-------------- | -------------------------------------
|               | Mark J. Pykett, V.M.D., Ph.D.        
|               | President and Chief Executive Officer
January 6, 2015 

 

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk 

Third Court of Appeals

P O Box 12547

Austin, TX 78711-2547

RE: Case Number 03-14-00803-CV, Melvin Valentine v. Texas Department of 

Public Safety (Trial Court case number: C-1-CV-14-010145, Travis County) 

Dear Mr. Kyle, 

The following is my correct contact information in this case: 

VALERINA WALTERS

Attorney for the Department of Public Safety

Office of Regulatory Counsel

P O Box 4087, MSC-0246 

Austin, Texas 78773-0246

Phone: (512) 424-2736

Fax: (512) 424-7725

Email: valerina.walters@dps.texas.gov 

Kindly update accordingly. If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank 

you for your prompt attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

 /s/ Valerina Walters

Valerina Walters

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

OFFICE OF REGULATORY COUNSEL

BOX 4087, MSC-0246, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78773-0246 

Office: (512) 424-5842 Fax: (512) 424-7725

www.dps.texas.gov 

COMMISSION

A. CYNTHIA LEON, CHAIR

MANNY FLORES

FAITH JOHNSON

STEVEN P. MACH

RANDY WATSON 

STEVEN C. McCRAW

DIRECTOR

DAVID G. BAKER

ROBERT J. BODISCH, SR. 

DEPUTY DIRECTORS

ACCEPTED

03-14-00803-CV

3659589

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

1/6/2015 9:37:37 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/6/2015 9:37:37 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was 

served on the 6th day of January, 2015 in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 9.5 to 

the following:

Melvin C. Valentine, Jr.

12233 Runningbird Ln, #A

Austin, TX 78758

justiceintraviscounty@yahoo.com

/s/ Valerina Walters

VALERINA WALTERS

COURTESY • SERVICE • PROTECTION
NO. 07

- 11

- 0 139

- CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO
PANEL C NOVEMBER 9, 2012

HARVEY BRAMLETT JR. and JASON BLAKENEY , Appellants v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTIC E INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, et al. , Appell ees

_____________________________ FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY; NO. 99,017

- 00

- E ; HONORABLE DOUGLAS WOODBURN , PRESIDING
Memorandum Opinion

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Harvey Bramlett Jr. and Jason Blakeney, indig ent inmates, appeal from the trial court‟s dismissal of their lawsuit against the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and specified individual employees of the Department (collectively ref erred to as “the Department”). Though they allege various issues, we need only address one. It
per tains to the trial court‟s execution of the dismissal order several months after the two inmates moved to recuse the trial judge. We reverse and remand.2

On November 10, 2010, the district clerk of Potter County received “ Plaintiff s[„] Verified Motion for R ecusal

. ” They alleged therein that the trial judge was subject to
recusal because he was a defendant in a separate lawsuit they initiated against him

. Nothing of record indicates that the trial judge either denied the m otion or forwarded it to the regional presiding judge for dispos i tion. Nor does anyone contend that such was
done. Instead, and in appa rent response to the Department‟s motion to dismiss, the trial judge executed a “Final Judgment” dismissing the cause o n March 14, 2011. Once a party files a motion to recuse, the trial court has the obligation to either

rec use himself or request the presiding judge of the administrative judicial district to assign a judge to hear the matter. T EX

. R. C IV

. P

. 18a(c). 1 An d, “[e]xcept for good cause stated in the order in which further action is taken, the judge shall make no further orders and shall take no further action in the case after filing of the motion and prior to a hearing on the motion.” Id. 18a(d). More impor tantly, o rder s issued in contravention of Rule 18a(d) are void. In re Stearman , 252 S.W.3d 113, 117 (Tex. App.

– Waco 2008, orig. proceeding ); In re A.R. , 236 S.W.3d 460, 477 (Tex. App.

– Dallas 2007, no pet. ). Because the trial court did not co mply with Ru le 18a(c) once the motion to recuse was filed or 18a(d) when issuing its order dismissing the suit ( i.e. provide good cause for proceeding) , the dismissal order was and is void. Accordingly, we reverse the “Final Judgment” and remand the cause.

Br ian Quinn Chief Justice

1 Because the motion was filed and the dismissal executed before the 2011 changes to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 18a became effective , we apply the provisions of Rule 18a in existence before the 2011 changes. But, the res ult would be the same irrespective of which rules were applied.