alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 205 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 205

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Small Business 
                 in the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2019

Ms. Velazquez submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Small Business 
                 in the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Small Business (hereafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $6,738,000 for the One Hundred 
Sixteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $3,369,000 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2019, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2020; and
            (2) not more than $3,369,000 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2020, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2021.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
31.1





CERTIFICATIONS – principal
executive and financial officers





I, Bill
H. Gunn, Chief Executive Officer of AmerAlia, Inc., certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of AmerAlia, Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;





5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date:
June 5, 2008








/s/ Bill H. GunnBill
      H. Gunn, Chief Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of
Financial Condition and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                  163,135
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              0 
<TRADING-ASSETS>                              0  
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>             724,968
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        0  
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          0
<LOANS>                               3,145,164 
<ALLOWANCE>                              71,012
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        4,160,115  
<DEPOSITS>                            1,943,643  
<SHORT-TERM>                          1,891,670  
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                      52,011
<LONG-TERM>                              50,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0  
<PREFERRED>                                   0  
<COMMON>                                    115
<OTHER-SE>                              222,672
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>        4,160,115
<INTEREST-LOAN>                         286,487
<INTEREST-INVEST>                        12,733
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                        299,220
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                       92,678
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      204,226        
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                    94,994
<LOAN-LOSSES>                            20,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                          44,151
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          40,561
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>               40,561
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0  
<NET-INCOME>                             23,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              2.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                              2.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                             2.28     
<LOANS-NON>                               8,260
<LOANS-PAST>                                  0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                          8,090
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                           9,335
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                         67,250
<CHARGE-OFFS>                            19,483
<RECOVERIES>                              6,979
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                        71,012
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                     71,012
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                           0  
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                       0  
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 18-0719

__________________________________________________________________

IN RE THE PARENTING OF C.J.E. and 

S.M.E.,

TEGAN RAE KELLER,

Petitioner/Appellant,

and

NOAH FREDERICK EGLESTON, 

Respondent/Appellee.

ORDER DISMISSING 

APPEAL

This matter came before the Court on Appellant Tegan Rae Keller’s Motion 

to Voluntarily Dismiss Appeal, filed pursuant to M.R.App. P. 16(4). Having 

considered the same, and for good cause shown, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed.

DATED and electronically signed as indicated below. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 7 2022

02/07/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0437
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16
- 7648

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JACKIE LEE RATTLER , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Bryson City

. Martin K. Reidinger , District Judge. ( 2:13

- cr - 00012

- MR

- DLH

- 1; 1:16

- cv - 00126

- MR )

Submitted : April 2 5 , 2017 Decided: April 27, 2017

Before MOTZ , DUNCAN , and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Jackie Lee Rattler, Appellant Pro Se. John Daren Pritchard, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jackie Lee Rattler seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B ) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by dem onstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have i ndependently reviewed the record and conclude that Rattler has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because th e facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John G. Glynn, Appellant.

Submitted September 10, 2012;

decided September 13, 2012

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Paul *V.*Mullin, Esq., care of Sugarman Law Firm, LLfj 211 West Jefferson St., Syracuse, New York 13202 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
#### Tiffany Griffin, Respondent, v Christina Pennoyer, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 765]

Plaintiffs prediscovery motion for partial summary judgment was not, under the circumstances, premature since defendant failed to demonstrate that facts essential to justify opposition to the motion may exist but could not be stated *(see*CPLR 3212 [f]).

In support of her motion, plaintiff submitted evidence in admissible form, including her affidavit and a police report containing admissions by defendant, demonstrating that defendant made an abrupt left-hand turn into the path of plaintiff s vehicle, which was passing through an intersection with a green light in its favor and the right-of-way, and that plaintiff was free *342from any negligence. This evidence, which demonstrated that defendant violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1141, was sufficient to establish plaintiffs entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of which driver was responsible for the accident *(see Berner v Koegel,*31 AD3d 591 [2006]).

In opposition, defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Defendant’s averment that she had a green light in her favor when she attempted to make the left-hand turn did not undercut plaintiffs assertion that she had a green light. Thus, regardless of the color of the light in defendant’s direction, plaintiff had the right-of-way *(see*Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1141). Moreover, defendant’s conclusory assertion that “[b]efore making the turn I checked to make sure that the way was clear” is insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Berner, supra*[defendant’s testimony that she never saw plaintiffs vehicle before collision in intersection occurred was insufficient to raise triable issue of fact regarding defendant’s negligence or plaintiffs comparative fault since a driver has a duty to see that which, through the proper use of senses, should have been seen]).

There is no basis, on this record, for finding that bifurcation of the fault and serious injury (Insurance Law § 5102 [d]) issues was improper or in any way prejudicial to defendant *(see Shinn v Catanzaro,*1 AD3d 195, 199 [2003]; *Reid v Brown,*308 AD2d 331 [2003]). Concur—Lippman, P.J., Andrias, Williams and McGuire, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000833526    
<NAME>                              GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PSHIP II-D
                                     
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                   275,762
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            311,274
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         587,036
<PP&E>                                16,996,927
<DEPRECIATION>                        14,365,087
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         3,833,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    216,693
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                             3,410,175
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           3,833,083
<SALES>                                  505,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         508,499
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            493,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           14,999
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       14,999
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              14,999
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        
 

</TABLE>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
FirstFed Financial Corp.


      We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration  statements
(No.  333-33463,  033-63207)  on Form S-8 of FirstFed  Financial  Corp. of our
report dated  January 28, 2000,  relating to the  consolidated  statements  of
financial  condition of FirstFed  Financial Corp. as of December 31, 1999, and
1998, and the related consolidated  statements of operations and comprehensive
earnings,  stockholders'  equity  and cash  flows for each of the years in the
three-year  period  ended  December  31,  1999,  which  report  appears in the
December 31, 1999, annual report on Form 10-K of FirstFed Financial Corp.


                                            KPMG LLP


Los Angeles, California
March 13, 2000
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                         388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                          New York, New York 10013-2396

June 11, 2001


John W. Henry & Company, Inc.
301 Yamato Road, Suite 2200
Boca Raton, Fl. 33431-4931

Attn: Mr. Ken Webster

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Mr. Webster:

     We are writing with respect to your  management  agreements  concerning the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the "Management  Agreements").
We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2002 and
all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

o        Hutton Investors Futures Fund, L.P. II  (HIFF II)
o        Shearson Lehman Select Advisors Futures Fund L.P.
o        Shearson Mid-West Futures Fund
o        Smith Barney Mid-West Futures Fund L.P. II
o        JWH Strategic Allocation Master FD LLC
o        The Saugatuck Fund L.P.

     Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel  McAuliffe at the address
above or fax to  212-723-8985.  If you have any  questions  I can be  reached at
212-723-5435.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC

By:       /S/  Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         ----------------------------------
         Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         Chief Financial Officer & Director

AGREED AND ACCEPTED

JOHN W. HENRY & COMPANY, INC.

By:        /S/ Ken Webster
         -----------------------------------

Print Name:    Ken Webster
             -------------------------------
                Chief Financial Officer

DRMcA/sr
#### John J. Napolitano, Appellant, v New York State Grievance Committee et al., Respondents.

[822 NYS2d 712]

In a claim to recover damages related to a disciplinary proceeding instituted by the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, the claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Scuccimarra, J.), dated May 6, 2005, which, inter alia, granted the motion of the defendant State of New York to dismiss the claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent State of New York.

The Court of Claims properly found that the claim was time-barred, as any alleged wrong occurred at the date of the claimant’s suspension in May 2001 *(see*Court of Claims Act *980§ 10 [3]; CPLR 214), and further that the claimant failed to adequately describe the nature of his claim (see Court of Claims Act § 11 [b]).

The claimant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P, Schmidt, Krausman and Lifson, JJ., concur. *[See 8*Misc 3d 1007(A), 2005 NY Slip Op 50982(U) (2005).]
**Exhibit 31(a)**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, J. TimothyBryan, certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis amended quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q/Aof ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)                designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)               evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)                all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)               anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: September 7, 2006 | /s/ J. TIMOTHY  BRYAN     |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|
|                    | J. Timothy Bryan          |
|                    | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----