alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2338 

_____________________________

FRONTLINE INSURANCE 

UNLIMITED COMPANY a/s/o

SMOKY HILL CAPITAL GROUP 

LLC,

Appellant,

v.

QUIK RYDE, INC., a Florida 

corporation d/b/a QUIK RYDE 

LLC and JAMES D. COCHRAN, an 

individual,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County.

David W. Green, Judge.

July 31, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WINOKUR, and LONG, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Michael Bernard Stevens and Mary Grecz of Derrevere Stevens 

Black & Cozad, West Palm Beach, for Appellant.

Kimberly Kanoff Berman of Marshall Dennehey, P.C., Fort 

Lauderdale; William Estes and James Patrick Hanratty of 

Marshall Dennehey, P.C., Jacksonville; Mark Kraus McCulloch of 

Marshall Dennehey, P.C., Orlando, for Appellees.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 96-40885 Summary Calendar

_____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,

versus MARIO ALBERTO PEDRAZA, Defendant,
ED D. RAZO; BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-96-CR-29-4

_________________________________________________________________ January 13, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Ed D. Razo and Bankers Insurance Company, surety for criminal defendant Mario Alberto Pedraza, appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for new trial and for reconsideration of the court’s order granting a judgment of default on bond. The surety-2-

alleges that it did not receive notice of the hearing of the judgment of default as required by Rule 46(e)(3).
The surety was not entitled to notice of any proceedings other than the judgment of default on bond. U nited States v. Garcia , 724 F.2d 514, 516 (5th Cir. 1984). The surety admitted receiving a copy of the motion for judgment of default on bond. The district court considered the arguments the surety would have presented at the hearing when ruling on the surety ’s postjudgment motion, and the court informed the surety that, if the surety secured Pedraza’s immediate appearan ce, it would consider remission of bond. The surety has cited no substantive defense it had to the judgment of default.
DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
D I S M I S S E D.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. 1350**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the undersigned officers of Red Metal Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(a)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2019, (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and 

(b)   Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 14, 2019

/s/ Caitlin Jeffs

Caitlin Jeffs, Chief Executive Officer and President

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Joao (John) da Costa

Joao (John) da Costa, Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. OA08-62-000] 

                    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives notice that on January 16, 2009 members of its staff will participate in a teleconference to be conducted by the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) regarding the CAISO's 2009 transmission plan. Further information and documents for the teleconference can be obtained at:                     *http://www.caiso.com*.                 

Sponsored by the CAISO, this teleconference is open to all market participants, and Commission staff's participation is part of the Commission's ongoing outreach efforts. This meeting may discuss matters at issue in the above captioned docket. 

                    For further information, contact Saeed Farrokhpay at                     *saeed.farrokhpay@ferc.gov*; (916) 294-0233 or Maury Kruth at                     *maury.kruth@ferc.gov*, (916) 294-0275.                 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-1473 Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 627 

Expressing support for the designation of the second Monday in October 

as ‘‘Indigenous Peoples’ Day’’ to celebrate and honor indigenous peoples 

and their shared history and culture. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 11, 2019 

Mrs. TORRES of California (for herself, Ms. HAALAND, Mr. YOUNG, Ms. DAVIDS of Kansas, and Ms. MCCOLLUM) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of the second Monday 

in October as ‘‘Indigenous Peoples’ Day’’ to celebrate 

and honor indigenous peoples and their shared history 

and culture. 

Whereas ‘‘Indigenous Peoples’ Day’’ was first proposed in 

1977, by a delegation of Native Nations to the United 

Nations International Conference on Discrimination 

against Indigenous Populations in the Americas; 

Whereas currently over 50 municipalities and 10 States celebrate ‘‘Indigenous Peoples’ Day’’ on the second Monday 

of October; 

Whereas Columbus Day is a Federal holiday, established by 

order of President Roosevelt in 1937, and is officially recVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:04 Oct 11, 2019 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR627.IH HR627

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 627 IH 

ognized by some cities and States around the country on 

the second Monday of October; 

Whereas Columbus Day does not currently provide an opportunity to reflect on the colonization of North America by 

Europeans; 

Whereas prior to colonization, indigenous peoples lived and 

flourished in the Americas for thousands of years; 

Whereas the European colonization of North America led to 

the suppression, forced assimilation, and genocide of indigenous peoples and their cultures; 

Whereas the House of Representatives recognizes and values 

the vast contributions made to the United States by indigenous peoples’ knowledge, science, philosophy, arts, 

and culture; 

Whereas it is the responsibility of the House of Representatives to foster inclusivity, racial equity, and justice for all 

people and oppose systemic practices that perpetuate oppression; 

Whereas the House of Representatives recognizes its responsibility to honor the Nation’s indigenous roots, history, 

traditions, and cultural contributions; and 

Whereas the second Monday in October would be an appropriate date to designate as ‘‘Indigenous Peoples’ Day’’: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors and recognizes the unique contribu3 tions indigenous peoples have made to the United 

4 States of America; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 627 IH 

1 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to observe ‘‘Indigenous Peoples’ Day’’ with appro3 priate ceremonies and activities that celebrate and 

4 promote awareness of indigenous peoples and their 

5 shared history and culture; and 

6 (3) supports the official designation of ‘‘Indige7 nous Peoples Day’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
@article{1214741,
  author = {Eric Norrgard and Catherine Cooksey and Stephen Eckel and Nickolas Pilgram and Kayla Rodriguez and Howard W. Yoon and Yuly Andrea Chamorro Mena and Lukas Pasteka and Anastasia Borschevsky},
  title = {Radiative Decay Rate and Branching Fractions of MgF},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-09-08 04:09:00},
  publisher = {Physical Review A},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936468},
  language = {en},
}
----

|   | (1) | the                  quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gulf Western Petroleum Corporation                  for                  the period ended February 28, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies                  with the                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                  Act of                  1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  Gulf                  Western Petroleum Corporation. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /                  s                  / Wm Milton Cox |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                  |
|   | Wm                  Milton Cox                        |
|   | Chairman                  and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (principal                  executive officer)        |

----
EXHIBIT 10.61
 
 TERMINATION OF CONSULTING AGREEMENT
 
 This Termination of Consulting Agreement (this “Termination Agreement”) is executed as of this 21st day of March, 2011 by Toveloa Pty Limited ABN 67 003 629 212, a company registered under the Corporations Act in Australia (“Toveloa”) and  Natural Soda Holdings, Inc., a corporation formed under Colorado law (“NSHI”) to be effective as of the close of business December 31, 2010 (the “Effective Date”).
  WHEREAS, Toveloa and NSHI entered into a Consulting Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) whereby Toveloa would provide consulting services to NSHI based on the needs and requirements of NSHI from time to time;
 
 WHEREAS, the parties have discussed terminating the obligations and rights of the parties under the Consulting Agreement, effective as of the Effective Date;
 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
 
 1. Termination of Consulting Agreement.  That as of the Effective Date, the Consulting Agreement is terminated and NSHI shall not be entitled to receive any consulting services from and after the Effective Date. Toveloa shall not be entitled to receive any compensation for any services performed for NSHI after the Effective Date unless the parties enter into an agreement with respect to any such services.
 
 2. Governing Law.  This Termination of Consulting Agreement shall be governed by the local laws of Colorado, without giving effect to the conflict of laws principles thereof which would result in application of the local laws of any other jurisdiction.
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this Termination of Consulting Agreement to be effective as of the Effective Date.
 
 TOVELOA PTY LIMITED

ABN 67 003 629 212By:
/s/ Alan You LeeName:
Alan You LeeTitle:
DirectorNATURAL SODA HOLDINGS, INC.By:
/s/ Bill H GunnName:
Bill H GunnTitle:
Chairman
 
 1
Order entered July 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00184-CR

VICTOR RENARD BROWN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-76504-M

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### Orison *v.*The Syracuse.1

*(District Court, E. D. New York.*

May 12, 1888.)

Collision—Vessel at Anchor in Protur Place.

A low-boat is liable for the damage resulting from a collision between the boats of her tow and a vessel at anchor in a proper place.

In Admiralty. Libel for damages.

On the night of October 16, 1886, the schooner Juliette Terry was lying at anchor in the North river, nearly opposite the foot of Thirty-Fourth street. The tow-boat Syracuse, with a tow of canal-boats and barges astern of her on a hawser, passed up outside of the schooner without touching her, but the tow came in collision with the schooner, carrying away her head-gear, and causing her to lose an anchor and chain. For sucli damage this suit was brought. The Syracuse claimed that the schooner was anchored in an improper place, and did not pay out her anchor chain, when hailed to do so, and that the tow was carried upon her by the force of the wind.

*Carpenter*<fc Mosher, for libelant.

*Owen &*Gray, for the Syracuse.

Benedict, J,

This is an action to recover damages occasioned to the schooner Juliette Terry by being run into by the tow-boat Syracuse, in the North river. The schooner was at the time at anchor at a place where she had a right to be. The evidence fails to show fault on her part. The fault was of the Syracuse in omitting to avoid her. The libelant must have a decree for his damages and costs.
Opinion issued July 14, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00122-CV

———————————

VICTORIA BATTLE, Appellant

V.

STEVEN BERT ALEXANDER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 247th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2013-73376

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Victoria Battle, has neither established indigence for purposes of 

appellate costs or paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the 

clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1, 37.3(b). After being notified that this 
2

appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending 

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Huddle, and Lloyd.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

VICTOR GOMEZ,

APPELLANT,

V.

JEANETTE ABRAHAM, HARRY 

ABRAHAM, AND JAMES 

ABRAHAM

APPELLEES.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00171-CV

Appeal from the

210th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2013-DCV0648)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of prosecution, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore 

dismiss the appeal. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
Exhibit 32

                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Marshall T. Reynolds, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Jack M. Reynolds,
President and Chief Financial Officer of Energy Services Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") each certify in their capacity as officers of the Company that they
have reviewed the Quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended December 31, 2007 and that to the best of their knowledge:

1.   the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



February 14, 2008                          /s/ Marshall T. Reynolds
---------------                            -----------------------------------
Date                                       Marshall T. Reynolds
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


February 14, 2008                          /s/ Jack M.  Reynolds
---------------                            -------------------------------------
Date                                       Jack M. Reynolds
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer
cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge 

Cathy Valenta Weise, Settlement Judge 

Day R. Williams, Attorney at Law 

Kenneth Dale Sisco 

Belding, Harris & Petroni 

Robison Belaustegui Sharp & Low 

Hartman & Hartman 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
**Exhibit 10.24**

 

**MEMORANDUM TO JEFF NACHBOR**

 

May 2, 2005 

 

Dear Jeff: 

 

You have represented to us that the fair market value of your residence at                                    is$                . You also have informed us that in order to sell it in the relative near term, you anticipate the need to sell the property for less than$                . The management team is willing to provide you with additional relocation assistance in the form of a payment to you of $100,000 (plus gross-upfor your income taxes at an assumed rate of approximately 50%). This payment to you (the “Supplemental Payment”) would be in addition to any other benefits or compensation set forth in your letter agreement of February 14, 2005. Thisbenefit is payable to you within 15 days of your signing this memorandum and returning it to Human Resources or Tracy Wan. 

 

Should you leave the Company’s employ within one year of your start date for any reason other than termination by the Company without Cause or yourdeath or disability, the full amount of Supplemental Payment shall be repaid to the Company within 30 days of your termination. 

 

If this is agreeable, please sign and date this memo in the space below and return it to Human Resources or Tracy Wan.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 29, 2016

a0126 

# Order

Clerk January 29, 2016

151943

RONALD W. LECH II,

Plaintiff/Counter

- Defendant

- Appellee,

v SC: 151943

COA: 320028

Livingston CC: 08

- 024045

- CH

HUNTMORE ESTATES

CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,

Defendant/Counter

- Plaintiff,

and

JACOBSON ORE CREEK LAND

DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., and SCOTT R.

JACOBSON, d/b/a S.R. JACOBSON

LAND DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.,

Defendants

- A ppellants.

______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 16, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE Section IV of the Court of Appeals

judgment, and w e REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration. On

remand, the Court of Appeals shall consider whether its decision that the defendants are

not entitled to post

- judgment interest under MCL 600.6013 on their sanctions award is

consistent wi th Ayar v Foodland Distributors , 472 Mich 713, 717 (2005). In all other

respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining

question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT
35.1.2





1123
– Servicer Compliance Statement


2007
SEC Listed Transactions


Fidelity
Platform











I, Herb
Gover, Executive Vice President North American Consumer Asset Operations,
certify that:








(a) A
review of CitiMortgage, Inc. (the “Servicer”) activities during the 12 month
period ending December 31, 2007 (“Reporting Period”) and of its performance
under the applicable servicing agreement as identified on Schedule A has been
made under my supervision.





(b) To
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all
of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.











February
22, 2008





By:/s/ Herb Gover


Name:  Herb
Gover


Title:   Executive
Vice President, North American Consumer Asset Operations















Schedule ASEC
      Listed Transactions-FidelitySecurity
            Investor Code
            Primary
      Servicer
            Master
      Servicer
            Trust
      AdministratorCMSI
      2007-5
            9280-9287
            XCMALT
      2007-A6
            9288-9293
            XCMSI
      2007-6
            9294-9300
            XCMALT
      2007-A7
            9301-9308
            XCMSI
      2007-7
            9311-9318
            XCMALT
      2007-A8
            9326-9329
            XSEMT
      2007-2
            60273
            XMLMBS
      2007-1
            60366
            XCSMC
      2007-1
            60368
            XCSMC
      2007-2
            60369
            XSequoia
      2007-1
            60370
            XSEMT
      2007-2
            60371
            XMLMBS
      2007-1
            60055
            XRWMT
      2007-1
            60273
            X