alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2  CERTIFICATIONS  I, Eldon D. Dietterick, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 of Blue Ridge Real Estate Company and Big Boulder Corporation (together , the Registrants);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants boards of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date: January 29, 2007  /s/ Eldon D. Dietterick Eldon D. Dietterick Executive Vice President and Treasurer
An unpublisHed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

HIGH SIERRA RANCH HOME No. 68420
OWNERS ASSOCIATION, A NEVADA
NON-PROFIT BENEFIT

CORPORATION,
A
ve. ppellant, F | L E Dp
MICHAEL'S PLUMBING, HEATING &

AIR, INC., D/B/A ONE HOUR HEATING JUL 17 201

& AIR CONDITIONING, A NEVADA Ke AINDEMAR

CORPORATION, Ce Ai ala
Respondent. DEPUTY CLERF

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Appellant has filed a notice of withdrawal of appeal. The
notice is treated as a motion for voluntary dismissal. NRAP 42(b). Cause
appearing, the motion is granted and this matter is dismissed.

It is so ORDERED.

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT
TRACIE K. LINDEMAN

By: Mau yt Adu.

cc: Hon. Lynne K. Simons, District Judge
Angius & Terry LLP/Las Vegas
Laxalt & Nomura, Ltd./Reno
Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME CouRT
oF
Nevapa

CLERK'S ORDER

—— 16 ~ AILS
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 11, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50963 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTONIO JAUREGUI-ESPARZA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-02-CR-665-1-WWJ

-------------------- Before DUHÉ, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1
Antonio Jauregui-Esparza (“Jauregui”) appeals from his conviction by guilty plea of possession with intent to distribute marijuana. Jauregui retained his right to appeal from the denial
of his motion to suppress evidence, and he contends that Border
Patrol agents lacked reasonable suspicion to stop his pickup after it was observed on Ranch Road 2523 near Del Rio, Texas.
The Border Patrol agents in Jauregui’s case had reasonable suspicion to stop the pickup. Jauregui was traveling in an area2

close to the border, on a road frequently used to avoid a Border
Patrol checkpoint. Agent Rene Carrasco was familiar with RR 2523, having patrolled the road for eight years. Jauregui’s vehicle was

v ery clean, which in Agent Carrasco’s experience was unusual for the area. Jauregui did not respond to Agent Carrasco’s wave, and
he accelerated and drove away very fast after his initial encounter with Agent Carrasco. Jauregui did not stop until agents activated
their lights. By the time Jauregui was stopped, agents could have reasonably s uspected that Jauregui was involved in criminal activity. S ee United States v. Inocencio , 40 F.3d 716, 722 (5th Cir. 1994). The district court did not err by denying the motion to suppress.
AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 123 (Monday, June 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 31054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15290]



[[Page 31054]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,690]


Tube Fabrication Industries, Inc., Logansport, IN; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 27, 2009 in response to a petition 
filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Tube Fabrication 
Industries, Inc., Logansport, Indiana. The workers at the subject 
facility produce steel tube components.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 18th day of May 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-15290 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Michael Aziz Zarif Shabazz, Also Known as Michael Hurley, Appellant, v Jerome J. Richards, Acting Judge of Franklin County Court, et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 11, 2013;

decided March 26, 2013

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see 20*NY3d 983 (2012)].

Judge Rivera taking no part.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3594

_____________________________ S HUKEL M UTCH , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County

. Andrew J. Decker , Judge

. May 15, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W ETHERELL , R AY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, fo r Appellee.
----

|                                                  |   | As      of March 31, 2010 |       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|------------|
|                                                  |   | Proved                    |       |   |   |   |
|                                                  |   | Developed                 |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                  |   | Producing                 |       |   | Non-Producing |   |   | Undeveloped |   |   | Total      Proved |   |
|                                                  |   |                      |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net      Remaining Reserves                           |   |                      |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|           Oil/Condensate - Bbls   |   |                      | 727,000    |   |   |   | ― |   |   |   | 91,000 |   |   |   | 818,000 |   |
|           Plant Products - Bbls   |   |                      | ―    |   |   |   | ― |   |   |   | ― |   |   |   | ― |   |
|           Gas - MCF               |   |                      | 912,000    |   |   |   | ― |   |   |   | ― |   |   |   | 912,000 |   |
|                                                  |   |                      |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Income      Data                                      |   |                      |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|           Future Gross Revenue    |   | $                         | 43,024,000 |   |   | $ | ― |   |   | $ | 4,832,000 |   |   | $ | 47,856,000 |   |
|           Deductions              |   |                      | 20,613,000 |   |   |   | ― |   |   |   | 2,819,000 |   |   |   | 23,432,000 |   |
|           Future Net Income (FNI) |   |                      | 22,411,000 |   |   |   | ― |   |   |   | 2,013,000 |   |   |   | 24,424,000 |   |
|                                                  |   |                      |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|           Discounted FNI @ 10%    |   | $                         | 12,844,000 |   |   | $ | ― |   |   | $ | 318,000 |   |   | $ | 13,163,000 |   |

----

|               |   |   |  Discounted      Future Net Income |      |
|--------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|-----------|
|               |   |   |  As      of March 31, 2010         |      |
| Discount      Rate |   |   | Total                                   |      |
| Percent            |   |   | Proved                                  |      |
|               |   |   |                                    |      |
| 20                 |   |   | $                                       | 8,975,843 |   |
| 30                 |   |   | $                                       | 6,836,229 |   |
| 40                 |   |   | $                                       | 5,538,886 |   |
| 50                 |   |   | $                                       | 4,666,451 |   |

----

----

----

----

----

----
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 100th District Court of Carson County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on April 28,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Whitney Nicole Carter v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-13-00207-CR Trial Court Number: 5052

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated April 27, 2015, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be reversed and this cause is remanded

to the trial court.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on July 15, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          34,852
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       254
<OTHER-SE>                                     (34,852)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (6,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-11425

Conference Calendar

 

JOSEPH REED,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT, Executive Director,

Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:97-CV-132

- - - - - - - - - -

June 17, 1998

Before DAVIS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Joseph Reed, Texas inmate # 634538, appeals the district

court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint as frivolous. 

Reed, who is assigned to an administrative segregation unit,

challenges the constitutionality of restrictions on his diet,

exercise, and right to keep personal property in his cell. 

Having reviewed the record and Reed’s appellate brief, we AFFIRM

for essentially the reasons adopted by the district court. Reed
No. 97-11425

-2-

v. Scott, No. 7-97-CV-0132-X (N.D. Tex. Sept. 19, 1997, and

October 16, 1997).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Eugene Malobrodsky, the Chief Executive Officer of INTELLIGENT
BUYING. INC.  (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.
The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010
(the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 13th day of
May 2010.





/s/Eugene MalobrodskyEugene
      MalobrodskyPrincipal
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Intelligent Buying, Inc. and will be retained by Intelligent Buying, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
This court "review [s] a district court's decision to admit or 

exclude evidence for abuse of discretion." Chavez v. State, 125 Nev. 328, 

344, 213 P.3d 476, 487 (2009). Evidence is inadmissible hearsay if it is an 

out-of-court "statement offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter 

asserted." See NRS 51.035. 

"A statement of the declarant's then existing state of mind, 

emotion, sensation or physical condition, such as intent, plan, motive, 

design, mental feeling, pain and bodily health, is not inadmissible under 

the hearsay rule." NRS 51.105(1). The state-of-mind exception only 

applies if the declarant's then-existing state of mind is a relevant issue in 

the case. See Shults v. State, 96 Nev. 742, 751, 616 P.2d 388, 394 (1980). 

Here, what is relevant is Caren's state of mind at the moment 

that she committed the larceny. Robinson v. Goldfield Merger Mines Co., 

46 Nev. 291, 303, 213 P. 103, 105 (1923) ("To convict of larceny, it is 

necessary to find that the intent to steal existed at the time of the 

taking."). If, at that moment, she declared, "I intend to turn this purse in," 

such a statement would be admissible. But a later declaration of a prior 

mental state—a recollection of a state of mind—is not admissible under 

the then-existing state-of-mind exception to the hearsay rule. 

"Declarations of intention, casting light upon the future, have been 

sharply distinguished from declarations of memory, pointing backwards to 

the past. There would be an end, or nearly that, to the rule against 

hearsay if the distinction were ignored." Shepard v. United States, 290 

U.S. 96, 105-06 (1933) (Cardozo, J.). 

Because Caren's state of mind after the arrest is not relevant 

to whether she had the intent to steal the purse when she took it, the 

state-of-mind exception does not apply to this case. See Shults, 96 Nev. at 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(D) 1947A 4004. 
J. 

J. 

751, 616 P.2d at 394. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its 

discretion by excluding the out-of-court statement. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

Parraguirre 

cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge 

Carl E. G. Arnold 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1947R peyo
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited ("Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), J. Timothy Bryan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company (principal executive officer),
and Dennis Schmitt, Senior Vice PresidentFinance (principal financial and accounting officer), each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:



|/s/J. TIMOTHY BRYANJ. Timothy Bryan Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) |  | /s/DENNIS SCHMITTDennis Schmitt Senior Vice PresidentFinance
(principal financial and accounting officer)
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|November 13, 2007                                                                         |  | November 13, 2007                                                                                         

A
signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), has been provided to ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited and will be retained by ICO Global Communications
(Holdings) Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

ConstellationEnergy

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-3 and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-135991, 333-102723, 333-59601,33-57658, 333-56572, 333-24705, and 33-49801, and 33-59545, 333-45051, 333-46980,333-89046, 333-129802, 333-81292 and 33-56084, respectively) ofConstellation Energy Group, Inc. of our report dated February 26, 2007relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, whichappears in this Form 10-K.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Baltimore, MarylandFebruary 27, 2007

BaltimoreGas and Electric Company

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement on Form S-3 (No. 333-135991 and 333-102432) of BaltimoreGas and Electric Company of our report dated February 26, 2007 relating to thefinancial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in thisForm 10-K.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Baltimore, MarylandFebruary 27, 2007

----
---

EXHIBIT 13.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Lee, Chief Financial Officer of Quartz Mountain
Resources Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i)      the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the
fiscal year ended July 31, 2013 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(ii)      the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|Date:  | November 27, 2013      
|------ | -----------------------
|       |                        
|       | /s/ Michael Lee        
|By:    | Michael Lee            
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---