alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-09-018]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

 United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

 June 29, 2009 at 11 a.m.

# PLACE:

 Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS:

 Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agenda for future meetings: none.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Inv. No. TA-421-7 (Remedy) (Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from China)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its report containing its determination, proposed recommendations on remedy, and views of the Commissioners to the President and the United States Trade Representative by July 9, 2009.)

5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

Issued: June 22, 2009.

By order of the Commission.

William R. Bishop,

Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.

[FR Doc. E9-14968 Filed 6-22-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Q GLRE -2013.6.30 Exhibit 10.1






EXHIBIT 10.1


EXHIBIT A-1
Greenlight Reinsurance, Ltd. 
Amended Investment Guidelines with effect from July 24, 2013




		
	•
	Quality Investments:  At least 80% of the assets in the investment portfolio will be held in debt or equity securities (including swaps) of publicly-traded companies (or their subsidiaries) and governments of the Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development (the ''OECD”), high income countries, cash, cash equivalents and gold.  No more than 10% of the assets in the investment portfolio will be held in private equity securities.




		
	•
	Concentration of Investments:  Other than cash, cash equivalents, United States government obligations and gold, no single investment in the investment portfolio will constitute more than 20% of the portfolio.




		
	•
	Liquidity:  Assets will be invested in such fashion that Greenlight Re has a reasonable expectation that it can meet any of its liabilities as they become due. Greenlight Re will review with the investment advisor the liquidity of the portfolio on a periodic basis.




		
	•
	Monitoring:  Greenlight Re will require the investment advisor to re-evaluate each position in the investment portfolio and to monitor changes in intrinsic value and trading value and provide monthly reports on the investment portfolio to Greenlight Re or as Greenlight Re may reasonably determine.




		
	•
	Leverage:  The investment portfolio may not employ greater than 15% indebtedness for borrowed money, including net margin balances, for extended time periods.  The investment advisor may employ, in the normal course of business, up to 30% indebtedness for periods of less than 30 days.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15106]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Rehabilitation Research and Development Service Scientific Merit 
Review Board; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Rehabilitation 
Research and Development Service Scientific Merit Review Board will 
meet on August 25-26, 2009, at the Madison Hotel, 1177 15th Street, 
NW., Washington, DC, from 8 a.m. until 5:30 p.m. each day.
    The purpose of the Board is to review rehabilitation research and 
development applications for scientific and technical merit and to make 
recommendations to the Director, Rehabilitation Research and 
Development Service, regarding their funding.
    The August 25 session will be open to the public from 8 to 9 a.m. 
for the discussion of administrative matters, the general status of the 
program and the administrative details of the review process. The 
meetings will be closed as follows for the Board's review of research 
and development applications:

August 25: From 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
August 26: From 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    The reviews involve oral comments, discussion of site visits, staff 
and consultant critiques of proposed research protocols, and similar 
analytical documents that focus on the consideration of the personal 
qualifications, performance and competence of individual research 
investigators. Disclosure of such information would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Disclosure would also 
reveal research proposals and research underway which could lead to the 
loss of these projects to third parties and thereby frustrate future 
agency research efforts. As provided by subsection 10(d) of Public Law 
92-463, as amended, closing portions of the meeting is in accordance 
with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6), and (c)(9)(B).
    Those who plan to attend the open sessions should contact Ricardo 
Gonzalez, Administrative Officer, Rehabilitation Research and 
Development Service (122), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, at (202) 461-1750.

    Dated: June 22, 2009.

    By Direction of the Secretary:
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-15106 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6194

HAIBER V. MONTEHERMOSO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00291-RJC)

Submitted: March 29, 2012 Decided: April 3, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Haiber V. Montehermoso, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Haiber V. Montehermoso seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Montehermoso has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We also deny Montehermoso’s pending motion to 

appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 
3

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. (“BGH”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Forrest E. Wylie, Chief Executive Officer of MainLine Management LLC, the general partner ofBGH, hereby certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of BGH.
|                |   | MAINLINE MANAGEMENT LLC, as general partner of BGH |
|---------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
| Date: July 30, 2007 |   | /s/ FORREST E. WYLIE                               |
|                |   | Forrest  E.  Wylie                            |
|                |   | *Chief Executive Officer*                          |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED WITH THE COMPANY'S SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US $
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (61,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

133463 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 133463 COA: 275427 Bay CC: 04-010028-FC, JAMES MICHAEL KERN, 04-010727-FC, 04-010427-FC Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 20, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0618 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**









In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Equine Alliance Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Demitro
      Marianovich, Principle Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002, that:




(1)       
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)       
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




Registrant
              Date:
                August 4, 2008
            
            *Royal
                Equine Alliance Corporation*
              *By:
                /s/ Demitro Marianovich*Demitro
                MarianovichChief
                Executive Officer (Principle Executive Officer, Principle Financial
                Officer)
1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CR-10755, styled State of Texas v. Jose Mederos, in the 399th

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Juanita Vasquez-Gardner presiding.

2... On December 31, 2009, the trial court appointed Virginia Maurer to represent relator in the criminal

proceeding. 

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00005-CR

IN RE Jose MEDEROS

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 3, 2010

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On January 5, 2010, relator Jose Mederos filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining

of the trial court’s failure to rule on his pro se motion for a speedy trial. 

However, counsel has been appointed to represent relator in the criminal proceeding pending

in the trial court for which he is currently confined.2 A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid

representation. See Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v.

State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). A trial court has no legal duty to rule on a pro

se motion filed with regard to a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is represented by
04-10-00005-CR

-2-

counsel. See Robinson, 240 S.W.3d at 922. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its discretion

by declining to rule on relator’s pro se motion filed in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial

court. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 658 

Expressing support for the designation ‘‘Housing America Month’’ and honoring the importance of affordable housing and community development 

programs and resources that allow communities across the country to 

provide access to safe, secure housing for all Americans, regardless of 

income level. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 28, 2019 

Mr. CLAY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation ‘‘Housing America 

Month’’ and honoring the importance of affordable housing and community development programs and resources 

that allow communities across the country to provide 

access to safe, secure housing for all Americans, regardless of income level. 

Whereas for over 80 years it has been the policy of this Nation to promote the general welfare of the Nation by employing its funds and credit to assist States and localities 

to remedy housing conditions, and create and preserve 

housing that is decent, safe, and sanitary under the 

United States Housing Act of 1937; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 658 IH 

Whereas the House of Representatives, which has, over a period of many years, endeavored to address affordable 

housing and community development needs and has been 

successful in doing so through related appropriations and 

authorizing legislation has committed itself to meeting 

the affordable housing and community development needs 

of the country; and 

Whereas the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials has celebrated October as Housing America Month for over a decade and has honored the children 

living in subsidized housing through a calendar featuring 

their artwork: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of ‘‘Housing America Month’’ and honors 

3 the importance of our Nation’s housing and community 

4 development programs. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
97-442.

#### State ex rel. Brown v. Brogan.

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of John Doe, Appellant, v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, Respondent.

Submitted December 17, 2012;

decided February 12, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Judge Rivera taking no part.
ACCEPTED

12-14-00288-CV

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

7/17/2015 11:13:52 AM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 7/17/2015 11:13:52 AM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50391

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARCO ANTONIO ORTIZ-GOMEZ, also known as Antonio Gomez, also known

as Antonio Ortiz

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:06-CR-178-2

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Marco Antonio Ortiz-Gomez has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ortiz-Gomez has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 25, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-50391

2

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Exhibit 32




         Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

                                                                  March 31, 2005
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The  certification  set forth below is being  submitted in  connection  with the
annual report on Form 10-K of American Cable TV Investors 5, Ltd. (the "Report")
for the  purpose of  complying  with Rule  13a-14(b)  or Rule  15d-14(b)  of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Brian L.  Roberts,  the  Principal  Executive  Officer,  Lawrence S. Smith,  the
Co-Chief Financial Officer and John R. Alchin, the Co-Chief Financial Officer of
American  Cable TV Investors 5, Ltd.,  each  certifies  that, to the best of his
knowledge:

          1.   the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

          2.   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of American Cable TV Investors 5, Ltd.


                                         /s/ BRIAN L. ROBERTS
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name: Brian L. Roberts
                                         Principal Executive Officer

                                         /s/ LAWRENCE S. SMITH
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name: Lawrence S. Smith
                                         Co-Chief Financial Officer

                                         /s/ JOHN R. ALCHIN
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name: John R. Alchin
                                         Co-Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Gregory J. Gilbert, Appellant, v Cindy G. Lafave, Respondent.

Submitted September 10, 2012;

decided October 30, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that appellant is not a party aggrieved *(see*CPLR 5511). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
TDCJ Offender Details Page 1 of2 

New Offender Search 

Offender Information Details 

Return to Search list 

SID Number: 

TDCJ Number: 

Name: 

Race: 

Gender: 

DOB: 

Maximum Sentence Date: 

Current Facility: 

Projected Release Date: 

Parole Eligibility Date: 

Offender Visitation Eligible: 

02525097 

01934662 

CHILDERS,ROBERT ALAN 

w 

M 

1959-12-03 

2024-09-14 

MONTFORD 

2017-10-24 

2014-02-03 

YES 

Information provided is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times per day 

on visitation days. Because this information is subject to change, family members and 

friends are encouraged to call the unit prior to traveling for a visit. 

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE: 

? 

Scheduled Release Date: Offender is not scheduled for release at this time. 

Scheduled Release Type: Will be determined when release date is scheduled. 

Scheduled Release Location: 

... 

Parole Review Information 

Offense History: 

Offense 

Date 

I 

Offense 

Will be determined when release date is scheduled. 

Sentence C t C N Sentence (YY- Date oun Y ase o. MM-DD) 

I I I I 

http:// offender. tdcj. texas. gov /OffenderSearch/ offenderDetail.action ?sid=025 25 097 7/21/2015