alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 671 

Urging the United Arab Emirates to immediately end any activities enabling 

money laundering in violation of United States sanctions against Iran. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 31, 2019 

Mr. CLEAVER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Urging the United Arab Emirates to immediately end any 

activities enabling money laundering in violation of 

United States sanctions against Iran. 

Whereas the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has undertaken 

efforts to coordinate with United States partners to 

counter money laundering and terrorist financing and has 

participated in regional bodies to counter money laundering such as the Middle East and North Africa Financial Action Task Force; 

Whereas recent efforts by the UAE to restrain illicit money 

transfers remain insufficient in addressing concerns 

about the evasion of United States sanctions and money 

laundering; 

Whereas the Department of State has highlighted the need 

for the UAE to ‘‘continue increasing the resources deVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:50 Oct 31, 2019 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR671.IH HR671

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 671 IH 

voted to investigating, prosecuting and disrupting money 

laundering’’, according to the Department’s ‘‘Narcotics 

Control Strategy Report’’; 

Whereas the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign 

Assets Control (OFAC) designated 11 entities and individuals involved in procurement on behalf of Iran’s ballistic missile program in 2016; 

Whereas, in 2016, OFAC sanctioned Mabrooka Trading Co 

LLC (Mabrooka Trading)—based in the UAE—and its 

China- and UAE-based network that have been involved 

in procuring goods for Iran’s ballistic missile program; 

Whereas OFAC targeted two Iranian regime-linked networks 

pursuant to Executive Order 13382 (2005) for engaging 

in covert procurement activities benefitting multiple Iranian military organizations in August 2019; 

Whereas the second network targeted by OFAC in August 

2019 was led by Seyed Hossein Shariat and procured 

various aluminum alloy products on behalf of components 

entities owned or controlled by Iran’s Ministry of Defense 

and Armed Forces Logistics; and 

Whereas the UAE’s lax enforcement of its antiproliferation 

export control laws have facilitated these violations of 

United States sanctions policy: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) condemns the failure of the United Arab 

3 Emirates (UAE) to effectively counter money laun4 dering activities conducted by Iranian companies to 

5 bypass United States sanctions on Iran; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 671 IH 

1 (2) urges the UAE to resolve existing short2 comings in its antimoney laundering laws and regu3 lations, as existing laws are not sufficient to deter 

4 the activities of rogue companies. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13-A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES  EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Larry L. Crawford, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report of WorldWater & Power Corp.:

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:



5.     The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Dated: November 1, 2007 |  | By:    | /s/LARRY L. CRAWFORD       
|----------------------- |  | ------ | ---------------------------
|                        |  | Name:  | Larry L. Crawford          
|                        |  | Title: | Principal Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
#### Napoleon Farfan et al., Respondents, v Rene Rivera et al., Defendants. Rita Mallick, Proposed Intervenor-Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 199]

In an action, inter alia, pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to declare the plaintiffs’ interest in a parcel of real property, the proposed intervenor, Rita Mallick, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated December 21, 2004, which denied her motion, among other things, for leave to intervene in this action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Denial of the appellant’s motion, among other things, for leave to intervene was justified on the ground that it was not accompanied by a proposed pleading *(see*CPLR 1014; *Matter of Zehnder v State of New York,*266 AD2d 224 [1999]). In any event, the appellant failed to make a sufficient threshold showing that she had a real and substantial interest in the property *(see Citibank, N.A. v Plagakis,*8 AD3d 604, 605 [2004]; *Sieger v Sieger,*297 AD2d 33, 35-36 [2002]). Crane, J.E, Luciano, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.
@article{1208596,
  author = {Christopher Baldwin and Adam Ehrenberg and Andrew Guo and Alexey Gorshkov},
  title = {Disordered Lieb-Robinson bounds in one dimension},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-06-22 04:06:00},
  publisher = {PRX Quantum},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=935342},
  language = {en},
}
#### UNITED STATES v. SHUMAN et al.

Civ. A. No. 22-C.

District Court, N. D. West Virginia.

March 25, 1940.

*252Joe V. Gibson, U. S. Atty., of Kingwood, W. Va., for Government.

Charles C. Scott, of Clarksburg, W. Va., for defendants.

HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.

Motion has been made by the defendants for leave to bring in a third party defendant under Rule 14 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

This action is upon a negotiable promissory note by plaintiff as a purchaser and holder in due course. Answer and demand for a trial by jury were timely filed by defendants. More than eight months after filing their answer, but within one week of the date of trial, defendants filed this motion for leave to bring in a third party defendant under Rule 14.

Such motion comes too late. To permit a third party proceeding at this time would further delay the trial of this case. It is the duty of the courts to see that Rule 14 is not used for that purpose. The remedy provided by the rule must be exercised promptly. The new rules must be given a liberal interpretation but must not be so construed as to cause or encourage delay in the speedy disposition of cases. To do so would defeat one of the primary purposes of the rules.

The motion will be denied.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The undersigned, Eugene Malobrodsky, the Chief Executive Officer of INTELLIGENT BUYING. INC.  (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 12th day of May 2011.





/s/Eugene Malobrodsky





Eugene Malobrodsky


Principal Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Intelligent Buying, Inc. and will be retained by Intelligent Buying, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           BD
<LEGEND>
    
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     financial statements for the year ended May 31, 1998 and is qualified in
     its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            MAY-31-1998   
<PERIOD-START>                               JUN-01-1997  
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAY-31-1998

<CASH>                                         1,039,121
<RECEIVABLES>                                 72,730,016 
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                    0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                           67,969,111
<PP&E>                                        18,011,262
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               188,473,614
<SHORT-TERM>                                           0
<PAYABLES>                                    21,392,539
<REPOS-SOLD>                                           0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                    0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                            28,687,486
<LONG-TERM>                                    3,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         143,432
<OTHER-SE>                                   125,284,416
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 188,473,614
<TRADING-REVENUE>                             99,776,365
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           7,773,383
<COMMISSIONS>                                 52,993,869
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                          0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                  3,567,837
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               798,949
<COMPENSATION>                                54,170,954
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               19,435,815
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    11,960,319
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  11,960,319
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.89
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 6 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-152]



[[Page 988]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (including the 
States of Alaska, California, Hawaii, and Nevada )

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, February 18, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227, or 
(206) 220-6098.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Wednesday, February 18, 2009, at 2 p.m. Pacific Time. You can submit 
written comments to the panel by faxing the comments to 206-220-5760, 
or write to Janice Spinks, TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, 
Seattle, WA 98174. Due to limited conference lines, notification of 
intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be 
made with Janice Spinks. Ms. Spinks can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6098, or you can contact us at http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: December 22, 2008.
Roy L. Block,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
 [FR Doc. E9-152 Filed 1-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-5,483-21

IN RE MERIA JAMES BRADLEY, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 1328927-C IN THE 183rd DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the 183 District Court of Harris County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the rd

application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Harris

County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas

corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be

investigated (see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that
2

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Harris County. Should the

response include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was

served with the habeas application shall also be submitted with the response. This application for

leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the

appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: July 15, 2015

Do not publish
1 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

EX PARTE: §

§

§ No

.

___________________ JESUS ARANDA LUJAN §

§

PETITIONER ’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO

FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Jesus Aranda Lujan, Petitioner, moves this Court to extend the time for the

filing of his Petition for Discretionary Review and in support would show pursuant

to Rule 68.2(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The final order of the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Judicial District was

filed on July 15, 2015. Appendix

– Exhibit C. Petitioner attempted to file the

Petition with this Court on August 14, 2015 in a traditional manner, i.e., with paper,

pre-paid postage and U.S. mail. However, such was returned by the Court ’s Clerk

because the petition was not filed using the Court ’ s electronic filing system.

Petitioner requests that the Court allow for the timely filing of the Petition.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

FOR THESE REASONS, Jesus Aranda Lujan, Pet itioner , prays that this

Honorable Court grant this request for an extension to file the Petition for

Discretionary Review . Petitioner prays for general relief.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Steve Spurgin

___________________ STEVE SPURGIN PD-1099-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 8/24/2015 2:44:57 PM

Accepted 8/25/2015 5:32:48 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK2 Texas Bar No. 18974350

Post Office Drawer 1471

Marfa, Texas 79843

T (432 ) 729

- 3731

F (432) 729

- 3730

E steve@spurginlaw.com

El Paso Office:

8300 Montana Ave.

El Paso, Texas 79925

T (915) 779

- 2800

F (915) 779

- 2801

E steve@spurginlaw.com

Attorney for P etitioner/Appellant

Jesus Aranda Lujan

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned does hereby certify that on the 2 4 th day of A ugust 2015 a

copy of the foregoing motion for extension to file p etition for discretionar y review

was sent by U.S. Mail and electronic service to Arvel R. (Rod) Ponton, 83 rd Distric t

Attorney, 400 South Nelson, Fort Stockton, Texas 79736 and at rod.83 rd @att.net

.

/s/Steve Spurgin

___________________ STEVE SPURGIN3 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

I hereby certify that the foregoing consists of 160 wo rds according to the

Word Count program on Microsoft Word and is typed in 1 3

- point Times New

Roman font

.

/s/Steve Spurgin

___________________ STEVE SPURGIN
Labor Employer Reporting Instructions

Part V - Reports of Creditable Service and Compensation 

Chapter 5: Filing Instructions for Form BA-6a, Form BA-6 Address Report

1

Purpose of Form BA-6a 

Employee address records are maintained for the purpose of mailing to the employee Form BA6, "Certificate of Service Months and Compensation". This report is due by April 1 each year. 

Employers are required to file Form BA-6a, "Form BA-6 Address Report" with the RRB if they 

have hired new employees. If you have no new hires, no address report is necessary. 

New and Expanded Fields

The field sizes for the address report have been expanded and a new date field (Effective Date) 

has been added to help ensure that we have the most current information on the employee's 

record. You can now submit the employee's full name and middle initial. We will be able to 

accept up to 20 characters of the surname; and 15 characters of the first name. 

Detailed instructions for completing Form BA-6 are located on the form 

Report Current Employee Address Changes

Employers may also include the address changes of current employees on the form as well; this 

is optional. The new date field for the address will enhance the RRB's acceptance of changes of 

address. The effective date will allow the RRB to evaluate the address change submitted by the 

employer against changes-of-address received from other sources such as the US Postal Service 

and the employee; and use the most current one received.

Employee Reports Change of Address 

Even though the employer may submit address changes to the RRB via BA-6a, it is still the 

employee's responsibility to report any address changes. Instructions for employees to report 

address changes are on the employee's Form BA-6, Certificate of Service Months and 

Compensation. An employee can also report an address change to their local RRB office. 

Reporting Media 

Addresses for new hires and address changes for current employees may be reported on:

 Paper Form BA-6a, Form BA-6 Address Report (See Exhibits); 

 Magnetic media (See Form BA-6a cartridge/disk/CD-ROM format in Appendix I); 

 Computer listing. (The computer listing should include the fields from the paper form in 

the same order and should identify the tape positions at the top of each field column.); 

 Employer Reporting System (ERS) on the Internet; 

 Secure E-mail; 

 File Transfer Protocol (FTP) 

Please See Part V, Chapter 1 for more information on filing options. 
Labor Employer Reporting Instructions

Part V - Reports of Creditable Service and Compensation 

Chapter 5: Filing Instructions for Form BA-6a, Form BA-6 Address Report

2

Incorrect Addresses

Should the U.S. Postal Service return Form BA-6, "Certificate of Service Months and 

Compensation", we will attempt to secure an accurate address. The RRB uses address 

information from the postal service and telephone directories. If the RRB is unsuccessful in 

securing a valid address, we will contact the employer for assistance.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 13, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00118

- CR

Roxanne Y. CHAVEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, B exar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR0769

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

The court has considered Appellant’s motion for rehearing and motion for en banc

reconsideration. The motions are DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 49.5, 49.7.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alv arez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of August, 2018

.___________________________________ K eith E . H ottle

Clerk of Court
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 181st District Court of Randall County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on March 31,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

James Charles Bedree v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-14-00009-CR Trial Court Number: 23,626-B

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated March 31, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended for which

let execution issue.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on July 17, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

To the Board of Directors

Northeast Bancorp

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-85206), (No. 33-32095), (No. 33-58538), (No. 33-32096) and (No. 33-87976) of Northeast Bancorp of our report dated August 2, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Northeast Bancorp and Subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2002.