alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 6 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-153]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, 
Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 3, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Coffman at 1-888-912-1227, or 
(206) 220-6096

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, February 3, 2009, at 1 p.m. Pacific Time. For more 
information, please contact Dave Coffman. Mr. Coffman may be reached at 
1-888-912-1227, or (206) 220-6095. You can submit written comments to 
the panel by faxing the comments to (206) 220-5760, or by mail to 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, 915 Second Avenue, Stop W-406, Seattle, WA 
98174, or you can post comments to the Website at http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: December 22, 2008.
Roy L. Block,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
 [FR Doc. E9-153 Filed 1-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 620 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 620

                     In the Matter of Nancy Pelosi.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2019

    Mr. Abraham (for himself and Mr. Allen) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ethics, and in 
  addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                     In the Matter of Nancy Pelosi.

    Resolved, That pursuant to Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 of the 
United States Constitution, Representative Nancy Pelosi, be, and she 
hereby is, expelled from the House of Representatives and the Office of 
the Speaker is declared to be vacant.
                                 <all>
```
---

**Exhibit 32.1**

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND  
|----------------------------------------------
|CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO           
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Cory Turner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Clean Power Concepts Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(i)  | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the three months ending September 30, 2007, and to which this
      certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934, as amended; and
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           

| | By:    | /s/ Cory Turner            
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| | Name:  | Cory Turner                
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer    
| |        | and Chief Financial Officer
| | Date:  | November 13, 2007          

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1912

DONNA GARDNER, individually and as Personal Representative 

of the Estate of Lewis C. Gardner,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District 

Judge. (3:13-cv-00063-JFA)

Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: October 24, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donna Gardner, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Donna Gardner appeals the district court’s order 

granting the Government’s motion to enforce a settlement 

agreement with respect to Gardner’s wrongful death action. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Gardner v. United States, No. 3:13-cv-00063-JFA (D.S.C. 

July 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
@article{1212716,
  author = {David Travis Gallagher and Biao Ruan and Yanan He and Yingwei Chen and Eun Jung Choi and Yihong Chen and Dana Motabar and Tsega Solomon and Richard Simmerman and Thomas Kauffman and John Orban and Philip Bryan},
  title = {Design and characterization of a protein fold switching network},
  year = {2023},
  number = {14},
  month = {2023-01-26 05:01:00},
  publisher = {Nature Communications},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36065-3},
  language = {en},
}
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Red Lake Exploration, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      John Di Cicco, Chief Financial Officer of the Company and a member of the Board
      of Directors, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:


(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ John
                Di CiccoJohn
                  Di Cicco
                Chief
                    Financial Officer
                  
                  September 13,
                    2007
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 13, 2015

No. 04-15-00407-CV

IN RE ATLANTIC SOUNDING CO., INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On July 6, 2015, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court is of the opinion 

that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real party in interest may file a response to 

the petition in this court no later than August 4, 2015. Any such response must conform to 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. 

It is so ORDERED on July 13, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. DC-14-844, styled Juan Gonzalez v. Atlantic Sounding Co., Inc., pending 

in the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas, the Honorable Ana Lisa Garza presiding.
#### In the Matter of Radames S. and Others, Children Alleged to be Abused and/or Neglected. Maria I., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

[976 NYS2d 458]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Carol R. Sherman, J.), entered on or about October 17, 2012, which, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent mother abused her daughter and derivatively neglected the child’s two siblings, released the children to respondent’s care with 12 months of supervision by petitioner Administration for Children’s Services, unanimously affirmed, insofar as it brings up for review the fact-finding determination, and the appeal therefrom otherwise dismissed as moot, without costs. Appeal from *434fact-finding order, same court and Judge, entered on or about April 20, 2012, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as superseded by the appeal from the order of disposition.

The determination that respondent abused her eight-month-old non-ambulatory daughter is supported by a preponderance of the evidence, including the undisputed fact that the child sustained three separate injuries — two skull fractures and a fracture of the humerus — that ordinarily would not have occurred absent acts or omissions of respondent and her mother, who were the child’s only caretakers *(see*Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [ii]; [b] [i]; *Matter of Philip M.,*82 NY2d 238, 243-244 [1993]; *Matter of Matthew O. [Kenneth O.],*103 AD3d 67, 72-73 [1st Dept 2012]).

Respondent failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the child’s injuries *(see Matter of Philip M.,*82 NY2d at 244). Her explanation that the child fell in her crib about a month earlier and hit the side of her head on a toy attached to the railing was not sufficient to explain the acute skull fracture or the humerus fracture, nor did it adequately explain the older skull fracture, which occurred on the back of the child’s head *(compare Matter of Amir L. [Chantel B.],*104 AD3d 505, 506 [1st Dept 2013]).

Respondent’s abuse of her daughter warrants the finding of derivative neglect as to the other two children, who both at times resided with her *(see Matter of Matthew O.,*103 AD3d at 76). Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Renwick, Feinman and Clark, JJ.
Order entered July 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00158-CR

FERNANDO MUNOZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-00579-M

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant 

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any 

other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 

trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 

appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeal.
 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, 

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date 

of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal 

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
@article{1216381,
  author = {Zhaoqiang Zhang and Zeyu Deng and Hayden Evans and Dinesh Mullangi and Chengjun Kang and Shing Peh and Yuxiang Wang and Craig Brown and John Wang and Pieremanuele Canepa and Anthony Cheetham and Dan Zhao},
  title = {Exclusive Recognition of CO2 from Hydrocarbons by Aluminum Formate with Hydrogen-Confined Pore Cavities},
  year = {2023},
  number = {145},
  month = {2023-05-31 00:05:00},
  publisher = {Journal of the American Chemical Society},
  doi = {https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c01705},
  language = {en},
}
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from SEC
Form 10-K and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-01-1996             
<PERIOD-START>                  DEC-04-1995             
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-01-1996             
<CASH>                            3,088              
<SECURITIES>                          0          
<RECEIVABLES>                    20,128         
<ALLOWANCES>                      1,043          
<INVENTORY>                      11,544            
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 36,523           
<PP&E>                           41,963            
<DEPRECIATION>                   24,239           
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   74,720             
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            17,889           
<BONDS>                          47,388             
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             2,955             
<PREFERRED>                           3              
<COMMON>                             10              
<OTHER-SE>                          523             
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     74,720             
<SALES>                         151,747              
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                151,747              
<CGS>                            96,190             
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    96,190               
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0       
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                6,398            
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   8,845             
<INCOME-TAX>                      3,530              
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               5,315              
<DISCONTINUED>                        0              
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0               
<CHANGES>                             0              
<NET-INCOME>                      5,315            
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      4.76               
<EPS-DILUTED>                      4.76              
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.3**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P (the
      “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      James G. Jackson, Chief Financial Officer of BreitBurn GP, LLC, the general
      partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
      to
      my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.


/s/
                      JAMES G. JACKSONJames
                      G. Jackson*Co-Chief
                        Executive Officer of BreitBurn GP,
                        LLC*


Dated:
      May 12, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND 1997 AND FOR EACH OF THE YEARS
IN THE TWO-YEAR PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          91,354
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  492,807
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (60,505)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,248,007
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,857,924
<PP&E>                                         706,465
<DEPRECIATION>                               (605,167)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,305,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,776,548
<BONDS>                                        868,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,284,970
<COMMON>                                         2,644
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,626,462)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,305,700
<SALES>                                      1,317,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,317,600
<CGS>                                          945,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,407,903
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             307,331
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,392,225)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,392,225)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,392,225)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Omitted because of antidilutive effect on Net Loss.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Chanyah H., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Stephanie H. et al., Appellants; Children’s Aid Society, Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 881]

Order, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about December 1, 2004, which, after a fact-finding determination that respondents had permanently neglected the child, terminated their parental rights, and transferred custody and guardianship to petitioner and the New York City Commissioner of Social Services with authority to consent to adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and

*450convincing evidence that despite the agency’s diligent efforts, respondents failed to regularly visit their child and the mother continued to test positive for drugs *(Matter of Daniella C.G., 25*AD3d 494 [2006], *lv denied*6 NY3d 715 [2006]). The determination that it would be in the child’s best interests to terminate parental rights and free her for adoption is supported by a preponderance of the evidence *(Matter of Star Leslie W.,*63 NY2d 136 [1984]). The circumstances do not warrant a suspended judgment *(Matter of Mary-Athena A.C.,*19 AD3d 140 [2005]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Andrias, Sullivan, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
**IMMUCELL CORPORATION**

**EXHIBIT 31**

**RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Michael F. Brigham, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of ImmuCell Corporation; 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4.    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to me by others, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; 

b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 33-8392]; 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:        March 24, 2008 

/s/ Michael F. Brigham 

Michael F. Brigham 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer