alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,747,919                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  722,627                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (328,841)                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,906,738                       0
<PP&E>                                       4,297,755                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,554,603)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,927,296                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          634,999                       0
<BONDS>                                      1,985,541                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         6,527                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,835,229                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,927,296                       0
<SALES>                                      4,784,868                 957,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,280,016               3,378,627
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,509,515               1,768,182
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             265,072                  44,780
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,505,429               1,565,665
<INCOME-TAX>                                   465,602                 465,602
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,039,827               1,100,063
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,039,827               1,100,063
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21                    0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19                    0.20
        

</TABLE>
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60144

Conference Calendar

__________________

JOSE LUIS MORGADO-SALGADO,

 Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION and NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

 Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals

INS No. A29-982-234

- - - - - - - - - -

(October 17, 1995)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Luis Morgado-Salgado (Morgado) asserts that the Board

of Immigration Appeals (BIA) abused its discretion in affirming

the order of the Immigration Judge denying his petition to

suspend his deportation. Morgado argues that his deportation

would result in "extreme hardship." See 8 U.S.C. § 1254(a)(1);

Hernandez-Cordero v. I.N.S., 819 F.2d 558, 560 (5th Cir. 1987)(en

banc). The BIA's finding regarding extreme hardship is reviewed
No. 95-60144

-2-

under a strict standard for abuse of discretion. HernandezCordero, 819 F.2d at 561-63. 

Procedurally, review is limited to determination whether the

BIA gave any consideration to the relevant factors establishing

extreme hardship. Id. at 563. Substantively, we may find that

the BIA abused its discretion only in a case in which "the

hardship is uniquely extreme, at or closely approaching the outer

limits of the most severe hardship the alien could suffer and so

severe that any reasonable person would necessarily conclude that

the hardship is extreme." Id.

The BIA specifically stated its findings regarding each

factor that Morgado asserts was relevant to the suspension of his

deportation. The BIA found that Morgado presented evidence that

his deportation would be economically detrimental; however, he

did not present evidence that his hardship was "uniquely extreme"

or one of the most severe hardships that a deported alien would

face. The BIA did not abuse its discretion either procedurally

or substantively.

The petition for review is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


February 20, 2013


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A by Kaiser Aluminum Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report”), as filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the undersigned, Daniel J. Rinkenberger, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officer’s knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the date first above written.





/s/ Daniel J. RinkenbergerDaniel J. RinkenbergerPrincipal Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kaiser Aluminum Corporation and will be retained by Kaiser Aluminum Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Phon-Net.com Exhibit 10.3





                                  Exhibit 10.3

                              CONSULTING AGREEMENT

       This Consulting Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into this 31st day
of October 2001 is by and amongst PHON-NET. COM, INC. (the "Company") and
Grahame Entwistle (The "Consultant").
       WHEREAS, Consultant has agreed to serve as the Company's chief technical
officer; and
       WHEREAS, the Company desires to retain the Consultant subject to the
terms of this Agreement;
       NOW THEREFORE,  in consideration  of the mutual covenants  contained
herein and other good and valuable consideration receipt whereof is hereby
acknowledged it is agreed.
       1. The Company hereby engages the Consultant and the Consultant hereby
accepts this engagement on a non-exclusive basis pursuant to the terms and
conditions of this Consulting Agreement for a term commencing on execution of
this Agreement and terminating October 31, 2002.
       2. Consultant shall assist the Company with developing and implementing
various aspects of its information technology network and development.
Consultant shall also assist with development of the Company's telecommunication
projects. Consultant will be available on an "As Needed" basis.
       3. In consideration of the services to be provided, Consultant shall
receive as compensation for services rendered a total of 250,000 shares of the
Company's common stock.
       4. The Company will register these shares pursuant to a registration
statement on Form S-8.
       5. Except as otherwise provided herein, any notice or other communication
to any party pursuant to or relating to this Agreement and the transactions
provided for herein shall be deemed to have been given or delivered when
deposited in the United States Mail, registered or certified, and with proper
postage and registration or certification fees prepaid, addressed at their
principal place of business or to such other address as may be designated by
either party in writing.
       6. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted pursuant to the
laws of the state of Florida. By entering into this Agreement, the parties agree
to the jurisdiction of the Alberta courts with venue in Calgary, Alberta. In the
event of any breach of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to
recover all costs including reasonable attorney's fees.
       7. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
which when so executed an delivered shall be deemed an original, and it shall
not be necessary, in making proof of this Agreement to produce or account for
more than one counterpart.
       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have subscribed their hands an
seals the day and year first above written.

       CONSULTANT:                               COMPANY:
                                                 PHON-NET.COM, INC.

       /s/Grahame Entwistle                      /s/ Todd Violette
       --------------------                      ------------------
       Grahame Entwistle                         Todd Violette, pres
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey R. Mason, Principal Accounting Officer of Quartz
Mountain Resources Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 20-F of
the Company for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005 (the Annual Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the
  Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
  and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:  | 15 December 2005            
|------ | ----------------------------
|       |                             
|       | /s/ Jeffrey R. Mason        
|       |                             
|By:    | Jeffrey R. Mason            
|Title: | Principal Accounting Officer

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
  20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
  except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
  purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
  "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
  reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
  Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates
  it by reference.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------



                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landauer, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William E. Saxelby, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

i.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

ii.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
      of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



                                    /s/  William E. Saxelby
                                    ------------------------------------
                                    William E. Saxelby
                                    President & Chief Executive Officer



August 7, 2008
#### Nora Johnson et al., Respondents, v Evergistro Paulino et al., Appellants.

[852 NYS2d 772]

Defendants established a prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by submitting the affirmed reports of a neurologist and an orthopedist, who reviewed plaintiffs’ medical records, examined plaintiffs and performed detailed and objective tests before concluding that plaintiffs had full range of motion in their cervical and lumbar spines and left shoulders, and that plaintiff Nora Johnson had full range of motion in her left knee, and plaintiff Sylvester Johnson had full range of motion in his left elbow. The physicians also concluded that plaintiffs had recovered from the sprain- and strain-type injuries suffered as a result of the motor vehicle accident *(see Thompson v Abbasi,*15 AD3d 95, 96 [2005]).

In opposition, Nora failed to submit evidence demonstrating limited ranges of motion in her left shoulder and knee based upon objective medical findings that were made within a reasonable time after the accident *(see Lloyd v Green,*45 AD3d 373 [2007]), and her examining physician failed to adequately *380explain the basis for his conclusion that Nora’s injuries were caused by the subject accident, as opposed to degenerative disease evidenced in the record *(see Montgomery v Pena,*19 AD3d 288 [2005]). Regarding Sylvester, while his examining physician’s report attempted to set forth range of motion findings with respect to Sylvester’s spine and shoulder, it did not compare those findings to the standards for normal ranges of motion *(see Vasquez v Reluzco,*28 AD3d 365 [2006]).

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Gonzalez, Buckley and Acosta, JJ.
#### Russell Allen NORDYKE; Ann Sallie Nordyke, dba TS Trade Shows; Jess B. Guy; Duane Darr; William J. Jones; Daryl N. David; Tasiana Westyschyn; Jean Lee; Todd Baltes; Dennis Blair, R.L. Adams; Roger Baker; Mike Fournier; Virgil McVicker, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mary V. KING; Gail Steele; Wilma Chan; Keith Carson; Scott Haggerty; County of Alameda; County of Alameda Board of Supervisors, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-15763.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 4, 2012.

Donald Kilmer, Jr., The Law Offices of Donald Kilmer, San Jose, CA, Don Kates, *829Michel & Associates, P.C., Long Beach, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Thomas Peter Pierce, Richards, Watson & Gershon, Los Angeles, CA, Sayre Weaver, Esquire, Richards, Watson & Gershon, Brea, CA, Richard E. Winnie, Esquire, Office of County Counsel, Oakland, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, HARRY PREGERSON, STEPHEN REINHARDT, DIARMUID F. O’SCANNLAIN, MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, SUSAN P. GRABER, RONALD M. GOULD, RICHARD C. TALLMAN, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Order; Concurrence by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.; Dissent by Chief Judge KOZINSKI.

ORDER

The panel believes that the parties should attempt to settle this dispute by agreeing on the conditions for holding gun shows at the Aameda County fairgrounds, with the assistance of mediation. The case is referred to the Circuit Mediation Office for mediation, and its submission is deferred for 45 days or pending further order of the court.

The Circuit Mediator will contact the parties as soon as possible and shall provide a status report to the panel no later than 45 days following this order.

M. SMITH, Circuit Judge,

concurring:

I concur with the Court’s order sending this case to mediation. However, I would have attached a copy of a proposed disposition in this case so that the parties would know what they would face in the event mediation fails.

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge,

with whom GOULD, Circuit Judge, joins,

dissenting:

The parties have not asked for mediation; they have said nothing that suggests mediation would be fruitful; when asked about it in court, they displayed obvious distaste for the idea. We overstep our authority by forcing the parties to spend time and money engaging in a mediation charade. Our job is to decide the case, and do so promptly. This delay serves no useful purpose; it only makes us look foolish. I want no part of it.
EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Camelot  Corporation,   a  Nevada
corporation (the  "Company"),  on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2012 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned,  the Chief  Executive  Officer,  hereby  certifies
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Sec.  1350 as adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the undersigned's knowledge:

     (1)  the  Report  of the  Company  filed  today  fully  complies  with  the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: August 14, 2012                  By: /s/ Andrea Lucanto
                                          --------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Andrea Lucanto
                                       Title: President, Chief Executive Officer
                                              and Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Howard A. Silverman, an Attorney, Resignor.

[976 NYS2d 900]

Voluntary resignation accepted and name removed from roll of attorneys. Present — Smith, J.E, Fahey, Garni, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ. (Filed Dec. 3, 2013.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             763
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   763
<PP&E>                                         246,085
<DEPRECIATION>                                (81,356)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 166,476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,081
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,957
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   166,476
<SALES>                                         40,903
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,903
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,414
<INCOME-TAX>                                       377
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,037
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,037
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.96
        

</TABLE>