alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 A0 75 0 . DEW ANTEZ CHESTER v . AUTOVEST, LLC.

Dewan t ez Ch es t e r

, t h e d efen d an t i n t h i s ci v i l act i on

, fi l ed t h i s d i rect ap p eal

fro m t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er den y i n g h i s O CGA § 9 -1 1-6 0 (d ) m o t io n t o s et as i d e t h e

d efau l t ju d g m en t ag ai n s t h i m . W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n.

“ [T] h e d en i al o f a m o t i o n t o s et as i d e a fi n al ju d g m en t un d er OCGA § 9 -1 1 -6 0

i s n o t di rect l y a p p e a lab l e an d i n s t ead req u i res t h e fi li n g o f an ap p l i cat i o n fo r

d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal u n der OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (b ).” Ji m El li s At la n ta v. A da ms o n

, 2 8 3

Ga. Ap p

. 1 1 6

, 1 1 6 (6 4 0 SE2 d 6 8 8 ) (2 0 06 ); s ee OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (8 ). Ch es t er’ s

fai l u re t o fo l l ow t h e req u i red ap p el l at e p ro ced u re d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri sd i ct i o n o v er t h i s

ap p eal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. December 11, 2018

12/11/2018
#### MALYN v. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO.

No. 1208.

District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

Feb. 26, 1942.

Portser, Gregg & McConnell, of Greens-burg, Pa., for plaintiff.

William H. Eckert and Smith, Buchanan & Ingersoll, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

McVICAR, District Judge.

This action is before us on plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant’s answer from the record, and also, on plaintiff’s motion to remand this action to the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania.

Motion to Strike.

The motion to strike should be refused. Rule 8(d), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, provides that averments in a pleading to which a responsive answer is required, other than as to the amount of damage, are admitted when not denied in the responsive pleading.

Plaintiff, in her second reason in support of her motion to remand, alleges that defendant “by indirection and inference, admits that $2500.00, * * * is justly due and payable to the plaintiff.”

At the oral argument of the above motions, defendant’s attorney admitted that there was $2,500 due from defendant to plaintiff by virtue of the cause of action alleged in plaintiff’s complaint, and that it was willing to pay the same at any time.

Rule 12(e) provides that a party may move for a more definite statement, or for a bill of particulars of any matter which is not averred with sufficient definiteness or particularity to enable the pleader to prepare his responsive pleading or to prepare for trial. The rule further provides, that if the motion is granted and if it is not complied with, within the time specified, the court may strike the pleading to which the motion was directed or make such order as it deems just.

Motion to Remand.

This motion cannot be sustained under the law and for the reasons set forth in Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co., 303 U.S. 283, 58 S.Ct. 586, 82 L.Ed. 845; Morrow v. Mutual Casualty Co. of Chicago, D.C.Ky., 20 F.Supp. 193; In re Metropolitan Railway Receivership, 208 U.S. 90, 28 S.Ct. 219, 52 L.Ed. 403; 2 Cyclopedia of Federal Procedure, pages 66, 67 and on page 70.
, FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

July 9, 2015

ABELACOSTA. CLERK

PD-0330-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 7/8/2015 11:08:03 PM

Accepted 7/9/2015 5:01:42 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK

PD-0330-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

JAY SANDON COOPER

v. ASTATE OF TEXAS

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

NOW COMES JAY SANDON COOPER, and makes this first motion to

extend the time to file a motion for rehearing. In support thereof, Mr. Cooper

shows:

1. This Court refused Defendant's Petition for Discretionary Review on June

24, 2015. Fifteen days thereafter would be July 9, 2015, on which date Defendant

expects that his Motion for Rehearing or this Motion to Extend Time should be

due.

2. Defendant seeks an extension ofthirty (30) days, to August 8, 2015.

3. Defendant was released from the Collin County Jail on June 30, 2015, and

did not learn of this Court's refusal of his PDR until a date thereafter. During his

incarceration of 14 days, Defendant was unable to stay abreast of recent court

rulings that might impact this case. As well, because of his confinement,

Defendant was unable to stay current on this and other cases, and needs some

additional time to do justice with this and other pending cases.

Defendant's Motion to Extend Time to File Motion for Rehearing: Page 1

r^
4. Because Defendant was arrested not for DWI, but for refusing to participate

in roadside field sobriety tests that are not required by law, Defendant anticipates

briefing this Court on an extension of the landmark case: Miranda v. Arizona. 384

U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 ... (1966).

5. There have been no previous extensions sought or granted to file

Defendant's Motion for Rehearing in this case.

PRAYER

6. Defendant requests that this Court grant an extension of thirty (30) days to

August 8, 2015, for Defendant to file his Motion for Rehearing.

July 8, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jay Sandon Cooper

Jay Sandon Cooper

1520 JanwoodDr.

Piano, Texas 75075

(972)358-8999

NO FAX

JaySandonCooper@gmail.com

DEFENDANT

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Defendant spoke with Assistant District Attorney Karla Hackett on July 8,

2015, and the State expressed no position with regard to the relief requested in the

foregoing motion.

Defendant's Motion to Extend Time to File Motion for Rehearing: Page 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing and attached documents were

electronically served to the following recipients, if that option was available

through the electronic filing manager, and if not, it was mailed on July 8, 2015:

Karla R. Hackett

Assistant District Attorney

Grayson County, Texas

200 S. Crockett, Suite 116A

Sherman, Texas 75090

and

Lisa C. McMinn

State Prosecuting Attorney

P.O. Box 13046

Austin, Texas 78711-3046

/s/ Jay Sandon Cooper

Jay Sandon Cooper

Defendant's Motion to Extend Time to File Motion for Rehearing: Page 3
IV 

House Calendar No. 54 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 708 

[Report No. 116–297] 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 3055) 

making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce and Justice, 

Science, and Related Agencies for the fiscal year ending September 

30, 2020, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2019 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the 

bill (H.R. 3055) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce and Justice, Science, and Related 

Agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill 

3 (H.R. 3055) making appropriations for the Departments 

4 of Commerce and Justice, Science, and Related Agencies 

5 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020, and for 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 708 RH 

1 other purposes, with the Senate amendment thereto, and 

2 to consider in the House, without intervention of any point 

3 of order, a motion offered by the chair of the Committee 

4 on Appropriations or her designee that the House concur 

5 in the Senate amendment with an amendment inserting 

6 the text of Rules Committee Print 116-38 in lieu of the 

7 matter proposed to be inserted by the Senate. The Senate 

8 amendment and the motion shall be considered as read. 

9 The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided 

10 and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member 

11 of the Committee on Appropriations. The previous ques12 tion shall be considered as ordered on the motion to its 

13 adoption without intervening motion. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 54 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 708 

[Report No. 116–297] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendpurposes. year ending September 30, 2020, and for other tice, Science, and Related Agencies for the fiscal tions for the Departments of Commerce and Jus- ment to the bill (H.R. 3055) making appropriaNOVEMBER 18, 2019 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15172]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notification listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than July 13, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community 
Affairs Officer) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Charles B. Edel, Trustee of the Charles B. Edel Trust, and 
Suzanne Edel, Trustee of the Suzanne Edel Trust, both of Springfield, 
Missouri; acting in concert to increase control of Citizens National 
Bancorp Inc., Springfield, Missouri and thereby acquire control of 
Citzens National Bank of Springfield, Springfield, Missouri.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offerbacker, Assistant 
Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. David Carpenter, Chandler, Oklahoma as Trustee of the Lynda L. 
Cameron 2005 Family Trust, the William M. Cameron 2004 Family Trust, 
and the Lynda L. Cameron Trust B; to acquire control of First Fidelity 
Bancorp, Inc., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, and thereby indirectly acquire 
control of First Fidelity Bank, National Association, Oklahoma City, 
Oklahoma.
    2. Richard Kevin Chase, Derby, Kansas and Peter Cran Chase, 
Eastborough, Kansas; to acquire control of First Team Resources 
Corporation, Derby, Kansas, and thereby indirectly acquire control of 
Verus Bank National Association, Derby, Kansas.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice 
President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. James Edward Baxter,II, Richmond Virginia; to acquire shares of 
Premier Banchsares, Inc., McKinney, Texas, and thereby indirectly 
acquire control of Synergy Bank, SSB McKinney, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 23, 2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-15172 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### In the Matter of Lecknold M. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Marie M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Evelyn M. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Marie M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[822 NYS2d 137]

In two neglect proceedings (one as to each child), the mother appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Lerner, R.), dated September 7, 2005, which extended the placement of Lecknold M. until March 6, 2006, with a permanency plan of discharging him to independent living or to the care of a relative, and (2) an order of the same court, also dated September 7, 2005, which extended the placement of Evelyn M. until February 10, 2006, with a permanency plan of discharging her to independent living.

Ordered that the appeals from so much of the orders as extended the placement of the children are dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeals from so much of the orders as extended the place*617ment of the children must be dismissed as academic because the periods of placement set forth in the orders appealed from expired by their own terms *(see Matter of Anthony O.,*29 AD3d 591 [2006]; *Matter of Anthony O.,*22 AD3d 670 [2005]; *Matter of Anthony O.,*8 AD3d 573 [2004]).

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeals from so much of the orders as approved the permanency plans. Accordingly, counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]). Florio, J.E, Goldstein, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-12-0000838 

16-JUL-2015 

08:41 AM 

SCWC-12-0000838
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I 

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
 

vs.
 

ELUJINO V. ALVAREZ, III, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(CAAP-12-0000838; CR. NO. 11-1-0216)
 

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Elujino V. Alavarez, 

III’s application for writ of certiorari filed on June 5, 2015, 

is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The 

parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding 

scheduling. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, July 16, 2015. 

Brian J. De Lima 

and Justin P. Haspe


for petitioner
 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald


/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Exhibit 32.1


Form 10-K


Cardiff International, Inc.


File No. 000-49709











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT


TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Cardiff International, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Thompson, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  June 20, 2011
By: /s/ Daniel ThompsonChief Executive Officer, President
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15233]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to 21 USC 958(i), the Attorney General shall, prior to 
issuing a registration under this Section to a bulk manufacturer of a 
controlled substance in schedule I or II, and prior to issuing a 
regulation under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2) authorizing the importation of 
such a substance, provide manufacturers holding registrations for the 
bulk manufacture of the substance an opportunity for a hearing.
    Therefore, in accordance with Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations 
1301.34(a), this is notice that on May 22, 2009, Noramco, Inc., 
Division of Ortho-McNeil, Inc., 500 Swedes Landing Road, Wilmington, 
Delaware 19801, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of Tapentadol 
(9780), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to import an intermediate of the basic class 
listed for the bulk manufacture of Tapentadol which it will distribute 
to its customers.
    Any bulk manufacturer who is presently, or is applying to be, 
registered with DEA to manufacture such basic class of controlled 
substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the 
proposed registration and may, at the same time, file a written request 
for a hearing on such application pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43 and in 
such form as prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47.
    Any such comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA 22152; and must be filed no later 
than July 27, 2009.
    This procedure is to be conducted simultaneously with, and 
independent of, the procedures described in 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), 
(d), (e), and (f). As noted in a previous notice published in the 
Federal Register on September 23, 1975 (40 FR 43745-46), all applicants 
for registration to import a basic class of any controlled substance 
listed in schedule I or II are, and will continue to be, required to 
demonstrate to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion 
Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, that the requirements for 
such registration pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(a); 21 U.S.C. 823(a); and 
21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) are satisfied.

    Dated: June 22, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-15233 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Virgil Seals, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 671]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walsh, J.), dated January 30, 2012, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The People presented clear and convincing evidence to support a risk level three classification *(see*Correction Law § 168-n [3]; *People v Pettigrew,*14 NY3d 406 [2010]; *People v Mingo,*12 NY3d 563 [2009]; *People v Gilligan,*94 AD3d 844 [2012]). The defendant’s contention that the hearing court should not have considered his 1979 violent felony conviction in determining his risk assessment is without merit *(see People v Kitt,*47 AD3d 456 [2008]; *People v Camacho,*35 AD3d 424 [2006]; *People v Oginski,*35 AD3d 952 [2006]; *People v Sinclair,*23 AD3d 537 [2005]). In addition, there is no merit to the contention that the defendant was entitled to a downward departure to risk level two *(see People v Mingo,*12 NY3d 563 [2009]; *People v Wyatt,*89 AD3d *804112 [2011]; *People v Mabee,*69 AD3d 820 [2010]). Skelos, J.E, Balkin, Leventhal and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
ACCEPTED

04-14-00362-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

7/21/2015 11:53:49 AM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 07/21/15 11:53:49 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         271,455                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  445,006                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    95,845                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,584,320                       0
<PP&E>                                       4,088,221                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,391,987                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,384,304                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,744,476                       0
<BONDS>                                      2,851,829                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                    690,000                       0
<COMMON>                                       515,000                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,417,001)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,384,304                       0
<SALES>                                      4,970,356               1,120,592
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,101,437               1,164,514
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,271,870               1,405,298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             305,796                 108,117
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (476,229)               (348,901)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (21,702)                (26,953)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (454,527)               (321,948)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)                  (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Commissioner of Social Services, on Behalf of Elizabeth S., Appellant, v Julio J., Respondent.

Submitted October 15, 2012;

decided October 18, 2012

Motion for poor person relief granted.