alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



--------------------------------------------------------------------



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Equine Alliance Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Demitro Marianovich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Registrant         |  | Royal Equine Alliance Corporation                                                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  |                                                                                                        
|Date:  May 1, 2009 |  | By:  /s/ Demitro Marianovich                                                                           
|                   |  |                                                                                                        
|                   |  | Demitro Marianovich
Chief Executive Officer 
(Principle Executive Officer, Principle Financial Officer)

22



|
|
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00174-CV

In re Lennar Homes of Texas Sales 

and Marketing, Ltd. d/b/a Lennar 

Homes of Texas; Home Owners 

Management Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a 

Home of Texas; and Warranty 

Underwriters Insurance Company

§

§

§

§

§

Original Proceeding

From the 158th District Court

of Denton County (14-09627-158)

July 15, 2015

Opinion by Justice Gardner

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus filed by 

relators Lennar Homes of Texas Sales and Marketing, Ltd. d/b/a Lennar Homes 

of Texas; Home Owners Management Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Home of Texas;

and Warranty Underwriters Insurance Company. We conditionally grant part of 

the relief requested by relators. Writ will issue only if the trial court fails to vacate 

its April 23, 2015 order appointing a mediator and ordering Lennar Homes of 

Texas Sales and Marketing, Ltd. d/b/a Lennar Homes of Texas to pay the costs 

of mediation and fails to appoint a mediator in accordance with paragraph 16.2 of 

the Purchase Agreement and to assess mediation fees in accordance with 

paragraph 16.8.2 of the Purchase Agreement.
It is ordered that real parties in interest Chess Derrick Dennis Jr. and Jana 

Dennis shall pay all costs of this proceeding, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Anne Gardner _

 Justice Anne Gardner
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

November 17, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00686

- CV

THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO , acting by and through its agent, City Public Service Board d/b/a CPS Energy

, Appellant s

v.

Frank GOMEZ, Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI10475 Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

In this accelerated appeal, Appellant’s brief is due to be filed with this court on

Novemb er 22 , 201 7 . Before the brief was due, Appellant filed an unopposed first motion for extension of time to file Appellant’s brief until Dece mber 20 , 201 7 , for an extension of twenty

eight days.

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on Dece mber 20 , 201 7

. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(d).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 17th day of November, 2017

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 582 

Resolution to end the inquisition of President Donald J. Trump. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2019 

Mr. GOODEN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ethics 

RESOLUTION 

Resolution to end the inquisition of President Donald J. 

Trump. 

Whereas the Constitution of the United States exclusively 

vests the power to initiate impeachment with the House 

of Representatives; 

Whereas the Jefferson Manual explicitly states how impeachment proceedings may begin; 

Whereas during previous impeachment efforts, the House of 

Representatives explicitly authorized, per adopted Rules 

of the House of Representatives and longstanding House 

procedure, impeachment proceedings; 

Whereas, on July 17, 2019, the House of Representatives 

voted on House Resolution 498, impeaching Donald John 

Trump, President of the United States, of high misdemeanors; during that vote, the Resolution failed to pass 


dlhill on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 582 IH 

the House of Representatives as only 95 out of 234 

Democrats supported impeaching President Trump; 

Whereas the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of 

Representatives has perpetuated a tangential inquisition 

after the failure of House Resolution 498; 

Whereas, on August 8, 2019, Committee on the Judiciary 

Chairman Jerrold Nadler stated the Committee is undertaking an investigation of ‘‘all the evidence’’ and ‘‘will at 

the conclusion of this, hopefully by the end of the year 

vote articles of impeachment to the House floor or we 

won’t’’; 

Whereas, on September 16, 2019, Committee on the Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler stated the Committee is 

‘‘impeaching the president right now’’; 

Whereas the impeachment of President Trump has not been 

authorized by the House of Representatives; 

Whereas Representative Nadler is leading a biased, pre-determined impeachment effort of the president as opposed to 

executing his investigative duties and is unfit to serve as 

Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary of the 

House of Representatives; 

Whereas the current actions of the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives regarding impeachment are being conducted in violation of established 

House Rules, practices and principles as made evident 

from Chairman Nadler’s admissions; and 

Whereas clause two of Rule XXIII of the Rules of the House 

of Representatives provides, ‘‘A Member . . . of the 

House shall adhere to the spirit and the letter of the 

Rules of the House and to the rules of duly constituted 

committees thereof’’: Now, therefore, be it 


dlhill on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 582 IH 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution, Rep2 resentative Nadler is hereby removed as Chairman of the 

3 Committee on the Judiciary and from the Committee on 

4 the Judiciary. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE BALANCE SHEET
AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              73
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      806
<ALLOWANCES>                                        65
<INVENTORY>                                         16
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   955<F1>
<PP&E>                                           9,417
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,404
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,025<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,355<F1>
<BONDS>                                          1,257
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,595
<OTHER-SE>                                       (256)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,025<F1>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,536
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,714<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    701
<INCOME-TAX>                                       284
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                417
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                           50
<NET-INCOME>                                       467
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>RESTATED AS A RESULT OF THE MERGER OF BELL ATLANTIC CORPORATION AND NYNEX
CORPORATION COMPLETED ON AUGUST 14, 1997 AND ACCOUNTED FOR AS A POOLING OF
INTERESTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atwood Minerals and Mining Corp., a
Nevada corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending February
28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Greg Goldberg., Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002:





1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
              The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Greg
Goldberg





Greg
Goldberg


President


(Chief
Executive Officer and


Chief
Financial Officer)


April 14,
2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          27,357
<SECURITIES>                                     6,540
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,467
<ALLOWANCES>                                       576
<INVENTORY>                                        827
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,798
<PP&E>                                           4,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,753
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,133
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,107
<SALES>                                         11,792
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,269
<CGS>                                            2,806
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,309
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,882
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,415
<INCOME-TAX>                                       530
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,885
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,885
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   $ 0.35<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $ 0.31<F1>
<FN>
<F1>INFORMATION HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO.128. BASIC AND DILUTED
EPS HAVE BEEN REPORTED IN PLACE OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade et al., Respondents, v Michael R. Bloomberg, as Mayor of the City of New York, et al., Appellants. Livery Roundtable, Inc., et al., Intervenors-Respondents; Livery Base Owners, Inc., et al., Intervenors-Appellants. Taxicab Service Association et al., Respondents, v State of New York et al., Appellants. Livery Base Owners, Inc., et al., Intervenors-Appellants. Greater New York Taxi Association et al., Respondents, v State of New York et al., Appellants. Livery Base Owners, Inc., et al., Intervenors-Appellants.

Submitted March 4, 2013;

decided March 21, 2013

Motion by Office of the Manhattan Borough President for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeals herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and nine copies filed within seven days.
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-40671 Summary Calendar

ANTHONY LINDON BETHEL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

JIMMIE E. ALFORD, ET AL,

Defendants,

JIMMIE E. ALFORD,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Texas

(6:93-CV-186) February 6, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, District Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Appellant, a Texas Department of C riminal Justice prisoner,

sued nearly fifty defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and applied to

proceed in forma pauperis. His application was denied. Only one

defendant was served. That defendant answered and moved for

dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)( 6) which2

motion was granted. Later the district court also dismissed all

remaining defendants for lack of service. Appellant then moved for

relief under Rule 60(b)(6) which was denied, except t hat the

district court modified the dismissal of the unserved defendants to

be without prejudice. Appellant seeks to appeal all of the actions

of the district court. We find the appeal frivolous and dismiss.

Appellant’s notice of appeal is timely only with resp ect to

the district court’s denial of his Rule 60(b) motion. We therefore

have jurisdiction to review that matter only. We find no abuse of

discretion in the denial of that motion and affirm it.

Appellant’s brief in this court is largely incomprehensible.

He does not specifically address how the district court allegedly

abused its discretion in denying his motion and does not adequately

argue any point raised.

Appellant sought relief fro m his obligation to serve all of

the defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(c). That

Rule is inapplicable here because it deals only with pleadings

transmitted between defendants, not service by the plaintiff on a

defendant. Clearly the district court did not abuse its discretion

in denying relief.

Appellant is warned tha t the bringing of further frivolous

appeals will result in the imposition of sanctions.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit
32








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) of Sterling
Banks, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, we, Robert H King, President and Chief Executive Officer, and R.
Scott Horner, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Robert H.
      King
            /s/ R. Scott
      HornerRobert
      H. King
            R.
      Scott HornerPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
            Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer








Date:
March 8, 2010
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION 

TRIBAL GAMING REVENUES (in thousands) BY REGION 

FY 2002 and 2001 

FY 2002 FY 2001 Increase (decre

Number of Gaming Number Gaming Number of 

Operations Revenues Operations Revenues Operations R

Region I 72 $1,196,178 75 $1,013,470 (3) Region II 52 3,594,401 48 2,891,522 4 Region III 38 1,782,310 34 1,633,957 4 Region IV 75 3,523,690 79 3,254,151 (4) Region V 71 580,524 72 437,397 (1) Eastern Region 22 3,819,897 21 3,591,206 1 

Totals 330 $14,497,000 329 $12,821,703 1 

Compiled from gaming operation audit reports received and entered by the NIGC through 6/30/03. 

States Serviced by Regions 

Region I Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Washington. Region II California and Northern Nevada. 

Region III Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Southern Nevada. 

Region IV Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Wyoming Region V Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. Eastern Region Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, and New York.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 12, 2016

No. 04-16-00304-CV

PLATINUM RECOVERY & RECYCLING, LLC,

Appellant

v.

A-1 SPECIALIZED SERVICES, INC.,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-1428-CV

The Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s brief was due August 8, 2016. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of 

time has been filed. We order appellee A-1 Specialized Services, Inc.’s brief due August 22, 

2016. If the brief is not filed by the date ordered, we may order the case submitted without a 

brief from appellee.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of August, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
WSTL-EX10.5-Stump






Exhibit 10.5







May 22, 2013  




Mr. Benjamin S. Stump




Dear Ben,


I am pleased to offer you the position of Senior VP and Chief Technical Officer for 
Westell Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) reporting to me.


This position is based in New Jersey, but will still require some travel to customer sites
and Westell design centers as we have discussed previously.


Your start date in this role would be immediate upon acceptance of these terms.  Your
base salary for this position will be $235,000 per year ($9,038.46 per pay period).  You
will also be eligible for an incentive bonus annual target of $117,500, in accordance with
the terms and conditions of the FY2014 Westell Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Performance Bonus Plan, Consolidated Company Plan (“Bonus Plan”).  Your
participation in that plan will be based on the entire fiscal year (no proration), replacing
the bonus terms of your previous interim position letter of March 11, 2013 and the bonus
plan document sent to you dated May 3, 2013.   


In addition to the compensation noted above, and upon final approval by the Board of
Directors, you will be awarded: 1) a grant of Restricted Stock Units for the equivalent of
100,000 shares of Company stock; and 2) you will be eligible to participate in the long-
term, performance-based equity program currently being developed by the Compensation
Committee for Company Officers.  The Restricted Stock Units will be governed by the
Westell Technologies, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, and will vest at 25% each year
upon the anniversary of their grant.  A condition of vesting of each award is that you
remain employed at the Company on the applicable vesting date.


You will remain on the current Kentrox benefit programs until December 31, 2013 like
the other Kentrox employees.


This offer substitutes for and replaces the terms of Letter Agreement dated March 11,
2013 between you and Westell, Inc.  Upon acceptance of this offer, the Letter Agreement
dated March 11, 2013, and all prior agreements between you and Kentrox or between you
and the Company and its subsidiaries, will be terminated and have no continuing force or
effect.











The appointment as an Executive Officer and the above arrangements are subject to final
approval of the Company Board of Directors and its Compensation Committee, which we
anticipate receiving at the next meeting, scheduled for June 17, 2013.  




Sincerely,                        


/s/ Richard S. Gilbert


Richard S. Gilbert    
President and Chief Executive Officer    








Accepted:


/s/ Benjamin S. Stump            5/22/2013
_________________________    _______________
(signed)                (date)