alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Nieves, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 383]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melissa C. Jackson, J), entered on or about April 17, 2013, which denied defendant’s CPL 440.46 motion for resentencing, unanimously affirmed. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about June 3, 2013, which granted reargument but adhered to its prior determination, unanimously dismissed as academic.

The court properly exercised its discretion in determining that substantial justice dictated the denial of the motion *(see generally People v Gonzalez,*29 AD3d 400 [1st Dept 2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 867 [2006]). The court properly considered the totality of the circumstances, including defendant’s history of recidivism, absconding, and failing to profit from rehabilitation opportunities. These factors outweighed the positive factors cited by defendant *(see e.g. People v Hurst,*83 AD3d 499 [1st Dept 2011], *lv denied*17 NY3d 796 [2011]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P, Sweeny, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Porter
Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Maria L. Bouvette, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                      |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                       |  |  |  | PORTER BANCORP, INC.
|                       |  |  | 
|Dated: August 11, 2008 |  |  |  | By:                  |  | /s/ Maria L. Bouvette  
|                       |  |  |  |                      |  | Maria L. Bouvette      
|                       |  |  |  |                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### James L. Kapsis, Appellant, v Michael S. Peragine et al., Respondents.

Submitted August 27, 2012;

decided October 30, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]).
@article{1209196,
  author = {Thomas Kolibaba and Jason Killgore and Caleb Chandler and Dominique Porcincula and Michael Ford and Benjamin Fein-Ashley and Jason Brodsky and Alan Sellinger},
  title = {Influence of Fluorescent Dopants on the Vat Photopolymerization of Acrylate-based Plastic Scintillators},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-07-03 04:07:00},
  publisher = {Additive Manufacturing},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936236},
  language = {en},
}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DURON BOSTON PEOPLES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 507 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10th day of February, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### Thomas Paul WEST; Gregory Dickens; Charles M. Hedlund; Robert W. Murray; Theodore Washington; Todd Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Janice K. BREWER, Governor of Arizona; Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections; Ernest Trujillo; Carson McWilliams, *1085Warden, Arizona Department of Corrections-FIorence; Unknown Parties, named as Does 1-50, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-16707.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 18, 2011.

Dale A. Baich, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Golnoosh Farzaneh, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Robin C. Konrad, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FPDAZ-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Jonathan Bass, AGAZ-Office of the Arizona Attorney General, Tucson, AZ, Kent Ernest Cattani, Chief Counsel, Jeffrey A. Zick, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendants-Appellees.

D.C. No. 2:ll-cv-01409-NVW, District of Arizona, Phoenix.

Before: ANDREW J. KLEINFELD, KIM McLANE WARDLAW, and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Appellant Thomas Paul West’s petition for panel rehearing is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Cardiff International, Inc.
(the Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended herein as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
I. Daniel Thompson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                      |                         | Cardiff International, Inc.
|--------------------- | ----------------------- | ---------------------------
|Date: August 19, 2014 | By:                     | /s/ Daniel Thompson        
|                      | Daniel Thompson        
|                      | Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - 17 CFR Parts 210 and 229
          - [Release Nos. 33-8934A; 34-58028A; File No. S7-06-03]
          - RIN 3235-AJ64

# AGENCY:

Securities and Exchange Commission.

# ACTION:

Final rules; technical amendment.

# SUMMARY:

We are extending the effectiveness of § 210.2-02T published in 71 FR 47059 (August 15, 2006) and § 229.308T published in 71 FR 76595 (December 21, 2006) and amended in 73 FR 38099 (July 2, 2008) through June 30, 2010. The effective dates for the other sections of the July 2, 2008 document remain as published.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         The effectiveness of §§ 210.2-02T and 229.308T, which currently terminates on June 30, 2009, is extended through June 30, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Harrison, Special Counsel, Office of Rulemaking, Division of Corporation Finance, at (202) 551-3430, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-3628.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This technical amendment does not affect the effective date for compliance by a non-accelerated filer with the rules implementing Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Under the amendments previously adopted in Release No. 33-8934, a non-accelerated filer is required to file the auditor's attestation report on internal control over financial reporting when it files an annual report for a fiscal year ending on or after December 15, 2009. The sole purpose of this technical amendment is to provide that the amendments previously adopted in Release No. 33-8934 that currently are set forth in paragraph (b) of Rule 2-02T in Regulation S-X and in paragraph (c) of Item 308T of Regulation S-K remain in the CFR.

Dated: June 22, 2009.

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-15014 Filed 6-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      24,870,352
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         274,825
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,500,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 51,211,956
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      50,906,209
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        78,728,117
<LOANS>                                    329,744,072
<ALLOWANCE>                                  4,793,889
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             498,192,379
<DEPOSITS>                                 397,697,991
<SHORT-TERM>                                12,591,493
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,884,326
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,116,552
<OTHER-SE>                                  74,902,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             498,192,379
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             33,006,697
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            7,338,118
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               319,248
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            40,664,063
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          14,166,339
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          15,133,509
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       25,530,554
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  820,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             174,086
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             12,363,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             19,586,229
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  19,586,229
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                13,365,872
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.05
<LOANS-NON>                                    409,305
<LOANS-PAST>                                   648,480
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             4,645,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  742,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    71,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            4,794,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         4,794,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        180,000
        

</TABLE>
#### Manuel Reis, Respondent-Appellant, v Volvo Cars of North America et al., Appellants-Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Submitted July 1, 2013;

decided September 3, 2013

Motion to dismiss appeal taken by respondent-appellant Manuel Reis granted and that appeal dismissed, with $400 costs and $100 cost of motion, upon the ground that the two-Justice dissent at the Appellate Division is not on a question of law in favor of respondent-appellant *(see*CPLR 5601 [a]).

Judge Abdus-Salaam taking no part.
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                     /s/ Kent Anderson |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Kent      Anderson                                                                                          |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer                                                                                |
|   |                                                                                                        |
|   | Dated:      November 19, 2010                                                                               |

----
@misc{1214926,
  author = {Mei Lee Ngan and Patrick J. Grother and Austin Hom},
  title = {Face Analysis Technology Evaluation (FATE) Part 10: Performance of Passive, Software-based Presentation Attack Detection (PAD) Algorithms},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-09-19 04:09:00},
  publisher = {NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=956456},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8491},
  language = {en},
}
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00458

- CV

Frederick Stanton DUNCAN

, Appellant

v.

Shanna Nicole DUNCAN

, Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- CI

- 18794 Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. Costs of court for this appeal are taxed against Frederick Stanton

Duncan.

SIGNED September 4, 2019.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL DATA  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S  AUDITED FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED IN ITS REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE ANNUAL  PERIOD ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000811562
<NAME> KIMMINS CORP.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            194,202
<SECURITIES>                                   11,520,739
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13,231,983
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (551,355)
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               27,654,866
<PP&E>                                         62,977,876
<DEPRECIATION>                                (25,730,667)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 87,742,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          33,228,505
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            6,739
<OTHER-SE>                                      7,684,828
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   87,742,341
<SALES>                                        56,240,759
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               56,240,759
<CGS>                                          51,131,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  51,131,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                7,221,221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              5,000,457
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,748,465)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,408,389)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,340,076)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,340,076)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.73)


</TABLE>
@article{1210506,
  author = {Chad Cruz and John C. Stephenson and Sebastian Engmann and Emily Bittle and Jared Wahlstrand},
  title = {Pump-probe phase spectroscopy with submilliradian sensitivity and nanosecond time delay using Michelson interferometers},
  year = {2023},
  number = {31},
  month = {2023-04-17 04:04:00},
  publisher = {Optics Express},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=935662},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.483358},
  language = {en},
}
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                   EXHIBIT 21
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The following are the subsidiaries of Sterling Financial Corporation:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                        Subsidiary                             State of Incorporation or Organization
                        ----------                             --------------------------------------
<S>                                                            <C>
  Bank of Lancaster County, N.A.                                   (National Banking Association)
  1 East Main Street
  PO Box 0300
  Strasburg, PA  17579

       Town & Country Leasing, LLC                                          Pennsylvania
       1097 Commercial Avenue
       East Petersburg, PA  17520

       Sterling Financial Trust Company                                     Pennsylvania
       101 North Pointe Boulevard
       Lancaster, PA  17601-4133

       Equipment Finance LLC.                                               Pennsylvania
       118 West Airport Road
       Lititz, PA  17543

            EFI Holdings, Inc.                                                Delaware
            Wilmington, DE  19803

  Sterling Mortgage Services, Inc.                                          Pennsylvania
  101 North Point Boulevard
  Lancaster, PA  17601-4133

  T & C Leasing, Inc.                                                       Pennsylvania
  1097 Commercial Avenue
  East Petersburg, PA  17520

  The First National Bank of North East                            (National Banking Association)
  14 S. Main Street
  North East, Maryland 21901

  Bank of Hanover and Trust Company                                         Pennsylvania
  25 Carlisle Street
  Hanover, PA  17371

  HOVB Investment Company                                                     Delaware
  103 Foulk Road, Suite 202
  Wilmington, DE  19803

  Church Capital Management LLC                                             Pennsylvania
  301 Oxford Valley Road, Suite 801B
  Yardley, PA  19067

  Bainbridge Securities, Inc.                                               Pennsylvania
  301 Oxford Valley Road, Suite 801B
  Yardley, PA  19067
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>                                                                         <C>
  Sterling Financial Statutory Trust I (1)                                  Connecticut
  101 North Pointe Boulevard
  Lancaster, PA  17601

  Sterling Financial Statutory Trust II (1)                                 Connecticut
  101 North Pointe Boulevard
  Lancaster, PA  17601
</TABLE>

(1) Sterling owns 100% of Trust I and Trust II, however they are not included in
the consolidated financial statements as per FIN 46


                                       2
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Albert N. Eisenberg, Deceased. Law Offices of Seema Verma PLLC, Appellant; Citigroup, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Submitted June 18, 2012;

decided September 11, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Travis Augustine, Appellant.

Submitted September 24, 2012;

decided October 18, 2012

*1043Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Matthew C. Hug, Esq., 105 Jordan Road, Troy, New York 12180 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-15752

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00417-WSD-JSA-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

TONY MAURICE GRAVES, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________

(July 16, 2015)

Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 14-15752 Date Filed: 07/16/2015 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Mary Erickson, appointed counsel for Tony Maurice Graves in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Graves and 

has filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 

1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s 

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent 

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s 

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Graves’s conviction and sentence are 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 14-15752 Date Filed: 07/16/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 23.1















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-118845 and 333-129231) of Blue Ridge Real Estate Company (Blue Ridge) and Big Boulder Corporation (Big Boulder), of our reports, dated January 28, 2009, with respect to the combined financial statements of Blue Ridge and Big Boulder and the related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the October 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Blue Ridge and Big Boulder.









/s/ Parente Randolph, LLC











Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania

January 28, 2009
@conference{12056,
  author = {Charles Tarrio and Steven Grantham and Marc Cangemi and Robert Vest and Thomas Lucatorto and Noreen Harned},
  title = {EUVL dosimetry at NIST},
  year = {2009},
  month = {2009-03-13},
  publisher = {Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 7271, Alternative Lithographic Technologies, San Jose, CA},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=901663},
  language = {en},
}